On behalf of my lovely wife Shastah and myself I want to take this moment to thank everyone who made our trip to the 24th annual George Orwell dinner in Victoria, B.C. a reality.

Travel from our relatively remote area of the province to the island is expensive and it was only due to the generosity of those who donated funds that we were able to attend this important gathering of free speech advocates from across Canada.

This was the second time that we were able to enjoy the fellowship of people on the front lines of those fighting to retain the right to speak out their truths in the face of a brutal and alarmingly dangerous force: the government of Canada and its bureaucratic agent known as the Canadian Human Rights Commission (CHRC).

Due to time restrictions at the moment I cannot elaborate on the meeting but will do so over the next while.

Arthur Topham

Pub/Ed

RadicalPress.com

September 5, 2009

FROM THE EDITOR’S DESK:

RADICAL EDITOR & PUBLISHER ARTHUR TOPHAM
__________________________________________________

Dear Radical Reader,

The recent and still very provocative ruling by Canadian Human Rights Tribunal Member Athanasios Hadjis on September 2, 2009, (the Lemire Decision) – one that holds great promise of finally bringing down the massive house of cards better known as the Canadian Human Rights Commission – has finally freed up at least one of countless mainstream media online news service agencies, allowing them the much needed freedom to give some long sought coverage to the CHRC’s “hate crime” complaint case involving Harry Abrams and the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada v. Arthur Topham and RadicalPress.com.

As the Editor and Publisher of RadicalPress.com I must gratefully and gleefully take off my hat to Merv Richie, publisher and owner of the Terrace Daily.ca, an online news service located in the northwestern community of Terrace, British Columbia, Canada and extend a firm handshake to him and say thank you for having both the wisdom and the courage to do what the rest of Canada’s supposedly independent and objective news media should have done two years ago when this controversial case first became public.

I had long hoped that my own community newspaper, the Quesnel Cariboo Observer, would have been the one to have broke the story but after initially covering the issue back in early 2008 they were immediately silenced by a false threat of a law suit from the very personage who now appears to have lost his case against against Marc Lemire in this outstanding ruling – none other than Richard Warman, good friend of Harry Abrams the Complainant who laid the infamous sec. 13(1) “hate crime” charge against myself and my website back in July of 2007.

While this important ruling is the first major step in the eventual dismantling of this quasi-judicial internal censorship syndicate created by the Zionist lobby groups currently permeating all aspects of Canadian government, industry, media and academia it isn’t the final end for this vile, draconian sec. 13(1) anti-free speech law. As I recently wrote to one email correspondent regarding this issue, “When one is dealing with a deadly serpent it’s best not to take your attention off it until its head is severed from its body. In my case the head of this viper is still very much intact.”

Mr. Merv Richie has done a great service for everyone who believes in our Charter rights to freedom of expression and freedom of the press and he deserves a round of applause and encouragement for his willingness to put his shoulder to wheel at a time when this vehicle of expression is only just beginning to budge out from the Stalinist rut it’s been stuck in for the past twenty odd years. Please do write to him and thank him and pass this article to all you can.

Shine your Light for Love, Peace & Justice for All,

Arthur Topham
Publisher/Editor
The Radical Press
Canada’s Radical News Network
“Digging to the root of the issues since 1998″
http://www.radicalpress.com
radical@radicalpress.com
——————————

http://www.terracedaily.ca/show4688a/STUNNING_VICTORY_FOR_FREEDOM_OF_SPEECH
STUNNING VICTORY FOR FREEDOM OF SPEECH
by Merv Ritchie

2nd September 2009

This morning a new light shines across Canada. The Canadian Human Rights Tribunal (CHRT) has had its fangs trimmed. Section 13, the law that prohibits speaking openly about uncomfortable truths has finally been defeated. Commonly referred to as the anti hate law it has been used to stifle criticism of policy and ideology on almost every medium. The first use of the law was to force a man, John Ross Taylor, to stop using his own personal telephone answering machine to leave messages for people that wanted to call in and hear what he had to say. Generally his thoughts were against Canada’s immigration laws. The latest use of the law was to charge a man, Marc Lemire, who ran an internet chat forum. Although he did not approve postings to the message board (it was an open message forum) he was held to account for what others posted.

A BC website (operated by a former Kitimat native) is also currently under indictment by the CHRT for criticizing an ultra right wing faction of Israeli/Jewish politics called Zionists. Many do not like Arthur Topham’s blunt, unorthodox, politically incorrect writings on his website, Radicalpress.com, however he provides evidence and background to back up everything he writes. Truth is not a defence against the CHRT as every person and organization that has come under their radar has discovered, as they all were convicted. That is a 100 percent prosecutorial success rate, a rate unheard of anywhere in the world except in this secretive organization that has recently been investigated by the RCMP.

In his decision Athanasios D. Hadjis set a very high bar for new prosecutions under this act. Only the most vile and alarmist writings should be considered for prosecutions and the Charter of Rights and Freedoms protects Canadians, allows Canadians, to discuss issues that are not politically correct. The conclusion is as follows;

V. CONCLUSION
I have determined that Mr. Lemire contravened s. 13 of the Act in only one of the instances alleged by Mr. Warman, namely the AIDS Secrets article. However, I have also concluded that s. 13(1) in conjunction with ss. 54(1) and (1.1) are inconsistent with s. 2(b) of the Charter, which guarantees the freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression. The restriction imposed by these provisions is not a reasonable limit within the meaning of s. 1 of the Charter. Since a formal declaration of invalidity is not a remedy available to the Tribunal (see Cuddy Chicks Ltd. V. Ontario (Labour Relations Board), [1991] 2 S.C.R. 5), I will simply refuse to apply these provisions for the purposes of the complaint against Mr. Lemire and I will not issue any remedial order against him (see Nova Scotia (Workers’ Compensation Board) v. Martin, 2003 SCC 54 at paras. 26-7).

His comments on the AIDS Secret article in part are as follows;

In my view, the material found in the AIDS Secrets article expresses unusually strong and deep-felt emotions of detestation and vilification towards homosexuals in particular. The article is rife with hyperbole and moral condemnation. Homosexuals, and Blacks to a lesser extent, are denigrated as purveyors of a “killer” that is on the loose, agonizingly destroying the lives of American children and adults alike. Extreme language is used to vilify them and their lifestyles. They are portrayed as a powerful force that is conspiring to bring harm to others. Rather than using the statistics and studies in a dispassionately scientific manner, the article adopts an alarmist, almost hysteric tone, which along the above mentioned characterizations, is likely to expose them to hatred or contempt.

This is a very dramatic shift in the manner in which Canadians might discuss issues. It allows for a much greater freedom to engage in discussions. It also has very profound impacts on internet websites and forums.

Although Mr. Lemire did not compose the AIDS Secrets article he allowed it to be posted on his website and therefore was found responsible for distributing this material.

The conclusion found Section 13 to be at odds with the Charter of Rights. The next few weeks and months will determine the future of the CHRT. It has caused much grief for many individuals who wanted to expose some knowledge they discovered to the general public. Today a fresh wind of freedom to speak out has blown across Canada.
———–

Also see the following: Two of your articles are posted on our site here. Merv.

http://www.terracedaily.ca/show13s/PROVOCATIVE

—————–

Arthur Topham is the Publisher and Editor of RadicalPress.com. He is currently involved in a free speech battle with the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada.

He is also in extremely dire need of financial support to sustain this battle with the forces of repression and censorship as he is not able to work during this period of intense litigation with the Canadian Human Rights Commission and the CHR Tribunal. Any donations therefore would be most welcome. Please see the following url on the Home Page (upper right hand corner) http://www.radicalpress.com/?page_id=657 regarding donations. Also there is a “DONATE” button there for Paypal or here at https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=4466120 . Feel free to use any of them if you can help out. Thanks.

Arthur welcomes all feedback to his articles and can be reached at radical@radicalpress.com .

For the Full Monty on the complaint case involving RadicalPress.com and B’nai Brith Canada please see: http://www.radicalpress.com/?page_id=995

Canadian Human Rights Tribunal rules that Sec. 13 “Hate Law” is Unconstitutional

September 2, 2009
RadicalNewsNetwork

Dear Radical Reader,

Prior to my comments I first want to take the time to say thank you to Mr. Marc Lemire, the man who has been at the forefront of the battle for Internet Freedom in Canada over the past six years. Persevering and remaining steadfast in his convictions through thick and thin and suffering endless slings and arrows of accusative epithets and accusations of every conceivable nature. Along with him was his steadfast and cool lawyer Barbara Kulaszka and his comrades in arms Mr. Paul Fromm of the Canadian Association for Free Expression (CAFE) and of course Canada’s and the world’s No. 1 Freedom of Speech fighting lawyer Mr. Douglas Christie all pictured together in their famous INTERNET FREEDOM DEFENCE TEAM photo below. Every freedom loving Canadian who values their basic right to express themselves on paper or on the Internet owes this magnificent and dedicated crew of conscientious, responsible citizens a debt of gratitude.

In terms of Canada’s struggle to retain its Constitutional rights as contained in the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, September 2, 2009, may go down in Canadian history as the day that the citizens who believe in freedom of speech finally managed to throw a monkey-wrench into the gears of the Zionist Censorship Juggernaut that has been rolling relentlessly over our rights and freedoms for the past half a century.

At 9:30 EST the Decision in the long-awaited section 13 “hate crimes” complaint Warman v. Lemire finally appeared on the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal’s website http://chrt-tcdp.gc.ca/aspinc/search/vhtml-eng.asp?doid=981&lg=_e&isruling=0 . The gist of the ruling by Tribunal Member Athanasios D. Hadjis respecting the manner in which this controversial law was used in the six year long trial of Marc Lemire for allegedly posting “hate” materials is contained in my Motion to the Tribunal (see below) which I sent off today after receiving word of the Decision.

But lest readers jump to the conclusion that this means the end of this draconian law designed to silence any and all criticism of Israel or political Zionism please be advised that while it is truly a decisive victory in terms of the battle being waged to rid this country of sec. 13(1) it doesn’t automatically mean that the war itself has been won.

(more…)

Is Your Government Breeding Bolsheviks?
B’nai Brith’s brazen attempt to hardwire Hatred and Censorship into the Canadian Psyche

By Arthur Topham

August 8, 2009

In his 2006 book, The Synagogue of Satan, the British writer Andrew C. Hitchcock has a lot to say about the house of Rothschild. In fact his book is a revelation of our times; the chronology of a crime syndicate that began in 1760 when Mayer Amschel Bauer took over his father’s money lending business in Frankfurt, Germany and changed his name from Bauer to Rothschild, a German word meaning “Red Shield” and hung the symbolic hexagram that now adorns the Israeli flag above his door.

The last 250 years is basically a record of the Rothschild’s devastating effects upon the people and the planet; one that has now brought our 20th Century civilization to the brink of either global disaster, or, should we awake in time to this imminent end and act accordingly, the final dismantling and dissolution of this infamous house of hell that’s been the root cause of humanity’s discontent for the past two and a half centuries.

Andrew Hitchcock’s book[1] in some respects parallel’s the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion in that it too is a road map like the Protocols only one that can lead us out of the wasteland of the present times rather than further into a gloomy and foreboding Big Brother future such as the Protocols reveal.

While Hitchcock’s first and foremost purpose is to document the accomplished deeds of this Rothschild house of horror as they pertain to global finance, politics and media, his particular expose of the secret masonic society of B’nai Brith, one of the many Rothschild enterprises designed to assist in its agenda for world domination, should be of special interest to Canadians; especially those Canadians who have managed to break free to some degree from the mind-numbing influence of the Rothschild controlled mainstream media and are relatively able to view, somewhat objectively, the ongoing machinations of this organization; one initially set up and funded in order to present to the world a viewpoint fundamentally Talmudic, cabalistic and atheistic in scope, nature and purpose.

In the USA when Americans think of B’nai Brith they automatically think of the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) the now powerful, aggressive arm of B’nai Brith International originally formed in 1913 by the Rothschild Jews in reaction to a Jewish business man who was convicted of raping and murdering one of his young employees and actually put in jail for his crime.* This was considered an outrage by the then nascent Zionists and so they conspired to come up with an organization that would eventually become the Goliath of gutter journalism, spewing forth volumes of vituperative slander and malignant lies upon any individual, group or organization that ever dared to challenge the tendentious tenets of the Rothschild empire.

I believe Noam Chomsky, Professor of Linguistics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, put it rather succinctly when he once described the ADL as “…one of the ugliest, most powerful pressure groups in the U.S…. Its primary commitment is to use any technique, however dishonest and disgraceful, in order to defame and silence and destroy anybody who dares to criticize the Holy State (’Israel’).”

(more…)

JAMES MARSH - ILLUSTRATOR

Dear Radical Reader,

On March 28th of this year (2009) I received a short email from Byron Prior, an associate out in Newfoundland, who I have been in email contact with for a number of years. His case, as explained in the websites listed in his email below, is most likely one of the best examples of the power of the provincial and federal courts, aided and abetted by a complicit media, to shield themselves and their political cohorts from the scrutiny of public investigation. Byron’s case is a classic, albeit a relatively unknown one, that epitomizes the level of corruption which exists within Canada’s politically biased judicial system and how that system becomes criminal itself in its overt and covert methodologies used to shield the perpetrators of sexual abuse. When people of power are accused of wrongdoing and there is good reason for inquiries to be held then those in such positions exploit their influence for their own self-serving benefit and to the detriment of our justice system as a whole.

