A Reply and Challenge to Ben Gadd By Monika Schaefer

A Reply and Challenge to Ben Gadd

By Monika Schaefer

Sunday, January 8th, 2017

Back in December, Ben Gadd responded to the shock expressed by a mutual friend about my expulsion from the Jasper Environmental Associaton (JEA). A small sample from Ben:

yegaddz

Holocaust denial is a federal offense in Canada, a serious crime. It’s hate speech, not free speech. That’s because it’s a particularly virulent lie promulgated by anti-Semites. And anti-Semitism, as we all know, has resulted in the hate-sparked deaths of millions of people over many hundreds of years. Hate crimes of all sorts occur in Canada, and they are not tolerated, especially this one. Nor is the public expression of the hateful beliefs that fuel such crimes…

The following letter by Rocky Notnes seemed like a natural and logical reaction to a situation by a person who apparently is not affected by all the control words which are meant to elicit a certain programmed response. He penned this letter after learning that I had been expelled from the JEA.

December 17, 2016

Dear JEA members

This is Rocky Notnes from the Entrance ranch near Hinton. Some of you will know me through the Alberta Environmental Network over the past 30 or so years.

Some, if not all of you probably also know that I wrote a letter to the Jasper newspapers, which was published in both, defending Monika Schaefer’s right to free speech re the holocaust. So my stand will not be news to you.

When I learned that she was expelled from JEA for her views as well as almost everything else I was quite surprised and disappointed. It seems like JEA have jumped on the anti-Monika bandwagon with most of the people in Jasper in what seems to have become a stampede. It is as if people are trying to distance themselves as if they think they are guilty by virtue of just knowing her.

I have known Monika before and after and I do not see her having changed, other than speaking out on an issue that obviously is taboo! While I am not a “holocaust denier” as it is called now, I find your, and others in Jasper, reaction appalling. It seems to me that if members of the JEA felt so strongly about it they could have issued a statement that they do not support Monika in her views. That’s all.  But this is democracy “in reaction”, not “action”!

I feel the same way about Elizabeth May and the Green Party,,, they could have issued a statement disassociating themselves from her views. But to boot somebody out for expressing a view, regardless of the topic, when she has been an upstanding member of the community all her life is, going over the top, in my view.

 

Regards, Rocky Notnes


The following day this rather patronizing diatribe came from Ben Gadd:

Thanks for writing to all of us, Rocky. I didn’t think I’d ever disagree with you about anything, but in Monika’s case I have to. Hers is not a free-speech issue. Here’s why.

Holocaust denial is a federal offense in Canada, a serious crime. It’s hate speech, not free speech. That’s because it’s a particularly virulent lie promulgated by anti-Semites. And anti-Semitism, as we all know, has resulted in the hate-sparked deaths of millions of people over many hundreds of years. Hate crimes of all sorts occur in Canada, and they are not tolerated, especially this one. Nor is the public expression of the hateful beliefs that fuel such crimes.

If Monika had kept her views to herself, as many anti-Semites do, none of this would have come up. But she hasn’t. In 2013, out of the blue, she sent me a “truther” video blaming the 9/11 attacks on the “Zionists,” i.e. the Jews.

Like other fake news on the Internet, this is a complete fabrication. Go to http://www.debunking911.com for a detailed analysis.

Monika approached other JEA members, too. We didn’t push her away at that point. Some of us took the time to reason with her and direct her to factual sources. I told her that such conspiracy theories are hazardous. They inevitably lead to hatred of whoever is accused of directing the conspiracy. I thought that Monika — the Monika we used to know and love — would realize the depth and danger of the rabbit hole she was going down and quickly reverse her direction.

But she rejected such advice and kept going, deeper and deeper, until now she seems to have reached the bottom, a scary place shared by the likes of Ernst Zündel and James Keegstra (and, alas, Monika’s own brother Alfred). At that point I pushed her away. As has the JEA.

The JEA is a group of like-minded, high-minded folks. We don’t hate anyone. We don’t hate Monika. Rather, our group works together to watch over Jasper National Park and alert the world to activities we see as harmful to this place we love. For that job the organization needs the public on side. And they are. As the polls show, Canadians believe what environmental groups such as the JEA have to say about the value of the park and how it needs to be protected, while Canadians do not buy the commercially-tainted stuff that park exploiters try to sell everyone in their self-promotional ad campaigns. Given the facts, which is what the JEA provides, it’s easy for people to tell the difference between the JEA’s clear and honest position of integrity and some corporation’s clever attempt to get what it wants.

