Tom Mysiewicz reviews “The Essential Saker” for the ShamirReaders mailing list

SAKERHDR

http://thesaker.is/tom-mysiewicz-reviews-the-essential-saker-for-the-shamirreaders-mailing-list/

Tom Mysiewicz reviews “The Essential Saker” for the ShamirReaders mailing list
2576 ViewsFebruary 09, 2016 11 Comments
Book Review
Book Title: The Essential Saker
Copyright 2015 ISBN-13: 978-1-60888-058-4
Author: The Saker
Publisher: Nimble Books LLC, Ann Arbor, MI, USA 48103
Web Page: http://www.NimbleBooks.com
E-mail: wfz@nimblebooks.com
Reviewer: Tom Mysiewicz
Yahoo groups link: https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/shamireaders/conversations/messages/4018

Unlike a woman who will not let you see her “without her face on,” The Essential Saker lets you see the Saker’s successful and unsuccessful analysis over time. It freely admits he’s changed his views on some things. He speaks in possibilities/probabilities. But even when wrong, these often demonstrate that he reached the same conclusions as those in power (the various tentacles of the leviathan he terms “AngloZionist”) who changed the game with clever countermeasures, 911-type false flags and information warfare.

One example that jumps to mind is Saker’s exploration of the curious union of left-right French philosopher Soral and Afro-French comedian Dieudonne. (Such a union is equivalent to the feared union of the “far right” and the “far left” in the U.S., which keeps the ADL, SPLC and “Neocons” awake at night.) He notes the persecution of the comedian was making him more rather than less popular and, in conjunction with France’s collapsing economy, more heavy-handed government tactics could lead to a popular uprising. Alas, Dieudonne was recently expelled from Hong Kong at the behest of the French and Israeli consulates and has been heavily suppressed and slapped with numerous legal sanctions. Using the excuse of a claimed ISIS attack in Paris and crumbling economy, French leader Hollande essentially declared martial law, obviating any such uprising.

However, most valuable and alone justifying reading this book is Saker’s “spot on” philosophical and religious analysis of Russia, Russian politics, Russian history, the Russian people and Russia’s relations with other peoples and religions (especially Islam.)

Saker deals with some of the “macro” events in recent Russia history straightforwardly, pointing out that the Russia of today has little in common with Imperial Russia or with the USSR. Putin’s Russia and his policy of “sovereignization” is a break with the Orwellian doublespeak of the West, in which “freedom” is really slavery. (Putin apparently learned this lesson during the looting of his country in the 1990s.)

In fact, Putin’s embrace of a policy of realism and truthfulness, as described in this book, stands out in stark contrast to the obvious lies put forward by what he terms his “foreign partners.” For instance, Russia is goaded to invade Ukraine after a “partner’s” proxy color revolution and, when it does not do so, is accused of invading and is sanctioned as if it had done so. Or Russia conducts a perfectly legal intervention in Syria to counter an illegal proxy war against the legitimate government. It is accused of “harming the prospects of peace.” (This performance brings to mind a 1999 Canadian movie “eXistenZ”[1]. In this VR (virtual-reality) movie, “realist” forces battle the forces of “distorted reality.” At the end, real people have died and some gamers do not know if they are still in VR or not!)

Certainly, Saker’s book views the Bolshevik revolution as a similar distortion of Russia’s organic history (and perhaps a reason for Putin’s realism): it was alien, non-Russian and the infamous “Trotsky” (Lev Bronstein) was a mass murderer of Russians. In addition to creating major problems for Russia because of the Trotskyite Communist-expansionist doctrine (which led to a stinging defeat by Poland in 1919-1921 and helped Hitler to rise to power) Saker points out that the choice of a federalized system of republics to form the USSR directly led to the fragmentation into separate countries of hitherto organic parts of Russia in the 1990s. We in the West call this “the breakup of the Soviet Union.”

Stalin’s counter-revolution against the “Trots,” Saker’s book asserts, pivoted on the nationalistic sentiments of ethnic Russians, even though he was a Georgian who could not pronounce Russian words properly. The jailing and execution of numerous “Trots” led to charges of Stalinist anti-Jewish pogroms. These charges go on even today–I was just reading in the Forward a critique of Presidential-candidate Bernie Sanders for working on a “Stalinist” Israeli kibbutz[2].

According to Saker, many Jews were in leadership positions in the Trotskyite faction, hence their liquidation. Jews willing to work with Stalin were unharmed. (I concur: Jews such as Frenkel, Solts, Berman and Yagoda designed and even ran the infamous gulag system for Stalin. And Jewish propagandists such as Ehrenberg helped create much of the Soviet wartime propaganda in WWII. Stalin even created an autonomous homeland—Birobidzhan–for Jews in the USSR[3].)

As no good deed goes unpunished, Saker suggests that (after the Stalinist killing of Trotsky in Mexico) renegade Trots infected the American political system with the doctrines we today associate with the Neoconservative movement—especially techniques of subversion (color revolutions) and almost-messianic expansionism (“export of democracy” equivalent to the “spread of Communism” or “the inevitability of Communism.”) And these red, white and blue Trotskyites have preserved their animus toward Stalin as today’s hostility toward Russia and anything Russian. If Russia is weak, as during Yeltzin’s reign, they are happy. If Russia is strong, as under Putin, “something must be done about it!”

As we are head toward a possible world war over Russia’s apparent strengthening, Saker seems to be saying, it could be related to the Neocon forces feeding off their own and popular misconceptions about Russia and Russians:

*That Russia seeks to reconstitute the former Soviet “empire”;

*That Russia is a majority nation of icon-worshipers packing Russian Orthodox churches every week;

*That Russia never has and would never join with non-Christians to overcome even a (nominally) Christian foe;

*That most historical Russian rulers in the past 350 years protected the Orthodox church;

*That Muslims are not accepted by Russians or are persecuted for being Muslim; and,

*That there were pogroms in Russia proper or that Jews were persecuted for religion by a “Russian” named Stalin and by subsequent Soviet rulers.

Failure to properly understand Russia, Saker intimates, has also seemingly led the U.S. to invest a great deal of effort and money to create a Russian fifth column of NGOs and “liberals” hoping these will destabilize Russia and topple Putin. Will it work? Will we see a “color revolution” in Russia? Saker sees this drive as futile and part of a general strategy to create chaos around the world in order for the AngloZionists to retain power. At best, he says, after the plunder of Russia by oligarchs and financiers under Yeltzin, only 1-2% of Russians support liberals whom they view as “a small degenerate group of U.S. worshipers, intellectuals who hate Russia.”

By way of illustration, Saker relates a Russian joke about a teacher who asks a student what he’d be if his grandparents, relatives and parents were Stalinists. The child answers: “A Stalinist.” Then the teacher asks what he’d be if his relatives were unsavory things, his mother was a prostitute and his father a drug addict and criminal. To which the kid answers: “A liberal!”

According to Saker there is only one significant Russian party (as all the pro-U.S. parties could not secure even one seat in the Duma) the United Russia Party of Putin and Medvedev. Secondarily, he notes, Putin’s “All Russia People’s Front” could become a significant party in the event of a power struggle he predicts between Putin (representing the Eurasian Sovereignist faction) and Medvedev (representing the pro-U.S. Atlantic Integrationist faction.)

Does this then mean that Putin is an all-powerful dictator and that the Russian government is a monolithic force? The Essential Saker will disillusion you in this regard.

Putin, says Saker, came to power as a non-threatening apparatchik successor to Yeltzin acceptable to the post-Communist Western occupiers. By the time they realized their mistake, Putin had dug himself in, eventually adopting Medvedev to placate them. Putin expelled some of the Jewish oligarchs and expropriated and jailed some. Others saw the handwriting on the wall and were allowed to keep their gains in return for going along with Putin’s concept of Russian sovereignty, i.e., acting independently of the AngloZionist financiers in London and the muscle of Washington.

While Putin averted a complete disintegration of Russia (of the type now taking place in Greece) Saker points out that he’s acting under a considerable handicap that explains seeming half-hearted behavior at times: “The people were changed, the system remained fundamentally the same,” states The Essential Saker.

What about Russian Orthodoxy—surely that is a massive and monolithic force in Russia that trumps just about everything? Not exactly. Says Saker: of the 40% of Russians who consider themselves “Orthodox” only a small percentage could be considered religious. Part of this dates back to the Communist era, when the official Orthodox Church adopted the heretical practice of “collaborating with evil in order to accomplish good.” (In his Gulag Archipelago, Alexander Solzhenitsyn related the story of an Orthodox cleric visiting a prisoner in a cell, looking nervous and—instead of being strengthened by his faith—scurried away out of fear he too might be locked up.)

Saker also explains that there are really 4 different Orthodox churches, only one of which is “official.” Separate, yes, but they recognize one another. Orthodoxy for many Russians represents patriotism, history and organic Russian culture, he concludes, rather than fanatical religious belief.

As historical background, Saker’s book examines the gulf existing between Orthodoxy and the “Western church” (Roman Catholicism)—noting that the refusal of Orthodoxy to accept the Pope as supreme ruler and “vicar of Christ on Earth” is and has been a major factor in geopolitical events. And it turns out to be a very timely subject! Possibly to head off a world war in the wake of an impending Syro-Russian victory, a historic meeting is now to take place in Cuba between Catholic Pope Francis and Orthodox Patriarch Kirill I.

I must say that, being raised as a Catholic, I had never heard of what Saker describes as an often violent Papal reaction to Russia’s refusal to bow to Rome–what a Catholic theologian terms “Russian narcissist self satisfaction.”[4] In addition to dealing with the various proxies of Rome through history, Saker recounts how much of the Russian nobility was of German extraction, heavily Freemasonic, and like the Jesuits, always trying to “turn Russia into Poland.”

As for the historic, once-in-a-millenium meeting between Pope and Patriarch: will Kirill be directly representing the Kremlin in this matter? Saker points out that there is much suspicion going back to the Bolshevik Era, when the Moscow Patriarchy or official Orthodox Church was considered a puppet of the state by believers: “…there is some pretty good evidence that Kirill I might be a secret papist cardinal, something called a “cardinal in pectore” which, if true, is probably used against him by the Russian security services to make sure that he does whatever the Kremlin says.”

What about Russian-Islamic relations—both in Russia and in the Mid East, where Russia is now militarily involved? Saker observes that “…the Wahhabi and ‘al Qaeda’ types are the foot soldiers of…(a) new U.S. imperial policy.” Yet he also observes that, while some in the Russian government are suspicious of Muslims, major players such as the security services and even the foreign policy organs see them as potential allies in creating a stable multipolar world order.

Due to internal power struggles in Washington between “old guard” forces and the Neocon/Zionist “boots on the ground” imperialists, he apparently sees current limits to such alliances because some Islamic sects are being manipulated to cause chaos as a proxy weapon of imperial control—and not only in the Mid East.

Saker sees the Bolshevik persecution of religion (another destructive legacy of Trotsky) as one cause of perceived animosity toward Islam. However, he explains that, prior to the revolution, Muslims were an accepted part of Russia and freely allowed to practice their religion. According to the Saker, Russia was and is multinational and, today, all the various peoples in the Federation are considered “Rossiianin” and the ethnic-Russians (Russki) are just one part of this mix. While relatively few ethnic Russians are Muslims, many Rossiianin have played a role in Russian history, including: “…the (mostly Muslim) Mongols who helped Saint Alexander Nevsky defeat the Teutonic Knights of the Papist Northern Crusaders, to the two Chechen special forces battalions who spearheaded the Russian counter-offensive against the Georgian Army in the 08.08.08 war…”Rossiiskii Islam” is an phenomenon present throughout the 1000+ years of Russian history and an integral part of Russia’s identity.”

Of course, to whatever extent it exists, most of the (unnecessary) conflict with Islam dates back to the Afghan intervention by the USSR on behalf of the Kabul government, when U.S. and Saudi funded and armed Wahhabist “mujaheddin” savaged Soviet troops. After the withdrawal and the collapse of the USSR, these Wahhabis waged a proxy war for the U.S./AngloZionists against Russia in Chechnya.

In closing, Saker’s hopes are that Muslims will rise to defeat the Daesh extremist proxies and that inclusive organizations like Hezbollah and Shiite clerics like Imran Hosein may lead the way to better Russian-Islamic cooperation.

*****

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existenz ?
http://forward.com/news/333020/bernie-sanders-stint-at-stalinist-kibbutz-draws-red-baiting-from-right/ ?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Birobidzhan ?
http://abyssum.org/2014/01/08/francis-and-bartholomew-vs-kirill-only-christ-can-overcome-russian-narcissist-self-satisfaction/ ?

Screen Shot 2016-02-14 at 10.28.29 PMScreen Shot 2016-02-14 at 10.29.06 PM

The Essential Saker: from the trenches of the emerging multipolar world
$27.95

The Revisionists’ Total Victory on the Historical and Scientific Level By Robert Faurisson

TotalVictory copy

The Revisionists’ Total Victory on the Historical 

and Scientific Level

By Robert Faurisson

R.Faurisson

December 31, 2015

“The rising flood, particularly on the Internet, that is bringing to the world’s knowledge the spectacular achievements of historical revisionism is not suddenly going to halt its advance or return towards its source.”

~ Robert Faurisson

In France and in the rest of the world historians and specialists of “the Holocaust” no longer know what to answer to the revisionists’ arguments. And to speak only of my own case, which has been going on since 1978 (that is, for some thirty-seven years), never has my country’s justice system, despite the tireless requests by self-righteous associations to rule against me on the substance of my writings or statements, been able to note therein the least trace of any rashness, negligence, deliberate ignorance, falsehood, falsification or lying. My adversaries, rich and powerful though they may be, have never succeeded in getting our judges to convict me on the merits of the conclusions reached through my research work which, for over half a century, has focused on what is commonly called “the genocide of the Jews”, “the Nazi gas chambers” and “the six million (or nearly)” Jewish victims of the Third Reich. At most, at the end countless cases I have lost suits (whether as plaintiff or defendant) or been found guilty mainly 1) for a malevolence, supposed but not demonstrated, towards the Jews, 2) for breaking the gayssotine (the Fabius-Gayssot or Faurisson Act, legislation of convenience specifically targeting the findings of my research) or 3) by virtue of the “good faith” (sic) of individuals like Léon Poliakov or Robert Badinter, even though found to be at fault by the judges themselves.

For years Poliakov had well and truly manipulated the writings of SS officer Kurt Gerstein (who, having “repented” (?), then committed suicide (?)), when not fabricating outright fragments of text to attribute to him. But the judges granted the presumption of good faith to Poliakov. He had been, we were told, “animated by the passionate and legitimate desire to inform the public about a period and about facts of contemporary history that were particularly tragic”. It was therefore appropriate to forgive him for having “perhaps, on minor points [sic!!!], broken scientific standards of rigour without, however, it being permissible to state that he is a manipulator or fabricator of texts”. As for Badinter, in 2006 he claimed that in 1981, when he was still barrister for the LICRA and just before becoming Minister of Justice, he had got a court to rule against me “for being a falsifier of history”. A decision of 2007 restored the truth and held that Badinter had “failed in his evidence” to demonstrate my alleged dishonesty; but, the court hastened to add, he had been in good faith. For want of both money and a lawyer (Eric Delcroix having retired – not without being refused honorary membership of the bar), I did not appeal and was forced to pay the Socialist millionaire the sum of €5,000. But at least since then I have had the satisfaction of being able to speak of “Robert Badinter, my liar, my slanderer… in good faith”.

