Welcome to 2017! from Radical Press

ashall1500

HAPPY NEW YEAR!

Dear Radical Readers,

My wife Shasta and I spend New Year’s eve at our local community hall in Cottonwood, B.C. enjoying a wonderful pot-luck dinner and then playing country music with our friends and neighbours.

2017 is now here and it promises to be another exciting year of global turmoil and unexpected surprises both good and bad!

On behalf of Radical Press I want to wish all subscribers and readers the very best in the days and months ahead and thank everyone for their ongoing support throughout my own “trials” and tribulations in the Canadian justice system.

This coming March will see the results of my Charter challenge to the infamous “Hate Crime” legislation now contained in Sec. 318 to 320 of Canada’s Criminal Code. Until then it’s back to the waiting game and carrying on with publishing as much truth and real news as possible.

I’m still trying to raise money to cover legal expenses (what’s new!) so any help in defraying these costs is always appreciated. If you’re not already deep in debt to the Rothschilds after all the Christmas spending spree then you might want to check into my GoGetFunding site and add a bit more to it.

Most politically-minded folks around the world are now awaiting with baited breath the inauguration of Donald Trump as the 45th President of the United States of America and debating and wondering what his administration will do in order to improve the global situation which has been steadily growing darker and darker. Will it be the Zionist business as usual or something possibly dramatic and positive? Time will soon tell but the odds are not in the truth-lovers and peace-makers favour and so we must remain vigilant and strong and continue to sing the songs of freedom come what may.

God bless and keep us all.

 

Sincerely,

Arthur Topham
Pub/Ed
The Radical Press
Canada’s Radical News Network
“Digging to the root of the issues since 1998”
––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

AND LEST WE FORGET

hatecrimelawbbccjc-copy

Tenure’s End: Foreign Israeli Lobby B’nai Brith Attacks Canada’s Longstanding Academic Tradition to Safeguard Freedom of Speech

Tenure’s End: Foreign Israeli lobby B’nai Brith Attacks Canada’s

Longstanding Academic Tradition to Safeguard Freedom of Speech

By Arthur Topham

The foreign, Jew’s-only, secret Masonic lobby organization B’nai Brith Canada and its ADL-ed component the League for ‘Human Rights’ of B’nai Brith are on a rampage through Cyberspace in their ongoing attempts to destroy Canadian’s constitutionally guaranteed Charter right to freedom of expression.

One of the most recent, egregious examples by this traitorous, Israel-sponsored, Fifth Columnist organization is their  despicable attempt to destroy Canada’s longstanding tradition of academic Tenureship via their relentless, underhanded attacks upon tenured Professor Anthony Hall of the University of Lethbridge, Alberta.

Using every dirty trick in their bag of lies, this traitorous “benevolent society” of Zionist Jew, duel-citizens  have been falsely maligning Professor Hall both in their Zionist-controlled mainstream media and via Canada’s legal system through their misuse of provincial “Human Rights” organizations.

The usual plethora of slander, lies, vilification, ugly epithets and guilt by association, coupled with copious amounts of arrogant innuendo, are their standard psycho-weapons of destruction and in the case of Professor Hall they’ve pulled out all the stops.

I have been covering Professor Hall’s plight for some time and observing how this Public Enemy #1 of Canadian sovereignty, B’nai Brith Canada, has been viciously libeling Hall in their Jewish publications both here in Canada and in the foreign state of Israel’s  media outlets as well as in the mainstream media.

It’s well beyond time that Canadians WAKE UP and smell the kosher coffee that’s been brewing beneath their noses for decades and realize that this subversive agent of the foreign state of Israel is quickly destroying the underpinnings of Canadian culture through their blatant attempts to dismantle and subvert every level of the nation’s government, media, judiciary and, now, academia.

Watch the above video and listen carefully to the words of Professor Anthony Hall and TAKE HEED! If this apocalyptic beast hidden with the Trojan Horse called “B’nai Brith Canada” isn’t collared and put on a leash soon all hell will be breaking loose as our rights and freedoms dissolve and we shift into either a state of anarchy or totalitarian dictatorship.

Please share this article with your friends and associates and if you can, write to those persons listed below and tell them how you feel about this deplorable affront to Canada’s freedom.

Those concerned about the B’nai Brith’s assault on Professor Anthony Hall can contact Lethbridge University President Mike Mahon. Email: mike.mahon@uleth.ca and cc contactmeliorist@gmail.com  program@ckxu.com  antoniusjameshall@gmail.com

Write, fax, or phone: Mike Mahon President & Vice-Chancellor A762 University Hall, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada  T1K 3M4. Phone: (403) 329 -2201. Fax: (403) 329-2097.

There is also a Petition that’s been started where you can help support Professor Hall and our rights and freedoms. Here’s the link:

https://www.change.org/p/kurt-e-schlachter-kurt-e-schlachter-step-down-as-chair-of-the-board-university-of-lethbridge

As the old saying goes, “JUST DO IT!” The time for hesitation is long past. Let’s put our country’s freedoms ahead of our own petty and personal agendas for a change and start standing up for CANADA instead of kowtowing to the interests of a foreign, racist nation!

—–

Canadian professor libelously targeted as “anti-semite” in coordinated attack by RAFIQ for the American Herald Tribune

amhertribune

http://ahtribune.com/world/americas/1225-canadian-professor-anti-semite.html

 

halllibelhdr

In his Now Magazine article “Facebook Removes Anti-Semitic Post after Online Blowback,” Bernie Farber explains that “the Facebook ravings on the social media site of Anthony Hall,” a tenured professor at the University of Lethbridge in Alberta, have been identified as anti-Semitic. This statement might lead readers to believe that there were anti-Semitic ravings by Dr. Hall on his Facebook page, but as the article makes clear, there are no examples of such ravings by Dr. Hall, only by “one Glen Davidson,” who we are told posted these ravings on Dr. Hall’s page.

Farber goes on to state that Dr. Hall “has publicly embraced the ridiculous and obnoxious notions of Gerard Menuhin, who has purported to have proof that the Holocaust is a myth.”

Farber does not attempt to dismiss any of this proof, as one might expect an objective journalist to do, but instead takes the position that such proof can be dismissed out of hand as false without any investigation.

By comparison, Dr. Hall sounds like the more reasonable person for having actually looked at Menuhin’s book Tell the Truth and Shame the Devil. Note, too, that when Hall says “I’m reading that text and having to reassess a lot of ideas,” he does not say that he has changed his ideas, only that he is reassessing his ideas. Again, Hall sounds like the more courageous thinker for his willingness to reassess his thinking on a narrative as seemingly sacrosanct as the Jewish holocaust.

Having not yet said anything that convinces me Dr. Hall is an anti-Semite, Farber adds, “Hall reportedly linked Israel’s intelligence service, Mossad, with 9/11.” The role of Mossad, along with the CIA, in the 9/11 attacks is a fact well documented by credible journalists and scholars and widely disseminated online and in books. It is public knowledge and in the public domain. To admit the role of Mossad and the CIA in 9/11 is to admit the villainy of national governments and their foreign policies. Jewish identity and anti-Semitism have nothing to do with it.

Regarding  the anti-Semitic Facebook post that did not even originate with Dr. Hall, Farber writes, “To the best of my knowledge, Hall was never moved to delete this post himself.” An unbiased journalist would have contacted Dr. Hall and asked him about this matter. Well, I did contact Dr. Hall, and he informed me that he didn’t even know that the post was up on the “wall” of his Facebook page until after it had been taken down and after he had learned of the resulting controversy. So, here again, Farber offers no proof that Dr. Hall is even remotely anti-Semitic.

Not only that, but Dr. Hall’s award-winning two-volume book The Bowl with One Spoon, published by respected arbiter of scholarly history McGill-Queen’s University Press, gives every indication that Dr. Hall is the opposite of a racist, particularly in light of his deep commitment to exposing the plight of Indigenous peoples. Indeed, renowned Canadian scholar Naomi Klein, who happens to be Jewish, doesn’t seem to think that Dr. Hall is a racist either. On the cover of Dr. Hall’s book, she writes, “I cannot overstate the importance of this book. If used properly, it could change the world.”

Nonetheless, Farber goes on to bemoan that “the combined efforts of B’nai B’rith Canada and the Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs were unable to move the University of Lethbridge to take action against Hall.” I would like to believe that this unwillingness on the part of the University of Lethbridge to help B’nai B’rith destroy Dr. Hall’s career is due to the university’s professed commitment to liberal education and liberal values, even if Farber does portray Lethbridge as a racist backwater in conservative Alberta, where Hall is said to have “found a comfortable home amongst Holocaust deniers.”

I would like to believe that the unwillingness of the University of Lethbridge to help B’nai B’rith destroy Dr. Hall’s career is due to the fact that, as a nation, Canada has shown itself willing to reconsider history when there is good cause. Notably, Canadians have recently begun the hard process of re-evaluating our own history with respect to our nation’s cultural and physical genocide against our Indigenous peoples. Canada’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission on Indian Residential Schools has just published a six-volume final report on its findings, and in the tradition of scholars like Dr. Hall, this report shows fearlessness in confronting past lies so that history can better reflect the truth, however uncomfortable that truth may be.

I would like to believe that the unwillingness of the University of Lethbridge to help B’nai B’rith destroy Dr. Hall’s career is due to the university’s high ideals and Canadian bearing, but when I contacted Dr. Hall, he informed me that the University of Lethbridge has indeed asked him to step down from his tenured position after twenty-six years as a professor. It seems that the university is ready to bow to outside pressure and to sacrifice Dr. Hall. I’m sure that Farber’s biased account of the anti-Semitic posting on Dr. Hall’s Facebook page did little to help Dr. Hall’s chances of staving off B’nai B’rith’s attack.

Farber’s misrepresentation of Dr. Hall is no less offensive than the crime of which Dr. Hall is accused, namely misrepresentation of the Jewish holocaust. The difference between the two is that, in the case of Farber, his accusation that Dr. Hall is an anti-Semite is clearly baseless, whereas Dr. Hall’s willingness “to reassess a lot of ideas” about the history of the Second World War seems to be well thought out given his reputation as a respected historian.


rafiq

DENY THE LIE! – JUSTIN TRUDEAU & LIBERAL GOVT. ARE TRUTH-DENIERS By Arthur Topham

denytheliefinal

DENY THE  LIE! – JUSTIN TRUDEAU & LIBERAL GOVT. ARE TRUTH-DENIERS  

By Arthur  Topham

The Liberal Party of Canada under their new rookie Prime Minister Justin Trudeau are guilty of outright lying to the people of Canada about the alleged “6 Million Jews” who were supposed to have been “gassed” and “burnt” in German work camps during World War II.

Like clock-work the Prime  Minister’s Office (PMO) spits out announcements over and over stating that the “Nazis” murdered “millions” of “Jews” between 1939 – 1945. This is wilfully done by Justin Trudeau’s ‘advisors’ (i.e., read Zionist Jew handlers) who are firmly in control of both him and his party.

The latest repetition of this lie came forth from the PMO’s office yesterday, Wednesday, September 21, 2016. It reads:

Prime Minister of Canada welcomes progress on National Holocaust Monument

September 21, 2016
Ottawa, Ontario

The Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau, today participated in a site dedication ceremony for the National Holocaust Monument, which is being built at the corner of Wellington and Booth streets in Ottawa.

The Monument, which is scheduled to be unveiled in 2017, will honour the millions of Jews and other innocent victims who died in the Holocaust. It will also promote a better understanding of the historical events surrounding the Holocaust and how they affected Canada, and celebrate the tremendous contributions that Holocaust survivors have made to this country.

Quote

“It is important for Canadians and the rest of the world to remember the suffering and murder of millions of Jews and others in the Holocaust. We must never forget the stories of the victims, and the important lessons of the Holocaust. As Canadians and citizens of the world, we must fight the hatred and fear that once fuelled these deplorable acts, and ensure that tolerance and pluralism always triumph over anti-Semitism and racism. We must also pay tribute to the resilience of those who survived that horrific ordeal and went on to make enormous contributions here in Canada as well as many other countries around the world.”
—The Rt. Hon. Justin Trudeau, Prime Minister of Canada

“This national monument will stand as a testament to the suffering of the millions who lost their lives and families to the Holocaust and tell the stories of those who came to Canada to build a new life. The Monument will serve as a reminder to future generations of Canadians to keep the lessons of history alive in our country’s consciousness. We must never take for granted our freedom, diversity, and deep commitment to human rights.”
The Honourable Mélanie Joly, Minister of Canadian Heritage

The question needs to asked over and over, “Why is the Liberal government emphasizing and repeatedly pushing this 6 Million Lie so much?

Is it because the Zionist lobbyists here in Canada like B’nai Brith and their USA Anti-Defamation League (ADL) counterpart the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada as well as the latest traitorous Israeli espionage agency the Centre for Israel & Jewish Affairs (CIJA), are beginning to panic because their 71 year old “6 Million” deception is now, thanks to the Internet and Social Media outlets like Facebook, so tattered and torn by the Truth that they’re frantically attempting to shore up this massive deception in any way possible?

It must be remembered that the Zionist Jew lobbyists here in Canada built their draconian “Hate Propaganda” laws, contained in Sections 318 – 320 of the Canadian Criminal Code, and now being used against Truth Revealers, on the baseless foundation of the “6 Million Jews” holocaust lie. This fact is documented in my March 29, 2014 article, Bad Moon Rising: How the Jewish Lobbies Created Canada’s “Hate Propaganda” Laws.

We’re seeing a quickening by the Jewish lobbyists in their last-ditch attempts to sustain their fraudulence and deception when it comes to the greatest lie ever told to the world. Could it be because more and more Canadians and especially German-Canadian citizens are finally standing up and speaking  out in defence of their ethnic homeland and especially in defence of Truth itself?

Monika Schaefer of Jasper, Alberta and Brian Ruhe of Vancouver, B.C. are two of the latest shining examples of German-Canadian truth revealers who’ve shown the courage of their convictions by speaking out on the net through their blogsites and their videos in order to inform Canadians and warn them against continuing to believe the Zionist-controlled mainstream media (MSM) and the Liberal government of Justin Trudeau.

There is also a concerted effort on the part of the B’nai Brith foreign lobby in Canada to destroy the livelihood and reputation of University of Lethbridge tenured Professor Anthony Hall by spreading lies on their website and in other Zionist-controlled media that are simply not true.

Could all of this be a prelude to the Liberal government possibly attempting to introduce “Holocaust Denial” laws into Canadian jurisprudence like the ones we see in occupied Germany today in order to stem the growing tide of Truth about what really happened during WWII and who the real perpetrators were?

Will Canada become the next Germany and start jailing its citizens for questioning historic events that have been created and spun throughout past history like gigantic spider webs of lies in order to keep the world in a state of perpetual ignorance?

It won’t take too long to find out given the times that we’re living in.


See the following related article dealing with my upcoming Constitutional challenge to Sec. 319(2) due to begin October 3rd in Quesnel Supreme Court.

Those wishing to help out with the additional costs of the upcoming Charter hearing can do so by going to the following website and making a donation.

gogetfunding.com/canadian-publisher-faces-jail-for-political-writings

THANK YOU!

Israeli-Canadian Thought Police Take Aim…. At Me By Prof. Tony Hall

aimingtonyfinal

Israeli-Canadian Thought Police Take Aim…. At Me
By Prof. Tony Hall
Editor-In-Chief
American Herald Tribune

Originally published here: 

http://ahtribune.com/in-depth/1210-israeli-canadian-thought-police.html

prof-hallphoto

In recent days I discovered that the Canadian branch of the Israeli-US-based Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith is reporting that I am “well known for using academic credentials to deny the Holocaust.” On August 29, Daniel Leons-Marder mirrored the Canadian B’nai Brith report under the title, Facebook Allows “Kill All Jews” Post on Wall of Canadian Professor. In an item Leons-Marder claims has been shared 11,000 times, he asserted “B’nai Brith Canada reported the image, which was ruled acceptable [by Facebook] within two hours, when it was alerted to it having been posted on the Facebook page of Canadian Academic Professor Anthony Hall, who is a holocaust denier.”

fakebengimage

The B’nai Brith’s Aug. 29 announcement starts with a bald statement that “Police have launched an investigation into an antisemitic Facebook post that was exposed by B’nai Brith Canada last Friday.” The earlier August 26 statement emphasized the role of Facebook, introducing me in the controversy as being “well known for using [my] academic credentials to deny the Holocaust and promote 9/11 conspiracy theories.”

Under the headline, “Killing Jews Is Now an Acceptable Message, Facebook Says,” the B’nai Brith announced,

“Antisemitism in all forms is rampant on social media, but this is the clearest, most obvious kind of antisemitism one could possibly create,” said Michael Mostyn, B’nai Brith CEO. “The classification of this as antisemitic cannot be challenged, and the fact that this promotes violence towards Jews is beyond dispute. Regardless, Facebook has deemed it acceptable despite its ‘community standards’ containing clear provisions against hate speech. The Jewish community deserves no less protection or respect than any other when it comes to hate speech and threats of violence.

“Every year, upon publication of our Annual Audit of Antisemitic Incidents, a contingent of detractors accuses us of saying the sky is falling, and that antisemitism does not exist in Canada,” said Amanda Hohmann, National Director of B’nai Brith’s League for Human Rights. “Content like this is proof positive that not only antisemitism of a genocidal nature exists in Canada, but the systems that are supposed to protect us from racist hate speech don’t consider hatred of Jews to be problematic.

B’nai Brith has reported the post to Lethbridge Police Services.”
The Canadian B’nai Brith’s post, together with those of others that have mirrored B’nai Brith’s announcement, constitute the first time I have seen myself described in print as a ‘holocaust denier.” What is the definition used by the thought police to decide who is or is not a “holocaust denier? Are there many holocausts or only one? Who owns the term, “holocaust?” If there are exclusive rights, how were they obtained?

In the eyes of the B’nai Brith, is a “holocaust denier” anyone who disagrees with any element, large or small, of its favored historical interpretation? Is the B’nai Brith naturally hostile to anyone that retains independent, evidence-based perspectives on some of the most fraught issues of historical interpretation in contemporary times?

What is behind the creation of the original post that set the controversy in motion? Who created it and why? Is this whole episode an engineered crisis? Is one of its purposes to fend off the criticisms of those that accuse the B’nai Brith and related Zionist agencies of claiming “the sky is falling” with their Orwellian system of Annual Audits of Antisemitic Incidents. Please see below the map published to present cartographic interpretations by the Coordination Forum for Countering Antisemitism.

As shall be explained below, the B’nai Brith has failed to perform due diligence in its handling of this matter. Its officers did not even attempt back up their provocative characterizations of me with even a shred of genuine evidence. The organization opted instead to exploit for its own political agenda the shock value inherent in the vile contents of an item allegedly posted, apparently very briefly, on my FB page. The item is said to have been posted by Glen Davidson. I did not ever see it on my FB page. I did not invite nor did I even have any knowledge of it until recently.

In its material the B’nai Brith describe the post as a “depiction of a White man assaulting an Orthodox Jew accompanied by a lengthy, violent anti-Semitic screed beside the photograph.” Here is the post, which I first saw sometime early in September as part of a smear piece published about me at “Aussie Dave’s” Israellycool.

To reiterate and to be absolutely clear, I did not post this social media item myself. I did not create it or solicit it. I do not approve of its contents. In fact I of course strongly condemn the message conveyed in both the image and the text. Due diligence demands, however, that I look further into this matter.

The B’nai Brith in Action

My initial research into the item’s content is leading me to the opinion that the image probably emerges from some sort of staged situation, one that seems to include the application of photo shop techniques. The most basic questions that must now be pressed concern the source of the atrocious text. From whence does it originate? Certainly I did not write it. Glen Davidson did not write it. Who did write it and why? Not once yet have I seen this deeper question posed by those who are exploiting the vile item to dramatize a real or concocted dispute with Facebook.

Quite possibly by design, the miniscule, densely compressed text is very difficult to read especially on small digital devices. Could this attribute be because the text was conceived not as a means of winning adherents but rather as a justification for political actions like the B’nai Brith’s current hate speech campaign highlighting my academic position at the University of Lethbridge?

I first saw the item among a number of screen shots all dedicated to “Aussie Dave’s” nomination of me as “Anti-Zionist-Not-Anti-Semite of the Day.”

I remember being particular interested in the part of the post that mentioned Ryan Bellerose, a Metis man and convert to Judaism who has recently been hired as the B’nai Brith’s new Western Canadian representative. Most of my attention zeroed in on Aussie Dave’s suggestion to his readers that they communications to the president of my University, Dr. Mike Mahon. I also took note of a screen shot of an item on U of L letterhead where Dr. Mahon responds to “JP.” Who is “JP”?

amandahohmann

I can trace one thread of this matter’s origins to a recorded telephone call I listened to a year ago. Its source was Amanda Hohmann, National Director of B’nai Brith’s League for Human Rights. In August of 2015 Ms. Hohmann telephoned the manager of a community venue in downtown Edmonton Alberta. Ms. Hohmann aim on behalf of her employer was to shut down a book promotion event. At the time Dr. Barrett along with his wife, two sons a dog and me were touring Alberta to call attention to an edited text entitled We Are Not Charlie Hebdo. Dr. Barrett edited the volume to which I had contributed an article.

