Alberta Al’s letter to the Jasper Fitzhugh on the smearing of Monika Schaefer and her right to freedom of speech

ALBERTAALNEWHDR copy

From: “Al Romanchuk” romanesq@shaw.ca
Subject: The smearing of Monika Schaefer and her right to freedom of speech
Date: July 22, 2016

 

Mr. Clarke,

Not only was I disappointed in your article allowing the printing of the condemnation of Miss Schaefer by Ken Kuzminski and the two Jewsish organizations, I became downright angry.  I am an 80 year old now retired in Kelowna but was once the alderman and Mayor of Grande Prairie where I lived and worked as a lawyer for 15 glorious years.  Allowing Mr. Kuzminski to smear  and degrade Miss Schaefer, along with the Jewish organizations THE CENTRE FOR ISRAEL & JEWISH AFFAIRS and the EDMONTON JEWISH FEDERATION, for no apparent good reason other than in your OPINION she went too far in her video questioning the so-called Jewish holocaust.

I have been an avid free speech advocate all my life.  I believe that freedom of speech INCLUDES the right to offend.  If people don’t like what I say or write they don’t have to hear me nor read my articles.  But here you have allowed self-seeking groups and an individual to perpetuate a lie about Miss Schaefer when all she REALLY did was IN HER OPINION deny the holocaust.  And there are many deniers out there.

As a lawyer I have been taught to question, question, question and question because you’ll never get an answer without questioning.  So I took the liberty of writing to these two Jewish organizations, one of which labelled Miss Schaefer an “ignoramus” and “anti-semite”, and asked them a simple question:  SINCE YOU HAVE ASSERTED THE POSITIVE THAT THE GERMANS WERE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE KILLING OF EXACTLY 6 MILLION JEWS DURING WW2, PLEASE PROVIDE ME WITH WRITTEN AND SUBSTANTIATED EVIDENCE OF YOUR ASSERTION BECAUSE IT IS YOU THAT HAS THE BURDEN OF PROOF.  I have yet to receive answers.

KuzminskiNDP

As for Mr. Kuzminski he ought to be ashamed of himself as President of the Jasper Legion to inflame the public against Miss Schaefer for expressing her opinion.  Quite frankly I don’t think that Mr. Kuzminski knows the first thing about the history of the so-called Jewish holocaust of WW2.  His bigoted opinion against Miss Schaefer deserves the worst condemnation because as the grand pooh-bear of a prestigious organization he should know better.  If he doesn’t believe in free, unfettered speech then he should have the guts, the mettle, to say so.  The same goes for every Jewish organization in Canada.

I support Miss Schaefer and HER DEMOCRATIC RIGHT to say what she wants in a non-aggressive manner and her video is no exception.  Blocking freedom of speech and of the press is nothing short of silencing those of us who believe in the unrestricted right to our freedoms.

ALEXANDER S. ROMANCHUK
Kelowna, BC
Email: romanesq@shaw. ca

The crisis of access to justice and self-represented litigants — as I see it by Denis Rancourt

RancourtJusticeCrisisHdr

The crisis of access to justice and self-represented litigants — as I see it

By

Denis Rancourt, PhD

DenisGRancourt

Screen Shot 2014-09-17 at 9.06.00 PM

There is a crisis of access to justice in Canada. It is a crisis of systemic judicial partiality against ordinary citizens who cannot afford brand-name “justice”.

Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin frequently warns of a crisis of “access to justice” in Canada. This crisis involves a large and growing number of self-represented litigants who cannot afford lawyer’s fees, which are inflated by corporate clients.

The Facebook group “Canada Court Watch” is focussed on self-represented litigants and has over 4,000 members. Self-represented litigants regularly picket outside courthouses and lawyers offices across the country. Researchers, such as law professor Julie Macfarlane, have described a widespread disillusionment and distrust of the legal establishment by ordinary self-represented litigants from all walks of life.

Beyond what is acknowledged by the chief justice and the legal establishment, there is a widespread conviction among self-represented litigants that the courts are biased against them. I am the coordinator of the Self-Represented Litigant Workgroup of the Ontario Civil Liberties Association, and I have experienced this bias directly as a self-represented defendant.

In a single case of alleged defamation for words on a blog, I have been required to go before 17 different judges, at all courts up to the Supreme Court of Canada, in over 30 open court hearings, over more than three years — in the motions, appeals of motions, and case conferences in the action against me. I have prepared thousands of pages of legal documents, and I have been ordered to pay legal costs of the suing party of more than one quarter of a million dollars to date, prior to the trial that is now on-going.

In light of my recent experience as a self-represented litigant, it is difficult for me to believe that the pleas of the chief justice are authentic. I tend to think that the chief justice means only that lawyers should be affordable and available for ordinary persons, and that she wishes that the legal processes were less wasteful. However, access to lawyers alone does not provide access to justice, and neither does strong-handed case management by judges.

I feel like I have seen it all in terms of the behaviour of judges, in terms of the tremendous systemic bias against self-represented litigants, and that is described by legal researchers. This bias exists irrespective of my level of education (PhD) and irrespective of my ability to present an argument (former university professor), and so I believe what I have heard about what it is like for a single parent navigating issues of child custody.

In my case, the potential for systemic bias is increased by the fact that the plaintiff is a high-status lawyer within the legal establishment, and two of the lawyers who oppose me have formerly represented Canadian prime ministers. In addition, the private plaintiff is funded without a spending limit by a non-party using public money, a situation that has been denounced by the Ontario Civil Liberties Association (LINK).

At the mandatory mediation I was not allowed an accompanying person (because he was not a lawyer) even though I faced five lawyers on the side suing me. But obvious asymmetries of means are not the only problem.

The evidence for routine judicial bias, as I see it, is overwhelming and includes:

•    the trial judge cancelling my main and pleaded defence, off-the-cuff and in the middle of my opening address to the jury

•    judges and lawyers disrespectfully referring to me in court as “he”, and discussing me as though I were not present (until this behaviour was denounced on the Ontario Civil Liberties Association website)

•    judges’ frequent, repeated, and disorienting interruptions of me in court

•    allowing opposing counsel to make repeated and hyperbolic prejudicial comments, despite my objections

•    not allowing me time to make my arguments, despite my good preparation and organization

•    refusals to hear evidence of misconduct by opposing counsel

•    refusing to acknowledge transcript evidence of opposing counsel leading his witnesses in out-of-court examinations

•    allowing procedural dirty tricks by the lawyers, such as calling motions on one day’s notice

•    constructive barring of my evidence on motions and at trial, using both procedural technicalities and legal abstractions

•    allowing the plaintiff to pick and choose which questions to answer in cross-examinations

•    orders that I pay outrageously high costs, which in effect punish me for trying to defend myself, despite the fact that I have no money

•    orders that I, rather than the opposing party, pay costs even in the cases where I won all or the majority of the points argued in the motions

•    disadvantageous deadlines for document submissions and disadvantageous scheduling of court appearances, despite objections with reasons

In fact, there appears to be no limit to what the court thinks it can get away with when dealing with a self-represented litigant.

In my own case, for example, I discovered that a motions judge (in a motion to end the action) had a blatant conflict of interest. In the middle of the proceedings, I learned that he had strong personal, family, emotional, and contractual financial ties to a party intervening for the plaintiff in the case, and also to the law firm representing the party in court. He had not disclosed any of these ties. The judge’s ties made it inconceivable that he would rule against the plaintiff.

When I presented the evidence of the judge’s ties, the judge lost decorum, threatened me with contempt of court (a criminal judgement), and recused himself, but refused to rule on whether there was apparent bias, and continued to release decisions that stand to this day.

I raised the matter through available procedures with three more judges of the Superior Court, three judges of the Court of Appeal, and six judges of the Supreme Court (in two applications for leave to appeal), but all of them refused to allow bias as a ground for appeal.

In my first attempts, I was not even allowed to access the Supreme Court. It is a demonstration of apparent systemic judicial bias at the highest level that the Registrar of the Supreme Court refused to accept my duly prepared application — and then refused to accept my motion to denounce his refusal to accept the application. This was resolved only because the Ontario Civil Liberties Association made a request, directly to the Chief Justice of Canada, that the Registrar’s conduct be investigated.

That whole bias episode, involving 13 judges from three courts, shows the degree to which the entire judicial structure will tolerate a judge’s apparent bias, at least when the bias complaint is brought by a self-represented litigant being sued by prominent members of the legal establishment.

The only remaining remedy in the matter resides in international law. I am preparing a complaint to the UN Human Rights Committee for violation of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which guarantees an impartial court to every litigant in signatory countries, including Canada. Few self-represented litigants can defend themselves this effectively, and there are far too few resources among civil rights organizations to address the gargantuan need.

All of this has only been repeated at the trial itself, which started on May 12, 2014, and which is on-going. Prior to trial, I had asked then Regional Senior Judge Charles Hackland (who resigned on May 8, 2014) to name a case judge who had no connection with the University of Ottawa, and I had made a formal motion for the trial judge to recuse himself because of the judge’s shared interests with the University of Ottawa (LINK). None of this mattered and the trial judge refused to recuse himself. This, and the judge’s in-court actions, led to my walking out of the trial, which was reported in the media (LINK1, LINK2).

My case, the ordeals of countless others, and academic research show that there is a systematic bias against self-represented litigants. Such evident, overt, and pervasive bias proves that the judges are not impartial, but rather are significantly influenced by the social status and power of the litigant. Corporate and government litigants know this well, and count on it. It is the elephant in the courtroom for self-represented litigants.

For self-represented litigants the crisis in “access to justice” is really a crisis in access to an impartial court, a court that is not influenced by social status. This crisis will not be solved by increasing access to lawyers and reducing court backlogs. The solution will require that litigants themselves and civil rights organizations insist on and monitor impartiality of the courts.

In my case, high-profile American political activist Cynthia McKinney has started a petition demanding that the chief justices of Canada allow a new trial with a trial judge having no ties to the University of Ottawa — which is funding the lawsuit without a spending limit — and this has been reported in the media (LINK-petition, LINK-media). Only this type of protest-application of the open court principle, in combination with media exposure and civil society association pressures, has any chance of catalyzing a reform in a system that has now degraded itself beyond self-repair.

There is indeed a crisis, and it is of the court’s making. It is a crisis of partiality against ordinary citizens who cannot afford brand-name “justice”.

——-

Professor Rancourt has taken a courageous stand and like myself he needs your help in order to defend himself against all of these spurious charges that have resulted from his expressing his opinions on matters relevant to Canada’s democratic principles. For further information and contact please see:
—-

This article was originally published HERE May 25, 2014

Background Links:

Petition site — Give a Fair Court Hearing to Denis Rancourt

Ontario Civil Liberties Association campaign page

The motions judge’s apparent-bias legal saga

Court documents in my motion for the trial judge to recuse himself

All (most) court-filed documents in my case

InYourFaceBook – Cyberspace Thugs Expelling Thought Criminals from Social Media by Justice4Germans

QuesCariSent Editor:Pub

 

[Editor’s Note: It was only recently that I was speaking rather highly about Facebook and defending it against critics who were suggesting that this Jew-owned social media was anathema to real, honest freedom of speech and expression. Given the fact that I was able to publish my own articles and link to others who also were telling the truth about what’s going on in the world I figured that Facebook was actually doing a great service in the pursuit of truth. That was my feeling until I recently got word that my good friend and associate who runs the Justice4Germans blogsite was permanently banned from Facebook for publishing the truth about the real history of Germany and its endless vilification in the Jew media.

Justice4Germans (J4G) was doing an excellent job of presenting the German side of the true story of the 20th Century in a very professional-like manner without any of the grossness that one sees elsewhere on the net. His efforts were well received by those who were following his posts on Facebook and I, for one, was most appreciative of his superb efforts.

Now J4G is banned permanently for presenting his research for people to read.

His story is not that much different from my own in the sense that the censorship arm of the Jewish criminal cartel that desires absolute control of all media has now successfully eliminated J4G from Facebook just as they are attempting to shut down RadicalPress.com and take away my freedom to express alternative news items. In my case of course they have employed the “justice” system to do their dirty work via the use of first sec. 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act and secondly by using sec. 319(2) of the Canadian Criminal Code. Either way, no matter how you look at it, the Jewish lobbyists and their cowardly complicit components within the Gentile society are hell-bent on shutting up all dissident voices and only permitting their own heinous propaganda to be spread around the world wide web.

As J4G explains in his fine essay below the front organization for the International B’nai Brith, the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) is, as usual, fully involved in all efforts at censorship of the Internet. Funny thing is they are also the same secretive, occult, Freemason organization that’s been hounding and harassing me now since 2007.

Some things never appear to change and the Jew’s psychopathic preoccupation with controlling the thoughts and ideas and opinions of the world’s population is one of them. That situation is fortunately changing whether they like it or not for no group of power crazed individuals can ever gain absolute control over the Truth. The only thing necessary is for the truth seekers to continue to expose their hypocritical asses whenever they attempt to pull off their Bolshevik/Cheka Big Brother bullshit censorship agenda. Until I see Justice4Germans back on Facebook I will not be supporting this “social media” propaganda venue again.]

 

Screen Shot 2013-06-11 at 11.50.40 PM

by Justice4Germans

justice4germansyoutube-logo3

thought-crime

 

“In times of universal deceit, telling the truth will be a revolutionary act.” ~ George Orwell

Welcome to the world of “Anti-Social media”! Virtual Pogroms and Cyber-Expulsions are now underway across the Internet to prevent awake and aware thought criminals and activists from socializing and sharing information, as well as, from organizing to protect themselves and their interests from global tyranny and the New World Order agenda.

Over the past few weeks, this writer has experienced Bolshevik style stalking, surveillance harassment and bullying first hand!  Both my J4G Facebook profile and my personal FB profile have been the subject of continual attacks resulting several temporary blocks ranging from 12 to 24 hours, as well as repeated deletion of material and status messages that I’ve posted, on completely bogus charges of having violating their “community standards”. My posts have in no way shape or form violated these standards of conduct! The same has happened to dozens of my “Facebook friends”!

Early on Monday morning [June 11, 2013 Ed.] I was finally expelled from Facebook.  My J4G account was disabled by the Cyber-Thugs and I was locked out, probably for good, based upon yet even more dangerous, ludicrous and absurd charges.  I have sent them a letter of protest, though I am not holding by breath for a response nor any sort of hearing, much less a reversal of their decision. This process is entirely arbitrary and sudden. No warnings are given, no proof provided, and and no chance of rebuttal is given. They act as judge, jury and executioners, much like the Soviet Secret Police.

Here is a screenshot of what they said ….

account-disabled-goodbye

 

Excuse me ??

I can assure my readers that I have NEVER posted any material or messages which promote violence  or which depict, promote or condone ANY of the above, and many of my Facebook friends and followers can attest to this fact! Nor have I permitted any such comments on my “wall”. In fact, I have previously deleted and blocked well over 100 people from friends’ list due the content they shared or comments they posted on my wall which violate the FB terms and thereby put my account at risk, and in some cases, which also offended me. They are welcome to their opinions, but not within my realm, be that on Facebook or other social media, or as comments on my blog, or in such a way that puts work and reputation at risk.

So, what’s really behind this?  

It is pure Soviet style censorship of the TRUTH under the guise of “antisemitism”. Sadly,  most of the sheeple have been conditioned to believe that word to mean “hatred of Jews” with an implied meaning of “intention to harm Jews”.  In fact, the term refers to a variety of middle-eastern languages “Semitic languages”, and not at all to “race”, much less to so-called “Jews”  but who are in fact overwhelmingly “Khazars” and thus,  perpetrating fraud against humanity (the Gentiles).

thefreedictionary.com says:
Se·mit·ic (s-mtk) adj.
1. Of or relating to the Semites or their languages or cultures.
2. Of, relating to, or constituting a subgroup of the Afro-Asiatic language group that includes Arabic, Hebrew, Amharic, and Aramaic.
n.
1. The Semitic languages.
2. Any one of the Semitic languages.

So,  if anything really needs to be banned,  it should be the use of that fully perverted word,  as it’s implied meaning is a farce and used as a weapon of mass destruction , just as much as the word “Nazi” is another bogus term, as I have explained in a previous post. It is used to smear, tar and feather all those who speaks the truth about the International Bankster Gangsters or “Usury Mafia” (and who call themselves “Jews”, and are not) which run this planet, and to stifle dissent and to bully anyone who exposes how this criminal gang operates,  and what their agenda really is.  Other such epithets used to stifle dissent and debate include terms like “conspiracy theorist”, or when they are really desperate, they will use the word “terrorist” too demonize the truth-tellers and activists, because apparently, the truth scares them to death!

big-brother-facebook1

 

Indeed, it is all very Orwellian.  Black is white, white is black. Up is down. Wrong is right. Right is wrong. And it is “in your face” now. They are not only liars,  criminals and thugs, but also haters; the very thing they accuse everyone else of being.

They are engaged in “Anti-Gentilism” with an agenda to co-opt, subjugate and rule over ALL of humanity (all races, nations and cultures).   And no, I am NOT talking of a “Jewish Conspiracy” but a “Criminal Conspiracy” of global proportions.  Again,  THEY are the ones who call themselves “Jews”, not me!.  I don’t buy their BS nor use their terminology, but rather, I attempt to expose it. They are haters of truth and of truth-tellers, because they know that “THE TRUTH WILL SET YOU FREE” from their tyranny and global hegemony, and so, and as history has shown, this criminal cabal will go to any and all lengths, including inciting, causing and funding World Wars to protect their interests, or to further them. They care not how many millions of lives are lost in the process, nor how much long-term suffering is caused, and will also profit from it.  They did it twice with Germany and to many other countries since, and are doing even today.