An astute observer will have noted that the more our opponents sense the game is getting away from them on the historical or scientific level, the more they feel the need to increase their propagandistic drum beating, and the repression as well. In France, at this very moment, they are putting all their hopes in having Parliament pass a supergayssotine. Good for them! A few weeks short of my 87th birthday, I have six cases pending, four against me and two others that I have had to instigate, albeit quite unwillingly. Will my judges finally decide, in 2016, to leave us, my wife and me, destitute? Or are they getting ready simply to throw me into a prison of the République? It is understood beforehand, is it not?, that if they were to carry things to such extremes it would only be on the grounds of the noblest républicain principles and in the name of human rights.

Let’s consider our current Prime Minister. One day, Manuel Valls, in full pomposity, his mouth, heart and left hand clenched, let fly: “I am, by my wife, eternally linked to the Jewish community and Israel”. He saw himself as “eternal”: a vast programme! But fervour was leading him astray. He ought to come back down to earth, reconnect with the ground, get treatment and stop deluding himself: the revisionists have, already as of now, won the match.

As early as in 1983-1985, Raul Hilberg, surrendering to the arguments of “Faurisson and others…” had to drop the pretension of explaining, on the basis of valid arguments and documents of his own, that the Third Reich had, with proper Germanic efficiency, designed, prepared, developed, organised and financed the killing of millions of European Jews. The eminent Jewish American historian ended up finding himself reduced to trying to have us believe that this gigantic massacre had come about by the operation of the Holy Spirit or, in his words, by “an incredible meeting of minds, a consensus-mind reading within a large bureaucracy” that had, on its own, spontaneously decided, it seemed, gradually to abandon written communication in favour of verbal or indeed telepathic exchange to such an extent that no written or material evidence bespoke the six million Jews’ (or, in Hilberg’s case, a bit fewer) had been systematically killed either on the Eastern Front or in the gas chambers, mainly at Auschwitz.

Screen Shot 2016-01-14 at 11.16.23 AM

A number of historians or researchers, such as Arno Mayer, Jean-Claude Pressac and Robert Jan van Pelt, have also capitulated, in a more frank and direct manner. The first has had to admit, among other bitter observations, that “Sources for the study of the gas chambers are at once rare and unreliable”. The second, a protégé of the Klarsfeld couple, came to understand that the dossier of the official story of the Jews’ extermination, “rotten” with too many lies, was bound for “the rubbish bins of history”. The third has concluded that “Ninety-nine per cent of what we know [about Auschwitz] we do not actually have the physical evidence to prove”; despite this, millions of visitors there have been and continue to be shown a “gas chamber” said to be in its “original state”, as well as ruins of other alleged “gas chambers”. As for the figure of “six million”, never subjected to the least scientific verification, it is rooted in the most sordid of realities: an old American publicity slogan used already before 1900 and up to the end of the Second World War to collect a windfall of cash especially from the Jewish community. The searing words amounted to the cry “Six million of our brothers are dying in Europe [by the acts, according to circumstance, of Poland, the Balkan countries, Tsarist Russia, National-Socialist Germany…]; we await your money for the victims of this holocaust [sic already in 1919]!”

Manuel Valls, our Prime Minister, and François Hollande, President of our Republic, devote themselves to launching, in several foreign countries, warlike crusades of the kind that have backfired horribly for us French this year. To proceed as they do, contrary to the Constitution, they dispense with the approval of Parliament, either in advance or within forty days from the start of operations. On top of their foreign wars, conducted in the most cowardly as well as the most comfortable conditions, they instil an atmosphere of internecine war at home. They call “cowards” certain enemies who, after all, are inspired on a grand scale by the practices of our glorious Résistants: “Hey, killers with the bullet and the knife, kill quickly!” If François Hollande has the stature of a pedalo admiral, Mr Valls resembles Picrochole, that character in Rabelais whose Greek name means “bitter bile” and who regularly gets all excited at the prospect of going off to war. Mr Valls began with a crusade against the Saracens of today and against the real or supposed enemies of Israel but he is also on a campaign against the revisionists, against “Dieudonné in peace”, against Marine Le Pen – even though she has pushed her own father down the stairs – and even against his friends of the Socialist clan. A good suggestion for him would be to calm down, take care of himself, try to laugh with Dieudonné, reflect for a moment with the revisionists, allow historians or researchers to work as they wish and, at long last, spare us the flag-waving frenzy, the bugle-blowing, the verse and chorus of the Marseillaise on the “day of glory”, the “impure blood” and the “ferocious soldiers”. As we know, it is, unhappily, all too easy to take the French in with that sort of thing.

Such, today, are the modest New Year wishes for 2016 that I allow myself to make for that person, for his victims, for the French and for the rest of the world. But is it perhaps already asking too much?

For their part, the revisionists know what awaits them: the confirmation in the mainstream media, sooner or later, that they have already won a total victory on the historical and scientific level. The political and media powers will indeed have to resign themselves to the facts: persistence in gunboat policies abroad and in those of gagging and censorship at home will only dishonour them a bit more. For nothing.

The rising flood, particularly on the Internet, that is bringing to the world’s knowledge the spectacular achievements of historical revisionism is not suddenly going to halt its advance or return towards its source.

The lies of “the Holocaust” are modelled on those of the First World War. All those “Nazi death-works”, like the ones at Auschwitz, are but a reprise of the myth of German “corpse factories” of 1914-1918. They were merely modernised by the adding of gas (Jewish-American version of November 1944) and sometimes of electricity (Jewish-Soviet version of February 1945). The good people, already generally not well disposed towards the practice of cremating the dead, were led to believe that Germany, a nation considered modern and known for having an abundance of engineers and chemists, had built structures containing, in addition to a cremation space, others called “gas chambers” (in reality, the “depositories”, Leichenhalle or Leichenkeller, technically designed to hold bodies awaiting cremation). Thus a certain propaganda has managed to persuade us that those Germans devils were dumb enough to house under the same roof, on one side, spaces full of a highly inflammable and explosive gas (the hydrocyanic acid or hydrogen cyanide contained in the pesticide Zyklon B, created in the 1920s) and, on the other side, crematory ovens that had to be laboriously brought to a temperature of 900° C.

Germar Rudolf

In 1943 some of the men in charge of British war propaganda deplored “this gas chambers story”. For his part, the revisionist Germar Rudolf sums up the subject rather well in his Lectures on the Holocaust (Chicago, Theses & Dissertations Press, 2005, 566 p., p. 82-85). Even Victor Cavendish-Bentinck, a senior official of the Intelligence Service in London ready to believe just about any nonsense said against the Germans, was to write: “I feel certain that we are making a mistake in publicly giving credence to this gas chambers story” (p. 83). The trouble was that the British, undisputed champions of lying propaganda during the two world wars, needed those fables. On February 29, 1944 their Ministry of Information sent the BBC and the Church of England a circular letter of the greatest cynicism, requesting their respective cooperation for the spreading of propaganda on the basis of atrocity stories either already in circulation or currently being concocted. It was a matter of forestalling the disastrous effect that the Red Army, an ally, was inevitably to bring about in Central Europe by real atrocities (p. 84)! On these inventions, these fabrications and the wide-scale dissemination of enormous tall tales, two books remain of great interest: Edward J. Rozek’s Allied Wartime Diplomacy: A Pattern in Poland, New York, Wiley, 1958 and, especially, by Walter Laqueur (a Jew born in Breslau in 1921): The Terrible Secret, London, Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1980, 262 p., wherein we see Cavendish-Bentinck, him again, “Chairman of the British Intelligence Committee”, writing in July 1943 that “The Poles and, to a far greater extent the Jews, tend to exaggerate German atrocities in order to stoke us up” (p. 83).

Fifteen months ago, referring to the crisis that the historians of “the Holocaust” were experiencing, I wrote that there was “more and more water in their gas, and slack in their knotted rope”. Since January 2015 and the anniversary of the “liberation” of Auschwitz I have noted a sudden acceleration of the phenomenon. I have a whole file and a whole demonstration on the subject but the continuing judicial repression has not yet left me time to publish this information. In any case, for the historian, it has become captivating to observe the never-ending agony of the “magical gas chamber” (Céline in 1950). This agony is accompanied, as we have seen, by a redoubling of the repression of revisionism and a turning up of the volume of holocaustic propaganda. May our Picrochole refrain, then, from going on the stage and into a trance! He would have a stroke. He might even be cruelly snatched away from us. Who knows? He could precede in death a man who will be 87 years of age on January 25, 2016 and whom some have, thus far in vain, so often sought to kill, not for his ideas (he has hardly any) but for having wanted to publish the result of his research, which is summed up in a phrase of about sixty words. I repeat it here for memory, and to have done with it:

The alleged Hitlerite gas chambers and the alleged genocide of the Jews form one and the same historical lie, which has permitted a gigantic political and financial swindle whose main beneficiaries are the state of Israel and international Zionism and whose main victims are the German people – but not their leaders – and the Palestinian people in their entirety.

Note: For sources or references especially regarding certain points of this text one may consult the indices of the seven volumes of my Ecrits révisionnistes thus far published. On the Internet, for “The Victories of Revisionism” (11 December 2006), see robertfaurisson.blogspot.com/2006/12/victories-of-revisionism.html and for “The Victories of Revisionism (continued)” (September 11, 2011), see robertfaurisson.blogspot.it/2011/09/victories-of-revisionism-continued.html.

Aficionados of court rulings by imbeciles are invited to refer to pages 152-155 of the first volume, where there are some titbits from a decision handed down in 1979 by Dame Baluze-Frachet, judge of a Lyon police court. The good lady decreed back then that simply asking the question of the existence of the gas chambers was an affront not only to “good morals” but also to “the moral order”. The amusing bit of it is that by invoking “the moral order” she was advocating – although probably unawares – a value dear to count MacMahon, Marshal of France, President of the French Republic and perennial model of reactionary conservatism. “The moral order” was to return seventy years later on with… Marshal Pétain. As for the aficionados of behavioural curiosities, there is fare for them in the following two videos featuring the current head of the French government: “The left hand of Manuel Valls” and “Rally of March 19, 2014 – speech by Manuel Valls, Minister of the Interior”.

In preparation: 1) an article about an embarrassing secret of Serge Klarsfeld; 2) a study of the highly inflammable and explosive nature of hydrogen cyanide.

—-

French comedian Dieudonne to receive international free speech award – Gilad Atzmon

French comedian to receive international free speech award
June 06, 2015 / Gilad Atzmon

DiedonneAward

www.stylofrance.com

STYLO France, an International literary and human rights group announced today that it will award its 2015 Free Speech prize to controversial French comedian Dieudonné M’bala M’bala in recognition of his exercise of free speech in defiance of repressive laws forbidding it.

“Dieudonné lives in a society where almost unlimited offensive language and artistic expression may be used against some religious and ethnic groups but not others,” said STYLO France spokesperson Paul Larudee at the group’s headquarters in Berkeley, California. “In spite of the consequences, Dieudonné has criticized and ridiculed persons and subjects that are protected from free speech rights under French law. And he has paid dearly for his defiance of these prohibitions.”

Dieudonné has been arrested eight times for anti-Semitism – a criminal offense in France – and has been fined a total of €39,500 ($44,240). His crimes have included comparison of Israeli and Nazi military practices, criticism of the Zionist and Jewish lobbies in France, and inviting convicted “holocaust deniers” on his shows. (It is a crime in France to question or produce evidence contrary to the historical accuracy of standard holocaust accounts.)

Asked whether the STYLO France award is a reaction to the 5 May, 2015 PEN America award to the French satirical publication Charlie Hebdo, Mr. Larudee responded, “Most definitely. Charlie Hebdo never risked breaking French law for the sake of free speech, which is why they avoided criticism of protected groups in France. They paid a high price for insulting Islam but it was totally unexpected, since this is tolerated by the government, so it is hard to say that they showed courage in the face of repression. We think that the STYLO France award to Dieudonné corrects this omission and and also the omission in France of satirical treatment and criticism of protected subjects and classes of persons.”

The STYLO France award will be presented to Dieudonné at the Bal des Quenelles, 21 June, 2015, in Saint Lubin de la Haye.

Contact:

USA: larudee@pacbell.net +1 510 232 2500
France: vanessab7717@gmail.com +33 641 93 00 39

www.stylofrance.com

Je suis Dieudonne! – RadicalPress.com

Je suis Dieudonne!! 800 copy

Jewish Terrorism & the French Police: the Despicable Case of Forty Years of Brutal Harassment of Revisionist Robert Faurisson by Robert Faurisson

robert_faurisson-1

Jewish Terrorism & the French Police: the Despicable Case of 

Forty Years of Brutal Harassment of Revisionist Robert Fourisson

By 

Robert Faurisson

August 25th, 2014

 

Residing, it seems, at times in his native Paris, at other times somewhere in Romania and sometimes in Israel, precisely at Ashdod, right beside the Gaza Strip, the thirty-year-old French-Israeli Gregory Chelli, member of the Jewish Defence League, works, notably by means of the Internet, at making the life of men and women whom he considers anti-Semitic miserable. He sets up provocations in the course of which he makes the police services look ridiculous. So far he seems to have enjoyed an impunity comparable, proportionately speaking, to that of the State of Israel itself. Up to now Alain Soral, Dieudonné and their families have been among his best-known targets.

In our turn, we – my wife and I, along with some members of our family – have had to endure his provocations. I am 85 and my wife, who is nearly 83, is in poor health: her eyesight is diminishing, she is prone to falls and, when she does fall, she cannot get back up without help; she almost always need my presence at her side; if I have to be out of the house for more than half a day I must arrange things so that she will not remain alone. From March 8, 2012 if not before, and for as long as he was able to phone us at our old number, this Chelli assailed us with a hundred calls of insults, abuse, threats (including death threats) and – I stress this point – on some of those occasions committed numerous actual assaults, details of which will be seen below. He has gone on making fun with impunity of the French police in general and its anti-violent crime sections (the “BAC”) in particular, something that costs the taxpayer dearly. The police register our complaints but nothing or almost nothing comes of them.

To begin, here is a selection of the words this thug has addressed to my wife, words that can sometimes be heard in the recordings that, not without relish, he diffuses on the Internet: “Bitch, I shit on you, I piss on you… I enjoy seeing your husband’s smashed head… I ––– you, I’m going to make your life impossible, I’m going to call your neighbours.” The “smashed head” is an allusion to photos showing me on a hospital bed after my sixth physical assault, on September 19, 1989, when three “young Jewish activists from Paris” set upon me in Vichy, where I live. From November 1978 to May 1996 I sustained ten assaults, particularly at the Palace of Justice in Paris, where the guard corps consistently refused me any protection, in direct words such as : “We are not your bodyguards!”, or “You may go to such or such place [in the building], but at your own risk!” or, from the commanding officer, a lieutenant colonel: “My grandfather was at Dachau…!”. Not once was any of my attackers or any of the organisers of the assaults arrested. In one case alone – that of September 1989 –the Jew behind anattack in which I nearly lost my life was merely questioned; he explained that on the day of the assault he had been far from the scene, at the house of a Jewish friend whose name he gave; asked to give other names, he responded that he could not because it had been the day of a masked ball… to which the friend had invited him.