So maintaining our integrity is crucial to the JEA. Opening our membership to vocal haters of any sort, who have accepted obvious lies and seek to spread them, would seriously damage that integrity.

Not only that, any society incorporated in Alberta must exist for a “benevolent, philanthropic, charitable, provident, scientific, artistic, literary, social, educational, agricultural, sporting or other useful purpose” [Societies Act, section 3(1)]. It goes without saying that (a) members should be in agreement with this statement and the goals of the society, (b) that spreading hatred is not included in the statement or in the JEA’s goals, and (c) that anyone doing so cannot be a member.

Monika can go on and on about how she’s the one with integrity, how she’s the victim and those organizations that have rejected her are the haters, but these are just tactics. They are used all the time by people held to account for bad behavior.

A good definition of integrity is “the quality of being honest and having strong moral principles; moral uprightness.” (Just Google the word.) A person of integrity doesn’t try to convince others that dark-skinned people, for example (substitute indigenous people or Muslims or Jews, etc.) are evil and/or subhuman and should be discriminated against. Such beliefs are in themselves evil, because they are lies. These are not honest beliefs. These are falsehoods so easily exposed that they can be accepted only by the willing suspension of disbelief. You have to want to believe them, despite all the evidence. And there goes your integrity.

Worse, hateful beliefs provide excuses to hurt people. Bigoted mistreatment of minorities occurs all the time, even in Canada, and I’m sure that you, as I, abhor it. Anyone engaged in it is not acting with integrity.

And here’s what really hurts me. I think that Monika — pleasant, friendly Monika, the likeable Jasper violinist — is being used by her new anti-Semitic associates to give Holocaust denial a fresh face. They are turning her into something she’s basically not.

I hope that she awakens one morning to the truth about this (the real truth, not the “truther” truth) and disavows both the intellectual poison she has been fed and the whole crowd purveying it. I hope this occurs soon, before it brings her further mental and emotional injury and before the fully committed haters who are manipulating her succeed in recruiting others through her.

If Monika comes to her senses, all she has to do to extricate herself from this mess is to publicly disavow it, even if she’s sitting in prison for breaking the law, which might be the case. She needs to tell everyone that she was misled, that she was wrong, and that she is sorry for the hateful things she has said. If this happens, I have no doubt that she will mean it, and I will forgive her. I think we would all forgive her. We’d give her a hug and welcome her back to the real world.

Believing in Monika and anticipating that she will turn her life around,

 

— Ben


Screen Shot 2016-08-07 at 4.23.58 PM

Monika Schaefer

My Open Letter to Ben Gadd and the Jasper Environmental Association, January 5 2017 ~ by Monika Schaefer

Happy New Year to you all! Let us hope that this will be the year during which the light of truth becomes ever brighter.

Ben you seem intent on seeing me imprisoned. Let me assure you, that if it should come to that (which I doubt), I would rather be in jail with a free mind, than be a mind-controlled Pavlovian conditioned slave in the Orwellian world of double-speak where peace is war and black is white.

Truth is Hate to those who Hate the Truth.

CIA Director William Casey said in February 1981 in a staff meeting with newly elected President Ronald Reagan, “We’ll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false.”

Thank you very much Ben for bringing up 9/11 in your letter. Most people around the world know that was a false flag event and that controlled demolition brought down the three towers. You claim I sent you a video blaming 9/11 on Zionists, therefore anti-Semitic. In fact I gave you the DVD called “Experts Speak Out” by Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth. Their hallmark is that they investigate the physical aspects of what happened on 9/11, never the “who-done-it”. You reveal your prejudice on that story by implying that ae911truth.org is an anti-Semitic organization. How exactly does their scientific analysis of the chemistry, the architecture, the physics, the thermodynamics etc., add up to anti-Semitism? Who planted that meme into your head?

True, 9/11 was in fact a Zionist operation, therefore the powers-that-be preemptively try to steer people in another direction by using weaponized words such as “anti-Semitic” against anyone who dares question the official narrative.

