Published on Jan 24, 2015
Richard Edmonds and Ursula Haverbeck ask Vladimir Putin to re-investigate the lies of the Soviet Commission in 1945, which formed the basis of the deceitful postwar histories of both the Katyn Massacre and the Auschwitz camp. Ursula Haverbeck points out that with mainstream historical authorities now accepting that Auschwitz was not the scene of the murder of millions of Jews in homicidal gas chambers, there is no established “scene of the crime”. She has challenged official bodies including ministers of the various German states (Länder) to provide an answer – to define the scene of the crime. They have so far failed to do so, and she must therefore conclude that there is no substantiation to the official history of Auschwitz.
Editor’s additional Note: Auchwitz: Media lies or the Truth at last? by Richard Edmonds and Ursula Haverbeck is the follow up video to Ursula’s first ground-breaking Youtube “The Greatest Problem of Our Time” published on RadicalPress.com January 3rd, 2015. Given the fact that years of steady, determined persistence by Ursula Haverbeck to get a response from various officials of the German government regarding the truth about Auschwitz have proven to be fruitless Ursula and her associate Richard Edmonds are now going outside Germany in their search for answers that will unravel the greatest hoax of the 20th century.
Please share this video.
It is John Baird who needs to apologize to the Palestinian people
Dr. Sa’eb Erekat
January 16, 2015
A spokesman for Canadian foreign minister John Baird asked me to apologize to the Israeli government, citing the equivalency I drew between the terror of the self-styled “Islamic State” and that of Israeli settlers who under the banner of a “Jewish State,” and with the backing of their government, have been in a campaign of terror that include the burning of mosques and churches, the destruction of olive groves and the brutal murder of Palestinian civilians.
After spending the past few years listening to Mr. Baird going out of his way to legitimize the banality and brutality of a 50-year-old Israeli occupation, I tell Mr. Baird: enough. If there is anyone that has to apologize, it is Mr. Baird himself. He should first apologize to his own citizenry, many of whom are God-loving Jews, Christians and Muslims who would never condone nor cheer for an Israeli government that stretches support to Israeli settlers who attack churches and mosques.
Mr. Baird should apologize for his active encouragement of Israel’s brute and ugly occupation and its apartheid policies. He should apologize for failing to promote those things Canadians hold dear such as freedom, dignity and human rights and for replacing those ideals with an outspoken support of Israel’s clear and undisputed violations of international law.
Prime Minister Stephen Harper and Foreign Minister Baird were elected at a time when the most right-wing extremist government in the history of Israel was elected. Instead of using their sympathies and working relations with Israel to promote peace, they decided to side with those policies which the entire world – including the United States of America – have rejected. Its outspoken support of Israel’s policies has placed Canada in an awkward position within the United Nations system and has radically altered its standing and image in the Arab and Muslim worlds.
The Palestinian leadership has been engaged in a diplomatic effort to obtain those very same ideals Canadians hold dear – to achieve freedom and dignity. We have been working tirelessly to exercise our right to self-determination and establish a state of our own – a state that lives in peace and security with its neighbours, including Israel. But we repeatedly face a stumbling block in the form of an Israeli government more interested in the consolidation of its illegal settlement build-up, rather than in achieving peace with its neighbours.
Against this background, we have tried to widen our political horizon, not through violence, nor through terror, but by employing the tools available to us under international law. Instead of rewarding the Palestinians for their insistence on pursuing peace and for their deep commitment to the stability and security of the region, Mr. Baird has chosen to deride and stand against Palestinians at every corner.
When the UN in 2012 upgraded Palestine’s status from an observer entity to an observer state, it was not the Israeli Foreign Minister who travelled to New York in order to defend Israel’s position; unfortunately, it was Mr. Baird. Though his efforts were and remain largely ineffective (the resolution passed with an overwhelming majority of 138, with only 9 voting against), they came as a slap in the face to Palestinian efforts. Canada also lobbied against our UNESCO membership, a move aimed at protecting and preserving sites of universal value, such as the Nativity Church and the Roman terraces of the village of Battir. Last November, Canada was one of six countries voting against several UN resolutions requesting an Israeli withdrawal from occupied Palestine, and reaffirming the illegality of Israeli policies including the annexation of Occupied East Jerusalem. The six were Canada, the United States, Micronesia, Palau, the Marshall Islands and Israel.
As a matter of fact, while the whole of the international community condemns Israel for its systematic policy of demolishing Palestinian homes and forcibly displacing Palestinians in Occupied East Jerusalem, Mr. Baird has decided to legitimize Israel’s illegal, de facto annexation of the city by meeting an Israeli minister in Occupied East Jerusalem.
While more than a thousand Palestinian civilians were being slaughtered in Gaza, Canada was among the very few countries that encouraged Israel to continue its attack on the besieged territory. Amnesty International had to remind Mr. Baird that “Canadian policy must reflect unwavering commitment to the fundamental international legal principle of civilian protection and must demonstrate equal concern for both Israeli and Palestinian civilians.” Mr. Baird has utterly failed to shape his policy in this way.
But Palestinian lives evidently do not concern Mr. Baird. Yes, those Israeli terrorists who burned alive 16-year-old Muhammad Abu Khdeir in Jerusalem are no different from those Islamic State terrorists who beheaded Steven Sotloff in Syria. Those who actively burn mosques and churches in Palestine, and campaign to destroy the Al Aqsa Mosque, are no less terrorists than those who kicked the Christians out of Mosul. But Canada, instead of supporting the application of international law, has decided to encourage Israel to continue with its crimes. As I stated in a letter to Mr. Baird after his meeting in Occupied East Jerusalem: “Canada’s actions are tantamount to complicity in ongoing Israeli violations of the international laws of war.”
We know that the majority of Canadian citizens disagree with their current leadership’s position vis-à-vis Palestine. Some are silent, but others have made their opinions clear, including the thousands who took to the streets of Montreal, Ottawa and Quebec calling for a just and lasting peace.
Mr. Baird is first and foremost doing his country a disservice by contravening its deep commitment to international law and human rights. He is also doing the region a disservice by supporting those forces standing firmly against peace.
Mr. Baird should apologize: It’s never too late!
U of Toronto Aids Canada’s Zionist Attack on Iran
by Anthony Hall
January 7, 2015
The Canadian Government Funds the Peter Munk-Adnan Khashoggi School of Global Affairs at the University of Toronto to Engage in Cyberwarfare on the Islamic Republic of Iran
An Open Letter to U of Toronto President Meric S. Gertler
Dr. and Prof. Meric S. Gertler,
President, University of Toronto
Dear Dr. Gertler:
(7 Jan. 2015) – I spoke earlier today to your executive assistant expressing my consternation that my Alma Mater, the University of Toronto, (Ph.D., History, 1984) is involved through the Munk School of Global Affairs in a federally-funded initiative that adds to the list of serious international aggressions aimed at the Islamic Republic of Iran in recent years. I find it highly unfortunate and disreputable for the University of Toronto to be aiding and abetting what could be conceived as illegal acts circumventing principles of the national sovereignty and international treaties to which Canada is a party.
As you know the Canadian government severed diplomatic relations with Iran in 2012. Under these conditions what the Canadian government and the Munk School describes as “direct diplomacy” can be interpreted as part of a concerted attempt to bring about illegal regime change encouraging sedition in a country with frequent and consequential national elections unlike many of the national polities in the region with whom the Canadian government does have diplomatic relations. These diplomatic relations extend to oversight of arms sales to Saudi Arabia, Bahrain and the other Persian Gulf sheikhdoms.
The Islamic Republic has endured many acts of war including the Israeli-American Stuxnet attacks on Iran’s nuclear energy facilities, repeated assassinations of its nuclear scientists, attacks from Israeli and US-backed terrorist groups including MeK, as well as economic warfare based on specious rationals and justifications cloaked in the language of so-called “sanctions.”
Much of this history is described by Dr. Gareth Porter in Manufactured Crisis: The Untold Story of the Iran Nuclear Scare (Charlottesville Virginia: Just World Book, 2014).
I was able to discuss the book’s contents directly with Dr. Porter when I was in Tehran in late September and early October of 2014 as a Canadian delegate at the New Horizon 2nd International Conference of Independent Thinkers and Film Makers.
Interestingly after making his featured presentations debunking the lies and concocted information fed through agencies like the Munk Centre on the Iranian nuclear program, Dr. Porter chose to criticize some aspects of the conference on BuzzFeed, the same news site utilized by the Israeli government and the Canadian Foreign Affairs Minister, John Baird, in advertising their shared positions.
I note that Minister Baird sees the highly politicized funding to the University of Toronto through the Munk School of Global Affairs as part of Canadian foreign policy initiative directed at “restrictive and repressive environments.”
This characterization seems inconsistent with my experience as a Canadian delegate at a recent conference in Tehran which was far more open to free ranging discussion among experts in their field than anything I could imagine taking place in the repressive intellectual atmosphere of Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s Canada these days. I doubt if the University of Toronto as presently constituted could have hosted anything as erudite and uncensored as the New Horizon proceedings.
In this country the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation and the big media cartels, but especially the Globe and Mail, CTV and the media chain owned by Golden Tree Asset Management in New York, are not free and open environments for broad-ranging discussion from a wide variety of perspectives on current events.
In fact we tend to get constant rehashing of the same set of narrow Israeliocentric interpretations of Canada’s role in the international community as regularly spun out by Prof. Janice Gross Stein and her accomplices at the Munk School of Global Affairs.
The Munk school is the recent creation of Peter Munk whose amassment of a huge fortune is dripping with dark infamy. It is hardly surprising that Mr. Munk seems so desperate to try to buy his way to respectability in order to escape the from the dirt of his financial machinations in the bloody gold mining of Africa and South America as well as in his well-known former partnership with the notorious Saudi Arabian arm’s merchant, Adnan Khashoggi.
Ironically Mr. Munk’s partner was exposed in selling arms to the Islamic Republic of Iran through Israel as revealed in part in the Iran-Contra scandal. The irony of the Munk School’s new variation on the current extension of the Iran-Contra is worthy of note. So too is the willingness of the ethically challenged University of Toronto to accept funding from apparently any questionable source no matter how drenched in dubious dealings.
Prof. Stein refers to federal funding for “a digital public square… designed for citizens who cannot come together in safety to exchange ideas about the future of their country.” Unfortunately this phrase can be appropriately applied to Canada under the oppressiveness of the Harper-Baird regime, an election-fraud government whose policies are actively promoted by the University of Toronto through the Munk den of political manipulators and spin doctors.
