CANADIAN OUTLAWS: Truth, Christians and Free Speech fall prey to Zionist misfeasance by Arthur Topham

 photo CanadianOutlaws1_zpsbd51ee59.png

 

CANADIAN OUTLAWS: Truth, Christians and Charter of Rights fall prey to Zionist misfeasance 

By Arthur Topham

March 3, 2013

The recent, decision handed down on Wednesday, February 27, 2013 by six of Canada’s Supreme Court justices, in the Saskatchewan (Human Rights Commission) v Whatcott case, was indeed a ‘supreme’ blow to Christians, to freedom of religion and to every individual’s right to freedom of speech in Canada. At the same time, it also was a remarkably clandestine victory for the foreign Zionist-Jew lobby groups such as B’nai Brith Canada, the Canadian Jewish Congress, and the Canadian Council for Israel and Jewish Advocacy (CIJA); all of whom reflect, represent and condone, in unabashed fashion, the principles and policies of the Zionist state of Israel, over and above the traditional rule of law that has been the hallmark of Canadian jurisprudence from its earliest beginnings.

On top of this victorious legal coup that the vast majority of Canadians remain either ignorant of or in denial of, there are the added collaborating players in this long-range agenda to subvert and mould Canada’s judiciary into a type more in keeping with that of the U.S.A’s; one which, in recent years, has become permeated by their Jewish lobby groups to such an extent that they’ve effectively emasculated the US legal system by introducing their own brand of Jewish Noahide laws into American jurisprudence. These Noahide laws are, in fact, ones that stem from the ancient writings of the Jewish Talmud; a horrendously hoary and convoluted compilation of endless sophistry and intellectual meanderings that attempt to cover the full gamut of possible mental masterbation on any conceivable topic capable of debate, all of which boggles the mind and taxes the heart and soul of anyone who is able to locate and delve into the bottomless pit of arcane, abstruse, macabre deliberations found therein.

It is my contention, based upon all recent research and extrapolation, that this same clandestine, Fifth Column Zionist-instigated seditious process is, and has been, occurring here in Canada since the inception of our nation’s “hate speech laws” that, coincidentally, began to gain ascendency in Canada’s house of justice back in the late 1960′s when the major Jewish lobby groups first began to amalgamate and initiate this calculated, step by step, surreptitious program of incremental changes to Canada’s legal system; one that would eventually see the switch over from former Christian democratic principles of freedom of speech to those of the Talmudic Jewish Noahide laws under which Jewry has operated over the past two millennia.  It is also my added contention that these subtle changes have been, and are being, spearheaded by those very justices of the Supreme Court of Canada who hold duel citizenship with the state of Israel and whose ultimate allegiance, I strongly allege, is first and foremost to that foreign nation.

Compounding and exacerbating this traitorous intent to corrupt and debase Canada’s legal system via “hate crime legislation” is the growing realization by many Canadians that our so-called “independent” media is, in fact, totally controlled, editorially and otherwise, by this same self-serving Zionist Jew consortium and that these media monopolists, along with their line of sycophantic, sayanim journalists and talking heads, are the major propaganda force behind this plot to subvert the Canadian justice system.

Most Canadians who have not been asleep at the wheel politically are now fully cognizant of the fact that the Harper Conservative government is the key to the success of these Zionist “hate crime” operatives and their eventual triumph in binding the mouths and minds of Canadians so that any and all criticism of their planned take-over of the country will not be openly discussed, either in the print media, television or on the Internet. Their arsenal of epithets stands ready 24/7 to support any smear & fear campaign necessary to belittle and slander and denigrate those who show any indication of not bowing down in obeisance to their treasonous scheme to dismantle and re-create our former legal system so as to have it fit harmoniously with all the other nations that have also been infiltrated by these same self-chosen zealots.

The whole of the homosexual agenda is but one of the ruses that these lobbyists use in order to divide, confuse and conquer their opponents and justify, via their human rights commissions, tribunals and their Supreme Court double-agents, the introduction of more and more repressive anti-democratic “hate speech” laws. These tactics, for those who have studied the Zionist’s modus operandi to any degree, are par for the course. The crucial thing for them is to use others rather than come straight out and say we’re bringing in all these repressive, Orwellian laws because we don’t want Canadians discussing and debating our ideology, our motives or our agenda; one that includes enslaving and punishing anyone who steps out of line and beyond that the total destruction of the Christian religion as we now know it.

There is, on top of all these seemingly inexplicable occurrences, a vital question that needs to asked and addressed with respect to the inordinate number of Zionist, duel-citizenship Jewish justices who have somehow wended their way upwards to the apex of Canada’s judicial system and are now literally in positions of supreme power and control with respect to influencing both our Constitution and our Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

Given that Canada is noted world wide for being a proactive, multicultural nation; one that welcomes immigrants from around the world to its shores and touts itself as being an open, free and culturally diverse society, the blatant imbalance that we are witnessing today in the ethnic composition of our Supreme Court justices is beyond question a problem in dire need of explanation.

Were we, as a nation, to give equal opportunity and consideration to the various visible minorities that make up our country’s population then this ought to be reflected in the composition of those who sit in judgement at the top of our federal judicial system.

Knowing that our First Nations population is the largest minority group in Canada it behooves all Canadians to ask the obvious: why do we not have a First Nations justice sitting in on our supreme court? Given that this nation was formed, literally, from the soil of the original people’s land and also given that the First Nations people constitute the largest group in the Canadian population matrix does it not make sense that when it comes to representing their interests that someone from their ranks ought to be a member of this august group of supreme court justices?

Next in line is our Chinese-Canadian population topping the list as the largest visible minority in Canada and again the obvious question is: why do we not have a Chinese-Canadian justice sitting in the SCC?

Next in line we have a very large South Asian population followed by an equally large black population. Where are the South Asian and the Black supreme court justices?

Finally, getting to the crux of this perplexing situation, as we go down the scale of relative population demographics  we come to the ethnic Jewish population in Canada which, according to the Jewish Virtual Library, in 2010 numbered 375,000 in population, ranking somewhere in the neighbourhood of 25th in terms of group size and comprising, out of a total population of 33,890,000 Canadians, 1.1% of Canada’s total population. Yet, for their relatively small numbers in terms of percentages they now hold 4 out of 9 positions on Canada’s Supreme Court. That works out to 44.4% of Canada’s supreme court justices somehow stemming from 1.1 % of the country’s total population. If common sense cannot tell people that there is a glaring discrepancy here then something surely is wrong in the way that Canadians view the make-up of their nation’s highest court.  No amount of intellectual verbiage can explain why this is so without getting into the fundamental question of what the real reasons are for this most obvious of imbalances wherein we have a preponderance of duel-citizen Jewish justices sitting and deliberating the vital questions currently being discussed in this brief essay.

Of course the immediate reaction from the Zionist lobbies is to reach up their proverbial sleeve and pull out their “anti-Semitic” and “hate speech” cards and flash them across the nation via their controlled media in typical fashion whenever their power base is questioned or threatened. Then will follow their sophistry and rhetoric emanating from the academics and talking heads arguing that this blatant discrepancy is simply due to the fact that Jewish lawyers are the most intelligent, experienced and therefore qualified of all of Canada’s lawyers and, like the cream atop the cow’s milk, they naturally rise up to those positions of eminence and power.

As the kids would say, “Yah, sure.”

To conclude, it cannot be stressed or repeated enough that we either have free speech or we have controlled speech where Big Brother takes control of our conscience and our mind and leaves us as automatons and slaves to do their bidding and those who now sit in judgement over our collective rights , due to their recent actions in the Whatcott case, must be treated with the utmost suspicion and their motives fully analyzed.

The time to act on these concerns is yesterday. Tomorrow may be too late.

The SCC Puppets

I present below the figures of the three Ashkenazi Zionists who have, along with their controllers in Tel Aviv and elsewhere, and the other three Shabbez Goi justices, perpetrated this seditious act of attempting to twist the truth and our human right to freedom of speech into some form of kosher, Zionist fritter all the better to fragment and confuse the people of Canada so as to lure our nation further astray into the nightmare that awaits the world should Zionism ever gain full control over independent nation states.

It must also be adamantly born in mind as well that the fact that I am presenting and focusing on these three individuals is absolutely not to be misconstrued as having excused the other three protagonists in this deceptive legal drama. The primary purpose here is accent the Jewish lobby in Canad and its unsavory effect upon Canada’s legal system. It goes without saying that the other three justices have, for whatever reasons, also consented to this agenda and ought to be removed from their positions along with the three Zionist duel-citizen justices in question here.

McLachlin photo McLachlincopy_zps96a077d6.png

With respect to Canada’s current Madam Chief Justice McLachlin it is also relevant and fitting that the following quote by Jason Moscovitz of the CBC be mentioned here as it is most relevant to an understanding of the mindset of these six judicial side-kicks when it comes to our right to freedom of speech.  Jason Moscovitz states: “Of all the attributes she brings to the high court, there is one that sticks out. Many legal experts say she does not consider the Charter of Rights to be necessarily sacred.” [Jason Moscovitz CBC Date: 991103 Time: 22:00:00 ET - 22:26:00 ET]

AbellaFlag photo abellaFlag_zpsbf55ffb4.png

While still in her twenties SCC Abella was appointed a member of the Human Rights Commission of Ontario. Her husband, Irving Abella, is the J. Richard Shiff Professor of Canadian Jewish Studies at York University in Toronto and a past president of the Canadian Jewish Congress, one of the leading “hate speech law” lobby groups in Canada.

SCC Justice Abella is on the International Board of the Hebrew University, a member of the United States Holocaust Museum’s Committee on Conscience (again, pushing the 6 million lies of the Zionists that have become since WWII one of the principal pillars supporting all of their criminal actions since that time).

The president (Canadian Section) of the International Commission of Jurists, cited her as one whose “entire life has revolved around the cause of human rights… She has shaped Canadian policy in equality rights, and…has also had a profound impact on human rights law and policy outside Canada.” The precise manner in HOW SCC has “shaped Canadian policy in equality rights” is now fairly apparent given her complicity in this recent and deplorable attack upon Canada’s unquestionable right to freedom of speech.

SCC Justice Abella also served as a commissioner on the Ontario Human Rights Commission. Again, those who have been complicit in the actions of the human “rights” commissions here in Canada have revealed their motives clearly enough over the past decade and longer and have lost credibility in the eyes of the rest of the 98% of Canada who do not want to have their rights tampered with to satisfy the spurious and fraudulent false front arguments of special minority groups.

FishFlag photo FishFlag_zps0946efd9.png

True to his name there’s definitely something “fishy” about this lastest SCC decision.

 

RothsteinFlag photo RothsteinFlag_zps2256d32f.png

SCC Justice Rothstein has served as an adjudicator under the Manitoba Human Rights Act from 1978 to 1983 and as a member of the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal from 1986 to 1992. He has also held many other offices or appointments connected to the Manitoba Human Rights Act and the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal.

So what have people like Marshall Rothstein learned from all of their involvement in harassing and vilifying and criminalizing Canadians for having exercised their God-given right to freedom of expression and speech? By all appearances he’s learned that the manipulation of the law,when it is being supported by a Fifth Column media and a host of complicit, compromised politicians under the sway of the Zionist lobby, is relatively easy to accomplish and virtually a fait accompli.

———

Richard Warman’s ‘Maximum Disruption’ Attacks upon Freedom of Speech in Canada from Marc Lemire at freedomsite.org

Dear Free Speech supporters,

First I wish to thank Marc Lemire for sending along the information contained below. His valiant and courageous efforts over many years are worthy of our deepest appreciation.

The actions of the entity known as Richard Warman are definitely ones that Canadians should be more aware of. Given his propensity for decades of ongoing attacks against freedom of expression here in Canada I feel it behooves all Canadians to take a closer look at his conduct. In doing so people ought to ask themselves how in God’s name our legal system could permit someone like this to go on year after year running amok and getting away with his endless attempts at exploiting Canadian laws for the benefit of his own selfish gain, not to mention the tacit support given to those foreign Jewish lobby groups such as B’nai Brith Canada and the Canadian Jewish Congress; Zionist organizations hell-bent on silencing any and all legitimate criticism of their and Israel’s historic wrongs against humanity.

Warman of course is one of the two B’nai Brith Canada operatives who has been on my ass since 2007, doing his damnedest to shut down www.radicalpress.com and drive me into the hole financially. He’s not alone though for no man is an island unto himself when it comes to the “Jewish hate speech” racket that the Zionist and their lobbyist organizations have created and exploited throughout all the nations of the West since WWII in their ongoing efforts to cover up Zion’s endless crimes.

Back in 2007 when I was first charged with a sec. 13(1) “hate crime” complaint by Harry Abrams and the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada Warman wasn’t named on any of the documents. Had it not been for the fact that I was able to obtain a leaked email I would not have been aware of his surreptitious involvement in my case.

When word got out that I had received this Bolshevik/Zionist “show trial” accusative “complaint” document in my mailbox on November 20, 2007 my local newspaper, the Quesnel Cariboo Observer was interested in doing an interview with me on the subject. Having been a regular contributor to its Letters to the Editor section in the local community paper for over 35 years, plus a bi-weekly columnist, the locals in the community were obviously curious about this sudden complaint from the world’s largest Jewish lobby group.

On January 13, 2008 the Observer ran an article entitled, “TOPHAM VIEWS UNDER ATTACK: B’nai Brith claims anti-Jewish writings“. In the article was expressed my viewpoint and why I felt that B’nai Brith Canada was acting the way it was.

As soon as that story hit the streets Harry Abrams of the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada was on the telephone from Victoria, B.C. doing his utmost to browbeat and intimidate the journalist who had interviewed me for the article. It’s not the first time that ol’ Harry was found to be extremely abusive when dealing with those who he felt were not behaving as good goyim ought to behave when it comes to the questionable machinations of the Jewish state of Israel. Of course the journalist was not impressed one iota with Abrams’ manner of communication.

Soon afterwards Abrams wrote a response to the Letters section of the Observer wherein he did his best to bring up the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion and use that document as some sort of proof that I was posting hate literature against those of the Jewish faith. At the same time he basically demanded that I should remove all posts that he felt were unacceptable and if I did so then that would be the end of the matter. Of course his wishes never came true and beside, given the way that his co-conspirator Richard Warman operates, it’s highly doubtful that had I kowtowed to Abrams’ request that the matter would have ended. As we know from Warman’s relentless attacks upon Marc Lemire, AFTER MARC WILLINGLY REMOVED WHATEVER OFFENDING POSTS WERE ON A WEBSITE RAN BY HIM, complying with their Orwellian demands only makes these censorship control freaks that much more inclined to sink their fangs deeper into their perceived victims.

Following Abrams’ letter to the Editor which was published on January 27, 2008 the newspaper was flooded with letters of support for me that came from around the world. This was just too much for the cheeky Cheka twins, Abrams & Warman, and soon thereafter the owner and publisher of the Quesnel Cariboo Observer, David Black of Black Press (not associated with Conrad Black) received a letter from these two Zionist agents threatening his company with a law suit should it continue to publish any more articles related to the sec. 13 complaint that Abrams had laid against me via the Canadian Human Rights Commission (CHRC). Warman’s and Abrams’ argument was that the sec. 13(1) complaint was before the CHRC and no decision had yet been made so it was illegal for the Quesnel Cariboo Observer to be publishing anything pertaining to the matter. Of course, like all things that the Zionists say and do, it was pure bullshit.

There are NO legal restrictions in reporting on matters related to the machinations of the Zionist-controlled Canadian Human Rights Commission nor its accessory in crime, the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal. Both these Zionist infested orgs are considered to be quasi-judicial in nature and not subject to the same restrictions as the official Canadian Judicial System (even though it too is just as infested as the others with pro-Zionist sycophants).

And so the upshot of all of this was that Black Press decided it wouldn’t stand up for freedom of speech or to the Jewish lobby and ended up bending to the pressure of these two snivelling censorship snakes and from then on until June of this year a veil of silence hung over my six year long battle with these haters of free expression. That is why you will not be able to find the articles noted above except on my website where I was able to post them prior to their censorship by Black Press.

I’m writing this background information as an aid in understanding just how insane the court system has become since it’s been co-oped by the Jewish lobbyists and their pro-Zionist lawyers and judges who inevitably put the desires of Israel and the racist ideology of Zionism first and foremost when it comes to upholding the supposed rights and freedoms of all Canadians to expressing their views on the Internet.

When I was arrested back in May of 2012 Det-Cst Terry Wilson of the BC HATE CRIME TEAM made a big deal out of trying to convince me that their unit was going to be investigating these charges in a wholly new and unbiased manner and were not planning on bringing into the equation all of the past dealings that I had with these two bozos who had just laid the second sec. 319(2) charge against me; one that resulted in being jailed, losing my firearms and my computers and all of my electronic files and email going back many years.

But of course this was just another stinking pile of crap from another pro-Zionist special agent working for B’nai Brith along with Abrams and Warman. As it turned out later on I found that Det – Cst Wilson had been working with these zio-rats for many years before and all of this sudden new charge and arrest, etc. was nothing less than a further extension of their earlier attempts to shut me down and put me in jail in order to keep the truth about the Zionists hidden from the general public.

So please bear this in mind as you read through the list of vicious attacks perpetrated upon innocent people who have had their rights and freedoms suppressed, spent time in jail, and had their computers and files and firearms seized and their bank accounts drained all because of this one entity who should have been disbarred years ago and prevented from engaging in any legal activities.

Richard Warman is the epitome of all that is wrong with our Canadian legal system and anyone who has ever been harassed, threatened or victimized by this serial psychopathic complainer should be absolved of all accusations and convictions, their names cleared by the federal court and financially compensated for any and all legal costs incurred during their lengthy battles to retain their fundamental rights as given by Canada’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms. As an associate suggested after reading my initial comments here, “An application should be made, if it has not been done already, to have Warman declared a ‘Vexatious Litigant’ – there is ample precedent I think for this where an individual has persistently abused the system, an offence of which Warman is guilty, in spades!  The fact that he has been clearly motivated by malice and personal financial gain and assists a subversive political lobby, would reinforce the application.”

Nothing less in terms of redress ought to be considered when it comes to Richard Warman. Apart from disbarment, a healthy jail sentence of say five years ought to give this traitorous Zionist lackey enough time to reflect on his actions and prepare for a new career upon his release.

With the end of 2012 only hours away I’d like to take one final parting shot at this whole sordid affair known as Zionism. After years and years of researching its fundamentals and observing its ideology in action I’ve come to the only conclusion that I feel any honest, decent human being could be expected to reach. Zionism is, in truth, a mental disease. It’s a psychotic, delusional state of mind wherein adherents to its core cognitive structure and values – all contingent upon a mental belief that one small segment of the human family or species is somehow above and separate from all the rest of humanity – tend to behave in a cult-like fashion in order to outwardly express this political (psycho-mental philosophy) doctrine; one that sees no wrong in the destruction and murder and terrorization of any and all other human beings who stand in the way of its ultimate fulfillment. I can also state with added assurance that the new year will see more and more reasonable, intelligent and caring, loving individuals come to a similar conclusion as the weight of evidence backing such a contention grows heavier and heavier and the Zionist Beast grows more and more desperate and deranged in its behaviour.

God grant that we will stop it before the destruction gets beyond our control.

The best to all of you in 2013!

Love & Peace & Justice for All,

Arthur Topham
Publisher & Editor
The Radical Press
“Digging to the root of the issues since 1998″

________________________________
From:  Marc Lemire <marc@lemire.com>

Subject:  Richard Warman’s ‘Maximum Disruption’ Approach:  Defamation Suits, Criminal Complaints, Section 13 cases and even Copyright Act lawsuits

Date:  31 December, 2012 1:01:18 AM PST

Richard Warman’s ‘Maximum Disruption’ Approach:

Defamation Suits, Criminal Complaints, Section 13 cases and even Copyright Act lawsuits

http://blog.freedomsite.org/2012/12/richard-warmans-maximum-disruption.html

http://canadianhumanrightscommission.blogspot.ca/2012/12/richard-warmans-maximum-disruption.html

Richard Warman is one of Canada’s leading serial complainants.  Richard Warman described his tactic of filing complaints as “Maximum Disruption” in a speech he gave to a group called Anti-Racist Action.  According to Mr. Warman; “This approach involved working with the police, the Canadian Human Rights Commission and other organizations to create “maximum disruption” within what he perceives to be the Neo-Nazi movement in Canada.”

