Can I really believe what I just heard? by John Kaminski

KaminskiTrumpHdr

Can I really believe what I just heard?

Can the Jew-controlled U.S. actually stop waging wars?

CAN A NATION OF KILLERS EVER REALLY TALK ABOUT PEACE?

By John Kaminski
pseudoskylax@gmail.com

I was astonished. For a moment the words seemed like an auditory mirage I was hearing in a dream. But there they were. I could play them back. In his speech at the Mayflower Hotel in Washington April 27, Donald Trump was saying he wanted to get along with Russia and China.

“Our goal is peace and prosperity,” Trump announced with finality, “not death and destruction.”

It was a thought I hadn’t heard expressed by any politician in . . . how long? Ever?

I immediately thought of Richard Nixon’s campaign promise of a secret plan to end the Vietnam war, a promise that he didn’t keep and a plan he did not have that nevertheless won him the 1968 presidential election.

I searched back in my memory for a candidate who talked of peace rather than bludgeoning a designated enemy.

Nixon mouthed friendly platitudes when he opened up communication with Communist China. And that was back in the early 1970s. Since then? Well, Bill Clinton illegally took campaign contributions from China back in the early ’90s. But that was when such contributions were against the law, and the law was still actually enforced, more or less.

Now Hillary Clinton goes directly to Israel to collect contributions, much in the way Mitt Romney did in the last election. It might still be against the law, but all Americans — everybody in the world, in fact — knows by now that politicians are never prosecuted for accepting illegal campaign contributions.

Heck, politicians are only in rare instances ever prosecuted for breaking the law at all, and those who actually are prosecuted are usually innocent, like Jim Traficant http://www.americanussr.com/american-ussr-james-traficant.htm and George Hansen http://www.uhuh.com/reports/hansen/hansen2.htm. Politicians have to have done something to offend the bankers’ cabal to even get noticed for committing a crime.

Breaking laws in a primitive quest for profit has never been a crime on the uppermost political level. Obama’s last crooked attorney general sold weapons directly to terrorists with nary a peep from the U.S. law enforcement community. That was the clincher that proved all the cops and judges and lawyers in America were utterly corrupt.

Among an endless number of examples prior to that and proving the point, virtually the entire U.S. government was guilty of treason for engineering the 9/11 coverup, which remains firmly in place.

As a particularly vivid recent example, the aforementioned Hillary, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Israeli Mossad, is facing a slew of charges from her improper handling of emails, when she was making billions for the Clinton Foundation using the power of the U.S. government to accumulate her fortune. Worse, of course, was her complicity in the slaughter of a U.S. ambassador, who himself was trying to sell weapons to terrorists in another war the criminal Obama administration was trying to foment.

Most Americans are still unwilling to admit to the unending crime spree and insane cruelty of the U.S. government that has affected everyone in the world, including its own citizens. Just about everyone has become inured to the warlike rhetoric that emanates from Washington. It is profound evidence of the sickness of American society and both the thoughtlessness and the powerlessness of its people.

So Trump, for all the bad press he has received from corrupt media outlets trying desperately to cover up the criminal activities of the bosses who pay their salaries, says he wants to change America’s attitude. He wants to “shake the rust off America’s foreign policy.”

This in itself is a superficial explanation. Without spelling out the analysis of America’s history that really needs to be exposed, he simply says, “The interests of America have to come first.”

The implication that remains unsaid is WHOSE interests have been served in their place for all these years and through all these wars. Neither Trump nor any other candidate has any intention of explaining those interests.

“In the 1940s we saved the world,” Trump says, adding, “We won the Cold War and we won big.”

But after that, he says, “Our foreign policy veered badly off course. We failed to develop a new vision. Logic was replaced with foolishness and arrogance”

Today, Trump concludes, “Our foreign policy is a complete and utter disaster —no vision, no purpose, no direction, no strategy.”

This is great theater already gaining positive reviews for his so-called command of U.S. foreign policy issues. For Trump to jump behind the scenes and reveal that the Jewish banking families in control of the Federal Reserve system have caused all of America’s woes over the last century is simply not going to happen.

Which is too bad, because that’s exactly what needs to happen.

Hence, the root cause of America’s planned disintegration and pauperization are neither going to be addressed nor corrected.

Be all that as it may, Trump is still far and away the best candidate this year — and perhaps the best candidate in many a year, for that sullied and disreputable office of the presidency of the United States.

Why? Foremost, he is the candidate most likely to keep us out of World War III, assuming Obama doesn’t start it before the election (as his legacy to the American people).

Secondly, he will put the criminal Hillary Clinton in jail where she belongs, we hope.

And what he says about our relations with Russia and China are very positive.

“We are not bound to be adversaries. The easing of tensions is possible.” And quit forthrightly he aims for “fixing our relations with China.”

In a tradition of presidents best known for starting wars from behind the scenes and approving the fleecing of the American people at the behest of Jewish bankers, he is a refreshing alternative to the robotic shills who talk only about Israel’s interests. I liked ex-speaker John Boehner’s remark that Trump’s main rival for the GOP nomination, Ted Cruz, was “Lucifer in the flesh”, which speaks volumes about who the power elite wants as its president.

On the other hand, Trump is still caught up in the urban legends created by the Jews and blamed on others, a syndrome most notably evident in the choreographed Muslim terror threat.

Trump may have made some promising statements about 9/11 and the Iraq war but has never addressed the false flag episodes in the United States — such as Sandy Hook — that were cynically created by the government in the campaign to get people to give up their guns.

I have not heard Trump say anything about the Second Amendment, and he is still connecting Osama bin Laden to 9/11. These are both evidence he will continue this neocon artificial reality that is destroying both our country and our world,

And he made a statement in that Washington speech that was much more prescient that even he realized when he said, “Unless you name the enemy, you will never ever solve the problem.”

In blaming Islamic terror as our No. 1 foreign policy problem, he has missed the mark. Our No. 1 foreign policy is the Jewish manipulation of reality, from which all our other problems stem, including so-called Islamic terror.

Some people say, “Well, he has to wait until after the election to really deal with that.” But I think back to Nixon’s peace plan to end the war which never really arrived until five years had passed and tens of thousands more people had died.

How many millions more must die before we finally have a leader who will clearly reveal the hidden hand behind this inhuman policy of robbery, murder and betrayal that jeopardizes the continuing survival our species?

Will it be Donald Trump? Doubtful.

FURTHER POINTS TO PONDER:

• The Muslim terror threat is not the greatest danger to all life on the planet. The greatest danger to all life on the planet is the U.S. military following the orders of insane Jews who seek to kill or enslave all the nonJews of the world.

• The ISIS group, which the U.S. pretends to battle, is really the creation of the U.S. and Israel, making Obama’s pronouncements the epitome of American hypocrisy. Like ISIS, al-Qaeda was and is the creation of American policy, making everything you’ve read in a newspaper or heard on TV about this group to be a total misrepresentation. And all those millions of lives, as Cindy Sheehan has been pointing out for years, have been thrown away for nothing but a lie.

• With the American military perched in key positions on the edge of Russia, bombing Syria, still strafing Afghanistan, having already obliterated Libya, assisting in the Saudi invasion of Yemen, and trying to stir up trouble in the South China Sea, what do you think Donald Trump means when he enthusiastically exclaims that he wants to create a much stronger American military?

God help us all. And He won’t — unless we help ourselves and rid the world of this criminal government that permits only Jew-approved despots to run for president.

—-

John Kaminski is a writer who lives on the Gulf Coast of Florida, constantly trying to figure out why we are destroying ourselves, and pinpointing a corrupt belief system as the engine of our demise. Solely dependent on contributions from readers, please support his work by mail: 6871 Willow Creek Circle #103, North Port FL 34287 USA.
http://therebel.is/kaminski
http://johnkaminski.info/
http://www.rudemacedon.ca/kaminski/kam-index.html
http://www.serendipity.li/john_kaminski_articles.htm
http://web.archive.org/web/20040323232319/http://johnkaminski.com/

The Jewish Roots of the Saudi Royal Family by Mohammad Sakher

SAUDIJEWROOTSFINAL

The Jewish Roots of the Saudi Royal Family

by Mohammad Sakher

The House of Saud refers to the royal family of Saudi Arabia. While the modern nation of Saudi Arabia was established in 1932, the House of Saud has been around for much longer. Prior to Ibn Saud, this family ruled the Nejd and often came into conflict with the Ottoman Empire and the Rashidis. The House of Saud is also linked with Wahhabism through the marriage of the son of Muhammad ibn Saud with the daughter of Muhammad ibn Abd al Wahhab in 1744.

The history of the House of Saud has been marked by a desire to unify the Arabian Peninsula and to spread a more pure and simple view of Islam embodied by Wahhabism. As such, the House of Saud has gone through three phases: the First Saudi State, the Second Saudi State, and the modern nation of Saudi Arabia.

It should be noted that Saudi Arabia is the only country on Earth named after a family: the adjective “Saudi” indicates something belonging to the House of Saud.

To know more about ‘House of Saud’ click the link below:
http://www.nationmaster.com/encyclopedia/House-of-Saud

Now we come to the main matter. THE SAUDI DYNASTY: FROM WHERE IS IT? AND WHO IS THE REAL ANCESTOR OF THIS FAMILY?

This is the Research and Presentation of MOHAMMAD SAKHER who was ordered killed by the Saudi Regime for the following findings:

1 Are the Saudi Family members belonging to the Tribe of ANZA BEN WA’EL as they allege to be?
2 Is Islam their actual religion?
3 Are they of an ARAB ORIGIN at all?

SaudiRoyFam1950s

In the year 851 A.H. a group of men from AL MASALEEKH CLAN, which was a branch of ANZA Tribe, formed a caravan for buying cereals (wheat and corn) and other food stuff from IRAQ, and transporting it back to NAJD. The head of that group was a man called SAHMI BIN HATHLOOL. The caravan reached BASRA, where the members of the group went to a cereal merchant who was a Jew, Called MORDAKHAI BIN IBRAHIM BIN MOSHE’. During their bargaining with that merchant, the Jew asked them : “Where are you from?” They answered: “From ANZA TRIBE; a clan of AL MASALEEKH.” Upon hearing that name, the Jew started to hug so affectionately each one of them saying that he, himself, was also from the clan of AL MASALEEKH, but he had come to reside in BASRA (IRAQ) in consequence of a family feud between his father and some members of the ANZA Tribe.

After he recounted to them his fabricated narrative, he ordered his servants to load all the camels of the clan’s members with wheat, dates and tamman; a remarkable deed so generous that astonished the MASALEEKH men and aroused their pride to find such an affectionate (cousin) in IRAQ – the source of their sustenance; they believed each word he said and, because he was a rich merchant of the food commodities which they were badly in need, they liked him (even though he was a Jew concealed under the garb of an Arab from the AL MASALEEKH clan).

When the caravan was ready to depart returning to NAJD, the Jewish Merchant asked them to accept his company, because he intended to go with them to his original homeland, NAJD. Upon hearing that from him, they wholeheartedly welcomed him with a very cheerful attitude.

So the (concealed) Jew reached NAJD with the caravan. In NAJD, he started to promulgate a lot of propaganda for himself through his companions (his alleged cousins), a fact, which gathered around him a considerable number of new supporters; but, unexpectedly, he confronted a campaign of opposition to his views led by SHEIKH SALEH SALMAN ABDULLA AL TAMIMI, who was a Muslem religious preacher in AL-QASEEM. The radius of his preaching area included Najd, Yemen, and Hijaz, a fact which compelled the Jew (the Ancestor of the present SAUDI FAMILY to depart from AL QASEEM to AL IHSA, where he changed his name (MORDAKHAI) To MARKHAN BIN IBRAHIM MUSA. Then he changed the location of his residence and settled at a place called DIR’IYA near AL-QATEEF, where he started to spread among the inhabitants a fabricated story about the shield of our Prophet MOHAMMAD (p.b.u.h), that it was taken as a booty by an Arab Pagan in consequence of the OHOD Battle between the Arab pagans and the Muslems. “That shield, he said, was sold by the Arab Pagan to a Jewish Clan called BANU QUNAIQA’ who preserved it as a treasure! He gradually enhanced his position among the Bedouins through such stories which indicated how the Jewish clans in Arabia were so influential and deserved high esteem. He gained some personal importance among the Bedouins, and decided to settle permanently there, at DIR’IYA town, near AL QATEEF, which he decided would be his (Capital) on the Persian Gulf. He aspired to make it his spring board for establishing a Jewish Kingdom in Arabia.

BedouinFam SaudArab

In order to fulfill his ambitious scheme, he started to approach the desert Arab Bedouins for support of his position, them gradually, he declared himself as their king!

At that juncture, the AJAMAN Tribe together with the BANU KHALED Tribe became fully aware of the Jewish cunning plan after they had verified his true identity, and decided to put an end to him. They attacked his town and conquered it, but before arresting him he had escaped by the skin of his teeth.

The Jewish Ancestor of the SAUDI FAMILY, (MORDAKHAI), sought shelter in a farm called at that time AL-MALIBEED-GHUSAIBA near AL-ARID, which is called in our present time : AL-RIYADH.

Saudi Arabia Map

He requested the owner of that farm to grant him asylum. The farmer was so hospitable that he immediately gave him sanctuary. But the Jew (MORDAKHAI), no longer than a month had he stayed there, when he assassinated the land lord and all members of his family, then pretended that all were killed by an invading band of thieves. Then he pretended that he had bought their real estate from them before the catastrophe happened to them! Accordingly, he had the right to reside there as a land lord. He then gave a new name to that place: He named it AL-DIRIYA – the same name as that he had lost.

That Jewish Ancestor of the SAUDI FAMILY (MORDAKHAI), was quick to establish a “GUEST HOUSE” called “MADAFFA” on the land he usurped from his victims, and gathered around him a group of hypocrites who started to spread false propaganda for him that he was a prominent Arab Sheikh. He plotted against Sheikh SALEH SALMAN ABDULLA AL TAMIMI, his original enemy, and caused his assassination in the mosque of the town called (AL-ZALAFI).

After that, he felt satisfied and safe to make (AL-DIRIYA) his permanent home. There he practiced polygamy on a wide scale and, indeed, he begot a lot of children whom he gave pure Arab names.

Ever since his descendants grew in number and power under the name of the SAUDI CLAN and they have followed his steps in practicing underground activities and conspiracies against the Arab Nation. They illegally seized rural sectors and farm lands and assassinated every person who tried to oppose their evil plans. They used all kinds of deceit for reaching their goals: they bought the conscience of their dissidents; they offered their women and money to influential people in that area, particularly to those who started to write the true biography of that Jewish Family; they bribed writers of history in order to purify their ignominious history, and make their lineage related to the most prominent Arab Tribes such as RABI’A, ANZA and AL MASALEEKH.

JEWISH&SAUD

A conspicuous hypocrite in our era whose name is MOHAMMAD AMIN AL TAMIMI- Director/Manager of the contemporary Libraries of the SAUDI KINGDOM, made up a genealogical tree (FAMILY TREE) for this JEWISH FAMILY (THE SAUDIS), connecting them to our Great Prophet, MOHAMMAD (P.B.U.H). For his false work, he received a reward of 35 (THIRTY FIVE) THOUSAND EGYPTIAN POUNDS from the then SAUDI AMBASSADOR TO CAIRO, EGYPT, in the year 1362 AH.- 1943 A.D. The name of that Ambassador is: IBRAHIM AL-FADEL.

As mentioned before, the Jewish Ancestor of the SAUDI FAMILY, (MORDAKHAI), practiced polygamy by marrying a lot of Arab women and begetting many children; his polygamous practice is, at the present time, being carried out ” to the letter” by his descendants; they cling to his marital heritage!

One of MORDAKHAI’S sons called AL-MAQARAN, arabized from the Jewish root (MACK-REN) begot a son called Mohammad, then another son called SAUD, which is the name of the present day SAUDI DYNASTY.

Saudi royal fam

Descendants of SAUD (the present day SAUDI FAMILY) started a campaign of assassination of the prominent leaders of the Arab Tribes under the pretence that those leaders were apostates renegading from the Islamic Religion and deserting their Koranic doctrines; so they deserved the SAUDI condemnation and slaughter!

In the History Book of the SAUDI FAMILY pages (98-101), their private family historian declares that the SAUDI DYNASTY considers all the people of NAJD blasphemous so their blood must be shed, their properties confiscated, and their females be taken as concubines. No Muslem is authentic in his /her belief unless he/she belongs (affiliates with) to the sect of MOHAMMAD BIN ABDUL WAHAB, (whose origins are also Jewish from TURKEY).  His doctrines give authority to the SAUDI FAMILY to destroy the villages with all their inhabitants – males, including children, and to sexually assault their women, stab the bellies of the pregnant, and cut off the hands of their children, then burn them! They are further authorized by such a BRUTAL DOCTRINE to plunder all the properties of those whom they call renegades (not following their Wahabi Sect).

Screen Shot 2016-04-25 at 11.08.02 PM copy

Their hideous Jewish Family has, in fact, done all that kind of atrocities in the name of their false religious sect (the Wahabi), which has actually been invented by a Jew so as to sow the seeds of terror in the hearts of people in towns and villages. This Jewish Dynasty has been committing such brutal atrocities ever since 1163 A.H. They have named the whole Arabian Peninsula after their family name (SAUDI ARABIA) as if the whole region is their own personal real estate and that all other inhabitants are their mere servants or slaves, toiling day and night for the pleasure of their masters (THE SAUDI FAMILY).

They are completely holding the natural wealth of the country as their own property. If any poor person from the common people raises his/her voice complaining against any of the despotic rules of this Jewish Dynasty, (the Dynasty) cuts off his/her head in the public square. A princess of theirs once visited FLORIDA, USA, with her retinue; she rented 90 (NINETY) suite rooms in a Grand Hotel for about One Million Dollars a night! Can anyone of their subjects comment about that extravagant event If he/she does, his/her fate is quite known: DEATH WITH THE EDGE OF THE SAUDI SWORD IN THE PUBLIC SQUARE!!!!!!

SaudiArabiaBeheadings

• Witnesses on the Jewish Ancestry of this Saudi Family:

*** In the 1960’s the “SAWT AL ARAB” Broadcasting Station in Cairo, Egypt, and the YEMEN Broadcasting Station in SANA’A confirmed the Jewish Ancestry of the SAUDI Family

*** King FAISAL AL-SAUD at that time could not deny his family’s kindred with the JEWS when he declared to the WASHINGTON POST on Sept. 17, 1969 stating:

“WE, THE SAUDI FAMILY, are cousins of the Jews: we entirely disagree with any Arab or Muslem Authority which shows any antagonism to the Jews; but we must live together with them in peace. Our country (ARABIA) is the Fountain head from where the first Jew sprang, and his descendants spread out all over the world.”

*** HAFEZ WAHBI, The SAUDI Legal Adviser, mentioned in his book entitled: “THE PENINSULA OF ARABIA” that KING ABDUL AZIZ AL-SAUD, who died in 1953, had said : “Our Message (SAUDI MESSAGE) encountered the opposition of all Arab Tribes; my grandfather, SAUD AWAL, once imprisoned a number of the Sheikhs of MATHEER Tribe and when another group of the same tribe came to intercede for the release of the prisoners, SAUD AWAL gave orders to his men to cut off the heads of all the prisoners, then, he wanted to humiliate and derogate the interceders by inviting them to eat from a banquet he prepared from the cooked flesh of his victims whose cut off heads he placed on the top of the food platters!! The interceders became so alarmed and declined to eat the flesh of their relatives; and, because of their refusal to eat, he ordered his men to cut off their heads too. That hideous crime was committed by that self imposed king to innocent people whose guilt was their opposition to his most cruel and extremely despotic rules.

