Paul Singer and the Universality of “Anti-Semitism” by Andrew Joyce

Screen Shot 2015-08-04 at 11.09.17 AM

Paul Singer and the Universality of “Anti-Semitism”
August 1, 2015
Andrew Joyce

Screen Shot 2015-08-04 at 10.38.41 AM
Paul Singer, founder and president of Elliott Management Corp., speaks during the SkyBridge Alternatives (SALT) conference in Las Vegas, Nevada, U.S., on Wednesday, May 9, 2012. Singer said he’s betting the price of 30-year sovereign debt in the U.S., Europe and Japan will fall. Photographer: Jacob Kepler/Bloomberg via Getty Images

One of the most fundamental positions for White advocates concerned with Jewish influence must be the conviction that antagonism against Jews lies in Jewish behavior rather than solely the cultural pathology or psychological tendencies of non-Jews. A major testing ground for this position is the necessity for anti-Jewish attitudes to be present among geographically, racially, and culturally diverse peoples, and for the reasons behind this antagonism to be fairly uniform. In Separation and Its Discontents Kevin MacDonald argued that a social identity theory of anti-Semitism is highly compatible with supposing that anti-Semitism will be a very common characteristic of human societies in general. Reasons for this pervasiveness lie in Jewish cultural separatism leading to the perception of the Jewish group as an alien entity; inter-group resource and reproductive competition; and finally, the fact that Jews are, for cultural and genetic reasons, highly adept in resource competition against non-Jews. Additionally, Jews are adept at influencing culture and creating and influencing intellectual and political movements which often run contrary to the interests of the host population. Wherever these behaviors and circumstances are present, they contribute to the arousal of hostility in a host population.

Despite overwhelming evidence in support of our position, the vast majority of Jewish historiography and apologetics continue to argue something quite different. Our opponents have successfully disseminated the view that anti-Semitism is a peculiarly Western phenomenon, rooted more or less in a cocktail of evil Christian theology, the implicit frustrations of capitalist society, the despotic nature of the Western family, and even repressed sexual desires. A key aspect of maintaining this narrative has been to downplay non-Western (mainly Muslim) anti-Semitism, or attempt to give it different features. However, as MacDonald has noted, “the remarkable thing about anti-Semitism is that there is an overwhelming similarity in the complaints made about Jews in different places and over very long periods of historical time.”[1] Of the universal themes noted by MacDonald, the theme of resource competition and economic domination is perhaps foremost.

I was moved to reflect on the universality of this theme recently when surveying media coverage on Korean and Argentinian responses to the activities of Paul Singer and his co-ethnic shareholders at Elliot Associates, an arm of Singer’s Elliot Management hedge fund. The Korean story has its origins in the efforts of Samsung’s holding company, Cheil Industries, to buy SamSung C&T, the engineering and construction arm of the wider Samsung family of businesses. The move can be seen as part of an effort to reinforce control of the conglomerate by the founding Lee family and its heir apparent, Lee Jae-Jong. Trouble emerged when Singer’s company, which  holds a 7.12% stake in SamSung C&T and is itself attempting to expand its influence and control of Far East tech companies, objected to the move. The story is fairly typical of Jewish difficulties in penetrating business cultures in the Far East where impenetrable family monopolies, known in Korea as chaebols, are common. This new story reminded me very strongly of last year’s efforts by Jewish financier Daniel Loeb to obtain a board seat at Sony. Loeb was repeatedly rebuffed by COO Kuzuo Hirai, eventually selling his stake in Sony Corp. in frustration.

The predominantly Jewish-owned and operated Elliot Associates has a wealth of self-interest in preventing the Lee family from consolidating its control over the Samsung conglomerate. As racial outsiders, however, Singer’s firm were forced into several tactical measures in their 52-day attempt to thwart the merger. First came lawsuits.  When those failed, Singer and his associates then postured themselves as defending Korean interests, starting a Korean language website and arguing that their position was really just in aid of helping domestic Korean shareholders. This variation on the familiar theme of Jewish crypsis was quite unsuccessful. The Lee family went on the offensive immediately and, unlike many Westerners, were not shy in drawing attention to the Jewish nature of Singer’s interference and the sordid and intensely parasitic nature of his fund’s other ventures.

Screen Shot 2015-08-04 at 10.38.59 AM
“Because of Elliot Associates, Congo suffered even more hardship.”

The Lee offensive started with a series of cartoons posted on the Samsung website. Most singled out the manner in which Elliot Associates has enjoyed its remarkable growth by focusing on the purchase of national debts from struggling countries at a fraction of their worth, before using ruthless legal measures to sue those countries for values far exceeding the original debt. On its most basic level, the practice is really just the same as Jewish involvement in medieval tax farming. On the older practice, Salo Baron writes in Economic History of the Jews that Jewish speculators would pay a lump sum to the treasury before mercilessly turning on the peasantry to obtain “considerable surpluses … if need be, by ruthless methods.”[2] The activities of Elliot Associates are really the same speculation in debt, except here the trade in usury is practiced on a global scale with the feudal peasants of old now replaced with whole nations. The above cartoon refers to the specific activities of Elliot Associates in Congo where it originally bought $32.6 million in sovereign debt incurred by that country for the knockdown price of under $20 million. In 2002 and 2003, a British court (tactically chosen) forced the Congolese government to settle for an estimated $90 million, which included that all-important interest and fees. Elliot Associates rapidly became known as the quintessential “Vulture Fund.”

As I noted in my previous examination of contemporary Jewish usury, Jews have been at the forefront of innovation in debt for many centuries, and remain its most adroit auteurs. Although obviously rooted in centuries of Jewish financial practice, Singer and his co-ethnics (all four equity partners of Elliot are Jewish and its COO is the charmingly-named Zion Shohet), pioneered the finer points of the Vulture Fund concept. The firm was born in 1977 when Singer pooled $1.3 million from family and friends, but it only really took off in October 1995, when Elliott Associates L.P. purchased $28.7 million of Panamanian sovereign debt for the discounted price of $17.5 million. The banks holding those bonds, a group that included heavy hitters like Citi and Credit Suisse, had given up on repayment from Panama. To cut their losses they sold their holdings to Elliott which, like a medieval tax farmer, went in with a heavy hand. When Panama’s government asked for a restructuring of its foreign debt in 1995, the vast majority of its bondholders agreed — apart from Elliott. In July 1996, Elliott Associates, represented by one of the world’s most high-profile securities law firms, filed a lawsuit against Panama in a New York district court seeking full repayment of the original $28.7 million — plus interest and fees. The case made its way from a district court in Manhattan to the New York State Supreme Court, which sided with Elliott. In the end, Panama’s government had to pay the Jewish group over $57 million, with an additional $14 million going to other creditors. Overnight Singer’s group made $40 million, and the people of Panama found their original sovereign debt had more than doubled.

Foreign Policy described the court’s decision as “a groundbreaking moment in the modern history of finance.” By taking the case to a New York district court, Elliott broke with long-standing international law and custom, according to which sovereign governments are not sued in regular courts meant to deal with questions internal to a nation state. Further, the presiding judge accepted the case — another break with custom. It set the stage for two decades of similar parasitism on struggling countries by Elliot Associates, a practice that has reaped billions for Jewish financiers. Just one year after the Panama decision, Singer spent about $11 million on government-backed Peruvian bank debt in 1996. After taking Peru to court in the U.S., U.K., Luxembourg, Belgium, Germany, and Canada, the struggling nation finally agreed in 2000 to pay him $58 million. That meant he got better than a 400 percent return. In 2001 Elliot Associates purchased an Argentinian default for $48 million — the face value of that debt today is $630 million. The fund wants repayment for the full value of the debt to all of Argentina’s creditors, as it did in 1995 with Panama. This amounts to $1.5 billion, which could rise to $3 billion including, again, that all-important interests and fees.

The merciless nature of these Jewish vulture funds has provoked some comment, but the general populations of many countries aren’t familiar with enough of the facts to start joining the dots. Nevertheless, this type of financial parasitism has had a devastating impact on a number of nations. A sovereign’s money is technically owned by its citizens. Making the Panamanian, Argentinian, Congolese, Ecuadorian, Polish or Vietnamese government pay for the full value of the debt, plus interest and fees, even as the major creditors accepted a discounted payment, meant handing citizens’ money to a hedge fund rather than investing in, for example, roads, schools, hospitals, clean water projects or social welfare programs. In the aftermath of Elliot’s judgment against Congo, the Congolese were forced to abandon water purification programs leading to widespread dehydration. It was to this context that the Samsung cartoon referred.

