Ontario Civil Liberties Association (OCLA) issues strong support statement and online Petition for Arthur Topham and RadicalPress.com by Arthur Topham

OCLA Hdr

RPEdNew400 copy

Dear Readers and Supporters of Freedom of Speech,

After eight years of unrelenting legal harassment (commencing in 2007) on the part of the Canadian government and the masonic Jewish lobby group B’nai Brith Canada I’m most pleased to announce that the Ontario Civil Liberties Association (OCLA) has assumed a positive leadership role in offering its support to both myself and RadicalPress.com in the current sec. 319(2) CCC “Hate Propaganda” charge which was laid against my person and RadicalPress.com back on May 16th, 2012.

I would like to publicly thank Joseph Hickey, Executive Director for the OCLA for his supportive endorsement of this very important case, one that will ultimately determine the fate of free expression on the internet in Canada and affect all other bloggers, writers, artists and publishers who would, in all likelihood, suffer the same fate as myself for expressing political commentary and viewpoints which are deemed as “hate” by the Jewish lobbyists who consistently monitor Canada’s alternative and mainstream media in search of websites and blogs that host contrary perspectives on the issues of political Zionism and the motives and actions of the state of Israel.

As well as issuing the following public statement the OCLA has also posted an on-line Petition which I, and hopefully many others, will be spreading around cyberspace in order to gather additional support for their initiative. See the Petition here: Please sign it.

Further efforts are also planned which will be posted as they unfold.

Please take the time to read this short pdf file containing the OCLA’s statement on R v Arthur Topham and feel free to comment.

The time to commence a concerted effort in order to bring this case to the attention of more Canadians is now. Please share this post as widely as humanly possible.

 

Sincerely,

 
 
Arthur Topham
Pub/Ed
RadicalPress.com
Canada’s Radical News Network
“Digging to the root of the issues since 1998”

 

CLICK ON PDF URL BELOW TO READ OCLA STATEMENT:

http://ocla.ca/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/OCLA-statement-re-Arthur-Topham.pdf

Wyatt Christie: Frontier Lawyer. In Memory of Douglas H. Christie

WyattChristieFrontierLawyer800

Doug Christie’s name and work must and will go down in true, recorded history as the paramount voice that spoke out for our fundamental right to freedom of speech.

The following graphic is one that I put together some time ago when Doug was still alive and working on my Sec. 319(2) “hate crime” case. Please share it with all who you feel loved and respected Doug’s efforts.

Arthur Topham – Editor

The Radical Press

Arthur Topham: Majority of the Canadian Media Are Controlled by Zionists. An Interview with FARS News Agency (IRAN) journalist Kourosh Ziabari

 http://english.farsnews.com/newstext.aspx?nn=13921211001430

FARS Interview

By Kourosh Ziabari

KouroshPortrait copy 2

A veteran Canadian author and editor says that Canada is home to one of the largest Israeli lobbies in the West, and there are numerous Jewish advocacy organizations that pursue the interests of the Israeli regime and have long launched a massive campaign against freedom of speech in the name of combating “anti-Semitism”.

According to Arthur Topham, the major mission of these organizations is to advocate for any and all things Jewish and anything connected with Israel and with maintaining the status quo mindset which includes ongoing propaganda and advocacy related to the Holocaust Myth, pushing the whole “anti-Semitism” and “racism” issues in order to gain political points with whatever government is in power and also a strong focus on maintaining and strengthening Canada’s “hate crime” laws which act as a major defense against the Canadians who try to expose the crimes of Israel against the Palestinian people and who criticize the Zionist ideology and all the related issues connected with Jewish financial and media and corporate power around the world.”

Arthur Topham is a 67-year-old writer, gold miner and publisher of the Radical Press (www.radicalpress.com), an alternative internet news and opinion website which has been in continuous operation in British Columbia since June 1998.

Since 2007, Topham has been accused by the Canadian government of spreading anti-Semitic sentiments and promoting hatred against “people of the Jewish religion or ethnic group.” He has been arrested and jailed once for publishing materials which were critical of the Israeli regime’s treatment of the Palestinian people. He is currently being investigated in a court and if found guilty, he could receive a two-year jail sentence and be prohibited from publishing.

“It’s important for readers to understand that all the so-called “hate crimes” which we hear constantly being spoken and written about in the Jewish-controlled mainstream media are products of the efforts of the Zionist lobby groups here in Canada and elsewhere to manufacture legal mechanisms that could be used by either “human rights” commissions and tribunals or the criminal code of the Canadian judicial system to control and censor the fundamental right to free expression or “freedom of speech”, especially as it now is being applied to the internet here in Canada,” said Topham in an exclusive interview with Fars News Agency.

Arthur Topham took part in an interview with FNA and responded to some questions regarding the growth and influence of the Israeli lobby in Canada, the state of Israeli-Canadian relations, the dominance of Jewish advocacy organizations over the mass media in Canada and Stephen Harper government’s discriminatory measures against Iran. What follows is the text of the interview.

Red spacer copy

Q: It’s said that Canada is one of the most pro-Israel countries in the Western hemisphere and that it is home to an influential Israeli lobby. It’s also noted that Canada has endeavored a great deal in 1948 to secure the recognition of the Israeli state in the United Nations. Why is the Israeli lobby so powerful and dominant in Canada? What makes Canada and Israel so robustly attached to each other?

A: Given the recent international display of abject and shameful obeisance to Israel and the Zionist agenda by the current Harper government, it’s safe to say that such extreme, overt behavior is definitely indicative of a very powerful and influential Israeli lobby here in Canada. But, that said, I’m hesitant to state that the majority of the Canadian population are as openly and unabashedly pro-Israel as the Harper government itself.

One must keep in mind that the Harper Conservative government was re-elected in 2011 by only 39.62% of those who actually voted. In other words out of a total of approximately 24 million eligible voters only 14.7 million cast their ballots and of that figure only 5.8 million voted for Harper. It was the second lowest voter turnout in Canadian history, the lowest being the 2008 election when Harper was able to win a minority government. So in reality Harper only received two percent more of the votes than in 2008 but due to the election system we have here in Canada that 2% translated into an additional 24 seats in parliament which gave the Harper Conservatives a majority win. Harper called it a “decisive endorsement” of his party’s campaign platform but that was hardly the case considering the far greater number of citizens who didn’t vote Conservative. In fact many Canadians described his win in far less flattering terms.

As for Canada’s role in the UN’s decision to recognize the state of Israel, it’s my understanding that Canada wasn’t all that interested in involving itself in the whole Zionist issue of a “homeland for the Jews” in Palestine. The Canadian Prime Minister at the time, William Lyon Mackenzie King, had done his best to not get involved in the controversy surrounding the British White Paper of 1939 but, unfortunately, he was eventually drawn into playing a greater role by the USA when Britain transferred the Palestine question to the UN in the spring of 1947. The United States, worried about the Soviets gaining too much influence in the region, pressured Canada to join a commission the US was planning to create to counter the Soviet initiatives and that led to greater involvement on the part of Canada. When it came time for Canada to support the partition plan in November of 1947 apparently Mackenzie King only grudgingly accepted it so I would have to say that in general Canada at the time of the creation of Israel wasn’t in any way as zealous about Israel as what we are seeing today with the Harper government.

To answer your question about why the Israeli lobby is so powerful and dominant in Canada I suspect that the reasons are no different than what you would find were you to ask that same question of any western nation where the Jews have settled in numbers prior to and since the turn of the 20th century. One of the primary sources for the dispensing of their disproportional power and influence has been their secretive masonic organization known as B’nai Brith, a Rothschild-funded, occult hierarchical system founded in the USA in 1843 and now having thousands upon thousands of lodges and chapters around the world. The first Canadian B’nai Brith masonic lodge was established in Toronto back in 1875 and by the beginning of the 1900s the Jews were already well established in Eastern Canada with sizeable communities in Montreal and Toronto.

Given the “power of the purse” thanks to the usurious fractional reserve banking system which they created, their influence within Canada’s legal system, academia and the media all fitted into the standard template used by the Zionists for centuries for infiltrating and influencing host nations and their governments.

In 1913 with the establishment of the Rothschild banking cartel’s US Federal Reserve and B’nai Brith’s branch organization the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) the Zionists became increasingly more politically involved in areas of government, the economy and media and by the end of WW2 their power and influence had risen beyond their wildest expectations by their political and media manipulation and management of the most controversial subject ever to have been raised in the 20th century, that being, the alleged “Holocaust of 6 million Jews” by Germany during the war of 1939 – 1945. It was the presumed extermination of the unbelievable number of Jews by Hitler’s regime that became the determining factor in the fate of Palestine and the Middle East in general and influenced the voting results in May of 1948.

As to your question regarding the robust attachment for Israel by Canada I would have to say that it’s primarily the result of the Zionist lobby’s inordinate power over the present Conservative government of Prime Minister Stephen Harper. Previous governments have not disgraced their nation to the extent that Harper has been since 2008 and hopefully any new change of government would see this despicable practice end.

Q: How many Zionist and pro-Israeli organizations are currently operating in Canada? What are their major missions and responsibilities? What are the sources of their funding and budget?

A: The principal Zionist and pro-Israeli organizations currently operating in Canada are B’nai Brith Canada, the Canadian Jewish Political Affairs Committee (CJPAC) and the Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs (CIJA), formerly the Canadian Council for Israel and Jewish Advocacy, but it needs to be mentioned that one of the most long-standing Jewish lobby organizations was the Canadian Jewish Congress which has operated here since 1919 and only ceased its efforts in 2011 when it basically merged with the newly formed Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs (CIJA).

As with all of them their major missions are to advocate for any and all things Jewish and anything connected with the state of Israel and with maintaining the status quo mindset which includes ongoing propaganda and advocacy related to the Holocaust Myth, pushing the whole “anti-Semitism” and “racism” issues in order to gain political points with whatever government is in power and also a strong focus on maintaining and strengthening Canada’s “hate crime” laws which act as a major defense against Canadians who try to expose the crimes of the state of Israel against the Palestinian people and who criticize the Zionist ideology and all the related issues connected with Jewish financial and media and corporate power around the world.

I haven’t been able to determine the sources of their funding and budgets but one can easily extrapolate that their funding either comes from government grants or from various Zionist Jew organizations that rely upon wealthy donors from within their community.

The newest umbrella organization, the Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs, is likely the most relevant lobby group in Canada in terms of our nation’s connections with the state of Israel and the policies of Harper government when it comes to affairs related to the Middle East. They are the most vocal group pushing government and the Zionist media here in Canada with respect to issues of free speech on the internet and their “hate speech” legislation which they are directly responsible for having incorporated into Canadian jurisprudence. As well they are active in fighting to destroy the boycott of Israel movement (Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions known as BDS) and, of course, the most prominent lobby group responsible for influencing the Harper government’s foreign policies with respect to Canada’s sanctions against Iran.

Q: Many critics of the Canadian foreign policy have argued that the mainstream media in the North American country are overwhelmed by the Israeli lobby and publish what the pro-Israeli advocacy groups dictate to them. May you please explain for our readers the roots and reasons of the expansion and growth of the Israeli influence and dominance over the Canadian media?

A: Well to be as honest as possible, Kourosh, it’s a joke to even speak of the “Canadian” media as though it actually exists. What that term “Canadian” implies is that our media is composed of a wide variety of publishing companies and independent newspapers and magazines and television stations which are owned and operated by an assortment of Canadians who are not directly affiliated with either the Zionist political agenda or the Jewish lobby organizations or the foreign state of Israel. But that, unfortunately, is not the case and hasn’t been the case for well over half a century or longer.

All estimates that I am aware of place the ownership and or control (direct or indirect) of “Canadian” media by Jewish interests at somewhere around 95% and possibly more. And so it’s not simply that the Jewish lobby groups here in Canada overwhelm the “Canadian” mainstream media and dictate to it because of their influence but more the case of actual and willing collusion between the two entities in question. There’s no doubt in my mind or in the minds of most Canadians who understand the dynamics of Jewish power and influence that Canada’s so-called “independent” media is little more than an illusion manufactured by the Zionist-controlled media itself, and this also includes the supposed flagship of national, partisan, real Canadian media, the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC). It too is heavily burdened down with pro-Zionist Jewish staff at practically all levels from the executives who set policies to the news broadcasting staff and film editors and writers and inevitably functions as the mouthpiece of pro-Zionist, pro-Israeli propaganda supporting the Harper government and its disastrous and humiliating policies toward all things relating to Arab/Muslim relations. This of course is not any different than all the other western nations including the USA, Great Britain, France, Germany, etc. The BBC in England performs the very same functions on behalf of Israel and the Jewish lobbyists there and in some ways is even more blatant in its avowed pro-Zionist propaganda.

Q: As you earlier mentioned,  it seems that certain Western states, including Canada, have inextricably tied their national interests to the interests of Israel and interpret any minor criticism of Israel as a hate crime. Several prominent academicians and authors have been imprisoned in Europe and Canada for criticizing Israel in the recent years. I also read that certain charges were leveled at you over the critical remarks you made against Israel on the Radical Press website. Would you please tell us what you think about this hate crime which is seemingly seen by the Western officials as exclusive to Israel? Is it fair and logical to ban criticism of Israel simply because it sounds ant-Semitic?

A: It’s important for readers to understand that all the so-called “hate crimes” which we hear constantly being spoken and written about in the Jewish-controlled mainstream media are products of the efforts of the Zionist lobby groups here in Canada and elsewhere to manufacture legal mechanisms that could be used by either “human rights” commissions and tribunals or the criminal code of the Canadian judicial system to control and censor the fundamental right to free expression or “freedom of speech”, especially as it now is being applied to the internet here in Canada.

Laws specific to these so-called “hate crimes” or more aptly “thought crimes” when viewed from an Orwellian perspective, didn’t surface until after WW2 and were connected first with the UN’s Universal Declaration of Human Rights in 1948, which themselves were in large measure based upon or directly related to what the American writer Arthur R. Butz called the “hoax of the Twentieth century” which of course was in reference to the Zionist Jew’s claim that six million European Jews were exterminated by the German military forces during WW2. In other words the Holocaust legend (Lie) was what the Zionists used in order to justify all their subsequent demands for “hate crime” legislation here in Canada and elsewhere around the world.

By as early as March, 1953 the Canadian Jewish Congress was already appearing before a Special House of Commons Committee that was reviewing and studying a Criminal Code amendment bill and lobbying to have Parliament introduce special criminal offences related to “hate propaganda.” By January 1965 Canada’s federal Minister of Justice Guy Favreau had named a Special Committee under the Chairmanship of Dean Maxwell Cohen (Jewish) to report to him on “hate propaganda” and then after another five years of intense lobbying, in June of 1970 Parliament adopted and Royal Assent was given to amendments to the Criminal Code, based largely on Cohen Committee recommendations, designed to deal with the advocacy of genocide and “hate propaganda.”

Throughout the 1970s and 80s additional efforts continued to expand upon the “hate crime” concept within Canadian jurisprudence and in 1984 the famous, landmark case of James Keegsra began. This is one that my former lawyer Mr. Douglas Christie first became involved with; a case that catapulted Mr. Christie on to the world stage as Canada’s foremost fighter against these Zionist created censorship laws based on the thought crime revolving around the emotional state of mind called “hate.”

In December of 1990 the Supreme Court of Canada in the Keegstra case upheld s.319(2) of the Criminal Code as a “reasonable limit on Charter-guaranteed freedom of expression” and on the same day in another “hate crime” related case Taylor the Court upheld s. 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act on the same grounds. Both decisions laid the groundwork for all the subsequent “hate crime” cases that occurred through the last 15 years and we can easily see that in every case it has been the Jewish lobby organizations here in Canada who are either responsible for having laid the charges against people or are inevitably the primary interveners in the cases.

