Month: May 2020

Horst Mahler Closing Statement

MahlerHorst2

HORST MAHLER VICTIM OF ZIONIST LIES
______________________________________
‘Words fall into the flames of injustice like raindrops into Hell’s inferno when I attempt to express my outrage at the scale and intent of this lie against humanity.’
Arthur Topham
_________________________
Thursday, February 26, 2009
From:
‘Vlkische Reichsbewegung’ info-hm@voelkische-reichsbewegung.org
Horst Mahler Closing Statement
Translated from the German by J M Damon
In My Show Trial Before Munich District Court II
Case No. 2 KLs 11 Js 42142/07
Closing Statement
The great mystery of human history has finally entered our consciousness as knowledge of Truth.
The passage of God through the world that He created is revealed to us as the eternal struggle within God Himself, as He participates in the struggle against evil on behalf of what we humans consider the Good. Through us, God thus becomes Absolute Spirit, which, transcending morality, is neither good nor bad.
Man cannot judge God. We can exist only as a Volk. Without a Volk, Man cannot exist as Man.
As Herder taught us, nations exist as thoughts of God. They have identity and significance only insofar as they can be distinguished from one another.
An orchestra consisting of nothing except violins would quickly bore the audience. Every Volk is a separate thought or concept of God and has the obligation to preserve itself as such, through all changes and vicissitudes.
It is the destiny of Judaism, the diffused nation within other nations, to exist as the spirit of negation. Without this spirit of negation God could not know what He is not as well as what He intends to be. Because it exists as the spirit of negation, Zion is and ever has been hated and shunned by all nations. (Book of Isaiah, Chap. 60, Verses 14 and 15).
In our (Christian) age, however, Zion has been redeemed by the nations through their acknowledgment of Judaism as ‘the negation of the lives of nations(Martin Buber.)
Zion redemption began with Jesus words:
‘You (the leaders of Zion) belong to your father, the devil, and you want to carry out your father desire.
He was a murderer from the beginning, not holding to the truth, for there is no truth in him.
When he lies, he speaks his native language, for he is a liar and the father of lies.
Because I tell the truth, you do not believe me!
(John 8, 44-45)
As servants of God the Trinity, the Jews established the Empire of Mammon as a challenge and admonition for the nations of the Earth. The Empire of Mammon is now reaching its end, however. It has the lie of Jewish ‘gas chamber genocideto thank for its culmination as well as its fall. The gas chamber or ‘Auschwitz Liewas indeed the greatest lie in the history of mankind.
Now that the world monetary swindle has culminated and been exposed, the world is asking itself: ‘How could such a swindle have occurred?It came about through international illusions about the role and the true nature of Judaism, in particular illusions about Jewish plutocrats. These illusions have now vanished, along with the make-believe homicidal gas chambers utilizing Cyclon B Insecticide at Auschwitz Concentration Camp. The Auschwitz Lie has finally run its course and the truth has triumphed.
The mighty protector of Israel, the United States of America, is disintegrating before our eyes, while the ‘HolocaustCult is devouring itself in ratlike fury by persecuting those who dare to expose it. If there were real empirical, forensic or documentary evidence for the unique crime that the Jewish-owned media call ‘Holocaust,they would certainly have presented it long ago, and this would have enabled them to neutralize their skeptics with ridicule. But there is no such evidence, since no gas chamber genocide occurred.
It is incumbent upon companions of our Volk to deliver the death blow to the Judaic ‘HolocaustCult, and this can be accomplished only through self-sacrifice. Until now we have been duped by the Jewish Media into opposing the compulsory ‘Holocaustdogma under the banner of freedom of opinion. From now on, however, we are no longer restricted to struggling for human rights under this banner. Now there is more at stake than winning freedom to express opinions. The continuation of our existence as a German nation is at stake, the survival of our Volk.
Guilt kills the human spirit, as mankind has known since the pioneering discoveries by the Jewish scientist Sigmund Freud. Section 130 Paragraph 3 of the Criminal Code is more than a mere ‘muzzle‚ it is a weapon for the spiritual destruction of our Volk, used in relentless attacks on our existence as a nation. Section 130 is illegal under international law. We are compelled to defend ourselves against it — and not just for our own sake. The German Volk is the light of the nations. We have a God-given obligation to keep it alive and beaming.
Germans must comprehend that, in the ancient Talmudic spirit, world Jewry is now attacking our right to defend ourselves and preserve our Volk with life imprisonment! Such drastic punishment is a good measure of their desperation. It has become necessary because Germans of sound character can no longer desist from speaking the truth and calling the Auschwitz Lie by its name.
Everyone who acknowledges the right and the necessity of self-defense has a duty to oppose the Jewish genocide against the German spirit. The way to oppose this genocide is to speak the truth.
In our day, the German who does not kowtow to the Jews will be relentlessly brought before the courts and deprived of his freedom, so that he will spend his life behind bars. I stand convicted of exposing Talmudic perfidiousness by ceaselessly calling the Auschwitz Lie by its name and confronting it with the truth. I have been doing this for many years now, since I swore a sacred oath to my Volk never to relent in the struggle against the ‘HolocaustCult.
At the age of 73, I can expect to spend the rest of my days under the dictates of the foreign interests that dominate our Fatherland. 21 months of imprisonment have already been pronounced. In addition to this, the vassals of foreign domination in Potsdam District Court demand another 57 months while those in Munich demand 72 months. For a 73-year-old man, a sentence of twelve and a half years is life imprisonment.
Quod erat demonstrandum! [This is what had to be demonstrated.]
I ask my fellow Germans: do you want to languish forever?
Throw off the joke of Jacob!
We have the most powerful weapon of all, the Truth.
We must make use of it!
Munich, 25 February 2009
Treason doth never prosper, what’s the reason?
For if it prosper, none dare call it treason!
Sir John Harrington 1561-1612.
Here’s freedom to him who would speak,
Here’s freedom to him who would write;
For there’s none ever feared that the truth should be heard,
Save him whom the truth would indict!
Robert Burns (1759‚96)
****************
Horst Mahler Closing Statement

{ Add a Comment }

Tell the Truth and Shame the Devil The sensational book by Gerard Menuhin, son of the famous violinist Yehudi Menuhin.

Screen Shot 2016-04-14 at 6.50.15 AM

Gerard could no longer bear the lies being perpetrated against Germany and risked all to unmask what he called the ‘biggest lie in history’ and the mightiest fraudulent criminal enterprise in mankind’s history—the Holocaust industry.
In this, his first book in English, Gerard Menuhin breaks through every taboo barrier.
He writes: ‘The Holocaust is the biggest lie in history. Germany has no blame for the Second World War.’ He also makes a case for Adolf Hitler being the only statesman in the modern era who could have liberated the enslaved people of planet Earth from the clutches of organized world Zionism.
He writes:
‘I suppose it began with a sense, nothing more. Not even a vague sentiment, let alone the certitude that what the average child is taught about major historical events is a pack of lies. It was just a lurking mental itch. My father never spoke of the war, any more than he spoke of anything negative or disagreeable or, indeed, about the past at all, if he could help it.
I never gave the subject much thought, occupied as I was with my daily drudgery, until the Nineties, when, while I was ordering the contents of my deceased grandparents’ house, I chanced on a copy of the National Zeitung, the patriotic German newspaper to which my grandfather had contributed a column for several years during the Sixties.
Due to the exceptional nature of the twelve years of National Socialism, a large and growing body of lurid fiction and alleged fact has materialized, based on its dramatic superficialities rather than on any study or comprehension of its socialist policies, and inspired by a particular agenda.
Sobriety rejects sensationalism. A perusal of reputable historical sources, some of them quite hard to find, helped me to form my own opinion. The most powerful persuasion, however, did not come from the rather dry accounts in my reading, but from the perfectly straightforward deduction that a people with the traditions and culture of the Germans did not almost overnight become barbarians and commit mass murder.’
Gerard was punished for breaking ranks and declaring himself on the side of truth.
In 2005, he was fired from his position as chairman of the Yehudi Menuhin Foundation after giving an interview in the Deutsche Stimme newspaper in which he said:
‘An international lobby of influential people and organizations is trying to keep the Germans under pressure. Some nations — mainly America, but other Europeans, too — are profiting from an obedient Germany.’
He also called on Germans to stop paying taxes and thus protest at the outflow of German funds to the European Union. ‘People cannot be eternally exploited in this way,’ he said, ‘as long as there is a budget deficit, no German public money should flow abroad.’
In his regular column with the Nationale Zeitung newspaper, Gerard condemned Jewish ‘souvenir hunters’ who gather evidence in Germany to help them to lodge financial claims for wartime persecution.
TELL THE TRUTH AND SHAME THE DEVIL
Layout 1
By Gerard Menuhin.
Have you ever asked yourself why the world won’t come to rest? Why your parents, grandparents or great-grandparents had to die in wars that never should have occurred in the first place?
A book of monumental importance for the people of the world today. Many know that something is not right in the world. Nations engage in perpetual war while bankers and armaments makers line their pockets from the carnage. The average citizen of the world has been cut out of the decision-making process of government, whether he lives in a democracy, republic, theocracy or dictatorship.
All the while, the ruling elite grow stronger and richer as the real producers struggle to survive. Behind the scenes, events are controlled by a coterie of ethnic puppetmasters who work their marionettes in high places out of public view. How did this world get to the dark place it is today?? Who could have stopped it and what can we do today?
The book consists of three sections. The first section concerns Adolf Hitler, his character and intentions, and the real causes leading up to the outbreak of WWII, including the actions of the real culprits and the rejection of the great lie.
The second section enlarges on the activities of the real culprits, provides a historical overview of their progress, their nature, their power over finance and the media, and the methods by which they achieved it. It includes insights into Freemasonry, the European revolutions, the influence and control of education and foreign policy, the creation of the EU, the New World Order and the evolution of the plan through the same powers and their proxies, since the 17th century up to the present.
The third section concerns the First and Second World Wars (what the author refers to as ‘the Second Thirty Years War’), their conception, funding and inescapable continuity; current laws against freedom of expression, and the evolution of the Orwellian state; the importance of U.S. support for the Soviet Union throughout the Cold War, and Communism’s significance in the plan; the true origins of the enemy; Palestine’s occupation and its fate as an example of our common fate; plus much more.
The text is interspersed with ‘Memos from Today,’ that emphasize its relevance by citing current events. Hundreds of quotes are included from a wide range of authoritative sources, original and translated. The last pages of this manuscript comprise conclusions and predictions.
The narrative is dense and packed with facts, and backed by expert testimony. At times, the style is personal, even casual, and absolutely non-intellectual. It has been assumed that a personal touch makes the contents more accessible.
The author is the son of the great American-born violinist Yehudi Menuhin, who, though from a long line of rabbinical ancestors, fiercely criticized the foreign policy of the state of Israel and its repression of the Palestinians in the Holy Land.
Read it. Think about it. Distribute it to others. This is a book that can make a difference!
Source: http://www.philosophers-stone.co.uk/

