The Degeneration of the Jewish Soul by Douglas Reed

degenjewishsoul-copy

atrpeditor300

[Editor’s Preface: The following article, “The Jewish Soul”, is the 45th Chapter of Douglas Reed’s classic work on political Zionism The Controversy of ZionMy reason for publishing it as a stand alone article is primarily due to the critical state of global affairs at this point in world history; a condition which, as Reed outlined in minute detail 60 years ago, is the direct result of the role and intent of the Talmudic mindset of  the majority of 20th century world Jewry.

It has become the fashion today among those opposed to the Zionist agenda to lump all Jews into one basket and assume that every Jew is automatically a supporter of Israel and the Talmudic agenda for global governance. Reed’s article gives the reader a glimpse of how the Talmudic tyranny of the Zionists was able to influence not only Jews outside of Israel but also non-Jews into accepting their perception that every Jew ought to be perceived as a Zionist.

Upon reading this chapter it is hoped that the reader will have a better grasp of how the movers and shakers within the Zionist movement were able to utilize their planned scheme for global dominance, i.e., the intentional creation of WWI and WWII and the subsequent creation of their “Jewish” state of Israel as means to their final objective – the destruction of both Christianity and Islam and the final assumption of Talmudic “Law” within the context of a one world totalitarian dictatorship.

Back in November of 1956 when he completed the final draft of his major opus on the subject of the Jews and the influence of the Talmud mindset upon the spiritual and political consciousness of 20th century World Jewry Reed foretold a future that, for those of us living today, is now a clear and present reality.]

THE JEWISH SOUL 

By Douglas Reed

douglasreedframedphoto500-copy-2

The first fifty years of “the Jewish century” have had their natural effect on the Jewish soul, which once again is in violent unrest. They have made chauvinists of a mass of Jews who, a hundred and fifty years ago, seemed committed to involvement in mankind. They are once more in captivity (the recurrent “captivities” of the Jews were always captivity by the elders and their creed of exclusion, not by alien taskmasters). In the Zionist captivity, and under the pressure of the elders, they have been made into the most explosive force in recorded history. The story of this century, of its wars and revolutions and the denouement yet to come, is that of Talmudic chauvinism, which has its roots in Deuteronomy.

The very word, chauvinism, means an extravagant emotion; Nicolas Chauvin was the Napoleonic soldier whose bombastic and unbridled fervour for his Emperor brought patriotism into disrepute even at a period of patriotic ardour. Nevertheless, the word is inadequate to describe the effect of Talmudic Zionism on the Jewish soul; no word exists, other than “Talmudism,” for this unique and boundless frenzy.

In 1933 Mr. Bernard J. Brown wrote, “Being consciously Jewish is the lowest kind of chauvinism, for it is the only chauvinism that is based on false premises.” The premises are those of the Talmud-Torah; namely, that God promised a certain tribe supremacy over all enslaved others in this world, and exclusive inheritance of the next world in return for strict observance of a law based on blood sacrifice and the destruction or enslavement of the lesser breeds without this Law. Whether Talmudic chauvinism or Zionist chauvinism (I believe either term is more correct than Mr. Brown’s “Jewish chauvinism”) is or is not “the lowest kind” of chauvinism, these fifty years have shown that it is the most violent kind yet known to man.

h-morgenthausr

Its effect on the Jewish soul is reflected in the changed tone of Jewish literature in our time. Before adducing examples of this, an illustration of its effect between one generation and the next may be given by briefly citing the cases of two Jews, father and son. Mr. Henry Morgenthau senior was a notable Jew of America who became an ambassador. He was the product of Jewish emancipation during the last century; he was what the Jews today might have been, but for Talmudic chauvinism. He said:

“Zionism is the most stupendous fallacy in Jewish history. I assert that it is wrong in principle and sterile in its spiritual ideas. Zionism is a betrayal, an Eastern European proposal, fathered in this country by American Jews … which, if they were to succeed, would cost the Jews of America most of what they have gained of liberty, equality and fraternity. I refuse to allow myself to be called a Zionist. I am an American.”

In the next generation the name of the son, Mr. Henry Morgenthau junior, became inseparably associated with the founding of the Zionist state (his father’s “stupendous fallacy”) and with the Talmudic vengeance in Europe. In the sequel the son might prove to be one of the men most responsible for bringing about the consequences which the father feared.

h-morgenthaujr

Dr. Weizmann records the great part played by the junior Mr. Morgenthau in the backstage drama in New York which culminated in the violent establishment of the Zionist state and an American president’s “recognition” of the deed. In Europe he fathered (through the “Morgenthau Plan” de) the bisection of the continent and the advance of the revolution to its middle. Some passages in that plan (initialled by Messrs. Roosevelt and Churchill, who both repudiated it when the damage was done) are of especial significance, namely, those which propose that “all industrial plants and equipment not destroyed by military action” (in Germany) “shall be … completely destroyed … and the mines wrecked.” The original source of this idea of “utter destruction” apparently can only be the Talmud-Torah, where it is part of the “Law of God.” The Zionist state itself, as I have shown, was founded on a deed of “utter destruction,” and thus of literal “observance” of this Law, at Deir Yasin.

deir_yassinreed

But for Zionist chauvinism and the Western politicos who served it in the office of “administrators,” the son might have been another such man as the father, and this particular illustration is valid for a great mass of Jews and the change which has been produced in the Jewish soul. When Jews of great name lent themselves to such undertakings, and proved able to command the support of American presidents and British prime ministers, the Jewish masses were bound to follow. This general trend is reflected in the growing literature of Talmudic chauvinism.

Up to the middle of the last century distinctively “Jewish” literature was small and was in the main produced for and read in the closed communities. In the general bookshops Jewish writers held a place roughly proportionate to their numbers in the population, which was the natural thing, and in their works did not in the rule write as “Jews” or dwell on the exclusively Jewish theme. They addressed themselves to the general audience and avoided the chauvinist appeal to Jews, as well as anything that non-Jews might regard as blasphemy, sedition, obscenity or slander.

The transformation that has come about in the last fifty years reflects equally the spread of Talmudic chauvinism and the enforced subordination of the non-Jewish masses to it. Today books by Jews and non-Jews about Jewish things, if they were counted, might be found to form the largest single body of Western literature, outside fiction, and the change in tone and standard is very great.

As it has come about gradually, and critical comment today is in practice virtually forbidden as “anti-semitic,” the change has not been consciously remarked by the mass of people. Its extent may be measured by this comparison; a good deal of what is contained in the literature of Talmudic chauvinism today (a few examples follow) would not have been published at all fifty years ago, as offensive to the standards then generally accepted. Fear of critical and public anathema would have kept publishers from issuing many of these works, or at all events from including in them the most flagrant passages.

The starting-point of this process, which might be called one of degeneration in Jewry, was possibly the appearance in 1895 of Max Nordau’s Degeneration, which struck the keynote for the chorus to come. This book was in effect an epistle to the Gentiles, informing them that they were degenerate, and it enjoyed great vogue with fin de siècle “Liberals,” as the accumulating mass of kindred literature has enjoyed among their kind ever since. Jewish degeneracy was no part of its theme, and the author would have seen Jewish degeneracy only in opposition to Zionism, for he was Herzl’s lieutenant, and the man who at the Zionist Congress after Herzl’s death foretold the first World War and the part played in it by England in setting up the Zionist “homeland.” Degeneration was significant both in time and theme; it appeared in the same year as Herzl’s The Jewish State and this was also the year of the first revolutionary outbreak in Russia. The revolution and Zionism are both essential to the Deuteronomic Talmudic concept, and both movements, in my estimate, were developed under Talmudic direction.

After Degeneration followed the full tide and spate of Talmudic-chauvinist literature. An example from our time is a book published in New York in the year, 1941, when Hitler and Stalin fell out and America entered the Second War. Germany Must Perish!, by a Mr. Theodore N. Kaufmann, proposed the extermination of the German people in the literal sense of the Law of the Talmud-Torah. Mr. Kaufmann proposed that “German extinction” be achieved by sterilizing all Germans of procreation age (males under 60, females under 45) within a period of three years after the war’s end, Germany to be sealed off during the process and its territory then to be shared among other people, so that it should disappear from the map together with its people. Mr. Kaufmann calculated that, with births stopped through sterilization, the normal death rate would extinguish the German race within fifty or sixty years.

germanymustperishmed

I feel sure that public abhorrence would have deterred any publisher from issuing this work during the First War, and possibly at any previous time since printing was invented. In 1941 it appeared with the commendation of two leading American newspapers (both Jewish-owned or Jewish-controlled). The New York Times described the proposal as “a plan for permanent peace among civilized nations”; the Washington Post called it “a provocative theory, interestingly presented.”

germanymustperishbackmed

 

“The hatred evinced was not limited to Germans; it extended to Arabs and for a period to the British; as it had earlier been directed against Spaniards, Russians, Poles and others. It was not a personal thing; being the end-product of Talmudic teaching it ranged impartially over all things non-Judaist, taking first one symbolic enemy and then another from a world where, under the Levitical Law, all were enemies.”

This proposal was more literally Talmudic than anything else I can find, but the spirit that prompted it breathed in many other books. The hatred evinced was not limited to Germans; it extended to Arabs and for a period to the British; as it had earlier been directed against Spaniards, Russians, Poles and others. It was not a personal thing; being the end-product of Talmudic teaching it ranged impartially over all things non-Judaist, taking first one symbolic enemy and then another from a world where, under the Levitical Law, all were enemies.

The growth and open expression of this violent feeling, no longer held in bounds by the earlier need to take account of generally-accepted standards in the West, explains the misgivings expressed by Mr. Brown in 1933, by the Rabbi Elmer Berger in the 1940’s, and by Mr. Alfred Lilienthal in the present decade. Its reflection in the Jewish published word justified their anxiety. In one book after another Jewish writers with introspective writings examined “the Jewish soul” and at the end came up with expressions of contempt or hatred for somebody or other of non-Jews, couched in chauvinist terms.

Mr. Arthur Koestler, describing his scrutiny of Judaism, wrote, “Most bewildering of all was the discovery that the saga of the ‘Chosen Race’ seemed to be taken quite literally by traditionalist Jews. They protested against racial discrimination, and affirmed in the same breath their racial superiority based on Jacob’s covenant with God.” The effect of this “bewildering discovery” on this particular Jewish soul was that “the more I found out about Judaism the more distressed I became, and the more fervently Zionist.”

The presumable cause (“reason” cannot be used to describe so illogical a reaction) of this strange effect on Mr. Koestler is indicated by his two hundred pages of complaint about Jews being persecuted in and driven from Europe. He avoided this complaint of justice by his assumption that the Arabs, who were not to blame, should suffer, depicting an Arab family (persecuted in and driven from Palestine by the Zionists) in these words: “The old woman will walk ahead leading the donkey by the rein and the old man will ride on it … sunk in solemn meditation about the lost opportunity of raping his youngest grandchild.” In this depictment the acts of persecution and driving-out are made to appear respectable, others than Jews being the sufferers, by the attribution of a revolting thought to the victim.

The change in the tone and standards of Jewish literature in our time is again shown by the writings of Mr. Ben Hecht, some of which were earlier quoted, including his complaint that if Jesus had only been made into mincemeat, instead of being dignified by crucifixion, Christianity would never have taken shape. I doubt whether newspapers or publishers at any previous period would have given currency to words which patently had only the purpose of offending others.

Mr. Hecht once wrote, “I lived forty years in my country” (America) “without encountering anti-semitism or concerning myself even remotely with its existence.” Therefore Mr. Hecht logically intended to live nowhere else. Nevertheless, when the Zionist state was being set up, he wrote that every time a British soldier was killed in Palestine “the Jews of America make a little holiday in their hearts.”

Deep, if not enlightening insight into the development of the Jewish soul during this century is given by the books of a Mr. Meyer Levine; these also contain things which, in my estimation, would not have found print in earlier times. Mr. Levine’s In Search shows what Mr. Sylvain Lévi meant when, at the 1919 Peace Conference, he gave warning against the “explosive tendencies” of the Eastern Jews.

Mr. Levine, born in America of immigrant parents from Eastern Europe was reared to hatred of Russians and Poles. He seems to have found little to please him in “the new country” where he was born and when he grew to young manhood busied himself in agitation among the Chicago workers.

He tells of half a lifetime of tortured efforts to escape from Jewishness and to immerse himself in Jewishness, alternately. If some Jews believe themselves unchangeably distinct from all other mankind, Mr. Levine gives two glimpses which make the reader feel that this belief is the product of a strained, almost mystic perversity. He says he finds himself constantly asking himself “What am I?” and “What am I doing here?,” and asserts that “Jews everywhere are asking the same questions.” Subsequently he related some of the discoveries to which this self-scrutiny led him.

Describing the Leopold-Loeb murder in Chicago (when two young Jews, of wealthy parents, killed and mutilated a small boy, also a Jew, from motives of extreme morbidity) he says, “I believe that beneath the very real horror that the case inspired, the horror in realizing that human beings carried in them murderous motives beyond the simple motives of lust and greed and hatred, beneath all this was a suppressed sense of pride in the brilliance of these boys, a sympathy for them in being slaves of their intellectual curiosities; a pride that this particular new level of crime, even this should have been reached by Jews. In a confused and awed way, and in the momentary fashionableness of ‘lust for experience,’ I felt that I understood them, that I, particularly, being a young intellectual Jew, had a kinship with them.”

On another occasion he describes his part (he calls it that of “a volunteer aid,” but the-term “agitator” might be fairly applicable) in the Chicago steelworkers strike of 1937, when strikers and police came into conflict and shots were fired, several persons being killed. Mr. Levine, as “a volunteer aid,” had “fallen in alongside” the strikers’ procession and he “ran with the others” when the firing began. He was not a steelworker or striker. Subsequently he and others, apparently also volunteer aids, organized a mass meeting. At this he showed slides made from newspaper-pictures from which he had removed the descriptions. He accompanied these pictures with a recital of his own, in words chosen to give the pictures an inflammatory interpretation, different from that of the original captions. He says:

“So strange a roar arose that it seemed to me as though the vast auditorium was a cauldron of rage, overturning upon me … I felt I could never control the crowd, that they would burst through the doors, rush out and burn the city hall – the impact of the pictures was so enraging … In that instant I experienced the full sense of the danger of power, for I felt that a few words would have unleashed violence beyond what we had seen on Memorial Day … If I had sometimes felt unincluded as a stranger, artist and Jew, I knew that universal action exists … I felt that perhaps one of the reasons for the social reformism of the Jew is the need to melt himself into these movements that engulf his own problem.”

Once again, the words recall Mr. Maurice Samuel’s lament or menace, (whichever was intended) of 1924, “We Jews, the destroyers, will remain the destroyers forever.” Only in the incitement of others, Mr. Levine appears to say, could he, the “stranger,” feel himself “included,” or “his problem” engulfed. The incitement of the unreasoning, stupid “mob” is the theme that runs through the “Protocols” of 1905. In the passage quoted Mr. Levine seemed to imply that he could only feel involvement in general mankind when so inciting a mob.

His later travels were made in the same spirit. In his youth Zionism was almost unknown and in 1925, when he was twenty, it was still “a question that had scarcely penetrated to Jews born in America … It was something that occupied the bearded ones from the old country and if an American Jew happened to be dragged to a Zionist meeting he found that the speakers talked with Russian accents, or simply reverted to Yiddish. My own family, indeed, had no interest in the movement.”

As in the case of the Morgenthaus, father and son, one generation saw the change. Mr. Levine’s parents, migrants from a country of alleged “persecution,” were content to have found another where they prospered. The son was not content. Soon he was in Palestine, and developed vengeful feelings towards the Arabs of whom he had never heard in his youth. He tells, as a good jest, of an incident in a Zionist settlement when an Arab, coming across the fields, humbly asked for a drink of water. Mr. Levine and his friends pointed to a barrel, at which the Arab thankfully drank while they laughed; it was the horse-water.

Ten years after that he was in Germany and played his part in the Talmudic vengeance there. He was an American newspaper correspondent and describes how he and another Jewish correspondent roamed about Germany as “conquerors,” armed (illicitly), in a jeep, looting and wrecking as they pleased. He then says that the passive submission of German women to the “conquerors” thwarted the furious desire to rape them and “sometimes the hatred in a man rose so high that he felt the absolute need of violence.” In this mood, his companion and he swore that “the only thing to do was to throw them down, tear them apart,” and they discussed “the ideal conditions for such a scene of violence; there would have to be a wooded stretch of road, little traffic, and a lone girl on foot or a bicycle.” The pair then made “a tentative sally” in search of these “ideal conditions” and at length found a lonely girl and “the conditions, all fulfilled.” (He says the terrified girl was spared at the last and wonders if the reason, in each man, was that the presence of the other embarrassed him).

Mr. Levine began his book of 1950, “This is a book about being a Jew.” It and the many like it account for the anxiety expressed by the rare Jewish remonstrants about the development of the last fifty years, for they testify to the degeneration of the Jewish soul under the stress of Talmudic chauvinism. The only thing proved by the book is that at its end Mr. Levine knew as little as at the start of his quest about what “being a Jew” meant (presumably he would not wish the above-quoted passages to be taken as supplying the answer). Hundreds of others on this same elusive and unproductive theme have appeared; so might an electric eel devour its own tail in search of the source of its peculiar sensation, and come to no enlightening conclusion. A book by a Jew on being a human being among other human beings was by the mid-century rare.

The accumulating literature of incitement and hatred, of which a few examples have been given, and the virtual suppression of objection to it as “anti-semitism,” give the 20th century its distinctive character; it is the age of Talmudic chauvinism and Talmudic imperialism. Our present situation was foretold nearly a hundred years ago by a German, Wilhelm Marr.

wilhelm-marr

Marr was a revolutionary and conspirator who helped the Jewish-led “secret societies” (Disraeli) prepare the abortive outbreaks of 1848. His writings of that period are recognizably Talmudic (he was not a Jew); they are violently anti-Christian, atheist and anarchist. Later, like Bakunin (Marr was a similar man) he became aware of the true nature of the revolutionary hierarchy, and in 1879 he wrote:

“The advent of Jewish imperialism, I am firmly convinced, is only a question of time … The empire of the world belongs to the Jews … Woe to the conquered! … I am quite certain that before four generations have passed there will not be a single function in the State, the highest included, which will not be in the hands of the Jews … At the present moment, alone among European states, Russia still holds out against the official recognition of the invading foreigners. Russia is the last rampart and against her the Jews have constructed their final trench. To judge by the course of events, the capitulation of Russia is only a question of time … In that vast empire … Judaism will find the fulcrum of Archimedes which will enable it to drag the whole of Western Europe off its hinges once for all. The Jewish spirit of intrigue will bring about a revolution in Russia such as the world has never yet seen … The present situation of Judaism in Russia is such that it has still to fear expulsion. But when it has laid Russia prostrate it will no longer have any attacks to fear. When the Jews have got control of the Russian state … they will set about the destruction of the social organization of Western Europe. This last hour of Europe will arrive at latest in a hundred or a hundred and fifty years.”

The present state of Europe, as it has been left by the Second War, shows this forecast to have been largely fulfilled. Indeed, only the full denouement remains, for its complete fulfilment. As to that, Marr may have seen too darkly. The history of the world thus far knows no irrevocable decisions, decisive victories, permanent conquests or absolute weapons. The last word, so far, has always proved to lie with the New Testamentary dictum: “The end is not yet.”

However, the last stage in Marr’s forecast, the third act in the 20th Century drama, is evidently at hand, whatever its outcome and whatever its subsequent aftermath, and in preparation for it the Jewish soul has been made captive by Talmudic chauvinism once again. Mr. George Sokolsky, the notable Jewish diarist of New York, observed in January 1956 that, “There was considerable opposition” (to Zionism) “inside world Jewry, but over the years the opposition died down and where it still exists it is so unpopular as generally to be hidden away; in the United States opposition to Israel among Jews is negligible.”

The few warning voices which are still being raised, like Jeremiah’s of old, are nearly all those of Jews. The reason is not that non-Jewish writers are worse informed, shorter sighted or less courageous; it has long been the unwritten rule that Jewish objectors may within limits be heard, as they are of “ourselves,” but that objection from non-Jews must not be tolerated.[*] In the condition of the Western press today, in the third quarter of the 20th century, this rule is enforced almost without exception.

On this account the few warnings here quoted are Jewish ones. Mr. Frank Chodorov told the American Government (Human Events, March 10, 1956) that in the Middle East “in reality it is not dealing with the government of Israel but with American Jews … It is a certainty that many good, loyal Americans of the Jewish faith would welcome a showdown, not only to register their loyalty to this country and against world Zionism, but also to loosen the grip the Zionists have on them.”

Similarly, Mr. Alfred Lilienthal (Human Events, September 10, 1955) echoed the despairing plea of the late Mr. James Forrestal eight years before; as the shadow of the 1956 presidential election fell across America he, too, begged the two great political parties, when they joined conflict, “to take the Arab-Israeli issue out of domestic politics.” Both these Jewish warnings appeared in a Washington newsletter of repute but small circulation; the mass-circulation newspapers were closed to them.

Other latterday Jewish remonstrants raised the ancient cry of a coming “catastrophe.” In 1933 Mr. Bernard J. Brown had seen disaster coming: “Never in the history of the human race has there ever been a group of people who have enmeshed themselves into so many errors and persisted in refusing to see the truth, as our people have done during the last three hundred years” (the period which saw the emergence of the Talmudic “Eastern Jews” and the victorious Talmudist war against Jewish assimilation).

Fifteen years after that warning Jewish remonstrants were pronouncing the word which it only implied: “catastrophe.” Rabbi Elmer Berger wrote in 1951, “Unless Americans of Jewish faith and a great many Americans of other faiths who have been misguided into supporting Zionism return to the fundamentals both of American life and of Judaism we are headed for something of a catastrophe.”

“This claim of the right of American Jews to refuse amalgamation is building towards a crisis which may have lamentable consequences. Already it is becoming clear that every time Israel gets in a jam (and many of its policies, especially with regard to economics and immigration, seem almost designed to produce jams) American Jews will be expected to high-pressure the United States government to step in and straighten matters out. Zionist leaders have not hesitated to carry this sort of thing to the extremes of political blackmail. This can continue for a little while because of our peculiar electoral system … but New York is not the United States, and if this sort of strong-arm intervention in behalf of a foreign state keeps up, look out for an explosion.”

– Dr. Paul Hutchinson, editor of The Christian Century

The foreword to Rabbi Berger’s book was written by a non-Jewish authority, Dr. Paul Hutchinson, editor of The Christian Century. He was more explicit: “This claim of the right of American Jews to refuse amalgamation is building towards a crisis which may have lamentable consequences. Already it is becoming clear that every time Israel gets in a jam (and many of its policies, especially with regard to economics and immigration, seem almost designed to produce jams) American Jews will be expected to high-pressure the United States government to step in and straighten matters out. Zionist leaders have not hesitated to carry this sort of thing to the extremes of political blackmail” (this was written many years before ex-President Truman in his memoirs confirmed the fact). “This can continue for a little while because of our peculiar electoral system … but New York is not the United States, and if this sort of strong-arm intervention in behalf of a foreign state keeps up, look out for an explosion.”

These warnings, though clear to Jews, might produce in non-Jewish minds the false impression that “the Jews” are headed towards “a catastrophe” of their own making; that in that event Talmudic chauvinism will recoil on their own heads; and, schliesslich, that they will then only have themselves to thank. The smug and the rancorous, especially, might fall into this delusion.

Delusion it would be. That recurrent phenomenon of history-as-it-is-written, “the Jewish catastrophe,” is invariably the small Jewish share in a general catastrophe, the proportion being, say, around one percent of the total woe. The monstrous prevarication of the Second War about the “six million Jews who perished” does not change that enduring truth. The catastrophe which has been brewed in these fifty years will be a general one, and the Jewish share of it will be fractional. It will be depicted as “a Jewish catastrophe,” as the Second War was so depicted, but that is the false picture shown on the lighted screen to “the mob” in its dark room.