It’s also worthy of note that in June of 1998, the very month that I began publishing my monthly tabloid The Radical, B’nai Brith Canada, at its annual general meeting in Ottawa, unanimously adopted a resolution urging that “Holocaust denial” be made a criminal offence. The rest, as they say is history but to put it all into a broader perspective any analysis of the origins and development of “hate crime” legislation in Canada easily shows that without the constant push and shove of the Zionist lobbyists and the ongoing, relentless daily propaganda by the Zionist-controlled media indoctrinating the population with the “Holocaust Myth” these so-called “crimes” would likely never have entered into our statutes.

Of course in reply to your question “Is it fair and logical to ban criticism of Israel simply because it sounds anti-Semitic?” the answer is obviously a resounding no! It’s illogical and unjust to use such spurious, vexatious undemocratic laws to stifle debate on issues of such vital importance to a nation’s domestic and foreign policies.

Q: I read that you were charged with a hate crime because of your anti-Israeli writings on the Radical Press website. I would like to know how the local authorities treated you after they leveled those accusations against you. Were you eventually jailed for the alleged violations?

A: Unlike many Canadians who’ve been charged with these “hate crimes” I was not only charged with a Sec. 319(2) Criminal Code offence in May of 2012 but even prior to then I had been charged with a Sec. 13(1) “hate crime” offence by the Canadian Human Rights Commission back in November of 2007. So my ongoing battle to retain my right to free expression and publish on RadicalPress.com is now in its 7th year of continuous litigation on two fronts.

It’s also of interest to note that in both cases it was the Jewish lobby organization B’nai Brith Canada who was responsible for laying the complaints against me. The first Sec. 13(1) charge was the least invasive of the two and it only resulted in my receiving written documents accusing me of the crime and then email and telephone exchanges between the Canadian Human Rights Commission (CHRC) and the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal (CHRT) which took over once the CHRC determined that the case should move ahead to the tribunal stage of persecution. That case was stayed back in 2009 pending the outcome of another case that preceded my own and which only this January ruled that it could continue even though the Canadian Parliament repealed the infamous Sec. 13(1) legislation in the Canadian Human Rights Act back in June of 2012.

The more recent Sec. 319(2) Criminal Code charge was a different matter. After the agents of Zionism laid their complaint with the British Columbia “Hate Crime Team” a long investigation took place which eventually culminated in police helicopters surveilling my home, RCMP officers stalking both my wife and myself and spying on us and finally the BC Hate Crime Team traveling up from Vancouver approximately 600 km and then arresting me on May 16, 2012 while I was on my way to work. I was handcuffed and taken to jail and my dear wife left with our vehicle on the side of the highway. While in jail the police obtained an illegal search warrant and entered my home and stole all of my computers, electronic files and firearms and when I was eventually released that same evening I was no longer permitted to access the internet or post on any of my websites including ones related to my other business which was connected to with the mining industry. Fortunately Mr. Douglas Christie had been working with me on the first Sec. 13(1) charge and I was able to contact him and retain his services in order to get released from jail rather quickly.

In all fairness I must add that throughout the period of my arrest and incarceration I was not in any way brutalized or abused by the police. In that sense I suppose I was very fortunate indeed.

Q: There’s a growing trend in the West for equating the criticism of Israel with anti-Semitism and opposition to Jewry. As a result, the critics of the actions and policies of Israel, including its systematic killing of the Palestinian people and its illegal settlement constructions are easily vilified and defamed as anti-Semite. Is the criticism of Israel really equal to anti-Semitism?

A: When one digs down to the actual root of the whole issue of “anti-Semitism” it becomes very obvious just how the Zionist Jews have been employing this erroneous term, as they do the “Holocaust Myth”, to justify all of their “hate crime” laws throughout most of the West including European nations. Here in Canada and the USA the vast majority of so-called Jews are acknowledged to be descended from the Ashkenazim or Eastern European Jews who, according to most researchers and investigators, have very little to no direct connection to the Semitic people of the Middle East and are not Semites themselves so it’s ludicrous and illogical and absolutely deceptive on their part to continually be playing this “anti-Semitic” card in their gamble to take over the world. If I and others in Canada were being severely critical of the Palestinian people or other Arabic nations then there might be just cause to call us “anti-Semitic” but in the case of the Zionist Jews it is nothing but more subterfuge and deceit designed to mask their geopolitical motives and their blatant and racist treatment of the Palestinian people.

Q: Canada regularly blasts Iran for its alleged violations of human rights. In September 2012, it unilaterally closed its embassy in Iran and also expelled the Iranian diplomats from Ottawa. Some critics and experts believe that Israel is behind these anti-Iran moves by the Canadian government. What’s your viewpoint on that? Why has Canada adopted such a hostile attitude toward Iran while the new Iranian administration has taken a conciliatory approach toward the West and is moving toward normalizing its ties with the international community?

A: Those critics and experts who say that Israel is behind the Harper government’s vehement and irrational attacks upon Iran are absolutely correct in their assessment of the real reasons for this abominable and hateful behavior on the part of the Harper government toward Iran. There is no other plausible explanation for Canada’s anti-Iran behavior given the degree of power and influence that the Jewish lobbyists wield over Harper and his traitorous band of sycophantic Ministers. When one adds to this negative attitude the tremendous pressure that the US government places on Canada to keep in line with AIPAC’s program of vilification of Iran, it’s easy to see why the mix of these two neo-con, Zionist-controlled governments would be synchronized to spread disinformation and outright hatred toward one of last remaining nations on the face of the planet not under the control of the Rothschild Banking cartel.

Q: Treating Israel with a sort of awe and fear and veneration has become a religion and a tradition in such countries as Canada. Those who behave or opine otherwise will be ostracized and accused. How is it possible to change the atmosphere and create an environment in which everybody can freely express his viewpoints regarding Israel without being fearful of prosecution or defamation?

A: It is in large measure the result of decades upon decades of ongoing propaganda concerning the “Holocaust Myth” and the “evil Nazis” and “anti-Semitism” and all of Hollywood’s and the Jewish media’s deception coupled with very successful attempts at brainwashing many of the Christian sects in both Canada and the USA and turning them into Christian Zionists that has led to this unnatural and indecent and false “respect and veneration” of Israel and its Zionist ideology.

From my personal experiences and perspective on the matter of Israel I believe that the only peaceful and logical solution to altering the present state of affairs in Canada is to continue to make available to the general public as much alternative information on the realities of what Zionism truly is and what the crimes of Israel are and also to continue to expose the underbelly of the Jewish lobbyist groups here in Canada and point out to Canadians just how these foreign, pro-Israel organizations like B’nai Brith and the Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs are committing treasonous acts against the nation by using their wealth and power and influence to subvert the policies of the federal government and turn the country into another clone of Israel.

I also firmly believe that Canadians who are opposed to the Zionist lobbyist and to the actions of the Harper government should work more closely with those in the Arab community in order to facilitate greater understanding of this problem and help other Canadians to realize that their support for Harper is counter-productive to a harmonious and lasting relationship with the Middle East. The degree of control of Canada’s mainstream media is one of the greatest stumbling blocks standing in the way of peace between the east and the west. Anything therefore that the east can do to help those of us here in west to get the message out regarding the Zionists and their lobby groups can only have a beneficial effect for both of us in the long run.

Interview by Kourosh Ziabari

——

Eighty Years of Infamy by Arthur Topham

Screen Shot 2013-05-22 at 5.31.19 PM

This dynamic volume [Germany Must Perish!] outlines a comprehensive plan for the extinction of the German nation and the total eradication from the earth, of all her people.”

“It is a definite obligation which the world owes to those who struggled and died against the German yesterday, and to those who are fighting him again today, as it is the bounden duty of the present generation to those yet unborn, to make certain that the vicious fangs of the German serpent shall never strike again. And since the venom of those fangs derives its fatal poison not from within the body, but from the war-soul of the German, nothing else would assure humanity safety and security but that that war-soul be forever expunged, and the diseased carcass which harbors it forever removed from this world. There is no longer any alternative: Germany Must Perish!”
~ Theodore N. Kaufman, Germany Must Perish!, Argyle Press, Newark, New Jersey, 1941

On Thursday, March 23rd, 1933 the newly democratically elected Chancellor of Germany Adolf Hitler and his cabinet, in a vote taken in the Kroll Opera House in Berlin by the Reichstag on proposed legislation known as the Enabling Act – the “Law for Removing the Distress of People and Reich,” were given a four year mandate to rule Germany, unrestrained by Parliament. The vote, when taken, was: 441 for and 84 against.

On Friday, March 24th, 1933 one day after this historic event, world Jewry openly declared war on Germany.

JudeaDeclaresWarGermany 700

Thus was set the stage upon which Germany and the world at large would be continually forced to bear witness to world Jewry’s endless and psychopathic vengeful obsession with their ongoing campaign of vitriolic lies, racism and HATRED toward the German people and the German nation.

2013 marks the 80th anniversary of this planned strategy of intentional conditioning of generation upon generation of western civilization’s citizens to fear, loathe and despise first and foremost the National Socialist Party of Germany (termed “NAZI” by the Jew media), its leader Adolf Hitler and then, by extrapolation, the German people as a whole.

After eight decades of defamation and endless slurring it begs the question as to why world Jewry would continue to, as the saying goes, flog a dead horse over and over and over again? To what (or whose) advantage is is to constantly harken back nearly a century in order to reinforce what is now, thanks to the tireless efforts of historical revisionists, evidently the most profoundly provocative and colossal LIE ever foisted upon the world?

A day never passes when the so-called “mainstream media (msm)” doesn’t make mention of either Adolf Hitler or the Nazi’s or the purported “Jewish Holocaust”. Relentless and hard-hearted as the tax man or the bill collector the Jew-controlled msm, like the ancient Mariner in Coleridge’s famed poem, holds the general pubic’s attention hostage with its “glittering (tv) eye” while spinning out its slanderous tales of endless misery and woe and persecution, all of which is maliciously and willfully designed to shore up a deceit that is now unravelling before the world thanks to the miracle of the Internet.

Only those born before 1933 could honestly say that they lived in a period of history when libel of Germany wasn’t an all-pervasive reality and the numbers of people living today who are of that age and still conscious of their former world are few and far between.

Those of us born after world Jewry’s 1933 declaration have all been subjected to the unceasing assault on the German nation that still persists today.

It was writers like Theodore N. Kaufmann, quoted above, who spear-headed the intentional promotion of HATRED toward Germany prior to America’s involvement in a war that Hitler and the German nation never wanted and never were guilty of causing. Kaufmann and world Jewry’s aim was to change the attitude of the American people; one that was then either neutral or pro-German rather than anti and twist the truth about Hitler and the National Socialist government and their amazing accomplishments from 1933 until 1939. And so his hate-filled screed titled German Must Perish! was promoted by the most prestigious msm publications in the USA when it appeared in 1941 prior to America’s entry into the conflict. Magazines like Time and newspapers like the New York Times and the Washington Post lauded the idea of absolutely destroying the German nation and the German race as a whole referring to the grotesquely contemptible concept as a “SENSATIONAL IDEA!”

GermanyPerishF&BCovers copy 3

Once world Jewry was successful in dragging the USA into the war via their choreographed “Pearl Harbour” maneuver all stops were pulled out and the vicious denigration of Hitler and Germany began in earnest never to abate even to this day.

Canadian children growing up during the war years were subjected to all the anti-German hatred propaganda that was carried in the media. Images of Hitler and the “Nazis” were ever-present and for all the German Canadian citizens throughout the nation the devastating effect of such vile and systematic psychic abuse worked its way into the minds and subconscious of those who, prior to world Jewry’s intensions, had been respected members of Canadian society.

HitlerSnowball 2

HitlerDartboard

When the war finally culminated in a victory for Soviet Communism, world Jewry and so-called western “democracy” in 1945 one would think that soon thereafter the hatred and vilification of the German people would have slowly wound down but that was not to be the case.

In February of 1945 the Allied powers met to sign the Protocol of the Yalta Conference.It was then that U.S. president Franklin D. Roosevelt first articulated the policy of “Unconditional Surrender”, a demand that the Axis powers yield to the Allies without concessions or negotiations. It was Douglas Reed in his 1956 book The Controversy of Zion, who stated in  Chapter 42 of his book aptly titled ‘The Talmudic Vengeance’, that it was an act of “blind vengeance” which meant that “the enemy would not be granted peace at any price whatever, and this was the absolute reversal of all “principles” previously proclaimed by the Western leaders….

“Thus at Casablanca in 1943 the decision to wreak vengeance was first taken. This was the background to the “Morgenthau Plan” of September 1944 (obviously first devised in Moscow, then drafted by Mr. Harry Dexter White for his superior, then forwarded by Mr. Morgenthau to Mr. Roosevelt, who with Mr. Churchill initialed it), the spirit of which pervaded the Yalta Conference and its Protocol. Mr. Roosevelt’s later expression of astonishment (“he had no idea how he could have initialed this”) and Mr. Churchill’s words of regret (“I had not time to examine the Morgenthau Plan in detail … I am sorry I put my initials to it”) are both voided by the fact that both then signed the Yalta document, its child and the charter of vengeance.”

Screen Shot 2013-05-22 at 2.35.32 PM

No sooner had the Yalta Protocol been signed than the propaganda machines in Canada started churning out their deceptive misinformation regarding what this Protoc0l truly meant for the German nation.

After world Jewry achieved their “unconditional surrender” of Germany (thanks to Roosevelt and Churchill), and the Bolshevik Communists were victorious in gaining full hegemony over all of eastern Europe including Poland and half of Germany then came the next phase of hate animosity toward the German people as the Jews, aided and abetted by their Marxist/Communist compatriots, began to reveal their quintessential ‘ace-up-the-sleeve’ scheme of  blaming Hitler and the National Socialists and Germany itself with having “holocausted” 6 million Jews during the three year period when anti-German collaborators had been placed in work camps throughout eastern Europe.

crucifixion-

It was an old ruse that had been attempted numerous time before throughout the early part of the 20 century but now that world Jewry was able to conspire with Stalin and their Communist counterpart and fabricate false and incriminating “evidence” of such a deed the picture changed dramatically. Using the moral abomination called the Nuremberg Trials, a pseudo-legal process not unlike that of the Canadian Human Rights Commission and its attendant Tribunal, where truth is no defence, the victors, via torture, terror and trauma, were able to force “confessions” out of former German military leaders that was then cultivated into fields of propaganda which yielded an endless supply of an adulterated diet of falsehoods for generations to come.

Nuremberg1

Reed also tells us that by 1945 world Jewry’s U.S. propaganda “hate” wing, the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai Brith was already carrying out “a high-powered educational program, geared to reach every man, woman and child” in America through the press, radio, advertising, children’s comic books and school books, lectures, films, “churches” and trade unions. This program included “219 broadcasts a day”, full-page advertisements in 397 newspapers, poster advertising in 130 cities, and “persuasions” subtly incorporated in the printed matter on blotters, matchbox covers, and envelopes. The entire national press (“1900 dailies with a 43,000,000 circulation”) and the provincial, Negro, foreign-language and labour newspapers were kept supplied with, “and used”, its material in the form of “news, background material, cartoons and comic strips”. In addition, the A.D.L. in 1945 distributed “more than 330,000 copies of important books carrying our message to libraries and other institutions”, furnished authors with “material and complete ideas”, and circulated nine million pamphlets “all tailored to fit the audiences to which they are directed”. It found “comic books” to be a particularly effective way of reaching the minds of young people, soldiers, sailors and airmen, and circulated “millions of copies” of propaganda in this form. Its organization consisted of the national headquarters, public relations committees in 150 cities, eleven regional offices, and “2,000 key men in 1,000 cities”.

Constantly beating and pushing their hate-filled anti-Semitic drums, world Jewry’s unremitting mind control operations have carried on right up to the present with book after book and magazine article after magazine article and newspaper clipping after newspaper clipping eulogizing the “6 Million” and lying through their teeth about mythical “Nazi” atrocities in Germany’s “death camps”.

