ANOTHER HOLOCOST DENIER (ERIC HUNT) BITES THE DUST By Jim Rizoli & Diane King

ANOTHER HOLOCOST DENIER (Eric Hunt) BITES THE DUST

By Jim Rizoli & Diane King

FIRST EMAIL:

From: Diane King <dianekayking@hotmail.com>
Subject: ANOTHER HOLOCOST DENIER (Eric Hunt) BITES THE DUST
Date: February 15, 2017 at 10:41:59 AM PST

Jim and I have received a response from Eric Hunt about my inquiry: “Did Eric Hunt Write This” and we responded to it. (These letters are in a separate email.) Below are OUR responses to the news of Eric Hunt’s capitulation. Diane

“ERIC HUNT: For over a decade I have devoted a great deal of my life to investigating what is known as “The Holocaust.” I’ve endured 18 months imprisonment, overwhelming hardships, and live life as an outcast due to my activism as a Holocaust skeptic. All along, I claimed I was looking for the truth and out to tell the truth. I have determined I have reached “the end of the line” in the extent relevant research in the central issue of the “Holocaust denial” debate is able to go.”

JIM RIZOLI: Another HoloHoax truther bites the dust….Why are these people retreating from the revisionist camp? Are they being threatened? No matter…..I still will stick to my hardcore revisionist views until I can be proven wrong with FACTS and not just what ifs, and maybes. I notice that this article supposedly by Eric Hunt seems like it came off the skeptics site….maybe they are his new friends.

DIANE KING: I would like to thank Joe Rizoli for finding and sharing this ‘reversal’ and Germar Rudolf for confirming this unexpected issue. (My letter response to Germar Rudolf):

HISTORICAL REVISIONISM

WE ARE A FACT-BASED not a FAITH-BASED movement. Now, I’m a dyed-in-the-wool, 100%, BORN AGAIN BELIEVER – Christian. I wouldn’t say my belief system is based exclusively on faith … OR facts. I believe there are plenty of FACTS to support my faith. There are so many things we CAN’T PROVE in our ‘faith,’ but having come to understand the Lord’s character, I have no problem with my inability to prove everything about GOD.

Having said that, THAT isn’t the way it is in the revisionist world. We springboard FROM the facts and nearly EVERYTHING can be proven. So, I’m appalled at this “bailing” mindset. How can you turn your back on the facts!!!!

It’s like NO ONE has suffered but him. (Not to minimize what he’s been through). MANY soldiers of truth – Germar, Leuchter, Faurisson, Fredrick, Deckert, Fromm – a number of us in lesser AND greater degrees — have suffered too. We haven’t ‘bailed’ on the truth. But bottom line is the facts addressing the specific points concerning the claims of the holohoax are nearly indisputable. So because of this, isn’t this PC-incorrect issue worth fighting for????!!! It’s like he’s been tortured (as it seemed were David Cole and David Irving) until he RECANTED. So once he does, instead of the peace he seeks, he will continue to be hounded to keep him in line.

So what’s he going to do now? More articles denouncing what HE KNOWS is the truth??? Go on the road and try to ingratiate himself back into his tormentor’s good graces? If nothing else, what is going on with Ingrid and Ernst Zundel should prove THERE IS NOT ENOUGH GROVELING you can do – when you resist them, YOU ARE MARKED FOR LIFE.

Jim and I will be pursuing this further (stay tuned for further correspondence).

Eric Hunt’s Kapitulation

Jim and Diane’s Response to Eric Hunt

Dear Eric:

Diane and I collaborated with our response, as this was a big discussion point with us, to make sure the wording and sentiment were precise. This may be long, but we took the time to read yours. You can do us the courtesy of reading ours.

I appreciate your response but you still haven’t proven anything … you sound like you’re coming from the Skeptics (forum) crowd who continue to uphold the Holohoax theories 100?, where not only do they just emote on certain points, but they ridicule and punish counter arguments by censorship. I’m not saying that the National Socialist Germans were angels. I don’t maintain that – it was wartime – but had they wanted to exterminate ANYONE, you KNOW they’d have come up with extremely MORE EFFICIENT means than drafty/questionable facilities using a less than effective agent — Zyklon B. or whatever silly method they say. (By the way, your using the term ‘gassing’ for the means of extermination suggests you’ve bailed on scientific proof.) Have you even considered the other ridiculous methods that were said to have been used? Have you heard about these? Eric do you really believe this below? Have you even read revisionist literature?

Killing methods
Holocaust or Hoax book Jurgen Graf. 55

If we trace the evolution of the Holocaust yarn over the years since 1942, we stumble across one surprise after the other. In particular, innumerable methods of mass killing of which there is not the slightest mention in the later literature, are described in the most graphic detail, particularly:

a) Pneumatic hammers
This method is described as follows in a report of the Polish resistance movement on Auschwitz (23): “When the Kommandos went to work, they led them into the courtyard in the penal company where the executions took place by means of a ‘pneumatic hammer’. They bound the prisoners’ hands together behind their backs and brought them in, one after the other, naked, into the courtyard. They placed them in front of the barrel of an air gun, which was discharged without a sound. The hammer crushed the skull, and the compressed air destroyed the entire brain.”

b) Electric baths
As reported by the Polish resistance movement, the following method was also commonly used in Auschwitz (24): “According to the report of an SS officer, the number of victims in the electrical chambers amounted, unofficially, to 2,500 per night. The executions took place in electrical baths…”

c) Electrical assembly line killing
Another variant was described by Pravda on 2 February, five days after the liberation of Auschwitz: “They (the Germans) opened up the so-called ‘old graves’ in the eastern part of the camp, removed the bodies, and wiped out the trace of the assembly linekilling installation where hundreds of people were killed simultaneously with electrical current.”

