[Editor’s Note: This interview with Gilad Atzmon, undoubtedly, is one of the best examples I have read of an explanation for why the so-called “Left” here in the West has lost its relevancy in terms of the greater, burning question of global, moral outrage and dissatisfaction with both the state of Israel and its fundamental, supportive ideology known as political Zionism.

It identifies Marxism for what it truly is: a Zionist/Talmudic/Jewish concept based on a disbelief in God coupled with a supremacist attitude toward others who do not fit the cold, Marxist calculations of what defines a family, a community and a nation and also what is relevant to others in terms of their innate spiritual beliefs and/or consciousness of good and evil.

Gilad’s clear, frank and unambiguous responses to Miriam Cotton’s assumptions about Zionism and the Left were, for me, a joy to read. They acted like a cleanser, wiping away the grime that both smothers and conceals the seemingly endless discourse and rhetoric which inevitably composes the Marxist dialectic.

This interview is indeed a welcome response to these liberal assertions that the Left espouses under the guise of being humanists and ought to be seriously read and seriously promoted online in order to assist others who are still struggling with this divisive and essentially moral, ethic and spiritual Marxist conundrum that continues to plague humankind’s ability to live in peace and harmony and understanding.]

Shine your Light for Love, Peace & Justice for All,

Arthur Topham
Publisher/Editor
The Radical Press
Canada’s Radical News Network
“Digging to the root of the issues since 1998″
http://www.radicalpress.com
radical@radicalpress.com

http://www.gilad.co.uk/writings/touching-left-islam-israeli-lobby-chomsky-and-many-other-hot.html

Touching Left, Islam, Israeli Lobby, Chomsky and Many other Hot Topics

Sunday, June 27, 2010

Discussion with Gilad Atzmon by Miriam Cotton

Introduction by Miriam Cotton

Gilad Atzmon is a world renowned saxophonist and musician with a deep political passion for humanist issues and concern for the fate of the Palestinian people.  He has written extensively about the issue and been published widely.  As a self-exiled, former Jewish Israeli and IDF soldier, Atzmon’s perspective within the raging public discourse on Palestine is relatively unique.  His views are bitterly opposed by some among anti-Zionist Jewish groups, who accuse him of anti-Semitism and of being a ‘self-hater’.

Atzmon fiercely resists the charge of anti-Semitism and insists that he is concerned with a proper and thorough examination of the ideology of what it is to be Jewish – in particular about how the notion of the  Jews as ‘a chosen people’ has led, as he sees it, inexorably to the rise of Zionism and its present disproportionate influence on world affairs.

Atzmon also takes issue with the Western Left which he believes has failed either to recognize the true extent of Zionist influence (he singles Noam Chomsky out for criticism) and of not understanding how western Marxist/socialist ideologies are incompatible with Islamic societies and therefore can be of no use to them.   These and other issues are discussed with him below.  There are many things in what Atzmon says below that beg further question and comment but hopefully the exchange has served to illustrate his interpretation of the Palestinian situation and to provide an insight on a less frequently aired or understood perspective.

Miriam Cotton

MediaBite (Ireland) http://www.mediabite.org/about_us.html

June 21st 2010

MC: Following the murder and kidnap of unarmed aid activists in international waters by Israel, General Petraeus has said the situation [in Gaza] is no longer sustainable.  Though he was in no sense condemning what Israel had done, do you think there may be a beginning of an end to unconditional US support for Israel?

GA: It is actually the other way around. It is Israel that ditches America. Israeli leadership realises that with America in the background the Jewish state won’t be able to pursue its next two lethal plans: Nakaba 2 and dismantling Iranian nuclear capacity. Israel realises that if it wants to maintain its Jews only state as a regional power, it must ethnically cleanse the rest of the Palestinians. Israel is also convinced that its only chance of surviving in the region is if it maintains a nuclear hegemony. The USA makes things difficult for the Jewish State at the moment; it tries to slow Israel down.  I believe that it is Israel that is leading the conflict rather than being subject to it.

MC: But surely that assessment overlooks some important factors.  Nobody can seriously doubt that the US obsession with the region is entirely to do with oil, gas and geo-strategic matters such as Russian and Chinese proximity to these resources, in particular.

GA: This is a good way to put it. However you may also wonder what American interests are, who defines these interests and who shapes them. As it happens, AIPAC (American Israeli Public Affairs Committee) has been pretty effective in shaping American interests; we also know that the Wolfowitz doctrine made it into Bush’s doctrine. For the last three decades Americans failed to see the clear discrepancy between cheap oil and alliance with Israel. They might start to understand it now.

MC:   But the Bush family was/is an oil dynasty too - with ties to as many if not more Arabic vested interests as to the Israelis - there are many more non-AIPAC, US vested interests like these than are in AIPAC.  Everything the US has done there since the beginning of its so-called ‘war on terror’ - and long beforehand - has been aimed at securing the Middle East and about energy and other resources.

GA: This is all true.  It is also true that AIPAC won’t necessarily interfere with unrelated political matters unless it involves Zionist, Israeli or Jewish interests. However, the Jewish lobby in America and in the UK has managed to shape the English speaking Empire’s vision of its needs and interests. From an American perspective, instead of admitting that American soldiers were actually sent to fight war for Israel, they were told instead that they were sent to die in the name of moral interventionism and democracy.  They were actually told that they were ‘liberating the Iraqi people’.  How wonderful! The oil and Israeli interests were presented as side issues. As we know, oil prices didn’t drop after 2003. And yet, Sadam Hussein, the bitterest enemy of Israel was removed. In the long run this plan didn’t work for Israel either. Iran had become the unchallenged Muslim leading power. Inshalah it also becomes a nuclear super power soon.  This would obviously deter the Israelis from accomplishing its endless imperial aspirations.

MC: There is no other country in the Middle East in which the US and its allies could position the vast military threat that Israel has been made into if they are to achieve their ambitions for the  region.  The realisation of Zionist ambitions for Israel was and still is a secondary consideration for the US, despite the relatively powerful Israeli lobby.

GA: I am not so sure at all. I actually think that the Zionist Lobby has managed to destroy the American empire. I argue that the Credit Crunch is in fact a Zio-Punch. I argue that Greenspan created an economy boom to divert attention from Wolfowitz’ wars.   The Zionists in fact have managed to bring down every super power they cling to. Britain, France and now America.  You have to allow yourself to  admit that the ‘War on Terror’ was actually a Zionist led war against Islam, a battle that was there to serve Israeli interests.

MC: Israel has been funded and encouraged to develop a nuclear arsenal of several hundred warheads, while the Iranians who do not even have one, but who control a lot of oil, are deemed to be a threat to world peace.  Frankly, in these circumstances the Iranians and others would be justified in thinking they need some means of defending themselves against the only real threat at present- and against those who are in fact being the most provocative as well as doing the vast majority of the killing: US-Israel.

GA: This is indeed a very valid point. From an Iranian perspective, nuclear military capacity is a defensive means. The Iranians are constantly under a nuclear threat and so are the rest of the countries in the region and beyond.

MC: Britain and America don’t fight any wars that they don’t want to fight - not even justifiable wars, unless there is a percentage in it for them.

GA: Are you sure about this, or is that something we all prefer to believe?  As it happens both in Britain and America the political parties are funded heavily by Jewish pro Israeli lobbies. Haim Saban, the multi-billionaire Israeli fund raiser for the American Democratic Party said last year that the best way to influence America is through political funding, the media and think tanks. There you go. Even the vision of ‘American interests’ can be no more than false interests when they have been manipulated into an alignment with what are really Israeli interests. At the end of the day, it is far cheaper to by a western politician than buying a tank. It is far cheaper to recruit a ‘new friend of Israel’ than flying an F15 for one hour.

MC: Israel is essentially a creation of the British and other European powers - and the oil was firmly at the front of their minds even way back then.

GA: This is another myth that people like Chomsky want us to believe in. In fact the Balfour Declaration was there to pull America into the war. It was there to push Jewish German and Russian bankers to change their allegiance from Germany to Britain so they could fund the new American war. Amos Alon presents an embarrassing chapter in Jewish history in his monumental book The Pity of It All. In fact it  worked for the British. Two months after the Declaration, America was in the war.  This wasn’t about oil. It was another war funded by a Jewish political lobby.

(more…)

On behalf of my lovely wife Shastah and myself I want to take this moment to thank everyone who made our trip to the 24th annual George Orwell dinner in Victoria, B.C. a reality.

Travel from our relatively remote area of the province to the island is expensive and it was only due to the generosity of those who donated funds that we were able to attend this important gathering of free speech advocates from across Canada.

This was the second time that we were able to enjoy the fellowship of people on the front lines of those fighting to retain the right to speak out their truths in the face of a brutal and alarmingly dangerous force: the government of Canada and its bureaucratic agent known as the Canadian Human Rights Commission (CHRC).

Due to time restrictions at the moment I cannot elaborate on the meeting but will do so over the next while.

Arthur Topham

Pub/Ed

RadicalPress.com

Mary and Child - a 1913 oil painting by Adolf Hitler
_______________________________________________________________________

From: Phishna phishna@yahoo.com
“The stupid Christians can’t seem to figure out the “Antichrist” has to be a Jew or Jew-tool like Bush-Obama because the Jews hate Christianity.”

Dear Phishna,

Normally, after about three days or so, “phish” begin to take on a peculiar odour that most find offensive. In your case, due to you and I being co-joined in a certain sense by email connections with similar lists, I find that every so often I’m confronted with your malodorous and ignorant little tantrums regarding those who have consciously accepted Jesus Christ as their spiritual representation of what ideally can be were the world not permeated and torn asunder by the likes of those who we now recognize as the synagogue of satan or in atheist terminology, Zionists.

What likely stinks the most about your short-sighted, puerile little bursts of venomous hatred and contempt for the Christos is your assumed attitude that Christians haven’t figured out who or what is represented by that term “Anti-Christ.” Why you would even go there at this stage of the game, given the ample volume of critiques that exist on the net regarding this situation, is beyond me. But what it does indicate is that you, and not the Christians, are the one with deep-seated issues as may pertain to questions of spirituality and its application to the wonderful world of political intrigue.

I would be the first person to admit that there are a substantial number of Christians who have succumbed to the Zionist subterfuge that’s been ongoing in the West since at least the 16th Century. If any religious group were subjected to such a long term assault by a seditious and ungodly group of sadistic psychopaths enjoying and exploiting the advantages endless supplies of coin and all which that implies in terms of economic, social, and political influence, I’m sure that after four hundred years of serious infiltration there would be a decidedly and marked impression made upon the host subject, and respecting the Christians this has obviously been the case.

But your seemingly endless frothing and condemnation belies more than what your readers might think or see upon the surface of such slander and begs the question of why you would be motivated to add to the already voluminous amount of invective aimed at those who perceive the Light of the Christos as one which gives the world a good and positive ideal or image to ground itself upon in times of deep and troubling strife and suffering by countless millions around the globe.

Whenever I witness your vituperative sarcasm, bordering I sense on what can only be construed as a mild, yet illustrative example of sadism in this regard, my immediate reaction is to think of you as just one more agents provocateur of the Zionist Jew cartel of bullshitters and deceivers out to denigrate and ultimately destroy one of the two main spiritual forces on this planet that have been resisting these vipers for the past two thousand years.

Do you do likewise regarding the Muslims and Mohammed as well?, for it is they too who, at this moment in our collective history, are the main force resisting this onslaught of Zionist megalomania and pathology and the only other major religion that acknowledges the divinity and greatness of the Christ and his Mother Mary.

It took me personally close to sixty years of searching and investigating practically every spiritual path known to man to eventually settle upon one faith or belief system that met the basic prerequisites that I wanted: peace, harmony, brother/sisterhood, gentleness, love, honesty, joyfulness, kindness toward all sentient beings, humbleness and meekness in the face of a Creator whose magnanimity you have yet to realize. You fail, throughout all of your pissing and moaning about the Christians, to recognize that it was Jesus Christ who first stood up to the Pharisaic/Talmudic/Zionist mindset. It was He and those who shared a like consciousness of the holy, who initially exemplified the willingness to resist, as all freedom-fighters resist, the significant and ominous actions of the Sanhedrin even at that nascent point in our collective, historic struggle with the forces of darkness and evil.

It needs to be asked, as in all examples such as this, who ultimately benefits from your malignant and malodorous bad-mouthing, other than those you and your ilk, in all your combined naivety, also profess to be the force to be most reckoned with?

The endless debating over whether or not Jesus Christ “really” existed is not only a useless waste of time and effort but also a ruse, initiated by the very forces you profess to be at odds with. The Christos – whether that state of God consciousness exists in the flesh or not and contrary to all of your simplistic and misinformed rhetoric – is irrelevant. What is relevant is that it symbolizes Love, Truth and Peace and therefore provides those of us who understand this fundamental principle with ample reason to continue on in this seemingly endless struggle to achieve justice and harmony in this world.

May you be blessed with such an understanding some day and then…

Shine your Light for Love, Peace & Justice for All.

Arthur Topham
Publisher/Editor
The Radical Press
Canada’s Radical News Network
“Digging to the root of the issues since 1998″
http://www.radicalpress.com
radical@radicalpress.com
—————————–

It’s Time to Kill Sec. 13

By Arthur Topham
July 23, 2009

It might appear unusual for an old Hippie such as myself to be advocating “killing” things seeing as how I’ve spend the greater portion of my lifetime singing the theme-song of the 60’s: LOVE & PEACE. But, I suppose there comes a time in every person’s life when they are faced with certain decisions which, weighed in their fullness and measured against the alternatives that present themselves, require address. Such is the case with this dreadful and ominous threat to Canada’s collective freedoms of speech and expression now embodied in Section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act.