The venue’s manager, Richard Awid, taped Ms. Hohmann’s intervention and subsequently played it back for me. Here is how I described this part of the episode in in an article entitled “B’nai Brith Moves to Quash Free Speech in Canada,”

Mr. Awid was somewhat dumbfounded that a small event at his community hall, “one of 100 such venues in Edmonton,” would elicit such an intense response from a very powerful organization in Toronto. He played back to me on his answering machine a recorded message he received at about 9 am on August 12 from Amanda Hohmann. Ms. Hohmann explained that she had received “a few complaints” about “Mr.” Kevin Barrett on the B’nai Brith’s “anti-hate hotline.” (1-416-633-6224; 1-800-892-2624)

Ms. Hohmann asserted that

“Mr. Barrett is a known anti-semite conspiracy theorist, a Holocaust Denier, and 9/11 Denier and all sorts of other things.”

Ms. Hohmann made no effort whatsoever to give background proof of her allegations or to identify the sources of the supposed “complaints.” Nevertheless she proposed to Mr. Awid that he should “cancel the event and let Mr. Barrett know he is not welcome in Edmonton.”

In this telephone call the B’nai Brith’s “human rights” director tried to defame a colleague offering absolutely no proof whatsoever to provide evidentiary backing for her directive from Toronto that Dr. Barrett should not be welcome in Alberta’s capital. I believe the Western world currently supports many Amanda Hohmanns paid very well to target and slander regularly individuals like Dr. Kevin Barrett.

Are the protagonists in these ugly witch hunts ever held accountable for the excesses? Are there any constraints on the increasingly severe incursions of the Zionist thought police? What remedies are or are not available for the likes of Dr. Barrett who is a Muslim man. Along with the rest of the omma, Dr. Barrett and his family are regularly subjected to heavy does of “hate speech” and sometimes worse?

When Richard Awid, a Muslim himself, did not adhere to Ms. Hohmann’s instructions, the B’nai Brith was able to send in a representative of the “hate speech” unit of the Edmonton police. The officer monitored the first part of the event and then left after informing Dr. Barrett that our presentation was not to be deemed hate speech by the police force he represented. I recall wondering at the time, does that bizarre episode foreshadow an era when all university classes will be policed by officials answerable to agencies like the B’nai Brith? Is that where this is leading?

The B’nai Brith has been front and center in Canada’s increasingly notorious record of aggressively policing citizens for supposed thought crimes and speech crimes. The B’nai Brith’s assault on free speech in Canada includes among its objects for criminalization Doug Collins, Malcolm Ross, Jim Keegstra, Ernst Zundel, Terry Tremaine, David Ahenakew and, most recently, Arthur Topham.

screen-shot-2015-11-12-at-11-27-58-pm-640x369

The case against Arthur Topham and his Radical Press is still ongoing. By following at a distance the tawdry prosecution of the self-employed reporter, publisher, editor and carpenter in Quesnel British Columbia, I was made aware of a very significant text published in 1941. Theodore Kaufman’s Germany Must Perish! outlines an extremely ruthless strategy of genocidal destruction of a whole people. Has this classic description of genocidal intent and methodology been ever given prominence in a school curriculum in Canada?

germanymustperishmed

germanymustperishbackmed

My reading of an Internet copy of the text, one that became integral to the proceedings of the Topham trial, caused me to reflect on how one-sided the whole discourse on genocide is becoming. The suffering of one group is highlighted and elevated above all others while the suffering and assaults imposed on other groups is often downplayed, ignored or even denigrated. I had no idea before the B’nai Brith-instigated prosecution of Arthur Topham that there was such a detailed plan to annihilate the entire German people.

I only recently have become fully aware of the extent of the murder, rape and pillage of several millions of Germans after 1945 in American prisoner war camps and in orgies of Soviet-instigated ethnic cleansing in Eastern Europe. Where are the museums to promote public education about these crimes against humanity? Where is the museum to commemorate the horrendous intergenerational genocide of perhaps a hundred million Indigenous peoples in the Holocaust of the Americas since 1492? Will future You Tubers make videos to ask elderly members of today’s generation what they did or didn’t do about the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians now underway in order to clear the way for Greater Israel?

Thought Police Wreaking Havoc on Campus

The B’nai Brith is becoming especially aggressive in campaigns to have individuals fired from their work for expounding historical interpretations it does not like. The B’nai Brith boasted menacingly on September 15 of having destroyed the career of Nikolas Balakas, a long-serving lab technician at York University’s Department of Astronomy and Physics. The announcement that Canada’s most ruthless thought police agency had succeeded in its campaign to get York University to fire its employee was written by Aidan Fishman. Mr. Fishman is Campus Advocacy Coordinator of B’nai Brith Canada.

After counting coup on Mr. Balaras’s dismissal, Mr. Fishman concludes with the following plea that the University of Lethbridge should follow York University’s example. The B’nai Brith official wrote,

 

“Unfortunately not every administration is prepared to act with such decisiveness [as that of York University], as the ongoing saga surrounding Professor Anthony Hall at Lethbridge University shows. I hope that the administration in Lethbridge can use the excellent example set by York University on this matter, and take appropriate steps to ensure that their students are not similarly subjected to hatred and antisemitism on campus.”

Who is the real author of this “ongoing saga?” Where is the proof as of today that University of Lethbridge students are being subjected “to hatred and anti-Semitism on campus.” I have not once seen this kind of language appear in 26 years of teaching evaluations. Where is there any accountability for floating this kind of vicious agenda of smear? The intrusion into this matter of a B’nai Brith official described as Campus Advocacy Coordinator is, as far as I know, setting precedents at my school. What is the nature of the “advocacy” Mr. Fishman is “coordinating”?

The effort of B’nai Brith’s “campus coordinator” and possibly others of his group to inject themselves into the internal governance of the University of Lethbridge brings to mind a similar controversy brewing at Oberlin College. Oberlin College is a renowned Liberal Arts school in Ohio whose origins long predate the American Civil War. There Dr. Joy Karega has been suspended with pay from her teaching position as a result of a controversy also involving Facebook posts. I have written a lengthy open latter on the matter to Oberlin President, Dr. Marvin Krislov. The text, which has been mirrored on other web sites, was first published at the American Herald Tribune.

In my effort to reach out to President Krislov, Dr. Karega and the other students and faculty involved in what has definitely become a fiasco for the Oberlin community, I proposed in my open letter that we all work together to mount a joint academic conference. I proposed that my own Liberal Education program at the University of Lethbridge ally itself with the embattled Liberal Arts College in Ohio to organize an event aimed at bringing thoughtful academic commentary to address a mounting crisis in higher education in North America.

I hereby invite Aiden Fishman to join this initiative and thereby embark on a constructive course rather than the trajectory of negativity implicit in his present preoccupation with hate talk and advocacy for division. Of course Mr. Fishman is far from alone in the type of “advocacy” in which he is engaged. There is a barrage of interventions currently underway from organizations like the AMCHA Initiative, the Simon Wiesenthal Center for Campus Outreach, Hillel, the American Jewish Congress, David Horowitz’s FrontPage and Daniel Pipes’ Campus Watch to mention only a few. As currently on full public display at Oberlin College, these well-funded and deeply staffed interventions invariably wreak havoc on the principles of academic freedom and civil academic discourse on campus?
I suggested the following title for the event.

Anti-Semitic Conspiracy Theories:
A Rational or Irrational Phrase in Academic Discourse?

In my research research into the Joy Karega/Oberlin debacle I became aware of the concerted campaign in 2014 to destroy the career of Prof. William I. Robinson. Dr. Robinson is Professor of Sociology at the University of California at Santa Barbara. Like Dr. Joy Karega, Dr. Steven Salaita, Dr. Hatem Bazian, Dr. Rabab Abdulhadi, Dr. Richard Falk, me and many others, Dr. Robinson includes in the curriculum some focus on the plight of Palestinian people.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MmJFqmMvOYM

 

Caption: Prof. Richard Falk, Former UN Rapporteur and Princeton University Professor of International Law, Speaks on the Issue of Academic Freedom at the University of California at Santa Barbara
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IesTlj0F98c

The sociologist refused to back down from incorporating in his teaching critical perspectives on the harsh treatment of Palestinians especially in Gaza and the so-called Occupied Territories. Amidst proliferating Jewish settlements and the constant repressions of the Israeli police state, many Palestinians continue to eke out marginal existences on the heavily militarized lands set aside for them by the United Nations in Resolution 181. Resolution 181, an international instrument calling for partition of Palestine and UN trusteeship over Jerusalem, constitutes the primary law at the roots of the Israeli entity in its present form.

Prof. Robinson has written of his ordeal in August of 2014 on Truthout. In an article entitled “Repression Escalates on US Campuses,” the sociologist explains,

“The persecution to which I was subjected involved a litany of harassment, slander, defamation of character and all kinds of threats against the university by outside forces if I was not dismissed, as well as hate mail and death threats from unknown sources. More insidiously, it involved a shameful collaboration between a number of university officials and outside forces from the Israel lobby as the university administration stood by silently, making a mockery of academic freedom.
The disciplinary procedure initiated against me by UCSB officials involved a host of irregularities, violations of the university’s own procedures, breaches of confidentiality, denial of due process, conflicts of interest, failure of disclosure, improper political surveillance, abuses of power and position, unwarranted interference in curriculum and teaching and so on. As I would discover during the course of the ordeal, individuals inside the university and in positions of authority had linked up with agents of the lobby outside the university in setting out to prosecute me.”

Will the same toolbox of wrecking instruments deployed at the University of California be shipped in from the United States and unpacked at the University of Lethbridge in Alberta Canada? Will the administration of my own school continue to uphold the University of Lethbridge’s good reputation as an institution of higher education where the vital principles of academic freedom and civil academic discourse are expressed and defended?

On several occasions I have publicly lauded the U of L for creating an environment of academic freedom. I made this observation, for instance, at the University of Lethbridge’s book event when in 2011 my volume, Earth into Property, was launched. In this 900+ page peer-reviewed academic text published by McGill-Queen’s University Press, I incorporate analysis that the B’nai Brith flippantly trivializes as “9/11 conspiracy theories.”

Deeply corrupt agencies like the B’nai Brith have a lot to lose when the basic facts about what really happened on 9/11–who did what to whom—become the common knowledge of the general public. That day may be approaching far faster than those hiding behind the tired old memes about “conspiracy theories” anticipate.

How much longer can the evidence of 9/11 be concealed behind the ruthless kind of ad hominem attacks that have become the well known-specialty of the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith in all its many constituent parts? How much longer will the public tolerate the hate propaganda and professional assaults that are obliterating the fundamental integrity of so many of our most important institutions?

What other lies and deceptions are being fed to the public on a regular basis? What is the level of public confidence these days in the trustworthiness of society’s key institutions including government, media, police and agencies of higher education? Who can say public confidence in these entities is high?

What is the appropriate role for universities in addressing issues of officialdom’s fraud and malfeasance especially in situations that have large implications for public policy? If even tenured university faculty can be intimidated into shying away from the professional responsibility to distinguish truth from falsehood, but especially in situations that threaten power’s imperatives, who will perform this vital function? Politicians? Talking heads on TV? Who will speak truth to the unaccountable power that the B’nai Brith in its current reckless demeanor so abundantly epitomizes?

Ritual Defamation in the Social Media Circus

To return to the Facebook post that lies at the root of this controversy, I have already publicly condemned the contents of the offending item in the September 16 edition of False Flag Weekly News. I currently co-host this regular broadcast along with one of its founding partners, Dr. Kevin Barrett.

I noticed a reference to my public condemnation of the item in question in the comments section of the B’nai Brith’s own web post of August 29. A commenter going by the name of Andrew Blair observes,

It is important to realize that Professor Hall publicly condemns that image and text. Go to False Flag Weekly, http://noliesradio.org/archives/119976, at minute 36, to see and hear his denunciation. When I put on my “fairness” glasses and look at that image I see Tony Hall in the headlock, and the arms locking his head are the image and the text. Does anyone else see that, or are my “fairness” glasses defective?

“Andrew Blair’s” question certainly resonates with me. The B’nai Brith’s description of the image in its news announcements refers to “a White man assaulting an Orthodox Jew.” Is the Orthodox Jew not a White man too? What is there to say that the aggressor in this image is not Cherokee or Mohawk or Palestinian for that matter?

What are the politics of the B’nai Brith’s choice of words in its racialized approach to its public announcement highlighting this inflammatory image? What effect is being sought? Did the image emerge from a real or staged situation? If it was the former, what was the event? Where did it happen? Who took the photograph? Have the investigators in the B’nai Brith-police-hate-crime-complex explored such matters.

Is the B’nai Brith’s emphasis on “police investigations” itself a staged tactic of sorts? Is it meant to dramatize the main story line aimed ultimately at seizing control of strategic instruments of Internet communication. The subplot, which is certainly intended to harm me personally and professionally, is that crazed and genocidal anti-Semitic conspiracy theorists– even “holocaust deniers”— are running around loose with full Internet access even in Lethbridge Alberta?

My own best best assessment is that the offending social media item seems likely to have been produced by photo shop juxtapositions of different images. The “White man’s” head and the “Orthodox Jew’s” crushed glasses both look like inserts. The white wing of the victim’s crushed and displaced glasses seems to have been drawn in. There are signs of graphic tinkering in the relationship between the huge muscular arm in the forefront and the squeezed face of the suffering victim.

The reversal of Talmudic-style contempt for the Other (the Goy) cries out the pictured message of Jewish victimhood. The provocative power of the image is reinforced by the B’nai Brith’s very racialized description. In my recent research I have discovered that this image and others images very much like—images that often feature the same racist “White man”— show up in on many Internet posts, even one I found translated into German.

Where the picture provides the main message, the text provides the “evidence” of the antisemitism that the B’nai Brith and its allied agencies are simultaneously engaged in inventing, cultivating, spotlighting and publicly combating. What justification would there be for the existence of the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith without the métier of antisemitism? The primary essence of the B’nai B’rith entities is to advance the agendas of the Israeli entity in the Diaspora, in other words in Canada, USA, Britain, France. Australia, and many other countries.

The text in the offending item is perhaps the most appalling excerpt of gutter prose I have ever seen. Its contents are so reprehensible that they demand careful consideration. Like an illegal drug planted by corrupt police on a targeted individual, the reprehensible social media item has been metaphorically put on my digital front door step and then advertised by the B’nai Brith to advance its own political agenda. I am left with little alternative but to respond as decently and as conscientiously to a crime in progress.

The author, it is claimed by the item’s creator, is Ben “Tel Aviv Terror” Garrison. This Garrison person has many nicknames. He is made to exclaim,

“There was never a Holocaust, but there should have been and, rest assured, there WILL be, as you serpentine kikes richly deserve one. I will not rest until every single filthy. Parasitic kike is rounded up and slaughtered like the vermin they are. The White man has had more than enough of International Jewry and we are fully prepared to smite the parasite for the millionth time. The greedy, hook nosed kikes know that there days are numbered and, unlike in the past, they now have nowhere to run. This time, there will be no kikes left alive to spead around the planet like cockroaches. We will get them ALL into the oven and their putrid memory will finally be erased from the planet once and for all. Like all parasites the Jew will continue to reproduce until every last one has been wiped out. This is why it is crucial that all kikes are ruthlessly and mercilessly butchered for the good of us all. KILL ALL JEWS NOW! EVERY LAST ONE!” Ben “Tel Aviv Terror” Garrison

What kind of demented mind would come up with such a macabre celebration of envisaged mass murder? What would be the motivation to pen such a blatant incitement to hate and slaughter of a specific people?

My research into the offending item’s origins quickly led me to the many Internet profiles and posts of Ben Garrison. Ben Garrison is apparently a real person who lives in Montana. It turns out that this Ben Garrison, the sole named individual in the miniature text of the offending Facebook post, is also the aggressor in the photo shopped image. Adorned with dark glasses and a cowboy hat, Garrison is pictured as (in the words of B’nai Brith) as “the White man assaulting an Orthodox Jew.”

Ben Garrison

The real life Ben Garrison is often described as a libertarian political satirist. He is a prolific cartoonist whose cartoon and personal images lie at the center of an increasingly contentious media circus. Significantly Facebook figures centrally in the many-faceted narrative of Ben Garrison. Perhaps his Facebook connection is a major reason why B’nai Brith and related agencies chose Garrison’s Internet personae as poster boy for its hate speech campaign of fund raising and ritual defamation.

Holocaust Studies experts at Tel-Aviv University are among the most outspoken proponents of the view that Ben Garrison is indeed the kind of bigoted psychopath who would in real life utter provocations to the genocide of Jews. These Israeli academicians would probably argue it is entirely in character for Ben Garrison to have actually have declared with sincerity, “Kill All Jews.” The hypothesis that Ben Garrison’s racist screed should be taken at face value is implicit in the wording and headlines of the posts by B’nai Brith, Daniel Leons-Marder’s Everyday Antisemitism and the Coordination Forum for Countering Antisemitism.

The smear campaign’s architects and engineers are attempting a controlled demolition of my reputation in their quest to harness Facebook more fully to their own agendas. These architects and engineers count among their allies the creators and authors at Encyclopedia dramatica. Of Ben Garrison the encyclopedia’s drama experts report, “Scholars from Tel-Aviv University’s Center for Holocaust Studies have ominously described him [Ben Garrison] as the most racist man in the universe, and the biggest existential threat to the Jews since Hitler.”

This characterization runs counter to the dominant view that Garrison is “the Internet’s most trolled cartoonist.” According to a Breitbart article entitled “Ben Garrison: How the Internet Made a Fake White Supremacist

Montana-based artist Ben Garrison isn’t a violent Neo-Nazi, or even a white nationalist. He’s a polite, accomplished cartoonist, with no history of overt or covert racism. His true political leanings are libertarian, anti-elitist, and anti-globalist. Garrison is, in fact, the victim of one the most extraordinary and longest-running smear campaigns on the internet.

For a mixture of amusement and spite, in a trolling spree that has lasted over six years, thousands of online pranksters and real neo-Nazis have been remixing his cartoons into racist caricatures. Most Ben Garrison cartoons attack the government, corporations, and political movements.

However, almost immediately after one is published, it is remixed into a new version that attacks Jews, African-Americans, or other minorities. These are rapidly disseminated in troll communities and sometimes become more widely-shared than the originals.

If Breitbart has it right and Tel-Aviv’s Center for Holocaust Studies has it wrong, then the real Ben Garrison could not have written the disgusting text that goes along with the offensive image of the cartoonist putting his victim in a headlock. If Ben Garrison is not to be understood as the kind of person who could have come up with the wording replicated and publicized by Amanda Hohmann, Daniel Leons-Marder, and B’nai Brith’s CEO, Michael Mostyn, then these individuals are involved in a telling case of false flag deception.

Given the nature of their dubious employment in what Norman Finkelstein has labeled the “Holocaust Industry,” I find it difficult to believe that these individuals as well as their bosses, underlings and associates were not aware of the controversy swirling around Ben Garrison. After all, I was able to discovered the basic outlines of the Garrison controversy in a few google searches after viewing the posts featuring Mostyn’s, Hohmann’s and Leons-Marder’s comments. Is this group merely incompetent? Are are its members part of a concerted agenda to change the public policies of many agencies, including those of the Canadian government, Facebook and the University of Lethbridge, through calculated misrepresentations, frauds and incitements?

In an Internet post entitled “Ben Garrison on Trolls” the Montana cartoonist is said to speak for himself. Interestingly, Garrison’s observations begin with his reference to the very same Facebook reference to “community standards” that supposedly initiated the B’nai Brith’s slander of me.
“This page wasn’t removed. We reviewed the page you reported for harassment. Since it did not violate our community standards, we did not remove it. Thanks for your report.”

This is the message [writes Ben Garrison] I received after reporting a hate page on Facebook. Near the top of the hate page was a statement that encouraged the extermination of all Jews. Along with that statement was a photo of my face and the name Ben Garrison. Trolls had stolen my artwork and photos from my blog, my cartoon site as well as my fine art site and had concocted an entire page devoted to spewing libelous hate. The troll entity called the page ‘Ben Garrison Cartoons—the Official Site.’  The trolls had stamped the name ‘Ben Garrison’ onto as many hateful images as possible throughout the page. How does one stop such blatant libel? Where do these trolls come from? Is it even possible to track them down? Why do they do such terrible things? Why me?
As I found out, it’s not just me. Many others have suffered the same outrageous indignity. It appears that trolls are no longer content merely talk to each other on sordid sites such as ‘4chan’ or ‘Stormfront.’ They want to go mainstream.  Therefore, social media are a natural target for them. Do they really believe the vitriolic memes they are shoveling, or are they merely playing an elaborate prank? It doesn’t matter. Their memes of hate must not go mainstream. Facebook must wake up and block the hate before it gets established. Hate speech is not free speech. Hate speech is blind, one-dimensional blackness. It is not reasoned debate.  It loudly shouts for the murder of human beings and Facebook is providing them a megaphone for that purpose.