Jews often, and quite genuinely, cannot envisage a calamity involving Jews, and no matter how many more non-Jews, as anything but “a Jewish catastrophe.” This is a mental attitude deriving from the original teaching of the Talmud-Torah, wherein the chosen people alone have true existence and the others are shadows or cattle. Mr. Karl Stern’s book, Pillar of Fire, provides an illustration.

Mr. Stern (a Jew who grew up in Germany between the wars, went to Canada and there was converted to the Catholic faith) says that there was in the Jewish youth Movement in Germany in the 1920’s “a general mood which seemed to point at events which later came to pass. Latent in the situation were sorrows, questions and doubts pointing towards the great Jewish catastrophe – or rather the great European catastrophe with which the fate of the Jews was interwoven in so mysterious a fashion.”

In this passage the truth appears in an obvious, corrective afterthought, which would not occur to or be expressed by the run of Jewish writers. Mr. Stern’s is an exceptional case, and when he had written the words “the great Jewish catastrophe” he saw their untruth and qualified them; nevertheless, even he left the original statement to stand. The influence of his heredity and upbringing were still strong enough in him, a Catholic in North America, to form his first thought in those terms: the ordeal of 350,000,000 souls in Europe, which has left nearly half of them enslaved, was “the great Jewish catastrophe.”

In a different case Mr. Stern would be the first to object to such a presentation. Indeed, he relates that he was offended by reading in a Catholic paper the statement that so-many members of the crew of a sunken British submarine were “Catholics.” He was affronted because one group of the victims was singled out in this way; “I do not understand why anyone would care for such statistics.” And yet: “the great Jewish catastrophe …”

The “catastrophe,” involving all, which has been prepared in these fifty years, will not be distinctively Jewish in the predominance of Jewish suffering, but in its domination, once again, by “the Jewish question,” by the effort to subordinate all the energy generated to aims represented to be Jewish, and in the use of the Jewish masses to help detonate it. The Jewish mass, or mob, is in one respect different from any other mob, or mass: it is more prone to surrender itself to chauvinist incitement, and more frenzied in this surrender. The Jewish Encyclopaedia, in a small section devoted to the subject of hysteria among Jews, affirms that their tendency towards it is higher than average. As a layman, I would hazard the guess that this is the result of the centuries of close confinement in the ghettoes and of Talmudic absolutism in them (for today we have to do almost exclusively with the “Eastern Jews” who but yesterday lived in those confines).

I have given some examples of this rising wave of chauvinist hysteria from literature accessible to the general reader. This shows the results, but not the root cause. To locate that the reader needs to do something more difficult; namely, attentively to follow the Yiddish and Hebrew press, in the original or in translation. Then he will receive the picture of an almost demoniac scourging of the Jewish soul so that it shall never find rest and he might conclude that nowhere outside Jewry is anything so anti-Jewish to be found as in some of these utterances, which show a scientific mastery of methods of implanting and fostering fear.

Before studying the examples which follow the reader might consider that the great mass of “explosive Eastern Jews” is now in America. This fact, more pregnant with possible consequences than any other of our day, seems scarcely to have entered the consciousness of the Western world, or even of America. The extracts which now follow show what is said in Hebrew and Yiddish (that is, outside the aural range of the non-Jew) among the Jewish masses, and the effect produced on them within the short space of five years.

Mr. Willian Zukerman, one of the most notable Jewish diarists of America and of our time, in May 1950 published an article called “Raising the Hair of the Jewish People” (South African Jewish Times of May 19, 1950; I imagine it also appeared in Jewish publications in many countries). He began by saying, “A great debate is on in the Zionist world. As yet it has not reached the non-Jewish, or even English-Jewish press; but it is raging in the Hebrew newspapers in Israel and in the Yiddish press in America and in Europe … it reveals, as nothing else has done in recent years, a cross-section of Jewish thought and emotions in the period following the emergence of Israel.” The debate, he explained, was “on the question of Chalutziot; organized and prepared emigration of Jews to Israel from all over the world – but particularly from the United States.”

At that time (1950) Mr. Zukerman wrote with only an undertone of foreboding. He quoted Mr. Sholem Niger, “dean of Yiddish literary critics and essayists,” as attacking, not “the campaign for emigration of American Jews to Israel,” but “the manner in which it is being presented to American Jews …” This, said Mr. Niger, was entirely negative, being anti-all others rather than pro-Israel: “the nationalists conduct a campaign of negation, vilification and destruction of everything Jewish outside Israel. Jewish life in the United States and everywhere else in the world is depicted as contemptible and hateful … Everything Jewish outside Israel is declared to be slavish, undignified, suppressed and dishonourable. No Jew with any self-respect can live fully as a Jew in the United States or anywhere else except in Israel is the major contention of the nationalists in this debate.”

Another favourite technique in selling Chalutziot to American Jews (the article continued) “is to undermine Jewish morale, faith and hope in their American home; to keep Jews constantly on edge with the scare of anti-semitism; not to let them forget the Hitler horrors and to spread doubts, fear and despair about the future of Jews in America. Every manifestation of anti-semitism is being seized upon and exaggerated to create an impression that American Jews, like the Germans under Hitler, stand on the brink of a catastrophe, and that sooner or later they, too, will have to run for safety.”

Mr. Niger quoted as example from an article by “a leading Israeli Zionist, Jonah Kossoi, in a highly literary Jerusalem Hebrew journal, Israel”:

“Upon us, Zionists, now lies the old responsibility of constantly raising the hair of the Jewish people; not to let them rest; to keep them forever on the edge of a precipice and make them aware of the dangers facing them. We must not wait until after the ‘catastrophe’ because if we do, where will we take the hundreds of thousands of Jews needed to build up our State? … Not in the future, but right now is the time for Jews to save themselves …”

The reader will see: the “catastrophe” is a political necessity, or an inevitability; and from these extracts he may begin to understand why the Jewish Encyclopaedia records a tendency towards hysteria among Jews. Mr. Zukerman said that this “extreme form of Chalutziot propaganda is the most prevalent one in Israel now.” He quoted a “more moderate form of the theory” expounded by Mr. L. Jefroikin, editor of the Zionist Kiyum in Paris. Mr. Jefroikin, said Mr. Zukerman, “while he subscribes to the truth of every word of the nationalistic theory that no Jew can live a full and dignified life anywhere else but in Israel, and while he too says that ‘American Jews live in a fool’s paradise,’ nevertheless admits that in their present state of mind American Jews will never agree that the U.S.A. is to be placed in the same category as Germany and Poland and that they would not consent to regard their home as a place of transit for Israel. He concludes, therefore, that American Jews should be propagandized to become only ‘Lovers of Israel,’ not actual Israelis in body and soul.”

The effect of this “propaganda” carried by Zionist emissaries from Israel into the United States, may next be studied in some remarks printed eighteen months later (December 1951) in the Intermountain Jewish News of Denver, Colorado. Its editor, Mr. Robert Gamzey, was critical of the action of the Jewish Agency and the World Zionist Congress for allocating $2,800,000 to promote Chalutziot in the United States. He said he knew “from personal experience in Israel of the widespread erroneous attitude there that America has no future for the Jews and that anti-semitism dooms U.S. Jewry to the fate of German Jews.” He added, “It is inconceivable therefore that the sending of Israel emissaries here to encourage American youth to settle in Israel would be conducted in any other way but to deride and deprecate the future of American Judaism.”

These forebodings of 1950 and 1951 were justified in the next five years, when “the campaign” and “the emissaries” from Israel succeeded in injecting “the nationalistic theory,” as above expounded, into the minds of the Jewish masses in America. Thus in 1955, Mr. William Zukerman, who in 1950 had been but faintly alarmed, was greatly so. He wrote (Jewish Newsletter, November 1955, reprinted in Time Magazine of New York, November 28):

“There cannot be the slightest doubt that a state of mind very much like that of Israel now prevails among American Jews. There is a fanatical certainty abroad, that there is only one truth and that Israel is the sole custodian of it. No distinction is made between the Jews of the world and Israel, and not even between the Israeli government and Israel. Israeli statesmen and their policies are assumed to be inviolate and above criticism. There is a frightening intolerance of opinions differing from those of the majority, a complete disregard of reason, and a yielding to the emotions of a stampeding herd.

“There is only one important difference between the Israeli and the American Jews. In Israel, the outburst of emotionalism, as far as one can judge from outside, has a basis in reality. It wells from the hidden springs of a disillusioned people who were promised security and peace and find themselves in a war trap. The American-Jewish brand of hysteria is entirely without roots in the realities of American-Jewish life. It is completely artificial, manufactured by the Zionist leaders, and foisted on a people who have no cause for hysteria by an army of paid propagandists as a means of advancing a policy of avowed political pressure and of stimulating fund raising. Never before has a propaganda campaign in behalf of a foreign government been planned and carried out more blatantly and cynically, in the blaze of limelight and to the fanfare of publicity, than the present wave of hysteria now being worked up among American Jews.”

These two quotations, separated by five years, again portray the degeneration of the Jewish soul under the tutelage of Talmudic Zionism. They also bring this tale of three wars to the eve of the third one, if “eve” is the apt word. In fact the third war began when the fighting in the Second War ended and has been in unbroken progress, somewhere or other in the world, ever since. It needs only a puff from any bellows to ignite it into another general war.

The process could have been, and possibly still could be halted by two responsible statesmen, one on either side of the Atlantic, speaking in unison, for it is in essense the biggest bluff in history. Today such mortal salvation seems too much to hope for and the writer probably does not exaggerate in opining that only God, who has done much bigger things, could avert the third general war. Unless that happens the concluding decades of this century foreseeably will see either the fiasco or the transient triumph of Talmudic chauvinism. Either way, in failure or success, the accompanying “catastrophe” would be that of the non-Jewish masses and Jewish suffering would be a minute fraction of it.

Afterwards, as the world obviously will not accept the Talmud, the Jews would at last have to accept the world as it is.

University of Lethbridge Suspension of Tenured Professor Lacks Due Diligence Dr. M. R. Islam

http://www.thecanadiancharger.com/page.php?id=5&a=2021

October 17, 2016

University of Lethbridge Suspension of Tenured Professor Lacks Due Diligence

Dr. M. R. Islam

More by this author…

anthony-hall

No one should be under the illusion that University of Lethbridge president Dr. Mike Mahon is giving the case of suspended professor Dr. Anthony Hall proper legal procedure and due diligence.

In case anyone wonders what “due diligence” actually means, it’s about impartially following the rules set out in the university’s Board-Faculty Association Collective Agreement, not just calling a meeting or two to air opinions.

A tenured professor cannot be suspended as a precautionary measure, “just in case” something went wrong. One doesn’t need a lawyer to understand this. One does need conscience, ethical principles and the ability to actually read and interpret the articles of a collective agreement.

Accusations by special-interest groups are levelled against academics all the time, not only concerning their research – which may upset prevailing biases and mindsets – but also to cast aspersions on their character. In a democratic society such accusations don’t form a legitimate basis for even starting an investigation.

In the case of a professor supposedly teaching falsehoods in class, the basis for factually determining truth or lies must be scrutinized at ground level. University presidents have no business interfering with the process, and for good reason.

How on earth can the president of an academic institution know if a professor’s course material is false? Unless the president happens to be a specialist in the same discipline as the professor being criticized (and such is not the case with the University of Lethbridge situation), that individual is at a distant arm’s length of the lecture-hall.

It is the community of professors themselves, not top-down administrators, who are vocationally mandated to seek and define truth. That’s the whole point of having a tenure process. Allowing administrators such as Dr. Mike Mahon to take unilateral punitive action due to subjectively-driven external complaints is akin to allowing a Parliament Hill custodian dictate House of Commons protocol.

A little history is in order when considering the value and necessity of due process.

When Phillippe Rushton, a former University of Western Ontario professor whose theories on race and genetics raised heated controversy in 1989, was discovered to have benefited in his research from the financial support of white supremacist groups, the court of public opinion wanted him fired on the spot. That was not allowed to happen.

Although Rushton (who died in 2012) had few influential defenders, “due process” meant that he was subjected to the same annual academic evaluation as anyone else on faculty, where the protocol would be to suspend a professor after a series of failing scores on criteria covering a wide range of academic and pedagogical criteria.

Despite the hue and cry around Rushton’s case, people were decent back then; they understood he was being targeted for a reason other than “academic failure.” Rushton left active teaching of his own volition and continued on in his research for nearly a quarter-century without any further controversy. His published opinions and findings on racial and gender issues were no more palatable to most of us than before, but we’d entered the “new normal” of post-9/11 society by then and the paradigm had changed.

So, what happened after 9/11? The old days had a code of conduct, embodied in formal terms such as “due process.” Judge R.D. Fratkin wrote regarding the criminal case of once high-profile activist and MP Svend Robinson, “As I say, the public, at least in Canada, I think, has always lived by the sort of guiding principle [that] you don’t kick somebody when they’re down.” In our post-9/11 world of continual electronic downloading and instant media reaction, the new way of dealing with people and things we dislike, or don’t understand, is reactive paranoia.

“Unfortunately, Zionist groups, traditionally defensive and hyper-reactive, are thriving on a climate where everything and everyone is fair game to be judged via social media before informed and impartial “due process” can ever take place. The new mantra: Kick a person only when s/he is down, and just keep on kicking … truth is irrelevant.”

Unfortunately, Zionist groups, traditionally defensive and hyper-reactive, are thriving on a climate where everything and everyone is fair game to be judged via social media before informed and impartial “due process” can ever take place. The new mantra: Kick a person only when s/he is down, and just keep on kicking … truth is irrelevant.

Another historical example of uninformed public censure over-riding and even hijacking due process is the case of once high-profile activist MP Svend Robinson – perhaps the first victim of compromised due process in Canadian political history. He is the man that proposed that September 11 be designated as “Chile Day”, to mark the overthrow of Chilean president Salvador Allende’s democratically elected government on September 11, 1973.

Among a number of gaffes committed during his turbulent career, Robinson made the tactical error in 2002 of attempting to bypass Israeli security to visit Nobel Peace Prize winner Yasser Arafat. Zionist groups – including the one now trying to destroy the career of Dr. Anthony Hall – had a field day raising vitriolic protest against the NDP MP when the international controversy broke in the media.

How did then NDP federal leader Alexa McDonough react to what Zionists called the “travesty” of Robinson’s action? She stripped him of his prestigious Foreign Relations portfolio, and shortly thereafter resigned the party leadership. Alexa McDonough had been known in Halifax to be sympathetic to the Palestinian cause until that time. Two for two in favour of the Zionist fear-mongers … and no due process.

Which brings us full circle back to 2016 and the Zionist hijacking of due process at the University of Lethbridge.

I have always believed that a university president with an iota of self-respect would resist tooth and nail such a blatant assault on academic freedom and professional ethics as is occurring right now at his institution. Unfortunately, Canadian law cannot compel Dr. Mahon to disclose the real reasons behind his actions.  It is no small irony that Dr. Mahon cannot be brought to justice with the charge of misfeasance in public office, similar to the one brought against York University’s Lorna Marsden by Freeman-Maloy, because there is another due process, called Arbitration that was specially designed to protect tenured professors and was supposedly speedier than the lengthy court battle.

To make matters worse, notice the deafening silence of CAUT (Canadian Association of University Teachers) about the case of Dr. Anthony Hall. No wonder some university presidents went on record dismissing CAUT as “a bunch of losers.” Sadly, a group that could have raised a loud and legitimate collective voice in support of due process has lived up to its “loser” label and stayed in the shadows.

And one can only expect similar cowardice from the University of Lethbridge’s own Faculty Association. There will be initial cries of indignation, but soon enough they will decrease to furtive whispers. You see, they will have been “consulted,” making it then acceptable to watch one of their peers left by the roadside with no fair or impartial evaluation.

The experienced, well-orchestrated and politically influential Zionist group is making sure all the legal and ethical loopholes are closed and that the guillotine is firmly in place to chop off Dr. Hall’s career with no chance of appeal.

And that’s what is so manifestly wrong with this picture. As Einstein famously pointed out, “We can’t solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them.” Others have aptly added that the result of doing so is insanity.

Dr. M.R. Islam is a retired Dalhousie University professor and former Killam Chair of petroleum engineering. The opinions expressed in the foregoing editorial are his own.

A Teachable Moment By John Kaminski

JKHDRTEACHABLEXLFINAL

A Teachable Moment

The phrase ‘America First’ deemed offensive to Jews

Brainwashed Americans too stupid to realize what this really means

By John Kaminski

pseudoskylax@gmail.com

http://therebel.is/kaminski

AmericaFirst

Jewish protests about Donald Trump’s use of the phrase “America First” being anti-Semitic should tell you all you need to know about how Jews feel about America.

They feel they own it — and they largely do! — but they also feel the goyim should obey them when they pontificate that Israel comes first, and that Americans should put Israel’s interests before America’s.

And why wouldn’t they? Israel Firsters — both Jews and those bought off by Jews —  own the U.S. government and virtually the entire U.S. infrastructure in its entirety, and have for decades.

Top that off with the sad fact that just about all the information everyone receives through electronic and print media comes from Jewish owned shills, creating the perfect recipe for totalitarianism that is being swallowed hook, line and sinker by the younger generations of Americans who have had no exposure to the real history of the world, which reveals hundreds of years of warmaking Jewish perfidy exactly like what is happening in world today.

Screen Shot 2016-05-05 at 10.53.52 PM

The Jewish Anti-Defamation League, the CNN network and a fatuous Jewish columnist named Eli Lake have insisted the phrase “America First” evokes highly charged memories of a different era some 76 years ago when the world was perched on the precipice of World War II, and the famed American aviator Charles Lindbergh was the most visible figure trying desperately to keep the U.S. out of an unprecedented bloodbath.

ElitheLiar

The bloodthirsty Jews were frothing at the mouth in their frenzy to annihilate Adolf Hitler, who had removed the Jews from power in Germany and imprisoned many of them in work camps — which were not the death camps of Jewish media propaganda. The 6 million hoax has long ago been debunked as a cover story to conceal how Germany became prosperous when it put serious sanctions on the treasonous behavior of the exploitative Jews.

U.S. President Franklin Roosevelt, British Prime Minister Winston Churchill and Soviet Union dictator Josef Stalin — all of them descended from Jews and surrounded by Jewish advisers — had aimed for years to overthrow Hitler and liquidate the entire German population.

When Hitler removed the Jews from power in Germany in 1933, Jews all over the world declared war on him, and through their behind-the-scenes political control of the U.S., Britain, and the USSR, eventually obliterated the prosperous and innocent nation Hitler had resuscitated from the ashes of World War I.

Of course, because the world’s major media have been controlled by Jews throughout the 20th century, the world has been told a very different story about these events.

Now the ADL and their paid off lapdogs in America’s kosher-stink press have actually claimed it is wrong for Trump to use the phrase “America First” because it brings back memories of when one of the great Americans, Charles Lindbergh, fought courageously to keep the U.S. out of a falsely motivated World War II.

Lindberg2 Poster1000

Had Lindbergh succeeded, it would have saved tens of millions of lives. But the combination of the Jewish press and their willingness to publish the lies of the politicians who were paid handsomely by the Jews who controlled the world’s money supply was simply too strong for average citizens who simply wanted to live in peace to overcome.

After all — and to this very day — peace is never on the Jewish agenda.

Today CNN, a thoroughly Jewish propaganda organization that fires people when they mention that fact, actually acknowledges the truth of the facts of World War II, but brands them as lies. It is the way Jews typically flip reality on its head, as they do when they support the notion that shouting out “America First!” is anti-Semitic.

Screen Shot 2016-05-05 at 10.55.31 PM

In a tainted screed written by Williams College professor Susan Dunn

http://www.cnn.com/2016/04/27/opinions/trump-america-first-ugly-echoes-dunn/

CNN proceeds to paint with a broad brush of inferred anti-Semitism a whole phalanx of American politicians, from Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart and former president Gerald Ford, to former Kennedy insider Sargent Shriver and former Yale President Kingman Brewster, for joining Lindbergh’s “isolationist” crusade.

Robert Wood, the board chairman of Sears, Roebuck, agreed to act as their group’s temporary chair. The growing organization soon included powerful men like Col. Robert McCormick of the Chicago Tribune; Minnesota meatpacker Jay Hormel; Sterling Morton, the president of Morton Salt Company; U.S. Rep. Bruce Barton of New York; and Lessing Rosenwald, the former chairman of Sears.

These men were all patriots advocating U.S. independence who are now ridiculed by CNN as “soft on Hitler”. The true facts of the matter are that Hitler and Germany were the innocent victims of a worldwide Jewish conspiracy to throttle the most dangerous challenge ever seen to Jewish worldwide financial hegemony.

The way CNN tells it is that America First struggled with the problem of the anti-Semitism of some of its leaders and many of its members. CNN calls Henry Ford “notoriously anti-Semitic”, but Ford was and is the most important figure in the 20th century who correctly raised the alarm about international Jews who had allegiance to no country but their own demented tribe and its insane desire to conquer the world, which was a charge the Jews have always levelled against Hitler, but which was really a projection of their owned warped objective.

HenryQuotesTemplate-600 copy 2

As CNN enumerated the so called anti-Semitic aspects of Lindbergh’s America First movement, it cited a Kansas chapter leader who pronounced President Franklin Roosevelt and Eleanor Roosevelt “Jewish” and Winston Churchill a “half-Jew.”

CNN disparages these assertions as ridiculous, but the facts prove the charges were all true. Roosevelt was descended from Jews on both sides of his family, and Churchill’s abusive mother was an American Jew who raised one of the great homicidal maniacs and incompetent politicians of the 20th century.

(Yes, I happen to be reading Mike King’s latest history lesson, “The British Mad Dog: Debunking the Myth of Winston Churchill”.)

After Pearl Harbor, the America First Committee closed its doors, but not before Lindbergh made his famous speech at an America First rally in Des Moines, Iowa, in September 1941. After charging that President Roosevelt had manufactured “incidents” (like Pearl Harbor!) to propel the country into war, Lindbergh proceeded to blurt out his true thoughts.

“The British and the Jewish races,” he declared, “for reasons which are not American, wish to involve us in the war.” The nation’s enemy was an internal one, a Jewish one. “Their greatest danger to this country lies in their large ownership and influence in our motion pictures, our press, our radio, and our government,” he contended.

Henry&Charles

Today, these facts are even more true than they were in 1941.

Lindbergh’s unambiguous message was that Jews living in the United States constituted a wealthy, influential, conspiratorial foreign “race” that had seized “our” media and infiltrated “our” political institutions. They were the alien out-group, hostile to “us.”

Although Lindbergh’s assertions were all true, they were blotted out by the tremendous power of the Jewish controlled media and politicians bribed and blackmailed by the Jews, a demonic fact of life that continues to sabotage the USA right up to the present moment.

So confident of its power to mislead Americans with absurd lies, Holocaust-loving CNN quoted Anne Frank’s “stepsister” comparing Donald Trump to Adolf Hitler (we should be so lucky).

“Eva Schloss, now 86, was a friend of Frank’s in Amsterdam after their families fled Nazi Germany in the 1930s. Her mother, Fritzi, would marry Otto Frank, Anne’s father, after World War II. If Donald Trump become(s) the next president of the U.S. it would be a complete disaster,” she told Newsweek. “I think he is acting like another Hitler by inciting racism.”

Of course, anyone familiar with the Anne Frank scam knows what William Pierce discovered, that large parts of the so-called Diary of a Young Girl were written in ballpoint pen (despite an avalanche of Jewish arguments trying to defend their Holocaust myths that the diary was written with a fountain pen). http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/01/anne-frank-hoax-exposed/

The kicker is the ballpoint pen was invented in 1951; Anne Frank died in 1945.

