How Do Canada’s Hate Propaganda Laws Work Behind the Scene? The R vs Roy Arthur Topham Case By Arthur Topham

behindthescene

How Do Canada’s Hate Propaganda Laws Work Behind the Scene?
The R vs Roy Arthur Topham Case

By
Arthur Topham

September 25th, 2016

As the Constitutional challenge in the R vs Roy Arthur Topham case moves close to the hearing date of October 3 to 7, 2016 in Quesnel, BC’s Supreme Court it’s time Canadians were told how the methods of surveilling, complaining, charging, arresting and trying a Canadian citizen for such a flawed and unwarranted “crime” actually plays out behind the scene and not just what the mainstream media and courtrooms attempt to portray in order to lend credence to the charade in the eyes of the general public.

My example, given all that I’ve learned over the past decade about how the Zionist Jew lobby organizations operate in conjunction with the police forces and provincial and federal court systems here in Canada, is, I believe, fairly typical of how the process works.

I must preface the article by first stating that there were two individuals who were responsible for laying the “hate crime” complaints against myself and my website RadicalPress.com. That’s two people out of a population of 33,476,688 citizens (as of February 2012) who decided they didn’t like my website and wanted to have it destroyed. Due to a bail order issued by the the Honourable Provincial Court Judge R. D. Morgan on April 15, 2014 I am forbidden to “post on any internet site or otherwise publish the names of the two civilian complainants… and that he [me, Arthur Topham] immediately remove their names from any internet site he has direct or indirect control of. I find that there may be a risk of harm or intimidation in posting the names of these two civilian complainants.

Of the two complainants I can state that one is a Jew living in Victoria, BC who is (or was at the time) a regional director for the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada and the other is a lawyer living in Ottawa, Ontario who is not a Jew but has acted on behalf of Jewish lobby organizations in Canada for at least the past twenty years and is in all likelihood Canada’s Grand Champion of “hate crime” complainants. The Jew in Victoria I will refer to as “Agent Z” throughout the article and the non-Jew lawyer from Ottawa will be known as “Agent S”. The rest of the protagonists throughout the melodrama will have their real names cited as there is no court order prohibiting mention of them.

How the Ten Year Show Trial Played Out Behind the Scenes

My “hate crime” trials initially began on February 14th, 2007 (Valentine’s Day) and have gone through innumerable twists, contortions and transmutations that saw them morph from a Canadian Human Rights Act Sec. 13 complaint in November of 2007 to a Criminal Code of Canada (CCC) Sec. 319(2) complaint in May of 2012 that resulted in my arrest on the Barkerville Hwy near Quesnel, BC and my incarceration in the Quesnel jail. From there it went to a further three years of ongoing legal wrangling that eventually resulted in a trial in BC Supreme Court in Quesnel that commenced on October 26th, 2015 and ended on November 12th with the jury finding me Guilty on Count 1 and Not Guilty on Count 2. Both Counts of course were identical.

As I said it began on Valentine’s Day when Agent Z sent me an email under a false alias calling himself “Brian Esker”. He accused me of publishing all sorts of materials on my website that he stated were “anti-Semitic” and “hateful” demanded that I take them down then let him know when I had and he would send me a list of more articles to take down. Of course he never stated which articles he wanted removed other than to mention the fact that I had The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion on my site and that was verboten as far as he was concerned.

I civilly and politely attempted to find out who “Brian Esker” really was but “Brian” refused to communicate any further with me and I never heard a thing more until I received a letter in my mailbox from the quasi-judicial Canadian Human Rights Commission (CHRC) back on November 20, 2007 that contained a Sec. 13 “hate crime” complaint first filed with the (CHRC) back on August 14, 2007. That’s when I first learned that the skulking, serpentine troll who wrote me on Valentine’s Day was in fact Agent Z of the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada, the same foreign, false flag organization that’s been recently attacking German-Canadian citizens Monika Schaefer and Brian Ruhe and also doing its damnedest to slander and libel Professor Anthony Hall of Lethbridge University with false accusations in order to have him fired from his tenured professorship.

By 2008 I was coming out swinging and refusing to back down to the spurious accusations brought on by this agent of Israel. The CHRC decided that they had another victim and referred my case to the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal (CHRT) which was another total gong show of misfits and miscreants who must have thought they were living in Stalin’s Soviet Russia back in the 1930’s and would pull any dirty trick they could think of to intimidate and torture their victims.

But I learned something else back in 2008 regarding Agent S. This snake in the Zionist grass hadn’t filed a Sec. 13 complaint with the CHRC when Agent Z did but he was personally known to Agent Z at the time. I only found out when both of them threatened Black Press (not affiliated with Conrad Black) the publisher of my local community newspaper The Quesnel Observer with a law suit because the paper was publishing my side of the story. Agent Z was going ballistic and phoning the newspaper and threatening the editor and being his belligerent, arrogant, Zionist self. So both these agents were working in tandem from day one.

The whole CHRC and CHRT charade carried on right up until the Conservative government finally repealed the Sec. 13 law in June of 2012. Fortunately for me there were other victims ahead of me and by the time my turn came up the case was stayed due to it being repealed.

But the end of Sec. 13 didn’t stop the two Israeli agents from pursuing their goal of harassment of myself and my website. The second time they came after me it was prompted by Agent S, who, by the way, was also a former employee of the Canadian Human Rights Commission. I had just published an article called Hating Harper on April 27, 2011. The following day Agent S filed his Sec. 319(2) complaint with the next player in this freedom of speech farce, Det. Cst. Terry Wilson of the BC Hate Crime Team, centred in Surrey, BC.

On May 28th, 2011, precisely one month later, I published my controversial satire of Theodore N. Kaufman’s 1941 pro-German genocide book, Germany Must Perish! I called it Israel Must Perish! The very next day Agent Z filed his Sec. 319(2) “Hate Propaganda” complaint with Det. Cst. Terry Wilson and the Hate Crime Unit in Surrey.

gaywilsonlevasimage

Enter the Queer-Jew Connection

There are aspects to the R v Roy Arthur Topham criminal case that have yet to be revealed to the general public since this Stalinist Show Trial began almost a decade ago and had it not been for the Liberal government’s lamentable decision to threaten, via the use of Sec. 319(2), the decent folks of Canada now outraged at their government’s degrading attempt to drag the nation down into the mire of mendacious sexual masochism, these revelations may never have surfaced. But they have and so I must share now what has thus far remained hidden from the general public.

It was soon after I was arrested on May 16th, 2012 while my wife and I were traveling to Prince George on placer mining business that I found out that Det. Cst. Terry Wilson, who was leading the BC Hate Crime Team in their tireless efforts to hunt down “haters” on the Internet, was a queer. Then, as my court case carried on and further revelations occurred I also learned while cross-examining Det. Wilson during the Preliminary Inquiry back in January of 2014 that Det. Wilson had first joined the London Ontario Police Service back in 1989 and then their hate crime unit in 1995. But more importantly was the fact that as far back as 1996 Det. Wilson was already working on similar cases such as mine with the same Agent S who initially filed the first Sec. 319(2) complaint against me!

Det. Cst. Wilson has since retired from the New Westminster Police Force and has suddenly morphed into a “Hate Crime Expert” even though in court he swore under oath that he wasn’t a hate crime expert. His website http://www.hatecrimeexpert.com/ contains all the essential ingredients showing Wilson’s former connections with the Jewish lobbyists and other unsavoury characters.

screen-shot-2016-09-26-at-7-54-57-am

Now I don’t have any proof that Agent S is a homosexual or not. I do know that I’ve seen his photo on the net numerous times and read much that he’s written on his website but I’ve never seen or heard of him either having a girlfriend or being married. All I do know is that he and Wilson have been conspiring to hunt down Canadians for the past twenty years and charge them with “hate crimes”. As for Agent Z out of Victoria, BC, he’s also been working in concert with these same two “hate” hunters for at least a decade and most likely longer. Being a married man with a family it’s doubtful that Agent Z is a queer but regardless it’s no secret that the Jewish lobby has been pushing the Queer agenda in the courts and through the media for decades.

So here we have this Zionist triune of truant “hate crime” agents all directly connected up with B’nai Brith Canada and its ADL arm the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith hell-bent on accusing Arthur Topham of promoting “hatred” against people of “Jewish ethnicity” and attempting to get the jury to believe that my satire of the Jewish book Germany Must Perish! was a blatant attempt to convince the Canadian public to genocide “the whole of the Jewish population”. Did the jury buy the argument put forth by Crown counsel Jennifer Johnston during the trial that this was in fact why I wrote the satire? God only knows because the jury is under strict orders not to reveal why they found me Guilty of one count of promoting hatred and then Not Guilty of the second and identical count.

The upcoming Charter challenge to this Zionist-created legislation will argue that Sec. 319(2) is an unacceptable infringement on Sec. 2b of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms and ought to be struck down. It will be of interest to anyone concerned about their right to open debate and freedom of speech because if these “Hate Propaganda” laws contained in Sections 318 to 320 of the Criminal Code of Canada aren’t repealed you can bet your bottom dollar that there will be more and more innocent Canadians charged and arrested, their homes invaded by these goon squads of “Hate Crime Units”, all their computers and electronic files stolen and God knows what else, all at the behest of these foreign interlopers disguising themselves as Jewish “lobbies” so that they can then infiltrate and poison the Canadian judicial system via their clandestine pressuring and media control in order to prevent their own crimes and the criminal activities of the state of Israel from being revealed on the Internet.


Please help out with the costs of the upcoming Charter hearing by going to the following website and making a donation.

gogetfunding.com/canadian-publisher-faces-jail-for-political-writings

Quesnel Cariboo Observer runs Front Page story on Topham Constitutional Challenge to Sec. 319(2) by Autumn Macdonald

ObserverHeadlines

OBSERVER STORY FOR JULY 15TH, 2016
Topham challenges hate crime legislation

AUTUMN MacDONALD
Observer Reporter

Close to nine months after he was found guilty of one count o promoting hatred and not guilty to the second charge, Arthur Topham is calling on the abolishment of the sections in which he was charged under.

Hate crime legislation under Criminal Code of Canada sections 319 – 320 will be under review during Topham’s trial to challenge the charter the week of Oct. 3 of this year. The trial is expected to last a week.

Topham is aiming to raise some of the following issues during the trial:

• Section 319(2) of the Criminal Code constitutes an infringement of Section 2(b) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
• The Crown bears the onus of justifying the infringement of Charter rights on a case-by-case basis.
• Criminal prosecution by indictment is not a minimal impairment of the Applicant’s Charter rights.
• The infringement of the Applicant’s Charter rights is disproportionate to any possible salutary effect that Section 319(2) could have in the circumstances of this case.

But most importantly, and to the point, Topham said, is that Section 319(2) of the Criminal Code constitutes an infringement of Section 2(b) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms which states:
“Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms: …
(b) freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication …”

“I’m hopeful that the court will realize the danger of this legislation when it can be applied to any materials that are easily accessible on other websites,” Topham said.

“The threat of incarceration and a criminal record are very serious actions to take in this day and age when the Internet is fast  becoming the primary medium for freedom of expression.”

——

Source

Letter to Editor, Quesnel Cariboo Observer: Witnessing the dismantling of our freedoms By Al Romanchuk

ATEditorPic185

Dear Reader,

The following letter, written by Al Romanchuk of Edmonton, Alberta and published in the Quesnel Cariboo Observer on Wednesday, December 2, 2015, is a superlative testament, not only to the courage, willingness and sagacity of the writer but also to the strength of heart and integrity of the editor of this community newspaper, Autumn MacDonald for having the strength of conviction to put into print the truth of what Canadians now face in terms of a clear and dire threat to their Constitutional right to freedom of expression on the Internet.

It is with a profound sense of gratitude that I thank both these individuals and the publisher, Black Press for taking the lead and providing the rest of the country’s mainstream media with a positive example of what a newspaper can do, no matter its size, to stand up for an individual’s right to express their opinions and beliefs as provided in Canada’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

Please pass this letter on to your friends and associates.

Note also that you can access the editions of the Quesnel Cariboo Observer by going to the following url: http://issuu.com/search?q=Quesnel,+BC

Sincerely,

Arthur Topham
Pub/Ed
The Radical Press
Canada’s Radical News Network
“Digging to the root of the issues since 1998”
––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

AlRomanchuk'sLet2CaribooObserver

DOUBLE CLICK ON THE IMAGE TO ENLARGE. YOU MAY HAVE TO DO IT TWICE.

So much Canada, so little time by Jerry MacDonald, former Publisher & Editor of the Quesnel Cariboo Observer

Screen Shot 2015-11-17 at 8.11.42 PM

Untitled

PUNCHLINES
By
Jerry MacDonald
February 26th, 1997
OPINIONS
So much Canada, so little time!
ATEditorPic185
[Editor’s Note: My hometown newspaper, the Quesnel Cariboo Observer has been in the news a lot lately thanks to the ongoing court case involving yours truly. As a result of the guilty verdict in Count 1 of the Sec. 319(2) criminal charge, many supporters unfamiliar with the local area where I’ve lived now for the past 45 years are rather upset over the fact that the 12 person jury of my peers had reached such a guilty verdict, concluding that I’d been betrayed by my fellow community members. I don’t believe this is the case but rather a result of Crown’s deliberate strategy of unloading thousands of pages of “evidence” upon an unsuspecting group of jurors who, in all likelihood, had never before had to deal with such a monumental (thought crime) issue and were totally unprepared for the volume of materials they were suddenly given to read and deliberate upon. That, coupled with Crown’s over-riding insistence throughout the trial that my satire of Germany Must Perish! which I titled Israel Must Perish! was, in fact an actual book; one which I personally had written with evil intent to promote genocide of the whole of the Jewish population, obviously prejudiced the jury into believing Crown’s false accusations against me.

But, even so, the fact that I was found guilty in Count 1 isn’t reflective of the attitude and feeling toward myself by the community of Quesnel as a whole. And this is why I want to share with you an opinion piece by the late Publisher and Editor of the Quesnel Cariboo Observer, Jerry MacDonald who wrote the following article back on February 26th, 1997. Tragically, the following year on January 29th, 1998, just five months prior to the start up of my publishing business The Radical Press, Jerry MacDonald died of a heart attack at the early age of 44 years. Today, 21 years after his untimely death, his prophetic words regarding freedom of expression and the fear of people to speak out take on a prescient quality of their own. Jerry’s mention of myself in his article, is, I believe, a more true reflection of the sentiment of the bulk of the people here in the Cariboo who have known of my work for many decades.]

