RadicalPress.com’s Statement of Particulars: RE: Abrams v Radicalpress.com
[Editor’s Note: Just after the hearing process proceeded I received a copy of a manual for the parties involved in the case. It was called What Happen’s Next? A Guide to the Tribunal process. Under the heading of Statement of Particulars it reads:
“A statement of particulars is a description of the material facts that the party seeks to prove in support of his or her case, the party’s position on the legal issues being raised and the remedy being sought…. The statement of particulars should also include a list of relevant documents in the party’s possession ….”
What is contained below are the two salient sections dealing with the “Issues” and the “Remedies Sought” which compose the main portion of my Statement of Particulars sent to the Tribunal on June 16, 2009. Basically they outline the arguments which I intend to pursue in the upcoming hearing.
Since sending it off I have received two responses to it from the Complainants Harry Abrams and Anita Bromberg of B’nai Brith Canada the second being an amended version of the first. I will be posted their reply separately along with comments.]
Harry Abrams
and
The League For Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada
v.
Arthur Topham
and
RADICALPRESS.com
File Number: T1360/9008
STATEMENT OF PARTICULARS
June 16, 2009
Arthur Topham
Pub/Ed
The Radical Press
4633 Barkerville Hwy
Quesnel, B.C. V2J 6T8
Email: radical@radicalpress.com
June 16, 2009
Nancy Lafontant
Registry Officer
Canadian Human Rights Tribunal
Nancy.Lafontant@chrt-tcdp.gc.ca
Dear Nancy Lafontant,
RE: Harry Abrams and the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada v. Arthur Topham and the RadicalPress.com
File Number: T1360/9008
Please find enclosed my Statement of Particulars including the Issues, Venue Location and Remedies Sought in the above case.
The Corpus of Relevant Documents, due to their volume, are included in the CDs being sent off to the parties today via Canada Post.
If there is any further formality that you require, please let me know as soon as possible.
Sincerely,
Arthur Topham pro se
Publisher/Editor
The RadicalPress.com
Cc:
Anita Bromberg, Co-complainant
Marvin Kurz, Complainant Counsel
Harry Abrams, Complainant
Daniel Poulin, Commission counsel
Douglas Christie, Intervenor, Canadian Free Speech League
CHRC, National Office
Issues
42. This case raises several crucial issues but first and foremost of them all is one of primary, critical and fundamental import in need of special address, clarification, understanding and ultimately, redress; not only by the Tribunal and the Commission but also by the general public, our social and cultural institutions, our political leaders and governments at all levels. It is the urgent need for the conscious awareness and recognition of the willful creation and ongoing deception manifesting as the incessant, erroneous promulgation of the idea or concept of what the Zionist Jews and their misinformed, duped supporters term “hatred.” This deliberate, ongoing manufacture of a myth of hate; this intentional, debilitating deceit of fabricating the false, misleading and enormous belief or misconception that the Jewish community, or any ethnic community in Canada, is somehow in imminent danger due to the twin falsehoods of “hatred” and “contempt,” accompanied, as always, by their crippled cousin “anti-Semitism,” has been an ongoing, historic attribute of the Zionist agenda of disinformation and division amongst democratic nations since the inception of the World Zionist Organization in 1897; one which, I submit, set the pace for Zionism’s relentless attack upon Western civilization throughout the 20th Century and into the present one. It is the basis upon which all efforts to destroy freedom of speech in Canada are dependent and the prelude to efforts at creating a one world totalitarian government.
B’nai Brith Canada, an offshoot of B’nai Brith International which itself is a further offshoot of Rothschild-funded Illuminati/Freemasonry secret societies, is one of Zionism’s principle organizations in Canada being used to foster this lie and use it for their own highly suspect purposes, none of which are of benefit to an open and free and democratic nation such as Canada purports to be. The issue of what these purposes are and how Canada’s judicial system is being hijacked in order to accomplish them will form the basis of my critical, comprehensive purview of Section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act for it is the contention of myself, Arthur Topham, the Respondent that this specific section of the Act is the spearhead of the illegal, unjust and unconstitutional laws being thrust into the very heart of Canada’s judicial system and thus permeating and poisoning the nation as a whole.