Byron Prior’s case, like my own fight with B’nai Brith Canada and the Canadian Human Rights Commission, is purposely kept hidden in the twilight and shadows constructed by the Zionist-controlled mainstream media. Our situations are quite different in terms of the underlying reasons for the persecutions we face but the fact that the system itself is abusing us both is beyond question. In my case the “crime” is speaking the truth as I see it about the Rothschild Zionist global conspiracy. In Byron’s case the circumstances are far beyond anything so threatening as the intellectual attack that I am being subjected to by the state and its Zionist manipulators. His story is a macabre horror story compared to my own, the details of which would provide ample subject matter for a full length documentary. The reaction, by Canada’s legal system, to his noble and sincere efforts to gain both recognition and justice are frightening and ominous.

Please take the time to read through the information provided to me by Byron prior to his capture and afterward by his wife Audrey who is doing her best to bring this story out to the public in the hope that her husband will be treated with respect and dignity.

To be witness to this case is to feel the shame and the infamy of living in a nation thus corrupted. It’s but another stone being rolled back from a tomb containing the dry, dusty bones of a legal system as perverted as those who fill the abusive roles within this sorry and tragedy drama.

On July 24, 2009 I received the following email from Byron’s wife Audrey regarding the latest developments in his ongoing case:

“Byron had court again on Monday, July 20, 2008. They had Dr. Semple from Ontario there to testify in the morning and then in the afternoon the lawyers did their final arguments and then the judge gave his final decision. He went with the report from Dr. Craig here in St. John’s saying that Byron was delusional, rather than the report from 5 doctors from Ontario, and had him committed to the Waterford Mental Hospital where he is to have more assessments done by the board. He is to stay in a locked ward at the Waterford while this is being done. It has to be done within 90 days. He can have visitors, immediate family only, on Thursdays and Sundays from 2:00 to 4:30.

For your info,

Audrey
Wife”

What I found the most disconcerting about Audrey Prior’s message was the fact that the following detailed assessment of Byron’s mental health (see below) was dismissed as irrelevant and instead the blatantly suspect and cursory report by Dr. Craig automatically accepted.

Please pass this on to anyone who might be willing to further assist these folks.

Sincerely,

Arthur Topham
Pub/Ed
RadicalPress.com
——————–

On 3/28/09 3:46 PM, “Byron Prior” wrote to RadicalPress.com:

My family was destroyed as young children by Incest, Child Rape and Abuse of every kind in a small town of 2500 people. Supreme Court Judges, Politicians and RCMP are involved and in a position of “Conflict of Interest” and pay a hooker and her mother to keep quiet in this case in Newfoundland. Their names and why are evident on Harriett’s Customer List at this Website: http://maxpages.com/sexualabuse  &  http:www.youtube.com/cdnjusticedelayed

Before our Premier Danny Williams entered Politics, he and his Law Firm represented me, when he was elected his Firm returned my File and wished me Good Luck finding another Lawyer. No-one in Newfoundland will represent me since and the last Lawyer I asked told me, If any lawyer in Newfoundland represents you, it will be the last job they do in this province. Newfoundland.

(more…)

Tzar Nicholas II and his family. The Tzar acted constitutionally and abdicated on March 5, 1917. He and his family were kept prisoner at Tobolsk and guarded by a Russian commandant and Russian guards. In April, 1918, after the Jewish regime gained controlled, he was transferred along with his family from Moscow to Ekaterinburg in the Urals. All the Russians were replaced by Bolshevik Jew Cheka members who, on July 16, 1918, woke the Tzar and his family and took them into the basement and shot and bayoneted them and then took the bodies to a disused iron pit and and cut them up and burned them and then dissolved the parts with 400 lbs of sulphuric acid. Afterwards the ashes and fragments were thrown down a mine shaft and covered up. Thanks to the fact that the White Armies captured Ekaterinburg the truth was found out.
______________________________________________________________________
The Seven Pillars of Zionist Subterfuge
by Arthur Topham
July 5, 2009

Preface

The struggle for freedom of speech in Canada continues. It’s has now been over 19 months since the Zionist organization nominally referred to as B’nai Brith Canada registered a formal complaint with the Canadian Human Rights Commission, the premise of which was the contention that I and my website RadicalPress.com were contriving to promote ongoing hatred affecting persons identifiable as Jews and/or as citizens of Israel.

Since that day back on November 20, 2007 it has been a continuous gong show of legal assaults in one form or another directed toward myself; first coming from the Commission and then, after they decided the case warranted proceeding to the next stage, from the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal, all seemingly in tandem with the Complainants’ own submissions.

Whenever I submit a document or letter or make a motion in my own defense the immediate reaction is to be met with counter arguments and legalese from either Mr. Daniel Poulin, counsel for the Commission or Marvin Kurz, of the law offices of Dale, Streiman & Kurz of Brampton, Ontario. Kurz of course is a longstanding member of this Rothschild created secret society known as the Independent Order of B’nai Brith and is also head counsel for the Canadian branch of B’nai Brith International better known to the public as simply B’nai Brith Canada. Kurz is representing the two B’nai Brith Canada executive members, Harry Abrams and Anita Bromberg, who laid the complaint against me and my website.

As is standard practice with the Zionists, whenever it comes to attempts to silence dissenting opinions, they do their damnedest to discredit whomever they are out to censor. In my case they attempt to do it via legal channels and throwing every bit of muddy legal “precedent” that they can dig up at both me and the (theoretically independent) Tribunal in order to get the Tribunal to rule on inapplicable case law that would prevent me from presenting the overwhelming evidence which now exists that refutes all of their worn-out allegations of “anti-Semitism” and “racism” and “hate-monger” and which also conclusively shows that Israel is, in fact, a racist, terrorist, apartheid state and likely the most undemocratic nation in the world of those who profess to be such.

As such their latest attempt to have the Tribunal lend its quasi-judicial ear to the seven points contained within their June 23, 2009 letter to the Tribunal represents in some ways an indication of their desperation in trying to stop the flow of information that counters all of their propaganda concerning both political Zionism and the actual politics of the state of Israel.

Employing the legal procedure known as “Judicial Notice” which Black’s Law Dictionary defines as, “The act by which a court, in conducting a trial, or framing its decision, will, of its own motion, and without the production of evidence, recognize the existence and truth of certain facts, having a bearing on the controversy at bar, which, from their nature, are not properly the subject of testimony, or which are universally regarded as established by common notoriety, e.g., the laws of the state, international law, historical events, the constitution and course of nature, main geographical features, etc.” the Complainants are attempting to convince the Tribunal that all of their standard Zionist propaganda which has been forced upon the general public over the past century by a compliant, controlled Zionist media, must now be recognized as being universally accepted as fact.

As far as chutzpah goes this latest move on their part has to be considered as one of the more blatant examples of arrogance and chauvinism to ever have been offered up for public consumption.

The substance of the article below is therefore my (relatively) short response to the seven points they have submitted to the Tribunal. Bear in mind as well that the whole issue of section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act is, in essence, tied directly to this latest ploy by the Zionists. In keeping with a semblance of literary flavour in all of these otherwise dry and dusty proceedings I’ve chosen to refer to the seven points as the seven pillars of Zionist subterfuge.
—————

(more…)

[Editor’s Note: Just after the hearing process proceeded I received a copy of a manual for the parties involved in the case. It was called What Happen’s Next? A Guide to the Tribunal process. Under the heading of Statement of Particulars it reads:

“A statement of particulars is a description of the material facts that the party seeks to prove in support of his or her case, the party’s position on the legal issues being raised and the remedy being sought…. The statement of particulars should also include a list of relevant documents in the party’s  possession ….”

What is contained below are the two salient sections dealing with the “Issues” and the “Remedies Sought” which compose the main portion of my Statement of Particulars sent to the Tribunal on June 16, 2009. Basically they outline the arguments which I intend to pursue in the upcoming hearing.

Since sending it off I have received two responses to it from the Complainants Harry Abrams and Anita Bromberg of B’nai Brith Canada the second being an amended version of the first. I will be posted their reply separately along with comments.]

Harry Abrams

and

The League For Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada

v.

Arthur Topham

and

RADICALPRESS.com

File Number: T1360/9008

STATEMENT OF PARTICULARS

June 16, 2009

Arthur Topham
Pub/Ed
The Radical Press
4633 Barkerville Hwy
Quesnel, B.C. V2J 6T8
Email: radical@radicalpress.com

June 16,  2009

Nancy Lafontant
Registry Officer
Canadian Human Rights Tribunal
Nancy.Lafontant@chrt-tcdp.gc.ca

Dear Nancy Lafontant,

RE: Harry Abrams and the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada v. Arthur Topham and the RadicalPress.com
File Number: T1360/9008

Please find enclosed my Statement of Particulars including the Issues, Venue Location and Remedies Sought in the above case.

The Corpus of Relevant Documents, due to their volume, are included in the CDs being sent off to the parties today via Canada Post.

If there is any further formality that you require, please let me know as soon as possible.

Sincerely,

Arthur Topham pro se
Publisher/Editor
The RadicalPress.com

Cc:
Anita Bromberg, Co-complainant
Marvin Kurz, Complainant Counsel
Harry Abrams, Complainant
Daniel Poulin, Commission counsel
Douglas Christie, Intervenor, Canadian Free Speech League
CHRC, National Office

Issues

42.  This case raises several crucial issues but first and foremost of them all is one of primary, critical and fundamental import in need of special address, clarification, understanding and ultimately, redress; not only by the Tribunal and the Commission but also by the general public, our social and cultural institutions, our political leaders and governments at all levels. It is the urgent need for the conscious awareness and recognition of the willful creation and ongoing deception manifesting as the incessant, erroneous promulgation of the idea or concept of what the Zionist Jews and their misinformed, duped supporters term “hatred.”  This deliberate, ongoing manufacture of a myth of hate; this intentional, debilitating deceit of fabricating the false, misleading and enormous belief or misconception that the Jewish community, or any ethnic community in Canada, is somehow in imminent danger due to the twin falsehoods of “hatred” and “contempt,” accompanied, as always, by their crippled cousin “anti-Semitism,” has been an ongoing, historic attribute of the Zionist agenda of disinformation and division amongst democratic nations since the inception of the World Zionist Organization in 1897; one which, I submit, set the pace for Zionism’s relentless attack upon Western civilization throughout the 20th Century and into the present one. It is the basis upon which all efforts to destroy freedom of speech in Canada are dependent and the prelude to efforts at creating a one world totalitarian government.

(more…)

“KAYJAY” THE TRIBUNAL KANGAROO PONDERING POULIN’S
PLEA  TO DISMISS TOPHAM’S MOTIONS AS BEING “GROUNDLESS”
AND “VEXATIOUS”
__________________________________________________________________

[Editor’s Note: The sound of kangaroos ruminating fills the air these days as the Show Trial of 2009 continues to unfold in parts of the blogosphere and on the alternative media sites around the world.

Not to be outdone by James von Brunn’s grand-standing attack at the Holy Hoax museum in Washington, DC, RadicalPress.com publisher and editor (moi) continues to challenge the forces of evil and repression and media censorship and mind-control.

The following letter to the parties involved in this censorship, Section 13(1) attack upon Free Speech serves to show the inequities of the present Human Rights Commissions and how they are as lop-sided as a kangaroo’s ear when it comes to distinguishing between threats of violence and intellectual exercises in the realm of politics.

As this “hearing” process continues to unfold I’ve tried my utmost to record and publish every bit of information connected to it so as to provide the reader public with an ongoing overview of just how these folks operate when they try to accuse and convict a critic of Israel and of political Zionism of being a rabid hatemonger and an anti-Jewite. God willing it may help others who may become ensnarled in the Section 13 gulag known as the Canadian Human Wrongs Act.

Please pass this on to others and please help out with a donation of coin if you can. See the top right hand corner of the home page for further instructions.]

——–

RE: MOTION TO RECONSIDER RE: JUNE 2, 2009 TRIBUNAL DECISION (2) TO ALLOW THE CHRC TO ALTER EVIDENCE IN THEIR STATEMENT OF PARTICULARS

BY EMAIL

Arthur Topham
Pub/Ed
The Radical Press
Box 4633 Barkerville Hwy
Quesnel, B.C. V2J 6T8
Email: radical@radicalpress.com

June 12,  2009

Nancy Lafontant
Registry Officer
Canadian Human Rights Tribunal
Nancy.Lafontant@chrt-tcdp.gc.ca

Dear Nancy Lafontant,

RE: Harry Abrams and the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada v. Arthur Topham and the RadicalPress.com

File Number: T1360/9008

I am in receipt of both Daniel Poulin’s reply of June 10, 2009 on behalf of the Commission, and that of Marvin Kurz, of June 11, 2009 on behalf of B’nai Brith regarding my June 10, 2009 MOTION TO RECONSIDER RE: JUNE 2, 2009 TRIBUNAL DECISION (2) TO ALLOW THE CHRC TO ALTER EVIDENCE IN THEIR STATEMENT OF PARTICULARS.

It is my position that counsel for both parties are rashly concluding that this motion, as well as previous ones, rather than being given due consideration by the Tribunal based upon the arguments and evidence contained therein, be merely viewed as “vexatious” and “frivolous” and that, further, because of this assumption on their part, we (meaning myself and RadicalPress.com as Respondent) and they (the Commission and the Complainants”), are in “alternative realities” respecting the issues at hand (the latter comment being Mr. Kurz’s).

The accusation that this motion is “vexatious” and “frivolous” and simply an annoying ploy to stymie the process, plus the further accusation of Mr. Kurz that the Respondent and the Commission/Complainants are in “alternative realities,” require further comment.