So much Canada, so little time!

“Journalism has taught me that, for the most part, the people who speak out in their youth … are the ones who will continue to speak their minds when their Canada Pension Cheques bounce.”

~ Jerry MacDonald

AS YOU READ this, I should be skating my way through the Rockies in my newer-old four-by-four Ford truck.

I’ll be in full retreat from those damned daily deadlines we were talking about earlier this month. Stan Rogers will be belting out tunes on the stereo – oh, maybe Barrett’s Privateers. And as I slip the front axle into four-high in anticipation of that black-hearted black ice, Stan and I will be wailing the chorus at the top of our respective lungs: “Goddam them all!…”

You’ve got to know Stan Rogers to follow what it is that I’m talking about here. And that’s part of what is wrong with this country of ours: too few people know of Stan Rogers.

His a guy with a voice that could make a cod fisherman smile – even today. Stan’s dulcet tones capture the energy of Canada, its solitude, our triumphs, our pain.

Had he been a separatist, his songs alone could have rallied Quebec to votez oui long ago. But Stan’s dead now. A great nationalist, a poet and a bear of a man with a Quaker’s beard and a Mop ‘n Glo pate. He had a voice from heaven. And that’s where its gone, presumably.

But he’ll be with me in the Rockies as I think about you. About Quesnel.

As Stan leads and I do an acceptable job of backup Highway mumble-harmony, what left of my mind will reflect on home and the people who make it special. And those who don’t.

So in a round-about way by introduction, this is one of those “thank you & good night” columns. And one of those “be warned” pieces too.

Journalism has taught me many things. Some of which I have actually, consciously retained.

It has taught me that if we are lucky enough, we will grow old enough to be bold enough.

In other words, most of us go through life pretty much afraid in this free society of ours to speak our minds. We’re afraid for two reasons:

In rural Canada if you speak your mind at a meeting of some kind you’re apt to be elected president. That alone is a practical inducer of self-censorship:

“You, Mouthy One! We the membership find you guilty of opinionationextravaganzi. You are hereby sentences to a two-year term as president of the Quesnel Teacher’s Association …”

You could plug in the name of your own outfit here, but the point is taken.

And so Murphy’s Law being what it is, the “intelligent members” stay home and the wannabes of the world, with the anaemic anatomy complex, take over. Now this is not true in all cases, but from politics to unions to management – it’s scary sometimes to consider just how prevalent it is.

I ramble. But you’re used to it, otherwise you wouldn’t have read this far.

When it comes to really important issues in life, however, the biological verbal governor kicks in out of fear: We’re afraid if we speak out because it could affect our jobs; the possibility for promotion; our social standing; our kids’ chances of playing on the rep team; of being branded a racist; a sexist; a capitalist; a red neckist; an environmentalist…

We’re so paranoid of being branded some kind of an ‘ist’ we’ve forgotten the ‘s’ altogether. And that’s what we’ve become: the most free society in the world, afraid to speak out because it might cost us something.

So, like a smoker waiting for a pack of butts to hit $20 before she quits, we wait to be ‘old enough to be bold enough‘. We wait for that time when we’re beholden to no-one.

Trouble is, when that day dawns most of us are dead, or too old to give a damn. Rather we spend what energy we have at the time squeezing the remote or chewing our apple sauce.

Journalism has taught me that, for the most part, the people who speak out in their youth (Youth: Any age between 30-64, a definition which changes as the amount of ear hair in the definer increases) are the ones who will continue to speak their minds when their Canada Pension Cheques bounce.

So I’d like to thank the following people for speaking out over all these years – even when it wasn’t politically correct to do so.

Arthur Topham, Bert de Vink, Judy Campbell, Jude Davis and Doug Gook: Think what you like of their politics, priorities, or values – these people often served as the conscience of the area during the 1970s, 80s and 90s. Right or wrong, they spoke their minds. They stood up for their beliefs.

In a generation that vowsd to be different from our parents, how many of us can truly say that today? They will always have my admiration because right or wrong they are people of conviction.

To Joan Huxley, Harvey Bryant, Susan Maile, John Maile, Andy Sear, Mary Glassford, Gloria Lazzarin, Bob Taft, the late Albert Johnston, the late Alex Fraser, former mayor Mikey Pearce, Ted Armstrong, former Rec Director Dale MacDonald … to all of these people we owe a debt of gratitude. Because they are been the builders in these past 20 years.

The $15 million hospital expansion; River-front Trail; building of the Rec Centre; expansion of the Civic Arena; Alex Fraser Park; the Senior’s Centre; Golden Centre – they were the eyes of the vision that has become our reality. They spoke out.

Politically, Quesnel has been assigned Lepper Colony status since Alex Fraser’s death. We are lacking not only in vision, but in integrity, credibility and – most of all – brain-pans.

Clenched in a ‘what’s in it for me’ and ‘this will look good on my portfolio’ mentality, our current  collection of potential senators have a hard time managing their own cheque books. But we’ll elect them to office and as spenders of the public purse.

MLA John Wilson is a possible exception – but John’s inability to speak in public is why guys like Dale Carnegie are billionaires.

These are the things one ponders while dodging big horned sheep and docile elk as Stan warbles away in the background, something about the Northwest Passage.

As long as the Lance Leas, and Brian Rankins, and Herb Bardens and Bob Normans and Betsy Van Haldrens and Collin Almonds of the community stay home at nomination & election time, we’ll continue to send the political equivalent of War Amps to the front lines in our battle for our future.

The sad part is we’re really no different than the rest of Canada.

We have a great community, an unbelievably beautiful province and an extremely special country. While we collectively seem to be doing our best to screw it all up, having apparently signed a long term mortgage, with the Bank of Stupid, we survive despite ourselves.

Maybe when we’re all old enough and bold enough, we’ll look back and chuckle and shake our heads at our paranoia. Cuz everything works out in the end. Cuz nothing really matters much anyhow. Maybe.

Then again, maybe we’ll all be sitting in our wheel chairs, our grey pony tails plagued by split ends, our bony shoulders littered with dandruff … and finally we’ll all join Stan in toothless harmony:

“Goddam them all…!”

—-

Report on first week of Supreme Court Trial R v Roy Arthur Topham by Arthur Topham

Screen Shot 2015-11-01 at 12.18.21 PM

ATEditorPic185

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[EDITOR’S NOTE: Please feel free to use whatever information is contained in this Report in order to spread the word further afield. Now that the first week of the trial has ended and there’s been no mention of it in Canada’s mainstream media, other than the local Quesnel Cariboo Observer, I believe it’s fair to assume that the mainstream news outlets in this country have collectively decided to censor the case in order that the Canadian public remains unaware of the importance of what’s occurring in British Columbia.

Given the importance of this trial to every citizen of the nation who values their constitutional right to freedom of expression and also considering the wide-spread media coverage over the years leading up to the final repeal of the Sec. 13(1) legislation as contained in the Canadian Human Rights Act in June of 2012, it’s highly unlikely that the msm is unaware of the fact that this trial is happening.

It’s therefore up to the alternative news media to do its best to cover this important historic event in Canadian jurisprudence and bring it to the attention of internet readers.

Because of the nature of the case and for obvious reasons of strategy I’ve kept the details of the proceedings to a bare minimum. Rest assured though that at the trial’s end which could be at the end of the coming week (November 6th) a more thorough analysis of the trial will be forthcoming.

Thank you.]

——–

 

To Alternative Media Sources 

Report on first week of 

Supreme Court Trial R v Roy Arthur Topham 

 by 

Arthur Topham

The Supreme Court “Hate Speech” trial of Arthur Topham and his website RadicalPress.com concluded its first week of deliberations on Friday, October 30th, 2015 in the small, central interior city of Quesnel, British Columbia.

Having elected to be tried by a jury of his peers rather than gamble on the Attorney General’s office selecting a potentially biased justice to oversee the proceedings and decide his fate the first order of business was to select twelve individuals from around the local community to sit on the jury. This process of selection meant that well over a hundred individuals were called to appear at the provincial government office on the morning of Monday, October 26th.

As well, and contrary to its normal behaviour over the past three and a half years, it was also at this time that Crown decided to initiate a rather Orwellian practise of setting up a RCMP screening process within the building which required every individual entering to have to go through a security check prior to gaining access to the courts. This entailed the removal of all of one’s personal possessions such as wallets, purses, cell phones, etc from their pockets and placing them in little plastic baskets and then walking through a scanner and having an RCMP officer go over your whole body with a hand-held wand to determine whether you might have a concealed weapon or possibly explosives(?) strapped to your body with the intent of committing an act of “terrorism”. Given the undue inconvenience of this intimidating process one can only imagine that it may have been designed by Crown to discourage the local citizenry from attending the trial and observing its proceedings.

Len Rudner copy

In addition, considering the fact that Crown’s star Expert witness was Len Rudner, former Director of the Canadian Jewish Congress (CJC), it was highly likely that the additional security measures were part of the conditions upon which Mr. Rudner consented to appear. This was further corroborated by the fact that while Mr. Rudner was in attendance he was constantly accompanied by a police bodyguard.

Meanwhile the crowd of potential jurors were forced to line up outside and wait in the snow and sleet as each one of them went through the onerous security process.

The Show Begins

Crown’s first witness was now retired Det. Cst. Terry Wilson who, at the time of my arrest and incarceration on May 16th, 2012, was the lead investigator for the BC Hate Crime Unit located in Surrey, B.C., a suburb of Vancouver. Wilson, along with his partner Cst. Normandie Levas and a team of other police officers, had, after investigating complaints from two individuals back in 2011 that I and my website RadicalPress.com were contravening Sec. 319(2) of the Criminal Code of Canada by “communicating statements, other than in private conversation, willfully promote hatred against an identifiable group, people of the Jewish religion or ethnic origin” decided to charge and arrest me for the promotion of “hate propaganda”.

Wilson&LevasPhoto copy 4

The focus of Crown’s evidence consisted of four large binders of which Binder #1 and #2 composed the complete texts of the following online books which are posted on RadicalPress.com:

1. Germany Must Perish! by Theodore N. Kaufmann

2. Israel Must Perish! (erroneously labeled by Wilson and Crown as a “book” rather than a satirical article)

3. The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion

4. The Biological Jew by Eustice Mullins

5. The Jewish Religion: Its Influence Today by Elizabeth Dilling

Binder #2 was the complete text of Douglas Reed’s masterful historic analysis of political Zionism The Controversy of Zion.

The remaining two binders contained numerous posts and Editorial comments by Topham. The majority of material being that produced by authors other than the accused.

It wasn’t until the end of Wednesday, October 28th that Crown completed her testimony from former Det. Cst. Terry Wilson. The following morning, Thursday, October 29th at 10:26 a.m. Arthur Topham’s Defence Counsel, Barclay Johnson had the opportunity to cross-examine Wilson on his three day of testimony.

Court adjourned at 4:05 p.m. and Mr. Topham, his Attorney Barclay Johnson and a number of supporters, including Mr. Topham’s wife proceeded across the street from the Courthouse to the Billy Barker Hotel where all of the out-of-town visitors were staying to await the arrival of Topham’s Expert Witness Mr. Gilad Atzmon, who was due to arrive at the Quesnel airport at 4:00 p.m. that same day.

TophamLegalTeam

Mr. Atzmon is an Israeli-born writer, musician, and political commentator who has written extensively about global politics, and specifically the geopolitical role of the State of Israel. Atzmon is critical of the Israeli government and its approach to other countries in the Middle East. He moved to England in 1994 and became a British citizen in 2002.

AtzBkCov

Day five of the trial began Friday, October 30th, 2015. Crown’s Expert Witness Mr. Len Rudner testified throughout the whole of the day. Cross examination of Mr. Rudner will begin Monday, November 2nd.

•••0•••

Please help out with my upcoming Sec. 319(2) “Hate Propaganda” trial that commences in one week on October 26th by making a donation.

Donations can be made online via my GoGetFunding site located at http://gogetfunding.com/canadian-publisher-faces-jail-for-political-writings/ or else by sending cash, cheques or Money Orders to the following postal address.

Please make sure that any cheques or Money Orders are made out to – Arthur Topham – and sent to:

Arthur Topham
4633 Barkerville Highway
Quesnel, B.C.
V2J 6T8

Long Road to Justice: the Ongoing Saga of Lonnie Landrud and the RCMP Murder of Deena Lyn Braem by Arthur Topham

LonnieStoryHdr

A recent article in the August 27th, 2015 edition of the Quesnel Cariboo Observer by Reporter Annie Gallant titled “Time to Take Back the Night” focused once again upon the issue of Quesnel’s missing and murdered women.

In an unpublished letter to the editor I had written:

“Observer reporter Annie Gallant states in her article that ‘The message of Take Back the Night has never been more poignant in Quesnel than this year as the community prepares to add two more names to the list of 11 murdered and missing women.’

In this same article Women’s Resource Centre administrative coordinator Sheila Norquay is quoted as saying, ‘Men must take a leadership role in changing how other men view women and thus treat women.’

Both of these statements are inappropriate and misleading given the facts surrounding the missing women here in Quesnel as well as those murdered and missing along the infamous “Highway of Tears” stretching from Prince George west to Smithers along Hwy 16.

In Quesnel there was never a more “poignant” time for resolving this longstanding issue than back sixteen years ago when, in September of 1999, 17 year old Deena Lyn Braem was murdered right here in Sugar Loaf Ball Park in West Quesnel.

The primary reason why this case (along with all the others) was never resolved was because the RCMP themselves were complicit in both the murder and its subsequent cover up.”

Sixteen years have now passed since that tragic night when both Deena Lyn Braem’s and Lonnie Gabriel Landrud’s fate were sealed. Deena died needlessly and had Lonnie Landrud not been a cigarette smoker in need of a puff his life may have ended up taking a totally different path from what it did due to the ultimately traumatic scene that he witnessed.

On route to purchase some smokes Lonnie decided to take a short cut from the trailer park where he was staying and walk over to the local 7/11 store never thinking that on his way through the park he would stumbled upon a gruesome murder scene that’s haunted, tormented and endangered his life ever since.

What Lonnie Landrud witnessed, according to his subsequent allegations, were two RCMP officers, one a female (Cst. Bev Hosker – now diseased) and the other a male (Cst. Paul Collister) in the act of murdering a young teenager by the name of Deena Lyn Braem who had recently been reported by the Missing Children Society of Canada as having gone missing on September 25th, 1999.