The rest of the issues are satellite ones which revolve about this core problem, they being:
a) The case illustrates and corroborates the facts indicating the futility of and the undemocratic, illogical and unreasonable nature of the controversial section contained within the Canadian Human Rights Act, known as Section 13.
b) Section 13 is a flawed piece of legislation; intentionally flawed by the very people who were instrumental in creating it – the Zionist Jews working through their foreign lobby groups like B’nai Brith Canada and the Canadian Jewish Congress – aided and abetted by misinformed, pro-Zionist sycophants within the Canadian government system and a monopolist media owned and controlled by Zionist Jews.
c) Section 13 was painstakingly designed over the last four decades to permit only one perspective and one result to ensue whenever this legislation was used against Canadian citizens and that final result is to protect and shield the very forces within government and society who have been instrumental from the start in creating the whole “Hate Myth,” that being the Zionist Jews and their lobbying entities as well as the Zionist-Jew forces who also control Canada’s mainstream media.
d) The design of Section 13 negates the possibility for a Respondent to present fair, honest, factual and truthful evidence in their defense. While the Tribunal’s manual suggests that a Respondent is given an opportunity during a hearing to argue their case in order to “persuade the Tribunal to reach a particular conclusion,” the reality is that the manner in which the legislation is worded and the subsequent supportive jurisprudence designed, all of which has been intentionally enacted to support Section 13, presents a formidable, if not an impossible challenge for any Respondent caught within its web of legal jurisprudence and quasi-judicial juggling and sophistry.
e) The plain facts are that Harry Abrams and his co-complainant Anita Bromberg represent a foreign Zionist-Jew lobby group whose primary purpose is surveillance of Canada’s media in order to stifle and censor any and all negative criticism of Israeli foreign and domestic policies, thus permitting the ongoing program of Zionist infiltration of Canada’s democratic government institutions including its judiciary and lending an apparent illusion of tacit support to federal government efforts to support the racist state of Israel, the slaughter of innocence in Gaza and the illegal war in Afghanistan.
f) Section 13 is a draconian, undemocratic, legalized wedge being driven into the heart of Canada’s legal system in order to open up an avenue through which the forces of Talmudic-style totalitarianism, state dictatorship and the loss of freedom of speech will enter. It is a Trojan Horse of the first degree best renamed for what it truly is: a “Zionist-Jew Trojan Horse”, designed to destroy the very foundation upon which Canada’s legal system has functioned in relative, democratic fashion since this nation was first founded.
g) The Complainants for B’nia Brith Canada and its counsel, Marvin Kurz, a member of this same organization, are all fully aware of the allegations being made against them. This organization, having spent untold millions over the past century and longer to brainwash Canadians into perceiving it as merely a benevolent advocacy group for Canadian Jews still reeling from the fabricated adverse effects of the Nazis, is anathema to everything that the average Canadian of my generation once held as sacred, pure and worth fighting and dying for. Their facade or veneer of congeniality, their feigned fraternal nature and their outwardly professed concern for all other cultures and for the concept of “multiculturalism” is, I suggest, but a ruse meant to deceive Canadians into thinking that organizations such as B’nai Brith Canada truly have the interests of all Canadians at heart and that their work is solely meant to enhance the well-being of all of Canada’s citizens and thus, in the process, embellishing their own group’s progress and safety within the context of our open and free society. All of this, unfortunately, is a lie and to show the public that it is in fact a lie meant to deceive Canadians in order to fulfill a totally and diametrically opposite agenda, is the reason that I have responded to this complaint; one which Abrams and B’nai Brith Canada gleefully took up.
h) Section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act is nothing less than the Devil in disguise, inserted, I submit, into an otherwise sensible and useful Act for ulterior and nefarious purposes which this hearing will, if given the opportunity, clearly show. If the hearing process disallows the opportunity for presenting such a case then it will once again serve as yet another example to Canadians of the conspiratorial nature of this specific legislation and the futility of participating in a quasi-judicial processes which lends credence to and justify its use against the majority of Canadian citizens.