Some assert that this is a Zionist agenda and all for a rinky-dink peace of real estate in Palestine, but I don’t buy that. They already have that. These fraudsters or posers merely use IsraHell and the lessers of their Khazarian Klan as a wedge, and as a “firewall” to protect and furhter their global interests.  These Bankster Gangsters  could care less what happens to those of the lower caste as they have demonstrated many times in the past. Indeed, they are very happy to see the peons get the blame and to take the repercussions for their own innumerable evil deeds and “crimes against humanity”, which go on to this day, all because of “sheeple”  (including self-described “Jews”) who buy into their BS and swallow it whole, or even use it to their own ends.  They too need a “wake up” call, to grow a conscience,  and some balls,  and to start speaking the truth, as have Brother Nathaniel, Henry Makow, Benjamin Friedman, Myron Fagan and others.

Here is how they are manipulating the sheeple and social media, in addition to Law Enforcement and Alphabet Soup agencies to do their “dirty work” and do so to their OWN detriment, at their own expense, out of their own ignorance and gullibility.

“My people perish for lack of knowledge” ~ God

facebook-offended

 

Facebook’s blind spot to Antisemitism

Jerusalem Post
By Internet Engagement

Internet Engagement

Monday Mar 25, 2013

Cover(2)

 

Facebook’s refusal to recognize Holocaust denial as hate speech, and ban it from the social media platform, is today well known. I have monitored this and other manifestations of antisemitism on social media platforms since first exposing the problem of “Antisemitism 2.0” five years ago. Last week, however, I released a major new report [2] revealing additional blind spots in Facebook’s understanding of antisemitism. The nature of these blind spots is startling, from racist images directly based on Nazi propaganda to copies of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion. (snip)

Subtle and insidious forms of antisemitism, like the Protocols of the Elders of Zion and messages calling for the elimination of the Jewish state are  (and blah, blah, blah…)

CONTINUES HERE

Enter Abe Foxman …

2013-06-04-viralhate2

 

Huffington Post, o6.04.13

“[…]Today, while it is a marvelous medium for education, communication, entertainment and commerce, the ways in which the Internet is being used to disseminate and promote hateful and violent beliefs and attitudes are astounding, varied and continually multiplying. In an effort to look more closely at the extent of the problem — and to probe for possible solutions – I recently joined together with my longtime friend and colleague Christopher Wolf, an expert in Internet law and Chair of the Anti-Defamation League’s Civil Rights Committee, to explore these issues and to offer a blueprint for the Internet industry, the world community and societies to work together toward a solution.

The result of this collaborative effort is our new book, Viral Hate: Containing Its Spread on the Internet (Palgrave Macmillan), available in bookstores and for download to e-readers today. Facebook’s announcement that it would tighten its policies on hate speech posts in response to complaints from users about misogynistic posts, including pictures of women being beaten and messages promoting violence against women,* was the most recent reminder of the problems posed by online hate speech.

In a letter in today’s New York Times, we commend Facebook for tackling the issue head on, and will be working with them in the coming months as they see to develop new tactics to address hate speech on their pages.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/abraham-h-foxman/why-we-wrote-viral-hate_b_3383859.html

* that this is what Facebook has FALSELY accused me and others I know of doing!

Well, well, well.  Isn’t it wonderful that these fraudsters and racketeers, who already control the media, are allowed to spew their story all over the internet too, and with mere accusations, in no time flat, can invoke the government, NGOs and Social Media sites to immediately do their bidding? And they are obviously complying too, aren’t they?  It’s as if God himself has spoken to Facebook, except that, in reality it would be the Devil.  And do not put it past them to be creating fake user profiles to disseminate ”fake hate” images and messages in order to justify a massive and tyrannical response either!

The truth is, Facebook is turning a blind eye to antigentilism perpetrated by frauds like YOU and others of your Khazar Klan, who are not asking, but ordering websites to cover up mass murder, genocide, theft, rape and torture being carried out by international war criminals at the behest of your Overlord Banker Buddies who own your ass. Because, and you readers can bet, that if anyone harms one hair on the head of one of their Klan it will be all over their media and the Internet, and they will not say a word about it being “offensive” content!  …will they, hmmm?

And oh,  in case you haven’t noticed, they HATE YOUR FREEDOM too. So use it while you can, think for yourself and stop letting them get away with this BULLYING! You can bet that all of this is going to get a whole lot worse now, unless YOU are prepared to speak up about it and will stop going along with it.

To wrap up, here is a one hour interview which also exposes the real agenda behind all this.  I do NOT necessarily agree with everything said, but I invite you to listen and make up your own minds.  Isn’t that what “freedom” is about?

Revolt of the Plebs Broadcast June 6, 2013

Screen Shot 2013-06-12 at 12.00.41 AM

(Please click on url above image to view video)

Description: “Keith welcomes Professor Ray Goodwin of the Barnes Review to discuss ADL director Abe Foxman’s latest book, entitled Viral Hate, and the concerted efforts to censor discourse on the Internet.”

The only people who would applaud such tyranny and  thought control, and who would attack your most basic right to freedom of expression are guys like this one …

faceboook_stalin3

 

“It is necessary to repeat the truth over and over again, because the falsehoods around us are also being constantly repeated, not by individuals but by the masses, in newspapers and encyclopedias, in the schools and at the universities. Everywhere, falsehood is on top, comfortable and secure in the knowledge that the majority is on its side.” ~ Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, 1828.

J4G

Topham applies for Rowbotham by Quesnel Cariboo Observer

QuesCariSent Editor:Pub

Dear Free Speech Supporters,

The June 7, 2013 weekend edition of the Quesnel Cariboo Observer featured another update on my legal battle with B’ai Brith Canada and the Queen of England.

I’m always thankful for whatever unbiased msm coverage that I do get as generally, beyond Black Press (not Conrad) which is an independent chain located here in B.C., the vast majority of the media is owned or controlled by the Jews and inevitably all that I receive from that viperous venue is more pro-Zionist, hate-filled venom.

I’ve posted the Front Page cover and a screen shot of the actual article for easier reading. Because of the nature of many online publications one cannot just go to the article in question and read and/or copy it to a text format. In the case of the QC Observer one must first buy a yearly subscription to the paper before being able to access the online digital edition. Seems pretty weird to me but that’s how they set it up.

 photo CaribooObsRowbotham_zps2223ba7f.png

RowbothamArticle photo ScreenShot2013-06-09at95814AM_zps08a1ae0a.png

The Tyee: Zionist Collaborator and Hate-monger promotes Fear and Smear campaign against Doug Christie

 

 photo TyeeSmear_zps0b6e7a63.png

[Editor’s Note: I was alerted to this vicious smear of Doug Christie, penned by Tyee contributor Tom Hawthorn, by a good friend and associate only this morning.

In their email regarding the Tyee’s hate-filled screed against Doug the writer said, I am SO TICKED off at the slanderous article in the FUCKING TYEE I could spit right now. OH I am so FURIOUS at the Tyee for printing this crap! It is like the author waited for just the right time to loose his venom…. and his readers all agree. DEAR GOD ARTHUR! sick fucks… pardon me …”

Sick fucks indeed! Yet does it come as a surprise to me? No, not at all.

I’ve been monitoring the Tyee since its inception and have been fully cognizant of its editorial position with respect to the machinations of the Jews and their deadly, nefarious ideology known as Zionism. They are but another of the “left”, “liberal”, “progressive”, “yuppie”, “pseudo-alternative”, “mainstream”, “anti-racist”, “marxist” media outlets that wouldn’t say “shit” about the actions of the Jews even if their mouth was full of it (which it is).

By their actions here in posting this vile, hate-filled diatribe against a man who has given his life to fighting against the very forces that these bigoted bastards now have shown themselves to be a part of, it is but another fine example of how Lady Justice always tends to out those who would deceive the general public, sooner or later. Now we know for sure the true intent and focus of “The Tyee” and who they owe their allegiance to.

As my friend pointed out in their email, even the comments (for the most part) by Tyee readers to the malicious and callous denigrating of the recently dead Mr. Christie tended to reflect the type of online community of Zionist sycophants that congregate around its malignant and odious effusions of hate and calumny. The Tyee, in granting this Zionist grunt their headline space to further the lies of the Jews with respect to the righteous and honorable actions of Douglas Christie, has shown its true colours and they just happen to be blue and white, the same as the flag of the state of Israel.

As previously stated I’ve always known there was something fishy smelling about this online blog and one can only hope that after three or more days of exposing this article to the sunshine of truth that the whole of the Tyee’s reputation for being a disseminator of truth and freedom will stink to high heaven and online readers will approach it with a firm grasp of their nose and the caution it clearly deserves.]

—–

I refuse to adorn my site with this pathetic zio bullshit hit piece and would ask of readers to go to the url provided if they wish to get a good whiff of what truth seekers and lovers of freedom of speech are truly up against.

http://thetyee.ca/Life/2013/03/13/The-Unauthorized-Obituary-of-Doug-Christie/

 

 

 

Simon Wiesenthal Center’s 2012 Top Ten Anti-Semitic/Anti-Israel Slurs by Simon Says….

 

Editor’s Note:

An associate of mine sent me the following email admonishing me for having missed the Top 10 Anti-Semites of the year! 🙂 What could I say but hey, I guess I’ll have to try harder in 2013!

It is quite an array of people who have had the courage to stand up and speak out about a problem that has plagued the planet for a good century or longer on a massive scale. My best regards go out to all of them and the thousands upon thousands more like myself who also are doing our utmost to expose the lies and deception of the Zionist juggernaut.

Power to the Truth and Courage to the Truth seekers!

Arthur Topham

___________

MG writes:

Arthur, you didnt make the list….
All I can say is…
You`re not trying hard enough LOL!!!

http://www.wiesenthal.com/atf/cf/%7B54d385e6-f1b9-4e9f-8e94-890c3e6dd277%7D/TT_2012_3.PDF

SCWAd

 

SWC1

SWC2

 

SWC3

SWC4

"SWC5</a

"SWC6</a

 

http:///s88.photobucket.com/albums/k188/ArthurTopham/?action=view&current=ScreenShot2013-01-07at61342PM.png” target=”_blank”>"SWC7</a

"SWC8</a

"SWC9</a

"SWC10</a

"SWC10A</a

 

Marc Lemire Case: the latest attack on Freedom of Speech by the Canadian Human Rights Commission

Marc Lemire Case: the latest attack on Freedom of Speech by the Canadian Human Rights Commission

By

Christopher di Armani 

http://christopherdiarmani.com/8968/big-brother/marc-lemire-case-latest-attack-freedom-speech-canadian-human-rights-commission/

I had a long conversation with Marc Lemire on Wednesday evening, December 19, 2012.

For those not familiar with his name, Marc Lemire is the one and only man to ever win a case against the Canadian Human Rights Commission (CHRC). Until Lemire was hauled before this Kangaroo Court the Canadian Human Rights Commission had a 100% conviction rate.

It’s really not that hard when the Truth is no defense and the “judge” can disallow any evidence you present without justifying that action.

Anyway, there was a development in his case this week that does not bode well for the Rights and Freedoms of ALL Canadians. Marc Lemire just happens to be the person being terrorised in this particular manner today.

It is important to remember a few things about Marc Lemire’s case.

1. As soon as Marc Lemire was made aware of the complaints against him, he removed the “offending material” from his website.

2. Despite the “offending material” being removed from the internet, the CHRC refused to drop the case against Mr. Lemire.

3. Repeated attempts by Marc Lemire and his lawyer Barbara Kulaszka at mediation with the CHRC was refused. This wasn’t about “remediation” as the law says, but about silencing individuals with whom the CHRC disagrees.

4. Marc Lemire was found “guilty” of a single infraction. That infraction was for a post on his website that he did NOT create, and contained an article written by an American author. Marc Lemire had nothing to do with the “offending” post, other than to host the website it was on.

5. The Canadian Human Rights Tribunal in Marc Lemire’s case admitted that Section 13 of the Human Rights Act is unconstitutional.

6. The Canadian Human Rights Tribunal in Marc Lemire’s case refused to administer the penalty against him because they knew it was unconstitutional.

7. The Canadian Parliament has already repealed Section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act. It is waiting for the Canadian Senate to pass it as well, which will happen early this coming year, and then Section 13 will be repealed.

8. Despite all these facts, the boneheads at the CHRC are now pushing for a lifetime BAN on Marc Lemire’s Freedom of Speech while they still can.

They’re desperate to implement their ban on Marc Lemire while this atrocious law is still on the books.

Once Lemire is stripped of his Freedom of Speech by a federal court order, it won’t matter if Section 13 is repealed or ruled unconstitutional. The lifetime ban will still apply.

That is wrong on so many levels I don’t even know where to begin.

Marc Lemire is now battling for his (and OUR) Right to Freedom of Speech on two fronts.

First, at the Federal Court of Appeals, where he is appealing the finding of Justice Mosley. Mosley found that Section 13 was constitutional, but that Section 54 (the penalty clause) was not.

It’s an absurd decision and one that Marc Lemire is fighting to overturn with his appeal. Lemire has also filed a 240 page motion to the Federal Court of Appeals requesting a stay of the earlier Federal Court ruling so the CHRC cannot issue a lifetime speech ban against him.

Second, at the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal, where Lemire will fight the proposed lifetime ban.

If Freedom of Speech is important to you, then please give generously to Marc Lemire’s Legal Defense Fund. He desperately needs your help as he fights for the Right to Freedom of Speech for ALL Canadians.

You can donate with your check via Canada Post, payable to:

Marc Lemire
Attn: Free Speech Legal Defence Fund
762 Upper James St, Suite 384
Hamilton, ON  L9C 3A2

If you would prefer to give online, please send your donation via PayPal.

Anyone giving $50 or more to Marc Lemire’s Legal Defense Fund will receive a digital copy of Lemire’s book Dismantling Tyranny.

 

Remember… The choice is Free Speech or Approved Speech.  If Marc Lemire loses this case, Canadians will forever be subjected to “Approved Speech” by minions of The State.

That’s not the kind of Canada I want to live in, and I hope you feel the same.  Support Marc Lemire’s fight for OUR Right to Freedom of Speech without government intervention.

————————-

You can see the article online at:  http://christopherdiarmani.com/8968/big-brother/marc-lemire-case-latest-attack-freedom-speech-canadian-human-rights-commission/

 

 

Radical Press Legal Update #7

NewLegalUpdateLogo-700

notice4RP

Radical Press Legal Update #7

Radical Press Legal Update #7

Yesterday’s  Bail  Hearing was a three hour session in the Quesnel Court house.

The regular Judge who has been presiding over the various applications thus far was unable to attend and instead we had a female Judge by the name of M. Church who heard the application.

Crown of course had first kick at the cat and Crown Council Jennifer Johnston opened her remarks by giving Judge Church a brief overview of the case which included her reasons for why Crown has still not provided my lawyer with full disclosure in the case.

According to CC Johnston the period from my initial arrest on May 16, 2012 until October 9, 2012 had proven to be an insufficient time period in order to get enough evidence together so that an Indictment could be handed down by the October 9 deadline and that, apparently, somehow justified not providing Mr. Christie with full disclosure.

After the October 9 deadline I was no longer under the original bail conditions that restricted me from posting on my website although for some odd reason I didn’t become aware of this fact until close to 3 weeks after the fact .

The Crown eventually got their sworn information on November 5, 2012 and notified my lawyer that there would be a call date set for Nov. 6 where I was to appear in court. That date was subsequently changed to the 8th of November as Doug Christie was out in Saskatchewan attending to another case and couldn’t appear via telephone on the 6th. It was Crown’s letter to Mr. Christie on Nov. 5th that also informed him that Crown had asked for an endorsed warrant that would allow Crown to have all of the original bail conditions reinstated.

When I appeared on November 8, 2012 the Judge listened to both sides of the arguments and ruled that only some of the original conditions would remain i.e., those concerning my order not to have any contact with the two knaves  who laid the alleged complaint to the RCMP and also the cops hanging on to my illegally stolen firearms. At the same time he set a new date of December 13, 2012 when Mr. Christie could be in court to represent me and Crown would be given the opportunity to argue for the reinstatement of the additional restrictions originally imposed on me by Det – Cst Terry Wilson on the day I got out of jail.

Of course December 13, 2012 proved to be bad timing weather wise and my lawyer was unable to fly into Quesnel that day so again a decision on Crown’s application was delayed for another week which brought it up to December 19, 2012 which was yesterday.

After running through that time line Crown then began their argument for wanting to reinstate the additional Orwellian restraints that would prohibit me from posting articles anywhere on the Internet available to the general public or to allow anyone else to post on any of my other websites that were owned by me.

Just prior to commencing her argument Crown Council Jennifer Johnston told Judge Church that unfortunately she hadn’t been able to provide Mr. Christie with the big fat 1″ thick bail disclosure document because she had been informed by Det – Cst Terry Wilson that when the Indictment was handed down the National Post had published an article on the case which contained statements that the reporter had gleaned from another website called FreeDominion.ca. Those statements were from what is called a “Warned” statement which is considered by the courts to be part of disclosure and therefore confidential information that is not supposed to be given out to the public. The Warned statement was a digital voice recording that Det – Cst Terry Wilson had made of his conversation with me just prior to my release from jail on May 16, 2012. Why IT was given to my lawyer when all the other disclosure documents are still being withheld by Crown is still a mystery to both myself and Mr. Christie but in the case of this particular document when I received a copy of it I didn’t realize it was confidential and had so I had shared it with an associate in a private email and unbeknownst to myself failed to notify them that it was confidential.

