Liberal Homofascist $104 million Whatcott Libel Hearing Update by Bill Whatcott

Liberal Homofascist $104 million Whatcott Libel Hearing Update

By Bill Whatcott 

February 9th, 2017 

OntSuperiorCrtFeb8_zps3yfsyovh.jpg

Some Christian supporters standing outside the Ontario Superior Court and Ontario Law Society building in downtown Toronto, protesting against the $104 million dollar lawsuit and in support of religious liberty and free speech. I didn’t join them in the protest (as I was asked by my counsel not to) but I did thank them for coming out and publicly standing with us and let them know that I appreciated them being there.

Dear Friends,

My first day at Ontario Superior Court got off to a bit of a raucous start. I noticed on the homosexual side no actual supporters came out to support the litigants. Only the two homosexual activists George Smitherman and Christopher Hudspeth who are suing me for $104 million dollars and their rather bloated legal team of two lawyers Dr. Scott Fairley, Doug Elliott and three articling students/ paralegals came out to the hearing. On my side a dozen or so supporters came out, along with me and my two lawyers, Dr. John Findlay and Dr. Charles Lugosi. The courtroom that was reserved for us was rather small and could not fit all of us. The court clerk (who seemed hostile to my side) announced some of the people who wanted to see the court proceedings were going to have to leave.

A few rabble rousers who I did not really know showed up to support me and they started arguing with the court clerk that everyone should be accomodated and no one should have to leave as people have a right to an open court and that means being able to see the proceedings. The court clerk became visibly angry and an argument broke out between her and the rabble rousers. I cringed and encouraged people to be gracious when in court, but I must note if the rabble rousers did not speak up some people would have missed the court proceedings. As it was, the court clerk after arguing with the rabble rousers was able to find a couple more chairs and everyone who came out to support me was able to see the proceedings.

Unfortunately, once people were seated one of the ladies who was with the rabble rousers decided to use her smart phone to start recording the court proceedings. The homofascist lawyer Doug Elliott noticed her doing this and alerted the court and insinuated I was known to do things like that. The judge ordered her to shut off her phone immediately. In actual fact I was rather annoyed with her and rebuked her when the court recessed and my lawyer expressed his displeasure with her as well. The lady left shortly afterwards. One of her friends who left with her had his own experience with Canadian censorship as he spent two years in prison for criticizing the Islamicization of Canada.

Much of the oral arguments made by the lawyers centred around technical issues as to whether or not a class action lawsuit was an appropriate vehicle to sue me and my supporters for infiltrating the homosexual pride parade with my truthful and accurate Gospel flyers (disguised as “zombie safe sex packages) that warned of the health, social and spiritual harms related to the homosexual lifestyle.

DSCF2629_zpsifcywhen.jpg

Homosexual pride marcher in the 2016 Toronto Homosexual Pride Parade marches with a picture of my Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ painted on his crotch.

The homofascist side argued my flyers were “hate speech,” that they were prima facie illegal, that they deserved no legal protection, and that they harmed the marchers and Liberal Party members who marched in the Toronto homosexual pride parade. Conversely, the homofascist lawyers called the Toronto homosexual pride parade an “advancement of democracy.”

The homofascist side argued my flyers were “hate speech,” that they were prima facie illegal, that they deserved no legal protection, and that they harmed the marchers and Liberal Party members who marched in the Toronto homosexual pride parade. Conversely, the homofascist lawyers called the Toronto homosexual pride parade an “advancement of democracy.” While the homofascist lawyers cited my Whatcott Supreme Court decision as evidence my flyers are “hate speech” that hurts homosexuals and Liberals, I noted neither the Whatcott Supreme Court decision, nor the two homofascist lawyers arguing this case produced so much as a shred of evidence that anyone was seriously harmed by my flyers. They simply parrot this falsehood as if it is fact. At one point the homofascist side compared my flyers attacking the Liberal Party members who support homosexual pride to the Ku Klux Klan’s murder of white people who were supportive of black rights and ending segregation.

In the afternoon the court clerk yelled at my supporters that they would be removed from the courtroom if they made anymore noise. In actual fact my supporters were very quiet and I heard no noise at all. During the afternoon break I found out two of my supporters brought on the court clerk’s wrath because they quietly exchanged a note between them that was written on paper expressing a thought about what was said in the court case. I noted George Smitherman played on his phone during court quite a bit but the court clerk said nothing to him.

The lawyers for my side argued (in my opinion effectively) that the class action was not an appropriate vehicle to sue me for alleged defamation and hate speech at the Toronto homosexual pride parade. My side also did a good job in arguing my flyers are not ‘hate speech’ and are in fact a legitimate part of the democratic debate in Canada. I would love to show you my flyers that were disguised as “Zombie Safe Sex” packages, but I won’t be able to until these proceedings are over, I suspect the flyers contained pictures of diseases that are common afflictions related to the homosexual lifestyle, statistics related to diseases that ravage the homosexual subculture, accurate information on the complicity of Liberals in child sexual abuse, and the Gospel. Not surprisingly the homofascist side regurgitated the error in fact promulgated by the Supreme Court of Canada that I call all homosexuals pedophiles. In actual fact I never said that, nor do I believe that to be true. But my flyers do articulate correctly that the homosexual subculture is more tolerant of sex with children than the mainstream culture and the Liberals, just like their LGBT allies appear to be more tolerant of child sexual abuse than they ought to be. Liberals and homofascist lawyers might not like hearing that, but truth while no defense in so-called Canadian human rights law, is a defense in defamation and if the shoe fits one should wear it.

The hearing will continue tomorrow. Those who wish to witness in favour of religious liberty will be doing so at the corner of Queen St and University at 9:00 am.

The hearing will continue from 10:00 am to 4:00 pm in courtroom 9….

In Christ’s Service

Bill Whatcott

“But when they deliver you up, do not worry about how or what you should speak. For it will be given to you in that hour what you should speak.”

Matthew 10:19

GoGetFunding-660x330_zpss53vef7k.jpg

https://gogetfunding.com/help-christian … n-lawsuit/

SOURCE ARTICLE

CBC Prince George Reporter-Editor Betsy Trumpener: Lying, Anti-free Speech Hack Agent for B’nai Brith Canada’s League for ‘Human Rights’ By Arthur Topham

screen-shot-2015-02-08-at-6-30-10-am-copy

CBC Prince George Reporter-Editor Betsy Trumpener: 

Lying, Anti-free Speech Hack Agent for B’nai Brith Canada’s League for ‘Human Rights’

By Arthur Topham
Publisher & Editor
The Radical Press

betsycbcziotroll

Betsy Trumpener CBC “reporter”Prince George, B.C.

As the Constitutional Charter challenge to Canada’s notoriously unjust, Zionist-created “Hate Propaganda” legislation contained in Sections 318 to 320 of the Canadian Criminal Code was due to commence in Quesnel, B.C.’s Supreme Court on Monday, October 3rd, CBC’s Prince George reporter-editor ran a hit piece on the hearing that was posted to the CBC website on September 30, 2016 under the title of B.C. man convicted of promoting hate on web to challenge law in court today.

Due to a court order imposed upon Topham prohibiting him from publishing the names of the traitorous scumbags who’ve been attacking him and his family and website for the past 10 years this article cannot post a direct link to the Trumpener article.

The slanderous excuse for an objective news story was pure Zionist vilification of Arthur Topham, Editor and Publisher of RadicalPress.com that consisted of lies, half-truths and mis- and dis-information.

Trumpener, who has been following the case of R vs Roy Arthur Topham since Topham’s trial back in Oct/Nov. of 2015, has been publishing lies and half-truths about the case in an attempt to portray the publisher of the alternative news site as an “anti-Semitic, Racist, Jew-hater” who’s been using his website to publish articles calling for the “sterilization” and “genocide” of all the Jewish population in order to resolve the “Jewish Problem” once and for all.

In her most recent repulsive screed aimed at defaming Topham’s motives and character, Trumpener, without speaking to Topham and getting his perspective on the case and the Charter challenge, interviewed the Zionist Jew scumbag B’nai Brith agent from Victoria, B.C. who had filed the Sec. 319(2) against Topham back in May of 2011 and prior to that had also filed a Sec. 13 complaint to the Canadian Human Rights Commission back as far as 2007 alleging that Topham was “promoting hatred toward people of the Jewish religion or ethnicity and/or citizens of Israel”. No shit. Promoting “hatred” toward citizens of the foreign, racist, Jews-only state of Israel.

Trumpener then quotes the lying scumbag Mossad operative known as “Agent Z” and publishes all of his bullshit lies about Topham including the most insidious falsification of all – that Topham was calling “for the sterilization of all Jews” and that, in the scumbag’s demented mind meant “incitement to genocide”.

The same lying Israeli sayan Trumpener had sat through the trial back in 2015 and knew full well that the scumbag from Victoria was lying when he made these statements. She knew that this agent for the foreign racist, supremacist, criminal state of Israel was misquoting statements from a satire that Topham had posted on his website called Israel Must Perish!  This hack “journalist” also knew that Israel Must Perish! was a satirical response to a REAL BOOK published back in 1941 in the USA by a JEWISH writer by the name of Theodore N. Kaufman, titled Germany Must Perish! 

Trumpener was aware that Topham had merely chose some of the more juicey and outrageously hateful sections of the real book of Kaufman’s and then digitally reprinted them VERBATIM. The only alteration of the actual text of the real book was when Topham changed the words “Germany” and “German” and “Nazi” and “Hitler” to “Israel” and “Jew” and “Zionist” and “Netanyahu” in order to transform the original, lurid production of Kaufman’s into a satire or parody of the original work.