The failure of academic freedom in Canada, for instance, is on international display in the firing of tenured full professor of Physics, Denis Rancourt, formerly of the University of Ottawa. Prof Rancourt has been the target of University of Ottawa president Allan Rock who makes clear the priority the former Liberal cabinet minister attaches to his own political commitment to the Zionist ideology of the Jewish state above all else. The repressiveness of Canada is expressed through existing and forthcoming so-called hate speech laws about to be tested in the trial of RadicalPress.com publisher Arthur Topham.
Clearly Press TV based in Tehran provides a venue for free and open debate concerning many topics, including the domestic and international politics of Canada, that is far more open and uncensored than the narrow range of discourse allowed on venues like the state broadcasting corporation the CBC, The Globe and Mail and the National Post. While I am not arguing that the government of the Islamic Republic of Iran is perfect in every respect, I know of no human rights violations there that even approaches the scale of the Missing and Murdered Aboriginal Women Scandal in Canada which the Harper-Baird regime has repeatedly and explicitly refused to investigate formally.
The University of Toronto should not be meddling in the internal politics of any sovereign country including the Islamic Republic of Iran. If my Alma Mater insists on taking some action to improve the tone and substance Canadian-Iranian relations, it should be by bringing pressure on the Canadian government to restore formal diplomatic relations with Iran.
Anthony J. Hall
Professor of Globalization Studies
University of Lethbridge, Alberta
cc: Reza Montazama, Iranian Ministry of Foreign Affairs Nader Talebzadeh, Iranian broadcaster, film maker, a Chair of the New Horzon Conference Hamid Reza, Press TV, Tehran Joshua Blakeney, Canadian Correspondent, Press TV Thomas Walkom, Columnist, Toronto Star Janice Stein, Munk School of Global Affairs Denis Rancourt, Tenured
Physicist Fired by the University of Ottawa Michelle Robinson. Liberal Party Riding President
Looking for a way to talk to Iran, Ottawa backs ‘direct diplomacy’
OTTAWA — The Globe and Mail
Published Tuesday, Jan. 06 2015
Ottawa is putting more money into a project aimed at communicating directly with Iranian citizens as it looks to apply a similar strategy in other countries including Russia and parts of Iraq and Syria.
The Conservative government is set to announce new funding on Tuesday for a “direct diplomacy” project run by the University of Toronto’s Munk School of Global Affairs.
First launched during the lead-up to Iran’s 2013 presidential elections, the project was touted as a method for bypassing Tehran and offering a platform for dissidents and human-rights activists in the country.
The expansion of the direct diplomacy project comes as other countries, including the United States and Britain, seek to re-engage with the Iranian government.
Since the project’s launch, the Munk School has developed online tools such as the Rouhani Meter, which tracks which reform promises have been fulfilled by Iranian President Hassan Rouhani, and the Majlis Monitor, which attempts to measure the performance of Iranian parliamentarians.
The project, called the Global Dialogue on the Future of Iran, also provides technology designed to get around online censorship, and has launched YouTube and Twitter accounts in Farsi.
Janice Stein, professor at the Munk School, said the next phase will involve the creation of a “digital public square” that will bring together the tools that have already been established, create new ones and expand the project’s reach into other countries and regions.
“It’s about making space for multiple narratives, it’s about making space for different voices,” Ms. Stein said. “And it is a strongly held proposition, supported by a lot of good research, that societies who make space for a variety of voices do better at almost everything.”
A Canadian government official said that while Iran would remain a focal point for the digital diplomacy project, its expansion would allow the Munk School to look at other locations where a similar strategy could be used, such as Russia and Islamic State-controlled regions of Iraq and Syria.
The official said future projects could include platforms to help people access restricted websites and generate “counter-narratives” that could challenge the message of a repressive regime.
Critics of the approach have argued that Ottawa has focused too much on circumventing Tehran and should look instead at reopening the Canadian embassy and establishing a dialogue with Mr. Rouhani’s government. Canada suspended diplomatic ties with Iran in 2012.
Ms. Stein said she doesn’t view her school’s efforts and traditional diplomacy as mutually exclusive.
She said some of the tools the Munk School has developed include technology that can be used to get around a firewall, allowing people to access websites they might otherwise be barred from.
The focus of the project will continue to be Iran, but there is “lots of discussion” about working in Russia, Ms. Stein said, adding that journalists and civil society groups in that country are increasingly at risk.
In western Syria and northern Iraq, Ms. Stein said there may be opportunities to help people in Islamic State-controlled areas to access the Internet safely and communicate with each other.
MORE RELATED TO THIS STORY
Canada’s Foreign Affairs department tries its hand at BuzzFeed
Canadian government pledges $9M in efforts to circumvent other countries Internet censorship
Stewart Bell | January 6, 2015 4:56 PM ETMore from Stewart Bell | @StewartBellNP
Canadian Foreign Affairs Minister John Baird announced the start of The Digital Public Square, at The University of Toronto’s, The Munk School of Global Affairs, in Toronto, Tuesday January 6, 2015.
TORONTO — The Canadian government expanded its “direct diplomacy” efforts on Tuesday, pledging $9-million for a project that aims to help citizens circumvent Internet restrictions imposed by their governments.
Foreign Affairs Minister John Baird said the partnership with the University of Toronto’s Munk School of Global Affairs would open up online spaces for political dialogue within “restrictive and repressive environments.”
Building on an existing initiative focused exclusively on Iran, the project would “increase digital space for free expression,” allowing citizens to stay informed, share their opinions and advocate for their rights, he said.
“We believe that citizens of all countries must be able to express themselves freely, to hold their governments to account as well as to exchange information and ideas,” the minister said, announcing the funding at the Munk School.
“The internet is a game-changing technology on these issues. It has the ability to empower individuals more than any other technology before it. This scares some people in power and so regimes around the world.”
In its latest annual report on Internet freedom, the U.S.-based non-profit Freedom House said it had declined in 2014 for the fourth consecutive year as online censorship and monitoring became increasing aggressive and sophisticated.
Countries were “rapidly adopting new laws that legitimize existing repression and effectively criminalize online dissent,” it said. As a result, more people than ever were being arrested for the things they had posted online.
“Blocking and filtering — once the most widespread methods of censorship — are still very common, but many countries now prefer to simply imprison users who post undesirable content, thereby deterring others and encouraging self-censorship,” it said.
Prof. Janice Gross Stein of the Munk School said the government funding would finance a “digital public square … designed for citizens who cannot come together in safety to exchange ideas about the future of their country.”
The school also plans to conduct online polling on issues and report the results. “Why does that matter? Because they cannot come together in safe and open discussion to talk about what their fellow citizens think and to share ideas. That’s such a fundamental right, it’s so important to the fabric of our life in this country that we take it for granted, but it’s not something that many, many, many around the world share.”
Mr. Baird did not list the countries that could be targeted by the project, but Freedom House said the biggest crackdowns on online freedom had occurred in Russia and Turkey.
“Just this weekend there were reports of a Russian store clerk being investigated by Russian authorities simply because she was open minded enough to share links to a couple of Ukrainian documentaries on her social networking pages,” Mr. Baird said. “Canada is deeply concerned about these growing trends.”
Iran, Syria, China, Cuba and Ethiopia are also possible candidates since they are at the bottom of the Freedom House online freedom rankings. Saudi Arabia and Pakistan are among the ten worst, while Canada ranks third best, below Iceland and Estonia.
Governments are increasingly turning to the Internet to promote their foreign policy goals. The U.S. is now using Twitter to discredit ISIS, and North Korea was recently accused of hacking Sony to force the cancellation of a Hollywood movie that lampooned Supreme Leader Kim Jong Un.
Canada’s strategy is more benign: to undermine authoritarian regimes by undermining the online monitoring and censorship that helps keep them in power. Mr. Baird said Canada was “engaging in what we call direct diplomacy with civic leaders and political actors, including online influencers, to help support them in their work, to effect positive political change where they live.”
Embracing Truth: Elizabeth May, Green Party of Canada, 9/11 and the Politics of Denial by Monika Schaefer with Preface by Arthur Topham
Embracing Truth: Elizabeth May, Green Party of Canada, 9/11 and the Politics of Denial
An Open Letter to MP Elizabeth May from former Green Party candidate Monika Schaefer
by Arthur Topham
There is a clear and present psychological disconnect between the world-wide Zionist Jew controlled media – often referred to as the “corporate/mainstream media or simply the msm” – and the world of truth, reality and common sense, which, thanks to the birth of the internet, has not been fully obliterated by the overpowering presence and influence of the controlled Zionist press.
Nowhere is this deliberate disconnect more clearly emphasized and exemplified than in the December 4, 2015 CTV news story titled “Elizabeth May presents ’9/11 truther’ petition to Parliament” by CTVNews.ca’s Jesse Tahirali wherein the writer kick-starts their thinly veiled diatribe against Canada’s solitary Green Party member of parliament and the petitioners themselves with the following lead sentence, “Green Party Leader Elizabeth May put forward a bizarre petition in the House of Commons Wednesday asking the government to support a popular 9/11 conspiracy theory.”
While seemingly an innocuous opening statement the truth of the matter is that Tahirail immediately attacks the petition as being “bizarre”, i.e. eccentric, fantastic, grotesque, half barbaric, etc. and then automatically lumps it into the commonly coded Zionist phraseology of being nothing but a “conspiracy theory”.
In other words, according to CTVNews, the issue isn’t about the growing awareness and knowledge of thousands, if not millions, of people worldwide, who, given the irrefutable evidence of cover up which has now, metaphorically speaking, grown to the height of the former Twin Towers and points to massive deception on the part of the American government’s National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States, also known as the 9/11 Commission, first established by President George W. Bush back in 2002 but merely the fact that a member of Canada’s parliament actually displayed the audacity to present a petition on behalf of these great unwashed 9/11 apostates who are asking the Canadian government to conduct a parliamentary review into the events that occurred in the United States on September 11, 2001.
May, who likely spent many a night ‘sleepless in Ottawa’ tossing and turning on her pillow thinking about the petition and the repercussions of presenting it to parliament, is to be lauded for eventually garnering the fortitude necessary to have made the right decision on behalf of concerned Canadians, truth and the democratic process itself. It set a precedent, not only in Canada but around the globe, and also brought into vivid focus the indisputable realization that the mainstream media is not a medium for dispensing neutral, impartial facts and news but rather the most insidious, dangerous, and indispensable device in the arsenal of Zion’s mind-control weaponry; one crucial to projecting and protecting the lies and illusions that the globalist Zionist cartel depends upon to support its infrastructure of terror.
