RadicalPress.com

The People’s Voice Campaign by David Icke

June 16, 2013 by admin Leave a Comment

http://www.davidicke.com/headlines/85612-important-update-about-our-peoples-voice-campaign

[Editor's Note: The Radical Press first began running ads for David Icke back in the spring of 1999 while David was touring Canada and promoting his latest book The Biggest Secret. Over the past fourteen years, through tenacity and perseverance, David has built up a world-wide following of truth-seekers intent on finding out how the world truly operates. Traveling around the world on tour after tour for well over a decade now David has created a fantastic amount of interest in topics that the mainstream media rarely, if ever, cover much of them highly political in nature.

Now David is taking on a task that could have far-reaching effects for all who have come to realize the clear and present danger that the controlled mainstream media poses to the world at large. This is where The People's Voice.tv comes in to play to give the alternative news and opinion and cultural media a distinctive voice and presence within the global media scene; one that holds great promise of proving sources of information that are truly in touch and tune with the millions of people who are sick and tired of having to gain their news of the world from sources that are complicit in its degradation and despoliation.

I strongly recommend that people with a few bucks to spare try and assist David in bringing this fantastic idea to fruition. And for those who cannot afford to donate please at least help out by passing along this information to your friends and associates. Here's a chance to make a difference that could literally change the world in a loving and positive and peaceful way. Let's go for it!]

——

David Icke writes:

As I write this we are at £139,000 with 15 days to go. What is most amazing about this figure is that it has been reached with overwhelmingly small donations from people giving what little they can.

As always, it is people who have little making the biggest contribution.

I have met many for whom the entire total that we need to launch at the level that we plan and need would be a round of drinks and they have said to me ‘I hear what you say, but what can we do?’

Well, here is what they can do – with myself and Sean taking all the risks and doing all of the work along with a dedicated team waiting to start and make this dream a reality.

I say to those for whom money is abundant and who talk about wanting to make a difference – all you have to do is contribute what you would never even begin to miss and you will answer the question ‘what can I do?’

Why should The People not have a voice with the same level of technology and communication potential as the mainstream media which denies The People a voice?

We have a fantastic team of media professionals being assembled who are willing to take this station to air for a fraction of the cost of the mainstream media, but with the same standard and quality and with truth as their goal, not corporate profit or the Establishment song sheet.

All we need is the funds to do that and we estimate this to be £300,000.

I am working for nothing and will continue to work for nothing but we need your support to make this happen on the scale that I envisage and the scale that will make the difference in global public awareness. To compete with the voice of suppression the voice of freedom must have a technological match.

The people with little who have given what they can have got us this far. Now where are those for whom a sizeable donation is nothing?

I say to those people - put up or shut up.

This is not a game. Your future and your children’s and grandchildren’s future is at stake here.

Comparatively little has been donated so far from the United States and yet the US will be be a major focus and location of our output if we can reach our goal.

CLICK HERE TO DONATE

CLICK HERE TO WATCH VIDEO: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=jwyj2yxE-gk

Remember this is not a London-based station only covering events in the UK, but a GLOBAL station broadcasting to and from every continent and a vehicle that can bring the world together no matter what the colour, creed, culture or religion.

If the world is going to be free of tyranny The People everywhere must come together in peace and with a unity of purpose. If we do, the house of cards must fall and the few will rule the many no more.

New Goals for the non-profit People’s Voice so that we can really make a difference:

£200,000 by Thursday 20th June

If we reach this goal we will invest in leasing two ‘outside broadcast’ units, one for London and the other for the U.S., that will enable us to dispatch a reporter and cameraman at a breaking news story and transmit the video back to the studio live in HD quality (using similar units that are often dispatched by the likes of Sky News and other mainstream media outlets).

Think about the recent Boston bombings or the Woolwich incident in London – with this equipment we would have been able to send our team out to these locations to find out what really happened. Interviews with eyewitnesses on the scene wouldn’t have gone through the usual media censor before reaching the public.

Please donate and share this far and wide

AT LEAST £300,000 by June 30th

Then it won’t be just be a voice, it will be a ROAR.

Come on – we can do this and the chance will almost certainly never come around again. It is time to grasp it while there is still time to grasp it.

We’ll do the work, we’ll take the risks, but we need your support to make this happen on a scale that will make the difference.

HOW BADLY DO THE PEOPLE WANT A VOICE?

CLICK HERE TO DONATE

Can You Help Us Find A Studio In London?

Email studio@thepeoplesvoice.tv if you can help us find a studio in Central London.

P.S. Some people have inquired about investing in The People’s Voice with regard to a possible financial return. But there will be no financial return because The People’s Voice is not about making money, but making a difference.

Every penny that comes in, including after we go to air, will be ‘invested’ back into the station and its output to make it bigger, better and ever more effective.

‘Investment’ in terms of The People’s Voice is an investment in freedom, peace, fairness, justice and the right to hear what we need to hear. For all our sakes.

We have 30 days from today to raise the money that will put this TV and Radio station on air within months to expose the information across multiple subjects that the mainstream media will not cover and to give a voice to the currently voiceless all over the world.

Let us put aside that which divides us and come together as One Global Human Voice – The People’s Voice.

ENOUGH – we are not taking this shit anymore

The people can have a voice that brings us together and bypasses mainstream censorship all over the world – but we need your help to make this happen within months.

Filed Under: Editor's Zone

The Israeli Criminals Behind the NSA Spy Scandal By Christopher Bollyn

June 16, 2013 by admin Leave a Comment

http://www.bollyn.com/
The Israeli Criminals Behind the NSA Spy Scandal
By Christopher Bollyn
June 13, 2013

At the center of the NSA scandal is a gang of Israeli high-tech criminals which is connected to the false-flag terror attacks of 9-11. These connections underline the involvement of the same Israeli criminals to both 9-11 and the NSA’s secret program to collect and store our personal information and conversations, which came about mainly as a consequence of 9-11.

Two Israeli companies, Narus and Verint, are involved in the National Security Agency (NSA) spy scandal in which copies of our phone calls and email data are sent to secret rooms at NSA buildings across the country. These Israeli companies are closely connected to Unit 8200, the electronic espionage unit of the Israeli military. (Narus was acquired by Boeing in 2010.)

Jacob “Kobi” Alexander

The founder and former chairman of Verint is wanted by the FBI for a long list of crimes. He is veteran Israeli intelligence officer.

Jacob “Kobi” Alexander, the former head of Comverse, the parent company of Verint, is a wanted criminal who has fled U.S. justice to Africa and probably subsequently to Israel. It is important to note that Kobi Alexander and Comverse were closely connected to Odigo, the Israeli messaging system that was used to warn Israelis to stay away from the World Trade Center on 9-11.

Furthermore, the NSA has used Israeli encryption software from RSA Security, Inc. since 2006, which means that Israelis hold the encryption keys to the entire NSA computer network. The Israelis obviously have easy access to everything at the NSA.

The following video clip is of James Bamford discussing the two Israeli companies, Narus and Verint, who are involved in the massive collection of our telephone and Internet data. Bamford was on “Democracy Now!” on October 14, 2008, discussing the role of these Israeli companies, who are closely tied to Israeli intelligence.

To have access to personal phone calls and emails allows Israeli intelligence to blackmail and control people, like General David Petraeus, who was forced to resign from his position as director of the C.I.A. after an extra-marital affair was revealed by unknown agents who had access to his personal email.

Video Link - http://youtu.be/F08-wIWTmyU

Bamford wrote an article entitled “Shady Companies With Ties to Israel Wiretap the U.S. for the NSA” for Wired.com in April 2012 in which he discussed the Israeli companies and the criminals who ran them:

In addition to constructing the Stellar Wind center, and then running the operation, secretive contractors with questionable histories and little oversight were also used to do the actual bugging of the entire U.S. telecommunications network.

According to a former Verizon employee briefed on the program, Verint, owned by Comverse Technology, taps the communication lines at Verizon, which I first reported in my book The Shadow Factory in 2008. Verint did not return a call seeking comment, while Verizon said it does not comment on such matters.

At AT&T the wiretapping rooms are powered by software and hardware from Narus, now owned by Boeing, a discovery made by AT&T whistleblower Mark Klein in 2004. Narus did not return a call seeking comment.

What is especially troubling is that both companies have had extensive ties to Israel, as well as links to that country’s intelligence service, a country with a long and aggressive history of spying on the U.S.

In fact, according to Binney, the advanced analytical and data mining software the NSA had developed for both its worldwide and international eavesdropping operations was secretly passed to Israel by a mid-level employee, apparently with close connections to the country. The employee, a technical director in the Operations Directorate, “who was a very strong supporter of Israel,” said Binney, “gave, unbeknownst to us, he gave the software that we had, doing these fast rates, to the Israelis.”

Several of the top people involved in these Israeli wiretapping companies are if fact criminals who are currently wanted for serious crimes committed in the United States, as Bamford explains in the 2012 article:

Like Narus, Verint was founded in Israel by Israelis, including Jacob “Kobi” Alexander, a former Israeli intelligence officer. Some 800 employees work for Verint, including 350 who are based in Israel, primarily working in research and development and operations, according to the Jerusalem Post. Among its products is STAR-GATE, which according to the company’s sales literature, lets “service providers … access communications on virtually any type of network, retain communication data for as long as required, and query and deliver content and data …” and was “[d]esigned to manage vast numbers of targets, concurrent sessions, call data records, and communications.”

In a rare and candid admission to Forbes, Retired Brig. Gen. Hanan Gefen, a former commander of the highly secret Unit 8200, Israel’s NSA, noted his former organization’s influence on Comverse, which owns Verint, as well as other Israeli companies that dominate the U.S. eavesdropping and surveillance market. “Take NICE, Comverse and Check Point for example, three of the largest high-tech companies, which were all directly influenced by 8200 technology,” said Gefen. “Check Point was founded by Unit alumni. Comverse’s main product, the Logger, is based on the Unit’s technology.”

According to a former chief of Unit 8200, both the veterans of the group and much of the high-tech intelligence equipment they developed are now employed in high-tech firms around the world. “Cautious estimates indicate that in the past few years,” he told a reporter for the Israeli newspaper Ha’aretz in 2000, “Unit 8200 veterans have set up some 30 to 40 high-tech companies, including 5 to 10 that were floated on Wall Street.” Referred to only as “Brigadier General B,” he added, “This correlation between serving in the intelligence Unit 8200 and starting successful high-tech companies is not coincidental: Many of the technologies in use around the world and developed in Israel were originally military technologies and were developed and improved by Unit veterans.”

Equally troubling is the issue of corruption. Kobi Alexander, the founder and former chairman of Verint, is now a fugitive, wanted by the FBI on nearly three dozen charges of fraud, theft, lying, bribery, money laundering and other crimes. And two of his top associates at Comverse, Chief Financial Officer David Kreinberg and former General Counsel William F. Sorin, were also indicted in the scheme and later pleaded guilty, with both serving time in prison and paying millions of dollars in fines and penalties.

When asked about these contractors, the NSA declined to “verify the allegations made.”

Kobi Alexander is also closely connected to the 9-11 criminal atrocity. Alexander and Comverse are connected to the Israeli Odigo messaging company through which warnings were sent to the Israelis who were expected to be at work at the World Trade Center on 9-11. As I explained in an article entitled “Why was Kobi Alexander Allowed to Flee? The Israeli Fugitive, Odigo, and the Forewarning of 9/11“ in August 2006:

The case of the Israeli criminal Kobi Alexander is like the proverbial “tip of the iceberg.” While Alexander’s crimes, through which he became immensely wealthy, are now evident, they are but a very small piece of a much larger Zionist criminal network – connected to the 9/11 terror attacks – which remains hidden beneath the surface.

Alexander, former head of the Israel-based Comverse Technology, was, until his crimes were discovered, one of the highest paid executives in the United States.

In the year 2000, for example, he reportedly earned some $102.5 million, with $93 million coming from the “exercise of options.” We now know that most of Alexander’s money was made through the fraudulent “exercise of options.”

Comverse Technology, the U.S.-based “parent company” of an older and much bigger Israel-based company with the same name, is the owner of the Verint, Ulticom, Starhome, Mercom and Startel companies. The key positions in these companies are all held by Israeli nationals.

Alexander, was recently allowed to flee the United States after he and two other former Comverse executives were charged with securities, mail and wire fraud by U.S. prosecutors in Brooklyn, New York. A warrant has been issued for his arrest…

While Alexander is obviously connected with Israel’s military intelligence apparatus and George Soros through the mutually owned investment fund ComSor, what is not widely reported is his company’s close links with Odigo, the Israeli-run instant messaging company that received – and conveyed – urgent warning messages about the imminent terror attacks on the World Trade Center, several hours before the first plane hit…

Shortly after 9-11, Odigo was completely taken over by Comverse Technology, which had been part owner of Odigo since early 2000, if not earlier. Shortly after 9/11, five executives from Comverse were reported to have profited by more than $267 million from “insider trading.”
Avner Ronen, the “founder” of Odigo, was Vice President of Business Development of Comverse Technology in October 2005. This indicates that Ronen and Alexander, both Israeli military officers with computer backgrounds, have been close business partners since early 2000.

———

Sources and Recommended Reading:

“Israelis Hold Keys to NSA/US Military Computer Networks,” by Christopher Bollyn, June 16, 2006, also published as ”Israeli Code on U.S. Government Computers” in Solving 9-11: The Original Articles, p. 157 http://rense.com/general72/sisi.htm
“Narus knows what you are doing on the network” by Om Malik, Forbes, August 11, 1999 http://www.forbes.com/1999/08/11/feat.html
“Shady Companies With Ties to Israel Wiretap the U.S. for the NSA” by James Bamford, Wired.com, April 3, 2012 http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2012/04/shady-companies-nsa/all/
“Why was Kobi Alexander Allowed to Flee? The Israeli Fugitive, Odigo, and the Forewarning of 9/11″ by Christopher Bollyn, August 24, 2006, also published as ”The Israeli Fugitive and the Forewarning of 9-11″ in Solving 9-11: The Original Articles, p. 162 http://www.bollyn.com/why-was-kobi-alexander-allowed-to-flee/

Filed Under: AT&T whistleblower Mark Klein, Christopher Bollyn, Comverse Technology, Comverse-Verint parent company, Editor's Zone, Forbes magazine, General David Petraeus, Haaretz, Inc. Israeli encryption software, Israeli company Narus, Israeli company Verint, Jacob "Kobi" Alexander, James Bamford, National Security Agency (NSA), Odigo-Israeli messaging system, Stellar Wind center

InYourFaceBook – Cyberspace Thugs Expelling Thought Criminals from Social Media by Justice4Germans

June 12, 2013 by admin Leave a Comment

[Editor's Note: It was only recently that I was speaking rather highly about Facebook and defending it against critics who were suggesting that this Jew-owned social media was anathema to real, honest freedom of speech and expression. Given the fact that I was able to publish my own articles and link to others who also were telling the truth about what's going on in the world I figured that Facebook was actually doing a great service in the pursuit of truth. That was my feeling until I recently got word that my good friend and associate who runs the Justice4Germans blogsite was permanently banned from Facebook for publishing the truth about the real history of Germany and its endless vilification in the Jew media.

Justice4Germans (J4G) was doing an excellent job of presenting the German side of the true story of the 20th Century in a very professional-like manner without any of the grossness that one sees elsewhere on the net. His efforts were well received by those who were following his posts on Facebook and I, for one, was most appreciative of his superb efforts.

Now J4G is banned permanently for presenting his research for people to read.

His story is not that much different from my own in the sense that the censorship arm of the Jewish criminal cartel that desires absolute control of all media has now successfully eliminated J4G from Facebook just as they are attempting to shut down RadicalPress.com and take away my freedom to express alternative news items. In my case of course they have employed the "justice" system to do their dirty work via the use of first sec. 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act and secondly by using sec. 319(2) of the Canadian Criminal Code. Either way, no matter how you look at it, the Jewish lobbyists and their cowardly complicit components within the Gentile society are hell-bent on shutting up all dissident voices and only permitting their own heinous propaganda to be spread around the world wide web.

As J4G explains in his fine essay below the front organization for the International B'nai Brith, the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) is, as usual, fully involved in all efforts at censorship of the Internet. Funny thing is they are also the same secretive, occult, Freemason organization that's been hounding and harassing me now since 2007.

Some things never appear to change and the Jew's psychopathic preoccupation with controlling the thoughts and ideas and opinions of the world's population is one of them. That situation is fortunately changing whether they like it or not for no group of power crazed individuals can ever gain absolute control over the Truth. The only thing necessary is for the truth seekers to continue to expose their hypocritical asses whenever they attempt to pull off their Bolshevik/Cheka Big Brother bullshit censorship agenda. Until I see Justice4Germans back on Facebook I will not be supporting this "social media" propaganda venue again.]

by Justice4Germans

“In times of universal deceit, telling the truth will be a revolutionary act.” ~ George Orwell

Welcome to the world of “Anti-Social media”! Virtual Pogroms and Cyber-Expulsions are now underway across the Internet to prevent awake and aware thought criminals and activists from socializing and sharing information, as well as, from organizing to protect themselves and their interests from global tyranny and the New World Order agenda.

Over the past few weeks, this writer has experienced Bolshevik style stalking, surveillance harassment and bullying first hand! Both my J4G Facebook profile and my personal FB profile have been the subject of continual attacks resulting several temporary blocks ranging from 12 to 24 hours, as well as repeated deletion of material and status messages that I’ve posted, on completely bogus charges of having violating their “community standards”. My posts have in no way shape or form violated these standards of conduct! The same has happened to dozens of my “Facebook friends”!

Early on Monday morning [June 11, 2013 Ed.] I was finally expelled from Facebook. My J4G account was disabled by the Cyber-Thugs and I was locked out, probably for good, based upon yet even more dangerous, ludicrous and absurd charges. I have sent them a letter of protest, though I am not holding by breath for a response nor any sort of hearing, much less a reversal of their decision. This process is entirely arbitrary and sudden. No warnings are given, no proof provided, and and no chance of rebuttal is given. They act as judge, jury and executioners, much like the Soviet Secret Police.

Here is a screenshot of what they said ….

Excuse me ??

I can assure my readers that I have NEVER posted any material or messages which promote violence or which depict, promote or condone ANY of the above, and many of my Facebook friends and followers can attest to this fact! Nor have I permitted any such comments on my “wall”. In fact, I have previously deleted and blocked well over 100 people from friends’ list due the content they shared or comments they posted on my wall which violate the FB terms and thereby put my account at risk, and in some cases, which also offended me. They are welcome to their opinions, but not within my realm, be that on Facebook or other social media, or as comments on my blog, or in such a way that puts work and reputation at risk.

So, what’s really behind this?

It is pure Soviet style censorship of the TRUTH under the guise of “antisemitism”. Sadly, most of the sheeple have been conditioned to believe that word to mean “hatred of Jews” with an implied meaning of “intention to harm Jews”. In fact, the term refers to a variety of middle-eastern languages “Semitic languages”, and not at all to “race”, much less to so-called “Jews” but who are in fact overwhelmingly “Khazars” and thus, perpetrating fraud against humanity (the Gentiles).

thefreedictionary.com says:
Se·mit·ic (s-mtk) adj.
1. Of or relating to the Semites or their languages or cultures.
2. Of, relating to, or constituting a subgroup of the Afro-Asiatic language group that includes Arabic, Hebrew, Amharic, and Aramaic.
n.
1. The Semitic languages.
2. Any one of the Semitic languages.

So, if anything really needs to be banned, it should be the use of that fully perverted word, as it’s implied meaning is a farce and used as a weapon of mass destruction , just as much as the word “Nazi” is another bogus term, as I have explained in a previous post. It is used to smear, tar and feather all those who speaks the truth about the International Bankster Gangsters or “Usury Mafia” (and who call themselves “Jews”, and are not) which run this planet, and to stifle dissent and to bully anyone who exposes how this criminal gang operates, and what their agenda really is. Other such epithets used to stifle dissent and debate include terms like “conspiracy theorist”, or when they are really desperate, they will use the word “terrorist” too demonize the truth-tellers and activists, because apparently, the truth scares them to death!

Indeed, it is all very Orwellian. Black is white, white is black. Up is down. Wrong is right. Right is wrong. And it is “in your face” now. They are not only liars, criminals and thugs, but also haters; the very thing they accuse everyone else of being.

They are engaged in “Anti-Gentilism” with an agenda to co-opt, subjugate and rule over ALL of humanity (all races, nations and cultures). And no, I am NOT talking of a “Jewish Conspiracy” but a “Criminal Conspiracy” of global proportions. Again, THEY are the ones who call themselves “Jews”, not me!. I don’t buy their BS nor use their terminology, but rather, I attempt to expose it. They are haters of truth and of truth-tellers, because they know that “THE TRUTH WILL SET YOU FREE” from their tyranny and global hegemony, and so, and as history has shown, this criminal cabal will go to any and all lengths, including inciting, causing and funding World Wars to protect their interests, or to further them. They care not how many millions of lives are lost in the process, nor how much long-term suffering is caused, and will also profit from it. They did it twice with Germany and to many other countries since, and are doing even today.

Some assert that this is a Zionist agenda and all for a rinky-dink peace of real estate in Palestine, but I don’t buy that. They already have that. These fraudsters or posers merely use IsraHell and the lessers of their Khazarian Klan as a wedge, and as a “firewall” to protect and furhter their global interests. These Bankster Gangsters could care less what happens to those of the lower caste as they have demonstrated many times in the past. Indeed, they are very happy to see the peons get the blame and to take the repercussions for their own innumerable evil deeds and “crimes against humanity”, which go on to this day, all because of “sheeple” (including self-described “Jews”) who buy into their BS and swallow it whole, or even use it to their own ends. They too need a “wake up” call, to grow a conscience, and some balls, and to start speaking the truth, as have Brother Nathaniel, Henry Makow, Benjamin Friedman, Myron Fagan and others.

Here is how they are manipulating the sheeple and social media, in addition to Law Enforcement and Alphabet Soup agencies to do their “dirty work” and do so to their OWN detriment, at their own expense, out of their own ignorance and gullibility.

“My people perish for lack of knowledge” ~ God

Facebook’s blind spot to Antisemitism

Jerusalem Post

By Internet Engagement

Internet Engagement

Monday Mar 25, 2013

Facebook’s refusal to recognize Holocaust denial as hate speech, and ban it from the social media platform, is today well known. I have monitored this and other manifestations of antisemitism on social media platforms since first exposing the problem of “Antisemitism 2.0” five years ago. Last week, however, I released a major new report [2] revealing additional blind spots in Facebook’s understanding of antisemitism. The nature of these blind spots is startling, from racist images directly based on Nazi propaganda to copies of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion. (snip)

Subtle and insidious forms of antisemitism, like the Protocols of the Elders of Zion and messages calling for the elimination of the Jewish state are (and blah, blah, blah…)

CONTINUES HERE

Enter Abe Foxman …

Huffington Post, o6.04.13

“[...]Today, while it is a marvelous medium for education, communication, entertainment and commerce, the ways in which the Internet is being used to disseminate and promote hateful and violent beliefs and attitudes are astounding, varied and continually multiplying. In an effort to look more closely at the extent of the problem — and to probe for possible solutions – I recently joined together with my longtime friend and colleague Christopher Wolf, an expert in Internet law and Chair of the Anti-Defamation League’s Civil Rights Committee, to explore these issues and to offer a blueprint for the Internet industry, the world community and societies to work together toward a solution.

The result of this collaborative effort is our new book, Viral Hate: Containing Its Spread on the Internet (Palgrave Macmillan), available in bookstores and for download to e-readers today. Facebook’s announcement that it would tighten its policies on hate speech posts in response to complaints from users about misogynistic posts, including pictures of women being beaten and messages promoting violence against women,* was the most recent reminder of the problems posed by online hate speech.