Would you call me anti-Semitic for pointing out that Israel attacked the USS Liberty in 1967, killing 34 American Servicemen and injuring many more, and tried to blame Egypt? Had they succeeded in sinking the ship, they might have got away with the deception of blaming another country. Blaming a third party for misdeeds is what is called false flag and Israel is very good at it. I would venture a guess that some people in the JEA have never heard of the USS Liberty. That unfortunate “incident” was suppressed by the Johnston administration, and the mainstream media dutifully fell into line.

What about the Zionist bombing of the King David Hotel in 1946, which helped to speed up the establishment of the state of Israel? According to the Jerusalem Post, they rarely call that a terrorist event in Israel, they commemorate it instead.

http://www.jpost.com/Features/In-Thespotlight/This-Week-in-History-The-King-David-Hotel-bombing

Is it anti-Semitic to point out these well-documented facts? “Anti-Semitic” is just a Weaponized Control Trigger word which is meant to shut down rational thought and discussion. In fact, former Israeli Minister Shulamit Aloni agrees with my assessment of that. She calls it a trick, “we always use it…”

Former Israeli Minister Shulamit Aloni- Anti-Semitic Trick!

The Israeli Mossad motto is “By way of Deception, thou shalt make War”. Wouldn’t it be more noble to have a motto about standing up for Truth and Justice and Peace? By way of deception — think about that word!

Formerly Jewish Israeli Gilad Atzmon puts it this way: Jewish power is the ability to silence criticism of Jewish Power.

Regarding WW2 history, nobody has been able to answer my question about the basic maths. In Auschwitz alone, the official death count has dropped by almost 3 million, yet the mythical 6 million number remains the same. In January 1933, the Jewish population of Germany was approximately 522,000. More than half emigrated during the following 6 years. It is difficult to imagine how 6 million could have been herded into gas chambers, even when Jewish populations from surrounding countries are taken into account. The numbers simply don’t add up. And how could there have been so many “survivors”, who then collected reparation money, and still collect reparations to this day, if 6 million were killed? And how is it that pre- and post-war population figures indicate no reduction in Jewish numbers – was there a giant unprecedented baby boom the likes of which has never been seen before or since?

http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=85432

The mythical 6 million number appeared many times in the decades preceding WW2.

http://balder.org/judea/Six-Million-140-Occurrences-Of-The-Word-Holocaust-And-The-Number-6,000,000-Before-The-Nuremberg-Trials-Began.php

Are you familiar with the Doctrine of Judicial Notice? This doctrine allows courts to recognize as “fact” matters that are “common knowledge”. This doctrine has been used in the courts to avoid actual evidence which might run contrary to the victor’s version and Hollywood depiction of the so-called Jewish Holocaust. Evidence is not required because “The Holocaust” is self-evident. How is that for circular logic? Articles 19 and 21 of the Nuremberg trials stated as much, and Justice Thomas T. Johnson used the doctrine of judicial notice in the case by Mel Mermelstein against the Institute for Historical Review in 1981.

See this article for a thorough discussion of the Nuremberg Trials and the Holocaust. You might choose to dismiss it as it comes from the Institute for Historical Review, but keep in mind the perverse logic of the doctrine which I explained in the previous paragraph.  It is a 2-part article, highly footnoted, and very educational.

http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v12/v12p167_webera.html

To all the people who have actively spurned me, actively expelled me from organizations, actively ostracized me (you figure prominently in the JEA strangely enough), it is especially important for you to spend a little bit of time looking into these matters. Even just reading the one article from the IHR to which I supplied the link above, should give you pause to consider that it might not be me who is so 100% wildly wrong on these very important matters. If you react with the common “I refuse to debate this and I refuse to look at this”, how can you be so sure you are 100% right?

Meanwhile you go along with the casting of stones. Are you afraid to look? Do you actually believe I have lost my sanity, causing me to risk all – and to what end? Or might it occur to you in a tiny corner of your brain and heart and soul that just maybe, just maybe, there is another story here, one which is being viciously suppressed.

