CAFE Seeks Leave to Appeal McCorkill Decision to the Supreme Court of Canada: Free Speech, Freedom of Belief & Property Rights at Stake

CAFE Seeks Leave to Appeal McCorkill Decision to the Supreme Court of Canada: Free Speech, Freedom of Belief & Property Rights at Stake

By Paul Fromm – CAFE Director

CAFELOGOFINAL

KELOWNA, BC., August 25, 2015. Paul Fromm, Director of the Canadian Association for Free Expression announced today that CAFE had,  instructed its lawyer Andy Lodge of St. John to seek leave from the Supreme Court of Canada to appeal against decision of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal nullifying the bequest of the late Robert McCorkill to the U.S. National Alliance.

RobertMcCorkillPhoto

“The July 30 decision by the Court of Appeals was dismissive and failed to deal with the substantive arguments and submissions both by CAFE’s lawyer and John Hughes, counsel for the  executor of the estate. In the end, there was no legal precedent for scrutinizing the character of the recipient,” Mr. Fromm said. “This case is crucial for freedom of belief, freedom of speech and property rights,” Mr. Fromm added.

The Court of Appeals decision was short and uninformative.

The brief two paragraph decision concluded: “Having regard to the application judge’s comprehensive reasons and his determination that  the bequest was void as it was against public policy, we can find no justification to interfere. We are in substantial agreement with the essential reasons of the application judge.

The final paragraph then slapped CAFE with $3,000 in costs ($9,000 total) to each of the parties supporting the nullification of the will on the grounds it was against public policy.

The bequest was deemed “contrary to public policy” because of the politically incorrect ideas of the National Alliance, racial views which are entirely legal in the U.S. where the NA is headquartered.

“After extensive consultations with our supporters in Canada and the U.S., CAFE decided to take this very costly step and seek leave of the Supreme Court to appeal this horrific decision which stomps on free speech and property rights,” said Mr. Fromm.

The Supreme Court grants leave in about only 10 per cent of cases. “However, ” said Mr. Fromm, “this case is of national importance. Its opens the door to endless litigation whenever a bequest is made to a controversial person or organization. It nixes the right of a person to dispose of his property as he sees fit.”

“We were assured by the lawyer for the Attorney General of New Brunswick during the original application that this was a once in a lifetime decision.”

Yet, Mr. Fromm noted, just eight months later, in the Spence case,  an Ontario judge tossed out a will where a Negro preacher disinherited a daughter who had a mixed-race child in favour of her sister who had adhered to her father’s racial views.

The executor for the estate is now appealing this decision.

“This is one of the most serious cases in which CAFE has ever been involved,” said Mr. Fromm. “However, freedom of belief, freedom of expression and property rights are on the line. In the words of Martin Luther,‘Here I stand, I can do no other, so help me God. Amen.” (Hier stehe ich. Ich kann nicht anders.)

____________________________________________________________

This appeal is a huge and costly undertaking. CAFE needs your support urgently.

CAFE, Box 332, Rexdale, Ontario, M9W 5L3

 

__   I believe property rights and the right of freedom of belief and freedom of expression are worth fighting for. Here’s my special donation of _____  to help  CAFE appeal the nullification of the the McCorkill will’s bequest to the National Alliance  to the Supreme Court of Canada.

__  Please renew my subscription for 2015 to the Free Speech Monitor ($15).

Please charge______ my VISA/Mastercard#___________________________________________________________________________

Expiry date: ______ Signature:_______________________________

 

Name:__________________________________________________

Address:________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________Email___________________________________

TIM HORTONS SUCCUMBS TO ZIONIST LOBBY PRESSURE AND BLOCKS RADICALPRESS.COM AGAIN! By Arthur Topham

TimCup???

RPpublisherinTimHortons

THAccess denied

ATEditorPic185

EDITOR’S UPDATE – Well it looks as though I was wrong in my estimation of Tim Hortons. Timmy DID NOT UNBLOCK RADICALPRESS.COM after all.  When I first published a Thank You post on August 25th they had unblocked my site but then within a day or so the censorship freaks from the Zionist-controlled B’nai Brith Canada were once again on their case and the block was back in effect and is still preventing readers from accessing RadicalPress.com in all the Tim Hortons outlets across Canada.

TimsQuesnel

At this point in time I’m undecided as to whether or not to openly promote a BOYCOTT TIM HORTONS CAMPAIGN. There were some amazingly well written letters to Tim Hortons requesting that they not censor my website but all of them appear to have had little effect on changing Timmy’s mind.

My time at the moment must be focussed on the upcoming trial but please do not hesitate to write to Tim Hortons and express your disgust with their Orwellian Zionist policy of censoring online websites. Try to bcc me at radical@radicalpress.com and I will compile an article later with all the requests (minus names and addresses). Thanks.

Time Hortons can be contacted here: TimHortonsWiFi@timhortons.com

—— 

Secret Spy Hearings in Vancouver: BCCLA Spotlights Witnesses Submitted by Tyee staff, 18 Aug 2015

http://thetyee.ca/Video/2015/08/18/CSIS-Secret-Hearing/?utm_source=daily&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=190815

logo

Secret Spy Hearings in Vancouver: BCCLA Spotlights Witnesses

Submitted by Tyee staff,

August 18th, 2015

Screen Shot 2015-08-28 at 6.16.56 PM

Hearings into complaints that CSIS has been spying on Canadian activists kicked off in Vancouver last week. The hearings were held in secret, with no access by the public or media. The witnesses were barred from speaking of their testimony after the hearings.

Despite the gag order, BC Civil Liberties Association released this short clip spotlighting some of the witnesses before they gave secret testimony. Witnesses included Grand Chief Stewart Phillip, Sierra Club campaign director Caitlyn Vernon and some members of Dogwood Initiative.

The groups alleging surveillance were protesting oil pipeline projects and claim their personal privacy was violated. Their claims are based on documents obtained under access to information requests. Read more about this underreported story here.

—–

The Imperialism of Jewish Capital by Henry Makow

illum3-leaderboard

http://henrymakow.com/the_imperialism_of_jewish_capi.html
The Imperialism of Jewish Capital
August 22, 2015

dragoncover copy

By 1864, 150 years ago, the wealth of the world already was concentrated in the hands of the Jewish central banking cartel.

“This Money Power of the Money Quarter of London is
the only grand pre-eminent Imperialism existing on the earth.”

Updated from Sept. 25, 2007

by Henry Makow Ph.D.

A book published in 1889 “The Red Dragon” by L.B. Woolfolk suggests to me that British (and American) imperialism originated in the need of  Jewish bankers and their Gentile confederates to translate money they could create out of nothing (thanks to their control of credit), into real wealth i.e. world ownership.

The book confirms my assertion that “the Jewish Conspiracy is British Imperialism.” (May 2004)

When these bankers finagled a credit monopoly in England in 1694, they turned into a monster that now has highjacked humanity. The London-based banking cartel literally has gobbled up the planet, and will not be content until it owns everything, and enslaves mankind, mentally and spiritually, if not physically. This, in a nutshell, is the New World Order.

The last push came from a secret society  that Cecil Rhodes started in 1891 to “absorb the wealth of the world” and “to take the government of the whole world.”

A recent UN study says 2% of the world’s population own 50% of the wealth, while half own barely 1% of the wealth. Needless to say, the richest 2% are mainly the London-based bankers and people associated with them.

Today British, American and Zionist imperialism manifest the banker agenda for “world government” through the destruction of religion, nation, race and family. This imperialism does not express the interests or wishes of ordinary English, American or Jewish people who have themselves been colonized.

THE RED DRAGON

Great.Red.Dragon

L.B. Woolfolk was an American Baptist preacher who traced the machinations of the banking cartel in the decades after the Civil War. He confirmed his assertions by contacts with members of this cartel during visits to London . He says “the Great Red Dragon” is the symbol of the “Jew London Money Power.”

In his book, which is on line, he describes how this cartel bought up the US economy  through intermediaries, and controlled it long before the passage of the Federal Reserve Act in 1913.
By 1864, 150 years ago, Woolfolk claims the wealth of the world already was concentrated in their hands.

“The Imperialism of Capital to which I allude is a knot of capitalists–Jews almost to a man–who make their headquarters in the Money Quarter of London, in Threadneedle street, Lombard, and other streets in that vicinity, where bankers have their habitat.

These Jew capitalists have succeeded in centralizing in their own hands the industry and commerce of the earth. –They own almost all the debts of the world, –the debts of nations, states, counties, municipalities, corporations and individuals, –amounting in the aggregate, it is estimated, to seventy-five billion dollars, on which they are annually receiving about four billion dollars of interest. –They own the manufactories, the shipping, and the commerce of Great Britain, and most of the manufactures, shipping and commerce of the whole world. –They have attained control of the industry and trade of the whole earth; and are rapidly centralizing all business in their own hands.

They hold possession of all the great lines of trade and business of all kinds, and they regulate all prices by their own arbitrary methods. This Money Power of the Money Quarter of London is the only grand pre-eminent Imperialism existing on the earth.”

east-india-company
Woolfolk traces the spread of imperialism to the British East India Company in the early part of the Eighteenth Century.

“In 1764, the British East India Company was the grandest and richest corporation in the world. It was the only corporation, which ruled a territorial empire. It was enriched by traffic, by the extension of its trade through the conquest of the trading stations of its Continental rivals and by the wholesale plunder of India….it came to pass that the greater part of the stock of the East India Company, and of the other companies afterwards organized out of the dividends of that great company, fell into the hands of the Jews. The Jews became the great Money Kings of the world…. History presents no career of conquest, in which fraud, deceit and rapine were so blended as in the conquest of India by the East India Company. It was the first example in the history of the world of a trading corporation becoming an imperial power; and its imperial rule was marked by the rapacity, chicane and fraud that characterize a great corporation in the soulless and conscienceless pursuit of gain.”

With the invention of the steam engine in 1775, only the capitalists of the British East India Company had the means to profit from the industrial revolution. They set up hundreds of joint stock companies – manufacturing companies of all kinds, coal and iron mining, railways and ships, real estate – which concealed their ownership.

“In commercial crises, often originated, and always manipulated by them, they managed systematically to break down rival companies, and buy them out, and to rob and plunder the minority stockholders; until, in the end, these organized capitalists got into their own hands and very cheap, all, or the greater part of the stock of the various companies, manufacturing, mercantile and shipping, that originated in steam manufactures. They thus reduced to a system and a science the art of crushing rival companies, and freezing out minority stockholders.”

Woolfolk speculates that the Rothschilds did not act alone but represented a syndicate of Jewish bankers.

lionel
(Crowns of Europe beg before Lionel Rothschild)

“The rise of the house of Rothschild is memorable as the first grand combination of the Jews in a syndicate, for the transaction of a vast business in which all their capital might be combined. The Rothschilds became the head of the Jew Money Kings, and have ever since been the head of the Jews, acting as a syndicate. That house is probably at the head of the Jew Money Power of the world. The wealth of the Money Power is simply beyond calculation. It cannot amount to less than $160,000,000,000. It is probably nearer two hundred billions…. The Money Power has so much money, now, that it can not find investment for it. In one more double it will about have all the property of the earth. In the beginning of its career, a double of its capital meant $100,000,000. Now a double of its capital means $400,000,000,000. And all the property of the world is less that $600,000,000,000.”

According to Woolfolk, the Rockefellers and most great American industrialist-financiers were merely agents of the London Money Power. Standard Oil is a classic example of how it established a monopoly in every enterprize. Owning the railroads needed to transport oil, the Money Power put competitors out of business by undercutting their prices.

This cartel of cartels kept the business class in line by creating the spectre of Communism:

“It is their policy to keep up a hot agitation for Communism and Socialism in the great cities; so that the businessmen, in their antagonism to those ideas, will keep on the side of the Money Power. It is a significant fact that most of the agitators for Socialism are Jews, who are most probably the agents of the Money Power to keep up this agitation for their own purposes… It is a part of the consummate craft of these Money Kings.”

CONCLUSION

“The Red Dragon” is an important reminder that even 150 years ago, wealth and power were concentrated in a relatively few hands. Modern history reflects the hidden machinations of this Money Power to advance their “world government.” The whole world is being colonized.

We see evidence today that one hand directs all the great multinationals. For example, they all sing from the same songbook of diversity, homosexuality and feminism.  All US Presidents are front men for this banking cartel. Their Cabinets are chosen from the ranks of the Rockefeller-controlled CFR. Presidents who defy the Money Power are eliminated. (i.e. most recently JFK and Nixon.) All the Presidential candidates support Israel which was created by the banking cartel to be  their world government capital.

This lethal problem arose because the nations of the world were too feckless to do something so simple as create their own currency. They relied on a network of Jewish bankers to create their medium of exchange in the form of  debt to themselves. No nation had the power or wit to break away from this worldwide imperialist system which is tightening its grip and inevitably must enslave mankind. Unfortunately, these bankers are not just interested in power or money. They are Satanists who wish to sabotage civilization and rededicate humanity to Lucifer.

We must reject this juggernaut in all its manifestations.  Common sense eventually will prevail not because it is common sense, but because continuous violation of common sense produces collapse.

____

 

NDP purge of pro-Palestine candidates plays into Harper’s hands By Justin Podur

DNP purge

https://ricochet.media/en/562/ndp-purge-of-pro-palestine-candidates-plays-into-harpers-hands

NDP purge of pro-Palestine candidates plays into Harper’s hands

By

Justin Podur

[Editor’s Note: All graphics furnished by RadicalPress.com] 

The Conservative Party is on the hunt, and with the help of the NDP and Liberals, they are cleansing Canadian politics of anyone who might think of Palestinians as human beings.

In the first weeks of the election campaign, two NDP politicians have had to distance themselves from statements about facts that are utterly obvious to anyone who knows Israel/Palestine, one nominated candidate has had to resign, and many more NDP members have been blocked by the party from seeking nominations to run for office.

Quebec NDP candidate Hans Marotte expressed past support for the first Palestinian intifada, a mass movement against Israel’s occupation to which Israel responded with the “broken bones” policy of violent repression. When the Conservatives dug up his comments, Marotte said it was proof they couldn’t find anything more recent. He didn’t recant, but he was effectively silenced.

Ontario NDP candidate Matthew Rowlinson had to issue a statement apologizing for signing an “incendiary and inaccurate” letter that included the documented and provable claim that ethnic cleansing of Palestinians is ongoing in Jerusalem. The “inaccurate” part of the letter said that Israel seeks a Jerusalem free of Palestinians. As for “incendiary,” we would do better to look at some of the weapons Israel deploys against Palestinians — more on that to come.

The tortured language of this reply to disgruntled supporters is a consequence of muddled thinking.
Screen Shot 2014-07-28 at 11.06.52 AM copy

Then there are those who have been dumped by the party. Nova Scotia NDP candidate Morgan Wheeldon had to resign for calling Israel’s 2014 attack on Gaza, which killed more than 2,200 people including more than 500 children, a war crime. NDP member Syed Hyder Ali, who had wanted to run in Edmonton, was told to withdraw his name — because he also said that Israel was guilty of war crimes. Jerry Natanine of Nunavut, the mayor of Clyde River, was tossed because, in his words, “I often side with the Palestinians because of all the hardship they are facing and because nothing is being re-built over there.”

Out of date, out of touch

Those who wrote to the party about Morgan Wheeldon’s forced resignation were treated to an incredibly out-of-date, out-of-touch email response, in which Wheeldon was accused of “minimiz[ing] the horror of violence targeting civilians,” which is “unacceptable and contrary to NDP policy, which condemns terrorism.” The party reply also repeats that the NDP supports “a two-state solution that would see Palestinians and Israelis living side by side in independent states.”

The tortured language of this reply to disgruntled supporters is a consequence of muddled thinking. In 2014, it was very clear that the monstrously outmatched Palestinian fighters were focused on military targets. Of 72 Israeli casualties, 66 were soldiers. The “horror of violence targeting civilians” was experienced mainly by Palestinians. Is the NDP saying that what Israel is doing to Palestinian civilians can be justified by “terrorism,” which presumably refers to the use of rockets by Palestinians (and not the use of heavy artillery and bombs by Israel)?

He should be clear that these circumstances include the high-tech slaughter of children.

NDP policy is at least a decade out of date. No one in Israel is interested in a two-state solution or a peace process. Israel took a decision just over a decade ago to “freeze” the peace process. Since then, Israel’s war against the Palestinians has continuously expanded, with attacks on Gaza’s trapped, defenceless population in 2006, 2008-2009, 2012, and 2014.

To be fair, Wheeldon’s Facebook posts, which mentioned the bombings of buses by Hamas, were also a decade out of date. The last bus bombing by Hamas was around 2005, and in the ten years since, the organization — labeled “terrorist” by all parties in Canada — has focused increasingly on confronting the vastly more powerful Israeli military, while that military has focused its incredible firepower on Palestinian civilians. It may also be worth mentioning that Hamas has been fighting against ISIS in Gaza, and has lost lives doing so, while there is de facto collaboration between Israel and al-Qaeda in Syria, as Asa Winstanley and others have reported.

Infanticide

The NDP’s response reveals that it does not understand Israel/Palestine today. How might the NDP go about gaining such an understanding?

There is Amnesty International and Forensic Architecture’s Gaza Platform, which has data on every bomb and shell that Israel launched into Gaza in its 2014 attack. It reveals a pattern of attack that is hard to explain in any way except as the targeting of civilians and civilian infrastructure. It was built as an accountability tool, in the hopes that justice will eventually be done, and that those responsible for the deaths of thousands of civilians, the destruction of thousands of homes, and the deliberate targeting of hospitals, schools, medical personnel, and UN facilities will face some kind of legal consequences.

Don'tKilltheChildren copy 8

There are statistics, like the fact that infant mortality in Gaza has risen for the first time in 50 years, thanks to Israel’s siege on the territory it has attacked three times in the past six years. Or the fact that life expectancy for Palestinians is 10 years shorter than for Israelis. Or the fact that Israel decided almost a decade ago, explicitly, to limit the number of calories available to people in Gaza — to “put them on a diet.”

Only one side, the Israeli side, controls every detail of every Palestinian life in Gaza and the West Bank.