d) Atomic bombs
At the Nuremberg Trial, US prosecutor Robert Jackson made the following accusation (25): “A village, a small village was provisionally erected, with temporary structures, and in it approximately 20,000 Jews were put. By means of this newly invented weapon of destruction, these 20,000 people were eradicated almost instantaneously, and in such a way that there was no trace left of them; the explosive used developing temperatures of from four to five hundred degrees Centigrade.”

e) Burning alive
Elie Wiesel, honored with the Nobel Peace Prize in 1986, was interned at Auschwitz from the spring of 1944 until January 1945. In his memoirs of the camp, La Nuit, published in 1958, he never mentions the gas chambers — not once, not with one single word — even though 400,000 Hungarian Jews, among others, are said to have been gassed during his period of internment. (In the German translation, which appeared under the title of Die Nacht zu begraben, Elischa, the gas chambers nevertheless make a miraculous appearance, for the simple reason that, whenever the word “crématoire” appears in the original, the translator has mistranslated it as “Gaskammer”). According to Wiesel, the Jews were exterminated in the following manner (26): “Not far from us blazed flames from a pit, gigantic flames. They were burning something. A lorry drove up to the pit and dumped its load into the pit. They were small children. Babies! Yes, I had seen it, with my own eyes…Children in the flames (is it any wonder, that sleep shuns my eyes since that time?). We went there, too. Somewhat further along, was another, bigger pit, for adults. ‘Father’, I said, ‘if that is so, I wish to wait no longer. I shall throw myself against the electrified barbed wire fence. That is better than lying around in the flames for hours’.” How little Elie survived lying around in the flames for hours, by some miracle, will be revealed below.

f) Steam chambers
In December 1945, at the Nuremberg Trial the following accusation was made regarding the mass killings at Treblinka (27): “All victims had to strip off their clothes and shoes, which were collected afterwards, whereupon all victims, women and children first, were driven into the death chambers… After being filled to capacity, the chambers were hermetically closed and steam was let in. In a few minutes all was over… From reports received may be assumed that several hundred thousands of Jews have been exterminated in Treblinka.”

g) Suffocation by pumping all the air out of the death chambers
This method was described by the Soviet-Jewish writer Vassily Grossman at Treblinka.

h) Quicklime trains
At Belzec the Jews were killed according to eyewitness Jan Karski as follows (29): “The floors of the car had been covered with a thick, white powder. It was quicklime. Quicklime is simply unslaked lime or calcium oxide that has been dehydrated. Anyone who has seen cement being mixed knows what occurs when water is poured on lime. The mixture bubbles and steams as the powder combines with the water, generating a large amount of heat. Here the lime served a double purpose in the Nazi economy of brutality. The moist flesh coming in contact with the lime is rapidly dehydrated and burned. The occupants of the cars would be literally burned to death before long, the flesh eaten from their bones. Thus, the Jews would ‘die in agony'”, fulfilling the promise Himmler had issued “in accord with the will of the Fuehrer”, in Warsaw, in 1942. Secondly, the lime would prevent decomposing bodies from spreading disease. It was efficient and inexpensive – a perfectly chosen agent for their purposes.

It took three hours to fill up the entire train by repetitions of this procedure. It was twilight when the forty six (I counted them) cars were packed. From one end to the other, the train, with its quivering cargo of flesh, seemed to throb, vibrate, rock, and jump as if bewitched. There would be a strangely uniform momentary lull and then, again, the train would begin to moan and sob, wail, and how. Inside the camp a few score dead bodies remained and a few in the final throes of death. German policemen walked around at leisure with smoking guns, pumping bullets into anything that by single motion betrayed an excess of vitality. Soon, not a single one was left alive. In the now quiet camp the only sounds were the inhuman screams that were echoes from the moving train. Then these, too, ceased. All that was now left was the stench of excrement and rotting straw and a queer, sickening, acidulous odour which, I thought, may have come from the quantities of blood that had been let, and with which the ground was stained. As I listened to the dwindling outcries from the train, I thought of the destination toward which it was speeding. My informants had minutes described the entire journey. The train would travel about eighty miles and finally come to a halt in an empty, barren field. Then nothing at all would happen. The train would stand stock-still, patiently waiting until death had penetrated into every corner of its interior. This would take from two to four days.” This Jan Karski was, by the way, appointed to chair a committee for “Scientific Research on the Holocaust” along with Elie Wiesel.

i) Chambers with submergible, electrified flooring. Stefan Szende, a Doctor of Philosophy, describes the extermination of the Jews at Belzec quite differently: “The death factory comprises an area approximately 7 km in diameter… The trains filled with Jews entered a tunnel into the underground rooms of the execution factory… The naked Jews were brought into gigantic halls. Several thousand people at one time could fit into these halls. The halls had no floor. The floor was of metal and was submergible. The floors of these halls, with their thousands of Jews, sank into a basin of water which lay beneath — but only far enough so that the people on the metal plate were not entirely under water. When all the Jews on the metal plate were in the water up to over their hips, electrical current was sent through the water. After a few moments, all the Jews, thousands at once, were dead. Then they raised the metal plate out of the water. On it lay the corpses of the murder victims. Another shock of electrical current was sent through, and the metal plate became a crematory oven, white hot, until all the bodies were burnt to ashes… Each individual train brought three to five thousand, sometimes more, Jews. There were days on which the lines to Belzec supplied twenty or more trains. Modern technology triumphed in the Nazi system. The problem of how to execute millions of people, was solved.”

j) Blood poisoning
This method, described on 7 February 1943 in the New York Times (“… gas chambers and blood poisoning stations which were erected in the rural regions…”), appears to have gone into oblivion as soon as it was invented.

k) Drowning
According to the Israeli Holocaust specialist Yehuda Bauer, the Romanians in Odessa murdered 144,000 Soviet Jews, mostly by drowning (31). The same method of extermination was testified to by the underground press agent for the Warsaw ghetto, as well as for Babi Yar (32): “Not a single Jew remains in Kiev, since the Germans have thrown the entire Jewish population of Kiev into the Dnieper.”

l) Chlorine gas, assembly-line shootings, boiling water, acids
Mass murders with chlorine gas, as well as assembly line shootings were reported for Treblinka (33). Reports of massacres with acids and boiling water round make a complete assortment of killing methods (34).