Over the past couple of years my mind has been immersed in the subject. Having spent decades writing and researching and criticizing the machinations of those who have been conspiring to limit the individual freedoms of people around the world suddenly I was confronted with a new level of reality. Upon receiving word from the Canadian Human Rights Commission that I had been charged with committing the very crime which I’d spent so many years fighting against was, to use yet another expression of the 60s, “mind-blowing” to say the least.

Since then it’s been a steady and steep learning curve for me; one which, thanks to the fact that I can still publish my thoughts and ideas on the net, I have been able to share with people around the world. In that sense it’s been a golden opportunity to share my perspective and the perspectives of others who feel the same way about freedom of speech and the reasons for why we’re now being slammed front and center by the censors; those who obviously believe that silence is golden when it comes to criticism of certain elements of our Establishment who don’t wish to become the focus of any media scrutiny or political analysis.

One thing that has proven true over the past few years, whether the censorship advocates wish to acknowledge it or not, is the fact that increased awareness concerning the root causes of humanity’s overall discontent is growing at an exponential rate thanks to the net. I felt this very strongly when I wrote the little article Killing the 100th Monkey back in January of 2008 outlining the phenomenon. It was happening big time then but in the past year and a half it has increased even further thanks to the actions of those who continually precipitate hatred and violence and terrorism and economic deception upon the defenseless peoples of the world using the guise of various government and international agencies to do so.

For those who, for whatever reasons, haven’t had the time or the inclination to investigate this burgeoning and blossoming of knowledge and information, it remains still a mystery as to why all the assorted confusing, contradictory factors which the mainstream media juggles and dangles before the glazed eyes and minds of the general public are not recognized for what they truly are: deception and subterfuge, not only with an agenda but also with an attitude (big time). This enigma of disparate, deliberate design, which the general populace – who rely upon the mainstream media for their information – is faced with (literally) every day, is being continually countered in the amazing world of the blogosphere or as I prefer to label it, Cyberspace, every minute of the day.

Of course those who don’t wish to see this growing awareness of first causes flourish try their best to denigrate it and label it as merely “anti-Semitic”, “hate-filled”, “racist” propaganda purposely designed to bring opprobrium and contempt upon those to whom all the criticism is being directed. As such they face a formidable challenge. It’s as if all hell had suddenly broke loose for them. It’s Pandora’s Box maxing out on a combination of meth and viagra! It’s the proverbial lesson encompassed in the metaphor of the little Dutch boy trying to hold back the rising flood tide by sticking his finger in the hole of the crumbling dike. In other words it’s revelation time, come hell or high water. The OK Corral in digital format. The Quickening. And for Christians and others of a religious bent it’s the beginning of the End Times. The start of mankind’s Trials and Tribulations as we swiftly ascend either the stairway to Heaven or descend into the valley of Armageddon.

What all of these assorted approaches to today’s political and spiritual events create is a hodge-podge of positions that the censors are faced with having to address whether they wish to or not. And it is creating havoc within their ranks as we see them desperately attempt to address this growing resistance to their censorship methods.

Using what now appear to most serious enquirers as worn-out cliche responses to the mountains of accusations and evidence currently confronting their actions the censors are forced to retreat into their one remaining safety zone – the monolithic government agencies that they surreptitiously created over the past decades to quell the growing, vociferous hordes of rabble who are now realizing they’ve been had big-time by these self-selected arbiters of public policy and basic human rights. High above the ramparts of their Commissions and Tribunals is raised the flag of their dominion and upon it, emblazoned in blood red letters upon a backdrop of the Red Shield, are the words: Section 13(1).

Holding up in their castles of sand and subterfuge and sophistry they’re in disarray and confusion, one hand not fully aware of what the other is doing. Their techniques and strategies are coming apart at the seams as the electronic world upon which they depend betrays their ignoble ends and their illegal, immoral acts. Every turn they make they’re caught doing something they shouldn’t be doing. Every statement they issue is immediately proven to be both transparent and filled with lies and half-truths. They’re beginning to react like caged animals who sense deep within themselves their imminent demise and they’re lashing out haphazardly at anyone who criticizes them. In other words their castle of corruption and deceit is under siege by the cyber-warriors of free speech and with each passing day they become more and more reactive and abusive in their methodology; more sinister and underhanded in their public outcries; more devious and denial-ridden in their overall demeanor. They’ve become, as the graphic image above this article portrays, like some alien, reptilian creature from another dimension of space that’s suddenly manifested before our eyes and its vile and evil intent is now so ever-present as to be beyond question.

The only remaining question is do we as a free and open and democratic society allow this creature to continue to thrash about and destroy more and more lives as it’s purpose becomes recognizable beyond question or do we do the merciful thing and put it out of its misery? The solution is obvious. It’s time to kill section 13 and regain our nation.

—————–

[Editor’s Note: I sincerely recommend going to the website of FreeDominion.com and reading through the following threads dealing with the issues of Section 13, the Human Rights Commissions and the Tribunals. There is also much in the way of discussion surrounding the case of Abrams v. RadicalPress.com that I think many Radical Readers would enjoy.]

Please see:

Censorship by Intimidation - Harry Abrams/Richard Warman
http://www.freedominion.com.pa/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=120930

Harry Abrams joins the FD debate…
http://www.freedominion.com.pa/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=121039&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=0

CHRC: The Be-bopping Railroad
http://www.freedominion.com.pa/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=121063

Topham fails to make hard enough case in Penis Post
http://www.freedominion.com.pa/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=120748

Freedom of Speech defended in Alberta Court
http://www.freedominion.com.pa/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=121136

—————–

Arthur Topham is the Publisher and Editor of RadicalPress.com. He is currently involved in a free speech battle with the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada.

He is also in extremely dire need of financial support to sustain this battle with the forces of repression and censorship as he is not able to work during this period of intense litigation with the Canadian Human Rights Commission and the CHR Tribunal. Any donations therefore would be most welcome. Please see the following url on the Home Page (upper right hand corner) http://www.radicalpress.com/?page_id=657 regarding donations. Also there is a “DONATE” button there for Paypal or here at https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=4466120 . Feel free to use any of them if you can help out. Thanks.

Arthur welcomes all feedback to his articles and can be reached at radical@radicalpress.com .

For the Full Monty on the complaint case involving RadicalPress.com and B’nai Brith Canada please see: http://www.radicalpress.com/?page_id=995

Arthur Topham
Pub/Ed
The Radical Press
Canada’s Radical News Network
4633 Barkerville Hwy
Quesnel, B.C. V2J 6T8
radical@radicalpress.com
http://www.radicalpress.com
“Digging to the root of the issues since 1998”
——————————————————-

Dear Radical Reader,

It’s been awhile since I’ve sent out any of Pastor Eli James’s writings. This article though is one which deserves the utmost attention by anyone concerned about their loss of freedoms whether they’re christian, pagan, atheist, buddhist, muslim, taoist or none of the aforementioned. The message crosses all boundaries and borders and will ring true to anyone who’s been paying attention to global events and the erosion of our cherished rights and freedoms, especially the right to express one’s opinions without fear of the Orwellian thought police busting down your door and hauling you away to some Stalinist Bolshevik “Show Trial.”

Freedom of Speech is the penultimate and quintessential right for without it we become but slaves to the state and to anyone wielding power for control over others.

Pastor Eli James pulls no punches in his heart-felt effort to alert his fellow Americans to the dangers posed by the Zionist Beast that now stalks the planet in search of more and more victims to feed its frenzied appetite for MORE control of our bodies, minds and spirits. His efforts and words apply just as much to Canada and every other nation of the world that’s been infiltrated and had their Constitutions abducted and usurped by this megalomaniacal psychopathic entity that’s out to fulfill its self-chosen agenda of world domination and one world “international” government.

It’s methods are systematic and once realized as predictable as one’s yearly tax notice or the waxing and waning of the moon. It’s greatest tactic of course is to create FEAR in whatever manner that it can, be it 9/11 or Hiroshima or Dresden or the Gulag Archipelago. Tyranny always has feasted upon fear and used fear to enhance the breadth and scope of its menacing and grasping tentacles. It knows how starved the world is for peace and love and it uses the mentally and spiritually emaciated masses and manipulates them via its news agencies into feeling insecure and afraid, for its then that they are most vulnerable to giving up their rights and freedoms.

The forces of Darkness by any other name still reek to high heaven. They do their utmost to force the faithful of any religion to take up arms against those who worship the one God under a different name. They’ve expended millions if not billions of the people’s money and wealth to create wars where innocents are led to sacrifice their lives for principles that ultimately become meaningless when the wars cease and the only winners are the Zionist elite who’ve fomented and feasted upon them and in the end acquired even greater riches and wealth while the blood of innocents soaks the planet and democracy reels and falters from the death blows dealt to it by the greed of a small number of psychopaths.

Everyone has a right to worship God in their own way. There is only one divine Presence, one divine Cosmos, one divine Purpose and that is LOVE AND PEACE AND BROTHERHOOD AND SISTERHOOD and a reverence for this garden given to us by the ONE CREATOR for the use of ALL.

We need to think about these things and start putting the pieces of the puzzle together. Pastor Eli James has done just that with his expose of the Zionist cartel that’s now ruling the world via subterfuge and ill-gained power and wealth.

Without these three cherished Freedoms it’s highly unlikely that we will ever, as a race of human beings, achieve the fourth freedom which Norman Rockwell illustrated so beautifully and aptly in the illustrations that I’m using. The last freedom is freedom from want. Freedom from having to live on the streets, homeless and starving and existing hand to mouth because of a few power-crazed groups who want to rule the resources of the world. Freedom to feed our children and our families and enjoy the fruits of this holy garden we call the Earth Mother.

Like the four directions of the native American spiritual teachers these four freedoms are the pillars that hold up the temple of LIFE. They are now threatened by an alien force. It has to be first recognized and then resisted and stopped. God willing that will happen with the courage and conviction of all who value these four noble truths.

Please pass this article to everyone you can. The fate of freedom depends on each and every one of us doing something to ensure it carries on to our children and grandchildren.

Shine your Light for Love & Peace & Justice for All,

Arthur Topham
Pub/Ed
The Radical Press
——————————————————-

The Articles of Tyranny

by Pastor Eli James

Church of the Restoration of True Israel
http://www.anglo-saxonisrael.com/

See also:

http://www.christogenos.com
http://www.skipbaker.com
http://www.prothink.com

“In my distress I cried unto Yahweh, and He heard me. Deliver my soul, O Yahweh, from lying lips and a deceitful tongue. What shall be given unto thee, or what shall be done unto thee, thou false tongue? Sharp arrows of the mighty, with coals of juniper. Woe is me, that I sojourn in Mesech, that I dwell in the tents of Kedar! My soul hath long dwelt with him that hateth peace. I am for peace: but when I speak, they are for war.” (Psalm 120)

“Beware the leaven of the Pharisees, which is hypocrisy.” (Luke 12:1)

Introduction

This essay is about lying tongues that hate peace. May our Father, Yahweh, grant to His Children, Israel (not to be confused with the Jews), the Great Awakening, which will open their eyes to truth that will set them free.

(more…)

Painting: Iraqi artist, Shakir Al-Alousi.

http://uncensoredarabwomanblues.blogspot.com/
A Barefoot Dance…

By Layla Anwar

Friday, 27 March 2009

You know something ? I love dancing…and am told am a good one too. And ONE of the reasons, I find the current puppet regime in Iraq not only corrupt but borrrrrrrrrrrring is because they have banned dancing places. Dancing is no longer allowed in Baghdad…except in the Green Zone, of course — leisure therapy for the poor worn out brave boys and girls from the Wild West.

I remember the good old days in Baghdad, we could dance…You name it we danced it. No one thought we were “loose” because we danced…and boy did we swing.

And please don’t bore me with your usual leftist crap about “only the bourgeoisie was allowed to dance”. Even the riff raf danced…but today, they channel their energies differently, they kill instead - because the Ayatoilets from Qum declared dancing to be Haram. Dancing is haram but drilling, raping, torturing and murdering people is not.

Sod them, I love dancing — and I have always said it there are two ways I’d like to go - either in bed or on the dance floor.

Okay, I retract - not in bed… that would be quite confusing for the meaningful other, and would very likely trigger off a deep existential angst summed up in one sentence — the fine line between coming and going.

Away from such macabre, morbid thoughts. Damn they follow me everywhere. I wonder why…

Anyways, I was listening to this radio station that plays oldies. I love oldies. Maybe because am getting old myself…kind of a quick maturing…sod them, I don’t care. We’re all getting there…sooner than later.

So I was listening to this station and they played that song - a song that took me back to when I was 4 years old.

I remember my parents taking me on a cruise trip…

I was bored with adults, but being rocked by the sea and waiting for mermaids to appear would fend off my boredom…and there was not much to do for kids on this cruising ship, except dress up in dentelle and sit on high cushions, otherwise I could not reach my fork and knife, keep my elbows off the table and wait for dinner to be served…I can’t remember the food, it must have been very bland.

But there is one thing I will never forget from that trip - a memory that vividly comes back to me when I hear that song…

Dad tucked me in bed and said :

- Layla - don’t you move and you go to sleep now”
- Yes daddy.
- Yalla good night my good girl.
- Yes daddy.