Based upon the positions taken by Mr. Poulin and Mr. Kurz, it is highly evident that they are concomitantly committed to abusing the legal process within which the Commission and the Tribunal operate in order to satisfy their mutual design of downplaying the importance of following proper procedure and keeping within the parameters of the real legal system which they are attempting, rather poorly, to mimic, in accordance with their own questionable objectives.

Mr. Kurz’s comments in this context do reflect the fact that on the question of correct adherence to jurisprudence, we are living in “alternative realities.” As such, what we are witnessing here, in these rather quick, ejaculatory comments on their part, is the fact that Mr. Kurz and the Complainants (and the Commission, by default) are not only out of touch with the reality in which I am present and function in but also the reality in which their own superiors live and operate.

In this regard I would further draw Mr. Poulin’s, Mr. Kurz’s, Ms Bromberg’s, Mr. Abrams’, the Commission’s and the Tribunal’s attention to the remarkable statement released yesterday by Frank Dimant, B’Nai Brith Canada’s executive vice president, as quoted by the Ottawa Citizen on June 11, 2009, and available for verification at
http://www.ottawacitizen.com/news/Rights+commission+rejects+call+quit+policing+online+hate/1686720/story.html

           FRANK DIMANT - BBC VP
________________________________________

In that article entitled, “Rights commission rejects call to quit policing online hate” Frank Dimant unequivocally stated, regarding Section 13 of the CHRA, that:

“What the Commission is recommending is, in essence, cosmetic tinkering to deal with a human rights system that is in need of a major overhaul “

A clear reading of this article illustrates the very points which I am arguing in this complaint: that the abuse of justice and the divergence from any principle even closely resembling human or civil rights, as applied in s. 13 cases, are so blatantly obvious that even the executive level of the Complainant’s organization, B’nai Brith Canada has come out publicly calling for a major overhaul.

My motions for disclosure of documents and correct presentation of evidence, referenced and commented upon in the responses by Mr. Poulin and Mr. Kurtz, exemplify the judicial and moral imperatives at issue here and thus constitute an appeal to the Tribunal that it order the parties involved to cease and desist with the abuses of power and abuses of process being conducted against me. They not only demonstrate the necessity identified by Frank Dimant’s public call, but also identify the fact that the “alternative reality” occupied by the CHRC and the Complainants is a perverse judicial Twilight Zone and a renegade digression from the “reality” espoused by the executive level of the Complainants’ own organization and, not least, the formal and real judicial system which all Canadians are subject to.

If there is any further formality or motion that you require, please let me know as soon as possible.

Sincerely,

Arthur Topham pro se
Publisher/Editor
The RadicalPress.com

Cc:
Anita Bromberg, Co-complainant
Marvin Kurz, Complainant Counsel
Harry Abrams, Complainant
Daniel Poulin, Commission counsel
Douglas Christie, Intervenor, Canadian Free Speech League

[Editor’s Note: Yuppers, another Motion in response to the issue of the Canadian Human Rights Commission’s sneaky little plan to change the nature of the actual complaint laid against RadicalPress.com by Harry Abrams and the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada. Again, a move that the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal is attempting to aid and abet by endorsing the position of the Commission; one that blatantly changes the actual wording of the complaint from promoting “hatred toward Jews and/or citizens of Israel” to . . . get this, to promoting “hatred toward Jews and non-whites”!!!

Now, all of a sudden, in the midst of a near two year ordeal, the Commission has decided to drop the charge of promoting hatred toward citizens of Israel and instead have these citizens of Israel shapeshift into “non-whites”, whatever the hell that is supposed to mean!

Tribunal member Karen Jensen who is overseeing this aspect of the hearing has signed her name to the ruling indicating her complicity in accepting this absurd and illegal act on the part of the Commission. I, in turn, am trying to point out to member Jensen that the actions of the Commission and those of the Tribunal are beginning to take on a distinctly biased and partial character and are also making it extremely difficult for me to play by the rules.]

——–

JUDICIAL CHICANERY: MOTION TO RECONSIDER THE JUNE 2, 2009 TRIBUNAL DECISION (2) TO ALLOW THE CHRC TO ALTER EVIDENCE IN THEIR STATEMENT OF PARTICULARS

BY EMAIL

Arthur Topham
Pub/Ed
The Radical Press
Box 4633 Barkerville Hwy
Quesnel, B.C. V2J 6T8
Email: radical@radicalpress.com

June 10,  2009

Nancy Lafontant
Registry Officer
Canadian Human Rights Tribunal
Nancy.Lafontant@chrt-tcdp.gc.ca

Dear Nancy Lafontant,

RE: Harry Abrams and the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada v. Arthur Topham and the RadicalPress.com
File Number: T1360/9008

The enclosed notice of motion results from the June 2, 2009 email letter from the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal containing Tribunal member Karen Jensen’s decision with respect to my motion (2) of April 23, 2009, to further amend the CHRC’s statement of particulars.

In her decision Tribunal member Jensen states the following:

“Mr. Topham has requested that I order the Commission to amend its Statement of Particulars in which the Commission identifies the issue in the present case as being whether the communications allegedly made by the Respondent are likely to expose Jews and other non-whites to hatred or contempt, contrary to s. 13 of the CHRA. Mr. Topham maintains that the underlined portion of this statement should be changed to “and/or citizens of Israel”.

If Mr. Topham believes that Commission counsel has mischaracterized the issue, he is free to set out what he believes the issue to be in his Statement of Particulars and to argue that at the hearing. The Statement of Particulars provides the parties with an opportunity to present their views of the case. The pre-hearing process is not the time for a debate about those views; that debate takes place during the hearing on the merits of the complaint. Therefore, I will not require the Commission to amend its Statement of Particulars.”

The latitude of judicial chicanery contained in this ruling borders on the incredulous and demands of me a further degree of outspoken protest and rebuke toward the three associated parties involved in this complaint.

(more…)

The real political advisers who are directing MP Harper’s Con-serve-Israel government
_________________________________________________________________________

[Editor’s Note: Mr. Rogers is an octogenarian with the political perspicacity of a wise Elder.

There was a time when cultures respected the words of their Elders as is still traditionally so in Native American circles.

Maybe it’s time we once again began paying homage to those who have the courage to speak out in defense of their country when even to do so is deemed to be politically incorrect by some.

I, for one, hold Grenville’s advice in the deepest of respect and admiration and thus would admonish other Canadians who believe in their country and its prized possessions of freedom of speech and political and spiritual sovereignty to do as he has done. Speak out! Voice your opinions without fear and with conviction and sincerity and the knowledge that what you are doing WILL have a positive effect upon others. If we are to ever regain our footings as an independent and free country and repossess our respect and our integrity then we MUST face our enemies who, from within, are hell-bent on destroying all that Canada once was that made her great and glorious.

Please pass this vitally important letter on to as many concerned Canadians as you can think of.]

————-

Mr. Irving R. Gerstein, CFO
Conservative Party of Canada Fundraiser
Irving R GERSTEIN irving_gerstein@conservativefund.ca

Dear Mr Gerstein:

Mr. Gerstein, I am very concerned about the future of my country, and the direction in which our current Prime Minister is forcing us to go.

In good conscience, I cannot, and therefore will not longer support a party or government that does not act in the best interests of Canada and Canadians, a government which supports terrorism, as does the CPC under its present leader.  The party and its leader practice deceit and hypocrisy, and act in secrecy. I am convinced that not one single Canadian really trusts this leader or government, or Mr. Ignatieff or Mr. Layton. Integrity, at every level, is conspicuous by its complete and utter absence.

Mr. Harper has proven to be a dictator, not a leader of a democracy, which Canada pretends to be. Canada was, at one time in the distant past, close to being a democracy.  Canada has never been a democracy.

Canada is defintely not the “Free and Democratic” country that our erstwhile leader(s) trumpet it to be. We certainly do not have “Freedom of Expression for all” and we are demonstrably not democratic. Canadians live under the most powerful dictatorship in the world. Canada’s PM Harper has placed Canada in the deadly vortex of the doomed “USS Titanic”. He will not be a captain that goes down with his ship. Mr. Harper also has clearly demonstrated that he now worships at the Trinitarian Synagogue (Israel, Judaism, Zionism)., the central dogma of which is the gospel of a sacred holocaust.

Do you get that strange feeling of being surrounded by foreign interest groups?
__________________________________________________________________________

The leader and party have declared support for a particular religion, Judaism, over all other religions. This is odious, especially in light of the supremacist teachings of the most holy book of Judaism, the Babylonian Talmud.

PM Harper, as does each puppet US President, takes his cue and orders from the Israel Lobby.

President Ariel Sharon was very blunt, straightforward and truthful, when, on 3 October 2001, he told Mr. Shimon Peres, as reported on Kol Yisrael radio, that “We, the Jewish people, control America, and the Americans know it.”

Mr. Sharon’s complete statement to Mr. Shimon Peres is: “Every time we do something, you tell me America will do this and will do that … I want to tell you something very clear: Don’t worry about American pressure on Israel.  We, the Jewish people, control America, and the Americans know it.”

Menachim Begin, Former Prime Minister of Israel, declared:

“Our race is the Master Race.
We are divine Gods on this planet.
We are as different from the inferior races as they are from insects.
Compared to our race, other races are beasts and animals, cattle at best.
Other races are considered as human excrement.
Our destiny is to rule over the inferior races.
Our earthly kingdom will be ruled by our leader with a rod of iron.
The masses will lick our feet, and serve us as our slaves.”

I find these statements most disturbing, especially in light of PM Harper’s total commitment to Israel and to the defense of Judaism.  Perhaps you are similarly concerned.

B’nia Brith International - secret society of Zionists hiding
behind Canada’s infamous Section 13(1) gag laws
___________________________________________________________________
Mr. Harper is the most dangerous PM that Canada has ever had. Deceitfully following in the footsteps of his predecessors as regards the NAU (North American Union). He professes to be an economist, yet has no idea of, let alone intention of using the Bank of Canada to finance true infrastructure, and the maintenance of existing true infrastructure.

He, all by his dictatorial self, commits billions of the taxpayers’ hard-earned dollars to military equipment and foreign policy misadventures. But he never tells Canadians where that money comes from. He is mortgaging our great-grandchildren’s lives. He could and should, but will not use the BOC (Bank of Canada) for true infrastructure  projects that benefit Canada and Canadians.

Please convey these concerns and the warnings implicit in them, to PM Harper. Thank you.

Respectfully,

Grenville Rogers
grogers@vianet.ca

COMING SOON TO CANADA: OUR OWN ZIONIST-INDUCED GULAG WHERE TRUTH IS NO DEFENSE AND EVIDENCE AND INTENT IS FUTILE
________________________________________________________________________________

[Editor’s Note: This ongoing farcical melo-drama, better known as the Zionist program to use Canada’s Human Rights Commissions and their Tribunals, to introduce into our democratic society draconian, illegal and immoral legislation which would make criminals of anyone who wanted to express his own thoughts and ideas on either political issues or cultural mores, etc. continues on.

The motion contained in this post is again a result of the commissars attempting to change the language of the original charge made against me by Harry Abrams and the League of Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada so as to project an entirely different and new meaning on to what their actual scheme is all about.

Originally I was charged with spreading “hatred toward Jews and/or citizens of Israel” but now, suddenly out of the blackness of the Commission’s basement where they must gather to conspire against free speech lovers, they suddenly come up with the phrase, “other non-white[sic]” to replace the words, “and/or citizens of Israel”!!!

Now, apart from the fact that they couldn’t even get the English correct (see the full text in the article), such a blatant example of attempting to cover up B’nai Brith Canada’s original tracks by sprinkling over them a pile of “non-white” rhetoric is as lame as it its criminal and disingenuous on the part of this supposedly honourable, government, quasi-judicial organization designed to protect all Canadians from “persecution” by hateful groups within our borders. It begs the question of who the hell is being anti-Canadian and hateful.

Again, please read this article carefully. Your Internet, your ability to express your opinions, and your country itself, could be in imminent danger from these foreign lobbyists hiding within our midst.]

MOTION TO FURTHER AMEND CHRC STATEMENT OF PARTICULARS
BY EMAIL

Arthur Topham
Pub/Ed
The Radical Press
Box 4633 Barkerville Hwy
Quesnel, B.C. V2J 6T8
Email: radical@radicalpress.com

April 23,  2009

Nancy Lafontant
Registry Officer
Canadian Human Rights Tribunal
Nancy.Lafontant@chrt-tcdp.gc.ca

Dear Nancy Lafontant,

RE: Harry Abrams and the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada v. Arthur Topham and the RadicalPress.com
File Number: T1360/9008

The motion contained herein bears upon the Amended Statement of Particulars which the Respondent, Arthur Topham, received from commission counsel, Daniel Poulin, dated April 8, 2009.

There is one additional issue of immediate concern contained in the section of the Amended Statement of Particulars titled “ISSUES” which requires immediate redress. In this section Mr. Poulin has stated:

“The issue to be raised before the Tribunal in this case is as follows:

Did the Respondents communicate or cause to be communicated, in whole or in part, by means of a computer, including the internet, any matter that is likely to expose Jews and other non-white[sic] to hatred or contempt, contrary to section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act?”

The wording of this statement needs to be changed in order to reflect and comply with the actual issue as outlined in the original complaint by Harry Abrams and the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada.

Apart from the faulty use of the English language, which appears to be endemic throughout the majority of the correspondence received thus far by the respondent from the Tribunal (and this is stated without malice), the nature of this complaint and the extreme importance of it to the majority of Canadians regarding the deliberately planned precedent which the complainants hope to establish, demands that the actual alleged complaint be clearly stated rather than the nebulous, poorly worded text which Mr. Poulin has proffered all parties as the “Issue” in this complaint case.

