Famous English war painting ‘Merry-go-round’ by Mark Gertler painted after the Somme, 1916

___________________________________________________________________________

AND THERE THE JEWS!
from A PROPHET AT HOME, Chapter 5
by Douglas Reed. 1941

Editor’s Preface: It was my intention to have this chapter from Douglas Reed’s 1941 book, A Prophet At Home typed up and published online for November 11th to coincide with Remembrance Day. It didn’t happen but readers will still benefit from what the author has to say about conditions in Britain in 1939-40 as they relate to those of today in Canada and the USA as well as elsewhere in Europe, etc.

Reed returned to England in 1939 from the Continent after spending a number of years in Berlin, Vienna and Prague working as Chief correspondent for the London Times. In that capacity he was privy to a panoramic view of the political landscape in Germany, Austria and Czechoslovakia leading up to the resumption of the World War in 1939.

This particular chapter from his final book of a three-part series that began in 1938 with Insanity Fair followed in ‘39 by Disgrace Abounding is extremely relevant to our own times and bears close reading. Seventy years have passed yet the information contained in this chapter appears to be in a time-warp as if the conditions which precipitated it somehow were frozen in time. As such it now stands as a striking historical record, clearly illustrating the degree of power and influence which the Zionist Jews of his day wielded over the British parliament and the British press.

Concomitant with this fact and more important in terms of today is the evidence which Reed provides that shows how the Jews of the 1930s were already consummate masters of the immigration game.

It has been a contention of mine for a number of years that the Zionist Jews who control Canada’s PM, House of Parliament and Judiciary are using their illegitimate influence over government to manipulate and control immigration policies; ones which have been having a detrimental effect upon Canadian society for decades and which also dovetail fully with the Zionist agenda of destroying all nation states in the world in order to facilitate the implementation of their Zionist one world government.

Immigration, like the control of the media, banking, pharmaceutical conglomerates, major corporations including oil and gas and water and cultural and educational institutions, is a vital part of the program to destroy the democratic framework upon which sovereign nations are built and the Zionist Jews have been working this tool here in Canada and elsewhere with deftness and surgical precision for many, many decades. This thesis that immigration policies are being exploited for partisan Zionist purposes should become obvious to any reader who takes the time to study what Reed has to say about the invasion of England by the Jews of Eastern Europe, or as the Jewish media of the day was wont to call them, ‘friendly aliens’; an endearing term to describe the hundreds of thousands of Jewish refugees who flooded into Great Britain during the years leading up to the second act of the World War to take advantage of the precarious political conditions then existing in the British Isles.

There is much more though in this chapter that helps to explain some of the current behaviour on the part of today’s extremist Zionist Jews who are going to great lengths to deflect the growing criticism of their doctrine of supremacist discrimination and racism that is now becoming almost rampant on the one venue for free information still not entirely controlled by their excessive and pervasive power – the Internet.

Reed explains how the Jews of his day used their “anti-Semitism” card to full effect whenever anyone challenged the government’s and the media’s blatant discrimination aimed at the English and the Arabs while all the while consistently favouring the ‘friendly alien’.

Given the fact that today, seven decades later, Canadians in the majority still haven’t grasped the fact that their “mainstream” media and their government are absolutely controlled and manipulated to suit this extremist Zionist Jew agenda, Reed’s prophetic warning of 1941 stands forth in even greater relief as a hallmark to be heeded by anyone concerned with knowing the truth about who is really pulling the strings of our Members of Parliament in Ottawa.

The parallels between Reed’s description of the behaviour of the Members of the British Parliament respecting the ‘friendly aliens’ during a period of critical danger to the nation as a whole and that of our own parliament today is as uncanny as it is frightening to contemplate. It begs the question as to whether the term “change” is in fact a reality or merely a ruse to soothe the ignorant citizenry who still are brainwashed by the Zionist Jew tube.

Read Reed and you will discover why censorship and draconian legislation like sec. 13 today are of such paramount importance to the Zionist Jews and why the extremist Zionist Jew must continually re-create this false illusion now being coined as the “new anti-Semitism” by such Zionist Jew zealots as our former federal Liberal Attorney-General Mr. Irwin Cotler and being flogged upon an unsuspecting public by the likes of B’nai Brith Canada and the Canadian Jewish Congress and even committees formed from our Members of Parliament.

Anyone wishing to access what remains of Reed’s works is encouraged to go to http://www.abebooks.com where you will still find a few of his works available. His most highly recommended work of course is the 1956 edition of The Controversy of Zion which readers will find online at RadicalPress.com.
—————-

AND THERE THE JEWS!
from A PROPHET AT HOME, Chapter 5
by Douglas Reed. 1941

DOUGLAS REED

A provoking thought: if Rupert Brooke, whose poetry, as Lord Halifax said in his ‘This is a conflict of youth against youth’ speech, so inspired the generation of 1914, if this Rupert Brooke had not died, with about a million other Britishers, in the 1914-1918 section of the war which has now been resumed, he would have needed to revise the poem he wrote in the Cafe des Westens, in the Kurfurstendamm in Berlin, in 1912. He wrote that poem sitting at the same table with a friend of mine, Rothay Reynolds, who in the years between the two sections of the World War struggled hard to fulfill the difficult task of being Berlin Correspondent of Lord Rothermere’s Daily Mail, and when Rupert Brooke had finished he turned to Rothay Reynolds and said, ‘I have made this cafe famous’, which was true.

I well remember how that song of England wrung an Englishman’s heart, that is, the heart of a very young and fervent Englishman, who took on trust nearly everything he was told about his native country, of which he had seen but little, in the 1914-1918 war. But if Rupert Brooke had lived in 1939, or thereabouts, he would have found himself out of touch with the taste of the times. For his poem, ‘Grantchester,’ begins:

Du lieber Gott!
Here am I, sweating, sick and hot,
And there the shadowed waters fresh
Lean up to embrace the naked flesh.
Temperamentvoll German jews
Drink beer around – and there the dews…

Well, well, well. How times have changed. Rupert Brooke is dead; the war-to-end-war has gone and the war-to-continue-war is simmering nicely; but the relative position of Jews and dews seems to have been reversed, or have we now both? Rupert Brooke, the singer of the generation of 1914, seemed to find the Jews in Berlin a thought unsympathetic and none took it amiss of him that he said so; indeed, the thought of those temperamental beer-drinking Jews in Berlin helped to fortify the faith of the young Englishman of 1914 in ‘the things he was fighting for’. Now we, he thought, have dews, and we are going to keep them.

But if Rupert Brooke had written twenty-five years later he would have known that those two lines must come out, or else he would have had to find a fresh rhyme for dews, for by the time the World War in which he died was resumed no Englishman of his class and kind would have thought of writing anything which would set the critics yelping the dread name ‘anti-Semite’.

             RUPERT BROOKE - BRITISH POET

By the time the World War was resumed, indeed, the general understanding had come to be that the Jews of Berlin were the most valuable citizens of that town and that we were very lucky indeed to have them, because they were so much cleverer than ourselves. By some further process of reasoning which was a little outside my comprehension, the general understanding seemed also to be that we should fight Germany to enable these people, whom we had been fortunate enough to obtain, to return there as soon as possible; this, as far as I could gather, was among ‘the things’ we were about to fight for.

When I returned to England, on the eve of the new war which had become almost inevitable, I brought back with me a particular interest in this question, because for many years, since 1933, I had noticed, with growing misgiving, that, chiefly through the very great influence which the Jews in all countries exercised in the interest of their co-religionists, this relatively small aspect of an enormous problem was being set out of all proportion to the whole, that the entire wood was disappearing behind one tree.

(more…)

Lisbon And The Zionist Nightmare

By Mike James in Germany – 8 November 2009

You make me laugh. You make me cry. You are fighters. You are natural-born rebels. You are my people.

You are, by virtue of your Anglo-Saxon, Celtic, Frankish, Teutonic, Alpine, Old Mediterranean and Scandinavian ancestry, one whole bunch of contentious, argumentative, reactionary, swing-a-fist after one too many beers, sons of proverbial bitches.

You are the scum of the earth. You are an utter disgrace.

You are largely ignorant, dumbed-down, manipulated, deceived, naive, easily duped by The International Tribe and their grotesque quasi-religious fables and their International Money System.

But you are heroes. And I love you.

Upon the burden sufficient to the strength of your shoulders, all things depend.

(more…)

http://www.truthtellers.org/alerts/adlcampaignstotrain.htm
ADL CAMPAIGNS TO TRAIN HATE PROSECUTORS

By Rev. Ted Pike

October 11, 2009

For the past ten years, the Anti-Defamation League has introduced its federal hate crime bill into Congress five times – and lost. ADL claims to have the purest intentions—concern that federal power is needed if a state does not have a hate crimes law or is unwilling or unable to punish a hate crime. ADL insisted passage of a federal hate crimes law would change little: the vast majority of prosecutions of hate crimes will be initiated by states.

But in its exultant press announcement yesterday, ADL reveals the real reason it has never given up its struggle to make its hate bill the law of the land: ADL wants an army of “anti-hate” prosecutors who can go after those ADL considers guilty of bias-motivated crimes. After giving itself credit as chief architect of hate crimes laws on the state and federal level, ADL says:

The end of the legislative path for the hate crimes bill also marks the beginning of the next campaign – training prosecutors and law enforcement officials about the new law. ADL stands ready to help lead that continuing effort.

ADL is clearly beginning a second phase – to train lawyers and law enforcement nationwide on prosecuting hate criminals. In ADL-speak, “haters” are those who oppose homosexuality, allege Jews dominate media, government, finance, or are guilty of “strong” criticism of Israel or its leaders.

ADL is already the primary source for hate crimes education for the US Justice Department, FBI and all local law enforcement. In 1990, through passage of its Hate Crimes Statistics Act, ADL granted itself such empowerment. But ADL wants much more.

Entirely staffed by Jews, ADL is headed by a devoutly religious Orthodox Jew, Abe Foxman (See, ADL’s Foxman: Man of Faith?). Like its sister Jewish attack group, the Southern Poverty Law Center, ADL has a focused religious objective: to revive ancient Jewish persecution of Christians, begun 2,000 years ago and recorded in the New Testament. The true intent of ADL’s federal and 45 state hate laws is to empower the legal, systematic, and ruthless persecution of Talmudic Judaism’s greatest rival, Christianity. To this end, ADL now calls for a national “campaign” to train an army of federal and local hate crimes prosecutors.

Already, ADL and SPLC–through their Missouri Police MIA Directive as well as warnings from ADL sycophant Janet Nepalitano and her Department of Homeland Security–stereotype Christian and conservatives as unstable bigots and potential terrorist threats. ADL’s Office of Global Anti-Semitism in the US State Department says anyone who believes the New Testament claim that Jewish leaders masterminded the crucifixion is a “classic anti-Semite.” (See, U.S. State Department Says New Testament is ‘Anti-Semitic’?)

ADL’s new campaign to train an army of prosecutors to enforce the federal hate crimes law will usher in progressive arrest of Christian “haters.”  These could well be destined to occupy FEMA prison camps in the years ahead. Ultimately, many could be delivered up, as Christ prophesied, to be tried, convicted and imprisoned in the courts and synagogues of Jewry (Matthew 10:17). Their “crimes against the Jewish people” would include criticism of matters Jewish (anti-Semitism) and questioning the accuracy of the sacred 6 million figure of Holocaust victims (Holocaust denial). However, most will likely be indicted under Jewish Noahide laws for heresy – the “idolatry” of affirming the deity of Jesus Christ, the second member of the Trinity. (See, Coming Jewish ‘Utopia’ Ruled by Noahide Laws)

The Book of Revelation prophesies that the garments of the Great Harlot (Israel and international Jewish control) will be soaked with the blood of the martyrs of Jesus (Revelation 17:6). (See, Israel: On the Way to Empire in the Mideast)

Jewish world dominion will fulfill Biblical prophesy but also a number of predictions by modern Jewish leaders:

“The Jews energetically reject the idea of fusion with the other nationalities and cling firmly to their historical hope of world empire…” (Max Mandelstam, World Zionist Congress, July 1898.)

“Jerusalem is not the capitol of Israel and world Jewry: it aspires to become the spiritual center of the world…” (David Ben-Gurion, Jewish Chronicle, London, Dec. 16, 1949)

“In Jerusalem,  the United Nations (a truly United Nations) will build a Shrine of the Prophets to serve the federated union of all continents; this will be the seat of the Supreme Court of Mankind, to settle all controversies among the federated continents, as prophesied by Isaiah…” (David Ben-Burion, Look Magazine, Jan. 16, 1962)

“The Jewish people cannot ever be destroyed, but rather they and their G-d of History will emerge in days to come triumphant over the evils and the foolishness of all other nations. Zion will and must emerge as the mount to which all other peoples turn.” (Rabbi Meir Kahane, Jewish Press, Brooklyn, New York, Nov. 9, 1973.)