{ Add a Comment }

The Rizoli rebellion by John Kaminski

RizoliRebellionHdr

I know a lot of keyboard warriors. Heck, I’m one myself, trying to convince people of the dangers we face without actually confronting them in the real world. Though my advice might be authentic, my actions are not, because I’m not out there in public battling the tyrants and swindlers who are busy ripping us off and killing those who oppose them.
Am I afraid of suffering the harsh penalties incurred by so many who have challenged the powers that be? You bet I am. Do I know the day will come when I will be forced into open warfare with the people who run our country and have turned it into a giant prison system? Absolutely I do. It could happen any day now. And each day this unpleasant but vital task inevitably draws closer.
Though I am definitely a member of an exclusive club that has tried for decades to alert my fellow citizens to the lethal danger we face living in a society governed by ruthless Jew bankers who have no real point to their lives other than stealing from others and murdering those who stand in their way, my admiration really goes out to my compatriots who step out from behind their keyboards and wade out into the public chaos to defend the courage of their convictions and expose the constant and profound crimes that are being perpetrated by our owners against ordinary people who don’t ever quite seem to grasp the danger of their own predicament and how near they are to losing everything, including their own lives.
I’ve observed Jim Rizoli stepping out into the public spotlight for ten years now, first as a courageous protester of this strange and mysterious epidemic of foreign born illegal aliens being inserted into towns all across America, seriously diminishing the lives of native-born Americans who have worked all their lives for their modest piece of the pie. They have been constantly betrayed by their own leaders.
Some might consider what Rizoli is doing as tilting at windmills, but others of a more intelligent nature realize he is a 21st century patriot running at top speed to try and prevent the descent of the United States into a thoughtless prison camp dominated by aliens from the Third World and the Warsaw ghetto.
This surreptitious sabotage of American culture has grown to epidemic proportions with a deliberate but secret program of importing Third World aliens into the U.S. that has wracked big cities and small towns with ungrateful non-English speaking migrants who overload social systems and steal jobs from unemployed locals who need them.
And more lately, Rizoli has become the chronicler of one of the great hoaxes of the 20th century, a lucrative scam that has persisted into the 21st century as disingenuous Jews continue to swindle governments around the world with their heinous heist known as Holocaust reparations.
He has done this by undertaking a series of YouTube videos aptly titled the League of Extraordinary Revisionists, introducing to the public those heroic truth tellers who have been savaged by the poisoned mainstream media yet have persevered to correct the damaging Jewish lies that not only caused the destruction of Germany back in World War II, but are now wrecking America and Europe with their Jewcentric political correctness that encourages perversion, anarchy and dependence on government to destroy a thousands of years old family structure that has been the bulwark of civilization and now teeters on the brink of ruin.
‘The Holocaust is like a wheel with spokes that extend out from the center and poison all areas of human activity,’ Rizoli likes to say.
He, like so many of us, has seen far too much of it. But he, like so few of us, has been slugging away at the corrupt basis of it for more than a decade, going nose to nose with the Jews who control the political cobwebs of every town in America.
Oddly, it was his resistance to the sudden appearance of hundreds of Brazilian immigrants in his hometown of Framingham, Mass. that eventually led him to correlate this social disease to Jewish power and more specifically to the lies that have been told about the Holocaust.
‘It all goes back to immigration,’ Jim says. ‘My brother Joe got into it first.’ Joe still writes commentaries and passes on links to his brother, but it is Jim, accompanied by his new sidekick Diane King, who are constantly updating a remarkably thorough website (ccfiile.com — note the extra ‘i’, standing for Concerned Citizens and Friends of Illegal Immigration Law Enforcement) that contains both the story of their immigration battles with the corrupt town fathers as well as a unique and thorough set of files about the Jewish manipulation of reality.
‘We held a meeting at the library, and right off the bat they jumped on us,’ Jim explained. ‘They pegged us as racists and wouldn’t let us even talk about it.
‘It made us more determined to go at it.’
It was the Rizolis’ stand against the barrage of immigrants overwhelming Framingham that initially got them in trouble with their community, repeatedly banned from their local cable TV channel, and on the Jewish Anti Defamation League’s target list as Holocaust denying anti-Semites. Its description of the Rizolis’ activities is absolutely heroic. http://archive.adl.org/nr/exeres/7f918ae0-1eeb-4037-b83a-46c92344a4a7,db7611a2-02cd-43af-8147-649e26813571,frameless.html
• During an October 2009 segment of his public access television show, which was aired during a primetime slot, Jim delivered a lengthy diatribe promoting Holocaust denial. He defended Holocaust denier and Iranian leader Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, instructed viewers to conduct their own research on the Holocaust to discover the ‘truth,’ and directed people to visit Web sites that advance Holocaust denial.
• Jim Rizoli has attempted to defend his statements about the Holocaust to the Boston Globe, which reported in November 2009 that he ‘believes…only around 300,000 people died, not six million, and that the majority were not killed but ‘died of sickness and disease.’’
• During the same segment of his public access television show, Jim Rizoli alleged the existence of a ‘Zionist controlled government,’ implying that Jews manipulate national and global institutions.
• Rizoli also claimed during the show that ‘a lot of the Jewish people are not going to be happy to hear this [referring to his recommendation to view videos that advance Holocaust denial] because this whole thing all stems upon Judaism [sic] and what happened with them.’ This is an anti-Semitic implication that Jews fabricate the Holocaust to advance their own agenda.
• Joe Rizoli has questioned the severity of the Holocaust on the Jews. During an interview with the MetroWest Daily News in February 2004, he argued, ‘What happened to the Jews was atrocious, but you know what? Nine million people in Germany died in Dresden and related incidents. They say 13 to 20 million people died in Russia.’ Rizoli went on to question, ‘Did the Holocaust happen? You define to me what the Holocaust is. I don’t know. There’s no letter or whatever that pinpoints Hitler saying it.’
• In 2004, Joe Rizoli signed an Internet petition supporting Ernst Zundel, who was fighting deportation to his home in Canada from the U.S., which he entered illegally. Reportedly, Rizoli became interested in Zundel after receiving a ‘ZGram,’ an E-mail that Zundel’s wife, also a Holocaust denier, sent to subscribers. Ironically for a xenophobe, Rizoli spoke out against Zundel’s deportation, which was the result of Zundel’s illegal entry into the U.S.
As they say, one man’s meat is another man’s poison. To those onto the Jewish scam of the Holocaust, these are all admirable achievements. But to Jews, ever the promoters of lies and false stories, Rizoli’s unflinching achievements are anathema.
‘We had a good following,’ Jim remembers. ‘We became like celebrities because we had the balls enough to talk about illegal immigrants. It opened up the door to talk about it in the whole state. Even the governor came and talked to us. And a Brazilian station put us on down there.’
‘Then I started getting into the Holocaust and even the immigration people were scared off,’ he remembers.
‘We took the most heat from then on. In 2010 we were banned by our cable station for a year for false allegations. We came back in 2011 with four shows. We were on 12 times a week.
‘We were pounding away at the Jews. It’s a wonder that they didn’t kill us.’
The cable company shut them down again in 2014.
‘Nobody would dare come on a show dealing with the Holocaust issue.’
Good fortune came Rizoli’s way about this time when he hooked up with Diane on Facebook and the pair have become teammates in a game most Americans are afraid to play — Holocaust revisionism.
What has gained Rizoli new found attention after years of battling the Jews in a beat up suburb of Boston now dominated by Brazilians is a series of YouTubes sketching the lives of famous historians who can tell the real story of World War II, which is not the one told in movies and on TV by paid shills who spout the bogus Jewish version of reality.
League of Extraordinary Revisionists
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCkhr7Ooo_lnt0NLW83Q2ovw
Be sure and check out the real heroes of the revisionist movement captured on film by JIm Rizoli.
These include, among many other luminaries, Fred Leuchter, author of the Leuchter Report that proved there were no gas chambers at Auschwitz; Robert Faurisson, the dean of Holocaust Revisionists who for more than a half century has been challenging the Jewish liars ‘to show me or draw me a picture of the gas chamber at Auschwitz’; Germar Rudolf, the German chemist jailed for his efforts at refining and reinforcing the evidence for the Holocaust hoax; and the late Bradley Smith, interviewed in the final months of his life after selfless decades of preaching historical sanity on college campuses with his Committee for Open Debate on the Holocaust.
In addition, there are many other controversial topics covered in ccfiile.com — Holocaust Liars and Holocaust Truthers, Auschwitz and Treblinka, AIPAC and the Slave Trade, witch trials and Rizoli Uncensored.
Among the many highlights are a riveting account of the fake Boston Marathon bombing and a Police file that explains how public officials are allowed to commit crimes and get away with them.
‘We’re not letting up,’ says Joe, then making this writer not mention an event they’re in the process of unleashing on the public.
‘It’s going to be a struggle forever,’ says JIm. ‘I don’t know how we’re going to do it (‘it’ being to get the public to accept the real story of what happened in World War II in Germany).
‘We just have to hang in there. We’re not looking to convert the world we’re just trying to get the word out.’
Rizoli is constantly emphasizing that ‘the Holocaust is the hub of what has gone wrong with the world.
‘But I love the fight. I’m not going down on my knees. If I go down I’m going to be standing up. You have to do what you know is right.’