It was Kaufman in his book Germany Must Perish! who was calling for the total sterilization of the German population in order to wipe out the German race. It was Kaufman who actually wrote and published this book and when it was placed on the market for sale this heinous publication calling for the absolute genocide of the German population was endorsed on the back cover by some of the leading and most prestigious newspapers and magazines in the United States. Time Magazine and the Washington Post as well as the New York Times and the Philadelphia Record (as illustrated below in the graphic showing the actual front and back covers of the book) all added their voices to the Jewish call for the “total sterilization of the German population in order to wipe out the German race.”

“The lying hack “journalist” Trumpener from CBC Prince George also was cognizant of the fact that in creating the online, digital satire of Kaufman’s book Topham had explained to his readership why he had come up with idea of satirizing Germany Must Perish! and the bottom line rationale for doing so was that the Zionist Jew lobbyists here in Canada had been falsely accusing and vilifying Topham in their Zionist controlled media (including CBC) for close to a decade and calling him a “hater” and a “racist” and an “anti-Semite” and Topham finally had had enough of these hypocrites and bigots calling the kettle black when, in truth, their own tribe of Jewish hate-mongers were the REAL HATERS and ADVOCATES OF GENOCIDING THE TOTAL GERMANIC RACE!”

actualcopyoffrbkcovergermmustper
The lying hack “journalist” Trumpener from CBC Prince George also was cognizant of the fact that in creating the online, digital satire of Kaufman’s book Topham had explained to his readership why he had come up with idea of satirizing Germany Must Perish! and the bottom line rationale for doing so was that the Zionist Jew lobbyists here in Canada had been falsely accusing and vilifying Topham in their Zionist controlled media (including CBC) for close to a decade and calling him a “hater” and a “racist” and an “anti-Semite” and Topham finally had had enough of these hypocrites and bigots calling the kettle black when, in truth, their own tribe of Jewish hate-mongers were the REAL HATERS and ADVOCATES OF GENOCIDING THE TOTAL GERMANIC RACE!

So the satire appeared and when the scumbag Agent Z from Victoria, B.C. saw it he immediately saw his opportunity to twist it around 180 degrees and use it to accuse ME of wanting to genocide the “whole Jewish population”. He filed his complaint with the faggot Det. Cst. Terry Wilson of the BC Hate Crime Team and Wilson swallowed Agent Z’s story hook, line and sinker (along with who knows what else) and proceeded to commence an investigation that eventually led to the arrest and incarceration of Topham on May 12th, 2012 and the Sec. 319(2) charge of “promoting hatred toward people of the Jewish religion or ethnicity”.

It never seemed to have registered on the scumbag Agent Z or Det. Cst. Terry Wilson OR the BC Attorney General’s office who laid the charge that if Topham was calling for the “genocide of the total Jewish population” then he should have been charged under Sec. 318 of the Criminal Code NOT Sec. 319(2) because Sec. 318 deals with the promotion of genocide.

That folks is what the lying, hasbara Israeli reporter from CBC should have published in her story about Topham’s Charter challenge to Sec. 319(2) for that is the TRUTH about what happened and why Topham was framed and exploited and incarcerated and dragged through over four years of endless litigation. But then of course that’s NOT what B’nai Brith Canada wants done and CBC, given that it, as well as all of Canada’s major mainstream media, are controlled by the Zionist Jew lobby, instead publishes the LIES that the Zionist Jews want published.

So the question remains – who are the real haters in this psycho-drama now unfolding throughout Western civilization and when are they going to be held accountable for their traitorous acts against Canadian citizens?

——

The bravery of old women By John Kaminski

braveryofolderwomenhdr

The bravery of old women

Detoxifying the disinfo that keeps us enslaved

INSPIRING THE YOUNG WITH COURAGEOUS GRACE AND AUTHENTIC INTEGRITY

By John Kaminski
pseudoskylax@gmail.com
http://therebel.is/news/kaminski

“Only lies need to be protected by laws. The truth stands on its own.” 
— Monika Schaefer, Canadian fiddler
recently blacklisted for thoughtful Holocaust video

We are the ones who make war. We allow war to be made in our names. Millions of people have died because of the lies we refused to challenge. Millions more today and tomorrow will die needlessly because we remain silent and/or ignorant of the secret forces that engineer our enslavement and profit from our indifference.

Today’s heroes are old women, no longer shackled by social etiquette, directly describing the culture of crime that keeps them from living securely in their homes. The world needs to listen to them.

The main paradigm in the battle for people’s minds, I was surprised to learn, turns out to be the Holocaust issue, which half the world has been taught to be afraid to discuss. Too many careers have been ruined for even mentioning the subject. Since Roman days (according to Cicero), the behavior of our governments is directly determined by what Jewish influence will permit.

Belief in the Holocaust allows the Jews to maintain a sacrosanct status that attempts to solicit pity for their self-inflicted suffering. This despicable act camouflages their worldwide financial crime syndicate, which is fueled by the guilt of their imagined persecution projected upon the duped goyim. The worldwide phenomenon of Holocaust reparations — the payment of today’s generations for yesterday’s supposed crimes — has allowed the Jews to rob several European countries of hundreds of billions of dollars.

The latest object lesson in the annals of Holocaust swindles involves a Canadian violinist who had the temerity to record a YouTube video titled “Sorry Mom, I was wrong about the Holocaust” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E0_BZphQ7Qo. But as the video goes viral, Monika Schaefer’s violin jobs are disappearing amid petty whispers about her Nazi sympathies.

The longtime activist has dared transgress the taboo about talking about the events of World War II in a way that is not approved by Jews, which in most European countries and especially Canada can earn such truth tellers quick and long jail sentences.

Schaefer’s disheartening ordeal was recapped on Red Ice radio https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CLGJJF9tssA Her trouble with the Canadian government is reported here http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/edmonton/hate-speech-complaint-filed-against-jasper-woman-for-holocaust-denial-video-1.3679917.

Schaefer’s courageous efforts at promoting historical truth follow on the audacious ordeal 87-year-old Ursula Haverbeck has undertaken simply by talking about the lie Germans have been living since the end of World War II. Haverbeck’s courageous YouTubes and articles about the true, non Jewish facts about World War II recently earned her a nine-month prison sentence, but more importantly created yet another disgraceful example of the Jewish kangaroo courts of Germany, in which truth is no defense and the events of World War II may not be discussed candidly.

A heroine for the truth
https://carolynyeager.net/ursula-haverbeck-once-again-sentenced-jail-germany

Jailed for questioning history
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jR25qa_xTpE

It used to be the young who would wax heroic while advocating for justice and social change, but now it is the wise old women refusing to put up with the silly and toxic artificiality that keeps the entire world locked in a hermetically sealed auditorium where everything may be discussed except the 360 degree Jewish control of reality which poisons the motives of everything it seeks to control.

When patriotism becomes plunder, it’s time to revisit our allegiances. When justice serves only some it is actually serving none.

The Holocaust issue is shunned by many because of the dangers it presents to ordinary people who want to keep their jobs. The dilemma employers face when their employees exercise their free speech rights is that Jewish word of mouth campaign soon deprives these employers of its regular customers. Owners know the score and are faced with the reality that if they pay employees who oppose Jewish policies and mythologies, advertisers and other customers mysteriously disappear.

The much-talked-about Holocaust is the central metaphor in a culture taught to live in an artificial reality, buy artificial products and services, and live artificial, inauthentic lives. That we are not allowed to talk about the Holocaust is emblematic of not being able to talk about our own government’s murderous policies, which make plenty of money for kosher investors and gentile traitors, but very little for the average working class goy.

Plus there is the little matter of killing people for money — something American culture appears to approve of, as politicians say one thing and do another.

The financial difficulty Americans find themselves in today has resulted from spending all that money — all our money! — on wars for Israel and weapons for everyone.

The newspeak of George Orwell’s dark forecast for the future has long since passed into being. The United States in 2016 is a vigilante strike force for Jewish interests, which control every aspect of American society. War is peace. And a little tear comes to your eye as you wave your yellow ribbon at the steady stream of corpses from wars that never needed to happen, and mourn the deaths of all those who never needed to die.

During the time I have been foraging down these mental corridors of thought known as the Internet I have detected the consistent presence of a strong cadre of righteous old women who don’t really need to be informed about the disappointments and deceptions of the world.

The actions of Schaefer and Haverbeck to shatter these shackles that have been placed on our brains serve as beacons for others to follow, had they but the courage to recognize that the information that is poured down upon us by oligarchic politicians and cookie cutter commentators speaking what they are told to speak is all pure poison, meant to deceive us into supporting things most of us would never do in our real lives, and then punishing us for not being more enthusiastic about the disgusting crimes these psychos are committing in our names, in your name.

Do you take responsibility for all these atrocities, and say what really should be said about them, as these women have with such dignity and reasonableness? Or will you continue to remain silent and believe in the false facts that have deformed your lives and now threaten your future?


John Kaminski is a writer who lives on the Gulf Coast of Florida, constantly trying to figure out why we are destroying ourselves, and pinpointing a corrupt belief system as the engine of our demise. Solely dependent on contributions from readers, please support his work by mail: 6871 Willow Creek Circle #103, North Port FL 34287 USA.
http://therebel.is/news/kaminski
http://johnkaminski.info/
http://www.rudemacedon.ca/kaminski/kam-index.html
http://www.serendipity.li/john_kaminski_articles.htm
http://web.archive.org/web/20040323232319/http://johnkaminski.com/

Talmud-driven Marxist materialism at the root of all discriminatory “hate crime” legislation

TalmudHateCrimes

Talmud-driven Marxist materialism at the root of all discriminatory “hate crime” legislation

ATEDITOR0216

[Editor’s Note: Wallace’s reply to Australian Senator Bernardi is a worthy and required read for those who struggle with the whole notion of political correctness and how and why it suddenly made its appearance on the truth-telling scene over the past half century. While it may be useful to read Senator Bernardi’s article first it’s not necessary in order to appreciate what Mr. Klinck is saying on the topic as a whole.]