Will Christian America silently allow President Obama to sign ADL’s hate bill as early as this week, accelerating arrival of the Zionist New World order? Incredibly, all major Christian and conservative organizations remain oblivious to the tactic of pressuring Obama to keep his promise to veto a wasteful defense authorization bill–one that includes $100 billion funding for extra F-35 jet engines. Only the National Prayer Network proclaims that we can still defeat the hate bill through presidential veto.

ADL now considers passage of the hate bill a virtual reality. It’s not.

The Senate has yet to give final approval, which will probably take place early this week. Pres. Obama still has to sign the defense bill with the hate bill attached. Obama doesn’t like this defense authorization bill. I believe he’s burned that Congress has defied him. It forces him to approve what he has steadfastly vowed he would not approve –thousands of F-35 engines he says squander taxpayers’ money.

It is up to Christian America NOW to exert greater pressure on Obama than is now being applied by ADL. We must demand he stays true to his promise and vetoes the defense bill. If he vetoes it, the hate bill will be dead in this session of Congress. ADL will have to cancel their second “campaign” to create a federally-authorized army of prosecutors against Christians.

Take action NOW! Don’t be distracted by more controversy about healthcare. Pressure Obama to keep his word.

Email these two messages to the President immediately:

Mr. President, I will vote out Democrats at midterms if you sign the freedom-destroying federal hate crimes bill.

Mr. President, I expect you to keep your promise to veto any military authorization bill that wastes $100 billion of taxpayers’ money on unnecessary F-35 jet engines.

Send these two messages in separate emails.  You may cut and paste them in at www.whitehouse.gov/contact .
This week may decide if America still has hope, or will begin descent into impending slavery. The hate bill could be on Obama’s desk by Tuesday.

Your emails should be there first thing Monday morning.

Endnote:

Modern or “rabbinic” Judaism continues unaltered the teaching of the ancient Pharisees who killed Christ. In my 345-page book Israel: Our Duty…Our Dilemma (available at www.truthtellers.org), I thoroughly document that deep within the teachings of the Pharisees, as contained in their Talmud and Kabbalah, is the oft-repeated assertion that Christianity and its belief in “three Gods” is idolatry; if the world were put right, Christians, as heretics and idolaters, should be killed. After the apostle Paul was converted, he realized that a new “age of grace” made obsolete any duty to kill “heretics,” but before that, as Saul of Tarsus, he, in all good conscience as an Orthodox Jew, killed and hailed into prison as many Christians as possible.

For Talmudic Judaism, no new age of grace ended the ancient duty to cleanse the land of idolaters. Instead, Talmudic, kabbalistic literature, (the highest religious and ethical guide to Orthodox Jews) teaches that when the messiah (Antichrist) comes, he and the righteous of Israel will follow the precedent of Joshua and the Hebrews entering Canaan and annihilate all “idol-worshippers” – Christians– from the earth.

If you don’t think Jewish supremacists today are capable of such horror, just remember what Jewish supremacists unleashed in 1917. Conquering Russia, they set in motion the eventual slaughter of more than 100 million Gentiles, many of whom were Christians (See, Jewish Activists Created Communism).

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Let the Anti-Defamation League teach you how they have saddled 45 states with hate laws capable of persecuting Christians, and spearhead attempts to pass the federal hate crimes bill: http://www.adl.org/99hatecrime/intro.asp .

TALK SHOW HOSTS: Interview Rev. Ted Pike on this subject. Call (503) 631-3808.

The freedom-saving outreach of Rev. Ted Pike and the National Prayer Network is solely supported by sale of books, videos and your financial support. All gifts are tax-deductible.

NATIONAL PRAYER NETWORK, P.O. Box 828, Clackamas, OR 97015
www.truthtellers.org

[Editor’s Note: After posting this last night and sending it out to my list I received word from one of my readers that the creator of this petition, Joseph C. Ben-Ami, is connected with B’nai Brith Canada. The following bio is from his website.

Joseph C. Ben-Ami

“Widely regarded as one of Canada’s leading conservative thinkers and strategists, Joseph C. Ben-Ami is the president of the Canadian Centre for Policy Studies. Before joining the Centre, Ben-Ami was Executive Director of the Institute for Canadian Values and, before that, Director of Government Relations and Diplomatic Affairs for the well known Jewish human rights group B’nai Brith. Prior to this he was a policy aid to Stephen Harper, Canada’s current Prime Minister, and Stockwell Day, Harper’s predecessor as party leader. He also served as National Director of Operations on Day’s 2002 leadership campaign. Ben-Ami writes extensively on current affairs and public policy and is a much sought after public speaker and frequent radio and television commentator. A strong and unapologetic defender of conservatism and conservative values, Ben-Ami is known for his clear and independent thinking on issues.”

Bearing this in mind it begs the question as to his motives in creating the petition? Is it designed to furnish B’nai Brith Canada with a list of those who oppose sec. 13 of the CHR Act? Or possibly a poll for the Zionist forces working here in Canada?

Whatever it is I still think it’s a damn good way of determining the efficacy of the Canadian blogging and communication network that exists outside the mainstream Zionist-controlled media.

If people are too scared to sign their name for a petition to save their freedom of speech then they’ve already succumbed to the wishes of BB (that’s Big Brother or B’nai Brith. Take your pick).

Please try to pass this petition to as many folks as you can. Don’t stall on doing so. Your freedom of expression is in mortal danger at this point in Canada’s history.]

——————–

Joseph C. Ben-Ami
Reflections of an unrepentant conservative

October 15, 2009

As you know, freedom of speech is an essential characteristic of a free society. In Canada, however, this freedom has been under attack in recent years under the pretext of protecting and promoting human rights. Laws that prohibit the free expression of opinion undermine the very foundations of a free and tolerant society and are, therefore, illegitimate and must be abolished.

The Canadian Centre for Policy Studies ( http://www.policystudies.ca/ ) has just launched an online petition calling on lawmakers at all levels of government in Canada to examine legislation within their jurisdiction intended to protect and promote human rights, and to remove those provisions that prohibit or otherwise limit the free and sincere expression of opinion, i.e. section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act.

Please take a minute to sign this petition yourself and email it to your friends and family for their signature as well. You can do so now by clicking on the following link or by cutting and pasting the url into your browser. You can also post the link to social networking sites like facebook or in any forum you regularly visit.

Let’s see how many signatures we can gather on this important issue.

http://www.gopetition.com/petitions/defend-freedom-of-speech-in-canada.html

Harry Abrams: Big Mouth Singer or Just a Gaby Haas Wannabe?
By Arthur Topham
October 5, 2009

“There is nothing that the International Jew fears so much as the truth, or any hint of the truth about himself or his plans.”
~Henry Ford Sr.,The International Jew, Vol. I, p. 200. originally published in The Dearborn Independent.

Back in the 70s when the kids were in their early years the grandparents used to buy them the latest plastic Fisher-Price toys. Their parents, being Hippies, weren’t into plastic so whenever they got something brand new from the grand-folks they usually took a shine to it. One toy in particular that I’ll always remember with fondness was a musical one that sang songs. It consisted of a number of variously-colored, bright plastic heads all lined up in a couple of rows like a chorus of singers and when you pushed the right button their mouths would all suddenly open in unison and a particular electronic sound/song would blare forth. I believe it’s brand name was “The Big Mouth Singers.”

Well, after reading some of Harry Abrams’ postings on FreeDominion.com, where he has taken up residency since July 22, 2009, I’m beginning to think that he and B’nai Brith Canada may possibly have been the prototype the creator of this delightful toy had in mind.

(more…)

[Editor’s Note: Elizabeth Dilling, all things considered, was a prophetess in her own time. Her various works, which include her exposure of the Zionist Jewish infiltration of the United States of America and her analysis of Bolshevism, Communism and Zionism as one Beast with numerous names, are a testament to her courage and her foresight in revealing the truth during a period of American history when to speak out was to risk the inevitable attacks by the Jewish establishment. Groups like the American Jewish Congress and B’nai Brith International and their attack-dog the Anti-Defamation League, were always ready and willing to vilify anyone who dared to speak out about their plans to implement their one world government and Elizabeth Dilling was forced to deal with their Talmudic tactics from the moment she picked up the sword of truth.

Each chapter of her book is preceded by the Forward and an Introduction. Readers who go beyond Chapter One will find it convenient to just scroll down the page until the start of the new chapter.]

—————

Foreword

Elizabeth Dilling Stokes was born, raised, and educated in Chicago. After attending the University of Chicago she married, and for many years devoted her life to her children, social activities on the North Shore of Chicago, and being a concert harpist. After hearing of the great “humanitarian experiment” in Soviet Russia, she traveled there in 1931, and was able to go behind the scenes. She was shocked at the forced labor, the squalid living quarters, and deplorable living conditions, and the atmosphere of fear created by the Soviet dictatorship.

She was most shocked by the virulent anti-Christianity of the atheist Communist regime.

Following her return to the United States she lectured and wrote about what she had seen, realizing from the opposition which immediately arose that a substantial Marxist movement was active in the United States.  In 1934 her first book The Red Network was published, an expose of the persons and organizations furthering Red causes in the United States.   In 1936, her second book, The Roosevelt Red Record and Its Background, was published.

Almost immediately after these books were published, she was attacked as “anti-semitic,” although she had actually offered her anti-Communist services to Jewish organizations, and knew nothing of organized Jewish involvement in the Marxist movement.  After researching and studying, however, in 1940 she published her third book The Octopus, which dealt with these subjects.

After World War II commenced, Mrs. Dilling became convinced that, despite President Roosevelt’s protestations that not one American boy would ever again fight on foreign soil, there was a movement afoot to involve the United States, with the result that a substantial part of the world would be communized later.

In 1941, she led a Mother’s March on Washington to oppose the “Lend Lease” bill, proclaimed to help keep us out of war by its sponsors, but proving the last step for our involvement.  The bill passed by only one vote.  A few months later, the United States went to war.

In 1944, Mrs. Dilling’s views involved her in the now infamous mass “sedition” trial.  The case was ultimately dismissed  by a Federal Court as “a travesty on justice.”

She was later remarried to Jeremiah Stokes, a Christian anti-Communist writer, and she continued to write and lecture in behalf of Christianity and Constitutional Americanism, first publishing this book in 1964.
(more…)

Thought Makes You Free In the EU [and Canada]
by Bernhard Schaub

The world is in flux. The financial crisis has shattered our too-blind faith in the regnant economic and political system. The good in this crisis: it makes you think. Many realize that the remedies proposed by government are no remedies at all, but merely measures intended to keep the existing system alive. The idea is spreading that the whole thing in reality is a giant redistribution intended to concentrate money and power into even fewer hands than before. It is high time to end our unquestioning ways with some serious thought.

The present economic system-like all systems-rests on certain axioms, certain underpinnings, that cannot be disturbed without putting the entire edifice into danger of collapse. Such underpinnings are for that reason always sacrosanct.

He who wishes to be accepted, or even merely tolerated in our society does well to acknowledge, or at least not to openly dispute, certain core beliefs: To these belong devotion to the free market, including debt financing and the independence of the banking system, to so-called parliamentary democracy, including the attendant two-party system, devotion to philo-semitism, multiculturalism, homosexuality, and abortion together with the highest praises for the civil rights to which one considers oneself entitled.

It is even permitted to belong to whatever religion or philosophy one might wish to-but subject to the unstated condition that one doesn’t really take it seriously. Otherwise, one acquires very quickly the odor of fundamentalism.

In today’s political and cultural landscape, a fundamentalist is anyone who holds his Catholic, or Evangelical, or Islamic, or national-or whatever feelings of any kind-above those highest of values enumerated above. Therefore, fundamentalists cannot be tolerated under the global New World Order that is the central theme of American politics. It is only a very slight distance that separates the fundamentalist from the charge of  being a terrorist. And it is not necessary here to spell out what sort of treatment awaits terrorists. That has been ordained by 9/11.

The thoughtful European notes with puzzlement that the proscriptions set forth by Political Correctness and monitored by the culture and the law grow more numerous every day. The citizen is condemned to silence by all manner of gag laws and cowed by the looming threat of the EU criminal code because he no longer knows what is punishable, nor why, nor where. Lately, we’re told, nearly 14,000 “rights violations”-whatever those might be-were committed in Germany in 2008, of which fully 700 were violent. Therefore, there remain from these numbers about 13,000 nonviolent “rights violations.” This is notable, especially in light of the incessant reminders by self-righteous German politicians to China and other countries to “uphold civil rights.” Obviously, the sacred rights of freedom of expression, academic freedom, religious or philosophical belief, etc., are valid only so long as they don’t oppose any of the listed Canons of Western Values.

Catch-22

Here is a Catch-22. It is profoundly disingenuous, not to say outright mendacious: an easily seen-through maneuver for the benefit of the ruling elites of the West.