Pulp fiction propaganda such as that depicted in the graphics below are typical of the Jewish publishing houses and reflect their psychotic obsession with publishing HATRED toward the German people.

Screen Shot 2013-05-22 at 3.43.23 PM

EichmannPropaganda copy

HolocautBook copy

Recently I was in a book shop perusing the shelves when I spotted the following title “Hitler’s Daughter.” I couldn’t believe my eyes. Upon looking at the book I realized that it had been published by Scholastic Books the famed publisher of children’s literature.

When the Jew say there’s “no business like Shoah [holocaust. Ed.] business,” the lesson truly sinks home when one considers the depth of depravity that they will sink to in order to brainwash future generations into believing their insane paradigm of opprobrium against the German people.

Hitler'sDaughter copy

The Final Solution

The triumph of world Jewry over the past eighty years is something to behold. Since 1933 they have worked overtime in an all out effort to flush Germany down the shit hole of history. In the process millions of otherwise sincere and honest individuals have been slowly and steadily insidiously conditioned into believing lies of such a magnitude that only now, after ten decades of deception are they finally beginning to lose their grip over the minds of the masses as the Internet and dedicated historical revisionists continue to make headway in their dismantling of the myths of the 20th century that have perpetuated a degree of HATRED never before witnessed on such a global scale.

Any such force willing and capable of deceiving the world on such a gargantuan scale is obviously not unaware of what has been taking place since the advent of the net, email and social media sites such as Facebook where these topics are slowly permeating and drawing more and more attention. The sense of desperation and panic on the part of world Jewry is palpable. If a person has been studying these events over the past quarter century or longer they can taste it in the rarefied air of cyberspace with each passing day. The pillars are beginning to shake and the deceivers are in a mode of defence that they’ve never had to contend with for a very long time. What to do? How do we stop the sheeple from becoming informed of our Great Deception and becoming aware and concerned people?

Those who have been controlling the historic dialogue since 1933 have always displayed one trait – the fervent need to CONTROL the non-Jewish gentiles (or goyim/cattle as they are wont to refer to the rest of the world’s population). Laws must be enacted to prevent the Truth from getting out and the overall population eventually realizing to what degree they have been lied to all their lives. Laws? What sort of laws could possibly prevent the people from debriefing themselves at this advanced stage of the game? Why HATE LAWS! Laws that will penalize and imprison those who are exposing our planned program of global deception. Laws that will make Truth an invalid, useless reason to speak out against the infamy. Laws that will make any factual evidence irrelevant. Laws that will make it a crime just to DENY that world Jewry’s interpretation of history might possibly be skewed and biased in favour of their own New World Order agenda for global dominance. Laws that will prevent the population from coming to the only plausible and reasonable conclusion that makes common sense, that being, the creators of the HATE LAWS are the very same folks who have been spreading universal HATRED toward the German people for the past eighty years. In other words Hate Laws for the haters and prison and fines and censorship for the Truth seekers of the world who are now on to their scam. Oi veh! what can you say?

Screen Shot 2013-05-22 at 5.22.38 PM

Well, given my own predicament and the fact that I have been under extreme attack by world Jewry myself for over six years now, I have pondered this question again and again and finally a solution that appears to be almost self-evident now that it came to my mind has arisen.

When the Jewish lobby groups here in Canada who have been instigating and pushing their “HATE LAWS” realized some years ago that sec. 13(1) of the Canadian Human Rights Act was actually a double-edged sword and some Muslim groups had the unmitigated audacity to turn these same laws upon the Jews they quickly began an all out effort to have sec. 13 of the Act removed from the statutes*. What that exercise illustrated was that any such “HATE” law, be it in the domain of the Human Rights Commissions or the Criminal Code of Canada is amenable to all Canadians, not just the Jewish lobbies. Thus the obvious answer to the goyim’s woes.

It’s time for Canadians of Germanic descent to stand up and take the bull by the horns and stop simply accepting their fate as victims of world Jewry’s program of hatred and instead become pro-active and utilize these same laws in their own defence. It’s time to stop retreating and time to go on the offensive. Time to reach out and grasp the sword of Truth, pick it up and begin to wield it, challenging the haters by applying the same hate crime laws to the actual perpetrators.

Let us fill our courtrooms around the nation with Section 319(2) “HATE CRIME” complaints against every Jewish person and Jewish media conglomerate and Jewish publishing house that has been spewing forth their vitriolic hatred against the German people for the past eighty years. Let us see how they like it when THEIR freedoms and their “rights” to defame and slander the German people are suddenly challenged from every quarter. Let us see how our federal government likes it when they have to investigate and act upon each and every legitimate grievance that the German people of Canada have to offer them in the way of injustice, prejudice and discrimination to their ethnic community. And let us see how the Jewish-controlled msm reacts to this unprecedented move by ethnic German Canadians who finally say to the government and to the world ENOUGH!

Prologue

I am certain that somewhere beyond this third rock from the Sun there must be a place of peace and truth where honesty and love prevail and children grow up free of mental conditioning so they can spend their productive adult lives doing positive and life-enhancing things that make them happy and joyful and fill their hearts with laughter. In such a place I imagine is where Adolf Hitler now resides watching over his people awaiting the day when their great sacrifices of 1939 to 1945 will eventually be vindicated and along with that vindication will come the release of the rest of the world from the restraints and the deception that have been imposed upon us all.

God be with us all.

———–

* At the moment it is sitting in the Senate awaiting final reading and approval by the Conservative government of Canada.

The Radical Press would like to pay a special thank you to Mr. Ian V. Macdonald for granting permission to use three of the Star Weekly front page illustrations from his superb book “Star Weekly at War” in this article.

StarWkly@War700

 

Honoring Doug Christie by James Holbeyfield, Counter-Currents Publishing

 photo Counter-CurrentsLogo_zps74edbf7b.png

http://www.counter-currents.com/2013/03/honoring-doug-christie/

DouglasHChristie

Honoring Doug Christie

James Holbeyfield

Douglas Hewson Christie died on March 11th, 2013 at the age of 66. He was among the greatest defense lawyers of his generation, in Canada or any other country, and his greatness was founded on two piers: courage and honor.

In his eulogy for his father, Doug’s son Cadeyrn has said that his father was meant for the battlefield, and in another age would have fought with sword and shield, but in our age, his battlefield was the courtroom.

This identification of warriors with the best lawyers helps us to understand a major lesson of the way Doug Christie lived his life. It is this: the courage to speak freely and publicly against the powerful, the courage to defend those the powerful deem indefensible, and the courage to face threats to career, home, and family from the tolerated minions of the powerful for the sake of principle; all these are first founded on physical courage.

Doug retained tremendous physical courage right up to the end. Incredibly, less than three weeks before he died, his liver riddled with metastatic cancer and refusing pain-killers, so that his brain and his examinations, would be as famously sharp and focused as ever, he had been in court arguing on behalf of a client. There, he collapsed and was brought to hospital. Even then, his chief desire was to be released so that he could finish that case and get back to another, his ongoing defense of Arthur Topham, who has been charged with promoting hate on the internet.

Sadly, that could not be, and Doug’s final regret was that he was unable to carry on for Mr. Topham, just as his greatest concern since he was diagnosed with cancer in 2011 was that once he was gone, there would be no Canadian lawyer to take his place of prominence in battling the endless attacks on freedom of speech in that fallen dominion. Canada is an Anglosphere country that’s particularly vulnerable to the bizarre new ‘tyranny of tolerance’ because it was founded as a nation, not of rebels so much as of men self-selected for conformity, because those men faced a subsequent requirement for an endless, uneasy truce with the pre-existing French population, and because breakdowns in that truce eventually led, under Pierre Trudeau, to a method for reducing its importance by transforming British Canada into multicultural Canada. Unfortunately, Canada shows every sign of needing more lawyers like Doug Christie going forward. Instead, it has lost the only one it had.

If a successor to Doug is waiting in Canada’s future, he will have large shoes to fill. “Very large shoes indeed,” Father Lucien Larré reminded hundreds of mourners at St. Andrew’s Cathedral in Victoria in officiating at Doug’s funeral, “but we must never stop trying to fill them anyway.”

The reason for the magnitude of the task is straightforward: working as a solo lawyer with a staff of one or two assistants, over the course of three decades Doug Christie defined the legal defense of free speech in Canada. When Doug took on his first free speech case in 1983, that of Alberta high-school teacher James Keegstra when he was fired from his job and charged with willfully promoting hatred by discussing Jewish conspiracies with his students, Canada had had criminal hate laws on the books since the 1960s, but they were dormant. “It was a novel proposition to prosecute people for what they said,” Doug reminded the world. But since Keegstra, it has been used scores of times, and Doug Christie was the backbone of the defense in every landmark case. He argued more free speech cases before the Supreme Court of Canada than anyone. All of this from a tiny, sole proprietorship law practice of a type that has now virtually disappeared.

Doug’s widow, Keltie Zubko, has said that his proudest case, which they worked on so hard together, she as legal assistant, was that of Imre Finta. It remains Canada’s only war crimes trial. Following a two-year investigation, the trial took place in three countries, Canada, Hungary. and Israel, over the course of nine months. The prosecution spent millions. It all resulted in Mr. Finta’s acquittal, without needing to call evidence, principally on the basis of Doug’s cross-examination. The prosecution appealed the case to the Supreme Court of Canada, where Doug argued against it so effectively that Canada has never attempted to prosecute a war crimes case since.

But the enemies of our race and of our heritage of freedom are legion; in hyperborean Canada, perhaps white enemies especially. They have power, and they have time. They are hydra-headed, and when one begins to tire, thoughts turning to sinecure, he is easily replaced by many more, as the unquestioning graduates of the academies multiply. Even the youngest have none of the fire in Doug Christie’s soul, but the whole corpus can afford to watch as the tiny band of defenders withers. Worse, a single hydra increasingly sprawls across many countries, in the form of international law.

This is underlined by the fate of Doug’s best-known client, Ernst Zündel. Doug had guided him through the ups and downs of a welter of trials, tribunals and appeals in the 1980s, leading to eventual success in R. v. Zundel before the Supreme Court of Canada in 1992.  But the global enemies of freedom were not to give up. In 2003, the twisted arm of international law reached in among the tens of millions of illegal immigrants in America and plucked Mr. Zündel out of Tennessee for overstaying his legal visa, tore him from his American wife, and brought him back to Canada for two years in solitary confinement while it bided its time. Eventually, Ernst Zündel was deported to Germany, where he was ultimately convicted of holocaust denial in a trial filled with legal misadventures that smacked of the inevitability of religious ritual far more than it resembled anything within the Anglo-Saxon legal tradition. Mr. Zündel spent five more years in prison in Germany, despite everything Doug had tried to do for him in the Canadian phase of this horror.

In such ways as this, the truly heroic war of our time, the war of a tiny number of outcasts to awaken a dispossessed majority, has been transformed. Doug Christie was too busy fighting the battles he could see all around him, one after another in a seemingly endless procession, to devote his great mental incisiveness and physical energy to strategy alone. That is necessarily the way of the hero, of the man who acts. Doug’s great role was in law, not in politics. That was not for lack of trying, and Doug struggled hard within the shrinking opportunities of electoral politics. He never overtly gave up on the political project as a potential solution, but the diminution of his efforts in that direction tells us a lot about the metapolitical nature of our fight today. Actions like his legal battles, and the cultural battle reflected here at Counter-Currents, are the ones we need now.

There is another side to Cadeyrn Christie’s metaphorical tribute to his father as warrior. Doug Christie was a man of principles and a man of honor. That was the yardstick by which he measured every proposal that came to him, whether from others or from within his own creative mind. His whole life was a duel over honor, but not the ferocious intensity of single combat on the Trojan plain; rather tireless, patient resistance.

But the principles are the same. Some men cannot be bought off into slavery, and Doug Christie was the most obvious such man in all the Canada of his generation. All who knew Doug knew he was a man who could have attained early what is considered great success in our world. He was tall, he was good-looking, and he had the manners and blue-eyed charisma of the born leaders of the old American and Canadian West. He was gregarious. People liked him right away and were motivated by him. He had a great legal mind, an appetite and flair for courtroom drama, and the courage to stick out every courtroom battle.

Instead Doug gave of himself unstintingly over many decades to the downtrodden and outcast. He did pro bono work. His friends struggled endlessly to raise money for his cases. He ran his tiny law office on a shoestring.

He lived his whole life the way he had been raised: “we always had enough to eat, but there was never anything left on the table.” He was proud of his Scottish roots in that regard. He drove an old pick-up truck, wore a cowboy hat, and throughout his whole legal career, he earned considerably less each year than can readily be made by skilled tradesmen throughout Western Canada, so long as it remains the prosperous corner of Western civilization that it now is.

Today, the pursuit of money, political approval, and comfort are indeed the chief ways in which a man throws his sword and shield down into the dust. It all happens so gradually that it is vastly more difficult for us to recognize our enslavement than it was for our ancestors. Most men never do, and die with the conceit of freedom.

But even today, some men seem to grasp the real message of our ancestors, almost from earliest youth. Doug Christie was such a man, a true man of honor.

——–

 

The Tyee: Zionist Collaborator and Hate-monger promotes Fear and Smear campaign against Doug Christie

 

 photo TyeeSmear_zps0b6e7a63.png

[Editor’s Note: I was alerted to this vicious smear of Doug Christie, penned by Tyee contributor Tom Hawthorn, by a good friend and associate only this morning.

In their email regarding the Tyee’s hate-filled screed against Doug the writer said, I am SO TICKED off at the slanderous article in the FUCKING TYEE I could spit right now. OH I am so FURIOUS at the Tyee for printing this crap! It is like the author waited for just the right time to loose his venom…. and his readers all agree. DEAR GOD ARTHUR! sick fucks… pardon me …”

Sick fucks indeed! Yet does it come as a surprise to me? No, not at all.

I’ve been monitoring the Tyee since its inception and have been fully cognizant of its editorial position with respect to the machinations of the Jews and their deadly, nefarious ideology known as Zionism. They are but another of the “left”, “liberal”, “progressive”, “yuppie”, “pseudo-alternative”, “mainstream”, “anti-racist”, “marxist” media outlets that wouldn’t say “shit” about the actions of the Jews even if their mouth was full of it (which it is).

By their actions here in posting this vile, hate-filled diatribe against a man who has given his life to fighting against the very forces that these bigoted bastards now have shown themselves to be a part of, it is but another fine example of how Lady Justice always tends to out those who would deceive the general public, sooner or later. Now we know for sure the true intent and focus of “The Tyee” and who they owe their allegiance to.

As my friend pointed out in their email, even the comments (for the most part) by Tyee readers to the malicious and callous denigrating of the recently dead Mr. Christie tended to reflect the type of online community of Zionist sycophants that congregate around its malignant and odious effusions of hate and calumny. The Tyee, in granting this Zionist grunt their headline space to further the lies of the Jews with respect to the righteous and honorable actions of Douglas Christie, has shown its true colours and they just happen to be blue and white, the same as the flag of the state of Israel.

As previously stated I’ve always known there was something fishy smelling about this online blog and one can only hope that after three or more days of exposing this article to the sunshine of truth that the whole of the Tyee’s reputation for being a disseminator of truth and freedom will stink to high heaven and online readers will approach it with a firm grasp of their nose and the caution it clearly deserves.]

—–

I refuse to adorn my site with this pathetic zio bullshit hit piece and would ask of readers to go to the url provided if they wish to get a good whiff of what truth seekers and lovers of freedom of speech are truly up against.

http://thetyee.ca/Life/2013/03/13/The-Unauthorized-Obituary-of-Doug-Christie/

 

 

 

Brave Anti-Zionist & Defender of Human Rights, Doug Christie, Passes at 66

 photo daviddukelogo2_zpsdd4592bc.png

Mar 12, 2013 |

christie&hat300 photo ChristieHat300.jpg

It greatly saddens my heart to tell you who have not yet heard the news, that my long time friend and legal defender, and friend, Doug Christie, died on March 11, 2013.