The manner in which Section 13 exists and the restrictions it poses for Respondents accused under its false rubric, based as it is upon fabricated myths of pretended “hate” purporting to be established, scientific truth, makes a mockery of real justice and serves no moral or humane purpose. Being impenetrable due to its intrinsic design it offers no avenue of redress and therefore is undemocratic and an abomination to Canada’s fundamental civil and human rights. Hearings brought forth by Commissions using the pretext of this legislation must be dismissed for what they are: “Show Trials” of the same caliber as the former Soviet Union during the totalitarian Bolshevik reign of power.
i) All of the parties involved in this complaint are aware that I have also filed a Constitutional Challenge to Section 13 of the CHR Act. That challenge, in concert with a similar challenge by Marc Lemire now awaiting ruling by the federal court, is meant to further expose the machinations of the organizations who I am alleging have been instrumental in creating and abusing Canadian citizens and Canada’s legal system for their own selfish, political ends. This aspect of the hearing will hopefully be substantiated to a further degree by the other organizations who have applied for intervenor status in this case.
j) The question of special compensation under s. 54(1)(b) of the CHR Act also enters into this case. I, as Respondent, have maintained from the start that the charges brought against me are strictly political in nature. Prior to receiving notice of the charges I was not consciously aware of the entity known as Harry Abrams other than having possibly read articles pertaining to another alternative new site (www.PEJ.org) which also had been charged with the same offence and was contesting it. In none of the articles published on my website subsequently submitted by the Complainants to the Commission alleging to be “hate” literature can be found any special mention of a person named Harry Abrams. Yet, after accusing me of contriving “to promote ongoing hatred affecting persons identifiable as Jews and/or as citizens of Israel” this advocate for a foreign country, Israel, hiding his true agenda behind the B’nai Brith Canada mask of supposed respectability, is now demanding that the Tribunal award him personally an order for special compensation under s. 54(1)(b) of the CHR Act for $20,000.00 based upon the fabrication that I specifically identified him in the aforesaid articles and subjected him personally to discrimination therefore entitling him, as a “victim” of such practises, to a vile and fraudulent sum of money. This is, I submit, extreme hubris, fraudulent and chauvinistic.
Venue Location
43. The Respondent, Arthur Topham, has weighed the pros and cons of holding the hearing in Victoria, B.C. rather than Quesnel, B.C. and decided that in the interest of all parties concerned Victoria, B.C. would be the most suitable location.
Remedies Sought
The Respondent requests that the complaint be dismissed on the grounds that:
Section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act is an unconstitutional piece of legislation designed only to benefit one particular group in Canada, that being the Zionist Jews and their foreign lobbyist organizations.
The articles posted on RadicalPress.com do not expose groups to hatred or contempt. They are, in fact, historical, literary and political analysis and opinion.
The Complainants in this case, Harry Abrams and Anita Bromberg, are abusing an intentionally flawed piece of legislation contained in the Canadian Human Rights Act, to wit, Section 13, for political purposes and to vilify and smear both myself, Arthur Topham, and my news site RadicalPress.com.
The organization known as B’nai Brith Canada is a false front organization controlled by B’nai Brith International headquartered in the foreign state of Israel which is a proven subversive organization controlled by Zionist Jews and operating under the guise of a fraternal society and an advocacy group. It has proven connections to the International terrorist organization MOSSAD as well as to its American arm of B’nai Brith International known as the Anti-Defamation League (ADL). The ADL is also linked to Crime Syndicates throughout the USA and is a proven Terrorist organization also ran out of Israel for the purpose of slandering and silencing critics of Israeli foreign and domestic policies which are, at their basis, proven to be racist, apartheid and supremacist in nature.
The Canadian Human Rights Commission, through its blatant complicity with this foreign lobby group B’nai Brith Canada has discredited itself as a neutral and impartial human rights organization. As such its actions can only be perceived as being detrimental to the democratic rights of the majority of Canadians now enshrined in the Charter of Rights and Freedoms and an abuse of legislation which ostensible was designed to ensure equality of rights for all Canadians not just special interest groups like B’nai Brith Canada. In this case both the Complainants and the Commission are abusing legislation which is allegedly remedial and are using the legislation in an attempt to destroy a perceived political enemy and to silence political opposition to policies not only of the Canadian government but of a foreign state (Israel). Such actions on the part of these two bodies are not only detestable but should be viewed as highly illegal as well, bordering on, if not in fact, commensurate with, treason.
—————