[Editor’s Note: As I wrote on FB: “I started watching Stefan Molyneux’s latest video titled “The Truth About McCarthyism: Modern Parallels” last night. Due to my lame satellite “High Speed” (not) internet service from Xplornet the video began to “embed” after about 30 seconds and I knew I’d have to wait for awhile before starting to view it without interruptions. So I began reading the comments section and spent about two hours doing that. By that time the video had embedded itself enough that I was able to start viewing it. The kicker is the show is 31/2 hours long! For someone who usually doesn’t watch videos over 15 minutes this was a bit of a radical change for me but of course I’ve studied the history of Joseph McCarthy extensively some years ago and so my interest level was very high. Thus far I’m into it one hour and 20 minutes and barring the odd comments that I might not agree with the overall bulk of Stefan’s presentation is amazingly well done and so I’m willing to post it here for those who take history seriously and wish to understand the 20th century in greater detail. Please share this important information.”]
Posted on 11/27/2016
They say deaths of famous people happens in threes. I have some suggestions in this cartoon for the other two.
A murdering, despicable tyrant named Fidel Castro is dead. He inflicted communism on Cuba, which he and his brother ran with an iron fist.
Castro lived to an overripe old age. Many dictators live long lives because they love power. Gollum in “The Lord of the Rings” couldn’t die as long as he possessed the Ring of Power. Even when he lost it he couldn’t die because he still lusted for the ring. It’s the same principle with tyrants. Some years ago I read a biography titled “Mao, The Unknown Story,” written by Jung Chang. When Mao was finally about to die, he resented it mightily. Not necessarily because he feared death. What he really resented was losing his power. He absolutely loved it. He was obsessed with power. So was Castro.
The globalist cabal includes old men such as Henry Kissinger, George Soros, David Rockefeller and many more. All these ancient creatures cling to life, power, influence and money. It’s as if they want to hang around long enough to see their globalist dreams come true.
The war criminal known as Henry Kissinger is a notorious figure who pushes the New World Order. He has contempt for humanity—he considers most people to be ‘useless eaters.’ Rockefeller is over 100 years old and worth many billions of dollars. He’s had multiple heart transplants. He’s more a ghoul than a human being. He’s proud to be part of a secret cabal bent on dominating the world. Or it could be he knows he can’t take his many billions of dollars with him, so he’s decided to stay on Earth permanently. Soros persistently pumps money into strategies that bring strife and division to America. He thinks a broken America can be made to accept the new world order—with Soros being one of those in charge and administering it. Currently he’s busy funding those who want to challenge Trump’s legal election.
What these people want is collectivism for humanity. It can also be called communism. They don’t really care what it’s called as long as humanity is united and enslaved under their whip. The cabal is getting more desperate which makes them more dangerous. They want to shut down free speech on the Internet. They know their propaganda arms known as the mainstream media are being held in contempt by most Americans.
These monsters can’t live forever and people are waking up.
Don’t rest in peace, Castro. You certainly don’t deserve it.
For more on Fidel Castro, listen to this excellent video by Stefan Molyneux:
Four Ways to Support Ben Garrison Cartoons
You can become a monthly donor on Patreon for as little as a dollar a month!
Make a one time Pay Pal donation
Buy a T-shirt and more at the GrrrGraphics TeeSpring Shop
Purchase signed Prints / Original Art in the Shop
Ammon Bundy Demands His Right To Be Heard in Portland Courtroom Judge Loses Her Composure by Pete Santilli Show
Ammon Bundy Demands His Right To Be Heard in Portland Courtroom Judge Loses Her Composure
by Pete Santilli Show
HER COURT WAS OUT OF ORDER
High drama is what took place in the Portland Courtroom of Judge Anna Brown today when once again Ammon Bundy refused to sit down when being ordered to do so after she denied his motion for a continuance. The judge said she couldn’t grant the Bundy brothers a delay without a showing that the two, who had initially insisted on a trial starting in April and opposed the court’s designation of the case as complex, couldn’t prepare for trial within the next nine weeks. She found it difficult to accept that the Bundy brothers — the “loud and clear leaders in this case from the beginning” — wouldn’t have time to prepare for trial by Sept. 7 and rejected their motions for any delay.
The room was filled with animosity between Brown, Ammon Bundy, and Bundy’s attorney Marcus Mumford. That tension quickly escalated into a dramatic confrontation between Bundy and the Judge, said one courtroom observer. A shouting match ensued between the two that caused the Judge to lose her composure and briefly lose control of the courtroom when the gallery full of supporters joined Mr. Bundy in his reprimand of the Judge.
Ammon stood up and just started to speak when the Judge shouted at him to sit down. Speak to me through your attorney, she said. She rose to her feet flailing her arms and was yelling at him — Her face was pretty red and full of anger – She was visibly pissed off – Ammon was yelling back at her telling her that it was unfair that he was always being told to shut-up and sit down. He was tired of being told to be quiet and having his right to be heard dismissed by her — Then it felt like the whole courtroom kind of joined in the yelling — the Marshalls were all on their feet and took someone out — it got pretty crazy there for a second —
To regain control of herself and the proceeding, Brown cleared the courtroom by calling a brief recess and shortly after returned to continue with the “ex parte hearing” without the Government or spectators. That hearing is said to have gone better.
Several other things were brought to light in today’s hearing as well as the Judge and Ammon Bundy’s apparent lack of patience for one another; Shawna Cox told the Court she was ready to part with her attorney and join the ranks of Ryan Bundy and a few others by representing herself when the trial gets underway.
Peter Santilli and his attorney Tom Coan were told by the Prosecution, they will not be calling witness Kevin Johnson to the stand during Santilli’s portion of the trial. Kevin Johnson is the man who falsely told the FBI he saw Mr. Santilli at a December 22nd “Committee Of Safety” meeting in Burns, Oregon where the takeover of the Refuge was allegedly first planned. Pete Santilli was overheard telling the prosecutor, “Good, — maybe we will call him to testify against you then.”
Oral arguments for the second round of motions were set to begin on July 18th, and a tentative time table for the trial itself was also set. Prosecutors are saying the Government will need at least 3-4 weeks to present their case in full, while the defense is estimating roughly 3 -5 days per defendant to get through their portion of the trial.
Nothing was said today about how long jury selection would be expected to take once it begins on September 7th, 2016. Judge Brown has noted they have 1,000 potential jurors from counties surrounding and including Multnomah County, where the trial is set to take place.
The Government also released a list to the defense today which contains the names of 111 people which mostly consists of with-held names of FBI agents and law enforcement whom they plan [to use to some capacity] their various cases for their case against the defendants. True to their word kevin Johnson’s name was not on that list.
However, there is one surprise on the list; found among names like Sheriff David Ward, Steven Grasty and no name FBI agents – was the name Glen Palmer, the Sheriff of Grant County.
The state Department of Justice opened an investigation this past March into Palmer, who faces nine complaints, some from government employees, accusing him of promoting a personal agenda “over the welfare and safety of the general public he is sworn to protect. Many are claiming government pressure on Palmer has been oppressive after threatening to end his career in law enforcement. Others have expressed that they cannot imagine him being a cooperative witness for the Government. We reached out to Sheriff Palmer and as of the filing of this report we had received no comment.
Other names included were Chad and Rhonda Kargas – Husband and wife team working for the BLM and Fish and Wildlife respectfully.
Another interesting person on the list is Kieran Suckling. Kierán Suckling is a founder and the executive director of the Center for Biological Diversity and known agitator whom Carol Bundy, will quickly tell you is the group that started this fight between them and the BLM in 2014.
Suckling came to the Malheur Refuge to protest the Occupation and almost incited a riot according to some witnesses. Suckling is disliked by many, including some of his peers who say Suckling has done more harm than good in the environmental movement.
Ted Williams is proud of his credentials as an environmental provocateur and he uses those credentials to defend his criticism of Center for Biological Diversity in an article in High Country News (1). He expresses his opinion that CBD is motivated by money. He points out that CBD has filed hundreds of suits against the federal government, using environmental laws, such as the Endangered Species Act, and that every time it wins it collects attorney fees from the federal government. The cost and number of these suits has become a major obstacle to US Fish & Wildlife and the Environmental Protection Agency in fulfilling their mandate to protect rare species.
Suckling has his own ideas about how he and the CBD will rule the world someday according to milliontrees.me – an environmental group dedicated to saving trees in the San Francisco Bay area : If you read the article we have attached here Suckling even goes so far to say that his group hopes to ban all foreign trees from being planted in America and get rid of what is already here by hunting them down and burning them all to the ground.
Mr. Suckling implies that CBD’s control of the environment is only temporary until the new order is established in which plants and animals are in control. This reminds us of a similar fantasy about a new social and economic model which was originally proposed by Karl Marx. In creating the concept of communism, he envisioned a temporary dictatorship of elites which would eventually be ceded to a “dictatorship of the proletariat.” The world has now witnessed many attempts to install communism as the governing economic model, but we have not seen the dictatorship of elites willingly cede their power to the people.
This quote of CBD’s Executive Director from Ted Williams’ article, also helps us to understand why CBD sues the federal government to achieve their goals:
“’They [employees of federal agencies] feel like their careers are being mocked and destroyed—and they are,’ he told the High Country News. ‘So they become much more willing to play by our rules.’” In other words, suing—and the threat of suit—is CBD’s means of controlling the federal agencies that are responsible for protecting the environment, i.e., forcing them to do what CBD wants.
Please consider donating at the top of the page.
David Duke Responds to CNN – Speaks to Trump & All Americans
Did Donald Trump refuse to repudiate the endorsement of the Ku Klux Klan? Nope. Did Donald Trump refuse to repudiate the endorsement of former Ku Klux Klan member David Duke? Nope. Is the media creating another biased and inaccurate attack in an attempt to discredit Republican Presidential Candidate Donald Trump. Yep.
Bolshevik/Zionist Hate Propaganda laws must be repealed RadicalPress.com Public Service Announcement
Zionist Jew Lobby B’nai Brith Canada Attacks Buddhist Truth Revealer Brian Ruhe
They say that the Devil never rests and in the case of Canada’s rabid Zionist Jew lobby organization B’nai Brith Canada truer words were never spoken.
Not wishing to await the outcome of the upcoming trial of R v Roy Arthur Topham set to commence on October 26th, 2015 – the result of which will play heavily into whether or not the pro-Israeli, Zionist lobbyist will have been successful in using their Sec. 319(2) “Hate Propaganda” legislation, which they successfully embedded into Canadian jurisprudence in order to censor and suppress any and all legitimate criticism of their nefarious political ideology and their detestable terrorist, racist supremacist actions in Palestine and around the world – the Zionists are continually combing the Internet here in Canada trolling with vehement and fanatical Simon Wiesenthal “Nazi-hunting” fervour for more truth seekers who are courageously revealing the plethora of lies that the Zionist controlled msm has been mind-controlling the masses with for the past century.
There are more victims of Zionist misfeasance in former democratic Canada than the recent case of Buddhist author and teacher Brian Ruhe of Vancouver, B.C., the foremost being that of Vancouver’s Chinese artist and writer Joe Canuck whose two websites www.joecanuck.net and www.joecanuck.wix.com/justiceforchinese were both surreptitiously and summarily silenced and removed from the net by the server www.wix.com without explanation to the owner, but for now I will focus on Ruhe as his woes are well documented.
What is rather unique about this latest provocation by the Zionist Jew control freaks from B’nai Brith Canada is that they usually spend their time and taxpayer’s money attacking Christians who they feel they can accuse of spreading “hate” toward their self-chosen tribe of spiritual delinquents in order to have their victim’s tossed in the slammer for a couple of years and their websites either taken down and/or, as in the recent case of Canada’s coffee and donut franchise Tim Hortons, if nothing else, at least have their sites blocked from access by the general public.
These Talmudic Marxist Bolshevik Communist inspired censors from B’nai Brith Canada are relentless and deeply disturbed individuals – their insecurity and paranoia being paramount and the transparency of their actions blatantly obvious in every act they perform. Rather than openly debating those who criticize aspects of their own ideological foundations and proving them wrong they prefer to use their “power of the purse” and their undue political, legal and media influence to simply vilify and slander their intellectual opponents and in the process do anything they can to discriminate against and harass them and destroy their financial means of survival.
In the case of Vancouver based Buddhist teacher Brian Ruhe, rather than attempt to have him charged with a Sec. 319(2) “Hate Propaganda” Criminal Code of Canada offence, they’ve decided to do everything in their power to both discredit his good name amongst his employers and destroy his livelihood at all costs. This is the first instance that I’ve heard of where they are working their vile black sorcery behind the scenes in order to destroy the reputation and good will of a recognized and practising Buddhist. Once again living proof that their Talmudic mindset has absolutely no regard for any other religions or beliefs besides its own supremacist, racist ideology.
Readers who have been following my own case in the courts over the past 9 years of litigation brought on by this same notorious group of self-deluded sycophants for the state of Israel will know that recently I was interviewed on video by Brian Ruhe while in Vancouver early this year while looking after my dying brother. The purpose of the interview was to assist me in raising awareness about Canada’s disgusting, unjust “Hate Crime” legislation (Sec. 318 to 320 CCC) which the Zionist Jew lobby was directly responsible for creating for their own self-serving purposes as well as helping me to raise funds for my upcoming trial this October.
Meeting Brian for the first time in the flesh it was easily discernible to me that here was another individual who had finally, through his own researching and seeking, come to the full realization that all we had been told and taught about world history over the past century was twisted and warped beyond comprehension by the Zionist Jew media acting in and through all of its shape-shifting aspects, be they academia, Hollywood movies, books, magazines, radio stations, tv news and the Zionist newspaper monopoly.
Brian Ruhe is the author of two well-known and loved books on Buddhism. His first work, Freeing the Buddha, pictured below was published in March of 1998.
Brian’s second work, A Short Walk On An Ancient Path, came out in 2010 accompanied, as in his first work, with many positive reviews.
Upon reading the book reviews and accolades it was quite apparent that Brian Ruhe was/is a well loved and respected Buddhist meditation instructor. He had moved to Vancouver back in 1980 from Ontario where he’d studied business and philosophy at Brock University. Following a few years stint as a financial planner Brian’s inner quest for greater spiritual understanding finally moved him to begin his search for a deeper understanding of life. Like many of his generation he was drawn to Buddhism because of its focus upon the mind and the age-old practise of seeking within one’s own being for the truths that the soul eternally strives to attain.
Brian’s path led him to a Tibetan Buddhist centre in Vermont, USA that had been founded by the world reknowned Buddhist teacher Chögyam Trungpa. From there he traveled to Thailand where he continued his spiritual efforts for the next four years and was trained to be a meditation instructor. Brian eventually returned to Canada in order to begin sharing his teachings with others.
It wasn’t coincidental nor did it require any amount of foresight to realize that while in conversation with Brian at his Kitsilano apartment in Vancouver during the course of our interview we openly discussed the prospect that it was merely a matter of time before he would, in all likelihood, like myself, soon show up on B’nai Brith Canada’s radar screen and the attack upon his name and work would commence. In fact, it wasn’t long after doing the video with Brian I learned from him that he was being attacked front, left and center by the Zionist forces embedded throughout our pro-Israel, Jewish-influenced cultural institutions.
