Justin Trudeau’s “Chopper of Rights” by Kari Simpson

justintrudeauchop

screen-shot-2016-12-06-at-10-47-45-pm

Justin Trudeau’s “Chopper of Rights”

December 3, 2016 

By Kari Simpson

karisimpson-250

Justin Trudeau’s willingness to bend over and acquiesce to the demands of sex activists has reached a new low.

According to sex activist and lawyer Douglas Elliott’s Statement of Claim, Green Zombies in rainbow tutus participating in a Pride parade are more than scary! Not only was Elliott himself as a Toronto parade marcher affected, but our Prime Minister, the Attorney General of Canada, and the tens of thousands of people who attended or participated in the Toronto Pride Parade apparently suffered extreme “harm,” “trauma” or “mental distress”—whether they know it or not. This is because Bill Whatcott and a few Christian Truth activists, who paid their entry fees under the name of the “Gay Zombies Cannabis Consumers Association” and dressed up as neon green zombies with rainbow tutus, handed out flyers wrapped to look like condoms. For this they are being sued for $104 million dollars.

Screen Shot 2016-08-13 at 11.16.36 PM

It is true that the flyer handed out to the happy crowd contained a bold and graphic political message about the health risks associated with the practice of sodomy, and noted the Liberal Party of Canada’s determined path to put children at risk.

There’s no doubt that the facts in the flyer damaged the propagandist machine of the sex activists. Truth will do that, and this threatens the ability of sex activist organizations to continue to milk the government coffers dry and bamboozle trusting Canadians.

The reality in Canada is that Men having Sex with Men (“MSM”) is costing tax-payers billions of dollars a year. This is a direct result of their indulgence in socially irresponsible behaviours, and then demanding your tax dollars to sustain themselves and hundreds of so-called “non-profit” organizations and “trusts” that cater to their needs, appetites, lawsuits, health costs and political lobbying.

Like most Canadians, I don’t want the government dictating what is permissible in the bedrooms of the nation. BUT when those bedrooms continually grab at my wallet, and that behaviour puts children and minors at risk, and those activities increasingly are being engaged in public spaces, that changes this political game.

Socially irresponsible and unnatural sexual practices like sodomy are creating a public health crisis and infecting and killing young men by the thousands every year. Canadians have a right to be informed. According to Public Health Agency of Canada: One-quarter of all HIV diagnoses in Canada were in youth aged 15 to 29.

According to national surveillance data collected between 1985 and 2014:

  • 20,235 youth (aged 15 to 29) have been diagnosed with HIV in Canada.
  • Just over one-quarter (26%) of all HIV diagnoses (of people whose age was known) were youth aged 15 to 29 years.
  • Three-quarters (75%) of all HIV diagnoses among youth were male.

Those statistics relate just to “youth.” According to the agency, the total number of people living with HIV (including those with AIDS) in Canada is estimated to be, as of 2014, approximately 75,500 (range between 63,400 and 87,600). This estimate represents a 9.7% increase from the estimated 68,800 (range between 57,600 and 80,000) at the end of 2011.

Syphilis is on the rise, along with Gonorrhoea and Chlamydia. Rates of Syphilis infections between 2003 and 2012 have increased 100% with the majority of infections occurring from MSM. Don’t forget about Anal Warts, Hepatitis C, Anal Cancer, and Genital Herpes. Oh, and did you know the sex activists community is lobbying right now for you to pay for a drug regimen that can be used by men who engage in “risky” sex with virus positive guys or high risk partners to help reduce the odds of them contracting the virus – a mere $1000 or so per course of treatment!

Do you know that it is conservatively estimated that medical costs and loss of contribution to society costs taxpayers $1.4 million per episode, per person infected with HIV/AIDS? That is just the medical costs, BUT there is an industry that has boomed as a result: the taxpayer funded, friends of the government, squawk-boxing, non-profit organizations like AIDS Committee Toronto (“ACT”) that hold “Condom Stuffing Parties” with pizza provided(!) and you pay for it!   According to Revenue Canada reporting period March 31, 2016, a hefty $2,676,577 of government funding (your money) was given to ACT. The Health Initiative for Men (HIM), another sex activist organization, received $500,000 from the BC government to create a hard-core gay porn video that was linked as a “Youth Resource” to one of the programs being used to combat “bullying” in schools. (You get the idea, more on this another time. Back to Whatcott…)

Lawyer Douglas Elliott and his “legal team” at Cambridge Law LLP, including lawyers Chris Macloud, Doug Fairley, Manjit Singh and Joan Kasozi are all busy sex activists. In addition to suing Mr. Whatcott for $104 million, Mr. Elliott is acting “Chair” and identified as one of the “authors” of the Just Society Report.   This 200+ page “Report” is the catalyst for the renewed efforts by sex activists to lower the age of consent for sodomy—an amendment to the Criminal Code that the Prime Minister has agreed to act upon.

The so-called “charitable organization” responsible for the Just Society Report is called the EGALE Human Rights Trust. This organization has received $887,075 of taxpayers’ money—your money. “Legal team Cambridge” members Fairley, Singh and Kasozi are also “acknowledged” as helping create the “Report,” along with Dr. Rev. Brent Hawkes, who is currently being tried criminally in Nova Scotia for engaging in sexual acts with teenage boys.

The “Report” isn’t limited to endangering minors. It also demands that amends be made and compensation paid to homosexuals who, in generations past, compromised the security of Canada by being vulnerable to blackmail and other tactics of coercion, and were for that reason removed from military service.

In addition to the demands made in the “Report” chaired and authored in part by Douglas Elliott, Mr. Elliott—now putting on his lawyer-hat—has also launched yet another class-action lawsuit, this time against the government—that is, against you and me.

According to Elliott’s law firm’s write-up about the case, the homosexual plaintiffs are seeking—quote—“General and Aggravated Damages claimed on behalf of the class in the sum of $500,000,000”—that’s half a billion dollars!—plus “exemplary damages are claimed in the amount of $100,000,000.” That’s a total of $600 million in a case referred to as “the Ross matter.” In a CBC interview, Elliott used this tactic to bully the government. He stated: “The lawsuit is intended to force the government to the bargaining table, but also to recognize that while the law and society have changed, attitudes within government, particularly in the military, are still hostile.”

Clearly, Big Gay gets to play while we taxpayers PAY.

That’s why you must help. All of us, as Canadians, are in a culture war; and good, hard-working Canadians are being forced by the enemy’s allies within the government to pay for our own demise! This has to stop.

The Whatcott case is where we, as Canadians, must throw down the gauntlet.

The next hearing date for the Whatcott case is set for February 8 – 9th, 2017. Currently the plaintiffs are busy trying to decide on whom they will cross-examine before the cut-off date imposed by Justice Perell. I just received notice (Dec 2, 2016) that I am now on their list. I guess the optics didn’t look so good for the plaintiffs at the last hearing when Bill Whatcott’s lawyers addressed their supplementary factum and my affidavit directed at the lies and misinformation contained in the plaintiffs factum and the affidavit of Hudspeth. In desperation to look legitimate they want to now “cross-examine” me on my affidavit. I somehow don’t think this is going to help their case; I understand Justice Perell is a very astute judge.

The true test of this ridiculous case will be whether or not the Ontario Court will indulge these sex activists in what is an obvious and vexatious abuse of the Justice system. As Canadians, we hear far too often that the judicial system needs more money, and that you, the taxpayer, must be willing to give still more. I say if cases like this are allowed to proceed, then it is the courts that ought to be the target of our outrage.

I’ve undertaken to make available to you the legal documents from both sides of this matter. These materials will be published on both BillWhatcott.com & CultureGuard.com. The judicial process, a process you pay for, should be open to public scrutiny, and technology today ensures this ability. I encourage you to familiarize yourselves with the factum written by Bill Whatcott’s legal counsel, Dr. Charles Lugosi. It’s brilliant, and should be mandatory reading for every Canadian over 17 years of age.

Please donate. Every dollar counts! Legal political wars do not come cheap. 100% of your donation through the either the “Go Get Funding” button or the “Donate” button associated with CultureGuard.com will go to pay the legal expenses that will protect your right to engage in free speech and political protest and help to push the pendulum back.

btn_donateCC_LG.gif gogetfunding_logo-300x85.jpg

Give generously on behalf of yourself and those you love. The gift of freedom, liberty and justice will be the best Christmas present you’ll ever give or receive!

United for Good.

Kari Simpson

Email: cultureguard@gmail.com

Phone: 604-514-1614

http://www.cultureguard.com/

KILLING THE HUNDREDTH MONKEY: The Battle for Control and Censorship of Canada’s Internet by the B’nai Brith and the Canadian Jewish Congress By Arthur Topham

100thmonkeyhdr-copy

http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=628

KILLING THE HUNDREDTH MONKEY: The Battle for Control and Censorship of Canada’s Internet by the B’nai Brith and the Canadian Jewish Congress
By Arthur Topham
January 4, 2008

#PizzaGate Update: Titus Frost

15 Years Old Girl Survives #Pizzagate Satanic Rituals Abuse † TheWorld WeLiveIn

OMG: PIZZAGATE JUST GOT EVEN DARKER THAN ”EYES WIDE SHUT’ SGTreport.com

#PizzaGate: The Most Important Video & Transcript to Date (Must Watch) by Gary Lite

Free Speech is Dead in Canada video by BravetheWorld

freespeechdead

The Big Club, New Ben Garrison Cartoon by GrrrGraphics

https://grrrgraphics.wordpress.com/2016/12/01/the-big-club-new-ben-garrison-cartoon/

The Big Club, New Ben Garrison Cartoon

Posted on 12/01/2016

by GrrrGraphics

bengpresleverage

George Carlin once famously joked, “It’s a Big Club. And YOU ain’t in it! You and I are not in the big club….”

Only he wasn’t joking. The ‘Big Club’ exists and they are unaccountable to the people outside of it. This private club of globalists came about because we allowed them to control our system of money. At first it was the Rothschilds who gained control of the banking houses of Europe. This notorious family funded both sides of wars and cleaned up. They funded governments and ended up controlling those governments. They tried to do the same for America.

Alexander Hamilton was a stooge for European banking interests. He helped set up the first central bank to control our nation’s money. Andrew Jackson spent two terms throwing out the Rothschild snakes, and he succeeded. But the central bankers were persistent. We got the Federal Reserve foisted upon us in 1913 and the globalist bankers once again were in control. As a nation, we got poorer while we were saddled with endless war. To be sure, the very top of the pyramid continues to get stupendously richer, but that’s by design.

And now we have Trump. He was elected to drain the swamp. He may be our last hope to tip the Big Club over a cliff. He has expressed some interest in auditing the Federal Reserve. This is the first step in exposing their rampant corruption. First audit the Fed, then end the Fed. Trump also wants to bring good paying jobs back to America and close the wide open borders. The Big Club doesn’t want this.

Unfortunately Trump appointed Mnuchin, an ex-Goldman Sachs executive, as Secretary of Treasury. More ominously, Mnuchin once partnered with Soros. I would rather have seen Ron Paul become Treasury Secretary, but perhaps Trump wants a few insiders in his cabinet in order to better deal with the powers that be. Trump said Mnuchin made some ‘amazing deals.’ Fine—as long as he’s willing to deal We The People in this time.

Maybe Trump wants such insiders because they know where the bodies are buried. That way he can better expose them. Can Mnuchin help bring back Glass Steagall and end the Big Club’s stranglehold on us? It remains to be seen, but if Trump continues to dine with Romney and others from the Big Club—and then does their bidding, his feet will need to be held to the fire. Right now we can only hope that he is playing them off against one another.

Ben Garrison

 

Four Ways to Support Ben Garrison Cartoons

You can become a monthly donor on Patreon for as little as a dollar a month!

https://www.patreon.com/grrrgraphics

Make a one time Pay Pal donation

https://www.paypal.me/GrrrGraphics

Buy a T-shirt and more at the GrrrGraphics TeeSpring Shop

https://teespring.com/stores/grrrgraphics-t-shirts

Purchase signed Prints / Original Art in the Shop

http://grrrgraphics.com/shop.html

#PizzaGate New Update from Reality Calls

#PizzaGate the Documentary, Pedophilia involving Podesta Emails, Clinton, Obama, David Brock, DNC by Titus Frost

#PizzaGate: What We Know So Far: Video by Reality Calls

#PizzaGate: What We Know So Far:

President Donald Trump—Israel’s Pick for War in Iran? by James M. (“Mel”) Rockefeller

http://hiddentaxonhumanity.com/uncategorized/mel-rockefeller-commentary/mel-rockefeller-commentary/

screen-shot-2016-11-28-at-9-17-52-am

screen-shot-2016-11-28-at-9-18-34-am

rpednew400-copy-3-copy-2

Editor’s Note: This is an excellent background source of information on the players behind the scenes. Mel’s presentation here is, for the greater part, most valuable. One thing which I am in disagreement over is the following statement concerning Truman and the Holohoax where Mel writes under the subheading ‘If it looks like fascism‘: “Without the mass murder of the WWII Holocaust, even Harry Truman, a dysfunctional Zionist Christian Democrat, could not have been persuaded to recognize this enclave as a legitimate state.”

Whether Truman was aware at the time that he was being scammed is another thing but today we know that there wasn’t any Jewish Holocaust.

—-

President Donald Trump—Israel’s Pick for War in Iran?

by James M. (“Mel”) Rockefeller

November 26th, 2016

The pro-Israelis who produced the presidency of the dysfunctional George Bush to take us to war in Iraq also produced the presidency of narcissist Donald Trump—to take us to war in Iran. Were that not the case, the Trump transition would not be dominated by pro-Israeli right-wingers. Below I show how supporters of the Israeli Right delivered an Electoral College victory for a reality show host who remains unaware who is manipulating his self-absorbed needs on behalf of Tel Aviv.

As can be proven by my life experience as the out-of-wedlock son of Nelson Rockefeller, Jewish elites and extremists are the source of serial wars and crises dating to no later than 1850 when Rothschild-affiliate Hallgarten & Company investment bankers opened their Manhattan office to finance both sides in the Civil War.[1] A century later, my Uncle David Rockefeller razed Hallgarten’s headquarters to build One Chase Manhattan Plaza. He also personally allied with these German-Jewish bankers from the same Hesse region as Leo Strauss, a mentor to the dominantly Jewish neoconservatives who devastated our national security by deceiving us to invade Iraq.[2]

Trump son-in-law Jared Kushner, raised in an Orthodox Jewish household, was architect of the Trump campaign’s digital and social media strategies along with senior campaign strategist Steve Bannon. In the presidential primaries, New York hedge fund manager Robert Mercer singlehandedly funded the campaign of Senator Ted Cruz, a Zionist Christian from Texas. When the Cruz campaign collapsed, Mercer shifted his support to Trump and to funding Cambridge Analytica, specialists in data mining and analysis as key to voter targeting.

In the U.K., Cambridge Analytics (CA) identified “persuadable” voters to win a surprise electoral victory for those who sought to see Britain exit the European Union (Brexit). In the U.S., CA claims to have collected up to 5,000 data points on more than 220 million Americans. When Ted Cruz won in the Iowa caucuses, CA and its Mercer-funded “behavioral microtargeting” was credited with the win. CA has such confidence in its profiling that it claims a capacity to detect aspects of a voter’s personality that he may not even know himself.

Its data mining relies heavily on “onboarding”—the self-profiling done voluntarily online, much of it on Facebook. Those data points enable microtargeting to segment voter audiences so that psychographic advertisements can be sent online as “dark posts” seen by no one but those targeted.[3] Thus, for instance, selected Black voters were targeted in key electoral states to receive reminders that Hillary Clinton used “super predator” language offensive to Blacks. Online personality data informs the content and tone of the messages sent.

Instead of heavy reliance on more conventional media buys, the Trump campaign invested in digital, especially Facebook-enabled micro-targeting. Stuck more in a traditional media model, Clinton outspent Trump an estimated 3:1 on less effective media. Since his victory, he’s changed his position on at least a half-dozen hot-button issues that motivated those targeted to vote, including his stances on immigration, deportation, Obamacare, waterboarding, climate change and a promise to name a federal prosecutor to fulfill an anti-Clinton demand (“Lock her Up.”) among Trump supporters.[4]

The point, however, is not which issues he bailed on, the point is which ones has he not: unflinching support for Israel, opposition to the nuclear accord with Iran and support for Israeli settlements in the occupied territories, a stance certain to reduce any chance of a two-state solution.[5]

Pre-staging The Donald

Pro-Israelis inside the Trump Organization include general counsel Jason Greenblatt, bankruptcy attorney David M. Friedman (a two-state solution skeptic), special counsel Michael Cohen and key family members, including son-in-law Kushner and his wife Ivanka Trump who converted to Orthodox Judaism. Israeli settlers were heartened by an interview that Greenblatt, lately described as a foreign policy adviser to Trump, gave to Israel’s Army Radio after the election in which he said that Trump did not view the settlements as “an obstacle for peace.” That statement led to several pronouncements in Israel claiming, “the era of the Palestinian state is over.”[6]

Greenblatt lived in a settlement in Israel. Post-election rumors speculated he could be appointed as Trump’s Middle East envoy though Kushner is also seen as qualified. Kushner is a real estate developer and Greenblatt a real estate attorney. Neither have diplomatic experience.

Israeli Ambassador Ron Dermer has repeatedly visited the transition team. An American who forfeited his U.S. citizenship to serve Israel, he’s a key Trump intermediary not only for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu but also Sheldon Adelson, the casino mogul who spends an estimated $50 million per year publishing a widely read free newspaper supportive of Netanyahu and the Israeli Right.[7] Dermer arranged for Republican Congressional leaders to secretly invite Netanyahu to deliver a nationally televised speech on March 3, 2016 to a joint meeting of Congress in opposition to then ongoing negotiations on the Iran nuclear accord—that Trump now opposes.

Six days later, Arkansas Senator Tom Cotton sought to undermine negotiations by releasing a letter to Iranian leaders signed by 47 Republican Senators suggesting that any accord with Iran could be undone by the next president. The role played by Israel and its lobby was apparent. Those skeptical that a 37-year old freshman Senator could take this step on his own noted that Cotton’s Senate campaign received nearly $1 million just five months earlier from the Emergency Committee for Israel led by Jewish neoconservative William Kristol, co-founder of the Project for a New American Century established in 1997 to lobby for regime change in Iraq and now Iran.

In 2012, Dermer broke with long-standing diplomatic protocol to campaign for Mitt Romney, the Republican presidential candidate, an opponent of the Iran deal and, importantly, a Mormon.[8] Also known as the Lost Tribe of Israel, youth in this uniquely American version of Zionism are routinely recruited for employment in the F.B.I. and our intelligence services, an issue to which I will return.[9]

By stirring up the settlements issue, the Israel Right may well ignite another war-catalyzing intifada reminiscent of the Ariel Sharon-led March to the Al Aqsa Mosque (Temple Mount) in September 2000. That provocative armed march triggered the Second (Al Aqsa) Intifada one year prior to the provocation of 9/11. Sharon organized that march after helping ensure the failure of international negotiations on a proposed agreement to designate Jerusalem an international city protected for use by adherents of all three faiths that consider the city sacred.

Purposefully aggravating the settlements issue is also consistent with the influence wielded within the Republican Party by Sheldon Adelson. He and his equally rightwing Israeli wife used their influence to ensure that any mention of the two-state solution was removed from the Republican Party platform. Democrats saw a similar scouring of their platform by the Israeli Right when the term “occupied territories” was stricken.