AnneFBic

As it happens, I was going through my files recently and found some remarks by the now imprisoned Revisionist Horst Mahler which were translated into English by James Damon that reminded me how long this Jewish assault on reality has been going on.

Although many of the world’s great thinkers, from Cicero to Ezra Pound, have weighed in on the depraved behavior of the Jews, Mahler zeroed in on a long forgotten literary luminary who aptly described Jewish behavior more than 200 years ago.

In 1793 the German philosopher Johann Gottlieb Fichte described the Jewish problem quite clearly:

A power, animosity-filled state within a state is spreading through nearly all the countries of Europe . . . This state is constantly at war with all others, severely oppressing the general citizenry.

It is Judaism, the Judaic state.

The Jews must be granted human rights even though they deny them to others.

They are, after all, human beings; and the injustices that they commit do not give us the right to behave as they do.

In granting them the rights of citizens, however, I can see no alternative to cutting off their heads and replacing them with heads that are purged of Jewish ideas  . . .

In order to protect ourselves from them, I see no alternative but to transport them all to their promised land.

Mahler, perhaps the most eloquent of the World War II German revisionists who continues to be abused by the Jewified German authorites, had this to say about the quote.

For Fichte, the danger did not lie merely in the fact that Jews form a state within a state.

The greatest danger lay in the fact that the Jewish state is founded on hatred of all other states.

Mahler further commented on Fichte’s assessment by adding

I do not believe that this is true because it forms a separate a closely bound state, but rather because it is founded on hatred of the entire human race.”

We have known for many centuries that the Jews are a lethal menace to any country in which they choose to nest. No assessment of their criminal behavior has been more accurate than that of the famous 18th century French philosopher Voltaire.

”They are, all of them, born with raging fanaticism in their hearts, just as the Bretons and the Germans are born with blond hair. I would not be in the least bit surprised if these people would not some day become deadly to the human race…

Most Americans have no idea how perilously close we are to this observation coming true. Voltaire then predicted what we must to do prevent this.

”You have surpassed all nations in impertinent fables, in bad conduct and in barbarism. You deserve to be punished, for this is your destiny.”

http://www.judeofascism.com/2011/03/voltaire-on-jews.html

So the next time you see a Jew, greet him with Hitler’s hand salute and shout “America First”. Then tell him to go back to where he belongs (which might in fact be the bowels of hell).

Tell him to leave now, while he still has a chance to escape his fate, before everyone finally realizes the terrible things the Jews have done — and are doing — to the whole world. The world should know by now there is no reasoning with mad dogs.

Special treatment should be reserved for those politicians who take their money and propagate Jewish lies at the expense of America’s well being. And this includes virtually every politician in America.

John Kaminski is a writer who lives on the Gulf Coast of Florida, constantly trying to figure out why we are destroying ourselves, and pinpointing a corrupt belief system as the engine of our demise. Solely dependent on contributions from readers, please support his work by mail: 6871 Willow Creek Circle #103, North Port FL 34287 USA.

http://therebel.is/kaminski

http://johnkaminski.info/

http://www.rudemacedon.ca/kaminski/kam-index.html

http://www.serendipity.li/john_kaminski_articles.htm

http://web.archive.org/web/20040323232319/http://johnkaminski.com/

Can I really believe what I just heard? by John Kaminski

KaminskiTrumpHdr

Can I really believe what I just heard?

Can the Jew-controlled U.S. actually stop waging wars?

CAN A NATION OF KILLERS EVER REALLY TALK ABOUT PEACE?

By John Kaminski
pseudoskylax@gmail.com

I was astonished. For a moment the words seemed like an auditory mirage I was hearing in a dream. But there they were. I could play them back. In his speech at the Mayflower Hotel in Washington April 27, Donald Trump was saying he wanted to get along with Russia and China.

“Our goal is peace and prosperity,” Trump announced with finality, “not death and destruction.”

It was a thought I hadn’t heard expressed by any politician in . . . how long? Ever?

I immediately thought of Richard Nixon’s campaign promise of a secret plan to end the Vietnam war, a promise that he didn’t keep and a plan he did not have that nevertheless won him the 1968 presidential election.

I searched back in my memory for a candidate who talked of peace rather than bludgeoning a designated enemy.

Nixon mouthed friendly platitudes when he opened up communication with Communist China. And that was back in the early 1970s. Since then? Well, Bill Clinton illegally took campaign contributions from China back in the early ’90s. But that was when such contributions were against the law, and the law was still actually enforced, more or less.

Now Hillary Clinton goes directly to Israel to collect contributions, much in the way Mitt Romney did in the last election. It might still be against the law, but all Americans — everybody in the world, in fact — knows by now that politicians are never prosecuted for accepting illegal campaign contributions.

Heck, politicians are only in rare instances ever prosecuted for breaking the law at all, and those who actually are prosecuted are usually innocent, like Jim Traficant http://www.americanussr.com/american-ussr-james-traficant.htm and George Hansen http://www.uhuh.com/reports/hansen/hansen2.htm. Politicians have to have done something to offend the bankers’ cabal to even get noticed for committing a crime.

Breaking laws in a primitive quest for profit has never been a crime on the uppermost political level. Obama’s last crooked attorney general sold weapons directly to terrorists with nary a peep from the U.S. law enforcement community. That was the clincher that proved all the cops and judges and lawyers in America were utterly corrupt.

Among an endless number of examples prior to that and proving the point, virtually the entire U.S. government was guilty of treason for engineering the 9/11 coverup, which remains firmly in place.

As a particularly vivid recent example, the aforementioned Hillary, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Israeli Mossad, is facing a slew of charges from her improper handling of emails, when she was making billions for the Clinton Foundation using the power of the U.S. government to accumulate her fortune. Worse, of course, was her complicity in the slaughter of a U.S. ambassador, who himself was trying to sell weapons to terrorists in another war the criminal Obama administration was trying to foment.

Most Americans are still unwilling to admit to the unending crime spree and insane cruelty of the U.S. government that has affected everyone in the world, including its own citizens. Just about everyone has become inured to the warlike rhetoric that emanates from Washington. It is profound evidence of the sickness of American society and both the thoughtlessness and the powerlessness of its people.

So Trump, for all the bad press he has received from corrupt media outlets trying desperately to cover up the criminal activities of the bosses who pay their salaries, says he wants to change America’s attitude. He wants to “shake the rust off America’s foreign policy.”

This in itself is a superficial explanation. Without spelling out the analysis of America’s history that really needs to be exposed, he simply says, “The interests of America have to come first.”

The implication that remains unsaid is WHOSE interests have been served in their place for all these years and through all these wars. Neither Trump nor any other candidate has any intention of explaining those interests.

“In the 1940s we saved the world,” Trump says, adding, “We won the Cold War and we won big.”

But after that, he says, “Our foreign policy veered badly off course. We failed to develop a new vision. Logic was replaced with foolishness and arrogance”

Today, Trump concludes, “Our foreign policy is a complete and utter disaster —no vision, no purpose, no direction, no strategy.”

This is great theater already gaining positive reviews for his so-called command of U.S. foreign policy issues. For Trump to jump behind the scenes and reveal that the Jewish banking families in control of the Federal Reserve system have caused all of America’s woes over the last century is simply not going to happen.

Which is too bad, because that’s exactly what needs to happen.

Hence, the root cause of America’s planned disintegration and pauperization are neither going to be addressed nor corrected.

Be all that as it may, Trump is still far and away the best candidate this year — and perhaps the best candidate in many a year, for that sullied and disreputable office of the presidency of the United States.

Why? Foremost, he is the candidate most likely to keep us out of World War III, assuming Obama doesn’t start it before the election (as his legacy to the American people).

Secondly, he will put the criminal Hillary Clinton in jail where she belongs, we hope.

And what he says about our relations with Russia and China are very positive.

“We are not bound to be adversaries. The easing of tensions is possible.” And quit forthrightly he aims for “fixing our relations with China.”

In a tradition of presidents best known for starting wars from behind the scenes and approving the fleecing of the American people at the behest of Jewish bankers, he is a refreshing alternative to the robotic shills who talk only about Israel’s interests. I liked ex-speaker John Boehner’s remark that Trump’s main rival for the GOP nomination, Ted Cruz, was “Lucifer in the flesh”, which speaks volumes about who the power elite wants as its president.

On the other hand, Trump is still caught up in the urban legends created by the Jews and blamed on others, a syndrome most notably evident in the choreographed Muslim terror threat.

Trump may have made some promising statements about 9/11 and the Iraq war but has never addressed the false flag episodes in the United States — such as Sandy Hook — that were cynically created by the government in the campaign to get people to give up their guns.

I have not heard Trump say anything about the Second Amendment, and he is still connecting Osama bin Laden to 9/11. These are both evidence he will continue this neocon artificial reality that is destroying both our country and our world,

And he made a statement in that Washington speech that was much more prescient that even he realized when he said, “Unless you name the enemy, you will never ever solve the problem.”

In blaming Islamic terror as our No. 1 foreign policy problem, he has missed the mark. Our No. 1 foreign policy is the Jewish manipulation of reality, from which all our other problems stem, including so-called Islamic terror.

Some people say, “Well, he has to wait until after the election to really deal with that.” But I think back to Nixon’s peace plan to end the war which never really arrived until five years had passed and tens of thousands more people had died.

How many millions more must die before we finally have a leader who will clearly reveal the hidden hand behind this inhuman policy of robbery, murder and betrayal that jeopardizes the continuing survival our species?

Will it be Donald Trump? Doubtful.

FURTHER POINTS TO PONDER:

• The Muslim terror threat is not the greatest danger to all life on the planet. The greatest danger to all life on the planet is the U.S. military following the orders of insane Jews who seek to kill or enslave all the nonJews of the world.

• The ISIS group, which the U.S. pretends to battle, is really the creation of the U.S. and Israel, making Obama’s pronouncements the epitome of American hypocrisy. Like ISIS, al-Qaeda was and is the creation of American policy, making everything you’ve read in a newspaper or heard on TV about this group to be a total misrepresentation. And all those millions of lives, as Cindy Sheehan has been pointing out for years, have been thrown away for nothing but a lie.

• With the American military perched in key positions on the edge of Russia, bombing Syria, still strafing Afghanistan, having already obliterated Libya, assisting in the Saudi invasion of Yemen, and trying to stir up trouble in the South China Sea, what do you think Donald Trump means when he enthusiastically exclaims that he wants to create a much stronger American military?

God help us all. And He won’t — unless we help ourselves and rid the world of this criminal government that permits only Jew-approved despots to run for president.

—-

John Kaminski is a writer who lives on the Gulf Coast of Florida, constantly trying to figure out why we are destroying ourselves, and pinpointing a corrupt belief system as the engine of our demise. Solely dependent on contributions from readers, please support his work by mail: 6871 Willow Creek Circle #103, North Port FL 34287 USA.
http://therebel.is/kaminski
http://johnkaminski.info/
http://www.rudemacedon.ca/kaminski/kam-index.html
http://www.serendipity.li/john_kaminski_articles.htm
http://web.archive.org/web/20040323232319/http://johnkaminski.com/

Bogus candidates for deluded people by John Kaminsky

KaminskiTrainWreckHdr

Bogus candidates for deluded people

The truly important issues are never even addressed!

IF WE DON’T DO IT NOW, WE WILL NEVER BE ALLOWED TO TALK ABOUT JEWISH CRIMES

By John Kaminski
pseudoskylax@gmail.com
http://therebel.is/kaminski

Most of you know, but you pretend you don’t. The government is not on your side. It never has been. And the way things are set up, it never will be.

Especially when nearly everyone is too cowardly to talk about the most important issue, that is, to name the Jew as the cause of this slow motion train wreck now destroying the United States of America.

The government’s animosity toward the population has degenerated to the point where it can set up an ambush on a snowy Oregon highway with the intent to murder an unarmed patriot who was only trying to defend Constitutional principles and protest the theft of a farmer’s land by a corrupt government agency, and then have the killing ruled justifiable by a reckless judge wired into the criminal cabal in Washington trying to conceal a Presidential candidate’s diabolical maneuver to illegally sell U.S. uranium deposits to the Russians.

Of course, this kind of perfidy is nothing new. It has always been the basic modus operandi of American history.

Ordinary people have been judged guilty before they could be charged since before the first Kennedy assassination; some say the people were declared permanently guilty in the federal bankruptcy of 1933 when the government used them as collateral to sell America to the International Monetary Fund.

Others insist it happened long before that, when Lincoln cashed in the Constitution in order to enforce the ripoff of the Confederacy; and still others insist the people have never been in control of their U.S. government, not even on that day Patrick Henry refused to go to Philadelphia because he felt the Constitution was a fraud.

In any case, we surely are not in control of our government today — of this there is no doubt. All that money we send to slick talking candidates who promise to defend our interests is now and always has been for nothing. Only the rich who can bribe with millions control the politicians, making all the irrelevant rhetoric of our deeply flawed presidential candidates all the more preposterous as it assails our ears from the pursed lips of our prostituted media pundits.

The so-called hero of the current presidential campaign has galvanized people desperate for a relevant hero into believing construction of a giant wall on the Mexican border somehow is the answer to all things that besiege us in this watershed election year of 2016.

However, it has been my observation in every presidential election year that all the major candidates are prescreened by the bankers and guaranteed not to reveal the major secrets that enslave society. This is compounded by an equally obvious fact that the major obstacle to peace and tranquility are the candidates themselves who are chosen by and beholden to the bankers, and their corrupt efforts come at the expense of the American people.

Let me be clear about this — the major threat to the American people are the candidates themselves and the corrupt government they presume to represent. Which of course makes our corrupt elections certain exercises in futility. This has gone on so long the American people have come to believe this situation — pre-elected Jewish favored candidates compounded by computerized fixed elections — is normal and healthy.

Worst of all in all the presidential elections is that the real issues are never — and I mean absolutely never — discussed.

Billionaire casino mogul Donald Trump has captivated the masses by seizing on the unease expressed by longtime Americans who see runaway immigration gobbling up jobs, destabilizing communities and overstressing law enforcement and medical systems.

Perhaps most shocking is that all his opponents and all of the major mainstream media accuse Trump of betraying their corrupt American system — the one that exports wars around the world and funnels its jobs to Third World countries to maximize the profits of the rich and pauperize the lives of its honest taxpayers — to the point where assassination is recommended for the one candidate who seems somewhat interested in the welfare of ordinary people.

Simply on the basis the opposition emanating by proven criminals Trump seems an easy choice for any conscientious voter with a passing knowledge of America’s criminal history in the 20th century.

But despite his pinpointing of the epidemic immigration of destitute Third World criminals as an issue critical to America’s survival, even Trump won’t go near the truly profound issues facing the American people, which are:

1. A proper investigation and prosecution of the perpetrators of the 9/11 debacle, which were not Arab hijackers but Jewish American billionaires, who control the White House, the Congress, the banking establishment and all the other major professions in the country.

This probe would also result in the dismantling of the Department of Homeland Security, which under the aegis of criminal Attorneys General and corrupt judges, has allowed widespread criminality by the government itself under Presidents Clinton, Bush and Obama, and jailed millions of innocent people who have committed no substantive crimes.

2. This false flag deceit has led to the expense of trillions of dollars fighting irrelevant wars against innocent countries for the purpose of stealing their resources and killing those who oppose Jewish worldwide financial hegemony, resulting in the pauperization of the American people and funneling of trillions to Israel and their outlaw minions throughout the world.

It was bad enough when the government invented Al-Qaeda as an all-purpose enemy that could be blamed for 9/11 yet used an ally against Serbia and Libya, but the funding of ISIS by the U.S. and then sending U.S. troops to fight them represents an all-time low in the integrity of the American government as well as an all-time low in the gullibility of the American people.

When a government funds its own enemies, no one is safe.

3. One area presidential candidates have absolutely refused to discuss has been the approval of poisoned food manufactured by producers of poison chemicals and the failure to identify poison medicines which have already ravaged younger generations with autism and other maladies, giving rise to certain identification of an evil policy of white genocide and population reduction in order to further consolidate vicious, conscienceless Jewish control of the world.

Certainly no candidate has dared discuss this epidemic of murders of conscientious doctors who have discovered the presence of cancer-causing agents in government approved vaccines, or the vaccines given to girls that prevent their ability to have normal children when they grow up. http://www.healthnutnews.com/abc-holistic-doctor-wife-child-killed-in-horrific-triple-murder/

4. The government has put a total clampdown on information pertaining to the pollution of the atmosphere. While officials prattle on about carbon taxes, no candidate dares to address the longterm effect of the Fukushima disaster or the overstressed situation of U.S. nuclear plants, 75 percent of which have been found to be leaking http://www.cbsnews.com/news/radioactive-leaks-found-at-75-of-us-nuke-sites/.

Leaking nuke plants contribute to rising cancer rates, which is great for the cancer industry and Big Pharma criminals <http://yournewswire.com/cancer-rates-explode-near-new-york-nuclear-plant-leak/>.

5. Jewish control of the world is already markedly identifiable by the cynical changes in college curricula that emphasize the practice of social perversions over the mastery of classical sciences. Taken down to the earlier levels of education, the institution of dumbed down courses, easier grading, and massive levels of student loan debt guarantees a future populations of unequipped, financially strapped morons unable to fend for themselves except by depending on their government welfare checks under the condition of not objecting to totalitarian, regressive and destructive government programs.

6. While candidates continue to rage on about the moral failings of their opponents, none are seriously discussing the condition of America’s money supply, which is the No. 1 issue on the minds of the American people.

Only Ellen Brown, that we know of, and her plan to finance a series of public state banks, seems willing to advance a sensible proposal, but since the corrupt powers that be are dependent on the widespread graft that keeps them in business, no presidential candidate is likely to ever discuss this issue, as long as the wholly Jewish owned, foreign controlled, Federal Reserve system remains in control of America’s money supply, charging us daily for the use of our own money and forcing America deeper and deeper down the sewer of Jewish perfidy. http://www.publicbankinginstitute.org

In the meantime, media reports remind us that when it comes time to attempt to balance the books on America’s Jewish-fouled finances, debts relating to derivatives must by law be paid off first, leaving nothing for the people and businesses who are about to have their bank accounts stolen by the Jews who control America and the world.

Current candidates for president don’t talk about any of these realistically pressing issues, and the retarded mainstream media nor most retarded mainstream Americans don’t press them on it.

You can’t expect pathological criminals to give themselves up, can you?

So it really doesn’t matter who you vote for. All these candidates are devoted to supporting the criminal Jewish status quo, to continue the wars for Israel and the pillaging of the emaciated carcass of the moribund American republic.

Until this practice is stopped cold — and widely discussed by America’s erstwhile politicians — neither you nor America has a legitimate future in which freedom and liberty may be practiced, and the world’s problems may be freely and legitimately discussed.

On this basis every elected government official now serving should be assailed and attacked unmercifully for their complicity in treason and the willful destruction of both the United States of America and the world as we know it.

No exceptions. The time for petitions and/or civil discourse is long past. The fate of the world hangs in the balance, the criminal perpetrators of all these crimes against humanity are well known, and any delay in exacting justice against these pathological villains can only be judged an unforgivable sin.

—-

John Kaminski is a writer who lives on the Gulf Coast of Florida, constantly trying to figure out why we are destroying ourselves, and pinpointing a corrupt belief system as the engine of our demise. Solely dependent on contributions from readers, please support his work by mail: 6871 Willow Creek Circle #103, North Port FL 34287 USA.
http://therebel.is/kaminski
http://johnkaminski.info/
http://www.rudemacedon.ca/kaminski/kam-index.html
http://www.serendipity.li/john_kaminski_articles.htm
http://web.archive.org/web/20040323232319/http://johnkaminski.com/

Anti-BDS Motion – Why Does Canada Sanction Other Countries for Human Rights Violations but Not Israel? By Julie Lévesque Global Research

BDSCANADAVOTE

http://www.globalresearch.ca/anti-bds-motion-why-does-canada-sanction-other-countries-for-human-rights-violations-but-not-israel/5510386

Anti-BDS Motion – Why Does Canada Sanction Other Countries for Human Rights Violations but Not Israel?

By Julie Lévesque

Global Research, February 26, 2016

BDS-Logo-Israel-Boycott-400x242

 

The international community, speaking through the United Nations, has identified three regimes as inimical to human rights – colonialism, apartheid and foreign occupation… Israel’s occupation of the West Bank, Gaza and East Jerusalem contains elements of all three of these regimes”. – John Dugard, UN’s former Special Rapporteur for Human Rights in the Occupied Palestinian Territories.

This week, the Canadian Parliament overwhelmingly voted in favour of a motion condemning the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement against Israel.

The motion, passed on February 22 by a 229-51 vote, states:

“That, given Canada and Israel share a long history of friendship as well as economic and diplomatic relations, the House reject the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement, which promotes the demonization and delegitimization of the State of Israel, and call upon the government to condemn any and all attempts by Canadian organizations, groups or individuals to promote the BDS movement, both here at home and abroad.”

First, there is no such thing as “friendship” between states. States have no friends, they have interests and nothing else.

Second, the BDS movement does not promote “the demonization and delegitimization of the State of Israel,” as the motion puts it, in a very unfactual and questionable manner. The BDS movement promotes international law and Palestinian rights and condemns Israel’s total lack of respect for both.

Despite its emotional and propagandist wording, the motion completely fails to hide the fact that it condemns criticism of human rights violations by Israel. This calls for some explanations.

By condemning a peaceful movement that tries to bring Israel to account, Canada expresses its total disregard for human rights and international law and its sheer hypocrisy when faced with human rights violations.

There are currently 22 states targeted by Canadian sanctions, several of them for human rights violations. And Israel, being Canada’s “friend”, is not one of them, even if the sanctioned countries’ misdeeds pale in comparison to the death and destruction Israel has imposed on Palestinians for decades.

While not one sanction has been imposed on Israel for its war crimes and crimes against humanity, some countries have been sanctioned by Canada simply for “misappropriating state funds.”

There are no words to describe the scale of this hypocrisy, but, we don’t need any since the facts speak for themselves. Before looking at the list of sanctioned countries and the reasons behind their sanctions, it is worth mentioning only a few facts about Israel.

As mentioned in the quote above, Israel’s policies and practices violate the most fundamental human rights of the Palestinians. The Hebrew state has been the subject of at least 77 UN resolutions since 1955, and has been criticized in at least 26 resolutions for its violations of U.N. Security Council resolutions.

In July 2015, a report by Amnesty International found “compelling evidence of serious violations of international humanitarian law by Israeli forces” as well as “strong evidence of war crimes and possible crimes against humanity” during Israel’s 2014 assault on Gaza.” Evidence of war crimes and crimes against humanity were also found during Operation Cast Lead in 2008.

Of course, most reports from the U.N. as well as the ones from human rights organizations mentioned below pretend to be “balanced” by equally blaming both sides, the Israeli army as well as Palestinian militias. If opinions can be “balanced”, facts, however, cannot, and the scale of death and destruction doesn’t lie. Most, if not all the damage and loss of life occurs on the Palestinian side. Every single time.

These few facts about Operations Cast Lead in 2008 and Protective Edge in 2014 prove it:

Cast Lead:

[B]etween 1,385 and 1,419 Palestinians were killed during Cast Lead, a majority of them civilians, including at least 308 minors under the age of 18. More than 5000 more were wounded. Thirteen Israelis were also killed, including 3 civilians.

According to the UN, 3,540 housing units were completely destroyed, with another 2,870 sustaining severe damage.

More than 20,000 people – many of them already refugees, some two or three times over – were made homeless.

Protective Edge:

At least 2,100 Palestinians were killed, of whom the United Nations identified more than 1,500 as civilians, and approximately 11,000 people, mostly civilians, were injured. The tens of thousands of Israeli attacks caused the vast majority of destruction during the fighting, which left uninhabitable 22,000 homes, displacing 108,000 people, and left hundreds of thousands without adequate water or electricity.