The greatest taboo of Western propriety, however, is of a historical nature. That is, where the matter has to do with Nazism or the so-called Third Reich, contemporary thought abdicates completely. The brain is relieved of its function, and quasi-religious reflexes take over. All powers of discernment cease, any inquiry into the Holy Writ is thought inappropriate, even malign. Here there is only one viewpoint allowed: the Nazis-read, the Germans-are perpetrators, and exclusively that, and the Jews are victims, and innately and eternally, no less. The uproar about Erika Steinbach, Eva Herrmann, Martin Hohmann, and General Günzel serves to illustrate. Whoever doubts these supreme tenets of belief is no longer a discussion partner, but instead a leper and a heretic rolled into one, subjected instantly to inquisitorial judgment, ostracism, and economic destruction. And everyone who has anything to do with such a person must immediately distance himself.

This goes double for questions concerning the Holocaust, the inner circle of this minefield. The never-ending rumble of the media concerning Bishop Richard Williamson has brought this taboo to the fore once again. Mrs. Merkel feels called upon to instruct the Pope; the Pope feels called upon to call Bishop Williamson to account; the attorney general of Regensburg proposes, and the Justice Department considers issuing, an international arrest warrant for the churchman-and why? Because he judges a historical matter differently from the way it is usually and permitted to do. This constitutes heresy. This means nothing else than that a historical event has been removed from the domain of scholarship and with that, of reasoned discussion, and elevated into the domain of religion, and indeed a kind of world religion that in Germany has unbeknownst acquired the standing of a half-official state religion.

Bishop Richard Williamson

As the media campaign against Bishop Williamson rose to a fever pitch, the revisionist and lawyer Horst Mahler was sentenced in Munich to six years imprisonment and at the same time in Potsdam to four more years, because he questioned details of the Holocaust. In 2007, Mahler’s partner, lawyer Sylvia Stolz, was sentenced to 3 1/2 years’ imprisonment and escorted directly to jail from the courtroom. The reason: she defended the German-Canadian publicist Ernst Zündel in court in Mannheim and took the position that the accused was right, or at least that he was exercising his right to a dissenting opinion. Zündel himself got five years. Two years’ investigatory detention under the most dubious circumstances in Canada didn’t count. So Zündel does seven years because he published arguments over his Internet site concerning the historical thesis of the “mass gassing” of Jews.

Lawyer Sylvia Stolz and Revisionist and lawyer Horst Mahler

Shortly after Zündel, the chemist and multi-book author Germar Rudolf, originally a scientist at the Max Planck Institute in Stuttgart, received a sentence of 2 1/2 years because it was possible to arrive at the same conclusions from his neutral, scientific investigations in forensic chemistry as had been arrived at by other routes by earlier researchers.

  Scientist Germar Rudolf

The Frenchman Robert Faurisson, university professor for documentary research and textual analysis at the Sorbonne in Paris has been subjected to multiple fines of astronomic amounts, and has sustained bodily injuries from a beating administered by unidentified assailants.

Robert Faurisson-French Revisionist

One of the best-known revisionist researchers and writers is the Swiss Romanist and Scandinavist Jürgen Graf, sentenced to 15 months’ imprisonment by a Swiss court for questioning the holocaust hypothesis. He was able to avoid this imprisonment only by flight into exile.

Also in exile is the Belgian father of seven Vincent Reynouard. In Austria, court-expert-witness-engineer Wolfgang Fröhlich is in jail for the second time because he does not accept the official version of the holocaust.

Where is Amnesty International?

Where is Amnesty International? Where the European Court of Human Rights? Where the hue and cry of the media? Where the student protests? Where the Church?

All these men and women and many others, such as Ursula Haverbeck, Dr. Udo Walendy, Gerd Honsik, Dr. Max Wahl, Siegfried Verbeke, Gaston Amaudruz, have committed no offense other than to have arrived at conclusions from their research and analysis that diverge from the official account-and that they then addressed pointed questions to those who have promulgated the putative falsehoods around the world.

It is the pride of western science, since the Renaissance, and in particular since the Enlightenment, to allow nothing to be sacrosanct, and to accept nothing short of absolute objectivity. Revisionism-that is, discernment, confirmation, questioning-is a basic principle of science. All else is dogmatism. Science cannot admit of religious, political, or other social exceptions. In the sense of the natural sciences, there is no Christian reality nor Unchristian reality, no moral nor immoral fact. The scientist has the right to err, since no one is in possession of the absolute truth. Natural science has banished the medieval age of superstition with the age of reason.

As applied to research into the Holocaust, this means: it may not be clouded by philo-Semitic nor by anti-Semitic inclinations, any more than it may be by Germanophilic or Germanophobic. Whether one likes the Jews or the Germans, or dislikes them is no factor in research, and may not affect it in any way.

Ms Merkel said in her message to Pope Benedict XVI, “There may be no denial of the Holocaust.” What does this mean, there may not be? Does it mean that “denial” presupposes that someone advances lies while knowing better? This certainly doesn’t apply to the revisionists, who are convinced of their interpretations. Or does it mean that here, after all-trumping all factual inquiry-global political forces are  in play to which both the German head of state as well as the leader of Christianity must bow?

There is commentary that implies something pretty close to these conjectures. As early as May 1979, Professor William Rubinstein of the University of Melbourne, Australia, wrote in the Nation Review, “Were the Holocaust shown to be a hoax, the Number One weapon in Israel’s propaganda armory disappears.”

And after the lecturer and revisonist Günther Deckert was sentenced to years in jail, the  Frankfurter Allgemeine wrote on August 15, 1994, “If Deckert’s account of the Holocaust were correct, the Federal Republic of Germany would be founded upon a lie.” Every presidential address, every “moment of silence,” every history book would have lied. In that he denies the murder of the Jews, he contests the very legitimacy of the German Federal Republic.

The Canadian B’nai B’rith

But it seems that there are even higher matters at stake: the memory of the Holocaust is central to the erection of the new world order. So wrote Ian J. Kagedan, the Director of the Canadian B’nai B’rith in the Toronto Star for November 26, 1991.

These unseemly newspaper announcements enable us to understand why finally the effort to exhume the claimed victims and properly to account for them has not been undertaken; why Ms Merkel has not called an international Holocaust conference in Berlin and subjected the assertions of the revisionists to a public discussion and critique. With that, the sorry matter would once and for all be placed on the table and the “pseudoscientific bumbling” of the Holocaust deniers would be laid bare for all to see-and indeed by scientists, not just journalists. But therein, of course, argument and counter-argument would have to be heard.

Why can’t this be? Is it feared that such a discussion might produce results other than those that are politically desired? Is this why the revisionists languish in jail? Is this why their books are banned? Is the public to be denied the means of evaluating the state of the revisionist arguments?

The reason for this remarkable scientific regression appears to be the same as the reason for the judicial regression in the courtroom. Here also the established practice-which ashamedly is never admitted in public-that there is never inquiry into whether the accused might be right. Evidence is not taken, and if the accused should try to explain his position, he subjects himself to still further charges, and his attorney as well! A judicial monstrosity. The factuality of genocide of millions in gas chambers is simply declared “given,” and the court has merely to decide whether the defendant has contradicted this given - and then to arrive at a sentence. A historical assumption is thereby peremptorily raised to the status of a universally known and proven law of nature - and at the same time, factual confirmation of it is forbidden!

Who’s Afraid of the Big Bad Truth?

Is somebody afraid of the truth here?

The voices are becoming more numerous that advocate breaking the silence over this: in 2007, Professor Karl Albert Schachtschneider, professor of public inquiry at the University of Erlangen, spoke on the Constitution of the European Union. He took a question from the audience, “Do we have freedom of speech here?” He answered: “A country in which free speech is constrained by severe punishments  is not a free country. The immortal Kant said about freedom of speech that one must be free to say anything, whether it is true or untrue. With the Holocaust, anything might be true or not true; I wasn’t there. But another reason I don’t discuss it,  is that it is forbidden. One is not allowed to dispute it, not even scientifically. The prohibition on “agitation” prevents it. This is not a free country.”

If the “new world order” that the Canadian gentleman from B’nai B’rith mentioned might be in some way identical with that financial system that currently has thrown the world into the grips of an unprecedented crisis, it might in any case be appropriate to examine the central historical and philosophical foundations of that new order somewhat more closely.

“Where everyone condemns, one must prove. Where everyone praises, as well.”  Thought makes you free!

=====
The publicist and lecturer Bernhard Schaub (Dornach bei Basel), publisher of this newsletter, is Swiss. He was a teacher of German and history at Waldorf Schools  until he was dismissed in 1993 for publishing a book in which he cited objective research into the Holocaust. He also lost a later position as academic dean of an adult-education school for similar reasons. In 2006 he participated in the Holocaust Conference called in Tehran by President Ahmedinejad.

[Editor’s Note: It’s sometimes hard to believe that this massive fraud perpetrated upon a war-weary world, could carry on for so long yet it has. Why? Well, from my perspective it’s not that difficult to understand. The greatest threat to global peace is the Zionist-controlled global media because it, and it alone, is responsible for creating the grand deception that prevents the truth about Zionism from permeating the minds and hearts of the millions who still believe the lie that 911 was the work of Arab “terrorists.”

Images of what transpired on Sept. 11, 2009, became fixed in the minds of countless numbers of people who witnessed, vicariously, the attack upon the Twin Towers on that fateful day. Those images were designed and tailored by the Zionist Supremacists to convince viewers that what they were witnessing was in fact a reality. The only reality was that the towers and Tower #7 did, in fact, fall. Everything else about the events that precipitated this occurrence falls into the realm of mind-control.

And so NO! as the title states. Let’s not let this one slip away into the memory hole for it stands as the consummate image of EVIL (DEVIL) and what evil can and will do in order for it to triumph over GOOD (GOD)!]

————-
NEVER FORGET.   NEVER. NEVER. NEVER.  THIS CRIME WILL NOT GO UNRESOLVED….. NEVER.

PLEASE CIRCULATE.  AND HELP CHRIS BOLLYN WITH HIS WORK.  HE IS A TRUE PATRIOT.

Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 11:39 PM
Subject: Anniversary time

From Graham Strachan
Australia

Greetings.

Today is the eighth anniversary of 911 and the attacks on the World Trade Centre and Pentagon. If you still believe they were carried out by 19 Arabs with ‘box cutters’ directed by a man hiding in a cave in Afghanistan; or that two 110 story buildings can collapse perfectly symmetrically into their own basements at free-fall speed (10 seconds each) without the help of explosives; if you also believe two other passenger jets can crash and then ‘vapourize’ leaving no identifiable wreckage; if you also believe 19 Arabs could stand down the US air force in the most protected airspace in the world, then you will believe a cow jumped over the moon.

No doubt the corporate media will show the clips of the Twin Towers telescoping into their basements yet again (and again) to rekindle fears of Muslim terrorists. What they won’t show you is the identical collapse of WTC7 at 5.25 in the afternoon (47 stories; 6.7 seconds). Why not? Because WTC7 was not hit by a plane, had only minor fires on a few floors and collapsed in exactly the same way as the towers. The owner (Silverstein) admitted he and the fire brigade ‘pulled it’. Nor will the corporate media tell you that Professor Stephen Jones has clearly identified explosive residues (nano-thermite) in five samples of dust from the collapses. Why won’t the media tell you? Because terrorists with box cutters don’t have nano-thermite; and it takes months to prepare a building for demolition. If WTC7 was pre-wired, why not also the Twin Towers? The media appear to have willingly taken it upon themselves to protect the real perpetrators. It’s called ‘misprision of felony’, a serious crime, and if proper justice is ever restored major media owners and editors will stand trial for it.

The world cannot “put 911 behind it and move on”. All the evidence indicates that 911 was the most audacious false flag terror attack in history. While it remains unresolved and the perpetrators are still at large even more audacious attacks in the future are guaranteed. More than 1 million civilians in Afghanistan, Iraq and now Pakistan have since been slaughtered to ‘avenge the attacks of 911′ by the governments of Australia, Great Britain and America – all of those invasions war crimes under international law. The media’s response to the killing is to dispute the numbers. What else would you expect?

For eight years Christopher Bollyn has been investigating the crime of 911. You can download his book free at his site (below). I urge you send him a donation, even a small one. He is risking his life to do what the criminal corporate media won’t do - get to the truth about 911.

http://www.bollyn.com/home

GS

August 28, 2009

Dear Radical Reader,

It’s been awhile since I’ve posted any articles. My apologies to those who wait with great anticipation for more information on either the Abrams v. Topham complaint or materials on the Zionist Beast.

Apart from having to be away from home for awhile I’ve also been spending a lot of time over at http://www.FreeDominion.com enjoying all the lively discussions taking place since Harry Abrams finally registered on their forum and has been fielding all sorts of questions from FDers related to sec. 13(1).