Of course, as per usual, it began with a Zionist Jew “Lama” (try wrapping your mind around that one!) by the name of “Tsewang” who phoned Brian at his home and threatened to call B’nai Brith Canada (BBC) and report him. Once he did that B’nai Brith’s Victoria based sayan operative* wrote to the Vancouver Parks Board and had Brian fired from teaching at (four) community centres.
On Sept. 14th Mr. Ruhe did get fired from the Roundhouse Community and Arts Centre. When this despicable act occurred Brian Ruhe phoned the sayan agent in Victoria, B.C. and spoke to him. The BBC operative told Brian “I don’t think you’re qualified to teach.” He then threatened to contact the Vancouver Police force and register a complaint of harassment against Mr. Ruhe for actually having the chutzpah to call him on the telephone to discuss his rash and hateful behaviour!
Following word of his dismissal Brian also wrote a letter to Craig Giles – President of the Roundhouse Community and Arts Centre stating in part,
“As the president of the association you are in a leadership position in our community and it doesn’t make sense that someone in Victoria should tell you how to do your job. Were you under pressure from any quarters to fire me? Did City Manager Penny Ballem have anything to do with this?
I have taught meditation for 16 years at the Roundhouse since 1999 with over 1000 people taking my classes there in groups from 5 to 25. This has helped a lot of people and I have a good reputation with these students. I’ve always enjoyed working with the staff and have had a very good relationship with them all these years. I have booked Tuesday nights here and now it’s too late to work somewhere else for the fall term.
This is a larger issue of freedom of speech in Canada. I was fired for using my freedom of speech in my YouTube videos where I discuss truth search themes about geopolitical power in the world and 20th century history. I didn’t discuss these views in my meditation classes, I was not accused of doing so and there were no complaints from the students in my classes. I feel that I am showing a high moral standard by speaking out for the benefit of humanity. Our country was founded on the fundamental principle of freedom of speech and our forefathers fought for the freedoms that you and I have today. You are in a leadership position so I ask you to consider this and write back to me with your thoughts on this please.
Thank you kindly,
So that in a nutshell is what is now happening here in Canada when anyone decides to question the Zionist Jewish narrative whether it be their “Holocaust Hoax” of the 20th Century, their actions in Gaza against the indigenous true Semitic people of Palestine, their media control over Canada and the West, or any number of other facets of the Zionist paradigm that the Jews subject their host societies to in order to maintain their power base throughout the Western world.
Brian Ruhe’s experience is not new. Je Suis Brian Ruhe! There have been dozens of other Canadians before him (including yours truly) who have suffered the slings and arrows of outrageous falsehood by the political machinations of this tribe of psychopathic deviants willing to go to any length to prevent the world from knowing the truth about their dark and sinister agenda for total global control of the world’s resources, both natural and human.
In a very real sense this is the essence of all that I have fought against over the past nine years of ongoing litigation brought on by this power-crazed Rothschild Freemasonic organization known as B’nai Brith Canada. It began on Valentine’s Day February 14th, 2007 when this same deluded maniacal sayan first sent me an unsolicited email using a phoney alias “Brian Esker” accusing me of being an “anti-Semite” and demanding that I stop publishing articles on the Zionist Jews and remove the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion from my website.
Come October 26th, 2015 here in Quesnel’s Supreme Court we will see whether or not these past nine years of harassment, intimidation, arrest, incarceration and theft of my personal computers, files and firearms will end with a victory for freedom of speech in Canada and a loss for the likes of this traitorous foreign lobby group B’nai Brith Canada and their sleazy serpentine zombie trolls. If it doesn’t then we will all be held hostage to these alien enemy interlopers who’ve been destroying our nation and culture for the past century and the country will be torn further and further apart as they once again destroy another gentile nation in their heinous game of power and control over humanity.
Justice must and Will prevail.
* [Editors Note: I am restricted by a court order from publishing the name of this B’nai Brith agent.]
Please help out with my upcoming Sec. 319(2) “Hate Propaganda” trial in October by making a donation.
Donations can be made online via my GoGetFunding site located at http://gogetfunding.com/canadian-publisher-faces-jail-for-political-writings/ or else by sending cash, cheques or Money Orders to the following postal address. Please make sure that any cheques or Money Orders are made out to – Arthur Topham – and sent to:
4633 Barkerville Highway
The Imperialism of Jewish Capital
August 22, 2015
By 1864, 150 years ago, the wealth of the world already was concentrated in the hands of the Jewish central banking cartel.
“This Money Power of the Money Quarter of London is
the only grand pre-eminent Imperialism existing on the earth.”
Updated from Sept. 25, 2007
by Henry Makow Ph.D.
A book published in 1889 “The Red Dragon” by L.B. Woolfolk suggests to me that British (and American) imperialism originated in the need of Jewish bankers and their Gentile confederates to translate money they could create out of nothing (thanks to their control of credit), into real wealth i.e. world ownership.
The book confirms my assertion that “the Jewish Conspiracy is British Imperialism.” (May 2004)
When these bankers finagled a credit monopoly in England in 1694, they turned into a monster that now has highjacked humanity. The London-based banking cartel literally has gobbled up the planet, and will not be content until it owns everything, and enslaves mankind, mentally and spiritually, if not physically. This, in a nutshell, is the New World Order.
The last push came from a secret society that Cecil Rhodes started in 1891 to “absorb the wealth of the world” and “to take the government of the whole world.”
A recent UN study says 2% of the world’s population own 50% of the wealth, while half own barely 1% of the wealth. Needless to say, the richest 2% are mainly the London-based bankers and people associated with them.
Today British, American and Zionist imperialism manifest the banker agenda for “world government” through the destruction of religion, nation, race and family. This imperialism does not express the interests or wishes of ordinary English, American or Jewish people who have themselves been colonized.
THE RED DRAGON
L.B. Woolfolk was an American Baptist preacher who traced the machinations of the banking cartel in the decades after the Civil War. He confirmed his assertions by contacts with members of this cartel during visits to London . He says “the Great Red Dragon” is the symbol of the “Jew London Money Power.”
In his book, which is on line, he describes how this cartel bought up the US economy through intermediaries, and controlled it long before the passage of the Federal Reserve Act in 1913.
By 1864, 150 years ago, Woolfolk claims the wealth of the world already was concentrated in their hands.
“The Imperialism of Capital to which I allude is a knot of capitalists–Jews almost to a man–who make their headquarters in the Money Quarter of London, in Threadneedle street, Lombard, and other streets in that vicinity, where bankers have their habitat.
These Jew capitalists have succeeded in centralizing in their own hands the industry and commerce of the earth. –They own almost all the debts of the world, –the debts of nations, states, counties, municipalities, corporations and individuals, –amounting in the aggregate, it is estimated, to seventy-five billion dollars, on which they are annually receiving about four billion dollars of interest. –They own the manufactories, the shipping, and the commerce of Great Britain, and most of the manufactures, shipping and commerce of the whole world. –They have attained control of the industry and trade of the whole earth; and are rapidly centralizing all business in their own hands.
They hold possession of all the great lines of trade and business of all kinds, and they regulate all prices by their own arbitrary methods. This Money Power of the Money Quarter of London is the only grand pre-eminent Imperialism existing on the earth.”
“In 1764, the British East India Company was the grandest and richest corporation in the world. It was the only corporation, which ruled a territorial empire. It was enriched by traffic, by the extension of its trade through the conquest of the trading stations of its Continental rivals and by the wholesale plunder of India….it came to pass that the greater part of the stock of the East India Company, and of the other companies afterwards organized out of the dividends of that great company, fell into the hands of the Jews. The Jews became the great Money Kings of the world…. History presents no career of conquest, in which fraud, deceit and rapine were so blended as in the conquest of India by the East India Company. It was the first example in the history of the world of a trading corporation becoming an imperial power; and its imperial rule was marked by the rapacity, chicane and fraud that characterize a great corporation in the soulless and conscienceless pursuit of gain.”
With the invention of the steam engine in 1775, only the capitalists of the British East India Company had the means to profit from the industrial revolution. They set up hundreds of joint stock companies – manufacturing companies of all kinds, coal and iron mining, railways and ships, real estate – which concealed their ownership.
“In commercial crises, often originated, and always manipulated by them, they managed systematically to break down rival companies, and buy them out, and to rob and plunder the minority stockholders; until, in the end, these organized capitalists got into their own hands and very cheap, all, or the greater part of the stock of the various companies, manufacturing, mercantile and shipping, that originated in steam manufactures. They thus reduced to a system and a science the art of crushing rival companies, and freezing out minority stockholders.”
Woolfolk speculates that the Rothschilds did not act alone but represented a syndicate of Jewish bankers.
“The rise of the house of Rothschild is memorable as the first grand combination of the Jews in a syndicate, for the transaction of a vast business in which all their capital might be combined. The Rothschilds became the head of the Jew Money Kings, and have ever since been the head of the Jews, acting as a syndicate. That house is probably at the head of the Jew Money Power of the world. The wealth of the Money Power is simply beyond calculation. It cannot amount to less than $160,000,000,000. It is probably nearer two hundred billions…. The Money Power has so much money, now, that it can not find investment for it. In one more double it will about have all the property of the earth. In the beginning of its career, a double of its capital meant $100,000,000. Now a double of its capital means $400,000,000,000. And all the property of the world is less that $600,000,000,000.”
According to Woolfolk, the Rockefellers and most great American industrialist-financiers were merely agents of the London Money Power. Standard Oil is a classic example of how it established a monopoly in every enterprize. Owning the railroads needed to transport oil, the Money Power put competitors out of business by undercutting their prices.
This cartel of cartels kept the business class in line by creating the spectre of Communism:
“It is their policy to keep up a hot agitation for Communism and Socialism in the great cities; so that the businessmen, in their antagonism to those ideas, will keep on the side of the Money Power. It is a significant fact that most of the agitators for Socialism are Jews, who are most probably the agents of the Money Power to keep up this agitation for their own purposes… It is a part of the consummate craft of these Money Kings.”
“The Red Dragon” is an important reminder that even 150 years ago, wealth and power were concentrated in a relatively few hands. Modern history reflects the hidden machinations of this Money Power to advance their “world government.” The whole world is being colonized.
We see evidence today that one hand directs all the great multinationals. For example, they all sing from the same songbook of diversity, homosexuality and feminism. All US Presidents are front men for this banking cartel. Their Cabinets are chosen from the ranks of the Rockefeller-controlled CFR. Presidents who defy the Money Power are eliminated. (i.e. most recently JFK and Nixon.) All the Presidential candidates support Israel which was created by the banking cartel to be their world government capital.
This lethal problem arose because the nations of the world were too feckless to do something so simple as create their own currency. They relied on a network of Jewish bankers to create their medium of exchange in the form of debt to themselves. No nation had the power or wit to break away from this worldwide imperialist system which is tightening its grip and inevitably must enslave mankind. Unfortunately, these bankers are not just interested in power or money. They are Satanists who wish to sabotage civilization and rededicate humanity to Lucifer.
We must reject this juggernaut in all its manifestations. Common sense eventually will prevail not because it is common sense, but because continuous violation of common sense produces collapse.
January 27th, 2014
Dear Free Speech Advocates and Radical Press Supporters,
Due to the nature of this particular Legal Update, i.e., it being recent events connected to my Preliminary Inquiry, the necessity arose for editorial commentary throughout the report wherever I felt it was warranted. It also meant that it would be a rather long article as well. The need to present a general overview of my case now that it’s finally reached this stage is the reason for its inordinate length.
January 22nd, 2014 marked the 616th day since my arrest on May 16th, 2012 for the alleged crime of “communicating statements, other than in private conversation, [that] willfully promote hatred against an identifiable group, people of the Jewish religion or ethnic origin, contrary to Section 319(2) of the Criminal Code.” The actual section of the Criminal Code of Canada reads:
Wilful promotion of hatred
(2) Every one who, by communicating statements, other than in private conversation, wilfully promotes hatred against any identifiable group is guilty of
(a) an indictable offence and is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years; or
(b) an offence punishable on summary conviction.
In the Legal Rights section of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, under “Proceedings in criminal and penal matters”, 11(b) it states:
11. Any person charged with an offence has the right
(b) to be tried within a reasonable time;
According to the stated legal rights of all Canadian citizens (as denoted in the above Section 11(b) of the Charter), one must assume that a wait of 616 days or 20 months plus should be construed as being a “reasonable time” in which to expect one’s case to be heard in a Canadian court of law. But of course 616 days is only the beginning of the arduous process of seeking justice within the Canadian court system. January 22nd, 2014 was not the day when my trial on these specious charges was set to commence; it was but the date set for the Preliminary Inquiry which is basically an opportunity afforded the accused wherein they are given an opportunity to dispute the actual evidence which precipitated the laying of charges based on the Crown’s allegations.
I will get to the actual proceedings but first I’d like to say a few words about this section of the Canadian Criminal Code (CCC) which is placed under the heading “Hate Propaganda” and exists as Sections 318(1) through to Section 320.1(1) of the Code itself. This vile, undemocratic section of the Criminal Code was inserted into law by Zionist forces operating within the Cohen Commission back in 1970 and remains the one critical section of Canada’s criminal code where the pro-Zionist elements within Canada – specifically the Jewish lobby organizations such as B’nai Brith Canada (BBC), the Canadian Jewish Congress (CJC), the Simon Wiesenthal Centre (SWC) and the most recently formed Jewish umbrella organization, the Centre for Israel & Jewish Affairs (CIJA) – are now focusing their combined effort in a last ditch, desperate legal campaign designed to censor and silence Canada’s Internet and prevent Freedom of Speech from occurring without fear of legal reprisals.
When the Zionist’s previous weapon of mass deception/censorship, i.e., Section 13(1) of the Canadian Human Rights Act, was repealed by the Parliament of Canada back on June 25th, 2012 there was already a frantic movement afoot to find some new legal avenue with which to threaten and intimidate Canadian citizens into fearing to publish and express on the Internet their opinions or ideas or the opinions and ideas of others on any matter pertaining to this particular element within Canadian society (the Jews comprising less that 2% of Canada’s total population). Having their tentacles firmly entwined throughout the federal judiciary the Jewish lobbyists, led by the likes of former Liberal Attorney General of Canada and staunch Zionist Irwin Cotler, were working overtime behind the scenes in order to formulate new policies within the Harper Conservative government; measures that would ensure that their Number One weapon – HATE – would continue to find a place of honour and litigation within Canada’s legal system and be available to this minority group to use in their ongoing promotion and defence of the Apartheid, Racist, Supremacist State of Israel and the promulgation of its contemptible political ideology known as Zionism.
Until Canada is free of all this Zionist Jew created “HATE” legislation we will never be able to say that we’re a democratic nation that values the one fundamental God-given right that must remain sacrosanct in order to retain all of our other inherent rights, that being the right to free and unfettered expression. All of it must be eliminated so that a level playing field will exist for every Canadian.