Dear Senator Bernardi,

Thanks for your latest bulletin.

The “anti-discrimination” activists are engaging in classic Bolshevik tactics of intimidation and they are using both the legal system and the conditioned naïveté of the general population to use the very constitutional and legal framework which historically we have developed essentially in accord with Christian principles to protect basic natural rights and freedoms, literally and subversively as a reverse instrument of terror, in order actually to destroy them. This is being done with an appeal to our innate sense of decency and essential fairness by inducing in us a guilt complex which renders us helpless and defenceless when we would oppose any issue purely and obviously fabricated in a way that is intended to make everything we think or do appear as having selfish and evil motivations designed to exploit other less privileged people. This strategy is pure, unadulterated cultural Marxism in action.

What people do not seem even to suspect is that this policy derives from Pharisaism—the rule by decree enforced by a self-appointed select few who arrogate to themselves the supreme right to dominate others on the assumption that they alone are divinely destined and ordained to determine, prescribe and adjudicate every aspect of the lives of other persons. There is absolutely no theoretical limit to the measures or degree to which these people will go to establish this power and anyone who thinks that there is a limit to their ambition is sadly, and fatally, deceived. Law is the area of their expertise and it is primarily in Law that they act to establish their tyranny. What did Christ say about “lawyers” and the Pharisees? “Beware the Leaven of the Pharisees!” This no doubt sounds all entirely far-fetched and anachronistic to those who are not schooled in ideological and theological matters—but, sadly and unfortunately, it deals with the metaphysical and practical world in which we live. It all seems almost surreal, but is an obvious and undeniable tragic reality. Those who succumbed in the hell of the Bolshevik Gulag could attest to that ersatz reality wherein all were to be made “equal”—as has, e.g., Alexandr Solzhenitsyn, who could by instinct and observation detect the moral and intellectual decline of the West.

One might ask how this situation can be—or why it should exist. But such questions alone are no solution to our problems, which require sound and practical policies and actions predicated upon realistic principles. The fact of the matter is that our culture has been stripped methodically of virtually any Christian awareness we may once have had and, if Christ was indeed the Great Realist, we have no longer any firm ground upon which to stand. The opinion-making media, the educational system, the clergy and the socio-economic institutions all have been captured and co-opted and in general have thoroughly infected society with false notions about scarcity, morality and the purpose of human existence in general. C. H. Douglas was not making a frivolous or misconceived allegation when he declared that “Society has been hypnotized and only a drastic de-hypnotization can save it.” The problem is fundamentally metaphysical and what must be done is to replace the existing system of false values with an entirely new ethic of social and economic values based upon essential Christian precepts and principles which we must proceed to incarnate in our daily organic affairs. We must give “Flesh” to the “Word” in order to make of it a reality rather than a parody.

In this regard, we must cease our rejection of the Abundance of the Kingdom by outright faithless denial, and the diversion and perversion of our human and natural resources increasingly toward useless and destructive purposes which serve the advantage of third interests. We must establish in place of the existing acquisitive economic and social order one which is properly distributive and does not rely upon ever expanding financial debt. We must assure material security for all persons so that in security faith can “cast out all fear” and, indeed, “move mountains.” We must create a dispensation wherein “Every man can sit under his/her own fig tree and none can make them afraid.” We must discredit and destroy the absurd myth of scarcity and the hurtful circumstances which such belief imposes upon humanity. This must be done so as to empower the individual while diminishing the alleged need for an increased assumption of power by the State.

The existing financial and economic system which insists upon paid “work” as the exclusive source of income, while the opportunities for it are increasingly diminished by the amazing phenomenon of escalating technological efficiency, causes individual insecurity to be increasingly endemic and with it entirely unnecessary, growing and fallacious demands for more “jobs”. Of course where economic survival is dependent upon paid labour everyone clamours for more “work” and demands access to it. In a society that is conditioned to believe that Salvation is conditional upon Works rather than upon Grace, the provision of “Work for All” is regarded as both a moral and practical imperative and no forms of discrimination can be countenanced. In this manner the new religion of universal equality has been established and imposed upon humanity as the supreme, allegedly irrefutable and un-challengeable basis of life and “civilization”. Of course any rigorous attempt to impose equality, with envy as its inherent malevolent inspiration, can only result in absolute tyranny. That is the precise goal which is intended and anyone who doubts it is a fool. This is the inevitable destiny of any who worship Mammon– which is the embodiment of so-called “scientific” Marxist materialism. The God of “”Equality” will destroy human civilization because it denies the very individual creativity and general abundance upon which it can be based and flourish.

Sincerely
Wallace Klinck

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ivfdcpB_fmg
www.socred.org
http://www.social-credit.blogspot.ca
http://www.socialcredit.com.au

https://www.amazon.com/Social-Credit-Philosophy-Oliver-Heydorn/dp/1530390923?ie=UTF8&*Version*=1&*entries*=0
https://www.amazon.com/Social-Credit-Economics-Oliver-Heydorn/dp/1493529765
https://www.amazon.com/Economics-Social-Credit-Catholic-Teaching/dp/1494946262/ref=pd_bxgy_14_img_2?ie=UTF8&refRID=N82A1EGWQ489F2A16J03

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_credit
Major C.H. Douglas on “Causes of War” – part 1 – YouTube
Major C.H. Douglas on ‘The Causes of War’ – part 2 – YouTube
http://social-credit.com/index.html


Screen Shot 2016-08-17 at 8.13.42 AM?

Dear Wallace,

Early in my Senate career I wrote that I got into politics to do something, not to be someone. That intention hasn’t changed in the ten years since.

Sometimes, in politics and life, there are things so important that they need to be defended under any circumstances. For lovers of freedom and jousters in the battle of ideas, one of those principles is freedom of speech.

Be under no illusion, that freedom is under assault like never before in this country.

It is not just the odious and subjective nature of section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act, but the group think that is infecting almost every part of our lives, where citizens are socially bludgeoned into conformity.

Many in the political class, aided and abetted by sections of the media, harangue and condemn anyone who doesn’t fall into line with their PC agenda. We are now expected to accept unquestioningly that there are dozens of self-declared gender identities, supporting traditional marriage means you are a ‘phobe’ and that Hillary Clinton is a trustworthy person to be US President.

Next time you go to a dinner party, see how you fare disagreeing with any of those statements. My bet is at best you’ll be met with uncomfortable silence. If you dare stick up for Donald Trump you’ll probably receive much worse!

Now, some might conclude that this is just the normal course of events with supposedly objectionable ideas subject to the court of public opinion. In normal circumstances that may be correct but things are different now.

The social justice warriors (SJWs) believe that the ends justify the means to stop others from even voicing opinions that don’t comply with their agenda.
Cartoonist Bill Leak produced an image that captured perfectly one of the issues facing many Aboriginal communities. He was condemned as a racist and the SJWs called for his sacking. Kudos to The Australian for refusing to bow to their pressure. I have no doubt that had the skin colour of the cartoon characters been white, there would have been no public outrage.

The message is very clear: don’t criticise Aboriginal communities or risk losing your job. The refusal to confront the truth may help explain why over $30 billion of taxpayer funds has been spent on these communities over the past ten years with little visible improvement in conditions.

We saw a similar thing with the Four Corners program about juveniles in detention in the NT. The ABC report was biased, incomplete and a perfect example of why we can no longer trust sections of our ABC with impartial and factual reporting. The release of a letter written by the journalist involved praising the NT minister responsible in order to gain access to the facility demonstrates how dubious we should be of such ‘exposés’.

I have experienced similar duplicity and cherry-picking of information to suit a pre-determined agenda by some of those linked to the same Four Corners report. Put simply, I cannot regard some of those individuals as credible and unbiased. They have a political world view which they are seeking to pursue through our publicly-funded broadcaster.

But it doesn’t end there. Section 18C of the RDA is now being used as a tool to stifle speech on the basis it may offend or insult someone – not necessarily the person complaining.

The students at a Queensland university excluded from a computer room on the basis of their skin colour are now subject to potential court action. Their crime was to mention the segregation they experienced on a Facebook page. As a result of these innocuous remarks, the complainant supposedly has been incapable of working for several years and wants $250,000 in compensation.
Amazingly, this disgraceful complaint is being considered for trial and these poor students are being subject to the most ghastly and expensive process because they offended someone with a different skin colour who discriminated against them on the basis of their skin colour! A perpetual circle of the grievance industry in action.

My Senate colleague David Leyonhjelm has complained to the Human Rights Commission about being called an ‘angry white man’ by a journalist, not because he is actually offended (although that isn’t a criteria under 18C) but to prove a point. I agree with him. If you simply changed the word white to black, brown or yellow the SJW would spring into a deafening chorus of complaint. Now, such is their silence, you can only hear the crickets chirping, because in their world, only white people can be racist.

I could go on.

We are now being subject to identity politics, pursued through publicly-funded institutions, that only seek to divide us and stifle our freedoms. It is a pervasive step toward Orwell’s totalitarian Newspeak, where words mean whatever the bureaucracy want them to mean.

So what can we do?

Fixing this problem begins with fixing Section 18C of the RDA. While some want to abolish it in its entirety, a good start would be to remove the words ‘offend’ and ‘insult’ from the act. This has even drawn strong support from across the political divide. In the last parliament a Bill to this effect (which I co-sponsored) was introduced but was never voted upon.

It’s time for that to change. In the first week back in parliament I’ll be reintroducing the same Bill with the expectation that this parliament will finally get a vote and expose very clearly who among your elected representatives is interested in protecting our freedoms and way of life. It will also indicate those who have been captured by and surrendered to Orwell’s frightening vision characterised in his book Nineteen Eighty-Four.
Until next week.
?
Cory Bernardi

PS. I will also be presenting a petition to the Senate encouraging reform of Section 18C. You can add your name HERE. Please encourage your friends and family to do the same.