Of course I am only an observer there as I’ve been banished from the forum for quite some time but even though I cannot speak, thanks to regular FD member fourhorses, who posts my legal documents for FDers to study and comment on, the Abrams v. Topham complaint is getting a lot of free coverage. For that alone I owe the owner, Connie Fournier, a debt of gratitude for allowing such discussion to proceed. Considering that FD considers itself to be the number one website in Canada in terms of support for the Zionist state of Israel and for all things Jewish this is indeed a generous and open-minded position for her to take.

This is the main reason for this post. I wanted to alert readers to the discussions taking place there and also encourage those willing, to possible register and join in the debate. The least that would happen would be to get banished like I did but a reading of the threads should illustrate the fact that they aren’t as narrow-minded as one might think and their humour is also something to be appreciated. Some of the recent cartoons depicting Harry as the Kosher Saviour of Hate Speech legislation are quite funny. Whether Harry eventually retaliates against them is of course another story. But even if you don’t join in, just reading the various threads and studying the positions taken is, in itself, guaranteed to be an eye-opener in terms of gaining a broader perspective on how other Canadians perceive both sec. 13(1) of the Canadian Human Rights Act and the actions of Harry Abrams and B’nai Brith Canada. Most questions are cogent and the issues are wide-ranging.

Here are the current threads where section 13(1) and the CHRC and CHRT are being given a thorough working over:

http://www.freedominion.com.pa/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=121507
Free Dominion - battleground in Abrams v Topham case

http://www.freedominion.com.pa/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=121449&sid=a3aced58daa797751d8702300312bd2e
FD thread: Richard Warman attempting to seize elderly couple’s home

http://www.freedominion.com.pa/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=121889
FD thread:  Ezra bitch-slaps B’nai Brith

http://www.freedominion.com.pa/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=122021&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=0
FD thread:  Harry Abrams, Classical Liberalism vs. Human Rights

http://www.freedominion.com.pa/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=122246
Innuendo: A Harry Proposition

http://www.freedominion.com.pa/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=122393
FD thread: Abrams v Topham - the next novel approach

I would encourage all readers to check out these discussions. Also, please try to pass this message along to your associates.

Shine your Light for Love, Peace & Justice for All,

Arthur Topham
Publisher/Editor
The Radical Press
Canada’s Radical News Network
“Digging to the root of the issues since 1998″
http://www.radicalpress.com
radical@radicalpress.com
——————————-

Arthur Topham is the Publisher and Editor of RadicalPress.com. He is currently involved in a free speech battle with the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada.

He is also in extremely dire need of financial support to sustain this battle with the forces of repression and censorship as he is not able to work during this period of intense litigation with the Canadian Human Rights Commission and the CHR Tribunal. Any donations therefore would be most welcome. Please see the following url on the Home Page (upper right hand corner) http://www.radicalpress.com/?page_id=657 regarding donations. Also there is a “DONATE” button there for Paypal or here at https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=4466120 . Feel free to use any of them if you can help out. Thanks.

Arthur welcomes all feedback to his articles and can be reached at radical@radicalpress.com .

For the Full Monty on the complaint case involving RadicalPress.com and B’nai Brith Canada please see: http://www.radicalpress.com/?page_id=995

[Editor’s Note: The following lengthy piece is my response to the Complainants’ second, amended Statement of Particulars which they submitted to the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal on July 12, 2009. In it they attempt once again to allege all sorts of nonsense about myself and my website in a further attempt to smear me as a hatemonger and an “anti-Semite” and racist and so on.

For those who have been following this Show Trial from the start I would recommend reading this reply to see the sorts of subterfuge that these folks resort to in order to meet the demands of the notorious Section 13 entrapment legislation under which they operate.]

Harry Abrams and The League For Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada

v.

Arthur Topham and RADICALPRESS.com

File Number: T1360/9008

REPLY BY RADICALPRESS.COM TO ABRAMS/B’NAI BRITH CANADA AMENDED STATEMENT OF PARTICULARS OF JULY 12, 2009

August 3, 2009

Nancy Lafontant
Registry Officer
Canadian Human Rights Tribunal
Nancy.Lafontant@chrt-tcdp.gc.ca

Dear Nancy Lafontant,

RE: Harry Abrams and the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada v. Arthur Topham and the RadicalPress.com
File Number: T1360/9008

Please find enclosed my reply to further distortions, misrepresentations and erroneous suppositions contained in the Complainant’s Amended Statement of Particulars of July 12, 2009.

For purposes of explanation please note that I will be going through the Complainant’s Amended Statement of Particulars in the order that it was presented and making comments where deemed applicable.

(more…)

Is Your Government Breeding Bolsheviks?
B’nai Brith’s brazen attempt to hardwire Hatred and Censorship into the Canadian Psyche

By Arthur Topham

August 8, 2009

In his 2006 book, The Synagogue of Satan, the British writer Andrew C. Hitchcock has a lot to say about the house of Rothschild. In fact his book is a revelation of our times; the chronology of a crime syndicate that began in 1760 when Mayer Amschel Bauer took over his father’s money lending business in Frankfurt, Germany and changed his name from Bauer to Rothschild, a German word meaning “Red Shield” and hung the symbolic hexagram that now adorns the Israeli flag above his door.

The last 250 years is basically a record of the Rothschild’s devastating effects upon the people and the planet; one that has now brought our 20th Century civilization to the brink of either global disaster, or, should we awake in time to this imminent end and act accordingly, the final dismantling and dissolution of this infamous house of hell that’s been the root cause of humanity’s discontent for the past two and a half centuries.

Andrew Hitchcock’s book[1] in some respects parallel’s the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion in that it too is a road map like the Protocols only one that can lead us out of the wasteland of the present times rather than further into a gloomy and foreboding Big Brother future such as the Protocols reveal.

While Hitchcock’s first and foremost purpose is to document the accomplished deeds of this Rothschild house of horror as they pertain to global finance, politics and media, his particular expose of the secret masonic society of B’nai Brith, one of the many Rothschild enterprises designed to assist in its agenda for world domination, should be of special interest to Canadians; especially those Canadians who have managed to break free to some degree from the mind-numbing influence of the Rothschild controlled mainstream media and are relatively able to view, somewhat objectively, the ongoing machinations of this organization; one initially set up and funded in order to present to the world a viewpoint fundamentally Talmudic, cabalistic and atheistic in scope, nature and purpose.

In the USA when Americans think of B’nai Brith they automatically think of the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) the now powerful, aggressive arm of B’nai Brith International originally formed in 1913 by the Rothschild Jews in reaction to a Jewish business man who was convicted of raping and murdering one of his young employees and actually put in jail for his crime.* This was considered an outrage by the then nascent Zionists and so they conspired to come up with an organization that would eventually become the Goliath of gutter journalism, spewing forth volumes of vituperative slander and malignant lies upon any individual, group or organization that ever dared to challenge the tendentious tenets of the Rothschild empire.

I believe Noam Chomsky, Professor of Linguistics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, put it rather succinctly when he once described the ADL as “…one of the ugliest, most powerful pressure groups in the U.S…. Its primary commitment is to use any technique, however dishonest and disgraceful, in order to defame and silence and destroy anybody who dares to criticize the Holy State (’Israel’).”

(more…)

JAMES MARSH - ILLUSTRATOR

Dear Radical Reader,

On March 28th of this year (2009) I received a short email from Byron Prior, an associate out in Newfoundland, who I have been in email contact with for a number of years. His case, as explained in the websites listed in his email below, is most likely one of the best examples of the power of the provincial and federal courts, aided and abetted by a complicit media, to shield themselves and their political cohorts from the scrutiny of public investigation. Byron’s case is a classic, albeit a relatively unknown one, that epitomizes the level of corruption which exists within Canada’s politically biased judicial system and how that system becomes criminal itself in its overt and covert methodologies used to shield the perpetrators of sexual abuse. When people of power are accused of wrongdoing and there is good reason for inquiries to be held then those in such positions exploit their influence for their own self-serving benefit and to the detriment of our justice system as a whole.

Byron Prior’s case, like my own fight with B’nai Brith Canada and the Canadian Human Rights Commission, is purposely kept hidden in the twilight and shadows constructed by the Zionist-controlled mainstream media. Our situations are quite different in terms of the underlying reasons for the persecutions we face but the fact that the system itself is abusing us both is beyond question. In my case the “crime” is speaking the truth as I see it about the Rothschild Zionist global conspiracy. In Byron’s case the circumstances are far beyond anything so threatening as the intellectual attack that I am being subjected to by the state and its Zionist manipulators. His story is a macabre horror story compared to my own, the details of which would provide ample subject matter for a full length documentary. The reaction, by Canada’s legal system, to his noble and sincere efforts to gain both recognition and justice are frightening and ominous.

Please take the time to read through the information provided to me by Byron prior to his capture and afterward by his wife Audrey who is doing her best to bring this story out to the public in the hope that her husband will be treated with respect and dignity.

To be witness to this case is to feel the shame and the infamy of living in a nation thus corrupted. It’s but another stone being rolled back from a tomb containing the dry, dusty bones of a legal system as perverted as those who fill the abusive roles within this sorry and tragedy drama.

On July 24, 2009 I received the following email from Byron’s wife Audrey regarding the latest developments in his ongoing case:

“Byron had court again on Monday, July 20, 2008. They had Dr. Semple from Ontario there to testify in the morning and then in the afternoon the lawyers did their final arguments and then the judge gave his final decision. He went with the report from Dr. Craig here in St. John’s saying that Byron was delusional, rather than the report from 5 doctors from Ontario, and had him committed to the Waterford Mental Hospital where he is to have more assessments done by the board. He is to stay in a locked ward at the Waterford while this is being done. It has to be done within 90 days. He can have visitors, immediate family only, on Thursdays and Sundays from 2:00 to 4:30.

For your info,

Audrey
Wife”

What I found the most disconcerting about Audrey Prior’s message was the fact that the following detailed assessment of Byron’s mental health (see below) was dismissed as irrelevant and instead the blatantly suspect and cursory report by Dr. Craig automatically accepted.

Please pass this on to anyone who might be willing to further assist these folks.

Sincerely,

Arthur Topham
Pub/Ed
RadicalPress.com
——————–

On 3/28/09 3:46 PM, “Byron Prior” wrote to RadicalPress.com:

My family was destroyed as young children by Incest, Child Rape and Abuse of every kind in a small town of 2500 people. Supreme Court Judges, Politicians and RCMP are involved and in a position of “Conflict of Interest” and pay a hooker and her mother to keep quiet in this case in Newfoundland. Their names and why are evident on Harriett’s Customer List at this Website: http://maxpages.com/sexualabuse  &  http:www.youtube.com/cdnjusticedelayed

Before our Premier Danny Williams entered Politics, he and his Law Firm represented me, when he was elected his Firm returned my File and wished me Good Luck finding another Lawyer. No-one in Newfoundland will represent me since and the last Lawyer I asked told me, If any lawyer in Newfoundland represents you, it will be the last job they do in this province. Newfoundland.

(more…)

Dear Radical Reader,

Gilad Atzmon’s short article/commentary on the increasing exposure of crimes committed by Jews is a most welcome addition to the growing list of criticism of political Zionism that’s building across the internet with each passing day.

Given the fact that the Zionist Jews have held the global media in their iron-fisted grasp for a century or longer I cannot stress enough the joy of now being able to witness, in all its grandeur and importance, this amazing technological tool known as the world wide web.

Like a spider’s web surrounding the earth with its sensitive, sticky digital filaments – picking up any and all nuances of movement and change – the Internet is proving over and over that it’s anarchic design (allowing for the only pure form of individual expression and uncensored data) is the consummate avenue open to humanity in which information can come through freely for human mind consumption based upon personal choice and free will. As such it’s the Achilles Heel to any and all who are found out committing crimes against either humanity or the Earth Mother and her myriad children.

Being the new electronic Sword of Truth pulled forth in Arthurian style from the Stone of Ignorance and Lies, its obvious purpose, in a world growing more and more debt and war weary and truth deprived, is to slash through the Gordian underbrush of lies and the detritus of deceit created by this Rothschild-induced, satanic syndicate of mind-control and expose to the clear light of day the ongoing machinations by Jews who formerly would have escaped the notice of masses.

Referencing all these recent revelations to my own battle with B’nai Brith Canada and its somewhat sordid record of abuse via the unconstitutional use of Section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act as well as other controversial examples, I find the actions of these stalwart censors for Israel and Zionism to be a growing part of the overall picture of sinister subterfuge that’s plagued humanity for much too long. Along with those specific crimes that Mr. Atzmon pin-points in his pithy piece I would also add some Canadian examples such as the recent arrest of Quebec’s former Regional Director of B’nai Brith Canada, Bill Surkis, a prominent member of Montreal’s Jewish community who was charged with possessing and accessing child pornography.