Attorney Douglas Christie was truly a great man because he stood up courageously against a powerful, unscrupulous foe.  At great cost to himself, his family and his career, he fought to the very end of his life for true human rights and human freedom.

I first met him in the mid-seventies when he fought hard for my right to speak in Canada, and since that time he has defended many anti-Zionist patriots from attempts by the Jewish extremists to imprison them for their non-violent opinions and conscience. Over the years,  Ernst Zundel and many others relied on his untiring efforts for true freedom. Many times he worked tirelessly, facing harassment,  and even physical threats and attacks to help secure the freedom for those who dared to expose the greatest threat to the freedom of Canadians and all mankind: the Zio supremacists.

I must tell you that my visits with Doug will always remain in my memory as some the high points of my life. He was a man gracious, unselfish, humorous, kind, and absolutely fearless in the face of bestial foe.

He pointed out eloquently that the government officials who seek to kidnap men and women from their families and imprison them for years simply for expressing their non-violent opinions — are the true violators of human rights. It is they who should be in prison not the  man who simply speaks his conscience.

The fact that in the European world men and women are being sent to prison, often for years for exercising their inherent human right of  free speech and free conscience, is a stain on all of the European people. Doug Christie sacrificed much of his own time and freedom and money to fight for those who had no means to defend themselves before the tyrannical foe.

I am sad to think that he is no longer with us.

But he will remain in our memories and our hearts. He will live on in the work we will do and he will always be an inspiration to those of us devoted to this struggle.

I know that he rests in peace, for no man has given more of his himself, of his life to his people!

May the memory of Doug Christie inspire you for all your days as he inspires me.

Christie stood strong at the sharpest peaks fighting for Human Rights

He faced the tempest, the demons of repression and hate

Their lightning bolts could not deter him

And his words of truth rang out like thunder in return

They shook the enemy, and shook many of our kindred from their sleep

His work is done and now he passes on to Valhalla’s rest

But his spirit with us we shall always keep!

– Dr. David Duke

 

Douglas H. Christie Passes Over March 11, 2013 Age 66 Rest In Peace

 photo Christiefotosm1-1.jpg

Douglas H. Christie

April 24, 1946 – March 11, 2013

The Lord is my Shepherd; I shall not want.

He maketh me to lie down in green pastures:

He leadeth me beside the still the waters.

He restoreth my Soul:he leadeth me

in the paths of righteousness for His name’s sake.

Yea, though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death,

I will fear no evil: for thou art with me;

thy rod and thy staff they comfort me.

Thou preparest a table before me in the presence of mine enemies:

Thou anointest my head with oil;my cup runneth over.

Surely goodness and mercy shall follow me all the days of my life:

And I will dwell in the house of the Lord forever.

~ Psalm 23

LordismyShepard photo LordismyShepardcopy2.jpg

God bless you Doug. Your life and your work and your love for humanity

will live on and inspire others to carry on the struggle for freedom of speech

and all the other freedoms that will follow in its wake.

Rest in Peace.

CANADIAN OUTLAWS: Truth, Christians and Free Speech fall prey to Zionist misfeasance by Arthur Topham

 photo CanadianOutlaws1_zpsbd51ee59.png

 

CANADIAN OUTLAWS: Truth, Christians and Charter of Rights fall prey to Zionist misfeasance 

By Arthur Topham

March 3, 2013

The recent, decision handed down on Wednesday, February 27, 2013 by six of Canada’s Supreme Court justices, in the Saskatchewan (Human Rights Commission) v Whatcott case, was indeed a ‘supreme’ blow to Christians, to freedom of religion and to every individual’s right to freedom of speech in Canada. At the same time, it also was a remarkably clandestine victory for the foreign Zionist-Jew lobby groups such as B’nai Brith Canada, the Canadian Jewish Congress, and the Canadian Council for Israel and Jewish Advocacy (CIJA); all of whom reflect, represent and condone, in unabashed fashion, the principles and policies of the Zionist state of Israel, over and above the traditional rule of law that has been the hallmark of Canadian jurisprudence from its earliest beginnings.

On top of this victorious legal coup that the vast majority of Canadians remain either ignorant of or in denial of, there are the added collaborating players in this long-range agenda to subvert and mould Canada’s judiciary into a type more in keeping with that of the U.S.A’s; one which, in recent years, has become permeated by their Jewish lobby groups to such an extent that they’ve effectively emasculated the US legal system by introducing their own brand of Jewish Noahide laws into American jurisprudence. These Noahide laws are, in fact, ones that stem from the ancient writings of the Jewish Talmud; a horrendously hoary and convoluted compilation of endless sophistry and intellectual meanderings that attempt to cover the full gamut of possible mental masterbation on any conceivable topic capable of debate, all of which boggles the mind and taxes the heart and soul of anyone who is able to locate and delve into the bottomless pit of arcane, abstruse, macabre deliberations found therein.

It is my contention, based upon all recent research and extrapolation, that this same clandestine, Fifth Column Zionist-instigated seditious process is, and has been, occurring here in Canada since the inception of our nation’s “hate speech laws” that, coincidentally, began to gain ascendency in Canada’s house of justice back in the late 1960’s when the major Jewish lobby groups first began to amalgamate and initiate this calculated, step by step, surreptitious program of incremental changes to Canada’s legal system; one that would eventually see the switch over from former Christian democratic principles of freedom of speech to those of the Talmudic Jewish Noahide laws under which Jewry has operated over the past two millennia.  It is also my added contention that these subtle changes have been, and are being, spearheaded by those very justices of the Supreme Court of Canada who hold duel citizenship with the state of Israel and whose ultimate allegiance, I strongly allege, is first and foremost to that foreign nation.

Compounding and exacerbating this traitorous intent to corrupt and debase Canada’s legal system via “hate crime legislation” is the growing realization by many Canadians that our so-called “independent” media is, in fact, totally controlled, editorially and otherwise, by this same self-serving Zionist Jew consortium and that these media monopolists, along with their line of sycophantic, sayanim journalists and talking heads, are the major propaganda force behind this plot to subvert the Canadian justice system.

Most Canadians who have not been asleep at the wheel politically are now fully cognizant of the fact that the Harper Conservative government is the key to the success of these Zionist “hate crime” operatives and their eventual triumph in binding the mouths and minds of Canadians so that any and all criticism of their planned take-over of the country will not be openly discussed, either in the print media, television or on the Internet. Their arsenal of epithets stands ready 24/7 to support any smear & fear campaign necessary to belittle and slander and denigrate those who show any indication of not bowing down in obeisance to their treasonous scheme to dismantle and re-create our former legal system so as to have it fit harmoniously with all the other nations that have also been infiltrated by these same self-chosen zealots.

The whole of the homosexual agenda is but one of the ruses that these lobbyists use in order to divide, confuse and conquer their opponents and justify, via their human rights commissions, tribunals and their Supreme Court double-agents, the introduction of more and more repressive anti-democratic “hate speech” laws. These tactics, for those who have studied the Zionist’s modus operandi to any degree, are par for the course. The crucial thing for them is to use others rather than come straight out and say we’re bringing in all these repressive, Orwellian laws because we don’t want Canadians discussing and debating our ideology, our motives or our agenda; one that includes enslaving and punishing anyone who steps out of line and beyond that the total destruction of the Christian religion as we now know it.

There is, on top of all these seemingly inexplicable occurrences, a vital question that needs to asked and addressed with respect to the inordinate number of Zionist, duel-citizenship Jewish justices who have somehow wended their way upwards to the apex of Canada’s judicial system and are now literally in positions of supreme power and control with respect to influencing both our Constitution and our Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

Given that Canada is noted world wide for being a proactive, multicultural nation; one that welcomes immigrants from around the world to its shores and touts itself as being an open, free and culturally diverse society, the blatant imbalance that we are witnessing today in the ethnic composition of our Supreme Court justices is beyond question a problem in dire need of explanation.

Were we, as a nation, to give equal opportunity and consideration to the various visible minorities that make up our country’s population then this ought to be reflected in the composition of those who sit in judgement at the top of our federal judicial system.

Knowing that our First Nations population is the largest minority group in Canada it behooves all Canadians to ask the obvious: why do we not have a First Nations justice sitting in on our supreme court? Given that this nation was formed, literally, from the soil of the original people’s land and also given that the First Nations people constitute the largest group in the Canadian population matrix does it not make sense that when it comes to representing their interests that someone from their ranks ought to be a member of this august group of supreme court justices?

Next in line is our Chinese-Canadian population topping the list as the largest visible minority in Canada and again the obvious question is: why do we not have a Chinese-Canadian justice sitting in the SCC?

Next in line we have a very large South Asian population followed by an equally large black population. Where are the South Asian and the Black supreme court justices?

Finally, getting to the crux of this perplexing situation, as we go down the scale of relative population demographics  we come to the ethnic Jewish population in Canada which, according to the Jewish Virtual Library, in 2010 numbered 375,000 in population, ranking somewhere in the neighbourhood of 25th in terms of group size and comprising, out of a total population of 33,890,000 Canadians, 1.1% of Canada’s total population. Yet, for their relatively small numbers in terms of percentages they now hold 4 out of 9 positions on Canada’s Supreme Court. That works out to 44.4% of Canada’s supreme court justices somehow stemming from 1.1 % of the country’s total population. If common sense cannot tell people that there is a glaring discrepancy here then something surely is wrong in the way that Canadians view the make-up of their nation’s highest court.  No amount of intellectual verbiage can explain why this is so without getting into the fundamental question of what the real reasons are for this most obvious of imbalances wherein we have a preponderance of duel-citizen Jewish justices sitting and deliberating the vital questions currently being discussed in this brief essay.

Of course the immediate reaction from the Zionist lobbies is to reach up their proverbial sleeve and pull out their “anti-Semitic” and “hate speech” cards and flash them across the nation via their controlled media in typical fashion whenever their power base is questioned or threatened. Then will follow their sophistry and rhetoric emanating from the academics and talking heads arguing that this blatant discrepancy is simply due to the fact that Jewish lawyers are the most intelligent, experienced and therefore qualified of all of Canada’s lawyers and, like the cream atop the cow’s milk, they naturally rise up to those positions of eminence and power.

As the kids would say, “Yah, sure.”

To conclude, it cannot be stressed or repeated enough that we either have free speech or we have controlled speech where Big Brother takes control of our conscience and our mind and leaves us as automatons and slaves to do their bidding and those who now sit in judgement over our collective rights , due to their recent actions in the Whatcott case, must be treated with the utmost suspicion and their motives fully analyzed.

The time to act on these concerns is yesterday. Tomorrow may be too late.

The SCC Puppets

I present below the figures of the three Ashkenazi Zionists who have, along with their controllers in Tel Aviv and elsewhere, and the other three Shabbez Goi justices, perpetrated this seditious act of attempting to twist the truth and our human right to freedom of speech into some form of kosher, Zionist fritter all the better to fragment and confuse the people of Canada so as to lure our nation further astray into the nightmare that awaits the world should Zionism ever gain full control over independent nation states.

It must also be adamantly born in mind as well that the fact that I am presenting and focusing on these three individuals is absolutely not to be misconstrued as having excused the other three protagonists in this deceptive legal drama. The primary purpose here is accent the Jewish lobby in Canad and its unsavory effect upon Canada’s legal system. It goes without saying that the other three justices have, for whatever reasons, also consented to this agenda and ought to be removed from their positions along with the three Zionist duel-citizen justices in question here.

McLachlin photo McLachlincopy_zps96a077d6.png

With respect to Canada’s current Madam Chief Justice McLachlin it is also relevant and fitting that the following quote by Jason Moscovitz of the CBC be mentioned here as it is most relevant to an understanding of the mindset of these six judicial side-kicks when it comes to our right to freedom of speech.  Jason Moscovitz states: “Of all the attributes she brings to the high court, there is one that sticks out. Many legal experts say she does not consider the Charter of Rights to be necessarily sacred.” [Jason Moscovitz CBC Date: 991103 Time: 22:00:00 ET – 22:26:00 ET]

AbellaFlag photo abellaFlag_zpsbf55ffb4.png

While still in her twenties SCC Abella was appointed a member of the Human Rights Commission of Ontario. Her husband, Irving Abella, is the J. Richard Shiff Professor of Canadian Jewish Studies at York University in Toronto and a past president of the Canadian Jewish Congress, one of the leading “hate speech law” lobby groups in Canada.

SCC Justice Abella is on the International Board of the Hebrew University, a member of the United States Holocaust Museum’s Committee on Conscience (again, pushing the 6 million lies of the Zionists that have become since WWII one of the principal pillars supporting all of their criminal actions since that time).

The president (Canadian Section) of the International Commission of Jurists, cited her as one whose “entire life has revolved around the cause of human rights… She has shaped Canadian policy in equality rights, and…has also had a profound impact on human rights law and policy outside Canada.” The precise manner in HOW SCC has “shaped Canadian policy in equality rights” is now fairly apparent given her complicity in this recent and deplorable attack upon Canada’s unquestionable right to freedom of speech.

SCC Justice Abella also served as a commissioner on the Ontario Human Rights Commission. Again, those who have been complicit in the actions of the human “rights” commissions here in Canada have revealed their motives clearly enough over the past decade and longer and have lost credibility in the eyes of the rest of the 98% of Canada who do not want to have their rights tampered with to satisfy the spurious and fraudulent false front arguments of special minority groups.

FishFlag photo FishFlag_zps0946efd9.png

True to his name there’s definitely something “fishy” about this lastest SCC decision.

 

RothsteinFlag photo RothsteinFlag_zps2256d32f.png

SCC Justice Rothstein has served as an adjudicator under the Manitoba Human Rights Act from 1978 to 1983 and as a member of the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal from 1986 to 1992. He has also held many other offices or appointments connected to the Manitoba Human Rights Act and the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal.

So what have people like Marshall Rothstein learned from all of their involvement in harassing and vilifying and criminalizing Canadians for having exercised their God-given right to freedom of expression and speech? By all appearances he’s learned that the manipulation of the law,when it is being supported by a Fifth Column media and a host of complicit, compromised politicians under the sway of the Zionist lobby, is relatively easy to accomplish and virtually a fait accompli.

———

Mark Dankof’s America: Interview with Radical Press publisher Arthur Topham Wed. Feb. 27

Dankof ad

CLICK HERE

Marc Lemire Case: the latest attack on Freedom of Speech by the Canadian Human Rights Commission

Marc Lemire Case: the latest attack on Freedom of Speech by the Canadian Human Rights Commission

By

Christopher di Armani 

http://christopherdiarmani.com/8968/big-brother/marc-lemire-case-latest-attack-freedom-speech-canadian-human-rights-commission/

I had a long conversation with Marc Lemire on Wednesday evening, December 19, 2012.

For those not familiar with his name, Marc Lemire is the one and only man to ever win a case against the Canadian Human Rights Commission (CHRC). Until Lemire was hauled before this Kangaroo Court the Canadian Human Rights Commission had a 100% conviction rate.

It’s really not that hard when the Truth is no defense and the “judge” can disallow any evidence you present without justifying that action.

Anyway, there was a development in his case this week that does not bode well for the Rights and Freedoms of ALL Canadians. Marc Lemire just happens to be the person being terrorised in this particular manner today.

It is important to remember a few things about Marc Lemire’s case.

1. As soon as Marc Lemire was made aware of the complaints against him, he removed the “offending material” from his website.

2. Despite the “offending material” being removed from the internet, the CHRC refused to drop the case against Mr. Lemire.

3. Repeated attempts by Marc Lemire and his lawyer Barbara Kulaszka at mediation with the CHRC was refused. This wasn’t about “remediation” as the law says, but about silencing individuals with whom the CHRC disagrees.