Here is a list of some of the lawsuits and other complaints he has filed:

—————————————————–

 

People Richard Warman has sued or threatened to sue


 
Alphabetically sorted
 
 
Person
Court file # or Source
1)   
3535991 Canada Inc.
Ontario Court File No. 12-55389
2)   
Andrea Rondeau
Ontario Court File No. 10-47357
3)   
Andrew Spencer (Droid1963)
Ontario Court File No. 07-CV-039927SR
4)   
Arnie Lemaire
Ontario Court File No. 09-46638
5)   
Banyen Books
Ontario Court File No. 02-CV-237691SR
6)   
BC Libraries Association
Macleans Magazine: April 21, 2008
7)   
Biosfaire
Ontario Court File No. 02-CV-237691SR
8)   
Black Press Group Ltd.
9)   
Boule De Neige
Ontario Court File No. 02-CV-237691SR
10)           
Bridge of LovePublications
Ontario Ontario Court File No. 02-CV-237691SR
11)           
Byron Tau
12)           
Canadian Association for Free Expression
Ontario Court File No: 04-CV-26550SR
13)           
Canoe Inc.
Ontario Court File No. 12-53851
14)           
Canwest Digital Media
Ontario Court File No. 10-47357
15)           
Canwest Global Communications Corp
Ontario Court File No. 10-47357
16)           
Canwest Interactive
Ontario Court File No. 10-47357
17)           
Canwest Limited Partnership
Ontario Court File No. 10-47357
18)           
Canwest Mediaworks Inc.
Ontario Court File No. 10-47357
19)           
Canwest Mediaworks Publications Inc.
Ontario Court File No. 10-47357
20)           
Canwest Publishing Inc.
Ontario Court File No. 10-47357
21)           
Catherine McMillan
Ontario Court File No: 08-CV-352197SR
22)           
Constance Fournier
Ontario Court File No. 07-CV-039927SR
23)           
Constance Fournier
Ontario Court File No: 08-CV-352197SR
24)           
Constance Fournier
Ontario Court File No. 08-CV-352212SR
25)           
Cowichan Valley Citizen
Ontario Court File No. 10-47357
26)           
Crossroads Television System Inc.
Ontario Court File No. 10-49969
27)           
Dan Lepage (SaskBigPicture)
Ontario Court File No. 07-CV-039927SR
28)           
Eternal Moment Bookstore
Ontario Court File No. 02-CV-237691SR
29)           
Ezra Levant
Ontario Court File No: 08-CV-352197SR
30)           
Ezra Levant
Ontario Court File No. CV-09-00370919
31)           
Ezra Levant
Ontario Court File No. 12-53851
32)           
Ezra Levant
Ontario Court File No. 12-55389
33)           
Ontario Court File No: 08-CV-352197SR
34)           
Ontario Court File No: 08-CV-352197SR
35)           
Ontario Court File No. 08-CV-352212SR
36)           
Global TV Calgary
Ontario Court File No. 10-47357
37)           
Global TV Lethbridge
Ontario Court File No. 10-47357
38)           
Jason Bertucci (Faramir)
Ontario Court File No. 07-CV-039927SR
39)           
Jason Ouwendyk
Ontario Small Claims Court File No. 03-SC-081720
40)           
John Doe (conscience)
Ontario Court File No. 07-CV-039927SR
41)           
John Doe (HR-101)
Ontario Court File No. 07-CV-039927SR
42)           
John Doe (Klinxx)
Ontario Court File No. 07-CV-039927SR
43)           
John Doe (Padraigh)
Ontario Court File No. 07-CV-039927SR
44)           
Jonathan Kay
Ontario Court File No: 08-CV-352197SR
45)           
Kamloops Public Library
46)           
Kathy Shaidle
Ontario Court File No: 08-CV-352197SR
47)           
Kathy Shaidle
Ontario Court File No. 12-53851
48)           
Kelly McParland
Ontario Court File No. CV-09-00370919
49)           
Knowledge Bookstore
Ontario Court File No. 02-CV-237691SR
50)           
Mark Fournier
Ontario Court File No: 08-CV-352197SR
51)           
Mark Fournier
Ontario Court File No. 07-CV-039927SR
52)           
Mark Fournier
Ontario Court File No. 08-CV-352212SR
53)           
Michael Coren
Ontario Court File No. 10-49969
54)           
Michael Coren
Ontario Court File No. 12-53851
55)           
Michael Veck
Ontario Court File No. CV-10-410527
56)           
National Post Company
Ontario Court File No: 08-CV-352197SR
57)           
National Post Company
Ontario Court File No. CV-09-00370919
58)           
Northern Alliance
Ontario Small Claims Court File No. 03-SC-081720
59)           
Paul Fromm
Ontario Court File No: 04-CV-26550SR
60)           
Preferred Network
Ontario Court File No. 02-CV-237691SR
61)           
Quebecor Media Inc.
Ontario Court File No. 12-53851
62)           
Quebecor Media Inc.
Ontario Court File No. 12-55389
63)           
Quesnel Cariboo Observer (Newspaper)
64)           
Roger Smith (Peter O’ Donnell)
Ontario Court File No. 07-CV-039927SR
65)           
Russell McOrmond
66)           
Seekers Books
Ontario Court File No. 02-CV-237691SR
67)           
Shirley Skolos
Ontario Court File No. 10-47357
68)           
Ontario Court File No: 08-CV-352197SR
69)           
Sun Media Corporation
Ontario Court File No. 12-53851
70)           
Sun Media Corporation
Ontario Court File No. 12-55389
71)           
Sun TV News General Partnership
Ontario Court File No. 12-55389
72)           
The McGill Tribune
73)           
Thompson Nicola Regional Public Libraries
Macleans Magazine: April 21, 2008
74)           
Tom Kennedy
Ontario Court File No. 02-CV-237691SR
75)           
Toronto Public Library
Toronto Public Library:  MATERIALS REVIEW COMMITTEE RECONSIDERATION OF MATERIALS SUMMARY – 2002
76)           
TVA Group Inc.
Ontario Court File No. 12-55389
77)           
Vancouver Public Library
78)           
Victoria Indymedia
79)           
Victoria Public Library
80)           
Walker Morrow
Ontario Court File No. 10-47357
81)           
William Grosvenor
Ontario Court File No. 08-CV-40460SR
 
 
Lawsuits filed under Canada’s Copyright Act
 
 
1)
Richard Warman and National Post v Mark and Constance Fournier
Federal Court of Canada:  T-784-11
2)
Richard Warman and National Post v Mark and Constance Fournier
Federal Court of Appeal:  A-395-12
 
 
Section 13 Complaints by Richard Warman
Cases before the CHRC and/or Canadian Human Rights Tribunal
 
 
1
T726_3102
FRED KYBURZ
2
T998/11804
Eldon Warman
3
T869/11903
Alexan Kulbashian,
4
T869/11903
James Scott Richardson,
5
T869/11903
Tri-city Skins.com,
6
T869/11903
Canadian Ethnic Cleansing Team,
7
T869/11903
Affordable Space.com
8
T1021/0205
Tomasz Winnicki
9
T1072/5305
Craig Harrison
10
T1071/5205
Peter Kouba
11
T1088/6905
Glenn Bahr
12
T1087/6805
Western Canada for Us
13
T1104/8505
Terry Tremaine
14
20031846
Alex Di Civita
15
20031844
Liz Lampman
16
T1095/7605
Bobby Wilkinson
17
T1095/7605
“Canadian Nazi Party”
18
T1106/8705
Jessica Beaumont
19
T1073/5405
Marc Lemire
20
20031956
Freedomsite .org
21
T1090/7105
Melissa Guille
22
T1090/7105
Canadian Heritage Alliance
23
 
Ciaran Paul Donnelly
24
20030360
WCOTC (World Church of the Creator)
25
T1217/2907
Jason Ouwendyk
26
T1216/2807
Northern Alliance
 
 
Criminal Complaints by Richard Warman
 
1
Alexan Kulbashian
Warman’s Testimony in Lemire Case
2
Arthur Topham
3
Bill White
4
Ciarian Donnelly
Warman’s Testimony in Lemire Case
5
Craig Harrison
Warman’s Testimony in Lemire Case
6
Freedomsite
Warman’s Testimony in Lemire Case
7
Glenn Bahr
Warman’s Testimony in Lemire Case
8
James Richardson
Warman’s Testimony in Lemire Case
9
Jessica Beaumont
Warman’s Testimony in Lemire Case
10
Marc Lemire
Warman’s Testimony in Lemire Case
11
Peter Kouba
Warman’s Testimony in Lemire Case
12
Terry Tremaine
13
William Grosvenor
Warman Speech – University of Moncton – March 16, 2010
 
 
 
  • Please note, for all cases; please refer to the original source material.  In the case of the Libel suits, where the source is indicated as a court file, that is an actual lawsuit Warman has filed.  Where the source is something other, like a URL, please refer to the originating material.  This may or may not be a lawsuit or threatened lawsuit by Warman.  The truths of the statements are via the websites.
  • Please refer to the original source material.  This document consists of an overview of cases which (it appears that) Warman has filed or threatened.  This is not a complete list.  There may be many other cases in all categories, including criminal complaints, libel complaints, Section 13 cases, etc.
  • If any mistakes are made of this page, please send an email to; marc@lemire.com for correction.
 
 

Richard Warman’s ‘Maximum Disruption’ Approach:

Defamation Suits, Criminal Complaints, Section 13 cases and even Copyright Act lawsuits

 

http://blog.freedomsite.org/2012/12/richard-warmans-maximum-disruption.html

http://canadianhumanrightscommission.blogspot.ca/2012/12/richard-warmans-maximum-disruption.html

 
 _______________________________
 

NOTE: My apologies for having to include the following appeal but out of necessity, I am forced to ask for financial assistance in this ongoing battle with the foreign interest censors who are determined to stop all freedom of expression in Canada. Due to the fact that the Crown is refusing to give the required disclosure to my lawyer I am not able to apply for legal aid. This leaves me in the unenviable position of having to rely solely upon donations to pay for my legal expenses. 

The day after my lawyer’s appearance in Quesnel on the 19th of December I received an invoice showing a balance of $5,222.79 still owing on Mr. Christie’s account.  Given my minimal monthly pension of approximately $1400.00 out of which I must pay my mortgage and utilities and insurance on home and vehicles (this doesn’t cover additional costs for fuel and food) which come to approximately $1200.00 one can see that it’s virtually impossible for me to cover these expenses without further assistance from supporters.

As such I would once again implore readers to give serious consideration to helping me out by either sending a donation via PayPal using either a PayPal account or a credit card or else sending a cheque or Money Order or cash to me via snail mail at the following postal address. Cash of course also works. Please don’t make the cheque out to “RadicalPress” as that account is no longer available to me.

Arthur Topham

4633 Barkerville Highway

Quesnel, B.C.

Canada

V2J 6T8

To access my PayPal button please go to either the Home Page at http://www.radicalpress.com or my blog http://www.quesnelcariboosentinel.com The PayPal button is up on the right hand corner of the Home Page on either site. Feel free to click on it.

Sincerely,

Arthur Topham

Pub/Ed

The Radical Press

 

 

Radical Press Legal Update #7

Radical Press Legal Update #7

Radical Press Legal Update #7

Yesterday’s  Bail  Hearing was a three hour session in the Quesnel Court house.

The regular Judge who has been presiding over the various applications thus far was unable to attend and instead we had a female Judge by the name of M. Church who heard the application.

Crown of course had first kick at the cat and Crown Council Jennifer Johnston opened her remarks by giving Judge Church a brief overview of the case which included her reasons for why Crown has still not provided my lawyer with full disclosure in the case.

According to CC Johnston the period from my initial arrest on May 16, 2012 until October 9, 2012 had proven to be an insufficient time period in order to get enough evidence together so that an Indictment could be handed down by the October 9 deadline and that, apparently, somehow justified not providing Mr. Christie with full disclosure.

After the October 9 deadline I was no longer under the original bail conditions that restricted me from posting on my website although for some odd reason I didn’t become aware of this fact until close to 3 weeks after the fact .

The Crown eventually got their sworn information on November 5, 2012 and notified my lawyer that there would be a call date set for Nov. 6 where I was to appear in court. That date was subsequently changed to the 8th of November as Doug Christie was out in Saskatchewan attending to another case and couldn’t appear via telephone on the 6th. It was Crown’s letter to Mr. Christie on Nov. 5th that also informed him that Crown had asked for an endorsed warrant that would allow Crown to have all of the original bail conditions reinstated.

When I appeared on November 8, 2012 the Judge listened to both sides of the arguments and ruled that only some of the original conditions would remain i.e., those concerning my order not to have any contact with the two knaves (Warman and Abrams) who laid the alleged complaint to the RCMP and also the cops hanging on to my illegally stolen firearms. At the same time he set a new date of December 13, 2012 when Mr. Christie could be in court to represent me and Crown would be given the opportunity to argue for the reinstatement of the additional restrictions originally imposed on me by Det – Cst Terry Wilson on the day I got out of jail.

Of course December 13, 2012 proved to be bad timing weather wise and my lawyer was unable to fly into Quesnel that day so again a decision on Crown’s application was delayed for another week which brought it up to December 19, 2012 which was yesterday.

After running through that time line Crown then began their argument for wanting to reinstate the additional Orwellian restraints that would prohibit me from posting articles anywhere on the Internet available to the general public or to allow anyone else to post on any of my other websites that were owned by me.

Just prior to commencing her argument Crown Council Jennifer Johnston told Judge Church that unfortunately she hadn’t been able to provide Mr. Christie with the big fat 1″ thick bail disclosure document because she had been informed by Det – Cst Terry Wilson that when the Indictment was handed down the National Post had published an article on the case which contained statements that the reporter had gleaned from another website called FreeDominion.ca. Those statements were from what is called a “Warned” statement which is considered by the courts to be part of disclosure and therefore confidential information that is not supposed to be given out to the public. The Warned statement was a digital voice recording that Det – Cst Terry Wilson had made of his conversation with me just prior to my release from jail on May 16, 2012. Why IT was given to my lawyer when all the other disclosure documents are still being withheld by Crown is still a mystery to both myself and Mr. Christie but in the case of this particular document when I received a copy of it I didn’t realize it was confidential and had so I had shared it with an associate in a private email and unbeknownst to myself failed to notify them that it was confidential.

Anyhow a couple of quotes were taken from it and posted in the National Post and that was the big reason, according to CC Jennifer Johnston why she was refusing to divulge any more disclosure materials to Mr. Christie. This issue had come up on Dec. 13 when Crown was arguing before Judge Morgan that a second application had been filed regarding the matter of the illegal disclosure but no agreement could be found at the time and Mr. Christie had refused to agree to it.

At this point Crown told Judge Church that she would be willing to let Mr. Christie take a look at the bail disclosure document even though Crown’s application had not be resolved but that he would have to give it back at the end of the hearing! All of this was the typical Catch-22 scenarios that have been playing out since day one of this charade.

The Judge obviously knew that Mr. Christie couldn’t be expected to argue against something he hadn’t even seen so after a bit of discussion it was agreed that Crown would give Mr. Christie the disclosure document and a short 15 recess would be called so that he and I would have an opportunity to take a look at what Crown was planning to use in their argument for reinstating the original harsh bail conditions on me.

It only took about 5 minutes of perusing the document to realize what was going to be the Crown’s argument and we quickly went back and let the clerk know that the recess should end as soon as possible and court resume. Mr. Christie was well aware of the time constraints and needed every minute for his arguments.

Court resumed and Crown Council Johnston began her argument that I had been publishing all these articles, updates, etc. since November 2, 2012 (legally, mind you) and then proceeded to go through individual posts selecting various quotes to back up her position. It was the standard Zionist double-speak argument that posts were continuing to spread hate toward the Jews and Zionists and were attacking unfairly Det -Cst Terry Wilson and his partner-in-crime Cst Normandie Levas and thus possibly endangering their safety!

This went on until about 3 p.m. when she finally concluded her remarks and a break was taken before Mr. Christie was given time to present his arguments.

The issue of the leaked disclosure was addressed first and Mr. Christie told that Judge that he would have no problem with the Court issuing an Order stating that in future neither he nor myself would disclose any confidential information to any third parties not directly connected to the case and definitely not for publication.

Doug then commenced his argument with a bountiful supply of case law references and quickly outlined for the Judge some precedents which included the legal right for publishers and writers to criticize both Jews and Zionists citing articles in various mainstream publications like the New York Times and other Zionist controlled media. His point being that no particular group is exempt from criticism and that includes Jews or those who support political Zionism. Regarding my criticisms of the RCMP he also pointed out to the court that the RCMP were certainly not above criticism and given their public image of late he didn’t feel Crown’s argument in this regard was worthy of consideration.

He also made it crystal clear that what Crown was attempting to do flew in the face any and all statutes currently within the Canadian legal system. By that I mean Crown’s attempt to curtail my Charter Rights to freedom of expression and access to the Internet prior to my case being heard in a court of law and a decision being handed down as to whether or not I did in fact publish materials that were ultimately deemed to be “willful promotion of hatred” as contained in sec. 319(2) of the Canadian Criminal Code.

To a priori assume that whatever I am publishing is “hatred” and then ask the court to impose such severe curtailments upon my Charter rights prior to being tried is verboten and should not be considered as a reasonable argument.

During Crown’s argument CC Johnston had cited the Basi-Virk Trial (of all trials!) to back up some of her comments regarding the need to protect witnesses. In this instances she was trying to correlate my Warned statement conversation with Det – Cst Terry Wilson with that of secondary witnesses in the Basi-Verk case. When Doug came to this he quickly pointed out to the Judge the vast difference between witness evidence by anonymous third parties and statements directly given to the arresting officer by the accused as was the case in point regarding Crown’s argument.

One by one Mr. Christie countered Crown Council’s arguments and this went on until around 4:15 p.m. at which time Mr. Christie concluded his remarks by informing the Judge that he had a plane to catch before 5 p.m. and that he would have to stop. Doug asked me at this point to call the airport to confirm the exact time when the plane was leaving so I had to leave the court room for about five minutes.

While I was gone Crown apparently tried to refute all of Doug’s arguments and told the Judge that because I was charged with a “Hate” crime that Crown could then basically impose whatever restrictions they wanted to on me. The Judge apparently wasn’t convinced and just when I got back into the court room I heard her telling Crown and Defence that she would be considering the arguments and submitting a request to another body (not sure which one at this point) for further clarification come early January and then after that she would notify Crown and Defence of her decision.

So basically there will be no further bail conditions imposed on myself until January of 2013 at the earliest. We quickly packed up our things and drove Doug out to the airport where he bid us a fond fair well.

For now we will finally have a couple of weeks grace in order to relax a bit and enjoy the Christmas season.

——–

NOTE: Out of necessity I am forced to ask for financial assistance in this ongoing battle with the censors. Due to the fact that the Crown is refusing to give the required disclosure to my lawyer I am not able to furnish legal aid with the required documents that they demand before looking at whether or not I might qualify for legal financial assistance. This leaves me in the unenviable position of having to rely solely upon donations to pay for my legal expenses. The airfare alone yesterday for my lawyer to appear in court in Quesnel to defend me against these false charges was $1,050.00 return and given my minimal monthly pension it’s virtually impossible for me to cover these expenses.
As such I would once again implore readers to give serious consideration to helping me out by either sending a donation via PayPal using either a PayPal account or a credit card or else sending a cheque or Money Order to me via snail mail at the following postal address. Cash of course also works.
Arthur Topham
4633 Barkerville Highway
Quesnel, B.C.
Canada
V2J 6T8
To access my PayPal button please go to either the Home Page at http://www.radicalpress.com or my blog http://www.quesnelcariboosentinel.com The PayPal button is up on the right hand corner of the Home Page on either site.
Sincerely,
Arthur Topham
Pub/Ed
The Radical Press

 

 

 

 

 

B’nai Brith, ADL, Child Porn, Regina and Arthur Topham by Arthur Topham

B’nai Brith, ADL, Child Porn, Regina and Arthur Topham

B’nai Brith, ADL, Child Porn, Regina and Arthur Topham

 

by 

Arthur Topham

December 17, 2012

From the very beginning of my longstanding legal battle with B’nai Brith Canada and the International Jewish Lobby it has been my intention to point a fierce yet truthful finger at World Jewry: the primary purpose being to bring to the forefront for Canadians the true identity and purpose of these front organizations that the Zionists have set up over the past couple of centuries to deceive the gullible goyim (non-Jews) on multiple levels.