You can also keep up with Cory Bernardi on Facebook.

Molyneux: What Pisses Me Off About Social Justice Warriors (video)

MolyneuxWarriors

Bolshevik/Zionist Hate Propaganda laws must be repealed RadicalPress.com Public Service Announcement

BolshevikHateLawsFinal

Arthur & the Jews The controversy over freedom of speech By Arthur Topham, Publisher & Editor RadicalPress.com

Arthur&TheJewsFINAL

Arthur & the Jews

The controversy over freedom of speech

By

Arthur Topham
Publisher & Editor
RadicalPress.com

October 23, 2015

“And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.”

~ Jesus Christ, John, Ch. 8, Verse 32

“For nothing is secret that shall not be made manifest; neither any thing hid, that shall not be known and come abroad.”

~ Jesus Christ, Ch. 8, Verse 17

“If this book has any sombre look, that is the native hue of the story it tells, not the reflection of my own cast of mind. I have written with feeling: the feeling of a contemporary, participant, eye-witness and of a journalist thwarted in his calling, which in my belief should serve truth without fear or favour, not special interests. I have seen more of the events of our century and of the secret perversions of national purposes than most, and have discovered through this experience that it was not all chance, but design. Therefore I have written a protest, but it is a protest against the suppression of truth, not against life.”

~ Douglas Reed, The Controversy of Zion (1956), Epilogue, P. 568

 

Two days from the time of this writing, on October 26th, 2015, a trial in B.C. Supreme Court involving the case of Regina v Roy Arthur Topham will commence in the small city of Quesnel, located in the central interior of the province of British Columbia in an area known as the Cariboo.

In essence this isn’t just the trial of Arthur Topham based upon a politically motivated and spurious Sec. 319(2) Criminal Code of Canada “Hate Propaganda” charge initiated by one of Canada’s largest Zionist Jew lobby organization, B’nai Brith Canada. It’s far more than that. What will be on trial from October 26th to November 6th is the legal entitlement of all Canadians to exercise their Constitutionally guaranteed right to freedom of expression, both on and off the Internet –  as written in Canada’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Sec. 2b which states that “Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms: (b) freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication“.

The outcome of the trial will determine whether or not Canada is, in fact, a truly open and free democracy or a nation whose sovereignty and freedom has been compromised by the wilful, premeditated actions of foreign lobbyists inimical to the country as a whole. In other words Freedom of Speech will be on trial.

The charge itself ought to be clearly understood by everyone concerned about their rights and freedoms as Canadians. Thus we see that the charge under Sec. 319(2) of the Criminal Code reads as follows:

Roy Arthur TOPHAM, between the 28th day of April, 2011 and the 4th day of May, 2012, inclusive, at or near Quesnel, in the Province of British Columbia, did by communicating statements, other than in private conversation, willfully promote hatred against an identifiable group, people of the Jewish religion or ethnic origin, contrary to Section 319(2) of the Criminal Code.

B.C. Supreme Court Justice Butler will preside and a jury of twelve men and women will make the final determination of guilty or not guilty.

EndHateCrimeLegislation 2 copy 2

Basically, to narrow it down to its core intent, I am being charged with willfully promoting hatred against people of the Jewish religion or ethnic origin based upon the multitude of articles and online books which I have published on my website prior to and since April 28th, 2011 when the complaint was officially laid against me by Canada’s most controversial serial complainant in the history of the human rights industry. Within a month of the first complaint being laid a second individual, an agent working for the League of Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada, also filed an identical charge.

Upon receiving the complaints, the head of the BC Hate Crime Team, former Det. Cst. Terry Wilson located in Surrey, B.C. along with his partner Cst. Normandie Levas, initiated an investigation into the allegations. What was unknown to me at the time was that all three of these individuals knew each other and had known each other in some cases for as long as fifteen years and all three of them were in the “business” of hunting down and attacking individuals and website owners who were being critical of the foreign Zionist state of Israel and/or its ideology known as Zionism.

In fact the two complainants in the Sec. 319(2) complaint were known to be friends and associates as far back as 2007 when one of the same complainants, a Zionist Jew working for B’nai Brith Canada first laid a similar complaint against my person and my website RadicalPress.com using the now repealed Canadian Human Rights Act legislation known as Sec. 13. In other words I have been attacked by this foreign Zionist lobby organization now for the past nine years and have been in a constant battle with them to retain my basic human rights.

The whole of Crown’s case rests upon the key terms “willfully” and “hatred”, which, in the case of the latter term “hatred”, any person of common sense will realize, is a word that, like its opposite, “love”, is imbued with multiple meanings, all of which are based upon subjective emotions of one type or another.

Now there are some serious problems that accompany an allegation which accuses a person of “hating” a whole “identifiable group” such as the “people of the Jewish religion or ethnic origin” based upon not only his own writings but also the written works of dozens of other writers, journalists, video producers, talk show hosts, artists, musicians and so on and these problems will undoubtedly come up during the course of the trial.

FREEXPRESSIONLOCKUP copy 3

Without going into too much further detail surrounding the spurious nature of the charge of promoting “hatred” toward all the Jews of the world (an accusation arising from comments made to me by former Det. Cst. Terry Wilson during the time I was incarcerated after my arrest on May 16th, 2012) I would rather focus on letting readers know a bit about who I really am and what my life has been all about since at least the year 1967 when I first became involved in what is now commonly referred to as “political activism” or “social activism”.

I was twenty years old and in my second year of university at Simon Fraser University in Burnaby, B.C. in 1967. For those who were too young to remember the Sixties or weren’t born yet, it was a period of history not that different from the world we’re now living in. Wars were rampant then as they are now. Protests and civil rights and civil liberties were still in their nascent stages of development relative to today’s scene but people were demanding their rights in the Sixties just as they still are today. Police brutality and corporate crime and political corruption were as widespread then as they are now and the mainstream media in 1967 was basically just as controlled by the Zionists as it is today. The only fundamental difference really was the sudden and unexpected appearance throughout Western society of what became known as the Hippie Movement. It was that previously unheard of phenomenon that attracted me and countless others and became the focus of my life; one which has never ceased or abated since I first became involved with it.

The watchwords of the Hippie Movement were “Love” and “Peace” and our collective efforts to manifest those two positive, life-enhancing moral qualities throughout the war-torn society of our day were what inspired millions of my generation to work toward a world where violence and war and terror and hatred would end forever to be replaced by the fundamental Christian values and precepts taught by Jesus Christ, values that included learning to love each other and respect each other as well as caring for the Earth Mother that sustained us all. These were my guiding principles throughout my life and remain so to this very day.

With that in mind the accusation of the Zionist lobbyists, when it comes to dealing with their own hatred of anything or anyone who doesn’t support their ideological objectives or the actions of the foreign state of Israel and its parallel objectives, that every critic of their political agenda “hates” all the Jews in the world is utterly preposterous and beyond all comprehension. Having fashioned the term “hatred” into a twisted, Talmudic talisman of loathing and contempt through generations of endless propaganda emanating from their own controlled media and then inserting the word into Canadian jurisprudence via legal subterfuge and political influence, they now feel that they have the judicial wherewithal to attack their perceived enemies and somehow stem the unstoppable tide of political and spiritual awareness that was birthed in the Sixties and then embellished beyond comprehension and control in Nineties with the advent of the World Wide Web.

The controversy surrounding the Jews throughout history has now reached the point of culmination. Their mission to stop the truth from being revealed. whenever it applies to their own culpable actions, by using the criminal court system to attack the truth revealers is doomed to end in failure just as their efforts to stop the Internet from exposing their heinous acts of terror and murder and destruction perpetrated upon the defenceless Semitic people of Palestine has proven to be unstoppable.

The Age of Orwellian Censorship is coming to an end and it behooves all people of all races, nationalities, ethnicities and colour including the Jews to recognize that no single group of people has the right or the power or the ability to stem the tide of evolutionary consciousness that’s now happening on this planet.

It’s for these basic reasons that I have fought against the Zionist efforts to control our basic human rights over the past nine years. Now we will see if the country is willing to protect its most precious of gift – the freedom to speak one’s mind and express one’s views on whatever issues they deem of value to sustain our God given right to live in peace and happiness without fear and war.

I pray that God will grant us the wisdom to choose freedom over censorship and love over hate.

•••0•••

Please help out with my upcoming Sec. 319(2) “Hate Propaganda” trial that commences in one week on October 26th by making a donation.

Donations can be made online via my GoGetFunding site located at http://gogetfunding.com/canadian-publisher-faces-jail-for-political-writings/ or else by sending cash, cheques or Money Orders to the following postal address.

Please make sure that any cheques or Money Orders are made out to – Arthur Topham – and sent to:

Arthur Topham
4633 Barkerville Highway
Quesnel, B.C.
V2J 6T8

 

An honest Israeli Jew tells the Real Truth about Israel – video by Miko Peled

RPEdNew300 copy

[Editor’s Note: Like a growing number of Israelis who’ve come to the realization that they, like we in the West, have been deceived by the government of the state of Israel into accepting the ongoing narrative that Israel is truly a democratic nation and that the problems related to the Palestinian people are simply the result of a failure on the part of the Arabs to negotiate honestly for some type of peaceful solution to the longstanding dispute that has torn the Middle East into warring factions since 1948, Miko Peled has given the world a  valuable gift of Truth in his presentation of the actual reality that exists in Palestine today and has existed since its inception in 1948.

Peled’s presentation and the thesis that he offers to the West is not new to those who’ve been following the Palestine/Israel conflict with an open mind and heart but it does illustrate beyond a shadow of a doubt that what we in the West have been trying to tell the world and in the process are accused of committing “Hate Crimes” and being “anti-Semites” for doing so, is all a part of this massive cover-up that’s been occurring worldwide since the at least 1947.