The Preliminary Inquiry – Day One
Back in November of 2013 the date, January 22nd, 2014, was set for a full day to hold a preliminary inquiry into my Sec. 319(2) “hate crime” case involving the two complainants – B’nai Brith Canada (represented by Agent Z) and Ricardo Warmouse, a lawyer involved in numerous former Sec. 13 cases prior to the law’s repeal in June of 2012. My former lawyer, Doug Christie, had requested that at least one week of time be set aside for the preliminary inquiry in order to challenge all the specious evidence that Crown had used in order to gain its illegal search warrant then used to invade my residence and steal all my computers and electronic files plus other hard copy materials which weren’t covered in the warrant. Crown at that time agreed to four days.
After the passing of Mr. Christie in March of 2013 Crown Counsel Jennifer Johnston changed that time period to one day, telling the judge that in her estimation a single day was all the time necessary for Crown to – as Crown and Judge Morgan have been wont to say repeatedly, – “pass the Shepherd test” and move the case on to the trial stage. The “Shephard Test“, for those not versed in court legalese involved an extradition case back in the 1970’s out of which emerged a number of test arguments as to the degree of evidence required in order for a judge to determine whether or not to move the case forward.
Being self-represented and unaware of the machinations of Crown I ended up with one day in order to address all the issues including the sworn information of Cst. Normandie Levas provided to a Justice of the Peace in order to have the search warrant approved; information that contained numerous allegations which appeared to have been written by a Zionist script writer rather than by someone who was at the time relatively new to the controversial BC HATE CRIME TEAM and not versed in the whole array of research necessary to make expert commentary on issues dealing with what may or may not be alleged to be “hate” literature. All these allegations initially sworn in the Information regarding postings on the RadicalPress.com website were basically the same evidence that Crown was now introducing at the preliminary inquiry in order to convince Judge Morgan that there was sufficient evidence to commit my case to trial.
Initially Crown was planning to call a number of witnesses for the preliminary inquiry, the bulk of them being RCMP officers involved in the surveillance and later plunder of my home and theft of my computers and electronic files and firearms. The others were Barry Salt an expert in the field of forensic examination of computers and data and, of course, Det.Cst. Terry Wilson, the Lead Investigator for the BC HATE CRIME TEAM located in Surrey, B.C. I had made application to the court to have the judge order Crown to subpoena the other crucial witnesses – the two complainants who had filed the vexatious complaints in the first place and Cst. Normandie Levas, the second member of the BC HATE CRIME TEAM who, as the Affiant swearing the Information, was responsible for the act that led to the granting of the illegal search warrant used to enter my home and steal all of my computer equipment and firearms. Judge Morgan did eventually direct Crown to have Cst. Levas appear but as she was on “holidays” at the time of the scheduled inquiry a later date of March 13th, 2014 was set for cross-examination.
During an earlier focus hearing on January 3rd, 2014 Judge Morgan mediated some concessions between Crown and myself, which I agreed to, regarding some of the witnesses being called in order to prove where I lived and what firearms I had in my possessions and so on; items that would cut down the time which would otherwise have been wasted giving evidence for incidental aspects of the case that I wasn’t intending to challenge. As a concession to this Crown agreed to reconsider the second firearms count involving unsafe storage.At the time, I informed Judge Morgan that I recently had taken the PAL firearms safety course and received 100% of the written test and 90% on the practical test and was now in the process of sending my application off. I also informed Judge Morgan that I was planning to purchase a certified gun storage locker in which to store my firearms properly. Crown then stated that if these preconditions were achieved that they would consider staying the firearms charge.
What was scheduled to be a one day inquiry, like all great plans of mice and men, turned out to be a horse of another colour. I had made arrangements with my two witnesses, Mr. Frank Frost and Mr. Lonnie Landrud, to be at the courthouse at 9:30 a.m. on the morning of Wednesday, January 22nd. When my wife and I arrived around 9:15 a.m. it was evident that my case was not going to be the only one scheduled for the morning. Now this is not an uncommon occurrence in the Quesnel Courthouse (or in many other smaller communities throughout B.C.) and it all stems from government ineptitude (or design?) that there are never enough judges and prosecutors and courtrooms available to handle the volume of cases awaiting address. Nonetheless, I did expect that for a formal preliminary inquiry time would have been arranged so that it could occur without needless interruption.
After approximately twenty minutes of lawyers and Crown attempting to reschedule times, etc. my case began and Crown called their first witness, Det. Cst. Terry Wilson, lead investigator for the BC HATE CRIME TEAM. Det. Wilson informed the court as to his name and position within the RCMP and when Crown asked him about his involvement with RadicalPress.com he told the court that he been monitoring the RadicalPress.com website since April 28th, 2011. It was on that date he first received an email from Ricardo Warmouse who registered a Sec. 319(2) “hate crime” complaint against the site. I thought it was rather amusing given that it was right around the time of the last federal election (May 2nd, 2011) and I had just posted a long article on Harper only the day before on April 27th which I had titled “Hating Harper“. It’s possible that Warmouse didn’t appreciate the graphic header for the piece in question that caused him to lay the charge or it may have been my advice at the time to the Canadian electorate warning them of dire days ahead should Canadians hand Stephen Harper a mandate to govern the nation. Whatever it was, given the current controversy over Harper and his entourage of Zionist sycophant ministers and pro-Israeli band of Chabad Lubavicher controllers traveling at great taxpayer expense to the apartheid state of Israel and soiling Canada’s image as a sovereign nation with their unabashed grovelling and overt support for this criminal state, it was rather apropos that Warmouse would suddenly file a complaint against RadicalPress.com at that particular point in time.
Det. Wilson then went on to describe to the court how his unit has been investigating the website since that time (a period of approximately 32 months thus far) and in the process confirming to the judge that the articles and online books and links, etc. were available to the general public and that anybody could just go there and click on a link and read whatever they wanted without having to enter any passwords or penetrate any firewalls. I thought to myself as he was going on, “My goodness, an acknowledged alternative news site and all you have to do is click on the url to it and the home page or whatever document hyperlink you may have clicked on in the sidebar or the menu bar above just suddenly appears and you can actually view it and read it! What a genius that Arthur Topham must be!”
Det. Wilson also told the court that the website has been running and posting new materials on a regular basis ever since the original conditions of my bail were changed with the exception of a few days in November of 2012 when the site was transferred to a new host server.
It was at this point that Det. Wilson then set up his laptop and introduced the courtroom to a special computer software program that allowed him to show the judge, myself and Crown what appeared to be interactive video footage of my website that they had copied to the program. We all had our own individual monitor screens and sat there while Det. Wilson took us on a virtual journey around the RadicalPress.com home page explaining to the judge and Crown how the site operates. Given the fact that it operates as any normal WordPress program would it was like sitting through an introductory lesson on basic computer skills that one might offer a Grade 2 or 3 class of children. This went on for some time and we all observed with great interest as Det. Wilson clicked on a hyperlink in the Pages section on the side bar and lo and behold the article or book would suddenly appear right there on the screen! All of this was, ostensibly, being done to show that any person in Canada could easily access all the “hate” and “anti-Semitism” and “racism” toward the Jewish population that the Crown alleges is present on the RadicalPress.com website.
Having endured this little media sideshow the judge then called for a break at 10:15 a.m. after which court resumed and other cases once again intruded into the schedule. My inquiry ceased at that point. The lunch hour eventually came and when court reconvened at 1:30 p.m.for the afternoon session more cases consumed the time. It wasn’t until around 3:45 p.m. that the preliminary inquiry resumed. It was at this stage that Crown finally got down to the meat and potatoes of its argument. Det. Wilson was presented with a massive black binder that eventually was entered as Exhibit A in the proceedings. I had been given the same binder a couple of days prior to the inquiry as well and had time to peruse its contents beforehand so it wasn’t a surprise to me. What it contained was hard copy pages of four online books that are present on RadicalPress.com plus two articles of my own that were also on the site. Each was given a tab number and they appeared in the following order:
Tab 1: Germany Must Perish
Tab 2: Israel Must Perish
Tab 3: Protocols of Zion
Tab 4: The Biological [sic]
Tab 5: The Jewish Religion
Tab 6: Karen Selick: Just Another Hate-mongering Germanophobe Jew by Arthur Topham
Crown Counsel Jennifer Johnston then proceeded to ask Det. Wilson questions regarding the 6 items posted on RadicalPress.com.
With respect to Tab 1 which was the online version of Theodore N. Kaufman’s book Germany Must Perish! Wilson went on to describe the book and what it was about. He gave a reasonable outline of its aim and purpose which was to spread anti-German propaganda against the National Socialist government of Germany and the German nation.
When it came to Tab 2 Wilson presented his views in a somewhat modified form than his original statements wherein he was very emphatic about the fact that I had actually written a “real” book bearing the title, Israel Must Perish! Now he was admitting that it was a reproduction of segments of Kaufmann’s book and that I had only changed certain words like “Germany” and “German” and “Hitler” to “Israel” and “Jew” and “Netanyahu” and the rest of the text was actually Kaufman’s. Crown then asked Wilson if he had read the Preface to this “book” which was written my myself. Wilson responded in the affirmative and said that he had read it. At no time though did he broach the issue of my assertion (contained in the Preface) that it was actually a satirical article based on Kaufman’s original hard copy book.
Tab 3 was, of course, the infamous book that the Jews have been attempting to erase from the screen of world history ever since it first appeared back at the turn of the 20th century. The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion has been attacked as an “anti-Semitic” book from day one and as the writer/journalist Douglas Reed, author of the classic study of Zionism, The Controversy of Zion, wrote, more money has been spent on trying to prove this particular book to be a fraud than any other book in history. And for good reason.
Again, Det. Wilson’s assessment of the book was that it was a fraudulent attempt to promote anti-Semitism and hatred of the Jewish population and added that those who promote it see the book as a “roadmap” of the Zionist Jews’ attempt to “take over the world” and create a Jewish one world government. Crown asked Det. Wilson whether the book existed on other websites as well and he confirmed that it could be found on many websites besides RadicalPress.com.
Tab 4 was the online version of a book written by Eustice Mullins called The Biological Jew. Wilson then went on to describe the book as an anti-Semitic book that describes the Jews as “societal parasites”. It was also admitted that this book could also be found on other websites as well as on RadicalPress.com.
Tab 5 referred to the book titled, The Jewish Religion: It’s Influence Today by Elizabeth Dilling. Crown asked Det. Wilson to describe the book and he testified that it was in his estimation “anti-Semitic” and then went on to describe how bad it was and how the author accuses the Jewish rabbis of terrible things like having sex with very young children and so on. Crown then asked Wilson whether or not the author of the book, Elizabeth Dilling, was a “real person”. Wilson’s response was, “I have no idea if the author is a real person”.
Tab 6 was a reference to an article that I had published on RadicalPress.com back on August 13, 2013 entitled, Karen Selick: Just Another Hate-mongering Germanophobe Jew . Finally, I thought to myself, we’re getting to something that I, personally, had penned and I was waiting for Det. Wilson’s assessment of how he felt my writing was such an example of “hate” that it warranted inclusion in the Crown’s arsenal of classic cases of such literature. Det. Wilson then went on to explain to the court that it was a graphic image which I had included in my article that he perceived to be proof that it was yet another anti-Semitic, “hate” piece. I enclose that example directly below for the reader’s consideration.
Following Wilson’s comments regarding Tab 6 Crown then asked him if all of these online books were still up on the website and Wilson replied that all of the books that he found on the website were still there and to his knowledge none had been removed since I was arrested back on May 16th, 2012. It was at this point that Det. Wilson stated, “This is a massive website.”
Crown asked a few other related questions about Det. Wilson’s role in the arrest and he explained that he wasn’t present at my home during the search and seizure of my computers and firearms but that Cst. Gill, the “Exhibit officer” has provided him with my property afterwards. It was then that Det. Wilson sent the computers and firearms for “forensic” analysis so that the RCMP could show the court that I was the actual owner of these stolen devices.
It was at this point that the day’s testimony concluded and we left the courthouse.
The Preliminary Inquiry – Day Two
Day two proved to be much more productive in terms of time and purpose although it got off to a bit of a rough start. One of my witnesses that I had subpoenaed to appear on my behalf, Mr. Frank Frost, had traveled down to Quesnel at his own expense to attend the Preliminary Inquiry. Given that I had been told I would get my full day in court I was not that impressed when I only had approximately an hour and a half thus far allotted for the process.
When we arrived at the courthouse on Thursday, January 23rd, at 9:30 a.m. the court list showed a number of other case listed for the morning. At that point I decided to challenge the court on the matter and when the judge entered the court room and began discussing the scheduling with Crown and other lawyers present I stood up indicating that I had something to say and the judge told me to take a seat momentarily and he would get right to me. I sat down and within a few minutes he called my name and I stood up and said to him, “Your honour, I notice again today the list is getting longer than even yesterday and I’m not getting my day in court. I see this as an attempt by the Crown to prevent my witnesses from testifying. My wife, who is Jewish, is greatly offended by these charges brought against me therefore, in the interest of fundamental justice I ask that the charges be dismissed with prejudice.”
Judge Morgan responded by saying that he was not about to dismiss the case and also stated that there was no design on the part of Crown to prevent my witnesses from testifying. He followed those comments with a short dissertation on the problems and challenges that small communities face where they don’t have enough time and resources to deal with the ongoing case loads and therefore have to juggle and schedule them in order to do the best they can. He assured me that my situation was no different than any of the others. I had made my point and didn’t pursue the issue any further. From then on matters began to unfold as they should and within a very short period of time I was able to begin my cross-examination of Det. Terry Wilson.
Being self-represented since the passing of my former counsel Mr. Doug Christie I was now faced with the task of cross-examining the testimony the arresting officer, Det. Wilson, had given to the court yesterday. I had prepared a series of questions that I planned to ask Wilson plus also a number of other court cases which related to the inquiry process which I intended to use if Crown began to object to any of the questions I had for Det. Wilson. Due to the length of all the questions, many of them not relevant at this point to the update itself, I will focus on only those that I feel are important to a general understanding of the case as a whole. As well, readers should bear in mind that Det. Wilson (and most likely B’nai Brith Canada’s agent Agent Z) monitor the RadicalPress.com website on a daily basis and I don’t wish to divulge certain matters which I intend to use later should the case go to trial.
Cross-examination of Det. Terry Wilson
[Editor’s Note: Please bear in mind that all of the exchanges between myself and Det. Wilson during my cross-examination are taken from my notes which I made at the time I was questioning him and they may not be 100% accurate. Once I obtain a written transcript of the inquiry I’ll know if I erred on any of the minor details but for the most part I’m only quoting the things that I wrote down immediately upon Wilson’s stating them. Readers should also bear in mind that during the questioning I asked Det. Terry Wilson to inform the court as to his level of education and he answered by stating that he had received an Honours Degree in History from the University of Guelph, Ontario.]
