German Thought Police Raid Dissident Videographer Alfred Schaefer and Steal His Computers By Paul Fromm

HitlerDartboard

German Thought Police Raid Dissident Videographer Alfred Schaefer and Steal His Computers

By Paul Fromm

PATHETIC! Once again, old communist Angela Merkel’s thought control goon squad has swept down on a dissident, raided and ransacked his home and stolen his computers. News just in: ” “Finally, the police raided today the home in Bavaria on Lake Starnberg of Alfred Schaefer, the German + Canadian retired IBM executive whose amazing videos (with those of his sister Monika) on the so-called holocaust stories and 9/11 have terrified the authorities.”

Screen Shot 2016-08-19 at 10.31.32 AM

9/11 Brainwashing part 1
9/11 Brainwashing part 2

Alfred Schaefer, who made the “Sorry Mom . . .” video —> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E0_BZphQ7Qo , (89K views)
has had his house raided by police in Bavaria. All his computers were taken.

MonikaSchaeferPhoto

Ironically, the Basic German Law of 1949 brought in during the Allied occupation guarantees freedom of speech. However, just as with notions of “liberte” or the “freedom of thought, freedom of belief, freedom of speech and freedom of the press” guaranteed by Mao-lover Trudeau I’s mendacious and weasely Charter of Rights and Freedoms, no one in the increasingly repressive West takes these promises seriously.

The New Unhappy Lords eager to flood the White world with the Third World and replace us with their grim New World Order are in a panic that more and more once complacent people are on to their game and to the phony New Religion of Holocaust designed to keep the masses ashamed, guilty and accepting of imposed “diversity.”

As a German Canadian, I am outraged that my father’s and mother’s generation sacrificed part of their youth and many sacrificed their health or their lives in a fratricidal war against fellow Europeans. Idealistically, they THOUGHT they were fighting for “King and country and democracy.” That, of course, was not the real agenda, but they were well intentioned and brave and that is what they imagined they were fighting for. What a sham, what a waste, what a shame to see the leaden hand of thought dictatorship smashing down doors and seizing computers all for the non-violent expression of a person’s opinion. That’s the very thing my parents’ generation thought they were fighting against.

Paul Fromm
Director
CANADIAN ASSOCIATION FOR FREE EXPRESSION


Additional commentary by Katana 

Alfred Schaefer needs to be commended for his willingness to stand up for the truth about the diabolical lies that make up the so-called “Holocaust”.

Over several years he, like many reading this, has undergone a fundamental change in ones worldview.

An extreme example of this change in world view, is coming to terms with the realization that the so-called “Holocaust” is, in fact, a diabolical hoax against the German people and Whites in general. That the “Nazis” were in fact the “good guys”, while the peoples of the Allied forces were dupes of organized jewry. That organized jewry was the behind the scenes instigator, architect, of WW II (among other major wars).

And, I might add, the true horror of the “Holocaust” is not that it allegedly occurred, but rather, in knowing that it did NOT in fact occur, at all!

And, I might add, the true horror of the “Holocaust” is not that it allegedly occurred, but rather, in knowing that it did NOT in fact occur, at all!

Let that idea sink in.

Because, then one must realize that the fraudsters and promoters of the “Holocaust” lie are in fact, in full control of our societies, now, today!

This is the reason why nearly all people think it is inconceivable that the “Holocaust” did not happen, because instinctively they realize that would mean that “our” governments are the perpetrators, or at least, consenters to a diabolical and continuing fraud. That “our” governments are in fact the enemy of their own people.

Unfortunately that is the case, despite their best efforts to disguise it.

Alfred Schaefer and his sister, Monika, need to be fully supported in whatever way possible, not only for their own sakes but for a future in which truth is valued above carefully crafted deceit.

Thanks,

katana

Talmud-driven Marxist materialism at the root of all discriminatory “hate crime” legislation

TalmudHateCrimes

Talmud-driven Marxist materialism at the root of all discriminatory “hate crime” legislation

ATEDITOR0216

[Editor’s Note: Wallace’s reply to Australian Senator Bernardi is a worthy and required read for those who struggle with the whole notion of political correctness and how and why it suddenly made its appearance on the truth-telling scene over the past half century. While it may be useful to read Senator Bernardi’s article first it’s not necessary in order to appreciate what Mr. Klinck is saying on the topic as a whole.]

Dear Senator Bernardi,

Thanks for your latest bulletin.

The “anti-discrimination” activists are engaging in classic Bolshevik tactics of intimidation and they are using both the legal system and the conditioned naïveté of the general population to use the very constitutional and legal framework which historically we have developed essentially in accord with Christian principles to protect basic natural rights and freedoms, literally and subversively as a reverse instrument of terror, in order actually to destroy them. This is being done with an appeal to our innate sense of decency and essential fairness by inducing in us a guilt complex which renders us helpless and defenceless when we would oppose any issue purely and obviously fabricated in a way that is intended to make everything we think or do appear as having selfish and evil motivations designed to exploit other less privileged people. This strategy is pure, unadulterated cultural Marxism in action.

What people do not seem even to suspect is that this policy derives from Pharisaism—the rule by decree enforced by a self-appointed select few who arrogate to themselves the supreme right to dominate others on the assumption that they alone are divinely destined and ordained to determine, prescribe and adjudicate every aspect of the lives of other persons. There is absolutely no theoretical limit to the measures or degree to which these people will go to establish this power and anyone who thinks that there is a limit to their ambition is sadly, and fatally, deceived. Law is the area of their expertise and it is primarily in Law that they act to establish their tyranny. What did Christ say about “lawyers” and the Pharisees? “Beware the Leaven of the Pharisees!” This no doubt sounds all entirely far-fetched and anachronistic to those who are not schooled in ideological and theological matters—but, sadly and unfortunately, it deals with the metaphysical and practical world in which we live. It all seems almost surreal, but is an obvious and undeniable tragic reality. Those who succumbed in the hell of the Bolshevik Gulag could attest to that ersatz reality wherein all were to be made “equal”—as has, e.g., Alexandr Solzhenitsyn, who could by instinct and observation detect the moral and intellectual decline of the West.

One might ask how this situation can be—or why it should exist. But such questions alone are no solution to our problems, which require sound and practical policies and actions predicated upon realistic principles. The fact of the matter is that our culture has been stripped methodically of virtually any Christian awareness we may once have had and, if Christ was indeed the Great Realist, we have no longer any firm ground upon which to stand. The opinion-making media, the educational system, the clergy and the socio-economic institutions all have been captured and co-opted and in general have thoroughly infected society with false notions about scarcity, morality and the purpose of human existence in general. C. H. Douglas was not making a frivolous or misconceived allegation when he declared that “Society has been hypnotized and only a drastic de-hypnotization can save it.” The problem is fundamentally metaphysical and what must be done is to replace the existing system of false values with an entirely new ethic of social and economic values based upon essential Christian precepts and principles which we must proceed to incarnate in our daily organic affairs. We must give “Flesh” to the “Word” in order to make of it a reality rather than a parody.

In this regard, we must cease our rejection of the Abundance of the Kingdom by outright faithless denial, and the diversion and perversion of our human and natural resources increasingly toward useless and destructive purposes which serve the advantage of third interests. We must establish in place of the existing acquisitive economic and social order one which is properly distributive and does not rely upon ever expanding financial debt. We must assure material security for all persons so that in security faith can “cast out all fear” and, indeed, “move mountains.” We must create a dispensation wherein “Every man can sit under his/her own fig tree and none can make them afraid.” We must discredit and destroy the absurd myth of scarcity and the hurtful circumstances which such belief imposes upon humanity. This must be done so as to empower the individual while diminishing the alleged need for an increased assumption of power by the State.

The existing financial and economic system which insists upon paid “work” as the exclusive source of income, while the opportunities for it are increasingly diminished by the amazing phenomenon of escalating technological efficiency, causes individual insecurity to be increasingly endemic and with it entirely unnecessary, growing and fallacious demands for more “jobs”. Of course where economic survival is dependent upon paid labour everyone clamours for more “work” and demands access to it. In a society that is conditioned to believe that Salvation is conditional upon Works rather than upon Grace, the provision of “Work for All” is regarded as both a moral and practical imperative and no forms of discrimination can be countenanced. In this manner the new religion of universal equality has been established and imposed upon humanity as the supreme, allegedly irrefutable and un-challengeable basis of life and “civilization”. Of course any rigorous attempt to impose equality, with envy as its inherent malevolent inspiration, can only result in absolute tyranny. That is the precise goal which is intended and anyone who doubts it is a fool. This is the inevitable destiny of any who worship Mammon– which is the embodiment of so-called “scientific” Marxist materialism. The God of “”Equality” will destroy human civilization because it denies the very individual creativity and general abundance upon which it can be based and flourish.

Sincerely
Wallace Klinck

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ivfdcpB_fmg
www.socred.org
http://www.social-credit.blogspot.ca
http://www.socialcredit.com.au

https://www.amazon.com/Social-Credit-Philosophy-Oliver-Heydorn/dp/1530390923?ie=UTF8&*Version*=1&*entries*=0
https://www.amazon.com/Social-Credit-Economics-Oliver-Heydorn/dp/1493529765
https://www.amazon.com/Economics-Social-Credit-Catholic-Teaching/dp/1494946262/ref=pd_bxgy_14_img_2?ie=UTF8&refRID=N82A1EGWQ489F2A16J03

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_credit
Major C.H. Douglas on “Causes of War” – part 1 – YouTube
Major C.H. Douglas on ‘The Causes of War’ – part 2 – YouTube
http://social-credit.com/index.html


Screen Shot 2016-08-17 at 8.13.42 AM?

Dear Wallace,

Early in my Senate career I wrote that I got into politics to do something, not to be someone. That intention hasn’t changed in the ten years since.

Sometimes, in politics and life, there are things so important that they need to be defended under any circumstances. For lovers of freedom and jousters in the battle of ideas, one of those principles is freedom of speech.

Be under no illusion, that freedom is under assault like never before in this country.

It is not just the odious and subjective nature of section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act, but the group think that is infecting almost every part of our lives, where citizens are socially bludgeoned into conformity.

Many in the political class, aided and abetted by sections of the media, harangue and condemn anyone who doesn’t fall into line with their PC agenda. We are now expected to accept unquestioningly that there are dozens of self-declared gender identities, supporting traditional marriage means you are a ‘phobe’ and that Hillary Clinton is a trustworthy person to be US President.

Next time you go to a dinner party, see how you fare disagreeing with any of those statements. My bet is at best you’ll be met with uncomfortable silence. If you dare stick up for Donald Trump you’ll probably receive much worse!

Now, some might conclude that this is just the normal course of events with supposedly objectionable ideas subject to the court of public opinion. In normal circumstances that may be correct but things are different now.

The social justice warriors (SJWs) believe that the ends justify the means to stop others from even voicing opinions that don’t comply with their agenda.
Cartoonist Bill Leak produced an image that captured perfectly one of the issues facing many Aboriginal communities. He was condemned as a racist and the SJWs called for his sacking. Kudos to The Australian for refusing to bow to their pressure. I have no doubt that had the skin colour of the cartoon characters been white, there would have been no public outrage.

The message is very clear: don’t criticise Aboriginal communities or risk losing your job. The refusal to confront the truth may help explain why over $30 billion of taxpayer funds has been spent on these communities over the past ten years with little visible improvement in conditions.

We saw a similar thing with the Four Corners program about juveniles in detention in the NT. The ABC report was biased, incomplete and a perfect example of why we can no longer trust sections of our ABC with impartial and factual reporting. The release of a letter written by the journalist involved praising the NT minister responsible in order to gain access to the facility demonstrates how dubious we should be of such ‘exposés’.

I have experienced similar duplicity and cherry-picking of information to suit a pre-determined agenda by some of those linked to the same Four Corners report. Put simply, I cannot regard some of those individuals as credible and unbiased. They have a political world view which they are seeking to pursue through our publicly-funded broadcaster.

But it doesn’t end there. Section 18C of the RDA is now being used as a tool to stifle speech on the basis it may offend or insult someone – not necessarily the person complaining.

The students at a Queensland university excluded from a computer room on the basis of their skin colour are now subject to potential court action. Their crime was to mention the segregation they experienced on a Facebook page. As a result of these innocuous remarks, the complainant supposedly has been incapable of working for several years and wants $250,000 in compensation.
Amazingly, this disgraceful complaint is being considered for trial and these poor students are being subject to the most ghastly and expensive process because they offended someone with a different skin colour who discriminated against them on the basis of their skin colour! A perpetual circle of the grievance industry in action.

My Senate colleague David Leyonhjelm has complained to the Human Rights Commission about being called an ‘angry white man’ by a journalist, not because he is actually offended (although that isn’t a criteria under 18C) but to prove a point. I agree with him. If you simply changed the word white to black, brown or yellow the SJW would spring into a deafening chorus of complaint. Now, such is their silence, you can only hear the crickets chirping, because in their world, only white people can be racist.

I could go on.

We are now being subject to identity politics, pursued through publicly-funded institutions, that only seek to divide us and stifle our freedoms. It is a pervasive step toward Orwell’s totalitarian Newspeak, where words mean whatever the bureaucracy want them to mean.

So what can we do?

Fixing this problem begins with fixing Section 18C of the RDA. While some want to abolish it in its entirety, a good start would be to remove the words ‘offend’ and ‘insult’ from the act. This has even drawn strong support from across the political divide. In the last parliament a Bill to this effect (which I co-sponsored) was introduced but was never voted upon.

It’s time for that to change. In the first week back in parliament I’ll be reintroducing the same Bill with the expectation that this parliament will finally get a vote and expose very clearly who among your elected representatives is interested in protecting our freedoms and way of life. It will also indicate those who have been captured by and surrendered to Orwell’s frightening vision characterised in his book Nineteen Eighty-Four.
Until next week.
?
Cory Bernardi

PS. I will also be presenting a petition to the Senate encouraging reform of Section 18C. You can add your name HERE. Please encourage your friends and family to do the same.

You can also keep up with Cory Bernardi on Facebook.

Whatcott hit with $104 million lawsuit by Toronto Gay Pride Queer Lawyer By Bill Whatcott

Screen Shot 2016-08-13 at 9.52.51 PMScreen Shot 2016-08-13 at 11.25.37 PM

QueerLawyerWhatcott

I hope this class action lawsuit against me and those who choose to stand with me wakes Christians and others up to the reality of what is happening in the West. As homosexual activism and other libertine and anti-Christian movements gain power in Canada, freedom and truth are dying and those cherished principles are being replaced with falsehood, censorship and tyranny.

I have no intention of divulging the identities of anyone who has chosen to help me. My advice for my Christian friends is be wise and courageous. Pray and do what you can to stand against this tyranny. Also if you sent me some cash, offered me a bed, or helped make a Gospel condom, keep your mouths shut if these vengeful homosexual activists come snooping. Ask your friends to keep their yaps shut too. If the Ontario courts are corrupt enough to go along with this and if they put me in jail for not cooperating with this witch hunt, just send me the occasional $20 for prison canteen, so I can enjoy some potato chips and continue to write God pleasing commentaries from my jail cell. As much as possible, I don’t want anyone to make it easy for these homosexual activists and lawyers to silence debate or attain any sort of a financial reward at my or my friend’s expense.

Sincerely,

Bill Whatcott


$104-million lawsuit filed against Toronto Pride parade crashers

Bill Whatcott and his ‘gay zombies’ face possible legal injunction

Published on Fri, Aug 12, 2016

http://www.dailyxtra.com/toronto/news-a … ers-203986

Prominent gay lawyer Douglas Elliott has filed a $104-million class action lawsuit against anti-gay activist Bill Whatcott for crashing the 2016 Toronto Pride parade.

Elliott is also seeking an injunction from the court to prevent Whatcott and his associates from crashing anymore Pride parades in Canada.

Whatcott and several unidentified allies suited up in neon green body suits and disseminated anti-gay literature at the July 3 Toronto parade, calling themselves “gay zombies.”

The lawsuit seeks in part to determine the identities of those who marched with Whatcott and those who financially supported the political stunt through subpoenaed documents.

“Those who paid for his airfare or donated Aeroplan miles to get him to Toronto, those who put him up in Toronto, the people who paid to print the pamphlets: anyone who helped him in any way could be on the hook for $100 million dollars.” says Elliott, whose firm Cambridge LLP is handling the lawsuit.