The rub, of course, in all of this (and the legal loophole too) was the fact that May, while doing her democratic duty to the electorate, also made the decision to distance herself and the Green Party of Canada from any formal endorsement of the petition itself; an act which has precipitated even further controversy and concern amongst those who believe that the Green Party of Canada should have, on principle, taken the position of the petitioners and the overwhelming evidence supporting the charge of a 9/11 deception and stood up for the truth regardless of whatever flak the Zionist media undoubtedly would have responded with.
The essence of dissatisfaction with May’s decision is best presented in the following Open Letter to MP Elizabeth May from Monika Shaefer, a friend of May and a former Green Party candidate in the riding of Yellowhead, Alberta who was a veteran of several federal elections in a row. As explained to me in our correspondence, for the next election Monika was planning to run on a 9/11 truth platform. When she informed Elizabeth May of her plans she was told that would be fine, as long as she also talked about Green Party policies.
In the interim period an event transpired that seriously affected Monika Schaefer’s future plans. That event was the revelation in the msm that the then President of the Green Party of Canada, Paul Estrin, was a closet Zionist making public statements on Facebook and on the official Green Party website in support of the genocidal actions of the state of Israel during their 2014 summer bombing and terrorist siege of Gaza, Palestine. Interested readers can review that issue here where I covered the story back on July 30th.
Like many Greens Monika Schaefer was extremely unsettled and disturbed by this sudden turn of events and in a letter to May dated August 5th, 2014, expressed her concerns about the Estrin affair. Below are some quotes from her letter:
“The Paul Estrin story is an issue which surely has caused you to lose sleep. It is indeed very heavy. I hope that by sharing my thoughts and insights with you, I can help to bring clarity to what must be done.
“It is abundantly clear to me from Paul Estrin’s controversial article entitled “Why Gaza Makes Me Sad”, that he is a Zionist shill, and will destroy the Green Party of Canada from within. It is of critical importance that he be expelled from his position of Party President immediately.
“. . . Paul Estrin’s silence on Israel at the Green Party Convention, followed by the publication of his article on the Green Party website, is not just a coincidence or an innocent oversight on his part. He has one goal – eviscerate and thereby destroy the Green Party of Canada.
“. . . The Zionists are in their end-game now and they are playing the stakes high. We see this by their current behaviour in Gaza, and we have seen it in the form of various false-flag terror operations over the years. These were meant to bring about the New World Order by means of the fraudulent War on Terror and by means of implementation of a police-state domestically. False-flag operations, the biggest one being 911, are carried out with the express purpose of accelerating their all-or-nothing end-game.
“They have taken control of most of our major institutions, including the media, the banks, and the government. They control the secret societies, which do not receive much attention (of course not – they are secret!), but whose influence penetrate deeply into our society. It is clear that they control all the major political parties, not just the one in power, but also the larger opposition parties. Now they are going for the Green Party as well.
“While it is true that Paul Estrin was elected Party President by the membership, there was never disclosure about who Paul Estrin really is. I may even have voted for him myself – I don’t remember now. Even you, Elizabeth, were (by your own admission) unaware of what he really stands for.
“He was groomed to rise to an influential position. Then when the time was right, mere days after the GPC convention, and during the current Israeli war against the Palestinians, he let loose with his diatribe, filled with lies and hate, on behalf of a supremacist cult….
“It is time to free ourselves of the shackles of Zionism. In the teachings of the Talmud, we the goyim are lower than cattle, and we are quickly becoming enslaved. In Canada we have been particularly susceptible to being brainwashed and controlled by this powerful force, precisely because we have grown up in such an open society, in which we were taught about good democratic ideals and peace and justice, and that we in Canada embodied all those wonderful values. Who would have thought that such a dark force could be in our midst.
“No one need feel embarrassed for not understanding what has happened. The perpetrators have pulled out all the stops for maintaining mass deception. It took until 10 years post-911 before I really began to understand, and that was only because a close relative steered me in the direction of truth – for that I am grateful.
“Thank you so much for reading, listening, and hearing. I am confident you will do the right thing, and show Paul Estrin the exit door.
“your friend always,
As Monika later relates, “Lo-and-behold a by-election was called in my riding of Yellowhead, Alberta in October of 2014 but because of the letter regarding Paul Estrin I was rejected by the GPC as a candidate. Elizabeth May told me I could apologize to Paul for the letter, thereby making it “go away”. I refused, because that would have been the beginning of the road to compromise on truth.”
With this preface completed I now present Monika Schaefer’s recent letter to Elizabeth May regarding the 9/11 petition which she tabled in the Canadian parliament but publicly distanced herself and her party from. The Subject line of Schaefer’s letter was titled, “Embracing Truth”.
First I would like to thank you again for making the principled decision to table the ReThink911 petition on behalf of the many citizens who are clamouring for truth and clarity in unraveling the staggering events of September 11th, 2001.
I am writing now with my fervent plea for you to embrace 9/11 truth and not distance yourself from it, for the good of the planet and for the triumph of light over darkness. This is not a trivial single-stakeholder issue concerning a remote event. 9/11 is the Achilles heel of the hidden power that is steering this world into perpetual war, the so-called “war on terror”. A grand deception has taken place and all of our institutions are participating in this deception, including the mainstream media (MSM) and our government. This includes every single Member of Parliament, as they have all been silenced on this matter.
All of our MPs have been rendered impotent while the perpetrators of the crime of 9/11 continue their game. And it would not matter how many Green Party MPs would be elected, 1 or 12 or 50 or 250, those MPs would still not have any significant effect while the “hidden government” rules. That hidden power is what will silence you and all the others on what is really going on.
You will gain the support of many citizens in publicly denouncing the official version of 9/11. It is the MSM that will attack you. Please understand that the same cabal that brought us 9/11 own and control the MSM. In the “Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion” they call the press the Great Power.
In the 16th century, it was heretical to proclaim that the earth was round. Giordano Bruno was executed for saying this but today he is regarded a hero. His execution did not make the earth flat. Today it is heretical to question the official conspiracy story of 9/11. As with the flat earth theory, it does not make the prevailing story true.
The most important question to ask after a crime is “cui bono?”. Certainly the Muslims worldwide did not benefit from 9/11. One also needs to ask why and by whom you were attacked for tabling the petition. If their version was true, they could and would simply prove it. A petition asking for clarification of inconsistencies would be no big deal. Most petitions do not make the news. The fact that you were attacked for tabling this particular petition raises another red flag that there is something to hide. I think you understand this.
The non-investigation of what actually happened on 9/11 was deliberate, and constituted a crime in and of itself. Many obvious mistakes were made however, and it behoves us to open our eyes. For example several MSM outlets reported WTC7 to have fallen 20 minutes before it actually fell. Someone got the timing of the script terribly wrong. There is also the case of the 5 dancing Israelis, who later reported on Israeli television that they had been in New York “to document the event”. This requires foreknowledge. Yet the criminals belligerently perpetuate the lies.
Elizabeth, as long as we the people cower in silence, as long as we fear the retributions of speaking the truth about 9/11, they will maintain their power. Nothing any of us do for other causes, be it climate change or poverty, will make much difference, because we are not in control of our affairs. We have become enslaved to the hidden power, the perpetrators of the crime.
There will come a tipping point for the truth to prevail. Perhaps it will take someone of your fame and stature to tell the world that the official story of 9/11 is nothing but a pack of lies. I implore you to consider your legacy Elizabeth. Please do not come down on the wrong side of history. History will judge us by which road we traveled when we were faced with the truth about 9/11. You are extremely intelligent, and yet you say publicly you do not agree with the petition. It makes no sense, other than for political expediency. You have told me your goal is to have 12 Green MPs thereby gaining the balance of power in a possible minority government after the next election. If you need to compromise on this truth to achieve that goal, then of what use will those 12 MPs really be? They will all have to toe the line of what the hidden power dictates. And dictate they will. They already dictate a false narrative about the false flag terror attack of 9/11. This is the premise for the wars abroad and the erosion of our democracy at home. The false flag events continue and the MSM carry on deceiving us.
You have always said you speak truth to power. This is when it really counts. How we handle 9/11 truth is a powerful litmus test to demonstrate that the Green Party is not just one of the “grey” parties (as we like to call the rest of the parties). Embrace the petition for 9/11 truth, and the Greens truly are different than the Greys.
We urgently need to expose the fraud and bring sanity and peace to a deeply troubled world. This is about preventing WW III. This is about regaining control over our own destiny, and yes, that includes the ability to address the environmental issues which threaten our very future. Let 2015 be the year of light, not darkness.
With deep respect and humility,
~ The End ~
CLICK HERE TO VIEW VIDEO:
Editors Note: 86 year old German Ursula Haverbeck identifies the root source of much of the problems that the world faces with respect to history and truth and the greatest lie ever foisted upon humankind – a lie that is directly responsible for the creation of Canada’s so-called “Hate Propaganda” laws sec. 318 to 320 of the Canadian Criminal Code which ultimately led to my arrest and incarceration in May of 2012. This “Greatest Problem” is crucial to a proper understanding of Canada’s civil and human rights. The “Holocaust Lie” is now a proven fraud of massive proportions for which the Zionist Jews are directly responsible.
Kill the Germans! Kill the Germans: An Open Letter to the Marshfield, Wisconsin School Board by Christine Miller
December 10, 2014
Letter to the Marshfield School Board:
Several weeks ago while flipping through the TV channels I suddenly heard: Kill the Germans, kill the Germans, kill the Germans. It came from Wisconsin Public TV and was from a scene used as advertisement for the coming attraction “Escape from a Nazi death camp.” Lately I have noticed that Wisconsin Public TV is having more and more anti German programs. These programs are funded by foundations, most of them with Jewish names. It is a truism: Whose money I take whose song I sing. All the channels, but especially Wisconsin Public TV are singing a Jewish song and You, the members of the Marshfield School Board are merrily humming along.
Last year three candidates were running for election to the School Board: Amber Leifheit, Mark Konrardy and Jason Angell. A forum was held at the Senior High School. My question to the candidates was: In the Marshfield elementary school libraries are innumerable Holocaust books. These books contain faked pictures (a Nazi cutting off the beard of a rabbi ) and faked captions. I enclose the picture of the dead concentration camp inmates of Nordhausen.