I lodged my first complaint against Chelli for telephone harassment and assault at Vichy police station on March 9, 2012 (report of Guy Dablemont, police officer). I specified that the individual had also phoned two of my neighbours in the middle of the previous night, telling the first that there was a gas leak in my house and that he must go and inform me of it (and the neighbour, in a state of complete panic, did so), and announcing to the second that I was a terrorist. Both told me afterwards that they were ready to talk to the police if their testimonies were required. But the police, to whom, with their agreement, I later conveyed their respective identities and addresses, never asked them anything.

The very next day, March 10, the historian Paul-Eric Blanrue, whom I knew to be remarkably knowledgeable on the subject of Jewish activism, revealed Gregory Chelli’s identity to me, supplying a wealth of information about him which I then shared with the police. On Sunday, March 11, our grand-son B., aged 20, phoned me and my wife to say that, on orders from his father, living near Vichy, neither he nor his twin brother would be coming to visit us any longer because their father had received a phone call [from Chelli] telling him that someone was going to set fire to his house. It must be said that, in his youth, the father of these twins aspired to become a judge but had to give up his law studies because of the trouble brought on by the misfortune of bearing my surname. Thereafter he had, for the same reason, also abandoned two other possible careers and lived in fear of losing the job that he had nonetheless managed to get. He ended up telling those around him one day that he wanted to kill me. I understand and forgive him.

Continuing his campaign against me and my wife, Chelli kept up his assaults on the telephone: “Son of a whore, son of a whore, son of a whore, we’ll get you one day… We’re waiting for you to come to Paris to see Dieudonné, Soral. You’re worth shit.” I contacted the police and asked when my two neighbour-witnesses were going to be called in, as they wished to be. Answer: they will be called. In fact, as I have pointed out, they were never to be called. Second report signed by Mr Guy Dablemont, March 12, 2012. No action followed. On March 19 I obtained an interview with commander Janiszewski of Vichy police station. The man seemed amiable and interested but there was still no follow-up on the case. On March 21 I wrote to him. To no avail. Throughout the month of May at the station I would speak, four times, with Major Gay, who made a strange objection; as the case involved YouTube he told me straight out: “The police can’t do anything with [against] YouTube.” On June 21 he promised me that he would work on the telephone numbers from which the calls had been made but warned me that I would not have the right to note them or to obtain the names and addresses. On June 30, Chelli, getting my wife on the phone, told her: “We’re going to put ground glass in your ––.” On January 9, 2013 the thug, pretending to be a doctor, announced to me: “This is Chabanais [Charente] hospital. Your wife is dead.”

On February 9, 2013, with the harassment continuing, a serious incident occurred. At around 3 am, three members of the BAC showed up at our house. It seems someone had phoned pretending to be me, saying: “I’ve just been attacked by three blacks; they’re in my basement, raping my wife.” I tried to get an appointment with commander Janiszewski. Impossible. They promised me he would call me. He was not to call me. On my way to the police station I was walking up Boulevard de la Salle on the left-hand pavement. A little old man who had recently shouted at me: “Oh! You, you’ll go to hell” and who, myself making no reply, had followed after me, calling me a “dirty bastard”, was on the opposite pavement in conversation with the owner of a garage there and another person. He noticed me. He was talking loudly but I could not make out what he was saying, although it was obviously about me, and heated words indeed. This time I decided to call him to account. I went up to him and asked the reason for his attitude. He replied: “You should be ashamed, denying the existence of the concentration camps”, thereby proving he had not read anything I had written! He is a state education retiree: a former schools inspector called Jacques Thierry.

I wanted to discuss this matter with commander Janiszkewski but could not manage to contact him.

On February 21 I finally saw him. He informed me: “They’ve got [Chelli’s telephone] number” but, of course, this number was not revealed to me and I was never to know what action, if any, followed the discovery. Regarding the incidents with the retired inspector he said: “We’ll see to that later”, but nothing was seen to “later”. A new complaint was lodged, with a report bearing the signature, this time, of Bernard Manillère, police officer.

New calls, new insults on March 14, 16 and 17: “You’re still alive, –– !”; “So then, rotter, old fossil, old fossil, old fossil.” On March 19 I sent a new letter to commander Janiszewski, pointing out that the harassment had now lasted for over a year and that I knew nothing about the investigation except that the thug’s telephone number had apparently been found. No reply.

April 3, 2013: “I’ll go and piss on your grave… Son of shit… Your daughter… Your son disowned you like a dog… Your wife sells her paintings. I’m Gregory Chelli… I called your neighbour for the gas leak… I’ll make YouTube videos.”

As I ended up changing my phone number, which caused me considerable nuisance, we were no longer to receive insults, abuse or threats liable to lead to assault. But the situation would suddenly worsen.

The newspaper in France that has vilified me the most since the late 1970s, throwing me to the dogs, Le Monde, today owned by Louis Dreyfus, has this summer begun to denounce the practices of Gregory Chelli because he rebukes its journalists for their criticism of the State of Israel’s current behaviour in Palestine, particularly in Gaza. An intriguing reversal of the situation. The thug’s victim is no longer Faurisson, concerning whom the newspaper has reported virtually nothing of the attacks he has had to endure; on the contrary, Le Monde was at the head of media campaigns against the revisionists, dubbed “stubborn liars, gangsters of history”, of whom I myself would seem to be the paragon. This time the victim is primarily a weekly of the political left and of big money, Le Nouvel Observateur, or its website called Rue89. See “Qui est le hacker sioniste soupçonné d’avoir piraté Rue89?” (Le Monde, August 10-11, 2014, p. 7 or http://www.lemonde.fr/societe/article/2014/08/08/ouverture-d-une-information-judiciaire-apres-le-piratage-de-rue89_4469405_3224.html). See also: “Le Monde and Le Nouvel Observateur solidaires de Rue89”, August 12, 2014, p. 7 or http://www.lemonde.fr/actualite-medias/article/2014/08/10/attaques-informatiques-le-monde-et-le-nouvel-observateur-solidaires-de-rue89_4469720_3236.html. More specifically, the journalist concerned is Benoît Le Corre; on this subject I recommend the video at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cg-EFZkj7nI. The reporter’s father, hearing the words of the thug Chelli, has suffered a heart attack and been placed in an artificial coma; see http://rue89.nouvelobs.com/2014/08/14/vengeance-dun-pseudo-hacker-contre-rue89-vire-tragique-254205. Given the circumstances, the fact that the case should have “taken a tragic turn” does not surprise me; my own myocardial infarction of October 16, 2012 occurred in similar circumstances.

RFaurissonAttacked

I have a long experience of Jewish attacks; often they aim at the heart. On July 12, 1987, I was beaten with extraordinary violence by the Jew Nicolas Ullmann at the Vichy “Sporting Club”, with no possibility of defending myself: all his blows were to my chest which, four days later, had become one enormous bruise. “Your guy was a real bomber!” was the remark of the Cameroonian doctor at Confolens (Charente) hospital on seeing the damage. As usual, I did not bring charges because I could not afford to retain a lawyer, and experience had taught me that if there were a trial my assailant would either be acquitted on the presumption of good faith or else be ordered to pay me a pittance in damages. For many French judges my opponents are automatically in good faith. In 2007 former Justice minister Robert Badinter, who had the chutzpah to state on television that as a lawyer for the LICRA he had had me found guilty in 1981 of being a “falsifier of history”, proved incapable of proving his assertion in court during the case I had brought against him for it.And for good reason: never in my life have I been found guilty of distorting or falsifying anything whatsoever; the court had to take note of this and rule that Badinter had “failed in his offer of proof” (p. 16 of the judgment) but, the judges dared to add, Badinter had been in good faith! And, losing my suit, I then had to pay €5,000 to my extremely rich “good faith slanderer”. The year before historian Pierre Vidal-Naquet, the most worthless of my opponents, wrote on the website of Libération: “If I had got my hands on Faurisson I would not have hesitated to strangle him” (January 6, 2006). He knew that, smothered with fines and other financial penalties, I was hardly likely to prosecute him and that, in the event of a trial, he could count on a court presided over by Nicolas Bonnal, with François Cordier as representative of the Justice ministry, two friends who had taken special courses in “Shoa” history organised by the Simon Wiesenthal Centre in Paris and the Representative Council of Jewish Institutions in France (CRIF).

Suddenly, on Saturday, August 16, 2014, at 12.30 am, there appeared on our doorstep, very tense, four members of the BAC and two uniformed policemen. The BAC men had arrived on the scene with weapons and shields. The one in charge neither introduced nor identified himself. A neighbour who had not been involved in last year’s episode came out on the street in his pyjamas. He held out to one of the policemen a telephone handset on which he was still in conversation with Chelli. It is the latter who can be heard in a long recording. The neighbour, for his part, did not have all his wits about him. He ought not to have followed the thug’s instructions and come out of the house in the middle of the night as he did.

My wife is distraught. She can no longer sleep. Personally, I refuse to dwell too long on the consequences of what I call “the Jewish torture”. I do not know what the Chinese torture is but I know the Jewish torture: it is particularly vicious. My mind tries hard to erase the various incidents but my body forgets nothing. For many years it has hardly ever left me in peace, especially at night, when the cries I let out during my nightmares wake up those near me. I smile and, at times, even laugh. A matter of temperament. I laugh, for instance, with my friend Dieudonné and I adopt the judgment of Pierre Guillaume, expressed in a play on words on the name “Dieudonné”, which literally means “God-given”: “The laughter given by God is the final solution of the Jewish question” (Le rire par Dieu donné…).

I have learnt that my new file is in the hands – quite a coincidence – of Major Gay. The good man has done nothing in the past; he will do nothing in the future. Three times, in the evening, at around nine o’clock when he goes on duty, I have been to the police station to keep him informed of what, in the course of the day, I have garnered on the subject of Chelli but the matter clearly does not interest him and he asks me to take my written reports with me as I leave. Finally, on my third visit, a surprise: he informs me that my file has been sent to the regional police service (SRPJ) in Clermont-Ferrand. By a new coincidence, the file is in the hands of a commander there who, a few days ago, on a complaint of the LICRA of Strasbourg, came to Vichy to ask me fifteen questions about two articles on “Robert Faurisson’s unofficial blog”: our appointment was also at the police station. However, for the most part, I limited myself to letting him put down in his minutes my ritual sentence: “I refuse to collaborate with the French police and justice system in the repression of historical revisionism.” Amiable and smiling, he did not seem to begrudge me for exercising what, in this case, was a right under the law.

They surprise me, all those Jews along with all the people who live in the panicky fear that they have, and rightly so, of those whom I call “the Jewish-Jews”. They think I can be intimidated; however I can say that, although I have often felt fear, discouragement, anxiety, I have never known timidity. They believe I am French and intelligent. For them, after forty years of blows and injuries, trials, insults of all kinds and especially after so many attacks on my wife, my children and my grandchildren, I’m sure to break down. They are wrong. They run on blinding hatred. I do not. Admittedly, I am French by my father but, by my mother, I am British, or rather Scottish. Unlike the pure Frenchman, born clever and whose eye sparkles with intelligence, I see no reason to believe that my fight is lost before it begins. I am even persuaded of the contrary. Let’s recall the British in June 1940: they were lost. Unintelligent, they did not grasp the fact. Then, with the decisive support – at first surreptitious – of their cousins ??across the Atlantic they continued the fight and that’s how they won it. But even so, above all the reader mustn’t go and take me for an admirer of the alcoholic Winston Churchill! Under his leadership the Western Allies, perfect “democrats” that they were, offered a good part of Europe to Stalin and amassed the very worst crimes in Europe and elsewhere while their propaganda specialists, as in the First World War, lied to the fullest, ascribing, for example, to the Germans the invention of “corpse factories” which, during the new war, would become “death [by gas] factories”, built at Auschwitz or elsewhere. Their propaganda endorsed the gargantuan Jewish mystification of the alleged extermination of the Jews (which produced millions of miraculous survivors), the alleged Nazi gas chambers and the alleged six million. Finally, they incur, after the Americans, a heavy responsibility for the crime par excellence that was the judicial masquerade of the International Military Tribunal (three lies in three words) at Nuremberg, presided over by a British judge; article 19 of this tribunal’s charter pronounces that “The Tribunal shall not be bound by technical rules of evidence…” while article 21 stipulates that “The Tribunal shall not require proof of facts of common knowledge but shall take judicial notice thereof. It shall also take judicial notice of [an endless series of documents and reports signed by the victors concerning the crimes of the vanquished]…”. So it was that the Soviet report on the massacre of thousands of Polish officers at Katyn, attributing it to the Germans, was to have, like a multitude of other reports each more insane than the rest, the value of authentic evidence with no possibility of appeal, and for all eternity. Three cheers for the Allies in general and also for those Frenchmen à la Fabius who grounded their 1990 anti-revisionist law on… the Nuremberg trial!

On the strictly historical and scientific level we, the revisionists, have made all our opponents, without exception, bite the dust. To take just these examples, the Raul Hilbergs, Léon Poliakovs, Georges Wellerses, Pierre Vidal-Naquets, Jean-Claude Pressacs, Robert Jan van Pelts have been annihilated. For Hilberg, revising his first argument from top to bottom under the avowed influence of “Faurisson and others”, there was, all told, no record of extermination because, it seemed, within the “vast bureaucracy” of Germany the bureaucrats decided to proceed with the extermination of the Jews only “by an incredible meeting of minds, a consensus-mind reading”, and without leaving any written trace of their gigantic undertaking. For Poliakov, “No document remains, perhaps none has ever existed”. For Wellers the Nazi gas chambers were the greatest of possible secrets, a “State secret”. In Vidal-Naquet’s view, one must not believe his co-religionist Arno Mayer, the Princeton professor who wrote: “Sources for the study of the gas chambers are at once rare and unreliable” but should trust in Pressac and his theory of “limited gassings”; however the same Pressac, as would be discovered later, eventually surrendered in open country, deeming that, “rotten” with too many lies, the official history of the German camps was bound “for the rubbish bins of history”. For R. J. van Pelt, “the last of the Jewish Mohicans”, Auschwitz-Birkenau, visited by millions of pilgrims, contains no “physical evidence” of an extermination of the Jews.

Until recently the general public were still unaware of these “victories of revisionism” (see, with all the necessary references, the two studies I have devoted to the subject, on line respectively at http://robertfaurisson.blogspot.it/2006/12/victories-of-revisionism.html and http://robertfaurisson.blogspot.it/2011/09/victories-of-revisionism-continued.html) but thanks to the Internet and especially thanks to the arrival of a third generation after the monstrous slaughter of 1939-1945, the biggest lies of the victors of the Second World War are beginning to appear in daylight for what they are. Obviously the holocaustic or shoatic drumming and the denunciation of revisionism by the forces at the disposal of the “single way of thinking” are only worsening. What of it? An entire youthful generation is discovering the successes of historical revisionism with enthusiasm.