After the shock of what he had experienced and purchasing his smokes Lonnie returned to the trailer where he was “house sitting” and proceeded to do what he felt was the only right thing – he called 911 and reported the incident.

The outcome of that momentous decision turned into a sixteen year uphill battle with every conceivable level of government and media to try and have the incident properly investigated and the two RCMP officers involved brought to justice. It also turned into a separate and immediate struggle for Lonnie Landrud to try and stay alive for while having performed his civic duty as a Canadian citizen he now has had fourteen separate attempts on his life since that mind-altering 911 phone call back in 1999.

RadicalPress.com has covered the ongoing saga of Lonnie Landrud for a number of years beginning back in February of 2012 when his story (in video format) first appeared on the site. Subsequent articles and videos have also appeared in November of 2012 in January of 2014 and again in April of 2015. In particular the January 27th, 2014 publication of a letter sent to the following public figures outlines in great detail the laborious efforts which Mr. Landrud has undergone in order to have his concerns formally addressed:

To the Honourable Members:

Stephen Harper, Prime Minister; Thomas Mulcair, Opposition Leader; Vic Toews, Federal Public Safety Minister; Rob Nicholson, Federal Solicitor General; Christy Clark, Premier of B.C.; Adrainne Dix, Leader, B.C. Opposition Party.

As he stated then in his opening remarks, “I again find myself having to write to you the leaders of Canada and British Columbia to try and put a stop to the attempts on my life by a group of RCMP members and their paid informants.”

The determination on the part of Mr. Landrud to seek justice and stay alive while doing so is the stuff that movies were once made of.

 

LonnieGabrielLandrud-1 copy

Coupled with his ongoing efforts to secure an independent investigation was the later startling admission by Landrud that he had actually shot the RCMP officer who he swears he saw murder the young victim. When the officer in question, Cst. Paul Collister of the Quesnel RCMP detachment, attempted to break into Lonnie’s home in 2003, four years after the crime, in the process of doing so he was wounded by Landrud who shot him in the left arm with a shotgun loaded with #4 birdshot causing serious physical damage to the officer. Since that time Landrud has been doing everything humanly possible to have the shooting incident investigated and the medical records for Cst. Collister revealed in order to substantiate his claim that he actually did shoot the officer.

Until the substantial evidence which Mr. Landrud possesses has been fully and neutrally investigated by a body totally independent of the RCMP and both the federal and provincial Attorney General’s offices and any other related government body ostensibly designed to investigate police wrong-doing, the missing women of Quesnel and everywhere throughout B.C. and across Canada will continue to remain subject to this legacy of ongoing tragedy and travesty of justice.

Having recently been the subject of yet another physical attack in the form of unknown assailants attempting to shoot Lonnie while he was out working on his ranch Landrud once again tried approaching the authorities, this time public figures in his local home city, in another attempt to have this ongoing travesty of justice addressed.

I received a phone call from Mr. Landrud around the end of September. He told me that he had made arrangements to have a meeting on Monday, October 5th with Quesnel Mayor Bob Simpson and the local head of the RCMP in Quesnel, Staff Sergeant Andrew Burton and City Manager Byron Johnson in the Mayor’s office at City Hall to discuss his concerns. Lonnie asked me if I would come along as a witness. I agreed to attend the meeting. As well as myself Lonnie also asked a mutual friend of ours, Mr. Frank Frost, to witness the proceedings too.

 

FrankFrostPhoto 300 copy

At 1:30 p.m. we were ushered into a conference room near Mayor Simpson’s office and introductions, business cards and hand shakes were exchanged between the parties. Mayor Simpson proceeded to chair the discussions and began by explaining the city’s relationship with the RCMP informing Lonnie and Frank and myself that as Mayor his position didn’t include any official mandate to instruct or authority to make any demands upon the RCMP to act upon any of Lonnie’s requests whether he might agree with them or not. Having clarified that point he then asked Lonnie Landrud to share with those present his concerns.

 

Screen Shot 2015-10-06 at 2.42.24 PM

QuesnelMayorBobSimpson

Landrud began by explaining to the Mayor and Staff Sergeant Burton that he has been trying for years now to have the medical records for Cst. Paul Collister made public so that an independent body might be able to examine them. This would, according to Landrud, settle the long standing question as to whether or not the police officer in question had in fact been shot as Lonnie has stated over and over for the past twelve years. He went on to explain the predicament that he’s been in since 1999 where no level of government has been willing to investigate his claims and being unable to obtain any legal representation throughout the whole period of his relentless pursuit to have his charges investigated he’s been forced to act on his own behalf. He also explained how the mainstream media refused to cover his story and how his efforts to cooperate with the authorities always ended up with him either being maligned, threatened, beaten, harassed, ignored, or, as in a number of cases, the RCMP have attempted to murder him themselves.

After citing numerous examples of his efforts to have his allegations looked into and receiving no assistance from any level of government Mayor Simpson then offered his opinion on police commissions relating instances where the RCMP were thoroughly investigated and brought to task for any crimes that they had committed. Staff Sergeant Andrew Burton concurred with Simpson’s position stating that over the past 22 years of service he had been involved in numerous investigations into police wrong-doing and suggested to Mr. Landrud that the RCMP were tougher on crimes committed by their own officers than anyone else.

Mayor Simpson then commented that given all of Lonnie’s past attempts to have some agency take on his case and not having any success that possibly this was occurring because all of those individuals and agencies who Lonnie was contacting may not have felt that his story was credible enough to warrant any serious investigation. Given the past sixteen years of endless attempts to convince those in authority that he did have sufficient evidence and credible witnesses who would testify on his behalf plus fourteen attempts on his life that have left him with severe medical problems which the medical system refuses to address Lonnie Landrud didn’t appear to be that impressed by Mayor Simpson’s proffered explanation for why a person can publicly admit to having witnessed two police officers murdering a person and then four years later shoot one of the officers and still nothing is being done about it after such an inordinate length of time.

Having related to the group present a number of times examples of attempts on his life Mayor Simpson asked Landrud why he didn’t just leave the Quesnel and relocate elsewhere. Lonnie replied that moving wasn’t an option for him, stating, “Who would know that I had gone missing if the RCMP were successful in killing me?”. He went on to state that he had been born in Quesnel and lived here all his life and his family lived here too and there was little point in trying to run away where he would have no safety net whatsoever to fall  back on.

Lonnie then brought up the issue of Deena Braem’s parents and the fact that, after the allegations were brought forth of the RCMP’s involvement in their daughter’s death they were issued with an order to not communicate with Lonnie. Staff Sergeant Andrew Burton responded by stating that he had never heard of such a thing occurring and to his way of thinking if the Braem family didn’t want to communicate with Mr. Landrud and expressed such a wish to the police then it would be Landrud who would be issued with an order prohibiting him from having any contact with Deena’s parents.

Having listened patiently to everything that Lonnie had to say concerning his efforts to seek redress for all that’s gone on since that night in the park and also the fact that Landrud told Staff Sergeant Burton that he had evidence concerning other missing women who had died along the infamous “Highway of Tears” the Sergeant then told Lonnie and everyone else present in the room that although he was new to Quesnel and didn’t know anything about Lonnie or his story that now he had been made aware of the situation he would do everything in his power to look into the matter as he too was also deeply concerned about the missing women. With regard to the suppressed medical records for Cst. Paul Collister, the alleged murder suspect, Burton told Landrud that he would look into trying to locate the records so that they could then be properly inspected.

The realization that both the Mayor of the City of Quesnel and detachment head RCMP Staff Sergeant Burton were open and receptive to listening to what Lonnie Landrud had to say and Staff Sergeant Burton was willing to actually commit, before witnesses, to try and resolve the issue was, in itself, a long overdue sign of recognition and a potential indication that Landrud’s years of being maligned, dismissed, harassed and threatened might be coming to an end. The proof of course is always in the pudding and only time will tell whether or not this latest attempt to achieve some form of closure on the matter will bear any fruit.

What is absolutely certain though is the fact that two public officials, one the Mayor of Quesnel and the other the head of the local RCMP detachment, were finally willing to take the time to sit down and listen to Lonnie Landrud’s plea for an independent inquiry into his allegations of having witnessed a brutal murder right here in Quesnel.

Given the background of the Highway of Tears, the sixty-five women who vanished from the Vancouver’s downtown eastside from 1978 to 2001 and the controversial Pickton case that followed as a result of it, the willingness on the part of Mayor Simpson and Staff Sergeant Burton to grant Lonne Landrud a hearing bodes well for the eventual resolution of delayed justice and may be the first positive step in resolving this long overdue cover-up. As such their efforts were commendable and deserving of appropriate recognition.

—–

Zionist Jew Lobby B’nai Brith Canada Attacks Buddhist Truth Revealer Brian Ruhe by Arthur Topham

BuddhaAttackHdr copy 2

 

BodhisattvaVow

Zionist Jew Lobby B’nai Brith Canada Attacks Buddhist Truth Revealer Brian Ruhe

by

Arthur Topham

They say that the Devil never rests and in the case of Canada’s rabid Zionist Jew lobby organization B’nai Brith Canada truer words were never spoken.

Not wishing to await the outcome of the upcoming trial of R v Roy Arthur Topham set to commence on October 26th, 2015 –  the result of which will play heavily into whether or not the pro-Israeli, Zionist lobbyist will have been successful in using their Sec. 319(2) “Hate Propaganda” legislation, which they successfully embedded into Canadian jurisprudence in order to censor and suppress any and all legitimate criticism of their nefarious political ideology and their detestable terrorist, racist supremacist actions in Palestine and around the world – the Zionists are continually combing the Internet here in Canada trolling with vehement and fanatical Simon Wiesenthal “Nazi-hunting” fervour for more truth seekers who are courageously revealing the plethora of lies that the Zionist controlled msm has been mind-controlling the masses with for the past century.

There are more victims of Zionist misfeasance in former democratic Canada than the recent case of Buddhist author and teacher Brian Ruhe of Vancouver, B.C., the foremost being that of Vancouver’s Chinese artist and writer Joe Canuck whose two websites www.joecanuck.net and www.joecanuck.wix.com/justiceforchinese were both surreptitiously and summarily silenced and removed from the net by the server www.wix.com without explanation to the owner, but for now I will focus on Ruhe as his woes are well documented.

What is rather unique about this latest provocation by the Zionist Jew control freaks from B’nai Brith Canada is that they usually spend their time and taxpayer’s money attacking Christians who they feel they can accuse of spreading “hate” toward their self-chosen tribe of spiritual delinquents in order to have their victim’s tossed in the slammer for a couple of years and their websites either taken down and/or, as in the recent case of Canada’s coffee and donut franchise Tim Hortons, if nothing else, at least have their sites blocked from access by the general public.

These Talmudic Marxist Bolshevik Communist inspired censors from B’nai Brith Canada are relentless and deeply disturbed individuals – their insecurity and paranoia being paramount and the transparency of their actions blatantly obvious in every act they perform. Rather than openly debating those who criticize aspects of their own ideological foundations and proving them wrong they prefer to use their “power of the purse” and their undue political, legal and media influence to simply vilify and slander their intellectual opponents and in the process do anything they can to discriminate against and harass them and destroy their financial means of survival.

In the case of Vancouver based Buddhist teacher Brian Ruhe, rather than attempt to have him charged with a Sec. 319(2) “Hate Propaganda” Criminal Code of Canada offence, they’ve decided to do everything in their power to both discredit his good name amongst his employers and destroy his livelihood at all costs. This is the first instance that I’ve heard of where they are working their vile black sorcery behind the scenes in order to destroy the reputation and good will of a recognized and practising Buddhist. Once again living proof that their Talmudic mindset has absolutely no regard for any other religions or beliefs besides its own supremacist, racist ideology.

Readers who have been following my own case in the courts over the past 9 years of litigation brought on by this same notorious group of self-deluded sycophants for the state of Israel will know that recently I was interviewed on video by Brian Ruhe while in Vancouver early this year while looking after my dying brother. The purpose of the interview was to assist me in raising awareness about Canada’s disgusting, unjust “Hate Crime” legislation (Sec. 318 to 320 CCC) which the Zionist Jew lobby was directly responsible for creating for their own self-serving purposes as well as helping me to raise funds for my upcoming trial this October.

Meeting Brian for the first time in the flesh it was easily discernible to me that here was another individual who had finally, through his own researching and seeking, come to the full realization that all we had been told and taught about world history over the past century was twisted and warped beyond comprehension by the Zionist Jew media acting in and through all of its shape-shifting aspects, be they academia, Hollywood movies, books, magazines, radio stations, tv news and the Zionist newspaper monopoly.

Brian Ruhe is the author of two well-known and loved books on Buddhism. His first work, Freeing the Buddha, pictured below was published in March of 1998.

FreeingtheBuddha copy

FreeingtheBuddha 1 copy

Brian’s second work, A Short Walk On An Ancient Path, came out in 2010 accompanied, as in his first work, with many positive reviews.

ShortWalkonÅncientPath copy

ShortWalkonÅncientPath 1 copy 6ShortWalkonÅncientPath 1 copy 4

ShortWalkonÅncientPath 1 copy 5

Upon reading the book reviews and accolades it was quite apparent that Brian Ruhe was/is a well loved and respected Buddhist meditation instructor. He had moved to Vancouver back in 1980 from Ontario where he’d studied business and philosophy at Brock University. Following a few years stint as a financial planner Brian’s inner quest for greater spiritual understanding finally moved him to begin his search for a deeper understanding of life. Like many of his generation he was drawn to Buddhism because of its focus upon the mind and the age-old practise of seeking within one’s own being for the truths that the soul eternally strives to attain.

Brian’s path led him to a Tibetan Buddhist centre in Vermont, USA that had been founded by the world reknowned Buddhist teacher Chögyam Trungpa. From there he traveled to Thailand where he continued his spiritual efforts for the next four years and was trained to be a meditation instructor. Brian eventually returned to Canada in order to begin sharing his teachings with others.

It wasn’t coincidental nor did it require any amount of foresight to realize that while in conversation with Brian at his Kitsilano apartment in Vancouver during the course of our interview we openly discussed the prospect that it was merely a matter of time before he would, in all likelihood, like myself, soon show up on B’nai Brith Canada’s radar screen and the attack upon his name and work would commence. In fact, it wasn’t long after doing the video with Brian I learned from him that he was being attacked front, left and center by the Zionist forces embedded throughout our pro-Israel, Jewish-influenced cultural institutions.