This photo first appeared in Life magazine July 1945 and found its way into the book WWII which is in the elementary school libraries at Granton and Madison. Nordhausen was bombed by the USAF April 4, 1945. If you look closely at the photo you can make out the destroyed buildings in the background. The dead were not the victims of the Germans, but the Americans. My question was: Do you think it is appropriate for these books to stay in the elementary school libraries? Mr. Angell answer was: The books should stay. Ms. Leifheit seconded the answer. Mr. Konrardy equivocated.
Last year the school board eliminated the German language from it curriculum. The reason given was budgetary constraints, and since German had the lowest enrollment of the three languages being taught, Spanish, French and German, German had to go. If you put a sponge in the water and expect it not to get wet, you are stupid. If you expect kids to want to learn German with the continued anti German atrocity propaganda starting in our grade schools, then again, you are stupid.
1976 saw the first printing of Arthur Butz’s The Hoax of the Twentieth Century.
Hollywood sprang into action with damage control and made the TV series: The Holocaust. Do I guess right saying that you never read Butz’s book but were glued to the tube watching The Holocaust? Our youngest son was in third grade at that time. Every day for a week he came home crying, did not want to go to school anymore because he was mercilessly bullied. Kids knew he had a German born mother. Spare me therefore your anti bullying programs. They were not for my kids.
About a month ago I listen to Putin’s speech (on the Internet) which Putin gave to the German parliament. He gave it in accent free, perfect German. He stressed the close and beneficial cooperation between Russia and Germany through the centuries. He mentioned the fact that the first German unification (1871) was only possible with the good will of the czar. The second partial unification (1989) was the work of Gorby.
Remember back to 1962, or the beginning of l963. There were two space programs, the Vanguard, headed by an American Team and the Redstone program headed by Wernher von Braun. The Vanguard rockets fizzled. I still remember Kennedy appearing on TV accompanied by von Braun. Kennedy gave von Braun and his German team the go ahead.
After von Braun had died the Apollo program was headed by Arthur Rudolph, another of the German space scientists. The moon landing was successful. But now the Office of Special Investigation sprang into action. The OSI is a Jewish construct created to ferret out Nazis because Nazis are automatically considered “war criminals.” The OSI gave Rudolph a choice: Leave this country, or face a war crime trial. Rudolph left for Germany. A few years later he wanted to visit his daughter and his grandchildren in California. He applied for a visa: the visa was denied. The Russians also had “recruited” their contingent of German space scientists. After their job was done they were honored and dismissed with the good wishes of the Soviet government.
Right now horrible things are happening in Gaza. I can see the pale little faces of the dead Palestinian children.
They look so peaceful that I cannot feel sorry for them. But the mangled little bodies of the children still alive sear my memory. Are you looking?
I don’t think so. The cowards prefer to fight the real or perceived injustices of the past. Your memory is with the “Holocaust victims.” You pretend to be patriots. But you patriotism is a farce, for you are nothing more than Judea’s Willing Executioners.
Christine B. Miller
Dear Radical Readers, Friends and Supporters,
Another year draws to an end. It was tumultuous as the year before and the one before that and given the trend over the past two decades 2015 will, in all likelihood, be one of greater challenges and, hopefully, greater opportunities to bring about some of the serious changes that need to happen if we’re ever to get our nation back on course.
I want to extend my sincerest thanks and appreciation to all of those who have, in one way or another, helped me over the past year in order that I could carry on with my battle to win the legal case that I’ve been purposely dragged into by those forces within our country who are hell-bent on trying to destroy the civil rights and the freedoms that we grew up with and have cherished throughout our lives.
The controversial issue of political Zionism has, over the past seven years that I’ve been wrapped up in defending myself from its relentless attacks, now grown into a world-wide problem and in the case of Canada, exacerbated beyond comprehension by the treasonous and dangerous actions of our present federal Conservative government and its leader Stephen Harper.
Canadians, for the first time in history, are now coming to the realization that their nation has been taken over by a foreign entity whose headquarters is in Tel Aviv, Israel and that the leaders of every official federal party are all marching to the distant drum beat of the same Zionist taskmaster and leading our nation to war and terrorism and greater losses of personal freedoms rather than dedicating their lives to the people of Canada who elected them to lead the nation to peace and prosperity.
While I’m not a pessimist by nature I am a realist when it comes to weighing the options and giving due consideration to what sort of future we can look forward to in the year ahead. Given that the traitor and war criminal Harper will want to be re-elected for yet another disastrous term in office and given his record of deception and his zealous obeisance to the demands of the Jewish lobbyists here in Canada and their bosses in Israel, the nation can expect any type of despicable action to arise in order for this shameful excuse for a Prime Minister to get himself re-elected in 2015. We’ve already witnessed the trial run in term of false flags with the infamous Ottawa Shooting incident and the subsequent introduction of greater powers to CSIS (aka Cheka) and other law enforcement agencies all of which are designed to create greater fear and insecurity in the population and provide openings through which more and more repressive laws can be enacted to prevent the people from either questioning the actions of their representatives or discussing the people and organizations who are currently influencing our elected members of parliament to behave in the manner that they are.
2015 will also be the year that my trial on the trumped-up “Hate Propaganda” charges under Sec. 319(2) of Canada’s Criminal Code will take place in Quesnel, British Columbia beginning on October 26th and running through to November 6th. Whether I have legal representation by then will depend upon my ability to raise many thousands of dollars in order to cover the costs of hiring counsel. The way things are unfolding at this time I’m not overly optimistic that I’ll succeed in raising the amount required but it’s still too far off to give up on the possibility that it might actually happen. In the worst case it would mean that I would have to defend myself, something that I’d rather not do but all else failing I will take on regardless.
There’s no doubt left at all in my mind that if I lose this battle over my right to freedom of expression that the powers that be will have accomplished what they set out to do; that is, create a legal precedent with which to then go on criminally charging other Canadian bloggers and publishers and writers who, like myself, are publishing the truth about what’s going on in Canada and around the globe when it comes to the actions of World Jewry and all of its subsidiary Zionist organizations, be they advocacy groups, banking cartels, corporate entities or media monopolies, all of which are playing a diabolical roll in turning our world into a nightmare of bloodshed and fear and insecurity and environmental degradation.
Silencing the alternative media is essential for the criminal cartel that wants to control all aspects of our lives and Canada’s “Hate Propaganda” legislation is the only means left to these power-hungry plutocrats who care naught about basic human values or morals and only want the electorate to remain obedient to their laws and not question their assumed authority.
Without criminalizing truth they know their chances of controlling the people grow slimmer with each passing day. The Internet now has become the most powerful tool on the planet for dispensing information and those in power understand that if they don’t get full control of it that the masses will continue to wake up at exponential rates threatening their feigned right to rule over us.
But, given all of this, it’s far from certain that they’ll accomplish their devious plans. Here in Canada we’re still sheltered to a great degree by our distance from most of the turmoil that besets much of the world and it’s going to take some pretty traumatic events to force the majority of people to rethink and react in ways they aren’t used to. God grant that we won’t be subjected to massive false flag events like we’re seeing in other parts of the world and also that our foolhardy PM doesn’t succeed in bringing home to Canada all of the woes that his government is bestowing on other foreign nations that only benefit the Zionist state of Israel.
And so my deepest wishes go out to all of you that we will gain in knowledge and wisdom and strength as the new year progresses and that our actions, both individual and collective, will in some way help improve our quality of life and stem the tide of environmental destruction that threatens us all.
May God bless and guide us in the times ahead.
HP – the Jews make huge profits from having their enemies kill each other in wars small and large which they have contrived, then pose as victims wherever possible (e.g. of “extermination, terrorism and anti-Semitism or whatever) to scam more mega-billions in the aftermath, all without fear of exposure since they own the media and have bought the politicians. Individual Compensation claims against Germany were often transparently false or greatly exaggerated (for example where low-class Polish ghetto Jews allegedly lost expensive cars and works of art) but the Germans had no alternative but to pay up to avoid charges of “Naziism” and “anti-Semitism” which can destroy any German bureaucrat’s career. IV
December 14, 2014
Robert Fulford’s article on “returning” valuable works of European art to their supposedly rightful Jewish owners is more than a tad ironic, given the circumstances in which the Jews’ plundered most of the art in the first place from impoverished, distressed German owners during the hyper-inflation following WWI.
The Jews paid only a very small fraction of the value of the works, yet now claim that they themselves should be compensated for the allegedly improvident prices they received when they sold the art a few years later to finance their emigration from Germany. These wealthy “refugees” were permitted to depart with their personal property and to retain ownership of what they left behind. Since they had access to other markets there was no reason to accept less than the market values prevailing at the time. If some of the art was acquired by senior members of the Nazi Party, probably they were simply the highest bidders.
Anecdotally, an elderly gentleman who worked as a restorer in an Amsterdam gallery through the War years told me that SS Officers were their favourite clients since they always paid “top price” (hardly the Fulford-depicted “thieves who stole every masterpiece that wasn’t nailed down”, an accusation applicable to American soldiers). He told me also that the Gallery owner had kept safely a large collection belonging to a wealthy Jewess and provided her, at great personal risk and expense, with a comfortable hiding place until liberation. Because of the high cost of buying her food on the black market he eventually had to sell one of her minor paintings – for which initiative the grateful Jewess sued him for restitution after the Occupation ended.
The hyper-inflation in Germany following WWI enabled war-enriched Jews with dollars and pounds sterling also to buy valuable real estate for pennies on the dollar which they did with avaricious gusto. By the time the National Socialists came to power they owned about a third of German real estate including virtually all the country’s commercial properties. They were not forcibly dispossessed by the Nazis and as late of 1941 still held the major share.
It is a gross anomaly and injustice that Jews have been richly compensated for contrived “losses” resulting from the war which they themselves fomented, while the genuine German victims, who selflessly fought International Communism to a standstill at tremendous sacrifice on our behalf, far from receiving compensation, are forced to pay their traditional enemies who brought on their destruction.
Ian V. Macdonald
Arnold J. Toynbee’s Foreward to The Palestine Diary 1914 – 1945 by Robert John and Sami Hadawi (1970)
Arnold J. Toynbee’s Foreward to The Palestine Diary 1914 – 1945
by Robert John and Sami Hadawi (1970)
‘DIARY’ IS A MODEST TITLE for this massive work. It is a detailed narrative covering the history of Palestine during the period running from the outbreak of the First World War to the declaration of the establishment of the state of Israel and the outbreak of the First Arab-Israeli War in 1948. The narrative is supported by a very full documentation. As far as I know, so full an assemblage of pertinent documents is not to be found between the covers of any previous publication. The sub-titles are also apposite. The story is a tragedy, and the essence of this tragedy is that about 1,500,000 Palestinian Arabs have now become refugees as a result of the intervention of foreign powers in their country’s affairs. The might of these foreign poets has been irresistible, and the evicted Palestinian Arabs have been forcibly deprived of their country, their homes, and their property without having been allowed to have a voice in the determination of their own destiny.