I began cross-examination of Det. Terry Wilson by first reading out the following:
“Det. Wilson, I’m going to begin by taking you to the Criminal Code section under which I am charged. Section 319(2) of the Criminal Code reads as follows:
‘(2) Every one who, by communicating statements, other than in private conversation, wilfully promotes hatred against any identifiable group is guilty of … an indictable offence … or an offence punishable by summary conviction.'”
I then asked Wilson the following question: “I believe you stated yesterday in your testimony that the BC HATE CRIME TEAM was formed in 2009 and that it consists of two people, yourself and your partner/assistant Cst. Normandie Levas. Is this correct? Could you please tell the court how many actual convictions your unit has successfully prosecuted under Sec. 319(2) of the CCC since the formation of the BC HATE CRIME TEAM.” Wilson’s reply was that to date his “Hate Crime Team” had not convicted a single solitary soul! He did say though that there were two cases pending, my own plus another investigation that’s still underway.
Given all the media hype about there being so much “hate” on the Internet it begs the question as to just how much this propaganda about hatred that’s being emphasize by Jewish lobby groups like B’nai Brith Canada, the Canadian Jewish Congress, the Simon Wiesenthal Centre and the Centre for Israel & Jewish Affairs is merely Zionist PR designed to justify the spending of vast amounts of taxpayer money in order to create these provincial “HATE CRIME UNITS” across Canada that ultimately only serve the interests of the foreign lobbyists who exploit them in order to monitor, harass, intimidate and punish critics of the Zionist ideology, their global mechanisms and the criminal state of Israel.
Considering Det. Wilson’s concerted effort to show the court that RadicalPress.com was wide open to the general public and that anyone in Canada could easily access the website plus all its accompanying links to a vast assortment of online books and articles, I asked Det. Wilson if he had any evidence that the material on the website was actually viewed and read by anyone. His reply was “Yes”. Then he stated that both of the two complainants, Agent Z and Ricardo Warmouse plus himself had accessed the site. That was the sum total of his evidence. No shit! That was it!
So it was manifestly obvious that no one else in all of Canada had gone on to the RadicalPress.com website, found it to be “anti-“Semitic” and then registered a complaint against it with the BC HATE CRIME TEAM claiming the site was promoting “hatred” contrary to Section 319(2) of the Criminal Code. Yet, because two pro-Zionist agents of the Zionist Jew lobby group B’nai Brith Canada (one of them an ethnic, duel-citizen Zionist Jew and the other a gentile lawyer who made it his business to lay “hate crime” complaints and in many cases profit monetarily from Sec. 13(1) convictions) had filed complaints, that, in the Crown’s view, were reason enough to monitor my website; the RCMP did helicopter and ground surveillance of my home and property; stalked both my wife and myself in the days prior to my arrest; flew the “BC HATE CRIME TEAM” up from Surrey, B.C. (a distance of approximately 600 km) at great expense to the taxpayers of the province; conscripted a number of local police officers as well; stopped me on my way to Prince George on business; arrested me; handcuffed me; terrorized my wife; hauled me off to jail, leaving my wife on the highway in the middle of nowhere; then waited for some justice of the peace on the lower mainland to sign a phoney, illegal search warrant so the police could eventually enter my home, scavenge and steal what they could of my computers and electronic files, and make off with all of my firearms.
Does this sound like the “free and democratic society” called Canada that we see enshrined in the Charter of Rights or Freedoms or is it more in keeping with the Marxist Communist Bolshevik dictatorship under Lenin, Trotsky and Stalin where all it took was a single accusation from an enemy and you suddenly found yourself dragged before a tribunal of crooked, conspiring commissars where all your legal rights suddenly vanished, truth was no defence and you’re then subjected to humiliation and the abject opprobrium of the state and either sent off to spend your remaining years in some northern gulag wasteland or else escorted down into a dark dungeon to receive a bullet in the back of the head?
For those readers who’ve yet to experience such tactics by the state this may all sound a bit fantastic but let me assure you that if it’s happening to me and my family and has happened to other Canadians in the recent past it doesn’t bode well for any of you either as this form of systemic covert repression on the part of the state continues to grow more bold and audacious by the day, aided and abetted by the Jewish lobbyists who now so blatantly advertise their power and influence over Canada’s elected Harper government.
As I thought about the two individuals who’s actions had precipitated all the endless angst of the police and the court against myself and my family I pondered what percentage of the Canadian population this would be when we consider that 2 out of 34.88 million people accessed RadicalPress.com and alleged that the site contained “anti-Semitic” articles and books that wilfully promoted hatred toward people of the Jewish religion or ethnic origin. A quick calculation indicated that it amounted to 0.00000573394495 % of the total population of Canada.
103,000 Missing Emails
Another area of contention was the matter of all of my private email communications contained in the two computers that the police had taken from my residence. I had only recently received a thumb drive from the BC HATE CRIME TEAM containing what is purported to be all of my stolen emails just days before the Preliminary Hearing and to date I’ve not had the time to check to determine how many are stored on the 32 Gigabit memory stick. Crown was supposed to have returned these emails back in 2012 and it was only recently that Judge Morgan finally requested that CC Johnston contact Det. Wilson and ask him to return them. I had indicated to the judge that there was a large volume of relevant data contained in the emails which I needed for my defence and given that email communications are considered to be “private communications” and not admissible as evidence in Section 319(2) offences they should be returned to me.
It has always been my contention that Det. Wilson took my computers in order to access the information contained in the private communications between myself and my many associates and friends. When questioned on this matter Wilson stated that the police have the right to take an accused’s computer in order to search for evidence that would prove in a court of law that the accused was in fact the person posting to the website. When asked whether or not he or anyone else accessed and read the emails or shared them with anyone else Wilson did his best to deny having done so although he did concede that he saw some of them in the course of investigating the various articles and online books that were now being used to convince Judge Morgan there was sufficient evidence to warrant trying the case but that his main object was to verify the material now being presented to the court as Exhibit “A”. I should add that when I later cross-examined Cpl. Barry Salt he confirmed that when he did his initial analysis of my computers that he found 103,000 emails and 5,500 documents. As well, he stated that the number was closer to 107,500 by now. Unfortunately it didn’t cross my mind at the moment to ask him how he would be aware of any increase in numbers but that’s an issue to be investigated later.
There are very good reasons for me to suspect that Det. Wilson did in fact go through the private emails contained on my iMac computer. This came out when I questioned Wilson on the following:
Det. Wilson, I’d like to ask you a few questions about your own history with regard to these kinds of investigations.
Q: I understand that you once worked with the London Police Service. Am I correct in that regard?
[Wilson replied by stating that he had joined the police force in Ontario back in 1989 and the hate crime unit in 1995 and that he had moved out to B.C. in 2003 and eventually joined the BC Hate Crime Team in 2009. A.T.]
I also understand from the decision of the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal in Warmouse v. Kulbashian, 2006 CHRT 11, that while employed by the London Police Service, you executed a search warrant at the residence of James Scott Richardson, an individual suspected of uttering threats.
“ Mr. Wilson obtained a search warrant for the apartment in question, and executed it on September 28, 2001. Mr. Richardson was found in the apartment when the police entered and was arrested. He was charged with uttering threats against property and persons, and counselling the indictable offences of murder and of property damage…
 A police crime analyst specializing in electronic evidence was involved in the search operation. He seized a computer found in the apartment, and once back at the police station, made a mirror image of its hard drive and examined its content. Amongst the directories on the drive was one that contained the logs of Internet relay chats in which the user of the computer had participated…”
Q: Is that correct to the best of your recollection?
[Wilson’s reply was “Yes”. A.T.]
According to that same Canadian Human Rights Tribunal decision, you also executed an arrest warrant for Mr. Alexan Kulbashian, and a search warrant at the residence of Mr. Kulbashian’s parents:
 Mr. Wilson’s investigation eventually led him to conclude that “Totenkopf” and “Alex Krause” were pseudonyms for Mr. Kulbashian, and that he had also been involved in the publication of the September 14, 2001, Vinland Voice articles. Mr. Wilson therefore sought and obtained warrants for the arrest of Mr. Kulbashian (on charges similar to those filed against Mr. Richardson) and for the search of his residence at his parents’ home in North York. The warrants were executed on January 30, 2002…”
Q: Is that correct to the best of your recollection?
[Again Wilson’s reply was “Yes”. A.T.]
And according to that same Canadian Human Rights Tribunal decision, the criminal charges against Mr. Richardson and Mr. Kulbashian were later withdrawn:
“ In the end, the Crown prosecutor apparently decided to withdraw the criminal charges against Mr. Richardson and Mr. Kulbashian before going to trial. According to Mr. Wilson, the Crown concluded that there was no reasonable expectation of conviction on the charges laid against them.”
Q: Is that correct to the best of your recollection?
[Again Wilson’s reply was “Yes”. A.T.]
But despite the withdrawal of criminal charges against Mr. Richardson and Mr. Kulbashian, the evidence that you collected in the course of Criminal Code search warrants was later disclosed to the Canadian Human Rights Commission.
Q: Is that correct to the best of your recollection?
[Wilson’s reply was that the evidence was disclosed to the CHRC but that it was divulged to them only after the commission had subpoena’d Wilson in order to get it. A.T.]
And that same evidence, collected by you in the course of executing Criminal Code search warrants was also disclosed to Ricardo Warmouse, an individual who pursued a complaint against Mr. Richardson and Mr. Kulbashian.
Q: Is that correct to the best of your recollection?
[Wilson replied that the evidence had been disclosed to the commission itself and not specifically to Warmouse. A.T.]
Q: When you disclosed this evidence to the Canadian Human Rights Commission, did you know Mr. Warmouse?
[Wilson’s reply was “Yes”. A.T.]
The Wilson/Warmouse Connection
Having established that Det. Wilson was involved with alleging and arresting and removing other individual’s computers from their homes over a decade ago I continued questioning Wilson as to his relationship with Ricardo Warmouse, the person who had first laid the Sec. 319(2) complaint against me back in 2011.
I asked Det. Wilson the following questions:
Q: When did you first establish contact with Mr. Warmouse?
[Wilson replied that he first connected with Ricardo Warmouse a year or two after he had joined the Ontario hate crime unit back in 1995 and that it was likely due to Warmouse having contacted the unit with a complaint. A.T.]
Q: Did you and Mr. Warmouse ever discuss the Section 13(1) complaint against Mr. Richardson and Mr. Kulbashian?
[Wilson’s reply was “Yes”. A.T.]
Q: When did you first establish contact with Agent Z?
[Wilson replied that he first heard from Agent Z back in April of 2011. A.T.]
Q: Did you initially make contact with Agent Z or did he make contact with you?
[Wilson testified that it was Agent Z who first contacted him. A.T.]
Q: Were you aware, at the time you executed the search of my residence, that I was subject to a proceeding under Section 13(1) of the Canadian Human Rights Act?
[Again Wilson affirmed that he was aware of my previous Sec. 13(1) “hate crime” complaint that Agent Z had filed against me back in 2007 but he attempted to downplay it by suggesting that his investigation focused on doing a whole new investigation separate from what was done (and still remains current) by the Canadian Human Rights Commission. A.T.]
Q: Were you aware that Agent Z was the complainant in the Canadian Human Rights Act proceeding?
[Wilson: “Yes”. A.T.]
Q: Were you aware of any involvement on the part of Ricardo Warmouse in the Canadian Human Rights Act proceeding?
[Here Det. Wilson states, “Yes, Warmouse was also a complainant in the Canadian Human Rights Act proceeding.” Of course, officially, Ricardo Warmouse was not a complainant in the CHRC complaint brought against myself and RadicalPress.com in 2007 although Wilson’s reply now ties in with evidence which I have suggested all along confirms the fact that he was involved but only in a clandestine manner. A.T.]
Q: Did you ever discuss the Canadian Human Rights Act proceeding against me with Mr. Warmouse?
[Wilson: “Yes”. A.T.]
Q: Did you ever discuss the Canadian Human Rights Act proceeding against me with Agent Z?
[Wilson: “Yes”. A.T.]
Q: Did Agent Z ever express to you that he was concerned that the Canadian Human Rights Act proceeding against me might not be successful?
[Wilson’s reply was that during his investigation he had interviewed Agent Z and Agent Z had in fact mentioned his Sec. 13(1) complaint against me but that it was only in reference to Agent Z’s “fear” that this section of the Canadian Human Rights Act was likely going to be repealed. A.T.]
Q: Has the evidence collected as a result of the search of my residence been shared with Ricardo Warmouse?
[Wilson says “No”. A.T.]
Q: Has the evidence collected as a result of the search of my residence been shared with Agent Z?
[Again, Wilson says “No” but he then qualified that by adding it has been “just updated”, whatever that means. A.T.]
Q: Has the evidence collected as a result of the search of my residence been shared with the Canadian Human Rights Commission?
[Wilson says “No”. A.T.]
Q: Has the evidence collected as a result of the search of my residence been shared with anybody? If so, who?
[Here Wilson stated that only those directly authorized to be involved in the investigation have been privy to the evidence collected. A.T.]
Tabs 1 & 2 – Germany Must Perish! and Israel Must Perish!
At this point in my cross-examination I focussed on the first two tabs mentioned in Crown’s Exhibit “A”, those being the online book, Germany Must Perish! written by Theodore N. Kaufmann and my satirical article Israel Must Perish!.
I began my questioning by asking Det. Wilson if he was familiar with the term “satire” and, if so, could he define for the court its meaning. His response was that it more or less meant “poking fun at something”. I then went on:
Q: Did Agent Z ever suggest to you that the article Israel Must Perish! was a form of satire?
[Wilson’s response was that Agent Z hadn’t told him anything that would lead him (Agent Z) to believe it (Israel Must Perish! ) was satire. A.T.]
Q: Have you read the article Israel Must Perish!?
[Wilson: “Yes”. A.T.]
Q: Are you familiar with the book Germany Must Perish!?
[Wilson: “Yes”. A.T.]
Q: Were you, at the time you began investigating my website, familiar with the book Germany Must Perish!?
[Wilson: “Yes”. A.T.]
Q: Throughout the course of these proceedings you and the Crown have consistently referred to the article Israel Must Perish! as a “book”. Could you please explain to the court why you have done so?
[Wilson basically dodged the direct question by saying that it was “sections of a book” meaning sections of Germany Must Perish! A.T.]
Q: Are you familiar with the acronym ISBN regarding book publishing? It stands for International Standard Book Number. Every book published has an ISBN that is unique to that particular publication. Do any of your records show an ISBN number for the purported book Israel Must Perish! ?
[Wilson’s response to the first question was “No” he wasn’t familiar with the acronym “ISBN”. As for the second part of the question Wilson looked again at the images of the article that were in the Exhibit “A” binder and then stated, “I don’t recall one.” A.T.]
Q: Did it ever occur to you that the article Israel Must Perish! might be a satirical reference to the book Germany Must Perish!?
[Wilson’s response to this question was very telling indeed. He simply stated, “No sir.” A.T.]
Q: When you were reading the article Israel Must Perish! on the RadicalPress.com website HYPERLINK http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=1313 did you also read the Preface to it which was posted along with the article?