Adding to those provocations, the Knesset took up legislation allowing settlers to gain title to privately owned Palestinian land on which they illegally built. As usual with rightwing pro-Israelis, multiple goals are pursued at the same time. Senator Pat Leahy of Vermont summarized how:

“One of the most effective ways that ISIS and other terrorist groups have attracted recruits is by tarring the United States with Israel’s expanding occupation of the West Bank. This legislation to retroactively legalize illegal settlements will be welcomed by those murderous groups as further evidence that America’s closest ally in the region is bent on destroying a peaceful solution, including the possibility of a Palestinian state.”[10]

Election By Way of Deception

Taking full advantage of the new media ecosystem offered by social media, the Trump team was the primary beneficiary of an onslaught of fake news as one in five social-media users modified their views about a political or social issue due to a social media post, according to a Pew Research survey published in October 2016. Almost half of Americans now rely on Facebook as a source of news. According to BuzzFeed, among the 20 most popular fake election stories that generated the most audience engagement on Facebook in the last three months of the campaign, all but three were either pro-Trump or anti-Hillary.

During that period, the top-performing made-up election stories on Facebook generated more engagement than the top 20 stories by established media outlets, including the New York Times, Washington Post and NBC News. The fact-displacing/opinion-shaping capacity of social media was used to great effect by digital strategist Jared Kushner and political strategist Steve Barron. Profiling voters is now like “baking a cake” according to Cambridge Analytics. Microtarget those voters required to win key electoral states and victory goes to the campaign best able to support its data points with appealing psychographics. “Facebook is the microtargeter’s ultimate weapon.”

Though this Facebook-enabled duplicity was well known for at least two years, only after this pro-Israeli victory did Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg concede a need to address the problem. On the 15th anniversary of 9/11, Facebook’s ‘trending’ algorithms directed its 1.8 billion users to a “9/11 Truther” conspiracy theory claiming that the attacks were orchestrated by the U.S. government.[11] The next day it was announced that Facebook and Israel agreed to work together to rein in content that Israel says incites violence.[12]

By tweaking its algorithms to reduce “click bait,” it’s long been known that Facebook editors can put a political campaign out of business. Or favor a campaign its editors favor. Analysts have since confirmed that much of the fake news was targeted at Facebook users in swing states such as Florida and Ohio, benefitting Trump’s campaign.[13] Exposure of its role in the 2016 election will provide Facebook with the excuse it needs to censor online content—such as this—that exposes the shared pro-Israeli bias of those using this social media platform to win an election—by way of deception.

The Next (Israeli) Narrative

Post-election, those who produced the Trump presidency began to assemble a transition team, aided by a corps of Jewish advisers to the Trump Organization.[14] His campaign advisers include General Keith Kellogg who served as chief operating officer for the Coalition Provisional Authority that governed Iraq following the 2003 invasion. It was on his watch that U.S. Ambassador Paul Bremer disbanded the Sunni-dominant Republican Guard that became ISIL. No one knows how much of the 363 tons of U.S. currency flown into Iraq on his watch found its way into the hands of ISIL.

When Congressman Dan Pompeo, a critic of the Iran accord, was named by Trump as Director of the C.I.A., the Republican Jewish Coalition (funded by casino multi-billionaire Sheldon Adelson) described him as a “wonderful choice” and a “true friend of Israel.”[15] When Mitt Romney made Trump’s short list as a potential Secretary of State, the war-with-Iran agenda came sharply back into focus. A lay bishop in the Mormon Church, a Romney Administration would by now have led us into Israel’s long-sought war with Iran.

During Romney’s 2012 campaign, foreign policy adviser Dan Senor told journalists that if Israel launched a strike on Iran’s nuclear facilities, Romney “would respect the move.” Regardless of their personal differences (Romney called Trump a “phony” and a “fraud”), his hardline position on Iran qualified Romney to serve as Trump’s Secretary of State.

Should Romney be included in a Trump administration, Trump will be portrayed as magnanimous and Romney’s role will be cast as unifying the party. In truth, it will confirm that Zionists have consolidated their power in a presidency produced for the purpose of taking us to war in Iran. Those promoting the narrative of “Russian interference” in our presidential election fail to mention that Israeli Ambassador Ron Dermer campaigned for Romney; Netanyahu was prominently featured in a Romney campaign ad warning of the Iranian threat.

Romney adviser Dan Senor hailed Pompeo as a “superb pick” (Romney’s July 2012 trip to Israel is described as the “brainchild” of Senor and Dermer).[16] As chief spokesperson for the Coalition Provisional Authority and senior adviser to Bremer,[17] Senor put a positive spin on the disastrous post-invasion policies that devastated Iraq and catalyzed the emergence of ISIL.[18] While in Iraq, the neoconservative Senor represented not U.S. but Israeli interests.[19]

The Trump transition confirms that Jewish elites and extremists have amassed enough control that they can pick presidential advisers able to shape U.S. foreign policy for the next fifty years. If we see another mass murder that can plausibly be blamed on “radical Islamic extremists,” President Barack Obama will be responsible due to his failure to engage the facts of what can be proven by my life experience. Had the intelligence I uncovered in Iraq been engaged in good faith by the FBI on my return from Baghdad in February 1997, Saddam Hussein could have been removed without a war.[20]

The FBI is complicit in blocking an investigation able to confirm that the source of this corruption traces to those skilled at waging war “by way of deception,” the operating motto of the Israeli intelligence services. To avoid engagement, FBI agents (many of them Mormons) repeatedly sought to portray me as the problem.[21] As my father pointed out in a 1964 speech at Harvard University during his second of four terms as Governor of New York, the greatest threat to our nation are those with a “tireless genius for crisis.” Thus the well-timed revival of Hillary Clinton’s email scandal ten days prior to the election by FBI Director James Comey, creating a campaign crisis that helped shift votes to Trump.

Pro-Israeli Steve Bannon

Trump “senior strategic counsel” Steve Bannon was recruited as an adviser late in the campaign from the “alt-right” Breitbart News where he served as Executive Chairman. His prominent role in the Trump presidency set off charges that he is a white nationalist, a racist and an anti-Semite. That false portrayal lays the foundation for manipulating both the Black Lives Matter movement and hate-mongering white power advocates.[22]

Bannon is a political product of the Israeli Right. After working at The Drudge Report and The Huffington Post, Andrew Breitbart’s concept for Breitbart News originated—while in Israel—as a media outlet that would be unapologetically pro-Israel. On his death in 2012, he was praised by pro-Israelis Mitt Romney, Rick Santorum and Newt Gingrich. Like his former boss, Bannon lavishes praise on extremists among the pro-Israeli Right, including Ted Cruz, Sarah Palin and Michele Bachmann.

When Israeli Ambassador Ron Dermer left his meeting with President-elect Trump, he was quick to praise Bannon as was Zionist Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz. In 2015, Bannon joined Breitbart CEO Larry Solov (also Jewish) to launch Breitbart Jerusalem “specifically to cover the region from an unabashedly Zionist perspective.”[23] He also hosted 29 interviews with Frank Gaffney whose Center for Security Policy is known for its ultra-right Zionist views. As Bannon put it, Gaffney is “doing amazing work, doing God’s work…Just fantastic.”[24]

Tellingly, Bannon featured six interviews with Pamela Geller (“her time has come”). Founder of the pro-Israeli, Islam-bashing American Freedom Defense Institute, she was an outspoken post-9/11 opponent of the so-called “ground zero mosque,” an effort supported by Robert Mercer. Geller was also one of five recipients of a Zionist “manifesto” written by Norwegian Anders Behring Breivik who killed 77 people on July 22, 2011 to draw attention to his manifesto.[25] That mass murder marks when Zionist extremists shifted their focus from anti-Semitism to anti-Islam.

Based on Bannon’s well-known support for the Israeli Right, one can only marvel at media attempts to brand him anti-Semitic. That false portrayal only further heightens my concern at how soon that deceptive portrayal will be used to support the next agenda-advancing crisis. Those who wage war by way of deception routinely pre-stage collateral crises to draw attention away from a main event—such as destroying the nuclear accord with Tehran. Based on the media coverage given both to the Black Lives Matter narrative and the white nationalist narrative, conflicts based on race or ethnicity are poised to obscure the manipulation of Trump to take us to war in Iran.

When candidate Trump did not immediately disavow the endorsement of David Duke, a former Ku Klux Klan leader, that delay both energized his alt-right base and laid the foundation for a race-based conflict. The parallels with how fascists assumed power in Germany are chilling. Only this time, anti-Islam rather than anti-Semitism is positioned as the hate-mongering catalyst. With a mass murder provocation (such as a dirty bomb) plausibly traceable to “radical Islamic extremists,” it’s easy to imagine how an anti-Islam version of Kristallnacht could lead to the burning of mosques and the murder of Muslims.[26] That violence, in turn, could ignite racially motivated riots—particularly if such civil unrest helps distract attention from those pre-staging another war in the Middle East.

But For the U.S.-Israel Relationship

Had the U.S. not agreed to a “special relationship” with the Zionist experiment now known as Israel, would a U.S. president-elect, in effect, be assembling a War Cabinet? I’ve no reason to believe that Donald Trump is aware of how his personal needs were profiled and serviced to produce this presidency.[27] When, as President-elect, he met with Barack Obama in the Oval Office, he looked like a deer in the headlights. His need to protect his ego, his image and the Trump brand makes him highly susceptible to manipulation by those who will use him just as numerous other presidents.

Trillions of dollars have been wasted due to our ill-advised relationship with Israel. The tinderbox in Syria, set in motion by Israel, could trigger the next global military crisis. When CNN describes conditions in Aleppo as a Holocaust, you know manipulators of the national narrative are nearby.[28] Notwithstanding CNN’s pro-Israeli reporting, we still do not know if the use of chemical weapons in Syria was a false flag attack meant to induce us to wage war in Syria as an interim step to take us to war in Iran—for Israel.[29] What we do know is that an emergent Trump Administration is thoroughly rightwing pro-Israel.

Senate Democrats elected pro-Israeli New York Senator Chuck Schumer as Minority Leader and Illinois Senator Dick Durbin as Minority Whip. No media outlet mentioned that Durbin was handpicked by the Israel lobby in 1982 to replace Congressman Paul Findley and then groomed for the Senate. That 1982 race was the first time the Zionist lobby openly removed a member of Congress when Findley committed political suicide by challenging Israeli policy.[30] By promising unity between Democrats and Republicans, Schumer made it more difficult to identify the influence of Israel and its lobby when another Pearl Harbor-like provocation is staged to induce another war in the Middle East.

When Schumer announced the new Senate leadership, he signaled Israeli confidence in what can be accomplished with Trump and his pro-Israeli team in the White House and pro-Israeli Republicans and Democrats in key positions in the Congress. When introducing his Senate team, including progressive Bernie Sanders,[31] this Zionist New Yorker described the two parties as standing “shoulder-to-shoulder.” That signature phrase was made famous by rightwing Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon when he routinely used it to describe how, after 9/11, the U.S. and Israel would stand “shoulder-in-shoulder” in combating terrorism.

That word choice serves as ‘code’ signaling Israelis and pro-Israelis much as, ten days prior to 9/11, Tel Aviv announced a $1 million gift to Israeli spy Jonathan Pollard who did more to undermine U.S. national security than any American in history—and then was granted Israeli citizenship.[32] As a former C.I.A. Director conceded, the 9/11 attacks took ten years to plan and execute and required the assistance of a stable nation-state with intelligence operations inside the U.S. That description fits only one nation.

The Cost of an Entangled Alliance

Both Hillary Clinton in 2016 and Al Gore in 2000 won the popular vote. In both cases, their loss in the Electoral College traced to states such as Florida where pro-Israelis wield outsized influence. The Trump campaign lacked the “ground game” to generate those electoral results. Thus the micro-targeting of voters as Kushner, Bannon and Co. focused on a few key states. That outcome was shaped by those who wanted the malleable Trump in 2016 just as they wanted the dysfunctional Dubya in 2000—to wage a war for Israel. Hillary Clinton was far less likely to invade Iran.

She attended enough classified briefings to know the role that Israel and its lobby play in deceiving us to act against our interests. The same holds true for Al Gore who was too knowledgeable and, unlike Dubya, too functional to lead us to war in the Middle East. By manipulating the 2000 election to make it appear that George Bush stole the election, pro-Israeli operatives retained a plausible cover (“We really wanted Gore.”) had the intelligence I gathered in Baghdad been engaged in good faith.[33]

They required Dubya and his unfulfilled needs to pull off 9/11 and induce him to remove Saddam. Making it appear that Trump stole the election is a “double blind cover”[34] meant to obscure the fact that Jewish elites and extremists knew they could more easily manipulate Trump’s needs than persuade Hillary to advance their agenda as she did in Libya. Though a hawk, Hillary Clinton—like Al Gore—would have been far more difficult to manipulate. Trump’s needy ego makes him easy.

Dubya was deceived to lead our allies into an unnecessary war reliant on false and outright fixed intelligence. Deploying classic game theory warfare, Tel Aviv knew it could rely on the Sunni-Shia conflict to catalyze the radical Islamic extremists of ISIL. An invasion-induced cascade of reactions reignited an ancient conflict-of-opposites (Sunni vs. Shia) that, in turn, e

nabled Israel to ally with Saudi Arabia, its perceived enemy with a shared dislike of Iran.[35] The only winner: Jewish elites and extremists skilled at leveraging their small numbers to great effect through game theory warfare.[36]

The Bush/Trump Doctrine

When Israeli policy was embraced as the Bush Doctrine (“go anywhere and kill anyone seen as a threat”), the U.S. forfeited its moral leadership. That’s a key reason Zionists wanted George Bush and Dick Cheney in 2000 not Al Gore and Joe Lieberman. Plus Israel needed Lieberman in the Senate post-9/11 as the key salesman—along with John McCain—of the false intelligence that induced us to pursue Israel’s destabilizing regime change strategy in Iraq, a nation that played no role in 9/11. With the Israel lobby emboldened and John McCain again serving as chairman of the Senate Committee on Armed Services, the risks of another war remain very real.

Without the mass murder provocation of 3,000 people on 9/11, Zionist Christian George W. Bush could not have been induced to lead the U.S. and its allies to war in Iraq in March 2003. When, in March 2015, right-winger Bibi Netanyahu addressed a joint meeting of Congress in an attempt to scuttle negotiations with Tehran, had a crisis been staged with U.S. casualties—plausibly traceable to Tehran—the major world powers would not now enjoy a nuclear accord with Iran. Thus the ongoing risk of continuing an alliance with an enclave of extremists known to have a “tireless genius for crisis” and a history of waging wars “by way of deception.”

Those who induced Donald Trump to run for president (he never expected to win) prompted his promise to scrap that accord. If he withdraws U.S. support, the accord will remain in place. The impact would ensure that we isolate ourselves internationally, alienate our allies and further discredit ourselves worldwide, leaving us with Israel as one of our few remaining allies, an outcome that his transition team advisers appear to relish. That agenda could be accelerated with another mass murder during the transition period or early on in the Trump presidency—as with Bush less than nine months after his inaugural.[37]

History Repeats Itself

Trump son-in-law Jared Kushner may be the Eddie Jacobson of the Trump Presidency. After serving together in the same artillery unit during WWI, Jacobson and Harry Truman returned to Kansas City to open a haberdashery that soon failed. That’s when the Pendergast component of organized crime began producing Truman’s political career, placing him in the Senate in 1934 and grooming his career to ensure he would become president with the death of President Franklin Roosevelt in April 1945. Truman and Roosevelt had spoken only twice prior to that fateful day.

Three years later, Zionist Chaim Weizmann appealed to Jacobson’s Jewish identity to have him plead with Truman for a meeting. After assurances from Weizmann that the Jewish state would not do what it has since done, that meeting induced a Zionist Christian President to recognize as a legitimate state an enclave of Jewish elites and extremists—over the objections of his Secretary of State George Marshall, the diplomatic corps, the C.I.A. and the Pentagon’s Joint Chiefs of Staff who feared that Zionists would draw the U.S. into serial conflicts in the region.[38]

Since managing the Trump digital media campaign, Jared Kushner has become a trusted voice of the transition team tasked with staffing the executive branch with the 4,700+ positions that an incoming president appoints. The influence of Mitt Romney supporters Bibi Netanyahu and Sheldon Adelson became apparent when Trump agreed to meet with Romney who both men supported for president in 2012, anticipating he would lead us to war with Iran. Now they are relying on Trump and those to whom he is being induced to turn for advice. His 35-year old Orthodox Jewish son-in-law signaled his expertise—and interest—in brokering an accord between Israel and the Palestinians.

Selling Conflicts of Opposites

As Russian President Vladimir Putin conceded in July 2013 at the Jewish Museum in Moscow, the first Soviet government “was 80-85 percent Jewish.” In the U.S., the expansive Israel lobby—founded as the American Zionist Council—has long been feared for its political influence. Add to that power the role played by mainstream media and the major film studios (both dominantly Jewish-owned or controlled) and it becomes clear how difficult it is to protect our national interests from those adept at manipulating our national narrative to “wage war by way of deception.”

As the profitable Cold War conflict-of-opposites receded into the background, the storyline of the West vs. Islam emerged in the foreground as a new opportunity for war profiteering. A Vladimir Putin-led Russia poses an existential threat not to the U.S. but to those hoping to use the Trump presidency to take us to war in Iran, an effort the Russian leader is certain to resist. Those promoting that war are busily reviving The Clash of Civilizations, an agenda-advancing narrative first coined in 1990 by Zionist Bernard Lewis, a professor at Princeton University. The portrayal of Vladimir Putin as the foreign manipulator of our presidential election is meant to obscure both an electoral manipulation and manipulation of the national narrative by Zionists and their lobby.

Here’s one example of the sinister, costly and profitable nature of this duplicity. In the seven-year interval between the Communist-bashing House Un-American Activities Committee hearings of 1947 and the Senate’s “Red Scare” McCarthy hearings in 1954, Hallgarten & Co. investment banker Donald Stralem produced the film Duck And Cover. Shown by mandatory attendance to more than 40 million American schoolchildren nationwide, the film instructed them, when they saw the flash of an atomic bomb, to duck under their desks and cover their heads. At a 1951 cost of $350,000 ($3.2 million in 2016 dollars), this senior manager of Rothschild interests in the U.S. succeeded with this film in terrifying an entire generation of post-WWII Baby Boomer children and their parents.[39]

The rationale cited for that psy-ops film was the “emotion management” requirements of Civil Defense during the Truman presidency. Stralem’s true goal was to internalize—at an early age—the fear and insecurity required to ensure support for decades of Cold War defense spending. That 9-1/2 minute film seared into the national psyche the threat of an imminent “atomic bomb” attack by the Soviet Evil Doers.[40] With the help of Hollywood, pliable politicians and mainstream media, that internalized narrative sustained tens of trillions of dollars in national security spending from WWII until the collapse of the Soviet Union. That perceived threat was recently revived along with another costly price tag—a pledge to spend $1 trillion on updating and upgrading America’s vast nuclear arsenal—despite knowing the weapons can never be used. Thus the need to cast Vladimir Putin as an Evil Doer to revive the profitable Cold War conflict-of-opposites.

The depth and duration of this duplicity can be difficult to grasp. In 1948, Chaim Weizmann assured Harry Truman that the Zionists would take no more land. Now we know that’s what they intended all along. Ariel Sharon assured us that, if Saddam Hussein were removed, they would make peace with the Palestinians. Now they’ve made a two-state solution impossible and extremist members of Israel’s rightwing governing coalition seek to grant legal title to privately owned Palestinian lands occupied by Jewish settlers who believe they have a God-given right to that land.

Both Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump proposed to relocate our embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, granting Zionists the worldwide perception that U.S. leaders recognize that ancient city as “the eternal capital of Israel.” That provocation would be certain to outrage Muslims worldwide and further endanger the U.S. The history of this “special relationship” suggests that’s precisely the outcome intended by the Israeli Right.