In a letter in today’s New York Times, we commend Facebook for tackling the issue head on, and will be working with them in the coming months as they see to develop new tactics to address hate speech on their pages.“

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/abraham-h-foxman/why-we-wrote-viral-hate_b_3383859.html

* that this is what Facebook has FALSELY accused me and others I know of doing!

Well, well, well. Isn’t it wonderful that these fraudsters and racketeers, who already control the media, are allowed to spew their story all over the internet too, and with mere accusations, in no time flat, can invoke the government, NGOs and Social Media sites to immediately do their bidding? And they are obviously complying too, aren’t they? It’s as if God himself has spoken to Facebook, except that, in reality it would be the Devil. And do not put it past them to be creating fake user profiles to disseminate ”fake hate” images and messages in order to justify a massive and tyrannical response either!

The truth is, Facebook is turning a blind eye to antigentilism perpetrated by frauds like YOU and others of your Khazar Klan, who are not asking, but ordering websites to cover up mass murder, genocide, theft, rape and torture being carried out by international war criminals at the behest of your Overlord Banker Buddies who own your ass. Because, and you readers can bet, that if anyone harms one hair on the head of one of their Klan it will be all over their media and the Internet, and they will not say a word about it being “offensive” content! …will they, hmmm?

And oh, in case you haven’t noticed, they HATE YOUR FREEDOM too. So use it while you can, think for yourself and stop letting them get away with this BULLYING! You can bet that all of this is going to get a whole lot worse now, unless YOU are prepared to speak up about it and will stop going along with it.

To wrap up, here is a one hour interview which also exposes the real agenda behind all this. I do NOT necessarily agree with everything said, but I invite you to listen and make up your own minds. Isn’t that what “freedom” is about?

Revolt of the Plebs Broadcast June 6, 2013

(Please click on url above image to view video)

Description: “Keith welcomes Professor Ray Goodwin of the Barnes Review to discuss ADL director Abe Foxman’s latest book, entitled Viral Hate, and the concerted efforts to censor discourse on the Internet.”

The only people who would applaud such tyranny and thought control, and who would attack your most basic right to freedom of expression are guys like this one …

“It is necessary to repeat the truth over and over again, because the falsehoods around us are also being constantly repeated, not by individuals but by the masses, in newspapers and encyclopedias, in the schools and at the universities. Everywhere, falsehood is on top, comfortable and secure in the knowledge that the majority is on its side.” ~ Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, 1828.

J4G

Filed Under: Bill C-304, Bill Whatcott, Bishop Richard Williamson, Bolsheviks, Brother Nathanael, Campaign to Silence Arthur Topham, Canadian Charter of Rights & Freedoms, Canadian Human Rights Act, Canadian Human Rights Commission, Canadian Human Rights Tribunal, Canadian Jewish Lobby, Charter of Rights & Freedoms, George Orwell, Germany Must Perish!, Guenter Deckert, Harry Abrams, Hate laws, HOLODOMOR, Jewish Banking Cartel, Jewish Censorship, Jewish Crime, Jewish Freemasons, Jewish Hatred toward Germany, Jewish Holocaust Industry, Jewish Holocaust Lie, Jewish lobbyists, Jewish Media Monopoly, Jewish Porn Industry, Jewish power, Jewish Racism, Jewish Supremacism, Jewish Talmud, Jewish Terrorists, Jews, Joseph Stalin, Justice4Germans, Khazarian Jews, Mein Kampf, National Socialism, Palestine, Pharisaic Judaism, Political Zionism, Radical Press, RealJewNews, Richard Warman, Rothschild Banking syndicate, Rothschild Zionist Criminal Cartel, Sec. 319(2) CC "Willful Promotion of Hatred", The Controversy of Zion, The Gulag Archipelago, The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, Zionism

NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden: ‘I don’t want to live in a society that does these sort of things’ – video and text

June 11, 2013 by admin Leave a Comment

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/video/2013/jun/09/nsa-whistleblower-edward-snowden-interview-video

NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden: ‘I don’t want to live in a society that does these sort of things’ – video

CLICK HERE TO WATCH VIDEO

The source behind the Guardian’s NSA files talks to Glenn Greenwald about his motives for the biggest intelligence leak in a generation

Edward Snowden: the whistleblower behind the NSA surveillance revelations

The 29-year-old source behind the biggest intelligence leak in the NSA’s history explains his motives, his uncertain future and why he never intended on hiding in the shadows

• Q&A with NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden: ‘I do not expect to see home again’

• Glenn Greenwald, Ewen MacAskill and Laura Poitras in Hong Kong

NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden: ‘I don’t want to live in a society that does these sort of things’
The individual responsible for one of the most significant leaks in US political history is Edward Snowden, a 29-year-old former technical assistant for the CIA and current employee of the defence contractor Booz Allen Hamilton. Snowden has been working at the National Security Agency for the last four years as an employee of various outside contractors, including Booz Allen and Dell.

The Guardian, after several days of interviews, is revealing his identity at his request. From the moment he decided to disclose numerous top-secret documents to the public, he was determined not to opt for the protection of anonymity. “I have no intention of hiding who I am because I know I have done nothing wrong,” he said.

Snowden will go down in history as one of America’s most consequential whistleblowers, alongside Daniel Ellsberg and Bradley Manning. He is responsible for handing over material from one of the world’s most secretive organisations – the NSA.

In a note accompanying the first set of documents he provided, he wrote: “I understand that I will be made to suffer for my actions,” but “I will be satisfied if the federation of secret law, unequal pardon and irresistible executive powers that rule the world that I love are revealed even for an instant.”

Despite his determination to be publicly unveiled, he repeatedly insisted that he wants to avoid the media spotlight. “I don’t want public attention because I don’t want the story to be about me. I want it to be about what the US government is doing.”

He does not fear the consequences of going public, he said, only that doing so will distract attention from the issues raised by his disclosures. “I know the media likes to personalise political debates, and I know the government will demonise me.”
[Read more...]

Filed Under: CIA, Edward Snowden, Free Speech on the Internet, Freedom of Expression, Freedom of Speech, Freedom of Thought, Mossad, NSA - National Security Agency, Political Zionism, The Guardian newspaper, The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion

Jesus was Palestinian and why it matters by Jehanzeb Dar

June 10, 2013 by admin 1 Comment

http://theuglytruth.wordpress.com/2011/12/20/jesus-was-palestinian-and-why-it-matters/

By Jehanzeb Dar

Because of modern alarmist reactions to the word “Palestine,” many non-Arabs and non-Muslims take offense when it is argued that Jesus was a Palestinian (peace be upon him).

Jesus’ ethnicity, skin color, and culture often accompany this conversation, but few people are willing to acknowledge the fact he was non-European. A simple stroll down the Christmas aisle will show you the dominant depiction of Jesus: a blonde-haired, blue-eyed, white man.

Islamophobia and anti-Arab propaganda have conditioned us to view Palestinians as nothing but heartless suicide bombers, “terrorists,” and “enemies of freedom and democracy.” Perpetual media vilification and demonization of Palestinians, in contrast to the glorification of Israel, obstructs us from seeing serious issues such as the Palestinian refugee crisis, the victims of Israel’s atrocious three-week assault on Gaza during the winter of 2008-2009, the tens of thousands of homeless Palestinians, and many other struggles that are constantly addressed by human rights activists around the world.

To speak from the perspective of the Palestinians, especially in casual non-Arab and non-Muslim settings, generates controversy because of the alignment between Palestinians and violent stereotypes. So, how could Jesus belong to a group of people that we’re taught to dehumanize?

When I’ve spoken to people about this, I’ve noticed the following responses: “No, Jesus was a Jew,” or “Jesus is not Muslim.” The mistake isn’t a surprise to me, but it certainly is revealing. Being a Palestinian does not mean one is Muslim or vice versa. Prior to the brutal and unjust dispossession of indigenous Palestinians during the creation of the state of Israel, the word “Palestine” was a geographic term applied to Palestinian Muslims, Palestinian Christians, and Palestinian Jews. Although most Palestinians are Muslim today, there is a significant Palestinian Christian minority who are often overlooked, especially by the mainstream Western media.

That dominant narrative not only distorts and misrepresents the Palestinian struggle as a religious conflict between “Muslims and Jews,” but consequentially pushes the lives of Palestinian Christians into “non-existence.” That is, due to the media’s reluctance to report the experiences and stories of Palestinian Christians, it isn’t a surprise when white Americans are astonished by the fact that Palestinian and Arab Christians do, in fact, exist. One could argue that the very existence of Palestinian Christians is threatening, as it disrupts the sweeping and overly-simplistic “Muslim vs. Jew” Zionist narrative. To learn about many Palestinian Christians opposing Israeli military occupation, as well as Jews who oppose the occupation, is to reveal more voices, perspectives, and complexities to a conflict that has been immensely portrayed as one-sided, anti-Palestinian, and anti-Muslim.

Church of the Nativity in Bethlehem

Yeshua (Jesus’ real Aramaic name) was born in Bethlehem, a Palestinian city in the West Bank and home to one of the largest Palestinian Christian communities. The Church of the Nativity, one of the oldest churches in the world, marks the birthplace of Jesus and is sacred to both Christians and Muslims. While tourists from the around the world visit the site, they are subject to Israeli checkpoints and roadblocks. The Israeli construction of the West Bank barrier also severely restricts travel for local Palestinians. In April of 2010, Israeli authorities barred Palestinian Christians from entering Jerusalem and visiting the Church of Holy Sepulchre during Easter. Yosef Zabaneh, a Palestinian Christian merchant in Ramallah, said: “The Israeli occupation in Gaza and the West Bank doesn’t distinguish between us, but treats all Palestinians with contempt.”

Church of the Holy Sepulchre in Jerusalem

Zabaneh’s comments allude to the persistent dehumanization of Palestinians, as well as the erasure of Palestinians, both Christians and Muslims. By constantly casting Palestinians as the villains, even the term “Palestine” becomes “evil.” There is refusal to recognize, for example, that the word “Palestine” was used as early as the 5th century BCE by the ancient Greek historian Herodotus. John Bimson, author of “The Compact Handbook of Old Testament Life,” acknowledges the objection to the use of “Palestine”:

The term ‘Palestine’ is derived from the Philistines. In the fifth century BC the Greek historian Herodotus seems to have used the term Palaistine Syria (= Philistine Syria) to refer to the whole region between Phoenicia and the Lebanon mountains in the north and Egypt in the south… Today the name “Palestine” has political overtones which many find objectionable, and for that reason some writers deliberately avoid using it. However, the alternatives are either too clumsy to be used repeatedly or else they are inaccurate when applied to certain periods, so “Palestine” remains a useful term…

Deliberately avoiding the use of the name “Palestine” not only misrepresents history, but also reinforces anti-Palestinian racism as acceptable. When one examines the argument against Jesus being a Palestinian, one detects a remarkable amount of hostility aimed at both Palestinians and Muslims. One cannot help but wonder, is there something threatening about identifying Jesus as a Palestinian? Professor Jack D. Forbes writes about Jesus’ multi-cultural and multi-ethnic environment:

When the Romans came to dominate the area, they used the name Palestine. Thus, when Yehoshu’a [Jesus] was born, he was born a Palestinian as were all of the inhabitants of the region, Jews and non-Jews. He was also a Nazarene (being born in Nazareth) and a Galilean (born in the region of Galilee)… At the time of Yehoshu’a’s birth, Palestine was inhabited by Jews-descendants of Hebrews, Canaanites, and many other Semitic peoples-and also by Phoenicians, Syrians, Greeks, and even Arabs.

Despite these facts, there are those who use the color-blind argument: “It does not matter what Jesus’ ethnicity or skin color was. It does not matter what language he spoke. Jesus is for all people, whether you’re black, white, brown, yellow, etc.” While this is a well-intentioned expression of inclusiveness and universalism, it misses the point.

When we see so many depictions of Jesus as a Euro-American white man, the ethnocentrism and race-bending needs to be called out. In respect to language, for instance, Neil Douglas-Klotz, author of “The Hidden Gospel: Decoding the Spiritual Message of the Aramaic Jesus,” emphasizes the importance of understanding that Jesus spoke Aramaic, not English, and that his words, as well as his worldview, must be understood in light of Middle Eastern language and spirituality. Douglas-Klotz provides an interesting example which reminds me of the rich depth and meaning of Arabic, Urdu, and Farsi words, especially the word for “spirit”:

Whenever a saying of Jesus refers to spirit, we must remember that he would have used an Aramaic or Hebrew word. In both of these languages, the same word stands for spirit, breath, air, and wind. So ‘Holy Spirit’ must also be ‘Holy Breath.’ The duality between spirit and body, which we often take for granted in our Western languages falls away. If Jesus made the famous statement about speaking or sinning against the Holy Spirit (for instance, in Luke 12:10), then somehow the Middle Eastern concept of breath is also involved.

Certainly, no person is superior to another based on culture, language, or skin color, but to ignore the way Jesus’ whiteness has been used to subjugate and discriminate against racial minorities in the West and many other countries is to overlook another important aspect of Jesus’ teachings: Love thy neighbor as thyself. Malcolm X wrote about white supremacists and slave-owners using Christianity to justify their “moral” and “racial superiority” over blacks. In Malcolm’s own words, “The Holy Bible in the White man’s hands and its interpretations of it have been the greatest single ideological weapon for enslaving millions of non-white human beings.” Throughout history, whether it was in Jerusalem, Spain, India, Africa, or in the Americas, white so-called “Christians” cultivated a distorted interpretation of religion that was compatible with their racist, colonialist agenda.

And here we are in the 21st century where Islamophobia (also stemming from racism because the religion of Islam gets racialized) is on the rise; where people calling themselves “Christian” fear to have a black president; where members of the KKK and anti-immigration movements behave as if Jesus were an intolerant white American racist who only spoke English despite being born in the Middle East. It is astonishing how so-called “Christians” like Ann Coulter call Muslims “rag-heads” when in actuality, Jesus himself would fit the profile of a “rag-head,” too. As would Moses, Joseph, Abraham, and the rest of the Prophets (peace be upon them all). As William Rivers Pitt writes:

The ugly truth which never even occurs to most Americans is that Jesus looked a lot more like an Iraqi, like an Afghani, like a Palestinian, like an Arab, than any of the paintings which grace the walls of American churches from sea to shining sea. This was an uncomfortable fact before September 11. After the attack, it became almost a moral imperative to put as much distance between Americans and people from the Middle East as possible. Now, to suggest that Jesus shared a genealogical heritage and physical similarity to the people sitting in dog cages down in Guantanamo is to dance along the edge of treason.

Without acknowledging Jesus as a native Middle Eastern person — a Palestinian — who spoke Aramaic — a Semitic language that is ancestral to Arabic and Hebrew — the West will continue to view Islam as a “foreign religion.” Hate crimes and discriminatory acts against Muslims, Arabs, and others who are perceived to be Muslim will persist. They will still be treated as “cultural outsiders.” Interesting enough, Christianity and Judaism are never considered “foreign religions,” despite having Middle Eastern origins, like Islam. As Douglas-Klotz insists, affirming Jesus as a native Middle Eastern person “enables Christians to understand that the mind and message” of Jesus arises from “the same earth as have the traditions of their Jewish and Muslim sisters and brothers.”

Jesus would not prefer one race or group of people over another. I believe he would condemn today’s demonization and dehumanization of the Palestinian people, as well as the misrepresentations of him that only fuel ignorance and ethnocentrism. As a Muslim, I believe Jesus was a prophet of God, and if I were to have any say about the Christmas spirit, it would be based on Jesus’ character: humility, compassion, and Love. A love in which all people, regardless of ethnicity, race, culture, religion, gender, and sexual orientation are respected and appreciated.

And in that spirit, I wish you a merry Christmas. Alaha Natarak (Aramaic: God be with you).
—–
The author blogs at Muslim Reverie. He recently wrote a chapter in “Teaching Against Islamophobia” on the demonization of Muslims and Arabs in mainstream American comics.

Filed Under: Christianity, Christians, Christmas, Church of Holy Sepulchre, Gaza, Iran, Iraq, Islam, Islamophobia, Israel, Israeli Terrorism, Israeli War Crimes, Jehanzeb Dar, Jesus Christ, Jewish Racism, Jews, Malcolm X, Nazareth, Palestine, Philistine, The Holy Bible, The Holy Qur'an, Yeshua

Topham applies for Rowbotham by Quesnel Cariboo Observer

June 9, 2013 by admin Leave a Comment

Dear Free Speech Supporters,

The June 7, 2013 weekend edition of the Quesnel Cariboo Observer featured another update on my legal battle with B’ai Brith Canada and the Queen of England.

I’m always thankful for whatever unbiased msm coverage that I do get as generally, beyond Black Press (not Conrad) which is an independent chain located here in B.C., the vast majority of the media is owned or controlled by the Jews and inevitably all that I receive from that viperous venue is more pro-Zionist, hate-filled venom.

I’ve posted the Front Page cover and a screen shot of the actual article for easier reading. Because of the nature of many online publications one cannot just go to the article in question and read and/or copy it to a text format. In the case of the QC Observer one must first buy a yearly subscription to the paper before being able to access the online digital edition. Seems pretty weird to me but that’s how they set it up.

Filed Under: "hate speech", Abrams/B'nai Brith Canada v. Arthur Topham and RadicalP, B'nai Brith Canada, BC Attorney General, BC HATE CRIME TEAM, Canadian Human Rights Act, Canadian Human Rights Commission, Canadian Human Rights Tribunal, Canadian Identity/Sovereignty, Canadian Judicial System, Canadian Rights and Freedom Bulletin, Charter of Rights & Freedoms, Crown Council Jennifer Johnston, Cst Normandie Levas BC HATE CRIME TEAM, Det-Cst Terry Wilson BC HATE CRIME TEAM, Douglas H. Christie Barrister & Solicitor, Editor's Zone, Freedom of Expression, Freedom of Thought, Harry Abrams, Internet Freedom, Jewish Lobby, Jewish Media Monopoly, Jews, Political Zionism, Quesnel Cariboo Observer, Richard Warman, Rowbotham application, Sec. 319(2) CC "Willful Promotion of Hatred", The Radical Press

Regina v The Radical Press: LEGAL UPDATE #13

May 30, 2013 by admin 2 Comments

Regina v The Radical Press: LEGAL UPDATE #13

Dear Supporters of Free Speech and a free Internet,

Tuesday, May 28th, 2013, saw the return to the Quesnel provincial court house of myself and my dear and lovely wife for yet another appearance on the charge of “willfully promoting hatred against ‘people of the Jewish religion or ethnic group’ as written in Canada’s criminal code sec. 319(2).

At this stage of the proceedings it has become virtually impossible to know what to expect beforehand when attending them. The last time I went on May 16th I was greeted with a completely new strategy by the Crown when they informed the court they had decided to go for a “direct indictment” rather than have the case unfold in a normal manner by allowing me to present evidence at a “preliminary inquiry” in order to determine whether or not the Crown actually had sufficient and viable evidence to warrant proceeding to a trial.

Crown told the court that they were awaiting a decision by the B.C. Attorney General’s office that would confirm this and that they expected it would happen prior to May 28th.

Well, as we all know about the best laid plans of mice and men, that decision by the AG’s office didn’t manifest and so the Crown told Judge Morgan that they would have to postpone that part of the proceedings until a later date at which time they fully expected that the Attorney General’s office would make up its mind one way or another.

Judge Morgan, the Honourable Judge who has been attending to my case from the beginning and who was absent on the previous court appearance, looked over the documents that were awaiting him when he entered the court room in order to get the drift of what had taken place on May 16th. He noted that I had filed an application for particularization of the Crown’s disclosure material and in perusing the document he read out excerpts to the court wherein it was stated that because of the volume of materials (over 1000 pages) presented that it was virtually impossible for me to address what specific posts on my website the Crown deemed to be “hatred”. After doing so he addressed the Crown prosecutor, Jennifer Johnston, and asked her what she had to say about it.

The Crown’s response was rather vociferous and protracted, the main thrust of the argument being that the Crown was not legally bound in any way, shape or form, to divulge to the defendant the specifics of what posts they intended to argue were the ones they felt might prove to a court of law that I was guilty of the said offence. In the words of Crown prosecutor Jennifer Johnston, ” There is no case law anywhere” that says they are bound to do so.

Crown then further worded its argument to the effect that by doing so they would be giving away to the defendant their strategies and in saying that CC Johnston then proceeded to hand to the Judge a number of photocopied pages taken off my website that referred to an online book written by Elizabeth Dilling titled, The Jewish Religion: Its Influence Today. The document that Judge Morgan was presented with first was the Forward to Dilling’s book giving an overview of her various works and her experience in dealing with the negative influences that had come to bear upon America during the course of World War II and afterwards by Zionism.

Judge Morgan quickly scanned the page and then, giving Crown counsel Johnston a rather quizzical look, asked her if this was the sort of thing that Crown was planning to present to the court as evidence?

CC Johnston then launched into a somewhat convoluted and forceful explanation bordering upon become a diatribe. She told the Judge that the article in question was an example of how the defendant’s website was presenting the writer as a credentialed and erudite researcher and writer when it fact (and this was not stated but inferred in her comments) she was really just another anti-Semitic hate monger using the excuse of communism to spread lies about the Jewish Talmud and that the Forward to her book might be compared to a sexual predator who, by sending out an email to someone online telling them about a wholesome family camping trip and inviting them to attend, by stealth and deception lures the innocent (and presumed) youth into meeting with them so they can then violate them sexually!!!

It’s at times such as these that keeping a calm, straight face in the court room becomes extremely challenging.

After her presentation Judge Morgan then stated that he could sympathize with the fact that there was such an abundance of disclosure and that I might well be overwhelmed by it. He said that he was unable to give me any legal advice but that he felt that I should consider bringing this matter up in my Rowbotham application as an illustration of why I felt it was vitally necessary to have counsel to represent me in the event of a trial.

With respect to the Rowbotham application the Judge asked me whether I had filed it and I told him that I had sent off the proper papers to the government but that I was awaiting further word as to whether or not Crown would get their “direct indictment” decision which was to have happened today. Earlier the Crown had informed the Judge of the letter which I had been sent from the legal department for the AG’s office instructing me to either file a Rowbotham application for a counsel to represent me at a preliminary inquiry or to wait and file an application in the event of a trial. I told Judge Morgan that I had gone no further with the application pending today’s appearance because I didn’t know which way the Crown was going with the case. He appeared to have no problem understanding what I was saying.

Judge Morgan then decided that it was not the time make any decisions regarding any of the matters that came up and that he would, once again, have to postpone the case to a later date when Crown felt that they would know for certain whether a direct indictment was happening or not. Crown concurred with him and suggested that they might know better by the end of June or the early part of July, 2013. At that point the Judge instructed me to go to the office next to the court room after adjournment and I would be given the exact date when I was to return.

Following his instructions to me I asked the Judge if I might speak. He gave his permission and I then told him that I wished to register a strong objection to the manner in which Crown was continually making reference to Radical Press and comparing the website to either cases of child pornography or else, as in today’s arguments, cases of sexual abuse. I told the Judge that I felt this was highly unfair and prejudicial and that there was no comparison to what I publish and what the Crown was attempting always equate with those two references. The Judge then said that my objection was registered and following that the case was adjourned to Tuesday, July 9th, 2013 at 1:30 pm.
—–

Filed Under: "hate speech", BC Attorney General, BC HATE CRIME TEAM, BC Justice Minister Shirley Bond, Child Pornography, Child Sex Abuse, Communism, Crown Council Jennifer Johnston, Elizabeth Dilling, Hate Crime laws, Honourable Justice Morgan, Jewish Lobby Groups, Jewish Porn Industry, Jewish Talmud, Jews, Political Zionism, Quesnel BC, Quesnel Court House, Radical Press Legal Update, Rowbotham application, Section 319(2) CC

The debilitating shadow of oppression by John Kaminski

May 28, 2013 by admin Leave a Comment

The debilitating shadow of oppression

WE ARE SLOWLY BEING ROBBED OF THE WILL TO LIVE

By John Kaminski
pseudoskylax@gmail.com
https://therebel.org/kaminski

How to describe it when three unexpected conversations in a row all express the same frightened frustration over a spreading sense of hopelessness that seems to be infecting everyone everywhere, and literally robbing us of the will to live?

