PRESS RELEASE: FREE TRADE WHISTLE BLOWER SHELLEY ANN CLARK UNDER ATTACK IN OTTAWA

January 6, 2011 by

NewRadLogo3

Editor’s Note: For those who have been following or are presently interested in the ongoing controversy surrounding the North American Free Trade Agreement this news breaking story should be of prime interest.

I have know Shelley Ann Clark for close to 15 years now and can vouch for her integrity, indefatigable energy and dedication to our nation.

Shelley Ann Clark desperately needs our help. Please lend your assistance to one of Canada’s foremost whistle blowers by passing this Press Release on to as many associates that you can. Let’s do our utmost to bring this story to the attention of the msm and Canadians in general.

Shelley Ann’s efforts cannot be left to die in vain along with our sovereignty.

Sincerely,

Arthur Topham
Publisher/Editor
The Radical Press
Canada’s Radical News Network
“Digging to the root of the issues since 1998″
http://www.radicalpress.com
radical@radicalpress.com

–––––––––––––––––––––––

PRESS COMMUNIQUE

TO BE RELEASED JANUARY 6, 2011

FREE TRADE WHISTLE BLOWER SHELLEY ANN CLARK UNDER ATTACK IN OTTAWA

The “mainstream” national media won’t touch her and lawyers and politicians will not sue her.

Shelley Ann Clark is the Federal Civil servant with 30 years experience who worked in the Canada-U.S. Free Trade Negotiations Office as an Executive Assistant to the third highest ranking negotiator on Mulroney’s team.
Between 1986 and 1988 Clark was ordered to falsify and eventually shred briefing papers designed to mislead provincial premiers as to what was really being given away in the Free Trade Agreement (FTA).  In March 1988 she was ordered by her boss to secretly remove key documents from the Free Trade Office to the trunk of his car.   While screening the material to be removed, Clark came across a “Step-by-Step Implementation Scheme” that would eventually lead to the merger of Canada and the U.S.A.  We are now in 2010, and even though there was no media fanfare announcing this event, IT HAS OCCURRED.  You are seeing evidence everywhere as more and more American owned businesses are moving into Canada and forcing Canadian businesses to shut down. You can see it in the privileges that American businessmen are receiving when investing in Canada. Favoritism towards American investors is in evidence. Speak to Canadians who are trying to invest and assume they will receive the same privileges as their American counterparts.  Listen to Paul Hellyer’s speech that he gave to his audience when he launched his Canadian Action Party in 1997.

In June, 1993, Clark went public with her explosive story. She ran for political office in the Federal elections.  At the invitation of Canadians she traveled across Canada as a guest speaker in order to inform Canadians that their country had been sold to the Americans.

In April, 1995, the harassment she suffered at the hands of the federal government and its agents finally took its toll and she collapsed for the first time.

After a four year absence, in the fall of 1999 she returned to the Department of Foreign Affairs.  Since then, Clark’s career went into a downward spiral.

In December, 2000, the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade declared her a “surplus” employee. In January, 2001, she was offered a position at the Public Service Commission of Canada (PSC) NOT as an Executive Assistant or Administrator that are her areas of expertise, but as a data entry clerk and part-time receptionist.  Having a family to support she accepted the offer.

From January 2001 to April 2004, the PSC treated Shelley Ann in an inequitable, disrespectful, unjust and differential manner. She was ridiculed by Human Resources Managers when she brought them her Curriculum Vitae.  They laughed and told her “you are asking me to take one huge leap of faith to believe anything that you have put down in your CV”. No one at the PSC would consider her for any job that would have been commensurate with her experience and qualifications.  She was ostracized by everyone.    Staff meetings were held without including her. After each one of these staff meetings she was called in to her immediate supervisor’s office and told that the staff was complaining about her because she could not do the job.  All of these irregular activities by the PSC led to her second collapse in January of 2004.

On January 21, 2005, Shelley Ann was forced into an early retirement when the Public Service Commission would not allow her to return to the workplace on a gradual return to work program. She was even refused to take on the duties of a Receptionist who was a Temp Agency person.

On February 28, 2006, after a lengthy battle with health problems caused by the stress inflicted on her by 11 years of harassment by the Federal Government, Shelley Ann filed a complaint with the Canadian Human Rights Commission (CHRC).

On March 6, 2008, the Canadian Human Rights Commission submitted  their Investigation Report.  The decision was made to proceed to a Canadian Human Rights Tribunal (CHRT) Hearing.