(more…)

THIS SERIES IS DEDICATED TO CANADIAN PM STEPHEN HARPER IN THE HOPE THAT HE WILL SEE THE LIGHT WITH REGARD TO B’NAI BRITH CANADA AND BAN THEM FROM THE COUNTRY ALONG WITH THE TERRORIST JEWISH DEFENSE LEAGUE.

___________________________________________________________________________

ADL - DEFENSE ARM OF B’NAI BRITH.
___________________________________

JEWISH DEFENSE LEAGUE
TERRORIST ARM OF B’NAI BRITH.

_________________________________

THE AUTHOR

MILTON WILLIAM COOPER
May 6, 1943 - November 5, 2001

[Editor’s Note: William Cooper was murdered by police on November 5th, 2001 at the age of 58. He was an American writer, shortwave broadcaster who came into public awareness in the late 1980s. William was also a radio host, author and political activist known for his best-selling underground book titled Behold A Pale Horse and his worldwide shortwave radio show Hour of the Time. Cooper was also known for his court battle with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and the recorded attempts to dissuade him from pursuing his case.

William Cooper founded Harvest Trust, the CAJI News Service, Veritas newspaper, The Intelligence Service, and Harvest Publications. Under his leadership Harvest Trust ventured into publishing. The first book under the Harvest Trust imprint was Oklahoma City: Day One (ISBN 0-9653307-1-0), by Michele Marie Moore about the Oklahoma City bombing.

An advocate for free radio, Cooper operated the unlicensed Independence Foundation Trust at 101.1 FM in Eagar, Arizona. Cooper claimed to have helped over 700 low power FM affiliate stations get equipped and on the air.

My belief is that Cooper was murdered by the Illuminati because of his work to expose the Beast to the public. This series of talks on B’nai Brith and the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) was part of his work to enlighten the public on who’s who behind the veil. Right at the beginning of this series he makes a comment about just such a scenario arising for many who did what he did. God willing he’ll be the last one to die for such efforts. Bless his soul.
The title of the series on RadicalPress.com is mine. Seeing as the ADL is but an offshoot of B’nai Brith and many people here in Canada think of this organization as B’nai Brith I’ve decided to use it in the title.]

The Unveiling of B’nai Brith by William Cooper Part 5 of 8

Anti-Defamation League #5

THE HOUR OF THE TIME
Tape No. 535:  “ADL #5″
Thursday, January 26, 1995

This broadcast was taken in whole or in part from investigations conducted by the CAJI News Service, and the Intelligence Service, and from reports published by The Executive Intelligence Review entitled “The Ugly Truth About The ADL”, and “Dope Inc.”.

From the “Miami Harold”, Miami, Florida, June 29th, 1994:  “ADL Launches Book Against Religious Right”, by Peggy Landers, “Harold” Religious Writer.

“Art Teitlebaum minced no words Tuesday in blasting a contingent of the religious right for using what he called ‘murderously mean tactics’…”

Murderously mean tactics!

“…in pursuing an exclusionist and dangerous political agenda, particularly in Florida.

“The Anti-Defamation League Southern Area Director called a news conference at his downtown office to announce the distribution of a 190-page National Anti-Defamation League Report called ‘The Religious Right:  The Assault On Tolerance and Pluralism in America’.

“The book, which costs $7.50, and is available through the Miami ADL Office, is the result of a year-long national research project to document what its authors call ‘a bitter push to replace the wall of separation of church and state with a citadel of Christianity, while suggesting that those who defend the walls are enemies of God’.”

Well, it sounds like at least they know who they are.

“It warns that the Religious Right is seeking to Christianize public school curricula and gain control of the Republican Party.

“‘Florida has become a lightning-rod state for grass-roots campaigns to return prayer to public schools, oppose abortion, elect Christian candidates, and oppose civil rights protections for homosexuals,’ Teitlebaum said.

“‘Florida represents, in many of its communities, what America will be like in the year 2000 in cultural diversity and changing demographics. The state’s future depends on our success in being a multi-cultural society,’ he said.

He pointed to the murder of Dr. David Gunn by religious anti-abortion activists in Pensacola…

I wonder why he didn’t point to any of the murders committed by the ADL.

(more…)

Your Handy Dandy Reference Guide to the CHRC complaint against RadicalPress.com plus the CHR Tribunal process and hearing

Dear Radical Reader,

In the process of preparing some type of index of the related articles, etc surrounding this case for use with the media I decided to put together an easy to use list of urls that one might use to access most of the information pertaining to my case with the CHRC and the upcoming CHR Tribunal hearing.  Hopefully it will be useful for those interested in the outcome of this struggle for freedom of the Internet and for free speech.

If you discover that any of the urls are malfunctioning I would appreciate hearing about it. Thank you.

Shine your Light for Love & Peace & Justice for All,

Arthur Topham
Pub/Ed
The Radical Press
Canada’s Radical News Network
radical@radicalpress.com
http://www.radicalpress.com
“Digging to the root of the issues since 1998”
——————————————————-

RELATED URLS TO CANADIAN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION COMPLAINT (FILE NO: 20071016) AGAINST RADICALPRESS.COM BY HARRY ABRAMS & B’NAI BRITH CANADA

PLUS INFORMATION RELATED TO THE UPCOMING CANADIAN HUMAN RIGHTS TRIBUNAL HEARING (FILE NO: T1360/9006)

CORRESPONDENCE BETWEEN CHRC & RADICALPRESS.COM:

http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=821
CHRC Complaint Against RadicalPress.com from Harry Abrams and B’nai Brith Canada
November 20, 2007

http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=629
Response to Canadian Human Rights Commission by the RadicalPress.com,
January 3, 2008

http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=686
International Support for Radical Press expressed through Letters to Quesnel Cariboo Observer
January 13, 2008

http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=785
Report from CHRC Investigations Division Re: Abrams/B’nai Brith Complaint against RadicalPress.com
August 27, 2008

http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=786
Comments on CHRC Report. Re: Complaint from Harry Abrams and B’nai Brith Canada against RadicalPress.com
September 17, 2008

http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=816
Letter from the CHRC to RadicalPress.com
November 21, 2008

http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=838
B’nai Brith: Beating the anti-Semitic Drum (updated article from Sept. 5, 2005)
By Arthur Topham
December 3, 2008

(more…)

[With apologies to Roy Peterson-Ed.]
________________________________

[Editor’s Note: As part of my overall purpose in challenging B’nai Brith Canada’s right to use the Canadian Human Rights Act to censor debate on political issues - specifically issues related to the ideology known as Zionism and its manifested forms throughout democratic and non-democratic nations of the world, including Israel and Palestine -  the illegality and the supreme danger to Canada of this specious piece of federal legislation known as Section 13(1) of the Canadian Human Rights Act has to be challenged from every angle humanly and legally possible. That is why I deemed it necessary to include it in my current case involving Harry Abrams and League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada.

There is a similar challenge that has already gone through the hearing process, one initiated by Marc Lemire. Please see the following Part 1 of the challenge at http://www.freedomsite.org/legal/Closing_submissions_constitutional-part_1.html and Part 2 at http://www.freedomsite.org/legal/Closing_submissions_constitutional-part_2.html

That decision in that case was reserved and should be handed down within the next couple of months. I say should but it could be delayed longer. In the interim period the Tribunal juggernaut continues to move onward in its relentless quest for new victims to grind into the dust along with the rights they are fighting to preserve.

Eventually Canadians are going to HAVE TO wake up to what is being perpetrated upon them.]

_________________________________

RadicalPress.com Constitutional Challenge to Sec. 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act

Filed March 21, 2009

TRIBUNAL FILE NUMBER T1360/9006

CANADIAN HUMAN RIGHTS TRIBUNAL BETWEEN:

HARRY ABRAMS and THE LEAGUE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS OF B’NAI BRITH CANADA

COMPLAINANTS

AND

CANADIAN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION

AND

ARTHUR TOPHAM and RADICALPRESS.COM

RESPONDENTS

NOTICE OF CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION

The applicant, Arthur Topham, intends to question the constitutional applicability, validity and effect of sections 13 and 54 (1), (1.1)  of the Canadian Human Rights Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. H-6, as amended (herein after referred to as the “CHRA”).

The question is to be argued in a motion in writing filed with the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal.

The following are the material facts giving rise to the constitutional question: The Canadian Human Rights Commission requested the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal  to appoint a panel to inquire into a complaint laid against myself, Arthur Topham and my website RadicalPress.com under section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act. The complaint alleges that Arthur Topham and RadicalPress.com contrive to promote ongoing hatred affecting persons identifiable as Jews and/or as citizens of Israel by publishing articles on RadicalPress.com believed by the complainants to be discriminatory against these two groups.

Arthur Topham is bringing a motion before the Tribunal for relief under sections 24(1) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and section 52 of the Constitution Act, 1982, and section 2 of the Canadian Bill of Rights on the grounds that sections 13 and 54(1), (1.1)  of the Canadian Human Rights Act are  a violation of sections 2 (a) and (b), 7, 26 and 31 of the Charter, not saved by section 1 thereof, and sections 1 (d) and (f) of the Canadian Bill of Rights.

The following is the legal basis for the constitutional question:

Section 13 of the CHRA was held to be in violation of the right to freedom of expression guaranteed under s. 2(b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms by the Supreme Court of Canada in Canada (Human Rights Commission) v. Taylor, [1990] 3 S.C.R. 892. The Court upheld the constitutionality of section 13, however, on the grounds that it was a reasonable limit on that freedom prescribed by law that was demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society pursuant to section 1 of the Charter.

The Taylor decision was based on an earlier legislative version of section 13 of the CHRA which limited the provision to the communication of hate messages using a telephone and limited penalties to a cease and desist order. The Act was amended in 1998, c.9, s.28 and 2001, c. 41, s. 88 to extend the application of section 13 to computer networks, including the Internet, and to introduce harsh financial penalty provisions in section 54 in addition to the previous cease and desist order provisions.

The applicant will be arguing that section 13 of the CHRA no longer meets the criteria in section 1 of the Charter  regarding freedom of expression and cannot be saved thereunder. The provision is, in essence, one of criminal law but one which provides no procedural safeguards, no defence of truth, lack of intent, or the fact that the messages may be privileged, fair comment or made in private communications. It is made applicable to the Internet, a medium far different from the taped voice messages on a telephone dealt with by the Supreme Court of Canada in the Taylor case.

Moreover, he will argue that the freedoms enjoyed by Canadians under the law in the 1950’s cannot be destroyed using section 1 of the Canadian Charter of Rights as a justification; and, further, that such freedoms are preserved by virtue of the Canadian Bill of Rights and section 26 of the Charter. Parliament has no jurisdiction under the Constitution Act, 1867, to abrogate the right of citizens in a democracy to discuss matters of public policy and administration, be it social, economic or political.

Switzman v. Elbling, [1957] S.C.R. 285, Boucher v. The King, [1951] S.C.R. 265 and Reference re Alberta Statutes, [1938] S.C.R. 100 will be relied upon.

Section 13 is not rationally connected to the legislative objective of promoting social harmony and individual dignity, since there can be no true social harmony between groups when truth is not the basis of this harmony.

There is no proportionality between the effect of the measures which limit the Charter right to freedom of speech and the legislative objective of section 13(1) of the Act. It is overbroad and fails to impair freedom of speech as little as possible, thereby having a severe chilling effect on legitimate expression on the Internet which includes newspapers, journals, magazines, videos, radio, audio, and discussion rooms. The definitions of “hatred” and “contempt” in practical effect are so vague as to include virtually any legitimate and verifiable criticism of the actions of an identifiable group.

Section 13  is a violation of the freedom of conscience because it denies the individual the right to speak the truth if that truth is deemed to expose identifiable groups to hatred or contempt.    Where truth is no defence to charges under section 13(1) of the Act, there is no objective standard for judging what is “hatred” or “contempt”.

Section 13 violates all rights to privacy as it applies to private communications.

The penalty provisions make clear that while section 13 masquerades as a remedial anti-discriminatory measure, it is in essence a criminal provision enforcing a moral code and inflicting punishment against the offender for violations against the State, not simply infringement of an individual’s rights for which compensation might be paid.

The deleterious effects of section 13 of the Act on the right to freedom of expression and conscience far outweigh the benefits derived from the provision. Hatred and contempt against groups arises from everyday news events. Published in newspapers and broadcast facilities, these matters have the defences of truth, privilege and fair comment according to libel law.

Such further and other grounds as I, Arthur Topham, pro se may advise and the Tribunal allow.

DATED this 21st day of March,  2009.

______________________
Arthur Topham pro se
4633 Barkerville Hwy
Quesnel, B.C. V2J 6T8
Tel: 250-992-3479
Fax: 250-992-8033
—————————

(more…)

THE 1st EDITION OF THE RADICAL CAME OUT JUNE, 1998. IT’S HEADLINES NOW STAND AS A FOREWARNING OF THE STRUGGLES THAT LAY AHEAD WITH THE SUBVERSIVE FORCES OF TYRANNY EMBEDDED IN CANADA’S GOVERNMENT, JUDICIARY, MEDIA AND INSTITUTIONS

______________________________________________________________________________

Dear Free Speech lovers,

As you can see from the headlines of the First Edition of The Radical of June, 1998 the prime objective of The Radical Press was to ensure that Canadians would not end up living under a tyrannical government that used censorship to silence important debates of any nature be they political, religious, philosophical, or otherwise.

Whether that original headline was a prophetic warning of things to come or not waits to be seen still. Judging from the events of the last few years it appears that the forces of repression and censorship in this nation are bound and determined to do their best to turn Canada into another Orwellian police state where freedom of speech becomes a thing of the past.