The arguments of the Zionist lobby here in Canada that people such as myself are fomenting “hatred” and “anti-Semitism” by publishing information that is in total agreement with what Miko Peled speaks about in this revealing video is but one further testimony as to the falsehood and deception that the Zionists have spread across and throughout Canada’s media and political landscape over the past 68 years of Israel’s deceptive existence.

I would ask readers to at some point take the time to view this important video and watch it with an open mind.]

•••0•••

Please help out with my upcoming Sec. 319(2) “Hate Propaganda” trial that commences in one week on October 26th by making a donation.

Donations can be made online via my GoGetFunding site located at http://gogetfunding.com/canadian-publisher-faces-jail-for-political-writings/ or else by sending cash, cheques or Money Orders to the following postal address.

Please make sure that any cheques or Money Orders are made out to – Arthur Topham – and sent to:

Arthur Topham
4633 Barkerville Highway
Quesnel, B.C.
V2J 6T8

 

Stephen Harper Hates Me

Screen Shot 2015-05-19 at 8.02.30 AM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JJjt3hZ0sxQ#t=63

Regina v Radical Press Legal Update # 23

NEWERESTLegalUpdateLogo-700

notice4RP

RPEdNew300 copy

Regina v Radical Press Legal Update #23

April 17th, 2015

Dear Free Speech Defenders and Radical Press Supporters,

The previous Legal Update #22 took place on September 30th, 2014 and six months have now transpired since I appeared in Quesnel’s Supreme Court.

The latest court appearance was originally set to be a pre-trial conference but it ended up being adjourned in order to give the defence an opportunity to serve constitutional notice on the Crown. Constitutional notice was served on March 23rd, 2015 and was dealt with by my new legal council Mr. Barclay Johnson from Victoria, B.C. who appeared via telephone to represent me while I and my wife Shastah appeared in the Quesnel courthouse. The judge appeared via telephone but I wasn’t able to determine where he was located but presumably on the lover mainland somewhere.

Crown counsel Jennifer Johnston spoke to the judge concerning the case, her position being that Crown wanted to put off the constitutional Charter applications until the end of the trial. In turn, defense counsel Barclay Johnson argued that he had been hired on a temporary retainer basis to put forward the Charter applications and at this time I lacked the resources to retain counsel for a trial and therefore putting off the argument until after the trial would make it impossible for me to properly put my constitutional challenge forward.

Crown then persisted in its position but the judge was more inclined to consider Barclay Johnson’s position and the discussion ended up unresolved as Crown’s time was limited due to another case that was awaiting address. As a result another date was set for April 28th, 2015 when Crown and the defence would once again connect via telephone at which time my counsel will once again address the timing of the constitutional argument.

As for Crown wanting to have my Charter arguments addressed after the trial this appeared to me to be rather like putting the cart before the horse as the whole intent of the Charter application is to challenge the validity of the charge in order to forestall the need for the case actually going to trial which will be a much more time consuming and expensive procedure.

One other thing arose at this time and that was the possibility that the Attorney General’s office may appoint a special prosecutor to take over from Crown counsel Johnston should the case proceed to trial as scheduled.

So we left the courthouse once again with more unresolved questions and further delays in what is now nearing the three year mark since this politically motivated “Hate” crime charge was first laid against me and RadicalPress.com.

I should have another update around the beginning of May.

 

Free Expression: Repeal Canada’s “Hate Propaganda” laws

FREEXPRESSIONLOCKUP CANHATELAWS

So-called “Hate Crimes” a Radical Press public service announcement

HateCrimesPosterFinal-800

The Jewish Tribe Unites Against the World’s Collective Outrage over Israel’s Genocide of Palestinians – Jerusalem Post

 

Mission Accomplished– ‘Wartime unity conceals political differences among American Jews’

 

Mark Glenn, Editor of The Ugly Truth website notes: –as we said here from the beginning, one of the objects in this entire exercise in ritualistic human sacrifice being perpetrated against the innocent people in Gaza was to rejoin the various divisions within the Jewish community worldwide, and in this respect, the honest observer watching all that is taking place can confidently say ‘Mission accomplished’.

RPEditor400

Dear Reader,

I want to draw your attention to the fact that B’nai Brith International and B’nai Brith Canada are on the top of the list of Jewish organizations who are 101% behind the genocide that is currently going on in GAZA-PALESTINE.

This is also the organization that’s responsible for filing the sec. 319(2) CCC “Hate Crime” complaint against me and RadicalPress.com that resulted in my arrest and theft of all of my computers and electronic files back on May 16th, 2012. I am currently facing trial by judge and jury in the British Columbia Supreme Court as a result of these machinations by Canada’s Jewish lobby.

What this tells me and should tell ALL Canadians is that these Jewish lobby groups are in fact subversive agents of International Zionism implanted in every sovereign nation in order to disrupt and subvert their judicial systems and create “Hate Propaganda” legislation that is then used to silence and penalize their critics.

How convenient indeed when it comes to Israel’s murderous, cold-blooded bombing of Palestinians that Canada should have federal legislation that equates criticism of such actions as being “anti-Semitic” and “hateful” and therefore indictable for anyone who stands up for Gaza and Peace. Canadians across the country are criticizing both Israel, the Jews and Israel’s political ideology which we know as ZIONISM. Will B’nai Brith Canada now be hunting down every website owner and blogger and journalist who has disagreed with Israel’s murderous policies and charging them with a sec. 319(2) “Hate Crime” offence? Such is the blasphemy of those who call themselves Jews and who, when it comes down to the crunch, stick together, as Lenny Bruce the Jewish comedian once said, like snot to a suede jacket whenever Israel comes under attack.

–––––

Jerusalem Post

Political differences among the main American Jewish denominations and organizations have been put on the back burner during Israel’s Gaza incursion, indicating the emergence of a rare consensus.

“There is across the board solidarity,” Malcolm Hoenlein, the executive vice chairman of the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations, told The Jerusalem Post on Wednesday.

Over the past several days, a number of US Jewish organizations, including a number of traditionally liberal and dovish groups, have issued statements of unqualified support for Israel’s invasion of the coastal territory.

Groups such as B’nai B’rith and the Anti-Defamation League have publicly endorsed Operation Protective Edge, while Rabbi William Gershon, the president of the Conservative movement’s Rabbinical Assembly, called for Hamas to be “isolated, removed from power and structurally dismantled.”

According to Hoenlein, whose organization lobbies the White House on behalf of a wide range of American Jewish interests, American Jews believe that the Israeli government has “acted with restraint and that the current situation is intolerable.”

Gershon and others have acknowledged the large number of Gazan civilians who have died in the fighting, but place the onus for their deaths squarely on Hamas, which operates out of civilian areas and has called on noncombatants to remain in their homes despite Israeli calls for the evacuation of conflict zones.

“I believe that for many American Jews, and actually there are polls suggesting Americans in general, what has become clear is that no matter what your political persuasion prior to this conflict is, that Israel faces an enemy that is sworn to its destruction,” Gershon said.

The current conflict, he continued, is not about West Bank settlements or a two-state solution, but about fighting an organization calling for the destruction of the Jewish state.

“We want to be a moral people, but you can’t be a moral people if you are dead. I think that this is the stark reality that the American Jewish community has come to understand,” he said.

When a country is under attack people tend to move to the Right, Prof. Steven Cohen of Hebrew Union College explained.

The Right tends to have a more critical attitude toward adversaries while the Left maintains a more charitable view, he said. “Obviously when the enemy is attacking Israel then people are going to adopt a more hostile view of the enemy, so in that respect the so-called movement to the Right is really a reflection of there being combat conditions.”

The real question, he continued, is what happens during the weeks and months after the cessation of hostilities.

“You think about the war in Lebanon or the Yom Kippur War where Jews were seemingly very hawkish and then they moved to a more dovish posture.

So we don’t know what is going to happen here,” Cohen said.

The current rightward shift comes as Israel is fighting what many Jews perceive as a more morally simple conflict than the Israeli-Palestinian situation as a whole and seems to be a temporary departure from the overall shift to the Left among younger American Jews.

According to the Pew Research Center, American Jews under the age of 30 are “less apt to say Israel is making sincere efforts at peacemaking as compared with Jews 30 and older.”

“Younger Jews who care about Israel who are not Orthodox tend to have more skeptical views of the Israeli government and of Israeli policy,” Cohen said.

Jonathan Sarna, the president of the Association for Jewish Studies, agreed, recalling that “historically, American Jews have united around Israel when it is under attack.

“That was true in 1967 and has been true to a greater or lesser extent ever since. At the moment, most Israelis are united behind the operation, so American Jews who take their cue from one or another Israeli position or newspaper are happy to unite as well,” he explained.

US support for the war, with 57 percent of Americans backing Israeli actions in Gaza, further emboldens Jews in their positions, and the relative lack of media coverage compared to previous rounds of violence, due mainly to events in Syria, Ukraine and elsewhere, has “makes it easier to unite behind Israel,” Sarna said.

Leonard Saxe, a researcher at Brandeis University, said there is anecdotal evidence that Birthright participants who have returned from Israel over the past several weeks “came away profoundly affected” and that their views have helped shape opinion on the Jewish street in the US.

Communal leaders who spoke with the Post largely agreed with such assessments.

“I believe that in times of existential threat – we have always come together. Because, in the end, that which divides us is so much less than that which unites us,” explained Rabbi Leonard A. Matanky of the Rabbinical Council of America.

One of the outliers in the American Jewish community is the left-wing J Street lobby, which pulled out of a community- wide pro-Israel rally in Boston several days ago.