Anyhow a couple of quotes were taken from it and posted in the National Post and that was the big reason, according to CC Jennifer Johnston why she was refusing to divulge any more disclosure materials to Mr. Christie. This issue had come up on Dec. 13 when Crown was arguing before Judge Morgan that a second application had been filed regarding the matter of the illegal disclosure but no agreement could be found at the time and Mr. Christie had refused to agree to it.

At this point Crown told Judge Church that she would be willing to let Mr. Christie take a look at the bail disclosure document even though Crown’s application had not be resolved but that he would have to give it back at the end of the hearing! All of this was the typical Catch-22 scenarios that have been playing out since day one of this charade.

The Judge obviously knew that Mr. Christie couldn’t be expected to argue against something he hadn’t even seen so after a bit of discussion it was agreed that Crown would give Mr. Christie the disclosure document and a short 15 minute recess would be called so that he and I would have an opportunity to take a look at what Crown was planning to use in their argument for reinstating the original harsh bail conditions on me.

It only took about 5 minutes of perusing the document to realize what was going to be the Crown’s argument and we quickly went back and let the clerk know that the recess should end as soon as possible and court resume. Mr. Christie was well aware of the time constraints and needed every minute for his arguments.

Court resumed and Crown Council Johnston began her argument that I had been publishing all these articles, updates, etc. since November 2, 2012 (legally, mind you) and then proceeded to go through individual posts selecting various quotes to back up her position. It was the standard Zionist double-speak argument that posts were continuing to spread hate toward the Jews and Zionists and were attacking unfairly Det -Cst Terry Wilson and his partner-in-crime Cst Normandie Levas and thus possibly endangering their safety!

This went on until about 3 p.m. when she finally concluded her remarks and a break was taken before Mr. Christie was given time to present his arguments.

The issue of the leaked disclosure was addressed first and Mr. Christie told that Judge that he would have no problem with the Court issuing an Order stating that in future neither he nor myself would disclose any confidential information to any third parties not directly connected to the case and definitely not for publication.

Doug then commenced his argument with a bountiful supply of case law references and quickly outlined for the Judge some precedents which included the legal right for publishers and writers to criticize both Jews and Zionists citing articles in various mainstream publications like the New York Times and other Zionist controlled media. His point being that no particular group is exempt from criticism and that includes Jews or those who support political Zionism. Regarding my criticisms of the RCMP he also pointed out to the court that the RCMP were certainly not above criticism and given their public image of late he didn’t feel Crown’s argument in this regard was worthy of consideration.

He also made it crystal clear that what Crown was attempting to do flew in the face of any and all statutes currently within the Canadian legal system. By that I mean Crown’s attempt to curtail my Charter Rights to freedom of expression and access to the Internet prior to my case being heard in a court of law and a decision being handed down as to whether or not I did in fact publish materials that were ultimately deemed to be “willful promotion of hatred” as contained in sec. 319(2) of the Canadian Criminal Code.

To a priori assume that whatever I am publishing is “hatred” and then ask the court to impose such severe curtailments upon my Charter rights prior to being tried is verboten and should not be considered as a reasonable argument.

During Crown’s argument CC Johnston had cited the Basi-Virk Trial (of all trials!) to back up some of her comments regarding the need to protect witnesses. In this instances she was trying to correlate my Warned statement conversation with Det – Cst Terry Wilson with that of secondary witnesses in the Basi-Verk case. When Doug came to this he quickly pointed out to the Judge the vast difference between witness evidence by anonymous third parties and statements directly given to the arresting officer by the accused as was the case in point regarding Crown’s argument.

One by one Mr. Christie countered Crown Council’s arguments and this went on until around 4:15 p.m. at which time Mr. Christie concluded his remarks by informing the Judge that he had a plane to catch before 5 p.m. and that he would have to stop. Doug asked me at this point to call the airport to confirm the exact time when the plane was leaving so I had to leave the court room for about five minutes.

While I was gone Crown apparently tried to refute all of Doug’s arguments and told the Judge that because I was charged with a “Hate” crime that Crown could then basically impose whatever restrictions they wanted to on me. The Judge apparently wasn’t convinced and just when I got back into the court room I heard her telling Crown and Defence that she would be considering the arguments and submitting a request to another body (not sure which one at this point) for further clarification come early January and then after that she would notify Crown and Defence of her decision.

So basically there will be no further bail conditions imposed on myself until January of 2013 at the earliest. We quickly packed up our things and drove Doug out to the airport where he bid us a fond fair well.

For now we will finally have a couple of weeks grace in order to relax a bit and enjoy the Christmas season.

——–

NOTE: Out of necessity I am forced to ask for financial assistance in this ongoing battle with the censors. Due to the fact that the Crown is refusing to give the required disclosure to my lawyer I am not able to furnish legal aid with the required documents that they demand before looking at whether or not I might qualify for legal financial assistance. This leaves me in the unenviable position of having to rely solely upon donations to pay for my legal expenses. The airfare alone yesterday for my lawyer to appear in court in Quesnel to defend me against these false charges was $1,050.00 return and given my minimal monthly pension it’s virtually impossible for me to cover these expenses.
As such I would once again implore readers to give serious consideration to helping me out by either sending a donation via PayPal using either a PayPal account or a credit card or else sending a cheque or Money Order to me via snail mail at the following postal address. Cash of course also works.
Arthur Topham
4633 Barkerville Highway
Quesnel, B.C.
Canada
V2J 6T8
To access my PayPal button please go to either the Home Page at http://www.radicalpress.com or my blog http://www.quesnelcariboosentinel.com The PayPal button is up on the right hand corner of the Home Page on either site.
Sincerely,
Arthur Topham
Pub/Ed
The Radical Press

 

 

 

 

 

CHRC: Gag Lemire Now – Who cares whether or not Section 13 is constitutional?

 

CHRC: Gag Lemire Now – Who cares whether or not Section 13 is constitutional?

 

Fanatical CHRC wants to impose a lifetime speech ban against Marc Lemire and refuses to wait for Court of Appeals to even rule on the constitutionality of the internet censorship law

http://blog.freedomsite.org/2012/12/chrc-gag-lemire-now-who-cares-whether.html

http://canadianhumanrightscommission.blogspot.ca/2012/12/chrc-gag-lemire-now-who-cares-whether.html

The fanatical and discredited Canadian Human Rights Commission is demanding that a lifetime speech ban be placed on internet webmaster Marc Lemire – and they are refusing to even allow the Federal Court of Appeals to make a ruling on the Constitutionality of Canada’s shameful internet censorship legislation – Section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act.

The utter arrogance and obsession with censorship that infests all those who staff the Canadian Human Rights Commission is shocking to many Canadians.  Is it any wonder that its senior investigators consider freedom of speech to be “an American concept?”

But even in the face of their censorship empire (Section 13) crumbling around them, the censors insist on remaining aboard a sinking ship.” 

Over the past few years, Canadians of all political stripes have roundly condemned the fanatical and outrageous behavior of the Canadian Human Rights Commission and their “nazi fetishist” investigators.  Front page articles in the National Post denounced the CHRC.  Editorials from every major mainstream newspaper have called for the CHRC to get out of the thought control business.  The House of Commons has voted to repeal Section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act and that bill is now before the Senate of Canada.   In the Lemire case, the handpicked Canadian Human Rights Tribunal was so disgusted over how the CHRC was conducting itself that a Senior Tribunal member not only found that Section 13 was unconstitutional, but that it was also an affront to the guarantees of freedom of speech in our Charter of Rights and Freedoms

As is typical for the elitist CHRC censors, they simply brushed aside all legitimate criticism. They responded by once again screwing Canadian taxpayers by hiring the super expensive public relations firm Hill & Knowlton for a whopping $170,000! This was a futile and an expensive attempt to reverse the tide of public opinion that was turning against them. But a leopard never changes its spots as the CHRC continued with its devious ways, including spying and trying to entrap Marc Lemire.

So desperate was the CHRC to repair the damage that had been done to its image that it hand picked an expert to write a review of Section 13. After collecting a hefty sum of money, the reviewer turned on them by recommending thatSection 13 be repealed! The only people supporting the CHRC’s draconian thought control regime were those who were directly paid and/or living off the ‘human rights teat.’

Knowing that their days of harassing and abusing Internet writers, bloggers and message board owners are numbered, the CHRC censors knew that the only thing they can do now, is to grind many people through the systems as possible, before their house of cards comes crashing down.

But they have a big problem, and that problems name is Marc Lemire!

Because of his nine year legal battle with the CHRC, and the fact that all human rights cases have been stopped pending a final determination in his case, the CHRC can’t pull out its Coup de grace, and issue lifetime speech bans on all those waiting.

Not only do they demand that a lifetime free speech ban be applied on Marc Lemire, but they don’t even have the decency to wait for the Federal Court of Appeals to rule whether Section 13 is even constitutional.

The CHRC has refused to agree to a stay of an earlier decision of the Federal Court – which is currently under appeal to the Federal Court of Appeals.  As crazy as that sounds, the CHRC is pushing for the punishment against Lemire even before the Federal Court of Appeals can even examine the case.

Because of the CHRC’s refusal; this now opens up a costly two-front battle that Lemire has to face.  While before the Federal Court of Appeals, he also has to fight a case before the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal simultaneously.

Merry Christmas from Lemire:  Motion to Stay

As an early Christmas present to the censors, Marc Lemire has filed a 240 page motion to the Federal Court of Appeals requesting a stay of the earlier Federal Court ruling so that the CHRC cannot issue a lifetime speech ban against Lemire.

Here is a copy of the motion filed with the Federal Court of Appeals on December 11th, 2012, written by Marc Lemire’s courageous and brilliant lawyer – Barbara Kulaszka.

 

APPLICANT’S WRITTEN REPRESENTATIONS

1.      The Canadian Human Rights Tribunal, in a decision dated September 2, 2009, held that the applicant had contravened s. 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act by posting an article entitled AIDS Secrets on his website, the Freedomsite.  However, the Tribunal also concluded that s. 13(1) in conjunction with ss. 54(1) and (1.1) were inconsistent with s. 2(b) of the Charter, which guaranteed the freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression in that these provisions were not a reasonable limit within the meaning of s. 1 of the Charter. Since a formal declaration of invalidity was not a remedy available to the Tribunal, it refused to apply the provisions for the purposes of the complaint against the applicant and did not issue any remedial order against him. [CHRT Decision, para. 307 at Motion Record, page 116]

2.      The respondent Canadian Human Rights Commission filed a judicial review application which was allowed by Mr. Justice Mosley of the Federal Court on October 2, 2012. He upheld the constitutionality of section 13 by severing the penalty provisions of the Act which he declared unconstitutional. [Agent Y v. Lemire, [2012] F.C.J. No. 1233 at Motion Record, pp. 119-187]

3.      The Federal Court held that the application for judicial review was granted and the following judgment granted:

1. The application for judicial review is granted and the matter is remitted to

the Tribunal to;

a. issue a declaration that the publication of the article “AIDS Secrets”

by the respondent Marc Lemire constituted a breach of s 13 of the

Canadian Human Rights Act ; and

b. for determination of whether a remedy for the breach is to be

imposed under ss. 13 and 54(1)(a) and (b) of the Act;

2. It is declared that ss 54 (1) (c) and 54 (1.1) of the Canadian Human Rights

Act are of no force or effect pursuant to s 52 (1) of The Constitution Act,

1982, being schedule B to the Canada Act 1982 (U.K.), 1982, c. 11,1982;

3. The respondent Agent Y is awarded costs for the preparation of

his record and his out of pocket disbursements for attendance at the

hearing against the respondent Marc Lemire.

[Judgment of the Federal Court, at Motion Record, p. 187]

4.      The applicant filed a Notice of Appeal from the decision of Mr. Justice Mosley on the following grounds:

(a)    Mr. Justice Mosley erred in applying the doctrine of severance in upholding s. 13 and ss. 54(1)(a) and (b) of the Canadian Human Rights Act;

(b)   Mr. Justice Mosley erred in basing his decision on a misreading of the Canadian Human Rights Act as it existed at the time s. 13 was upheld as a reasonable limit on freedom of expression under s. 1 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms by the Supreme Court of Canada in Canada (Human Rights Commission) v. Taylor, [1990] 3 S.C.R. 892;  this misreading of the Act informed the reasons given by Mr. Justice Mosley and led him into further error in upholding the constitutionality of s. 13 and 54(1)(a) and (b) of the Canadian Human Rights Act;

(c)    Pursuant to s. 50(2) of the Canadian Human Rights Act;  the Tribunal was entitled to examine the real and factual context in which s. 13 and s. 54 existed in determining whether the provisions remained a reasonable limit on freedom of expression within the meaning of  s. 1 of the Charter, including the manner in which complaints were prosecuted and the practical operation of the statutory scheme. The decision of the Tribunal that this evidence showed that ss. 13 and 54 were no longer a reasonable limit on freedom of expression was correct;

(d)   The extension in 2001 in the Anti- Terrorism Act, S.C. 2001, c. 41 of the application of s. 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act from telephone answering machines, as considered in Taylor,  to computer networks, including the Internet, has rendered s. 13 an unreasonable and unjustifiable limit on freedom of expression within the meaning of s. 1 of the Charter;

(e)    The allegation of “hatred” in s. 13 of the Act imports moral blameworthiness and stigma which renders the provision an unreasonable and unjustifiable limit on freedom of expression pursuant to s. 1 of the Charter;

(f)     The words “hatred” and “contempt” in s. 13 are vague, overbroad and highly subjective, rendering the provision an unreasonable and unjustifiable limit on freedom of expression within the meaning of  s. 1 of the Charter;

(g)    There is no rational, non-arbitrary or fair connection between s. 13 and the objectives of the Canadian Human Rights Act, rendering the provision an unreasonable and unjustifiable limit on freedom of expression within the meaning of s. 1 of the Charter;

(h)    Mr. Justice Mosley erred in challenging and reversing findings of fact made by the Tribunal to which he owed deference;

(i)      Mr. Justice Mosley erred in failing to respect and defer to Parliament’s repeal of s. 13 and s. 54(1) and (1.1) in Bill C-304, which passed the House of Commons on June 6, 2012 to protect freedom of expression.

5.      The article which the Tribunal found contravened section 13 was voluntarily removed from the Freedomsite by the applicant on April 9, 2004, some two weeks after he received notice of the complaint from the Commission.

6.      Only 8 persons from Canada viewed the article, a number which would include the applicant, the complainant Agent Y and the investigators at the respondent Canadian Human Rights Commission.

7.      The Canadian Human Rights Tribunal has adjourned two pending cases before it under section 13 on a sine die basis, until final determination of this case.

8.      In Canadian Jewish Congress v. Makow[2010] C.H.R.D. No. 13 the Tribunal held:

    I have reviewed the submissions of the parties and have concluded that it would be appropriate and would properly serve the interests of justice if this matter was adjourned. While the Supreme Court of Canada has ruled in Canada (Human Rights Commission) v. Taylor, 1990 3 S.C.R. 892 that s. 13 (1) of the CHRA is constitutional, the application now before the Federal Court seeks to bring clarity to this issue in view of the distinct factual and legal context giving rise to this Tribunal’s decision in Agent Y v. Lemire. Clearly Member Hadjis’ decision goes beyond the consideration alone of the penalty provisions in s. 54 of the CHRA, as he chose not to “read out” the penalty provisions and preserve s. 13 of the CHRA. It is now up to the Federal Court to determine the operability of s. 13 of the CHRA. This will achieve the clarity that the Commission has indicated and that I agree is desirable in order to allow the Tribunal to be able to determine this and other cases brought under s. 13 of the CHRA.

    For these reasons I hereby adjourn these proceedings sine die pending the final outcome in the Agent Y v. Lemire case.

9.      A similar ruling was made in Agent X v. Topham[2010] C.H.R.D. No. 14.

ARGUMENT

10.  This  Court is granted the jurisdiction to impose a stay of proceedings pursuant to Rule 50(1)(b) of the Federal Courts Rules which provides:

50. (1) The Federal Court of Appeal or the Federal Court may, in its discretion, stay proceedings in any cause or matter

(a)…

(b) where for any other reason it is in the interest of justice that the proceedings be stayed.

11.  In RJR-MacDonald Inc. v. Canada (Attorney General), [1994] 1 S.C.R. 311, the Supreme Court of Canada set out a three-part test for determining whether a stay should be granted: (1) Whether there is a serious question to be tried; (2) Whether the applicant would suffer irreparable harm if the relief is not granted; and (3) Whether the balance of convenience is in favour of granting the stay.

(a)   Serious question to be tried

12.  It is submitted that the case raises a serious issue to be tried, namely, the constitutionality of  section 13 and ss. 54(1)(a) and (b) of the Canadian Human Rights Act.

13.  The Notice of Appeal raises serious issues with respect to the effect on freedom of speech of section 13, including whether the doctrine of severance was correctly applied by Mr. Justice Mosley and whether section 13 is still a justifiable limitation on Charter rights to free speech under s. 2(b) given its legislative extension in 2001 to the Internet and other computer mediated networks.

(b)   Irreparable harm

14.  If the matter is remitted back to the Tribunal, it can no longer issue a penalty order as the provisions authorizing such an order have been declared unconstitutional by the Federal Court. However, it can issue a cease and desist order against the applicant which is in effect for his lifetime and is a direct violation of his freedom of speech. The order, once made, would remain in effect notwithstanding any subsequent finding in this case that section 13 is unconstitutional.

15.  No damages can compensate the applicant for the loss of his right to free speech under such a cease and desist order.