Screen Shot 2015-08-04 at 10.39.20 AM
“Elliott Management’s representative method of earning money is to buy the national debt of a struggling country cheaply, then insist on taking control as an investor and start a legal suit.”

Other cartoons appearing at the same time represented Elliot, literally, as humanoid vultures with captions referring to the well-known history of the fund. In the above cartoon, the vulture offers assistance to a needy and destitute figure, but conceals an axe with which to later bludgeon the unsuspecting pauper.

After the cartoons appeared Singer and other influential Jews, including Abraham Foxman, cried anti-Semitism. This was despite the fact the cartoons contain no reference whatsoever to Judaism — unless of course one defines savage economic predation as a Jewish trait. Samsung denied the cartoons were anti-Semitic and took them off the website, but the uproar over the cartoons only seemed to spur on even more discussion about Jewish influence in South Korea than was previously the case. In a piece published a fortnight ago, Media Pen columnist Kim Ji-ho claimed “Jewish money has long been known to be ruthless and merciless.” Last week the former South Korean ambassador to Morocco, Park Jae-seon, expressed his concern about the influence of Jews in finance when he said, “The scary thing about Jews is they are grabbing the currency markets and financial investment companies. Their network is tight-knit beyond one’s imagination.” The next day, cable news channel YTN aired similar comments by local journalist Park Seong-ho, who stated on air that “it is a fact that Jews use financial networks and have influence wherever they are born.” It goes without saying that comments like these are unambiguously similar to complaints about Jewish economic practices in Europe over the course of centuries. The only common denominator between the context of fourteenth-century France and the context of twenty first-century South Korea is, you guessed it, Jewish economic practices.

In the end, the Lee strategy, based on drawing attention to the alien and exploitative nature of Elliot Associates, was overwhelmingly effective. Before a crucial shareholder vote on the Lee’s planned merger, Samsung Securities CEO Yoon Yong-am, said: “We should score a victory by a big margin in the first battle in order take the upper hand in a looming war against Elliott, and keep other speculative hedge funds from taking short-term gains in the domestic market.” When the vote finally took place a few days ago, a conclusive 69.5% of Samsung shareholders voted in favor of the Lee proposal, leaving Elliot licking its wounds and complaining about the ‘patriotic marketing’ of those behind the merger.

Jewish difficulties in penetrating close-knit Far Eastern monopolies, many of which are open in their belief that Jews are capable and ruthless opponents in business, thus persist. East Asians are seemingly aware that giving Jewish businessmen an inch will normally lead to non-Jews losing a mile. It is this honest grappling with the facts that kept Daniel Loeb off the board at Sony, and prevented Elliot Associates from making even slight gains at Samsung.

The Far East also appears less prone to Jewish moralizing about the “dangers” of anti-Semitism, and one finds that criticism of Jewish behaviors enjoys a considerably higher level of intellectual and cultural respectability. A good example is when Foumiko Kometani won the 1986 Akutagawa award, Japan’s top literary prize, for her novel Passover. Based on her real-life experiences with her Jewish husband and severely retarded bi-racial son, Kometani’s novel was subjected to excoriating criticism from Jewish critics who denounced her unflattering (but presumably quite accurate) depictions of Jewish figures in the book as “anti-Semitic.” Japanese critics, on the other hand, were notably unaffected by negative Jewish press treatment of the book, and found the treatment of Jewish clannishness and “distasteful” religious practices to be enriching qualities which gave the work a greater sense of authenticity and honesty.

Switching our focus to South America, high-profile figures in Argentina have also been accused of pushing “anti-Semitic conspiracy theories” for their responses to Elliot’s parasitism. After Singer’s firm won an extortionate judgment against Argentina at the US Supreme Court last year, Argentina President, Cristina Fernández de Kirchner, described Singer on her personal website as the “Vulture Lord.” But Jewish power-brokers were left even more aghast at Kirchner’s open denunciation of a “global modus operandi” that “generates international political operations of any type, shape and color.” They “contribute to financial attacks or simultaneous international media operations, or even worse, covert actions of various ‘services’ designed to destabilize governments.”

What Kirchner was referring to was the underlying issue at the heart of Singer’s particularly venomous pursuit of Argentine debt. You see, Argentina has cultivated relations with Iran for a number of decades now, and rumor has it that Kirchner and her foreign minister conspired with Iran to cover up its involvement in the 1994 bombing of a Jewish community center in Buenos Aires. Two years ago Jewish prosecutor Alberto Nisman lobbied the Delegation of Argentine Israeli Associations (Daia) — which represents the country’s Jews — to mount a legal challenge against a memorandum of understanding between Argentina and Iran. Nisman is reported to have told the Delegation that “if necessary, Paul Singer will help us.” Nisman then turned his attention to pursuing Kirchner for the alleged cover-up over the bombing. Argentina thus came under Jewish financial, political, diplomatic and legal attack. In January this year, however, Nisman was found dead with a single bullet wound to the head just hours before he was due to take his final report to Congress. Israelis and diaspora Jews have been crying foul ever since. In retaliation, Kirchner has pointed out that Singer is indeed one of the major funders of The Israel Project (TIP), the most vocal lobby in Washington against diplomacy with Iran. Kirchner argues that Singer’s effort to financially ravage Argentina is merely an extension of denunciations of Argentine-Iranian relations by AIPAC and Mark Dubowitz’s Foundation for Defense of Democracies. Also, by his own admission, Dubowitz was a personal friend of Nisman. Or in Kirchner’s words, “Everything has to do with everything.”

Of course, openly stating that Jews are powerful and work together for financial and political goals breaks one of the most cherished of contemporary taboos. Despite the astonishing level and deeply entwined nature of Jewish wealth and political power on display, I’m guessing the kosher script would have us all believe that what we are observing is just a bunch of coincidences and that Jews are in fact as poor and powerless as the next guy. “It’s a lie,” said Daia’s vice-president Waldo Wolff. “It’s terrible, it’s incredible.” A spokesman for Elliott Management denied the accusations, saying the suggestion “that Mr Singer had any contact whatsoever with Mr Nisman is categorically false. This is just another desperate attempt by Cristina Kirchner to blame creditors for her administration’s multiplying scandals and failed economic policies.” Of course, with reference to the facts outlined above, both Jewish groups are simply lying. Their lies didn’t assist the investigation of the 1994 bombing, with a new prosecutor dismissing all claims against Kirchner in April. Also, Nisman’s murder remains unsolved.

As Singer continues to tighten the screws on Argentina, the nation and its President continue to provoke accusations of “anti-Semitism.” During a July 2 visit to a Buenos Aries school, Kirchner told students that to better understand Argentina’s economic crisis, they should read Shakespeare’s The Merchant of Venice. On Twitter Kirchner recounted how she had asked students she met which Shakespeare play they were studying. When they told the president they were studying Romeo and Juliet, Kirchner said she responded, “I said, ‘Have you read The Merchant of Venice to understand the vulture funds?’ They all laughed. “No, don’t laugh,” I said, “Usury and the bloodsuckers were immortalized by the best literature for centuries.” The Delegation of Argentine Jewish Associations, quickly issued a statement condemning Kirchner’s comments and accused her of having “anti-Semitic” motivations behind her invocation of the play. Abraham Foxman then waddled onto the stage, urging Kirchner to “stop reinforcing anti-Semitic stereotypes.” “We are deeply concerned that President Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner is once again promoting anti-Semitic stereotypes,” whined Foxman. “The Merchant of Venice — with its nefarious character Shylock — reinforces stereotypes of Jews and presents them as money-hungry, conniving and cruel, and by suggesting students to study this play, she is sending a message to Argentina’s youth that Jews are somehow connected to the economic woes of her country.”

God forbid Argentine youth should ever come to such a view! How unfair that would be when the firm behind its pauperization is so thoroughly staffed by such Anglo-Saxons as Paul Singer, Zion Shohet, Jesse Cohn, Stephen Taub, Elliot Greenberg and Richard Zabel.