There is Mads Gilbert’s new book, Night in Gaza, in which the Norwegian doctor who has spent many years visiting Gaza describes the 2014 attack as the worst he’s seen. The book shows pictures of the heroic medics and doctors who try to save lives and treat injuries as Israel tests new kinds of shrapnel on Gaza’s children. Gilbert describes what he saw as “infanticide.” He notes that, with a median age of 18, more than half of Gaza’s 1.5 million people are children. Those children are not allowed to leave — they are sealed in behind a wall on three sides and a navy patrolling the sea on the other. Israel has imprisoned them. Gaza, notes Gilbert, is not just a prison, but a child prison.

When Mulcair says, as he did in 2008, that he is “an ardent supporter of Israel in all situations and circumstances,” he should be clear that these circumstances include the high-tech slaughter of children, the imprisonment of children, the imposition of of caloric intake formulas for children, and increased infant mortality and reduced life expectancy. By a matter of simple logic, these are all things that Thomas Mulcair supports.

Destruction

There is Max Blumenthal’s book, The 51 Day War, with its harrowing tales of Palestinians people herded by Israeli soldiers at gunpoint into a house and forced to stay there in the house at gunpoint until the house is bombed and dozens of people are killed.

There is also Harvard economist Sara Roy’s article, which includes a quote summarizing Israel’s approach to Gaza: “No development, no prosperity, no humanitarian crisis.”

Then there is the Israeli side, for which the required reading is Breaking the Silence’s report, “This is How We Fought in Gaza.” It includes testimonies from Israeli soldiers about what they did in Gaza last year. Every single one of them — and there are 111 — is shocking in some way. Choose a few at random. Maybe read about the soldiers’ songs, like “Palestinians only sing the chorus as they have no verses (houses) left” (testimony 1). Or read about the targeting protocols, about how decisions to fire on buildings were made (testimony 51):

“Throughout the entire operation there was a sort of building far away near the coastline… it wasn’t a threat to us, it had nothing to do with anybody, it wasn’t part of the operation… but that building was painted orange, and that orange drove my eyes crazy the entire time. I’m the tank gunner, I control all the weapons systems … So I told my platoon commander ‘I want to fire at that orange house’, and he told me: ‘Cool, whatever you feel like’, and we fired.”

It is playing the right’s game, which it can’t win.

After a few testimonies, readers can take a break and watch a video of Israeli protesters chanting another song outside the hospital of a Palestinian hunger striker: “Why is there no studying in Gaza? Because they have no children left!” Spend some time looking at some terrifying tweets from last year by teenagers taking selfies with captions including “Death to the Arabs.”

Remember that Israeli newspapers are running columns with headlines like “When Genocide is Permissible,” and Israeli politicians call Palestinian children “little snakes.” And anyone thinking that indifference to civilian lives or hateful, racist, and genocidal beliefs are common to both sides might remember that only one side, the Israeli side, controls every detail of every Palestinian life in Gaza and the West Bank, from where they can and can’t go to their very caloric intake.

Playing the right’s game

Israel is heading in an ever-more genocidal direction towards the Palestinians. Support for this move is only possible for those who give up any pretence of anti-racism, universal human rights, anti-militarism, and democracy. It is only possible, in other words, on the right side of the political spectrum.

1_boycott-israel-campaign_2006_50_70_amer-shomali-basel-nasr1 copy 2

On the other side of the spectrum, the pro-Palestine movement and Palestinian civil society are working on a rights-based, not a solutions-based, framework, and are working towards boycott, divestment, and sanctions (BDS). Many Canadian politicians have heard of the BDS movement, at least for long enough to denounce it. Mulcair, for example, has said that he finds BDS “grossly unacceptable,” as one might expect of someone who ardently supports Israel in every situation and circumstance.

If the progressive position supporting BDS is grossly unacceptable, perhaps Mulcair might find more acceptable Hamas’s conditions for a 10-year truce with Israel: an end to the siege of Gaza and the opening of a seaport, an airport, and the land crossing into Egypt. This is actually far short of the NDP’s quaint espousal of a two-state solution, since the occupation would continue. But all the same, for the NDP to call for the opening of Gaza and the freeing of 750,000 children from prison in today’s context would be politically significant indeed. It won’t happen for exactly that reason.

These may be the evil political calculations that have to be made in order to succeed electorally. But here is something to consider. If the NDP purges the progressive, pro-Palestine voices from its party out of fear of supporters of Israel’s ever-escalating violence against the Palestinians, it is playing the right’s game, which it can’t win. Israel’s national politics, which has drifted so far to the right that to call someone a leftist is an insult (and “punch a lefty, save the homeland” and “good night, left side” are slogans chanted at pro-war demonstrations), could teach the NDP something about how this works. There, too, left and liberal parties spent the past few elections trying to pander to centre-right sentiment, and have basically disappeared as a political force.

The NDP’s purge of pro-Palestine candidates can only help Stephen Harper, who doesn’t talk nonsense about a two-state solution but simply and openly supports whatever Israel wants and is doing. Those who want that will vote for Harper, not the NDP.

GazaUprising copy 3

Meanwhile, if voters want to cast their ballot this October for a major Canadian party that believes that Palestinians are human beings too, they can’t.

——

About the author

Justin Podur is an activist and writer based in Toronto, and the author of Haiti’s New Dictatorship.

 

STOP HARPER! A RadicalPress.com Public Safety Announcement

StopHarper

THANKS TIM HORTONS FOR SUPPORTING FREEDOM OF SPEECH ON THE NET! RadicalPress.com

TIMHORTONSTHANKS

 

 

 

ATEditorPic185

As of yesterday I’m pleased to report that Tim Hortons has unblocked RadicalPress.com in all its outlets across Canada.

My sincere thanks to all those readers who took the time to register their disapproval of this censorship policy with Tim Hortons. Their well written letters I believe were a deciding factor in having this un-Canadian type activity changed for the better.

While Tim Hortons did not write to me and let me know of the changes all reports thus far indicate that the channels of communication are again open for their customers to enjoy both their coffee and their wifi without further problems.

Tim Hortons Censors RadicalPress.com in their Coffee Outlets across Canada by Arthur Topham

TimHortonCensorship

Tim Hortons Censors RadicalPress.com in their Coffee Outlets across Canada

By
Arthur Topham

RPEdNew300 copy

Will it ever end? Everywhere we turn these day on the Internet someone is trying to censor you. Now it appears that one of Canada’s oldest coffee outlets, Tim Hortons, has also joined the Zionist Jews in deciding who they will allow their customers to visit online while they’re having coffee and a donut.

Over the past while I’ve had a number of readers email me telling me that when they’re in Tim Hortons they can’t access my website and when they try to they get the following message pop up on their screen:

THAccess denied

“inappropriate content”???!!! Says who? Is there someone working in this coffee venue who sits and views every website on the net and makes some subjective, arbitrary decision that they don’t like RadicalPress.com and so they simply block it to spare their thousands of customers from seeing the site?

Well I certainly don’t think there’s anything “inappropriate” on my site and so on August 11, 2015 I sent an email to Tim Hortons at the address they provide in their pop-up window TimHortonsWiFi@timhortons.com saying:

Dear Tim Hortons WiFi,

It has been brought to my attention by a number of my readership both here in British Columbia and also in Alberta that when frequenting your coffee outlets they are unable to access my website RadicalPress.com.

Being a regular visitor to one of your outlets in Quesnel, British Columbia where I live and run my publishing business I have also experienced this. Here is a screen shot of what readers and I see when we go to visit my site and read articles and news stories which I have been publishing online for the past 16 years. (see above)

I am not sure where you have received your information that there is “inappropriate content” on my site but my educated guess is that whatever software you are using for your WiFi system has erroneously and/or possibly intentionally included my website for purely political reasons.

I have ran a publishing business here in British Columbia  since June of 1998 and have been online since 1999. While Radical Press is known to be a part of the Alternative News media rather than the Mainstream media this does not imply that the content on my website is somehow “inappropriate”. It may be contrary to the Mainstream media but then that is perfectly legitimate in a free and democratic society such as Canada is.

I would therefore request that you please unblock my website so that your customers can not only enjoy your fine coffee but also whatever news sites that they, of their own free will, choose to visit while they are in your restaurant.

Since realizing that you are censoring my business I have stopped visiting my local Timmy’s and now spend my money at Starbucks instead. I would like to be able to buy your coffee and donuts as I have been doing for many many years but of course I expect you to respect my right to remain in business as well.

I look forward to hearing from you regarding this matter at your earliest convenience.
Sincerely,

Arthur Topham
Pub/Ed

radical@radicalpress.com
The Radical Press
Canada’s Radical News Network
“Digging to the root of the issues since 1998″

The next day, August 12, 2015 I received the following email from TimHortonsWiFi@timhortons.com:

Good day,

Thank you for your email.
We have received your request and it is in the process of being reviewed.

TimHortonsWiFi@timhortons.com

I immediately replied saying, “Thank you for your prompt reply. I will await your review.”

By August 16 I still had no response and so I wrote again saying:

Dear TimHortonsWiFi,

It is my understanding that you are in the coffee and food industry and not in the business of censoring websites that are legitimate business enterprises.

I feel that you’ve had more than sufficient time to come to what ought to be a very simple solution which is to unblock my site.

We in the Alternative News Media don’t take too kindly to harassment and censorship as that is the main reason why we exist because the mainstream media isn’t doing its job.

I will ask you civilly once again to unblock my site and should I not get a clear answer from you within 48 hours then you will have to bear the consequences of your irresponsible actions.

You have absolutely NO reason to be doing this and ought to be ashamed of your undemocratic, communist tactics.

The next day, August 17, I received an identical reply as I did the first time I contacted them telling me that my “request is in the process of being reviewed”.

Again I replied by stating:

It’s apparent that you either have a robot responding to my emails or else you are not serious in attending to my concerns regarding your censorship actions against my website.

As I stated I would like my site unblocked within 48 hours.

By August 19, 2015 there was still no reply forthcoming from TimHortons so I sent them one final email stating:

Dear TimHortons,

This is my final gesture of good will. You need to ask yourselves whether or not it’s worthwhile for you to be censoring other business’s websites.

I have yet to go online with my planned campaign of telling Canadians and the world at large about your illegal and unethical practises and the boycott of your business.

The following graphic is but a sample of what you will have to deal with.

TimHortonCensorship

Please reconsider your position and respond to me immediately or else I will take it that you are determined to block my site.

As of August 22, 2015 and numerous requests I’ve yet to hear back and so I’m taking my concerns online as I advised TimHortons.

Obviously whoever is in charge of dealing with blocked sites on Tim Hortons wifi is asleep at the wheel and in dire need of a Extra Large Triple Triple dark roast in order to wake them up!

This is where you, dear friends on Facebook and readers elsewhere can lend me a hand. It won’t cost you a cent. All you need to do is take a moment of your time and send Timmy a brief email asking them to unblock RadicalPress.com. When you do that please bcc me a copy of your email at radical@radicalpress.com so I can get an idea of how many requests are being sent to them.

I’m hoping that if they start to receive more requests than just from me that they will unblock the site.

Also, Tim Hortons is on Facebook as well so maybe those of you on FB might pop over to their page and post a comment regarding this matter. I certainly plan to do so.

Let’s see if we can help them to change their minds.

——

Alex Jones debates Dr. David Duke – Full Interview

JonesvDuke

RPEdNew300 copy

Dear Reader,

This debate by the controlled Alternative Alex Jones and the free and open Dr. David Duke is likely one of the most important discussions that the Internet community has witnessed ever and sums up in no uncertain terms the depth of the deception that has been created by the Zionist Jewish power elite.

It’s absolutely essential that anyone interested in the Jewish Question watched this debate to the end. Alex Jones has, from what I’ve learned, now removed this debate from his website due to its incriminating effect upon his now exposed agenda of always trying to cover up the major role that the Zionist Jews have played throughout the 20th Century and the 21st.

Please watch it and pass it along to anyone who may still be confused about who is running the world at this point in our history.

•••• ••••

Please help out with my upcoming Sec. 319(2) “Hate Propaganda” trial in October by making a donation.

Donations can be made online via my GoGetFunding site located at http://gogetfunding.com/canadian-publisher-faces-jail-for-political-writings/ or else by sending cash, cheques or Money Orders to the following postal address. Please make sure that any cheques or Money Orders are made out to – Arthur Topham – and sent to:

Arthur Topham
4633 Barkerville Highway
Quesnel, B.C.
V2J 6T8

Alberta Al: Open your eyes fellow Canadians to the harsh reality facing you. By Al Romanchuk

ALBERTAALNEWHDR

 

Commenting first on the meeting in Edmonton where Dr. Kevin Barrett was giving a book presentation Alberta Al had the following to say:

Both of us were at that meeting Sunday night.  I never saw a hint of the presence of the hate speech squad twosome from the EDMONTON CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT.  Orwellian world, indeed!  We are now officially a POLICE STATE and our freedoms are being eroded daily by Harper, his clique, the opposition all being controlled by Zionist Israel and their subversive forces here in Canada.  I never heard ONE WORD of hate emanating from the mouth of Dr. Barrett.  All he did was give a review of his new book on Charlie Hebdo.  Yet the goon squad from our own police department in effect crashed the meeting to see if hate propaganda was being spread.  And no one would answer the question of WHO sent them.  Well, I can certainly read between the lines when the people at B’Nai Brith would not answer any questions nor return any calls to Dr. Hall.  I am appalled that under Harper’s new terrorist legislation we are ALL suspects and could be arrested and incarcerated for speaking freely in a free country.  Harper is spreading fear and hatred and is using the conflicts in the Middle East to invade their countries without invitation.  None of those countries have declared war on us, but also their hatred of our way of life and religion is well known.  Why we can’t leave well enough alone, I simply cannot understand.

As a Canadian of 79 years of age I have never seen nor heard of our own police departments surreptiously and cunningly enter a meeting and not answering the question of WHO sent them there.  When Harper, the hypocrite, talks about saving our freedoms what he means is that whenever B’nai Brith and its sister organizations complain about anyone delivering a so-called hate speech he really means that he is putting the shackles on those freedoms.  The video is a disgusting show of bullshit at its best.  He is fanning the flames of disorder and discontent and divisions within our country and no one is taking him to task.

Harper IS the false flag is ever there was one being waved.  He has garnered the disrespect of all kinds of nations around the world because of his ties to the USA and other western countries but most notably to Zionist Israel.  It is hard to fathom the villainous role we are playing on the world’s stage, a stage where at one time our virtual neutrality made us one of the most respected nations on this planet.  My how things have changed in such a short period!

If these incursions into public meetings, into the internet continue unabated you can rest assured that our right to bear arms will be safely guarded.

**** ****

Responding to a second set of emails from an associate where they sent Al the following online articles:

CSIS Eyeing Threat Of Growing Anti-Islam Movement Online

Quebec Bill Targets “People Who Write Against The Islamic Religion”

Al’s reply was:

Thank you for sending this to me.  Over the years I have read about anti-Islamic pronouncements and anti-semitic denunciations.  All of which prove one point:  THAT THE JEWS HAVE HATED THE ARABS/MUSLIMS SINCE BEFORE THE MIRACULOUS BIRTH OF JESUS CHRIST AND VICE VERSA.  This is a never-ending battle of ideologies and rabid religious fanaticism.  The Huff Post has some interesting articles.  The first one on your list is several months old and Bill C-51 has now become law and used here in my home town against a freedom loving American citizen.  The second is current and should scare the pants off the right-thinking Quebecois.

The Jews in Canada use deceit and cunning devices to influence Harper into taking action against the extremist Muslims.  The Muslims in Canada use similar tactics to get their message across against the Jews.  Tit for tat, as they say!  But let’s lay the blame for all this anti-semitism and anti-Islamism where it belongs:  IN THE LAST 9 YEARS AT THE DOOR STEPS OF HARPER!  It is he and his immigration Ministers who have permitted the wholesale entry into MY country of ultra right wing Jews fortified by Mossad, and more recently the emigration into MY country of the Muslims from the Middle East especially now from Syria.

As I have pointed out before Harper was able to find some $200 billion to purchase destructive weapons (bombs mostly) and unleash them against ISIS (if they could be found) but in the process have bombed the shit out of the Syrians killing innocent men, women and children.  That makes the Jews happy!  The Jews on the other hand will kill innocent Palestinians and blockade their country (what’s left of it) denying its people needed consumer supplies for their survival.  Neither side has any shame whatsoever in what they are doing.  Harper has no GD conscience but follows orders directly from Netanyahu and the Obama administration to name a few.

Canada has NOT been an independent, free-thinking neutral country, admired and respected around the world, for decades.  We are just as hated as the Jews and Yankees and Brits and French and Germans et al.  We portray the villains on stage and our roles are directed by the the Jews and Yanks who are pleased with our invasionary tactics into other countries on false flag issues, with which I’m sure you are familiar.  By the passage of the anti-terror bill WE, the true Canadians, will be spied on by, of all people, our OWN city and town police forces.  We can be arrested without charge for no valid reason other than being able to speak freely about issues that matter.  And with all the ultra right-wing nuts here in Canada I think Harper can be assured of another victory in October, thanks to the preponderance of power over the ROC in Ontario and Quebec.   In voting for Harper we have unwittingly given him unbridled power to do whatever the hell he wants…………and he does it without any accountability.  And it appears that the opposition agrees with almost everything he does making it appear to us stupid Canadians that they oppose him!  What utter nonsense.  By the same token if either the Lieberals or NDP were to gain power they would do the same thing.  THERE ARE NO CHECKS AND BALANCES IN CANADA AGAINST THE ABUSE OF POWER!

As for the two bills in Quebec proffered by Premier Couillard, which will be passed no doubt, Quebec will have officially become a FASCIST STATE governed by its Gestapo.  Giving the QHRC additional powers to arrest people WITHOUT any complaints being filed is the first step in becoming a fascist state, and the commissioner – by his very words – lusts for these new powers bestowed upon him and his kangaroo court.  But are the Quebecers concerned?  Not in the least!  Have you read anything in the MSM or social media from ordinary citizens critical of these two bills?  I haven’t.  Do Quebecers seem to care that their freedoms are being gobbled away not simply whittled away?  It appears not.  I surmise that the ordinary Quebecer simply wants to be left alone to his own devices: making cheese, harvesting maple syrup, paying 1/2 the tuition that university students in the ROC pay, enjoying the economic benefits of a lot of manufacturing and most of all being very pleased as the recipient of the largest proportion of EQUALIZATION PAYMENTS courtesy of Alberta and Saskatchewan.  Aaaah, what a life to be on the dole forever and a day at the expense of those of us who have to pay your way to idleness.  You Ontarians also enjoy the benefits of our generosity so don’t be smug about it!