Could there be such a thing as an epidemic of ‘failure to thrive’ disease, a phrase usually ascribed to newborns or toddlers who from lack of touch or lack of love lose interest in eating and often die from a trauma that can only be described as an overwhelming disappointment with life?

And is this now humanity’s fate based on our frustrating interactions with those who control our lives, our health, and our attitudes?

God knows there are so many examples of unsolvable negativity now that seem to defy remedies, and when answers are sought by well-meaning seekers whose brains are still actually working, all they get is a stonewall from the powers that be, using a befouled legal system to stymie simple solutions that would at least make people happy, that would at least show in some small way that the leaders we elected to protect us are at least doing that.

But that’s not what’s happening.

In the first chat, a friend in Australia puzzled over a trend in patients on the acute care ward who, despite being given the right treatment for their afflictions, were not recovering. Medical professionals who actually care — as opposed to the ones who simply push pills for cash and value yachts and Jaguars over the health of their patient victims — are at a loss for an explanation as to why these sick and injured people, receiving treatment that should make them better, are getting worse.

The second conversation was with a colleague who suffers from many of the frustrations that I do. After decades of sounding the alarm over an endless series of lies foisted on the public as official government truth, the tireless researcher Dick Eastman and I are both are punch drunk over the same unanswerable question:

“What paralyzes so many, John? Or don’t they really want to stop the crooks? Is this just a game not be taken seriously? Today, Paul Revere would be considered an entertainer. They would rate his voice. They would critique his riding style. They would peek out their window at the house next door to see if anyone was home.”

The third conversation best expressed both the frustration and fear of trusting the system that governs our lives to be of any worthwhile help to us. A friend got a spider bite which she was trying her best to ignore. “Call poison control,” I said. She did and was reassured there was nothing to worry about.

It kept getting worse. “Go to the hospital,” I said. To which she was responded: what possible help could they be? There’s nothing they could do except give me antibiotics, which wouldn’t help, plus I would have to recover from the allopathic medicine they gave me after I recover from the spider bite, and then pay the preposterous bill they would send me.

She is recovering. The body is its own best healer.

In each of these cases, there is a right answer that would solve the problem, but it is unattainable due to the conditions that have been set for us by the people who are supposed to be protecting us and caring for our health.

One traumatic atrocity after another has been put in our way, not by accident but by design, to get us to behave in a socially acceptable manner. Whether any of these manipulations are actually good for us is a question that is never really asked, except by the people who have been injured, abused, manipulated, mishandled and above all lied to by the societal systems that are supposed to keep us happy.

Why do we ever re-elect anyone? They’ve never done a good job, and are not doing one now. Yet over and over, every night on the TV news, they tell us our elected representatives are doing the best they can. And they never tell you what everybody who is not either on somebody’s big payroll or who is completely insane already knows.

They’re doing exactly the opposite of that. Like the doctors who poison you and get rich, so the politicians fleece you and get even richer. Why do we permit it? Why was 9/11 a complete failure of national defense, yet afterwards, everyone got promoted?

Latest example. Ellen Mariani was the only one among the relatives of those 3,000 Americans murdered by the false flag terror attack on 9/11 who wouldn’t take the government’s payoff to keep her mouth shut.

Martin Hill of libertyfight.com reported recently that Mrs. Mariani and her lawyer were “sanctioned” for “offensive insinuations, unmistakably anti-Semitic” against the notorious Jewish judge Alvin Hellerstein, who was involved in all those other offensive decisions letting Israelis go free to return to their “university for budding crooks” (i.e., Israel) to later appear on television and testify that they were sent to New York prior to 9/11 “to document the event”. <http://libertyfight.com/2013/911_widow_lawyer_sanctioned_for_raw_ugly_anti_semitism.html>

Hellerstein, an ardent support of pathological Israeli causes, was put in charge of all 9/11 victims cases. Christopher Bollyn wrote in 2007:

Today, he controls all 9-11 victims’ cases, as well as the lawsuits filed by the thousands of New York City workers who became seriously ill or died as a result of their exposure to the smoking rubble.

More than 6 years after 9-11, not one victim’s case has gone to trial. Hellerstein has done everything under the sun to prevent a liability trial from occurring.

And that was seven years ago.

For a U.S. court with a Jewish judge to declare a defendant out of order for noting the Jewish coverup of all aspects of the 9/11 caper is indicative of the power of Jews to conceal any crime they want under the rubric of U.S. law which they themselves have created and/or undermined, and a primary contributor of this ‘failure to thrive’ syndrome that has America and the world in its grip.

For more on Hellerstein and the criminal nature of the U.S. legal system, see http://www.bollyn.com/judge-hellersteins-unethical-connection-to-key-defendant-in-9-11-lawsuit/

But this is only one tiny incident in an avalanche of Jewish perversion of America’s so-called justice system that has people from all walks of life — not just the active exposers of Jewish perfidy down through time — in a state of wretched frustration over the failure of all Americans to correctly identify the source of their misery and distress.

Throughout the 20th century, great heroes have arisen to champion the causes of the common man. Charles Lindbergh Sr. and Jr., Henry Ford, Congressman Lewis McFadden, Huey Long, Joe McCarthy, John F. Kennedy — all of them tried to warn us about the lethal dangers of the Jewish controlled Federal Reserve, which now has Americans starving and homeless, or languishing in jail for trying to defend their evaporating freedoms. All of them, and more like them, were either buried beneath an avalanche of lies generated by a deliberately misleading Jewish media, or put in the ground after a bullet from the gun of a Jewish assassin.

Perhaps the greatest of them all wound up being silenced by both.

Like most Americans, growing up in the 1960s I was in the thrall of Jewish media, never realizing its Jewish underpinnings. Back then, George Lincoln Rockwell was a popular pariah in the pages of the Jewish press, in a society that was more concerned with drug-fueled peace demonstrations and the anarchistic allure of free love.

George Lincoln Rockwell

Such a strategy of destroying the existing social structure, distracted by the pursuit of pure pleasure as the foundations of the society of the greatest country on Earth absolutely fell apart.

Rockwell was the quintessential All-American boy, handsomer than Clark Gable, courageous Navy commander, and principled human being. Though he fought against the Germans in World War II, right afterwards he read Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf and realized how wrong he had been. By then, the Jews had captured America and gotten it to destroy Hitler’s Germany, the strongest threat ever to the centuries-old worldwide Jewish financial hegemony.

By the late 1960s, thanks to the Jewish press, Rockwell had become the most infamous man in America, as the founder and driving force behind the American Nazi Party. It seems now, at this late date, that he is exactly the man needed for the job of stopping this unwilling slide of humanity into a Jewish-made sewer of totalitarian sadism.

Take a moment and read this short sketch of who George Lincoln Rockwell really was, and try in vain to guess who today even approaches his stature in terms of courage, common sense and devotion to truth. <http://greatwhitedesert.org/dir/index.php?title=Who_Was_George_Lincoln_Rockwell%3F>

And if you like that, try his short autobiography <http://jrbooksonline.com/PDF_Books/This_Time_the_World.pdf> and scan for ideas you might utilize in this never-ending battle against the Jewish parasites who are killing the world.

Then compare these sentiments and slogans against the recent pronouncements of our esteemed vice president, the evil toadie Joe Biden, as he praised Jewish contributions to our society that have made America what it is today.

And what a mess it is.

Biden lauded the Jewish role in the promotion of diversity, whose unrestrained immigration policies have driven the nation into bankruptcy, chaos and overloaded prisons. He praised the liberation of homosexuals, which has destroyed the American family structure, and the Jewish influence on universities, which has completely obscured legitimate history as well as muddled the sciences with an overloaded emphasis on war making activities.

Biden went out of his way to praise by name Einstein and Salk, who gave us the most deadly technologies the world has ever known. And he called all these things “good”.

Compared to George Lincoln Rockwell, Joe Biden is a simpering wimp, beholden to the puppet masters who have no plan at all other than making all the non Jewish countries of the world into their own kosher playthings, and killing as many people as possible, just as they did in the Soviet Union, because they love the taste of blood, especially on Jewish holidays.

No one ever got a case of suicidal malaise listening to George Lincoln Rockwell as they do listening to Joe Biden. Above all, Rockwell was not afraid, and neither should you be. It’s a far better idea give your life for the world you hoped it would be than have it taken from you in a world that never was.

And best of all, fighting for what is right is the surest cure I know for losing the will to live because of what is wrong.

And still the morose morons moan: “What’re we going to do? They have all the guns and all the food!

Well, Jim Stone gave me a great idea the other day when he wrote about cellphone towers containing far more electrical potential than they need to transmit phone calls. I won’t say anything more about this except to say I don’t believe in violence AGAINST ANY LIVING THINGS (except ants, wasps and cockroaches).

Other ideas? Never use Facebook. It’s a recruitment registry for the FEMA camps.

Corporations, especially the food producers, are poisoning the world. Do whatever you can to screw up their production, and support your local farmer; in fact, become one yourself. Ever since I stopped eating out I’m feeling much better. At least patronize your local veggie stands and don’t forget to eat what you buy. Remember, corn and wheat are pretty much indigestible today. Eliminating them from your diet guarantees you’ll have to see a doctor much less frequently for the rest of your life.

Never watch TV. Don’t stay on your computer or other electronic device when you can be telling your neighbors what the hell is really going on.

Vote (if you feel the need to vote at all) all incumbents out of office, and demand of all new candidates for any office support a new investigation of 9/11, because the old one was so obviously a pack of lies.

But I don’t want to give you too many ideas lest I crimp your own imagination. Look within for ideas you know need to be implemented. And then implement them. Be creative, and subtle. Don’t confront people you know can hurt you down the line. Gather information and destroy them later.

Do not be afraid to speak to anyone about anything. Always remember that it’s your world, not theirs. If you are afraid to offend family members who won’t stop watching TV, tell them you feel sorry for them for not trying to save their own lives.

Do any or all of these things on a regular basis and you won’t have worry about losing the will to live, because you’ll be too busy fighting. And know for sure that in order to stay alive, you have to fight, and fight preferably for what is right, because if you fight for what is wrong, you won’t last long. Just ask a U.S. soldier.

——-

https://therebel.org/kaminski
http://johnkaminski.info/
http://www.rudemacedon.ca/kaminski/kam-index.html
http://web.archive.org/web/20040323232319/http://johnkaminski.com/

Filed Under: 911, 911/WorldTradeCenter, Christopher Bollyn, Editor's Zone, George Lincoln Rockwell, Henry Ford, Sr., John Kaminski, Joseph R. McCarthy

The B.C. Election, May 14, 2013. A National Tragedy. by Robin Mathews

May 24, 2013 by admin Leave a Comment

The B.C. Election, May 14, 2013. A National Tragedy.

By Robin Mathews

May 23, 2013

Begin at the beginning. The power figures at the centre of the B.C. New Democratic Party and the major, experienced MLAs in the legislature sold out the people of British Columbia, and Canada. That is the beginning and the end of the election story.

Other commentary may provide interesting footnotes. For instance: that the polls did it. The Green Party did it. The outside strategists did it. The propaganda, financing and organization of the neo-liberal campaign did it. Dix’s pipeline flip-flop in mid campaign did it. The big corporations did it. Christy Clark’s avid campaigning did it. Her endless willingness to lie did it. The Mainstream Press and Media’s flat-out campaigning for the Liberals did it. The morally obese voters who wouldn’t go out and vote did it. No.

The New Democratic Party leadership and powerful backroom dealers sold out the people of British Columbia and Canada, betraying (1) the principles of declared NDP political philosophy (2) the fundamentals of political opposition (3) and simple human decency. They turned their backs on British Columbians in order to collaborate with neo-liberalism, even criminal neo-liberalism.

Two distinguished women I am acquainted with, involved in public matters, were, earlier, approached to be NDP candidates. Both said they would have had to agree to have no independent ideas and to express no matter publicly that was not approved by the backroom dealers. As one put it – not until she had undergone a complete prefrontal lobotomy would she be considered an acceptable NDP candidate. The two women graciously declined to be stuffed replicas of Moe Sihota, of Carol James, of Jim Sinclair – president of the B.C. Federation of Labour. That policy of ‘cookie-cutter candidates’ says much about the almost total failure of the NDP to grapple with the most important issues in British Columbia in the last 12 years.

Almost all the top and most important actors in the B.C. NDP have been (literally or figuratively) collaborating with the Campbellclark Liberals – even before the NDP lost power. Ujjal Dosangh was rumoured to be negotiating to enter the Liberal Party even as he was the leader of the B.C. NDP. A perfect symbol ….

After the vicious, manufactured attacks on the Glen Clark NDP conducted by the RCMP, the Courts, the Media, and the Campbellclark forces, Joy MacPhail and Jenny Kwan did heroic and outstanding work as a matchless team in Opposition.

But the NDP intelligentsia and its core powerful didn’t launch a major, organized, sustained attack to expose the dirty, lawless actions of the RCMP, the Courts, the Media, and the Campbellclark Right against the Glen Clark NDP – and to assure that fraudulent behavior became history. The NDP core powerful and intelligentsia – and many British Columbians – accepted the Reactionary smear as history. As if it is something to have to apologize for.

[Read more...]

Filed Under: Editor's Zone, NDP, Robin Mathews

Eighty Years of Infamy by Arthur Topham

May 22, 2013 by admin 3 Comments

“This dynamic volume [Germany Must Perish!] outlines a comprehensive plan for the extinction of the German nation and the total eradication from the earth, of all her people.”

“It is a definite obligation which the world owes to those who struggled and died against the German yesterday, and to those who are fighting him again today, as it is the bounden duty of the present generation to those yet unborn, to make certain that the vicious fangs of the German serpent shall never strike again. And since the venom of those fangs derives its fatal poison not from within the body, but from the war-soul of the German, nothing else would assure humanity safety and security but that that war-soul be forever expunged, and the diseased carcass which harbors it forever removed from this world. There is no longer any alternative: Germany Must Perish!”
~ Theodore N. Kaufman, Germany Must Perish!, Argyle Press, Newark, New Jersey, 1941

On Thursday, March 23rd, 1933 the newly democratically elected Chancellor of Germany Adolf Hitler and his cabinet, in a vote taken in the Kroll Opera House in Berlin by the Reichstag on proposed legislation known as the Enabling Act – the “Law for Removing the Distress of People and Reich,” were given a four year mandate to rule Germany, unrestrained by Parliament. The vote, when taken, was: 441 for and 84 against.

On Friday, March 24th, 1933 one day after this historic event, world Jewry openly declared war on Germany.

Thus was set the stage upon which Germany and the world at large would be continually forced to bear witness to world Jewry’s endless and psychopathic vengeful obsession with their ongoing campaign of vitriolic lies, racism and HATRED toward the German people and the German nation.

2013 marks the 80th anniversary of this planned strategy of intentional conditioning of generation upon generation of western civilization’s citizens to fear, loathe and despise first and foremost the National Socialist Party of Germany (termed “NAZI” by the Jew media), its leader Adolf Hitler and then, by extrapolation, the German people as a whole.

After eight decades of defamation and endless slurring it begs the question as to why world Jewry would continue to, as the saying goes, flog a dead horse over and over and over again? To what (or whose) advantage is is to constantly harken back nearly a century in order to reinforce what is now, thanks to the tireless efforts of historical revisionists, evidently the most profoundly provocative and colossal LIE ever foisted upon the world?

A day never passes when the so-called “mainstream media (msm)” doesn’t make mention of either Adolf Hitler or the Nazi’s or the purported “Jewish Holocaust”. Relentless and hard-hearted as the tax man or the bill collector the Jew-controlled msm, like the ancient Mariner in Coleridge’s famed poem, holds the general pubic’s attention hostage with its “glittering (tv) eye” while spinning out its slanderous tales of endless misery and woe and persecution, all of which is maliciously and willfully designed to shore up a deceit that is now unravelling before the world thanks to the miracle of the Internet.

Only those born before 1933 could honestly say that they lived in a period of history when libel of Germany wasn’t an all-pervasive reality and the numbers of people living today who are of that age and still conscious of their former world are few and far between.

Those of us born after world Jewry’s 1933 declaration have all been subjected to the unceasing assault on the German nation that still persists today.

It was writers like Theodore N. Kaufmann, quoted above, who spear-headed the intentional promotion of HATRED toward Germany prior to America’s involvement in a war that Hitler and the German nation never wanted and never were guilty of causing. Kaufmann and world Jewry’s aim was to change the attitude of the American people; one that was then either neutral or pro-German rather than anti and twist the truth about Hitler and the National Socialist government and their amazing accomplishments from 1933 until 1939. And so his hate-filled screed titled German Must Perish! was promoted by the most prestigious msm publications in the USA when it appeared in 1941 prior to America’s entry into the conflict. Magazines like Time and newspapers like the New York Times and the Washington Post lauded the idea of absolutely destroying the German nation and the German race as a whole referring to the grotesquely contemptible concept as a “SENSATIONAL IDEA!”

Once world Jewry was successful in dragging the USA into the war via their choreographed “Pearl Harbour” maneuver all stops were pulled out and the vicious denigration of Hitler and Germany began in earnest never to abate even to this day.

Canadian children growing up during the war years were subjected to all the anti-German hatred propaganda that was carried in the media. Images of Hitler and the “Nazis” were ever-present and for all the German Canadian citizens throughout the nation the devastating effect of such vile and systematic psychic abuse worked its way into the minds and subconscious of those who, prior to world Jewry’s intensions, had been respected members of Canadian society.

When the war finally culminated in a victory for Soviet Communism, world Jewry and so-called western “democracy” in 1945 one would think that soon thereafter the hatred and vilification of the German people would have slowly wound down but that was not to be the case.

In January of 1943 the Allied powers met to sign the Protocol of the Yalta Conference.It was then that U.S. president Franklin D. Roosevelt first articulated the policy of “Unconditional Surrender”, a demand that the Axis powers yield to the Allies without concessions or negotiations. It was Douglas Reed in his 1956 book The Controversy of Zion, who stated in Chapter 42 of his book aptly titled ‘The Talmudic Vengeance’, that it was an act of “blind vengeance” which meant that “the enemy would not be granted peace at any price whatever, and this was the absolute reversal of all “principles” previously proclaimed by the Western leaders….

“Thus at Casablanca in 1943 the decision to wreak vengeance was first taken. This was the background to the “Morgenthau Plan” of September 1944 (obviously first devised in Moscow, then drafted by Mr. Harry Dexter White for his superior, then forwarded by Mr. Morgenthau to Mr. Roosevelt, who with Mr. Churchill initialled it), the spirit of which pervaded the Yalta Conference and its Protocol. Mr. Roosevelt’s later expression of astonishment (“he had no idea how he could have initialled this”) and Mr. Churchill’s words of regret (“I had not time to examine the Morgenthau Plan in detail … I am sorry I put my initials to it”) are both voided by the fact that both then signed the Yalta document, its child and the charter of vengeance.”

No sooner had the Yalta Protocol been signed than the propaganda machines in Canada started churning out their deceptive misinformation regarding what this Protocal truly meant for the German nation.

After world Jewry achieved their “unconditional surrender” of Germany (thanks to Roosevelt and Churchill), and the Bolshevik Communists were victorious in gaining full hegemony over all of eastern Europe including Poland and half of Germany then came the next phase of hate animosity toward the German people as the Jews, aided and abetted by their Marxist/Communist compatriots, began to reveal their quintessential ‘ace-up-the-sleeve’ scheme of blaming Hitler and the National Socialists and Germany itself with having “holocausted” 6 million Jews during the three year period when anti-German collaborators had been placed in work camps throughout eastern Europe.

It was an old ruse that had been attempted numerous time before throughout the early part of the 20 century but now that world Jewry was able to conspire with Stalin and their Communist counterpart and fabricate false and incriminating “evidence” of such a deed the picture changed dramatically. Using the moral abomination called the Nuremberg Trials, a pseudo-legal process not unlike that of the Canadian Human Rights Commission and its attendant Tribunal, where truth is no defence, the victors, via torture, terror and trauma, were able to force “confessions” out of former German military leaders that was then cultivated into fields of propaganda which yielded an endless supply of an adulterated diet of falsehoods for generations to come.

Reed also tells us that by 1945 world Jewry’s U.S. propaganda “hate” wing, the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai Brith was already carrying out “a high-powered educational program, geared to reach every man, woman and child” in America through the press, radio, advertising, children’s comic books and school books, lectures, films, “churches” and trade unions. This program included “219 broadcasts a day”, full-page advertisements in 397 newspapers, poster advertising in 130 cities, and “persuasions” subtly incorporated in the printed matter on blotters, matchbox covers, and envelopes. The entire national press (“1900 dailies with a 43,000,000 circulation”) and the provincial, Negro, foreign-language and labour newspapers were kept supplied with, “and used”, its material in the form of “news, background material, cartoons and comic strips”. In addition, the A.D.L. in 1945 distributed “more than 330,000 copies of important books carrying our message to libraries and other institutions”, furnished authors with “material and complete ideas”, and circulated nine million pamphlets “all tailored to fit the audiences to which they are directed”. It found “comic books” to be a particularly effective way of reaching the minds of young people, soldiers, sailors and airmen, and circulated “millions of copies” of propaganda in this form. Its organization consisted of the national headquarters, public relations committees in 150 cities, eleven regional offices, and “2,000 key men in 1,000 cities”.

Constantly beating and pushing their hate-filled anti-Semitic drums, world Jewry’s unremitting mind control operations have carried on right up to the present with book after book and magazine article after magazine article and newspaper clipping after newspaper clipping eulogizing the “6 Million” and lying through their teeth about mythical “Nazi” atrocities in Germany’s “death camps”.

Pulp fiction propaganda such as that depicted in the graphics below are typical of the Jewish publishing houses and reflect their psychotic obsession with publishing HATRED toward the German people.

Recently I was in a book shop perusing the shelves when I spotted the following title “Hitler’s Daughter.” I couldn’t believe my eyes. Upon looking at the book I realized that it had been published by Scholastic Books the famed publisher of children’s literature.

When the Jew say there’s “no business like Shoah [holocaust. Ed.] business,” the lesson truly sinks home when one considers the depth of depravity that they will sink to in order to brainwash future generations into believing their insane paradigm of opprobrium against the German people.

The Final Solution

The triumph of world Jewry over the past eighty years is something to behold. Since 1933 they have worked overtime in an all out effort to flush Germany down the shit hole of history. In the process millions of otherwise sincere and honest individuals have been slowly and steadily insidiously conditioned into believing lies of such a magnitude that only now, after ten decades of deception are they finally beginning to lose their grip over the minds of the masses as the Internet and dedicated historical revisionists continue to make headway in their dismantling of the myths of the 20th century that have perpetuated a degree of HATRED never before witnessed on such a global scale.

Any such force willing and capable of deceiving the world on such a gargantuan scale is obviously not unaware of what has been taking place since the advent of the net, email and social media sites such as Facebook where these topics are slowly permeating and drawing more and more attention. The sense of desperation and panic on the part of world Jewry is palpable. If a person has been studying these events over the past quarter century or longer they can taste it in the rarefied air of cyberspace with each passing day. The pillars are beginning to shake and the deceivers are in a mode of defence that they’ve never had to contend with for a very long time. What to do? How do we stop the sheeple from becoming informed of our Great Deception and becoming aware and concerned people?