The exterminationists no longer wish to be reminded of all these stories today. At that time, however, they were considered to be “proven fact” — “proven” by the testimonies of “eyewitnesses” — just like the gas chambers, which have been placed a under legal protection order in several “free democracies”. Not to mention, that as the revisionists assert certain facts, the hoax changes to attempt to address the ‘new’ findings, not the least of which is the diesel to gas discussion (following) again, from Jurgen Graf:

Diesel or gas?

A marvelous metamorphosis is already taking place in the holocaust story. Several leading Holocaust proponents are now taking great pains to drop the Diesel claim and replace it with the view that the engines were not Diesels but conventional gasoline engines which simply burned Diesel fuel, presumably to make the engines more deadly than if they had only burned regular gasoline. This amazing transformation has appeared in a recent book in Germany entitled Nationalsozialistiche Massentötungen durch Giftgas. (fn. 34) The book was a joint project of 24 of the most eminent scholars on the subject, including such notables as Eugen Kogon, Hermann Langbein, Adalbert Rueckerl, Gideon Hausner, Germaine Tillion and Georges Wellers. The book represents the current state of the art of holocaust mythomania and has already been recommended by the World Jewish Congress in London. (fn. 35) The new, “revised” version of the holocaust says, in effect, that Gerstein and others were mistaken when they had claimed that Diesels were used to kill Jews at reblinka, Belzec and Sobibor. The claim now is that gasoline engines were used.

The clumsy juggling of evidence which characterizes this book is exemplified by the fact that although the Gerstein statement refers to Diesel engines four times, the portion of the Gerstein statement which is quoted in this supposedly definitive rebuttal of the revisionists does not mention Diesels at all, nor does it even describe the alleged killing process. (fn. 36) For a description of the killing process that Gerstein supposedly witnessed, the book gives a piece of postwar testimony by Dr. Pfannenstiel in which there is also no mention of the use of Diesels, but only of the use of Diesel fuel in the engine. How one could possibly have operated a gasoline engine with Diesel fuel is, of course, left to the imagination. The fact is that any gasoline engine simply would not operate with Diesel fuel (and vice-versa).

A fatal flaw in the new, non-Diesel, version is the retention of the recurrent claim that the corpses were “blue.” Although any possible death from Diesel exhaust would have been due to lack of oxygen, which would in turn have caused a bluish appearance of the corpse, death from gasoline engine exhaust would “only” have been due to carbon monoxide and could “only” have caused a distinctive “cherry red” or “pink” appearance. Although Pfannenstiel’s postwar testimony is generally less wild than the Gerstein statement, nonetheless he and other “eyewitnesses” also repeated the claim that the corpses were “blue.” (fn. 37)

That the Gerstein statement, although in a severely abbreviated form, is included at all in such a scholarly work, despite the problems for the “revised” version of the holocaust story which should be obvious to anyone looking at the complete text of that statement, only shows how desperate the holocaust scholars are to scrape together everything they have in support of their monstrous fantasy. They have precious little, and the Gerstein statement is still the best evidence they can present.

The new “revised” version of the holocaust story is actually more absurd than the old version. Although it might be remotely possible for an engineer to have mistaken a gasoline engine for a Diesel engine, how could anyone possibly have mistaken “red” for “blue”? Perhaps they were all color blind-we will just have to wait and see. No doubt, we will see many more attempts by desperate men to hold together a crumbling patchwork of lies.

The Diesel gas chamber claim is rubbish-apparently some of the exterminationists themselves recognize that now. However, the alternate claim that gasoline engine exhaust was used instead is rubbish also.

Holohoax museum
https://www.ushmm.org/wlc/mobile/en/article.php?ModuleId=10005220

Snippet…
Belzec, Sobibor, and Treblinka

In 1942, systematic mass killing in stationary gas chambers (with carbon monoxide gas generated by diesel engines) began at Belzec, Sobibor, and Treblinka, all in Poland. As victims were “unloaded” from cattle cars, they were told that they had to be disinfected in “showers.” The Nazi and Ukrainian guards sometimes shouted at and beat the victims, who were ordered to enter the “showers” with raised arms to allow as many people as possible to fit into the gas chambers. The tighter the gas chambers were packed, the faster the victims suffocated.

I hope all that was educational for you for future discussions.

Lets get back to the gassings.

FRED LEUCHTER: Not withstanding the evidence that Irving and Weber, have relative to “Limited Gassings”, The fact remains that Mass Gas Executions are impossible from a hardware standpoint. The evidence cited by both Weber and Irving is circumstantial. I have great respect for circumstantial evidence. It indicates an need for further investigation. This evidence will convince some and not others, and I can respect everyone’s opinion. However, the fact that is impossible from an engineering standpoint to effect Mass Executions with gas is not circumstantial. It is Scientific/Engineering Fact. This should override any doubts created in anyone’s mind about the matter. If anyone is willing to believe “Leuchter” and “Rudolf” some of the time, they should believe all the time. There is not middle ground in Science (Rudolf) and Leuchter (Engineering) …. I have left no room for doubt nor has Germar. (Fred Leuchter).