A prime example of how, like clockwork, Zionists inevitably resort to the same tactics over and over, is the recent behaviour by the Crown in my upcoming sec. 319(2) CCC “Hate Crime” case involving B’nai Brith Canada and the RCMP’s Det-Cst Terry Wilson of the “BC HATE CRIME TEAM”.

In my last Legal Update #6 published on December 14, 2012 reference was made to the fact that I would publish an article related to the subject of this incident that took place (again) during my last court appearance on December 13, 2012).

Since the onset of the false allegations brought on by Richard Warman and Harry Abrams of B’nai Brith Canada that led to my arrest on May 16, 2012 the Crown has done its damnedest to portray me in a false and negatively perverse light.

Beginning with my first appearance in the Quesnel court room Crown Council Jennifer Johnston immediately began her vilification of my person by resorting to “case law” (examples from former court cases used as precedents that purported prove similar intent and purpose) that equated the cases referenced by her to my own situation with respect to the articles which I have posted on RadicalPress.com.

The “case” in point here being the Crown’s feeble and malicious attempt to suggest to the presiding Judge that articles published on RadicalPress.com are of the same revulsive caliber as photographs and videos of child pornography and sexual abuse that are illegally posted on the Internet and exchanged between perverts via email and that when it comes to any consideration on the part of the Judge as to the degree and severity of bail conditions that ought to be imposed upon me during the course of this bolshevik show trial that this fallacious argument on Crown’s part ought to be given serious consideration so that I would not be permitted to continue to post anything further on the website or possibly even be permitted to email friends and associates.

This, dear lover of freedom of speech, is the degree of chutzpah (arrogance) and deception which permeates not only the mindset of the Jewish lobbies around the world but also that supposedly impartial, independent and august body within Canada’s judicial system (the Crown) which is currently doing the bidding of this foreign agent of Israel – B’nai Brith Canada.

One of the hallmarks of Zionist thinking is to turn whatever truth exists upon its head and then attempt to portray the actual perpetrator of a crime as the innocent victim and nowhere will you find a better example than in the case of sexual perversion, child pornography, deviancy of all types and the secretive masonic order known to the world as B’nai Brith.

I might add too at this point that it’s a known fact, boldly and unabashedly announced by the perpetrators themselves, that the global porn industry was initiated by and has been controlled by Jews since the very beginning. Anyone doubting this need only type into the Google search engine the aforementioned topic and they will find this simple fact out for themselves.

In my own case because of these false allegations made against my person, my life’s work and Truth itself I will site two precedent setting cases that show both the hypocrisy and the deceit that this purportedly “benevolent Jewish society” has projected upon the public’s perception via their controlled media over the past century.

The first is a recent incident that actually took place at the time when I was battling with the Canadian Human Rights Act’s sec. 13(1) complaint that Harry Abrams and the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada had filed against me back in 2007.

During the course of that long and protracted exchange of arguments and motions that eventually led to a decision by the Canadian Human Rights Commission to uphold and lend credence to the complaint; one which eventually moved the case into the hands of the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal (another communist/zionist style, quasi-judicial body of appointed Zionists doing the bidding of their taskmasters from Israel) B’nai Brith’s touted moral superiority and unblemished integrity suffered a serious blow when one of their former Canadian directors of B’nai Brith Quebec, Bill Surkis, was arrested and charged on May 29, 2009 with possession of 86 videos containing close to nine hours of footage showing men engaged in sexual abuse of under children between the ages of six and fourteen. On top of the videos were an additional 153 photos also showing children being abused.

To add insult to injury Surkis’s lawyer Steven Slimovich (no pun intended!) at first attempted to convince the Crown that his client had all this porn on his computer for “The purpose of his viewing the child pornography material [in order] to educate himself on the topic of child pornography” so that afterwards he would be able to “go into schools and give lectures on people abusing people.”! That, I suggest, is the sort of chutzpah one continually confronts whenever this touted “benevolent” front organization gets caught with its pants down.

Of course even the Crown in this instance couldn’t pretend to fall for such a scam and they had to prosecute Surkis but given the severity of the charges: all three – possessing, accessing and distributing of child pornography – each carrying a maximum penalty on conviction of 10 years in prison, the final outcome of the trial which included plea bargaining to drop the “distributing child pornography” charge was one that showed the powerful influence of the Jewish lobby when it comes to protecting one of their own.

Out of a total of possibly 30 years imprisonment for the three initial charges what did this former registered lobbyist and Quebec Regional Director of B’nai Brith Canada, board chairman for the Holocaust Memorial Museum and Academic Dean of John Abbott College for 22 years receive as punishment for his crimes?  Why a grand total of 45 days in jail to be served on weekends, the minimum sentencing allowed under the law!

Oi veh is all I can say!

Yet in my own case, where a conviction for a said sec. 319(2) CCC  “Hate Crime” carries a maximum 2 year sentence, do you think that were the Crown to win their case that they would sentence me to say a relatively similar punishment of 5 to 10 days in jail to be served on weekends? Fat chance!

And so it’s fairly evident by now, given Crown Council Jennifer Johnston’s repeated references to Judge Morgan directly associating RadicalPress.com’s articles with child pornography, that her motive is designed to convince the Judge that extremely severe restrictions are justified and must be imposed upon me to prohibit me from writing and publishing any further (pornographic?) articles in my own defence or providing updated information to my long list of supporters and donors who are helping me (and themselves) in this battle to retain my Charter right to freedom of speech on the Internet.

One final irksome comment in this regard. Sturkis’ lawyer Slimovich also did his best to insure that his client, a “stellar” member of his Jewish community, who he stated was a “staunch individual” who “stood up for what is right” would not lose his privilege of retaining his home computer so that he could “continue to serve” his community. Whether he gained that right I was at this point unable to determine.

The second example is one that I will touch upon only briefly but will furnish readers with an url to a website where they can read about it in depth so as to understand the duration of time that has passed since this “benevolent” charity called B’nai Brith that has been fronting as a philanthropy organization for the past hundred years and longer first began their attempts at covering the blood soaked tracks of their membership via the use of their mainstream media propaganda mechanisms using both print and television to gain their dubious ends.

Today the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) of B’nai Brith is the foremost American Jewish watch dog and lobbyist for the state of Israel and for support of the Zionist ideology that buttresses said state’s political doctrines. Its influence in the USA is notoriously well known and its victims are legion since its inception back in the year 1913. The following “case” exposes the history behind why B’nai Brith created the ADL in the first place and it serves as yet another reminder of what this essay is trying to do, i.e. expose B’nai Brith’s true identity and its historic links with pedophelia.

Back in 1913 the United States of America witnessed a rather grizzly murder trial involving a Jew by the name of Leo M. Frank who was the owner of a sweat shop Pencil Company that employed young girls. Leo M. Frank was also president of the Atlanta, Georgia, Gate City [masonic] Lodge 144 Chapter of B’nai B’rith which had about 500 members. The controversy surrounding his sensational trial and subsequent conviction has been ongoing with the ADL still attempting to exonerate the pedophile sex killer as late as 1986.

I highly suggest that readers take a look at the website which exposes all the machinations surrounding this historic trial. It can be found at the following url: http://www.leofrank.org/introduction-to-leo-frank/

I believe these two examples given in this essay are reason enough to challenge Crown Council Jennifer Johnston’s erroneous assertions that she is putting forth in court which suggest that my work and the information contained on RadicalPress.com are somehow related to pedophilia and child pornography when the facts suggest that those who were involved in laying the complaint against me are the ones who ought to be ashamed and embarrassed by the ongoing behaviour of their own members in this highly suspect and shady Jewish lobby organization that is aggressively pursuing its agenda of supporting these so-called “Hate Crimes” in order to silence any criticism of themselves or of the state of Israel and its ideology of Zionism.

I’m sure there will be more to report on this issue as the trial unfolds.

—–

 

URGENT PRESS RELEASE FROM RADICALPRESS.COM PLEASE READ!

NetfirmsPromoAd

newRPlogo

Dear Radical Readers and Free Speech Supporters,

I trust that after reading this release that the irony of the above letter I found in my snail mail box right afterwards won’t go unnoticed. :-)

A ‘radical’ new twist has been thrown into the case of Regina vs Arthur Topham and RadicalPress.com.

Not too long after sending out my Legal Update #3 today I received an email from my RadicalPress.com web host server Netfirms.com. The letter, which I am appending below was basically the result of Det-Cst Terry Wilson of the BC Hate Crime Team having written to the legal department at Netfirms.com insisting that I and my website are publishing “Hate Propaganda” and that it most likely contravenes Netfirm.com’s company policy. I am including Wilson’s letter as well and also my responses which I have sent to Netfirms.com.

I would add that this technique of intimidating the web hosting company with allegations that have not been proven in a court of law are precisely the same technique that Harry Abrams and B’nai Brith Canada used against me back in 2007 to have my then server Alentus.com also give me 24 hours to find a new server. That time it cost me a large percentage of the content on my website due to the extreme time frame I was given to remove all the content on the site.

Now that B’nai Brith Canada have their attack dog Terry Wilson to do their dirty work for them he’s attempting to do the very same thing. As I cautioned Netfirms.com in my second reply to them this could mean serious legal repercussions if they “terminate” the site as it contains (which it does) substantial volumes of evidence that is required by the defence in this case.

Apart from alerting you all to these latest machinations which are highly doubtful as per their legality (I haven’t heard back from Doug Christie on this matter as yet) I would like to ask a favour of you all.

I am including the email address of “Zach P” the person who sent me the ultimatum and I would certainly appreciate it if you would send Zach a nice short (please make it civil. This is important) email informing him that you do not feel that RadicalPress.com is promoting any “hatred propaganda” and that you want to see the website remain available on the internet. Anything along these lines to let him know that you would not be impressed with Netfirms.com if they started censoring and pulling down legitimate website merely on the accusations of special interest groups here in Canada in conjunction with the RCMP.

If you would also Bcc a copy to me at radical@radicalpress.com that would be most appreciated. I sincerely need your help at this time as there remains only a day or so and possibly even less before I could end up having my site removed.

I thank you all for assisting me in this. So far I haven’t heard back from Netfirms.com regarding this matter.

Sincerely,

Arthur Topham
Pub/Ed
RadicalPress.com
“Digging to the root of the issues since 1998″

Email address for Zach P is legal@netfirms-inc.com

——————————————————–

Email from Netfirms.com regarding Det-Cst Terry Wilson’s letter to them.

From:     legal@netfirms-inc.com
Subject:     [P10300383000000000] Radical Press.com
Date:     21 November, 2012 12:11:12 PM PST
To:     Arthur Topham

Hello Arthur,

We have been advised by a visitor to your web site radicalpress.com that such web site contains content that is alleged to be untrue, offensive, slanderous, harassing or controversial in nature.

Accordingly, please remove such content within 48 hours of this notice. Failure to delete such content within such period will result in termination of your website.  The notice we received is below.

As you may know, we are a web hosting company. We are not responsible for the content or links posted by our customers who create and place content on websites that we host. We further do not “monitor” the websites that we host or prescreen the content placed by customers on their sites. However, when we become aware of allegations of improper activity by one of our customers using a hosted site, which would be a violation of our Terms of Service (TOS) governing the web sites, we take such situations seriously, investigate promptly, and take appropriate action.

Should you have further questions, please contact us.

Regards,
Zach P
Corporate Support
———————–

Here’s the letter from Det-Cst Terry Wilson to Netfirms.com:

This letter is undated.

Dear Sir or Madame, I am Detective Terry Wilson of the BC Hate Crime Team of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police E-Division Major Crime. I am the lead investigator into a Hate Propaganda investigation involving the above internet site.

I understand that on May 31, 12 we have requested, through the US Department of Justice, to preserve this website as we were working on a Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty (MLAT). I wish to confirm that this website is still being persevered as the MLAT process has taken longer than anticipated.

Secondly I would like to advise you that the administrator/owner of the website Mr Roy Arthur Topham has been now charged criminally with Section 319(2) of the Canadian Criminal Code of Canada for Wilful Promoting Hatred, over his website www.radicalpress.com. I see by your website policy that this may in fact contravene you policy, section 4 (b)(i) by using the website for “Hate Speech or other offensive speech or content”.

If you have any questions please don’t hesitate to contact me at the above email or at 604-543-4903.

Detective Constable Terry WILSON
B.C. Hate Crime Team
t.wilson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
604-543-4903
——————————-

My initial reply to Netfirms.com representative Zach P.:

From:     Editor
Subject:     Re: [P10300383000000000] Radical Press.com
Date:     21 November, 2012 12:46:16 PM PST
To:     legal@netfirms-inc.com

Dear Zach P,

Thank you for giving me a heads up regarding the letter which you have received from Det-Cst Terry Wilson of the BC Hate Crimes Team.

As you might well realize allegations of supposed “hate crimes” here in Canada are an initiative of the powerful Jewish lobby group in Canada known as B’nai Brith Canada. This organization has been harassing me and my website RadicalPress.com since November of 2007 when they first alleged that I was promoting “hatred toward Jews and/or citizens of Israel”. At that time they were using a section of the Canadian Human Rights Act ( sec. 13) to press their complaint to the Canadian Human Rights Commission.

After five years of litigation the government of Canada decided that this legislation contravened the Canadian Human Rights Code as it exists within our Charter of Rights and Freedoms and this law was rescinded on June 7th of this year.

Because of this the same lobbyists then attempted to try another avenue and proceeded to again charge me with this same alleged crime use the Criminal Code of Canada’s Section 319(2).

That charge came into effect on November 5, 2012.

All that said Zach this is the point you need to give your close attention to. This charge is being contested by my lawyer Mr. Douglas Christie who is an internationally renowned barrister who has been fighting such cases of Internet Freedom and Freedom of Speech issues here in Canada for over 25 years now.

This case, which Det-Cst Terry Wilson is alleging is a violation of your terms of agreement is one that has still to go through the courts and is to be tried by a Judge and Jury over the course of the next year or so. Until the case is completed and a verdict is handed down Zach there is not any evidence that what I have been charged with is in fact true.

I might also add that if my challenge to this law is not successful that the outcome will have a devastating effect upon Internet freedom here in Canada and will shift our country further into an Orwellian police state. I’m sure that you can understand that such a negative scenario is not one that Netfirms.com would wish to happen.

I would also like to draw your attention to the fact that another of your customers, Mr. Michael Chossodovsky owner of the internet site www.globalresearch.ca/ some years back faced this same situation with respect to his site and I was pleased that Netfirms.com didn’t act in haste and remove his website.

In fact that is why I have been paying you for Internet service over these past few years because of your strong dedication to issues such as internet freedom and freedom of speech.

To suddenly and peremptorily issue me an ultimatum such as this wherein you assume beforehand that a) that I am in fact guilty of this crime and b) that because of unfounded and unproven allegations I am therefore expected to remove whatever content (you don’t even specify that) someone has alleged is “untrue, offensive, slanderous, harassing or controversial in nature” is, to be quite honest, preposterous and an insult to common intelligence.

If you are going to shut down websites that are deemed “controversial” Zach what would you have left to host beyond business site?

I would ask that you give some very serious further thought to what you are threatening me here with. It seems highly unprofessional that Netfirms after years of my uninterrupted service and payment to you would suddenly turn on their customer because of trumped up charges brought on my Israeli lobbyist groups.

Please get back to me at your earliest possible convenience regarding this highly urgent matter.

Sincerely,

Arthur Topham
Pub/Ed
RadicalPress.com
“Digging to the root of the issues since 1998″

——————————————————-

My second reply to Netfirms.com representative Zach P.:

From:     Editor
Subject:     Re: [P10300383000000000] Radical Press.com
Date:     21 November, 2012 2:17:19 PM PST
To:     legal@netfirms-inc.com
Cc:   Doug Christie Law Office

Dear Zach,

Further to my initial response to your letter I would like to add some additional information which Det-Cst Terry Wilson failed to inform you of when he lodged his complaint and you immediately jumped to conclusions.

This case is now before the Supreme Court of Canada and as such all evidence having a bearing on it cannot, without serious repercussions of a legal nature, be either tampered with or destroyed by any third party to the proceedings.

Given this fact I would caution you, as I already have in my previous email, against taking any imprudent steps to pulling my website down. This website RadicalPress.com and all of its contents constitute the whole of the defence’s legal arguments in favour of proving that this charge is not only spurious but illegal and constitutionally invalid.

Were you therefore to destroy the evidence by “terminating” it via removal of the site from your server I fear you could be looking at some severe litigation problems yourself, possibly not only from my lawyer but from other legal organizations in Canada as well as the legal system itself.

I hope that you will give consideration to these matters and contact me back as soon as possible.

Sincerely,

Arthur Topham
Pub/Ed
RadicalPress.com
“Digging to the root of the issues since 1998″
——————————————————-

Catharsis in a Cab: Brit Expresses Global Outrage over Israeli Genocide of Palestinians

EDITOR’S NOTE:

The images alone of the dead Palestinian children and their grieving parents was already enough to make me weep but the outrage itself with Israel was a feeling that almost everyone at one point in their life must have felt when confronted with infamy of so great a nature that our moral sense is shocked beyond control.

The cab driver in this British video has expressed what so many of us have felt and still feel whenever we’re able to look directly into the bloody face of Israeli terrorism and evil.

Yes, there’s some cursing’ folks but it’s some of the best cursin’ that I’ve heard in a long while and it’s most appropriate under these conditions.

Please share this with others who are as frustrated as I am with PM Harper and rest of the traitorous, yellow-bellied political parties in Ottawa who have lost all their sense of integrity and dignity in order to kowtow to the world’s Number 1 Terrorist state – Israhell!

Sincerely,

Arthur Topham
Pub/Ed
RadicalPress.com
“Digging to the root of the issues since 1998″
——————————————————-

PLEASE CLICK ON URL TO VIEW VIDEO
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article33097.htm
CatharsisinaCab

Anonymous takes down over 9000 Jewish websites

FreePalestine

Greetings World

For far too long, Anonymous has stood by with the rest of the world and watched in despair the barbaric, brutal and despicable treatment of the Palestinian people in the so called “Occupied Territories” by the Israel Defense Force. Like so many around the globe, we have felt helpless in the face of such implacable evil. And today’s insane attack and threatened invasion of Gaza was more of the same.

child sacrifice

GazaChildVictim2

GazaChildVictim1

But when the government of Israel publicly threatened to sever all Internet and other telecommunications into and out of Gaza they crossed a line in the sand. As the former dictator of Egypt Mubarack learned the hard way – we are ANONYMOUS and NO ONE shuts down the Internet on our watch. To the IDF and government of Israel we issue you this warning only once. Do NOT shut down the Internet into the “Occupied Territories”, and cease and desist from your terror upon the innocent people of Palestine or you will know the full and unbridled wrath of Anonymous. And like all the other evil governments that have faced our rage, you will NOT survive it unscathed.

To the people of Gaza and the “Occupied Territories”, know that Anonymous stands with you in this fight. We will do everything in our power to hinder the evil forces of the IDF arrayed against you. We will use all our resources to make certain you stay connected to the Internet and remain able to transmit your experiences to the world. As a start, we have put together the Anonymous Gaza Care Package – http://bit.ly/XH87C5 – which contains instructions in Arabic and English that can aid you in the event the Israel government makes good on it’s threat to attempt to sever your Internet connection. It also contains useful information on evading IDF surveillance, and some basic first aid and other useful information. We will continue to expand and improve this document in the coming days, and we will transmit it to you by every means at our disposal. We encourage you to download this package, and to share it with your fellow Palestinians to the best of your ability.