Those who have been controlling the historic dialogue since 1933 have always displayed one trait – the fervent need to CONTROL the non-Jewish gentiles (or goyim/cattle as they are wont to refer to the rest of the world’s population). Laws must be enacted to prevent the Truth from getting out and the overall population eventually realizing to what degree they have been lied to all their lives. Laws? What sort of laws could possibly prevent the people from debriefing themselves at this advanced stage of the game? Why HATE LAWS! Laws that will penalize and imprison those who are exposing our planned program of global deception. Laws that will make Truth an invalid, useless reason to speak out against the infamy. Laws that will make any factual evidence irrelevant. Laws that will make it a crime just to DENY that world Jewry’s interpretation of history might possibly be skewed and biased in favour of their own New World Order agenda for global dominance. Laws that will prevent the population from coming to the only plausible and reasonable conclusion that makes common sense, that being, the creators of the HATE LAWS are the very same folks who have been spreading universal HATRED toward the German people for the past eighty years. In other words Hate Laws for the haters and prison and fines and censorship for the Truth seekers of the world who are now on to their scam. Oi veh! what can you say?

Well, given my own predicament and the fact that I have been under extreme attack by world Jewry myself for over six years now, I have pondered this question again and again and finally a solution that appears to be almost self-evident now that it came to my mind has arisen.

When the Jewish lobby groups here in Canada who have been instigating and pushing their “HATE LAWS” realized some years ago that sec. 13(1) of the Canadian Human Rights Act was actually a double-edged sword and some Muslim groups had the unmitigated audacity to turn these same laws upon the Jews they quickly began an all out effort to have sec. 13 of the Act removed from the statutes*. What that exercise illustrated was that any such “HATE” law, be it in the domain of the Human Rights Commissions or the Criminal Code of Canada is amenable to all Canadians, not just the Jewish lobbies. Thus the obvious answer to the goyim’s woes.

It’s time for Canadians of Germanic descent to stand up and take the bull by the horns and stop simply accepting their fate as victims of world Jewry’s program of hatred and instead become pro-active and utilize these same laws in their own defence. It’s time to stop retreating and time to go on the offensive. Time to reach out and grasp the sword of Truth, pick it up and begin to wield it, challenging the haters by applying the same hate crime laws to the actual perpetrators.

Let us fill our courtrooms around the nation with Section 319(2) “HATE CRIME” complaints against every Jewish person and Jewish media conglomerate and Jewish publishing house that has been spewing forth their vitriolic hatred against the German people for the past eighty years. Let us see how they like it when THEIR freedoms and their “rights” to defame and slander the German people are suddenly challenged from every quarter. Let us see how our federal government likes it when they have to investigate and act upon each and every legitimate grievance that the German people of Canada have to offer them in the way of injustice, prejudice and discrimination to their ethnic community. And let us see how the Jewish-controlled msm reacts to this unprecedented move by ethnic German Canadians who finally say to the government and to the world ENOUGH!

Prologue

I am certain that somewhere beyond this third rock from the Sun there must be a place of peace and truth where honesty and love prevail and children grow up free of mental conditioning so they can spend their productive adult lives doing positive and life-enhancing things that make them happy and joyful and fill their hearts with laughter. In such a place I imagine is where Adolf Hitler now resides watching over his people awaiting the day when their great sacrifices of 1939 to 1945 will eventually be vindicated and along with that vindication will come the release of the rest of the world from the restraints and the deception that have been imposed upon us all.

God be with us all.

———–

* At the moment it is sitting in the Senate awaiting final reading and approval by the Conservative government of Canada.

The Radical Press would like to pay a special thank you to Mr. Ian V. Macdonald for granting permission to use three of the Star Weekly front page illustrations from his superb book “Star Weekly at War” in this article.

Filed Under: "hate speech", "Jewish" holocaust, 6 Million Myth, Abrams/B'nai Brith Canada v. Arthur Topham and RadicalP, AdelaideInstitute.org, Adolf Hitler, American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), Anti-Defamation League (ADL), Anti-ZionistCanada Yahoo Group, B'nai Brith Canada, B'nai Brith International, BC HATE CRIMES TEAM, Bill C-304, CAFE - Canadian Association for Free Expression, Campaign to Silence Arthur Topham, Canada-Israel security pact, Canadian Arab Federation, Canadian Association for Freedom of Speech (CAFE), Canadian Charter of Rights & Freedoms, Canadian Council for Israel and Jewish Advocacy (CIJA), Canadian Free Speech League, Canadian Human Rights Act, Canadian Human Rights Commission, Canadian Human Rights Tribunal, Canadian Identity/Sovereignty, Canadian Jewish Congress, Canadian Jewish Defense League, Canadian Jewish Lobby, Canadian Judicial System, Canadian Rights and Freedom Bulletin, Canadian Senate, Canadian Sovereignty, Chabad Lubavich Cult, Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Christianity, Christians, Conservative Party of Canada, Cst Normandie Levas BC HATE CRIME TEAM, Deir Yassin massacre, Det-Cst Terry Wilson BC HATE CRIME TEAM, Dresden Holocaust, Editor's Zone, Ernst Zundel, Eustice Mullins, F.D. Roosevelt, Fredrick Toben, Free Speech on the Internet, Freedom of Expression, Freedom of Speech, Freedom of Thought, Freedom to Protest, FreeDominion.ca, Gaza, GentileDefenseLeague.org, Gentiles, Germany, Germany Must Perish!, Guenter Deckert, Hans Krampe, Harry Abrams, Harry Dexter White, Hate Crime laws, Henry Morgenthau junior, HOLODOMOR, Internet Freedom, Islam, Israel, Israeli Terrorism, Israeli War Crimes, Jewish Censorship, Jewish Defense League (JDL), Jewish Hatred, Jewish Hatred toward Germany, Jewish Holocaust Industry, Jewish Holocaust Lie, Jewish Lobby, Jewish Media Monopoly, Jewish power, Jewish Racism, Jewish Supremacism, Jewish Talmudists, Jewish Terrorists, Jews, Jews Behind Bolshevik Revolution, Josef Stalin, Judaism, Karl Marx, Kol Nidre oath, League for Human Rights of B'nai Brith Canada, London Declaration on Combating Anti-Semitism., Marc Lemire, Mein Kampf, National Socialism (NAZI), New York Times, Nuremberg Trials, Old Testament, Paul Fromm (CAFE), Pharisaic Judaism, Political Zionism, Prime Minister Stephen Harper, Radical Press, RadicalPress Free Speech Defense Fund, RCMP Corruption, Rev. Stephen Boissoin, Richard Warman, Rothschild Zionist Criminal Cartel, Sec. 319(2) CC "Willful Promotion of Hatred", Section 13/CHR Act, Soviet Bolshevism, Sylvia Stolz, Talmudic Pharisees, The Babylonian Talmud, The Bible, The Controversy of Zion, The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, THE ZUNDEL TRIAL & FREE SPEECH, Ukrainian Holocaust, Washington Post, World Jewry, World Zionist Organization

The Missing Word by John Kaminski

May 20, 2013 by admin Leave a Comment

The Missing Word

FAILURE TO USE IT DESTROYED THE WORLD

By John Kaminski
pseudoskylax@gmail.com
https://therebel.org/kaminski

Finely dressed wordsmiths who pretend to be the hippest, most intelligent, most popular, most thorough, most insightful writers on the planet are still sticking to the same program that got us into all this trouble in the first place. And the schizzed out public is marching right along with them, investigating every nook and cranny of sadistic corporate perfidy and still coming up with the wrong answer. Why is that? Why won’t anybody name the perps? It’s so obvious. How can everyone not know? And if they do know, why won’t they say it?

Is it simply the corporate mindlock, as evidenced by Google and YouTube, where anybody who names the Jews and their worldwide crime syndicate is automatically filtered out by the kosher censors who own these so-called services? We’ve certainly seen plenty of evidence of this over the last decade, although it seems to be becoming more subtle, now that Jews themselves have pretty much taken over the opposition, so pseudo celebrities like Carl Bernstein can come right out and say it, and still people still don’t pay attention to it because it causes them too much discomfort to have to reassess everything they’ve learned in their lives. Jews can occasionally be candid about Jews, whereas non Jews are not allowed to, which is, in fact, why the opposition has always been going nowhere fast.

When a Jew comes right out and says the neocon war machine is a strictly Jewish operation, as Watergate reporter Bernstein did, he’s feted as a free speech hero, but when a non Jew says it (as many of us have been doing for years, if not decades), he’s regarded as a conspiratorial nut bag and thrown into jail or financially ruined for life, if not something much worse.

Is it fear? Lots of people who had something important to say have wound up suddenly dead over the past few years. Decades. Centuries (remember Warren Harding?). Yet the Jew-S government can come right out and pretended it’s not financing the overthrow of the nation of Syria (after not financing the overthrows of Libya, Iraq, Afghanistan etc.), and people nod their heads approvingly when mind controller Richard Falk goes to the Mideast to “assess the situation” and “try to restart the peace process”, a contention that should induce widespread projectile vomiting, but instead people who should know Jewish scams better than this continue to take demonic vaudeville acts like this seriously.

It’s almost as if the past is being evaporated right out of brains, sucked right out through our ears by the vacuum cleaner of television news, which never once in a hundred years has ever mentioned that the Jewish takeover of the world started 400 years ago when Cromwell let the Jews back into England to start a worldwide war machine that has never stopped killing since. They’ve also never mentioned that both World Wars and the take down of the World Trade Center were accomplished by the Jews who control the United States.

Is it because of the indoctrination of a phony educational system that has been constructed by kosher perverts who teach middle school students the art of lesbian kissing and trumpet the exploits of the now-dead Seal Team 6 for murdering a man who had been dead for a dozen years? A Hollywood film on this theme actually won the best picture Oscar THIS YEAR. How’s that for mass mind control? It makes you wonder what our children are going to do to us when they find out what we’ve been saying. If the poison vaccines don’t get them, then the TV news surely will, but because of what they have been told to believe, they’ll probably kill us first before they keel over prematurely.

Is it fear of violating hate crime laws, created by cynical proponents of the greatest hate crime of all time, which is the Jewish Talmud, an encyclopedia of perversion that commands the murder and robbery of all the non Jews of the world, lasciviously lusts after sex with children, and teaches its adherents how to lie about everything and then defends the practice with its annual Kol Nidre oath, making it a sacred act to lie about the crimes they commit. Notice how none of those ever charged with hate crimes are the New York newspapers detailing how insane the Muslims are, or slick perverted Jewish artists laughing about how stupid the Christians are for protesting images of their messiah being immersed in a jar of urine.

These are heinous hate crimes, but the Jews are never charged with them because Jews wrote the laws and Jews control the courts.

When Jews do it, it’s legitimate social criticism; when non Jews do it, it’s a hate crime.

As wily Jews infiltrate the principled groups that oppose them, they offer up all sorts of synonyms to camouflage themselves from responsibility for their crimes. The most popular of these nicknames are Communists and Zionists, but no Jew can ever explain why all these same crimes committed prior to the invention of these words are the same as the crimes they are committing now.

So why can’t people who know the score safely use the word Jew in a critical sense in public?

Is is patriotism? Certainly not. Because of the Patriot Act, actual patriotism has now been classified as a subversive activity, subject to indefinite detention, false charges and the confiscation of all your property. The current definition of patriotism, according to every member of the U.S. Congress, is that it is a treasonable offense. Yes, in case you hadn’t noticed, reality HAS been flipped on its head.

Is it poisoned food, fluoride sedation, radiation deterioration and television comedies that tell you they’re funny though they’re not.

Or is it simply a case of wanting to keep your job, because all the jobs in America, at some level, are owned by Jews?

People haven’t realized yet that there aren’t any jobs anymore, or least none in which you can save your soul and maintain your employment.

Doctors going bankrupt, teachers committing suicide, unemployed garbage men from the ghettos getting large sums of money for testifying that, yes! they saw that man plant a bomb along the parade route. And that man, which could be you, never saw it coming, although he did get interviewed by the feds in the recent past, and because he was a loyal citizen, he of course agreed to help them out if called upon.

After all, there IS one occupation that is growing in America, and the U.S. government has lots of openings for it. That job is corpses — utilized in one of an infinite number of public relations stunts, which are the false flag mass murder massacres to further some devious objective to take away what few remaining rights we have left. You can either be a collateral damage deceased bystander, or a suddenly famous psycho assassin without ever having to know how to use a gun or a bomb.

It’s horrifying to see people read the newspapers these days, at least those who can still read. They go right to the help wanted section, then to the commercial flyers, and only as they get ready to throw it in the trash to they happen to notice an actual news story or two. And their reaction is always the same — nothing we can do about that; that’s the way things work; might as well forget about since there’s nothing we can do about it. Shoot, Qaddafi probably deserved to die that way since Obama said he was such a bad guy. This is the way Americans are these days. Totally brain dead and physically dying.

Most people get their news these days from YouTubes created by people with coded names, or directly from TV commercials, tailored to tweak their inner compulsions. You can see in the deliberately grubby men and pustulish painted women with guns, all looking to make a big score with no thought of tomorrow’s testosterone tragedies. What counts is the wallpaper, and the lamps, and the computer games, and maybe the blowup pool in the backyard.

It has been frequently said that the future will consist of only prisoners and guards, but usually they forget to mention witnesses, who are hired for any occasion and then disposed of when the objective is achieved. This is the fate of all U.S. military personnel, who are now prevented from owning guns because they followed those homicidal orders and accepted those poisoned vaccines so they are obviously insane and therefore should not be allowed to own guns.

They are going to be among the occupants of all these new prisons and concentration camps that have been built to house — and process! — those who simply won’t go along with the plan, who won’t get with the program. These facilities have no bathrooms, no kitchens, no beds and no chairs. You, then, tell me what the program is.

All of this has happened because all those finely dressed wordsmiths who are so proud of their media exposure and their highly hyped reputations have consistently and universally failed to use the magic word, the word that most accurately describes the nearly invisible force that is poised, after centuries of assiduous planning, to completely destroy society as we know it and the world as we hoped it would be.

And even at this late date, you still demur; you still refrain from using the word that will be the cause of death of everything you know and love. Perhaps you will wait until you can no longer utter an honest protest, or even think an honest thought. If you’re lucky, that time will come in the camps, if you make it that far.

Do you plan on making your big protest when it is clear to you that you will never have another bite of food to eat, never have another dollar in your pocket, or never have another moment of comfortable sleep? What do you think your protest will accomplish then? Surely, it will be much less effective that what it can accomplish now.

Remember, all of this has happened because you failed to use the magic word, and configured your plans to erase that word from the memory of man.

But because you didn’t — because you didn’t want to hamper your career prospects, or offend your neighbors, or violate your religious rules — the certainty now is that you and your loved ones are the “useless eaters” who are about to be erased.

————

John Kaminski is a writer who lives on the Gulf Coast of Florida, constantly trying to figure out why we are destroying ourselves, and pinpointing a corrupt belief system as the engine of our demise. Solely dependent on contributions from readers, please support his work by mail:
6871 Willow Creek Circle #103, North Port FL 34287 USA.
https://therebel.org/kaminski
http://johnkaminski.info/
http://www.rudemacedon.ca/kaminski/kam-index.html
http://web.archive.org/web/20040323232319/http://johnkaminski.com/

Filed Under: Editor's Zone, Jesus Christ, Jewish Crime, Jewish Defense League (JDL), Jewish Hatred, Jewish Hatred toward Germany, Jewish Holocaust Industry, Jewish Holocaust Lie, Jewish Israeli Settlers, Jewish Lobby, Jewish Media Monopoly, Jewish Porn Industry, Jewish power, Jewish Racism, Jewish Supremacism, Jewish Talmudists, Jewish Terrorists, Jews, Jews Behind Bolshevik Revolution, John Kaminski, Kol Nidre oath, Oliver Cromwell, Patriot Act, Political Zionism

Did We Think … We Canadians? by Robin Mathews

May 19, 2013 by admin Leave a Comment

Did We Think … We Canadians?

by
Robin Mathews
rmathews@telus.net

Did we think, Canadians, we’d be permitted Canada without fighting for it day by day, hour by hour – as if we were unlike people all over the rest of the world? Did we think we could live in, possess, own, develop, and share the country fairly for the good of all – without fighting against the greedy, the brutal, the corrupt day by day, hour by hour?

That was, for a very long time, the rhetoric we heard and spoke and believed here in Canada. And now the rhetoric is being torn from us by forces more crude and destructive and devious and psychopathic and brutal than any of us could have imagined even a decade ago. Call the forces ‘Harperism’, neo-liberalism, U.S. Imperialism, ‘Chinese expansionism’, ‘the One Per Cent’, corporate fascism – they are all correct in their ways.

They are, in short, forces that are willing to brutalize populations, to desecrate economic stability world-wide, and to (literally) destroy the environment (and the planet) in their blind and all-consuming greed. (Think, merely, of Stephen Harper and his clown clones on the subject of climate change!)

Protestors and bystanders cordoned off by two lines of riot police in downtown Toronto during G8/G20 Summit.

What has changed in our time is that local oppression of the population in “advanced” countries is now globally rearranged by “outsourcing” to ‘slave economies’, by air power (and electronic surveillance) used to police populations, by ‘tax haven’ locations to hide wealth in trillions of dollars, by the destruction of unions in the “advanced” countries, by the normalization of “precarious” employment, and by the wholesale purchase of political systems – like the ownership of the increasingly lawless Stephen Harper group by ‘the one per cent’.

The “outsourced” disaster that killed more than 1100 workers in Dahka, Bangladesh, thousands of miles away, under the new imperial system, is the new normal. At the height of the last, the British empire, savaging of working people was more local … and the ‘normal’.

In the 50th year of Queen Victoria’s reign (1887) the famous “Bloody Sunday” happened in and around Trafalgar Square in London. British workers were so brutalized by violent capitalism– to the point of widespread starvation – that a movement to change had begun. Dahka, Bangladesh was then in Leeds and Manchester and Hull and Bradford – in fact, all over England.

Bloody Sunday, Trafalgar Square, London England 1887

George Bernard Shaw (playwright) and Willliam Morris (poet, furniture designer, editor, utopian novelist, wall-paper designer, etc.) were supporters of the oppressed, present at “Bloody Sunday”. William Morris called himself a Socialist and a communist. Shaw was a parliamentary, gradualist socialist (a “Fabian”).

What is compelling about “Bloody Sunday” is its similarity to famous demonstrations in the last fifteen years, its almost rubber-stamp similarity. Nothing has changed in 125 years! Think of the G20 (so-called) ‘riots’ in Toronto in 2010. The ‘organized’ opposition groups (critics of capitalism) included unions, anti-poverty people, Council of Canadians, Native Rights supporters, environmental activists, Oxfam, etc. They were met by more than 20,000 police/security personnel. At least one officer said orders came from Ottawa. Police violence was obvious. Fake “Anarchist” provocateurs were almost certainly employed. Arrests of the innocent were wholesale.

G20 summit protestors being repelled by Toronto riot police as they approached the security perimeter.

At “Bloody Sunday” (125 years before) a surprising number of police showed up, too. E. P. Thompson [William Morris, 1955, 1977, pp. 485-502] reports “the police were deliberately provoking [protesters] into an insurrectionary temper”. William Morris saw the mounted police with “batons” (clubs). Other witnesses recorded lavish police brutality. Morris recorded “the complicity of almost the entire capitalist Press”. And he saw “the treachery of the professed advocates of freedom in Parliament and public life”.

Witnesses wrote of charges laid against demonstrators backed by perjured evidence. Fake Anarchists were said to be in the crowd, and before the gathering George Bernard Shaw wrote jokingly of “those fervid orators who preserve friendly relations with the police” and suggest London be set on fire … and worse.

But the character of “Bloody Sunday” was no joke. Shaw fled, saying a friend “found me paralysed with terror….”

That was more than 125 years ago. Dahka, Bangladesh was local. Nothing has changed in the class forces arrayed against each other – or in the tactics used to continue the system of looting and oppression of ordinary people. What has changed is the character and size of the landscape. (The North American corporations raping Bangladesh are considering changes … until the story blows over. Then they will proceed as before … supported by their unlegislating governments who are in bed with the oppression and inhumanity).

Dahka, Bangladesh

125 years ago senior politicians didn’t take responsibility for the organized police attacks on demonstrators seeking justice in Trafalgar Square. In Toronto in 2010, police were alleged to have made the choices they received as orders from above.

Characteristically, Stephen Harper has stayed as far from the discussion of the Bangladesh deaths as possible since he supports the system of ‘outsourcing oppression’ on behalf of the one per cent. He is owned by the one per cent. His role is to keep power in order to keep serving the one per cent. All else is secondary to winning the class war.

Self-explanatory

By the same token, his hand in the G20 violence was carefully disguised (while his present Minister of Foreign Affairs and his present Treasury Board head were draining $50 million from public moneys for pork-barreling – for which, it seems, he promoted them both.) Lying, deceit, cover-up, election fraud, fake contracting, union harassment, active repression of democratic freedoms form the basis of Harperite policy: in order to serve the one per cent.

Stephen Harper’s hand in the 2006 election fraud – we may allege – was disguised, as it was in the 2011 Robocall election fraud. As it is in the $90,000.00 payment made by his chief of staff Nigel Wright to senator Mike Duffy (who was deep, deep in election work for the Harperites – collecting expenses, some suggest, more than once from sources illegitimately billed).

The question has to be “was Nigel Wright directed by Stephen Harper to pay Mike Duffy a ‘free gift’ of $90,000.00 so that the public could be prevented from seeing the depth of corruption involved in Conservative Party electioneering and party pay-offs?” How much is Harper’s hand present in the PMO’s refusal to make public the records it has of Duffy’s paid activities? And was Duffy instructed by Harper to keep the records secret? He said so, didn’t he?

Still peaceful the Saturday’s rally heads down Spadina Avenue in Toronto’s Chinatown neighbourhood.

We know that poor Stephen Harper was ‘confused’ when he named costs for the F35 fighter plane that were proved to be ridiculously false. Every time an independent auditor reviewed F35 costs, the Harperites were proved to have given seriously incorrect figures. (To have lied?)

Harper learned from that fiasco to pass the buck as often as possible. But, then, desperate to get Peter Penashue elected in Labrador after his exposure for hugely violating spending limits in the 2011 Robocalls Election, Stephen Harper called violator Penashue “the best member of Parliament Labrador has ever had”. Consistent with his deceitful ways – Harper said he would let the people of Labrador make their own choice … as he sent in his ‘unmanned drone” Peter MacKay to tell Labradorians that if they would re-elect Peter Penashue he would be guaranteed a cabinet seat. The bribery didn’t work. Penashue lost.

That takes us to the incredible Arctic Patrol Ships fiasco right now in white heat. Briefly (comparing it to the F35 fiasco), experts can’t believe the cost of design alone. What should cost, one says, $10 to $15 million is set to cost $288 million. God only knows what the cost of actual construction might be. Other countries have bought or built similar vessels for around $100 million completed!

Strangely, after the CBC/Terry Milewski coverage of the contract, Irving Shipbuilding took a full-page ad in select newspapers to counter it. The countering, I believe, is not credible, but big-push public relations. What is going on? I suggest it is corporation/government interpenetration. Or put another way, neo-liberal government paying off a neo-liberal corporation – to buy solidarity and get favours come 2015 and the next election.

The apparently inexplicable, incredible contracting is perfectly clear, I believe. The purpose of the one per cent, of the neo-liberal ideology, of the Harperite world view, of corporate fascism is to transfer the wealth belonging to the population to the dominant class and to further the interpenetration of corporations and government. As that proceeds, the population is increasingly impoverished, oppressed, and robbed on behalf of ‘the one per cent’.

When the Canadian people get that message and begin to organize protest in really meaningful ways, the ‘security forces’ riding horseback with clubs, on motorcycles with tear gas and rubber bullets, in Anarchist outfits to provoke violence, will be there to stage another “Bloody Sunday”, another G20 “riot”. At that point – if it hasn’t happened before that point – Canadians are going to have to know if they don’t fight for the country and go on fighting for it until they defeat the Harperites completely, once and for all, their democracy will be finished. Canada will become another slave economy, and Canadians will be the slaves. We didn’t think … we Canadians … that it would come to this. But it has.
———-

Filed Under: Bangladesh, Canadian Sovereignty, Editor's Zone, G20, Political Zionism, Prime Minister Stephen Harper, Robin Mathews, “Bloody Sunday”

Surviving the avalanche by John Kaminski

May 17, 2013 by admin Leave a Comment

Surviving the avalanche

DO YOU SLEEP SOUNDLY KNOWING COPS

MAY BREAK DOWN YOUR DOOR AT ANY TIME?