As we’ve seen just recently with the Harper government’s shameful kowtowing to the Canadian Jewish Defense League and their  banishing of British MP George Galloway from entering Canada, the writing is definitely on the wall! Now is the time for concerned citizens everywhere to speak out and let our politicians know, in no uncertain terms, that such behavior on the part of our elected representatives is NOT ACCEPTABLE IN THIS FREE NATION!

The Zionist forces hiding within these lobbyist groups like B’nai Brith Canada, the Canadian Jewish Congress and this newcomer on the block, the Jewish Defense League, are all working in the interests of foreign governments rather than the people of Canada and our right to free expression.

Since I first put out a plea on the net March 2, 2009 for letters of support in my battle with Zionist B’nai Brith Canada the response has been phenomenal and positive. From notable and busy activists such as Jeff Rense, David Icke, and Canadian website owner Connie Fournier of www.freedominion.ca to people across Canada, the USA and the world, encouraging messages of support for freedom of speech on the Internet are growing stronger by the day.

As only a couple of days remain before I must send all these letters to the Tribunal as part of the upcoming hearing process I’m enclosing some examples received thus far by individuals who, regardless of their extremely busy schedules or place of residence, have taken the time to lend their support to this important complaint case by the CHRC and Tribunal.

Please read them or at least scan through them. Hopefully you will be moved to also express your thoughts on this issue. In more ways than one time is running out and please don’t misconstrue that statement as mere scare tactics on my part.
Anyone wishing to see the form letter that can help you with the basics of the case please go to the following url at RadicalPress.com. http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=937

Also I must put in a plug for financial help from those willing and able. Please see  http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=930    for details.

Please pass this message along if you can. Thanks.

PS. Due to time constrains I’m not going to make links of all the email addresses contained in the letters. If you wish to contact any of the writers merely copy and paste their address from the article.

Shine your Light for Love & Peace & Justice for All,

Arthur Topham
Pub/Ed
The Radical Press

——————————————————-

LETTERS OF SUPPORT FOR RADICALPRESS.COM

#93

Shastah Topham
shastatopham@yahoo.com

Nancy Lafontant
Registry Officer
Canadian Human Rights Tribunal
Nancy.Lafontant@chrt-tcdp.gc.ca

Date: March 25th 2009

Nancy Lafontant,

RE: File Number: T1360/9008

The complaint case by the Canadian Human Rights Commission involving Arthur Topham and his website RadicalPress.com and Harry Abrams and the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada is one which deeply concerns me.

Arthur Topham and I have been married for over thirty years. My Jewish heritage has never been an issue in our life together - in fact quite the opposite. He often mentioned he knew he would marry a Jewish woman.

I feel that it is of paramount importance for the tribunal to distinguish the difference between “anti-Semitism” and “anti-Zionism”. They are not one and the same concept.

Anti-Semitism bespeaks of racism and hatred towards Jews. My husband Arthur Topham has never demonstrated behaviors of racism or hatred toward myself, or any person, group, or religion.

Political Zionism, on the other hand, is a practice which is not remotely connected to religion or God. It is more of a philosophy or ideology based on astronomical greed, corruption, power and control.

The book, “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion” clearly indicates the ideology and concepts of what Zionism is based on. I suggest that each and every person within the CHR Commission and the CHR Tribunal read “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion” to educate themselves on the true nature of Political Zionism.

My husband Arthur Topham, in his quest to expose Political Zionism and educate the world, is uncovering a massive Zionist secret nest of lies and deceit, the origin of which goes back well beyond the Twentieth Century.

Any attempts to muzzle the truths that Arthur Topham is bringing forward to the public would be silencing his God given right to free speech. All people who sit on the CHRC and CHRT are cognizant of this truth, and must therefore decide which master they will serve – SATANIC ideology – or the GOD of TRUTH, INTEGRITY and LOVE.

Mrs. Shastah Topham
Cottonwood, B.C.

#86

Nancy Lafontant
Registry Officer
Canadian Human Rights Tribunal
Nancy.Lafontant@chrt-tcdp.gc.ca

March 20, 2009

Dear Nancy Lafontant,

RE: File Number: T1360/9008

The complaint case by the Canadian Human Rights Commission involving Arthur Topham and his website RadicalPress.com and Harry Abrams and the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada is not only of extreme importance to citizens of Canada but also to the people of the United States of America.

I am an American citizen and the owner of a major alternative News Network (www.rense.com) and the host-producer of my own nationally-syndicated Talk Radio Program (for 15 years) here in the U.S.

Like Canada’s notorious Sec. 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act, our US House Judiciary is also currently facing two pending federal ‘hate’ crime bills-HR 256 and 262.

These ‘hate crimes’ bills - introduced by special interest groups not unlike those in Canada now attempting to destroy Mr. Topham and his website - pose a direct threat to the First Amendment to our US Constitution; and like Sec. 13 of your CHR Act, ought to have no place in any of our respective nations’ law books.  All human beings have a God-given birthright to their own opinions and thoughts.  There is no such thing as ‘partial’ or ‘restricted’ free speech just as there is no way to be partially pregnant.  We either have full, unfettered Freedom of Speech, or we have none.

I am adamant in my feeling that the VAST majority of Canadians, just like Americans, do not want or need ANY anti-free speech laws…and all efforts in that regard should be taken to rid your nation of them.

It is my position that censorship of ideas and opinions of people anywhere has no place in the media nor on the Internet in a free world.

On behalf of Arthur Topham and RadicalPress.com, I would ask that you give serious attention to eliminating these draconian laws from your Canadian Human Rights Act and allow Freedom of Speech to resume its rightful place in all forms of debate.

Sincerely,

Jeff Rense
sightings@mindspring.com

#88

Nancy Lafontant
Registry Officer
Canadian Human Rights Tribunal
Nancy.Lafontant@chrt-tcdp.gc.ca

March 22, 2009

Dear Nancy Lafontant,

RE: File Number: T1360/9008

The complaint case brought against Arthur Topham and his website RadicalPress.com by the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada via the Canadian Human Rights Commission is not only of utmost importance to all Canadians who wish to express themselves on the Internet freely but to people everywhere who value this basic human right.

As a British citizen and the owner/operator of one of the world’s largest alternative websites ( www.davidicke.com ) I find it outrageous that such injustice is now being perpetrated upon Arthur Topham and his website.

Like Mr. Topham I also have also been attacked by the likes of former CHRC Investigator and serial litigator Richard Warman, who takes the term ‘thin skin’ to new levels of meaning. As a result, I have been accused of similar ludicrous “hate crimes” when I could not be racist if my life depended on it. So I understand the nature of this charge against Topham and his website.

Canada’s notorious and discredited Sec. 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act, was designed by special interest groups such as the Canadian Jewish Congress, B’nai Brith Canada and others and then inserted into the CHR Act to be used against other individual Canadians and groups who, according to Canada’s Bill of Rights and its Charter of Rights and Freedoms as well as the International Right under the Charter of Rights of the United Nations, nonetheless retain the legal, and most basic, human right to express their opinions and those of others on their websites or in their public writings.

This problem of Zionist lobby groups attempting to subvert the constitutional rights of free speech in so-called free nations around the world is becoming more and more obvious and vast numbers of people who once dismissed such claims as ‘racist’ are now seeing this blatant fact. The example of your federal government banning an elected British MP, George Galloway, from entering Canada is just the most recent and graphic example of what I’m talking about.

On behalf of Arthur Topham and RadicalPress.com, and all freedom-supporting Canadians who oppose such actions by lobbyists for foreign nations, I would suggest you give serious attention to eliminating these draconian laws from your Canadian Human Rights Act and allow the fundamental and crucial right to freedom of speech to resume its rightful place in all forms of debate.

After all, your own children and grandchildren will also have to live in the Orwellian world you are helping to create. Will they thank-you for it? Or be disgusted?

Sincerely,

David Icke
8 Vernon House,
20 Wood Street,
Ryde,
Isle of Wight
United Kingdom
PO33 2JR

BOOKRES@aol.com

#87

Nancy Lafontant
Registry Officer
Canadian Human Rights Tribunal
Nancy.Lafontant@chrt-tcdp.gc.ca

March 20, 2009

Dear Nancy Lafontant,

RE: File Number: T1360/9008

I am writing on behalf of Arthur Topham from the Radical Press.

Mr. Topham is the respondent in a Section 13 complaint by Mr. Harry Abrams.

Although Arthur Topham has political opinions that differ vastly from my own, I think it is important that he is allowed to express them, and I am deeply disgusted that the CHRC is still busily trying to censor Canadian citizens.

The CHRC has come under intense scrutiny over the past year, and this whole process has been discredited.  It really is time that they stopped trying to police the online speech of Canadians and started doing something useful, like protecting human rights instead of stomping on them.

When this case goes to a Tribunal, I guarantee that it will be covered extensively in the online media, and that the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal will not have another opportunity to conduct their business in the dark and, in the words of Richard Warman, “continue their tradition” of issuing lifetime Cease and Desist Orders to every respondent.

Mr. Topham will not be fighting this fight alone.  Those days are over.

Sincerely,

Connie Fournier
Free Dominion
Connie Fournier connie@freedominion.ca

#85

Nancy Lafontant
Registry Officer
Canadian Human Rights Tribunal
Nancy.Lafontant@chrt-tcdp.gc.ca

March 19, 2009

Ms Lafontant;

RE: File Number: T1360/9008

I’m writing to you today to express my concerns over a case currently before your tribunal; Harry Abrams and the B’nai Brith vs. Arthur Topham and his website radicalpress.com.

Right off the bat I’m going to tell you that I think Topham’s ideas, in regards to Jews, are repulsive.  I find them inaccurate and ill-informed.  That said, however, I also have a very strong belief that as a free individual in what is supposed to be a free country, Topham has the right to express those ideas unhindered by the state.  As a person who believes very strongly in the fundamental right of ALL Canadians to be able to express their opinions without fear, I wish to register my dissatisfaction with the fact that special lobby groups and thin skinned serial complainers are attempting to use the Canadian Human Rights Act and Sec. 13(1) to stop their fellow Canadians from expressing their opinions and beliefs.

Arthur Topham is before your Tribunal where he’s charged with the crime of committing “hate speech”.  More specifically, as indicated by Harry Abrams in his complaint, and while Abrams was gloating on the Western Standard blog ( http://www.no-libs.com/files/w_s_abrams.htm ), Topham is being persecuted for making available, a copy of the “Protocols Of The Elders Of Zion”, a document that is freely available on the internet.  I myself have made that document available on my website, along with 2 other documents that Harry Abrams will surely find offensive; the Quran http://no-libs.com/media/docs/Quran.pdf and Mein Kampf http://no-libs.com/media/docs/meinkampf.pdf .

If Harry Abrams and your tribunal are to continue with your persecution of Arthur Topham, you’ll have to stand me alongside him as I’ve committed the exact same “crime”.

My name is Richard Evans and you know where to find me.

Richard Evans
richard@no-libs.com

#79

Nancy Lafontant
Registry Officer
Canadian Human Rights Tribunal
Nancy.Lafontant@chrt-tcdp.gc.ca

Date: March 16, 2009

Dear Nancy Lafontant,

RE: File Number: T1360/9008

I have known Arthur Topham as editor of Radical Press for approximately 15 years and he has always expressed his opinions openly without prejudice and he has no expectations of persuasion or transference on behalf of the reader. He often expresses radical assumptions and provides interesting conjecture through his editorials. His aptly named former newspaper and website “Radical Press” should indicate to any free thinking intelligent individual the challenging level of his discourse.

As a person who believes very strongly in the fundamental right of ALL Canadians to be able to express their opinions and views without fear of legal repercussions I wish to register my dissatisfaction with the fact that special lobby groups in Canada are attempting to use the Canadian Human Rights Act and Sec. 13(1) to stop their fellow Canadians from expressing their opinions and beliefs on matters of importance to Canada.

I strongly feel that a person’s right to speak their mind in an open, civil and truthful manner on political, social and religious issues of the day is crucial to an understanding of how our society and the world at large works and that a person’s viewpoint should not be censored merely because it disagrees with either the status quo or the position of another interest group with differing political views.

Judging from how this Sec. 13(1) of the Canadian Human Rights Act has been used to unfairly penalize free expression in Canada I believe that this legislation should be removed from the CHR Act and that issue of “hate crimes” should be dealt with as in the Criminal Code of Canada where a person thus charged has the right to a fair trial in a court of law with either a Judge or a Judge and Jury.

Thank you,

Denis Walsh,
City Councillor, Kamloops.
520A Seymour St.,
Kamloops, BC
denis@telus.net

#84

March 18, 2009

Nancy Lafontant
Registry Officer
Canadian Human Rights Tribunal
Nancy.Lafontant@chrt-tcdp.gc.ca

Dear Ms Lafontant,

RE: File Number: T1360/9008 (B’nai B’rith Canada vs. RadicalPress.com)

I am writing in connection to the complaint made against Mr. Arthur Topham and The Radical that is now before the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal.  In this case, the complaint appears to have been brought by the B’nai B’rith in regard to Mr. Topham’s writings on Israel and Zionism.  A recent case against columnist Mark Steyn was made by another special interest group alleging that Mr. Steyn had instigated hatred against Muslims.

As a person of Jewish heritage, I find much of what Mr. Topham writes about these topics difficult to read, occasionally overstated, and sometimes (in my view) simply wrong.  By the same token, I find Mr. Steyn’s commentary about Islam and Muslims often misguided.  Both of these journalists, however, are also often thought provoking and insightful.  Regardless of how one views such writings, whether they match the world/political/social perspectives of others, the freedom to express opinions publicly without the fear of legal repercussions for doing so is a fundamental civil right of all Canadians.

