Canadian Author Frank Raymond Speaks to the Truth & Justice for Germans Society Video by Brian Ruhe

Canadian Author Frank Raymond Speaks to the Truth & Justice for Germans Society 

Video by Brian Ruhe

August 27th, 2016

Frank Raymond

Youtube link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RzZMJD5vR7M

Frank Raymond is the author of the politically incorrect thriller “Sweet Dreams and Terror Cells,” available from Amazon.com and all Amazon outlets. It is a fictional story of a few individuals and families who get caught up in the struggle against the New World Order, and confront the Order’s drive to genocide and replace the white peoples of the world by mass ‘immigration,’ mongrelization, low birth rates and — above all — mind control. Many read it for the entertainment, mystery and literature. Find the book here, as e-book or paperback:

https://www.amazon.com/Sweet-Dreams-T…

Frank is not an expert on National Socialism, WW2, or the allegations that have seared a brand of shame and guilt on the forehead of the German nation, a brand that will burn for generations and will likely liquidate the German people. He traces his personal journey from a young boy who believed everything he read and saw, and came to hate the Germans, to his first doubts and then his present attitude of judging these allegations with a commonsensical eye. He urges all people to exercise that free, commonsensical and intellectually vigorous mindset when bombarded with propaganda that villainizes Germans and paints an angel-devil cartoon portrait of the entire National Socialist, WW2 and Holocaust complex.

He holds that this complex of events is a crucial phase in the long process of white genocide and replacement, and therefore deserves searching and objective analysis. Justice for Germans will contribute immeasurably to the struggle for survival of the entire white family of races.

Note: Small bits of the talk were lost in the splicing of segments of the recording. Among the losses, around the end, Frank describes the torture of Rudolf Hoss, commandant of Auschwitz, to obtain his false confession.

Enough Already! HolocaustDeprogrammingCourse.com

EnjoughAlready!

HolocaustDeprogrammingCourse.com

Holocaust deprogramming course

Do you care to know about how the people you have trusted all your lives have lied to you?

If anything were to ever convince you of the terrible Jewish lies about World War II, this would be that document. You can’t possibly read this compilation of sources by hundreds of serious minded examiners and still believe the lies that mainstream accounts have forced upon you as “the truth” of World War II.

Many thanks to my friend “pdk” in France.
Please read as much as your mind can tolerate. You will never find as many courageous truth tellers represented in one place.
Best wishes,
John Kaminski

Escape From The Holocaust Lie by Arthur Topham

EscapeHoloHdr

Escape From The Holocaust Lie

By
Arthur Topham

“The first and most important value is the freedom to debate, the freedom to think, the freedom to speak and the freedom to disagree. This prosecution, has already had a very serious effect on those freedoms. If it were to result in a conviction, I suggest to you that a process of witch-hunting would begin in our society where everyone who had a grievance against anyone else would say “Uh-huh, you are false, and I’ll take you or pressure somebody else to take you to court and force you to defend yourself.”
~ Douglas Christie, Barrister & Solicitor from his Summation to the Jury
in the Ernst Zundel Trial, February 25, 1985

I chose the above quote from Douglas Christie, the greatest defender of freedom of speech Canada has ever produced. Doug, more than any other person I know (and I knew him personally for seven years right up to the time of his death in March of 2013), epitomized the spirit of Truth, intelligence of Heart, the noble Grace and indefatigable Courage and Integrity of a free man all combined with an adamantine faith in God.

DouglasHChristiecopy_zps43b1b5c0

It was due in great part to the efforts of Doug Christie during the trial of Ernst Zundel that he, like the biblical Moses of old, was able to lead the captured consciousness of Truth Seekers of the 20th Century out of their mentally-induced prisons into the fertile lands of freedom of speech and expression.

tazebook_dees-1-copy

Ernst Zundel had been charged under Section 177 of the Criminal Code for having knowingly “published false news that was likely to be injurious to the public good” when he began dispensing a small booklet titled Did Six Million Really Die? – one which he hadn’t written himself but felt expressed his views on the alleged Jewish Holocaust. It was Zundel’s trial that finally brought to a head the (then) forty years of Canadians wondering aimlessly through a cognitive “6 Million” wilderness of deception not knowing that all the while they were being psychically manipulated and conditioned to believe the greatest LIE ever told to humanity.

Awhile ago I typed out and digitally recorded on RadicalPress.com Doug Christie’s Summation to the Jury which first appeared in booklet form not too long after the trial ended and I highly recommend that anyone in the least concerned about this massive experiment in mind control read it. If nothing else it will vividly show you the brilliance and logic (and levity) of the lawyer who honestly earned his handle “The Battling Barrister”.

ZundelTrialFreeSpeechDC800 copy

Doug Christie put the issue of Ernst Zundel’s concerns before the jury in the following manner:

“The booklet Did Six Million Really Die? is more important for German people than it is maybe for others, because there is a real guilt daily inculcated against German people in the media every time they look at the war.

The German people have been portrayed for forty years in the role of the butchers of six million.”

In Christie’s Summation to the Jury at the culmination of the trial he recapped much of what was revealed to the court through weeks of mind-bending cross-examination, regarding this one fundamental LIE that has superseded all other interpretations of what took place during WW 2 in German occupied territories in Eastern Europe.

During the Zundel Trial Christie literally demolished the illusions of the “gas chambers” and the “6 Million Jews” myth that the Crown and its Expert Witness Raul Hilberg had attempted to foist upon the Jury and, by extension, the nation and the world as a whole. The final results showed that the much-touted, world renowned “holocaust expert” Raul Hilberg’s testimony (the Jews considered Hilberg to be their No. 1 man) ultimately proved to be nothing more than unsubstantiated bluff.

As Doug Christie put it in his summation:

“Who denies Dr. Hilberg the right to publish his views? Who denies that he should be free to say there was a Hitler order to exterminate Jews? Not my client; not me; nobody in society denies him that right. Who denies anyone the right to publish their views? Well, it’s the position of my client that he’s obliged to justify his publication. And I suggest he has….”

“Has Dr. Hilberg proved a single thing here to be false? No, he hasn’t. He says he had documents. He produces none. He talks about the train tickets and schedules. What train tickets and schedules? If we’re talking about a criminal case we should have evidence. There isn’t enough evidence here today to convict one person for murdering one other person. But they want you to believe that six million died, or millions died, and that this question mark is false. Where is the evidence to support one murder by one person? There is no Hitler order; there is an alleged order somewhere by somebody alleged to have heard it from somebody else. There’s no evidence.”

RaulHilbergPic

And the Beat(ing) Goes On

Now, seventy-one years later (thirty-one years after Doug’s summation) we’re still witnessing the relentless, malicious efforts of the Zionist Jews (and their sycophant zombie clones) to brow-beat, bludgeon, bedazzle and intimidate Canadians into accepting as FACT everything that the Ernst Zundel trial legally established as mere FICTION.

I am specifically referring to the current mainstream media uproar of feigned sound and fury that’s overtaken not only the local media in Jasper, Alberta The Jasper Local, and the Canadian Edmonton, Alberta media but has even extended itself to the state of Israel’s Haaretz newspaper since one of Jasper’s better known residents and peace activists, Monika Schaefer, published a short video denouncing the alleged “6 Million Jewish Holocaust”. The video in question was titled, Sorry Mom, I was wrong about the Holocaust.

MonikaSchaeferSorryMomHdr copy

No ifs ands or buts, it’s intentional mind-control on the same level as that of MKULTRA.

No ifs and or buts, it’s intentional mind-control on the same level as that of MKULTRA. Canadians, like people everywhere, have been unwittingly under the hypnotic, sorcerer’s spell of Jewish controlled “mainstream media” since the end of World War 2. They have surreptitiously endured a lifetime of brainwashing and mendaciously motivated mind control and for many today they still have little or no clue that the alleged “6 Million Jewish Holocaust” was and is the BIGGEST and most pervasive LIE ever foisted upon the world.

Of course that’s how it was intentionally designed to be when the perpetrators of this fantastic fiction first formulated, then forecast for use on such a massive scale, their serpentine “6 Million” siren song purposely meant to entrap the masses into subconsciously entering a Zionist-induced cognitive gulag or concentration camp strikingly similar to their own Talmudic Rabbi’s historically induced ghetto consciousness that forms the superstructure upon which Zionism’s atheistic ideological edifice rests.

Back in 2009 I wrote an article titled Israel’s Wall: For Palestinians or Jews? where I try to show the similitude between the wall that the Israeli government constructed on stolen Palestinian land and the mental/emotional wall that the Talmudic Rabbis built around their own tribe in order to control the minds of each successive generation of Jews and keep them trapped in the Talmudic oral “law”; an alleged law that purported made them especially chosen by God to rule over the world and because of that exclusiveness therefore separate and a step above the rest of humanity. It was a thesis first put forward by the British author and journalist Douglas Reed in his monumental classic, The Controversy of Zion.

The final point thought that needs to be restated again and again is the fact that down through history and right up until the 20th Century the most astute observers of civilized development in the West continually questioned and criticized the actions and motives of the Babylonian Talmudic tribe of Pharisees whenever they began to meddle too deeply in the affairs of other nation states but beginning with the take-over of the majority of the media in the West around the turn of the 20th century this practise began to cease and in its place there began renewed efforts on the part of the Zionist Jews to attack any and all critics of their ideology and their actions with the endless epithets of “anti-Semite” and “racist” and “Jew Hater”, an enterprise that has today reached such epidemic proportions that critics of present day Zionism lay wasting away in dungeons and website owners, university professors, researchers and writers everywhere are being accused of “hate crimes” throughout most, if not all, western nations.

Monika Schaefer’s case is the latest in that long and disgusting list of Truth Revealers who Jewish lobby organizations like B’nai Brith Canada and the new viper on the holohoax block The Centre for Israel & Jewish Affairs (CIJA) along with all their trance-induced toady followers are attempting to smear and degrade and destroy in order to keep the BIG LIE from being questioned.

CanadaBBLOBBY3 copy 5

What to do?

The longer this travesty of injustice goes on the more insanely vile and blood-thirsty the Zionists are becoming. Their desperation has grown almost exponentially over the past decade as they wend their way through the corridors of Canada’s justice system plying their rag-tag “hate crime” laws in order to safeguard the collusion they’ve made with the Devil.

No better example of just how demented it’s becoming was the latest attack upon Monika Schaefer that occurred but a day or so ago in Jasper. When Monika Schaefer moved to Jasper, Alberta busking (i.e. the playing of an instrument on the public streets) was illegal. Bearing that in mind, in communication with Monika over this matter  she told me the following:

“The irony of the fact is that it was me who brought the issue of busking to town council already a few years ago, made a presentation (at least on one occasion, and have raised it a few times since…) to support busking in town. You see, it has always been illegal to busk in Jasper. Yes, you read correctly Arthur. Anyway, so you see the irony – I have been pushing for busking for a long time. This summer is the first time it is legal. So when I went yesterday to get my busking license, my senses already went up. Dave wasn’t there, but the woman who was there (whom I have also known for decades – it’s a small town) was behaving very cagy. Then I left a phone message, text message, and email message with the person who was supposedly in charge (someone else, not even Dave). Today my gut feeling of yesterday was proven correct when I received Dave’s message.”

And here’s the rub for those who haven’t read the article. Dave’s message read: “We have considered your application for a busking permit in Jasper. In light of your recently publicly proclaimed non-inclusive beliefs we have decided to decline a permit to you at this time.”

“publicly proclaimed non-inclusive beliefs” !!!???

As one commenter on RadicalPress. com wrote in reply to the article, Surely you guys are making this up! because no one can possibly be dumb enough to actually write and publish that sentence – NOT, in Canada, no f’n way!”

Unfortunately for Canada someone in an official position with the municipal government of Jasper, Alberta DID write that sentence and sent it to Monika Schaefer.

Since my own arrest, incarceration and criminal case began back in May of 2012 after I was charged with “communicating statements” that did “willfully promote hatred against an identifiable group, people of the Jewish religion or ethnic origin, contrary to Section 319(2) of the Criminal Code” I’ve been doing my damnedest to warn Canadians of the extreme danger of these so-called “Hate Propaganda” laws that the Zionist Jew lobbyists created and are using with increasing fervour and zeal to censor any and all criticism of their deeds both here at home and abroad in the state of Israel. And of course the kicker is the fact that they used the “6 Million” holocaust lie in order to justify the inclusion of these Orwellian anti-free speech laws into Canadian jurisprudence.

Given the current Prime Minister of Canada, Justin Trudeau’s, longstanding indoctrination on the holocaust deception and his unabashed public display of obeisance to the perpetrators of this hoax there’s little chance that we will see him do what Conservative PM Stephen Harper did with the equally nefarious Sec. 13(1) legislation formerly contained in the Canadian Human Rights Act; that is, repeal the law. But that is the only and final solution to this “hate speech” madness that’s slithered like a snake from out of that den of vipers known as the Canadian “Jewish Lobby”.

RepealHateLaws-1000 copy 2

The issue must be taken from Cybespace’s Facebook and the Alternative media and transposed down onto the streets and turned into a public spectacle that the mainstream media cannot refuse to cover. Instead of focussing their attention on Gay Pride festivities it’s time that the Jewish-controlled media was forced to recognize that the fundamental rights of ALL Canadians are being jeopardized by these draconian “hate speech” laws and the only way this is going to happen is if normal, law-abiding citizens of Canada get their act together and begin to openly PROTEST this blatant act of sedition by these foreign lobbyists against Canadians’ lawful right to freedom of expression both on and off the Internet.

The time to organize this is NOW. Their game plan is so in our face obvious and the people know it. All that remains is for concerned Canadians to stand up, take to the streets and say ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!

If we want our basic freedoms we’re going to have to fight to hang on to them one way or another.

______

CANADA: The New Sodom and Gomorrah? By Arthur Topham

 

CANADASODOM?

CANADA: The New Sodom and Gomorrah?

By
Arthur Topham

On May 17th, 2016, a day recognized by the federal government as “International Day Against Homophobia, Transphobia, and Biphobia”, an edict emanated forth from Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s office (PMO) stating that the Liberal government was planning to make additional changes to the “Hate Propaganda” laws (Sections 318 to 320) of the Criminal Code of Canada in order to “protect” the nation’s sexually deviant members.

UpYoursTrudeauJr

The unabashed and strident manner in which the federal government is pushing forward with its controversial agenda of planned perversion and subversion of Canadian society (under the guise of supposed “human rights” for sexual aberrants) is an issue fraught with deep and troubling concern, not only those Canadians of the Christian faith who prefer to rely upon the eternal wisdom of God and Nature but also for millions of other citizens whose moral standards won’t permit them to accept the subversive and sinister hidden aim within the government’s mandate to criminalize public dissent and discussion on moral, ethical and health standards affecting the nation as a whole.

In the words of the PM, “To do its part, the Government of Canada today will introduce legislation that will help ensure transgender and other gender-diverse people can live according to their gender identity, free from discrimination, and protected from hate propaganda and hate crimes.”

FREEXPRESSIONLOCKUP copy 4

The reality that the federal government intends to expand rather than repeal Section 318 – 320 of the Canadian Criminal Code is disconcerting  in itself given the excessively subjective nature of this draconian section of the Code. The concept of “Hate Propaganda” as a “criminal offence” is nothing less than a blatant example of government mind control; one that, here in Canada, has proven itself over the last half century of contentious litigation, to be extremely controversial, provocative and unjust and a clear and present danger to freedom of expression or “free speech” as defined by Canada’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

The alarm bells ought to be ringing across the country at the thought of this new “Liberal” government of Justin Trudeau pulling the Orwellian zipper of censorship even tighter over the mouths of Canada’s citizens than his predecessor Harper. It appears to be a new day but still the same old shit – of increasingly repressive laws and greater restrictions on individual freedoms theoretically guaranteed by our Charter.

5FeetFury copy

In fact the threat of expanding Canada’s “hate” laws to include ‘Tranny’(i.e. transvestite) protection has already angered and incensed Canadian bloggers as we see in the following reaction by Kathy Shaidle, one of the veterans of the previous “Section 13” wars that were ongoing during Harper’s reign.

As I’ve stated numerous times and especially in my essay Bad Moon Rising: How the Jewish Lobbies Created Canada’s “Hate Propaganda” Laws, these Communist-inspired laws were surreptitiously and deliberately put in place through the mendacious actions of various Jewish lobby organizations such as the Canadian Jewish Congress, B’nai Brith Canada and, more recently, the newly-formed Centre for Israel & Jewish Affairs, all of whom have worked in tandem for decades to ensure that issues to do with Israel and its Zionist ideological political system would ultimately fall within this section of the Code and therefore make any truthful and factual statements about important civil and national issues indictable offences.

What must be clearly understood from the start when discussing the issue of  “Hate Propaganda” laws is that the notion of elevating the natural emotional feeling of hatred into a pseudo-legal category wherein it becomes an indictable offence is purely an invention of the Zionist Jews and in certain respects an historical concomitant of the Bolshevik era’s Leninist/Stalinist totalitarian terror regimes. One could rightly state that its essential character is embodied in such classics of “hate” literature as Germany Must Perish!, a book written back in 1941 by the Jewish author Theodore N. Kaufman with the sole purpose of inciting America to hate Germany and then translate that hatred into the USA joining the Allies in their unjust war against the National Socialist government of Germany.

EyeOnFreeSpeech600

In a previous article entitled Canada: Hypocrite Nation Ruled by Zionist Deception & anti-Free Speech Laws I had the following to say about these despicable, sham legal subterfuges disguised as legitimate jurisprudence:

“The war to silence Canadians and stymie any public speech that the Jewish lobby felt might negatively impact them or Israel in any way (either on or off the internet), gained its foothold back in 1977 when the federal government first implemented the so-called Canadian Human Rights Act and created its attendant enforcement agencies, the Canadian Human Rights Commission and the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal (CHRT). Both the commission and the tribunal were quasi-judicial, i.e. “crazy” judicial in that they basically set their own rules and guidelines and consistently changed the “legal” goal posts depending upon whatever case they were dealing with, in order to ensure a conviction. If fact, of the hundreds of Canadians dragged before these Stalinist style “Show Trial” tribunals, EVERYONE was found guilty for the simple reason that all it took was for someone to register a complain against them and that, in itself, sealed their fate. When I describe Section 13 as a “Bolshevik” type law I do so with the full knowledge that under the former Soviet system, Lenin, in one of the regime’s very first acts upon gaining absolute power, was to make “anti-Semitism” a crime punishable by death. Death, that is, without so much as a trial even. All it would take, (just as with the Section 13 “complaints”) was for someone to accuse another of said crime and the Cheka (soviet secret police) had the excuse to liquidate the victim.”

Reporting on this issue in Christian News Heather Clark remarks that apart from the criminal aspects of this proposed legislation there are those like Charles McVety, president of the Institute for Canadian Values and others who consider the bill to be “nebulous and reckless.”

Clark’s article goes on, “Bill C-16 is so vague, it is unenforceable,” he [McVety] said in a statement. “The fluid nature of gender identity is so nebulous that people can change their gender identity moment by moment. In that the bill seeks to change the Criminal Code of Canada, people may be sent to prison for two years over something that is ill-defined, and indeterminable.”

“It is also reckless as the proposed law will establish universal protection for any man who wishes to access women’s bathrooms or girls’ showers with momentary gender fluidity,” McVety continued. “Every Member of Parliament should examine their conscience over the potential of their vote exposing women and girls to male genitalia.”

JewShitter

In the context of our Charter rights Clark says, “There is also uncertainty as to how the law will be applied to free speech. As previously reported, in 2013, the Supreme Court of Canada upheld the conviction of activist William Whatcott, who found himself in hot water after distributing flyers regarding the Bible’s prohibitions against homosexuality throughout the Saskatoon and Regina neighborhoods in 2001 and 2002.”

Bill-Whatcott-Image

As Charles McVety rightfully stated the proposed Bill C-16 is definitely “nebulous and reckless” but as past convictions in both the cases of Section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act and Section 319(2) of the Canadian Criminal Code show, simply because it’s “vague” doesn’t mean that it isn’t “enforceable”. All it takes are judges and justices within the Canadian judicial system who will interpret and lend credence to subjective definitions of nebulous terms such as “hatred” so that they may then shapeshift into whatever meaning the Crown wishes in order to fit the charge. No better example currently exists than the latest and most severe case of Whatcott.

Conclusion: What’s coming next?

During the heated Sec. 13 Campaign here in Canada when the Canadian Human Rights Act was being wielded like a club by the Canadian Human Rights Commission and bloggers around the country were being bludgeoned and jailed, fined and nailed to the “hate crime” cross the Zionist element within the Conservative Right finally realized that the Sec. 13 legislation no longer was serving just their purposes but was being turned against them as well. As a result they garnered the support of Canada’s Zionist media monopoly and the lobbying to repeal the specious section of the Act was eventually accomplished back in June of 2012. Unfortunately they weren’t smart enough to realize that the “Hate Propaganda” laws within the Criminal Code were even more insidious than Sec. 13. They figured that as long as Sec. 319(2) of the ccc was there and could be used against critics of Israel and anyone else accused of “anti-Semitism” then that was just fine with them. To hell (or jail) with “freedom of speech” if it meant allowing bloggers to speak openly and frankly about the Jews or the Zionist empire builders.

But the tables appear to be turning once again as the new Liberal government of Justin Trudeau begins forcing their faggot philosophy down the throats of unwilling Canadians and then, on top of that monumental insult, threatens the nation with increased criminal penalties of up to two years in jail for anyone who doesn’t want to go happily and gayly along down the road to Sodom and Gomorrah carrying their little rainbow flag in hand.

Will they eventually start campaigning to repeal these anti-free speech laws contained in Sec. 318 to 320 of the Criminal Code and get rid of the last vestiges of Orwellian censorship in Canada?

Time will soon tell.

——

SUPPORTFREEDOMOFSPEECH

The upcoming challenge to this Zionist-created false flag legislation will determine once and for all whether or not Canada will adhere to the spirit and intent of its Charter of Rights and Freedoms or continue to bow down to foreign interests and sacrificing its citizen’s fundamental rights.
Please try to assist in this process by making a small donation to the cause. My GoGetFunding site can be found here: http://gogetfunding.com/canadian-publisher-faces-jail-for-political-writings/
Standing for Canada and our democratic ideals I remain,
Sincerely,
Arthur Topham
Pub/Ed
The Radical Press
Canada’s Radical News Network
“Digging to the root of the issues since 1998”

––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

Farewell Hans! Memorial Service for Hans J. Krampe by Arthur Topham

HansFuneralHdrFinal copy

HansPortraitLrg

Farewell Hans!

Memorial Service for Hans J. Krampe

By

Arthur Topham

Publisher & Editor

RadicalPress.com

Our dear brother and comrade-in-arms Hans J. Krampe slipped out of his mortal coil on December 13th, 2014 leaving behind him a world fraught with endless war, political and economic turmoil and environmental destruction on a scale never before witnessed by humankind.

Those of us left behind who knew Hans personally came together to honour and pay our final respects to him on April 20th, 2015, a day that one of the participants remarked was most auspicious given that in B.C. April 20th has been, for the past 20 years, an official day of celebration for those who favour the use of the medicinal herb cannabis and, coincidentally or not, also the birthday of Adolf Hitler.  Both of these events were important dates connected to the life of Hans Krampe.

There were no large crowds of people in attendance on what turned out to be a warm and partially sunny, spring afternoon in Quesnel, British Columbia, Canada where Hans had made his home. The sky was filled with a combination of regular puffy white clouds and the usual chemtrails that are now a regular occurrence throughout the province. In his time spend in the Cariboo, Hans had befriended a small, eclectic group of people with whom he associated. He was not big on being a social animal and lived a relatively secluded life atop his mountain retreat a few kilometres outside the city of Quesnel.

Hans'Home

After Hans’ untimely passing I was able to assist in preparing a memorial service thanks to the Clayton Funeral Home in Quesnel who contacted me and offered their help. Being the dead of winter and also having to try and contact Hans’ next of kin who were in Germany, as well as other friends and associates, I decided to set the date for 4/20/2015. It turned out to have been a good choice.

A motley crew of men and women who, for assorted reasons, had become a part of Hans’ life over his years in the community gathered together at 1:00 pm in what is called Tranquility Gardens, now Hans’ final resting place, to sharing their thoughts and feelings about this unique individual who had left his mark on each one of us and so many more on the Internet.

HansServiceParticapants copy

The service itself was not planned out in advance as I had no idea who or how many folks would be showing up but once Hans’ friends arrived and settled into their seats I took to the podium that Christopher Fitzgerald, Clayton’s Funeral Director had kindly set up for the event and proceeded to read out the condolences that people had sent to me via email from around the world – touching tributes to a man who, in the past 16 years of his life, had established himself as one of the more knowledgable and passionate defenders of historical truth with respect to the history of his former home country of Germany.

ChristopherFitzgerald copy

I began by reading out a letter I received from Hans’ sister Gudula who lives in Germany. Her son Stephan, Hans’ nephew, translated it into English.

Having began his early life in Eastern-Germany (DDR) next to Berlin Gedula was the first to note Hans’ wanderlusting spirit and wrote that he began “globetrotting” early in life, traveling alone at the ripe old age of 5-6 on the train to Western Berlin to visit his aunt. As she said, “To the delight of his parents it was up to them to bring him back home again.”

Hans, being the persistent fellow that he was, continued packing his knapsack and fleeing his East German residence and so eventually his parents decided to send him to school in West Berlin.

I personally recall many an evening’s conversation with Hans when he would relate stories of his early years and his experiences while attending a Waldorf school where his education was geared more toward self-expression and artistic achievement rather than the usual rote memorization of facts, figures and logic. It suited his temperament and laid the groundwork for his later literary life as a writer and artist.

Upon completion of his high school Hans entered into an apprenticeship to become a Tool & Dye maker and trained in the profession until finally coming to the decision that he wasn’t cut out for such a rigid lifestyle. He decided at that point to join the German navy and head out on the high seas for fun and adventure. He spent some years aboard fast patrol boats in the North Sea off Germany’s coast where he became proficient as a signal man and sailor.

Gudula went on to write that Hans also spent time in Scotland and later in Greece where he lived an ascetic existence on a small island in the Mediterranean.  It was during this period that he met friends from Canada who told him about the country thus piquing his curiosity to the point where he eventually decided to leave Europe and head off to the “New World” of North America. He never looked back and remained in Canada for the last forty years of his life.

Landing in Montreal in 1974 Hans soon headed West where he found steady employment in Canada’s Northwest Territories working at a large Tungsten mine called Cantung where he drove heavy equipment until its closure in 1986. It was during his time spent at Cantung that Hans began to develop his writing skills which later on would serve him well with the advent of the internet.

Having worked hard and saved Hans then ventured down into British Columbia with grubstake in  hand eventually purchased the twenty acre parcel of land in the Cariboo region that would become his home and life’s love and work.

As Gudula also observed, Hans, while living up in the northwest, had witnessed the destruction of the old growth forests by the logging industry and being a sensitive man soon became a fervent defender of the environment and a “green activist fearing no confrontation in order that the public should know how they were being manipulated and cheated.”HansInGodWeTrustGraphic copy 2

One of Hans’ pen and ink graphics depicting Canada’s political realities

Summing up Hans’ life Gudula wrote, “He also worked as an illustrator and writer for a newspaper called “The Radical” beginning in 1998 and until his death he continued to uncover abuses in Canada. Possibly it now it will become a bit more silent there because Hans always stood up for what he believed in. He was a true campaigner.

My brother was a fervent supporter of justice who held strong convictions. And he loved his Canada! That how I will keep him in memory!

I am very unhappy and sad that he died alone. For sure his passing was unexpected by many of his friends. We all will miss him.

Until our last conversation he always called me “my little mouse”. For him I was always his 18 years old sister.

Thank you so much.

Gudula Schoen”

Following Gudula’s heartfelt letter I then read condolences coming from Australia and the USA and elsewhere in Canada where Hans’ literary achievements over the years had gained him a faithful following.

As Dagmar Brenne, writing from Australia, put it, “I wish to add my name to the list of people who are gathering in remembrance of Hans Krampe. May he rest in peace and may his name be engraved in the immortal book of life. The way, the truth and the life is our motto. May the truth be victorious over the avalanche of lies. Amen and amen.”

It is at this point that I must pay special tribute to some mutual friends of Hans’ and mine who are deserving of attention as their lives and our became inextricably linked in the early years of the publication of The Radical and have continue on to the present day.

When I ceased my former teaching career and started the alternative publishing business The Radical Press in June of 1998 both Hans and myself, while eager to begin telling the world about all the things that the mainstream media was not covering, were still naively ignorant as to actual events as they related to the history of Hans’ former home country Germany. Without a doubt both of us were well-versed in most of the controversial political issues of the day, having been dedicated environmentalists and social justice critics for decades, but when it came to Adolf Hitler and the “Nazis” (the ingrained epitome of the symbolic “bad guys”), our judgements were still severely crippled by the lack of reliable, factual information as well as a lifetime of having been mentally groomed (indoctrinated) by the media and publishing houses to be anti-Hitler and anti-National Socialist and so whenever we required a metaphor or simile to describe some gross injustice of massive proportions it was usually ol’ Adolf who became the scapegoat for all the world woes.