On September 14, 2009, a five day hearing began at Canadian the Human Rights Tribunal (CHRT). Shelley Ann, with no legal experience, stood alone and represented herself against a Federal Government Legal Team of five people.  She did not have the funds to pay for a lawyer.  Shelley Ann approached a list of lawyers from Ottawa law firms begging them to represent her on “contingency”.  They all refused.

In the Hearing Room Shelley Ann was obstructed from presenting her case at every turn, while the Department of Justice lawyers were allowed to say and do anything they wanted.

On February 3, 2010, the Chairman of the CHRT rendered his decision in favour of the federal government.
However, the Chairman did arrive at the conclusion that the Public Service Commission’s behavior towards Shelley Ann had been so outrageous that he made note of this in his report.

Here are some of the statements made by the CHRT’s Chairman, Mr. Rejean Belanger in his report “Reasons for Decision”:

•     Point # 166 – “It seems to us that this six-week period the Complainant spent alone in an empty office, that none of the witnesses, including the Chief of Human Resource Operations for the Public Service Commission, were able to explain, represents an aberrant and unimaginable situation”.

•     Point # 167 – “However, it is a neglectful and/or an unpardonable oversight by Human Resources.  Given everything we have learned about the Complainant, we are of the opinion that she certainly did not deserve to be treated in such a way.”

•     Point # 168 – “We can easily imagine the anguish and the depression that the Complainant might have felt or experienced during this extended period.  If an employer wanted to discourage or destroy an employee, there is no better way to do so.”

In February, 2010, Shelley Ann filed an application with the Federal Court to appeal the decision rendered by the CHRT.

On March 22, 2010, Shelley Ann filed her 37 page SWORN AFFIDAVIT with the Federal Court along with over 300 pages of Exhibits that she prepared without any legal assistance.

On December 14, 2010, Shelley Ann received a Court Order by e-mail signed by Chief Justice, Allan Lutfy. The Court Order states: “Point #1: This proceeding shall continue as a specially managed proceeding.”

When Shelley Ann put the question to a clerk at the Federal Court Public Counter what Point # 1 meant she was advised that the usual standard practice for persons bringing a case to the Federal Court is that they never know in advance what Judge will be assigned to their case. It’s like playing Russian Roulette.  Which Judge a person gets is not pre-determined.  It all depends on who is on duty on that particular day.  However, in Shelley Ann Clark’s case a Judge had already been pre-determined and specially assigned to her case ahead of time.

In Shelley Ann’s case, Chief Justice, Allan Lutfy has been specially assigned to be the Judge overseeing the trial.  Prothonotary, Roza Aronovitch has been assigned as the Case Management Judge.  WE ask that everyone who reads this “Proposed” Press Release goes onto their GOOGLE SEARCH ENGINE and enters the name “Alan Lutfy” as well as linking to the following website: http://www.waterwarcrimes.com/contact-us—privately.html.

These two sources will clearly demonstrate to you who Shelley Ann Clark is up against when she goes into the Federal Court Room sometime in the new year.   The information that you will read from the above-mentioned links will make it clear to you why it is imperative that Shelley Ann, at this point, needs legal representation to ensure her well being.  This lawyer must  a) be willing to take her case on contingency; b) come from outside the province of Ontario and especially Ottawa and c) have the stones to go up against Chief Justice Allan Lutfy.

Because her case is being heard in a Federal Court, a lawyer from any province can represent her. WE are appealing to everyone to help her find legal representation.

As of the date of this Press Release, January 6, 2011, the Federal Court has not yet set a date for her case to be heard.  We, who support Shelley Ann, believe that she is being denied her human rights by not having a lawyer to represent her in the court room to settle this issue once and for all. This case does not bode well for Canada whose Constitution claims to respect Human Rights and boasts that we live in a democratic nation.

-30-
 
 
For further information please contact:Margaret R. Bowlby
Public Relations Agent and Researcher for Shelley Ann Clark

e-mail at: fb847@ncf.ca

 

Filed Under: Canadian "Just-Us" System, Canadian Human Rights Act, Canadian Human Rights Commission, Canadian Human Rights Tribunal, Canadian Identity/Sovereignty, Canadian Politics, CanUSMex Issues, Conspiracy, Corporations, Editor's Zone, Human Rights/orgs, Law & Justice, North American Union (NAU)

Thank You All!!!

October 15, 2009 by


On behalf of my lovely wife Shastah and myself I want to take this moment to thank everyone who made our trip to the 24th annual George Orwell dinner in Victoria, B.C. a reality.

Travel from our relatively remote area of the province to the island is expensive and it was only due to the generosity of those who donated funds that we were able to attend this important gathering of free speech advocates from across Canada.