Screen Shot 2016-08-13 at 11.16.36 PM

Bill Whatcott and his assistants wore green bodysuits to sneak into Toronto’s Pride parade on July 3, 2016. 

The two main representatives of the class action suit are well known in the gay community, Christopher Hudspeth, who owns Pegasus Bar in Toronto’s gay village, and former MPP George Smitherman, Ontario’s first openly gay provincial representative and first openly gay cabinet minister.

Both marched in the parade on July 3, 2016 — and in the case of Smitherman have marched in every parade dating back to 1986. Smitherman says he joined the suit to “do all we can to stamp this hateful individual out.”

“Too often, religion is used as the justification for the vilest of homophobia. From my life on the inside of the fundamentalist movement, I know that promoting homophobia is a great way to raise money from other fundamentalists,” explains Hudspeth, who was raised in a fundamentalist Pentecostal home and spoke of the experience at the Aug 12 press conference in Ottawa announcing the lawsuit.

“There is no doubt in my mind that some fundamentalist group, either here or in the United States, is backing these activities. We need to smoke them out.”

As a gay father, Smitherman says he is deeply offended that Whatcott is once again equating homosexuality with pedophilia.

“My outrage and disgust at the duplicitous means by which Whatcott and his so-called zombies will go to to interrupt this place where love is supposed to be safe and to use the most defamatory statements possible, to regurgitate the most untruthful and disgusting stereotypes with respect to gay and lesbian people, means this [lawsuit] is the right thing to do,” Smitherman says.

Screen Shot 2016-08-13 at 11.15.49 PM

Toronto Homosexual Pride Parade in the 1970s. Sodomite activist George Smitherman sues Bill Whatcott, accusing him of speaking falsehoods and stereotypes, yet the Toronto shame parades prove what Bill is saying is true!

“We need to get right to the heart of the matter, which is the financial resources that allow for this disgraceful person to continue his act, which is hurtful to the thousands and thousands that it has impacted.”

When reached by Facebook, Whatcott tells Daily Xtra that he should have been welcomed into the Pride parade, not sued for participating.

“I just read the statement of claim. It seems to me the poor homosexuals are angry at God and the Gospel. They should have welcomed me in their parade as a much needed truth teller and indeed I was far less disruptive than BLM [Black Lives Matter]. Not sure why the homosexual activists aren’t suing them,” Whatcott writes.

DSCF2629_zpsifcywhen

Angry at God and the Gospel: A Homosexual in the 2016 Toronto sodomite parade 

puts Jesus on his crotch and has profanities directed at Jesus on his behind

If the class action is certified, Elliott says he intends to ask for a summary judgment.

“Where a case is clear cut, there is no point in going through the expense and delay associated with a trial, [so we can] bring a motion to the court for a summary judgment and get it over with, quickly and inexpensively,” Elliott says.

However, they still need to serve Whatcott who, without a permanent address, has been difficult for them to track down, the plaintiffs say.

Whatcott is well known to courts and tribunals in Ontario, Saskatchewan and British Columbia as an anti-gay activist for previous protests, both at parades and on university campuses.

In 2013, the Supreme Court of Canada upheld part of a 2005 Saskatchewan Human Rights Tribunal against Whatcott, for distributing flyers targeting gay and lesbian Canadians.

Before infiltrating the Toronto Pride parade in 2016, Whatcott had similarly faked his identity in 2014 to march along with the Vancouver Pride parade, that time under the disguise of fictitious Calgary Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster, to distribute anti-gay leaflets disguised as condoms.

pic16_zps4de50e2b

Whatcott disguised as Matthew Davidson, the “gay” high priest of the Calgary Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster giving hugs and delivering thousands of desperately needed Gospel condoms to homosexuals and their messed up allies, telling them to keep their pants on and turn their lives over to Jesus so they can have their sins forgiven.

Whatcott told Daily Xtra that he and six of his supporters distributed 3,000 flyers at the Toronto Pride parade, including to parade goers, that warned of risks allegedly associated with gay sex.

20160703_162445_zps7cjsnrra

A Crack Christian Commando from the top secret Christian Truth Activist Gospel Counter Intelligence Unit disguised as a “gay zombie” in a tutu poses with an unsuspecting leatherman at the Toronto Homosexual Shame Parade

The two-page flyer featured graphic photos of anal warts and a dead body described as an “AIDS fatality.” A second page criticizes the “homosexual activism” of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, Ontario Premier Kathleen Wynne and former Liberal defence minister Bill Graham.

They, among other Liberals, are being listed as a subclass to the class action suit, as having been targeted by the content of the pamphlets and singled out for their political affiliations. The two main classes of the suit are those marchers who legitimately signed up and marched in the Pride parade, and those who received copies of the flyer at the parade.


To see the flyers that were distributed at the Toronto homosexual shame parade by the “Gay Zombies” and to stand in solidarity with Bill Whatcott and further distribute these truthful “Zombie Safe Sex” messages before the homosexual activists get them banned download them here!

Front of Flyer

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B_Ol-X … sp=sharing

Back of Flyer

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B_Ol-X … sp=sharing

file.php.jpg

Bill Whatcott

Administrator

 

The Hillary Fix Is In By Brother Nathanael Kapner

The Hillary Fix Is In

By Brother Nathanael Kapner

August 11, 2016 ©

hillaryfix

DEAR DIARY, looks like the world is caving in on Donald Trump.

For knowing that warmongering Jews run America’s security apparatus, I’m inclined to say that Hillary’s their gal and will do anything they can—and they’re capable of pulling off false flags and all kinds of crisis events—to get her in the White House.

Clinton’s a known quantity and they’ve had her on a short leash for a long time. Her stint at the State Department is proof enough she shills for the Jews.

Now, just this week a group of neocon Jew “national security experts” had their synagogue buddies at the Jew-owned press announce their Open Letter stating that as Republicans they “will not vote” for Trump.

“We are convinced that Trump would be a dangerous President and would put at risk our country’s national security,” wrote the wicked, warmongering Jews.

The top signers are Michael Chertoff – former head of Homeland Security; Eliot Cohen – former Counselor at State; Eric Edelman – former Under Secretary of Defense and Advisor to VP Cheney; Aaron Friedberg – former Deputy for National Security, and a bunch of goys whose jobs depend on sucking up to Jews. (View Open Letter Here.)

Yesterday, former Senate head of DHS, Joseph Lieberman, endorsed Killary.

The fix is in. It’s Killary Clintonstein or bust.

fixinkillary

ONLY LAST WEEK, the wicked Jews Dennis Ross and Andrew Tabler penned a piece for the Jew York Times stating it’s “finally time to bomb” Assad to splithereens.

This was followed by the goy shill for Jew wars, Mike Morell, former acting director of the CIA, while endorsing Clinton, saying the US should kill Russians and Iranians in Syria.

Trump responded to all the Jew jazz with:

“They’re Washington establishment people. Look at the terrible job they’ve done. Look at the mess we’re in. Whether it’s the Middle East or anywhere else. I hadn’t planned on using any of them.

“They don’t feel relevant because of that so they form a group and try to get some publicity hoping that somebody other than Trump wins because that way they can get a job.” (View Entire Story Here.)

itsmyjobcry

Trump’s pro-Israel, all right, and has his own people lined up for foreign policy, yet to this day he keeps on saying:

“If our country got along with Russia, that would be a great thing.

“If we can have a good relationship with Russia and help us get rid of ISIS, frankly, as far as I’m concerned, you’re talking about tremendous amounts of money and lives and everything else, that would be a positive thing, not a negative thing.” (View Entire Story Here.)

Oh, Donald! The Jews don’t wanna hear that! Russia is Jewry’s number one enemy, don’t you know that?

Putin purged the Rothschild money changers long ago and no Jew has real power in Russia’s resurrection of “Symphony of Church and State” where Jews are deep-sixed.

That’s why their lies, “Putin kills journalists who oppose him;” “Putin invaded Crimea;” “Putin sent troops to East Ukraine;” ad infinutum, are plastered all over the Jew-owned press.

(The Atlantic, once run by Christians who took an anti-Israel position, is now overrun by Jews like fatso Jeffrey Goldberg whose big mouth blathers with slanders of Vladimir Putin, a devout Christian.)

That’s why Hillary is saying all kinds of nasty things about Russia and Putin like, “Russia hacked into the party’s emails,” and, “Trump’s a Putin agent.”

Now the mustard’s on the matzah ball.

A new Jew think tank, (Project for a New American Century on steroids), “Center for a New American Security,” sketched out a road map for war that Hillary can roam freely through.

The think tank’s project, Extending American Power, (Robert Kagan, Nudelman’s fat Jewish hubbie and another Jew run it), is sated with Jews who guzzled down six successive dinners while planning slaughter for Killary to execute. (View Appendix Here.)

Bombing Assad, then Iran, on to bigger fish to fry by baiting China and Russia, puts Hillary on Jewry’s silk road to hell.

Yet, in spite of their plans, dear diary, I’m not too depressed about it. The future belongs to Russia not Jewmerica.

Allowing neurotic Jews to run a country is a very bad idea.

Yes, the System Is Rigged By Patrick J. Buchanan

Screen Shot 2016-08-12 at 9.28.56 PM

Yes, the System Is Rigged

By Patrick J. Buchanan

125363_5_

Patrick J. Buchanan

 

“I’m afraid the election is going to be rigged,” Donald Trump told voters in Ohio and Sean Hannity on Fox News. And that hit a nerve.

“Dangerous,” “toxic,” came the recoil from the media.

Trump is threatening to “delegitimize” the election results of 2016.

Well, if that is what Trump is trying to do, he has no small point. For consider what 2016 promised and what it appears about to deliver.

This longest of election cycles has rightly been called the Year of the Outsider. It was a year that saw a mighty surge of economic populism and patriotism, a year when a 74-year-old Socialist senator set primaries ablaze with mammoth crowds that dwarfed those of Hillary Clinton.

It was the year that a non-politician, Donald Trump, swept Republican primaries in an historic turnout, with his nearest rival an ostracized maverick in his own Republican caucus, Senator Ted Cruz.

More than a dozen Republican rivals, described as the strongest GOP field since 1980, were sent packing. This was the year Americans rose up to pull down the establishment in a peaceful storming of the American Bastille.

But if it ends with a Clintonite restoration and a ratification of the same old Beltway policies, would that not suggest there is something fraudulent about American democracy, something rotten in the state?

If 2016 taught us anything, it is that if the establishment’s hegemony is imperiled, it will come together in ferocious solidarity — for the preservation of their perks, privileges and power.

All the elements of that establishment — corporate, cultural, political, media — are today issuing an ultimatum to Middle America:

Trump is unacceptable.

Instructions are going out to Republican leaders that either they dump Trump, or they will cease to be seen as morally fit partners in power.

It testifies to the character of Republican elites that some are seeking ways to carry out these instructions, though this would mean invalidating and aborting the democratic process that produced Trump.

But what is a repudiated establishment doing issuing orders to anyone?

Why is it not Middle America issuing the demands, rather than the other way around?

Specifically, the Republican electorate should tell its discredited and rejected ruling class: If we cannot get rid of you at the ballot box, then tell us how, peacefully and democratically, we can be rid of you?

TrumpAmericaGrt

You want Trump out? How do we get you out?

The Czechs had their Prague Spring. The Tunisians and Egyptians their Arab Spring. When do we have our American Spring?

The Brits had their “Brexit,” and declared independence of an arrogant superstate in Brussels. How do we liberate ourselves from a Beltway superstate that is more powerful and resistant to democratic change?

Our CIA, NGOs and National Endowment for Democracy all beaver away for “regime change” in faraway lands whose rulers displease us.

How do we effect “regime change” here at home?

Donald Trump’s success, despite the near-universal hostility of the media, even much of the conservative media, was due in large part to the public’s response to the issues he raised.

He called for sending illegal immigrants back home, for securing America’s borders, for no amnesty. He called for an America First foreign policy to keep us out of wars that have done little but bleed and bankrupt us.

He called for an economic policy where the Americanism of the people replaces the globalism of the transnational elites and their K Street lobbyists and congressional water carriers.

He denounced NAFTA, and the trade deals and trade deficits with China, and called for rejection of the Trans-Pacific Partnership.

By campaign’s end, he had won the argument on trade, as Hillary Clinton was agreeing on TPP and confessing to second thoughts on NAFTA.

But if TPP is revived at the insistence of the oligarchs of Wall Street, the Business Roundtable, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce — backed by conscript editorial writers for newspapers that rely on ad dollars — what do elections really mean anymore?

And if, as the polls show we might, we get Clinton — and TPP, and amnesty, and endless migrations of Third World peoples who consume more tax dollars than they generate, and who will soon swamp the Republicans’ coalition — what was 2016 all about?

Would this really be what a majority of Americans voted for in this most exciting of presidential races?

“Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable,” said John F. Kennedy.

The 1960s and early 1970s were a time of social revolution in America, and President Nixon, by ending the draft and ending the Vietnam war, presided over what one columnist called the “cooling of America.”

But if Hillary Clinton takes power, and continues America on her present course, which a majority of Americans rejected in the primaries, there is going to be a bad moon rising.

And the new protesters in the streets will not be overprivileged children from Ivy League campuses.

May considers quitting as federal Green leader over anti-Israel vote Michael D. Reid / Times Colonist

May considers quitting as federal Green leader over anti-Israel vote

Michael D. Reid / Times Colonist
August 9, 2016 
Updated: August 10, 2016 

Screen Shot 2016-08-10 at 9.59.50 PM

Elizabeth May says she is weighing whether she should quit as leader of the federal Green Party because of its weekend vote supporting sanctions against Israel.

B.C. Green Party Leader Andrew Weaver is also speaking out against the federal party’s resolution.

May, MP for Saanich-Gulf Islands, said she is struggling with whether she can continue as leader in light of her party’s vote in favour of an anti-Israeli policy during its convention in Ottawa on the weekend.

She said she is not necessarily leaning toward quitting, but it’s an option she is considering.

In an interview Tuesday, she said she was stunned by the vote and described what happened at the convention as “an aberration” caused by abandonment of the usual consensus decision-making process. The hastily adopted policy could draw accusations of anti-Semitism, she said, and she hopes to have Green Party members reconsider.

Convention delegates voted to endorse the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement, also known as BDS. Supporters of BDS are calling for boycotts and sanctions over the way Israel has dealt with Palestinians.

May said that while she voted against the resolution, she doesn’t want to “demonize” groups that support BDS. “I think it’s a terrible idea and I don’t think it’s going to advance the cause of Palestinians,” she said. “One of my options is to step down as leader because that would be a way of triggering a convention.”

The resolution was approved using Robert’s Rules of Order rather than consensus decision-making and that greatly abbreviated the time for debating, she said.

May said she is looking forward to vacationing with her family and going off the grid “in a place far removed from politics.” “It almost sounds absurd that my sense of purpose and commitment to continue as leader of the Green Party has been thrown into crisis by Robert’s Rules of Order,” she said. “I hope after a couple of nights of being able to sleep well, it will become clearer to me what I should do.”

Former Nanaimo-Ladysmith Green Party candidate Paul Manly said he hopes May remains as leader. “I think it would be really unfortunate for her to leave based on this,” said Manly, adding he felt the resolution was being misconstrued by the media as a boycott of Israel. “This has nothing to do with ordinary Israeli citizens or companies in Israel. It’s a boycott of companies that profit from illegal settlements.”

Jo-Ann Roberts, who ran for the Green Party in Victoria, also said she wants May to remain as leader. Roberts didn’t go to the convention because she was attending a wedding.

“I truly hope Elizabeth can find a way to stay on as leader. But, in order for that to happen, she would have to feel that there is a way for the party to make changes to its recent resolution on BDS,” Roberts said. “I have always known Elizabeth to be a person of principle and integrity. She will try and find a way to resolve this issue, but if she can’t, then the party risks losing its most valuable asset.”

Weaver said in a statement the vote supporting BDS “represents a significant step away” from B.C. Green Party values.

“I think the Green Party of Canada needs to take a careful look at their policy process and ask themselves how a policy that goes against Green Party values could have been allowed on the floor of a convention,” he said.