It’s an established fact amongst those who have researched the subject that the Jews are responsible for the creation of the Pornography Industry. It’s also an admitted fact that the creators of this multi-million dollar “business” are proud that its main purpose is to undermine and destroy Christian morality. Yet, for all that, they still spend millions of dollars to convince average Canadians that their primary reason for existing is to fight against “anti-Semitism” and “discrimination”. All of this is bogus of course; a cover-up. They are in existence under false pretenses. Their modus operandi is not to prevent unjust discrimination against Jews but to prevent honest debate and criticism of the racist Jewish state of Israel and its attendant political ideology known as Zionism.

We must not forget that B’nai Brith International was established by the Rothschild Jews in New York City back in 1843 as a Masonic Lodge. Seventy years later, in 1913, it produced an off-shoot known as the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) whose primary function was to defame and smear anyone who criticized Jewish supremacism with the egregious epithet “anti-Semite.”

As readers will likely be aware by now this same practice of smear is still being used 96 years later on myself and RadicalPress.com as well as others in Canada who have the temerity to challenge the assumed supremacy of the Rothschild Zionist Jews.

And so I thank Gilad Atzmon for highlighting this issue for us. I’m certain that as the months pass we will be seeing more and more examples of such perfidy presenting themselves to the tender touch of the www for all to witness.

Shine your Light for Love, Peace & Justice for All,

Arthur Topham
Publisher/Editor
The Radical Press
Canada’s Radical News Network
“Digging to the root of the issues since 1998″
http://www.radicalpress.com
radical@radicalpress.com

———————

http://palestinethinktank.com/2009/07/24/gilad-atzmon-time-to-talk-about-the-rise-of-jewish-crime/
Time to Talk about the Rise of Jewish Crime?
By Gilad Atzmon
July 24th, 2009

Gilad Atzmon

“I am what you call a matchmaker,” Rosenbaum is quoted as saying at a July 13 meeting with the two undercover agents.

“I’m doing this a long time,” the complaint says Rosenbaum told the two agents. (more…)

It’s Time to Kill Sec. 13

By Arthur Topham
July 23, 2009

It might appear unusual for an old Hippie such as myself to be advocating “killing” things seeing as how I’ve spend the greater portion of my lifetime singing the theme-song of the 60’s: LOVE & PEACE. But, I suppose there comes a time in every person’s life when they are faced with certain decisions which, weighed in their fullness and measured against the alternatives that present themselves, require address. Such is the case with this dreadful and ominous threat to Canada’s collective freedoms of speech and expression now embodied in Section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act.

Over the past couple of years my mind has been immersed in the subject. Having spent decades writing and researching and criticizing the machinations of those who have been conspiring to limit the individual freedoms of people around the world suddenly I was confronted with a new level of reality. Upon receiving word from the Canadian Human Rights Commission that I had been charged with committing the very crime which I’d spent so many years fighting against was, to use yet another expression of the 60s, “mind-blowing” to say the least.

Since then it’s been a steady and steep learning curve for me; one which, thanks to the fact that I can still publish my thoughts and ideas on the net, I have been able to share with people around the world. In that sense it’s been a golden opportunity to share my perspective and the perspectives of others who feel the same way about freedom of speech and the reasons for why we’re now being slammed front and center by the censors; those who obviously believe that silence is golden when it comes to criticism of certain elements of our Establishment who don’t wish to become the focus of any media scrutiny or political analysis.

One thing that has proven true over the past few years, whether the censorship advocates wish to acknowledge it or not, is the fact that increased awareness concerning the root causes of humanity’s overall discontent is growing at an exponential rate thanks to the net. I felt this very strongly when I wrote the little article Killing the 100th Monkey back in January of 2008 outlining the phenomenon. It was happening big time then but in the past year and a half it has increased even further thanks to the actions of those who continually precipitate hatred and violence and terrorism and economic deception upon the defenseless peoples of the world using the guise of various government and international agencies to do so.

For those who, for whatever reasons, haven’t had the time or the inclination to investigate this burgeoning and blossoming of knowledge and information, it remains still a mystery as to why all the assorted confusing, contradictory factors which the mainstream media juggles and dangles before the glazed eyes and minds of the general public are not recognized for what they truly are: deception and subterfuge, not only with an agenda but also with an attitude (big time). This enigma of disparate, deliberate design, which the general populace – who rely upon the mainstream media for their information – is faced with (literally) every day, is being continually countered in the amazing world of the blogosphere or as I prefer to label it, Cyberspace, every minute of the day.

Of course those who don’t wish to see this growing awareness of first causes flourish try their best to denigrate it and label it as merely “anti-Semitic”, “hate-filled”, “racist” propaganda purposely designed to bring opprobrium and contempt upon those to whom all the criticism is being directed. As such they face a formidable challenge. It’s as if all hell had suddenly broke loose for them. It’s Pandora’s Box maxing out on a combination of meth and viagra! It’s the proverbial lesson encompassed in the metaphor of the little Dutch boy trying to hold back the rising flood tide by sticking his finger in the hole of the crumbling dike. In other words it’s revelation time, come hell or high water. The OK Corral in digital format. The Quickening. And for Christians and others of a religious bent it’s the beginning of the End Times. The start of mankind’s Trials and Tribulations as we swiftly ascend either the stairway to Heaven or descend into the valley of Armageddon.

What all of these assorted approaches to today’s political and spiritual events create is a hodge-podge of positions that the censors are faced with having to address whether they wish to or not. And it is creating havoc within their ranks as we see them desperately attempt to address this growing resistance to their censorship methods.

Using what now appear to most serious enquirers as worn-out cliche responses to the mountains of accusations and evidence currently confronting their actions the censors are forced to retreat into their one remaining safety zone – the monolithic government agencies that they surreptitiously created over the past decades to quell the growing, vociferous hordes of rabble who are now realizing they’ve been had big-time by these self-selected arbiters of public policy and basic human rights. High above the ramparts of their Commissions and Tribunals is raised the flag of their dominion and upon it, emblazoned in blood red letters upon a backdrop of the Red Shield, are the words: Section 13(1).

Holding up in their castles of sand and subterfuge and sophistry they’re in disarray and confusion, one hand not fully aware of what the other is doing. Their techniques and strategies are coming apart at the seams as the electronic world upon which they depend betrays their ignoble ends and their illegal, immoral acts. Every turn they make they’re caught doing something they shouldn’t be doing. Every statement they issue is immediately proven to be both transparent and filled with lies and half-truths. They’re beginning to react like caged animals who sense deep within themselves their imminent demise and they’re lashing out haphazardly at anyone who criticizes them. In other words their castle of corruption and deceit is under siege by the cyber-warriors of free speech and with each passing day they become more and more reactive and abusive in their methodology; more sinister and underhanded in their public outcries; more devious and denial-ridden in their overall demeanor. They’ve become, as the graphic image above this article portrays, like some alien, reptilian creature from another dimension of space that’s suddenly manifested before our eyes and its vile and evil intent is now so ever-present as to be beyond question.

The only remaining question is do we as a free and open and democratic society allow this creature to continue to thrash about and destroy more and more lives as it’s purpose becomes recognizable beyond question or do we do the merciful thing and put it out of its misery? The solution is obvious. It’s time to kill section 13 and regain our nation.

—————–

[Editor’s Note: I sincerely recommend going to the website of FreeDominion.com and reading through the following threads dealing with the issues of Section 13, the Human Rights Commissions and the Tribunals. There is also much in the way of discussion surrounding the case of Abrams v. RadicalPress.com that I think many Radical Readers would enjoy.]

Please see:

Censorship by Intimidation - Harry Abrams/Richard Warman
http://www.freedominion.com.pa/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=120930

Harry Abrams joins the FD debate…
http://www.freedominion.com.pa/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=121039&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=0

CHRC: The Be-bopping Railroad
http://www.freedominion.com.pa/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=121063

Topham fails to make hard enough case in Penis Post
http://www.freedominion.com.pa/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=120748

Freedom of Speech defended in Alberta Court
http://www.freedominion.com.pa/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=121136

—————–

Arthur Topham is the Publisher and Editor of RadicalPress.com. He is currently involved in a free speech battle with the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada.

He is also in extremely dire need of financial support to sustain this battle with the forces of repression and censorship as he is not able to work during this period of intense litigation with the Canadian Human Rights Commission and the CHR Tribunal. Any donations therefore would be most welcome. Please see the following url on the Home Page (upper right hand corner) http://www.radicalpress.com/?page_id=657 regarding donations. Also there is a “DONATE” button there for Paypal or here at https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=4466120 . Feel free to use any of them if you can help out. Thanks.

Arthur welcomes all feedback to his articles and can be reached at radical@radicalpress.com .

For the Full Monty on the complaint case involving RadicalPress.com and B’nai Brith Canada please see: http://www.radicalpress.com/?page_id=995

The Silence of the Wolves
by Arthur Topham

July 16, 2009

“They’re selling you billows of smoke and calling them the fires of Freedom! They’re peddling shadows and labeling them light beams of Truth.”

~from Memos to Myself, Arthur Topham, January 1, 2009

A June 24, 2009 letter by Cal Mahan of Calgary to the Calgary Herald, appearing under the byline “Find someone new” and in response to the paper’s June 21st Editorial, “CHRC seeks more powers,” stated:

“This editorial is an updated rehash of the Feb. 13 editorial “Would-be censor seeks red pencil” and other single-minded opinion pieces. The poster boys remain the same – Mark Steyn and Ezra Levant – two unsympathetic propagandists and bullies.
Can’t you find a more attractive victim of the witch-hunting human rights commissions, who would elicit more general public affinity for your otherwise media-centric cause?”

In many respects Mahan’s comments epitomized, in two pithy sentences, the reality of Canada’s mainstream media and its current one-sided, circumscribed perspective on the issue of freedom of speech in Canada and who will be given a platform to express their perspective on this highly contentious subject. In allowing only the poster boys Levant and Steyn to monopolize this debate within the pages of the Zionist-owned media the obvious bias is showing through. The fact that the same two rogues from out of the gallery of the human rights commission’s victims are inevitably given this privilege on a regular basis doesn’t sit well with many who see the cozy set-up that appears to exist between certain ethnic/religious groups and their counterparts in the media.

It also got me thinking about my own situation with respect to this issue of who gets to be highlighted by the media and who doesn’t. In the case of myself and my website RadicalPress.com it’s now been just over two years since Harry Abrams, B.C. representative for the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada along with his co-complainant Anita Bromberg, formally laid a complaint[1] with the Canadian Human Rights Commission under the notorious Section 13(1) of the Canadian Human Rights Act seeking “relief” for contended “discriminatory” publication of articles which they felt contrived “to promote ongoing hatred affecting persons identifiable as Jews and/or as citizens of Israel.”

Since receiving word of the complaint it’s become a full time profession for me trying to stave off this blatant attempt to silence my thoughts and opinions on an issue of public interest (Zionist politics) that is growing in leaps and bounds with each passing day.

(more…)

Arthur Topham
Pub/Ed
The Radical Press
Canada’s Radical News Network
4633 Barkerville Hwy
Quesnel, B.C. V2J 6T8
radical@radicalpress.com
http://www.radicalpress.com
“Digging to the root of the issues since 1998”
——————————————————-

Dear Radical Reader,

It’s been awhile since I’ve sent out any of Pastor Eli James’s writings. This article though is one which deserves the utmost attention by anyone concerned about their loss of freedoms whether they’re christian, pagan, atheist, buddhist, muslim, taoist or none of the aforementioned. The message crosses all boundaries and borders and will ring true to anyone who’s been paying attention to global events and the erosion of our cherished rights and freedoms, especially the right to express one’s opinions without fear of the Orwellian thought police busting down your door and hauling you away to some Stalinist Bolshevik “Show Trial.”

Freedom of Speech is the penultimate and quintessential right for without it we become but slaves to the state and to anyone wielding power for control over others.

Pastor Eli James pulls no punches in his heart-felt effort to alert his fellow Americans to the dangers posed by the Zionist Beast that now stalks the planet in search of more and more victims to feed its frenzied appetite for MORE control of our bodies, minds and spirits. His efforts and words apply just as much to Canada and every other nation of the world that’s been infiltrated and had their Constitutions abducted and usurped by this megalomaniacal psychopathic entity that’s out to fulfill its self-chosen agenda of world domination and one world “international” government.

It’s methods are systematic and once realized as predictable as one’s yearly tax notice or the waxing and waning of the moon. It’s greatest tactic of course is to create FEAR in whatever manner that it can, be it 9/11 or Hiroshima or Dresden or the Gulag Archipelago. Tyranny always has feasted upon fear and used fear to enhance the breadth and scope of its menacing and grasping tentacles. It knows how starved the world is for peace and love and it uses the mentally and spiritually emaciated masses and manipulates them via its news agencies into feeling insecure and afraid, for its then that they are most vulnerable to giving up their rights and freedoms.