SaudISIS

***HAFEZ WAHBI, states further that King ABDUL AZIZ AL-SAUD related that bloody true story to the Sheikhs of the MATHEER Tribe who visited him in order to intercede for their prominent leader at that time, FAISAL AL DARWEESH, who was the king’s prisoner. He related that story to them in order to prevent them from interceding for the release of their Sheikh otherwise, they would face the same fate. He killed the Sheikh and used his blood as an ablution liquid for him just before he stood up for his prayer (after the false sect doctrine of the Wahabi). The guilt of FAISAL DARWEESH at that time was that he had criticized King ABDUL AZIZ AL-SAUD when the king signed the document which the English Authorities prepared in 1922 as a declaration for giving PALESTINE to the Jews. His signature was obtained in the conference held at AL AQEER in 1922.

WEIZMANNFEISAL copy

That was and still is the system of this Regime of the JEWISH FAMILY (SAUDI FAMILY): All its goals are : plundering the wealth of the country, robbing, falsifying, and committing all kinds of atrocity, iniquity, and blasphemy – all are executed in compliance with their self invented Wahabi Sect which legalizes the chopping of the heads of their opposing subjects.

Source:
1 http://forum.punjabijunktion.co.in/f39/jewish-roots-saudi-ruling-family-translated-arabic-144466/
2 http://www.coffinman.co.uk/jewish_roots_of_the_saudi_royal_family.htm
3 http://www.fortunecity.com/boozers/bridge/632/history.html

This is the Saudi Arabian Police Badge, look carefully. It symbolizes “one-eyed”. This “one-eyed” symbol is used by the Freemasons. Freemasons are the Devil Worshipers. They work in Illuminati.[1] In addition, most of the members of Freemasons are Jews.

307505_291364357558130_159711423_n

You can see more from the following urls:

1 http://wup-forum.com/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=19872&start=100
2 http://wup-forum.com/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=19872&start=120
3 http://www.illuminati-symbols.com/illuminati-symbols.html

[1]The Illuminati is basically the government and they worship satan. They control all of the media. Many of the presidents or prime ministers of any country work for them and implement their agenda secretly. Their symbol is seen everywhere. If anyone looks close s/he would see it. It’s on tv everyday. It’s in these music videos. It’s even in politics.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7b_T2Iqnih4

What is Freemasonry / Illuminati by Sheikh Imran Hosein
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6c3g1AaPSDY
——

SOURCE

Austria presidential election: Far-right Freedom Party ‘comes top in vote’ Adam Withall The Independent

Screen Shot 2016-04-25 at 9.49.58 AM

Screen Shot 2016-04-25 at 9.50.50 AM

Austria presidential election: Far-right Freedom Party ‘comes top in vote’
Norbert Hofer has run a pro-gun, anti-immigrant, anti-Europe campaign
AdamWithnall@adamwithnall

?Austria’s far-right, anti-immigrant party has come out comfortably on top in Austria’s presidential vote.

Early results released by the country’s election authorities appear to show the candidate of the right-wing Freedom Party taking 35 per cent of the vote, leaving his two establishment rivals with not much more than 10 per cent each.

Norbert Hofer has run on a pro-gun manifesto, carrying his Glock pistol with him on the campaign trail and declaring that the public arming themselves is a logical reaction to the influx of refugees as part of the pan-European crisis.

The initial results showed great voter dissatisfaction with Austria’s main political parties, and came as part of a wider trend of anti-establishment lurches across the continent.

Opinion polling prior to Sunday’s vote had put Alexander Van der Bellen, a radical environmentalist and himself the son of refugees, marginally ahead of Mr Hofer.

Screen Shot 2016-04-25 at 9.51.53 AM

He and fellow independent Irmgard Griss took around 20 per cent each, according to the early results.

One of those two is expected to face Mr Hofer in a run-off on 22 May. The results of that election are expected to be much closer, with moderate voters rallying around the remaining candidate.

Sunday’s exit poll, if confirmed, would represent the Freedom Party’s best ever result in national elections.

If Ms Griss were to come through to take victory, meanwhile, she would be Austria’s first female president.

Mr Hofer’s success reflects recent polls showing Freedom Party popularity. Driven by concerns over Europe’s migrant crisis, support for his party in general has surged to 32 per cent compared with just over 20 per cent for each of the governing parties.

But voters were unhappy with the main Social Democrats and People’s Party even before the migrant crisis last year forced their coalition government to shift from open borders to tough asylum restrictions. Their bickering over key issues — most recently tax, pension and education reform — has fed perceptions of political stagnation.
——
SOURCE

Fredrick Töben reviews Gerard Menuhin’s new book

Fredrick Töben reviews Gerard Menuhin’s new book

Screen Shot 2016-04-14 at 6.50.15 AM
Gerard Menuhin: Tell the Truth and Shame the Devil
A review by Fredrick Töben

Fredrick Toben

The book has no chapters but divides into four sections, which makes for challenging reading:

I–to p 162: Thwarted: Humanity’s Last Grasp For Freedom;
II–to p 294: Identified: Illumination Or The Diagnostic Of Darkness;
III–to p 366: Extinguished: Civilization;
IV–to p 457: Final Stage: Communist Vassalage.

Section I: Thwarted:
Humanity’s Last Grasp For Freedom

The heading conveys a grave, almost certainly a pessimistic message, and so with pencil in hand I begin to read through the section and immediately notice how Menuhin’s autobiographical account of his awakening to the German problem begins at home in England between the expressed views of his mother and father on the gassing allegations. His mother reminds him that had he been about in Germany during the war, then he would have been gassed, while his father, Yehudi – 1916-1999, the world renowned violinist – never talks about the war. This creates a conceptual dissonance that is further accentuated through Menuhin spending a year at the primary section of the private Salem boarding school at Lake Constance where he feels the German children around him are just like any other children. And later he also realizes that it does not make sense to him that a highly cultured nation, such as Germany has always been, could have become a part of a genocidal plan to exterminate the Jews. The final straw moment, so to speak, occurs when he is engaged in cleaning up his late grandparents’ home and finds copies of Gerhard Frey’s National-Zeitung.
In this weekly Munich-based nationalist newspaper he finds that his grandfather, Moshe Menuhin, 1893-1983, had written regular columns for Frey’s paper. In 1965 his grandfather had also come to prominence by publishing the explosive book: The Decadence of Judaism in Our Time, wherein he claims that Zionism as a political movement enslaves Jews to anti-Semitism and racism.
As the chronological narrative progresses it becomes obvious to the reader that here is a person who has seriously reflected upon the 12-year National Socialist history of Germany, and especially upon the development of the Holocaust narrative. For the die-hard Revisionist it is good once again to see how this narrative of the six million killed Jews was developed very early, just after the turn of the 19th century. So, only half a century after the matter was fixed in legal concrete by the Nuremberg International Military Tribunal’s lynching frenzy, the actual “Holocaust protection laws” are enacted in various European countries.
Menuhin writes:
Those 6 million had to disappear in “burning ovens.” So 6 million Jews had to be gassed and end up in burning ovens to fulfill the prophecies and satisfy the Talmud Torah dogmatism – a necessary adjunct to the financial entrepreneurs – of Israel’s legitimacy, according to their covenant with their God. – p 12.
He cites from the 1985 Toronto Ernst Zündel trial where then considered credible eye-witness Rudolf Vrba and expert historian Raoul Hilberg are effectively demolished. It is the last time in the world where the factual claims made by any Holocaust survivor or historian are subjected to cross examination. From then on it is deemed to be an insult to question any aspect of the narrative for truth content.
Of interest is how Menuhin’s reflections on the past are brought up to date by his weaving into the narrative continuous snippets, sometimes as single items, then also as a collection of items, entitled Memo(s)from today.
His first Memo from today, at page 25, introduces a seemingly unrelated story about Martin Amis, son of Kingsley Amis, who has to date written inconsequential novels, and now surprisingly has produced his first novel about “the Holocaust” – The Zone of Interest. Here is a brief summary of the book:
The Zone of Interest is the fourteenth novel by the English author Martin Amis, published in 2014. Set in Auschwitz, it tells the story of a Nazi officer who has become enamored of the camp commandant’s wife.
Now Menuhin’s caustic remark about Kingsley’s latest book is telling because as a native English writer, Menuhin expects Kingsley’s command of the best universal language, English, to be almost perfect – with hard work, of course:
Junior does share one quality with his late father; he likes to wrestle with major political issues, without understanding their nature … Senior was a serious novelist of undeniable stature; Junior is just a short writer who takes himself too seriously; a lightweight who tries to engage with weighty subjects. Belatedly, but expediently for a New Yorker, he has discovered the “Holocaust,” a theme of greater interest if of a slighter substance than the state of his teeth, one with which he had previously been associated. – p 25.
After this brief interlude by focusing on a “wordmongerer” Menuhin plunges into the depth of his topic by focusing on the expression “emigration” and “extermination”, quotes from TAZ, the Berlin’s daily newspaper of 24 May 1995, which reveals that the Yad Vashem memorial site had been planned as early as 1942, then hits the first bulls-eye:
A good lie takes time to plan, and this was a very good lie; one which a defeated and demoralized enemy was in no position to refute. Misrepresent the purpose of a conventional delousing gas at the concentration camps, inflate the figures of typhus, typhoid and malnutrition deaths in the latter months of the war to match a symbolic figure, support with endless faked and staged photographs, purposely edited films and statistics, “find” a few “eyewitnesses” among the “survivors” – and the improbable becomes fact. Indeed, in the Nineties, it allegedly became offenkundig (common knowledge), an expression the German courts use themselves, when condemning courageous disputants to jail sentences of five years or more., for having indulged in Orwell’s “thoughtcrime,” just as the Inquisition convicted Galileo for daring to assert that the earth moves around the sun and not vice versa. Incidentally, it is said that Torquemada shared his ancestry with those who tyrannize Germans today. – p 26-27
[…]
Menuhin realizes how shonky such legal reasoning as Offenkundigkeit – taking judicial notice – really is:
In fact, an assertion of common knowledge is not a fact but only an opinion about a fact and so no proof at all – p. 27
He cites proof that the official story is a lie by referencing the serious material produced about the Holocaust by Rassinier, Faurisson, Rudolf, Leuchter, Graf, et al, then claims his second bulls-eye:
…but the most convincing proof of this can be imputed from the lasting benefits these events [he includes the N.Y tower incidents of 2001, refusing to call it 9-11] have brought their perpetrators and propagandists. (“Cui bono?”) – p 27.
His second Memos from today, is also instructive. In More propaganda from the cottage industry, Menuhin quotes Aristotle:
Tolerance and apathy are the last virtues of a dying society”, which he links to the “European Statute of Tolerance’s Section 7 seeks to criminalize hate crimes, incitement to violence, group libel and overt approval of a totalitarian ideology, xenophobia, anti-feminism or anti-Semitism, among other offenses, and details that “juveniles convicted of committing crimes listed [above] will be required to undergo a rehabilitation program designed to instill in them a culture of tolerance.” P 28-29
[…]

 

The third Memo from today is dated 4 April 2015 and Menuhin expresses his disdain at learning that pupils at the music school founded by his father, Yehudi Menuhin School, encourages students to visit Auschwitz. He asks:
Why should Jews continue to expend so much energy and money on “Holocaust” propaganda? They have already induced most leaders of governments, major companies, and ambitious public personalities to accept their views, but maybe they still fear the few informed voices which persist in exposing the historical truth, especially in education. – 31-32.
Another Memo from today features a transcription of an NBC News item of 26 January 2015, wherein a 90-year-old, Gena Turgel, recounts how she escaped the Auschwitz gas chamber as well as testings by Mengele! At Bergen Belsen she shared a barrack with dying teenager Anne Frank. Today she still wears a lot of perfume because this helps her block out the stench of the camps. And she still suffers because the Germans shot her 17-year-old sister, Miriam, for smuggling food into Plaszov, who used to sleep with her on the left side. Today she still feels a constant chill along her left arm. Tears well in her eyes but they do not fall because “to cry in Auschwitz could have you shot.” Menuhin sums up the pathetic fabrication in this Memo thus:
Auschwitz + 6 million + gas chamber + Anne Frank + Mengele = death march? Overdoing it? Not as long as there’s a gullible audience.– p 39
The Memo for today at page 41 is explosive in content in so far as it reveals in what kind of straightjacket Germans find themselves:
Critical voices in Israel warn that a new generation of Germans might call for a normalization of relations with Israel and might not want any longer to support Israel unconditionally despite the historical guilt of the Holocaust. (Neue Zürcher Zeitung, February 27, 2014)
Israeli writer Chen Ben-Eliyahu wrote in an op-ed column for Israel National News [that] Israel will reverse the “final solution”: “Twenty to 30 atomic bombs on Berlin, Munich, Hamburg, Nuremberg, Cologne, Frankfurt, Stuttgart, Dresden, Dortmund and so on will assure the job gets done. … And the land will then be quiet for a thousand years.” (www.thetimesofIsrael.com, March 11, 2015.
[…]
What some readers will now find disturbing is how Gerard Menuhin successfully rehabilitates the common image the world has of Adolf Hitler – absolute evil incarnate. Many Germans have attempted to do this without success. We recall how Austria is still holding Wolfgang Fröhlich, among others, in prison on a charge of attempting to rehabilitate “Nazism”! And Germany’s Section 130 of the Criminal Code – defaming the memory of the dead – has subjected Horst Mahler to 12 years’ prison.
Menuhin asks simple questions:
Did Hitler have a sense of humour? Not only did he have a sense of humour, he was not above making fun of himself; … Did he respond to beautiful things, to art, architecture, to music, to books? …His personal library is estimated to have encompassed 16,300 books. …He was immune from the blandishments of unearned recognition. …No more suitable individual could have led a country, particularly Germany, at that time. No member of the established section of society could have succeeded where he did;
He then makes a detailed reference to Hitler’s Sportpalast speech of 10 February 1933, stating:
This hour-long speech is recommended to anyone who understands German. Its passionate condemnation of all that was wrong then rings as true now as it did in 1933 and is therefore a telling indictment of the false progress civilization has made since them. Its ardent faith in a better future is overwhelmingly convincing.
Menuhin even takes the sting out of National Socialist’s alleged “racism” by citing from Norman Cantor’s book, The Sacred Chain. A History of the Jews, where it is clearly stated how –
racism is itself a central doctrine in traditional Judaism and Jewish cultural history. The Hebrew Bible is blatantly racist, with all the talk about the seed of Abraham, the chosen people, and Israel as the light to the other nations. Orthodox Jews in their morning prayers still thank God daily that he did not make Jews ‘like other people on earth.’ – p 107
Of course, philosopher Martin Heidegger also expresses Jewish racism quite succinctly in his recently released Black Books, which caused him to be accused of making “anti-Semitic” statements:
The Jews, with their marked gift for calculating, live, already for the longest time, according to the principle of race, which is why they are resisting its consistent application with utmost violence.
Menuhin then continues to narrate his detailed and multi-layered comprehensive view of how Hitler and Germany slipped into a war they did not want but which Churchill and the Allies and international Jewry-global capitalism so desperately wanted:
It is a wonder that Hitler prevailed as long as he did despite this constant betrayal, sabotage, and corruption, and further proof of the trust in him of the vast majority of German citizens. Present generations have been re-educated to dignify these traitors as “the resistance”. … These developments are an early example of coercive diplomacy, followed by active regime change. Interestingly the policy of the representatives of the British Empire/City of London closely resembles that of the U.S.A. today. Presumably, this is no coincidence, as the driving force behind each remains the same. – p 131.
[…]

Ballot paper of leaving the League of Nations

As Part One concludes the reader will further discover interesting snippets of historical significance not found in traditional views of this period of history. Menuhin’s grasp of this vexed topic is multi-layered and he succeeds in clearly fleshing out the German-hatred as expressed by those who saw themselves representing mainstream Judaism. Among other things, World War Two was thus a war between Germanism and Judaism, which Richard Wagner had already faced during the 1850s. The implied theme here is that Judaism has latched on to the Germanic mindset as has been revealed through the Coudenhove-Kalergi Plan, on whose foundation, for example, the European Union rests.

* * * *

[I am skipping now to a passage from Section IV – Final Stage-Communist Vassalage
You can read the entire review in the Adelaide Institute Newsletter 919, January 2016.]
Toben writes:
Instead of detailing his self-reflective exposé any further I shall conclude the review of his book by quoting five paragraphs at length. This should animate anyone interested in this subject to get the book so as to enable the reader, directly and unmediated, to experience Gerard Menuhin’s insightful and delicate mind at work.
So, for about four years, I tried to correct the record, or more precisely, I joined the band of so-called “Revisionists” who proclaim their controversial conclusions. A complete waste of time and energy and dangerous into the bargain. You cannot reverse with words, however sincere and persuasive – even with evidence – the effects of the intrigues and deceptions of centuries, nor elucidate for the uninformed the driving force behind them: an eternal and institutionalized hatred and envy of those with roots and culture.
If you are Jewish yourself, and you point the finger at Jews for their skullduggery, you must either be insane or hate yourself, or possibly both, they say. You hate them, so you hate yourself. Hmmm. The only sense I can make of this is that, having recognized the terrible harm Jews have done to the world and continue to do to it, some Jews hate themselves for being Jewish. Well, that may indeed be so. The first “Jewish self-hater” may have been the Judean Jesus himself, the itinerant preacher who castigated the money-lenders, thus revealing to the Pharisees that he was not the useful leader they had been expecting, and sealing his fate. In my case, as I’ve said, not being actually a Jew according to their laws, I can’t hate myself for this. Hatred is, in any case, a consuming emotion and thus an unhealthy one.
However, it is hard not to hate them for destroying ancient regions I would have liked to visit: Lebanon, Syria, Libya; or for their rootlessness, for their parasitism, for their inhumanity, for their perpetual lies, for their lack of a credible culture; for ruining my world, a world of natural and man-made beauty, through wars and endless avariciousness – for absolutely no reason at all except to gain control of it, through a so-called New World Order, leading to a Jewish World Government. “We will have world government, whether or not we like it. The question is only whether world government will be achieved by consent or by conquest.” (Paul Warburg, co-founder of the Federal Reserve, member of the Council on Foreign Relations, February 17, 1950.)
As an aesthete, I am repulsed by their severe appearance deficit (the more symmetrical physique of some Israelis only emphasizes their Khazar ancestry.) Their character must imbue their countenance: ugly thoughts, ugly names, ugly language, ugly people. (Constant lying in their cause must uglify too, look at Merkel.) “For as he thinketh in his heart, so is he.”