(c)    Balance of convenience

16.  The article “AIDS Secrets” was voluntarily removed by the applicant in April of 2004 in an effort to settle the complaint, some two weeks after he received notice of the complaint. His remedial actions were ignored by the Canadian Human Rights Commission and the complainant, who instead began a search for other material with which to sustain the complaint. None of those other communications were found to be a violation of the Act.

17.  The public interest is not damaged by a stay of the order of Mr. Justice Mosley since the article found to contravene section 13 is not on the applicant’s website and has not been for almost nine years.  Only 8 persons from Canada looked at the article and probably all of those persons were those involved in the complaint, including the complainant, investigators from the Canadian Human Rights Commission and the applicant himself.

18.  There are presently only two cases pending before the Tribunal, that of Makow and Tophamsupra. Both cases have been adjourned sine die by the Tribunal pending final resolution of the Lemire case in order to obtain clarification of the law. This has been a well-founded caution since the penalty provisions of section 13 were declared unconstitutional.

19.  In the meantime, the House of Commons repealed section 13 and its remedial provisions in section 54 by Bill C-304 on June 6, 2012 to protect freedom of speech. The Bill is now at second reading before the Senate. The House of Commons recognized the threat section 13 posed to the freedoms of Canadians and passed a bill to repeal the law. This factor must play an important role in determining the balance of convenience in granting a stay.

Order Requested

20.  The applicant requests:

(a)    an order staying the judgment of Mr. Justice Mosley in Canadian Human Rights Commission v. Lemire, T-1640-09 pending final determination of the herein appeal;

(b)   Costs of the motion.

 ————————————

Can I count on you to support the cause of freedom and rid Canada of this disgusting though control legislation? My courageous lawyer Barbara Kulaszka and I have demonstrated what two dedicated freedom fighters can accomplish against overwhelming odds. We have single-handedly and doggedly fought the system and exposed the corrupt underbelly of the “Human Rights” Commission’s racket. Nothing ever comes easy when you are fighting such fanatical censors. This case is a seminal one, where the outcome will have serious implications on our right to think and speak freely in this country for generations to come. All Canadians will benefit when we manage to get this shameful law expunged from our legal books.

I cannot carry on this important fight alone. Your donations literally equal the survival of this case. No organizations are assisting with the bill at all.

Please support Marc Lemire’s Constitutional Challenge of Section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act.

Marc Lemire is the only person to beat the CHRC in it’s 33 year history!

Marc Lemire

762 Upper James St

Suite 384

Hamilton, Ontario

L9C 3A2

 

Email:  marc@lemire.com

Web:  http://www.freedomsite.org | http://www.StopSection13.com

Twitter:  @marc_lemire

 

 

B’nai Brith, ADL, Child Porn, Regina and Arthur Topham by Arthur Topham

B’nai Brith, ADL, Child Porn, Regina and Arthur Topham

B’nai Brith, ADL, Child Porn, Regina and Arthur Topham

by 

Arthur Topham

December 17, 2012

From the very beginning of my longstanding legal battle with B’nai Brith Canada and the International Jewish Lobby it has been my intention to point a fierce yet truthful finger at World Jewry: the primary purpose being to bring to the forefront for Canadians the true identity and purpose of these front organizations that the Zionists have set up over the past couple of centuries to deceive the gullible goyim (non-Jews) on multiple levels.

A prime example of how, like clockwork, Zionists inevitably resort to the same tactics over and over, is the recent behaviour by the Crown in my upcoming sec. 319(2) CCC “Hate Crime” case involving B’nai Brith Canada and the RCMP’s Det-Cst Terry Wilson of the “BC HATE CRIME TEAM”.

In my last Legal Update #6 published on December 14, 2012 reference was made to the fact that I would publish an article related to the subject of this incident that took place (again) during my last court appearance on December 13, 2012).

Since the onset of the false allegations brought on by Agent Z and Agent Y of B’nai Brith Canada that led to my arrest on May 16, 2012 the Crown has done its damnedest to portray me in a false and negatively perverse light.

Beginning with my first appearance in the Quesnel court room Crown Council Jennifer Johnston immediately began her vilification of my person by resorting to “case law” (examples from former court cases used as precedents that purported prove similar intent and purpose) that equated the cases referenced by her to my own situation with respect to the articles which I have posted on RadicalPress.com.

The “case” in point here being the Crown’s feeble and malicious attempt to suggest to the presiding Judge that articles published on RadicalPress.com are of the same revulsive caliber as photographs and videos of child pornography and sexual abuse that are illegally posted on the Internet and exchanged between perverts via email and that when it comes to any consideration on the part of the Judge as to the degree and severity of bail conditions that ought to be imposed upon me during the course of this bolshevik show trial that this fallacious argument on Crown’s part ought to be given serious consideration so that I would not be permitted to continue to post anything further on the website or possibly even be permitted to email friends and associates.

This, dear lover of freedom of speech, is the degree of chutzpah (arrogance) and deception which permeates not only the mindset of the Jewish lobbies around the world but also that supposedly impartial, independent and august body within Canada’s judicial system (the Crown) which is currently doing the bidding of this foreign agent of Israel – B’nai Brith Canada.

One of the hallmarks of Zionist thinking is to turn whatever truth exists upon its head and then attempt to portray the actual perpetrator of a crime as the innocent victim and nowhere will you find a better example than in the case of sexual perversion, child pornography, deviancy of all types and the secretive masonic order known to the world as B’nai Brith.

I might add too at this point that it’s a known fact, boldly and unabashedly announced by the perpetrators themselves, that the global porn industry was initiated by and has been controlled by Jews since the very beginning. Anyone doubting this need only type into the Google search engine the aforementioned topic and they will find this simple fact out for themselves.

In my own case because of these false allegations made against my person, my life’s work and Truth itself I will site two precedent setting cases that show both the hypocrisy and the deceit that this purportedly “benevolent Jewish society” has projected upon the public’s perception via their controlled media over the past century.

The first is a recent incident that actually took place at the time when I was battling with the Canadian Human Rights Act’s sec. 13(1) complaint that Agent Z and the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada had filed against me back in 2007.

During the course of that long and protracted exchange of arguments and motions that eventually led to a decision by the Canadian Human Rights Commission to uphold and lend credence to the complaint; one which eventually moved the case into the hands of the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal (another communist/zionist style, quasi-judicial body of appointed Zionists doing the bidding of their taskmasters from Israel) B’nai Brith’s touted moral superiority and unblemished integrity suffered a serious blow when one of their former Canadian directors of B’nai Brith Quebec, Bill Surkis, was arrested and charged on May 29, 2009 with possession of 86 videos containing close to nine hours of footage showing men engaged in sexual abuse of under children between the ages of six and fourteen. On top of the videos were an additional 153 photos also showing children being abused.

To add insult to injury Surkis’s lawyer Steven Slimovich (no pun intended!) at first attempted to convince the Crown that his client had all this porn on his computer for “The purpose of his viewing the child pornography material [in order] to educate himself on the topic of child pornography” so that afterwards he would be able to “go into schools and give lectures on people abusing people.”! That, I suggest, is the sort of chutzpah one continually confronts whenever this touted “benevolent” front organization gets caught with its pants down.

Of course even the Crown in this instance couldn’t pretend to fall for such a scam and they had to prosecute Surkis but given the severity of the charges: all three – possessing, accessing and distributing of child pornography – each carrying a maximum penalty on conviction of 10 years in prison, the final outcome of the trial which included plea bargaining to drop the “distributing child pornography” charge was one that showed the powerful influence of the Jewish lobby when it comes to protecting one of their own.

Out of a total of possibly 30 years imprisonment for the three initial charges what did this former registered lobbyist and Quebec Regional Director of B’nai Brith Canada, board chairman for the Holocaust Memorial Museum and Academic Dean of John Abbott College for 22 years receive as punishment for his crimes?  Why a grand total of 45 days in jail to be served on weekends, the minimum sentencing allowed under the law!

Oi veh is all I can say!

Yet in my own case, where a conviction for a said sec. 319(2) CCC  “Hate Crime” carries a maximum 2 year sentence, do you think that were the Crown to win their case that they would sentence me to say a relatively similar punishment of 5 to 10 days in jail to be served on weekends? Fat chance!

And so it’s fairly evident by now, given Crown Council Jennifer Johnston’s repeated references to Judge Morgan directly associating RadicalPress.com’s articles with child pornography, that her motive is designed to convince the Judge that extremely severe restrictions are justified and must be imposed upon me to prohibit me from writing and publishing any further (pornographic?) articles in my own defence or providing updated information to my long list of supporters and donors who are helping me (and themselves) in this battle to retain my Charter right to freedom of speech on the Internet.

One final irksome comment in this regard. Sturkis’ lawyer Slimovich also did his best to insure that his client, a “stellar” member of his Jewish community, who he stated was a “staunch individual” who “stood up for what is right” would not lose his privilege of retaining his home computer so that he could “continue to serve” his community. Whether he gained that right I was at this point unable to determine.

The second example is one that I will touch upon only briefly but will furnish readers with an url to a website where they can read about it in depth so as to understand the duration of time that has passed since this “benevolent” charity called B’nai Brith that has been fronting as a philanthropy organization for the past hundred years and longer first began their attempts at covering the blood soaked tracks of their membership via the use of their mainstream media propaganda mechanisms using both print and television to gain their dubious ends.

Today the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) of B’nai Brith is the foremost American Jewish watch dog and lobbyist for the state of Israel and for support of the Zionist ideology that buttresses said state’s political doctrines. Its influence in the USA is notoriously well known and its victims are legion since its inception back in the year 1913. The following “case” exposes the history behind why B’nai Brith created the ADL in the first place and it serves as yet another reminder of what this essay is trying to do, i.e. expose B’nai Brith’s true identity and its historic links with pedophelia.

Back in 1913 the United States of America witnessed a rather grizzly murder trial involving a Jew by the name of Leo M. Frank who was the owner of a sweat shop Pencil Company that employed young girls. Leo M. Frank was also president of the Atlanta, Georgia, Gate City [masonic] Lodge 144 Chapter of B’nai B’rith which had about 500 members. The controversy surrounding his sensational trial and subsequent conviction has been ongoing with the ADL still attempting to exonerate the pedophile sex killer as late as 1986.

I highly suggest that readers take a look at the website which exposes all the machinations surrounding this historic trial. It can be found at the following url: http://www.leofrank.org/introduction-to-leo-frank/

I believe these two examples given in this essay are reason enough to challenge Crown Council Jennifer Johnston’s erroneous assertions that she is putting forth in court which suggest that my work and the information contained on RadicalPress.com are somehow related to pedophilia and child pornography when the facts suggest that those who were involved in laying the complaint against me are the ones who ought to be ashamed and embarrassed by the ongoing behaviour of their own members in this highly suspect and shady Jewish lobby organization that is aggressively pursuing its agenda of supporting these so-called “Hate Crimes” in order to silence any criticism of themselves or of the state of Israel and its ideology of Zionism.

I’m sure there will be more to report on this issue as the trial unfolds.

—–

 

Two Gulags: A second warning to the West by Arthur Topham

 

Two Gulags: A second warning to the West

by Arthur Topham

December 11, 2012

“I understand that you love freedom, but in our crowded world you have to pay a tax for freedom.

You cannot love freedom for yourselves alone and quietly agree to a situation where the majority

of  humanity, spread over the greater part of the globe, is subjected to violence and oppression.

“The Communist ideology is to destroy your social order. This has been their aim for 125 years and

it has never changed; only the methods have changed a little….And what is ideological war? It is a

concentration of hatred, a continued repetition of the oath to destroy the Western world.”

~Aleksandr I. Solzhenitsyn, from a Speech given in New York City to the AFL-CIO on July 9, 1975

and contained in his book, Warning to the West.

Permit me to begin this essay by stating that in comparing the case of Arthur Topham and RadicalPress.com versus Regina (the ‘Crown’ aka B’nai Brith Canada) to that of the trials and sufferings of former Nobel Peace prize winner Aleksandr I. Solzhenitsyn, I am fully aware that it will naturally be construed by some readers as little more than hyperbole on the part of the writer. Nonetheless there are a number of historic lay lines connecting the two situations which need identification in the hope that others will see and understand the systematic progression and transformation of this climacteric element of tyranny that’s been stalking the global landscape since the successful Bolshevik coup of 1917 in Russia.

First I would like to add to Solzhenitsyn’s words where he states that Communism’s ideology aim has not changed from the start, only the “methods” have. This simple statement, for those of my generation and later generations, is indispensable when attempting to comprehend how the ideology itself has managed to retain its essential character even after the downfall in 1989 of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR).

Key to visualizing the doctrinal strands of the Communist ideology and their continual ability to unobtrusively weave themselves in and out of the ever-changing warp and woof of day to day history is the possession of a fundamental awareness that today’s political ideology, Zionism, is precisely the same ideology that first gave birth to its historic pedigree – Marxism in the mid-19th Century its founding and funding has, from day one, flowed from the same source.

Today, those who have been paying attention to the details in the Zionist script for the creation of a one world totalitarian dictatorship understand that there is a direct connection between the House of Rothschild, the political ideology known Zionism and the premeditated, deliberate, illegal creation of the state of Israel by the United Nations back in 1948. These ideas thrash about like a load of dirty underwear in an automatic washer on most alternative blogs dealing with political issues as well as in a myriad number of posts on Facebook and other internet forums and venues. So many viewers have peered through that revolving window that now (as compared to even a decade ago when the Internet was in its nascent beginnings) the Rothschild = Zionism = Israel connection is a done deal and recognized as fact. But what is not fully understood yet by this vast number of viewers is the underlying, direct relationship between Communism and Zionism, without which the world will continue to disconnect the two apparently differing ideologies and fail to grasp the crucial historic continuity of this longstanding conspiracy; one meant to destroy the West and bring to fruition the ultimate goal of the Communist creed – world slavery under an all powerful Rothschild oligarchy.

The genius that was Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn knew his enemy well enough that he was able, upon finally having his eleven year sentence in the Soviet gulag annulled in April of 1956, to actually have his first novel, One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich, published in Krushchev’s soviet union in 1962. His earlier works that included The First Circle and Cancer Ward were first published in English in 1968 and by 1970 had earned him the Nobel Prize for literature. It wasn’t until 1974 though that Solzhenitsyn was finally arrested again and expelled from the Soviet Union after a copy of his Gulag was seized by the KGB in December of 1973. He first moved to West Germany and then to Vermont in the USA where he remained until returning permanently to Russia in 1994.

Solzhenitsyn’s classic work The Gulag Archipelago was first published in English and French in June of 1974 and remains the literary lynchpin holding together the ultimate hidden knowledge regarding the cogent connection between Marxism, the supposed “Russian” Revolution, Communism, Bolshevism and Zionism and their direct tie to the Rothschild oligarchy alluded to earlier.

Solzhenitsyn was able to accomplish this monumental feat of delivering to the West the evidence merely by omission. His trilogy of terror (the Gulag), which outlines the subsequent premeditated, calculated mass genocide of approximately 66 million Russians, mostly of Christian denomination, from the coup of 1917 up until Krushchev was deposed in 1964, will stand forever as the single most important work ever written on the actualizing and unfolding of Zionism’s essential tenets in a real life situation where a vast nation fell under the full control and domination of its ideological proponents.

He was able to have it published and promoted in the West by simply omitting to identify the vast majority of all the key players in his epic drama of demonic destruction as being of Ashkenazi Jewish origins. In this way he avoided the West’s Zionist press that controls all the major publishing houses throughout Europe and North America who, had he pin-pointed the true ethnic identity of the rogues and criminals and sadistic, psychopathic killers who were directly responsible for this mass murder of the Russian people (including all of Tzar Nicholas II’s family and even the family dog!), would have outright shunned him and his work and in all likelihood initiated a smear campaign against him that would have included all the same tactics now being employed by the Zionist controlled media here in Canada to attack my own person and my website RadicalPress.com.

Upon his return to the Russian republic in the mid 1990’s Solzhenitsyn resumed work on another two volume set of books entitled Two Hundred Years Together, the history of the Jews in Russia. The first volume was called Russian Jewish History 1795-1916 and when published created such a stink within Zionist circles that when volume two, The Jews in the Soviet Union came out in Russia the West was then on to him and the book was never published in the English language and still remains censored by the Jewish media to this day, a prime example of the power of the Zionist media to cover up their endless crimes against humanity.

Fortunately the German Revisionist Udo Walendy was able to procure copies and translate the book into German and from there an English translation of segments of the overall work made it to the West and were published by the Barnes Review in their September-October 2008 edition of their magazine. While not a complete version of the text the edition in question covers the issue of the major players in the gulag drama and identifies all those who were of Jewish origin, more than sufficient to firmly establish that the ‘Russian Revolution’ was in truth little more than an incredible take-over of a nation by Zionist forces funded in full measure by the Rothschild banking cartel.

When Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn was travelling around the United States back in 1975 speaking to different groups about his experiences in the Soviet concentrations camps during the late 40’s and early 50’s he kept emphasizing the perennial problem of trying to convey to people the imminent danger that Communism (aka Zionism) posed to the Western democracies. During one such talk he asked, “Is it possible or impossible to transmit the experience of those who have suffered to those who have yet to suffer? Can one part of humanity learn from the bitter experience of another or can it not? Is it possible or impossible to warn someone of danger?” He then capped off his questings by firmly stating, “It can happen. It is possible. As a Russian proverb says: ‘When it happens to you, you’ll know it’s true.’