The forces of Darkness by any other name still reek to high heaven. They do their utmost to force the faithful of any religion to take up arms against those who worship the one God under a different name. They’ve expended millions if not billions of the people’s money and wealth to create wars where innocents are led to sacrifice their lives for principles that ultimately become meaningless when the wars cease and the only winners are the Zionist elite who’ve fomented and feasted upon them and in the end acquired even greater riches and wealth while the blood of innocents soaks the planet and democracy reels and falters from the death blows dealt to it by the greed of a small number of psychopaths.

Everyone has a right to worship God in their own way. There is only one divine Presence, one divine Cosmos, one divine Purpose and that is LOVE AND PEACE AND BROTHERHOOD AND SISTERHOOD and a reverence for this garden given to us by the ONE CREATOR for the use of ALL.

We need to think about these things and start putting the pieces of the puzzle together. Pastor Eli James has done just that with his expose of the Zionist cartel that’s now ruling the world via subterfuge and ill-gained power and wealth.

Without these three cherished Freedoms it’s highly unlikely that we will ever, as a race of human beings, achieve the fourth freedom which Norman Rockwell illustrated so beautifully and aptly in the illustrations that I’m using. The last freedom is freedom from want. Freedom from having to live on the streets, homeless and starving and existing hand to mouth because of a few power-crazed groups who want to rule the resources of the world. Freedom to feed our children and our families and enjoy the fruits of this holy garden we call the Earth Mother.

Like the four directions of the native American spiritual teachers these four freedoms are the pillars that hold up the temple of LIFE. They are now threatened by an alien force. It has to be first recognized and then resisted and stopped. God willing that will happen with the courage and conviction of all who value these four noble truths.

Please pass this article to everyone you can. The fate of freedom depends on each and every one of us doing something to ensure it carries on to our children and grandchildren.

Shine your Light for Love & Peace & Justice for All,

Arthur Topham
Pub/Ed
The Radical Press
——————————————————-

The Articles of Tyranny

by Pastor Eli James

Church of the Restoration of True Israel
http://www.anglo-saxonisrael.com/

See also:

http://www.christogenos.com
http://www.skipbaker.com
http://www.prothink.com

“In my distress I cried unto Yahweh, and He heard me. Deliver my soul, O Yahweh, from lying lips and a deceitful tongue. What shall be given unto thee, or what shall be done unto thee, thou false tongue? Sharp arrows of the mighty, with coals of juniper. Woe is me, that I sojourn in Mesech, that I dwell in the tents of Kedar! My soul hath long dwelt with him that hateth peace. I am for peace: but when I speak, they are for war.” (Psalm 120)

“Beware the leaven of the Pharisees, which is hypocrisy.” (Luke 12:1)

Introduction

This essay is about lying tongues that hate peace. May our Father, Yahweh, grant to His Children, Israel (not to be confused with the Jews), the Great Awakening, which will open their eyes to truth that will set them free.

(more…)

“KAYJAY” THE TRIBUNAL KANGAROO PONDERING POULIN’S
PLEA  TO DISMISS TOPHAM’S MOTIONS AS BEING “GROUNDLESS”
AND “VEXATIOUS”
__________________________________________________________________

[Editor’s Note: The sound of kangaroos ruminating fills the air these days as the Show Trial of 2009 continues to unfold in parts of the blogosphere and on the alternative media sites around the world.

Not to be outdone by James von Brunn’s grand-standing attack at the Holy Hoax museum in Washington, DC, RadicalPress.com publisher and editor (moi) continues to challenge the forces of evil and repression and media censorship and mind-control.

The following letter to the parties involved in this censorship, Section 13(1) attack upon Free Speech serves to show the inequities of the present Human Rights Commissions and how they are as lop-sided as a kangaroo’s ear when it comes to distinguishing between threats of violence and intellectual exercises in the realm of politics.

As this “hearing” process continues to unfold I’ve tried my utmost to record and publish every bit of information connected to it so as to provide the reader public with an ongoing overview of just how these folks operate when they try to accuse and convict a critic of Israel and of political Zionism of being a rabid hatemonger and an anti-Jewite. God willing it may help others who may become ensnarled in the Section 13 gulag known as the Canadian Human Wrongs Act.

Please pass this on to others and please help out with a donation of coin if you can. See the top right hand corner of the home page for further instructions.]

——–

RE: MOTION TO RECONSIDER RE: JUNE 2, 2009 TRIBUNAL DECISION (2) TO ALLOW THE CHRC TO ALTER EVIDENCE IN THEIR STATEMENT OF PARTICULARS

BY EMAIL

Arthur Topham
Pub/Ed
The Radical Press
Box 4633 Barkerville Hwy
Quesnel, B.C. V2J 6T8
Email: radical@radicalpress.com

June 12,  2009

Nancy Lafontant
Registry Officer
Canadian Human Rights Tribunal
Nancy.Lafontant@chrt-tcdp.gc.ca

Dear Nancy Lafontant,

RE: Harry Abrams and the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada v. Arthur Topham and the RadicalPress.com

File Number: T1360/9008

I am in receipt of both Daniel Poulin’s reply of June 10, 2009 on behalf of the Commission, and that of Marvin Kurz, of June 11, 2009 on behalf of B’nai Brith regarding my June 10, 2009 MOTION TO RECONSIDER RE: JUNE 2, 2009 TRIBUNAL DECISION (2) TO ALLOW THE CHRC TO ALTER EVIDENCE IN THEIR STATEMENT OF PARTICULARS.

It is my position that counsel for both parties are rashly concluding that this motion, as well as previous ones, rather than being given due consideration by the Tribunal based upon the arguments and evidence contained therein, be merely viewed as “vexatious” and “frivolous” and that, further, because of this assumption on their part, we (meaning myself and RadicalPress.com as Respondent) and they (the Commission and the Complainants”), are in “alternative realities” respecting the issues at hand (the latter comment being Mr. Kurz’s).

The accusation that this motion is “vexatious” and “frivolous” and simply an annoying ploy to stymie the process, plus the further accusation of Mr. Kurz that the Respondent and the Commission/Complainants are in “alternative realities,” require further comment.

Based upon the positions taken by Mr. Poulin and Mr. Kurz, it is highly evident that they are concomitantly committed to abusing the legal process within which the Commission and the Tribunal operate in order to satisfy their mutual design of downplaying the importance of following proper procedure and keeping within the parameters of the real legal system which they are attempting, rather poorly, to mimic, in accordance with their own questionable objectives.

Mr. Kurz’s comments in this context do reflect the fact that on the question of correct adherence to jurisprudence, we are living in “alternative realities.” As such, what we are witnessing here, in these rather quick, ejaculatory comments on their part, is the fact that Mr. Kurz and the Complainants (and the Commission, by default) are not only out of touch with the reality in which I am present and function in but also the reality in which their own superiors live and operate.

In this regard I would further draw Mr. Poulin’s, Mr. Kurz’s, Ms Bromberg’s, Mr. Abrams’, the Commission’s and the Tribunal’s attention to the remarkable statement released yesterday by Frank Dimant, B’Nai Brith Canada’s executive vice president, as quoted by the Ottawa Citizen on June 11, 2009, and available for verification at
http://www.ottawacitizen.com/news/Rights+commission+rejects+call+quit+policing+online+hate/1686720/story.html

           FRANK DIMANT - BBC VP
________________________________________

In that article entitled, “Rights commission rejects call to quit policing online hate” Frank Dimant unequivocally stated, regarding Section 13 of the CHRA, that:

“What the Commission is recommending is, in essence, cosmetic tinkering to deal with a human rights system that is in need of a major overhaul “

A clear reading of this article illustrates the very points which I am arguing in this complaint: that the abuse of justice and the divergence from any principle even closely resembling human or civil rights, as applied in s. 13 cases, are so blatantly obvious that even the executive level of the Complainant’s organization, B’nai Brith Canada has come out publicly calling for a major overhaul.

My motions for disclosure of documents and correct presentation of evidence, referenced and commented upon in the responses by Mr. Poulin and Mr. Kurtz, exemplify the judicial and moral imperatives at issue here and thus constitute an appeal to the Tribunal that it order the parties involved to cease and desist with the abuses of power and abuses of process being conducted against me. They not only demonstrate the necessity identified by Frank Dimant’s public call, but also identify the fact that the “alternative reality” occupied by the CHRC and the Complainants is a perverse judicial Twilight Zone and a renegade digression from the “reality” espoused by the executive level of the Complainants’ own organization and, not least, the formal and real judicial system which all Canadians are subject to.

If there is any further formality or motion that you require, please let me know as soon as possible.

Sincerely,

Arthur Topham pro se
Publisher/Editor
The RadicalPress.com

Cc:
Anita Bromberg, Co-complainant
Marvin Kurz, Complainant Counsel
Harry Abrams, Complainant
Daniel Poulin, Commission counsel
Douglas Christie, Intervenor, Canadian Free Speech League

                     Paul Fromm, B.Ed, M.A.
Director
Canadian Association for Free Expression (CAFE)
_________________________________________________

As Publisher and Editor of RadicalPress.com I was most pleased and honoured to hear today from Paul Fromm, Director of CAFE, the Canadian Association for Free Expression, informing me that he has formally submitted a Notice of Motion to the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal requesting standing as an Interested Party in the ongoing complaint case involving myself, RadicalPress.com and Harry Abrams and the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada.

Paul brings with him a wealth of personal experience in dealing with the notorious Section 13(1) legislation contained in the Canadian Human Rights Act and should his organization be granted Intervenor status will undoubtedly be of immense value in highlighting the inequities and injustices which this particular piece of legislation poses to Internet users across Canada and all Canadians concerned about their basic human rights contained within Canada’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms which guarantee free expression to all citizens of this great nation.

I will be waiting with great anticipation to hear from the Tribunal on Paul’s application. God willing he won’t have to jump through all the hoops that Free Speech lawyer Doug Christie had to.

On behalf of myself and all those who are fighting this battle to regain our basic rights I want to thank Paul for his efforts and willingness to participate in this case.

Arthur Topham
Publisher/Editor
RadicalPress.com
————————–

Canadian Association for Free Expression
Box 332,
Rexdale, Ontario, M9W 5L3
Ph: 905-274-3868
FAX: 905-278-2413

Paul Fromm, B.Ed, M.A.
Director

Canadian Human Rights Tribunal
160 Elgin Street
11th Floor,
Ottawa, ON.,
K1A 1J4

Attention:  Nancy Lafontant, Registry Officer

Fax: 613 995-3484

June 10, 2009

Harry Abrams and the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada v. Arthur Topham and the RadicalPress.com

File Number: T1360/9008

Dear Ms Lafontant:

I write seeking leave to make a motion to obtain standing as an Interested Party making written and oral submissions in the matter of Harry Abrams and the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada v. Arthur Topham and the RadicalPress.com

I rely on the provisions of Rule 8(1) of the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal Rules Of Procedure (03-05-04):

8(1) Anyone who is not a party, and who wishes to be recognized by the Panel as an interested party in respect of an inquiry, may bring a motion for an order granting interested party status.

CAFE’s  mandate is to work toward the maximum latitude of the freedom of speech, freedom of the press and freedom of belief provisions of Sec. 2(b) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Founded in 1981, we have published extensively material supportive of these goals, made representations to various levels of government and obtained intervenor or Interested Party status in a number of cases.

We are especially concerned about efforts to restrict the Internet, which we see as an inexpensive and accessible medium to persons of modest means who might otherwise be excluded from some of the older more established media. We obtained Interested Party status in the Zundel Internet case (1997-2002), were an active participant, calling witnesses and making submissions. We were equally active in the Micka Internet case (2001). We participated as an “interested party” in more than 30 days of hearings in Toronto, Mississauga, Ottawa and Oakville in Warman v Marc Lemire.

Our perspective and experience may be of assistance to the Tribunal in considering that CAFE, as an “interested party” has appeared as an intervenor in more Sec. 13 Internet cases than any other entity in Canada. Furthermore, Mr. Fromm has extensive experience — more than any other person — as an agent in Sec. 13 cases (Warman v. Glen Bahr and Western Canada for Us; Warman v. Terry Tremaine; Warman v. Jessica Beaumont; Warman v. Ciaan Donnelly; Warman v. Melissa Guille and Canadian Heritage Alliance; Warman v. Jason Ouwendyk and the Northern Alliance; Canadian Centre for Research-Action on Race Relations v. BCWhitepride.com)

(more…)

[Editor’s Note: The image above was the logo for the Quesnel Multicultural Society which was formed back in 1983. The design was by a local graphic artist by the name of Jason Curtis who was a very close friend of mine. I was one of the founding members of this organization. Some people, like those who represent B’nai Brith Canada would rather that I was a founding member of a white supremacist organization or a neo-Nazi organization or some other org that they could then point to and say “Look, we told you so! He’s a racist and an anti-Semite and a hatemonger. See! See! See!”