One of many topics of discussion in The Radical around the year 2000 was gun control. It was also the period when Canada’s then Prime Minister, Jean Chretien, suddenly called a snap election in the fall catching the official opposition party, the Canadian Alliance (formerly the Reform Party of Canada), off guard. The leader of the Canadian Alliance at the time was Stockwell Day who would soon be replaced by Stephen Harper in 2002. One of the topics of the time was the controversial Liberal long gun registry and the Canadian Alliance were challenging Chretien on their policies.

In my Vol. 3 No.4  November 2000 edition of The Radical I had published a Guest Editorial by Donna Young, then owner of a Dawson Creek, B.C. publication, on the topic of gun control titled “Gun Control Idealism” and along with it a cartoon graphic by artist Cliff Woffenden depicting Chretien and Day in election mode. It was also, by coincidence, the first edition of the paper after having joined forces with Sue Potvin, former publisher of another alternative newspaper called Discourse & Disclosure (D&D) in eastern Canada. D&D was inserted into my publication for distribution and that is how it found its way into the hands of Walter and Herta Ruthard of Lisle, Ontario who, at the time, were subscribers to D&D.

Cliff'sNaziCartoon copy 2

Soon after publication I received a letter from Walter Ruthard which is presented here in the graphic below. This was the turning point for both Hans and myself in terms of questioning the official status quo perception of historic events as they pertained to World War II and German history in general as written by the victors after 1945.

RuthardLet2RadJan2001

As a result of Walter Ruthard’s critique of The Radical’s stance on Hitler and the National Socialist government of 1933 – 1945 both Hans and I were brought back to reality and from that point on our interest in history took on a distinctive, revisionist perspective.

“Dear Arthur,

Thank you so much for your offer to read our obituary for Hans Krampe. Thank you also for the beautiful memorial picture you have sent us!

Hoping that you are OK.

Herta, Walter and Sonja Ruthard

For whom the bell tolls

For you, Hans, it tolled far too soon; you were our comrade in the “trenches”. Your fight was our fight too, and together we tried to break the web of lies and slavery that threatens to choke out the peoples of this world.

Ever a leader, you took the final step before us too. Your passing is a great loss for this small band of the faithful, but our numbers will grow, not least of all thanks to you and to the tireless work for truth that is your legacy: the great stone with your initials, is in the wall our Lord will build around us to protect us from the evil of the world.

In this certainty, we remember you with profound gratitude. How could we ever forget you!

Your friends Herta, Walter and Sonja Ruthard”

DSC_0009 copy 2

Hans’ living room and study

Another longtime friend of Hans’ who knew him well, Paul Dykstra, had the following to say in an email which I received just prior to Hans’ service.

“Greetings to all who are friends of Hans, and I definitely count myself among you! Hans is a loyal soul and was a devoted friend to those he chose to befriend, which included me and my family. He knew how to be with children, and he was always open minded and brooked no bullshit from anyone.

When we moved to the US in 1999, Hans graciously accepted our dog, Kai, and that dog became more his than he ever was ours, because once Hans decided to do something he did it right, and with all his resources. Kai and Hans became best friends.

Hans&Kai

Hans with his faithful friend Kai

Our bond stayed strong as I called him at whiles, and, especially on our mutual birthday, November 30th. Because we were both born on that day, we had a special kinship and understanding, a Sagittarian bond, and I enjoyed that all the time we were in Quesnel and knew him, and also in these later years.

He used to come and visit at B & B Music, and was a music lover and a fine storyteller also.

Hans never abandoned anything he knew to be the truth, and was not afraid to remind anyone of us when we were not paying attention to issues that, deep down, we knew were important.

I know that he is a Free Spirit, and can now continue on his Quest, as we all will.

Peace and Love to you, Hans, and we send you and all our friends NAMASTE!

Thanks, everyone”

Following the reading of the eulogies to Hans from his family, cyber associates and friends I turned the podium over to those in attendance and further stories and endearing tales were forthcoming.

One of Hans’ older friends told us about meeting Hans just after he had purchased his property on Birch Hill road. The ground had been recently logged and the first thing that Hans did was go up to Prince George, a city approximately 100 km north of Quesnel, where he purchased 10,000 young trees that he then proceeded to plant all over his 20 acre property. This project became Hans’ life work and today his land is covered with healthy, sturdy young pine, fir and spruce trees that give his estate a beautiful park-like appearance.

Another close acquaintance told us stories of Han’s great love for music and how he had influenced people to listen to some of the great bands that emerged during the 1960’s in Britain and on the European continent. Hans soon befriended many of the local musicians in Quesnel and was always to be found at the jam sessions and performances wherever music was being played.

HansShastahArthur

Fun times together at Hans’ home with my wife Shastah and I (circa 2003)

There were also humorous stories from others who had worked with Hans when he was a tree-planter back in the late ’80’s and early ’90’s. Being the fervent environmentalist that Hans was he often was at the forefront when it came to defending the land  and the natural resources and was always willing to speak out at demonstrations associated with government sponsored clear-cutting of BC’s wilderness areas.

DSC_0050 copy

The bronze plaque above where Hans’ urn rests epitomizes his life & work  

After much laughter and good cheer and stories it came time to lay Hans’ ashes to rest and Christopher Fitzgerald brought out the urn containing Hans’ last corporeal remains and sat it next to the place where it was to be held. The honour of placing his urn was mine and so I walked over to where it was sitting and carefully picked up the small gold-coloured square box. Having never participated in such a ceremony I was unaware of the actual weight of the urn and upon lifting it I surprised by this phenomenon and exclaimed, “Wow, I didn’t think it would be so heavy!” No sooner had I blurted it out than Christopher said, “He ain’t heavy, he’s your brother!” and everyone enjoyed one last laugh.

DSC_0036 copy 2

As I stood there holding Hans’ remains in my hands his friend Doug Gook took out his silver flute and began to play Amazing Grace. We listened in silence and said our final prayers and farewells to Hans.

DSC_0045 copy 2

 Hans krampe’s name will undoubtedly go down in the annals of cyber history as a German Revisionist who contributed to the growing wealth of information and historic truth that is now successfully challenging the old paradigm falsely created by the Zionist-controlled governments and media after World War II.

May God watch over him and may his soul be at peace.

Mehr Licht! Herr Krampe.

Zion’s Zombie Army: Neo-Zionist zealots attack RadicalPress.com by Arthur Topham

ZION'SZOMBIES 700

Zion’s Zombie Army: Neo-Zionist zealots attack RadicalPress.com

By
Arthur Topham

“The problem is, The Radical, like D&D, has connections and it has influence.”
– Will Offley, DRY ROT: The Far Right Targets the Left,
Canadian Dimension magazine, Jan/Feb/2001

“It’s the same old story
Everywhere I go,
I get slandered, libelled
I hear words I never heard in the Bible”
Paul Simon, “Keep The Customer Satisfied

Intro

Being a longstanding member of the alternative new media one expects to be subjected to an endless array of vituperation, slander, hate, maligning, slurs, false accusations, etc. It comes with the territory; that being the vast, uncharted landscape known as Truth-revealing.

In the case of RadicalPress.com the assaults upon my then hard copy, bimonthly tabloid known as The Radical (June 1998 to June 2002) began in earnest around the turn of the century approximately two years after I began publishing. By that point in time I had established myself as a rather unique specimen in the then fledgling alternative press.

Here in Canada, as elsewhere within the world’s democracies, the yin/yang nature of the present system of governance inevitably affords the Canadian citizen, taxpayer and voter a “choice” between either a left wing or a right wing style government with either of these variations taking on additional names and identities. The “left”, historically, has been the Liberal Party of Canada and the “right” has operated under the guise of the Conservative Party of Canada throughout its history.

Following the general pattern set around the Western world, by the beginning of the 20th century a new kid suddenly appeared on the political block whose outward appearance and purpose was aimed at garnering the support of the great unwashed masses, the “Proletariat”, many of whom had only recently achieved suffrage. As they became known within the literature of the day this new kid’s schtick was basically the political ideology we understand today as “socialism” although throughout much of its genesis it quickly became co-oped by the Marxist strain that preferred to be known as “communism”.

Those socialist/communist ideals and precepts then became firmly embodied in Canadian politics during the 1930’s when the Western world was being held in thrall to a devastating economic “depression” euphemistically known as the “Dirty Thirties”; a deliberate event brought on by the machinations of the private money lenders (all Jews) who, in 1913, had successfully pulled off the greatest financial coup in world history when they were given a license by the United States government to manufacture fiat currency out of thin air and then lend it out at usurious cost to borrowers.

Concomitant with the surreptitiously gained, carte blanche freedom to create untold wealth (embodied under the false flag tag of the “U.S. Federal Reserve” and later aptly referred to as the Creature from Jekyll Island by the American writer G. Edward Griffin), the “fed” was able to use its ill-gained power to manipulate the stock markets and influence the overall wealth of the nation for good or bad, all dependent upon agenda which this Rothschild cartel clandestinely conspired to author for their own benefit and that of their tribe.

And so out of all this financial intrigue-wreaking economic havoc around the Western world emerged a new “Made in Canada” “left” political party known as the Co-operative Commonwealth Federation (CCF), led by a man who justifiably may be called the nation’s most truthful, honest and honourable Statesman, Thomas “Tommy” Clement Douglas.

First elected to office in Saskatchewan in 1935 as a CCF member of the House of Commons Tommy then resigned to run for the leadership of the provincial CCF and in 1944 they won an overwhelming majority and his party became the first-ever socialist government in North America. In 1961, the CCF formed the New Democratic Party (NDP) of Canada under Tommy’s leadership and, as they say, the rest is history.

It must be borne in mind though that the Tommy Douglas version of socialism was fundamentally different from that of Canada’s Communist Party which never was able to align its own Marxist-Leninist (Zionist) policies with those of the democratic socialism of either the CCF or, later, the NDP. Douglas had little use for any form of socialism involving people who did little else but sit around talking about Marx or Lenin or Trotsky waited patiently for the next “revolution” to start that would usher in the type of totalitarian Bolshevik government that formed the former Soviet system. Tommy’s socialism was based on Christian principles of brotherhood and helping others less fortunate than oneself rather than following a rigid, dogmatic Marxist/Leninist doctrine.

TommyDouglasPoster1Red

As a result Canada has never had to endure any serious growth of Marxist-style politics (although shades of things to come can be seen in the behaviour of the current Zionist-controlled Harper Conservatives) and what little did develop tended to be isolated pockets of communist ideologues located within fringe areas of cities across the country.

As the interest in The Radical grew, so did the concern of the minority section of the “left” who, up until that point had basically held a monopoly over the type of information being disseminated to the alternative community around the province and the nation. The group fretting over the information being disseminated via The Radical (and believe me it was as broad in scope as humanly possible, covering as many topics as I could squeeze into 24 pages) turned out to be the Marxist-Leninist-Trotskyist-Zionist section of Vancouver’s East Side, an anomalous collective of atheistic, diehard doctrinaire, commissar throwbacks heavily influenced by all the Jewish writers and activists of the past century.

It was this shadowy, serpentine sub-group of Canada’s socialist “left” who were not impressed at all with the new upstart from Quesnel, B.C. who was suddenly cutting a swath, like anarchist Nestor Mahkno’s raiders did through Lenin’s Bolshevik forces after 1917, through their formerly held media territory. The Radical was covering so many different topics that their Leninized heads began spinning with each new edition that hit the streets giving the term “revolution” a whole new meaning; one that was plainly undermining their traditionally calcified, narcissistic and nihilistic world of Marxist mediocrity.

By the end of the year 2000 things came to a head with the zio-Marxists launching their first full-scale attack upon my newspaper and that of a sister publication from out in Nova Scotia known as Discourse and Disclosure run by Sue Potvin and hosting an array of writers and activists who were then aligning themselves with either of our newspapers.

The vehicle for launching their hostile assault was Canadian Dimension (CD) magazine, also a bimonthly “Left” publication that had been in business for around 6 years and displayed strong ties to the old Marxist-Leninist/Zionist left as well as trade unions. From what I could tell it was heavily influenced by Jewish/Zionist writers and staff.

Screen Shot 2015-03-05 at 6.57.36 PM

Their trigger man for the first volley was a Vancouver-based “researcher and writer” by the name of Will Offley who penned an all-encompassing screed called “DRY ROT: The Far Right Targets the Left”. Its appearance in the January/February 2001 edition of CD set the tone for the future in terms of this Marxist group’s attitude toward Radical Press and their ongoing efforts to marginalize my publication by the use of standard Zionist Jew smear tactics. The article itself is no longer available on the Canadian Dimension website but it is available on RadicalPress.com here.

DryRotOffleyHdr-546x600

As one will note Radical Press is still operating fourteen years later regardless of the relentless attacks by the Zionist forces who continue doing their utmost to control all the political discourse, be on the net or in hard copy alternative publications. Their mask is Zion and their game is always censorship of any anti-Zionist opposing perspectives by any foul means deemed expedient..

HATE IN THE NORTH: Gaily bedight, a not so Gallant knight

Okay, now let’s fast forward to the year 2012. The zionist brainwashed lefties who I’ve coined “neo-Zionists” basically went off my radar screen (with the occasional exception of the Anti-RacistCanada blogsite) after their taskmaster and benefactor, the Jewish masonic B’nai Brith Canada, figured it would be a lot easier to use legislation (contained in the Canadian Human Rights Act which they played a major role in creating after the end of WW2 using the holocaust lie as pretext) to charge me with a sec. 13 “Hate crime”. This allow them to download the responsibility and cost on to the state (and the Canadian taxpayer) who would subsequently take over the harassment and persecution just as they did in all other cases where they didn’t have the courage or integrity to enter into any formal debate on the issues but would rather just label all opposing viewpoints as “hate speech” and have the courts do the dirty work for them. The classic example of this was the Canada’s Jewish lobby’s vile, despicable, traitorous and vicious attacks upon truth revealer Ernst Zundel. One can view his case here to find out the real story about how these hordes of Zion’s Zombies behave when programmed to act as attack dogs for the truth-hating Jews.

GallantFaceofHope 801

Bringing it all down to a local focus, on December 1, 2012 a young man by the name of Daniel Gallant, then completing his Master’s degree in Social Work at the University of Northern British Columbia (UNBC) in Prince George, B.C. (a city about 100 km north of the Quesnel area where I reside), published a short 5-Part series of articles on his website entitled “Hate in the North”. In Part I Gallant introduced himself with the following short statement:

“I am an example of hope, diversity and compassion that can be seen through my work as an anti-racist activist, and a re-formed violent right wing extremist. As a right-wing-skinhead who has committed hundreds of assaults during my time in the white supremacist movement, I believe that my experiences can benefit society by offering insight into hate crimes, and the patterns that surround these violent acts. Over ten years ago I was awakened to a path of redemption and social change through epiphanies at the height of my extremist action.”

Gallant, as he goes to great (one might even say “extreme”) lengths to outline in his autobiographical writings on his websites, tells his readers that he was born into a very dysfunctional family setting and grew up under excruciatingly painful circumstances that resulted in his having to endure all sorts of horrific physical, mental, emotional and spiritual abuse and trauma. The end result of it all landed him in Vancouver, B.C. at the young age of 14 in the very same neighbourhood populated by the fringe lefties who now play a role in this article.

After joining his “neo-Nazi”, “white supremacist” “violent right wing extremist” groups and beating and torturing hundreds of victims this flawed piece of human machinery, either through the grace of God or possibly some other force, finally was able to break free from his bondage to human despair and violence around the time that Israel was destroying the Twin Towers in New York City on September 11th, 2001.

Upon escaping his former fate his road to recovery brought him into contact with a number of remedial groups and agencies and individuals who all had varying degrees of influence on his healing. Foremost was his family connection with First Nations culture stemming from his early childhood out in Alberta. But, as is the case in so many instances of individuals who have suffered extreme trauma in their lives, Daniel Gallant’s road to recovery was fraught with new obstacles and challenges which, as one can see from reviewing his path to the present day, have led him into a new world paradigm that poses as great a challenge as his former incarnation as a “violent right wing extremist neo-Nazi skinhead white supremacist”.

Today Daniel Gallant is on a crusade to make amends for all of his past sins and in doing so he is now being encouraged and supported by yet another group of even more dangerous, fanatical zealots than his former associates, these being the Zionist criminal cartel itself, the world’s foremost problem and threat to global peace and security and the front organization for the Devil himself.

Following his heartfelt confessions (somewhat reminiscent, for those familiar with the Bible, of St. Paul himself), the remainder of Part I focusses on his connections to and interpretations of supposed “violent right wing extremists” and the “white supremacist movement”, both of which are the focus of “a unique and powerful new global force” called the “Against Violent Extremism (AVE) Network” which, as Gallant states, “is managed by the Institute for Strategic Dialogue (ISD) and is a unique private sector partnership between ISD, Google Ideas, the Gen Next Foundation and Rehab Studio.”and which he is now associated with as well. [all emphasis throughout this article is mine. A.T.]

There is an old saying that one can usually find out a lot about a person by the company they keep so, with that in mind, let’s have a look at some of Daniel Gallant’s new-found “friends” who have been so helpful in supporting and promoting his current mission in life as the new Simon Wiesenthal “neo-Nazi”, “white supremacist”, “violent right wing extremist”, “hate” hunter.

For starters the “Against Violent Extremism Network” offers readers some revealing glimpses into those who are organizing and financing the initiatives that the young Daniel Gallant is involved with.

WeisenfeldPhoto

In the above photo (from Bloomberg) we sees the “rebel” oligarch Lord Arthur George Weidenfeld, President of the Institute for Strategic Dialogue and head of the brain trust that’s designing and financing “philanthropic” organizations like the “Against Violent Extremism Network”. As Bloomberg states, “Lord Arthur George Weidenfeld, also known as Lord Weidenfeld of Chelsea, is the Founder and serves as Chairman of Weidenfeld & Nicolson Ltd., a book publisher, since 1948 [subsidiary of The Orion Publishing Group, Ltd. A.T.]. Lord Weidenfeld is the President of the Institute for Strategic Dialogue. Lord Weidenfeld serves as Director of Hollinger International Publishing Inc. He serves as director of Jerusalem Post. Lord Weidenfeld is also the Member of Advisory Board of the Telegraph Group Limited and Member of European Advisory Board at Investcorp Bank BSC, Private Equity. He served as a director of Hollinger Inc. from September 1993 to 1995.”

Plainly folks there’s obviously no hidden agenda here. No conspiracy. Just a man of the people dedicating his resources to the endless struggle for truth and social justice; a veritable Gandhi of the Rothschild International banking consortium.

Weidenfeld&Merkel&Kissinger copy

This photo also reveals many more of Daniel Gallant’s benefactors. Unfortunately the picture wasn’t accompanied by a caption so I was unable to identify most of them but as one can see we do have German Chancellor Angela Merkel, former Stasi agent from communist east Berlin, standing with a number of apparently highly influential personages including Lord Weidenfeld (behind her) and the infamous war criminal Henry Kissinger to the right of Weidenfeld. Again, just another group of everyday Joes and a Jane deeply concerned about the state of the world and giving of themselves to improve the plight of humanity.

[Editor’s Note: Since publication of this article I have been furnished with the names of the rest of the people in the photo above. This is a picture taken when Kissinger celebrated his 90th birthday. They are, from left to right, the following German politicians and media bosses: former Minister for Economics and Technology and former Vice-chancellor Philipp Roesler, former Foreign Minister Guido Westerwelle, former Foreign Minister Hans Dietrich Genscher, Merkel, Weinfeld, in wheelchair former chancellor Helmut Schmidt, former President von Weizsaecker, Kissinger, former Minister of Finance Peer Steinbrueck, wheelchair Minister of Finance Wolfgang Schaeuble, Chief Executive Officer of German media group Axel Springer SE Mathias Döpfner and Chairman of the supervisory board German media group Axel Springer SE Giuseppe Vita]

Next on Daniel Gallant’s friends list we find Google Ideas. Now everyone knows of course that Google is the most powerful Jewish-owned outfit on the cyber block when it comes to the control and dispensation of information and spyware and, being the overlord of the world’s ability to access truthful information, is also vital to the availability of much of the content now processable on the Internet.

Again, nothing unusual here to be concerned with when it comes to open access and freedom of speech and so on. This fact is easily discerned just from viewing the graphic headers on the Google Ideas website and knowing that Google Ideas “explores how technology can enable people to confront threats in the face of conflict, instability and repression. We connect users, experts and engineers to conduct research and seed new technology-driven initiatives.” Most reassuring indeed for individuals and organizations who may wish to avail themselves of such powerful tools in order to search out all those nasty “neo-Nazis” and “white supremacists” and “violent right wing extremists” who are causing so much “conflict, instability and repression” within Google’s domain.

GoogleIdeas2

GoogleIdeas3

Another “unique and powerful new global” friend of Daniel Gallant’s is Gen Next Foundation. Now here’s a group of rebel anarchists if you ever saw one! All smiles and clean-cut, one can rest assured that they would have only the best of philanthropic intentions for the great unwashed masses.

As their Mission states, “The Gen Next Foundation works to create opportunities and confront challenges that face future generations in the areas of education, economic opportunity, and global security.  We aspire to solve the greatest generational challenges of our time using a unique hybrid of private sector and non-profit business models – called a venture philanthropy model.”

GenNextFoundation1 copy

GenNext2

Here, pictured in the photo above, is yet another radical group of bad-assed, Gen Next Generation “neo-Nazi”, “white supremacist” bounty hunters ready to rock ‘n roll and provide all the necessary backup for young, born-again neo-Zionist “hate” detectives like Daniel Gallant and company. I mean a little Saudi (Jew) money doesn’t hurt the cause now does it? As they state on their site, “When private sector and thought leaders turn their attention, time, and revenue towards supporting game-changing, socially impactful projects, the results can shape the future for millions around the world.

In terms of Gen Next Foundation’s issues they focus on the three that “drive prosperity for future generations: Education, Economic Opportunity, and Global Security.” Get it? “Global Security”. . . “Global Security”. . . “Global Security”. . . “Global Security”. And, speaking of Global Security, the Gen Next Foundation has this to say: “Without a stable, safe environment to grow up in, future generations have far less of a chance to achieve their dreams. Overcoming 21st century challenges demand that our nation’s defense apparatus is the most funded, versatile, well trained, respected, and effective in the world.

We must prioritize diplomacy, and present a positive image of the US in the world. By observing trends in instability, violence, and extremism, both in our own neighborhoods and around the globe, we can better understand the roots of these problems, and develop solutions to solve them through community, technology, and other innovative methods.”

And where do we find the sources for their grand ideas? Let’s see. The World Economic Forum, 2014, the Council on Foreign Relations, 2012, and the Pew Research Center, three outstanding, revolutionary organizations all designed to enhance the quality of life for freedom-living working folks everywhere.

GenNext3

 GenNext4

GenNext5

In terms of their Ventures “Gen Next Foundation incubates and grows ventures that are often high risk, forward looking, and high impact ideas. Our network guides and effectuates each venture with action groups capable of creative ideation, McKinsey style consulting, and world class execution [no doubt along the lines of Israel’s Mossad. A.T.]. We align private sector leaders, government officials, and NGOs in a Venture Philanthropy model to ensure our ventures have the greatest impact.”

Wikipedia tells us, “McKinsey & Company is a multinational management consulting firm with 108 global offices headquartered in New York City in the United States. It conducts qualitative and quantitative analysis in order to evaluate management decisions. Eighty percent of the world’s largest corporations are consulted by the firm and it is considered the most prestigious management consultancy. McKinsey publishes the McKinsey Quarterly, funds the McKinsey Global Institute research organization, publishes reports on management topics and has authored many influential books on management. Its practices of confidentiality, influence on business practices and corporate culture have experienced a polarizing reception.”

Pretty high-falutin language and projects we’re seeing here coming from all of these international orgs and “management consulting firms”who intend to “engineer” our lives for our own good regardless of what we might think. Why it just send shivers of excitement up one’s spine contemplating all the possibilities in store for the lumpen Proles in the days ahead.

GenNext6 PM

And finally, to conclude this brief look at Daniel Gallant’s allies in the hate-hunting, neo-Nazi, white supremacist business, we best take a quick peek at Rehab Studeo.

RehabStudeo

This is yet another “creative technology company” that provides “digital brand experiences that live online, mobile and in the real world, employing a unique creative process based on the principles of hacking to help clients solve business and communication problems using creativity and technology.” Oi veh! Such a deal for all the Daniel’s of the world who just might want to “hack” into all those “neo-Nazi”, “white supremacist” websites or anyone else who they decide is a threat to their global security interests.

Anyway, so much for some of Daniel Gallant’s benefactors. Now let’s take a look at what he’s saying about yours truly and other truth revealers who have dedicated their lives to outing the ongoing machinations of the globalist elites and see what we might find. Then, I’ll try and summarize my thoughts on why this “example of hope, diversity and compassion” behaves as he does and also analyze why his efforts are both misplaced and detrimental to a truthful understanding of how the world operates and ultimately just a cover up and another false flag designed solely to protect the people that are now manufacturing the “reality” which is leading us all further and further into the realm of a one world global dictatorship so lucidly outlined in the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion over a century ago.

Following Part I of Gallant’s general comments on “Hate in the North” he zeroes in on me in Parts II to V by writing the following piece of pro-Zionist propaganda and titling it “Wells, BC, A Home for Hate: Arthur Topham’s Hate and Fear“. Why he chose to include the words “Wells, BC” is open to speculation as I haven’t lived in the town of Wells for forty years and anyone living in the Cariboo who knows me knows that I live in the community of Cottonwood where I’ve resided full time since 1978. The fact that he did use that title came back eventually to bite him in the ass on Facebook and when it did he changed it to Hate in the North (Part II): Arthur Topham.

As well as screwing up on the title he also did the same thing with the url to my website. That, I believe, was intentional on Gallant’s part as he likely didn’t want to give my website any attention other than to provide a pretext for his slander and vilification that it provides to his readership (assuming of course that he has readers. Judging from the number of comments at the end of each of these 5-Part diatribes it doesn’t appear to be many). The addition of “/blog/” to the url to radicalpress.com was an easy way to throw readers off.

Also, it ought to be noted that I had to remove the urls to the three news articles that Gallant posts on his site. Why? Because there is a court order prohibiting me from publishing anything that contains the names of the two traitorous Zionist sycophant sayanim who filed the complaints against me and this included even links to other publications that reveal their names. It’s all justified of course by saying that they are being somehow put “in danger” if I should mention them. It could be misconstrued as a “threat” even. Heaven forbid! Doesn’t matter that all the court documents display their names and either of these entities are known across the country for all their other devious deeds over the past decade and longer and if anyone was to google my name and the charges brought against me that they could easily find out who they are. It’s called Zionese and is a perverse form of legalese.

Here, then, is Gallant’s assessment of myself:

Hate in the North (Part II): Arthur Topham

ATPub+

Quesnel BC’s own white supremacist Arthur Topham:
http://www.radicalpress.com/blog/ real link is: http://www.radicalpress.com/

News articles relating to Arthur Topham:

http://news.nationalpost.com/.… [court order prohibiting publication]
http://www.torontosun.com/.… [court order prohibiting publication]
http://anti-racistcanada.blogspot.ca/.… [court order prohibiting publication]

This local arrest is a very important event. It provides the north with the opportunity to say that we will not tolerate violent extremism in northern BC. No assaults, whether verbal or physical should be encouraged or even permitted. Since I have moved to Prince George four years ago, I have linked the promotion of hate, youth recruitment into hate groups, racist vandalism, and violent extremism that includes explosives/bombs. This is an opportunity for Prince George and the northern region to state the claim that violent extremism is not welcome in our communities.

The online white supremacist chatter is currently running wild. Quesnel, BC, is now on the map as a white supremacist location. Arthur Topham is reported to have been arrested and his house searched by RCMP while hate crimes charges have reportedly been laid. White supremacist websites and discussion forums are expressing support and outrage about Topham’s arrest. Already the defense of free speech is being advocated by Paul Fromm and of course lawyer Doug Christie. This is not the first time Arthur Topham has been the center of online white supremacist discourse. In 2009, Human Rights complaints were lodged against him. The complaints were dismissed due to complex legal issues. However, Topham has now been caught with his ‘cyber-pants down’. It is claimed by Paul Fromm that Doug Christie will be representing Arthur Topham.

If asked, most people would not think that violent extremism is present in the northern part of British Columbia. However, with the actions of several racist-right-wing skinheads and white supremacists the north is seemingly becoming plagued by extremists, just like anywhere else in Canada.

————

So, apart from his first two faux pas, our “example of hope, diversity and compassion” Mr. Daniel Gallant then violates the very foundation of justice as it exists in both natural law and the laws of Canada by automatically assuming I am somehow guilty of the alleged crime of “promoting hate” and goes off on his own ramblings about all the hateful things he’s discovered in the north after living here for the past four years. In Daniel’s guilt-ridden fantasy world where demons run rampant, suddenly the “online white supremacist chatter is currently running wild. Quesnel (formerly Wells), BC, is now on the map as a white supremacist location . . . White supremacist websites and discussion forums are expressing support and outrage about Topham’s arrest” (although none of them are referenced in the article). Paul Fromm and Doug Christie are immediately highlighted and, by association, linked to the alleged “White supremacist websites and discussion forums.”

Next, Gallant, missing his target by only three years, tells readers that I had already been “caught with [my] ‘cyber-pants down’” back in 2009 when a Human Rights complaint was filed against me but that it had been “dismissed due to complex legal issues.” The truth of course is that the Section 13 complaint was filed back in 2007 and wasn’t stayed until June 26th, 2014 when Section 13 was officially repealed by the federal government a year and a half after Gallant wrote his little hate propaganda piece. So much for referencing his work with factual information.