 

(Proverbs 23:7). “The show of their countenance doth witness against them; and they declare their sin as Sodom, they hide it not. Woe onto their soul! For they have rewarded evil unto themselves.” (Isaiah, 3:9).
Hollywood Jews, of which ever gender have often had their names altered and their features regularized, of course, so that they have become unrecognizable, but the basic orthodox Lumpen Jew, with or without black hats and sidelocks, to be seen hanging around the synagogue or the airport, waiting for others of his ilk to arrive, his bloated stomach forcing his white shirt to hang over the trousers of his black suit, is an odious creature. Here you have him, stuffed with kosher food, every pore exuding otherness. (On the subject of food, it is revelatory to inform oneself about the Kosher tax imposed on a very large number of domestic products, including many non-food items. Companies that object to this uniquely Jewish protection racket are labeled “anti-Semitic”.) This is a malevolent pest on the move, in body as in mind. These are just the foot soldiers of the cause and expendable, but their presumption betrays the ever-increasing success of their masters. – p 388-89.
His final words are telling:
Yet, as the German saying has it: “Truth obligates; who keeps silent concurs. – Wahrheit verpflichtet, wer schweigt stimmt zu. Peace between humans should be the norm on Earth. Yet to achieve this normal state requires all our energy. My father said: “Peace may sound simple – one beautiful word – but it requires everything we have, every quality, every strength, every dream, every high ideal.” My father tried to generate peace with his music. I have inherited a duty to do the same in the only way I can.
– and Gerard Menuhin has magnificently succeeded in fulfilling this monumental task of telling the truth by writing a book about it and thereby also keeping the flame of hope alive.

* * *
Fredrick Töben
Adelaide – 5 January 2016

 

Happy Birthday Tribute to Adolf Hitler! (April 20, 1889 – April 30, 1945) from Diane King

Screen Shot 2016-04-20 at 1.02.55 PM

AH T

Panzerlied:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ALC3Hmp3QJc  and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8JDkdc246QQ

AH Z

THE HITLER SPEECH THEY DON’T WANT YOU TO HEAR:

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G57GKUtWzNs

HITLER’S SPEECH WITH SUBTITLES:

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EV9kyocogKo&ebc=ANyPxKr6nodROT7bZyBgsY8ZpOYvfs3q7mh0JiigSh4HdguFa_G06qge_JmL6YFNggQlKpT9a-cavSPypPb8U_kvSaRWA-5Dpw

Screen Shot 2016-04-20 at 12.50.46 PM

HORST WESSEL LIED – WEHRMACHT MARCHING TO NATIONAL SOCIALIST PARTY SONG:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MD6oDnm43HA

PREUSSIANS GLORIA MARSCH (WEHRMACHT):

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNJWEFPYu8E

DER KOENIGGRATZER MARSCH:

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EDvY5gY0x-k

Screen Shot 2016-04-20 at 1.03.31 PM

Screen Shot 2016-04-20 at 12.52.21 PM

The New World Order Is Universally Chaotic by Jonas E. Alexis and Gerard Menuhin

NWO3Hdr

The New World Order Is Universally Chaotic
by Jonas E. Alexis and Gerard Menuhin, Veterans Today
April 15, 2016

“Every time we see some politician on television, pontificating about the benefits of some scheme which is obviously against the interests of the majority of any population, we must remind ourselves that he is just being paid to lie.”
~ Gerard Mehunin, Author of Tell the Truth and Shame the Devil

Alexis: You argue that “The only winners of the World Wars were the politicians and bankers who instigated them. The politicians were not representatives of their peoples but traitors; the bankers by their trade were cosmopolites. It followed that the benefits of these conflagrations were so significant that they eclipsed the importance of the estimated 76 million who left their lives while fighting in them. Since finance backed both sides in a ‘managed conflict,’ the citizens of both sides were left to foot the bill.”[1]

This is an important point. The war in Iraq for example will cost the average American at least $6 trillion.[2] Neither George W. Bush nor the Neocons who spearheaded the war will suffer from it. In fact, those same Neocons, most specifically people like Daniel Pipes, want to use perpetual wars to destroy countries like Syria.

With respect to the World Wars, you argue that “In the interval between the first and second acts, the Versailles Treaty, with its impossible demands, was imposed, in order to ensure that the looting could continue.”[3] You also quote Winston Churchill elsewhere saying that “Everything tends towards catastrophe and collapse. I am interested and geared up and happy.” Expand on that statement a bit. Tell us how the oligarchs used political manipulation to bludgeon the West into the World Wars.

Menuhin: What is an oligarch? An oligarch may not only be a business magnate but a powerful individual too. ‘Oligarch: member of oligarchy. Oligarchy: Government, State governed by the few.’ (Greek, oligoi few, arkho rule, Oxford Concise Dictionary) It all depends on their purpose.

When we think of oligarchs, we usually mean the Russians who came to their riches during alcoholic President Yeltsin’s reign (Beresowski, Abramovich, Khodorkovsky, etc.), with the advice of Harvard’s Jeffrey Sachs. The word ‘oligarch’ implies a quality of banditry, a frontier spirit, which we in the West attribute to primitive societies.

However, ‘The most civilized people are as near to barbarism as the most polished steel is to rust. Nations, like metals, have only a superficial brilliancy’ (Antoine de Rivarol). Some might dispute whether the U.S. is truly civilized. It was ‘discovered’ in the 15th century, colonized in the 17th century, its indigenous inhabitants tamed or exterminated, and then re-occupied by the money powers in the 18th , 19th, and 20th centuries, crowning their efforts with the institution of the Fed.

Britain had been infected with the pestilence as early as 1066 and capitulated entirely by 1694; France in 1789. 1913 was a key year for the money powers in America. It saw the establishment of the Fed, of income taxes, and of the ADL, created to prevent criticism of Jews, by the same powers who wave the magic wand over those designated to become oligarchs.

By the time the enormous landmass that is Russia became a target, North America had been captured by its own oligarchs. Oil, transport and the media had been monopolized. Carnegie, Harriman, Mellon, Morgan, Rockefeller are some of the most famous of the original 19th century ‘robber barons’, but there are plenty of other present-day pillars of U.S. society, who also began as oligarchs.

How can one ‘begin’ as an oligarch? Well, oligarchism doesn’t involve becoming in a regular way. It involves a sudden – to the external world inexplicable — boost in fortune. It doesn’t necessarily include a learning curve, or a brilliant invention. Inventions can be stolen, learning is on the job. It’s more an endowment, or assignment.

Ethnicity isn’t always essential; a suitable character is. Some oligarchs have both. The required traits are: opportunism, indifference, venality. But oligarchs are all chosen for their willingness to endorse a New World Order. Briefly put, the New World Order requires universal chaos to be caused by means of a ‘strategy of tension’ (false flag terrorist action) which, in turn, requires a new order to be imposed, ‘for the good of the people’.

Clearly, this change from a stable to an unstable society cannot occur overnight. It must be guided by hand-picked politicians, major foundations (created by the oligarchs), and ostensibly well-meaning, convincingly-named organizations like the Southern Poverty Law Center or the NAACP.

Populations must be degraded and dumbed down by means of expensive but devalued education, senseless entertainment, noxious nutrition and its ensuing disorders and addictions, and harmful pharmaceutical medication.[4]

The young must be indoctrinated in subjects supported by generous university endowments, and infiltrated by egalitarian principles, like ‘Equal Opportunity’ and Women’s Rights, which purport to seek only what sounds utterly reasonable and desirable (‘Liberté, Fraternité, Egalité), but, in fact, are driven by quite other long term motives. This plan has been ongoing since the late 19th century and is now nearing fruition.[5]

In the occupied countries, populations have succumbed to ‘Representative Democracy’, as exemplified by the parliamentary system. By and large, even under the politics of controlled opposition in the parliamentary system, populations are a nuisance. They must be allowed only as much choice as will lull them into apathy and the illusion that they enjoy basic freedoms, like freedom of expression, until the new world order takes form and they can be dominated completely.

No electorate is genuinely empowered to choose a popular leader. Should, as a result of a breakdown in oversight, a popular leader be elected (Chavez in Venezuela, Morales in Bolivia, earlier, Peron in Argentina), they are threatened by corrupt ‘opposition’, backed by external powers, and, almost inevitably, overthrown by a coup.

Oligarchs exist and flourish all over the world. Particularly in the unsettled or rebellious countries, they play a useful role. The Ukraine, for instance, is run, officially and unofficially, by oligarchs, actually successful gangsters who stop at nothing to get what they want.

In the Ukraine, ethnicity has been a major factor since the 8th century Khazar conversion. Practically all business and media in the Ukraine is in the hands of Jewish oligarchs, some of them previous communist party apparatchiks. In such unruly countries, where government is still unsettled, oligarchs must control their fiefdoms by violence; in secured or occupied countries, where governments have been accustomed to obeying the money powers for centuries, oligarchs may simply act as placeholders for wealth transfers from alleged foes, like Russia.

In unsettled countries, people are still marginally free. That is, they may be shot for expressing a genuine desire for choice/freedom. That explains why countries previously ruled from Moscow are unwilling to submit to the dictates of the EU now. They refuse to accept hordes of refugees. In the secured countries, opposition is often feigned, or instigated only to confuse citizens. Decades of dumbing down and debt-acquired benefits have ensured that any genuine resistance seldom occurs and is easily quelled with a few whiffs of teargas.

So how do you get to be an oligarch? How does a nobody from nowhere become enormously wealthy, or president of a country? Who gives them their jump-start?

One can only go by probability. Essential is, obviously, to search for a suitable person among those to whom money means everything. This qualification alone reduces the quest to a certain ethnicity, although not exclusively. Probably, a young, malleable person (often an orphan) comes to the attention of those who make these decisions and is put on the right track. (One can almost picture a line-up of protégés being interviewed by the local rabbi.)

Those who prove unsuitable may have to be discarded, but the attractions are so great that the chosen must hardly ever disappoint their mentors. Eventually, you have a structure in which politics (e.g. Clinton, Obama) and business (e.g. Murdoch) are in lockstep. They perform on demand and are allowed their private weaknesses, no matter how deplorable. Most likely, they would never have been chosen, had they not exhibited a potential weakness in the first place. In this way, the ones who really pull the strings and whose ethnicity is unvaried can stay in the background.

Take, for example, Roman Abramovich. Depending on whom you believe:

‘Abramovich, the son of Jewish parents from Saratow on the Volga, was an early orphan and school dropout from the provinces, who became a powerful oil and metals tycoon during the Yeltsin era. When Abramovich was one and a half years old, his mother Irina, a piano teacher, died of blood poisoning (the result of an illegal abortion), at four, he lost his father Arkadi too, in a work-related accident (he was knocked down by a construction crane).’ (Metapedia, translated from the German)

‘(Abramovich) first worked as a street-trader and then as a mechanic at a local factory. At the peak of perestroika, Abramovich sold imported rubber ducks from his Moscow apartment. He attended the Gubkin Institute of Oil and Gas in Moscow (where he sold retreaded car tires as a sideline), then traded commodities for Runicom, a Swiss trading company.

‘In 1988, as perestroika opened up opportunities for privatization in the Soviet Union, Abramovich got a chance to legitimize his old business. He and Olga set up a company making dolls. Within a few years his wealth spread from oil conglomerates to pig farms and he also started investing in other businesses.’ (Wikipedia)

Possibly, the mysterious boost in Abramovich’s entrepreneurial fortunes occurred between the rubber duck venture and his induction into the Institute of Oil and Gas. Presumably, his success at selling bath toys did not integrate seamlessly into the stratosphere of a billionaire. Today, Abramovich owns three of the world’s largest yachts and the Chelsea football team. How much time such amusements allow him for ‘business’ is debatable.

The father of Abramovich’s mentor, Berezovsky, was, like Abramovich’s, a construction worker, who then moved to Moscow and became a rabbi (Metapedia). The mystery of how Berezovsky and Abramovich acquired Russia’s largest energy provider (Sibneft, now Gazprom) and probably were used to export its ownership to the UK where they both live(d) — in 2013, Berezovsky was found suspended by his scarf from a shower rail — is explained by  the action of the third oligarch in this trio, Khodorkovsky, who left the shares of his oil firm, Yukos, to Jacob Rothschild, when Putin had him arrested in 2003. Gazprom is based in Moscow, but its profits may not remain there.

MarchofTyranny

In the case of Europe’s latest political pawns, an additional curious commonality is their small stature: France’s Sarkozy and Hollande, Italy’s Berlusconi, Russia’s Medvedev, Germany’s Heiko Maas are all very small men, at a time when humans are growing taller. Apart from their smallness, each would reveal under scrutiny some standard deficiency which has rendered them serviceable.

Conversely, none of them is interesting in his own right (except perhaps as a study in pathology), or statesmanlike, or distinguished. These marionettes are not stupid, but they were perhaps not very good at their chosen professions. Lack of ability is more than made up by ambition.

Churchill, a political turncoat, was the perfect example of such a character. He was infinitely adaptable and cared only for luxury and personal aggrandizement. Judging by the famous photograph of him with the cigar and sub-machine gun, he liked to think of himself as a sort of upper class gangster.

“Everything tends towards catastrophe and collapse. I am interested, geared up and happy. Is it not horrible to be built like that? The preparations have a hideous fascination for me” (Letter to his wife, 28 July, 1914).

By 1914, all the second-ranking kingpins were in place and financed to ensure that the plan for world domination could take the next great step: the imposition of ’Communism’ (false socialism) on Russia. For Communism to have a chance, Tsarist Russia had to be weakened. Japan had been backed by Rothschild front Schiff against Russia in 1904 – 1905, but the 1905 Russian revolution was premature.

Obviously a greater conflagration was required. The fuse for World War I was lit with the assassination by Serbs of Archduke Franz Ferdinand at Sarajevo in June 1914 (planned by the Grand Orient Lodge in 1912). Russian politicians Iswolski and Sasonow, rather than Nicholas II, colluded with France’s President Poincaré (a Germanophobe, married to a Jewess), and were financed by France to spread anti-Austria/Germany propaganda.

Germany, as the main target, had to be enticed into the conflict. Each of the major powers, Germany, Britain and France, received loans from its own Rothschild affiliate, to enable it to fight the war. Even before the turn of the century, Russia had received loans from ‘French’ banks Hoskier-Paribas and Rothschild.

To ensure the manipulation of public opinion, the money powers bought the most important news agencies: Wolff (Germany), Reuters (Britain), Havas (France). Their control of these agencies also enabled the Rothschilds to keep their name out of the news.

During the First World War, Churchill, having advanced meanwhile to First Sea Lord, instigated the catastrophic 1915/1916 Gallipoli campaign (115,000 British and dominion casualties).

“I know this war is smashing and shattering the lives of thousands every moment –and yet –I cannot help it—I love every second I live.” (Letter to Asquith’s daughter Violet, 22 February, 1915).

During the Second World War, Churchill fulfilled his role, once he had been saved from bankruptcy and incorrect political views, by a genetic helper and thus reminded of his duty to this mother’s ethnicity. Ever unsuitable in his position, he was responsible for the failed Norway campaign, even before he became Prime Minister. If Chamberlain had remained prime minister, the war might not have occurred, or might have been curtailed, the U.S. might not have been able to participate, Germany might have defeated Soviet Russia, etc.

“… the powers of financial capitalism had another far reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole.” (Tragedy and Hope, Carroll Quigley, 1966)

The collusion of business and politics, of ethnic oligarchs and politicians, is clearly illustrated by the photograph of Churchill and Bernard Baruch in the back of Baruch’s limousine in 1944. Baruch, a major force behind the War Industries Board, had left the NYSE (on which he had bought a seat), to ‘advise’ both Woodrow Wilson and Roosevelt, both of whom performed ideally for their handlers, for some of the same reasons as mentioned above.

FDR had been diagnosed with polio already in 1921. As for his wife, she shared certain of Hillary Clinton’s preferences, which, while ordinary these days, were scandalous then. And so it continues.

Every time we see some politician on television, pontificating about the benefits of some scheme which is obviously against the interests of the majority of any population, we must remind ourselves that he is just being paid to lie. The marriage of money and politics, in the service of a plan conceived by mercenary hominids, will prove the downfall of humanity.

——

[1] Gerard Menuhin, Tell the Truth and Shame the Devil (Washington: The Barnes Review, 2015), 367.

[2] David Lazarus, “Iraq war cost: $6 trillion. What else could have been done?,” LA Times, March 18, 2013; Michael B Kelley and Geoffrey Ingersoll, “The Iraq War Could Cost More Than $6 Trillion,” Business Insider, March 14, 2013; Bob Dreyfuss, “The $6 Trillion Wars,” The Nation, March 29, 2013; “Iraq War Cost U.S. More Than $2 Trillion, Could Grow to $6 Trillion, Says Watson Institute Study,” Huffington Post, March 14, 2013.

[3] Menuhin, Tell the Truth and Shame the Devil, 325.

[4] For studies on some of these issues, see for example David Healey, Let Them Eat Prozac: The Unhealthy Relationship Between the Pharmaceutical Industry and Depression (New York: New York University Press, 2006); Pharmageddon (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 2012); Ronald William Maris, Pillaged: Psychiatric Medications and Suicide Risk (Columbia: University of South Carolina, 2015); Robert Whitaker, Anatomy of an Epidemic: Magic Bullets, Psychiatric Drugs, and the Astonishing Rise of Mental Illness in America (New York: Random House, 2012); Peter R. Breggin, Toxic Psychiatry: Why Therapy, Empathy and Love Must Replace the Drugs, Electroshock, and Biochemical Theories of the “New Psychiatry” (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1991); Peter Gotzsche, Deadly Medicines and Organised Crime: How Big Pharma Has Corrupted Healthcare (New York and London: Radcliffe Publishing, 2013).

[5] See for example E. Michael Jones, Degenerate Moderns: Modernity as Rationalized Sexual Misbehavior (South Bend: Fidelity Press, 2012).

deviltruth

: SOURCE

When fiction becomes fact by John Kaminski

RockwellPainting

When fiction 

becomes fact

Our reality is based on manipulated events

By John Kaminski

pseudoskylax@gmail.com

I was reminded of the difference between what people believe happened and what actually happened the other day at the beach when I ran into a woman from Boston who was exploring the joys of the Florida shore near where I live. After she told me where she was from, I mentioned that long ago I used to run a print shop in Copley Square and she immediately responded, “Oh, that’s right near where the bomb went off.”

Not content with reflexively connecting her memory to my remark, she felt the need to add, “Those boys certainly got what they deserved!”

As I was toweling off my hair, I had the immediate impulse to begin to explain that the many hours of research I had devoted to the controversial event known as the Boston Marathon bombing had clearly revealed to me that the two young Chechen brothers had nothing to do with the crime except to be falsely blamed as its perpetrators. The conclusion was based on an avalanche of available evidence, but really hinged on one simple fact: prosecutors claimed the bomb to be in a black backpack and the younger brother was clearly shown to be carrying a white one, which was later conveniently photoshopped out of a picture of him leaving the scene.

But I stifled my impulse to explain all this to a stranger I’d just met, and she sauntered happily away amid the scent of salt air and the screeches of sea gulls.

There is a real danger in challenging what people have come to believe about world events. When you question what people have established in their own minds, it is as if you are threatening their lives, and they can react violently to such an open attack on the way they understand things to be.

So as I stood there mulling over the mini scene that had so concisely encapsulated the last 15 years of my life — all devoted to getting people to see what the perverts who control reality didn’t want them to see — I realized then, as I had done a thousand times before, that history rolls on based upon the lies that are told about events that have happened, and the truth of these events, in the minds of most ordinary people, is never really revealed, at least in a way that they can fully understand the reasons for these horrible things to have happened in the first place.

And it doesn’t really matter which of these events you talk about. 9/11, World War II, the bankruptcy of America?

The criminals who execute these diabolical deceptions are always aided by a vast network of conscripted conspirators eager to assist in promoting the false narratives of these events, like the cops who look the other way, the reporter who leaves out a few key facts, or the politician who seizes on these superficial fictions, histrionically advocates for war and changes the course of world history.