“BDS is a politically motivated movement that damages any attempt at peace in the Middle East by assigning blame to one party. It risks increasing tension and does not represent a responsible or thoughtful approach to a difficult international issue.”

mreid@timescolonist.com

— With The Canadian Press

Related


Source Article

Breaking News – Read All About It! by Mike Walsh

Screen Shot 2016-08-09 at 10.12.02 AM

www.renegadetribune.com/breaking-news-read/
Breaking News – Read All About It!
August 9, 2016 

By Michael Walsh

Screen Shot 2016-08-09 at 10.11.36 AM

Breaking news is that mainstream media is on the ropes and close to being counted out. According to the noted blogger Don DeBar:

Screen Shot 2016-08-09 at 10.11.23 AM

The media has essentially rendered itself irrelevant in the minds and the opinions of a large majority of Americans. I am talking about the American media from CNN to FOX [News] and even including some of the so-called progressive media, like Democracy Now and Pacific Radio, where people do not look to them anymore for authoritative information.

Recent studies reveal that alternative media is now thought to be more credible than mainstream media. An irony is that whilst CNN and ABC News are the most watched channels in the U.S Americans place more trust in Britain’s BBC and The Economist. Not good news; most Brits consider the BBC to be heavily biased.

The Economist too has misplaced confidence in its credibility rating. This was humorously evident when Press Officer Will Stevens based at the U.S. Embassy in Moscow decided to conduct a Twitter poll. He invited his 1,600 followers to decide whether they believed Russia Today’s version of events or those of The Economist. It was an epic Fail: 617 voted for RT and 43 re-tweeted for The Economist.
Screen Shot 2016-08-09 at 10.11.13 AM

Purchase on Amazon

Sales of British newspapers are plummeting by half a million each year. It seems that in desperation to stem the haemorrhage media coverage is moving from the sublime to the ridiculous. The only informative or humorous news is to be found not in newspaper content but in readers’ replies.

The Daily Mail and others in the red-top tabloid stable have only themselves to blame if dwindling numbers of readers poke fun at their newspaper’s triviality, sensationalism or poor journalism. Today’s Daily Mail headline is orgasmic in its frenzied excitement at Britain winning a Bronze Medal at the Olympics. Let’s get out the kiss-me-quick hats, the bunting and why not also organise street parties. The next headline is a real attention grabber: It asks, ‘Should we be Brushing our Teeth Three times Daily.’ This is mainstream media news on the day that British troops invade the sovereign state of Syria in defiance of international law.

Britain’s top read tabloids top the three biggest dead drops. The Sun, Daily Sport and Daily Record all reported doomsday 10% year-on-year drops in readership. Daily Mail sales have fallen 25% since 2010 whilst its debt rose by £199 million to £722 million. The Daily Telegraph lost a calamitous 40.6 per cent drop in readers whilst The Times is down 35.5% and Financial Times is down by 51 per cent. European media is also suffering an irreversible loss of credibility, prestige and readership. According to TrafficEstimate.com Germany’s Der Spiegel lost 14.6% of its traffic over the course of the last year.

International media watchdog News Literacy Centre advises readers:

Screen Shot 2016-08-09 at 10.10.59 AM

We recommend what is known as VIA: Is the story verifiable, independent and accountable? Without it you are in the realm of speculation, opinion, propaganda, advertisement or something else.
No Copyright. Republishing or Sharing Invited.

The Fifth Column: Stimulating journalist, Michael Walsh shuns political correctness. His newspaper columns are popular because of his engaging writing style, élan and incisive Oscar Wilde wit.

CJPME: Green Party BDS Resolution Supports Human Rights by Thomas Woodley

CJPMEBoycott

CJPME: Green Party BDS Resolution Supports Human Rights
For Immediate Release 

Montreal, August 8, 2016 — Canadians for Justice and Peace in the Middle East (CJPME) enthusiastically applauds the Green Party’s decision to support the international Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement. “By voting overwhelmingly in support of this BDS resolution, Green Party members demonstrate their deep concern for the human rights of indigenous Palestinians,” asserted Thomas Woodley, president of CJPME. BDS is a movement applying economic pressure on Israel until it respects the human rights of Palestinians in Israel, the West Bank, and Gaza.

The BDS motion had wide support at the Green Party convention over the weekend. During the debate on the motion, members speaking in support of the BDS motion outnumbered the opponents by approximately 10-to-1. When the vote was taken, the resolution was so overwhelming approved that the chair did not even find it necessary to count the votes. “We are thrilled at the support for the resolution,” enthused Woodley. “This Green Party decision reflects the growing base of public support for the BDS movement and Palestinian human rights.”

The BDS movement is aligned both with international law and existing Canadian policy on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The goals of the BDS movement are, literally, “1) Ending [Israel’s] occupation and colonization of all Arab lands and dismantling [Israel’s] Wall, 2) Recognizing the fundamental rights of the Arab-Palestinian citizens of Israel to full equality, and 3) Respecting, protecting and promoting the rights of Palestinian refugees to return to their homes and properties as stipulated in UN resolution 194.” CJPME observers at the Convention distributed a flyer to Green Party members which cited the international law and Canadian policy which support the demands of the movement.

CJPME has observed that opponents of the BDS movement try to smear it with false accusations of anti-Semitism. Despite this misinformation, however, CJPME believes that more and more Canadians understand the human rights abuses suffered by the Palestinians as a result of Israeli government policy. CJPME has compiled a list of Canadian church denominations, unions, and other organizations which are increasingly signing on in support of the movement. “The BDS movement will inexorably succeed in addressing the injustices suffered by the Palestinians,” asserts Woodley. “BDS will soon become a national debate involving not only the Green Party, but all Canadian political parties.”

###
For more information, please contact:
Thomas Woodley
Canadians for Justice and Peace in the Middle East
Telephone: 438-380-5410
Email CJPME – CJPME Website

Monika Schaefer busking permit still declined by tyrannical authorities Open Letter by Monika Schaefer

Monika Schaefer busking permit still declined by tyrannical authorities

Open Letter by Monika Schaefer

Monika&Buskers copy

 “Who is this Dave Baker to possess such power over a gentle, law-abiding individual, whom he EXCLUDES from normal opportunity on the basis of some Communist-inspired crackpot theory of INCLUSIVENESS?”

~ Robert Klinck

From

Monika Schaefer <monika_schaefer@hotmail.com>
To
dave baker <betabake@hotmail.com>, Richard Ireland <rireland@town.jasper.ab.ca>, gwall <gwall@town.jasper.ab.ca>, varsenault <varsenault@town.jasper.ab.ca>, rdamota <rdamota@town.jasper.ab.ca>, hkempey <hkempey@town.jasper.ab.ca>, bnesbitt <bnesbitt@town.jasper.ab.ca>, dwacko <dwacko@town.jasper.ab.ca>
Cc
jim.eglinski <jim.eglinski@parl.gc.ca>, justin.trudeau <justin.trudeau@parl.gc.ca>, thomas.mulcair <thomas.mulcair@parl.gc.ca>, rona.ambrose <rona.ambrose@parl.gc.ca>, Elizabeth May <elizabeth.may@parl.gc.ca>

Sent
Friday, August 5, 2016 at 4:23 PM

Dave Baker
Habitat for the Arts

5 August 2016

Dear Dave,

Thank you very much for showing me yesterday exactly where you stand on the issue of my busking permit. Before having finally seen you face-to-face for the first time this summer, I had given you the benefit of the doubt. I believed that surely someone else is whispering in your ear, giving you direction. I believed that, because I did not recognize the Dave Baker that I have known since many years, in the curt email which you sent on 23rd July 2016, quoted here:

“We have considered your application for a busking permit in Jasper. In light of your recently publicly proclaimed non-inclusive beliefs we have decided to decline a permit to you at this time….Please see the attached Values and Principles statement.” 

The hostility with which you treated me yesterday, at the “soft opening” of the new library-and-arts facility, gave me quite a clear picture. It became much more obvious to me that it must indeed be you who has made the decision to arbitrarily deny me a busking permit. Your attitude was belligerent and quite frankly, cowardly.

 “You – already – have – the – only – answer – that – you – will – get.” 

Screen Shot 2016-08-07 at 3.31.00 PM

You and I have been generous with each other and with the community in the countless endeavours that we have participated in and shared over the years. Is that all forgotten? It seems you have left your humanity behind.

You have designated yourself judge, jury, prosecutor, and enforcer all at once, on a spurious assumption that I am guilty of a crime, when in fact I am acting in good conscience to rectify past wrongs. My actions are based on my new understanding that the Hollywood version of history we have been taught is indeed full of factual errors.

You made it perfectly clear that answers are not forthcoming to my two questions which I asked in my email of August 1st quoted here:

“There has been a stunning silence from you since the cursory email you sent me on July 23rd, 2016 … I am wondering who you are accountable to, and who the “we” refers to in your (original) message to me. These are two very important questions and I expect that you will be forthcoming with an answer to these…. Monika”

I asked those questions again yesterday, peacefully and in person, and you repeatedly told me “I will not discuss this here, I will not discuss this now. This is a sacred place.” So I asked when and where? When would the answers be coming? Could we set up a meeting please? You then told me point blank “You – already – have – the – only – answer – that – you – will – get.” 

I see… final judgement has been made, and the proverbial jail key has been tossed out.

My first question was about accountability. I received a partial answer from the cover of this week’s Fitzhugh newspaper. The caption under the front-page picture of happy buskers says “Music in the Streets… thanks to a new pilot-project between the municipality and Habitat for the Arts.” For that reason I am sending this to all the town councillors and mayor, as they have a role to play in this. Are they also playing the role of thought police?

The Habitat “Values and Principles” statement is very good. The second paragraph follows (emphases mine), to show the absurdity of your accusation of “non-inclusive beliefs” against me. I contend it is you who is being non-inclusive.

We believe that learning never stops
We know it enhances social inclusion, active citizenship and personal development. 
We embrace new challenges and ideas.
We welcome new methods and change. 
We help each other grow through knowledge exchange and support.

Dave Baker, since you do not want to talk with me, then you simply become part of the wider story. My ‘bcc’ list is growing ever larger, as more and more people from around the world are taking an interest in this story. It is beginning to look like this pretty little town in a National Park and a World Heritage Site is becoming a leader in the totalitarian anti-free-speech direction that Canada is taking.

 

Sincerely,
Monika Schaefer


Cogent Commentary on Dave Baker’s Actions Against Monika Schaefer

by Robert Klinck

Incredibly in this age of unprecedented material abundance, access to the necessities of survival is still conditional on meeting criteria laid down by domineering, puritanical financiers and their political minions.  They can destroy anyone by restricting their ability to secure income.  Who is this Dave Baker to possess such power over a gentle, law-abiding individual, whom he EXCLUDES from normal opportunity on the basis of some Communist-inspired crackpot theory of  INCLUSIVENESS?  I know about this occult power inherent in the employment system from personal experience, having had the administration of the House of Commons deny the existence of my degrees from the University of Alberta for the past 28 years.  Get that – blatant, unrelenting lying on the part of the federal parliament (successive Speakers included), which promulgates laws and regulations to which it says I must conform!  Unseen by the public, bureaucratic animus is given free rein, and protection absolute, against targeted individuals in the corridors of power.  Let’s call this ability on the part of an elect arbitrarily to close avenues of survival, and punish selectively through misuse of the institutions of government, by its proper name:  terrorism.  This immediate, pervasive form is the one the police and judicial authorities should be most assiduously working to eradicate.  But they are blind to it.

 

David Amos – Psychopath: Approach with extreme caution! a Public Safety Announcement from RadicalPress.com

AmosPsychopath

AmosExtremePsycho

David Amos statement by RadicalPress.com

ATEDITOR0216

[Editor’s Note: RadicalPress.com has know of David Amos for over a dozen years now and throughout that extended period of time David Amos has been subjecting RadicalPress.com to a continuous string of unsolicited, defamatory and spineless spam emails.

RadicalPress.com has requested numerous times that David Amos remove the email address for RadicalPress.com from his own list but David Amos has refused to cooperate with said requests and continues with his spamming.

RadicalPress.com is not the only website or individual who David Amos spams with his convoluted, confusing and continuous array of spam.

David Amos monitors RadicalPress.com continuously just like (former) Det. Terry Wilson of the B.C. Hate Crime Team used to (and presumably still does using his current civilian site) as well as the Zionist Jew lobby group B’nai Brith Canada and other Jewish troll sayanim.

Whenever an article is posted David Amos searches out the players and locates their contact emails and then begins spamming and slandering anyone who doesn’t fit into his own circumscribed psychic gulag that he dwells in.

Anyone supportive of justice and truth for Germany and all Revisionists are vilified by David Amos and insulted and referred to as “neo-Nazis” and other unsavoury Jewish spin words.

Judging from his own words David Amos is in full support of Canada’s unjust Hate Propaganda Laws contained in Sec. 318 to 320 of the Criminal Code of Canada.

In 2014 David Amos came out to British Columbia to meet with Frank Frost, Loni Landrud and myself in Prince George, B.C. It was his stated objective to bring along his legal papers and file them in the B.C. court system and that Mr. Frank Frost would assist him in doing so. It was during that period that I photographed Amos.

When the time came for David Amos to walk the walk and act upon his endless talk he chickened out and left it to Mr. Frost to enter into the court record whatever documents that he had brought with him. Frank Frost did this but since doing so all the court records in the Prince George Courthouse now show that there are no files relating to Frank Frost’s own court proceedings. Mr. Frost had earlier on been charged and arrested and incarcerated in the provincial prison in Prince George based upon false accusations from his former common law partner; accusations dealing with Ministry of Children and Family issues.

In conversation with Mr. Frost yesterday (August 7, 2016) he told me that third party interested parties (including the local MLA for the North Cariboo electoral district) who have gone to the courthouse and requested the files on his case have been told that no such files exist! Then, they have been escorted out of the courthouse by the sheriffs in the courthouse.

Mr. Frost now refers to David Amos as David Anus because he is fully aware that Amos is nothing but a self-absorbed, narcissistic asshole who desperately craves attention in order to justify his own addled existence.

One further point about David Amos is the fact that no amount of complaints registered against his spamming practises has resulted in gmail or any other server doing anything to stop him from doing what he does. This leads one to conclude that there’s a strong possibility that Amos is a mole for the RCMP, CSIS and the Jew lobbyists and is excluded from being subject to any anti-spamming rules.

This is but a very brief overview of David Amos. Below I’ve posted one of Anus’s recent spam mails sent out since the Monika Schaefer incident occurred. It is indicative of his manner of communicating and his disregard for anyone working to retain Canada’s right to freedom of speech. Again, as stated, avoid Amos or be prepared to have your email address spammed continuously.]


 

From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Subject: by the looks of what the neo nazi Arty Baby Topham is publishing lately It seems to mean old me that Mayor Ireland of Jasper could use a fierce cyberspace buddy in short order.
Date: August 2, 2016 at 3:55:13 PM PDT
To: mfercho@town.jasper.ab.ca, rireland@town.jasper.ab.ca, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, Radical@radicalpress.com, monika_schaefer@hotmail.com, jim.eglinski.c1@parl.gc.ca, west.yellowhead@assembly.ab.ca, reporter@fitzhugh.ca, editor@fitzhugh.ca, romanesq@shaw.ca, dan.palmer@greenparty.ca, Elizabeth.May@parl.gc.ca, emily.mcmillan@greenparty.ca, publisher@fitzhugh.ca, jcarpay@jccf.ca, jcameron@jccf.ca, paul <paul@paulfromm.com>, Brian Ruhe <brian@brianruhe.ca>, craig.callens@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, “Charmaine.Bulger” <Charmaine.Bulger@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, redicecreations@gmail.com, codohvideo@gmail.com, betabake@gmail.com, hall@uleth.ca, blair.mason@gov.ab.ca, rdoull@aberdeenpublishing.com, lbolton@aberdeenpublishing.com, min.dhariwal@cbc.ca, msampson@cija.ca, Rick.Bidaisee@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, truth@glaringhypocrisy.com, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, “justin.trudeau.a1” <justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, “Paul.Lynch” <Paul.Lynch@edmontonpolice.ca>, sunrayzulu <sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>, patrick_doran1 <patrick_doran1@hotmail.com>, pol7163 <pol7163@calgarypolice.ca>

 
I doubt that any poltitician or cop will step up to the plate. After
all they have failed for 12 years to defend their own reputations from
Barry Winters and his fellow Zionists. So please feel free to forward
to mean old me whatever the neo nazis send you. Trust that I will take
them on with glee.