Certainly, there are those who would find any criticism of a particular group or ideology offensive, yet it is not the place of such self-appointed guardians to protect me or my fellow citizens from opinions that may not match our own.  The hallmark of a free society is the right to hold contrary opinions and to express them in public.  For this reason, any attempt to censor so called hateful ideas by the use of the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal has no place in such a society.  Commentary that poses real risks to the lives of others can easily be dealt with by means of the Criminal Code of Canada. Using Sec. 13(1) of the Canadian Human Rights Act to accomplish the work of the Criminal Code is a blatant misuse of the laws of the land.  It is also, I suggest, a certain path to political tyranny of the majority to censor ideas and their expression.

Sincerely yours,

C.A. Shaw, Ph.D
1706 Deep Cove Road
North Vancouver, B.C.
V7G 1S5 Canada
Email: cashawlab@gmail.com

Christopher A. Shaw, Ph.D
Professor
Dept. of Ophthalmology
University of British Columbia
828 W. 10th Ave, Vancouver, BC,
V5Z 1L8
tel: 604-875-4111 (68373)

(more…)

Anti-war MP George Galloway leader of the Respect party in Britain

______________________________________________________
[Editor’s Note: Thanks to Charles Tupper for sending along this amazing video of yet another Mossad/Israeli/Zionist front organization out to tell Canada’s government and the people of Canada who the hell can come here and speak on issues of concern to Canadians! WHAT A DISGUSTING PILE OF BIGOTRY AND HYPOCRISY BY MP HARPER AND THE CONSERVATIVE GOVERMENT!!!

As Michael Rivero of http://whatreallyhappened.com rightly states:

The decision to ban George Galloway from Canada seems odd, but now it emerges that the Jewish Defence League (JDL) pressured the Canadian Government to do so. The action takes on sinister connotations for Canada, why? Because the Jewish Defence League are according to the FBI a Terrorist Group. In its report, Terrorism 2000/2001, the FBI referred to the JDL as a “violent extremist Jewish organization”. This “violent extremist Jewish organization” now it seems has power and influence over the Canadian Government.

Canadians are just waking up to the fact that Israel controls their government just as much as it does the USA. And note that inevitably, the Israeli shill has to fall back on the Holocaust to try to bludgeon his way through Galloway’s arguments. The good point is watching the Israeli whore thrashing around and clearly aware that he is losing the war for legitimacy in the public eye.]

Canada ban’s Irish MP: Galloway faces his Jewish Defence League (JDL) “Terrorist” accuser

PLEASE WATCH THIS AMAZING YOU TUBE OF THE ZIONIST THUG TRYING TO JUSTIFY HIS POSITION AND SPEAK FOR CANADIANS!!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fAm7rfHKSyY

—————————

http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/mar/20/george-galloway-banned-canada
George Galloway banned from Canada

• Anti-war MP banned on grounds of national security
• ‘This idiotic ban shames Canada,’ says Galloway

By Deborah Summers and agencies

Friday 20 March 2009

George Galloway: branded the decision ‘irrational, inexplicable and an affront to Canada’s good name’.
Anti-war MP George Galloway has been banned from Canada, it emerged today.

A Canadian spokesman confirmed that the Respect MP had been deemed inadmissible on national security grounds and would not be allowed into the country.

Galloway today branded the ban “idiotic” and vowed to fight the ruling with “all means” at his disposal. He is due to give a speech in Toronto on 30 March.

Earlier today the Sun said border security officials had declared Galloway, 54, “inadmissible” because of his views on Afghanistan and the presence of Canadian troops there and would be turned away if he attempted to enter the country.

A spokesman for Citizenship and Immigration Canada said the decision had been taken by border security officials “based on a number of factors” in accordance with section 34(1) of the country’s immigration act.

The act states:

“A permanent resident or a foreign national is inadmissible on security grounds for:

(a) engaging in an act of espionage or an act of subversion against a democratic government, institution or process as they are understood in Canada;

(b) engaging in or instigating the subversion by force of any government;

(c) engaging in terrorism;

(d) being a danger to the security of Canada;

(e) engaging in acts of violence that would or might endanger the lives or safety of persons in Canada; or

(f) being a member of an organisation that there are reasonable grounds to believe engages, has engaged or will engage in acts referred to in paragraph (a), (b) or (c).”

Galloway, MP for Bethnal Green and Bow, is consulting the organisers of his north American speaking tour and exploring whether legal action can be taken to overturn the ban.

Jason Kenney, Canada’s immigration minister, has the right to exempt people from the act if it is felt that their presence would not be “detrimental to the national interest”.

But a spokesman said Kenney would “decline to exercise that discretion” in Galloway’s case.

Alykhan Velshi, Kenney’s spokesman, said that the act was designed to protect Canadians from people who fund, support or engage in terrorism.

“We’re going to uphold the law, not give special treatment to this infamous street-corner Cromwell who actually brags about giving ‘financial support’ to Hamas, a terrorist organisation banned in Canada,” he said. “I’m sure Galloway has a large Rolodex of friends in regimes elsewhere in the world willing to roll out the red carpet for him. Canada, however, won’t be one of them.”

Responding to the news, Galloway issued a statement headed: “This idiotic ban shames Canada.”

The MP said: “This decision, gazetted in Rupert Murdoch’s Sun, is a very sad day for the Canada we have known and loved – a bastion of the freedoms that supporters of the occupation of Afghanistan claim to be defending.

“This has further vindicated the anti-war movement’s contention that unjust wars abroad will end up consuming the very liberties that make us who we are.

“This may be a rather desperate election ploy by a conservative government reaching the end of line, or by a minister who has not cottoned on to the fact that the George Bush era is over.

“All right-thinking Canadians, whether they agree with me over the wisdom of sending troops to Afghanistan or not, will oppose this outrageous decision.

“On a personal note – for a Scotsman to be barred from Canada is like being told to stay away from the family home.

“This is not something I’m prepared to accept.”

Galloway is due to speak at a public forum entitled Resisting War from Gaza to Kandahar, hosted by the Toronto Coalition to Stop the War later this month.

He is also due to speak at a second public forum in Mississauga, west of Toronto, on 31 March.

His proposed visit prompted the Jewish Defence League of Canada to write an open letter to the country’s government urging it to do “everything possible to keep this hater away”.

————-
http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2009/03/20/galloway-ban-canada-kenney.html

British MP barred from Canada

Friday, March 20, 2009 |
CBC News

[First part a repeat of article above and snipped here. Ed.]
Opposition questions ban

Liberal Leader Michael Ignatieff, speaking to reporters after a speech in Winnipeg Friday, said while he’s no fan of Galloway, people can’t be banned from Canada for what they may say.

“If he is being barred on free speech grounds that is an outrage,” said Ignatieff. “He can come to Canada and talk rubbish all day long as far as I’m concerned.”

But Ignatieff said Canadian security officials may know something he doesn’t.

“If there is a security threat, that is another matter,” he said.

NDP immigration critic Olivia Chow said the Conservatives have a pattern of suppressing those who have contradictory views.
“The minister of immigration is becoming the minister of censorship,” Chow told Canadian Press. “We don’t have to agree with everything Mr. Galloway talks about.

“But, at bare minimum, they should be allowed to express their points of view so Canadians can make decisions themselves. This is pure censorship and it’s wrong.”

Jewish groups pleased

Jewish organizations B’nai Brith and the Canadian Jewish Congress applauded the decision.

 B’nai Brith’s executive vice-president, Frank Dimant

________________________________________________

“We applaud the government for its explicit recognition that individuals who glorify terrorism and promote hatred be denied access into Canada,” said a statement from B’nai Brith’s executive vice-president, Frank Dimant.

Bernie Farber, CEO of the Canadian Jewish Congress, wrote: “George Galloway enables terrorism. In so doing he puts Canadian civilians at risk and comforts those who fight our soldiers in Afghanistan. The government’s decision was the right one from legal, security and moral viewpoints.”

Galloway was expelled from the Labour party in 2003 after publicly lashing out against British involvement in the Iraq war. Labour party officials said Galloway’s comments “incited foreign forces to rise up against British troops.”

He later helped form the anti-war Respect party.

—————

Editor’s Note:

The yahoo group Integrity BC was first started back on March 6th, 2004 by Arthur Topham and former Lawyer Jack Cram. Its purposes are outlined below. For a number of years I have been away from the site but it has, nonetheless pioneered on and persevered in its aims.

Regular contributors to the site ensure that it remains hard-hitting and controversial. A perusal of the latest posts involving former United Church Minister Kevin Annett will illustrate this comment.

Check it out and become a contributing member.

—————————–

The goals of INTEGRITY BC are:

1. To document, expose and eliminate all forms of corruption in B.C. with an emphasis on Government, Judicial and large corporations.

2. To restore faith, honour and integrity in the Rule Of Law.

3. To liaise, support and assist allied individuals, groups and coalitions.

4. To encourage proportional representation and effective accountability in government for the social, cultural, economic and healing benefit of all.

5. To create, promote, expand and share alternative communication networking via the web, newspapers, pamphlets, radio and t.v. for distribution of information, news and events reflecting IntegrityBC objectives and goals.

6. To foster and build a B.C. Peoples’ Movement as an effective independent watchdog to police ‘public’ and ‘political’ party policies and programmes.

7. To expand and to share these goals with other provinces and territories.

———————

Click to join IntegrityBC

What’s Next, “Zionism Denial”?
By Arthur Topham
March 4, 2009

The recent shackling and incarceration of Horst Mahler in Germany over charges of “Holocaust Denial” is the latest example of the degree of absurdity that this trend by the Zionist forces is leading mankind toward.

There is now occurring, worldwide, an ideological war (vaguely masked as a ‘religious’ one) between the forces of darkness and deceit and the forces of light and truth. It’s as simple (and yet, as complex) as that.

Following upon the heels of the other absurdity of this nature, that of Bishop Richard Williamson and the grossness and degree of the attack upon his name and his position within the beleaguered Catholic hierarchy by the Zionist zealot rabbis and their lackeys whose raison d’etre rests upon a professed foundational belief in their false messiah – the Holocaust god – the myth of Sillyness is thus taken to the nth degree of frivolity.

The fact that Zionist Jews everywhere are now, in unison, screaming out their proverbial Molochian chants for Bishop Williamson’s blood and for him to not only recant his early remarks concerning the “Big Six” but to go further in demands he swear an unquestioning obedience and belief in their brash idol of ash, is one more startling illustration of the fact that these Mad Hatters of Holocaustasia will stop at nothing short of absolute obeisance to the object of their perpetual sorrow and worship.

Viewing this recent trend by the Zionist Jews to attack the intellectual challenges brought on by the apostles of common sense who have the audacity and courage to question their self-chosen postulates regarding the “Holocaust” with a barrage of legally restricting legislation specifically designed to thwart not only reason but justice itself, one can only ask the most obvious question – what next?

The answer to that simple and natural query – an outcome of witnessing the historic examples of James Keegstra, and Doug Collins and Malcolm Ross and Ernst Zundel in Canada, Professor Robert Faurisson in France, Germar Rudolf of the USA, Sylvia Stolz, Juergen Graf, Gerd Honsik and Horst Mahler of Germany, historian David Irving of England and Dr. Fredrick Toben of Adelaide Institute in Australia (to name but a few of the more notable figures) – is to be found in the current battle now unfolding in Canada between myself, Arthur Topham and my website RadicalPress.com and the Zionist Jew lobby organization known as the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada.

I am being charged by B’nai Brith Canada under Canada’s Sec. 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act – a vile and specious bit of Orwellian outrage if ever there was one – that uses Canada’s “Hate crimes” laws to suppress and vilify anyone who questions any aspects of either Judaism, the political ideology of Zionism or the policies of the foreign state of Israel.

As crazy and illogical as it might first appear, the actual wording of the charge brought against me and my website is living proof that the Zionists are determined to establish in this “Human Rights” complaint now before the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal, a new and unique precedent that goes beyond even the magnitude of the medieval malfeasance found in their “Holocaust Denial” legislation.

This novel precedent is to be found in the specific wording of the complaint itself which the Canadian Human Rights Commission, in their infinite wisdom, deemed admissible and worthy of holding a Tribunal hearing to debate. Using Section 13(1) and its Interpretation(2),  of the CHR Act, B’nai Brith Canada stated in its complaint to the CHRC:

“The premise of this complaint is a contention that Arthur Topham and Radicalpress.com contrive to promote ongoing hatred affecting persons identifiable as Jews and/or as citizens of Israel.” [bold is mine]

If this “complaint” reaches its planned goal it will firmly establish as law, in the once free nation known as Canada, that no citizen of said country will be able to write anything on the Internet that is critical of the state of Israel – (remembering of course that Israel is a foreign country) – without taking the risk of being charged with committing a “Hate crime” under Canada’s federal Canadian Human Rights Act.

As the world already knows, the essence of Israel, its life-blood, rests upon the ideology known as political Zionism. Without Zionism’s fundamental tenets the state would not, could not, exist as it does in its present form. Logic thus leads one to the obvious conclusion. If it becomes a “Hate crime” in Canada to criticize Israel then to do so make it de facto of the same order of “Holocaust Denial” only in this new instance we would have to refer to it as “Zionism Denial”.

I needn’t burden readers with the endless avenues leading into absurdity that such a precedent would set, not only for Canada but for every nation in which the Zionist Jewish influence has gained currency.