Though the facts are public, there is a widespread ignorance of them in the Western World and, above all, in the United States, the Western country which has had, and is still having, the greatest say in deciding Palestine’s fate. The United States has the greatest say, but the United Kingdom bears the heaviest load of responsibility. The Balfour Declaration of 2nd November 1917 was the winning card in a sordid contest between the two sets of of belligerents in the First World War for winning the support of the Jews in Germany, Austria-Hungary, and – most important of all – in the United States.
In promising to give the Jews ‘a national home’ in Palestine, the British Government was, I believe, using deliberately ambiguous language. As a citizen of the United Kingdom, I declare this belief of mine with feelings of shame and contrition, but I do believe that this is the truth. Throughout out the First World War and after it, the Government of the United Kingdom was playing a double game. Perhaps a lawyer might be able to plead plausibly that there was no inconsistency between the respective pledges that Britain gave to the Arabs and to the Zionists, or between the inclusion of the Balfour Declaration in the text of the mandate taken by Britain for the administration of Palestine and the classification of this mandate in the ‘A’ class –a class in which the mandatory power was committed to giving the people of the mandated territory their independence at the earliest date at which they would be capable of standing on their own feet. Whatever the casuists might say, laymen – Arabs or Jews – would, I think, naturally infer, bona fide, from the British Government’s various statements and acts that it had made two commitments that were incompatible with each other.
At the same time when the mandate was drafted, offered, and accepted, the Arab Palestinians amounted to more than 90 per cent of the population of the country. The mandate for Palestine was an ‘A’ mandate, and, as I interpret the Hussein-McMahon correspondence, Palestine had not been excepted by the British Government from the area in which they had pledged themselves to King Hussein to recognize and support Arab independence. The Palestinian Arabs could therefore reasonably assume that Britain was pledged to prepare Palestine for becoming an independent Arab state. On the other side, the Zionists naturally saw, in the British promise of ‘a homeland’ in Palestine, the entering wedge for the insertion into Palestine of the Jewish state of Israel which was in fact inserted there in 1948.
To my mind, the most damaging point in the charge-sheet against my country is that Britain was in control of Palestine for thirty years – 1918-19148 – and that during those fateful three decades she never made up her mind, or at any rate never declared, what her policy about the future of Palestine was. All through those thirty years, Britain lived from hand to mouth, admitting into Palestine, year by year, a quota of Jewish immigrants that varied according to the strength of the respective pressures of the Arabs and Jews at the time. Those immigrants could not have come in if they had not been shielded by a British Chevaux-de-frise. If Palestine had remained under Ottoman Turkish rule, or if it had become an independent Arab state in 1918, Jewish immigrants would never have been admitted into Palestine in large enough numbers to enable them to overwhelm the Palestine Arabs in this Arab people’s own country. The reason why the state of Israel exists today and why today 1,500,000 Palestinian Arabs are refugees is that, for thirty years, Jewish immigration was imposed on the Palestinian Arabs by British military power until the immigrants were sufficiently numerous and sufficiently well-armed to be able to fend for themselves with tanks and planes of their own. The tragedy in Palestine is not just a local one; it is a tragedy for the World, because it is an injustice that is a menace to the World’s peace. Britain’s guilt is not diminished by the humiliating fact that she is now impotent to redress the wrong that she has done.
As an Englishman I hate to have to indict my country, but I believe that Britain deserves to be indicted, and this is the only personal reparation that I can make. I hope this book will be read widely in the United States, and this by Jewish as well as by non-Jewish Americans. The United States Government’s policy on the Palestinian question has been a reflexion of American public feeling and opinion. The opinion that has generated the feeling has been formed to a large extent in ignorance of the facts. If the American people are willing to open their minds to the truth about Palestine, this book will help them to learn it. If they do learn the truth, I hope this will lead them to change their minds, and if the American people do change their minds, I feel sure that their Government will change its policy to match. If the American Government were to be constrained by American public opinion to take a non-partisan line over Palestine, the situation in Palestine might quickly change for the better. Is this too much to hope for? We cannot tell, but at least it is certain that the present book will be enlightening for any reader whose mind is open to conviction.
1st June 1968
A. J. Toynbee
UN General Assembly: Israel’s actions in Jerusalem are null and void
The United Nations General Assembly adopted six resolutions regarding Israeli occupied territories through a recorded vote last night, addressing the areas of Jerusalem and the Syrian Golan.
In terms of Jerusalem, the Assembly voted on a resolution confirming that all legislative and administrative measures taken by Israel to change the legal status of the Holy City of Jerusalem are null and void.
The decision was supported by a recorded vote of 144 countries in favour, six countries opposed, namely Canada, Israel, Marshall Islands, Micronesia, Palau and United States, while ten countries abstained from the vote (Australia, Cameroon, Central African Republic, Madagascar, Panama, Papua New Guinea, Paraguay, Togo and Tonga and Vanuatu).
The Assembly also adopted a resolution that stressed the need for Israel, the occupying power, to withdraw from the occupied Palestinian territories, and demanded the complete cessation of all Israeli settlement activity and Israel’s compliance with its obligations under international law.
The Assembly’s decision also outlined the need for delivering humanitarian and medical aid to the Palestinians.
Another decision was implemented regarding the Syrian Golan Heights as a result of the Assembly’s concern for Israel’s lack of compliance with Resolution 497 (issued in 1981) calling on Israel to withdraw its forces from the Golan Heights which have been illegally occupied since 1967. The decision was supported by 99 countries, rejected by six, while 57 (mostly European) countries abstained from the vote.
We can only sit and wonder when some Apartheid-Zionist-Jewish-Israel-loving nation will blow this out of the water, just as Israel tried to blow the USS Liberty out of the water in June, 1967. Will it be the United States applying its veto?
And just look at the nations controlled by the grubby little bribe takers: Stephen Harper of Canada and Australia’s Tony Abbott, who either voted against the six resolutions, or abstained; openly admitting that land-theft and prisoner-of-war slaying are permissible, as long as the Jewish State of Israel can cloak them in some kind of constitutionally fraudulent legalese.
Shame on them!
And look at their expressions. What are they thinking?
“This should be worth a nice a good-sized packet of Shekels.”
Anthony Lawson — with thanks to aletho for bringing it to my notice.
* * *
Only fools believe what they are told, when it is clear that much else is being hidden.
KARMA: Ezra Levant, Zionism & the Politics of Deception
“What goes around comes around”
~ modern-day English expression to describe the Buddhist Law of Karma
The recent November 27, 2014 guilty ruling by Justice Wendy Matheson in the defamation lawsuit against Sun News Network’s Zionist Jew propagandist Ezra Levant by Khurrum Awan a Muslim Canadian lawyer came for many as a surprise and a grave disappointment.
What this reflects for those caught up in the deceptive rhetoric of Ezra Levant and his background support network of international Jewry (and those not), is that there are within that sector of people paying attention to Canadian and global politics, two schools of thought when it comes to the issue of freedom of speech or expression; one that sees Levant as the leading spokesperson for freedom of speech and another which views his actions or behaviour as that of the proverbial Trojan Horse – interposed within the Jew media monopoly in order to serve the needs, not of Canada, but of the Israeli agenda which, ultimately, means the ideology of Zionism.
One aspect of the case which emerged and that played a crucial role in determining to what extent Levant had defamed Khurrum Awan, was the perennial ploy of the Jews and their monopoly media cartel to fling the accusation “anti-Semitic” at anyone who so much as brushes up against their holy of holiest shrines, the state of Israel and its atheistic Zionist ideology. Anything that could possibly relate to that issue, no matter how tangential in nature, should it be deemed critical in any way of the assumed supremacist and racist nature of the Jews-only state, automatically ensures that the author of said critique will be subjected to this self-chosen epithet in order to demean and vilify the writer or speaker and thus render him or her persona non grata in the eyes of the general public and unworthy of further respect or attention.
This method of dealing with Zion’s critics has a long and infamous history; one that for the most part has worked extremely well over the past century and longer to silence and discredit opponents of the Jewish conspiracy for global hegemony. This is why the ruling in Awan/Levant libel case has suddenly and so succinctly delineated the possibility that such success may be on the wain, a very real, shocking and threatening thought for those who have been so adept at flashing that card and automatically expecting to trump any argument presented by the non-Jewish or gentile critic no matter how legitimate, logical or truthful.
This same reaction to Justice Matheson’s ruling could easily be compared with the former controversial sec. 13 Canadian Human Rights Code legislation that was the subject of heated debate for many years until it was finally repealed by the Harper government in 2012 when his handlers (the Jewish lobbyists) realized that such a specious law was in fact a double-edged sword that could be, and was being used against not only the gentile population of critics of Zion but also the Jews themselves.
That said, in the case of myself, another longstanding victim of Levant’s similar bellicose and libellous accusations of being “anti-Semitic”, the ruling came more as a pleasant surprise and along with that sense of satisfaction the hope for a possible turnaround of a decades-long systemic pattern of legal misfeasance on the part of Canada’s judiciary when it comes to finding anyone of Zionist Jew persuasion guilty of a crime (other than that of child porn which is fairly common).
The reaction by the Zionist media was expected and throughout their news networks and affiliated blogs the feigned cries of outrage were heard resounding across the msm and over the internet. Why this should come as such a shock to Canadians merely illustrates the power of the Zionist press and its tv media to instil their version of “political reality” into the minds of unwary readers and viewers.
Why decent, thoughtful people should be overly upset by the fact that Levant was found guilty of defamation is, in itself, disconcerting given his years of promoting the Zionist agenda of spreading lies and hatred about the Muslim people at the behest of his Zionist controllers who continually feed his fragmented ego and fill his purse with scheckles; an agenda designed to build up a much greater and lethal game plan of inciting the whole of Western nations into a frenzied, unfounded and pathologic hatred of Muslim nations as the pretext for endless, imperialist wars against the people of the Middle East.
For those who haven’t figured out what Zionism is yet (other than the Zionist’s version), coming to terms with Judge Matheson’s decision will be difficult to understand and accept and it’s only through a greater understanding of who Ezra Levant really is that one can begin to fathom the depth of deception that the Canadian public has been subjected to over the past seventy years of media and judicial transgression that has left our nation bereft of any reliable and truthful reference point from which to reasonably and intellectually access what’s going on in our world of politics and law.