This was the second time that we were able to enjoy the fellowship of people on the front lines of those fighting to retain the right to speak out their truths in the face of a brutal and alarmingly dangerous force: the government of Canada and its bureaucratic agent known as the Canadian Human Rights Commission (CHRC).

Due to time restrictions at the moment I cannot elaborate on the meeting but will do so over the next while.

Arthur Topham

Pub/Ed

RadicalPress.com

Filed Under: Anti-Defamation League (ADL), Anti-War Activism, ARA Terrorists, B.C. Liberal Party, B.C. Politics, Canadian "Just-Us" System, Canadian Human Rights Tribunal, Canadian Identity/Sovereignty, Canadian Jewish Congress, Canadian Politics, CanUSMex Issues, Chris Cook/Contributor, Editor's Zone, Gaza, Germany, Indigenous Nations, Iraq, Jewish Porn Industry, Jews, Judaism, Middle East, Mind/Spirit, Peace, Religion, Revisionism, U.S. Democratic Party

When Truth Becomes “Anti-Semitic”: What World Famous People Say About Jews and Zionism

January 13, 2009 by

When Truth Becomes “Anti-Semitic”: What World Famous People Say About Jews and Zionism

Introduction by Arthur Topham

http://www.RadicalPress.com

radical@radicalpress.com
January 13, 2009

In a recent screed of January 10, 2009 (The ‘Oldest Hatred’ Lives, from Gaza to Florida http://www.ocregister.com/articles/hamas-gaza-jewish-2277487-muslims-state ) outlining a list of relatively minor examples of anti-Jewish sentiment resulting from Israel’s current butchery of the defenseless Palestinians of Gaza, Canadian journalist Mark Steyn, one of Zionism’s key literary brokers for North America’s Jewish-owned media cartel, attempts to lay the blame for the growing public outrage on the doorstep of Palestine’s democratically elected government Hamas along with other Islamic extremists, Muslims and anyone, anywhere expressing “anti-Zionist” sentiments.

After listing off his abbreviated litany of “anti-Semitic” attacks upon various Jewish individuals and groups he writes, “Forget, for the moment, Gaza. Forget that the Palestinian people are the most comprehensively wrecked people on the face of the earth. For the past sixty years they have been entrusted to the care of the United Nations, the Arab League, the PLO, Hamas and the “global community” — and the results are pretty much what you’d expect” all the while conveniently leaving out of his deceptively narrative description the blatant historic fact that it was the newly-formed Israeli government itself who, via mendacity and sheer ill-will and bloody terror, drove the legal inhabitants of Palestine out of their homes and villages and into that hideous concentration camp we now know as Gaza.

This simplistic and transparent ploy by Steyn to high jack the legitimate concerns of people around the world via jingoist sophistry and twisted argument in favour of the worn canard of “anti-Semitism” falls flat in the face of an abundance of gross images of mutilated, dead and dying Palestinian children, women and elderly, yet this doesn’t deter him in his vainglorious denial of the truth from continuing to ride his blood-steyned steed further into the fray of unabashed Zionist media propaganda, thrashing about with his sword of lies and brandishing his bullet-ridden “anti-Semite” banner – one flapping madly about in the righteous winds of vehement feelings of horror expressed by decent people around the planet incensed and ashamed that such despicable acts of cruel and wanton bloodshed could still be committed against the human family at the beginning of the 21 Century.

But let’s, as Steyn says, “forget Gaza” “and instead ponder the reaction to Gaza in Scandinavia, France, the United Kingdom, Canada, and golly, even Florida. As the delegitimization of Israel has metastasized, we are assured that criticism of the Jewish state is not the same as anti-Semitism. We are further assured that anti-Zionism is not the same as anti-Semitism, which is a wee bit more of a stretch. Only Israel attracts an intellectually respectable movement querying its very existence.”

In a token of submission to the Zionist god of cunning and perfidy Steyn tries comparing Israel with the state of Pakistan as part of recent political machinations and Mossad false flag operations by the Zionist-controlled US government to vilify Pakistan before eventually attacking it as yet another rogue, “terrorist” state. Of Pakistan, and with obvious intent to deflect attention from Israel, Steyn sardonically states, “I happen to think the creation of Pakistan was the greatest failure of post-war British imperial policy.”