Speaking for myself as a writer and publisher here in Canada I too can say that when you attempt to expose the true identity of those who continually strive to remain hidden behind the outer show curtain of unfolding political events while at the same time are controlling the actions of politicians and the mainstream media and all levels of the legal system via their influential lobby groups and advisers and sayanim who have infiltrated every stratum of Canada’s cultural, social, legal, economic, governmental and corporate levels, then you will undoubtedly be attacked in their media and accused by their pressure groups such as B’nai Brith Canada of being an “anti-Semite” and a “hate monger” and “racist” and then, based upon said accusations, arrested by their complicit police agents working for the “Crown” (but another name for the representative of the City of London in England owned by the same Rothschild oligarchy that owns everything else of importance in the world today) and thrown into jail and your constitutional rights taken away from you before you even begin to approach a courtroom in order to challenge their illegal, immoral actions.

Such is the current state of affairs in Canada today whether those in denial of this fact and the complacent and lazy and otherwise too busy to notice portions of society are willing to admit this or not.

Solzhenitsyn once remarked that the very essence of Communism/Zionism was quite beyond the scope of human understanding and that for so many average, normal, moral, decent people living in the West it was just too much of a stretch of their imagination to picture the real and dreadful, vile and disgusting actions committed by these ideologically and spiritually crippled people who have plundered and pillaged and raped and destroyed untold millions of souls in their quest to gain total control of the world.

I could go on with quote after quote from Solzhenitsyn warning to those in the West of the subtle dangers that are working ceaselessly everywhere to drag down unsuspecting nations into the mire of atheistic perversions and immoral mental and spiritual torpor and confusion thus making them incapable of realizing that their rights and freedoms are being terminated until it is too late. Ultimately he says it becomes incumbent upon the individual to reject the Zionist ideology in favour of simply being a human being. In his words, “Such a rejection is more than a political act. It is a protest of our souls against those who would have us forget the concepts of good and evil.”

Thirty seven years have now passed since Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn travelled throughout the USA  warning the nation of the impending dangers of Communism/Zionism and imploring the people to wake up and take heed of what he was telling them based upon his own first hand experience. Did the American people hear his words and did they understand? Did they do anything to forestall what was then the beginning of the shift from Communism to what we now call Zionism? Judging from all appearances Solzhenitsyn’s words fell on deaf ears or at least ears already stopped up by the din and blare of the Zionist media that had, for decades, already been pumping their minds full of Zionist propaganda.

Today that same danger has grown even more powerful and openly threatening. It was first openly declared by Douglas Reed back in 1956 in his monumental classic The Controversy of Zion and then enunciated with greater emphasis and detail in 1975 by gulag survivor Solzhenitsyn in his equally eloquent 3-volume trilogy The Gulag Archipelago and still the mass of citizenry continue to think and act as if this threat to their very existence doesn’t exist other than in the imaginations and fantasies of “conspiracy theorists” and Internet fringe dwellers.

And so this very question arises once again with respect to my own trials and tribulations. For years now I have been researching and publishing information that corroborates all that these great forerunners like Reed and Solzhenitsyn have revealed to the world about the supreme danger that lies hidden within the Zionist ideology. Five years ago my website came up on the Zionist’s radar screen and they decided to do whatever it would take to demonize me and have my website removed from the Internet. That is why they created the so-called “HATE CRIME” laws which were insinuated over time into Canada’s legal system via their lobbyist influence, their infiltration of the Supreme Court of Canada (four out of nine SCC Justices are now Zionist Jews) and their behind the scenes control of all of Canada’s active political parties and their leaders via non-elected ‘advisers’.

Will my warning to Canada and the rest of the world also go unheeded like those before me who had the foresight and courage to risk their very lives to bring to light this dark and menacing evil that is slowly overshadowing the lives of people around the globe as well as the very planet upon which we all must live? Will Canadians listen and begin to stand up and speak out without fear? Will they lend their support to my struggle to defeat this sec. 319(2) “Hate” law and protest over the manner in which I am being treated as a Canadian citizen? Or will they stand by in silence, apathy and paranoia watching while the Zionist forces within their nation force yet another writer and researcher to take down his website and cease from telling the truth about what is happening to his country?

It is not just Arthur Topham who will be on trial in the days ahead but every Canadian who values their right to freedom of speech.

——–

 

Re: Who are the Human Rights heroes? by Arthur Topham

newRPlogo

December 7, 2012

PhotobucketPhotobucket

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Alex,

Thank you for sending out your message regarding “Who are the Human Rights heroes?”. It is both apt and timely that we continue to recognize those who are working hard in the trenches and the front lines doing their utmost to ensure that future generations will at some point be able to live in dignity, peace, freedom and justice.

And while I applaud your efforts to bring to the attention of people everywhere the sacrifices and plight of good, decent, dedicated people like Gao Zhisheng and Yolanda Oqueili who have given their blood and their courage in the struggle for human rights I also believe rather fervently that you should not at the same time overlook those within Canada who are also giving their all to ensure that these very same rights are not trampled into the dust of deception and tyranny.

Photobucket

 

Photobucket

While I am not one to normally toot my own horn in this sense I find it just a bit unsettling to see how Amnesty International invariably goes elsewhere in its quest for fine examples of activists who are fighting for human dignity, leaving those of us here at home who are doing their utmost to bring forth these same principles to stand alone upon the battlefield.

Without the freedom and ability to speak the truth regarding the decimation of human rights here in Canada, the USA and throughout the Western world, all of your efforts to save those outside the ken of these supposed bastions of freedom and democracy will surely be for naught.

Today Canadians are in the midst of a decisive battle to retain their right to freedom of speech on the Internet; a right that is critically fundamental if the western world is to address the root causes of those issues and concerns that are affecting the whole of the global community, including the rights of Gao Zhisheng and Yolanda Oqueili and countless others.

In this regard I would therefore propose that you also shine your well-deserved attention and light upon those activists within the boundaries of the west and accent and highlight for all to see, the urgency of upholding this one sacred, universal right that the world cannot do without if it is to ever regain a balance of peace, harmony and justice; the right to express without fear of government intervention and repression, the thoughts, ideas and opinions on the root causes of injustice; conceptions that will ultimately afford us all the freedom to live in peace and dignity.

I believe that my own case here in Canada is one that should be supported by your organization and I invite you to take a closer look at it by visiting my website www.radicalpress.com and also by contacting me for all the details surrounding my struggle in this regard.

If anyone here in Canada is an “Individual at Risk” it is surely I.

For human rights, justice and freedom of speech on the Internet I remain,

Sincerely,

 

Arthur Topham

Pub/Ed

RadicalPress.com

“Digging to the root of the issues since 1998?

 

Spingola/ZionCrimeFactory Interview: Discussions on ZFC’s New Book, Zionism & Arthur Topham

Photobucket

 

Photobucket

 

Click HERE to listen to Interview

[Editor’s Note: On behalf of RadicalPress.com I would like to take this opportunity to express my most sincere thanks to both Deanna Spingola and her Guest Zander C. Fuerza of ZionistCrimeFactory.com for adding my legal case with B’nai Brith Canada to their discussions on the Jewish Supremacist agenda for global destruction and world slavery.

Zander is an erudite speaker and dedicated researcher who is in the final stages of completing a book dealing with the very issues discussed in this interesting interview.

The fact that he has dedicated so much of the discussion to my battle with the Jewish lobbyists and their censorship plans for Canada is a genuine indication that the issue of  Freedom of Speech on the Internet is one that spans borders and is as vital a concern to citizens of the USA as well as Canada.

Please pass this interview on to other concerned citizens everywhere.]

———-

Hello,

I interviewed Zander C. Fuerza (ZCF) today, December 6, 2012. You may hear this interview by visiting this web site:

http://www.spingola.com/SpingolaSpecials.html

Thanks for your interest in my programs.

Kindest Regards,

Deanna

My radio program: Monday-Friday, 11 am to 1 pm (CT)

www.republicbroadcasting.org

My radio schedule: http://www.spingola.com/radio_schedule.html

Spingola Specials – commercial-free interviews

 My Books:

The Ruling Elite, a Study in Imperialism, Genocide and Emancipation 

The Ruling Elite, the Zionist Seizure of World Power 

(both available at Amazon, www.spingola.com and other retailers)

Mr. Bean champions Freedom of Speech in British video

 

Rowan Atkinson: “The strongest weapon against hateful speech is not repression but more speech.”

Edward Abbey: “The best cure for the ills of democracy is more democracy.”

 

Mr.BeanFreeSpeech

Click HERE to view video.

News Update from Jim Townsend

JimTNewsUpdate

Arthur my friend,

Here is the letter I have just written to the registrar of the Supreme Court. You may want to publish this and send it around as a legal update and show people that how you are being treated is how anyone that stands up for our country is treated.

I am in Vernon Court on Dec. 5, 2012 to be sentenced even though I have PROVEN MY INNOCENCE and all charges have been dropped AND I have already been unlawfully imprisoned for six months and this illegal bail condition was dropped. Now I am to be sentenced for it? It is time ‘our servants’ faced a people’s court.

Do you still have my book Freedom Canada that I wrote when I was president of the Alberta Party? Read what I wrote about the Star Chamber Courts and why the Habeus Corpus Act was enacted in the first place. This is not the first time in history that Crown Courts have used their sacred trust to swindle the people they ‘serve’.

much love,

Jimi
—–

Dear Mr. Bilodeau; December 1, 2012

Photobucket

I did receive your voice message you left on my telephone. You asked what had changed since I made an application in June.

What has changed is that I have proven my innocence and the malicious charges that the RCMP laid in order to cover up the theft of our mining claim, the attempt to murder our family, the theft of our disability cheque and to aid and abet their own crimes; have all been dismissed. There are no charges that I am facing that would warrant me being on bail. This is simply another abuse of process and a denial of my right to due process.

As a consequence, I again applied to the Supreme Court of British Columbia to hear my writ of Habeus Corpus to release me from bail detention. This was heard in the Supreme Court of British Columbia on November 2, 2012 and it is why I am now appealing this decision to your court. I asked the judge to dismiss the bail because I have proven my innocence and the charges have all been dropped. The Crown argued that since there were no charges against me, there was nothing to support a Habeus Corpus hearing. This is an erroneous argument and in dismissing my application and maintaining bail conditions against me, the Judge made an error in law.

Bail is to legally constrain people who are up on charges. A Habeus Corpus hearing is to determine whether a detention is lawful. This brands the contention that there is nothing to support a Habeus Corpus hearing a reductio ad absurdum. If one examines the bail conditions we find that one of the conditions that is left is that I can not talk about the Crown Agents that laid the malicious charges against me in the first place. Why? Since the charges are no longer outstanding and I have proven my innocence it is clear the only reason for the bail is to keep me from talking about the people that have abused their authority and unlawfully used the courts to cover up their crimes and attack me. This is aiding and abetting the crimes that were committed against us.

Further, even though the charges are all dropped the Crown still seeks to sentence me for a bail violation. One of the conditions of my bail was that I not access the internet. This condition was never justified by Crown, they merely asked for a long list of onerous conditions and were granted them carte blanche. Believing they had me at their absolute mercy, CRA Crown Agents then unlawfully seized our disability cheque. This is a crime called theft. They have no authority to seize a disability cheque.

Since the Crown merely laid malicious charges against me when we went to them for help, I once again used the internet to make a video about CRA unlawfully stealing my disability cheque. For this I was seized and thrown into prison for six months. In June I finally managed to get a Writ of Habeus Corpus before the court because the bail condition to stay off the internet was not only never justified but it was a violation of my Charter Right to Freedom of Speech.

The Crown agreed that the bail condition violated my Charter Right to Freedom of Speech and released me from unlawful imprisonment and removed the unlawful condition from my bail. They contended at that time that since I still had charges against me that the bail should remain. However, since then, the charges have all been dismissed and now the only thing that is remaining is the Crown still wants to sentence me for the violating the bail condition even though it was unlawful in the first place. This is another reductio ad absurdum.

The bail condition was a crime against me. It was a violation of my Charter Right to Freedom of Speech. The six month jail term was a crime against me. It was an unlawful incarceration. Crown Prosecutor Iain Currie tried to rectify the situation by removing the bail condition, releasing me from prison and finally dropping all the phoney charges. In spite of this, the Judge that abused his authority to aid and abet these crimes still wants to sentence me?

What it all boils down to is that all of my Charter Rights have been used as toilet paper by this judge who is supposed to be upholding the law. Either the Charter applies to me as well, or it applies to nobody in our society and judges have carte blanche to destroy our lives at will. This is Justice? Either I have the Charter Right to Freedom of Speech and the Criminal Code Right to publish the crimes that Crown Agents abuse their authority to commit or I am a slave. Slavery is a Crime Against Humanity. This is a fundamental case Mr. Bilodeau. Either we Canadians have the right to say something when Crown Agents commit crimes against us or we are absolute slaves with no rights whatsoever.

It should be noted that you people call yourself the Justice Department. It is obvious then that your industry is marketing your services to provide Justice to your fellow countrymen. One wonders then why they see Justice Blindfolded on a poster upon entering the court to get Justice. Is this a symbolic way of communicating that the courts are nothing more than a constructive fraud? That we will not be getting Justice in these courts?

Mr. Bilodeau, I am sick of criminals in the government hiding behind the courts to attack us. What you are facing right now is the righteous indignation of one of your fellow countrymen that has been force fed humble pie to JUSTIFY the crimes committed against us by Crown Agents. After years of abuse and the total destruction of our lives the Crown has now unlawfully imprisoned me and still want to sentence me after violating my rights. I have had enough. I would ask that you please schedule a hearing for my application to your court. Though lawyers might get quite a kick out of blindfolding Justice and using her to play pin the tail on the donkey with their victims, the rest of your society does not pay you people for Justice so that you can use our own courts to victimize us. The foreign owned Crown contributes nothing to our society. We Canadians pay our own way. We Canadians pay you people to provide us with a service called Justice. It is your lawful duty to ensure we have exactly that.

Crown Agents that incarcerated me illegally and arrested me unlawfully claimed they were only doing their jobs and following orders from their higher ups. Mr. Bilodeau, their ‘higher ups’ as the cop that harassed us from our mining claim calls them, do not have the right to commit crimes against their fellow countrymen and just because their ‘higher ups’ order them to, does not mean they have the rights to abuse their office, violate their oaths and commit crimes against their fellow countrymen.

It has been said Mr. Bilodeau, and argued quite compellingly, that you are entirely corrupt and regularly abuse your authority to deny Justice to your fellow countrymen by covering up for the criminal behaviour of others in the ‘Justice’ Department. These are online at http://www.waterwarcrimes.com/4/post/2012/11/criminal-activityat-supreme-curt-of-canada-spotlight-on-registrar-rogerbilodeau.html and http://rogerbilodeau.blogspot.ca/     Most interesting insider information on ‘our’ civil servants.

I have studied all of the rules and know that I am doing exactly as the criminal code explains. I knew before I went to the Supreme Court of BC that I could appeal their decision to the Supreme Court of Canada. I have been compelled to court and maliciously prosecuted over FIFTY TIMES! And yet still proved myself innocent. If you would like me to make a Youtube video of all that is going on, to post my appeal to your court on my website on the internet and to appeal to you with an online petition for all the world to see, I can do that. I am sure that is an effort that neither one of us needs but we both know that I am willing to do whatever it takes to get Justice. You are Canadian and I am Canadian and the Right to Freedom of Speech is something I am sure you do not want to lose either. Please honour your oath and your office and schedule a Habeus Corpus hearing for me. I seek nothing but Justice and ‘your job’ is to provide me the venue to do so.

With much love and hope for the future,

I remain your fellow countryman

Harry James Townsend

RadicalPress Legal Update #5

NewLegalUpdateLogo 700

notice4RP

Dear Free Speech Supporters,

On Tuesday, November 27, 2012 my wife and I once again wended our way into Quesnel to attend what I thought was to be a meeting with a Justice of the Peace who was going to speak with my lawyer Douglas Christie via telephone at 1:30 pm and arrange dates for an arraignment and a preliminary hearing regarding the sec. 319(2) criminal charge of “Willful promotion of hatred against an identifiable group, people of the Jewish religion or ethnic origin” brought against me by B’nai Brith Canada via their two agents X and Y. That was what the JP stated during the previous meeting held on November 20, 2012.

Just prior to 1:30 pm the Justice came and told us that the meeting would be held in Judge’s Court instead at the same time.

When I was called up before the Honourable Judge Morgan the court clerk called Mr. Christie on the phone and upon answering Judge Morgan began to discuss the dates for the two issue and it was agreed upon that the arraignment would take place on April 2, 2013 at 1:30 pm and that preliminary inquiry would be set for the week of June 3 – 6, 2013.

Initially my lawyer had requested five days for the preliminary inquiry but for some reason unbeknownst to anyone present it was set for only four. Mr. Christie stated that he didn’t feel four days might be enough and given the fact that he was still awaiting disclosure from Crown Council Johnston of the relevant documents supporting the Crown’s reasons for the charge after a delay of over six months he felt that it was unreasonable to expect him to be able to ascertain the amount of time that might be required. That said the Judge still left it at four days.

Then the issue of the application to address bail conditions came up again. Crown council Jennifer Johnston told the Judge in no uncertain terms that the Crown was going to be pressing to have all of the original bail conditions reinstated when the bail hearing took place citing the “fact” that Det. Wilson had informed her that I was still posting articles on my website that Wilson deemed to be of the same calibre as those complained of by Agents X and Y.

The previous undertaking given to a judge which I am presently bound by came into effect on October 13, 2012 and did not include the following two conditions which were originally given to me by Det-Cst Terry Wilson back on May 16, 2012 when I was released from the Quesnel jail. At the time of my release I did not sign the document but that didn’t matter to the Crown who insist that it still is in effect.

These two conditions (and possibly more planned) are:

1. “You shall not post any information on any internet website that can be read by members of the general public.”