Of course, as per usual, it began with a Zionist Jew “Lama” (try wrapping your mind around that one!) by the name of “Tsewang” who phoned Brian at his home and threatened to call B’nai Brith Canada (BBC) and report him. Once he did that B’nai Brith’s Victoria based sayan operative* wrote to the Vancouver Parks Board and had Brian fired from teaching at (four) community centres.

On Sept. 14th Mr. Ruhe did get fired from the Roundhouse Community and Arts Centre. When this despicable act occurred Brian Ruhe phoned the sayan agent in Victoria, B.C. and spoke to him.  The BBC operative told Brian “I don’t think you’re qualified to teach.” He then threatened to contact the Vancouver Police force and register a complaint of harassment against Mr. Ruhe for actually having the chutzpah to call him on the telephone to discuss his rash and hateful behaviour!

Following word of his dismissal Brian also wrote a letter to Craig Giles – President of the Roundhouse Community and Arts Centre stating in part,

“As the president of the association you are in a leadership position in our community and it doesn’t make sense that someone in Victoria should tell you how to do your job. Were you under pressure from any quarters to fire me? Did City Manager Penny Ballem have anything to do with this?

I have taught meditation for 16 years at the Roundhouse since 1999 with over 1000 people taking my classes there in groups from 5 to 25. This has helped a lot of people and I have a good reputation with these students. I’ve always enjoyed working with the staff and have had a very good relationship with them all these years. I have booked Tuesday nights here and now it’s too late to work somewhere else for the fall term.

This is a larger issue of freedom of speech in Canada. I was fired for using my freedom of speech in my YouTube videos where I discuss truth search themes about geopolitical power in the world and 20th century history. I didn’t discuss these views in my meditation classes, I was not accused of doing so and there were no complaints from the students in my classes. I feel that I am showing a high moral standard by speaking out for the benefit of humanity. Our country was founded on the fundamental principle of freedom of speech and our forefathers fought for the freedoms that you and I have today. You are in a leadership position so I ask you to consider this and write back to me with your thoughts on this please.

Thank you kindly,

Brian Ruhe

brianruhe.ca

So that in a nutshell is what is now happening here in Canada when anyone decides to question the Zionist Jewish narrative whether it be their “Holocaust Hoax” of the 20th Century, their actions in Gaza against the indigenous true Semitic people of Palestine, their media control over Canada and the West,  or any number of other facets of the Zionist paradigm that the Jews subject their host societies to in order to maintain their power base throughout the Western world.

Brian Ruhe’s experience is not new. Je Suis Brian Ruhe! There have been dozens of other Canadians before him (including yours truly) who have suffered the slings and arrows of outrageous falsehood by the political machinations of this tribe of psychopathic deviants willing to go to any length to prevent the world from knowing the truth about their dark and sinister agenda for total global control of the world’s resources, both natural and human.

In a very real sense this is the essence of all that I have fought against over the past nine years of ongoing litigation brought on by this power-crazed Rothschild Freemasonic organization known as B’nai Brith Canada. It began on Valentine’s Day February 14th, 2007 when this same deluded maniacal sayan first sent me an unsolicited email using a phoney alias “Brian Esker” accusing me of being an “anti-Semite” and demanding that I stop publishing articles on the Zionist Jews and remove the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion from my website.

Come October 26th, 2015 here in Quesnel’s Supreme Court we will see whether or not these past nine years of harassment, intimidation, arrest, incarceration and theft of my personal computers, files and firearms will end with a victory for freedom of speech in Canada and a loss for the likes of this traitorous foreign lobby group B’nai Brith Canada and their sleazy serpentine zombie trolls. If it doesn’t then we will all be held hostage to these alien enemy interlopers who’ve been destroying our nation and culture for the past century and the country will be torn further and further apart as they once again destroy another gentile nation in their heinous game of power and control over humanity.

Justice must and Will prevail.

——-

* [Editors Note: I am restricted by a court order from publishing the name of this B’nai Brith agent.]

••••  ••••

Please help out with my upcoming Sec. 319(2) “Hate Propaganda” trial in October by making a donation.

Donations can be made online via my GoGetFunding site located at http://gogetfunding.com/canadian-publisher-faces-jail-for-political-writings/ or else by sending cash, cheques or Money Orders to the following postal address. Please make sure that any cheques or Money Orders are made out to – Arthur Topham – and sent to:

Arthur Topham
4633 Barkerville Highway
Quesnel, B.C.
V2J 6T8

Pianist Valentina Lisitsa: latest victim of Canada’s pro-Zionist Sec. 319(2) Hate Propaganda laws By Arthur Topham

VLHeader

Pianist Valentina Lisitsa:

latest victim of Canada’s pro-Zionist Sec. 319(2) Hate Propaganda laws  

By

Arthur Topham

“We don’t have freedom of speech to protect only those we agree with, or those whose views are inoffensive. We have it precisely to protect people who have unpopular or even outrageous opinions.”

Editorial, Toronto Star, April 7, 2015

“It’s really hard to come up with words to praise her highly enough because this is someone the world needs to hear.”

Michael Fine, Producer, Valentina Lisitsa’s Rachmaninoff Project at London’s Abbey Road Studio with the London Philharmonic Orchestra

Preliminary remarks

Back on April 27th, 2011, just days prior to Canada’s May 2nd federal election that saw the Stephen Harper Conservative government ascend to power, I penned and published an article titled, Hating Harper. The purpose of the piece was two-fold; first, to highlight my own battle with the then despicable Sec. 13(1) “hate crime” legislation that the Canadian Human Rights Commission and B’nai Brith Canada had been using against me since 2007 and second, to warn the Canadian electorate of the potentially dire consequences for the nation should the Conservative win a majority government.

The essay outlined what I felt were the root reasons why Canadians shouldn’t vote for this particular party. In part it contained the following:

Plainly stated Canada is a Zionist Jew-controlled colony of the state of Israel. . . While hidden for over six decades from the majority of Canadians by the Zionist-controlled media’s ‘Iron Curtain’ of deception it is nonetheless an established fact and a reality that must be faced if the nation is to ever recover its former independence and sovereignty.

Anyone who desires to dispute this assertion has to explain and justify to the people of Canada why there is not a single federal political party in the country willing to stand up to the Zionist Jew lobby that now wields such a sinister political influence upon the nation. To attempt a negation of the argument without speaking to this issue can only be construed as evasion and denial.

In the thick of yet another federal election, with Harper and his Conservative party striving with utmost intent to gain a majority government, this pseudo-Semitic elephant in the midst of Canada’s political/judicial/cultural/social living room blithely goes about its business of knocking over, crushing and destroying the country’s constitutional rights along with trammeling upon its domestic and foreign policies, all the while aided and abetted in its traitorous actions by a colluding, fifth column ‘mainstream’ media; itself but another monopoly controlled weapon within the Zionist’s plethoric armory of subterfuge and deception. . .

Screen Shot 2015-04-09 at 11.17.33 AM

. . .The Conservative government of Stephen Harper is a contemptible Trojan Horse. Like previous governments it was dragged into Ottawa under the pretense of being the best option for Canadians to preserve not only their integrity as a free and democratic nation but to set a good example for the rest of the world; one that other nations might look up to and aspire after in the hope that someday they would also reap the benefits that a free society and sovereign democracy can offer to its people. This has not been the case. As we can see from the graphic immediately above there is a specific, self-chosen group of zealots who, through subterfuge and the power of their usurious ‘purse’ plus their Babylonian Talmud-inspired ideology known as Zionism, have a totally different agenda in store for the nation.

Voters, who for the most part have been deceived by the pundits and the Zionist-controlled talking heads within their media, remain unaware of this insidious threat to our sovereignty. Were Canadians fully apprised of the seditious nature of the Zionist Jews within their nation’s walls they would likely vote en masse to rid the country of this omnipresent danger. But they aren’t and so the country once again teeters on the brink of the unknowing. Should the false saviour of Canada, Stephen Harper, achieve his mandate to rule over us with his Zionist rod then maybe that will be the time for a new movement to arise and a new federal party to germinate; one that will address the issues I’ve delineated in this essay plus all the others not covered. The key to our future as a sovereign nation is to understand how the Zionist agenda operates, not only in Canada but throughout the world. Without that key we will continue to remain prisoners of Zion.”

On April 28, 2011, the day after my article appeared on the net Canada’s #1 serial “hate crime” complainant working for the Canadian Jewish lobby organization B’nai Brith Canada (a court order prohibits me from mentioning his name), filed a Sec. 319(2) CCC complaint against myself and my website RadicalPress.com alleging that I was “promoting hatred toward Jews”.

On May 30, 2011, less than a month after the Harper Conservative government won the election, a second Sec. 319(2) CCC “hate propaganda” complaint was filed against me and my website by a representative of B’nai Brith Canada (a court order prohibits me from mentioning his name as well) also accusing me of “promoting hatred toward Jews”.

Both of these complaints were received by the BC Hate Crime Team in Surrey, B.C. and an investigation was undertaken by Det. Cst. Terry Wilson. A year later on May 16th, 2012 I was arrested by the BC Hate Crime Team while traveling to work and placed in a jail cell while the RCMP illegally entered my premises using a trumped up “search warrant” and stole all of my computers and electronic files containing well over a hundred thousand private emails.

I have been fighting this second, specious criminal charge that could result in a two year jail sentence ever since. The case is now in BC Supreme Court with a trial date set for October 26th, 2015.

With the one exception of my home town community newspaper the Quesnel Cariboo Observer and its illustrious editor Autumn Macdonald, ever since 2012 my story has been virtually blacked out by Canada’s mainstream media. Nothing, other than the usual smear and slander that appeared back in the msm in November of 2012 when the Indictment was formally handed down by the BC Attorney General’s office, has come out in the press since relating to the mis-use of these so-called  “Hate Propaganda” laws.

The Discordant Case of Valentina Lisitsa

lisitsa

The recent case of world renowned pianist Valentina Lisitsa has once again highlighted the hypocrisy, bigotry and outright malfeasance that pervades Canada’s judiciary and the nation’s cultural and social media environment when it comes to using the “hate” card, aka Sections 318 – 320 of Canada’s Criminal Code, to harass, intimidate and slander anyone whose opinions and political viewpoints don’t fall in line with the expected (and calculated) agenda of the Zionist interlopers who now control the Prime Minister’s office, his cabinet and, thus far, the leaders of all the other federal parties.

In an article published April 7th, 2015 in the Globe & Mail, reporter Robert Everett-Green writes: “On March 13, Ms. Lisitsa said, the TSO [Toronto Symphany Orchestra] forwarded to Ms. Dorn an e-mail from Toronto lawyer Michael C. Smith that cited section 319 of the Criminal Code concerning “wilful promotion of hatred,” and said “there is a possibility that Ms. Lisitsa could be stopped at the border … and deemed ‘unacceptable’ to Canada.” An attached note from Mr. Melanson, who is not a lawyer, went further, stating that Ms Lisitsa’s social media posts “would likely breach or come close to breaching the Criminal Code of Canada.” Ms. Lisitsa replied with her lawyer’s opinion rejecting that of Mr. Smith. [All emphasis added.]

So what exactly does Canada’s Criminal Code say about “hate” – this oft used and ever abused term that the Zionist lobbyist has managed to inject, via subterfuge, into the country’s legal system and their media tool kit? The Code reads:

Wilful promotion of hatred

319. (2) Every one who, by communicating statements, other than in private conversation, wilfully promotes hatred against any identifiable group is guilty of

(a) an indictable offence and is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years; or

(b) an offence punishable on summary conviction.

Judging from the wording of the text we find that just like the term “terrorist” there’s no actual definition given as to what the word “hatred” means. In other words it is subjective and means whatever a person or lawyer or judge decides it means to them. This fact renders it useless in terms of trying to argue against it or debate it once the word has been inserted into jurisprudence thus making it merely a tool for intimidation and control in the same way that the term “anti-Semite” has been used for the last century to browbeat and demonize anyone who so much as issues a dissenting sigh in hearing distance of a Zionist Jew or one of their sycophantic lackeys.

The same has now become true for the “6 million” holocaust debate wherein an accusation of being a “holocaust denier” has taken on the same legal authority in certain countries and is being used to censor proven historical facts and jail anyone who so much as questions whether the alleged event ever occurred in real time or disputes the purported numbers.

As an editorial in the Toronto Star on April 7 put it the Ukrainian-born pianist shouldn’t have been prevented from performing with the Toronto Symphony Orchestra, adding that, “In a particularly weak explanation of why the orchestra was dropping her, TSO president Jeff Melanson said Lisitsa was bounced over “ongoing accusations of deeply offensive language by Ukrainian media outlets.” And, he added: “As one of Canada’s most important cultural institutions, our priority must remain on being a stage for the world’s great works of music, and not for opinions that some believe to be deeply offensive.”

This misses the point on at least two counts. First, Lisitsa was not invited to Toronto to discuss her provocative political views. She was scheduled to play the piano. And second, banning a musician for expressing “opinions that some believe to be offensive” shows an utter failure to grasp the concept of free speech.

We don’t have freedom of speech to protect only those we agree with, or those whose views are inoffensive. We have it precisely to protect people who have unpopular or even outrageous opinions.

Again, in a subsequent article on April 9 in the same publication writer  Vinay Menon adds, “It’s a good thing Jeff Melanson isn’t running our public library system. Or the city would need to hire 2,000 firefighters to keep up with all the book burnings this summer. . . Am I being unfair to Melanson, chief executive of the Toronto Symphony Orchestra? Perhaps! But this is my opinion and, here in Canada, we are allowed to express opinions, even ones that may seem unfair and offensive.”

Menon further states, “The spiritual charter of any cultural institution, important or otherwise, must have certain words etched between the operational lines, including ‘freedom of expression‘ and ‘don’t cave to special interests.‘”

Valentina Quote graphic800

It’s a well established fact that those who accuse others of “promoting hatred” are, themselves, the ones who hate to hear the truth and therefore resort to Canada’s infamous “Hate Propaganda” laws in order to stifle any discussion related to their own questionable actions. Such has been my own experience in dealing with my accusers and, as we can see from Valentina’s encounter with the bureaucrats who run the Toronto Symphony Orchestra she ran into this this same mindset; one that invariably displays both a lack of integrity and the inability to talk openly and honestly about their intentions or their ultimate agenda.

Are we finally seeing a change in attitude on the part of Canada’s mainstream media when it comes to actually challenging Canada’s ill-conceived “Hate Propaganda” laws contained in Section 318 – 320 of the Criminal Code?