[Wilson: “Yes”. A.T.]
Q: Are you familiar with the defence contained in Section 319(3)(d) of the Criminal Code, namely that “No person shall be convicted of an offence under subsection (2) … if, in good faith, he intended to point out, for the purpose of removal, matters producing or tending to produce feelings of hatred toward an identifiable group in Canada.”?
[Wilson: “Yes”. A.T.]
Q: Do you accept that certain satirical material might fall within the protection of Section 319(3)(d) of the Criminal Code?
[Wilson: “Yes”. A.T.]
Tab 5: The Jewish Religion: Its Influence Today by Elizabeth Dilling
Q: In your testimony yesterday, regarding Tab 5: of the Exhibit Index File 25166 which dealt with the book The Jewish Religion: Its Influence Today, Crown Counsel Johnston asked you whether or not the author, Elizabeth Dilling, was a “real person.” You responded by saying, “I have no idea if the author is a real person.” Given the fact that you claim to be the lead “hate crime” investigator for the BC HATE CRIME TEAM Mr. Wilson did it not occur to you that you might take the time to investigate and find out whether Elizabeth Dilling was or was not a “real person?” I did a simple Google search of Elizabeth Dilling’s name last night after returning home from court and found a total of 211,000 results in less than 30 seconds listing the various works of the author plus biographical documentation from the Jewish-owned Wikipedia site, the free online encyclopedia, which verifies that Elizabeth Dilling was in fact a real person. Given the fact that in your professional opinion you have determined this book to be “anti-Semitic” and worthy of proof, in your estimation, that it constitutes “hate propaganda” or “anti-Semitic hate literature” could you please tell the court why you would not have taken 30 seconds of your time to check into this matter?
Before I was able to read out the whole question to Det. Wilson he interjected by grinning and saying that after yesterday’s court session he had checked and now was cognizant of the fact that Elizabeth Dilling was an actual author of the aforesaid book. He obviously had been caught off guard by CC Johnston’s question regarding the author. His reply to my question about why he didn’t take the time to check the authenticity of the author was that he was “more concerned with the content of the book than with authenticating whether the author was real or not.”
Q: Are you familiar with the defence contained in Section 319(3)(c) of the Criminal Code, namely that “No person shall be convicted of an offence under subsection (2) … if the statements were relevant to any subject of public interest, the discussion of which was for the public benefit, and if on reasonable grounds he believed them to be true.”?
[Wilson: “Yes”. A.T.]
Question Regarding the Search Warrant
Q: On Page 8 of the BC Hate Crime Team pdf it gives an explanation for Sections 320 and 320.1 Warrants of Seizure. These warrant of seizure sections pertain to the removal of hate propaganda written material. This includes hate propaganda that is stored on computer systems and made available to the public, including through the Internet. A judge who is satisfied by information on oath that there are reasonable grounds for believing that any publication or electronic material—copies of which are kept for sale or distribution in premises or on a computer system within the jurisdiction of the court—is hate propaganda, may issue a warrant authorizing seizure of the copies or order the custodian of the computer system to provide an electronic copy of the material to the court.
Now I was charged under Section 319(2) of the Criminal Code. That section of the criminal code does not allow for warrants of seizure. Could you please tell the court how you were able to gain a search warrant for the removal of all of my computers and electronic files when I wasn’t charged under an offence that permitted such actions?
[Wilson responded by stating “Our search warrant was executed under Section 487 of the Criminal Code of Canada not under Section 319(2).”A.T.]
Q: Do you accept that certain political commentary, even commentary which is extremely critical of an identifiable group of people, may fall within the protection of Section 319(3)(c) of the Criminal Code?
[Wilson replied “Yes”, he did accept that certain political commentary may fall within the protection of Sec. 319(3) of the Criminal Code “but not in the case of RadicalPress.com”.A.T.]
Q: Could you briefly explain your expertise in identifying speech which is prohibited by Section 319(2) of the Criminal Code and not saved by one or more of the defences listed in Section 319(3) of the Criminal Code?
[Wilson replied by stating that he had graduated from Guelph University in Ontario with an Honours Degree in History and that he had been working with “hate crime” units both in Ontario and in B.C. for the past 18 years. A.T.]
Q: Could you define for the court the term “hate”?
[Wilson responded by stating that his “HATE CRIME TEAM” uses the definition of hate that was originally used in the R v Keegstra case. A.T.]
Q: Section 319(2) of the Criminal Code includes an intent requirement. The promoted hatred must be wilful, meaning that the words must be intended to cause hatred. What causes you to believe that this is the case here?
[Without the actual transcripts I can’t state exactly what his reply was other than he started talking about Elizabeth Dillings book, The Jewish Religion: Its Influence Today and her descriptions of what the Talmud states regarding children, Christians and non-Jews, aka “goyim” or cattle, and how this is intended to cause “hatred” toward those of Jewish ethnicity. A.T.]
Q: Do you have any expertise in psychology which would qualify you to accurately assess my intent? [Wilson: “No.” A.T.]
Q: I put it to you that the evidence you have given with regard to the material on my website is not expert evidence. Would you agree?
[Wilson: “Yes.” A.T.]
Q: I put it to you that all of the evidence you have given is, in fact, unqualified opinion evidence. Would you agree?
[Here Wilson launched into the issue and began telling the court of his many years of investigative experience in the field of “hate propaganda” and “hate crimes” but rather than stating that he was an “expert” he preferred to refer to his work as “investigative knowledge”. A.T.]
Q: What makes your opinion on the material on my website more valid than that of myself, the author and publisher of the material in
[Wilson’s reply to this question was that his opinion was “no more valid than anyone else’s.” A.T.]
Hatred on SunNewsNetwork by Ezra Levant
This is just a screen shot. Please click on the url below to view.
Q: On November 11, 2012 I sent a private email to you and Cst. Normandie Levas and Crown Counsel Jennifer Johnston titled, A Personal Appeal. In my letter I spoke about the then recent television interview between my former counsel Douglas Christie and SunTV News Network employee Ezra Levant, host of the show The Source. I explained to you that in the course of the interview, which was approximately six minutes in length, Ezra Levant, who is Jewish and a strong supporter of the state of Israel and the political ideology of that state known as Zionism, stated publicly the following about me:
“I call him an anti-Semite”
“I call Arthur Topham offensive”
“I don’t care much for Arthur Topham. He’s anti-Zionist. I think that’s code for anti-Semitic.”
“We’re showing you some screen shots from his website. I disagree with them. I find them gross. I find some of his comments repulsive.”
“I’m sure that Arthur Topham is motivated by a form of malice.”
“I see hate everywhere in Canada, especially in B.C.” [where I, Arthur Topham just happen to reside. A.T.]
“He’s a nobody”
“I HATE ARTHUR TOPHAM”
“I think he’s an idiot. An anti-Semitic idiot”
“…right wing wackos like Topham”
Is this not inciting and spreading hatred toward myself in a manner far beyond that which the Crown is alleging RadicalPress.com is doing?
[Wilson’s response to this was that Ezra Levant didn’t break any law in stating what he did on national tv because he wasn’t communicating statements that wilfully promoted hatred against an “identifiable group”. In other words he was free to malign and smear and tell the whole world that he “hated Arthur Topham” but that didn’t count because I wasn’t a member of an “identifiable group”. I then said to Det. Wilson, “But I am a Christian and so I am a member of an identifiable religious group.” He had no further comment on that. A.T.]
Following this question to Wilson I then read out my letter to the court. Judge Morgan cautioned me that the letter did state that it was written “without prejudice” and that if I entered it into the record it could be used against me. When I told him that I never received a reply from any of the recipients that it was sent to he said okay, go ahead.
A Personal Appeal
Sunday, November 11th, 2012
Dear Jennifer, Normandie and Terry,
Yes, this is most likely very unusual for all three of you that someone whom you are determined to convict of a “hate crime” and strip of their constitutional rights would have the audacity to write to you directly but given the circumstances under which I am now placed, I would ask that you open your hearts and your minds, if just for a few brief moments, and take approximate 6 minutes of your time (if you haven’t already done so) to view this video of the television interview that my lawyer Doug Christie did with Ezra Levant on the SunTV News Network’s show, The Source, out of Toronto only a few short hours after our (yours Jennifer and mine) appearance in court on Thursday the 8th of November.
Whether or not you are aware of it that television show is broadcast across the nation and the world and the number of viewers who watched it exceed, by far, the number of readers who frequent my (as one of the mainstream media’s writers recently stated), “nasty little blog called Radical Press.”
Within the span of those six short minutes, Ezra Levant, who is Jewish and who also supports Zionism, publicly made the following disparaging statements about me and my website:
“I call him an anti-Semite”
“I call Arthur Topham offensive”
“I don’t care much for Arthur Topham. He’s anti-Zionist. I think that’s code for anti-Semitic”
“We’re showing you some screen shots from his website. I disagree with them. I find them gross. I find some of his comments repulsive.”
“I’m sure that Arthur Topham is motivated by a form of malice.”
“I see hate everywhere in Canada, especially in B.C.” [where Arthur Topham just happens to reside. A.T.]
“He’s a nobody”
“I HATE ARTHUR TOPHAM”
“I think he’s an idiot. An anti-Semitic idiot”
“…right wing wackos like Topham”
If this is the sort of ‘impartial, objective and unbiased’ coverage that I can expect from Canada’s mainstream media throughout the upcoming trial do you find it that strange or unusual or unreasonable that I would want to hold on to my fundamental Charter right to be able to continue operating my website and posting my side of the story in my own defence for those who wish to have an alternative perspective to the one that the msm is now so blatantly broadcasting the minute that an Indictment has come down?
Do you not see the obvious slander, libel and defamation of my person and my motives and my work in these public statements? Do you not see how it already is prejudicing my chances for a fair and just trial? Does it mean nothing to you?
Is this what you, as professionals in the field of law and order and justice, condone and are striving to support in your apparent effort to take away my one means of defending myself from such open and mean spirited vituperation?
All I can say is that, in the stillness and quiet of your own inner mind and soul, you try to see and understand the injustice of what you are doing.
“Digging to the root of the issues since 1998”
Q: Det. Wilson, are you familiar with Section 11(d) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms?
Q: Section 11(d) of the Charter protects the presumption of innocence. I put it to you that this includes the idea that an accused person should not be punished for a crime unless and until he has been proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Would you agree?
[Wilson: “Yes.” A.T.]
Q: Are you familiar with Section 11(e) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms?
Q: Section 11(e) of the Charter provides that no accused person should be denied reasonable bail without just cause. I suggest to you that this means the state should not unreasonably interfere with the liberty of an accused person unless and until he has been proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Would you agree?
[Wilson: “Yes.” A.T.]
Q: As of October 9, 2012, and to this day, there is no bail order preventing me from publishing content to RadicalPress.com pending trial. Is that correct?
[Wilson: “Yes.” A.T.]
Q: And in January 2013, this court specifically determined that it would not be appropriate to impose a bail condition prohibiting me from publishing on RadicalPress.com pending trial. Do you recognize this as a decision of this court?
[Wilson: “Yes.” A.T.]
Q: On November 21, 2012 I received an email from my then web hosting company Netfirms.com which contained an email letter which you had sent to Zach P of the legal department sometime between November 5th when the Indictment was handed down and November 21, 2012. In your letter you informed Zach P that I had been charged with a Section 319(2) Canadian Criminal Code offence, alleging that I had been distributing hateful speech and that you felt that the contents of my website (quote) “may in fact contravene” and be in breach of their policy. Is that correct?
[Wilson: “Yes.” A.T.]
Q: What was your objective in writing to NetFirms.com?
[Wilson then explained that he had written to my web host server “To notify them of a potential breach of their policy.” A.T.]
Q: By alleging that I had been distributing hateful speech and suggesting to Netfirms.com that you felt that the contents of my website “may in fact contravene” and be in breach of their policy were you not in effect asking NetFirms.com to do what this Honourable Court has been unwilling to do, namely shut down RadicalPress.com in advance of my trial?
[Wilson basically repeated what he’d just said about simply notifying them of a “potential breach of their policy.” A.T.]
Q: Do you think you allegations contained in your letter to Netfirms.com were appropriate in view of the presumption of innocence?
Q: Do you think your allegations were appropriate in view of the right to reasonable bail on just terms?
[Again Wilson basically repeated what he’d previously stated. A.T.]
Q: Your allegations, as stated in your email to Netfirms.com, resulted in my web hosting company giving me a 48 hour notice to remove all of the alleged “hateful speech” or else face having my website removed and losing seven years of publishing content. This sudden 48-hour ultimatum was impossible for me to rectify as Netfirms.com had no idea what the alleged offending articles were and as a further result of your allegations they were unwilling to even negotiate with me. I was faced with having to move the site to another host server in an extremely short period of time and in the process of doing so all the content on the website was damaged and hundreds upon hundreds of articles are now in need of editing to restore them to their original condition. Were you at all concerned that your allegations to NetFirms.com might result in the destruction of important evidence?
Testimony of Frank Frost and Lonnie Landrud
The final lap in the Preliminary Inquiry was the calling of two witnesses in my defence. Both Frank Frost and Lonnie Landrud are two of many individuals who have come to realize that the mainstream media no longer serves the general public when it comes to issues of social justice. Both these people have been through the wringer and the stories of the injustices that they’ve witnesses and been subjected to are nothing short of incredible.
The Lonnie Landrud story, should it ever receive the attention that it deserves, will undoubtedly go down in B.C. history as one of the most extraordinary and horrific examples of police corruption and government cover up ever to have occurred in this province. Mr. Landrud had the unfortunate fate in 1999 of witnessing the murder of a young woman by the name of Deena Lynn Braem in Quesnel by two RCMP officers, Cst. Paul Collister and Cst. Bev Hosker. When he called 911 and reported the incident it was the beginning of what is now 15 years of hell on earth for Mr. Landrud. He has had eleven attempts on his life since he first sought justice and at present the police have placed a $100,000 bounty on his head. Mr. Landrud has done everything conceivable to have his case investigated by an independent body and to date has had all of his honest and earnest efforts rebuffed by every level of government from the Prime Ministers office through to the RCMP Complaints Commission and the office of the Premier of British Columbia, Christy Clark. During one attempt on his life by the RCMP Lonnie Landrud, in self-defence, shot his attacker Cst. Paul Collister with a 12-gauge shotgun, severely damaging the police officers left arm to the point where ample DNA evidence was left at the scene of the shooting to verify the fact that the officer had been wounded. The whole incident was covered up and denied by the investigating agencies and to date no one is willing to investigate and verify the evidence that still exists which will prove all of the allegations which Mr. Landrud has been desperately attempting to have examined.
When I finally heard about Mr. Landrud’s story and watched the videos where he had been interviewed back in 2007 I ran his story on RadicalPress.com in order to assist him in getting the truth out about what he had witnessed and suffered since the night he stumbled on the murder scene. Lonnie Landrud’s story is best told in his own words and writings and for this reason I’ve placed the url to his videos below and also the url to (yet another) letter which Mr. Landrud wrote to Prime Minister Stephen Harper, NDP Opposition Leader, Thomas Mulcair, Federal Public Safety Minister Vic Toews, Federal Solicitor General, Rob Nicholson, Christy Clark, Premier of British Columbia and Adrian Dix, NDP Leader of the Opposition Party on April 24th, 2013.