A final note about the Vulture Fund Jews. As hinted above in relation to their pro-Israel, anti-Iran activities, they are not just financially predatory. As Kirchner has stated, “Everything is connected to everything.” At TOO we are aware of the fact that strongly identifying as Jewish normally involves a great deal of hostility toward the traditions of the European peoples. This has very often led to attempts by powerful Jewish financiers and intellectuals to open our borders to mass immigration and overturn traditional values. I was recently sent a piece from CNBC which highlighted the fact that the U.S. Supreme Court decision in favor of same-sex marriage was welcomed by “a perhaps surprising group: conservative hedge fund managers.”

The news might have surprised CNBC, but won’t surprise TOO readers, or indeed anyone remotely familiar with the nature of the Jewish conflict with the West. There is nothing at all genuinely “conservative” about these people. The hedge fund managers included Dan Loeb, who failed to get the board seat at Sony, Paul Singer, Steve Cohen of Point72 Asset Management and Cliff Asness of AQR Capital Management. All have been vocal in disapproving of President Barack Obama, mainly for his diplomacy with Iran, but all have worked for years in support of gay marriage. “It’s a gratifying day for equality under the law,” Asness said after the Supreme Court ruling. “We’re pleased with the Court’s ruling because we believe in social justice for all Americans and hope this serves as a catalyst for global change,” added Cohen. Singer created American Unity PAC in 2012 to support the cause, and plowed $11 million into making gay marriage a reality. Other donors to American Unity PAC included Loeb, Asness, Seth Klarman of Baupost Group, and David Tepper of Appaloosa Management.  According to CNBC, Loeb, Cohen, Singer and other Jewish debt speculators helped to successfully push the legalization of same-sex marriage in New York in 2011. And backers of non-profit Freedom to Marry included Loeb, Klarman, Singer and Asness. So in case you’re wondering where a lot of that plundered international cash went, I can tell you that it ended up in places like the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs, and in myriad efforts to deconstruct the traditional fabric of your society (while still being called “conservative” by MSNBC).

“Anti-Semitism” isn’t a peculiarly Western phenomenon. Nor is it a Korean phenomenon, or an Argentine phenomenon. It is a Jewish phenomenon, and it has followed the Jewish people through the centuries and across the oceans. As long as Jews remain unchanged, so too will the response to them remain unchanged. Efforts to ameliorate “anti-Semitism” through vacuous appeals that it has its origins in sexual repression, Christianity, or family structure may succeed in a West which has grown fat, lazy, navel-gazing and maudlin, and is inundated by pro-Jewish propaganda in the media and educational system. But elsewhere on this Earth such Talmudic theorizing doesn’t go far. The inscrutable Asian will smile and nod at the Hebrew mogul, while patiently and knowingly keeping him from taking a seat or position in his financial affairs. Those in the Second or Third World, at the sharp end of Jewish usury, will remain unconvinced by the pious weeping of the perennial “victim” of world oppression who, paradoxically, possesses the whip hand over them. When the flagship of the Argentinian Navy was seized and detained in Ghana back in 2012 on the say-so of Paul Singer, there was no doubting the level of power that had now been attained by Jewish finance.

Screen Shot 2015-08-04 at 10.39.49 AM

Western youth today are engaged in squeezing itself into skinny jeans and protesting on behalf of African and Mexican invaders. While this pampered generation sips on artisanal coffee, and parades its empathy with alien criminals and a multitude of “trans” aberrations of nature, it remains ignorantly unaware that a cabal of vultures circles above them, just waiting for a fateful slip of their national economies. The U.S. government, it has been said, has made a point of siding with Argentina in its conflict with Elliot Management — the reason being that there are fears in Washington that it too may one day end up under the vulture’s talons.

The man on the street will deny the existence of such a threat, but we know it to be an empirically observable and documented fact. We can only hope for, and work towards, a time when our people will awaken, and allow us to secure a future for our children before it is too late.

____________

[1] K. MacDonald, Separation and Its Discontents: Toward and Evolutionary Theory of Anti-Semitism, (First Paperpack Edition,2004), 38.

[2] S. Baron (ed) Economic History of the Jews (New York, 1976), 46-7.

SOURCE

9/11: The Shocking Truth Laid Bare by Lasha Darkmoon

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/09/06/911-the-shocking-truth-laid-bare/

911Shock

9/11: The Shocking Truth Laid Bare

Lasha Darkmoon

September 7, 2014

This article consists of key 9/11 quotations arranged in the form of a 6500-word dramatic collage so as to give the impression of a live “debate” — an imaginary debate in which the shocking Truth is finally laid bare.

WHO DID 9/11?

israel911_banner

1.  Introduction

LASHA DARKMOON: I’d like to start by saying that every statement you read here is a 100 percent authentic quote. Nothing has been fabricated. You can check out every word and phrase on the internet. The only bits you won’t find already published are my own interconnecting comments. As the editor of the article, I have allowed myself the privilege of taking part in this imaginary “debate”.

If the overall effect is at times surrealistic, this is intentional. The entire 9/11 debate, after all, is an exercise in surrealism replete with the most bizarre Alice in Wonderland logic. The mere fact that the chief suspects of the 9/11 crime have been allowed to investigate themselves makes this only too clear.

The aim of the debate is to pose and answer the question: Who did 9/11? My own conclusion has already been stated elsewhere:

“Israel is the rogue state that is arguably responsible for the greatest mass murder in history: the catastrophe of 9-11. If scientific evidence and forensic logic are anything to go on, Israel has to be suspect number one here, given its unbroken record of terrorism and its endless breaches of international law. Any country that can orchestrate such a spectacular crime and get away with it—while somehow managing to pin the blame on nineteen Arabs with box cutters—is clearly a force to be reckoned with.”

Finally, I wish to apologize in advance for any offense given by this article. No offense is intended. My aim is simply to provide the reader with a wide variety of 9/11 quotes in a dramatic format that will, hopefully, have maximum emotional impact.

2876903_370-320x240

Wildcard. Ruthless and cunning. Has capability to target US forces and make it look like a Palestinian/Arab act.”

— Comment about Mossad in a report issued by the US Army School of Advanced Military Studies, quoted in the Washington Post on September 10, 2001, the day before 9/11.

DR ALAN SABROSKY (former director of studies at the US Army War College) : What we need to stand up and say is that not only did they, the Israelis, attack the USS Liberty – they did 9/11 also. They did it!

I have had long conversations over the past two weeks with contacts at the Army War College, at the Headquarters Marine Corps, and I have made it absolutely clear in both cases that it is 100 percent certain that 9/11 was a Mossad operation. Period. The Zionists are playing this as an all-or-nothing exercise. Because if they lose this one, if the American people ever realize what really happened, they’re done!

LASHA DARKMOON: Mr President, I can see you are not very happy with this introduction. Would you like to make the opening statement for the defense?

BARACK OBAMA (lamely) : I’m aware that there’s still some who would question or even justify the events of 9/11. But let us be clear: Al Qaeda killed nearly 3,000 people on that day. The victims were innocent men, women and children from America and many other nations who had done nothing to harm anybody. And yet al-Qaeda chose to ruthlessly murder these people, claimed credit for the attack, and even now states their determination to kill on a massive scale. They have affiliates in many countries and are trying to expand their reach. These are not opinions to be debated; these are facts.

TONY BLAIR: There have been the most terrible, shocking events taking place in the United States of America within the last hour or so, including two hi-jacked planes being flown deliberately into the World Trade Centre. I am afraid we can only imagine the terror and the carnage there and the many, many innocent people who will have lost their lives…. For the moment, let me say this: Saddam Hussein’s regime is despicable, he is developing weapons of mass destruction, and we cannot leave him doing so unchecked….

HUGO CHAVEZ: Don’t be shameless, Mr Blair! Don’t be immoral, Mr. Blair! You are one of those who have no morals. You are an imperialist pawn who attempts to curry favor with Bush-Hitler, the number one mass murderer and assassin there is on the planet! Go straight to hell, Mr. Blair!

FRANCESCO COSSIGA (former Prime Minister of Italy): All the intelligence services of America and Europe know well that the disastrous 9/11 attack was planned and realized by the CIA and Mossad, with the help of the Zionist world, in order to pin the blame on the Arab Countries and persuade the Western powers to intervene in Iraq and Afghanistan.

ABRAHAM FOXMAN (furious) :  These hateful conspiracy theories rationalize and fuel global anti-Semitism! . . . Perhaps the most notorious conspiracy theory of modern times suggested that 4,000 Jews were pre-emptively warned to stay away from the World Trade Center the day of the 9/11 terrorist attacks, a myth that quickly morphed into the Big Lie that Israel and Jews were responsible for 9/11.