Is Canada’s media, the same organ that trumpeted the call for the repeal of Sec. 13(1) now going to tackle the final citadel of censorship, Section 319 of the Criminal Code? If so then they’ll also have to start considering lending a positive voice to organizations like the Ontario Civil Liberties Association, the one and only civil liberties group in Canada to date that is openly supporting my legal case and the repeal of these Orwellian “Hate” laws that reap nothing but repression, opprobrium and the loss of free expression for all Canadians and others like pianist Valentina Lisitsa.

The time is long past for Canada to resume its former role as a free and democratic nation and nothing will ensure that this happens more than the country ridding itself of all its Zionist-induced “Hate” legislation.

—–

 

QuesnelCaribooObserver: Topham grateful for legal ally by Autumn MacDonald, Observer Reporter

 CaribObserverTophamGrateful

Topham grateful for legal ally

By

Autumn MacDonald

Observer Reporter

 

He says if controversial speech is prohibited then no speech is safe.

Jeremy Maddock is studying law at UVIC and is currently helping Arthur Topham, charged with “promotion of hatred” navigate the judicial system.

And after the death of his lawyer Doug Christie in March of 2013, Topham said he’s even more grateful.

“He’s been so dedicated since Doug passed away,” Topham said.

“I’m so grateful, otherwise I’m sure I’d be hooped.”

Maddock, who was working under Christie for three years, said Topham’s case and the issue of freedom of expression are his motivating factors for offering his time and expertise.

“If you’re having a political discussion – I would hope you would have the right to agree or disagree with foreign government,” he said.

Topham was arrested and his house searched in May 16 of 2012 after it was determined there were “reasonable grounds the offence of promotion of hatred was committed.”

At the time a number of items were seized, including:

• Computer, laptop, smartphone, or device that accesses the Internet and is capable of uploading and downloading information, and all their peripheral equipment, computer discs, drives or storage devices which could be used to store information; and

• Billing records, receipts and correspondence with ABC Communications and Netfirms and correspondence in the form of mail or physical documents directed to Radical Press.

The alleged offence falls under section 319(2) of the Criminal Code: willful promotion of hatred. The search warrant and arrest were executed by the New Westminster Police Services, British Columbia Hate Crime Team.

At the time Topham was prohibited from accessing the Internet and operating his websites, including the Radical Press, but those restrictions were reinstated in early November of 2012.

Anyone wishing to contribute to Topham’s “freedom of expression fund” check out, http://gogetfunding.com/project/canadian-publisher-faces-jail-for-political-writings

——

An Open Letter to all Truth Deniers & Holocaust Believers By Arthur Topham

OpenLet2TruthDeniers&HolocaustBelievers

An Open Letter to all Truth Deniers and Holocaust Believers

By

Arthur Topham

August 22nd, 2014

 

RPEditor400

[Editor’s Preface:

What sparked this open letter to those who still believe in what historical revisionist and author Arthur R. Butz called “The Hoax of the Twentieth Century: The Case Against the Presumed Extermination of European Jewry” (the title of his 1976 book that demolished forever the mythological basis for what, in my estimation, was, and remains, the most colossal and earth-threatening lie ever to have been told to mankind) was a comment from a person (Nick Inglis) on a post that I had submitted to a local Quesnel, B.C. Facebook group of which I was a member at the time. It was the standard “guilty by association” ploy that both Jews and their deluded gentile lackeys in the west perpetually use whenever they don’t have anything intelligent to offer to a debate. In this case the fellow who posted it appeared to be a member of the science faculty at a B.C. university in the southern region of the province. Given that the author of comment represented what might be called a member of Canada’s intelligentsia I felt it was time to inform those of his mindset of a few things that they were unwittingly overlooking in their efforts to sustain this massive falsification that has plagued the world since 1945.]

_______

Dear Nick Inglis, Truth Deniers & Holocaust Believers:

While out getting firewood yesterday I got to thinking about your August 16th comment on the WTF Quesnel FB group where you had remarked on a post of mine, “I wonder what Councillor Thapar would think about being used as a reference to support a Holocaust denier.”

Apart from the fact that your words were obviously meant to imply “guilt by association” between myself and Quesnel City Councillor Sushil Thapar, thus reflecting badly on the councillor, that aspect of your comment wasn’t what I was meditating on while falling the beetle-killed pines along the Cariboo roadside.

It appears (from clicking on your FB profile) that you have begun a new job with the Biology Faculty at Kwantlen Polytechnic University in Surrey, B.C.  It was this point that caught my attention and got me thinking further about your remark concerning the fact that I don’t believe in the 6 Million myth and therefore am a prime candidate for labelling as a “Holocaust denier” by the Zionist Jews and those like yourself who support their psychopathy.

As someone who appears to be involved in science it begs the question as to why you would be so quick to make such an accusation against me and also why you would be buying into the “Holocaust” fiction in the first place given that your profession rests, for the most part, upon reason, logic and provable facts rather than assertions, accusations, emotions and beliefs (as odd, inconceivable and incomprehensible as they may be).

As a scientist I’m certain you must be aware of the situation that the 16th Century Italian physicist, mathematician, astronomer and philosopher Galileo found himself in when he discovered (thanks to his newly designed telescope) that his predecessor Nicolaus Copernicus’ theory that the Earth and all of the planets actually revolved around the Sun rather than the opposite world view  – one that postulated the Earth was the center of our Universe – was, in fact, true.

You must also be aware of the persecution, ignominy and lifetime incarceration that Galileo underwent thanks to the machinations of the Roman Catholic Church when he refused to recant his position, all of which relates to this 20th century phenomenon that the Jews have, with wilful and intentional malice, forced upon the world via their monopolistic control of all major media sources coupled with their inordinate financial and political influence over western nations and politicians (as has now become so patently obvious during the latest round of genocide in Gaza wherein no western “leader” has shown the courage or fortitude to question and demand a stop to the needless slaughter of thousands of innocent men, women and especially children).

It was the Renaissance Nick that first gave birth to what we now call the Scientific Method – a time, after centuries of darkness and ignorance, when man’s inquisitive and skeptical mind and spirit of inquiry finally burst forth in open opposition to the then accepted Authority of the day. Without this method of approaching any hypothetical question and proving it with verifiable facts the world would still be held in throng to superstition and religious speculation rather than actual truth. Given this new reality that the world adopted over four hundred years ago I fail to understand how you, as a scientist, can equate (and justify) making ILLEGAL the questioning of anything; be it a scientific theory, an accepted fact of nature or, even the fiction of “6 Million Jews” having been gassed to death and then cremated in ovens in German occupied territory during WW2?

Cannot you see that, in this particular case, i.e., the 6 Million myth, you are being confronted with the ONLY exception to the scientific methodology upon which your profession and all scientific professions rest? Why is it that, in this one instance, you are somehow able to suspend your understanding of the scientific method of discovery and suddenly accept, on hearsay and proven contrived “evidence”, that governments, under the influence of one small religious cult, can actually legislate laws that make it an indictable offence to question this fiction or anything else for that matter? Where does freedom of thought and inquiry play into this diabolical farce? Where does common sense and the basics of scientific research come in? Where, in truth, does anything logical or reasonable come into play when anyone, be they a government or a religious group (as in the case of the Jews) or an individual, is able to make it illegal to question any matter of history or any event or anything that may be theorized, ranging from the scientific up through the branches of philosophy and art to even the spiritual pinnacle of theological speculation?

One would think (reasonably and logically) that if any statement, of all the myriad questions that mankind has considered throughout history, ought to meet such a criterion and be prohibited by law it would be the denial of God rather than a purported historic event that has countless loopholes in it which would prevent it from becoming accepted by the whole world (scientific or otherwise) as an unquestionable fact. In other words are we to remain free to question the existence of the Creator Himself yet unable to question, based upon scientific evidence or otherwise, the fraudulent claims of the Zionist Jews who, through cunning and conspiracy, plus the heavily weighted influence of their purse and their control of all aspects of our major sources of communication, have not only successfully foisted this lie upon mankind and then exacerbated it by programming successive generations of people to accept it as the gospel truth but have now managed to actually elevate it to the apex of juridical absurdity through the manufacture of actual legislation in certain countries that make it ILLEGAL to question what is undoubtedly, as researcher Arthur R. Butz clearly proved back in 1976, the greatest hoax of the 20th century?

Of course I know why you made that comment just as I know why the Zionist Jews and the state of Israel have been slaughtering Palestinians and stealing their land for over a century. It is, as the Jews so often have stated in the past with respect to their 6 Million myth, “manifestly obvious” that your intent is to discourage others from any association with those who, like myself, refuse to accept the unacceptable and fraudulent premise of the 6 Million and thus segregate and isolate our thoughts and ideas and opinions and years of intensive research so that no one will be tempted to investigate further what I or numerous others have to say about any of the related problems that political Zionism has created throughout the 20th century and which now, are coming to a head, in the early beginnings of the 21st.

Here is your modus operandi and the scenario that you would have others believe:

The primary purpose of labelling a person an “anti-Semite” or a “Holocaust denier” or a “hate monger” or any number of other similar epithets is, pure and simple, outright vilification. In other words if you can first create labels like those just identified and then instil their circumscribed and false meanings in the minds of the general public through mass programming (via the mainstream media which the Jews control), then once this is established it precludes having to establish any further solid proof to support whatever allegations you may wish to make about a person, group, organization or even government for that matter, which you intend to destroy by first defaming them in order to discredit either their character and integrity or their work (i.e. opposing views).

To return to your original remark let us see how this program of vilification would work should it actually be followed through.

I have lived in Cariboo region of British Columbia, Canada since 1970 which amounts to forty-four years (with some brief absences). From 1975 on I have lived here steadily working and raising a family and contributing to the local community in a number of ways. 

The Quesnel area has a overall population of about 30,000 people which is not a large number to get to know  or become known to over the span of nearly half a century. Because of my propensity for writing and my interest in politics and history I have been a regular contributor to Quesnel’s community newspaper, the Quesnel Cariboo Observer where, according to statistics, I earned a reputation for having contributed more “Letters to the Editor” to that publication than anyone else in its 106 year history of publishing.  As well I have been a paid columnist for the same publication.

My civil commitments to the local region have also been  substantial and fulfilling with years of community service in my own local community of Cottonwood which lies approximately 20 miles east of the city of Quesnel. I’ve worked in a number of different professions ranging from school teaching to that of a Park Ranger and Supervisor to being a log builder, the owner of a registered carpentry business  as well as owning and running a registered publishing business known as The Radical Press along with placer mining and being the Secretary of the Cariboo Mining Association.

On top of these activities I’ve been actively participating in local politics at the regional, municipal and provincial levels of government having at different times ran for the position of Councillor for the city of Quesnel as well as for the provincial MLA’s position for the Cariboo North electoral district.

In other words I haven’t been sitting idle over the past forty years plus. It is this legacy of community contributions and effort that you are attempting to destroy by your calculated and malicious attempt to discredit my life’s work using worn-out tactics of slander and libel and defamation, all of which are meant to malign my character and denigrate all of my efforts over the past four decades. 

But that’s not the worst of it. You would have your mean-spirited accusations and spiteful assertions carry over to all those with whom I’ve established relations with throughout my lifetime here in the Cariboo. In other words all of my friends and associates and those within my community who I’ve had social or business dealings with for decades are all to suddenly void their association with me because now I am a “Holocaust denier” and no longer the person I’ve been all my life. Are you not capable of intellectually grasping the enormity of what you are attempting to do via your spurious, and, yes, hateful slander?

You mentioned Councillor Sushil Thapar in your comment but you have failed to mention the rest of the many councillors and mayors of the city of Quesnel who I have known and associated with and befriended over the past forty-four years. Are they also expected to treat me as if I were suddenly a pariah and a leper because someone of your mental measure has  inferred that I am a “Holocaust denier”?

Why it wasn’t that long ago that I was speaking with one of the former mayors of Quesnel and he remarked to me, upon hearing that I had been charged with a “hate crime”, “Why Arthur how can this be? I’ve always known you to be a “peace and love” sorta guy, one of the old Hippies who’s always strived to bring  social justice and brotherhood and sisterhood and environmental sanity back to the world.” Were he and all the other public figures who I know to take your ill-intentioned and evil advice they would all, needs be, have to see me in a totally different light and accept that they had been wrong about me all their lives and that in reality I’m just a no-good, worthless, hate-mongering, Jew-hating anti-Semite and, horror of horrors, a “Holocaust denier”!

And that, Nick Inglis, is the long and the short of your intentions and your sleazy tactics. Rather than have to defend your libellous accusations made against my person by offering up substantial evidence to prove what you are alleging is verifiable truth it’s much easier to merely resort to the Zionist Jew’s deceptive deck of shitty smear cards in the vain hope that whatever ones you pull out will somehow stick to me and save you having to actually offer credible sources to support your surreptitiously motivated intentions.

Like I mentioned earlier in this article the definitive proof that the so-called 6 Million Jewish Holocaust is nothing more than a fabricated fraud is all contained in Arthur R. Butz’s book, The Hoax of the Twentieth Century. Once again I humbly suggest to you and all the rest of the truth-deniers and holocaust believers in the world that you obtain a copy of this book and read it carefully. Having done that and you are still convinced that you can disprove what Mr. Butz has shown to be the truth regarding this deception then please share your findings with the rest of the truth seekers of the world who have already determined the veracity of this indisputable document.

In Peace and Justice for All,

I remain,

Arthur Topham

___________

 

 

 

Topham denied Rowbotham application – Quesnel Cariboo Observer

ObservFPageRowboth copy

Quesnel Cariboo Observer keeps community up to date on Radical Press Sec. 319(2) Criminal Charge

Screen Shot 2013-09-01 at 11.21.32 AM

RadPress Editor

[Editor’s Note: The Radical Press would like to thank the Quesnel Cariboo Observer for their ongoing coverage of my legal challenges with respect to the spurious sec. 319(2) charge of willfully promoting hatred against “people of the Jewish religion or ethnic group.” Generally cases such as these never receive any mention in the Zionist controlled media unless it’s to add more vilification and slander to the accused and so I am always appreciative when the community that I’ve lived in for the past 43 years recognizes the fact that it is deserving of public acknowledgment.

I might also point out that this is just one more good reason to have public media that isn’t all in the hands of one small minority whose agenda is continuously only pro-Israel and pro-censorship of free speech when it comes to critical discussion of Israel’s ideology and their treatment of the Palestinian people.