Those of us Canucks here in the trenches battling to stop censorship of the Internet and the repression of freedom of speech are well aware that Canada is the experimental breeding-ground for Zionist legislation which inevitably curtails serious debate of all relevant political issues related to Zionist Jewish influence on western culture and its underlying institutional framework.

All alliteration aside, once they are able to get in to the law books the RadicalPress.com v. B’nai Brith Canada precedent it will open up a plethora of pandemic, pusillanimous and pestilent-stricken precedents the likes of which will make Pandora’s Box appear petite by comparison.

And like all of the poisonous programs designed to control our thoughts and our means of expressing them, this current case, should it prove to be another Zionist victory, will soon wend its way south into the heart of America to then challenge that final bastion of freedom of speech contained in the US Constitution – the 1st Amendment.

The time to stem this stream of Orwellian misery currently building up head in Canada is NOW. The place, CANADA. The method? Kill this serpent of censorship hiding within Sec. 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act by severing its head before yet another false god, in this instance one called “Zionism Denial”, is born from out of the dark depths of Mordor and turns its fierce fangs toward the light bringers with increased vengeance and hatred.

The light will never be overcome by the darkness but only if the people open their eyes to the clear and present danger that Zionism poses to all those who love freedom.
——

To assist in this cause you might write a letter of support for RadicalPress.com and address it to:

Nancy Lafontant
Registry Officer
Canadian Human Rights Tribunal
Nancy.Lafontant@chrt-tcdp.gc.ca

Please refer to File Number: T1360/9008

Please visit http://www.radicalpress.com for more articles and information on this subject.
———–

Arthur Topham is the Publisher and Editor of RadicalPress.com. He lives in central B.C. Canada with his wife and family and has been at the forefront of issues regarding social justice for the past forty years. He can be reached at radical@radicalpress.com

Dedicated to all who value the truth, free speech and are willing to sacrifice themselves on the “Highway of Public Controversy”

Hi Everyone, 

We are very excited to launch this Hard-Hitting, Pro-Family, Pro-Truth Radio show.

Please help us to make it a hit by forwarding this email to your list and then making a date with us tonight on RoadKill Radio!!!  It’s going to be fun and ohhhh so very needed!!!

With great appreciation for all you do!

Kind Regards,

Kari Simpson

————–

YES TODAY!!!!!!

RoadKill Radio Launches Online!!!!!

And You Are Invited!!

Hosts Kari Simpson & Terry O’Neill

Unabashedly Canadian, BOLD with No Apologies and oh yes, one more thing - we are pleased and determined to ensure those “Politically-Incorrect” voices that have been silenced are given an opportunity to be part of the debate and to have your voices heard!!

WHERE:         Listen live -     http://WWW.ROADKILLRADIO.COM

WHEN:          TODAY!!!  Tuesday March 3, 2009 @ 7:30 – 9:30 pm (PST)

CALL IN:        On-air telephone:      (604) 525-4167

EMAIL US:     roadkillradio@live.ca

TOPICS:

– The naughty Pro-Lifers who dared to exercise their right to free speech and have now been charged by the  University of Calgary with trespassing!

–  Polygamy, do we need to say more?….YES!

–  Gay Politics 101 and other Social Injustices – The Corren Agreement

Write a Letter for Freedom of Speech!

By Arthur Topham
March 1, 2009

Dear Free Speech Lover,

I, Arthur Topham and my website www.RadicalPress.com are in the midst of a legal battle with the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada over the issue of freedom of speech.

On November 20, 2007 I received confirmation from the Canadian Human Rights Commission (CHRC) that the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada (BBC) and its British Columbia representative, Harry Abrams, had co-joined to file a “complaint” with the CHRC on August 14, 2007 citing the infamous “Section 13” of the Canadian Human Rights Act, a specious and vague piece of legislation which states:

13. (1) It is a discriminatory practice for a person or a group of persons acting in concert to communicate telephonically or to cause to be so communicated, repeatedly, in whole or in part by means of the facilities of a telecommunication undertaking within the legislative authority of Parliament, any matter that is likely to expose a person or persons to hatred or contempt by reason of the fact that that person or those persons are identifiable on the basis of a prohibited ground of discrimination. [bold mine]

As this legislation was not all-inclusive enough for the “entrapment” purposes which the Zionist lobbies had in mind, immediately following the 9/11 attack and Canada’s hastily formulated Anti-terrorism Act, c.41 (passed December 18th, 2001) they were able to successfully lobby for the additional inclusion into Sec. 13(1) of the following “Interpretation(2)” which reads:

Interpretation
(2) For greater certainty, subsection (1) applies in respect of a matter that is communicated by means of a computer or a group of interconnected or related computers, including the Internet, or any similar means of communication, but does not apply in respect of a matter that is communicated in whole or in part by means of the facilities of a broadcasting undertaking.  [bold mine]

This Interpretation(2) of Sec. 13(1) was precisely what the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada and the Canadian Jewish Congress were waiting for. Now they had the legal pretext within which they could begin their assault upon any individual or group or website which they felt was a threat to the national interests of the state of Israel or its ideology, Zionism.

Using Section 13(1) and its Interpretation(2), B’nai Brith Canada stated in its complaint to the CHRC:

“The premise of this complaint is a contention that Arthur Topham and Radicalpress.com contrive to promote ongoing hatred affecting persons identifiable as Jews and/or as citizens of Israel.” [bold is mine]

In other words, these Jewish Lobby groups feel that it should be a “hate crime” to criticize a the foreign nation known as Israel. That is the unique precedent they are hoping to establish in this complaint to the CHR Commission.

The basis for the B’nai Brith Canada complaint was a series of 18 articles posted on RadicalPress.com. For purposes of this request I am short-listing an assortment of those cited below. Anyone wishing to see the full list can do so by going to the following url on the site and scrolling down. See http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=821  .

LIST OF ARTICLES USED IN B’NAI BRITH COMPLAINT TO CHRC:

http://www.radicalpress.com/?page_id=521
THE PROTOCOLS OF THE LEARNED ELDERS OF ZION

http://www.radicalpress.com?p=477
B’nai B’rith: Beating the anti-Semitic Drum
By Arthur Topham

http://www.radicalpress.com?p=468
Nationwide:  Racist Me
By Chris Cook

http://www.radicalpress.com?p=463
Let’s Talk About Jews And Elections
By Curt Maynard

http://www.radicalpress.com?p=459
The Seeds of Global Tyranny
By Arthur Topham

http://www.radicalpress.com?p=397
Judaism is Nobody’s Friend
By Mark Glenn

http://www.radicalpress.com?p=380
Elie Wiesel’s Holocaust Tale
By Eric Hunt

http://www.radicalpress.com?p=260
Judaism: A Conspiracy Against Jews, Humanity?
By Henry Makow

http://www.radicalpress.com?p=346
The Many Masks of Zionism
By Arthur Topham

The complaint was accepted by the CHRC and has moved through a series of stages culminating in a decision to pass it on to the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal (CHRT). Thanks to Sec. 13(1) and its Interpretation(2) these two quasi-judicial bodies – the commission and tribunal – now form what is, in essence, the yin and yang of Canada’s latest instrument of Internet censorship – one initially and supposedly designed to protect the rights of visible minorities and handicapped workers in the labour market – but now, thanks to 9/11 and the legal machinations of the pro-Zionist Lobby groups in Canada like B’nai Brith Canada, the Canadian Jewish Congress and the Simon Weisenthal Center, these two former bureaucratic organizations have shape-shifted into a lethal weapon designed to kill, via coercive, unjust legislation, Canada’s supreme right to freedom of speech on the net.

The current Tribunal stage involves holding a public hearing during which the complainant(s) and the respondent (myself and RadicalPress.com) will be given the opportunity to present our respective arguments.

As part of my defense I will be presenting a portfolio of letters from Internet users, both in Canada and around the world, who support the inherent right of all Canadians to freedom of speech on the Internet.

It goes without saying that the Internet, being an anarchic construct from its inception, knows neither centralized authority nor national boundaries thus providing an open and accessibility global forum and library in terms of freedom of information and the ability to express ones opinions in an atmosphere of neutrality and non-coercion.

But this once sacred domain is no longer safe and without immediate action by the blogosphere and Internet users in general its fate is to become more and more restricted and controlled by the Zionist forces now in control of all the rest of the world’s mainstream media.

Time is of the essence. I have until March 20th, 2009 to submit a Statement of Particulars to the Tribunal which is a description of the material facts that I intend to use in support of my arguments to have this vexatious charge thrown out. An important part of that evidence will be the letters of support submitted in my favour and in support of freedom of speech on the net.

So please, if you are concerned about this imminent threat to Internet censorship and the loss of freedom of speech in Canada then please take the time to scan the articles being attacked by B’nai Brith Canada, as well as others that are on the RadicalPress.com website and if you disagree with Sec. 13(1) then please write a letter to the Tribunal stating so.

Also, it is very important that you send me a cc copy of your letter at radical@radicalpress.com . It should be understood that in writing such a letter one ought to be civil and refrain from excessive and aggressive language. I will, in turn, use them in my struggle to help defeat this attack upon our most basic and cherished right as human beings living in a free society.

Please address your letter in support of RadicalPress.com and Freedom of Speech to:

Nancy Lafontant
Registry Officer
Canadian Human Rights Tribunal
Nancy.Lafontant@chrt-tcdp.gc.ca

Please refer to File Number: T1360/9008

CC a copy of your letter to:

RadicalPress.com
radical@radicalpress.com

Thank you for supporting Freedom of Speech in Canada. If you have any further questions regarding this matter please feel free to write me at radical@radicalpress.com .

Shine your Light for Love & Peace & Justice for All,

Arthur Topham
Pub/Ed
The Radical Press
Canada’s Radical News Network
radical@radicalpress.com
http://www.radicalpress.com
“Digging to the root of the issues since 1998”
——————————————————-

Aboriginal Leader David Ahenakew

______________________________

[Editor’s Note: RadicalPress.com would like to take this time to congratulate Lawyer Doug Christie on his successful defense of David Akenahew. It brings a ray of hope to those of us who are being intimidated and harassed by the Zionist lobby groups here in Canada to know that they are not always successful in accusing Canadians of “hate” crimes when such accusations are not warranted.]

http://www.thestar.com/News/Canada/article/591647

Ex-First Nations head acquitted in hate trial
Feb 23, 2009

THE CANADIAN PRESS

SASKATOON – A Saskatoon judge acquitted former aboriginal leader David Ahenakew Monday of wilfully promoting hatred against Jews.

The former head of the Assembly of First Nations was charged after a controversial speech and subsequent interview with a reporter more than six years ago. In the interview he called them a “disease” and appeared to justify the Holocaust.

Provincial court Judge Wilfred Tucker said the comments were disgusting but he didn’t believe Ahenakew intended to promote hatred.

It was the second trial for Ahenakew on the charge. He was found guilty the first time and fined $1,000. But the conviction was overturned on appeal and a new trial was ordered.

The 75-year-old testified at his second trial that he doesn’t hate Jews but still believes they caused the war.

His controversial comments date back to December 2002, when he delivered a rambling and fiery speech during a health conference organized by the Federation of Saskatchewan Indian Nations in Saskatoon.

During the speech, Ahenakew blamed Jews for causing the World War II. A newspaper reporter later asked him to clarify his comments.

“How do you get rid of a disease like that, that’s going to take over, that’s going to dominate?” Ahenakew responded. “The Jews damn near owned all of Germany prior to the war. That’s how Hitler came in. He was going to make damn sure that the Jews didn’t take over Germany or Europe.

“That’s why he fried six million of those guys, you know. Jews would have owned the God-damned world.”

Amid public outrage, Ahenakew lost his position as a senator with the Saskatchewan First Nations group. Following his initial conviction, he was also stripped of his Order of Canada.

Ahenakew testified at his most recent trial that he doesn’t hate Jews.

“Everybody says I’m a Jew-hater,” he told court. “I don’t hate the Jews, but I hate what they do to people.”

His defence lawyer, Doug Christie, argued Ahenakew got sucked into an argument with the reporter and did not intend for his spontaneous comments to be published.

Crown prosecutor Sandeep Bains told the court Ahenakew knew what he was doing and clearly consented to the media interview.

———–

DOUGLAS CHRISTIE - DEFENDER OF FREEDOM OF SPEECH

___________________________________________________
NEWS  RELEASE
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE FEBRUARY 23, 2009

INTERNATIONALLY RENOWNED CANADIAN FREE SPEECH LAWYER DOUGLAS CHRISTIE INTERVENES IN ABRAMS/B’NAI BRITH V. RADICALPRESS.COM HUMAN RIGHTS TRIBUNAL HEARING

QUESNEL, B.C. – Arthur Topham, Publisher and Editor of RadicalPress.com, says he received an email from the Victoria, B.C. Law Office of Douglas Christie on Friday, February 20th, 2009 confirming Mr. Christie’s interest in the current Canadian Human Rights Tribunal hearing process involving the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada v. Topham and his website RadicalPress.com (Complaint No.: 20071016).

In an email letter to Registry Officer Nancy LaFontant and Tribunal member Karen Jensen of the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal in Ottawa, Ontario Mr. Christie stated:

“I am general counsel of the Canadian Free Speech League, and as such I am interested in the case of Arthur Topham. I would like the opportunity to intervene on behalf of the free speech issues raised in this case. We were allowed intervention status in the case of Marc Lemire, and it is our desire to assist in the maintenance of a constitutional challenge to the enabling legislation, as well as to participate in the fact-finding that would be the foundation of such an assessment.”