BRITISH HISTORIAN DAVID IRVING (sarcastically) : We are happy to report that the 4,000 figure dwindled eventually to three (not three thousand, but three), then two, then one: the unfortunate Daniel Lewin!

LASHA DARKMOON (explaining) : On September 12, the Jerusalem Post reported that the Israeli embassy in America was bombarded on 9/11 with calls from 4,000 worried Israeli families. This was a preemptive move. It was a sly attempt to deceive the public into thinking the Israelis were victims of 9/11 like everyone else. In fact, they were not.

Nearly 500 foreign nationals from over 80 different nations had been killed in the World Trade Center. A large number of Israelis had worked in the buildings and so a proportionately large number of Israelis could be expected to have died there. To give the impression that this was the case, President Bush, primed by his Jewish minders,  announced soon after the tragedy that 130 Israelis had died in the towers. To his subsequent  embarrassment, 129 of these Israelis were found to be alive and well. The number of Israelis who died in the Twin Towers turned out to be ridiculously small, in defiance of the law of averages — only one man! And he was a chance visitor who happened to be passing by.

It appears that hundreds of Israelis who ordinarily worked in the buildings, or had business there every day, had either been forewarned to stay away, or, by sheer good luck, had been kept away by mysterious forces.  In total, three Israelis died in the 9-11 attack: two on the ‘hijacked’ planes and one in the Twin Towers, a casual visitor. The rest had been warned to stay away by the Odigo messaging service.

Coincidentally, Odigo had a branch office only two blocks away from the World Trade Center. Even more coincidentally, Odigo’s headquarters were located in Herzliya, Israel, a town just north of Tel Aviv where — wonder of wonders! — Mossad is also headquartered.

ALEX DIAMANDIS (Odigo’s vice president, admitting Israeli foreknowledge) : The messages said something big was going to happen in a certain amount of time, and it did — almost to the minute!

LASHA DARKMOON:  Well, there you have it! A frank admission that Odigo, an Israeli company located a mere stone’s throw away from Mossad in a little town near Tel Aviv , knew that 9/11 was going to happen and warned Jews to stay away! There were many lucky Jews that morning. Consider this. An Israeli government run company called Zim Israel Navigational, the 9th largest shipping company in the world, had 200 employees working in the North tower. One week before 9/11, Zim moved out of its World Trade Center offices with its 200 workers. And they were so keen to get out quickly that they were ready to pay a $50,000 fine for breaking their lease!

Then there was ‘Lucky’ Larry Silverstein, owner of the WTC buildings. He too had a miraculous escape. Every morning, as faithful as clockwork, Lucky Larry would enjoy breakfast at the Windows on the World restaurant atop the North Tower. His daughter Lisa would show up for breakfast too — a regular feature. On the morning of 9/11, both father and daughter (smilingly pictured here)  found excuses for staying away. Lucky Larry discovered he had a dermatologist’s appointment. Daughter Lisa was caught up in a convenient traffic jam.

Lucky Larry had a son. He too was expected in the building that morning. Like his sister Lisa, he too had the extraordinary good luck to be caught in a traffic jam — in a different part of the city.

Truly, God was smiling on his Chosen people that morning.

484698_377598439012688_1253034845_n

 

2.  They lie about everything

LASHA DARKMOON: How can so many Americans still believe in the outrageous lie that Al Qaeda did 9/11 when there are so many Jewish fingerprints all over this crime?

SEYMOUR HERSH:  We lie about everything.

FRANCESCO COSSIGA (former Prime Minister of Italy) : I have always said that the intelligence agencies of the leading nations of the world are certainly very well aware that the official version is a fraud. The largest media networks are also aware of the 9-11 hoax, primarily because of their fundamental role in perpetrating this fraud on the public. The people are always the last to know the truth.

ABRAHAM FOXMAN (angrily):  It is incumbent upon all good people who reject hateful conspiracy theories and anti-Semitism to stand up and speak out! — so that these unacceptable views remain marginalized and relegated to the far fringes of society and the darkest corners of cyberspace!

KEVIN BARRETT (ignoring Foxman) : Recently, Seymour Hersh, America’s top mainstream investigative reporter, broke the news that the US government’s claim to have killed Osama Bin Laden on May 2nd, 2011 was a big lie. “There’s not one word of truth in it,” he said. Hersh went on to harshly criticize his long-time employer, the New York Times, and other big media outlets. He said all big US media outlets should be shut down for lying to the American people.

SEYMOUR HERSH :  Lying has become the staple.

KEVIN BARRETT:  Other mainstream journalists agree that the US government’s story of Osama Bin Laden and 9/11 is a big lie. Sherwood Ross, an award-winning journalist who has worked for the City News Bureau of Chicago, the Chicago Daily News, and for Reuters and other wire services, told me this in a recent radio interview.

SHERWOOD ROSS:  It’s very doubtful that Muslims were behind 9/11. I don’t think 9/11 was an Arab conspiracy. I think it’s an American conspiracy to overthrow the government of the United States and install what is becoming a police state.

KEVIN BARRETT:  Ross has explained that American journalists are no longer free to expose even the most outrageous falsehoods.

SHERWOOD ROSS:  You don’t see any serious questioning by the mainstream media. I thought one of the tip-offs that it was a put-up job was when a cameraman from a little weekly in Pennsylvania went to the site where this airliner had supposedly crashed on 9/11. And he said, “I didn’t see any airliner. I saw a hole in the ground. I didn’t see any bodies. I didn’t see any luggage.” There was no wreckage! Reporters who worked in the Press Room at the Pentagon went out there on the lawn, and they couldn’t see any airliner!

THIERRY MEYSSAN: (famous French author) : How does a plane 125 ft. wide and 155 ft. long fit into a hole which is only 60 ft. across?

KEVIN BARRETT:  I asked Ross whether he is allowed to express such views in his [mainstream] articles.

SHERWOOD ROSS:  Absolutely not! You won’t see me quoted nowadays by the Associated Press!

KEVIN BARRETT:  Another leading American journalist, Paul Craig Roberts, has also been banned from US mainstream media for telling the truth about 9/11.

PAUL CRAIG ROBERTS (grimly) : Now seen universally as a lawless warmonger and a nuisance, Washington’s soft power has been squandered. With its influence on the wane, Washington has become more of a bully. In response, the rest of the world is isolating Washington.

KEVIN BARRETT:  Dr. Roberts served as Assistant Secretary of the Treasury, won the French Legion of Honor and other awards for his contributions to economics, and has been a regular columnist for the Wall Street Journal, Business Week, and other mainstream publications. But since he spoke out about the controlled demolitions of the three World Trade Center skyscrapers on 9/11, Paul Craig Roberts has been put on the mainstream media’s no-publish list.

PAUL CRAIG ROBERTS:  One of the worst things that ever happened to America was when President Clinton allowed five companies to concentrate [= buy up] the American media. The so-called mainstream media is no longer the media. It doesn’t tell you anything. It’s a propaganda ministry—the Ministry of Propaganda.

KEVIN BARRETT:  Rather than writing for the mainstream media, Paul Craig Roberts is now exposing the fake killing of Osama Bin Laden.

PAUL CRAIG ROBERTS:  The neoconservatives who advocate America’s hegemony over the world called for “a new Pearl Harbor” that would allow them to launch wars of conquest. No evidence exists that supports the government’s 9/11 story. It is unnecessary for me to report the voluminous evidence that conclusively proves that the official story is a lie! You can read it for yourself. It is available online. You can read what the architects and engineers for 9/11 truth have to say. You can read the scientists’ reports.

LASHA DARKMOON:  More than 200 senior military, intelligence, and law enforcement officials, including two generals, have now questioned the 9-11 Commission’s report. They have been joined by over 1500 top architects and engineers, 250 pilots and aviation experts, 400 university professors, and 250 survivors and their families.

KEVIN BARRETT:  Don’t bother reading the mainstream media! As Seymour Hersh, Sherwood Ross, Paul Craig Roberts, and a rapidly growing number of ordinary Americans realize, the mainstream media’s motto is now: “We lie about everything.”

OSAMA BIN LADEN:  As a Muslim, I do my best to avoid telling a lie. I had no knowledge of these attacks.

PROF. DAVID RAY GRIFFIN (author of eleven books on 9-11) : All the proffered evidence that America was attacked by Muslims on 9-11 appears to have been fabricated.