Pre-staging the Next Conflict-of-Opposites

The mainstream media portrays Trump supporters as uneducated white nationalists and racists when in truth, many of them are upset at being left behind by Washington’s embrace of the financial markets-obsessed “consensus” model of economics and the job-displacing forces set in motion by today’s version of globalization. When it becomes clear to this disaffected base that Donald Trump is unable to deliver what he promised—and they expect—they will mobilize. If those who produced the Trump presidency can induce him to lead us into another war, we could see this nation fracture as never before under the strain of multiple crises, generating an outcome that will only further empower those doing this.

The annual budget for the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) now totals $42 billion. The Patriot Act, drafted well prior to 9/11, authorizes suspension of the Constitution, including habeas corpus. DHS was founded not to protect Americans from radical Islamic extremists but to protect the perpetrators from Americans when they realize that this duplicity traces to a common source.[41]

If, as the facts suggest, the goal is to trigger domestic violence, the DHS (and the National Guard) can be mobilized to detain the disaffected, including Trump’s base—adding outrage to their frustration, resentment and disillusionment. Based on the pre-staging to date, the most likely conflict-of-opposites will be provoked between those branded as white nationalists and those active in the Black Lives Matter movement for social justice.

Political strategist Steve Bannon is being branded by mainstream media as a plausible instigator conspiring from the shadows to mobilize the disgruntled alt-right. This social media-savvy adviser knows how to mobilize dissenters to achieve a political objective, as he proved on November 8th. Conventional politics can be displaced with the use of divisive rhetoric (that can later be disavowed) designed to penetrate online “filter bubbles” and reach the disaffected in their social media silos. For those skilled at advancing their goals under the cover of well-timed crisis, he’s perfect.

If It Looks Like Fascism…

No one knows what will happen when Americans become well informed and angry enough to realize that their liberty depends on freeing their government from the outsized influence wielded by Israel, pro-Israelis and the Israel lobby.

What we now see emerging is Fascism Lite. Donald Trump’s easily profiled ego ensures he will do whatever is required to keep from being exposed as a political fraud and a reality show clown. That doesn’t mean he’s an evil person, only that he can be easily influenced by those masterful at manipulating the needs of such assets. With both houses of Congress in the hands of pro-Israeli Republicans and the White House in the hands of rightwing pro-Israelis, the Zionist vision of global domination by The Chosen is now seen by Them as a real possibility.

An enemies list is usually the first step in creating a fascist state as we saw in Germany in the 1930s. Lists created during the “Red scare” of the 1950s (traceable to this same trans-generational syndicate) helped consolidate the Far Right control now emergent in Washington. When this rightward political tilt interacts with those with a ‘tireless genius for crisis,’ the outcome risks the suspension of key rights guaranteed under the Constitution.

Those complicit in this duplicity have long operated in the U.S. and worldwide as war profiteers. Their genius for well-timed crisis enables them to create serial conflicts-of-opposites (the two sides are irrelevant) in order to profit off the misery of both. As their Cold War wound down, they ramped up radical Islam as their new profit-making narrative. Muslims are now the target of hate just as the broader Jewish community was targeted by those who produced the conditions that created German Chancellor Adolph Hitler. Anti-Semitism enabled these duplicitous few to hide in plain sight as WWII segued seamlessly into the profitable Cold War and, without missing a beat, the War on Islam.

Without the mass murder of the WWII Holocaust, even Harry Truman, a dysfunctional Zionist Christian Democrat, could not have been persuaded to recognize this enclave as a legitimate state. Without the mass murder of 9/11, even George Bush, a dysfunctional Zionist Christian Republican, could not have been persuaded to invade Iraq, a nation that had nothing to do with 9/11. At each hinge of modern history, the facts point to the same source of duplicity.

Those complicit financed both sides in our Civil War of the 1860s. Even now, no one can explain how the world’s great powers were induced to wage the senseless slaughter of WWI. The post-war reparations burden imposed on Germany was certain to humiliate a proud people, catalyzing an angry reaction that—consistent with classic game theory warfare—ensured the emergence of an extremist form of nationalism (sound familiar?) that morphed into the National Socialist German Workers Party (Nazis).

The past 150+ years have been a study in senseless murder, mayhem and forgone opportunities while a sociopathic few profited off the misery of millions. That includes our being induced to wage an earlier unwinnable war in Vietnam that killed more than 58,000 Americans and as many as 1.5 million Vietnamese—for what? President Kennedy wanted us to disengage. After his murder, successor Lyndon Johnson, another Zionist Christian, led us even deeper into that morass. When he withdrew from the presidential race in March 1968, a Henry Kissinger-advised Richard Nixon expanded the war into Cambodia and Laos, enabling another five years of war-profiteering.

In the age of transparency, those doing this—over centuries—know they risk exposure. With exposure comes the prospect of accountability under law for crimes against humanity. That possibility may motivate those chronicled to stage crises that are more severe in their impact and more wide-ranging in their reach. For those who view themselves as the Chosen of God accountable only to God, they may opt for self-destruction rather than personal responsibility.

Who Should Be Held Accountable?

Accountability must begin by acknowledging that the Israeli Right has long manipulated Jewish identity and preyed on the fear and insecurity of the broader Jewish community who in 1948 knew that Zionist elites and extremists posed a threat to their assimilation. Skeptics of the Zionist experiment have been proven correct—at enormous cost to the U.S. and other nations induced to ally with the Jewish state. The consistency of the behavior exhibited by the Israeli Right confirms that Albert Einstein and 27 other prominent Jews were correct in 1948 when describing them as “Jewish fascists” while Jewish novelist Hannah Arendt called them simply “Jewish Nazis.”

This is not “a people” doing this. Those responsible are our leaders—both civilian and military—who knew about this yet continued to allow those complicit to operate with legal impunity. That includes President Barack Obama who has long been aware of what can be proven by my life experience profiling those who specialize in befriending in order to betray and creating relationships of trust in order to defraud. Israel is not a friend but an enemy within. The cost of their treachery is incalculable—and growing.

I was encouraged by a November 20 comment by Henry Kissinger when he pointed out that Donald Trump comes to office with “absolutely no baggage” in foreign policy. However, the pro-Israeli baggage picked up during the transition may corrupt his presidency before it begins. No U.S. President can Make America Great Again without dramatically reforming—or discarding—the U.S.-Israel relationship. This entangled alliance has for far too long imposed a hidden tax on humanity.

[1] Donald Stralem was the son of Hallgarten co-founder Casimir Stralem. For the role played by Donald Stralem in placing a Rothschild operative in my home when I was four years old, see the draft introduction to The Hidden Tax on Humanity: http://hiddentaxonhumanity.com/hidden-tax-on-humanity/introduction-2/

[2] Leo Strauss also played a key role in the “pagan fascism” that served as the foundation for what became the Nazis led by Adolph Hitler. For an overview of the multi-decade role played in this systemic criminality by my Uncle David Rockefeller, see draft excerpts from The Hidden Tax on Humanity posted on www.hiddentaxonhumanity.com

[3] http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/20/opinion/the-secret-agenda-of-a-facebook-quiz.html?_r=0

[4] This combination of self-profiling and micro-targeting dates to no later than the ‘tear sheets’ included in magazines such as Seventeen and T.V. Guide owned by Triangle Publications controlled by Walter Annenberg, son of Moses (“Mo”) Annenberg, a former Chicago mobster and innovator of the racing wire service that served as a financial backbone for the National Crime Syndicate. Owner of the influential Philadelphia Inquirer, Walter Annenberg was Ronald Reagan’s “best friend for 50 years” according to First Lady Nancy Reagan.

[5] Walid Phares claims that his promise to relocate the U.S. embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem ill be done under consensus. That’s the only Israel issue on which there’s been any change in Trump’s radically pro-Israeli stance.

http://www.vox.com/world/2016/11/15/13629690/trump-israel-palestine-peace-process-settlements-jerusalem

[6] http://forward.com/news/national/338915/no-experience-necessary-meet-trumps-orthodox-israel-advisor/

[7] Dermer, the closest adviser to Netanyahu, co-authored with Natan Sharansky The Case for Democracy. The book was endorsed by President George W. Bush who was known to be a non-reader.

[8] Dermer’s father and his brother both served as mayor of Miami Beach. The role they played in local politics further confirms why I was criminally stalked when visiting that city in 2005 and again in 2013.

[9] I was routinely stalked by Mormons, including during my youth in Michigan where Mormon George Romney, Mitt’s father, served as Governor, in Arizona by Warren Rustand and in Orange County, California by Doug Skeen. See Guilt By Association—How Deception and Self-Deceit Took America to War (2008). See also online draft chapters for The Hidden Tax on Humanity. The “Introduction” and “The Indonesia Connection” can be found on www.hiddentaxonhumaniy.com

[10] “Israel’s Alarming Settlement Bill,” New York Times (editorial), November 17, 2016.

[11] The 44 percent figure is attributed to a Pew survey reported in Joseph Dussault, “Facebook’s news algorithm promotes 9/11 ‘truther’ article,” The Christian Science Monitor, September 11, 2016.

[12] “Facebook and Israel to work to monitor posts that incite violence,” The Guardian, September 12, 2016.

[13] “The harsh truth about fake news,” Financial Times, November 22, 2016, p. 9.

[14] See Armin Rosen, “Trump’s Jews,” Tablet, July 15, 2016.

[15] That Zionist agenda motivated casino mogul Sheldon Adelson and his equally rightwing Israeli wife to give more than $150 million to the 2012 presidential campaigns of former House Speaker Newt Gingrich and Mitt Romney. In June 2016, Gingrich urged the creation of a new House Un-American Activities Committee to combat Islamic extremists. He said nothing about Jewish extremists. It’s unclear how much of Adelson’s $32.8 billion personal fortune was deployed to sway voters in the key Electoral College states required for Trump to become Commander-in-Chief. The Adelsons publish a free daily newspaper that has become the most-read publication in Israel. Devoted to promoting the rightwing views of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, the Adelsons lose a reported $50 million per year on the paper.

[16] In September 2012, Senor said that Obama’s failure to overthrow Syrian President Assad made the U.S. look “impotent.” In May 2008, Senor joined a delegation that accompanied President Bush to Jerusalem for the celebration of Israel’s 60th anniversary.

[17] Senor previously advised Lt. General Jay Garner who was appointed in 2003 as Director of the Office for Reconstruction and Humanitarian Assistance for Iraq following the March 2003 invasion. He was soon replaced by Ambassador Paul Bremer and the successor organization to ORHA, the Coalition Provisional Authority (CPA).

[18] Dan Senor exemplifies the nonlinear way that this influence works without the public’s knowledge and regardless of political affiliation. In 2009, he founded the Foreign Policy Initiative (FPI) with neocon Republicans William Kristol and Robert Kagan, co-founders in 1997 of the now defunct Project for A New American Century advocating regime change in Iraq—to which FPI is a successor. Victoria Nuland, Kagan’s wife and Obama Administration Assistant Secretary of State for Europe, was active in bringing about regime change in Ukraine, including a February 2014 phone call with the U.S. ambassador to Ukraine in which she is recorded saying, “f–k the EU.” After the neocons sparked a new Cold War with a putsch in Kiev, Carl Gershman, president of the neocon National Endowment for Democracy, called for regime change in Moscow by removing Vladimir Putin who helped orchestrate Syria’s surrender of its chemical weapons and the nuclear weapons accord with Iran, undercutting Israeli plans for U.S.-led wars in those two countries.

[19] For 15 years, his sister, Wendy, ran the Jerusalem office of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee.

[20] See “The War in Iraq Could Have Been Prevented” and “The Indonesia Connection,” draft excerpts from the The Hidden Tax on Humanity posted on www.hiddentaxonhumanity.com

[21]See “The Poland Connection,” a draft excerpt from the The Hidden Tax on Humanity posted on www.hiddentaxonhumanity.com This serial criminal staking—still ongoing—was undertaken in collaboration with Israeli agents such as Jerome Corsi, author of numerous pro-Israeli psy-ops books made into New York Times best-sellers, including Unfit for Command, Atomic Iran, The Obama Nation and Why Israel Can’t Wait.

[22] Trump’s campaign stance on immigration, if pursued, threatens to further fracture the nation, beginning with some 39 “sanctuary cities” throughout the U.S.

[23] Joel B. Pollak, “Stephen K. Bannon: Friend of the Jewish People, Defender of Israel,” www.breitbart.com November 14, 2016. Mr. Pollak, who describes himself as an Orthodox Jew, serves as Senior Editor-at-Large at Breitbart News.

[24] Widely regarded as a conspiracy theorist, Gaffney began his government career in the 1970s as an assistant to neocon Richard Perle while working as an aide in the office of Democratic Senator Henry (“Scoop”) Jackson.

[25] In his writings Breivik expressed his support for the ethno-nationalism of Israel’s “far-right Zionism.” Two days prior to this mass murder, the grave in Germany holding the remains of Adolph Hitler deputy Rudolf Hesse was destroyed so it could no longer be used as a pilgrimage site by neo-Nazis. In February 2012, Geller’s website, Atlas Shrugged, published the Islam-critical film, “A Movie about Muhammad: An Idea whose Time Has Come.” Her website promotes the market fundamentalist theories of Ayn Rand (né Russian novelist Alisa Rosenbaum) that emerged as a core premise of the Washington consensus. Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan served on her board of editors. House Speaker and former Romney Vice-Presidential candidate Paul Ryan credits her writings for his entry into politics. A movie based on her bestseller, Atlas Shrugged, opened in theatres October 2012 the same week that the vice-presidential debates were televised. She earlier organized opposition to an Islamic Center near the ground zero site of 9/11. In September 2012, Geller posted ads in New York subway stations, “In any war between the civilized man and the savage, support the civilized man. Support Israel. Defeat Jihad.” U.S. District Court Judge Paul A. Engelmayer granted Geller a judgment that deemed her provocative posters free speech-protected.

[26] From November 9 to November 10, 1938, in an incident known as Kristallnacht (the breaking of glass), German Nazis torched synagogues, vandalized Jewish homes, schools and businesses and killed close to 100 Jews.

[27] My life experience suggests that Donald Trump, the son of a well-known New Jersey real estate developer, may well have been identified, profiled and his career produced, starting at an early age. He emerged as a success in an industry dominated by those profiled in a city long dominated by those profiled.

[28] Seventeen years with The Jerusalem Post, CNN anchor Wolf Blitzer is featured on “the most trusted name in news.” His broadcasting booth, branded “The Situation Room,” grants him credibility by its association with the White House Situation Room. In 1989, he published Territory of Lies, a sympathetic account of Israeli super-spy Jonathan Pollard.

[29] “During a 2015 trip to Russia, Donald Trump’s pick to be national security adviser, Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn, said he didn’t know whether the 2013 sarin gas attack in Syria was conducted by the Syrian Army or by other forces in an attempt to draw the U.S. into the conflict.” At the time of the attack, General Flynn was director of the Defense Intelligence Agency. Andrew Kaczynski, CNN, November 20, 2016.

[30] When, in 1984, the lobby bragged about their removal from Congress of Congressman Pete McCloskey and Senator Chuck Percy, that Israeli operation served notice on Congress that whatever Israel wants, Israel gets—or you’re gone.

[31] In April 2016, Senator Sanders was provided two detailed memos chronicling the common (pro-Israeli) source of this duplicity and ongoing treason, its implications for national security and the cost that this hidden tax has long imposed on people and the planet. That correspondence will be posted on www.hiddentaxonhumanity.com.

[32] Ellis Shuman, “Pollards reject $1M Israeli compensation offer,” Haaretz, August 31, 2001.

[33] See “The War in Iraq Could Have Been Prevented” posted on www.hiddentaxonhumanity.com.

[34] Double blind covers are explained in more detail on the Hidden Tax on Humanity website.

[35] Prince Turki al-Faisal, former Saudi intelligence chief and ex-ambassador to Washington and London, urged on November 10 that the Iran accord remain intact: “To scrap that willy-nilly as it were will have ramifications, and I don’t know if something else can be put in its place to guarantee that Iran will not go that route if the agreement is scrapped.”

[36] For an explanation of game theory warfare and Israeli expertise in this geostrategic form of duplicity, see Chapter 1 of Guilt By Association—How Deception and Self-Deceit Took America to War. The chapter, titled “Game Theory and the Mass Murder of 9/11,” can be found on www.hiddentaxonhumanity.com

[37] Israel is notorious for staging well-timed crises and geostrategic provocations. For example, Operation Cast Lead killed some 1,400 Palestinians, including at least 300 minors under age 18. That provocation was timed to begin two days after Christmas 2008 and conclude two days prior to the Obama inaugural of January 20, 2009. Similarly, Israel’s Operation Sinai (aka the Suez Crisis) was timed for the last week of President Dwight D. Eisenhower’s re-election campaign in November 1956. The propensity of the Israel lobby to stage war-catalyzing provocations (using well-timed crises) again became clear when WINEP’s Patrick Clawson candidly called for “crisis initiation” and a false-flag incident to “step up the pressure” for a U.S. war with Iran. Capturing such Zionist candor on film is both instructive and highly unusual. See: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PfoaLbbAix0&feature=player_embedded The Washington Institute for Near East Policy was founded as the research arm of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), a key component of the expansive Israel lobby. Founded as the American Zionist Council, Attorney General Robert Kennedy and Senator J. William Fulbright, chairman of the Committee on Foreign Relations, sought to force the Council to comply with the requirements of the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA). At the same time, President Kennedy sought to shut down the Zionists’ nuclear weapons program. With the murder of Kennedy and his replacement by Lyndon Johnson, both initiatives were abandoned. AIPAC continues to operate without FARA compliance.

[38] In late 1947, the Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS) wrote that “A decision to partition Palestine, if the decision were supported by the United States, would prejudice United States strategic interests in the Near and Middle East” to the point that “United States influence in the area would be curtailed to that which could be maintained by military force.” On March 31, 1948, the JCS released “Force Requirements for Palestine.” In that paper, they predicted that “the Zionist strategy will seek to involve [the United States] in a continuously widening and deepening series of operations intended to secure maximum Jewish objectives.” Mark Perry, “Petraeus wasn’t the first,” Foreign Policy, April 2, 2010. See also Alison Weir, Against Our Better Judgment (If America Knew, 2014).

[39] See: http://conelrad.com/duckandcover/cover.php?turtle=04

[40] White House speechwriter David Frum (Jewish) originated the phrase “Axis of Evil” that first appeared in George Bush’s 2002 State of the Union address, linking Iran, Iraq and North Korea. In 2004, neocon Richard Perle, former (Jewish) chair of the U.S. Defense Policy Board Advisory Committee, 2001-2003, co-authored with Frum An End to Evil (2004).

[41] The first head of Homeland Security was Presidential Assistant Bernie Kerik who was forced to resign when his ties to organized crime as a New York Police Commissioner became too obvious. The first Secretary of DHS was Tom Ridge, former Governor of Pennsylvania from that state’s mobbed-up political machine previously overseen by publisher and GOP diplomat Walter Annenberg, son of Chicago mobster Moses (“Mo”) Annenberg. According to Nancy Reagan, Walter was “Ronnie’s best friend for 50 years.” The second Secretary of DHS was Michael Chertoff from a long family line of rabbis and previously in charge of the criminal division at the Department of Justice where he reportedly allowed several known Mossad suspects to return to Israel after 9/11. Former Arizona Governor Janet Napolitano took over from Chertoff. In December 2005, I submitted to her and Arizona Attorney General Terry Goddard, a 3-volume compilation of facts and analyses. Had those materials been engaged in good faith and investigated, the common source of this systemic criminality and ongoing treason could have been identified and addressed almost 11 years ago.