The catastrophe du jour in today’s world is the jailing of would be patriots now incarcerated in Oregon and Las Vegas, straightforward and sincere folks who merely wanted to protest the encroachments of the federal government on private land throughout the Western United States who are now being held practically incommunicado and in solitary confinement for their daring to challenge the unjust jailing of two farmers whose ranch happened to be situated on a piece of land suspected of containing uranium deposits that Hillary Clinton, of all people, desired to sell to the Russians for many millions of dollars.

And of course, the Bundys and their friends happened to be the same people who had prevented Sen. Harry Reid’s diabolical plan in Nevada to sell a large patch of federal grazing land, supposedly preserved by the government for public use, to the Chinese. For this and other affronts to the American police state, everyone who participated in these acts of overt patriotism, these exercises in defending the U.S. Constitution from the foreign tyrants who now control America, all now face up to 100 years in prison for their conscientious and principled behavior.

We all know the story of how an upstanding U.S. citizen named Lavoy Finicum was a victim of federal premeditated murder for his part in participating merely as a support person for Ammon Bundy and his friends as they harmlessly and symbolically occupied the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge to protest the unfair double jeopardy prosecution of the Hammonds whose farm contains the suspected uranium.

All this federal abuse of innocent, well meaning citizens contrasts nicely with the sale of illegal weapons to Mexican drug gangs by U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder or the squealing glee displayed by the aforesaid Hillary Clinton over the vicious murders of Libyan leader Muammar Qaddafi and U.S. ambassador Christopher Stevens as a demonstration of the officially sanctioned criminality of the so-called American government, which is no longer an organization representing the interests and protecting the welfare of the American people, but a hired sadistic hit squad for international gangsters owned and operated by insatiable psychopaths of the Jewish persuasion.

To chronicle all the demonic depredations of the U.S. government in a single story is beyond impossible. But to mention just one item that is irrevocably changing the character of the country would be to spotlight the secret program to flood America with illiterate immigrants, ease their inclusion into the American electorate with all sorts of perks and considerations unavailable to ordinary citizens, and then get them to vote for the party that has given them all this free stuff as a way to cement the dependence of the populace on government handouts and therefore permanently eliminate all dissent by creating the risk of losing these addictive benefits (much in the way churches have been gulled into silence by the implied threat of losing their nonprofit status should they get the sudden urge to preach morality).

The entire history of the 20th century rests on these fictions, these murderous deceptions that have obliterated liberty and replaced it with Mafia-style obedience to the pleasures and pitfalls of corruption.

We have all been coerced into grasping at straws, faint facsimiles of freedom, while the war machine rages on and the crimes against the American continue to intensify and the freedoms we were once guaranteed by our long gone Constitution disappear into the mists of chemical poisons from the sky.

We have been reduced to seeking optimism where there is none in accepting the platitudes and pretensions of plastic presidential candidates, or in continuing to believe in a history that is a total lie.

Our country is totally controlled by a foreign power, the Jews of Washington, London, Frankfurt and Tel Aviv. All our past and present presidents as well as future candidates are all in the pockets of the Jews, making freedom and liberty for the American people a thoroughly unattainable goal at this time.

Our task is to become aware of this handicap in order to realistically aspire to the state of freedom and liberty that was promised to us by our forefathers but later taken away from us by traitors who accepted — and still accept today — the bribes of the Jews, if this task is still possible at this late date.

The alternative is to remain in this powerless foggy stupor in which we have no real control over our lives.

And the question becomes . . . do you have enough energy, and enough courage, to save your own life?

And if you do, what will you tell your children about the world they live in?

———

John Kaminski is a writer who lives on the Gulf Coast of Florida, constantly trying to figure out why we are destroying ourselves, and pinpointing a corrupt belief system as the engine of our demise. Solely dependent on contributions from readers, please support his work by mail: 6871 Willow Creek Circle #103, North Port FL 34287 USA.

http://therebel.is/kaminski

http://johnkaminski.info/

http://www.rudemacedon.ca/kaminski/kam-index.html

http://www.serendipity.li/john_kaminski_articles.htm

http://web.archive.org/web/20040323232319/http://johnkaminski.com/

HERE I STAND! (with God, not Israel) Martin Luther and the Protestant Reformation

Martin Luther

ATEDITOR0216

[Editor’s Note: Not too long ago I read the story of Martin Luther life’s and work as well as the times that he lived in and other personalities of his day who were struggling to break away from the iron-fisted, tyrannical clutches of the Roman Catholic church. I was flabbergasted to read of the number of people who, once they were privy to the actual teachings of Jesus Christ (rather than Rome’s interpretations which the priests, up to that time, were feeding them), were willing to defend their right to follow the teachings themselves. Thousands of individuals ranging across the whole spectrum of society, ended up being burnt at the stake rather than going back to RC church and its dogmatic and decadent system of codes and rites that left believers at the mercy of the church.

While this short article gives the gist of Martin Luther’s work it also avoids his more controversial statements on the Jews which are contained in a small booklet that Martin Luther had published just prior to his ascension. That little booklet was called “On the Jews and their lies” and it outlines Luther’s efforts over his lifetime to try and convince the Jews that they should accept Jesus Christ as their messiah. It also exposes their many faults and deceptions and their influence within the Roman Catholic church itself.]

Here I Stand! Martin Luther & The Protestant Reformation

18 April marks the anniversary of a momentous turning point in world history. The Reformation was led by men of strong faith, deep convictions, great intelligence, high moral standards and tremendous courage. Towering above all these great Reformers, Martin Luther stands out as the most courageous, controversial and influential Reformer of all time.

Facing Certain Death

Summoned to Worms, Luther believed that he was going to his death. He insisted that his co-worker, Philip Melanchthon, remain in Wittenberg. “My dear brother, If I do not come back, if my enemies put me to death, you will go on teaching and standing fast in the truth; if you live, my death will matter little.” Luther at Worms was 37 years old. He had been excommunicated by the Pope. Luther would have remembered that the Martyr, John Hus, a Century before, had travelled to Constance with an imperial safe conduct, which was not honoured.

Determination

Luther declared: “Though Hus was burned, the truth was not burned, and Christ still lives… I shall go to Worms, though there be as many devils there as tiles on the roofs.” Luther’s journey to Worms was like a victory parade. Crowds lined the roads cheering the man who had dared to stand up for Germany against the Pope.

Before the Emperor

At 4 o’ clock on Wednesday 17 April, Luther stood before the rulers of the Holy Roman Empire. Charles V, Emperor of the Holy Roman Empire, ruled all the Austrian domains, Spain, Netherlands, a large part of Italy and the Americas. At 21 years old, Charles V ruled over a territory larger than any man since Charlemagne.

Amidst the pomp and splendour of this imperial gathering, stood the throne of the Emperor on a raised platform. It was flanked by Spanish knights in gleaming armour, 6 Princes, 24 Dukes, 30 Archbishops and Bishops, and 7 Ambassadors.

Confrontation

Luther was asked to identify whether the books on the table were his writings. Upon Luther’s confirmation that they were, an official asked Luther: “Do you wish to retract them, or do you adhere to them and continue to assert them?” Luther had come expecting an opportunity to debate the issues, but it was made clear to him that no debate was to be tolerated. The Imperial Diet was ordering him to recant all his writings. Luther requested more time, so that he might answer the question without injury to the Word of God and without peril to his soul. The Emperor granted him 24 hours.

A Date With Destiny

The next day, Thursday 18 April, as the sun was setting and torches were being lit, Luther was ushered into the august assembly. He was asked again whether he would recant what he had written. Luther responded that some of his books taught established Christian doctrine on faith and good works. He could not deny accepted Christian doctrines. Other of his books attacked the papacy and to retract these would be to encourage tyranny and cover up evil. In the third category of books, he had responded to individuals who were defending popery and in these Luther admitted he had written too harshly.

The examiner was not satisfied: “You must give a simple, clear and proper answer… will you recant or not?”

Christian Conviction and Courage

Luther’s response, first given in Latin and then repeated in German, shook the world: “Unless I am convinced by Scripture or by clear reasoning that I am in error – for popes and councils have often erred and contradicted themselves – I cannot recant, for I am subject to the Scriptures I have quoted; my conscience is captive to the Word of God. It is unsafe and dangerous to do anything against ones conscience. Here I stand. I cannot do otherwise. So help me God. Amen.”

Steadfast

Amidst the shocked silence, cheers rang out for this courageous man who had stood up to the Emperor and the Pope. Luther turned and left the tribunal. Numerous German nobles formed a circle around Luther and escorted him safely back to his lodgings.

Condemned

The Emperor was furious. However, Prince Frederick insisted that Charles V honour the guarantee of safe conduct for Luther. Charles V raged against “this devil in the habit of a monk” and issued the edict of Worms, which declared Luther an outlaw, ordering his arrest and death as a “heretic.”

Kidnapped

As Luther travelled back to Wittenberg, preaching at towns on the route, armed horsemen plunged out of the forest, snatched Luther from his wagon and dragged him off to Wartburg Castle. This kidnapping had been arranged by Prince Frederick amidst great secrecy in order to preserve Luther’s life. Despite the Emperor’s decree that anyone helping Luther was subject to the loss of life and property, Frederick risked his throne and life to protect his pastor and professor.

Wartburg Castle

For the 10 months that Luther was hidden at Wartburg Castle, as Knight George (Junker Jorg), he translated The New Testament into German and wrote such booklets as: “On Confession Whether the Pope Has the Authority to Require It; On the Abolition of Private Masses” and “Monastic Vows.” By 1522, The New Testament in German was on sale for but a week’s wages.

A Time of Change

The Reformation not only brought about sweeping changes in the church, but dramatic changes in all of society. First of all the Reformation focused on bringing doctrines, forms of church government, and of worship and daily life into conformity with the Word of God. But this of course had tremendous implications for political, economical, social and cultural life as well.

God’s Word Above All Things

Luther revised the Latin liturgy and translated it into German. Now the laity received the Communion in both bread and wine, as the Hussites had taught a Century earlier. The whole emphasis in church services changed from the sacramental celebration of the Mass as a sacrifice, to the preaching and teaching of God’s Word. Luther maintained that every person has the right and duty to read and study the Bible in his own language. This became the foundation of the Reformation: a careful study of the Bible as the source of all truth and as the only legitimate authority, for all questions of faith and conduct.

The True Church

The Church is a community of believers, not a hierarchy of officials. The Church is an organism rather than an organisation, a living body of which each believer is a member.

Luther stressed the priesthood of all believers. We do not gain salvation through the church, but we become members of the Church when we become believers.

Reformation Basic Principles

Luther dealt with many primary issues, including:

Authority – the Bible alone is our ultimate authority and not the councils or leaders of any Church. The Bible is above tradition.

Salvation – is by the grace of God alone, accomplished by the Atonement of Christ alone, received by faith alone. Grace comes before sacraments.

The Church – the true Church is composed of the elect, those regenerated by God’s Holy Spirit. Regenerate Church membership.

The Priesthood – consists of all true believers. The priesthood of all believers.

The Battle Cries of the Reformation

The Protestant Reformation mobilised by Luther rallied around these great battle cries:

Solus Christus – Christ alone is the Head of the Church.

Sola Scriptura – Scripture alone is our authority.

Sola Gratia – Salvation is by the grace of God alone.

Sola Fide – Justification is received by faith alone.

Soli Deo Gloria – Everything is to be done for the glory of God alone.

Luther Survived and Thrived

Despite Luther being declared an outlaw by the Emperor, he survived to minister and write for 25 more years, and died of natural causes, 18 February 1546. In spite of many illnesses, Luther remained very active and productive as an advisor to princes, Theologians and pastors, publishing major commentaries, producing great quantities of books and pamphlets, and he completed the translation of The Old Testament into German by 1534. Luther continued preaching and teaching to the end of his life. He frequently entertained students and guests in his home, and he produced beautiful poems and hymns, including one hymn that will live forever: “Ein Feste Burg Ist Unser Gott”(A Mighty Fortress Is Our God).

Education

Luther also did a great deal to promote education. He laboured tirelessly for establishment of schools everywhere. Luther wrote his Shorter Catechism in order to train up children in the essential doctrines of the faith.

Not the Simple and Obscure Monk of Popular Legend

It has been common to portray Luther as a simple and obscure monk, who challenged the pope and emperor. Actually Luther was anything but simple, or obscure. He was learned, experienced and accomplished far beyond most men of his age. He had lived in Magdeburg, Eisenach and was one of the most distinguished graduates of the University of Erfurt. Luther travelled to Cologne, to Leipzig, and had crossed the Alps, and travelled to Rome. Luther was a great student, with a tremendous breadth of reading, who had excelled in his studies, and achieved a Master of Arts and Doctorate in Theology in record time.

Extraordinary

He was an accomplished bestselling author, one of the greatest preachers of all time, a highly respected Theological professor, and one of the first professors to lecture in the German language, instead of in Latin. Far from being a simple monk, Luther was the Prior of his monastery and the district vicar over 11 other monasteries. Luther was a monk, a priest, a preacher, a professor, a writer, and a Reformer. He was one of most courageous and influential people in all of history. The Lutheran Faith was not only adopted in Northern Germany, but also throughout Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Finland and Iceland.

Controversial and Accomplished

Luther was a controversial figure in his day and has continued to be considered controversial to this very day. There is no doubt that Luther’s search for peace with God changed the whole course of human history. He challenged the power of Rome over the Christian Church, smashed the chains of superstition and tyranny and restored the Christian liberty to worship God in spirit and in truth.

“For I am not ashamed of the Gospel of Christ, for it is the power of God to salvation for everyone who believes …For in it the righteousness of God is revealed from faith to faith; as it is written, the just shall live by faith.” Romans 1:16 – 23

——–

Dr. Peter Hammond

Frontline Fellowship

P.O. Box 74 Newlands 7725

Cape Town South Africa

Tel: 021-689-4480

Email: mission@frontline.org.za

Website: www.frontline.org.za

This Article is adapted from: The Greatest Century of Reformation book (220 pages, 160 pictures, maps and charts), by Dr. Peter Hammond. To see the whole article: Martin Luther – Captive to the Word of God.

See also:

A Bold New Initiative for Reformation Today

Reformation FIRE for Africa

95 Theses for Reformation Today

Tell the Truth and Shame the Devil – The sensational book by Gerard Menuhin, son of the famous violinist Yehudi Menuhin.

Screen Shot 2016-04-14 at 6.50.15 AM

Tell the Truth and Shame the Devil

The sensational book by Gerard Menuhin, son of the famous violinist Yehudi Menuhin.

Gerard could no longer bear the lies being perpetrated against Germany and risked all to unmask what he called the “biggest lie in history” and the mightiest fraudulent criminal enterprise in mankind’s history—the Holocaust industry.

In this, his first book in English, Gerard Menuhin breaks through every taboo barrier.

He writes: “The Holocaust is the biggest lie in history. Germany has no blame for the Second World War.” He also makes a case for Adolf Hitler being the only statesman in the modern era who could have liberated the enslaved people of planet Earth from the clutches of organized world Zionism.

He writes:

“I suppose it began with a sense, nothing more. Not even a vague sentiment, let alone the certitude that what the average child is taught about major historical events is a pack of lies. It was just a lurking mental itch. My father never spoke of the war, any more than he spoke of anything negative or disagreeable or, indeed, about the past at all, if he could help it.

I never gave the subject much thought, occupied as I was with my daily drudgery, until the Nineties, when, while I was ordering the contents of my deceased grandparents’ house, I chanced on a copy of the National Zeitung, the patriotic German newspaper to which my grandfather had contributed a column for several years during the Sixties.

Due to the exceptional nature of the twelve years of National Socialism, a large and growing body of lurid fiction and alleged fact has materialized, based on its dramatic superficialities rather than on any study or comprehension of its socialist policies, and inspired by a particular agenda.

Sobriety rejects sensationalism. A perusal of reputable historical sources, some of them quite hard to find, helped me to form my own opinion. The most powerful persuasion, however, did not come from the rather dry accounts in my reading, but from the perfectly straightforward deduction that a people with the traditions and culture of the Germans did not almost overnight become barbarians and commit mass murder.”

Gerard was punished for breaking ranks and declaring himself on the side of truth.

In 2005, he was fired from his position as chairman of the Yehudi Menuhin Foundation after giving an interview in the Deutsche Stimme newspaper in which he said:

“An international lobby of influential people and organizations is trying to keep the Germans under pressure. Some nations — mainly America, but other Europeans, too — are profiting from an obedient Germany.”

He also called on Germans to stop paying taxes and thus protest at the outflow of German funds to the European Union. “People cannot be eternally exploited in this way,” he said, “as long as there is a budget deficit, no German public money should flow abroad.”

In his regular column with the Nationale Zeitung newspaper, Gerard condemned Jewish “souvenir hunters” who gather evidence in Germany to help them to lodge financial claims for wartime persecution.

 TELL THE TRUTH AND SHAME THE DEVIL

Layout 1

By Gerard Menuhin.  

Have you ever asked yourself why the world won’t come to rest? Why your parents, grandparents or great-grandparents had to die in wars that never should have occurred in the first place?

A book of monumental importance for the people of the world today. Many know that something is not right in the world. Nations engage in perpetual war while bankers and armaments makers line their pockets from the carnage. The average citizen of the world has been cut out of the decision-making process of government, whether he lives in a democracy, republic, theocracy or dictatorship.

All the while, the ruling elite grow stronger and richer as the real producers struggle to survive. Behind the scenes, events are controlled by a coterie of ethnic puppetmasters who work their marionettes in high places out of public view. How did this world get to the dark place it is today?? Who could have stopped it and what can we do today?

The book consists of three sections. The first section concerns Adolf Hitler, his character and intentions, and the real causes leading up to the outbreak of WWII, including the actions of the real culprits and the rejection of the great lie.

The second section enlarges on the activities of the real culprits, provides a historical overview of their progress, their nature, their power over finance and the media, and the methods by which they achieved it. It includes insights into Freemasonry, the European revolutions, the influence and control of education and foreign policy, the creation of the EU, the New World Order and the evolution of the plan through the same powers and their proxies, since the 17th century up to the present.

The third section concerns the First and Second World Wars (what the author refers to as “the Second Thirty Years War”), their conception, funding and inescapable continuity; current laws against freedom of expression, and the evolution of the Orwellian state; the importance of U.S. support for the Soviet Union throughout the Cold War, and Communism’s significance in the plan; the true origins of the enemy; Palestine’s occupation and its fate as an example of our common fate; plus much more.

The text is interspersed with “Memos from Today,” that emphasize its relevance by citing current events. Hundreds of quotes are included from a wide range of authoritative sources, original and translated. The last pages of this manuscript comprise conclusions and predictions.

The narrative is dense and packed with facts, and backed by expert testimony. At times, the style is personal, even casual, and absolutely non-intellectual. It has been assumed that a personal touch makes the contents more accessible.

The author is the son of the great American-born violinist Yehudi Menuhin, who, though from a long line of rabbinical ancestors, fiercely criticized the foreign policy of the state of Israel and its repression of the Palestinians in the Holy Land.

Read it. Think about it. Distribute it to others. This is a book that can make a difference!