You know, it was in 1966 that I received my private pilot’s license because at 30 years of age, on a scale of 1 to 10 on being CANADIAN, I was about an 8 and proud of it.  I was ready at that time to complete any pilot training to become a jet fighter pilot and shoot down those Ruskies who fly over our territory.  It didn’t take long for me to see the extreme changes going to happen in MY country since the election of PET in 1968.  Politicians refused to answer letters, phone calls and emails.  Their salaries and perks grew disproportionately to the work they were doing and we stupid Canadians did nothing about it – except me who railed against these exorbitant payments.  Why do you think we have so many people vying to be candidates for the various parties in the ridings?  They know they can sit back in their comfortable pews with their feet atop the government-owned desks and not bother to do anything except collect their pay cheques.   Today on a scale of 1 to 10 I’m about a 3 when it comes to being a true Canadian.  I would not take up arms to defend MY country given the type of leadership we have today which is undisciplined, immoral and corrupt ( with most of them being sinful church-goers).  I would take up arms to defend myself against any aggressor, and when I say any aggressor I mean state or otherwise!

Open your eyes fellow Canadians to the harsh reality facing you.  I’m too GD old to do anything about anything except write about what I see, read and hear.  If the young generation – those between 16 and 60 – don’t stand up and fight for what is right, what has been our traditions, our values then be prepared to forfeit what you own to the state with no compensation.  The choice is yours: do or die!
—-
Al can be contacted at: Al Romanchuk romanesq@shaw.ca

Canada’s B’nai Brith Moves to Outlaw Free Speech and Academic Freedom by Anthony Hall, Veterans Today

ATEditorPic185

Editor’s Note: The following article by Tony Hall is, overall, an excellent depiction of what happens to a free and democratic nation when it is surreptitiously invaded by a clandestine, foreign ideology and then its civil and legal infrastructure is perverted and diverted off course to the point where the government no longer represents the interests of the people but, instead, obeys the edicts of the foreign entity that has co-opted the nation. In this case it is the malevolent actions of Canada’s Zionist lobby organization B’nai Brith Canada which, as my readers will undoubtedly understand from many previous references throughout my own work, is the same organization that has been harassing me and intimidating me since 2007 and was directly responsible for having its agents accuse me under Sec. 319(2) of Canada’s Criminal Code of publishing and spreading “Hate Propaganda” toward Jews which led to my incarceration and the theft of my computers and electronic files in May of 2012 and since, a long and costly legal battle which will culminate this fall when a trial by judge and jury will commence in Quesnel, B.C. on October 26th, 2015.

Readers interested in the history and motives of this serpentine organization are strongly encouraged to read the following in-depth analysis of its sordid and dangerous past found at the following url http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=1410 . 

Screen Shot 2015-08-19 at 1.01.30 PM

In his article Dr. Anthony Hall refers to B’nai Brith as ” the oldest “Jewish services” organization in North America.” But this is far short of what this Jewish organization truly is when one delves into its hoary and shadowy past. What readers need to understand fully is that B’nai Brith International is a secretive, Jews-only Freemason Order that was created by the same Rothschild criminal cartel that now controls the Western world’s financial empire and was also instrumental in the creation of the false-flag entity that we all know as the “state” of Israel.

An additional article written back in January of 2008 gives yet another view as to this “service” organization’s secret agenda:

100thMonkeyHdr-copy

http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=628

As well, B’nai Brith Canada has played a crucial role in designing and implementing Canada’s “Hate Propaganda” legislation that they were successful in planting into Canadian jurisprudence after the end of World War II. 

But apart from B’nai Brith Canada there is one other serious error in Dr. Hall’s otherwise astute and truthful description of what has happened to Canada under the dictatorship of Stephen Harper and the Conservative government and that is his indirect reference to Germany during the period when it was ruled by the National Socialist government of Adolf Hitler.  In referencing the shooting incident in Ottawa on Parliament Hill on October 22, 2014 Dr. Hall states, “This event was used to justify Bill C-51, now the Anti-Terrorism Act of 2015, which Rocco Galati and others have observed replicates much of the legislation supporting the fascist governments in Germany and Italy in the 1930s.” This statement is of course pure Zionist propaganda and should not have appeared as a metaphor for what is happening in Canada today or in any other democratic nation around the world where the Zionist Jews are hard at work spreading their lies and their hate and implementing their “Hate Crime” laws in order to cover up their own misfeasance and traitorous actions. 

Using the National Socialist government of Adolf Hitler as a comparison to what’s going on today globally is, in itself, a false flag. All of what we are witnessing now is a direct result of the actions of the Zionists and have nothing whatever to do with Adolf Hitler and the German nation but are perfectly in line with the actions of the former Soviet Union and the Communist system which has followed this type of modus operandi since it first overtook the Russian Empire back in 1917. If Dr. Anthony Hall is looking for an historical connection to the events of today all he needs to do is look at the Communist system that overran Europe beginning in the former Russian Empire and then spread its evil ideology throughout North America. Rocco Galati and “others” are wrong to equate the present political machinations of the Zionist Jews with Hitler and Germany and Dr. Hall is also remiss in having referenced them in connection with the Ottawa shooting.

—-

 

vt-logo2015b

hall

Is Harper’s Hate Speech Contaminating Canada?

Canada’s B’nai Brith Moves to Outlaw Free Speech and Academic Freedom
by Anthony Hall, Veterans Today
August 18, 2015

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2015/08/18/is-harpers-hate-speech-contaminating-canada/

As Dr. Kevin Barrett has reported, our recent book tour of Western Canada culminated in an attempt by the B’nai Brith to shut down our event on August 16 at the Rossdale Community League Hall in Edmonton, Alberta. Due in large measure to the principled fortitude of the community hall’s manager, Richard Awid, the event did take place.

Screen Shot 2015-08-19 at 11.44.57 AM

The first half of the proceedings were monitored by two officers of the Edmonton Police Service’s Hate Crime Unit. The police officers may have been instructed to intervene in this way by officials of the B’nai Brith, the oldest “Jewish services” organization in North America.

The Canadian branch of the B’nai Brith is deeply intertwined with the federal government led by Prime Minister Stephen Harper whose current bid for re-election is arguably based on a steady and unrelenting stream of hate speech.

The Stephen Harper neocons are presently seeking a second majority mandate from the Canadian electorate by presenting themselves as the leaders of a anti-Muslim jihad campaign involving the Canadian Armed Forces, Canada’s heavily politicized police forces, together with the media empire of the New York-based Golden Tree Hedge Fund.

Paul Godfrey is the chief intermediary linking the Golden Tree investor group with the Zionist-dominated  Postmedia and Sun News outlets that dominate key facets of mass communications in Canada. The Postmedia newspaper chain was given its current extreme form of pro-Israel spin by former media mogul Conrad Black who initially hired Jonathan Kay.

Kay has authored a classic hate-speech diatribe including a calculated smear job directed at Dr. Barrett. Entitled Among The Truthers: A Journey into the Growing Conspiracist Underground of 9/11 Truthers, Birthers, Armageddonites, Vaccine Hysterics and Internet Addicts, Kay’s book was published by Rupert Murdoch’s media network.

Kay’s disinfo text received backing from the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies, a pro-Israel, anti-Iranian lobby group whose key membership is derived from the now notorious neocon think tank, the Project for the New American Century.

Stoking the Flames of Anti-Muslim Hatred Through Unsubstantiated Smear and Disinformation
I spoke to Richard Awid, the manager of the Rossdale Community League Hall close to the banks of the North Saskatchewan River in the capital of the oil-rich province of Alberta, now known widely as Texas North as well as Stephen Harper’s primary political base. In our conversation Mr. Awid explained to me that he is a Muslim whose Muslim ancestors arrived in Canada in 1901. Mr. Awid was somewhat dumbfounded that a small event at his community hall, “one of 100 such venues in Edmonton,” would elicit such an intense response from a very powerful organization in Toronto. He played back to me on his answering machine a recorded message he received at about 9 am on August 12 from Amanda Hohmann. Ms. Hohmann explained that she had received “a few complaints” about “Mr.” Kevin Barrett on the B’nai Brith’s “anti-hate hotline.” (1-416-633-6224; 1-800-892-2624)

Ms. Hohmann asserted that “Mr. Barrett is a known anti-semite conspiracy theorist, a Holocaust Denier, and 9/11 Denier and all sorts of other things.

Ms. Hohmann made no effort whatsoever to give background proof of her allegations or to identify the sources of the supposed “complaints.” Nevertheless she proposed to Mr. Awid that he should “cancel the event  and let Mr. Barrett know he is not welcome in Edmonton.”

Perhaps Ms. Hohman and her B’nai Brith colleagues have simply taken at face value the disinformation on Dr. Barrett published by Jonathan Kay in Among The Truthers. Apparently the B’nai Brith like Mr. Kay, one of the ghost writers of Justin Trudeau’s recent autobiography, felt it unnecessary to address the evidence of what did or did not happen on 9/11 before smearing those that have questioned various aspects of the now-thoroughly-discredited official cover story. Those that have taken the time to investigate the available evidence could rightfully conclude that the likes of Kay, Hohmann or the very unskeptical propagandist Michael Shermer, are the ones that best deserve deserve of the label, “9/11 Deniers.”

 

Screen Shot 2015-08-19 at 11.45.11 AM

On the Genesis and Current Character of Mr. Netanyahu’s Global War on Terror
Mr. Awid explained how he felt compelled by the B’nai Brith’s alarming message to do due diligence in order investigate Ms. Hohmann’s unsupported allegations. He outlined for me how he did his own Internet research and contacted the Edmonton Police Service.

In discussing his own investigations Mr. Awid made it very clear that Stephen Harper and his Defense Minister, Jason Kenney, seem to be conducting their own hate speech campaign directed against Muslims as part of their electioneering.

Mr. Awid referred to the “ignorance” of top Conservative Party of Canada officials and their blanket targeting of Muslims generically as the “enemy” or as potential enemies. The inflaming and political exploitation of Islamophobia by the Canadian government’s reigning cabal is without a doubt wreaking havoc with the relative civil harmony that once characterized Canada before the election-fraud racketeers took charge in Ottawa.

Mr. Awid might have added that, by some calculations, about 4,000,000 Muslims have died so far from the so-called Global War on Terror, a psy-op fuelled by a toxic brew of hate speech disinformation.

Mr. Awid referred to the Tervor Aaronson’s The Terror Factory: Inside the FBI’s Manufactured War on Terror. That volume demonstrates that the FBI has played a major role in manufacturing and facilitating the very terrorism it claims to have pre-empted or solved. The manipulation of unstable individuals to provide the manufactured imagery of Islamic terrorism is the federal police force’s classic modus operandi.

As I have explained at length in an earlier article in Veterans Today, this type of manipulation by undercover agents in Canada (including the FBI?) probably formed the backstory to the shooting incident in Ottawa on Parliament Hill on October 22, 2014. This event was used to justify Bill C-51, now the Anti-Terrorism Act of 2015, which Rocco Galati and others have observed replicates much of the legislation supporting the fascist governments in Germany and Italy in the 1930s.

Screen Shot 2015-08-19 at 11.45.25 AM

As I wrote in “Witch Hunt on Terrorism,” my own article in We Are Not Charlie Hebdo: Free Thinkers Question the French 9/11, the Ottawa Shooting event of 10/22, (Oct. 22, 2014) initiated a series of apparent false flag events extending to Sydney Australia and then Paris France and then Copenhagen in Denmark.

The circulation of disinformation concerning such events to whip up anti-Muslim hysteria is itself hate speech of the most malicious kind giving sustenance to a kind of contemporary war against Islam whose major conceptual outlines can be traced back to the Jerusalem conference organized by Benjamin Netanyahu in 1979.

—-

Canadian Hate Squad cracks down on book talk by Kevin Barrett, Veterans Today Editor with Anthony Hall

vt-logo2015bbarrett

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2015/08/17/canadian-police/

Canadian Hate Squad cracks down on book talk

by Kevin Barrett, Veterans Today Editor, with Anthony Hall

August 17, 2015

Dr. Kevin Barrett, a Ph.D. Arabist-Islamologist, is one of America’s best-known critics of the War on Terror.

Edmonton, Alberta:-

The Edmonton Police Department’s  Hate Speech Squad has launched an investigation of a scholarly book that questions the War on Terror.

BANNED-IN-CANADA-427x640

On August 16th, two undercover EPD officers attended a book talk at the Rossdale Community League Hall in downtown Edmonton. The officers were investigating  We Are NOT Charlie Hebdo: Free Thinkers Question the French 9/11, which has apparently elicited complaints from B’nai Brith Canada.

Out of uniform and posing as ordinary audience members, the Hate Police officers watched my book talk.  During the intermission between my lecture and the subsequent presentation by University of Lethbridge professor Anthony Hall, the officers flashed their badges and identified themselves as members of the Hate Speech Squad. They said they had received a complaint referencing “conspiracy theories” and “anti-Semitism.” (How a scholarly book that includes essays by several highly accomplished and reputable Jewish contributors, as well as one by an even more Semitic Arab Muslim, can be called “anti-Semitic” is a mystery.)

The lead officer told me: “I didn’t see any problems with anything I heard during your lecture.” On behalf of the Department, he accepted an autographed copy of We Are NOT Charlie Hebdo dedicated “To the Edmonton Police Department Hate Speech Squad – thank you for thinking freely.” The officer said the book will be placed in the Departmental Library.

The Edmonton PD’s We Are NOT Charlie Hebdo investigation raises interesting questions. Are Canadian police departments now charged with giving a “thumbs up” or “thumbs down” to books and book talks? Are Hate Speech Squad officers getting training in literary criticism, investigative journalism and historiography so they can serve as competent peer reviewers and censors? Had the officers disapproved of the lecture, could they have arrested us? If they later read the book and dislike it, will it be banned in Canada? Conversely, if they like it, might they offer a blurb: “Terrific stuff! Certified 100% hate free by the Canadian hate police!”

But seriously, folks: Doesn’t the policing of books and book talks have a chilling effect on freedom of speech and academic freedom? And how and why did this particular book draw the attention of the Hate Police?

“The person who stated you were involved in hate crimes is Amanda Hohmann” emailed Joanne David, the Edmonton event organizer, to Anthony Hall. Amanda Hohmann is the Coordinator of the B’nai Brith Audit of Anti-Semitic Incidents.

Professor Hall was outraged: “They call themselves the B’nai Brith Audit of Anti-Semitism. Auditing! We live in an era of auditing fraud. The banksters are experts in disguising what’s going on through creative bookkeeping. It’s interesting that the concept of audit is now being applied to policing people’s ideas.”

So who was responsible for sending the Hate Police to our book talk? Anthony Hall was unable to get a straight answer:

“I called the B’nai Brith office but wasn’t able to speak to Amanda Hohmann. I asked to speak with CEO Michael Mofton and Senior Legal Counsel David Matas. I indicated it is a serious matter and that I have never been associated with a hate speech crime. So I want to know who complained, what is the nature of the complaint, is there  a text involved? It seems that someone said that our speaking was going to somehow be a violation of some hate speech principles. I wanted to know what the rules are, if there are any rules. Are people just free to snitch anonymously? Can people turn in their partner because they’re mad at him or her? It gets to the whole essence of the Global War on Terror, that people are subject to these repressions. They don’t know what they’re accused of, who is doing the accusing. There’s no due process. It’s an authoritarian police state atmosphere, an East German Stasi type of worldview. And this is creating maximum dissension, distrust and suspicion of one another. And this seems to be the agenda of neocon tyranny. Here we are right in the midst of an election. These issues are front and center. Bill C-51, now the Anti-Terrorism Act 2015, is like the Canadian Patriot Act. (Bill C-51 was passed in the wake of Canada’s 9/11, the Ottawa shooting of 10/22/2014.)

?ottawa-shooting-locations-620x330
The 10/22 false flag brought fascism to Canada

“The Anti-Terrorism Act empowers CSIS, the Canadian Security intelligence Service, to become a kind of Canadian gestapo. This raises the question: Is the B’nai Brith now an adjunct of CSIS? How are we to tell the difference between the B’nai Brith and the Harper government? And of course there’s so much irony, because the specious interpretations of 9/11, 10/22 (the Ottawa shooter event), the Charlie Hebdo event, and so on amount to hate speech! Their purpose is to generate hatred towards Muslims, and to whip up and instrumentalize and exploit Islamophobia for political gain to the neocons. So the agencies responsible for policing and arbitrating hate speech are deeply involved in generating a type of speech, and defending a type of speech, that creates great hatred towards Muslims.”

As of this writing, B’nai Brith has not returned Professor Hall’s phone calls asking for an explanation. Neither, for that matter, have the Edmonton Hate Police:

“I called the Edmonton Police Department. I couldn’t even find out the name of the officers. They gave me the phone number of the Hate Speech Unit. I called and left a message, but they haven’t gotten back to me.”

Richard Awid, manager of the Rossdale Community Center in Edmonton, said there had been several complaints asking him to cancel the event. The complaints were apparently vague and unsubstantiated. Awid, to his credit, stood his ground and allowed the book talk to proceed.

?IMG_0192-640x480
En route to Jasper with Anthony Hall

The Edmonton talk was the final episode of my five Canadian events with Anthony Hall. Two days earlier, our talk in Jasper was introduced by a forceful disclaimer disassociating the owner of the venue – the United Church of Canada – from the event.

Anthony Hall writes:
“This experience we went through in Jasper and especially in Edmonton seem to be a prelude to the kind of relationships  we can expect with the police, the government, and one another. This kind of thing is going to make the university as we’ve known it impossible. I can foresee security clearances for classes and Hate Police officers sitting in.”

In today’s Orwellian world, it seems that critical inquiry is being redefined as hate speech, radicalization, or even  terrorism.

The B’nai Brith Canada website states: “In the future, the League will explore further use of legal means to halt or disrupt the operations of known terrorist organizations with representatives in Canada. The B’nai Brith legal department will play a key role in this effort.”

Are scholarly books now considered a form of terrorism?

Anthony Hall adds: “I find it very troubling that there is this notion of ‘radicalization,’ that everyone just nods their heads assuming it means something. Are universities being defined as agents of radicalization, and professors considered their representatives?”