In my view the largest weight of available evidence points to the conclusion that Ben Garrison did not write the “Kill All Jews” commentary. If Ben Garrison did not write the planted text, then who did?

Could the B’nai Brith’s highlighted social media item have been produced by a Zionist group, agency or individual? Why might partisans of Israel do such a thing? Could it be to provide the ammunition for smear campaigns directed against individuals and groups that criticize Israel? Could it be to create incidents to justify appeals for money such as those accompanying the B’nai Brith’s slanderous posts aimed at damaging the reputation of the University of Lethbridge and my tenured academic role in it as a 26-year member of the Arts and Science Faculty?

Worse, much worse, can be envisaged. Could it be that the production and planting of the of the Ben Garrison post as well as others like it might be deployed to provide “evidence” in thought crime and speech crime litigation, the ultimate specialty and raison d’etre of the B’nai Brith? It is easy to imagine how such an outlandish and extravagant expression of hostility as that said to come from Garrison could be rendered useful to Crown prosecutors serving the Zionist masters.

Regardless of its source, there is no doubt that the Ben Garrison post could conceivably be exploited as a tailor made item to assist Crown prosecutors serving the agenda of B’nai Brith and related agencies. Such an item could definitely be deployed in a litigious assault on designated targets in order to establish webs of connection linking alleged hate speech with genocidal intent as well as the semantic nuke in the Zionist arsenal of weaponized words.

The conspiracy to advance the public perception that the engineered phrase, “holocaust denial,” has any internal and external coherence as an outlawed category of forbidden thought and speech runs absolutely contrary to the intellectual viability of the academy as well as the health of society more generally. The basic premise of the world’s most fraught term creates a false dichotomy that is coming to epitomize the decline of evidence-based rationality beneath the ascent of a new kind of orthodoxy combining both religious and secular elements.

Those that want to entrench and enforce an outlawed realm of forbidden thought and articulation brandish the weaponized term like an ideological sniper on steroids. They have no interest in providing definitions of where orthodoxy ends and where denial begins. As I am discovering by raising even a simple call for “open debate” on the main platform of Zionism’s unaccountable power, there are harsh new authoritarian forces that need to be called to account if we are even to slow down the police state incursions in our post-911 world.

The new configurations of authority are extending to important agencies like the Royal Canadian Legion, Jasper National Park, and the Alberta Society of Fiddlers. Those overseeing these important institutions are made to feel empowered to impose arbitrary sanctions and punishments against an individual who dared to question enshrined orthodoxy.

The message is made clear that the vibrance of art and culture, the wellbeing of veterans as well as the need to protect some of Alberta’s most majestic Alpine environments have become secondary commitments. The treatment in Jasper National Park of violinist Monika Schaefer signals the end of our free and democratic society. Our right and need to express independent thought, the starting point of collective self-determination, has has been sacrificed in order to enforce supine obedience to the sanctification of an historical interpretation that must not be held subjected to sceptical scrutiny and reconsideration.

How many are now being held, including some Canadians, in dark European dungeons for questioning any aspect of the unrelenting vilification of Germany as home of the most the most evil society of monsters ever to walk the face of the earth? Will we ever be able to liberate ourselves from the spell that is causing us to become so blind and unresponsive to the holocausts we ourselves are imposing on the natural world and also on the besieged worldwide community of our Muslim brothers and sisters?

What are the chances that the nuclear holocaust currently being promoted by our governors can be held back when those most intent on making war not peace are so firmly in charge? Is there a connection between the decline of the anti-war movement and the rise of the militarized police state currently deploying false flag-induced fears to constrain our ability to think, speak and act in conformity with the imperatives of survival? What we most require at this moment is simple affirmations of life’s beauty and integrity. Instead we are delivered coercive dictates demanding we deny what we our reason and research tells us to be true.

How did we the academics, but especially we the historians, allow it to happen that a whole category of the European past has been declared off bounds to unfettered discussion and critical investigative scholarship? By allowing this development to proceed, a very sweeping and consequential precedent is being set.

How did we the citizens allow the principle to develop that government can declare that whole subject areas of research and publication to have been so perfectly interpreted, so correctly dealt with in every detail, that no revision and modification of existing conclusions can be allowed. What is the role of the Anti-Defamation League of the B’nai B’rith in enforcing the ruthless bulldozing aside of the most basic foundations of freedom of thought, freedom of speech, freedom of assembly and adherence to rigorous standards of scientific inquiry.

The B’nai Brith and Ben Garrison, the poster boy for the Zionist organization’s hate speech campaign, are exactly on the same page when it comes to Facebook. Both Ben Garrison and the B’nai Brith seek to constrain free speech on the Internet more tightly. Is this convergence of agendas a coincidence or are more calculated deceptions at play here? To publicize his desire that Facebook be more proactive in censoring the Internet, Garrison produced the following cartoon:

Facebook and Israel; Ben Garrison and the B’nai Brith

My FFWN co-host, Dr. Kevin Barrett, has evaluated the evidence surrounding the Garrison post and concluded it was “very likely produced by B’nai Brith itself, or other Zionist extremists of like mind, as a PR operation. No wonder they are “monitoring” the police to make sure they behave themselves.”

Presenting his own version of the B’nai Brith’s highlighted image, Dr. Barrett continues,

The absurd rant with its lurid references to “greedy hook-nosed kikes” and so on does not pass the smell test. Whoever created this image obviously did not do so with the intention of convincing the public to take action against Jews and/or Zionists. On the contrary, it appears to have been designed for the opposite purpose: To convince the public that crazed, foul-mouthed, murderous anti-Semites are a clear and present danger.

Virtually every time a swastika is spray painted on a synagogue, the culprit turns out to be a “self-hating” Jewish Zionist trying to conjure up the specter of an “anti-Semitic threat.” Would an investigation of the provenance of this image find something similar?

Dr. Barrett observes that “the manufactured incident smearing Tony Hall may be part of a coordinated program, orchestrated from Tel Aviv, to try to stop the rise of the ever-increasing virtual army of pro-Palestine social media users.

As highlighted in Telesur, the government of Israel and Facebook have been represented at the highest level in a series of meetings aimed at conspiring to hold back the growing flood of social media posts subjecting Israel’s maltreatment of the Palestinians to sceptical public scrutiny.

This recent development well demonstrates the specious nature of B’nai Brith’s characterization of Facebook as some kind of rogue agency unwilling to act immediately to pre-empt an existential threat emanating from Lethbridge. More likely the B’nai Brith’s alarmist posts in late August of 2016 were, in part at least, a ploy to divert attention from the reality that social media, but especially Facebook, is more and more being harnessed to Zionist goals and agendas.

Was the B’nai Brith’s deployment of the racist side of Ben Garrison’s dual public personae calculated to serve the double purpose of both smearing me and my school as well as leading interested parties to a surprising “libertarian” voice for the suppression of Internet freedom? What should be done about Internet trolls such as those at the B’nai Brith that have shown themselves to be unrelenting in planting lies and innuendo with the aim of silencing criticism of Israel?

—-

Traitorous Zionist Jew Foreign Lobby B’nai Brith Destroy Yet Another Canadian Truth Revealer’s Employment

Traitorous Zionist Jew Foreign Lobby B’nai Brith Destroy Yet Another Canadian Truth Revealer 

http://www.bnaibrith.ca/b_nai_brith_complaint_leads_to_dismissal_of_york_university_staff_member
B’nai Brith Complaint Leads to Dismissal of York University Staff Member
September 15, 2016

nikolaosbalaskasnewgraphic

By Aidan Fishman
Campus Advocacy Coordinator
B’nai Brith Canada

York University has dismissed an employee following an investigation into his antisemitic social media use.

Nikolaos Balaskas, a long-time lab technician in York’s Department of Astronomy and Physics, was the subject of a B’nai Brith Canada complaint to the university’s administration on Aug. 22.

CIJNews reported Wednesday afternoon that a letter was sent to Balaskas by his employer and shared by Balaskas with his friends on Facebook,  noting that his “employment is terminated with cause effective immediately.” Specifically, it states that the content of Balaskas’ social media use “do not comply with York University policies, procedures, standards and values.”

Facebook posts by Balaskas contained material that denied the Holocaust, described a Nazi war criminal as a “hero,” and described Zionists as “servants of the Evil One” seeking to bring a “holocaust” upon the world.

amandahohmann

“This is a very positive step, coming from a university where there have been ongoing, and very public, issues of antisemitism,” said Amanda Hohmann, National Director of B’nai Brith’s League for Human Rights. “It is incredibly heartening to see that the administration, in this case, not only took the allegations seriously but took real action to correct the problem.

“Unfortunately not every administration is prepared to act with such decisiveness, as the ongoing saga surrounding Professor Anthony Hall at Lethbridge University shows. I hope that the administration in Lethbridge can use the excellent example set by York University on this matter, and take appropriate steps to ensure that their students are not similarly subjected to hatred and antisemitism on campus.”

—–

B’NAI BRITH: #1 ENEMY OF FREE SPEECH IN CANADA By RadicalPress.com

1enemy

HELP DEFEAT THE UNJUST, ORWELLIAN, ZIONIST “HATE PROPAGANDA” LAWS IN CANADA!

PLEASE DONATE AND SUPPORT ARTHUR TOPHAM’S CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGE TO

SEC. 319(2) OF CANADA’S CRIMINAL CODE

gogetfunding.com/canadian-publisher-faces-jail-for-political-writings

SUPPORTFREEDOMOFSPEECHNew

gogetfunding.com/canadian-publisher-faces-jail-for-political-writings

THANK YOU!

Arthur Topham
Pub/Ed
The Radical Press
Canada’s Radical News Network
“Digging to the root of the issues since 1998”

Holocaust deniers threaten Green Party credibility by Toronto Sun

Toronto Sun logo

Screen Shot 2016-08-03 at 7.10.27 AM

[***Editor’s Note: Graphics in article compliments of Radical Press]

Holocaust deniers threaten Green Party credibility

By Sue-Ann Levy, Toronto Sun
August 02, 2016

She was a member of the Green Party of Canada when it was founded in 1983 and ran in four elections as a party candidate.

Monika Schaefer, who stood for election provincially in 2004 and federally in 2006, 2008 and 2011, came to the party’s attention in mid-June when she posted a video on YouTube flatly denying the Holocaust.

According to the Jasper resident, who shot the video in Germany, the Holocaust is “the biggest and most pernicious lie in all of history” and there were “no gas chambers there (in Germany or elsewhere)… the only gas used was to get rid of lice.”

MonikaSchaeferSorryMomHdr copy

It appears the Green Party had egg on its face, not just because this woman was a candidate several times over, but because Green Party leader — and the party’s only sitting MP — Elizabeth May didn’t seem to know whether she was still a member, or not, when leading Canadian Jewish groups exposed Schaefer last month.

MayShocked

Reached in Jasper Tuesday, Schaefer said she rescinded her membership a year ago “on a matter of principle” — namely because May distanced herself from a petition seeking an investigation into the events of 9/11.

MonikaSchaeferPhoto

She accused May of “making political hay” out of her video — an affront considering she was a “loyal” Green Party member and candidate and shared her views “widely” with many Green Party members.

“She is bowing to her political masters … The Zionist lobby,” said Schaefer, whose candidacy was rejected in 2014.

Martin Sampson, spokesman for the Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs, says the Green Party is “particularly susceptible to infiltration” by Holocaust deniers and 9/11 Truthers.

CIJABomb copy 2

“In order to remain credible, the Green Party must stop people who hold these abhorrent views from hijacking the party, distracting it from its mission and relegating it to the margins,” he said.

No kidding.

One has to look no further than this weekend’s annual conference in Ottawa, where two controversial anti-Israel motions — and the only foreign policy positions to be presented at all — will be debated Saturday morning (on the Jewish Sabbath.)

1_boycott-israel-campaign_2006_50_70_amer-shomali-basel-nasr1 copy 2

Those controversial motions urge Green Party members to support the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement (which attempts to restrict ties and business with the Jewish state) and to approve revoking the charitable status of the Jewish National Fund of Canada (a charity that has worked to protect the natural environment of Israel for decades).

Online voting has been so supportive that the motions have made it to the convention’s workshop sessions, where they will be debated and voted on and then sent to full membership for a vote.

Michael Mostyn, CEO of B’nai Brith, says they believe members of the Independent Jewish Voices organization are pushing these Green Party motions — a group he says has spearheaded the anti-Israel boycott movement in Canada, have sent speakers to the highly “morally reprehensible” anti-Semitic Al Quds day rallies and “pretends” to speak for the majority of Jews in Canada, when in fact they do not.

CanadaBBLOBBY3 copy 5

Green Party spokesman Dan Palmer said May has previously indicated publicly that she opposes both motions and that she is just one vote at the convention.

“Policy proposals come from the grassroots of the party and are not vetted before being put to members,” he said Tuesday.

Mostyn said they certainly hope the anti-Israel motions do not pass this weekend and that the Green Party would not be associated with “views of this sort,” especially since the IJV organization have their paw prints all over them.

“You don’t want any political party motions that would single out groups for hatred,” he says.

He added that Schaefer’s video is “horrendous” and “extremely disturbing.”

—–

SLevy@postmedia.com

Source Article

ANOTHER B’NAI BRITH BULLSHIT HOLOHOAX STORY By Paul Fromm (CAFE)

SimpsonsHolocaust

ANOTHER B’NAI BRITH HOLOHOAX BULLSHIT STORY

By Paul Fromm (CAFE)

Free speech in Canada? The right to dissent from perceived orthodoxy? You have to be kidding?

The snoops and censors of B’nai Brith sniffed out an article in a London, Ontario Arabic magazine, Al Saraha, that questions the numbers that have now formed a doctrine of the new religion of holocaust — namely, 6-million. B’nai Brith howled. The compliant London thought police, er “hate squad”, (yes, we really have political police in Canda, never mind all the phony window dressing about the rights of freedom of speech and freedom of the press in Trudeau Sr.’s fraudulent Charter of Rights and Freedoms) hop to it and investigate. Advertizers are contacted and, being firm believers in free speech, promptly jump ship and abandon the poor Arabs.. Liberal politicians, ever sucking up to the Third World vote, suddenly find themselves embarrassed and promise to pull future advertising. Actually, it all looks good on the multicultural crowd. Don’t confuse their stated commitment to “diversity” to mean diversity of opinion.

And the pathetic publisher is left babbling that he really didn’t know what was in the article and claimed he didn’t know Hitler is alleged to have killed six million Jews. [Come on, even the most inattentive high school student has had this number drilled into his head as our education system often demeans our own European history but slavishly peddles the tribal history of a special group.] It’s a sordid story all around.

The London Free Press (July 21, 2016) reports: “Condemnation is raining down on an Arabic magazine in London after it published a column questioning the Holocaust, the Nazi murder of six million Jews during the Second World War. But while the London police hate crime unit is investigating, and a national Jewish group urged Ontario Premier Kathleen Wynne’s government — an advertiser in the publication — to distance itself from the monthly Al Saraha, its publisher says he was unaware of the facts and apologizes to Jewish people.

1297859295516_ORIGINAL

Abdul Hadi Shala the owner and GM of Al Saraha in London. (MIKE HENSEN, The London Free Press

‘I didn’t mean to reject something that happened historically,’ Abdul Haidi Shala, speaking in Arabic translated into English, told The London Free Press on Thursday.’I was curious to know why Hitler killed Jews during the Holocaust, so I read through his article and I found information,’ the publisher said. …

B’nai Brith Canada, a national Jewish human rights organization [more Zionist BS. It’s a secret, Jews-only Masonic organization created by the Rothschilds over a hundred years ago. Ed. Topham], complained about the piece in the magazine’s June-July issue, with its chief executive calling the column “despicable” and “hateful.”

While some Holocaust deniers flatly reject that Adolf Hitler and his Nazi regime in Germany ran a campaign to wipe out Europe’s Jews, complete with notorious death camps that were killing factories, others quibble over the numbers killed and the history behind it.

The piece that ran in the London monthly falls into the second category, an English translation shows, describing the six million killed as ‘a number of impossible magnitude’ and blaming ‘Jewish propaganda’ that ‘managed to spread it and establish it.’

Shala, the magazine’s owner and general manager, said he didn’t know that the facts in the piece, which he said was written by an Egyptian journalist for another publication, were incorrect.

London police confirmed hate crime investigators are reviewing the piece, whose disputed edition carried a prominent Ramadan message by Premier Kathleen Wynne and members of her governing Liberals, and a smaller ad by hometown MPP Deb Matthews, the province’s deputy premier. … London Const. Chris Loizides confirmed police are investigating whether a Criminal Code offence occurred. …

[ Ontario Liberal cabinet member Deb] Matthews issued a statement saying the Ontario Liberals were ‘completely unaware’ of the magazine’s intent to publish the piece when they bought advertising for Ramadan greetings, and condemn ‘in the strongest possible terms’ the ‘anti-Semitic and homophobic views’ in the piece. [One wonders whether Christian publication can expect Christmas greetings from the wildly pro-homosexual, anti-Christian Ontario Liberals?]

‘I assure you that our caucus and I will no longer purchase advertising space in this publication,’ she said in the statement. …

A provincially-funded London agency that helps immigrants, the London and Middlesex Local Immigration Partnership, condemned the piece Thursday and yanked the magazine from its resource list for newcomers.

[B’nai Brith CEO Michael] Mostyn called that move and a statement by the organization’s co-chair, saying it doesn’t condone racist and homophobic views, a ‘positive step.’”

And thus works thought control in politically correct Canada.

Whatever happened to a good old letter-to-the-editor to set the magazine straight. However, the apostles of the tyrannical tribal religion of holocaust do not discuss or debate. And heresy is severely punished.

If this were a matter of historical FACT, it ought to be debatable. Indeed, the number of Jews allegedly killed in WW II has fluctuated wildly. Initially, a figure of 11-million was claimed; then, it was 7-million.By the 1970s, with the creation of the new religion of holocaust, the figure of 6-million became dogma. To question it might mean prison, job loss or fines in Germany and France — a situation suggestive that we are not dealing with history here but tribal legend. After the fall of communism, documents from Auschwitz revealed that the death toll there, formerly claimed at 4-million (about 70 per Jews) was actually about a million . Applying the same 70 per cent figure, this would reduce the Jewish death toll, from all causes, by some 2-million, but,strangely, this never reduced the 6-million figure. This is a mathematical miracle unparalleled since Jesus, we are told, multiplied five small loaves of bread and two fishes to feed a multitude of 5,000.

If this were merely Jewish tribal history, the figure wouldn’t much matter. They can tell one another whatever they like. However, as the new religion of holocaust is imposed on the West, it has implications — guilt mongering, a free pass for Israel, huge reparations payments. As such, it does become of matter of concern to know or. at least, discuss and debate whether what we’re being told is the truth.

Well, not in Canada


Original story

By Hala Ghonaim, Jennifer O’Brien, The London Free Press

Authoritarian Jasper Violates the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedom by Attempting to Silence Monika Schaefer’s Violin in Canada’s Jasper National Park by Prof. Tony Hall

BIGOTSVILLE

Authoritarian Jasper Violates the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedom by Attempting to Silence Monika Schaefer’s Violin in Canada’s Jasper National Park 

by Prof. Tony Hall

Screen Shot 2015-11-17 at 10.17.57 AM

To Dave Baker,

I am dumbfounded by the decision you delivered on behalf of some unnamed authority. To Ms. Monika Schaefer you write, “We have considered your application for a busking permit in Jasper. In light of your recently publicly proclaimed non-inclusive beliefs we have decided to decline a permit to you at this time.”

Please clarify who is included in this “we” on whose behalf you claim to speak? Who takes responsibility for the decision to violate core provision of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms in the community of Canada’s Jasper National Park?

This unilateral decision extends the so-far-unaccountable decision of those in Jasper’s Canada Day Committee to silence Monika Schaefer’s violin playing last July 1st. Because some Jasperites apparently threatened to disrupt the event, presumably in response to Ms. Schaefer’s peaceful video expression, the precedent was set that Jasper is a place of censorship where freedom of expression and conscience can be subordinated when threats of violence arise.

Now comes this gross violation of fundamental principles of Canadian decency, not to mention the rule of law, as dictated by whatever authority it is on whose behalf you, Dave Baker, claim to be acting in handing down this truly reprehensible arbitration.

Canadians should know that because of the treatment by officialdom of Monika Schaefer, a very active and contributing 35-year citizen of the community you share with her, Jasper should not be considered a safe place suitable for hosting international visitors. From what I have been learning, Jasper seems to be a place where intolerance and arbitrary measures go forward founded on nothing more than the political opinion of unaccountable decision makers.

So far Monika has been dis-invited from her invited Canada Day performance. She has, as reported in The Fitzhugh, been banned from the Jasper Legion No. 31 seemingly on the unilateral say so of Ken Kuzminki. She has been refused by The Fitzhugh newspaper a right of a full response. Her censored full response to the original smear piece against her was considerably shorter than Paul Clarke’s report. Now you and those unnamed individuals for whom you claim to speak have decided to discriminate against Ms. Schaefer because of her beliefs. Characterizing her opinion as “non-inclusive” you have determined she is ineligible for a busking permits to play music in the Jasper town centre.