A Jew, Socialist and millionaire, former Prime Minister Laurent Fabius has won renown through his activity in favour of his “community” on the French and international level. He has particular distinguished himself by his personal role in the repression in France against those who dare to question the Holy Trinity of the “Holocaust” or “Shoa” religion. Under a law of July 13, 1990, often called by the joint name “Fabius-Gayssot” but which ought to bear quite simply the name “Fabius”, French judges convict and impose heavy sentences on revisionists who have concluded from their research and investigations, similar to those of the forensic and scientific police, that 1) an exceptional crime called “the systematic extermination of European Jewry” with an order and a plan of execution never took place, and that there never existed 2) an equally exceptional weapon called “gas chamber” (or “gas van”) or 3) a total of six million Jewish victims.

As for Fabius’s former wife, Mrs Françoise Castro, a Jewess, she revealed in 1986 that “[there is an] extraordinary novelty in political behaviour, the Left has allowed Jewish militias to establish themselves in some quarters of Paris and also in Toulouse, Marseille, Strasbourg [and to have] regular contacts with the Minister of the Interior” (Le Monde, March 7, 1986, p. 8). Regarding the impressive list of successes of these militias I refer the reader to a study of eighteen pages that I published in June 1995 under the title “Jewish militias. Fifteen years, and more, of terrorism in France”.

In many places in my Ecrits révisionnistes (seven volumes published, at least two others to come) specific examples of the privilege enjoyed by Jewish hoodlums, notably in the Palace of Justice in Paris, can be found. With the complicity of the higher authorities of the palace guard and of justice officials like the two mentioned above, the substitute prosecutor François Cordier and the presiding judge of the seventeenth criminal chamber Nicolas Bonnal, or the latter’s predecessor Jean-Yves Monfort (who once dared, on live radio, to call on good French citizens to cause “disorder” – sic – if not to riot in show of their support for the justice system against the revisionists), some real lynching sessions, with open force, of revisionists or their supporters have taken place in the heart of the courthouse. And not a single reporter from the mainstream media has denounced these attacks, during which the guards and, more rarely, the gendarmes act out the same appalling comedy: let the young Jews gather and strike, then run away and out of the building; whereupon the men in uniform just may start attending busily – grotesque, purely contrived scenes – to the victims like so many nannies.

To those interested in the eternal “Jewish question”, for which I personally am not at all impassioned, I recommend the writings of Hervé Ryssen. For my part, I have focused my attention on the religion of “the Holocaust” or “the Shoa”, a religion with historical pretensions which is, of course, Jewish but which reigns throughout the Western world among both the Jews and the goyim or Gentiles. It is in crisis. Too many historians have ended up showing the fallacious nature of the allegations of that alleged tribunal in which, at Nuremberg, the victors in coalition allowed themselves to try an enemy whom they had crushed and whom they held at their mercy in the worst conditions. This religion has given itself an official character: in many democratic countries, including France, its allegations regarding history have acquired the force of law.

However, if the duty of a citizen is to obey the law, it is also to fight against “the unjust force of the law”, that is, tyranny. Our duty is therefore that of Resistance against the most gigantic imposture of modern times, even and especially if it is protected by the police, the judges and the prison guards. 

In the near future it will be interesting to see the French police and justice system at work; they have been so active in assailing the freedom of inquiry and expression of revisionist intellectuals and so passive when a stop should be put to the criminal activities of a Jewish thug who, in addition to it all, makes fun of the police and judges.

I am at the battlements, observing; I will make my report.

Addition of August 30, 2014: Another neighbour of mine, owner of a restaurant in the town centre, has just revealed to me that on the night of August 16, wanting to return home, he was stopped by policemen near his house who, agitated and ready to shoot, ordered him, guns drawn, to move away because his neighbour Faurisson was extremely dangerous. It is likely that those men, having first gathered in Vichy police station before moving into operation, had not been made aware of the treatment which, for the last two years and five months, I had been made to endure by a hoaxer carrying on with impunity who, on February 9, 2013, had already staged a scenario exactly the same as what he was repeating on August 16, 2014. Had they known they would not have been in such a nervous state. But perhaps some high-placed persons wanted to let an incident occur. After all, except for one case, in the last forty years in Vichy neither the police nor the municipality has expressed any interest in the safety of a Faurisson.

——-

 

WAKE UP CANADA! By Arthur Topham

WAKEUPCANADA!

WAKE UP CANADA!

By Arthur Topham

The current global crisis in Gaza, Palestine, where the Israeli military is once again slaughtering the entrapped Palestinian people with willful intent and destroying the region’s infrastructure, has forced Canada’s major political parties – the Conservative Party of Canada, the Liberal Party of Canada and the New Democratic Party of Canada – to reveal their hand in terms of where they stand with respect to the carnage being perpetrated against the Palestinian people.

Not surprisingly, for those who have been observing the persistent, aggressive, war (otherwise known as “ethnic cleansing”) against Palestine over the past sixty-six years, all three parties have opted to “STAND WITH ISRAEL”. This revelation has astounded and angered many decent Canadians who still clung to the old belief that Canada ought to remain either in a neutral position or take a more pro-active stance and speak out against the illegal and immoral actions of the state of Israel.

What the latest round of unwarranted attacks upon Gaza has resulted in for Canada as a nation is the irrefutable and unequivocal realization that all of our major political parties and their leaders are firmly in the grasp of the Zionist-Jew controlled forces working through what is euphemistically referred to as the “New World Order” (aka NWO) and their words and deeds are but the reflective mouthings of three Zionist-controlled Puppets suspended in conscience and dangling haplessly from the covert, occult hidden hand of a tyrannical and blood-thirsty power structure that is driving the world into a state of madness, confusion and soon-to-be, endless chaos and civil strife.

We Canadians have always been told that as a nation we tend to lag about a decade behind the USA in terms of our political policies and the present example of these three zio-stooges basically confirms this assertion.

In the October, 2001 edition of my former monthly tabloid The Radical (shown in the image below) I used the same bold header as I’ve done for the present article. Only the names have been changed. That edition (13 years past) was the first reaction to the events of September 11, 2001 when this same criminal NWO cartel pulled off what was, without a doubt, the greatest false flag operation since their 1917 coup in the former Republic of Russia when the Zionist/Communist/Marxist forces were able to mastermind the absolute take-over of one of the world’s largest and diverse nations. The world we’re now living in is but an extension and magnification on a global scale of what transpired 97 years ago.

WakeUpAmEdFulPgLrg copy 3

If Canadians had any illusions as to their sovereignty as an independent nation those cherished dreams have now been shattered forever. All that’s left for Canadians who still desire peace and respect for the democratic principles that have fostered our growth and freedom as an independent nations up to the present is to accept the fact that we are no longer in control of our individual and national destinies and begin to take steps in the direction of redressing what’s happened to us a country since 911 and the advent of present global tyrannical situation that’s affecting the people and the planet as a whole.

The dilemma, for us as a nation, is having to accept the obvious fact that all of our major political parties are now controlled by the Zionist NWO. With a federal election coming up in 2015 this presents voters with a major conundrum in terms of who to vote for. Not voting is not an option but there’s still time for people to redefine their prerogatives and choose to support a party that WILL STAND FOR CANADA! It might be the Canadian Action Party or some newly formed party. The chances of the Green Party of Canada opting for pro-Palestinian, anti-Zionist policies that directly conflict with those of Israel are next to impossible yet, even there, miracles do happen.

So the final questions must be: Are we going to allow the overly preponderant power of the Jewish lobbyists here in Canada to dictate our domestic and foreign policy? Are we going to stand by submissively and submit to decisions emanating forth from Ottawa that conform, not to the wishes of the majority of Canadians, but to the Zionist-Jewish power elite that run our banking institutions, our economy, our media and our academic infrastructure? Are we expected just to give up hope that Canada will ever regain its former status as a respected member of the world community merely because of the subterfuge and deception that has allowed for the electorate to be bamboozled by the Zionist media into believing that the Conservative Party of Canada and its leader Stephen Harper would somehow STAND FOR CANADA instead of a foreign, apartheid country that treats its arab population as second-class citizens and is, in itself, the only racist, Jews-only nation on the face of the planet? Are we, in other words, willing to give up our collective rights and freedoms and bow down slavishly to the dictates of this dark and sinister New World Order or are we going to regroup, rise up and resist?

The choice for Canada is there still. If we don’t act soon though it may be too late.

God bless Canada. God bless Palestine. And God bless all who strive for freedom, love, peace and dignity.

—-

Regina v RadicalPress.com LEGAL UPDATE #19

NewLegalUpdateLogo 700

 

notice4RP

Regina v RadicalPress.com LEGAL UPDATE #19

April 10th, 2014

Dear Free Speech Advocates and Radical Press Supporters,

The previous Legal Update (March 14th, 2014) covering The Radical Press’s battle with Canada’s unjust “Hate Propaganda” legislation, as contained in Sec. 319(2) of the Canadian Criminal Code, concluded on March 13th, 2014. It was then that Judge Morgan saw fit to commit me to trial by judge and jury in the B.C. Supreme Court.

Immediately following his decision, Crown requested that a bail hearing be held that very same day. This new bail hearing was a result of Crown having re-charged me in January of 2014 with the same Sec. 319(2) offence that had originally been laid against me back on May 16th, 2012. By laying new charges this gave the Crown an opportunity to file a new application which, in turn, would allow them another chance to vary the current conditions that were set in place back on January 3rd, 2013 by Judge Church.

Det. Terry Wilson and his BC Hate Crime Team down in Surrey, B.C. were not happy with Judge Church’s decision as it allowed me (as per my Charter rights) to continue publishing on RadicalPress.com. The RCMP would rather have had its position taken; one that presumes I’m already guilty of the alleged crime and therefore should be be prevented from publishing anything further until my trial is over.

The precise wording of the Crown’s proposed new conditions was as follows:(March 14th, 2014) on RadicalPress.com’s battle with Canada’s unjust Sec. 319 “Hate Propaganda” legislation as contained in Sec. 319(2) of the Criminal Code concluded on March 13th, 2014. It was at that point when Judge Morgan saw fit to commit me to trial by judge and jury in the B.C. Supreme Court.

Immediately, following his decision, Crown requested that a bail hearing be held that very same day. This new bail hearing was a result of Crown having re-charged me in January of 2014 with the very same Sec. 319(2) offence. By laying new charges this gave the Crown the opportunity to file a new application which, in turn, would allow them another opportunity to vary the conditions that were set in place back on January 3rd, 2013 by Judge Church.

Det. Terry Wilson and his BC Hate Crime Team down in Surrey, B.C. were not happy with those bail conditions as they allowed me (as per my Charter rights) to continue publishing on RadicalPress.com rather than taking the RCMP’s position that I’m already guilty of the alleged crime and therefore should be be prevented from publishing anything further until my trial is over.

The precise wording of the Crown’s proposed new conditions was as follows:

Requested terms:

        1) You shall not post any information on any internet site that can be read by members of the general public.

        2) You shall not operate, post to, manage or allow anyone to operate, post to or manage any internet site owned by you that can be accessed by the general public.

        3) You shall make RadicalPress.com unavailable to the general public. You shall not be in breach of this condition if you place a default page on RadicalPress.com, if the wording of the default page has been previously approved by this Court.

Also, as reported in the March 14th update, Judge Morgan declined to immediately grant Crown their bail hearing on that day and advised Crown and myself that I was to return on March 18, 2014 at 1:30 to fix a date. I came back on the 18th and the date of April 9th, 2014 was then set; one that would allow me time to prepare my arguments against this latest attempt on the part of Det. Terry Wilson and the BC Hate Crime Team to shut down RadicalPress.com prior to any determination of guilt.

There was a tremendous amount of work required to prepare for the hearing; an effort that never abated until the late evening of April 8th just prior to the hearing when, having assumed I had all of my documents prepared, I suddenly found myself having to deal with yet another bit of legal chicanery in the form of an email from Crown Counsel Jennifer Johnston which suddenly arrived in my inbox at 4:29:06 p.m. that very same day. This type of behaviour on the part of the Crown has been an ongoing source of frustration from the time that my former counsel Doug Christie passed away in March of 2013. Crown, rather than furnishing me with essential documents in advance of any court appearance, apparently prefers to wait until I walk into the courtroom and then hand me whatever document(s) that she plans to use that day. To my way of thinking this is a highly unfair, unprofessional practise and I eventually brought it to the attention of Judge Morgan during the hearing.

The last minute email from Crown contained a newly revised set of bail conditions which read as follows [emphasis is mine. Ed.]:

Crown is requesting the following terms on an Undertaking to a Justice:

1) You shall keep the peace and be of good behaviour.

2) You shall have no contact or communication, directly or indirectly, with Ricardo Warmouse or Agent Z except as follows:

(a) while in attendance at court; or

(b) through legal counsel.

3) You shall not possess any weapon as defined in Section 2 of the Criminal Code expect[sic] for purposes directly related to your employment including, but not limited to, your mining operations.

4) You shall not distribute, circulate or share all or any part of the Crown disclosure material with any person or organization save and except for legal counsel who is assisting you in your defence.

5) You shall not publish or post all or any part of the Crown disclosure material on any internet site that can be read by the general public.

6) Except as set out in Conditions 8 and 9, you shall not post any information on any internet site that can be read by members of the general public.

7) Except as is set out in Conditions 8 and 9, you shall not operate, post to, manage or allow anyone to operate, post to or manage any internet site owned by you that can be accessed by the general public.

8) You shall make RadicalPress.com unavailable to the general public. You shall not be in breach of this condition if you place a default page on RadicalPress.com, if the wording of the default page has been previously approved by the Court or by your bail Supervisor and/or if you continue to pay your website provider for the RadicalPress.com site.

9) You shall be permitted to operate, post to and manage the following two websites:

a) Cariboominingassociation.com and

b) Canadianpeoplesparty.ca

On the following conditions:

i)   That none of the posts or links on RadicalPress.com be placed on either website and

ii) That you do not post anything about Ricardo Warmouse, Agent Z or Jewish religion and/or origin in any matter whatsoever.

There weren’t any delays in getting started this session and Crown, as per usual, again presented me with another packet of papers marked “Memorandum of Disclosure” just prior to commencing speaking to her application. I quickly perused the document and discovered that it contained photocopies of screen shots recently taken off RadicalPress.com by Det. Terry Wilson who monitors the site on a daily basis as he has little else to do with his time.

The first screen shot was my post, “A Dieudonne Salute to Zionism and the Forces of Darkness and Evil”. The second was John Kaminski’s latest article, The elderly are the lucky ones, and the third shot was of my post titled “Support the Radical Press Legal Defence Fund” .

CensorshipPoster600-copy

Crown immediately launched into her argument that “Mr. Topham” was still committing the same offence that he’d already been charged with on three separate occasions and then proceeded to cited the example of my Dieudonne “la quenelle” gesture as proof positive. Crown’s argument was that I had given the salute/gesture to the “Zionists” and that meant, by association, the “Jewish people” and so it must be considered a further example of promoting “hatred” toward this ethnic group. Following that Counsel then went on to speaking about John Kaminski’s article and asked Judge Morgan to read specific paragraphs where Kaminski was making direct references to the Jews in America. This article, according to Crown, was further “proof” of my continuing disregard for the law.