Source: http://www.philosophers-stone.co.uk/

Irwin Cotler’s genocide rankings: Letter to National Zionist Jew Post from Ian V Macdonald

Let2NatPostIanVM copy 3

HP – like most con-artists, the Professor is a smooth talker. He talks the talk but, as with the Jewish neo-cons in Washington, makes sure that if there is any personal risk, it’s Whitey who has to walk the walk. We should have sent him to Rwanda to settle the genocide instead of Gen. Dallaire. Being singularly unappetizing, he would have been relatively safe from the cannibals! IV

From: ianvmacdonald@aol.com
To: letters@nationalpost.com
Sent: 2016-04-10 
Subject: Irwin Cotler’s genocide rankings

April 9, 2016

Editor
NATIONAL POST
Toronto

Dear Sir,

Re:Rwandan genocide

Professor Irwin Cotler (“Never again”, again and again ” NP Apr. 9, 2016) deplores genocides, and condemns in even stronger terms the failure of the rest of the world to intervene. With breathless sophistry and Jewish hypocrisy he reminds us of the fact that seven years ago he had as Justice Minister introduced a Bill in Parliament inviting “reflection” on the horrors of genocide, giving special reference to the “unprecedented horrors of the Holocaust of the Jews” in Europe by Germany, now exposed unequivocally as a gigantic hoax. Even if the wildest version of the Holocaust legend were true, Jewish losses would have been minuscule compared with Stalin’s Jewish-implemented slaughter of 80 million Christians plus tens of millions more casualties of war.

Professor Cotler claims also that preventing incitement (“hate speech”) is the answer to forestalling race and religion-based genocide but ignores the Jewish torrent of hate toward their Palestinian victims, which accompanied the mass killing and cruel dispossession of the “cockroaches” and “two-legged animals” and the infamous statement by Golda Meir that Palestinians don’t exist. Palestinians’ lives were worthless in Israeli eyes, especially those of children, thousands of whom were killed or disabled by IDF “soldiers,” almost as a form of sport during the Intifada. There are many cases of innocent Palestinians killed by Israelis in cold blood, with impunity.

Unlike Rwanda, buried in Darkest Africa where violent death is a way of life, Israel is a “civilized” country in full view and easily constrained from uncivilized practices by its vulnerability to trade and financial sanctions. Mr Cotler fails to mention the glaring criminality of the UN-condemned Jewish state, nor does he explain his omission of this prime offender from his criticism of genocide, His hypocrisy is paramount however in his failure to recognize the Jewish-contrived Second World War as a form of genocide of Whites, now proceeding in its aftermath, as planned, with seemingly irreversible momentum, especially in Germany, the epitome of modern Western culture and industry that dared to challenge Jewish hegemony and parasitism.

Although Prof. Cotler’s article consists of useless oversimplifications and platitudes in his attempt to distract readers from reality, it does offer a priceless turn of phrase on the Rwandan Genocide worth pondering: “which occurred not only because of the vulnerability of the powerless, but also because of the powerlessness of the vulnerable”.

As ever,

Ian V. Macdonald
Ottawa ON

NEW WORLD ORDER: Communism Through the Back Door – video by Dennis Wise

Screen Shot 2016-04-10 at 9.53.07 PM

Four hours, 16 segments.  Amazing, fast-moving explanation for the plight of our world.

Same producer of THE GREATEST STORY NEVER TOLD.

16 Year Old German Girl Bibi Wilhailm Pleads to World – STOP DESTROYING GERMANY!!!

GERMANGIRL

NDP Thomas Mulcair’s chutzpah typical of pro-Zionist Israeli sycophants Letter to Editor by Ian V. Macdonald

Let2NatPostIanVM copy 3

HP -The hatchet man for the firing of the decent Christian Morgan Wheeldon was one Brad Lavigne (Levine?) who came out of nowhere to do the dirty work and quickly crawled back into his hole to continue as an “advisor”. I bet there are plenty of dubious skeletons in the supposedly clean NDP’s closet, including the comment by Stephen Lewis that if there should be a war between Canada and Israel, his son would be on the Israeli side. IV

From: ianvmacdonald@aol.com
To: letters@nationalp0st.com
Sent: 2016-04-07 6:25:11 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time
Subj: Mulcair’s chutzpah

April 7, 2016
Editor
NATIONAL POST
Toronto

Dear Sir

Mulcair conflict of interest

At the time of the NDP leadership convention, July, 2012, a Canadian Jewish watchdog association opposed the election of Thomas Mulcair as leader on the grounds that he was financed by the Israeli Lobby and that his primary loyalty was to the State of Israel. He thereby faced a conflict of interest unacceptable for a Party that claimed to be 100% pro-Canadian and, unlike the older parties, relied on donations from the “little people”, as distinct from corrupting, self-serving “capitalist” donors. Mulcair’s undivided loyalty to Israel was not a public, nor even a party, issue at the time, but burst out during the Federal election campaign with Mulcair’s sordid firing of Morgan Wheeldon, one of his party’s most enthusiastic and effective candidates, for once allegedly having criticized the Israeli Occupation. The fact that the firing was a knee-jerk reaction, with no hearing for the popular candidate, must have shaken even the most dedicated Party members to the core, and stopped idealistic potential new supporters in their disillusioned tracks!.

Such perfidious action, showing more concern over Israeli sensitivities than over the reputation of his own party, would have been sufficient to reverse the growing electoral momentum, but there were other serious mistakes, perhaps contrived, that reflected acquiescence to Lobby pressure, the most decisive being the failure of the NDP to exploit Prime Minister Harper’s “love affair with Israel” and grovelling to rabbis that left the PM open to ridicule and charges of outrageously poor judgement in the damage the “alliance” did to Canada’s self-respect and image as a sovereign nation. Add to these negatives the confusion of the meaningless “Change” platform and Mulcair’s decision not to have the good grace to apologize and resign, and the recent headline “Mulcair looking for 70%” at the Leadership Convention (see NP April 6. 2016) must be seen as well beyond chutzpah.

WAKEUPCANADA

I wrote to most senior NDP officials, beginning 2014, saying that retaining Mulcair as leader was a prime case of snatching defeat from the jaws of victory. I received a reply from only one, the righteous Paul Dewar, who ironically was defeated. He attempted to explain his Party’s support of the rape and dispossession of Libya by NATO and murder of its enlightened pro-Canadian, anti-Israel Leader, who had done more for his people than any leader in history – yet another campaign opportunity left unexploited. With this record of treachery to both Party and nation, Mulcair should be lucky to get 7%, not 70, at the forthcoming Leadership Convention.

As ever,

Ian V. Macdonald
Ottawa ON

Canada Thinks It Has a Better Way to Defend Religious Freedom By Morgan Lee/Christianity Today

Canada Thinks It Has a Better Way to Defend Religious Freedom
New government shuts down Office of Religious Freedom modelled after US version.
Morgan Lee
APRIL 6, 2016

Screen Shot 2016-04-07 at 6.16.48 PM SDionFreedomofReligion

ATEDITOR0216

[Editor’s Note: Liberal foreign affairs minister Stéphane Dion tells us that in order for Canadians to enjoy freedom of religion they must also have freedom of conscience and, to my way of thinking, the most important freedom of all – freedom of speech.

So what is the new Liberal government of Justin Trudeau doing about ensuring and protecting this basic Charter right? The first thing that needs to be done is to repeal the infamous and Orwellian section of Canada’s Criminal Code Sec. 318 to 320. Without the removal of these unconstitutional “Hate Propaganda” laws, instigated by the Zionist lobby here in Canada, we will never see full freedom of religion (with, of course, the exception of Talmudic Judaism).

So come on Mr. Dion and Mr. Trudeau let’s get behind the Charter challenge to Sec. 319(2) as it’s now unfolding in Regina v Roy Arthur Topham and see to it that all religions are placed on an even keel.

Support Freedom of Speech in Canada and also support Arthur Topham’s upcoming Charter challenge.]

——

The first attempt to replicate the United States’s diplomatic advocacy for beleaguered believers worldwide has come to an end.

Five years ago, Canada’s Conservative party campaigned for a new office to champion the cause of international religious freedom (IRF). The office opened in 2013, looking to complement the strengths of the US State Department’s IRF office that it was modelled after.

But six months after the Conservatives lost national elections to the Liberal party, the four-person, $5 million Office of Religious Freedom (ORF) has been shut down.

“Our government shares the same conviction as the previous government, but it assesses the consequences of its chosen method of promoting this conviction differently,” said foreign affairs minister Stéphane Dion during a speech, according to The Globe and Mail. “I am referring to freedom of religion or belief, which we will defend tooth and nail, but not through the office that the Harper government specifically set up for this purpose.”

Members of prime minister Justin Trudeau’s new government are opting instead to fold religious rights into a broader human rights office.

“We believe that human rights are better defended when they are considered, universal, indivisible, interdependent and interrelated, as set out in the Vienna Declaration,” said Dion during the speech. He foreshadowed the decision in a January speech, noting, “How can you enjoy freedom of religion if you don’t have freedom of conscience? Freedom of speech? Freedom of mobility?”

The chairman of the ORF’s religious advisors doubts this explanation. “If the ORF is not being closed because it is not working, it is likely being closed because the government does not place a priority on the work itself,” wrote Raymond J. De Souza for the National Post. “That reading is rendered more plausible given that the foreign affairs department (now called Global Affairs) undertook no consultations with the ORF’s advisory committee…. If there was a commitment to religious freedom, but through a different means, such consultation would have been an obvious starting point.”

Screen Shot 2016-04-07 at 6.28.56 PM

The Economist speculates that Liberals object more to the Conservative party that founded the ORF than the office itself.

Former prime minister Stephen Harper first suggested its creation following the assassination of Pakistani politician Shahbaz Bhatti, an outspoken proponent for his country’s minorities.

“We’re deeply disappointed,” Bruce Clemenger, president of the Evangelical Fellowship of Canada, told CT. “The office had became a go-to place for us to raise concerns about religious freedom to the government, and it established a level of expertise within the Canadian government.”

An Ottawa academic and Ukrainian Catholic, Andrew Bennett, was nominated as the office’s first and only ambassador in 2013. Bennett left his position in March to join the Christian think tank Cardus and lead its new interfaith initiative, Faith in Canada 150.

The need for the office has been contested since it opened in 2013. Some worried it would be prone to favor Christianity, since the majority of consultants in an early closed-door meeting were Christians. Critics also suggested that it was a “misguided attempt to inject religion into foreign policy, and some have expressed concern that it would be biased toward the persecution of Christians,” Religion News Service reported in 2013.

But the office’s closure was protested by a variety of faith groups, including representatives from the Jewish, Sikh, and Muslim communities, who called its work valuable. “While these projects do not always make headlines, we believe they laudably reflect a practical and effective role Canada can play in mitigating the plight of persecuted religious minorities around the world,” they wrote.

Canadians in general are only moderately enthusiastic about religious freedom: 62 percent said that it was very important that people can practice their religion freely in their country, compared to 84 percent in the United States. Canadians ranked religious freedom below equal rights for women (92%) and two-party, honest elections (81%), according to a Pew Research Center study of 38 countries last year.

Canada’s concern for religious freedom ranked in the bottom third of the countries Pew surveyed. Religion was the most valued democratic principle, Pew found, garnering the support of 74 percent of people globally.

Image processed by CodeCarvings Piczard ### FREE Community Edition ### on 2016-04-04 21:26:50Z | http://piczard.com | http://codecarvings.com¦ Ib8$I

Image processed by CodeCarvings Piczard ### FREE Community Edition ### on 2016-04-04 21:26:50Z | http://piczard.com | http://codecarvings.com¦
Ib8$I

Globally, African countries were most likely to value religious freedom, with 90 percent of Nigerians and Senegalese calling it the most important freedom. (Five of the top seven countries were in sub-Saharan Africa, and the regional median was 87 percent.)

Almost three out of four citizens of Asian countries also valued religious freedom, though the range from the regional median (74%) was larger. The vast majority of Indians and Indonesians (both 83%) highly prioritize religious freedom, while less than half of South Koreans (49%), Vietnamese (46%), and Japanese (24%) said the same.

Brazil had the highest support (86%) for religious freedom out of any Latin American country, followed by Argentina (76%) and Chile (75%). Support was the lowest in Mexico (64%) and Venezuela (66%). The regional median was 72 percent.

Europe had the lowest regional median (63%). Italians (75%) and Germans (71%) were most likely to support religious freedom, while French (52%) and Polish (55%) citizens were least likely.

Support for religious freedom did not strongly correlate with participation in a particular faith, Pew found.

“Freedom of religion is widely embraced around the world, but it is particularly significant to people who place high importance on religion in their lives,” stated Pew. “In 34 nations, those who say religion is very important in their own lives are more likely to believe it is very important to live in a country where people can practice their religion freely.”

CT noted when Bennett was named the religious freedom ambassador (two years late), as well as several cases where Canada’s Immigration and Refugee Board denied asylum because applicants demonstrated poor knowledge of Christian doctrine.

SOURCE

[Photo courtesy of ORF – Facebook]

TRUMP TOWN: The Trump family fortune has its roots in a northern B.C. gold mining town By Glen Schaefer & John Coleburn, Vancouver Sun April 5, 2016

Trump Town

The Arctic Hotel was open 24 hours a day and boasted “private boxes” for ladies, which included a bed and a gold scale so customers could pay in nuggets.
Photograph by: Image I-50656 courtesy of the Royal BC Museum and Archives Ca. 1899

TRUMP TOWN: The Trump family fortune has its roots in a northern B.C. gold mining town
By Glen Schaefer & John Coleburn, Vancouver Sun

April 5, 2016

 

A First Nations band is planning to start luring tourists this summer to the northern B.C. ghost town where Donald Trump’s pioneering grandfather once ran a brothel.

The Carcross Tagish First Nation, whose territory straddles the B.C.-Yukon border, is building a luxury wilderness camp south of that border, in the town of Bennett, which was briefly a hub for prospectors and others seeking their gold-rush fortunes, including one Frederich Trump, who established the Arctic Hotel there in 1899.

The Arctic Hotel was open 24 hours a day and boasted “private boxes” for ladies, which included a bed and a gold scale so customers could pay in nuggets, according to a multigenerational biography of the Trumps by U.S. author and journalist Gwenda Blair.

“The bulk of the (hotel’s) cash flow came from the sale of liquor and sex,” Blair wrote in her book The Trumps: Three Generations That Built An Empire.

The elder Trump, who left his native Germany for North America as a teen, later moved his operation from Bennett to Whitehorse. He left the North altogether within three years, having amassed the seed money he would later use to plant the Trump fortune in the U.S.

Frederich Trump’s old two-storey Arctic Hotel no longer stands in Bennett, and the town has cleaned up since Trump and the prospectors left. But guides will tell guests the stories of those days and other bits of local history, said Jeff Barrett, chief executive officer of the Carcross Tagish Development Corporation.

Trump’s old hotel “is gone, nothing there,” Barrett said Monday. “There’s only one building that you’d notice if you were just walking through, just the church.”

The First Nation is building the “wilderness lodge experience” in partnership with Parks Canada, he said. “A cookhouse and some higher-end luxury tents.”

The cookhouse will feature a replica of the Arctic Hotel’s false front, though they’re still debating whether to use the old name.

The area’s grounds have been examined and mapped by archaeologists, he added, so they know exactly where the hotel once stood.

The wilderness camp has been in the works for about two years, and it’s certainly not meant to be a Trump-brothel theme park. But Barrett said they don’t mind the attention they’ve drawn for their ancestral connection to the front-runner for the Republican presidential nomination.

“The former CEO here was using that (connection) to try and garner some attention,” Barrett said. “I think he actually sent out a letter to Trump about it, asking if he was interested. We never got anything back from him.

“But Parks Canada is a bit nervous about associating, I think, with Trump.”

“I think it would be kind of fun to play with it,” he said of the Arctic Hotel name being considered for the cookhouse.

“It’s a neat history, showing how, where they all started. You can’t make that up — very rich stories in the gold rush years, for sure.”

The camp’s four tents are replicas of the canvas tents used by prospectors and miners in the gold rush days, and furnished with eclectic antique beds and carpets. Operator Nature Tours of Yukon is offering three-night, four-day visits for $1,685 per person.

Bennett wasn’t easy to reach back in the gold rush days — pack animals and people died frequently on the pass from Skagway, Alaska — and it’s still hard to get there.

The narrow-gauge White Pass Railway runs in the warm months from Skagway to Carcross and on to Whitehorse, he said. “Seaplanes go in as well. People can also hike the Chilkoot Trail and come in three, four nights from the Skagway side.”

Carcross Tagish guides and cooks will be hosting guests and telling stories, amid a spectacularly rugged mountains setting.

“There’s quite a bit of hiking, there’s some great fishing, there’s good canoeing and kayaking,” Barrett said. “(The lake) kind of feels like a fjord, with mountains rising on either side.”

In other Trump-related B.C. news, a Mexican-Canadian construction worker this weekend hung a Mexican flag atop Vancouver’s under-construction Trump Tower, a hotel and condominium project being built by the Holborn Group. The flag, which was taken down Sunday, drew international attention, with photographs shared widely through social media.

Calls to the Holborn Group regarding Trump Tower were not returned. An email to the media department at Donald Trump’s campaign was also not returned.

—–
twitter.com/glenschaefer
© Copyright (c) The Vancouver Sun

SOURCE ARTICLE

Bogus candidates for deluded people by John Kaminsky

KaminskiTrainWreckHdr

Bogus candidates for deluded people

The truly important issues are never even addressed!

IF WE DON’T DO IT NOW, WE WILL NEVER BE ALLOWED TO TALK ABOUT JEWISH CRIMES

By John Kaminski
pseudoskylax@gmail.com
http://therebel.is/kaminski

Most of you know, but you pretend you don’t. The government is not on your side. It never has been. And the way things are set up, it never will be.

Especially when nearly everyone is too cowardly to talk about the most important issue, that is, to name the Jew as the cause of this slow motion train wreck now destroying the United States of America.

The government’s animosity toward the population has degenerated to the point where it can set up an ambush on a snowy Oregon highway with the intent to murder an unarmed patriot who was only trying to defend Constitutional principles and protest the theft of a farmer’s land by a corrupt government agency, and then have the killing ruled justifiable by a reckless judge wired into the criminal cabal in Washington trying to conceal a Presidential candidate’s diabolical maneuver to illegally sell U.S. uranium deposits to the Russians.

Of course, this kind of perfidy is nothing new. It has always been the basic modus operandi of American history.

Ordinary people have been judged guilty before they could be charged since before the first Kennedy assassination; some say the people were declared permanently guilty in the federal bankruptcy of 1933 when the government used them as collateral to sell America to the International Monetary Fund.

Others insist it happened long before that, when Lincoln cashed in the Constitution in order to enforce the ripoff of the Confederacy; and still others insist the people have never been in control of their U.S. government, not even on that day Patrick Henry refused to go to Philadelphia because he felt the Constitution was a fraud.

In any case, we surely are not in control of our government today — of this there is no doubt. All that money we send to slick talking candidates who promise to defend our interests is now and always has been for nothing. Only the rich who can bribe with millions control the politicians, making all the irrelevant rhetoric of our deeply flawed presidential candidates all the more preposterous as it assails our ears from the pursed lips of our prostituted media pundits.

The so-called hero of the current presidential campaign has galvanized people desperate for a relevant hero into believing construction of a giant wall on the Mexican border somehow is the answer to all things that besiege us in this watershed election year of 2016.

However, it has been my observation in every presidential election year that all the major candidates are prescreened by the bankers and guaranteed not to reveal the major secrets that enslave society. This is compounded by an equally obvious fact that the major obstacle to peace and tranquility are the candidates themselves who are chosen by and beholden to the bankers, and their corrupt efforts come at the expense of the American people.

Let me be clear about this — the major threat to the American people are the candidates themselves and the corrupt government they presume to represent. Which of course makes our corrupt elections certain exercises in futility. This has gone on so long the American people have come to believe this situation — pre-elected Jewish favored candidates compounded by computerized fixed elections — is normal and healthy.