In complete agreement, the claimed mass extermination could NOT have occurred in ANY venue – because the facts for such are just not there like the solid facts of mass killings in the Reinhardt camps like Treblinka. (On this topic, Both Jim and Diane on separate occasions asked Mark Weber, “How did they do it, how were the killings done in the Reinhardt camps?” To which he responded, “I don’t know.” We learned that David Irving was asked the same thing and he answered, “I don’t know and I don’t care!”) THAT’S A PROBLEM! What kind of answer is “I don’t know?” How about “results are pending” (.LOL) Even some Jews admit there are some issues here.

“Most of the memoirs and reports of Holocaust survivors are full of preposterous verbosity, graphomanic exaggeration, dramatic effects, overestimated self-inflation, dilettante philosophizing, would-be lyricism, unchecked rumors, bias, partisan attacks…” –Samuel Gringauz, “Jewish Social Studies” (New York), January 1950, Vol. 12, p6.

Now, I’m all for open debate but honestly, the stupidity or believing things that are just totally impossible to have occurred, which you seem to now believe …. !!!! You’re a smart guy. But sadly You seem to just parrot the mainstream, PC-driven, mind-numbing, brain dead drivel who make statements without any facts to back up the claims: Saying “it” happened because (all hinging on the trumped-up question) “Where did these people go?” Really now we have to prove that to make our points valid? We don’t have to prove ANYTHING (the accuser must make his case) We just have to show that the official narrative is wrong which I think I’ve done with above comments.

What this is really about?

The Holohoax narrative is operated and controlled by a high-powered CULT, one that wants to USE the Holohoax narrative to control and suppress ALL thought and expression. THEY will decide what WE are to think and express. THEY will determine the parameters of what is acceptable to speak about – their game, their terms – typical CULT behavior and if you question ANY of their tenets, YOU will be dealt with as an apostate, as you have been, as Germar has, Leuchter, Deckart, Faurisson, Toben, Zundel have, to name a few of the many high-profile targets of this cult. And then there are also the low-profile ‘deviants’ (in their mind) like ourselves. So if you think you’re going to get on the fast track and be welcomed again by these people that hate you and what you believe, you better think again.

You think that by taking on this new PC-version of truth, you’re going to be accepted in the Holohoax community? That by ingratiating yourself to THEIR narrative (at least partially) that they will welcome you with open arms or leave you alone? Do you really honestly think that the Holohucksters are going to appreciate you in your back pedaling when you don’t subscribe 100% to THEIR version of the narrative, that you don’t believe in the Six Million!!!??? They still will look at you as a HOLOCAUST DENIER largely because you KNOW that 6 million did NOT die (even with those deaths you claim at Treblinka).

Sorry Eric – ain’t gonna happen. You’re a marked man now just like David Cole, Mark Weber and David Irving? You have joined THEIR dishonorable and even cowardly ranks? The only problem now is people are going to look at you as a sell-out – someone who couldn’t “take the heat,” who sold his soul to the PC devil, if you will. The only good news is your videos have been state of the art and MOST desired and respected and largely, THAT’s how you will be remembered. It’s easy to give in. It’s difficult to HANG TOUGH, which you have done for quite some time. Know this, though, that by caving, whatever you do from now on will be tainted and discounted. We draw the line on your work up to this date, as we have with Weber, Cole and Irving. Are you now going to recant what you have already done and call it wrong, misguided, and not in harmony with the facts?

I just think you’ve been sold a bill of goods and cannot accept the truth that the entire narrative of the Holohoax is a farse because it has cost you to maintain that stance. Why would you capitulate after so many years of ‘hanging tough’!!!! They wear you down? You waved the WHITE FLAG OF SURRENDER/CAPITULATION. You didn’t have to. You now have the option to hang tough or place yourself as a doormat where the HoloHoax Cultmasters can wipe their feet on and claim victory. Is that what you want? Because that is exactly what you will get from them.

I guess there is not much more to say to you….As a final note, and hopefully you will entertain this invitation we’d like to interview you so you can say exactly what your thoughts are so you won’t be misquoted… I’ve interviewed nearly all of the high-profile revisionists and many ‘unsung revisionist heroes’ who have consented to such an interview. We’ll give you your voice, your say and we’ll have a lively debate. Also note, I’m NOT like Ray Dawson, who would hang up on you if he doesn’t like what you say. We look forward to hearing from you about the interview.

ELISABETH CARTO: Eric H’s story can be totally disproved by Walter N. Sanning’s book “The Dissolution of Eastern European Jewry”. The breakdown of individual countries by their Jewish populations, who had a low birthrate in any case, shows that the disabled and children were absorbed into the nearby Jewish Ghettos as in Hungary. They certainly were not killed in gas chambers that did not exist. In 1990/91 Auschwitz had to remove the 6 mil figure from it’s stone monument and changed to 4 mill deaths. There was not ever any word of children being killed there. Actually, there were registered births of babies at the camp hospital. If the book is still in print, readers should buy it. Good luck, Elisabeth Carto

Keine Kapitulation (No Surrender),
(Capitulation is more than surrender, which may suggest ‘mere ceasing hostilities’. Capitulation is GOING OVER TO THEIR SIDE – a worse betrayal).

Jim Rizoli and Diane King
508-872-7292

Young Canadian Truth-revealer Evalion has her You-Tube channel ‘liquidated’ by Joogle’s Zionist-Bolshevik Hate Commissars by KIN KARASIN FOR MAILONLINE

EvalionCensord

Angel-faced Youtuber, 18, is kicked off the site after sharing racist views and singing Happy Birthday to Hitler – with swastika CUPCAKES
By EKIN KARASIN FOR MAILONLINE
PUBLISHED: May 20th, 2016

••• 88 •••

An official YouTube spokesperson said: ‘That channel was terminated by us because it violated policies against hate speech.’

