[Editor's Note: Hans Krampe has been enjoying an unusually long hiatus from contributing his writing to RadicalPress.com and so his article below, geared as always to stir up controversy, is a most welcome addition to the list of RadicalPress provocative essays. Welcome back Hans! 
]
—————
Counter Punch to the World of Hate
The malice of Noam Chomsky exposed
By Hans Krampe
January 24, 2009
ÂÂ
ÂÂ
“Whoever allows himself to claim that the alleged Nazi gas chambers and the alleged genocide of the Jews are a historical reality is, whether he likes it or not, giving support to a horrid lie that has become the number one war propaganda weapon of the State of Israel, a colonialist, racist and imperialist State. Let whoever has the nerve to support the ‘Holocaust’ myth look at his hands! His hands are red with the blood of Palestinian children!”
This quote was made by the indomitable historian revisionist Dr. Robert Faurisson in his interview with the Algerian daily Echorouk on Jan.12, 2009, about Israel’s mass murder in Gaza. Here are some details about him for you, dear reader, to compare with the armchair courage of Noam Chomsky.
Robert Faurisson is about the same age as Chomsky, 80 years old. He was born near London in 1929 to a French father and a Scottish mother. He’s both a British subject and a French citizen. He has been a university professor and taught at the Sorbonne and at a university in Lyon. He earned the agrégation (a degree obtained after the highest competitive examination) in modern and classical languages and literature (French, Latin, Greek) and holds a doctorate in literature and the social sciences (which encompass history). His two specialties have been modern and contemporary French literature and the appraisal of texts and documents (literature, history, media). He has taken a special interest in Second World War propaganda, for which his second specialty is supremely applicable. After publishing the results of his meticulous research of the latter his life became hell from the day in July 1974 when he was denounced by the Israeli newspaper Yedioth Aharonoth. From 1974 to today he has suffered ten physical assaults, some nearly fatal, has had countless court cases and convictions and has ended up being deprived of the right to teach at university. In nearly all the Western world, with or without any special law, revisionism is severely punished. A certain number of his revisionist colleagues or friends have been, or are now, in prison, some for long years, especially in Germany and Austria; countries with whom no peace treaty has yet been signed following the end of hostilities in 1945 and whose governments remain subject to the will of the victors of WW II. In the following text are some of the names mentioned of those friends of his, who languish in jails as of this writing. All of them are people of exemplary courage and integrity.
———————————————————————————————————
The universal perception of what constitutes a hate crime, and who is hating whom, needs desperately to be adjusted to the spirit of truth. I attempt to do this using the example of Noam Chomsky. His opinions are paralleled by legions of individuals who fall all over themselves emphasizing their profound outrage for Israel’s mass murders in Palestine by maligning the victims of a much greater and more horrendous outrage that was masterminded by Jews and committed for them in the past by the very forces that support Israel’s openly committed crimes in contemptuous defiance of the decent sensibilities of all of humanity.
By definition a Jew is a person who selectively follows, and profits from, the laws and instructions of the Talmud, the Old Testament (Torah) and the secret teachings of the Cabala. Jews are largely ethnic Ashkenazis. There are no ethnic Jews. Jews are a secular cult with religious pretensions. An atheist Jew, or a Jew of any religious denomination, is a contradiction in terms, often used by cryptos (hiding behind a facade). In this sense many “Jews” are not Jewish, even if they may have had Jewish parents. That’s what Adolf Hitler and the National Socialists meant by A-1 Jews, many of whom AH designated Aryans by way of merit, approximately 200 000, of which 150 000 served honorably in the Wehrmacht.
The so-called Judaic “religion†is for all intents and purposes a pseudo-spiritual justification of the basest crimes committed by something called Jews; also called “devil-worshippers†by Christians and Muslims etc. Their “faith†is of a purely pragmatic and secular nature, dressed in all kinds of theatrical rituals to fool the gentiles and often themselves. Their faith is skin-deep, but their egotism goes to the bone. In short, their rituals are a cover to obscure that it’s all about material ambitions and conspiracies with malicious intent. Jews are accomplished liars, especially in “spiritual†and “racial†matters. Lying and deceiving are some of the prominent instructions of the Talmud and an essential part of Jewish culture.
We may call Rumsfeld and Cheney Jews because they probably follow secretly either the tenets of the Talmud or something just as bad, namely, their obvious psycho-pathology that finds in the Talmud a convenient “spiritual” justification and encouragement. Witness their unswerving and remorseless commitment to blatant in-your-face malignancy. As with the Jews, their “faith” consists exclusively of a belief in their own self-interest and nothing else.
George W. Bush cannot be called a Jew in that sense because he is not competent enough to know what this means. His obviously limited intellectual capacity made him a convenient, albeit a somewhat low quality, tool. That’s what a POTUS is intended to be by Jews who control who gets there. It was too much for Bush’s abilities to tackle with at least an appearance of some modicum of brilliance. He clearly is a patsy.
When I read in Layla Anwar’s essays of her repeatedly expressed contempt for Chomsky, my first reaction was “WHAT?†But, upon a bit of reflection, I couldn’t help agreeing with her.
Over the years I have developed nagging suspicions about Noam Chomsky’s integrity, after having read several books and booklets of his. He undoubtedly is a most gifted and cool Jew, though he claims to be an atheist anarchist, often pretending to clarify when he is in fact obfuscating, if not downright misleading. I discovered over time that he is profoundly dishonest, in other words he lies knowingly and calculatedly.