By John Kaminski

pseudoskylax@gmail.com

https://therebel.org/kaminski

Which thing keeps you awake at night? Which disaster that you can’t do anything about do you choose to worry about?

Seeing your money evaporating before your eyes? Wondering why your child was killed by friendly fire? Hoping what they say about methane isn’t true, and likely to end all life on this planet in just a few short years?

It makes you feel truly patriotic when you realize the cops can break down your door at any time for any reason and take your life, doesn’t it?

When you finally fall asleep tonight, will you dream of being tazed to death on a Tennessee interstate? Of a drug-addicted doctor amputating the wrong leg? Or of a drunken judge declaring you a terrorist and ordering a Thorazine injection so that you will never recognize yourself again, like Jose Padilla?

The threats to our continuing survival, our everyday health, and our chances for happiness are so overwhelming, so ubiquitous and so in-your-face every moment of every day, that without some kind of stimulant, some kind of sedative or at least some kind of sheep-counting meaningless distraction mechanism, chances are you’re like more and more people these days — lying there staring at the ceiling praying for a good dream to take you away from this nightmare reality.

And it isn’t so much the panic-inducing threats to your continuing existence that keep you from reaching that balmy sanctuary of sleep. Really, it’s the agony of not knowing what to do about any of these atrocities. Stress like this causes cancer, and worse.

People are committing suicide in record numbers, especially in the military <http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/01/14/16510852-military-suicide-rate-hit-record-high-in-2012?lite>.

For most people who can think with a modicum of functionality, the worst of it is the lies, the betrayals, and the deliberate deceptions that everybody — and I mean everybody — encounters on a daily, if not hourly, basis.

And the worst of those come from our authority figures, the people in whom we place our trust and around whom we attempt to structure our lives. An epidemic of mistrust and lack of faith in our so-called leaders has not only shattered our sleep, but forced us to assess our futures in terms of hours and days rather than years and decades.

Yet, there are faint signs that a revolution is under way. A massive outcry in support of the Second Amendment forced the Congress to derail President Obama’s cynical gun grab.

Even more auspicious are the legislative movements in various states rejecting the Obama’s pathological contentions that he can kill anyone he wants any time he wants. In Missouri, as one example, both legislative houses voted overwhelmingly — with a veto-proof majority — to tell Obama’s police state goons to go to hell by commanding all state and local cops to not enforce unconstitutional federal gun control laws.<http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2013/05/missouri-legislature-nullifies-all-federal-gun-control-measures-by-a-veto-proof-majority/> Similar efforts are under way inTexas, Wyoming, Missouri, Oklahoma, Tennessee and Iowa.

Maybe the biggest slap in the face of the American people in recent memory (although it’s hard to rank them; there have been so many) came from the mealy mouth of Al Gore, recent vice-president and smug Nobel Prize winner, who said he knew all about chemtrails and how bad they were for everyone, when the official government policy practiced by criminal politicians across America was that chemtrails don’t really exist — they’re just tinfoil hat conspiracy theories. <http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=SrrWXurroWw>

After being misguided and abused by the lies of paid-off politicians throughout our lifetimes, here’s an example of the reward we get for our dedicated patriotic support of the demonic forces that control our country.

The mother of a Seal Team 6 member (you remember Seal Team 6, the ones who supposedly assassinated Osama bin Laden ten years after he died of kidney disease, and then supposedly dumped his body in the Indian Ocean) spoke of suspicious circumstances in her son’s death. This was their reward — a government set-up to get rid of them so they couldn’t talk about the scam. Listen to her outraged description of her dead son’s funeral. <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gafqJ6YMl6c&feature=youtube_gdata_player>

In her words, “It is now time to change things I can’t accept.”

Seal Team 6 has just about been completely wiped out. <http://www.gopusa.com/news/2013/05/13/families-of-seal-team-6-demand-answers/>.

The latest episode of this apparent attempt to silence everyone involved with the fake murder of the already-dead Al-Qaida honcho involves Hillary Clinton, with the story resurfacing that she was injured in a secret jet crash in Iran, and the pilot of which was Job B. Price, none other than the leader of Seal Team 6 whom the government claimed committed suicide in Afghanistan. <http://jhaines6.wordpress.com/2013/05/11/what-really-happened-to-hilary-clinton-and-us-navy-seal-commander-job-w-price-republished-modified-by-peter-eyre-may-10-2013/>

Then there is also the latest story that no U.S. military personnel witnessed the supposed burial at sea of Osama bin Laden.<http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2236617/Revealed-Military-emails-NO-U-S-sailors-witnessed-Osama-bin-Ladens-secret-burial-sea.html>

As your head spins while you try to go to sleep, you realize that the general condition of the American population at this time is best reflected by a growing trend in Ohio putting people in jail for not being able to pay their debts, including one man sent to jail repeatedly for not paying fines for not leashing his dog. <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z41YRgFll3A> The time he spent in jail caused him to lose his job, which meant he couldn’t pay his fines, and kept going back to jail as the money he owed kept growing.

What to do about this growing onslaught?

What remains the best weapon to use against this avalanche of homegrown tyranny was compiled by the late great American patriot William Cooper, who was assassinated by county sheriffs in Nevada as he was gearing up to deconstruct the 9/11 caper back in 2001.

In his meticulous history of the income tax, he revealed that the Internal Revenue Service is illegally constituted and most people are not required to pay income taxes. If you read this document carefully — and, as Cooper says, memorize the chronology he has so diligently assembled — you can successfully defend yourself against this quintessential federal tyranny that has duped the Americans for a century into paying money to the war machine that they legally don’t have to pay.

This may be the best way to put the federal government tyrants out of business.

According to Cooper, citizens of the 50 United States have never been required to file or pay “income taxes”. Read the sorry history of a law that was never passed, and smell the stench of typical government scams like phony wars for billionaires that impoverish most Americans, or parents put in jail for homeschooling or refusing vaccinations that still wreak today. <http://www.usa-the-republic.com/revenue/BATF-IRS%20Criminal%20Report.html>.

Study it carefully. The day will come, if it is not already here, when this knowledge will become supremely important.

Can anybody say “Tax Strike”!? This would be the ultimate no-confidence vote. We can’t count on the politicians to do it, so the people must.

But nowadays, the IRS scam is a relatively minor lie compared to the giant lies of 9/11, the bogus wars, the genetically modified foods and the geoengineering that are poisoning the world, and purchase of ammunition by every department of the government in preparation for a shootout with the American people, whose guns continue to be taken away.

In addition, when you know some of these things and your head hits the pillow at bedtime, there can be no sleep without serious nightmares about your future.

Sooner or later you can only come to one conclusion. That it’s time to fight the criminal traitors who pretend to be our leaders, but who only steal our money, our property and our lives.

There is only one answer. Be who you always dreamed you’d be, who you always wanted to be: defender of hope, arbiter of truth, rescuer of the oppressed, and guilt-free preacher of all that is right and true. Do not accept the lies that ruin your life. If you’re going to die anyway, you might as well check out being the principled hero you always hoped to be, fighting the greatest evil civilization has ever known — the United States government.

The time has come to oppose every single thing the government — the corrupt Obama-Bush machine — orders us to do, by any means necessary.

Of course, if you choose that path, you have a few hard questions to answer.

Like, why do you remain silent about 9/11, the inside job that triggered this cynical neocon war against the world which does not benefit average Americans but only the international bankers who buy our local politicians to help them steal our money. Why haven’t you confronted every public official you can find, and demand that he resign and be tried for treason, for covering up the fact that our own government mass-murdered thousands of its own people to promote a sinister political objective?

Or, why do you remain silent while the government approves poison food that makes everyone sick, poison medicines that are put on the market without mandated clinical trials to prove they’re safe, or puts the clamps on radiation news about the radical rise brain-damaging births among California babies that guarantee the retardation of America’s next generation.

If you think you can escape the consequences of these demonic trends, you’re a fool and an idiot, not to mention a traitor.

The principal threat to world peace and our future survival is our own government in Washington. It’s time for the masses to sweep them from power and into jail where they belong.

It must be done before they shut down the money supply, start World War Three, or gas the population, because then the game will really be over. And since they’ve already started all three projects — the deliberate evaporation of the currency, the war against everyone in the world, and the chemtrail pollution of the atmosphere — you’re running just a little bit late about deciding what to do.

Sleep tight. And sweet dreams.

I hope you survive the avalanche, because many people — many millions of people — won’t.

———-

https://therebel.org/kaminski

http://johnkaminski.info/

http://www.rudemacedon.ca/kaminski/kam-index.html

http://web.archive.org/web/20040323232319/http://johnkaminski.com/

Filed Under: 911, 911/WorldTradeCenter, Editor's Zone, John Kaminski, Osama bin Laden, Seal Team 6, William Cooper

Radical Press: Legal Update #12 by Arthur Topham

May 16, 2013 by admin 2 Comments

May 16th, 2013

Dear Free Speech Advocates and Radical Press Supporters,

Today, May 16th, 2013, marks the first anniversary of my arrest and incarceration last May 16th, 2012 when Det. Cst. Terry Wilson and the BC “Hate Crime Team” flew up from Vancouver and along with a crew of approximately 14 police officers, stopped my vehicle containing myself and my wife while on route to Prince George on a business trip and charged me under the criminal code of Canada with a sec. 319(2) “Hate Crime”. I was read my rights, arrested, handcuffed and carted off to the Quesnel jail where I spend the rest of the day in a cell while Det. Wilson’s team awaited an illegal search warrant and then entered my home and stole all of my computers and electronic files as well as my firearms which are my only means of defense well outside of any RCMP range of immediate help in case of an emergency.

Coincidentally today was also the latest in a protracted series of court appearances that began back on October 9th, 2012. Today’s menu of misfeasance included a new item that suddenly popped up when I was supposed to be appearing before the provincial judge to discuss my last application to the court requesting particularization of the disclosure material submitted by the Crown. Those who have been following these legal updates will be aware of what that was all about and for anyone new interested in finding out they can go to Legal Update #11 at the following url and review it there. That application plus setting a date for a preliminary inquiry and an update on my Rowbotham application were all scheduled for the 16th. For some unknown reason Judge Morgan who normally hears my case was unable to be there and another out of town female judge was sitting in for him.

The judge, after looking over the menu, decided that she would not attempt to deal with the application for particularization and told the Crown that she would postpone that until May 28th, 2013 when Judge Morgan would be in attendance as he had been dealing with it and knew much more about the case. Seeing that I was without counsel the judge, having looked at my Rowbotham application and noted that it had all be prepared properly and had been accepted, then took the time to explain to me how and why the Rowbotham application works and when a person can file one. For obvious reasons I knew how it worked as I had already prepared the document awhile go but I stood quietly and listened to her review the process. She then explained that if I wished to have counsel prior to the planned preliminary inquiry that I would have to apply beforehand but that if, after the preliminary enquiry, it was determined that the case would proceed to trial then I would have to file a second Rowbotham application in order to obtain another counsel to represent me in the trial.

I had received a package of material from the Ministry of Justice Legal Services Branch on May 11th in response to my Notice of Application and Affidavit which I had served on the AGBC April 23, 2013. In it Keith Evans, legal counsel for the Attorney General of British Columbia (AGBC), explained all the details of how to go about filling in the additionally required documents related to the application and also informing me that I would have to decide beforehand whether or not I wished to have the application relate to obtaining counsel for the preliminary inquiry or the pending trial or both. If both then I would have to submit two separate applications.

At this point I asked the honourable judge if I might ask her a question and she consented. I wanted clarification as to the primary purpose of holding a preliminary inquiry and I asked the judge if, in fact, the preliminary inquiry was meant to determine whether or not the Crown had a strong enough case to warrant going to trial. She answered in the affirmative saying yes, that was the main reason for conducting such a procedure. I said thank you for explaining that.

It was around this point in the proceedings that Crown counsel Jennifer Johnston brought up the new item mentioned earlier. She informed the judge that she had just recently received word from Det. Wilson’s “E-Division” office in Surrey, B.C. that additional information had gathered and was being sent to Crown and that the Attorney General’s office was now planning to take the unusual step of attempting to circumvent my right to a preliminary inquiry by going for what the Crown termed “a Direct Indictment”; a process by which I would be forced to go to trial without having the opportunity to argue against the Crown’s charges as laid out in the original Indictment of November 5th, 2012.

Crown counsel Johnston then informed the judge that no final decision had been made as of today but that she expected the Attorney General’s office would have their final decree in place prior to the next court appearance this coming May 28th, 2013. At this point Cst. Wilson was sending the additional disclosure to Crown via a thumb drive or memory stick and that I would also be receiving a copy of whatever new “evidence” they had come up with in their “ongoing investigation”.

All that covered the judge then looked at me. I gave her a sort of dazed and confused look and she, half-smiling and half-laughing, apologized for all the apparent incertitude and then did her best to provide me with a general overview of what had transpired, ended by saying that everything would be postponed until the return of Judge Morgan on May 28th, 2013.

—–

[Editorial comment: The new item of going for a Direct Indictment on the part of the Attorney General's office still remains a mystery to me at this point. They are obviously not happy with my wanting to have a preliminary enquiry which is standard procedure in most cases. They are also planning to introduce additional evidence or information into the case. Where would that evidence come from? One can only assume that it comes from whatever additional posts I have been making on the RadicalPress.com website. Why additional evidence in the first place? Didn't they feel they had enough already?

Feedback on these issues is always appreciated.

As Walt Disney used to say at the end of his productions, "Stay Tune Folks!"]

For Justice and Freedom of Speech for Everyone Everywhere,

Arthur Topham
Publisher & Editor
The Radical Press
“Digging to the root of the issues since 1998″

———

PLEASE NOTE: More than ever, now that my former lawyer Douglas Christie has died, I am dependent upon financial help to carry on.

The struggle to retain our inherent right to freedom of speech doesn’t come without costs both financially and otherwise. Out of necessity, I am forced to ask for financial assistance in this ongoing battle with the foreign Zionist lobbyist/censors who are determined to stop all freedom of expression in Canada.

Being a ‘Senior Citizen’ on a very limited pension and having now been denied assistance by Legal Aid services here in B.C. I’m left in the unenviable position of having to rely solely upon donations from supporters to pay my legal and related expenses.

I would ask readers to give serious consideration to helping out by either sending a donation via PayPal using either a PayPal account or a credit card or else sending a cheque or Money Order or cash to me via snail mail at the following postal address. Please don’t make the cheque out to “RadicalPress” as that account is no longer available to me.

Arthur Topham
4633 Barkerville Highway
Quesnel, B.C
Canada
V2J 6T8

To access my PayPal button please go to either the Home Page at http://www.radicalpress.com or my blog http://www.quesnelcariboosentinel.com The PayPal button is up on the right hand corner of the Home Page on either site. Feel free to click on it.

For Freedom of Speech, Justice for All,

Sincerely,

Arthur Topham
Pub/Ed
The Radical Press

Filed Under: BC HATE CRIME TEAM, Crown Council Jennifer Johnston, Cst Normandie Levas BC HATE CRIME TEAM, Det-Cst Terry Wilson BC HATE CRIME TEAM, Direct Indictment, Douglas H. Christie, Harry Abrams, Hate Crime laws, Legal Update, Richard Warman, Rowbotham application, Sec. 319(2) CC "Willful Promotion of Hatred"

Statement of Roy Arthur Topham regarding his Arrest on May 16th, 2012 on the charge of “Willful promotion of hatred CC 319(2)”

May 16, 2013 by admin Leave a Comment

ARREST STATEMENT OF ROY ARTHUR TOPHAM
REGARDING HIS ARREST AND INCARCERATION BY THE RCMP ON
WEDNESDAY, MAY 16TH, 2012 IN QUESNEL, B.C. ON THE CHARGE OF:

“Willful Promotion of Hatred CC 319(2)”

Posted May 16th, 2013 on 1st Anniversary of this Event

Arthur Topham

[Editor's Note: In the interests of freedom of speech and freedom of the Internet I am posting my "Arrest Statement" which my former lawyer Mr. Douglas Christie advised me to write soon after my arrest on May 16th, 2012. His wise counsel was that this case would likely drag on in the courts for years and by the time it came to trial (should such an event arise) that many of the details of my recollection of that fateful day would by then be hazy and doubtful. Acting on Mr. Christie's advice I wrote out a detailed description of what took place that May morning last year. It's an interesting picture of what can happen to you here in Canada should the Jewish lobby decide they don't like being criticized. Read. Heed. And please pass it on to your friends and associates. ~Arthur Topham]

On Wednesday, May 16th, 2012 I started out my work day travelling out to my mining property on the 2400 Rd off the Barkerville Hwy to meet up with the Petro Canada fuel truck at 9:30 a.m. I was having the company fuel truck filled with 1200 gallons of diesel fuel for use during the upcoming placer mining operations for this season. When that was completed I returned home to my residence at 4633 Barkerville Hwy and prepared for a trip up to Prince George where I had to go to the Richie Bros. Auctioneers site to pick up some mining equipment that my business associate had recently purchased at an auction on May 10th. My business partner and wife, Shastah Topham, came along with me and we left our home at approximately 11:00 a.m. heading west toward Quesnel.

Plans had also been made ahead of time to meet another mining associate at Princess Auto in Prince George at 1 p.m. and between the two of us we would haul equipment back to my placer claims on the 2400 Road.

Due to the fact that the Petro Canada fuel truck was a bit late in arriving at the site plus the additional time necessary to fuel the 1200 gallon truck I was running behind schedule by about half an hour.

We were travelling in a 2009 Chev pickup owned by my mining associate with whom I am presently in a Joint Venture Agreement.

When one leaves my property at 4633 Barkerville Hwy you must turn right on to the Barkerville Hwy in order to travel toward Quesnel and Hwy 97 the route necessary to travel in order to get to Prince George. The section of Hwy 26 (Barkerville Hwy) that runs past my residence stretches in a straight line for approximately 1 km. As soon as I pulled out on to the road I immediately saw that there was a white pickup truck sitting adjacent to the eastbound lane of highway just before the road descended down a small dip and passes Cottonwood Historic Site.

As we drove toward it I remarked to my wife, “There’s the cops sitting there. Looks like they’re either waiting to catch Willie again or maybe they’re doing surveillance on Don Carter’s property. Don Carter has been experiencing ongoing harassment by the Canadian Revenue Agency over the past few years and has also had numerous encounters with the RCMP in conjunction with the CRA.

As we approached the white pickup we could see two men in dark clothing sitting in it trying to look as unobtrusive as possible. Again I said to my wife, “If we weren’t running so damn late I’d stop and asked them if they were lost or needed any assistance.”

As we crested the dip and passed Cottonwood Historic Site I noted that within a minute or so the white pickup was now following us. I asked my wife is she was buckled up (she was) and then I set my vehicle on cruise control at about 95 cpm. The limit was 90 kph so I knew that at least if the cops were going to stop me they wouldn’t have the excuse that I was speeding.

As we proceeded on toward Quesnel Shastah was spoon-feeding me my breakfast as I drove because we were too late for me to sit down at home and eat before leaving. I remarked to my wife that the cops were likely watching us through their binoculars and wondering what she was doing. We also were discussing the vehicle that was now so obviously tailing us. It’s always a joke for the locals around Cottonwood when the police come and try to set up either a surveillance vehicle or radar to catch unwary speeders. The cops never seem to understand that when you live in a very small, tight-knit community that everyone in the area is very aware of who drives what type of vehicle and when they see a vehicle parked on the side of the highway with people sitting in it they know right away that they’re either broke down or else cops.

We continued along the highway talking about cops and related issues until we reached the top of 11 Mile Hill. When one begins to descend you are overlooking the Fraser Valley viewshed and can see westward for over a hundred kilometres. About half way down I noted that a regular white coloured RCMP van with the usual bells and whistles was now directly behind the white pickup. At the same time, due to the steep grade of the hill, I was also watching my own speedometer to make sure I didn’t begin coasting beyond the 100 km speed limit. As we neared the bottom of the hill the RCMP van’s lights came on. I told Shastah and proceeded to slow down and pull over on the right hand side of the highway just where the road levelled off.

Who are the original creators of “Hate Crimes” and Hate Crime laws? by Arthur Topham

May 15, 2013 by admin 3 Comments

Dear Readers and Free Speech Advocates,

I’m writing on the eve of the first anniversary of my arrest and incarceration last May 16th, 2012 by the B.C. “Hate Crime Team” when I was charged under sec. 319(2) of the criminal code of Canada with the crime of “willfully promoting hatred against ‘people of the Jewish religion or ethnic group.’”

The two complaints that led to my being charged under this specious act were laid against me by Harry Abrams of B’nai Brith Canada and Richard Warman, the serial complainant in numerous other cases involving “hate crimes” and the sycophantic toadie of the Jewish lobby here in Canada

Since that time I’ve been immersed in a legal battle with the B.C. courts because of this trumped-up charge.

On May 16th I must again appear in court to deal with more matters related to my current attempts to find myself a new legal counsel to assist me in having this spurious charge tossed out and the case dismissed. I will be providing a further legal update following tomorrow’s events but for now I wish to remind readers once again of just who the real purveyors of so-called “hate” truly are and how long they’ve been carrying on this charade in order to cover up their own actions over the past century and longer.

One of the biggest beefs that both these two charlatans had with my website, which subsequently became perfectly clear to me when the arresting officer Det. Cpl. Terry Wilson was talking to me while I was in jail, (and which I subsequently noted in my Arrest Statement to my former lawyer, Doug Christie) was the issue of an article that I had posted on my site dealing with the 1941 book Germany Must Perish! by Theodore N. Kaufmann.

I had written a satirical parody of Kaufmann’s book back in May of 2011 and titled it “Israel Must Perish!” and took some of the more juicy, hate-filled quotations out of it and substituted the words “Nazi” and “Germany” and “Hitler” and a few other German words with synonymous Jewish words like “Jews” and “Israel” and “Netanyahu”, etc. in order to highlight the hypocrisy of the Jews in daring to accuse the western world of being eternal haters of the poor, downtrodden Jews throughout history.

Somewhere, in the shallowness of their conniving, degenerate minds, they figured that this parody/satire would somehow stand up in a court of law and prove to the world that I, rather than them, was the real disseminator of so-called “hatred” and ought to be treated like a common criminal, found guilty, tossed into jail, and to have my rights and freedoms as a Canadian citizen removed from me.

For the record I want readers to know about this classic of Jewish hate literature and thus I’m republishing here my Introduction to the original article plus the url to the original book of Kaufmann’s so that people can go and look at the abhorrent mind that first created this ugly and obscene proposal for the complete and total annihilation of the German people.

What readers must also realize is what is printed on the back cover of Kaufmann’s book as shown in the graphic below. Three of most revered U.S. publications still operating today, and all Jewish owned, were promoting Kaufmann’s book back in 1941 in order to turn the American public away from decency, justice and truth and twist their perceptions of Germany and Adolf Hitler into the same grotesque mindset that conjured up this classic demonic-inspired book; one openly advocating the total extinction of the German people.

And these are the same folks who are desperately trying to subvert every democratic nation in the world into obeying their “hate crime” legislation that they’ve surreptitiously slipped into the statutes of former free nations via lobbying and pressuring and intimidating politicians of every stripe.

Now that folks is what I call chutzpah.

Please try to pass this article on to every free speech lover that you can. The Canadian public and the world at large needs to know just who the real, originators of these “hate crime” laws are.

Arthur Topham

Publisher/Editor

The Radical Press.