The manner of Crown’s presentation to Judge Morgan, regarding these posts, might best be conveyed to readers if they were to imagine someone arguing that my posting every day on RadicalPress.com was synonymous with a bank robber who, while on bail, was going out every day and robbing another bank and nothing was being done to stop him.

Finally, after what for all intents of purpose was a thinly veiled tirade against my Charter right to freedom of expression, Crown then switched from bad prosecutor to good prosecutor and proceeded to tell Judge Morgan that Crown wasn’t trying to suggest to His Honour that everything published on RadicalPress.com was “hatred toward people of the Jewish faith or ethnicity”. Here is where she made reference to my appeal to RadicalPress.com readers in the post “Support the Radical Press Legal Defence Fund”. Posts such as these, in Crown’s opinion, were just fine but, of course, the problem was that RadicalPress.com was such a “huge” site and permeated throughout with so much “hatred” toward Jews and “Zionism” that it was virtually impossible for Crown to determine how to prevent “Mr. Topham” from publishing his “hate” posts along with all the other materials that didn’t fit into the Sec. 319(2) prohibitions and so the only logical choice must be to stop Mr. Topham from publishing anything on his website until the trial was over.

Judge Morgan listened to Crown’s arguments and then began to ask questions about Crown’s proposed conditions. Foremost in Judge Morgan’s mind was the notion of shutting down the whole website because of postings which Crown was alleging were contrary to Sec. 319(2) of the Criminal Code. The judge openly stated that he had never gone on RadicalPress.com to ascertain what was or wasn’t on the site but he suggested to Crown (again) that in all likelihood not all of the content on the website was probably about Jews and Zionism and that it was a concern for him shutting down the whole site because of these alleged infractions which, for the most part, amounted to a relatively small number of disputed posts given that the site was as “huge” as Crown was inferring.

Judge Morgan also had concerns about condition No. 9 and questioned Crown about the relevancy of trying to control other websites that I might own. At this point I notified the judge that Crown had erred in stating that I was operating the website http://www.cariboominingassociation.com. Back on March 13th when Crown first presented me with the initial conditions I informed her that my mining website was http://www.caribooplacers.ca but that she had mistakenly denoted another site which I am no longer operating. Crown quickly responded by telling the judge that she would change it but first would have to get her secretary contact Det. Wilson and have him check out the website and verify if there were any “hate” posts about Jews on the site or links to “hate” sites. If there weren’t then Crown would be willing to allow me to post mining business on it.

Crown, having made its pitch to Judge Morgan, I was now asked by the judge if I had anything to offer up in my own defence.

I explained to the judge that I had both a Defence Memorandum of Argument Regarding Crown Application to Vary Bail as well as an Oral Submission. The Defence Memorandum of Argument had been prepared by a very astute and competent law student and the Oral Submission was in the form of a written document which was basically a summary of my own thoughts on why I felt Crown’s application was a draconian attempt to circumvent my Charter rights. I told Judge Morgan that I wasn’t an orator and would prefer just to read it into the court record and he was fine with that. Both these two documents were then presented to Crown and Judge Morgan. Along with the Defence Memorandum of Argument I also submitted a binder to each of them with my List of Authorities which I had referenced in my Memorandum of Argument. It contained nine cases plus a copy of Judge Church’s bail decision from January 3rd, 2013. Each binder amounted to a total of 411 pages so they were a rather formidable contribution.

BailHearing Image copy

A total of 1233 pages had to be printed off in order to complete the Memorandum of Argument

Judge Morgan proceeded to read through the Memorandum of Argument and appeared immediately satisfied with the calibre of the presentation and how it was laid out. I was basically arguing two different positions; the first being the jurisdiction of Judge Morgan to actually preside over the bail hearing now that the case had shifted to the Supreme Court and an Indictment had been handed down on March 27th, 2014. The second argument revolved around a number of Charter issues dealing first with presumption of innocence, then prior restraint to my right to freedom of expression contrary to Section 2(b) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. That was followed by the argument the conditions sought by Crown were not rationally connected to any pressing and substantive objective. The final arguments stated that the conditions sought by Crown didn’t minimally impair my right to freedom of expression and that the deleterious effects of the conditions sought outweighed any salutary effects that might be achieved.

Following some commentary by Judge Morgan I then read out my Oral Submission to the court and the judge thanked me. I will present one excerpt from the Oral Submission that pertains to the oft argued issue about the meaning of the word “hate” and its relation to Truth.

“The Truth, no matter how mortifying; how revealing; how awkward; how embarrassing; how shameful; how humiliating; how disconcerting; how ignominious; how upsetting; how distressing; how mortifying or how painful, can never be construed as being concomitant with the word “hate” no matter how much sophistry or contortions of meaning are applied to it. The Truth, simply IS, and no amount of pretence or subterfuge can ever negate that fundamental fact, even though during periods of history it has become temporarily amenable to usurpation by cold, calculating logic or other surreptitious means. Otherwise, taken to its logical conclusion, if Truth, in any context, were to be equated or aligned with the emotive term “hate” then by the same reasoning Falsehood or Lies would, in turn, become “love” and all rational discourse and communication would ultimately become moot and meaningless.”

Judge Morgan then decided around 11:00 a.m. to take a recess and said we would resume again at 1:30 in the afternoon. This would give both himself and Crown an opportunity over the lunch break to read through the materials that I had presented them with and also allow Crown some time to respond to the arguments.

We then left the courthouse and went for lunch.. Once again I was pleased that my friend and associate Paul Fromm, Director of the Canadian Association for Freedom of Expression (CAFE), had traveled to Quesnel from Ontario to attend the hearing and offer support to myself and my wife. Paul and I had lunch and discussed a number of issues related to the case as well as other matters of a general nature and then returned for the afternoon session.

Crown, I believe, wasn’t expecting the argument which I brought forth during the morning session and had obviously scrambled during the time we recessed to recoup her position. She returned to the courtroom at 1:30 p.m. with a number of case law files which she then used to argue that the judge did in fact have jurisdiction to hear Crown’s application even though Judge Morgan was a provincial court judge and the case was now in Supreme Court. That was the main thrust of her argument and when she was through Judge Morgan then told Crown and myself that he was going to reserve his decision until April 15th, 2014 at 1:30 p.m. Court was then adjourned.

——

My court battle has now moved on to an actual trial by judge and jury in the British Columbia Supreme Court. In doing so it now places a far greater emphasis on my having to obtain legal counsel and/or advice from legal counsellors, which ultimately requires funding. 
 
The trial will be the first battle in the upcoming legal war to rid Canada of all the “Hate Propaganda” legislation that has been inserted into the Canadian Criminal Code by the pro-Zionist Jewish lobby organizations since the end of World War Two. The outcome of this trial will, in all likelihood, determine whether or not the rest of Canadians will retain their right to publish the truth on the Internet about any and all injustices that may befall our country. 
 
I NEED YOUR HELP NOW MORE THAN EVER!!!  
 
Please consider a donation to the Radical Press Free Speech Defence Fund.
 
My PayPal button is on my website at http://www.RadicalPress.com
If you can’t send a donation via PayPay please consider sending what you can through Canada Post to:
Arthur Topham
4633 Barkerville Highway
Quesnel, B.C. Canada
V2J 6T8
 
Remember that every bit helps (all of us).
 
Thank you.
 
Arthur Topham
Pub/Ed
The Radical Press

 

 

A Dieudonne Salute to Zionism and the Forces of Darkness from The Radical Press

Quenelle1 copy 3

Alain Soral and Gilad Atzmon on Jewish Power and cultural narcissism Interview by Alimuddin Usmani

http://www.gilad.co.uk/writings/alain-soral-and-gilad-atzmon-on-jewish-power-and-cultural-na.html

Alain Soral and Gilad Atzmon on Jewish Power and cultural narcissism

Saturday, March 8, 2014  Gilad Atzmon

An Interview by Alimuddin Usmani 

Translated by Romain Redouin

Alain&Gilad

 

 (http://www.egaliteetreconciliation.fr)

 

“The real meaning of Jewish Power is the capacity to silence the discussion of Jewish power”

~ Gilad Atzmon

 

Alain Soral and Gilad Atzmon have each faced (and perhaps welcomed) criticism and controversy as a result of their intellectual inquiries  and honest reasoning. Neither man has shied away from politically incorrect observations including  those on issues of Zionism, culture, Europe or freedom of speech.

How  did you get to know each other?

 AS: I first got to know  Gilad through his  music. I am a jazz lover  and have long appreciated Gilad who is an internationally known and admired  musician. Gilad also played with Robert Wyatt who has been my favorite musician since I was 16.

Gilad and I met in person two years ago at the Paris Book Fair. He was there to finalize the contract of his latest book, “The Wandering Who?” which is co-published by my publishing company, Kontre Kulture.

I am blown away by Gilad’s courage  and lucidity. By culture and experience I have seen that those Jews who are able to tear the veil of tribalism to reach the  authentic universal are very rare, although they are always the best!

GA: Soral published one of the two French editions of my latest book, “The Wandering Who.” I met him at  the Paris book fair 2 years ago and in spite of the language barrier between us, I have managed to learn a lot from him. Soral is one of the last European intellectuals. And it is far from surprising that the Left is outraged by his profound political and ideological insights.

For quite a while those who oppose, satirize or criticize the domination of the Zionist lobby within French politics and media, seem to be subject to political abuse and judicial persecution. Why do you think the Zionist elite choose to target France in particular?

AS: It should be noted first that France has, or suffers from – depending on your point of view –  what is by far the largest Jewish community in Europe, with nearly 700,000 members, while  Italy or Spain, for example, have about  40,000. The pressure and the influence of this very organized  community on French power and policy are inevitably proportional to its size.

There are also some historical components that are particular to France: France prides itself on being the country of human rights, it was the first nation to emancipate the Jews of Europe, it had the Dreyfus affair, the maintained guilt of Petainism, the Zionism of the Fourth Republic, the dominance of the Grand Orient masonry on the supposedly French socialist left … These are some of the many factors that  give our “organized Jewish community” as it defines itself, its effective and overwhelming position of moral watchdog.

GA:  I think that the Jewish Lobby is particularly forceful in France as a result of the impact of the ’68 student revolution. French society has been broken into a multitude of identity groups, and the more broken a society is, the more it tends to subscribe to Jewish politics. The reason is simple. After 3000 years of tribal exilic operation, the Jewish intelligencia is the most advanced in identity sectarian politics and cultural manipulation.

The gist of identity politics is an attempt to transform the cohesive host nation into a myriad of godless synagogues.  To some extent, Soral and Dieudonné have managed to unite what is left of the French working class; which includes Muslims,  Arabs, Blacks and  Whites. And as we have seen, the Jews and the Socialists see this development as an imminent danger.

A controversial anti-immigration initiative won the backing of the Swiss electorate on February 9. EU politicians reacted harshly, some even  threatened  Switzerland. For its part, the State of Israel continues to enforce an immigration policy based  solely on the criteria of Jewish ethnicity, without receiving any criticism from the EU. How should we interpret this discrepancy?

AS: I think one of the best definitions of power, for those who have ceased to harbor illusions of democratic equality is: “Give to yourself and yourself alone the right to do the opposite of what you brutally require from others”.

The Zionist Jewish community, which dominates the Western discourse,  requires the goyim to behave as men of the left: anti-racist and anti-nationalist … While they themselves behave as far right-wing men through their shameless support of a country (Israel) which is openly racist and ultra-nationalist.

GA: It is very simple. As much as  Jewish intelligencia, wants to break the host nation, to dismantle its cohesive narrative, and debase the patriotic impetus, the Jewish State is committed to Jewish interests that represent the complete opposite of the ideology it espouses. Israel defines itself as the Jewish State and  it subscribes to a racist, expansionist, nationalist and patriotic ideology.  This may seem to be a discrepancy, but in fact it isn’t.

The above dual ethic is actually engraved in Jewish emancipation philosophy.  The Jewish Haskala (enlightenment) motto that is mistakenly attributed to Moses Mendelssohn  instructs  the Jew- “be a Jew in your tent and a man on the street.” It teaches the Israelite to behave as a Jew at home but, while in the street to pretend to be a goy. This  perplexing dishonest dualism  (one lies to God at home while misleading the Goy in the street) explains the contradiction between the Jewish intelligencia call for diversity in the West, on the one hand, and the adherence to hard core patriotism in the Jewish State, on the other hand. The Jewish Haskala dual existential mode allows a clear distinction between the ‘Goyim universe’ and the ‘Jewish ghetto.’  In practice, Jewish intellectuals would teach  the Goyim about diversity and tolerance, yet defend  vile Judeo-centrism at home, i.e., Israel.

The expression “Judeo-Masonic conspiracy” is mainly used to discredit those who criticize the bond between the Masonic and the Zionist network. Is it possible to demonstrate this bond without being locked up in a “reductio ad hitlerum”?

AS: No. The term “Judeo-Masonic Plutocracy” has cradled all the 30’s far-right discourse, so it’s now an unusable phrase.

Yet, it is enough to look at the claimed alliances currently in in the mondialist process to objectively determine that international finance, the Masonic networks and Zionism are openly working in concert to impose on us their unequal vision and domination.

GA:  For a long time I have suggested that there are no hidden conspiracies in the Jewish world – all is done in the open. I strongly suggest that instead of looking for conspiracies under the carpet, we learn to analyze mainstream news. Everything is there and in the open. In fact I argue that the real meaning of Jewish Power is the capacity to silence the discussion of Jewish power. To look for the ‘hidden agenda,’ in that context, is to surrender to Jewish power. We must do the opposite. Look into the work of George Soros, AIPAC, CRIF, CFI, Lord Levy, Wall Street, etc.

Finally what is your reaction to the strategic coalition conducted by Lebanese Hezbollah with Christendom?  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UlXek4xQd381

AS: The utmost respect.

Facing the “clash of civilizations” strategy advocated by the American-Zionists, the transcurrent alliances – Middle-class/Proletariat but also Christians/Muslims – are the only solution. It took years of civil war for the Lebanese to understand this and I just hope we will not have to go that far in this disaster in France, in order to embark on this path of wisdom.

GA: I guess that such an inevitable coalition is what torments the Jewish intelligencia as inspired by the Frankfurt School to operate forcefully against the so -called ‘patriarchal West.’ It is  possible that  true diverse humanism (as oppose to ‘diversity’)  poses the ultimate danger to Jewish cultural narcissistic chauvinism.  In true diverse humanism, we’re all united in our search for the ethical and the universal, we revert to Athenian thinking and oppose the Bernard Henri Levis and the rest of the Jerusalemite cantors.