LASHA DARKMOON: It’s hard to see how Muslim hijackers could have been involved, given that no CCTV pictures exist of the hijackers anywhere in the airports. Moreover, there are no Arab names on any flight lists. No boarding staff were prepared to testify to having seen any Arab-looking persons boarding the planes. Above all, there’s not a single post-mortem indicating any Arab dead bodies at the scene of the crime. On the other hand, the passport of one of the alleged terrorists, Satam Al Suqami, apparently came fluttering down to Ground Zero where the FBI found it intact. Amazing, isn’t it?

DAVID RAY GRIFFIN:   The FBI claimed that, while searching the streets after the destruction of the World Trade Center, they discovered the passport of Satam al-Suqami, one of the hijackers on American Flight 11. For this to be true, the passport would have had to survive the collapse of the North Tower, which evidently pulverized almost everything in the building into fine particles of dust — except the steel and al-Suqami’s passport. This claim is too absurd to pass the giggle test.

MohamedAttaVisa-320x200

The passport of alleged Al-Qaeda mastermind Mohammed Atta was miraculously found intact among the ashes of the Twin Towers.

PAUL CRAIG ROBERTS: How could a tiny undamaged passport be found in the rubble of two skyscrapers, each more than 100 stories tall, when bodies, office furniture and computers could not be found?

LASHA DARKMOON: Nothing that could have embarrassed the US government survived the explosions. Even the “indestructible” black boxes containing key flight information had been complete vaporized, contrary to the laws of physics. Even more miraculously and conveniently for the US government, two charred passports of alleged Al Qaeda terrorists, one of them ringleader Mohammed Atta (pictured), had been found intact in the ruins — almost as if someone had placed them there on purpose to be found.  (See here)

CHRISTOPHER BOLLYN:  What many people don’t understand about 9-11 is that there was no proper criminal investigation into 9/11. Although the World Trade Center was the scene of the greatest mass murder in U.S. history, the evidence from the crime scene, such as the structural steel, was treated like scrap; cut up into small pieces, mixed with other scrap metal, and shipped to China to be melted down. The public was given an utterly false story and incited to wage war in Afghanistan while the crucial evidence was being destroyed in two junkyards in New Jersey.

Screen Shot 2014-09-09 at 8.28.46 AM

“I had no knowledge of these attacks!”

OSAMA BIN LADEN (pictured) :  I had no knowledge of these attacks!

CHRISTOPHER BOLLYN:  The FBI investigation of the events of 9-11 was being managed by Michael Chertoff, the Assistant Attorney General  who was the US official who was supposed to collect the evidence, find the guilty parties, and prosecute them. Under Chertoff, however, an Israeli-American dual national, there was no 9-11 investigation and no prosecution.

In the end there was not a single trial for any of the families who lost loved ones on 9-11. The US District Judge who oversaw the 9-11 litigation was Alvin K. Hellerstein, a dedicated Zionist in New York whose son lives in an illegal Israeli settlement on the occupied West Bank.

If a crime like 9-11 is not properly investigated and prosecuted, you can be sure there is something to hide.

BIOLOGIST RICHARD DAWKINS (fatuously) : Bin Laden has won! (After a jar of honey belonging to him was confiscated by airport security).

OSAMA BIN LADEN:  What is this? Is it not that there exists a government within the government in the United Sates? That secret government must be asked as to who carried out the attacks. I have already said that we are not hostile to the United States. We are against the US Government system, which makes other nations slaves of the United States.

This system is totally in control of the American Jews, whose first priority is Israel, not the United States. It is clear that the American people are themselves the slaves of the Jews and are forced to live according to the principles and laws laid down by the Jews.

3.  They kill people to silence them

KEVIN BARRETT:  One of the leading scientists challenging the US government’s version of 9/11, Dr. Crockett Grabbe, has gone on record charging 9/11 cover-up forces with a series of murders and attempted murders — including attempts on his own life.

LASHA DARKMOON:  They’re now actually killing people to silence them?

KEVIN BARRETT:  In a recent interview on my radio show, Dr. Grabbe, a physics professor with a Ph.D. from Cal Tech, described a series of attempts on his life that followed the publication of his 2011 book National Swindle of the World Trade Center.

DR CROCKETT GRABBE:  I’m not just referring to the murders that occurred on 9/11, but also the unexplained murders of both 9/11 witnesses and truth-seekers: Michael Doran, David Graham, Bertha Champagne. The interesting thing is, Bertha Champagne and Nancy Hamilton both had unexplained deaths from automobiles running over them.

LASHA DARKMOON:  I notice quite a few mysterious automobile accidents taking place nowadays. This seems to be the new way of disposing of government whistleblowers and high profile witnesses. I’m thinking here of the Franklin cover-up and the Gunderson case, both involving high-level witnesses to government involvement in pedophile crimes. These witnesses conveniently meet their deaths in car accidents—bumped off  before they can get to court.

DR GRABBE:  The thing that made me a believer is that when I published my first book in 2011, there were unexplained, strange attempts to hit me with an automobile. It was just unbelievable! I’m not a 9/11 witness or anything. I’m just a physicist showing that nothing supports the official version of 9/11.

LASHA DARKMOON:  How did they try to kill you?

DR GRABBE:  There were actually several cases. I’ll mention two from back in 2011. The first one was…one morning I went out for a walk on the street. And there was a pickup that went past me at very high speed…then quickly stopped and started backing up at high speed towards me. I felt he was trying to hit me with the vehicle, but I couldn’t be sure till later, when I was going out to get my mail in the evening.

LASHA DARKMOON: This guy tried to kill you twice on the same day?

DR CROCKETT GRABBE:  When I opened my mailbox, I heard an engine start up and saw a car come around the curve very rapidly about a hundred to two hundred feet away from me. My mailbox was full of mail … if I’d gotten the mail out, that pick-up, the way it was traveling close to sixty miles per hour and coming straight at me, it would have hit me!

KEVIN BARRETT:  Dr. Grabbe’s book, Anatomy of Mass Murders, discusses the suspicious deaths of nineteen 9/11 witnesses or truth-seekers: Barry Jennings, Beverly Eckart, Kenneth Johanneman, Christopher Landis, Paul Smith, Major General David Wherley, Salvatore Princiotta, Deborah Palfrey, Barbara Olson, Michael H Doran, David Graham, Bertha Champagne, Nancy Hamilton, Suzanne Jovin, Perry and Beth Ann Kucinich (Rep. Dennis Kucinich siblings), David Kelly, Presanna Kalahasthi, and Senator Paul Wellstone.

Screen Shot 2014-09-09 at 8.31.06 AM

SENATOR WELLSTONE AND HIS FAMILY

The senator asked too many awkward questions about 9/11. Soon he was dead, along with his wife and daughter, in a mysterious plane crash…

LASHA DARKMOON:  Senator Paul Wellstone (pictured), now that’s an interesting case. The Senator was a 9/11 Truther who had said, “There are so many things going on in relation to 9/11 that just don’t make sense.”

Inflammatory comments like that, coming from a US senator, are clearly incompatible with longevity. Soon after he said that the Senator was dead, in a plane crash: along with his wife, his daughter, three staff members and two professionally trained pilots.

The investigation of this mysterious multiple death was a farce, just as the investigation of what really happened on 9/11 was perhaps the ultimate farce — an “investigation” conducted by Israeli American citizen Michael Chertoff (pictured here with his Jewish accomplices) into a crime committed by Mossad in cahoots with American neoconservatives — most of them also Jewish.

The only plausible explanation for Senator Wellstone’s death is that he and his entourage were assassinated.

DR JIM FETZER:  Seymour Hirsch disclosed recently that Vice President Cheney was running an executive assassination ring from his office in the White House, where Wellstone appears to have been one of his targets.

LASHA DARKMOON: Why has no one investigated Cheney?

KEVIN BARRETT:  Despite all the murders, the truth continues to spread. As a huge billboard in Times Square trumpeted the “smoking gun of 9/11” — the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7 – Americans rose up this fall to stop the planned bombing of Syria. Why? They simply did not believe government and media claims about the al-Ghouta chemical attack. Americans have been dragged into wars by false-flag attacks and government lies too many times.

GEORGE W. BUSH (butting in angrily) : Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists!

PAUL CRAIG ROBERTS:  America is in the toilet, and the rest of the world knows it. But the neocons who rule in Washington and their Israeli ally are determined that Washington start yet more wars to create lebensraum for Israel.