Steyn’s culminating and rather crass attempt to convince his western readers that all who reject Zionism are in fact Jew-hating bigots, hypocrites and “anti-Semites” is eventually steeped in a feeble flourish of anti-Muslim artistry, punctuated with an excerpt from the Syrian poet, Nizar Qabbani, suggesting that the people of Gaza are all “mad”. And why are they mad? Why because, as Steyn so lucidly tells us, they exhibit “the enthusiastic adoption of the same pathologies” that mainstream Europe is now expressing in their “anti-Semitic” attacks but of course the Palestinians are even “more deranged — and in the end” their resistance to the phosphorus bombs and DU bullets of Israeli justice “will prove just as self-destructive.”

Such is the ethereal substance of the Zionist media’s #1 propaganda broker Mark Steyn. If you don’t approve of the butcher’s banquet that Israel and its pro-Zionist supporters around the world are feasting upon then by definition you are “anti-Semitic” and a Jew-hater.

Which brings me now to the list of world famous people, who by Steyn’s and Zionism’s definition, fit the description of “anti-Semite”. It was one of these people listed, H.H. Beamish who, in a New York address in October 1937 made the following observation:

“In 1848 the word “anti-Semitic” was invented by the Jews to prevent the use of the word “Jew.” The right word for them is “Jew” …”

Like gemstones and special treats of food I would guess that almost everybody loves reading quotes. The ones that follow are the most comprehensive list related to the issue of “anti-Semitism” that I am aware of. They are offered here to the internet community as one small token of respect for the inhumane suffering of the Palestinian people of all of Palestine and the Arab world in general. They are also dedicated to those brave truth-seeking men and women who now languish in German prisons because they had the fortitude, the fore-knowledge and the courage to question the Zionist Lie. God bless and keep them all safe from any further harm.

If readers of these quotes feel they are being wrongly accused by the likes of Mark Steyn and the Zionist warlords I am certain that by the time they complete reading them they will not feel alone in their gut reaction to what is going on in Gaza today.
——

“In the beginning was the word and the word was that the Talmudic Jews were anathema to universal justice and peace for all non-Jewish peoples of the earth.“
~ Arthur Topham, January 13, 2009

[Read more...]

Filed Under: Afghanistan, Alternative Media, Anarchism, anti-Semitism, Anti-War Activism, ARA Terrorists, Arab Perspectives, B.C. Liberal Party, B.C. Politics, B.C. Supreme Court, Canadian Politics, CanUSMex Issues, Corporations, Edgar J. Steele, Editor's Zone, First Nations of Turtle Island, Germany, Gilad Atzmon, Harriet Nahanee, Human Rights/orgs, Iraq, Islam, Jewish Lobby, Jewish Media Monopoly, Jewish Porn Industry, Jews, Jews Behind Bolshevik Revolution, Jonathan Cook, Judaism, Law & Justice, Lebanon, Letters, Mainstream Mindcontrol Media (M3), National Socialism (NAZI), Native Land Claims, Noam Chomsky, Orthodox Jews Against Zionism, Political Prisoners, Psychedelic Substances, Religion, Revisionism, The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, U.S. Foreign/Domestic Policies, U.S. Republican Party, U.S. Torture, United Kingdom/politics, United Nations

A Response to: The Security and Prosperity Partnership: Jelly Beans and Potato Soup by David Ingram

December 16, 2007 by

A Response to: The Security and Prosperity Partnership: Jelly Beans and Potato Soup

by David Ingram
taxman@centa.com

Saturday, Dec. 15, 2007

I, of course, support the SPP / North American Union, or as I prefer to call it, Fortress North America.

It is ludicrous to have 20,000 Civil servants protecting the borders between Mexico and the US and Canada and the US while still supposedly protecting our seaports from the scallywags from. Africa, Antarctica, Asia, Australia, Europe and New Zealand.

France, Germany, Spain, etc have not lost any sovereignty with the European Union and their Euro currency has done better against world currencies than any other.

In my lifetime, Germans were killing The French.  It has been 1814 since British Troops from Canada burnt down what became the White House and every other federal building in Washington, DC and attacked Fort Henry in Baltimore prompting Francis Scott Key to write “The Star Spangled Banner”.  I always laugh when they play the SSB at sporting events because of course, the bombs bursting in Air and the Rockets Red Glare was a description of the British Attack on Fort Henry which still had its flag flying in the morning.

Today,  almost 200 years later, we have this silly border and thousands of armed guards (both sides of the border now) checking all the people going back and forth between Canada and the US.  For WHY??

The sooner we have a single currency and open up North America to the free trade of goods AND people, the better.
[Read more...]

