Why? Viva Palestina letter to Charities Commission from George Galloway

Photobucket
http://informationclearinghouse.info/article22412.htm
Why?

Viva Palestina letter to Charities Commission from George Galloway

From: GALLOWAY, George
Sent: 14 April 2009 14:03
Subject: letter concerning viva palestina

By email to louise.edwards@charitycommission.gsi.gov.uk

Hard copy will be sent to:

Louise Edwards
Compliance Investigation Unit (London
Charity Commission Direct
PO Box 1227
Liverpool L69 3UG

To the Charity Commission,

I have been travelling for many weeks in North Africa and the Middle East, Europe, and North America. I have returned to a London address I seldom visit to find a blizzard of correspondence from you. Your correspondence, when read together, as I have just done, seems to represent a wildly disproportionate and inappropriate reaction to our recent delivery of aid to the suffering Palestinians in Gaza, and must raise the question: Why?

The peremptory letters from you, and by you I mean the Charity Commission, are full of bluster and threat, issuing absurd deadlines to people it does not seem to occur to you are not even receiving your letters, either because they are working abroad (Ms Razuki and Mr Al-Mukhtar), travelling abroad on high profile political business (myself), or you are writing to them at the wrong address.

In my own case, Easter Saturday opened with your, latest, threat to go before a High Court judge in a bid to force me to appear before you. That will not be necessary. I look forward to telling you to your faces what I think of you. Which is this.

I have become increasingly concerned about the abuse of your powers displayed in your brazenly obvious political double standards. About your attempts, under the guise of regulating British charities, to police the democratic efforts of political activists in Britain in a way never envisaged by parliament. About your preparedness to waste large sums of public money in political stunts, either at the behest of others or in the hope that you are properly anticipating their wishes. And above all, in the context of this issue, your almost laughably obvious prejudice against the Palestinian cause and against Britain’s two million-strong Muslim community.

Just one example will suffice for now, although I have more, much more.

During Israel’s 22-day attack on virtually defenceless Palestinian civilians in Gaza – condemned by virtually everyone in the world from the United Nations to the Pope and including the British government – an organisation The Zionist Federation took out a full page advert in the Jewish Chronicle on 9th January asking readers to send “care packages” to “our [ie Israeli] soldiers fighting on the front line” in Gaza and to send charity vouchers to a British registered charity Operation Wheelchairs Committee (charity number 263089) for the same purpose.

GazafamilyTerror
Although this was immediately drawn to your attention you appear to have done absolutely nothing at all about such an abuse of charitable status. The Zionist Federation is presumably not a registered charity any more than Viva Palestina was. The Zionist Federation appeal was for money for “care packages” with donations possible online to http://www.zionist.org.uk and to the charity Operation Wheelchairs Committee. By the logic of your actions towards Viva Palestina, surely you should have immediately declared the Zionist Federation to be a charity with all that that entails. But you did not do so. Why? In any case, the Operation Wheelchairs Committee is a charity, soliciting for funds in this advert to support a foreign army involved in a widely condemned military action, in which thousands of civilians were killed, maimed and orphaned. Yet the Charity Commission did nothing. No freezing of bank accounts, no press releases, no carefully briefed “concerns”, no threats of High Court judges.

[Read more...]

The Unveiling of B’nai Brith by William Cooper Part 8 of 8 (Final)

Photobucket
THIS SERIES IS DEDICATED TO CANADIAN PM STEPHEN HARPER IN THE HOPE THAT HE WILL SEE THE LIGHT WITH REGARD TO B’NAI BRITH CANADA, THE JEWISH DEFENSE LEAGUE AND THE REST OF ISRAEL’S FOREIGN LOBBYISTS.

___________________________________________________________________________

ADL/HateCrimesLeg

ADL – DEFENSE ARM OF B’NAI BRITH
——————-

THE AUTHOR
William Cooper
MILTON WILLIAM COOPER
May 6, 1943 – November 5, 2001

[Editor’s Note: William Cooper was murdered by police on November 5th, 2001 at the age of 58. He was an American writer, shortwave broadcaster who came into public awareness in the late 1980s. William was also a radio host, author and political activist known for his best-selling underground book titled Behold A Pale Horse and his worldwide shortwave radio show Hour of the Time. Cooper was also known for his court battle with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and the recorded attempts to dissuade him from pursuing his case.

William Cooper founded Harvest Trust, the CAJI News Service, Veritas newspaper, The Intelligence Service, and Harvest Publications. Under his leadership Harvest Trust ventured into publishing. The first book under the Harvest Trust imprint was Oklahoma City: Day One (ISBN 0-9653307-1-0), by Michele Marie Moore about the Oklahoma City bombing.

An advocate for free radio, Cooper operated the unlicensed Independence Foundation Trust at 101.1 FM in Eagar, Arizona. Cooper claimed to have helped over 700 low power FM affiliate stations get equipped and on the air.

My belief is that Cooper was murdered by the Illuminati because of his work to expose the Beast to the public. This series of talks on B’nai Brith and the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) was part of his work to enlighten the public on who’s who behind the veil. Right at the beginning of this series he makes a comment about just such a scenario arising for many who did what he did. God willing he’ll be the last one to die for such efforts. Bless his soul.

The title of the series on RadicalPress.com is mine. Seeing as the ADL is but an offshoot of B’nai Brith and many people here in Canada think of this organization as B’nai Brith I’ve decided to use it in the title.]

—————————

ADLlogo#8

THE HOUR OF THE TIME
Tape No. 483:  “ADL #8″
Tuesday, November 15, 1994

This broadcast was taken in whole or in part from investigations conducted by the CAJI News Service, and the Intelligence Service, and from reports published by The Executive Intelligence Review entitled “The Ugly Truth About The ADL”, and “Dope Inc.”.