SENATOR  JOHN  McCAIN (taking the high moral ground) : Blaming the US government for the events of 9/11 mars the memories of all those lost on that day! It shakes Americans’ faith in their government at a time when that faith is already near an all-time low! It traffics in ugly, unfounded accusations of extraordinary evil against fellow Americans!

IRANIAN EX-PRESIDENT MAHMOUD AHMADINEJAD : The majority of the American people believe some segments within the US  government orchestrated the 9/11 attack to reverse the declining US economy and its grips on the Middle East in order also to save the Zionist regime.

BARACK OBAMA: For him to make a statement like that is inexcusable!

ANN COULTER: We should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them all to Christianity!

AL GOLDSTEIN (Jewish pornographer) : Christ sucks!

SARAH SILVERMAN (Jewish comedienne, passing off hate speech as humor) : I hope the Jews did kill Christ! I’d fucking do it again — in a second!

KEVIN MACDONALD:  The Jewish elite fears an America that takes Christianity seriously.

SARAH SILVERMAN (insulting the relatives of 9/11 victims) : 9/11 widows give the best hand jobs!

LASHA DARKMOON: Despicable rat!

T.S. ELIOT (intervening tactlessly) : The rats are underneath the piles! The Jew is underneath the lot!

LASHA DARKMOON:  Watch out, Mr Eliot, or you’ll ruin your reputation!… Suffice to say it’s quite true that there were lots of Jews lurking around “underneath the piles”, so to speak, both on 9/11 and before. There were many Jews in the Bush administration. They had close ties to the Israeli government.

Every one of the following kingpins of the Bush administration was also an Israeli citizen: Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Perle, Douglas Feith, Michael Chertoff, George Tenet (real name Cohen), Elliot Abrams, Donald Kagan, Richard Haas, Kenneth Adelman, Edward Luttwak, Robert Satloff, David Frum, David Wurmser, Steve Goldsmith, Marc Grossman, Ari Fleisher.

EHUD BARAK:  Let there be no illusions! This attack is an attack on everything that Western civilization holds dear!  And we know who the attackers are!

CHRISTOPHER BOLLYN:  Ehud Barak certainly knows “who the attackers are”.  He sees the chief architect of 9-11 every time he looks in the mirror!

DONALD RUMSFELD:  There are things we don’t know we don’t know.

GEORGE W. BUSH (pounding the table with his fist) : If you’re not with us, you’re against us!

BENJAMIN NETANYAHU (smirks) : We are benefiting from one thing, and that is the attack on the Twin Towers and Pentagon!

Screen Shot 2014-09-09 at 8.31.23 AM

“9/11 was good for Israel!”

4.  The 9/11 war criminals should be rounded up and executed

LASHA DARKMOON:  The chief suspects of the 9/11 crime of the century have often been named. Here are the names of 39 individuals who should be taken into custody at once and closely questioned in a humane and civilized manner, preferably without waterboarding. Those with asterisks after their names are Jewish:

George W. Bush, Tony Blair, Benjamin Netanyahu*, Ehud Barak*, Shimon Peres*, Henry Kissinger*, George HW Bush, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Richard Perle*, Douglas Feith*, Dov Zakheim*, George Tenet (Cohen)*, Robert Mueller, John Ashcroft, Michael Chertoff*, Michael Mukasey*, Colin Powell, Condoleeza Rice, Richard Armitage, Philip Zelikow*, Ari Fleischer*, Karl Rove, Elliott Abrams*, Lewis “Scooter” Libby*, Jack Abramoff*, Rudolph Giuliani, Eliot Spitzer*, Richard Holbrooke, Michael Ledeen*, Larry Silverstein*, Frank Lowy*, David Rockefeller, Rupert Murdoch*, Maurice Greenberg*, Paul Bremer, William Kristol*,James Woolsey, Newt Gingrich.

Of these top 39 suspects, note that 22 (or more than half) are Jews, most of whom are also dual citizens with Israeli passports. If guilty of treason and mass murder, they should all be executed without mercy  — like the pathological liar Tony Blair, for example, whose sycophantic services to his Jewish masters have helped to make him a multimillionaire.

TONY BLAIR: Before people crow about the absence of Weapons of Mass Destruction, I suggest they wait a bit…. As I have said throughout, I have no doubt that they will find the clearest possible evidence of Saddam’s weapons of mass destruction.

WILLIAM DALRYMPLE (British historian) : Like anyone else who knows anything about the Middle East, you just pray that this man will shut the fuck up.

Screen Shot 2014-09-09 at 8.29.17 AM

“Lead me into war!”

ZBIGNIEW BRZEZINSKI: Blair is a lightweight. I don’t like his political morals and how he’s been enriching himself since leaving office. He preaches high moral language but … I have a visceral contempt for Blair. Not dislike. Just contempt.

GEORGE W. BUSH: Yeah, Blair, what are you doin’?

TONY BLAIR (groveling at the feet of his Master) : Lead me into war…you know I believe in you!

GEORGE W. BUSH (maniacally) :  We will rid the world of evildoers!

?

LASHA DARKMOON: Over a hundred co-conspirators have so far been accused of having been deeply implicated in 9-11, but undoubtedly there are many others whose complicity and silence have had to be bought by the only two means available: the carrot and the stick. The stick involves either the threat of blackmail or instant death if they dare to step out of line — as in the case of Senator Wellstone and Dr David Kelly. The carrot involves bribery and sweeteners: astronomical sums of money paid into secret bank accounts for the rest of their lives, guaranteeing total silence in anticipation of those enormous annual deposits.

Where will the money come from to pay out such stupendous sums?

Quite simple. The money was already stolen before 9/11 with the help of Israeli dual citizen, Rabbi Dov Zakheim. He somehow managed to “lose” at least  $2.3 trillion, or $3 trillion according to most other accounts. Antiwar activist and CIA whistleblower Susan Lindauer has given evidence that the money actually stolen from the American taxpayer amounts to a staggering  $9.1 trillion.

To get through even $1 trillion wouldn’t be easy. A trillion dollars would be enough to keep 1000 conspirators and their families in pig heaven for the rest of their lives. The other trillions have reportedly made their way into secret bank accounts, with the bulk ending up in Tel Aviv and Zurich.

See here for more on the missing trillions

 KEVIN BARRETT:  So what happened to the Pentagon’s missing 2.3 trillion dollars—or $9.1 trillion if you believe Susan Lindauer? The one thing we know for sure is that it has never been found. At least not officially. Lindauer says insiders know it was embezzled by agents of Israel. Interestingly, the Comptroller of the Pentagon—the man who was running the Pentagon’s finances—was a known Israeli agent, Rabbi Dov Zakheim.

Screen Shot 2014-09-09 at 8.30.10 AM

RABBI DOV ZAKHEIM

How did a Jewish rabbi gain control over Pentagon finances and manage to lose $3 trillion in three months?

LASHA  DARKMOON:  Rabbi Dov Zakheim (pictured), born 1948, dual American-Israeli citizen, was appointed Comptroller of the Pentagon in May 2001. This put him in full charge of Pentagon finances. By September 2001, a mere three months later, he had managed to “lose” or misplace three trillion dollars — at the phenomenal rate of a trillion dollars a month.

That’s $1000 billion (or $1 million million) in 30 days! No one in recorded history has ever managed to “lose” such a colossal sum of money in so short a time.

In spite of this, the woefully incompetent — or shamelessly rapacious —  rabbi was allowed to continue in his post of Pentagon Comptroller until March 2004, almost another three years. With complete impunity.

Let  me give you a few fascinating statistics now that will allow you to view this vast hemmorhage of wealth in its proper perspective. The richest top ten Jewish American billionnaires in 2012, according to Forbes magazine, owned assets between them amounting to $203 billion. (See here). This is roughly one-fifteenth of the $3 trillion Rabbi Zakheim clawed away from the American taxpayer in three months.

The combined wealth of all the billionaires in the entire world in 2012 amounted to $4.6 trillion. (See here).  If Rabbi Zakheim actually stole $9.1 trillion, as alleged by CIA whistleblower Susan Lindauer, he would have gotten away with almost twice the total wealth of all the billionnaires in the world.

The missing trillions have reportedly found their way to Israel, resulting since 2001 in vast real estate acquisitions by Israeli interests in South America, Europe, the United States and other parts of the world. Much of the world’s surface today is probably owned by absentee Jewish landlords, with vast holdings under the stewardship of the Rothschild family.