In a letter to the Jewish Community Relations Council of Boston, which organized the rally and which counts J Street as a member, the lobby stated that it had pulled its sponsorship of the rally because the “roster of speakers did not include a pro-Israel, pro-peace perspective.”

“What was missing for us in this rally, and what ultimately precluded our co-sponsorship, was that despite our efforts, there was no space made to raise the issues that follow from our commitment to Israel’s Jewish and democratic future. There was no voice for our concerns about the loss of human life on both sides, or the acknowledgment of the conflict’s complexity and that the only way to truly end it is through a political solution,” J Street’s Shaina Wasserman wrote.

J Street’s decision to not participate was “shocking,” Barry Shrage, president of Boston’s Combined Jewish Philanthropies, told The Post. “We have a very big tent and want to include everybody who wants to be pro-Israel.”

According to Shrage, the issue of casualties on both sides was raised at the rally, but “issues like this that don’t have to do with the West Bank” or other political contretemps between Israel and the Palestinians.

Gershon also took issue with J Street’s decision, calling it “reprehensible” and saying it sent a message that would be “seized upon” by “Israel’s enemies.”

“There is a time to debate nuance and complexity and there is a time to come together to defend the right of Israel to exist,” he said. “In the middle of a war is not the time in my opinion to be exploring the complexities of the Arab-Israeli conflict.”

“I do want to be clear that our decision not to participate in the rally was not based on what statements the other participating organizations have or have not made about the current crisis, nor was it based on some implication that J Street is the only organization that sees the complexity of the conflict,” a spokeswoman for J Street told the Post.

“In solidarity with Israel during this difficult time, we have co-sponsored pro-Israel community-wide rallies in Philadelphia and San Diego. While we chose not to co-sponsor one rally in Boston, we sent representatives and mobilized support for the event, just as we have for events in many other communities nationwide,” J Street said.

A National Leadership Assembly, gathering hundreds of American Jewish leaders from across the country, is slated for Monday at the National Press Club in Washington.

The group, which will include representatives of the more than 50 member-organizations of the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations, the Jewish Federations and others, will gather at the National Press Club “to show support across the board of the Jewish community and the bipartisan support for Israel in Washington,” Hoenlein announced.

Criminalizing Criticism of Israel in Canada by Micheal Keefer, Global Research

Screen Shot 2014-04-04 at 11.40.34 PM 

http://www.globalresearch.ca/criminalizing-criticism-of-israel-in-canada/5376306

TrojanHorse2

Criminalizing Criticism of Israel in Canada

Bill C-13, A “Digital Trojan Horse for the Surveillance State”

By Michael Keefer

Global Research, April 02, 2014

Region: Canada

oh-noahide-canada-e1362595205454

The international campaign calling for boycott, divestment, and sanctions (BDS) against Israel, as a peaceful means of persuading that state to abandon its systematic violations of international law and its policies of apartheid dispossession, colonization, and blockade in the occupied Palestinian territories, has recently enjoyed a burgeoning number of successes.1

In early February 2014, The Economist noted that BDS “is turning mainstream,”2 and former Israeli Knesset Speaker Avraham Burg wrote in Haaretz that the “BDS movement is gaining momentum and is approaching the turning point […. at which] sanctions against Israel will become a fait accompli.”3

BiBi-2

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu made a point of indicating that he and his allies would respond vigorously to this trend. Some of the reports about a cabinet meeting where “tactics” were discussed revealed more about internecine divisions than about the substance of the meeting: “Netanyahu convenes strategy meeting to fight boycotts”—but he deliberately excluded some senior ministers:

“Left Ministers Kept Out of Secret Cabinet BDS Session.”4

Yet although Israeli media indicated “that ‘the discussion was held in secret’, with an imposed ‘media blackout’,” one source that reported this fact was able to give a fairly precise sense of what went on behind closed doors:

Ideas apparently discussed by senior ministers included lawsuits “in European and North American courts against [pro-BDS] organizations” and “legal action against financial institutions that boycott settlements … [and complicit] Israeli companies”. There is also the possibility of “encouraging anti-boycott legislation in friendly capitals around the world, such as Washington, Ottawa and Canberra”, and “activat[ing] the pro-Israel lobby in the U.S.” for such a purpose.5

This kind of “lawfare,” as it is sometimes called, is nothing new (nor, one can add, is the notion, also discussed at this meeting, of bolstering surveillance of pro-BDS organizations by military intelligence, the Shin Bet Security Service, and the Mossad). It’s also evident that the pro-Israel lobby has been active in mobilizing politicians in the “friendly capitals” of Washington, Ottawa, and Canberra for many years.

Recent fruits of that labour have included, in Canberra, threats made in June 2013 by Julie Bishop, a senior member of Julia Gillard’s incoming Australian government, that “supporters of an academic boycott of Israel” would have their “access to public research funds summarily cut off.”6 In Washington, a bipartisan “Protect Academic Freedom Act” that would deny federal funding “to colleges and universities that participate in a boycott of Israeli academic institutions or scholars”7 has been brought before Congress.

But what of Canada, whose Prime Minister is Mr. Netanyahu’s most faithful friend?8

This essay will argue that revisions to the Canadian Criminal Code proposed by the Harper government contain wording that is designed to enable lawfare prosecutions of human rights activists in precisely the manner desired by Mr. Netanyahu and his associates.

1. Bill C-13 and its deceptions

Bill C-13, the Protecting Canadians from Online Crime Act, received first reading in the House of Commons in November 2013. In a web page devoted to “Myths and Facts” about this bill, the Department of Justice rejects the “myth” that “Bill C-13 is an omnibus crime bill that deals with more than cyberbullying.”

Bill C-13 is not an omnibus crime bill. It combines a proposed new offence of non-consensual distribution of intimate images to address cyberbullying with judicially-authorized tools to help police and prosecutors investigate not only the proposed new offence, but other existing offences that are committed via the Internet or that involve electronic evidence. [….] The Bill does not contain the former Bill C-30?s controversial amendments relating to warrantless access to subscriber information and telecommunication infrastructure modification.9

However, Dr. Michael Geist, the Canada Research Chair of Internet and E-commerce Law at the University of Ottawa, has observed that Bill C-13 does indeed retain provisions that permit an increased warrantless access to personal information, far beyond what is envisioned by the current Criminal Code.10 Criminal lawyer Michael Spratt has denounced the bill as a “digital Trojan horse for the surveillance state”:

most of C-13 has little to do with protecting victims [of cyber-bullying]. This bill would recklessly expand the surveillance powers of the state. It sacrifices personal privacy. It limits or eliminates judicial oversight. It is inconsistent with recent Supreme Court jurisprudence. It’s a dangerous bill.11

The Department of Justice’s claim that “Bill C-13 is not an omnibus crime bill” is transparently false. As another critic, Terry Wilson, has remarked, despite being promoted “as legislation to prevent online bullying, the bill actually has very little to do with bullies and has sections ranging from stealing cable, hacking, surveillance, to terrorism (cyberbullying accounts for 2 out of the 50 pages in the bill) […]. The bill even includes ‘hate legislation’….”12

In this latter respect Bill C-13 incorporates, once again, a Trojan horse. The bill adds wording to the Hate Propaganda sections of the Criminal Code that seems, on the face of it, to do no more than to bring these sections into conformity with other parallel texts—with several important documents of international law, and with a sentencing provision later in the Criminal Code where the same wording already appears. But a second intention is also arguably at work in this part of Bill C-13, for there is good reason to believe that the new wording is intended, while deceptively avoiding any public debate over the matter, to make it possible to prosecute human rights discourse and advocacy relating to the oppressive treatment of Palestinians by the state of Israel as hate speech or incitement of hatred.

This view of the intention underlying Bill C-13 is supported by Prime Minister Harper’s speech to the Israeli Knesset on January 20, 2014 (which will be discussed below). It can draw support as well from the fact that an identical change to the wording of the French penal code made in 2003 by the so-called Lellouche Law has permitted the conviction of some twenty French human rights activists for incitement of racial hatred.13

The results in France have been paradoxical. France is, like Canada, a High Contracting Party of the Fourth Geneva Convention of 1949—whose first article states that “The High Contracting Parties undertake to respect and to ensure respect for the present Convention in all circumstances.”14 The people convicted for incitement of racial hatred under the Lellouche Law are participants in a movement that has been consistent in its firm rejection of antisemitism and all other forms of racism.15 This movement advocates a peaceful exertion of economic pressure with the aim of persuading the Israeli state to end its multiple and systematic violations of international law, including in particular the Fourth Geneva Convention, which Israel has been repeatedly been condemned for flouting by UN committees and reports, as well as by independent agencies such as Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International. The facts of the matter are thus unambiguous: in enforcing the Lellouche Law, and redefining human rights activists as people guilty of hate crimes, the French state has simultaneously been violating its prior solemn commitment “to respect and to ensure respect for” the Fourth Geneva Convention “in all circumstances.”

One of the aims of Bill C-13 appears to be to place Canada in a similar situation of openly violating one of the central instruments of international law.

2. Alterations to the meaning of Sections 318 and 319 of the Criminal Code

Section 12 of Bill C-13 proposes several small additions within that part of the Criminal Code (Sections 318-321.1) that carries the subtitle “Hate Propaganda.” Section 12 reads as follows:

12. Subsection 318.(4) of the Act is replaced by the following:

(4) In this section, “identifiable group” means any section of the public distinguished by colour, race, religion, national or ethnic origin, age, sex, sexual orientation, or mental and physical disability.16

(The emphasis here indicates the wording being added to the current Criminal Code by Bill B-13.)