Could not sleep…

(more…)

THE 1st EDITION OF THE RADICAL CAME OUT JUNE, 1998. IT’S HEADLINES NOW STAND AS A FOREWARNING OF THE STRUGGLES THAT LAY AHEAD WITH THE SUBVERSIVE FORCES OF TYRANNY EMBEDDED IN CANADA’S GOVERNMENT, JUDICIARY, MEDIA AND INSTITUTIONS

______________________________________________________________________________

Dear Free Speech lovers,

As you can see from the headlines of the First Edition of The Radical of June, 1998 the prime objective of The Radical Press was to ensure that Canadians would not end up living under a tyrannical government that used censorship to silence important debates of any nature be they political, religious, philosophical, or otherwise.

Whether that original headline was a prophetic warning of things to come or not waits to be seen still. Judging from the events of the last few years it appears that the forces of repression and censorship in this nation are bound and determined to do their best to turn Canada into another Orwellian police state where freedom of speech becomes a thing of the past.

As we’ve seen just recently with the Harper government’s shameful kowtowing to the Canadian Jewish Defense League and their  banishing of British MP George Galloway from entering Canada, the writing is definitely on the wall! Now is the time for concerned citizens everywhere to speak out and let our politicians know, in no uncertain terms, that such behavior on the part of our elected representatives is NOT ACCEPTABLE IN THIS FREE NATION!

The Zionist forces hiding within these lobbyist groups like B’nai Brith Canada, the Canadian Jewish Congress and this newcomer on the block, the Jewish Defense League, are all working in the interests of foreign governments rather than the people of Canada and our right to free expression.

Since I first put out a plea on the net March 2, 2009 for letters of support in my battle with Zionist B’nai Brith Canada the response has been phenomenal and positive. From notable and busy activists such as Jeff Rense, David Icke, and Canadian website owner Connie Fournier of www.freedominion.ca to people across Canada, the USA and the world, encouraging messages of support for freedom of speech on the Internet are growing stronger by the day.

As only a couple of days remain before I must send all these letters to the Tribunal as part of the upcoming hearing process I’m enclosing some examples received thus far by individuals who, regardless of their extremely busy schedules or place of residence, have taken the time to lend their support to this important complaint case by the CHRC and Tribunal.

Please read them or at least scan through them. Hopefully you will be moved to also express your thoughts on this issue. In more ways than one time is running out and please don’t misconstrue that statement as mere scare tactics on my part.
Anyone wishing to see the form letter that can help you with the basics of the case please go to the following url at RadicalPress.com. http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=937

Also I must put in a plug for financial help from those willing and able. Please see  http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=930    for details.

Please pass this message along if you can. Thanks.

PS. Due to time constrains I’m not going to make links of all the email addresses contained in the letters. If you wish to contact any of the writers merely copy and paste their address from the article.

Shine your Light for Love & Peace & Justice for All,

Arthur Topham
Pub/Ed
The Radical Press

——————————————————-

LETTERS OF SUPPORT FOR RADICALPRESS.COM

#93

Shastah Topham
shastatopham@yahoo.com

Nancy Lafontant
Registry Officer
Canadian Human Rights Tribunal
Nancy.Lafontant@chrt-tcdp.gc.ca

Date: March 25th 2009

Nancy Lafontant,

RE: File Number: T1360/9008

The complaint case by the Canadian Human Rights Commission involving Arthur Topham and his website RadicalPress.com and Harry Abrams and the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada is one which deeply concerns me.

Arthur Topham and I have been married for over thirty years. My Jewish heritage has never been an issue in our life together - in fact quite the opposite. He often mentioned he knew he would marry a Jewish woman.

I feel that it is of paramount importance for the tribunal to distinguish the difference between “anti-Semitism” and “anti-Zionism”. They are not one and the same concept.

Anti-Semitism bespeaks of racism and hatred towards Jews. My husband Arthur Topham has never demonstrated behaviors of racism or hatred toward myself, or any person, group, or religion.

Political Zionism, on the other hand, is a practice which is not remotely connected to religion or God. It is more of a philosophy or ideology based on astronomical greed, corruption, power and control.

The book, “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion” clearly indicates the ideology and concepts of what Zionism is based on. I suggest that each and every person within the CHR Commission and the CHR Tribunal read “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion” to educate themselves on the true nature of Political Zionism.

My husband Arthur Topham, in his quest to expose Political Zionism and educate the world, is uncovering a massive Zionist secret nest of lies and deceit, the origin of which goes back well beyond the Twentieth Century.

Any attempts to muzzle the truths that Arthur Topham is bringing forward to the public would be silencing his God given right to free speech. All people who sit on the CHRC and CHRT are cognizant of this truth, and must therefore decide which master they will serve – SATANIC ideology – or the GOD of TRUTH, INTEGRITY and LOVE.

Mrs. Shastah Topham
Cottonwood, B.C.

#86

Nancy Lafontant
Registry Officer
Canadian Human Rights Tribunal
Nancy.Lafontant@chrt-tcdp.gc.ca

March 20, 2009

Dear Nancy Lafontant,

RE: File Number: T1360/9008

The complaint case by the Canadian Human Rights Commission involving Arthur Topham and his website RadicalPress.com and Harry Abrams and the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada is not only of extreme importance to citizens of Canada but also to the people of the United States of America.

I am an American citizen and the owner of a major alternative News Network (www.rense.com) and the host-producer of my own nationally-syndicated Talk Radio Program (for 15 years) here in the U.S.

Like Canada’s notorious Sec. 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act, our US House Judiciary is also currently facing two pending federal ‘hate’ crime bills-HR 256 and 262.

These ‘hate crimes’ bills - introduced by special interest groups not unlike those in Canada now attempting to destroy Mr. Topham and his website - pose a direct threat to the First Amendment to our US Constitution; and like Sec. 13 of your CHR Act, ought to have no place in any of our respective nations’ law books.  All human beings have a God-given birthright to their own opinions and thoughts.  There is no such thing as ‘partial’ or ‘restricted’ free speech just as there is no way to be partially pregnant.  We either have full, unfettered Freedom of Speech, or we have none.

I am adamant in my feeling that the VAST majority of Canadians, just like Americans, do not want or need ANY anti-free speech laws…and all efforts in that regard should be taken to rid your nation of them.

It is my position that censorship of ideas and opinions of people anywhere has no place in the media nor on the Internet in a free world.

On behalf of Arthur Topham and RadicalPress.com, I would ask that you give serious attention to eliminating these draconian laws from your Canadian Human Rights Act and allow Freedom of Speech to resume its rightful place in all forms of debate.

Sincerely,

Jeff Rense
sightings@mindspring.com

#88

Nancy Lafontant
Registry Officer
Canadian Human Rights Tribunal
Nancy.Lafontant@chrt-tcdp.gc.ca

March 22, 2009

Dear Nancy Lafontant,

RE: File Number: T1360/9008

The complaint case brought against Arthur Topham and his website RadicalPress.com by the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada via the Canadian Human Rights Commission is not only of utmost importance to all Canadians who wish to express themselves on the Internet freely but to people everywhere who value this basic human right.

As a British citizen and the owner/operator of one of the world’s largest alternative websites ( www.davidicke.com ) I find it outrageous that such injustice is now being perpetrated upon Arthur Topham and his website.

Like Mr. Topham I also have also been attacked by the likes of former CHRC Investigator and serial litigator Richard Warman, who takes the term ‘thin skin’ to new levels of meaning. As a result, I have been accused of similar ludicrous “hate crimes” when I could not be racist if my life depended on it. So I understand the nature of this charge against Topham and his website.

Canada’s notorious and discredited Sec. 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act, was designed by special interest groups such as the Canadian Jewish Congress, B’nai Brith Canada and others and then inserted into the CHR Act to be used against other individual Canadians and groups who, according to Canada’s Bill of Rights and its Charter of Rights and Freedoms as well as the International Right under the Charter of Rights of the United Nations, nonetheless retain the legal, and most basic, human right to express their opinions and those of others on their websites or in their public writings.

This problem of Zionist lobby groups attempting to subvert the constitutional rights of free speech in so-called free nations around the world is becoming more and more obvious and vast numbers of people who once dismissed such claims as ‘racist’ are now seeing this blatant fact. The example of your federal government banning an elected British MP, George Galloway, from entering Canada is just the most recent and graphic example of what I’m talking about.

On behalf of Arthur Topham and RadicalPress.com, and all freedom-supporting Canadians who oppose such actions by lobbyists for foreign nations, I would suggest you give serious attention to eliminating these draconian laws from your Canadian Human Rights Act and allow the fundamental and crucial right to freedom of speech to resume its rightful place in all forms of debate.

After all, your own children and grandchildren will also have to live in the Orwellian world you are helping to create. Will they thank-you for it? Or be disgusted?

Sincerely,

David Icke
8 Vernon House,
20 Wood Street,
Ryde,
Isle of Wight
United Kingdom
PO33 2JR

BOOKRES@aol.com

#87

Nancy Lafontant
Registry Officer
Canadian Human Rights Tribunal
Nancy.Lafontant@chrt-tcdp.gc.ca

March 20, 2009

Dear Nancy Lafontant,

RE: File Number: T1360/9008

I am writing on behalf of Arthur Topham from the Radical Press.

Mr. Topham is the respondent in a Section 13 complaint by Mr. Harry Abrams.

Although Arthur Topham has political opinions that differ vastly from my own, I think it is important that he is allowed to express them, and I am deeply disgusted that the CHRC is still busily trying to censor Canadian citizens.

The CHRC has come under intense scrutiny over the past year, and this whole process has been discredited.  It really is time that they stopped trying to police the online speech of Canadians and started doing something useful, like protecting human rights instead of stomping on them.

When this case goes to a Tribunal, I guarantee that it will be covered extensively in the online media, and that the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal will not have another opportunity to conduct their business in the dark and, in the words of Richard Warman, “continue their tradition” of issuing lifetime Cease and Desist Orders to every respondent.

Mr. Topham will not be fighting this fight alone.  Those days are over.

Sincerely,

Connie Fournier
Free Dominion
Connie Fournier connie@freedominion.ca

#85

Nancy Lafontant
Registry Officer
Canadian Human Rights Tribunal
Nancy.Lafontant@chrt-tcdp.gc.ca

March 19, 2009

Ms Lafontant;

RE: File Number: T1360/9008

I’m writing to you today to express my concerns over a case currently before your tribunal; Harry Abrams and the B’nai Brith vs. Arthur Topham and his website radicalpress.com.

Right off the bat I’m going to tell you that I think Topham’s ideas, in regards to Jews, are repulsive.  I find them inaccurate and ill-informed.  That said, however, I also have a very strong belief that as a free individual in what is supposed to be a free country, Topham has the right to express those ideas unhindered by the state.  As a person who believes very strongly in the fundamental right of ALL Canadians to be able to express their opinions without fear, I wish to register my dissatisfaction with the fact that special lobby groups and thin skinned serial complainers are attempting to use the Canadian Human Rights Act and Sec. 13(1) to stop their fellow Canadians from expressing their opinions and beliefs.

Arthur Topham is before your Tribunal where he’s charged with the crime of committing “hate speech”.  More specifically, as indicated by Harry Abrams in his complaint, and while Abrams was gloating on the Western Standard blog ( http://www.no-libs.com/files/w_s_abrams.htm ), Topham is being persecuted for making available, a copy of the “Protocols Of The Elders Of Zion”, a document that is freely available on the internet.  I myself have made that document available on my website, along with 2 other documents that Harry Abrams will surely find offensive; the Quran http://no-libs.com/media/docs/Quran.pdf and Mein Kampf http://no-libs.com/media/docs/meinkampf.pdf .

If Harry Abrams and your tribunal are to continue with your persecution of Arthur Topham, you’ll have to stand me alongside him as I’ve committed the exact same “crime”.

My name is Richard Evans and you know where to find me.

Richard Evans
richard@no-libs.com

#79

Nancy Lafontant
Registry Officer
Canadian Human Rights Tribunal
Nancy.Lafontant@chrt-tcdp.gc.ca

Date: March 16, 2009

Dear Nancy Lafontant,

RE: File Number: T1360/9008

I have known Arthur Topham as editor of Radical Press for approximately 15 years and he has always expressed his opinions openly without prejudice and he has no expectations of persuasion or transference on behalf of the reader. He often expresses radical assumptions and provides interesting conjecture through his editorials. His aptly named former newspaper and website “Radical Press” should indicate to any free thinking intelligent individual the challenging level of his discourse.

As a person who believes very strongly in the fundamental right of ALL Canadians to be able to express their opinions and views without fear of legal repercussions I wish to register my dissatisfaction with the fact that special lobby groups in Canada are attempting to use the Canadian Human Rights Act and Sec. 13(1) to stop their fellow Canadians from expressing their opinions and beliefs on matters of importance to Canada.

I strongly feel that a person’s right to speak their mind in an open, civil and truthful manner on political, social and religious issues of the day is crucial to an understanding of how our society and the world at large works and that a person’s viewpoint should not be censored merely because it disagrees with either the status quo or the position of another interest group with differing political views.

Judging from how this Sec. 13(1) of the Canadian Human Rights Act has been used to unfairly penalize free expression in Canada I believe that this legislation should be removed from the CHR Act and that issue of “hate crimes” should be dealt with as in the Criminal Code of Canada where a person thus charged has the right to a fair trial in a court of law with either a Judge or a Judge and Jury.

Thank you,

Denis Walsh,
City Councillor, Kamloops.
520A Seymour St.,
Kamloops, BC
denis@telus.net

#84

March 18, 2009

Nancy Lafontant
Registry Officer
Canadian Human Rights Tribunal
Nancy.Lafontant@chrt-tcdp.gc.ca

Dear Ms Lafontant,

RE: File Number: T1360/9008 (B’nai B’rith Canada vs. RadicalPress.com)

I am writing in connection to the complaint made against Mr. Arthur Topham and The Radical that is now before the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal.  In this case, the complaint appears to have been brought by the B’nai B’rith in regard to Mr. Topham’s writings on Israel and Zionism.  A recent case against columnist Mark Steyn was made by another special interest group alleging that Mr. Steyn had instigated hatred against Muslims.