2. “You shall not operate, post to or manage or allow anyone to operate, post to or manage any internet site owned by you that can be accessed by the general public.”

It must of course be recognized that both of these Orwellian ultimatums fly in the face of my Charter of Rights and Freedoms as guaranteed by Canada’s so-called “Constitution.” This fact also appears not to have entered into the mind of Crown Council Jennifer Johnston.

Mr. Christie’s response to all this was that he finds it extremely difficult for him to argue against the Crown’s position when he is still waiting for the disclosure of the documents that would indicate the reasons why the Crown was taking such a hard line approach in defiance of my constitutional rights.

This of course brought up the subject of said disclosure materials which Crown Council had assured both Judge Morgan and Counsel Christie that she would be supplying Mr. Christie with when we last attended court on the 20th of November. That information, apparently on cd discs, never arrived at Mr. Christie’s office prior to November 27th.

Judge Morgan asked the Crown what the problem was stating that he thought the Crown had had sufficient time to get this matter together.

Crown Council Johnston then gave the Judge a swan song about how she really, really wanted to get it done but that she was just so busy and then launched into all the things that she had on her plate that prevented her from accomplishing what she had said she would do last time we met in court. She then added that the material on the cd’s had to be “vetted” prior to sending them to Mr. Christie and that there were so many pages that had to be gone over and examined and it was soooo important that the accused not be privy to these documents before they were vetted and so on and so forth.

When it came time for setting a date for the next bail application to be heard there was no agreement between either Crown Council or Mr. Christie as to when they would be able to meet and so Judge Morgan decided that he would set a date and that both parties would have to make sure they were in attendance. At this point Judge Morgan also told Mr. Christie that this would likely be the last time he would be permitted to attend via telephone and that after that he would need to appear in person. The date was then set for Thursday, December 13, 2012 at 1:30 pm and the allotted time for Mr. Christie to argue against the Crown’s proposed conditions would be 45 minutes.

That said Mr. Christie then asked the Judge if he would ensure that the Crown furnish him with all the documentation required so that he would have time to prepare his arguments and Crown Council immediately said that she would get the information to Mr. Christie well in advance of the 13th of December. Judge Morgan then stated that Crown would have to furnish Mr. Christie with the information by no later than December 11, 2012. Hardly sufficient time in which to prepare a proper argument especially in light of the fact that Crown most likely was going to argue that all of my posts on RadicalPress.com since November 2nd, 2012 were indicative of more “hatred” being published against the ‘victims’ of this alleged “hate” crime.

That ended the session.

Some final comments:

It has been over six months now since Det-Cst Terry Wilson and his “BC HATE CRIME TEAM” swooped down upon my wife and I while we were travelling up to Prince George, B.C. in order to arrest me on this bogus charge, outraging me and traumatizing my dear wife. All the drama and hoopla surrounding Hate Hunter Wilson’s premeditated assault upon my constitutional right to freedom of speech on the Internet was simply that – a staged performance designed to lend some form of legitimacy and authenticity to what was simply an attack by the state upon an otherwise law-abiding citizen; one who has been openly informing the public about the very foreign agents who were responsible for making the complaint to the RCMP that precipitated this subsequent ambush on my legal and human right to freedom of speech and freedom of expression.

Yet, for all the hullabaloo and the gravity of this said “hate crime” – one based solely upon the contents of my website RadicalPress.com – the Crown still refuses to supply my defence lawyer Douglas Christie with the required disclosure documents that they apparently used to determine that such a charge was justified.

Instead, they used this bogus allegation to justify obtaining an illegal search warrant which was then used to invade my home and steal all of my computers and electronic files. And, in addition to that, they also stole my firearms (my only means of personal safety in the rural area where I live) and then had the audacity to add a further bogus charge of “unlawful storage of firearms” to the initial false charge. All this was of course done in order to furnish their controlled media with yet another juicy bit of misinformation that could then be used to smear and slander my person and give the impression that I was not only a vile hate-mongerer but also armed and dangerous!

The whole gist of this massive scam is to cover up the fact that the Jewish lobbies here in Canada have the judiciary and the RCMP and the media by the balls and whenever they wish to silence someone who is revealing this fact to the people of Canada all they have to do is put the squeeze on RCMP Hate Hunters like Det-Cst Wilson and Levas and the legal system suddenly kicks in to carry out the bidding of their task masters the Zionist lobby acting at the behest of its controlling arm B’nai Brith International. The perps in this charade then sit back and let the taxpayers of Canada pay all the expenses while I, a senior citizen on a very limited, fixed income, am forced to defend myself against this specious, anti-Charter of Rights charge.

Must be nice to have that sort of influence upon a nation that purports to be “free and democratic.”

One final note regarding my website.

Suspended

Readers were informed that my website host Netfirms.com has issued a decree at the behest of a complaint from Hate Hunter Wilson that my website would be “terminated” in 48 hours unless I removed all the supposed “hate” content alleged by Wilson to be on the site.

Upon receiving said notification I replied to the Corporate representative for Netfirms.com, a person going by the name of “Zach P”, requesting further information as to what exactly I was expected to remove in order to meet Netfirms.com policy rules. I also requested of my readership that they write to Zach P and let him know that they did not agree with Hate Hunter Wilson’s assessment of my website and that Netfirms.com ought to leave it alone. All of these efforts of course proved to be futile. Zach P never had the decency to even respond to anyone, a clear indication that he and his company Netfirms.com could give a shit about what Canadians think and feel about the issue of freedom of speech on the Internet.

Realizing that I had but 48 hours to save my site I had it moved to a different server and now it is still alive and functioning but for how long is anyone’s guess.

The fact that Hate Hunter Wilson has been sleuthing about behind the scenes doing his damnedest to destroy my website speaks volumes in terms of the underhanded tactics that these supposed ” ‘Royal Canadian’ peace officers” will resort to in order to due the bidding of their foreign controllers. My lawyer tells me that even though Hate Hunter Wilson’s tactics are unethical and immoral and deplorable they still are not illegal and so there’s nothing that I can do about it. I’ll leave readers to judge whether or not H.H. Wilson’s actions ought to be allowed.

And  so it goes as the wheels of justice here in Canuckistan slowly grind away and erode my rights and freedoms along with yours.

Again I would ask of readers that they assist me financially in my battle with the censors by sending donations to the cause. Due to the fact that the Crown is refusing to give the required disclosure to my lawyer I am not able to furnish legal aid with the required documents that they demand before looking at whether or not I might qualify for legal financial assistance. This leaves me in the unenviable position of having to rely solely upon donations to pay for my legal expenses and while I have been receiving some assistance from a few kind souls who realize the importance of this case to all Canadians the amount of money thus sent comes nowhere near that necessary to pay for my lawyer to appear in court in Quesnel to defend me against these false charges.

As such I would once again implore readers to give serious consideration to helping me out by either sending a donation via PayPal using either a PayPal account or a credit card or else sending a cheque or Money Order to me via snail mail at the following postal address. Cash of course also works.

Arthur Topham
4633 Barkerville Highway
Quesnel, B.C.
Canada
V2J 6T8

To access my PayPal button please go to my blog http://www.quesnelcariboosentinel.com The button is up on the right hand corner of the Home Page.

Thanks for all the support from those good folks who had the courage of their convictions to write a letter to Netfirms.com on my behalf. While these excellent letters may have had no effect upon the corporate heads at Netfirms.com they certainly provide a strong and positive endorsement for both myself and RadicalPress.com and for that reason alone they are gratefully received and acknowledged.

For Peace and Love and Truth and Justice for All,

I remain,

Sincerely,

Arthur Topham
Pub/Ed
RadicalPress.com
“Digging to the root of the issues since 1998”

Ashkenazi European Zionist Jews don’t speak for ALL Jews – Shazer Everquar

Photobucket

http://shazereverquar.wordpress.com/antisemitic/antisemitism-card/

[EDITOR’S NOTE:  I received a copy of the following email from Shazer Everquar of Harrison, Arkansas USA yesterday. In his letter to Netfirm.com’s corporate axeman Zach P he not only tears a strip off ‘Det’ Terry Wilson of the ‘BC HATE CRIME TEAM’ but also includes a very interesting short video that highlights another aspect of the racist, supremacist mindset of those Zionist Jews who control not only Israel but the majority of Western governments via their behind-the-scenes ‘advisers’ and lobbyists like B’nai Brith Canada.

In further communications with Shazer Everquar I learned a bit more about his side of the story when it comes to America’s Zionist attack dog, the ADL or Anti-Defamation League, which is but one more tentacle protruding forth from the main body known as B’nai Brith International which is the creation of the Rothschild criminal cartel now attacking freedom of speech globally through their implanted “hate laws”.
Do take the time to watch this video as it illustrates a good point; one that most of us have never contemplated.]
———————-
Dear NetFirms (Zach P),

I am a former customer and once had the site, thinkmasa.org which was hosted by you.

As an African-American, I am particularly outraged at the racist tactics of the bigot known as Det-Cst Terry Wilson.  It is a FACT that White Jews are responsible for the Atlantic SLAVE trade and are SO racist that they even call BLACK JEWS “anti-semites!”??

The fact that this so-called “detective” is supporting a PROVEN RACIST PROVOCATION ORGANIZATION reveals that such an “investigation” is highly suspect.

Click the above link and watch for yourself the video which PROVES these guys are quite corrupt.

If White Jews are allowed to attack Black Jews in the name of “anti-semitism” then where will it end ????  Surely a Gentile doesn’t stand a chance under those conditions.??Please be fair and take a good look at ALL the facts.

Thank you.

Sincerely,

Shazer Everquar

Harrison, Arkansas USA
——————————
Further comments from a subsequent communication with Shazer Everquar:

Dear Editor:

I had to write because, as you noticed, that video was tailor-made for your case.

About NetFirms.com:  I went with them because I wanted to be hosted outside of the US.  But as my email suggests, eventually I moved my blog to another company (Blue Host).  Suddenly, I was getting all sorts of tech help that I never got from NetFirms.com.  I didn’t realize how lousy they were until I left them.

So what you’re saying about them not responding is just a continuation of the fact that they don’t respond to ANYTHING.  They just collect your money.

If you’re not required to host in Canada, consider moving your blog to another country such as the Netherlands or better yet, the Isle of Man.  Then the Canadian ADL won’t be able to touch you.

I’m sympathetic to your cause.  January 13th, 2012 I was released from over 16 months of incarceration without a trial by Zionist Jews.  When I was set free they went through my wallet and took my social security card and my driver’s license.

While I was incarcerated all of my belongings were stolen.  I mean ALL.  Car, clothes, everything.  My best and only friend has been supporting me out of his own pocket for nearly a year because one cannot get a job without ID.

While I was incarcerated, a Zionist judge wrote an order that I was not to have access to the internet “for any purpose”!

I know from personal experience how the Jews terrorize those who oppose their quest for world domination.

I’m writing this to you at a library, which is my only source to the internet.  My last blog, “thinkmasa.org” went down while I was incarcerated.

The Zionists taught me that what they hated the most was my blog.  So until I’m able to get an ID and raise money, I’m hosted on wordpress.com.  If I’m arrested and jailed, the blog stays up.

The Jews blacklisted me and no lawyer would represent me.  It was actually a blessing in disguise.  I would help you but I don’t know how Canada works.  However you can find out and it will be well worth it.

My new blog is not very developed since it’s only been around since June of this year and I’m only able to work on it from libraries, (I.E. a max of 7 hours a day).

I’m amazed to see that most of the so-called anti-zionist websites are actually run by the Zionists.  The blatant anti-zionist sites are either run by Jews or racists bankrolled by Jews.  It’s very clever actually.  You gotta give these monsters credit.

The conscious and unconscious Christian Zionists are the lynchpin.  Unseat the Zionist hold on the Christian mentality and the whole house of cards will come tumbling down.

Keep Fighting, we’re winning!

Shazer Everquar

Letters sent to Netfirms.com in Support of RadicalPress.com

Objection!

Dear Reader,

Enclosed below are letters sent to Zach P at Netfirms.com requesting that they do not remove my website in 48 hours as they have threatened to do.

These letters are well written and heartfelt and I’m absolutely humbled by them.

Whether or not Zach P of Netfirms.com will get an opportunity to read them before they pull the pin on RadicalPress is anyone’s guess.

What a sorry state of affairs as gutless and weak-willed traitors to this nation like Det-Cst Terry Wilson begin to reveal their true colours.

Thanks again to ALL those fine and decent people who have committed to supporting my work.

Bless you one and all!

Sincerely,

Arthur Topham
Pub/Ed
RadicalPress.com
“Digging to the root of the issues since 1998”

——————————————————–

LETTERS TO ZACH P REGARDING NETFIRMS.COM ULTIMATUM TO TERMINATE RADICALPRESS.COM WITHIN 48 HOURS

Dear Zach P:

I do not feel RadicalPress.com is promoting any “hatred propaganda,” at all.  What Arthur Topham is doing in his online newsletter is providing a rare news service, one you’re not likely to find on the usual TV programs available in Canada due to the fact Canada’s news programs are controlled by B’nai Brith and other Jewish interests.

I do want to see the RadicalPress.com website remain on the Internet since what it contains is verifiable and factual news.

Please do not listen to the vicious and biased propagandists who are seeking to destroy businesses, livelihoods, news, and political awareness for the sake of — nothing worthwhile, that is for damned sure.  Liberty to all Canadians and Americans!

Best regards,

Charles Steiner

————–

Dear Zach,

This short note is to let you know that I am a regular reader of Arthur Topham’s blog website radicalpress.com hosted by your company Netfirms, and link to it from my own blog mysteryworshipers.wordpress.com .

I do not consider for a moment that radicalpress.com promotes “hate propaganda”. At no time has radicalpress.com encouraged its readers to kill, maim, or destroy other peoples or countries, things governments do fairly frequently (Libya and Gaza come to mind).

I would ask that you continue to promote freedom of speech in Canada by allowing radicalpress.com to continue with its blog. I feel that pulling radicalpress.com off the internet would be no different than the actions taken by authoritarian countries such as Saudi Arabia. And Canada claims to be a bastion of freedom of speech. Let’s keep free speech alive with your help! Thanks for your time.

Sincerely,

David Morgan

——————-

November 21, 2012

Dear Zach P,

For several years now I have been a regular reader at Arthur Topham’s site, Radical Press. Never did I find anything promoting hate. Indeed I found it to be a site full of interesting and educational material. Certainly there was never a word to promote violence or hatred in any way, shape, or form. Not even by innuendo!

While Arthur was away from his blog for the past months I found my reading to be missing something ~ the stimulation of Mr. Topham’s erudite and witty perspective which is about as peaceful as any I have come across over the years.

I certainly will not be impressed with Netfirms.com if they started censoring and pulling down legitimate websites merely on the accusations of special interest groups here in Canada in conjunction with the RCMP.

Consider the ramifications, Mr. P., and please do the right thing. Stand for freedom of speech in our great country.

Sincerely,

B. Lee

—————

Dear Zach P,

In your letter to Arthur Topham, you state:

“We have been advised by a visitor to your web site radicalpress.com that such web site contains content that is alleged to be untrue, offensive, slanderous, harassing or controversial in nature.”

The key word in this sentence is ‘alleged.’  In other words, according to your next two sentences, “Accordingly, please remove such content within 48 hours of this notice. Failure to delete such content within such period will result in termination of your website,” you would do harm to someone on an allegation.  How would you like to be treated as such?  I would guess you wouldn’t like it at all.

Please reconsider your ultimatum.  Fairness demands it.

Sincerely,

Steve Campbell

———————-

November 21, 2012

Att: Zach or whom it may concern

I am writing to express support for Arthur Topham and his website radicalpress.com

I have been informed that you have considered shutting down his site on mere accusations of material that. according to Det-Cst Terry Wilson is alleged to be untrue, offensive, slanderous, harassing or controversial in nature. May I ask what evidence he has given you in this matter? Is his “opinion” all you would need to even consider such an action? Do you always act on such “allegations” without any facts of matter? I am confident that I could surely find some or more of the websites that you host offensive to me; would that be all you need to shut them down? “Controversial in nature”? Please, gimme a break! Whose “opinion” is not controversial?

In that case, please provide me with a list of Netfirms hosted websites so that I may peruse them to find what I might deem controversial or  offensive so that I can immediately let you know what should be acceptable or not and I trust that you will take the necessary actions to give notice to each of them and shut them all down in due course. Or would I need to be a Det-Cst to have such a priveledge? Maybe I am.  Maybe I am a lawyer. Maybe I am a judge.

You state that you are not responsible for content or links posted by your customers. Then I fail to see how you can now deem yourself in such a position to ask Mr. Topham to “remove such content within 48 hours of this notice”. Are you now going to rely on “your opinion” on what is deemed acceptable? Would that allegedly put you in an unlawful position and a possible lawsuit against Netfirms Inc?

In closing, I feel that radicalpress.com is providing a service that is beneficial to freedom and I appreciate that you host his site. I harbor no hatred nor do I support any “hate-sites” but I DO support free speech in Canada and I will support Arthur’s free speech as well. Even yours. If I do not like the material on Arthur’s site I am free to not go to it. Please do not take that freedom away from open minded people like myself by judging what should or should not be available on the internet as a whole, unless it clearly is unlawful content such as advocating violence or provides unlawful information in order to cause harm to others. I see none of that in radicalpress.com.

Sincerely,

Mike Gould

—————-

Dear Zach P.