Filed Under: Canadian "Just-Us" System, Canadian Identity/Sovereignty, Canadian Politics, CanUSMex Issues, Conspiracy, Corporations, Editor's Zone, Mainstream Mindcontrol Media (M3), North American Union (NAU), Political Zionism, U.S. Foreign/Domestic Policies

The Security and Prosperity Partnership: Jelly Beans and Potato Soup

December 15, 2007 by

http://www.agoracosmopolitan.com/home/Frontpage/2007/12/14/01996.html

The Security and Prosperity Partnership: Jelly Beans and Potato Soup

by Hal. C. Sisson, QC

Jelly beans are funny per se; you never find them in discussion of serious matters, but usually used in a humourous or derisive manner. Stephen Harper’s spin doctors know this, which is precisely why they used jelly beans as an example when referring to the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP) that is more transparently described as the North American Union (NAU). Couple of years ago people said the NAU was only a ludicrous conspiracy theory never to be implemented. Not any more. The question now is are we going to be a part of it?

Prime Minister Harper intimated in his August speech in Montebello, Quebec, that the terms of the SPP agreement being discussed between Canada, the United States and Mexico was nothing more than an attempt to harmonize the policies, laws, rules, and regulations regarding trade of jelly beans throughout North America. The treaty would make them more easily accessible to the jelly-bean eaters of the continent. “Is the sovereignty of Canada going to fall apart if we standardize the jelly bean?” he asked sarcastically as he glossed over the true content of the subject matter in these traitorous treaties.. Nothing to see here folks, go on about your business. All treaties like NAFTA and SPP do is establish laws that are beyond the reach of our national government. I know best so don’t worry.
[Read more...]

Filed Under: Canadian Identity/Sovereignty, Canadian Politics, CanUSMex Issues, Conspiracy, Corporations, Editor's Zone, Fascist U.S.A., Mainstream Mindcontrol Media (M3), New World Order, North American Union (NAU), Political Zionism, U.S. Foreign/Domestic Policies

“WE’D RATHER BE CANADIAN’

August 24, 2007 by

From: Connie Fogal conniefogal@telus.net
Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 02:02:30 -0700

Leader of Canadian Action Party Calls for Non Confidence Motion in Federal Government

“WE’D RATHER BE CANADIAN’

CONNIE FOGAL, Leader of the Canadian Action Party, CAP/PAC, calls for a September 2007 MOTION of NON CONFIDENCE in the Conservative government arising out of its integration of Canada into a North American Union.

Whereas Liberal Prime Minister Paul Martin, President George Bush of the USA and President Vincente Fox of Mexico in Waco Texas in March 2005 entered an agreement called the Security and Prosperity Partnership Agreement, (S.P.P.) which intention and effect is to harmonize and integrate the three countries of Canada, U.S.A. and Mexico into a North American Union;

Whereas immediately thereafter Prime Minister Martin assigned three Liberal cabinet ministers, David Emerson, Anne MacClellan, and David Pettigrew the task of directing the institutional implementation of the integration through the executive branch of the Canadian government which ministers reported back to the leaders in June 2005 of their progress to that date;

Whereas the Conservative government of Stephen Harper recommitted to the S.P.P with President Bush and President Fox in March of 2006, and is continuing the implementation of the integration of Canada into a North American Union with the U.S.A. and Mexico;

Whereas Prime Minister Harper appointed three cabinet ministers (currently Stockwell Day, Maxime Bernier, and Peter McKay) to continue the integration through the executive branch of the Canadian government, which ministers reported back to the leaders in June 2006 of their progress to that date, and reported again in 2007;

Whereas entering and implementing the Security and Prosperity Partnership Agreement is an abuse of and beyond the reach of the Prime Minister’s and Cabinet’s executive power;

Whereas the three national leaders have adopted and submitted to a North American Competitiveness Council comprised of representatives of industry who advise and direct the Leaders and their cabinets on the institutionalization of the North American Union through the executive arm of government;

Whereas the members of the North American Competitiveness Council are:
[Read more...]

Filed Under: Canadian Action Party, Canadian Identity/Sovereignty, Canadian Politics, CanUSMex Issues, Conspiracy, Corporate Fascism, Editor's Zone, Fascism, Mainstream Mindcontrol Media (M3), NAFTA, North American Union (NAU), Political Zionism

Open Letter to Liberal Leader Stephane Dion

July 26, 2007 by

From: yasch@telus.net
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007
To: Dion.S@parl.gc.ca
Subject: Dear Mr.Dion,

The Hon. Stephane Dion
Leader of the Opposition
House of Commons
Canada

Dear Mr.Dion,

You may have seen about twenty or more posts from me about this and related issues. I know it’s been a little much, but I also know that I reflect the sentiments of many millions of Canadians who will vote based on feelings related to the anxieties exposed in these posts.