I would encourage readers to respond favourably to any updates that are run in the Observer and show support and appreciation for their efforts with regard to freedom of speech and an open media. Feel free to write to the editor of the Quesnel Cariboo Observer at the following address:

Editor editor@caribooobserver.com

Thanks]

Letter to Editor of QuesnelCaribooObserver:The time for hidden truths is over by Arthur Topham

ObserverLogo1

Screen Shot 2013-07-31 at 6.24.43 PM

Screen Shot 2013-07-31 at 6.23.27 PM

QuesCariSent Editor:Pub

[Editor’s Note: I want to thank the Editor of the Quesnel Cariboo Observer, Autumn Macdonald for having the courage and steadfast dedication to freedom of speech to print my recent letter. I know of no other msm publication that has given me the time of day when it comes to writing about any issue related to my current legal battles involving B’nai Brith Canada and their mouthpiece in Victoria, Mr. Agent Z. My hometown newspaper has done its utmost to support me ever since Agent Z and his “League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada” first laid their sec. 13 “hate crime” complaint against me via the Canadian Human Rights Commission on August 28, 2007. This, I believe, is a result of knowing me as  a person, a member of the local community, a contributor to their newspaper and a columnist for their paper over the last forty odd years. It’s one of the bonuses of having lived continuously in a relatively small community setting for many years. For anyone interested in the letter I am also posting an html version of it below for use.]

Editor,

Re: Freemasons are men of discretion, worthy of confidences, CaribooObserver, July 24, 2013, A9

As a regular subscriber to your newspaper I’ve been following the series of recent articles regarding the Quesnel Masonic Lodge #69’s 100th Anniversary with some interest.

Having spent many years studying world religions, occult (secret) societies, assorted philosophies and various spiritual paths, I found the history of freemasonry to be one of the more compelling and interesting of the mystery schools.

The fact that freemasonry deliberately shrouds itself in secrecy, I believe, naturally makes it stand out, opening it up to all sorts of speculation as to its motivations and its practises.

In his article Bill Cave states, “Why are the rituals and ceremonies secret? Tradition, more than anything — there have been times and places where promoting equality, freedom of thought or liberty of conscience was dangerous.”

In light of my own personal experience over the past seven years – one involving a series of longstanding legal disputes over the issue of “freedom of thought” it gives me pause to question Mr. Cave’s assertion that the “secrets” which the masonic order deem worthy of concealment may, in fact, truly be dangerous to the rest of the uninitiated inhabitants of this now beleaguered, war-torn and terrified world.

As well, Mr. Cave’s statement “It is also possible to view masonic secrecy not as secrecy in and of itself, but rather as a symbol of privacy and discretion. By not revealing masonic secrets, or acknowledging the many published exposures, freemasons demonstrate that they are men of discretion, worthy of confidences and they place a high value on their word and bond” begs the question as to why withholding of secrets ought to be construed as stemming from “discretion” and denoting they ought to be “worthy of confidences” and their “word” revered and respected.

Could it be more out of “deception” rather than discretion that they don’t want the public to know what goes on behind closed doors?

Having perused the website of the Grand Lodge of British Columbia and Yukon I immediately noted on their home page link “Anti-masonry” the very same defensive arguments being presented as those promulgated by the masonic order known as B’nai Brith International, the very same group who instigated legal action against myself and my website back in 2007 and again in 2012.

As a Christian and a believer in revealed (rather than hidden) truth I tend to view all secrecy, be it of governments, bankers, media and/or secret societies such as the freemasons, as not only obsolete but also potentially dangerous to the welfare of the people as a whole.

The recent revelations of the US’s National Security Agency (NSA) and its secret spying activities by whistleblower Edward Snowden is one of the more poignant examples of what I’m talking about.

The time for hidden truths (if in fact that is what they are) is over. All things hidden must be revealed if we are to regain the most cherished treasures this earth has to offer, those being, world peace, harmony, environmental health, justice, freedom from want, truth and a brotherhood and sisterhood of open and fraternal communities willing to live in unity with each other and God’s creation.

Arthur Topham
Cottonwood, B.C.

Topham applies for Rowbotham by Quesnel Cariboo Observer

QuesCariSent Editor:Pub

Dear Free Speech Supporters,

The June 7, 2013 weekend edition of the Quesnel Cariboo Observer featured another update on my legal battle with B’ai Brith Canada and the Queen of England.

I’m always thankful for whatever unbiased msm coverage that I do get as generally, beyond Black Press (not Conrad) which is an independent chain located here in B.C., the vast majority of the media is owned or controlled by the Jews and inevitably all that I receive from that viperous venue is more pro-Zionist, hate-filled venom.

I’ve posted the Front Page cover and a screen shot of the actual article for easier reading. Because of the nature of many online publications one cannot just go to the article in question and read and/or copy it to a text format. In the case of the QC Observer one must first buy a yearly subscription to the paper before being able to access the online digital edition. Seems pretty weird to me but that’s how they set it up.

 photo CaribooObsRowbotham_zps2223ba7f.png

RowbothamArticle photo ScreenShot2013-06-09at95814AM_zps08a1ae0a.png

Quesnel Cariboo Observer publishes pro Idle No More letter

[Editor’s Note: the following letter was sent to the Quesnel Cariboo Observer  on Feb. 2, 2013 and appeared in full in the Wed. Feb. 6th edition on P. A9 “Feedback”.]

_____________________

Letters to Editor
Autumn Macdonald <editor@quesnelobserver.com>
Quesnel Cariboo Observer
188 Carson Ave,
Quesnel, B.C.
V2J 2A8

February 2, 2013

Arthur Topham
Editor <radical@radicalpress.com>
4633 Barkerville Highway
Quesnel, B.C.
V2J 6T8

Dear Editor,

Re: Ignore, Idle No More, Observer, Jan. 30, 2013

Wright is wrong on all the claimed assumptions and prejudices contained in his criticism of the Idle No More movement.

His advice to MP Dick Harris to ignore the issues brought forth by the movement is short sighted and based upon ignorance of both the Harper government’s intent regarding their recent Omnibus bill (designed to destroy Canadian sovereignty over our resources) and the history of land claims in the province of B.C.

Wright is also dead wrong in attempting to portray the INM movement as a strictly partisan effort on the part of Canada’s grassroots First Nations as his assessment clearly overlooks too many historic facts surrounding the reasons why Idle No More has finally and suddenly burst forth and has been taken up by nations around the world.

In many ways INM has become a touchstone and symbol of the ongoing repression and exploitation of indigenous peoples everywhere whose lands and rights have been ignored, abused, exploited and illegally extinquished without any due process of law, all the while being tacitly approved of and covered up by a vested corporate media complicit throughout the whole unjust process.

For thousands of years the First Nations people of B.C. subsisted in a land of plenty. Matthew Baillie Begbie, the first Chief Justice of the United Colony of British Columbia and the Province alluding to this matter once stated, “All Indians in B.C. are entirely self-supported and self-supporting.”

When the European settlers arrived here the First Nations economy was boundless and booming. There were no government “hand outs”; nonspecified federal budget percentages allotted to First Nations, no government created “band councils” and definitely no “620 something reserves in this land” as Wright rightly remarks.

Truth be known there was only one reserve when James Douglas established a settlement at Fort Victoria for the Hudson’s Bay Company in 1843 and that reserve was a territory vaster than the combined land mass of California, Oregon and Washington and known today as British Columbia.

The First Nations, being the actual civilized people of the day, and also believing that there was more than enough land and resources for everyone to share in, were respectful and generous enough to welcome the white settlers to establish their settlements within their inherent territory. Today of course, looking back, we can see the results of their misplaced faith and good will in the colonialists of their day.

Rather than touting the corporate agenda of the “red apple” Chief Louie who, like Wright and countless others, is in denial of the facts surrounding First Nations land claims, honest people earnestly seeking the facts would be well advised to listen to the words of Chief Arthur Manuel of the Sushwap nation who, in a recent talk on the Idle No More movement spoke about the obvious discrepancies that exist due to the lack of good faith in any government, be it provincial or federal, in resolving the vital land question issue. (Chief Manuel’s talk is on Youtube and can be googled)

Chief Manuel tells us that in the beginning prior to the arrival of the white settlers the native people possessed 100% of the land base. Then, after the colonial governments, both provincial and federal, illegally forced the First Nations onto minute portions of the land base they ended up with 0.36% of the land and the settlers with 99.64%. To go from 100% ownership to less than 1% was the colonial governments’ way of dealing with land claims which first began in 1866.

Bearing in mind what the First Nations unwittingly and unwillingly gave up to the colonialists and considering the fact that the federal goverment was responsible for the creation of the “band council” system that so many non-natives are now accusing of financial mismanagement, I find it difficult to sympathize in any way with Wright’s misguided assertions about how “his money” is being spent on First Nations.

We must never forget that the bulk of the 99.64% of First Nations territory has never been conquered by war or ceded to any subsequent government be it provincial or federal. A such, by natural law, it still belongs to the First Nations and until that fundamental problem is resolved in an amicable and just manner all other suppositions surrounding fiduciary costs to taxpayers is pointless and unproductive when discussing either land claims or fiscal mismanagement of taxpayer monies.

In conjunction with all this is the grim reality that these federally created bands in B.C. are now in debt to the banking cartel to the tune of 500 million dollars thanks to these prolonged and ongoing land claims negotiations that have been dragging on for the past 147 years.

Wright’s family may have been here for the past 225 years but relative to the past 10,000 years of uninterrupted occupancy by First Nations it pales into insignificance and serves no useful purpose in any serious discussion of First Nations land claims or the Idle No More movement.

Maybe, instead of subtle bashing of the First Nations, a little extrapolation is in order here so that those who feel so hard done by via their tax dollars can visualize the problem better. Imagine if we, the settlers, were to exchange places with the First Nations and all the newcomers to this land went to live on that 0.36% of reserve land and all the original inhabitants relocated to their former holdings. How well would Mr. Wright and the rest of the settlers fare in terms of economic survival? Would that 0.36 % provide for all their wants and needs?

The Mayan calendar has ended and a new beginning is upon us. I suggest to all the Wrights of the world that the Idle No More movement is just the start of an initiation process that will see both Indigenous First Nations and people of all races from around the world coming together and working to advance a way of stewardship and ownership and respect for our common Earth Mother that will allow us all to live in peace and harmony and plenty.

Arthur and Shastah Topham
Cottonwood, B.C.

RadicalPress Legal Update #5

NewLegalUpdateLogo 700

notice4RP

Dear Free Speech Supporters,

On Tuesday, November 27, 2012 my wife and I once again wended our way into Quesnel to attend what I thought was to be a meeting with a Justice of the Peace who was going to speak with my lawyer Douglas Christie via telephone at 1:30 pm and arrange dates for an arraignment and a preliminary hearing regarding the sec. 319(2) criminal charge of “Willful promotion of hatred against an identifiable group, people of the Jewish religion or ethnic origin” brought against me by B’nai Brith Canada via their two agents X and Y. That was what the JP stated during the previous meeting held on November 20, 2012.

Just prior to 1:30 pm the Justice came and told us that the meeting would be held in Judge’s Court instead at the same time.

When I was called up before the Honourable Judge Morgan the court clerk called Mr. Christie on the phone and upon answering Judge Morgan began to discuss the dates for the two issue and it was agreed upon that the arraignment would take place on April 2, 2013 at 1:30 pm and that preliminary inquiry would be set for the week of June 3 – 6, 2013.

Initially my lawyer had requested five days for the preliminary inquiry but for some reason unbeknownst to anyone present it was set for only four. Mr. Christie stated that he didn’t feel four days might be enough and given the fact that he was still awaiting disclosure from Crown Council Johnston of the relevant documents supporting the Crown’s reasons for the charge after a delay of over six months he felt that it was unreasonable to expect him to be able to ascertain the amount of time that might be required. That said the Judge still left it at four days.

Then the issue of the application to address bail conditions came up again. Crown council Jennifer Johnston told the Judge in no uncertain terms that the Crown was going to be pressing to have all of the original bail conditions reinstated when the bail hearing took place citing the “fact” that Det. Wilson had informed her that I was still posting articles on my website that Wilson deemed to be of the same calibre as those complained of by Agents X and Y.

The previous undertaking given to a judge which I am presently bound by came into effect on October 13, 2012 and did not include the following two conditions which were originally given to me by Det-Cst Terry Wilson back on May 16, 2012 when I was released from the Quesnel jail. At the time of my release I did not sign the document but that didn’t matter to the Crown who insist that it still is in effect.

These two conditions (and possibly more planned) are:

1. “You shall not post any information on any internet website that can be read by members of the general public.”

2. “You shall not operate, post to or manage or allow anyone to operate, post to or manage any internet site owned by you that can be accessed by the general public.”

It must of course be recognized that both of these Orwellian ultimatums fly in the face of my Charter of Rights and Freedoms as guaranteed by Canada’s so-called “Constitution.” This fact also appears not to have entered into the mind of Crown Council Jennifer Johnston.

Mr. Christie’s response to all this was that he finds it extremely difficult for him to argue against the Crown’s position when he is still waiting for the disclosure of the documents that would indicate the reasons why the Crown was taking such a hard line approach in defiance of my constitutional rights.

This of course brought up the subject of said disclosure materials which Crown Council had assured both Judge Morgan and Counsel Christie that she would be supplying Mr. Christie with when we last attended court on the 20th of November. That information, apparently on cd discs, never arrived at Mr. Christie’s office prior to November 27th.

Judge Morgan asked the Crown what the problem was stating that he thought the Crown had had sufficient time to get this matter together.

Crown Council Johnston then gave the Judge a swan song about how she really, really wanted to get it done but that she was just so busy and then launched into all the things that she had on her plate that prevented her from accomplishing what she had said she would do last time we met in court. She then added that the material on the cd’s had to be “vetted” prior to sending them to Mr. Christie and that there were so many pages that had to be gone over and examined and it was soooo important that the accused not be privy to these documents before they were vetted and so on and so forth.

When it came time for setting a date for the next bail application to be heard there was no agreement between either Crown Council or Mr. Christie as to when they would be able to meet and so Judge Morgan decided that he would set a date and that both parties would have to make sure they were in attendance. At this point Judge Morgan also told Mr. Christie that this would likely be the last time he would be permitted to attend via telephone and that after that he would need to appear in person. The date was then set for Thursday, December 13, 2012 at 1:30 pm and the allotted time for Mr. Christie to argue against the Crown’s proposed conditions would be 45 minutes.