4. Marc Lemire was found “guilty” of a single infraction. That infraction was for a post on his website that he did NOT create, and contained an article written by an American author. Marc Lemire had nothing to do with the “offending” post, other than to host the website it was on.

5. The Canadian Human Rights Tribunal in Marc Lemire’s case admitted that Section 13 of the Human Rights Act is unconstitutional.

6. The Canadian Human Rights Tribunal in Marc Lemire’s case refused to administer the penalty against him because they knew it was unconstitutional.

7. The Canadian Parliament has already repealed Section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act. It is waiting for the Canadian Senate to pass it as well, which will happen early this coming year, and then Section 13 will be repealed.

8. Despite all these facts, the boneheads at the CHRC are now pushing for a lifetime BAN on Marc Lemire’s Freedom of Speech while they still can.

They’re desperate to implement their ban on Marc Lemire while this atrocious law is still on the books.

Once Lemire is stripped of his Freedom of Speech by a federal court order, it won’t matter if Section 13 is repealed or ruled unconstitutional. The lifetime ban will still apply.

That is wrong on so many levels I don’t even know where to begin.

Marc Lemire is now battling for his (and OUR) Right to Freedom of Speech on two fronts.

First, at the Federal Court of Appeals, where he is appealing the finding of Justice Mosley. Mosley found that Section 13 was constitutional, but that Section 54 (the penalty clause) was not.

It’s an absurd decision and one that Marc Lemire is fighting to overturn with his appeal. Lemire has also filed a 240 page motion to the Federal Court of Appeals requesting a stay of the earlier Federal Court ruling so the CHRC cannot issue a lifetime speech ban against him.

Second, at the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal, where Lemire will fight the proposed lifetime ban.

If Freedom of Speech is important to you, then please give generously to Marc Lemire’s Legal Defense Fund. He desperately needs your help as he fights for the Right to Freedom of Speech for ALL Canadians.

You can donate with your check via Canada Post, payable to:

Marc Lemire
Attn: Free Speech Legal Defence Fund
762 Upper James St, Suite 384
Hamilton, ON  L9C 3A2

If you would prefer to give online, please send your donation via PayPal.

Anyone giving $50 or more to Marc Lemire’s Legal Defense Fund will receive a digital copy of Lemire’s book Dismantling Tyranny.

 

Remember… The choice is Free Speech or Approved Speech.  If Marc Lemire loses this case, Canadians will forever be subjected to “Approved Speech” by minions of The State.

That’s not the kind of Canada I want to live in, and I hope you feel the same.  Support Marc Lemire’s fight for OUR Right to Freedom of Speech without government intervention.

————————-

You can see the article online at:  http://christopherdiarmani.com/8968/big-brother/marc-lemire-case-latest-attack-freedom-speech-canadian-human-rights-commission/

 

 

Radical Press Legal Update #7

NewLegalUpdateLogo-700

notice4RP

Radical Press Legal Update #7

Radical Press Legal Update #7

Yesterday’s  Bail  Hearing was a three hour session in the Quesnel Court house.

The regular Judge who has been presiding over the various applications thus far was unable to attend and instead we had a female Judge by the name of M. Church who heard the application.

Crown of course had first kick at the cat and Crown Council Jennifer Johnston opened her remarks by giving Judge Church a brief overview of the case which included her reasons for why Crown has still not provided my lawyer with full disclosure in the case.

According to CC Johnston the period from my initial arrest on May 16, 2012 until October 9, 2012 had proven to be an insufficient time period in order to get enough evidence together so that an Indictment could be handed down by the October 9 deadline and that, apparently, somehow justified not providing Mr. Christie with full disclosure.

After the October 9 deadline I was no longer under the original bail conditions that restricted me from posting on my website although for some odd reason I didn’t become aware of this fact until close to 3 weeks after the fact .

The Crown eventually got their sworn information on November 5, 2012 and notified my lawyer that there would be a call date set for Nov. 6 where I was to appear in court. That date was subsequently changed to the 8th of November as Doug Christie was out in Saskatchewan attending to another case and couldn’t appear via telephone on the 6th. It was Crown’s letter to Mr. Christie on Nov. 5th that also informed him that Crown had asked for an endorsed warrant that would allow Crown to have all of the original bail conditions reinstated.

When I appeared on November 8, 2012 the Judge listened to both sides of the arguments and ruled that only some of the original conditions would remain i.e., those concerning my order not to have any contact with the two knaves  who laid the alleged complaint to the RCMP and also the cops hanging on to my illegally stolen firearms. At the same time he set a new date of December 13, 2012 when Mr. Christie could be in court to represent me and Crown would be given the opportunity to argue for the reinstatement of the additional restrictions originally imposed on me by Det – Cst Terry Wilson on the day I got out of jail.

Of course December 13, 2012 proved to be bad timing weather wise and my lawyer was unable to fly into Quesnel that day so again a decision on Crown’s application was delayed for another week which brought it up to December 19, 2012 which was yesterday.

After running through that time line Crown then began their argument for wanting to reinstate the additional Orwellian restraints that would prohibit me from posting articles anywhere on the Internet available to the general public or to allow anyone else to post on any of my other websites that were owned by me.

Just prior to commencing her argument Crown Council Jennifer Johnston told Judge Church that unfortunately she hadn’t been able to provide Mr. Christie with the big fat 1″ thick bail disclosure document because she had been informed by Det – Cst Terry Wilson that when the Indictment was handed down the National Post had published an article on the case which contained statements that the reporter had gleaned from another website called FreeDominion.ca. Those statements were from what is called a “Warned” statement which is considered by the courts to be part of disclosure and therefore confidential information that is not supposed to be given out to the public. The Warned statement was a digital voice recording that Det – Cst Terry Wilson had made of his conversation with me just prior to my release from jail on May 16, 2012. Why IT was given to my lawyer when all the other disclosure documents are still being withheld by Crown is still a mystery to both myself and Mr. Christie but in the case of this particular document when I received a copy of it I didn’t realize it was confidential and had so I had shared it with an associate in a private email and unbeknownst to myself failed to notify them that it was confidential.

Anyhow a couple of quotes were taken from it and posted in the National Post and that was the big reason, according to CC Jennifer Johnston why she was refusing to divulge any more disclosure materials to Mr. Christie. This issue had come up on Dec. 13 when Crown was arguing before Judge Morgan that a second application had been filed regarding the matter of the illegal disclosure but no agreement could be found at the time and Mr. Christie had refused to agree to it.

At this point Crown told Judge Church that she would be willing to let Mr. Christie take a look at the bail disclosure document even though Crown’s application had not be resolved but that he would have to give it back at the end of the hearing! All of this was the typical Catch-22 scenarios that have been playing out since day one of this charade.

The Judge obviously knew that Mr. Christie couldn’t be expected to argue against something he hadn’t even seen so after a bit of discussion it was agreed that Crown would give Mr. Christie the disclosure document and a short 15 minute recess would be called so that he and I would have an opportunity to take a look at what Crown was planning to use in their argument for reinstating the original harsh bail conditions on me.

It only took about 5 minutes of perusing the document to realize what was going to be the Crown’s argument and we quickly went back and let the clerk know that the recess should end as soon as possible and court resume. Mr. Christie was well aware of the time constraints and needed every minute for his arguments.

Court resumed and Crown Council Johnston began her argument that I had been publishing all these articles, updates, etc. since November 2, 2012 (legally, mind you) and then proceeded to go through individual posts selecting various quotes to back up her position. It was the standard Zionist double-speak argument that posts were continuing to spread hate toward the Jews and Zionists and were attacking unfairly Det -Cst Terry Wilson and his partner-in-crime Cst Normandie Levas and thus possibly endangering their safety!

This went on until about 3 p.m. when she finally concluded her remarks and a break was taken before Mr. Christie was given time to present his arguments.

The issue of the leaked disclosure was addressed first and Mr. Christie told that Judge that he would have no problem with the Court issuing an Order stating that in future neither he nor myself would disclose any confidential information to any third parties not directly connected to the case and definitely not for publication.

Doug then commenced his argument with a bountiful supply of case law references and quickly outlined for the Judge some precedents which included the legal right for publishers and writers to criticize both Jews and Zionists citing articles in various mainstream publications like the New York Times and other Zionist controlled media. His point being that no particular group is exempt from criticism and that includes Jews or those who support political Zionism. Regarding my criticisms of the RCMP he also pointed out to the court that the RCMP were certainly not above criticism and given their public image of late he didn’t feel Crown’s argument in this regard was worthy of consideration.

He also made it crystal clear that what Crown was attempting to do flew in the face of any and all statutes currently within the Canadian legal system. By that I mean Crown’s attempt to curtail my Charter Rights to freedom of expression and access to the Internet prior to my case being heard in a court of law and a decision being handed down as to whether or not I did in fact publish materials that were ultimately deemed to be “willful promotion of hatred” as contained in sec. 319(2) of the Canadian Criminal Code.

To a priori assume that whatever I am publishing is “hatred” and then ask the court to impose such severe curtailments upon my Charter rights prior to being tried is verboten and should not be considered as a reasonable argument.

During Crown’s argument CC Johnston had cited the Basi-Virk Trial (of all trials!) to back up some of her comments regarding the need to protect witnesses. In this instances she was trying to correlate my Warned statement conversation with Det – Cst Terry Wilson with that of secondary witnesses in the Basi-Verk case. When Doug came to this he quickly pointed out to the Judge the vast difference between witness evidence by anonymous third parties and statements directly given to the arresting officer by the accused as was the case in point regarding Crown’s argument.

One by one Mr. Christie countered Crown Council’s arguments and this went on until around 4:15 p.m. at which time Mr. Christie concluded his remarks by informing the Judge that he had a plane to catch before 5 p.m. and that he would have to stop. Doug asked me at this point to call the airport to confirm the exact time when the plane was leaving so I had to leave the court room for about five minutes.

While I was gone Crown apparently tried to refute all of Doug’s arguments and told the Judge that because I was charged with a “Hate” crime that Crown could then basically impose whatever restrictions they wanted to on me. The Judge apparently wasn’t convinced and just when I got back into the court room I heard her telling Crown and Defence that she would be considering the arguments and submitting a request to another body (not sure which one at this point) for further clarification come early January and then after that she would notify Crown and Defence of her decision.

So basically there will be no further bail conditions imposed on myself until January of 2013 at the earliest. We quickly packed up our things and drove Doug out to the airport where he bid us a fond fair well.

For now we will finally have a couple of weeks grace in order to relax a bit and enjoy the Christmas season.

——–

NOTE: Out of necessity I am forced to ask for financial assistance in this ongoing battle with the censors. Due to the fact that the Crown is refusing to give the required disclosure to my lawyer I am not able to furnish legal aid with the required documents that they demand before looking at whether or not I might qualify for legal financial assistance. This leaves me in the unenviable position of having to rely solely upon donations to pay for my legal expenses. The airfare alone yesterday for my lawyer to appear in court in Quesnel to defend me against these false charges was $1,050.00 return and given my minimal monthly pension it’s virtually impossible for me to cover these expenses.
As such I would once again implore readers to give serious consideration to helping me out by either sending a donation via PayPal using either a PayPal account or a credit card or else sending a cheque or Money Order to me via snail mail at the following postal address. Cash of course also works.
Arthur Topham
4633 Barkerville Highway
Quesnel, B.C.
Canada
V2J 6T8
To access my PayPal button please go to either the Home Page at http://www.radicalpress.com or my blog http://www.quesnelcariboosentinel.com The PayPal button is up on the right hand corner of the Home Page on either site.
Sincerely,
Arthur Topham
Pub/Ed
The Radical Press

 

 

 

 

 

CHRC: Gag Lemire Now – Who cares whether or not Section 13 is constitutional?

 

CHRC: Gag Lemire Now – Who cares whether or not Section 13 is constitutional?

 

Fanatical CHRC wants to impose a lifetime speech ban against Marc Lemire and refuses to wait for Court of Appeals to even rule on the constitutionality of the internet censorship law

http://blog.freedomsite.org/2012/12/chrc-gag-lemire-now-who-cares-whether.html

http://canadianhumanrightscommission.blogspot.ca/2012/12/chrc-gag-lemire-now-who-cares-whether.html

The fanatical and discredited Canadian Human Rights Commission is demanding that a lifetime speech ban be placed on internet webmaster Marc Lemire – and they are refusing to even allow the Federal Court of Appeals to make a ruling on the Constitutionality of Canada’s shameful internet censorship legislation – Section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act.

The utter arrogance and obsession with censorship that infests all those who staff the Canadian Human Rights Commission is shocking to many Canadians.  Is it any wonder that its senior investigators consider freedom of speech to be “an American concept?”

But even in the face of their censorship empire (Section 13) crumbling around them, the censors insist on remaining aboard a sinking ship.” 

Over the past few years, Canadians of all political stripes have roundly condemned the fanatical and outrageous behavior of the Canadian Human Rights Commission and their “nazi fetishist” investigators.  Front page articles in the National Post denounced the CHRC.  Editorials from every major mainstream newspaper have called for the CHRC to get out of the thought control business.  The House of Commons has voted to repeal Section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act and that bill is now before the Senate of Canada.   In the Lemire case, the handpicked Canadian Human Rights Tribunal was so disgusted over how the CHRC was conducting itself that a Senior Tribunal member not only found that Section 13 was unconstitutional, but that it was also an affront to the guarantees of freedom of speech in our Charter of Rights and Freedoms

As is typical for the elitist CHRC censors, they simply brushed aside all legitimate criticism. They responded by once again screwing Canadian taxpayers by hiring the super expensive public relations firm Hill & Knowlton for a whopping $170,000! This was a futile and an expensive attempt to reverse the tide of public opinion that was turning against them. But a leopard never changes its spots as the CHRC continued with its devious ways, including spying and trying to entrap Marc Lemire.

So desperate was the CHRC to repair the damage that had been done to its image that it hand picked an expert to write a review of Section 13. After collecting a hefty sum of money, the reviewer turned on them by recommending thatSection 13 be repealed! The only people supporting the CHRC’s draconian thought control regime were those who were directly paid and/or living off the ‘human rights teat.’

Knowing that their days of harassing and abusing Internet writers, bloggers and message board owners are numbered, the CHRC censors knew that the only thing they can do now, is to grind many people through the systems as possible, before their house of cards comes crashing down.

But they have a big problem, and that problems name is Marc Lemire!

Because of his nine year legal battle with the CHRC, and the fact that all human rights cases have been stopped pending a final determination in his case, the CHRC can’t pull out its Coup de grace, and issue lifetime speech bans on all those waiting.

Not only do they demand that a lifetime free speech ban be applied on Marc Lemire, but they don’t even have the decency to wait for the Federal Court of Appeals to rule whether Section 13 is even constitutional.

The CHRC has refused to agree to a stay of an earlier decision of the Federal Court – which is currently under appeal to the Federal Court of Appeals.  As crazy as that sounds, the CHRC is pushing for the punishment against Lemire even before the Federal Court of Appeals can even examine the case.

Because of the CHRC’s refusal; this now opens up a costly two-front battle that Lemire has to face.  While before the Federal Court of Appeals, he also has to fight a case before the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal simultaneously.

Merry Christmas from Lemire:  Motion to Stay

As an early Christmas present to the censors, Marc Lemire has filed a 240 page motion to the Federal Court of Appeals requesting a stay of the earlier Federal Court ruling so that the CHRC cannot issue a lifetime speech ban against Lemire.

Here is a copy of the motion filed with the Federal Court of Appeals on December 11th, 2012, written by Marc Lemire’s courageous and brilliant lawyer – Barbara Kulaszka.