We will be with you. No matter how dark it may seem, no matter how alone and abandoned you may feel – know that tens of thousands of us in Anonymous are with you and working tirelessly around the clock to bring you every aid and assistance that we can.

We Are Anonymous

We Are Everywhere

We Are Legion

We Do Not Forgive

We Do Not Forget

To the oppressors of the innocent Palestinian people, it is too late to EXPECT US

National Zionist Jew Post Sends Clear Message to Goy World!

NZJP Spoof article

Editor’s Note:

The above graphic is a sad and cynical spoof. It was the only thing that I could do to try and help the latest victims of Zionist Jew genocide in Gaza other than grabbing a rocket launcher and paddling my canoe across the Pacific to join the Palestinians in their tragic struggle to defend themselves against the continual onslaught of terrorism, violence, destruction and war that the state of Israel is subjecting them to before the eyes of the world!

Yesterday when I saw the Front Page of Sun Media Corp’s “National Post” I couldn’t resist doing something to expose the absolutely heinous, diabolical and psycho-satanic intentions of this sleezy, seditious, racist, blood-drenched Zionist Jew rag; one that the government of Stephen Harper continues to allow to print its hate-filled propaganda against the Arab world and feed to unwary Canadians as if it were anything closely resembling truthful journalism.

God help these warmongering tyrants were I ever to reach a position where I could veto their goddamned Orwellian media lies and send these criminal, traitorous bastards packing back to that hell-hole Isra-hell, the place they hypocritically call their “spiritual homeland”.

Again, like sadistic psychopaths these Talmud-driven tyrants of the Big Brother media flaunt their sick, twisted perverted agenda of savagery and blood lust against a defenseless group of imprisoned, defenseless victims before the world and expect that the millions of viewers will just suck it up and praise them for their despicable, disgusting, soul-less, genocidal crimes against humanity.

And they wonder why people “hate” them with a passion and consider them to be the most dangerous aberration upon the planet!

God bless and help the Palestinian people and while He’s at it give the rest of the complacent world a good swift kick in the ass! This cowardly and insane behaviour by a so-called nation state is beyond comprehension and belief. It must STOP!

Radical Press Legal Update #2

RPLegalUpdate

Dear Freedom of Speech supporters,

This is the the second Legal Update from RadicalPress.com regarding my pending Sec. 319(2) CC “Willful Promotion of Hatred” court case initiated by Richard Warman and Harry Abrams on behalf of their taskmaster, B’nai Brith Canada.

Allow me first to say that I am thankful for the opportunity to be still able to post this update on my website without fear of the thought police commissars busting down my door at midnight and hauling me away to some jail cell. Big thanks to my lawyer Douglas Christie for his professional assistance in court yesterday (Tuesday, November 13, 2002) via telephone from his Victoria, B.C. office.

The purpose of yesterday’s court proceedings was to set further court dates in order to deal with two outstanding issues:

1. To argue the issue of what if any restrictions should be imposed on my ability to communicate on the internet.

2. To ask that a clone of the hard drive of one of my Mac computers be returned to my lawyer so that we would have all the necessary information to use in my defense.

Let me elaborate a bit here on what transpired during this session before the representatives of the Queen of England aka “Regina”, aka “the Crown”.

First off with respect to the Honourable Justice Morgan who has been overseeing these proceedings during most of my appearances.

Judge Morgan has, up to this point, behaved in a most exemplary manner toward myself and my lawyer Doug Christie, treating both of us in a respectful manner and in the case of myself, when Doug is not able to be there either by phone or in person, the Judge has been most helpful in pointing out my legal rights and making practical, helpful suggestions.

On the other hand, when it comes to Crown Council Jennifer Johnston, I am witnessing a person who has been pursuing this case in a most aggressive and fiercely relentless manner since the start.

Granted she is young and in all likelihood as unaware of what the issue is as any other person who has never taken the time to research the whole phenomenon of Political Zionism and its connection to those who are now out for blood in this case.

Nonetheless her manner in the court room, while a touch more than border-line theatrical, is a thing to behold. I will undoubtedly have more to say about CC Johnston in further updates but I thought it might be appropriate at this point to give readers my personal impression of her demeanour. It really does appear that the more nonsense she receives from her guiding spirit, Det-Cst Terry Wilson of the BC HATE CRIME TEAM, the ‘meanour’ she gets. :-)

Wilson&LevasPhoto

When the issue of setting a date for my lawyer to address the draconian conditions that the Crown is again wanting to impose on me (likely for the duration of the upcoming trial by Judge and Jury) CC Johnston did her utmost to inform Judge Morgan that since November 2, 2012 (when I first realized I was free to post on my website once more), I had displayed the unabashed temerity and outright audacity to post 19 new articles!!!

OMG! or as my Talmud-driven detractors over at B’nai Brith Canada might have muttered under their breath, “Oi veh, such chutzpah coming from that anti-Semitic, hate-mongering goy!”

Then, in her ensuing ardour,  she added for emphasis a few juicy headline quotes that Det-Cst Terry Wilson had furnished her with; ones that he and his pretty partner in crime, Cst Normandie Levas, obviously gleaned from their daily inspection of my website, RadicalPress.com and figured were more solid proof that I’m continuing in my “Willful Promotion of Hatred” toward the “Jewish religion” and those of “Jewish ethnic origin”.

Your Honour, she said, the defendant has posted such headings as:

“Rothschild Zionist front designed to destroy free speech and control the internet”

“Jewish Supremacist Onslaught against Arthur Topham”

“Canada Is under brutal Jewish occupation”

I’m really not sure what she was expecting Judge Morgan to say to this but he responded in an impartial, intelligent manner conveying to the court that basically these are alleged offences, if in fact “offences at all” and then proceeded to go on to set a new date in order to deal with upcoming issues.

I should also add as a final note that the Disclosure documents containing all the information as to what the Crown intends to use in their subsequent court proceedings had still not arrived at Doug Christie’s office so the Judge set a new date of Tuesday, November 20th at 1:30 pm when the Crown and Defence will then try to find a further agreeable date to hold a Preliminary Hearing on the matter.

That is basically what took place yesterday, November 13th, 2012 in the Quesnel Court House.

————-

Why I Ought to Sue Ezra Levant by Arthur Topham

YoungEzraLevant

Why I Ought to Sue Ezra Levant

by Arthur Topham

November 11, 2012

As one can see from Ezra’s photo that appeared on the back cover of his 1996 book, YouthQuake, a production of The Fraser Institute, a right wing think tank that tends to promote Zionist ideals masked under deceptive language, he was at that time a fairly chipper-looking, albeit geeky looking eager beaver 24 year old young man already marked for fame and fortune.

In fact he’s actually the same age as my eldest daughter and obviously grew up in the same Canadian cultural setting and time period albeit it’s highly unlikely that his parents were hippies like my children’s parents were.

At the time Ezra’s book came out Michael Walker, Executive Director for The Fraser Institute remarked in its Preface that it was, “…written by one of the brightest student interns ever to work at The Fraser Institute. It is important because of the insights it provides into the mind-set of the next generation of Canadian leaders. For, certainly, Ezra Levant is going to be a Leader.”

Well, sixteen years later and many a mile down the road to fame and fortune we see that Ezra the younger, now 40 years, is in a position of some importance within the Zionist mainstream media in Canada having his own talk show on the SunTV News Network out of Toronto called The Source and having within his power the ability to help set the nation’s trends in terms of influencing television viewers across the country and beyond.

Now recently, having been charged by the Queen of England for supposedly committing a “hate” crime against “people of the Jewish religion or ethnic origin” I noticed that Ezra had taken a keen interest in my case and requested an interview with my lawyer Doug Christie to discuss it on his talk show. Having been caught up in the “hate speech” web himself over the past number of years with the same culprit responsible for having laid the present charge against me I could see why he would find the subject of some interest and want to discuss it further.

Of course Ezra didn’t have the chutzpah to invite me on to his show like he did in the case of Marc Lemire who also has been battling with the B’nai Brith “Hate Speech” Internet censors for so long that I can’t recall when he first was attacked. Marc, like Ezra and myself, also was falsely accused by this same chronic complainer Richard Warman; a deluded die-hard deceiver and Zionist psychophant who has filed more suits in his closet of hate than most Jewish tailors manage to do in a lifetime!

So I figured, second best, that it was a good thing Ezra should at least interview Doug Christie and get some measure of response from the man who has been defending innocent victims of this hate lobby for decades now. When Marc Lemire sent me the url to Ezra’s show later the same day I was pleased to see that it had taken place. Then, after watching Ezra’s performance, I readily saw that for all of his feigned concern over the injustices of the infamous sec. 13 legislation and now section 319(2) of the Criminal Code of Canada, both of which Warman and Harry Abrams and the B’nai Brith have been and are using in their ongoing witch hunts to silence criticism of Israel and the Zionist doctrine, there he was on national television doing his damnedest to slander and libel my name ostensibly in the interests of ‘free speech’!

Oi vey I thought to myself, with friends like this who needs enemies? Here he is, one of Canada’s most vocal advocates for freedom of speech on the Internet and he’s sitting there telling the world blatant lies about me and making me out to be some sort of crazed Jew hating anti-Semite!

Within the short span of about six minutes good ol’ free speech advocate Ezra Levant managed to slander, defame and libel me as many times as possible punctuating every comment or question to lawyer Doug Christie with at least one or more ad hominem epithets all in order to show the world just how grand and liberal the mainstream media truly is when it comes to freedom of expression.

Yes, said Ezra, that Topham is an “anti-Semite” and “offensive” and an “anti-Zionist [which is] code for anti-Semitic” and his website is “gross” and his comments “repulsive” and everything that he does is “motivated by a form of malice” and on top of that I also think he’s a “nobody” and an “anti-Semitic idiot and a right wing wacko” and you know really when it comes right down to it “I HATE ARTHUR TOPHAM!”

It was truly amazing to watch and listen to all his hyper-charged frenetic frothing regarding my person all the while waxing eloquent about I was surely going to win my case. Well, being a Zionist insider maybe he’s privy to something most people don’t know. Time will tell.

Now the question needs to be asked, “Where is the deception in this apparently earnest show of support for freedom of speech on the part of Ezra Levant?”

When Ezra first introduced his topic to his television audience his initial statement was that he knew of me because I had been “spamming” him for years which, of course, was an outright lie. Ezra and myself had in the past exchanged emails and I was registered on his blog where I contributed commentary on some of articles. On top of that other supporters of his had gallantly attempted to solicit Ezra to lend his support to my case with Canadian Human Rights Commission but he merely dismissed them by stating that I was an “anti-Semite” and that he didn’t deal with such creatures. When Ezra eventually asked to be taken off my list I respected his request and did so.

In this vein therefore I would ask readers to take a look at an article which I wrote and published on my website that was written back in July of 2008; one that deals with precisely the same issues that are still being argued and discussed today with regard to Ezra’s one-sided view of who exactly ought to be given positive exposure when it comes to Freedom of Speech and who is deserving of the type of defamation that one witnessed during his Nov. 8th interview with Doug Christie.

Please see:

Free Speech for Jews: A Critique of Ezra Levant’s “Jews for free speech” article

During the show the point was made, by Ezra Levant and Doug Christie, that both hate and love are emotions which should never ever fall under the control of any government agency and that they ought to remain sacrosanct and protected by law. And that is true. And for that reason alone I could say that I ought to love Ezra Levant for espousing such a view just as I love Doug Christie for taking a similar and adamant stand on the same issue.

But, as a person who, in years, has also come to realize that our nation is not functioning by the rule of law any longer and also by the fact that the Deputy Assistant Attorney General of the province of British Columbia (an appointed minion of the ‘Crown’ who in all likelihood is pro-Zionist) has saw fit to actually proceed with an attempt to find me guilty of an alleged “thought crime” by the most notorious witch hunting Jewish lobby group on the face of the planet, I find myself having to protest to the maximum this deceitfully sly slight of hand which Ezra Levant has used to tarnish my good name and to prejudice the Canadian public against me right from the start of my impending trial.

Ezra Levant is a lawyer as well as a Zionist mouthpiece for the msm and he is fully cognizant of the fact that while Sec. 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act is now in the process of being wiped off the books by the federal government he is also well aware that Section 319(2) of the Criminal Code of Canada is still in full operation and remains a lethal weapon for use by the B’nai Brith lobby here in Canada. They obviously intend to use it to their fullest potential in order to set a precedent in law that would, should I be convicted of this phoney charge, affect any other Canadian who might at some time in the future try to speak and write the truth about what Zionism truly represents or who might question the genocide of the Palestinian people in Gaza by the Israeli government. And so in that context I find it absolutely disgraceful and outrageous and malicious that someone in Ezra’s position would be doing his utmost to bad mouth me in every way possible at a time when this despicable action is being taken against me by B’nai Brith Canada.

There are of course other more sinister aspects to the hate-mongering of Ezra Levant which should be noted and addressed. The world is full of medicated mind-controlled zombies these days and should one of them happen to hear Ezra Levant going on and on about how how he hates me and what a malicious idiot and anti-Semite I am there is then the possibility that my life could be endangered by such acts of premeditated hatred and slander. Add to that the fact that I am now forced to live unarmed in an area where there is no emergency police assistance close by and you can see why I am a bit concerned about these spiteful lies that Levant has been spreading throughout the msm via Sun News Network. In this sense, rather than loving Ezra, I think I ought to sue Ezra Levant and the Sun News Network for having jeopardized both my physical safety and the safety of my family as well as prejudicing the public against me via his libelous and hurtful lies.

Four years ago when composing the critique mentioned above I wrote, “But, alas, I cannot, at this point and in good conscience, condemn Ezra Levant fully for some of the errors he is making. Whether it is conscious on his part or just plain ignorance of all the facts I truly do not know… when I was 36, I too was unaware of the degree of involvement in global politics that the Zionists actually represented. It took me close to sixty years to finally figure it out so in that context there is always hope that a bright young man like Ezra Levant, will come to realize the error of his ways [but] if you are going to be a “Leader” here in Canada then you are going to have to hit the books some more and get a much firmer grasp on the issue of Political Zionism and learn how this alien and anti-Christian Talmudic doctrine is affecting the Canadian landscape. It behooves you to understand the primary motives of those who are determined to turn this nation into another Communist gulag. Not just for the sake of those “individual Jews who love “freedom of speech” but for the rest of us non-Jew Canadians who also cherish these very same ideals.”
———-

Radical Press Legal Update #1

RPLegalUpdate

newRPlogo

UPDATE NUMBER 1

“There’s no such thing as ‘Hate Speech.’
You either have FREE speech or you don’t – it’s that simple.”

~Anonymous (as posted on ZionCrimeFactory.com)

Dear Radical Readers & Free Speech Supporters,

The plan is to provide readers with legal updates on my court case involving B’nai Brith Canada aka The Crown aka Regina aka the Queen of England and the two Rothschild agents Richard Warman and Harry Abrams versus Arthur Topham Owner, Publisher and Editor of RadicalPress.com.

A brief recap of the issue will be given here for those unaware of the case but will not be republished with subsequent updates.

On May 16, 2012 I was arrested while on my way to work by Det-Cst Terry Wilson and members of his BC HATE CRIME TEAM as well as some local RCMP officers who assisted in the attack. I was read out a charge Sec. 319(2) of the Criminal Code of Canada which states, “Willful promotion of hatred” and then handcuffed and taken to the Quesnel City RCMP jail where I was incarcerated for twelve hours.

During my incarceration Det-Cst Terry Wilson obtained an illegal search warrant and then proceeded to enter my home and remove all of my computers and electronic files plus four of my firearms, two of which were kept upstairs unloaded and two of which were kept loaded downstairs. One was a 30-30 Winchester and the other was a Marlin 22. calibre rifle. The two loaded rifles have been kept loaded and in my place of residence for the past 35 years without incident and are there to protect both my family and myself from predators of all types. I live approximately thirty kilometres (20 miles) out of Quesnel in an isolated area where there is no police station and no possibility of assistance in the case of emergency.

Prior to being put in jail Det-Cst Wilson asked me if I had any firearms in my home and I told him exactly what I stated above.

While in jail I was able to contact my lawyer Douglas Christie who lives in Victoria, B.C. and he was instrumental in assisting me until such time that I was released at approximately 11:00 p.m. on the same day.

Before being released I was given a number of documents which I was asked to sign but didn’t on advise of my lawyer.

The first document was called a PROMISE TO APPEAR and included a second document called an Undertaking Given to a Peace Officer or Officer in Charge.

The PROMISE TO APPEAR document stated the date of the alleged offence, the place, a Description of the Offence and the Section of the Criminal Code Act where it was to be found.

The Offence Date was given as: April 28, 2011 to May 14, 2012.

The Place was: Quesnel, B.C.

The Offence is described as “Willful Promotion of Hatred”

The Section of the Act: CC 319(2)

I was ordered to appear in Quesnel Provincial Court on the 9th of October at 9:00 pm.

The second document called an Undertaking Given to a Peace Officer (basically the bail conditions for my release) stated:

1. That I would appear at the time and place stated in the first document.
2. That I abstain from possessing a firearm and surrender any to Det-Cst Terry Wilson.
3.That I would abstain from communicating directly or indirectly with Richard Warman and Harry Abrams.
4. That I Can not access the internet or be in possession of a device that would be capable of accessing the internet except in the course of lawful employment.

The third document was a copy of the illegal Search Warrant which Det-Cst Terry Wilson used to steal my computers from my home.

This document was submitted by Det-Cst Terry Wilson’s second in command, Cst. Normandie Levas, who provided a Justice of the Peace down on the lower mainland of B.C. with all the purported “proof” that I had committed said offence of “Wilful Promotion of Hatred contrary to Section 319(2) of the Criminal Code”.

The Search Warrant stated that there were “reasonable grounds” to believe that the following items will afford evidence of the Offences:
1. Computer, laptop, Smartphone or device that accesses the internet and is capable of uploading and downloading information, and all their peripheral equipment, computer discs, drives or storage devices which could be used to store information; and

2. Billing records, receipts and correspondence with ABC Communications and Netfirms, and any correspondence in the form of mail or physical documents directly related to Radical Press.

The Search Warrant authorized the thought police to enter my home from 1700 hrs (5 pm) until 2100 hours (11 pm) on May 16, 2012 and was finally approved at 1655 hours (4:55 pm) by F.D. Hodge a Judicial Justice from Burnaby, B.C. I had been placed in jail for close to 6 hours while the Hate Crime Team waited to enter my residence and steal all of my computer equipment.

Over the course of the spring and summer I worked placer mining and my lawyer assisted me in trying to have the original conditions of my release changed so that I could email friends and associates and browse the Internet and write and post articles on my website.

It was not until the date of my first appearance on October 9, 2012 that things changed. After over five months of holding my computers and reapplying for extensions to detain them further Det-Cst Wilson still hadn’t been able to discover whatever additional “evidence” was required in order for the provincial Attorney General’s office to issue a formal Information or what is better know as an Indictment. When the Appearance date arrived there was still no “Information” as the legal beagles word it, so on that day the Order to not go on the Internet and post articles, etc. ended and I was then free to write and post to my website RadicalPress.com.

The unfortunate thing was that neither the Crown Council nor my lawyer informed me of this fact and so it wasn’t until November 1, 2012 that I finally realized I was free to use the Internet once again. Since that date I have been attempting to put out as much information regarding my case as possible because I knew that the Crown was still pressing to have charges laid and that when a formal charge did occur that the Crown would once again try to impose the same (or worse) conditions on my Charter Rights to access and use the Internet.