JEWSLOSINGPOSTER

Screen Shot 2016-05-22 at 11.48.15 AM
An 18-year-old woman, known as Evalion (pictured above) was banned from Youtube for posting videos where she praised Hitler and condemned Jews

A racist vlogger has been booted off YouTube after she sang happy birthday to Hitler and called black people ”niggers’ in her videos.

The woman, known as Evalion, caused outrage by calling Hitler a ‘brilliant’ and ‘compassionate man and condemning Jewish people.

Her true identity isn’t known but she is believed to be 18, living in Canada and well spoken.

Evalion’s channel was suspended after a profilic YouTuber, called Leafyishere uploaded a video about her entitled ‘The Most Racist Girl On The Entire internet’.

In Evalion’s videos called Why Hitler Wasn’t Evil and How Feminists Supported Rape by Causing the Migrant Crisis, she shared her support for Hitler.

There was shock when she made swastika cupcakes with birthday candles and sang happy birthday to a picture of the Fuhrer – who was behind the execution of six million Jewish people during the Second World War.

AdolfQuoteImage

Evalion insists that the leader of the Nazis was a good man whilst also admitting to being a Holocaust denier.

The baby-faced blogger is openly anti-Semitic by opening her videos with lines such as ‘Do you despise the Jews as much as I do’ and ‘Do you want to know how to spot a Jew.’

She also went on to use racist language by saying: ‘Don’t you hate those lazy niggers who are never satisfied even after they are given reparations.’

Screen Shot 2016-05-22 at 11.41.13 AM

Evalion caused outrage after she made Swastika cup cakes with birthday candles and sang happy birthday to a picture of Hitler

She also holds contempt for feminists blaming them for the migrant crisis and singling out criticism for Labour MP Jess Phillips.

The banning of Evalion has sparked intense debate on social-media with some people outraged at YouTube’s decision to censor her.

Disturbingly Evalion had over 40,000 subscribers before she was exiled.

One Twitter user called Spanky the Monkey said: ‘If you love free speech, then you have to allow ALL people to speak!’

And @Polite-Critical said: ‘I don’t support what Evalion says, but I defend her right to say it.’

Screen Shot 2016-05-22 at 11.43.06 AM

Teen YouTuber sings happy birthday to Hitler in shock video
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3600710/Angel-faced-youtuber-18-kicked-site-sharing-racist-views-singing-happy-birthday-Hitler-swastika-cupcakes.html#v-7373024103982284359

However other people agreed with the Google owned video platform’s decision.

@HeroticTV said: ‘YouTube has every reason to ban Evalion from YouTube.’

And Craig Ewen added: ‘I think Evalion deserved it. At the end of the day YouTube is a place kids 5+ can go to.’

An official YouTube spokesperson said: ‘That channel was terminated by us because it violated policies against hate speech.’

Young EvalionSpeaks

In Evalion’s videos called ‘Why Hitler Wasn’t Evil’ and ‘How Feminists Supported Rape by Causing the Migrant Crisis’ she describes Adolf Hitler as a ‘brilliant’ and ‘compassionate man’


SOURCE ARTICLE

Mind Pollution: The Jewish Promotion of Sexual Perversion on National TV by Lasha Darkmoon

ATEDITOR0216

[Editor’s Note: There’s a strong possibility that Lasha Darkmoon’s last article (posted here) may be what caused the Jews to take down her website. Exposing the psychopathic sexual perversions of the Jews is not likely something they take lightly. I suggest that readers copy this article and post it elsewhere or simply hang on to it for future reference. Let’s hope and pray that Lasha finds a way to get back into production. It appears that the Jews are now starting to go into attack mode against any website that isn’t directly under their control. I’m hearing from others who are being attacked besides Lasha. A.T.]

****** UPDATE ON LASHA DARKMOON’S SITE. IT’S BACK ONLINE AS OF SUNDAY EVENING MAY 8TH. GOOD NEWS!

Jenji-Kohan-Facebook-image-3-800x445

Mind Pollution: The Jewish Promotion of Sexual Perversion on National TV

May 8, 2016 Lasha Darkmoon

“Fie, fie, fie, pah, pah! — Give me an ounce of civet, good apothecary, to sweeten my imagination.” 

— King Lear, Act 4, Scene 6

jenji-miley-cyrus

Some would argue that this is not about the pollution of minds. They would maintain that there is no deliberate attempt to undermine the morals of a virtuous nation, still less the morals of its innocent minors. It’s more fundamental than that.

This is simply a question, they would point out, of a bunch of dirty-minded writers and degenerate TV executives getting together to produce buckets of sleaze for an increasingly debased public. Depravity, they would tell us, is not being systematically manufactured: it is the natural flatulence of filthy minds. It is the foul atmosphere around us, the very air we breathe. We are filthy, stewed and marinated in filth like dung flies, and filth is what we naturally produce.

Let’s examine this interesting thesis.

—  §  —

Jenji Kohan (b. 1969), a radical feminist and devout follower of Judaism, is  a popular American TV scriptwriter. What I find truly astonishing about this Jewish lady, who enjoys eating Shabbat dinner with her extended family every Friday at her house and attends two different synagogues, is that she has managed to combine religious piety with the promotion of sexual perversion.

She has openly stated on more than one occasion that sexual perversion is normal and healthy. Hence she has no problem promoting it on American TV. After all, if sexual perversion is “good clean fun”, why not spread the happiness around and help nice American families savor the joys of incest, bestiality and other assorted paraphilias?

In a riveting article for the Occidental Observer, Brenton Sanderson explains that Kohan echoes the Freudian argument that “a disposition to perversions is an original and universal disposition of the human sexual instinct.”