Part III of Gallant’s pentagon of pathetic Zionist propaganda, titled “Ideological Glance” is another feeble and fruitless attempt to vilify the likes of former columnist for the North Shore News in Vancouver, B.C. Doug Collins; to refute the truth found in the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion; to malign James Keegstra and and Ernst Zundel; and to defend the greatest hoax of the 20th century, i.e., the lie that 6 million Jews were gassed and fried in ovens in German work camps during WWII.

DOUG COLLINS PATRIOT

Part IV of Gallant’s mini-series on Machiavellian methods for maligning the enemies of Zion titled “Perversion of Rights” consists of another five paragraphs of slurs, half-truths, outright lies and defamation of both Paul Fromm and Douglas Christie that culminate in accusations of pre-meditated intent on the part of these two Canadian patriots to promote “genocide, atrocity and harm to those who are implicated in the ‘Zionist conspiracy’; which includes ‘race-mixers’, ‘race-traitors’ and most citizens.”

Part V titled “White Lies” is, like all of the other parts, a scrambled, incoherent, convoluted and pathetic attempt to present a hodge podge of lies, assumptions and worn-out Zionist cliches as an intelligent appraisal of Gallant’s misguided belief that anyone who disagrees with the Jewish interpretation of history must, automatically, be labeled either a “neo-Nazi” or a “white supremacist” and a “hater”. I will quote in full the two paragraphs that comprise this final segment of Gallant’s smear campaign against myself and my associates so that readers can see for themselves how transparent, ridiculous, puerile and psychotic this individual’s reasoning truly is. Pay particular attention to the sentence in bold where the writer attempts to wax eloquent on the subject of eugenics.

“In addition to the conspiracy oriented backbone of the white supremacist worldview there is another likewise problematic misconception. This is the notion of racial purity and the links biology has to culture. Eugenics based science/theory, which is archaic in its development, and the belief that biological determinism is one of the crux of white supremacist idealism speaks to the lens of these pseudo-intellectual lenses. We as a collective society now understand that race and biology do not determine socialization. Socio-cultural dynamics which include intelligence, deviance and criminality are referenced throughout much of the right-wing doctrine as being linked directly to physiology and biology. This biologically determined belief structure is not only archaic, but de-bunked as a science. As indicated by UNBC professor and scholar Michelle Bouchard race is a social construct and what people typically refer to as ‘race’ does not actually exist genetically in a solidified and quantitative manner.

Loose connections are the root of white supremacist doctrine and propaganda. Extremists from the right wing agenda, like Arthur Topham, regurgitate distasteful, hurtful and violent messages, which are rooted in half-baked pseudo-intellectualism. These individuals are not tucked away into the corners of society and hidden away. They work in your schools, courtrooms, universities and construction sites. It is my goal to include, in this blog, insight into who some of these people are; and what they are up to. It is my hope to inform those from the extreme-far-right, that there is a way out of the misconceptions of their indoctrination; all while promoting compassion and solidarity amongst our collective human experience in order to decrease the amount of abuse and oppression that occurs in our country, our cities, our streets, our institutions, our homes and most importantly in our minds.”

Okay. That more or less summarizes my comments on Gallant’s little 5-pack attack piece on myself, RadicalPress.com and friends and associates of freedom. It’s so redundant and oh so reminiscent for truth revealers everywhere of the stereotypical, nauseating ADL hit pieces that gush forth incessantly from the dark and dank underground recesses of B’nai Brith’s cesspool of slander and calumny, the Anti-Defamation League.

What my research of Gallant’s sites tells me (coupled with a few written exchanges on Facebook back in 2013) is that his behaviour, in light of his past trauma, explains to a great degree how the outcome of such a life provides the perfect breeding ground for New World Order psychopaths like the Zionist Jews who are always vigilant when it comes to seeking out traumatized individuals who can then be mind-controlled into performing the type of tasks that Daniel Gallant is now undertaking and who can then provide the necessary feigned sympathy and empathy followed by encouragement and training and public exposure and positive attention in order to gain a recruit who will then serve their interests and be a willing, goyim spokesperson for their NWO agenda.

Enter Joey Only – rebel anarchist and purveyor of Zionist Jew myths

Ignorance copy 2

Now like many minds shaped by trauma and pain Daniel Gallant is persistent in his efforts to expose those who his “demons” tell him are “neo-Nazis” and “white supremacists” and through such persistence he eventually was able to capture the attention of another young and foolish lad and a newcomer to the small town of Wells which has been an integral part of the local Cariboo social and cultural network for decades.

Wells,BC

Joey Only might properly be called a reluctant musician and singer/songwriter if one was to take to heart his autobiographical writings found at https://joeyonly.wordpress.com/. An easterner who eventually migrated out west in the fall of 2002 Joey, like his newly acquired friend and protege Daniel Gallant, also spend time in East Vancouver, Daniel beating up drunks and people of colour and Joey playing gigs in and around Vancouver’s “Left” music scene trying to build up a reputation as a ‘the radical folk singer’.

Eventually, after a number of years working with the Marxist-Leninist crowd in Vancouver, Joey became disenchanted and decided to head north to the Yukon where he set up shop in the local bars of Whitehorse there forming his “Outlaw Band” in the spring of 2006. Joey and his band worked hard to establish a reputation and earn a living and in the process he eventually morphed into a more western-style, frontier-type, back to the country (punk?) image. After a few years on the road Joey quit the music scene and in 2009, as he says, “due to personal disillusionment, moved to Wells took it easy, started a family and soon got a brand new ass kicking band together.”

Screen Shot 2015-03-20 at 6.12.19 PM

Like his newly acquired side-kick Daniel Gallant, Joey appears to be a rather introspective type; a poet and songwriter; one of the common folk and, professedly, a fierce opponent of any and all forms of injustice. Politically he espouses what he believes to be an anarchist perspective. In his younger years it appears he was also active in the Christian church. All fine and good.

Now around the end of February, Joey began suffering from a northern malady that we in the area refer to as “cabin fever blues”which is common throughout the Cariboo and other wintery type regions of the world where the short days and minimal sunlight tend to bring a person down. It was around this same period of darkness and depression that Daniel Gallant’s serpentine efforts on behalf of his Zionist taskmasters to work his venom into Joey’s mind finally had the desired effect. The result was Joey Only decided that he too had to do something about that “neo-Nazi”, “white supremacist” Arthur Topham, the “racist, hate-mongering anti-Semitic Jew-hater” who was giving Joey’s new town of Wells, a bad reputation as “A Home for Hate” and so on February 24th, 2015 he posted the following hit piece on his Facebook page:

Joey Onley
February 24 at 3:03pm

“So I gotta open up this can of worms…a friend of mine told me today they were scared to come to Wells because they read this article posted below some time ago and then shared it with me. I have to say I love this town so much that I can’t stand to see something like this. So I appreciate what Daniel Gallant, the author, is trying to do in exposing a neo-Nazi peice[sic] of alcoholic trash like Arthur Topham but I can’t approve of it as it’s unfactual and unfair. I want the article removed!
Arthur Topham doesn’t live in Wells and I don’t think anyone in this town would have any use for the pro-Hitler crap that spews from his rotten head. He lives the better part of an hour west of us and most people here have never heard of his name. I love this town and I believe we are a very progressive artistic, sensible and inclusive community, probably the shining light in the north. It hurts me to think that someone I care about would be afraid to visit me because they got the impression we are some kind of neo-nazi flag waving town.
If you feel so moved to help defend our towns reputation against such spurious accusations please do two things. Read this article and post a comment to Daniel explaining why you don’t believe it’s fair to muddy our little mountain towns name…and secondly when you see Arthur Topham in the liqour store remind him he’s a peice[sic] of shit nazi scumbag who our grandfathers would have shot…so not to bother visiting Wells. When insane neo-nazi rantings from someone we don’t even know come back to shame our town I get a different kind of angry as we are nothing like this. I never met this Arthur guy but if I recognize him in town I promise I won’t mence[sic] words in expressing my dissaproval[sic]!
Now let me post in the comments some of Arthur Tophams horrific works. This stuff makes me want to puke.”

Apart from the sudden realization that I was an “alcoholic” the rest of Joey’s gush of slanderous disparagement was typical of the anti-racist, brain-dead zombies who the Zionists manage to sway in one way or another to perform their malicious smear campaigns for them.

OnlyAccuser

Three days later, he posted the following:

Joey Onley
February 27 at 5:22pm

“Receiving threats and harrassment from Arthur Tophams camp this afternoon. It is to be expected. I’m aware my physical safety is at risk for speaking out against local white supremacists.”

More lies. Having thus made his initial false accusations Only then proceeded to cried wolf about me making threats to him in order to give the impression to his friends (many of whom were my “friends” and my wife’s “friends” as well) that on top of being all those terrible things that Daniel Gallant had stated about me I was also a dangerous man who was now threatening him (he didn’t elaborate on what type of threat it was) with some form of violence in retaliation for Only having “outed” me.

The immediate effect of course was that my family was deeply incensed by his slanderous actions and crude, foul-mouthed insults and that he would have the chutzpah to pull off such a cheap stunt before people in our own local community who we had known and respected for decades.

As for all of our Facebook “friends” who were privy to Only’s remarks none of them (to my knowledge) displayed the courage or strength of character to speak up on my behalf or my wife’s behalf in the comment section below his post and chastise him for his callous and uncalled for behaviour. In that sense, I suppose, Joey’s outburst of lies about me was a good thing in that it exposed to the Facebook world of make-believe “friends” the depth of sincerity of those who had previously feigned a cordial countenance toward us in the past and once again reconfirmed the old adage “with friends like that who needs enemies”.

Summary

Thus one sees how the effect of the Daniel Gallants of the world serve the power elite who depend upon their Zionized zombies to do their dirty work for them by spreading lies and gossip that in turn facilitate greater and greater dissension among those who are already mentally taxed by the volume and magnitude of deception that has permeated the mindset of the younger generations.

The Daniel Gallants and the Joey Onlys of the world are, in many ways, caught between two worlds. Having been subjected all their lives to endless Zionist propaganda promulgated by the Jew-controlled media since 1933 their mental hard drive or database has been so thoroughly infected by the duplicitous virus of Zionist “Left” chicanery that it becomes virtually impossible (or inconceivable) for them to understand how their cultural and intellectual mindset has been so saturated with meme after meme of Germanophobic hate-mongering that by the time they’ve reached adulthood their minds are already captive making them ripe for further mind-control and manipulation as soon as they dare venture into that great arena for social change – politics and political activism.

The case of Daniel Gallant is rather unique in some respects. His early life of trauma is a classic example of the type of MK-Ultra tactics that former victim of the CIA’s “Project Monarch” mind-control operation, Kathy O’Brien describes in her 1995 book TRANCE FORMATION of AMERICA. Gallant, now that he’s fallen into the hands of the same manipulators his work becomes all the more relevant in terms of its planned objectives which are to dispense deception for the greater good of Israel and the Zionist agenda.

TranceformO'brienFinal 2

As I was finishing off this article I revisited Joey Only’s Facebook page to see if anything had changed and while scrolling down his page realized that he had deleted his February 24 post. Fortunately I had copied and saved all the relevant information. Was it remorse that moved him to take it down? Was it the fact that others had approached him off Facebook and told him that he was way off track in making such outlandish statements about someone they had know for years? Was it because Only actually took the time to investigate further who I really was? Or was it for some other unknown reason? Possibly he realized what a fool he’d made of himself and didn’t want the post to stand as reminder. Only Only knows why and thus far he hasn’t had the honesty or integrity to speak about it. It needs to be noted though that he still has the post up where he accuses me of harassing and threatening him so whatever his motives were in removing the post they remain suspect.

In a second article related to Daniel Gallant I will focus more directly on his accusations that I’m a “neo-Nazi” and a “white supremacist”. There I hope to be able to provide sufficient evidence to show that his deliberate smear campaign has no substance whatsoever and all he is doing is the acting as a sayan for the state of Israel and the Rothschild Zionist criminal cartel.

——

THE ZUNDEL TRIAL & FREE SPEECH By Douglas Christie, B.A., L.L.B.

 

ZundelTrial&FreeSpeechDC800

THE ZUNDEL TRIAL & FREE SPEECH
By Douglas Christie, B.A., L.L.B.
February 25, 1985

dchristie2

DOUGLAS CHRISTIE, B.A., L.L.B.
__________________________________________________________

[EDITOR’S NOTE: In the Introduction to this small booklet published by C-FAR back in 1985, then President of the Canadian Association for Free Expression, Daryl Reside, wrote:

“In this booklet, C-FAR’s Canadian Issues Series is publishing excerpts from defence lawyer Doug Christie’s spirited summation to the jury at the Ernst Zundel trial. This summation was delivered February 25, 1985.

Zundel had been charged under Section 177 of the Criminal Code for having knowingly published false news that was likely to be injurious to the public good. In his ringing defence, Christie seeks to establish: 1) that credible reasons existed for much of what Zundel published; that is, he had justification and arguments for his point of view; 2) that he sincerely believed what he wrote and, therefore, did not knowingly publish falsehoods; and 3) that  a diversity of opinions, however controversial they may be, is vital to a democracy and in no way harms the public good. Threading its way throughout the entire summation is Christie’s passionate view that, right or wrong, a man must be permitted to search for the truth and express his point of view.

It is this fierce commitment to principle and to liberty that makes this summation an important historical document…. It should also be noted that Zundel nowhere advocated illegal or violent actions in the two pamphlets in which he was accused of violating Section 177.”

It is now going on 25 years, a quarter of a century, since Doug Christie gave this summation to the jury in February of 1985. In the interim period the forces of censorship and repression have been successful in punishing Ernst Zundel to the max and he now sits in a dungeon in Zionist-occupied Germany and has been jailed for over six years already for having committed the gravest crime of the 20th Century: Speaking the truth.

Obviously the battle to end censorship is far from over. In my own case with these same Zionist Jew forces working through B’nai Brith Canada’s League for “Human Rights”, we see their relentless and calculated designs continuing to unfold before the public’s now awakening eyes. The war for freedom of speech continues.]

DOUG CHRISTIE’S SUMMATION TO THE JURY IN 1985

ErnstZVictim

Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, it’s my role as counsel, to address you now and speak to you about the position of the defence. My first observation is that probably never before in the history of your country, have twelve people had to grapple with a more all-encompassing and serious issue than you will have to deal with. When you have finished your deliberations, in all probability your country will be made different, for as long as you and I will live, by the decision that you will make here about the most serious issues that confront any citizen in a free society.

You have spent seven weeks examining the evidence in one of the most wide-scoped cases in the history of Canadian jurisprudence. I said at the beginning, and I repeat to you now, that this is a case that should never have been before a court of law in a free society because it is an issue upon which courts will have no end of difficulty in addressing and dealing with. If you have a clear understanding of the role of freedom in a free society, this may never have to happen again, because a clear indication that we permit and tolerate debate and points of view we may not agree with from a jury of twelve ordinary citizens will be the strongest indication to every politician in this country that we are not subject to the pressures of groups dictating ideas and determining how other people will think, act, and speak.

I suggest to you now that what you have heard in these seven weeks is a lot more information on the subject of the book, Did Six Million Really Die?, than you or I might ever have thought at first was likely to occur. I suggest that we have all learned something in this process. Tolerance, is indeed, one of the things that you have learned by hearing another side to a point that we always thought was so clear and so simple. But to everything we know in life, there are two sides, and many more quite often, and nobody, no matter how well informed or how expert, has all the truth, or ever will.

 

tazebook_dees-1 copy

It shouldn’t be for the law to determine the extent of debate in a free society. It shouldn’t be forced upon judges and courts to decide what is the truth about some historical belief. It’s nobody’s fault in this room that we are here. It is the duty of every one of us to do our duty as we are, lawyers, judges, jurors, but really it was a wrong political decision to bring before you and me the duty to examine history 40 years old to determine where the truth lies. It is a question that never should have been here. But having been placed in this position, we must deal with it, and we must deal with it to preserve important values in our society.

The first and most important value is the freedom to debate, the freedom to think, the freedom to speak and the freedom to disagree. This prosecution, has already had a very serious effect on those freedoms. If it were to result in a conviction, I suggest to you that a process of witch-hunting would begin in our society where everyone who had a grievance against anyone else would say “Uh-huh, you are false, and I’ll take you or pressure somebody else to take you to court and force you to defend yourself.” Even though our society says, as it always has, in this and every other charge, the burden’s on the Crown, the burden to prove every ingredient is on the Crown, the burden to prove that the thing is false is on the Crown, where does the accused stand? He’s here. He’s been here like you, at his own expense for seven weeks and whatever may become of this case, he’s already paid a very high price for the belief that he had the right to speak what he believed to be the truth.

Who could deny that he believed it to be the truth? In fact, who can prove it wasn’t the truth? If this society cherishes freedom, as men and women in the past have, then you and I must very clearly state that truth can stand on its own. In a free society we have no better protection, for my opinion and yours, than that you should be free to express yourself and I should be free to express myself, and no court need decide who’s right and who’s wrong.

Is that going to be a danger to you and me? Error, if there is such, in my opinion or yours is best determined when you and I talk freely to one another, and you and I can then debate and hear from each other many sources of information which couldn’t be produced in a court of law. How many of our opinions could stand up to seven weeks of scrutiny? How much of anything you have ever written or I’ve ever written could be analyzed line by line for seven weeks, phrase by phrase, with experts from all over the world, and found to be true? There will be errors in anything you or I believe, and thank God for it. We are, none of us, perfect. But in the thesis Did Six Million Really Die? there is a substantial point of view, a reasonable argument found upon fact, that many will reject, but many are free to reject. Who denies Dr. Hilberg the right to publish his views? Who denies that he should be free to say there was a Hitler order to exterminate Jews? Not my client; not me; nobody in society denies him that right. Who denies anyone the right to publish their views? Well, it’s the position of my client that he’s obliged to justify his publication. And I suggest he has.

I’d like to refer to something Dr. Hilberg said in his book, and I asked him about it. He said, “Basically, we are dealing with two of Hitler’s decisions. One order was given in the spring of 1941, during the planning of the invasion of the U.S.S.R.; it provided that small units of the S.S. and police be dispatched to Soviet territory, where they were to move from town to town to kill all Jewish inhabitants on the spot. This method may be called the “mobile killing operations.” Shortly after the mobile operations had begun in the occupied Soviet territories, Hitler handed down his second order. That decision doomed the rest of European Jewry. Unlike the Russian Jews, who were overtaken by mobile units, the Jewish population of Central, Western, and South Eastern Europe was transported to killing centres.”

Through all the trial and all the arguments and all the discussion, I have yet to see one single piece of evidence of either of those two Hitler orders. If they exist, why can’t we see them? No footnote, no identification of source. We have a statement of very significant fact, without a single supporting document here in that book, or there on that stand from a learned and distinguished author.

Am I saying he has no right to his views? Of course not. Am I saying that I should be able to debate his views and disagree with his views? I certainly suggest that ought to be your right, my right, and the right of every thinking person. You see, there is an example. If I were to put Dr. Hilberg or any other person in the position of the accused and say, “All right, justify that,” how would he? We all hold opinions that at times we would have a difficult job justifying. But, so what? Is it not possible for people to disagree and be free to disagree when they themselves are not absolutely certain they’re right? Have we come to the stage in society where tolerance is so limited that we must prosecute those whose views we find disagreeable?

In this trial, I often wondered and I suggest, so should you, why all this. Why? For a little booklet that published a point of view which some people reject and other people believe? Why? Well, only in the last few hours of this trial did I really begin to see the reason why. It had nothing to do with Did Six Million Really Die?; very little to do with The West, War and Islam, a lot to do with Mr. Zundel and his views. Was he a racist? Was he a lover of Hitler? Was he perhaps a neo-Nazi, as so often we’ve been told? What difference would that really make anyway? If it was alleged that he had some views of a Communist nature, so what? We tolerate those views. In a newsletter complaining about what had happened to 2,000 friends and supporters and subscribers of his newsletter, many of them old, when their homes were entered in West Germany, with warrants in the middle of the night, he was angry. So, out of 25 years of his writing letters, they found a sentence which implied some deep anger and the resort to violence. Never once has there been a suggestion of any violence from Mr. Zundel at all. No suggestion he ever owned or had or would have had a gun. None of what is suggested. But you know who he actually quoted and paraphrased? You know it was the man who said, “All legal power comes out of the barrel of a gun.” That was – if you know history – Mao Tse-tung, a man who was eulogized in the Parliament of Canada upon his death. And yet, Mr. Zundel used it, and is cross-examined as to its deep-seated significance, as if he had some sinister intent.

I began to see, as I suggest you should, that the real reason for this prosecution was his views. If any of us is subjected to that kind of scrutiny, it will mean that freedom really ceases to have any meaning. You will be free to agree but not free to disagree. That’s the kind of society which will result if a conviction can be founded upon a prosecution of this kind.

I suggest that you don’t have to believe what it says in Did Six Million Really Die?, but you probably have good reason to. There’s a lot of truth in that pamphlet which deserves to be considered by rational men and women all over the world, not because they’re academics, but because they’re thinking human beings and they want to hear different points of view. What are we, lobotomized idiots, that we only have to accept the point of view of the “majority”? Or are we free, should we be free, to think of views that are not majority views?

How do you think change occurs in society? Do you think the whole of society decides, “Oh, we were wrong about the world being flat,” and all of a sudden, bang, the whole world decides, “Oh, it’s round now.”? Ask Galileo how difficult that was. In his time, he was a heretic, his views were totally contrary to 99% of the population. But, who was right?

Now, change has to occur in everybody’s thinking from time to time. Everybody grows. I’ve learned something here; you’ve learned something here; we’re all growing. And it’s in the process of hearing other points of view that we grow. But if we decide that somebody’s point of view ought not to be heard because someone else says it’s false, we’ve terminated all significant discussion, because significant points of view are always regarded as false by somebody, and if they’re controversial, my goodness, they create lots of heat, more heat often than light. So, if we are going to keep our children and grandchildren, and for the future of our country the possibility of progress and the possibility of exchanging ideas in a free society, we’d better respect the rights of others who honestly believe that they are right, even though we many think they’re wrong.

I don’t suggest for one moment that you or I have any right to determine from the evidence before you that Mr. Zundel is wrong. I would say to you that the case is unproven as to falsehood. Unproven. In Scottish law there is guilty, not guilty, or unproven. Well, you don’t have that verdict here, but it’s an interesting point by analogy, because in the case at bar it hasn’t been proven beyond reasonable doubt that there’s anything false about Did Six Million Really Die?, not a word. It’s opinion.

Dr. Hilberg says: “Oh, I think it’s all misquotes and half truth and misconceptions.” That’s his view. I respect his right to his view. But he hasn’t proven any of that. He says, “I’ve read documents for years.” What documents did he produce? I didn’t see any. Who produced documents? Who produced books? Who produced maps? Who produced photographs? The defendant. He comes before you because he believes what he says is the truth and he wants to prove it to you. Why else would he waste a hundred thousand of his dollars and seven weeks of his life? Why do you think that he does all of this? Because he believes in the truth of what he says. He believes in it so passionately because he loves his nation. Is that a sin? He didn’t say he hated anybody. He didn’t say a word against anybody when he was on the stand. He was attacked. He said that he loved his race. He said, “I love my children, but that doesn’t mean I hate other people’s children.” Is there something wrong with that? If our society is to be scrupulous about what other people’s opinions are, who among us will be safe? If I or you were to have to reveal all our opinions on the stand, how many of them could withstand public scrutiny? If the right decision is made here, seven weeks will have been well spent in that never again will someone have to defend his position in a court of law on a statement of opinion.

You don’t have to share all of Mr. Zundel’s opinions. He has a right to his; you have a right to yours. He’s not questioning your right to yours. But there is a power that is questioning his right to his, and you are the only hope for the freedom of citizens to hold views that disagree with others. And if you can’t hold views that disagree in a free society, what is there? There are two things. If you can’t have freedom to disagree, then there’s either violence, or there is silence, neither of which is traditional in our country, neither of which is necessary in the future. Our country has been a peaceful country because we have tolerated points of view with which you and I might not agree, not because we have some hygienic method of extracting and eliminating bad views. That’s never been done before, and it should not be done now, and it should never be done again.

But there is a force in our society that wants that to happen. If there’s a means to stop it from carrying on and creating a situation where everybody has to stand before courts and justify themselves to their neighbours, we must find it.

You twelve people have more power in your hands for good or evil than any other twelve people I have ever met, and thank God for the right that you should be free today to defend freedom tomorrow, to make freedom a real thing. You or I have never really known that kind of power before, because we’ve never been put in this position before. A clear answer from you, without doubt, without fear, without malice, will put an end to a process which, if it continues, will lead us to the destruction of all freedom in society.

In his brochure Did Six Million Really Die?, Ernst Zundel presents a thesis, a thesis that men have paid a very high price for believing. No witness for the Crown needs fear for his job, for his security, for his family, but is that true for the defence? Then, why are the defence witnesses here? They are here because they love the truth and believe in what they say, and already I can tell you that the prices are being paid. So much for freedom in society, that men and women have to fight to get into courtrooms to give their evidence, to testify under fear. Well, with the right decision from you, that fear will be diminished. What little we know as ordinary citizens about communist societies indicates that where there is an official truth, where there is a state religion or belief, people become more and more afraid to speak. That should not happen here. There is what Orwell referred to as an official truth in some societies. Is that what you wish for your society? You will have more power to answer that question today than any other twelve people in our society so far. With a clear answer to that question, you will do some service to your descendants in the preservation of their rights.

I don’t know how many of you have controversial views. Maybe none. But will your children have none? Would you like to have the right to their opinions? That’s a question you too will answer.

The booklet Did Six Million Really Die? is more important for German people than it is maybe for others, because there is a real guilt daily inculcated against German people in the media every time they look at the war. You know most of us are from a background on the Allied side, I think, and so when we have Veteran’s Days, we love our country, we love our people who sacrificed for it. But what of the Germans? Are they always to bear the label of the villains? You see, they had an interest in looking into this question. There are so many people in our society who come from that background who desire to know the truth and don’t believe everything they have been told. They inquire. They have a motive. They indeed have a reason, more than you and I perhaps, to inquire, and their views may be in diametric opposition to yours. But if they have some truth let them tell it. Let them reason. Let the public decide whether they are right or wrong. Let not the courts make a decision. Let not people be forced to justify themselves in this way, but let the public decide. That’s all Mr. Zundel has asked for and that’s all anyone has a right to I suggest and it isn’t too much of a right for anyone to desire.

The German people have been portrayed for forty years in the role of the butchers of six million. Oh, I’m aware that in this case there were repeated efforts to distinguish between Germans and Nazis, but is that really the way they’re portrayed? Is that distinction always kept? Is it justified to believe what we have been told so often? You have heard some reasons which prove that the story of the six million is not correct. Those reasons are given to you by sincere, honest individuals who have done diligent research.

You have heard the evidence of many witnesses and I’d like to briefly capsulize some of the significant things about their evidence. You remember Arnold Freedman. He was transported in cattle cars. He constantly smelled the smoke in Birkenau and saw it belching from chimneys. I want you to consider a very significant question which has troubled me. To create belching chimneys, day in and day out, twenty-four hours a day, seven days a week for weeks on end, one needs coal or coke, large quantities of coal or coke. I’ve heard all the evidence, as you have, of the process of unloading the people into the concentration camps. Why would all those people be unloaded by the helpless prisoners like Dr. Vrba, and the coal be unloaded by the S.S.? Keep in mind, in the days of 1940 to 44, we didn’t have backhoes, right? We didn’t have caterpillars unloading these trucks, coal cars. Everything was apparently done by hand. Well, you know, it makes me very, very interested, to put it mildly, that all this smoke and burning chimneys and flames shooting forth should occur with nobody unloading coke trains. Did you hear anybody talk of unloading coke trains? I didn’t?

To question should never be anti-anything. Why should it be? To think is not against anybody. To reason, to question, is the free right of a thinking human being. So I wonder, where does all this right to think go, if we can’t ask the question: where were the coke trains? Where was the coal?

The evidence of Mr. Zundel was that 80 pounds of coal is necessary to cremate a human body. The amount of coal to turn a human body into ashes is a morbid subject, of course, but it doesn’t change. The laws of physics don’t change for the Germans, for the Nazis, for the Jews, or anybody; they’re all the same, the laws of physics. Now, 80 pounds of coal or coke for 1,765,000 people is nearly a hundred and sixty million pounds of coke. Where does all this come from? Nobody bothers to answer that, but they say that Did Six Million Really Die? is false.

How is that question false? How is questioning anything false? Why should the editorial opinions of our writers be any different than Mr. Zundel’s? How many editorials contain false news every day? How many newspaper stories, how many books, how many movies? What are we doing here? We’re crucifying one man’s opinion because they say he is not a nice man, when every day in all of our society there’s a thousand misquotes, misstatements. Well, what’s the difference? I’ll tell you what the difference is. This man has no political power and big newspapers and big television stations and big radio stations and big politicians do. That’s the difference.