This might sound odd, considering that he is regarded as the most uncompromising critic of the hypocritical and anti-social conduct of all governments and the media and enjoys massive respect and support world wide. Yet, he never addresses the whole truth. The issue of the overwhelming Jewish dominance of virtually all financial systems, all governments, all media, as well as the entertainment, film and publishing industries in all of the Western world, he speciously ignores.
He firmly supports the idea of Israel’s right to exist (in Palestine) and promotes a two-state solution as the “only†pragmatic one. This solution benefits from his long standing habit of ignoring, if not nixing, any inconvenient past realities as irrelevant, a gross, yet deliberate, deficiency in terms of his pretended full spectrum perception. Are we seriously to believe that he has never heard that for almost a 100 years there exists already another sovereign and purely Jewish state by the name of Birobidjan on the Chinese/Russian border? If I, a gentile, know that, how come Chomsky, a Jew, doesn’t??
As in all his dissertations, as well as now in the Palestinian context, he never misses an opportunity to casually malign Adolf Hitler and the German National Socialists, tacitly suggesting that their bottomless evil is a self-evident fact, practically a given, which to deny would be utter folly. Does he really not know that Adolf Hitler was actively negotiating with France to make Madagascar available as a home state for Jews in order to save the Palestinians the fate they are suffering now? It was a hell of a lot more humane and pragmatic an idea than Chomsky’s.
I wouldn’t be surprised if he declared, with a straight face, that six million Jews, gassed by Germans, is an indisputable fact, even though that number has been sized down countless times, even by Jews, to the point where it’s become obvious that the Jews who died in NS Germany did so by natural causes and as victims of the consequences of allied terror bombing, of which far more Germans died as well.
The truth, in fact, forces a paradigm shift in who is guilty and who were the real holocaust victims. Not to mention the bottomless depravity of over 60 years of the most sickening and sadistic slander campaigns Chomsky is involved in, with the purpose of ruining the lives of even future generations of Germans forever.
He tacitly reminds us never to forget that the Germans deserve to pay, pay, pay until the end of time; not to mention his intentional depiction of the atrocities of Israel as something nothing new, a milder form of what the Germans (Nazis) did much worse not so long ago.
The man’s deliberate avoidance of the history of WW I and the Weimar republic, not to mention NS Germany, is an insolent demonstration of malicious calculation in every statement he makes about Adolf Hitler and the “Nazisâ€Â, from the protection of his de facto Jewishness. Like everybody else’s, it is also his favorite canard of evil, a comfortable knee-jerk habit. What he wants us to think he knows is always in tune with anti-German hate propaganda, factual history notwithstanding, which is massively maintained by Jews and force-fed into every facet of North-American life, nonstop. According to Chomsky and many others of his class of thinkers, that propaganda is reality, hardly worth needing to be pointed out, and to be accepted sight unseen. Virtually every American worth his apple pie goes along with it to the point of irrational fanaticism. The more you lie big the more it is believed, and Chomsky, for one, proves it.
The current rhetoric about Israel’s bloodbath is just plastered with a renewed surge of anti-German hate propaganda, which Jews made sure to spread like a virus world wide. In face of such monumental display of brainwashed malice, to replace it with the truth seems to be a Quixotic endeavor, indeed. Endeavored it nevertheless is… and courageously so by such heroes as Faurisson.
I doubt that Chomsky is the least interested in any revisionist arguments, let alone their forensically obtained findings. He is purposefully ensconced in a cocoon of anti-German hate propaganda from which his reasoning operates with the basso profundo of utter conviction. His world-wide reputation as a thorough scientist and a fair and knowledgeable person makes his calumny all the more contemptible. It’s terms are calculated to discourage any questioning doubts about his conventional wisdom.
I would love to see him debate such moral giants as Juergen Graf, Horst Mahler, Germar Rudolf, Robert Faurisson, Ernst Zuendel or Gerd Honsik, all of them revisionists, patriots and defenders of the truth; all of them persecuted and four of them currently incarcerated for opinion crimes, which rank right up there with terrorism. They are just the tip of the iceberg of a movement that is rapidly gaining critical mass in Europe. My personal feeling is that Chomsky wouldn’t be found dead debating any of them. I’m sure he knows that he hasn’t got a leg to stand on. But more likely he’s loathe having eventually to admit that Jews, who he claims have a right to exist as an Israeli state in Palestine, have already masterminded this other much larger and more brutal genocide on the German nation and thus forfeited any rights whatsoever, other than a place in hell.
Whether Chomsky likes it or not, Jews have no business in Palestine, not historically, not ethnically, not morally and not in any other way; just as they had – and have – no business in Germany, which they currently view as a milk cow, to be milked until it atrophies. In Palestine they now can live out their sick fantasies which they have used, just as Chomsky, to malign Adolf Hitler, a thoroughly decent man and genius, and the German National Socialists, for over 60 years, as cover up of the bottomless depth of their own perverted mentality.
Collectively, Jews forfeited any fair consideration from day one in Palestine, or anywhere else, by committing an unbroken chain of sadistic atrocities to achieve purely imperialistic ends for millennia.
That Chomsky doesn’t see it that way speaks volumes for me. His scathing rhetoric, mostly pointed exclusively at gentile hypocrisy, obscures the plainly evident hypocrisy of himself.
In short, he has begun to be regarded with increasing disgust by all kinds of reasonable people! But being a Jew that shouldn’t faze him.
—–
Hans Krampe is a former feature writer for The Radical, a monthly tabloid published in B.C. Canada from 1998 to 2002 by the Radical Press. He can be contacted at hjk@ quesnelbc.com