———————-

The Book that Hitler Fears

Germany Must Perish!

by Theodore N. Kaufman

Newark, N.J., Argyle press

RadicalPress Editor’s Introduction [from original post]:

Seventy-two years have now passed since Theodore N. Kaufman published his infamous, hate-infused book, Germany Must Perish! Over the course of these last seven decades the Zionist Jews have been working relentlessly to create in every democratic nation so-called “Human Rights” legislation that would contain special sections dealing with “hate crimes,” the type of which they themselves obviously had perfected back before the USA had even entered WWII.

Here in Canada, in the mid-1970s, the Jewish lobby began in earnest their surreptitious efforts to silence Canadians by working through Ontario’s then Deputy Attorney General, F.W. Callaghan. Callaghan, obviously pressured by Jewish groups who wanted to silence one of their critics, John Ross Taylor, began lobbying the Federal Department of Justice demanding the inclusion of speech-restricting legislation that removed the need for “willfulness” or fair comment based on public interest. ( See the following site for the full history of Section 13: http://www.stopsection13.com/history_of_sec13.html )

According to Marc Lemire’s history of Section 13, “In 1976, the Federal Government was looking at a larger Act for employment issues and the provision of federally regulated services.” This Act eventually would end up with the innocuous sounding name: the Canadian Human Rights Act. Although no other section of the Human Rights Act covered speech, it was not a problem for the Federal government to capitulate [to the Jewish lobby. Ed.] and slip in an extra section to satisfy Ontario’s Attorney General’s lust to silence John Ross Taylor and his home-based answering machine.”

In 1977 Bill C-25 or the “Canadian Human Rights Act” was passed by the House of Commons on July 14th. Contained within it under the sub-title of “Hate messages” was Section 13 which read:

13. (1) It is a discriminatory practice for a person or a group of persons acting in concert to communicate telephonically or to cause to be so communicated, repeatedly, in whole or in part by means of the facilities of a telecommunication undertaking within the legislative authority of Parliament, any matter that is likely to expose a person or persons to hatred or contempt by reason of the fact that that person or those persons are identifiable on the basis of a prohibited ground of discrimination.

As Lemire goes on to state:

“Only a few years after the law was enacted, Mr. Callaghan finally got his wish and John Ross Taylor became its first victim, with the Canadian Human Rights Commission itself and several professional Jewish groups [Canadian Holocaust Remembrance Association and the Toronto Zionist Council. Ed.] as the complainants.

Since the law was first enacted, two major changes were made to Section 13. These changes fundamentally shifted the original intent of the legislation, and turned Section 13 into an instrument to financially and morally punish those with politically incorrect views.

The first change to the legislation occurred on May 15, 1998, when Royal Accent was given to Bill S-5 (1998), which added a new penalty provision to the Canadian Human Rights Act. Bill S-5 added Section 54 to the Canadian Human Rights Act, and allows the Human Rights Tribunal to impose a financial penalty of up to $10,000. On top of the fines, Section 54 also gave the fanatical Tribunal the ability to impose penalties of up to $20,000 as so-called ‘special compensation.’

According to the background section of Bill S-5, these penalties were added “as a response to the rising incidence of hate crimes around the world. The government believes that stronger measures are needed to deter individuals and organizations from establishing hate lines. It hopes to accomplish this by allowing victims of such lines to apply for compensation and subjecting offenders to financial penalty.”

The second change occurred in the aftermath of the terrorist attacks of September 11th 2001. Sadly, this legislation equated non-violent politically incorrect words – which are covered by Section 13 – with terrorism and concerns of national security. Under the guise of Bill C-36 – Canada’s Anti-Terrorism Act, Section 13 was expanded to cover “a group of interconnected or related computers, including the Internet.” This change, gave the power to Canadian Human Rights Commission to censor the internet and harass Canadians with views that the Rights Fanatics disagree with. [Emphasis added. Ed.]

This change was made according to Preamble of Bill C-36 to allegedly ‘combat terrorism.’”

It is assumed that the reader will already be fully cognizant of the Zionist agenda for global governance that is a given in today’s political reality, especially within the alternative media and on the Internet where Zionist “hate” laws are still not fully in place to restrict the natural flow of ideas and opinions that proceed from historical research and experience.

In 1941 Kaufman’s book was a brilliant piece of Zionist Jew propaganda designed to stir up anti-German hatred in America. Some say that it formed the basis of the infamous “Morgenthau Plan” that was later signed in Quebec, Canada by President Roosevelt and Prime Minister Churchill; one designed to dismember Germany after its defeat and reduce it to the status of “a goat pasture.” It probably remains to this day the foremost example of hate literature ever to have been published and dispensed to the general public.

As the reader will surmise from viewing the image of the back page of Kaufman’s book (see above) some of America’s most prestigious newspapers and magazines were in full support of the objectives set down in this classic book of Jewish hate literature.

I firmly believe that all of what the Zionist Jews write about others is actually but a reflection of their own inner, perverse, dislocated self. By projecting outward on to others their innate paranoid and deep-seated hatred for the rest of the world they’re able to meet the requirements of the Israeli state’s motto which reads, “By Way of Deception Though Shalt Cause War” and feel a sense of superiority and self-righteousness in doing so.
—————-

Germany Must Perish! Please take the time to look at this book.

Filed Under: Adolf Hitler, B'nai Brith Canada, B'nai Brith International, Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Cst Normandie Levas BC HATE CRIME TEAM, Det-Cst Terry Wilson BC HATE CRIME TEAM, Douglas H. Christie Barrister & Solicitor, Free Speech on the Internet, Freedom of Expression, Freedom of Speech, Germany Must Perish!, Harry Abrams, Hate Crime laws, Hate Crimes Bills, Hate laws, HOLODOMOR, Israeli Terrorism, Israeli War Crimes, Jewish Hatred, Jewish Hatred toward Germany, Jewish Lobby, Jewish Media Monopoly, Jewish Racism, Jewish Terrorists, Political Zionism, RCMP Corruption, Richard Warman, Sec. 319(2) CC "Willful Promotion of Hatred", Sec. 319(2) Criminal Code of Canada

Exclusive Interview with Ayman Qwaider from Intifada/Voice of Palestine

May 8, 2013 by admin Leave a Comment

http://www.intifada-palestine.com/2011/02/exclusive-interview-with-ayman-qwaider/

Ayman Qwaider, is a 24 years old humanitarian activist who has a bachelor’s degree in the English language and General Education. He was born in Nuserate Refugee camp which is located in the middle of the Gaza strip . He has worked in different fields for 4 years prior and after terminating his university studies.

During his university studies, he has volunteered in different local humanitarian organizations, where he developed social activism skills. He organized a series of projects for refugee camp children who have endured devastating conditions due to the Israeli military activities and its Assault on Gaza , and the on-going blockade. Part of that work included active participating in practical community initiatives carried out by young people.

Two years prior to leaving Gaza to complete his master’s in Spain, he participated in the Palestinian International Campaign to End the Siege on Gaza. Throughout his time working for this campaign he took part in organizing many non-violent activities that enjoyed the support of many international civil societies, Israeli human rights organizations and other solidarity groups from across the world. The main objective of this campaign has been peaceful and non-violent struggle, coupled with international media campaigns to unmask the Israeli siege over the Gaza Strip.

___________________________

Exclusive Interview with Ayman Qwaider

Please describe what life is like for a Palestinian from Nuseirat, a refugee camp situated in the middle of the Gaza Strip?

Ayman Qwaider: The living conditions in a Palestinian refugee camp have been the same ugly picture since 1948, when the indigenous peoples of that area were forced out of their homes by well-armed and funded non-indigenous Jewish immigrants just arriving from Europe intending to create an exclusively-Jewish state known as Israel. It would be pretty hard to describe what life for such a refugee is like in only a few sentences, and even with that, it truly is something that unless you experience it you will more than likely not understand.

Part of the painful history endured by these refugees is that their situation is very harsh. Without assistance agencies such as UNRWA–the United Nations Relief and Work Agency–and other humanitarian agencies to keep their life sustainable they would simply cease to exist. The overall awareness amongst the 1.5 million people living in Gaza is the feeling of insecurity and uncertainty. It is difficult for a human being to live in an unstable and insecure environment such as the Gaza Strip where people are constantly exposed to all colors of human rights violations. Every day the mother sends her children to school to receive an education, but she is not assured of having lunch for them or not. The farmer takes care and cultivates his land, but he is not sure that he will eat what his hands have created. The Gazan fisherman goes every day to fish but is not certain he will make it back alive to feed his family. Students spend 12 years in their studies but are not sure they will be able to pursue higher education. In the rare case students are allowed to exit Gaza to study they are unable to visit their families on holidays. The only EU-funded Gaza international airport that is supposed to connect 1.5 million Gazans with the outside world has been totally destroyed by our Israeli occupiers. This a brief overview about the current unstable and insecure existence in the Gaza Strip due to the four-decade Zionist occupation of our lands.
What was your education in Gaza like?

Ayman Qwaider: I received my overall education in UNRWS School (United Nation Relief and Working Agency) in Nuserate Refugee Camp. Despite the unstable drastic conditions that dominate in the Gaza Strip, I had a regular education. I finished my degree at the Islamic University of Gaza in January 2008 where I studied English and Education. As “normal” as all this may sound, the truth is that the situation for students in Gaza is completely different from those studying outside of Palestine. Most students here never get the chance to prove their true potential. I am 100 percent certain that they have the desire and energy to do so, but they are simply not given the space to demonstrate their abilities. Of course, the students are seriously affected by the on-going siege of the Gaza Strip; we cannot get the materials we need, such as books, stationary and even paper. In the most recent one-sided war, several of my university buildings were partially (or in some cases COMPLETELY) destroyed. With the borders closed by Israel, no raw materials are being allowed into Gaza, so those buildings that were destroyed a year ago are still lying in piles of rubble.

I can still remember the time I was still in secondary school before the withdrawal of Israeli settlers from Gaza in 2005, when the Israeli army would block the road that ran from where I lived to where my school was. So, from an early age I learned the education of occupation.

You were 14 years old when the 2nd intifada started. Did you take part in it? What did you do at this time?

Ayman Qwaider: Great question. I was 14 years old when the second Intifada erupted in 2000. Needless to say that second Intifada was dominated by the sense of violence and destruction carried out by the Israeli aggressive occupation. It was pretty hard for me to get engaged in the Intifada in the sense of using violence as I do not believe in it. Therefore I (alongside my friends) helped in organizing regular demonstrations to challenge the occupation and raise up our voice to the entire world concerning the system of injustices Palestinian are forced to endure. Though the occupation has been brutal, I have built my capacity in learning how to challenge occupation with peaceful means. I joined a set of programs to educate people on how to endure life under occupation during the Intifada.

During the winter of 2008-2009 Operation Cast Lead was waged by Israel against the Palestinians of Gaza. What did you and your family experience during such hard times?

Ayman Qwaider: It would be hard to express our feelings during the time of this one-sided war. I do not prefer to refer to the war as a Cast lead, because it’s hard for a rational human being to give such name for a military operation that dehumanizes human beings the way it did. In short, it was 3 weeks of uninterrupted terror. 23 sleepless nights hearing the continuous noise of gunfire. All sectors of life had been paralyzed, from education to health care. Each and every minute during this brutal massacre you are sure you are the next victim. Part of ongoing occupation, Palestinians in Gaza felt totally insecure at that time. Many times my family thought of leaving our home to look for refuge where we might be safer. But glumly we found ourselves fleeing from death to death even at the UN office which is responsible for supplying Palestinian refugees with food and the other basic needs for survival. Even this, the UN compound was targeted, leaving the people in absolute insecurity. I still remember how my mother was afraid during the war due to the constant shootings and regular Israeli F16 fighter jets flying overhead. It was devastating to me to see how my mother was not able to even offer tranquility and security for my younger brothers and sisters because of the fact she herself was not safe. Each minute we heard tragic news of dozens of people being killed, others injured, of homes being destroyed and other public institutions. Directly when the war ended, all that was left was tragedy–not by an act of God, such as an earthquake or tsunami, but rather by the hands of evil men and through their war, violence, and ongoing siege.

Personally it has been hard for me to understand how human beings can do this to others, this systematic dehumanization. According to the mainstream media and Israeli and international human rights organizations, we lost 1450 people, most of them innocent men, women and children. More disappointing to me however was to see that the great part of victims were children under the age of 18. It has been so hard for me when I think about how those children were systematically targeted in this inhuman way. We often hear that man is a rational creature, but I have a very hard time understanding how such rational creatures could do something like this to their fellow human beings and especially innocent children.

When and why did you decided to come to Spain to study a Peace Master?

Ayman Qwaider: I was accepted to pursue my post-graduate studies on November 2009 as a scholarship granted student. I chose to study a masters of peace because I totally believe in peace. As a Palestinian living in an impoverished environment deprived of peace in all its aspects, I therefore value peace and believe in its significant role in transforming society. I believe in peace that is based on justice, equality and human respect. I chose this study so as to be able to offer alternatives in viewing the Palestinian conflict on one hand while on the other contributing to the restructuring of peace for those who have lost their sense of it. I am studying peace to transform people’s negative mind-set that for a long time has been associated with losing land and compromising with the opponent. My master program is actually examining three main fields of studies – Peace, Conflict and Development. It draws the great interlink between these three fields of studies, in terms that you do not initiate a healthy peace framework without deep understanding of the conflict and that there can be no progress or development without first accomplishing peace. I chose peace studies to widen my knowledge and to be prepared to address the issues of injustices and inequalities in proper ways. I chose peace because my people back home in Palestine have been deprived of that very thing for decades.

What happened when you wanted to come for the first time to Castellón? How did you manage to get out of Gaza?

Ayman Qwaider: It was almost impossible for any students to leave the Gaza Strip in February 2010, the time I left Gaza with little to no change up until today. In my own case, even though I had obtained the visa to Spain and all needed documents to leave the country, the greatest obstacle for me was something called the Rafah border with Egypt. Like some country behind the Iron Curtain where citizens were not allowed to leave under penalty of death, so too are we Palestinians prevented even from leaving.

After working tirelessly in contacting anyone who would listen to my story I launched a comprehensive media campaign in the local and Spanish press, including the Facebook group and an online petition. Without going into the painful details, I received my longed-for transit permit from Israel in order to exit the Gaza Strip to the University of Jaume in Spain to pursue a graduate degree in Peace, Conflict and Development Studies. My efforts ultimately bore fruit and ended happily but at that time there were about 600 young people waiting with permits to exit Gaza.

Did you receive international help and support at this time?

Ayman Qwaider: I would not have done it–meaning getting out from the Gaza Strip–without the international support which supported my right to education. When I was stuck in Gaza, within almost one month I was receiving supporting e-emails and international calls supporting me in my cause. I also admit that some Israeli human rights organization supported me very much when I was denied access to start my education.

What is your experience as a Peace Master Student here in Spain?

Ayman Qwaider: It has been a deeply-enriching experience doing my peace masters in Spain. Meeting students from different parts of the world and sharing experiences have been a wonderful opportunity for me personally. I learned that there is not only one way to understand peace but rather many ways, as there are different people, cultures and ideas. Throughout this masters program I have gained proper knowledge of issues of conflict transformation, human rights discourses, theories of humanitarian aid, action and other courses. Through my studies I have developed intimate relationships with many people from diverse backgrounds. More importantly, this program has assisted me in academically framing my experience that I acquired first hand living in a conflict zone like Gaza and it has given me the opportunity to share this experience with my peers. Given the chance to do this Masters program has actually given me the sense of strength and security to pursue my studies as the educational environment here is much better than in the Gaza Strip.

Do you have any grant from any international organization to help you pay for this master?

Ayman Qwaider: I am currently a scholarship student pursuing my Masters, depending mainly on my scholarship payment assistance.

Which kind of social and economic actions are being taken to help the Palestinian people?

Ayman Qwaider: As a Palestinian from the Gaza Strip, I have found alarming and disturbing the level of pessimism about the state of the economy and the future of the peace process. The mainstream of the Palestinians have been not satisfied with the peace process result carried out with Israel. The estimated number of Palestinians living in the Gaza Strip is 1.5 million inhabitants and of those, almost 1.2 million are totally dependent on humanitarian aid and assistance delivered from UNRWA and other international humanitarian organizations. In light of the ongoing Israeli blockade followed by the devastating war, the entire economic and social system has severely deteriorated, with the level of unemployment at 80% and over 90% of people living below the line of poverty.

The absolute control of Israel over the Gaza Strip and restrictions on movement have devastated the economic system in the Strip and in just letting the basic necessities enter the Strip. This has had profound negative consequences for Palestinian society in all sectors. My concern is that the rapid population growth will only add to these already-terrible problems and make finding a solution all the more difficult.

As a peace master student, do you hold out hope for a viable solution for the Israeli-Palestinian conflict?

Ayman Qwaider: Before being a peace student but rather as human, I do believe that there is still great opportunity for true peace. Peace is always possible but it absolutely requires strength and commitment, and particularly during difficult times. Peace must be based on justice and in cultivating understanding in the face of misconception and conflict. Indeed, it has been 63 years now since the eruption of conflict, and if we have learned anything, it is that recent history has proved that peace can never be accomplished through direct negotiations between Palestinian-Israeli leadership since Israel has always and will always put great obstacles in front of any peace process. This is the orchestrated scenario since the agreement of the Oslo Accords of 1993, as Israel never deals in good faith. Humanity has been dehumanized for so long in Palestine, with the ongoing system of injustices represented through an apartheid system, a blockade over the Gaza Strip, the killing of the innocent and the outright theft of land. The only solution to bring about peace and justice in the entire region and to create a fair solution for the conflict is the power of the people. By cultivating a civil, non violent society between Palestinians and Israelis is the only solution to break down the Israeli apartheid system that separates people from people.

We all know how the world would welcome such a development. The power of civil society that helped bring about the end of the apartheid system in South Africa in 1980s can perfectly work in the context of Palestine. South Africans would not have done it without the assistance of the international civil society.

Please sketch for me the future you are working to achieve.

Ayman Qwaider: Since my childhood, I have dedicated my life to assisting my fellow man through education and to help as much as my ability permits me. Life in Palestine always puts a person in daily resistance due to the hardships. Therefore I would like to contribute to the process of bringing about peace and justice, a human right for all people.

You fight every day for the rights of your people. For them, you could be described as a hero. What do you think about this?

Ayman Qwaider: What is a hero? From my perspective several thoughts emerge in my mind when I think of a hero, specifically in a very broad sense. The word hero applies dynamically to individuals in different contexts of culture, history, gender, etc. The term hero might generally be associated with that person who is brave, generous and courageous. Considering yourself a hero, you would intimately reflect your own identity, culture, conflict and history.

For me, it had been actually wonderful when I discovered that my personality is motivated toward many interests. I finished my studies from the Islamic University of Gaza and was well-prepared to be a teacher of English language. Through my early life, people around me never stopped telling me that I have a smiley face. I always enjoyed being close with children. There is one prime characteristic I really admire about the life of the refugee camp, in that its small roads are always crowded with young children where they have fun and enjoy their time, even in such a dire environment. Accordingly, my attitude has changed from being a teacher of the English language for children to being very close to them through another dimension of work, which is the humanitarian aid and relief work.

Personally, it would be simple to identify the concept of hero according to my perception and my experience in Palestine. For me, the hero is the Palestinian child who grows up and builds his life despite living in such terrible conflict. This perspective is due to the fact that I lived in this situation of conflict my entire life as well as being close to children though my previous work. In this regard, I shift my thoughts dramatically to recognize the smiling child as the truly heroic figure.
——–

Filed Under: Ayman Qwaider, Gaza Strip, Intifada/Voice of Palestine, Islamic University of Gaza, Nuserate Refugee camp, Oslo Accord of 1993, Rafah border, UNRWA–the United Nations Relief and Work Agency, UNRWS School (United Nation Relief and Working Agency)

World Jewish Congress approves resolution calling for criminalizing Holocaust denial

May 8, 2013 by admin Leave a Comment

http://theuglytruth.wordpress.com/2013/05/08/world-jewish-congress-approves-resolution-calling-for-criminalizing-holocaust-denial/

The resolution on anti-Semitism also calls countries where appropriate constitutional provisions exist to consider banning neo-Nazi parties.

[TUT Editor's Note: so, in other words, these same Jewish interests CONSTANTLY lecturing others on ‘free speech’ and CONSTANTLY warning of the dangers of ‘Islamic Shariah Law’ where people are punished for holding/voicing opinions contrary to the precepts of a certain religion are now calling for laws to be made criminalizing free speech/free thought as pertains the ‘holy of holies’–meaning the Holocaust.

As one famous philosopher stated over and over when warning of Jewish power, ‘beware the leaven of the pharisees, which is hypocrisy and lying’]

Haaretz

The World Jewish Congress approved on Tuesday a resolution that calls on countries around the world, “in particular those whose Jewish populations were decimated in the Shoah,” to outlaw the public denial of the Holocaust, and where appropriate constitutional provisions exist, to consider banning neo-Nazi parties.

The resolution also urges Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban and other national leaders and legislators in Europe to join the 125 legislators from more than 40 countries in signing the 2009 London Declaration on Combating Anti-Semitism.

The WJC decided to hold its Plenary Assembly in the Hungarian capital as an expression of solidarity with the local Jewish community in the city, who have been under threat of rising anti-Semitism ever since the extreme right-wing Jobbik Party won a relatively large share of the vote in the last election.

The WJC resolution, supported by hundreds of delegates from Jewish communities around the world, urges the Hungarian authorities “to take effective measures including by enacting and enforcing legislation, for the protection of all citizens and residents of this country, in particular vulnerable minorities such as the Roma and the Jews, against threats of violence, racist hate and insults and the denial of the Holocaust.”

On Sunday night, the Hungarian prime minister opened the Plenary Assembly promising to act more forcefully against anti-Semitism, although he did not specifically mention the Jobbik Party, which captured 17 percent of the vote in the 2010 election. WJC officials expressed disappointment with his speech, which to their minds lacked substance.

In the resolution, the WJC calls on Hungary “to recognize that the ideology and the actions of the Jobbik movement and its subsidiaries, including the New Hungarian Guard, pose a fundamental threat to Hungary’s democracy, and that decisive action by all democratic forces against these contemporary expressions of extremism must now be taken.”

The resolution also expresses concern about recent signs of rising anti-Semitism in Ukraine.

Earlier today, the Plenary Assembly heard about a new legislative initiative in Greece, which promises a radical crackdown on anti-Semitism and other forms of racism in the country. David Saltiel, the head of the country’s Jewish community, who reported on the development, said the legislation will be submitted to parliament in the coming days, following the Easter holiday break.

According to the legislation, any individual or group that incites against or acts violently toward other individuals or groups “because of their racial origin, the color of their skin, their religion and/or their sexual preferences” could be punished with three months to six years in jail and be fined up to 20,000 euros. The same punishments would apply to Holocaust denial and the National Socialist salute. The legislation also stipulates that if a parliamentary party chief is found to be in violation, public funding for his or her party would be suspended.

———

Filed Under: "Canadian Parliamentary Coalition to Combat Anti-Semiti, "hate speech", "Jewish" holocaust, 6 Million Myth, Aboriginal Issues Can/U.S., Abrams/BBC v. Arthur Topham & RadicalPress.com, Adolf Hitler, Editor's Zone, Haaretz, Holocaust denial, HOLODOMOR, Hungarian Jobbik Party, Jewish Censorship, Jewish Hatred, Jewish Holocaust Industry, Jewish Holocaust Lie, Jewish Lobby Groups, Jewish Media Monopoly, Jewish Racism, Jewish Supremacism, Jewish Terrorists, Jews, London Declaration on Combating Anti-Semitism., National Socialism, Nazis, Neo-Nazi parties, Occupy Movement, Palestine, Political Prisoners, Political Zionism, World Jewish Congress (WJC), World Zionist Organization

Why Justin Trudeau May Be More Dangerous than Harper by Damien Gillis

May 7, 2013 by admin Leave a Comment

http://thecanadian.org/item/2066-justin-trudeau-more-dangerous-stephen-harper-politics-keystone-xl-fipa-nexen-damien-gillis

Why Justin Trudeau May Be More Dangerous than Harper
Written by Damien Gillis
Monday, 06 May 2013

Adrian Wyld/CP

Justin Trudeau just may be Canada’s most dangerous man.