Bibi Netanyahu

Chaim Weizmann

Chuck Schumer

Dan Pompeo

Dan Senor

Dick Durbin

Donald Starlet

Donald Trump

Duck & Cover

Eddie Jacobson

Frank Gaffney

Harry Truman

Henry Kissinger

James Comey

Jared Kushner

Jason Greenblatt

Jonathan Pollard

Keith Kellogg

Mark Zuckerberg

Pamela Geller

Paul Findley

Robert Mercer

Ron Dermer

Sheldon Adelson

Steve Bannon

Admin

CONTINUE READING…

RELATED POSTS

It Happens in Threes, Castro’s Death by Ben Garrison

https://grrrgraphics.wordpress.com/2016/11/27/it-happens-in-threes-castros-death/

It Happens in Threes, Castro’s Death

Posted on 11/27/2016

by GrrrGraphics

castro_dies_ben_garrison

They say deaths of famous people happens in threes. I have some suggestions in this cartoon for the other two.

A murdering, despicable tyrant named Fidel Castro is dead. He inflicted communism on Cuba, which he and his brother ran with an iron fist.

Castro lived to an overripe old age. Many dictators live long lives because they love power. Gollum in “The Lord of the Rings” couldn’t die as long as he possessed the Ring of Power. Even when he lost it he couldn’t die because he still lusted for the ring. It’s the same principle with tyrants. Some years ago I read a biography titled “Mao, The Unknown Story,” written by Jung Chang. When Mao was finally about to die, he resented it mightily. Not necessarily because he feared death. What he really resented was losing his power. He absolutely loved it. He was obsessed with power. So was Castro.

The globalist cabal includes old men such as Henry Kissinger, George Soros, David Rockefeller and many more. All these ancient creatures cling to life, power, influence and money. It’s as if they want to hang around long enough to see their globalist dreams come true.

The war criminal known as Henry Kissinger is a notorious figure who pushes the New World Order. He has contempt for humanity—he considers most people to be ‘useless eaters.’ Rockefeller is over 100 years old and worth many billions of dollars. He’s had multiple heart transplants. He’s more a ghoul than a human being. He’s proud to be part of a secret cabal bent on dominating the world. Or it could be he knows he can’t take his many billions of dollars with him, so he’s decided to stay on Earth permanently. Soros persistently pumps money into strategies that bring strife and division to America. He thinks a broken America can be made to accept the new world order—with Soros being one of those in charge and administering it. Currently he’s busy funding those who want to challenge Trump’s legal election.

What these people want is collectivism for humanity. It can also be called communism. They don’t really care what it’s called as long as humanity is united and enslaved under their whip. The cabal is getting more desperate which makes them more dangerous. They want to shut down free speech on the Internet. They know their propaganda arms known as the mainstream media are being held in contempt by most Americans.

These monsters can’t live forever and people are waking up.

Don’t rest in peace, Castro. You certainly don’t deserve it.

For more on Fidel Castro, listen to this excellent video by Stefan Molyneux:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2EhlTI0fte0

—Ben Garrison

Four Ways to Support Ben Garrison Cartoons

You can become a monthly donor on Patreon for as little as a dollar a month!

https://www.patreon.com/grrrgraphics

Make a one time Pay Pal donation

https://www.paypal.me/GrrrGraphics

Buy a T-shirt and more at the GrrrGraphics TeeSpring Shop

https://teespring.com/stores/grrrgraphics-t-shirts

Purchase signed Prints / Original Art in the Shop

http://grrrgraphics.com/shop.html

How Clinton and the Jew U.S. Green Party Candidate Jill Stein Are Planning a Coup to Defeat Trump By BuckleYourSeatBeltsEveryone

greenpartyrecounthdr

 

How Clinton and the Jew-controlled US Green Party Plan a Recount Coup to Defeat Trump

By 

BuckleYourSeatBeltsEveryone

November 25th, 2016

RPEdNew400-copy-3 copy 2

[Editor’s Note: The following article came in to RP as a comment associated with an earlier article titled, Donald Trump wins U.S. election in astonishing victory by ZBC. I felt that the information contained in the comment deserved to be given additional exposure in the event that these Satanic psychopaths actually attempt to pull this massive scam off.]

 

As of today (November 25th 2016) we have some “new developments” arising on the still on-going 2016 US Presidential Election Results “Front”. . .

As one would expect, we have a heavily promoted (((Jewess))) in the mix causing trouble, so please keep reading- because as at this point, practically anything could happen- and we all need to keep abreast of the situation . . .

First off, Who is Jill Stein?

Jill Stein was the Green Party candidate in this past 2016 US Presidential Election.

Jill Stein is a heavily promoted (MSMI and MSMII) Jewess.

greensteinpic-copy

By the way, something everyone needs to know about the Green Party…

Jews know that Native Americans and non-Jewish White-skinned Americans of European Christian descent- including any and all percentages of mixtures between those two peoples, are very compatible with one another. One of their common interests is the Love of Life- that is to say “Nature.” It’s a known fact. The Jews exploit this common Love continuously. They try to pit the two aforementioned compatible peoples against one another- including each of the peoples mentioned themselves. Furthermore, the Jews will even use this common, essentially unbreakable, bond to pin the American Individual against his own self! Enter the Jew-created, Jew-run “Green Party”…

“In a nutshell, the Green Party is nothing more than a “closet” Judeo-Fabian Socialist front. Yep, it’s true- and to say it is so, is not to say that you don’t Love Nature- you can still Love Nature and The Great Spirit (the Father of Jesus Christ) without having to join a Collectivist front organization. Remain an American Individual, and voluntarily cooperate with your like-minded friends without each of you having to combine (chain) your interests to that of the GROUP. Tangentville, anyway- all you need to know (for now) is that the Jews run the Green Party- and you still Love Nature, Nature still needs to be protected, respected, and revered- nothing has changed, so don’t freak out. You’ve only just (possibly) discovered that the Green Party ain’t maybe the best way to go- it’s possibly another trap- so keep your knee down. Got it? Good…”

Back to the Jewish Green Party Jewess Jill Stein . . . .

Jill Stein has recently demanded (and since been granted) a “vote recount.”

I know, I know- “Why Stein and NOT Clinton?” you’re probably (and logically) asking . . .

Because Stein is clearly operating as a “proxy” (or straw man) for Hillary Clinton. As rumor has it, (((Stein))) has been offered the job of Secretary of the Interior, or the Director of the Jew-infested US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) if she can pull off a legit looking recount request, without the American public catching wind to it- where Clinton could “take it from there” so-to-speak, thereby paving the way for Mrs. Clinton to possibly be legally and officially named the US President upon subsequent appeal.

SHHHHuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuZZZZZZZZaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaMMMM ! ! !

[LOL – in the spirit of the American TV Show “Green Acres”]

This rumor has a great deal of credibility. Why? Because Stein, from an election standpoint, has absolutely nothing (repeat) nothing to gain from any recount anywhere WHAT-so-EVER!

Always remember to ask:

Who Benefits?

The only beneficiary, with respect to a vote recount, is Hillary Clinton. This is obviously a case of Jewish “you scratch my back, I’ll scratch yours.”

Thus far (11/25/2016), Hillary Clinton has gained, through proxy, a recount of the following three very important states:

1. Michigan

2. Wisconsin

3. Pennsylvania

Official Presidential Vote Recount for the State of Wisconsin:

http://elections.wi.gov/node/4432

Jill Stein supposedly raised enough money “all on her own” via website “donations” to pay for a recount in Wisconsin.

Enter the Jewish “Shell Game” . . . . .

Many of you are probably unaware of the above, or the backstage stuff at least.

Most of you however, have heard plenty (from the JMSM) about Colorado this and Colorado that.

Likewise, you’ve been hearing also a lot about Washington State this and Washington State that.

[Note: the state of Washington (WA) is not the same as the US capital “The District of Columbia” aka “Washington DC” over on the East Coast beside the Atlantic Ocean]

So what’s the deal with Colorado and Washington State?

Shell Game – Magic – Jewish Kaballah – That’s the Deal.

Let me explain . . .

First off, you’ve got to understand just what and who the Electoral College is…

Electoral College

The Constitution for the united States of America provides that the President shall be elected by a body of presidential electors chosen by all the states. This body is the Electoral College.

Every state has as many votes in the Electoral College as the total of its Senators and Representatives in Congress. Amendment 23 to the US Constitution, ratified in in 1961, gave the District of Columbia [Washington DC] three electoral votes (but don’t pay that any attention here or get that “territory” confused with Washington State located over on the West Coast up against the Pacific Ocean- it’s a point that needs to be made, but don’t let it serve as a spot of confusion- since we will be dealing with Washington State later on here) .

State committees or conventions of each political party usually select the candidates for potential Presidential Electors. In some states, the ballots list the presidential and vice-presidential candidates, but do not list the proposed electors. For this reason, many voters (the man on the street) have never actually realized that they do not actually vote directly for the President and Vice-President. Instead, they vote “indirectly.” In the election, the candidate who wins a plurality (the highest number) of a state’s “popular votes” usually receives all the state’s “electoral votes.” Thus, a candidate may be elected without a majority of “popular votes.”

Remember…

Majority = More than half (50%) of a given number of votes.

Say it’s a tiny USA, and 100 people Voted for President in one of the 50 tiny states…

Example 1:

1. Steve 80 Votes (won 80% of the total votes cast)

2. Jason 10 Votes (won 10% of the total votes cast)

3. Bobby 5 Votes (won 5% of the total votes cast)

4. James 5 Votes (won 5% of the total votes cast)

Steve won the plurality (highest number of votes) and also the Majority- because 80% of the votes is well over half (50%) of the total votes that were cast. Steve was a really popular guy! Steve received all this state’s electoral votes.

Example 2:

1. Steve 40 Votes (won 40% of the total votes cast)

2. Jason 30 Votes (won 30% of the total votes cast)

3. Bobby 26 Votes (won 26% of the total votes cast)

4. James 4 Votes (won 4% of the total votes cast)

Steve won the plurality (highest number of votes) however failed to win the Majority- because 40% of the votes is under half (50%) of the total votes that were cast. There was no real popular “stand-out” winner like up in Example1. Steve received all this state’s electoral votes. Hence, this was a perfect example where a somewhat “lackluster” candidate may still be elected- even without having ever received a majority of the “popular votes” within the state.

But wait, there’s more ! . . . . .

In the December following the presidential election (coming up), on a day set by law, the aforementioned duly elected presidential electors in each state (and the District of Columbia etc) assemble. State electors usually meet in their respective state’s capital. The electors then cast their ballots for President and Vice-President. Either by custom, or in a few states, by law (Hence in those particular states- News Agencies can sometimes go ahead and “call it” on Election Night in November without waiting til later in December), electors vote for their party’s choices for the two offices. The lists of these (December) elections are physically sent under protected seal to the president of the United States Senate and to the Administrator of General Services in Washington, D.C. In January (2017), at a joint session in the House of Representatives, the president of the Senate opens the certificates. Then four tellers, one Democrat and one Republican from each house (House of Representatives and Senate), count the votes in the presence of both houses of Congress. The candidate who receives a majority of the electoral votes for President is declared the elected. If no candidate has a majority, the state delegations in the House of Representatives choose the President from the three candidates having the highest number of of electoral votes. Each state has only one vote in such an election. If no candidate wins a majority of the electoral votes for Vice-President, the Senate elects the Vice-President from the two candidates with the highest number of electoral votes.

Reasons for the Electoral College

The manner of electing the President was a major problem at the Constitutional Convention of 1787. The convention rejected the proposal that the chief executive (President) be elected by Congress, on the grounds that he would then be under the control of the Legislature. The proposal that the people elect the President was also rejected- and at that time in history, perhaps rightly so.

To solve this problem, the Constitutional Convention agreed on the method of indirect popular election which became the Electoral College. The Fathers of the Constitution hoped this procedure would promote calm deliberation and selection of the best-qualified man.

Now back to present matters, being churned up everywhere by the Jewish-controlled Main Stream Media (JMSM) in regards to the states of Colorado and Washington State . . . . .

The MSM keeps making a big deal about Electors in certain states that told/ensured the media (on November 8th – the popular election day/night) that they were going to vote for candidate X come December, as explained above- going back upon their word, and turning, or “flipping” their December electoral vote over to candidate Y instead! So instead of the Elector voting for Candidate X as promised to the media on popular “Election Night” (11/8/2016), they are now allegedly (per a lying scheming Jewish media) telling the media that they have essentially changed their minds- in some cases a legal impossibility, that they are instead voting for Candidate Y! How absurd!

For example, the (((media))) is now claiming the following…

That 6 Colorado Electors have decided to “flip” their votes away from Clinton, as originally claimed, and plan to instead vote for Trump. That claim is of course absurd. Why? Because in the state of Colorado an elector cannot do that- he has no choice– period. In a Presidential election held in the state of Colorado- Colorado state law confirms that a candidate that wins a plurality (the highest number) of the state’s “popular votes” receives ALL of the state’s “electoral votes.” So in the case of Colorado, Clinton won the highest number of votes in the popular election- therefore Clinton receives ALL of Colorado’s “electoral votes”- it doesn’t matter what 6 of the individual electors have to say! LOL The media is betting on Coloradins’ and Americans’ ignorance of their own election laws and procedures!

6 Colorado electors threatening to instead vote for Trump in December- against what they had promised on November 8th is ridiculous! It is meaningless, and doesn’t help Trump at all, because the popular vote in CO [which went to Clinton] automatically becomes the actual vote cast for each elector there- the JMSM is running a “shell game”- playing upon the ignorance of the public. See next for more details on that…

The (((media))) is also now claiming that…

Another Colorado Elector, a Jew named Michael Baca, may also “flip his vote”- however he intends to flip his particular vote away from Trump (as originally promised on Nov 8th) and cast it over to Clinton in December. Again, rubbish. He could not vote for Trump even if he wanted to, because he is an Elector in the state of Colorado, one of many states where the state’s popular vote BECOMES essentially that state’s electoral votes! In other words, in those particular states, no matter who the “Electors” each votes for, the Will of the People prevails- by state law! Thus, since the majority of the popular vote in Colorado went for Clinton, it doesn’t matter if ALL of the Electors in Colorado went against the majority of the voters, and voted for Trump- their own personal favorite, ALL electoral votes from the State of Colorado would go to Clinton- not Trump. Those states just keep the Electoral College around for legal reasons, the popular vote IS all of the electoral votes in those particular states where the state legislature decided to do it that way over time. Trump never had one single electoral vote in Colorado state- no matter what the electors originally promised to vote for, or may “flip” over to- because the majority of the public voted for Clinton, therefore ALL electoral votes in that state are to automatically be cast for Clinton. Thus, Trump cannot lose what he never had to begin with- it’s a MSM “shell game”- apparently priming the ignorant/unsuspecting American public for something real sinister somewhere down the pipeline.

What the (((media))) is now claiming about Washington State…

A Washington State Elector, Bret Chiafalo, has allegedly “flipped his vote” (in his mind, mind you) away from Clinton over to Trump- but once again, such statements are meaningless- because Washington is one of the states that automatically (no matter how much each “human” elector balks), casts the popular vote winner as the candidate that each elector voted for- it’s meaningless what the human elector does- the process is ensured to always operate that way- it’s protected by law. The elector in December cannot over-ride the majority vote winner (from November 8th) of the people in those states set up that way. It is illegal for human electors in such states to “go rogue” in December and vote against the way of the popular majority back in November- should they try to do so anyway- it’s considered by law to be invalid, and the elector can be punished- just for being a “pain in the rump,” as he did not harm anyone- he has no “true voting power” (recognized by law) in those states. Again, Trump never had one single electoral vote in this state- no matter what the electors originally claimed who they were going to vote for in December, or may “flip” over to- because, once again, the majority of the public in Washington voted for Clinton, therefore ALL electoral votes in that state are to automatically be cast for Clinton. So Trump can’t lose what he never had to begin with. Shell game.

So what else is the Jew-controlled media, Green Party Jewess Jill Stein, and crypto-Jewess Hillary Clinton up to, besides a little “Never Let em’ Know Where They Stand” terror/destabilization here and there? Let’s try to follow the shell . . .

Normally the margins would be too large to allow for a recount, but the ploy is that TRUMP “hacked” the Electronic Voting machines (which technically is impossible), but regardless [go figure], they are investigating an alleged “hack” anyway. LOL

With Jew (((George Soros))) [real name: György Schwartz] in control of the machines, a “hack” WILL MOST LIKELY INDEED be found, and then authentic Americans could find themselves to be in HUGE trouble! Massive fallout/destabilization, Martial Law declared, FEMA, a Rabbi Alex Jone$tein “The Works” type of fiasco. You get the drift.

Let’s go take a look at Stein’s “Federal Reserve Note Machine” . . .

Jill Stein’s Election Recount “Phony Fundraiser” Page:

https://jillstein.nationbuilder.com/recount

It has been stated that (((Jill Stein))) supposedly raised enough money to fund a recount (attempting to steal the election away from Trump via a “recount”) in only 5 hours!

One observer allegedly reported:

Go to Jill Stein’s fundraiser page and watch the progress. You will see that her funding is coming in at a PERFECTLY CONSISTENT [$]160,000 an hour. I watched this yesterday and last night carefully, and noted that at night, when everyone [in the USA] is sleeping and right through the time when the whole world slows down, her donations for this [recount project] came in like clockwork [steadily and consistently without any derivation], with no deviation from the steady pace whatsoever.

The only way that [type of steady, non-stop flow] can happen is if a [computer Ro]bot was set up to fake her getting donations from multiple [real] people [as if in fact they were all authentic], and whoever set it up [programmed the page or WebBot] did not consider the fact that practically everything [as far as any donations would be concerned] would [be] come[ing] from America, and practically everyone [that could possibly be donating in America] is [usually] asleep at 3AM [in the morning]. LAST NIGHT IT [THE DONATIONS] SHOULD HAVE SLOWED DOWN. IT [THE ONLINE DONATIONS] DID NOT. IT JUST MARCHED RIGHT TOWARD THE FINISH LIKE AN OBEDIENT SOLDIER. It went straight to 2.65 million [US Dollars] by six AM [in the morning in the USA]. I can calculate: IT WILL GO TO 4.5 MILLION IN 28.125 HOURS. Oh, a few people will pitch in [actually donate] for real, so I’ll say 27 hours.

EASY MATH. JILL STEIN WILL GET THE [$]4.5 MILLION [Dollars] SHE NEEDS BETWEEN 4 AND SIX PM TONIGHT, DEPENDING UPON HOW MUCH REAL PEOPLE PITCH IN [in addition to the computer code dropping amounts in from who even knows where]. Actual math progression based on the steady rate lands squarely on 6:10 PM tonight, but I am guessing a few real people will pay in.

Don’t be fooled by the slick language on the [website’s] donation page, if those donations did not virtually stop at night [as would be normal, then] they are not coming [in] from the American people.

Yes folks, we are watching an attempted election steal occurring within the USA as it happens. It apparently could not be pulled off realistically by threatening electors, so now we have this. And it is all based on false claims, because Michigan CANNOT BE HACKED.

Michigan has a CERTIFIED VOTE. There is NO WAY THIS IS LEGIT. And that means ONE THING – there are liars doing it, powerful mostly-Jewish TRILLIONAIRE liars who know in advance that they are going to “find” what they have been searching for.

Michigan had all paper ballots and cannot be hacked. But that won’t stop liars of the caliber we are up against. Michigan has a different vote counting process than other states. First, Michigan does a quick count. Then, automatically, they do a certified count. That count was certified today. It is an un-hackable process. If Hillary takes Michigan when Michigan can’t be hacked, and the vote is certified, it will prove fraud of the highest order.

BULLYING ELECTORS WITH DEATH THREATS DID NOT WORK, SO NOW THEY ARE GOING TO FORCE A RECOUNT ONLY IN STATES [THAT] TRUMP WON.

Trump may have taken Michigan, but that will not make a difference. Jewess Jill Stein demanded a recount, and the election WILL be rigged. They have had ALL THE TIME they need to fill out a whole bunch of blank ballots and throw the election to Clinton. No one was watching. It happened, GAME OVER. All 3 states, Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania will most likely be thrown to Hillary.