As a person of Jewish heritage, I find much of what Mr. Topham writes about these topics difficult to read, occasionally overstated, and sometimes (in my view) simply wrong.  By the same token, I find Mr. Steyn’s commentary about Islam and Muslims often misguided.  Both of these journalists, however, are also often thought provoking and insightful.  Regardless of how one views such writings, whether they match the world/political/social perspectives of others, the freedom to express opinions publicly without the fear of legal repercussions for doing so is a fundamental civil right of all Canadians.

Certainly, there are those who would find any criticism of a particular group or ideology offensive, yet it is not the place of such self-appointed guardians to protect me or my fellow citizens from opinions that may not match our own.  The hallmark of a free society is the right to hold contrary opinions and to express them in public.  For this reason, any attempt to censor so called hateful ideas by the use of the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal has no place in such a society.  Commentary that poses real risks to the lives of others can easily be dealt with by means of the Criminal Code of Canada. Using Sec. 13(1) of the Canadian Human Rights Act to accomplish the work of the Criminal Code is a blatant misuse of the laws of the land.  It is also, I suggest, a certain path to political tyranny of the majority to censor ideas and their expression.

Sincerely yours,

C.A. Shaw, Ph.D
1706 Deep Cove Road
North Vancouver, B.C.
V7G 1S5 Canada
Email: cashawlab@gmail.com

Christopher A. Shaw, Ph.D
Professor
Dept. of Ophthalmology
University of British Columbia
828 W. 10th Ave, Vancouver, BC,
V5Z 1L8
tel: 604-875-4111 (68373)

(more…)

Painting of Mary & Christ Child by a Controversial German artist 1913

______________________________________________

An Open Letter to All Christian Zionists

By Lifeforce

March 10, 2009

Dear Susan:

I have been very slow in responding to your email because I fear that I have provoked you with my commentary about the Zionist control of our government.  That was not my intention.  And if you feel threatened I regret that very much.  My purpose was to warn you.   If you are not aware, you cannot possibly protect yourself from the threat that Zionism poses for all of us.  And things are going to get a lot worse before they get better..

In your message you question my religious convictions.  If you notice in my message,  I never discussed the religious ramifications of this problem. I never once used the term “Jew.”  There is a very good reason for that. Zionism at its core is not about religion.  It is about politics, power and ultimately it is about the struggle for world domination. The conflict between the Arabs and the Israelis is not a religious conflict.  It is a political struggle for the control of the middle east.  Unlike our people, the people of the middle east understand this very well.   But you seem to want to reduce this discourse to the level of religion.   Discussing religion is something I generally avoid, because it is a dead end.  A no win proposition.  But since we apparently cannot escape that notion I will share with you some of my views.    I consider my personal spirituality far more important than man’s organized religion.  Millions have died because of man’s ability and willingness to distort the teachings of the great spiritual masters.  That is true now more  than ever.  Let’s just say that I love God, and I love God’s divine plan more than you can ever know.   I do believe in, and try very hard to FOLLOW,  the teachings of Christ.   I consider him to be the greatest savant and spiritual leader in world history.  Christ taught the world unconditional love, mercy, compassion and forgiveness for everyone —- including your enemies.  He lived and died by that mantra.  When he was being crucified he forgave his murderers. That seems to be the part that Christians have the hardest time remembering. Don’t you think it is  time to start?   In contrast to Christianity the Zionists have a saying:  “Never forgive, and never forget.”  And they don’t.  God’s chosen people?  That said, do you honestly believe that Jesus Christ would approve of what some of the so-called Christian churches are doing—with respect to their support of Zionism and Israel?  Do you think Christ would support the Zionists as they murder innocent Palestinian children.  I don’t think so.   The IDF deliberately targeted toddlers and small children in their latest genocidal attack on the Palestinians.  They consider it a sport to shoot children.  “Only head shots count.” Hundreds of children were shot by Israeli snipers.  When they lay dead they mutilated the bodies by using them for target practice.  One little girl had eighteen bullet holes in her body and her two year old sister, who she was carrying at the time of her death, was shot twelve times.    Do you think this is the kind of behavior that would be practiced by people who are God’s chosen?  I don’t think so.  That kind of behavior is not just evil, it is satanic.

(more…)

Dedicated to all who value the truth, free speech and are willing to sacrifice themselves on the “Highway of Public Controversy”

Hi Everyone, 

We are very excited to launch this Hard-Hitting, Pro-Family, Pro-Truth Radio show.

Please help us to make it a hit by forwarding this email to your list and then making a date with us tonight on RoadKill Radio!!!  It’s going to be fun and ohhhh so very needed!!!

With great appreciation for all you do!

Kind Regards,

Kari Simpson

————–

YES TODAY!!!!!!

RoadKill Radio Launches Online!!!!!

And You Are Invited!!

Hosts Kari Simpson & Terry O’Neill

Unabashedly Canadian, BOLD with No Apologies and oh yes, one more thing - we are pleased and determined to ensure those “Politically-Incorrect” voices that have been silenced are given an opportunity to be part of the debate and to have your voices heard!!

WHERE:         Listen live -     http://WWW.ROADKILLRADIO.COM

WHEN:          TODAY!!!  Tuesday March 3, 2009 @ 7:30 – 9:30 pm (PST)

CALL IN:        On-air telephone:      (604) 525-4167

EMAIL US:     roadkillradio@live.ca

TOPICS:

– The naughty Pro-Lifers who dared to exercise their right to free speech and have now been charged by the  University of Calgary with trespassing!

–  Polygamy, do we need to say more?….YES!

–  Gay Politics 101 and other Social Injustices – The Corren Agreement

http://incogman.wordpress.com/2009/02/16/whats-the-big-deal-about-the-holocaust/
What’s the Big Deal about the Holocaust?

February 16, 2009

WARNING: Reading this blog article and thinking about the issues covered may force you to completely reevaluate the real deal going on America’s head today. You may not want to take the red pill, Neo!

All over the place nowadays, people are asking questions about the Holocaust and wondering why this subject is still so controversial after all this time. What is it now, 64 years? People are too scared to voice any doubts, since they’ve been programmed to think that anyone who does so must be evil and anti-Semitic. But when you think about it, sentiments like that should be quite separate from historical facts and never, ever subject to legal efforts.

So, why is the Holocaust such a big deal? Because it’s a major leg propping up the New World Order and the people behind the curtain — no doubt about it. They know that if you start asking questions about any of this, soon it will lead to a whole helluva lot more. And it’s so easy to see all the reasons (below), that they’ve pushed this version of history on America and the White countries of the West — all the while knowing how much outrage the public would have for being lied to.

Recently, a Catholic Bishop in Argentina came out during a interview and said it was 200,000 to 300,000 Jews who died in the camps and none in a gas chamber. Bishop Richard Williamson ignited a bit of firestorm over his statements and was even briefly mentioned on the mainstream news.

Bishop Richard Williamson

Jew Thought Police, like the ADL’s Abe Foxman went haywire about it, demanded and had the spineless Vatican denounce his comments and remove him from the pulpit. World Jewish leaders then told the Vatican that “Holocaust denial is not an opinion, but a crime.” Jews ordered them to declare Holocaust denial as “heresy” and undergo Holocaust education.

Such is the arrogance of International Jewry and Big Zionism today. The Jews have always had it in for the Catholic church. They completely demonized and demoralized the church with non-stop press coverage of the Gay pedophile priests, still going strong today. Funny, how the press never breathes a word about all the rabbis who have been caught doing this kind of thing.

Another thing you won’t hear about in the mainstream media is that the Jews in Europe now want the Bishop literally arrested and thrown in the slammer. That’s right: By questioning anything about the sacred Holocaust can earn you a prison term in 11 countries in Europe and Canada. This should be completely unacceptable to any free thinking White person!

People like Ernst Zündel now sit in prison over what they’ve said in public (letters of support have even been kept from reaching him); Dr. Fredrik Töban from Australia came close to going to jail in Germany, simply for making an airport connection in Britain where Bobbies arrested him for the Germans, but brave free speech advocates soon came to his rescue and the government finally released him. Simon Shepard and Stephen Whittle, who created the fascinating site The Heretical Press, are now in jail by the British thought crime police after trying to flee to America for their political beliefs.

David Irving, once a highly respected WWII historian (he blew wide open the Hitler Diary forgery), had spent a decade in the German archives researching the war and then ended up spending 3 years in a Austrian Jail for what he dared say in print about the Holocaust evidence.

Let’s keep one thing perfectly clear about the topic: Holocaust “revisionism” does NOT say the Nazis didn’t kill Jews or anyone else for that matter. How many? Probably a lot. But so did the Soviets kill a lot of Whites (below). And the US and Britain killed over 600,000 White civilians in horrific bombing campaigns against the German cities. 3 Million Germans starved to death after the war, many of them POW’s penned up in American General Dwight Eisenhower’s open-air camps, exposed to the elements and fed almost nothing until they died.

Jew-killers

What they don’t want you to know: Millions of Whites were starved to death (1) and executed by Commies in the “Holmador” under the direction of Jews like Lazar Kaganovich (2). Far, far more White Gentiles suffered at the hands of Commie Jews than whatever the Nazis ever did. (3) Stalin’s chief propagandist, the Jew Ilya Ehrenburg exhorted Soviet troops to rape and murder the women and children of Germany (4). His deviously imaginative anti-Nazi propaganda and genocide lies were later regurgitated by Globalist Zionists and regular Jewry on the naïve White countries of the West.

This guy lived through it.

Will you or your children?

The Bolsheviks and later, the Soviet Communists, killed millions of White Gentiles. In 1957, the Soviets admitted that 15 to 25 million were executed or starved to death since the Red revolution. But Alexandr Solzhenitsyn (right), in his book “The Gulag Archipelago,” using the research of I. A. Kurganov who had access to a secret government file, estimated it was 66 million who were killed. Jews were predominate in the secret police, like the NKVD and Cheka; in fact, the 6 leading administrators of Stalin’s death apparatus, Aron Solts, Yakov Rappoport, Lazar Kogan, Matvei Berman, Genrikh Yagoda and Naftaly Frenkel were all Jews.

(more…)

[Editor’s Note: While I am not in agreement with what Henry states concerning “Lucifer” in his article below that is another matter for discussion in another place. His connection of current events to the Protocols of Zionism (as I prefer to call them) are excellent and worthy of reading.]

—————
http://www.henrymakow.com/fighting_an_invisible_force.html

Fighting an “Invisible Force”

January 31, 2009

by Henry Makow Ph.D.

“Who and what is in a position to overthrow an invisible force? And this is precisely what our force is.”  (Protocols of Zion, IV)

Roger, an “angry American,” “patriot” and  “fighter,” writes that he is in touch with many men who want to do something but don’t know what. Do I have any ideas?

Roger is like the man who asked how much does the yacht cost and was told, “If you have to ask, you can’t afford it.”

Individuals must take the initiative. That’s what the enemy is most afraid of.

“There is nothing more dangerous than personal initiative if it has genius behind it. We must so direct the education of communities of the goyim that whenever they come upon a matter requiring personal initiative they may drop their hands in despair.” (Protocols of Zion V.)

We must learn to think and act as individuals again. People only do what they “own” i.e. conceive themselves (unless they are paid or propagandized by paid agents.)

(more…)

 RadicalPress.com Editor and Publisher Arthur Topham’s Preliminary Comments:

Greetings Reader:  The information contained in the article below, which is actually my response to the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal’s “offer” to participate in a mediation process with Harry Abrams and the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada, is of vital concern to all Canadians who take the issue of Internet Censorship seriously. As such I would strongly suggest that you do your utmost to assist me in moving this story/letter about the net in the most expedient manner possible. The next, and final stage of this Bolshevik Show Trial will be a “hearing” by the CHR Tribunal which will take place within a month or two and likely conclude with a decision to try and shut down my website RadicalPress.com . Your help would be greatly appreciated.

Arthur Topham

Pub/Ed

RadicalPress.com

———————-
B’nai Brith v. RadicalPress.com: Zionism’s Battle for Control of Canada’s Mind

by Arthur Topham
January 28, 2009

Preface:

The following letter is a reply sent to Nancy Lafontant, Registry Officer and Gregory M. Smith, Registrar of the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal, a quasi-judicial federal agency  now in the process of preparing for a Tribunal hearing regarding the complaint to the Canadian Human Rights Commission by Harry Abrams and The League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada against RadicalPress.com.

The reply contains the argument put forth by RadicalPress.com owner and publisher Arthur Topham that this is a case of an intentional attack upon one of the last remaining alternative news network in Canada – one willing to stand up to the Zionist-controlled media and the assorted Zionist Jewish lobby groups that hold way too much influence over Canada’s Judiciaries and governments, both federally and provincially.

The means being employed by B’nai Brith Canada is the infamous anti-hate law contained in the Canadian Human Rights Act and known as Sec. 13(1).

The RadicalPress.com publisher maintains that the Tribunal’s offer to “mediate” is but a meaningless formality due to the fact than never in the history of the CHRC or the CHRT has a case been won by any of the numerous respondents who have been entrapped by this vile legal trap, one that NEVER allows the Truth to get in its way. NOT UNLESS OF COURSE YOU HAPPEN TO BE JEWISH AND PRO-ZIONIST!