Attacks by Palestinian civilians injured 61 Israeli settlers in the West Bank as of October 31, the UN reported. In addition to the three Israeli teenagers who were killed in June, nine Israeli civilians were killed by Palestinians.

How many dead Israeli civilians compared to Palestinian civilians? How many housing units destroyed in Israel? How many homeless Israelis? Let’s be honest. A truly balanced report would reflect the facts and not try to equally blame both sides. The forces in this conflict as well as the damage done are anything but equal. They are completely disproportionate.

That being said, Israel’s contempt for international law is legend and with this motion, Canadian Parliamentarians have just proven one more time they are bought and sold.

It is now worth taking a look at the countries against which Canada has placed sanctions and why, since all of them, without exception, pale in comparison to Israel’s bloody record.

The list clearly shows how Canada has no credibility whatsoever when it comes to condemning states for their lack of respect for human rights or people who protest against criminal states, for that matter.

Here is the list of the countries sanctioned for human rights reasons. It should be noted that several, if not all, background explanations provided on the Canadian Government web site (in brackets) are totally biased and simplistic, when not pure propaganda.

Belarus: “[D]eteriorating human rights situation.”

This includes “widespread harassment and detention of opposition party campaign workers, the physical assault of senior opposition figures, arbitrary use of state powers to support the incumbent president, pressure on state workers and students to support the President, restrictions on the ability of opposition campaigns to communicate with the electorate, and control of the state media to severely restrict access by opposition candidates.”

What happens it the Occupied Territories is much worse, yet no sanctions against Israel.

Burma: “[G]ravity of the human rights and humanitarian situation…, which threatened peace and security in the entire region.”

Libya: “[V]iolence and the use of force against civilians.”

Day-to-day in the Occupied Territories.

Russia: “Activists were beaten, kidnapped and tortured [in Ukraine]. The Russian government encouraged, and supported, these measures.”

Meanwhile, more and more “Palestinian children [are] beaten and tortured by Israeli security forces while in detention.” Read also Israeli NGO B’Tselem’s report Backed by the System: Abuse and Torture at the Shikma Interrogation Facility.

Sudan: “[H]umanitarian crisis and widespread human rights violations resulting from the conflict in Darfur region”

Syria: “The Syrian Government’s violent crackdown on peaceful protesters led to many civilian deaths and injuries. Thousands of civilians were detained arbitrarily and there were credible reports of summary executions and torture.”

Israel arbitrarily detains Palestinians on a regular basis, including children, and summary executions and torture and common.

According to B’Tselem: “At the end of Dec. 2015, 422 Palestinian minors were held in Israeli prisons as security detainees and prisoners, including 6 administrative detainees.”

According to Human Rights Watch:

“Israeli security forces continued to arrest children suspected of criminal offenses, usually stone-throwing, in their homes at night, at gunpoint; question them without a family member or lawyer present; and coerce them to sign confessions in Hebrew, which they do not understand… As of October 31, Israel held 457 Palestinian administrative detainees without charge or trial, based on secret evidence. Israeli prison authorities shackled hospitalized Palestinians to their hospital beds after they went on long-term hunger strikes to protest their administrative detention.”

Last year, Amnesty International has condemned “what it called a ‘clear pattern’ of… summary killings… as the number of Palestinians killed by Israeli forces this month [October 2015] rose to at least 61. )

Ukraine: “Activists were beaten, kidnapped and tortured.”

Zimbabwe: “marked escalation in human rights violations and violence directed at the political opposition, a stolen election, the denial of a peaceful democratic transition and a worsening humanitarian situation.”

Other reasons for which Canada has sanctioned countries include:

– “political crisis and conflict” (Yemen, Somalia);

– “violations of ceasefire and hostilities” (Ivory Coast, Democratic Republic of the Congo);

– “misappropriated state funds” (Egypt, Tunisia);

– “heavy loss of human life and widespread material damage resulting from a conflict” (Eritrea, Somalia);

– “nuclear program” (Sanctions on Iran, which has a nonexistent nuclear program, but none on Israel, which is known to possess between 200 and 400 nuclear warheads.)

– “invasion” (Sanctions on Iraq for the invasion of Kuwait… but no sanctions for the U.S. which has illegally invaded Iraq, among other countries, and of course, no sanctions on Israel for decades of occupation);

– “continued escalation of hostilities” (Lebanon)

– “support for the Revolutionary United Front in Sierra Leone” (Liberia)

– “violation of the constitution and international law” (Ukraine).

– “conducting a test of a nuclear weapon” (North Korea)

– “acts of violence and the increase in acts of piracy and armed robbery at sea against vessels” (Somalia)

– “engaging in violent conflict, much of it along ethnic lines” (South Sudan)

As you probably noticed, none of these countries has been accused of war crimes or crimes against humanity.

Canada imposes sanctions on countries for misappropriated state funds, but regards war criminal state Israel as a “friend” which deserves that it condemns its own citizens for protesting against its supreme crime.

Parliamentarians need to explain this nonsense.

As a member of the United Nations, Canada should, as stated in the U.N. Preamble, “reaffirm faith in fundamental human rights, in the dignity and worth of the human person, in the equal rights of men and women and of nations large and small, and… establish conditions under which justice and respect for the obligations arising from treaties and other sources of international law can be maintained.”

By voting in favour of this motion, Canadian Parliamentarians have failed to honor their obligations.Miserably.

—–

The original source of this article is Global Research

Copyright © Julie Lévesque, Global Research, 2016

TO FIND OUT HOW YOUR MEMBER OF PARLIAMENT VOTED PLEASE GO TO THIS LINK

Jew Tube Censors Brian Ruhe Videos as being “hate speech” A Report from Paul Fromm, Director, Canadian Association for Free Expression

JewTubeCensorsRuheHdr copy

JewTubeNoticeRuhe

Jew Tube Censors Brian Ruhe Videos as being “hate speech”

A Report from Paul Fromm, Director, Canadian Association for Free Expression

CAFELOGOFINAL

Questioning the Hollywood Versions of WW II is ‘Hate Speech’

Prolific Vancouver videographer Brian Ruhe who has done dozens of commentaries questioning the Hollywood version of World War II has  lost a number of teaching positions because of organized Zionist pressure. Now his most recent offering has been scrubbed from You Tube and he’s received a preachy scolding.

His video is ‘inappropriate’ — that vacuous, politically correct term meaning ‘we don’t like it.’

Apparently, his latest video violates ‘community guidelines.” Whose community, one might ask?

“We encourage free speech and defend everyone’s right to express their points of view, even if unpopular. However, YouTube doesn’t allow hate speech.’

Of course, You Tube supports free speech, just not for revisionists. It’s for free speech but not ‘hate speech” and, of course, they’ll decide. Free speech supporters know that ‘hate speech’ is not speech that preaches hate and destruction but speech that some powerful group HATES!

 

Paul Fromm,
Director
CANADIAN ASSOCIATION FOR FREE EXPRESSION (CAFE)

Canadian Roundtable – The Trial of Arthur Topham & The Jewish Lobby in Canada by Red Ice Radio

http://www.redicecreations.com/radio/2016/02/RIR-160210.php

CanRound Final

 

Zionist Jew Lobby B’nai Brith Canada Attacks Buddhist Truth Revealer Brian Ruhe by Arthur Topham

BuddhaAttackHdr copy 2

 

BodhisattvaVow

Zionist Jew Lobby B’nai Brith Canada Attacks Buddhist Truth Revealer Brian Ruhe

by

Arthur Topham

They say that the Devil never rests and in the case of Canada’s rabid Zionist Jew lobby organization B’nai Brith Canada truer words were never spoken.

Not wishing to await the outcome of the upcoming trial of R v Roy Arthur Topham set to commence on October 26th, 2015 –  the result of which will play heavily into whether or not the pro-Israeli, Zionist lobbyist will have been successful in using their Sec. 319(2) “Hate Propaganda” legislation, which they successfully embedded into Canadian jurisprudence in order to censor and suppress any and all legitimate criticism of their nefarious political ideology and their detestable terrorist, racist supremacist actions in Palestine and around the world – the Zionists are continually combing the Internet here in Canada trolling with vehement and fanatical Simon Wiesenthal “Nazi-hunting” fervour for more truth seekers who are courageously revealing the plethora of lies that the Zionist controlled msm has been mind-controlling the masses with for the past century.

There are more victims of Zionist misfeasance in former democratic Canada than the recent case of Buddhist author and teacher Brian Ruhe of Vancouver, B.C., the foremost being that of Vancouver’s Chinese artist and writer Joe Canuck whose two websites www.joecanuck.net and www.joecanuck.wix.com/justiceforchinese were both surreptitiously and summarily silenced and removed from the net by the server www.wix.com without explanation to the owner, but for now I will focus on Ruhe as his woes are well documented.

What is rather unique about this latest provocation by the Zionist Jew control freaks from B’nai Brith Canada is that they usually spend their time and taxpayer’s money attacking Christians who they feel they can accuse of spreading “hate” toward their self-chosen tribe of spiritual delinquents in order to have their victim’s tossed in the slammer for a couple of years and their websites either taken down and/or, as in the recent case of Canada’s coffee and donut franchise Tim Hortons, if nothing else, at least have their sites blocked from access by the general public.

These Talmudic Marxist Bolshevik Communist inspired censors from B’nai Brith Canada are relentless and deeply disturbed individuals – their insecurity and paranoia being paramount and the transparency of their actions blatantly obvious in every act they perform. Rather than openly debating those who criticize aspects of their own ideological foundations and proving them wrong they prefer to use their “power of the purse” and their undue political, legal and media influence to simply vilify and slander their intellectual opponents and in the process do anything they can to discriminate against and harass them and destroy their financial means of survival.

In the case of Vancouver based Buddhist teacher Brian Ruhe, rather than attempt to have him charged with a Sec. 319(2) “Hate Propaganda” Criminal Code of Canada offence, they’ve decided to do everything in their power to both discredit his good name amongst his employers and destroy his livelihood at all costs. This is the first instance that I’ve heard of where they are working their vile black sorcery behind the scenes in order to destroy the reputation and good will of a recognized and practising Buddhist. Once again living proof that their Talmudic mindset has absolutely no regard for any other religions or beliefs besides its own supremacist, racist ideology.

Readers who have been following my own case in the courts over the past 9 years of litigation brought on by this same notorious group of self-deluded sycophants for the state of Israel will know that recently I was interviewed on video by Brian Ruhe while in Vancouver early this year while looking after my dying brother. The purpose of the interview was to assist me in raising awareness about Canada’s disgusting, unjust “Hate Crime” legislation (Sec. 318 to 320 CCC) which the Zionist Jew lobby was directly responsible for creating for their own self-serving purposes as well as helping me to raise funds for my upcoming trial this October.

Meeting Brian for the first time in the flesh it was easily discernible to me that here was another individual who had finally, through his own researching and seeking, come to the full realization that all we had been told and taught about world history over the past century was twisted and warped beyond comprehension by the Zionist Jew media acting in and through all of its shape-shifting aspects, be they academia, Hollywood movies, books, magazines, radio stations, tv news and the Zionist newspaper monopoly.

Brian Ruhe is the author of two well-known and loved books on Buddhism. His first work, Freeing the Buddha, pictured below was published in March of 1998.

FreeingtheBuddha copy

FreeingtheBuddha 1 copy

Brian’s second work, A Short Walk On An Ancient Path, came out in 2010 accompanied, as in his first work, with many positive reviews.

ShortWalkonÅncientPath copy

ShortWalkonÅncientPath 1 copy 6ShortWalkonÅncientPath 1 copy 4

ShortWalkonÅncientPath 1 copy 5

Upon reading the book reviews and accolades it was quite apparent that Brian Ruhe was/is a well loved and respected Buddhist meditation instructor. He had moved to Vancouver back in 1980 from Ontario where he’d studied business and philosophy at Brock University. Following a few years stint as a financial planner Brian’s inner quest for greater spiritual understanding finally moved him to begin his search for a deeper understanding of life. Like many of his generation he was drawn to Buddhism because of its focus upon the mind and the age-old practise of seeking within one’s own being for the truths that the soul eternally strives to attain.

Brian’s path led him to a Tibetan Buddhist centre in Vermont, USA that had been founded by the world reknowned Buddhist teacher Chögyam Trungpa. From there he traveled to Thailand where he continued his spiritual efforts for the next four years and was trained to be a meditation instructor. Brian eventually returned to Canada in order to begin sharing his teachings with others.

It wasn’t coincidental nor did it require any amount of foresight to realize that while in conversation with Brian at his Kitsilano apartment in Vancouver during the course of our interview we openly discussed the prospect that it was merely a matter of time before he would, in all likelihood, like myself, soon show up on B’nai Brith Canada’s radar screen and the attack upon his name and work would commence. In fact, it wasn’t long after doing the video with Brian I learned from him that he was being attacked front, left and center by the Zionist forces embedded throughout our pro-Israel, Jewish-influenced cultural institutions.

Of course, as per usual, it began with a Zionist Jew “Lama” (try wrapping your mind around that one!) by the name of “Tsewang” who phoned Brian at his home and threatened to call B’nai Brith Canada (BBC) and report him. Once he did that B’nai Brith’s Victoria based sayan operative* wrote to the Vancouver Parks Board and had Brian fired from teaching at (four) community centres.

On Sept. 14th Mr. Ruhe did get fired from the Roundhouse Community and Arts Centre. When this despicable act occurred Brian Ruhe phoned the sayan agent in Victoria, B.C. and spoke to him.  The BBC operative told Brian “I don’t think you’re qualified to teach.” He then threatened to contact the Vancouver Police force and register a complaint of harassment against Mr. Ruhe for actually having the chutzpah to call him on the telephone to discuss his rash and hateful behaviour!

Following word of his dismissal Brian also wrote a letter to Craig Giles – President of the Roundhouse Community and Arts Centre stating in part,

“As the president of the association you are in a leadership position in our community and it doesn’t make sense that someone in Victoria should tell you how to do your job. Were you under pressure from any quarters to fire me? Did City Manager Penny Ballem have anything to do with this?

I have taught meditation for 16 years at the Roundhouse since 1999 with over 1000 people taking my classes there in groups from 5 to 25. This has helped a lot of people and I have a good reputation with these students. I’ve always enjoyed working with the staff and have had a very good relationship with them all these years. I have booked Tuesday nights here and now it’s too late to work somewhere else for the fall term.

This is a larger issue of freedom of speech in Canada. I was fired for using my freedom of speech in my YouTube videos where I discuss truth search themes about geopolitical power in the world and 20th century history. I didn’t discuss these views in my meditation classes, I was not accused of doing so and there were no complaints from the students in my classes. I feel that I am showing a high moral standard by speaking out for the benefit of humanity. Our country was founded on the fundamental principle of freedom of speech and our forefathers fought for the freedoms that you and I have today. You are in a leadership position so I ask you to consider this and write back to me with your thoughts on this please.

Thank you kindly,

Brian Ruhe

brianruhe.ca

So that in a nutshell is what is now happening here in Canada when anyone decides to question the Zionist Jewish narrative whether it be their “Holocaust Hoax” of the 20th Century, their actions in Gaza against the indigenous true Semitic people of Palestine, their media control over Canada and the West,  or any number of other facets of the Zionist paradigm that the Jews subject their host societies to in order to maintain their power base throughout the Western world.

Brian Ruhe’s experience is not new. Je Suis Brian Ruhe! There have been dozens of other Canadians before him (including yours truly) who have suffered the slings and arrows of outrageous falsehood by the political machinations of this tribe of psychopathic deviants willing to go to any length to prevent the world from knowing the truth about their dark and sinister agenda for total global control of the world’s resources, both natural and human.

In a very real sense this is the essence of all that I have fought against over the past nine years of ongoing litigation brought on by this power-crazed Rothschild Freemasonic organization known as B’nai Brith Canada. It began on Valentine’s Day February 14th, 2007 when this same deluded maniacal sayan first sent me an unsolicited email using a phoney alias “Brian Esker” accusing me of being an “anti-Semite” and demanding that I stop publishing articles on the Zionist Jews and remove the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion from my website.

Come October 26th, 2015 here in Quesnel’s Supreme Court we will see whether or not these past nine years of harassment, intimidation, arrest, incarceration and theft of my personal computers, files and firearms will end with a victory for freedom of speech in Canada and a loss for the likes of this traitorous foreign lobby group B’nai Brith Canada and their sleazy serpentine zombie trolls. If it doesn’t then we will all be held hostage to these alien enemy interlopers who’ve been destroying our nation and culture for the past century and the country will be torn further and further apart as they once again destroy another gentile nation in their heinous game of power and control over humanity.

Justice must and Will prevail.

——-

* [Editors Note: I am restricted by a court order from publishing the name of this B’nai Brith agent.]

••••  ••••

Please help out with my upcoming Sec. 319(2) “Hate Propaganda” trial in October by making a donation.

Donations can be made online via my GoGetFunding site located at http://gogetfunding.com/canadian-publisher-faces-jail-for-political-writings/ or else by sending cash, cheques or Money Orders to the following postal address. Please make sure that any cheques or Money Orders are made out to – Arthur Topham – and sent to:

Arthur Topham
4633 Barkerville Highway
Quesnel, B.C.
V2J 6T8

Open Letter to B.C. Premier Christie Clark from Radical Press Publisher Arthur Topham

ClarkLetterHeader

RPEditor400

Premier Christie Clark
West Annex
Parliament Buildings
Victoria, BC
V8V 1X4
 
July 31, 2014

 
Ms. Clark,
 
I cannot adequately convey my deep sense of disappointment and outrage over the fact that you have appeared before B.C.’s Zionist Jew community in Vancouver and despoiled and sullied the good name of the province of British Columbia and all of its inhabitants by speaking to and telling the crowd of complicit Zionist war criminals within its midst that British Columbians support the bloody, genocidal actions of the state of Israel against the defenceless people of Gaza, Palestine. 
 
By your own actions you are telling the world, not just B.C., that all the citizens of this great province support the ongoing slaughter of children and women and men in Gaza, and in doing so you not only are betraying the trust of British Columbians but committing an act of treason against your country.
 
The state of Israel is the most belligerent, blood-thirsty, zealously racist, rogue, apartheid nation on the face of the planet; one that’s been illegally and irrationally stealing territory from the rightful owners of the land since its inception in 1948, using murder and genocide and terror of the defenceless Palestinian people as its primary aim, all with the intention of driving the Palestinians out of their own territory so that Israel can gain control of the land and all its resources.
 
Israel has herded the Palestinians into concentration camps like Gaza and then imposed outrageously unjust restrictions upon their freedoms so as to make them dependent upon the  Israeli state for all basic necessities like water, food, medical supplies and education. 
 
As this unjustifiable carnage and slaughter continues and the world’s media, controlled by the Zionist Jews, continues to pump out its lies and anti-Palestinian propaganda on a 24/7 basis, people around the world are rising up to protest the crimes of Israel against their helpless victims, finally realizing from all the blatant, astounding destruction and death, that this Jews-only, supremacist state is not only a threat to peace in the Middle East but the number one stumbling block to peace around the world.
 
As a citizen of the province of B.C. from before the time that you were born I strongly object to the fact that you’ve assumed the right to speak on my behalf and attempted to tell the Jewish Zionist community of Vancouver that all of British Columbia is in full support of Israel’s illegal, immoral, illogical and ill-conceived actions toward the people of Gaza. Nothing could be further from the truth. Your complicity in this matter is beyond the pale of anything resembling a humanitarian, statesman-like approach to a conflict that’s been the bane of civilized people for the past sixty-six years of Israel’s existence as an independent member of the world’s nations.
 
Your callous and crude display of feigned allegiance to the racist, murderous actions of Israel, all based upon the lie that “Israel has the right to defend itself” by slaughtering innocent men, women and children, will go down in history as yet one more example of how the mighty have fallen for the lies of World Jewry’s insidious, ongoing propaganda. 
 
I cannot tell you just how ashamed I am of you and your government for having taken this political stance in your unabashed support for war crimes committed by the state of Israel. As head of B.C.’s elected government you’ve added your name and the name of the B.C. Liberal Party to a growing list of undisguised, shameless traitors and sycophants who, like Prime Minister Stephen Harper, have dragged Canada’s former reputation as a peace-loving nation down into the gore and blood and rubble and terror that is Gaza today. 
 
Were you a true Christian I would advise you to fall down on your knees and pray to God to forgive you for your gross stupidity and lack of compassion. Even as a single mother who presumably loves her child, the notion that you can stand up in public and brazenly support a tribe of racist, self-serving malcontents who are sacrificing and slaughtering little children by the hundreds, is beyond comprehension for anyone, Christian or otherwise, who has and who loves their own children and grandchildren.
 
It begs the question Christie Clark: for what price have you sold your soul to this Machiavellian agenda that political Zionism has created around the world? We all, by now, realize the inordinate influence of the Jewish lobby and the “power of their purse” as well as the absolute media control that they have here in Canada and around the globe, all of which only makes them that much more delusional, believing in their own rabbinically induced phantasy that they are somehow, “God’s chosen people” destined to become the heirs to not only all of Palestine but to the planet itself. They obviously have chosen of their own accord to assume such a mantle of malicious intent and ill-will and mask it behind their endless lies and media cover ups which you, in your servile display of flattery and obsequiousness before the crowd assembled at the Temple Sholom synagogue in Vancouver have only helped to exacerbate.
 
Your pretentiousness and arrogance in thinking that by aligning your party and the province with this dark, sinister, demonic and evil presence you will somehow gain any positive benefits for B.C. or your party is both ill-conceived and erroneous. You’ve only brought shame and disgrace to our province and shown the world that you and your Liberal party are nothing more than complicit, guilty war criminals deserving of nothing less than to be removed from office and banished from Canada forever.   
 

Sincerely,

 
 
Arthur Topham
Pub/Ed
Canada’s Radical News Network
“Digging to the root of the issues since 1998”
––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

 

Bad Moon Rising: How the Jewish Lobbies Created Canada’s “Hate Propaganda” Laws by Arthur Topham

BadMoonRisingHeader 800 copy 4

 

Bad Moon Rising: 

How the Jewish Lobbies Created Canada’s “Hate Propaganda” Laws

By 

Arthur Topham

“Therefore whosoever heareth these sayings of mine, and doeth them,
I will liken him unto a wise man, which built his house upon a rock:
And the rain descended, and the floods came, and the winds blew, and
beat upon that house; and it fell not: for it was founded upon a rock.
And everyone that heareth these sayings of mine, and doeth them not,
Shall be likened unto a foolish man, which built his house upon the sand:
And the rain descended, and the floods came, and the winds blew, and
Beat upon that house; and it fell: and great was the fall of it.”
~ Jesus Christ, St. Matthew Ch. 7, vs 24 -27

 

My assertion, as stated in the title to this article, that Canada’s judicial system has been infiltrated and co-opted by foreign Zionist Jew lobby groups operating in Canada since 1919, will automatically be met with a loud hue and cry of “preposterous! outrageous!” followed immediately by much hand-wringing and declamations of “anti-Semitism”,”hate”,”racism” and further punctuated, dramatized and broadcast across the nation via the the Zionist-controlled mainstream media.

So be it. It doesn’t detract one iota from the facts. All such reactionary responses only reinforce the premise of my argument that Canada’s Zionist Jew media cartel is, and always has been, an integral part of their overall plan to formulate and establish Orwellian laws inimical to the rights and freedoms of the people. Frankly stated it’s the modus operandi of these foreign-controlled Jewish lobbies to react precisely in this fashion for that is how they mendaciously twist and stifle debate on any issue of national importance to Canadians; be it our Charter rights or our fundamental right (and responsibility as patriotic protectors of our country) to question the direction of the nation’s foreign policies which, under the current Harper regime, are deliberately replacing the nation’s longstanding principles of common sense and aligning our once relatively respected political ideals with the present agenda of the Zionist Jewish state of Israel, considered by most intelligent people to be the most rogue, racist, supremacist, violent, atheistic and apartheid nation on the face of the planet.