KEVIN BARRETT:  The 9/11 attack on the Pentagon targeted the accountants who were on the trail of the missing trillions.

LASHA DARKMOON: How convenient. The crime can no longer be investigated because the investigators have been killed. And the relevant documents were destroyed. Accidentally.

PRESIDENT JIMMY CARTER (sadly): The post-9/11 USA is no longer a beacon of human rights.

GEORGE W. BUSH:  Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists! We will find those who did this! We will smoke them out of their holes! We’ll get them running! We’ll bring them to justice! We will not tire, we will not falter, we will not fail! We will rid the world of evildoers!

SENATOR ORRIN HATCH: We’re going to find out who did this and we’re going after the bastards!

JERRY FALWELL (late televangelist) :  I really believe that the pagans and the abortionists and the feminists and the gays and the lesbians—I point the finger in their face and say — ‘You helped this happen!’

BAPTIST PASTOR FRED PHELPS: Thank God for 9/11! Thank God that five years ago the wrath of God was poured out on this evil nation—America, land of the Sodomite damned! The deadly events of 9/11 were direct outpourings of divine retribution, the immediate visitation of God’s wrath and vengeance and punishment for America’s horrendous sodomite sins!

LASHA DARKMOON (aside) : Watch out, Obama!

PAUL CRAIG ROBERTS:  If Muslims were capable of pulling off 9/11, they are certainly capable of assassinating Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Perle, Libby, Condi Rice, Kristol, Bolton, Goldberg, and scores of others during the same hour of the day. The argument is not believable that a government that was incapable of preventing 9/11 is so all-knowing that it can prevent assassination of unprotected neocons. Try to imagine the propaganda value of terrorists wiping out the neoconservatives in one fell swoop, followed by an announcement that every member of the federal government down to the lowest GS, every member of the House and Senate, and every governor was next in line to be bumped off.

LASHA DARKMOON: Excellent point. If Al Qaeda were so fiendishly clever and formidable that that it could carry out 9/11 so easily, how come it hasn’t assassinated George Bush, Tony Blair, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Perle, and all its other implacable enemies? President Bush, would you like to sum up for the 9/11 orthodoxy?

PRESIDENT GEORGE W BUSH: You can fool some of the people all the time, and those are the ones you want to concentrate on.

LASHA DARKMOON:  Perfect!  A final question. When you were president, were you ever in control? Or were you just a puppet of the Jews?

ARIEL SHARON (from the Other Side) :  I want to tell you something very clear.  We, the Jewish people, control America, and the Americans know it!

BENJAMIN NETANYAHU (sneering contemptuously) : America is a thing you can move very easily, move it in the right direction….  Once we squeeze all we can out of the United States, it can dry up and blow away.

ADMIRAL THOMAS MOORER (Chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff under Ronald Reagan) : I’ve never seen a President stand up to them. It just boggles the mind. They always get what they want. The Israelis know what is going on all the time. If the American people understood what a grip those people have got on our government, they would rise up in arms. Our citizens certainly don’t have any idea what goes on.

LASHA DARKMOON: Monsieur Voltaire, you have remained remarkably silent all this time … almost as if you were the ghost at the banquet. As one of the world’s most distinguished Enlightenment philosophers, perhaps you would like to give us your views on the Jewish Question. Whither Jewry?

VOLTAIRE (choking with rage) : Our masters and our enemies!… whom we detest!… the most abominable people in the world!… They are, all of them, born with a raging fanaticism in their hearts, just as the Bretons and the Germans are born with blond hair. I would not be in the least bit surprised if these people would not some day become deadly to the human race.

5.  Conclusion

LASHA  DARKMOON: Forbes magazine, which supplies us regularly with lists of the richest people in the world, makes a point of excluding the very richest: those whose wealth is either beyond computation or public scrutiny. These include the Queen of the Netherlands (the world’s richest woman), the Queen of England, the Queen of Denmark, the Queen of Spain, the Sultan of Brunei, King Fahd of Saudi Arabia, and the kings of Kuwait, Oman, Qatar and Bahrain.

Though the wealth of these few individuals, all of them non-Jewish, is enough to feed the starving planet, it is a mere fraction of the wealth of the Jews.

Most of the world’s wealth is concentrated in the hands of the House of Rothschild, with lesser but still vast (undisclosed) amounts in the secret vaults of a few elite Jewish families: the Schiffs, the Wallenbergs, the Oppenheims, the Morgenthaus, the Goldman-Sachs, the Lehmans and the Guggenheims. The entire wealth of the world has been estimated as $990 trillion. Of this, the lion’s share, roughly $500 trillion, is reported to belong to one dynastic family alone: the Rothschilds.

The Rothschilds and the Rockefellers (the latter family rumored to be worth $100 trillion) own between them all the world’s major banks, big corporations, conglomerates and oil companies, apart from huge real estate holdings such as castles, palaces, stately mansions, luxury hotels,  race courses, casinos, exotic holiday resorts, and vast tracts of farm land and virgin forest.

Staggering amounts of gold bullion, diamonds, jewelry, rare art, antiquarian books, coins, precious metals and stones clog up their underground vaults. These people have never sight eyes on most of the things they possess. They have never set foot on the land they own. In spite of all their fantastic wealth, they feel desperately poor and insecure; nor can they rest easy in their beds until they own everything — and the rest of mankind is reduced to a condition of abject slavery.

9/11 was a catalyzing event for these emperors of opulence. It ushered in a new world order and precipitated a series of catastrophic new wars that would help to create new starving refugees, new impoverished immigrants, and new opportunities for endless exploitation by an essentially hostile Jewish elite.

KEVIN MACDONALD:  A new Jewish elite has seized all of the major choke points of American society: academia, the courts, and politics. It’s a hostile elite — hostile to the traditional people and culture of America.

LASHA  DARKMOON:  In 2000 the 70-year-old Sir Evelyn de Rothschild married affluent businesswoman Lynn Forrester (pictured here). They spent their wedding night at the White House in Washington DC, with Bill Clinton scuttling around serving them drinks and hors d’oeuvres. A year later, on September 11, 2001, the couple hired out the entire top two floors of a 5-star hotel in Manhattan. The hotel had a majestic view of New York.

At 9 am precisely on that fateful morning, September 11, 2001, the lucky couple stepped  out onto their balcony where breakfast was served.  They had ringside seats of the World Trade Center. They could see the Twin Towers glittering in the distance. They could see the first plane approaching through an azure blue sky … and then the fireworks … the explosions … the billowing smoke … and then the second plane approaching …. They could see men and women leaping from the towers … spiraling downward to their deaths on the concrete below.

As they sipped their coffees on the sunny balcony, musing on life and death and sex and shopping, they had the best seats in the house.

KEVIN MACDONALD (summing up) It all boils down to this. Today’s Jewish elite hates the nation it rules.

Is911swastka

“I WOULD NOT BE IN THE LEAST BIT SURPRISED IF THESE PEOPLE
WOULD NOT SOME DAY BECOME DEADLY TO THE HUMAN RACE.”
— Voltaire, 1771

Paul Fromm on the Demise of Free Speech in Canada by Prof. Kevin MacDonald

http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2013/04/paul-fromm-on-the-demise-of-free-speech-in-canada/
Paul Fromm on the Demise of Free Speech in Canada

Paul Fromm CAFE copy

By Kevin MacDonald
April 13, 2013

Paul Fromm, a pro-White activist who writes for his CAFE (Canadian Association for Free Expression) website, has an article on a recent ruling by the Canadian Supreme Court that once again indicates the power of the cultural left at the highest reaches of Western societies “The Whatcott Decision – A Grim Day for Christians and Freedom of Speech“). The case involves a $15000 fine (plus court costs likely to be north of $150,000) imposed on an evangelical Christian who distributed leaflets containing criticism of homosexuality based on Biblical teachings.

WhatcottImage1

Some excerpts and comments:

The decision is pure cultural Marxism. It reflects the triumph of *Frankfurt School* social science which has captured most Western universities. While economic communism collapsed and was defeated, cultural communism was spread by the *Frankfurt School*. Basically, it sees the world divided up into two classes: oppressors – those would be White Christians, and especially sexually healthy White males – and the oppressed – those would be women, homosexuals, Jews, and certain other racial minorities. To overthrow the “oppressors” and to establish universal equality – not of opportunity but results – the *Frankfurt School* targeted loyalty to family, country and religion. There began a concerted campaign of “deconstruction” whereby political heroes, cultural heroes – the dismissal of traditional English literature as the writing of dead, White males – and traditional Christianity were mocked and attacked. These ideas have captured the upper echelons of Canada’s judiciary and bode poorly for freedom of speech.