The letter outlines much of the efforts by other victims of this Bolshevik bit of legislation as well as attempts by sane people across Canada to convince the federal government to toss this specious piece of pro-Zionist handiwork into the trash bin of history and at the same time dismantle all the Human Rights Commissions across Canada, be they provincial or federal. The dangers inherent in such quasi-judicial bodies has now become only too obvious at this stage of the game. [A.T.]

————————-
B’nai Brith v. RadicalPress.com: Zionism’s Battle for Control of Canada’s Mind

by Arthur Topham

January 28, 2009

To:
Nancy Lafontant
Registry Officer
And
Gregory M. Smith
Registrar

Registry Officer / Agent du greffe
Canadian Human Rights Tribunal / Tribunal canadien des droits de la personne

Ottawa, ON K1A 1J4/ Ottawa (Ontario) K1A 1J4
nancy.lafontant@chrt-tcdp.gc.ca
Telephone | Téléphone 613-947-1137
Facsimile | Télécopieur 613-995-3484
Teletypewriter | Téléimprimeur 613-563-6460
Government of Canada | Gouvernement du Canada

From:

Arthur Topham
Publisher/Editor
The Radical Press
4633 Barkerville Highway
Quesnel, B.C. V2J 6T8

January 28, 2009.

Dear Ms. Nancy Lafontant and Gregory M. Smith:

RE: Your Tribunal email letter of January 14, 2009 regarding,
Tribunal – Harry Abrams and The League for Human Rights of B’Nai Brith Canada v. Arthur Topham and RadicalPress.com
Your File: T1360/9008

Since receiving your email letter of January 14, 2009 I have given much serious thought and consideration to your “offer” of mediation in the complaint filed by Mr. Harry Abrams and The League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada against my person and my website http://www.radicalpress.com .

Contained in this somewhat lengthy reply you will find my response. Please bear in mind that what is written is done so in a spirit of honest, frank, open-minded and loving intent; designed to address and ultimately resolve in an abbreviated synopsis, the overall issue that is presently at stake in this case. Therefore, no remarks or comments of mine, regardless of their apparent harshness or levity are intended to offend, malign or denigrate any of the parties concerned, which includes the Tribunal and its members.

With respect to the entrapment legislation (which is how I interpret Sec. 13(1) of the CHR Act), whether or not there ever existed or does exist a case of its nature, wherein mediation has benefited the “Respondent” at no cost to their principles, beliefs, integrity or rights I am unaware of it. Perhaps the recent one involving Harry Abrams and The League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada v. Al Rycroft and www.PEJ.org (one set in tandem and paralleling my own) is an exception to this general rule but, not being privy to the details of said case as to whether or not any self-censorship was involved, I cannot make any definitive statement on it one way or another. I do know though that it was initiated by the same parties who have conjoined to bring about the complaint against myself and my website and that in the case of www.PEJ.org it was settled in favour of the respondent but what effect that case will have or has had upon the issue of the ultimate illegality of this specious Section of the Canadian Human Rights Act remains to be seen. It is one case shrouded in almost complete secrecy since the complaint was first laid.

What I am privy to though and acutely cognizant of, is the ultimate nature of this particular complaint and its intended purpose which, I contend, has nothing to do with the issue of “Hate” or “anti-Semitism” or “Racism” or any of the other carefully crafted, misleading phrases and loaded terminology used by both the complainants and, tragically, your own departments within the Canadian Human Rights Commission (CHRC) and the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal (CHRT).

Obviously this issue deals with the primary, fundamental, God-given right, as contained within Canada’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms and elsewhere, to freedom of thought and speech as well as freedom of the media to publish whatever is deemed relevant as either news or views; barring of course all which currently falls within the legal parameters of Canada’s Libel laws and those whose related purpose is to prevent acts of malicious violence toward an individual or group and/or seditious acts against the government of Canada and its sovereign citizens.

As I have previously stated, both in my original Response to the CHRC Investigating officer ( http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=629 January 3, 2008 ) and in my Comments on the CHRC final Report ( see: http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=786 Sept 17/08 ), this is not a simple case of a person of “Jewish faith” being personally maligned or threatened or libeled. Nor is a mundane example of some benign, benevolent society within the ranks of Canada’s multi-cultural social milieu being unduly criticized or picked on for spiteful or vexatious reasons. It is much more complex and convoluted and important, relatively speaking.

It has always been the contention of RadicalPress.com and myself, well before this case arose, that the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada is today a strongly political and vociferous pro-Zionist arm of the Mossad, the designated name for Israel’s unofficial spy network. As such its direct and full complicity with the state of Israel in their covert operations abroad and in its capacity as one of Israel’s most powerful lobby groups here in Canada, makes it de facto, an organization whose operations, both within Canada and without, are justifiably suspect and deserving of the most extreme scrutiny by the media, alternative or otherwise. I needn’t at this point go into any great detail surrounding the influence of this political lobbyist group here in Canada and its subsequent negative effect upon successive federal governments as per Canada’s role in supporting the racist, apartheid policies of the state of Israel.

(more…)

The Jewish Religion: Its Influence Today
by Elizabeth Dilling
Ch. VIII.
DEMONOLOGY OF THE PHARISEES

So-called “Judaism” is nothing but Babylonian Talmudic Pharisaism, which at base is crass paganism concocted through the centuries. Descriptions concocted for this very old satanism, such as “immanence” (Spinoza) “emanation” (Talmudic Cabala), “dialectical materialism” (Marx) merely dress up old pagan concepts….

All forms of demonology were adopted by the Pharisees and incorporated into so-called Judaism. Demons of the privy, of the night, of every phase of nature, were and are catered to by the tenets and customs of this sect. The Talmud book of Yadayim (hands) is, for example, on ritual hand-washing in connection with Pharisee demonology. The Talmud is larded with occult works and practices.

The Pharisee custom in Christ’s time of drizzling water alternately on the hands, to carry off demons (who presumably live in water) is still in force. The “Code of Jewish Law” (Schulchan Aruch), which is a digested “Mishna” of the Talmud, holds that an evil spirit takes over a sleeping person:

“When he rises from his sleep the evil spirit departs from his entire body excepting from his fingers. From there the unclean spirit does not depart unless he spills water on them three times alternately. One is not permitted to walk four cubits without having his hands washed.” (Schulchan Aruch, Vol. 1, Chapter II: Hebrew Publishing Co. 77-9 Delancey St., New York, copyright 1927).

Says the Soncino Edition of the Talmud, in the Introduction to Yadayim (handwashing):

“This … rite … formed one of the chief breaches between Jesus and the Pharisees.” (page 545) When the Pharisees came to Christ, baiting Him about His Apostles not doing these handwashing rituals, He came back at them, saying that they were hypocrites, “teaching for doctrines the commandments of men … Full well ye reject the commandment of God that ye may keep your own tradition.” (See Matthew 15)

Other practices are condoned in Judaism

(more…)

“The Talmudists” 1934 by Max Weber
___________________________________________

[Editor’s Note: Elizabeth Dilling, all things considered, was a prophetess in her own time. Her various works, which include her exposure of the Zionist Jewish infiltration of the United States of America and her analysis of Bolshevism, Communism and Zionism as one Beast with numerous names, are a testament to her courage and her foresight in revealing the truth during a period of American history when to speak out was to risk the inevitable attacks by the Jewish establishment. Groups like the American Jewish Congress and B’nai Brith International and their attack-dog the Anti-Defamation League, were always ready and willing to vilify anyone who dared to speak out about their plans to implement their one world government and Elizabeth Dilling was forced to deal with their Talmudic tactics from the moment she picked up the sword of truth.

Each chapter of her book is preceded by the Forward and an Introduction. Readers who go beyond Chapter One will find it convenient to just scroll down the page until the start of the new chapter.]

—————

Foreword

Elizabeth Dilling Stokes was born, raised, and educated in Chicago. After attending the University of Chicago she married, and for many years devoted her life to her children, social activities on the North Shore of Chicago, and being a concert harpist. After hearing of the great “humanitarian experiment” in Soviet Russia, she traveled there in 1931, and was able to go behind the scenes. She was shocked at the forced labor, the squalid living quarters, and deplorable living conditions, and the atmosphere of fear created by the Soviet dictatorship.

She was most shocked by the virulent anti-Christianity of the atheist Communist regime.

Following her return to the United States she lectured and wrote about what she had seen, realizing from the opposition which immediately arose that a substantial Marxist movement was active in the United States.  In 1934 her first book The Red Network was published, an expose of the persons and organizations furthering Red causes in the United States.   In 1936, her second book, The Roosevelt Red Record and Its Background, was published.
Almost immediately after these books were published, she was attacked as “anti-semitic,” although she had actually offered her anti-Communist services to Jewish organizations, and knew nothing of organized Jewish involvement in the Marxist movement.  After researching and studying, however, in 1940 she published her third book The Octopus, which dealt with these subjects.

After World War II commenced, Mrs. Dilling became convinced that, despite President Roosevelt’s protestations that not one American boy would ever again fight on foreign soil, there was a movement afoot to involve the United States, with the result that a substantial part of the world would be communized later.

In 1941, she led a Mother’s March on Washington to oppose the “Lend Lease” bill, proclaimed to help keep us out of war by its sponsors, but proving the last step for our involvement.  The bill passed by only one vote.  A few months later, the United States went to war.

In 1944, Mrs. Dilling’s views involved her in the now infamous mass “sedition” trial.  The case was ultimately dismissed  by a Federal Court as “a travesty on justice.”

She was later remarried to Jeremiah Stokes, a Christian anti-Communist writer, and she continued to write and lecture in behalf of Christianity and Constitutional Americanism, first publishing this book in 1964.

(more…)

http://catholicinsight.com/online/christianjewish/article_219.shtml
Israel Shahak (1933-2001): A prophetic voice stilled
By Allan C. Brownfeld

March 2003

[RadicalPress Editor’s Note: The following article on Israel Shahak is, I feel, extremely pertinent to any discussion of political Zionism and Judaism and current events both globally and in the Middle East. While I agree in many respects with what Shahak says about the growing zealotry and subsequent danger of the fundamentalist element within the Israeli government and the state itself and the views of this element with respect to the racist ideology displayed by Israel today toward the Palestinian people, yet at the same time I must disagree with some of the analogies that Shahak makes with respect to statements referring to Nazi Germany and the work camps. My views on this matter do not correspond with these statements but I don’t think this is the main focus of the article and these disagreements can be dealt with elsewhere. I only wish here to register my disagreement so that the position of RadicalPress.com with respect to this controversy is known in advance. Ed.]

[The following article is authored by Allan C. Brownfeld, Executive Director of the American Council for Judaism, and is reprinted with permission from their publication ISSUES, which may be found at www.ACJNA.org . Catholic Insight brings this article in order to deepen our readers’ understanding of the forces at work in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. I thank Mr. R. Tyndorf for referring it to us. Editor]

——
The death of Israel Shahak in July has taken from us a genuinely prophetic Jewish voice, one who believed deeply in democracy and human rights, and rejected the ethno-centrism which has come to dominate both the state of Israel and much of organized Judaism, not only in Israel but in the U.S. and other Western countries as well.

This writer first met Israel Shahak on a visit to Jerusalem in 1973. We were in contact ever since, getting together when he visited the United States. He wrote a number of very thoughtful articles for Issues.

In many ways, Shahak was a victim of history who tried to learn from his own experience, and apply what he learned to others.

The youngest child of a prosperous and cultured Polish Jewish family, he and his mother, father and brother were forced into the Warsaw ghetto during the Nazi occupation. Shahak’s brother escaped and joined the Royal Air Force, only to be shot down. His father disappeared and Israel was hidden with a poor Catholic family until his mother could no longer pay for his keep. In 1943 both he and his mother were deported to the Bergen-Belsen concentration camp.

Liberated from Bergen-Belsen

A starving 12-year-old when he was liberated from Bergen-Belsen, Shahak soon emigrated to British Mandate Palestine with his mother. He went on to have a distinguished career as professor of chemistry at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. He was repeatedly voted the most admired teacher by students. On one occasion, he risked his life to save a student from the flames surrounding her when an explosion occurred in a university laboratory.

After the 1967 war, Shahak became a leading member of the Israeli League for Human and Civil Rights and was elected chairman in 1970. He devoted the rest of his life to opposing the inhumane treatment inflicted upon Israel’s Arab citizens and upon Palestinians in the occupied territories.

While American newspapers, both Jewish and general, completely ignored the death of Israel Shahak, an obituary in The Guardian of London (July 6, 2001) by Elfi Pallis notes that, “Shortly after the 1967 six-day war, he (Shahak) concluded from observation that Israel was not yet a democracy; it was treating the newly occupied Palestinians with shocking brutality. For the next three decades, he spent all his spare time on attempts to change this. He contributed to various small papers, but when this proved to have little impact, he decided to alert journalists, academics and human rights campaigners abroad. From his small, bare West Jerusalem flat poured forth reports with titles such as ‘Torture In Israel’ and ‘Collective Punishment in the West Bank.’ Based exclusively on mainstream Israeli sources, all were painstakingly translated into English. World coverage gradually improved, but Shahak never let off; he never became blase. Watching him read out a small news item about an Israeli farmer who had set his dogs on a group of Palestinian children was to see a man in almost physical distress. Shahak came to believe that these human rights incidents stemmed from Israel’s religious interpretation of Jewish history, which led it to ignore centuries of Arab life in the country, and to disregard non-Jewish rights. Confiscation, every school child was told, was ‘the redemption of the land’ from those who did not belong there. To Shahak, this was straightforward racism, damaging both sides.”

Shahak’s Vision

Israel Shahak’s vision can perhaps best be found in his books Jewish History, Jewish Religion (Pluto Press, 1994), and Jewish Fundamentalism In Israel (Pluto Press, 1994), written with Norton Mezvinsky, a professor of history at Central Connecticut State University and formerly a member of the staff of the American Council for Judaism.