He of the throngs of adoring supporters, the pretty new face that promises to resurrect “Canada’s party”.

The key positions he’s taken thus far – supporting the sellout of our strategic energy resources to the Chinese Government, giving away our sovereignty through the Canada-China Trade deal, new pipelines to expand the Tar Sands – hardly vary from those of Prime Minister Stephen Harper. They just look and sound far more attractive coming from Canada’s prodigal son.

And that’s what scares me.

Trudeau’s latest decision to out-Harper Mr. Harper on boosting the proposed Keystone XL pipeline to Texas give us a sobering sense of where the young Liberal leader is headed. Perhaps more troubling is the question of what he actually believes – or whether these positions derive from polling data, focus groups, and a cynical drive to get elected at all costs (more on that in a moment).

In his first swing out west following a successful leadership bid, Trudeau took the time to praise Alberta Premier Alison Redford’s efforts to secure access for Keystone by talking up improved “environmental sustainability” in the Tar Sands (exactly how, we’re left to wonder, beyond a carbon tax proposed by Redford).

“I’m very hopeful despite the political games being played by the NDP…that we will see the Keystone pipeline approved soon,” Trudeau proclaimed.

If Bay Street and the energy sector see that Trudeau is prepared to fulfill the same key objectives as Harper, they will not think twice about swinging their support back to the Liberals. This latest statement on Keystone signals that Mr. Trudeau is truly open for business. For this reason, while backing Keystone may be unpopular with certain segments of the Canadian public, it could prove a shrewd political move in the long-run.

Harper is uncharacteristically weak at the moment. There is the infighting within his usually locked-down caucus, the cratering polling figures (a recent Nanos poll has the Liberals leading the Conservatives for the first time in years, at 34 to 31% support), and an authoritarian image that is becoming increasingly problematic. He and his embattled foot soldiers, the likes of Joe Oliver and Jason Kenney, have had a very bad month.

Oliver overplayed his hand a couple of weeks ago when he attacked the world’s most respected climate scientist, the recently retired James Hansen of NASA, while on a “diplomatic” mission to Washington to build support for Keystone.

The tone-deaf Oliver ranted that Hansen should be “ashamed” of “exaggerating” the effects of climate change and impacts of the Tar Sands, apparently missing the irony of attacking his hosts while trying win them over. The comments, which backfired severely, were picked up by everyone from the New York Times to the UK’s Guardian. Hansen shot back, aptly branding Oliver a “Neanderthal“.

On this score, Trudeau seems to understand something his Conservative opponents don’t – i.e. cultivating buy-in for Keystone requires more sophisticated framing and at least a modicum of tact with our southern neighbours.

Meanwhile, the most likeable and politically adept figure in the Harper Government, Immigration Minister Kenney, finds himself embroiled in the growing scandal over his government’s foreign temporary worker program. The seriousness of this political pitfall is evident in the unusual backtracking Harper is doing on the program.

He’s right to do so. The problem for Harper with issues like this one, the buyout of Canadian energy company Nexen by Chinese state-owned CNOOC, and the botched fighter jet program, is the way they rile his base. Unpopular with small “c” conservatives, they drive division within Harper’s tenuous right-wing alliance.

With these troubles brewing on the home front and attack ads aimed at Trudeau falling short of the effect they had on his predecessors – Michael Ignatieff and Sétphane Dion – things are shaping up nicely for Harper’s young challenger.

The question is, what does this mean for Canada?

If all Mr. Trudeau represents is a better-packaged version of Harper’s economic vision, then how will the Canadian public and environment – not to mention the planet – be any better off?

The thing that has always bothered me about Justin – ever since his entry onto the public scene at his famous father’s funeral – is that he’s never appeared to stand for anything real. Years later, even following a lengthy leadership race and literally thousands of media clips and public appearances, I still don’t know what core principles motivate his drive to lead the country. He speaks in platitudes, clever but meaningless tweets – which is partly what makes him so effective with social media and our soundbite-obsessed mainstream press.

He is our version of Robert Redford’s character in The Candidate.

Evidently, if Justin stands for anything, it’s selling out Canada’s strategic resources and exploiting the climate-destroying Tar Sands. Where his father tried and failed to build a made-in-Canada energy policy, the younger Trudeau is going in the opposite direction.

Even that, though, I suspect, is more a reflection of his willingness to shape-shift his policies into whatever form advisers tell him will track best politically.

With Harper, by contrast, we have a sense that his zeal for expanding Canada’s fossil fuel industries through foreign ownership is something in which he believes on a deep, ideological level. I’m not sure which is better – the guy who believes in something I and many other Canadians patently don’t, or the guy who probably doesn’t but is willing to say he does, just to get elected. If these are our two choices, then I’m ready for a third.

Real leadership means fighting for real principles, even when they’re unpopular. Great politicians find a way to sell good ideas to the public and media.

Justin Trudeau does none of these things. But, boy, does he look good not doing them.
—-

Filed Under: Alberta, Alberta oil & gas industry, Alberta Premier Alison Redford, Alberta Tar Sands, Canada-China Trade deal, China, Chinese Government, Chinese state-owned CNOOC, Common Sense Canadian, Damian Gillis, Editor's Zone, Environmental Issues, Immigration Minister Jason Kenney, Jason Kenney, Justin Trudeau, Keystone XL pipeline, Liberal Party of Canada, Nanos poll, NDP, New Democratic Party of Canada, Prime Minister Stephen Harper

Apologists for Israel take top posts at BBC by Amena Saleem

May 3, 2013 by admin Leave a Comment

http://www.gilad.co.uk/writings/apologists-for-israel-take-top-posts-at-bbc.html

Apologists for Israel take top posts at BBC

Wednesday, May 1, 2013
Gilad Atzmon

Introduction by Gilad Atzmon: The Zionification of Britain is completed. However, the piece below is also a tragic glimpse into UK PSC’s impotence.

It is far from being a secret that the PSC has been Zionised. However, Considering PSC colossal failure in representing Palestinian interests within British media, PSC unprecedented success in expelling Palestinians from its ranks is pretty remarkable indeed.

Apologists for Israel take top posts at BBC

by Amena Saleem / April 28th 2013

http://21stcenturysocialism.com/

The American poet T.S. Eliot wrote that ‘April is the cruelest month’. The phrase springs to mind in April 2013, the month that a new director-general took up his post at the BBC and, within two weeks, had installed a line-up of hardline Zionists at the top of the world’s largest publicly-funded news organization.

Tony Hall, whose role as director-general commenced on 2 April, is a former BBC director of news and can boast a total of nearly 30 years working at the corporation. As such, he is well-versed in the BBC’s values — he knows what the BBC wants.

Soon after his own appointment, Hall named James Harding as the BBC’s new director of news and current affairs. Until December, Harding was editor of The Times, an avowedly right-wing, pro-Israeli paper owned by Rupert Murdoch’s News International group.

In 2011, Harding spoke at a media event organized by The Jewish Chronicle, telling his audience: “I am pro-Israel. I believe in the State of Israel. I would have had a real problem if I had been coming to a paper [The Times] with a history of being anti-Israel. And, of course, Rupert Murdoch is pro-Israel.”

Glee

The strongly Zionist Jewish Chronicle reprinted those words with glee as news of Harding’s BBC appointment broke. And it also took the opportunity to remind its readers that, during the Israeli massacre in Gaza in late 2008 and early 2009, when more than 1,400 Palestinians were slaughtered, Harding wrote a Times editorial titled, ‘In defense of Israel’.

Now bringing his pro-Israel biases into the top ranks of the BBC, Harding will be in charge of its flagship news and current affairs programs including Today, Newsnight, Panorama and Question Time. He will also be responsible for daily news bulletins on the BBC’s main television channels and radio stations.

According to the Guardian, Harding now holds “arguably the most important editorial job in Britain”.

The news of his appointment to the £340,000 ($518,000) per year post comes just a fortnight after the former Labour Party minister James Purnell took up his new position at the BBC as director of strategy and digital.

Purnell, who was one of Hall’s first appointments, served for two years while in Parliament as chairman of the Westminster lobby group Labour Friends of Israel. Hugely influential, Labour Friends of Israel has drawn support from senior figures within the party, including the former prime ministers Tony Blair and Gordon Brown.

Unsurprisingly, Purnell subscribes to the Zionist view, often taken in BBC news reporting, that Israel can do no wrong. Rather than as an aggressive occupier, Purnell portrays Israel as a victim of hostile, terrorist Arab neighbors. In a letter to Prospect magazine in 2004, Purnell wrote of the comparison made by campaigners between Israel and apartheid-era South Africa, saying: “I find it hard to reconcile that image to the reality on the ground. Israel is a democracy, suffering terrorist attacks, surrounded by countries that don’t recognize its existence, the victim of well-funded terrorist organizations that preach anti-Semitic hate”.

Fact-free propaganda

Israel, with more than 60 laws discriminating against its Palestinian citizens in all areas of life, including political and civil rights, can hardly be called a democracy if a democracy is a state for all its people. And two of its closest geographical neighbors, Jordan and Egypt, have long-standing peace treaties with Israel, something which would scarcely be possible if they didn’t recognize its existence.

However, Purnell’s fact-free, propagandized view of Israel will not be out of place at the BBC. The irony of course is that, under the terms of its Royal Charter, the BBC is meant to be committed to impartiality in its broadcasting.

That it is not can be evidenced in Hall’s third appointment — the promotion of former Today editor Ceri Thomas to the post of BBC head of programming. In his last full year as editor of Today, Thomas presided over a program that interviewed a senior Israeli politician or ambassador on average once every two months. Interviewees included Danny Ayalon, then Israel’s deputy foreign minister, and Tzipi Livni, an architect of the 2008-‘09 Gaza massacre.

Airbrushed

During the same period, not a single Palestinian leader or spokesperson was accorded a similar honor. There was no serious recognition, under Thomas’ reign at Today, of the Palestinian viewpoint.

Thomas may well have felt that a Palestinian viewpoint was unnecessary on Today — widely seen in British media circles as the morning program which sets the news agenda for the rest of the day. After all, Palestine itself did not register in any of the aforementioned interviews, which were conducted by the BBC’s heavyweight journalists, including James Naughtie and John Humphrys.

Every single interview focused on a BBC obsession, embodied in Harding and Purnell, and practiced by Thomas at Today, of the ‘threat’ to Israel from its Arab neighbors and Iran. There was no grilling of any interviewee on Israel’s occupation of Palestinian land, its violence against Palestinian civilians, or its arsenal of nuclear weapons which threaten the whole of the Middle East.

After each interview, the UK-based Palestine Solidarity Campaign wrote to the Today program to ask why Israel’s ongoing occupation of the West Bank and Gaza, in the face of international condemnation, had been airbrushed from the conversation.

Each time, this reply was received: “It simply wouldn’t be possible to discuss the complexities of the Middle East conflict during such a brief interview.”

So, over the course of six interviews in 12 months, each one about five or six minutes long, the Today program under Thomas couldn’t find a moment to bring up the Israeli occupation with the Israeli top brass it was interviewing. All of that airtime was needed to discuss not Israel’s aggression, but its own perceived victimhood.

One other moment from that year, 2011, stands out. On 23 March, Israel had carried out air and tank bombardments on Gaza, killing eight Palestinians, including two children and their grandfather. This was followed late at night by two rockets being fired from Gaza into Israel, which resulted in no injuries or deaths.

The next morning’s news bulletins on the Today program reported on the rockets which had hit Israel, but there was absolutely no mention of the death and destruction wreaked on Gaza by Israeli forces.

As ‘journalism’, it was beyond disgraceful. However, the presentation of some facts and the complete omission of others which resulted in the portrayal of Israel as a country under attack, while trying to live peacefully, was entirely consistent with BBC news reporting.

The BBC’s response to the Palestine Solidarity Campaign when questioned on why it hadn’t felt the deaths of eight Palestinians — two of them children — newsworthy, while giving coverage to non-fatal rocket attacks which took place in the same time period, was this: “Choosing the stories to include in our bulletins; the order in which they appear and the length of time devoted to them is a subjective matter and one which we know not every viewer and listener will feel we get right every time.”

This, then, is the history that Thomas brings with him to his new role as head of programming. Harding and Purnell carry with them their dedicated commitment to the Zionist cause. What hope now for Palestine at the BBC? April is indeed a cruel month.
———

Filed Under: Amena Saleem, BBC, Ceri Thomas, Gilad Atzmon, Guardian, James Harding, James Purnell, Jewish Chronicle, Palestine, Political Zionism, T.S. Eliot, The Times, Tony Hall

Smearing Kennedy by S.H. Pearson

May 3, 2013 by admin Leave a Comment

http://pearsonpayload.blogspot.ca/2013/04/smearing-kennedy.html
Tuesday, April 30, 2013
Smearing Kennedy

by S. H. Pearson

Listen bitches. Why would a man go out for hotdogs when he’s got this at home.

In this fast-reading autobiography, George Lincoln Rockwell educates, awakens and entertains. You will be brought to laughter and tears by his eloquent pendulum. You can count on this book having been suppressed by his killers for decades. Rockwell exposes them by it.

He was a brilliant, albeit, secular man. A Navy Commander whose last fighter cockpit was in the F8F Bearcat. Oh hell yes. Top that all you ground-pounding New York rats. I dare you.

He was tall, talented, well-turned, well-bred and had all the right stuff. The only thing he lacked was a God-fearing soul. He charged into the fray of life banking only on his human abilities. Sometimes a man needs more. But I read in his words a hard leaning toward Jesus Christ. Rockwell was devoid of hatred. He was right as rain and good as gold. He sang the praises of Christians from a secular mind — in that an honest man cannot deny the fruits of their tree. Rockwell was an honest man.

A virtuous man on his path to God with too many irons in the fire. Too many balls in the air. Too many wild dogs snapping at his heels when he wrote this book — to “be still and know that I am God” as the Word says.

This can be seen by the way life knocked him around. He leapt out there, taking on the punches without a prayer. Just his guts and wit. His first wife was an ice queen. His second finally collapsed under the pressure of his persecution. He was survived by seven children.

After a surprisingly good childhood despite the Great Depression and a broken home, Rockwell entered Brown University in the fall of 1938. A hurricane ravished the New England coast that year — tantamount to the covert, creeping communism. He fast learned that President Roosevelt was a traitor and a liar. And that Charlie Chaplin was a Marxist jew who changed his name from Israel Thonstein. Rockwell wrote that Chaplin “…is so red [that] even our pinko State Department has banned him from the U.S.A.”

However, even an intellectual like Rockwell swallowed the lies about Hitler. When Roosevelt’s jew-friendly war broke out, Rockwell rushed off to “come to the aid of his country.” To save them from the evil Nazi’s in a fratricidal war fanned up by the jews for the jews.

Headlong into the U.S. Navy. Back when “wooden ships and iron men” was still the motto. Rockwell got a kick out of military discipline. It was a good fit. He embraced the dangerous life of a Naval Aviator with zeal. Catapulted off USS OMAHA into blushing dawn. Dreams still in his head. Barely out of bed. Yonder lay blue Neptune kissing Aurora. Lip-lock to die for. Oh the sight of that. What a wake-up, aye, sailor-boy?

Five hours of wartime surveillance in an old prop-job with every drop of fuel measured to the mile. One mistake in his calculations and he goes the way of Amelia. Out here in the Fleet, it’s all pass/fail baby. Saying nothing of trying to set ‘er back down on a pitching, rolling deck, bleary-eyed, sapped and woozy. Can you find that little ship?

Rockwell sure as hell did. The John F. Kennedy Navy hardened him for what would come later. And like Kennedy in those days, boy was he good-lookin’. Had his pick of the fillies too. His accounts of women will make you tingle. Where are men like that today? Where are the gentleman in choker whites? He was eighteen before he got his first kiss. A Victorian to the bone.

All this in a man whose home life provided no church. I can only imagine the spiritual edge that a good Catholic or Muslim upbringing would have given him.

Beautiful writing about his Navy days will bring you to your knees even if you never wore the blue. He puts you there — flying stick in an old recon bird over El Caribe. The adventures of which he would later recount to the “less heroic deck-apes.” Lording it over the black-shoe Navy as they eagerly awaited reports from their pilots about what had been seen. “I ached for a carrier and a hotter plane with more combat…”

He longed for a brand new F4U Corsair, “at that time the hottest and deadliest thing in the air.” Make me break out in a cold sweat, fly-boy. Dang that gull-wing thing. With a monstrous cowling and a monstrous prop. Surly blue to disappear into the sea. I long for one too.

But next it was off to Pensacola and the P-38 Lightning. Life gallops along at top speed. A wife is taken. A family emerges. The war ends. Civilian life begins.

In 1950 the Korean War recalls Rockwell as a Navy pilot. This time as an instructor in the F8F Bearcat. “The F8 is the hot-rod of the sky and how I loved it.” He called it a bumble-bee. He called it a hornet. “It has so much power… It’s like riding a lightning bolt.”

About this time Rockwell learns about a Senator from Wisconsin named Joseph R. McCarthy. His awakening to the jewish problem thence began. It hit him like a tidal wave. As it does all of us. Just in time for Harry Truman to fire General Douglas McArthur, Rockwell’s beloved hero. The jews hated both McCarthy and McArthur, smearing them in their character assassination rags. Hissing venom and vitriol, they shouted about how McArthur threatened to become another Hitler.

Rockwell wrote, “I found that Communism was not only Jewish, but the Jews boasted about its Jewishness in their books and papers!” His new mission had begun. Smitten with the clarion call of duty to rid our society of this menace who was “forcing integration on us, degrading our culture with their filthy art of chaos and pornography and, worst of all, spreading the disease of Communism…” Once Rockwell heard the speeches of Senator McCarthy, his fire was ignited. He tore into text like he did everything in life — like a tiger.

He devoured all the commie rags and mags. The Daily Worker, New Masses, the Library of Congress yielded up its hidden treasures. He learned how Communist jews planted their seeds in China before the 1949 overthrow of its government. He read Henry Ford’s warnings from the 1920?s. He read the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion.

America was crawling with Communist spies in the 1950?s (all jews). Some of whom were caught and hanged. I bet you won’t read about them in the New York Times.

Rockwell writes that Jews were in charge of our atomic weapons and programs also. Leave it to Lyndon to undo what Kennedy did in forbidding the newly-formed jewish state a nuclear arsenal. Now look at the monster they have become.

All this Rockwell figured out before he got his hands on Mein Kampf. Like Henry Ford and DeWest Hooker, the blinders were off. He was wide awake, “I began to wonder why we had gone to war on the side of the Bolsheviks who had openly bragged for a hundred years of their plans to destroy us by force and violence, lies and subversion; while we completely wrecked Christian Germany, which never had a single highly-placed spy in our country…”

That was the pivot. That was the turning point. Then after he found a copy of Hitler’s magnum opus tucked away in the back of a bookshop, the big picture emerged. “I could not lay the book down without agonies of impatience to get back to it. I read it walking to the squadron, I took it into the air and read it, propped up on the chartboard… circling over the desert. I read it on the Coronado Ferry. I read it into the night and resumed the next morning. … I studied it, thought about it and wondered at the utter, indescribable genius of it.”

And thus began Commander Rockwell’s fever to fix what ails us. He tried doing this without a Nazi arm-band, but the news jews gave him no coverage. So he started the American Nazi Party knowing damn well that now they would.

He drew fire from the jews something fierce. They do the usual thing they always do. Smear you in their crooked press. Wreck your job. Go after your marriage and family. Yadda yadda. If all that does not deter you then they pay someone to kill you.

Rockwell was picked off like Kennedy in 1967. Oh well. Better than dying in adult diapers at 97. His book survived just fine. In full Nazi garb, he was invited to speak at universities all over the country. These speeches were filmed for posterity and can now be seen on YouTube. Rockwell is all over the Internet. You can download a free copy of this book here: http://jrbooksonline.com/PDF_Books/This_Time_the_World.pdf

—–

Filed Under: Adolf Hitler, American Nazi Party, Bolsheviks, Charlie Chaplin aka Israel Thonstein, DeWest Hooker, Editor's Zone, General Douglas McArthur, George Lincoln Rockwell, Germany, Germany Must Perish!, Harry Truman, Henry Ford, Sr., Joseph R. McCarthy, Mein Kampf, New Masses, New York Times, S.H. Pearson, The Daily Worker

Holocaust History Denial: A Clear and Present Danger by Kevin Barrett

May 1, 2013 by admin 1 Comment

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/04/22/holocaust-history-denial-a-clear-and-present-danger/

Monday, April 22nd, 2013
Holocaust History Denial: A Clear and Present Danger

by Kevin Barrett

I used to believe in “the Holocaust.”

Not as a religion – I’ve never been to any of the museum-temples or made a pilgrimage to Auschwitz or pored over the sacred texts. And I never was stupid or crazy enough to accept the Holocaust as a valid excuse for the Zionist theft of Palestine. (If the Holocaust had anything to do with Israel, then Israel would have been established in Germany – not Palestine.)

In short, I believed in “the Holocaust” as history, because I assumed that 99% of Western academic historians can’t be wrong.

I assumed that about six million Jews were exterminated by the Nazis in concentration camps, mostly in gas chambers, as part of a pre-planned effort to exterminate the Jews of Europe. As far as I knew, all of the reputable historians believed this. The handful of dissenters, I assumed, were cranks of one sort or another. And though I had met many Muslim academic colleagues who were Holocaust skeptics, I thought they were probably biased due to their anti-Zionism.

Then in 2006, out of the blue, for no apparent reason, I was attacked on Wikipedia as a “holocaust denier.” In fact, I was a well-known skeptic about 9/11 – not the Holocaust. I knew next to nothing about the controversies surrounding the alleged gas chambers. Wikipedia claimed I was a supporter of David Irving, Mark Green, and Ernst Zundel. In fact, I had never heard of Green, and barely even knew the names of Irving and Zundel. (I had spent most of the 1990s reading every French literary classic for my French Literature MA, then learning Arabic and studying Islam and Morocco for my Ph.D. while supporting my wife and two small children, so I wasn’t really paying attention to Holocaust-controversy news.)

I tried to correct the erroneous information – which came from some crank’s personal website, and had never been checked, much less corroborated – along with the dozens of other derogatory factual errors, on my Wikipedia page. The corrections would always be removed, and the lies, reinstated, by the next day. Sometimes it happened in a matter of hours.

This was enough to make me slightly paranoid.

But as the hippies used to say, just because you’re paranoid doesn’t mean they aren’t out to get you.

Somebody was trying to frame me as a “Holocaust denier” – presumably to damage my credibility on 9/11. Why would they do that?

By 2010 or so, I finally got around to reading a few books about the Holocaust controversies. The first book I read was Denying History by Michael Shermer and Alex Grobman. It had been recommended as the best introduction to why the Holocaust deniers are wrong.

Denying History blew my mind – but not in the way its authors presumably intended. It consists mostly of weak ad-hominem attacks against “Holocaust deniers.” Its arguments about the actual issues – the questions of pre-planned total extermination, cyanide gas chambers, and six million Jewish victims (or was that six million total victims?) – were not nearly as strong as I had expected. In fact, they were surprisingly flimsy.

Shermer and Grobman admit that the keepers of the Auschwitz memorial suddenly decided, one day in 1989, to reduce the number of victims of that notorious camp from 4 million to “about one and one half million.” That is a lot of victims to vanish so suddenly.