——-

France’s Zionistas in Panic Mode as Nation Rises Up Against Jewish Plutocracy

Zionista Panic Hdr

http://www.vineyardsaker.blogspot.co.uk/

State repression in France only makes the Resistance grow stronger

Dieudonne’s music video and an appeal to French speakers (updated)

Dieudonne and his wife have made a small music video together which Dieudo put at the end of his latest web appearance.  I want to share this video with you:

Screen Shot 2014-02-08 at 11.15.15 PM

CLICK HERE TO VIEW VIDEO

Since Gallier2 has kindly translated the lyrics in a recent comment (merci l’ami!), I will also share that here:

A new wind blows over the planet, wind of renewal, it’s the wind of hope.
the one that makes the branches of the big trees dance, coming out of the night to awaken our souls.
It is born in the heart of the African forest. Dancing, slipping on the shores of the Congo river.
The wind of change, natural revolution, inspired by the stars or inspired by God.
It is here, I feel it, it wipes out my fears and strengthens my arms, it’s the wind of fight
for the emancipation of the black people and the yellows and the whites, for humanity.
A new wind blows over the planet, wind of renewal, it’s the wind of hope.
It opens our eyes and fills our hearts with the light and the faith, it’s the wind of joy.
And the chests are swelling and the fists are closing. Mister President lost his drive.
In the face of the shouting gun, the people gather. It’s him who advances and the king who retreats.
Everywhere the bullets whistle and death is close but I don’t tremble, I’m here standing still.
It’s over, we will live, not retreating, you can kill me and kill my family.
You will not be able to stop this wind, it has awakened us, the sun has risen.
It warms our hearts, make our children smile and turns off our fears, fills us with courage.
It’s the end of the lies, the begin of the march, we will not go back in obscurity…
A new wind blows over the planet, wind of renewal, it’s the wind of hope.
The evil one clings to the branches of his tree, resists stubbornly until losing his senses
No one resists the big wind of faith, either you bow or die Mister Liars
A new wind blows over the planet, wind of renewal, it’s the wind of hope.
Now I’m well, I breathe and I see. I feel and I believe in hope, in life.
The wind is still here, until when? I don’t know. Whatever we will see, it’s here and I believe in it
A new wind blows over the planet, wind of renewal, it’s the wind of hope.
A new wind blows over the planet, wind of renewal, it’s the wind of hope.

Lastly, I have also extracted the mp3 music track from the video and uploaded it to Mediafire to share it with you.  You can get that track here:

https://www.mediafire.com/?3ku4eihiu6afkp3

One more thing for the French speakers here – Alain Soral has recently released an absolutely amazing video about his latest public appearance.  Check it out here:

http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x1abt94_conference-d-alain-soral-a-marseille-vers-l-insoumission-generalisee_news

I will be honest here – I cannot do that myself simply because of a lack of time.  But guys, if somebody could translate and subtitle his speech that would be an ideal way to make Soral better known to the English speaking world.  So if anybody of you could do it, please do and then upload the video somewhere and let me know and, of course, also let the folks at E&R know (email me if you need their email address).

As for me, I will write another post about Dieudo and Soral in the very near future.  Stay tuned.

Kind regards,

The Saker

‘”THE FRENCH ARE BUBBLING WITH RAGE!!!!”

Last November I wrote a piece entitled “Is a new revolution quietly brewing in France?” in which I described the struggle which was taking place between the French people and the Zionist plutocracy which has ruled France over the past decades (roughly since 1969) and today I am returning to this topic as events have rapidly accelerated and taken a sharp turn for the worse.  A number of most interesting things have happened and the French “Resistance” (I will use this collective designator when speaking of the entire Dieudonne/Soral movement) is now being attacked on three levels.

Intellectual level:

This is, by far, the most interesting “counter-attack”.  A well-known French commentator, Eric Naulleau, agreed to a “written debate” with Alain Soral in which both sides would discuss their differences and the transcript would be published in a book entitled “Dialogues Désaccordés” (which can roughly be translated as “detuned dialogs” or “dialogs out of tune” or even “disagreeing dialogs”).  To explain the importance of this publication I have to say a few words about Naulleau himself.

Screen Shot 2014-02-08 at 11.31.21 PM

Eric Naulleau

Everybody in France knows Eric Naulleau as one of the two partners of a “journalistic tag team” called “Naulleau and Zemmour” in which one of the partners – Eric Naulleau – is a Left-leaning progressive and the other – Eric Zemmour – is a Right-leaning conservative.  Together they form a formidable and, sometimes, feared team of very sharp and outspoken critics and commentators which was featured on various shows on French TV.  Zemmour, in particular, is an extremely intelligent and very charming person whose wonderful sense of humor combined with an outspoken attitude often got him in trouble.  He is one of the few French Jews who actually got sued by the notorious LICRA (rabid Zionist organization formed by Trotskyists to attack those opposing them) for daring to say “French people with an immigrant background were profiled because most traffickers are blacks and Arabs… it’s a fact” on TV.  Together, Naulleaua and Zemmour are known for being formidable debaters and very tough and even blunt critics who can take on pretty much anybody.

Naulleau explained that, according to him, it made no sense at all to ban Soral from the mass media because that still gave the option for Soral to record his show on the Internet where they would be viewed by millions of people (that is not an exaggeration, by the way, Soral’s videos do score more views that some national TV channels!).  Naulleau explained that in his videos Soral was always alone, free to say whatever he wanted, without anybody contradicting or challenging him and that his goal was precisely that – to unmask, challenge and defeat Soral in an open debate in which he would show all the fallacies and mistakes of Soral’s theses.  To say that Naulleau failed in his goal would be an understatement.  Soral absolutely crushed every single one of Naulleau’s arguments to the point where I personally felt sorry for Naulleau (whom I like a lot as a person).  Worse, not only did Soral absolutely obliterate Naulleau, he also made a prediction and said: “you will see the shitstorm which will hit you for agreeing to make this book with me!”.  And that is the crux of the disagreement between Soral and Naulleau: do the Zionists control the French media yes or not? Can they blacklist somebody or not?  Is there a shadow “Zionist censorship” in France or is public speech still free?  Soral’s thesis is that France is in the iron grip of a “behind the scenes” Zionist mafia which is exactly Naulleau vehemently denies.  The problem for Naulleau is that he proved Soral to be right.

The French media immediately attacked Naulleau for “providing Soral with a platform to spew his hateful theories” to which Naulleu logically replied that Soral was already doing so on the Internet and that, besides, he – Naulleau – did not believe in censorship but in a strong and free debate.  Naulleau also got attacked for not saying this or not saying that – in reality for getting so totally defeated by Soral in the debate. The book, by the way, became an instant bestseller which, indeed, made it possible for even more French people to think through Soral’s arguments and make up their own mind.  So, ironically, and even though Naulleau clearly wanted to challenge Soral, he did him a huge favor by allowing him to break the media blockade around his name – Soral is never ever invited on a talkshow – and by allowing the ideas of Soral to come right back into the public debate via this book, Naulleau de facto helped Soral.  Some have even speculated that Naulleau might be a secret sympathizer of Soral and that he did all of this deliberately.  I don’t believe that at all – Naulleau is sincere, and Naulleau is also naive: he is now only slowly coming to grips with the fact that Soral’s core thesis – that the Zionists completely control the French media – is a fact and that Soral’s prediction about Naulleau getting in trouble for this book was spot on.  Right now, Naulleau and his friend Zemmour still have a show on a small local TV station, but clearly Naulleau has now deeply alienated the French plutocracy.  As far as I know, nobody has dared to speak in Naulleau’s defense.  The funniest thing of all is that even though both Soral and Naulleau are officially coauthors of this book and even though Naulleau attempts to deny that Soral is blacklisted, only Naulleau got interviewed on the French talk shows, never Soral.  Not once.  What better way could there be to prove Soral right?

“Personalities lynch mob” level:

While Naulleau was trying to defend himself against attacks from all sides for daring to coauthor a book with Soral, something absolutely unprecedented took place: day after day after day, media personalities were shown on TV trashing Dieudonne and his “quenelle” gesture.  This really looked like a “virtual lynching” or a Stalinist trial – politicians, journalists, comedians, commentators, actors – you name it – all took turns to ridicule, insult, denounce and otherwise express their hatred for Dieudonne.  This truly became an Orwellian “two minutes of hate” in which Dieudonne was designated as the target of an absolutely vicious hate campaign.

Screen Shot 2014-02-08 at 11.32.08 PM

Bedos as “Dieudo Hitler Bin Laden”

A mediocre comedian named Nicolas Bedos was even given 12 minutes of uninterrupted air time to compare Dieudonne to both Hitler and Osama Bin Laden and his shows to a Gestapo interrogation room.  It was surreal, really.  If an extraterrestrial had just tuned in and watch this display of vicious hatred he would have imagined that Dieudonne was a 2nd Hitler about to invade France with a huge army of bloodthirsty Nazis.  For me, it was clear that the reason why all these different personalities were standing in line for the chance to outdo each other in taking a shot at Dieudonne was to prove their loyalty to the Zionist “deep-state”.  This was as transparent as it was sickening.  And again, it proved that Soral was right and that, if anything, he was under-estimating the degree of control of the Zionist plutocracy over France.

State level:

Finally, from being more or less covert, the persecution of Dieudonne and Soral by the French state became completely overt.  I already mentioned how in early January the French Minister of the Interior, Manuel Valls, used his powers to ban the latest show of Dieudonne (see here and here).  Over the last weeks, this repression has reached a new level with even more lawsuits against Soral (12 simultaneous lawsuits, see Google-translated list here) and administrative harassments (evening “visits” by bailiffs, abusive arrests, threats, police search of his small theatre in Paris) against Dieudonne.  All these events taken together – and it is really not hard at all to connect the dots – for a very clear picture: the power of the state is used to persecute, harass and repress Dieudonne and Soral.  And that, of course, just goes even further in proving that Soral is right in his central thesis about France being run by a shadow occupation “deep government” whose loyalties are not to the French people, but to the Zionist plutocracy and Israel.

The reaction against this state of affairs is also becoming stronger and the amount of people supporting Dieudonne and Soral has literally skyrocketed.  The reason for that is not only that a lot of French people share the same views as Soral and Dieudonne, but also a deep running French cultural tradition of admiring rebels and disliking the state.  Add to this that Hollande is the most hated President in French history and that the French economy is doing down the tubes triggering untold suffering and rage in the people suffering from the crisis, and you get a very explosive mix: the so-called “Day of Rage”.

Check out these videos before they are removed form YouTube (like this one):

Screen Shot 2014-02-08 at 11.14.10 PM

CLICK HERE TO WATCH VIDEO

 

Screen Shot 2014-02-08 at 11.14.25 PM

CLICK HERE TO WATCH VIDEO

 

Screen Shot 2014-02-08 at 10.52.45 PM

CLICK HERE TO WATCH VIDEO

 

Anybody who knows France well will tell you that this is very serious stuff because unlike other demonstrations which typically oppose a law, or a policy or a specific event, these demonstrators clearly are rejecting the legitimacy of the entire political system: they want regime change.  So far, the French media has tried to minimize the coverage of this event and the French elites are trying hard to pretend like this is some small, fringe, extremist group, which is utter nonsense.  France is bubbling with rage.

Zionist panic:

The Zionists are actually aware of that, and they are now in the panic mode.  Just take a look at the headlines of this Israeli-French website:

JSSnews-Dieudo-panic

 

On the top right, you can see the Israeli founder of this website – Jonathan-Simon Sellem and on the top left you see Arno Klarsfeld, a well-known “French” (Israeli/German/French) lawyer and rabid Zionist.  Here is what they are quoted saying:

Jonathan-Simon Sellem: “Dieudonne, you will never be a martyr.  You will not a hero.  Your name will be cursed in history, by history”.

Arno Klarsfeld: “They is a crucial moment in history: Jews are already beginning to leave France”.

Clearly, these two gentlemen see Dieudonne as some modern mix of Agag, Hamman, Titus, Hitler and Bin Laden – a terrifying, bloodthirsty and infinitely dangerous and evil man who threatens the survival of the Jewish race (never mind that Jews are not a race).

Could that be a little bit of an over-reaction?

What are these folks so terrified of?

I think that the answer is obvious: what they are so terrified of is not that Dieudonne and Soral will reopen Auschwitz somewhere near Paris, or that French Jews will be expelled from France.  They know that this is paranoia (which Gilad Atzmon calls “Pre-Traumatic Street Disorder”) is absolute crap: French Jews are safe, happy and welcome in France and nobody is seriously out there to do them any harm.  No, what this small clique of  Zionist Jews (representing a tiny fraction of the much more diverse French Jewry) really fears is that the truth about them and their power over the French deep-state will come out.  And this is not only about Jews.  There is a non-Jewish plutocracy formed around the Jewish core of French bankers and financiers which is also completely in bed with the Zionists and whose future depends on maintaining the Zionist control over France: politicians, of course, but also actors, journalists, academics, etc. – a full constellation of Shabbos Goyim willing to do Israel’s Sayanim’s dirty job for them.  It is this entire elite and the system which it built which is threatened by Soral and Dieudonne and by what the movement “Equality and Reconciliation” stands for: a union of all the French people (native or immigrants) which together are determined to resist the Zionist oppression of France and who, just as in WWII, will resist the occupier until the Liberation.

When and how could such a “Liberation” occur?

I don’t know.  These events are very complex and multi-dimensional and it is, I believe, impossible to predict what could happen.  What I am sure of, is that this movement, this Resistance, will not be crushed, nor will it somehow magically disappear.  To paraphrase the Communist Manifesto, the French people “have nothing to lose but their chains”: their country is ruined and they are ruled by an evil foreign occupier.  In terms of dynamics, every move which is made against Soral and Dieudonne only makes things worse for the occupation regime – the harder the strike, the harder the blowback.  The legitimacy of the regime, in particular, is greatly affected by such absolutely ridiculous actions like the “overkill” of a Minister of Internal Affairs using the highest court in the country (the State Council) in an emergency session to ban a single comedian’s stand up show.

Sure, for the time being most people in France comply, obey, or look the other way.  But everybody know, everybody understands and very few believe in the official lies, especially in the younger generation.

This all reminds me of the Soviet Union of the 1980s where externally nothing much was happening and where the system itself look ugly but safe.  Russians were making anti-Brezhnev jokes at private parties while the KGB from time to time arrested dissidents.  But nobody – not even the KGB officers – had any respect for the system, the regime, the official ideology and its propaganda.  Everybody did what they were told, but nobody believed in what they were doing.  That is the exact situation not only for the French cops who are constantly used to ban, harass and arrest Dieudo and his supporters, but also of an increasing percentage of the general public.

Right now the pressure on the dam is getting stronger and stronger, and the cracks more and more visible.  So far, the elites have had enough fingers to stick into the cracks, but this is clearly a futile attempt to delay the inevitable.  And when the French dam will burst, it will impact not only France, but also a good segment of western Europe.  So while the pro-US Ukrainian nationalists want to subordinate their country to the EU, the EU is threatened with an inevitable and violent explosion.  But, like on the sinking Titanic, the media’s “orchestra” will be playing its music until the last second.

The Saker

Don’t Laugh! It’s “Anti-Semitic”! – International Zionism’s Crusade Against Dieudonné and The Global Jewish Assault On Freedom of Speech by Jonathan Azaziah

 
http://www.maskofzion.com/2014/02/dont-laugh-its-anti-semitic.html

Screen Shot 2014-02-05 at 10.50.53 PM

“To smile when confronted with the most severe oppression, is an act of Resistance rooted in unparalleled beauty.” ~ Jonathan Azaziah

Tuesday, February 4, 2014

Don’t Laugh! It’s “Anti-Semitic”! – International Zionism’s Crusade Against Dieudonné and The Global Jewish Assault On Freedom of Speech

by Jonathan Azaziah

Screen Shot 2014-02-05 at 9.48.08 PM

Is it not astounding, nay, the very apogee of mind-boggling, that “democracy”, the globe’s dominant political model, in which “freedom of speech” is a central if not foundational tenet, is vehemently and vitriolically doing all that it can, wherever its outposts are throughout the world, to silence, nay, eradicate, one particular criticism and ipso facto anyone who has the nobleness to promulgate the aforesaid criticism?