When John Turner quotes Brian Mulroney, do you think he does it to approve of him? Do you think they quote each other out of context because they wish to point out the inconsistencies of their opponent? The Crown, in his analysis, will no doubt say there are statements in Did Six Million Really Die? that are out of context, that the Red Cross did not say there was no extermination when they wrote their report, but it is true they said there was no extermination during the war, when they were in the camps. They don’t even produce for you a shred of evidence of a gas chamber, but they say 1,765,000 people died by going between two buildings. Remember Dr. Vrba’s evidence? Well, how do you accomplish that without a gas chamber? What, do they disappear and they’re all shot? No, you have to justify the claim that millions died; you have to have gas chambers and there’s no evidence to support them.

Now the defence has tried to show that the alleged gas chambers at Auschwitz seen today, are impossibilities, scientific impossibilities. We have called evidence, witness after witness, to show they have tried to find the bottom of this story, and they have found nothing that makes sense to their experience. That’s pretty significant stuff. That’s pretty important analysis. Look what Dr. Faurisson has paid for his inquiries. He’s been beaten; he’s been beaten while he talked; he’s been subjected to quite a bit of ridicule; but does anyone deny the sincerity or honesty of his inquiry or his intelligence or his detailed analysis of what documents there are? I suggest not.

bloodyfourisson

Prof. Fourisson – beaten
by Zionist thugs in 1989
__________________________

People want the right to ask these questions, and there are some people who don’t want anyone to have the right to broadcast what they find, and I would consider that, I suggest you should, a very suspicious situation. When any group of people wants to silence an individual, you’d better ask why. Maybe it’s a good thing, maybe it’s beneficial to social tolerance that we should ask these questions. Maybe it’s time to do that now. Maybe the way to peace is not through silence and coercion on these matters but through open discussion. How will that change the world? Maybe it will be a better world when we can look at ourselves more honestly in the cold light of reason rather than the heated passions of a war just ended.

That’s what revisionism is all about. After the First World War, there were many revisionists, many people who said: “Well, we really don’t have all the answers on our side.” We used propaganda. We told people that Germans killed Belgian babies and boiled cadavers to make soap. That’s not a Second World War story at all. If we want peace there must be freedom to discuss whether or not the morality was all on one side. That’s really the social effect of the booklet Did Six Million Really Die?. You don’t have to accept it. To see even that it puts some of the things that happened after the Second World War in a different context, would be a redeeming value in itself, but the booklet has a great deal more. It has truth, a lot of truth. It’s for you to decide, for the public, indeed, too, to decide how much truth, measured, as they ought to, with their right to read everybody else’s opinion.

Error needs the support of government; truth stands on its own. In fact, what is occurring here, is the endeavor to silence one opinion, one side of the argument. “But the world is no more justified in silencing the opinion of one man than that one man would be if he had the power to in silencing all the world,” these words of John Stuart Mill are as true today as when he spoke them. Do we have to learn the same lessons all over again, every generation? Do we never entrench and understand from one generation to the next the right to differ? Do we always have to re-fight these battles time and again? I guess we do. I guess it’s always going to be a struggle to have a different point of view, but I’ll tell you, it has always been the history of Man that good men and women have valued freedom, sometimes to the extent that they would risk their lives to save it, and if anything could be done to honour the memory of men and women who died in war for the sake of freedom, it would be to recognize that freedom now, for someone whose opinions they might not have agreed with. If we have a duty to admit a fact about ourselves, it’s that we don’t have all the answers.

Let our society, from the date of your verdict, be known for the safety with which we tolerate divergent views and opinions, when truth is left free to combat error in the open arena of a free society unfettered by the heavy hand of the state. That is a simple statement of principle. I guess it is necessary for you and I once again to make the little sacrifice that you and I have to be here and fight for that principle all over again. Thank God no one was really hurt. Thank God that we can do this in a rational context with respect for each other, with understanding, with charity for our many errors, without having to go to war, to discuss controversies. Maybe there’s progress, but there won’t be if everybody who wishes to bring forward a controversial view will have to do so in a court at their own expense. If you convict, that process will have only just begun, because in society there will always be people who would like to put their enemy right there in the defendant’s chair. That’s where a lot of people would like to see somebody they disagree with, right there. If you convict, I can say to you that’s a very likely situation. There are some rather nasty politicians who would like to put their opponents right there, and if we follow down the road that this prosecution will lead, if there is a conviction, there will be no stopping those types of politicians who wish to put their opponents right there. Then where will we be? Don’t think that they wouldn’t have the power, because they can find it. There are pressure groups today who can find that power.

The book-burnings by the Nazis were wrong, but what’s going on here? A book’s on trial, two books, if you like, pamphlets, tracts, if like. But every day in our society people say a lot more controversial dubious things than are written there. Why are these people so afraid of such a little book? If it was false, would they be afraid?

You’ve heard a witness, Doug Collins. He’s been a journalist for 35 years, and he says there’s the power of Zionists in the media. Do you really need some proof of that? How many publications today criticize Israel very strenuously? Is that the kind of society you want, where one view is the only legitimate view? The smear word of anti-Semitism is so easy to put upon anyone and so difficult to disabuse oneself of once you are labeled. Is criticism of Israel or the point of view of Jews any more evil than the criticism of Americans or the criticism of British or the criticism of French points of view? Why should it be?

It’s my submission to you, that maybe the basis of the Crown’s attack, is that the accused has chosen to criticize a very obviously Jewish belief. Now, I don’t question the right of any group, Jews, Gentiles, Greeks, whomever, to hold whatever views, but why deny Ernst Zundel the same right? And then let the public decide, as every time they will, between whom they believe and whom they don’t believe.

The future of the right to hold beliefs is at stake because the truth is never self-evident. There’s always going to be a debate about the truth especially in history. How many believed, as I did when I grew up, that Christopher Columbus discovered America? Well, they don’t always agree on that today. But what’s wrong with changes of view? They happen all the time. History is controversy. Today is controversy. Yesterday is controversy and tomorrow will be controversy. But so what? Nobody is going to be able to write the history of the world until God does. I’d suggest that what it amounts to, when you come down to the bottom line of this question, is that people will always differ. The danger is that if silence one point of view, you won’t get a balanced argument.

Has Dr. Hilberg proved a single thing here to be false? No, he hasn’t. He says he had documents. He produces none. He talks about the train tickets and schedules. What train tickets and schedules? If we’re talking about a criminal case we should have evidence. There isn’t enough evidence here today to convict one person for murdering one other person. But they want you to believe that six million died, or millions died, and that this question mark is false. Where is the evidence to support one murder by one person? There is no Hitler order; there is an alleged order somewhere by somebody alleged to have heard it from somebody else. There’s no evidence.

Let’s look at the evidence. Dr. Vrba says he’s an eye-witness. Dr. Vrba had a little problem here. You have plans, you know, submitted by the defence, of crematoria. Now, let’s make sure we understand each other. There certainly were crematoria. But that doesn’t mean there were gas chambers to gas people. But the issue is were 1,765,000 or millions gassed, killed by a systematic plan to do so? There’s no evidence of that. Dr. Vrba gave evidence of burning pits. Well, we know these places were no Sunday picnic. We know these places were unjust. Deprivation is unjust. The Jews suffered terribly, unjustifiably. The Jews were in concentration camps for war reasons and war is not justified, really. We had people in concentration camps here too. They lost a lot. Thank God we didn’t lose the war and couldn’t feed the people in our concentration camps. What would have happened in our country if the Eastern half had collapsed, the governments had collapsed, the railroads had collapsed, the food system had collapsed, the Western half had collapsed, and we had people, Japanese, for example, in concentration camps around Ottawa? Whom would we feed first, our troops or our prisoners? Thank God we didn’t have to answer that question. The Germans did. And they were hanged for answering it the wrong way.

Have you any idea what Germany looked like in 1945? It sure didn’t look like Toronto. And when the Russians came from the east, do you think they were a nice group of fellows as we are told the Allies were? I suggest to you that there is a great deal to be grateful for in this country and one of the greatest things to be grateful for is that we have never faced that kind of desolation, when everything you know, everything you trusted, everyone you believed in, your ideals, your neighbours, your friends, your country, your home, was ruined. I hope you’ll never know a situation like that. But if we are to understand what happened in Germany we cannot ignore these facts.

Did Dr. Hilberg know that? Was he there? No. Who was? Thies Christopherson was there. It’s obvious that this is a question that could only be understood really, by someone who was there. Dr. Barton was in a camp shortly after liberation, and, like many of us who saw the film Nazi Concentration Camps, he no doubt was as horrified as you and I had every right to be, by that scene. That picture Nazi Concentration Camps was put to you for a reason. It was to persuade you that there were millions of dead people. Well, you saw thousands of bodies, thousands of people who died from privation in war. Only once was there a deliberate suggestion of gassing. That was at Dachau, and I have gone into this with detail as much as you could hope to get, I suggest, in a court, to show that now people don’t say that there were gassings at Dachau. So what happened in that situation? Why did the Allies say there were gassings and now they don’t? Well, because of the same hysteria with which we have regarded Auschwitz for 40 years; Auschwitz, where no Allied soldier could go; Auschwitz where the Russians were; Auschwitz where 4 million or 3 million or 2.5 million or 1,765,000 or 1.1 million according to Hilberg or 900,000 according to Reitlinger, were killed? Cremated? Were what?

There are many reasons to say that this book has not been proven false, that’s all. It’s never been our burden to have to prove that it was true because our law has always allowed the reasonable doubt to go to the accused. He’s presumed innocent. This is presumed to be true until they prove the contrary, and I don’t think they’ve proved the contrary. How have they? Ninety percent of the quotations in the book are proven and accepted. Ten percent are unproven. That’s all.

The Malmedy trial took place in Germany shortly after the war. It may not technically be a Nuremberg trial. But do you really think that there is no substance to the suggestion that what took place there by the same allies against the same accused, is going to be different than what they did at Nuremberg?

You also have in evidence that, at Nuremberg, they didn’t even allow the press to talk to the lawyers of the accused, let alone the accused. So, how do we know what happened to them? Well, we know because some of them said so, and when they said so, like Streicher, they struck it out of the record. Don’t want the world to hear somebody complain about us, and we sure don’t want the press to hear what the accused says unless we say the accused can say it. Do you call that freedom? I don’t. I call that the attitude of war and victor’s justice. It works, obviously. The world believes in your cause, but is it necessary that for all eternity nobody should ever think to differ? Can we now look back with a little less passion, a little less contempt for our adversaries? Could we now maybe look at whether they might have had a point or do we have to believe forever they should be damned to silence?

We’ve heard from Dr. Barton that, in 1945, there was no cure for typhus. So, here’s some of those horrible Nazis telling these people in the concentration camps, “If you don’t delouse and typhus breaks out, you are going to be cremated.” That’s the way he interpreted that. There’s a lot of truth to it. If you get typhus, you are liable to die, especially there, in close confines. That is not to say I don’t believe the Jewish people didn’t suffer. I certainly do and so does my client, and so does this booklet. That’s not to say we lack compassion for the suffering of these people. It is to say we are prepared to examine whether there was a plan of deliberate extermination. There’s quite a difference.

If people died from typhus, disease, privation of war, you don’t have a situation that much different than you had in the Boer War, except on a larger scale, or in the American Civil War, where concentration camps for prisoners of war were hell on earth. And that becomes a significant question: why, if there was a plan to exterminate the Jews, was there a delousing program at all? Why were they told that they should delouse, and why were steps taken to provide the means that they could be protected from that disease?

You remember Arnold Friedman’s evidence. He could tell the difference between skinny people and fat people from the colour of the flames. Honest to goodness! Arnold Friedman is the kind of person you would like to know. Nothing do I say against Arnold Friedman, except that it’s a little bit far-fetched to say that you could tell from the colour of the flames, the people being cremated.

I could understand, as a young boy, how the stories would go around the camp, and I could well imagine how terrifying it must have been for a young boy in camp like that. I could understand how, being separated from his parents would be frightening. It would be horrible, beyond our imagination. But I suggest that when people say things like this, we have to understand that when people suffer, they want to communicate their suffering. They justifiably tend to exaggerate a little bit because they want us to understand how horrible it was. There are other reasons to look at the question, not to hurt the survivor’s feelings, but to look at it realistically and say, as this book says, it’s not correct to believe that six million people were exterminated in this way. It’s not correct to believe that you can tell the nationality of a cremated person by flames shooting from a chimney. That is not correct.

I am not wishing to accuses anybody of being a little bit loose with the facts. Let’s realistically consider that that doesn’t make sense. Let’s not make it a crime, anyway, to disbelieve it. All right? Let’s suggest that Mr. Zundel has at least very good reasons for his belief, common sense ones that he wants to believe in. He wants to understand that his people are not guilty of this crime. He has a motive to look at this. He is interested for the sake of his people, but realistically, is he far off the mark when he says, “I doubt that.”?

I am not saying that if even one Jewish person died that that wasn’t a crime. Of course it was, but we are dealing with an accusation of genocide, a book that questions it and the right to question it. That’s all. I am not suggesting for one moment that that minimizes the suffering, justifies the concentration camps, or anything else, but it allows us, I suggest, the right to question even Dr. Vrba, for after all, he too, is not God. If he’s going to tell us these things, under oath, I want to know why. Don’t you? If somebody tells you the whole population of Toronto went between two buildings, and disappeared, are you going to say, “Yes, I believe that. I don’t question that. I must accept that because he is a survivor”? I have reverence for their pain and suffering. I am not beyond understanding for that, but if we are dealing with a factual question, why not ask the question? And when you do ask the question, what do you get for answers? Hysteria, emotion, and appeals to emotions, too, justified as they are. But we are dealing with facts, let’s stick to facts.

Arnold Friedman also said that sick, older people came into his barracks after the selection, and, therefore, were not killed. And then we come to the question of selection. He describes the selection process in referring to selecting professions even among the older people. Now, why would they select professions? To kill the people? What do you care, if you are just killing people? You don’t care whether they are doctors, lawyers, tailors, whatever. You don’t select people by profession for the purpose of killing them, unless it’s lawyers, and then there’s lots of reasons for doing that.

I remember Dennis Urstein. He said, – and this is really, I suggest, where you’ve got to look a little bit skeptically – he said he lost 154 members of his family in the “Holocaust”. I said, “Could you name even 20?” I suggest to you that if any of us say we lost 154 members of our family, it tends to be a little dubious. How many members of your family do you know and how many generations do you go back? I asked him to name 20. He didn’t get there and ended up naming someone who died in the U.S.A. six or seven years ago. What it means is that people, because they suffer, tend to want you to understand their suffering and they sometimes exaggerate, that’s all.

Dennis Urstein was another volunteer witness who spoke of the colour of bodies hauled out of the gas chambers. Now, Dennis Urstein says he hauled the bodies out of Leichenkeller I, which is an underground mortuary, in Krema II. Now, you can see on the plan where that is. It may have been Krema III, he said, but I’ll tell you something. The two, Krema II and Krema III, are identical. No one will deny that. The plans are there. The two, Krema II and Krema III, in Birkenau are identical. They are long underground areas known as Leichenkellers. They are underground, because when typhus broke out, bodies, sometimes three or four hundred bodies, would be there, so that they would not infect the rest of the camp. The colour of those bodies, he described as grayish or green, but you heard Dr. Lindsay say that if someone is asphyxiated with Zyklon B, hydrogen cyanide, his body is brick red. Now, if they were gassed with Zyklon B, why would that not be so?

There is another question that arises out of Urstein’s evidence. The bodies, he said, had no rigor mortis. No rigor mortis. Now, if the bodies were gassed, and then, he seemed to imply, they were washed and thereby were safe. But if hydrogen cyanide is, as I suggested, water soluble, then touching water associated with the bodies means hydrogen-cyanic poisoning. Yet, he survived hauling those many bodies. He alleged the gas chamber was on ground level. Now, if you look at the plans, he is referring to other than the crematoria and he is referring to the Leichenkeller. He says that it’s a closed-in area. That’s underground. If you are hauling bodies, you are not going to forget hauling them upstairs, but he says it was on ground level. I asked him about that several times and he repeated it several times. This is no minor error, because if he could remember hauling bodies upstairs, it would be hard to forget.

Furthermore, he said there were no pillars. Well, look at the plans. If he is talking about Crematorium II or III, and if he is talking about what he says he was talking about, a flat-roofed building, well the crematoria is not flat-roofed. The Leichenkeller is, and it is underground with a very small protuberance above the ground. This is where Vrba got himself into a real problem. This is a man who says he was an eye-witness. We are supposed to examine the evidence and look at what we know of the facts, and see if it conforms. If it doesn’t, there are reasons to doubt it. He says there were no pillars. If you’ll look in the plans, you’ll see in the Leichenkeller massive pillars. He said the ground adjacent to the crematorium was very beautiful, like a retreat. No collection of piles of coke or other fuel to burn large numbers of bodies which allegedly were burned in the crematoria.

Now, the story of the exterminations is that two to three thousand or more bodies a day were handled in these facilities. There has to be an explanation for the figure of 1,765,000 in two years mentioned by Vrba. If there are 80 pounds of coke required for each body, for two thousand bodies (that’s what half of what Krema II is supposed to be handling a day), that’s 160,000 pounds of coke a day.

Let me deal with Dr. Barton for a moment. He presents the truth to the best of his knowledge. He agrees that what’s in this pamphlet was accurate, and that it quoted his article. He was there. He was an eye-witness. In 1945, he was there and he was as brainwashed as everybody else at the time, saying the Germans deliberately intended the killing of these people shown in the movie. He believed all that. And gradually he began to think about it, looked into the kitchen and saw the preparation records for food, and changed his mind. The war involved a little bit more than most people comprehended would be possible in the way of destruction.

It’s my suggestion to you that he treated the subject more scientifically than most people of his time. Just look what happened to him. He dared to say that the Germans didn’t mean to kill all those people, and you know they accuse him now, on public television, as you’ve heard, of killing 15,000 Jews.

What I suggest to you is that when people disagree with the widely held views of their time, they are attacked viciously. He was attacked in the media, in the press and everywhere. Why? What did he do wrong? Well, he dared to say that the Germans were not all bad and the Allies were not all good, and that war itself was the cause of the problem. That’s what he dared to say. He dared to say that the Allies were not all good; the Germans were not all bad; and that war killed people, but not gassing. So, what’s the difference? I suppose the difference is that Dr. Barton was a witness and the accused is the accused. He said there was no treatment for typhus at that time. He thinks essentially, that views should be challenged. He agreed that the average age persons, under conditions of being subject to massive public propaganda, coupled with fears for their families, destruction of their homes, their property, their value system and the desolation of their country, may be brainwashed and make confessions. They would not be able to respond independently of their captors.

Dr. William Brian Lindsay testified that the interpretations of World War II should be looked at by a scientist. The basic problem is the vast number of charges in the readings about the Holocaust. Also, the various authorities have different answers. He said some of the primary sources of information about the Holocaust had been silent for 30 years, during which time history has been written. He looked at all the so-called murder camps in his research. He went to Belzec, Sobibor, Chelmno, Birkenau, Monowitz. He put himself in the position of knowing what the accusations are, and, as a chemist, decided how reasonable the charges are.

In describing the properties of Zyklon B, he discussed the container it came in, the special opener that had to be used, the fact that the gas is lighter than air when it vaporizes, and that the best air would be at the bottom. Now, the Crown said that, well, it’s not very much lighter than air and it would rise slowly and the crystals might have fallen on the ground, enabling people to believe that the gas would come from the ground first. But that wouldn’t explain the fact that the people would stay where the gas crystals were and stay there so they could climb above each other. They were scattered in other areas, but that wasn’t asked by the Crown and that’s why, when Griffiths asked him his questions, and I asked him mine, in the end he said he did not think his opinion had changed.

He refers to the necessity of a venting system. No such thing exists in any of the plans. Look at the plans. That’s because it is a Leichenkeller, a mortuary, not a gas chamber. They want to call it a gas chamber? Then, produce the evidence. Where is it? He concluded that it’s impossible that gassings happened as alleged. For millions to have been gassed in four crematoria, by the method described, 2000 persons crammed into a space of the size alleged, is impossible.

He refers to these spaces that are put forward as gas chambers as unsealed rooms. The difficulties of unsealed rooms in comparison to the American gas chamber, become obvious. A small container of gas is necessary due to the quality of the gas itself. If it were otherwise, chemistry would change from time to time, and from place to place, but it doesn’t. The fact is, that if there is an allegation of this kind, there has to be a real possibility of it having occurred. Otherwise, we are engaged in fantasy.

He has examined the alleged gas chamber at Auschwitz I. There are no doors between gas chamber and the crematoria. Vents are not air-tight. The doors are very very small. The whole thing wouldn’t work. And he comes to that conclusion himself.

Now, he communicated this information to Zundel. So, why shouldn’t Zundel believe him? Why shouldn’t it be credible? Who has done more research into the subject? Who has actually made a study into these gas chambers? I suppose the Crown will answer that by saying, it doesn’t matter. If there are no gas chambers, we will find some other explanation for the six million. What? What was it – shooting, Einstazgruppen, the Stroop report? It doesn’t come to five million, especially when one considers the evidence in reference to the Einsatzgruppen. But we are supposed to believe anyway.

Dr. Lindsay examined the Gerstein statement. He discussed how carbon-monoxide poisoning from a diesel engine is not possible. Yet, that is said to be the method used in Sobibor, Treblinka and others – gas from diesel tank engines, from Russian tank engines. That is the story. Well, if carbon-monoxide is not produced by diesel engines, how is it supposed to be the cause of death? Then, we have the stories of prisoners eating and drinking after handling the dead bodies. It would be suicidal. Shower baths would be abysmal to gas people. What story are we dealing with? The same story we had in Dachau. The gas chambers are showers and the gas comes from the shower heads. Yet, Dachau now has a sign that nobody was ever gassed there. Lindsay fought for the Allies during the war, and I suggest that he is not really to be regarded as one with an axe to grind.

James Keegstra testified primarily to show what happens if you try to question the Holocaust. He is where he is today, not because of his attitude on anything else, but primarily because he dared to say that there’s another view on the Holocaust. That’s when it got picked up by the media. That’s when the ball got rolling. That is when everybody got up in arms. If somebody has an opinion on politics, that’s no problem. But if somebody says anything about the Holocaust, that implies they don’t believe in it, hook, line and sinker, then they are in big trouble.

It’s bad for people who want to discuss it. It is also bad because it denies the possibility to find the truth for everybody. So, there’s a man who’s been a teacher for 21 years, who has been the victim, I suggest, of a massive campaign of vilification because he dared to question.

What a surprising thing! Anybody could be accused of rape, murder, theft or fraud. I’ll bet they wouldn’t suffer the animosity, the hate that occurs to anybody who questions the Holocaust or anybody who is accused of a war crime in the media. Tell me how many murderers have received the publicity against them that Frank Walus got? He hadn’t been tried yet. He was accused of a hideous crime, but it was ridiculous. The man wasn’t even in Poland during the war. He was seventeen years old and he was accused of being an Obergruppenfuhrer during the war, murdering Jews. And eleven witnesses came forward, and said, yes he was, and seven of those said they weren’t even in Poland during the war. That’s justice? Well, that’s not very much different than the atmosphere that prevailed in 1945 and that’s why it is relevant to the issue today, because in this booklet it says Nuremberg was probably rife with prejudice. If the hatred and the prejudice is so great today that that type of thing can happen right now, in Chicago and in the U.S.A., how much greater do you think the pressure was in 1945 for the same result?

This is 40 years later. And who gives Frank Walus anything for what he suffered? Or this man? Even if he is acquitted, who will take care to see that he gets justice, other than maybe an acquittal?

The evidence of Gary Botting is that of an English professor who desired to put forward another view of the Holocaust story. He was presented, or attempted to present, in consideration of the need to tell both sides, the book Hoax of the Twentieth Century [by Arthur Butz]. The Government of Canada decided nobody should read it in Canada. Why? Is it obscene? Take a look at it and ask yourselves this question. Is this society free for people to think, to analyze this question, if a book like that is supposed to be banned and was prevented from being read by students at college level? These are some poor timid human beings in high school as we were told some are, who could be influenced deleteriously by this book. This is college level. They aren’t allowed to have this. Why is that?

It points in another direction than the thesis of the exterminationists. What kind of a country does not permit people to read a book like that? Have a look at it. There’s really nothing abusive in it about anybody. The truth is very clear, that there is a power in this land that doesn’t want you to think about it, doesn’t want anybody out here to think about it, and has made up the mind of somebody in power that anyone who questions this belief will be prosecuted and publicly humiliated. That’s not the kind of country I want nor should any free man or woman want to live in.

Our forefathers fought for the right to be free to think and free to speak. Now, what are we doing here? The sacrifices of those who died for freedom are not respected by this legal proceeding. Gary Botting and others have paid their price for coming here. You can bet on that. Those same forces that will make this man spend seven weeks in that box will make every witness who comes here pay for having done so. You can be sure of that. Anyone who even dares to support this man’s thesis will be labeled. And that’s supposed to be a free society? It’s all very very sad. It may be, if some of those people who are dead, who thought they defended freedom, were alive, we might not be here today.

Gary Botting said it’s a dangerous precedent to do what’s going on here. You know where his father is? He’s buried at Belsen. That’s what he told you. His father. Well, it’s dangerous alright. He dared to write to the Attorney-General to question why he couldn’t read this book or have the students read it. He has no sympathy for the Nazis. His attitude was that people should be free to hear both sides of an issue. No, not in Canada. We are not smart enough even to be able to read that book. We are not supposed to be able to read this book. We are not intelligent enough to decide whether we want to believe this or not.

Is this the way we are supposed to use our brains? The measure of a person’s honest inquiry is whether a person wants to examine alternative sources. Nobody asks them to be government-funded sources, sponsored by anybody. I remember at one point somebody said the research of Dr. Fourisson was not government-funded. So what? You mean to tell me that no one should be believed unless he is on a government subsidy? If Dr. Fourisson pays through his own efforts for his research, is that an indication he is insincere? Or, if someone publishes a book, like Udo Walendy, being a publisher himself, is this to discredit it too? Have we come to the stage of 1984 where, unless it’s published by Big Brother, it isn’t to be believed?

Orwell1984BKCv

I remember the dramatic gesture performed by the Crown when he asked the accused: “Well, who published this? Institute of Historical Review?” Bang. So what? If they are all published by the Institute of Historical Review, so what? Have we come to the point where there is an official sanction on certain publishers? Is it the old argument of don’t look at the contents of the book, just see who publishes it. Well, if that is the case, I suppose the official view of history is already established.

Doug Collins was a soldier during the war. He was captured at Dunkirk. He was in German prisoner of war camps during the war, escaped, was recaptured, escaped and was interned again as far away as Rumania, and went to Bergen-Belsen even before Dr. Barton. One of the things he said about his own experience is, that when he saw the troops coming back, the S.S. released by the Russians, they reminded him of the prisoners in Bergen-Belsen, for their condition. He says Did Six Million Really Die? should be available. There isn’t an abusive line in it. “I have been more abusive in my columns.” He said politicians aren’t entitled to suppress views. This is endemic to all dictatorships.

Doug Collins

DOUG COLLINS – JOURNALIST, FREE SPEECH ADVOCATE
____________________________________________

He talked about Alice in Wonderland being banned in China. I wonder where we are. I remember when the Crown was cross-examining my client on the stand, I almost had to pinch myself to find out if I was really in the country I grew up in, because he was asking him: “Do you believe this? Are you a fascist? Did you write this?” What are we doing here? Is he on trial for his beliefs? Or is he on trial for this being false? Are we living in a free society, or are we not? He said, in the end, I guess, this country likes censorship. I wonder. If you do anything in this world, you will answer that question here. And, indeed, this might be the most powerful thing you will do in your life, certainly the most significant thing. It is a great privilege to practice law, but I don’t think there can be a greater privilege than to do what you are going to do – decide whether we like censorship or not. That’s a decision you will make. There is not, he said, an expert on the Holocaust. There are many versions. If one died, that’s important. If one died, that’s a crime. If one Jewish person died, it’s a crime. If one person, no matter whether he was Jewish or not died, it’s a crime. But that is not the issue.

AliceinWonderland

If we are dealing with the issue of genocide, mass murder by gassing, not by work or privation, or war, but this specific crime with the specific weapon of gas chambers; if that’s the issue, then we have to give freedom to others to put forward their views. That’s what Doug Collins said. He said Zundel’s pamphlet is a point of view. He doesn’t agree with it, but he upholds its right to be said.

When Hilberg was asked whether Zundel was being honest, he said what I think we all have to answer in the way of a question: “Can you read his mind? Can you look into his brain?” All you can do is look at the printed word. You had a chance to hear him. You’ve had a chance to see him cross-examined about his beliefs and whether he is this, and whether he is that. He’s not perfect. He is not a perfect human being and neither am I, neither are most people I know. So, why should he be on the stand for having views that maybe you don’t agree with? Why?