The Nuremberg Trials truly can be compared to the witch trials of the Middle Ages. This short video puts the matter into that context.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y-o_Fk0ezls

Ben Gadd, you of all people surprise me the most. The American draft dodger from the Vietnam era, the environmental guru, you always stood up for what you believed in. You always told us: question everything, don’t trust authority, governments lie to us. In that light, your outright dismissal and condemnation of me make absolutely no sense to me.

Your behaviour only makes sense if you were Sayanim. If that is the case, everything makes sense!

The fact that this one event in our history is untouchable should be enough to raise serious questions about it. Why are we not allowed to question and investigate this one event? Might it be because there is something to hide? Might it also be due to a particular group of people benefitting from it?

Voltaire said, “To learn who rules over you, simply ask who you are not allowed to criticize.

Finally, to answer the question that some have asked me: “To what end Monika?” A world of lies and deceptions is a world of war and turmoil. That is not the world I want to sit idle in and leave it as such for our children and grandchildren. I desire a world of Peace, Light, Love and Beauty. That comes only through charting our course through the world with a map based on Truth.

Monika Schaefer

Some further thoughts, …

Ben Gadd’s letter gave me the opportunity to write my response (above). I provided many links and many documented facts and I asked a few basic questions. None of that was addressed in this following response from Ben which came the very next day. It is interesting to note that instead of answering any questions or addressing any of the issues at hand, Ben uses language that is intended to so intimidate the mind-softened people to not even dare consider using their own brain. He continues to engage in name-calling and to use plenty of Weaponized Control Trigger words.


January 6th, 2017 from Ben:

Monika’s torrent of words leads to her saying this of me:

“Your behaviour only makes sense if you were Sayanim. If that is the case, everything makes sense!”

I had to look up “Sayanim.” It’s Hebrew for “assistants,” and it refers to Jews living outside Israel who assist the Mossad. More generally, it means Israeli secret agents.

Yikes! I’ve been exposed. (But it does remind to me go give my handler a ring. My cheque is late this month.)

All kidding aside, I am not now, nor have I ever been anyone’s secret agent for anything. Monika is just playing the ultimate card in the conspiracy theorist’s deck. Anyone who opposes the theory is part of the conspiracy.

This is paranoid-delusional, I know, but it’s also a bit scary. Anti-Semites can be quite nasty. They have their enemies list, and if I wasn’t on it already I am now. Should the Truthers come to power — a growing possibility in the Age of Trump — I can expect them to come after me.

That’s how hate speech works. The haters find their targets, denounce them and wait for the mob to do the rest.

After I sent that long reply to Rocky back on December 18th, I noted a long gap in new postings to Monika’s website. (Her anti-Semitic “freespeechmonika.wordpress.com” website, not her benign “monikaschaefer.ca” website.) Perhaps she was just taking some time off from her campaign, but I was hoping that she had withdrawn for some reflection on where all this was taking her. I was really hoping that the next posting would be a heartfelt retraction of the venemous stuff she had been saying.

Alas, not to be. At the end of the year Monika was back, attacking Elizabeth May again as some sort of Zionist puppet and telling us that climate change is caused by you-know-who spreading chemicals through the sky in the form of passenger-jet contrails. This is loonie stuff, but loads of unhappy, gullible people looking for someone to blame their troubles on believe it. Intelligent, articulate and reasonable-sounding Monika is clearly a rising star in their world. I haven’t seen a Donate button on her site, but perhaps that will be next.

Whatever, I’m done with this. Rocky, I’ve said my piece. Monika, for the last time, please, pretty-please, realize that the road you are on leads to Holocaust II.

Sincerely, and ‘bye for now,

 

— Ben


Ben is right in a way, in that I should have been clearer and simply said that his behaviour is like someone who is a Sayan and not imply (with my word if..) that he might actually be a real live Sayan. He says he is not, so there you have it.

For this he calls me “paranoid-delusional”, while in the next breath, engages in his own “paranoid-delusional” thoughts by saying, … “Anti-Semites can be quite nasty. They have their enemies list, and if I wasn’t on it already I am now. Should the Truthers come to power — a growing possibility in the Age of Trump — I can expect them to come after me.”