Your decision is exclusionary as well as discriminatory. The actions taken by you and others are thought to be “justified” on the basis of personal opinions about her video, a 6 minute item that some dislike and many more like. At last count of the 70,000 or so views, over 1400 individuals registered a “like” of the video while almost 600 voted thumbs down.

Given the way Jasper authorities are dealing with this controversy so far, should those that express “like” for the video be banned from Jasper National Park? Should entry into Jasper National Park be conditional on expressing dislike with Ms. Schaefer’s “Sorry Mom” video? Should entrants to the park have to go through screening for political correctness? Should all existing residents be subjected to a thought test like that to which Ms. Schaefer is currently being subjected?

Will the next step be to require Ms. Schaefer to wear some marker, say with a Germany-related symbol, to announce to visitors that she is the punished Jasper citizen whose ideas are so verboten that her violin playing in the streets of Jasper has been prohibited? Will all applicants for a busking permit be subjected to Internet checks to make sure everything they have published is consistent the Values and Principles Statement emanating from the Jasper Community Habitat for the Arts? To do any less would be discriminatory.

I await your indication of who is behind the decision to ban Monika’s beautiful violin playing from the streets of Jasper because she dared speak her mind on a controversial issue that should be treated with nuanced responses rather than with the authoritarian approach that you express in your terse statement to her. How many benefit events in Jasper have been graced by Monika’s legendary violin playing, now transformed into a political football to be thrown around for self-interested political advantage by Jasper’s self-appointed arbiters of community values and tastes.

Yours Sincerely,

Tony Hall
Professor of Liberal Education and Globalization Studies
University of Lethbridge

——————————————
From: Dave Baker <betabake@gmail.com>
Sent: July 23, 2016 11:55:28 AM
To: Monika Schaefer
Subject: RE: Busking Permit

 We have considered your application for a busking permit in Jasper. In light of your recently publicly proclaimed non-inclusive beliefs we have decided to decline a permit to you at this time.

 habitatvaluestatement2 (1)

Canadian Roundtable – The Trial of Arthur Topham & The Jewish Lobby in Canada by Red Ice Radio

http://www.redicecreations.com/radio/2016/02/RIR-160210.php

CanRound Final

 

Bolshevik/Zionist Hate Propaganda laws must be repealed RadicalPress.com Public Service Announcement

BolshevikHateLawsFinal

Interview with Joseph Hickey of the Ontario Civil Liberties Association by Ezra Levant on Arthur Topham’s Sec. 319(2) criminal case

ATEditorPic185

Editor’s Note: Only recently did I learn that Joseph Hickey, Director of the Ontario Civil Liberties Association (OCLA) had been interviewed by former SunNews television personality Ezra Levant on his show “The Source” after the OCLA came out in defence of my criminal charges brought forth by the actions of B’nai Brith Canada, Israel’s principal lobby group operating within our country.

Screen Shot 2015-09-26 at 10.58.56 AM

True to Zionist form Ezra Levant introduces the topic of discussion by making false, misleading pronouncements about myself (calling me “anti-Semitic” and implying that my website RadicalPress.com is guilty of publishing “Hatred” toward the Jews and then also suggests that Joseph Hickey undoubtedly would agree with him [he doesn’t]) but then moves into a discussion with Mr. Hickey about why his organization volunteered to come to my support.

Mr. Hickey’s position with respect to Canada’s so-called “Hate Speech” laws is clear and unequivocal: he doesn’t feel that such legislation is required in a free and democratic society.

Again, one other example of the Zionist media monopoly’s misfeasance and disinformation propaganda occurs in the video when Levant shows an image of the digital “book” cover that I created for my satire on Theodore Kaufman’s actual book “Germany Must Perish!” and portrays it to the viewing audience as if it were an actual book. Of course he conveniently overlooks mentioning the real book that was written by a real Jew back in 1941 and thus conveys a false image of my work and my website.

Screen Shot 2015-09-26 at 11.00.03 AM

This video is well worth viewing and sharing with others as it clearly shows how the Zionist media functions in order to suppress free expression and vilify those who exercise it but more importantly it also shows that there is a strong and growing support for the repeal of these Zionist created “hate crime” laws in the form of civil liberty associations such as the OCLA.

I wish to acknowledge Joseph Hickey’s stand on this vital issue and thank him (belatedly) for having presented his positive position in a clear and understandable fashion.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M_MxPOUzZuw&feature=youtu.be

••••  ••••

Please help out with my upcoming Sec. 319(2) “Hate Propaganda” trial in October by making a donation.

Donations can be made online via my GoGetFunding site located at http://gogetfunding.com/canadian-publisher-faces-jail-for-political-writings/ or else by sending cash, cheques or Money Orders to the following postal address. Please make sure that any cheques or Money Orders are made out to – Arthur Topham – and sent to:

Arthur Topham
4633 Barkerville Highway
Quesnel, B.C.
V2J 6T8

Canada’s B’nai Brith Moves to Outlaw Free Speech and Academic Freedom by Anthony Hall, Veterans Today

ATEditorPic185

Editor’s Note: The following article by Tony Hall is, overall, an excellent depiction of what happens to a free and democratic nation when it is surreptitiously invaded by a clandestine, foreign ideology and then its civil and legal infrastructure is perverted and diverted off course to the point where the government no longer represents the interests of the people but, instead, obeys the edicts of the foreign entity that has co-opted the nation. In this case it is the malevolent actions of Canada’s Zionist lobby organization B’nai Brith Canada which, as my readers will undoubtedly understand from many previous references throughout my own work, is the same organization that has been harassing me and intimidating me since 2007 and was directly responsible for having its agents accuse me under Sec. 319(2) of Canada’s Criminal Code of publishing and spreading “Hate Propaganda” toward Jews which led to my incarceration and the theft of my computers and electronic files in May of 2012 and since, a long and costly legal battle which will culminate this fall when a trial by judge and jury will commence in Quesnel, B.C. on October 26th, 2015.

Readers interested in the history and motives of this serpentine organization are strongly encouraged to read the following in-depth analysis of its sordid and dangerous past found at the following url http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=1410 . 

Screen Shot 2015-08-19 at 1.01.30 PM

In his article Dr. Anthony Hall refers to B’nai Brith as ” the oldest “Jewish services” organization in North America.” But this is far short of what this Jewish organization truly is when one delves into its hoary and shadowy past. What readers need to understand fully is that B’nai Brith International is a secretive, Jews-only Freemason Order that was created by the same Rothschild criminal cartel that now controls the Western world’s financial empire and was also instrumental in the creation of the false-flag entity that we all know as the “state” of Israel.

An additional article written back in January of 2008 gives yet another view as to this “service” organization’s secret agenda:

100thMonkeyHdr-copy

http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=628

As well, B’nai Brith Canada has played a crucial role in designing and implementing Canada’s “Hate Propaganda” legislation that they were successful in planting into Canadian jurisprudence after the end of World War II. 

But apart from B’nai Brith Canada there is one other serious error in Dr. Hall’s otherwise astute and truthful description of what has happened to Canada under the dictatorship of Stephen Harper and the Conservative government and that is his indirect reference to Germany during the period when it was ruled by the National Socialist government of Adolf Hitler.  In referencing the shooting incident in Ottawa on Parliament Hill on October 22, 2014 Dr. Hall states, “This event was used to justify Bill C-51, now the Anti-Terrorism Act of 2015, which Rocco Galati and others have observed replicates much of the legislation supporting the fascist governments in Germany and Italy in the 1930s.” This statement is of course pure Zionist propaganda and should not have appeared as a metaphor for what is happening in Canada today or in any other democratic nation around the world where the Zionist Jews are hard at work spreading their lies and their hate and implementing their “Hate Crime” laws in order to cover up their own misfeasance and traitorous actions. 

Using the National Socialist government of Adolf Hitler as a comparison to what’s going on today globally is, in itself, a false flag. All of what we are witnessing now is a direct result of the actions of the Zionists and have nothing whatever to do with Adolf Hitler and the German nation but are perfectly in line with the actions of the former Soviet Union and the Communist system which has followed this type of modus operandi since it first overtook the Russian Empire back in 1917. If Dr. Anthony Hall is looking for an historical connection to the events of today all he needs to do is look at the Communist system that overran Europe beginning in the former Russian Empire and then spread its evil ideology throughout North America. Rocco Galati and “others” are wrong to equate the present political machinations of the Zionist Jews with Hitler and Germany and Dr. Hall is also remiss in having referenced them in connection with the Ottawa shooting.

—-

 

vt-logo2015b

hall

Is Harper’s Hate Speech Contaminating Canada?

Canada’s B’nai Brith Moves to Outlaw Free Speech and Academic Freedom
by Anthony Hall, Veterans Today
August 18, 2015

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2015/08/18/is-harpers-hate-speech-contaminating-canada/

As Dr. Kevin Barrett has reported, our recent book tour of Western Canada culminated in an attempt by the B’nai Brith to shut down our event on August 16 at the Rossdale Community League Hall in Edmonton, Alberta. Due in large measure to the principled fortitude of the community hall’s manager, Richard Awid, the event did take place.

Screen Shot 2015-08-19 at 11.44.57 AM

The first half of the proceedings were monitored by two officers of the Edmonton Police Service’s Hate Crime Unit. The police officers may have been instructed to intervene in this way by officials of the B’nai Brith, the oldest “Jewish services” organization in North America.

The Canadian branch of the B’nai Brith is deeply intertwined with the federal government led by Prime Minister Stephen Harper whose current bid for re-election is arguably based on a steady and unrelenting stream of hate speech.

The Stephen Harper neocons are presently seeking a second majority mandate from the Canadian electorate by presenting themselves as the leaders of a anti-Muslim jihad campaign involving the Canadian Armed Forces, Canada’s heavily politicized police forces, together with the media empire of the New York-based Golden Tree Hedge Fund.

Paul Godfrey is the chief intermediary linking the Golden Tree investor group with the Zionist-dominated  Postmedia and Sun News outlets that dominate key facets of mass communications in Canada. The Postmedia newspaper chain was given its current extreme form of pro-Israel spin by former media mogul Conrad Black who initially hired Jonathan Kay.

Kay has authored a classic hate-speech diatribe including a calculated smear job directed at Dr. Barrett. Entitled Among The Truthers: A Journey into the Growing Conspiracist Underground of 9/11 Truthers, Birthers, Armageddonites, Vaccine Hysterics and Internet Addicts, Kay’s book was published by Rupert Murdoch’s media network.

Kay’s disinfo text received backing from the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies, a pro-Israel, anti-Iranian lobby group whose key membership is derived from the now notorious neocon think tank, the Project for the New American Century.

Stoking the Flames of Anti-Muslim Hatred Through Unsubstantiated Smear and Disinformation
I spoke to Richard Awid, the manager of the Rossdale Community League Hall close to the banks of the North Saskatchewan River in the capital of the oil-rich province of Alberta, now known widely as Texas North as well as Stephen Harper’s primary political base. In our conversation Mr. Awid explained to me that he is a Muslim whose Muslim ancestors arrived in Canada in 1901. Mr. Awid was somewhat dumbfounded that a small event at his community hall, “one of 100 such venues in Edmonton,” would elicit such an intense response from a very powerful organization in Toronto. He played back to me on his answering machine a recorded message he received at about 9 am on August 12 from Amanda Hohmann. Ms. Hohmann explained that she had received “a few complaints” about “Mr.” Kevin Barrett on the B’nai Brith’s “anti-hate hotline.” (1-416-633-6224; 1-800-892-2624)

Ms. Hohmann asserted that “Mr. Barrett is a known anti-semite conspiracy theorist, a Holocaust Denier, and 9/11 Denier and all sorts of other things.

Ms. Hohmann made no effort whatsoever to give background proof of her allegations or to identify the sources of the supposed “complaints.” Nevertheless she proposed to Mr. Awid that he should “cancel the event  and let Mr. Barrett know he is not welcome in Edmonton.”

Perhaps Ms. Hohman and her B’nai Brith colleagues have simply taken at face value the disinformation on Dr. Barrett published by Jonathan Kay in Among The Truthers. Apparently the B’nai Brith like Mr. Kay, one of the ghost writers of Justin Trudeau’s recent autobiography, felt it unnecessary to address the evidence of what did or did not happen on 9/11 before smearing those that have questioned various aspects of the now-thoroughly-discredited official cover story. Those that have taken the time to investigate the available evidence could rightfully conclude that the likes of Kay, Hohmann or the very unskeptical propagandist Michael Shermer, are the ones that best deserve deserve of the label, “9/11 Deniers.”

 

Screen Shot 2015-08-19 at 11.45.11 AM

On the Genesis and Current Character of Mr. Netanyahu’s Global War on Terror
Mr. Awid explained how he felt compelled by the B’nai Brith’s alarming message to do due diligence in order investigate Ms. Hohmann’s unsupported allegations. He outlined for me how he did his own Internet research and contacted the Edmonton Police Service.

In discussing his own investigations Mr. Awid made it very clear that Stephen Harper and his Defense Minister, Jason Kenney, seem to be conducting their own hate speech campaign directed against Muslims as part of their electioneering.

Mr. Awid referred to the “ignorance” of top Conservative Party of Canada officials and their blanket targeting of Muslims generically as the “enemy” or as potential enemies. The inflaming and political exploitation of Islamophobia by the Canadian government’s reigning cabal is without a doubt wreaking havoc with the relative civil harmony that once characterized Canada before the election-fraud racketeers took charge in Ottawa.

Mr. Awid might have added that, by some calculations, about 4,000,000 Muslims have died so far from the so-called Global War on Terror, a psy-op fuelled by a toxic brew of hate speech disinformation.

Mr. Awid referred to the Tervor Aaronson’s The Terror Factory: Inside the FBI’s Manufactured War on Terror. That volume demonstrates that the FBI has played a major role in manufacturing and facilitating the very terrorism it claims to have pre-empted or solved. The manipulation of unstable individuals to provide the manufactured imagery of Islamic terrorism is the federal police force’s classic modus operandi.

As I have explained at length in an earlier article in Veterans Today, this type of manipulation by undercover agents in Canada (including the FBI?) probably formed the backstory to the shooting incident in Ottawa on Parliament Hill on October 22, 2014. This event was used to justify Bill C-51, now the Anti-Terrorism Act of 2015, which Rocco Galati and others have observed replicates much of the legislation supporting the fascist governments in Germany and Italy in the 1930s.

Screen Shot 2015-08-19 at 11.45.25 AM

As I wrote in “Witch Hunt on Terrorism,” my own article in We Are Not Charlie Hebdo: Free Thinkers Question the French 9/11, the Ottawa Shooting event of 10/22, (Oct. 22, 2014) initiated a series of apparent false flag events extending to Sydney Australia and then Paris France and then Copenhagen in Denmark.

The circulation of disinformation concerning such events to whip up anti-Muslim hysteria is itself hate speech of the most malicious kind giving sustenance to a kind of contemporary war against Islam whose major conceptual outlines can be traced back to the Jerusalem conference organized by Benjamin Netanyahu in 1979.

—-

Canadian Hate Squad cracks down on book talk by Kevin Barrett, Veterans Today Editor with Anthony Hall

vt-logo2015bbarrett

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2015/08/17/canadian-police/

Canadian Hate Squad cracks down on book talk

by Kevin Barrett, Veterans Today Editor, with Anthony Hall

August 17, 2015

Dr. Kevin Barrett, a Ph.D. Arabist-Islamologist, is one of America’s best-known critics of the War on Terror.

Edmonton, Alberta:-

The Edmonton Police Department’s  Hate Speech Squad has launched an investigation of a scholarly book that questions the War on Terror.

BANNED-IN-CANADA-427x640

On August 16th, two undercover EPD officers attended a book talk at the Rossdale Community League Hall in downtown Edmonton. The officers were investigating  We Are NOT Charlie Hebdo: Free Thinkers Question the French 9/11, which has apparently elicited complaints from B’nai Brith Canada.

Out of uniform and posing as ordinary audience members, the Hate Police officers watched my book talk.  During the intermission between my lecture and the subsequent presentation by University of Lethbridge professor Anthony Hall, the officers flashed their badges and identified themselves as members of the Hate Speech Squad. They said they had received a complaint referencing “conspiracy theories” and “anti-Semitism.” (How a scholarly book that includes essays by several highly accomplished and reputable Jewish contributors, as well as one by an even more Semitic Arab Muslim, can be called “anti-Semitic” is a mystery.)

The lead officer told me: “I didn’t see any problems with anything I heard during your lecture.” On behalf of the Department, he accepted an autographed copy of We Are NOT Charlie Hebdo dedicated “To the Edmonton Police Department Hate Speech Squad – thank you for thinking freely.” The officer said the book will be placed in the Departmental Library.

The Edmonton PD’s We Are NOT Charlie Hebdo investigation raises interesting questions. Are Canadian police departments now charged with giving a “thumbs up” or “thumbs down” to books and book talks? Are Hate Speech Squad officers getting training in literary criticism, investigative journalism and historiography so they can serve as competent peer reviewers and censors? Had the officers disapproved of the lecture, could they have arrested us? If they later read the book and dislike it, will it be banned in Canada? Conversely, if they like it, might they offer a blurb: “Terrific stuff! Certified 100% hate free by the Canadian hate police!”

But seriously, folks: Doesn’t the policing of books and book talks have a chilling effect on freedom of speech and academic freedom? And how and why did this particular book draw the attention of the Hate Police?

“The person who stated you were involved in hate crimes is Amanda Hohmann” emailed Joanne David, the Edmonton event organizer, to Anthony Hall. Amanda Hohmann is the Coordinator of the B’nai Brith Audit of Anti-Semitic Incidents.

Professor Hall was outraged: “They call themselves the B’nai Brith Audit of Anti-Semitism. Auditing! We live in an era of auditing fraud. The banksters are experts in disguising what’s going on through creative bookkeeping. It’s interesting that the concept of audit is now being applied to policing people’s ideas.”

So who was responsible for sending the Hate Police to our book talk? Anthony Hall was unable to get a straight answer:

“I called the B’nai Brith office but wasn’t able to speak to Amanda Hohmann. I asked to speak with CEO Michael Mofton and Senior Legal Counsel David Matas. I indicated it is a serious matter and that I have never been associated with a hate speech crime. So I want to know who complained, what is the nature of the complaint, is there  a text involved? It seems that someone said that our speaking was going to somehow be a violation of some hate speech principles. I wanted to know what the rules are, if there are any rules. Are people just free to snitch anonymously? Can people turn in their partner because they’re mad at him or her? It gets to the whole essence of the Global War on Terror, that people are subject to these repressions. They don’t know what they’re accused of, who is doing the accusing. There’s no due process. It’s an authoritarian police state atmosphere, an East German Stasi type of worldview. And this is creating maximum dissension, distrust and suspicion of one another. And this seems to be the agenda of neocon tyranny. Here we are right in the midst of an election. These issues are front and center. Bill C-51, now the Anti-Terrorism Act 2015, is like the Canadian Patriot Act. (Bill C-51 was passed in the wake of Canada’s 9/11, the Ottawa shooting of 10/22/2014.)

?ottawa-shooting-locations-620x330
The 10/22 false flag brought fascism to Canada

“The Anti-Terrorism Act empowers CSIS, the Canadian Security intelligence Service, to become a kind of Canadian gestapo. This raises the question: Is the B’nai Brith now an adjunct of CSIS? How are we to tell the difference between the B’nai Brith and the Harper government? And of course there’s so much irony, because the specious interpretations of 9/11, 10/22 (the Ottawa shooter event), the Charlie Hebdo event, and so on amount to hate speech! Their purpose is to generate hatred towards Muslims, and to whip up and instrumentalize and exploit Islamophobia for political gain to the neocons. So the agencies responsible for policing and arbitrating hate speech are deeply involved in generating a type of speech, and defending a type of speech, that creates great hatred towards Muslims.”

As of this writing, B’nai Brith has not returned Professor Hall’s phone calls asking for an explanation. Neither, for that matter, have the Edmonton Hate Police:

“I called the Edmonton Police Department. I couldn’t even find out the name of the officers. They gave me the phone number of the Hate Speech Unit. I called and left a message, but they haven’t gotten back to me.”

Richard Awid, manager of the Rossdale Community Center in Edmonton, said there had been several complaints asking him to cancel the event. The complaints were apparently vague and unsubstantiated. Awid, to his credit, stood his ground and allowed the book talk to proceed.

?IMG_0192-640x480
En route to Jasper with Anthony Hall

The Edmonton talk was the final episode of my five Canadian events with Anthony Hall. Two days earlier, our talk in Jasper was introduced by a forceful disclaimer disassociating the owner of the venue – the United Church of Canada – from the event.

Anthony Hall writes:
“This experience we went through in Jasper and especially in Edmonton seem to be a prelude to the kind of relationships  we can expect with the police, the government, and one another. This kind of thing is going to make the university as we’ve known it impossible. I can foresee security clearances for classes and Hate Police officers sitting in.”