Considering The West, War and Islam, I’d like to draw your attention to a significant part of that publication. It says, for the cost of one plane, one rocket, one bullet, we can make a film, a book, or send a letter. That’s what Zundel tried to do, change the Arab response to Zionism, from violence to communication. Is that a crime? Is that an intent dangerous to the social or racial harmony of Canada, when the pamphlet was sent in a sealed envelope to people in the Middle East? Whether he said things that were right or wrong, being quite aside for the moment, would that itself be a crime – would it affect the social and racial harmony of Canada deleteriously? It would seem to me that all it would ever accomplish, if it could accomplish what it sought to do, would be to convert Arab responses of violence and terrorism into Arab responses of communication with the hope that somebody might bring influence in a political sense to bear on the whole problem of the Middle East. It would seem a fairly responsible, albeit somewhat grandiose hope, maybe a pious hope, at a time when Mr. Zundel perceived, perhaps rightly, perhaps wrongly, that problems in the Middle East were about to erupt in a world war. Most of us would sit back and watch it on television, do nothing about it and hope that somebody else would act. Well, Mr. Zundel is not that kind of man. He desired a solution. He thought he could offer one. Now, if that’s a crime, we’d better forget about communicating. It would seem to me to communicate the alternative to planes, rockets and bullets of films, books and letters, is a pretty good solution to the problem. It sure brings us a lot closer to a solution than silence or violence. I don’t, with the greatest of respect, understand how the Crown can allege that my client is supposed to have upset racial or social tolerance in Canada by sending such letters, as he did to people in the Middle East, thousands of miles away.

The only two publications in which Mr. Zundel is alleged to have done anything wrong are The West, War and Islam, and this one. Is this wrong? And when he wasn’t sure, he took the chance, and published, and sent it to whom? Hiding something here? No, he sent it to the Attorney-General of Ontario, sent it to all the Attorneys-General, sent it to the Members of Parliament, and school teachers. He even wrote to the Attorney-General and said: “If you don’t think I’m entitled to publish this, please give me some guidelines.”

If this country is going to involve itself in censorship through official channels like the Attorney-General of Ontario, then I suggest it owes it to the citizens to tell them where the legal limits to freedom lie. If it was a suggestion made by the Crown that the accused deliberately provoked a situation damaging to racial and social tolerance, then why did he ask for an answer as to what he’s entitled to publish? Why didn’t someone give him an answer? I’ll tell you why; because it’s politically embarrassing for an Attorney-General to identify the real censorship that he’s seeking to introduce through fear. It’s easier to prosecute somebody and scare the whole world into keeping quiet, because they don’t want to be where he is. It works very well, but it’s rather insidious, and I suggest the best answer to that kind of censorship through fear, is to throw out these types of charges.

If they’re going to invoke censorship, they’d better write it down and say so and take responsibility for it in the House of Commons. Then, the public will know we don’t live in a free country anymore and can vote against them; but if they’re going to play this kind of political game with censorship by scaring people, by not answering their letters, as to what they’re entitled to write, the result is self-censorship. It’s called, “everybody keep their mouth shut,” That’s something Doug Collins mentioned. The result of the controversy surrounding the Holocaust and the danger of questioning it and the fact that you always get a visit from some particular group if you write on it, results in self-censorship. It’s not official censorship and so we can tell the world that we don’t censor people, but you just watch it. You don’t write about this and you don’t write about that and you keep your mouth shut about this because it’s safer.

I suggest that if you have any doubt about that, you take a good look at the Soviet constitution. They have glowing phrases about freedom of speech, but it’s often limited by some qualifying words about security of the State, and, suddenly, people know better than to say certain things. They know better than to criticize the government, they know better than to raise questions about certain issues, and they know better than to talk about the Helsinki Accord, or a few other subjects in the Soviet Union. What’s the difference with this question? It seems that political power has some influence in what you’re entitled to say and what you’re entitled to do, without it ever being responsible for censoring publicly through the legal process.

Section 177 is a very vague way of defining what you publish. If you’re talking about history, what’s false? There are so many views and so many issues. How can you be sure what you’re entitled to say? I suppose the best solution is, as Doug Collins said, on a subject like the Holocaust, to check with the Canadian Jewish Congress or the B’nai Brith as to what you can publish.

 

BBCanlogo

CANADA’S OPPONENTS OF FREE SPEECH
_____________________________________

But I suggest that you could and should send a message to the world and to the rest of society. It’s not a message that’s intolerant; it is a message of decency, tolerance and understanding, a message to all the sincere young Jewish men and women around the world that perhaps they need not feel more persecuted nor the subject of more hate than any other group; that the war was not all that it is said to be vis-a-vis themselves; that they might no longer say, “Never forgive and never forget,” those types of comments; that they may feel no more the victims of suffering than others in war who have also suffered. Maybe that would be a healthy thing to say, beneficial to all. Perhaps. Just perhaps, they too should put behind them the story of the six million slaughter which they are being imbued and embittered with. Perhaps their suffering is no worse nor any greater than many, many others. So, for the sake of love, peace and understanding, we may not view Jews as extraordinary sufferers, and Nazis, which is a thin disguise, in much of our media, for Germans, as some inherently evil beasts. This stereotyping is intolerance. This evil exultation of hate can only be exorcized in the fresh air of free debate. That can only come through freedom to examine truth freely and throw off unnecessary guilt. If the guilt is necessary, it should be accepted. If it is unnecessary, it should be dispensed with, dropping the disproportionate lies of a mass hysteria which certain political forces daily feed upon. Stop seeing Nazis in every criticism of Judaism, or you will suffer from lack of true criticism. No one is absolutely right, not even the Jews; and no one is absolutely wrong, not even the Germans.

It should be at least open for people to discuss the Holocaust, and, if it isn’t, how healthy a society do we have? We should never suspend our critical faculties of reason and skepticism even to the suffering of the Jews on the issue of the Holocaust. Other groups of people are freely criticized every day. You know, when I was thinking about the context of this whole question, it occurred to me, that there are other atrocity stories, two of which are very famous. One is the Ukrainian Holocaust, or some people dare to call it that, where it is alleged in the thirties, Stalin starved to death five or six million Ukrainian people.

Now, if I was to put together all the evidence that contradicted that, that said it was a false belief, and published that, would that be false news? Or the Armenians say that a million or more of their people were slaughtered by the Turks in 1915 and they hold this as a very important part of their belief. If I were to dispute that and publish my views, would that be false news? And yet, whatever the truth or falsity of those beliefs may be, they stand on their own. No government sanctions say you must believe this. They are not taught in schools as history. In fact, I recently heard that you can’t teach the Ukrainian Holocaust in Manitoba in schools. But, this belief in the Holocaust has become so sacred that nobody can even question it. That is not right. In a free society, no group should have its beliefs imposed by law. We don’t have a state religion. We shouldn’t have one. We don’t have an official history. We shouldn’t have one. If this booklet is right, as the accused says it is, it should be freely heard and freely thought about and freely criticized. If it is not, why fear it? If it is false, there is easy access to a million more resources of public persuasion than this booklet ever had. It does not need the government’s help as some official repository of truth, however sanctimonious its bureaucratic officials may be. Let freedom solve the problem of any hatred or intolerance, else by suppression the human spirit, which seeks truth and seeks the ultimate truth of God, will become crippled by its fears to speak its deepest feelings. Only by our meeting fact to face, by our being as we really are with all our personal prejudices and suspicions, can we accept our faults and by airing our views without fear, learn to love each other with a true and deeper love than if we never disagreed in the first place.

Now, if my client has a wrong belief, he honestly does not believe his beliefs are wrong. He believes they are right. Then, let there be a debate. He invites debate. To the extent a free society allows debate, health and understanding will result. Let a few people decide, let the powerful decide, let some bureaucrat decide, or even, with the greatest of respect, force the duty upon a judge to decide what are true and false beliefs, and the State will inevitably have the power to define truth and become an absolute power. Violence is the end of the road for official truth. In a society where people aren’t free to have their own views, and official truth prevails, they will eventually resort to violence. You see that in many dictatorships throughout the world. If you can’t express views freely in words, in writing, in print, how do people express them? You can see in the world today how they generally do, and that’s very unfortunate.

I said in the beginning, this place, this court, is far too expensive, far too important, to be involved in debates about history. This court and the courts throughout Canada have rules of evidence which are there to determine disputes of fact, but here we haven’t dealt with fact, we’ve dealt with opinion about history. Free access to the marketplace of ideas does not and cannot take place here. This court was not designed to be a place where the affairs of the world are debated, but rather where individual conduct is inquired into.

Whoever is responsible for pursuing these kinds of prosecutions, and it is indeed, I suggest, a decision for which somebody is responsible, he should consider what is at stake, and what occurs in the court, and consider that it shouldn’t happen again. If by acquitting the accused, you make it clear that this is an improper type of thing to do to a citizen in a free society, we won’t have these sorts of trials again, I suggest. It would be less likely that those who made this decision in the first place will repeat it. But I can assure you that there are many people who would love to have the power to silence different points of view, and it’s very easy when you can put people through the kind of thing the accused has been through. I suggest the false news section may have been intended to deal with a specific allegation of false news like a publication of a sort which briefly stated a fact to be true that was false, but it surely can’t be usefully employed to deal with a matter of controversy involving history. The court should not deal with trials of historical issues. This place is too expensive and over-regulated by legal rules to permit an adequate discussion of history. For the sake of freedom, I ask you never to forget what is at stake here. You must remember that we have fought for your freedom as well as for that of the accused; that is, the accused stands in the place of anyone who desires to speak his mind. Even if you don’t approve or agree with what he says, you must take it as a sacred responsibility not to allow the suppression of someone’s honest beliefs.

I want to finish by reading you a little letter that I got once. It explains what I mean when I say history is a very complex thing and it changes from time to time and it should be free to do so. It says, “What is truth? As a child I was taught that the Indians were savages. Later on in life I found out that it was the white man who had initiated scalping and the killing of women and children. I was taught in school that Louis Riel was a traitor to his country and therefore executed and that John A. MacDonald was a hero.

Later on in life I was to discover that Louis Riel is regarded by some as a hero defending his people’s rights to their land and the famous Sir John A. had been caught taking bribes from the CPR, and resigned in disgrace. He also died an alcoholic. During the Second World War, I was told that Stalin was a good leader who fought on the good side. When I was older I found out that he was responsible for the government-imposed starvation of millions of Ukrainians in 1933. In 1941 I was told that Germany was our enemy and Russia was our ally. In 1951 I was told that Germany was our ally and Russia was our enemy. In 1956 I was told that China slaughtered millions of its own people. It was our enemy and today I’m told that China is our friend and ally, in a way.”

Therefore, when an individual has the integrity to question the credibility of a government-imposed view of history, we should listen with an open mind and search for the truth. It would seem to me that the truth will be in debate for a long time. But if we silence one side of any dispute or anyone’s view of truth because we think he is wrong then society as a whole will suffer. An individual will suffer. And you will suffer.

Patrick Henry said: “Give me liberty or give me death.” If you don’t have liberty you have a kind of spiritual death, the death that comes from people who never use their minds. That’s a real spiritual death. If we are to live in a free society where people are alive and have hope in their lives then we must have liberty.

With the right verdict people who brought this prosecution into being will not do it again. It will take a lot of courage. But you are the repository of the trust of your country and in the moment you decide to acquit and stick to that principle you will give history the best gift your descendants could ever ask for: A free country.

—–
For further information on relevant cases, articles, letters, bio, videos and more please see: http://www.douglaschristie.com/

To obtain a copy of this document please contact Paul Fromm at CAFE, PO Box 332 Station “B”, Etobicoke, Ontario, M9W 9Z9 or write to Paul at paul@paulfromm.com

 

The Struggle against Vivisection. Speech by Hermann Goering 1933 Translation by Fred Scherbaum

 

GoeringVivisectionHdr copy 4

Hermann Göring Speeches and  Essays

Radio broadcast on August 28 1933

The Struggle against Vivisection.

Translation from German by Fred Scherbaum

“It goes against the thinking of a German, especially against the ideology of  National Socialism to equate an animal with inanimate matter”

~ Hermann Goering

Fellow Germans!

Since the day of the release of my decree to abolish the cruelty of vivisection, I received a flood of telegrams and letters expressing agreement and happiness that finally real steps were taken in the fight against cruelty to animals.

animals-vivisection

The sudden release of my decree was a big surprise.  For years now, the fight against vivisection was carried on. Many discussions took place in scientific and unscientific circles, but nothing was done. Right from the beginning, the National Socialist Government knew that serious steps would have to be taken to correct the situation energetically, but still it took month before the law, with all its preparations, was  adopted. To prevent the further expansion of cruelty to animals in the interim, while the law was finalized, I  decreed under the powers given to me,  the protective incarceration in concentration camps, for those who think that animals are a mere matter.  German people have always acted with great affection and concern towards  animals and the protection of animals. Domestic animals in particular were always considered to be God’s creation, since for thousands of years they were our companions in and outside of our homes. One can even say that they were not only our co-workers but also our  co-warriors in regards to horses.

For the German people animals were considered to be creatures of the flesh, not just in an organic sense, but that they show feelings of pain, joy, loyalty and attachment. Never was it in the consciousness of the people to  think of animals as a soulless, lifeless, unfeeling object to be exploited or as a tool for labor, or to be utilized for a subject of usefulness, to be abused or even killed. The fairytales and legends of Aryan people, foremost the German folk, demonstrate their spirit of unity which the Aryans show toward animals.

AHLoverAnimals

Therefore it is to difficult to understand that the previous application of the law did not agree with the consciousness of the people, not only in this instant, but also in many others. Under the influence of a foreign  interpretation and concept  of justice the sad fact was that the justice system was taken over by foreigners and as a consequence animals were classified as dead matter, which in turn empowered the owner of the animal with right to do whatever he decided to do with it. It is not in the concept of a German,  definitely not that of National Socialism, to give the absolute right to do as one pleases in this respect. In his home the owner could do with the animal whatever he wanted, without fear of prosecution or he could torture the animal for wretched reasons we do not understand.

Up to the rise of National Socialism rough treatment or cruelty to animals was only prosecuted when it caused a public nuisance, with witnesses and other people present. Only under these circumstances was a prosecution possible. The new 1927 law, the way it was written, was supposed to change things, it intended to make cruelty to animals punishable, but had a clause exempting this offence from the law as long it was done for religious or scientific reasons. This miserable and insufficiently written law did not protect animals from cruelty by not specifying in what manner scientific experimentation on an animals is permissible. Also the manner in which an individual does scientific experiments on animals should not be left to an individual called to perform such work. Procedures on animals to develop new medicines to cure human ailments and for research are in need of being regulated by law and supervised by the authorities.

AHFeedingDeer

It was a sad hallmark of science in a period of two decades before and after WW 1 by thinking in a materialistic way using chemical and physical experiments, aided by loopholes in the existing law.  This method of dealing with animals was unacceptable to a German.  Not only French experimenters, like the infamous Claud Fernar, but also Germans, but mostly alien scientists performed horrendous cruelties, which if there was a small gain, would have never made any sense in relation to pain inflicted. Quite a few of these scientists, many, aliens amongst them, seem to have lost their sensitivity for their actions, or they never had any to begin with. One can find examples of this in old literature describing procedures without anesthetization of the worst kind, such as operations, inflicting burns, freezing, hunger and more, all this showing no sign of human compassion.

Vivisection – the cutting of an unanaesthetizised animal was used. Among the laboratory animals were rats, guinea pigs, rabbits and what people abhorred the most, the human companion – the dog. They all were used to cut into the body to reveal the heart, chiseling into the brain, cutting limbs off to observe the reaction of the animal and the consequences thereof. It is unfathomable to us National Socialists why pain was not eliminated when operating on the animal and if so, it was done without care, since it was a mere animal.

AHwithBird

Let’s put the question aside how much vivisection, in past decades, contributed to the knowledge of the working of the human body and it’s anatomy. Today’s scientists are coming to the conclusion that cruel killing by vivisection does not contribute any more to our knowledge. Therefore less and less of these procedures are performed.  All the more the prohibition of vivisection does not only show our consideration when animals are in pain, but plain humanity demands it. Not only to protect pain-feeling animals, but at the same time we strive to eliminate gross negligence, brutality and cruelty. Therefore I gave orders to stop and punish any vivisection in Prussia which right now, means the incarceration in a concentration camp until the law itself will proscribe a severe punishment.  I asked the appropriate Prussian Ministries to rush the finalization of the law and I can tell you that the Reich Interior Ministry is only weeks from submitting it for passage.

Vivisection does not include other unnecessary forms of cruelty to animals. Painful scientific tests as well as cruelty to animals, as they occur on a daily basis in life, are in need of regulation by law so that finally all the questions regarding the passing of the new law to prevent cruelty to animals will be answered in a uniform and exemplary fashion, encouraged by my decree to have problems solved by experts in this field. The task for the experts will be to determine if, or to what extent animal experimentation is even still necessary to study human ailments, to develop new medications to do further research and to aid progress. I am thinking about the methods used to identify epidemics and infectious deceases threatening man and animals alike. Is it not possible to detect the cause of serious illness by microscopic examination or can this only be accomplished by animal experiments? If so, it should only be done with the use of anesthesia and proper care.

The taking of blood from animals, to develop blood serum serves mankind by fighting illnesses. These rather small, but necessary invasive procedures cannot be seen as cruelty or vivisection, since they serve to combat serious infectious deceases. Lets just think of our experience in the war, in which we had the irreplaceable assistance of serums to fight lockjaw or gangrene. If the taking of animal blood is done in a careful way, no harm is done. In time of need man also will give part of his blood to help others. Experimentations on pigs made possible the German drug “Germanin”, with an international standing, the only effective drug against the terrible sleeping sickness.  In order to guarantee its effectiveness this drug has to be tested on animals. But also this testing has to be performed under necessary care with anesthesia. Drugs, such as Insulin, made from animal organs is most successful against Diabetes. Nowadays pharmaceutical industries in the developed countries are quarrelling over its production and marketing. Since Insulin cannot be tested chemically, animal testing only is still necessary. The sickness caused by a substandard diet, scurvy, also needed animal testing. Hopefully such testing will contribute to new insights in the formulation of diets.

AHDogDrawing

I do not want to repeat quoting examples but they all illustrate our successful labors in science. Anything not absolutely necessary in animal testing has to be stopped and unavoidable procedures have to be done with the utmost care. For science to serve mankind, operations demand local or total anesthesia to be given not only to humans, but also to animals, with utmost care. Animals with a special relationship to man, like dogs and cats, have to be exempted from experimentation and substituted by a lower grade animal. The rat, a vermin to be eliminated and surely less prone to pain, is less deserving of our sympathy than dogs and cats. But even in this case, utmost deliberations are to be taken when experiments are done and to be taken only when no other way can be found to aid man.

Only a limited group of serious scientists and certain institutions will be allowed to do such animal experiments to benefit mankind the most. Here also the state has to supervise and when called for stop abuses. For education in the medical field pictures and films will be used to substitute for animal experimentation as far as possible. In a symposium, called by me, all the details of this matter will be dealt with by experts in science and in the field of animal protection and they in turn will submit their suggestions to me.  Scientists with longstanding sympathy towards animal welfare will be specially appointed by me to this panel. This will ensure a new and precise law will be formulated for passage. For many years now animal protectors and those who use animals wantonly have been in conflict with each other. Medical knowledge can hardly be gained by a student haphazardly cutting into a live animal in order to make experiments. To finally resolve this burning question the legal provisions I put forth will contribute to a solution. This in turn will, in part, enhance German domestic tranquility. What is necessary will remain, but the unnecessary, noxious vivisection and cruelty to animals will be a thing of the past, so that the development of our internal and external political life can come to a consensus.

——-

Hans J. Krampe: German Patriot & Defender of Historic Truth (1943 ~ 2014) R.I.P.

HansJKrampePortrait-800

Hans J. Krampe: German Patriot & Defender of Historic Truth (1943 ~ 2014) R.I.P.

By

Arthur Topham

December 23rd, 2014

It is with the deepest sense of sadness and grief that I find myself having to convey so close to Christmas the tragic news to Radical Press list members that my brother-in-arms and fellow compatriot Hans J. Krampe has suddenly passed away from this world and I only learned of his death days ago.

The sorrow of knowing that Hans will no longer be with us to carry on his relentless quest to right all the infinite number of wrongs that have been perpetrated upon the German people over the 20th and 21 Centuries by the Zionist Jew juggernaut now threatening the planet with global war and endless degradation is almost too much to bear for me.

Since the inception of the Radical Press in June of 1998 Hans Krampe was my indefatigable and stalwart feature writer for the former alternative monthly tabloid known as The Radical which, with his dedicated writing and financial support we were able to successfully publish 42 consecutive editions running until June of 2002.

Afterwards the hard copy edition went online and became known as RadicalPress.com and is still carrying on the struggle to adhere to the original motto of the former tabloid of “Digging to the root of the issues”  in order to bring truth, justice and honesty to the public domain via the Internet.

 Hans and I spent too many years together working on articles and sharing our life experiences for me to try and encapsulate all that’s gone down over the past sixteen years. Those who know of Hans’ work know what a powerful and poignant writer he was and how he could sift through the bullshit Zionist propaganda and cut to the chase cogently demolishing any and all arguments put forth against the National Socialist government of Adolf Hitler by Germany’s (and the world’s) eternal enemy.

I will, in the future, once the Christmas season is over try to put together a more comprehensive article and biography of Hans Krampe’s life and work. For now it is time only to mourn his loss and send loving prayers for his soul.

One of Hans’ email friends who he communicated with was the U.S. internet writer John Kaminski. John recently sent me an email containing his comments upon hearing of Hans’ passing. I would like to share them with readers.

JK writes:

More than any other person, Hans Krampe demonstrated to me the difference between honest non Jewish Germans and the Jewish purveyors of false history who have totally warped the facts of World War II and led the world into a prison of poison thought from which it might never emerge. Hans once told me we were a lot alike, which is one of the greatest honors I ever received. I always marveled, not only at the precision with which he wielded his second language of English, but of the lofty standards of logic and principle that infused his every statement that provided for me a standard of behavior to constantly shoot for. In fact, it was my observations of Hans that completely convinced me of the tragedy of World War II, in which the finest people in the world were incomprehensibly savaged by this heartless Jewish war machine now running rampant in the world today. The world desperately needs more people with the lofty standards and unflinching honesty of Hans Krampe.

May God bless and keep Hans and may he rest in the peace which he so deserves.

Exclusive Interview with Hockey Coach and Truth-Revealer Christopher Sandau by RadicalPress.com

NewChrisLHdr

Exclusive Interview with Hockey Coach and Truth-Revealer Christopher Sandau

by

RadicalPress.com 

ATEditorRP300 copy

[Editor’s Note: The recent media frenzy over former North Delta hockey coach Christopher Sandau’s Facebook page has proven once again that freedom of expression here in Canada is definitely under heavy attack by the Zionist controlled news outlets. I was able to contact Chris Sandau yesterday and do an interview with him on his reaction to all of the hullabaloo surrounding his efforts to bring the truth about Adolf Hitler and the National Socialist party of Germany to the attention of his Facebook friends and viewers.]

INTERVIEW WITH CHRISTOPHER SANDAU

CHRIS SANDAU

RadicalPress.com: Well Chris it looks like the proverbial shit has hit the fan now that the Zionist-Jew controlled media here in Canada was tipped off about your Facebook page. At first glance and from the few examples shown in the Zionist news media the subject matter that you had posted on your page is hardly unusual for Facebook. There are numerous FB pages and groups where dozens, if not hundreds of FB members, have exactly the same material and in many cases a whole lot more information on the real history of Adolf Hitler and the National Socialist Party from the period of German history that began in 1933 with the democratic election of Hitler and the NSPD  and ended abruptly in 1945. Do you think that your page suddenly caught the attention of Zionist media and that you in particular were singled out for attack simply because of the fact that you were a hockey coach and working with kids ages 11-14?

Chris S: Hey Arthur, I do feel that also the timing of this event may have spiked the Zionist media’s interest in my particular story as it has happened so close to Remembrance Day. And yes, me being a hockey coach for kids was indeed a big reason for them to again bring as much negative attention as possible so that they can ensure nobody will ever try put out such information again when holding what can be deemed as an influential position in society.

RadicalPress.com: It’s fairly evident from the knowledge that you had posted on your home page that you have taken the time to look deeper into the status quo history that Canadians have been programmed all their lives to believe as the real history of Germany during the period of the second world war. Can you tell readers how it was that you came to escape all the early school and media brainwashing that Canadians are subjected to and realized that history as we know it was in fact extremely one sided, favouring the victors in the war rather than looking at real causes and the real history of National Socialist Germany.

Chris S: I’d say my awakening more or less started about 6 months after 9/11 thanks to a friend who put me onto a few websites including Alex Jones, Henry Makow, and David Icke and that got me looking at the world differently. As for the history of WW1 & WW2, for as long as I can remember first hearing of those events I had always a keen curiosity and always found the official story to be somewhat untrue, I just never knew where to find possible truthful information. Nor did I have much time as I was caught up in chasing the professional hockey playing dream. Really just in the past few years I started coming across information from the likes of Dr. Fredrick Toben, Germar Rudolf, David Irving, Professor Robert Faurisson, Fred Leuchter, Ernst Zundel, David Cole, Dennis Wise, the list goes on. After finding such information I realized that these truthers held more weight due to the fact they are touching subjects that most other truthers are too scared to touch and I’m at the moment discovering why.

RadicalPress.com: Are you of German ancestry Chris and if so could you provide readers with a bit of background on what your personal connections are with Germany.

Chris S: Yes Arthur, my father’s parents are German as well as my mother’s mother. My mother herself is born in England and her father was in the Royal Airforce. As for my father’s father, he was actually born in a German village called Katzbach in what is today in the Ukraine. My father’s mother came from Alsace Lorraine which also at the time was apart of Germany. Both grandparents came to Canada before WW1. As for my mother’s mother she was an aspiring pianist and actually moved from Munich to London in 1939 where she would soon meet her husband. In 1940 my mother was born and in 1942 my grandfather flew them to Canada where they would settle. However shortly after, my grandfather had to fly back to England to rejoin the RAF and soon after returning wouldn’t be heard from again. My grandmother’s brother Maximilian, whom I was given my middle name after, served in the German military till the summer of 1941. He positioned himself in the military as a messenger and was sent to Belgium on a mission where he would eventually get on a ship to the United States. The details of why and how he did this are shady as he never liked to speak about the war time with my parents. Interestingly enough he was a linguist and could speak German, French, Italian, and English with an American accent from the midwestern states. I can only speculate why he went to the United States, but nevertheless, as soon as the war ended he quickly returned to Germany where he would live out the rest of his life in the suburbs of Munich. Aside from Great Uncle Max there were several other relatives that served in the German military but unfortunately did not survive.

As for myself I played several hockey seasons in Germany and after spending 4 years over there my curiosity only grew as to what really happened between WW1 until the end of WW2. I was especially fortunate for some documents I received from my Great Uncle Maximilian during my 4th hockey season over there. One of the documents from Max I was given was the paper that showed where he is buried. The crazy thing was in my 2nd hockey season in Germany I lived across the street from the Westfriedhof Cemetary in Munich and the whole time I lived there I had absolutely no idea that that was where my Great Uncle Maximilian was buried. So it was a major coincidence and naturally I went back to this cemetary to finally pay my respects.

RadicalPress.com: I note in the CTV Vancouver story that they included the token “holocaust survivor” who, par for the course, has to tell the world (again and again) about all the “horrors” of the “concentration” camps (actually work camps) where they once again draw their “ace” propaganda card out of their sleeve and continue to spread the greatest lie of the 20th century, i.e. that “6 Million” Jews were gassed and then fried in ovens in places like Auschwitz. Given what you have learned about the true history of the period and the fact that the only verifiable record of deaths in the work camps was by the International Red Cross who stated that the number was well below half a million and the causes were from Typhus and starvation how do you perceive these ongoing propaganda lies about there having been “6 Million Jews” intentionally murdered?

Chris S: This amazing claim that 6 million Jews were intentionally murdered is quite astounding. According to the Jewish Almanac, the Jewish population actually increased during the period of WW2. My feeling at this point is that there was no such plan to exterminate the Jewish people. If there was such a plan, why would the Germans go to the trouble of shaving everyone’s head before sending them into the alleged gas chambers? Next why would hundreds of people standing outside the alleged chambers put up zero resistance when they could hear people screaming inside the chambers before eventually succumbing to the deadly gas, especially when the inmates outnumbered the guards by 100 to 1 according to the 7 or 8 Jewish witnesses that seemed to always appear at every holocaust revisionist trial? Also why is it always the same 7 or 8 Jewish witnesses that testify at all the revisionist trials? Of the thousands of so called holocaust survivors, why don’t any of the other survivors ever testify? Some of these camps didn’t even have enough German staff on hand to man the camps so they had to hire Jewish people to work as staff members in the camps. For some reason mainstream historians leave out the fact there were Typhus epidemics in the camps due to lice infestations and the German staff was doing all they could to prevent the typhus from killing everyone in the camps. Not to mention towards the end of the war there were terrible food shortages that made it difficult to feed all the inmates. Many civilians were suffering from the food shortages as well. Also when you visit the so called concentration camps today you see absolutey no staining on the walls left from the gas anywhere in those shower rooms. Yet when you take a peak inside the very small fumigation chambers there’s traces of the Zyklon B gas everywhere. These fumigation chambers were used to delouse all the inmates clothing, bed sheets, blankets, etc as they needed to kill all the lice. The crematories were built so that they could cremate bodies that had been infected with Typhus. As they found when they buried these infected bodies in the ground, the disease would leech through the soil and into the local water supply which in turn made many of the folks living nearby sick. There is really so much that needs to be continuously asked as the official story just doesn’t seem to add up.