After receiving word of the Indictment I once again appeared in Quesnel court on Thursday, November 8, 2012 in order to hear Crown Council Jennifer Johnston notify Judge Morgan that an Indictment had indeed been issued on November 5, 2012. My lawyer Doug Christie was in Winnipeg, Manitoba at the time and appeared via telephone to address any concerns. It was just as well as it became clearly evident that CC Johnston was aggressively pursuing the same agenda as before in that she wanted these same extreme conditions imposed upon my new bail conditions that were to be issued that same day by Judge Morgan.

CC Johnston was fully aware that my lawyer Doug Christie was opposed to this as he had already submitted applications prior to that date attempting to have the terms of my initial release lessened. The Judge ended up deciding to issue a new Undertaking because of the Indictment but one that would only include the first 3 conditions of the first Undertaking and not the one dealing with my former restricted right to access the Internet, post to my website or other websites or write emails to whomever I chose (apart from the two complainants). He gave Crown Council until November 13, 2012 (Tuesday) to furnish my lawyer with the Disclosure documents or the Particulars explaining the actual postings on my website that the Crown was alleging violated sec. 319(2) of the Criminal Code and that at 1:30 pm on the 13th we would meet again in court before Judge Morgan to argue against the Crown’s outrageous attempt to silence me while this court case is being staged.

That was the last legal event to date but what followed in the mainstream media regarding my case is of utmost importance with respect to both my pending trial and the critical necessity of retaining my right to use my website to both defend myself and to present MY side of the story as to what is and will be transpiring over the course of my court trial, one that will be held before a Judge and a Jury. It’s evident from what took place on the SunTVNew Network’s, The Source with host Zionist Jew Ezra Levant, a died in the wool kosher Zionist Jew, that the mainstream media is not about to give this case any fair, unbiased coverage.

While on the surface of the six and a half minute interview with my lawyer Doug Christie Ezra Levant was spouting off platitudes about freedom of speech in rapid succession at the same time he was spreading across the television network and the nation as well as globally a number of lies concerning my character and my motives and my writings and website.

Allow me to quote some of the epithets and defamatory remarks Ezra Levant used to describe my person on his tv show:

“I call him an anti-Semite”
“I call Arthur Topham offensive”
“I don’t care much for Arthur Topham. He’s anti-Zionist. I think that’s code for anti-Semitic”
“We’re showing you some screen shots from his website. I disagree with them. I find them gross. I find some of his comments repulsive.”
“I’m sure that Arthur Topham is motivated by a form of malice.”
“I see hate everywhere in Canada, especially in B.C.” [where Arthur Topham just happens to reside. Ed.]
“He’s a nobody”
“I HATE ARTHUR TOPHAM”
“I think he’s an idiot. An anti-Semitic idiot”
“right wing wackos like Topham”

If this is the sort of coverage that I can expect from the mainstream media when it comes to unbiased reporting is it that strange that I would not want to be prohibited from publishing my side of events when it comes to my defence?

Let us see what happens on November 13, 2012 and whether or not our justice system will treat an innocent man fairly or else side with the traitors who now are in control of this nation’s media and money.

For Truth, Justice and Freedom of the Internet

I remain,

Sincerely

Arthur Topham
Pub/Ed
RadicalPress.com
“Digging to the root of the issues since 1998″
———————————————————

B’nai Brith Canada: Still Beating the ‘anti-Semitic’, ‘Hate’ Drum By Arthur Topham

B'naiBrithHateDrum

B’nai Brith Canada: Still Beating the ‘anti-Semitic’, ‘Hate’ Drum

By Arthur Topham

November 8, 2012

Back in September of 2005, just a little over seven years ago, I received word that Michel Chossudovsky, Professor of Economics at the University of Ottawa and website owner of GlobalResearch, was being attacked in the Zionist-controlled media by one of its big guns, the Ottawa Citizen. True to form, those behind this orchestrated assault upon Canada’s Charter of Rights & Freedoms were none other than our present gung ho, chutzpah-raving free speech haters, B’nai Brith Canada, the same secret, Jews-only ‘benevolent’ masonic order of pro-Israeli, pro-Zionist lobbyists who have been, and are still, attacking RadicalPress.com and its illustrious Publisher and Editor, Arthur Topham since 2007.

At the time I decided to write an article in Mr. Chossudovsky’s defense; one that would highlight for Canadians the hidden underbelly of this Rothschild-created, Big Brother censorship Beast and show people how it truly operates behind its deceptive, public persona. I called that article, “B’nai Brith: Beating the anti-Semitic Drum”.

Now one of the things that the Zionist media are focusing on today in their current smear campaign against my person and my website is the fact that I have on my site a relatively miniscule number (out of over 1400 posts) of the standard anti-Zionist writings that the Zionist Jews have been harping on and crying the blues about for close to a century now. In their entrenched, circumscribed minds they feel that by focusing on these particular writers (Eustace Mullins) or writings (Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion); ones that they’ve expended vast amounts of energy, ink and money on trying to wipe out from the history books of humanity, that they’ll convince readers and listeners that RadicalPress.com is, as one of their recent smug-looking little hack writers for Yahoo! Canada News,  Steve Mertl, wrote, “…a nasty little blog called Radical Press, which espouses the idea that a worldwide cabal of Zionist Jews control the levers of power” written by the “bigot” Arthur Topham.

The point of their focusing on these selective items, repeated ad nauseam throughout all of their media outlets both across Canada and in foreign nations like Israel, is to first off discourage readers from even going to the site in question, but furthermore, to control the discussion and thwart any need on their part to actually address the numerous other articles written by myself and others that they fear to debate for lack of any reasonable counter argumentation.

It was therefore (in the 2005 article now being edited, re-written and updated) to assist others in comprehending the breadth and depth of this universal scheme to silence dissent and permit an unleashed, purposeful program of pro-Israeli propaganda to emerge throughout Canada’s mainstream media, one affecting both the mass mind of the citizenry as well as the nation’s legal and social fabric, that I wrote the initial article, in the hope and belief that concerned individuals might be made aware of the nascent beginnings of organizations like B’nai Brith International and its subordinate offshoots like B’nai Brith Canada.

In order to define this fantastic Pharisiac phenomenon known as B’nai Brith International and expose its heinous, deadly purpose, it was necessary for me to furnish the reader with some extensively researched commentary from a book written over fifty-five years ago by a once famed (and now defamed) British author and Journalist by the name of Douglas Reed.

Reed5

In his virtually unknown (today), yet massively documented and scholarly seminal work on the history of Political Zionism and its effects upon the past and present global political situation, (The Controversy of Zion, Dolphin Press (Pty) Ltd., 1978)[1] Mr. Douglas Reed, former Chief European war correspondent for the London Times and successful author of numerous popular books written prior to, during and after WW II, gave future historians a plethora of extremely pertinent contextual information concerning both B’nai Brith International and the Anti-Defamation League (A.D.L.); factual information that clearly defines and relates to what is presently taking place with respect to B’nai Brith Canada’s current assault upon RadicalPress using Section 319(2) of Canada’s criminal code.

Reed was no slouch when it came to covering historical events of his time and as the pieces of the puzzling times began to take shape before his analytical eye he eventually concluded that the hidden hand behind the paradigm-shattering decisions of his period was none other than that of the Zionist Jews and their obsequious sycophants in high office whom they were able to solicit for support.

In order to understand such a perspective though one needs to cast an eye back a full century to the period of U.S. President Woodrow Wilson’s years in office and the time of the first world war and the creation of the Federal Reserve system. It was during this era that the original silent coup by Zionist forces usurped the independence of the White House and placed its exclusive powers in the hands of Wilson’s chief Advisor Mr. Colonel House, a pro-Zionist proponent.

In his book Reed describes President Wilson as “a captive president” and as the war drew nigh stated that after his election “Mr. House took over his correspondence, arranged whom he should see or not receive, told Cabinet officers what they were to say or not to say, and so on.”[2]

I would not hesitate at this point to say that we’re seeing precisely this same phenomenon occurring within Canada’s Conservative government with Harper’s blatantly unabashed public display of seditious grovelling when it comes to anything Zionist or related to Zionism’s captive state, Israel.

Reed, who was born in 1895 just two years prior to Theodor Herzl (Political Zionism’s official founder) setting up the World Zionist Organization in 1897, grew up during the early years of the 20th Century and came of age, politically-speaking, while living in Europe throughout the thirties and forties, witnessing in detail the intimate machinations by the world leaders who were then rearranging the pieces on the world’s political chessboard.

In his exhaustive analysis of how the Zionists slowly, but surely, overtook the U.S. government’s executive levels of command, the better to gain control of policy-making for the exclusive purpose of acquiring the lands of Palestine in order to create their “State” of Israel, Reed emphasized the critical role played by groups such as B’nai Brith International in blocking all criticism of their efforts through the use of blackmail, intimidation and public vilification of the sort we’re now seeing employed against myself and the Radical Press.

It was after this period of initiation into the inner workings of intrigue by the Zionist forces that he began voicing his comments on B’nai Brith International. He writes:

“At that period (1913) [of Colonel House and W. Wilson, A.T.] an event occurred which seemed of little importance then but needs recording here because of its later, larger consequence. In America was an organization called B’nai Brith (Hebrew for “Children of the Covenant”). Founded in 1843 as a fraternal lodge exclusively for Jews, it was called “purely an American institution”, but it put out branches in many countries and today claims to “represent all Jews throughout the world”, so that it appears to be part of the arrangement described by Dr. Kastein[3] as “the Jewish international”. In 1913 B’nai Brith put out a tiny offshoot, the “Anti-Defamation League”. It was to grow to great size and power; in it the state-within-states acquired a kind of secret police and it will reappear in this story.”[4]

In Chapter 43, aptly titled “The Invasion of America”, Reed describes to a tee the techniques presently being applied to myself and Radical Press in order to discredit my person and my work while at the same time expunging from the public mind of Canadians the true motives of Israeli domestic and foreign policies. Please witness the following comments:

“While military invasions and counter-invasions multiplied during the six years of the Second War, absorbing all thought and energy of the masses locked in combat, a silent invasion went on which produced more momentous effects than the armed ones. This was the political invasion of the American Republic and its success was shown by the shape of American state policy at the war’s end, which was so directed as to ensure that the only military invasions that yielded enduring “territorial gains” were those of the revolution into Europe[by the Soviet Union. Ed.] and of the Zionists into Arabia . . .”[5]

“The renewal of large-scale immigration formed the background to the political invasion of the Republic. This was a three-pronged movement which aimed at the capture of the three vital points of a state’s defenses: state policy at the top level, the civil services at the middle level and “public opinion” or the mass-mind at the base. The way in which control over acts of state policy was achieved (through the “adviserships” which became part of American political life after 1913) has already been shown; this part of the process having preceded the others. The methods used to attempt the capture of government services will be discussed later in this chapter. In what immediately follows the capture of the mass-mind in America, through control of published information, will be described; it was indispensable to the other two thrusts. [Emphasis mine. Ed.]

“This form of political invasion is called by Dr. Weizmann[6], who exhaustively studied it in his youth when he was preparing in Russia for his life’s work in the west, “the technique of propaganda and the approach to the masses”. The operation so described may now be studied in actual operation:

“Far back in this book the reader was invited to note that “B’nai Brith” put out a shoot. B’nai Brith, until then, might be compared with such groups of other religious affiliation as the Young Men’s Christian Association or the Knights of Columbus; its declared objects were the help of the poor, sick and fatherless and good works in general. The little offshoot of 1913, the “Anti-Defamation League”, had by 1947 become a secret police of formidable power in America.*

In a footnote Reed adds:

*In fact though not in form. The secret police in countries where the institution is native have their entire power and resources of the state behind them; indeed, they are the state. In America Zionism built the nucleus of a secret police nearly as effective in many ways as those prototypes [the former USSR and China and Israel today. Ed.]. It could only become equally effective if it gained full control of the state’s resources, including the power of arrest and imprisonment, and in my judgment that was the ultimate goal. [It is my contention that this is precisely what has taken place in my own case wherein, through the power and influence of B'nai Brith (via their front men, Richard Warman and Harry Abrams), they were able to produce a false document full of "allegations" that resulted in Det. Cst. Terry Wilson's BC HATE CRIME TEAM being given the go-ahead to arrest and incarcerate me and also obtain a Search Warrant which then allowed the police to steal all of my computers and private communications and then impose soviet style restrictions on my ability to post my defence on the Internet and write emails and even browse the Internet! Ed.]

In Doublespeak “anti-defamation” means “defamation” and this body lived by calumny, using such terms as anti-semite, fascist, rabble-rouser, Jew-baiter, Red-baiter, paranoiac, lunatic, madman, reactionary, diehard, bigot and more of the like [Including now the term "hate". Emphasis mine. Ed.]. The vocabulary is fixed and may be traced back to the attacks on Barruel, Robison and Morse after the French revolution; the true nature of any writer’s or newspaper’s allegiance may be detected by keeping count of the number of times these trade-mark words are used. The achievement of this organization (usually known as the A.D.L.) has been by iteration to make fetishes of them, so that party politicians hasten to deny that they are any of these things. [Emphasis mine. Ed.] Under this regime reasoned debate became outlawed; there is something of sorcery in this subjugation of two generations of Western men to the mumbo-jumbo of Asiatic conspirators.

“When the A.D.L. was born in 1913 it had merely desk-room in the parent B’nai Brith office and a tiny budget. In 1933 Mr. Bernard J. Brown wrote, “Through the intervention of the A.D.L. we have succeeded in muzzling the non-Jewish press to the extent that newspapers in America abstain from pointing out that any person unfavourably referred to is a Jew”. In 1948 the Jewish Menorah Journal of New York wrote, “Should but one phrase in a reprinted literary classic reflect unjustly upon Jews, the A.D.L. will promptly belabour the innocent publisher until he bowdlerizes the offending passage. Let one innocent movie-producer incorporate a Jewish prototype, however inoffensive, in his picture and the hue and cry raised by the A.D.L. will make him wish he’s never heard of Jews . . .

“These quotations show the growth of the A.D.L.’s power in thirty-five years. It has imposed the law of heresy on the public debate in America. No criticism of Zionism or the world-government plan is allowed to pass without virulent attack; . . . [Emphasis mine. Ed.]

“America has today a few surviving writers who fight on for independent debate and comment. They will discuss any public matter, in the light of traditional American policy and interest, save Zionism, which hardly any of them will touch. I have discussed this with four of the leading ones, who all gave the same answer: it could not be done. The employed ones would lose their posts, if they made the attempt. The independent ones would find no publisher for their books because no reviewer would mention these, save with the epithets enumerated above.[7]

“The A.D.L., of such small beginnings in 1913, in 1948 had a budget of three million dollars (it is only one of several Jewish organizations pursuing Zionist aims in America at a similar rate of expenditure). The Menorah Journal, discussing “Anti-Defamation Hysteria”, said, “Fighting anti-semitism has been built up into a big business, with annual budgets running into millions of dollars”. It said the object was “to continue beating the anti-semitic drum” [Emphasis mine. Ed.] and “to scare the pants off prospective contributors” in order to raise funds. It mentioned some of the methods used (“outright business blackmail; if you can’t afford to give $10,000 to this cause, you can take your business elsewhere”), and said American Jews were being “stampeded into a state of mass-hysteria by their self-styled defenders”.[8]

A private organization [B'nai Brith. Ed.] which can produce such results is obviously powerful; there is nothing comparable in the world. Mr. Vincent Sheehan wrote in 1949, “There is scarcely a voice in the United States that dares raise itself for the rights, any rights, of the Arabs; any slight criticism of the Zionist high command is immediately labelled as anti-semitic”. . .
[Emphasis mine. Ed.]

“How is the oracle worked? By what means has America (and the entire West) been brought to the state that no public man aspires to office, or editor feels secure at his desk, until he has brought out his prayer-mat and prostrated himself to Zion? How have presidents and prime ministers been led to compete for the approval of this faction like bridesmaids for the bride’s bouquet? Why do leading men suffer themselves to be paraded at hundred-dollar-a-plate banquets for Zion, or to be herded on to Zionist platforms to receive “plaques” for services rendered? [Such as the recent 'award' given to PM Harper by the Zionists while in New York. Ed.]

“The power of money and the prospect of votes have demonstrably been potent lures, but in my judgment by far the strongest weapon is this power to control published information; to lay stress on what a faction wants and to exclude from it all that the faction dislikes, and so to be able to give any selected person a “good” or a “bad” press. [Emphasis mine. Ed.] This is in fact control of “the mob”. In today’s language it is “the technique of propaganda and the approach to the masses”, as Dr. Weizmann said, but it is an ancient, Asiatic art and was described, on a famous occasion, by Saint Matthew and Saint Mark: “The chief priests and elders persuaded the multitude . . . The chief priests moved the people . . .”

“In forty years the A.D.L. [i.e. B'nai Brith. Ed.] perfected a machine for persuading the multitude. It is a method of thought-control of which the subject-mass is unconscious and its ability to destroy any who cry out is great . . . [Emphasis mine. Ed.]

“The A.D.L. (and the American Jewish Committee) “set out to make the American people aware of anti-semitism”. It informed Jews that “25 out of every 100 Americans are infected with anti-semitism”, and that another 50 might develop the disease. By 1945 it was carrying out “a high-powered educational program, geared to reach every man, woman and child” in America through the press, radio, advertising, children’s comic books and school books, lectures, films, “churches” and trade unions. This programme included “219 broadcasts a day”, full-page advertisements in 397 newspapers, poster advertising in 130 cities, and “persuasions” subtly incorporated in the printed matter on blotters, matchbox covers, and envelopes. The entire national press (“1900 dailies with a 43,000,000 circulation”) and the provincial, Negro, foreign-language and labour newspapers were kept supplied with, “and used”, its material in the form of “news, background material, cartoons and comic strips”. In addition, the A.D.L. in 1945 distributed “more than 330,000 copies of important books carrying our message to libraries and other institutions”, furnished authors with “material and complete ideas”, and circulated nine million pamphlets “all tailored to fit the audiences to which they are directed”. It found “comic books” to be a particularly effective way of reaching the minds of young people, soldiers, sailors and airmen, and circulated “millions of copies” of propaganda in this form. [Emphasis mine. Ed.] Its organization consisted of the national headquarters, public relations committees in 150 cities, eleven regional offices, and “2,000 key men in 1,000 cities”.

The name of the body which supplied this mass of suggestive material never reached the public. During the 1940′s the system of “syndicated writers” in New York or Washington enveloped the entire American press. One such writer’s column may appear in a thousand newspapers each day; editors like this system, which saves them the cost of employing their own writers, for its cheapness. [Those readers who have been following the smear campaign against myself and Radical Press will easily see that this is precisely the technique still being used. The same lies and distortions appear throughout all of the Zionist controlled media throughout Canada. Ed.]Through a few dozen such writers the entire stream of information can be tinctured at its source . . . By all these means a generation has been reared in America (and this applies equally to England [and definitely Canada. Ed.]) which has been deprived of authentic information about, and independent comment on, the nature of Zionism, its original connection with Communism, the infestation of administrations and capture of “administrators”, and the relationship of all this to the ultimate world-government project.” [9]

Reed finally concluded that the greatest of all threats to the USA and other democratic nations, Canada included, was Political Zionism. He writes:

“The three forces which weaken the whole structure of American public life in effect serve the strongest among themselves, Political Zionism, which stands behind the seats of the mighty while the others [communism and organized crime. Ed.] work in lesser places, if to similar ends of power-over-politicians. The proof of this supremacy is to be found by a simple test: the extent to which public discussion is permitted . . . At the topmost level, a virtual ban on public discussion of Political Zionism proves the paramountcy of its sway in American affairs. [Emphasis mine. Ed.] As in England, the open expression of doubt about this territorial ambition, and support for it, has been almost driven underground in recent years. An imperial thrall has been laid on America in this matter. Traditional Americans, whose forebears detested laws of lese-majesty and the genuflections of courts, now find their leaders performing an even humbler obeisance in this direction; like foremost politicians in England, they thus emulate those Rumanian nobles who long bowed to the Sultan’s rule, vainly hoping to keep rank and possessions. The Soviet ban on ‘anti-Semitism’ (which was in effect a veto on public discussion of the origins of Communism) has in practice been extended to the British island and the American Republic [and Canada. Ed.] in the matter of Political Zionism. It is lese-majesty [i.e. treason A.T.] in a new form and because of it present-day Americans and Englishmen [and Canadians. Ed.] do not as a rule see the grave future courses and penalties to which support of Political Zionism has committed them.”[10]

That, in a nutshell, is the most poignant description of the power and purpose of Zionism’s foremost global censorship organ, B’nai Brith International.