So that is how it was planned to be “stolen” all along, since election day at least. And Hillary get’s to skate home free, saying “Hey, I wasn’t the one that asked for it.”

Every last request (((Jill Stein))) has will most likely be granted, and every last request Trump asks for will most likely be denied. There may be nothing that can be done to stop it, because they would not have planned this unless they knew for certain they had it in the bag.

Bringing newcomers here up to speed…

They had a bunch of fake computer consultants state that there were voting anomalies in favor of Trump, and that they proved Russia rigged the vote. On those grounds, Green Party candidate (((Jill Stein))) called for a recount, and was handed all the money she needed to do it (practically out of nowhere) in a single day. In the background, leading up to this, (obviously) they wrote in a huge number of fake ballots for Clinton. The recount will “magically” discover all those “new” (but actually fake) votes for Clinton, and she’s going in. AT A BARE MINIMUM, SOMEONE OTHER THAN TRUMP WILL BE ELECTED. They would not be doing this unless they knew they had it in the bag.

They are saying the election was hacked, when Pennsylvania does not even have a way to hack it. They are BRAZENLY lying about EVERYTHING. The Jewish Main Stream Media (MSM) is backing them up, and Jewish-controlled (((Google))) is destroying dissent. And ALL the comment sections are suddenly “open for business” for a change- as in no longer on “Total Lock Down” as before- like during and right after the election, with 100 percent Jewish/Hasbara trollage in favor of it, (or when real opinion is allowed to post through as a comment, they have trolls waiting in lay to have it perfectly answered, via pre-written scripts, to have the legit commenter’s comment bashed into the ground- then ban the commenter from being able to reply).

This is such a brazen steal they would not even think of doing it unless they KNEW FOR SURE they have it in the bag.

Eye Roll [Looking Way Down the Roller Coaster] – Buckle Up – Oh Here We Go . . .

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/11/22/clinton-campaign-looking-into-challenging-outcome-of-election-to-undermine-the-vote

S – L – A – V – E ! ! ! YOUUUUUU GOOOOOOOONNNNNNIEEEEEEEEE ! ! !

[ Wide Open Roller Coaster Yell ]

 

Why Israel is Burning? by Gilad Atzmon

Why Israel is Burning?

By Gilad Atzmon
1480033316706

Israel’s rural landscape is saturated with pine trees. These trees are new to the region.  The pine trees were introduced to the Palestinians landscape in the early 1930s by the Jewish National Fund (JNF) in an attempt to ‘reclaim the land’ . By 1935, JNF had planted 1.7 million trees over a total area of 1,750 acres. Over fifty years, the JNF planted over 260 million trees largely on confiscated Palestinian land. It did it all in a desperate attempt to hide the ruins of the ethnically cleansed Palestinian villages and their history.

Along the years the JNF performed a crude attempt to eliminate Palestinian civilisation and past  but it also tried to make Palestine look like Europe. The Palestinian natural forest was eradicated. Similarly the olive trees were uprooted. The pine trees took their place. On the southern part of mount Carmel the Israelis named an area as ‘Little Switzerland’. By now, there is no much left of “Little Switzerland.”

However, the facts on the ground were pretty devastating for the JNF. The pine tree didn’t adapt to the Israeli climate as much as the Israelis failed to adapt to the Middle East. According to JNF statistics, six out of every 10 saplings planted did not survive. Those few trees that did survive formed nothing but a firetrap. By the end of each Israeli summer each of the Israeli pine forests become a potential deadly zone.

In spite of its nuclear ability, its criminal army, the occupation, the Mossad and its lobbies all over the world, Israel seems to be  vulnerable. It is devastatingly alienated from the land it claims to own and care for. Like the pine tree, Zionism, Israel and the Israeli are foreign to the region.

Published originally under the title  The Burning Bush on December 2,  2010, http://www.gilad.co.uk/writings/gilad-atzmon-the-burning-bush.html

Subhuman nature : The acute degradation of the American mind by John Kaminski

kaminskihdr

Subhuman nature : The acute degradation of the American mind

Any trace of morality in an American leader has always been remedied by assassination.

By John Kaminski
pseudoskylax@gmail.com
http://therebel.is/news/kaminski

The world rattles on while Israel’s proxy army known as the U.S. military murders dozens of people every day in places so far away they are beyond the comprehension of the average working American who consumes his time with inconsequential personal enrichment schemes that often involve quasi criminal techniques which often ruin the lives of others.

Third World nations are falling like dominoes to the neocon monstrosity, which devours its own citizens almost as fast as it obliterates distant countries. Any resemblance to the “domino theory” about Communism during the brutal reign of the Soviet Union is not purely coincidental.

It has become so easy and profitable to wreck other countries who won’t sign onto the Jewish world financial agenda. From there, it was only one small step for the American military to refocus its malicious intent upon its own people, with the ultimate goal of controlling every single person on the planet, Americans first.

Some would say — through propagandized schools, media and entertainment — this has already happened.

How else can we explain the sullen succession of presidential clones all regurgitating the same schizophrenic message — it’s OK to trust the bankers even though we know they’re stealing from us.

The clamoring of Bernie Sanders’ cult worshippers about the election of Donald Trump has that same kind of passionate ignorance that young devotees of communism evince on college campuses, without ever having learned that Soviet communism slaughtered one hundred million NON JEWISH humans in its nightmare pursuit of a Jewish heaven on earth feeding upon the corpse of Russia.

stalin

Throughout the world and from behind the scenes the Jews have trampled upon the world with a vengeance beyond all rationality.

Today the same maggots have eaten away at the innards of the United States. They have captured the minds of all Americans by their insidious monopolization of media, made possible by their unrestricted control of the money supply. And they have taught us that it was very stylish to be unreflective and self-destructive robots.

The Jewish spawned Frankfort School of so-called psychologists taught many generations of American children to hate their own families for their oppressive beliefs. These beliefs were the psychological glue that held nations together.

There was never a republic on the American continent. The banks always determined the chains that bound us, simply by buying politicians and owning all the newspapers. It was always about what the banks permitted. Nothing has really changed.

The degradation of the America mind is so acute for the past hundred years people have failed to see that what has been promoted by the mass media has been largely false, deliberately designed by and for the financial moguls who owned the newspapers rather than for the people who read them.

The public conformed to what the authorities said to do, and as has been the case throughout history, the authorities were utterly corrupt.

• • •

All men are not created equal . . .

The fact that Abraham Lincoln said they were in his canonized Gettysburg Address was perhaps the first step in the overthrow of the American republic.

The forced equality of inferior minds has damaged the American educational mission beyond repair. Once it was a tool for enlightenment; now it has become a choice of what military support mechanism do you wish to pursue? Scientific research has become totally skewed in pursuit of weapons applications despite the visible risks and the questionable rewards that almost always complicates stealing from others.

informed

Any trace of morality in an American leader has always been remedied by assassination.

Christianity had gained its ascendance over the minds of humanity in much the same way, by promising deliverance from pain and forgiveness for past crimes, and undermining the formula of the Roman Empire in which every citizen was a soldier.

Yet as the centuries passed, the majority of the army became composed of people from other countries whose allegiance was to leaders who promised them fortunes rather than to the community they had pledged to defend.

Similar story today. Perhaps the story of civilization.

Hell, if they can get away with 9/11, they can get away with anything, put anything over on a nation of dummies, of intellectually challenged individuals who are the products of the totally misguided American school system and then brainwashed throughout their lives by uninterrupted doses of artificial reality, where the world is kept in constant fear by a government so desperate to prove it is needed to protect us that it invents its own terror threats.

The government’s philosophy is to put us in jail to protect us — so we will never present a danger to its hegemony. That’s why they’re flooding white countries with nonwhite immigrants, to force prison conditions on the chaos that is inevitably resulting.

Just another classic strategy by the alleged humans who invented the Jewish destabilization template, which is guaranteed to destroy every country it infects with its homicidal mania and unquenchable penchant for swindling.

What kind of demented bureaucrats would slaughter 3,000 of their own countrymen simply for geopolitical objectives, and the fabulous profits of worldwide commerce in drugs, oil and weapons. We know who most of these people are? We allow them to walk among us unmolested.

Could these people all have had bad parents? These things make you wonder about how civilized is the civilized world? Do we need to be restrained? Can we ever be allowed to be free?

When Trump’s righthand mad marine spews from the podium about American exceptionalism I think it means anyone can be killed for any reason simply by declaring them a potential terrorist for disobeying the pronouncements of an utterly corrupt government.

Like so many other things, it makes me shiver.

The sheer ugliness of American behavior in the world in recent years has confounded many American patriots who realize they have been supporting criminal garbage who continually betray their own people for profit, no matter how immense the carnage or how indefensible their lies.

Consider recent American history ignored by Jewish mainstream media:

• Gassings of 200 Syrian children and then displaying them in a gym for photos, blamed on Assad but carried out by U.S. supported jihadis, a classic example of the media working hand in hand with the military, both driven by demonic politicians intent on destroying Syria for Israel, all for a stupid oil pipeline.

• Murdering two million defeated and defenseless German soldiers in a field in France — the Rhine Meadows massacre — never reported by mainstream press. Perhaps the No. 1 source of twisted Jewish glee ever produced.

• Buying the Ukrainian revolution for $5 billion and hiring mercenaries to shoot people from both sides in order to stimulate a phony revolution that immediately began slaughtering Russians who didn’t go along with the plan.

(Face it! Obama has been trying to start World War III at the behest of his Jewish paymasters.)

• Assassinating doctors for curing cancer that the pharmaceutical industry does not want cured.

rcobb2-copy

• Giving smallpox blankets to Indians who taught the Pilgrims to avoid starvation by planting corn. Get it? The Indians saved the Pilgrims, and the Pilgrims murdered them.

Could this have been the template all American behavior that followed? The list of these stupendous moral infractions is, as you know, endless.

Except we must take note of the current pedophilia revelations now being unearthed involving the highest levels of Washington society that have persisted for decades. This would be the most jarring example of the subhuman nature that now infects every maneuver by a clearly perverted Obama administration, but also Washington society in general. War mad perverts, you might say.

If the objective of seeking power is to rape and murder children, we must ask ourselves what is the purpose of our lives.

The Jews want to turn the United States into Africa or South America because it would make everybody easier to manage. Peasants are easier to manage than financiers.

The younger generations are lured away from their parents by trends designed to addict them to damaging pastimes and derail any ideas they might have had about how the world is really run.

You can control their educations so they can only rise to a certain level, far below the level needed to perceive the scams that limit our freedom and damage our health.

Throughout the 20th century, Americans have been unable to perceive the swindles perpetrated on them by the Jewish bankers and their hired politicians.

562825_10150747094363450_507338449_9690252_905289856_n

Generations have been bamboozled by the Jewish press, which explains away the financial crimes and enflames the population to go and kill some designated enemy for some totally fallacious reason.

Will we ever have a leader who can be candid?

Or will we keep on prattling until we kill each other off?

If Donald Trump has come to give us the peace of the Jews we’re no better off than we were before.

Remember the subhuman drecks who attached wires to people’s genitals in Abu Ghraib prison . . . those orders came right from the top.

We can no longer believe our government when it says it has identified an enemy.

It cannot tell the difference between an enemy and a potential victim of crime.

What it calls an enemy is all too often the next victim of its outrageous crime.

The criminals who are our bankers, presidents, generals and editors can justify anything that makes them richer.

And it so happens that is exactly the behavior that makes the world inestimably poorer.

Change this system or watch the world go up in flames. Some say it’s too late, and the final fire season is already here.

This is our subhuman nature. Most people don’t realize any of this. And worst of all, don’t care who we kill.

This may be how the world DOES work, but I think we, as intelligent humans, can all agree it’s not how the world SHOULD work.

And we should never stop working to make the world the way we want it. Enough of this Jewish slave colony.

John Kaminski is a writer who lives on the Gulf Coast of Florida, constantly trying to figure out why we are destroying ourselves, and pinpointing a corrupt belief system as the engine of our demise. Solely dependent on contributions from readers, please support his work by mail: 6871 Willow Creek Circle #103, North Port FL 34287 USA.
http://therebel.is/news/kaminski
http://johnkaminski.info/
http://www.rudemacedon.ca/kaminski/kam-index.html
http://www.serendipity.li/john_kaminski_articles.htm
http://web.archive.org/web/20040323232319/http://johnkaminski.com/

 

Police Raid, My Confession Latest Video by Alfred Schaefer

alfredconfessionhdr

Dear friends,

Here is a video that is designed to help understand the process that is being used against us by the parasite, to subdue us, leading to our own intended extermination. I believe that understanding how the parasite does this to us, gives us much better odds for containing it, and reflecting the “hate and fear” back to its source. It is 35 minutes long.

Alfred Schaefer

Why Trump won By Brother Nathanael

http://www.realjewnews.com/?p=1166

screen-shot-2016-11-21-at-2-47-20-am

Why Trump Won
By Brother Nathanael Kapner 

November 20, 2016 ©
___________________________________

DEAR DIARY, many are musing on why Trump won. But first we need to see why Clinton lost.

Some say it’s because she did not stress what she would do rather than slamming what Trump would trash, while others say it’s because millions of Democrats did not vote.

That’s owing to Hillary’s inability to inspire, even her own coterie.

And her projection of “it’s my turn” soured voters against “presumptive succession” that would have ushered in more wars and the utter wreckage of society’s mores.

Besides this, the Democratic party, once seen as the champion of the working man, was viewed as the party of the elites, no less than the ilk of George Soros and Goldman Sachs.

But why did Trump win?

The neocon Jews say that Trump sparked a “white nationalist uprising” which they fear.

And Democrats remark that by Comey re-opening the FBI investigation into Hillary’s emails, Trump was able to edge her out.

That’s a blame game.

But Jewry’s fear of whites comes closer to explaining the triumph of Trump.

screen-shot-2016-11-21-at-2-47-57-am

GENTILES CANNOT GRASP why Jews abuse white supremacy.

I have to laugh, since growing up in Judaism, I know that Jewry’s rag on “white supremacy” has more to do with “white power” than with “white racism.”

Jews are the real racists since they prefer white neighborhoods—even sued to live there—and consider it a disgrace to live in a mixed neighborhood of blacks and whites, an indication of failure in the world of business of which Jews are expected to excel.

Behind closed doors Jews call blacks “schwartzas” and “shooks.”

And while living among whites, Jews call them “goys.” If a Jew says something stupid while in Jewish company he’s ridiculed as having a “goyishe kup,” that is, a “Gentile head.”

But getting to my point, Jews fear white predominance, especially if it’s marked with a Christian worldview, for thereby Jews are looked upon as “Christ-killers.”

Jews cringe during Easter when Passion Plays are performed and movies of Christ’s crucifixion are aired on TV. Jews shudder when hearing the Pharisees cry out, “Crucify Him!”

That’s a bona fide blame game with history backing it.

And that’s the main reason Jews usurped Easter with Holocaust Remembrance Month.

screen-shot-2016-11-21-at-2-48-13-am
WHAT DOES all this have to do with why Trump won? Everything.

Trump won because marginalized whites felt spurned by the ruling class (Jews…though most whites, at least for now, cannot bring this to consciousness) and rose up at the call of Trump to recover what they lost…their jobs.

The Jews reacted by calling his supporters “high school grads” and “thugs,” then applauded Clinton for calling them “deplorables.”

The Jewish-owned media chimed in with bogus polls showing Hillary ahead so as to demoralize Trump supporters with a feeling of defeat and forego the ballot box.

Didn’t work. The more the media exalted Clinton the more the whites boosted Trump.

Some call it “blowback” but I call it “defiance.”

And so, dear diary, I know why Trump won. Jews do to, and tremble before white revolt.

It could turn on their heads in a repeat of Jewish history.

Jews cry “victim” but the goys crave the last word.

Regina v Radical Press Legal Update # 25 by Arthur Topham

screen-shot-2016-11-16-at-9-00-06-am

screen-shot-2016-11-16-at-9-01-29-am

screen-shot-2016-11-16-at-9-02-04-am

Dear Free Speech Defenders and Radical Press Supporters,First, allow me to extend my sincere apologies to all of those who have been waiting so long for this legal update. It has been delayed for over a year now primarily due to the snail’s pace at which the R v Roy Arthur Topham Charter challenge has been crawling through the BC Supreme Court legal system. Delay after delay meant postponement of an overview that might provide a useful picture of all the salient events. As a result coverage of all that’s gone down demands a somewhat lengthy update.

To recap the issue for readers – Constitutional notice was first served to the Crown on March 23rd, 2015 and and the process, such as it was, did not conclude until November 8th and 9th, 2016 in Victoria, B.C. where the final two days of argument took place. That amounts to a little over 19 months this aspect of the case has been ongoing.

From the onset it was Crown’s position that they wanted the Constitutional Charter challenge put off until after the end of the trial. Following the pre-trial hearing on the matter that began in Vancouver, BC’s SC on June 22nd, 2015 – in his Reasons for Judgment handed down July 8, 2015 – SC Justice Butler, citing case law, ruled that it would be better to hold off on the Charter argument until after the trial so as to not “fragment” the criminal proceedings. He also decided that in the case of constitutional challenges it’s better to wait until after the trial to adjudicate such issues because by then a “factual foundation” would be in place.

Arthur and the Three Hookers
As well, prior to Justice Butler’s decision of July 8th, during a June 10th, 2015 appearance, he ruled that in order for the Constitutional Charter challenge to proceed it would first be necessary for the Defence to provide sound reasons which would satisfy the Justice the “Bedford Test” had been met in order for the proceedings to move to the stage where the actual challenge to the legislation would take place.

In a nutshell the Bedford “Test” or “Threshold”, as it’s often called, is a decision of the Supreme Court of Canada in Canada (Attorney General) v Bedford handed down on December 20, 2013, wherein the Supreme Court ruled that some of Canada’s prostitution laws were unconstitutional. Bedford was the surname of one of the three prostitutes who challenged the legislation.

One of the principal issues that the S.C. of Canada deliberated in that case was whether a trial judge could consider Charter arguments not raised in a previous case about the same law. Legal tradition has always held that a lower court (in my case the BC S.C.) is ‘bound’ by decisions made by the SC of Canada. It’s this particular principle and precedent (in Latin called stare decisis) which Crown has been arguing over-rides my arguments as presented in my Memorandum of Argument Regarding the Threshold Issue where I state that the decision in Keegstra is no longer binding upon my case due to similarities with the Bedford case where the Supreme Court of Canada found that lower courts may revisit binding authorities from higher courts in cases where new legal issues are raised, or where a change in the evidence or circumstances fundamentally shifts the parameters of the debate.

As a result of Justice Butler’s ruling my challenge was therefore postponed until the trial was completed. The trial ran from October 26, 2015 to November 12, 2015 (a period of 14 days) and when it concluded I was found guilty on Count 1 of the charge of “willfully promoting hatred against an identifiable group, contrary to s. 319(2) of the Criminal Code”. At the same time the jury also acquitted me on Count 2 which was the same identical charge.***

Fixing a date with the Queen of England no easy task
After the trial ended I appeared again in Quesnel SC on December 7th, 2015 to “fix a date” for the Charter hearing to take place. During this appearance Rodney G. Garson, a special Crown Prosecutor out of the Prosecution Support Unit within the Crown Law Division of the Ministry of Justice filed a requisition with the court to appear on behalf of the Crown to argue the Charter matter.

It was also then that a new date of January 25th, 2016 was set to fix another date to argue the question of who it was, Crown or Defence, that bears the onus of having to prove that Sec. 2(b) of the Charter is infringed upon by s. 319(2) of the Criminal Code of Canada and is therefore open to challenge, regardless of the former landmark Keegstra decision.