Perhaps the RCMP, Constable Paul Lynch and his client Barry Winters
would enjoy any emails that Topham’s friends send to the folks in
Jasper as well EH Premier Notley and PM Trudeau “The Younger”?

Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
902 800 0369

When You Write a Letter on Monika Schaefer’s Behalf

When You Write a Letter on Monika Schaefer’s Behalf
July 29, 2016 by admin Leave a Comment

Letters4MonikaHdr

PLEASE ALSO CC IT TO THE MAYOR OF JASPER, ALBERTA & MONIKA & RADICALPRESS.COM
Mayor, Jasper, Alberta, Canada
Richard Ireland
rireland@town.jasper.ab.ca

Please also send Monika a copy as well:
monika_schaefer@hotmail.com

If you can please include a copy to Radical Press:
Radical@RadicalPress.com

Again, this is her crime:

Anthony Hall (View profile)
Faculty
Office: A812H
Phone: (403) 329-2638
Email: hall@uleth.ca
Video denying holocaust causes uproar
Posted by: fitzhugh Posted date: July 13, 2016 In: Archive, Feature,
News | comment : 13
Comments (13)

Mr. X (Complainant in R v RadicalPress.com court case)
July 14, 2016 at 4:47 pm

Monika is repeating a number of well-worn too-clever-by-half
Holocaust denial “tropes” that have been calculated and re-used over
many years. I think it’s reasonable to suggest that unless she’s
clinically insane, that she is aware of this massive historical
genocide and also intended to cause pain and aggravation to Jews and
anyone else who fought or survived the Nazi regime, and deserves to be
brought to book for this. My hat is off to the Jasper Legion, and the
other good townspeople of Jasper who are taking measures to let this
woman know that her pronouncements are deeply racist and ridicule the
memory of the dead. Thank you Fitzhugh for publishing this article.

 
David Raymond Amos
July 16, 2016 at 7:46 pm

As I watched this latest Zionist versus Neo Nazi spit and chew
unfold within another little known newsrag in Alberta that I crossed
paths with in 2014 I figured I would handle it in the same fashion
that I did with the Tony Hall matter in Lethbridge Alberta.. I called
the editor and the the main players reported within the paper then
made a few comments of my own and let it ride because I can no longer
view it because of a paywall.

Conspiracy theories

Trust that I don’t care about their argument but I will say that
anyone who sings the praises of Hitler or Zionists would not be wise
to do so in my presence

In a nut shell I am an agnostic Maritimer who has also run for
public office five times and sued more lawyers etc that most folks can
name. Right now I am rather busy arguing Her Majesty the Queen Dizzy
Lizzy II and her many minions in Federal Court (File no T-1557-15).
Thus this issue does not warrant much of my precious time. That said I
must also say that I do respect other people’s right to free speech
and their religious beliefs. However free speech does have its limits
as defined my the Criminal Code of Canada Sections 300 and 319 in
particular. I confess that I do not have any respect whatsoever for
liars and spin doctors who use religion to prey about others for their
own greedy ends. I have told them so in word and in writing and defy
anyone to argue me in public or better ye a court of law.

For the PUBLIC RECORD I see no need challenge the Integrity of
Monika Schaefer or her political foe Ken Kuzminsk or the RCMP or Susan
Coombes of the Alberta Human Rights Commission.or the Christian Bible
Pounder, Arty Baby Topham and his many buddies such as Byron Prior,
Paul Fromm,Alex Hunter, Jim Fetzer, Frank Frost, Werner Bock, Wayne
Prante, Brian Ruhe, Tony Hall, or the evil ghosts of Doug Christie Jim
Townsend, John Boncore and Hans Krampe to name but a few The have all
failed my simple ethical stress tests long ago just like the two
wackos who have posted comments in here first.. In my humble opinion
the sneaky Yankee Muslim Kevin Barrett or his Jewish foe Mr. X
deserve each other just like their political heroes pals such as Irwin
Cotler and Stevey Boy Harper, Barack Obama and Georgey Boy Bush do..

In all sincerity I am curious if this comment will be published
and stand the test of time. You can bet dimes to dollars I will post
it within my blog about the Federal Court lawsuit. In fact i have
already done so

http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2016/07/i-am-curious-if-this-comment-posted.html

Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
902 800 0369

Holocaust deniers threaten Green Party credibility by Toronto Sun

Toronto Sun logo

Screen Shot 2016-08-03 at 7.10.27 AM

[***Editor’s Note: Graphics in article compliments of Radical Press]

Holocaust deniers threaten Green Party credibility

By Sue-Ann Levy, Toronto Sun
August 02, 2016

She was a member of the Green Party of Canada when it was founded in 1983 and ran in four elections as a party candidate.

Monika Schaefer, who stood for election provincially in 2004 and federally in 2006, 2008 and 2011, came to the party’s attention in mid-June when she posted a video on YouTube flatly denying the Holocaust.

According to the Jasper resident, who shot the video in Germany, the Holocaust is “the biggest and most pernicious lie in all of history” and there were “no gas chambers there (in Germany or elsewhere)… the only gas used was to get rid of lice.”

MonikaSchaeferSorryMomHdr copy

It appears the Green Party had egg on its face, not just because this woman was a candidate several times over, but because Green Party leader — and the party’s only sitting MP — Elizabeth May didn’t seem to know whether she was still a member, or not, when leading Canadian Jewish groups exposed Schaefer last month.

MayShocked

Reached in Jasper Tuesday, Schaefer said she rescinded her membership a year ago “on a matter of principle” — namely because May distanced herself from a petition seeking an investigation into the events of 9/11.

MonikaSchaeferPhoto

She accused May of “making political hay” out of her video — an affront considering she was a “loyal” Green Party member and candidate and shared her views “widely” with many Green Party members.

“She is bowing to her political masters … The Zionist lobby,” said Schaefer, whose candidacy was rejected in 2014.

Martin Sampson, spokesman for the Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs, says the Green Party is “particularly susceptible to infiltration” by Holocaust deniers and 9/11 Truthers.

CIJABomb copy 2

“In order to remain credible, the Green Party must stop people who hold these abhorrent views from hijacking the party, distracting it from its mission and relegating it to the margins,” he said.

No kidding.

One has to look no further than this weekend’s annual conference in Ottawa, where two controversial anti-Israel motions — and the only foreign policy positions to be presented at all — will be debated Saturday morning (on the Jewish Sabbath.)

1_boycott-israel-campaign_2006_50_70_amer-shomali-basel-nasr1 copy 2

Those controversial motions urge Green Party members to support the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement (which attempts to restrict ties and business with the Jewish state) and to approve revoking the charitable status of the Jewish National Fund of Canada (a charity that has worked to protect the natural environment of Israel for decades).

Online voting has been so supportive that the motions have made it to the convention’s workshop sessions, where they will be debated and voted on and then sent to full membership for a vote.

Michael Mostyn, CEO of B’nai Brith, says they believe members of the Independent Jewish Voices organization are pushing these Green Party motions — a group he says has spearheaded the anti-Israel boycott movement in Canada, have sent speakers to the highly “morally reprehensible” anti-Semitic Al Quds day rallies and “pretends” to speak for the majority of Jews in Canada, when in fact they do not.

CanadaBBLOBBY3 copy 5

Green Party spokesman Dan Palmer said May has previously indicated publicly that she opposes both motions and that she is just one vote at the convention.

“Policy proposals come from the grassroots of the party and are not vetted before being put to members,” he said Tuesday.

Mostyn said they certainly hope the anti-Israel motions do not pass this weekend and that the Green Party would not be associated with “views of this sort,” especially since the IJV organization have their paw prints all over them.

“You don’t want any political party motions that would single out groups for hatred,” he says.

He added that Schaefer’s video is “horrendous” and “extremely disturbing.”

—–

SLevy@postmedia.com

Source Article

Prime Minister announces new Supreme Court of Canada judicial appointments process from PMO office

Screen Shot 2014-01-29 at 9.59.07 AM copy

ATEDITOR0216

[Editor’s Note: A very interesting announcement. Will it result in the appointment of a more “diverse” group of SC Justices rather than a preponderance of Zionist/Jewish ones that currently populate those coveted seats? Only time will tell.]

——

Prime Minister announces new Supreme Court of Canada judicial appointments process
August 2, 2016
Ottawa, Ontario
Today, the Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau, announced a new process for appointing Supreme Court of Canada Justices that is open, transparent, and sets a higher standard for accountability.
Under the new process, an independent and non-partisan Advisory Board has been given the task of identifying suitable candidates who are jurists of the highest caliber, functionally bilingual, and representative of the diversity of our great country.
For the first time, any qualified Canadian lawyer or judge may apply for appointment to the Supreme Court of Canada through the Office of the Commissioner for Federal Judicial Affairs.
The seven-member Advisory Board, chaired by former Prime Minister Kim Campbell, includes four members nominated by independent professional organizations. The Advisory Board will review candidates who apply and will submit a shortlist of three to five individuals for consideration by the Prime Minister.
To enhance transparency, the assessment criteria guiding the Advisory Board, the questionnaire that all applicants must answer, and certain answers provided to the questionnaire by the Prime Minister’s eventual nominee, will all be made public.
The Minister of Justice and the chair of the Advisory Board will appear before Parliament to discuss the selection process. A number of Members of Parliament and Senators – from all parties – will also have the opportunity to take part in a Q&A session with the eventual nominee, before she or he is appointed to the Supreme Court of Canada.
Fundamentally, this process will demonstrate a degree of rigor and responsibility that Canadians expect from their government.
Quote
“The Supreme Court of Canada is respected nationally and internationally for its excellence—it is recognized as a model of a strong, independent judicial institution. This is due in no small part to a tradition of appointing only the most exceptional and impressive individuals to the court. We are committed to maintaining this tradition—and improving on it—by introducing an open, transparent and non-partisan process that will help ensure that the best, most well-qualified people reflective of Canadian society are named to Canada’s top court.”
– Rt. Hon. Justin Trudeau, Prime Minister of Canada
Quick Facts
•The following members have been named to the Independent Advisory Board for Supreme Court of Canada Judicial Appointments:
•  The Right Honourable Kim Campbell – Chairperson – former Prime Minister of Canada and Canadian Consul General, and currently the Founding Principal of the Peter Lougheed Leadership College at the University of Alberta
•  Camille Cameron – member – Dean of the Schulich School of Law at Dalhousie University, and Chair of the Canadian Council of Law Deans
•  Jeff Hirsch – member – President of the Federation of Law Societies of Canada, and partner with a Winnipeg law firm
•  Stephen Kakfwi – member – former Premier of the Northwest Territories and President of the Dene Nation, and currently working to improve the recognition and realities of Aboriginal peoples within Canada
•  Lili-Anna Pereša – member – President and Executive Director of Centraide of Greater Montreal
•  Richard J. Scott – member – former Chief Justice of the Manitoba Court of Appeal, and current counsel, arbitrator and mediator in a Winnipeg law firm
•  Susan Ursel – member – currently a senior partner with a Toronto firm, and Chair of the Canadian component of the African Legal Research Team which provides legal research support to Envisioning Global LGBT Rights
•The application period ends on Wednesday, August 24.
•Qualified lawyers and persons holding judicial office from across Canada who wish to be considered for the upcoming vacancy must complete and submit an application package no later than 23:59 Pacific daylight time on August24, 2016.
•Applications are now being accepted for the position that will become vacant in September with the retirement of the Honourable Justice Cromwell.
Related link
Associated links

 

Enough Already! HolocaustDeprogrammingCourse.com

EnjoughAlready!

HolocaustDeprogrammingCourse.com

Holocaust deprogramming course

Do you care to know about how the people you have trusted all your lives have lied to you?

If anything were to ever convince you of the terrible Jewish lies about World War II, this would be that document. You can’t possibly read this compilation of sources by hundreds of serious minded examiners and still believe the lies that mainstream accounts have forced upon you as “the truth” of World War II.

Many thanks to my friend “pdk” in France.
Please read as much as your mind can tolerate. You will never find as many courageous truth tellers represented in one place.
Best wishes,
John Kaminski

Recent GLARING Hypocrisy Interviews – Jim, Joe, Diane, Monika

GlaringH

 

GLARING Hypocrisy Roundtable: Holocaust Truthers Jim & Joe Rizoli, Diane King and Monika Schaefer

GLARING Hypocrisy Interview with Holocaust Truther Jim Rizoli
GLARING Hypocrisy Interview with Truth-Teller Monika Schaefer

 

 

BREAKING NEWS: Canada’s Terror Patsies, John Nuttall and Amanda Korody’s guilty verdict overturned by Judge

http://greencrowasthecrowflies.blogspot.com/2016/07/breaking-news-canadas-terror-patsies.html

Screen Shot 2016-07-30 at 9.52.04 AM

Screen Shot 2016-07-30 at 10.04.15 AM

Friday, July 29, 2016

BREAKING NEWS: Canada’s Terror Patsies, John Nuttall and Amanda Korody’s guilty verdict overturned by Judge

John Nuttall and Amanda Korody
after hearing verdict today
“The world has enough terrorists…we do not need the police to create more.”
BC Supreme Court Justice Catherine Bruce

In what Vancouver Sun reporter Ian Mulgrew describes as a stunning decision, the Judge in the Canadian Terror Patsies trial today ruled that the pair were entrapped by the RCMP. She overruled last year’s jury “guilty” decision and ruled that the police themselves broke the criminal code and if the guilty verdict were left to stand, it would obstruct justice. Well, that’s about as clear a verdict as can be stated by a judge. But it’s not good enough for the Crown and the police. They’re going to appeal. But looking at the verdict from their POV…what other choice do they have? If they don’t appeal, and win the appeal, the government’s going to get its @$$es sued off by the couple for entrapment, false charges and imprisonment.

Here is the CTV news report on the verdict and I will have some more comments to follow:

“VANCOUVER — A British Columbia couple found guilty of terrorism charges have had their verdicts tossed out in a scathing court decision that flays the RCMP for its “egregious” conduct in manipulating naive suspects into carrying out a police-manufactured crime.
B.C. Supreme Court Justice Catherine Bruce said the Mounties used trickery, deceit and veiled threats to engineer the terrorist acts for which John Nuttall and Amanda Korody were arrested on Canada Day three years ago.
The couple believed they were planting pressure-cooker bombs to kill and maim crowds gathered to celebrate at the B.C. legislature.
“The world has enough terrorists. We do not need the police to create more,” Bruce said in a landmark ruling Friday as she characterized the RCMP’s methods as “multi-faceted and systematic manipulation.”
“There is clearly a need to curtail the actions of police … to ensure that future undercover investigations do not follow the same path.”
Bruce said Mounties involved in a months-long sting launched in early 2013 knowingly exploited Nuttall and Korody’s vulnerabilities to induce them to commit an offence.
She described the pair as marginalized, socially isolated, former heroin addicts dependent on methadone and welfare to subsist and said they were “all talk and no action.”
Nuttall and Korody were recent converts to Islam. Their trial heard Nuttall say in a recording that he wanted to kill and maim countless people during Canada Day festivities in retaliation for Canada’s role in the mistreatment of Muslims in Afghanistan and other countries.
Without the heavy-handed involvement of undercover officers, it would have been impossible for Nuttall and Korody to articulate, craft and execute a terrorist bomb plot, Bruce said.
“Ultimately, their role in carrying out the plan was minuscule compared to what the police had to do,” Bruce said. “It was the police who were the leaders of the plot.”
She also condemned the behaviour of the primary undercover officer who, at the direction of the operation’s overseers, discouraged Nuttall and Korody from seeking outside spiritual guidance and convinced them he was a member of a powerful international terrorist group that would likely kill them if they failed to follow through.
“He was their leader and they were his disciples,” said Bruce, who stayed the proceedings, which threw out the convictions and allowed the couple to walk free after more than three years behind bars.