In today’s Orwellian world, it seems that critical inquiry is being redefined as hate speech, radicalization, or even  terrorism.

The B’nai Brith Canada website states: “In the future, the League will explore further use of legal means to halt or disrupt the operations of known terrorist organizations with representatives in Canada. The B’nai Brith legal department will play a key role in this effort.”

Are scholarly books now considered a form of terrorism?

Anthony Hall adds: “I find it very troubling that there is this notion of ‘radicalization,’ that everyone just nods their heads assuming it means something. Are universities being defined as agents of radicalization, and professors considered their representatives?”

Hall adds: “The most extreme agent of radicalization in Canada right now is Stephen Harper and the cabal he represents. Imagine having a hate speech hotline when the Prime Minister is running on hate speech! The term he always uses (to incite hatred of Muslims) is ‘jihadism’.”

Fascism Comes to Canada: Stephen Harper One-Ups Leni Riefenstahl (watch this unbelievable video if you dare!)

Will anyone ever explain who sent the Hate Police to my book talk, and why? If those people made slanderous accusations, will they have to answer for them? Stay tuned to TruthJihad.com for updates.
—–

Canada’s Zionist Cheka Border Guards Ban U.S. Author & Veterans Today Editor Dr. Kevin Barrett from Speaking by Kevin Barrett

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2015/05/31/canada-bans/

Screen Shot 2015-06-03 at 9.58.00 AM

Canada Bans Charlie Hebdo Conspiracy Theories
Posted by Kevin Barrett

May 31, 2015

Denied entry into Canada due to hot-potato Charlie Hebdo book

by Kevin Barrett,  Veterans Today Editor

This Friday, after preaching a sermon to 400 people at the Wayne State University mosque in Detroit, I attempted to enter Canada.

The subject of my sermon was “truth vs. hypocrisy.” I urged Muslims to defeat the war on Islam – a genocide campaign that has taken the lives of at least four million Muslims since 1990 – by exposing the truth about the false flag operations that created and sustain it.

The mother of all false flags was 9/11. And the biggest recent one was Charlie Hebdo – a Mossad-DCCI joint operation in Paris last January 7th.

Screen Shot 2015-06-03 at 9.58.30 AM

I played a role in helping expose the Charlie Hebdo false flag in real time, and published We Are NOT Charlie Hebdo: Free Thinkers Question the French 9/11 less than three months later. That book has drawn repeated attacks from the ADL and even the President of France.

Early Friday evening I crossed the Ambassador Bridge into Canada. In my van was a bed, some clothing and personal items, and about 75 copies of We Are NOT Charlie Hebdo.  Over the weekend I was supposed to meet for lunch in London, Ontario with folks interested in the book. Then I would give a talk at a gathering in Toronto honoring the Imam Khomeini.

But Canada’s Zionist-dominated Harper regime had other ideas.

The Zionists who run Canada were lying in wait. They were already planning to unleash potentially violent protests against the Toronto event where I was going to speak. The local Zionist mainstream paper, htttp://www.yorkregion.com, published an article clearly designed to incite violence:

Hundreds vow to protest event honouring Ayatollah

The article quoted a Zionist stooge calling for mayhem:

Tarek Fatah, Pakistan-born Canadian political activist, writer and broadcaster, yesterday called out for protesters to “do something for your country and your children’s future. We need to stand up against these medieval monsters…Let’s kick some Khomeini ass.”

The article also approvingly notes that Canada’s current Defense Minister and the Jewish Defense League (JDL) – one of the world’s most notorious and brutal terrorist groups – are on the same page, even though the JDL is a terrorist organization according to the FBI:

B'naiBrithJDLTerrorOrg

But Jason Kenney, Canada’s defence minister and another politician expected to attend the protest, sees it differently. He voiced his concern via social media last week:

KenneyYarmukle

“Disturbing to see anyone in Canada celebrating the murderous depravity of Ayatollah Khomeini’s brutal dictatorship.”

The Jewish Defence League of Canada and B’nai Brith Canada are also protesting the event.

“B’nai Brith, which represents grassroots Canadian Jewry, believes in a tolerant and pluralistic society that is respectful of all its citizens,” said CEO Michael Mostyn.

 

Screen Shot 2015-06-03 at 9.59.12 AM

So Canada’s current Defense Minister equals the terrorist JDL equals B’nai Brith – and they’re all “tolerant,” “pluralistic” and “respectful” as they get ready to “kick ass.”

Orwellian doublespeak has arrived in Canada…just as “let’s crack down on free speech to honor free speech” arrived in France after Charlie Hebdo, and “they hate our freedoms, so let’s abolish freedom” arrived in America after 9/11.

As Orwell said, if they can get you accepting contradictions without protest, and believing that two plus two make five, they own you.

In any event, it seems the Canadian authorities, meaning the JDL-B’nai Brith-Defense Ministry consortium, had no intention of letting me into Canada to discuss the Charlie Hebdo false flag.

When I pulled up to the border control booth in Windsor, Ontario, I got a normal reception…until the border guard ran my passport. Suddenly the interrogation turned hostile.

“What do you have in your van?”

I started to answer, “Clothes, personal belongings -“

“Why don’t you answer the question?!” the guard angrily barked.

“I am answering the question.”

“I am answering the question,” the guard mocked. “Are you living in your van? Are you homeless? Why don’ t you have a job? Where does your money come from? Are you trying to sneak into Canada and live as a homeless person? Who are you going to meet in Canada? Where are you going to stay? Are you going to sleep in your van?” The guard kept peppering me with non-sequiturs and repeating my answers in a mocking tone. “What else do you have in your van?” “Cassette tapes, books, a sleeping bag -“

“WHAT KIND OF BOOKS?” The guard practically screamed.

I explained that most of them were copies of We Are NOT Charlie Hebdo, which I had edited and published a few months earlier.

“WHY DIDN’T YOU TELL ME ABOUT THE BOOKS?!”

“You didn’t ask. And you interrupted me when I was -“

“YOU DIDN’T TELL ME ABOUT THE BOOKS! We are going to have to search you, please pull over there.”

They ripped off the glove compartment lid with a crowbar because it was stuck shut, damaging my vehicle. I was taken to a waiting room and detained for nearly an hour as they searched every inch of my van. They didn’t let me bring my laptop, so they had access to it for that hour.

Then I was taken to an interrogation center, where I waited for nearly another hour. Then they took me to a small, private interrogation cubicle and produced what they said was a police record about me that they had obtained from the FBI. They claimed the FBI record showed that I had been arrested in Wisconsin and charged with felony drug dealing in June of 1977. I explained that this was a complete fiction, and that I had not even been in Wisconsin in June of 1977, nor had I ever been arrested or charged for dealing drugs, anywhere, in my whole life.

The “FBI record” was full of false information. I had no way to prove it was false.

The agent told me I was being refused entry to Canada based on that information.

I told the agent that I had been through the same procedure during many recent visits to Canada, that they had checked the same file, run the same FBI paperwork, and there had never been a problem. Why was my “FBI file” suddenly peppered with false information, and why was I suddenly now being denied entry?

He advised me to visit the Michigan State Police and have them provide a correct version of the FBI’s file on me. He gave me directions to the Michigan State Police office in Taylor, half an hour south of Detroit.

When I re-entered the US I was also singled out for a long search and interrogation.

By the time I got to the State Police building in Taylor it was 11 pm and they were closed for the weekend.

I contacted VT Senior Editor Gordon Duff, who spent two years as a Michigan State Trooper before joining a certain alphabet agency. Gordon said: “The Canadians are lying.”

Gordon explained that it would likely take weeks to deal with the false information in the alleged FBI file, and that the Michigan State Police would be unable to help; and that it was obvious that the Canadians were denying me entry for political reasons. I would have to report a possible case of identity theft, and the wheels and gears of bureaucracy would turn slowly before I even found out whether there really was an American record about a (nonexistent) drug dealing arrest in 1977 and so on and so forth.

So now I am in the company of folks like George Galloway, who was also barred from speaking in Canada.

What does it mean? Why are they banning me from Canada now, when they let me enter less than two years ago for a trip across the eastern half of the country, and even let me enter to participate in THREE 9/11 truth conferences (most recently in 2012)? Why am I suddenly so dangerous?

The answer, apparently, is that my work exposing the Charlie Hebdo false flag has touched a nerve.

Since I announced plans for the book in February, I have been hit with torrents of abuse, including  death threats. And the pushback has greatly escalated since the book’s publication. French President Francois Hollande, responding to the Charlie Hebdo truth movement, called for a ban on “conspiracy theories” at the French, European, and international levels. His think tank produced a police dossier on the world’s five leading “conspiracy intellectuals” and I’m one of them.

Why are they so afraid of “Charlie Hebdo truth” ?

I suspect the answer lies in Copenhagen, Denmark; Garland, Texas; and now Phoenix, Arizona.

The Charlie Hebdo perpetrators – a global Zionist organized crime network that owns Mossad and has tentacles in other Western intelligence agencies – designed the Charlie Hebdo attacks as the PR launch for a whole series of smaller but similar events … in much the same way they designed 9/11 as the PR launch for the “war on terror” whose follow-up events included the Madrid train bombings, the London 7/7/2005 “terror drill,” and so on.

Screen Shot 2015-06-03 at 10.21.57 AM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=JKvkhe3rqtc

The theme of the new Zio-terrorist false flag campaign is simple: “Muslims are violent, freedom-hating maniacs who over-react to cartoons.”

The new book We Are NOT Charlie Hebdo! Free Thinkers Question the French 9/11 completely deconstructs this campaign at every level. And its timely appearance is the key to its effectiveness. It would be as if David Ray Griffin and Christopher Bollyn had gotten their 9/11 books published in 2001.

No wonder the Zionists who own Canada don’t like me.

And let’s go ahead and name some names.

The real ruler of Canada is the Bronfman organized crime family. This Jewish-Zionist criminal organization has dominated the Canadian “deep state” since it rose to power manufacturing and smuggling liquor during Prohibition.

It is an open secret in Canada that the Bronfman syndicate owns Stephen Harper. No wonder the Canadian Defense Ministry and the Jewish Defense League have merged.

The Bronfman syndicate also owns or influences most of the Canadian media. Their lackey Jonathan Kay, an obvious Israeli asset who has co-written a book with a Mossad agent lionizing that agency, was a key player at the National Post and the man who was tasked with writing the big-publishing-house book slandering “9/11 conspiracy theorists.”

And that’s not all. VT Senior Editor Gordon Duff, during my visit to his house near Toledo in the wake of the Canadian border fiasco, told me that the Bronfmans were key players in 9/11. Gordon says they worked closely with Netanyahu smuggling the miniature nuclear weapons used in the demolitions of the Twin Towers. (The ongoing saga of Israel’s misbehavior with advanced nuclear weapons is a favorite topic of Gordon’s; he also updated me on the slam-dunk proof that Israel has dropped nuclear weapons on Yemen, a monstrous outrage, and a story that is starting to get traction around the world.)

Bottom line: I was turned away from Canada, and denied the right to practice free speech, by the criminal organization that has largely controlled the Canada-US border since prohibition, and totally controls it today.

—-

Kevin Barrett

Dr. Kevin Barrett, a Ph.D. Arabist-Islamologist, is one of America’s best-known critics of the War on Terror.

He is Host of TRUTH JIHAD RADIO; a hard driving weekly LIVE call in radio show.He also has appeared many times on Fox, CNN, PBS and other broadcast outlets, and has inspired feature stories and op-eds in the New York Times, the Christian Science Monitor, the Chicago Tribune, and other leading publications.

Dr. Barrett has taught at colleges and universities in San Francisco, Paris, and Wisconsin, where he ran for Congress in 2008. He currently works as a nonprofit organizer, author, and talk radio host.

The Jewish Tribe Unites Against the World’s Collective Outrage over Israel’s Genocide of Palestinians – Jerusalem Post

 

Mission Accomplished– ‘Wartime unity conceals political differences among American Jews’

 

Mark Glenn, Editor of The Ugly Truth website notes: –as we said here from the beginning, one of the objects in this entire exercise in ritualistic human sacrifice being perpetrated against the innocent people in Gaza was to rejoin the various divisions within the Jewish community worldwide, and in this respect, the honest observer watching all that is taking place can confidently say ‘Mission accomplished’.

RPEditor400

Dear Reader,

I want to draw your attention to the fact that B’nai Brith International and B’nai Brith Canada are on the top of the list of Jewish organizations who are 101% behind the genocide that is currently going on in GAZA-PALESTINE.

This is also the organization that’s responsible for filing the sec. 319(2) CCC “Hate Crime” complaint against me and RadicalPress.com that resulted in my arrest and theft of all of my computers and electronic files back on May 16th, 2012. I am currently facing trial by judge and jury in the British Columbia Supreme Court as a result of these machinations by Canada’s Jewish lobby.

What this tells me and should tell ALL Canadians is that these Jewish lobby groups are in fact subversive agents of International Zionism implanted in every sovereign nation in order to disrupt and subvert their judicial systems and create “Hate Propaganda” legislation that is then used to silence and penalize their critics.

How convenient indeed when it comes to Israel’s murderous, cold-blooded bombing of Palestinians that Canada should have federal legislation that equates criticism of such actions as being “anti-Semitic” and “hateful” and therefore indictable for anyone who stands up for Gaza and Peace. Canadians across the country are criticizing both Israel, the Jews and Israel’s political ideology which we know as ZIONISM. Will B’nai Brith Canada now be hunting down every website owner and blogger and journalist who has disagreed with Israel’s murderous policies and charging them with a sec. 319(2) “Hate Crime” offence? Such is the blasphemy of those who call themselves Jews and who, when it comes down to the crunch, stick together, as Lenny Bruce the Jewish comedian once said, like snot to a suede jacket whenever Israel comes under attack.

–––––

Jerusalem Post

Political differences among the main American Jewish denominations and organizations have been put on the back burner during Israel’s Gaza incursion, indicating the emergence of a rare consensus.

“There is across the board solidarity,” Malcolm Hoenlein, the executive vice chairman of the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations, told The Jerusalem Post on Wednesday.

Over the past several days, a number of US Jewish organizations, including a number of traditionally liberal and dovish groups, have issued statements of unqualified support for Israel’s invasion of the coastal territory.

Groups such as B’nai B’rith and the Anti-Defamation League have publicly endorsed Operation Protective Edge, while Rabbi William Gershon, the president of the Conservative movement’s Rabbinical Assembly, called for Hamas to be “isolated, removed from power and structurally dismantled.”

According to Hoenlein, whose organization lobbies the White House on behalf of a wide range of American Jewish interests, American Jews believe that the Israeli government has “acted with restraint and that the current situation is intolerable.”

Gershon and others have acknowledged the large number of Gazan civilians who have died in the fighting, but place the onus for their deaths squarely on Hamas, which operates out of civilian areas and has called on noncombatants to remain in their homes despite Israeli calls for the evacuation of conflict zones.

“I believe that for many American Jews, and actually there are polls suggesting Americans in general, what has become clear is that no matter what your political persuasion prior to this conflict is, that Israel faces an enemy that is sworn to its destruction,” Gershon said.

The current conflict, he continued, is not about West Bank settlements or a two-state solution, but about fighting an organization calling for the destruction of the Jewish state.

“We want to be a moral people, but you can’t be a moral people if you are dead. I think that this is the stark reality that the American Jewish community has come to understand,” he said.

When a country is under attack people tend to move to the Right, Prof. Steven Cohen of Hebrew Union College explained.

The Right tends to have a more critical attitude toward adversaries while the Left maintains a more charitable view, he said. “Obviously when the enemy is attacking Israel then people are going to adopt a more hostile view of the enemy, so in that respect the so-called movement to the Right is really a reflection of there being combat conditions.”

The real question, he continued, is what happens during the weeks and months after the cessation of hostilities.

“You think about the war in Lebanon or the Yom Kippur War where Jews were seemingly very hawkish and then they moved to a more dovish posture.

So we don’t know what is going to happen here,” Cohen said.

The current rightward shift comes as Israel is fighting what many Jews perceive as a more morally simple conflict than the Israeli-Palestinian situation as a whole and seems to be a temporary departure from the overall shift to the Left among younger American Jews.

According to the Pew Research Center, American Jews under the age of 30 are “less apt to say Israel is making sincere efforts at peacemaking as compared with Jews 30 and older.”

“Younger Jews who care about Israel who are not Orthodox tend to have more skeptical views of the Israeli government and of Israeli policy,” Cohen said.

Jonathan Sarna, the president of the Association for Jewish Studies, agreed, recalling that “historically, American Jews have united around Israel when it is under attack.

“That was true in 1967 and has been true to a greater or lesser extent ever since. At the moment, most Israelis are united behind the operation, so American Jews who take their cue from one or another Israeli position or newspaper are happy to unite as well,” he explained.

US support for the war, with 57 percent of Americans backing Israeli actions in Gaza, further emboldens Jews in their positions, and the relative lack of media coverage compared to previous rounds of violence, due mainly to events in Syria, Ukraine and elsewhere, has “makes it easier to unite behind Israel,” Sarna said.

Leonard Saxe, a researcher at Brandeis University, said there is anecdotal evidence that Birthright participants who have returned from Israel over the past several weeks “came away profoundly affected” and that their views have helped shape opinion on the Jewish street in the US.

Communal leaders who spoke with the Post largely agreed with such assessments.

“I believe that in times of existential threat – we have always come together. Because, in the end, that which divides us is so much less than that which unites us,” explained Rabbi Leonard A. Matanky of the Rabbinical Council of America.

One of the outliers in the American Jewish community is the left-wing J Street lobby, which pulled out of a community- wide pro-Israel rally in Boston several days ago.

In a letter to the Jewish Community Relations Council of Boston, which organized the rally and which counts J Street as a member, the lobby stated that it had pulled its sponsorship of the rally because the “roster of speakers did not include a pro-Israel, pro-peace perspective.”

“What was missing for us in this rally, and what ultimately precluded our co-sponsorship, was that despite our efforts, there was no space made to raise the issues that follow from our commitment to Israel’s Jewish and democratic future. There was no voice for our concerns about the loss of human life on both sides, or the acknowledgment of the conflict’s complexity and that the only way to truly end it is through a political solution,” J Street’s Shaina Wasserman wrote.

J Street’s decision to not participate was “shocking,” Barry Shrage, president of Boston’s Combined Jewish Philanthropies, told The Post. “We have a very big tent and want to include everybody who wants to be pro-Israel.”

According to Shrage, the issue of casualties on both sides was raised at the rally, but “issues like this that don’t have to do with the West Bank” or other political contretemps between Israel and the Palestinians.

Gershon also took issue with J Street’s decision, calling it “reprehensible” and saying it sent a message that would be “seized upon” by “Israel’s enemies.”

“There is a time to debate nuance and complexity and there is a time to come together to defend the right of Israel to exist,” he said. “In the middle of a war is not the time in my opinion to be exploring the complexities of the Arab-Israeli conflict.”

“I do want to be clear that our decision not to participate in the rally was not based on what statements the other participating organizations have or have not made about the current crisis, nor was it based on some implication that J Street is the only organization that sees the complexity of the conflict,” a spokeswoman for J Street told the Post.

“In solidarity with Israel during this difficult time, we have co-sponsored pro-Israel community-wide rallies in Philadelphia and San Diego. While we chose not to co-sponsor one rally in Boston, we sent representatives and mobilized support for the event, just as we have for events in many other communities nationwide,” J Street said.

A National Leadership Assembly, gathering hundreds of American Jewish leaders from across the country, is slated for Monday at the National Press Club in Washington.

The group, which will include representatives of the more than 50 member-organizations of the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations, the Jewish Federations and others, will gather at the National Press Club “to show support across the board of the Jewish community and the bipartisan support for Israel in Washington,” Hoenlein announced.

Protocols of the Ruffle-Crested Kikes of Zion by Professor Banjo Billy

Riffle-Crested Kikes

http://www.jrbooksonline.com/PDF_Books/Protocols_of_the_Ruffle_Crested_Kikes_of_Zion.pdf

or on this site: http://www.radicalpress.com/?attachment_id=5700

 

Dear Radical Reader,

Enclosed above is the url to the pdf document “The Protocols of the Ruffle-Crested Kikes of Zion” which I found to be extremely interesting especially for those who have read The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion. The author of this critique on the question of the “authenticity” of the Protocols has done an amazingly fine job of delving into the details of all the various schemes and scams that the Jews have come up with in order to instil fear and loathing of the small book that exposes their heinous agenda for global control of the goyim.

As well the writer provides much background information which in most cases receives only cursory mention in other books on the subject. Please pass this around to as many folks as you can. It’s a welcome addition to the Protocols themselves and gives the reader a number of interesting and useful tidbits of information should one ever be challenged by the Jews on the issue of the Protocols being a “forgery”.

I will undoubtedly be able to employ the information contained in this document in my upcoming sec. 319(2) “hate crime” trial given that one of their primary components of the complaint laid against me consists in my having the Protocols on RadicalPress.com.

Upon reading this document it will be fairly evident why they are still flogging this same dead horse.