In Jewish History, Jewish Religion, Shahak points out that while Islamic fundamentalism is vilified in the West, Jewish fundamentalism goes largely ignored. He argues that classical Judaism is used to justify Israeli policies which he views as xenophobic, and similar in nature to the anti-Semitism suffered by Jews in other times and places. Nowhere can this be seen more clearly, in his view, than in Jewish attitudes to the non-Jewish peoples of Israel and the Middle East.

Shahak draws on the Talmud and rabbinical laws, and points to the fact that today’s extremism finds its sources in classical texts which, if they are not properly understood, will lead to religious warfare, harmful to men and women of all religious beliefs.

(more…)

“The Talmudists” 1934 by Max Weber
___________________________________________

[Editor’s Note: Elizabeth Dilling, all things considered, was a prophetess in her own time. Her various works, which include her exposure of the Zionist Jewish infiltration of the United States of America and her analysis of Bolshevism, Communism and Zionism as one Beast with numerous names, are a testament to her courage and her foresight in revealing the truth during a period of American history when to speak out was to risk the inevitable attacks by the Jewish establishment. Groups like the American Jewish Congress and B’nai Brith International and their attack-dog the Anti-Defamation League, were always ready and willing to vilify anyone who dared to speak out about their plans to implement their one world government and Elizabeth Dilling was forced to deal with their Talmudic tactics from the moment she picked up the sword of truth.

Each chapter of her book is preceded by the Forward and an Introduction. Readers who go beyond Chapter One will find it convenient to just scroll down the page until the start of the new chapter.]

—————

Foreword

Elizabeth Dilling Stokes was born, raised, and educated in Chicago. After attending the University of Chicago she married, and for many years devoted her life to her children, social activities on the North Shore of Chicago, and being a concert harpist. After hearing of the great “humanitarian experiment” in Soviet Russia, she traveled there in 1931, and was able to go behind the scenes. She was shocked at the forced labor, the squalid living quarters, and deplorable living conditions, and the atmosphere of fear created by the Soviet dictatorship.

She was most shocked by the virulent anti-Christianity of the atheist Communist regime.

Following her return to the United States she lectured and wrote about what she had seen, realizing from the opposition which immediately arose that a substantial Marxist movement was active in the United States.  In 1934 her first book The Red Network was published, an expose of the persons and organizations furthering Red causes in the United States.   In 1936, her second book, The Roosevelt Red Record and Its Background, was published.
Almost immediately after these books were published, she was attacked as “anti-semitic,” although she had actually offered her anti-Communist services to Jewish organizations, and knew nothing of organized Jewish involvement in the Marxist movement.  After researching and studying, however, in 1940 she published her third book The Octopus, which dealt with these subjects.

After World War II commenced, Mrs. Dilling became convinced that, despite President Roosevelt’s protestations that not one American boy would ever again fight on foreign soil, there was a movement afoot to involve the United States, with the result that a substantial part of the world would be communized later.

In 1941, she led a Mother’s March on Washington to oppose the “Lend Lease” bill, proclaimed to help keep us out of war by its sponsors, but proving the last step for our involvement.  The bill passed by only one vote.  A few months later, the United States went to war.

In 1944, Mrs. Dilling’s views involved her in the now infamous mass “sedition” trial.  The case was ultimately dismissed  by a Federal Court as “a travesty on justice.”

She was later remarried to Jeremiah Stokes, a Christian anti-Communist writer, and she continued to write and lecture in behalf of Christianity and Constitutional Americanism, first publishing this book in 1964.

(more…)

I recently received a reply from a longstanding associate of mine who is currently attending a post-secondary institution as what might be termed a “mature student”. He was writing in response to the article, “Huffing and puffing to silence criticism of Israel by The Electronic Intifada” which I had sent out to my list. He wrote, “Waddya expect from Dominant White Upper Class media outlets?” In turn I replied, ““Dominant White Upper Class media outlets” ? Surely you jest. That sort of rhetoric is the product of attending too many “psyche” classes. They are Jewish media outlets. ALL of them.”

That sparked the following reply from my colleague which forms the basis of the subsequent article.

“Aint or aren’t jewish people white?  My point is that anywhere you turn, there is carefully constructed misinformation by those in power; usually white, usually dominant, usually upper class..and no snide comments about me psyche’ please.  Maybe they are all jewish..that is not my core concern.  My concern is with the injustice of it all; the damage and prevalence of the misinformation; the damage by control-by a few; to society.  The outcomes of that structure-I don’t care if they are all little green men.  My focus would suggest that the heads of these corrupt corporations have a very bright light shone on them-and that they be held accountable, and are fired, jailed etc.; but the public-lemming population is too stupid, compliant, and imprinted to demand effective change from their elected reps-who are predominately corrupt and on the take anyway.  The outcomes are bad-for example, one classmate in International Business said last week-while the prof. was explaining the extreme constraints of communism (he’s Romanian) and how good it was to have the “free ability to vote in the West” - “yah! right! are we really free? do we really have a choice?  and the prof (conditioned) jumped down his throat (in ignorance).  Last: my International Text (pure propaganda) expounds the amazing benefits of globalization and free trade: while I know the devastating truth from research projects.  Misinformation-carefully planned and presented for the youth of the future to accept as good, that which is not in many respects-if any at all.  People have to wake up from their complacency and ask:-who am I? what is happening to me? who is responsible? what can I effectively do about this?  For you it’s the jewish people, for me, it’s the corrupt corporate and government officials; and the ruling class assholes behind them-little green men, or not.  I CANNOT BELIEVE THE ABSOLUTE IGNORANCE OF SOME OF THE YANK (LAYMEN) POPULATION I SEE ON T.V. DISCUSSING POLITICS!  Just look at McCains “little religious stand-up doll”… that’s how stupid they are..they move these fools’ focus around so easily-while the real business takes place….ELECTION AFTER ELECTION……”

Dear Mr. M,

As a matter of fact, no.  Real Jewish people are Semites i.e. Arab and therefore not Caucasian. That is those who are truly Judaic. They are known as the Sephardic Jews and usually are dark-skinned like the rest of the Arab peoples. What we have today (90%+) are the Ashkenazic Jews who don’t have a Semitic gene in them. See Arthur Koestler’s “The Thirteenth Tribe” for details. But that is beside the point.

Like you, my concern is with the injustice of the system itself and of course those who instituted, nurtured and presently control it. That is the only point, from reading your growing awareness of the game plan, where we differ. The literature which verifies and justifies my position is not to be found on the bookshelves of the institutions of higher learning. As the old saying goes, “been there, done that”. That, by the way, is the precise reason why Mr. T dropped out of the game back in ‘69. Acidic lucidity prevailed at the time for the greater good of my higher self (thank God) and set me on a different path to understanding how the world is designed economically, socially, spiritually and politically.

In your case it appears that your destiny is to dive deep into the murky pools of propaganda that exist within the system or structure. Why? Because, as it is becoming apparent, when you finally surface you will then possess the Grail of Truth and be able to wield it like a sword, not only for personal discernment but for exposing the lies and the sham(e) of the game-plan of these pseudo, self-chosen little gods who now run the show from behind the scenes.

You say you don’t care who they are that are shining that bright light into the eyes of the compliant ones. For you they could be little green men. Icke calls them reptilians from another dimension. Others refer to them as the Synagogue of Satan. They have many names but most of them are coined for the purpose of subterfuge, that is to mask who who they really are. This is obviously done with the idea in mind that if you (whomever) attempt to identify this elite group by name you will suffer the immediate backlash of being maligned and accosted and threatened and discredited as being a “racist, anti-Semite” aka a Jew hater. That is the ring of fire which surrounds the inner core of those of whom you speak. Even the analogy to fire is apropo as one easily associates it with the holocaust myth, an integral component of their propaganda defense mechanism. Certainly it is easier to refer to them as little green men or collusive corporate creeps or dominant white upper class heartless hyenas, etc. It is the first stage of realizing that in fact there is a mask covering the seemingly faceless, haphazard machinations of the present system. The Socialist Malon, back in the mid-19th Century, referred to those controlling the system as being the “Judaized Plutocracy”. That I suggest is likely the closest one can come to identifying this cartel and it dovetails nicely with the more modern terminology Political Zionism.

(more…)

The Biggest Threat to Canadian Jewry is Zionism

by Arthur Topham

August 25, 2008

The following article is a response to Ezra Levant’s recent attack upon Brother Nathanael Kapner who operates an anti-Zionist website out of the USA called http://www.realjewnews.com Levant’s article, “What is the biggest threat to Canadian Jewry?” found at http://www.ezralevant.com was posted Aug. 22, 2008. In it he poses the question, “What do you think the biggest threat to Canadian Jewry is in 2008?” and then goes on to slander and demean the owner of RealJewNews. The following is my reply to Levant.

The biggest threat to Canadian Jewry in 2008 Ezra is the perverted and dangerous Zionist influence emanating from the likes of yourself, Mark Steyn and those of the deluded, mind-controlled “Christian” Zionists who have been brainwashed into believing that Zionism is somehow representative of true Christian values and symbolizes such idealistic illusions as the lie that the state of Israel is a beacon of freedom and democracy in the Middle East.

When you further make statements like the following, “Luckily, Canadian Jews have leadership that is bold and decisive in tackling the issues and problems that matter to Canadian Jewry.” I would hasten to add, and where, pray tell Ezra, is this “leadership” that you boast of? Could you be subtlely referring to your own ego-induced, Zionist-influenced perspective on reality? Have you now finally succumbed to the dillusion that you are one of the upcoming “chosen” leaders of Canada as per the statement of your former mentor Michael Walker of the Fraser Institute who once remarked in the Preface to your first book, Youthquake, (1996) , “It is written by one of the brightest student interns ever to work at The Fraser Institute. It is important because of the insights it provides into the mind-set of the next generation of Canadian leaders. For, certainly, Ezra Levant is going to be a Leader.” [emphasis added. A.T.]

As I wrote in my critique of your “Jews for free speech” article on July 4, 2008, Free Speech for Jews: A Critique of Ezra Levant’s “Jews for free speech” article http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=759 “Well Ezra, if you are going to be a “Leader” here in Canada then you are going to have to hit the books some more and get a much firmer grasp on the issue of Political Zionism and learn how this alien and anti-Christian Talmudic doctrine is affecting the Canadian landscape. It behooves you to understand the primary motives of those who are determined to turn this nation into another Communist gulag.”

You go on to write:

“And for Leo Adler of the Simon Wiesenthal Center, the biggest threat to Canadian Jewry is an ageing hippie and former rock musician named Milton Kapner. As the name suggests, Kapner is Jewish. And he’s American. According to a story in the Boston Globe, he’s homeless, and lives in his Buick.

Kapner has gone a little nuts, so he calls himself Brother Nathanael. Check out that glove — that’s my favourite touch, along with the 220-volt beard.” [please see Levant’s site for images. A.T.]

Such puerile, prejudiced comments Ezra are precisely what identifies you as a proponent of political Zionism and as such a bigot and a coward of truth. Considering your own nerd-like profile displayed on your site I would hardly think it either intelligent or advisable to be demeaning another person for the way they look but then that’s the standard Zionist approach (or ought I say reaction?) whenever someone challenges the fundamental Talmudic underpinnings that mark and exemplify the twisted and deceptive and dangerous tenets which comprise the Zionist political ideology. If you can’t shoot the messenger, which is the standard Mossad methodology used by Israel in Palestine and elsewhere, then do your damnest to vilify and demean them with as much ad hominem abuse as your limited imagination can muster in the vain hope that others will then fall for your ploy and not actually read and think about the information contained in Brother Nathanael’s postings.

I already know, from reading the rudimentary rantings contained in your little Fraser Institute propaganda booklet, how you view the hippie generation so it comes as no surprise that you would be doing your best to smear people such as Brother Nathanael and myself (a die-hard hippie of the first degree), but to think that you can merely get away with it because you’ve created for yourself a small audience of like-minded bigots who’ve fallen for your calculated rhetoric is a grave error. I’ve been exposing the likes of your ilk from before the time you were born and so if you think you are so self-assured and righteous that you can verbally shit on those who’ve laboured in the fields of the Lord for decades in order to bring forth true fruit, unblemished by centuries of Zionist Jew lies and deception, well, my son, your are sorely confused and mistaken.

The inference in your ego-bound remarks regarding Brother Nathanael is that he has “gone a little nuts” because he decided to forego being a “Jew” and instead turned his vision and his faith toward Jesus Christ. Now most of your followers are likely as ignorant of the Babylonian Talmud as (possibly) you are but I, being neither a fan or yours nor unaware of what your Jewish “bible” the Talmud teaches with respect to Christianity, don’t fall for all the bullshit that you’re attempting to spread around the internet regarding either the motives or the moral worth of a fellow Christian Brother such as Brother Nathanael Kapler.

I know from studying your Talmudic teachings that there is likely only one thing that Jews hate more than Jesus Christ and Christians in general and that is a fellow Jew conspirator turned apostate. Death by any means possible and preferrably the slowest and most excruciating, is too good for someone who turns away from the inherent hatred and pathology contained in the Talmud to consign their soul to the loving embrace of Jesus Christ. Your attacks here are living proof of this practice, one that has been ongoing within your Talmudic traditions for thousands of years now.