Screen Shot 2016-07-30 at 10.03.34 AM

They embraced outside B.C. Supreme Court before being temporarily re-arrested and later released from provincial court under a peace bond, which places them under strict conditions for up to a year.
A jury found the pair guilty in June 2015 of terrorism-related charges but Bruce delayed registering the convictions at the request of defence lawyers, who wanted to argue the Mounties had entrapped their clients.
The stay of proceedings means the charges won’t appear on any criminal record and can’t be used against the couple in the future. Had they been convicted, Nuttall and Korody could have faced a maximum sentence of life in prison.
Nuttall’s mother, Maureen Smith, was in court for the ruling and pumped her fist in the air when Bruce ordered a stay of proceedings.
Smith said she was ecstatic about the verdict but still furious at the RCMP.
“It makes me so angry that the cops did that to my son and Amanda,” she said. “The police were dirty crooks for committing these crimes against people, especially marginalized ones.”
Outside court, Crown lawyer Peter Eccles said he was disappointed by the decision and emphasized that the couple still pose a threat to the public.
“Let’s face it, they did do it,” Eccles said about Nuttall and Korody planting the inert explosives. “And they meant it.”
The Crown has filed an appeal of the ruling issued Friday.
Marilyn Sandford, Nuttall’s lawyer, referenced a section of the judge’s ruling, which described the RCMP’s perception of the risk posed by her client as “farcical.”
“We don’t criminalize thought in our country,” Sandford said. “We don’t criminalize crazy ideas. There are a lot of people with crazy ideas who are not inclined to act on them.”
Korody’s lawyer, Mark Jette, described the ruling as a “powerful indictment” against the RCMP and said the next step will be helping the couple re-integrate into society.
Jette rejected the suggestion that the public should be concerned about the ruling hamstringing police from investigating terrorism threats.
This is the first time in Canada that the legal defence of entrapment has been successfully argued in a terrorism case. Three previous attempts failed.”

Screen Shot 2016-07-30 at 10.03.21 AM

This is not over…as John Nuttall himself stated outside the courtroom after the verdict. He said he and Amanda Korody just want to go away and live their lives and have children. But he’s afraid to walk the streets of Canada…afraid the police will frame him again and/or take any children he and Amanda have. He says he can’t live in this country anymore.

I would say that John’s fears are well-founded. The police (and the police officers’ handlers…CSIS) cannot let this verdict stand. Not only will it bring lawsuits by the victimized couple for entrapment and imprisonment, etc…as I said before…but the RCMP and CSIS are in deep doo doo with the international cabal. They were supposed to get a conviction, which would serve as a precedent in the further corruption of the justice system in Canada….and lay the groundwork for more entrapment of vulnerable patsies and more terror plots/false flags for the international terror grist mill they’re setting up.

This Canadian legal precedent can be applied internationally and is a major setback for Terror Inc. The mistake the perpetrators of the entrapment scheme made was that they needed a corrupt judge to go along with the corrupt police officers and CSIS agents. The Canadian judicial system just isn’t far enough along in terms of corrupt judges….and hasn’t kept up with the corruption of the police departments.

And speaking of justice. Kudos to Supreme Court Justice Catherine Bruce…a true Canadian heroine if ever there was one! Hopefully she can now retire in peace. She saved the integrity of the Canadian judicial system…for now at least.

—-

Open Letter to Green Party Leader and Executives: Your ill-advised condemnation of Monika Schaefer of Jasper, Alberta by Al Romanchuk

From: “Al Romanchuk” <romanesq@shaw.ca>
AlRomanchukPic300
Subject: Your ill-advised condemnation of Monika Schaefer of Jasper, Alberta
Date: July 29, 2016
To: <Elizabeth.May@parl.gc.ca>, “Dan \(Green Party\) Palmer” <dan.palmer@greenparty.ca>, “Emily \(Green Party\) McMillan” <emily.mcmillan@greenparty.ca>
Sir & women,

I’m an 80 year old now living in Kelowna but I have been in politics since the age of 15. Growing up in Alberta was an honour and pleasure and practicing law in Alberta and BC gave me untold pleasurable moments. I’ve belonged to many political parties over the years but today they offer me nothing but corruption, secrecy and fraud served on a silver platter! I would just as soon abolish all political parties and the rebates that they receive from the federal government following a federal election or by-election. My indisputable rights to FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND OF THE PRESS have been eroded to the point where I no longer feel patriotic to my country. The federal government, and now BC and I’m sure other provinces will follow, has passed what I believe to be the EQUITY ACT granting special privileges and PROTECTIONS to all the GD queers and perverts in our society (especially the alphabet queers who don’t know whether they are male or female) but there is NOTHING in our laws PROTECTING ME FROM THESE KINDS OF HUMANOIDS!

Which brings me to the subject at hand. All of you have condemned PUBLICLY, in the harshest words possible, Miss Schaefer for publicizing her video regarding her QUESTIONING of the Jewish holocaust during WW2, where questioning in our country should be and was the essence of democracy. Your statements are ill-advised and it is obvious to anyone of native intelligence that none of you have done ANY research into the subject of the alleged holocaust. Like MOST Canadians, and others, you have fallen for the BIG LIE because you were taught that it was the truth. I am surprised at Miss May who, as a lawyer and so-called educated person, would not have done her research before castigating Miss Schaefer and I condemn you, Miss May, in the strongest possible terms. You have voiced your concerns in the past of not being included in certain debates citing that it was a matter of FREEDOM OF SPEECH and yet you malevolently condemn Miss Schaefer for simply EXERCISING HER RIGHT IN CANADA TO SUCH FREEDOM. The remarks of Palmer and McMillan against Miss Schaefer are entirely false and it is obvious that they have not done their homework as well.

As Miss May knows it is an essential element of jurisprudence that HE WHO ASSERTS THE POSITIVE HAS THE ONUS OF PROVING IT. The Jews have ASSERTED POSITIVELY THAT SINCE THE END OF WW2 THAT EXACTLY 6 MILLION JEWS WERE KILLED BY THE GERMANS IN THAT CAMPAIGN. But NO ONE from the Jewish community has come forward to present WRITTEN PROOF of such assertion and thus, over the years, it has been believed to be the truth when there is NO evidence thereof. I have written to two Jewish organizations, one in Ontario and one in Edmonton, and asked them the above simple question: PLEASE PROVIDE ME WITH WRITTEN PROOF OF YOUR ASSERTION THAT THE GERMANS KILLED EXACTLY 6 MILLION JEWS IN WW2. I have NO replies to date and the emails were sent about 2 weeks ago. One should remember, if I can jog your memories if you have them, that absolutely no written evidence of such mass killing was produced at the Nuremburg trials in 1945-46.

“If I was rich I would finance Miss Schaefer’s lawsuit against all of you for besmirching (libeling) her reputation and denying her right to earn a living. I cannot for the life of me see WHY Canadians would support your party given your totally unfounded, scurrilous and profoundly LYING statements about Miss Schaefer.”

So, where do YOU stand on the question, the vitally important question, of FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND OF THE PRESS? Do you or do you not believe that such freedoms INCLUDE the right to offend? Do you or do you not believe that people have a CHOICE on whether or not to listen to someone speak or read what someone has written? Your bitterly cold and deliberate attacks on Miss Schaefer for expressing her OWN OPINION are, to me, despicable and totally unwarranted having regard to the circumstances. If I was rich I would finance Miss Schaefer’s lawsuit against all of you for besmirching (libeling) her reputation and denying her right to earn a living. I cannot for the life of me see WHY Canadians would support your party given your totally unfounded, scurrilous and profoundly LYING statements about Miss Schaefer.

In this context I believe that all three of you should publish a public apology to Miss Schaefer. The apology should be couched in such terms that makes it abundantly clear that you did not mean to defame or otherwise condemn Miss Schaefer and that you sincerely believe that unfettered FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND OF THE PRESS SHOULD BE ALLOWED AND NEVER DENIED TO ANYONE IN CANADA. I would expect that such an apology would be published in the Jasper Fitzhugh, Edmonton Journal, Toronto Sun and Vancouver Sun within 15 days from the date of this email. The apology need not be lengthy but should be sincere. If you do NOT publish such an apology I can only presume that all of you DO NOT believe in these essential freedoms and that you have bought into the BIG LIE hook, line and sinker!

AL ROMANCHUK
Kelowna
Email: romanesq@shaw.ca

When You Write a Letter on Monika Schaefer’s Behalf

Letters4MonikaHdr

PLEASE ALSO CC IT TO THE MAYOR OF JASPER, ALBERTA & MONIKA & RADICALPRESS.COM

Mayor, Jasper, Alberta, Canada
Richard Ireland
Please also send Monika a copy as well:  
If you can please include a copy to Radical Press:
 
Again, this is her crime:  

Nova Scotia Court of Appeal rules in favour of Trinity Western University’s law program

TWU

News Release
Tuesday, July 26, 2016

Nova Scotia Court of Appeal rules in favour of Trinity Western University’s law program

 

HALIFAX: The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms (JCCF.ca) expressed its satisfaction with the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal decision released earlier today in Trinity Western University v. Nova Scotia Barristers’ Society. The Court of Appeal upheld the decision of the Supreme Court, which had ruled against the Barristers Society’s refusal to accredit Trinity Western University’s law school.

The law societies of B.C., Ontario and Nova Scotia have ruled against recognizing the law program of Trinity Western University (TWU), a private Evangelical Christian university in Langley, B.C. The Federation of Law Societies of Canada has approved the law program of TWU as meeting academic and professional standards. The Barristers’ Society does not allege that there is anything wrong with TWU’s law program, but claims that TWU’s Community Covenant discriminates against the LGBTQ+ community. The Community Covenant prohibits numerous legal activities such as vulgar or obscene language, drunkenness, viewing pornography, gossip, and sexual activity outside of the marriage of one man and one woman.

“The Charter is not a blueprint for moral conformity. Its purpose is to protect the citizen from the power of the state, not to enforce compliance by citizens or private institutions with the moral judgments of the state.”

The Justice Centre previously intervened in this case at the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia in December of 2014, to argue for the Charter section 2(d) right to freedom of association, including the right of every charity, ethnic and cultural association, sports club, temple, church, and political group to establish its own rules and membership requirements. On January 28, 2015, Justice James Campbell of the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia ruled against the Barristers’ Society, stating that “The Charter is not a blueprint for moral conformity. Its purpose is to protect the citizen from the power of the state, not to enforce compliance by citizens or private institutions with the moral judgments of the state.”

“The court’s decision is a victory for freedom of association, freedom of conscience and religion, and freedom of expression,” said Justice Centre president John Carpay. “All Canadians must be free to peacefully associate with one another under common beliefs and values, without punishment, and this court today upheld those freedoms.”

For more information, contact:

John Carpay, president, Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms:
403-619-8014 or jcarpay@jccf.ca

Jay Cameron, staff lawyer, Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms
403-909-3404 or jcameron@jccf.ca

Read Court Documents and Case Background

Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms
#253, 7620 Elbow Drive SW Calgary, Alberta, T2V 1K2

JCCF.ca

“Defending the constitutional freedoms of Canadians”

Elizabeth May, Monika Schaefer, and the Betrayal of Canada by Prof. Tony Hall

GREENWASH!

Elizabeth May, Monika Schaefer, and the Betrayal of Canada

by
Prof. Tony Hall

The crass opportunism of the Green Party of Canada’s leadership, including Elizabeth May, is on full display in its rush to slander Monika Schaefer.  The slander came in response to Ms. Schaefer’s You Tube video entitled “Sorry Mom, I Was Wrong About the Holocaust.

The Green Party has made a serious mistake in its haste to expel Ms. Schaefer after she has already resigned from the organization on July 30, 2015 based on reasons of high principle. As I understand it, Ms. Schaefer resigned because she sees Ms. May as a full participant in the ongoing criminal cover up of what actually transpired on 9/11. The effect of the Green Party’s involvement in this criminal cover up is to protect the guilty parties responsible for this most consequential and ongoing crime against humanity. John Duddy has made similar points to Ms. May repeatedly I believe.

“All Canada’s parliamentarians and all our federal political parties are complicit in torture by virtue of accepting the 9/11 Commission Report as the basis for the making of federal enactments on terror threats in Canada.”

MayShocked

As I see it Ms. May’s rejections of the information on 9/11 brought to her by Ms. Schaefer amounts to the Green Party Leader’s acceptance that it is OK to make Canadian public policy on terrorism based on tainted evidence obtained through illegal torture in the United States. That is the implication of Ms. May’s uncritical acceptance of the conclusions reached in 2004 by the 9/11 Commission in the United States. All Canada’s parliamentarians and all our federal political parties are complicit in torture by virtue of accepting the 9/11 Commission Report as the basis for the making of federal enactments on terror threats in Canada. I won’t go into the sorry details of the Paul Estrin affair that also caused Ms. Schaefer to lose confidence in the Green Party’s leadership.

“Is Ms. Schaefer a more authentic embodiment of honest and unwavering Green environmentalism than Ms. May? To my way of thinking the answer is clear given the mounting evidence that Ms. May is no friend of free speech, open debate and even rudimentary honesty in the hoax that now passes for Canadian parliamentary democracy.”

I share Ms. Schaefer’s disappointment that Ms. May has failed when it counts most to live up to her past promises that she would speak truth to power even on difficult issues. Have Greens become grey when it comes to confronting the big issues of war and peace, life and death? Is Ms. Schaefer a more authentic embodiment of honest and unwavering Green environmentalism than Ms. May? To my way of thinking the answer is clear given the mounting evidence that Ms. May is no friend of free speech, open debate and even rudimentary honesty in the hoax that now passes for Canadian parliamentary democracy.

Ms. Schaefer’s involvement with the Green Party goes back to her attendance at the founding convention in 1983. She has proven herself especially in recent years to be much more true than Ms. May to the originating ideals of the Green Party.

MonikaSchaeferPhoto

Unfortunately the party that Ms. Schaefer helped to found and build has now been subjugated to some very powerful interests, the same interests that seem intent on criminalizing Jasper’s most celebrated violinist for honestly articulating her beliefs. How tragic to see Ms. May in the role of media cop feeding slanderous vilifications of Ms. Schaefer to the Ottawa press corpse that has become little more than a stenographer for official sources. Very little of substance gets investigated by mainstream Canadian journalists with the result that the authoritarianism of Police State Canada keeps getting ramped up as is now becoming very clear by the treatment heaped on Ms. Schaefer especially in Jasper and Ottawa.

The interests Ms. May is representing in her federal slander of Ms. Schaefer are the same interests that are demonstrably sabotaging the promise of Canada as a sovereign place of freedom, self-determination, decency, and justice, as a place devoted to peace and environmental sanity. The Green Party still has it in its power to do the right thing and correct its horrendous mistake with an apology to Ms. Schaefer for misrepresenting her actual relationship with the political organization Monika worked so diligently to help build up. Given what I know of the history of Monika’s helpful support of Ms. May’s quest for power in not-so-distant times, it seems to me some thanks are in order for Ms. Schaefer’s many contributions to the Green Party of Canada.

What will the Green Party do to correct its announcement that it will expel an individual who already resigned from Ms. May’s party based on reasons of high principle? Will the Green Party of Canada publish Monika Schaefer’s letter of resignation dated July 30, 2015? An excerpt from the letter has already been published in the American Herald Tribune.

Escape From The Holocaust Lie by Arthur Topham

EscapeHoloHdr

Escape From The Holocaust Lie

By
Arthur Topham

“The first and most important value is the freedom to debate, the freedom to think, the freedom to speak and the freedom to disagree. This prosecution, has already had a very serious effect on those freedoms. If it were to result in a conviction, I suggest to you that a process of witch-hunting would begin in our society where everyone who had a grievance against anyone else would say “Uh-huh, you are false, and I’ll take you or pressure somebody else to take you to court and force you to defend yourself.”
~ Douglas Christie, Barrister & Solicitor from his Summation to the Jury
in the Ernst Zundel Trial, February 25, 1985

I chose the above quote from Douglas Christie, the greatest defender of freedom of speech Canada has ever produced. Doug, more than any other person I know (and I knew him personally for seven years right up to the time of his death in March of 2013), epitomized the spirit of Truth, intelligence of Heart, the noble Grace and indefatigable Courage and Integrity of a free man all combined with an adamantine faith in God.

DouglasHChristiecopy_zps43b1b5c0

It was due in great part to the efforts of Doug Christie during the trial of Ernst Zundel that he, like the biblical Moses of old, was able to lead the captured consciousness of Truth Seekers of the 20th Century out of their mentally-induced prisons into the fertile lands of freedom of speech and expression.

tazebook_dees-1-copy

Ernst Zundel had been charged under Section 177 of the Criminal Code for having knowingly “published false news that was likely to be injurious to the public good” when he began dispensing a small booklet titled Did Six Million Really Die? – one which he hadn’t written himself but felt expressed his views on the alleged Jewish Holocaust. It was Zundel’s trial that finally brought to a head the (then) forty years of Canadians wondering aimlessly through a cognitive “6 Million” wilderness of deception not knowing that all the while they were being psychically manipulated and conditioned to believe the greatest LIE ever told to humanity.