In regard to the letter you received from Terry Wilson it might interest you to know that propaganda is a neutral term… it merely means ‘to propagate’. Your RCMP ‘friend’ claims that Arthur is printing material Terry Wilson claims is hate. I hate (ooops) to tell you this but Terry Wilson is a paid agent of the crown which propagates more falsehoods than the Fraser River spawns salmon.  But be that as it may, to defend oneself from ‘hate’ when what one feels or thinks is personal, private and harms no one is not a position any man or woman should be put in, in a free society. It absolutely negates the freedom we supposedly enjoy in this nation. It certainly is not criminal regardless of how lawyers define it. You might do better to investigate the legal implications of Terry Wilson’s assertions as well as your instant compliance. Stultifying freedom of speech is a crime against the freedom of the people, especially if in so doing it causes damage by way of material and hours lost. It makes you and your associates complicit in slander and libel.

The very fact that such statutes exist in a free nation belies the assertion of all the politicians who wax eloquent about freedom and justice. This is especially hypocritical following as soon as it does after the recent memorial day commemoration. Did those men die for a lie? For your company to simply comply with a paid agent of the Crown in light of an assertion based on such dubious and dangerous legislation makes you culpable in this overt action of repression.

There are reams and reams of articles written in every newspaper and website in the land, and even more so on every television set in every home and much of it is lies, more lies and damn lies. Only fools with weak minds fall victim to such propaganda. Only fools who claim they have been hurt by words would confess to such a weakness of mind. Perhaps you might ask Terry Wilson to explain what authority he draws on to make the claims he does and furthermore, show cause for using his office to intimidate you and your associates? After all he does state: ‘If you have any questions please don’t hesitate to contact me at the above email or at 604-543-4903.’ Have you no questions to ask of him then?

Regards,

Rudi Weyrich
w/o prejudice

——————

[Read more…]

Traitors in our Midst by Arthur Topham

BBTRAITORS

Traitors in our Midst

by Arthur Topham
Publisher
RadicalPress.com

November 22, 2012

“Thoughts are free and are subject to no rule. On them rests the freedom of man and they tower above the light of nature.

~ Paracelsus, Selected Writings

When I learned yesterday that the cop who was instrumental in spying on my website RadicalPress.com for over a year on behalf of the Zionist Jew lobbyist group B’nai Brith Canada had sent a letter of complaint to my web hosting company Netfirms.com whining and crying that I have been charged with a section 319(2) Criminal Code “Hate Crime” offence that he felt might “contravene” Netfirms.com’s policy (specifically section 4(b)(i)), I was not only disgusted beyond belief but angered that the RCMP would stoop so low in order to do the bidding of these foreign interest groups who set themselves up in Canada behind their phoney false masks of respectability only to then proceed to work behind  the scenes to undermine the democratic freedoms and rights that so many of our fore bearers fought and died to achieve.

Knowing full well that this case is now before the Supreme Court of Canada and that the contents on my website are a vital component of my defence in this trumped up charge, Det-Cst Terry Wilson still couldn’t resist his ongoing urge to do whatever possible in the dark to try and destroy not only years of my work but to also destroy evidence that he knows damn well will make the Crown’s attempt to find me guilty of this spurious charge virtually impossible to accomplish.

Now I could understand the two complainants in this case, both Zionist agents for B’nai Brith Canada who laid the complaint against me initially, pulling off a stunt like this. As a matter of fact the whole sordid, pathetic affair first began on Valentine’s Day, Feb. 14, 2007 when I received my first hate letter from a “Brian Esker” who later turned out to none other than an agent of B’nai Brith Canada masking himself in digital drag so he could safely threaten me and my website.

This foreign agent pulled this precise same thing back in 2007 prior to laying a formal complaint against me and my website using Section 13(1) of the Canadian Human Rights Act in order to accuse me of promoting, “ongoing hatred affecting persons identifiable as Jews and/or as citizens of Israel.”

At that time I had a web hosting server by the name of Alentus.com. This agent of B’nai Brith, who  screams bloody murder that he had nothing at all to do with it, sent what appears to be the exact same complaint to the server and bingo! they too gave me 48 hours to find another server or else my website would be liquidated like some counter-revolutionary Zak imprisoned in the wastelands of the Soviet gulag during the 1930s.

I had no time to get help and all of my letters to Alentus might as well have been addressed to Atlantis because they obviously didn’t reach anyone of intelligence and as a result I lost my former RadicalPress forum and an abundance of historic, priceless data when a last ditch attempt was made to salvage the site.

This second attempt on B’nai Brith’s part to destroy RadicalPress.com obviously was planned to include a Gentile dupe so that they could cover up their bloody tracks and what better dupe than the duplicitous Detective Terry Wilson, a self-serving, slithering snake in the grass who sold his soul to the Zionist devil decades ago and has since been serving Zion in their relentless quest to gain absolute control over the one means of free expression still left on this planet – the Internet.

So I immediately replied to “Zach P” the “Corporate Support” goof who sent out the Ultimatum. I asked him to let me know what content it was that I was being asked to “remove” within 48 hours. I then wrote back two more times as Zach P had ended his threatening letter with the statement, “Should you have further questions, please contact us.” Yah sure Zach.

I then sent out an APB release asking supporters to write to Zach P and tell him that RadicalPress.com wasn’t a “hate propaganda” site and that they wanted it left up. Letters are still coming in that were sent to Netfirms.com.

This morning I spoke to a webmaster friend of mine who thought the email address for Netfirms.com looked a bit weird and so I phoned their office in Toronto and spoke to a support representative. He did his best to figure out what was going on and did confirm that the email address wasn’t a scam but eventually he had to transfer me over to a supervisor located in Arizona.

I spoke to this woman for quite some time trying to reason with her on a number of things but all to no avail. She would say, “Well, if you would just remove any content ‘that is alleged to be untrue, offensive, slanderous, harassing or controversial in nature’ then there shouldn’t be a problem.” In turn I would reply, “Well, madam, if I KNEW what content that Det Wilson was referring to then I might possibly be able to remove it.”

And she went on to say that it was most unfortunate that all the Corporate people were away on holidays today and I would reply, “Oh I’m certain that Zach P was fully aware when he sent me this 48 hour email that he wouldn’t be returning to his office until the last minute.” And she would repeat…..the same old line all over.

Finally she advised me to just “park” the site before the 48 hours were up or else there was a good chance that Netfirms.com would delete it and everything would be lost. Parking it of course would mean that no one would then be able to access it.

I tried in vain to tell her that the website was the subject of a Supreme Court case here in Canada and that it was impossibly for me to remove any content or else I could face additional criminal charges. That wasn’t a concern for  her. I added that Netfirms.com itself could possibly face litigation for destroying evidence if they deleted my site. Then she would begin again with the “…if you remove the content (she was always implying that I must know what the content is) before the 48 hours…..etc.”

Finally before hanging up she had the audacity to say that if and when I was found innocent of said allegations that  all I had to do was let Netfirms.com know and they would be “happy” to place the site online once again!

I told her quite frankly that no, that would never happen and that for the rest of my days I would do whatever I could to tell other Canadians what a phoney, hypocritical web hosting site Netfirms.com truly is and that it was just one more tool for censorship like all the other Zionist media.

NetfirmsCensors

But getting back to these traitors, Wilson and Levas. To think that this supreme sell-out has been working around the clock to destroy my site behind closed doors instead of allowing the courts to come a decision is one of the most low-down, nauseating moves anyone could make let alone someone who professes to be a “Peace Officer” and a protector of all that is honourable, Canadian, honest and decent.

No matter how one looks at it these two deluded, mind-controlled zio-zombies are TRAITORS to their country! They ought to be shipped off to Israel where their true sentiments and crooked, deceitful ways would be most appreciated. It’s high time we filled a boat load or two of these Zionist 5th columnists, along with the two complainants in this sec. 319(2) charge and all the rest of the traitorous executive of B’nai Brith Canada and sent them back to their “spiritual homeland” where they belong. Why they are here in Canada doing their utmost to destroy our way of life is something each and every Canadian should seriously begin to think about before we all lose our freedom to speak our minds.
————-

RadicalPress.com UPDATE

Dear Reader,

The site is currently undergoing changes due to Det. Terry Wilson having intimidated Netfirms.com into terminating my account. We are working on restoring all aspects of it but for now only text messages will appear. My apologies to all supporters of freedom of speech and Internet Freedom.

Sincerely,

Arthur Topham

Editor – RadicalPress.com

Please direct all inquiries to me at the following email address: editor@quesnelcariboosentinel.com

B’nai Brith Canada: Still Beating the ‘anti-Semitic’, ‘Hate’ Drum By Arthur Topham

B'naiBrithHateDrum

B’nai Brith Canada: Still Beating the ‘anti-Semitic’, ‘Hate’ Drum

By Arthur Topham

November 8, 2012

Back in September of 2005, just a little over seven years ago, I received word that Michel Chossudovsky, Professor of Economics at the University of Ottawa and website owner of GlobalResearch, was being attacked in the Zionist-controlled media by one of its big guns, the Ottawa Citizen. True to form, those behind this orchestrated assault upon Canada’s Charter of Rights & Freedoms were none other than our present gung ho, chutzpah-raving free speech haters, B’nai Brith Canada, the same secret, Jews-only ‘benevolent’ masonic order of pro-Israeli, pro-Zionist lobbyists who have been, and are still, attacking RadicalPress.com and its illustrious Publisher and Editor, Arthur Topham since 2007.

At the time I decided to write an article in Mr. Chossudovsky’s defense; one that would highlight for Canadians the hidden underbelly of this Rothschild-created, Big Brother censorship Beast and show people how it truly operates behind its deceptive, public persona. I called that article, “B’nai Brith: Beating the anti-Semitic Drum”.

Now one of the things that the Zionist media are focusing on today in their current smear campaign against my person and my website is the fact that I have on my site a relatively miniscule number (out of over 1400 posts) of the standard anti-Zionist writings that the Zionist Jews have been harping on and crying the blues about for close to a century now. In their entrenched, circumscribed minds they feel that by focusing on these particular writers (Eustace Mullins) or writings (Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion); ones that they’ve expended vast amounts of energy, ink and money on trying to wipe out from the history books of humanity, that they’ll convince readers and listeners that RadicalPress.com is, as one of their recent smug-looking little hack writers for Yahoo! Canada News,  Steve Mertl, wrote, “…a nasty little blog called Radical Press, which espouses the idea that a worldwide cabal of Zionist Jews control the levers of power” written by the “bigot” Arthur Topham.

The point of their focusing on these selective items, repeated ad nauseam throughout all of their media outlets both across Canada and in foreign nations like Israel, is to first off discourage readers from even going to the site in question, but furthermore, to control the discussion and thwart any need on their part to actually address the numerous other articles written by myself and others that they fear to debate for lack of any reasonable counter argumentation.

It was therefore (in the 2005 article now being edited, re-written and updated) to assist others in comprehending the breadth and depth of this universal scheme to silence dissent and permit an unleashed, purposeful program of pro-Israeli propaganda to emerge throughout Canada’s mainstream media, one affecting both the mass mind of the citizenry as well as the nation’s legal and social fabric, that I wrote the initial article, in the hope and belief that concerned individuals might be made aware of the nascent beginnings of organizations like B’nai Brith International and its subordinate offshoots like B’nai Brith Canada.

In order to define this fantastic Pharisiac phenomenon known as B’nai Brith International and expose its heinous, deadly purpose, it was necessary for me to furnish the reader with some extensively researched commentary from a book written over fifty-five years ago by a once famed (and now defamed) British author and Journalist by the name of Douglas Reed.

Reed5

In his virtually unknown (today), yet massively documented and scholarly seminal work on the history of Political Zionism and its effects upon the past and present global political situation, (The Controversy of Zion, Dolphin Press (Pty) Ltd., 1978)[1] Mr. Douglas Reed, former Chief European war correspondent for the London Times and successful author of numerous popular books written prior to, during and after WW II, gave future historians a plethora of extremely pertinent contextual information concerning both B’nai Brith International and the Anti-Defamation League (A.D.L.); factual information that clearly defines and relates to what is presently taking place with respect to B’nai Brith Canada’s current assault upon RadicalPress using Section 319(2) of Canada’s criminal code.

Reed was no slouch when it came to covering historical events of his time and as the pieces of the puzzling times began to take shape before his analytical eye he eventually concluded that the hidden hand behind the paradigm-shattering decisions of his period was none other than that of the Zionist Jews and their obsequious sycophants in high office whom they were able to solicit for support.

In order to understand such a perspective though one needs to cast an eye back a full century to the period of U.S. President Woodrow Wilson’s years in office and the time of the first world war and the creation of the Federal Reserve system. It was during this era that the original silent coup by Zionist forces usurped the independence of the White House and placed its exclusive powers in the hands of Wilson’s chief Advisor Mr. Colonel House, a pro-Zionist proponent.

In his book Reed describes President Wilson as “a captive president” and as the war drew nigh stated that after his election “Mr. House took over his correspondence, arranged whom he should see or not receive, told Cabinet officers what they were to say or not to say, and so on.”[2]

I would not hesitate at this point to say that we’re seeing precisely this same phenomenon occurring within Canada’s Conservative government with Harper’s blatantly unabashed public display of seditious grovelling when it comes to anything Zionist or related to Zionism’s captive state, Israel.

Reed, who was born in 1895 just two years prior to Theodor Herzl (Political Zionism’s official founder) setting up the World Zionist Organization in 1897, grew up during the early years of the 20th Century and came of age, politically-speaking, while living in Europe throughout the thirties and forties, witnessing in detail the intimate machinations by the world leaders who were then rearranging the pieces on the world’s political chessboard.

In his exhaustive analysis of how the Zionists slowly, but surely, overtook the U.S. government’s executive levels of command, the better to gain control of policy-making for the exclusive purpose of acquiring the lands of Palestine in order to create their “State” of Israel, Reed emphasized the critical role played by groups such as B’nai Brith International in blocking all criticism of their efforts through the use of blackmail, intimidation and public vilification of the sort we’re now seeing employed against myself and the Radical Press.

It was after this period of initiation into the inner workings of intrigue by the Zionist forces that he began voicing his comments on B’nai Brith International. He writes:

“At that period (1913) [of Colonel House and W. Wilson, A.T.] an event occurred which seemed of little importance then but needs recording here because of its later, larger consequence. In America was an organization called B’nai Brith (Hebrew for “Children of the Covenant”). Founded in 1843 as a fraternal lodge exclusively for Jews, it was called “purely an American institution”, but it put out branches in many countries and today claims to “represent all Jews throughout the world”, so that it appears to be part of the arrangement described by Dr. Kastein[3] as “the Jewish international”. In 1913 B’nai Brith put out a tiny offshoot, the “Anti-Defamation League”. It was to grow to great size and power; in it the state-within-states acquired a kind of secret police and it will reappear in this story.”[4]

In Chapter 43, aptly titled “The Invasion of America”, Reed describes to a tee the techniques presently being applied to myself and Radical Press in order to discredit my person and my work while at the same time expunging from the public mind of Canadians the true motives of Israeli domestic and foreign policies. Please witness the following comments:

“While military invasions and counter-invasions multiplied during the six years of the Second War, absorbing all thought and energy of the masses locked in combat, a silent invasion went on which produced more momentous effects than the armed ones. This was the political invasion of the American Republic and its success was shown by the shape of American state policy at the war’s end, which was so directed as to ensure that the only military invasions that yielded enduring “territorial gains” were those of the revolution into Europe[by the Soviet Union. Ed.] and of the Zionists into Arabia . . .”[5]

“The renewal of large-scale immigration formed the background to the political invasion of the Republic. This was a three-pronged movement which aimed at the capture of the three vital points of a state’s defenses: state policy at the top level, the civil services at the middle level and “public opinion” or the mass-mind at the base. The way in which control over acts of state policy was achieved (through the “adviserships” which became part of American political life after 1913) has already been shown; this part of the process having preceded the others. The methods used to attempt the capture of government services will be discussed later in this chapter. In what immediately follows the capture of the mass-mind in America, through control of published information, will be described; it was indispensable to the other two thrusts. [Emphasis mine. Ed.]

“This form of political invasion is called by Dr. Weizmann[6], who exhaustively studied it in his youth when he was preparing in Russia for his life’s work in the west, “the technique of propaganda and the approach to the masses”. The operation so described may now be studied in actual operation:

“Far back in this book the reader was invited to note that “B’nai Brith” put out a shoot. B’nai Brith, until then, might be compared with such groups of other religious affiliation as the Young Men’s Christian Association or the Knights of Columbus; its declared objects were the help of the poor, sick and fatherless and good works in general. The little offshoot of 1913, the “Anti-Defamation League”, had by 1947 become a secret police of formidable power in America.*

In a footnote Reed adds:

*In fact though not in form. The secret police in countries where the institution is native have their entire power and resources of the state behind them; indeed, they are the state. In America Zionism built the nucleus of a secret police nearly as effective in many ways as those prototypes [the former USSR and China and Israel today. Ed.]. It could only become equally effective if it gained full control of the state’s resources, including the power of arrest and imprisonment, and in my judgment that was the ultimate goal. [It is my contention that this is precisely what has taken place in my own case wherein, through the power and influence of B’nai Brith (via their two front men), they were able to produce a false document full of “allegations” that resulted in Det. Cst. Terry Wilson’s BC HATE CRIME TEAM being given the go-ahead to arrest and incarcerate me and also obtain a Search Warrant which then allowed the police to steal all of my computers and private communications and then impose soviet style restrictions on my ability to post my defence on the Internet and write emails and even browse the Internet! Ed.]