RadicalPress.com: I suppose it’s fair to ask Chris whether you were truly taken by surprise when all this negative publicity suddenly came about? We often see individual’s pages on Facebook being taken down by those who run it (the Jews) because they don’t approve of something and it’s inevitably something that paints them in a negative, albeit truthful light. Did you, up until it all exploded in your face, ever think that it would actually happen to you?

Chris S: To be honest I was aware I could lose my job but sometimes there are more important things in life than teaching people how to shoot a little black rubber disc into a 6×4 sized net. However, I did not foresee getting all of this media attention as I didn’t expect anyone to contact any media over this. It just shows how low some people will go when they don’t like who you really are. They clearly would much rather you just fall in line like everyone else and go through life believing in the lies just as they do.

RadicalPress.com: When the North Delta Minor Hockey Association gave you an ultimatum to either remove or hide your Facebook page you, courageously stood your ground and refused to bow down to their pressure. Can you tell readers why you decided to stand up for what you believed in rather than surrender your principles for the sake of keeping your job?

Chris S: Again, as I said earlier, sometimes there are more important moments in life than worrying about Hockey even if its my job or not. Standing up for what I believe in is far more important. I’d rather be hated for who I am than loved for something I am not.

RadicalPress.com: Up until this incident took place Chris did you realize just how brainwashed the general public is when it comes to understanding the real history of National Socialist Germany? Were you in any way prepared for the media frenzy that ensued after a parent laid a complaint against you?

Chris S:  Indeed I was aware of the brainwashing but I was hoping that people that know the type of person I am, would look further into the information I was presenting. Especially, when the folks that know me, know that I am the complete opposite of a violent person. I was actually taken by surprise when I first recieved a call from the Surrey Now Newspaper to do an interview.

RadicalPress.com: Those who have studied the real history of Adolf Hitler and the era of National Socialism know with a high degree of certainty just how false the history is that appears in the Zionist media, be it their newspapers or tv or Hollywood or the endless tabloids and magazines that constantly keep harping on about the “Nazis” and how terrible Adolf Hitler was. I even read in the  Surrey Now a quote from an unidentified parent where they said: “You can’t be a Nazi and coach kids hockey.” Can you tell readers why you choose to not use that term when speaking of National Socialists and why you find it personally offensive?

Chris S: The word Nazi is truly a derogatory word. It is like using the K word to describe a Jewish person or the N word to describe a black man, etc. The word Nazi is attached only to a completely negative meaning being that it defines you as evil and that you want to harm people of other races and religions and that you want to rule the world. The goal of National Socialists was to promote the love of one’s race and heritage meanwhile respecting all other races. There was never such a goal in place to exterminate other races and dominate the world. It’s funny how all of the evil talk has been placed on the National Socialists. If you take a step back and look at whats going on today, you will see it is the Zionist controlled USA that is slowly occupying one country after the next. I think I heard someone say the other day that WW2 was the war to end all wars, yet the USA hasn’t stop fighting wars since. Not to mention Israel hasn’t stopped killing the Palestinians since. 

RadicalPress.com: Thank you Chris for taking the time to speak with RadicalPress.com. Your courage and willingness to stand up for the principles you believe in are most laudable and a good example to the younger generations of Canadians who no doubt are also finding out the real truth about Hitler and NS Germany thanks to the efforts of people such as yourself.

~END~

* A special thanks to Trevor LaBonte for his part in connecting RadicalPress.com up with Chris Sandau.

 

Politically Incorrect Truths About History, Current Events Surface in Sea of Information By Trevor LaBonte

TrevorLaBonteHistoryHdr

Politically Incorrect Truths About History, Current Events Surface in Sea of Information

By

Trevor LaBonte

July 28, 2014

As the internationalist Zionist banking cabal/world shadow government laments the recent developments with Putin’s Crimea referendum and also the establishment of the BRICS bank to circumvent the previously unipolar financial system, it must also be lamenting its loss of control of the popular historical narrative which was, until recently, effectively controlled by Zionist interests via their monopoly on publishing. The internet has evolved, people have fingers, and, well, millions of people worldwide seem to be reaching a solid consensus as to what a more accurate and unbiased account of history and current events might be, absent the propagandizing of said interests.

For starters, Benjamin Freedman’s 1961 speech at the Willard Hotel, is widely available online, and it blows the lid completely off of the fact that the aforementioned European Jewish banking cabal/shadow government made an illegal secret deal with the British government wherein Britain was enticed into promising Palestine to the Rothschilds, the head family of international banking, in return for the Zionists utilizing their media monopoly in the United States to, using made-up stories to demonize Germany, persuade Americans to jump into WW I. Imagine if everyone fully grasped that the fact that a few Zionists in a back-room deal managed to get millions of people killed under false pretenses, just so they could obtain Palestine, a country which did not even belong to Britain to begin with.

Freedman also details how the “Treaty of Versailles” was yet another product of pure bankster intrigue, wherein Germany, who entered WW I because of mutual defense treaties, was made to pay all reparations for the entire war, and was cut into pieces, having its appendages doled out to the surrounding countries, in an obvious attempt to destroy Germany’s ability to recover from the war. The shadow bankster government then had a real run for its money when the German people eventually responded by electing Adolf Hitler, who promptly set the German economy back on track, eradicated unemployment, and showed the world what was possible in absence of Rothschild debt slavery. Germans went from living in hovels and having to pay billions of marks for a loaf of bread, to having good jobs in production, the Autobahn, paid vacations, and Volkswagens (designed by Hitler and Dr. Ferdinand Porsche, complete with a genuine Tesla coil) for only five marks per week. Nevertheless, the zionist domination of media [http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=2334] and academia [http://www.academia.org/the-origins-of-political-correctness/] managed to thoroughly propagandize the entire story and convince the entire world that Adolf Hitler was the most fearsome dictator in all history, when in reality he was only an elected populist leader who, by the way, enjoyed a 95% approval rating from his people.

Also the kosher narrative of WW II has fallen completely to pieces. It used to be that Hitler’s repeated, generous peace offers were never mentioned, but instead, people were relentlessly bombarded by mainstream media and academia with absurdly distorted propaganda blaming Hitler for starting the war. Meanwhile, internet sources such as [http://justice4germans.com] tell a totally different version which illustrates to truth seekers that mainstream sources are demonstrating a systematic concealment of a number of key factors, including an internationally supervised popular referendum with the people of Danzig voting nearly 99% in favor of rejoining the Reich, ignored by the Rothschild-influenced Polish government, which led to Germany’s invasion, and two days later, a British and French declaration of war on Germany. Throughout the mainstream narrative is woven a hollow and monotonous theme of “anti-Semitism,” with no mention of the fact that Germany was fighting a 100% defensive war against the international banking elite who, as it turns out, created and funded the Bolshevik “revolution” and populated its leadership ranks with 85% Jews, who, in turn, killed 60+ million mainly white Russian Christians, out of nothing but deep ethnic hatred combined with limitless funding and help from the B’nai B’rith Jewish-only Freemasonic headquarters in New York City. But remember, Hitler is the bad guy for fighting against this international jewish conspiracy.

The internet has also allowed some very interesting facts regarding the mainstream Holocaust narrative to rise to the surface. People are now learning of the works of historians such as Robert Faurisson, Fred Leuchter, Germar Rudolph, and many others who are making millions of people aware of the total lack of any physical evidence for the alleged “Nazi gassings” of “Six million Jews.” Also lacking is any documentary evidence of any policy, plan, budget, blueprints, autopsies of gassing victims, and it has been revealed that the entire Holocaust narrative is based only on a few paid “eyewitnesses” whose very testimonies prove that they had never even seen a gassing, being that they testified that the corpses turned blue, when with a little more effort on their part, they could have made their stories more believable by at least stating the correct color that would have resulted from cyanide gasses: bright cherry red. Combining the total lack of physical evidence with the evidence of phony witness testimony, the color of the lies becomes transparent. Sound crazy? It should! at first, but scratch the surface of the scholarly field know as “Holocaust Revisionism” (or perhaps it is more accurately called “history”) more closely and the lies evaporate before your eyes. But don’t take this author’s word for it. Try to find one shred of actual evidence that a single Jew was gassed. You can’t do it. Even Raul Hilberg, author of “The Destruction of the European Jew” 3-volume set, could not produce any evidence when called as an “expert witness” at the 1985 Ernst Zundel trial. (Insert record scratch sound effect here.) The general public has not figured this out yet, but internet truth-seekers have! [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZbBWIx1AhAU]

The lack of “gassings” evidence factored in with the preponderance of baseless Holocaust propaganda from the 8 Jewish-controlled Hollywood movie studios, Jewish publishing houses, and Jewish censored academic institutions have led truth seekers to universally conclude something which has shocked each discoverer: That the international banksters that founded these institutions  invented the extermination hoax as a brainwashing tool to discourage people from criticizing the inordinate amount of Jewish influence we see all around us, to extort billions from Germany, and to utilize as an essential myth in the founding of Israel in 1948.

Jumping ahead a bit, this shadow government cabal held a successful coup against the United States on Nov 22, 1963, when it assassinated JFK over a secret diplomatic battle he was having with “Israel” on their illegal nukes and for his efforts to force the Jewish lobby, then called The American Zionist Council, to register under the Foreign Agent Registration Act, which would have ended its ability to control congress altogether. Undoubtedly, he was not a fan of the FED either. Yes, they killed JFK too. Read his letters to Ben-Gurion, archived here [http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/US-Israel/FRUS5_18_63.html] and ask yourself why these motives have never been explored in the controlled media. Also recommended highly is Michael Collins Piper’s book, “Final Judgement,” the only book brave enough to trace connections from the Israeli Mossad through James Jesus Angleton to the CIA, Meyer Lansky, and the Jewish organized crime syndicate know as “Murder, Inc.”

Having assassinated Kennedy, and with America now totally under its control, Rothschild’s Israel then tried to draw America into its so-called “Six-Day War” of zionist expansionism by way of perpetrating a false-flag attack on the USS Liberty, intending to blame the attack on Egypt. They botched the operation by failing to sink the Liberty, and at this point, the war for Israeli expansionism was temporarily put on hold. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=fFQrsdj7BLs]

The Israeli Defense Force did try and was defeated twice, at the hands of the Islamic Resistance of HizbAllah, to permanently occupy Lebanon, and it became clear that they could get nowhere in their plan to absorb their neighbors into “Greater Israel” without help from the US, but how could this be achieved?

Then, like someone un-pausing a video tape, the war for Israeli expansionism suddenly resumed on Sept. 11, 2001, when the Israelis collaborated with corrupt neocons in the US government, staging yet another in a long list of Israeli false-flags against the US to be blamed on Muslims.

This operation, like the USS Liberty attack, was badly botched when one of the planes did not reach its target, and WTC 7 collapsed at free-fall speed perfectly into its own footprint for apparently no reason, but in reality it was to prevent anyone from finding out that, like WTC 1 and 2, WTC 7 had been pre-rigged for demolition. We even have Larry Silverstein (not a Muslim with a box cutter) on a PBS documentary admitting that he brought WTC 7 down HIMSELF on 9/11, as well as Frank Mineta’s testimony of neo-Cohen Dick Cheney barking orders to maintain the NORAD stand-down which is what allowed the other planes to reach their targets. Just for fun, picture a terrorist coming at you with a box cutter. What would you do? I think I would laugh at him. It seems the architects of the 9/11 cover story received their training originally from watching Hollywood B, C, or D-movies. At any rate, the documented evidence of Israeli involvement was largely suppressed once again due to zionist control of the media, but not before reporters like Carl Cameron exposed the Israeli spies, the Mossad truck bombs, and other things that suspicion of anything other than Israel sound silly.

Muslims were framed and demonized as always, and full scale war was waged on the Middle East in perfect accord with Israeli foreign policy advisor Oded Yinon’s ambitious 1982 policy paper, which outlines the plan to balkanize the surrounding nations in the Middle East for expansionism of the Jewish State which would then rule the world in a Jewish NWO.

Vladimir Putin stymied the Greater Israel project when he exposed and countered a big part of the zionist plot against the Syrian government, and the false flag at Ghouta did not fly. Syria is an extremely important link in the chain, because not only is it openly slated to become part of “Greater Israel,” but it’s leadership in Bashar al Assad simultaneously provides arms to aid in the Palestinian resistance and connects Palestine with Iran which is then connected to Russia. The battle is not over yet to establish a New World Order where gentile nations are slaves to a “Jewish state” which regards gentiles as sub-humans as per the Jewish religion , and the jews use the Samson Option and blow up the planet with nuclear bombs if their openly racist, genocidal project somehow goes awry. Crimea and BRICS threaten the NWO, and a third prong consisting of the availability of “alternative” history sources which allow real truth seekers to circumvent attempts to conceal politically incorrect facts which are facts nonetheless, is rising, and it seems this “alternative” version is the only one that puts the whole puzzle together into a coherent picture, revealing starkly who has been cloaking themselves and running the show, creating world wars, manufacturing depressions and economic crashes with a phone call, the flick of a pen, or entering a few zeroes into a computer.

—–

Bad Moon Rising: How the Jewish Lobbies Created Canada’s “Hate Propaganda” Laws by Arthur Topham

BadMoonRisingHeader 800 copy 4

 

Bad Moon Rising: 

How the Jewish Lobbies Created Canada’s “Hate Propaganda” Laws

By 

Arthur Topham

“Therefore whosoever heareth these sayings of mine, and doeth them,
I will liken him unto a wise man, which built his house upon a rock:
And the rain descended, and the floods came, and the winds blew, and
beat upon that house; and it fell not: for it was founded upon a rock.
And everyone that heareth these sayings of mine, and doeth them not,
Shall be likened unto a foolish man, which built his house upon the sand:
And the rain descended, and the floods came, and the winds blew, and
Beat upon that house; and it fell: and great was the fall of it.”
~ Jesus Christ, St. Matthew Ch. 7, vs 24 -27

 

My assertion, as stated in the title to this article, that Canada’s judicial system has been infiltrated and co-opted by foreign Zionist Jew lobby groups operating in Canada since 1919, will automatically be met with a loud hue and cry of “preposterous! outrageous!” followed immediately by much hand-wringing and declamations of “anti-Semitism”,”hate”,”racism” and further punctuated, dramatized and broadcast across the nation via the the Zionist-controlled mainstream media.

So be it. It doesn’t detract one iota from the facts. All such reactionary responses only reinforce the premise of my argument that Canada’s Zionist Jew media cartel is, and always has been, an integral part of their overall plan to formulate and establish Orwellian laws inimical to the rights and freedoms of the people. Frankly stated it’s the modus operandi of these foreign-controlled Jewish lobbies to react precisely in this fashion for that is how they mendaciously twist and stifle debate on any issue of national importance to Canadians; be it our Charter rights or our fundamental right (and responsibility as patriotic protectors of our country) to question the direction of the nation’s foreign policies which, under the current Harper regime, are deliberately replacing the nation’s longstanding principles of common sense and aligning our once relatively respected political ideals with the present agenda of the Zionist Jewish state of Israel, considered by most intelligent people to be the most rogue, racist, supremacist, violent, atheistic and apartheid nation on the face of the planet.

It’s my fervent contention that the template for Canada’s “Hate Propaganda” legislation was, from the start, designed in such a way as to function as a legal shield; a mechanism which the Zionist lobbyists use to defend themselves against any allegations aimed at exposing their covert actions; all of which are meant to benefit their inordinate influence over Canadian politics and the criminal actions of the foreign state of Israel; Harper, of course, being their current Trojan Horse, front man in this deliberate, ongoing, slow motion coup to capture the nation’s political and legal systems.

When we go back in history and retrace the steps that these legal interlopers have taken since the end of World War 2 it’s clearly evident what they’ve been up to, especially in light of the now increasing displeasure that more and more Canadians are showing toward the actions of the Jewish lobbies when it comes to their relentless, telling attacks upon our Charter of Rights and Freedoms which include our fundamental right to freedom of expression as stated in Sec. 2b of the Charter.

For those still unfamiliar with this fundamental right it states:

2. Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms:

(b) freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication.

All that’s required in order to verify this war against our rights and freedoms, including our most basic right of speaking out and expressing our views on issues vital to our national well being, is to delve into any and all of the legal cases over the past forty four years associated with the issue of freedom of expression and one will see immediately that in practically every instance the first special interest lobby group lining up and vying for intervenor status is inevitably a Jewish one. And furthermore, concomitant with their zealousness to intervene is usually the underlying fact that it is they themselves who were instrumental in bringing forth the charges. And if that isn’t the norm then they’re undoubtedly there to make sure that the complainant (usually an agent in one form or another) gets the maximum support of their power and influence in the courts and the media.

The foundation for all of this pretense and deceit was laid at the end of the last world war when the Zionist-controlled U.K. and USA began cranking up their deliberately orchestrated accusations that Hitler and the German military were guilty of having attempted to wipe out the Jews in Europe by gassing millions of them and then cremating the innocent souls in ovens to cover up their horrendously heinous crime. The Nuremberg Trials at the war’s end were the focus of these fantastic claims of willful genocide by gas and fire and the West, still mesmerized by the massive amounts of anti-German hate propaganda which they had been saturated with for the past six years, as well as being shell-shocked from all the fighting, killing, bombing and destruction, fell prey to this massive deception and was unwilling or unable to garner the moral fortitude or financial resources necessary to counter these outrageous lies of the powerful Zionist lobby.

Little did it matter that every confession by the captured German military commanders had been gained by torture. Little did it matter that the majority of those running the trials were of Jewish ethnicity. Little did it matter that laws which had been followed by nations for decades were suddenly revised in secrecy just prior to the war’s end and the former International Geneva protocols cast aside and new standards of jurisprudence abruptly introduced into the equation by Jewish judges and the Zionist forces who had gained firm control of the whole charade. This was the hour that they’d planned for and were awaiting since first declaring war on Germany in 1933 when Hitler and the National Socialist Party gained power through legal, democratic means.

Now that the Allies had gained their victory, the Zionists via subterfuge, deception, political pressure and the willing assistance of their controlled media and Hollywood, were finally in a position to have their long sought “6 Million Jewish Holocaust” footings poured, thus assuring themselves of a firm propaganda foundation for the erection of their fabricated phantasy; one that would then allowing for the rest of the subsequent monkey business of taking over and manipulating national and international laws, all of which was based upon their cunningly crafted pretext for tyranny known as the “Holocaust”.

After that landmark lie was accomplished it was merely a matter of time, patient plodding, and endless, inordinate propaganda and pressure placed upon the rest of the population of the world who had still to accept the “Holocaust” hoax and be subsequently convinced of the dire and urgent necessity for enacting legislation that would make it illegal to promote either “genocide” or “hatred” toward any identifiable group.

In principle (and of course based upon the lie of the “6 Million”) these proposals might have appeared laudable and worthy had the mythical “Holocaust” actually occurred and in that context they would most definitely have been noble pursuits to accomplish but that, unfortunately, wasn’t the reality. Only now that the real history of the last eighty years is finally coming to light, thanks to the free and open Internet, are we finally getting to see the original, unadulterated script as it was so cleverly designed by the Zionist forces of the day; a program of diabolic, Machiavellian political pragmatism designed to destroy democratic institutions and replace them with a Zionist-based illuminist, occult vision of a macabre New World Order where they, and only they, would hold all the power and control over the world’s people along with all the resources of the planet.

Such was the set and setting here in Canada when the Jewish lobbies started their underhanded campaign to create “Hate Propaganda” laws that would be and are being used against Canadian citizens today.

One might legitimately say that these deceptive measures to control freedom of speech actually began even before the commencement of WW2. After Hitler and the National Socialist Party came to power in 1933 the Jews in Canada were already growing fearful that Canadians might begin to believe what Germany was saying about the International financiers and the Jewish control of their own beleaguered nation and so in the province of Manitoba, (of all places) the government passed a statute to combat what was apparently perceived to be a “rise in the dissemination of Nazi propaganda”. The premise of which (The Libel Act, R.S.M. 1913, c. 113, s. 13A (added S.M. 1934, c. 23, s. 1) was later to become The Defamation Act, R.S.M. 1987, c. D20, s. 19(1) and was in all likelihood the first volley launched against freedom of expression.

Up until 1970 Section 181 of the Criminal Code, which reads: “Every one who wilfully publishes a statement, tale or news that he knows is false and that causes or is likely to cause injury or mischief to a public interest is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years.” was the only provision in the Code even remotely connected to the offence of group defamation but it didn’t, at the time, specifically make mention of “hate propaganda”.

As stated above, when WW2 ended the work of the Zionist lobbyists began in earnest when their “Holocaust” card began appearing as the foundational pretext to any and all discussions surrounding “human rights” and “discrimination”. The first step in the direction of censorship was the United Nations’ Universal Declaration of Human Rights in 1948 with its references to “hate propaganda” and by 1953 we find that the Canadian Jewish Congress was already diligently pursuing efforts toward this end with their attempt to insert anti-hate propaganda provisions into the Criminal Code which was being revised in that same year.

Their deceptive labours eventually bore fruit when the lobby was finally able to convince Canada’s federal Justice Minister Guy Favreau in 1965 to appoint a special (interest) committee to look into the purported “problems” connected with the dissemination of “hate propaganda” in Canada.

Surprisingly (not) what became known as “The Special Committee on Hate Propaganda in Canada” and later abbreviated (for propaganda purposes) to the “Cohen Committee” was headed by a Jewish lawyer, Dean Maxwell Cohen, Q.C., Dean of the Faculty of Law, McGill University. While not all members of the committee were Jewish there was one other notable lawyer instrumental in aiding the Jewish lobby in their relentless quest for censorship laws. This was none other than Professor Pierre E. Trudeau, Associate Professor of Law, University of Montreal, soon to become Canada’s Prime Minister.

The committee studied the alleged “problem” from January 29th to November 10th, 1965 and their conclusions called for new legislation that ultimately affected the Post Office Act, the Customs Act, and most critically in today’s context, what is now Section 319 of the Criminal Code, the very same section that’s being used to shut down RadicalPress.com and threaten its Publisher and Editor (me) with a possible two year jail sentence for having expressed opinions and facts on Zionism, Jews and the state of Israel.

My case is designed to be the test case for the Jewish lobbyists working in Canada. Should they win and find me guilty under Sec. 319(2) of the Criminal Code of Canada then that precedent will undoubtedly unleash a flood of subsequent attacks upon the rest of the bloggers and publishers and writers and artists living in Canada who also see an imminent threat to their freedom of expression encapsulated in this draconian, Marxist legislation designed with malicious forethought to censor truth and stymie any and all attempts to achieve and maintain justice and freedom of speech in Canada.

Conclusion:

Just as the great parable of Jesus Christ regarding the foolish man who built his house upon the sand has come down through history so too has the foolish attempt by those who call themselves Jews to build an occult house of invisible governance upon the sands of deception, usury and an insatiable lust for power and control over their fellow mortals.

Now that the rains of the peoples’ outrageous indignation and the floods of perceived injustice and repression of personal freedoms and the winds of Truth and Freedom are beginning to beat with greater and greater intensity upon the once mighty and powerful House of Zion (thanks to the miracle of the Internet), the underpinnings of this deceptive, age-old hoax are giving way and, should the people continue to unite and persevere in their staunch resistance to and abolition of all the “Hate Propaganda” laws now being used against them then soon, and with great relief and thankfulness, will come the fall of this House of Horrors and a new beginning for those who want only peace and love and justice and brotherhood to reign supreme.

—-

 

Auch Mein Kampf (My Struggle Too) by Arthur Topham

AuchMeinKampfNew600 copy

 

Screen Shot 2014-03-24 at 12.43.31 PM

 Auch Mein Kampf
(My Struggle Too)

By
Arthur Topham
March 24th, 2014

 

The pursuit of truth is never an easy path. Every man and every woman who has ever struggled to understand their place in the world and the reasons for why things are as they are will attest to the fundamental veracity of such a statement.  From the moment of that first conscious step along the endless journey of searching out Life’s mysteries the work begins, and it rarely ceases until one’s last breath has been taken. 

Such, I believe, was the case with Adolf Hitler in his own natural pursuit of understanding when, as a young and budding artist, he was forced by life’s exigencies to face and question the economic and political realities of life in Austria during the beginning stages of the 20 century. And so it remains today for multitudes, if not millions of souls, who also are being coerced by current circumstances into asking the very same questions of life that this historic figure once did. It is in this sense that I wish to draw a parallel between my own political unfoldment and that of Adolf Hitler and, in the process, try to reveal how Adolf’s struggle to understand what the world perceives as the “Jewish Question” was my struggle too and how my personal revelations respecting this ongoing phenomenon inevitably (as I later learned), turned out to be synonymous with his.

I must, in stating the above (and I believe I can state this with a high degree of confidence), also add that in my own case, after close to five decades of perseverance beginning at age 20, that this process of coming to terms with the Jewish Question is not in any way unique to myself but, in fact, is the case for anyone who sincerely strives to discern fact from fiction and truth from intentional deception in a world of duality that, by its very nature, inevitably forces the truth seeker to search for reasons for why things are as they are.

That said I wish to begin with a brief outline of my own life that will lead directly into the current topic of discussion.

In many respects I led a simple, normal life from birth until early manhood; one unencumbered by any of a multitude of possible scenarios wherein a child might have been negatively affected to the point that their subsequent growth might easily have been overshadowed by either physical, mental, emotional or sexual abuse, sickness, extreme religious indoctrination, family breakup or any of a myriad number of possibilities wherein their natural development could have suffered retardation in one form or another.

When I graduated from high school at the age of eighteen I was, for the most part, a regular, acceptable member of the society of my day albeit with a nascent streak of the rebel already present in my personality. My health was intact; my sexuality was normal; my moral fibre was of a nature that might best be described as that of a small “c” Christian and my intellectual capacities were well within the accepted parameters of the time.

I had been born in the late forties and up to the mid-fifties raised on a small farm in the central region of the Canadian prairies and had virtually no experience with urban living during that period of my growth. I was in a very real sense one of Mother Nature’s sons. When the year 1956 drew to a close my rural life ended with the sale of our farm and my family relocated to British Columbia to a northern coastal community called Kitimat where my father had found employment in what was then one of Canada’s newest and boldest economic undertakings by the Aluminum Company of Canada aka Alcan.

My arrival in Kitimat marked a pivotal point in what would later become a life time preoccupation with political pursuits in general but in particular with my involvement with things Germanic.

Just how this came about is still in some respects a mystery to me but the setting in which my interest in things related to Germany first became apparent was due to the time and place in which I then found myself. The second world war had ended only eleven years prior to my relocation to Canada’s latest “instant” city carved out of wilds of the West coast rainforest and because of the nature of the development itself there was a need for a large number of workers to fill the positions that suddenly became available with the advent of a major industrial project such as Kitimat then was.

This need translated into a massive influx of immigrants from Europe to fill the quota of required manpower and thus the new town became, in a very real and practically sense almost overnight, a miniature version of a European city composed of racial or ethnic elements from most, if not all, of the major nations from that region of the globe. The most predominant countries represented were Germany, Italy, Portugal, Hungary and the U.K. followed by a lesser assortment of Slavic countries and the Nordic nations of Sweden, Norway and Iceland. In other words Kitimat, from its onset, became a microcosm of European identities all bundled up together and situated in a veritable wilderness where, prior to then, only the First Nation Haisla people had lived from time immemorial.

I was in Grade Four when I moved to this small city and from then on I attended school with this broad, heterogeneous assortment of kids who, for the most part, were still learning to speak English when they first entered their Canadian classrooms. In fact, the English speaking students and their parents at that time were a minority in the city. It was there that I began my lifelong association with the German people.

In the fall of 1965, having achieved grades sufficient to permit me to enter an institution of higher learning, I applied to begin general studies at the newly created Simon Fraser University in Burnaby, B.C. an institution which opened its doors for the first time that very same year. I packed up my bags, hopped into my 1956 VW “bug” and wended my way down the province to the southern coast to begin my new academic life.

My parents were never affluent and so it was necessary for me to apply for student loans in order to survive. As well I had Ukrainian relatives from my mother’s side of the family who were living in the Vancouver area and so I was able to take up residence with one of my aunts and my maternal Grandmother and begin my studies.

Simon Fraser University (SFU) at that time was Canada’s newest and most controversial universities of the day. When I applied for admission I knew nothing about its origins or organization other than what I had gleaned from all the coloured brochures that were published to promote it. What was apparent though (and again, I was much too ignorant of the political system at that time to realize it) was the fact that the university was staffed by a rather large contingent of professors and academics who, for lack of a better term, might best be classified as Marxists in one form or another. Many came from the USA but others also arrived from the U.K. bearing credentials from prestigious Marxist institutions such as the London School of Economics. One of my professors at that period was the renowned Marxist sociologist Thomas Burton Bottomore, who was head of the Department of Political Science, Sociology and Anthropology at SFU from 1965 to 1967.

It was this stage of my life that most closely resembled that of Adolf Hitler’s own political unfoldment as contained in Chapter 2 of his autobiography, Mein Kampf (My Struggle) and titled “Years of Study and Suffering in Vienna”.

In Adolf’s case he had arrived in Vienna hoping to enter Art school to become a painter but for reasons now apparent Fate held another path for the young aspiring artist and his plans were suddenly dashed leaving him on his own to survive and refocus on a career in Architecture; one that would involve living impoverished in Vienna. It was, as he described it, “during this period that my eyes were opened to two perils, the names of which I scarcely knew hitherto and had no notion whatsoever of their terrible significance for the existence of the German people. These two perils were Marxism and Judaism.”