Translated into the simplest English: we’re all pervs. Au fond: at bottom, when you strip away all the frills and get down to the nitty-gritty. As for chastity, female modesty, sexual decency, these are all later accretions or artificial developments that violate our essential natures or primitive instincts. A million years ago—when Stone Age humans were grappling with saber-toothed tigers and committing arson by rubbing dry sticks together, and life, according to Thomas Hobbes, was “nasty, brutish and short”—in those long ago times, rape and murder, bestiality and incest, were thrilling everyday events. Ever since then alas, it’s been steadily downhill all the way, until now we have—horror of horrors!—Western civilization.

Thus, in a nutshell,  the philosophy of Freud and his kinky commissars.

In her scripts for American TV, Kohan has no inhibitions about dishing up generous portions of sexual perversion. Incest, for example, is openly (though subtly) promoted by the use of humor. In one episode of her show Weeds, the main character Nancy is shown tearing up nude photos of herself and flushing them down the toilet. This is because she has caught her son Shane masturbating over them. In a prurient 3-minute scene, Nancy is shown lecturing her son on the inadvisability of masturbating over her.

“It’s a little quirky to masturbate over pictures of your mother,” she chides him gently, her voice oozing with sanctimonious concern for his moral welfare. She suggests that it is “possibly” wrong that he should masturbate over his mother’s image, throwing in a trendy reference to the omniscient Freud.

Yes, Papa Sigmund would have understood and offered absolution for her son’s incestuous feelings that are (allegedly) universal. All part of the growing up process, you understand.

Nancy advises her son to continue masturbating by all means but to seek out a more appropriate object for his sexual ardor. Like the girl next door. Or a Playboy model. “It’s nothing terrible or unnatural! Sex is good, Freud said. Or Annie Sprinkle maybe” (re Sprinkle, see my “Sex and the Jews“). But hey, jerking off over his mom,  that’s a bit “quirky”, isn’t it? Mothers, after all, are “possibly” unsuitable objects for filial passion. This all too obvious tongue-in-cheek prurience tries to pass itself off as cutting-edge sociological comment. If you object, you are obviously a Victorian prude.

Hey, lighten up man!—where’s your goddamn sense of humor?

Right. So this is the point we’ve reached. Sons being given pep talks on incestuous masturbation by their mothers is now, on American TV at any rate, a normal, everyday episode in a healthy mother-son relationship. This is something that would have been inconceivable to our Christian ancestors only fifty years ago; and it is still inconceivable in many parts of the world where moral standards have managed to survive and sexual decency is still valued. The scene is played for laughs, and the actress playing Nancy sounds pretty much like Jewish comedienne Sarah Silverman trying her best to keep a straight face as she does a comic skit involving “sexual abuse” of her pet dog, apparently licking her dog’s anus—much to the horror of some passer-by who witnesses the “hilarious scene” and reports it to the cops.

We are clearly expected to view the mother-son incest scene in Kohan’s Weeds in a similarly tolerant, laid-back light. This is meant to be seen as as a touchingly amusing vignette of family life in the early 21st century: an example of quirky, cutting-edge “Jewish humor” at its ribald, irreverent, life-enhancing best.

You don’t have to be a genius to know what is going on here. Sexual perversion is being normalized. And humor is being used as a corrupting agent to make it all seem palatable, trendy and cool. You are made to feel guilty if you don’t find incest funny. And if do find it funny and give way to mirth, you have taken the first step down the slippery slope into degeneracy by trivializing sexual deviance and minimizing its moral turpitude.

In case you don’t believe me, here is the 3-minute Weeds video:

Maybe you found that little scene amusing? Maybe you’re wondering why I’m kicking up such a fuss about what tens of thousands of Americans are likely to find perfectly innocuous.

If so, you are part of the problem. You are not using your imagination. Ask yourself: is this sort of thing fit for family viewing? Imagine a nice American family—father, mother, son, daughter—watching this incest scene after dinner. How do you think the teenage son is going to feel about his mother? I’m willing to bet the entire family will be squirming with embarrassment in their seats, doing their best to hide their blushes.

Two things I can tell you for sure. Firstly, if that family are not acutely embarrassed, they’re abnormal. They’ve already lost the plot. Secondly, if they continue to watch this disgusting filth and chuckle over it like morons, pretending it’s hilarious and groovy. they are past redemption. Hopeless cases. They might as well hang themselves.

As for the guys who run American TV and manufacture this moral halitosis for the masses, they already are dead. They are the Walking Dead. How these people ever got into the topmost echelons of the entertainment industry is a mystery to me.

I guess the devil rules the world and looks after his own.

—  §  —

In the estimation of the Jewish Journal, Kohan is a “provocative, controversial” writer  who has the guts to tackle dark themes and paddle bravely in foul waters. “No topic is too grim,” the Jewish Journal  notes matter-of-factly, “no character too depraved.”

Time magazine is equally complimentary, calling Kohan a “force of nature” and lauding her for her genius in being able to depict shady characters who are “a breathtaking riot of color and [diverse] sexual orientation … characters of all backgrounds who are three-dimensional, flawed and sometimes unpleasant, but always human.” The fact that these breathtakingly colorful characters are also twisted and perverted, infecting the minds of millions with the virus of their depraved values, does not appear to trouble the Time magazine reviewer. He is probably a fellow club member, supping at the same table of tainted meats.