 

Sincerely,

 

Arthur Topham
Pub/Ed
The Radical Press
“Digging to the root of the issues since 1998”

 

“Hate Speech” Laws Require Us to Accept Evil by Tony Blizzard

“Hate Speech” Laws Require Us to Accept Evil

May 19, 2014

 

homeland-jesus1

 

Historical background on “hate speech” laws

Veteran Patriot Tony Blizzard wrote this article for “The Spotlight” twenty years ago. It is just as relevant today. 

Because “hatred is based on love,” reasoned Aquinas, “it follows that hatred is a great power for good in man’s life. Hatred enables man to avoid the evils that would destroy him.”

 

By Tony Blizzard

 

“Hate-speech” laws are in reality a program to force us to accept the actions of those who hate Christian culture.

They allow the Illuminati to destroy everything the western world holds sacred while criminalizing anyone who defends our cherished way of life. In the U.S., as far back as the 1930s, the question of whether hate should be outlawed had been broached by the enemies of truth, due larg ely to the Nazi movement in Germany and the America First movement’s exposures of Talmudic drum beating for U.S. involvement in WWII.

Patriots who saw no reason for America to enter that war–except to save communism–were rounded up and tried for sedition in a soviet style political show trial.

While every effort was made to present the defendants as haters of America, it was their internationalist accusers who harbored real hatred for our national principles.

The propaganda barrage stigmatizing patriots as “haters” only escalated when the globalist United Nations came into existence after that destructive war, which did save communism utilizing American might.

Cardinal Spellman

In a 1947 publication approved by Cardinal Spellman of New York, Rituale Romanum, the anti-hate issue was put into proper perspective.

“The long-range effects of this campaign [to criminalize selected hatreds] are even now evident. It is producing the ‘spineless citizen,’ the man who has no cultural sensibilities, who is incapable of indignation, who faces moral disaster, political disaster and impending world catastrophe with a blank and smiling countenance. He has only understanding for the enemies of his country, nothing but kind sentiments for those who would destroy his home and family. He is universally tolerant, totally unprejudiced. If he has any principles he keeps them well concealed. He is a faceless, characterless puttyman.”

Real men of that generation despised such people as “gutless wonders.” Today they are praised as “politically correct.”

G. K. Chesterton, always ahead of his time, mused: “Modern toleration is really a tyranny. It is a tyranny because it is a silence. To say that I must not deny my opponent’s faith is to say I must not discuss it.”

B’NAI BRITH AND THOMAS AQUINAS

That is exactly the censorship objective of the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai Brith (ADL), as the creator and promoter of “hate speech” laws throughout the world. Those ADL conspirators work to nullify intolerance for evils they promote, arrogantly retaining for them- selves the right to be world arbiter of what will be tolerated a nd what will not, replacing the edicts of God and nature concerning right and wrong with their own total intolerance of anything in the way of their world conquest agenda.

In order to understand the true purpose of ADL written and lobbied “hate speech” laws, already in place in nations such as Germany, Canada and Britain–and scheduled by the ADL for every nation, it is necessary to understand something of the passion called “hate.”

St. Thomas Aquinas

Universally acclaime d deep thinker of the ages, Thomas Aquinas, recorded that all passions stem from the single passion of love. Hatred, the “contrary of love,” Aquinas contended, is simply passion against that which would threaten a love.

For instance, one’s hatred of poison is a reaction to love for one’s life.

Because “hatred is based on love,” reasoned Aquinas, “it follows that hatred is a great power for good in man’s life. Hatred enables man to avoid the evils that would destroy him.”

It is precisely the hatred for those evils now in the process of destroying western civilization which the ADL-written “hate crime” laws are designed to criminalize, neutralize and quiet, always in the name of undiscriminating tolerance. To thus “make putty” of the collective will for the defense of western man’s civilization is a necessity to the implementation of the new world order slave state of the global plantation. Those “plantation owners” are too few in number to conquer and rule without the manipulated cooperation of their victims.

THE REAL HATERS

No mainstream media mention is ever made that the same forces who write laws to stymie the hatred of evils they sponsor, are the world’s real haters, especially intolerant of anything concerning Christ and Christianity.

The reason for their intense hatred was given by the Pharisees when they demanded Christ’s crucifixion. Unless destroyed, they announced, he will “take away our place and our nation.”

Their intense love of their exalted position among the Israelites, with attendant perks, was threatened by the superior teachings of Christ, who was drawing the people away from their control, thus engendering their bitter hatred against him. That hatred has not waned to this day among the leaders of Judaism.

It has been written into the Talmud itself. Those revealing today’s fabrications indoctrinated into Jewish culture may definitely take away that leadership’s “place and nation,” thus the vicious, hateful attacks on historical attempts to update “holocaust” information, list crimes of the political Zionist movement, explode the “chosen people” myth, debunk Jews as perpetual victims, expose the substantial Jewish role in organized crime and in high level financial misdeeds, etc.

RUSE FOR CENSORSHIP AND TYRANNY

Even before the ADL existed, in 1908, New York City police commissioner, Theodore A. Bingham, in reference to an investigation of the ongoing white slave trade, remarked that 50 percent of NY crime was committed by Jews. Bingham’s career was destroyed and such remarks have been banned from the media since.

This event resulted in the creation of the powerful New York Kehillah, which instantly, in conjunction with the Amer ican Jewish Committee, saw to it that a national magazine discontinued its series on the white slave trade after its introductory article.

Likewise, major book publisher, George Haven Putnam, owner of Putnam and Sons, was forced, in 1920, to trash an already printed edition of the much maligned Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, heeding hardly veiled blackmail threats of bankruptcy from ADL member Louis Marshall, a forceful figure in New York politics as well as world Zionism.

The SPOTLIGHT has very recently informed readers of ongoing censorship by this same ADL gang, which today uses total cens orship power over all school texts, libraries and the establishment media, blacklisting all materials it will not tolerate, yet all the while blathering to the public how it must tolerate any affront on Western culture lest it offend some thin-skinned pervert.

Defense of family, community and nation against such evils is labeled “hateful” and outlawed. Yet, ongoing destruction of those entities by people who seethe with hatred for them is to be tolerated by “puttyman” or he will be jailed.

Such an arrogant, in-your-face, double standard requires your intense hatred and opposition, as it will, i f allowed to continue, destroy everything you love.

PORNOGRAPHY AS A SECRET WEAPON, by Lasha Darkmoon

Swine-men11

PORNOGRAPHY AS A SECRET WEAPON, by Lasha Darkmoon

Posted on May 9, 2014 by Montecristo

Pornography is deployed today as a psyop or mind weapon: to pacify, control, brutalize, and ultimately enslave the masses. 

“We corrupt in order to rule.”
— Italian Freemason Giuseppe Mazzini

. . . by Lasha Darkkmoon

How do you take a nation of free and independent citizens and turn them into slaves? How do you do this slowly and imperceptibly, without violence, and with the willing participation of the slaves-to-be?  

The answer is simple.

You corrupt them, undermine them, deprave them, demoralize them, until they have acquired all the characteristics of slaves.

As the sorceress Circe, with a wave of her magic wand, turned the followers of Ulysses into grunting swine, you can wield your weapon of mass hypnosis, the media, over a nation and transform its citizens into willing slaves. You can learn to roboticize man and turn him into a living machine. This is power. This is what it must feel like to be God — or the Devil.

Is there a secret weapon or “magic wand” for turning men into swine? Yes, there is. Sex is the secret weapon, the magic device, that turns men into swine.

1.  Jews use pornography “to destroy gentile morals”

Who are the richest and most successful entrepreneurs of the $100 billion year porn industry? [1] The peddlers of pornography belong to all races, but one race above all stands out as preeminent in this field.  Selling sex, like slave trafficking and moneylending, has always been a Jewish speciality.

Jewish academic Dr Nathan Abrams:  “Though Jews make up only 2 percent of the American population, they dominate porn.”

Jewish academic historian Dr Nathan Abrams (right), perhaps the world’s most renowned authority on the Jewish role in pornography, let the cat out of the bag a few years ago in his controversial essay, Triple-Exthnics. [2]

Published in the prestigious Jewish Quarterly in 2004, this essay spelled out in detail how the world’s multibillion dollar porn industry was dominated by Jews.

Dr Abrams not only admits that Jews are the world’s most successful pornographers, he celebrates the fact. Jews, he tells us, have a grudge against Christianity, an “atavistic hatred of Christian authority” rooted in centuries of humiliation, and pornography is one of the ways in which they get their revenge on their Christian persecutors — the hateful oppressors who expelled them from 109 countries since the year 250 AD, always without justification. [3]

So it’s now payback time.

Jewish involvement in pornography [Dr Abrams notes candidly] has a long history in the United States. Though Jews make up only two per cent of the American population, they have been prominent in pornography.

According to one anonymous industry insider quoted by E. Michael Jones in the magazine Culture Wars (May 2003), “the leading male performers through the 1980s came from secular Jewish upbringings and the females from Roman Catholic day schools”.

The standard porn scenario became as a result a Jewish fantasy of schtupping the Catholic shiksa [non-Jewish female].

Jewish involvement in the X-rated industry can be seen as a proverbial two fingers to the entire WASP establishment in America.

Jewish involvement in porn, Dr Abrams believes, “is the result of an atavistic hatred of Christian authority: they are trying to weaken the dominant culture in America by moral subversion.” [4]

“CHRIST SUCKS!”  — Al Goldstein, Jewish pornographer

Al Goldstein (pictured), the publisher of Screwmagazine, had once said — and Dr Abrams is happy to quote him: “The only reason that Jews are in pornography is that we think that CHRIST SUCKS.”

Dr Abrams’ indulgent attitude to porn is a little surprising. Here is a man who actually believes that Jewish domination of the porn industry is a stunning achievement. Jews get gold stars for masturbation promotion.

ADL National Director, Abraham H. Foxman,agrees with the “liberal” idea that pornography is a good thing — if not for the countless victims of porn addiction, at least for Jews who grow rich on exploiting those addicts. “Those Jews who enter the pornography industry,” Foxman notes with approval, “have done so as individuals pursuing the American dream.” [5]

Dr Abrams, the sober Jewish academic, now ups the ante by adding a sinister touch to the controversy. “Jews are the driving force behind the modern pornographic industry,” he tells us smugly, “and their motivation is, in part, to destroy gentile morals.” [6]

To destroy gentile morals.

Note that phrase well. It amounts to an open declaration of war. For why should Jews wish to “destroy gentile morals” unless they hated the gentiles — in this case, Christians —  and wanted to destroy our most  cherished values?

Sarah Silverman

There is no law to prevent this Jewish comedienne (pictured opposite) from uttering blasphemous obscenities against Jesus Christ and giving offense to 2.1 billion Christians by her infamous comment, “I hope the Jews did kill Christ! I’d fucking do it again — in a second!”

Just imagine an equally well-known Christian comedian coming out with a similar insult against the victims of the Holocaust: “I hope the Nazis DID kill 6 million Jews! I’d fucking do it again — in a second!” 

Such a grossly offensive comment would be unthinkable. The comic who made it would be ostracized at once and never allowed to work again in the entertainment business.

And yet the Jew today, in the person of Sarah Silverman, is perfectly free to spit in the Christian’s face and is even applauded for this hate speech.  The Christian can do nothing about it. He has become a slave in his own country — an object of ridicule and contempt.

2.  How Jews Dominate the American Porn Industry

It comes as no surprise to learn that Jews dominate the production and distribution of pornography. If you want to learn more about these luminaries of lust and see what they look like, here is an excellent starting point.

In a now defunct article entitled Jews in Porn, parts of which have been published on Henry Makow’s site,  Luke Ford notes:

Used to hatred from society, Jews will do its dirty work – such as money-lending in the Middle Ages or porn today – for the opportunity to make money.

Persecuted for millennia in the various societies they’ve lived in, many Jews developed an allegiance to their own survival as their highest value and care little about the survival of the persecuting society.

Even when Jews live in a society that welcomes them instead of harassing them, many Jews hate the majority culture.

Neither rooted in their own tradition or in that of the majority Christian tradition, they live in a community of rebels.

Because of Judaism’s emphasis on education and verbal dexterity, Jews dominate academia, entertainment and media generally. Porn flows out of this culture over which Jews exert an influence disproportionate to their 2% proportion of the American population. [7]

•••

Robert J. Stoller, M.D. in his 1991 book, Porn: Myths for the Twentieth Century, sought to understand the mentality of the people involved in the hard core pornography business. While interviewing some of the actors and actresses in California, he was told, “If you’re welcomed into the porn scene, it’s unbelievable. It’s an extended family…. So many Jewish people involved with it.” [8]

SAN FERNANDO VALLEY Known also as "POrn Valley", this Jewish bastion of sleaze is reported to produce 90 percent of America's smut.

Today, most porn movies and porn videos in America are produced by Jews in the San Fernando Valley (pictured) in Southern California. This is located just north of Los Angeles in a sprawl of seedy suburbs known to locals as “Porn Valley” or “the Other Hollywood”.

Here Jews are the kingpins of the sex industry and own every single major studio. Chief among these is Vivid Entertainment [9], reportedly the largest porn production company in the world.

This is owned by Jewish multi-billionaire Steven Hirsch, sometimes known as the “Porn King”. Vivid generates an estimated $100 million a year in revenue, cranking out 60 films per year and selling them in video stores, hotel rooms, on cable systems and on the Internet. [10]

“Sex is a powerful thing,”  Hirsch notes complacently. “This is the right time for us!” [11]

Another billionaire Jewish porn mogul, Paul Fishbein, founder of Adult Video News (AVN), is also headquartered in Porn Valley, California. Fishbein’s business associates, Irving Slifkin, Barry Rosenblatt, and Eli Cross are all fabulously rich Jews. [12]

So make no mistake: Porn Valley, California, is a Jewish enclave, as Jewish as Tel Aviv or Brooklyn.

JEWISH SUPREMO ABE FOXMAN: “Those Jews who enter the porn industry have done so as individuals pursuing the American dream.”

3.  The Jewish Role in Child Pornography

According to the British charity, National Children’s Homes, 55 percent of the world’s child porn in made in America. [13]

It would be astonishing to learn that Jews were not in the forefront of this sordid enterprise also, given that they dominate the porn industry as a whole. [14]

Pedophilia is a worldwide phenomenon, but it is an undeniable fact that the large number of Jews who practice it appear to do so with a certain impunity. Roman Polanski, after he had drugged and raped an unconscious nymphette, got off the hook lightly. All he had to do was buy a one-way ticket to Paris, France. Nothing was done to bring him to justice.

In July 2000, Brazilian police tried to arrest the Israeli vice-consul in Rio de Janeirio, Arie Scher. He was wanted on suspicion of running a child porn ring from the Israeli embassy. Vast quantities of pornographic material had been found on his computer. What happened to Scher? Nothing. Claiming diplomatic immunity, he hopped on a plane to Tel Aviv and that was the last that was heard of him. [15]

Another Jewish pedophile too important to receive serious punishment for his crimes was the son of the famous science fiction writer Isaac Asimov. Found in possession of the hugest cache of child pornography in California, a federal crime normally carrying a 20-year sentence, David Asimov was to receive a slap on the wrist: six months home detention.

How is it he got off so lightly? “A look at the players yields the answer,” a sensational news report reads. “Asimov’s child porn stash was so big that many child victims and perpetrators would have taken a fall had Asimov been zealously prosecuted at trial.” [16]

There is one law for the Jews, it seems, and another for us lesser mortals.

Polanski-cartoon

4.  Jewish Gang involved in Child Murder and Snuff Pornography

If 55 percent of the world’s child pornography is produced in the US — according to the British charity National Children’s Homes — 23 percent of the world’s child porn is produced in Russia. [17]

Whether or not Russian child porn is dominated by Russian Jews remains a nebulous issue. There is a high probability that it is, given that there is more than enough solid evidence of Russian Jewish involvement in sex trafficking, kidnapping, pedophilia, and even child murder in the production of snuff porn movies.

See endnote 17 for more on the subject of the Jewish role in the world child porn industry.

Here is a news report first published in October 2000. It will give the reader some idea of the depths of depravity to which some pornographers are willing to sink:

JEWISH GANGSTERS RAPED,
KILLED CHILDREN AS YOUNG AS TWO ON FILM

Rome, Italy — Italian and Russian police, working together, broke up a ring of Jewish gangsters who had been involved in the manufacture of child rape and snuff pornography.

Three Russian Jews and eight Italian Jews were arrested after police discovered they had been kidnapping non-Jewish children between the ages of two and five years old from Russian orphanages, raping the children, and then murdering them on film.

Mostly non-Jewish customers, including 1700 nationwide, 600 in Italy, and an unknown number in the United States, paid as much as $20,000 per film to watch little children being raped and murdered.

Jewish officials in a major Italian news agency tried to cover the story up, but were circumvented by Italian news reporters, who broadcast scenes from the films live at prime time on Italian television to more than 11 million Italian viewers. Jewish officials then fired the executives responsible, claiming they were spreading “blood libel.”

Though AP and Reuters both ran stories on the episode, US media conglomerates refused to carry the story on television news, saying that it would prejudice Americans against Jews. [18]

 3-YEAR-OLD GIRL

3-YEAR-OLD GIRL

According to the Talmud, 3-year-old girls like this are fair game for sex with adults (Sanhedrin 54b). Killing them is permissible too. “The best of the gentiles deserves to be killed,” the revered Rabbi ben Yohai states authoritatively in the Talmud. [19]

_______________________________

5.  Mass Enslavement through Sex

It is a tragedy that the Jews should have been allowed to deploy pornography to such good effect that they have succeeded in enslaving entire nations, as Circe with a touch of her magic wand enslaved the Greeks, turning men into swine: an apt metaphor for what lies ahead for the masses under their new masters.

“A really efficient totalitarian state,” Aldous Huxley once noted, “would be one in which the all-powerful executive of political bosses and their army of managers control a population of slaves who do not have to be coerced, because they love their servitude.” [20]

Organized Jewry seems to have no moral scruples about profiting from the sale of pornography. They show no concern about the proven fact that highly addictive and dangerous erototoxins are released into the brain after contact with pornography and can cause progressive brain damage. [21]

Nor do these pornocentric Jews have any qualms of conscience in regard to the wholesale corruption of families, whether Jewish or non-Jewish,  or show the slightest concern about the tragic descent of children into the hell of compulsive masturbation and porn addiction — a subject I have covered in detail in a soon-to-be-published article.

These sex entrepreneurs, intent on easy profits, have eagerly sought to provide the masses with the cheapest and deadliest of tranquilizers: opportunities for endless orgasms, by way of a ceaseless flow of pornographic images in the mass media they control.

This is one way to achieve world domination without the need for revolutionary violence or military conquest: to take entire countries and turn them into giant masturbatoria.

The model citizens of the future will be happy masturbators. This enthralling activity will keep them occupied throughout the day. It will make them docile and complacent, sated and semi-somnolent, like drugged dung flies in a cesspool or swilling latrine. They will be too busy debauching themselves to mount revolutions or plan revenge attacks against the shadowy elite who have been the architects of their slavery.

These are not the worldchangers and wizards of the future of whom Nietzsche said,“Behold, I show you the Superman!” Because of their degeneracies, their weaknesses, they are destined for the dustbin of history.

Men in strip club

MEN  IN  STRIP  CLUB

“Behold, I show you the Superman!”
—  Friedrich Nietzsche, Thus Spake Zarathustra

___________________________________________

Here is what Brother Nathanael Kapner has to say on this subject. It is a neat summation. The fact that Kapner is Jewish makes his words even more compelling:

“The degradation of Western Christian social life did not merely happen, it was planned, deliberately fostered and spread, as outlined by The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion. This systematic undermining of the culture of the West continues today.

The instruments of this assault on Christian culture and consciousness are the weapons of propaganda: the press, television, cinema, and education. The chief fount of the propaganda is the cinema.

From his capital in Hollywood, the Jew spews out an endless series of perverted films to debase and degenerate the youth of America and the Western world. Divorce replaces marriage, abortion replaces birth, and the family becomes the battleground of individual strife. The Jew has attained his goal in destroying Western culture.” [22]

I am afraid I cannot agree with Kapner’s sweeping conclusion that the Jews are entirely to blame for the decline and fall of Western culture. If the West has gone to hell in a handbasket, the goyim are as much to blame. Their enthusiastic complicity with their own corrupters has been their undoing.

The society we get is the society we deserve.

6.  Conclusion

There is little doubt that the virulent sex epidemic we witness all around us is a deliberately planned sex psyop. This is what governments want.

The Puppet Masters who pull the hidden strings of our Western regimes, all masquerading as democracies, have managed to manufacture exactly what we see when we look around us: widespread neurosis, mass misery, the collapse of moral values, Christianity in ruins, and the coarse brutalization of the common man.

No need for gulags for those who consent to their own chains.

____________________________________________________________

ENDNOTES

[1]   “Worldwide pornography industry approaches $100 billion.”

[2]    Nathan Abrams, Triple-exthnics, (Jewish Quarterly, Winter 2004, Number 196). Nathan Abrams on Jews in the American porn industry.  

[3]   109 Locations whence Jews have been Expelled since AD250

[4]   Nathan Abrams, Op.cit.