The January 25th, 2016 appearance came and went. During court my legal counsel Barclay Johnson informed the Justice and Crown that the Defence would be calling Expert Witnesses to testify during the Charter hearing. In that instance Dr. Michael Persinger’s name was given to the court. Once again we didn’t get to “fixing a date” and the issue was put over to March 29th, 2016.

On March 29th, 2016 we met again to “fix a date” but, alas, it didn’t happen. My counsel, Barclay Johnson did notify the court at that time that we would also be calling Dr. Timothy Jay as an Expert Witness. He also brought up the issue of the double verdicts, i.e. one Guilty count and one Not Guilty count for the same identical charge. A new date was set for April 4th, 2016 to “fix a date” for the Charter hearing.

Like all the others dates April 4th, 2016 came and went and still no date was fixed. A new date of May 2nd, 2016 was set.

On May 2nd, 2016 I again attended court. Murphy’s Law still being in effect this time there were computer problems in the court room and so Quesnel Crown counsel Jennifer Johnston appeared on behalf of Crown Prosecutor Rodney Garson and a new date of June 6th, 2016 was set to “fix a date” for the Charter hearing.

On June 6th, 2016 the “fix a date” phenomenon was getting so bad that my own counsel’s computer went on the blink and we had to set another date! This time it was for July 11th, 2016.

When July 11th, 2016 rolled around and a miracle occurred. We finally were able to “fix a date” for the commencement of the Charter hearing. The week of October 3rd, 2016 to October 7th, 2016 was SET! During this time Crown chose the date of October 31st, 2016 for “sentencing” in the event that I lost my Charter argument.

The Hearing (Part 1)
One day prior to the commencement of the hearing on October 3rd I was informed by my legal counsel that the scheduled week would not see the completion of the Charter argument. Crown Prosecutor Rodney Garson informed the court that he would require additional time in order to cross-examine the two Expert Witnesses that Defence was planning to call and he didn’t feel there would be enough time to also argue the issue of the Bedford Threshold.

Along with Dr. Persinger and Dr. Jay there was a third witness present in court on October 3rd. Jeremy Maddock, who was my former lawyer Doug Christie’s legal assistant and is currently assisting my counsel Barclay Johnson, appeared in order to testify to the various websites online where the materials that were posted on RadicalPress.com could also be found. This was one of our principal arguments – that all of the online books that I have posted on my website are also readily available on numerous other websites around the world as well as being openly sold on major book-selling sites like Amazon.com and Amazon.ca. Jeremy Maddock presented to the court 22 screenshots of other websites that he had researched which clearly showed that the impugned books and articles were freely available elsewhere on the net.

In cross-examination Crown Prosecutor Garson attempted to dismiss the screen shots of the various websites that Mr. Maddock presented suggesting that they weren’t reliable and also that the numbers shown in the Google searches were also irrelevant. Defence lawyer Barclay Johnson responded by referring to the hundreds of pages of screen shots that Crown had introduced into evidence during the trial and suggesting that if they weren’t relevant then Crown should not have presented them to the jury. Justice Butler, having sat through the trial, was well aware of this fact and didn’t buy into Crown’s argument and accepted Maddock’s testimony as both relevant and admissible.

The Defence’s first Expert Witness was Dr. Timothy Jay. (It should be noted here, prior to discussing Dr. Jay’s testimony, that throughout the trial Crown consistently made reference to my satire Israel Must Perish! , an article created by me in order to show the glaring hypocrisy of Jewish lobbyists like B’nai Brith Canada – one of the two complainants who had filed the Sec. 319(2) charge against me and my website – who were accusing me of spreading “hate” when one of their own kind, Theodore N. Kaufman, had unquestionably written one of the most vile, hate-filled books titled Germany Must Perish! back in 1941 that basically called for the absolute genocide of the German nation and all of its people.)

Dr. Jay, a full professor with the Massachusetts College of Liberal Arts, is considered to be an expert in the field of cognitive and linguistic psychology and has extensive experience interpreting allegedly obscene speech in the context of U.S. radio and television regulation. He’s also written numerous books and articles dealing with the issue of controversial language and for purposes of the Charter hearing had written a paper in my defence called “Opinion Regarding Arthur Topham’s Israel Must Perish” the gist of which was:

“It is my opinion as a cognitive psychologist that a satirical reading of Israel Must Perish! by an average adult reader would not result in the satire being considered hate speech. There are several mitigating factors which must be taken into account regarding how people read and comprehend literature, for example, what frame of mind the reader brings to the literature, what the reader thinks the literature is “about” or “means”, what impact a satirical reading might have on a reader, and what a reader would ultimately remember about the literature. I also consider the context in which the reader encounters the literature.”

My legal counsel Barclay Johnson presented Dr. Jay’s curriculum vitae [a fancy Latin term for a resume. A.T.] to the court and Dr. Jay appeared via telephone to answer any questions that the Defence or Crown or Justice Butler might have.

From the onset Crown Prosecutor Rodney Garson was quick to respond to Defence’s introduction of Dr. Jay and began citing a number of case law examples regarding “expert opinion” in order to challenge Dr. Jay’s qualifications. He went on about how an expert witness should be “impartial”, “independent”, “unbiased”, “fair”, “objective” and “non-partisan”, all the while overlooking the fact that during the trial itself the Crown’s own “Expert Witness”, former Canadian Jewish Congress CEO Len Rudner, had outright proven to the court that he was anything but impartial and independent and unbiased and objective and, to top it all off, had unabashedly committed perjury during his testimony, a fact which SC Justice Butler was made aware of but chose to ignore. Garson of course wasn’t present during the trial but given these facts all his feigned and overtly aggressive protestations against Dr. Jay’s credentials and his ability to offer expert opinion appeared rather disingenuous, especially when he exclaimed to the court that he had a “realistic concern” about Dr. Jay’s qualifications.

The thrust of the Crown’s argument was that Dr. Jay’s opinions on my satire Israel Must Perish! was biased and would “undermine” the decision of the jury and “the administration of justice” and put SC Justice Butler in an “invidious” position. Going further, Crown Prosecutor Garson told the court that the jurors’ decision cannot be questioned or “further evidence” be added by an expert witness. It was clearly evident that the Crown didn’t want any expert opinion on my satire to be considered or even an acknowledgment that it was a satire and not a “book” as the Crown consistently referred to it as during the trial.

On Tuesday, October 8th at 2 p.m. SC Justice Butler gave his oral decision regarding Dr. Timothy Jay’s qualifications and ruled that Dr. Jay’s evidence impinged upon the question of my guilt or innocence and was therefore a “collateral attack” on the jury’s “guilty” verdict and wasn’t permissible.

In a recent article published in the Friends of Freedom newsletter (A private newsletter for the supporters of the Canadian Free Speech League, dealing in cases of the censorship and persecution of political, religious, and historical opinion.) titled “Topham Embarks on Long-Awaited Challenge of Hate Speech Law” by Jeremy Maddock he has the following to say about Justice Butler’s decision to disallow Dr. Jay’s evidence:

“Justice Butler’s decision leaves the defence in a very difficult position. On one hand, the Supreme Court of Canada’s Whatcott decision provides that hate speech laws must be narrowly construed, and are only constitutional to the extent that they ‘prohibit expression that is likely to cause … discrimination and the other societal harms of hate speech.’

At trial, defence counsel was told in no uncertain terms that he was not permitted to call evidence on the constitutional question, which is an issue for the judge alone to decide, and cannot be put to the jury. By limiting the trial evidence in this way, then subsequently ruling that evidence about the effects of the impugned material is inadmissible on the constitutional application, the Court has made it exceedingly difficult for the defence to meet the test in Whatcott.”

A Bloody Disgrace
What ought to be of immediate concern to readers and especially supporters of this Charter hearing is the fact that I had worked hard to raise funds via my GoGetFunding site to hire Dr. Jay to write his report. It was an endeavour which cost the Defence $2,000.00 in US funds the money ultimately coming from numerous supporters around the world who donated their hard-earned cash to make it happen. Justice Butler’s decision to not allow Dr. Jay to testify meant all that money had been wasted yet in the case of Crown’s “Expert Witness” Len Rudner during trial, hardly a second thought was given to granting him the same official status. Then, on top of that, I recently received, via my legal counsel, another invoice from Dr. Jay requesting an additional $1,700.00 US funds for his time spent in court on the 3rd and 4th of October, an amount which still must be raised in order to fulfill Defence’s commitments. In total that amounts to $3,700.00 US which translates into $5,112.29 Canadian dollars all raised in vain. The matter is blithely brushed aside as being just a part of the process of doing the legal dance but from my perspective it’s nothing short of being a bloody disgrace and an insult to all who have given their financial support to this ongoing “hate speech” trial.

Dr. Persinger takes the stand Day 3 of the hearing began on Wednesday, October 5th with Defence counsel Barclay Johnson introducing our second Expert Witness Dr. Michael Persinger who also was able to appear via telephone.

Dr. Michael A. Persinger is a Full Professor in the Departments of Psychology and Biology Behavioural Neuroscience, Biomolecular Sciences and Human Studies Programs at Laurentian University in Sudbury, Ontario and his curriculum vitae is, like Dr. Jay’s, also long and distinguished.

Dr. Persinger had written a paper titled, The Anachronism of Policies and Laws for Hate Speech in Modern Canada: The Current Negative Cultural Impact of Legal Punishment upon Extreme Verbal Behaviour, the focus of which was a review of an earlier related document published back in 1966 titled Report to the Minister of Justice of theSpecial Committee on Hate Propaganda in Canada [Also referred to as the Cohen Committee Report. A.T.]. It was this paper which the Defence introduced as part of the reasons for having Dr. Persinger testify.

The report had been commissioned by The Honourable Lucien Cardin, Minister of Justice and Attorney-General of Canada in 1965 during the time when the Cohen Committee was laying the groundwork for the implementation of Canada’s current Hate Propaganda legislation. (Background information on that period is contained in an article I published on RadicalPress.com in March of 2014 titled, Bad Moon Rising: How the Jewish Lobbies Created Canada’s “Hate Propaganda” Laws).

As Dr. Persinger states in his paper, “Although the document (the Cohen Committee Report) was primarily a legal text, it contained a review of social psychological analysis of hate propaganda by Dr. Harry Kaufmann, an Associate Professor of Psychology at the University of Toronto. The mass of this literature was not empirical but based upon theories that are now almost fifty or more years old. There were almost no experimental data, not surprisingly because social psychology was in its infancy and neurocognitive psychology with the powerful tools of brain imaging, did not exist.”

Further, Dr. Persinger also stated that, “The policies upon which contemporary laws for hate propaganda and hate speech have been based in Canada appear to be primarily derived from” Dr. Harry Kaufmann’s Report to the Minister of Justice of theSpecial Committee on Hate Propaganda in Canada. He then goes on to say that, “Today’s environment is dominated by the Internet, the multiple variants of cell phone media, and the requirement for the average person to be more evaluative with respect to what is read and what is said within chat rooms, bulletin boards, and other electronic forms of information exchange. The world of Google and of search engines has shaped a generation with premature sagacity for challenge and resistance to gullibility that did not exist in the population of the 1950s and 1960s. Those individuals would have constituted the focus of concern at the time the document was published.”

One additional statement in Dr. Persinger’s paper claimed that “The assertion by the Cohen Committee that ‘individuals subjected to racial or religious hatred may suffer substantial psychological stress, the damaging consequences including a loss of self-esteem, feelings of anger, and outrage’ is confounded by archaic concepts of psychological processes.” Basically put Persinger’s position was that the psychological methods used back in the mid-1960’s to determine whether or not “hate propaganda” was dangerous and in need of criminal protection are now completely out of date and irrelevant.

Having stated his position Crown then responded by going on the same attack used in cross-examining Dr. Jay. Prosecutor Rodney Garson did all he could to down play and dismiss Dr. Persinger’s expertise, focussing primarily on the fact that Dr. Persinger had not, in his estimation, read or written scholarly articles on “hate speech”. Garson then quoted a number of reviews written in legal journals that focussed on the subject of “hate speech”. As he referenced them it became quite apparent to myself that all of the authors of the articles were Jewish and their arguments were specifically designed to buttress the whole concept of “hate speech” in order to lend a fabricated sense of authenticity to it.

Earlier in his presentation Dr. Persinger had already stated that he doesn’t use the term “hate speech” in his work for the simple reason that it’s too vague, unscientific and open to multiply shades of interpretation. He didn’t go so far as to state that the term itself is actually a cognitive construct coined by the Jews for their own propaganda purposes but it was evident that the whole notion of “Hate Propaganda” is one that was created by Jewish lobbyists in order to justify their implementation of “Hate Propaganda” laws into Canada’s Criminal Code. Dr. Persinger also made a point of stating at the start of his testimony that he doesn’t read legal documents as they are generally out of his sphere of expertise yet Crown kept on doggedly asking Dr. Persinger if he’d read this book or that book or any of the plethora of materials on “hate speech” (the vast majority written by Jews) and eventually the good Dr. responded to Garson’s incessant questioning by stating, “No, I’m not familiar with that book. I usually read detective books.”

By Thursday, October 6th the arguments still continued back and forth as to whether or not Dr. Persinger was qualified to give expert testimony related to the issues surrounding the Charter challenge. Prior to the morning recess S.C. Justice Butler told the court that after the break he would give his oral ruling on the matter. He returned at 11:59 a.m. and ruled that Dr. Persinger was qualified to testify.

Court did not resume until 2:35 that afternoon. Dr. Persinger’s health was such that he could only speak for certain lengths of time and then it was necessary for him to take a break. By 3:30 p.m. during Crown’s cross-examination Dr. Persinger’s energy was waining and Justice Butler decided that it would be better stop and set another date when Crown might be able to complete their portion of the cross-examination. A new date of October 19th, 2016 was set with the proceedings to take place in the Vancouver Supreme Court and following that the week of November 7th, 8th and 9th, 2016 was set for the completion of arguments on the Bedford Threshold.

The Hearing (Part 2)
The Vancouver SC portion of Crown’s final cross-examination of Dr. Persinger was over within a couple of hours in the afternoon. Due to the fact that I was already down on the coast on other personal matters I was able to attend in person.

The Hearing (Part 3)
In attendance for the final two days of arguments were SC Justice Bruce Butler, my lawyer Barclay Johnson, Crown Prosecutor Rodney G. Garson and Barclay’s legal assistant Jeremy Maddock. Due to a critical issue with Legal Aid over funding my counsel, Barclay Johnson, was unable to fly up to Quesnel and so the hearing was rescheduled to resume in Victoria, BC SC where Justice Butler was already scheduled to appear for those three days. The sudden change of venue meant I couldn’t attend in person but was able to listen in from my home in Cottonwood, BC via a telephone link.

Final arguments were exchanged and when the hearing concluded SC Justice Bruce Butler announced to both Defence and Crown and myself that he would not be handing down his decision on the Charter argument until March 11th, 2017. When that date arrives either a new sentencing date will be set if we lose the argument or Justice Butler will make a positive pronouncement on the defence’s argument that Section 319(2) of the Criminal Code constitutes an infringement of Section 2(b) of Canada’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

Conclusion
The R v Roy Arthur Topham “hate speech” case essentially began February 14th, 2007 when I first was attacked by the foreign lobby organization B’nai Brith Canada and accused of posting anti-Semitic, hate articles on my website. This coming February 14th, 2017 will mark the 10 year anniversary of this assault upon my constitutional right to freedom of expression. Given that my next court appearance is not until March 11th, 2017 it’s basically a done deal that the trials and tribulations surrounding this decade long travesty of justice will have surpassed the 10 year mark.

When SC Justice Butler hands down his decision on March 11th, 2017 we will know what my options are for the future. Should Justice Butler see fit to find the circumstances surrounding this case do in fact warrant a constitutional challenge to Sec. 319(2) of the Criminal Code then the immediate result will be a stay of the charge against me but that, in all probability, will only continue until the BC Crown in all likelihood appeals the decision of Justice Butler and the whole proceeding then shifts from the BC Supreme Court level to the federal Supreme Court for further adjudication.

On the other hand, should Justice Butler find my argument doesn’t pass the Bedford Threshold test then I will be faced with Sentencing on the guilty verdict in Count 1 soon after his decision. At that time I will have to decide whether or not to appeal the verdict in Count 1 and begin all over again with a new trial or else accept the verdict and whatever legal repercussions it entails.

Barclay Johnson, my legal counsel throughout the trial and the Charter hearing, has informed me that should the case go to the Supreme Court of Canada on appeal that it would entail a very costly and lengthy process of litigation running into hundreds of thousands of dollars and possibly a number of year of more court appearances which would occur not here in my home town of Quesnel but require my travelling to Ottawa, Ontario. Given the fact that I don’t fly this would be an additionally onerous undertaking that I’m not excited about. Therefore, speaking frankly, at this point in time I don’t find the prospect of years of more litigation a very attractive option for either myself or my wife who is dealing with serious medical issues that require urgent attention. This coming February I will turn 70 years old. That is also another factor which will affect whether or not I decide to enter into a further protracted legal battle which I can hardly afford to undertake considering the reasons given above. If wishes were horses then beggars would ride and I might be able to hand the reins over to a younger free speech warrior who could take up the torch and carry on to Ottawa with it but, unfortunately, wishes are not our four-footed friends.

The only thing that appears relatively certain at this point in time is that I and my wife will have close to four months off and a chance to rest up and consider our options for the future.

In final closing I would like to quote once again from Jeremy Maddock’s article in the Friends of Freedom newsletter with respect to funding. He writes, “As this complex process unfolds, Mr. Topham depends on donations to fund various expenses, including expert witnesses, transcripts, and ongoing legal research support. This is the first time since Keegstra (in 1990) that the Courts have entertained a constitutional challenge of the Criminal Code hate speech provision, and it could be the best opportunity in a generation to support internet free speech.”

There are still bills to pay and costs involved so if there is any chance supporters can afford to contribute toward these expenses I would be sincerely appreciative of any assistance. Please go the following website to making a donation or else send a donation to the mailing address shown below:

Arthur Topham
4633 Barkerville Highway
Quesnel, B.C.
V2J 6T8
THANK YOU!
Arthur Topham
Pub/Ed
The Radical Press
Canada’s Radical News Network
“Digging to the root of the issues since 1998”
–––––––– 88 ––––––––
*** (Note please that the full transcript of the trial can be found HERE for those interested in reading it and preserving it should my website eventually be taken down.)
 

West cracks down on universities for open debates on Holocaust: Interview with Prof. Anthony Hall By Khamenei News Service, Iran

http://english.khamenei.ir/news/4330/West-cracks-down-on-universitities-for-open-debates-on-Holocaust

West cracks down on universities for open debates on Holocaust: Interview with Prof. Anthony Hall
By
Khamenei News Service, Iran

screen-shot-2016-11-17-at-8-33-15-am

tonyhalliran

If academic freedom is not to be respected in institutions of supposedly higher learning then there can be no basis for freedom of speech in environments not subject to the protections of tenure. The first to suffer the crackdown in universities will be our students.

Dr. Anthony J.Hall is a Professor of Globalization Studies at the University of Lethbridge in Alberta Canada. Professor Hall is the editor-in-chief of the American Herald Tribune. He is author of several books, including a two-volume publishing project at McGill-Queen’s University Press entitled “The Bowl with One Spoon”; American Empire and the Fourth World: The Bowl with One Spoon, Part I (McGill-Queen’s Native and Northern) Earth into Property: Colonization, Decolonization, and Capitalism: The Bowl with One Spoon, Part II (Mcgill-Queen’s Native and Northern Series). The Part II edition was recently selected by The UK Independent as one of the best books of 2010. The Journal of the American Library Association called Earth into Property, “A scholarly tour de force.” The books aim to set the 9/11 catastrophe and post 9/11 Wars in the context of global history, since 1492. Dr. Hall has been suspended and harshly pulled from his classroom, in mid-term without any process of arbitration: namely, for having expressed his viewpoints on Israeli crimes, calling for an open debate on the Holocaust and 9/11, despite being promoted to a Full Professor rank through a process of peer review. In an exclusive interview with Khamenei.ir Professor Hall elaborates on how academic freedom is perceived and practiced in the West:

Ayatollah Khamenei has stated that “genuine freedom of thought will help the country to progress. In the absence of a free intellectual atmosphere, there can be no opportunity for growth.” How do you– as a Professor– perceive it?