That one statement alone might easily encapsulate all of what has transpired in my own life over the past forty-nine years since entering SFU. Up until then the only “Marx” that I’d ever been even vaguely aware of was Groucho Marx, leader of the Marx Brothers Hollywood comedy act. Whatever history lessons that I had attended throughout high school obviously hadn’t prepared me for what was forthcoming at the university level.

And so much of my academic life was steeped in Marxist indoctrination from the onset and I, in my naiveté did my best to soak it up in order to maintain my Grade Point Average and move from semester to semester on my way to a degree which I hadn’t, as yet, even determined.

The Sixties, as most now recognize, was a period of intense political and spiritual upheaval, not only in B.C. but around the world and as a result of all of the unexpected changes the minds of many of the youth of the day were affected in ways that might best be described by the term “radical”. Like an unannounced bolt of lightning from out of a clear blue sky the youth of the Sixties were suddenly introduced to an intense period of political unrest coupled with the strange and mystifying world of psychedelic drugs, a factor that would ultimately end up playing a major role in subsequent changes to both the cultural and spiritual unfoldment of generations to come. It was a world in which I too would soon be immersed but before those changes occurred I had already acquired a certain prescience of mind with respect to the actual substance and intent of the Marxist ideology that I’d been so assiduously studying for the past two years at university.

One incident best describes what I mean. As with all universities, as a student I was constantly wondering about from class to class, passing by wall after wall and window after window covered with whatever propaganda the young and inquisitive minds of students had posted there to gain the attention of the world. One particular poster made mention of a meeting being held in the downtown east side of Vancouver organized by a group of Marxist Leninists. Being at the time familiar with them thanks to the indoctrination in my Political Science classes I decided to attend and see what was going on. When I arrived at the venue and milled about anonymously observing the posters and books and listening to the rhetoric of those present I suddenly began experiencing what might best be described as a gut feeling or an intuitive sense of something dark and sinister lurking within the atmosphere of the small crowd of Marxist adherents present in the room. It must have made a very poignant impression on me for afterwards I never forgot it and was also never able to feel a positive connection with the doctrine from that point on.

In Adolf’s predicament, respecting the two “perils” of Marxism and Judaism he states, “It is impossible to say when I might have started to make a thorough study of the doctrine and characteristics of Marxism were it not for the fact that I then literally ran head foremost into the problem.” The “problem” as it turned out was the influential Social Democratic Party of his day and his eventual awakening to its aims and intentions and to those who were controlling its inner workings.

And so it was this small, seemingly incidental experience with a meeting of a group of Marxist Leninists that I now relate to Hitler’s experiences with the Social Democratic Party (albeit in much greater detail) and which first made me wary of all things Marxist but, in terms of Adolf’s second “peril”, Judaism, that one would remain an enigma for decades to come before I finally was able to fit the piece into the puzzle making the picture complete. In fact, in the case of Judaism, I truly never made the connection until around thirty years after than incident in east Vancouver.

Adolf, on the other hand, having to forego his passion to become an artist and also having to survive somehow in Vienna, turned to working as a labourer in the building trades. It was then that he began encountering the actual effects of the Marxists and their ideology and how it played upon the workmen of his time. Soon after finding work he was forced to join a “trades union” in order to continue working and once in the union he was then surrounded by workers whose on the job discussions inevitably revolved around Marxist rhetoric; rhetoric that Adolf had to endure listening to over and over; rhetoric that consisted of repeated attacks upon all the things that he held dear to his heart.

As he put it, “I drank my bottle of milk and ate my morsel of bread somewhere on the outskirts, while I circumspectly studied my environment or else fell to meditating on my own harsh lot. Yet I heard more than enough. And I often thought that some of what they said was meant for my ears, in the hope of bringing me to a decision. But all that I heard had the effect of arousing the strongest antagonism in me. Everything was disparaged – the nation, because it was held to be an invention of the ‘capitalist’ class (how often I had to listen to that phrase!); the Fatherland, because it was held to be an instrument in the hands of the bourgeoisie for the exploitation of the working masses; the authority of the law, because that was a means of holding down the proletariat; religion, as a means of doping the people, so as to exploit them afterwards; morality, as a badge of stupid and sheepish docility. There was nothing that they did not drag in the mud.”

Eventually the endless bashing of Adolf’s ideals prompted him to join in the discussions in order to argue against the Marxist dogma of doom and gloom. That went on for a period of time until Adolf, determined to understand his subject and having studied in detail the literature, was able to advance his arguments to the point where the Marxists of his day were unable to refute his position. This inevitably led to a situation that is all too familiar. As Adolf described it, “From day to day I was becoming better informed than my companions in the subjects on which they claimed to be experts. Then a day came when the more redoubtable of my adversaries resorted to the most effective weapon they had to replace the force of reason. This was intimidation and physical force. Some of the leaders among my adversaries ordered me to leave the building or else get flung down from the scaffolding. As I was quite alone I could not put up any physical resistance; so I chose the first alternative and departed, richer however by the experience. I went away full of disgust; but at the same time so deeply moved that it was quite impossible for me to turn my back on the whole situation and think no more about it.”

As time passed Adolf continued studying in depth the behaviour of the Social Democracy Party and made it a priority to search out what he described as the “inner nature” of its doctrines. That of course, as with all things political in the modern era, inevitably led to only one eventual root cause and it was, therefore, at this juncture in both Adolf’s and my own quest for understanding of the political Gordian Knot, where we come to what is know historically as the “Jewish Question”.

Adolf put it best when first broaching the subject of who it was pulling the levers behind the facade of the Social Democratic Party for after some years of trying to discern the modus operandi of the Marxists and their control of the Social Democrats, he finally put two and two together and realized that what stood behind all of the doctrinaire rhetoric and literature of this gargantuan Marxist political monolith was a select group of individuals who were for the most part all adherents of a particular religion known as Judaism. It was that realization which prompted Hitler to state, “Knowledge of the Jews is the only key whereby one may understand the inner nature and therefore the real aims of Social Democracy.”

When I first began reading Mein Kampf a few years ago and reached the chapter which is the subject of this essay I was struck to the core of my being by the sudden knowledge of Adolf’s own personal awakening to the Jewish Question. Because of a lifetime immersed in a mental/intellectual atmosphere of thick, dark, maliciously impenetrable propaganda designed to force every young mind into believing that Adolf Hitler was the ultimate epitome of evil I had come to the conclusion years ago that Herr Hitler must have emerged, fully formed from the womb, a rabid and sinister anti-Semite who was already bashing his self-chosen brethren with his spoon while still seated in his high chair! Nothing less that such a conclusion could be drawn given the volumes of viperous vituperation and the multitude of morose and malevolently motivated Hollywood movies that constantly portrayed this consummate hater of Jews as the master of lies and the begetter of all bigotry toward God’s chosen people.

Now the truth had finally been revealed to me and I realized that my own awakening to this insidious deception so closely resembled that of Adolf’s that time literally stood still and in that instant realm of realization I understood not only Hitler’s soul but the soul of everyone who has come face to face with this eternal conundrum.

Adolf, in his precisely poignant language, describes how this process started:

“To-day it is hard and almost impossible for me to say when the word ‘Jew’ first began to raise any particular thought in my mind. I do not remember even having heard the word at home during my father’s lifetime. If this name were mentioned in a derogatory sense I think the old gentleman would just have considered those who used it in this way as being uneducated reactionaries. In the course of his career he had come to be more or less a cosmopolitan, with strong views on nationalism, which had its effect on me as well. In school, too, I found no reason to alter the picture of things I had formed at home.

“It was not until I was fourteen or fifteen years old that I frequently ran up against the word ‘Jew’, partly in connection with political controversies. These references aroused a slight aversion in me, and I could not avoid an uncomfortable feeling which always came over me when I had to listen to religious disputes. But at that time I had no other feelings about the Jewish question.

“There were very few Jews in Linz. In the course of centuries the Jews who lived there had become Europeanized in external appearance and were so much like other human beings that I even looked upon them as Germans. The reason why I did not then perceive the absurdity of such an illusion was that the only external mark which I recognized as distinguishing them from us was the practice of their strange religion. As I thought that they were persecuted on account of their Faith my aversion to hearing remarks against them grew almost into a feeling of abhorrence. I did not in the least suspect that there could be such a thing as a systematic anti-Semitism.

“Then I came to Vienna.

“I will not say that the manner in which I first became acquainted with it [the Jewish question. Ed.] was particularly unpleasant for me. In the Jew I still saw only a man who was of a different religion, and therefore, on grounds of human tolerance, I was against the idea that he should be attacked because he had a different faith. And so I considered that the tone adopted by the anti-Semitic Press in Vienna was unworthy of the cultural traditions of a great people. The memory of certain events which happened in the middle ages came into my mind, and I felt that I should not like to see them repeated. Generally speaking, these anti-Semitic newspapers did not belong to the first rank – but I did not then understand the reason of this – and so I regarded them more as the products of jealousy and envy rather than the expression of a sincere, though wrong-headed, feeling.

“My own opinions were confirmed by what I considered to be the infinitely more dignified manner in which the really great Press replied to those attacks or simply ignored them, which latter seemed to me the most respectable way.

“I diligently read what was generally called the World Press – Neue Freie Presse, Wiener Tageblatt, etc. – and I was astonished by the abundance of information they gave their readers and the impartial way in which they presented particular problems. I appreciated their dignified tone; but sometimes the flamboyancy of the style was unconvincing, and I did not like it. But I attributed all this to the overpowering influence of the world metropolis.”

These excerpts from Mein Kampf basically epitomize my own experience with respect to the Jews as I once perceived them. Like Adolf I had never had any dealings with them. I had grown up among Prairie farmers most of whom were either of British descent or else were German immigrants or Ukrainian Doukhobors of whom my mother was one. Even throughout my elementary and high school years I don’t recollect ever hearing about Jews and I also don’t recall there being any Jews in Kitimat although there may well have been the odd one in the form of a banker or a lawyer or a physician. My first actual encounter with a Jewish person was while at university when a fellow female student took a liking to me and we ended up communicating for a short while and she told me that she came from a Jewish family. At the time it meant nothing to me and the relationship never progressed beyond that of a brief acquaintanceship.

The ugly face of Zionism didn’t appeared before my eyes until around 1987 when, in the course of working on a letter to the local newspaper and researching information concerning the upheavals in Nicaragua and Guatemala, I came across and read Noam Chomsky’s pivotal book The Fateful Triangle: Israel, the United States and the Palestinians. That was my first glimpse of Israel, the ADL and the Zionist ideology.

Of course I wasn’t unaware of the problems going on in the Middle East at the time but all of the printed materials in the press of the day was so confusing that my mind simply turned away and avoided any attempt to fathom it all.

When I started my monthly tabloid The Radical in June of 1998 I was still relatively clueless on the main points with respect to Adolf Hitler and the National Socialist Party. In fact in various editions of the paper I would, at times, make reference to Hitler and the “nazis” in a negative manner simply because I was then under the Zionist-created illusion that had been drummed into my mind throughout my lifetime. Thank goodness that one of my German readers out in Ontario eventually wrote a “Letter to the Editor” in which they kindly implored me to take a second look at my thinking on the subject. When I published the letter in the next edition of the paper I began to get additional letters admonishing me to not change my former stance on Hitler and that’s when the light slowly began to break upon the horizon of my mind and skepticism on the subject of all that I had been brainwashed into believing about Germany and Adolf Hitler and the National Socialists began to take hold.

And so it was for Adolf Hitler a hundred years ago when he arrived in Vienna knowing little of the Zionist Jews and thinking that the “mainstream media” of his day – what he referred to as the “World Press” – was the best place to find impartial, independent journalistic reportage of political events.

But as time passed his regular study of the Vienna press began revealing discrepancies which made Adolf question their motives. One example in particular was the newspapers’ position on Germany’s then Emperor William II. A campaign was underway initiated by members of the Reichstag that angered Adolf immensely. Basically it prohibited William II from addressing parliament and, as Adolf viewed it, “The fact that the Emperor was prohibited from speaking in the Reichstag made me very angry, because the prohibition came from a side which in my eyes had no authority to make it. For at a single sitting those same parliamentary ganders did more cackling together than the whole dynasty of Emperors, comprising even the weakest, had done in the course of centuries.

It annoyed me to have to acknowledge that in a nation where any half-witted fellow could claim for himself the right to criticize and might even be let loose on the people as a ‘Legislator’ in the Reichstag, the bearer of the Imperial Crown could be the subject of a ‘reprimand’ on the part of the most miserable assembly of drivellers that had ever existed.”

Eventually Adolf began looking beyond the great Vienna Press at some of the other publications; ones which, at the time, he considered to be “anti-Semitic” in nature, in particular the Deutsche Volksblatt. But as it turned out it was in that publication that he came across the work of Dr. Karl Lueger and his Christian Socialist Movement. Setting aside his preconceived notions about the publication Adolf began reading about Leuger and as he later wrote, “even an elementary sense of justice enforced me to change my opinion when I had the opportunity of knowing the man and his work, and slowly that opinion grew into outspoken admiration when I had better grounds for forming a judgment. To-day, as well as then, I hold Dr. Karl Lueger as the most eminent type of German Burgermeister. How many prejudices were thrown over through such a change in my attitude towards the Christian-Socialist Movement!

My ideas about anti-Semitism changed also in the course of time, but that was the change which I found most difficult. It cost me a greater internal conflict with myself, and it was only after a struggle between reason and sentiment that victory began to be decided in favour of the former. Two years later sentiment rallied to the side of reasons and became a faithful guardian and counsellor.

At the time of this bitter struggle, between calm reason and the sentiments in which I had been brought up, the lessons that I learned on the streets of Vienna rendered me invaluable assistance.”

It was then that Adolf began looking elsewhere for answers to the hidden questions that plagued his understanding. He purchased some anti-Semitic pamphlets but upon reading them found too many discrepancies in the literature. As he put it, “The subject appeared so enormous and the accusations were so far-reaching that I was afraid of dealing with it unjustly and so I became again anxious and uncertain.”

This was also the period that Adolf became aware of the Zionist movement which had taken outward form back in 1897 in Basel, Switzerland and was now building strength in Vienna. The more he studied it the more he realized that while amongst the Jews themselves they gave the outward appearance of being in disagreement over the aims of the new organization, beneath all the rhetoric he sensed a concerted effort to remain unified; a deliberate plan that concealed from the general public by the press. In his words, “Thus there was no real rift in their internal solidarity. This fictitious conflict between the Zionists and the Liberal Jews soon disgusted me; for it was false through and through and in direct contradiction to the moral dignity and immaculate character on which that race had always prided itself.”

Once the aperture of truth began opening Adolf’s view of Judaism and Zionism took on greater clarity. As he put it, “In my eyes the charge against Judaism became a grave one the moment I discovered the Jewish activities in the Press, in art, in literature and the theatre. All unctuous protests were now more or less futile. One needed only to look at the posters announcing the hideous productions of the cinema and theatre, and study the names of the authors who were highly lauded there in order to become permanently adamant on Jewish questions.”

Before long, he states: “I began then to investigate carefully the names of all the fabricators of these unclean products in public cultural life. The result of that inquiry was still more disfavourable to the attitude which I had hitherto held in regard to the Jews. Though my feelings might rebel a thousand time, reason now had to draw its own conclusions.

The fact that nine-tenths of all the smutty literature, artistic tripe and theatrical banalities, had to be charged to the account of people who formed scarcely one per cent of the nation – that fact could not be gainsaid. It was there, and had to be admitted. Then I began to examine my favourite ‘World Press’, with that fact before my mind.

The deeper my soundings went the lesser grew my respect for that Press which I formerly admired. Its style became still more repellent and I was forced to reject its ideas as entirely shallow and superficial. To claim that in the presentation of facts and views its attitude was impartial seemed to me to contain more falsehood than truth. The writers were – Jews.

I had now no more hesitation about bringing the Jewish problem to light in all its details. No. Henceforth I was determined to do so. But as I learned to track down the Jew in all the different spheres of cultural and artistic life, and in the various manifestations of this life everywhere, I suddenly came upon him in a position where I had least expected to find him. I now realized that the Jews were the leaders of Social Democracy. In face of that revelation the scales fell from my eyes. My long inner struggle was at an end.”

This aspect of Adolf Hitler’s political awakening to the depth of Jewish pervasiveness of German culture and control of the German print media is one of the most enduring,instructive features to come down through history and now present itself for juxtaposition to those who are presently seeking a realistic understanding of how the current state of the world’s volatile and unpredictable political climate has come about. It provides the reader and researcher with a direct link to the overwhelming power and influence of what today is commonly referred to as the “mainstream press or media”.

In my own case and in the case of countless others who’ve experienced a similar epiphany of understanding, whenever it clicks; whenever it gels; whenever it suddenly comes into focus; whenever that missing piece of the puzzle finally appears in the mind’s eye; that’s when each of us experiences the same “revelation” that Adolf Hitler did back in Vienna and that’s also when there is no turning back, no return to a denial of this fundamental truth.

Adolf’s concluding remarks on the subject of Jewish Marxism and Judaism as found in Chapter Two of Mein Kampf bear careful reading for they are some of the most profoundly prophetic words ever written on the Jewish Question and are as intensely relevant today as they were a century ago. He sums up his experience in Vienna with the following:

“As I critically reviewed the activities of the Jewish people throughout long periods of history I became anxious and asked myself whether for some inscrutable reasons beyond the comprehension of poor mortals such as ourselves, Destiny may not have irrevocably decreed that the final victory must go to this small nation? May it not be that this people which has lived only for the earth has been promised the earth as a recompense? Is our right to struggle for our own self-preservation based on reality, or is it a merely subjective thing? Fate answered the question for me inasmuch as it led me to make a detached and exhaustive inquiry into the Marxist teaching and the activities of the Jewish people in connection with it.

The Jewish doctrine of Marxism repudiates the aristocratic principle of Nature and substitutes for it the eternal privilege of force and energy, numerical mass and its dead weight. Thus it denies the individual worth of the human personality, impugns the teaching that nationhood and race have a primary significance, and by doing this it takes away the very foundations of human existence and human civilization. If the Marxist teaching were to be accepted as the foundation of the life of the universe, it would lead to the disappearance of all order that is conceivable to the human mind. And thus the adoption of such a law would provoke chaos in the structure of the greatest organism that we know, with the result that the inhabitants of this earthly planet would finally disappear.

Should the Jew, with the aid of his Marxist creed, triumph over the people of this world, his Crown will be the funeral wreath of mankind, and this planet will once again follow its orbit through the ether, without any human life on its surface, as it did millions of years ago.

And so I believe today that my conduct is in accordance with the will of the Almighty Creator. In standing guard against the Jew I am defending the handiwork of the Lord.”

Thus we see exemplified, after studying the highlights of Adolf Hitler’s quest to understand the world in which he lived while in Vienna and his connection to the Jews and their eternal handiwork, none other than ourselves and our own personal quest for truth. And therein lies both the magic and the mystery of this amazing man who, once he knew with absolute certainty what the problem was, devoted the remainder of his life to the struggle to show his people how they too could understand their own dilemmas and the dilemma of the German nation itself. And here again one might just as easily state that the fate of Germany also symbolized the fate of every nation when it came to the question of their survival as sovereign, democratic, independent and free countries.

Today the world stands precariously poised on the edge of a dark and frightening abyss; one that without exaggeration threatens all life on the planet and ominously resembles the same political scenario that Adolf Hitler warned his people of back in the midst of the 1920’s when Mein Kampf first appeared in print. The world, unfortunately, didn’t get it then and from 1939 onward to the present day, it still hasn’t got it and all the while that it languished in its artificially induced, mind-controlled, Zionist-created coma, the Jewish Marxist juggernaut continued on in its unrelenting pursuit of power and control over the minds of humanity and the resources of the planet.

Adolf Hitler, for all his genius and determination, wasn’t able to breech the barriers of Zionist imposed ignorance that the Jewish-controlled media machine of his day had placed upon the nations of the Western world. When he came to power in Germany in 1933 his party and his nation represented the only viable alternative to the growing threat of Marxist communist totalitarianism but at the same precise moment in history the strongest nation on earth, the United States of America, had also just voted in a political party that was firmly in the hands of the Marxist Jewish communist cartel and so for all of Germany’s heroic and noble efforts to stop the Zionist communist onslaught coming out of the Soviet Union, their strength of purpose was never fully appreciated or understood by those who, through deception, coercion, bribery and malice, had joined the cult of Marxist communist cruelty and ended up backing the forces of evil over those which would have stemmed the growing tide of terror and war which has since washed over the planet and now appears ready to engulf in full what Hitler reverently referred to as “the handiwork of the Lord.”

And so here is where we finally come to the crux of the whole issue of the Jewish Question and all that it entails in terms of the past century’s analysis plus what is currently going on at an even greater pitch now that global circumstances have reached such critical proportions. What’s plainly evident to observers who have mastered the formerly unresolved equation of the inordinate and lethally dangerous power and influence of the Zionist Jews and their worldwide lobby network is that the problem itself, persistently and adamantly concealed behind the colossal deception known as the “6 Million Jewish Holocaust” and promulgated mercilessly by the Jewish controlled media propaganda machine since the end of World War 2, has now reached proportions that threaten the actual survival of humanity itself and therefore must, beyond all else, command our immediate and undivided attention.

—–

What Are Values? by Odinia

OdiniaHdr700 copy

Screen Shot 2014-01-28 at 5.16.53 PM

Using one’s Gods-given reason, intellect and common sense, embracing one’s own perspective, and working for the good of one’s own people is sanity, not hatred. In fact, in a society where one is not allowed to reason, and even the feeling of certain natural basic emotions is legislated against, as with “hate crimes”, one is no longer a human being, but a slave. A free human being is allowed to think, speak and to experience emotion… to hate, love or be indifferent… as he or she chooses. Emotions are given us for a reason, and sometimes even hatred is appropriate, and necessary for survival.

I do not apologize for telling the truth in regard to history, or anything else. When facts have been hidden, it is often for no good purpose. Any argument that cannot weather open debate is no argument at all. In the case of the historical facts presented here, the truth is especially important. This is information each one of our people desperately needs to know. Truth, to Odinists, is a virtue, not a “crime”. It is one of many good qualities that we value. Here is a brief video about Odinist virtues:

 View Video: About the Noble Virtues

For example, we stand against the recent onslaught of arrests, and the jailing,  under Zionist-made “hate” laws (laws which actually are meant to suppress free speech), of historians for the “crime” of writing verifiable facts in books. We do not agree with Galileo Galilei being forced to recant the Heliocentric Theory, on pain of death, either. These are much the same sort of thing.

Cowards who want to “fit in”, who look after their own advantage first, last and always, and who collaborate with such things as indefinite detention without trial are not our people. Anyone who thinks nothing of arresting authors for writing books is the enemy of all free humankind. If a European person is so far gone, so brainwashed, that he or she no longer has the inclination, or the courage, to face reality, or deal with it, there is nothing I, or anyone else, can do to help.  For those who still do have the blood, spirit and courage of our ancestors, read on…

Screen Shot 2014-01-28 at 5.17.16 PM

The date of this Paper is the September 2nd, 1939. If you look carefully you will see, just above the title of the article, the words “Britain First”..Strangely enough, before I ever saw this newspaper, when I knew only a fraction of the truth, I made a Facebook group called “America First”.

In it, I used to talk about “Israel Firsters”, referring to people who wanted to callously use America, its resources, and the very lives of its people as cannon fodder in order to advance Israel. How little I knew then, about just how serious the problem really is and has been, and how much more I have to learn…

I created this group, America First, after an incident in which several hundred “Americans” attacked me online on Independence Day, and some even gave me death threats. They did this simply because I had said that invading the sovereign Kingdom of Jordan so Israel could expand its borders was not only morally wrong, but not in the interests of the United States of America.

A man I know, or used to know, used this name, “America First” in a video interview and sent me the video afterwards to show me and say thank you. This man is now dead, murdered and demonized by Zionist Jews and their collaborators. He said he feared they would kill him, and he was right.

His name was J.T. Ready and he was an intelligent, motivated man who certainly did not kill himself. He had once worked for the Zionists,  but when he saw what they really were he decided to work against them instead. J.T.Ready changed his dogtags shortly before he was killed to read “Odinist”. Here is the video he sent me.

View Video: J.T. Ready

The last time I spoke to him, J.T. Ready gave me to understand that those of us “domestic terrorists” who spoke out against the unconstitutional, criminal Zionist take-over of our country and media, and who were against such things as placing foreign dual Israeli citizens in our government, for example, had been identified and put on a list, especially those who were considered leaders. If I am ever accused of being a deranged Nazi murder-suicide killer and cannot say anything because I am dead, bear this in mind. 🙂 According to J.T. Ready, I am on the list too.

How very strange that English people wrote those words, “Britain First” in the face of Jewish tyranny, so long ago… but it is not a coincidence. They knew. If only people had seen, and had listened, then I would not have had to write the words “America First” these many years later and we would not be in this predicament. Now not just Germany, Russia, England, Palestine and America have the same problem… but the entire world. If no one listens soon, and if we all do not take strong action in every way we can to reverse what has happened, soon there will be no one left to write.

Screen Shot 2014-01-28 at 5.17.33 PMView Video: The Leadership of the Red Army was overwhelmingly Jewish, not “Russian”

I can walk into my living room right now and pick up a “historical” timeline that says Marx was “German”. This is not the case.

Marx, otherwise known as Moses Moredecai Levy was descended from a long line of rabbis.. Trotsky, real name, Lev David Bronstein, was also Jewish..Lenin (also not his real name) was Jewish too. 75% of the Bolsheviks (regular men not leaders) were Jewish.. The international bankers who funded the rise of Communism in Russia? All Jewish. Stalin’s real name? Iosif Dzhugashvili..Dzhugashvili means Jew-son. He was part Jewish and all three of his wives and mistresses were Jewish.

Then there is Lazar Kaganovitch, a Jew who killed as many as 15 MILLION Europeans, but you have never heard of him I imagine. You have heard of Hitler though, I would guess. Here is a video about perspective.

 View Video: Learning about the “Holocaust”

 The KGB leadership…75 percent Jewish, the gulags? You guessed it, and there is a lot more, including mass murderers such as Genrikh Yagoda. Who *wasn’t* Jewish? The Russian royal family, nobility and farmers who were killed and their land taken. Communist Jews killed tens of millions of Europeans out of racist hate..and no one even knows…

 The Hidden Holocaust

 Of the 90,000 German men who surrendered at Stalingrad alone, only 5,000 ever returned to their homeland. Overall, approx. 3 MILLION German soldiers – who had surrendered – died after the war… 1 million at the hands of the Judeo-Bolsheviks and 1.7 MILLION at the hand of Eisenhower.

Screen Shot 2014-01-28 at 5.17.57 PM

“Huddled close together for warmth, behind the barbed wire was a most awesome sight; nearly 100,000 haggard, apathetic, dirty, gaunt, blank-staring men clad in dirty gray uniforms, and standing ankle deep in mud … water was a major problem, yet only 200 yards away the River Rhine was running bank-full.“
Col.Charles Beasley

Screen Shot 2014-01-28 at 5.18.09 PM

“When they caught me throwing C- Rations over the fence, they threatened me with imprisonment. One Captain told me that he would shoot me if he saw me again tossing food to the Germans … Some of the men were really only boys 13 years of age…Some of the prisoners were old men drafted by Hitler in his last ditch stand … I understand that average weight of the prisoners at Andernach was 90 pounds…I have received threats … Nevertheless, this has liberated me, for I may now be heard when I relate the horrible atrocity I witnessed as a prison guard for one of ‘Ike’s death camps’ along the Rhine.”

Col. James Mason

Screen Shot 2014-01-28 at 5.18.39 PM

“Ike” Eisenhower, who killed 1.7 million German servicemen who had surrendered *after* the war. He directed that “prison enclosures are to provide no shelter or other comforts.” Eisenhower wrote in a letter to his wife “God I hate the Germans” and this was the one thing he said that was true. He is referred to in his school yearbook as “the terrible Swedish Jew”. Funny how there is the word “anti-Semitic”, but we do not even have a word for those who hate Europeans.

So extreme is the media bias that many people have not the barest conception of the truth… One good example is Lazar Kaganovitch, an atheist Jew, who was in charge of an operation that killed as many was 15 million European people, a third of them children, and no one has ever even heard of it. Think about why.

Screen Shot 2014-01-28 at 5.19.06 PM

This picture shows starved Ukrainian children at Holodomor…They were  starved to death for their land. Everyone has heard of Hitler and of the “Jewish” holocaust, just not the real facts about it. When a historian tells these facts, he or she is arrested… 44 so far that I have looked into so far, and there are many more. The reason is that when any rational person looks at it, he or she sees the truth.

Ilya Ehrenberg..the war propagandist and war provocateur who invented the “6 million” number, the bars of soap, the lampshades…all admitted hoaxes…. His words are quoted below .. it is hard to believe that anyone could be filled with such monstrous hate. Our course all of this is in accordance with the Talmud. In fact, he left his memoirs to Israel.

Screen Shot 2014-01-28 at 5.19.16 PM

These words were written in a booklet meant to encourage the Judeo-Bolsheviks to savage European civilians and he was successful…it led to the gang rape, and often torture and murder as well, of 2 million European women and little girls as young as 6.