[5]    Quoted in Nathan Abrams, Op. cit. 

[6]   Nathan Abrams, Op. cit.

[7]   Quoted in Henry Makow, Jews and Porn.

[8]    Robert J. Stoller, Porn: Myths for the Twentieth Century.

[9]   “Hard Times in Porn Valley.”

[10]   Vivid Entertainment (Wikipedia).

[11]    Forbes magazine, “The Porn King”. # 20,000 pornographic videos are produced each year in the San Fernando Valley, roughly at the rate of one new porn video every 40 minutes. (Rachel Alexander, Porn Addition at Crisis Levels.)

[12]   AVN Magazine (Wikipedia, history).

[13]    Penn State Law Professors Trot Out ‘Female Porn Leaders’ to Whitewash Realities of Adult Industry (explicit language).

[14]   Dr Lasha Darkmoon, Masters of Porn: The Systematic Promotion of Sexual Deviance. (See also n.2 above, Dr Nathan Abrams, Triple-Exthnics).

[15]   (1) Brazilian police stake out diplomat accused of running kiddie-porn ring (07/06/2000). (2) Israeli Consul Assistant involved with prostitution of minors escapes from Brazil (07/05/2000). (3) Brazil links Israeli consul to child prostitution (07/05/2000).

[16]   Isaac Asimov’s son, his involvement in child porn.  Link lost. We receive the message, “Server not found. Firefox can’t find the server at www.newsmakingnews.com.”

[17]   Penn State Law Professors Trot Out ‘Female Porn Leaders’ to Whitewash Realities of Adult Industry.

Since  55 percent of the world’s child porn is produced in the US (see above), and since 90 percent of US porn is produced by Jews in the San Fernando Valley, California, it follows that Jews dominate the child porn industry in America.

In addition, if 23 percent of the world’s child porn is produced in Russia, it is more than likely that Russian Jews are behind this sleazy industry  in view of the well-known involvement of the Judeo-Russian mafia in sex trafficking, sex slavery, prostitution and pornography in general.

This would make the Jews the predominant purveyors of child pornography  in the world — a remarkable achievement for a race who make up no more than 0.2 percent of the world’s population.

[18]   “Jewish Gangsters Raped, Killed Children As Young As Two on Film.”

Note. The article quoted above has also been published on a reputable Canadian website, the Jewish Tribune, giving it an added authenticity. Scroll down to: “Jewish Gangsters Raped, Killed Children As Young As 2 On Film. JEWISH CHILD PORN / SNUFF FILM RING DISCOVERED.”

[19]   Michael A. Hoffman, The Truth about the Talmud.  A Documented Exposé of Supremacist Rabbinic Hate Literature. Excerpts from Michael A. Hoffman’s book, “Judaism’s Strange Gods” (2000).

[20]   Dr Lasha Darkmoon, The Sexual Subversion of America (Part 2). An edited abridgement of E. Michael Jones’ 2003 essay, Rabbi Dresner’s Dilemma: Torah v. Ethnos.

[21]   Dr Lasha Darkmoon, Pornography’s Effect on the Brain.

[22]   Bro. Nathaneal Kapner, The Judaic Destruction of Western Culture. 

Freedom of Speech and Radical Press need your help!

DonationAd

RadEditorAT copy 2

Dear Radical Readers and Supporters of Free Speech,

There’s nothing more onerous for me than having to send out appeals for help to cover the costs of running my news site, keeping the lights on, the telephone working (literally!) and some food on the table while putting in countless hours of legal work in order to defend myself against two very serious attacks upon both my person, my family and my website (1. a still-standing sec. 13(1) Canadian Human Rights Commission “hate crime” and 2. a sec. 319(2) Criminal Code of Canada “hate crime”), both brought on by the masonic Jewish lobby group B’nai Brith Canada and aided and abetted by a colluding “mainstream” (aka zionist Jew) controlled media.

The ongoing battle for Canadians to retain their (and our) Charter rights to freedom of speech and expression on the Internet just recently took another heavy hit from the Bolshevik zionist commie commissars here in Canada with the recent ruling in the (yes, you guessed it) Ricardo Warmouse v Fourniers and John Does [FreeDominion.ca] libel and defamation case in Ontario where, once again, the defendants in this lugubrious libel suit were prevented from presenting critical evidence by a judge who obviously is in the pay of these pernicious and persecuting plutocrats who wield such incredibly heinous influence over our judiciary, be it federal or provincial.

What! You haven’t heard about this case in the Post Media News Network? No front page coverage in the National Zionist Post? No blabbering, blathering, brainless ranting gushing forth from that mouthy little zionist Fraser Institute freak who’s always yapping his face off on the Sun News Network harping about “neo-Nazis” and “anti-Semites” and “hate mongers” and “Mooslims” and “Injuns”?  Well, maybe you should take a serious look at what’s gone down in the free speech battleground lately. It will have some very serious negative effects upon how we express ourselves on the net, if, in fact, we’ll even be given the opportunity to comment on events of a political nature any longer. Now that poking fun at politicians and media personalities or anyone for that matter has crossed over into the sinister, convoluted world of “hate & contempt” (another zionist Jew shapeshifting feat), chances are you’ll not be permitted to comment anywhere on news sites or blogs for fear of the Bolshevik cheka kicking down your door or the website owner’s door and charging either of you with a “hate crime” or a libel and defamation suit.

Meanwhile the loathsome lizards who are bound and determined to cut the metaphoric tongue out of your mouth and silence you forever are creaming their jeans knowing that their NWO commie agenda just took another lurch forward here in Canada and that 95% of Canadians are still unaware of what went down in that Ottawa courtroom and that their rights and freedoms just lost a sizeable number of points in the free speech marketplace.

From all appearances Canada’s libel and defamation laws have now been co-opted by the zionist forces, providing a field day for further and endless civil litigation cases. Why it’s a Jewish lawyer’s dream come true! But, as Samuel Roth, a 1930s Jewish author once said in the title of his book, “Jews Must Live” too.

Roth-JewsMustLive 600

If Mark and Connie Fournier, owners of the Free Dominion.ca blogger forum, decide not to appeal this ruling and challenge the overtly treasonous behaviour of the judge who stood in the way of justice then we’re in for a rough ride ahead. It will mean another forum succumbs to the Orwellian control freaks and Canadians are left bereft of their fundamental right to self-expression.

Of course these same deluded and dangerous traitors to Canadian democracy also have their sights set on RadicalPress.com for it’s another beacon of free speech and a citadel of common sense yet to be assailed and silenced in the name of Zion and the New World Order agenda for global totalitarianism. That, in a nutshell, is what the sec. 319(2) charge against me is all about.

Somehow these scheming sons of Satan want to implant their demented, psychopathic agenda for absolute control of freedom of speech into this last remaining federal “hate crime” piece of legislation so that no one will ever dare expose or criticize their brutal regime in Palestine that’s genociding the indigenous populations throughout the Middle East for fear of either imprisonment or hefty fines or both.

This is what I’m up against and it takes time and energy to prepare for the battle ahead. I’m still without a lawyer and I’m not entering that ring for fame and fortune but I have to stand up for what I believe is my God given right as a human being to express my opinions and call to task those who are destroying my country from within. I only hope that other concerned Canadians will stand with me in the days ahead. United we can stop this madness and shift our nation back into its former shape where decency, honesty and fair play will once again hold meaning and hope for us.

If you’re broke like me I would ask that you at least try to pass this message on to others. There’s a PayPal button on the top right hand corner of my website and for further methods of assisting me please click on the link below.

Thanks once again for any help you may be able to offer,

Sincerely

Arthur Topham
Publisher & Editor
The Radical Press
Canada’s Radical News Network
“Digging to the root of the issues since 1998”

======

The battle to retain our inherent right to freedom of speech, both off and on the net, comes with great cost to those on the front lines. Please consider a donation to the Radical Press Free Speech Defence Fund.

Rights and Freedoms Bulletin, Arthur Topham, B’nai Brith & Palestine by Christopher di Armani

Screen Shot 2013-09-16 at 12.24.35 AM
http://Bulletin.RightsAndFreedoms.org

Read the complete Bulletin here:
Rights-and-Freedoms-Bulletin-No-150

Screen Shot 2013-09-15 at 10.31.55 PM

Rights&Free

By
Christopher di Armani
 christopher@diArmani.com

Screen Shot 2013-09-15 at 10.33.55 PM

I’ve been writing about Arthur Topham’s case for a while now, primarily because his case shows the extremes to which our police and government will go to trample on our Right to Freedom of Speech.

With the repeal of Section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act, those who despise our Right to Freedom of Speech, as guaranteed under Section 2 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, have no choice but to use another law that must also be repealed: Section 319(2) of the Criminal Code of Canada. Here is the entire section of law that is currently “dealing with” the so-called public menace known as Arthur Topham and his website, RadicalPress.com.

319. (1)
Every one who, by communicating statements in a public place, incites hatred against any identifiable group where such incitement is likely to lead to a breach of the peace if guilty of
(a) an indictable offence and is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years; or
(b) an offence punishable on summary conviction.

(2)
Every one who, by communicating statements, other than in private conversation, wilfully promotes hatred against and identifiable group is guilty of
(a) an indictable offence and is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years; or
(b) an offence punishable on summary conviction.
(3) No person shall be convicted of an offence under subsection (2)
(a) if he establishes that the statements communicated were true;
(b) if, in good faith, he expressed or attempted to establish by argument an opinion on a religious subject;
(c) if the statements were relevant to any subject of public interest, the discussion of which was for the public benefit, and if on reasonable grounds he believed them to be true; or
(d) if, in good faith, he intended to point out, for the purpose of removal, matters producing or tending to produce feelings of hatred toward an identifiable group in Canada.

Definition of “identifiable group”

318 (4) In this section, “identifiable group” means any section of the public distinguished by colour, race, religion, ethnic origin or sexual orientation.
What is important to note about charges under Section 318 (advocating genocide) and 319 (public incitement of hatred) is that a person can ONLY be charged with these offenses if the Attorney General of the province agrees.

318 (3) & 319 (6)

No proceeding for an offence under subsection (2) shall be instituted without the consent of the Attorney General.

Screen Shot 2013-09-15 at 11.15.11 PM

Arthur Topham expresses his opinions on a variety of social issues, much as I do here in the pages of Canadian Rights and Freedoms Bulletin each week. He has a Right to express those views, regardless of whether or not anyone else on the planet agrees with him. Expressing an opinion that is “approved of ” by the majority should NEVER be the test for Freedom of Speech. Should it be, we may never have learned the Earth is round, for that very thought was considered heretical in its early days.

An unpopular idea, no matter how it is expressed, must not be criminalized. Doing so only guarantees our collective ignorance and bigotry against those who “do not think like us”… whatever that is supposed to mean.

Screen Shot 2013-09-15 at 10.34.13 PM

The greater Vancouver area transit system is run by a consortium called TransLink. This group routinely seeks tax hikes on gasoline to generate revenue for themselves and their spending addiction, but that’s a story for another time and another section of this Bulletin.

TransLink recently made headlines for another reason. They accepted a series of ads that are called controversial and, if B’nai Brith Canada is to be believed, violate Translink’s own policy on acceptable advertising.

A press release issued by B’nai Brith said the following:

August 28, 2013, Toronto – Translink has become the latest platform for anti-Israel agitators by allowing misleading ads to appear on its Vancouver buses, says B’nai Brith Canada.

“There are many reasons why Translink should exercise its corporate discretion and refuse to carry the ads,” commented Frank Dimant, CEO of B’nai Brith Canada. Clearly, the advertisements are misleading and designed to deceive the public as to both the real history of Palestine as well as the facts on the ground today. The ads are designed to lead viewers to conclude that Israel is the culprit – contrary to Translink’s advertising policies against ads which are “demeaning, derogatory, exploitative and unfair comment or representation of a group of persons”.

“The true intent of the ad campaign becomes clear if the groups behind the ads are examined. In fact Translink’s policy requires that the advertisers identity be revealed. Rabid anti-Israel groups including CanPalNet and Independent Jewish Voices have come together as part of their ongoing attempt to Demonize, Denigrate and Delegitimatize the only democratic state in the Middle East – the 3 d’s in the latest evolution of anti-semitism.

“The ad is just one more attempt to literally wipe Israel off the map thereby making common cause with terrorist entities like Hamas or Hezbollah. We encourage members of the community to write to Translink and let them know that such a vicious campaign is not welcome and should be stopped by pulling the ads immediately.”

Screen Shot 2013-09-16 at 12.03.28 AM

That’s an interesting press release, to say the least. As noted on the previous page of this edition of Canadian Rights and Freedoms Bulletin, Quesnel, BC, resident Arthur Topham is currently on trial for allegedly expressing “anti-jewish” thoughts and opinions as is his Right under Section 2 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. For the crime of expressing his personal thoughts and opinions on the internet, Arthur Topham faces charges under Section 319(2) of the Criminal Code of Canada, in what many call a violation of his Charter Section 2 Rights.

Given the B’nai Brith interpretation of the ads currently running on TransLink ad space, a reasonable person might think the individuals and groups behind the ads must also be charged for “wilfully promoting hatred against an identifiable group”, but they are not. Nor should they be.

As Robyn Urback wrote in the National Post,

“The suggestion that criticism of Israel necessarily amounts to hatred of its supporters is a ridiculous position.” If a person or group cannot express his, her or their opinions on public policy and/or current events (as the poor citizens of Vietnam as noted in last week’s Rights and Freedoms Bulletin) then Freedom of Speech simply does not exist.

That Jewish groups are incensed by someone saying things they don’t like is their right, but their crass attempts at censorship only exposes their hypocrisy and double-standards for all to see. It’s perfectly okay for Jewish groups like B’nai Brith to comment on the actions of others, yet the shoe must never be on the other foot?

Let’s not be quite that absurd, okay? If you cannot handle someone saying something you don’t like, you need to grow up.

Freedom of Speech is and must always remain a two-way street.
—–

CANADIAN OUTLAWS: Truth, Christians and Free Speech fall prey to Zionist misfeasance by Arthur Topham

 photo CanadianOutlaws1_zpsbd51ee59.png

 

CANADIAN OUTLAWS: Truth, Christians and Charter of Rights fall prey to Zionist misfeasance 

By Arthur Topham

March 3, 2013

The recent, decision handed down on Wednesday, February 27, 2013 by six of Canada’s Supreme Court justices, in the Saskatchewan (Human Rights Commission) v Whatcott case, was indeed a ‘supreme’ blow to Christians, to freedom of religion and to every individual’s right to freedom of speech in Canada. At the same time, it also was a remarkably clandestine victory for the foreign Zionist-Jew lobby groups such as B’nai Brith Canada, the Canadian Jewish Congress, and the Canadian Council for Israel and Jewish Advocacy (CIJA); all of whom reflect, represent and condone, in unabashed fashion, the principles and policies of the Zionist state of Israel, over and above the traditional rule of law that has been the hallmark of Canadian jurisprudence from its earliest beginnings.

On top of this victorious legal coup that the vast majority of Canadians remain either ignorant of or in denial of, there are the added collaborating players in this long-range agenda to subvert and mould Canada’s judiciary into a type more in keeping with that of the U.S.A’s; one which, in recent years, has become permeated by their Jewish lobby groups to such an extent that they’ve effectively emasculated the US legal system by introducing their own brand of Jewish Noahide laws into American jurisprudence. These Noahide laws are, in fact, ones that stem from the ancient writings of the Jewish Talmud; a horrendously hoary and convoluted compilation of endless sophistry and intellectual meanderings that attempt to cover the full gamut of possible mental masterbation on any conceivable topic capable of debate, all of which boggles the mind and taxes the heart and soul of anyone who is able to locate and delve into the bottomless pit of arcane, abstruse, macabre deliberations found therein.

It is my contention, based upon all recent research and extrapolation, that this same clandestine, Fifth Column Zionist-instigated seditious process is, and has been, occurring here in Canada since the inception of our nation’s “hate speech laws” that, coincidentally, began to gain ascendency in Canada’s house of justice back in the late 1960’s when the major Jewish lobby groups first began to amalgamate and initiate this calculated, step by step, surreptitious program of incremental changes to Canada’s legal system; one that would eventually see the switch over from former Christian democratic principles of freedom of speech to those of the Talmudic Jewish Noahide laws under which Jewry has operated over the past two millennia.  It is also my added contention that these subtle changes have been, and are being, spearheaded by those very justices of the Supreme Court of Canada who hold duel citizenship with the state of Israel and whose ultimate allegiance, I strongly allege, is first and foremost to that foreign nation.

Compounding and exacerbating this traitorous intent to corrupt and debase Canada’s legal system via “hate crime legislation” is the growing realization by many Canadians that our so-called “independent” media is, in fact, totally controlled, editorially and otherwise, by this same self-serving Zionist Jew consortium and that these media monopolists, along with their line of sycophantic, sayanim journalists and talking heads, are the major propaganda force behind this plot to subvert the Canadian justice system.

Most Canadians who have not been asleep at the wheel politically are now fully cognizant of the fact that the Harper Conservative government is the key to the success of these Zionist “hate crime” operatives and their eventual triumph in binding the mouths and minds of Canadians so that any and all criticism of their planned take-over of the country will not be openly discussed, either in the print media, television or on the Internet. Their arsenal of epithets stands ready 24/7 to support any smear & fear campaign necessary to belittle and slander and denigrate those who show any indication of not bowing down in obeisance to their treasonous scheme to dismantle and re-create our former legal system so as to have it fit harmoniously with all the other nations that have also been infiltrated by these same self-chosen zealots.

The whole of the homosexual agenda is but one of the ruses that these lobbyists use in order to divide, confuse and conquer their opponents and justify, via their human rights commissions, tribunals and their Supreme Court double-agents, the introduction of more and more repressive anti-democratic “hate speech” laws. These tactics, for those who have studied the Zionist’s modus operandi to any degree, are par for the course. The crucial thing for them is to use others rather than come straight out and say we’re bringing in all these repressive, Orwellian laws because we don’t want Canadians discussing and debating our ideology, our motives or our agenda; one that includes enslaving and punishing anyone who steps out of line and beyond that the total destruction of the Christian religion as we now know it.

There is, on top of all these seemingly inexplicable occurrences, a vital question that needs to asked and addressed with respect to the inordinate number of Zionist, duel-citizenship Jewish justices who have somehow wended their way upwards to the apex of Canada’s judicial system and are now literally in positions of supreme power and control with respect to influencing both our Constitution and our Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

Given that Canada is noted world wide for being a proactive, multicultural nation; one that welcomes immigrants from around the world to its shores and touts itself as being an open, free and culturally diverse society, the blatant imbalance that we are witnessing today in the ethnic composition of our Supreme Court justices is beyond question a problem in dire need of explanation.

Were we, as a nation, to give equal opportunity and consideration to the various visible minorities that make up our country’s population then this ought to be reflected in the composition of those who sit in judgement at the top of our federal judicial system.

Knowing that our First Nations population is the largest minority group in Canada it behooves all Canadians to ask the obvious: why do we not have a First Nations justice sitting in on our supreme court? Given that this nation was formed, literally, from the soil of the original people’s land and also given that the First Nations people constitute the largest group in the Canadian population matrix does it not make sense that when it comes to representing their interests that someone from their ranks ought to be a member of this august group of supreme court justices?

Next in line is our Chinese-Canadian population topping the list as the largest visible minority in Canada and again the obvious question is: why do we not have a Chinese-Canadian justice sitting in the SCC?

Next in line we have a very large South Asian population followed by an equally large black population. Where are the South Asian and the Black supreme court justices?

Finally, getting to the crux of this perplexing situation, as we go down the scale of relative population demographics  we come to the ethnic Jewish population in Canada which, according to the Jewish Virtual Library, in 2010 numbered 375,000 in population, ranking somewhere in the neighbourhood of 25th in terms of group size and comprising, out of a total population of 33,890,000 Canadians, 1.1% of Canada’s total population. Yet, for their relatively small numbers in terms of percentages they now hold 4 out of 9 positions on Canada’s Supreme Court. That works out to 44.4% of Canada’s supreme court justices somehow stemming from 1.1 % of the country’s total population. If common sense cannot tell people that there is a glaring discrepancy here then something surely is wrong in the way that Canadians view the make-up of their nation’s highest court.  No amount of intellectual verbiage can explain why this is so without getting into the fundamental question of what the real reasons are for this most obvious of imbalances wherein we have a preponderance of duel-citizen Jewish justices sitting and deliberating the vital questions currently being discussed in this brief essay.

Of course the immediate reaction from the Zionist lobbies is to reach up their proverbial sleeve and pull out their “anti-Semitic” and “hate speech” cards and flash them across the nation via their controlled media in typical fashion whenever their power base is questioned or threatened. Then will follow their sophistry and rhetoric emanating from the academics and talking heads arguing that this blatant discrepancy is simply due to the fact that Jewish lawyers are the most intelligent, experienced and therefore qualified of all of Canada’s lawyers and, like the cream atop the cow’s milk, they naturally rise up to those positions of eminence and power.

As the kids would say, “Yah, sure.”