Support JIm Rizoli’s important work by mail at
Jim Rizoli (LOER), 94 Pond St., Framingham MA 01702, 508-872-7292.
John Kaminski is a writer who lives on the Gulf Coast of Florida, constantly trying to figure out why we are destroying ourselves, and pinpointing a corrupt belief system as the engine of our demise. Solely dependent on contributions from readers, please support his work by mail: 6871 Willow Creek Circle #103, North Port FL 34287 USA.
http://therebel.is/kaminski
http://johnkaminski.info/
http://www.rudemacedon.ca/kaminski/kam-index.html
http://www.serendipity.li/john_kaminski_articles.htm
http://web.archive.org/web/20040323232319/http://johnkaminski.com/

{ Add a Comment }

Life’s a Gamble So is Donald Trump By Michael Collins Piper

TrumpGamble

The following detailed background on billionaire real estate developer, TV personality, author and GOP presidential candidate Donald J. Trump comes courtesy of an excerpt from Michael Collins Piper’s book, The New Jerusalem: Zionist Power in America, which was published in 2004 by AMERICAN FREE PRESS.
By Michael Collins Piper
An inquiry into the background of flamboyant American entrepreneur Donald J. Trump provides some surprising insights into Trump’s path to power and influence, for the fact is that Trump’s rise to stardom came as a direct consequence of his having functioned as hardly more than a colorful front man for some very wealthy behind-the-scenes sponsors.
Everyone knows, of course, about Trump’s gambling operations and of the wide-ranging links of the gambling industry to organized crime. But the story is much bigger than that. In his own memoir, The Art of the Deal, Trump proudly described how in 1987 he bought his first casino interests when he purchased 93% of the voting stock in the Resorts International gambling concern.
What Trump doesn’t tell his readers is what the late Andrew St. George reported in The Spotlight on October 30, 1978 (and in the previous September 25, 1978, issue): Resorts International was established and controlled by front men for the Rockefeller and Rothschild families and their ‘enforcers’ in the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and its allied intelligence agency, Israel’s Mossad.
TheNewJerusalemRS
What made the report so explosive was that this newspaper pointed out that the illegally rigged casinos were being operated with the collusion of ‘respectable’ politicians, law enforcement officials, Wall Street financiers who floated loans to finance the gambling resorts and the high-profile gambling resort operators themselves.
St. George pointed out that many of these casino resorts run by the mob through a variety of front men have actually been engaged in a de facto partnership with behind-the-scenes mobsters who have assisted the CIA and the Mossad in massive laundering of drug and gambling profits that have been channeled into covert operations of the two allied
intelligence agencies. In return, the CIA and the Mossad, using their own influence, have provided ‘protection’ for the illegally fixed gambling operations, preventing law enforcement authorities from cracking down on this corruption.
Where does would-be president Trump fit into the picture? To find the answer, one must turn to the murky origins of Resorts International.
Resorts evolved from a CIA front company set up in the early 1950s by then-CIA director Allen W. Dulles and his close associate, three-term New York Governor Thomas E. Dewey, political functionary in the so-called ‘Rockefeller Republican’ wing of the GOP.
The front company in question was the innocuously named Mary Carter Paint Company, which operated a national chain of paint stores but was set up to function as a covert CIA money-laundering operation.
In 1958-59 Dewey and a number of associates used a reported $2 million in CIA funds to buy a controlling interest in the Crosby-Miller Corporation (headed by Dewey friend James Crosby), which was then merged with Mary Carter.
00114434
Softcover, 184 pages
Only 50 left in stock—‘When they’re gone, they’re gone!’
Among other things, the new corporation laundered CIA money for arming the anti-Castro Cuban exiles. The company also launched into lucrative casino gambling enterprises in the Caribbean where the CIA was quite active during that period, having engaged the Lansky crime syndicate in now-thoroughly documented and widely known plots to topple Fidel Castro who had enraged the mob by closing down its Cuban gambling enterprises.
Thus it should be no surprise that in 1963, Alvin I. Malnik, a top henchman of crime syndicate boss Meyer Lansky, was found to be closely connected to the operations of Mary Carter Paint.
In 1963, Mary Carter Paint spun off its paint division and during the next several years began developing its casino operations, particularly in the Bahamas. In 1967-68, Mary Carter Paint officially changed its name to Resorts International and began massive international expansion. The Spotlight determined that several principal investors provided the funds and assets for the venture:
• Meyer Lansky, the acknowledged ‘chairman of the board’ and chief financier of the underworld gambling syndicate, who maintained his own longstanding ties to not only Israel and the Mossad, but also the CIA and the American intelligence community;
• David Rockefeller, head of the Rockefeller financial empire, who provided his family’s clout and CIA and global banking connections to assist in the operation;
• The Investors Overseas Service (IOS), then the world’s largest flight-capital conglomerate, controlling assets worth $2.5 billion.
• Tibor Rosenbaum, who was not only the Mossad’s Swiss-based chief financier behind covert arms deals but also the head of the Banque De Credit Internationale of Geneva, the Lansky syndicate’s chief European money laundry; and
• Baron Edmond de Rothschild of the European banking family and a personal business partner of Rosenbaum in Rosenbaum’s Mossad-related ventures ranging far and wide; and lastly,
• William Mellon Hitchcock, one of the heirs to the Mellon family fortune (one of America’s largest private family fortunes, which, for many years, has also maintained close ties with the CIA).
Resorts International expanded by leaps and bounds and soon became one of the most profitable of all the gambling enterprises, and by 1970 the underworld figures who were running the casinos (in league with their behind-the-scenes partners) began moving to expand casino gambling in the United States.
Mob chief Lansky called a high-level meeting of gambling syndicate figures in Acapulco, Mexico and there the assembled mobsters pinpointed the fading resort of Atlantic City as their first new target. (Prior to that time, of course, the mob had already established Nevada as the only outpost of legalized gambling on U.S. soil.)
In the wake of this meeting, the resources of Resorts International were used (publicly and privately) to begin the lobbying campaign that resulted in the legalizing of gambling in Atlantic City and once the New Jersey legislature opened up the Garden State, Resorts moved in.
In 1987, upon the death of longtime CIA front man James Crosby, the nominal head of Resorts International, up-and-coming young New York real estate tycoon Donald Trump stepped into the picture and bought Crosby’s interest in the gambling empire.
Trump soon became a household name, with his colorful personality and his insistence upon naming a variety of luxury hotels, apartment houses and other commercial ventures after himself. But while the name ‘Trump’ appeared in the headlines, the names of the real movers behind Resorts International remained hidden from public view.