The following Motion was sent to the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal in response to the Tribunal’s recent ruling on a previous motion of mine regarding the Canadian Human Rights Commission’s tampering with evidence crucial to the complaint case now before the Tribunal. For some as yet unknown reason the Commission is claiming that it doesn’t have in its files the one document which the Complainant Harry Abrams was the MOST vociferous about in his feigned outrage over articles posted on RadicalPress.com that he claims are promoting “hatred toward Jews and/or citizens of Israel.”

The article in question is The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion which can be found at: http://www.radicalpress.com/?page_id=601 This motion makes it clear to the Commission that they are not playing fair in allowing the Commission to attempt to pull the wool over my eyes and the eyes of the public in allowing this obvious miscarriage to continue.

Harry Abrams, in a letter to the Quesnel Cariboo Observer, back in January of 2008 clearly states that he complained of this document to the Commission yet the Commission is trying to say that they don’t have it in their files. Not only that but they’ve been carrying on in a most un-judical manner in parroting the rants of the Zionist B’nai Brith about the terribly and aweful nature of this roadmap of the 20th Century.

It’s difficult for many people to imagine that an organization like this would stoop to such low tactics but when one begins to pull away the veil that that these people hide behind such actions appear to be standard practise within the Canadian “Human Rights” Commissariat.]

——–

MOTION FOR FURTHER DISCLOSURE OF DOCUMENTS FROM COMPLAINANTS ABRAMS AND THE LEAGUE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS OF B’NAI BRITH CANADA
BY EMAIL

Arthur Topham
Pub/Ed
The Radical Press
Box 4633 Barkerville Hwy
Quesnel, B.C. V2J 6T8
Email: radical@radicalpress.com  

June 9,  2009

Nancy Lafontant
Registry Officer
Canadian Human Rights Tribunal
Nancy.Lafontant@chrt-tcdp.gc.ca

Dear Nancy Lafontant,

RE: Harry Abrams and the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada v. Arthur Topham and the RadicalPress.com
File Number: T1360/9008

The enclosed motion is in regard to the June 2, 2009 email letter from the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal containing Tribunal member Karen Jensen’s decision with respect to my motion (1) of April 22, 2009, to rescind Daniel Poulin’s denial of further disclosure of documents.

In her decision Tribunal member Jensen makes two relevant statements which bear upon this current motion:

The first, with respect to the Commission’s statement that “because of its very nature as one of the most notorious anti-Semitic pieces of literature ever created; there should be no need to have a party disclose it”, Jensen states, “The parties are reminded that they are subject to an ongoing duty to disclose all documents in their possession that are arguably relevant to the case whether anti-Semitic or not.”

Jensen’s second statement concerns the Commission’s avowed position that it does not possess the contentious document known as The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion and therefore cannot be expected to disclose it in its Statement of Particulars as requested by the Respondent.

In her ruling, Jensen states, “”However, if a document is not in a party’s possession, it cannot be disclosed. I take Commission counsel’s word that the Commission is not in possession of the document entitled “Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion”.

What this ruling establishes thus far, regarding my motion of April 22, 2009, is that the Tribunal is taking the “word” of Commission counsel that the Commission doesn’t possess said document but that if any “arguably relevant” document is in the possession of any of the parties it is their “duty” to disclose it.

(more…)

OUTSTANDING IN HIS FIELD, RADICALPRESS.COM PUBLISHER ARTHUR TOPHAM REFLECTS IN “COTTONWOOD GOTHIC” STYLE UPON THE GROWING STENCH FROM INCREASING GOVERNMENT AND MEDIA CONTROL THAT THREATEN CANADA’S BASIC RIGHTS & FREEDOMS.
____________________________________________________________________________

Living in the small village of Cottonwood in the foothills of the Cariboo Mountain range east of Quesnel, B.C. our elevation (2950 feet) gives us just a little more of winter than our neighbours down along the Fraser River to the west. As such we daren’t plant our above-ground crops until around the end of first week of June which is right around the time of this writing.

Generally, planting and preparing the ground is nothing out of the ordinary but this year it’s an added burden to an already overloaded schedule. Thanks to B’nai Brith Canada and their “hate crimes” charge that I’ve been accused of, my time is overwhelmingly consumed in countless hours indoors in my study preparing articles and legal documents and communicating with other freedom of speech lovers around the world. While my eastern neighbour Daniel Poulin, Counsel for the Canadian Human Rights Commission, is out on the weekend playing golf or tending to his flower garden knowing that his pay cheque is in the mail, I’m fretting about trying to dig up enough coin for a gallon of gasoline to power the rototiller and hopefully get the ground ready for all those yummie vegies that my lovely wife has waiting in the greenhouse.

But, still, we must be thankful for the little things that country living brings with it. One of my neighbours up the road has a couple of horses which he and his wife care for and ride. Thanks to their efforts (the horses, that is) a valuable amount of manure is produced over the winter months of feeding in the barn and thanks to the efforts of myself and my dear wife, we were able to haul home a copious amount of the valuable, natural fertilizer for our garden.

It’s a good example of holistic living. Robert Hunter, I know, would have appreciated the symbiotic symbolism of the whole process.

And so, while forking the horseshit into buckets to then be transferred to the flat-deck of my ol’ Dodge, I found myself singing a little ditty that for some months now just seems to pop into my head whenever I’m preoccupied with the whole issue of the “hate crime” that I’ve been charged with along with all of the characters or actors in this little melodrama. It’s a take off on an old Beatles tune, from the White album I believe, called Rocky Raccoon. It goes like this:

“Her name was Magill and she called herself Lil, but everyone [at the Registry] knew her as Nancy.”

Readers who have been following this “Show Trial” put on for the taxpaying public by the Canadian Human Rights Commission and its partner-in-crime the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal, will recognize that “Magill” is really Nancy Lafontant the Registry Officer for the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal located in Ottawa, Ontario. It is to her that all matters concerning this complaint case are sent by the parties involved. She’s sorta like the flak-catcher who passes on whatever to the head honchos working behind (presumably) locked, windowless doors with big, ugly rent-a-cop, security goons barring the entrance to terrorists and “hate mongers” such as myself who might for whatever reason suddenly take it upon ourselves to go and pay these faceless commissars a visit.

I haven’t a clue what Nancy is really like other than that her use of the English language appears challenging at times but, seeing as how her name is constantly before me on my computer screen, I fantasize about the sort of person that would hold such a position in such a crazy, quasi-judicial organization as the CHR Tribunal.

Then of course one line leads to another and the next one goes:

“Now she and her man who called himself Dan(iel) were in the next room at the hoe-down.”

Suddenly it all began to fall into place for me. Obviously “Dan” can be no other than Daniel Poulin, Counsel for the CHRC who likely resides in the same building that Nancy works in. Now I’m beginning to really sense the degree of conspiracy that’s unfolding here! Both of them are French-Canadians and both of them have trouble (it seems) understanding the English language; in particular Dan, who appears to be extra-challenged by short phrases such as, “and/or citizens of Israel” which, when he sees it written in legal, complaint forms, filled out meticulously by such experienced “hate crimes” fighters as Harry Abrams of the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada (recall Abrams’ famous case against the octogenarian WW2 war hero Doug Collins), he translates into the phrase “and/or other non-whites.” Now, while I and many readers who are following this grotesque gong show, find this rather odd and downright dastardly and dirty-pool, it appears that the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal doesn’t seem to see anything unusual in such disastrous changes to the English language.

In her June 2, 2009 ruling on a motion that I filed with the Tribunal requesting that Dan correct his error Tribunal member Karen Jensen denied my motion that the Commission amend its false statement and replace it with the original true one contained in the original true complaint document originally sent to the Commission by Harry Abrams, the originally true Complainant.

For Tribunal member Karen Jensen, what was originally complained of to the CHRC and which now doesn’t appear in the Commission’s Statement of Particulars, is merely a “mischaracterized” misapprehension on my part and an issue that she feels can be worked out or resolved during the actual hearing. It was after reading that not-too-subtle subterfuge of a decision, that the scent of the horse manure I’d been shoveling began to waft upwards again in my mind’s nostrils.

Having been born and raised on a farm the smell of horse manure is as natural to me as the smell of fresh milk rising up from the bucket at milking time. In many ways it’s really not that bad a smell compared with the chemicals that now flood the market and over the years, when farmers and the public generally were less prone to take the word of government folks as gospel, the connotation between the two naturally evolved over time.

Anyhow, the tune lingered on and I could see in my mind’s eye Nancy and Dan, in the Tribunal office somewhere, sharing a soy latte and joking around and talking French to each other and possibly even carrying on flirtatiously when no one or no cameras were visible. All this going on in my head in my neighbour’s barn thousands upon thousands of miles away from Canada’s capital city and all because of a scheming, no-good-for-nothing little piece of chicken-shit legislation (sec. 13(1)) placed carefully into the Canadian Human Rights Act by alien forces inimical to freedom of speech and freedom of the internet.

Horse manure is good for the garden. So is chicken shit. But whether or not the manure which is being shoveled out to the Canadian public via our federal politicians and the MSM regarding Canada’s “hate” laws will prove beneficial to the growing sense of suspicion that surrounds these misplaced organizations waits to be seen. In the meantime I’ll just keep working along here at the ol’ Mac with my rubber boots on and my pitch fork close at hand.

THE ZUNDEL TRIAL & FREE SPEECH
By Douglas Christie, B.A., L.L.B.
February 25, 1985

                  DOUGLAS CHRISTIE, B.A., L.L.B.
__________________________________________________________

[EDITOR’S NOTE: In the Introduction to this small booklet published by C-FAR back in 1985, then President of the Canadian Association for Free Expression, Daryl Reside, wrote:

“In this booket, C-FAR’s Canadian Issues Series is publishing excerpts from defence lawyer Doug Christie’s spirited summation to the jury at the Ernst Zundel trial. This summation was delivered February 25, 1985.

Zundel had been charged under Section 177 of the Criminal Code for having knowingly published false news that was likely to be injurious to the public good. In his ringing defence, Christie seeks to establish: 1) that credible reasons existed for much of what Zundel published; that is, he had justification and arguments for his point of view; 2) that he sincerely believed what he wrote and, therefore, did not knowingly publish falsehoods; and 3) that  a diversity of opinions, however controversial they may be, is vital to a democracy and in no way harms the public good. Threading its way throughout the entire summation is Christie’s passionate view that, right or wrong, a man must be permitted to search for the truth and express his point of view.

 It is this fierce commitment to principle and to liberty that makes this summation an important historical document…. It should also be noted that Zundel nowhere advocated illegal or violent acvtions in the two pamphlets in which he was accused of violating Section 177.”

It is now going on 25 years, a quarter of a century, since Doug Christie gave this summation to the jury in February of 1985. In the interim period the forces of censorship and repression have been successful in punishing Ernst Zundel to the max and he now sits in a dungeon in Zionist-occupied Germany and has been jailed for over six years already for having committed the gravest crime of the 20th Century: Speaking the truth.

Obviously the battle to end censorship is far from over. In my own case with these same Zionist Jew forces working through B’nai Brith Canada’s League for “Human Rights”, we see their relentless and calculated designs continuing to unfold before the public’s now awakening eyes. The war for freedom of speech continues.]

                 DOUG CHRISTIE’S SUMMATION TO THE JURY IN 1985

Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, it’s my role as counsel, to address you now and speak to you about the position of the defence. My first observation is that probably never before in the history of your country, have twelve people had to grapple with a more all-encompassing and serious issue than you will have to deal with. When you have finished your deliberations, in all probability your country will be made different, for as long as you and I will live, by the decision that you will make here about the most serious issues that confront any citizen in a free society.

You have spent seven weeks examining the evidence in one of the most wide-scoped cases in the history of Canadian jurisprudence. I said at the beginning, and I repeat to you now, that this is a case that should never have been before a court of law in a free society because it is an issue upon which courts will have no of difficulty in addressing and dealing with. If you have a clear understanding of the role of freedom in a free society, this may never have to happen again, because a clear indication that we permit and tolerate debate and points of view we may not agree with from a jury of twelve ordinary citizens will be the strongest indication to every politician in this country that we are not subject to the pressures of groups dictating ideas and determining how other people will think, act, and speak.

I suggest to you now that what you have heard in these seven weeks is a lot more information on the subject of the book, Did Six Million Really Die?, than you or I might ever have thought at first was likely to occur. I suggest that we have all learned something in this process. Tolerance, is indeed, one of the things that you have learned by hearing another side to a point that we always thought was so clear and so simple. But to everything we know in life, there are two sides, and many more quite often, and nobody, no matter how well informed or how expert, has all the truth, or ever will.