Ben, take a big breath, calm down and don’t worry your little PC heart that the knock on the door at 2 or 3 pm is the new Gestapo. (PC does not stand for Progressive Conservative like here in Canada, so just in case you have to look it up – its Politically Correct!) It will just be your neighbour wanting to borrow a cup of sweet lies that you have accepted and stored in abundance. Sweet comfortable lies that I have now thrown in the trash.

Ben then accuses me of being a “hater” and of saying “venomous” stuff. Isn’t this an ironic accusation when all I’m saying with regard to the “Holocaust” is that the German people were NOT guilty of that crime and there is overwhelming evidence to support that position? Now with 9/11, I am accusing organised jewry of carrying out that crime. So, you see, accusations of being a “hater”, etc., cuts both ways and can be used to prevent the truth from coming out. Are the police and courts “haters” when they accuse the Mafia of crimes? Are the police and courts “haters” when they sentence revisionists to years in prison for thinking the wrong thoughts?

Finally Ben ends with this melodramatic flourish, … “Whatever, I’m done with this. Rocky, I’ve said my piece. Monika, for the last time, please, pretty-please, realize that the road you are on leads to Holocaust II.”

Besides begging the very question of “Holocaust I” that is at the heart of the issue at hand, I believe that people like Ben Gadd are unwittingly helping to create a horrifying tyranny that allows no dissent, that crushes anyone who questions what organised jewry says.

So Ben, don’t run away in “outrage”. Perhaps I am wrong, so please engage me in polite and reasoned debate on substantial issues like the “Holocaust” or 9/11.

You never know how minds can be changed.


SOURCE ARTICLE

How the ‘Good Jew’ – ‘Bad Jew’ Mind Game Works by Mike King

 GoodJewBadJewHeader

Since the days of the 1947- 48 “Partition” & State (aka the theft of half of Palestine),the Zionist Jews have been playing a clever hustle on not only the dispossessed Palestinians, but also upon the decent and empathetic people of the world. It’s a variation of the “good cop-bad cop” interrogation technique we often see played out in detective dramas. You know how it goes: one cop shouts at the suspect like a rabid dog while his partner takes a softer approach. At times, the “good cop” will even turn against the “bad cop”, ordering him to leave the room and calm down. In the simplicity of the suspect’s mind, the “good cop” is thus more reasonable and trustworthy. “All cops aren’t jerks. I’ll talk to this one”, reasons the clueless suspect.The only difference between the ‘good cop-bad cop’ and ‘good Jew-bad Jew’ routines is that in the former, the suspect is usually guilty; whereas in the latter case, the poor Palestinians, as well as their sympathizers worldwide, are always the innocent marks of the devious Zionists.Screen Shot 2014-07-26 at 10.17.07 AMThe Zionist-Marxist Jew is an extremely cunning manipulator! 

In 1948 virtually all Jews, with the exception of one Hasidic sect, applauded the creation of “the State of Israel” (bow your head in reverence as you say that). It was President Harry “Hiroshima-Nagasaki” Truman’s election year payoff to the Zionists, whose reciprical support resulted in a narrow Election victory for Truman; a victory so slim that one newspaper had prematurely published the iconic ‘Dewey Defeats Truman’ headline.

Screen Shot 2014-07-26 at 10.17.21 AM

The UN Partition / Truman State of 1947-48 now meant that hundreds of Arab towns and villages instantly fell under the jurisdiction of the new “State of Israel” (bow your head in reverence as you say that). No one had bothered to ask the Arabs, neither within Palestine nor outside of Palestine, for permission to subjugate the Palestinian people under Zionist rule and plop down a new non-Arab nation right in the heart of the ‘Holy Land’. Understandably, the Palestinian people, who had lived there for many centuries, weren’t about to just pack up and leave their farms, businesses, homes and towns. You see, they had to be “persuaded” to evacuate what had suddenly been declared to be ‘Israel”. Enter, from stage “far right”, the “bad Jews”.

Screen Shot 2014-07-26 at 10.17.29 AM

The original 1947-48 Partition borders have long since been obliterated….as the ‘good Jew – bad Jew’ game played on!