Worst of all in all the presidential elections is that the real issues are never — and I mean absolutely never — discussed.

Billionaire casino mogul Donald Trump has captivated the masses by seizing on the unease expressed by longtime Americans who see runaway immigration gobbling up jobs, destabilizing communities and overstressing law enforcement and medical systems.

Perhaps most shocking is that all his opponents and all of the major mainstream media accuse Trump of betraying their corrupt American system — the one that exports wars around the world and funnels its jobs to Third World countries to maximize the profits of the rich and pauperize the lives of its honest taxpayers — to the point where assassination is recommended for the one candidate who seems somewhat interested in the welfare of ordinary people.

Simply on the basis the opposition emanating by proven criminals Trump seems an easy choice for any conscientious voter with a passing knowledge of America’s criminal history in the 20th century.

But despite his pinpointing of the epidemic immigration of destitute Third World criminals as an issue critical to America’s survival, even Trump won’t go near the truly profound issues facing the American people, which are:

1. A proper investigation and prosecution of the perpetrators of the 9/11 debacle, which were not Arab hijackers but Jewish American billionaires, who control the White House, the Congress, the banking establishment and all the other major professions in the country.

This probe would also result in the dismantling of the Department of Homeland Security, which under the aegis of criminal Attorneys General and corrupt judges, has allowed widespread criminality by the government itself under Presidents Clinton, Bush and Obama, and jailed millions of innocent people who have committed no substantive crimes.

2. This false flag deceit has led to the expense of trillions of dollars fighting irrelevant wars against innocent countries for the purpose of stealing their resources and killing those who oppose Jewish worldwide financial hegemony, resulting in the pauperization of the American people and funneling of trillions to Israel and their outlaw minions throughout the world.

It was bad enough when the government invented Al-Qaeda as an all-purpose enemy that could be blamed for 9/11 yet used an ally against Serbia and Libya, but the funding of ISIS by the U.S. and then sending U.S. troops to fight them represents an all-time low in the integrity of the American government as well as an all-time low in the gullibility of the American people.

When a government funds its own enemies, no one is safe.

3. One area presidential candidates have absolutely refused to discuss has been the approval of poisoned food manufactured by producers of poison chemicals and the failure to identify poison medicines which have already ravaged younger generations with autism and other maladies, giving rise to certain identification of an evil policy of white genocide and population reduction in order to further consolidate vicious, conscienceless Jewish control of the world.

Certainly no candidate has dared discuss this epidemic of murders of conscientious doctors who have discovered the presence of cancer-causing agents in government approved vaccines, or the vaccines given to girls that prevent their ability to have normal children when they grow up. http://www.healthnutnews.com/abc-holistic-doctor-wife-child-killed-in-horrific-triple-murder/

4. The government has put a total clampdown on information pertaining to the pollution of the atmosphere. While officials prattle on about carbon taxes, no candidate dares to address the longterm effect of the Fukushima disaster or the overstressed situation of U.S. nuclear plants, 75 percent of which have been found to be leaking http://www.cbsnews.com/news/radioactive-leaks-found-at-75-of-us-nuke-sites/.

Leaking nuke plants contribute to rising cancer rates, which is great for the cancer industry and Big Pharma criminals <http://yournewswire.com/cancer-rates-explode-near-new-york-nuclear-plant-leak/>.

5. Jewish control of the world is already markedly identifiable by the cynical changes in college curricula that emphasize the practice of social perversions over the mastery of classical sciences. Taken down to the earlier levels of education, the institution of dumbed down courses, easier grading, and massive levels of student loan debt guarantees a future populations of unequipped, financially strapped morons unable to fend for themselves except by depending on their government welfare checks under the condition of not objecting to totalitarian, regressive and destructive government programs.

6. While candidates continue to rage on about the moral failings of their opponents, none are seriously discussing the condition of America’s money supply, which is the No. 1 issue on the minds of the American people.

Only Ellen Brown, that we know of, and her plan to finance a series of public state banks, seems willing to advance a sensible proposal, but since the corrupt powers that be are dependent on the widespread graft that keeps them in business, no presidential candidate is likely to ever discuss this issue, as long as the wholly Jewish owned, foreign controlled, Federal Reserve system remains in control of America’s money supply, charging us daily for the use of our own money and forcing America deeper and deeper down the sewer of Jewish perfidy. http://www.publicbankinginstitute.org

In the meantime, media reports remind us that when it comes time to attempt to balance the books on America’s Jewish-fouled finances, debts relating to derivatives must by law be paid off first, leaving nothing for the people and businesses who are about to have their bank accounts stolen by the Jews who control America and the world.

Current candidates for president don’t talk about any of these realistically pressing issues, and the retarded mainstream media nor most retarded mainstream Americans don’t press them on it.

You can’t expect pathological criminals to give themselves up, can you?

So it really doesn’t matter who you vote for. All these candidates are devoted to supporting the criminal Jewish status quo, to continue the wars for Israel and the pillaging of the emaciated carcass of the moribund American republic.

Until this practice is stopped cold — and widely discussed by America’s erstwhile politicians — neither you nor America has a legitimate future in which freedom and liberty may be practiced, and the world’s problems may be freely and legitimately discussed.

On this basis every elected government official now serving should be assailed and attacked unmercifully for their complicity in treason and the willful destruction of both the United States of America and the world as we know it.

No exceptions. The time for petitions and/or civil discourse is long past. The fate of the world hangs in the balance, the criminal perpetrators of all these crimes against humanity are well known, and any delay in exacting justice against these pathological villains can only be judged an unforgivable sin.

—-

John Kaminski is a writer who lives on the Gulf Coast of Florida, constantly trying to figure out why we are destroying ourselves, and pinpointing a corrupt belief system as the engine of our demise. Solely dependent on contributions from readers, please support his work by mail: 6871 Willow Creek Circle #103, North Port FL 34287 USA.
http://therebel.is/kaminski
http://johnkaminski.info/
http://www.rudemacedon.ca/kaminski/kam-index.html
http://www.serendipity.li/john_kaminski_articles.htm
http://web.archive.org/web/20040323232319/http://johnkaminski.com/

U.S. leaders capitulate to Zionist Jew lobby group AIPAC – PRESS TV UK interview with Gilad Atzmon & Hafsa Kara Mustapha

GiladPressTVAIPAC

Press TV: Telling The Truth About AIPAC, Jewish Political Lobbying And The Fate Of The West

with Roshan Muhammed Salih (Moderator), Hafsa Kara Mustapha and Gilad Atzmon

https://youtu.be/23TJwROwifY

Roshan Muhammed Salih (Moderator), Hafsa Kara Mustapha and Gilad Atzmon

Trudeau gov’t unable to follow through on anti-BDS motion? from Patricia Jean Canadians for Justice and Peace in the Middle East (CJPME)

Screen Shot 2016-03-20 at 10.55.47 PM

Trudeau gov’t unable to follow through on anti-BDS motion?

Montreal, March 30, 2016  — It has been over five weeks since the majority Liberal government of Justin Trudeau committed itself to condemning all Canadian groups and individuals who promote the boycott of Israel (i.e. BDS)[i] in Canada.  Canadians for Justice and Peace in the Middle East (CJPME) points out that, despite the lip service that Liberal leaders gave in support of the motion at the time, government leaders have not yet condemned a single Canadian group or individual for BDS.

CJPME leaders conclude that this is either because: 1) the Liberal government is not convinced of the merits of the motion, or 2) the Liberal government is concerned that the motion contradicts Canada’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

CJPME also questions whether the Conservative sponsors of the motion actually give credence to the motion, as they have likewise failed to hold the government accountable in the fulfillment of the intents of the motion.

This week, CJPME sent letters to MPs Justin Trudeau,[ii] Stéphane Dion,[iii] Tony Clement,[iv] Michelle Rempel[v] and Thomas Mulcair,[vi]  providing the following documentation of its promotion of the BDS movement in Canada:

Photos of CJPME’s president, Thomas Woodley, applying “Do not buy this product: Made in Israel” [vii] stickers on merchandise in Canadian stores.

•Details on CJPME’s other enthusiastic and long-standing promotion of BDS, including information and links to its “Boycott Centre” and its BDS Sticky Notes campaign.

A petition, signed by over 3000 Canadians challenging the Trudeau government to condemn each of them “individually” (as specified in the motion) for their promotion of the BDS movement in Canada.

As early as Feb. 23rd – one day after the passage of the motion – Woodley challenged the Trudeau government to condemn him and his organization.  “I’ve realized that being condemned by Canada’s government, merely for supporting the human rights of Palestinians, might be the most admirable thing I’ll accomplish in my life,” wrote Woodley in a letter to the government.  Nevertheless, in the five weeks since, the government has responded neither with an answer nor a condemnation.  CJPME is one of the lead Canadian groups actively promoting BDS, and does so to encourage Israel to respect the human rights of Palestinians. [viii]

Given the government’s unwillingness to follow through on the motion, CJPME has concluded that the motion was just a bit of political theatre, intended to score some political points at the expense of Canadians’ Charter rights.  In his letter to Trudeau and Dion, Woodley concluded, “If you’re not going to carry out the condemnations, then show some spine and renounce the anti-BDS motion.  If you do neither, then you prove that the goal of the motion was simply to score a few political points, at the expense of our right to free speech.”

###

For more information, please contact:

Patricia Jean

Canadians for Justice and Peace in the Middle East

Telephone: 438-380-5410

Email CJPMECJPME Website

GO AHEAD, MAKE MY DAY, CONDEMN ME Letter from Thomas Woodley, President of Canadians for Justice and Peace in the Middle East

BDSHDR

GO AHEAD, MAKE MY DAY, CONDEMN ME

The government has committed to condemning all of us, for “any and all attempts” to promote BDS. Let’s challenge the government to do it, to each of us! Here’s our petition:

To the head of Canada’s government, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau:

WHEREAS the House of Commons passed a motion calling the government “to condemn any and all attempts by Canadian organizations, groups or individuals to promote the BDS [Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions] movement, both here at home and abroad,”

WHEREAS each one of us has sought to promote the BDS movement,

THEREFORE, we the undersigned petition the Canadian government to be individually condemned for, as appropriate, our thoughts, words, and actions, promoting BDS:

T.WOODLEYPIC

Letter from Thomas Woodley, President of Canadians for Justice and Peace in the Middle East

Re: Awaiting your condemnation for my promotion of BDS

The Right Honourable Justin Trudeau

House of Commons

Ottawa, ON  K1A 0A6

Dear Mr. Trudeau

Given that the House of Commons yesterday passed a motion calling the government “to condemn any and all attempts by Canadian organizations, groups or individuals to promote the BDS movement, both here at home and abroad,” I anxiously await your condemnation.

Although I regret that I have not had the opportunity to promote the BDS movement abroad, I have done my utmost to promote it in Canada.  I note that you are required to condemn “any and all” attempts to promote BDS, so I will list as many of my attempts as I can think of below.

Before I jump into my list of transgressions, however, I thought you might want to know a bit about the BDS movement.  Surprisingly, I don’t believe its official, stated objectives were ever actually mentioned during the parliamentary debate on the motion.  I simple oversight, I suspect.

The first stated objective of the BDS movement is “Ending [Israel’s] occupation and colonization of all Arab lands and dismantling the Wall.” [1]  It’s almost as if the founders of the BDS movement were reading from Canada’s Global Affairs Website on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict where it says, for example:

  • “Canada does not recognize permanent Israeli control over territories occupied in 1967 (the Golan Heights, the West Bank, East Jerusalem and the Gaza Strip). The Fourth Geneva Convention applies in the occupied territories and establishes Israel’s obligations as an occupying power, in particular with respect to the humane treatment of the inhabitants of the occupied territories.” [2]
  • “Canada does not recognize Israel’s unilateral annexation of East Jerusalem.” [3]
  • “Canada opposes Israel’s construction of the barrier inside the West Bank and East Jerusalem which are occupied territories. This construction is contrary to international law under the Fourth Geneva Convention. Canada not only opposes Israel’s construction of a barrier extending into the occupied territories, but also expropriations and the demolition of houses and economic infrastructure carried out for this purpose.” [4]

The second stated objective of the BDS movement is “Recognizing the fundamental rights of the Arab-Palestinian citizens of Israel to full equality.” [5]  This is eerily similar to Canada’s Global Affairs commitment to human rights around the world:

  • “Canada takes principled positions on important issues to ensure that freedom, democracy, human rights and the rule of law, values that define this country, are enjoyed around the world.” [6]

The third stated objective of the BDS movement is “Respecting, protecting and promoting the rights of Palestinian refugees to return to their homes and properties as stipulated in UN resolution 194.” [7]  I just double-checked and confirmed that in 1948, Canada indeed voted in favour of Resolution 194.   Canada’s consistency on this issue is reflected on Canada’s Global Affairs Website:

  • “Canada believes that a just solution to the Palestinian refugee issue is central to a settlement of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, as called for in United Nations General Assembly resolution 194 (1948) and United Nations Security Council resolution 242. … This solution should respect the rights of the refugees, in accordance with international law.” [8]

Although I’m still anxious to be condemned, I’m not sure I understand why you find it necessary to condemn me, given that the BDS movement is perfectly aligned with Canada’s official policy.  I certainly hope that when Parliament debates other laws and motions, the debate is more strongly based in documented facts and positions. Imagine how embarrassing it would be if the House of Commons were debating an energy pipeline, and got the starting and ending locations wrong.

As for my activities promoting BDS, I list the most “egregious” examples here, most of them performed in my capacity as President of Canadians for Justice and Peace in the Middle East:

  • I instigated the launch of a “Boycott Centre” (http://cjpme.org/boycott_centre) on my organization’s Website in 2010.  Here we blatantly promote BDS, and provide all sorts of information and tools to Canadians.  For example, Canadians are invited to write letters to local store managers and corporate executives to reconsider their buying decisions in light of Israel’s human rights abuses as documented by Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch.
  • CJPME’s Boycott Centre has a page dedicated to the moral and legal justification (http://cjpme.org/legal_and_moral_justification) of the BDS movement – also surely a blatant “promotion” of the movement.
  • I have also overseen the creation of factsheets detailing why, under international law, it is unlawful for Israeli companies to take advantage of Israel’s military occupation of Palestinian territory for commercial benefit.  For example, Israeli company Ahava extracts Dead Sea minerals from the shores of the West Bank and sells them as expensive cosmetics.  Highlighting violations such as this surely “promotes” BDS.
  • My organization and I have also met with a few dozen members of Parliament one day last June to talk about the BDS movement.  If you want, I can provide you their names, as you may need to condemn them too.  I suspect that parliamentarians seeking to inform themselves about the BDS movement would also constitute “promotion.”  But I leave such questions in your capable hands.

While I could continue, I suspect that my “promotion” of the BDS movement as described above is sufficient for your condemnation.

As I reviewed the Parliamentary debate from last week, I saw some of the same questions that we get on our Facebook page.  Why, we are often asked, is your boycott targeting Israel alone?  There are many reasons, but let me identify a few of the core ones:

  • First, we boycott Israel because we have been explicitly asked to do so by the Palestinians.  In 2005, over 170 organizations from Palestinian civil society asked the international community to boycott Israel. [9]
  • Second, all other attempts over the past 50 years to get Israel to respect the human rights of Palestinians have failed: e.g. dozens of UN resolutions, international peace efforts, decisions by the International Court of Justice, etc.
  • Third, Israel’s violations of Palestinian human rights have been going on a long time.  The first Israeli colony (a.k.a. “settlement”) in the West Bank was built in 1967, soon after Israel invaded and militarily occupied this territory.  In the almost 50 years since, the numbers of Israeli colonists (“settlers”) have increased constantly and stand at over 600,000 now.
  • Finally, the human rights abuses committed against the Palestinians seem especially dreadful because they are ethnically-oriented.  That is, many of the abuses suffered by the Palestinians are the result of Israeli laws established to confer or rescind rights based primarily on one’s ethnicity.

From the above, hopefully it is clear that, whereas other countries have human rights situations that need addressing, the Israel-Palestinian conflict is unique in many ways.

In the debate in Parliament, Members supporting the motion seemed convinced that supporters of BDS were motivated by anti-Semitism and/or a desire to destroy the state of Israel.  I suspect many of them have never actually met a supporter of BDS.  Please let them know that I would be happy to introduce them to “real live” Canadian BDS supporters, if they so wished.  They might be surprised to learn that many of the most ardent supporters of the BDS movement in Canada are Jewish-Canadians.

I have to admit that I am surprised to be facing your condemnation.  With your “Real change now” election slogan last Fall, I had quietly hoped that things might work differently in government if you were elected.  As you can probably imagine, the Harper Conservatives were pretty tough on people like me: people who questioned their ideology on Israel, women’s’ rights, unrestricted trade, and the environment.  Nevertheless, with their majority, they never bothered to pass a motion which obliged them to call out and condemn “any and all attempts” by Canadian “organizations, groups and individuals.”  Hopefully, this motion is a reflection of your own attention to detail and your ambition to tackle big tasks.

As you can probably imagine, in the face of your opprobrium, I’m feeling pretty vulnerable now.  Nevertheless, I’ve realized that being condemned by Canada’s government, merely for supporting the human rights of Palestinians, might be the most admirable thing I’ll accomplish in my life.

So bring it on.  Condemn me.  I’m ready.

Sincerely,

Thomas Woodley

President, Canadians for Justice and Peace in the Middle East

Footnotes:

[1] “Palestinian Civil Society Call for BDS,” Palestinian BDS National Committee,  http://bdsmovement.net/call accessed Feb. 23, 2016

[2] “Canadian Policy on Key Issues in the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict,” Global Affairs Canada Website, Government of Canada,  http://www.international.gc.ca/name-anmo/peace_process-processus_paix/canadian_policy-politique_canadienne.aspx?lang=eng accessed Feb. 23, 2016

[3] Ibid., “Canadian Policy on Key Issues in the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict”

[4] Ibid., “Canadian Policy on Key Issues in the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict”

[5] Ibid., “Palestinian Civil Society Call for BDS”

[6] “Human Rights,” Global Affairs Canada Website, Government of Canada,  http://www.international.gc.ca/rights-droits/index.aspx?lang=eng accessed Feb. 23, 2016

[7] Ibid., “Palestinian Civil Society Call for BDS”

[8] Ibid., “Canadian Policy on Key Issues in the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict”

[9] Ibid., “Palestinian Civil Society Call for BDS”

 

Open Letter to Conservative MP Todd Doherty (Cariboo – Prince George): Canadian Parliament overwhelmingly voted in favour of a motion condemning the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement against Israel.

BoycottHdr

Arthur Topham
4633 Barkerville Highway
Quesnel, B.C. V2J 6T8
Home Phone: 250 992 3479
radical@radicalpress.com

March 28th, 2016

MPToddDoherty

MP Todd Doherty
House of Commons
Ottawa, Ontario
Canada
K1A 0A6
Telephone: 613-995-6704
Fax: 613-996-9850
Constituency Office(s)
1520 – 3rd Avenue (Main Office)
Prince George, British Columbia
V2L 3G4

Dear Todd Doherty,

Re: Canadian Parliament overwhelmingly voted in favour of a motion condemning the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement against Israel.

On February 22nd Canada’s Parliament took the unprecedented move of overwhelmingly voting (229-51) in favour of a Conservative motion condemning the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement against Israel.