Michael Collins Piper was an author, journalist, lecturer and radio show host, and had spoken in Russia, Malaysia, Iran, Abu Dhabi, Japan, Canada and the U.S.

{ Add a Comment }

THE TRIAL: REGINA V ROY ARTHUR TOPHAM

TheTrialHEADERFINAL copy

Editor’s Note: With the exception of the final Charge to the Jury by B.C.S.C. Justice Butler the full transcript of the trial proceedings in the case of R V ROY ARTHUR TOPHAM from October 26, 2015 to November 12, 2015 are contained in the following pdf files.
It is suggested that these files be downloaded for future reference and in the interest of securing a permanent record of this important free speech trial in Canada.
Sincerely,
Arthur Topham
Pub/Ed
The Radical Press
Canada’s Radical News Network
‘Digging to the root of the issues since 1998’

{ Add a Comment }

Burns OregonLive from refugeFBI seige happening now!

Guys please do your part as Americans and call the Portland, Oregon FBI office and the local county sheriff office and try to get the government to stand down. 5,000 people are listening now. I just called the Portland, Oregon FBI office and asked the operator to let the concerns of the American people be know to the FBI operatives on scene at the refuge right now. We can influence what happens there tonight. Get your phone and call the FBI office in Portland, Oregon right now. Don’t make threats, just express your concerns and be polite. The lady on the phone was very polite and said she would relay our message to the FBI operatives at the refuge. This is our duty as Americans guys, we need to prevent any further bloodshed after the cold-blooded murder of LaVoy Finicum. I will provide all the numbers below.
Number for the Portland, Oregon FBI Office: (503) 224 4181 (Press 0 to speak to an operative once the automated system starts giving you the options such as Press 1, 2, 3 for…etc)
Number for the Harney County local sheriff’s department: (541) 573 6156
THE LINES ARE SWAMPED, BOTH AT THE FBI OFFICE AND SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT. CALL IN PATRIOTS. WE CAN STOP THE BLOODSHED TONIGHT.
Links to other parts to the crisis on YouTube.
Watch ‘Burns Oregon—Live from refugeFBI siege happening now! part 1’ on YouTube

Watch ‘Burns Oregon Live from refugeFBI seige happening now! part 2’ on YouTube

Watch ‘Burns OregonLive from refugeFBI seige happening now! part 3’ on YouTube

Watch ‘Burns OregonLive from refugeFBI seige happening now! part 4’ on YouTube

Watch ‘Burns OregonLive from the refugeFBI seige happening now! part 5’ on YouTube

Watch ‘Burns OregonLive from refugeFBI seige happening now! part 6’ on YouTube

Watch ‘Burns OregonLive from refugeFBI seige happening now! part 7’ on YouTube

Watch ‘Burns OregonLive from refugeFBI seige happening now! part 8’ on YouTube

Watch ‘Burns OregonLive from refugeFBI siege happening now! part 9’ on YouTube

Watch ‘Burns OregonLive from refugeFBI siege happening now! part 10’ on YouTube

Burns OregonLive from refugeFBI seige happening now! part 4
Please visit Gavin Seim’s channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCLK-K8xXz_zgUZxO2bK5miQ
YOUTUBE.COM
Joshua Lai
Joshua Lai Listening to it right now
Erin Gürel
Erin Gürel Didn’t think things would escalate like this all of a sudden.
Dawn Maria Schute
Dawn Maria Schute I live in Portland, OR!!
John Bennett
John Bennett I don’t live in the United States, what happened?
Erin Gürel
Erin Gürel Please make sure to call in!
Erin Gürel
Erin Gürel Basically the whole refuge is surrounded by FBI vehicles and armed men and the people at the compound are either saying leave (to the FBI) or kill us all.
John Bennett
John Bennett HABBENING
Pedro Ruiz Damn! The FBI has sure gone nuts. What is wrong with those people!
Erin Gürel
Erin Gürel This is what happens when the tribe controls America! They made the people become enemies of one another!
Erich Köhler
Erich Köhler Woah shit, get me up to speed what’s going down?
Erin Gürel
Erin Gürel Basically the whole refuge is surrounded by FBI vehicles and armed men and the people at the compound are either saying leave (to the FBI) or kill us all.
Erich Köhler
Erich Köhler Verdammt. Alright, I’ll get in it, and a friend of mine.
Erin Gürel
Erin Gürel Part 9 is up now guys.
Watch ‘Burns OregonLive from refugeFBI siege happening now! part 9’ on YouTube…See More

Burns OregonLive from refugeFBI siege happening now! part 9
YOUTUBE.COM
Erin Gürel
Erin Gürel Hans Pietsch
Erich Köhler
Erich Köhler Just look up The Watchmans News, it’s all one livestream!
Erin Gürel
Erin Gürel Thanks man! I found it on another channel! I’ll tag you.
Hans Pietsch
Hans Pietsch I cant watch, no data sadly
Erin Gürel
Erin Gürel Connie Cruickshank
Luke Edward Mitchell
Luke Edward Mitchell What’s happening man ?

{ Add a Comment }

B’nai Brith v. RadicalPress.com: Zionism’s Battle for Control of Canada’s Mind

Greetings Reader: The information contained in the article below, which is actually my response to the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal’s ‘offer’ to participate in a mediation process with Mr. Harvey Smarba and the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada, is of vital concern to all Canadians who take the issue of Internet Censorship seriously. As such I would strongly suggest that you do your utmost to assist me in moving this story/letter about the net in the most expedient manner possible. The next, and final stage of this Bolshevik Show Trial will be a ‘hearing’ by the CHR Tribunal which will take place within a month or two and likely conclude with a decision to try and shut down my website RadicalPress.com . Your help would be greatly appreciated.
Arthur Topham
Pub/Ed
RadicalPress.com

———————-

B’nai Brith v. RadicalPress.com: Zionism’s Battle for Control of Canada’s Mind

by Arthur Topham
January 28, 2009

Preface:

The following letter is a reply sent to Nancy Lafontant, Registry Officer and Gregory M. Smith, Registrar of the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal, a quasi-judicial federal agency now in the process of preparing for a Tribunal hearing regarding the complaint to the Canadian Human Rights Commission by Harvey Smarba and The League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada against RadicalPress.com.

The reply contains the argument put forth by RadicalPress.com owner and publisher Arthur Topham that this is a case of an intentional attack upon one of the last remaining alternative news network in Canada one willing to stand up to the Zionist-controlled media and the assorted Zionist Jewish lobby groups that hold way too much influence over Canada’s Judiciaries and governments, both federally and provincially.

The means being employed by B’nai Brith Canada is the infamous anti-hate law contained in the Canadian Human Rights Act and known as Sec. 13(1).

The RadicalPress.com publisher maintains that the Tribunal’s offer to ‘mediate’ is but a meaningless formality due to the fact than never in the history of the CHRC or the CHRT has a case been won by any of the numerous respondents who have been entrapped by this vile legal trap, one that NEVER allows the Truth to get in its way. NOT UNLESS OF COURSE YOU HAPPEN TO BE JEWISH AND PRO-ZIONIST!

The letter outlines much of the efforts by other victims of this Bolshevik bit of legislation as well as attempts by sane people across Canada to convince the federal government to toss this specious piece of pro-Zionist handiwork into the trash bin of history and at the same time dismantle all the Human Rights Commissions across Canada, be they provincial or federal. The dangers inherent in such quasi-judicial bodies has now become only too obvious at this stage of the game. [A.T.]

————————-
B’nai Brith v. RadicalPress.com: Zionism’s Battle for Control of Canada’s Mind

by Arthur Topham

January 28, 2009

To:
Nancy Lafontant
Registry Officer
And
Gregory M. Smith
Registrar

Registry Officer / Agent du greffe
Canadian Human Rights Tribunal / Tribunal canadien des droits de la personne

Ottawa, ON K1A 1J4/ Ottawa (Ontario) K1A 1J4
nancy.lafontant@chrt-tcdp.gc.ca
Telephone | Téléphone 613-947-1137
Facsimile | Télécopieur 613-995-3484
Teletypewriter | Téléimprimeur 613-563-6460
Government of Canada | Gouvernement du Canada

From:

Arthur Topham
Publisher/Editor
The Radical Press
4633 Barkerville Highway
Quesnel, B.C. V2J 6T8

January 28, 2009.

Dear Ms. Nancy Lafontant and Gregory M. Smith:

RE: Your Tribunal email letter of January 14, 2009 regarding,
Tribunal Harvey Smarba and The League for Human Rights of B’Nai Brith Canada v. Arthur Topham and RadicalPress.com
Your File: T1360/9008

Since receiving your email letter of January 14, 2009 I have given much serious thought and consideration to your ‘offer’ of mediation in the complaint filed by Mr. Harvey Smarba and The League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada against my person and my website http://www.radicalpress.com .