Apart from your vile attempt to discredit Brother Nathanael by questioning the sanity of his conversion to Christianity your additional bileous build-up of the former traitor and henchman Simon Wiesenthal is equally revealing and pathetic. Illustrating once again the bigotted, deceptive nature of your purpose you portray the Simon Wiesenthal Center as some laudable organization yet on the other side of that forked tongue of yours you bad-mouth and piss and moan about Richard Warman and his attacks upon your good person, not stopping (apparently) to think that this same organization, constructed by Zionist Jews for the sake of enhancing Zionism ambitions in the post-war period by this known Nazi-collaborator, has been hosting and training and supporting Richard Warman for years.

If you are so damned concerned about Warman being a threat to freedom of speech in Canada then you ought to be presenting the evidence to your readers that shows this phoney bastard Simon Wiesenthal for the fake that he was rather than giving us the same old same old propaganda that the Zionist media has been flaunting on the Canadian (and world) public for years. Better you mention Jules Deschenes’ comments regarding Wiesenthal in his “Commission on War Criminals, 1986″ rather than the smoke and mirror b.s. you’re presently pushing. Give people facts Ezra not Zionist spin and more lies and misinformation.

To call the adle-brained head of the Simon Wiesenthal Center, Leo Adler, a “brave leader” is on par with calling any of the present and former war criminals who led and lead the false Jewish ‘state’ of Israel “brave” leaders. They’re nothing but a bunch of murdering, atheistic psychopaths who deserve to be in jail for their incessant criminal activities over the past sixty years and more of indiscriminate killing and torture and destruction that has plagued the Palestinian people ever since Zionism began its nefarious incursions into Arab territories under the pretentious false flag that they only wanted to create a “spiritual” homeland for Jewry and not a nation state of racist bigots and power-crazed warmongers.

You go on in your zio-screed to further accuse Brother Nathanael of being “anti-Semitic” and in doing so attempting to extend and legitimize one of the greatest of Zionist-induced deceptions ever to grace the stage of 20th and 21st Century history. The Semites are Arabs Ezra and you can bet your bottom dollar that you and the vast majority of your pro-Zionist followers, Jew or otherwise, don’t possess a milliliter of Semitic blood in either of your veins. So cut the propaganda crap about “anti-Semitism” because we know who the Semites are and we know why you use this ruse to stymie discussion of important issues; issues that Brother Nathanael presents exceedingly well on his increasingly popular website known as http://www.realjewnews.com Not bad I should think for a homeless hippie who lives out of Buick, eh?

Like Brother Nathanael I’ve had my own website shut down on short notice due to the machinations of the likes of Harry Abrams and B’nai Brith Canada and it’s a bloody crime and one that no publisher ought to be subjected to so I can appreciate the hardship that Brother Nathanael had to endure.

In closing I’ll just add this. In my former critique of your article on “Jews for free speech” I made the comment that I had not seen any proof that you were a supporter of political Zionism. Well, now that I’ve read these recent attacks upon Brother Nathanael that confirmation is clear. For all your future ballyhooing about freedom of speech and the Human Rights Commissions and the evils thereof I shall henceforth view your motives as suspect and your words as duplicious lies designed to further supplement the gross abominations that have already plagued the world with misery, death, wars, destruction and pollution ever since the inception of this satanic cult of Zionism began poisoning the minds of humanity at the turn of the 19th Century.
———-

Kangaroo Canada

by Douglas Farrow

Copyright (c) 2008 First Things (August/September 2008).
http://www.firstthings.com/

Mark Steyn is the author of the bestselling America Alone, a witty tirade against the decline of the West, a portion of which appeared in the Canadian magazine Maclean’s. Ezra Levant was the publisher of a journal called the Western Standard, which in 2006 reprinted cartoons depicting Muhammad from a Danish newspaper. Steyn and Levant have now been hauled before Canada’s human rights commissions to answer to charges of hate speech.

These commissions (HRCs, for short) were set up in the 1960s and 1970s with the aim of combating discrimination on a practical level. In recent times, however, they have transmogrified into mechanisms for enforcing politically correct ideologies and silencing dissent. “It never occurred to us,” remarks Alan Borovoy, one of the originators of the HRCs, “that this instrument, which we intended to deal with discrimination in housing, employment and the provision of goods and services, would be used to muzzle the expression of opinion.”

That is exactly what has happened, through the mechanism of Section 13 of the Human Rights Act, which prohibits hate messages. Under Canada’s criminal code, the incitement of hatred is already counted a crime—but against that charge, truth and good faith are viable defenses, and the burden of proof lies with the accuser. Not so with the Human Rights Act. As James Allan, a law professor in Queensland, marvels: “To be in breach of these hate-speech provisions, you don’t have to counsel violence; you don’t have to urge discrimination; you don’t have to express hatred; you don’t even have to have said or written something that did, in fact, subject some group to hatred or contempt. All that is needed is that your comments, in the view of the sort of people chosen to staff these tribunals, are ‘likely’ to expose someone or some group to contempt or hatred.”

Allan, like many other bemused observers, refers to the HRCs as kangaroo courts. Their proceedings display a bouncy ineptitude and, simultaneously, a sinister level of collusion. Take, for example, Richard Warman, a former investigator for the national commission who decided that it was more fun to be the aggrieved victim of a human rights violation. He has filed twenty-six complaints so far, including more than half of Section 13 complaints to the Canadian Human Rights Commission (CHRC). What’s more, he has a perfect 100 percent conviction rate for these complaints.

These quasi-judicial bodies are staffed by political appointees who have neither the qualifications nor the independence of regular judges. Their ad hoc procedures provide no firm rules for evidence; bigoted comments, posted by strangers to websites in foreign jurisdictions, have been judged admissible, for example. No actual proof of harm is required in order to obtain a conviction. Investigations and deliberations are driven by far-reaching, utopian mandates to “reduce discrimination and promote social change.”

The growing train of hate-speech prosecutions might have been derailed as long ago as 1990, when an appeal brought Section 13 under review by the Supreme Court in Taylor v. Canada. The court found, however, that the Charter’s guarantee of freedom of expression “is not unduly impaired.” Writing for the majority, Chief Justice Dickson opined that, “as long as human rights tribunals continue to be well aware of the purpose” of Section 13, “there is little danger that subjective opinion as to offensiveness will supplant the proper meaning of the section.”

That view now appears rather naive. Allegations have been made that agents or former agents of the CHRC have themselves posted hate messages online under pseudonyms, and even by way of Internet identity theft, and that their activities in manufacturing offenses have been covered up by evidence and transcript tampering. Meanwhile, for evidence that “subjective opinion as to offensiveness” is getting the upper hand, one need look no further than the recent judgment against Stephen Boissoin. A Protestant pastor, Boissoin was brought before the Alberta commission for a letter to his local newspaper in which he issued a “war cry” against “the aggressive propagation of homo and bisexuality” and articulated some decidedly countercultural opinions, asserting that “where homosexuality flourishes, all manner of wickedness abounds.”

(more…)

“The Talmudists” 1934 by Max Weber
___________________________________________

[Editor’s Note: Elizabeth Dilling, all things considered, was a prophetess in her own time. Her various works, which include her exposure of the Zionist Jewish infiltration of the United States of America and her analysis of Bolshevism, Communism and Zionism as one Beast with numerous names, are a testament to her courage and her foresight in revealing the truth during a period of American history when to speak out was to risk the inevitable attacks by the Jewish establishment. Groups like the American Jewish Congress and B’nai Brith International and their attack-dog the Anti-Defamation League, were always ready and willing to vilify anyone who dared to speak out about their plans to implement their one world government and Elizabeth Dilling was forced to deal with their Talmudic tactics from the moment she picked up the sword of truth.

Each chapter of her book is preceded by the Forward and an Introduction. Readers who go beyond Chapter One will find it convenient to just scroll down the page until the start of the new chapter.]

—————

Foreword

Elizabeth Dilling Stokes was born, raised, and educated in Chicago. After attending the University of Chicago she married, and for many years devoted her life to her children, social activities on the North Shore of Chicago, and being a concert harpist. After hearing of the great “humanitarian experiment” in Soviet Russia, she traveled there in 1931, and was able to go behind the scenes. She was shocked at the forced labor, the squalid living quarters, and deplorable living conditions, and the atmosphere of fear created by the Soviet dictatorship.

She was most shocked by the virulent anti-Christianity of the atheist Communist regime.

Following her return to the United States she lectured and wrote about what she had seen, realizing from the opposition which immediately arose that a substantial Marxist movement was active in the United States.  In 1934 her first book The Red Network was published, an expose of the persons and organizations furthering Red causes in the United States.   In 1936, her second book, The Roosevelt Red Record and Its Background, was published.
Almost immediately after these books were published, she was attacked as “anti-semitic,” although she had actually offered her anti-Communist services to Jewish organizations, and knew nothing of organized Jewish involvement in the Marxist movement.  After researching and studying, however, in 1940 she published her third book The Octopus, which dealt with these subjects.

After World War II commenced, Mrs. Dilling became convinced that, despite President Roosevelt’s protestations that not one American boy would ever again fight on foreign soil, there was a movement afoot to involve the United States, with the result that a substantial part of the world would be communized later.

In 1941, she led a Mother’s March on Washington to oppose the “Lend Lease” bill, proclaimed to help keep us out of war by its sponsors, but proving the last step for our involvement.  The bill passed by only one vote.  A few months later, the United States went to war.

In 1944, Mrs. Dilling’s views involved her in the now infamous mass “sedition” trial.  The case was ultimately dismissed  by a Federal Court as “a travesty on justice.”

She was later remarried to Jeremiah Stokes, a Christian anti-Communist writer, and she continued to write and lecture in behalf of Christianity and Constitutional Americanism, first publishing this book in 1964.

(more…)

http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=8249

Germans Enraged by Merkel’s Grovelling Goy Show
By Mike James in Germany

20 March 2008

As Angela Merkel this week genuflected in an obscene show of gratuitous and fawning grovelling before the bandit state of Israel, a ‘nation’ born in a sea of blood and built upon the corpses of murdered Palestinians and desecrated centuries-old orange groves, the people of Germany, privately, or after-hours in local cafes and taverns among trusted friends and neighbours, seethed with barely repressed rage.

“She said we only exist to enrich them, or words to that effect,” a usually reserved and mild-mannered local restaurateur told me as I dropped by for cigarettes. “Why doesn’t she just move there? The Israelis can keep her because we don’t need her. She’s done nothing for us!”

The proprietor looked out across the empty tables that, eight years ago, were all fully booked from Monday through to Sunday. Despite an up tick during the World Football Championship year of 2006, she’s running at a loss again. She wonders how much longer she can keep her family business going. She wonders why the German government has betrayed her by attacking the middle class.

“All they care about is Israel. Nothing’s too good for them, especially my taxes.”

Merkel got a good press this week. Germany’s best-selling tabloid gave her the Schindler treatment. She pretty much apologised for being German, for even daring to set foot on such holy, immaculate ground. Just think of the poor Jewish microbes that must have died underfoot as she strolled around Tel Aviv on the last leg of her visit. Six million of them? Prophecy fulfilled? One shudders to think.

“The [alleged] holocaust fills us Germans with shame,” she told a jubilant Knesset on Tuesday last, onion in hand.

Well, I’m sorry to break the news to you, Mrs Merkel, but that’s simply not true. It’s your capitulation to the dark, Satanic forces of Zionist evil that fills the German people with shame.

“The security of Israel is for me as German Chancellor never negotiable,” Merkel went on.

Unlike the security of the German people who increasingly find themselves living in fear of gangs of marauding immigrants who have taken up Federal Republic passports yet can barely speak one word of the German language, or of the thousands of hardened criminals, burglars and drug mules who have crossed the line from the east unchecked, thanks to the treasonous Schengen Agreement and the recent abolition of proper border controls.

“Compassion arises from taking responsibility for the past,” she continued.

Was she about to mention the demonically violent theft of Palestine by the Stern Gang and Irgun terror squads, the Zionist’s 1948 bombing of the King David Hotel, the vicious Israeli attack on the USS Liberty, the Sabra and Shatilla massacres of Palestinian women and children as they lay sleeping in their tents, the illegal and murderous invasion of Lebanon, and the continuing genocide of the Palestinian people who are being starved to death and used as moving skeletal targets by sadistic Israeli soldiers and airmen?

Don’t hold your breath, folks.

“Only if Germany admits to her Nazi [ethnic nationalist] past can the future be humane,” she declared without any reference to the apartheid, ethnic nationalist state of Israel. Not even a wry smile, the slightest smirk, or a telling nod and a wink to the Shining Ones in the front row.

“Anti-Semitism [criticism of the state of Israel and the perniciously evil ideology of Zionism] must never be tolerated in Germany or in Europe,” she went on, adding that ‘holocaust denial’ [the practice of asking troubling, science-based questions about anomalies in historical reportage] must be punished wherever it’s found.

Well, you can start with this writer, Mrs Merkel. You know where I am.

“Me too,” said 74-year-old Alfred as he took a seat next to me in a local tavern that evening. “They died the same way we did at the end of the war: through starvation and disease. In fact, they probably had it better. Millions more of us Germans died of starvation and illness back then.”

(more…)

http://zionistwatch.wordpress.com/2008/02/16/hate-and-endless-anathemas-upon-all-our-goyim-heads/

Hate and Endless Anathemas Upon All Our Goyim Heads

By Patrick Grimm

February 16, 2008

European-Americans, along with every other non-Jewish subset are under an assault from the Self-Chosen on a daily basis. As much as Jews try to pretend they subscribe to a “free to be you and me” type of multi-culti Kumbayah group-hugging Politics of Meaning, this is only a façade, a mugging for the cameras, to obscure the deep and abiding unspoken hate and endless anathemas they daily declare upon ALL of our Goyim heads. As an escapee from the Jewish prison cult of haughty, hooked-sixer-schnozzed personalities, Israel Shamir explains, Jews see non-Jews as “children of a lesser God.” In other words, we are throwaways, we are urchins and ratty ragamuffins.