It takes little extrapolating to see that all which Reed described in his above comments dovetails smoothly with the apparent convoluted, confusing and tumultuous period that we’re now experiencing in both Canadian and global politics. To elaborate further upon that subject must remain the labour of another article and another time. What is essential here is that readers note the connectedness of events and the fact that the Political Zionists are still very much alive and alert in their diligent and determined effort to destroy the sovereignty of nation-states, serve the interests of Israel and bring in the ill-fated New World Order under the auspices of their original plan, the United Nations.

To those ends organizations such as the B’nai Brith (Canada) and the A.D.L. have evolved and continue to act as Zionist watchdogs and public censors. It is not surprising therefore that they would eventually attack me and my website RadicalPress.com for Political Zionism’s bold and ambitious plans for global dominance owes allegiance only to its proponents and thus their exclusive and racial policies of imperialism (exemplified in Gaza and the Middle East in general) continue to pose a direct threat to both the Christian and Moslem world.

Our ultimate freedom therefore as an independent and sovereign nation depends upon our ability to combat this censorship of free speech which continually keeps the occult nature of Political Zionism hidden from the public eye and places in jail all those who attempt to unmask its diabolical plan.

————–
Footnotes:

[1] The book can be found in the U.S.A. at Abebooks.com or online at http://www.controversyofzion.info .
[2] Controversy of Zion, Page 242
[3] Dr. Joseph Kastein according to Reed was a “zealous” Zionist historian who wrote the book, History and Destiny of the Jews, (Eng. trans., London, 1933). He is extensively quoted by Douglas Reed in his book Controversy of Zion.
[4] Controversy of Zion, Page 243
[5] Controversy of Zion, Page 339
[6] Dr. Chaim Weizmann was a tireless proponent of Zionism. Having supplanted Theodor Herzl as the leader of the World Zionist Organization back in 1904 his influence throughout the formative years of the first half of the 20th Century upon the creation of Israel is well documented. He eventually became Israel’s first Prime Minister in 1948.
[7] Reed had first-hand experience of this practise. In 1952 the Canadian Jewish Congress requested that Canadian booksellers refuse to carry his books. [Emphasis mine. Ed.]
[8] Controversy of Zion, Pages 340 – 342
[9] Controversy of Zion, Pages 342-345
[10] Far and Wide, Page 274.

Zionist Jew Media Campaign to Smear Radical Press by Arthur Topham

zjmediasmear

“Someday, someone, somewhere, is going to break that silence and only then will we begin to hear the sounds of balanced media coverage finally rising above what Solzhenitsyn described as “the incessant dinning of slogans and dogmas that abolish the human essence and deny all individuality to man.” Then, and only then, will the silence of the wolves begin to disperse as the clear light of a new day of freedom of speech dawns for all Canadians.”

Arthur Topham, Silence of the Wolves, July 16, 2009

Early beginnings

It’s been ongoing since the day I first openly criticized the Zionist Jews and their political dogma or ideology known as Zionism. That was back during the heady last days of the 20th Century when I was publishing my monthly hard copy edition of The Radical, an alternative tabloid which ran for forty-two consecutive editions ending in June of 2002.

Throughout most of my tenure as Publisher and Editor of The Radical I was basically ignorant of the Zionist agenda and didn’t begin to clue into what it was all about until after reading the writings of the Jewish intellectual Noam Chomsky, in particular his account of the Middle East situation contained in his book, The Fateful Triangle – Israel, the United States, and the Palestinians. After digesting Chomsky’s account of Israel and who is controlling it and its ideological base I began to pay more and more attention to this issue as time went on.

Of course being a radical alternative publisher with an eclectic sense of what is news and what is b.s. I soon attracted a lot of unwanted attention from what one might call the “Left” in Canada’s political circles. At first it was rather odd as I had always thought of myself as a lefty. My father had been a strong supporter of both the CCF and the NDP throughout most of his life and my paternal grandfather had actually been a good friend of Tommy Douglas’s back when Tommy was still working as a minister of the church in Saskatchewan back in the 1930s.

Anyhow, Canadian Dimension magazine at one point did a major smear edition on myself, The Radical and another alternative newspaper back in January of 2001 that finally established the fact that the so-called “Left” in Canada was in fact riddled with people who were died in the wool Marxists and Communists and stalwart supporters of Zionism and the Jewish state of Israel. Anyone else in the movement who wasn’t was labelled “right wing” or an “anti-Semite” or some other unsavoury epithet.

It was at this period of my life that I first met Paul Fromm, the feisty spokesperson for the Canadian Association for Free Expression (CAFE) and began publishing occasional articles that he had penned. I was also covering the whole issue with Wiebo Ludwig and his Trickle Creek Christian Community and their ongoing battles with the Oil and Gas Industry in Alberta and publishing the early writings of controversial speaker and author David Icke.

Those familiar with David Icke will likely be aware that he too was attacked and smeared by this same chronic complainer Richard Warman who has been attacking me and my website since at least 2007. David still has articles on Warman posted on his website www.davidicke.com .

NDP government takes Radical Press to court

Eventually I ended up in B.C.Supreme Court in 2002 after exposing the dubious character of a former NDP MLA appointed by the Dosanjh government who had been given the portfolio for the Ministry of Children and Families all the while staving off continuous allegation by his many detractors that he had been involved in drug running, child pornography and worse. This same individual is now the Chief Red Apple for the First Nations Summit here in British Columbia and his name is Edward John.

The Dosanjh government  hired a good Jewish lawyer, Marvin Storrow to defend him and I ended up acting on my own behalf in pro ce fashion defending my newspaper and my right to publish. Poor Marvin of course was former PM Trudeau’s appointed council during the APEC fiasco in Vancouver and ended up being outed by the Raging Grannies who spotted him attending a Liberal fundraiser while attempting to act impartially in dealing with all the protesters who had been beaten and pepper sprayed while protesting the visit to Vancouver by Indonesia’s infamous war criminal Suharto who Trudeau lauded as some sort of admirable dignitary.

Eventually it became too onerous and expensive to publish my tabloid and I switched to the Internet in 2002 and carried on until my website was sabotaged by the Zionist sayannim who are everywhere on the net and throughout the media and the assorted political organizations throughout the country.

That is why today when you visit my website you will find that the articles begin in June of 2006.

B’nai Brith Canada: The root of the issue

B''naiBrithLobby

That short synopsis said let me now proceed to the root of this issue that I am facing today, the significant and overt attack against my publishing business and my person by the world’s foremost Zionist Jew lobby organization known as B’nai Brith International.

As I’ve said before most Canadians see this organization as a benevolent society whose main purpose is to look after little old Jewish widows and raise money for the needy, etc. Nothing could be further from the truth! For all the suave rhetoric from its many spokespersons such as Anita Bromberg of B’nai Brith Canada one would certainly get this impression of B’nai Brith as nothing more than the image projected by the Zionist media which works in direct tandem with BBC (B’nai Brith Canada).

But what they don’t tell you is that every nation in the western world has a branch or tentacle formed out of the Mother plant known as B’nai Brith International which is a Jews-only masonic order first established back in the mid 1840s in the USA and that Mother was the creation of the Rothschild dynasty that now controls global finance, the global media, global “International” organizations like the UN, the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund, and dozens upon dozens of other affiliated organizations whose main purpose is to maintain the House of Rothschild and the control of the world’s money supply; for without that ill-gained ability to manifest money out of thin air and then lend it to the governments of the world at exorbitant interest rates (Usury), the whole fabric of the Zionist curtain would quickly disintegrate before the eyes of the world and like the Wizard of Oz the public would suddenly realize just who was behind all of the financial troubles, endless wars and incessant woes and miseries facing the world today.

B’nai Brith Canada first attacked me and my publishing business back in November of 2007 when its B.C. representative Harry Abrams filed a complaint with the Canadian Human Rights Commission alleging the following:

“This concerns  a complaint filed with the Canadian Human Rights Commission seeking relief for discriminatory publication under prohibited grounds caught by Section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act.

The premise of this complaint is a contention that Arthur Topham of Quesnel, British Columbia, Canada and his internet publication known as Radicalpress.com  contrive to promote ongoing hatred affecting persons identifiable as Jews and/or as citizens of Israel.”

HRCHarry&I

That is the story which the Zionist media is now making reference to in their one-sided portrayal of what the issue truly was about. For those readers who wish to review the whole of that tale of Zionist malfeasance I would ask that you go look at the following Reference Guide to the B’nai Brith v Radical Press Complaint case to see the extent of this chronology of subterfuge on the part of this little old benevolent society. That first attack only ended (possibly temporarily) on June 7th of this year when the Harper government voted to toss out the notorious Sec. 13(1) of the Canadian Human Rights Act that the Zionists were using to the max to shut down any and all critics of Israel or the Zionist ideology.

Knowing that Sec. 13 was fated to fade away from their power hungry hands B’nai Brith Canada then decided that they would pick up a new club with which to beat their opponents into oblivion and chose instead Sec. 319(2) of the Canadian Criminal Code. Again, using the same serial sidewinders, Richard Warman and Harry Abrams, they filed this latest charge against me alleging once again that I and my website are promoting hatred toward (not Jews per se) but “people of the Jewish religion or ethnic origin”.

Attempting to use the Canadian law courts instead of the shady likes of the Canadian Human Rights Commission and its Tribunal system which work fundamentally in the same manner as the Soviet Stalinist Show Trials of the 30′s, 40′s and 50′s did, was a risk that B’nai Brith Canada was now forced to take if they wanted to carry on with their harassment and vilification of those Canadians who wish to exercise their Charter of Rights and Freedoms and write about the truth as they see it. The outcome of their desire to control the Internet here in Canada may well depend on how they are able to prosecute this case against me. If they are successful in gaining a guilty verdict then that will be the final nail in the coffin for freedom of speech here in Canada and anyone else who attempts to criticize the Zionist elephant that is now sitting in the living room of every Canadian household across the country will receive the same treatment that these power crazed psychopaths are now attempting to mete out to me and my publishing business RadicalPress.com.

The Smear Campaign Today

And now to the gist of their present smear campaign against The Radical Press. It has always been the modus operandi of the Zionists, when attacking their critics, to first malign and vilify them using the vast resources contained in their media monopoly which includes the majority of Canada’s mainstream newspapers and television news stations, etc. It’s their first overt strike and is akin to their same warfare techniques where they pull off what they call “preemptive” strikes against their perceived enemy and attack without any direct provocation and destroy the infrastructure and communications systems of their victim before sending in the ground troops.

We’ve saw this happen in Egypt during the 1967 war, then in Iraq in 2003 and lately in Libya where they pulled the same stunt using all of their Zionist-controlled UN sycophants and their media including their Zionist-run orgs like Avaaz, to divert and confuse the attention of the general public.

That is what they are now attempting to do to me: create this massive deception that I am some sort of bonker, crazed, hate mongering, lunatic fringe (they haven’t started with the ‘dope-smoking hippie’ yet), placer miner living out in the backwoods of the Cariboo who doesn’t know diddley squat about how the world really is run but is just out there in cyberspace spewing forth all his neo-Nazi, Jew-hating, anti-Semitic venom in order to incite the public to rise up and perform another great pogrom against the poor downtrodden and victimized Jews of Canada and the world!

Then (when they figure they’ve established this massive lie in the minds of as many gullible Canadians as possible) they will begin their court trial and ship in all their carefully selected “expert witnesses” to testify that all of my information is somehow incorrect and that Eustice Mullins was a notorious “anti-Semite” and the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion is really just a forgery as everyone who was brought up in a Zionist controlled culture obviously knows.

Contrary to this programmed reaction to their lies though are the wise words of that famous poet and activist Ezra Pound once said about this road map for the 20th Century:

“If or when one mentions the Protocols, alleged to be of the Elders of Zion, one is frequently met with the reply: Oh, but they are a forgery! Certainly they are a forgery, and that is the one proof we have of their authenticity. The Jews have worked with forged documents for the past 24 hundred years, namely ever since they have had any documents whatsoever. And no one can qualify as a historian of this half century without having examined the Protocols.

What we know for certain is that they were published [in English] two decades ago. [In the early 1920's. Ed.] That Lord Sydenham wrote a preface to them. That their content has been traced to another sketch said to have appeared in the eighteen forties. The interest in them does not lie in [the] question of their having been, or not been concocted by a legislative assembly of Rabbis, democratically elected, or secretly chosen by the Mysterious Order of the Seven Branched Antlers or the Bowling Society of Milwaukee. Their interest lies in the type of mind, or the state of mind of their authors.

What is interesting, perhaps most, to the historian is their definite campaign against history altogether, their declared intention to blot out the classics, to blot out the record, and to dazzle men with talk of tomorrow.”

As I said this is just the gist of what they are now planning to do. Time will reveal all of this in the days ahead.

IsraelNOcriticismAllowed
My primary concern

Of course my primary concern is not that the Zionist controlled media will be smearing me from the start to the finish. I can and have handled that quite easily over the past decade or longer. What really concerns me is that the Crown will do its damnedest to set or place bail conditions upon me tomorrow when I go to court in Quesnel demanding that I cannot post to my website RadicalPress.com or write emails to anyone I so choose or post information regarding my court case to other websites of a kindred nature so that the thousands of supporters who now are keenly interested in this case will be able to get an unbiased, non-Zionist media presentation of what is happening to myself and my legal situation.

I have discussed this at length with my lawyer Doug Christie and he has assured me that under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms and GIVEN THE FACT that I have not been convicted of these phoney charges, that the court cannot legally prevent me from writing and posting on my website or sending articles to other sites. While I believe this to be true nonetheless that is precisely what Det -Cst Terry Wilson pulled off when I was arrested back on May 16, 2012. Prior to releasing me from jail he gave me an Order stating that I was not to browse the Internet or write any emails to anyone who was not directly associated with my placer mining business. That pile of legal(?) horse feathers held sway over my freedom of speech and expression right up until October 9th, 2012 when my first “Appearance” in court was due to happen but the Crown still hadn’t got their act together to formally charge me. That is when the Order ceased.

B’nai Brith Canada, the RCMP, the Zionist Media and the Crown all know that the only stone I have left in my sling is the freedom to defend myself against this Zionist Goliath that is now openly wielding its censorship spear in my face by using my right to publish my side of the story on my website. Without that right the ensuing struggle will remain a Stalinist side-show of the Zionist controlled media and the general public, as usual, will receive a slanted, biased tale; one told by an idiot, signifying nothing but the reality that Canada is under full domination by a foreign and deadly enemy.

May God guide and protect those of us who will be battling this dark and evil entity called Zionism!

Arthur Topham
Pub/Ed
RadicalPress.com
“Digging to the root of the issues since 1998″
——————

Contact Arthur at radical@radicalpress.com or should he be restrained from using the net write to him at:

Arthur Topham
4633 Barkerville Highway
Quesnel, B.C. Canada
V2J 6T8

National(Zionist)Post:Preemptive Hit Smear on Radical Press

Canada
http://news.nationalpost.com/2012/11/06/b-c-man-charged-with-promoting-hatred-against-jews-on-website/

NationalPostlogo
B.C. man charged with promoting hatred against Jews on website

Stewart Bell | Nov 6, 2012 2:02 PM ET | Last Updated: Nov 6, 2012 6:03 PM ET

RPscreenshot
RadialPress.com A screengrab from The Radial Press website.

Owner Arthur Topham, Quesnel, B.C., has been charged with willfully promoting hatred against Jews.

The publisher of a British Columbia website that has drawn repeated complaints over its portrayals of Jews has been charged with promoting hatred following a six-month police investigation, officials said Tuesday.

Arthur Topham, 65, was charged with a single count of willfully promoting hatred against “people of the Jewish religion or ethnic group” as well as improper storage of firearms found in his house near Quesnel, B.C.

“The branch has approved charges against him,” said Neil MacKenzie of the B.C. Criminal Justice Branch. He said the province’s assistant deputy attorney general had sign off on the hate crimes charge.

Mr. Topham was to make a court appearance Thursday.

“We’re glad that the government and the police have taken our concerns seriously and proceeded,” said Anita Bromberg of B’nai Brith Canada, which had asked police to investigate the website last May.

Mr. Topham is a miner and is listed as secretary of the Cariboo Mining Association. He also publishes Radical Press, a website that posts materials with conspiracy theory themes such as the “Biological Jew” and the “Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion.”

The Biological Jew depicts Jews as parasites that suck the blood from their “host” societies while the Protocols is a fraudulent book that purports to describe a conspiracy for worldwide Jewish domination.

In May, Harry Abrams, a B’nai Brith volunteer in Victoria, B.C., and Ottawa lawyer Richard Warman both complained to police about the website. Mr. Warman’s complaint said both the Biological Jew and the Protocols were banned from import into Canada as hate propaganda.

“When you’ve got that kind of just rabid attack against the Jewish community I think it’s incumbent on people to stand up in society,” said Mr. Warman, who regularly files complaints about racist websites.

“It seems that a lesson needs to be learned and the criminal system might be the best way to do it”

Police arrested Mr. Topham and questioned him on May 16. According to a transcript of his police interview that was posted online, he asked the investigating officer, Det. Const. Terry Wilson of the B.C. Hate Crime Team, whether he had been trained in Tel Aviv or whether Mossad had come to Canada to train him.

He lectured the officer about how Jews “control what you’re doing” and said they had “created the unit you’re working for.” He asked the officer if he was a Christian and scolded him for what he was doing.

“These guys have spent the last 2,000 years trying to destroy our religion, and you like a Judas are out here like a, like one of their dogs chasing down people who are trying to defend the Christian religion,” he said. “You ought to be ashamed of yourself.”

Doug Christie, Mr. Topham’s defence lawyer, confirmed in an email his client had been formally charged. Asked if he wanted to comment, Mr. Christie responded: “Opposition to Zionism should not be illegal.”

But Ms. Bromberg said the website went well beyond that.“This isn’t a free speech issue about the politics behind Israel. It is borrowing on age-old canards that raise our concerns that this is designed to spread hate,” she said. “Our concerns were valid, they were carefully considered by the police and obviously, because these were hate crimes charges, by the attorney-general.”

Mr. Topham announced on his website he had been charged. He portrayed himself as a defender of free speech and asked for donations. “Judging from the wording of this indictment it looks like it’s going to be a battle between the Christians and the Jews,” he wrote.

Complaints about Radical Press go back to 2007, when B’nai Brith took the website to the Canadian Human Rights Commission. But the case stalled due to uncertainty over the law. Police assumed sole responsibility for investigating hate crimes complaints about websites after the Conservatives voted in June to repeal a law that had previously allowed the rights commission to deal with such matters.

National Post
sbell@nationalpost.com

————————–

newRPlogo

EDITOR’S COMMENTS:

Now that the Zionist Jew mainstream media has finally got around to openly attacking my person, my website and my work I’m reminded of a quotation I once read by the late Jewish recording artist Frank Zappa. He basically hit the nail on the head with regard to the ways and means by which those in power will resort to once their monumental scam of deception is in danger of being exposed:

“The illusion of freedom will continue as long as it’s profitable to continue the illusion. At the point where the illusion becomes too expensive to maintain, they will just take down the scenery, they will pull back the curtains, they will move the tables and chairs out of the way and you will see the brick wall at the back of the theater.”

-Frank Zappa

We saw this before so many times here in Canada with the deplorable case of Ernst Zundel and Marc Lemire and Terry Tremaine and numerous others where the Zionist media first does its preemptive smear campaign against whoever they wish to destroy and then follows up with the show trials (if they can find the proper legal lackeys to carry out their agenda).