It’s my fervent contention that the template for Canada’s “Hate Propaganda” legislation was, from the start, designed in such a way as to function as a legal shield; a mechanism which the Zionist lobbyists use to defend themselves against any allegations aimed at exposing their covert actions; all of which are meant to benefit their inordinate influence over Canadian politics and the criminal actions of the foreign state of Israel; Harper, of course, being their current Trojan Horse, front man in this deliberate, ongoing, slow motion coup to capture the nation’s political and legal systems.

When we go back in history and retrace the steps that these legal interlopers have taken since the end of World War 2 it’s clearly evident what they’ve been up to, especially in light of the now increasing displeasure that more and more Canadians are showing toward the actions of the Jewish lobbies when it comes to their relentless, telling attacks upon our Charter of Rights and Freedoms which include our fundamental right to freedom of expression as stated in Sec. 2b of the Charter.

For those still unfamiliar with this fundamental right it states:

2. Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms:

(b) freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication.

All that’s required in order to verify this war against our rights and freedoms, including our most basic right of speaking out and expressing our views on issues vital to our national well being, is to delve into any and all of the legal cases over the past forty four years associated with the issue of freedom of expression and one will see immediately that in practically every instance the first special interest lobby group lining up and vying for intervenor status is inevitably a Jewish one. And furthermore, concomitant with their zealousness to intervene is usually the underlying fact that it is they themselves who were instrumental in bringing forth the charges. And if that isn’t the norm then they’re undoubtedly there to make sure that the complainant (usually an agent in one form or another) gets the maximum support of their power and influence in the courts and the media.

The foundation for all of this pretense and deceit was laid at the end of the last world war when the Zionist-controlled U.K. and USA began cranking up their deliberately orchestrated accusations that Hitler and the German military were guilty of having attempted to wipe out the Jews in Europe by gassing millions of them and then cremating the innocent souls in ovens to cover up their horrendously heinous crime. The Nuremberg Trials at the war’s end were the focus of these fantastic claims of willful genocide by gas and fire and the West, still mesmerized by the massive amounts of anti-German hate propaganda which they had been saturated with for the past six years, as well as being shell-shocked from all the fighting, killing, bombing and destruction, fell prey to this massive deception and was unwilling or unable to garner the moral fortitude or financial resources necessary to counter these outrageous lies of the powerful Zionist lobby.

Little did it matter that every confession by the captured German military commanders had been gained by torture. Little did it matter that the majority of those running the trials were of Jewish ethnicity. Little did it matter that laws which had been followed by nations for decades were suddenly revised in secrecy just prior to the war’s end and the former International Geneva protocols cast aside and new standards of jurisprudence abruptly introduced into the equation by Jewish judges and the Zionist forces who had gained firm control of the whole charade. This was the hour that they’d planned for and were awaiting since first declaring war on Germany in 1933 when Hitler and the National Socialist Party gained power through legal, democratic means.

Now that the Allies had gained their victory, the Zionists via subterfuge, deception, political pressure and the willing assistance of their controlled media and Hollywood, were finally in a position to have their long sought “6 Million Jewish Holocaust” footings poured, thus assuring themselves of a firm propaganda foundation for the erection of their fabricated phantasy; one that would then allowing for the rest of the subsequent monkey business of taking over and manipulating national and international laws, all of which was based upon their cunningly crafted pretext for tyranny known as the “Holocaust”.

After that landmark lie was accomplished it was merely a matter of time, patient plodding, and endless, inordinate propaganda and pressure placed upon the rest of the population of the world who had still to accept the “Holocaust” hoax and be subsequently convinced of the dire and urgent necessity for enacting legislation that would make it illegal to promote either “genocide” or “hatred” toward any identifiable group.

In principle (and of course based upon the lie of the “6 Million”) these proposals might have appeared laudable and worthy had the mythical “Holocaust” actually occurred and in that context they would most definitely have been noble pursuits to accomplish but that, unfortunately, wasn’t the reality. Only now that the real history of the last eighty years is finally coming to light, thanks to the free and open Internet, are we finally getting to see the original, unadulterated script as it was so cleverly designed by the Zionist forces of the day; a program of diabolic, Machiavellian political pragmatism designed to destroy democratic institutions and replace them with a Zionist-based illuminist, occult vision of a macabre New World Order where they, and only they, would hold all the power and control over the world’s people along with all the resources of the planet.

Such was the set and setting here in Canada when the Jewish lobbies started their underhanded campaign to create “Hate Propaganda” laws that would be and are being used against Canadian citizens today.

One might legitimately say that these deceptive measures to control freedom of speech actually began even before the commencement of WW2. After Hitler and the National Socialist Party came to power in 1933 the Jews in Canada were already growing fearful that Canadians might begin to believe what Germany was saying about the International financiers and the Jewish control of their own beleaguered nation and so in the province of Manitoba, (of all places) the government passed a statute to combat what was apparently perceived to be a “rise in the dissemination of Nazi propaganda”. The premise of which (The Libel Act, R.S.M. 1913, c. 113, s. 13A (added S.M. 1934, c. 23, s. 1) was later to become The Defamation Act, R.S.M. 1987, c. D20, s. 19(1) and was in all likelihood the first volley launched against freedom of expression.

Up until 1970 Section 181 of the Criminal Code, which reads: “Every one who wilfully publishes a statement, tale or news that he knows is false and that causes or is likely to cause injury or mischief to a public interest is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years.” was the only provision in the Code even remotely connected to the offence of group defamation but it didn’t, at the time, specifically make mention of “hate propaganda”.

As stated above, when WW2 ended the work of the Zionist lobbyists began in earnest when their “Holocaust” card began appearing as the foundational pretext to any and all discussions surrounding “human rights” and “discrimination”. The first step in the direction of censorship was the United Nations’ Universal Declaration of Human Rights in 1948 with its references to “hate propaganda” and by 1953 we find that the Canadian Jewish Congress was already diligently pursuing efforts toward this end with their attempt to insert anti-hate propaganda provisions into the Criminal Code which was being revised in that same year.

Their deceptive labours eventually bore fruit when the lobby was finally able to convince Canada’s federal Justice Minister Guy Favreau in 1965 to appoint a special (interest) committee to look into the purported “problems” connected with the dissemination of “hate propaganda” in Canada.

Surprisingly (not) what became known as “The Special Committee on Hate Propaganda in Canada” and later abbreviated (for propaganda purposes) to the “Cohen Committee” was headed by a Jewish lawyer, Dean Maxwell Cohen, Q.C., Dean of the Faculty of Law, McGill University. While not all members of the committee were Jewish there was one other notable lawyer instrumental in aiding the Jewish lobby in their relentless quest for censorship laws. This was none other than Professor Pierre E. Trudeau, Associate Professor of Law, University of Montreal, soon to become Canada’s Prime Minister.

The committee studied the alleged “problem” from January 29th to November 10th, 1965 and their conclusions called for new legislation that ultimately affected the Post Office Act, the Customs Act, and most critically in today’s context, what is now Section 319 of the Criminal Code, the very same section that’s being used to shut down RadicalPress.com and threaten its Publisher and Editor (me) with a possible two year jail sentence for having expressed opinions and facts on Zionism, Jews and the state of Israel.

My case is designed to be the test case for the Jewish lobbyists working in Canada. Should they win and find me guilty under Sec. 319(2) of the Criminal Code of Canada then that precedent will undoubtedly unleash a flood of subsequent attacks upon the rest of the bloggers and publishers and writers and artists living in Canada who also see an imminent threat to their freedom of expression encapsulated in this draconian, Marxist legislation designed with malicious forethought to censor truth and stymie any and all attempts to achieve and maintain justice and freedom of speech in Canada.

Conclusion:

Just as the great parable of Jesus Christ regarding the foolish man who built his house upon the sand has come down through history so too has the foolish attempt by those who call themselves Jews to build an occult house of invisible governance upon the sands of deception, usury and an insatiable lust for power and control over their fellow mortals.

Now that the rains of the peoples’ outrageous indignation and the floods of perceived injustice and repression of personal freedoms and the winds of Truth and Freedom are beginning to beat with greater and greater intensity upon the once mighty and powerful House of Zion (thanks to the miracle of the Internet), the underpinnings of this deceptive, age-old hoax are giving way and, should the people continue to unite and persevere in their staunch resistance to and abolition of all the “Hate Propaganda” laws now being used against them then soon, and with great relief and thankfulness, will come the fall of this House of Horrors and a new beginning for those who want only peace and love and justice and brotherhood to reign supreme.

—-

 

Auch Mein Kampf (My Struggle Too) by Arthur Topham

AuchMeinKampfNew600 copy

 

Screen Shot 2014-03-24 at 12.43.31 PM

 Auch Mein Kampf
(My Struggle Too)

By
Arthur Topham
March 24th, 2014

 

The pursuit of truth is never an easy path. Every man and every woman who has ever struggled to understand their place in the world and the reasons for why things are as they are will attest to the fundamental veracity of such a statement.  From the moment of that first conscious step along the endless journey of searching out Life’s mysteries the work begins, and it rarely ceases until one’s last breath has been taken. 

Such, I believe, was the case with Adolf Hitler in his own natural pursuit of understanding when, as a young and budding artist, he was forced by life’s exigencies to face and question the economic and political realities of life in Austria during the beginning stages of the 20 century. And so it remains today for multitudes, if not millions of souls, who also are being coerced by current circumstances into asking the very same questions of life that this historic figure once did. It is in this sense that I wish to draw a parallel between my own political unfoldment and that of Adolf Hitler and, in the process, try to reveal how Adolf’s struggle to understand what the world perceives as the “Jewish Question” was my struggle too and how my personal revelations respecting this ongoing phenomenon inevitably (as I later learned), turned out to be synonymous with his.

I must, in stating the above (and I believe I can state this with a high degree of confidence), also add that in my own case, after close to five decades of perseverance beginning at age 20, that this process of coming to terms with the Jewish Question is not in any way unique to myself but, in fact, is the case for anyone who sincerely strives to discern fact from fiction and truth from intentional deception in a world of duality that, by its very nature, inevitably forces the truth seeker to search for reasons for why things are as they are.

That said I wish to begin with a brief outline of my own life that will lead directly into the current topic of discussion.

In many respects I led a simple, normal life from birth until early manhood; one unencumbered by any of a multitude of possible scenarios wherein a child might have been negatively affected to the point that their subsequent growth might easily have been overshadowed by either physical, mental, emotional or sexual abuse, sickness, extreme religious indoctrination, family breakup or any of a myriad number of possibilities wherein their natural development could have suffered retardation in one form or another.

When I graduated from high school at the age of eighteen I was, for the most part, a regular, acceptable member of the society of my day albeit with a nascent streak of the rebel already present in my personality. My health was intact; my sexuality was normal; my moral fibre was of a nature that might best be described as that of a small “c” Christian and my intellectual capacities were well within the accepted parameters of the time.

I had been born in the late forties and up to the mid-fifties raised on a small farm in the central region of the Canadian prairies and had virtually no experience with urban living during that period of my growth. I was in a very real sense one of Mother Nature’s sons. When the year 1956 drew to a close my rural life ended with the sale of our farm and my family relocated to British Columbia to a northern coastal community called Kitimat where my father had found employment in what was then one of Canada’s newest and boldest economic undertakings by the Aluminum Company of Canada aka Alcan.

My arrival in Kitimat marked a pivotal point in what would later become a life time preoccupation with political pursuits in general but in particular with my involvement with things Germanic.

Just how this came about is still in some respects a mystery to me but the setting in which my interest in things related to Germany first became apparent was due to the time and place in which I then found myself. The second world war had ended only eleven years prior to my relocation to Canada’s latest “instant” city carved out of wilds of the West coast rainforest and because of the nature of the development itself there was a need for a large number of workers to fill the positions that suddenly became available with the advent of a major industrial project such as Kitimat then was.

This need translated into a massive influx of immigrants from Europe to fill the quota of required manpower and thus the new town became, in a very real and practically sense almost overnight, a miniature version of a European city composed of racial or ethnic elements from most, if not all, of the major nations from that region of the globe. The most predominant countries represented were Germany, Italy, Portugal, Hungary and the U.K. followed by a lesser assortment of Slavic countries and the Nordic nations of Sweden, Norway and Iceland. In other words Kitimat, from its onset, became a microcosm of European identities all bundled up together and situated in a veritable wilderness where, prior to then, only the First Nation Haisla people had lived from time immemorial.

I was in Grade Four when I moved to this small city and from then on I attended school with this broad, heterogeneous assortment of kids who, for the most part, were still learning to speak English when they first entered their Canadian classrooms. In fact, the English speaking students and their parents at that time were a minority in the city. It was there that I began my lifelong association with the German people.

In the fall of 1965, having achieved grades sufficient to permit me to enter an institution of higher learning, I applied to begin general studies at the newly created Simon Fraser University in Burnaby, B.C. an institution which opened its doors for the first time that very same year. I packed up my bags, hopped into my 1956 VW “bug” and wended my way down the province to the southern coast to begin my new academic life.

My parents were never affluent and so it was necessary for me to apply for student loans in order to survive. As well I had Ukrainian relatives from my mother’s side of the family who were living in the Vancouver area and so I was able to take up residence with one of my aunts and my maternal Grandmother and begin my studies.

Simon Fraser University (SFU) at that time was Canada’s newest and most controversial universities of the day. When I applied for admission I knew nothing about its origins or organization other than what I had gleaned from all the coloured brochures that were published to promote it. What was apparent though (and again, I was much too ignorant of the political system at that time to realize it) was the fact that the university was staffed by a rather large contingent of professors and academics who, for lack of a better term, might best be classified as Marxists in one form or another. Many came from the USA but others also arrived from the U.K. bearing credentials from prestigious Marxist institutions such as the London School of Economics. One of my professors at that period was the renowned Marxist sociologist Thomas Burton Bottomore, who was head of the Department of Political Science, Sociology and Anthropology at SFU from 1965 to 1967.

It was this stage of my life that most closely resembled that of Adolf Hitler’s own political unfoldment as contained in Chapter 2 of his autobiography, Mein Kampf (My Struggle) and titled “Years of Study and Suffering in Vienna”.

In Adolf’s case he had arrived in Vienna hoping to enter Art school to become a painter but for reasons now apparent Fate held another path for the young aspiring artist and his plans were suddenly dashed leaving him on his own to survive and refocus on a career in Architecture; one that would involve living impoverished in Vienna. It was, as he described it, “during this period that my eyes were opened to two perils, the names of which I scarcely knew hitherto and had no notion whatsoever of their terrible significance for the existence of the German people. These two perils were Marxism and Judaism.”

That one statement alone might easily encapsulate all of what has transpired in my own life over the past forty-nine years since entering SFU. Up until then the only “Marx” that I’d ever been even vaguely aware of was Groucho Marx, leader of the Marx Brothers Hollywood comedy act. Whatever history lessons that I had attended throughout high school obviously hadn’t prepared me for what was forthcoming at the university level.

And so much of my academic life was steeped in Marxist indoctrination from the onset and I, in my naiveté did my best to soak it up in order to maintain my Grade Point Average and move from semester to semester on my way to a degree which I hadn’t, as yet, even determined.

The Sixties, as most now recognize, was a period of intense political and spiritual upheaval, not only in B.C. but around the world and as a result of all of the unexpected changes the minds of many of the youth of the day were affected in ways that might best be described by the term “radical”. Like an unannounced bolt of lightning from out of a clear blue sky the youth of the Sixties were suddenly introduced to an intense period of political unrest coupled with the strange and mystifying world of psychedelic drugs, a factor that would ultimately end up playing a major role in subsequent changes to both the cultural and spiritual unfoldment of generations to come. It was a world in which I too would soon be immersed but before those changes occurred I had already acquired a certain prescience of mind with respect to the actual substance and intent of the Marxist ideology that I’d been so assiduously studying for the past two years at university.

One incident best describes what I mean. As with all universities, as a student I was constantly wondering about from class to class, passing by wall after wall and window after window covered with whatever propaganda the young and inquisitive minds of students had posted there to gain the attention of the world. One particular poster made mention of a meeting being held in the downtown east side of Vancouver organized by a group of Marxist Leninists. Being at the time familiar with them thanks to the indoctrination in my Political Science classes I decided to attend and see what was going on. When I arrived at the venue and milled about anonymously observing the posters and books and listening to the rhetoric of those present I suddenly began experiencing what might best be described as a gut feeling or an intuitive sense of something dark and sinister lurking within the atmosphere of the small crowd of Marxist adherents present in the room. It must have made a very poignant impression on me for afterwards I never forgot it and was also never able to feel a positive connection with the doctrine from that point on.

In Adolf’s predicament, respecting the two “perils” of Marxism and Judaism he states, “It is impossible to say when I might have started to make a thorough study of the doctrine and characteristics of Marxism were it not for the fact that I then literally ran head foremost into the problem.” The “problem” as it turned out was the influential Social Democratic Party of his day and his eventual awakening to its aims and intentions and to those who were controlling its inner workings.

And so it was this small, seemingly incidental experience with a meeting of a group of Marxist Leninists that I now relate to Hitler’s experiences with the Social Democratic Party (albeit in much greater detail) and which first made me wary of all things Marxist but, in terms of Adolf’s second “peril”, Judaism, that one would remain an enigma for decades to come before I finally was able to fit the piece into the puzzle making the picture complete. In fact, in the case of Judaism, I truly never made the connection until around thirty years after than incident in east Vancouver.

Adolf, on the other hand, having to forego his passion to become an artist and also having to survive somehow in Vienna, turned to working as a labourer in the building trades. It was then that he began encountering the actual effects of the Marxists and their ideology and how it played upon the workmen of his time. Soon after finding work he was forced to join a “trades union” in order to continue working and once in the union he was then surrounded by workers whose on the job discussions inevitably revolved around Marxist rhetoric; rhetoric that Adolf had to endure listening to over and over; rhetoric that consisted of repeated attacks upon all the things that he held dear to his heart.

As he put it, “I drank my bottle of milk and ate my morsel of bread somewhere on the outskirts, while I circumspectly studied my environment or else fell to meditating on my own harsh lot. Yet I heard more than enough. And I often thought that some of what they said was meant for my ears, in the hope of bringing me to a decision. But all that I heard had the effect of arousing the strongest antagonism in me. Everything was disparaged – the nation, because it was held to be an invention of the ‘capitalist’ class (how often I had to listen to that phrase!); the Fatherland, because it was held to be an instrument in the hands of the bourgeoisie for the exploitation of the working masses; the authority of the law, because that was a means of holding down the proletariat; religion, as a means of doping the people, so as to exploit them afterwards; morality, as a badge of stupid and sheepish docility. There was nothing that they did not drag in the mud.”

Eventually the endless bashing of Adolf’s ideals prompted him to join in the discussions in order to argue against the Marxist dogma of doom and gloom. That went on for a period of time until Adolf, determined to understand his subject and having studied in detail the literature, was able to advance his arguments to the point where the Marxists of his day were unable to refute his position. This inevitably led to a situation that is all too familiar. As Adolf described it, “From day to day I was becoming better informed than my companions in the subjects on which they claimed to be experts. Then a day came when the more redoubtable of my adversaries resorted to the most effective weapon they had to replace the force of reason. This was intimidation and physical force. Some of the leaders among my adversaries ordered me to leave the building or else get flung down from the scaffolding. As I was quite alone I could not put up any physical resistance; so I chose the first alternative and departed, richer however by the experience. I went away full of disgust; but at the same time so deeply moved that it was quite impossible for me to turn my back on the whole situation and think no more about it.”

As time passed Adolf continued studying in depth the behaviour of the Social Democracy Party and made it a priority to search out what he described as the “inner nature” of its doctrines. That of course, as with all things political in the modern era, inevitably led to only one eventual root cause and it was, therefore, at this juncture in both Adolf’s and my own quest for understanding of the political Gordian Knot, where we come to what is know historically as the “Jewish Question”.

Adolf put it best when first broaching the subject of who it was pulling the levers behind the facade of the Social Democratic Party for after some years of trying to discern the modus operandi of the Marxists and their control of the Social Democrats, he finally put two and two together and realized that what stood behind all of the doctrinaire rhetoric and literature of this gargantuan Marxist political monolith was a select group of individuals who were for the most part all adherents of a particular religion known as Judaism. It was that realization which prompted Hitler to state, “Knowledge of the Jews is the only key whereby one may understand the inner nature and therefore the real aims of Social Democracy.”

When I first began reading Mein Kampf a few years ago and reached the chapter which is the subject of this essay I was struck to the core of my being by the sudden knowledge of Adolf’s own personal awakening to the Jewish Question. Because of a lifetime immersed in a mental/intellectual atmosphere of thick, dark, maliciously impenetrable propaganda designed to force every young mind into believing that Adolf Hitler was the ultimate epitome of evil I had come to the conclusion years ago that Herr Hitler must have emerged, fully formed from the womb, a rabid and sinister anti-Semite who was already bashing his self-chosen brethren with his spoon while still seated in his high chair! Nothing less that such a conclusion could be drawn given the volumes of viperous vituperation and the multitude of morose and malevolently motivated Hollywood movies that constantly portrayed this consummate hater of Jews as the master of lies and the begetter of all bigotry toward God’s chosen people.

Now the truth had finally been revealed to me and I realized that my own awakening to this insidious deception so closely resembled that of Adolf’s that time literally stood still and in that instant realm of realization I understood not only Hitler’s soul but the soul of everyone who has come face to face with this eternal conundrum.

Adolf, in his precisely poignant language, describes how this process started:

“To-day it is hard and almost impossible for me to say when the word ‘Jew’ first began to raise any particular thought in my mind. I do not remember even having heard the word at home during my father’s lifetime. If this name were mentioned in a derogatory sense I think the old gentleman would just have considered those who used it in this way as being uneducated reactionaries. In the course of his career he had come to be more or less a cosmopolitan, with strong views on nationalism, which had its effect on me as well. In school, too, I found no reason to alter the picture of things I had formed at home.

“It was not until I was fourteen or fifteen years old that I frequently ran up against the word ‘Jew’, partly in connection with political controversies. These references aroused a slight aversion in me, and I could not avoid an uncomfortable feeling which always came over me when I had to listen to religious disputes. But at that time I had no other feelings about the Jewish question.

“There were very few Jews in Linz. In the course of centuries the Jews who lived there had become Europeanized in external appearance and were so much like other human beings that I even looked upon them as Germans. The reason why I did not then perceive the absurdity of such an illusion was that the only external mark which I recognized as distinguishing them from us was the practice of their strange religion. As I thought that they were persecuted on account of their Faith my aversion to hearing remarks against them grew almost into a feeling of abhorrence. I did not in the least suspect that there could be such a thing as a systematic anti-Semitism.

“Then I came to Vienna.

“I will not say that the manner in which I first became acquainted with it [the Jewish question. Ed.] was particularly unpleasant for me. In the Jew I still saw only a man who was of a different religion, and therefore, on grounds of human tolerance, I was against the idea that he should be attacked because he had a different faith. And so I considered that the tone adopted by the anti-Semitic Press in Vienna was unworthy of the cultural traditions of a great people. The memory of certain events which happened in the middle ages came into my mind, and I felt that I should not like to see them repeated. Generally speaking, these anti-Semitic newspapers did not belong to the first rank – but I did not then understand the reason of this – and so I regarded them more as the products of jealousy and envy rather than the expression of a sincere, though wrong-headed, feeling.

“My own opinions were confirmed by what I considered to be the infinitely more dignified manner in which the really great Press replied to those attacks or simply ignored them, which latter seemed to me the most respectable way.