Jew TV situation comedies make jokes about European-Americans as “goy toys”, things to be used for labor or quick flings that can be tossed away or treated as less than the Jew ubermensches. The moneymen funding these programs are not patriotic, flag-waving Americans. In fact, they loathe our European heritage, they spit on our traditions and the only country they would have any loyalty to at all is Israel. Of course, all those quips and cracks about “goy toys” are like a Yiddish loudspeaker call for kosher sex in the Unholy Land of brothels and Mogen David snuff films and kiddie pornos starring the Aryan unwashed. Rabbis, while taking a break from reading the Talmud, frequent whorehouses and get to gangbang a voluptuous goy that an Israeli slavemaster grabbed from the Ukraine or Russia.

Understand one thing. Jews have not been victimized more than non-Jews. They just own all the newspapers so that they are able to tell the world if one of their own gets a paper cut or nicks himself with a knife and blames it on a Muslim or spray-paints a swastika on a Jew’s headstone or leaves a ZOG on a Jew day center and pins it on the nearest white person, and God help that Caucasian if he is racially aware. But be that as it may, any anti-Jewish action will be blamed on the Other, always, even after it has been discovered to have been staged. Why? Hate. Endless anathemas.
(more…)

http://www.marwenmedia.com

9-11 Truth and The Holocaust
By Wendy Campbell
Wendy Campbell/Marwen Media info@marwenmedia.com

There is a website ( http://911review.com/denial/holocaust.html ) with a page entitled “Holocaust Denial Versus 9/11 Truth.”

That title gives away the real perspective of the writer as being a Zionist Jew however the writer declined to divulge his ethnicity or religion or even his/her name. (For the record, I am not Jewish by way of ethnicity nor religion. I am of Swedish, English and Irish ethnicity and of Christian background. I am a human rights activists who advocates for completely equal rights for all with no exceptions, especially here in the US and also in Israel, which is dependent on massive US financial and otherwise support.)

I am going to deconstruct this obvious Zionist Jewish writer’s article here.

First of all, most people who are supportive of the growing skepticism about the official Jewish version of what Jews have coined as “The Holocaust” prefer to call that skepticism “Holocaust Revisionism” rather than “Holocaust Denial”. The reason for that is that everyone knows that Jews were persecuted by the Nazis during WWII, which lasted from 1939 to 1945 (a total of six years). No one denies that. Please note that the Zionist Jews have been persecuting non-Jewish Palestinians in Palestine-Israel ever since the Jewish state was created in Palestine in 1948 (that’s 60 years of persecution). Unfortunately in general, Jews tend to deny that fact, even though it is well documented by some prominent Jewish writers and also in the booklet “Origin of the Palestine-Israel Conflict” written by Jews for Justice in the Middle East, at http://www.cactus48.com

In keeping with a true democracy, Holocaust Revisionism is completely legitimate just as any historical event must always be allowed to be further researched in a scholarly manner, especially with the modern forensic techniques, something which the Holocaust Fundamentalists/Obsessers have never bothered with. They rely only on conflicting eye-witness accounts.

Real 9-11 Truthers seek the Truth about all matters, especially with regards to politics related to the subjects at hand: US foreign policy, Israel, Palestine, Zionism, WW I and WWII, etc.

The Holocaust Fundamentalists are putting people in jail in some countries for publicly questioning the official Jewish version of “The Holocaust”, a term which they have basically trademarked for only Jewish use to try to suggest that Jewish suffering during WWII was unique above all other people’s suffering in all of humankind’s history. Closer scrutiny will reveal that this is the chauvinistic viewpoint put forth by Jews via their prolific output of books, articles, movies and TV specials via the news media which they tend to dominate.

The fact is that even though at trials of such Holocaust Revisionists as Ernst Zundel, whose defense brought up significant truths with regards to certain aspects of the official Jewish Holocaust story, using forensic experts and cross-examining top Jewish Holocaust leaders such as Raul Hilberg, revealing many conflicting discrepancies in their stories, the judge found Ernst Zundel, who is a pacifist with no previous criminal record, guilty of “incitement to hatred” and he’s been in jail for years, first in Canada and now in Germany where he was extradited to. You can google him for the details. Remember there are always at least two sides to every story, so do your cross-referencing. So the end result was that the Truth about the Holocaust was/is completely irrelevant in his trial. The fact is that his powerful political enemies want him in jail. Period. It’s like the Grand Inquisition. Even his defense lawyer in Germany has now been put in jail.

Look at who “hates our freedoms” by the way. The Zionist Jews are the ones who are pushing the so-called “hate speech” laws in this country, with the help of the powerful Zionist Jewish group: the ADL. If they have their way, they will put in jail anyone who questions the Jewish version of The Holocaust, anyone who criticizes Israel as the Jewish supremacist state that it is, anyone who suggests that Israel had anything to do with 9-11, especially those who believe that Israel-firsters were the driving force behind making 9-11 happen. Meanwhile the ADL and their related Zionist groups are silent about the US mainstream media’s daily articles filled with what amounts to hate-speech against Muslims, Arabs and Iranians, and fully supports the so-called US war on terror, which is obviously something Israel fully supports as well.

(more…)

http://www.goodnewsaboutgod.com/

Dr. Lorraine Day writes:

A dense darkness is falling over America and the World. Truth-tellers are becoming an extinct breed. Many Americans are afraid to speak the truth or even to hear the truth, fearful of intimidation by the government, and ridicule and ostracism by their friends and family.

Some on the internet, who are willing to post “all points of view,” are becoming increasingly squeamish about taking a hard stand for truth on sensitive issues. They exercise their “Freedom of Speech” (sort of) while still trying to remain politically correct, attempting to dance delicately through the political minefields while trying to remain “acceptable” to all sides.

All too frequently these days, when one boldly speaks truth, the listener begins to get nervous and fidgety, furtively glancing over his or her shoulder, and often responds, “You better be careful what you say.”

Whatever happened to REAL Freedom of Speech in America? On this web site, you will find an in-depth analysis of the story behind the news, the real truth - from the political, social, religious and medical perspectives - and where each story fits into the bigger picture of the diabolical plan of the Illuminati and the Zionist Jews to destroy America and to rule the World.

————–
This web site is owned and operated by Lorraine Day, M.D. ALL of the information written on this web site has been written by Lorraine Day, M.D., who is totally responsible for its content, with the exception of links to other documentation to support this web site information. In those cases, it will be obvious that another author has written it.

THE MISSION OF THIS WEBSITE IS TO TELL THE TRUTH AND TO EXPOSE LIES

I believe in the following:

• God created All persons equal. No person is better than any other person. God loves everyone the same. I do NOT believe in “Supremacy” of ANY person, ethnicity, group, organization or nation above another.

• There are Truth-tellers (on specific topics) found in all groups: Christians, Jews, Muslims, Hindus, Buddhists, New Agers, and in many other groups. There are also, in every one of these groups, those who tell Lies.

• This web site exposes the Lies, irrespective of the person who tells them. This web site attacks the Lies, and NOT the person.

• Eventually, God will save everyone He has created, not IN their sins, but FROM their sins. AFTER they have reaped what they have sown! No one will get away with anything! But God does not throw away anything that He has created. Instead, eventually He will make “ALL new!?

• When TRUTH is told here, it is told without compromise. You will notice that this web site has no advertisers and does not solicit donations, two situations that tend to compromise any Truth-teller.

• Every person has been given by God, the right and obligation to tell Truth and expose Lies. In addition, the Constitution of the United States, if indeed it is still in effect at all, gives U.S. citizens this right.

• I am not an activist, I am a Truth-teller. I do not picket or march in support of political, religious or social agendas nor do I encourage others to do so. I have no organization. I just write and speak Truth.

• I am a pacifist. I do not believe in violence, I don’t believe in war of any kind and I don’t believe in guns for self-defense even though I uphold every U.S. citizen’s right to bear arms according to the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights. I am not a member of any Patriotic organization although I consider myself to be a Patriot. I love America the way it should have been, not the way it is now.

• I am a Bible-believing Christian but I do not believe in Organized Religion. I believe that Christianity is NOT a religion, it is a personal relationship with Jesus Christ. I believe the “Organized Churches” have usurped the place of Jesus Christ.

• A true Christian will exhibit the character of Christ, and therefore will always be a pacifist, will not support war of any kind, will love his or her enemies, and will do good to those who hate him or her. A true Christian will want to know Truth (Jesus said, ” I AM the Truth”) and will not be afraid to share Truth with others.

• The present-day Jews are NOT God’s “Chosen People.” God does NOT play favorites. He doesn’t love some more than others. God’s “Chosen People” are the true followers of Christ who are “Chosen” for one thing only: to exhibit to the world the character and disposition of Jesus Christ, no matter what happens to them. Everyone, eventually, will be in this category.

• I believe that being a Truth-teller is more important than preserving one’s own life.

Anti-Christianity: A term that is all but absent from the vocabulary of the population even though it is being practiced daily all over the world, including in America. Why? Because the Anti-Christian barrage comes from the media, virtually ALL of which is controlled by the Jews – who HATE Christianity. The media and all the Jewish organizations, including the Jewish ACLU and Jewish Hollywood, spew hatred continually against Christianity yet they scream “Anti-Semitism” when anyone says something that “offends” the Jews, even when that “something” can be proved in a Court of Law to be TRUE!

Anti-Semitism: Here is the definition of Anti-Semitism from the lips of a Jew: “Anti-Semitism does NOT signify opposition to Semitism. THERE IS NO SUCH THING. It is an expression we use effectively as a SMEARWORD, used to brand anyone who brings criticism against us.” Harold W. Rosenthal (Jewish), administrative assistant for then-U.S. Senator Jacob K. Javits (Jewish) of New York, in an interview with American Christian magazine editor, Walter White.

“A man is considered an anti-Semite if he calls a Jew a Jew.” Hillaire Belloc, quoted in Culture Wars (Sept 2000).

“My unpardonable crime,” said Boris Lunachev, a former leader of the Communist Youth in Russia, “was to call a Jew a Jew.”

Eighty to ninety percent of all the “Jews” in the world have NO Semitic ancestry, they are Khazars - - of “Gentile” origin, barbarian Mongol Turks, from the area of Khazaria (now the Caucasus portion of Western Russia), people who, in about 740 A.D., accepted the religion and/or culture of Judaism. Very few, if any, “Jews” in the world today, have any Semitic blood (Semite, from the word Shemite. Shem was one of the sons of Noah). See The Thirteenth Tribe, by Jewish author, Arthur Koestler.

This term, anti-Semitism, is often incorrectly used by “Jews” to smear and discredit non-Jews who are looking for truth in history.

(more…)

[Editor’s Note: The following Response to the allegations by Harry Abrams and the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada that the Radical Press website is spreading “hatred toward Jews and citizens of Israel” is posted below. It was also contained in the article “Killing The 100th Monkey” which was sent out to the Internet on Thursday, January 3, 2008 and can be found at http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=628 . Readers interested in just the contents of the Response itself can copy it directly from this post and refer to it by the url itself.]
———–

From:

Arthur Topham
Pub/Ed
The Radical Press
Canada’s Radical News Network
radical@radicalpress.com
http://www.radicalpress.com
“Digging to the root of the issues since 1998”
————————————————————

Thursday
January 3, 2008

To:

Sandy Kozak sandy.kozak@chrc-ccdp.ca
Anti-Hate Team Investigator
Canadian Human Rights Commission
Investigations Branch
344 Slater Street,
Ottawa, Ontario
K1A 1E1
Toll-free 1-888-214-1090
Fax (613) 947-7279
Website: http://www.chrc-ccdp.ca

Dear Ms. Kozak,

Re: File No: 2007 1016

Please find enclosed my answers to the questions contained in the original September 13, 2007 letter from Michel Pare, A/Deputy Secretary General and my response to the allegations by Harry Abrams and the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada, also contained in your initial correspondence which I first received via Canada Post on November 20th, 2007.

Prior to presenting my answers to the ten questions from Michel Pare I will first respond with an overall assessment of the complaint from Harry Abrams, B.C. representative for the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada and explain why I feel it is a vexatious, spurious, and disingenuous charge; one that, for the reasons which I will present, ought to be dismissed outright by the Canadian Human Rights Commission, hereafter referred to as the CHRC.

As well, as a precautionary preface to any commentary on these matters, I would ask that you bear in mind that all of my comments are not to be misconstrued in any manner as emanating from a place of malice or, as the CHRC might define it, “hate”. I speak my mind freely, frankly and honestly as a basic human right, one which presumably applies to all Canadian citizens. I do so with the deepest and sincerest intent that what I say will assist both you, as an investigator for the CHRC, and the rest of the Tribunal members, to realize that I and many Canadians view the actions of the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada with grave and rightful suspicion and interpret their actions, such as this “hate-crimes” charge, as not being in the best interests of the Canadian people nor conducive to a free and well-functioning democracy. It is therefore my hope that you will come to a similar realization with respect to these allegations once you have given due consideration to the arguments and the information which I intent to present in favour of such a position.

To begin I must say that it would be a gross understatement indeed to suggest that Harry Abrams and his partner in this complaint, the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada are exploiting and abusing the intent of the Canadian Human Rights Act for their own narrow, partisan, ideological purposes; ones which I feel strongly are not designed to promote and ensure the freedom of expression that the vast majority of Canadians demand and expect but rather are meant to buttress and support the political aims of a foreign state (Israel) of which these organizations are but political extensions.

(more…)