Flashback to 1946, clandestine Jewish terror groups, such as Menachem Begin’s Irgun and David Ben Gurion’s Hagana committed numerous murders and bombings of the British officials. The British had taken Palestine away from the Turks as part of a dirty World War I deal they had made with the Zionists (We’ll get America into WW 1. You take Palestine and allow massive Jewish immigration there). Having gotten rid of the Ottoman Turkish control, now the ungrateful Zionists wanted the British out of Palestine! Their numerous anti-British terror acts included the killing of 91 people when the King David Hotel was blown up.

Screen Shot 2014-07-26 at 10.17.38 AM

After the British had left and Israel was declared, these “bad Jews” began the process of “ethnic cleansing’ by carrying out sickening massacres of defenseless Arab men, women, elderly, and children. The most notorious of these events of 1948 was the Massacre at Deir Yassin; an atrocity so extreme that it triggered an attack on the new State by the Arab nations of Egypt, Syria, Jordan and Iraq. (The 1948 War). At Deir Yassin, 200 Palestinians were shot or stabbed to death by Jewish terrorists. This and other atrocities caused the Arabs to flee in terror from one village after another after another. And that is the true story of how the ‘bad Jews” first chased the British protectors out of “Israeli” Palestine, and later on, the Palestinians themselves.

Screen Shot 2014-07-26 at 10.17.46 AM

As the violent birth pangs of the terrorist ‘State of Israel’ (you know the routine) were reverberating throughout the region and indeed the world, the ‘good Jews’ made a public spectacle of disavowing terrorism. “We support the the new State of Israel. But we denounce the terrorist methods of Irgun and Hagana.” declared the ‘good Jews’.

In December of 1948, a group of prominent American Jews (including the overrated scientist Albert Einstein & the writer Hannah Arendt)  even went so far as to publish a ‘Letter to the Editor’ for the Jewish owned New York Times, denouncing Begin’s Irgun and Freedom Party as terrorists:

“Among the most disturbing political phenomena of our times is the emergence in the newly created state of Israel of the “Freedom Party” (Tnuat Haherut), a political party closely akin in its organization, methods, political philosophy and social appeal to the Nazi and Fascist parties. It was formed out of the membership and following of the former Irgun Zvai Leumi, a terrorist, right-wing, chauvinist organization in Palestine.”……

“A shocking example was their behavior in the Arab village of Deir Yassin. This village, off the main roads and surrounded by Jewish lands, had taken no part in the war….terrorist bands attacked this peaceful village, which was not a military objective in the fighting, killed most of its inhabitants (240 men, women, and children) and kept a few of them alive to parade as captives through the streets of Jerusalem. Most of the Jewish community was horrified at the deed, and the Jewish Agency sent a telegram of apology to King Abdullah of Trans-Jordan. But the terrorists, far from being ashamed of their act, were proud of this massacre, publicized it widely, and invited all the foreign correspondents present in the country to view the heaped corpses and the general havoc at Deir Yassin.”

The Deir Yassin incident exemplifies the character and actions of the Freedom Party.”

Screen Shot 2014-07-26 at 10.17.58 AM

Strong language, BUT, the hypocrisy of the “good Jews’ of 1948 is revealed by their contradictory support for what Einstein proudly referred to as “our Israel”. One can make the argument, in 2014, that two entire generation of Jews have now been born and raised in Israel; and therefore it is not realistic for them to pack up and evacuate. But in 1948, the Partition was still a straight up THEFT. If these ‘good Jews’ were so good, why even support “our Israel”, established without any input from the Arab inhabitants, at all? Just a few decades earlier, the British had been willing to establish a Jewish homeland in a virgin portion of sunny and resource rich East Africa. Why didn’t the ‘good Jews’ of 1948 seek to take them up on that deal now?

Screen Shot 2014-07-26 at 10.18.20 AM

The British plan to set aside a piece of East Africa as a Jewish homeland was mocked by Zionists as “the Uganda Scheme”. The Jews could have had rich land, more resources, and no conflict.

The ‘good Jews’ may have condemned the violent means by which the British were chased out and the Palestinian Arabs were uprooted; but could they really have been that naive as to believe that other means were possible? Without the extreme violence, the new State of Israel, which the ‘good Jews’ supported wholeheartedly, could not have come into existence. Surely, a “genius” such as Einstein must have known that.