“Imperialism”? Fire away! “White supremacy”? Have at it! “Capitalism”? Sky is the limit! “Dictatorship”? Here’s an appearance on “Democracy Now”! Malevolent social injustices like police brutality, political corruption, patriarchy, gentrification, environmental abuses, etcetera? By all means, preach and don’t stop preaching! But the moment an individual takes a deep breath, performs a swift trip around the earth in his or her mind, and sees with his or her mind’s eye that there is a common insidiousness, a parent evil if you will, that permeates every ill and injustice from north to south and east to west, and he or she then calls it out by name and slams it with a thunderous condemnation, that is when the rubicon is crossed.

Mention Zionism, “Israel”, Judaism and the supremacy inherent to the religion-culture under the doctrine of “chosen-ness”, Jewish power or Jewishness in any “activist” circle, let alone any mainstream avenue, and you will be hexed and cast out quicker than you can even blink. The “Z”, “I” and “J” words are tantamount to career suicide at best and a terribly real threat to one’s life at worst.

Indeed, it was the 18th century French philosopher Voltaire who famously said, “To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.” Not only have the words never rang as true as they do in this current point in history, it is not without irony that Voltaire himself was considered to be a staunch critic of the Organized Jewish community of his time.

And on that note, we find ourselves in the thick of the case of Dieudonné M’bala M’bala, better known as Dieudonné or simply Dieudo to those who support him, the controversial, brilliant, wildly popular French-Cameroonian comedian who over the last decade or so has taken France by storm with his anti-Zionist, anti-establishment, pro-Palestine, pro-Resistance sketches and routines, much to the ire of International Jewry. Fined, ridiculed and banned on numerous occasions throughout the years, Dieudonné has trucked on steadfastly. It is integral to understand what has befallen him, as his ongoing struggle against his detractors is a microcosm of the global Jewish-Zionist assault on genuine, unmitigated freedom of speech.

Nicolas Anelka and The Quenelle: Jewish Hysteria Reaches A Fever Pitch

AnelkaPM

On December 28th, 2013, the legendary international football star and current West Bromwich Albion striker Nicolas Anelka, who won the World Cup with France in 2006 and has played with top clubs across Europe for almost two decades, set off a chain of events that he could not have possibly imagined would ever come to fruition. After scoring his first of two goals during that Saturday match, Anelka performed the “quenelle”, an anti-establishment gesture popularized by Dieudonné which essentially means “up yours”. Alarm bells began ringing across Jewish-Zionist power centers across the globe and before the grueling match which ended in a 3-3 draw was even in the books, Anelka was being deemed an “anti-Semite” in the international press. West Bromwich Albion coach Keith Downing blasted the accusations as “absolute rubbish” (1).

Utter ridiculousness aside, an investigation was immediately initiated by the FA (Football Association), and after a little more than 3 weeks, Anelka was charged with “making a gesture that was abusive and/or indecent and/or insulting and/or improper”, as well as “an aggravated breach in that it included a reference to ethnic origin and/or race and/or religion or belief”. He was punished with a 5-match ban (2). Additionally, Zoopla, a British property website owned by Jewish businessman Alex Chesterman and a main sponsor of West Bromwich Albion, cut its sponsorship of the club because it wouldn’t drop Anelka (3). Chesterman’s pressure is only the tip of the iceberg however, as the entire campaign against Nicolas Anelka was driven by the organized Jewish community, notably the Board of Deputies of British Jews and the Community Security Trust (4), a dangerous organization with connections to the international Zionist terrorist organization known as the Mossad (5).

Screen Shot 2014-02-05 at 9.48.49 PM
It is by no means coincidental but rather part and parcel of the horror that has been inflicted upon Nicolas Anelka that the chairman of the FA is David Bernstein, a devout Jew who has repugnantly used his position to spread “Holocaust” propaganda wrapped in the garb of football to the UK’s youth (6), and an ardent Zionist who gleefully turned the “Football For All” platform into a whitewashing festival of the usurping “Israeli” regime’s genocidal existence (7). Equally critical to note is the fact that while are very few Jewish players in British football, Jews run the vast majority of the Premier League. Among these owners is Roman Abramovich (8), an obscenely wealthy Zionist gangster involved in “Israeli” blood diamond dealing and the ethnic cleansing of occupied Al-Quds (9). Point being? Nicolas Anelka adamantly denying that he is racist or “anti-Semitic” (10) is ultimately irrelevant due to the undeniable truth that the Jewish persons controlling British football have a Zionist agenda that is global in scope.

To add further insult to injury, Nicolas Anelka endured another dose of heavy embarrassment after Roger Cukierman, the president of CRIF (Representative Council of Jewish Institutions in France), initially stated that Anelka’s performing of the quenelle in that particular context was not “anti-Semitic” but then backtracked once it was clear that the football star would be charged, going as far to say that the usage of the quenelle was being “dangerously spread among our citizens and especially youth.” Zionist fanatic Cukierman continued on in a rabid tirade against Dieudonné (11), proving beyond a shadow of a doubt that “free speech”, “democratic ideals” and the truth above all else are of no concern to Jewish supremacists when their agenda is hanging on by a thread; all of those attributes aren’t merely denied but trampled upon with malice.

Onslaught On Dieudonné: World Zionism Mobilizes To Muzzle Him

Screen Shot 2014-02-05 at 9.49.04 PM

Verily, Nicolas Anelka and his career are just collateral damage in this ongoing debacle. As the author of a recent venomous, hysterical editorial in the staunchly Zionist Jewish Daily Forward opined, “it is Dieudonné who is the true villain in this saga.” The piece, titled “‘Zoopla’ Joins Gibberish Feud Over ‘Quenelle’”, goes on to take jabs at Anelka, label the quenelle as “neo-fascist” and viciously attack Dieudo for the “crime” of bringing Jewish-Zionist power to light and not making any bones about it in the process (12). And this is only the tip of the anti-Dieudonné iceberg. In the wake of the madness sparked by Anelka’s quenelle, an avalanche of hasbara was generated by Organized Jewry against the comedic phenom.

To name a minute few: The “Israeli” daily Ynet insanely labeled Dieudo a “modern day brown shirt” and lambasted the quenelle as a symbol of “modern day violent anti-Semitism” (13); the Jewish Daily Forward, in one of many attacks, notes that “the real danger is that Dieudonné is also pulling down the government’s shorts (14).” It isn’t the French regime that the Forward is worried about though, but the “Israeli”-blue-and-white-drenched hands behind it; Haaretz assailed Dieudonné for having “malignant influence (15)”; the Algemeiner gleefully carried the statements of the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) which repeatedly condemned Dieudo (16), and along with the European Jewish Congress (EJC) and the umbrella group of Belgian Jewish organizations, CCOJB, played a key role in pressuring the French regime into cracking down on the French-Cameroonian star (17). Tablet Magazine, a most obnoxious Zionist rag owned by a brat of the immensely wealthy and powerful Newhouse family, published several hit pieces but one in particular glaringly stood out as it admitted that the quenelle is “hard to explain and harder to resist (18)”, thus exposing the intellectual bankruptcy of International Jewry and its agents.

Leading the campaign against Dieudonné have been the aforementioned CRIF, France’s AIPAC, and LICRA (The International League Against Racism and Anti-Semitism), the French version of the ADL. LICRA, which has been agitating against him for over a decade now since he first criticized Zionism, has special privileges under French law, and, in blatantly similar fashion to a powerful mafia, has been using one nonsensical pretext after another to justify lawsuits that would lead to his blacklisting (19).

Screen Shot 2014-02-05 at 9.49.19 PM

The CRIF-LICRA campaign paid dividends as the mayors of Marseille, Tours, and Bordeaux banned Dieudonné from performing in their cities on January 7th, 2014 (20). Two days later on January 9th, 2014, a French court threw out the bans, much to the delight of Dieudonné and his fans. Unfortunately, victory was declared too soon however as CRIF revved up the pressure (21), and with Zionist lapdogs President Hollande and Interior Minister Valls leading the charge, the overturn of the bans was unprecedentedly flipped at the last minute by Conseil d’Etat, France’s highest court, just before a Dieudonné show in Nantes (22), hence removing him from as many public forums as possible under the banner of “anti-racism”, arguably the most legendary and deceptive mask of Zion in existence today.

[Read more…]

‘Jews out of France!’ by Ari Soffer

FRENCH PRES. copy 2

RadPressEditorNew1 150

Editor’s Commentary: Down through history we find recorded a tediously telling litany of “cries” for the Jews to leave various European nations. In practically every instance the primary reason for their expulsion was the Jew’s practise of usury which, inevitably led to the same situation that we have today – nations saddled with such huge deficits owing to the Jewish banking firms that their governments are unable to deal with all the subsequent pressing economic and social repercussions that naturally result from a lack of financial solvency. With millions and billions and trillions of taxpayer’s dollars going into the coffers of the Jewish banking houses every nation thus affected by this practise of fractional reserve banking sinks further and further into arrears owing the Jews and eventually finds itself under their absolute control.

The recent cry “Jews get out of France” during the Jew’s “International Holocaust Remembrance Day” is but a resurgence of an age old scenario that the world has witnessed again and again when it comes to the Jews and the inevitable outrage that they provoke in whatever host country they inhabit thanks to their “power of the purse” and the manner in which they use that power to suppress and repress the host nation so that all intrinsic forms of fundamental sovereignty become meaningless. In the case of France once again the government has become so indentured to and controlled by the Zionist Jewish forces within the nation that the people are rising up in revolt just as they did on three previous occasions since the 14th century. So many nations and city states have done the same thing as well and for the same reason.  Below is but a partial list of the countries from which the Jews have been banished due to their inability to adjust to and merge with the rest of the population and refrain from their nefarious and usurious ways.

Mainz, 1012; France, 1182; Upper Bavaria, 1276;  1290, England; France, 1306; France, 1322; Saxony, 1349; Hungary, 1360; Belgium, 1370;  Slovakia, 1380; France, 1394; Austria, 1420; Lyons, 1420; Cologne, 1424; Mainz, 1438; Augsburg, 1438; Upper Bavaria, 1442; Netherlands, 1444; Brandenburg, 1446; Mainz, 1463; Mainz, 1483; Spain, 1492; Italy, 1492; Lithuania, 1495; Portugal, 1496; Naples, 1496; Navarre, 1498; Nuremberg, 1498; Brandenburg, 1510; Prussia, 1510; Genoa, 1515; Naples, 1533; Italy, 1540; Naples, 1541; Prague, 1541; Genoa, 1550; Bavaria, 1551; Prague, 1557; Papal States, 1569; Hungary, 1582; Hamburg, 1649; Vienna, 1669; Slovakia, 1744; Moravia, 1744; Bohemia, 1744; Moscow, 1891.

The Jewish author, Bernard Lazare, in his 1894 book, Anti-Semitism, Its History and Causes, states:

“If this hostility, even aversion, had only been shown towards the Jews at one period and in one country, it would be easy to unravel the limited causes of this anger, but this race has been on the contrary an object of hatred to all the peoples among whom it has established itself. It must be therefore, since the enemies of the Jews belonged to the most diverse races, since they lived in countries very distant from each other, since they were ruled by very different laws, governed by opposite principles, since they had neither the same morals, nor the same customs, since they were animated by unlike dispositions which did not permit them o judge of anything in the same way, it must be therefore that the general cause of anti-Semitism has always resided in Israel itself and not in those who have fought against Israel.”

But such revelations, even by Jews themselves, never seem to sink into the consciousness of those responsible for the deeds that ultimately lead to the same unsavory reactions that we’re witnessing in France today.

Here in Canada, another nation deeply indebted to Jewish financial interests, Jewish lobbyists like the masonic B’nai Brith Canada, who instigated the initial Sec. 13(1) hate complaint against myself and RadicalPress.com back in 2007 and later in 2012 the criminal “hate crime” charge of Sec. 319(2), are constantly crying the blues to the RCMP, the courts and the country, through their Jewish controlled mainstream media, that any and every negative criticism of their overt and covert actions, be they here or in Palestine or anywhere else throughout the world, are simply based on “anti-Semitic” attitudes unrelated in any way with the harsh economic realities of the times we’re living in; realities precipitated upon nations by the direct, willfully premeditated actions of the Jews themselves.

One only needs to read this typically Zionist Jew news article and view the short video clips to see and understand the magnitude of denial that continues to permeate the Jewish mindset of today. Everyone who questions Jewish power and corruption is an “anti-Semite” and a “hate-monger” and a “holocaust denier” and therefore, according to the Zionist Jew’s logic, whatever legitimate arguments the mass of protestors are presenting to the French government on the streets of Paris should go unheeded as they are only saying those things because they are filled with “hatred” and “holocaust denial”and “loathing” for the poor downtrodden Jews who have been unfairly persecuted and mistreated forever merely because of their superior religious beliefs.

Given this attitude of unrepentant denial by the Zionist Jews in the face of a growing global awareness of the crimes and willing deception of the general population of people around the planet by world Jewry it’s highly doubtful that what we’re witnessing in France today is going to simply subside. All the “hate crime” legislation in the world won’t stop the common people from expressing their anger and disgust at what their governments are doing to them and their nations. Should this repugnant and arrogant attitude of denial on the part of the Jews continue unabated we can only look forward to more and more nations rising up in outrage and moral indignation and demanding that their governments cease their incestuous relationship with the Jewish power brokers and begin the arduous task of dismantling the infrastructure of usury and deception which has allowed the Zionist Jews to gain such incredible power over independent nations.

________

http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/176876#.UurHVfbK7gG

‘Jews, Out of France!’

Chilling video shows hundreds of anti-Semites on the march in Paris, illustrating the frightening rise of anti-Semitism in France.

By Ari Soffer
January 29th, 2014

img456432

Illustration: Anti-Semitic demonstration
Reuters
It is nothing short of chilling.

A video, taken on the eve of International Holocaust Remembrance Day, shows masses of French protesters marching down a Paris thoroughfare chanting openly anti-Semitic slogans and calling on Jews to get out of France.

Chants include “Jews, France is not yours!” “Jews out of France” and “The story of the gas chambers is bull***!” At one point, in a show of raw, seething hatred, the crowd simply spits out the word “Jew, Jew, Jew!”

Many of the marchers can be seen giving the “quenelle” inverted Nazi salute popularized by anti-Semitic comedian Dieudonne. The gesture is seen as a way for anti-Semites to give a Nazi salute without incurring the wrath of authorities – although one demonstrator can be seen giving a full-on Nazi salute as well.