The motion stated: “That, given Canada and Israel share a long history of friendship as well as economic and diplomatic relations, the House reject the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement, which promotes the demonization and delegitimization of the State of Israel, and call upon the government to condemn any and all attempts by Canadian organizations, groups or individuals to promote the BDS movement, both here at home and abroad.”

I noted that you Todd, the Conservative member of parliament for Cariboo – Prince George, were one of those who voted in favour of this lopsided, hypocritical motion; one based upon outright fabrication, misinformation and an abject refusal to recognize and adhere to international law.

The accusation that the BDS movement is “demonizing and delegitimizing the State of Israel” is utterly absurd given that’s its primary purpose is to promote, by peaceful actions, international law and the rights of the Palestinian people.

The bigotry of it all is shown by the current status of Canada’s own actions wherein it has imposed sanctions on 22 nations other than Israel and for so-called “human rights violations” that pale in comparison with the crimes that Israel has committed against the Palestinians. Yet, when it comes to this one particular rogue state suddenly any peaceful efforts on the part of Canadians to address this longstanding issue are condemned by both the Liberal and the Conservative parties.

It’s an established fact that Israel has been the subject of at least 77 UN resolutions since 1955 and has been criticized in at least 26 resolutions for its violations of U.N. Security Council resolutions.

Amnesty International reported in 2015 that they’d found “compelling evidence of serious violations of international humanitarian law by Israeli forces” and “strong evidence of war crimes and possible crimes against humanity” during Israel’s 2014 assault on Gaza.” Evidence of similar war crimes and crimes against humanity were also found during Operation Cast Lead in 2008.

This bogus attempt on the part of the Liberals and Conservatives to cover up Israel’s crimes and perpetuate the illusion that Canadians are just too ‘friendly’ with Israel to allow its citizens to peacefully choose whether or not to boycott Israeli products and therefore must be condemned for exercising their constitutional rights is, in itself, a despicable act and a crime against humanity that ought to be severely condemned.

It’s time Todd that you, as my representative voice in Ottawa, started standing for real Canadian values, our Constitutional rights and international law rather than always cowering and bowing in obeisance to a rogue foreign state whose actions ought to be censured rather than applauded.

Sincerely,

Arthur Topham
Cottonwood, B.C.

——

cc: Autumn Macdonald editor@quesnelobserver.com , Alternative Media, Facebook

Vancouver Police Brutally Attack Family in Pacific Park Place Housing Co-operative by Alicia Barsello

PoliceBrutalityHdr

Vancouver Police Brutally Attack Family in Pacific Park Place Housing  Co-operative  

by Alicia Barsello

On Sunday 13th of March 2016 Vladimir Tchaikoun’s belief in Canadian democracy was shaken. The aviation and marine engineer left the Ukraine in 1988 in search of a just society and a fair standard of living, but suddenly felt he had returned to the kind of situation one might find in a police state. He and his family were the victims of police violence.

Around 7:30 pm, Vladimir and his daughter Alicia were preparing dinner in their home at the Pacific Park Place housing cooperative (5810 Battison St in Vancouver, between Kingsway and E.43rd), when they heard a knock at the door. They found two policemen dressed in assault gear.

“Are you Vladimir?” asked one of the policemen. Vladimir asked why they were there, and one of them answered that they could not say and asked to see Vladimir’s wife. Vladimir asked Alicia to call her mother who was in the second floor of the house, and, as soon as Alicia directed herself towards the stairs, the police pushed the door in and Vladimir with it.

Alicia heard the noise and turned to see the two policemen beating her father. She ran towards them yelling “Stop!”, but one of them shoved her away with his arm, saying “You guys have caused too much trouble around here” and ordered her upstairs. Vladimir continued to be beaten and screamed for help. He recalls how the police grabbed both his arms, kicked him in the legs with their boots and beat him repeatedly on the face and head, causing him to bleed profusely.

Alicia began to scream for help from the second floor window. Her neighbours came out astonished. Vladimir is a longtime member of the housing co-op, and known for his active involvement. This is not to say that the coop board has appreciated this involvement.

He has shown his support for families in danger of eviction by the board, has advocated for transparency in the selection of new occupants, has asked that decisions be taken democratically. Vladimir places a high value on Canadian democracy. He believes in his rights. “Sometimes one has to stand on one’s principles,” he says, “and what makes Canadian democracy what it is, is that one can do so without fear of reprisals.”

When Vladimir’s son Yuri and his mother rushed downstairs to Vladimir’s aid, they found that he had fallen to the floor and the policemen were hitting him with their batons on various parts of his body. Vladimir heard one of the policemen say to the other: “Get the taser” and yelled out Yuri’s name. When this happened, more than a dozen more police came inside the house. The eight police cars that had brought them were stationed outside.

VladimirPic

Yuri went towards his dad asking the policemen to stop beating him and was himself pushed and punched in the face twice, then shoved onto a chair and handcuffed. Yuri’s mother, who came to their defense pleading for them, got kicked twice in the stomach. The police threatened her and Alicia with their taser guns and spray and ordered them upstairs.

In a panic, Vladimir’s wife kept repeating her questions: “Why?!” – Why the beatings?!  Why were they there?! One of the policemen replied by commanding her to show her ID and then arresting her, placing handcuffs around her wrists. Alicia’s cries of why her mother was being arrested were answered by the arresting policeman who said that he was arresting her mother because she had touched his sleeve.

Vladimir, who had been kept face down, was bleeding from his nose, ears and head when the police stood him up, handcuffed him, and dragged him from his house and made him sit on the curb next to his son. When they threw them both into a police car, Vladimir could see his wife in another police car and knew they had arrested her also.

Alicia was ordered out of the house which was ‘now a crime scene’, was given no time to get her jacket or her house keys and remained locked out of the house the whole night.

Because of the harm they had inflicted, the police sent Vladimir to the hospital in an ambulance before taking him to jail. Vladimir was x-rayed, had his bones examined, his face cleaned up, and was vaccinated against tetanus. They took no pictures. Vladimir wanted pictures taken but he did not feel safe asking as one of the policemen was always watching him.

After the hospital, Vladimir was taken to a police station, possibly the one at Main and Hastings. He was put in a cell. He can’t remember whether they took his clothes off, but he does remember that they photographed his face. He doesn’t remember whether they photographed other parts of his body.

He was unable to get help from a nurse there – or even avail himself of the antibiotic cream and the compress that the hospital had given him – because to do so, he would have had to authorize the disclosure of his medical records.

The next day, just before he left the jail for home after an excruciating night, he was told that he will have to appear in court on April 4th 2016 at 9 am to answer a charge of assaulting a peace officer (!)

Vladimir’s wife and son also spent the night in jail and have also been charged with assaulting a peace officer.

Vladimir, his wife and his two children still do not understand the assault, or the night spent in jail, or the charge after that. Canada is no longer the safe haven to which Vladimir emigrated in August 1998. Something needs to be done to right a wrong so egregious and traumatic. Whether we are able to do so will be an acid test for our democracy.

—-

THE TIME OF THE TOMB: Meaning of the Death on the Cross from The Urantia Book

TombTimeHeader

THE TIME OF THE TOMB

MEANING OF THE DEATH ON THE CROSS
P. 2016 – 2017
THE URANTIA BOOK

ATEDITOR0216

[Editor’s Note: Ever since a child I was unable to understand or appreciate the notion that Jesus Christ had died for my (or our) sins. For starters, as a little child I had no concept of what “sin” was therefore no idea of why anyone should have to die in such an horrific manner in order to make amends for anything that I might have done unbeknownst to myself.

The image of Jesus Christ – taught to me in a general way as a love-filled human being who spent his life trying to teach people that God was a living, loving Spirit Father who dwelt within each of us – hanging on a wooden cross with spikes driven through his bloodied hands and feet, was as offensive to my sensibilities as anything imaginable.

Even though I grew up outside of any organized religious sectarian indoctrination and didn’t dwell that much on Christianity per se it always irked me (especially around the time of Easter) that the church and priesthood continually focused upon this notion that Jesus had willingly given up his life in such a barbaric manner in order to absolve all the sinners from their own conscious, deliberate, willed actions.

It wasn’t until I came across The Urantia Book that I finally discovered within it the words that best expressed how I had felt about the crucifixion throughout my life.]

CRUCIFIXION1

MEANING OF THE DEATH ON THE CROSS
P. 2016 – 2017
THE URANTIA BOOK

Although Jesus did not die this death on the cross to atone for the racial guilt of mortal man nor to provide some sort of effective approach to an otherwise offended and unforgiving God; even though the Son of Man did not offer himself as a sacrifice to appease the wrath of God and to open the way for sinful man to obtain salvation; notwithstanding that these ideas of atonement and propitiation are erroneous, nonetheless, there are significances attached to the this death of Jesus on the cross which should not be overlooked. It is a fact that Urantia has become known among other neighbouring inhabited planets as the “World of the Cross.”

Jesus desired to live a full mortal life in the flesh on Urantia. Death is, ordinarily, a part of life. Death is the last act in the mortal drama. In your well-meant efforts to escape the superstitious errors of the false interpretation of the meaning of the death on the cross, you should be careful not to make the great mistake of failing to perceive the true significance and the genuine import of the Master’s death.

Mortal man was never the property of the arch deceivers. Jesus did not die to ransom man from the clutch of the apostate rulers and fallen princes of the spheres. The Father in heaven never conceived of such crass injustice as damning a mortal soul because of the evildoing of his ancestors. Neither was the Master’s death on the cross a sacrifice which consisted in an effort to pay God a debt which the race of mankind had come to owe him.

Before Jesus lived on earth, you might possibly have been justified in believing in such a God, but not since the Master lived and died among your fellow mortals. Moses taught the dignity and justice of a Creator God; but Jesus portrayed the love and mercy of a heavenly Father.

The animal nature – the tendency toward evildoing – may be hereditary, but sin is not transmitted from parent to child. Sin is the act of conscious and deliberate rebellion against the Father’s will and the Sons’ laws by an individual will creature.

Jesus lived and died for a whole universe, not just for the races of this one world. While the mortals of the realms had salvation even before Jesus lived and died on Urantia, it is nevertheless a fact that his bestowal on this world greatly illuminated the way to salvation; his death did much to make forever plain the certainty of mortal survival after death in the flesh.

Though it is hardly proper to speak of Jesus as a sacrificer, a ransomer, or a redeemer, it is wholly correct to refer to him as a saviour. He forever made the way of salvation (survival) more clear and certain; he did better and more surely show the way of salvation for all the mortals of all the worlds of the universe of Nebadan.

When once you grasp the idea of God as a true and loving Father, the only concept which Jesus ever taught, you must forthwith, in all consistency, utterly abandon all those primitive notions about God as an offended monarch, a stern and all-powerful ruler whose chief delight is to detect his subjects in wrongdoing and to see that they are adequately punished, unless some being almost equal to himself should volunteer to suffer for them, to die as a substitute and in their stead. The whole idea of ransom and atonement is incompatible with the concept of God as it was taught and exemplified by Jesus of Nazareth. The infinite love of God is not secondary to anything in the divine nature.

All this concept of atonement and sacrificial salvation is rooted and grounded in selfishness. Jesus taught that service to one’s fellows is the highest concept of the brotherhood of spirit believers. Salvation should be taken for granted by those who believe in the fatherhood of God. The believers’ chief concern should not be the selfish desire for personal salvation but rather the unselfish urge to love and, therefore, serve one’s fellows even as Jesus loved and served mortal men.

Neither do genuine believers trouble themselves so much about the future punishment of sin. The real believer is only concerned about present separation from God. True, wise fathers may chasten their sons, but they do all this in love and for corrective purposes. They do not punish in anger, neither do they chastise in retribution.

Even if God were the stern and legal monarch of a universe in which justice ruled supreme, he certainly would not be satisfied with the childish scheme of substituting an innocent sufferer for a guilty offender.

The great thing about the death of Jesus, as it is related to the enrichment of human experience and the enlargement of the way of salvation, is not the fact of his death but rather the superb manner and the matchless spirit in which he met death.

This entire idea of the ransom of the atonement places salvation upon a plane of unreality; such a concept is purely philosophic. Human salvation is real; it is based on two realities which may be grasped by the creature’s faith and thereby become incorporated into individual human experience: the fact of the Fatherhood of God and its correlated truth, the brotherhood of man. It is true, after all, that you are to be “forgiven your debts, even as you forgive your debtors.”

•••+•••

FREEDOM OF SPEECH IN CANADA IS STILL UNDER ATTACK! HELP ARTHUR TOPHAM DEFEND CANADA’S CHARTER RIGHT TO FREEDOM OF SPEECH

SUPPORTFREEDOMOFSPEECH

ATEDITOR0216

Dear Supporters of Freedom of Speech,

After a somewhat welcome hiatus in this seemingly endless struggle to retain our basic rights and freedoms; one that commenced after the trial in mid-November, 2015, the next stage of battle is about to begin.

On March 29, 2016 I will once again be appearing in the Quesnel Supreme Court to hopefully “fix a date” for the upcoming Constitutional challenge to Canada’s censorship laws contained in Sec. 318 to 320 of the Criminal Code.

When the actual date will be set is yet to be determined but it is necessary in the interim time period proceeding the hearing to raise an additional $2,000.00 in order to pay for an Expert Witness to appear on my behalf when the Charter issue is argued.

If there were a mere 200 Canadians willing to part with $10.00 the problem would be solved in short order but things don’t always turn out to be that easy.

Given the new Liberal government’s pro-Israel stance and its recent “condemnation” of individuals and groups who are supporting Palestine via the BDS Movement it doesn’t look like there’s going to be any changes in the government’s position with respect to “standing with Israel” on any matters dealing with human rights abuses, international law or ridding the nation of these noxious “Hate Propaganda” laws that were insinuated into Canada’s jurisprudence over the past half century of Zionist Jew lobbying on behalf of the state of Israel.

The upcoming challenge to this legislation will determine once and for all whether or not Canada will adhere to the spirit and intent of its Charter of Rights and Freedoms or continue to bow down to foreign interests and sacrificing its citizen’s fundamental rights.

Please try to assist in this process by making a small donation to the cause. My GoGetFunding site can be found here: http://gogetfunding.com/canadian-publisher-faces-jail-for-political-writings/

Standing for Canada and our democratic ideals I remain,

Sincerely,

Arthur Topham
Pub/Ed
The Radical Press
Canada’s Radical News Network
“Digging to the root of the issues since 1998”
––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

FREEDOM OF SPEECH IN CANADA IS STILL UNDER ATTACK!

CANADIAN PUBLISHER FACING JAIL FOR POLITICAL WRITINGS NOW PURSUING A CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGE TO CANADA’S NOTORIOUS “HATE PROPAGANDA” LEGISLATION!

Canada’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms under Sec. 2b of the Charter states:

Fundamental Freedoms

2. Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms:

((b) freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication;

Dear Free Speech Supporters,

My name is Arthur Topham and I am the owner, publisher and editor of the online alternative News site RadicalPress.com which has been operating in Canada since 1998. Since 2007 I have been involved in legal battles with the Canadian government – first the Canadian Human Rights Commission (2007) and now the federal legal system (2012) over alleged offences that purportedly violate Canada’s “Hate Propaganda” laws (Sections 318 – 320) of the Canadian Criminal Code (CCC).

On May 16th, 2012 I was charged with a Sec. 319(2) ccc “Hate Propaganda” violation. I was arrested and jailed and my home was entered illegally by the RCMP’s “Hate Crime Team” who proceeded to steal all of my computers and electronic files. Since that date I have been involved in a protracted and onerous legal battle, first with the British Columbia provincial court and now with the British Columbia Supreme Court.

My trial, known as R v Roy Arthur Topham, finally got underway Monday, October 26, 2015 in Quesnel, B.C., twelve hundred and fifty-eight days (1258) after my arrest on May 16, 2012. The Indictment stated that I, Arthur Topham, did “willfully promote hatred against an identifiable group, people of the Jewish religion or ethnic origin, contrary to Section 319(2) of the Criminal Code.”

I was charged on two separate occasions using the same section of the criminal code (Sec. 319(2)) and after a 14-day trial ending on November 12th, 2015 – presided over by Supreme Court Justice, Mr. Bruce Butler and consisting of a 12-member jury of my peers (8 women and 4 men) – I was found Guilty on the first charge (Count 1) and Not Guilty on the second charge (Count 2).

Given that both counts were based upon the same section of the criminal code, i.e., Sec. 319(2) the dual and conflicting verdicts pose a serious legal problem which will be challenged in the days ahead.

What this now means is that I am moving on to the next stage of the legal battle by challenging the Constitutional legitimacy of the actual section of the Canadian Criminal Code (Sec. 319(2) now containing the infamous “Hate Propaganda” legislation which threatens freedom of expression for all Canadians.

The future of Sec. 319(2) of Canada’s Criminal Code will depend in part on the outcome of the planned Constitutional challenge. On March 29, 2016 I will be attending court again to “fix a date” for the upcoming legal challenge. It could be set for sometime in April or May or possibly even further into the year. In the interim period leading up to that challenge I remain free to publish and carry on with soliciting for funding in order to persevere in my efforts to have this unconstitutional section of Canada’s Criminal Code repealed.

The next crucial step demands additional funding to defray the cost of paying an expert witness to appear (via video) at the planned Constitutional challenge. I must raise an additional $2,000.00 in order for this to happen and time is of the essence.

Should the challenge to Sec. 319(2) fail then the next step will be an appeal of the guilty verdict in Count 1.

I continue to have the support of the Ontario Civil Liberties Association. Please see here Ontario Civil Liberties Association and here http://ocla.ca/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/2014-09-24-Letter-OCLA-to-AG-of-BC.pdf and here OCLA writes to Attorney General Anton on September 24, 2014

For the most recent account of the proceedings regarding the trial and future plans to undertake a Constitutional challenge please go here:

Regina v Radical Press Legal Update # 25 December 4th, 2015

I NEED YOUR ASSISTANCE STILL IN ORDER TO WIN THIS CASE. The purchasing of the court transcripts of the trial and now carry on with the challenge to the legislation require me to ask for further financial support in order to win this battle to protect Canada’s Constitutional Rights and Freedoms as contained in the Charter.

Please try to donate online using the GoGetFunding site but if you are unable to do so then try helping out by sending either cash, a cheque or a Money Order to the following postal address. Please make sure that all cheques or Money Orders are made out to – Arthur Topham – and sent to:

Arthur Topham
4633 Barkerville Highway
Quesnel, B.C.
V2J 6T8

Thank You so much!

Remembering Obama’s “Shock and Awe” bombing of Libya 5 years ago today and how the “Antiwar” Movement blew it.   By Philip C. Restino, Jr.

Libya5yrsH2

Remembering Obama’s “Shock and Awe” bombing of Libya 5 years ago today and how the “Antiwar” Movement blew it.

By Philip C. Restino, Jr.
Central Florida Veterans For Peace
March 19, 2016

March 19th marked the 5th anniversary of the first African-American President unilaterally, and without provocation, ordering the U.S. “Shock and Awe” bombing the crap out of his African brothers and sisters in the sovereign North African nation of Libya. Not only that, he did so without even bothering to go to Congress and at least lie to them like his predecessor President George W. Bush did with his own “Shock and Awe” bombing of Iraq 8 years earlier. Just a few days after the bombing of Libya I spoke about it with Joyce Riley, host of the popular nationally syndicated radio show The Power Hour. See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A1QsR6D13o4

The horrific destruction and loss of life and order in Libya over the 5 years since Obama’s “Shock and Awe”, along with the exporting of its growing destabilizing violence to Syria and Iraq, is pretty clear. However, we also need to recognize … and more importantly, learn the lesson from … how the “antiwar” organizations’ refusal to call for President’s Obama’s impeachment following his blatantly illegal March 19, 2011 bombing of Libya has allowed for Obama to do the same with Syria and Iraq again with even less resistance and with total impunity to the point of risking World War III.