Expecting to assume dominion over someone else’s cherished land, towns, villages, farms, homes etc. without any bloodshed is like saying you want to invade someone’s house without violence. It would be like a Roman Emperor of antiquity declaring: “We must conquer the barbarian nations for the glory of Rome, but I don’t want any rough stuff.” Come on Mr. Einstein! I realize that the great Nikola Tesla denounced you as a scientific charlatan, (“a long haired crank”) but you can’t possibly be that stupid!

Screen Shot 2014-07-26 at 10.18.34 AM

1951: Just three years after “condemning” Israeli terrorism, ‘good-Jew’ (and Marxist) St. Albert Einstein laughs it up with Haganah terrorist-turned-Prime Minister David Ben Gurion. It was the ‘bad Jew’ Ben Gurion who engineered the false-flag killing of Jews living in Iraq. These killings frightened the Iraqi Jews into emigrating to Israel.  * Ben Gurion’s grand nephew, Les Moonves, is President and CEO of CBS.

Now I don’t know about you folks, but if someone were to just walk into my house and announce his “peaceful” intention to assume ownership, the skull of said ‘good’ invader is going to meet with the business end of a crow bar, repeatedly. Unfortunately for the Palestinian farm folk, crow bars and shovels were no match for the automatic machine guns and hand grenades of the Jewish terror gangs, whose leaders later went on to become future Prime Ministers (Begin, Ben Gurion, Shamir)

So, what gives? Why the manipulative game playing? Its simple.

The Zionist Jews of the 1940’s & 50’s understood that if the entire race was branded as racist or pro-terrorist, it would be “bad for the Jews”. Stunts such as the NY Times letter penned by Einstein, Arendt and friends served the important purpose of stating to the world, “Please don’t blame the peace loving Jewish people for King David & Deir Yassin. It’s only the extremists like Begin & Ben Gurian who act like that.”

This type of inoculation against “anti-Semitism” always comes as a great relief to the anti-racism crowd who might otherwise have to remove their six-pointed starry-eyed blinders and see the Zionist Jews for what they truly are. With self-righteous certainty, the oh-so-relieved anti-racist can now declare: “You cannot blame Israel and the Jews for Palestinian persecution. There are many good Jews who oppose the extremists.”

Of course, there are Jews in Israel and America (some of whom are fans of TomatoBubble, I’m happy to report) who truly are horrified and angered over Israel’s brutal oppression of the Arabs; but their number is not nearly as great as the frequent self-serving proclamations of the ‘good Jews’ might suggest. Apart altogether from ‘good Jews’ and ‘bad Jews’ are the ‘sheeple Jews’; lost souls who see pograms and Holocaust plots under every rock. They truly do believe that their lives are in constant danger from “anti-Semitic” Arabs, ‘Nazis’, Catholics, Tsarists, Klansmen, Martians etc.

In the present day, we still see this ‘good Jew-bad Jew’ scam being played out in the public arena. There is no shortage of ‘good Jews’ who are critical of the ‘bad Jew’ Bibi Satanyahu and the brazenly genocidal deeds of his psycho Likud Party. A good example would be the recent anti-Israeli skit by the “left wing” (good Jew) host of Comedy Central, John Stewart (Liebowitz). Stewart’s sarcastic mockery of Israeli ‘roof knocking’ (a practice by which the Israelis will so “magnimously” warn the Arabs just prior to blowing up their homes) drew the ire of the “right wing” neo-cons such as nationally syndicated radio host Mark Levin (bad Jews).

But Stewart and other “good Jews’ will never condemn the hunger blockading of Gaza, nor mention the illegal use of White Phosphorous bombs, nor talk about the harvesting of Palestinian organs for sale on the Black Market, nor advocate for a return to the original 1948 (aka pre 1967) Partition borders, nor call for the arrest and trial of Israeli war criminals past and present, and nor will they ever even come close to acknowledging the full scope of the historical and non-stop abuse of the Palestinians. As for the ‘good Jews’ in the Israeli Knesset and the U.S. Congress, the strongest language they can muster is, “We call upon both sides to engage in dialogue and find a peaceful solution.”

Screen Shot 2014-07-26 at 10.18.53 AM

 

The ‘good Jew’ Stewart-Liebowitz (left) did a funny anti-Israeli routine, but he remains silent on the big picture while still slipping in some anti-Palestinian propaganda. The ‘bad Jew’ Levin then took Stewart to task for being a ‘self hating Jew’.