Hall adds: “The most extreme agent of radicalization in Canada right now is Stephen Harper and the cabal he represents. Imagine having a hate speech hotline when the Prime Minister is running on hate speech! The term he always uses (to incite hatred of Muslims) is ‘jihadism’.”

Fascism Comes to Canada: Stephen Harper One-Ups Leni Riefenstahl (watch this unbelievable video if you dare!)

Will anyone ever explain who sent the Hate Police to my book talk, and why? If those people made slanderous accusations, will they have to answer for them? Stay tuned to TruthJihad.com for updates.
—–

Egypt knew no Pharaohs nor Israelites (Book trailer) by Dr. Ashraf Ezzat, MD

Egypt3 Egypt1 Egypt4 Egypt11 Egypt12 Egypt13

Dr. Ashraf Ezzat, MD

Website: Pyramidion
 
Cell phone: 0201222719769
Amazon author page: amazon.com/author/ashrafezzat      
YouTube channel: Ashraf Ezzat’s channel
—–

 

New Zionist Party of Canada NZP (formerly known as the NDP) turfs another prospective candidate for Israel comment By Ryan Tumilty, MetroNews

http://www.metronews.ca/news/edmonton/2015/08/16/ndp-hopeful-protesting-disqualification-over-israel-comment-.html

Edmonton NDP hopeful to protest after being disqualified by Israel comments

Syed Hyder Ali said he was only repeating what Amnesty International has said about the country’s invasion of Gaza in 2014.

NZPSacrificeofSyedHyderAliPhoto

By: Ryan Tumilty Staff Reporter., Published on Sun Aug 16 2015

A prospective NDP candidate, who was turned down by the party for his views on Israel, is promising to protest at the party’s upcoming nomination meeting.

Syed Hyder Ali had hoped to run for the party in Edmonton Wetaskiwin, but after a long period of silence the party asked him to withdraw his name earlier this month. He said he refused and when he pushed to find out why the party didn’t want him they pointed to Facebook posts where he said the state of Israel was guilty of war crimes.

Ali said he was only repeating what Amnesty International has said about the country’s invasion of Gaza in 2014.

“These comments are not because I am a Muslim. They are because I am a human rights activist,” said Ali.

On his Facebook page he accused the party of being blind on the issue.

“NDP has been hijacked by pro-Israel mafia. It was New Democratic Party under leadership of Jack Layton, now it has become Non Democratic Party under leadership of Thomas Mulcair.”

He said he has been an ardent party supporter for years and doesn’t believe his views on one issue should prevent him from running.

“I believe in social democracy. I believe in the leadership of Jack Layton. I am in this party because of Jack Layton,” he said.

He is promising that supporters will protest the party’s nomination meeting in Leduc on Aug. 17.

He said Canada should be open to criticizing both sides of the conflict and not just one.

“Be just. Be neutral. Be democratic.”

He said he is well aware the Conservative campaign would have used his Facebook posts against him if he had been nominated as the candidate, but other parties dig into every candidate’s past to criticize them.

“Are they also going to throw Tom Mulcair out of a nomination race?”

——

More on Metronews.ca

Discourse on Voluntary Servitude by ÉTIENNE DE LA BOÉTIE, 1548

Screen Shot 2015-08-16 at 10.54.54 PM

http://www.radicalpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Discourse-on-Voluntary-Servitude-by-Etienne-del-la-Boetie-copy.pdf

No Room For Anti-Israeli Comment In Canadian Politics by Hadani Ditmars

No Room For Anti-Israeli Comment In Canadian Politics
by Hadani Ditmars, for RT
August 13, 2015
http://www.rt.com/op-edge/312334-canada-israel-wheeldon-politics/

Screen Shot 2015-08-15 at 9.26.51 PM

“When Harper needled him, NDP leader Thomas Mulcair responded that ‘Israel has no better friend than the NDP.’”

It would seem the height of Orwellian doublespeak to eliminate a political candidate for calling a war crime a war crime. And all the more so if you’re a leading member of Canada’s New Democratic Party.

And yet that’s exactly what happened this week when Nova Scotian Morgan Wheeldon, an NDP candidate for the riding of Kings-Hants, was forced to step down when a Conservative troll found a statement on his Facebook page from 2014 calling Israel’s bombardment of Gaza a “war crime.”

I suppose that party brass doesn’t read much Orwell, or UN reports on actual Israeli war crimes in Gaza – but perhaps it should become required reading. Especially if you set yourself up as the main ‘progressive’ opponent to the ruling Conservative Party, whose leader Stephen Harper carries on what is surely the creepiest political ‘bromance’ with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu bar none.

And yet in last week’s televised leaders debates it was clear that while the two parties differ on the controversial Harper backed C-51 ‘anti-terror legislation’ the NDP and the Conservatives were duking it out for the pro-Israel vote. When Harper needled him, NDP leader Thomas Mulcair responded that “Israel has no better friend than the NDP.” It seems he was correct.

The damning out-of-context statement on Wheeldon’s Facebook page in the wake of Israel’s 2014 bombing of Gaza that killed over 2,200 Palestinians was this:

“One could argue that Israel’s intention was always to ethnically cleanse the region — there are direct quotations proving this to be the case. Guess we just sweep that under the rug. A minority of Palestinians are bombing buses in response to what appears to be a calculated effort to commit a war crime.”

While the UN itself has accused Israel of war crimes during ‘Operation Protective Edge’, the NDP cried foul, stating: “Our position on the conflict in the Middle East is clear, as Tom Mulcair expressed clearly in the debate. Mr. Wheeldon’s comments are not in line with that policy and he is no longer our candidate.”

So that’s that then. Call a war crime a war crime on your personal Facebook page, and there’s no room for you in Canada’s ‘progressive’ party.

What has happened to Canada, and for that matter to the NDP? Their take-no-prisoners approach to criticism of Israeli actions in Gaza and the West Bank has recent precedents, and they all lead back to Thomas Mulcair.

In 2008, Mulcair led a caucus revolt against then leader Jack Layton when he criticized the Harper government’s decision not to participate in the United Nations Conference on Racism on the grounds that its mention of certain Israeli violations of international law was ‘anti-Semitic’.

Mulcair successfully muzzled NDP criticism of the January 2009 Israeli bombardment of Gaza, which killed 1,400 civilians, as well as the subsequent Israeli attack on the Gaza Flotilla, which killed nine.

And in 2010, Mulcair joined forces with the Conservatives and the Liberals in calling for the ouster of long time MP Libby Davies, (who has since resigned from politics) as NDP House Leader after her comments to a journalist that occupation of Palestine had begun in 1948.

While the NDP’s position is more than apparent to keen observers (as author Yves Engler notes, even NDP pioneer Tommy Douglas was an ardent Zionist), it’s odd that Israel has suddenly become an election issue in Canada in the midst of recessionary times.
Is freedom of speech completely dead in Canada? Can no one criticize Israeli war crimes without fear of repercussions?

It would seem that only Elizabeth May, leader of the tiny but scrappy Green Party, is free to speak her mind on foreign policy issues. Her candid comments have helped the Green Party usurp the NDP’s former role of ‘unofficial opposition’ to the ruling Conservatives. And indeed, after Paul Manly was barred from running for the NDP on the grounds that his comments about Israel incarcerating his aging father John Manly (captured with other crew members of a ship bearing aid to besieged Gaza) were of concern to the party executive, he joined the Green Party.

The general mood of muzzling any dissent against Israel would seem at odds with Canada’s allies. Comparing the situation here to say that of the UK – where Labour MP’s were asked to vote in favor of a Palestinian state, the prime minister was forced (via growing public opposition) to resign as patron of the Jewish National Fund and Senior Foreign Office Minister Baroness Sayeeda Warsi chose to resign over the government’s policy on Gaza – makes Canada look backward at best.

In an international context, it would now appear that Canada has the least control of any G7 country over its own foreign policy. Perhaps even less than in the US where tax dollars go more directly to maintaining the Israeli occupation of Palestine. Bizarrely, no matter who wins the upcoming election, Canada’s Middle East policy now seems to be firmly based on Likudist agendas.

—-
Hadani Ditmars, for RT
Hadani Ditmars has been reporting from Iraq since 1997 and is the author of Dancing in the No Fly Zone. Her next book Ancient Heart is a political travelogue of historical sites in Iraq.www.hadaniditmars.com

The Canadian Banking System: Debt Servitude I By Betty Krawczyk

li-supreme-court-canada-004

The Canadian Banking System: Debt Servitude I  

By

Betty Krawczyk

Betty K Photo copy

Please click on THIS LINK to watch Part 5 of my video series on the Canadian Banking System. Please also read accompanying text below.

Our Politicians and What they Know

The IMF? Bank of Canada? Our major politicians obviously have never heard of them. At least it didn’t come up in the debates. No, the major thing that came out of the first national leader’s debate was that Tom Mulcair got Harper to admit that a recession actually existed. Or, kind of, as Harper seemed to take it back later.

Sure, all three opposition parties said some good things. However, in my opinion, few of these good things will come to pass even if elected unless our Bank of Canada is rescued from the international bankers. And I doubt that even Elizabeth May will speak out about this, although she is very knowledgeable.

But why would she not speak out? Politicians like Elizabeth May, who are rare, and who want to serve the people, may underestimate the capacity of the Canadian public to listen and understand relatively complex issues. This banking issue is the most important issue before us, as the droughts, the burning and flooding of our lands, and the non-stop global killer winds won’t lessen in any meaningful way until we get freed from the private bankers’ stranglehold.

This tiny group of people sit atop a pyramid of misery for increasing numbers of the world’s population and they are powerful. How did they get so powerful? Compound interest. On everything they touch. I mentioned last time that I would tell you about a recent ruling brought before the courts by a group called COMER. COMER (Committee for Monetary and Economic Reform) has turned to the courts for help in trying to overturn Pierre Trudeau’s decision in 1974 to turn over our Bank of Canada to the private banks. The first judge to hear COMER’S case characterized the claims as follows and were reiterated by Mr. Justice Russell in April, 2014 in federal court:

1.The Bank and Crown refuse to provide interest free loans for capital expenditures;

2.The Crown uses flawed accounting methods in describing public finances, which provides the rational for refusing to grant interest-free loans, and

3.These and other harms are caused by the Bank being controlled by private foreign interests. (my italics) date:20140424, Neutral citation 2014 FC 380, file numbers T-2010-11

The first judge struck down COMER’S claims, but Mr. Justice Russell saw it differently on appeal and ordered: (para 76 same hearing) “So, as regards the declaratory relief sought in this Claim, it is my view that the matters raised could be justiciable and appropriate for consideration by the Court…There is a difference between the Court declaring that the Government or the Governor, or the Minister, should pursue a particular policy and a declaration as to whether the policies they have pursued are compliant with the Bank of Canada and the Constitution. The facts are pleaded on these issues. Subject to what I have to say about other aspects of the Claim, the Plaintiffs should be allowed to go forward, call their evidence and attempt to make their case.”

So wow. The Bank of Canada is in court, fighting for its life, for the right to go back to serving the people. More next time.

Betty Krawczyk betty.krawczyk@gmail.com

 

©2015 Betty K | Blog: http://bettysearlyedition.blogspot.com Books: www.schiverrhodespublishing.com Tumblr: http://www.tumblr.com/blog/motherright

BC HATE CRIME TEAM Det.Cst. Terry Wilson Pulls Disappearing Act By Arthur Topham

WilsonResignsHdr

BC HATE CRIME TEAM Det.Cst. Terry Wilson Pulls Disappearing Act  

By Arthur Topham

I recently learned from an associate that Det. Cst. Terry Wilson, Chief Investigator for the BRITISH COLUMBIA HATE CRIME TEAM located in Surrey, B.C. has suddenly “retired” from the RCMP.

Former Det. Wilson was the head cop responsible for flying his Hate Crime Team up to Quesnel, B.C. and then, with the assistance of the local RCMP, stopping me and my wife on the Barkerville Hwy while traveling to Prince George on business on the morning of May 16th, 2012 and then arresting me on a trumped up Sec. 319(2) “Hate Crime” charge and tossing me in the Quesnel jail.

TOOMUCHTOTHINK!

While I was locked up he and his partner Cst. Normandie Levas then proceeded to gain an illegal search warrant from some flunky judge down on the coast and then entered my home and stole all of my computers and electronic files.

BBTRAITORS

When I was released just before midnight from confinement I was given an order not to post anything on the internet. Since that infamous day, 1181 more days have passed, first battling with the B.C. provincial court system and now with the BC Supreme Court in order to defend my name and my Constitutional right to publish news and opinions on my legitimate sole proprietor business website RadicalPress.com as well as stop the legal system from possibly sentencing me to two more years in jail should I be found guilty of this spurious, politically motived “crime” initiated by the Jewish lobby group B’nai Brith Canada a secretive, Jews-only Freemason society.

The first question that sprung to my mind when I heard of Det. Wilson’s disappearance from the force was did he leave intentionally in order to somehow avoid having to appear in court when the trial commences this October 26th here in Quesnel and thus escape being cross-examined for his part in this whole disgusting charade that has been ongoing since November of 2007?

Or could it have been due to the fact that Wilson and his “HATE CRIME TEAM” have been wasting HUGE amounts of taxpayer’s money for years trying to catch Canadians who are merely exercising the constitutional right to free expression on  the internet and NEVER gaining a conviction over the time and money spent on this frivolous and malicious enterprise of censorship on the part of the Zionist Jew lobby in Canada?

terry-loves-donuts-2 copy

Whatever the reason this traitor to Canada and sycophant for the Zionist lobby is a disgrace to the country. Having stole years and years of private email communications when they removed all of my computers Wilson then proceeded to snoop about through the hundreds of thousands of private communications like some voyeur trying to find out who I’ve been exchanging my private thought and ideas with since 2006 at the earliest. Whenever I think about this sonofasatan going through all of my private email it burns my ass knowing that what he was doing was unethical, immoral and down right criminal. In fact there is a 5-year jail sentence for people like Wilson and Levas who pull this sort of shit on citizens that still awaits redress.

So this is how our justice system works in Canada these days. The Zionist lobby creates these phoney Commie style spy organizations and portrays them to the public as defenders of human rights and commissars of “hate speech” and then wastes millions of dollars of taxpayer’s hard-earned money threatening, abusing, arresting and charging people like myself for publishing news articles and opinions that the Jewish media intentionally hides and/or distorts from the public in order to cover their own asses and their own obnoxious and nefarious agenda.

Wilson will appear at my trial to justify his actions come hell or high water and justice WILL prevail.

 

Is NDP Thomas Mulcair a Shabbas Goy/Trojan Horse working for Israel? Ian V. Macdonald Letter to National Zionist Post

Let2NatPostIanVM

WAKEUPCANADA!

HP – for a long time I sensed that Mulcair was a Shabbas Goy/Trojan Horse and warned the NDP that, if so, he would subtly undermine the integrity, independence, and election prospects of the Party, but unfortunately. to no avail. I didn’t expect he would out himself as an Israeli sychophant before the election but I suppose he simply followed his sensitive paymasters’ instructions (probably urged on by his wife, rumored to be a Jewess) to nip even the slightest sign of “anti-Semitism” in the bud . Penalizing a good Christian Canadian for condemning Israel – already condemned by the United Nations for her countless atrocities and mega-criminality more than any other country – should be sufficient grounds to disqualify the offender from any public office in Canada, let alone a leadership position. Mulcair would do himself, his Party and his country a favour if he apologized to the righteous Morgan Wheeldon, and resigned. IV

August 11, 2015

Editor
NATIONAL POST
Toronto

Dear Sir,

“Stephen Harper with a beard”

Mr Mulcair, who has been promising “change”, has damaged his credibility perhaps beyond recall, by allowing policy advisor Brad Levine to fire Morgan Wheeldon, one of the NDP’s most loyal and enthusiastic candidates, whose loyalty to Israel, had become suspect.

By condoning this shameless racist act, Mr Mulcair may well have ingratiated himself with the Jewish paymasters of his leadership campaign, but he will have offended and alienated, and probably lost, all the fair minded voters who have been appalled by Prime Minister Harper’s costly, demeaning love affair with the criminal apartheid state that has destroyed Canada’s formerly sterling image in international affairs and jeopardized our security.

Since Morgan Wheeldon, is a worthy citizen, has waged an effective campaign, and time is running out, the only course now for Mr Mulcair is to withdraw the NDP from Kings-Hants and encourage Mr Wheeldon to run as an Independent. Assuming both are elected, he should then seek his former candidate’s cooperation and forgiveness. Unfortunately, now that Mulcair has shown his true colours as an Israel-Firster, the reconciliation would not likely take place while serving within the ranks of the governing party.

As ever,

Ian V. Macdonald
Ottawa ON 
IanV Macdonald IanVMacdonald@aol.com

Regina v Radical Press Legal Update # 24

NEWERESTLegalUpdateLogo-700

notice4RP

RPEdNew300 copy

Regina v Radical Press Legal Update # 24
August 8th, 2015

Dear Free Speech Defenders and Radical Press Supporters,

A considerable amount of time has lapses since the previous Legal Update that appeared back on April 17th, 2015. There were plans to update my legal situation after the next court appearance but due to urgent family matters I was unable to do so. May and June were consumed with caring for my brother who was dying of cancer and that was a major contributing factor in not publishing anything further. As a result this update will be somewhat lengthy in order to cover the essentials.

Just to recap, the April 17th court appearance and all the subsequent appearances since then were the result of my attempt to have the BC Supreme Court address the following Charter issues surrounding the case and in so doing circumvent the unnecessary cost and time to taxpayers and the courts by attempting to hold this mock “hate speech” trial in October of 2015:

As the Applicant the Issues that I wanted raised and which were included in my Memorandum of Argument are as follows:

• Section 319(2) of the Criminal Code constitutes an infringement of Section 2(b) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

• The Crown bears the onus of justifying the infringement of Charter rights on a case-by-case basis.

• The present case is distinguishable from Keegstra on its facts.

• The infringement of Section 2(b) of the Charter is not reasonably justified by Section 1 in the circumstances of this case, and specifically:

The “pressing and substantial objective” of legislation must be defined narrowly for the purpose of a Section 1 analysis.

• The use of Section 319(2) in this case is not rationally connected to the pressing and substantial objective of preventing harms associated with hate propaganda.