The information in tonight’s broadcast comes from “The Ugly Truth About the ADL”, a report published by the “Executive Intelligence Review”; from “Dope, Incorporated”, published by the editors of the “Executive Intelligence Review”; from the research of the Citizens Agency for Joint Intelligence; and of course, the premiere organization, the Intelligence Service.

Recently, the “San Francisco Chronicle”, ladies and gentlemen, shocked the nation with the revelation that the office of the Anti-Defamation League in San Francisco was at the center of a scandal involving a San Francisco police officer and a Bay Area art dealer–self-described private eye–who were suspected of selling illegally-obtained information to agents of the South African government.

This scandal quickly spread across the nation as it became evident that this was not the only, nor the first, nor does it appear that it will be the last incident of the ADL spying upon American citizens, groups, organizations, churches, and as you will see, many others.

[Read more...]

NEWS RELEASE FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE MARCH 27, 2009 DOUG CHRISTIE & CANADIAN FREE SPEECH LEAGUE STILL AWAITING WORD ON INTERVENOR STATUS IN RADICALPRESS.COM COMPLAINT CASE

hrcscartoon

NEWS  RELEASE
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE MARCH 27, 2009

DOUG CHRISTIE & CANADIAN FREE SPEECH LEAGUE STILL AWAITING WORD ON INTERVENOR STATUS IN RADICALPRESS.COM COMPLAINT CASE

QUESNEL, B.C. – RadicalPress.com Publisher Arthur Topham says Canadian Free Speech lawyer Doug Christie is still awaiting word from the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal as to whether his organization, the Canadian Free Speech League, will be granted intervenor status in the upcoming CHRT hearing involving the controversial Sec. 13 “hate crimes” complaint laid against Topham and his website RadicalPress.com by Victoria, B.C. resident Harry Abrams and his co-complainant the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada (T1360/9008).

Christie first became interested in the case back in February of 2009 and submitted a letter to CHR Tribunal Registry Officer Nancy LaFontant nancy.lafontant@chrt.tcdp.gc.ca stating:

“I am general counsel of the Canadian Free Speech League, and as such I am interested in the case of Arthur Topham. I would like the opportunity to intervene on behalf of the free speech issues raised in this case. We were allowed intervention status in the case of Marc Lemire, and it is our desire to assist in the maintenance of a constitutional challenge to the enabling legislation, as well as to participate in the fact-finding that would be the foundation of such an assessment.”

On March 6, 2009 Christie received a reply from the Tribunal requesting further details as to why he felt he should be granted the opportunity to intervene in the case.

On March 17, 2009 Christie sent a second letter to the Tribunal containing his reasons as set out below:

“Dear Ms. LaFontant:

Re:     Harry Abrams and The League of Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada v. Arthur Topham and RadicalPress.com
Complaint No. : 20071016: Your email of March 6, 2009

The Canadian Free Speech League through its general counsel Douglas Christie has experience in this area beginning with the John Ross Taylor case in the Supreme Court of Canada, the first case of its kind. We seek to intervene to challenge the constitutional validity of section 13(1) of the Canadian Human Rights Act as it now stands amended and as it now applies to the Internet, a medium not considered in the Taylor case.

Our intervention in the case of Marc Lemire before Member Hadjis is still before the Tribunal on reserve. Our position in the Abrams complaint is that it should be adjourned to prevent contradictory rulings at the same level on the constitutional validity of the enabling legislation. In the alternative, a hearing on constitutional validity should be held.

There should be time established to provide notice of constitutional question to the appropriate authority and a hearing date set for expert opinion evidence from both sides.

It would be the position of the Canadian Free Speech League that section 13(1) as now amended constitutes a breach of section 2 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, regarding freedom of expression, section 2(b) and freedom of religion, section 2(a) and should be declared of no force or effect pursuant to section 52 of the Constitution Act of Canada, RSC 1982.

Yours truly,

Douglas H. Christie
General Counsel”

Topham’s case became public in November of 2007 when Abrams and his co-complainant the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada filed a Sec. 13 complaint with the Canadian Human Rights Commission (CHRC) alleging that Topham and RadicalPress.com were promoting “hatred toward Jews and citizens of Israel” because of articles on his website critical of political Zionism and the actions of the foreign Jewish state of Israel.

As Topham stated, “Recent events such as the federal government’s involvement in refusing entry into Canada to MP George Galloway of Britain plus the Jewish Defense League’s smear and intimidation tactics toward anyone supportive of Palestine’s democratically-elected government only further highlight the need for open debate on Israel and its policies without fear of legal reprisal by Zionist lobbyists using the Canadian Human Rights Act’s Section 13 to censor and criminalize dissenting opinions.”

Topham, who also filed a constitutional challenge to this dangerous legislation on March 21, 2009 says, “Douglas Christie’s reasons for wanting to intervene in this case are not only legitimate but paramount to gaining a fair and balanced hearing. If Section 13 isn’t removed from the Act it will continue to increase the already staggering inequities thus far created by its misuse and bring further disgrace and shame upon Canada’s once proud reputation as a free and democratic nation.”

For further information on the complaint:

CHRC Complaint:  http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=821

Response to Complaint: http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=629

CHRC Investigation Report: http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=785

Comment on the Report by RadicalPresss.com: http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=786

                                                                        -30-

CONTACT: Arthur Topham

Email: radical@radicalpress.com

Website: http://www.radicalpress.com

Home: 250-992-3479

Fax: 250-992-8033
———————–