I hope that you are fully aware of the issues that are becoming critical to millions of Canadians. No question, their anxieties will grow quickly as activist militants work to expand and deepen the campaign to expose the corporate and political hidden agenda. I have the same anxieties.

The anxiety is not a left or right reaction. It’s Canadian, like Garth Turner, Mel Hurtig, Maude Barlow,and Joe Blow on the street.

It’s a visceral reaction against the all too obvious and brutal aggression by the regime in Washington — global, hemispheric and continental — political, corporate and military aggression.

It’s a Canadian fear of being inexorably absorbed into the USAmerican imperial enterprise, aided and abetted by the present Government of Canada, soul-mates of the present American leadership.
[Read more...]

Filed Under: Canadian Identity/Sovereignty, Canadian Politics, CanUSMex Issues, Editor's Zone, Letters, North American Union (NAU)

MORE RECOLLECTIONS OF AN OLD DOG

April 13, 2007 by


[Editor's Note. Well it appears that Kurt Vonnegut isn't the only old codger who has a thing or two to say about how the world is progressing (or not!) :-) Nonny Moose has a way of putting the b.s. into language that most everyone can understand and appreciate. Many thanks Nonny for your latest revelations on politics and life in general.]
—————-

MORE RECOLLECTIONS OF AN OLD DOG

BY NONNY MOOSE
April 10, 2007

Well, I figured I’d not make any comments before I got a bit of a look at 2007, see if anything looks like it’s changing for the better.

There is one somewhat hopeful sign, and that is all those politicians jumping on the climate change bandwagon. I guess the drastic storms from coast to coast made some citizens take note, and probably a few phone calls were made, and presto subito: even Steven Harper (Steve to you George) sees global warming is real. At least till the next election.

But I have a strange feeling that it is all just for show. For example, when you open the March Issue of Common Ground one of our own BC magazines that has some sensible articles in it, you see on page 13 an article titled “BC’s secret river piracy”, that tells us the sell-out of hydro to private interests is going on apace on the q.t.

It says “On March 22, World Water Day, we need to talk about dividing resources among the populations of Earth as corporations increasingly “buy” public water assets. Canadians are no different from the people of the Congo or Bolivia.” We are not immune to these thefts of our public assets, politely known as privatization, since Prime Minister Mulroney made sure to agree “to a NAFTA provision which included water as a commodity after promising Canadians he would never sign away our water”.

By the way I watched our favourite PM on The Hour recently, where he said of himself that after he stopped being PM he became a Statesman. Isn’t it good to have a positive self image? We’ll all remember him fondly, as our public water flows from corporate taps, and the poor increasingly become the great unwashed.

Somehow I don’t see the gurus of the bottom line becoming stewards of the environment. It just isn’t part of the corporate culture. To change matters, something else than profit would have to be sold to the shareholders. And that is truly difficult. They do need a return on their investment, why else would they be investing, than to enhance their income?
[Read more...]

Filed Under: B.C. Politics, Canadian Identity/Sovereignty, Canadian Politics, CanUSMex Issues, Corporate Fascism, Corporations, Editor's Zone, Environmental Issues, Global Warming, NAFTA, Nonny Moose, North American Union (NAU), U.S. Foreign/Domestic Policies

Documents Reveal Bush/CFR “Administrative Coup D’etat” of America

September 29, 2006 by

Documents Reveal Bush/CFR “Administrative Coup D’etat” of America

Bush ‘super-state’ agenda to create American Union is now official

Steve Watson, Paul Watson & Alex Jones | September 28 2006

Journalist Jerome Corsi has received the first documents pertaining to a FOIA request asking for full disclosure of the SPP office in its activities towards creating a Pan American Union.

According to a report by World Net Daily, the documents reveal that the Bush administration is running a “shadow government” without congressional oversight in conjunction with Canada and Mexico under the guise of a program “to increase security and to enhance prosperity among the three countries through greater cooperation.”

Corsi asserts that a wide range of US administrative law is being re-written in stealth under this program to “integrate” and “harmonize” with administrative law in Mexico and Canada.
[Read more...]

Filed Under: CanUSMex Issues, Editor's Zone, North American Union (NAU)

North American Integration-Another Step Closer

September 29, 2006 by

North American Integration-Another Step Closer

by Bev Collins
Vice-President, Canadian Action Party
bev_collins@hotmail.com

September 27, 2006

While our kids returned to school, there were politicians and business leaders from both sides of the border meeting in Banff to discuss the future of North American Integration.