That said Mr. Christie then asked the Judge if he would ensure that the Crown furnish him with all the documentation required so that he would have time to prepare his arguments and Crown Council immediately said that she would get the information to Mr. Christie well in advance of the 13th of December. Judge Morgan then stated that Crown would have to furnish Mr. Christie with the information by no later than December 11, 2012. Hardly sufficient time in which to prepare a proper argument especially in light of the fact that Crown most likely was going to argue that all of my posts on RadicalPress.com since November 2nd, 2012 were indicative of more “hatred” being published against the ‘victims’ of this alleged “hate” crime.

That ended the session.

Some final comments:

It has been over six months now since Det-Cst Terry Wilson and his “BC HATE CRIME TEAM” swooped down upon my wife and I while we were travelling up to Prince George, B.C. in order to arrest me on this bogus charge, outraging me and traumatizing my dear wife. All the drama and hoopla surrounding Hate Hunter Wilson’s premeditated assault upon my constitutional right to freedom of speech on the Internet was simply that – a staged performance designed to lend some form of legitimacy and authenticity to what was simply an attack by the state upon an otherwise law-abiding citizen; one who has been openly informing the public about the very foreign agents who were responsible for making the complaint to the RCMP that precipitated this subsequent ambush on my legal and human right to freedom of speech and freedom of expression.

Yet, for all the hullabaloo and the gravity of this said “hate crime” – one based solely upon the contents of my website RadicalPress.com – the Crown still refuses to supply my defence lawyer Douglas Christie with the required disclosure documents that they apparently used to determine that such a charge was justified.

Instead, they used this bogus allegation to justify obtaining an illegal search warrant which was then used to invade my home and steal all of my computers and electronic files. And, in addition to that, they also stole my firearms (my only means of personal safety in the rural area where I live) and then had the audacity to add a further bogus charge of “unlawful storage of firearms” to the initial false charge. All this was of course done in order to furnish their controlled media with yet another juicy bit of misinformation that could then be used to smear and slander my person and give the impression that I was not only a vile hate-mongerer but also armed and dangerous!

The whole gist of this massive scam is to cover up the fact that the Jewish lobbies here in Canada have the judiciary and the RCMP and the media by the balls and whenever they wish to silence someone who is revealing this fact to the people of Canada all they have to do is put the squeeze on RCMP Hate Hunters like Det-Cst Wilson and Levas and the legal system suddenly kicks in to carry out the bidding of their task masters the Zionist lobby acting at the behest of its controlling arm B’nai Brith International. The perps in this charade then sit back and let the taxpayers of Canada pay all the expenses while I, a senior citizen on a very limited, fixed income, am forced to defend myself against this specious, anti-Charter of Rights charge.

Must be nice to have that sort of influence upon a nation that purports to be “free and democratic.”

One final note regarding my website.

Suspended

Readers were informed that my website host Netfirms.com has issued a decree at the behest of a complaint from Hate Hunter Wilson that my website would be “terminated” in 48 hours unless I removed all the supposed “hate” content alleged by Wilson to be on the site.

Upon receiving said notification I replied to the Corporate representative for Netfirms.com, a person going by the name of “Zach P”, requesting further information as to what exactly I was expected to remove in order to meet Netfirms.com policy rules. I also requested of my readership that they write to Zach P and let him know that they did not agree with Hate Hunter Wilson’s assessment of my website and that Netfirms.com ought to leave it alone. All of these efforts of course proved to be futile. Zach P never had the decency to even respond to anyone, a clear indication that he and his company Netfirms.com could give a shit about what Canadians think and feel about the issue of freedom of speech on the Internet.

Realizing that I had but 48 hours to save my site I had it moved to a different server and now it is still alive and functioning but for how long is anyone’s guess.

The fact that Hate Hunter Wilson has been sleuthing about behind the scenes doing his damnedest to destroy my website speaks volumes in terms of the underhanded tactics that these supposed ” ‘Royal Canadian’ peace officers” will resort to in order to due the bidding of their foreign controllers. My lawyer tells me that even though Hate Hunter Wilson’s tactics are unethical and immoral and deplorable they still are not illegal and so there’s nothing that I can do about it. I’ll leave readers to judge whether or not H.H. Wilson’s actions ought to be allowed.

And  so it goes as the wheels of justice here in Canuckistan slowly grind away and erode my rights and freedoms along with yours.

Again I would ask of readers that they assist me financially in my battle with the censors by sending donations to the cause. Due to the fact that the Crown is refusing to give the required disclosure to my lawyer I am not able to furnish legal aid with the required documents that they demand before looking at whether or not I might qualify for legal financial assistance. This leaves me in the unenviable position of having to rely solely upon donations to pay for my legal expenses and while I have been receiving some assistance from a few kind souls who realize the importance of this case to all Canadians the amount of money thus sent comes nowhere near that necessary to pay for my lawyer to appear in court in Quesnel to defend me against these false charges.

As such I would once again implore readers to give serious consideration to helping me out by either sending a donation via PayPal using either a PayPal account or a credit card or else sending a cheque or Money Order to me via snail mail at the following postal address. Cash of course also works.

Arthur Topham
4633 Barkerville Highway
Quesnel, B.C.
Canada
V2J 6T8

To access my PayPal button please go to my blog http://www.quesnelcariboosentinel.com The button is up on the right hand corner of the Home Page.

Thanks for all the support from those good folks who had the courage of their convictions to write a letter to Netfirms.com on my behalf. While these excellent letters may have had no effect upon the corporate heads at Netfirms.com they certainly provide a strong and positive endorsement for both myself and RadicalPress.com and for that reason alone they are gratefully received and acknowledged.

For Peace and Love and Truth and Justice for All,

I remain,

Sincerely,

Arthur Topham
Pub/Ed
RadicalPress.com
“Digging to the root of the issues since 1998”

Arthur Topham charged with hate crime – QuesnelCaribooObserver

ObserverATChargedwithHateCrime

newRPlogo

Dear Free Speech Supporters,

Don’t ask me why my website is still up for I haven’t a clue at this point. It was, according to the ultimatum which I received from the corporate office of Netfirms.com, slated to be “terminated” at 12:11:12 on Saturday, November 23, 2012.

There are a number of reasons why it is still up but I won’t speculate on them at this point. My hunch is that Zach P the person who sent me the threatening email likely hasn’t returned to his office to carry out his threat. It may have something to do with all the excellent letters of support sent to him on my behalf (I would like to think so) but I just don’t have that much faith in any company that would do what it did to begin with.

On a positive note though I would like readers to know that the weekend edition of my local community newspaper, the Quesnel Cariboo Observer carried the following front page story about my being charged with a hate crime.

I wish to acknowledge the paper and its editor, Autumn MacDonald and thank them for being the only mainstream media in the world to actually contact me for my side of the story rather than just repeat the Zionist-controlled Reuters News Agency’s slanderous press release that appeared across Canada as well as in Israel and other foreign countries.

It’s heartening indeed to know that there remains at least one newspaper with the courage and the honesty to present both sides of this issue rather than automatically assume that I am guilty of said allegations before any trial has occurred.

I would ask readers to give some consideration to responding to the Letters to the Editor section of the paper and let the Editor know what you think of the story. If you do wish to write I would also suggest keeping the word count under the 250 word limit to ensure that your submission has a good chance of being printed.

Send any letters to Autumn Macdonald editor@quesnelobserver.com

Arthur Topham
Pub/Ed
RadicalPress.com
“Digging to the root of the issues since 1998?

Note: I have included the text of the article as one would otherwise have to  purchase a subscription to the QC Observer in order to read this story. Ed.
————————————————–
Arthur Topham charged with hate crime

http://www.quesnelobserver.com/news/180608751.html?c=n
By Autumn MacDonald – Quesnel Cariboo Observer
November 23, 2012

After waiting five months, Arthur Topham has now been officially charged with willful promotion of hatred.

RCMP searched and seized property of the Quesnel resident in late May of this year, after it was determined there were “reasonable grounds the offence of promotion of hatred was committed.”

Crown officially moved forward on the charge earlier this month.

Since then Topham has had to comply with certain conditions, including restricted Internet access and is prohibited from maintaining his websites (including the Radical Press domain.)

Crown continues to request the courts permission on further restrictions.

Topham, who adamantly denies the charge, says he’s hopeful having his day in court will raise awareness surrounding free speech and the definition of “hate crimes.”

“This is not to say that I have full confidence in Canada’s judicial system but it will hopefully give me an opportunity to present the facts and the truth before a judge and jury of my peers; something that would never have happened if the case had been decided by a tribunal,” he said.

“In that regard, therefore, I welcome the opportunity to challenge these Draconian “hate” laws that have been set up to protect vested interests here in Canada.”

Topham says ever since he was charged with a hate crime in 2007 he’s been forced to battle with the Canadian Rights Commission and the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal.

Back in 2008 the Quesnel Cariboo Observer published a story in which Topham had received a complaint from the Canadian Human Rights Commission stating he was promoting hatred towards Jews and citizens of Israel.

Topham maintains a site, RadicalPress.com with the tagline “Digging to the root of the issues since 1998.”

Currently Topham is permitted to continue posting to his site; Crown is seeking to prohibit posting.

“Of course my immediate concern is that the crown wants to assume that I have already been found guilty and therefore shouldn’t be allowed to write or post on my website in
order to defend myself against these spurious charges,” Topham said.

“Given how the msm is smearing me already I feel it would be highly unfair to take away my charter rights prior to this case being heard in a court of law.”

Topham’s next court appearance is slated for Nov. 27.

————

Radical Press Legal Update #4

NewLegalUpdateLogo 700

notice4RP

Here’s freedom to him who would speak,
Here’s freedom to him who would write;
For there’s none ever feared that the truth should be heard,
Save him whom the truth would indict!

ROBERT BURNS (1759–96)

November 23, 2012

 


Dear Freedom of Speech supporters,

This will most likely be my last email before Netfirms.com shuts down RadicalPress.com.

All efforts thus far to even CONTACT Zach P have proven futile. After sending out his ultimatum that I remove “content” from my website, content which he did not specify, Zach went off to celebrate “Thanksgiving Day” in the good ol’ US of A and will most likely not be back at his corporate desk until this morning. As of now, 9:46 AM Pacific Standard Time, I have still had no word back from Zach P even though he specifically asked me to reply to him if I had any concerns about Netfirms.com “terminating” my website.

Zach P’s letter to me was sent on November 21, 2012 at 12::11:12 PM PST. The 48 hour limit therefore ends in a couple of hours.

It may bear repeating his words contained in this ultimatum:

“We have been advised by a visitor to your web site radicalpress.com that such web site contains content that is alleged to be untrue, offensive, slanderous, harassing or controversial in nature.

Accordingly, please remove such content within 48 hours of this notice. Failure to delete such content within such period will result in termination of your website.  The notice we received is below….

Should you have further questions, please contact us.

Regards,
Zach P
Corporate Support
———————-
As I said all of my efforts to write to Zach P have proven to be fruitless to date. I phoned the Netfirms.com in Toronto and they put me on to a woman in Arizona who was a “Supervisor”. She towed the same Corporate line that Zach P is following and played her game of sophistry with me as we went around and around the “all you gotta do is remove the offensive content but we won’t tell you what it is ha ha” bush for about fifteen minutes at which point I admonished her for her recalcitrant, illogical attitude and then hung up.

The fact remains that the culprit throughout all of these shenanigans is none other than our good Zionist toadie for the B’nai Brith Canada, Det-Cst Terry Wilson of the BC HATE CRIME TEAM.

The fact that he has been relentlessly pursuing his agenda of sabotaging my website even though he is fully aware that I have all the right in the world to own it and run it and post articles and news on it is clearly an act of criminal negligence and one of malicious intent and an issue which I will be discussing with my lawyer Douglas Christie.

Wilson, as well as the Crown, are absolutely aware of the FACT that this alleged sec. 319(2) “hate crime” is now before the Supreme Court of Canada yet they are purposely pretending that it doesn’t matter a damn and that they will continue to pursue their hidden agenda of destroying the very evidence that potentially has the force of truth necessary to blow their  “hate” case right out of the murky waters from wherein it first emerged. This makes both the RCMP and the Crown itself guilty of criminal negligence and blatant malfeasance on their part regarding this criminal matter.

Two important points beyond that are:

1. If and when my website is “terminated” I will most likely lose email contact via my normal address radical@radicalpress.com . If this situation does arise I would ask that anyone wishing to contact me via email please use the following address: editor@quesnelcariboosentinel.com . If that doesn’t work then try my third email address which is caribooplacers@gmail.com .

Also I can be reached at 1 250 992 3479 as well. Please leave a message if I don’t answer the phone.

2. Of course I’d be a bloody poor cyber warrior if I hadn’t already anticipated these moves on the part of RCMP cheka’s commissars and so I would just like to say here that I am working on remedying this deplorable situation and will do my utmost to be back up and running as soon as is humanly possible.

For Truth, Justice and Freedom of Speech for Everyone,

I remain,

Sincerely,

Arthur Topham
Pub/Ed
RadicalPress.com
“Digging to the root of the issues since 1998”

Traitors in our Midst by Arthur Topham

BBTRAITORS

Traitors in our Midst

by Arthur Topham
Publisher
RadicalPress.com

November 22, 2012

“Thoughts are free and are subject to no rule. On them rests the freedom of man and they tower above the light of nature.

~ Paracelsus, Selected Writings

When I learned yesterday that the cop who was instrumental in spying on my website RadicalPress.com for over a year on behalf of the Zionist Jew lobbyist group B’nai Brith Canada had sent a letter of complaint to my web hosting company Netfirms.com whining and crying that I have been charged with a section 319(2) Criminal Code “Hate Crime” offence that he felt might “contravene” Netfirms.com’s policy (specifically section 4(b)(i)), I was not only disgusted beyond belief but angered that the RCMP would stoop so low in order to do the bidding of these foreign interest groups who set themselves up in Canada behind their phoney false masks of respectability only to then proceed to work behind  the scenes to undermine the democratic freedoms and rights that so many of our fore bearers fought and died to achieve.

Knowing full well that this case is now before the Supreme Court of Canada and that the contents on my website are a vital component of my defence in this trumped up charge, Det-Cst Terry Wilson still couldn’t resist his ongoing urge to do whatever possible in the dark to try and destroy not only years of my work but to also destroy evidence that he knows damn well will make the Crown’s attempt to find me guilty of this spurious charge virtually impossible to accomplish.