I’ve been following Levant’s meteoric rise to fame and misfortune ever since 2007 when I became embroiled in the sec. 13 drama after B’nai Brith Canada (a Jews-only secret masonic organization) filed a complaint against myself and my website in November of 2007 with the Canadian Human Rights Commission seeking relief for discriminatory publication under prohibited grounds caught by Section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act claiming that, to wit: “The premise of this complaint is a contention that Arthur Topham of Quesnel, British Columbia, Canada and his internet publication known as Radicalpress.com contrive to promote ongoing hatred affecting persons identifiable as Jews and/or as citizens of Israel.”
It would be advisable for readers to take special note of the last three words in that complaint as they illustrate in no uncertain terms what the Jewish lobby here in Canada wants to establish as law – NO CRITICISM OF ISRAEL! Their same modus operandi is now in play in my current Sec. 319(2) criminal charge of promoting “Hate Propaganda” toward “people of the Jewish religion or ethnic origin“.
There is so much more to be said about Ezra Levant and the reasons why he’s been elevated to the status that he now holds in Canada’s media and how it ties in with the Harper government, the racist state of Israel and the global pursuits of Zionist juggernaut that wants control of everything from our personal data to the final say in every law and decision ranging from the local to highest branches of international governance on the planet.
I will leave readers with a list of my own critiques of this Zionist stooge who the msm has employed for years to voice the agenda of Israel under the guise of freedom of speech in Canada. Maybe after reading further those still in awe of this Zionist double agent for Israel will come to see him for what he truly is, a traitor to Canada just like his co-conspirator Stephen Harper.
Further articles on Ezra Levant by Arthur Topham:
Editor’s Note: While the West, now under “full spectrum dominance” by the Jewish banking cartel, expends vital time and energy in a vain attempt to malign and vilify Russian Federation president Vladimir Putin and while our own Jew puppet Canadian PM Stephen Harper beaks off in the most bellicose, belligerent manner against Putin whenever given the opportunity, they’re all being taken for the fools that they truly are as Dmitry Kalinichenko points out in this most interesting of articles concerning global economics, gold and the battle to break free from the stranglehold of the Rothschild crime syndicate that’s been ruling the world for the past 250 years.
Do pass this along to your friends and associates.
The Radical Press
Canada’s Radical News Network
“Digging to the root of the issues since 1998″
Accusations of the West towards Putin traditionally are based on the fact that he worked in the KGB. And therefore he is a cruel and immoral person. Putin is blamed for everything. But nobody ever accused Putin of lack of intelligence.
Any accusations against this man only emphasize his ability for quick analytical thinking and making clear and balanced political and economic decisions.
Often Western media compares this ability with the ability of a grandmaster, conducting a public chess simul. Recent developments in US economy and the West in general allow us to conclude that in this part of the assessment of Putin’s personality Western media is absolutely right.
Despite numerous success reports in the style of Fox News and CNN, today, Western economy, led by the United States is in Putin’s trap, the way out of which no one in the West can see or find. And the more the West is trying to escape from this trap, the more stuck it becomes.
What is the truly tragic predicament of the West and the United States, in which they find themselves? And why all the Western media and leading Western economists are silent about this, as a well guarded military secret? Let’s try to understand the essence of current economic events, in the context of the economy, setting aside the factors of morality, ethics and geopolitics.
After realizing its failure in Ukraine, the West, led by the US set out to destroy Russian economy by lowering oil prices, and accordingly gas prices as the main budget sources of export revenue in Russia and the main sources of replenishment of Russian gold reserves.
It should be noted that the main failure of the West in Ukraine is not military or political. But in the actual refusal of Putin to fund the Western project of Ukraine at the expense of the budget of Russian Federation. What makes this Western project not viable in the near and inevitable future.
Last time under president Reagan, such actions of the West’s lowering of oil prices led to ‘success’ and the collapse of USSR. But history does not repeat itself all the time. This time things are different for the West. Putin’s response to the West resembles both chess and judo, when the strength used by the enemy is used against him, but with minimal costs to the strength and resources of the defender. Putin’s real policies are not public. Therefore, Putin’s policy largely has always focused not so much on effect, but on efficiency.
Very few people understand what Putin is doing at the moment. And almost no one understands what he will do in the future.
No matter how strange it may seem, but right now, Putin is selling Russian oil and gas only for physical gold.
Putin is not shouting about it all over the world. And of course, he still accepts US dollars as an intermediate means of payment. But he immediately exchanges all these dollars obtained from the sale of oil and gas for physical gold!
To understand this, it is enough to look at the dynamics of growth of gold reserves of Russia and to compare this data with foreign exchange earnings of the RF coming from the sale of oil and gas over the same period.
Moreover, in the third quarter the purchases by Russia of physical gold are at an all-time high, record levels. In the third quarter of this year, Russia had purchased an incredible amount of gold in the amount of 55 tons. It’s more than all the central banks of all countries of the world combined (according to official data)!
In total, the central banks of all countries of the world have purchased 93 tons of the precious metal in the third quarter of 2014. It was the 15th consecutive quarter of net purchases of gold by Central banks. Of the 93 tonnes of gold purchases by central banks around the world during this period, the staggering volume of purchases – of 55 tons – belongs to Russia.
Not so long ago, British scientists have successfully come to the same conclusion, as was published in the Conclusion of the U.S. Geological survey a few years ago. Namely: Europe will not be able to survive without energy supply from Russia. Translated from English to any other language in the world it means: “The world will not be able to survive if oil and gas from Russia is subtracted from the global balance of energy supply”.
Thus, the Western world, built on the hegemony of the petrodollar, is in a catastrophic situation. In which it cannot survive without oil and gas supplies from Russia. And Russia is now ready to sell its oil and gas to the West only in exchange for physical gold! The twist of Putin’s game is that the mechanism for the sale of Russian energy to the West only for gold now works regardless of whether the West agrees to pay for Russian oil and gas with its artificially cheap gold, or not.
Because Russia, having a regular flow of dollars from the sale of oil and gas, in any case, will be able to convert them to gold with current gold prices, depressed by all means by the West. That is, at the price of gold, which had been artificially and meticulously lowered by the Fed and ESF many times, against artificially inflated purchasing power of the dollar through market manipulation.
Interesting fact: the suppression of gold prices by the special department of US Government – ESF (Exchange Stabilization Fund) – with the aim of stabilizing the dollar has been made into a law in the United States.
In the financial world it is accepted as a given that gold is an antidollar.
- In 1971, US President Richard Nixon closed the ‘gold window’, ending the free exchange of dollars for gold, guaranteed by the US in 1944 at Bretton Woods.
- In 2014, Russian President Vladimir Putin has reopened the ‘gold window’, without asking Washington’s permission.
Right now the West spends much of its efforts and resources to suppress the prices of gold and oil. Thereby, on the one hand to distort the existing economic reality in favor of the US dollar and on the other hand, to destroy the Russian economy, refusing to play the role of obedient vassal of the West.
Today assets such as gold and oil look proportionally weakened and excessively undervalued against the US dollar. It is a consequence of the enormous economic effort on the part of the West.
And now Putin sells Russian energy resources in exchange for these US dollars, artificially propped by the efforts of the West. With which he immediately buys gold, artificially devalued against the U.S. dollar by the efforts of the West itself!
There is another interesting element in Putin’s game. It’s Russian uranium. Every sixth light bulb in the USA depends on its supply. Which Russia sells to the US too, for dollars.
Thus, in exchange for Russian oil, gas and uranium, the West pays Russia with dollars, purchasing power of which is artificially inflated against oil and gold by the efforts of the West. But Putin uses these dollars only to withdraw physical gold from the West in exchange, for the price denominated in US dollars, artificially lowered by the same West.
This truly brilliant economic combination by Putin puts the West led by the United States in a position of a snake, aggressively and diligently devouring its own tail.
The idea of this economic golden trap for the West, probably originated not from Putin himself. Most likely it was the idea of Putin’s Advisor for Economic Affairs – doctor Sergey Glazyev. Otherwise why seemingly not involved in business bureaucrat Glazyev, along with many Russian businessmen, was personally included by Washington on the sanction list? The idea of an economist, doctor Glazyev was brilliantly executed by Putin, with full endorsement from his Chinese colleague – XI Jinping.
Especially interesting in this context looks the November statement of the first Deputy Chairman of Central Bank of Russia Ksenia Yudaeva, which stressed that the CBR can use the gold from its reserves to pay for imports, if need be. It is obvious that in terms of sanctions by the Western world, this statement is addressed to the BRICS countries, and first of all China. For China, Russia’s willingness to pay for goods with Western gold is very convenient. And here’s why:
“China recently announced that it will cease to increase its gold and currency reserves denominated in US dollars. Considering the growing trade deficit between the US and China (the current difference is five times in favor of China), then this statement translated from the financial language reads: “China stops selling their goods for dollars”. The world’s media chose not to notice this grandest in the recent monetary history event . The issue is not that China literally refuses to sell its goods for US dollars. China, of course, will continue to accept US dollars as an intermediate means of payment for its goods. But, having taken dollars, China will immediately get rid of them and replace with something else in the structure of its gold and currency reserves. Otherwise the statement made by the monetary authorities of China loses its meaning: “We are stopping the increase of our gold and currency reserves, denominated in US dollars.” That is, China will no longer buy United States Treasury bonds for dollars earned from trade with any countries, as they did this before.”
Thus, China will replace all the dollars that it will receive for its goods not only from the US but from all over the world with something else not to increase their gold currency reserves, denominated in US dollars. And here is an interesting question: what will China replace all the trade dollars with? What currency or an asset? Analysis of the current monetary policy of China shows that most likely the dollars coming from trade, or a substantial chunk of them, China will quietly replace and de facto is already replacing with Gold.
In this aspect, the solitaire of Russian-Chinese relations is extremely successful for Moscow and Beijing. Russia buys goods from China directly for gold at its current price. While China buys Russian energy resources for gold at its current price. At this Russian-Chinese festival of life there is a place for everything: Chinese goods, Russian energy resources, and gold – as a means of mutual payment. Only US dollar has no place at this festival of life. And this is not surprising. Because the US dollar is not a Chinese product, nor a Russian energy resource. It is only an intermediate financial instrument of settlement – and an unnecessary intermediary. And it is customary to exclude unnecessary intermediaries from the interaction of two independent business partners.