“Kill! Kill! In the German race there is nothing but evil; not one among the living, not one among the yet unborn but is evil! …Use force and break the racial pride of these German women. Take them as your lawful booty. Kill! As you storm onward, kill, you gallant soldiers of the Red Army.”

Screen Shot 2014-01-28 at 5.19.32 PM

The tiny little girl above on the right has had her pants pulled up for the picture. She was raped to death. Just a small part of one account of what happened to helpless, unarmed women and children at the hands of the Judeo-Bolsheviks… (paraphrased from Berlin Downfall 1945 by ANTONY BEEVOR). I know it is hard to believe, but some of the stories are even worse in their own way…

Half-drunk Red Army… soldiers, armed with rifles and machine guns, made unarmed Germans stand in rows. Other Judeo-Bolsheviks forced women and girls to lie on the ground, tore off their clothes and began raping them. ..U.S. soldiers from their truck looked on at all this with eyes wide open. It seemed that they were simply paralyzed by the spectacle. When two young German girls, stripped naked, shouting all the time rushed to the truck and in desperation began to climb on it the American guards pulled them up. The Judeo-Bolsheviks did not like this. Firing wildly into the air and shouting, they rushed to the American truck. The U.S. soldiers quickly readied their guns, and the truck raced away across the road. When it had disappeared, the Judeo-Bolshevik soldiers attacked the German women again.

A young German woman, a little over thirty, mother of a 12-year-old girl, knelt at the feet of a Judeo-Bolshevik corporal and prayed to God that the soldiers take her, and not the girl. But her prayers went unanswered. Tears streamed down her cheeks as she kept praying. The corporal walked away from the woman, his face contorted into a mocking grin. One of the soldiers hit the woman on the face with his boot. “Damned fascist pig!”, he yelled. The young mother fell on her back. The soldier who had hit her, shot her in the head and killed her.

The Judeo-Bolsheviks seized all the German women who were visible. The little daughter of the murdered woman was dragged behind a tank by the killer of her mother. He was joined by other Judeo-Bolsheviks. For half an hour rang out wild screams and moans. Then, completely naked, the girl, unable to stand on his feet, crept back. However, in the overall picture of the atrocities, the suffering of the girl was not unusual. The helpless German men tried to persuade the guards to allow them to help the girl. Rifle at the ready, the Judeo-Bolshevik allowed a German medic to attend to the girl. An hour later she died, and her last sobs burned the hearts of Hartmann and his soldiers. 8 and 9-year-old girls were being repeatedly raped mercilessly by a brutalized Judeo-Bolshevik military. They showed no other feelings other than hatred and lust…. Those who were dragged away from the truck, nobody saw them again.

2 million women and little girls…Little boys who tried to save their female relatives were shot. Many of the victims, who were almost always gang- raped, died. The victims included little girls as young as 6 and women in their 80’s, and also many catholic nuns were assaulted. There was even an assault in a church. The women were led to believe that they would be safe there and then the doors were locked and organ music played by laughing Judeo-Bolsheviks who then assaulted them.

We have ALL heard the name of Anne Frank…Anne Frank who wrote her memoirs in ball point pen (which had not been invented yet) and who actually died of typhus. Why is she considered more important and more worthy of public consideration than these little girls who really were assaulted and butchered?  It is because she is Jewish and these European children are considered to be “goyim” or “human cattle” by the Jewish religion. This is not ancient history either. The IDF rabbi in Israel recently publicly stated that rape in war with non-Jewish victims and Jewish rapists is acceptable because the wars of Israel are, in his words, “not like the wars of other nations”.  According to him, they are “Mitzvah”, or “holy” wars.

Screen Shot 2014-01-28 at 5.19.52 PM
Victims of the strategically unnecessary bombing attack upon Dresden..a city of unarmed civilian refugees, mostly women and children. More of Ilya Ehrenberg’s words…

“The Germans are not human beings. From now on, the word ‘German’ is the most horrible curse. From now on, the word ‘German’ strikes us to the quick. We have nothing to discuss. We will not get excited. We will kill. If you have not killed at least one German a day, you have wasted that day … If you cannot kill a German with a bullet, then kill him with your bayonet. If your part of the front is quiet and there is no fighting, then kill a German in the meantime … If you have already killed a German, then kill another one – there is nothing more amusing to us than a heap of German corpses. Don’t count the days, don’t count the kilometers. Count only one thing: the number of Germans you have killed. Kill the Germans! …  – Kill the Germans! Kill!”

Screen Shot 2014-01-28 at 5.20.08 PM

The Israeli government is always demanding apologies, such as when the Swedish government allowed free speech by not stopping a courageous reporter from printing the truth about an international Israeli organ stealing ring. One wonders if the Israeli government is sorry for the destruction of hundreds of Palestinian villages, as in the massacre of helpless unarmed villagers at Deir Yassin or for …the torture, starvation, rape and murder of TENS OF MILLIONS of Europeans, also to steal their land?  My answer would be no. You must decide for yourself. This is a computer generated image of the monument Israel is building to commemorate the Red Army, no doubt using US tax dollars. They are celebrating the atrocities committed by the Red Army and doing it on land obtained by committing other atrocities.

Screen Shot 2014-01-28 at 5.20.20 PM

Why are they doing this? Because 75 percent of the regular Judeo-Bolsheviks and every single leader of the Red Army was Jewish. According to the Talmud, none of these things are actually morally wrong. In the Talmud (which takes precedence over the part of the Torah you are probably familiar with) it is permissible to break every one of the ten commandments, and this includes murder, theft and child rape, as long as the victim is not Jewish and the perpetrator is.

Screen Shot 2014-01-28 at 5.20.29 PM

Some words from Ovadia Yosef, the head of Shas’s Council of Torah Sages and a senior Sephardic rabbi.. “The sole purpose of non-Jews is to serve Jews…The Goyim were born only to serve us. Without that, they would have no place in the world – only to serve the People of Israel…The lives of non-Jews in Israel are safeguarded by divinity, to prevent losses to Jews. Death has no dominion over us…… With gentiles, it will be like any person – they need to die, but [God] will give them longevity. Why? Imagine that one’s donkey would die, they’d lose their money. This is his servant… That’s why he gets a long life, to work well for this Jew,” Yosef said.“Why are gentiles needed? They will work, they will plow, they will reap. We will sit like an effendi (masters) and eat. That is why gentiles were created.”

Now does everyone understand his or her purpose in the world?

Screen Shot 2014-01-28 at 5.20.59 PM

Shortly after entering Poland, the Judeo-Bolsheviks rounded up 22,000  unarmed European civilian and military leaders, and intellectuals and took them to camps where they disappeared and were never heard from again. This was not a regular war after all…the idea was to destroy the European race, nobility first. … In one case the Europeans were taken to Katyn Forest where the Judeo-Bolsheviks shot them in the back of the head and threw them in mass graves. Later the graves were filled in and pines planted over them. We know the details because some of the people who did this, who later went to Israel, were interviewed about it.

The Germans discovered the graves  of approx. 4,000 people in Katyn Forest and reported them to the Red Cross. It was investigated and various governments were given reports about the evidence of who the victims were and who the perpetrators were, this was undeniable. There was not even any contention about it. Despite FULL KNOWLEDGE of what had happened, this  cowardly, racist massacre of European nobility was blamed upon the Germans. The Jewish media- all over the world- portrayed it as a “Nazi crime” and Americans were actually encouraged to go to war to “save” Poland from “the Nazis”.

The Poles were thereby subjected to the Judeo-Bolsheviks, who had killed thousands of their people already, again. It was not until the 1980’s that Gorbachev finally officially admitted that the Judeo-Bolsheviks were responsible for this terrible crime.

The Sinking of the “Wilhelm Gustloff”

Screen Shot 2014-01-28 at 5.21.25 PM

Apathy and willful ignorance…in a way, they are much the same thing. There is a willingness in many to see *only* what we are directed to see, to be led, and not consider the source…Sometimes we even lose sight of titanic ships…ships that carried European women and children… people like us.

Here are civilian refugees fleeing torture, slavery and slaughter, but unless things are drastically changed by us, their story will never be told and will lie forever, silently, on the sea floor.   Many do not want to know the truth, or know anything 🙂 , Often this is because they feel they have better things to do, such as arranging their hair or playing a video game.

And yet, I understand how the man in this video feels. Like him, I hear the voices of the dead calling out for justice. How can it be that some of us have become so self- centered and lost that they cannot hear the voices of our own people? They also cry out in warning,  from a society that was so much more true than ours it is hard to contemplate how far we have fallen. Even dead, they are not as far gone as most of us are at this moment. If we do not hear them, we too will soon be gone. Here is a video about the sinking of the refugee Ship, “The Wilhelm Gustloff”

View Video: The Sinking of the “Wilhelm Gustloff”

_____________________________________________________________________________________
A Word about the Holohoax

But what about “the Holocaust”? Ok, if you are not referring to the real holocausts at Dresden, for example, or the Holodomor Holocaust or the current ongoing Palestinian genocide, all Jewish led, let us examine “THE” Holocaust for a moment…remembering that there were not even 6 million Jews in Europe at the time and that, scientifically, it is impossible to gas anyone and not leave Zyklon B traces. There is no record of a planned genocide by the Germans anywhere, even though we had broken their code…not a single  fly-over revealed any such activity. Also there is the little problem that it would have taken until the 1980’s to cremate that many people, even by modern methods. The Jewish “holocaust” is a monstrous lie.

Some videos about the overwhelming  evidence against “the Holocaust”.

Jews who tell the Truth about the Holohoax

Holocaust, Hate Speech &were the Germans really so stupid?

Undeniable Evidence. Expert Testimony of Fred Leuchter

David Irving, a Historian who was arrested for writing provable Truth

The scientific conclusions of a jewish researcher…

Ernst Zundel. Pacifist historian jailed for 7 years for telling verifiable facts

Holocaust Liar

Zionists Jailing Authors for telling the Truth under Zionist made “hate” laws (which are actually anti- Free Speech Laws) in 14 Countries

——–

For further information on the Odinism and the works of Odinia see the following:

http://odinist.org/

http://odinist.org/cultural-destruction-assault-death-extinction-us-preservation-people-national-character/
 
Foxfire Journal:  https://odinia.org/current-issue/
 
Several Facebook Pages, the main one here:  https://www.facebook.com/Odinia.International
 
The broadcasts (Most important):  https://www.youtube.com/user/odinistpodcast/videos

 

The Scriptorium

Screen Shot 2014-01-01 at 4.09.58 PM

True German History

Click HERE to access

Adolf and Icke: The Long Road Back to Historical Reality by Arthur Topham

IckeHdr

“We call them “Nazis” just to piss them off.”

~ Friedrich Hollaender, from the 2003 CBC mini-series, “Hitler – The Rise of Evil” [thanks to Justice4Germans.com]

“Exposing the evil of Nazism. Absolutely.”

~ David Icke, in an email to Radical Press publisher Arthur Topham, Sept. 24, 2013

 

On September 22nd, 2013  I ran an article on RadicalPress.com which I received via email from David Icke. It concerned efforts on the part of Icke and his supporters to start a television station called “The People’s Voice”*. The email was basically a promotional advertisement video designed to increase donations and solicit funding for his project.

Having promoted Icke off and on over the past fifteen years, beginning with my now defunct newspaper The Radical, (circa 1998 – 2002), in which I ran ads for his upcoming tours here in Canada as well as articles plus a front page spread covering his 2002 spring speaking tour that I attending in Vancouver on March 25th of 2002, I was fairly well versed in the materials which David was speaking and writing about.

IckeMarEdiRad copy 2

Screen Shot 2013-09-27 at 2.29.25 PM

But, as the old adage goes, life is for learning and evolving and over the ensuing years I slowly began to realize the depth to which our society and our ‘Canadian’ culture in general had been overshadowed, manipulated and deceived by the Zionist Jew forces who then, as now, control the vast majority of the mainstream media and the publishing houses and who’ve worked in concert with the US dominated movie industry since its inception in order to create a milieu of mind-control that for the most part still goes unrecognized by the average Canadian, especially that segment of our ‘classless’ society known euphemistically as the “intelligentsia”.

When I first began publishing The Radical in June of 1998, even though I had been writing and challenging many of the mores of my time for decades, I was still heavily under the influence of my cultural upbringing where, from the moment of my birth, I had been conditioned, like all Canadians, into believing that there was no greater evil on the face of the earth than Adolf Hitler and the “Nazis”. The endless articles in the newspapers; the slanderous, denigrating and hateful portrayals of the German people and their leader Adolf Hitler in books, movies and on TV, plus the myriad mountains of comic books from my early childhood, had all worked their clandestine, black magic way into my subconscious to the point where the whole background gestalt of what I consciously perceived to be actual history was simply taken for granted unquestioningly even though in most other matters of a political nature I was relatively, as the old Hippie saying went, “hipped to the scene”.

HitlerSnowball 2 copy 3

Typical anti-Hitler war propaganda appearing in Canadian news magazines

As the years passed and I researched more and more into the history of the 20th century, particularly the first half of it, the light slowly began to increase and the truth about what had taken place with respect to the German nation and the rise of Adolf Hitler and the National Socialist party and World War II became more and more glaringly obvious to me.

I was also assisted by Providence in this process of re-awakening to the actualities of Germany and its history through the medium of the “Letters to the Editor” section that I ran in my monthly tabloid. It was there that the first promptings of what would eventually become my long and at times arduous mental journey back to historical reality began when one of my subscribers to the newspaper from out in Ontario started sending letters informing me that some of my articles, which at the time still reflected my ingrained ignorance of Adolf Hitler and the National Socialist party, were not necessarily factual. I can only thank God that they brought the error of my ways to my attention for ever since that time, like a recovering alcoholic, I’ve been forced to recognize daily my addiction to the deception that I had been unconsciously brainwashed into believing. For some time it seemed that my recovery was traveling at a snail’s pace but when another associate and friend of mine sent me Douglas Reed’s classic 1950s work on the origins and nature of political Zionism, The Controversy of Zion, my fate was finally sealed and I experienced an epiphany of political realization that has since steadfastly remained and continues to wax in fullness with each passing day.

It was now clearly obvious to me that the history of the 20th century had been tampered with to such a degree that none of its political and/or historical orthodoxies could be taken for granted any longer included the greatest, most massively pervasive deception of all, that of the true nature of National Socialist Germany and its illustrious and loved leader, Adolf Hitler.

Jewhate2Nazis copy 3

After the physical war ended then came the Greatest Lie of the 20th century

It may have become obvious to me perhaps but not, as it turns out, to David Icke, who in the meanwhile had continued to advance in prestige and notoriety as the Internet and his periodic world tours enhanced his position in the growing alternative truth movement of which Icke had been one of the initial protagonists.

As my efforts increased to inform my readership about the true nature of Adolf Hitler and the National Socialist movement in Germany so did the harassment from the Zionist Jews who perceived my truth telling to be extremely detrimental to their ongoing program of mind control which, up until the advent of the Internet, had been so successful in brainwashing the population on most levels of reality ranging from history and culture to religion and spirituality and much that lay in between those broad-ranging parameters.

By the end of 2007 I was facing my first serious attack by world Jewry in the form of a sec. 13(1) “hate crime” complaint registered against my person and my website radicalpress.com by B’nai Brith International’s Canadian cell known as B’nai Brith Canada. That attack is still ongoing and now exacerbated by a second assault by the same forces, one which occurred in May of 2012 when I was arrested and charged with a second Criminal Code of Canada Sec. 319(2) “hate crime” soon after publishing the article “Israel Must Perish!” , a spoof based upon an actual book originally published back in 1941 called, Germany Must Perish!

GerMustPerCover

Over the past few years of endless litigation and all the accompanying hardships that ensue when a person is forced into a defensive position by a government too heavily influenced by lobby groups such as B’nai Brith Canada, I drifted away from having the time to frequent Icke’s website. Occasionally David would publish an article of mine if it was related to his ongoing legal battles with the complainant who also filed a complaint against me in 2011  but other than that there was little communication between the two of us. At one point a few years ago I had already ran into some minor hassles with David when I inadvertently and innocently ran one of his articles which he sends out to his exclusive list of paying subscribers. His reaction, given the fact that I was only publishing the story in order to bring him more subscribers, was overly heavy and I basically backed off at that point from printing his work. But as time went by the memory of that incident also faded and when I received David’s email informing me of his new initiative in the form of a television station to broadcast to the alternative truth movement I was moved once again to put my shoulder to the common wheel of resistance in an effort to assist others in the battle against the dark forces now wreaking havoc around the world. And so I ran his promo ad for him as a gesture of good will.

Soon afterwards though I began receiving feedback from readers explaining to me why they were not willing to support Icke and his planned television station. They referred to him as someone who was spreading the usual Zionist Jew disinformation about National Socialist Germany and Adolf Hitler and also that his recent willing collusion with Alex Jones was another example of why they couldn’t trust what Icke might do if his television show went on the air.

Following that a friend of mine sent me an email containing a number of poster type graphics that Icke normally runs on his website. Most of them were standard anti-government, anti-corporate style images that we see on Facebook and other social media sites but as I scrolled down the list I came upon one that I found quite disturbing and, by coincidence, also in keeping with the recent emails I had received on this very topic. Here it is:

United

After reading the caption there was little doubt left in my mind as to what Icke’s intent was in running such an image; one containing such a clearly blatant and direct attack upon the German nation and their ability to discern truth.

Disappointed, I said to myself, “that’s not the caption that ought to be on an image such as that” and so I re-did the graphic making it read what should have been there in the first place. And this is how it came out.

United

I then decided to sent the newly, “revised” image to David along with a personal message which is republished here verbatim. It reads:

Dear David,

If you are even to achieve the aims of global peace, love, harmony and understanding you first must overcome your ignorance regarding National Socialist Germany, Adolf Hitler and the German nation as a whole.

Your Germanophobic behaviour is unbecoming of someone who professes to understand the true nature of the Zionist New World Order agenda. All you are achieving by this anti-Hitler, anti-German propaganda is creating greater dissension and confusion amongst the growing number of truth-seekers who are fast coming to the realization that the west erred greatly in declaring war on Germany and in truth should have joined forces with the German nation and put a stop to the Zionist/Communist Bolshevik forces, led by Marxist Jews.

You should rightly be going after the Communists and Marxists and Zionists for they are the unholy trinity that formed by stealth in order to wreak devastation and terror upon the world throughout the 20th century and into the 21st. Why you haven’t realized this a long time ago has always been a great disappointment and a mystery to me.

If this is what you plan to do with the “People’s Voice”, i.e spread greater misinformation and yes, hatred, toward the German people and the ultimate sacrifice they made in their gargantuan effort to stop the Zionist juggernaut then I will not be able to do anything further to assist you in your efforts and will in fact have to resist all that you have thus far accomplished. Please [underlined in the original for emphasis. ed.] try to reconsider your position on Hitler and Germany and realize that it was world Jewry who first declared war upon that great nation because they broke away from the Rothschild cartel and their central banking system. It was the Jews who laid all the devious schemes that created that great conflict and all the other major conflicts since that time.

You have got to connect those dots David or else the full truth will never come out and all that you’ve worked for over the past quarter of a century will have been for naught.

I pray that you will reconsider your position on this vital matter.

Sincerely and in gratitude for all the other good work that you’ve accomplished,

Arthur Topham
Publisher & Editor
The Radical Press
Canada’s Radical News Network
“Digging to the root of the issues since 1998”

Well, it didn’t take long to get a reaction. Less than three hours later I received the following email reply from David Icke. It’s reproduced here in full. The Bold text is mine.

From:     David Icke <…>
Subject:     Re: Personal appeal to you David re: your anti-German disinformation emanating from your website
Date:     24 September, 2013 10:33:22 PM PDT
To:     Radical Press <radical@radicalpress.com>

Why don’t you grow up, Arthur, eh? How old are you?

My God.

It doesn’t matter the scale of effort or risk or abuse that someone takes to make a difference and give people a voice worldwide you won’t support it because your personal belief system is far more important.

Then don’t, don’t. Go on living in your self-obsessed, self-indulgent bubble that is changing nothing.

And a few people can’t control the world? It’s a piece of piss.

Promoting hatred of German people? Bollocks.

Exposing the evil of Nazism. Absolutely.

Evil v Evil = Double Evil.

You call yourself ‘radical’, Arthur? You must be joking.

[no signature]

I read it over a couple of times giving it some thought and then replied to David with the following email:

Dear David,

I’m 66 years old and well aware of how the world works and have for a much longer time than you obviously.

I can’t say that I appreciate your insolent response. It’s so typically Jewish. A non-response soaked in epithets and chutzpah. Oi veh. Rather reminiscent of Jeff Rense and his ilk.

What a sad indictment David.  The “evils of Nazism” you say. Someday you must do a program on all those “evils” and show the world, as the Jews have been doing incessantly since 1933, just what they truly were. Oh, and don’t forget the 6 Million as well. It would be a shame to leave that one out wouldn’t it?

And no, I don’t joke about being a radical. I’ve been at it since 1967. That’s 46 years. You’ve got another 21 to go.

God grant that you come to a fuller understanding of the Jewish Question by that time. For your sake and for the world’s as well.

I see now why you’ve colluded with the likes of Alex Jones.

I guess I won’t have to invest in a telly after all. Pity.

Sincerely,

Arthur Topham
Publisher & Editor
The Radical Press

And so that’s how things now stand with respect to David Icke and the Radical Press. For David, it appears that the shape-shifting reptilian lizards are still at the root of our global problems and that Adolf Hitler and the German nation must have all been taken over by these alien creatures prior to the “Nazis” committing their horrendous horrors against the rest of humanity. As for me I’m willing to place my bet on the fact that it was the dark, evil, Satanic spirit of world Jewry that shape-shifted into the visible form of political Zionism in 1897 who has since been the primary instigator of global war, poverty, debt, environmental destruction and disease throughout the 20th century and right up to the present moment.

As always, time will reveal the truth in due course.

I would like at this point to extend an apology to those readers on my list who I may have insulted by sending them Icke’s article. That wasn’t my intention. In retrospect it appears it was, once again, Providence’s way of giving me a further shake and making me aware of what others within our challenged community of New World Order resisters are doing to hinder that inevitable wide-scale awakening which we are all labouring so hard to accomplish.

—-

* An interesting side note regarding the choice of this name. Here in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada there is a communist newspaper that’s been around for a number of years and its name is…you guessed it…” The People’s Voice”.

Eighty Years of Infamy – Enough Already! by Justice4Germans.com

http://justice4germans.com/2013/09/02/eighty-years-of-infamy-enough-already/

Screen Shot 2013-09-02 at 12.30.22 PM

Screen Shot 2013-09-02 at 12.40.03 PM

by justice4germans

j4g-logo-smallyoutube-logo3

by Arthur Topham (Radical Press)

On Thursday, March 23rd, 1933 the newly democratically elected Chancellor of Germany Adolf Hitler and his cabinet, in a vote taken in the Kroll Opera House in Berlin by the Reichstag on proposed legislation known as the Enabling Act – the “Law for Removing the Distress of People and Reich,” were given a four year mandate to rule Germany, unrestrained by Parliament. The vote, when taken, was: 441 for and 84 against.

On Friday, March 24th, 1933 one day after this historic event, World Jewry openly declared war on Germany!

JudeaDeclaresWarGermany-700

Thus was set the stage upon which Germany and the world at large would be continually forced to bear witness to World Jewry’s endless and psychopathic vengeful obsession with their ongoing campaign of vitriolic lies, racism and HATRED toward the German people and the German nation.

2013 marks the 80th anniversary of this planned strategy of intentional conditioning of generation upon generation of western civilization’s citizens to fear, loathe and despise first and foremost the National Socialist Party of Germany (termed “NAZI” by the Jew media), its leader Adolf Hitler and then, by extrapolation, the German people as a whole.

After eight decades of defamation and endless slurring it begs the question as to why World Jewry would continue to, as the saying goes, flog a dead horse over and over and over again? To what (or whose) advantage is is to constantly harken back nearly a century in order to reinforce what is now, thanks to the tireless efforts of historical revisionists, evidently the most profoundly provocative and colossal LIE ever foisted upon the world?

A day never passes when the so-called “mainstream media (MSM)  doesn’t make mention of either Adolf Hitler or the “Nazis”,  or the purported “Jewish Holocaust”.  Relentless and hard-hearted as the tax man or the bill collector the Jew-controlled MSM, like the ancient Mariner in Coleridge’s famed poem, holds the general pubic’s attention hostage with its “glittering (TV) eye” while spinning out its slanderous tales of endless misery and woe and persecution, all of which is maliciously and willfully designed to shore up a deceit that is now unraveling before the world, thanks to the miracle of the Internet!

Only those born before 1933 could honestly say that they lived in a period of history when libel of Germany wasn’t an all-pervasive reality and the numbers of people living today who are of that age and still conscious of their former world are few and far between.

Those of us born after World Jewry’s 1933 declaration have all been subjected to the unceasing assault on the German nation that still persists today [and have even participated in it].

It was writers like Theodore N. Kaufmann, quoted above, who spear-headed the intentional promotion of HATRED toward Germany prior to America’s involvement in a war that Hitler and the German nation never wanted and never were guilty of causing. Kaufmann and world Jewry’s aim was to change the attitude of the American people; one that was then either neutral or pro-German rather than anti and twist the truth about Hitler and the National Socialist government and their amazing accomplishments from 1933 until 1939.

And so his hate-filled screed titled German Must Perish! was promoted by the most prestigious MSM publications in the USA when it appeared in 1941 prior to America’s entry into the conflict. Magazines like Time and newspapers like the New York Times and the Washington Post lauded the idea of absolutely destroying the German nation and the German race as a whole referring to the grotesquely contemptible concept as a “SENSATIONAL IDEA!”

GermanyPerishFBCovers-copy-3

“This dynamic volume [Germany Must Perish!] outlines a comprehensive plan for the extinction of the German nation and the total eradication from the earth, of all her people.”

“It is a definite obligation which the world owes to those who struggled and died against the German yesterday, and to those who are fighting him again today, as it is the bounden duty of the present generation to those yet unborn, to make certain that the vicious fangs of the German serpent shall never strike again. And since the venom of those fangs derives its fatal poison not from within the body, but from the war-soul of the German, nothing else would assure humanity safety and security but that that war-soul be forever expunged, and the diseased carcass which harbors it forever removed from this world. There is no longer any alternative: Germany Must Perish!”
~ Theodore N. Kaufman, Germany Must Perish!, Argyle Press, Newark, New Jersey, 1941

Once World Jewry was successful in dragging the USA into the war via their choreographed “Pearl Harbour” maneuver all stops were pulled out and the vicious denigration of Hitler and Germany began in earnest never to abate even to this day.

Canadian children growing up during the war years were subjected to all the anti-German hatred propaganda that was carried in the media. Images of Hitler and the “Nazis” were ever-present and for all the German-Canadian citizens throughout the nation the devastating effect of such vile and systematic psychic abuse worked its way into the minds and subconscious of those who, prior to World Jewry’s intentions, had been respected members of Canadian society.

Continue reading here http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=2595

COMMENT by Justice4Germans:

I am most grateful to Arthur Topham of the Radical Press for this piece, and for all of his hard work and dedication to these issues over many years, and at great risk to himself. Indeed it has put him into legal jeopardy here in Canada, because his opinions and the material he presents is not “politically correct”.  Freedom of  expression is a God given right and our most basic human right which “in a free and democratic society” as Canada purports to be, should never be subject to laws, prosecution and penalties, no matter who claims to be offended.   However, and what is worse, is when a select group is entitled to spew outright lies while being selectively protected from every criticism, much less from prosecution.

If Canadians honestly believed that they, or their soldiers,  were fighting in two world wars to protect such rights (as sold) then why, pray tell,  are such rights and freedoms subject to arbitrary limitations and punishment and selectively enforced.  It is shear hypocrisy and an affront to those who laid down their lives for such principles, even if they were misled about the reasons for the war in the first place. They too were victims of the BIG LIE.

To Arthur’s comments, that “the … images of Hitler and the ‘Nazis’ were ever-present and for all the German-Canadian citizens throughout the nation  … AFTER THE WAR too, and  …the devastating effect of such vile and systematic psychic abuse worked its way into the minds and subconscious of all those … forced to absorb this false history, causing continued widespread anti-Germanism!” I will add that I grew up in Canada and I experienced it many times in my childhood, right through into my adult life, and all based upon lies and absurdities!

voltaire-quotes-atrocities-and-absurdities1

It is high time that Canadians, and all others, learned the real, full, true history of World War I and II and realized how they have been blatantly lied to for nearly a full century, dating back to 1914, and understood that your soldiers were sent off to fight and die unnecessarily, and to commit unspeakable atrocities against the German people for the benefit of the International Bankster Gangsters, who in 1933 called themselves “World Jewry”.

With the help of a bunch of lying gangster friends who run the media in this country, and virtually everywhere else, and who also call themselves “Jews” (and are not)  they formed an international criminal cabal with a conspiracy to get good people, of all races, to fight their wars for their financial benefit, and for their sick New World Order agenda.  Only they benefited from both world wars, while crying victimhood, and it continues to this day, with new victims, namely:  any country which seeks independence from them and to do right by it’s people!  And the same method of operations, with the same lies, fear atrocity propaganda to manipulate the masses is employed, and time and  time again, believed.

Thus I say, a full century of treachery, lies and deceit, and of genocide and crimes against humanity … enough already!  WAKE UP WORLD!

And with that, I proudly declare …

assad

••• 88 •••