• Criminal prosecution by indictment is not a minimal impairment of the Applicant’s Charter rights.

• The infringement of the Applicant’s Charter rights is disproportionate to any possible salutary effect that Section 319(2) could have in the circumstances of this case.

• The appropriate remedy is to read into the law a constitutional exemption, to the effect that Section 319(2) is not a reasonable limit on Section 2(b) in circumstances where the allegedly hateful material is legal to possess and lawfully available from other sources.
My Argument is as follows:

Section 319(2) of the Criminal Code constitutes an infringement of Section 2(b) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms:

Section 319(2) of the Criminal Code reads as follows:

“(2) Every one who, by communicating statements, other than in private conversation, wilfully promotes hatred against any identifiable group is guilty of

(a) an indictable offence and is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years; or

(b) an offence punishable on summary conviction.”

Section 2(b) of the Charter protects the right to freedom of expression, a “fundamental freedom” enjoyed by all Canadians:

“Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms: …

(b) freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication …”

The issue of Det. Terry Wilson (the Arresting Officer) having obtained an illegal search warrant and then entering my home and stealing all of my computers and electronic files as well as all of my hundreds of thousand of emails was brought up in my Memorandum of Argument.

As I stated it:

“Whether or not the Applicant’s personal emails are being introduced into evidence, the fact that personal emails were accessed must be considered in regard to the issue of minimal impairment. Detective Wilson’s own evidence is that he and his colleagues accessed information which was outside the scope of the search warrant.

The search of the Applicant’s computers did not give rise to any incriminating evidence. Nevertheless, the search of the Applicant’s personal emails was an overbroad and “intrusive invasion of privacy.” This must be taken into account with regard to minimal impairment.

Performing an overbroad search of an individual’s personal computer in support of an application for an “overbroad prior restraint” on that individual’s right to freedom of expression is not a minimal impairment of Charter rights.

The infringement of the Applicant’s Charter rights is disproportionate to any possible salutary effect that Section 319(2) could have in the circumstances of this case:

Aside from a “point of principle” against offensive speech, the application of Section 319(2) in the present case has no possible salutary effects. The removal from one website of alleged hate propaganda which is legal to possess and lawfully accessible from dozens of other websites does not constitute a salutary effect.

On the other hand, a conviction under Section 319(2) would have a devastating effect upon the Applicant’s Charter right to freedom of expression. Furthermore, it would constitute an endorsement by the court of a breach of the Applicant’s most basic privacy interests.
In all of the circumstances, it will be respectfully submitted that the infringement upon the Charter-protected interests of the accused is grossly disproportionate to any possible salutary effect of this ongoing prosecution.

The Order Sought reads as follows:

Section 52(1) of the Constitution Act, 1982 reads as follows:

“52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is inconsistent with the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of no force or effect.”

After citing R. v. Sharpe in support of Section 52(1) the Applicant respectfully requested an order as follows:

A declaration that Section 319(2) of the Criminal Code constitutes an infringement of Section 2(b) of the Charter, as already established in R. v. Keegstra.

A declaration, pursuant to Section 52(1) of the Constitution Act, 1982, that Section 319(2) of the Criminal Code is not reasonably justified by Section 1 of the Charter in circumstances where the allegedly hateful material is legal to possess and lawfully available from other sources.

For the full text of the Memorandum of Argument please go here and read it in pdf format.

From the get go the Crown did not want to have these Charter issues argued prior to the trial and in order to accomplish that objective the Attorney General’s office in Victoria, B.C. assigned Rodney G. Garson, a special Crown Prosecutor out of their Prosecution Support Unit within the Crown Law Division of the Ministry of Justice to act as Counsel for the Respondent (i.e. The Queen of England).

In my own case I was able to raise enough funding to hire Barclay W. Johnson, also from Victoria (and former partner with my initial lawyer Douglas Christie who passed away on March 11th, 2013), on a limited retainer to act on my behalf with respect to my Application.

Stepping back a bit my wife and I attended another court appearance in Quesnel on June 10th, 2015, again to deal with the Charter question. It was unattended by Crown and I was hooked up via telephone with in the court room with S.C. Justice Butler, Crown Prosecutor Rodney G. Garson and my counsel Barclay W. Johnson. After some bantering about it was decided that the three of them would meet again in the flesh on June 22nd, 2015 in the B.C. Supreme Court in Vancouver to present final arguments. At the time of this arrangement it was agreed that I would be able to attend via telephone from Quesnel rather than make the costly trip to Vancouver.

Three days later I had to return to North Vancouver in order to attend to my brother and ended up staying down on the coast until the June 22nd hearing. At first my counsel wasn’t able to gain permission from the Vancouver court registry for me to attend the hearing! They told Barclay Johnson that there wasn’t “enough room” in the courthouse. (?) Eventually I was able to attend and entered the law courts just after 10 a.m. on the morning of Monday, June 22nd.

Walking around the building at 800 Smythe Street looking for Court Room #55 on the 5th floor I was reflecting back thirteen years to the last time I was in that architectural wonder of Arthur C. Erickson’s. It was the year 2002 and I was appearing on my own behalf to argue against an attempt by the then NDP government to gain an interlocutory injunction against my monthly newspaper The Radical. I had been publishing articles exposing alleged wrong-doings by the NDP Minister of Children and Families, Edward John; serious allegations of pedophilia and child abductions within the Ministry of Children and Families and the Attorney-General’s office.

SLAPP-STICKVOL3#9RADICAL copy

Ed John did get his injunction but the libel charge ended up being dropped some years later when John assumed the role of Grand Chief Ed John of the First Nations Summit and didn’t want any adverse publicity linking him to the former allegations. If one googles John you will find no mention of his former connections with the NDP in his official bio.

But my special relationship with Vancouver’s Supreme Courthouse(s) goes back further even than 2002. Much further. Back to the turbulent days of the latter half of the 1960’s in fact when my career as a political activist and writer first began.

It was on Saturday, March 8th, 1968 when a group of us Hippies were gathered at the old Vancouver court house on West Georgia Street that the Mayor of Vancouver, Tom Campbell, sent the “fuzz” (the police) to harass and intimidate us into leaving the area or else face mass arrest using bogus “John Doe” warrants. I was one of those who refused to be intimidated and was subsequently arrested and charged with “loitering”. The following article from the Vancouver Sun tells the sordid tale of that day.

1968Arrest1

1968Arrest2

1968Arrest3

1968Arrest4 copy

In 1968 Mayor Tom Campbell was calling Hippies “parasites” and “scum” and other hateful words but we never ever considered charging him with a Sec. 319(2) “hate crime” offence. There is an excellent 6 minute CBC interview with former Vancouver Mayor Campbell that I discovered while putting together this update which I’m sure many of the older readers would enjoy watching. It took place at the old Vancouver courthouse fountain on the 18th of March not long after the big arrest.

MayorCampbell 1968

(And yes, one of the other “Hippies” arrested that same day was Udo Erasmus, now known in the alternative medicine community for his famous “Udo’s Oils”. Another of those “lowlife scum” who’s contributed immensely to improving the health of future generations.)

Getting back to the present the hearing commenced at 10:50 a.m. with Justice Butler, Prosecutor Garson, Counsel Johnson, Johnson’s legal assistant Jeremy Maddock and myself in attendance. The courtroom was large with seating for likely 50+ and more but was empty.

Barclay Johnson spoke first and gave an overview of the case citing the main points mentioned above and also arguing that Crown doesn’t have solid evidence to warrant going to trial and wasting taxpayer’s money and precious court time that would be better used for serious cases. He also voiced the position that my case was politically motivated.

When the Crown Prosecutor Garson’s turn came to speak he made a point of registering a formal objection to Justice Morgan regarding Barclay Johnson’s assertion that the case was politically motivated, assuming what I felt was feigned righteous indignation on the part of the Attorney General’s office.

Garson then launched into his argument with the following Introduction:

1. The applicant, Roy Arthur Topham, is charged with the criminal offence of willfully promoting hatred against an identifiable group, contrary to s. 319(2) of the Criminal Code.

2. In defending himself against that charge, he has filed a notice of application under the Constitutional Question Act, [RSBC 1996] c. 68. The application challenges the constitutionality of s. 319(2), despite the provision being found to be constitutionally valid by the Supreme Court of Canada in R. v. Keegstra, [1990] 3 S.C.R. 697.

3. At the last pre-trial conference in relation to this case, this Court directed that a hearing be held in relation to a single threshold issue. That issue is a simple one in that it relates to the binding effect of the Keegstra decision, and in particular that portion of the majority decision which ruled that the s. 2(b) Charter violation engendered by s. 319(2) of the Criminal Code was justified under section 1 of the Charter.

4. The applicant says that the Supreme Court of Canada’s ruling on the constitutionality of s. 319(2) of the Criminal Code in Keegstra is only partially binding. According to the applicant, every Canadian court is bound by its legal conclusion that s. 319(2) of the Criminal Code violates the freedom of expression guarantee in s. 2(b) of the Charter. But no Canadian court is bound by its legal conclusion that the violation is justified by s. 1 of the Charter. Consequently, the applicant argues that the Crown must justify the legislation on a “case-by-case” basis, every time a person is charged with and prosecuted for an offence contrary to s. 319(2) of the Code.

5. The Crown submits that the applicant’s argument is entirely without merit. Not only is the argument without any support in the jurisprudence, the Supreme Court of Canada has expressly set out the conditions under which a trial court may revisit Charter rulings of the Supreme Court that would otherwise be binding. The onus to satisfy a trial court that this threshold has been established is clearly on the Charter claimant.

The full text of RESPONDENT CROWN’S SUBMISSIONS ON THRESHOLD ISSUE CONCERNING CHARTER S. 1 JUSTIFICATION AND R. v. KEEGSTRA, [1990] 3 S.C.R. 697 can be viewed here.

After Crown’s presentation and concluding arguments by both parties Court recessed for lunch but just prior to doing so Barclay Johnson handed Crown Prosecutor Garson a copy of the Applicant’s Reply to Crown’s arguments. When he did so Prosecutor Garson nearly lost it and again protested loudly to Justice Butler that it was outrageous for Barclay to hand him my reply at such a late date in the proceedings.

I thought it was rather disingenuous of Crown to again feign such outrage given the fact that, in my own experience with court, it’s always been par for the course for Crown to hand me documents just prior to a session commencing and think nothing of it. Apart from that Counsel Garson himself had not furnished my Counsel with his Argument on the date he had committed to doing so and only sent the document to Johnson on the day prior to him having to leave Victoria to attend the hearing in Vancouver.

After Garson’s rant Justice Butler said that we would return at 2:00 p.m. after taking lunch and that would give Crown an opportunity to look at my reply and respond to it. That is what then transpired.

When the hearing ended Justice Butler informed everyone that he would be reserving his judgement and would inform both Crown and my Counsel in the most timely manner possible.

Again, on a personal note, the hearing itself was beneficial for me in the sense that I finally had the opportunity to meet up in person with both my Counsel Barclay Johnson and his Legal Assistant Jeremy Maddock since my arrest on this spurious Sec. 319(2) offence back in May of 2012. Prior to then my only face to face meetings had been with my former lawyer Douglas Christie.

This was the last court appearance to date.

On July 8, 2015 Justice Butler issued his Reasons for Judgment which concluded with the following:

Ruling

[11] The proper approach when considering a motion to quash an indictment on grounds of constitutional validity is set out in R. v. DeSousa, [1992] 2 S.C.R. 944. While the defence has not brought a motion to quash, the relief it is seeking invites the court to make a finding on constitutional questions which would have the same effect as a motion to quash. Accordingly, the principles in DeSousa are instructive in this matter. In DeSousa, at 954, Sopinka J. affirmed the discretion of a trial judge to rule on a pre-trial motion before trial or at the conclusion of the trial. The discretion is to be exercised with regard to two policy considerations:

… The first is that criminal proceedings should not be fragmented by interlocutory proceedings which take on a life of their own. This policy is the basis of the rule against interlocutory appeals in criminal matters. See Mills v. The Queen… The second, which relates to constitutional challenges, discourages adjudication of constitutional issues without a factual foundation. See, for instance, Moysa v. Alberta (Labour Relations Board)… and Danson v. Ontario (Attorney General)… Both these policies favour disposition of applications at the end of the case. In exercising the discretion to which I have referred the trial judge should not depart from these policies unless there is a strong reason for so doing.

[12] The Court went on to identify those circumstances where there might be a compelling reason for the court to rule on such an application before trial. The only circumstance which could apply to the present case is described as follows at 955:

… Moreover, in some cases it will save time to decide constitutional questions before proceeding to trial on the evidence. An apparently meritorious Charter challenge of the law under which the accused is charged which is not dependent on facts to be elicited during the trial may come within this exception to the general rule.

[13] I will deal with the second policy consideration first; constitutional questions should not be adjudicated without a factual foundation. The defence argument regarding the constitutionality of s. 319(2) is clearly not a challenge to the “law under which the accused is charged which is not dependant on facts to be elicited during trial”. The defence says that the facts of this case are different from those in Keegstra, and it is that difference which gives rise to its argument. In these circumstances, the determination of the question should await trial and the findings of fact.

[14] The first policy consideration, which militates against the fragmentation of criminal proceedings, is also relevant here. There are two reasons for not fragmenting the process by hearing a constitutional challenge before trial. First, there might be no reason to consider the issue as the accused might be acquitted on some other basis. Second, the fragmentation can lead to multiple appeals and longer proceedings. An extreme example of this occurred in R. v. Martin (1991), 2 O.R. (3d) 16, affirmed [1992] 1 S.C.R. 838 and R. v. Martin, [1994] O.J. No. 1161, 1994 CanLII 225 (C.A.). The trial judge twice acquitted the accused on pre-trial motions challenging the constitutionality of provisions under the federal Export and Import Permits Act. On both occasions the Court of Appeal overturned the acquittal and sent it back for rehearing. On both occasions the court noted that it was inadvisable for the trial judge to consider and grant judgment on a pre-trial application to enforce a remedy under the Charter. The comments of Griffiths J.A. at 29 of the first appeal were quoted with approval by Finlayson J.A. in the second appeal, at para. 10:

… At the opening of this appeal, all members of the court expressed their concern about the propriety of the lower court judge dealing with a challenge to the constitutionality of s. 13 of the Act, on a pre-motion hearing, before any plea had been entered or any evidence adduced. In my view, the court should not, at this early stage, entertain or dispose of an application to enforce a remedy under the Charter, except in those cases where it is abundantly clear that a constitutional right has been infringed or threatened. In my opinion, this case does not fall into that category and it would have been preferable for the trial judge to decline to enter into the constitutional issue at the stage of a pre-trial motion and to leave such issue to be raised by the appellant by way of defence at the conclusion of the evidence at trial. It is, of course, quite possible that the appellant might have succeeded on some other line of defence at trial, rendering the Charter challenge entirely moot.

[15] As I have indicated, both policy considerations outlined above are relevant here, and both favour disposition of the constitutional issue at the end of the trial. I do not see any reason to attempt to adjudicate the issue raised by the defence before trial. It may be that the accused will be acquitted for reasons which are unrelated to the constitutionality of s. 319(2) of the Criminal Code. If that does not happen, the court will require a factual foundation on which to consider the arguments of the defence. The efficient use of court time does not militate in favour of taking a fragmented approach to the issues raised by this case.

[16] When I determined that I should hear argument on this matter in a pre-trial application, I was concerned that the position taken by the defence might require a ruling as to the admissibility of evidence which should be considered before the jury is empanelled. Having heard the arguments of counsel, no such issue is before the court. The Crown will have to decide in the usual course what evidence to put before the court to attempt to prove the charges. There is no application before me to find that certain evidence or any category of evidence is inadmissible.

[17] Finally, I note that counsel have raised a number of issues regarding the charge under s. 319(2). As I have indicated, the arguments advanced concerned the constitutionality of that section, the application of s. 1 of the Charter, the nature of the onus under s. 1, and the kind of evidence required by the Crown to prove the offence. Given the conclusions outlined above, I will not comment on these arguments.

[18] Accordingly, the defence application is dismissed.

“Butler J.”

The decision by Justice Butler to not “attempt to adjudicate the issue raised by the defence before trial” did not come as a great surprise to me and quite frankly did not produce any great measure of remorse knowing that now, barring any unforeseen and extraordinary circumstances, the trial would definitely be a go this coming fall. The only other event that could possibly have had a bearing on the actual date set was the additional matter of my lack of funding and the necessity for me to once again apply for a Rowbotham application a second time. That matter too has now been resolved.

Mr. Rowbotham and Legal Aid

As mentioned earlier my fundraising efforts to date were not sufficient to hire counsel for both the Constitutional challenge and the actual trial. What money was raised by donations went to cover the expense of hiring Barclay Johnson to address the pre-trial Charter application. Knowing that should the case proceed to trial I would have to re-apply once again for a Rowbotham application meant that I first had to apply to the regional Legal Aid office here in Quesnel in the area where I live. Rather than wait until the application was heard I made an appointment with Legal Aid in Quesnel and attended on June 4th, 2015. After the intake worker looked at my documents which showed that I was getting a whoppingly huge pension of $1684.34 which was for both myself and my wife plus the donations which had come in over the previous five months she informed me that I was over the threshold and that I did not qualify financially and therefore was refused.

My next step was to then write to the Provincial Supervisor at the head office for Legal Aid in Vancouver and appeal the local decision. If I was refused a second time by head office then I could file an application to the B.C. Attorney General’s office for a Rothbotham application. On June 7, 2015 I sent a letter via Canada Post to Legal Aid in Vancouver requesting that they reconsider my request.

The letter was long, blunt and to the point. I will include only two paragraphs from it here; ones which I felt were vital for head office to consider:

“Even with the amount of donations now sporadically coming to me I am only able to cover my basic living expenses and the cost of maintaining my website and keeping food on the table and utilities covered and put a little aside to pay for paralegal advice. To actually assume that a qualified criminal lawyer who knows the ins and outs of Canada’s infamous “hate speech” laws can be hired to deal with my case and win it based upon my present income transcends all logic and common sense and it doesn’t take a legal wizard or even a financial wizard to figure out.