Kohan’s malign influence on American TV can hardly be exaggerated. She is all over the place. She has written numerous TV dramas and comedies, including Sex and the CityGilmore GirlsMad About You, and The Fresh Prince of Bel-Air. Every show mentioned above is a product of the Jewish imagination: Jewish writers, Jewish directors, Jewish producers, Jewish actors. For example, Sex and the City was created by Jewish writer, director and producer Darren Star; Gilmore Girls by Jewish writer, director and producer Andy Sherman; Mad About You by Jewish writer and actor Paul Reiser and Jewish writer and producer Danny Jacobson; and, finally, The Fresh Prince of Bel-Air by Jewish writer and actor Andy Borowitz and his wife Susan Borowitz. (See here.)

If this isn’t Jewish over-representation, what is it? Non-Jewish America is having Jewish values thrust down its collective throat, willy-nilly. It is being permeated, whether it likes it or not, by jüdischer Geist (the “Jewish spirit”).

Not all the shows mentioned above are as subversively kinky as the shows in which Jenji Kohan is personally involved, such as Weeds and Orange is the New Black. It is to be noted, however, that Kohan’s eldest brother David—whom she considers, incidentally, as rather “tame” compared to herself (see below)—has been the single most important influence in America for the promotion of homosexuality on TV. David Kohan was the co-creator and producer of the hugely influential gay-themed sitcom Will & Grace. It was none other than Vice President Joe Biden who in 2013 openly acknowledged David Kohan’s seminal influence in casting a veil of glamor over homosexuality:

“It wasn’t anything we legislatively did,” Biden said. “It was Will & Grace. Literally. That’s what changed peoples’ attitudes. I bet you 85 percent of those changes are a consequence of Jewish leaders in the industry. The influence is immense, the influence is immense.”

Commenting on the point made by Biden, liberal Jewish columnist Jonathan Chait alludes mysteriously to a “vast left-wing conspiracy on your screen,” without bothering to clarify what ethnic group is in the forefront of activating and promoting this “vast left-wing conspiracy.” Agreeing with Biden that Will & Grace was “the single most important driving force in transforming public opinion on the subject [of homosexual relationships]”, Chait adds significantly, driving home the point I am trying to make here:

Think of it from the conservative point of view. Imagine that large chunks of your entertainment mocked your values and even transformed once-uncontroversial beliefs of yours into a kind of bigotry that might be greeted with revulsion. You’d probably be angry, too.

Yes, so don’t blame me if I’m angry. Anger is the only possible reaction to this outrageous onslaught on the traditional values of my Christian ancestors, the values I cherish. For the concerted Jewish attempt to normalize homosexuality, turning what was once widely seen as a mental sickness into a trendy alternative lifestyle, see this excellent article by Brenton Sanderson: “The Indoctrination Game, Part 2: Jewish media influence as decisive in creating a positive culture of homosexuality.”

The ubiquity of Jews in the entertainment industry, as well as their “debauching” influence on the American psyche, has been freely admitted  even by Jewish writers. Thus Adam Garfinkle, Jewish author and founding editor of The American Interest, points out in his 1990 book Jewcentricity:

“It is striking, one has to admit, that the cultural influence of Jews and Jewishness is what it is, considering that fewer than 5 million American Jews are influencing more than 296 million other Americans.” Noting the “increasingly salacious content of mass media”, he adds significantly, “There are Jews at every turn, in marketing, in media, and, of course, in the entertainment business itself. It does not take a rocket scientist to connect the dots: liberals are responsible for the dangerous debauching of our society, not least through vapid entertainment-culture garbage, and a disproportionate number of liberals who are doing precisely that are Jews.” (Emphasis added, quoted here)

It seems nonsensical to assert, in the context of this candid admission by a prominent American Jew that Jews are largely to blame for the corruption of America, that what America needs right now is a greater infusion of “Jewish values”—whatever that’s supposed to mean. And yet this is precisely what Rabbi Shmuley Boteach preaches: that what non-Jewish Americans badly need right now is to be “healed” by the adoption of “Jewish values.”

The rabbi, renowned for his bestselling sex books with flashy titles like The Jewish Guide to Adultery and Kosher Lust: Love Is Not the Answer is precisely the type of rabbi whom Jenji Kohan would enthusiastically endorse. But how their shared “Jewish values” would benefit the rest of non-Jewish America is not altogether clear.

Lust is the pinnacle of holiness,” Rabbi Shmuley pontificates absurdly in one of his popular sex manuals. “If you put love and lust together, love stands no chance.”

Boteach-e1462392217316

SEX-MAD RABBI SHMULEY BOTEACH

“Lust is the pinnacle of holiness.”

I am not aware that even the Talmud says that lust is the pinnacle of holiness. The Old Testament certainly does not. This “philosophy of lust”, if we can call it that, so familiar to readers of the Marquis de Sade, is Kohan’s philosophy too and informs all her thought. Lust runs rampant through her scripts, rearing its head everywhere—even in Christian churches where nuns achieve “the pinnacle of holiness” through fellatio.

In Kohan’s bizarro fantasy world, almost every female in American female prisons—as in Orange is the New Black—is involved in steamy lesbian affairs with other female inmates. Characters take bets to see which of them can seduce the largest number of non-lesbian inmates. Let the camera enter a Christian church, as in Californication, and pan to a nun in her modest clerical robes. In no time at all, this demure devotee of Jesus Christ is shown going down on her knees—not to pray as you might expect—but to dispense oral sex to a stranger who has just dropped into the church to seek help for his sex problems.

The good sister advises him that what he needs is a blowjob. That will cheer him up a bit.

The whole scene is apparently a “fantasy”—which is supposed to make it more acceptable, because it’s not really happening except in the writer’s mind. But why do Jewish writers insist on locating their sexual fantasies—or the sexual fantasies of their characters—in Christian churches rather than in synagogues? I am asking, basically: if you are a Jewish writer, why pick on a Catholic church for a blowjob scene? Why not locate your fantasy in a synagogue? Are we expected to believe that blowjob scenes never take place in synagogues, only in wicked Catholic churches?