These proposed additions within Section 318 of the Criminal Code, which is concerned with the crime of “Advocating genocide,” also have an impact on the meaning and application of Section 319, which is concerned with the crimes of “Public incitement of hatred” and “Wilful promotion of hatred,” and in which—as Subsection 319.(7) states—“’identifiable group’ has the same meaning as in section 318”. The relevant clauses in Section 319 read as follows:

319. (1) Every one who, by communicating statements in any public place, incites hatred against any identifiable group where such incitement is likely to lead to a breach of the peace is guilty of

(a) an indictable offence and is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years; or

(b) an offence punishable on summary conviction.

(2) Every one who, by communicating statements, other than in private conversation, wilfully promotes hatred against any identifiable group is guilty of

(a) an indictable offence and is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years; or

(b) an offence punishable on summary conviction.17

BIG-Image

The most noteworthy addition to the concept of “identifiable group” is that of the category of national origin, which has no evident connection to the ostensible purpose of Bill C-13, but may be understood as linked to another agenda that was forcefully enunciated by Prime Minister Stephen Harper in his January 20, 2014 speech to the Israeli Knesset—namely, that of re-defining criticism of the policies and behaviour of the nation-state of Israel in relation to its Palestinian citizens and to the inhabitants of the Occupied Palestinian Territories as hate propaganda.

As a February 2014 report in the leading Israeli newspaper Haaretz indicated, the hate-crime convictions in France several months previously of twelve human rights activists, supporters of the international campaign advocating boycott, divestment and sanctions (BDS) against Israel, were secured under the Lellouche Law, which “extended the definition of discrimination beyond the expected parameters of race, religion and sexual orientation to include members of national groups.”18

3. The Lellouche Law: another Trojan horse?

Whether intentionally or not, the Lellouche Law has functioned as a kind of Trojan horse. Dr. Jean-Yves Camus has remarked that this law, “passed on 3 February 2003, in the wake of an unprecedented wave of anti-Semitic violence, allows judges to impose harsher sanctions upon perpetrators of racist violence, than those they would normally receive in the case of a similar act of violence not motivated by racism.”19 As the Haaretz report on the criminalization of BDS activism in France indicates, the law’s ostensible purpose, at a time when the openly antisemitic, anti-immigrant and neofascist Front National of Jean-Marie LePen had been attracting increased support, in southern France especially, was “to strengthen French republican values and counter sectarian tendencies”:

The law was passed in 2003, shortly after unprecedented gains by the far right National Front party in the presidential election.

The measure was designed to respond to a social climate of not only mounting anti-Semitism, but also anti-Arab discrimination and xenophobia.20

The “Outline of motives” that prefaced the Lellouche Law when it was presented to the Assemblée Nationale in November 2002 was explicit in its repeated statements that the additions to the Penal Code proposed by this law were primarily intended to target openly racist violence:

“violences ouvertement racistes,” “actes de violence intentionellement racistes,” “violences à caractère raciste,” “agressions à caractère raciste.”21

Although this text specified that racist violence could be “moral” as well as physical,22 the two recent examples it offered to the deputies of the Assemblée Nationale were the “openly racist murder” of a young Frenchman of Moroccan origin in northern France in October 2002, and racist aggression directed against young students of a private Jewish school in the 13th arrondissement of Paris in early November.23 Noting that existing French laws already targeted racial discrimination, the incitement of hatred or violence, and Holocaust revisionism, the prefatory outline defined the purpose of this law as being to significantly enhance the penalties imposed in cases where attacks on people or property are racist in character—as when racism is involved in acts of torture and barbarism, violence resulting unintentionally in death, and acts leading to mutilation or permanent disability, as well as acts involving damage to or the destruction of property.24

Despite this explicit statement of intention, the Lellouche Law has been applied in another manner altogether—on the pretext that in eight of its nine articles it includes the category of “nation” in the definition of groups that can be understood as victimized. As the Haaretz report indicates, this law “has been invoked repeatedly against anti-Israel activists. France has seen 10 trials against BDS supporters based on Lellouche.”25

Pascal Markowitz, head of the BDS legal task force of the Conseil Représentatif des Institutions Juives de France (CRIF), is frank in his assessment of the Lellouche Law’s instrumental value. He is quoted by Haaretz as saying that “the law is ‘the most effective legislation on BDS today.’ ‘We had only one acquittal, so the statistics are looking good,’ he said.”26 But other political figures in France have taken a different view of the matter:

“These convictions are unconscionable,” Nicole Kiil-Nielsen, a French member of the European Parliament, said at a special session on the case in Strasbourg in 2011. “Governments are doing nothing to end Israel’s illegal occupation [of the Palestinian territories] and the French court is wrongfully denying citizens from acting through BDS.”27

trojanhorse

It’s important to understand what is meant, in the present context, by a “Trojan horse.” In every version of the ancient story, from Homer to Virgil,28 the essential point is the same. The hollow wooden horse was a duplicitous stratagem used by the Greek army that had for ten years been besieging Troy; it succeeded because the horse was deceptively dual-purpose in nature. Pretending to abandon their siege, the Greeks left this huge artefact behind: its plausible overt function was as an offering to the gods, which the Trojans were persuaded to drag into their city in celebration of their supposed victory. But it also had a second concealed function—as a treacherous means of getting a body of armed Greeks inside the walls of Troy, so that they could open the city gates at night when the rest of their army returned.

The Lellouche Law has served as a Trojan horse because when it was passed it seemed an appropriate and plausible means of dealing with an increase in racially motivated violence in France that coincided with an upsurge in support for a frankly racist far-right political party. But the law has since been used for a quite different purpose: that of criminalizing the discourse of human rights activists who speak out in support of respecting and ensuring respect for international humanitarian law.

4. The insertion of “national” into Sections 318 and 319: just “housecleaning”?

According to a report by Paul McLeod of the Halifax Chronicle-Herald, the addition of the word “national” to Sections 318 and 319 of the Criminal Code is explained by the Department of Justice as being “designed to match the wording of a protocol from the Council of Europe, a human rights organization.”29 The reference is to the Additional Protocol to the Convention on Cybercrime, concerning the criminalisation of acts of a racist and xenophobic nature committed through computer systems, adopted in Strasbourg in January 2003. In Chapter I, Article 2.1 of this text the word “national” occurs in a definition of the groups understood to be victimized by “racist and xenophobic material.”30

McLeod indicates that some legal experts have proposed that the change is “likely a mere housecleaning amendment to bring the Criminal Code in line with the wording of other statutes.”31 The word “national” does indeed occur in similar contexts in the UN International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Article 20, and in Article 2 of the UN Convention on Genocide. Moreover, Bill C-13 brings Sections 318 and 319 of the Criminal Code into conformity with the sentencing provision in Section 718, which already includes all the groups (national origin, age, sex, and mental and physical disability) that were not included in Section 318.(4) but have now been added.

A “housecleaning” explanation of the changes is thus entirely plausible.

However, the housecleaning has not actually been very thorough. In its current form, Section 318 of the Criminal Code, which defines the appropriate punishment for the crime of advocating or promoting genocide, is a somewhat peculiar text—for its subsection 2, while clearly derived from Article 2 of the UN Convention on Genocide, omits clauses (b), (d), and (e) of that article’s definition.32

David MacDonald and Graham Hudson have remarked that when Parliament ratified the Convention on Genocide in 1952, it excluded some of the clauses of Article 2 from Canada’s Criminal Code, on the grounds that matters such as the forcible removal of children are not relevant to this country. (Given the existence of Canada’s system of church-run residential schools, into whose custody native children were forcibly transferred, it seems obvious that the last clause of the Convention’s Article 2 was excluded in bad faith.) MacDonald and Hudson note as well that when in 2000 Parliament adopted the Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes Act, it thereby made the 1998 Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (which includes the Convention on Genocide’s full definition of genocide) a part of Canadian statutory law.33 Section 318 of the Criminal Code is thus anomalous in its current form, in that its definition of the crime of genocide excludes clauses which are nonetheless part of Canadian statutory law because of their incorporation into the Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes Act.

In a thorough housecleaning of this part of the Criminal Code, the inclusion of the three omitted clauses from Article 2 of the Convention on Genocide would have been an obvious step to take.

I mention this not because it tells with any force against a “housecleaning” explanation of Bill C-13’s insertion of the word “national” into Sections 318 and 319 of the Criminal Code: as noted above, that explanation remains wholly plausible. But what this example does suggest is that the framers of Bill C-13 may not have been single-mindedly focused on housecleaning.

harper-netanyahu

Prime Minister Harper’s January 20, 2014 address to the Israeli Knesset leads us toward a second explanation of the purpose of Bill C-13?s insertion of the word “national” into the definition of groups that can be victimized by hate propaganda. In suggesting that this speech reveals with some clarity the thinking that underlies this addition to the text of the Criminal Code, I do not mean to imply that the primary and overt explanation of the change as a “housecleaning” matter is displaced by this second underlying intention—for that is not how Trojan horses work.

A Trojan horse is by its nature duplicitous, but that duplicity can only be successful to the degree that the horse’s overt and primary purpose remains plausible.

[Read more…]

Support the Radical Press Legal Defense Fund

CensorshipPoster600 copy

Bad Moon Rising: How the Jewish Lobbies Created Canada’s “Hate Propaganda” Laws by Arthur Topham

BadMoonRisingHeader 800 copy 4

 

Bad Moon Rising: 

How the Jewish Lobbies Created Canada’s “Hate Propaganda” Laws

By 

Arthur Topham

“Therefore whosoever heareth these sayings of mine, and doeth them,
I will liken him unto a wise man, which built his house upon a rock:
And the rain descended, and the floods came, and the winds blew, and
beat upon that house; and it fell not: for it was founded upon a rock.
And everyone that heareth these sayings of mine, and doeth them not,
Shall be likened unto a foolish man, which built his house upon the sand:
And the rain descended, and the floods came, and the winds blew, and
Beat upon that house; and it fell: and great was the fall of it.”
~ Jesus Christ, St. Matthew Ch. 7, vs 24 -27

 

My assertion, as stated in the title to this article, that Canada’s judicial system has been infiltrated and co-opted by foreign Zionist Jew lobby groups operating in Canada since 1919, will automatically be met with a loud hue and cry of “preposterous! outrageous!” followed immediately by much hand-wringing and declamations of “anti-Semitism”,”hate”,”racism” and further punctuated, dramatized and broadcast across the nation via the the Zionist-controlled mainstream media.