It’s been five years plus now since I’ve been labouring to bring my views and concerns about the dangerous degree of control that the Zionist lobby in Canada has over our total governmental and media structure to the attention of the Canadian public. As such I would like to thank the Zionist Jew organization B’nai Brith Canada for their tireless persistence in keeping my story alive and in finally breaking it out of the years of silence and darkness that has, up to this point, shrouded it and kept it as secret as their own masonic identity is kept secret from the Canadian public.

——–

SUNNEWS ZIO ONE-SIDED HIT PIECE ON RADICAL PRESS

http://www.sunnewsnetwork.ca/sunnews/canada/archives/2012/11/20121106-205436.html
SunNewsHitPiece

EDITOR’S NOTE:

This evening I got an email from a fellow associate alerting me to this story that appeared in the Sun media news network. I thought I would share it with those who don’t go to that site or who already know that it’s just another Zionist propaganda organ like the National Post, the Globe & Mail and dozens of other Zionist controlled outlets across the country that work in tandem to promote their distorted version of reality.

Of course they immediately go to the two Zionist creeps who have been harassing me since 2007 and get their opinion but fail to contact me about my side of the story. I’m surprised they didn’t ask Ezra Levant for his 2¢ worth!

Anyhow I see comments are only open to Facebook users. I put something in and did a screen shot. I’m not set up on Facebook to allow them to gain access to my account that far so it was never posted but others may be able to send in their comments.

Arthur Topham

Editor

Finally! No more “Hate” crimes

cobbhatecrimesfinal

Free Speech: Only in Canada you Say? by Johnny Dee

TruthAntiSemitic

Free Speech: Only in Canada you Say?

by

Johnny Dee

October 20, 2012

Not by a long shot!

Serious enquirers after truth and justice in Canada still clinging to the false belief that they have either a God-given or constitutional right to freedom of speech on the Internet had better give their head a shake and take note of the following criminal case involving the international Zionist organization known as B’nai Brith versus Arthur Topham and his website RadicalPress.com.

Being a patriotic Canadian and a firm believer in the freedom of the press, as well as knowing how extensively the Zionists are involved in the majority of the world’s nations, including Canada, via their lobby groups, media and financial networks, Topham concluded that the Zionist doctrine posed an imminent danger to Canada’s democratic institutions and to a citizen’s rights and freedoms as embodied in Canada’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms and set out to warn his fellow citizens of this threat to our collective freedoms.

As a result of articles written by Arthur and others on this controversial subject and published on his website RadicalPress.com, a Jewish organization known as B’nai Brith Canada (an offshoot of the Rothschild’s B’nai Brith International, a secret, Jews-only, masonic order established in the USA back in 1843) decided to try and shut him up and his website down.

History of B’nai Brith malfeasance

In July, 2007 a representative of this organization, Harry Abrams, from Victoria, B.C., along with his sidekick Richard Warman playing a behind-the-scenes supporting role, filed a Sec. 13 “hate crime” complaint with the Canadian Human Rights Commission (CHRC) alleging that Topham and his website were promoting “ongoing hatred affecting persons identifiable as Jews and/or as citizens of Israel.” It was precedent-setting at the time in that were Topham to be found “guilty” of such a “crime” it would then have established in law for all Canadians a demarcation line in terms of what they might publish on the net in terms of criticism of either the political Zionist doctrine or those responsible for its actions and results.

The upshot of it was five year of litigation involving the CHRC and the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal that finally ended in Topham’s favour on June 7, 2012 when the federal Conservative government, cognizant of the fact that Sec. 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act was a flawed piece of legislation (in that it was a double-edged sword capable of being used against the Zionist Jews too), by a vote of 153 to 136, repealed it, thus removing from the complainants their means of censoring Topham. These changes to the Act took effect 22 days after Topham was arrested and imprisoned on May 16th, 2012.

Enter the BC HATE CRIME TEAM

Both Harry Abrams and Richard Warman, being insiders to all of this Zionist collusion, could see the writing on the wall and decided to look for another way to continue their legal harassment. That’s where the BC Hate Crime Team entered into the picture. Knowing well in advance that the old legal CHRC venue would soon be closed to them they filed a similar complaint with the B.C. Hate Crimes Team in April of 2011 and from that date until May 14, 2012 the “Hate Team”, led by Det. Con. Terry Wilson (another Zionist agent of the Canadian government who has been working in tandem with Richard Warman for over a decade now) and his partner in crime, Cst. Normandie Levas, spent just over a year spying on Topham’s website before they sprang into action on May 16th sending their goon squad on a 600 km trip up to the interior of the province where Topham has lived for the past forty-two years.

Using Sec. 319(2) of the Criminal Code which, like the former Sec. 13 legislation, also deals with “Willful Promotion of Hatred” the complainants are now banking on using this nefarious piece of draconian legislation (also introduced into Canadian jurisprudence by the Zionist Jew lobbyists over the past few decades) to destroy Topham’s publishing business, put him in jail for two years and ban him from publishing or writing on anything related to Zionism or the Jews for the remainder of his life.

The most odious, troubling aspect of this ongoing, malicious attack upon Arthur Topham and his democratic rights is that the RCMP, in collusion with these serial Zionist complainants, can base their actions solely upon unproven accusations and then arrest a law-abiding citizen, throw them in jail, traumatize their spouse and proceed to gain an illegal search warrant (there are no provisions in the Canadian criminal code under sec. 319(2) that permit this) allowing them to invade one’s home and steal all of their computers and electronic files which they will then withhold and copy and use to spy on all of the person’s network of friends and associates. On top of all of these infamies they have the additional gall to arbitrarily set extremely onerous bail conditions such that the accused person can no longer go on the internet freely, communicate via email with any of their family, friends or associates or do anything online related to defending themselves against such specious charges.

The Clincher

The clincher of course is the fact that the police are now able to commit all of the above infamies and impose undemocratic restrictions upon Topham and his website even though he STILL HAS NOT BEEN CHARGED!!!

These types of actions, literally forced upon citizens, are extremely dangerous, ominous examples of the fact that Canadians are living in a police state where free speech is but an illusion and any deviance from what the Zionist Jews deem acceptable can result in such extreme measures being taken against a person; measures that once were thought to only occur in totalitarian dictatorships like the former Bolshevik-run Soviet Union or Communist China.

The concept of being innocent until proven guilty has literally shape-shifted into Orwellian double-speak where now the truth about Zionism becomes “hate” and false accusations by Zionist Jew lobbyists supersede common sense along with moral and legal integrity.

With all of Topham’s personal correspondence stolen, files necessary to defend himself withheld by the Crown and the necessity of having to hire a lawyer at great expense forced upon him (he’s a low income pensioner) one wonders how Canada could have sunk to such deplorable depths of injustice.

————-

Any financial help in this ongoing struggle others wish to offer to Topham can be sent to:

Arthur Topham
4633 Barkerville Hwy
Quesnel, B.C. Canada
V2J 6T8

To donate via PayPal please go to the following website www.quesnelcariboosentinel.com and click on the PayPal button.

Det-Cst Terry Wilson BC HATE CRIME TEAM:Zionist operative for B’nai Brith Canada

WilsonFramed

Dear Radical Reader,

I was saving this graphic for another article which I had planned to write but with the formal CC Sec. 319(2) charge now laid against me I could very well be prohibited from posting anything over the next couple of days.

This poor excuse for a Canadian has been colluding for over a decade now with the same Zionist traitors that laid this false and despicable charge against me. They falsely accuse truth seekers and then gain illegal search warrants and steal people’s computers and snoop through all of their private emails as well as clone the hard drives and pass them along to their Zionist comrades. These vile traitors to Canada are no different from the Bolshevik cheka who used to terrorize the Russian people after the coup of 1917.

RadicalPress News Alert: Formal charges laid against RadicalPress Publisher Nov. 5, 2012

TruthHateCrime
newRPlogo

Dear Radical Readers and Free Speech Supporters,

Today, Monday, November 5, 2012 I received word via an email from the office of lawyer Douglas Christie that a formal Indictment has been sworn against me.

The following is what is contained in the pdf file which I’m typing out for your benefit. The actual pdf document is contained in the scanned images below.

INFORMATION

Court Identifier:5921:PRA
Court File Number: 25166
Type Reference:
Inf. Seq Number:  5
Agency File Number: RMCS:11-4897
DNA: [X]

“By Indictment”

This is the information of Marina Onciul, a Court Liaison Officer (the “Informant”) of Quesnel, British Columbia.

The informant says that the informant has reasonable grounds to believe and does believe that

Count 1
Roy Arthur TOPHAM, between the 28th day of April, 2011 and the 4th day of May, 2012, inclusive, at or near Quesnel, ink the Province of British Columbia, did by communicating statements, other than in private conversation, willfully promote hatred against an identifiable group, people of the Jewish religion or ethnic origin, contrary to Section 319(2) of the Criminal Code.

Count 2
Roy Arthur TOPHAM, on or about the 4th day of May, 2012, at or near Quesnel, in the Province of British Columbia, did store firearms, in a manner contrary to the regulations under Storage, Display, Transportation and Handling of Firearms by Individual Regulations made under paragraph 117(h) of the Firearms Act, contrary to Section 86(2) of the Criminal Code.

THE INFORMATION SWORN ON NOVEMBER 5, 2012 CONTAINS A TOTAL OF 2 COUNTS ON 1 PAGE.

SWORN BEFORE ME ON 5TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2012 AT QUESNEL BRITISH COLUMBIA

D. Carey 2012.11.05 10:43:46 -08’00′
A JUSTICE OF THE PEACE IN AND FOR THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA

Roy Arthur TOPHAM: Warrant
PROCESS CONFIRMED

D. Carey 2012.11.05 10:44:10 -08’00′
A JUSTICE OF THE PEACE IN AND FOR THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA
————————————————

I would ask that you hang on to this information as I could in fact be arrested tomorrow and prohibited from posting any more information on the net or sending emails as was the case for the past 5 months.

Now that I’ve been charged the case will go to court and I plan to have it held here in my local community of Quesnel before a Judge and a Jury of my peers.

I would also ask of you that you hang on to the website url to the following blog which contains my PayPal account. I will most likely need this to help in soliciting for donations to pay legal costs. The url is http://www.quesnelcariboosentinel.com and the PayPal button is on the top right hand corner of the home page.

Anyone wishing to send financial assistance via Canada Post can send it to:

Arthur Topham
4633 Barkerville Hwy
Quesnel, B.C. CANADA
V2J 6T8

Please, if you care to donate don’t send any cheques or money orders in care of “Radical Press”.

Judging from the wording of this Indictment it looks like it’s going to be a battle between the Christians and the Jews. As the graphic at the top of this post and the one below indicate, it is B’nai Brith Canada who is sponsoring this attack against me and my website and by extension all Canadians who value the inherent right to freedom of speech and expression wherever it may be. Please bear that in mind always.

The two people who laid the complaint against me are Richard Warman and Harry Abrams. Both of them are working for B’nai Brith Canada (although Warman would deny this).

B''naiBrithLobby

I would ask of all my fellow Christians that you keep me and my family and Douglas Christie in your thoughts and prayers as we proceed into this crucial battle for freedom of speech here in Canada.

Please pass this on to your friends and associates. The police took all of my email contacts back in May and I’ve lost 90% of the addresses I used to have. Thank you.

For Peace, Truth, Justice, and Free Speech for ALL Canadians,

Arthur Topham
Pub/Ed
RadicalPress.com
“Digging to the root of the issues since 1998″

Johnstonlet2Christie

Indictment

Marc Lemire Appeals outrageous ruling by the Federal Court on Section 13 censorship

marc lemire

Marc Lemire Appeals outrageous ruling by the Federal Court on Section 13 censorship

Judge makes multiple errors and fails to mention he was a key player at DoJ who passed legislation which applied Section 13 to the internet!

http://blog.freedomsite.org/2012/11/marc-lemire-appeals-outrageous-ruling.html

NOVEMBER 30, 2012:  Cutting through the post-hurricane Sandy’s driving rain, Marc Lemire filed his landmark appeal to the Federal Court of Appeals, challenging the outrageous ruling of Mr. Justice Mosley.

RichardMosley

Justice(?)Mosley

This appeal takes the question of the constitutionality of Section 13 to the Court of Appeals and questions several aspects of the Federal Court Judge’s decision.  This Appeal is a damning critique of censorship and thought control which lay at the feet of Section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act ”Canada’s shameful and thoroughly discredited internet censorship legislation.

Marc Lemire’s 8+ Year Legal Ordeal

For those trying to keep track of Marc Lemire’s eight-year legal ordeal, here is a brief rundown on what has happened.  In 2003, serial plaintiff Richard Warman filed a Section 13 complaint against Marc Lemire for postings on a message board he ran, and 1 post on his website The Freedomsite.  Lemire removed the entire message board before receiving Warman’s complaint, and removed the single posting as soon as he received the complaint. (posting called “Aids Secrets” written by an American). Since Lemire removed the material, that should have been the end of the case. Since the Canadian Human Rights Act is a completely remedial piece of legislation (IE: not meant to punish anyone)

Well, the Canadian Human Rights Commission had different ideas of what “remedial” means, and the CHRC went on a fishing expedition to try to find anything else to prosecute Lemire with.  The CHRC found a few documents, and Warman submitted a website he claimed Lemire ran.  When Warman submitted the website, he also asked the CHRC to hide this from Lemire which the CHRC promptly did.  In the interim, CHRC staffers signed up on message boards such as Stormfront,org and attempted to engage (entrap?!) Lemire in conversation, using an alias known as “Jadewarr”.

Notwithstanding the fact that Lemire remediated everything, the CHRC pushed on, and a Tribunal was set up to investigate Lemire and all the absurd claims being made against him.  As part of his defence, Lemire questioned the constitutional validity of Section 13 of the Human Rights Act.

After an over 30 day multi-year proceeding the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal threw out almost the entire case against Lemire. Hundreds of postings, websites and other material was put forward by the CHRC. The Tribunal ruled against every single alleged “hate” message Lemire was accused of, except for one.  The Tribunal also found that Section 13 and 54 of the Canadian Human Rights Act was unconstitutional.

The censors were not happy with that, and in 2009 (yes three years ago!!) the CHRC appealed to the Federal Court of Canada seeking a judicial review of the decision of the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal.

With the constitutionality of Section 13 in question, the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal stopped all enforcement of Section 13 and put on hold the cases which were before it (Arthur Topham, Henry Makow, etc) until a final decision in the Lemire case. Also while waiting for the Federal Court to rule, the Parliament of Canada passed Bill C-304, which repealed Section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act. (Currently at Second reading in the Senate of Canada)

In early October, 2012, the Federal Court after taking three years finally ruled. The court found that Section 13 of the Canadian Human Right Act was just fine but the penalty provision of the law was unconstitutional. Therefore the Federal Court stuck down Section 54 of the Human Rights Act, but left Section 13 intact.

That’s where we are now.  If I chose not to appeal, the other cases which were halted awaiting a final decision in my case would be activated, and the victims would be dragged before the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal, and in some other cases, the Federal Court.

Federal Court Ruling by Mosley

The ruling by Liberal Appointee Justice Richard Mosley is at times totally inept and at other times vicious and revolting. On the inept side, the Judge could not even get the correct date of the Tribunal’s decision. In his decision, he claimed the decision date was “September 9, 2009,” when in fact, the Tribunal ruled on September 2, 2009.

The Judge totally confuses the history of Section 13 and how the penalty provisions were adopted. And his confusion of the law was then used as reasons to justify Section 13 at a later point.  Unbelievable!

Mosley overturned finding of fact which the Tribunal made with respect to mediation.  And he totally gets it all wrong and comes to a wrong conclusion.  He simply heard the submissions of one party, and refused to look at the entire history of all the mediation in this case.

On the vicious side, Mosley looked at the historical amendments to Section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act and found no issue with applying it to the internet.  When it was first passed in the late 1970′s, Section 13 only applied to the limited aspects of a telephone answering machine.  Then in 2001, under the guise of the “Anti-Terrorism Act,” Section 13 was applied to the entire internet and to interconnected computer networks.

And guess who was a key decision maker and “point man” for the “Anti-Terrorism Act”  The same Act, which we say has made Section 13 unconstitutional?  The one and only; Justice Richard Mosley.

In 2001, Justice Richard Mosley was the associate deputy minister for criminal law at the Department of Justice.  During his time as deputy minister, he was the “point man“ for the “Anti-Terrorism Act”  Mosley defended the legislation multiple times, including at multiple press conferences and even before Parliament.  As Macleans reported “Even so, speaking at a press briefing around the same time, Mosley didn’t hesitate to dismiss concerns raised by reporters that the new law could violate civil liberties.”

One of the main arguments against Section 13′s constitutionality is that is now applies to the most interactive and inclusive medium the world has ever known the Internet.  This is a key part of the Lemire Constitutional Challenge.  And also expertly argued by the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, the BC Civil Liberties Association, and the Canadian Free Speech League.

Is it really any wonder that Judge Mosley completely ignored all our submissions with his crappy one line answer: “As found by the Tribunal at para 231 of the decision, the conclusion in Taylor on rational connection to the legislative objective still applies. I am of the same view.” After all; the application of Section 13 to the Internet was part of HIS legislation.  HE defended it to the media and in front of a Parliament sub-committee.  And it was Mosley that so quickly dismissed concerns about civil liberties over the so-called Anti-Terrorism Act.

Considering that Judge Mosley was a critical player and the “front man” for the 2001 amendments to Section 13  isn’t it fair to claim a reasonable apprehension of bias?  And that Mosley should not sit in judgment over the very legislation that HE was so closely associated with, defended, justified and sold to Canadians?

In Canada, justice must be transparent and be seen to be transparent.  It is bloody ridiculous that a Judge would sit on his high horse, and BERATE MY LAWYER, during the hearing, yet not say a word about how he was closely associated with part of the very law which we were challenging!  Only in Absurdistan does this stuff happen!

Lemire Appeal to the Federal Court of Appeals

[Read more...]

THE RETURN OF RADICAL PRESS

THE RETURN OF RADICAL PRESS
RadAdBrdSword

Greetings Everyone and welcome back to the RadicalPress.com website!

My sincere apologies to all former readers of this site for the inordinately long silence. The reasons for this will be explained over the course of the following posts but suffice it to say that from last May 16th, 2012 when I, the publisher and editor of this website, was arrested and jailed by the RCMP’S B.C. HATE CRIME TEAM led by Det-Cst Terry Wilson and his partner in crime Cst Normandie Levas, I have been unable to use ANY of my websites and for months unable to even browse or write emails to friends and associates!

Such is the state of Zionist Jew infiltration and the accompanying chaos created by B’nai Brith International that prevails now throughout Canada thanks to their machinations on all levels and the sell-out to their evil agenda by otherwise patriotic Canadian politicians.

I would also like at this point to acknowledge and thank my lawyer Mr. Douglas Christie, Chief Council for the Canadian Free Speech League who, from the day that I was handcuffed and jailed, has been working with me diligently to end this ongoing harassment by the Jewish lobbyists here in Canada.

christie&hat300

The work to ensure that the Internet remains free of the clutches of Orwellian censors like the Zionist Jew organizations such as B’nai Brith International and their offshoot the ADL will continue.

Arthur Topham

Editor

FREE JIM TOWNSEND – CANADIAN POLITICAL PRISONER

FREEJIMTOWNSEND

FREE JIM TOWNSEND – CANADIAN POLITICAL PRISONER

by Arthur Topham
February 27, 2012

“And I won’t be laughing at the lies when I’m gone
And the sands will be shifting from my sight when I’m gone
Can’t add my name to the fight while I’m gone
So I guess I’ll have to do it while I’m here”

~Phil Ochs, When I’m Gone circa 1960′s

Jim Townsend has spent most of his lifetime fighting for peace and freedom, both within Canada and globally. Like many of us from the 60′s Generation he was able to see the future for the simple reason that he spend his time living in the now. And ‘now’, because of his beliefs, in his country and in life itself, and in his knowing that freedom means the God given right and duty to speak one’s truth, he has been pursued and harassed and hunted down like a dog by those forces within our nation who, for vested and criminal reasons, have set out to silence one of Canada’s great and patriotic citizens.