The case of R v Roy Arthur Topham is a precedent setting one that will affect countless other publishers, bloggers, journalists, writers across the spectrum of Canadian media, both mainstream and alternative, and YOU expect that I ought to be able to easily come up with the funds necessary to hire professional counsel to deal with this important case – one that endangers the country as a whole in terms of a citizen’s basic right to freedom of speech – based upon the meager amount of donations that I must add to my less than meager old age pension cheque?”

I fully expected to receive a final refusal within the next three weeks to a month as was the case in my first application back in 2013. The weeks passed and I was preoccupied with caring for my brother and then dealing with all the contingencies that accompany death in the family and it wasn’t until I had to return to North Vancouver at the end of July that I decided to go directly to the downtown office on Burrard Street and enquire about my June 7, 2015 letter. I was able to talk to a receptionist who arranged for me to speak with an Intake Legal Assistant. When I asked about the letter I was told that I didn’t receive a reply because the “system” was undergoing some major changes (mainly computer oriented programs) and everything had slowed down considerably. I was asked if I had my documentation with me regarding my income, etc. and I informed the person that I had only come to find out about my letter and all my documents were back at home. They then opened up a new file for me and I was to send them certain documents when I got back to Quesnel. The August 1st long weekend was approaching and I told the Legal Assistant that I would be home on the weekend and send the required documents to his office on Tuesday, August 4, 2015.

On Friday, August 7, 2015 I called the person I had been dealing with to inquire whether he had received the information and he said he had and that a decision would be made by the end of the day. Within a couple of hours of speaking with the Intake Assistant I received an email from him stating, “I have approved your application for legal aid and sent a contract to Mr. Barclay Johnson as per your request.”

I immediately wrote back saying, “God bless you!”

Conclusion

Now that a trial is certain and I have been able to secure funding from Legal Aid to assist me in hiring counsel the remaining time from this point to the October 26th trial date will be a busy time spent in preparing for the grand event. There is still much to do.

A last word on funding. Although Legal Aid has been granted in this case it needs to be stressed that funding for all of the contingencies leading up to the trial will still be required in order to cover a number of costs associated with preparation. As a result I will continue to solicit for financial help over the next three months.

Donations can be made online via my GoGetFunding site located at http://gogetfunding.com/canadian-publisher-faces-jail-for-political-writings/ or else by sending cash, cheques or Money Orders to the following postal address. Please make sure that any cheques or Money Orders are made out to – Arthur Topham – and sent to:

Arthur Topham
4633 Barkerville Highway
Quesnel, B.C.
V2J 6T8

 

 

Holocaustianity on the march By Brandon Martinez (Non-Aligned Media NAM)

HolocaustHdr4MartinezArtFin

Holocaustianity on the march

By Brandon Martinez

Non-Aligned Media (August 6, 2015)

Brandon MartinezImage

When perusing YouTube last night, I came across a curious episode of the BBC debate show “The Big Questions.” The topic of this one was “Is it time to lay the Holocaust to rest?” It featured a coterie of Zionist Jews on one end and a dilapidated kosher-opposition on the other who shuddered in fear of the aggressive, hubristic Judeo-Nazis arguing that the “Holocaust” should be memorialized and commemorated until the end of time. To those in-the-know on the Jewish question, this show will inevitably produce one of two effects: it will either make you vomit out of disgust at the insane narcissism of the Jewish participants, or it will cause you to seethe with anger that such obviously demented people are given such a prominent voice in the media to promote their toxic supremacist viewpoints.

The Jewish panelists on the show endeavored to convince everyone that the “Holocaust” is a “unique” and “exceptional” event in history that has no equivalents. This claim is erroneous because all major historical events have some unique elements to them, so the same could be said about the Rwandan genocide, the Armenian genocide, Soviet-Communist atrocities, the Israeli-sponsored slow motion genocide of the Palestinians and other outrages. Despite their protestations to the contrary, those Jews who advance the alleged uniqueness and exceptionality of the Holocaust do so not because it was such in practice, but because they view its victims as unique and exceptional; they are, in essence, Jewish supremacists who believe Jewish casualties carry more weight than others, that Jewish blood has more worth than the blood of non-Jews. They pathetically tried to eschew such allegations on the BBC show, but their ethno-supremacist inferences are plain and obvious to those who can decipher Talmudic doublespeak. The former head of the Zionist-oriented Anti-Defamation League, Abraham Foxman, perfectly encapsulated this Judeo-supremacist notion when he said:

“The Holocaust is something different. It is a singular event. It is not simply one example of genocide but a near successful attempt on the life of God’s chosen children and, thus, on God Himself. It is an event that is the antithesis of Creation as recorded in the Bible; and like its direct opposite, which is relived weekly with the Sabbath and yearly with the Torah, it must be remembered from generation to generation.”

AbeFoxmanImage

From the Jewish vantage point, it’s obvious why they wish to elevate the Holocaust narrative to sacrosanct, cult-like status, and to keep it there for all eternity. It supremely serves the Jewish-Zionist interest to have the Gentile masses genuflecting at the altar of Jewish victimology. As Norman Finkelstein argues in his book The Holocaust Industry, the Holocaust story serves to bolster Jewish economic and political privilege and works simultaneously to subdue forces opposed to that privilege. In other words, it is a weaponized mechanism of Jewish power and advancement, wielded like a sledgehammer against opponents of Zionism and Jewish ethnic supremacism in our world; it works to shame and stigmatize all criticism of Jews, Israel and their malevolent actions. A former Israeli minister once said that invoking the Holocaust as well as the “anti-Semite” canard are deceptive “tricks” designed to stifle debate about Jewish-Zionist atrocities in Palestine and their disproportionate power in the West. Who in their right mind can disagree?

1016856_336755729792690_6897076_n copy

Was that not the desired outcome of the Holocaust campaign all along, to weaken Gentile resolve in the face of Zionist domination as well as guilt-trip the world into fast-tracking the creation of a Jewish state in Palestine? It appears so, and is evidenced by many statements from Jewish leaders over the years, going back as far as the year 1900. That year seems to have been a coming out party for the Zionist clique hell-bent on conquering the world led by such tribalist fanatics as Rabbi Stephen S. Wise and Chaim Wiezmann, two ultra-dedicated Jewish supremacist activists who plotted for decades to bring about the creation of Israel. In 1919 Weizmann said that securing the Zionist dream would be achieved “through persistent propaganda, through unceasing demonstration of the life force of our people.” He then issued an ultimatum to the world:

“We will establish ourselves in Palestine whether you like it or not. You can hasten our arrival or you can equally retard it. It is however better for you to help us so as to avoid our constructive powers being turned into a destructive power which will overthrow the world.”

WeizmannImage

Two decades earlier at a Zionist meeting in New York, Rabbi Wise spoke of “6,000,000 living, bleeding, suffering arguments in favor of Zionism,” a prescient remark that laid the foundation of what many have called the “Six Million Myth.” The propagation of that myth did not begin at the close of the Second World War, but evidently in 1900 and even before that, by Zionists attempting to garner sympathy for their cause of establishing a Jewish state in a land mostly populated by Arabs.

Dating from 1900 to 1945, there are hundreds of examples of individual Jews, Jewish-owned newspapers and pro-Zionist Christians invoking the story of “six million Jews” in grave danger of persecution or annihilation. I mentioned 13 glaring examples of this in my book Grand Deceptions, some of which are: the 1906 New York Times article reporting on the claims of Jewish activist Dr. Paul Nathan who alleged that six million Russian Jews were facing “murderous extermination” by the Czar; the 1911 presage by Max Nordau, a prominent Zionist leader, who told his co-religionists at the Zionist Congress in Switzerland that six million Jews would soon fall victim to a campaign of genocide by European regimes; the countless references to six million victimized Jews during World War I, particularly the 1919 American Hebrew article which told of “six million Jewish men and women” languishing in a “holocaust” of hunger and despair; the 1936 pronouncement of Chaim Weizmann before a British commission on Palestine, where he said that “six million Jews” were destined to death in Europe, and that their only refuge was “in the land of Israel”; another 1936 Zionist plea published in the New York Times which envisaged a harrowing “Holocaust” of Europe’s Jews, the only remedy for which was said to be “the restoration of the land of Israel to the children of Israel”; a 1940 warning from World Jewish Congress chairman Nahum Goldmann who alleged that a Nazi victory in Europe would spell “doom and destruction” for “6,000,000 Jews”; the December 1944 proclamation of Soviet propagandist Ilya Ehrenburg who floated the claim that “six million Jews” had fallen victim to Germany five months before the war would come to an end in May of 1945, long before any accurate statistical data on war deaths could have been ascertained. Even after the war, a precise calculation of Jewish deaths would be impossible considering the contentious issue of what constitutes a Jew to begin with. Yet by way of some miracle the Jewish leadership knew it was exactly “six million” before the last bombs and bullets of the war had reached their targets.

six-millions-1919-1 copy

The six million death figure is not rooted in any semblance of truth or fact, but rather in religious superstition stemming from the Kabbalah and gematria. The number six and variations of it is significant in that milieu. Mysticism and ‘magic’ is part and parcel of the Jewish religion, and manifests itself in the propaganda of the Holocaust narrative. The six million story was crafted by Jews transfixed with the Kabbalistic school of thought, which is why facts, evidence, logic and reason have no bearing on it – no matter what it remains a stagnant, unalterable story etched in stone, and anyone who attempts to revise it, even slightly, is villainized as a ‘Nazi-sympathizer.’

Regardless of the massive official reductions in the death totals at Auschwitz, Majdanek, Mauthausen and other wartime camps (more than four million “victims” have been excised from the official death total in recent decades), the six million figure is never altered, and is repeated again and again in schools and the media. Despite admissions from and exposé’s on prominent “Holocaust survivors” proving that their recollection of events was embellished, exaggerated and in some cases outright fabricated, skeptics are smeared as ‘hatemongers.’ Notwithstanding the scientific studies of chemists like Germar Rudolf, which have severally undermined claims about homicidal gas chambers, questioning the central tenets of the story (the six million number, the gas chambers, the “final solution” plan, etc.) is considered an unforgivable heresy and is stamped out with medieval fundamentalism. Does this not confirm that the doubters are on to something?

Jewish leaders seem to have an uncanny knack for foresight, unveiling a historical pattern of foreknowledge indicative of a conscious plan of intrigue coordinated over decades if not centuries. The aforementioned Rabbi Stephen Wise, who is described by the website of the US Holocaust Memorial Museum as “instrumental in obtaining President Woodrow Wilson’s support for the Balfour Declaration of 1917,” predicted the election of Woodrow Wilson as US President and later became his advisor; the Zionist leader Max Nordau predicted World War I in 1903; as mentioned above, Zionists routinely anticipated the demise of six million Jews, and then declared six million Jewish deaths months before World War II had even ended; in 1962, David Ben-Gurion, Israel’s first prime minister, prophesied the establishment of a Jewish-led world government centered in Jerusalem where the United Nations “will build a Shrine of the Prophets to serve the federated union of all continents”; in 1979 the founder of Israel’s spy agencies, Isser Harel, envisioned a terrorist attack upon New York City’s “tallest building.” Is all of this uncanny prescience merely coincidental, or are these Zionist Jews political magicians who “make” happen what they want to see in the world?

Screen Shot 2013-05-18 at 10.53.23 AM copy

The agenda behind the Holocaust promotion industry couldn’t be more transparent. Memorializing the Holocaust is “central to the new world order,” Ian J. Kagedan, a spokesman of the Jewish-Masonic B’nai B’rith organization, wrote in 1991, adding that “achieving our quest of a ‘new world order’ depends on our learning the Holocaust’s lessons.” Using coded-language, Kagedan spoke of Holocaust mythology as a sort of “new religion” to be instituted worldwide that will function as a platform to launch a project for global Jewish hegemony, although the Zionists will disguise the scheme as a humanitarian endeavor aimed at ridding the world of war and calamity. In 1940, the British politician Arthur Greenwood announced that Jews would be granted a leading role in the construction of a “New World Order” after the defeat of Nazi Germany in World War II, a world in which alleged Jewish grievances would be alleviated by way of unrestricted access to power positions. We have seen many parts of that vision enacted according to plan.

If nothing else, the unsettling BBC program mentioned above should serve to motivate people to challenge the supremacist discourse of Holocaustianity. While doing so may jeopardize career prospects and social status, fighting this artificial, largely fabricated narrative is one of the principal liberation struggles of our time; one that will work to empower the dispossessed and perennially victimized Palestinians who continue to be slaughtered by Israel in droves (with the full support of Zionized Western powers), and also the peoples of the West who, for the last few centuries, have been used as tools for Zionist imperialism and whose own cultures have been degraded by these same forces.

Copyright 2015 Brandon Martinez

Video | URL: http://wp.me/p4UshE-Mx
http://nonalignedmedia.com/2015/08/holocaustianity-on-the-march/

Drawing inspiration from the Non-Aligned Movement, especially the organization’s rejection of illegitimate global power structures, Non-Aligned Media (NAM) exists to expose, in particular, the negative outgrowths of the global Zionist-American Empire. Founded by journalists Brandon Martinez and Joshua Blakeney, the aim of NAM is to cut through the spin and deception of mainstream media and uncover truth in history. Not shackled by the political correctness which permeates the mainstream, NAM seeks to tackle the “taboo” subjects that have been relegated to the fringes by the powers that be, emphasizing the real forces behind war and globalism. Reoccurring themes of NAM include: False-Flag Terrorism, The Israel Lobby, The Mainstream Media, Hollywood and Zionism, Historical Revisionism, Supposed “Just Wars” Historically and Contemporarily, Ethnic Exceptionalism: Who Can be Ethnocentric and Who Cannot?, Race & Cultural Relativism, The Globalization of the Israel-Palestine Conflict, Thought-Crime Legislation and the State Regulation of History, Theology and Supremacism, The Geopolitical Battles Over the Middle East, Joshua Blakeney, Nationalism versus Internationalism.

Brandon Martinez can be contacted by email at: martinezperspective@hotmail.com

Joshua Blakeney can be contacted by email at: josh.vivelarevolucion@gmail.com

Let’s offend everyone all at once Public Service Announcement from RadicalPress.com

11822465_1011369455550260_3201501130005138086_n

Paralysis of the will to live by John Kaminski

Kaminski Hdr copy 2

PARALYSIS OF THE WILL TO LIVE

EVERYBODY KNOWS who is going to kill us
BUT NOBODY WILL ACT to stop them

By John Kaminski
pseudoskylax@gmail.com

We see the signs all around us. They are impossible to ignore. Taken to their logical conclusion, these ominous trends show that many of us are soon to be killed, erased by a monstrous mindset that is corrupt to its core and specializes in killing large numbers of people for reasons that are always phony.

Yet how does it come to be that we don’t even have the gumption to save ourselves?

Noble doctors are being murdered. Their deaths are being called suicides, or accidents. And the police refuse to investigate, because the police only work for those who control the money and pay their salaries. The Department of Homeland Security works to protect the Jews, and no one else, which is why 97 percent of the DHS grants go to Jewish groups.  http://mondoweiss.net/2012/07/islamophobia-shmislamophobia-97-of-homeland-security-security-grants-go-to-jewish-orgs

Doctors who are being killed for disobeying Big Pharma’s orders to push the pills no matter how many people they kill comes at a time when legislation for mandatory vaccinations is sweeping the country, or at least sweeping California. http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-33333788

These laws making poison vaccines mandatory guarantee that most of the next generation will be deformed if not dead, or at least chronically ill for the remainder of their agonizing lives. And doctors who don’t toe that line will be deformed or dead also, as current events clearly demonstrate. http://thefreethoughtproject.com/5-holistic-heath-doctors-dead-5-missing-month-run-ins-feds/

Simultaneously, vampire opportunists sell amputated parts of aborted babies’ torn up torsos to unscrupulous pharmaceutical ghouls for use in drugs to make old people young and young people more beautiful, and traitors in the halls of government insist the practice is perfectly legal and urge that those with moral objections to this cannibalistic practice should be put in jail. http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/07/14/heres-the-company-that-buys-aborted-body-parts-from-planned-parenthood/

Kind of reminds me of the Jewish congressman who proposed charging with treason all those in the Gaza flotilla who tried to supply food to starving Palestinians. To the kosher pigs who are bleeding the world dry, trying to feed people who are starving to death is the equivalent of treason. http://mondoweiss.net/2010/06/rep-sherman-prosecute-u-s-citizens-involved-with-gaza-flotilla

Day is night, war is peace, the truth is a lie and America is no longer the bastion of truth and freedom but of depravity, sadism and involuntary and unconscious servitude.

Making it legal to steal the organs of still living fetuses yet making it a crime to refuse poison inoculations ordered by the government shows how upside down things have become in a world gone mad, twisted beyond human recognition by slimy Jewish criminals.

Then, there is the appropriately named Dark Act (DARK = Deny Americans the Right to Know), which refuses to name the real ingredients of genetically modified food because then the public would know they are being fed products that eventually will make them sick and die, or in the case of glyphosate, give them cancer and trigger an antibiotic resistance that will make that cancer impossible to cure. http://civileats.com/2015/07/20/5-things-to-know-about-the-dark-act/

The Dark Act would overrule all laws by states providing for the labeling of GMO ingredients in food products.

And on the heels of the Patriot Act, the death of the Freedom of Information Act, and the National Defense Authorization Act that allows the president to jail or kill anyone he wishes without even the pretext of charges or a trial, we have the Trans Pacific Partnership, the details of which are secret, approved by Congress, and won’t be revealed to the public for many years to come.

The TPP, as it is called, supersedes U.S. legislative and judicial bodies, thereby ruling out any citizen input in any decision this secret board decides to make. It is an appropriate companion to Obama’s executive order law that allows him to kill people with impunity.

Fortunately, TPP member nations are still bickering about advantages for themselves, but the deal is expected to pass and the actual provisions are likely not to be known by the public for years, if ever. http://www.flushthetpp.org/trans-pacific-partnership-talks-key-issues-preventing-a-deal/

Can’t refuse vaccines (or you will lose your job), can’t sue the company who makes the vaccines that makes you sick and destroys your children. Under the TPP, corporate power would eclipse legislative measures, more jobs would be shipped overseas, and food safety, public health and Internet freedom will all be jeopardized http://www.exposethetpp.org/TPPImpactsYou.html.

PaineQuote

It is no understatement to say the United States of America in no longer a free country.