This 3-minute video, “A Blowjob in Church”, will show you what is being done to Christian America and its culture by sexually perverted Jewish writers whose fame is out of all proportions to their talents.

Ask yourself: how many sons masturbate over their mother’s nude photos? How many nuns fellate men in Catholic churches? The fact that these images are allowed to fester like poisonous weeds in the rich soil of the mass mind must give us cause for concern. This is mind pollution on a staggering scale.

Here is the illiterate YouTube introduction to this nasty little scene set in a Catholic church: “Church is a holy place for christians (sic) when they confess of sin (sic) not commit sin but in this video you see how the christian actor and actress is (sic) making fun of their own religion. So first look at your own self then blame others ok.”

Beautiful. Talk about sly and sneaky disinformation! The fact that the actor playing the “sinful”  Christian in the scene is in fact a Jew, a debauched looking specimen called David Duchovny (pictured here), is conveniently concealed—apart from the fact that the entire series is a product of the sleazy Jewish imagination: Jewish directors, Jewish producers, Jewish actors, Jewish scriptwriters.

—  §  —

“I want fucking all the time,” Kohan gushes in an interview. “That’s one of my things. We’re all doing it. We’re all thinking about it. We don’t see it enough. It’s hot. I love the sex stuff, and I want more. I love graphic sex, the more sex the better.”  (For more details, see here)

Brenton Sanderson notes:

‘Orange is the New Black’ is an incredibly degenerate show that inverts traditional Western morality and glamorizes homosexuality. The main themes of the show are that committed heterosexual relationships are abnormal and that Christianity is an evil creed….Every woman in the prison, with the exception of the Christian villain, is in a lesbian relationship with one of their fellow inmates — even a nun. Hollywood’s Jewish movers and shakers love to debase Christianity and Catholicism by depicting nuns in sexual roles…. This pornographic debasement of Christian symbols by Jews is a blatant way of defiling Christian culture.” (Emphasis added)

Jewish pornographer Al Goldstein, deceased publisher of Screw magazine, uses almost identical words — see here — so Brenton Sanderson is not saying anything outrageously controversial. He is merely stating the facts. According to one source, Kohan has succeeded in normalizing sexual perversion.

For my part, I find all this kinky sex incomprehensible, given that Kohan claims to be a devout follower of Judaism.

We are told that she had toyed with the idea of becoming a rabbi at one time and now attends two separate synagogues, as I have already noted above. Every Friday Kohan and her extended family have Shabbat dinner together. Her elder brother David, co-creator and producer of the gay-themed NBC sitcom Will & Grace, often attends these semi-religious meals at her house. Kohan dismisses his brand of homosexual humor as too tame for her, explaining, “I was always a little darker.”

She says her pornographic scripts help her to get in touch with her Jewish identity. “For me, the essence of my Judaism is to ask questions. In a way, the show allows me to follow the path of Judaism.”

 

jenji-kohan

JEWISH TV WRITER JENJI KOHAN:

“I want fucking all the time.”

I confess I am at a complete loss to understand any of this. It is totally beyond my comprehension to understand how two allegedly pious Jews, brother and sister, are both regular synagogue attendees and yet earn their respective livings by writing salacious TV scripts that openly promote and seek to normalize sexual perversion.

I can’t help wondering if all this ostensible piety is genuine or just camouflage. Do we really have a nice, synagogue-going lady here, doing her best to access deeper levels of spirituality that allow her “to follow the path of Judaism”, or is all this just cant and sanctimonious twaddle put on for our benefit by a lady who wants “fucking all the time” — a rather pathetic, unattractive, sex-crazed sleazebucket?

It is not for me to judge.

Jenji Kohan and her kind are just the tip of a giant iceberg. They are a small part of a vast underground sewer of filth that befouls the air of American TV — a media empire that now exports its unsavory products to all other parts of the world, infecting the minds of millions in many lands.


user-avatar-pic.php

Lasha Darkmoon

Dr Lasha Darkmoon (b.1978) is an Anglo-American ex-academic with higher degrees in Classics whose political articles and poems have been translated into several languages. Most of her political essays can be found at The Occidental Observer and The TruthSeeker. Her own website, darkmoon.me, is now within the top 1 percent of websites in the world according to the Alexa ranking system.

Jew Tube Censors Brian Ruhe Videos as being “hate speech” A Report from Paul Fromm, Director, Canadian Association for Free Expression

JewTubeCensorsRuheHdr copy

JewTubeNoticeRuhe

Jew Tube Censors Brian Ruhe Videos as being “hate speech”

A Report from Paul Fromm, Director, Canadian Association for Free Expression

CAFELOGOFINAL

Questioning the Hollywood Versions of WW II is ‘Hate Speech’

Prolific Vancouver videographer Brian Ruhe who has done dozens of commentaries questioning the Hollywood version of World War II has  lost a number of teaching positions because of organized Zionist pressure. Now his most recent offering has been scrubbed from You Tube and he’s received a preachy scolding.

His video is ‘inappropriate’ — that vacuous, politically correct term meaning ‘we don’t like it.’

Apparently, his latest video violates ‘community guidelines.” Whose community, one might ask?

“We encourage free speech and defend everyone’s right to express their points of view, even if unpopular. However, YouTube doesn’t allow hate speech.’

Of course, You Tube supports free speech, just not for revisionists. It’s for free speech but not ‘hate speech” and, of course, they’ll decide. Free speech supporters know that ‘hate speech’ is not speech that preaches hate and destruction but speech that some powerful group HATES!

 

Paul Fromm,
Director
CANADIAN ASSOCIATION FOR FREE EXPRESSION (CAFE)