Awhile ago I typed out and digitally recorded on RadicalPress.com Doug Christie’s Summation to the Jury which first appeared in booklet form not too long after the trial ended and I highly recommend that anyone in the least concerned about this massive experiment in mind control read it. If nothing else it will vividly show you the brilliance and logic (and levity) of the lawyer who honestly earned his handle “The Battling Barrister”.

ZundelTrialFreeSpeechDC800 copy

Doug Christie put the issue of Ernst Zundel’s concerns before the jury in the following manner:

“The booklet Did Six Million Really Die? is more important for German people than it is maybe for others, because there is a real guilt daily inculcated against German people in the media every time they look at the war.

The German people have been portrayed for forty years in the role of the butchers of six million.”

In Christie’s Summation to the Jury at the culmination of the trial he recapped much of what was revealed to the court through weeks of mind-bending cross-examination, regarding this one fundamental LIE that has superseded all other interpretations of what took place during WW 2 in German occupied territories in Eastern Europe.

During the Zundel Trial Christie literally demolished the illusions of the “gas chambers” and the “6 Million Jews” myth that the Crown and its Expert Witness Raul Hilberg had attempted to foist upon the Jury and, by extension, the nation and the world as a whole. The final results showed that the much-touted, world renowned “holocaust expert” Raul Hilberg’s testimony (the Jews considered Hilberg to be their No. 1 man) ultimately proved to be nothing more than unsubstantiated bluff.

As Doug Christie put it in his summation:

“Who denies Dr. Hilberg the right to publish his views? Who denies that he should be free to say there was a Hitler order to exterminate Jews? Not my client; not me; nobody in society denies him that right. Who denies anyone the right to publish their views? Well, it’s the position of my client that he’s obliged to justify his publication. And I suggest he has….”

“Has Dr. Hilberg proved a single thing here to be false? No, he hasn’t. He says he had documents. He produces none. He talks about the train tickets and schedules. What train tickets and schedules? If we’re talking about a criminal case we should have evidence. There isn’t enough evidence here today to convict one person for murdering one other person. But they want you to believe that six million died, or millions died, and that this question mark is false. Where is the evidence to support one murder by one person? There is no Hitler order; there is an alleged order somewhere by somebody alleged to have heard it from somebody else. There’s no evidence.”

RaulHilbergPic

And the Beat(ing) Goes On

Now, seventy-one years later (thirty-one years after Doug’s summation) we’re still witnessing the relentless, malicious efforts of the Zionist Jews (and their sycophant zombie clones) to brow-beat, bludgeon, bedazzle and intimidate Canadians into accepting as FACT everything that the Ernst Zundel trial legally established as mere FICTION.

I am specifically referring to the current mainstream media uproar of feigned sound and fury that’s overtaken not only the local media in Jasper, Alberta The Jasper Local, and the Canadian Edmonton, Alberta media but has even extended itself to the state of Israel’s Haaretz newspaper since one of Jasper’s better known residents and peace activists, Monika Schaefer, published a short video denouncing the alleged “6 Million Jewish Holocaust”. The video in question was titled, Sorry Mom, I was wrong about the Holocaust.

MonikaSchaeferSorryMomHdr copy

No ifs ands or buts, it’s intentional mind-control on the same level as that of MKULTRA.

No ifs and or buts, it’s intentional mind-control on the same level as that of MKULTRA. Canadians, like people everywhere, have been unwittingly under the hypnotic, sorcerer’s spell of Jewish controlled “mainstream media” since the end of World War 2. They have surreptitiously endured a lifetime of brainwashing and mendaciously motivated mind control and for many today they still have little or no clue that the alleged “6 Million Jewish Holocaust” was and is the BIGGEST and most pervasive LIE ever foisted upon the world.

Of course that’s how it was intentionally designed to be when the perpetrators of this fantastic fiction first formulated, then forecast for use on such a massive scale, their serpentine “6 Million” siren song purposely meant to entrap the masses into subconsciously entering a Zionist-induced cognitive gulag or concentration camp strikingly similar to their own Talmudic Rabbi’s historically induced ghetto consciousness that forms the superstructure upon which Zionism’s atheistic ideological edifice rests.

Back in 2009 I wrote an article titled Israel’s Wall: For Palestinians or Jews? where I try to show the similitude between the wall that the Israeli government constructed on stolen Palestinian land and the mental/emotional wall that the Talmudic Rabbis built around their own tribe in order to control the minds of each successive generation of Jews and keep them trapped in the Talmudic oral “law”; an alleged law that purported made them especially chosen by God to rule over the world and because of that exclusiveness therefore separate and a step above the rest of humanity. It was a thesis first put forward by the British author and journalist Douglas Reed in his monumental classic, The Controversy of Zion.

The final point thought that needs to be restated again and again is the fact that down through history and right up until the 20th Century the most astute observers of civilized development in the West continually questioned and criticized the actions and motives of the Babylonian Talmudic tribe of Pharisees whenever they began to meddle too deeply in the affairs of other nation states but beginning with the take-over of the majority of the media in the West around the turn of the 20th century this practise began to cease and in its place there began renewed efforts on the part of the Zionist Jews to attack any and all critics of their ideology and their actions with the endless epithets of “anti-Semite” and “racist” and “Jew Hater”, an enterprise that has today reached such epidemic proportions that critics of present day Zionism lay wasting away in dungeons and website owners, university professors, researchers and writers everywhere are being accused of “hate crimes” throughout most, if not all, western nations.

Monika Schaefer’s case is the latest in that long and disgusting list of Truth Revealers who Jewish lobby organizations like B’nai Brith Canada and the new viper on the holohoax block The Centre for Israel & Jewish Affairs (CIJA) along with all their trance-induced toady followers are attempting to smear and degrade and destroy in order to keep the BIG LIE from being questioned.

CanadaBBLOBBY3 copy 5

What to do?

The longer this travesty of injustice goes on the more insanely vile and blood-thirsty the Zionists are becoming. Their desperation has grown almost exponentially over the past decade as they wend their way through the corridors of Canada’s justice system plying their rag-tag “hate crime” laws in order to safeguard the collusion they’ve made with the Devil.

No better example of just how demented it’s becoming was the latest attack upon Monika Schaefer that occurred but a day or so ago in Jasper. When Monika Schaefer moved to Jasper, Alberta busking (i.e. the playing of an instrument on the public streets) was illegal. Bearing that in mind, in communication with Monika over this matter  she told me the following:

“The irony of the fact is that it was me who brought the issue of busking to town council already a few years ago, made a presentation (at least on one occasion, and have raised it a few times since…) to support busking in town. You see, it has always been illegal to busk in Jasper. Yes, you read correctly Arthur. Anyway, so you see the irony – I have been pushing for busking for a long time. This summer is the first time it is legal. So when I went yesterday to get my busking license, my senses already went up. Dave wasn’t there, but the woman who was there (whom I have also known for decades – it’s a small town) was behaving very cagy. Then I left a phone message, text message, and email message with the person who was supposedly in charge (someone else, not even Dave). Today my gut feeling of yesterday was proven correct when I received Dave’s message.”

And here’s the rub for those who haven’t read the article. Dave’s message read: “We have considered your application for a busking permit in Jasper. In light of your recently publicly proclaimed non-inclusive beliefs we have decided to decline a permit to you at this time.”

“publicly proclaimed non-inclusive beliefs” !!!???

As one commenter on RadicalPress. com wrote in reply to the article, Surely you guys are making this up! because no one can possibly be dumb enough to actually write and publish that sentence – NOT, in Canada, no f’n way!”

Unfortunately for Canada someone in an official position with the municipal government of Jasper, Alberta DID write that sentence and sent it to Monika Schaefer.

Since my own arrest, incarceration and criminal case began back in May of 2012 after I was charged with “communicating statements” that did “willfully promote hatred against an identifiable group, people of the Jewish religion or ethnic origin, contrary to Section 319(2) of the Criminal Code” I’ve been doing my damnedest to warn Canadians of the extreme danger of these so-called “Hate Propaganda” laws that the Zionist Jew lobbyists created and are using with increasing fervour and zeal to censor any and all criticism of their deeds both here at home and abroad in the state of Israel. And of course the kicker is the fact that they used the “6 Million” holocaust lie in order to justify the inclusion of these Orwellian anti-free speech laws into Canadian jurisprudence.

Given the current Prime Minister of Canada, Justin Trudeau’s, longstanding indoctrination on the holocaust deception and his unabashed public display of obeisance to the perpetrators of this hoax there’s little chance that we will see him do what Conservative PM Stephen Harper did with the equally nefarious Sec. 13(1) legislation formerly contained in the Canadian Human Rights Act; that is, repeal the law. But that is the only and final solution to this “hate speech” madness that’s slithered like a snake from out of that den of vipers known as the Canadian “Jewish Lobby”.

RepealHateLaws-1000 copy 2

The issue must be taken from Cybespace’s Facebook and the Alternative media and transposed down onto the streets and turned into a public spectacle that the mainstream media cannot refuse to cover. Instead of focussing their attention on Gay Pride festivities it’s time that the Jewish-controlled media was forced to recognize that the fundamental rights of ALL Canadians are being jeopardized by these draconian “hate speech” laws and the only way this is going to happen is if normal, law-abiding citizens of Canada get their act together and begin to openly PROTEST this blatant act of sedition by these foreign lobbyists against Canadians’ lawful right to freedom of expression both on and off the Internet.

The time to organize this is NOW. Their game plan is so in our face obvious and the people know it. All that remains is for concerned Canadians to stand up, take to the streets and say ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!

If we want our basic freedoms we’re going to have to fight to hang on to them one way or another.

______

For Whites Sensing Decline, Donald Trump Unleashes Words of Resistance from New York Times

For Whites Sensing Decline, Donald Trump Unleashes Words of Resistance

By NICHOLAS CONFESSORE

JULY 13, 2016

Screen Shot 2016-07-24 at 6.30.52 PM

A Donald J. Trump rally last week in Raleigh, N.C. Mr. Trump is voicing the bewilderment and anger of whites who do not feel at all powerful or privileged.

Credit: Stephen Crowley/The New York Times

The chant erupts in a college auditorium in Washington, as admirers of a conservative internet personality shout down a black protester. It echoes around the gym of a central Iowa high school, as white students taunt the Hispanic fans and players of a rival team. It is hollered by a lone motorcyclist, as he tears out of a Kansas gas station after an argument with a Hispanic man and his Muslim friend.

Trump

Trump

Trump

In countless collisions of color and creed, Donald J. Trump’s name evokes an easily understood message of racial hostility. Defying modern conventions of political civility and language, Mr. Trump has breached the boundaries that have long constrained Americans’ public discussion of race.

Mr. Trump has attacked Mexicans as criminals. He has called for a ban on Muslim immigrants. He has wondered aloud why the United States is not “letting people in from Europe.”

His rallies vibrate with grievances that might otherwise be expressed in private: about “political correctness,” about the ranch house down the street overcrowded with day laborers, and about who is really to blame for the death of a black teenager in Ferguson, Mo. In a country where the wealthiest and most influential citizens are still mostly white, Mr. Trump is voicing the bewilderment and anger of whites who do not feel at all powerful or privileged.

But in doing so, Mr. Trump has also opened the door to assertions of white identity and resentment in a way not seen so broadly in American culture in over half a century, according to those who track patterns of racial tension and antagonism in American life.

Dozens of interviews — with ardent Trump supporters and curious students, avowed white nationalists, and scholars who study the interplay of race and rhetoric — suggest that the passions aroused and channeled by Mr. Trump take many forms, from earnest if muddled rebellion to deeper and more elaborate bigotry.

On campuses clenched by unforgiving debates over language and inclusion, some students embrace Mr. Trump as a way of rebelling against the intricate rules surrounding privilege and microaggression, and provoking the keepers of those rules.

Among older whites unsettled by new Spanish-speaking neighbors, or suspicious of the faith claimed by their country’s most bitter enemies, his name is a call to arms.

On the internet, Mr. Trump is invoked by anonymous followers brandishing stark expressions of hate and anti-Semitism, surprisingly amplified this month when Mr. Trump tweeted a graphic depicting Hillary Clinton’s face with piles of cash and a six-pointed star that many viewed as a Star of David.

“I think what we really find troubling is the mainstreaming of these really offensive ideas,” said Jonathan Greenblatt, the national director of the Anti-Defamation League, which tracks hate groups. “It’s allowed some of the worst ideas into the public conversation in ways we haven’t seen anything like in recent memory.”

Mr. Trump declined to be interviewed for this article, and his spokesman declined to comment.

Outside a former aircraft factory in Bethpage, N.Y., not far from a strip of halal butchers and Indian restaurants now known as Little India, a Long Island housewife who gave her name as Kathy Reb finished a cigarette on a spring evening. Nervously, she explained how she had watched the complexion of her suburb outside New York City change. “Everyone’s sticking together in their groups,” she said, “so white people have to, too.”

The resentment among whites feels both old and distinctly of this moment. It is shaped by the reality of demographic change, by a decade and a half of war in the Middle East, and by unease with the newly confident and confrontational activism of young blacks furious over police violence. It is mingled with patriotism, pride, fear and a sense that an America without them at its center is not really America anymore.

In the months since Mr. Trump began his campaign, the percentage of Americans who say race relations are worsening has increased, reaching nearly half in an April poll by CBS News. The sharpest rise was among Republicans: Sixty percent said race relations were getting worse.

And Mr. Trump’s rise is shifting the country’s racial discourse just as the millennial generation comes fully of age, more and more distant from the horrors of the Holocaust, or the government-sanctioned racism of Jim Crow.

Some are elated by the turn. In making the explicit assertion of white identity and grievance more widespread, Mr. Trump has galvanized the otherwise marginal world of avowed white nationalists and self-described “race realists.” They hail him as a fellow traveler who has driven millions of white Americans toward an intuitive embrace of their ideals: that race should matter as much to white people as it does to everyone else. He has freed Americans, those activists say, to say what they really believe.

“The discussion that white Americans never want to have is this question of identity — who are we?” said Richard Spencer, 38, a writer and an activist whose Montana-based nonprofit is dedicated to “the heritage, identity and future of people of European descent” in the United States. “He is bringing identity politics for white people into the public sphere in a way no one has.”

Immigration Fears

Another Republican once sounded alarms about globalization, unchecked immigration and the looming obsolescence of European-American culture. But in two bids for the Republican nomination, that candidate, Patrick J. Buchanan, won a total of four states. Mr. Trump won 37.

Mr. Buchanan’s 1992 and 1996 campaigns were dismissed as a political and intellectual dead end for Republicans.

“I said, ‘Look, we’re the white party,’” Mr. Buchanan said in an interview from his Virginia home, recalling his attacks on multiculturalism and non-European immigration. “‘If this continues, we’re going the way of the Whigs.’ Everyone said, ‘That’s a terrible thing to say.’”

Mr. Buchanan was campaigning against a backdrop of overwhelming white political and cultural dominance in America. But in the years that followed, the number of immigrants living in the United States illegally would double and then triple, before leveling off under the Obama administration around 11 million. Deindustrialization, driven in part by global trade, would devastate the economic fortunes of white men accustomed to making a decent living without a college degree.

Screen Shot 2016-07-24 at 6.31.22 PM

Patrick J. Buchanan in 1995.

Credit: Stephen Crowley/The New York Times

Demographers began to speak of a not-too-distant future when non-Hispanic whites would be a minority of the American population. In states like Texas and California, and in hundreds of cities and counties around the country, that future has arrived.

“It is the changes that are taking place that have created the national constituency for Donald Trump,” Mr. Buchanan said.

For many Americans, President Obama’s election, made possible in part by the rising strength of nonwhite voters, signaled a transcendent moment in the country’s knotty racial history. But for some whites, the election of the country’s first black president was also a powerful symbol of their declining pre-eminence in American society.