Topham’s case first came to light back in November of 2007 when Harry Abrams, B.C. representative for the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada and his co-complainant the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada filed a complaint with the Canadian Human Rights Commission (CHRC) alleging that he, Topham, Owner, Publisher and Editor of RadicalPress.com was promoting “hatred toward Jews and citizens of Israel” because of articles on his website critical of both political Zionism and the actions of the foreign Jewish state of Israel.

Topham, who has publishing both a hard copy newspaper, The Radical (now defunct) and an online new site since 1998, said that after receiving the complaint back in November of 2007 he filed a hard-hitting, detailed, and thoroughly  documented 13-page Response http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=629 which he sent to CHRC “hate-team” investigator Sandy Kozak sandy.kozak@chrc-ccdp.ca on January 3, 2008.

On September 5, 2008 Topham received the Investigation Report from Ms. Natalie Dagenais, Director, Investigations Division. http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=785 . He was given until September 17, 2008 to comment on the Report. See: http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=786 .

On November 21, 2008 Topham received confirmation from the CHRC that the complaint would be moved to the Tribunal stage with the possibility of a hearing.

On January 14, 2009 Topham received an email from the CHR Tribunal requesting confirmation of whether or not he wanted to enter into a mediation process with the complainants. Topham declined to participate giving the Tribunal his reasons in a letter dated January 28, 2009. See: http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=893 .

With the Tribunal hearing now underway Topham said he was deeply honored to receive word that Mr. Christie had taken an interest in the case and was planning to intervene as General Counsel of the Canadian Free Speech League, a society that defends freedom of expression in Canada.

“No one accused of ‘hate speech’ could ask for or expect a better man of principle to stand by him than Doug Christie,” Topham said. “Mr. Christie has a well-deserved reputation world-wide as Canada’s most prolific defender of free speech, having appeared in the Supreme Court of Canada in that capacity more than any other counsel. Mr. Christie has been defense counsel for James Keegstra, Ernst Zundel, Malcolm Ross, John Ross Taylor, Tony McAleer, Imre Finta and in his most recent case that of First Nations leader David Ahenakew. And so it would be an understatement to say that I was both surprised and deeply grateful for the fact that Mr. Christie would take an interest in my case.”

As Doug Christie states on his website http://www.douglaschristie.com he has “challenged the powers of big government, the income tax department, big banking institutions, “human rights” commissions, social service bureaucracies, and other forces seeking at times to unjustifiably curtail the liberty of individuals.”

“Who could ask for a finer ally than that in my struggle with the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada and the censors within the Canadian Human Rights Commission and the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal,” Topham said.

“The root cause of all the legal problems facing writers, bloggers and publishers in Canada is the infamous Sec. 13(1) of the Canadian Human Rights Act. It’s the most specious piece of Orwellian legislation ever to have (dis)graced the law books of Canadian jurisprudence; one which prohibits truth and intent from entering into a person’s defense when such a complaint has been filed against them” Topham added, “and that is why I intend to also file a constitutional challenge to this undemocratic and draconian section of the CHR Act.”

-30-

CONTACT: Arthur Topham

Email: radical@radicalpress.com

Website: http://www.radicalpress.com

Home: 1-250-992-3479

ALL ALONE ON THE RIGHTS GRIDDLE
By Doug Collins

[Editor’s Note: I was reflecting on this piece this Sunday morning as I read it through. Here was a man of singular honesty, forthright and filled with courage at the age of 77, writing in defense of his sincere belief in the value of freedom of thought and expression. A man who had, at the age of 19, joined in fighting a war that he felt would keep the world free of the sorts of traitorous acts which, 58 years later, would return to haunt him and his work as a Canadian journalist (not to mention the rest of us free speech lovers).

That of course brought to mind Harry Abrams and the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada who were attacking everything that Collins had fought for (including escaping 11 times from Germany prisoner-of-war camps before the age of 25!) all of which was cause for rumination on my part and the recognition that in today’s world how cheap and taudry have become the old principles of respect for and admiration of our elders especially those who sacrificed so damn much in order that we Canadians of today would have the freedom to express our thoughts and ideas without fear of repression and harassment and imprisonment and fines.

This idea of this relatively young, baby-boomer Abrams and his co-conspirator the B’nai Brith, doing their damnedest to destroy the credibility and integrity of one of Canada’s true heroes I found to be exceedingly repulsive and contemptible.

My own Dad, born in 1918 only two years before Doug Collins and a man who also fought in WW2 against the supposed “fascists”, had he the requisite literary skills that Doug did, would likely have taken the same position of Collins on these very issues that Abrams and his pro-Zionist org B’nai Brith Canada are hell-bent on imposing upon the Canadian legal and political environment. When I look at Doug’s picture I also see my Father and become that much more incensed at the thought of what these anti-democratic, ungrateful and miserable, misinformed misanthropes are attempting to do to the most cherished of human values.

And for what I’m forced to ask? So that they can prevent Canadians from weighing the facts both pro and con as per the endless propaganda that’s been literally forced upon the minds of Canadians for decade upon decade? Hardly a justification for making critical analysis a crime.

Now these censors are not only unhappy with preventing “hatred toward Jews” in Canada. In addition to such a totalitarian/Bolshevik notion they also want to stop Canadians from extending any critical analysis to the foreign nation of Israel as well. How quaint. What next? No criticism of the Harper Conservatives or the Ignaiff (Jewish) Liberals or the Layton NDP or the May Greens because they all happen to be in the same bed with the Jewish Lobbyists like the CJC and the B’nai Brith and so in their orgies of appreciation for this racist, apartheid state and their blatant prostrations before their Zionist idol of innocence and endless persecution any protest of a frank and critical nature against them must also not be allowed to enter into the slipstream of Canadian thought? That, I propose, is the intent of this latest attack upon myself and RadicalPress.com. They’re out to set a new precedent in duplicious cowery, one that I could, and would, and will state is on par with Israel’s latest precedent-setting example of humanitarianism respecting their recent slaughter of the innocent Palestinian people of Gaza.

We must NEVER forget men like Doug Collins and what they spent their lives fighting for: the Free Will and God-given Right of every human being to express their deepest ideas and concerns without fear or threat or intimidation by others.]

————-
ALL ALONE ON THE RIGHTS GRIDDLE
By Doug Collins
July 20, 1997

from the North Shore News

North Vancouver, B.C.

Your man Doug is in trouble for saying that the “holocaust’s” six million story is  nonsense, that the biggest influence in Hollywood is the Jewish influence, and that the whole thing has become a business.

Which latter point was emphasized some time ago by the Chief Rabbi in the U.K. As they say in Israel, “There’s no business like Shoah (holocaust) business.”

So while we await the verdict of the Great Heresy Trial, [the one involving Harry Abrams and B’nai Brith Canada. A.T.] I want to ask a question. If the Commissars of Right-think don’t mind, that is. Or even if they do mind.

It is this: how come that I am the only one on the griddle?

A chap called Michael Enright shot his mouth off a couple of months back.

Enright, successor to Peter Gzowski on the ever-holy and blessed – by liberals – CBC Morningside, declared that next to the Mafia, the Roman Catholic Church was the biggest criminal organization around.

There were a couple of squeeks of surprise. But no witch hunt. Little old Michael was in safe hands.

Allan Fotheringham didn’t call him a monster.

The Sun’s Vaughn Palmer didn’t call him contemptible.

Writer David Mitchell didn’t call him anti-Catholic. Which, of course, is by no means as moral a sin as being “anti-Semitic”.

Nobody complained to the Ontario Human Rights Commission about Enright, either. But what do you think would have happened if I had said that those of the Jewish faith were the biggest bunch of crooks outside of the Mafia?

The sky would have fallen. It would have been a case for criminal prosecution under the hate laws. I would have been sued. And burned at the stake.

Take a look around you.

In Alberta a couple of years ago a small magazine publisher was roasted for complaining that the Hollywood film, The Last Temptation of Christ, was anti-Christian and blasphemous.

Jewish groups cried havoc. Supermarkets refused to carry the magazine. And the publisher went out of business.

But what’s this?

Here we have an American rabbi, Yechiel Eckstein, accusing Hollywood of “a very real and pervasive anti-Christian bias.”

A story to that effect was carried on the Ecumenical News International wire.

The rabbi belongs to the the Orthodox branch of the Jewish faith and is quoted as saying that in order to rectify the situation, Christians should put pressure on the film industry in the same way  as pressure has been put on American tobacco firms.

Writing in the North Jersey Jewish Standard he said that Hollywood had gone out of its way to portray evangelical Protestants and devout Roman Catholics in the worst possible light.

“The cherished symbols of their faith are put to blasphemous use,” he declared.

“If there is a Christian character in a film, he is usually depicted as a fool, a liar, a cheat, a diabolical murderer, or a crazy person. And if such images are allowed to accumulate without a response they could prove detrimental to faith and to Christianity.”

I pointed out years ago that you never saw a movie out of Hollywood that featured a bad Jew. For Hollywood, there aren’t any bad Jews.

Not to mention that Christianity, thanks mainly to “minority” pressures, has become a no-no in our schools and that the Christian cross cannot be shown in some public places.

As for the rabbi, I guess it would be OK for him to say these thing even if they had human rights tribunals in the U.S., which they do not. Comment is protected by the First Amendment so he could not be dragged before one.

There’s something else. In many movies WASPS generally are depicted as being sinister.

You might think they were all members of the KKK. Mississipi Burning was such a film.

If you ask me, and I know you haven’t asked me, my comments were like kid’s pap compared with what some other people have said.

I guess it all depends on who your friends are. And what is “right” and what is “wrong” in the halls of political correctness.
———-

Foreward to the Doug Collins book Here We Go Again!
By Doug Collins
1998

“The purpose of human rights commissions is clear: it is to harass dissidence and throttle all serious attempts to fight political correctness. In other words, don’t question immigration or suggest that not all immigrants are equal, and don’t criticize the politics of the pressure groups, who have been handed a deadly weapon. Do ridicule traditional Canada and support the ills that liberal flesh is heir to. We must all subscribe to liberal thought. Or else!”

~ Doug Collins

It brings a blush to my battle-hardened hide, but frankness forces me to confess that in 1997 I became the most discussed columnist in the country, thanks to the Canadian Jewish Congress and other would-be censors. But it still puzzles me that my harmless offerings could create a national furore and, in British Columbia, a media feeding frenzy.

Such are the joys of political incorrectness. Only a few years ago, when men were men, and liberals, homosexuals and feminists did not rule the roost like so many squawking chickens, the columns in question would never have raised an eyebrow.

For such critics I was the serpent in the Garden of the Politically Correct Eden. Sleepwalkers in the major media nodded their heads like clockwork Barbie dolls as your correspondent was put through the grinder, describing me as an anti-Semite, a racist, a dork, and other terms popular with people who profess to hate hate.

The immediate cause of those fulminations was the column “Hollywood Propaganda”, published in 1994 in Vancouver’s North Shore News. It led over three years later to a five-week hearing before a “human rights” tribunal, the inquisitors believing, obviously but in this case mistakenly, that the longer a person is on the rack the louder will he repent.

In the eyes of the provincial government and the Jewish Congress the column was “hate literature”. But neither it nor anything else I have written has been, or ever could be, the subject of a criminal prosecution under the federal hate laws. That much was admitted by Lisa Mrozinski, a lawyer representing the government side. She stated that the need for proof makes it difficult to get anywhere with such complaints in the courts. The implication was that no proof is needed in the NDP’s Alice in Wonderland hearings, where words mean what the inquisitors want them to mean.

A complaint, in effect a charge, leads to a politically appointed one-person tribunal in which an “adjudicator” is judge, jury and prosecutor.

(more…)

PROPAGANADA FROM B’NAI BRITH CANADA’S WEBSITE HOME PAGE:
Welcome to B’nai Brith Canada - Who we are? What we do?

B’nai Brith Canada is the independent voice of the Jewish community, representing its interests nationwide to government, NGO’s and the wider Canadian public.

Since 1875, it has been respected for its groundbreaking work on matters relating to antisemitism, racism and human rights, its strong advocacy on the pressing issues of the day….

Support B’nai Brith Canada

With the number of antisemitic incidents increasing almost threefold in the last five years, and a virtual explosion of internet hate fueling such anti-Jewish activity, the work of B’nai Brith Canada is more important than ever. Make your donation now.

———————
http://www.freedominion.com.pa/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=112629
CHRC: Abrams v Radical Press – Foreign Lobbyists

By Fourhorses

four_horses@warpmail.net

February 13th, 2009

In one of the correspondences from Arthur Topham, Publisher/Editor of the Radical Press, to Nancy Lafontant and Gregory M. Smith, Registrars at the CHRC, Topham raises the thought that Harry Abrams (complainant) is an agent for Israel’s Mossad. I think this is rather far fetched, especially after reading that Abrams is a business man in Victoria, who specializes in elevator advertising media. I haven’t seen any of his adverts in any elevators, so unless the Mossad is engaged in subliminal messaging to elevator guests, I would tend to heavily discount this theory.

This does raise a different issue, though. Part of the complaint claim is that the material Topham published at the Radical Press is likely to cause hatred towards Citizens of Israel. A poster on FD raised the question a while back as to what status does the State of Israel or its citizens have in Canadian judicial processes. That’s a very good question. It is not only the State of Israel, that is in question, but a bigger question pertaining to any foreign government. I understand there are diplomatic channels, procedures and protocols, and these are conducted through Foreign Affairs Canada and its diplomatic staff.

But what of this case?

There seem to be two complainants; Harry Abrams and B’nai Brith. How can they be complainants on behalf of Israeli citizens, which is the State of Israel? Are they registered lobbyists for a foreign government ?

(more…)