And that’s without even mentioning the troops and military vehicles that have been deployed around the country and the military exercises being carried out, plus the new attitude of police to kill innocent people without a second thought thanks to the training they’ve received in Israel, and also the proclivity of the corrupt court system to jail people who are innocent but in conflict with the corrupt criminal government, and to ignore the ghastly crimes that our government commits around the world using the excuse of the War on Terror when the real terrorists are in Washington planning the demise of its own population.

Which brings us back to all these dead doctors, Bradstreet who supposedly committed suicide by shooting himself in the chest, and Nick Gonzalez, in perfect shape then suddenly dead of a heart attack, just like the social critic Andrew Breitbart, who dropped dead in the street age 43 the night before he was supposed to reveal something sinister about Obama, with witnesses pursued by the government insisting his skin was cherry red when he first hit the pavement.

You can bet there’s a war on terror. And the U.S. government is inflicting the terror, not fighting it, not only through these faux terror units Al-Qaeda and ISIS that murder innocent people around the world, but now inside the U.S., with its brainwashed troops waging it against the American people.

Instead of looking to help people, our government is intent on finding ways to put people in jail. Those who oppose such government tyrannies as the lies of Big Pharma are to be killed, because the corrupt legal system will protect the killers and ignore the injustice to the victims.

It is beyond me how anyone in the world cannot be aware of this situation.

Is it our supposedly renowned history that makes us afraid to act? Many of us, especially old geezers like myself, were brought up in solid families, taught to respect the social order, church, school, voting, public service. We lived in a system that appeared to work. It is only now, sixty years later, that we learn it has always been a charade.

That larger forces always controlled the minds of the lemmings who read the newspapers, who watched the talking heads on TV saying those who warned us of the Communist threat were grossly exaggerating the situation. Now, a half century later, we routinely read of the Soviet agents who surrounded Roosevelt, and watch the homosexuals in the White House systematically dismantle the systems the provided Americans with a safe place to live.

These systems are no longer in place. America is no longer a safe place to live, which is why so many people are fleeing the sinking ship. In a really tangible way, these people are rats leaving the beleaguered ship that gave them such a good life for so long, and now that the safe sanctuary has been stolen by foreign financiers, rather than fight to save the nation that has been so good to them, they’re abandoning what once was called the greatest country in the history of the world.

Who can blame them? The forces arrayed against them are formidable, perhaps insurmountable. Why fight something that history has shown cannot be defeated?

But then, that’s the problem that eventually proved to be the fatal flaw in the American experiment — lack of social responsibility. America didn’t get to be a great place to live by accident. It took real work, and a constant vigilance against the corruption that ruins every honest effort.

The people who really destroyed America were the law abiding citizens who never questioned what their government was doing. Ever since Patrick Henry first protested that the Constitution was a pig in a poke, there has been plenty to question, but the questions were mostly left unasked. http://www.123helpme.com/view.asp?id=23246

For a long time now, Americans have not only abandoned that vigilance, but they have ignored the rigorous effort it takes to keep society running with straightforward honesty. How many stories have you heard about corruption, in every area of society, from New York City building inspectors to corrupt Boston politicians (just to name two examples)? Corruption has become a joke, and it is the cause of the death of the American republic.

The failure of public responsibility, the failure to be honest with one’s peers and neighbors, and the failure of being honest with one’s own family members leading to the destruction of the American family, which connects directly with the failure of American society.

All this disappointment — especially the destruction of the family — has led to a paralysis of the will to live, an overwhelming negativity about having any impact on the world, and an utter frustration about dealing with the liars who have exploited and destroyed all those processes that make a society viable.

Now there is only cynicism and decay, sarcasm and disgust, about a system that must work if we are to survive.

But everybody is too jaded, too self centered, to realize that if their family is fragmented and dysfunctional, and their country is a jumble of corruption, then the hope for personal satisfaction is gone as well, as the entire population is atomized, alienated, and isolated, just the way the Jews want it to take control of everybody’s mind for the purpose of controlling their buying habits and their political choices.

We can blame the Jews or castigate the system for not being responsible for the people it is supposed to serve, but I think the real blame lies within each of us for failing to recognize that our own social responsibility is the key element to making sure our lives are safe and satisfying.

We have utterly failed in this effort, which is why we now are at the mercy of killer politicians who regard us all more as profit possibilities than actual people.

It’s time to demand that everyone holding public office now give up their offices in favor of people who have the welfare of the American people — rather than the corporations who make them rich — their top priority. To not do this is to admit we really don’t care about our lives.

We can spend a lot of time itemizing the techniques that have led us to become alienated and ineffective, but if we don’t slough them off and get busy removing the criminals who have spoiled this country for everyone, we won’t have the chance to remove them for very much longer.

And if we don’t remove them permanently, they will remove us permanently. I can’t believe everybody doesn’t already know that this is what they’re already doing to us.

Freedom doesn’t come naturally. You have to fight to get it, as our forefathers did, and fight even harder to keep it. Once you give up that fight, which the majority in America today has done, you give up your will to live. What will result from that is very predictable, and today, we see it happening all around us.

—-

John Kaminski is a writer who lives on the Gulf Coast of Florida, constantly trying to figure out why we are destroying ourselves, and pinpointing a corrupt belief system as the engine of our demise. Solely dependent on contributions from readers, please support his work by mail: 6871 Willow Creek Circle #103, North Port FL 34287 USA.
http://therebel.is/kaminski
http://johnkaminski.info/
http://www.rudemacedon.ca/kaminski/kam-index.html
http://web.archive.org/web/20040323232319/http://johnkaminski.com/

Paul Singer and the Universality of “Anti-Semitism” by Andrew Joyce

Screen Shot 2015-08-04 at 11.09.17 AM

Paul Singer and the Universality of “Anti-Semitism”
August 1, 2015
Andrew Joyce

Screen Shot 2015-08-04 at 10.38.41 AM
Paul Singer, founder and president of Elliott Management Corp., speaks during the SkyBridge Alternatives (SALT) conference in Las Vegas, Nevada, U.S., on Wednesday, May 9, 2012. Singer said he’s betting the price of 30-year sovereign debt in the U.S., Europe and Japan will fall. Photographer: Jacob Kepler/Bloomberg via Getty Images

One of the most fundamental positions for White advocates concerned with Jewish influence must be the conviction that antagonism against Jews lies in Jewish behavior rather than solely the cultural pathology or psychological tendencies of non-Jews. A major testing ground for this position is the necessity for anti-Jewish attitudes to be present among geographically, racially, and culturally diverse peoples, and for the reasons behind this antagonism to be fairly uniform. In Separation and Its Discontents Kevin MacDonald argued that a social identity theory of anti-Semitism is highly compatible with supposing that anti-Semitism will be a very common characteristic of human societies in general. Reasons for this pervasiveness lie in Jewish cultural separatism leading to the perception of the Jewish group as an alien entity; inter-group resource and reproductive competition; and finally, the fact that Jews are, for cultural and genetic reasons, highly adept in resource competition against non-Jews. Additionally, Jews are adept at influencing culture and creating and influencing intellectual and political movements which often run contrary to the interests of the host population. Wherever these behaviors and circumstances are present, they contribute to the arousal of hostility in a host population.

Despite overwhelming evidence in support of our position, the vast majority of Jewish historiography and apologetics continue to argue something quite different. Our opponents have successfully disseminated the view that anti-Semitism is a peculiarly Western phenomenon, rooted more or less in a cocktail of evil Christian theology, the implicit frustrations of capitalist society, the despotic nature of the Western family, and even repressed sexual desires. A key aspect of maintaining this narrative has been to downplay non-Western (mainly Muslim) anti-Semitism, or attempt to give it different features. However, as MacDonald has noted, “the remarkable thing about anti-Semitism is that there is an overwhelming similarity in the complaints made about Jews in different places and over very long periods of historical time.”[1] Of the universal themes noted by MacDonald, the theme of resource competition and economic domination is perhaps foremost.

I was moved to reflect on the universality of this theme recently when surveying media coverage on Korean and Argentinian responses to the activities of Paul Singer and his co-ethnic shareholders at Elliot Associates, an arm of Singer’s Elliot Management hedge fund. The Korean story has its origins in the efforts of Samsung’s holding company, Cheil Industries, to buy SamSung C&T, the engineering and construction arm of the wider Samsung family of businesses. The move can be seen as part of an effort to reinforce control of the conglomerate by the founding Lee family and its heir apparent, Lee Jae-Jong. Trouble emerged when Singer’s company, which  holds a 7.12% stake in SamSung C&T and is itself attempting to expand its influence and control of Far East tech companies, objected to the move. The story is fairly typical of Jewish difficulties in penetrating business cultures in the Far East where impenetrable family monopolies, known in Korea as chaebols, are common. This new story reminded me very strongly of last year’s efforts by Jewish financier Daniel Loeb to obtain a board seat at Sony. Loeb was repeatedly rebuffed by COO Kuzuo Hirai, eventually selling his stake in Sony Corp. in frustration.

The predominantly Jewish-owned and operated Elliot Associates has a wealth of self-interest in preventing the Lee family from consolidating its control over the Samsung conglomerate. As racial outsiders, however, Singer’s firm were forced into several tactical measures in their 52-day attempt to thwart the merger. First came lawsuits.  When those failed, Singer and his associates then postured themselves as defending Korean interests, starting a Korean language website and arguing that their position was really just in aid of helping domestic Korean shareholders. This variation on the familiar theme of Jewish crypsis was quite unsuccessful. The Lee family went on the offensive immediately and, unlike many Westerners, were not shy in drawing attention to the Jewish nature of Singer’s interference and the sordid and intensely parasitic nature of his fund’s other ventures.

Screen Shot 2015-08-04 at 10.38.59 AM
“Because of Elliot Associates, Congo suffered even more hardship.”

The Lee offensive started with a series of cartoons posted on the Samsung website. Most singled out the manner in which Elliot Associates has enjoyed its remarkable growth by focusing on the purchase of national debts from struggling countries at a fraction of their worth, before using ruthless legal measures to sue those countries for values far exceeding the original debt. On its most basic level, the practice is really just the same as Jewish involvement in medieval tax farming. On the older practice, Salo Baron writes in Economic History of the Jews that Jewish speculators would pay a lump sum to the treasury before mercilessly turning on the peasantry to obtain “considerable surpluses … if need be, by ruthless methods.”[2] The activities of Elliot Associates are really the same speculation in debt, except here the trade in usury is practiced on a global scale with the feudal peasants of old now replaced with whole nations. The above cartoon refers to the specific activities of Elliot Associates in Congo where it originally bought $32.6 million in sovereign debt incurred by that country for the knockdown price of under $20 million. In 2002 and 2003, a British court (tactically chosen) forced the Congolese government to settle for an estimated $90 million, which included that all-important interest and fees. Elliot Associates rapidly became known as the quintessential “Vulture Fund.”

As I noted in my previous examination of contemporary Jewish usury, Jews have been at the forefront of innovation in debt for many centuries, and remain its most adroit auteurs. Although obviously rooted in centuries of Jewish financial practice, Singer and his co-ethnics (all four equity partners of Elliot are Jewish and its COO is the charmingly-named Zion Shohet), pioneered the finer points of the Vulture Fund concept. The firm was born in 1977 when Singer pooled $1.3 million from family and friends, but it only really took off in October 1995, when Elliott Associates L.P. purchased $28.7 million of Panamanian sovereign debt for the discounted price of $17.5 million. The banks holding those bonds, a group that included heavy hitters like Citi and Credit Suisse, had given up on repayment from Panama. To cut their losses they sold their holdings to Elliott which, like a medieval tax farmer, went in with a heavy hand. When Panama’s government asked for a restructuring of its foreign debt in 1995, the vast majority of its bondholders agreed — apart from Elliott. In July 1996, Elliott Associates, represented by one of the world’s most high-profile securities law firms, filed a lawsuit against Panama in a New York district court seeking full repayment of the original $28.7 million — plus interest and fees. The case made its way from a district court in Manhattan to the New York State Supreme Court, which sided with Elliott. In the end, Panama’s government had to pay the Jewish group over $57 million, with an additional $14 million going to other creditors. Overnight Singer’s group made $40 million, and the people of Panama found their original sovereign debt had more than doubled.

Foreign Policy described the court’s decision as “a groundbreaking moment in the modern history of finance.” By taking the case to a New York district court, Elliott broke with long-standing international law and custom, according to which sovereign governments are not sued in regular courts meant to deal with questions internal to a nation state. Further, the presiding judge accepted the case — another break with custom. It set the stage for two decades of similar parasitism on struggling countries by Elliot Associates, a practice that has reaped billions for Jewish financiers. Just one year after the Panama decision, Singer spent about $11 million on government-backed Peruvian bank debt in 1996. After taking Peru to court in the U.S., U.K., Luxembourg, Belgium, Germany, and Canada, the struggling nation finally agreed in 2000 to pay him $58 million. That meant he got better than a 400 percent return. In 2001 Elliot Associates purchased an Argentinian default for $48 million — the face value of that debt today is $630 million. The fund wants repayment for the full value of the debt to all of Argentina’s creditors, as it did in 1995 with Panama. This amounts to $1.5 billion, which could rise to $3 billion including, again, that all-important interests and fees.

The merciless nature of these Jewish vulture funds has provoked some comment, but the general populations of many countries aren’t familiar with enough of the facts to start joining the dots. Nevertheless, this type of financial parasitism has had a devastating impact on a number of nations. A sovereign’s money is technically owned by its citizens. Making the Panamanian, Argentinian, Congolese, Ecuadorian, Polish or Vietnamese government pay for the full value of the debt, plus interest and fees, even as the major creditors accepted a discounted payment, meant handing citizens’ money to a hedge fund rather than investing in, for example, roads, schools, hospitals, clean water projects or social welfare programs. In the aftermath of Elliot’s judgment against Congo, the Congolese were forced to abandon water purification programs leading to widespread dehydration. It was to this context that the Samsung cartoon referred.

Screen Shot 2015-08-04 at 10.39.20 AM
“Elliott Management’s representative method of earning money is to buy the national debt of a struggling country cheaply, then insist on taking control as an investor and start a legal suit.”

Other cartoons appearing at the same time represented Elliot, literally, as humanoid vultures with captions referring to the well-known history of the fund. In the above cartoon, the vulture offers assistance to a needy and destitute figure, but conceals an axe with which to later bludgeon the unsuspecting pauper.

After the cartoons appeared Singer and other influential Jews, including Abraham Foxman, cried anti-Semitism. This was despite the fact the cartoons contain no reference whatsoever to Judaism — unless of course one defines savage economic predation as a Jewish trait. Samsung denied the cartoons were anti-Semitic and took them off the website, but the uproar over the cartoons only seemed to spur on even more discussion about Jewish influence in South Korea than was previously the case. In a piece published a fortnight ago, Media Pen columnist Kim Ji-ho claimed “Jewish money has long been known to be ruthless and merciless.” Last week the former South Korean ambassador to Morocco, Park Jae-seon, expressed his concern about the influence of Jews in finance when he said, “The scary thing about Jews is they are grabbing the currency markets and financial investment companies. Their network is tight-knit beyond one’s imagination.” The next day, cable news channel YTN aired similar comments by local journalist Park Seong-ho, who stated on air that “it is a fact that Jews use financial networks and have influence wherever they are born.” It goes without saying that comments like these are unambiguously similar to complaints about Jewish economic practices in Europe over the course of centuries. The only common denominator between the context of fourteenth-century France and the context of twenty first-century South Korea is, you guessed it, Jewish economic practices.

In the end, the Lee strategy, based on drawing attention to the alien and exploitative nature of Elliot Associates, was overwhelmingly effective. Before a crucial shareholder vote on the Lee’s planned merger, Samsung Securities CEO Yoon Yong-am, said: “We should score a victory by a big margin in the first battle in order take the upper hand in a looming war against Elliott, and keep other speculative hedge funds from taking short-term gains in the domestic market.” When the vote finally took place a few days ago, a conclusive 69.5% of Samsung shareholders voted in favor of the Lee proposal, leaving Elliot licking its wounds and complaining about the ‘patriotic marketing’ of those behind the merger.

Jewish difficulties in penetrating close-knit Far Eastern monopolies, many of which are open in their belief that Jews are capable and ruthless opponents in business, thus persist. East Asians are seemingly aware that giving Jewish businessmen an inch will normally lead to non-Jews losing a mile. It is this honest grappling with the facts that kept Daniel Loeb off the board at Sony, and prevented Elliot Associates from making even slight gains at Samsung.

The Far East also appears less prone to Jewish moralizing about the “dangers” of anti-Semitism, and one finds that criticism of Jewish behaviors enjoys a considerably higher level of intellectual and cultural respectability. A good example is when Foumiko Kometani won the 1986 Akutagawa award, Japan’s top literary prize, for her novel Passover. Based on her real-life experiences with her Jewish husband and severely retarded bi-racial son, Kometani’s novel was subjected to excoriating criticism from Jewish critics who denounced her unflattering (but presumably quite accurate) depictions of Jewish figures in the book as “anti-Semitic.” Japanese critics, on the other hand, were notably unaffected by negative Jewish press treatment of the book, and found the treatment of Jewish clannishness and “distasteful” religious practices to be enriching qualities which gave the work a greater sense of authenticity and honesty.

Switching our focus to South America, high-profile figures in Argentina have also been accused of pushing “anti-Semitic conspiracy theories” for their responses to Elliot’s parasitism. After Singer’s firm won an extortionate judgment against Argentina at the US Supreme Court last year, Argentina President, Cristina Fernández de Kirchner, described Singer on her personal website as the “Vulture Lord.” But Jewish power-brokers were left even more aghast at Kirchner’s open denunciation of a “global modus operandi” that “generates international political operations of any type, shape and color.” They “contribute to financial attacks or simultaneous international media operations, or even worse, covert actions of various ‘services’ designed to destabilize governments.”