Screen Shot 2014-01-30 at 1.47.24 PM

Click here to watch video

It was part of a “Day of Anger” called by anti-government activists in protest of a variety of “anti-establishment” causes. French police estimated that around 17,000 people had attended the march, and said that 250 had been arrested. Police told AFP news agency that 19 police officers were injured in clashes with demonstrators, one seriously.

Despite claims by Dieudonne and some of his supporters that it is simply an innocent “up yours” or “anti-establishment” gesture, it has been adopted by a vast range of anti-Semites, from the far-right to Muslim extremists, many of whom post online pictures of themselves making the salute in front of sensitive sites such as Holocaust memorials, synagogues, and even the school in Toulouse at which an Islamist gunman murdered a rabbi and three Jewish children.

Dieudonne himself has a long history of anti-Semitic comments and shows, including a recent video in which he implies the Jewish victims of the Holocaust may themselves be to blame for their own genocide.

Apart from the quenelle gestures, the marchers can clearly be heard singing a song mocking the Holocaust composed by Dieudonne, entitled “Shoananas”. The song is yet another masterful attempt by Dieudonne to trivialize and legitimize anti-Semitism; it is a play on the Hebrew word for the Holocaust (Shoah) and the French word for pineapple (ananas).

Screen Shot 2014-01-30 at 1.47.43 PM

View video HERE

The footage provides the most alarming evidence yet that the popularization of anti-Semitism by the bigoted French comic is reaching terrifying heights, and raises serious concerns for the country’s Jewish community.

France’s Jewish community – the third largest in the world (after Israel and the US) – is seeing an unprecedented exodus, and the continuing tide of anti-Semitism has triggered preparations in Israel for a major influx of olim (immigrants to Israel) from the country.

A recent poll by the EU’s Fundamental Rights Agency recorded that 40% of French Jews fear publicly identifying as Jews, and that 75% of European Jews feel that anti-Semitism is on the rise.

——-

The ‘Personal is Political’ Unless You Happen To Be Black. By Gilad Atzmon

 

http://www.gilad.co.uk/writings/the-personal-is-political-unless-you-happen-to-be-black.html

Screen Shot 2014-01-17 at 1.12.05 PM

CLICK ON THE URL TO VIEW VIDEO: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v8xxIqQQjsw

The ‘Personal is Political’ Unless You Happen To Be  Black.

Monday, January 13, 2014 

My latest comment on the vile campaign Against Dieudonné:

Yesterday, in Amsterdam Airport, on my way to Japan,  I gave this short interview.

We spoke about the onslaught of the Black French comedian. i exposed the French Left ideological hypocrisy.

For the Left and Jewish ethnic activists the ‘Personal is Political’ unless you happen to be  Black.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v8xxIqQQjsw

Seemingly, my comments are received well in France. This clip had 40.000 viewers in just a few hours.

English translation of La Quenelle

Screen Shot 2014-01-09 at 8.50.44 PM

CLICK HERE TO VIEW VIDEO

CBC Broadcasting Corporation Spews Forth More Anti-Dieudonne Pro-Zionist Propaganda

cbcstory600

Click HERE to watch the news clip

RadPressEditorNew1 150

True to the deformity we know as Zionism, Canada’s so-called “Canadian Broadcasting Corporation” aka “Zionist Controlled Broadcasting Corporation” is now spewing forth more of the same Zionist lies that their colluding cousins at the BBC are spreading about French comedian and anti-Zionist activist Dieudonne M’bala M’bala and the French anti-Zionist resistance movement that is growing stronger by the day.

gourroutouroutisiComedian Dieudonne and French philosopher Alain Soral

It’s time that Canadians realized that their own “Made in Canada” broadcasting corporation is nothing more than a recycled “Made in Israel” corporation that has branch networks spread throughout the western world, all thinly disguised so as to give the impression that they are truly nationalist corporations with the very best interests of their respective nations at heart. Unfortunately for the Zionist Jews who control all of these nations’ governments and their puppet politicians the veneer of deception has now worn so thin that the ugly face of their NWO agenda pockmarked with their endless lying and deceit are showing through the cracks and disgusting more and more honest citizens who feel a deep sense a loathing whenever they’re subjected to the now overtly transparent propaganda that the Jew controlled media inevitably conjures up to try and stem the tide of truth that is now clearly washing ashore around the world.

ZBCFramed 700

And it’s always the same worn-out epithets and stale, thread-bare, hate-inspiring justifications that we hear repeated ad nuaseam.

Dieudonne (known to his friends and admirers as “Dieudo”) is slandered and accused of being an “anti-Semite” (oh veh! how original).

He’s called a “holocaust denier” (oh, my Lord! shall we hear this over and over 6 million times a day on the Jew Tube?).

thScreen Shot 2014-01-09 at 8.42.36 PM

He’s accused of having invented the infamous gesture known as the (or “la” if you prefer) Quenelle which the Zionist Jews are now attempting to do a 180?spin on and change the meaning from that of an “Up the Establishment” or “Up your ass” gesture to one that they want people to think is an upside down, half-assed, Adolf Hitler (horror of horrors!) salute!

No shit. Next thing it will be shape-shifted into a whole new regime of “HATE GESTURE LAWS” legislation with which to persecute and harass anyone who so much as reaches down their leg to scratch their crotch or their knee! Just think of the legal repercussions for all those Jewish lawyers out there defending anyone who happens to move incorrectly and gets spotted by a Zionist Jew who’s on the look out for upside down Hitler salutes everywhere they look. What next? Will it be a crime to flash a peace sign?

Look at all those anti-Semitic, racist, hate-mongering holocaust deniers in the composite photos below. What a bunch of neo-nazi terrorists! Why they’re everywhere you look.

QuenelleComposite

QComposite2

In fact the whole freakin’ gong show of Zionist psychopaths is turning into just what Dieudo has been making his living from for many years now – a comedy (of unending Zionist errors).

The more the Zionist Jew lobby and their slinking, slimeball sycophants attempt to control the sentiments of the vast majority of decent, common folks who are sick and tired of the Z’s control-freak, paranoid, lying ways the greater their hypocrisy appears and all the more laughable their panic-stricken ploys to vilify and criminalize truth revealers like Dieudonne, Alain Soral and the thousands upon thousands (if not millions) of others who feel the same way about the maniacal Jewish lobbyists and their cold, calculating agenda for control of every emotion, thought and idea that humans naturally come up with when oppressed.

So watch the short C[Z]BC “news” clip that comes to you direct from Britain via the C(Z)BC’s own correspondent and see how they attempt to malign and lie about what is really going on in France today. Could they be preparing for the same type of uprising right here in Canada and playing the same old deck of deceptive cards? Time will soon tell.

—-

Gilad Atzmon on Dieudonne and the Quenelle (viral Video)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WpbI-Z2anlw

AtzmonVid

CLICK HERE TO WATCH VIDEO

http://www.gilad.co.uk/writings/gilad-atzmon-on-dieudonne-and-the-quenelle.html

Gilad Atzmon on Dieudonne? and the Quenelle (viral Video)

la Quenelle

By Gilad Atzmon

If the quenelle is loosely defined as an anti establishment salute,  one may wonder why Jews are offended by it and regard it as an ‘anti-Semitic’ gesture?  Is it because many Jews actually identify with ‘the establishment’? And how do we explain the fact that the French government is happy to compromise the most elementary liberties just to appease the French Jewish Lobby (Crif)?

The truth is devastating – Palestine is here and the French people are the Palestinians Du Jour

The French Palestinian Solidarity Deserves a Quenelle! by Ariadna Theokopoulos

http://www.boldfacenews.com/french-palestinian-solidarity-fights-anti-semitism/BOLDface News logo

Wednesday, January 8, 2014

By

Ariadna Theokopoulos

France is the middle of a sweeping popular movement sparked by Dieudonné and symbolized by la Quennelle, a movement that has united young and old, white and black, men and women, the middle class and the unemployed, extreme Left, center and Right, Christians and Muslims and even a few Jews.

It is an anti-establishment revolt but also one specifically directed at the Jewish power that rules the French establishment and has destroyed individual freedoms long cherished by the French, like freedom of speech. The French appear to have had enough of forced indoctrination into the worship of the Holocaust (a topic Dieudonné has dared to ridicule in his comedy sketches), of laws throwing historians in prison for daring to question the official Holocaust narrative, of the foreign policy of France being conducted according to the dictates of CRIF (the French equivalent of AIPAC).

It is a peaceful revolt, employing a gesture, not words, in a state muzzled by anti-free speech laws, one that mocks Power and says, “We are no longer afraid of you.” It is precisely that message that has sent the French Israeli Firsters into a hysterical panic: that “they” are no longer afraid and that a single spark was sufficient to unite all segments of society that JP had worked for so long to atomize and set against each other.

The measure of their panic is given by the preposterous, Orwellian ways in which they propose to silence and punish Dieudonné. The French Interior Minister, Mon. Valls (the same one who declared that through his wife he is eternally tied to Israel) has instructed (he prefers the word “advised”) the mayors of all French towns to forbid any performances of Dieudonné anywhere, in any venue. “You will never work in this country again!” Another contemplated measure is to form a joint commission of no less than three ministeries: Interior, Justice and Economy, to find modalities of punishing Dieudonné in all possible ways: depriving him of liberty, ruining him finnacially. He already owes close to 100,00 Euros in fines for offending speech.

Now in the middle of all this popular revolt, a progressive voice that despite its French accent sounds so very familiar, speaks out… against Dieudonné! It is Jean-Claude LeFort, President of the Association France Palestine Solidarité (AFPS):

“Pour qui­conque suit objec­ti­vement les faits, les gestes et les propos de Dieu­donné, la chose ne peut prêter à aucun doute pos­sible : son anti­sé­mi­tisme est patent. Il n’est pas accep­table. Le racisme, redisons-??le avec force, n’est pas une opinion mais un délit. Nous le condamnons par principe, absolu et non dis­cu­table, mais aussi par nécessité poli­tique : il nuit ter­ri­blement à la cause du peuple pales­tinien dont Dieu­donné fait mine de se réclamer.

Ses propos ont été condamnés par la justice à de nom­breuses reprises. Et la loi doit s’appliquer sans la moindre mansuétude.”

French is a beautiful language but abject groveling sounds as foul as it does in English.

In free translation, with emphasis added:

“To those who follow events objectively, the gestures and statements of Dieudonné leave no doubt: they are patently anti-semitic. It is unacceptable. Racism, let is restate it strongly, is not an opinion but a felony. We condemn it by principle, absolute and undebatable, but also by political necessity: it harms terribly the cause of the Palestinian people which Dieudonné claims to support.”
His statements have been condemned by judicial authorities many times. And the law must be applied in full force.”

Not making the “fight against anti-semitism” a priority of the Palestinian solidarity, I am sure, would “harm terribly the cause” of their funding. Who’s your daddy, Jean-Claude?
AFPS, like their English-speaking brethren “give no quarter” to “anti-semites,”  and they support punishing them “sans la moindre mansuétude!

AFPS, this quennelle is for you:

th

—–

source: http://www.boldfacenews.com/french-palestinian-solidarity-fights-anti-semitism/

French Dissidents Defy Jewish Tyranny By Brother Nathanael Kapner

http://www.realjewnews.com/?p=882

Screen Shot 2014-01-08 at 11.36.06 PM
French Dissidents Defy Jewish Tyranny

By

Brother Nathanael Kapner

January 8, 2014 ©

“WE WANT OUR COUNTRY BACK!” barks Nigel Farage of the United Kingdom Independence Party.

Screen Shot 2014-01-08 at 11.31.54 PM

“Nothing short of a full, free vote will take our country back,” says Farage.
But who decides what candidates the Brits can vote for?
If it’s the moneyed Jewish Lobby in EnglandThe Jewish Leadership Council and Conservative Friends of Israel—then either party’s candidate will be working for the Jews and NOT the Brits.
Please answer this question, Mr Farage:
If Hague, your foreign policy minister, and Cameron, your prime minister, both appear kissing up to the Jews on the above Jewish Lobbies’ Websites, what chance do you have for a “full” vote in England?
JEWS decide who you can vote for. Jews decide who will live and who will die. Both parties (like Jewmerica) are ruled by JEWS.
So much for ‘taking back’ England. But the French have a history of making heads roll.

Screen Shot 2014-01-08 at 11.32.16 PM

VIVE LA FRANCE!

 

BECAUSE JEWS HATE THEM, two former enemies are now friends.
French comedian, Dieudonne M’bala M’bala, and French philosopher, Alain Soral, have found common ground in opposing Jewish censorship and political manipulation.
Both banned from public media, Soral and Dieudo have rallied around the quenelle controversy— (alleged Nazi salute in reverse)—building a political movement which is enjoying spontaneous enthusiasm among the French people.
Called Egalite et Reconciliation, the movement advocates a common cause on issues faced by both French Christians and Muslims.
Both are opposed to homosexuality, (pushed by the Jewish Lobby in France); destruction of the traditional family via same-sex marriage; and imperialism.
In an attempt to stop the movement, French courts have banned Alain Soral from publishing 5 of his books which the CRIF (French version of AIPAC) deems as ‘anti-Semitic.’ (Read: Facts exposing Jewish tyranny.)
In response, Soral plans to publish the Holy Gospels daring the Jews to demand that the ‘anti-Semitic’ passages from the life of Christ be expunged.
And in succumbing to Jewish pressure, (his career depends on Jew-money and influence), French president Hollande has enforced a ban on Dieudonne’s upcoming performances in Bordeaux, Marseille, Nantes, and Tours.
But as the saying goes, they who live by the censors’ sword will die by the peoples’ fury.

Screen Shot 2014-01-08 at 11.32.32 PM

HEADS WILL ROLL

FREE-SPEECH-HATING JEWISH GROUPS: CRIF (French AIPAC) and LICRA are branding Dieudonne’s and Soral’s followers as “Nazis.”
Both organizations are demanding criminal charges be made against these dissidents.
To the Jews’ dismay, this makes the movement even more popular…using the Internet to bypass the Jew-controlled MSM with Dieudo’s Videos showing large, packed theaters of fans roaring with laughter.
While the quenelle gesture means “up yours,” Jews—Bernard Henri Levy at the lead—say it’s a “reverse Nazi salute” that “sodomizes” the victims of the Holocaust. (An example of Jewish hysteria in reverse.)
But the VERY popular Dieudonne is fighting back. Humor targeting Jewish hysteria is erupting into a firestorm. (There’s plenty of Muslims in France with thousands of sympathizers who know how to take to the streets.)
Dieudo turned Le Chant des Partisans into: “Francois la sens tu qui se glisse dans ton cul la quenelle?”…”Francois [Hollande] do you feel the quenelle sliding up your ass?”…
And the French can’t get enough!Watch and Listen Here & Here.
Finally, what the Jews shove up everybody else’s derriere, a grassroots movement in France is shoving it back up the Jews’ backsides.
With vicious Jews in full view: • Dr Richard Prasquie (CRIF); • Alain Jakubowicz (LICRA); • Pierre Moscovici (Economy Minister); • Bernard Henri Levy (Jew Media fabricated phony ‘intellectual’); • Laurent Fabius (Trade Minister); • Vincent Peillon (Education Minister)—instead of backsides, heads could roll.
This time, instead of King Louis XVI, it could be a basketful of Jewish heads.
___________________________________