Now I could understand the two complainants in this case, both Zionist agents for B’nai Brith Canada who laid the complaint against me initially, pulling off a stunt like this. As a matter of fact the whole sordid, pathetic affair first began on Valentine’s Day, Feb. 14, 2007 when I received my first hate letter from a “Brian Esker” who later turned out to none other than an agent of B’nai Brith Canada masking himself in digital drag so he could safely threaten me and my website.

This foreign agent pulled this precise same thing back in 2007 prior to laying a formal complaint against me and my website using Section 13(1) of the Canadian Human Rights Act in order to accuse me of promoting, “ongoing hatred affecting persons identifiable as Jews and/or as citizens of Israel.”

At that time I had a web hosting server by the name of Alentus.com. This agent of B’nai Brith, who  screams bloody murder that he had nothing at all to do with it, sent what appears to be the exact same complaint to the server and bingo! they too gave me 48 hours to find another server or else my website would be liquidated like some counter-revolutionary Zak imprisoned in the wastelands of the Soviet gulag during the 1930s.

I had no time to get help and all of my letters to Alentus might as well have been addressed to Atlantis because they obviously didn’t reach anyone of intelligence and as a result I lost my former RadicalPress forum and an abundance of historic, priceless data when a last ditch attempt was made to salvage the site.

This second attempt on B’nai Brith’s part to destroy RadicalPress.com obviously was planned to include a Gentile dupe so that they could cover up their bloody tracks and what better dupe than the duplicitous Detective Terry Wilson, a self-serving, slithering snake in the grass who sold his soul to the Zionist devil decades ago and has since been serving Zion in their relentless quest to gain absolute control over the one means of free expression still left on this planet – the Internet.

So I immediately replied to “Zach P” the “Corporate Support” goof who sent out the Ultimatum. I asked him to let me know what content it was that I was being asked to “remove” within 48 hours. I then wrote back two more times as Zach P had ended his threatening letter with the statement, “Should you have further questions, please contact us.” Yah sure Zach.

I then sent out an APB release asking supporters to write to Zach P and tell him that RadicalPress.com wasn’t a “hate propaganda” site and that they wanted it left up. Letters are still coming in that were sent to Netfirms.com.

This morning I spoke to a webmaster friend of mine who thought the email address for Netfirms.com looked a bit weird and so I phoned their office in Toronto and spoke to a support representative. He did his best to figure out what was going on and did confirm that the email address wasn’t a scam but eventually he had to transfer me over to a supervisor located in Arizona.

I spoke to this woman for quite some time trying to reason with her on a number of things but all to no avail. She would say, “Well, if you would just remove any content ‘that is alleged to be untrue, offensive, slanderous, harassing or controversial in nature’ then there shouldn’t be a problem.” In turn I would reply, “Well, madam, if I KNEW what content that Det Wilson was referring to then I might possibly be able to remove it.”

And she went on to say that it was most unfortunate that all the Corporate people were away on holidays today and I would reply, “Oh I’m certain that Zach P was fully aware when he sent me this 48 hour email that he wouldn’t be returning to his office until the last minute.” And she would repeat…..the same old line all over.

Finally she advised me to just “park” the site before the 48 hours were up or else there was a good chance that Netfirms.com would delete it and everything would be lost. Parking it of course would mean that no one would then be able to access it.

I tried in vain to tell her that the website was the subject of a Supreme Court case here in Canada and that it was impossibly for me to remove any content or else I could face additional criminal charges. That wasn’t a concern for  her. I added that Netfirms.com itself could possibly face litigation for destroying evidence if they deleted my site. Then she would begin again with the “…if you remove the content (she was always implying that I must know what the content is) before the 48 hours…..etc.”

Finally before hanging up she had the audacity to say that if and when I was found innocent of said allegations that  all I had to do was let Netfirms.com know and they would be “happy” to place the site online once again!

I told her quite frankly that no, that would never happen and that for the rest of my days I would do whatever I could to tell other Canadians what a phoney, hypocritical web hosting site Netfirms.com truly is and that it was just one more tool for censorship like all the other Zionist media.

NetfirmsCensors

But getting back to these traitors, Wilson and Levas. To think that this supreme sell-out has been working around the clock to destroy my site behind closed doors instead of allowing the courts to come a decision is one of the most low-down, nauseating moves anyone could make let alone someone who professes to be a “Peace Officer” and a protector of all that is honourable, Canadian, honest and decent.

No matter how one looks at it these two deluded, mind-controlled zio-zombies are TRAITORS to their country! They ought to be shipped off to Israel where their true sentiments and crooked, deceitful ways would be most appreciated. It’s high time we filled a boat load or two of these Zionist 5th columnists, along with the two complainants in this sec. 319(2) charge and all the rest of the traitorous executive of B’nai Brith Canada and sent them back to their “spiritual homeland” where they belong. Why they are here in Canada doing their utmost to destroy our way of life is something each and every Canadian should seriously begin to think about before we all lose our freedom to speak our minds.
————-

RCMP arrest challenged Quesnel man at gunpoint for playing with a space gun

http://www.bclocalnews.com/bc_cariboo/quesnelobserver/news/89563377.html#comment-42385726
Quesnel Cariboo Observer
Innocent

RodneyMoffat
Rodney Moffat clutches the toy gun which caused RCMP officers to arrest him at gunpoint.Autumn MacDonald photo

By Autumn MacDonald – Quesnel Cariboo Observer

March 30, 2010

The father of a mentally challenged, 90-pound Quesnel man is enraged after RCMP arrested his son at gunpoint.

The apprehension occurred Monday afternoon after a neighbour claimed to have seen a man carrying a gun by the mobile home park near Correlieu Secondary.

Rodney Moffat, 49, was walking past the school, to a store to buy milk when police apprehended him.

“They, they threw me down,” Rodney sobbed as he spoke to the Observer.

“They handcuffed me. They yelled at me.”

Afterwards, Rodney was taken to hospital, where he was treated with tranquilizers. On Tuesday, he was icing his wrist and bruised ribs.

The ordeal began when Rodney was outside his home, playing with a neon orange and silver plastic toy space gun, which Rodney had tucked into the waist of his pants.

A neighbour mistook the gun and called RCMP. Before they arrived, Rodney had returned the toy gun to his house, then embarked on his journey for milk.

Rodney’s parents – Eva and Karl – cannot believe police arrested their son.

“Can’t they tell the difference?” Karl said, shaking his head.

Karl, a retired police officer of 31 years with the Windsor Police Department, moved his family to the Quesnel area 16 years ago.

“Rodney’s been here that entire time,” Karl said.

“He poses no threat. He’s 90 pounds!”

“I have no idea why they used such excessive force,” Eva added, taking a deep breath.

“We feel betrayed. They’re the ones who are suppose to protect him.”

RCMP issued a release stating police must take any report of open possession of a firearm seriously.

“This is even more of a concern when an incident involving a possible firearm occurs near a school,” the release states.

It goes on to say “once examined the toy gun appeared quite realistic tucked into the man’s pants.

“It is very difficult to tell the difference between a genuine hand gun and a toy replica.”

“I didn’t mean to…” Rodney starts, then stops, his whole body vibrates, he mashes a tissue under his thick glasses.

“I didn’t mean to cause any trouble, dad.”

—————-

STUNNING VICTORY FOR FREEDOM OF SPEECH by Merv Ritchie


September 5, 2009

FROM THE EDITOR’S DESK:


RADICAL EDITOR & PUBLISHER ARTHUR TOPHAM
_______________________________________

Dear Radical Reader,

The recent and still very provocative ruling by Canadian Human Rights Tribunal Member Athanasios Hadjis on September 2, 2009, (the Lemire Decision) – one that holds great promise of finally bringing down the massive house of cards better known as the Canadian Human Rights Commission – has finally freed up at least one of countless mainstream media online news service agencies, allowing them the much needed freedom to give some long sought coverage to the CHRC’s “hate crime” complaint case involving Agent Z and the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada v. Arthur Topham and RadicalPress.com.

As the Editor and Publisher of RadicalPress.com I must gratefully and gleefully take off my hat to Merv Richie, publisher and owner of the Terrace Daily.ca, an online news service located in the northwestern community of Terrace, British Columbia, Canada and extend a firm handshake to him and say thank you for having both the wisdom and the courage to do what the rest of Canada’s supposedly independent and objective news media should have done two years ago when this controversial case first became public.

I had long hoped that my own community newspaper, the Quesnel Cariboo Observer, would have been the one to have broke the story but after initially covering the issue back in early 2008 they were immediately silenced by a false threat of a law suit from the very personage who now appears to have lost his case against against Marc Lemire in this outstanding ruling – none other than Ricardo Warmouse, good friend of Agent Z, the Complainant who laid the infamous sec. 13(1) “hate crime” charge against myself and my website back in July of 2007.

While this important ruling is the first major step in the eventual dismantling of this quasi-judicial internal censorship syndicate created by the Zionist lobby groups currently permeating all aspects of Canadian government, industry, media and academia it isn’t the final end for this vile, draconian sec. 13(1) anti-free speech law. As I recently wrote to one email correspondent regarding this issue, “When one is dealing with a deadly serpent it’s best not to take your attention off it until its head is severed from its body. In my case the head of this viper is still very much intact.”

Mr. Merv Richie has done a great service for everyone who believes in our Charter rights to freedom of expression and freedom of the press and he deserves a round of applause and encouragement for his willingness to put his shoulder to wheel at a time when this vehicle of expression is only just beginning to budge out from the Stalinist rut it’s been stuck in for the past twenty odd years. Please do write to him and thank him and pass this article to all you can.

Shine your Light for Love, Peace & Justice for All,

Arthur Topham
Publisher/Editor
The Radical Press
Canada’s Radical News Network
“Digging to the root of the issues since 1998”
http://www.radicalpress.com
radical@radicalpress.com
——————————

http://www.terracedaily.ca/show4688a/STUNNING_VICTORY_FOR_FREEDOM_OF_SPEECH

STUNNING VICTORY FOR FREEDOM OF SPEECH
by Merv Ritchie

2nd September 2009

This morning a new light shines across Canada. The Canadian Human Rights Tribunal (CHRT) has had its fangs trimmed. Section 13, the law that prohibits speaking openly about uncomfortable truths has finally been defeated. Commonly referred to as the anti hate law it has been used to stifle criticism of policy and ideology on almost every medium. The first use of the law was to force a man, John Ross Taylor, to stop using his own personal telephone answering machine to leave messages for people that wanted to call in and hear what he had to say. Generally his thoughts were against Canada’s immigration laws. The latest use of the law was to charge a man, Marc Lemire, who ran an internet chat forum. Although he did not approve postings to the message board (it was an open message forum) he was held to account for what others posted.

A BC website (operated by a former Kitimat native) is also currently under indictment by the CHRT for criticizing an ultra right wing faction of Israeli/Jewish politics called Zionists. Many do not like Arthur Topham’s blunt, unorthodox, politically incorrect writings on his website, Radicalpress.com, however he provides evidence and background to back up everything he writes. Truth is not a defence against the CHRT as every person and organization that has come under their radar has discovered, as they all were convicted. That is a 100 percent prosecutorial success rate, a rate unheard of anywhere in the world except in this secretive organization that has recently been investigated by the RCMP.

In his decision Athanasios D. Hadjis set a very high bar for new prosecutions under this act. Only the most vile and alarmist writings should be considered for prosecutions and the Charter of Rights and Freedoms protects Canadians, allows Canadians, to discuss issues that are not politically correct. The conclusion is as follows;

V. CONCLUSION
I have determined that Mr. Lemire contravened s. 13 of the Act in only one of the instances alleged by Mr. Warmouse, namely the AIDS Secrets article. However, I have also concluded that s. 13(1) in conjunction with ss. 54(1) and (1.1) are inconsistent with s. 2(b) of the Charter, which guarantees the freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression. The restriction imposed by these provisions is not a reasonable limit within the meaning of s. 1 of the Charter. Since a formal declaration of invalidity is not a remedy available to the Tribunal (see Cuddy Chicks Ltd. V. Ontario (Labour Relations Board), [1991] 2 S.C.R. 5), I will simply refuse to apply these provisions for the purposes of the complaint against Mr. Lemire and I will not issue any remedial order against him (see Nova Scotia (Workers’ Compensation Board) v. Martin, 2003 SCC 54 at paras. 26-7).

His comments on the AIDS Secret article in part are as follows;

In my view, the material found in the AIDS Secrets article expresses unusually strong and deep-felt emotions of detestation and vilification towards homosexuals in particular. The article is rife with hyperbole and moral condemnation. Homosexuals, and Blacks to a lesser extent, are denigrated as purveyors of a “killer” that is on the loose, agonizingly destroying the lives of American children and adults alike. Extreme language is used to vilify them and their lifestyles. They are portrayed as a powerful force that is conspiring to bring harm to others. Rather than using the statistics and studies in a dispassionately scientific manner, the article adopts an alarmist, almost hysteric tone, which along the above mentioned characterizations, is likely to expose them to hatred or contempt.

This is a very dramatic shift in the manner in which Canadians might discuss issues. It allows for a much greater freedom to engage in discussions. It also has very profound impacts on internet websites and forums.

Although Mr. Lemire did not compose the AIDS Secrets article he allowed it to be posted on his website and therefore was found responsible for distributing this material.

The conclusion found Section 13 to be at odds with the Charter of Rights. The next few weeks and months will determine the future of the CHRT. It has caused much grief for many individuals who wanted to expose some knowledge they discovered to the general public. Today a fresh wind of freedom to speak out has blown across Canada.
———–

Also see the following: Two of your articles are posted on our site here. Merv.

http://www.terracedaily.ca/show13s/PROVOCATIVE

—————–

Arthur Topham is the Publisher and Editor of RadicalPress.com. He is currently involved in a free speech battle with the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada.

He is also in extremely dire need of financial support to sustain this battle with the forces of repression and censorship as he is not able to work during this period of intense litigation with the Canadian Human Rights Commission and the CHR Tribunal. Any donations therefore would be most welcome. Please see the following url on the Home Page (upper right hand corner) http://www.radicalpress.com/?page_id=657 regarding donations. Also there is a “DONATE” button there for Paypal or here at https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=4466120 . Feel free to use any of them if you can help out. Thanks.

Arthur welcomes all feedback to his articles and can be reached at radical@radicalpress.com .

For the Full Monty on the complaint case involving RadicalPress.com and B’nai Brith Canada please see: http://www.radicalpress.com/?page_id=995