It should be noted separately that the global market for physical gold is extremely small relative to the world market for physical oil supplies. And especially the world market for physical gold is microscopic compared to the entirety of world markets for physical delivery of oil, gas, uranium and goods.
Emphasis on the phrase “physical gold” is made because in exchange for its physical, not ‘paper’ energy resources, Russia is now withdrawing gold from the West, but only in its physical, not paper form. So does China, by acquiring from the West the artificially devalued physical gold as a payment for physical delivery of real products to the West.
The West’s hopes that Russia and China will accept as payment for their energy resources and goods “shitcoin” or so-called “paper gold” of various kinds also did not materialize. Russia and China are only interested in gold and only physical metal as a final means of payment.
For reference: the turnover of the market of paper gold, only of gold futures, is estimated at $360 billion per month. But physical delivery of gold is only for $280 million a month. Which makes the ratio of trade of paper gold versus physical gold: 1000 to 1.
Using the mechanism of active withdrawal from the market of one artificially lowered by the West financial asset (gold) in exchange for another artificially inflated by the West financial asset (USD), Putin has thereby started the countdown to the end of the world hegemony of petrodollar. Thus, Putin has put the West in a deadlock of the absence of any positive economic prospects.
The West can spend as much of its efforts and resources to artificially increase the purchasing power of the dollar, lower oil prices and artificially lower the purchasing power of gold. The problem of the West is that the stocks of physical gold in possession of the West are not unlimited. Therefore, the more the West devalues oil and gold against the US dollar, the faster it loses devaluing Gold from its not infinite reserves.
In this brilliantly played by Putin economic combination the physical gold is rapidly flowing to Russia, China, Brazil, Kazakhstan and India, the BRICS countries, from the reserves of the West. At the current rate of reduction of reserves of physical gold, the West simply does not have the time to do anything against Putin’s Russia until the collapse of the entire Western petrodollar world. In chess the situation in which Putin has put the West, led by the US, is called “time trouble”.
The Western world has never faced such economic events and phenomena that are happening right now. USSR rapidly sold gold during the fall of oil prices. Russia rapidly buys gold during the fall in oil prices. Thus, Russia poses a real threat to the American model of petrodollar world domination.
The main principle of world petrodollar model is allowing Western countries led by the United States to live at the expense of the labor and resources of other countries and peoples based on the role of the US currency, dominant in the global monetary system (GMS) . The role of the US dollar in the GMS is that it is the ultimate means of payment. This means that the national currency of the United States in the structure of the GMS is the ultimate asset accumulator, to exchange which to any other asset does not make sense.
What the BRICS countries, led by Russia and China, are doing now is actually changing the role and status of the US dollar in the global monetary system. From the ultimate means of payment and asset accumulation, the national currency of the USA, by the joint actions of Moscow and Beijing is turned into only an intermediate means of payment. Intended only to exchange this interim payment for another and the ulimate financial asset – gold. Thus, the US dollar actually loses its role as the ultimate means of payment and asset accumulation, yielding both of those roles to another recognized, denationalized and depoliticized monetary asset – gold.
Traditionally, the West has used two methods to eliminate the threat to the hegemony of petrodollar model in the world and the consequent excessive privileges for the West.
One of these methods – colored revolutions. The second method, which is usually applied by the West, if the first fails – military aggression and bombing.
But in Russia’s case both of these methods are either impossible or unacceptable for the West.
Because, firstly, the population of Russia, unlike people in many other countries, does not wish to exchange their freedom and the future of their children for Western kielbasa. This is evident from the record ratings of Putin, regularly published by the leading Western rating agencies. Personal friendship of Washington protégé Navalny with Senator McCain played for him and Washington a very negative role. Having learned this fact from the media, 98% of the Russian population now perceive Navalny only as a vassal of Washington and a traitor of Russia’s national interests. Therefore Western professionals, who have not yet lost their mind, cannot dream about any color revolution in Russia.
As for the second traditional Western way of direct military aggression, Russia is certainly not Yugoslavia, not Iraq or Libya. In any non-nuclear military operation against Russia, on the territory of Russia, the West led by the US is doomed to defeat. And the generals in the Pentagon exercising real leadership of NATO forces are aware of this. Similarly hopeless is a nuclear war against Russia, including the concept of so-called “preventive disarming nuclear strike”. NATO is simply not technically able to strike a blow that would completely disarm the nuclear potential of Russia in all its many manifestations. A massive nuclear retaliatory strike on the enemy or a pool of enemies would be inevitable. And its total capacity will be enough for survivors to envy the dead. That is, an exchange of nuclear strikes with a country like Russia is not a solution to the looming problem of the collapse of a petrodollar world. It is in the best case, a final chord and the last point in the history of its existence. In the worst case – a nuclear winter and the demise of all life on the planet, except for the bacteria mutated from radiation.
The Western economic establishment can see and understand the essence of the situation. Leading Western economists are certainly aware of the severity of the predicament and hopelessness of the situation the Western world finds itself in, in Putin’s economic gold trap. After all, since the Bretton Woods agreements, we all know the Golden rule: “Who has more gold sets the rules.” But everyone in the West is silent about it. Silent because no one knows now how to get out of this situation.
If you explain to the Western public all the details of the looming economic disaster, the public will ask the supporters of a petrodollar world the most terrible questions, which will sound like this:
- How long will the West be able to buy oil and gas from Russia in exchange for physical gold?
And what will happen to the US petrodollar after the West runs out of physical gold to pay for Russian oil, gas and uranium, as well as to pay for Chinese goods?
No one in the west today can answer these seemingly simple questions.
And this is called “Checkmate”, ladies and gentlemen. The game is over.
Kinder Morgan: The Rest of the Story the Tyee left out
Kinder Morgan. Economist Robyn Allan in TYEE. Corporate Robbers in British Columbia. The National Energy Board …. A part of the story Robyn Allan doesn’t tell.
The story is so large, so corrupt, so – to many, many ordinary Canadian eyes – so criminal – Robyn Allan couldn’t possibly have told all of the Terasen/BC Transmountain Pipeline System story. More has to be laid out. British Columbians must know, first, that the National Energy Board is their enemy – and they must treat it – openly – as that. (Other enemies are more obvious.)
In his 2014 book PARTY OF ONE, about Stephen Harper, Michael Harris writes (p. 153) that in a policy paper “generated by bureaucrats in Harper’s International Trade Ministry” the National Energy Board (NEB) is described as “an ‘ally’ of the Harper government’s resource development plans.”
Anyone who has had doubts, at all, will see in what follows that Stephen Harper is a major enemy – probably enemy Number One. And he has made the National Energy Board his lackey. Need we say more?
For Robyn Allan’s article, readers need to go to TheTyee.ca 17 November, 2014.
In the article – in brief – she makes clear the intimate ENRON connections of Richard Kinder. (ENRON, for those who have forgotten, is the gigantic U.S. Energy corporation built on accounting fraud to revenues of around $111 billion in 2001 before it exploded and bankrupted in a corruption scandal lasting years and costing honest, trusting people $ billions.) She makes clear, as well, Richard Kinder’s brilliance as a tax juggler (and evader), and his brilliance in slipping the former Canadian corporation based in Vancouver, Terasen, and its holding – the Trans-Mountain Pipeline System – into wholly U.S. hands and almost as wholly into a life under U.S. law.
What almost NOBODY mentions now is that a few short years ago, the pipeline causing the present Burnaby Mountain actions – and the corporation to which it was attached – made up A WHOLLY, PEOPLE-OWNED, BRITISH COLUMBIA OPERATION feeding revenue into support for education, healthcare, etc.
Let’s put it simply. A plan was put into effect – beginning about fifteen years ago – to rob British Columbians of their public corporations (and the wealth they generated), and to hand all to U.S. private corporations. The plan was also to impoverish British Columbians and to teach them to live in poverty. Terasen’s demise was only a part.
The major activity of the sell-out happened under Gordon Campbell’s Right-leaning Liberal government when Christie Clark was Deputy Premier and (later) judged to be a violator of Canada’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms as Minister of Education. That attack on Public Education was a part of the movement to “the privatization of everything”, including the education of B.C.’s children – a still on-going, as yet uncompleted program.
For those saying the RCMP officers on Burnaby Mountain arresting demonstrators are very nice fellows who are just doing a job that our splendid Rule Of Law in Canada forces upon them – it’s time to re-think!
It is a fact (read Ian Mulgrew, Vancouver Sun, Nov. 24 and Nov.27) that the injunction gained by Kinder Morgan against the demonstrators is a highly dubious legal tactic rejected by a number of judges and ex-judges. As well … the RCMP in British Columbia has a growing reputation as – to put the matter plainly – a corrupt organization. Never mind the unexamined (but much rumoured) RCMP role in the Pickton Farm Missing Women story. Stay with “politics”.
Many believe premier Glen Clark (the late 1990s) was set up, vilified, falsely investigated, and politically ruined by a mafia group made up of the Gordon Campbell interests (political and corporate), the Mainstream Press and Media, and the RCMP … with the unfortunate assistance of certain forces in the higher courts of British Columbia. (More on that aspect later.)
I didn’t like the smell of the RCMP investigation of Glen Clark. I wrote to the Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP asking for a review of the investigation (which was rumoured to be improper). The Commission (in my experience) appears to be a front organization employed to prevent serious investigation and action. The review I asked for began. I received non-informative monthly notes. Then it was stopped by two Vancouver RCMP officers who informed me that 28 volumes of evidentiary material on Glen Clark had been put at the disposal of prosecutors. (Remember: when he was successfully ruined, the judge on the case declared Glen Clark innocent of all charges against him.)
I asked for the review to continue – to find if the RCMP had investigated Glen Clark improperly. I received no answer. I waited. And I waited. And I waited. Almost THREE YEARS LATER I received a report by the Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP on the investigation of Glen Clark by the RCMP in British Columbia. The Report was short. It informed me that the two officers of the RCMP had IMPROPERLY closed the review I asked for.
Then the Report advised me that The Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP had decided to leave it up to the “discretion” of the B.C. RCMP whether it would open up the review I had asked for and continue it! Readers will have to guess what the Vancouver RCMP decided ….
In almost every dirty, large, BC political activity thereafter, I believe the RCMP has come out with dirty hands.
The move to “the privatization of everything” has involved education, transportation, energy, infrastructure, medicare … and more.
The bastard privatization of BC Ferries began early in the 2000s and has been a disaster. Readers of the legislation creating the “privatized” entity can see its sham nature. Not only was the move a way to get “fake” revenue for government, but it was a privatization that wasn’t privatization. The expensive Ferry Commissioner structure is, in my judgement, a useless, paper creation. The BC government still calls the shots – and places its cronies onto the unnecessary and useless Board of Directors – paying them well. At the same time the “privatized” corporation pays its top administrators hockey-star salaries as the organization they run sinks deeper and deeper into the slime of privatization.