Contained in this somewhat lengthy reply you will find my response. Please bear in mind that what is written is done so in a spirit of honest, frank, open-minded and loving intent; designed to address and ultimately resolve in an abbreviated synopsis, the overall issue that is presently at stake in this case. Therefore, no remarks or comments of mine, regardless of their apparent harshness or levity are intended to offend, malign or denigrate any of the parties concerned, which includes the Tribunal and its members.

With respect to the entrapment legislation (which is how I interpret Sec. 13(1) of the CHR Act), whether or not there ever existed or does exist a case of its nature, wherein mediation has benefited the ‘Respondent’ at no cost to their principles, beliefs, integrity or rights I am unaware of it. Perhaps the recent one involving Harvey Smarba and The League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada v. Al Rycroft and www.PEJ.org (one set in tandem and paralleling my own) is an exception to this general rule but, not being privy to the details of said case as to whether or not any self-censorship was involved, I cannot make any definitive statement on it one way or another. I do know though that it was initiated by the same parties who have conjoined to bring about the complaint against myself and my website and that in the case of www.PEJ.org it was settled in favour of the respondent but what effect that case will have or has had upon the issue of the ultimate illegality of this specious Section of the Canadian Human Rights Act remains to be seen. It is one case shrouded in almost complete secrecy since the complaint was first laid.

What I am privy to though and acutely cognizant of, is the ultimate nature of this particular complaint and its intended purpose which, I contend, has nothing to do with the issue of ‘Hate’ or ‘anti-Semitism’ or ‘Racism’ or any of the other carefully crafted, misleading phrases and loaded terminology used by both the complainants and, tragically, your own departments within the Canadian Human Rights Commission (CHRC) and the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal (CHRT).

Obviously this issue deals with the primary, fundamental, God-given right, as contained within Canada’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms and elsewhere, to freedom of thought and speech as well as freedom of the media to publish whatever is deemed relevant as either news or views; barring of course all which currently falls within the legal parameters of Canada’s Libel laws and those whose related purpose is to prevent acts of malicious violence toward an individual or group and/or seditious acts against the government of Canada and its sovereign citizens.

As I have previously stated, both in my original Response to the CHRC Investigating officer ( http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=629 January 3, 2008 ) and in my Comments on the CHRC final Report ( see: http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=786 Sept 17/08 ), this is not a simple case of a person of ‘Jewish faith’ being personally maligned or threatened or libeled. Nor is a mundane example of some benign, benevolent society within the ranks of Canada’s multi-cultural social milieu being unduly criticized or picked on for spiteful or vexatious reasons. It is much more complex and convoluted and important, relatively speaking.

It has always been the contention of RadicalPress.com and myself, well before this case arose, that the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada is today a strongly political and vociferous pro-Zionist arm of the Mossad, the designated name for Israel’s unofficial spy network. As such its direct and full complicity with the state of Israel in their covert operations abroad and in its capacity as one of Israel’s most powerful lobby groups here in Canada, makes it de facto, an organization whose operations, both within Canada and without, are justifiably suspect and deserving of the most extreme scrutiny by the media, alternative or otherwise. I needn’t at this point go into any great detail surrounding the influence of this political lobbyist group here in Canada and its subsequent negative effect upon successive federal governments as per Canada’s role in supporting the racist, apartheid policies of the state of Israel.

As well, unlike the chain of litigations linked to former CHRC lawyer and investigator Ricardo Warmouse do to his seemingly endless quest to rid Canada of ‘Hate’, in whatever form it may manifest for him, this particular case involving Harvey Smarba and The League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada is specifically designed to censor and/or destroy a legally-registered, well-established publishing business known as The Radical Press a privately-owned entity which has been operating steadily since June of 1998 and now remains one of the very last, if not the last, alternative news sites in Canada. My guess would be that Harvey Smarba, the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada and the other Jewish lobby groups in Canada have the RadicalPress.com site posted high upon their ‘anti-Zionist endangered species’ hit list.

The reasons why the The League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada would set out to do such a thing are obvious to any impartial observer aware of the basic tenets underlying the political ideology known as Zionism. The ultimate intent of Zionism, for those unaware of it (and I must include your two departments in this assessment as well), is to subvert all sovereign governments around the world, be they democratic, socialist, fascist or communist and to draw their respective leaders into Zionism’s gigantic web of deceit; one which always tends to benefit the state of Israel. As such, its objectives pose a clear and present danger to the democratic foundation upon which Canada’s government and its social and cultural infrastructure are based.

It was for these reasons that I took it upon myself, as a dedicated, concerned, patriotic and responsible citizen of Canada to expose the disingenuous machinations of this subversive agency; one that attempts to impose itself falsely upon Canadian society as merely a ‘benevolent’ society with little more than a pious intent to assist its membership. In actual fact it is a critical component of a foreign spy network working within that context as a double agent for the state of Israel. As such it should be registered in Ottawa as a foreign lobby group rather than feigning a false ‘Canadian’ face to hide its true countenance and purpose. I say this because any Canadian, who holds their allegiance to Canada first and foremost, would not have the temerity, to accuse their fellow Canadians of spreading ‘hatred toward citizens of Israel’ in the event of any critical commentary aimed at that foreign country.

Nothing more strikingly hideous and shameful for Canada could have occurred to highlight this conviction of mine than the recent slaughter and maiming of thousands of innocent men, women and children in the Palestinian region of Gaza by the Israeli government’s military forces. Canada’s response to this immoral and illegal act of sadistic aggression against a defenseless, beleaguered people was cruelly and graphically revealed in the decision by the Harper Conservative government to give Canada’s full and unqualified support to Israel in its inhumane and unacceptable destruction of Gaza’s people and its infrastructure as clearly shown by the vote in the U.N. regarding an urgent plea for a ceasefire. Canada, ONLY Canada, to the utmost humiliation of its once good name and its moral standing in the world, rather than standing up for Truth and Justice and Freedom and the democratic ideals it professes to believe in, instead prostrated itself before the warlike foreign nation of Israel like some dumb and terrified servant. As a Canadian who fervently believes in his country and its global impression upon the rest of the world; one shown by example, I found this overt act of abject obeisance to the Israeli state to be one of the most disgusting events ever witnessed in my 62 years on this planet.

In terms of my original contention therefore, it is but one more vivid example of how political organizations such as The League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada and the Canadian Jewish Congress (CJC) and the Simon Weisenthal Center (SWC) and other Jewish lobby groups conspire (yes, sadly for some, it is a conspiracy of the highest order and not a mere theory) to use their powerful lobbying positions to influence the moral and legal decisions of Canada’s duly elected representatives so that subsequent actions which reflect upon the whole of Canada’s reputation as a peace-loving nation are subverted to the degrading partisan purposes of an alien, foreign nation; one now recognized by numbers of nations as being highly racist, apartheid, undemocratic and an imminent threat to global peace.

For emphasis once again I will reiterate the fact that this is why Harvey Smarba, acting as B.C.’s ‘agent’ for the Mossad-controlled League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada has been given the job of destroying RadicalPress.com. It is so that news and opinions contained on my website which focus upon and expose this precise issue of the dangers of Zionism to Canadian sovereignty are censored from the eyes of Canadians or anyone else outside of Canada having access to the internet.

I would also submit (once again, and as stated in my Response and Comments see above), that such was the original intent by these and other Jewish lobby groups here in Canada, when they set about creating Canada’s Human Rights Commissions which ultimately gave birth to the odious Sec. 13(1) of the CHR Act.

After the dreadful murder of three thousand American and some Canadian and other foreign citizens in the attack upon the World Trade Center September 11, 2001 evidence quickly began emerging which linked the activities of the Mossad to the event thus incriminating Israel in what now is generally accepted as being the first major false flag event of the 21st Century. In order to, but not limited as such, prevent further evidence from gaining currency around the world, Canada, within three months, quickly drew up its Anti-terrorism Act, 2001, c.41, amending the Criminal Code ostensibly to ‘combat terrorism’. Such, I suggest, was not the only intent of said legislation. In retrospect it also proved to be the precise window required by these anti-democratic, anti-free speech agents of Israel to sneak in, as per their usual subterfuge, Sec. 13(1) into the CHR Act.

Having observed, measured and covered for the past 11 years, covert activities of various nations in greater detail than the average Canadian, it is obvious to me that such a vile, specious piece of legislation, ONLY benefits the pro-Israel and pro-Zionist Jews, their Lobby, their controlled, monopoly Media and their assorted crypto-aspirants and by association identifies all of these entities with the pro-racist and pro-apartheid policies of the Israeli government. It certainly hasn’t, by any stretch of the imagination, benefitted any of the other numerous cases of non-Jews who have already been convicted under this draconian piece of legislation.

These preliminary remarks said I would now like to touch upon some other relevant Sec. 13(1) cases and related initiatives pertinent to my case before concluding this letter.

