http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=786 Tue, 07 Sep 2010 08:25:05 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.1 http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=786#comment-29229 Thu, 02 Apr 2009 06:07:15 +0000 http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=786#comment-29229 [...] ** the ‘Hallmarks of Hate’ are in actuality a template used by the Canadian Human Rights Commission to determine whether or not any communications on a website fit the description of being a “hate crime” so that the Commission can then recommend an inquiry before the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal. They were created by Zionist Jews and then passed off as legitimate evidence in previous Section 13 cases so as to set a precedent with them. The obvious transparency of these so-called determiners of hate is that they only fit one group in Canada and that group is of course the Zionist Jews themselves and their lobby groups such as B’nai Brith Canada, the Canadian Jewish Congress, the Simon Weisenthal Center and the Jewish Defense League. I set out these arguments in my “Comments on CHRC Report. Re: Complaint from Harry Abrams and B’nai Brith Canada against RadicalPress.com” September 17, 2008 http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=786  As I state in that document the ‘hallmarks’ were designed: “…to act as a template for the entrapment and conviction of any publisher or writer who attempts to offer the general public information on the subject of political Zionism. To suggest that all of these “hallmarks” would apply to any other group in the world besides the Zionist-Jews would be an absurd proposal. It is these very same Zionist-run Jewish advocacy groups in Canada who have been the foremost advocates of this undemocratic section of the Canadian Human Rights Act as well as the one group who have laid the most complaints against Canadian citizens under this section. As such it appears extremely naïve to expect the majority of Canadians to fall for this obvious ruse.” —————- [...] […] ** the ‘Hallmarks of Hate’ are in actuality a template used by the Canadian Human Rights Commission to determine whether or not any communications on a website fit the description of being a “hate crime” so that the Commission can then recommend an inquiry before the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal. They were created by Zionist Jews and then passed off as legitimate evidence in previous Section 13 cases so as to set a precedent with them. The obvious transparency of these so-called determiners of hate is that they only fit one group in Canada and that group is of course the Zionist Jews themselves and their lobby groups such as B’nai Brith Canada, the Canadian Jewish Congress, the Simon Weisenthal Center and the Jewish Defense League. I set out these arguments in my “Comments on CHRC Report. Re: Complaint from Harry Abrams and B’nai Brith Canada against RadicalPress.com” September 17, 2008 http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=786  As I state in that document the ‘hallmarks’ were designed: “…to act as a template for the entrapment and conviction of any publisher or writer who attempts to offer the general public information on the subject of political Zionism. To suggest that all of these “hallmarks” would apply to any other group in the world besides the Zionist-Jews would be an absurd proposal. It is these very same Zionist-run Jewish advocacy groups in Canada who have been the foremost advocates of this undemocratic section of the Canadian Human Rights Act as well as the one group who have laid the most complaints against Canadian citizens under this section. As such it appears extremely naïve to expect the majority of Canadians to fall for this obvious ruse.” —————- […]

]]> http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=786#comment-27522 Mon, 23 Feb 2009 03:05:51 +0000 http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=786#comment-27522 [...] On September 5, 2008 Topham received the Investigation Report from Ms. Natalie Dagenais, Director, Investigations Division. http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=785 . He was given until September 17, 2008 to comment on the Report. See: http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=786 . [...] […] On September 5, 2008 Topham received the Investigation Report from Ms. Natalie Dagenais, Director, Investigations Division. http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=785 . He was given until September 17, 2008 to comment on the Report. See: http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=786 . […]

]]> http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=786#comment-26645 Fri, 30 Jan 2009 15:35:51 +0000 http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=786#comment-26645 [...] As I have previously stated, both in my original Response to the CHRC Investigating officer ( http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=629 January 3, 2008 ) and in my Comments on the CHRC final Report ( see: http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=786 Sept 17/08 ), this is not a simple case of a person of “Jewish faith” being personally maligned or threatened or libeled. Nor is a mundane example of some benign, benevolent society within the ranks of Canada’s multi-cultural social milieu being unduly criticized or picked on for spiteful or vexatious reasons. It is much more complex and convoluted and important, relatively speaking. [...] […] As I have previously stated, both in my original Response to the CHRC Investigating officer ( http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=629 January 3, 2008 ) and in my Comments on the CHRC final Report ( see: http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=786 Sept 17/08 ), this is not a simple case of a person of “Jewish faith” being personally maligned or threatened or libeled. Nor is a mundane example of some benign, benevolent society within the ranks of Canada’s multi-cultural social milieu being unduly criticized or picked on for spiteful or vexatious reasons. It is much more complex and convoluted and important, relatively speaking. […]

]]> http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=786#comment-25092 Sat, 29 Nov 2008 23:30:25 +0000 http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=786#comment-25092 [...] http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=786 Comments on CHRC Report. Re: Complaint from Harry Abrams and B’nai Brith Canada against RadicalPress.com Sept 17/08 [...] […] http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=786 Comments on CHRC Report. Re: Complaint from Harry Abrams and B’nai Brith Canada against RadicalPress.com Sept 17/08 […]

]]> http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=786#comment-24586 Fri, 26 Sep 2008 01:10:15 +0000 http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=786#comment-24586 [...] Topham has posted a dissertation of his defence on his website. http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=786  Comments on CHRC Report. Re: Abrams/B’nai Brith Complaint against RadicalPress.com . Topham maintains that his ongoing critique of Zionism is political debate only. He further states that his wife of many years is Jewish, and that he is not anti-Semitic. Topham also challenges the CHRC on their assertions of political incorrectness regarding specific books and third party materials on his site. [...] […] Topham has posted a dissertation of his defence on his website. http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=786  Comments on CHRC Report. Re: Abrams/B’nai Brith Complaint against RadicalPress.com . Topham maintains that his ongoing critique of Zionism is political debate only. He further states that his wife of many years is Jewish, and that he is not anti-Semitic. Topham also challenges the CHRC on their assertions of political incorrectness regarding specific books and third party materials on his site. […]

]]>