Mr. Landrud testified at the Preliminary Inquiry and told the court about his case and the urgent need for alternative media sites like RadicalPress.com that are willing to carry his story where no none of the mainstream media would do the job.
Click on the url below to view
Mr. Frank Frost also testified before the court regarding the importance of the social media and alternative news networks like RadicalPress.com. Mr. Frost is another individual who has been the victim of RCMP corruption and judicial misfeasance. Again, like Lonnie Landrud, Mr. Frost followed all the customary channels in an effort to expose the murder of a young child in Victoria, B.C. and was met with police and judicial cover-up every which way he turned. Framed and incarcerated for four months in the Prince George Regional Correction Centre where he was refused even a single phone call for FOUR MONTHS, Frank Frost has continued to take a pro-active position with respect to demands that the corruption that he’s exposing within the Ministry of Children and Family Development, the RCMP and the Courts be investigated and rectified. For further information on Mr. Frost’s case please watch his videos located here.
We have not heard the last from either of these two valiant, courageous individuals nor have we heard the last from RadicalPress.com with respect to the pervasive corruption within every level of Canadian government, the mainstream media and all levels of Canada’s judiciary.
This wraps up Legal Update #17 for January 27th, 2014.
An open letter to the clergy of Sts. Anne & Joachim Catholic Church, Fargo, North Dakota by Christine B. Miller
Last Spring my son and I flew to Fargo. It was Lent and my son wanted to attend Sunday mass. Sts. Anne & Joachim Catholic Church was conveniently down the road.
I left the service at the very beginning. Before Vatican II the priest exhorted the faithful: “Sursum cord!” But whenever I tried to lift up my heart I was brought down to this earth by baby crying and the unruliness of the children. While waiting for the mass to end I spent my time in the vestibule of the church browsing through the literature. Among it I found the pamphlet: Pope Benedict XVI composed by Amy Welborn, and published by Our Sunday Visitor. Under the heading: “Who is Pope Benedict?” I read: “Pope Benedict was born on April 16, 1927, on Holy Saturday. In his youth, he was exposed to the horrors of Nazi Germany, which left a lasting impression on him.”
Pope Benedict was not exposed to the horrors of Nazi Germany, but since he was a flak-helper he experienced first hand the horrors of the English and American bombing raids. It was a sunny spring day toward the very end of the war. I was out in the farm yard when a squadron of American bombers flew over Muensterhausen. They flew so low that I could see the crew in the cockpits. They came from the East and were flying West. I assumed the target on which they would drop their load of bombes, air mines and phosphor canisters was Ulm. To this day my heart beats faster when I hear the drones of an airplane. I do not like airports.
Likewise, Pius XII was exposed to horrors in Germany, the horrors of Judeo Communism. In 1919 Pacelli, the later Pope Pius XII was nuncio in Munich, Bavaria. He was on location when the Jews Eisner, Levine, Levien and Axelrod overthrew the legitimate elected government of Bavaria and imposed a soviet regime (Raete Republic). Eugenio Pacelli was in fear of his bodily integrity. He knew that the danger to Christianity did not come from the Nazis, but from Judeo Communism. The Jews never forgave this pope for excommunicating the members of the Communist party, but not the members of the Nazi Party. He was a saintly man, but could not be beatified because of Jewish opposition. In the meanwhile we had John Paul II who completely did Jewish bidding. Benedict XVI was not far behind in his subservience to the Jews. He beatified John Paul II, a profligate spender, and a publicity hog who wanted to be buried in Poland.
Christian churches, but especially the Vatican, seem to suffer from a severe case of schizophrenia. Just one example. The combatants and Jewish supporters of the Spanish “Red” Republic (1936 – 1939) conducted a vicious war against the Catholic Church. Churches were defiled, hundreds of of priest were killed, dead nuns were exhumed and their decayed bodies put on public display. John Paul II bestowed collective beatification on the priests martyred during this civil war. The Nazis with their Condor legion turned the tide in favour of Franco and thereby the survival of the Spanish church. The Red Republic was supported by Soviet Russia which had sent weapons, airplanes and pilots. In return they got Spanish gold. But to this day the Germans are reviled for Guernica. Guernica was already destroyed by Red artillery before the Germans dropped their bombs (asked for by Franco) meant for a bridge in order to cut off the advancement of the Reds to Bilbao. An aside. Picasso’s picture “Guernica” had been painted before anybody had heard of that city.
In Soviet Russia churches were closed, turned into warehouses, or dance halls. In Nazi Germany no church was closed and since it was a period of economic prosperity about 400 new churches were built.
Pforzheim was bombed by the English February 23, 1945. When the warm weather came the city started to stink. The death toll was over 20,000; the majority of the victims were children. But since I do not expect any sympathy from you for “Nazi” children, maybe I can move you with pictures of the gutted churches. The horrors Ratzinger was exposed to were the horrors of Christian countries being ground into the dust by fellow Christians.
Christine B. Miller
Marshfield, WI 54449
Christine B. Miller is the author of Reality Check. She lives in Marshfield, Wisconsin, USA.
She can be reached at email@example.com
Regina v The Radical Press: LEGAL UPDATE #13
Dear Supporters of Free Speech and a free Internet,
Tuesday, May 28th, 2013, saw the return to the Quesnel provincial court house of myself and my dear and lovely wife for yet another appearance on the charge of “willfully promoting hatred against ‘people of the Jewish religion or ethnic group’ as written in Canada’s criminal code sec. 319(2).
At this stage of the proceedings it has become virtually impossible to know what to expect beforehand when attending them. The last time I went on May 16th I was greeted with a completely new strategy by the Crown when they informed the court they had decided to go for a “direct indictment” rather than have the case unfold in a normal manner by allowing me to present evidence at a “preliminary inquiry” in order to determine whether or not the Crown actually had sufficient and viable evidence to warrant proceeding to a trial.
Crown told the court that they were awaiting a decision by the B.C. Attorney General’s office that would confirm this and that they expected it would happen prior to May 28th.
Well, as we all know about the best laid plans of mice and men, that decision by the AG’s office didn’t manifest and so the Crown told Judge Morgan that they would have to postpone that part of the proceedings until a later date at which time they fully expected that the Attorney General’s office would make up its mind one way or another.
Judge Morgan, the Honourable Judge who has been attending to my case from the beginning and who was absent on the previous court appearance, looked over the documents that were awaiting him when he entered the court room in order to get the drift of what had taken place on May 16th. He noted that I had filed an application for particularization of the Crown’s disclosure material and in perusing the document he read out excerpts to the court wherein it was stated that because of the volume of materials (over 1000 pages) presented that it was virtually impossible for me to address what specific posts on my website the Crown deemed to be “hatred”. After doing so he addressed the Crown prosecutor, Jennifer Johnston, and asked her what she had to say about it.
The Crown’s response was rather vociferous and protracted, the main thrust of the argument being that the Crown was not legally bound in any way, shape or form, to divulge to the defendant the specifics of what posts they intended to argue were the ones they felt might prove to a court of law that I was guilty of the said offence. In the words of Crown prosecutor Jennifer Johnston, ” There is no case law anywhere” that says they are bound to do so.
Crown then further worded its argument to the effect that by doing so they would be giving away to the defendant their strategies and in saying that CC Johnston then proceeded to hand to the Judge a number of photocopied pages taken off my website that referred to an online book written by Elizabeth Dilling titled, The Jewish Religion: Its Influence Today. The document that Judge Morgan was presented with first was the Forward to Dilling’s book giving an overview of her various works and her experience in dealing with the negative influences that had come to bear upon America during the course of World War II and afterwards by Zionism.
Judge Morgan quickly scanned the page and then, giving Crown counsel Johnston a rather quizzical look, asked her if this was the sort of thing that Crown was planning to present to the court as evidence?
CC Johnston then launched into a somewhat convoluted and forceful explanation bordering upon become a diatribe. She told the Judge that the article in question was an example of how the defendant’s website was presenting the writer as a credentialed and erudite researcher and writer when it fact (and this was not stated but inferred in her comments) she was really just another anti-Semitic hate monger using the excuse of communism to spread lies about the Jewish Talmud and that the Forward to her book might be compared to a sexual predator who, by sending out an email to someone online telling them about a wholesome family camping trip and inviting them to attend, by stealth and deception lures the innocent (and presumed) youth into meeting with them so they can then violate them sexually!!!
It’s at times such as these that keeping a calm, straight face in the court room becomes extremely challenging.
After her presentation Judge Morgan then stated that he could sympathize with the fact that there was such an abundance of disclosure and that I might well be overwhelmed by it. He said that he was unable to give me any legal advice but that he felt that I should consider bringing this matter up in my Rowbotham application as an illustration of why I felt it was vitally necessary to have counsel to represent me in the event of a trial.
With respect to the Rowbotham application the Judge asked me whether I had filed it and I told him that I had sent off the proper papers to the government but that I was awaiting further word as to whether or not Crown would get their “direct indictment” decision which was to have happened today. Earlier the Crown had informed the Judge of the letter which I had been sent from the legal department for the AG’s office instructing me to either file a Rowbotham application for a counsel to represent me at a preliminary inquiry or to wait and file an application in the event of a trial. I told Judge Morgan that I had gone no further with the application pending today’s appearance because I didn’t know which way the Crown was going with the case. He appeared to have no problem understanding what I was saying.
Judge Morgan then decided that it was not the time make any decisions regarding any of the matters that came up and that he would, once again, have to postpone the case to a later date when Crown felt that they would know for certain whether a direct indictment was happening or not. Crown concurred with him and suggested that they might know better by the end of June or the early part of July, 2013. At that point the Judge instructed me to go to the office next to the court room after adjournment and I would be given the exact date when I was to return.
Following his instructions to me I asked the Judge if I might speak. He gave his permission and I then told him that I wished to register a strong objection to the manner in which Crown was continually making reference to Radical Press and comparing the website to either cases of child pornography or else, as in today’s arguments, cases of sexual abuse. I told the Judge that I felt this was highly unfair and prejudicial and that there was no comparison to what I publish and what the Crown was attempting always equate with those two references. The Judge then said that my objection was registered and following that the case was adjourned to Tuesday, July 9th, 2013 at 1:30 pm.
TEN STEPS TO SUBVERSION
Two Gulags: A second warning to the West
by Arthur Topham
December 11, 2012
“I understand that you love freedom, but in our crowded world you have to pay a tax for freedom.
You cannot love freedom for yourselves alone and quietly agree to a situation where the majority
of humanity, spread over the greater part of the globe, is subjected to violence and oppression.
“The Communist ideology is to destroy your social order. This has been their aim for 125 years and
it has never changed; only the methods have changed a little….And what is ideological war? It is a
concentration of hatred, a continued repetition of the oath to destroy the Western world.”
~Aleksandr I. Solzhenitsyn, from a Speech given in New York City to the AFL-CIO on July 9, 1975
and contained in his book, Warning to the West.
Permit me to begin this essay by stating that in comparing the case of Arthur Topham and RadicalPress.com versus Regina (the ‘Crown’ aka B’nai Brith Canada) to that of the trials and sufferings of former Nobel Peace prize winner Aleksandr I. Solzhenitsyn, I am fully aware that it will naturally be construed by some readers as little more than hyperbole on the part of the writer. Nonetheless there are a number of historic lay lines connecting the two situations which need identification in the hope that others will see and understand the systematic progression and transformation of this climacteric element of tyranny that’s been stalking the global landscape since the successful Bolshevik coup of 1917 in Russia.
First I would like to add to Solzhenitsyn’s words where he states that Communism’s ideology aim has not changed from the start, only the “methods” have. This simple statement, for those of my generation and later generations, is indispensable when attempting to comprehend how the ideology itself has managed to retain its essential character even after the downfall in 1989 of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR).
Key to visualizing the doctrinal strands of the Communist ideology and their continual ability to unobtrusively weave themselves in and out of the ever-changing warp and woof of day to day history is the possession of a fundamental awareness that today’s political ideology, Zionism, is precisely the same ideology that first gave birth to its historic pedigree – Marxism in the mid-19th Century its founding and funding has, from day one, flowed from the same source.
Today, those who have been paying attention to the details in the Zionist script for the creation of a one world totalitarian dictatorship understand that there is a direct connection between the House of Rothschild, the political ideology known Zionism and the premeditated, deliberate, illegal creation of the state of Israel by the United Nations back in 1948. These ideas thrash about like a load of dirty underwear in an automatic washer on most alternative blogs dealing with political issues as well as in a myriad number of posts on Facebook and other internet forums and venues. So many viewers have peered through that revolving window that now (as compared to even a decade ago when the Internet was in its nascent beginnings) the Rothschild = Zionism = Israel connection is a done deal and recognized as fact. But what is not fully understood yet by this vast number of viewers is the underlying, direct relationship between Communism and Zionism, without which the world will continue to disconnect the two apparently differing ideologies and fail to grasp the crucial historic continuity of this longstanding conspiracy; one meant to destroy the West and bring to fruition the ultimate goal of the Communist creed – world slavery under an all powerful Rothschild oligarchy.
The genius that was Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn knew his enemy well enough that he was able, upon finally having his eleven year sentence in the Soviet gulag annulled in April of 1956, to actually have his first novel, One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich, published in Krushchev’s soviet union in 1962. His earlier works that included The First Circle and Cancer Ward were first published in English in 1968 and by 1970 had earned him the Nobel Prize for literature. It wasn’t until 1974 though that Solzhenitsyn was finally arrested again and expelled from the Soviet Union after a copy of his Gulag was seized by the KGB in December of 1973. He first moved to West Germany and then to Vermont in the USA where he remained until returning permanently to Russia in 1994.
Solzhenitsyn’s classic work The Gulag Archipelago was first published in English and French in June of 1974 and remains the literary lynchpin holding together the ultimate hidden knowledge regarding the cogent connection between Marxism, the supposed “Russian” Revolution, Communism, Bolshevism and Zionism and their direct tie to the Rothschild oligarchy alluded to earlier.
Solzhenitsyn was able to accomplish this monumental feat of delivering to the West the evidence merely by omission. His trilogy of terror (the Gulag), which outlines the subsequent premeditated, calculated mass genocide of approximately 66 million Russians, mostly of Christian denomination, from the coup of 1917 up until Krushchev was deposed in 1964, will stand forever as the single most important work ever written on the actualizing and unfolding of Zionism’s essential tenets in a real life situation where a vast nation fell under the full control and domination of its ideological proponents.