It should be for the law to determine the extent of debate in a free society. It shouldn’t be forced upon judges and courts to decide what is the truth about some historical belief. It’s nobody’s fault in this room that we are here. It is the duty of every one of us to do our duty as we are, lawyers, judges, jurors, but really it was a wrong political decision to bring before you and me the duty to examine history 40 years old to determine where the truth lies. It is a question that never should have been here. But having been placed in this position, we must deal with it, and we must deal with it to preserve important values in our society.

The first and most important value is the freedom to debate, the freedom to think, the freedom to speak and the freedom to disagree. This prosecution, has already had a very serious effect on those freedoms. If it were to result in a conviction, I suggest to you that a process of witch-hunting would begin in our society where everyone who had a grievance against anyone else would say “Uh-huh, you are false, and I’ll take you or pressure somebody else to take you to court and force you to defend yourself.” Even though our society says, as it always has, in this and every other charge, the burden’s on the Crown, the burden to prove every ingredient is on the Crown, the burden to prove that the thing is false is on the Crown, where does the accused stand? He’s here. He’s been here like you, at his own expense for seven weeks and whatever may become of this case, he’s already paid a very high price for the belief that he had the right to speak what he believed to be the truth.

(more…)

The real political advisers who are directing MP Harper’s Con-serve-Israel government
_________________________________________________________________________

[Editor’s Note: Mr. Rogers is an octogenarian with the political perspicacity of a wise Elder.

There was a time when cultures respected the words of their Elders as is still traditionally so in Native American circles.

Maybe it’s time we once again began paying homage to those who have the courage to speak out in defense of their country when even to do so is deemed to be politically incorrect by some.

I, for one, hold Grenville’s advice in the deepest of respect and admiration and thus would admonish other Canadians who believe in their country and its prized possessions of freedom of speech and political and spiritual sovereignty to do as he has done. Speak out! Voice your opinions without fear and with conviction and sincerity and the knowledge that what you are doing WILL have a positive effect upon others. If we are to ever regain our footings as an independent and free country and repossess our respect and our integrity then we MUST face our enemies who, from within, are hell-bent on destroying all that Canada once was that made her great and glorious.

Please pass this vitally important letter on to as many concerned Canadians as you can think of.]

————-

Mr. Irving R. Gerstein, CFO
Conservative Party of Canada Fundraiser
Irving R GERSTEIN irving_gerstein@conservativefund.ca

Dear Mr Gerstein:

Mr. Gerstein, I am very concerned about the future of my country, and the direction in which our current Prime Minister is forcing us to go.

In good conscience, I cannot, and therefore will not longer support a party or government that does not act in the best interests of Canada and Canadians, a government which supports terrorism, as does the CPC under its present leader.  The party and its leader practice deceit and hypocrisy, and act in secrecy. I am convinced that not one single Canadian really trusts this leader or government, or Mr. Ignatieff or Mr. Layton. Integrity, at every level, is conspicuous by its complete and utter absence.

Mr. Harper has proven to be a dictator, not a leader of a democracy, which Canada pretends to be. Canada was, at one time in the distant past, close to being a democracy.  Canada has never been a democracy.

Canada is defintely not the “Free and Democratic” country that our erstwhile leader(s) trumpet it to be. We certainly do not have “Freedom of Expression for all” and we are demonstrably not democratic. Canadians live under the most powerful dictatorship in the world. Canada’s PM Harper has placed Canada in the deadly vortex of the doomed “USS Titanic”. He will not be a captain that goes down with his ship. Mr. Harper also has clearly demonstrated that he now worships at the Trinitarian Synagogue (Israel, Judaism, Zionism)., the central dogma of which is the gospel of a sacred holocaust.

Do you get that strange feeling of being surrounded by foreign interest groups?
__________________________________________________________________________

The leader and party have declared support for a particular religion, Judaism, over all other religions. This is odious, especially in light of the supremacist teachings of the most holy book of Judaism, the Babylonian Talmud.

PM Harper, as does each puppet US President, takes his cue and orders from the Israel Lobby.

President Ariel Sharon was very blunt, straightforward and truthful, when, on 3 October 2001, he told Mr. Shimon Peres, as reported on Kol Yisrael radio, that “We, the Jewish people, control America, and the Americans know it.”

Mr. Sharon’s complete statement to Mr. Shimon Peres is: “Every time we do something, you tell me America will do this and will do that … I want to tell you something very clear: Don’t worry about American pressure on Israel.  We, the Jewish people, control America, and the Americans know it.”

Menachim Begin, Former Prime Minister of Israel, declared:

“Our race is the Master Race.
We are divine Gods on this planet.
We are as different from the inferior races as they are from insects.
Compared to our race, other races are beasts and animals, cattle at best.
Other races are considered as human excrement.
Our destiny is to rule over the inferior races.
Our earthly kingdom will be ruled by our leader with a rod of iron.
The masses will lick our feet, and serve us as our slaves.”

I find these statements most disturbing, especially in light of PM Harper’s total commitment to Israel and to the defense of Judaism.  Perhaps you are similarly concerned.

B’nia Brith International - secret society of Zionists hiding
behind Canada’s infamous Section 13(1) gag laws
___________________________________________________________________
Mr. Harper is the most dangerous PM that Canada has ever had. Deceitfully following in the footsteps of his predecessors as regards the NAU (North American Union). He professes to be an economist, yet has no idea of, let alone intention of using the Bank of Canada to finance true infrastructure, and the maintenance of existing true infrastructure.

He, all by his dictatorial self, commits billions of the taxpayers’ hard-earned dollars to military equipment and foreign policy misadventures. But he never tells Canadians where that money comes from. He is mortgaging our great-grandchildren’s lives. He could and should, but will not use the BOC (Bank of Canada) for true infrastructure  projects that benefit Canada and Canadians.

Please convey these concerns and the warnings implicit in them, to PM Harper. Thank you.

Respectfully,

Grenville Rogers
grogers@vianet.ca

[Editor’s Note: The following letter to Ms. Cohen is in response to her article of May 19th, 2009 in the National Post. (Please see bottom of this page for the url and the story.)

It’s a good start both for her and for the Zionist-controlled National Post. While there’s no good reason to be hopeful that either of them are serious about initiating any form of open debate on either Zionism or the domestic and foreign policies of the state of Israel, Ms. Cohen’s critique of the Canadian Jewish Congress and B’nai Brith Canada does cut to the quick and on the surface at least exposes the growing dichotomy that appears to exist between these pro-Zionist lobbyists and the remainder of Canada’s Jewish population. For whatever reasons  Jews like Ms. Cohen are speaking out finally and stating their dissatisfaction with the manner in which these pressure groups attempt to speak for all Jews while at the same time they use their inordinate and powerful influence to censor the rest of Canadians whose views they deem inimical to their own interests.

Ms. Cohen’s revelations regarding the Harper government’s blatant patronage toward orgs like the CJC are also quite revealing, especially I would imagine, for the majority of grassroots Conservative supporters who voted unanimously back in 2008 to rid this country of Section 13(1) of the CHR Act and strip the CHR Commission of its powers to censor free speech and the Internet.]

—————–

May 21, 2009
Dear Ms. Cohen,

I’m sure that by now you are sufficiently swamped with a backlog of responses to your challenging and impenitent critique of Canada’s foremost players in the censorship game but nonetheless I must add my comments as well.

As one non-Jewish Canadian who is being directly impacted by B’nai Brith Canada due to a Sec. 13(1) complaint launched against myself and my website http://www.radicalpress.com by this foreign lobbyist group, see http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=821 CHRC Complaint Against RadicalPress.com from Harry Abrams and B’nai Brith Canada, November 20, 2007, I can honestly say that your concerns about their methods of addressing issues of “hate” and “anti-Semitism,” etc. are both welcome and sorely needed.

For the most part I can only concur with your assessment of CJC and BBC although I would call you on one point in your article where you tend to tow the same party line as these Zionist lobbyists, that being your misunderstanding of Hamas.

Why Laura, given your purported awareness of current affairs, would you use the term “stealth normalization” to describe what very simply and honestly should be called the “open recognition” of the fact that Hamas is/was the democratically and duly elected government of the Palestinian people of Gaza?

Seeing as how internationally it is an historically recognized fact; one unfortunately which the governments of Israel, the USA, (and, deplorably) Canada have failed to come to terms with for blatant political reasons and have thus deigned to foster the erroneous deception that somehow Hamas is either of the two misconceptions which you have suggested in your article, I would think that you would acknowledge this reality and not add to the misconceptions already introduced into Canadian jurisprudence by the very forces you are attempting to correct in your fine article.

(more…)

http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/tyranny2.htm#The%20Hidden%20Tyranny

The Harold Wallace Rosenthal Interview: The Hidden Tyranny (1976) Part 2

UNPLUG, TURN OFF, TUNE OUT – USE THE INTERNET & START THINKING!
__________________________________________________________________________

The Hidden Tyranny
Part Two

“Most Jews do not like to admit it, but our god is Lucifer.”

The above is an exact quote of Harold Wallace Rosenthal, former top Administrative Aide to the then Senator Jacob Jayits, who was since defeated in the 1980 election.

I, Walter White, Jr., for the past 17 years Director and Editor of the monthly conservative publication WESTERN FRONT, was told about Mr. Rosenthal’s boastings around Washington, D.C., and I was encouraged to meet with him and to interview him (for a fee).

Mr. Rosenthal had stated publicly that the Jews will completely dominate throughout the entire world — and that they control every facet of political life in America and every aspect of the communication media. (Mr. R’s emphasis).

Eventually Mr. Rosenthal and l were brought together, at which time I interviewed him privately and taped said interview with Mr. Rosenthal’s knowledge and consent. During the lengthy meeting Mr. Rosenthal became impatient, rude and vulgar (all of which is recorded on the tape) and he sought the balance of his fee before I had concluded my questioning.

Since the entire interview was so lengthy, in 1977 we released and published only the first portion under the same title as above “THE HIDDEN TYRANNY.” Copies of this manuscript (Part I) have been sought by people from all around the globe. We now release the balance of the taped interview as Part Two. Although I do not wish to digress, an Eastern analyst has told me that “The Hidden Tyranny” manuscript (Part I) has had a pass-on readership of 3.5%. Thus, if true, the manuscript (Part I) has been read by more than 7 MILLION people. When this final portion (Part Two) begins circulating, its impact may be even greater. It depends upon you, the reader.

Before any agreement was reached between us, I had established with Mr. Rosenthal that he would answer an unlimited number of questions with complete honesty and to the best of his ability. It was because of this understanding that I took issue with Mr. Rosenthal during the final stages of the interview and accused him of not being honest with me as it related to his response to my question: “Do you have knowledge of WHEN and WHY the story began about the Jews being God’s chosen people?” That is when he said in part: “Most Jews do not like to admit it, but our god is Lucifer — so I wasn’t lying — and we are his chosen people. Lucifer is very much alive.”

As this goes to press, we still seek a governmental body to investigate Harold Rosenthal’s allegations. My dictionary conveys such allegations as “TREASON.”

We now pick up after a dispute during which the tape recorder has been turned off.

(more…)

http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/tyranny1.htm#The%20Hidden%20Tyranny
The Harold Wallace Rosenthal Interview: The Hidden Tyranny (1976) Part 1

UNPLUG, TURN OFF, TUNE OUT – USE THE INTERNET & START THINKING!

___________________________________________________________________________

INTRODUCTION

This article contains the text of a most revealing and shocking interview of a Jew by the name of Harold Rosenthal, which was conducted in 1976, by a concerned patriot, a Walter White, Jr.. Mr. Rosenthal, an influential Jew learned in the Jewish ways and involved in the workings of government in Washington, D.C., explained the Jewish involvement and cause of the major problems we face today.

Rosenthal, in exposing certain aspects of the ‘inner invisible world of Jewry’, revealed the modes and tactics Jews have used in destroying Christian civilization and covertly attaining control over our lives and governments. The result has been a ‘hidden tyranny’ upon us like the tyranny waged against the Saints by the red beast system of Revelation referred to as ‘Mystery Babylon’.

But how could such a small number of Jews enslave so many people and gain such an overwhelming control over their governments, especially without their being aware of it? The answer to this may be found in Christ’s parable of the unjust steward, which represents Jewry. They are able to prevail in the world despite their ungodly ways because of their cunning and shrewd ways. As Christ said “For the children of this world are in their generation wiser than the children of light.” (Luke 16:8)

In other words, the Jew, with his worldly mind set, is wiser than God’s Christian people. When you read the words of Mr. Rosenthal the reality of this statement will come to light. This problem was so prevalent and important for us to overcome that Christ had instructed us to “be wise as serpents“. (Matthew 10:16)

America and the world is now covered in political, economic, moral and social problems which need to be acted upon by Christian people. As Edmund Burke stated: “The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.” But before we can properly act we need a proper (not just a superficial) understanding of the problem. This article will help provide the reader with that understanding.

(more…)