Work by Michael I. Norton, a professor at Harvard Business School, suggests that whites have come to see anti-white bias as more prevalent than anti-black bias, and that they think further black progress is coming at their expense. On talk radio and Fox News, complaints about bigotry are routinely dismissed as a mere hustle — blacks “playing the race card” or being racist themselves. And during Mr. Obama’s presidency, whites have increasingly seen his policies as freighted with preference toward blacks, according to data collected by Michael Tesler, a political scientist at the University of California, Irvine.

Mr. Tesler used polling questions about the causes and depth of racial inequality — such as whether blacks suffer greater poverty because of discrimination or lack of effort — to classify people as either “racial conservatives” or “racial liberals.” During Mr. Obama’s two terms, Mr. Tesler found, racial liberals accelerated their migration to the Democratic Party. As the 2016 campaign began, the Republican Party was not just the party of most white voters. It was also, to use Mr. Tesler’s phrase, the party of racial conservatism.

Few politicians were better prepared than Mr. Trump to harness these shifts. While open racism against blacks remains among the most powerful taboos in American politics, Americans feel more free expressing worries about illegal immigrants and dislike of Islam, survey research shows. In Mr. Trump’s hands, the two ideas merged: During Mr. Obama’s presidency, he has become America’s most prominent “birther,” loudly questioning Mr. Obama’s American citizenship and suggesting he could be Muslim.

When Mr. Obama ran for re-election, few Americans said they disapproved of him because of his race. But they were comfortable citing his supposed religion. In 2012, according to surveys conducted for the Cooperative Congressional Election Study, a majority of Mitt Romney’s voters said Mr. Obama’s religion made them less likely to vote for him. Almost all of these voters believed he was not Christian, an opinion that closely correlated with conservative racial attitudes found in Mr. Tesler’s research.

Mr. Trump “is speaking an anti-other message — that Obama’s foreign, which is mixed in with being black, and perceptions that he is Muslim,” Mr. Tesler said. “It is a catchall for expressing ethnocentric opposition to Obama, without saying you’re against him because he’s black.”

A Vague Refrain: ‘I Disavow’

In June 2015, two weeks after Mr. Trump entered the presidential race, he received an endorsement that would end most campaigns: The Daily Stormer embraced his candidacy.

Founded in 2013 by a neo-Nazi named Andrew Anglin, The Daily Stormer is among the most prominent online gathering places for white nationalists and anti-Semites, with sections devoted to “The Jewish Problem” and “Race War.” Mr. Anglin, 31, explained that although he had some disagreements with him, Mr. Trump was the only candidate willing to speak the truth about Mexicans.

“Trump is willing to say what most Americans think: It’s time to deport these people,” Mr. Anglin wrote. “He is also willing to call them out as criminal rapists, murderers and drug dealers.”

Mr. Trump’s campaign electrified the world of white nationalists. They had long been absent from mainstream politics, taking refuge at obscure conferences and in largely anonymous havens online. Most believed that the Republican Party had been subverted and captured by liberal racial dictums.

Many in this new generation of nationalists shun the trappings of old-fashioned white supremacy, appropriating the language of multiculturalism to recast themselves as white analogues to La Raza and other civil rights organizations. They call themselves “race realists” or “identitarians” — conservatives for whom racial heritage is more important than ideology.

But across this spectrum, in Mr. Trump’s descriptions of immigrants as vectors of disease, violent crime and social decay, they heard their own dialect.

Mr. Spencer, a popular figure in the white nationalist world, said he did not believe that Mr. Trump subscribed to his entire worldview. But he was struck that Mr. Trump seemed to understand and echo many of his group’s ideas intuitively, and take them to a broader audience.

“I don’t think he has thought through this issue in a way that I and a number of people have,” Mr. Spencer said. “I think he is reacting to the feeling that he has lost his country.”

Screen Shot 2016-07-24 at 6.16.48 PM

Richard Spencer, a white nationalist in Montana, said Mr. Trump was “bringing identity politics for white people into the public sphere in a way no one has.”

Credit: Tim Goessman for The New York Times

This year, for the first time in decades, overt white nationalism re-entered national politics. In Iowa, a new “super PAC” paid for pro-Trump robocalls featuring Jared Taylor, a self-described race realist, and William Johnson, a white nationalist and the chairman of the American Freedom Party. (“We don’t need Muslims,” Mr. Taylor urged recipients of the calls. “We need smart, well-educated white people who will assimilate to our culture. Vote Trump.”) David Duke, the Louisiana lawmaker turned anti-Semitic radio host, encouraged listeners to vote for Mr. Trump.

Modern political convention dictates that candidates receiving such embraces instantly and publicly spurn them. In 2008, when it was revealed that a minister who endorsed the Republican nominee, Senator John McCain, had made anti-Semitic and anti-Muslim remarks, Mr. McCain forcefully repudiated them.

Mr. Trump did something different.

Asked about the robocall, Mr. Trump seemed to sympathize with its message while affecting a vague half-distance. “Nothing in this country shocks me; I would disavow it, but nothing in this country shocks me,” Mr. Trump told a CNN anchor. “People are angry.”

Pressed, Mr. Trump grew irritable, saying: “How many times you want me to say it? I said, ‘I disavow.’”

Asked six weeks later about Mr. Duke’s support, he said he had been unaware of it: “David Duke endorsed me? O.K. All right. I disavow, O.K.?” Later, on Twitter, he repeated the phrase: “I disavow.”

Mr. Trump has often used those words when confronted by reporters. The phrase is comfortingly nonspecific, a disavowal of everything and nothing. And whatever Mr. Trump’s intentions, it has been powerfully reassuring to people on the far right.

“There’s no direct object there,” Mr. Spencer said. “It’s kind of interesting, isn’t it?”

Mr. Trump’s new supporters took his approach as a signal of support. In an interview on a “pro-white” radio show called “The Political Cesspool,” Mr. Johnson, of the American Freedom Party, praised Mr. Trump’s handling of the controversy.

“He disavowed us,” Mr. Johnson acknowledged, “but he explained why there is so much anger in America that I couldn’t have asked for a better approach from him.”

Mr. Taylor, who has written that blacks “left entirely to their own devices” are incapable of civilization, and whose magazine, American Renaissance, once published an essay arguing that blacks were genetically more prone to crime, wrote on his blog that Mr. Trump had handled the attacks on him “in the nicest way.”

Like others in his world, Mr. Taylor does not know if Mr. Trump agrees with him on everything. In an interview, he suggested that it did not really matter, and that Mr. Trump was expressing the discomfort many white people felt about other races.

“Ordinary white people don’t want the neighborhood to turn Mexican,” Mr. Taylor said, adding, “They just realize that large numbers of Mexicans will change the neighborhood in ways they don’t like.”

Screen Shot 2016-07-24 at 6.19.41 PM

Jared Taylor, a self-described race realist, made robocalls urging Iowa voters to support Mr. Trump.

Credit:Justin T. Gellerson for The New York Times

At a Trump rally last month in Richmond, Va., as at most Trump rallies, the audience was mostly white men. They strolled by police barricades in work boots or pressed khakis, grinning at a ragtag assortment of protesters nearby. In interviews, they complained about the Mexican flags brandished outside Trump events and wondered why the government was paying to fix up Section 8 houses for people with late-model iPhones. They recounted Hispanic co-workers mocking them.

“They’ll tell you straight to your face, ‘This is our country now — no more gringos!’” said Nick Conrad, a sheet metal worker who wore a “Hillary Clinton for Prison” T-shirt and wraparound sunglasses. “They’re not in it for our culture. They’re not here to assimilate.”

Mr. Conrad shrugged.

“He says what everyone thinks,” Mr. Conrad said of Mr. Trump. “He says what we’re all thinking. He’s bringing people together. We say, ‘Hey, that’s right; we can say this.’”

Retweets and Repercussions

Mr. Trump dismisses those who accuse him of embracing or enabling racism. “I’m the least racist person,” he declared in December in an interview with CNN.

But on the flatlands of social media, the border between Mr. Trump and white supremacists easily blurs. He has retweeted supportive messages from racist or nationalist Twitter accounts to his nine million followers. Last fall, he retweeted a graphic with fictitious crime statistics claiming that 81 percent of white homicide victims in 2015 were killed by blacks. (No such statistic was available for 2015 at the time; the actual figure for 2014 was 15 percent, according to the F.B.I.)

In January and February he retweeted messages from a user with the handle @WhiteGenocideTM, whose profile picture is of George Lincoln Rockwell, the founder of the American Nazi Party. A couple of days later, in quick succession, he retweeted two more accounts featuring white nationalist or Nazi themes. Mr. Trump deleted one of the retweets, but white supremacists saw more than a twitch of the thumb. “Our Glorious Leader and ULTIMATE SAVIOR has gone full wink-wink-wink to his most aggressive supporters,” Mr. Anglin wrote on The Daily Stormer.

In fact, Mr. Trump’s Twitter presence is tightly interwoven with hordes of mostly anonymous accounts trafficking in racist and anti-Semitic attacks. When Little Bird, a social media data mining company, analyzed a week of Mr. Trump’s Twitter activity, it found that almost 30 percent of the accounts Mr. Trump retweeted in turn followed one or more of 50 popular self-identified white nationalist accounts.

At times, a circular current seems to flow between white nationalists and Mr. Trump on Twitter. Criticized for his recent message about Mrs. Clinton, Mr. Trump insisted that no allusion to Jews was intended and denounced reporters for drawing the connection. Mr. Trump’s social media director said in a statement that he had “lifted” the image from an anti-Clinton Twitter feed where “countless images appear.” Among them, it turned out, was a series of photos of Mrs. Clinton’s head arranged in the shape of a swastika.

The original image was later traced by Mic, an online magazine aimed at younger readers, to the politics section of 8chan, a message board ridden with anti-Semitic memes and racist images. There and on other message boards, such as 4chan and Reddit, Mr. Trump’s attacks on political correctness and illegal immigration resonate with a broader audience. Some claim membership in the “alt-right,” a loose and contested term that can encompass white nationalists, anti-immigration conservatives and anonymous trolls whose taunts are laced with GIFs and obscure internet slang.

Screen Shot 2016-07-24 at 6.23.34 PM

Mr. Trump has denied accusations that a graphic he posted this month on Twitter contained anti-Semitic imagery.

After Mr. Trump attacked a profile of his wife, Melania, in GQ, the article’s author, the journalist Julia Ioffe, who is Jewish, was inundated with anti-Semitic abuse on social media, including a cartoon depicting Ms. Ioffe in a concentration camp.

Asked whether he condemned the attacks, Mr. Trump told an interviewer: “I don’t have a message to the fans. A woman wrote an article that’s inaccurate.”

Resonating on Campuses

Mr. Trump’s influence is playing out perhaps most vividly on college campuses, an otherwise deeply liberal redoubt where young people grapple openly and frenetically with their own race and identity.

For a generation weaned on a diet of civic multiculturalism, supporting Mr. Trump breaks the ultimate taboo. Students writing Mr. Trump’s name and slogans in chalk have been accused of hate crimes and spurred calls for censorship. And on campuses frozen by unyielding political correctness and expanding definitions of impermissible speech, some welcome the provocation that Mr. Trump provides.

Three days after a gunman claiming allegiance to the Islamic State killed 49 people in a gay club in Orlando, Fla., a crowd of college students gathered two blocks from the site of the massacre. They wore Trump hats or T-shirts and chanted, “Build that wall.” They cracked jokes about trigger warnings or whether the sidewalk counted as a safe space.

A few minutes later, a black S.U.V. pulled up, delivering Milo Yiannopoulos, a 30-something gay conservative raised in London and now a minor celebrity among the alt-right.

Since 2014, Mr. Yiannopoulos has toured college campuses in the United States and England, staging a performance that is equal parts spectacle and stump speech. Mr. Yiannopoulos dismisses statistics on campus rape as an official fiction and favors the slogan “Feminism is a cancer.”

His barbs are directed chiefly at liberals, feminists and Black Lives Matter activists, all of whom routinely show up to protest or disrupt his speeches. His followers film these confrontations and share them enthusiastically on YouTube and Facebook. In one video, Mr. Yiannopoulos arrives at a speech on a sedan chair carried by several young men wearing Trump hats.

“I knew I could have fun on campuses because they are so uptight and they are so ruled by the people I don’t like,” said Mr. Yiannopoulos, who considers himself a “free-speech fundamentalist.” He added, “Less cynically, they’re an important battleground.”

Shortly after the shooting, Mr. Yiannopoulos announced plans to speak at the University of Central Florida in Orlando. The university canceled his appearance, first citing a shortage of security personnel and then claiming that no suitable space was available on the 1,415-acre campus. Instead, Mr. Yiannopoulos spoke near the nightclub.

He stood just feet from the network television encampments, though none had sent cameras or reporters to cover him. Wearing a dark pinstriped suit under the unrelenting Florida sun, he warned of a gathering menace from Muslim immigrants, sprinkling his speech with anecdotes about sexual assaults in Germany and gender-segregated swimming pools.

In Mr. Yiannopoulos’s telling, liberals were dupes and hypocrites, so blinded by glib multiculturalism that they could not even admit how dangerous Islam was to gay people, like the victims of the Orlando massacre. To cheers and whoops, he praised Mr. Trump’s plan to bar Muslims from entering the country.

Afterward, fans lined up to get his autograph. Most seemed to be Trump supporters, but not all were conservative. Several described themselves as socially liberal or libertarian. A few said they just wanted to hear what Mr. Yiannopoulos had to say.

Screen Shot 2016-07-24 at 6.26.56 PM

Milo Yiannopoulos, right, spoke to supporters last month in Orlando, Fla., near the site of the Pulse nightclub shooting. Mr. Yiannopoulos tours college campuses, denouncing liberals, feminists and Black Lives Matter activists, among others.

Credit:Sam Hodgson for The New York Times

“The setup of U.C.F. has very few places where people are allowed to speak,” said Allen Greathouse, a slender 20-year-old from Melbourne, Fla. “You can only speak in the free-speech zones.”

Another student, Simon Dickerman, said he was voting for Mr. Trump. He volunteered that he frequently visited 4chan, an online message board where users compete with one another to post ever more provocative content, from Nazi shorthand to racist cartoons.

Mr. Dickerman said he understood why such images bothered some older people, though they carried little such charge to him and his friends.

“Of course they don’t actually want Jews to die,” Mr. Dickerman said. “They want to shock.” His peers, he added, “are kids who don’t really know about the Holocaust.”

“And they don’t care about history,” he said. “And some of them think it’s funny.”

Correction: July 13, 2016 

An earlier version of this article misstated the age of Andrew Anglin, founder of The Daily Stormer, a white supremacist website. He is 31, not 32.

Maggie Haberman and Kitty Bennett contributed reporting.

SOURCE ARTICLE

ANOTHER B’NAI BRITH BULLSHIT HOLOHOAX STORY By Paul Fromm (CAFE)

SimpsonsHolocaust

ANOTHER B’NAI BRITH HOLOHOAX BULLSHIT STORY

By Paul Fromm (CAFE)

Free speech in Canada? The right to dissent from perceived orthodoxy? You have to be kidding?

The snoops and censors of B’nai Brith sniffed out an article in a London, Ontario Arabic magazine, Al Saraha, that questions the numbers that have now formed a doctrine of the new religion of holocaust — namely, 6-million. B’nai Brith howled. The compliant London thought police, er “hate squad”, (yes, we really have political police in Canda, never mind all the phony window dressing about the rights of freedom of speech and freedom of the press in Trudeau Sr.’s fraudulent Charter of Rights and Freedoms) hop to it and investigate. Advertizers are contacted and, being firm believers in free speech, promptly jump ship and abandon the poor Arabs.. Liberal politicians, ever sucking up to the Third World vote, suddenly find themselves embarrassed and promise to pull future advertising. Actually, it all looks good on the multicultural crowd. Don’t confuse their stated commitment to “diversity” to mean diversity of opinion.

And the pathetic publisher is left babbling that he really didn’t know what was in the article and claimed he didn’t know Hitler is alleged to have killed six million Jews. [Come on, even the most inattentive high school student has had this number drilled into his head as our education system often demeans our own European history but slavishly peddles the tribal history of a special group.] It’s a sordid story all around.

The London Free Press (July 21, 2016) reports: “Condemnation is raining down on an Arabic magazine in London after it published a column questioning the Holocaust, the Nazi murder of six million Jews during the Second World War. But while the London police hate crime unit is investigating, and a national Jewish group urged Ontario Premier Kathleen Wynne’s government — an advertiser in the publication — to distance itself from the monthly Al Saraha, its publisher says he was unaware of the facts and apologizes to Jewish people.