I reflected very self-consciously on the prospects of contributing to the progress of my country Canada when I opted in the mid to late 1970s to go to graduate school at the University of Toronto. With the great Canadian historian, J.M.S. Careless, as my Ph.D. Supervisor I made a commitment to study the history of colonial relations with the First Nations of Canada. My course of study took me in 1982 to my first appointment in the Native Studies Department at the University of Sudbury. The University of Sudbury was in those years a Jesuit-run entity. It formed the institutional seed from which the secular Laurentian University would emerge in the decades prior to my appointment there.

For the next two decades I was able to work from my academic bases in Sudbury and then in Lethbridge Alberta beginning in 1990. At the invitation of the Leroy Little Bear, the Chair of the Department of Native American Studies I thus moved to the resource-rich province of Alberta. Once again I was motivated to make the transition in my professional work with the hope my I could contribute constructively to the progress of our country from an academic base in Western Canada.

In my years as a young professor I took an active part in four First Nations/First Ministers conferences that took place in Ottawa between 1983 and 1987. The purpose of these conferences was to negotiate a constitutional amendment to give greater definition to the phrase, “the existing Aboriginal and treaty rights of the Aboriginal peoples of Canada are hereby recognized and affirmed.” (Section 35, Constitution Act, 1982).

Section 35 was part of the text of the instrument facilitating the movement of authority over Canada’s constitutional structure from the British imperial Mother Country to the domestic institutions of Canadian federalism.

The culmination of my contributions to the formulation of a made-in-Canada version of the Canadian constitution involved my opposition between 1987 and 1990 to what became known as the Meech Lake accord. If this political deal between Canada’s First Ministers had become constitutional law, the First Nations of Canada would have been excluded from a very powerful legal definition of Canada’s “fundamental characteristic.”

In academic essays, in the mainstream media and in presentations to various legislative committees, I contributed to public awareness of the negative implications of the Meech Lake accord for fair-minded Canadians supportive of existing Aboriginal and treaty rights. More specifically I contributed to the strength of the platform from which an Oji-Cree parliamentarian by the name of Elijah Harper used his veto power in the Manitoba Legislature to block the ratification of the Meech Lake accord. Because of Elijah Harper’s actions the Meech Lake accord did not become part of Canada’s “supreme law.”

I was able to contribute to discourse crucial to the progress of Canada until about the year 2000. Between 2000 and 2002 I had to adjust my work away from the activities of the Department of Native American Studies towards a field of my own making, Globalization Studies. I prepared two academic volumes to lay the academic foundation and methodological framework for my transition to a new academic role. The core focus of my emphasis on “Globalization Studies” was Indigenous peoples in encounter with colonialism globally from 1492 until the present.

Untitled

It is in this context and with the encouragement of my very accomplished student, Joshua Blakeney, that I began to shift focus towards the treatment of Palestinian and other Arab peoples in the region of Greater Israel, Eretz Israel. It was Joshua who also led me to my first interactions with Iranian journalists resulting in my participation in the New Horizon conference of the autumn of 2014. As I have described in writing elsewhere this episode proved to make a major positive impact on me.

Due to the intervention of my colleague, the Mohawk activist Splitting The Sky, I also began to see the events of 9/11 as a major factor in the shaping of the global geopolitics in the twenty-first century.

splittingtheskyportrait-copy

My quest for new academic turf at the University of Lethbridge has sometimes been bumpy and contested. Certainly many major obstacles were put in the way of my promotion to full professor. Eventually my academic peers were allowed to make their input into the promotion process apart from the artificial blockages thrown up by my University administration. In 2008 after what I took to be my obtaining a position of intellectual and professional security as a senior faculty member, I resolved that henceforth I would pursue difficult lines of research and publication. I made this decision with an understanding that less secure younger colleagues might eschew such a course of action.

I have made no secret of the fact that I see the recent surrender of the high ground of academic freedom by the members of the administration of the University of Lethbridge as an indicator that Canada is on a downwards spiral. It seems to me there is a move a foot to sabotage the intellectual freedom of our universities. If academic freedom is not to be respected in institutions of supposedly higher learning, then there can be no basis for freedom of speech in environments not subject to the protections of tenure.

The first to suffer the crackdown in universities will be our students. They will have to deal with the fact that the treatment visited on me indicates it has become dangerous to ask pointed questions which might produce answers embarrassing to power. Our country, Canada, cannot progress to higher levels of discourse and achievement under these repressive conditions.

Ayatollah Khamenei believes “exchanging viewpoints and opinions are in the nature of academic work”; How is this principle practiced at Lethbridge University?

I agree that exchanging viewpoints and opinions is a central aspect of academic work within universities and between universities. I found that there was a good deal of openness to the exchange of information and ideas with colleagues, media and public officials in the years between 1982 and 2001 when the core of my academic work revolved around the history of Canada-First Nations relations.

Unfortunately I would have to say that the obstacles to the exchange of information and ideas began to mount significantly after 2008 when I began to question the official narrative of what happened on 9/11. Who really did what to whom during the initiating events of what soon became known as the Global War on Terror? As I began to become skeptical of the official narrative I noticed more and more inclination on the part of colleagues to distance themselves from the subjects that captured my professional interest. To put it bluntly, I suppose it became clear to me that, for a number of reasons, it was not a good career move for younger colleagues to show interest in the subject of 9/11 specifically and false flag terrorism more generally.

As I began to look more deeply into the existing research on 9/11 I was simultaneously drawn to the subject of war crimes and international law. My collaboration with Splitting The Sky became more intense when we went to work to organize in response to the decision of the former US President, George W. Bush, to give a talk in Calgary in 2009 as his first public engagement as (theoretically) a regular civilian citizen. Our collective action in Calgary in the spring of 2009 led to a trial that we dubbed Splitting The Sky versus George W. Bush. Although I had not yet associated the lies and crimes of 9/11 with Israel First protagonists, I ran into my first Zionist pushback for my 9/11 studies when I presented my essay, “Should George W. Bush Be Arrested in Calgary, Alberta, To Be Tried For International Crimes?” I originally presented the paper at an invited talk at the University of Winnipeg.

My essay eventually ended up as an exhibit in the litigation that we referred to as Splitting The Sky versus George W. Bush. Our stance was that the former US President should have been arrested in Canada for being a credibly-accused war criminal. We were far from alone in bringing forward evidence that Bush had violated many international covenants and conventions against, for instance, prohibited torture. Not only had he arguably violated international law but it seemed the former US President had violated Canada’s own Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes Act. The legislation had passed through Parliament with the view that Canada should not become a haven for war criminals.

In pursuing this line of analysis I faced my first allegations that somehow my academic inquiry was anti-Semitic.

As I worked on this subject, one that I integrated into my pedagogy, it became clear to me that we have never seen anything but victor’s justice when it comes to the enforcement of international law against those that commit war crimes, crimes against humanity, crimes against the peace and crimes against democracy. It seems that only those on the losing side of military conflicts are ever brought to justice. Those on the “winning” side, the stronger side, are invariably held to be above the law.

This line of scholarly investigation did result in various channels of academic exchange opening up for me with colleagues in my own university and other universities. The most fruitful collaboration to develop, however, was that with Dr. Kevin Barrett who had lost his academic position at the University of Wisconsin for incorporating 9/11-related subjects into his research and pedagogy.

For sure I should not be made to feel so alone in the academy when it comes to the study of 9/11, the most transformative event of the twenty-first century. In my view the academic institutions in North America and Europe have failed abysmally in the study of false flag terrorism starting with the events of 9/11. I am particularly appalled by how this failure on the part of our institutions of higher learning has contributed to the rise of Islamophobia as the necessary psychological condition giving license to those promoting the invasions of Muslim-majority countries.

In a meeting with President Rouhani and his Cabinet, the Leader of the Islamic Revolution said: “When it comes to caricatures insulting the sanctities of Islam, the West suddenly becomes an advocates of freedom and the freedom of expression. However, when it comes to the Holocaust, there is no freedom of expression!” Why do you think we witness such double standards?

A gross display of double standards plagues the ethnocentric way “freedom” is being defined in the so-called “West.” The psychological operations attending the “We Are Charlie Hebdo” ceremonies on Paris in early 2015 epitomized the hypocrisy. The whole essence of this strange event in the city of Lights seemed to signal that “freedom of speech and expression” in the West is virtually limitless when it comes to demeaning through cartoons of Prophet Mohammed as well as other sacred symbols of Islamic religion. The other side of the same coin are the many prohibitions imposed on, for instance, the French comedian M’bala M’bala Dieudonné. Dieudonné was barred from entering Canada for his efforts to make humor of the paranoid state of affairs attending any public references to Jews, Jewish institutions or the activities of Israel these days.

dieudonne

One of my discoveries through this period of crisis is the fact that the thought police agents in the B’nai Brith equate my call for open debate on “the holocaust,” and indeed open debate on all subjects, as the equivalent of so-called “holocaust denial.” How many of my colleagues at the University of Lethbridge and in other universities have bent before the harsh intimidation? How many have made themselves proponents of shutting down open debate and allowing censorship from outside the academy to regulate our research, teaching and publication?

There is a controversial quote from Ayatollah Khamenei in which he says’ “May God curse all those who put an end to political thoughts, work and endeavor in universities”. What’s your take on that? How essential do you think such a perspective is for the academia?

I agree wholeheartedly with the Supreme Leader’s observation. One of the great gifts of the Creator to humans is the gift of reason and rationality. Our application of reason and rationality to our understanding of society will inevitably contribute to political thought, work and endeavor.

This type of applied reason should be especially vital in the work of universities where the highest level of political conception should be able to find expression, elaboration, and receptiveness. Indeed we need to make ourselves expert in Universities at making safe places for the development of political discourse. God curse us in the universities if we cannot be the home for vibrant political discourse.

This wasn’t an election. It was a revolution. By Daniel Greenfield. Posted by Paul Craig Roberts

revolutionnotelectionhdr

This Wasn’t A Vote, It Was An Uprising

Intro by Paul Craig Roberts

Dear Readers: The article below has come to me. I am unable to ascertain if it is a published statement or one of those items sent around the Internet. Nevertheless, I do believe that it captures the attitude of those Americans who in the vast majority of the states gave their vote to Donald Trump.

The optimism expessed in the article might be unrealistic. In order to prevail over the Oligarchy, President Trump will need a government as strong as he appears to be. He cannot find the strength he needs for his government among the usual Washington, Wall Street, and corporate sources. If he selects from these people, he will be impotent.

The question is: who is his transition team? Are they focused on making nice with the Oligachs? If so, there will be no change.

The Democratic Party failed America for the eight years of the Clinton Regime, which committed war crimes and overthrew a sovereign government on the basis of lies. The George W. Bush Regime originated the Middle East wars entirely on the basis of lies. These wars have resulted in the deaths, maiming, and dislocation of millions of peoples who have sought refuge from America’s aggression in Europe. The corrupt Obama Regime has continued and expanded Bush’s illegal wars and stupidly brought the US into conflict with Russia and China, either one of which can destroy the United States of America.

Now we have the psychopath George Soros funding hired protesters, who are bussed from protest to protest, in an effort to delegitimize the Trump presidency. This is an act of treason, but oligarchs such as Soros are above the law. They are never held accounable. Trump should arrest Soros and put him on trial.

Trump says that he wants to bring the oligarchs under the law. If he fails, America fails with him.

This wasn’t an election. It was a revolution.

By Daniel Greenfield

It was midnight in America. The day of the election millions Americans got up and stood in front of the Machine, the great iron wheel that had been grinding them down. They stood there even though the media told them it was useless. They took their stand even while all the chattering classes laughed and taunted them as white trash racists.

They were fathers who couldn’t feed their families anymore. They were mothers who couldn’t afford health care. They were workers whose jobs had been given to foreigners in foreign countries so that the incomes of oligarchs could rise. They were sons who didn’t see a future for themselves. They were daughters afraid of being raped by the undocumented illegals flooding into their towns. They took a deep breath and they stood.

They held up their hands and the great iron wheel stopped.

Blue America crumbled. The Blue States fell one by one. Ohio. Wisconsin. Pennsylvania. Iowa. The white working class that had been overlooked and trampled on for so long got to its feet. It rose up against its oppressors. The rest of the nation, between the West coast and the North East coast–the fly-over zone– rose up with it.

They fought back against their jobs being shipped overseas while their towns filled with migrants that got everything while they got nothing. They fought back against a system in which they could go to jail for a trifle while the elites could violate the law and still stroll through a presidential election.

They fought back against being told that they had to watch what they say.

They fought back against being held in contempt because they wanted to work for a living, take care of their families, and protect the sanctity of marriage.

And they won.

This wasn’t a vote. It was an uprising.

Like the ordinary men chipping away at the Berlin Wall, they tore down an unnatural thing that had towered over them. And as they watched it fall, they marveled at how weak and fragile it had always been. And how much stronger they were than they had ever known.

Who were these people? They were the neglected in the fly-over country that is the heart of America. They didn’t have univeristy degrees, and they had never set foot in a Starbucks to pay $5 for a cup of coffee. They were the white working class. They didn’t talk right or think right. They had the wrong ideas, the wrong clothes and the ridiculous idea that they still mattered.

They were told they were wrong about everything. Illegal immigration. Black Lives Matter, but not jobs for the oppressed middle class. Manufacturing is unnecessary for an economy in which financial profits are all important. Transgendered bathrooms. Same gender marriages. Americans were supposed to bow down and surrender to a handful of perverts.

Told that the future belongs to the metrosexual dot com transgendered globalist, and not to the guy who once had a good job before the globalist corporations with Washington’s blessings sent it to China or Mexico, real Americans revolted.

White trash American couldn’t change anything, declared the pundits. But instead of adapting to the inevitable future of America’s demise, they got in their pickup trucks and drove out to vote.

And they changed everything.

Barack Hussein Obama boasted that he had changed America. And he did for the worse. A billion regulations, millions of immigrants, a hundred thousand lies and it was no longer our America.

White Trash America voted and sent Obama to Hell. They walked through him and through the Democratic Party like the wet paper bag that they are. Voters abandoned the party that had sold out the American people. More black Americans voted for Trump than voted for Romney.

The election repudiated the Obamas, the Clintons, the celebrities, and the media. Americans turned the One Percent’s world upside down.

CNN is weeping. MSNBC is wailing. ABC calls it a tantrum. NBC damns it. It wasn’t supposed to happen. The same machine that crushed the American people for six straight terms, the mass of neoconned government, globalist corporations and oligarch-financed non-profits that ran the country, was set to win. Or so they thought.

Instead the people stood in front of the Machine. They blocked it with their votes even though the media told them Hillary was the certain winner. They mailed in their absentee ballots even while Hillary Clinton was planning her fireworks victory celebration. They looked at the empty factories and barren farms. They drove through the early cold. They waited in line. They came home to their children to tell them that they had done their best for their future. They bet on America. And they won.

They sre tired of the absence of affordable health care and recognize the fraud of Obamacare. They are tired of unemployment and of being lied to. They are tired of watching their sons come back in coffins so that the military/security complex could continue to loot America with their wars. They are tired of being called names and watching the theft of their country.

They understood that Trump was right. The election was their last hope, their last chance to save themselves and their country. And they did.

This election was not about who gets to use the female toilet. It wasn’t about whether it is racist to enforce the immigration laws. It wasn’t about how men, however uncouthly, express their sexual interest in women.

It was about suffering Americans, whose names no one except a server and the NSA will ever know, fighting back against their oppression. It was about the homeless woman guarding Trump’s star. It was about the betrayed Democrats searching for someone to represent them in Ohio and Pennsylvania. It was about the union men who refused to sell out their futures and vote for a Democrat who is an agent of the One Percent.

The media will never interview those men and women. We will never see their faces. But they are us and we are them. They came to the aid of a nation in peril. They did what real Americans have always done. They did the impossible.


Article printed from PaulCraigRoberts.org: http://www.paulcraigroberts.org

URL to article: http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2016/11/12/this-wasnt-a-vote-it-was-an-uprising/

The Trump Victory: What We Saw And What We Need To See By Chuck Baldwin

trumpvictorycbaldwinhdr

The Trump Victory: What We Saw And What We Need To See

By Chuck Baldwin
November 10, 2016

What We Saw

Let’s be honest: we saw a historic election Tuesday night. The only election coming close to the stunning proportions of this election was Ronald Reagan’s first election in 1980. And even that one didn’t match Trump’s victory. Yes, it was a stunning victory for Donald Trump.

Let’s be clear about what we witnessed. In one presidential election, we saw a man completely demolish the neocon and neolib establishments of both major parties; the media establishment; the globalist establishment; Wall Street; the political machine of an incumbent President; and the Clinton/Bush political/criminal empires. The odds of ANYONE being able to overcome the combined wealth and power of the leviathans above was absolutely zero. Each one of the listed cabals has enough power to destroy any would-be challenger. That Donald Trump was able to beat them all was truly incredible–maybe even miraculous. And he not only beat them; he trounced them.

Over the years, Ross Perot, Pat Buchanan and Ron Paul had done the preliminary work of loading the bases for Trump. These men helped awaken the sleeping giant that roared to life Tuesday night. But it was Donald Trump who knocked the ball clean out of the park. And he did it as an outside slugger in the opposition’s home park–a park in which the owners, officials, and gatekeepers had rigged the game to insure he would strike out. To their shock and dismay, he didn’t.

Make no mistake about it: the globalists, neocons, neolibs, international bankers, national media, and power establishment in both major parties are scrambling now to figure out how they were beaten and what they must do to try to reclaim the sudden loss of their power and influence.

Donald Trump might have delayed the total destruction of our freedoms–at least for awhile. We’ll see.

It would certainly appear that the Clinton/Bush Crime Family has been dealt a serious, if not fatal, blow. In one presidential campaign, Donald Trump sent Jeb Bush to the showers and sent Bill and Hillary packing (maybe for another country in order to try to stay out of a U.S. prison). I suggest that the Clintons consider Qatar. It is a country that successfully purchased much influence in Bill’s presidential administration and Hillary’s Secretary of State’s office, and it is also a country that does not participate in U.S. extradition policy.

I tell you the truth, breaking up the Bush/Clinton Crime Family and perhaps ridding the United States of their death grip on U.S. politics might be the GREATEST success of Trump’s victory Tuesday night. The swamp was drained a lot just by getting rid of the Clintons (forever)–and maybe the Bushes too (at least for quite a while).

And forgive me for gloating just a bit. Over a year and a half ago, on April 14, 2015, I made this bold prediction on my Facebook page: “You heard it here first: Hillary Clinton will NOT be our next President.”

As far as what’s visible, the biggest loser Tuesday night was the mainstream media (MSM). Never in history had the MSM banded so tightly together with the single goal and aim in mind of completely destroying one man’s political campaign. They were relentless and ruthless. They truly used every dastardly, duplicitous, and devilish trick in the book to defeat Trump. And, for once, the American people completely saw through it.