The Whatcott decision holds that in human rights cases:

· Truth is no defence;?

· Intent is no defence;?

· No harm needs to be proven to have been caused to a “vulnerable” minority;

· A minority is designated as “vulnerable” not because of any evidence – the court admits concrete evidence is often lacking, but on the mere say-so of a human rights commission or court;

· Christians are not protected from hatred as they are not a “vulnerable minority.”

The Court depicts Mr. Whatcott as having the power to intimidate homosexuals. The reality is far different:

Well, where’s the evidence that in the decade since Mr. Whatcott handed out his flyers critical of homosexuals, that “dialogue” was shut down and homosexuals were unable to respond? For nearly 20 years, the powerful homosexual lobby has been pushing for same sex marriage – a revolutionary anti-family retreat from tradition. In 2001, Parliament overwhelmingly voted to endorse the traditional definition of marriage – one man and one woman. The lobby continued its pressure, apparently not intimidated or silenced by the lonely Mr. Whatcott’s leafleting. A cowardly Jean Chretien referred the “question” as to whether the traditional definition of marriage, accepted by almost all but the fringiest elements of Christianity, and by Judaism, Islam, and Hinduism, was “discriminatory” to the judicial revolutionaries on the Supreme Court. They collapsed and gave the homosexual lobby what it wanted. Canada has same-sex marriage.

Despite being a Catholic, Liberal Premier Dalton McGuinty of Ontario forced even Catholic schools to promote the homosexual agenda in the schools and have Gay-Straight Alliance Clubs, even though the practice of homosexuality violates Catholic teaching. (So much for religious freedom!) The homosexual agenda has triumphed in almost every battle. It successfully pressured to have “sexual orientation” added to the privileged groups protected by Sec. 319 of the Criminal Code, Canada’s notorious “hate law.” In fact, there’s no evidence  that Mr. Whatcott’s pathetic little leafleting operation ever intimidated any homosexual from promoting his cause. The only one excluded from the debate is Mr. Whatcott! Mr. Whatcott and strong critics of the homosexual agenda are all but excluded from the mainstream media. Pro-homosexual commentators bray their views from the CBC and the Globe and Mail is virtually a mouthpiece for the homosexual lobby. The only voices marginalized are critics of the homosexual agenda.

Fromm targets the Frankfurt School, a Jewish intellectual movement discussed in Chapter 5 of The Culture of Critique:

Despite calling themselves a “School of Social research,” the Frankfurt School feared any objective research that might challenge their ideology. Like the Supreme Court, they defined the world ideologically, and facts would not be allowed to get in the way:

The Frankfurt School never set out to find out the truth about human behavior and institutions. Instead, its members viewed empirically oriented social science as an aspect of domination and oppression. Horkheimer wrote in 1937 that “if science as a whole follows the lead of empiricism and the intellect renounces its insistent and confident probing of the tangled brush of observations in order to unearth more about the world than even our well-meaning daily press, it will be participating passively in the maintenance of  universal injustice.” Rather than find out how society works, the social scientist must be a critic of culture and adopt an attitude of resistance toward contemporary societies.

The unscientific nature of the enterprise can also be seen in its handling of dissent within the ranks of the Institute—a trend that is a common feature of Jewish intellectual and political movements Erich Fromm was excised from the movement in the 1930s because his leftist humanism opposed the authoritarian nature of the psychoanalyst-patient relationship. This was not compatible with the pro-Bolshevik stance championed at the time by the Horkheimer-Adorno line: Fromm “takes the easy way out with the concept of authority,without which, after all, neither Lenin’s avant-garde nor dictatorship can be conceived of. I would strongly advise him to read Lenin…I must tell you that I see a real threat in this article to the line which the journal takes. (See Chapter 5 of The Culture of Critique.)

One of the most shocking revolutionary conclusions of the Court is that truth should not be a defence, at least in human rights cases: “The lack of defences is not fatal to the constitutionality of the provision. Truthful statements can be presented in a manner that would meet the definition of hate speech, and not all truthful statements must be free from restriction. …

Fromm emphasizes the Jewish role in this decision:

Finally, and this is a delicate topic in oppressive, minority-ruled Canada, let’s look at the makeup of the six judge panel who heard this crucial case about the rights of Christians. Three, yes three, or fully one half of the panel were Jews. Under the regime of employment equity, a Canadian version of anti-White “affirmative action”, invented by, guess who? Madame Justice Rosalie Silberman Abella, who was on the panel, “systemic discrimination” is evidenced by an over-representation or under-representation of a group. It must be remembered that Jews, at about 310,000, constitute less than one per cent of Canada’s population, but made up half of panel in Whatcott! Did their personal views interfere? Ironically, had Justice Abella applied her own “employment equity” she’d have removed herself from the panel in Whatcott as her minority was already heftily over-represented.

abellaFlag_zpsbf55ffb4

The author of this freedom trashing opinion was Mr. Justice Marshall Rothstein of Manitoba. His biography on the Supreme Court website notes: “He served as an adjudicator under the Manitoba Human Rights Act from 1978 to 1983 and as a member of the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal from 1986 to 1992.” In other words, he was, for more than a decade, part of the whole repressive “human rights” industry he was now being invited to critique. In his case, there was more than a “reasonable apprehension of bias.” Perhaps, no surprise he found state censorship and strong criticism of privileged minorities perfectly justified in a “free” [do words mean nothing!] and “democratic society.”

RothsteinHater
At least two Liberal senators, Robina Jaffer and Jim Munson (a former journalist happily at ease with state censorship), in speaking against Bill C-304, which would repeal Sec. 13 (Internet censorship) of the Canadian Human Rights Act quoted Justice Abella and her emphasis on“vulnerable minorities”: to wit: “In a 2009 speech entitled Human Rights and History’s Judgment, Justice Rosalie Abella said: We were supposed to have learned three indelible lessons from the concentration camps of Europe. First, indifference is injustice’s incubator. Second, it’s not just what you stand for, it’s is what you stand up for. And third, we must never forget how the world looks to those who are vulnerable.’” Justice Abella was also part of the human rights industry having served on the Ontario Human Rights Commission. Her biography on the Supreme Court website notes: “She married Canadian historian Irving M. Abella on December 8, 1968.” Irving Abella is a past president of the Canadian Jewish Congress, a pro-censorship intervener in Whatcott. The CJC has been a long-time and strident supporter of anti-free speech “hate laws”. Again, one might wonder why Justice Abella did not recuse herself from this case is there is more than a “reasonable apprehension of bias.”

It is certainly true that the organized Jewish community has been a strong  voice supporting laws curtailing free speech, not just in Canada, but throughout the Western world (see “The Hate Crimes Prevention Bill: Why Do Jewish Organizations Support It?“). Irving Abella’s book was cited in my chapter on the Jewish role in promoting immigration. Although the chapter emphasizes the Jewish role in altering U.S. immigration policy in favor of non-Whites, the Jewish community played a similar role throughout the West, including Canada:

In the case of Canada, Abella (A Coat of Many Colors: Two Centuries of Jewish Life in Canada; 1990, 234–235) notes the important contribution of Jews in bringing about a multicultural Canada and, in particular, in lobbying for more liberal immigration policies. Reflecting this attitude, Arthur Roebuck, attorney general of Ontario, was greeted “with thunderous applause” at a 1935 convention for the Zionist Organization of Canada [dedicated to a  Jewish ethnostate] when he stated that he looked “forward to the time when our economic conditions will be less severe than they are today and when we may open wide the gates, throw down the restrictions and make of Canada a Mecca for all the oppressed peoples of the world” (in M. Brown 1987, 256).

Abella also co-authored a book, None Is Too Many that was critical of Canada for not admitting Jewish refugees in the World War II era. The title comes from a statement of a senior Canadian immigration official that summed up Canadian policy.

Thus we have Jewish activists involved in academic research on Jewish issues. And perhaps more importantly, Jewish activists are involved in court decisions that reflect consensus views within the Jewish community on issues related to free speech, multiculturalism, and immigration. The hostile elite in action.

—–