This high powered meeting was not covered by the mainstream Canadian media, nor the US media for that matter, even though their Defense Minister Donald Rumsfeld and Republican George Schultz were here meeting with our Defense Minister Gordon O’Connor, and our Minister of Public Safety, Stockwell Day as well as many business leaders.

Topics on their agenda were “A Vision for North America”, “A North American Energy Strategy”, “Demographic and Social Dimensions of North American Integration,” “Opportunities for Security Co-operation”.

Meetings like this have been taking place ever since former Prime Minister Paul Martin signed the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America with George Bush, and Vincente Fox in March 2005.

These Chief Executive Officers and their political counterparts are merging our regulations and legislations with that of the USA and Mexico. There are now more than 20 working groups committed to integrating everything from our resources, to our transportation, communication, economy, and military networks and they want it done by 2010.

What will this mean for you as a Canadian? Well you will be giving up your sovereignty as a free and independent country. You will be merged with American and Mexican workers at whatever desired wage and workers rights the business elite deem necessary.

You will be living in a police state, monitored and controlled with your biometric passports. Are you ready for this?

According to experts there is a shadow government that has been established in all three countries that will no longer require elected representatives of the people, as these leaders will take control of all government entities with no accountability to you.

There were Cabinet Ministers, five star generals, and corporate executives in attendance including John Manley, Anne McLellan, Chief of Defense staff Rick Hellier, US Admiral Tim Keating, Tom D’Aquino, and the heads of Lockheed Martin, Chevron and Suncor to name a few.

If this is such a great thing for Canada, why do you not know about it? There has been no input or debate or decision made by our elected parliamentarians. Where do our MP’s stand on this? Are they in favour of integration or will they stand for a sovereign and independent Canada?

Isn’t it time you found out?
———————
Bev Collins
bev_collins@hotmail.com

Filed Under: Canadian Action Party, Canadian Identity/Sovereignty, Canadian Politics, CanUSMex Issues, Editor's Zone, North American Union (NAU)

Harper Not Just Americanizing, But Abolishing Canada

September 27, 2006 by

Harper Not Just Americanizing, But Abolishing Canada

By Susan Thompson

August 31 2006
http://www.vivelecanada.ca/article.php/20060830210915992

For all the continuing concern among Canada’s progressives that Harper is Americanizing this country, it’s unfortunate that there has been silence about the fact that if he has his way, this country as we know it will soon no longer exist.

Plans are on track to establish a North American Union (NAU), a new political and economic entity that would take over governance from the existing countries of Canada, the U.S. and Mexico. This is the actual end goal of “deep integration”, also known as the “Big Idea” or “Grand Bargain”, as has been made clear in publications from Robert Pastor’s book Toward a North American Community to the Council on Foreign Relations’ trilateral task force report “Building a North American Community”.

It doesn’t seem to matter that the Canadian public remains largely unaware of the plan and its consequences. Nor has it been approved by the U.S. Congress; as Republican Congressman Ron Paul has written, “Congressional oversight of what might be one of the most significant developments in recent history is non-existent.

Congress has had no role at all in a ‘dialogue’ that many see as a plan for a North American union”. But political elites in all three countries, in partnership with representatives of giant corporations such as Lockheed Martin, have been working hard to keep making headway despite what the public may think.

In fact, unfortunately, most of the battles have already been won. The steps that have led us down the road towards complete integration with the U.S. have been sometimes slow but still steady since U.S. President Ronald Reagan first spoke about a common North American market back in the early 80s.
[Read more...]

Filed Under: Canadian Identity/Sovereignty, CanUSMex Issues, Editor's Zone

RAISING THE PROFILE ON THE THREAT TO DESTROY THE SOVEREIGNTY OF CANADA, THE USA & MEXICO

September 6, 2006 by

[While this urgent message comes from the States it's obviously directly related to Canada as well. Possibly sovereigntists here in Mooseville could learn from the efforts of our like-minded southern neighbours and get off our complacent asses and start raising a little hell over this issue before, as the Doors singer Jim Morrison once said, "The whole shithouse goes up in flames!". Ed.]
————————

HOW TO RAISE THE PROFILE ON THE THREAT TO DESTROY CANADA, THE USA AND MEXICO PRIOR TO FALL ELECTION

The ruling elite seek to slam Canada, USA, & Mexico together into a planned North American Union, this is right there on http://www.spp.gov for the world to see, but when you try telling most people they just look at us incredulously in disbelief, and say something like “Ah! That will NEVER happen! Thats just conspiracy theory!”