To conclude, it cannot be stressed or repeated enough that we either have free speech or we have controlled speech where Big Brother takes control of our conscience and our mind and leaves us as automatons and slaves to do their bidding and those who now sit in judgement over our collective rights , due to their recent actions in the Whatcott case, must be treated with the utmost suspicion and their motives fully analyzed.

The time to act on these concerns is yesterday. Tomorrow may be too late.

The SCC Puppets

I present below the figures of the three Ashkenazi Zionists who have, along with their controllers in Tel Aviv and elsewhere, and the other three Shabbez Goi justices, perpetrated this seditious act of attempting to twist the truth and our human right to freedom of speech into some form of kosher, Zionist fritter all the better to fragment and confuse the people of Canada so as to lure our nation further astray into the nightmare that awaits the world should Zionism ever gain full control over independent nation states.

It must also be adamantly born in mind as well that the fact that I am presenting and focusing on these three individuals is absolutely not to be misconstrued as having excused the other three protagonists in this deceptive legal drama. The primary purpose here is accent the Jewish lobby in Canad and its unsavory effect upon Canada’s legal system. It goes without saying that the other three justices have, for whatever reasons, also consented to this agenda and ought to be removed from their positions along with the three Zionist duel-citizen justices in question here.

McLachlin photo McLachlincopy_zps96a077d6.png

With respect to Canada’s current Madam Chief Justice McLachlin it is also relevant and fitting that the following quote by Jason Moscovitz of the CBC be mentioned here as it is most relevant to an understanding of the mindset of these six judicial side-kicks when it comes to our right to freedom of speech.  Jason Moscovitz states: “Of all the attributes she brings to the high court, there is one that sticks out. Many legal experts say she does not consider the Charter of Rights to be necessarily sacred.” [Jason Moscovitz CBC Date: 991103 Time: 22:00:00 ET – 22:26:00 ET]

AbellaFlag photo abellaFlag_zpsbf55ffb4.png

While still in her twenties SCC Abella was appointed a member of the Human Rights Commission of Ontario. Her husband, Irving Abella, is the J. Richard Shiff Professor of Canadian Jewish Studies at York University in Toronto and a past president of the Canadian Jewish Congress, one of the leading “hate speech law” lobby groups in Canada.

SCC Justice Abella is on the International Board of the Hebrew University, a member of the United States Holocaust Museum’s Committee on Conscience (again, pushing the 6 million lies of the Zionists that have become since WWII one of the principal pillars supporting all of their criminal actions since that time).

The president (Canadian Section) of the International Commission of Jurists, cited her as one whose “entire life has revolved around the cause of human rights… She has shaped Canadian policy in equality rights, and…has also had a profound impact on human rights law and policy outside Canada.” The precise manner in HOW SCC has “shaped Canadian policy in equality rights” is now fairly apparent given her complicity in this recent and deplorable attack upon Canada’s unquestionable right to freedom of speech.

SCC Justice Abella also served as a commissioner on the Ontario Human Rights Commission. Again, those who have been complicit in the actions of the human “rights” commissions here in Canada have revealed their motives clearly enough over the past decade and longer and have lost credibility in the eyes of the rest of the 98% of Canada who do not want to have their rights tampered with to satisfy the spurious and fraudulent false front arguments of special minority groups.

FishFlag photo FishFlag_zps0946efd9.png

True to his name there’s definitely something “fishy” about this lastest SCC decision.

 

RothsteinFlag photo RothsteinFlag_zps2256d32f.png

SCC Justice Rothstein has served as an adjudicator under the Manitoba Human Rights Act from 1978 to 1983 and as a member of the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal from 1986 to 1992. He has also held many other offices or appointments connected to the Manitoba Human Rights Act and the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal.

So what have people like Marshall Rothstein learned from all of their involvement in harassing and vilifying and criminalizing Canadians for having exercised their God-given right to freedom of expression and speech? By all appearances he’s learned that the manipulation of the law,when it is being supported by a Fifth Column media and a host of complicit, compromised politicians under the sway of the Zionist lobby, is relatively easy to accomplish and virtually a fait accompli.

———

Radical Press Legal Update #7

NewLegalUpdateLogo-700

notice4RP

Radical Press Legal Update #7

Radical Press Legal Update #7

Yesterday’s  Bail  Hearing was a three hour session in the Quesnel Court house.

The regular Judge who has been presiding over the various applications thus far was unable to attend and instead we had a female Judge by the name of M. Church who heard the application.

Crown of course had first kick at the cat and Crown Council Jennifer Johnston opened her remarks by giving Judge Church a brief overview of the case which included her reasons for why Crown has still not provided my lawyer with full disclosure in the case.

According to CC Johnston the period from my initial arrest on May 16, 2012 until October 9, 2012 had proven to be an insufficient time period in order to get enough evidence together so that an Indictment could be handed down by the October 9 deadline and that, apparently, somehow justified not providing Mr. Christie with full disclosure.

After the October 9 deadline I was no longer under the original bail conditions that restricted me from posting on my website although for some odd reason I didn’t become aware of this fact until close to 3 weeks after the fact .

The Crown eventually got their sworn information on November 5, 2012 and notified my lawyer that there would be a call date set for Nov. 6 where I was to appear in court. That date was subsequently changed to the 8th of November as Doug Christie was out in Saskatchewan attending to another case and couldn’t appear via telephone on the 6th. It was Crown’s letter to Mr. Christie on Nov. 5th that also informed him that Crown had asked for an endorsed warrant that would allow Crown to have all of the original bail conditions reinstated.

When I appeared on November 8, 2012 the Judge listened to both sides of the arguments and ruled that only some of the original conditions would remain i.e., those concerning my order not to have any contact with the two knaves  who laid the alleged complaint to the RCMP and also the cops hanging on to my illegally stolen firearms. At the same time he set a new date of December 13, 2012 when Mr. Christie could be in court to represent me and Crown would be given the opportunity to argue for the reinstatement of the additional restrictions originally imposed on me by Det – Cst Terry Wilson on the day I got out of jail.

Of course December 13, 2012 proved to be bad timing weather wise and my lawyer was unable to fly into Quesnel that day so again a decision on Crown’s application was delayed for another week which brought it up to December 19, 2012 which was yesterday.

After running through that time line Crown then began their argument for wanting to reinstate the additional Orwellian restraints that would prohibit me from posting articles anywhere on the Internet available to the general public or to allow anyone else to post on any of my other websites that were owned by me.

Just prior to commencing her argument Crown Council Jennifer Johnston told Judge Church that unfortunately she hadn’t been able to provide Mr. Christie with the big fat 1″ thick bail disclosure document because she had been informed by Det – Cst Terry Wilson that when the Indictment was handed down the National Post had published an article on the case which contained statements that the reporter had gleaned from another website called FreeDominion.ca. Those statements were from what is called a “Warned” statement which is considered by the courts to be part of disclosure and therefore confidential information that is not supposed to be given out to the public. The Warned statement was a digital voice recording that Det – Cst Terry Wilson had made of his conversation with me just prior to my release from jail on May 16, 2012. Why IT was given to my lawyer when all the other disclosure documents are still being withheld by Crown is still a mystery to both myself and Mr. Christie but in the case of this particular document when I received a copy of it I didn’t realize it was confidential and had so I had shared it with an associate in a private email and unbeknownst to myself failed to notify them that it was confidential.

Anyhow a couple of quotes were taken from it and posted in the National Post and that was the big reason, according to CC Jennifer Johnston why she was refusing to divulge any more disclosure materials to Mr. Christie. This issue had come up on Dec. 13 when Crown was arguing before Judge Morgan that a second application had been filed regarding the matter of the illegal disclosure but no agreement could be found at the time and Mr. Christie had refused to agree to it.

At this point Crown told Judge Church that she would be willing to let Mr. Christie take a look at the bail disclosure document even though Crown’s application had not be resolved but that he would have to give it back at the end of the hearing! All of this was the typical Catch-22 scenarios that have been playing out since day one of this charade.

The Judge obviously knew that Mr. Christie couldn’t be expected to argue against something he hadn’t even seen so after a bit of discussion it was agreed that Crown would give Mr. Christie the disclosure document and a short 15 minute recess would be called so that he and I would have an opportunity to take a look at what Crown was planning to use in their argument for reinstating the original harsh bail conditions on me.

It only took about 5 minutes of perusing the document to realize what was going to be the Crown’s argument and we quickly went back and let the clerk know that the recess should end as soon as possible and court resume. Mr. Christie was well aware of the time constraints and needed every minute for his arguments.

Court resumed and Crown Council Johnston began her argument that I had been publishing all these articles, updates, etc. since November 2, 2012 (legally, mind you) and then proceeded to go through individual posts selecting various quotes to back up her position. It was the standard Zionist double-speak argument that posts were continuing to spread hate toward the Jews and Zionists and were attacking unfairly Det -Cst Terry Wilson and his partner-in-crime Cst Normandie Levas and thus possibly endangering their safety!

This went on until about 3 p.m. when she finally concluded her remarks and a break was taken before Mr. Christie was given time to present his arguments.

The issue of the leaked disclosure was addressed first and Mr. Christie told that Judge that he would have no problem with the Court issuing an Order stating that in future neither he nor myself would disclose any confidential information to any third parties not directly connected to the case and definitely not for publication.

Doug then commenced his argument with a bountiful supply of case law references and quickly outlined for the Judge some precedents which included the legal right for publishers and writers to criticize both Jews and Zionists citing articles in various mainstream publications like the New York Times and other Zionist controlled media. His point being that no particular group is exempt from criticism and that includes Jews or those who support political Zionism. Regarding my criticisms of the RCMP he also pointed out to the court that the RCMP were certainly not above criticism and given their public image of late he didn’t feel Crown’s argument in this regard was worthy of consideration.

He also made it crystal clear that what Crown was attempting to do flew in the face of any and all statutes currently within the Canadian legal system. By that I mean Crown’s attempt to curtail my Charter Rights to freedom of expression and access to the Internet prior to my case being heard in a court of law and a decision being handed down as to whether or not I did in fact publish materials that were ultimately deemed to be “willful promotion of hatred” as contained in sec. 319(2) of the Canadian Criminal Code.

To a priori assume that whatever I am publishing is “hatred” and then ask the court to impose such severe curtailments upon my Charter rights prior to being tried is verboten and should not be considered as a reasonable argument.

During Crown’s argument CC Johnston had cited the Basi-Virk Trial (of all trials!) to back up some of her comments regarding the need to protect witnesses. In this instances she was trying to correlate my Warned statement conversation with Det – Cst Terry Wilson with that of secondary witnesses in the Basi-Verk case. When Doug came to this he quickly pointed out to the Judge the vast difference between witness evidence by anonymous third parties and statements directly given to the arresting officer by the accused as was the case in point regarding Crown’s argument.

One by one Mr. Christie countered Crown Council’s arguments and this went on until around 4:15 p.m. at which time Mr. Christie concluded his remarks by informing the Judge that he had a plane to catch before 5 p.m. and that he would have to stop. Doug asked me at this point to call the airport to confirm the exact time when the plane was leaving so I had to leave the court room for about five minutes.

While I was gone Crown apparently tried to refute all of Doug’s arguments and told the Judge that because I was charged with a “Hate” crime that Crown could then basically impose whatever restrictions they wanted to on me. The Judge apparently wasn’t convinced and just when I got back into the court room I heard her telling Crown and Defence that she would be considering the arguments and submitting a request to another body (not sure which one at this point) for further clarification come early January and then after that she would notify Crown and Defence of her decision.

So basically there will be no further bail conditions imposed on myself until January of 2013 at the earliest. We quickly packed up our things and drove Doug out to the airport where he bid us a fond fair well.

For now we will finally have a couple of weeks grace in order to relax a bit and enjoy the Christmas season.

——–

NOTE: Out of necessity I am forced to ask for financial assistance in this ongoing battle with the censors. Due to the fact that the Crown is refusing to give the required disclosure to my lawyer I am not able to furnish legal aid with the required documents that they demand before looking at whether or not I might qualify for legal financial assistance. This leaves me in the unenviable position of having to rely solely upon donations to pay for my legal expenses. The airfare alone yesterday for my lawyer to appear in court in Quesnel to defend me against these false charges was $1,050.00 return and given my minimal monthly pension it’s virtually impossible for me to cover these expenses.
As such I would once again implore readers to give serious consideration to helping me out by either sending a donation via PayPal using either a PayPal account or a credit card or else sending a cheque or Money Order to me via snail mail at the following postal address. Cash of course also works.
Arthur Topham
4633 Barkerville Highway
Quesnel, B.C.
Canada
V2J 6T8
To access my PayPal button please go to either the Home Page at http://www.radicalpress.com or my blog http://www.quesnelcariboosentinel.com The PayPal button is up on the right hand corner of the Home Page on either site.
Sincerely,
Arthur Topham
Pub/Ed
The Radical Press

 

 

 

 

 

B’nai Brith, ADL, Child Porn, Regina and Arthur Topham by Arthur Topham

B’nai Brith, ADL, Child Porn, Regina and Arthur Topham

B’nai Brith, ADL, Child Porn, Regina and Arthur Topham

by 

Arthur Topham

December 17, 2012

From the very beginning of my longstanding legal battle with B’nai Brith Canada and the International Jewish Lobby it has been my intention to point a fierce yet truthful finger at World Jewry: the primary purpose being to bring to the forefront for Canadians the true identity and purpose of these front organizations that the Zionists have set up over the past couple of centuries to deceive the gullible goyim (non-Jews) on multiple levels.

A prime example of how, like clockwork, Zionists inevitably resort to the same tactics over and over, is the recent behaviour by the Crown in my upcoming sec. 319(2) CCC “Hate Crime” case involving B’nai Brith Canada and the RCMP’s Det-Cst Terry Wilson of the “BC HATE CRIME TEAM”.

In my last Legal Update #6 published on December 14, 2012 reference was made to the fact that I would publish an article related to the subject of this incident that took place (again) during my last court appearance on December 13, 2012).

Since the onset of the false allegations brought on by Agent Z and Agent Y of B’nai Brith Canada that led to my arrest on May 16, 2012 the Crown has done its damnedest to portray me in a false and negatively perverse light.

Beginning with my first appearance in the Quesnel court room Crown Council Jennifer Johnston immediately began her vilification of my person by resorting to “case law” (examples from former court cases used as precedents that purported prove similar intent and purpose) that equated the cases referenced by her to my own situation with respect to the articles which I have posted on RadicalPress.com.

The “case” in point here being the Crown’s feeble and malicious attempt to suggest to the presiding Judge that articles published on RadicalPress.com are of the same revulsive caliber as photographs and videos of child pornography and sexual abuse that are illegally posted on the Internet and exchanged between perverts via email and that when it comes to any consideration on the part of the Judge as to the degree and severity of bail conditions that ought to be imposed upon me during the course of this bolshevik show trial that this fallacious argument on Crown’s part ought to be given serious consideration so that I would not be permitted to continue to post anything further on the website or possibly even be permitted to email friends and associates.

This, dear lover of freedom of speech, is the degree of chutzpah (arrogance) and deception which permeates not only the mindset of the Jewish lobbies around the world but also that supposedly impartial, independent and august body within Canada’s judicial system (the Crown) which is currently doing the bidding of this foreign agent of Israel – B’nai Brith Canada.

One of the hallmarks of Zionist thinking is to turn whatever truth exists upon its head and then attempt to portray the actual perpetrator of a crime as the innocent victim and nowhere will you find a better example than in the case of sexual perversion, child pornography, deviancy of all types and the secretive masonic order known to the world as B’nai Brith.

I might add too at this point that it’s a known fact, boldly and unabashedly announced by the perpetrators themselves, that the global porn industry was initiated by and has been controlled by Jews since the very beginning. Anyone doubting this need only type into the Google search engine the aforementioned topic and they will find this simple fact out for themselves.

In my own case because of these false allegations made against my person, my life’s work and Truth itself I will site two precedent setting cases that show both the hypocrisy and the deceit that this purportedly “benevolent Jewish society” has projected upon the public’s perception via their controlled media over the past century.

The first is a recent incident that actually took place at the time when I was battling with the Canadian Human Rights Act’s sec. 13(1) complaint that Agent Z and the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada had filed against me back in 2007.

During the course of that long and protracted exchange of arguments and motions that eventually led to a decision by the Canadian Human Rights Commission to uphold and lend credence to the complaint; one which eventually moved the case into the hands of the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal (another communist/zionist style, quasi-judicial body of appointed Zionists doing the bidding of their taskmasters from Israel) B’nai Brith’s touted moral superiority and unblemished integrity suffered a serious blow when one of their former Canadian directors of B’nai Brith Quebec, Bill Surkis, was arrested and charged on May 29, 2009 with possession of 86 videos containing close to nine hours of footage showing men engaged in sexual abuse of under children between the ages of six and fourteen. On top of the videos were an additional 153 photos also showing children being abused.

To add insult to injury Surkis’s lawyer Steven Slimovich (no pun intended!) at first attempted to convince the Crown that his client had all this porn on his computer for “The purpose of his viewing the child pornography material [in order] to educate himself on the topic of child pornography” so that afterwards he would be able to “go into schools and give lectures on people abusing people.”! That, I suggest, is the sort of chutzpah one continually confronts whenever this touted “benevolent” front organization gets caught with its pants down.

Of course even the Crown in this instance couldn’t pretend to fall for such a scam and they had to prosecute Surkis but given the severity of the charges: all three – possessing, accessing and distributing of child pornography – each carrying a maximum penalty on conviction of 10 years in prison, the final outcome of the trial which included plea bargaining to drop the “distributing child pornography” charge was one that showed the powerful influence of the Jewish lobby when it comes to protecting one of their own.

Out of a total of possibly 30 years imprisonment for the three initial charges what did this former registered lobbyist and Quebec Regional Director of B’nai Brith Canada, board chairman for the Holocaust Memorial Museum and Academic Dean of John Abbott College for 22 years receive as punishment for his crimes?  Why a grand total of 45 days in jail to be served on weekends, the minimum sentencing allowed under the law!

Oi veh is all I can say!

Yet in my own case, where a conviction for a said sec. 319(2) CCC  “Hate Crime” carries a maximum 2 year sentence, do you think that were the Crown to win their case that they would sentence me to say a relatively similar punishment of 5 to 10 days in jail to be served on weekends? Fat chance!

And so it’s fairly evident by now, given Crown Council Jennifer Johnston’s repeated references to Judge Morgan directly associating RadicalPress.com’s articles with child pornography, that her motive is designed to convince the Judge that extremely severe restrictions are justified and must be imposed upon me to prohibit me from writing and publishing any further (pornographic?) articles in my own defence or providing updated information to my long list of supporters and donors who are helping me (and themselves) in this battle to retain my Charter right to freedom of speech on the Internet.

One final irksome comment in this regard. Sturkis’ lawyer Slimovich also did his best to insure that his client, a “stellar” member of his Jewish community, who he stated was a “staunch individual” who “stood up for what is right” would not lose his privilege of retaining his home computer so that he could “continue to serve” his community. Whether he gained that right I was at this point unable to determine.

The second example is one that I will touch upon only briefly but will furnish readers with an url to a website where they can read about it in depth so as to understand the duration of time that has passed since this “benevolent” charity called B’nai Brith that has been fronting as a philanthropy organization for the past hundred years and longer first began their attempts at covering the blood soaked tracks of their membership via the use of their mainstream media propaganda mechanisms using both print and television to gain their dubious ends.

Today the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) of B’nai Brith is the foremost American Jewish watch dog and lobbyist for the state of Israel and for support of the Zionist ideology that buttresses said state’s political doctrines. Its influence in the USA is notoriously well known and its victims are legion since its inception back in the year 1913. The following “case” exposes the history behind why B’nai Brith created the ADL in the first place and it serves as yet another reminder of what this essay is trying to do, i.e. expose B’nai Brith’s true identity and its historic links with pedophelia.

Back in 1913 the United States of America witnessed a rather grizzly murder trial involving a Jew by the name of Leo M. Frank who was the owner of a sweat shop Pencil Company that employed young girls. Leo M. Frank was also president of the Atlanta, Georgia, Gate City [masonic] Lodge 144 Chapter of B’nai B’rith which had about 500 members. The controversy surrounding his sensational trial and subsequent conviction has been ongoing with the ADL still attempting to exonerate the pedophile sex killer as late as 1986.

I highly suggest that readers take a look at the website which exposes all the machinations surrounding this historic trial. It can be found at the following url: http://www.leofrank.org/introduction-to-leo-frank/

I believe these two examples given in this essay are reason enough to challenge Crown Council Jennifer Johnston’s erroneous assertions that she is putting forth in court which suggest that my work and the information contained on RadicalPress.com are somehow related to pedophilia and child pornography when the facts suggest that those who were involved in laying the complaint against me are the ones who ought to be ashamed and embarrassed by the ongoing behaviour of their own members in this highly suspect and shady Jewish lobby organization that is aggressively pursuing its agenda of supporting these so-called “Hate Crimes” in order to silence any criticism of themselves or of the state of Israel and its ideology of Zionism.

I’m sure there will be more to report on this issue as the trial unfolds.

—–