People in this country have been growing increasingly fed up with the overbearing, arrogant, holier-than-thou, rub-your-nose-in-the-dirt establishment. They are sick and tired of the political elite, such as the Clintons, getting away with corruption and criminality. They are sick and tired of corrupt presidents circumventing Congress and attempting to make law via unconstitutional executive orders. They are sick and tired of the media demeaning and lying to them day after day after day. They are sick and tired of all of these foreign wars of aggression that kill and maim their family members while enriching the political and corporate elite. They are sick and tired of immoral entertainers in music and Hollywood flaunting their corrupt and debauched lifestyles while telling them how evil they are for not supporting their corrupt and debauched buddies in politics.

Speaking of the corrupt Hollywood elite, here is another potential blessing of Trump’s victory Tuesday night: several Hollywood super-smuts have said they would leave the country if Trump won. These include Barbra Streisand, Bryan Cranston, Miley Cyrus, Lena Dunham, Amy Schumer, Jon Stewart, Samuel Jackson, Whoopi Goldberg, Neve Campbell, Keegan-Michael Key, George Lopez, Ne-Yo, and Al Sharpton. I hope they are all buying their one-way plane tickets as we speak. It would be worth a Trump victory watching these people’s backsides disappearing over the horizon.

What We Need To See

We need to see Donald Trump follow through with what he said he would do (the good stuff that is). If he doesn’t, it is all but certain that he will be a one-term President.

He needs to follow through with strict enforcement of our national borders. He needs to stop illegal immigration. He needs to deport the Middle Eastern refugees that Obama brought into the country. He needs to cut off financial aid to the illegal aliens that are already here. He needs to immediately lead the charge in a totally Republican Congress to rescind Obamacare. He needs to put an end to our endless wars of aggression in the Middle East. He needs to leave Syria alone and stop meddling in President Assad’s internal affairs. He needs to pull NATO back from encroaching on Russia’s territorial boundaries, waterways and airspace and let Vladimir Putin know that the United States will stop being a global bully. He needs to instruct our CIA (and find a director who will enthusiastically follow his instructions) to withdraw ALL covert U.S. support for Muslim terror groups such as ISIS–in which case, they would quickly dissolve.

Trump needs to lead the charge in Congress to reduce taxes and government regulation and spending across the board. If he would propose dismantling the EPA, BLM, OSHA, and the federal Department of Education (and throw in the Department of Commerce and a bunch more of these government bureaucracies whose only reason for existing is to harass the American people), we would know he means business. He needs to tell the ATF to get off the backs of law-abiding gun manufacturers, retailers, and gun owners. And he needs to fire FBI Director James Comey.

Trump needs to follow through with his trade policies. He needs to lead the charge to expunge NAFTA, to kill TPP dead in its tracks, and to institute fair trade practices, including enacting competing tariffs and imposts and removing the egregious taxes and regulations that have forced businesses to relocate production plants overseas–and give them every financial incentive to bring them back to the United States.

Trump needs to appoint a Supreme Court justice that not only recognizes the constitutional rights of life and gun ownership and possession but one that is also determined to protect the Fourth Amendment. He also needs to follow through with his stated intention of urging Congress to remove the 1954 Johnson Amendment from the 501c3 tax code. In addition, he needs to sign an executive order rescinding most of the executive orders issued by former presidents Obama, Bush, and Clinton.

Trump needs to appoint a special prosecutor to thoroughly investigate and then prosecute Hillary and Bill Clinton along with many of their willing accomplices. If Trump truly wants to drain the swamp, he must begin by bringing these career criminals to justice.

These are the things that we need to see, and if Trump is as genuine and committed to liberty as he claims to be, many of these things we will see.

Now let me caution everyone. That Donald Trump was not controlled by the establishment was obvious. But that doesn’t mean for one second that he cannot yet become controlled by the establishment. Being an outsider does not necessarily mean that Donald Trump truly understands the reach and tentacles of the globalist [Jewish] conspiracy. I truly hope he does; but only time will tell.

Plus, we need to be praying much for Trump’s personal safety, because the power elite would not hesitate to assassinate this man if they felt he was a genuine threat to their globalist agenda and that killing him was the only way they could stop him. I remind you that Mr. Reagan was shot just 70 days after assuming office. Remember that the establishment was absolutely convinced that Hillary would win the White House up to and even during the elections. Trump’s victory came as a total shock to them. I hope everyone around him comprehends the threat level that Donald Trump is now living under and that they are doing everything possible to protect him.

In the meantime, don’t expect House Speaker Paul Ryan and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell to willingly support Trump, should he follow through with a smaller government domestic agenda and a non-interventionist foreign policy agenda. At their core, Ryan and McConnell are globalist neocons. In fact, if the Republican caucus in the House truly wants to work with Trump, they will elect a brand new Speaker, one that shares Trump’s stated vision.

Speaking of which, here are some of the things that we do NOT need to see:

We do not need to see Trump putting a lot of neocons and globalists in his administration. This is what seriously compromised Ronald Reagan’s presidency. Trump already chose a soft globalist, Mike Pence, as his Vice President. Reagan chose Granddaddy Globalist George H.W. Bush, which led to all of the assaults against our liberties that have taken place through the successive administrations of Bill Clinton, G.W. Bush, and Barack Obama.

We need to pay close attention to who Trump places in his administration. During his victory speech, he lauded neocon globalists Rudy Giuliani and Chris Christie. That was not a good sign. If Trump loads his cabinet with neocons, globalists, and CFR members (of which none is worse than Newt Gingrich), he dooms his presidency. These people are no friends of liberty or the Constitution and would use their considerable influence to dilute Trump’s less government, more freedom agenda.

We do not need to see Trump giving police agencies the green light to “stop and frisk” people. This has always been one of my greatest concerns about Trump. If he’s not very careful, his strong “law and order” agenda can morph into a further burgeoning Police State.

We do not need to see Trump targeting religious houses of worship for unconstitutional searches and harassment. Freedom of religion is sacrosanct in this country, even for those people whose religion we dislike. Once you eviscerate First Amendment protections for one group of people, NO group of people is safe from government persecution.

Trump’s victory was truly stunning. It was the triumph of freedom-loving people who are fed up with an obnoxious, abrasive, overbearing, arrogant ruling class. Truly, it was the people’s victory. But now those same people must be vigilant to make sure that the ruling class they defeated at the polls does not come back and corrupt the champion who led the revolt. It is okay for people to celebrate–as long as they don’t then do what they have been known to do so often: go into a state of deep and protracted slumber. I remind you that most of the damage to our liberties over the past several decades has come from Republican administrations. Again, please remember that the GOP Congress Trump has inherited is led by staunch neocons.

“Eternal vigilance is the price of liberty,” said Wendell Phillips. How right he was. Stay vigilant, folks! And let’s pray that Mr. Trump will be the President that we need “for such a time as this.” And let’s do everything that we can as citizen watchmen to make sure he is.

© Chuck Baldwin

Stefan Molyneux: “Anti-Donald Trump Protests and Riots | True News” VIDEO

anti-donaldtrumpproriotstefanmhdr

CLICK HERE TO VIEW

 

On Trump’s Victory by Gilad Atzmon

 

screen-shot-2016-11-11-at-6-17-20-pm
trumpsvictoryhdr

On Trump’s Victory

By Gilad Atzmon

It occurred to me in recent years that the act of being Progressive is not a political position but rather a mental state.

The incapacity of the entire American progressive and Left establishment to foresee Trump’s landslide victory suggests that we are dealing with people who are institutionally detached.

Just three days ahead of the presidential elections, the Huffington Post pathetically criticised star pollster Nate Silver of “Unskewing Polls in Trump’s direction,” for suggesting that Trump victory was realistic.  Ryan Grim wrote: “HuffPost Pollster is giving Clinton a 98 percent chance of winning, and The New York Times’ model at The Upshot puts her chances at 85 percent.”

There is one outlier, however, that is causing waves of panic among Democrats around the country and injecting Trump backers with the hope that their guy might pull this thing off after all. Nate Silver’s 538 model gives Donald Trump a heart-stopping 35% chance of winning as of this weekend.”

(http://www.huffingtonpost.com)

The Huffington Post goes as far as accusing Silver of “making a mockery of the very forecasting industry that he popularized.”

In perspectives, Nate Silver and his 538 were obviously spot on. The Huffington Post and The New York Times were totally off the mark. Is it a coincidence?

How is it possible that the Democratic Party, the mainstream media and Wall Street have managed to totally miss the level of anger that unites the American masses. These questions go far beyond polling strategy or the science of statistics.  We are dealing with a state of being aloof on the verge of total detachment.

Left and progressive thinking is shaped like a dream. It tells us what the world ought to be. Progressives often seem to forget what the world really is and what its people are really like.  Hillary Clinton and her campaign, just like the New York Times and The Huffington Post, were in a state of denial. Boasting in righteous hubris, they failed to read the map.

“Progressive thought is the secular manifestation of ‘chosenness’. It is inherently Jewish, a fact that explains why Hillary Clinton’s top five donors were Jewish billionaires.”

But this shouldn’t take us by a complete surprise. Detachment wasn’t invented by Clinton and her team. Detachment and alienation are ingrained in progressive thought. To be a progressive is to believe that some of the ‘other’ people are simply a bunch of unaware ‘reactionaries.’ Progressive thought is the secular manifestation of ‘chosenness’. It is inherently Jewish, a fact that explains why Hillary Clinton’s top five donors were Jewish billionaires.

Since being progressive is a form of supremacy. I would go as far as suggesting that progressives’ antagonism towards ‘white supremacy’, is at large, a form of projection. The progressive attributes to ‘Whiteness’ his own exceptionalist inclinations.

Americans vs. Identitarians

On election day, we learned that the Democratic Party was hanging on a thread, hoping to be saved by Florida’s ‘Hispanic vote.’ Clinton’s political future depended upon the hope that Trump had managed to upset enough Latinos. This peculiar development in which a national party is dependent on group politics shouldn’t take us by surprise anymore.

The 2016 American presidential election divided America into two camps: The Americans on one side and the Identitarians on the other. The Americans are those who see themselves primarily as American patriots. They are driven by rootedness and heritage. For them, the promise to make ‘America great again’ confirms that utopia is nostalgia and that the progressive reality is nothing short of dystopia.  The Identitarians, on the other hand, are those who subscribe to progressive sectarian politics. They see themselves primarily as LGBTQ, Latino, Black, Jews, Women, and so on. Their bond with the American national or patriotic ethos is secondary and often non-existent.  The future of the Democratic party, in its current form, depends upon the hope that American subscriptions to sectarian ideologies will gradually increase and, as a result, will eventually strengthen the context of identity or group politics.  The progressive agenda banks on the divestiture of the national and patriotic ethos. Needless to mention that half of America voted for Clinton. Hence, this political agenda is far from being farfetched or delusional.

But the Identitarian agenda backfired. It was only a question of time before the so-called ‘whites’ or ‘rednecks’ grasped that their backs have been pressed to the wall.  They also started to act and think as an identitarian political sector.  Hillary Clinton calling Trump’s voters a “basket of deplorables” was a clear sign for white poor Americans that Hillary wasn’t exactly their ally. However, Hillary was far from being alone. Almost every Jewish writer within the American press didn’t miss the opportunity to attribute the “White Supremacist” label to Trump’s voters.  For Cheryl Greenberg, Trump’s popularity was “the final gasping of white supremacy.”  For Talking Points Memo’s Josh Marshall, Trump’s closing ad was packed with “anti-Semitic dog whistles, anti-Semitic tropes, and anti-Semitic vocabulary.”  For Marshall and Goldberg, half of the American people were dogs obeying their master’s whistle.

It shouldn’t take us by surprise that half of the American people would eventually react. They became weary of Jewish progressives like Marshall and Goldberg seeing them as dogs and white supremacists. The time was ripe for a revolution.

So is the revolution here? I’m not holding my breath. The people who crowned Trump are certainly exhausted. They are ready for a change. Can Trump introduce such a change? No one knows. He is certainly going to keep us entertained.


SOURCE ARTICLE

Donald Trump wins U.S. election in astonishing victory by ZBC

 Donald Trump wins U.S. election in astonishing victory 

Trump will be 45th president, oldest 1st-term president, and have Republican led-Senate and House

screen-shot-2016-11-09-at-6-43-15-am

Donald Trump has been elected the next president of the United States — a remarkable showing by the celebrity businessman and political novice who upended American politics with his bombastic rhetoric.

Trump rode an astonishing wave of support from voters seeking sweeping change, capitalizing on voters’ economic anxieties, taking advantage of racial tensions and overcoming a string of sexual assault allegations on his way to the White House.

His triumph over Hillary Clinton will end eight years of Democratic dominance of the White House and threatens to undo major achievements of President Barack Obama. He has pledged to act quickly to repeal Obama’s landmark health-care law, revoke the nuclear agreement with Iran and rewrite important trade deals with other countries, particularly Mexico and Canada.

Following his win, and a victory speech in which he pledged, “I will not let you down,” Trump said in a tweet Wednesday morning: “The forgotten man and woman will never be forgotten again. We will all come together as never before.”

For her part, Clinton did not give a formal concession speech, but called Trump early Wednesday to congratulate him. She is expected to speak to her supporters Wednesday morning at a New York hotel, in what will be her first public remarks since her stunning defeat.

Obama has reacted to Trump’s victory by inviting him to meet at the White House on Thursday.

The White House says Obama called Trump from his residence in the White House to congratulate him. White House spokesman Josh Earnest says the Thursday meeting is to discuss the presidential transition.

Obama also called Clinton early Wednesday. The White House says Obama conveyed admiration for the “strong campaign she waged throughout the country.”

Despite losing the state-by-state electoral battle that determines the presidency, Clinton narrowly led Trump in the nationwide popular vote, according to U.S. media tallies. It marks the second time in 16 years that a Democratic candidate lost the presidency despite winning more votes than the victor. In 2000, Democrat Al Gore got more votes than Republican George W. Bush.

Trump’s key to victory

Trump blasted through Democrats’ longstanding firewall, carrying Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, states that hadn’t voted for a Republican presidential candidate since the 1980s. He needed to win nearly all of the competitive battleground states, and he did just that, claiming Florida, Ohio, North Carolina and others.

Global stock markets and U.S. stock futures plunged deeply, reflecting investor alarm over what a Trump presidency might mean for the economy and trade. Initially, the Dow was forecast to open some 800 points lower Wednesday. But following a fairly conciliatory victory speech by the president-elect, the Dow is now anticipated to open down 360 points, or two per cent. Losses have been similarly trimmed in European markets. Germany’s DAX, for example, is only 1.5 per cent lower at 10,330 while Britain’s FTSE 100 index is down 0.6 per cent at 6,802.

screen-shot-2016-11-09-at-6-43-38-am

President-elect Donald Trump kisses his wife Melania Trump as his daughter Ivanka Trump watches approvingly after giving his acceptance speech rally. (John Locher/The Associated Press)

A New York real estate developer who lives in a sparkling Manhattan highrise, Trump forged a striking connection with white, working class Americans who feel left behind in a changing economy and diversifying country. He cast immigration, both from Latin America and the Middle East, as the root of the problems plaguing many Americans and tapped into fears of terrorism emanating at home and abroad.

Trump will take office with Congress expected to be fully under Republican control. Republican Senate candidates fended off Democratic challengers in key states and appeared poised to maintain the majority. Republicans also maintained their grip on the House.

Senate control means Trump will have great leeway in appointing Supreme Court justices, which could mean a major change to the right that could last for decades.

screen-shot-2016-11-09-at-6-43-49-am

Trump upended years of political convention on his way to the White House, levelling harshly personal insults on his rivals, deeming Mexican immigrants rapists and murderers, and vowing to temporarily suspend Muslim immigration to the U.S.

He never released his tax returns, breaking with decades of campaign tradition, and eschewed the kind of robust data and field efforts that helped Obama win two terms in the White House, relying instead on his large, free-wheeling rallies to energize supporters. His campaign was frequently in chaos, and he cycled through three campaign managers this year.

His final campaign manager, Kellyanne Conway, touted the team’s accomplishments as the final results rolled in, writing on Twitter that “rally crowds matter” and “we expanded the map.”

screen-shot-2016-11-09-at-6-43-58-am

A woman holds an American flag as she watches the voting results at Hillary Clinton’s election night event in New York. (Win McNamee/Getty Images)

The mood at Clinton’s party grew bleak as the night wore out, with some supporters leaving, others crying and hugging each other. Top campaign aides stopped returning calls and texts, as Clinton and her family hunkered down in a luxury hotel watching the returns.

At 2 a.m. ET, Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta told the crowd to head home for the night. “We’re still counting votes and every vote should count,” he said.

Trump will inherit an anxious nation, deeply divided by economic and educational opportunities, race and culture.

Exit polls underscored the fractures: Women nationwide supported Clinton by a double-digit margin, while men were significantly more likely to back Trump. More than half of white voters backed the Republican, while nearly nine in 10 blacks and two-thirds of Hispanics voted for the Democrat.

screen-shot-2016-11-09-at-6-44-08-am

Hillary Clinton gives a thumbs up to the supporters gathered outside the Douglas Grafflin Elementary School where Clinton cast her ballot in Chappaqua, New York on Tuesday, Nov. 8, 2016. (Brian Snyder/Reuters)

‘He gives people hope’

Doug Ratliff, a 67-year-old businessman from Richlands, Va., had hoped for a Trump win.

“This county has had no hope,” said Ratliff, who owns strip malls in the area badly beaten by the collapse of the coal industry. “You have no idea what it would mean for the people if Trump won. They’ll have hope again. Things will change. I know he’s not going to be perfect. But he’s got a heart. And he gives people hope.”

Trump has pledged to usher in a series of sweeping changes to U.S. domestic and foreign policy: repealing Obama’s health-care law, though he has been vague on what he could replace it with; building a wall along the U.S.-Mexico border; and suspending immigration from countries with terrorism ties.

He’s also praised Russian President Vladimir Putin and spoken of building a better relationship with Moscow, worrying some in his own party who fear he’ll go easy on Putin’s provocations.

Putin sent Trump a telegram to congratulate him on the win. In a brief statement Wednesday, the Kremlin said Putin expressed “his hope to work together for removing Russian-American relations from their crisis state” and his confidence Moscow and Washington could build a “constructive dialogue.”

screen-shot-2016-11-09-at-6-44-17-am

House Speaker Paul Ryan, seen waving to supporters at a campaign rally in Janesville, Wis., on Tuesday, has had a contentious relationship with Donald Trump, but called the Trump win ‘a repudiation of the status quo of failed liberal progressive policies.’ (Paul Sancya/The Associated Press)

Contentious relationship with his party

The Republican Party’s tortured relationship with its nominee was evident right up to the end. Former president George W. Bush and wife Laura Bush declined to back Trump, instead selecting “none of the above” when they voted for president, according to spokesman Freddy Ford.

House Speaker Paul Ryan, a reluctant Trump supporter, called the businessman earlier in the evening to congratulate him, according to a spokesperson.

Ryan called the Trump win “a repudiation of the status quo of failed liberal progressive policies.”

Democrats, as well as some Republicans, expected Trump’s unconventional candidacy would damage down-ballot races and even flip some reliably red states in the presidential race. But Trump held on to Republican territory, including in Georgia and Utah, where Clinton’s campaign confidently invested resources.

screen-shot-2016-11-09-at-6-44-27-am

A supporter of Donald Trump cheers near the intersection of West 54th Street and Fifth Avenue in New York. (Alex Wroblewski/Reuters)

Clinton asked voters to keep the White House in her party’s hands for a third straight term. She cast herself as heir to Obama’s legacy and pledged to make good on his unfinished agenda, including passing immigration legislation, tightening restrictions on guns and tweaking his signature health-care law.

But she struggled throughout the race with persistent questions about her honesty and trustworthiness. Those troubles flared anew late in the race, when FBI Director James Comey announced a review of new emails from her tenure at the State Department. On Sunday, just two days before Election Day, Comey said there was nothing in the material to warrant criminal charges against Clinton.

With files from Reuters and CBC News Report Typo

SOURCE Article