 

APPLICANT’S WRITTEN REPRESENTATIONS

1.      The Canadian Human Rights Tribunal, in a decision dated September 2, 2009, held that the applicant had contravened s. 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act by posting an article entitled AIDS Secrets on his website, the Freedomsite.  However, the Tribunal also concluded that s. 13(1) in conjunction with ss. 54(1) and (1.1) were inconsistent with s. 2(b) of the Charter, which guaranteed the freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression in that these provisions were not a reasonable limit within the meaning of s. 1 of the Charter. Since a formal declaration of invalidity was not a remedy available to the Tribunal, it refused to apply the provisions for the purposes of the complaint against the applicant and did not issue any remedial order against him. [CHRT Decision, para. 307 at Motion Record, page 116]

2.      The respondent Canadian Human Rights Commission filed a judicial review application which was allowed by Mr. Justice Mosley of the Federal Court on October 2, 2012. He upheld the constitutionality of section 13 by severing the penalty provisions of the Act which he declared unconstitutional. [Agent Y v. Lemire, [2012] F.C.J. No. 1233 at Motion Record, pp. 119-187]

3.      The Federal Court held that the application for judicial review was granted and the following judgment granted:

1. The application for judicial review is granted and the matter is remitted to

the Tribunal to;

a. issue a declaration that the publication of the article “AIDS Secrets”

by the respondent Marc Lemire constituted a breach of s 13 of the

Canadian Human Rights Act ; and

b. for determination of whether a remedy for the breach is to be

imposed under ss. 13 and 54(1)(a) and (b) of the Act;

2. It is declared that ss 54 (1) (c) and 54 (1.1) of the Canadian Human Rights

Act are of no force or effect pursuant to s 52 (1) of The Constitution Act,

1982, being schedule B to the Canada Act 1982 (U.K.), 1982, c. 11,1982;

3. The respondent Agent Y is awarded costs for the preparation of

his record and his out of pocket disbursements for attendance at the

hearing against the respondent Marc Lemire.

[Judgment of the Federal Court, at Motion Record, p. 187]

4.      The applicant filed a Notice of Appeal from the decision of Mr. Justice Mosley on the following grounds:

(a)    Mr. Justice Mosley erred in applying the doctrine of severance in upholding s. 13 and ss. 54(1)(a) and (b) of the Canadian Human Rights Act;

(b)   Mr. Justice Mosley erred in basing his decision on a misreading of the Canadian Human Rights Act as it existed at the time s. 13 was upheld as a reasonable limit on freedom of expression under s. 1 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms by the Supreme Court of Canada in Canada (Human Rights Commission) v. Taylor, [1990] 3 S.C.R. 892;  this misreading of the Act informed the reasons given by Mr. Justice Mosley and led him into further error in upholding the constitutionality of s. 13 and 54(1)(a) and (b) of the Canadian Human Rights Act;

(c)    Pursuant to s. 50(2) of the Canadian Human Rights Act;  the Tribunal was entitled to examine the real and factual context in which s. 13 and s. 54 existed in determining whether the provisions remained a reasonable limit on freedom of expression within the meaning of  s. 1 of the Charter, including the manner in which complaints were prosecuted and the practical operation of the statutory scheme. The decision of the Tribunal that this evidence showed that ss. 13 and 54 were no longer a reasonable limit on freedom of expression was correct;

(d)   The extension in 2001 in the Anti- Terrorism Act, S.C. 2001, c. 41 of the application of s. 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act from telephone answering machines, as considered in Taylor,  to computer networks, including the Internet, has rendered s. 13 an unreasonable and unjustifiable limit on freedom of expression within the meaning of s. 1 of the Charter;

(e)    The allegation of “hatred” in s. 13 of the Act imports moral blameworthiness and stigma which renders the provision an unreasonable and unjustifiable limit on freedom of expression pursuant to s. 1 of the Charter;

(f)     The words “hatred” and “contempt” in s. 13 are vague, overbroad and highly subjective, rendering the provision an unreasonable and unjustifiable limit on freedom of expression within the meaning of  s. 1 of the Charter;

(g)    There is no rational, non-arbitrary or fair connection between s. 13 and the objectives of the Canadian Human Rights Act, rendering the provision an unreasonable and unjustifiable limit on freedom of expression within the meaning of s. 1 of the Charter;

(h)    Mr. Justice Mosley erred in challenging and reversing findings of fact made by the Tribunal to which he owed deference;

(i)      Mr. Justice Mosley erred in failing to respect and defer to Parliament’s repeal of s. 13 and s. 54(1) and (1.1) in Bill C-304, which passed the House of Commons on June 6, 2012 to protect freedom of expression.

5.      The article which the Tribunal found contravened section 13 was voluntarily removed from the Freedomsite by the applicant on April 9, 2004, some two weeks after he received notice of the complaint from the Commission.

6.      Only 8 persons from Canada viewed the article, a number which would include the applicant, the complainant Agent Y and the investigators at the respondent Canadian Human Rights Commission.

7.      The Canadian Human Rights Tribunal has adjourned two pending cases before it under section 13 on a sine die basis, until final determination of this case.

8.      In Canadian Jewish Congress v. Makow[2010] C.H.R.D. No. 13 the Tribunal held:

    I have reviewed the submissions of the parties and have concluded that it would be appropriate and would properly serve the interests of justice if this matter was adjourned. While the Supreme Court of Canada has ruled in Canada (Human Rights Commission) v. Taylor, 1990 3 S.C.R. 892 that s. 13 (1) of the CHRA is constitutional, the application now before the Federal Court seeks to bring clarity to this issue in view of the distinct factual and legal context giving rise to this Tribunal’s decision in Agent Y v. Lemire. Clearly Member Hadjis’ decision goes beyond the consideration alone of the penalty provisions in s. 54 of the CHRA, as he chose not to “read out” the penalty provisions and preserve s. 13 of the CHRA. It is now up to the Federal Court to determine the operability of s. 13 of the CHRA. This will achieve the clarity that the Commission has indicated and that I agree is desirable in order to allow the Tribunal to be able to determine this and other cases brought under s. 13 of the CHRA.

    For these reasons I hereby adjourn these proceedings sine die pending the final outcome in the Agent Y v. Lemire case.

9.      A similar ruling was made in Agent X v. Topham[2010] C.H.R.D. No. 14.

ARGUMENT

10.  This  Court is granted the jurisdiction to impose a stay of proceedings pursuant to Rule 50(1)(b) of the Federal Courts Rules which provides:

50. (1) The Federal Court of Appeal or the Federal Court may, in its discretion, stay proceedings in any cause or matter

(a)…

(b) where for any other reason it is in the interest of justice that the proceedings be stayed.

11.  In RJR-MacDonald Inc. v. Canada (Attorney General), [1994] 1 S.C.R. 311, the Supreme Court of Canada set out a three-part test for determining whether a stay should be granted: (1) Whether there is a serious question to be tried; (2) Whether the applicant would suffer irreparable harm if the relief is not granted; and (3) Whether the balance of convenience is in favour of granting the stay.

(a)   Serious question to be tried

12.  It is submitted that the case raises a serious issue to be tried, namely, the constitutionality of  section 13 and ss. 54(1)(a) and (b) of the Canadian Human Rights Act.

13.  The Notice of Appeal raises serious issues with respect to the effect on freedom of speech of section 13, including whether the doctrine of severance was correctly applied by Mr. Justice Mosley and whether section 13 is still a justifiable limitation on Charter rights to free speech under s. 2(b) given its legislative extension in 2001 to the Internet and other computer mediated networks.

(b)   Irreparable harm

14.  If the matter is remitted back to the Tribunal, it can no longer issue a penalty order as the provisions authorizing such an order have been declared unconstitutional by the Federal Court. However, it can issue a cease and desist order against the applicant which is in effect for his lifetime and is a direct violation of his freedom of speech. The order, once made, would remain in effect notwithstanding any subsequent finding in this case that section 13 is unconstitutional.

15.  No damages can compensate the applicant for the loss of his right to free speech under such a cease and desist order.

(c)    Balance of convenience

16.  The article “AIDS Secrets” was voluntarily removed by the applicant in April of 2004 in an effort to settle the complaint, some two weeks after he received notice of the complaint. His remedial actions were ignored by the Canadian Human Rights Commission and the complainant, who instead began a search for other material with which to sustain the complaint. None of those other communications were found to be a violation of the Act.

17.  The public interest is not damaged by a stay of the order of Mr. Justice Mosley since the article found to contravene section 13 is not on the applicant’s website and has not been for almost nine years.  Only 8 persons from Canada looked at the article and probably all of those persons were those involved in the complaint, including the complainant, investigators from the Canadian Human Rights Commission and the applicant himself.

18.  There are presently only two cases pending before the Tribunal, that of Makow and Tophamsupra. Both cases have been adjourned sine die by the Tribunal pending final resolution of the Lemire case in order to obtain clarification of the law. This has been a well-founded caution since the penalty provisions of section 13 were declared unconstitutional.

19.  In the meantime, the House of Commons repealed section 13 and its remedial provisions in section 54 by Bill C-304 on June 6, 2012 to protect freedom of speech. The Bill is now at second reading before the Senate. The House of Commons recognized the threat section 13 posed to the freedoms of Canadians and passed a bill to repeal the law. This factor must play an important role in determining the balance of convenience in granting a stay.

Order Requested

20.  The applicant requests:

(a)    an order staying the judgment of Mr. Justice Mosley in Canadian Human Rights Commission v. Lemire, T-1640-09 pending final determination of the herein appeal;

(b)   Costs of the motion.

 ————————————

Can I count on you to support the cause of freedom and rid Canada of this disgusting though control legislation? My courageous lawyer Barbara Kulaszka and I have demonstrated what two dedicated freedom fighters can accomplish against overwhelming odds. We have single-handedly and doggedly fought the system and exposed the corrupt underbelly of the “Human Rights” Commission’s racket. Nothing ever comes easy when you are fighting such fanatical censors. This case is a seminal one, where the outcome will have serious implications on our right to think and speak freely in this country for generations to come. All Canadians will benefit when we manage to get this shameful law expunged from our legal books.

I cannot carry on this important fight alone. Your donations literally equal the survival of this case. No organizations are assisting with the bill at all.

Please support Marc Lemire’s Constitutional Challenge of Section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act.

Marc Lemire is the only person to beat the CHRC in it’s 33 year history!

Marc Lemire

762 Upper James St

Suite 384

Hamilton, Ontario

L9C 3A2

 

Email:  marc@lemire.com

Web:  http://www.freedomsite.org | http://www.StopSection13.com

Twitter:  @marc_lemire

 

 

Radical Press Legal Update #6

NewLegalUpdateLogo-700

notice4RP

Dear Supporters of a Free Internet and Freedom of Speech,

Please bear with me as this update will be a bit longer than normal but I think highly informative as well.
It’s been two weeks since I last gave an update on my court case involving B’nai Brith Canada (aka Regina) versus Arthur Topham and RadicalPress.com, a pivotal, precedent-setting legal case that will ultimately determine whether Canada will succumb to the likes of all those other so-called “democratic” countries like Germany, France, Spain, Australia, etc. who have been co-opted by the Rothschild criminal cartel and now have their freedom of speech curtailed by “HATE CRIME” laws that don’t permit any questioning of either the rogue and racist state of Israel or any other aspect of the Zionist Jew agenda to turn the world into a giant gulag ruled over by the Star of David.

To say the least this session was particularly crazy in a number of ways.

First off we awoke in the early morning to find ourselves in the midst of a major snow storm! That meant getting the driveway cleared so we could get into town to attend court and as there was no time for me to shovel the 300 foot swath to the Barkerville Hwy we had to call the neighbour and get him to come over with his snow-clearing machine.

Meanwhile I tried to call my lawyer Doug Christie to check on things but I was unable to reach him on his cell phone. The court time for the bail hearing was set for 1:30 p.m. I called the local airport to see if Doug’s flight was still on schedule only to find that it wasn’t happening. As it turned out the plane made it from Vancouver International airport as far as Williams Lake (the next city about 90 km south of Quesnel), circled for awhile and then due to poor visibility was forced to return to Vancouver.

Realizing this of course created a number of questions in terms of what might occur when we got to the courthouse in Quesnel.

Upon reaching town over roads that were in dire need of plowing we went into the government building where the courts are located around 1 p.m. only to find the place basically empty with the exception of some supporters who had come to view the session. I went upstairs to the court registry to see what was up and was told that it wouldn’t be happening until 2 p.m. and that Mr. Christie would be appearing via telephone instead of in person. I knew right then that we would be encountering some difficulties as my lawyer and I had already discussed the importance of him being there in the flesh in the courtroom due to the strident actions of Crown council during the last session on November 30th.

Having a few minutes to kill, my wife and I went for a quick bite before the court resumed.

There are normally a number of different cases on the docket during the afternoon but on this day my case was the only one so the gallery was empty except for one mysterious elderly woman who was in attendance. She was probably in her mid to late 70?s and appeared to be following my wife and I around as we awaited the opening of the doors leading into the court room. My immediate impression was that she was a local sayanim (Isreali supporter and operative) sent out by B’nai Brith to observe the session.

Crown council Jennifer Johnston was there raring to go as usual with her mountains of files and folders stacked up on the table below the Judge’s bench. While we sat quietly awaiting the Judge’s entrance into the room CC Johnston added a new prop to her planned submission to the Judge by setting up an additional little podium on the table that looked a bit like a soap box or a preacher’s pulpit where I assumed she would be placing her papers and her Criminal Code book as she commenced her flamboyant actions against me on behalf of Rothschild’s front organization B’nai Brith Canada.

Judge Morgan, the Judge who has been sitting in on this charade for the majority of the sessions of late, came in and court immediately commenced the clerk having already called Mr. Christie on his cell phone a few minutes prior to the Judge appearing.

Crown council Johnston immediately rattled off the case numbers and proceeded to get right into it but the Judge had to soon interrupt her and allow Mr. Christie to state some things regarding the defence’s side of the issue.

During the last session on November 30th Mr. Christie had reiterated, as he has been reiterating for the past 6 months now, that he is STILL awaiting Disclosure from the Crown. What that means for those unfamiliar with court room procedure is that he has not received from the Crown the documents which state what exactly it is that I am being charged with, what the sentencing is that the Crown is asking and what the contents or evidence is that the Crown is planning to use in their offensive efforts to convict me of this spurious “HATE CRIME” also known as sec. 319(2) of the Criminal Code of Canada. This procedure of furnishing the defence with the Disclosure is standard practise in all litigation yet the Crown has been stalling and stalling and back-pedalling on the issue since I was first arrested on May 16th, 2012.

During the November 30th session Judge Morgan had asked Crown council to get the Disclosure documents to Mr. Christie by no later a date than December 11th, 2012 so that he would have (a very limited amount of) time to study the charges and prepare to address the proposed arguments of Crown as they pertained to the bail conditions which CC Johnston is hell-bent on imposing upon me. Well, as usual, this again didn’t happen and instead Mr. Christie got word at the last minute that instead of receiving the required information Crown council was now making an additional Application to the Judge wherein the Crown would be attempting to restrict Mr. Christie from divulging the contents of the Disclosure to his client, me!

Why you might reasonably ask? Allow me to explain. When the formal charge was handed down on November 5th, 2012 the Zionist controlled media in Canada were on it like a dog on a bone and all the major print media and Canada’s largest TV media, SunNews Network, were spreading their excremental slurs and the usual vilifying statements about me and my website around the country. In the case of the National Post aka the Zionist National Post as I prefer to call it, their intrepid reporter Stewart Bell had published some quotes from a document which another website, FreeDominion.ca had published on a thread on their forum. The quotes in question were extracts taken from what is called a “Warned Statement”. Allow me to explain what that is.