“I diligently read what was generally called the World Press – Neue Freie Presse, Wiener Tageblatt, etc. – and I was astonished by the abundance of information they gave their readers and the impartial way in which they presented particular problems. I appreciated their dignified tone; but sometimes the flamboyancy of the style was unconvincing, and I did not like it. But I attributed all this to the overpowering influence of the world metropolis.”

These excerpts from Mein Kampf basically epitomize my own experience with respect to the Jews as I once perceived them. Like Adolf I had never had any dealings with them. I had grown up among Prairie farmers most of whom were either of British descent or else were German immigrants or Ukrainian Doukhobors of whom my mother was one. Even throughout my elementary and high school years I don’t recollect ever hearing about Jews and I also don’t recall there being any Jews in Kitimat although there may well have been the odd one in the form of a banker or a lawyer or a physician. My first actual encounter with a Jewish person was while at university when a fellow female student took a liking to me and we ended up communicating for a short while and she told me that she came from a Jewish family. At the time it meant nothing to me and the relationship never progressed beyond that of a brief acquaintanceship.

The ugly face of Zionism didn’t appeared before my eyes until around 1987 when, in the course of working on a letter to the local newspaper and researching information concerning the upheavals in Nicaragua and Guatemala, I came across and read Noam Chomsky’s pivotal book The Fateful Triangle: Israel, the United States and the Palestinians. That was my first glimpse of Israel, the ADL and the Zionist ideology.

Of course I wasn’t unaware of the problems going on in the Middle East at the time but all of the printed materials in the press of the day was so confusing that my mind simply turned away and avoided any attempt to fathom it all.

When I started my monthly tabloid The Radical in June of 1998 I was still relatively clueless on the main points with respect to Adolf Hitler and the National Socialist Party. In fact in various editions of the paper I would, at times, make reference to Hitler and the “nazis” in a negative manner simply because I was then under the Zionist-created illusion that had been drummed into my mind throughout my lifetime. Thank goodness that one of my German readers out in Ontario eventually wrote a “Letter to the Editor” in which they kindly implored me to take a second look at my thinking on the subject. When I published the letter in the next edition of the paper I began to get additional letters admonishing me to not change my former stance on Hitler and that’s when the light slowly began to break upon the horizon of my mind and skepticism on the subject of all that I had been brainwashed into believing about Germany and Adolf Hitler and the National Socialists began to take hold.

And so it was for Adolf Hitler a hundred years ago when he arrived in Vienna knowing little of the Zionist Jews and thinking that the “mainstream media” of his day – what he referred to as the “World Press” – was the best place to find impartial, independent journalistic reportage of political events.

But as time passed his regular study of the Vienna press began revealing discrepancies which made Adolf question their motives. One example in particular was the newspapers’ position on Germany’s then Emperor William II. A campaign was underway initiated by members of the Reichstag that angered Adolf immensely. Basically it prohibited William II from addressing parliament and, as Adolf viewed it, “The fact that the Emperor was prohibited from speaking in the Reichstag made me very angry, because the prohibition came from a side which in my eyes had no authority to make it. For at a single sitting those same parliamentary ganders did more cackling together than the whole dynasty of Emperors, comprising even the weakest, had done in the course of centuries.

It annoyed me to have to acknowledge that in a nation where any half-witted fellow could claim for himself the right to criticize and might even be let loose on the people as a ‘Legislator’ in the Reichstag, the bearer of the Imperial Crown could be the subject of a ‘reprimand’ on the part of the most miserable assembly of drivellers that had ever existed.”

Eventually Adolf began looking beyond the great Vienna Press at some of the other publications; ones which, at the time, he considered to be “anti-Semitic” in nature, in particular the Deutsche Volksblatt. But as it turned out it was in that publication that he came across the work of Dr. Karl Lueger and his Christian Socialist Movement. Setting aside his preconceived notions about the publication Adolf began reading about Leuger and as he later wrote, “even an elementary sense of justice enforced me to change my opinion when I had the opportunity of knowing the man and his work, and slowly that opinion grew into outspoken admiration when I had better grounds for forming a judgment. To-day, as well as then, I hold Dr. Karl Lueger as the most eminent type of German Burgermeister. How many prejudices were thrown over through such a change in my attitude towards the Christian-Socialist Movement!

My ideas about anti-Semitism changed also in the course of time, but that was the change which I found most difficult. It cost me a greater internal conflict with myself, and it was only after a struggle between reason and sentiment that victory began to be decided in favour of the former. Two years later sentiment rallied to the side of reasons and became a faithful guardian and counsellor.

At the time of this bitter struggle, between calm reason and the sentiments in which I had been brought up, the lessons that I learned on the streets of Vienna rendered me invaluable assistance.”

It was then that Adolf began looking elsewhere for answers to the hidden questions that plagued his understanding. He purchased some anti-Semitic pamphlets but upon reading them found too many discrepancies in the literature. As he put it, “The subject appeared so enormous and the accusations were so far-reaching that I was afraid of dealing with it unjustly and so I became again anxious and uncertain.”

This was also the period that Adolf became aware of the Zionist movement which had taken outward form back in 1897 in Basel, Switzerland and was now building strength in Vienna. The more he studied it the more he realized that while amongst the Jews themselves they gave the outward appearance of being in disagreement over the aims of the new organization, beneath all the rhetoric he sensed a concerted effort to remain unified; a deliberate plan that concealed from the general public by the press. In his words, “Thus there was no real rift in their internal solidarity. This fictitious conflict between the Zionists and the Liberal Jews soon disgusted me; for it was false through and through and in direct contradiction to the moral dignity and immaculate character on which that race had always prided itself.”

Once the aperture of truth began opening Adolf’s view of Judaism and Zionism took on greater clarity. As he put it, “In my eyes the charge against Judaism became a grave one the moment I discovered the Jewish activities in the Press, in art, in literature and the theatre. All unctuous protests were now more or less futile. One needed only to look at the posters announcing the hideous productions of the cinema and theatre, and study the names of the authors who were highly lauded there in order to become permanently adamant on Jewish questions.”

Before long, he states: “I began then to investigate carefully the names of all the fabricators of these unclean products in public cultural life. The result of that inquiry was still more disfavourable to the attitude which I had hitherto held in regard to the Jews. Though my feelings might rebel a thousand time, reason now had to draw its own conclusions.

The fact that nine-tenths of all the smutty literature, artistic tripe and theatrical banalities, had to be charged to the account of people who formed scarcely one per cent of the nation – that fact could not be gainsaid. It was there, and had to be admitted. Then I began to examine my favourite ‘World Press’, with that fact before my mind.

The deeper my soundings went the lesser grew my respect for that Press which I formerly admired. Its style became still more repellent and I was forced to reject its ideas as entirely shallow and superficial. To claim that in the presentation of facts and views its attitude was impartial seemed to me to contain more falsehood than truth. The writers were – Jews.

I had now no more hesitation about bringing the Jewish problem to light in all its details. No. Henceforth I was determined to do so. But as I learned to track down the Jew in all the different spheres of cultural and artistic life, and in the various manifestations of this life everywhere, I suddenly came upon him in a position where I had least expected to find him. I now realized that the Jews were the leaders of Social Democracy. In face of that revelation the scales fell from my eyes. My long inner struggle was at an end.”

This aspect of Adolf Hitler’s political awakening to the depth of Jewish pervasiveness of German culture and control of the German print media is one of the most enduring,instructive features to come down through history and now present itself for juxtaposition to those who are presently seeking a realistic understanding of how the current state of the world’s volatile and unpredictable political climate has come about. It provides the reader and researcher with a direct link to the overwhelming power and influence of what today is commonly referred to as the “mainstream press or media”.

In my own case and in the case of countless others who’ve experienced a similar epiphany of understanding, whenever it clicks; whenever it gels; whenever it suddenly comes into focus; whenever that missing piece of the puzzle finally appears in the mind’s eye; that’s when each of us experiences the same “revelation” that Adolf Hitler did back in Vienna and that’s also when there is no turning back, no return to a denial of this fundamental truth.

Adolf’s concluding remarks on the subject of Jewish Marxism and Judaism as found in Chapter Two of Mein Kampf bear careful reading for they are some of the most profoundly prophetic words ever written on the Jewish Question and are as intensely relevant today as they were a century ago. He sums up his experience in Vienna with the following:

“As I critically reviewed the activities of the Jewish people throughout long periods of history I became anxious and asked myself whether for some inscrutable reasons beyond the comprehension of poor mortals such as ourselves, Destiny may not have irrevocably decreed that the final victory must go to this small nation? May it not be that this people which has lived only for the earth has been promised the earth as a recompense? Is our right to struggle for our own self-preservation based on reality, or is it a merely subjective thing? Fate answered the question for me inasmuch as it led me to make a detached and exhaustive inquiry into the Marxist teaching and the activities of the Jewish people in connection with it.

The Jewish doctrine of Marxism repudiates the aristocratic principle of Nature and substitutes for it the eternal privilege of force and energy, numerical mass and its dead weight. Thus it denies the individual worth of the human personality, impugns the teaching that nationhood and race have a primary significance, and by doing this it takes away the very foundations of human existence and human civilization. If the Marxist teaching were to be accepted as the foundation of the life of the universe, it would lead to the disappearance of all order that is conceivable to the human mind. And thus the adoption of such a law would provoke chaos in the structure of the greatest organism that we know, with the result that the inhabitants of this earthly planet would finally disappear.

Should the Jew, with the aid of his Marxist creed, triumph over the people of this world, his Crown will be the funeral wreath of mankind, and this planet will once again follow its orbit through the ether, without any human life on its surface, as it did millions of years ago.

And so I believe today that my conduct is in accordance with the will of the Almighty Creator. In standing guard against the Jew I am defending the handiwork of the Lord.”

Thus we see exemplified, after studying the highlights of Adolf Hitler’s quest to understand the world in which he lived while in Vienna and his connection to the Jews and their eternal handiwork, none other than ourselves and our own personal quest for truth. And therein lies both the magic and the mystery of this amazing man who, once he knew with absolute certainty what the problem was, devoted the remainder of his life to the struggle to show his people how they too could understand their own dilemmas and the dilemma of the German nation itself. And here again one might just as easily state that the fate of Germany also symbolized the fate of every nation when it came to the question of their survival as sovereign, democratic, independent and free countries.

Today the world stands precariously poised on the edge of a dark and frightening abyss; one that without exaggeration threatens all life on the planet and ominously resembles the same political scenario that Adolf Hitler warned his people of back in the midst of the 1920’s when Mein Kampf first appeared in print. The world, unfortunately, didn’t get it then and from 1939 onward to the present day, it still hasn’t got it and all the while that it languished in its artificially induced, mind-controlled, Zionist-created coma, the Jewish Marxist juggernaut continued on in its unrelenting pursuit of power and control over the minds of humanity and the resources of the planet.

Adolf Hitler, for all his genius and determination, wasn’t able to breech the barriers of Zionist imposed ignorance that the Jewish-controlled media machine of his day had placed upon the nations of the Western world. When he came to power in Germany in 1933 his party and his nation represented the only viable alternative to the growing threat of Marxist communist totalitarianism but at the same precise moment in history the strongest nation on earth, the United States of America, had also just voted in a political party that was firmly in the hands of the Marxist Jewish communist cartel and so for all of Germany’s heroic and noble efforts to stop the Zionist communist onslaught coming out of the Soviet Union, their strength of purpose was never fully appreciated or understood by those who, through deception, coercion, bribery and malice, had joined the cult of Marxist communist cruelty and ended up backing the forces of evil over those which would have stemmed the growing tide of terror and war which has since washed over the planet and now appears ready to engulf in full what Hitler reverently referred to as “the handiwork of the Lord.”

And so here is where we finally come to the crux of the whole issue of the Jewish Question and all that it entails in terms of the past century’s analysis plus what is currently going on at an even greater pitch now that global circumstances have reached such critical proportions. What’s plainly evident to observers who have mastered the formerly unresolved equation of the inordinate and lethally dangerous power and influence of the Zionist Jews and their worldwide lobby network is that the problem itself, persistently and adamantly concealed behind the colossal deception known as the “6 Million Jewish Holocaust” and promulgated mercilessly by the Jewish controlled media propaganda machine since the end of World War 2, has now reached proportions that threaten the actual survival of humanity itself and therefore must, beyond all else, command our immediate and undivided attention.

—–

Alain Soral and Gilad Atzmon on Jewish Power and cultural narcissism Interview by Alimuddin Usmani

http://www.gilad.co.uk/writings/alain-soral-and-gilad-atzmon-on-jewish-power-and-cultural-na.html

Alain Soral and Gilad Atzmon on Jewish Power and cultural narcissism

Saturday, March 8, 2014  Gilad Atzmon

An Interview by Alimuddin Usmani 

Translated by Romain Redouin

Alain&Gilad

 

 (http://www.egaliteetreconciliation.fr)

 

“The real meaning of Jewish Power is the capacity to silence the discussion of Jewish power”

~ Gilad Atzmon

 

Alain Soral and Gilad Atzmon have each faced (and perhaps welcomed) criticism and controversy as a result of their intellectual inquiries  and honest reasoning. Neither man has shied away from politically incorrect observations including  those on issues of Zionism, culture, Europe or freedom of speech.

How  did you get to know each other?

 AS: I first got to know  Gilad through his  music. I am a jazz lover  and have long appreciated Gilad who is an internationally known and admired  musician. Gilad also played with Robert Wyatt who has been my favorite musician since I was 16.

Gilad and I met in person two years ago at the Paris Book Fair. He was there to finalize the contract of his latest book, “The Wandering Who?” which is co-published by my publishing company, Kontre Kulture.

I am blown away by Gilad’s courage  and lucidity. By culture and experience I have seen that those Jews who are able to tear the veil of tribalism to reach the  authentic universal are very rare, although they are always the best!

GA: Soral published one of the two French editions of my latest book, “The Wandering Who.” I met him at  the Paris book fair 2 years ago and in spite of the language barrier between us, I have managed to learn a lot from him. Soral is one of the last European intellectuals. And it is far from surprising that the Left is outraged by his profound political and ideological insights.

For quite a while those who oppose, satirize or criticize the domination of the Zionist lobby within French politics and media, seem to be subject to political abuse and judicial persecution. Why do you think the Zionist elite choose to target France in particular?

AS: It should be noted first that France has, or suffers from – depending on your point of view –  what is by far the largest Jewish community in Europe, with nearly 700,000 members, while  Italy or Spain, for example, have about  40,000. The pressure and the influence of this very organized  community on French power and policy are inevitably proportional to its size.

There are also some historical components that are particular to France: France prides itself on being the country of human rights, it was the first nation to emancipate the Jews of Europe, it had the Dreyfus affair, the maintained guilt of Petainism, the Zionism of the Fourth Republic, the dominance of the Grand Orient masonry on the supposedly French socialist left … These are some of the many factors that  give our “organized Jewish community” as it defines itself, its effective and overwhelming position of moral watchdog.

GA:  I think that the Jewish Lobby is particularly forceful in France as a result of the impact of the ’68 student revolution. French society has been broken into a multitude of identity groups, and the more broken a society is, the more it tends to subscribe to Jewish politics. The reason is simple. After 3000 years of tribal exilic operation, the Jewish intelligencia is the most advanced in identity sectarian politics and cultural manipulation.

The gist of identity politics is an attempt to transform the cohesive host nation into a myriad of godless synagogues.  To some extent, Soral and Dieudonné have managed to unite what is left of the French working class; which includes Muslims,  Arabs, Blacks and  Whites. And as we have seen, the Jews and the Socialists see this development as an imminent danger.

A controversial anti-immigration initiative won the backing of the Swiss electorate on February 9. EU politicians reacted harshly, some even  threatened  Switzerland. For its part, the State of Israel continues to enforce an immigration policy based  solely on the criteria of Jewish ethnicity, without receiving any criticism from the EU. How should we interpret this discrepancy?

AS: I think one of the best definitions of power, for those who have ceased to harbor illusions of democratic equality is: “Give to yourself and yourself alone the right to do the opposite of what you brutally require from others”.

The Zionist Jewish community, which dominates the Western discourse,  requires the goyim to behave as men of the left: anti-racist and anti-nationalist … While they themselves behave as far right-wing men through their shameless support of a country (Israel) which is openly racist and ultra-nationalist.

GA: It is very simple. As much as  Jewish intelligencia, wants to break the host nation, to dismantle its cohesive narrative, and debase the patriotic impetus, the Jewish State is committed to Jewish interests that represent the complete opposite of the ideology it espouses. Israel defines itself as the Jewish State and  it subscribes to a racist, expansionist, nationalist and patriotic ideology.  This may seem to be a discrepancy, but in fact it isn’t.

The above dual ethic is actually engraved in Jewish emancipation philosophy.  The Jewish Haskala (enlightenment) motto that is mistakenly attributed to Moses Mendelssohn  instructs  the Jew- “be a Jew in your tent and a man on the street.” It teaches the Israelite to behave as a Jew at home but, while in the street to pretend to be a goy. This  perplexing dishonest dualism  (one lies to God at home while misleading the Goy in the street) explains the contradiction between the Jewish intelligencia call for diversity in the West, on the one hand, and the adherence to hard core patriotism in the Jewish State, on the other hand. The Jewish Haskala dual existential mode allows a clear distinction between the ‘Goyim universe’ and the ‘Jewish ghetto.’  In practice, Jewish intellectuals would teach  the Goyim about diversity and tolerance, yet defend  vile Judeo-centrism at home, i.e., Israel.

The expression “Judeo-Masonic conspiracy” is mainly used to discredit those who criticize the bond between the Masonic and the Zionist network. Is it possible to demonstrate this bond without being locked up in a “reductio ad hitlerum”?

AS: No. The term “Judeo-Masonic Plutocracy” has cradled all the 30’s far-right discourse, so it’s now an unusable phrase.

Yet, it is enough to look at the claimed alliances currently in in the mondialist process to objectively determine that international finance, the Masonic networks and Zionism are openly working in concert to impose on us their unequal vision and domination.

GA:  For a long time I have suggested that there are no hidden conspiracies in the Jewish world – all is done in the open. I strongly suggest that instead of looking for conspiracies under the carpet, we learn to analyze mainstream news. Everything is there and in the open. In fact I argue that the real meaning of Jewish Power is the capacity to silence the discussion of Jewish power. To look for the ‘hidden agenda,’ in that context, is to surrender to Jewish power. We must do the opposite. Look into the work of George Soros, AIPAC, CRIF, CFI, Lord Levy, Wall Street, etc.

Finally what is your reaction to the strategic coalition conducted by Lebanese Hezbollah with Christendom?  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UlXek4xQd381

AS: The utmost respect.

Facing the “clash of civilizations” strategy advocated by the American-Zionists, the transcurrent alliances – Middle-class/Proletariat but also Christians/Muslims – are the only solution. It took years of civil war for the Lebanese to understand this and I just hope we will not have to go that far in this disaster in France, in order to embark on this path of wisdom.

GA: I guess that such an inevitable coalition is what torments the Jewish intelligencia as inspired by the Frankfurt School to operate forcefully against the so -called ‘patriarchal West.’ It is  possible that  true diverse humanism (as oppose to ‘diversity’)  poses the ultimate danger to Jewish cultural narcissistic chauvinism.  In true diverse humanism, we’re all united in our search for the ethical and the universal, we revert to Athenian thinking and oppose the Bernard Henri Levis and the rest of the Jerusalemite cantors.

——-

UKRAINE CRISIS COULD SPARK WORLD WAR THREE by Lasha Darkmoon

http://www.darkmoon.me/2014/ukraine-crisis-could-spark-world-war-three-by-lasha-darkmoon/

Screen Shot 2014-03-05 at 11.27.03 AM

UKRAINE CRISIS COULD SPARK WORLD WAR THREE

by Lasha Darkmoon

Posted on March 5, 2014

As tensions escalate in Ukraine, the world teeters on the brink of a precipice. One false move could plunge it into the abyss…

c7380e9e1f-300x218

Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev gave Ukraine a gift in 1954: Crimea, the strategically important peninsula (shown in pink here) on the northern shores of the Black Sea.

A long and rambling article appeared a few days ago in the online edition of the Daily Telegraph. It was a collage of interesting quotes and curious facts about the current situation in Ukraine. This helped to reinforce my pessimistic belief that man is essentially an irrational animal and that the world, bar one or two exceptions, is largely ruled by serial killers doubling  as politicians.

Indeed, many famous historical characters have managed to combine serial killing with a career in politics. To mention only a few: Nero, Caligula, Countess Bathory of Hungary, Ivan the Terrible, the Borgias, Lavrenti Beria.

This article is itself a collage of quotes and facts from the above-mentioned article, interspersed with my own comments.

Screen Shot 2014-03-05 at 11.55.57 AM

Anders Fogh Rasmussen, the Nato secretary general, has warned that Europe stands on the brink — thanks to Russian intervention in Ukraine. And John Kerry, American secretary of state, has accused Russia of an “incredible act of aggression”.

John McCain, American senator and senior Republican foreign policy spokesman, has spoken about how the US should respond to Putin’s moves.

In an interview with The Daily Beast, he says that Obama’s threats are “laughable” and that Hillary Clinton has totally misjudged Russia.

“Of course she got it wrong,” McCain says, who has seldom been known to get anything right himself.  “She believed that somehow there would be a reset with a guy who was a KGB colonel who always had ambitions to restore the Russian empire. That’s what this is all about.”

One can only wince when one reads such  poppycock.

tyahnybok-300x246

Putin’s entirely justifiable move to come to the rescue of ethnic Russians in the Crimea who have been threatened and even killed in Kiev by neo-Nazi thugs — thugs whom McCain has himself actively supported and met with (see above) — is billed as a bid “to restore the Russian Empire.”

It doesn’t get any wackier than this.

Dmitry Peskov, Putin’s spokesman, was asked what he thought of John Kerry condemning Russia’s “act of aggression” and Russia’s “nineteenth-century behavior.”

“No comment at the moment,” he replied laconically.

Screen Shot 2014-03-05 at 11.55.57 AM

John Kerry has appeared on the Sunday morning political show “Face the Nation,” on CBS.  He said:  “You just don’t in the 21st century behave in 19th century fashion by invading another country on a completely trumped up pretext.”

This from the representative of a country that invaded Iraq on a “trumped up pretext”, and, according to Willian Blum in his classic exposé “Killing Hope”,  has toppled 77 legitimate governments, beginning with the democratically elected government of Iran in 1953. The US moreover is a country that, according to Chomsky, has managed to murder roughly 55 million people since 1945.

“It’s an incredible act of aggression,” Kerry noted hypocritically, laying on the double standards thick.  “It is really a stunning, willful choice by President Putin to invade another country. Russia is in violation of the sovereignty of Ukraine. Russia is in violation of its international obligations.”

Mr Kerry said that the G8 nations and some other countries were “prepared to go to the hilt to isolate Russia.” He threatened trade embargoes, visa bans, asset freezes. Yes, it seems that whenever America starts feeling the pinch and is worried about its huge deficits, it contrives to confiscate the dollar deposits of some other more economically successful country.

A good reason for countries such as China, Russia and Iran to keep their hard-earned savings out of US banks and far from the rapacious claws of Jewish banksters.

Screen Shot 2014-03-05 at 11.55.57 AM

David Remnick, editor of the New Yorker, recently wrote a thought-provoking piece on Ukraine and Putin’s calculations. “Putin’s reaction exceeded our worst expectations,” he huffed. “These next days in Ukraine are bound to be frightening.”

He also quotes former Russian politician Vladimir Ryzhkov who pointed out that  the situation was not only dangerous for Ukraine but for Russia itself: “This will be fatal for the regime and catastrophic for Russia. They have taken leave of their senses!”

Ukraine’s richest man, Rinat Akhmetov, worth $15 billion according to Forbes Magazine, has denounced Russia’s incursion into Ukraine. Russia’s “recourse to force from outside is unacceptable,” he raged.