Paramount throughout the struggle to have Sec. 13(1) erased forever from the statute books of Canada has been the long and tireless effort by Mr. Marc Lemire and his lawyer Barbara Kulaszka. On November 25, 2005, they filed a constitutional challenge against Sec. 13 (see constitutional challenge of Section 13 internet censorship) http://www.stopsection13.com and Section 54 (one imposing hefty fines) of the Canadian Human Rights Act. That legal challenge dragged on in the courts until September 15-17, 2008 until final submissions were heard at a three day hearing (see: http://www.freedomsite.org/legal/Closing_submissions_constitutional-part_1.html ). A decision by the court is still pending as I write.

The case of the Jewish lawyer and former publisher of the now-defunct Western Standard magazine out of Alberta, Ezra Levant, was another example wherein the Alberta Human Rights Commission had laid charges of illegal ‘discrimination’ against Levant based upon a complaint by the Edmonton Council of Muslim Communities; one related to Levant’s publication in 2006 of the infamous Danish cartoons which were designed to denigrate the Muslim prophet Mohammed. That complaint finally concluded August 6th, 2008 with an acquittal. Levant afterwards, in a column in the National Post, told readers that, unlike the other case of Reverend Stephen Boissoin, another victim of the AHRC who was fined $7,000 and banned for life from giving sermons or even sending private e-mails that were ‘disparaging’ toward homosexuals, Levant’s case was dropped in his favour due to his contention that he had been, ‘a political pain in the neck for the HRC.’ That statement, I suggest, is both false and misleading and I maintain that the real reason why Levant was acquitted was because of the fact that he is Jewish and a supporter of the Zionist ideology.

Another example of my premise that only Jews escape the censor’s noose in Canada came soon after Mr. Lemire’s courageous constitutional challenge to Sec. 13. This one involved a provincial version of hate speech law stemming from B.C. and concerned Canadian journalist Mark Steyn and Maclean’s magazine. It concluded on October 10, 2008 with the decision that Steyn and Maclean’s had not violated B.C.’s hate speech law. Again, the point to bear in mind here is that Steyn’s case was not brought on by any of the Jewish lobby groups mentioned above but by the Canadian Islamic Congress. And, as in the case of Ezra Levant, Steyn, also being a Jew as well as a zealous, self-admitted Zionist, escaped the usual fate of non-Jewish respondents.

Next came the federal Conservative party’s policy convention in Winnipeg in November of 2008 at which time an overwhelming majority of delegates voted in favour of a resolution (P-203) to repeal Section 13 (Internet censorship provision) of the Canadian Human Rights Act. Even Canada’s Minister of Justice, Rob Nicholson voted in favor of P-203. Of course the media were quick to point out that such resolutions are not binding upon the Prime Minister and so thus far, for all the rhetoric and hype in the Zionist media and the right/left blogosphere, no definite actions have been taken to fulfill the aspirations of this majority of delegates. This of course is not meant as a slight upon the obviously sincere delegates themselves but only highlights the fact that in party politics it is the leaders and not the membership who ultimately make the final decisions.

In the immediate wake of Resolution P-203 came once again the renewed efforts of Liberal MP Keith Martin of B.C. (Esquimalt—Juan de Fuca) who had initially put forth a resolution in Parliament calling for the removal of Sec. 13 from the CHR Act back in March of 2008. On November 19, 2008 Dr. Martin introduced two new motions, M-153 and M-156. The first, M-153 states: ‘That, in the opinion of the House, subsection 13(1) of the Canadian Human Rights Act should be deleted from the Act.’ In the second, M-156, the motion states, ‘That, in the opinion of the House, the government should hold public hearings as part of a review of the Canadian Human Rights Act, the Canadian Human Rights Commission and its tribunal.’

To date, to my knowledge, no concrete action has been forthcoming with respect to these two motions.

There are other examples, too many to include here. According to Catholic Insight magazine http://catholicinsight.com/ ‘On June 17, 2008, the Canadian Human Rights Commission (CHRC) launched its own policy review of Section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act (CHRA). Section 13 (added to the Act in 2001) gives the commission the power to investigate and punish instances of ‘hate speech’ on the internet. The 59-page review, conducted by Prof. Richard Moon, an expert on constitutional law and free speech at the University of Windsor, was made public at a cost of over $1,000 a page on November 24, 2008 and is posted on the CHRC website.’ See http://www.chrc-ccdp.ca

Surprisingly, to free speech advocates as well as to the CHRC, Prof. Richard Moon recommended ‘That Section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act be repealed so that the CHRC and the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal (CHRT) no longer deal with hate speech, especially hate speech on the internet.’ The immediate reaction of the CHRC was to go into a state of denial and thus far we have not seen any significant movement on this recommendation.

Catholic Insight, a magazine out of Ontario, Canada, also a victim of charges of discrimination brought on by a peculiar species of complainant known as ‘homo-harasimus‘, also gives us additional examples of similar harassment by the CHRC. As Catholic Insight states, ‘The list of those who have unjustifiably suffered under Canada’s human rights system which Justice Minister Nicholson has described in a letter to C.I. as ’second to none’ is a long and varied one: B.C. teacher Chris Kempling; the Knights of Columbus in B.C.; Calgary Bishop Fred Henry; Alberta Pastor Stephen Boissoin; Saskatchewan’s Hugh Owens and marriage commissioner Orville Nichols; Ezra Levant in Calgary; the Christian Horizons ministry to the disabled in Ontario; Mark Steyn and Maclean’s magazine in Toronto; the mayors of a dozen Canadian cities who have been forced to proclaim ‘gay pride’ days; the FreeDominion.ca website, and more.’

You can include me and RadicalPress.com in the ‘more’ category, one which is reserved for the ‘more’ dangerous, threatening offenders such as Malcolm Ross, Terry Long, Doug Collins, the notorious non-neo-Nazi Paul Fromm and of course Canada’s ultimate shame Ernst Zundel a man who now rots away in a German prison cell thanks to the egregious machinations of the CHRC and Canada’s Zionist-controlled federal Judiciary.

To conclude:

One would think that after all that has occurred over the last few years regarding these Bolshevik ‘Show Trials’ disguised as Human Rights Tribunal hearings, that all of this would be self-evident to any intelligent person who was in a position to judge the merits of such cases. But unfortunately, logic, reason, intelligence and unbiased, objective thinking, coupled (as in my particular case), with a basic knowledge of the nature of political Zionism, do not appear to be qualities evident either within the CHRC or the CHRT. Otherwise this case would never have progressed to the stage that it now has. Instead of reason and common sense prevailing these two organizations, who have legitimately earned the ignominy of the majority of freedom-loving Canadians, continue to plod incessantly onward toward their ultimate demise seemingly oblivious to the realities that surround their robotic, immoral and unjust movements, all the while crushing more and more innocent people and organizations beneath their blundering, censorship bound Juggernaut.

And so, all that said, this brings me back to my reasons for the decision that I have made with respect to your request for a ‘yes or no’ regarding mediation with the complainants in my case. Bluntly put, (for there really is no other simple way of stating it) there is not a snowball’s chance in Hell that Harvey Smarba or The League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada would agree to any form of mediation that didn’t require RadicalPress.com agreeing to remove all its controversial articles deemed ‘hateful’ toward ‘Jews or citizens of Israel’. That is not the mandate given Harvey Smarba by the Mossad and as such it precludes any real chance of holding reasonable discussions on the matter. But even if this were the case, at this stage of the game of censorship I have long concluded that to consent in any way or fashion to the imperious demands and whims of the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada would be demeaning to myself as a patriotic Canadian and a man of integrity and a total betrayal of every principle that I’ve held dear for the vast portion of my adult life.

And so as I stated initially I did give a lot of careful consideration to my decision. I have also been given advice by others who are themselves involved in this same battle with the CHRC over Sec. 13(1) suggesting to me that should I agree to such a process, if for no other reason, it might prove advantageous in the final outcome by possibly lessening any sentencing or subsequent fine that might be imposed (just to add injury to insult). I deliberated over that possibility but concluded that morally, reasonably and spiritually it would not be a legitimate reason to subject myself to a process that must inevitably, due to its inherent internal flaws, prove futile.

Besides that it would mean agreeing to having to travel from my home up in central British Columbia, a distance of approximately 600 + km, during the winter, to attend a one-day mediation session that is predestined to fail from the start. For Harvey Smarba it’s a short trip across the strait from Victoria, B.C. and back, albeit with ferry costs, to attend the meeting and for the Tribunal member from your offices a nice, likely first class flight from Ottawa to Vancouver with all expenses paid and replete with a fancy hotel room in the West End and likely some gourmet dining and night life activity in between, all paid for by me and the rest of Canada’s taxpaying public. A tough job indeed for you I know but hey, someone has to do it I suppose for the sake of the freedom and liberty of special interest groups here in Canada determined to duct-tape the mouths of its citizens into silence and submission to Israeli interests.