He was able to have it published and promoted in the West by simply omitting to identify the vast majority of all the key players in his epic drama of demonic destruction as being of Ashkenazi Jewish origins. In this way he avoided the West’s Zionist press that controls all the major publishing houses throughout Europe and North America who, had he pin-pointed the true ethnic identity of the rogues and criminals and sadistic, psychopathic killers who were directly responsible for this mass murder of the Russian people (including all of Tzar Nicholas II’s family and even the family dog!), would have outright shunned him and his work and in all likelihood initiated a smear campaign against him that would have included all the same tactics now being employed by the Zionist controlled media here in Canada to attack my own person and my website RadicalPress.com.
Upon his return to the Russian republic in the mid 1990’s Solzhenitsyn resumed work on another two volume set of books entitled Two Hundred Years Together, the history of the Jews in Russia. The first volume was called Russian Jewish History 1795-1916 and when published created such a stink within Zionist circles that when volume two, The Jews in the Soviet Union came out in Russia the West was then on to him and the book was never published in the English language and still remains censored by the Jewish media to this day, a prime example of the power of the Zionist media to cover up their endless crimes against humanity.
Fortunately the German Revisionist Udo Walendy was able to procure copies and translate the book into German and from there an English translation of segments of the overall work made it to the West and were published by the Barnes Review in their September-October 2008 edition of their magazine. While not a complete version of the text the edition in question covers the issue of the major players in the gulag drama and identifies all those who were of Jewish origin, more than sufficient to firmly establish that the ‘Russian Revolution’ was in truth little more than an incredible take-over of a nation by Zionist forces funded in full measure by the Rothschild banking cartel.
When Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn was travelling around the United States back in 1975 speaking to different groups about his experiences in the Soviet concentrations camps during the late 40’s and early 50’s he kept emphasizing the perennial problem of trying to convey to people the imminent danger that Communism (aka Zionism) posed to the Western democracies. During one such talk he asked, “Is it possible or impossible to transmit the experience of those who have suffered to those who have yet to suffer? Can one part of humanity learn from the bitter experience of another or can it not? Is it possible or impossible to warn someone of danger?” He then capped off his questings by firmly stating, “It can happen. It is possible. As a Russian proverb says: ‘When it happens to you, you’ll know it’s true.’
Speaking for myself as a writer and publisher here in Canada I too can say that when you attempt to expose the true identity of those who continually strive to remain hidden behind the outer show curtain of unfolding political events while at the same time are controlling the actions of politicians and the mainstream media and all levels of the legal system via their influential lobby groups and advisers and sayanim who have infiltrated every stratum of Canada’s cultural, social, legal, economic, governmental and corporate levels, then you will undoubtedly be attacked in their media and accused by their pressure groups such as B’nai Brith Canada of being an “anti-Semite” and a “hate monger” and “racist” and then, based upon said accusations, arrested by their complicit police agents working for the “Crown” (but another name for the representative of the City of London in England owned by the same Rothschild oligarchy that owns everything else of importance in the world today) and thrown into jail and your constitutional rights taken away from you before you even begin to approach a courtroom in order to challenge their illegal, immoral actions.
Such is the current state of affairs in Canada today whether those in denial of this fact and the complacent and lazy and otherwise too busy to notice portions of society are willing to admit this or not.
Solzhenitsyn once remarked that the very essence of Communism/Zionism was quite beyond the scope of human understanding and that for so many average, normal, moral, decent people living in the West it was just too much of a stretch of their imagination to picture the real and dreadful, vile and disgusting actions committed by these ideologically and spiritually crippled people who have plundered and pillaged and raped and destroyed untold millions of souls in their quest to gain total control of the world.
I could go on with quote after quote from Solzhenitsyn warning to those in the West of the subtle dangers that are working ceaselessly everywhere to drag down unsuspecting nations into the mire of atheistic perversions and immoral mental and spiritual torpor and confusion thus making them incapable of realizing that their rights and freedoms are being terminated until it is too late. Ultimately he says it becomes incumbent upon the individual to reject the Zionist ideology in favour of simply being a human being. In his words, “Such a rejection is more than a political act. It is a protest of our souls against those who would have us forget the concepts of good and evil.”
Thirty seven years have now passed since Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn travelled throughout the USA warning the nation of the impending dangers of Communism/Zionism and imploring the people to wake up and take heed of what he was telling them based upon his own first hand experience. Did the American people hear his words and did they understand? Did they do anything to forestall what was then the beginning of the shift from Communism to what we now call Zionism? Judging from all appearances Solzhenitsyn’s words fell on deaf ears or at least ears already stopped up by the din and blare of the Zionist media that had, for decades, already been pumping their minds full of Zionist propaganda.
Today that same danger has grown even more powerful and openly threatening. It was first openly declared by Douglas Reed back in 1956 in his monumental classic The Controversy of Zion and then enunciated with greater emphasis and detail in 1975 by gulag survivor Solzhenitsyn in his equally eloquent 3-volume trilogy The Gulag Archipelago and still the mass of citizenry continue to think and act as if this threat to their very existence doesn’t exist other than in the imaginations and fantasies of “conspiracy theorists” and Internet fringe dwellers.
And so this very question arises once again with respect to my own trials and tribulations. For years now I have been researching and publishing information that corroborates all that these great forerunners like Reed and Solzhenitsyn have revealed to the world about the supreme danger that lies hidden within the Zionist ideology. Five years ago my website came up on the Zionist’s radar screen and they decided to do whatever it would take to demonize me and have my website removed from the Internet. That is why they created the so-called “HATE CRIME” laws which were insinuated over time into Canada’s legal system via their lobbyist influence, their infiltration of the Supreme Court of Canada (four out of nine SCC Justices are now Zionist Jews) and their behind the scenes control of all of Canada’s active political parties and their leaders via non-elected ‘advisers’.
Will my warning to Canada and the rest of the world also go unheeded like those before me who had the foresight and courage to risk their very lives to bring to light this dark and menacing evil that is slowly overshadowing the lives of people around the globe as well as the very planet upon which we all must live? Will Canadians listen and begin to stand up and speak out without fear? Will they lend their support to my struggle to defeat this sec. 319(2) “Hate” law and protest over the manner in which I am being treated as a Canadian citizen? Or will they stand by in silence, apathy and paranoia watching while the Zionist forces within their nation force yet another writer and researcher to take down his website and cease from telling the truth about what is happening to his country?
It is not just Arthur Topham who will be on trial in the days ahead but every Canadian who values their right to freedom of speech.
FREE JIM TOWNSEND – CANADIAN POLITICAL PRISONER
by Arthur Topham
February 27, 2012
“And I won’t be laughing at the lies when I’m gone
And the sands will be shifting from my sight when I’m gone
Can’t add my name to the fight while I’m gone
So I guess I’ll have to do it while I’m here”
~Phil Ochs, When I’m Gone circa 1960’s
Jim Townsend has spent most of his lifetime fighting for peace and freedom, both within Canada and globally. Like many of us from the 60’s Generation he was able to see the future for the simple reason that he spend his time living in the now. And ‘now’, because of his beliefs, in his country and in life itself, and in his knowing that freedom means the God given right and duty to speak one’s truth, he has been pursued and harassed and hunted down like a dog by those forces within our nation who, for vested and criminal reasons, have set out to silence one of Canada’s great and patriotic citizens.
One might, if they wished to find a comparison to Jim’s voice of reason and common sense, find his equal in that great English patriot and hero of the American War of Independence, Thomas Paine. It was Paine’s ideas; the fruit of his discerning and independent spirit, that tipped the balance of both opinion and history itself, during a period of history when the early American colonies, fast waxing in freedom and prosperity thanks to an abundance of natural resources and space, were faced with the prospect of having to make an ultimate decision; one that would decide their fate as a nation.
The British Crown in 1776 was determined to go to war against the newly founded colonies in the new found world where so many Europeans had fled in vast numbers to escape the endless maelstrom of wars, tyranny, taxation, wage slavery and religious persecution that was then order of the day. Men like George Washington and Thomas Jefferson and Benjamin Franklin all were influenced and impressed into action by the rational arguments made by Paine; arguments as old as dawn’s history and as cold and tangible as the chains that bind every free born human forced to bow down before another’s will.
The fact that today Jim Townsend is in jail in Kamloops, British Columbia, attests not only to what Thomas Paine warned the American people of but also speaks volumes in terms of just how much (or little) humanity has actually progressed over the past 236 years of living in what purports to be a “democratic” country.
Jim, like myself, and many other seekers after truth and justice of the 60s generation, has gone through the mentally challenging incremental stages of growth and learning that are a prerequisite to the actual gaining of a broad, encompassing knowledge of how the world of politics and religion actually works. He began his journey to awareness, not by gazing out idealistically from the hallowed halls of academia and studying college text books in comfort but by entering the real world of common man; a world where freedom depended upon how much money was in your pocket not how many certificates hung from your office wall.
When it comes to understanding how a person’s country is ran politically and economically and who the players are that tend to shape its destiny such degrees of understanding, no different than the academic credentials that adorn the intellectual classes of today’s world, demand a willful, determined effort; one continuously accosted by the conditioned customs of the day.
Jim met these challenges and as a result accomplished what most people today still yearn for: an all encompassing realization and a lucid comprehension of how our world actually is organized when it comes to the basic mechanisms that permit the wheels of both industry and intellect to revolve in harmonious fashion. It is due to his understanding of these principles as well as his cognizance of how they have been usurped and perverted and the fact that he has used his verbal and technical skills via the Internet to transmit his truth that he and his family have been threatened, accosted, literally shot at and prevented from living their lives in peace and comfort.
Jim’s initial book that reveals what he learned about how Canada has been set up can be read at on RadicalPress.com. The title is FREEDOM! CANADA and can be found in the right column on the home page.
Jim’s story is much too long and way too interesting for me to tell it in a short introductory essay. My purpose in writing these lines is to hopefully convey to Canadians the urgency of Jim and his family’s plight. The police forces, the judicial forces, the msm forces, and assorted government ministries (both provincial and federal) have determined to destroy Jim’s character and his ability to support his family all because of what Jim has learned about how the “system” works and because he had the courage and integrity to risk his personal freedom in order to convey his truth to other Canadians.
The state is doing its damnedest to stop Jim’s ideas from gaining any traction on the Internet and thus they have arrested him and forced him to remove his websites that contain the incriminating evidence of their own malfeasance. What remains though and what I would encourage anyone reading these words to do is go try and watch Jim’s YouTube productions that still remain in cyberspace and are the essence of what his life’s work has taught him. If you Google “Jim Townsend – videos” you will still be able to find numerous short 10 minute presentations that cover a number of core topics dealing with how our country has been shaped and manipulated into the conditions that presently prevail. I will be posting the titles and urls to a number of them below.
I have been associated both with Jim’s his work and his valiant efforts to support his family for over a dozen years now. His situation, not that unlike my own, is symbolic to other Canadians who are also struggling to shed light on our collective plight as a nation and who find themselves up against a common, conditioned wall of prejudice and idiosyncratic ignorance coupled with a form of self-imposed bigotry that is as daunting as it is delusional.
As the line from another of Phil Ochs’ famous songs goes; one that applies to not only Jim Townsend but to all who strive for freedom and justice, “there but for fortune, go you or I.”
Back in November of 2011 I posted on my website the following message and plea for Jim. If you haven’t signed that petition request yet please try to do so.
Jim’s case is urgent. He was supposed to go to court for a trial and instead they just grabbed him and put him in jail. His health has been compromised due to an unfortunate tractor accident that crushed his body a few years ago. His condition has forced upon him and his family a scenario where finding the wherewithal to survive financially has been an ongoing challenge. As such I would ask you, dear reader, to look into your heart and try to imagine yourself in Jim’s situation and from there extrapolate to whether or not you might be able to help him and his family out. If you are able to please consider sending some much needed funds to Jim’s wife using the only means available to them which is a PayPal account.
Alexis Elixirs at firstname.lastname@example.org
JimÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s courage, tenacity, advocacy and imaginative, creative spirit throughout this period is a living testament to the fact that all he has done now exposes the corruption of the police state weÃ¢â‚¬â„¢re all living in.
I will be posting more information on my website regarding Jim’s situation. PLEASE TRY TO FORWARD THIS MESSAGE TO OTHERS. Also, I have the Poster “FREE JIM TOWNSEND” in a higher resolution for anyone who might wish to print copies for distribution. Please contact me via email and I will send you a larger copy.
Anyone wishing further information on Jim or to contact Jim via his wife Judith is asked to write to: Judith Townsend email@example.com
As far as I know these two urls are still operating. Please advise if you find they are not working.
OIL AND GAS MONOPOLY
REAL MONEY SILVER AND GOLD
LEGAL CONTRACTS AND VOTING FRAUD
ENERGIZE YOUR BODY AND MIND
SAME OLD NEW WORLD ORDER
PLACER GOLD CLAIMS BY JIM TOWNSEND
CANADA UNDER ATTACK – MY RESPONSE TO CRA REQUEST FOR VIDEOS
TAX PAYERS VERSUS TAX RECEIVERS
GOD BUSTED FOR GROWING POT (PART 1)
GOD BUSTED FOR GROWING POT (PART 2)
On behalf of Jim and his family and his supporter,
Shine your Light for Love, Peace & Justice for All,
Vancouver’s Communist ‘People’s Voice’ Attacks Radical Press
by Arthur Topham
February 9th, 2012
Long time since your name has come up on my screen. Good to know that you’re still at the helm piloting that old antiquated boat “Communism” into the as yet uncharted waters of 2012.
When I read your little critique of my RadicalPress.com site my initial reaction, prior to checking you site, was that it had been penned by none other than the master deceiver himself Will Offley and you were quoting that other Zionist rag, Canadian Dimensia magazine. You will recall that it too attempted to slur and slander the Radical Press back in 2001. But, lo and behold, it turned out to be you comrade Kimball (or so it would appear).
I must say though that if you are still suffering under the misconception that I and my site are pretending to be “progressive” then you truly need to give your head a shake. Every self-respecting journalist and truth-seeker, at this stage of the game Kimball, knows full well that anything even remotely related to that term, is connected to the commies and by clear association the Zionist Ashkenazim Jews. You know, the ones who orchestrated the downfall of the Russian monarchy and then slaughtered 66 million Christians and other non-commie-zionist human beings.
One thing that I did find a bit astounding when I revisit your site Kimball is this evident delusion that somehow you commies are leading the “resistance” against the Zionist juggernaut (you can call it Communism or Talmudic Jew or whatever name you prefer). It’s as if you’re caught still in some bygone, anachronistic time warp and clinging to an outworn dogma that died along with Commissar Stalin and his Jewish overlords.
Now I also find it just a bit hypocritical on your part calling my publishing company Radical Press “badly misnamed.” Why do you do that Kimball? Do you feel that the commies have a special right to use the word “radical” and no one else is allowed to? Do remember please that its root meaning comes from the Latin “radix” which means, as my longstanding RP signature attests, “digging to the root of the issue.”
That is what I have been doing since June of 1998 Kimball, digging up all the weeds that I can find growing in God’s green pastures and exposing their nefarious, noxious roots to the bright and beautiful sunlight of truth so that those planted by the synagogue of Satan (aka the Rothschild Talmudic Zionist Jew criminal cartel that owns and operates an assorted medley of “Marxist” “Communist” publications and other slithering, serpentine seditious scams) will whither and die and this wonderful and marvelous creation that God has provided for us will continue to wax in wonder and joy and not be dragged down into that collective hell on earth called Communism (or, Zionism as it rightly is).