Prior to Det – Cst Terry Wilson of the BC HATE CRIME TEAM (the Zionist created police hit squad that orchestrated my arrest and that also works in tandem with Agents X and Y of B’nai Brith Canada – the two Zionist B’nai Brith agents who filed the sec. 319(2) charge against me) releasing me from jail on May 16, 2012 he and I went to a small interview room where he “interviewed” me in order to solicit further “evidence” to be used against me. I ought to have listened to my lawyer and told Wilson to stuff his interview up where the sun doesn’t shine but of course I didn’t and decided to humour him and gave him some facts to counter all the bullshit that he was spewing forth during our talk; bs that was pure Zionist disinformation most likely planted in Wilson’s lightning struck brain by Agent Y after decades of conspired with him back in Ontario (more on that in a subsequent post).

Anyhow, Wilson went back to his office in Surrey with his digital recording device in hand and proceeded over the next couple of months to transcribe it into text. Eventually (this is still not clear yet) he disclosed it to my lawyer Mr. Christie who, in turn, sent me a copy and unbeknownst to myself I didn’t realize that the document was confidential. Given that Crown Council has yet to disclose anything else it begs the question as to why Wilson would have given this document to Mr. Christie in the first place. After I read it through I sent it to the owner of the FreeDominion.ca website Connie Fournier in a private email to discuss some relevant issues to do with Det. Wilson in order to help me in my defence against these trumped up charges. My reason for doing this was quite simple. Agent Y has been filing charges against Connie and Mark Fournier for a number of years now and dragging them through court appearance after court appearance in order to stop them from publishing information related to his outrageous behaviour with respect to in the ongoing battle over the infamous sec. 13(1) provision in the Canadian Human Rights Act  that’s been taking place on the web for a number of years now. Agent Y is Canada’s #1 serial complainer working for B’nai Brith Canada and any other Jewish lobby group in the country always ready and willing to charge critics of Israel with “hate crime” offences and tie them up in endless litigation and then having obtained a conviction he reaps the financial rewards that come with the victim having to pay outrageous fines. Being a lawyer himself and having worked for the Canadian Human Rights Commission for a number of years Agent Y’s reputation for infiltrating websites and forums using false aliases in order to post “hateful” and “racist” comments and then turning around and charging the website owner with a sec. 13(1) “hate crime” complaint are well documented and known internationally.  It’s all part of an ongoing program initiated by B’nai Brith International to censor the Internet via the creation and implantation of “hate crime” legislation in the law books of unsuspecting democracies.

Well, as it turns out our sleuth Det Wilson has been collaborating with this same serial sidewinder Agent Y for years now pulling off on others precisely what they pulled off in my case, that is, coming up with some phoney “evidence” furnished to them by B’nai Brith Canada via Agent X their BC sayanim agent and then arresting the person and stealing their computers and copying all the information off of their hard drive and subsequently using the Canadian court system and the Zionist controlled media to first vilify the person and afterwards strive to find them guilty in the “human rights” tribunals (modelled on the Stalinist show trials of the 1930’s) of “spreading ‘hatred’ toward Jews and citizens of Israel”. Once those steps have been taken they then proceed to fine the shit out of their victim and order them to take down their websites and also issue cease and desist orders preventing the victim from publishing any further truth about B’nai Brith’s sinister actions. Agent Y of course greedily collects his blood money, pockets it and then proceeds to look for another website to sucker in to his hate crime scam. This has been the modus operandi of the Jewish lobby groups here in Canada for decades and began as soon as they were able to surreptitiously configure their “hate crime” legislation into Canada’s statutes via their sayanim Jewish Supreme Court Justices (Irwin Cotler being the primary Zionist agent and former Liberal Attorney General of Canada) and all the rest of their pro-Zionist lawyers and sycophants working on “commissions” and behind the scenes.

Anyhow, getting back to the scene of the crime de jure and what happened as a result of Connie Fournier (also unaware of its confidential status) posting this document on her website in the form of a pdf. Crown council Jennifer Johnston is now attempting to use that as an argument against my lawyer and an excuse for her holding back on sending Mr. Christie the long awaited disclosure and second, to file an additional Application to stop Mr. Christie from sharing any additional information regarding the Crown’s charges with me, the accused.

Then, to add insult to injury, she held up documents before the Judge saying that she did have the necessary information sitting on her computer just waiting (at the click of a button as she remarked) to send to Mr. Christie but of course she had to have the new Application approved beforehand so she could sleep at night knowing that Mr. Topham wouldn’t be privy to it and go and post it on someone’s website!

Some of course might think it lame and some lame-brained on her part to expect that Mr. Christie be subjected to such an outrageous set of conditions given the fact that the Crown itself hasn’t disclosed a damn bit of information from the get go! But given all the antics on the part of CC Johnston thus far in this little mini-series nothing that she attempts comes as too great a surprise. Mr. Christie of course outright rejected Crown’s claims and also argued that there were mitigating circumstances regarding the “Warned Statement” that needed to be addressed when he could be in court in person.

Mr. Christie then asked the Judge to set another date for these matters to argued as obviously Crown was making it supremely difficult for him to do anything without first receiving disclosure.

Then something occurred which bears mentioning as it’s not the first time that Crown council Johnston has pulled this stunt. When she began stating to the Judge that the Crown needed to get additional bail conditions imposed on me asap she held up in her hand a booklet that Wilson had prepared of all the posts I had placed on my website since November 2, 2012 when I first learned that I was able to do so legally. I gather it is one of his prime sources of entertainment and a justification for his otherwise unearned pay cheque when he’s not busy snooping about in all my private emails that he stole from me back in May. One could see that to her way of thinking she had in hand all the solid evidence needed to prove that I was continuing to publish “willful hatred” toward Jews and Zionists and that because of all these posts (up to at least November 30) it was imperative that I be restricted from using my website and posting my articles, news reports, other articles, political cartoons and unrelated stories.

This business of trying to misinform the Judge while at the same time intimidate me into somehow feeling guilty for doing what I’ve been doing for the past fourteen years of publishing is as pathetic as it is laughable. She still hasn’t twigged on the fact that I run an alternative News Service and that posting articles is what one does when providing such a venue for readers. It’s as if I’m supposed to hang my head in shame because these Zionist psychopaths have alleged that I’m a hate mongering anti-Semite and tuck my tail between my legs and slink off into the underbrush somewhere to await my conviction! My God! Is that the degree of intelligence that our legal beagles are functioning at? If so, heaven help the nation.

It was then that Judge Morgan began to repeat early statements and false accusations by Crown council Johnston (in her zeal to convince the Judge of the dastardly deeds I supposedly was committing), that what I was writing and publishing might be comparable to a website that was publishing child pornography and therefore had to be stopped as soon as possible. Child pornography!!! I couldn’t at that point help but groan and Mr. Christie was quick to rebut such statements stating to Judge Morgan that this was an unfair and inapplicable comparison. (Again, I will address this issue further in a separate article). The Judge listened to Mr. Christie’s argument and tended to agree although Crown council Johnston must have got a chuckle out of having influenced him to the point where he was beginning to regurgitate the same standard Zionist double-talk and lies that CC Johnston was attempting to use.

Given all the disjointed and conflicting accusations and misinformation that were colliding in the court room Judge Morgan suggested that court adjourn for half an hour so that Crown and Defence could speak privately and try to come to some agreement over the contentious issues at hand and also so Mr. Christie could speak with me as well. This was around 2:30 p.m.  We took a half hour break and returned to the court room at 3:00 p.m.

There was no possibility of Mr. Christie agreeing to anything that Crown council Johnston was proposing and so when court resumed Mr. Christie and Crown council Johnston along with Judge Morgan began to look at future dates where Mr. Christie could be in court to argue the case. A date of Wednesday, December 19, 2012 at 1:30 p.m. was agreed upon by all parties and Judge Morgan then ended the session.

Stay tuned folks! It can only get more interesting as this 2012 freedom of speech farce continues to unfold.

—–

NOTE: Again I would ask of readers that they try to assist me financially in my battle with the censors by sending donations to the cause. Due to the fact that the Crown is refusing to give the required disclosure to my lawyer I am not able to furnish legal aid with the required documents that they demand before looking at whether or not I might qualify for legal financial assistance. This leaves me in the unenviable position of having to rely solely upon donations to pay for my legal expenses and while I have been receiving some assistance from a few kind souls who realize the importance of this case to all Canadians the amount of money thus sent comes nowhere near that necessary to pay for my lawyer to appear in court in Quesnel to defend me against these false charges.

As such I would once again implore readers to give serious consideration to helping me out by either sending a donation via PayPal using either a PayPal account or a credit card or else sending a cheque or Money Order to me via snail mail at the following postal address. Cash of course also works.

Arthur Topham
4633 Barkerville Highway
Quesnel, B.C.
Canada
V2J 6T8

To access my PayPal button please go to either the Home Page at http://www.radicalpress.com or my blog http://www.quesnelcariboosentinel.com The PayPal button is up on the right hand corner of the Home Page on either site.

Sincerely,

Arthur Topham
Pub/Ed
The Radical Press

 

Spingola/ZionCrimeFactory Interview: Discussions on ZFC’s New Book, Zionism & Arthur Topham

Photobucket

 

Photobucket

 

Click HERE to listen to Interview

[Editor’s Note: On behalf of RadicalPress.com I would like to take this opportunity to express my most sincere thanks to both Deanna Spingola and her Guest Zander C. Fuerza of ZionistCrimeFactory.com for adding my legal case with B’nai Brith Canada to their discussions on the Jewish Supremacist agenda for global destruction and world slavery.

Zander is an erudite speaker and dedicated researcher who is in the final stages of completing a book dealing with the very issues discussed in this interesting interview.

The fact that he has dedicated so much of the discussion to my battle with the Jewish lobbyists and their censorship plans for Canada is a genuine indication that the issue of  Freedom of Speech on the Internet is one that spans borders and is as vital a concern to citizens of the USA as well as Canada.

Please pass this interview on to other concerned citizens everywhere.]

———-

Hello,

I interviewed Zander C. Fuerza (ZCF) today, December 6, 2012. You may hear this interview by visiting this web site:

http://www.spingola.com/SpingolaSpecials.html

Thanks for your interest in my programs.

Kindest Regards,

Deanna

My radio program: Monday-Friday, 11 am to 1 pm (CT)

www.republicbroadcasting.org

My radio schedule: http://www.spingola.com/radio_schedule.html

Spingola Specials – commercial-free interviews

 My Books:

The Ruling Elite, a Study in Imperialism, Genocide and Emancipation 

The Ruling Elite, the Zionist Seizure of World Power 

(both available at Amazon, www.spingola.com and other retailers)

RadicalPress Legal Update #5

NewLegalUpdateLogo 700

notice4RP

Dear Free Speech Supporters,

On Tuesday, November 27, 2012 my wife and I once again wended our way into Quesnel to attend what I thought was to be a meeting with a Justice of the Peace who was going to speak with my lawyer Douglas Christie via telephone at 1:30 pm and arrange dates for an arraignment and a preliminary hearing regarding the sec. 319(2) criminal charge of “Willful promotion of hatred against an identifiable group, people of the Jewish religion or ethnic origin” brought against me by B’nai Brith Canada via their two agents X and Y. That was what the JP stated during the previous meeting held on November 20, 2012.

Just prior to 1:30 pm the Justice came and told us that the meeting would be held in Judge’s Court instead at the same time.

When I was called up before the Honourable Judge Morgan the court clerk called Mr. Christie on the phone and upon answering Judge Morgan began to discuss the dates for the two issue and it was agreed upon that the arraignment would take place on April 2, 2013 at 1:30 pm and that preliminary inquiry would be set for the week of June 3 – 6, 2013.

Initially my lawyer had requested five days for the preliminary inquiry but for some reason unbeknownst to anyone present it was set for only four. Mr. Christie stated that he didn’t feel four days might be enough and given the fact that he was still awaiting disclosure from Crown Council Johnston of the relevant documents supporting the Crown’s reasons for the charge after a delay of over six months he felt that it was unreasonable to expect him to be able to ascertain the amount of time that might be required. That said the Judge still left it at four days.

Then the issue of the application to address bail conditions came up again. Crown council Jennifer Johnston told the Judge in no uncertain terms that the Crown was going to be pressing to have all of the original bail conditions reinstated when the bail hearing took place citing the “fact” that Det. Wilson had informed her that I was still posting articles on my website that Wilson deemed to be of the same calibre as those complained of by Agents X and Y.

The previous undertaking given to a judge which I am presently bound by came into effect on October 13, 2012 and did not include the following two conditions which were originally given to me by Det-Cst Terry Wilson back on May 16, 2012 when I was released from the Quesnel jail. At the time of my release I did not sign the document but that didn’t matter to the Crown who insist that it still is in effect.

These two conditions (and possibly more planned) are:

1. “You shall not post any information on any internet website that can be read by members of the general public.”

2. “You shall not operate, post to or manage or allow anyone to operate, post to or manage any internet site owned by you that can be accessed by the general public.”

It must of course be recognized that both of these Orwellian ultimatums fly in the face of my Charter of Rights and Freedoms as guaranteed by Canada’s so-called “Constitution.” This fact also appears not to have entered into the mind of Crown Council Jennifer Johnston.

Mr. Christie’s response to all this was that he finds it extremely difficult for him to argue against the Crown’s position when he is still waiting for the disclosure of the documents that would indicate the reasons why the Crown was taking such a hard line approach in defiance of my constitutional rights.

This of course brought up the subject of said disclosure materials which Crown Council had assured both Judge Morgan and Counsel Christie that she would be supplying Mr. Christie with when we last attended court on the 20th of November. That information, apparently on cd discs, never arrived at Mr. Christie’s office prior to November 27th.

Judge Morgan asked the Crown what the problem was stating that he thought the Crown had had sufficient time to get this matter together.

Crown Council Johnston then gave the Judge a swan song about how she really, really wanted to get it done but that she was just so busy and then launched into all the things that she had on her plate that prevented her from accomplishing what she had said she would do last time we met in court. She then added that the material on the cd’s had to be “vetted” prior to sending them to Mr. Christie and that there were so many pages that had to be gone over and examined and it was soooo important that the accused not be privy to these documents before they were vetted and so on and so forth.

When it came time for setting a date for the next bail application to be heard there was no agreement between either Crown Council or Mr. Christie as to when they would be able to meet and so Judge Morgan decided that he would set a date and that both parties would have to make sure they were in attendance. At this point Judge Morgan also told Mr. Christie that this would likely be the last time he would be permitted to attend via telephone and that after that he would need to appear in person. The date was then set for Thursday, December 13, 2012 at 1:30 pm and the allotted time for Mr. Christie to argue against the Crown’s proposed conditions would be 45 minutes.

That said Mr. Christie then asked the Judge if he would ensure that the Crown furnish him with all the documentation required so that he would have time to prepare his arguments and Crown Council immediately said that she would get the information to Mr. Christie well in advance of the 13th of December. Judge Morgan then stated that Crown would have to furnish Mr. Christie with the information by no later than December 11, 2012. Hardly sufficient time in which to prepare a proper argument especially in light of the fact that Crown most likely was going to argue that all of my posts on RadicalPress.com since November 2nd, 2012 were indicative of more “hatred” being published against the ‘victims’ of this alleged “hate” crime.

That ended the session.

Some final comments:

It has been over six months now since Det-Cst Terry Wilson and his “BC HATE CRIME TEAM” swooped down upon my wife and I while we were travelling up to Prince George, B.C. in order to arrest me on this bogus charge, outraging me and traumatizing my dear wife. All the drama and hoopla surrounding Hate Hunter Wilson’s premeditated assault upon my constitutional right to freedom of speech on the Internet was simply that – a staged performance designed to lend some form of legitimacy and authenticity to what was simply an attack by the state upon an otherwise law-abiding citizen; one who has been openly informing the public about the very foreign agents who were responsible for making the complaint to the RCMP that precipitated this subsequent ambush on my legal and human right to freedom of speech and freedom of expression.

Yet, for all the hullabaloo and the gravity of this said “hate crime” – one based solely upon the contents of my website RadicalPress.com – the Crown still refuses to supply my defence lawyer Douglas Christie with the required disclosure documents that they apparently used to determine that such a charge was justified.