I am 62 years of age. I run a seasonal business doing carpentry that ends abruptly come freeze up in the fall and doesn’t begin again until well into May when the snows recedes. In other words for about 6 months of the year I must survive on the profits of about 5 months steady employment and then for the remainder of the winter survive on a $300/month early pension payment. It hardly leaves vast extraneous sums of cash for long distance travel, hotels, meals and possible mechanical failures, let alone the hiring of any legal help. But then you are likely already well aware of this fact so I suppose I’m merely repeating myself here.

So no, I’m going to have to decline your offer of going to Vancouver even though the escape from a frozen landscape for a day or two of temperate rainforest climate would otherwise be a welcome change from the ice and snow and wood splitting.

Furthermore, had I agreed to mediation it would have been on the condition that your Tribunal member and Harvey Smarba both make the trek up to the supposed ‘scene of the crime’ and that you hold your mediation and/or your hearing in Quesnel, B.C., a location both the closest and most convenient location for me. Never forget for a moment please that it was the complainant Harvey Smarba and The League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada who instigated these spurious charges to begin with. That, in my mind, makes him and his organization responsible for coming to where they believe the supposed ‘hate crime’ was committed and face, like decent men, their accused.

Surely you ought to be able to see the soundness of my proposal. Had the mediation occurred your Tribunal member would then have had to assume the additional burden of taking a small twin-engine jet service up to Quesnel and settle for a one to three day stay in one of our local hotels or motels; facilities which offer the weary traveler their own small but earnest effort at duplicating the finest of accommodations that Vancouver has to offer. I would also have suggested some good warm woolies and a toque and warm mittens for your member. Even fleece is acceptable in this sometimes rough and tumble area of the province inhabited mostly by red-neck ranchers, loggers, miners and other assorted misfits and outlaws`. You might also have had to let the member know that weather conditions could delay their flight in and out and that he or she should allow for a few days extra time in either arriving or leaving.

So you see that in fact there is a silver lining to it all. By not agreeing to mediation I will be saving Canadian taxpayers the additional expense of flying one of your members out to B.C. As well, it will save the complainant any added costs in traveling from Victoria to Vancouver and back.

As a final kick at the cat and as a parting tribute to Canada’s foremost political prisoner Ernst Zundel, I would like to share with you a short, yet poignant anecdote, one which relates to my own case and the decision I have made respecting the proposed mediation.

During the Moscow Show trials of Lenin and Stalin (which I’m sure you are all well versed in) and also during the trials of post-war Germans at Nuremberg, a prosecutorial ploy was invariably used to silence all debate and discussion that might include actual facts and verifiable proofs or truths that might have vindicated the testimony of the victims. It became know as the principle of ‘Manifest Obviousness’ and came in very handy during the show trials of German soldiers and civilians held responsible for alleged ‘war crimes’ and the alleged ‘holocaust’ of the ‘6 million’ Jews during the war. Whenever any counter evidence arose that in any way challenged the newly-coined allegations of ‘holocaust’ and ‘gas chambers’ and ‘war crimes’ the judge would resort to using the expression ‘Manifest Obviousness’ as the final counter to any argument that the court was unable to justify with verifiable evidence. In many ways it resembles the current ploy of the CHRC and its Investigators and Tribunal with their use of the term, ‘Hallmarks of Hate’ to lend official, legal credence to an unproven set of assumptions that possess no foundation in the real world. Therefore, in the spirit of Nuremberg I would have to state that it is manifestly obvious that all of your efforts to impose legal sanctions against Canadians based upon Section 13(1) of the CHR Act are unjustifiable and venal in the worse possible sense of the term. This therefore leaves no doubt in my mind that both the Canadian Human Rights Commission and the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal should be immediately relieved of any and all power to adjudicate any matter of Canadian jurisprudence whatsoever. I say this as a concerned Canadian, a Christian and a man of principle.

Let us therefore drop the pretension of justice and proceed to the next stage of this mock trial of a free and independent Canadian. On with the show! Let the Tribunal hearing begin! (But again, please bear in mind that I would expect you to hold it in Quesnel, B.C.)

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Shine your Light for Love & Peace & Justice for All,

Arthur Topham
Pub/Ed
The Radical Press
Canada’s Radical News Network
radical@radicalpress.com
http://www.radicalpress.com
‘Digging to the root of the issues since 1998’

{ Add a Comment }

The Political Assassination of LaVoy Finicum by Dr. Anthony Hall

LaVoyFinicumHdrFINAL

Hall’s Update: The Duff/Dean version to confuse my essay’s introduction is not consistent with Victoria Sharp’s eyewitness testimony given to North West Liberty News
[ Editor’s update: A witness that was stopped and arrested in the first car refutes the allegations made in this early reporting of an execution with his hands up in the air. Finicum had run the first road block, and was not fired upon, and crashed into a snowbank while trying to run the backup road block.
He exited the car and charged the officers and was shot then. This witness was at a distance himself but I suspect we will have video camera evidence of both stops as that is routine now in these situations where both parties want proof of what happened.
The rest of everyone stopped are alive. Those with warrants were arrested and the released. I am sure we will be hearing more about this in the next few days. For my two cents these folks should have been aware that some sort of arrest could be expected and should have had a game plan to move the dispute into the courts, as will happen now. Any kind of shooting served neither the government’s position nor those arrested, injured or killed. The legal process will not churn on it what will be a high profile case…Jim W. Dean ]
https://www.rt.com/usa/330365-oregon-lavoy-shooting-police/
by Anthony Hall,Canada
According to a report on his own You Tube channel, LaVoy Finicum was killed on the evening of January 26, 2016 by a US special forces unit while the deceased Arizona rancher ‘was on his knees with his hands up.’
Finicum is said to have been shot ‘three times’ in an episode that also included the arrest on Highway 395 in Oregon of some of the leadership of the Citizens for Constitutional Freedom. Nevada Assembly woman Michele Fiore also reported in a tweet that Finicum was shot by federal authorities with his hands up.
Screen-Shot-2016-01-27-at-10.14.51-PM