URGE MORE PEOPLE TO SIGN OUR PETITION AGAINST FDA’s TRILATERAL COOPERATION CHARTER (NOW HAS OVER 5,000 Sigs!!)

http://
www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/373269232#body

For Background read “North American Union to Replace USA”?
http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=14965

“Toward a North American Union” by Patrick Wood

http://www.augustreview.com/index.php?module=pagesetter&func=viewpub&tid=4&pid=14

ACT OR BE ACTED UPON- MOVE- ADAPT- OR DIE!

There are two ways we can deal with this situation.

Choice 1: Sit on our hands. Do nothing. Pretend IAHF can do it all without your active involvement. Go into denial and pretend this won’t impact you. Pretend it won’t matter if you are stripped of all civil liberties. Pretend it won’t matter if DSHEA is destroyed along with our nation and CODEX is imposed piecemeal beginning with regional harmonization of the laws.

Choice 2: See what IAHF is doing (below.) Educate yourself, Call, Write, Email everyone you know- family, friends, people in your town, writer letters to the editor, reach out to congressional challengers and urge them to make this issue part of the debates, reach out to members of congress and demand to know their position on the planned destruction of America via the North American Union. Don’t let them try to say its not happening…. see the information below…use it to write letters to your elected officials, to wake up friends and family, to write letters to the editor.

Let IAHF know what you’re doing so we can use your story to inspire others on the IAHF list. Urge more people sign on to the IAHF list. Donate to IAHF to help us get back to DC this fall to continue our campaign against the North American Union and FDA’s Trilateral Cooperation Charter With Canada and Mexico

WHAT IAHF IS DOING

Point Roberts WA has the geographical distinction of being cut off from the rest of the State of Washington, and attached to the BC Canada mainland. As such, we’re uniquely positioned to wake people up on this issue in both the USA and Canada via a Town Meeting which I’m organizing, plan to videotape, and put on the web.

Already I’ve encountered opposition. Thats to be expected! Theres no shortage of fools, neighsayers, and scoffers out there and we must be patient with such people. At present, I’m working to enlist support for this Town Meeting from the Board of the Point Roberts Taxpayers Assn which I’m on. Some on the Board think its “too radical” to try to defend the Constitution, while I say its IMPERATIVE!

You can try to do what I’m doing where YOU live! In fact, you MUST try unless you don’t MIND being completely enslaved. Donations to IAHF will help us return to DC to continue work we conducted in July in your behalf against the FDA’s Trilateral Cooperation Charter- see address at end.

INFORMATION BELOW CAN BE TAPPED FOR WRITING TO CONGRESS, FOR SENDING LETTERS TO THE EDITOR, FOR COMMUNICATING ABOUT THESE THREATS TO FRIENDS, FAMILY, NEIGHBORS- PLEASE TAKE ACTION YOURSELF, _THEN_ FORWARD WIDELY!

Plans Moving Forward to Create a North American Union
Action Central Index
August 29, 2006

Action Alert! Action Alert! Urgent! Urgent! Urgent! Urgent! Urgent!

I know you have fought hard to preserve and protect the freedoms of our beloved nation, the United States.

But I must tell you now that if you and I don’t take immediate, strong action, no other issues will ever matter again because there will not be a United States of America to defend.

Those are not idle words.

I’m sorry to tell you that the Administration of President George W. Bush is moving rapidly, and in secret, to create a North American Union with Mexico and Canada.

The facts cannot be denied.
[Read more...]

Filed Under: CanUSMex Issues, Editor's Zone

U.S.-Mexico merger opposition intensifies

July 10, 2006 by

http://infowars.com/articles/nwo/us_mexico_merger_opposition_intensifies.htm

U.S.-Mexico merger opposition intensifies

Joseph Farah / World Net Daily | July 10 2006

WASHINGTON – Are secret meetings being held between the corporate and
political elites of the U.S., Mexico and Canada to push North America into a
European Union-style merger?

Is President Bush’s reluctance to control the border and enforce laws requiring deportation of foreigners who enter the country illegally part of a master plan to all but eliminate borders between the U.S., Canada and Mexico?

Does the agenda of the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America include a common currency that would scrap the dollar in favor of what some are calling the “amero”?

It may be the biggest story of the 21st century, but few press outlets are telling it. In fact, until very recently, few in the U.S. were aware of the plans and even fewer denouncing what appears to be the implementation of an effort some have characterized as “NAFTA on steroids.”

But opposition is mounting.
[Read more...]

Filed Under: CanUSMex Issues, Editor's Zone