What Kirchner was referring to was the underlying issue at the heart of Singer’s particularly venomous pursuit of Argentine debt. You see, Argentina has cultivated relations with Iran for a number of decades now, and rumor has it that Kirchner and her foreign minister conspired with Iran to cover up its involvement in the 1994 bombing of a Jewish community center in Buenos Aires. Two years ago Jewish prosecutor Alberto Nisman lobbied the Delegation of Argentine Israeli Associations (Daia) — which represents the country’s Jews — to mount a legal challenge against a memorandum of understanding between Argentina and Iran. Nisman is reported to have told the Delegation that “if necessary, Paul Singer will help us.” Nisman then turned his attention to pursuing Kirchner for the alleged cover-up over the bombing. Argentina thus came under Jewish financial, political, diplomatic and legal attack. In January this year, however, Nisman was found dead with a single bullet wound to the head just hours before he was due to take his final report to Congress. Israelis and diaspora Jews have been crying foul ever since. In retaliation, Kirchner has pointed out that Singer is indeed one of the major funders of The Israel Project (TIP), the most vocal lobby in Washington against diplomacy with Iran. Kirchner argues that Singer’s effort to financially ravage Argentina is merely an extension of denunciations of Argentine-Iranian relations by AIPAC and Mark Dubowitz’s Foundation for Defense of Democracies. Also, by his own admission, Dubowitz was a personal friend of Nisman. Or in Kirchner’s words, “Everything has to do with everything.”

Of course, openly stating that Jews are powerful and work together for financial and political goals breaks one of the most cherished of contemporary taboos. Despite the astonishing level and deeply entwined nature of Jewish wealth and political power on display, I’m guessing the kosher script would have us all believe that what we are observing is just a bunch of coincidences and that Jews are in fact as poor and powerless as the next guy. “It’s a lie,” said Daia’s vice-president Waldo Wolff. “It’s terrible, it’s incredible.” A spokesman for Elliott Management denied the accusations, saying the suggestion “that Mr Singer had any contact whatsoever with Mr Nisman is categorically false. This is just another desperate attempt by Cristina Kirchner to blame creditors for her administration’s multiplying scandals and failed economic policies.” Of course, with reference to the facts outlined above, both Jewish groups are simply lying. Their lies didn’t assist the investigation of the 1994 bombing, with a new prosecutor dismissing all claims against Kirchner in April. Also, Nisman’s murder remains unsolved.

As Singer continues to tighten the screws on Argentina, the nation and its President continue to provoke accusations of “anti-Semitism.” During a July 2 visit to a Buenos Aries school, Kirchner told students that to better understand Argentina’s economic crisis, they should read Shakespeare’s The Merchant of Venice. On Twitter Kirchner recounted how she had asked students she met which Shakespeare play they were studying. When they told the president they were studying Romeo and Juliet, Kirchner said she responded, “I said, ‘Have you read The Merchant of Venice to understand the vulture funds?’ They all laughed. “No, don’t laugh,” I said, “Usury and the bloodsuckers were immortalized by the best literature for centuries.” The Delegation of Argentine Jewish Associations, quickly issued a statement condemning Kirchner’s comments and accused her of having “anti-Semitic” motivations behind her invocation of the play. Abraham Foxman then waddled onto the stage, urging Kirchner to “stop reinforcing anti-Semitic stereotypes.” “We are deeply concerned that President Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner is once again promoting anti-Semitic stereotypes,” whined Foxman. “The Merchant of Venice — with its nefarious character Shylock — reinforces stereotypes of Jews and presents them as money-hungry, conniving and cruel, and by suggesting students to study this play, she is sending a message to Argentina’s youth that Jews are somehow connected to the economic woes of her country.”

God forbid Argentine youth should ever come to such a view! How unfair that would be when the firm behind its pauperization is so thoroughly staffed by such Anglo-Saxons as Paul Singer, Zion Shohet, Jesse Cohn, Stephen Taub, Elliot Greenberg and Richard Zabel.

A final note about the Vulture Fund Jews. As hinted above in relation to their pro-Israel, anti-Iran activities, they are not just financially predatory. As Kirchner has stated, “Everything is connected to everything.” At TOO we are aware of the fact that strongly identifying as Jewish normally involves a great deal of hostility toward the traditions of the European peoples. This has very often led to attempts by powerful Jewish financiers and intellectuals to open our borders to mass immigration and overturn traditional values. I was recently sent a piece from CNBC which highlighted the fact that the U.S. Supreme Court decision in favor of same-sex marriage was welcomed by “a perhaps surprising group: conservative hedge fund managers.”

The news might have surprised CNBC, but won’t surprise TOO readers, or indeed anyone remotely familiar with the nature of the Jewish conflict with the West. There is nothing at all genuinely “conservative” about these people. The hedge fund managers included Dan Loeb, who failed to get the board seat at Sony, Paul Singer, Steve Cohen of Point72 Asset Management and Cliff Asness of AQR Capital Management. All have been vocal in disapproving of President Barack Obama, mainly for his diplomacy with Iran, but all have worked for years in support of gay marriage. “It’s a gratifying day for equality under the law,” Asness said after the Supreme Court ruling. “We’re pleased with the Court’s ruling because we believe in social justice for all Americans and hope this serves as a catalyst for global change,” added Cohen. Singer created American Unity PAC in 2012 to support the cause, and plowed $11 million into making gay marriage a reality. Other donors to American Unity PAC included Loeb, Asness, Seth Klarman of Baupost Group, and David Tepper of Appaloosa Management.  According to CNBC, Loeb, Cohen, Singer and other Jewish debt speculators helped to successfully push the legalization of same-sex marriage in New York in 2011. And backers of non-profit Freedom to Marry included Loeb, Klarman, Singer and Asness. So in case you’re wondering where a lot of that plundered international cash went, I can tell you that it ended up in places like the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs, and in myriad efforts to deconstruct the traditional fabric of your society (while still being called “conservative” by MSNBC).

“Anti-Semitism” isn’t a peculiarly Western phenomenon. Nor is it a Korean phenomenon, or an Argentine phenomenon. It is a Jewish phenomenon, and it has followed the Jewish people through the centuries and across the oceans. As long as Jews remain unchanged, so too will the response to them remain unchanged. Efforts to ameliorate “anti-Semitism” through vacuous appeals that it has its origins in sexual repression, Christianity, or family structure may succeed in a West which has grown fat, lazy, navel-gazing and maudlin, and is inundated by pro-Jewish propaganda in the media and educational system. But elsewhere on this Earth such Talmudic theorizing doesn’t go far. The inscrutable Asian will smile and nod at the Hebrew mogul, while patiently and knowingly keeping him from taking a seat or position in his financial affairs. Those in the Second or Third World, at the sharp end of Jewish usury, will remain unconvinced by the pious weeping of the perennial “victim” of world oppression who, paradoxically, possesses the whip hand over them. When the flagship of the Argentinian Navy was seized and detained in Ghana back in 2012 on the say-so of Paul Singer, there was no doubting the level of power that had now been attained by Jewish finance.

Screen Shot 2015-08-04 at 10.39.49 AM

Western youth today are engaged in squeezing itself into skinny jeans and protesting on behalf of African and Mexican invaders. While this pampered generation sips on artisanal coffee, and parades its empathy with alien criminals and a multitude of “trans” aberrations of nature, it remains ignorantly unaware that a cabal of vultures circles above them, just waiting for a fateful slip of their national economies. The U.S. government, it has been said, has made a point of siding with Argentina in its conflict with Elliot Management — the reason being that there are fears in Washington that it too may one day end up under the vulture’s talons.

The man on the street will deny the existence of such a threat, but we know it to be an empirically observable and documented fact. We can only hope for, and work towards, a time when our people will awaken, and allow us to secure a future for our children before it is too late.

____________

[1] K. MacDonald, Separation and Its Discontents: Toward and Evolutionary Theory of Anti-Semitism, (First Paperpack Edition,2004), 38.

[2] S. Baron (ed) Economic History of the Jews (New York, 1976), 46-7.

SOURCE

The Zionist Metis in the Tipi by Arthur Topham

MetisZionistJewinTipiHdr

THE ZIONIST METIS IN THE TIPI

By

Arthur Topham

August 2nd, 2015

“Topham is a racist twat, hate speech is not free speech.”

~ Ryan Mervin Bellerose

“You on the other hand call Mr. Topham derogatory names.
I think you guys hate him, the very charge you accuse him of, and you are
seeking to silence and destroy him because indeed you do hate. I hope you fail.”

~ Bill Whatcott, Christian Activist

Recently a friend on Facebook alerted me to a news item that had been published on the Infotel.ca website regarding my appearance at the Supreme Court in Vancouver on June 22nd, 2015. I was there along with my my counsel Barclay Johnson and his assistant Jeremy Maddock to argue, before Justice Butler and Crown Prosecutor Rodney G. Garson, a Charter issue related to the constitutionality of Sec. 319(2).

Justice Butler reserved his decision until July 8th, 2015 at which time he ruled against the Charter argument, citing case law that militated against the “fragmentation” of the criminal proceedings prior to the trial.

The news item, “Judge in hate speech trial won’t hear free speech charter argument before trial“, was relatively brief and covered the basics, but, as is par for the course when it comes to the mainstream media, the writer, Glynn Brothen, paid his dues to his taskmaster by emphasizing that I had “links to Hitler’s Mein Kampf” on my website.

After reading the article I scrolled down the comments section and it was there that I found something of interest beyond the story.  What I noted was the fact that certain individuals had added comments using their Facebook accounts; individuals whose names I immediately recognized. The first commenter, Ryan Mervin Bellerose, forms the basis of this article; the second commenter, whose name I am not at liberty to divulge due to a court order enacted by Judge Morgan to protect them from “harm or intimidation”, is one of the two complainants in my case.

The initial comment by Bellerose, an individual who apparently lives in Alberta, is, according to information posted on his Facebook page, a Metis who, for those unaware, is a person whose parents were a cross between a French Canadian and Cree First Nations. He is someone whose name I’ve been aware of for some time through secondary sources.

Bellerose’s sexist, juvenile comment is presented in the first of the two quotations cited above. It was later the subject of a rebuttal from Bill Whatcott (also shown above), who, quite clearly, hit the nail on the head when he stated that it’s people like Bellerose who are the real haters.

BelleroseNoGenocide

Now given that these individuals used their Facebook accounts it was a simple procedure to log on to their pages and check out who their “friends” were. Well, lo and behold if it didn’t turn out that Bellerose PLUS the editor of Infotel.ca, Marshall Jones, were both “friends” with the B’nai Brith Canada operative/complainant who initiated this ongoing hate-fest and political persecution back in the year 2007!

So could it actually have been a conspiracy on their part to continue slandering my name and perpetuating the false belief that there is actually something tangible as “hate speech” that warrants arresting people and attempting to put them in jail for years? Perish the thought!

Anyone knowledgeable about the issue of the Zionist Jewish agenda knows that working behind the scenes is their primary modus operandi (that, coupled with control of the media itself) and it’s specifically there, in the murky shadowland of intrigue, that they “breathe together” and best work their Talmudic sorcery in order to discredit and vilify their victims.

BelleroseZionistThings3

Another historic trait of the Zionists is to co-opt, via infiltration, every movement and organization that arises which could somehow either pose a threat to their own inherent hegemony or else embellish it. This is accomplished by enlisting either the help of sayanim, (a term first introduced to the west via Victor Ovstrovsky in his classic revelation of the Israeli Mossad By Way of Deception which means 100% Jewish “assistants”) or else deploying non-Jewish, Gentile or goyim dupes or what is commonly referred to today as “useful idiots” to further their cause. In this manner they are then able to manipulate whatever the agenda is so that it ultimately serves their own heinous plans. This method of influencing and controlling by proxy non-Jewish initiatives is best exemplified by two events in 20th century history; first their surreptitious takeover of the reform movement in Russia in 1917 by the Marxist Bolsheviks and next their hidden control of the Civil Rights movement in the USA back in the 30’s and 40’s that culminated in the political events in the 50s and 60s.

JEWISHEXAMPLE

But there has always been one race or nation or tribal people that the Zionists have had great difficulty in permeating and subverting and that group is Canada’s indigenous First Nations. Given this fact is where we come to the issue of the connection between the bellicose, ignorant and deceptive rhetoric of Ryan Mervin Bellerose and his “friend” from B’nai Brith Canada, a subsidiary of B’nai Brith International (a 19th century Rothschild creation) which is a racist, Jews-only Masonic Order that’s been masquerading throughout Canadian history as little more than a fraternal organization whose primary purpose is to help their fellow, downtrodden Jewish brethren.

Consequently, for the most powerful Zionist Jew lobby organization in the world to have someone within the native community to carry on promoting their illegal and unjust causes – such as the racist, supremacist, murderous and destructive actions by the Israeli state against the helpless Palestinian people; the perpetuation of their ongoing Germanophobia (anti-Hitler, neo-Nazi rhetoric) and Islamophobia; the continuous reinforcement of their monstrous deception of the “Jewish 6 Million holocaust” – and thereby assist them in brainwashing First Nations leaders and members into believing that these two (in reality) diametrically opposed people are somehow, spiritually and politically interconnected is definitely a bonus for the Zionist lobbyists here in Canada. This mode of takeover is, therefore, one of the hallmarks of their clandestine ability to influence and control political events.

That said, the images interspersed throughout this essay are designed to highlight the hypocrisy and bigotry of individuals like Bellerose and his Zionist Jew controllers who function through the likes of his Facebook “friend” and other sayan such as Ezra Levant and the Jewish media. Let us hope that the majority of First Nations people will come to realize that the Zionists are not their friends any more than they are the friends of any other race, tribe or ethnicity. The Zionist agenda is exclusively designed and meant to fulfill its own psychopathic, delusional lust for absolute control over all other nations of the world and this definitely includes those of First Nations heritage.

BelleroseZionistThings2

Bellerose’s words, which I have quoted in the images contained in this essay, are taken from his Facebook page and also from a short essay of his titled, A Native and a Zionist. A google search of his name will reveal the degree of exposure that the Jewish media is giving to this chabez-goy, pseudo-sayan in order to build him up in the eyes of the general public as a voice of First Nations authority; a precise indicator that he’s being exploited for purposes of furthering the Zionist agenda.

BelleroseZionistThings4

One further point bears mentioning in regard to this ever-present strategy of recruiting and harnessing non-Jews to the racist Zionist war machine. I came across this same phenomenon back in February of this year when I was personally attacked by two individuals in the same manner as Bellerose. One of the culprits involved in the initial attack was also part native and coincidentally came from Alberta and he, like Bellerose, also professed to having suffered from “bullying” as a child. Bellerose states this clearly in his article when he writes, “Being the victim of bullying shaped who I am and my sense of right and wrong.  It is one reason that I support Israel.”

In my article of March 21, 2015 titled Zion’s Zombie Army: Neo-Zionist zealots attack RadicalPress.com I focussed on the extent to which the Zionists go in order to gain traction with First Nations and subvert them into believing that the problems and challenges which First Nations people face here in Canada are synonymous with the racist, supremacist, warlike and psychopathic actions of the state of Israel when it comes to the genociding of the Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank and similar actions throughout the Middle East.

PALESTINENOTLIKEUS

There is no longer any doubt in the minds of millions of awakened individuals around the world that the Zionists, via their falsely-won UN beachhead citadel “Israel” created in Arab Palestine in 1948, are the real global bully on the block. Victims of “bullying” like Daniel Gallant and Ryan Mervin Bellerose ultimately become susceptible to further victimization by this self-appointed tribe of perfidious scoundrels and end up selling their souls to the very source of the world’s ongoing angst.

Don'tKillPalestinianKids

Conclusion

I’ve lived in Canada continuously for the past 68 years and consider myself as indigenous to the land as any other person who was born here. As well, throughout my career I’ve lived with and worked with First Nations people as an educator and can safely state from my own experience of First Nations culture that the people who I’ve befriended over the past sixty years bear no resemblance whatsoever to the tribe of Ashkenazi Jews who control the state of Israel as well as the totality of global infrastructure that makes up what we euphemistically call the New World Order; infrastructure that includes the world’s media, Hollywood, the financial institutions, the publishing houses, the corporations, the arms dealers, the petrochemical conglomerate, the pharmaceutical industry,  giant agribusiness and a host of other subsidiaries.

Knowing First Nations people like I do I find it not only inconceivable but incomprehensible that the majority of them would fall for all the bullshit that the Zionist media and its sycophants and sayan attempt to peddle to them as truth. From my perspective for the First Nations of Canada to accept the propaganda of the Zionist Jews is akin to their forebearers having accepted (in good faith) the Hudson Bay blankets laced with small pox. For First Nations to adopt Zionism in any way, shape or fashion would spell the end of their way of life which is already threatened enough due to the pervasive influence of Zionism on our federal and provincial governments.

 BelleroseZioChildKiller

Statements such as the following by Bellerose, “We natives believe in bringing about change peacefully, and we refuse to be affiliated with anyone who engages in violence targeting civilians” are the height of hypocrisy and ignorance. Bellerose obviously is turning a blind eye to the thousands upon thousands, if not millions, of Arab people throughout the Middle East who the Zionists have been bombing and butchering since they formed their “spiritual homeland” in 1948; either directly as in the case of Palestine, or through their proxy nations like the USA, Britain, France, Canada and Australia who have slaughtered millions of Iraqis, Afghanis, Libyans, Syrians, and Jordanians at the behest of the Israeli state.

PalestineCooptingMetisSuffering copy

Generally speaking the First Nations peoples of Canada prefer to negotiate in good faith with the Canadian government but this doesn’t mean that they won’t resist injustice, should it occur, by resorting to other than peaceful means. Has Bellerose forgotten Oka? Is he aware of Gustafson Lake? Does he know of the Chilcotin Wars? These acts of resistance are akin to what the Palestinian people face on a daily basis living under constant threat of violence from the Israeli state and should the government of Canada’s behaviour toward First Nations people continue to be influenced by Israel as we’ve seen throughout the Harper years and become more and more abusive and repressive a time will come when the First Nations people will stand together and resist such oppression by any means necessary, peaceful or otherwise. The Belleroses and Gallants of Canada only serve to create disunity amongst the First Nations people in order to pacify and weaken them and thwart their efforts to remain true to their cultural heritage.

It’s my earnest hope that Canada’s First Nations will not fall for all the sophistry and lies of the Zionists but remain firmly rooted in their own spirituality rather than falling prey to a foreign, atheistic ideology of death and destruction; a spirituality resplendent with the finest qualities necessary to maintain an undying respect for Mother Earth and all her creatures; a spirituality that honours their Elders and their Ancestors and their longstanding tribal customs; a spirituality that treats the children with respect and love; a spirituality that is based upon the belief in a loving and beneficent Creator.

God grant that this will be the First Nations’ path in the perilous times ahead.

—-