In a more recent report, North West Liberty News published an interview with Victoria Sharp who was in the ‘ambushed’ car carrying the targeted entourage with LaVoy Finicum at the wheel. She said that Finicum was shot six extra times by special forces police after he was already downed by police gunfire.
Sharp confirmed that Finicum was initially shot outside the car with his hands in the air. She dismissed the story of three bullets being shot as bunk and indicated that at least 120 shots were fired at the car. She spoke of about 4o police vehicles being involved in the ambush with ‘FBI snippers’ posted
Screen-Shot-2016-01-28-at-1.02.53-AM-1-372×640
everywhere, including on perches in surrounding trees.
The group had left the camp of the armed protestors that took control of the federal building overseeing the Federal Malheur Wildlife Reservation. The entourage, including Ammon Bundy and Ryan Bundy who was wounded in the episode, was on their way to address a meeting in the Oregon community of John Day. Police reportedly apprehended a second group in an episode that at this moment remains ill defined.
Inevitably Finicum’s death will be viewed by many as a political assassination by a US federal government that has become accustomed to extrajudicial killing all over the world. A veteran of the controversial standoff at Cliven Bundy’s ranch in Nevada in 2014, Finicum was emerging as a compelling voice for a movement that some see as a patriotic defence of the rule of law in the United States. Where some see freedom fighters, others see droves of coddled terrorists cut way too much slack by the federal authorities.
A member of the Church of Jesus of Latter-day Saints who grew up on the Navajo Reservation in the Four Corners area of the American West, Finicum was fast acquiring prominence as a go-to person by journalists covering the evolving standoff. Again and again Finicum threw out sound bites addressing in an usually clear way major issues whose scope goes far beyond the immediate issues of federal regulation of ranchers on federal lands in the American West. Finicum made history, for instance, when he commented eloquently on his own filmed removal of a spy camera from a lamp post in the vicinity of the protest camp.
After coming down from the ladder with the spy camera in hand, Finicum fended off pressures from his fellow protesters to destroy the expensive spy device. He made a point of letting it be known the spy ware would be sent back to the appropriate authorities in Washington DC. The symbolic importance of this ritual on contested federal lands is obvious during an era when Edward Snowden must live in exile in Russia, ruthlessly criminalized for exposing the pervasive, permeating, privacy-obliterating illegality of the national security states quickly expanding apparatus for ‘Total Information Awareness.’
LaRoySpyCameraImage
Confounding the ‘Progressive Left’s Stereotypes of Militia Members as Ignorant Red Neck Bigots
Most interesting to me was Finicum’s success in confounding the ‘progressive’ left’s stereotypes of of militia members as ignorant Red Neck bigots. Citing his experiences growing up on the Navajo Reservation, Finicum made it very clear he well understood that the federal Bureau of Indian Affairs applies to America’s Indian reservations many of the same repressive indignities visited on many non-Indian citizens by the Interior Department’s deeply corrupt and politicized Bureau of Land Management. The image cannot be easily brushed aside of LaVoy Finicum declaring days before his death, ‘The Native American People Need to Be Free…. The Tribes Need to Be Free.’
LaVoyFreeNativePeople
The symbolic sinew of Finicum’s outreach to the First Nations was his inspection of the deplorable conditions of the First Nations ‘artifacts’ being held in the dank basement in federal headquarters of the Malheur Wildlife Reservation. Finicum made it clear that the artifacts should be ‘returned to their rightful owners.’ Why should this collection of First Nations material culture be ‘locked away’ apart from the communities who properties they most genuinely are.
From these comments Finicum demonstrated his familiarity with the ‘repatriation’ discourse among First Nations people. As this discourse has unfolded, museums around the world have been returning to their true owners material items such as ceremonial pipes, implements and regalia. The giving back of these embodiments of distinct heritages and cultures of Indigenous peoples signifies respect for living societies trying to secure places in the future by claiming for their posterity the material evidence of their own histories.
Finicum repeatedly called for representatives of Native Americans to come forward to begin a dialogue transcending the Hollywoodized mythology of cowboys and Indians. Finicum’s apparent sensitivity to the need for dialogue with Native Americans was part of a plea to find common ground in order to host and support a rainbow confederacy of constituencies all imperilled by an out-of-control federal juggernaut menacing the entire global community in this era of never-ending 9/11 wars.
Finicum made a point of telling the cameras that he and those for whom he was speaking are not ‘anti-government.’ Rather it has been the failure of the federal authority to adhere to even its own laws that has made it necessary for the creation of a mass movement of citizens opposed to the imposition of various forms of tyranny from above. As Finicum declared in the hours before his death, ‘This is not just a little occupation. This is a mass movement involving tens of millions of people.’
LaRoyStatement2media
In my estimation Finicum was way too conservative in assessing the true extent of those who have lost all confidence that the federal authority in the USA, or in my own country of Canada for that matter, has any chance of redemption under current conditions. Like some of the leading activists of the Occupy movement, Finicum seemed well aware of the reality that the federal government of the United States has been taken over by a tiny cabal perfectly prepared to advance its interests through fascism, genocide, eugenics, forced migrations, geoengineering and banking frauds.
This list of federal malevolence and malfeasance is far from complete. Under our current conditions only a popular mobilization on a massive scale, capable of transcending many different types of divide and conquer tactics, has a chance of holding back the onslaught. This onslaught of debt enslavement, militarization and environmental holocaust is being forced upon us by an extremely elaborate, old and well organized criminal gang that has rendered the federal authority of the world’s ailing superpower as a blunt weapon exclusively available for its own disposal.
Assassination or Suicide?
LaVoy Finicum& wife Jeannette
Finicum’s death is already raising bitter controversies even before his body is buried. SeniorVeterans Today Editor, Gordon Duff, has already suggested Finicum’s killing by federal bullets amounted to ‘suicide by cop.’ This characterization of Finicum’s death introduces a meme that will probably reverberate across media venues of the controlled opposition. It is true that Finicum spoke openly about his unwillingness to be incarcerated in ‘a concrete box.’ Going from there to making Finicum the author of his own death, however, is a huge leap for the veteran special forces expert to make. Such a judgement, while the body is literally still warm, raises the ante of interpretation concerning the death of a person who will almost certainly be regarded as a martyr taken down in defence of a higher ideal.
LAVOYPHOTO
Cliven Bundy, the Nevada-based patriarch of the US movement of which Finicum was a part, left no doubt of where he stands on the federal killing. The owner of the Nevada ranch at the eye of the conflict with the Bureau of Land Management in 2014 asserted, ‘It appears that America was fired upon by our government. One of liberties finest patriots is fallen… We’ve got one killed and I can say he was sacrificed for a good purpose.’
LaVoy&Daughter
The killing is throwing up huge controversies for the USA’s Utah-headquartered Mormon Church that has many of its members involved in various capacities with the libertarian militia movement. How will this rich and successful religious denomination respond? In this election year, how will many right-wing politicians, including Donald Trump, respond to the death of such an iconographic family man, the natural and foster patriarch of a large extended mormon clan? Is Mitt Romney or LaVoy Finicum a better embodiment of Mormon family values, of idealized patriotism growing out of love of country?
Mormon broadcaster Jake Morphonios has already disagreed with the Church establishment’s ruling that the Citizens for Constitutional Freedom are operating outside acceptable Mormon behaviour. For Morphonios, the CCF was engaged in the Nevada and Oregon standoffs in ‘a legitimate self-defence against an aggressive and abusive bureaucracy that is far outside the rule of law.’
LaVoyRIP
Paul Craig Roberts versus Russia Today
Another emerging controversy over the meaning of Finicum’s death was foreshadowed in disagreement between conservative American pundit, Paul Craig Roberts, and Russia Today. Emphasizing, for instance, the huge implications of the 9/11 false flag event, Israeli domination of US foreign policy, and the undermining of America’s worldwide interests by a kleptocratic banking cabal based on Wall Street and the City of London, Roberts welcomed the militia stand in Oregon as a part of a necessary resistance to the grotesque neocon abuse of federal power.
DON’TTREADONME
Roberts criticized Russia Today for looking away from this larger picture and emphasizing instead the disparity of police treatment between the public demonstration by the protestors at the Black Lives Matter demonstration in Ferguson Missouri and the arms bearing ‘ranchers’ who have gathered at the Malheur Wildlife Reservation. While the racism of the US police state was certainly a factor in the contrast, Roberts pointed out how this slant in coverage plays right into the divide-and-conquer agenda of the likes of American plutocrat George Soros.
It is well known that Soros funds the completely compromised and ineffective so-called ‘peace’ movement. Multi-billionaire Soros also funded the so-called colour revolutions that laid the foundations for the Ukranian-Russian divisions presently pushed and exploited by NATO. It is less well known that Soros is also busily funding the Black Lives Matter movement. It seems that all is well with the dominant global cabal of organized crime as long as potential opponents of their bought-and-paid-for devices of pseudo-democratic government are sliced and diced into as many isolated fragments as possible.
Militia Fanatics or Average Americans Standing Up to Fascism?
Gordon Duff is utterly contemptuous of the ‘Bundy/Oregon militia,’ alleging that its members are subject to a plague of ‘race hatred, religious extremism and tasteless ignorance.’ No doubt the group Duff thus dismisses does have some factions and members that display some of these symptoms of extremism in varying degrees. How could it be otherwise in an American failed state permeated with racism, religious extremism, and forms of ignorance that are aggressively and insidiously promoted by a media culture that profits hugely from the dissemination of disinformation and round-the-clock PR bullshit.
But who of us is without sin? What religious extremist was it that said something like, ‘let he who is without sin cast the first stone?’ Are we only
Screen-Shot-2016-01-27-at-11.31.25-PM-320×218
Gordon Duff Being Interviewed on Kevin Barrett’s Truthjihad
qualified to work for revolutionary transformation of our present intolerable conditions when we follow Gordon Duff’s lead in rising above all the foibles and weaknesses inherent in the societies around us?
Part of Duff’s criticism is based on probably-true accusations that the group in and around the Wildlife Reservation protest camp is riddled with undercover federal agents. This observation itself, however, should speak to the covert thuggery of a federal authority that has removed from the vast majority of citizens the protections of social security and the rule of law including due process for the redress of grievances. The domestic and international versions of the national security state are all in place, at huge expense to us, so that no true movement for genuine redress can even get off the ground before the instruments of Full Spectrum Dominance kick in.
The name Pete Santilli seems to come up often when possible undercover agents are mentioned in this context. Santilli is the You Tube-making blogger of the protest camp who was apparently among those arrested. One could observe the great gulf between the positions of Santilli and of LaVoy Finicum. Shortly before his death Finicum vowed that the federal building on the Wildlife Reservation will never be returned to Washington. He spoke of it being handed over instead to the local Harney County government.
This statement of intent contrasts dramatically with a You Tube of Santilli at the height of the crisis driving along somewhere in Oregon looking from time to time into the camera. He speaks into the recording device advising the FBI to hold back from attacking the protest camp said to be full of women and children. A female voice in the car echoes this caution. As justification for this advise, Santilli declares his intent to go to the camp and clear it out of inhabitants.
Finicum himself described the build up of spy planes and spy drones over the camp in the hours before the mobilization of federal actions that led to his death. He anticipated ‘kinetic action’ on the part of the feds stating, ‘I have no intention of spending my days in a concrete box. There are things more important than your life and freedom is one of them.’
‘Helpingmind,’ the nom de plume of one the commentators on Duff’s Veterans Today article observed, ‘Militia my ass. They are mostly average Americans who know we are very close to fascism via false flag reaction psychosis around the world… The core group is mirrored by 10s of millions in America alone and their take on the entity in DC is that it is a fascist immoral ‘criminal mob’—- Your words Mr. Duff’

{ Add a Comment }