This Ukrainian oligarch, who has close ties with Ukraine’s Jewish community and is known to be in cahoots  with organized crime — probably the Judeo-Russian mafia — has reason to hate and fear President Putin.

It was Putin, after all, who had brought the seven crooked Russian oligarchs to book, six of them Jewish; and it was also Putin who managed to claw back much of the plundered wealth that these financial predators had filched from the Soviet Union after its dissolution in 1991.

It is men such as this, steeped in corruption, who plot against Putin in occupied Ukraine and hope to make a killing if and when the country is handed over to the tender mercies of the Jew-controlled IMF.

“I call on all citizens to unite for a united and indivisible Ukraine,” Mr Akhmetov cooed unctuously. “We must keep cool heads and not succumb to provocations.”

Yes, Ukraine must at all costs remain united. If part of it is lost to Russia, the richer and stategically more important Crimean region, there’s so much less for oligarchs and Western predators to plunder, isn’t there?

It’s therefore in the interests of billionaire oligarchs like Akhmetov and corrupt politicians like Jewess Yulia Tymoshenko — with her crooked business dealings with Semyon Moglievich, head of the Jewish Russian mafia — that Ukraine’s richer region, the Crimea, should remain within full reach of its future expectant plunderers.

Yulia-Tymoshenko-243x300

YULIA TYMOSHENKO
Close links to the Jewish Russian mafia

It is to be noted that the glamorous Yulia, with her pretty face and sexy hairstyle, has long been the darling of the Western media. Having become Ukraine’s first Prime Minister in January 2005 and Ukraine’s third richest woman, according to Forbes magazine, Yulia subsequently spent time behind bars on serious corruption charges. There are now plans afoot to make this former jailbird Prime Minister of Ukraine again.

To be sure, Julia’s close links to Semyon Moglievich, head of the Jewish Russian mafia, means that Ukraine could indirectly fall into the hands of the world’s most powerful criminal syndicate run by Jews — that is, if Yulia is thrust into power again.

Perhaps that’s just what the West wants.

Screen Shot 2014-03-05 at 11.55.57 AM

Jewish author and self-confessed “Russia-wonk” Ben Judah says that Putin needs to ask himself four key questions as he embarks on a possible conflict in Ukraine.

We have space here only to give Question 1 — which gives us a good idea of Ben Judah’s mindset and Rambo style of writing: “What does Putin plan to tell Russians when their troops start coming home in bodybags?”

It’s now 8am in New York: America is waking up and digesting the news from the past 12 hours.

Here is a good US-focused round up of the events, from the LA Times.

In the days ahead, Rep. Eric Cantor (R-Va.), the majority leader, said “Congress will be looking for ways to help bolster the Ukrainian government’s efforts to stabilize the economy, restore their sovereignty, and promote political reconciliation.”

Like Ben Judah, Eric Cantor is Jewish.

He is the man, passionately Zionist and Islamophobic, who managed to bring down General Petraeus (perceived as anti-Zionist) by gaining mysterious access to the good general’s  private emails. (See here)

Cantor’s story that he got hold of Petraeus’s private love letters to his mistress from a confidential source at the FBI is unconvincing. He probably received this information straight from Israeli intelligence, which, as we all know after Snowden’s revelations, has access — through its cosy and incestuous relationship with the NSA — to every email and telephone call made in America.

One can’t help wondering: how is it that, whenever you take a peep behind the curtains in the secret chamber, you always find a Jew skulking there in the shadows?

Screen Shot 2014-03-05 at 11.55.57 AM

Everyone is hopping mad with Putin for springing to the defense of Russians in Ukraine whose lives have been threatened by neo-Nazi terrorists.

Lithuania has recalled its ambassador from Russia for “consultations”. Canada last night recalled its ambassador to Moscow. The Czech Republic this morning did the same in Prague.

Britain has not recalled its ambassador yet, but last night summoned the Russian ambassador in London to the Foreign Office, presumably to give him a good ticking off. Rail Britannia!

Russia’s upper house also demanded the recall of Russia’s ambassador to the US — something it has not yet done.

Last night Russian warships were spotted off the coast of Crimea, apparently in violation of Russia’s agreement with Ukraine over its Sebastapol base. Russia has controlled that base for 230 years. It is allowed to keep its Black Sea fleet there but it cannot do as it wishes.

Russian forces also took control of the Coast Guard offices in Balaklava — again apparently violating a previous agreement with Ukraine. So argue the Americans and the neo-Nazi terrorists in western Ukraine on the American payroll.

Anders Fogh Rasmussen, Nato secretary general, has convened a meeting of Nato. He has just issued  this angry statement:

“I have convened the North Atlantic Council today because of Russia’s military action in Ukraine and President Putin’s threats against this sovereign nation. What Russia is doing now in Ukraine violates the principles of the United Nations Charter. It threatens peace and security in Europe. Russia must stop its military activities and its threats!”

Oh, so Russia has flouted its agreement with Ukraine, has it?

These noodles conveniently forget that the agreement Russia made was made with a legitimate and democratically elected Ukrainian government. It was not made with a bunch of right-wing fanatics in black masks and jackboots who have just staged a coup d’état.

Sergei Bochenko, commander of a local militia in Savastopol is quoted in a Time Magazine article as saying: “There’s not a chance in hell we’re going to accept the rule of that fascist scum running around in Kiev with swastikas.”

Screen Shot 2014-03-05 at 11.55.57 AM

Arseny Yatsenyuk, interim prime minister of Ukraine, has just said that Russia has declared war on his country. “This is the red alert, this is not just a threat, this is actually a declaration of war!” he fumed.

Acting unelected President Oleksander Turchinov chipped in: “Any attempt to attack military installations in Ukraine is direct military aggression against our country!  The Russian leadership will be held responsible!”

“We are on the brink of disaster!” wailed the unelected prime minister.

Hmm . . . so who initiated the disaster in the first place? Who began it all, hein? Who staged a coup d’état with the help of $5 billion taken out of the pockets of American taxpayers?

Screen Shot 2014-03-05 at 11.55.57 AM

Here is UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon talking on the telephone — with the NSA, Mossad, and Britain’s GCHQ presumably listening in? — saying he was “gravely concerned” by recent events that had compromised Ukrainian sovereignty.

“It is crucial to restore calm and proceed to an immediate de-escalation of the situation,” Ban said, calling on Putin to engage in direct dialogue with the authorities in Kiev. “Cool heads must prevail,“ he added tactlessly, implying that Putin was uncool.

From Ban’s condescending comments one can only conclude that Ban thinks he is in a position to lecture Putin on the niceties of calm behavior. Putin is the hothead, the guy who is going to nuke New York in 45 minutes, as Saddam Hussein was going to nuke London — according to the mendacious war criminal Tony Blair, still at large.

People who meddle in the affairs of sovereign countries, who stage coups d’états and destroy democratically elected governments, these are the cool heads. The good guys. Those who respond to their aggression, like Putin, are depicted as the dangerous lunatics.

The mindboggling hypocrisy beggars belief.

Screen Shot 2014-03-05 at 11.55.57 AM

If a major conflict erupts between Russia and its Western aggressors over Ukraine, I for one will be backing Russia all the way. There’s no doubt in my mind that Russia holds the high moral ground. Backing Russia is therefore incumbent on all of us who value good above evil.

To talk of Russia “annexing” and “occupying” Crimea, as Western political pundits repeatedly do, fails to take into account two crucial facts: (a) that the Crimea once belonged to Russia and was gifted to Ukraine in 1954 by Nikita Khrushchev (see map above), and (b) that a significant majority in Crimea, most of them ethnic Russians, actually requested Putin’s intervention and begged him to come to their rescue.

As for the US and British complaint that Russia had “invaded” Ukraine, one can only roll one’s eyes in dismay at this fatuous accusation, given that it comes from the lips of the hypocritical invaders of Iraq and Afghanistan – failed invaders, one may add, who blew $3 trillion on each invasion and obtained nothing for their pains but ignominy and shame.

It is a mistake to believe that Russia will necessarily confine its military actions to the Crimean region, leaving the rest of Ukraine to slip into the hands of the US and Europe. Why would it be a mistake to think this? For the simple reason that vitally important gas pipelines that pass from Russia to Europe go right through Ukraine.

So make no mistake. The whole of Ukraine, not just Crimea, is Russia’s fief. The US and Europe have no business being in Ukraine all, stirring up trouble and fomenting regime change. If these busybodies continue to meddle in Ukraine’s affairs, Russia would be fully justified in cutting off Europe’s gas supply.

American attorney and online political commentator Michael Snyder sums up the situation in Ukraine neatly:

 ”As an American, how would you feel if another nation funded and organized the violent overthrow of the democratically-elected Canadian government and replaced it with a government that was virulently anti-American?

By doing this to Ukraine, the United States and the EU are essentially sticking a pin in Russia’s eye.  Needless to say, Russia is extremely angry at this point and they are gearing up for war . . .”

Latest: Ukraine “on the brink of disaster

[Editor’s Note: I highly suggest going to the source of this article and reading through the comments from readers. Much in the way of interest there.]

Two Young Canadian Journalists Discuss Zionism’s Negative Effect on Canada and Elsewhere

Screen Shot 2014-02-28 at 9.38.32 PM Click on the link below to listen to the discussion.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sM1Sa_uA_DA&feature=youtu.be

France’s Zionistas in Panic Mode as Nation Rises Up Against Jewish Plutocracy

Zionista Panic Hdr

http://www.vineyardsaker.blogspot.co.uk/

State repression in France only makes the Resistance grow stronger

Dieudonne’s music video and an appeal to French speakers (updated)

Dieudonne and his wife have made a small music video together which Dieudo put at the end of his latest web appearance.  I want to share this video with you:

Screen Shot 2014-02-08 at 11.15.15 PM

CLICK HERE TO VIEW VIDEO

Since Gallier2 has kindly translated the lyrics in a recent comment (merci l’ami!), I will also share that here:

A new wind blows over the planet, wind of renewal, it’s the wind of hope.
the one that makes the branches of the big trees dance, coming out of the night to awaken our souls.
It is born in the heart of the African forest. Dancing, slipping on the shores of the Congo river.
The wind of change, natural revolution, inspired by the stars or inspired by God.
It is here, I feel it, it wipes out my fears and strengthens my arms, it’s the wind of fight
for the emancipation of the black people and the yellows and the whites, for humanity.
A new wind blows over the planet, wind of renewal, it’s the wind of hope.
It opens our eyes and fills our hearts with the light and the faith, it’s the wind of joy.
And the chests are swelling and the fists are closing. Mister President lost his drive.
In the face of the shouting gun, the people gather. It’s him who advances and the king who retreats.
Everywhere the bullets whistle and death is close but I don’t tremble, I’m here standing still.
It’s over, we will live, not retreating, you can kill me and kill my family.
You will not be able to stop this wind, it has awakened us, the sun has risen.
It warms our hearts, make our children smile and turns off our fears, fills us with courage.
It’s the end of the lies, the begin of the march, we will not go back in obscurity…
A new wind blows over the planet, wind of renewal, it’s the wind of hope.
The evil one clings to the branches of his tree, resists stubbornly until losing his senses
No one resists the big wind of faith, either you bow or die Mister Liars
A new wind blows over the planet, wind of renewal, it’s the wind of hope.
Now I’m well, I breathe and I see. I feel and I believe in hope, in life.
The wind is still here, until when? I don’t know. Whatever we will see, it’s here and I believe in it
A new wind blows over the planet, wind of renewal, it’s the wind of hope.
A new wind blows over the planet, wind of renewal, it’s the wind of hope.

Lastly, I have also extracted the mp3 music track from the video and uploaded it to Mediafire to share it with you.  You can get that track here:

https://www.mediafire.com/?3ku4eihiu6afkp3

One more thing for the French speakers here – Alain Soral has recently released an absolutely amazing video about his latest public appearance.  Check it out here:

http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x1abt94_conference-d-alain-soral-a-marseille-vers-l-insoumission-generalisee_news

I will be honest here – I cannot do that myself simply because of a lack of time.  But guys, if somebody could translate and subtitle his speech that would be an ideal way to make Soral better known to the English speaking world.  So if anybody of you could do it, please do and then upload the video somewhere and let me know and, of course, also let the folks at E&R know (email me if you need their email address).

As for me, I will write another post about Dieudo and Soral in the very near future.  Stay tuned.

Kind regards,

The Saker

‘”THE FRENCH ARE BUBBLING WITH RAGE!!!!”

Last November I wrote a piece entitled “Is a new revolution quietly brewing in France?” in which I described the struggle which was taking place between the French people and the Zionist plutocracy which has ruled France over the past decades (roughly since 1969) and today I am returning to this topic as events have rapidly accelerated and taken a sharp turn for the worse.  A number of most interesting things have happened and the French “Resistance” (I will use this collective designator when speaking of the entire Dieudonne/Soral movement) is now being attacked on three levels.

Intellectual level:

This is, by far, the most interesting “counter-attack”.  A well-known French commentator, Eric Naulleau, agreed to a “written debate” with Alain Soral in which both sides would discuss their differences and the transcript would be published in a book entitled “Dialogues Désaccordés” (which can roughly be translated as “detuned dialogs” or “dialogs out of tune” or even “disagreeing dialogs”).  To explain the importance of this publication I have to say a few words about Naulleau himself.

Screen Shot 2014-02-08 at 11.31.21 PM

Eric Naulleau

Everybody in France knows Eric Naulleau as one of the two partners of a “journalistic tag team” called “Naulleau and Zemmour” in which one of the partners – Eric Naulleau – is a Left-leaning progressive and the other – Eric Zemmour – is a Right-leaning conservative.  Together they form a formidable and, sometimes, feared team of very sharp and outspoken critics and commentators which was featured on various shows on French TV.  Zemmour, in particular, is an extremely intelligent and very charming person whose wonderful sense of humor combined with an outspoken attitude often got him in trouble.  He is one of the few French Jews who actually got sued by the notorious LICRA (rabid Zionist organization formed by Trotskyists to attack those opposing them) for daring to say “French people with an immigrant background were profiled because most traffickers are blacks and Arabs… it’s a fact” on TV.  Together, Naulleaua and Zemmour are known for being formidable debaters and very tough and even blunt critics who can take on pretty much anybody.

Naulleau explained that, according to him, it made no sense at all to ban Soral from the mass media because that still gave the option for Soral to record his show on the Internet where they would be viewed by millions of people (that is not an exaggeration, by the way, Soral’s videos do score more views that some national TV channels!).  Naulleau explained that in his videos Soral was always alone, free to say whatever he wanted, without anybody contradicting or challenging him and that his goal was precisely that – to unmask, challenge and defeat Soral in an open debate in which he would show all the fallacies and mistakes of Soral’s theses.  To say that Naulleau failed in his goal would be an understatement.  Soral absolutely crushed every single one of Naulleau’s arguments to the point where I personally felt sorry for Naulleau (whom I like a lot as a person).  Worse, not only did Soral absolutely obliterate Naulleau, he also made a prediction and said: “you will see the shitstorm which will hit you for agreeing to make this book with me!”.  And that is the crux of the disagreement between Soral and Naulleau: do the Zionists control the French media yes or not? Can they blacklist somebody or not?  Is there a shadow “Zionist censorship” in France or is public speech still free?  Soral’s thesis is that France is in the iron grip of a “behind the scenes” Zionist mafia which is exactly Naulleau vehemently denies.  The problem for Naulleau is that he proved Soral to be right.

The French media immediately attacked Naulleau for “providing Soral with a platform to spew his hateful theories” to which Naulleu logically replied that Soral was already doing so on the Internet and that, besides, he – Naulleau – did not believe in censorship but in a strong and free debate.  Naulleau also got attacked for not saying this or not saying that – in reality for getting so totally defeated by Soral in the debate. The book, by the way, became an instant bestseller which, indeed, made it possible for even more French people to think through Soral’s arguments and make up their own mind.  So, ironically, and even though Naulleau clearly wanted to challenge Soral, he did him a huge favor by allowing him to break the media blockade around his name – Soral is never ever invited on a talkshow – and by allowing the ideas of Soral to come right back into the public debate via this book, Naulleau de facto helped Soral.  Some have even speculated that Naulleau might be a secret sympathizer of Soral and that he did all of this deliberately.  I don’t believe that at all – Naulleau is sincere, and Naulleau is also naive: he is now only slowly coming to grips with the fact that Soral’s core thesis – that the Zionists completely control the French media – is a fact and that Soral’s prediction about Naulleau getting in trouble for this book was spot on.  Right now, Naulleau and his friend Zemmour still have a show on a small local TV station, but clearly Naulleau has now deeply alienated the French plutocracy.  As far as I know, nobody has dared to speak in Naulleau’s defense.  The funniest thing of all is that even though both Soral and Naulleau are officially coauthors of this book and even though Naulleau attempts to deny that Soral is blacklisted, only Naulleau got interviewed on the French talk shows, never Soral.  Not once.  What better way could there be to prove Soral right?

“Personalities lynch mob” level:

While Naulleau was trying to defend himself against attacks from all sides for daring to coauthor a book with Soral, something absolutely unprecedented took place: day after day after day, media personalities were shown on TV trashing Dieudonne and his “quenelle” gesture.  This really looked like a “virtual lynching” or a Stalinist trial – politicians, journalists, comedians, commentators, actors – you name it – all took turns to ridicule, insult, denounce and otherwise express their hatred for Dieudonne.  This truly became an Orwellian “two minutes of hate” in which Dieudonne was designated as the target of an absolutely vicious hate campaign.

Screen Shot 2014-02-08 at 11.32.08 PM

Bedos as “Dieudo Hitler Bin Laden”

A mediocre comedian named Nicolas Bedos was even given 12 minutes of uninterrupted air time to compare Dieudonne to both Hitler and Osama Bin Laden and his shows to a Gestapo interrogation room.  It was surreal, really.  If an extraterrestrial had just tuned in and watch this display of vicious hatred he would have imagined that Dieudonne was a 2nd Hitler about to invade France with a huge army of bloodthirsty Nazis.  For me, it was clear that the reason why all these different personalities were standing in line for the chance to outdo each other in taking a shot at Dieudonne was to prove their loyalty to the Zionist “deep-state”.  This was as transparent as it was sickening.  And again, it proved that Soral was right and that, if anything, he was under-estimating the degree of control of the Zionist plutocracy over France.

State level:

Finally, from being more or less covert, the persecution of Dieudonne and Soral by the French state became completely overt.  I already mentioned how in early January the French Minister of the Interior, Manuel Valls, used his powers to ban the latest show of Dieudonne (see here and here).  Over the last weeks, this repression has reached a new level with even more lawsuits against Soral (12 simultaneous lawsuits, see Google-translated list here) and administrative harassments (evening “visits” by bailiffs, abusive arrests, threats, police search of his small theatre in Paris) against Dieudonne.  All these events taken together – and it is really not hard at all to connect the dots – for a very clear picture: the power of the state is used to persecute, harass and repress Dieudonne and Soral.  And that, of course, just goes even further in proving that Soral is right in his central thesis about France being run by a shadow occupation “deep government” whose loyalties are not to the French people, but to the Zionist plutocracy and Israel.

The reaction against this state of affairs is also becoming stronger and the amount of people supporting Dieudonne and Soral has literally skyrocketed.  The reason for that is not only that a lot of French people share the same views as Soral and Dieudonne, but also a deep running French cultural tradition of admiring rebels and disliking the state.  Add to this that Hollande is the most hated President in French history and that the French economy is doing down the tubes triggering untold suffering and rage in the people suffering from the crisis, and you get a very explosive mix: the so-called “Day of Rage”.

Check out these videos before they are removed form YouTube (like this one):

Screen Shot 2014-02-08 at 11.14.10 PM

CLICK HERE TO WATCH VIDEO

 

Screen Shot 2014-02-08 at 11.14.25 PM

CLICK HERE TO WATCH VIDEO

 

Screen Shot 2014-02-08 at 10.52.45 PM

CLICK HERE TO WATCH VIDEO

 

Anybody who knows France well will tell you that this is very serious stuff because unlike other demonstrations which typically oppose a law, or a policy or a specific event, these demonstrators clearly are rejecting the legitimacy of the entire political system: they want regime change.  So far, the French media has tried to minimize the coverage of this event and the French elites are trying hard to pretend like this is some small, fringe, extremist group, which is utter nonsense.  France is bubbling with rage.

Zionist panic:

The Zionists are actually aware of that, and they are now in the panic mode.  Just take a look at the headlines of this Israeli-French website:

JSSnews-Dieudo-panic

 

On the top right, you can see the Israeli founder of this website – Jonathan-Simon Sellem and on the top left you see Arno Klarsfeld, a well-known “French” (Israeli/German/French) lawyer and rabid Zionist.  Here is what they are quoted saying:

Jonathan-Simon Sellem: “Dieudonne, you will never be a martyr.  You will not a hero.  Your name will be cursed in history, by history”.

Arno Klarsfeld: “They is a crucial moment in history: Jews are already beginning to leave France”.

Clearly, these two gentlemen see Dieudonne as some modern mix of Agag, Hamman, Titus, Hitler and Bin Laden – a terrifying, bloodthirsty and infinitely dangerous and evil man who threatens the survival of the Jewish race (never mind that Jews are not a race).

Could that be a little bit of an over-reaction?

What are these folks so terrified of?

I think that the answer is obvious: what they are so terrified of is not that Dieudonne and Soral will reopen Auschwitz somewhere near Paris, or that French Jews will be expelled from France.  They know that this is paranoia (which Gilad Atzmon calls “Pre-Traumatic Street Disorder”) is absolute crap: French Jews are safe, happy and welcome in France and nobody is seriously out there to do them any harm.  No, what this small clique of  Zionist Jews (representing a tiny fraction of the much more diverse French Jewry) really fears is that the truth about them and their power over the French deep-state will come out.  And this is not only about Jews.  There is a non-Jewish plutocracy formed around the Jewish core of French bankers and financiers which is also completely in bed with the Zionists and whose future depends on maintaining the Zionist control over France: politicians, of course, but also actors, journalists, academics, etc. – a full constellation of Shabbos Goyim willing to do Israel’s Sayanim’s dirty job for them.  It is this entire elite and the system which it built which is threatened by Soral and Dieudonne and by what the movement “Equality and Reconciliation” stands for: a union of all the French people (native or immigrants) which together are determined to resist the Zionist oppression of France and who, just as in WWII, will resist the occupier until the Liberation.

When and how could such a “Liberation” occur?

I don’t know.  These events are very complex and multi-dimensional and it is, I believe, impossible to predict what could happen.  What I am sure of, is that this movement, this Resistance, will not be crushed, nor will it somehow magically disappear.  To paraphrase the Communist Manifesto, the French people “have nothing to lose but their chains”: their country is ruined and they are ruled by an evil foreign occupier.  In terms of dynamics, every move which is made against Soral and Dieudonne only makes things worse for the occupation regime – the harder the strike, the harder the blowback.  The legitimacy of the regime, in particular, is greatly affected by such absolutely ridiculous actions like the “overkill” of a Minister of Internal Affairs using the highest court in the country (the State Council) in an emergency session to ban a single comedian’s stand up show.

Sure, for the time being most people in France comply, obey, or look the other way.  But everybody know, everybody understands and very few believe in the official lies, especially in the younger generation.

This all reminds me of the Soviet Union of the 1980s where externally nothing much was happening and where the system itself look ugly but safe.  Russians were making anti-Brezhnev jokes at private parties while the KGB from time to time arrested dissidents.  But nobody – not even the KGB officers – had any respect for the system, the regime, the official ideology and its propaganda.  Everybody did what they were told, but nobody believed in what they were doing.  That is the exact situation not only for the French cops who are constantly used to ban, harass and arrest Dieudo and his supporters, but also of an increasing percentage of the general public.