One might, if they wished to find a comparison to Jim’s voice of reason and common sense, find his equal in that great English patriot and hero of the American War of Independence, Thomas Paine. It was Paine’s ideas; the fruit of his discerning and independent spirit, that tipped the balance of both opinion and history itself, during a period of history when the early American colonies, fast waxing in freedom and prosperity thanks to an abundance of natural resources and space, were faced with the prospect of having to make an ultimate decision; one that would decide their fate as a nation.

The British Crown in 1776 was determined to go to war against the newly founded colonies in the new found world where so many Europeans had fled in vast numbers to escape the endless maelstrom of wars, tyranny, taxation, wage slavery and religious persecution that was then order of the day. Men like George Washington and Thomas Jefferson and Benjamin Franklin all were influenced and impressed into action by the rational arguments made by Paine; arguments as old as dawn’s history and as cold and tangible as the chains that bind every free born human forced to bow down before another’s will.

The fact that today Jim Townsend is in jail in Kamloops, British Columbia, attests not only to what Thomas Paine warned the American people of but also speaks volumes in terms of just how much (or little) humanity has actually progressed over the past 236 years of living in what purports to be a “democratic” country.

Jim, like myself, and many other seekers after truth and justice of the 60s generation, has gone through the mentally challenging incremental stages of growth and learning that are a prerequisite to the actual gaining of a broad, encompassing knowledge of how the world of politics and religion actually works. He began his journey to awareness, not by gazing out idealistically from the hallowed halls of academia and studying college text books in comfort but by entering the real world of common man; a world where freedom depended upon how much money was in your pocket not how many certificates hung from your office wall.

When it comes to understanding how a person’s country is ran politically and economically and who the players are that tend to shape its destiny such degrees of understanding, no different than the academic credentials that adorn the intellectual classes of today’s world, demand a willful, determined effort; one continuously accosted by the conditioned customs of the day.

Jim met these challenges and as a result accomplished what most people today still yearn for: an all encompassing realization and a lucid comprehension of how our world actually is organized when it comes to the basic mechanisms that permit the wheels of both industry and intellect to revolve in harmonious fashion. It is due to his understanding of these principles as well as his cognizance of how they have been usurped and perverted and the fact that he has used his verbal and technical skills via the Internet to transmit his truth that he and his family have been threatened, accosted, literally shot at and prevented from living their lives in peace and comfort.

Jim’s initial book that reveals what he learned about how Canada has been set up can be read at on RadicalPress.com. The title is FREEDOM! CANADA and can be found in the right column on the home page.

Jim’s story is much too long and way too interesting for me to tell it in a short introductory essay. My purpose in writing these lines is to hopefully convey to Canadians the urgency of Jim and his family’s plight. The police forces, the judicial forces, the msm forces, and assorted government ministries (both provincial and federal) have determined to destroy Jim’s character and his ability to support his family all because of what Jim has learned about how the “system” works and because he had the courage and integrity to risk his personal freedom in order to convey his truth to other Canadians.

The state is doing its damnedest to stop Jim’s ideas from gaining any traction on the Internet and thus they have arrested him and forced him to remove his websites that contain the incriminating evidence of their own malfeasance. What remains though and what I would encourage anyone reading these words to do is go try and watch Jim’s YouTube productions that still remain in cyberspace and are the essence of what his life’s work has taught him. If you Google “Jim Townsend – videos” you will still be able to find numerous short 10 minute presentations that cover a number of core topics dealing with how our country has been shaped and manipulated into the conditions that presently prevail. I will be posting the titles and urls to a number of them below.

I have been associated both with Jim’s his work and his valiant efforts to support his family for over a dozen years now. His situation, not that unlike my own, is symbolic to other Canadians who are also struggling to shed light on our collective plight as a nation and who find themselves up against a common, conditioned wall of prejudice and idiosyncratic ignorance coupled with a form of self-imposed bigotry that is as daunting as it is delusional.

As the line from another of Phil Ochs’ famous songs goes; one that applies to not only Jim Townsend but to all who strive for freedom and justice, “there but for fortune, go you or I.”

Back in November of 2011 I posted on my website the following message and plea for Jim. If you haven’t signed that petition request yet please try to do so.

Jim’s case is urgent. He was supposed to go to court for a trial and instead they just grabbed him and put him in jail. His health has been compromised due to an unfortunate tractor accident that crushed his body a few years ago. His condition has forced upon him and his family a scenario where finding the wherewithal to survive financially has been an ongoing challenge. As such I would ask you, dear reader, to look into your heart and try to imagine yourself in Jim’s situation and from there extrapolate to whether or not you might be able to help him and his family out. If you are able to please consider sending some much needed funds to Jim’s wife using the only means available to them which is a PayPal account.

Alexis Elixirs at jim@jim-townsend.com

Jim’s courage, tenacity, advocacy and imaginative, creative spirit throughout this period is a living testament to the fact that all he has done now exposes the corruption of the police state we’re all living in.

I will be posting more information on my website regarding Jim’s situation. PLEASE TRY TO FORWARD THIS MESSAGE TO OTHERS. Also, I have the Poster “FREE JIM TOWNSEND” in a higher resolution for anyone who might wish to print copies for distribution. Please contact me via email and I will send you a larger copy.

Anyone wishing further information on Jim or to contact Jim via his wife Judith is asked to write to: Judith Townsend judithtownsend@hotmail.com

As far as I know these two urls are still operating. Please advise if you find they are not working.

http://vimeo.com/21369024

http://youtube.com/townsendjim

——–

OIL AND GAS MONOPOLY

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8J6PsIaQFHw&feature=related

——-

REAL MONEY SILVER AND GOLD

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vNNv-kY2Pug

——-

LEGAL CONTRACTS AND VOTING FRAUD

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e_25vZgsSVw&feature=related

——-

ENERGIZE YOUR BODY AND MIND

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WFomF29EVzw&feature=related

——-

SAME OLD NEW WORLD ORDER

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tJNpRgnEzUw&feature=related

——-

PLACER GOLD CLAIMS BY JIM TOWNSEND

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lGlshz4hv-Q

——–

CANADA UNDER ATTACK – MY RESPONSE TO CRA REQUEST FOR VIDEOS

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sD2o-JoXdR0&feature=related

——-

TAX PAYERS VERSUS TAX RECEIVERS

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TC4BByM_oJ4&feature=related

——-

LEGAL DEFINITIONS

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y2mJUDAURcY&feature=related

——-

GOD BUSTED FOR GROWING POT (PART 1)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nWR7skFjsTw&feature=related

——–

GOD BUSTED FOR GROWING POT (PART 2)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&v=NWoiNpjGqfw&NR=1

——–

HATE LITERATURE

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xkMeV_Lh-E0&feature=related

——-

On behalf of Jim and his family and his supporter,

Shine your Light for Love, Peace & Justice for All,

Arthur Topham
Publisher/Editor
The Radical Press
Canada’s Radical News Network
“Digging to the root of the issues since 1998″
http://www.radicalpress.com
radical@radicalpress.com

Section 13 of human rights act one step closer to being repealed

http://www.catholicregister.org/news/canada/item/13889-section-13-of-human-rights-act-one-step-closer-to-being-repealed

Section 13 of human rights act one step closer to being repealed

Written by Deborah Gyapong, Canadian Catholic News
Thursday, 16 February 2012

BrianStorseth

Conservative MP Brian Storseth’s Bill C-304, which would repeal the so-called hate speech provision act, passed second reading by a 158-131 vote Feb. 15. – Photo by Deborah Gyapong

OTTAWA - A private member’s bill that would axe the controversial Section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act has passed second reading and will now go to committee for further study.

Conservative MP Brian Storseth’s Bill C-304, which would repeal the so-called hate speech provision act, passed second reading by a 158-131 vote Feb. 15.

A lone Liberal, Scott Simms, voted with the Conservatives, who overwhelmingly supported the bill. Otherwise, the NDP and Liberals opposed the bill.

“I was excited that there was one courageous enough to stand up for his constituents and his own personal views,” said Storseth, who said he hopes for more support from Opposition MPs.

Bill C-304 now moves to the justice committee where Storseth hopes it can be fast-tracked for study. If he is successful in getting a priority placed on the bill, it could come up for a final vote in the House this spring, and then go on to the Senate.

Under Section 13, which deems any communication “likely to expose” an identified group to hatred or contempt liable for prosecution under the rights act, the truth is no defense. Neither is intent, as the act considers only the possible discriminatory effect of the communication on the groups listed in the legislation. Thus those who might write factual or honest opinion can run afoul of Section 13 as Maclean’s magazine did for running articles by best-selling author Mark Steyn on radical Islam. Christians who criticize homosexuality on the basis of religious belief can also find themselves facing complaints, as did Catholic Insight and Calgary Bishop Fred Henry over the same-sex marriage issue.

The Catholic Civil Rights League applauded the second reading vote. In a Feb. 16 news release, the League said Section 13 “has been used to penalize the peaceable expression of opinion based on religious belief.” It cited the complaints brought against Catholic Insight that were later dropped, but not until the magazine had spent more than $30,000 defending itself.

“The hate speech provisions in the Criminal Code provide limits on expression that are sufficient in a democracy,” said League executive director Joanne McGarry. “A situation where accusers are free to file complaints that may even lack a serious basis, and then leave the accused to pay his or her own potentially high costs in response, is unacceptable.

“Freedom of expression and freedom of religion are both Charter rights, and any limitation on them belongs in Parliament and the courts, not administrative tribunals,” she said.

Storseth said he was grateful to have such widespread support from religious and other groups from all ends of the political spectrum for his bill.

“The key is to stay focused,” he said. “This is one step. We now have to get this through the justice committee as quickly as possible and get this bill forward in the interest of all Canadians.

“This is an archaic piece of legislation. It’s really hurt freedom of expression in our country.”

Even opponents of Storseth’s bill agreed that Section 13 needs to be reviewed.

“I am not suggesting that Section 13 is perfect,” said NDP MP Mylène Freeman. “Indeed, that section is problematic. The main point I would like to make here today is that the principle behind maintaining Section 13 deserves the support of all members.”

NDP MP Joe Comartin also argued for keeping a way of targeting hate speech without the high threshold necessary for criminal charges.

“We need two tiers in order to have a free society for individuals who are regularly targeted by anti-Semitic or anti-Islamic people,” he said. “We can include homophobia as well.”

Storseth rejected a two-tier approach to dealing with freedom of expression, calling open debates an “imperative to having a healthy and free Western democratic society.”

————

Vancouver’s Communist ‘People’s Voice’ Attacks Radical Press

PVHEADER
PVEDITORIAL

PEOPLE’S VOICE FEBRUARY 1-14, 2012 (pdf)

Vancouver’s Communist ‘People’s Voice’ Attacks Radical Press

by Arthur Topham

February 9th, 2012

RADLOGOLATEST

Greetings Kimball,

Long time since your name has come up on my screen. Good to know that you’re still at the helm piloting that old antiquated boat “Communism” into the as yet uncharted waters of 2012.

When I read your little critique of my RadicalPress.com site my initial reaction, prior to checking you site, was that it had been penned by none other than the master deceiver himself Will Offley and you were quoting that other Zionist rag, Canadian Dimensia magazine. You will recall that it too attempted to slur and slander the Radical Press back in 2001. But, lo and behold, it turned out to be you comrade Kimball (or so it would appear).

I must say though that if you are still suffering under the misconception that I and my site are pretending to be “progressive” then you truly need to give your head a shake. Every self-respecting journalist and truth-seeker, at this stage of the game Kimball, knows full well that anything even remotely related to that term, is connected to the commies and by clear association the  Zionist Ashkenazim Jews. You know, the ones who orchestrated the downfall of the Russian monarchy and then slaughtered 66 million Christians and other non-commie-zionist human beings.

One thing that I did find a bit astounding when I revisit your site Kimball is this evident delusion that somehow you commies are leading the “resistance” against the Zionist juggernaut (you can call it Communism or Talmudic Jew or whatever name you prefer). It’s as if you’re caught still in some bygone, anachronistic time warp and clinging to an outworn dogma that died along with Commissar Stalin and his Jewish overlords.

Now I also find it just a bit hypocritical on your part calling my publishing company Radical Press “badly misnamed.” Why do you do that Kimball? Do you feel that the commies have a special right to use the word “radical” and no one else is allowed to? Do remember please that its root meaning comes from the Latin “radix” which means, as my longstanding RP signature attests, “digging to the root of the issue.”

That is what I have been doing since June of 1998 Kimball, digging up all the weeds that I can find growing in God’s green pastures and exposing their nefarious, noxious roots to the bright and beautiful sunlight of truth so that those planted by the synagogue of Satan (aka the Rothschild Talmudic Zionist Jew criminal cartel that owns and operates an assorted medley of “Marxist” “Communist” publications and other slithering, serpentine seditious scams) will whither and die and this wonderful and marvelous creation that God has provided for us will continue to wax in wonder and joy and not be dragged down into that collective hell on earth called Communism (or, Zionism as it rightly is).

I must say though that I do love that one line:

“One example in Canada is the badly misnamed “Radical Press” website, which presents a mix of left analyses with a deadly dose of hate propaganda. Under the rubric of “defending free speech,” this site posts the viciously anti-Semitic forgery Protocols of the Elders of Zion, the fascist rantings of Eustance [sic] Mullins, and similar gutter trash. Not surprisingly, the Radical Press gives coverage to the hate campaigns led by Kari Simpson and “Culture Guard”.”

Kari250
RoadkillRadio
I note in your editorial that you are now calling Kari Simpson of RoadKill Radio a “hatemonger” as well and attempting to pull the old “guilt by association” card out of your sleeve. It’s soooo old hat Kimball. I’m always surprised by the incredible lack of imagination that you Zionist-Communist Jews display when it comes to attacking your perceived enemies.

“Hate” is a big thing with you Jews eh Kimball? It’s like pablum for hungry babies or gruel for the famished. Sorta like what the 7 to 14 million Ukrainians that your commie hero Stalin slaughtered and starved to death during the early 1930s would likely have relished had the Bolsheviks not used every diabolical means to insure that they couldn’t access their own food crops.

It’s truly amazing though to find just how versatile that term “hate” really is. Anyone who exposes evil and moral infamy and wrongdoing is automatically called a “hatemonger.” Anyone who tries to show that subjecting little children to blatant brainwashing by blasphemous bumfuckers within the present Zionist-controlled cultural/educational milieu here in Canada must, to any rational, secular-minded, atheistic sycophant of the Zionist-Communist agenda, automatically be a “hatemonger.” How clever indeed Kimball!

Your mental reasoning is akin to calling a person who is health conscious and environmentally aware and who protests over the use of GMO foods and adulterants in their food supply a “hatemonger”  due to the simple fact that those pushing these damned products are the same folks who are bankrolling your rag and if someone complains then they too are tarred with the same “hate” brush. Yes indeed Kimball, you and your ilk definitely have an elastic term here that you can quickly draw, like one of your condoms, over the head of any decent, respectable, law-abiding soul who might try and resist your overall agenda of dragging humanity down to the lowest and vilest depths of depravity possible in order to kill the spirit of the individual and turn us all into mindless, sexless, heartless wage-slaves of the Zionist Jew cartel whose storm winds are now blowing your battered little ship of Marxist-Leninist fools toward the rocky reefs of “world revolution” as foretold by your Trotskyite forebears.

It appears, in your mind at least, Kimball, that Ron Paul also ought to be considered an opponent of the Zionist-Communist agenda for a one world totalitarian slave state because he too appears to suffer from “homophobia” and doesn’t want the bumfuckers and commies controlling and running the world. If that be so I must say that I am honored to be included in with the likes of Mr. Paul and his countless supporters.

Your final pithy closing comment again employs that expansive word “hatred.” Neat eh how a simple word like that can nullify any further need to explain your own devious plans for the world and just dismiss with your slight of hand the true freedom fighters who are on to your dark and evil project for global subjugation and an endless hell on earth. True, the Zionists have displayed “patient efforts” over the past century and longer while awaiting their Protocols poison to take effect upon the unwary minds of the proles or masses but thank God that He sent His children a fiery sword to deal with those who now endanger all life itself. The internet will be your demise Kimball. You will be exposed and your sad, false troglodyte prophets driven out from the fields of the Lord back into the existential and nihilistic wastelands from whence you first slithered forth.

What'sLeft?

Kimball, your pro-Zionist one world government rag asks the following question, “What’s Left?” Well, it’s pretty clear that what’s left is all that is right and decent and ethical and morally poignant in this dear old world; one that’s been under continuous, relentless attack since your Rothschild Jewish commie destruction of the Russian monarchy in 1917. Communism, as the world is now realizing, is but another Zionist euphemism for the powerful, vested and diabolic entity that hides in the shadows and strikes out at the innocent and unsuspecting like a viper in the grass. Jesus Christ referred to your dark power as the “synagogue of Satan.” You and the likes of you are but the Devil’s spawn out to wreak endless slaughter, misery and destruction upon any and all who don’t bend over in obeisance to your deceptive and deadly demands.

Your time draweth nigh….

Take it easy Comrade Cariou and remember to…

Shine your Light for Love, Peace & Justice for All,

Arthur Topham
Publisher/Editor
The Radical Press
Canada’s Radical News Network
“Digging to the root of the issues since 1998″
http://www.radicalpress.com
radical@radicalpress.com
———–

Canadian Foreign Affairs Minister Baird: Israeli Flunky & Traitor to Canada

ZionistMagCover

Canadian Foreign Affairs Minister Baird: Israeli Flunky & Traitor to Canada

Commentary

by RadicalPress Publisher Arthur Topham

All the recent actions by Canada’s Foreign Affairs Minister Baird with respect to his overt and seditious groveling before the Israeli government has to end and end damn soon.

It’s one thing for Baird to make an ass of himself in front of the world as a private individual but for him to be behaving in the manner that he is when bearing the mantle of Canada’s Foreign Affairs Minister is nothing less than a traitorous act aimed at all Canadians who believe in a sovereign nation free of any direct connections with the world’s No. 1 terrorist rogue state.

beaniebrainbaird

Rabbi Chaim Mendelsohn, Director of Public Affairs of the Canadian Federation of Chabad Lubavitch, introduces Canada’s Foreign Affairs Minister Brownnoser Baird to a group of hard line right wing rabbis in the central synagogue in Kfar Chabad in Israel on Jan. 31, 2012.

_____________________________________________________________________

In response to the Globe & Mail’s article titled, “Baird sticks to party line – Israel’s Likud party” by its pro-Zionist rag writer Patrick Martin, a member of the Anti-Zionist Canada group had the following insightful commentary to offer to all Canadians who are fed up with Harper and his Zionist Con-serveisrael Party and their shameless, irresponsible and reprehensible behaviour when it comes to linking our nation with this global embarrassment known as “Israel”.

She writes:

It is way past time we demanded the resignation of this traitor.  I cannot believe we, as a country, are allowing the likes of this fawning fool, this shrieking idiot, to speak for us.  He certainly does not speak for me.

Where is the outrage?  Where is the grass roots (or otherwise) movement to have him removed?

I realize he is just one of many, but he is by far the most blatant.

Imagine a Canadian representative supporting terror?  Supporting ethnic cleansing?  Supporting slow-motion genocide?  Supporting non-compliance with UN resolutions and international law?  And on and on!  And doing it over and over in public?

Let’s not forget (but I wish we could!) his performance at the UN re: the vote for a Palestinian state, even to wearing the dual Canada/Israel pin in his lapel as if he were attending a sporting event.

He fits right in, as does Harper, with the likes of Gingrich, Rommey, Bolton, and the entire US Congress — stomach churning.

Letting him remain in his current post (and we all know without having to ask how he got there!) is tantamount to treason.

I’d also like to know who paid for this visit to the little terror state that can — and does!

If this disgusting excuse for a human being wants to continue with his sick support for evil, then I’d suggest he resign (or be forced out!) and he can cheer on his precious Israel on his own time and his own money.  Not as a representative of this country.  Let him become spokesperson for B’nai Brith or the Jewish Congress or better still let him move to Israel and enjoy its terrorism.

Lady A