So be it. It doesn’t detract one iota from the facts. All such reactionary responses only reinforce the premise of my argument that Canada’s Zionist Jew media cartel is, and always has been, an integral part of their overall plan to formulate and establish Orwellian laws inimical to the rights and freedoms of the people. Frankly stated it’s the modus operandi of these foreign-controlled Jewish lobbies to react precisely in this fashion for that is how they mendaciously twist and stifle debate on any issue of national importance to Canadians; be it our Charter rights or our fundamental right (and responsibility as patriotic protectors of our country) to question the direction of the nation’s foreign policies which, under the current Harper regime, are deliberately replacing the nation’s longstanding principles of common sense and aligning our once relatively respected political ideals with the present agenda of the Zionist Jewish state of Israel, considered by most intelligent people to be the most rogue, racist, supremacist, violent, atheistic and apartheid nation on the face of the planet.

It’s my fervent contention that the template for Canada’s “Hate Propaganda” legislation was, from the start, designed in such a way as to function as a legal shield; a mechanism which the Zionist lobbyists use to defend themselves against any allegations aimed at exposing their covert actions; all of which are meant to benefit their inordinate influence over Canadian politics and the criminal actions of the foreign state of Israel; Harper, of course, being their current Trojan Horse, front man in this deliberate, ongoing, slow motion coup to capture the nation’s political and legal systems.

When we go back in history and retrace the steps that these legal interlopers have taken since the end of World War 2 it’s clearly evident what they’ve been up to, especially in light of the now increasing displeasure that more and more Canadians are showing toward the actions of the Jewish lobbies when it comes to their relentless, telling attacks upon our Charter of Rights and Freedoms which include our fundamental right to freedom of expression as stated in Sec. 2b of the Charter.

For those still unfamiliar with this fundamental right it states:

2. Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms:

(b) freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication.

All that’s required in order to verify this war against our rights and freedoms, including our most basic right of speaking out and expressing our views on issues vital to our national well being, is to delve into any and all of the legal cases over the past forty four years associated with the issue of freedom of expression and one will see immediately that in practically every instance the first special interest lobby group lining up and vying for intervenor status is inevitably a Jewish one. And furthermore, concomitant with their zealousness to intervene is usually the underlying fact that it is they themselves who were instrumental in bringing forth the charges. And if that isn’t the norm then they’re undoubtedly there to make sure that the complainant (usually an agent in one form or another) gets the maximum support of their power and influence in the courts and the media.

The foundation for all of this pretense and deceit was laid at the end of the last world war when the Zionist-controlled U.K. and USA began cranking up their deliberately orchestrated accusations that Hitler and the German military were guilty of having attempted to wipe out the Jews in Europe by gassing millions of them and then cremating the innocent souls in ovens to cover up their horrendously heinous crime. The Nuremberg Trials at the war’s end were the focus of these fantastic claims of willful genocide by gas and fire and the West, still mesmerized by the massive amounts of anti-German hate propaganda which they had been saturated with for the past six years, as well as being shell-shocked from all the fighting, killing, bombing and destruction, fell prey to this massive deception and was unwilling or unable to garner the moral fortitude or financial resources necessary to counter these outrageous lies of the powerful Zionist lobby.

Little did it matter that every confession by the captured German military commanders had been gained by torture. Little did it matter that the majority of those running the trials were of Jewish ethnicity. Little did it matter that laws which had been followed by nations for decades were suddenly revised in secrecy just prior to the war’s end and the former International Geneva protocols cast aside and new standards of jurisprudence abruptly introduced into the equation by Jewish judges and the Zionist forces who had gained firm control of the whole charade. This was the hour that they’d planned for and were awaiting since first declaring war on Germany in 1933 when Hitler and the National Socialist Party gained power through legal, democratic means.

Now that the Allies had gained their victory, the Zionists via subterfuge, deception, political pressure and the willing assistance of their controlled media and Hollywood, were finally in a position to have their long sought “6 Million Jewish Holocaust” footings poured, thus assuring themselves of a firm propaganda foundation for the erection of their fabricated phantasy; one that would then allowing for the rest of the subsequent monkey business of taking over and manipulating national and international laws, all of which was based upon their cunningly crafted pretext for tyranny known as the “Holocaust”.

After that landmark lie was accomplished it was merely a matter of time, patient plodding, and endless, inordinate propaganda and pressure placed upon the rest of the population of the world who had still to accept the “Holocaust” hoax and be subsequently convinced of the dire and urgent necessity for enacting legislation that would make it illegal to promote either “genocide” or “hatred” toward any identifiable group.

In principle (and of course based upon the lie of the “6 Million”) these proposals might have appeared laudable and worthy had the mythical “Holocaust” actually occurred and in that context they would most definitely have been noble pursuits to accomplish but that, unfortunately, wasn’t the reality. Only now that the real history of the last eighty years is finally coming to light, thanks to the free and open Internet, are we finally getting to see the original, unadulterated script as it was so cleverly designed by the Zionist forces of the day; a program of diabolic, Machiavellian political pragmatism designed to destroy democratic institutions and replace them with a Zionist-based illuminist, occult vision of a macabre New World Order where they, and only they, would hold all the power and control over the world’s people along with all the resources of the planet.

Such was the set and setting here in Canada when the Jewish lobbies started their underhanded campaign to create “Hate Propaganda” laws that would be and are being used against Canadian citizens today.

One might legitimately say that these deceptive measures to control freedom of speech actually began even before the commencement of WW2. After Hitler and the National Socialist Party came to power in 1933 the Jews in Canada were already growing fearful that Canadians might begin to believe what Germany was saying about the International financiers and the Jewish control of their own beleaguered nation and so in the province of Manitoba, (of all places) the government passed a statute to combat what was apparently perceived to be a “rise in the dissemination of Nazi propaganda”. The premise of which (The Libel Act, R.S.M. 1913, c. 113, s. 13A (added S.M. 1934, c. 23, s. 1) was later to become The Defamation Act, R.S.M. 1987, c. D20, s. 19(1) and was in all likelihood the first volley launched against freedom of expression.

Up until 1970 Section 181 of the Criminal Code, which reads: “Every one who wilfully publishes a statement, tale or news that he knows is false and that causes or is likely to cause injury or mischief to a public interest is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years.” was the only provision in the Code even remotely connected to the offence of group defamation but it didn’t, at the time, specifically make mention of “hate propaganda”.

As stated above, when WW2 ended the work of the Zionist lobbyists began in earnest when their “Holocaust” card began appearing as the foundational pretext to any and all discussions surrounding “human rights” and “discrimination”. The first step in the direction of censorship was the United Nations’ Universal Declaration of Human Rights in 1948 with its references to “hate propaganda” and by 1953 we find that the Canadian Jewish Congress was already diligently pursuing efforts toward this end with their attempt to insert anti-hate propaganda provisions into the Criminal Code which was being revised in that same year.

Their deceptive labours eventually bore fruit when the lobby was finally able to convince Canada’s federal Justice Minister Guy Favreau in 1965 to appoint a special (interest) committee to look into the purported “problems” connected with the dissemination of “hate propaganda” in Canada.

Surprisingly (not) what became known as “The Special Committee on Hate Propaganda in Canada” and later abbreviated (for propaganda purposes) to the “Cohen Committee” was headed by a Jewish lawyer, Dean Maxwell Cohen, Q.C., Dean of the Faculty of Law, McGill University. While not all members of the committee were Jewish there was one other notable lawyer instrumental in aiding the Jewish lobby in their relentless quest for censorship laws. This was none other than Professor Pierre E. Trudeau, Associate Professor of Law, University of Montreal, soon to become Canada’s Prime Minister.

The committee studied the alleged “problem” from January 29th to November 10th, 1965 and their conclusions called for new legislation that ultimately affected the Post Office Act, the Customs Act, and most critically in today’s context, what is now Section 319 of the Criminal Code, the very same section that’s being used to shut down RadicalPress.com and threaten its Publisher and Editor (me) with a possible two year jail sentence for having expressed opinions and facts on Zionism, Jews and the state of Israel.

My case is designed to be the test case for the Jewish lobbyists working in Canada. Should they win and find me guilty under Sec. 319(2) of the Criminal Code of Canada then that precedent will undoubtedly unleash a flood of subsequent attacks upon the rest of the bloggers and publishers and writers and artists living in Canada who also see an imminent threat to their freedom of expression encapsulated in this draconian, Marxist legislation designed with malicious forethought to censor truth and stymie any and all attempts to achieve and maintain justice and freedom of speech in Canada.

Conclusion:

Just as the great parable of Jesus Christ regarding the foolish man who built his house upon the sand has come down through history so too has the foolish attempt by those who call themselves Jews to build an occult house of invisible governance upon the sands of deception, usury and an insatiable lust for power and control over their fellow mortals.

Now that the rains of the peoples’ outrageous indignation and the floods of perceived injustice and repression of personal freedoms and the winds of Truth and Freedom are beginning to beat with greater and greater intensity upon the once mighty and powerful House of Zion (thanks to the miracle of the Internet), the underpinnings of this deceptive, age-old hoax are giving way and, should the people continue to unite and persevere in their staunch resistance to and abolition of all the “Hate Propaganda” laws now being used against them then soon, and with great relief and thankfulness, will come the fall of this House of Horrors and a new beginning for those who want only peace and love and justice and brotherhood to reign supreme.

—-