I must say though that I do love that one line:
“One example in Canada is the badly misnamed “Radical Press” website, which presents a mix of left analyses with a deadly dose of hate propaganda. Under the rubric of “defending free speech,” this site posts the viciously anti-Semitic forgery Protocols of the Elders of Zion, the fascist rantings of Eustance [sic] Mullins, and similar gutter trash. Not surprisingly, the Radical Press gives coverage to the hate campaigns led by Kari Simpson and “Culture Guard”.”
I note in your editorial that you are now calling Kari Simpson of RoadKill Radio a “hatemonger” as well and attempting to pull the old “guilt by association” card out of your sleeve. It’s soooo old hat Kimball. I’m always surprised by the incredible lack of imagination that you Zionist-Communist Jews display when it comes to attacking your perceived enemies.
“Hate” is a big thing with you Jews eh Kimball? It’s like pablum for hungry babies or gruel for the famished. Sorta like what the 7 to 14 million Ukrainians that your commie hero Stalin slaughtered and starved to death during the early 1930s would likely have relished had the Bolsheviks not used every diabolical means to insure that they couldn’t access their own food crops.
It’s truly amazing though to find just how versatile that term “hate” really is. Anyone who exposes evil and moral infamy and wrongdoing is automatically called a “hatemonger.” Anyone who tries to show that subjecting little children to blatant brainwashing by blasphemous bumfuckers within the present Zionist-controlled cultural/educational milieu here in Canada must, to any rational, secular-minded, atheistic sycophant of the Zionist-Communist agenda, automatically be a “hatemonger.” How clever indeed Kimball!
Your mental reasoning is akin to calling a person who is health conscious and environmentally aware and who protests over the use of GMO foods and adulterants in their food supply a “hatemonger” due to the simple fact that those pushing these damned products are the same folks who are bankrolling your rag and if someone complains then they too are tarred with the same “hate” brush. Yes indeed Kimball, you and your ilk definitely have an elastic term here that you can quickly draw, like one of your condoms, over the head of any decent, respectable, law-abiding soul who might try and resist your overall agenda of dragging humanity down to the lowest and vilest depths of depravity possible in order to kill the spirit of the individual and turn us all into mindless, sexless, heartless wage-slaves of the Zionist Jew cartel whose storm winds are now blowing your battered little ship of Marxist-Leninist fools toward the rocky reefs of “world revolution” as foretold by your Trotskyite forebears.
It appears, in your mind at least, Kimball, that Ron Paul also ought to be considered an opponent of the Zionist-Communist agenda for a one world totalitarian slave state because he too appears to suffer from “homophobia” and doesn’t want the bumfuckers and commies controlling and running the world. If that be so I must say that I am honored to be included in with the likes of Mr. Paul and his countless supporters.
Your final pithy closing comment again employs that expansive word “hatred.” Neat eh how a simple word like that can nullify any further need to explain your own devious plans for the world and just dismiss with your slight of hand the true freedom fighters who are on to your dark and evil project for global subjugation and an endless hell on earth. True, the Zionists have displayed “patient efforts” over the past century and longer while awaiting their Protocols poison to take effect upon the unwary minds of the proles or masses but thank God that He sent His children a fiery sword to deal with those who now endanger all life itself. The internet will be your demise Kimball. You will be exposed and your sad, false troglodyte prophets driven out from the fields of the Lord back into the existential and nihilistic wastelands from whence you first slithered forth.
Kimball, your pro-Zionist one world government rag asks the following question, “What’s Left?” Well, it’s pretty clear that what’s left is all that is right and decent and ethical and morally poignant in this dear old world; one that’s been under continuous, relentless attack since your Rothschild Jewish commie destruction of the Russian monarchy in 1917. Communism, as the world is now realizing, is but another Zionist euphemism for the powerful, vested and diabolic entity that hides in the shadows and strikes out at the innocent and unsuspecting like a viper in the grass. Jesus Christ referred to your dark power as the “synagogue of Satan.” You and the likes of you are but the Devil’s spawn out to wreak endless slaughter, misery and destruction upon any and all who don’t bend over in obeisance to your deceptive and deadly demands.
Your time draweth nigh….
Take it easy Comrade Cariou and remember to…
Shine your Light for Love, Peace & Justice for All,
Monday, December 13th, 2010 |
Posted by J. Bruce Campbell
JB Campbell: Anti-American
The leakers are being called Ã¢â‚¬Å“anti-American.Ã¢â‚¬Â
What decent person, anywhere in the world today, is not anti-American? Is there anyone more dangerous than our typical ignorant, arrogant American Ã¢â‚¬Å“citizen,Ã¢â‚¬Â who very likely couldnÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t find America on a marked map of the world? Well, yes: the American military man, who is the most dangerous son of a bitch on the planet. And I donÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t mean that in a good way.
IÃ¢â‚¬â„¢m anti-American. I really wasnÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t until I returned to Rhodesia in January, Ã¢â‚¬â„¢73 to join up and help in their struggle against Communist terrorists. IÃ¢â‚¬â„¢d been down there in Ã¢â‚¬â„¢71 for discussions with the government on bringing Americans and others wanting to be part of a new country project based on a book by my boss, Michael Oliver, called A New Constitution for a New Country. The plan was to have a minimum of a hundred square miles with no taxes and no draft, replacing the former tax-haven in Freeport, Bahamas. Thousands of productive Americans and others were ready to relocate.
MikeÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s real name was Olitsky and he was a Lithuanian Jew whoÃ¢â‚¬â„¢d fled into Germany to escape StalinÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s Red Army. He wound up in Dachau for four years. He introduced me to Holocaust Revisionism when I ventured to ask him about his experience. He shrugged and said, Ã¢â‚¬Å“It was a factory. We worked during the day and stayed in a dormitory at night.Ã¢â‚¬Â
Ã¢â‚¬Å“But what about the, uh, theÃ¢â‚¬â€”
Ã¢â‚¬Å“You know, the killings.Ã¢â‚¬Â
Ã¢â‚¬Å“I never saw any of that.Ã¢â‚¬Â
Four years in Dachau, never saw any of that. Okay. He did see the US Army Ã¢â‚¬Å“liberateÃ¢â‚¬Â the camp in April, Ã¢â‚¬â„¢45. The SS and Alpine troops recuperating there had negotiated a surrender to the Americans, who entered the camp and started shooting the guys who thought they were surrendering. Then the Americans marched the surviving soldiers (all the prison guards had fled days earlier) up to a wall near the hospital and set up a machine gun. Three hundred forty-six German soldiers on R&R were slaughtered in a few minutes, five hundred twenty in all that morning. George Patton handled the cover-up and protected the war criminals. The army doctor on the scene, Col. Howard Buechner, described it in his book, Dachau: Hour of the Avenger. Of the 32,000 inmates freed, about 1,200 were Jews, including Mike.
The Military Solution
By J. Bruce Campbell
Friday, July 29th, 2011
As a Rhodesian anti-terrorist in the early Ã¢â‚¬Ëœ70s, I figured that the combination of normal African cruelty with Jewish Communism was the ultimate in political sadism. The atrocities I witnessed were shocking and revolting.
It turned out that my education was incomplete. I was not fully aware of what America had done or would do in the decades to come. It took a few years after returning home to see what the future held for us Americans.
The American military has up to the present date not covered itself in glory. Military glory can only be obtained in the defense of the nation from unprovoked military attack by another country. LetÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s disabuse ourselves of smug ideas that Ft. Sumter and Pearl Harbor were unprovoked attacks.
There have been no unprovoked attacks since the War for Independence from England. Starting in 1861 and ever since, the American military has been the aggressor, controlled and exploited by American politicians on behalf of private bankers.
We Americans were born in a country founded on a violent and treacherous land grab from the original inhabitants, who themselves did not deal in real estate sales or mortgage fraud. Virtually every treaty made by the US government was broken by the US Army, which conducted the first modern extermination program, today known as Ã¢â‚¬Å“ethnic cleansing.Ã¢â‚¬Â
The legal system of a country based on African slavery and extermination of its natives can only be an exercise in fraud and hypocrisy.
The behavior of the American military in the 20th Century and now in the 21st has been shockingly savage and sadistic, with scores of millions of dead foreigners who threatened us not in the least. The suffering of the survivors cannot be calculated.
The American wars of the 20th and 21st Centuries were fought and are being fought for Jewish profit and for the artificial Jewish enclave known as Israel. This Jewish enclave appears to exert total power over the American military.
Back in 1979 I spoke with the former Wall Street banker and congressional investigator for the Reece Committee, Norman Dodd. In 1953 Mr. Dodd elicited the statement from Rowan Gaither, then president of the Ford Foundation, that his and the other tax-exempt foundations were committing their subversion to alter life in the US so that this country could be comfortably merged with the Soviet Union.
Mr. DoddÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s impatient first words in 1979 were, Ã¢â‚¬Å“We have over-diagnosed the problem.Ã¢â‚¬Â These soon became this writerÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s sentiments, which led to an attempt to form the basic resistance movement ten years later which I for political purposes called Ã¢â‚¬Å“the militia.Ã¢â‚¬Â All of my contributions to VT have offered solutions rather than mere analysis, thanks to Norman DoddÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s advice.
The militia was a movement with a narrow window of opportunity to attack the Council on Foreign Relations and other Jewish agencies before the movement was infiltrated by FBI, military and police agents who would ultimately slaughter scores of federal employees and their children to stop this armed and potentially powerful phenomenon.
The merger contemplated by the Ford Foundation is obsolete in the literal sense. But the fact is that America has become the Soviet Union, so that an official merger became unnecessary.
The US Army is now the Red Army. The US Army and the Red Army were military partners from 1941 to 1945 and worked closely for another three years to slaughter millions of helpless Germans and Jew-wise Europeans until the lucrative Cold War was started. Suddenly, the partners became Ã¢â‚¬Å“enemies.Ã¢â‚¬Â In a few decades, the Soviet Union had served its purpose and was dissolved. America then became the Communist monster with no counter-balance.
1948 was also the year that PalestineÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s name was changed and that sad country became the poisonous Jewish headquarters for war, treachery, repression and chaos.
Obviously, this writer is anti-military. Anyone who would start a civilian resistance movement is anti-military. But there is only one organization that can remove Israel as the number one threat to life on this planet. That organization is the US military.
Now, Israel has not slaughtered millions of Iraqis or untold numbers of Afghans, Pakistanis and Libyans. Israel did not slaughter millions of Germans after World War II. The American military has done that, due to some mysterious control of it by American and Israeli Jews.
Again, the US military has not covered itself in glory. It is covered by Jewish slime. The US military is a disgrace and has always been a disgrace. It must be purged of its subversive agents of Judaism.
American and Israeli Jews exercise control of the US military via Freemasonry and homosexuality, both of which are rampant in the senior officer class of the Army, Marine Corps, Air Force and Navy, according to the courageous revelations of Kay Griggs, the former wife of Marine Colonel George Griggs. The colonel revealed to his wife that the senior officer class participates in the vilest forms of Ã¢â‚¬Å“male bonding,Ã¢â‚¬Â done for the purposes of mind control and obedience to illegal orders, which include assassination.
Israel, with American Jewish permission, has threatened to unleash its weapons of mass destruction on the capitals of Europe. Reports persist here that Israel has planted nuclear weapons in American cities that will be detonated if Israel is not obeyed.
Other credible reports indicate that Israel was responsible for the Japanese nuclear disaster in retaliation for JapanÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s support of the Palestinians in the UN. Also that Israel attempted to kill GermanyÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s president for the same reason (sabotaged helicopter) and that the Norwegian slaughter of children was for that countryÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s pro-Palestinian position.
This level of threatened and actual mass murder can only be thwarted by the masters of mass murder, the US military, which has been under the Jewish spell since at least 1861. There is only one way that the US military can redeem itself and rescue the world from the fruit of its sadistic behavior on behalf of Judaism. Judaism must be removed as a threat to life on this planet and prevented from ever rising again.
It is time that the US military cleanse itself of Jewish agents, Freemasons and homosexuals, all of whom serve Jewish finance capitalism and the state of Israel. The US militaryÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s routine slaughtering of foreigners who are in the way of Jewish plundering must stop.
The US military must remove all weapons of mass destruction possessed by Israel, as demanded by John F. Kennedy in the months leading up to his assassination.
Humanity will never be safe until artificial Jewish domination is ended.
America must inevitably experience a military coup to rescue itself from Jewish Rule, which has saturated our political, social and legal systems. Jewish Rule is why America is so sick and degenerate and overrun by aliens.
This is not far-fetched, as we can plainly see with the sudden and unexpected fall of the House of Murdoch. This Jewish propaganda machine is self-destructing. The rest of the Hollywood /New York axis must also be dismantled. Jews must not be allowed in any positions of power or influence, ever again.
We can see what has happened in the past once this effort is begun. Jewish retribution comes in the form of mass annihilation. In those days, the true nature of Judaism was not understood. The Ã¢â‚¬Å“newspaper of record,Ã¢â‚¬Â the New York Times, deliberately concealed from its readers the truth of what a bunch of New York Jews did to the Russian, Ukrainian and other peoples, with American help, starting in 1917.
Most Americans did not understand the Jewish declaration of war against Germany in 1933, or what it would lead to. Some did, the members of the America First Committee, but they were silenced by the FDR-contrived attack on Pearl Harbor.
The American military is the key to survival, just as it has been the key to Jewish Rule. Like fire, it is a dangerous servant and an even more dangerous master. And, as with everything else in life, it depends on good men in charge Ã¢â‚¬â€œ always a problem.
There just might be enough good men in the American military who have the guts and the brains to seize control of the murder machine and arrest the traitors who have been propelled to the top by bootlicking, degeneracy and moral cowardice.
You lieutenants and captains and majors who arenÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t on the make can seize control and end the slaughter and torture of innocents. You know damn well that no one in Guantanamo is guilty of anything other than resisting American barbarism. And thatÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s if heÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s not just some cab driver you stupidly bought for three grand.
Think back on the disgrace of Abu Ghraib and reflect on how such a thing could happen. Abu Ghraib, Bagram, Guantanamo, prison ships, renditions, torture, mass murder, depleted uranium munitions that have produced deformed babies of your own, not to mention the horrors in Iraq. You are in total disgrace for your participation in crimes against humanity.
Of course, you were just following orders given by draft-dodging pukes in DC. You still are. Honestly, how could you take orders from a soft piece of chicken-shit such as Dick Cheney? Or an obvious lying spook such as Barack Obama? Are you that delusional? That impotent? Maybe not.
America is dead, and much of the blame comes from the crimes of the US military in the 19th, 20th and 21st Centuries. We can bring it back to life, which will take a while, but it canÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t be done without the revolt of the US military and the overthrow of the war lords, the finance lords and the propaganda lords headquartered in Washington DC, New York and Tel Aviv.