Former U.S. Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney publicly endorsed our Central Florida chapter of Veterans For Peace’s resolution calling for the impeachment of President Obama for war crimes on that very day (March 19, 2011) in a prompt and direct response to my email to her asking for her public endorsement. Dr. McKinney was actually in Libya at the time with a delegation witnessing the U.S./NATO bombing of Libya, as was later documented in the 2012 book The Illegal War on Libya which Cynthia McKinney edited. See http://www.claritypress.com/McKinney.html

Screen Shot 2016-03-20 at 9.22.23 AM

International Law Professor Francis Boyle had already endorsed our Impeach Obama for War Crimes resolution in 2010. Later that summer it was voted down for the 2nd year in a row at the Veterans For Peace national convention … however with much more support for it than when it was first presented by us at the 2009 VFP national convention. Following the “Shock and Awe” bombing of March 19, 2011, Professor Boyle was quick to initiate a campaign calling for the impeachment of President Obama over his illegal and unprovoked attack on Libya and made an excellent case for it on the Jack Blood Show a week or so afterwards, on March 30, 2011. See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BfvMlyCnjDs

Larry Pinkney, a former Black Panther and 10-year political prisoner, ran the article “Is it time to impeach Obama?” in his “Keeping it Real with Larry Pinkney” column in the Black Commentator on July 21, 2011 calling for President Obama’s impeachment for the same war crimes, and then some, cited in Veterans For Peace’s and other “antiwar” organizations’ prior calls for impeaching President Bush. See http://www.blackcommentator.com/436/436_kir_impeach_share.html

It should be noted that Larry Pinkney also promptly and very publicly endorsed our Central Florida chapter of Veterans For Peace resolution calling for the impeachment of President Obama for war crimes; and it was just weeks later that the rank and file membership of Veterans For Peace passed the resolution at its national convention on the 3rd year in a row that it had been up for a vote. However, the national leadership of Veterans For Peace refused to send the same official letter to the members of Congress calling for impeachment proceedings of the Democrat President Barack Obama, let alone alert the media and make a public call for it, as they had so strongly done for their earlier resolution to impeach Republican President George W. Bush. See the timeline here: http://cflveteransforpeace.org/timeline-to-veterans-for-peaces-vote-to-impeach-obama-2009-2013-2/

Screen Shot 2016-03-20 at 9.20.09 AM

I’m firmly convinced that the “antiwar” organizations totally blew a fantastic opportunity to actually have slowed, if not stopped, the 9/11 Wars with their refusal to apply to the Democrat War Criminal President Obama the same standard they had set with their prior case for impeaching the Republican War Criminal President George W. Bush followed by a strong public call for it. Of course in our 2-party political structure, the so-called “left” calling for the impeachment of a Republican President would not likely lead to an actual removal of the Republican President from office unless members of Congress from the same party would significantly join in the call for his impeachment. Not surprisingly, that turned out to be the case in the antiwar left’s strong and just public call for impeaching Republican President George W. Bush.

Again, the so-called “antiwar” organizations after having spent years making the clear and compelling case for impeachment of the Republican President George W. Bush for his illegal invasions and wars of aggression (the 9/11 Wars) now had the opportunity of a lifetime to finally rein in the position of the U.S. President’s ability to wage such illegal wars with impunity simply by applying the same standard of the same public call for impeachment to the Democrat President Obama for his own command over and continuation of those same illegal wars … not to mention his initiating even more of his own illegal wars, invasions and related war crimes. See “Impeach Now or Forever Hold Up Peace” from June 27, 2011. Instead, the national leadership of Veterans For Peace, along with other organizations from the “antiwar” left, not only chose not to call for Obama’s impeachment but actively suppressed such calls from its rank and file. See https://www.lewrockwell.com/2011/06/philip-c-restino-jr/impeach-now-or-forever-holduppeace/

Screen Shot 2016-03-20 at 9.40.16 AM

If the so-called “antiwar” left had called for impeaching the Democrat War Criminal President Obama for the same crimes cited in its prior call for impeaching the Republican War Criminal President Bush, there would be nowhere to pass the political football, the partisanship would be out the window, the people’s remedy of impeachment would have teeth again and the office of the President of the United States would actually have to face accountability for its illegal actions. As a result of the “left cover” provided the Democrat War Criminal President Obama over the past 7+ years, the ability of anyone … Democrat, Republican or whatever … occupying the office of President of the United States to bomb and kill whomever, wherever, and whenever he wants with total impunity has been firmly established in practice.

I can’t help but think of all the Gold Star Mothers, and mothers “over there”, who have been added to the ranks since our Central Florida chapter of Veterans For Peace’s first call for impeachment of the Democrat War Criminal Obama following the publication of former CFVFP member Tom Santoni’s “IMPEACH OBAMA!” article written February 2, 2009 in response to President Obama’s unilateral, illegal … and without provocation … deadly drone-bombing of unsuspecting targets in Pakistan. I can’t help but wonder if the “antiwar” movement had put adherence to principle above loyalty to political party and ideology and joined our legitimate call for impeaching President Obama at that time, would the widespread practice … and to a troubling extent, acceptance … of drone bombing anyone, anywhere and at anytime simply because the President of the United States or one of his underlings says so be what it is today. See http://cflveteransforpeace.org/impeach-obama/

Screen Shot 2016-03-20 at 9.36.31 AM

The harm done by the stubborn partisanship of the “antiwar” left … both in the death and destruction abroad and in the neutralizing of the “power of the people” here at home, in particular the people’s constitutional remedy of impeachment … needs to be acknowledged and widely discussed.

— 

Phil Restino is a peacetime veteran, having served in the U.S. Army Infantry from 1983 to 1985. He was a founding member of the Central Florida chapter of Veterans For Peace (Col. Bob Bowman Memorial Chapter) in August 2005 and has served as one of its chapter co-chairs ever since. For more information, please visit www.cflveteransforpeace.org

For those who might be interested and could spare the time to listen to on-air discussions I’ve had with radio hosts detailing as an “insider” of sorts of the so-called “antiwar” organizations as to what I know happened and how it happened and what could have been, please take a listen to the following clips.

Re-Invading Iraq and the Failure of Antiwar Orgs (6:55 min)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NKhzOiA5K2A

VFP Calls to Impeach Obama for his War Crimes (8:42 min)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vnJGmzhd6-A

Calls to Antiwar Leaders: Impeach Now or Forever Hold Up Peace (2:08 min)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3CcYLW77upg

10-yr VFP Chapter Leader discusses Antiwar Orgs’ suppression of 9/11 Truth (53:59 min)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=td20vX3xk70

 

Toxic Beef: Sacred Cows & Left Gatekeepers Joe Giambrone

toxic-beef copy

ATEDITOR0216

Edito’s Note: Like many in the Alternative News Media I initially began my career in publishing lauding the work of Professor Noam Chomsky. Some of his earlier works on events in Guatemala and Nicaragua as well as his books on the Palestinian/Israeli problem were most helpful to me in getting a start in trying to untangle the massive web of lies, half-truths and outright deceptions that the msm kept dispensing to the general public surrounding these historic events. These were years well in advance of 9/11. After the attack on the Twin Towers and Building 7 by the Israeli/Mossad/CIA/FBI matrix forces Noam Chomsky’s reactions to this paradigm event began to reveal his own true motives and as writer Joe Giambrone clearly illustrates in his article, Professor Chomsky’s ongoing denial of the “who’s who” in this classic false flag has torn his once impeccable status as historic researcher to tatters. Truth always prevails in the end.]

Toxic Beef: Sacred Cows & Left Gatekeepers

Joe Giambrone

Some may be following my ongoing challenge to Professor Noam Chomsky and his clearly misleading spin regarding the September 11th controversy. Or perhaps not, since none of the outlets which publish his every utterance, like clockwork, will dare publish criticism of the deified thought leader. No rebuttals may appear. My previous pieces established how Chomsky transforms matters of vital public interest, crimes, facts, glaring cover-ups of Congressional reports, into matters of his own personal opinion, which he dismisses and disregards to set an example for others.

My challenge is as much with the deception from Left so-called “alternative” media as it is with Chomsky personally. The demonstrable bias and deliberate misleading of readers (see below) motivates my pieces, such as this one. Many readers, whom I come across, are clearly misled, deluded, and yet proudly ignorant for some odd reason. More on that later, too.

How can an editor look himself in the mirror after being shown to be a serial liar? And a liar not on some trivial gibberish—this isn’t Kardashians—but on the “new American Century,” mass murder, and wars into the foreseeable future?

Media censorship has aided and abetted the perpetrators of the September 11th attacks after the fact. The solution to that editorial guilt is simple self-deception. Censor out the problem (evidence, logic), and so there is no problem; voilà.

Noam Chomsky helps to manufacture conformity. The Professor’s great expertise in media itself is problematic, as so-called “alternative” media looked to him personally for marching orders. It thus empowered Professor Chomsky to define the limits of permissible discourse post-September 11th of 2001.

Chomsky participates in the same Manufactured Consent he once seemed to oppose. The Left foundation-funded press is a different beast than corporate news media, which he and Edward S. Herman wrote about, but its uniformity and its unwillingness to correct itself when shown to be demonstrably wrong is dangerous and a massive institutional failure. The disinformation put out regularly by the Left “alternative” media brings real-world catastrophic implications. War propaganda, in its myriad forms, entails consequences.

Early in the 2000s, Noam Chomsky told the world to ignore the September 11th cover-up.

Result: The entire American Left turned off its critical faculties and let Deep State domestic terrorists get away with their “new Pearl Harbor” and their “Project for a New American Century.” Public opposition to them died out. We became a bi-partisan, unrestrained empire that wages unlimited war around the world with impunity. This is sold to the public every day in the name of “defense.” Never forget 9/11, and the bombing can commence on the next target.

Professor Chomsky and the deciders in so-called “progressive” media helped erase the 9/11 controversy from history. They did the bidding of the imperialists, either intentionally or as useful dupes. Probably it was a combination.

The 9/11 cover-up, an undeniable reality, became a censored topic as it is today. This piece will most certainly NOT be published at The Nation, Mother Jones, The Progressive, Truthdig, Alternet, Fair, Z-Magazine, et al., just as over a decade’s revelations about the 9/11 attacks have been conspicuously omitted from those same journals. The public was marshalled to look elsewhere and to ignore the greatest Treason in the history of this country. The natural enemies of such a crime, the watchdog press, the 4th estate, were transformed into dulled-down head bobbers, stenographers, who like obedient lapdogs pointed elsewhere on command.

That is why it is my well-considered view today that Professor Noam Chomsky is probably the most dangerous propagandist in the Western World. He has directed numerous adherents toward ignorance rather than knowledge, toward opinion and speculation, rather than toward verifiable facts.

This should not be a surprise to people who have challenged Chomsky previously, as when the JFK assassination controversy became the focus of his ire. Chomsky went to work selling his trademark catch phrase: “Who cares?”

Yes, “who cares?” If the CIA blew the President of the United States’ head off in broad daylight, erased reality from history, and created a false reality for the next century? Who could possibly find that problematic? Certainly not Professor Chomsky.

“Take for example all this frenzy about the JFK assassination. I mean I don’t know who assassinated him and I don’t care, but what difference does it make?”

Professor Noam Chomsky

Chomsky cannot find a reason to “care” about any of that, and neither should you. Chomsky similarly came to a pointed lack of empathy regarding the September 11th attacks:

“I mean even if it [a September 11th government conspiracy] were true, which is extremely unlikely, who cares? I mean it doesn’t have any significance.”

Professor Noam Chomsky

Sound familiar? He doesn’t “care” about that either, and neither should his many followers. And guess what? They don’t. The magic spell worked. Proud champions of the most grotesque ignorance imaginable they are bolstered by the marching orders of their idol, and little else. One might wonder what it is Professor Chomsky actually does “care” about?

The JFK hit determined who was actually going to be in charge of the American empire: a democratically elected President or Deep State, unaccountable murderers.

Chomsky also had no basis whatsoever for claiming it “extremely unlikely.” The 9/11 cover-up is not only likely, but real and challenged by many in Congress, even today. Chomsky’s reckless and speculative opinions have substituted for hard facts. He pointedly avoids the facts of the cover-up, and that should be a red flag. Many on the Left have behaved like gullible children accepting his vague speculation while ignoring facts from the FBI and the Congress.

An odd position, Professor Chomsky claims time and again not to “care” about subjects that he writes entire books about. His books have come at the Kennedy and at the 9/11 issues from some strangely oblique angles, avoiding the actual evidence of cover-up and complicity. His books are carefully crafted to establish a general uncaring. Don’t care about John F. Kennedy and his “Camelot” presidency; he was a jerk unworthy of your sympathy. The point is dismissal, not enlightenment about the crime. Chomsky flatly refuses to explore the many glaring anomalies, discrepancies, and suspicious facts involved with those two ongoing cover-ups.

Professor Noam Chomsky plays a role, and it is akin to Orwell’s Emmanuel Goldstein. He is a supposed leader of the opposition, but it turns out—for Winston Smith anyway—to be not the case.

If Professor Noam Chomsky didn’t exist, the Deep State would have to invent him. He has misdirected a significant portion of the American and global public. They have accepted his flawed logic and rhetoric in place of hard facts. Fanciful talk has substituted for evidence regarding the crime of September 11th, the crime of the century. Minds have closed to any alternative sources of information whatsoever, a state of insular ignorance among his tribe that is staggering to behold. Talking to these people one-on-one—his many defenders—is an exercise in psychological extremism, something very much like the Helsinki Syndrome. That is not meant to be an exaggeration.

“What you say to the people collectively in that receptive state of fanatical abandonment remains in their mind like an order given to someone under hypnosis, which can not be wiped out and resists all logical argument.”

-Adolf Hitler

As an exclamation point to the Left Gatekeeper phenomenon, the last time those 28 redacted pages seem to have appeared at The Nation (online), was in July of 2003. There, Robert Scheer, currently of Truthdig (sic) fame, wrote a piece of propaganda that appears to say one thing, but actually says quite a few others instead.

Said Scheer:

“Yet even in its sanitized version, the bipartisan report, long delayed by an embarrassed White House, makes clear that the United States should have focused on Saudi Arabia, and not Iraq…”

“Embarrassed?” A curious word indeed. Not complicit? Treasonous? Felonious? Not a crime, apparently to give “aid and comfort” to the Saudi sponsors of the September 11th attacks, according to Scheer and The Nation propaganda organ. No plain stating of the facts of criminal complicity ever made it into print. An opinion about Bush’s alleged embarrassment was all that was said.

Scheer continued:

“…Bush diverted the war against terror.”

There is no “war against terror.” That is accepting the ridiculous neocon framing of the discussion. Scheer just sold the concept that a “war against terror” was a real thing. More propaganda.

In a shocking bit of hammering home his dubious message, Robert Scheer repeated the previous silliness:

“Quite an embarrassment if the censored pages reveal that the Bush Administration covered up the Saudi connection to the terrorist attacks.”

No, Robert Scheer. That’s high Treason, as defined in our Constitution, Article 3.

While Scheer attempted to spin away these shockers as inconsequential matters of saving face (echoes of Chomsky?), apparently The Nation found even that line of social engineering a bit too risky. This unresolved controversy disappeared from its pages in 2003 and has now been absent for almost 13 years since.

The Perfect Storm of Ignorance

This is not to imply that the Left has been unique in its willful blindness. It seems every niche that you can name has an angle to play regarding the September 11th attacks, spinning them one way or another, and usually for (assumed) partisan political gain.

The Deep State, however, is bi-partisan and persists across administrations, obviously. The two political parties have similar goals, if different game plans to achieve global dominance. Beyond Republican “neocons,” one can merely recall Democratic Party stalwart, and Clinton Secretary of State Madeleine Allbright lamenting: “What’s the point of having this superb military you’re always talking about if we can’t use it?”

It seems quite clear to me that the bi-partisan nature of the 9/11 Treason is the number one reason they got away with it. It was never just Bush/Cheney/Rumsfeld, and that assumption is as erroneous as most others.

The San Diego hijacker cell arrived in America during Bill Clinton/George Tenet’s reign. Tenet’s CIA hid the known Al Qaeda members from the FBI. George Tenet was then kept on as CIA Director by Bush, after the stolen election of 2000. While Tenet made claims of his “hair on fire” in the summer of 2001, because of so many glaring warnings of impending attacks, the truth was more of a ‘pants on fire’ scenario. The San Diego Al Qaeda cell was protected from exposure right up until the 9/11 attacks actually occurred.

In addition to the complaints of FBI Agents involved in trying to stop 9/11, even the Counter-Terrorism Adviser to the White House, “Czar” Richard Clarke has flat out accused Tenet and “fifty” CIA officers of hiding the hijackers from him and thus allowing the 9/11 attacks to happen. That’s corroboration, but that’s not the version we see repeated ad nauseum whenever the September 11th attacks appear in print.

Where is the call to arrest George Tenet for aiding and abetting the September 11th terrorist attacks? Why are these life and death matters of actual “national security” brushed aside and ignored? Tenet was given a shiny medal for his efforts, and every CIA officer who helped mislead the FBI was promoted.

By the way, where’s Chomsky when you need him? Fact after fact, but old Noam can’t bring himself to “care.”

News media repeats the watered-down, official 9/11 for dummies story without any qualification to inform readers about ongoing and criminal cover-ups of the Congressional Joint Inquiry report, and the rest of it. Most media fail to note the sham nature of the 9/11 Commission, which was “set up to fail” as admitted to by two of its so-called Chairmen. It was in fact rigged behind the scenes by Bush operative Philip Zelikow, who censored it and fired staff who wouldn’t go along with the sham. Senator Max Cleland resigned so as not to be a part of another “Warren Commission.” None of this information is particularly difficult to locate, and so there is no excuse for its curious absence in any discussions of the September 11th attacks throughout the media, left, right and centrist.

Some editors have made clear mistakes in judgment, which they refuse to correct for, ignoring all the evidence that has since emerged after their initial opinions were formed. Others simply rejected the disinformation and half-truths floating around out there among the amateur sleuths of the 9/11 Movement, the FUD that seeded the debate with false leads. Many issues turned out to be simply out-of-context mistakes. Much is currently unknown, owing to multiple cover-ups, including the criminal destruction of World Trade Center evidence.

All these factors combine in a perfect storm of American ignorance. The Swiss cheese media biases the discussion against fighting to uncover the truth. Truth has been downgraded, myths elevated.

This climate of ignorance is dangerous to us all. Without truth we live in a world of myths and lies. Be they official lies, ideologically based speculation, or knee-jerk rejectionism, the dismissal of true facts is antithetical to democracy. It is a strategy to disempower all of us, and to shift power toward those who maintain secrets. Rule by myths and cover-up represents the complete collapse of the democratic model of governance. It is no trivial matter.

“Who cares?” Mr. Chomsky. I do.

Take everything you hear from your pet sources of political news with several grains of salt. Left and “progressive” media have been just as reckless and false as any other news sources you might name. Challenge their assumptions, especially when you can prove them wrong, no matter who is making the false claim.

(P.S.

No one has disproven a God damned thing I’ve said in this entire series so far…)

http://www.joegiambrone.us/