1297859295516_ORIGINAL

Abdul Hadi Shala the owner and GM of Al Saraha in London. (MIKE HENSEN, The London Free Press

‘I didn’t mean to reject something that happened historically,’ Abdul Haidi Shala, speaking in Arabic translated into English, told The London Free Press on Thursday.’I was curious to know why Hitler killed Jews during the Holocaust, so I read through his article and I found information,’ the publisher said. …

B’nai Brith Canada, a national Jewish human rights organization [more Zionist BS. It’s a secret, Jews-only Masonic organization created by the Rothschilds over a hundred years ago. Ed. Topham], complained about the piece in the magazine’s June-July issue, with its chief executive calling the column “despicable” and “hateful.”

While some Holocaust deniers flatly reject that Adolf Hitler and his Nazi regime in Germany ran a campaign to wipe out Europe’s Jews, complete with notorious death camps that were killing factories, others quibble over the numbers killed and the history behind it.

The piece that ran in the London monthly falls into the second category, an English translation shows, describing the six million killed as ‘a number of impossible magnitude’ and blaming ‘Jewish propaganda’ that ‘managed to spread it and establish it.’

Shala, the magazine’s owner and general manager, said he didn’t know that the facts in the piece, which he said was written by an Egyptian journalist for another publication, were incorrect.

London police confirmed hate crime investigators are reviewing the piece, whose disputed edition carried a prominent Ramadan message by Premier Kathleen Wynne and members of her governing Liberals, and a smaller ad by hometown MPP Deb Matthews, the province’s deputy premier. … London Const. Chris Loizides confirmed police are investigating whether a Criminal Code offence occurred. …

[ Ontario Liberal cabinet member Deb] Matthews issued a statement saying the Ontario Liberals were ‘completely unaware’ of the magazine’s intent to publish the piece when they bought advertising for Ramadan greetings, and condemn ‘in the strongest possible terms’ the ‘anti-Semitic and homophobic views’ in the piece. [One wonders whether Christian publication can expect Christmas greetings from the wildly pro-homosexual, anti-Christian Ontario Liberals?]

‘I assure you that our caucus and I will no longer purchase advertising space in this publication,’ she said in the statement. …

A provincially-funded London agency that helps immigrants, the London and Middlesex Local Immigration Partnership, condemned the piece Thursday and yanked the magazine from its resource list for newcomers.

[B’nai Brith CEO Michael] Mostyn called that move and a statement by the organization’s co-chair, saying it doesn’t condone racist and homophobic views, a ‘positive step.’”

And thus works thought control in politically correct Canada.

Whatever happened to a good old letter-to-the-editor to set the magazine straight. However, the apostles of the tyrannical tribal religion of holocaust do not discuss or debate. And heresy is severely punished.

If this were a matter of historical FACT, it ought to be debatable. Indeed, the number of Jews allegedly killed in WW II has fluctuated wildly. Initially, a figure of 11-million was claimed; then, it was 7-million.By the 1970s, with the creation of the new religion of holocaust, the figure of 6-million became dogma. To question it might mean prison, job loss or fines in Germany and France — a situation suggestive that we are not dealing with history here but tribal legend. After the fall of communism, documents from Auschwitz revealed that the death toll there, formerly claimed at 4-million (about 70 per Jews) was actually about a million . Applying the same 70 per cent figure, this would reduce the Jewish death toll, from all causes, by some 2-million, but,strangely, this never reduced the 6-million figure. This is a mathematical miracle unparalleled since Jesus, we are told, multiplied five small loaves of bread and two fishes to feed a multitude of 5,000.

If this were merely Jewish tribal history, the figure wouldn’t much matter. They can tell one another whatever they like. However, as the new religion of holocaust is imposed on the West, it has implications — guilt mongering, a free pass for Israel, huge reparations payments. As such, it does become of matter of concern to know or. at least, discuss and debate whether what we’re being told is the truth.

Well, not in Canada


Original story

By Hala Ghonaim, Jennifer O’Brien, The London Free Press

Authoritarian Jasper Violates the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedom by Attempting to Silence Monika Schaefer’s Violin in Canada’s Jasper National Park by Prof. Tony Hall

BIGOTSVILLE

Authoritarian Jasper Violates the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedom by Attempting to Silence Monika Schaefer’s Violin in Canada’s Jasper National Park 

by Prof. Tony Hall

Screen Shot 2015-11-17 at 10.17.57 AM

To Dave Baker,

I am dumbfounded by the decision you delivered on behalf of some unnamed authority. To Ms. Monika Schaefer you write, “We have considered your application for a busking permit in Jasper. In light of your recently publicly proclaimed non-inclusive beliefs we have decided to decline a permit to you at this time.”

Please clarify who is included in this “we” on whose behalf you claim to speak? Who takes responsibility for the decision to violate core provision of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms in the community of Canada’s Jasper National Park?

This unilateral decision extends the so-far-unaccountable decision of those in Jasper’s Canada Day Committee to silence Monika Schaefer’s violin playing last July 1st. Because some Jasperites apparently threatened to disrupt the event, presumably in response to Ms. Schaefer’s peaceful video expression, the precedent was set that Jasper is a place of censorship where freedom of expression and conscience can be subordinated when threats of violence arise.

Now comes this gross violation of fundamental principles of Canadian decency, not to mention the rule of law, as dictated by whatever authority it is on whose behalf you, Dave Baker, claim to be acting in handing down this truly reprehensible arbitration.

Canadians should know that because of the treatment by officialdom of Monika Schaefer, a very active and contributing 35-year citizen of the community you share with her, Jasper should not be considered a safe place suitable for hosting international visitors. From what I have been learning, Jasper seems to be a place where intolerance and arbitrary measures go forward founded on nothing more than the political opinion of unaccountable decision makers.

So far Monika has been dis-invited from her invited Canada Day performance. She has, as reported in The Fitzhugh, been banned from the Jasper Legion No. 31 seemingly on the unilateral say so of Ken Kuzminki. She has been refused by The Fitzhugh newspaper a right of a full response. Her censored full response to the original smear piece against her was considerably shorter than Paul Clarke’s report. Now you and those unnamed individuals for whom you claim to speak have decided to discriminate against Ms. Schaefer because of her beliefs. Characterizing her opinion as “non-inclusive” you have determined she is ineligible for a busking permits to play music in the Jasper town centre.

Your decision is exclusionary as well as discriminatory. The actions taken by you and others are thought to be “justified” on the basis of personal opinions about her video, a 6 minute item that some dislike and many more like. At last count of the 70,000 or so views, over 1400 individuals registered a “like” of the video while almost 600 voted thumbs down.

Given the way Jasper authorities are dealing with this controversy so far, should those that express “like” for the video be banned from Jasper National Park? Should entry into Jasper National Park be conditional on expressing dislike with Ms. Schaefer’s “Sorry Mom” video? Should entrants to the park have to go through screening for political correctness? Should all existing residents be subjected to a thought test like that to which Ms. Schaefer is currently being subjected?

Will the next step be to require Ms. Schaefer to wear some marker, say with a Germany-related symbol, to announce to visitors that she is the punished Jasper citizen whose ideas are so verboten that her violin playing in the streets of Jasper has been prohibited? Will all applicants for a busking permit be subjected to Internet checks to make sure everything they have published is consistent the Values and Principles Statement emanating from the Jasper Community Habitat for the Arts? To do any less would be discriminatory.

I await your indication of who is behind the decision to ban Monika’s beautiful violin playing from the streets of Jasper because she dared speak her mind on a controversial issue that should be treated with nuanced responses rather than with the authoritarian approach that you express in your terse statement to her. How many benefit events in Jasper have been graced by Monika’s legendary violin playing, now transformed into a political football to be thrown around for self-interested political advantage by Jasper’s self-appointed arbiters of community values and tastes.

Yours Sincerely,

Tony Hall
Professor of Liberal Education and Globalization Studies
University of Lethbridge

——————————————
From: Dave Baker <betabake@gmail.com>
Sent: July 23, 2016 11:55:28 AM
To: Monika Schaefer
Subject: RE: Busking Permit

 We have considered your application for a busking permit in Jasper. In light of your recently publicly proclaimed non-inclusive beliefs we have decided to decline a permit to you at this time.

 habitatvaluestatement2 (1)

Traitorous, Zionist Secret Masonic Jew Lobby group B’nai Brith Canada Bitching & Whining and Complaining About Elementary School Teacher’s Support for Palestine By Jillian D’Amours | MEE

Traitorous, Zionist Secret Masonic Jew Lobby group B’nai Brith Canada Bitching & Whining and Complaining About Elementary School Teacher’s Support for Palestine

Pro-Israel group claims Shoufani called for ‘violence against Israelis’ when she said Palestinians had right to resist occupation.

By Jillian D’Amours | MEE | July 15, 2016

Screen Shot 2016-07-22 at 5.56.48 PMTORONTO, Canada :– A Toronto-area school board and Toronto city police are investigating an elementary school teacher after pro-Israel lobby groups complained about comments she made during a rally in solidarity with Palestinians.

The teacher, Nadia Shoufani, addressed a downtown Toronto rally on 2 July, marking al-Quds Day, an annual event held around the world to support Palestinian rights and to protest Israel’s occupation of the Palestinian territories.

“Silence in situations of oppression and injustices is a crime against humanity,” Shoufani said in her speech at the rally, in which she condemned the Israeli occupation and Israel’s policies of home demolitions, land confiscation and arrests of Palestinians.

Shoufani also quoted Palestinian writer Ghassan Kanafani, an important figure in the left-wing Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP), who was assassinated by Israeli Mossad agents in a car bombing in Beirut in 1972.

“We say no, no, no to the occupation. We are here to tell the world that Palestinians are not alone,” Shoufani said:

 

Pro-Israel lobby involvement

CanadaBBLOBBY3 copy 5

On its website, pro-Israel group Bnai Brith Canada accused Shoufani of “glorifying terrorists” in her speech.

“We are greatly concerned that an individual who espouses open support for terror and praises terrorist groups is teaching Canadian youth,” the group’s CEO, Michael Mostyn, said in a statement.

The group also accused her of “calling for violence against Israelis” by saying that Palestinians had a right to resist the Israeli occupation and its policies.

The Dufferin-Peel District Catholic School Board told Middle East Eye it is investigating Shoufani after the speech was brought to its attention by various sources, including Bnai Brith Canada and another pro-Israel group, the Friends of Simon Wiesenthal Centre.

ProPalHateCrime? copy 3

Shoufani teaches at an elementary school in Mississauga, a large suburb of Toronto, school board spokesperson Bruce Campbell said in an email. “We are actively investigating the issue brought to our attention,” Campbell said.

“In order to conduct a comprehensive investigation we are unable to place a definitive timeline on determining the results of an investigation at this point. However, given the serious nature of the issue, we would look to reach a resolution as quickly as possible,” he said.

 

Police launch investigation

Tyler Levitan, campaigns coordinator at Independent Jewish Voices-Canada, a group that supports Palestinian rights, said organisations like Bnai Brith Canada and Canadian Friends of Simon Wiesenthal “are shills for Israel”.

“Ms Shoufani was speaking passionately in support of the Palestinians’ right to defend themselves against an occupying power,” Levitan told MEE in an email.

“Under international law, those living under military occupation and a system of colonialism have the absolute right to resist. Ms Shoufani spoke as a defender of the rights of an occupied and besieged people to resist an obscenely violent and criminal military occupation over their lands.”

Meanwhile, Caroline de Kloet, a spokeswoman for the Toronto Police Service, told MEE on Thursday that a complaint was filed with police on 6 July about “comments made at a rally”.

De Kloet would not disclose which specific comments were subject to the complaint, or which and how many individuals were under investigation. She also would not disclose who filed the complaint.

“I can’t tell you who filed the report or what’s being looked into, or any of the specifics,” she said, “But right now there is a report on file and it’s being looked at.”

Shoufani could not immediately be reached for comment.

 

‘Put a chill’ on organizing

Recently, pro-Israel lobby groups in Canada have launched several campaigns targeting groups and individuals supporting Palestinian rights.

Bnai Brith Canada lauded a parliamentary motion passed earlier this year condemning the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement, which seeks to hold Israel accountable under international law.

In March, the Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs accused Canadian law professor Michael Lynk of demonstrating a pro-Palestinian bias and of being involved in “anti-Israel advocacy”. The accusations came after Lynk was appointed as the new Special Rapporteur on human rights in the occupied Palestinian territories.

Pro-Israel groups have also urged Canada to maintain funding cuts on the United Nations agency that supports Palestinian refugees, UNRWA.

They are also pressuring the Green Party of Canada to dismiss two motions, set to be debated at a party convention in August, that would strip the Jewish National Fund of its charitable status and endorse BDS.

“I know from past experience that Bnai Brith would be using every means possible to try to shut down the al-Quds rally,” said Ken Stone, treasurer of the Hamilton Coalition to Stop the War and another speaker at the al-Quds Day rally in Toronto this year.

Stone told MEE that Bnai Brith Canada has taken the comments made at the rally out of context and distorted them in an effort to shut down the annual event and silence Canadian supporters of Palestinian rights.

“What they’re trying to do is … put a chill on people like Nadia Shoufani,” he said.

“[And] put a chill on people who might be tempted to get up at an al-Quds rally and declare their support for the Palestinian cause.”

—-

This article was originally appeared on Mid East Eye.

Alberta Al’s letter to the Jasper Fitzhugh on the smearing of Monika Schaefer and her right to freedom of speech

ALBERTAALNEWHDR copy

From: “Al Romanchuk” romanesq@shaw.ca
Subject: The smearing of Monika Schaefer and her right to freedom of speech
Date: July 22, 2016

 

Mr. Clarke,

Not only was I disappointed in your article allowing the printing of the condemnation of Miss Schaefer by Ken Kuzminski and the two Jewsish organizations, I became downright angry.  I am an 80 year old now retired in Kelowna but was once the alderman and Mayor of Grande Prairie where I lived and worked as a lawyer for 15 glorious years.  Allowing Mr. Kuzminski to smear  and degrade Miss Schaefer, along with the Jewish organizations THE CENTRE FOR ISRAEL & JEWISH AFFAIRS and the EDMONTON JEWISH FEDERATION, for no apparent good reason other than in your OPINION she went too far in her video questioning the so-called Jewish holocaust.

I have been an avid free speech advocate all my life.  I believe that freedom of speech INCLUDES the right to offend.  If people don’t like what I say or write they don’t have to hear me nor read my articles.  But here you have allowed self-seeking groups and an individual to perpetuate a lie about Miss Schaefer when all she REALLY did was IN HER OPINION deny the holocaust.  And there are many deniers out there.

As a lawyer I have been taught to question, question, question and question because you’ll never get an answer without questioning.  So I took the liberty of writing to these two Jewish organizations, one of which labelled Miss Schaefer an “ignoramus” and “anti-semite”, and asked them a simple question:  SINCE YOU HAVE ASSERTED THE POSITIVE THAT THE GERMANS WERE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE KILLING OF EXACTLY 6 MILLION JEWS DURING WW2, PLEASE PROVIDE ME WITH WRITTEN AND SUBSTANTIATED EVIDENCE OF YOUR ASSERTION BECAUSE IT IS YOU THAT HAS THE BURDEN OF PROOF.  I have yet to receive answers.

KuzminskiNDP

As for Mr. Kuzminski he ought to be ashamed of himself as President of the Jasper Legion to inflame the public against Miss Schaefer for expressing her opinion.  Quite frankly I don’t think that Mr. Kuzminski knows the first thing about the history of the so-called Jewish holocaust of WW2.  His bigoted opinion against Miss Schaefer deserves the worst condemnation because as the grand pooh-bear of a prestigious organization he should know better.  If he doesn’t believe in free, unfettered speech then he should have the guts, the mettle, to say so.  The same goes for every Jewish organization in Canada.

I support Miss Schaefer and HER DEMOCRATIC RIGHT to say what she wants in a non-aggressive manner and her video is no exception.  Blocking freedom of speech and of the press is nothing short of silencing those of us who believe in the unrestricted right to our freedoms.

ALEXANDER S. ROMANCHUK
Kelowna, BC
Email: romanesq@shaw. ca