Right now the pressure on the dam is getting stronger and stronger, and the cracks more and more visible.  So far, the elites have had enough fingers to stick into the cracks, but this is clearly a futile attempt to delay the inevitable.  And when the French dam will burst, it will impact not only France, but also a good segment of western Europe.  So while the pro-US Ukrainian nationalists want to subordinate their country to the EU, the EU is threatened with an inevitable and violent explosion.  But, like on the sinking Titanic, the media’s “orchestra” will be playing its music until the last second.

The Saker

The French Palestinian Solidarity Deserves a Quenelle! by Ariadna Theokopoulos

http://www.boldfacenews.com/french-palestinian-solidarity-fights-anti-semitism/BOLDface News logo

Wednesday, January 8, 2014

By

Ariadna Theokopoulos

France is the middle of a sweeping popular movement sparked by Dieudonné and symbolized by la Quennelle, a movement that has united young and old, white and black, men and women, the middle class and the unemployed, extreme Left, center and Right, Christians and Muslims and even a few Jews.

It is an anti-establishment revolt but also one specifically directed at the Jewish power that rules the French establishment and has destroyed individual freedoms long cherished by the French, like freedom of speech. The French appear to have had enough of forced indoctrination into the worship of the Holocaust (a topic Dieudonné has dared to ridicule in his comedy sketches), of laws throwing historians in prison for daring to question the official Holocaust narrative, of the foreign policy of France being conducted according to the dictates of CRIF (the French equivalent of AIPAC).

It is a peaceful revolt, employing a gesture, not words, in a state muzzled by anti-free speech laws, one that mocks Power and says, “We are no longer afraid of you.” It is precisely that message that has sent the French Israeli Firsters into a hysterical panic: that “they” are no longer afraid and that a single spark was sufficient to unite all segments of society that JP had worked for so long to atomize and set against each other.

The measure of their panic is given by the preposterous, Orwellian ways in which they propose to silence and punish Dieudonné. The French Interior Minister, Mon. Valls (the same one who declared that through his wife he is eternally tied to Israel) has instructed (he prefers the word “advised”) the mayors of all French towns to forbid any performances of Dieudonné anywhere, in any venue. “You will never work in this country again!” Another contemplated measure is to form a joint commission of no less than three ministeries: Interior, Justice and Economy, to find modalities of punishing Dieudonné in all possible ways: depriving him of liberty, ruining him finnacially. He already owes close to 100,00 Euros in fines for offending speech.

Now in the middle of all this popular revolt, a progressive voice that despite its French accent sounds so very familiar, speaks out… against Dieudonné! It is Jean-Claude LeFort, President of the Association France Palestine Solidarité (AFPS):

“Pour qui­conque suit objec­ti­vement les faits, les gestes et les propos de Dieu­donné, la chose ne peut prêter à aucun doute pos­sible : son anti­sé­mi­tisme est patent. Il n’est pas accep­table. Le racisme, redisons-??le avec force, n’est pas une opinion mais un délit. Nous le condamnons par principe, absolu et non dis­cu­table, mais aussi par nécessité poli­tique : il nuit ter­ri­blement à la cause du peuple pales­tinien dont Dieu­donné fait mine de se réclamer.

Ses propos ont été condamnés par la justice à de nom­breuses reprises. Et la loi doit s’appliquer sans la moindre mansuétude.”

French is a beautiful language but abject groveling sounds as foul as it does in English.

In free translation, with emphasis added:

“To those who follow events objectively, the gestures and statements of Dieudonné leave no doubt: they are patently anti-semitic. It is unacceptable. Racism, let is restate it strongly, is not an opinion but a felony. We condemn it by principle, absolute and undebatable, but also by political necessity: it harms terribly the cause of the Palestinian people which Dieudonné claims to support.”
His statements have been condemned by judicial authorities many times. And the law must be applied in full force.”

Not making the “fight against anti-semitism” a priority of the Palestinian solidarity, I am sure, would “harm terribly the cause” of their funding. Who’s your daddy, Jean-Claude?
AFPS, like their English-speaking brethren “give no quarter” to “anti-semites,”  and they support punishing them “sans la moindre mansuétude!

AFPS, this quennelle is for you:

th

—–

source: http://www.boldfacenews.com/french-palestinian-solidarity-fights-anti-semitism/

Freedom of Speech and Radical Press need your help!

DonationAd

RadEditorAT copy 2

Dear Radical Readers and Supporters of Free Speech,

There’s nothing more onerous for me than having to send out appeals for help to cover the costs of running my news site, keeping the lights on, the telephone working (literally!) and some food on the table while putting in countless hours of legal work in order to defend myself against two very serious attacks upon both my person, my family and my website (1. a still-standing sec. 13(1) Canadian Human Rights Commission “hate crime” and 2. a sec. 319(2) Criminal Code of Canada “hate crime”), both brought on by the masonic Jewish lobby group B’nai Brith Canada and aided and abetted by a colluding “mainstream” (aka zionist Jew) controlled media.

The ongoing battle for Canadians to retain their (and our) Charter rights to freedom of speech and expression on the Internet just recently took another heavy hit from the Bolshevik zionist commie commissars here in Canada with the recent ruling in the (yes, you guessed it) Ricardo Warmouse v Fourniers and John Does [FreeDominion.ca] libel and defamation case in Ontario where, once again, the defendants in this lugubrious libel suit were prevented from presenting critical evidence by a judge who obviously is in the pay of these pernicious and persecuting plutocrats who wield such incredibly heinous influence over our judiciary, be it federal or provincial.

What! You haven’t heard about this case in the Post Media News Network? No front page coverage in the National Zionist Post? No blabbering, blathering, brainless ranting gushing forth from that mouthy little zionist Fraser Institute freak who’s always yapping his face off on the Sun News Network harping about “neo-Nazis” and “anti-Semites” and “hate mongers” and “Mooslims” and “Injuns”?  Well, maybe you should take a serious look at what’s gone down in the free speech battleground lately. It will have some very serious negative effects upon how we express ourselves on the net, if, in fact, we’ll even be given the opportunity to comment on events of a political nature any longer. Now that poking fun at politicians and media personalities or anyone for that matter has crossed over into the sinister, convoluted world of “hate & contempt” (another zionist Jew shapeshifting feat), chances are you’ll not be permitted to comment anywhere on news sites or blogs for fear of the Bolshevik cheka kicking down your door or the website owner’s door and charging either of you with a “hate crime” or a libel and defamation suit.

Meanwhile the loathsome lizards who are bound and determined to cut the metaphoric tongue out of your mouth and silence you forever are creaming their jeans knowing that their NWO commie agenda just took another lurch forward here in Canada and that 95% of Canadians are still unaware of what went down in that Ottawa courtroom and that their rights and freedoms just lost a sizeable number of points in the free speech marketplace.

From all appearances Canada’s libel and defamation laws have now been co-opted by the zionist forces, providing a field day for further and endless civil litigation cases. Why it’s a Jewish lawyer’s dream come true! But, as Samuel Roth, a 1930s Jewish author once said in the title of his book, “Jews Must Live” too.

Roth-JewsMustLive 600

If Mark and Connie Fournier, owners of the Free Dominion.ca blogger forum, decide not to appeal this ruling and challenge the overtly treasonous behaviour of the judge who stood in the way of justice then we’re in for a rough ride ahead. It will mean another forum succumbs to the Orwellian control freaks and Canadians are left bereft of their fundamental right to self-expression.

Of course these same deluded and dangerous traitors to Canadian democracy also have their sights set on RadicalPress.com for it’s another beacon of free speech and a citadel of common sense yet to be assailed and silenced in the name of Zion and the New World Order agenda for global totalitarianism. That, in a nutshell, is what the sec. 319(2) charge against me is all about.

Somehow these scheming sons of Satan want to implant their demented, psychopathic agenda for absolute control of freedom of speech into this last remaining federal “hate crime” piece of legislation so that no one will ever dare expose or criticize their brutal regime in Palestine that’s genociding the indigenous populations throughout the Middle East for fear of either imprisonment or hefty fines or both.

This is what I’m up against and it takes time and energy to prepare for the battle ahead. I’m still without a lawyer and I’m not entering that ring for fame and fortune but I have to stand up for what I believe is my God given right as a human being to express my opinions and call to task those who are destroying my country from within. I only hope that other concerned Canadians will stand with me in the days ahead. United we can stop this madness and shift our nation back into its former shape where decency, honesty and fair play will once again hold meaning and hope for us.

If you’re broke like me I would ask that you at least try to pass this message on to others. There’s a PayPal button on the top right hand corner of my website and for further methods of assisting me please click on the link below.

Thanks once again for any help you may be able to offer,

Sincerely

Arthur Topham
Publisher & Editor
The Radical Press
Canada’s Radical News Network
“Digging to the root of the issues since 1998”

======

The battle to retain our inherent right to freedom of speech, both off and on the net, comes with great cost to those on the front lines. Please consider a donation to the Radical Press Free Speech Defence Fund.

MASS SURVEILLANCE IN THE ORWELLIAN POLICE STATE. Part 2: The Red Terror to Come, by Dr Lasha Darkmoon

Screen Shot 2013-07-22 at 11.32.03 AM

“National security is a euphemism for Jewish rule.”
— JB Campbell, G-2

PART 1: WHAT BIG BROTHER WANTS

The National Security Agency’s 1-million–square-foot, $2 billion headquarters is located in Utah in a valley just south of Salt Lake City. The Utah Data Center is to be the headquarters and epicenter of terrestrial surveillance: here trillions of millions of intercepted phone calls, emails, and data trails will be collected and scrutinized by analysts over highly encrypted fiber-optic links.

A project of immense secrecy, the Utah’s Data Center’s purpose, according to bestselling author and investigative journalist James Bamford, will be this:

. . . to intercept, decipher, analyze, and store vast swaths of the world’s communications as they zap down from satellites and zip through the  underground and undersea cables of international, foreign, and domestic networks…. Flowing through its servers and routers and stored in near-bottomless databases will be all forms of communication, including the complete contents of private emails, cell phone calls, and Google searches, as well as all sorts of personal data trails…. Should the agency ever fill the Utah center with a yottabyte of information, it would be equal to about 500 quintillion (500,000,000,000,000,000,000) pages of text.

—  James Bamford, author of The Shadow Factory: The Ultra-Secret NSA from 9/11 to the Eavesdropping on America. (See here)

According to Google’s former CEO, Eric Schmidt, the sum total of all human knowledge from the dawn of history up to 2003 comes to 5 exabytes. Our own calculations allow us to infer the following from this: given that one million exabytes equals one yottabyte or 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 bytes (1024), one yottabyte of information would equal the sum total of all extraterrestrial knowledge on 200,000 planets identical to planet earth from their earliest times up to now.

To put it another way: 5 exabytes is equal to all the words ever spoken by mankind, while one yottabyte of information would take 11 trillion years to download from the internet using high-power broadband.

The mind boggles at the thought of such infinite oceans of knowledge, all of it theoretically recordable on a supercomputer.

•••

According to Ray Kurtzweil, American futurologist described by Forbes magazine as “the ultimate thinking machine”, the next few decades will bring about an exponential growth in computing power.

IBM is at present trying to simulate the human brain with its own cutting-edge supercomputer called Blue Gene. What is Blue Gene’s brain capacity? You will be surprised to hear it’s a mere fraction of the human brain. It possesses only a billion neurons in comparison to the brain’s 20 billion. As for the connection between neurons known as synapses, it possesses 10 trillion of these compared to the human brain’s 200 trillion. For all its sophistication, the Blue Gene “supercomputer” possesses only 4.5 percent of the human brain’s capacity. (See here)

Whoever made the human brain was clearly a super-intelligent Being of some kind—unless you prefer to think that this incredibly complex organ came about by chance after a remarkable series of accidents starting with the Big Bang 13.8 billion years ago.

According to Kurtzweil, the human brain is about to be overtaken by computers. By 2045, he predicts, Singularity will occur—a merger between biology and technology. He says, “There will be no distinction, post-Singularity, between human and machine.” An ordinary computer in 2045 will possess one billion times more power than all human brains combined today.

Finally, by 2099, humans and computers will have merged. Literally, in every sense. By turning himself into a self-replicating machine, man will have achieved immortality.

Thus Kurtzweil, a man known for his uncannily accurate predictions.

In such a Brave New World, there can be no secrets. Big Brother will not only know what you are doing, he will know what you are thinking. He will know what you are going to do before you even do it.

Screen Shot 2013-07-22 at 11.35.57 AM

Obviously the only way to find the vitally important information is to filter though the vast repository of irrelevant trash. This is done through a process known as massive volume reduction (MVR).  The spooks say they are interested primarily in “metadata”, not in content. They only want to know your secrets if they are worth knowing. Your metadata basically tells them if you are a suitable candidate for more intrusive surveillance.

The information gathering process is facilitated by the use of “selectors”. These are key words or phrases. If you use these regularly, you automatically make yourself suspect. Search terms include subject headings, phone numbers, and email addresses of interest. There are roughly 30,000-40,000 selector terms.

According to whistleblower William Binney, there is a target list in the US of 500,000 to a million people. These are the ones being watched. Investigative journalist Christopher Ketchum thinks this figure too low. A reliable source told him that the number of potential terrorists in America was much higher. “Eight  million Americans are now listed in Main Core as potentially suspect,” Ketchum reported. “In the event of a national emergency, these people could be subject to everything from heightened surveillance and tracking to direct questioning and possibly even detention.”

The idea that we are all being spied on in a responsible way, and that we have nothing to fear unless we are terrorists, will not bear scrutiny for a number of reasons. The famous Latin tag Quis custodes custodiet?—Who will watch the watchers?—says it all. We are referring here to Israeli infiltration. The fact that everything known to the NSA and GCHQ is also known to Israeli intelligence, through Israeli internet giants such as Verint and Narus, is a cause for extreme concern.

For more on this subject, read Christopher Bollyn’s “How Israel Spies on Us All through the NSA”.

This is the problem then: not only does Big Brother in America know all your secrets, so does Big Brother in Israel.

•••

Apart from Jonathan Pollard, a long list of American Jews have spied for Israel. Surprisingly, none of these Jews have been prosecuted and punished. Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Perle, Steven Bryen, Douglas Feith, Michael Ledeen, Steven Rosen, Keith Weissman, Jane Harman—the list goes on—have never been brought to justice. They cannot be indicted, no matter what crimes they commit, because they are beyond the law. The law applies only to ordinary citizens—to you and me. The ruling elite, now disproportionately Jewish, remains untouchable.

James Petras puts it like this:

Because of the power and influence of the Presidents of the 52 Major American Jewish organizations, Justice Department officials have ORDERED DOZENS OF ISRAELI ESPIONAGE CASES TO BE DROPPED. Israel is a key overseas ally of the National Security Agency, as has been documented in the Israeli press (Haaretz, June 8, 2013). Two Israeli high tech firms, Verint and Narus, WITH TIES TO THE ISRAELI SECRET POLICE (Mossad), have provided the spy software for the NSA. And this, of course, has opened a window for Israeli spying in the US against Americans opposed to the Zionist state. (See here, emphasis added)

So here we have two Israeli companies, Verint and Narus, with unlimited access to the private data of the entire population of America. Verint taps the communication lines at Verizon. Narus does the same at AT&T. And both companies, we learn, “have extensive ties to Israel, a country with a long and aggressive history of spying on the US.

It doesn’t take a genius to connect the dots.

That the state of Israel has access to all the electronic communications of Americans—and yes, of Europeans too—would not be of undue concern if Israel had a good reputation and if Mossad agents were known to behave in a responsible manner. Unfortunately, Israel’s past behavior does not inspire confidence, and most people would sooner trust an angry rattlesnake than a Mossad agent. There are rogue elements in Mossad, moreover, that are known to have close links to organized crime in Israel, i.e., to the Judeo-Russian mafia. (See here, here and here). There are also rogue elements in the NSA and in the Israeli internet companies, Verint and Narus, which have a back door (as we have shown) into all NSA information.

We are told of Paul Jacobson who worked for the NSA:

Paul lost his security clearance. He did crazy stuff… they thought he was unstable… [NSA] employees referred to him as “weird”…  he “acted like a robot”… was mentally and emotionally unstable… he also began changing his name, first to Jimmy Carter and later to Alfred Olympus von Ronsdorf!!! (Quoted here)

Eventually Jacobson was sacked. He was too much of a liability. How can the world be safe, it needs to be asked, if its secrets are allowed to fall into the hands of loose cannons and kooks like Jacobson?

•••

Then there is Jacob “Kobi” Alexander, a former Israeli intelligence officer who founded Verint that monitors all the telephone calls at Verizon. He is now a fugitive from justice.

Screen Shot 2013-07-22 at 11.36.34 AM

Former head of Comverse, parent company of Verint, Kobi Alexander is now a wanted man who fled US justice to Africa and is reportedly now hiding out in Israel. “It is important to note,” Christopher Bollyn writes, “that Kobi Alexander and Comverse were closely connected to Odigo, the Israeli messaging service that was used to warn Israelis to stay away from the Word Trade Center on 9-11.”

Wanted by the FBI on three dozen charges of fraud, theft, lying, bribery, money laundering and other crimes, Kobi Alexander is a typical example of the type of Israeli Jew who can echo the infamous words that  Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu made to Jonathan Pollard on exiting Pollard’s cell after a prison visit, “Once we squeeze all we can out of the United States, it can dry up and blow away.”

It comes as no surprise to learn that two of Tobi Alexander’s top associates at Comverse, Chief Financial Officer David Kreinberg and former General Counsel William F. Sorin, were charged with similar crimes. Both pleaded guilty and are now behind bars.

These then are mad, bad, and dangerous operatives who have access to the private details of millions of people not only in America but all over the world. You might as well hand over your national security to the Jewish mafia. The Judeo-Russian mafia, as this writer has already taken pains to point out elsewhere, is by far the most dangerous criminal organization in the world today. It has five million members in America right now, many of them illegal immigrants and specialists in extortion and blackmail.

•••

There’s a whiff of doom in the air nowadays: killer vaccines, chemtrails, fluoride poisoning, GMOs, EMFs, Monsanto Frankenfoods, Fukushima radiation, the Israelification of airports and the police — all accompanied by unprecedented police brutality.

What is even more ominous is the knowledge that the DHS has acquired 1.6 billion rounds of hollow-point bullets for use against American citizens: enough to sustain a hot war in America for 20-plus years.

Over 2,700 giant, armor-plated vehicles, totally impenetrable to civilian defensive weapons, have been prepared for use in American cities. If this isn’t frightening enough, tens of thousands of burial vaults or thermoplastic graveliners, each for the reception of a cheap plastic coffin, have been moved into an enormous storage depot in Georgia where they now await their future occupants.

Today we learned to our astonishment that Homeland Security has been training secret assassination squads for the summary execution, without trial, of anyone in America that this criminal regime wants to get rid of: top politicians, legislators, academics, whistleblowers, patriots and political dissidents.

VT political columnist Preston James asks: “Is DHS now morphing into a new Bolshevik style Cheka, preparing to deploy mass murder and Red Terror in America?”

Few Americans have heard of the Red Terror. If they have, they probably think that those distant events, which claimed the lives of 66 million people in the Soviet Union between 1917 and 1953, are unlikely to occur again.

They could be in for a big shock.

•••

It looks like the American Titanic is about to hit the iceberg.

The Captain and his crew, wreathed in smiles as they stand on the deck of the doomed ship, appear to be unaware of the approaching catastrophe. As for the passengers on board the ship, these catatonic and mesmerized masses are all  locked into a state of collective psychoparalysis that does not bode well for the future. Like sleepwalkers in a mist, they face a rude awakening.

Here are some of things we can expect to see happening soon, for history tends to repeat itself with an unnerving frequency. These quotes are a collage plucked from multiple sources. Google any phrase and it will take you to the relevant source. Other primary sources are listed below.

My mother tried to save me by offering herself…I was only skin and bone, just 14. To no avail.  She got a rifle butt in her face….Before our eyes they picked on the very young first, on toddlers, the younger the better….They shot a mother stone dead, riddled her with bullets, for trying to defend her 10-year-old daughter like a tigress. “Frau komm,” was the cry, every woman and every young child dragged into a dark corner and raped on the spot….On and on it went all night, the raping did not stop….it was a scene out of damnation, out of Dante’s Inferno, but much, much worse….They would beat us, spit on us, even piss on us….

Even nuns in habits were raped….182 Catholic nuns were raped by Red Army soldiers in the diocese of Kattowitz, the soldiers left behind 66 pregnant nuns.  Some women lived for weeks on rooftops trying to escape the violence….

The Russians had gone as far as actually to crucify nearly all the villagers whilst still alive, nailing a number of women and even babies to barn doors…. Every room contained bodies, the corpses of children and of women who had evidently suffered serial rape before their deaths….women who had been raped and mutilated one by one, each with an empty wine bottle in her vagina….

Now two Poles came in, dressed only in their trousers, and the girls cried out at their sight. They quickly grabbed the first of the girls, and bent her backwards over the edge of the table until her joints cracked. I was close to passing out as one of them took his knife and, before the very eyes of the other girls, cut off her right breast. He paused for a moment, then cut off the other side. I have never heard anyone scream as desperately as that girl. After this operation he drove his knife into her abdomen several times, which again was accompanied by the cheers of the Russians….

The Commissar [officer in charge, almost certainly Jewish] made sure I was watching. One girl had not undressed completely…around seventeen years of age. They soaked her bra with oil and set it on fire, and while she screamed, a thin iron rod was shoved into her vagina…

( 1 23456 7 8 910 )

It all happened. And it is likely to happen again soon. If there’s one thing we have learned from history, it is this:  most of the terrible things done in the past, from the French Revolution to the Russian Revolution and from World War I to World War II,  were done by non-Jews — with Jews in the background pulling the strings. Indeed, no Jewish rule would be possible but for the enthusiastic collaboration of the goyim.

•••

A government that spies on its own citizens so obsessively and pathologically, to the extent that it needs to record every single telephone call and email, does not inspire confidence. It cannot by any definition be called a democratic government, for no government could possibly obtain the willing consent of its citizens to the total destruction of their privacy. Even the spies cannot be happy about being spied upon.

No consent, no democracy.

JB Campbell notes in his latest essay: “The CIA, FBI, Secret Service, FEMA, DHS, IRS … all of these agencies are dedicated to our being rounded up and put in prison camps or psychiatric prisons.” And he adds, in a memorable phrase I have already quoted above, “National security is a euphemism for Jewish rule.

Paranoia? I don’t think so. From mass surveillance to mass murder is one small step. It will come. We now live in a neo-Bolshevik police state which will soon be engaged in the systematic slaughter of its own citizens.

Screen Shot 2013-07-22 at 11.37.00 AM

There is nothing new under the sun. What has been, will be again. The same Bolshevik beasts who once ran amok in war-torn Russia and Germany have been reincarnated in America and now await their hour of satanic bloodlust.

Never forget: the same criminal cabal behind the coldblooded murder of 3000 American citizens on 9-11 is in power today. Not a day goes by but their robotic drone “warriors” slaughter innocent civilians, mostly women and children, in Afghanistan and Pakistan. They tortured the innocent at Abu Ghraib. They continue to do so at Guantanamo. Right now they are beating the war drums for the mass murder of the Iranians, a people guiltless of any crimes, and all this for the greater glory of Israel.

Like Stalin and his criminal cohorts, many of them non-Jews like the rapist killer Beria, these psychopaths will soon turn their attention to the American homeland. Killing is their raison d’être and torture their favorite sport. It won’t be long now before they cast their baleful eyes on their own people, in preparation for a blood sacrifice to Moloch.

Get ready for the gore and the gulags. Prepare for a new Red terror in the killing fields to come.

_____________________________________________________________

Dr Lasha Darkmoon is an academic with higher degrees in Classics. She is also a poet and translator. Her articles have been published here and here; her poems, translations and various other pieces here.

On Jewish Influence by Henry Ford, Sr.

Henry Ford Sr.