In Doublespeak “anti-defamation” means “defamation” and this body lived by calumny, using such terms as anti-semite, fascist, rabble-rouser, Jew-baiter, Red-baiter, paranoiac, lunatic, madman, reactionary, diehard, bigot and more of the like [Including now the term “hate”. Emphasis mine. Ed.]. The vocabulary is fixed and may be traced back to the attacks on Barruel, Robison and Morse after the French revolution; the true nature of any writer’s or newspaper’s allegiance may be detected by keeping count of the number of times these trade-mark words are used. The achievement of this organization (usually known as the A.D.L.) has been by iteration to make fetishes of them, so that party politicians hasten to deny that they are any of these things. [Emphasis mine. Ed.] Under this regime reasoned debate became outlawed; there is something of sorcery in this subjugation of two generations of Western men to the mumbo-jumbo of Asiatic conspirators.

“When the A.D.L. was born in 1913 it had merely desk-room in the parent B’nai Brith office and a tiny budget. In 1933 Mr. Bernard J. Brown wrote, “Through the intervention of the A.D.L. we have succeeded in muzzling the non-Jewish press to the extent that newspapers in America abstain from pointing out that any person unfavourably referred to is a Jew”. In 1948 the Jewish Menorah Journal of New York wrote, “Should but one phrase in a reprinted literary classic reflect unjustly upon Jews, the A.D.L. will promptly belabour the innocent publisher until he bowdlerizes the offending passage. Let one innocent movie-producer incorporate a Jewish prototype, however inoffensive, in his picture and the hue and cry raised by the A.D.L. will make him wish he’s never heard of Jews . . .

“These quotations show the growth of the A.D.L.’s power in thirty-five years. It has imposed the law of heresy on the public debate in America. No criticism of Zionism or the world-government plan is allowed to pass without virulent attack; . . . [Emphasis mine. Ed.]

“America has today a few surviving writers who fight on for independent debate and comment. They will discuss any public matter, in the light of traditional American policy and interest, save Zionism, which hardly any of them will touch. I have discussed this with four of the leading ones, who all gave the same answer: it could not be done. The employed ones would lose their posts, if they made the attempt. The independent ones would find no publisher for their books because no reviewer would mention these, save with the epithets enumerated above.[7]

“The A.D.L., of such small beginnings in 1913, in 1948 had a budget of three million dollars (it is only one of several Jewish organizations pursuing Zionist aims in America at a similar rate of expenditure). The Menorah Journal, discussing “Anti-Defamation Hysteria”, said, “Fighting anti-semitism has been built up into a big business, with annual budgets running into millions of dollars”. It said the object was “to continue beating the anti-semitic drum” [Emphasis mine. Ed.] and “to scare the pants off prospective contributors” in order to raise funds. It mentioned some of the methods used (“outright business blackmail; if you can’t afford to give $10,000 to this cause, you can take your business elsewhere”), and said American Jews were being “stampeded into a state of mass-hysteria by their self-styled defenders”.[8]

A private organization [B’nai Brith. Ed.] which can produce such results is obviously powerful; there is nothing comparable in the world. Mr. Vincent Sheehan wrote in 1949, “There is scarcely a voice in the United States that dares raise itself for the rights, any rights, of the Arabs; any slight criticism of the Zionist high command is immediately labelled as anti-semitic”. . .
[Emphasis mine. Ed.]

“How is the oracle worked? By what means has America (and the entire West) been brought to the state that no public man aspires to office, or editor feels secure at his desk, until he has brought out his prayer-mat and prostrated himself to Zion? How have presidents and prime ministers been led to compete for the approval of this faction like bridesmaids for the bride’s bouquet? Why do leading men suffer themselves to be paraded at hundred-dollar-a-plate banquets for Zion, or to be herded on to Zionist platforms to receive “plaques” for services rendered? [Such as the recent ‘award’ given to PM Harper by the Zionists while in New York. Ed.]

“The power of money and the prospect of votes have demonstrably been potent lures, but in my judgment by far the strongest weapon is this power to control published information; to lay stress on what a faction wants and to exclude from it all that the faction dislikes, and so to be able to give any selected person a “good” or a “bad” press. [Emphasis mine. Ed.] This is in fact control of “the mob”. In today’s language it is “the technique of propaganda and the approach to the masses”, as Dr. Weizmann said, but it is an ancient, Asiatic art and was described, on a famous occasion, by Saint Matthew and Saint Mark: “The chief priests and elders persuaded the multitude . . . The chief priests moved the people . . .”

“In forty years the A.D.L. [i.e. B’nai Brith. Ed.] perfected a machine for persuading the multitude. It is a method of thought-control of which the subject-mass is unconscious and its ability to destroy any who cry out is great . . . [Emphasis mine. Ed.]

“The A.D.L. (and the American Jewish Committee) “set out to make the American people aware of anti-semitism”. It informed Jews that “25 out of every 100 Americans are infected with anti-semitism”, and that another 50 might develop the disease. By 1945 it was carrying out “a high-powered educational program, geared to reach every man, woman and child” in America through the press, radio, advertising, children’s comic books and school books, lectures, films, “churches” and trade unions. This programme included “219 broadcasts a day”, full-page advertisements in 397 newspapers, poster advertising in 130 cities, and “persuasions” subtly incorporated in the printed matter on blotters, matchbox covers, and envelopes. The entire national press (“1900 dailies with a 43,000,000 circulation”) and the provincial, Negro, foreign-language and labour newspapers were kept supplied with, “and used”, its material in the form of “news, background material, cartoons and comic strips”. In addition, the A.D.L. in 1945 distributed “more than 330,000 copies of important books carrying our message to libraries and other institutions”, furnished authors with “material and complete ideas”, and circulated nine million pamphlets “all tailored to fit the audiences to which they are directed”. It found “comic books” to be a particularly effective way of reaching the minds of young people, soldiers, sailors and airmen, and circulated “millions of copies” of propaganda in this form. [Emphasis mine. Ed.] Its organization consisted of the national headquarters, public relations committees in 150 cities, eleven regional offices, and “2,000 key men in 1,000 cities”.

The name of the body which supplied this mass of suggestive material never reached the public. During the 1940’s the system of “syndicated writers” in New York or Washington enveloped the entire American press. One such writer’s column may appear in a thousand newspapers each day; editors like this system, which saves them the cost of employing their own writers, for its cheapness. [Those readers who have been following the smear campaign against myself and Radical Press will easily see that this is precisely the technique still being used. The same lies and distortions appear throughout all of the Zionist controlled media throughout Canada. Ed.] Through a few dozen such writers the entire stream of information can be tinctured at its source . . . By all these means a generation has been reared in America (and this applies equally to England [and definitely Canada. Ed.]) which has been deprived of authentic information about, and independent comment on, the nature of Zionism, its original connection with Communism, the infestation of administrations and capture of “administrators”, and the relationship of all this to the ultimate world-government project.” [9]

Reed finally concluded that the greatest of all threats to the USA and other democratic nations, Canada included, was Political Zionism. He writes:

“The three forces which weaken the whole structure of American public life in effect serve the strongest among themselves, Political Zionism, which stands behind the seats of the mighty while the others [communism and organized crime. Ed.] work in lesser places, if to similar ends of power-over-politicians. The proof of this supremacy is to be found by a simple test: the extent to which public discussion is permitted . . . At the topmost level, a virtual ban on public discussion of Political Zionism proves the paramountcy of its sway in American affairs. [Emphasis mine. Ed.] As in England, the open expression of doubt about this territorial ambition, and support for it, has been almost driven underground in recent years. An imperial thrall has been laid on America in this matter. Traditional Americans, whose forebears detested laws of lese-majesty and the genuflections of courts, now find their leaders performing an even humbler obeisance in this direction; like foremost politicians in England, they thus emulate those Rumanian nobles who long bowed to the Sultan’s rule, vainly hoping to keep rank and possessions. The Soviet ban on ‘anti-Semitism’ (which was in effect a veto on public discussion of the origins of Communism) has in practice been extended to the British island and the American Republic [and Canada. Ed.] in the matter of Political Zionism. It is lese-majesty [i.e. treason A.T.] in a new form and because of it present-day Americans and Englishmen [and Canadians. Ed.] do not as a rule see the grave future courses and penalties to which support of Political Zionism has committed them.”[10]

That, in a nutshell, is the most poignant description of the power and purpose of Zionism’s foremost global censorship organ, B’nai Brith International.

It takes little extrapolating to see that all which Reed described in his above comments dovetails smoothly with the apparent convoluted, confusing and tumultuous period that we’re now experiencing in both Canadian and global politics. To elaborate further upon that subject must remain the labour of another article and another time. What is essential here is that readers note the connectedness of events and the fact that the Political Zionists are still very much alive and alert in their diligent and determined effort to destroy the sovereignty of nation-states, serve the interests of Israel and bring in the ill-fated New World Order under the auspices of their original plan, the United Nations.

To those ends organizations such as the B’nai Brith (Canada) and the A.D.L. have evolved and continue to act as Zionist watchdogs and public censors. It is not surprising therefore that they would eventually attack me and my website RadicalPress.com for Political Zionism’s bold and ambitious plans for global dominance owes allegiance only to its proponents and thus their exclusive and racial policies of imperialism (exemplified in Gaza and the Middle East in general) continue to pose a direct threat to both the Christian and Moslem world.

Our ultimate freedom therefore as an independent and sovereign nation depends upon our ability to combat this censorship of free speech which continually keeps the occult nature of Political Zionism hidden from the public eye and places in jail all those who attempt to unmask its diabolical plan.

————–
Footnotes:

[1] The book can be found in the U.S.A. at Abebooks.com or online at http://www.controversyofzion.info .
[2] Controversy of Zion, Page 242
[3] Dr. Joseph Kastein according to Reed was a “zealous” Zionist historian who wrote the book, History and Destiny of the Jews, (Eng. trans., London, 1933). He is extensively quoted by Douglas Reed in his book Controversy of Zion.
[4] Controversy of Zion, Page 243
[5] Controversy of Zion, Page 339
[6] Dr. Chaim Weizmann was a tireless proponent of Zionism. Having supplanted Theodor Herzl as the leader of the World Zionist Organization back in 1904 his influence throughout the formative years of the first half of the 20th Century upon the creation of Israel is well documented. He eventually became Israel’s first Prime Minister in 1948.
[7] Reed had first-hand experience of this practise. In 1952 the Canadian Jewish Congress requested that Canadian booksellers refuse to carry his books. [Emphasis mine. Ed.]
[8] Controversy of Zion, Pages 340 – 342
[9] Controversy of Zion, Pages 342-345
[10] Far and Wide, Page 274.

STUNNING VICTORY FOR FREEDOM OF SPEECH by Merv Ritchie


September 5, 2009

FROM THE EDITOR’S DESK:


RADICAL EDITOR & PUBLISHER ARTHUR TOPHAM
_______________________________________

Dear Radical Reader,

The recent and still very provocative ruling by Canadian Human Rights Tribunal Member Athanasios Hadjis on September 2, 2009, (the Lemire Decision) – one that holds great promise of finally bringing down the massive house of cards better known as the Canadian Human Rights Commission – has finally freed up at least one of countless mainstream media online news service agencies, allowing them the much needed freedom to give some long sought coverage to the CHRC’s “hate crime” complaint case involving Agent Z and the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada v. Arthur Topham and RadicalPress.com.

As the Editor and Publisher of RadicalPress.com I must gratefully and gleefully take off my hat to Merv Richie, publisher and owner of the Terrace Daily.ca, an online news service located in the northwestern community of Terrace, British Columbia, Canada and extend a firm handshake to him and say thank you for having both the wisdom and the courage to do what the rest of Canada’s supposedly independent and objective news media should have done two years ago when this controversial case first became public.

I had long hoped that my own community newspaper, the Quesnel Cariboo Observer, would have been the one to have broke the story but after initially covering the issue back in early 2008 they were immediately silenced by a false threat of a law suit from the very personage who now appears to have lost his case against against Marc Lemire in this outstanding ruling – none other than Ricardo Warmouse, good friend of Agent Z, the Complainant who laid the infamous sec. 13(1) “hate crime” charge against myself and my website back in July of 2007.

While this important ruling is the first major step in the eventual dismantling of this quasi-judicial internal censorship syndicate created by the Zionist lobby groups currently permeating all aspects of Canadian government, industry, media and academia it isn’t the final end for this vile, draconian sec. 13(1) anti-free speech law. As I recently wrote to one email correspondent regarding this issue, “When one is dealing with a deadly serpent it’s best not to take your attention off it until its head is severed from its body. In my case the head of this viper is still very much intact.”

Mr. Merv Richie has done a great service for everyone who believes in our Charter rights to freedom of expression and freedom of the press and he deserves a round of applause and encouragement for his willingness to put his shoulder to wheel at a time when this vehicle of expression is only just beginning to budge out from the Stalinist rut it’s been stuck in for the past twenty odd years. Please do write to him and thank him and pass this article to all you can.

Shine your Light for Love, Peace & Justice for All,

Arthur Topham
Publisher/Editor
The Radical Press
Canada’s Radical News Network
“Digging to the root of the issues since 1998”
http://www.radicalpress.com
radical@radicalpress.com
——————————

http://www.terracedaily.ca/show4688a/STUNNING_VICTORY_FOR_FREEDOM_OF_SPEECH

STUNNING VICTORY FOR FREEDOM OF SPEECH
by Merv Ritchie

2nd September 2009

This morning a new light shines across Canada. The Canadian Human Rights Tribunal (CHRT) has had its fangs trimmed. Section 13, the law that prohibits speaking openly about uncomfortable truths has finally been defeated. Commonly referred to as the anti hate law it has been used to stifle criticism of policy and ideology on almost every medium. The first use of the law was to force a man, John Ross Taylor, to stop using his own personal telephone answering machine to leave messages for people that wanted to call in and hear what he had to say. Generally his thoughts were against Canada’s immigration laws. The latest use of the law was to charge a man, Marc Lemire, who ran an internet chat forum. Although he did not approve postings to the message board (it was an open message forum) he was held to account for what others posted.

A BC website (operated by a former Kitimat native) is also currently under indictment by the CHRT for criticizing an ultra right wing faction of Israeli/Jewish politics called Zionists. Many do not like Arthur Topham’s blunt, unorthodox, politically incorrect writings on his website, Radicalpress.com, however he provides evidence and background to back up everything he writes. Truth is not a defence against the CHRT as every person and organization that has come under their radar has discovered, as they all were convicted. That is a 100 percent prosecutorial success rate, a rate unheard of anywhere in the world except in this secretive organization that has recently been investigated by the RCMP.

In his decision Athanasios D. Hadjis set a very high bar for new prosecutions under this act. Only the most vile and alarmist writings should be considered for prosecutions and the Charter of Rights and Freedoms protects Canadians, allows Canadians, to discuss issues that are not politically correct. The conclusion is as follows;

V. CONCLUSION
I have determined that Mr. Lemire contravened s. 13 of the Act in only one of the instances alleged by Mr. Warmouse, namely the AIDS Secrets article. However, I have also concluded that s. 13(1) in conjunction with ss. 54(1) and (1.1) are inconsistent with s. 2(b) of the Charter, which guarantees the freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression. The restriction imposed by these provisions is not a reasonable limit within the meaning of s. 1 of the Charter. Since a formal declaration of invalidity is not a remedy available to the Tribunal (see Cuddy Chicks Ltd. V. Ontario (Labour Relations Board), [1991] 2 S.C.R. 5), I will simply refuse to apply these provisions for the purposes of the complaint against Mr. Lemire and I will not issue any remedial order against him (see Nova Scotia (Workers’ Compensation Board) v. Martin, 2003 SCC 54 at paras. 26-7).

His comments on the AIDS Secret article in part are as follows;

In my view, the material found in the AIDS Secrets article expresses unusually strong and deep-felt emotions of detestation and vilification towards homosexuals in particular. The article is rife with hyperbole and moral condemnation. Homosexuals, and Blacks to a lesser extent, are denigrated as purveyors of a “killer” that is on the loose, agonizingly destroying the lives of American children and adults alike. Extreme language is used to vilify them and their lifestyles. They are portrayed as a powerful force that is conspiring to bring harm to others. Rather than using the statistics and studies in a dispassionately scientific manner, the article adopts an alarmist, almost hysteric tone, which along the above mentioned characterizations, is likely to expose them to hatred or contempt.

This is a very dramatic shift in the manner in which Canadians might discuss issues. It allows for a much greater freedom to engage in discussions. It also has very profound impacts on internet websites and forums.

Although Mr. Lemire did not compose the AIDS Secrets article he allowed it to be posted on his website and therefore was found responsible for distributing this material.

The conclusion found Section 13 to be at odds with the Charter of Rights. The next few weeks and months will determine the future of the CHRT. It has caused much grief for many individuals who wanted to expose some knowledge they discovered to the general public. Today a fresh wind of freedom to speak out has blown across Canada.
———–

Also see the following: Two of your articles are posted on our site here. Merv.

http://www.terracedaily.ca/show13s/PROVOCATIVE

—————–

Arthur Topham is the Publisher and Editor of RadicalPress.com. He is currently involved in a free speech battle with the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada.

He is also in extremely dire need of financial support to sustain this battle with the forces of repression and censorship as he is not able to work during this period of intense litigation with the Canadian Human Rights Commission and the CHR Tribunal. Any donations therefore would be most welcome. Please see the following url on the Home Page (upper right hand corner) http://www.radicalpress.com/?page_id=657 regarding donations. Also there is a “DONATE” button there for Paypal or here at https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=4466120 . Feel free to use any of them if you can help out. Thanks.

Arthur welcomes all feedback to his articles and can be reached at radical@radicalpress.com .

For the Full Monty on the complaint case involving RadicalPress.com and B’nai Brith Canada please see: http://www.radicalpress.com/?page_id=995