Ordinary British Columbians and the economy of the coastal communities are being savaged. But who cares, for privatization is continuing.
THE BIG BC PRIVATIZATION which is, strangely, hardly talked about is the privatization of what was BC GAS. That was the publicly-owned corporation operating the transmountain pipeline which is being fought over on Burnaby Mountain… and more. BC GAS, I have been told, twinned with BC Hydro. The two worked together, making modernizations possible and good budgeting, balanced books, and contributions to B.C. General Revenues in support of education, health care, and other public needs.
The huge pressure for ‘privatization’ came (globally) as the fight-back of the corporations intensified, greedy for the money that was – after the Second World War – going into social needs and the decent living of the population. That was when private corporations began bribing, coercing, threatening, undermining, mating with, and otherwise taking over governments.
And so it was under a New Democratic government in B.C. that BC GAS was permitted to “go private”. The politics of that needs research! But the NDP was “going right” with the tide, was beginning its more than decade-long sell-out, its acceptance of privatization policies, of “Free Trade” Agreements, of the falsehood that lower taxes on private corporations spur employment … and more.
The NDP, however, demanded that the privatized BC GAS, now called TERASEN be headquartered in British Columbia and remain in Canadian hands. As soon as Gordon Campbell took power (after the rigged destruction of Glen Clark and the BC NDP) work was started on selling Terasen to U.S. interests. At the same time, David Hahn, Gordon Campbell’s personal pick for head of the bastard privatization of BC Ferries, spent his first three years or so travelling the globe in an attempt to dump BC Ferries onto anyone in the world who would buy it. But potential buyers were all too smart….
And so BC Ferries became, as I see it, a private club for Gordon Campbell government and friends and associates … to play with (creating cruise-style monsters) and to squeeze for any cash that could come out of it.
Public concern wouldn’t let BC Hydro go the same way. And so it is being wrecked more carefully. Divided now into three parts, one part was handed to a portion of the Scandal Prince called ENRON, a portion that managed to slip away and rename. And so Accenture – a private corporation – has the management of a third of BC Hydro. A new entity has been formed to manage the distribution of power created by BC Hydro – and it, apparently, is overseen by a major U.S. private, continental energy manager.
The privatized run-of- the-river creations (of the Gordon Campbell/Christie Clark governments) are – to my mind – such a scandal of corrupt contracts and environmental disasters they need a Royal Commission Inquiry with the full right granted to the Commission to recommend criminal charges wherever deemed warranted. Whatever development of the energy resources of British Columbia rivers was to be undertaken, it should have been careful, long-term planned, and minutely managed in the public interest and by public ownership under the BC Hydro banner. Privatization of BC’s waterways has been a financial, engineering, and environmental disaster of gigantic proportions.
BC Ferries, BC Gas, BC Hydro … and BC Rail! Having privatized (profitable) CN Rail and seeing it become a U.S. private corporation headquartered in Texas, privatizer Paul Tellier (an avid and public Continentalist wanting a single currency for North America … and more) came to visit B.C. at the turn of the century. While here, he advocated that (profitable) BC Rail do what CN Rail had done. Gordon Campbell was eager.
It is my contention that the whole ‘privatization’ of BC Rail was corrupt, perhaps criminal. I asked the BC RCMP to begin investigation and it refused. I believe that private corporate interests, ‘inside’ government agencies, and cabinet powers set about to destroy any profitable operation of BC Rail, to undermine it in the public’s eyes, to ready it to hand away … and then, corruptly, to place it in the hands of the Texas people who owned CN Rail.
In order to do that, many, many, many people had to be part of the activity. Three lower-order functionaries – Sikhs incidentally – were charged in a strange and almost accidental set of circumstances. The charges were ballyhoo’d to be the result of a determination to get to the bottom of corruption in the BC Rail Scandal. The three men were, rather, in my mind, used as part of a gigantic cover-up to protect the real criminals in the privatization and giveaway of BC Rail.
Following and reporting on the four years of court action against the men, I came to believe, without doubt, that they were used to cover-up for the real criminals.
And it is here we have to bring in Stephen Harper. His cabinet in Ottawa did two key things. When the judge on the Basi, Virk, and Basi trial was being responsive to the needs of the Defence lawyers, repeatedly ordering evidence be provided to them that would assure a fair defence, she was removed by an action taken by the minister of justice in the Harper cabinet. The judge who replaced Madam Justice Elizabeth Bennett was, in my judgement, “a patsy”. Shortly after being placed on the case, she was raised to the position of Associate Chief Justice of the B.C. Supreme Court … and a little later to the Appeals Court of B.C. – all actions of the federal minister of justice acting, we may be sure, in close consultation with Stephen Harper, prime minister.
The switch of judges on the Basi, Virk, and Basi case was managed by Patrick Dohm, then associate chief justice of the B.C. Supreme court. He was the judge who (earlier) signed the search warrant to surprise search (with TV crew accompaniment) the home of premier Glen Clark where no incriminating evidence could be found. Dohm was the judge who later signed the more than twenty search warrants that accompanied the famous (BC Rail related) search warrant “raid” on B.C. legislature offices. He insisted that only one of the homes searched must be forewarned by the police. That just happened to be the home of Christie Clark.
The “raiding” RCMP officers discovered at the address of a lobbyist for a Railway interest certain confidential cabinet documents. He was never charged, nor was he (as far as anyone knows) further investigated. By the merest coincidence he turned out to be Christie Clark’s brother. The investigating RCMP never sought a search warrant for the address of premier Gordon Campbell – an obvious target, and they had a precedent in the search warrant obtained to search the home of then premier Glen Clark. Gordon Campbell’s home, in the minds of many, was much more likely to harbour incriminating evidence than Glen Clark’s home was – perhaps the reason the RCMP avoided Gordon Campbell’s residence.
When the trial was terminated (it wasn’t over), Gordon Campbell had sunk to an historic low in ratings by the population. He might be said to be despised as the story of his privatizations became widely known. What would become of him if he remained (now no longer premier) in British Columbia?
Stephen Harper solved that problem, naming Gordon Campbell to one of the top positions among diplomats of Canada – naming him Canada’s High Commissioner in London, England, where he is living out his life humbly, in the devoted service of the Canadian people. I believe there is evidence in the whole story to suggest that Gordon Campbell and Stephen Harper worked (and work) for the same global private corporate forces which intend to privatize everything and to turn Canadians into paupers and beggars in the process.
To close (though there are pages more that might be said), a brief look at the courts and the RCMP…. I said earlier the RCMP refused to investigate the central actors in the BC Rail Scandal. And throughout the legal proceedings in court the Defence lawyers repeatedly suggested the RCMP was not fully and fairly cooperating and was delaying submission of evidentiary material. My own observation was that the RCMP spent endless time on the three lower-level operatives who were charged and no time on anyone else under suspicion.
I revealed that the Special Crown Prosecutor (who had to work closely, after his appointment in 2003, with the RCMP) had been appointed in flagrant violation of the legislation governing the appointment of Special Prosecutors. And so the investigation – since he was appointed – and the conduct of ALL the court proceedings were in doubt as to their legitimacy. He was, clearly, not legitimate as Special Crown Prosecutor, having been a close associate of both the Attorney General who appointed him and of the Deputy Attorney General.
He was illegitimately in the courtroom as Special Prosecutor. But he had also been working in close relation to the investigative forces of the RCMP from 2003 until the pre-trial began in 2007 … and even after, as an illegitimate appointment. What did that mean about the investigation by the RCMP?
Those matters got worse when I reported to the Chief Justice, the Associate Chief Justice and to the judge on the trial that the Special Crown Prosecutor was illegitimately in the court. I gave them the evidence – which was simple enough. The clearly stated legislation describing the requirements of a Special Crown Prosecutor had been wildly violated, visibly, and incontrovertibly.
The officer of the court who replied to the information I had sent to each of the judges reported to me that since none of the three judges had participated in the appointment of the Special Crown Prosecutor they would do nothing. The fact that the highest court in British Columbia, the Supreme Court, was being used by an illegitimate Crown Prosecutor – and that the Chief Justice and the Associate Chief Justice were responsible for the administration of justice in that court – didn’t interest them. And so I wrote to them again. And they would do nothing, again.
And then, (as I read the situation) to conclude, in order to prevent the trial of the three accused men from revealing information about the major criminals in the BC Rail Scandal, the trial had to be shut down to prevent further cross-examination of witnesses. Street language might say that the accused were bribed into letting the trial end. Six million dollars was paid by government (by B.C. taxpayers, that is) to cover all the costs of the accused. And the charges against them were cleaned of anything important. The trial stopped … without ending.
Who initialed the six million dollars to be paid? No one could find out. And the RCMP, of course, didn’t investigate. The Auditor General of British Columbia tried and tried and tried to find out who authorized the payments – and couldn’t find out. The premier, Christie Clark , and her Attorney General, Shirley Bond, somehow prevented the Auditor General from ever finding out – though he even went to court to force release of the information.
At the beginning of this column I said that the information about Burnaby Mountain, about the Trans Mountain Pipeline System, about the RCMP on Burnaby Mountain arresting demonstrators, about the dubious injunction against the demonstrators, and about the history of Richard Kinder supplied by Robyn Allan doesn’t tell the whole story.
The whole story needs to be told of the determination of the Harper federal cabinet and the Gordon Campbell/Christie Clark cabinet (as an unholy alliance) to privatize everything, to give it to U.S. interests, and to pauperize and make beggars of the British Columbia population … and in the process to pollute and destroy the environment in which British Columbians live. The whole story needs to be told of how BC GAS was first turned into Terasen (for no worthwhile reason), and was then dumped by the Gordon Campbell government into the lap of Richard Kinder and friends.
If that hadn’t happened (and it shouldn’t have happened) there would be no battle on Burnaby mountain now. The story of Richard Kinder is interesting … and horrible. But the sell-out of British Columbia’s publicly-owned wealth by the Gordon Campbell/Christie Clark team is more interesting to B.C. people – and more horrible.
When that story is known, then the ease with which the Kinder Morgan forces have moved into B.C. and are dictating to the B.C. government, to the Harper government, and to its lackey organization called the National Energy Board becomes as clear as it needs to be.
Robin Mathews can be reached at: Robin Mathews firstname.lastname@example.org