Shermer and Grobman claim that the suddenly-missing 2 1/2 million Auschwitz victims somehow magically re-appeared on the Eastern Front, where they turned out to have been shot down by German firing squads. This maneuver preserves the seemingly magical “six million” figure. But it raises some obvious questions about the reliability of the death counts. First, isn’t the mathematics of “subtract-two-and-one-half-million here, add two-and-one-half-million there” just a bit too convenient? Second, what about the forensic evidence? How can the remains of 2 1/2 million human cadavers have suddenly moved from Auschwitz to the Eastern Front? And third – if the orthodox Holocaust historians were that wrong about Auschwitz prior to 1989, what else might they be wrong about?

Shermer and Grobman downplay the issue of forensic evidence – because, it seems, there really isn’t a whole lot. Millions of people seem to have vanished without a trace. Instead, orthodox Holocaust historians rely on eyewitness accounts, not forensics, to establish the existence of mass-execution cyanide gas chambers and six million dead bodies. They say the bodies and skeletons were almost completely burned, so little or nothing remained. No point in looking for millions of bodies, you won’t find nearly enough.

On that point, the skeptics and the orthodox historians agree.

Denying History raised questions in my mind about the truth of what I had previously believed. It also, paradoxically, evoked my sympathy for the people the authors wanted me to despise. Just about all of them seemed like reasonably nice people. David Irving, Shermer and Grobman admitted, was a highly-qualified and accomplished historian who had suffered greatly, and even been imprisoned, for his sincerely-held scholarly opinions. David Cole, a young Jewish man led to “Holocaust denial” by his penchant for truth, had won a debate against the pro-Orthodoxy forces, including Shermer himself, on the Phil Donahue Show. The only way the forces of orthodoxy could win their debate with David Cole, it turned out, was by issuing death threats to terrify him into recanting.

Shermer and Grobham made me like David Cole, feel sorry for him, and despise the JDL terrorists who threatened to kill him if he didn’t pretend to agree with them.

Since Shermer and Grobman were such poor defenders of orthodoxy, I turned to Deborah Lipstadt, who had won a libel suit filed against her by David Irving. I assumed that anyone who could beat Irving in a history debate must have a rock-solid command of the facts. Her book Denying the Holocaust, I assumed, would put the deniers’ arguments to rest.

As I turned the pages of Denying the Holocaust, my astonishment gradually turned to fury. The book has nothing to do with history. It is one long hysterical polemic in favor of the author’s utterly unexamined a priori belief system. Lipstadt’s book consists of 100% emotion, zero percent rational-empirical argument about historical fact. It is basically an endless chain of mindless ad-hominem insults against the “holocaust deniers.”

If this was the best the defenders of Holocaust orthodoxy could do, maybe they didn’t have quite the airtight argument that I had assumed.

At this point, my faith in Holocaust orthodoxy was somewhat shaken.

Then one of my 9/11-skeptic acquaintances told me I should read Debating the Holocaust: A New Look at Both Sides by Thomas Dalton. I did – and found it was far better than the books by Shermer/Grobman and Lipstadt. Of course, it wasn’t really as neutral as the title sounded. Dalton obviously believed the holocaust skeptics had a better case than the keepers of orthodoxy. But at least he did try to elucidate the historical arguments, point by point. Though he did not convince me that the Holocaust skeptics were right, he successfully argued that the Holocaust controversy was a legitimate topic of historical debate.

I invited Dalton to join me on the radio to debate two defenders of orthodoxy, Roberto Muehlenkamp and Andrew Mathis, on my radio show. (Read about the show here, and listen at http://www.americanfreedomradio.com/archive/Truth-Jihad-32k-042410.mp3 ).

Then I met Nick Kollerstrom, author of the best book on 7/7, Terror on the Tube. Dr. Kollerstrom, a Ph.D. History of Science chemistry specialist, was expelled from his teaching post at University College of London simply for publishing a scholarly article evaluating the chemical evidence for the existence of homicidal gas chambers during World War II. Those who expelled him threw in gratuitous insults, but refused to make any effort to dispute the facts as laid out in the offending article.

I got to know Nick, rambled all over London with him, and found I liked him and respected his intellect. His views were legitimate scholarly interpretations, not bigotry.

These experiences have led me to conclude that the problem isn’t Holocaust denial – it’s Holocaust history denial (HHD). People like Deborah Lipstadt, and the other keepers of Holocaust orthodoxy, irrationally deny that the Holocaust is history, and therefore open to free and fearless rational-empirical debate. For them, the Holocaust is emotion-saturated sacred myth, not history.

Western culture – not just a few keepers of orthodoxy – is suffering from HHD. Everywhere you go, it is denied that the Holocaust is just one unfortunate historical episode among others, and that the data can be interpreted and reinterpreted in a wide variety of ways. The sacred shibboleths – six million dead, cyanide gas chambers, and a pre-planned total extermination – are the new holy trinity. Anybody who doubts them isn’t just another revisionist historian, but a heretic.

And the heretics are sent to prison, or have their careers destroyed, simply for writing or speaking about their interpretations of historical data.

Nick Kollerstrom tells me that many thousands of people have been prosecuted, in Germany alone, under the “political correctness” laws. How can anyone possibly be a historian in a society that imprisons people for expressing their interpretations of history?

Holocaust history denial is a clear and present danger. The Western tradition of freedom of inquiry is under threat. Ever since Socrates founded philosophy, acerbic skepticism about “public myths” has been central to Western thought. Today, it can get you thrown in prison or ejected from your job.

It’s time to meet the threat of Holocaust history denial head-on. Let’s re-historicize the Holocaust, and put an end to the Holocaust Religion!

I propose that America’s top fraud investigators should be immediately assigned to the Holocaust survivors’ fraud beat. The recent discover of $42 million in phony “survivor” claims is undoubtedly only the tip of the iceberg; billions more are there for the taking. The money recovered from the “no business like Shoah business” shysters should be applied to the endowment of Holocaust Revisionism chairs in a dozen or so of our leading universities. There, the world’s top Holocaust revisionists should be turned loose to develop their very best historical arguments. A lively scholarly historical debate between the revisionists and the defenders of orthodoxy would ensue.

Who would win the debate? I have no idea. Maybe, with the debate reinvigorated, the orthodox camp would find the motivation to go out and look for the long-lost forensic evidence, including the ruins of actual mass-human-extermination gas chambers and the remains of millions of victims’ bodies. Or maybe the revisionists, given a modicum of legitimacy and funding, would definitively prove their case.

Either way, history – and the Western tradition of freedom of inquiry – would be the real winners.
—

Filed Under: Auschwitz, Bishop Richard Williamson, David Cole, David Irving, Deborah Lipstadt, Editor's Zone, Ernst Zundel, Holocaust denial, Jewish Defense League (JDL), Kevin Barrett, Mark Green, Nick Kollerstrom, Thomas Dalton

How Many Jews? by Douglas Reed

April 30, 2013 by admin 1 Comment

How Many Jews?

Douglas Reed

[Editor's Note: The issue involving the "6 Million Jews" purported to have been gassed and roasted (holocausted) in German concentration camps during WWII continues to be hotly debated within the alternative media sixty-eight years after the war's end. In the case of the Jewish media aka the msm, their ongoing insistence on repeatedly reinforcing their own self-chosen figure of 6 million well after being proven to be historically inaccurate has created greater and greater skepticism on the part of truth-seekers everywhere who, now thanks to the Internet and the freeing up of the facts and the hidden information surrounding this controversy, are realizing that the 6 million lies of the Jews is nothing but Zionist Jew propaganda designed to buttress their failed attempt at mesmerizing and brainwashing the world into believing the greatest lie ever told throughout recorded history.

One of the earliest debunkers of the 6 million myth was British war correspondent and author Douglas Reed. Having lived through WWI and covered WWII in depth Reed was well aware of the historic context in which he lived and wrote. His comments below on the impossibility of ascertaining with any accuracy the actual number of Jews supposedly living in Europe from 1939 until 1945 are taken from Chapter 42 of his 1956 classic, The Controversy of Zion and give the reader a much needed reference point from which to judge just who is more correct when it comes to this ongoing clash over how many Jews died during WWII.]

from
Chapter 42
The Talmudic Vengeance

The trials of “war criminals” formed the peaks of the vengeance and the Everest of them all was reached in the Nuremberg trial of the chief Nazi leaders….

By the choice of the Jewish Day of Judgment for the hanging of the Nazi leaders and German commanders the Western leaders gave the conclusion of the Second War this aspect of a vengeance exacted specifically in the name of “the Jews.” The shape which the trial took showed the purpose of the immense propaganda of falsification conducted during the war, which I have earlier described. “Crimes against Jews” were singled out as a separate count, as if Jews were different from other human beings (and when the judgment was delivered a hundred million human beings in Eastern Europe had been handed over to the general persecution of all men, from which Jews in their proportion suffered in Germany). This particular indictment was made “the crux of the case” against the defendants (Captain Liddell Hart’s words) and was based on the assertion that “six million Jews” had been killed (as time went by the word “perished” was substituted for “killed”). An impartial court would at the outset have thrown out any suit based on this completely unverifiable assertion: At Nuremberg lawyers, who in a private case would have demanded acquittal on the strength of an unproven statement in respect of a decimal point or digit, used this fantastic figure as the basis of their demand for conviction.

I earlier described, with illustrations from Jewish sources, the process by means of which, over the years, the Jews were “singled out” from the mass of Hitler’s victims and their number inflated at will from day to day (Hitler’s book-bonfire became “the burning of Jewish books”; his concentration camps where ninety percent of the inmates were Germans became concentration camps for Jews; a wartime report about the killing of” 150,000 White Russians, Ukrainians and Jews at Kieff” was changed to “150,000 Jews”; and so on interminably).

The statement about the “six million Jews,” allowed to pass without question by the men on the bench, was the end-product of this process. In six years of war the Germans, Japanese and Italians, using every lethal means, killed 824,928 British, British Commonwealth and American fighting-men, merchant sailors and civilians. Assuming that the Germans killed, say, half of these in Europe, they killed (according to this assertion) fifteen times as many Jews there. To do that, they would have needed such quantities of men, weapons, transports, guards and materials as would have enabled them to win the war many times over.

The figure would not even deserve scrutiny if it had not been used to give the Second War the brand of “a Jewish war” and if that, again, did not foreshadow the shape of any third war. Because of that, it may be examined here.

At no time in history, from antiquity to this day, can the number of Judahites, Judeans or Jews, living at any given time, be determined; for that reason the number afflicted in any calamity also cannot be determined, and there are many more reasons why the number of Jewish victims in the Second World War cannot be fixed. The process of mystification begins in Genesis and continues through the Torah (the seventy people taken by Jacob to Egypt, for instance, apparently increased to two or three million within 150 years). At all periods large, and sometimes huge variations occur in the “estimates,” and only estimates are possible, as the present term, “Jew,” is legally indefinable and statistically elusive.

An eminent Jewish authority, Dr. Hans Kohn, in his article on “the distribution of Jews” in the Encyclopaedia Britannica Book of the Year for 1942, writes:

“In view of the fact that in several of the countries where the largest number of Jews were living in 1941 the census did not contain any questions regarding religion … the exact number of Jews in the world in 1941 could not be ascertained. The definition of persons falling under the classification of ‘Jewish race’ is in no way agreed upon … In countries where the census included questions of religious origins, even this religious criterion of Jewish faith is difficult to define exactly. Thus the assumption which generally varied around the figure of 16 million” (for the entire world) “cannot claim any foundation on exact ‘figures. To this uncertainty about the number of Jews in the world was added in recent years a growing uncertainty about their numerical distribution in the different countries and continents. Probably more than 6,000,000 Jews lived in Poland and the U.S.S.R.”

A weaker basis than that even for “estimates” (not to speak of “statistics”) can hardly be imagined, yet in the ensuing period, when all the additional confusions of war and occupation were piled on this infirm foundation, precise numbers of Jewish casualties were produced day by day, circulated by thousands of assiduous propagandists, and at the end declared to amount to six millions!

Dr. Kohn says that “probably” more than 6,000,000 Jews lived in Poland and U.S.S.R. in 1941. In respect of the U.S.S.R. this might corroborate another Jewish authority (Prof. H.M.T. Loewe), who said in the Encyclopaedia Britannica of 1937 that 2,700,000 Jews then lived there. Similarly, four years earlier (1933) the Jewish journal Opinion had stated that the Jewish population of the U.S.S.R. was under 3,000,000; and the Soviet official Encyclopaedia in 1953 stated that “the Jewish population of the Soviet Union in 1939 was 3,020,000.”

This near agreement among four authorities in respect of the period 1933-1941 might lead the reader to think that the number of Jews in one country at least (the U.S.S.R.) was established with reasonable accuracy at a given time. On the contrary, this is a statistical jungle where nothing is ever established. In 1943 the Jewish Commissar Mikhoels said in London (according to the Johannesburg Jewish Times of 1952), “Today we have in the Soviet Union 5,000,000 Jews.” That is two million more than two years before, and if it was true presumably meant that most of the Jews in Poland, after Hitler and Stalin fell out, moved into Soviet territory. However, in the same issue of the Jewish Times a leading Jewish writer, Mr. Joseph Leftwich, stated that the Jewish population of the U.S.S.R. in 1952 was 2,500,000, “a loss since 1943 of 2,500,000.” He asked, “where and how did they disappear?”; the answer, in my judgment, is that most of them disappeared into the statistics.

That is not the end of the confusion in this one section of the question. The Encyclopaedia Britannica of 1937 (in giving the above-cited figure of 2,700,000 Jews in Russia on Jewish authority) said they formed about six percent of the total population. The total population was elsewhere given in the same encyclopaedia as 145,000,000 and six percent of that would be 8,700,000!

The encyclopaedias, statistical yearbooks and almanacs are in this one question all at odds with each other and untrustworthy. I could multiply examples (for instance, the Jewish World Congress in 1953 announced that the Jewish population of the U.S.S.R. was 1,500,000) but wandering in a maze without an outlet is profitless. All published figures are “estimates” made at the estimators’ pleasure, and are without value. A professional accountant might write a book on the efforts of the encyclopaedists to make the post-war figure of Jewish population in the world conform with the pre-war “estimates,” minus six million. Figures are tricky things: a few examples:

The leading American reference yearbook, the World Almanac, in 1947 gave the 1939 Jewish world-population as 15,688,259. In later editions up to 1952 it increased this prewar estimate (without explanation) by a million, to 16,643,120. It gave the 1950 population as 11,940,000, which, if subtracted from the first figure given for 1939, gives a reduction of nearly four millions (though not of six). However, it based even this “estimate” on another estimate, namely, that in 1950 the Jewish population of the U.S.S.R. was 2,000,000. This still left unanswered Mr. Leftwich’s question in respect of Commissar Mikhoels’s statement, that in 1943 the Jewish population of the U.S.S.R. was 5,000,000.

In England Whitaker’s Almanac, of similar eminence, struggled with the same problem. In its 1949 and 1950 issues it gave the 1939 “estimated” Jewish world population as 16,838,000 and that of 1949 as 11,385,200, a reduction of nearly 5,500,000. However, the figures given for Jewish population in separate countries added up to 13,120,000 (not 11,385,200). Incidentally, Whitaker’s in 1950 gave the Jewish population of the U.S.S.R. as 5,300,000, against the World Almanac’s figure for the same year, of 2,000,000.

Both these publications are of the highest repute for painstaking accuracy and the fault is not theirs; in this one matter alone only Jewish “estimates” are available, and for obvious reasons no dependence can be placed on these. I pointed out the discrepancies in a book of 1951 and observed that Whitaker’s in 1952 no longer contained these “estimates of Jewish populations”; apparently it had abandoned the statistical quest as hopeless, and was right to do so. Another encyclopaedia in its 1950 edition also dropped the subject.

Finally, the New York Times, which may be described as the world’s leading Jewish newspaper (it is Jewish-owned and New York is today primarily a Jewish city) in 1948 published what claimed to be an authoritative statistical article, computing the Jewish population of the world (three years after the war’s end) between 15,700,000 and 18,600,000. If either figure was near truth this meant that the Jewish world-population had remained stationary or increased during the war years.

Newspaper articles are soon forgotten (unless some diligent student preserves them) but the great propagandist fabrications are handed on. Thus the historians, those men of precision in other questions, passed on the legend of “mass-extermination” to posterity. At the war’s end Professor Arnold J. Toynbee was producing his monumental Study of History and in its eighth volume (1954) said that “the Nazis … reduced the Jewish population of Continental Europe, west of the Soviet Union, from about 6,5 million to about l,5 million by a process of mass-extermination.” He called this “a bare statistical statement” and then added a footnote showing that it was not a statistical statement: “it is not possible to give exact figures based on accurate statistics and it seemed improbable in 1952 that the necessary information would ever be obtainable.” Professor Toynbee explains that his figure was based on Jewish “calculations, in which there were several possible sources of error.” He concludes that “it might be estimated” that five million Continental Jews had been done to death by the Nazis.

The estimate is historically valueless. The starting-point for consideration of this question is the fact that six million Jews, or anything approaching that number, cannot possibly have been “done to death” or caused to “perish,” for the reasons given at the start of this discussion; the very assertion, made before the Nuremberg court, was an affront to their 825,000 fighting-men, sailors and civilians, killed in all theatres of war, of which only the Western politicians of this century would have been capable.

The number of Jews who were killed or perished will never be known, for the reasons already stated and partly discovered by Professor Toynbee in his footnote to history. The very term “Jew” is indefinable; Jews are often not isolated in statistics; and at no time can the number of living Jews in the world be ascertained with any approach to accuracy. Indeed, any attempt to reach statistical clarity through census or immigration data is attacked as “discrimination” and “anti-semitism.” For instance:

“Immigrants seeking to settle in Australia will from now on not be asked on application forms if they are Jewish, it was made known in Sydney by the executive committee of Australian Jewry, which protested against this practice to the immigration authorities” (the Jewish Times, Johannesburg). In England, “it is impossible, in the absence of official statistics, to do more than make an intelligent guess … the exact number of Jews in Britain remains a mystery” (the Zionist Record, Johannesburg). In America, President Roosevelt was brought under unremitting pressure to abolish the requirement to state “Jewish” on immigration forms, and in 1952 a major campaign was waged by the Anti-Defamation League and the American Jewish Committee against the McCarran-Walter Act because it sought to restore this requirement. This act was in the event passed over President Truman’s veto, but even a rigorous application of the reinstated requirement would not lead to clarification, as applicants, if they wish, may insert “British” or any similar description, instead of “Jewish.”

This state of statistical affairs is now well-nigh universal, so that the whole question is a mystery and has deliberately been made one. None can even guess the number of Jews whose deaths, during the war, were not natural or the result of bombing and the like, but who were done to death by the Nazis. My opinion is that, whatever was the number of Jews in the countries overrun by Hitler, the number of their victims was in roughly that proportion to the total population stricken, Polish, Czech and other. I have found this to be the opinion of all persons known to me who survived the concentration camps and occupations. Having suffered themselves, their feeling for Jewish victims was as strong as for all others, but they could not understand why the one case of the Jews was singled out and the number of Jewish victims monstrously exaggerated.
——-

Filed Under: "Jewish" holocaust, 6 Million Myth, Douglas Reed, Editor's Zone, HOLODOMOR, Jewish Holocaust Industry, Jewish Holocaust Lie, Jewish Media Monopoly, Jews, Jews Behind Bolshevik Revolution, National Socialism, Nazis, Nuremberg Trial, Political Zionism, The Controversy of Zion, The Gulag Archipelago, The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion

Smart Move! Class Action Suit Against BC HYDRO

April 29, 2013 by admin Leave a Comment

BC Hydro has taken the draconian step of cutting off power to a customer who refused to accept a wireless smart meter.

Last May, a Hydro customer had a wireless smart meter installed on her home despite her refusal. This person suffers from electro-sensitivity and, as a consequence of the radio frequency radiation emitted by the wireless smart meter, her health began to deteriorate.

Despite pleading for months with Hydro to remove the wireless meter and to re-install the analog meter; they refused. Finally, with her health in jeopardy, she ordered a non-radiating analog meter from a company in the US that provides calibrated, tested meters to utility companies. With the supervision of a certified electrician the analog was installed, and the wireless smart meter was returned to Hydro.

When Hydro advised that the analog was not approved by Canadian agencies, the customer located a Canadian analog meter that met all the requirements and then asked Hydro to install it. Hydro refused, ignored her health condition and insisted that she must accept a wireless smart meter or they would cut her power.

On April 17, 2013, Hydro followed through with its threats and cut off its supply of power to her home.

Hydro’s conduct constitutes a violation of our autonomy and our right to determine what potentially harmful emissions do or do not occur from within our own domestic environment; our right to be free from physical intrusion by the state.

Due to Hydro’s actions over the last 2 years, culminating with its cessation of service to a customer for refusing to allow the installation of a wireless smart meter, the Citizens for Safe Technology Society and the Coalition to Stop Smart Meters are filing a class action lawsuit.

We invite participation in the action, subject to Court approval. Further information on the class action and criteria to join can be found at:

www.citizensforsafetechnology.org and www.stopsmartmetersbc.ca
__________________________

Citizens for Safe Technology Society & Coalition to Stop Smart Meters – April 29, 2013

Notice of Class Action Lawsuit against BC Hydro
Invitation for Participation

BC Hydro is a crown utility, an arm of the provincial government that is reaching into the private space of our domestic environment and imposing choices on us that raise serious health concerns.

The World Health Organization/IARC has classified wireless radio frequency radiation, such as that from BC Hydro’s Smart Meters, as a class 2B possible human carcinogen. Regardless, BC Hydro continues to impose, at our residences, the operation of these devices on a 24/7 basis.

BC Hydro’s conduct constitutes a violation of our autonomy and our right to determine what potentially harmful emissions do or do not occur from within our own domestic environment; our right to be free from physical intrusion by the state.

Active plans are in effect to advance this position before the Courts by way of a class action. We invite participation in the action, subject to Court approval, by individuals that meet all three of the following criteria:

You have indicated to BC Hydro in writing (by way of letter or signage) that you do not accept the installation / operation of a wireless smart meter at your home for reasons that include health concerns.

Either a, b, c or d has occurred:

Notwithstanding your written communication referred to above, BC Hydro proceeded to install and operate a wireless smart meter at your home.

Notwithstanding your written communication referred to above, you have received information from BC Hydro setting out its intention to install a wireless smart meter at your home.

BC Hydro has cut off its supply of power to your home as a consequence of your refusal to allow the installation of a wireless smart meter at your home.

BC Hydro has indicated its intention to cut off its supply of power to your home as a consequence of your refusal to allow the installation of a wireless smart meter at your home

At all times during the above-referenced occurrences, you have been a customer of BC Hydro at a residence which you ordinarily occupy.

HOW TO JOIN THE CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT AGAINST BC HYDRO

We need your correspondence with us to be in writing. Please complete the Class Action Registration Form which can be downloaded from citizensforsafetechnology.org and stopsmartmetersbc.ca.

Please send the Registration Form and donation for class action legal fees and administration by cheque payable to Coalition to Stop Smart Meters to the following address:

Coalition to Stop Smart Meters
PO Box 52061
Beacon Ave., RPO
Sidney, BC V8L 5V9

We are accepting donations to fund this civil lawsuit irrespective of participation.

If you have further questions, please contact:

Sharon Noble at director@stopsmartmetersbc.ca

Una St.Clair at una@citizensforsafetechnology.org

Filed Under: B.C. Hydro, Citizens for Safe Technology Society, Coalition to Stop Smart Meters, Sharon Noble, Smart Meters, Una St.Clair

Speak your mind! Gandhi

April 29, 2013 by admin Leave a Comment

Filed Under: Free Speech, Free Speech on the Internet, FREEDOM, Freedom of Expression, Freedom of Speech, Freedom of Thought, Freedom to Protest, Gandhi

The People’s Voice Campaign by David Icke

The Israeli Criminals Behind the NSA Spy Scandal By Christopher Bollyn

InYourFaceBook – Cyberspace Thugs Expelling Thought Criminals from Social Media by Justice4Germans

Facebook’s blind spot to Antisemitism

Internet Engagement

Revolt of the Plebs Broadcast June 6, 2013