Let’s make an analogy to ‘good bystander-bad bystander’, an imaginary situation in which an innocent little old lady is being mercilessly beaten by a muscular, drug crazed, violent street thug:

“Bad Bystander”: “Ha. Ha. This is fun to watch. Beat that old bitch some more.”

“Good Bystander”: “This is a tragedy. I call on upon both sides to stop the violence and resume talks.”

There is also a variation of motive to the ‘good Jew – bad Jew’ game; in which the Jewish anger towards the “hard liners” is sincere, but motivated by selfish reasons. In this scenario, the “good Jew” is upset with Bibi Satanyahu’s violent recklessness, not out of any love or empathy for the poor bombed out Palestinians, but solely because he fears that by taking too hard of a line, the Likud Party Zionists may trigger worldwide condemnation of Israel and even, -gasp- “anti-Semitism”.

If we were flies on the wall of a Tel Aviv Synagogue, we might overhear a heated conversation between Satanyahu and a ‘good Jew’ go like this:

‘Good Jew’ (GJ): “Oy vey Bibi! What the hell are you doing in Gaza? You’ve got the whole world hating Jews again!”

Satanyahu: “Calm down Ari. We own America. You think that queer swartza in the White House is going to stop us?”

(GJ): “No. I will not calm down! Have you seen the protests in Paris, Berlin, and London? You want another Holocaust?

Satanyahu: “Europe has always been anti-Semtic. What do I care? We have nukes now.”

(GJ): “And what about our wholly owned Arab puppets? If you keep this up in Gaza, all of our moderate Arab friends in the Middle East will be forced to run for cover. We’ll never get to a New World Order.”

Satanyahu: “That’s exactly what I want. If radical regimes come to power in places like Egypt and Iraq, the U.S. will be forced to blow up the region. That’s when we make our big move. We expand from the Nile to the Euprates baby! World Government can come later.”

(GJ):  “It’s too soon Bibi. It’s too risky. Just let the Arab animals stay in Gaza for now. We’ve already got the hunger blockade on them.”

Satanyahu: “We’ve waited long  enough. Now we strike! Grow a pair Ari!”

(GJ): “You are meshuganah (crazy) Bibi! You know that? 100% certified meshuganah!”

Satanyahu: “Ari, my dear friend. What you call ‘meshuganah’, I call chutzpah! How are Miriam and the kids doing by the way?

(GJ): “Oh, everyone is doing great. Isaac’s Bar Mitzvah is next week.”

Satanyahu: “Oy vey! How time flies! Shalom my friend.”

(GJ): “Shalom.”

*

So you see, no where in the expressed “concerns” of such a ‘good Jew’ is there ever any true empathy for the thousands of innocent people killed or maimed by Satanyahu and his neo-con allies. Crocodile tears notwithstanding, the great “debate” is never really about the victims, even it it does sound sincere at times. No, the debate is only and always about “what’s good for the Jews.” And that is why the 45 year old circle-jerk known as  “The Middle East Peace Process” is a sick and twisted joke played upon the Palestinians, as well as the naive do-gooders who continue to place their trust in ‘the good Jews’.

Screen Shot 2014-07-26 at 10.19.03 AM

‘Good Jew’  and former US Secretary of State Madeline Albright has publicly criticized ‘bad Jew’ Netanyahu for making Israel look bad. Recall that this is the same woman who, on the show ’60 Minutes’ once said that the death of 1 million Iraqi’s “was worth it”!

The Jewess Albright often played the related game of ‘creating moral equivalence where there is none’ – such as once equating the legitimate complaints of Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat with the monstrous lies of Bibi Satanyahu. Said ‘good-Jew’ Albright in 1998: “I am sick and tired of hearing you (Arafat & Netanyahu) give me a pile full of complaints about the other guy. That is not going to help us get to the point where we can make tough decisions.”

Arafat later died of poisoning (here), evidently at the hands of ‘the bad jews’ (Mossad). Of course, the ‘good Jews’ are very quick to dismiss the apparent murder of Arafat as ‘conspiracy theory’.

 Source: http://www.tomatobubble.com/id631.html#.U9MTFTqD0MU.email