Instead, they used this bogus allegation to justify obtaining an illegal search warrant which was then used to invade my home and steal all of my computers and electronic files. And, in addition to that, they also stole my firearms (my only means of personal safety in the rural area where I live) and then had the audacity to add a further bogus charge of “unlawful storage of firearms” to the initial false charge. All this was of course done in order to furnish their controlled media with yet another juicy bit of misinformation that could then be used to smear and slander my person and give the impression that I was not only a vile hate-mongerer but also armed and dangerous!

The whole gist of this massive scam is to cover up the fact that the Jewish lobbies here in Canada have the judiciary and the RCMP and the media by the balls and whenever they wish to silence someone who is revealing this fact to the people of Canada all they have to do is put the squeeze on RCMP Hate Hunters like Det-Cst Wilson and Levas and the legal system suddenly kicks in to carry out the bidding of their task masters the Zionist lobby acting at the behest of its controlling arm B’nai Brith International. The perps in this charade then sit back and let the taxpayers of Canada pay all the expenses while I, a senior citizen on a very limited, fixed income, am forced to defend myself against this specious, anti-Charter of Rights charge.

Must be nice to have that sort of influence upon a nation that purports to be “free and democratic.”

One final note regarding my website.

Suspended

Readers were informed that my website host Netfirms.com has issued a decree at the behest of a complaint from Hate Hunter Wilson that my website would be “terminated” in 48 hours unless I removed all the supposed “hate” content alleged by Wilson to be on the site.

Upon receiving said notification I replied to the Corporate representative for Netfirms.com, a person going by the name of “Zach P”, requesting further information as to what exactly I was expected to remove in order to meet Netfirms.com policy rules. I also requested of my readership that they write to Zach P and let him know that they did not agree with Hate Hunter Wilson’s assessment of my website and that Netfirms.com ought to leave it alone. All of these efforts of course proved to be futile. Zach P never had the decency to even respond to anyone, a clear indication that he and his company Netfirms.com could give a shit about what Canadians think and feel about the issue of freedom of speech on the Internet.

Realizing that I had but 48 hours to save my site I had it moved to a different server and now it is still alive and functioning but for how long is anyone’s guess.

The fact that Hate Hunter Wilson has been sleuthing about behind the scenes doing his damnedest to destroy my website speaks volumes in terms of the underhanded tactics that these supposed ” ‘Royal Canadian’ peace officers” will resort to in order to due the bidding of their foreign controllers. My lawyer tells me that even though Hate Hunter Wilson’s tactics are unethical and immoral and deplorable they still are not illegal and so there’s nothing that I can do about it. I’ll leave readers to judge whether or not H.H. Wilson’s actions ought to be allowed.

And  so it goes as the wheels of justice here in Canuckistan slowly grind away and erode my rights and freedoms along with yours.

Again I would ask of readers that they assist me financially in my battle with the censors by sending donations to the cause. Due to the fact that the Crown is refusing to give the required disclosure to my lawyer I am not able to furnish legal aid with the required documents that they demand before looking at whether or not I might qualify for legal financial assistance. This leaves me in the unenviable position of having to rely solely upon donations to pay for my legal expenses and while I have been receiving some assistance from a few kind souls who realize the importance of this case to all Canadians the amount of money thus sent comes nowhere near that necessary to pay for my lawyer to appear in court in Quesnel to defend me against these false charges.

As such I would once again implore readers to give serious consideration to helping me out by either sending a donation via PayPal using either a PayPal account or a credit card or else sending a cheque or Money Order to me via snail mail at the following postal address. Cash of course also works.

Arthur Topham
4633 Barkerville Highway
Quesnel, B.C.
Canada
V2J 6T8

To access my PayPal button please go to my blog http://www.quesnelcariboosentinel.com The button is up on the right hand corner of the Home Page.

Thanks for all the support from those good folks who had the courage of their convictions to write a letter to Netfirms.com on my behalf. While these excellent letters may have had no effect upon the corporate heads at Netfirms.com they certainly provide a strong and positive endorsement for both myself and RadicalPress.com and for that reason alone they are gratefully received and acknowledged.

For Peace and Love and Truth and Justice for All,

I remain,

Sincerely,

Arthur Topham
Pub/Ed
RadicalPress.com
“Digging to the root of the issues since 1998”

Traitors in our Midst by Arthur Topham

BBTRAITORS

Traitors in our Midst

by Arthur Topham
Publisher
RadicalPress.com

November 22, 2012

“Thoughts are free and are subject to no rule. On them rests the freedom of man and they tower above the light of nature.

~ Paracelsus, Selected Writings

When I learned yesterday that the cop who was instrumental in spying on my website RadicalPress.com for over a year on behalf of the Zionist Jew lobbyist group B’nai Brith Canada had sent a letter of complaint to my web hosting company Netfirms.com whining and crying that I have been charged with a section 319(2) Criminal Code “Hate Crime” offence that he felt might “contravene” Netfirms.com’s policy (specifically section 4(b)(i)), I was not only disgusted beyond belief but angered that the RCMP would stoop so low in order to do the bidding of these foreign interest groups who set themselves up in Canada behind their phoney false masks of respectability only to then proceed to work behind  the scenes to undermine the democratic freedoms and rights that so many of our fore bearers fought and died to achieve.

Knowing full well that this case is now before the Supreme Court of Canada and that the contents on my website are a vital component of my defence in this trumped up charge, Det-Cst Terry Wilson still couldn’t resist his ongoing urge to do whatever possible in the dark to try and destroy not only years of my work but to also destroy evidence that he knows damn well will make the Crown’s attempt to find me guilty of this spurious charge virtually impossible to accomplish.

Now I could understand the two complainants in this case, both Zionist agents for B’nai Brith Canada who laid the complaint against me initially, pulling off a stunt like this. As a matter of fact the whole sordid, pathetic affair first began on Valentine’s Day, Feb. 14, 2007 when I received my first hate letter from a “Brian Esker” who later turned out to none other than an agent of B’nai Brith Canada masking himself in digital drag so he could safely threaten me and my website.

This foreign agent pulled this precise same thing back in 2007 prior to laying a formal complaint against me and my website using Section 13(1) of the Canadian Human Rights Act in order to accuse me of promoting, “ongoing hatred affecting persons identifiable as Jews and/or as citizens of Israel.”

At that time I had a web hosting server by the name of Alentus.com. This agent of B’nai Brith, who  screams bloody murder that he had nothing at all to do with it, sent what appears to be the exact same complaint to the server and bingo! they too gave me 48 hours to find another server or else my website would be liquidated like some counter-revolutionary Zak imprisoned in the wastelands of the Soviet gulag during the 1930s.

I had no time to get help and all of my letters to Alentus might as well have been addressed to Atlantis because they obviously didn’t reach anyone of intelligence and as a result I lost my former RadicalPress forum and an abundance of historic, priceless data when a last ditch attempt was made to salvage the site.

This second attempt on B’nai Brith’s part to destroy RadicalPress.com obviously was planned to include a Gentile dupe so that they could cover up their bloody tracks and what better dupe than the duplicitous Detective Terry Wilson, a self-serving, slithering snake in the grass who sold his soul to the Zionist devil decades ago and has since been serving Zion in their relentless quest to gain absolute control over the one means of free expression still left on this planet – the Internet.

So I immediately replied to “Zach P” the “Corporate Support” goof who sent out the Ultimatum. I asked him to let me know what content it was that I was being asked to “remove” within 48 hours. I then wrote back two more times as Zach P had ended his threatening letter with the statement, “Should you have further questions, please contact us.” Yah sure Zach.

I then sent out an APB release asking supporters to write to Zach P and tell him that RadicalPress.com wasn’t a “hate propaganda” site and that they wanted it left up. Letters are still coming in that were sent to Netfirms.com.

This morning I spoke to a webmaster friend of mine who thought the email address for Netfirms.com looked a bit weird and so I phoned their office in Toronto and spoke to a support representative. He did his best to figure out what was going on and did confirm that the email address wasn’t a scam but eventually he had to transfer me over to a supervisor located in Arizona.

I spoke to this woman for quite some time trying to reason with her on a number of things but all to no avail. She would say, “Well, if you would just remove any content ‘that is alleged to be untrue, offensive, slanderous, harassing or controversial in nature’ then there shouldn’t be a problem.” In turn I would reply, “Well, madam, if I KNEW what content that Det Wilson was referring to then I might possibly be able to remove it.”

And she went on to say that it was most unfortunate that all the Corporate people were away on holidays today and I would reply, “Oh I’m certain that Zach P was fully aware when he sent me this 48 hour email that he wouldn’t be returning to his office until the last minute.” And she would repeat…..the same old line all over.

Finally she advised me to just “park” the site before the 48 hours were up or else there was a good chance that Netfirms.com would delete it and everything would be lost. Parking it of course would mean that no one would then be able to access it.

I tried in vain to tell her that the website was the subject of a Supreme Court case here in Canada and that it was impossibly for me to remove any content or else I could face additional criminal charges. That wasn’t a concern for  her. I added that Netfirms.com itself could possibly face litigation for destroying evidence if they deleted my site. Then she would begin again with the “…if you remove the content (she was always implying that I must know what the content is) before the 48 hours…..etc.”

Finally before hanging up she had the audacity to say that if and when I was found innocent of said allegations that  all I had to do was let Netfirms.com know and they would be “happy” to place the site online once again!

I told her quite frankly that no, that would never happen and that for the rest of my days I would do whatever I could to tell other Canadians what a phoney, hypocritical web hosting site Netfirms.com truly is and that it was just one more tool for censorship like all the other Zionist media.

NetfirmsCensors

But getting back to these traitors, Wilson and Levas. To think that this supreme sell-out has been working around the clock to destroy my site behind closed doors instead of allowing the courts to come a decision is one of the most low-down, nauseating moves anyone could make let alone someone who professes to be a “Peace Officer” and a protector of all that is honourable, Canadian, honest and decent.

No matter how one looks at it these two deluded, mind-controlled zio-zombies are TRAITORS to their country! They ought to be shipped off to Israel where their true sentiments and crooked, deceitful ways would be most appreciated. It’s high time we filled a boat load or two of these Zionist 5th columnists, along with the two complainants in this sec. 319(2) charge and all the rest of the traitorous executive of B’nai Brith Canada and sent them back to their “spiritual homeland” where they belong. Why they are here in Canada doing their utmost to destroy our way of life is something each and every Canadian should seriously begin to think about before we all lose our freedom to speak our minds.
————-

RadicalPress.com UPDATE

Dear Reader,

The site is currently undergoing changes due to Det. Terry Wilson having intimidated Netfirms.com into terminating my account. We are working on restoring all aspects of it but for now only text messages will appear. My apologies to all supporters of freedom of speech and Internet Freedom.

Sincerely,

Arthur Topham

Editor – RadicalPress.com

Please direct all inquiries to me at the following email address: editor@quesnelcariboosentinel.com

NEWS RELEASE FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE MARCH 27, 2009 DOUG CHRISTIE & CANADIAN FREE SPEECH LEAGUE STILL AWAITING WORD ON INTERVENOR STATUS IN RADICALPRESS.COM COMPLAINT CASE

hrcscartoon

NEWS  RELEASE
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE MARCH 27, 2009

DOUG CHRISTIE & CANADIAN FREE SPEECH LEAGUE STILL AWAITING WORD ON INTERVENOR STATUS IN RADICALPRESS.COM COMPLAINT CASE

 

Constitutional Challenge S13 Radical Press & Christie By Fourhorses

[Editor’s Note: Many thanks to Fourhorses for putting together this article and presenting some important questions.]

____________________________
http://www.freedominion.com.pa/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=113251
Constitutional Challenge S13 Radical Press & Christie

By fourhorses

February 23, 2009
In early February of this year, Arthur Topham of the Radical Press posted his verbal notification to Keren Jensen (CHRC) of his intent to launch a constitutional challenge to Section 13. http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=910

This is in regards to the complaint launched against Topham/Radical Press via co-complainants Harvey Smarba and B’nai Brith – Complaint No.: 20071016

Today, there is a posting that Canadian Free Speech lawyer, Doug Christie has applied as intervener:

In a letter to Registry Officer Nancy LaFontant and Tribunal member Karen Jensen of the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal in Ottawa, Ontario Mr. Christie stated:

Quote:

“I am general counsel of the Canadian Free Speech League, and as such I am interested in the case of Arthur Topham. I would like the opportunity to intervene on behalf of the free speech issues raised in this case. We were allowed intervention status in the case of Marc Lemire, and it is our desire to assist in the maintenance of a constitutional challenge to the enabling legislation, as well as to participate in the fact-finding that would be the foundation of such an assessment.”

source: http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=924

———->

Will the CHRC allow Christie to intervene on behalf of free speech ?

Will Karen [Jensen Tribunal member] and Jenny [Jennifer Lynch, the chief human-rights commissioner] meet their match with the likes of Doug ?

Will the CHRC disallow Christie because he is too good, doesn’t tolerate the BS and can run circles around them ?

What is the basis of the constitutional challenge to Section 13 that Topham/Radical Press is planning ?

Will the CHRC dismiss, out-of-hand, this challenge as they did with Melissa Guille’s constitutional challenge?

Will Jenny order the CHRC to redact all documentation and withhold it for several years as was done in the Lemire constitutional challenge ?

Will the Attorney General’s office intervene again and remind us that speech “chill” is OK and it depends upon who says it ?

Will B’nai Brith get double status as co-complainant and as intervener ?

Will the CHRC/CHRT extend the envelope of new jurisprudence , and again usurp the authority of the Supreme Court ?

… stay tuned to see if the kangaroos hop over our rights again.

_________________
Freedom really does not evolve, it revolts.  

Here Some Hate, There Some Hate, Everywhere Hate, Hate: Mock Tells Lemire Internet Hearing

From: cafe@canadafirst.net
Reply-To: paul@paulfromm.com
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007

Here Some Hate, There Some Hate, Everywhere Hate, Hate: Mock Tells Lemire Internet Hearing

MISSISSAUGA, February 20, 2007. The first two days of this second two weeks in the Marc Lemire Internet case opened with former League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Executive Director Karen Mock completing her examination in chief. Her testimony forms part of the case of the Canadian Human Rights Commission in responding to defendant (Respondent) Marc Lemire’s constitutional challenge to Sec. 13.1 of the Canadian Human Rights Act — the Internet censorship provision where truth is no defence.

Mock’s credentials were strongly challenged by Barbara Kulaszka Marc Lemire’s counsel and by Douglas H. Christie of Victoria, general counsel for the Canadian Free Speech League with, along with the Canadian Association for Free Expression, is intervening on Marc. Lemire’s behalf.

Barbara Kulaszka charged that Karen Mock’s report written for the Commission was just a “cut-and-paste” collection, much of it word for word, of other articles she has recycled. “How much were you paid for this report, Dr. Mock?” Miss Kulaszka asked.

Commission lawyer Giacomo Vigna objected to the release of information about the expenditure of taxpayers’ citing “privacy.” Taking note of the fact that she had been paid, Member Hadjis ruled that the exact amount was irrelevant.

Miss Kulaszka charged that Mock was a partisan and had spent most of her professional career in the anti-racism industry. The defence further charged that most the studies she cited in her report and her own work was not in the area of her alleged field of expertise; namely, the effects of so-called Internet “hate speech” on victims or the general public. “What is the effect of the Internet, a very dynamic and creative medium? Dr. Mock has no evidence that if someone sees a strong statement on the Internet, he will experience a loss of self esteem. If he feels bad, is it because he saw the term, let’s say, ‘dirty Polack’ or because he had a bad lunch?”

“Have you done a cause and effect study of strong language on the Internet?’ Mr. Christie asked.

“No I have not,” Mock admitted. “My opinions are based on my extensive studies.”

In her years at B’nai Brith where she was overall editor of the annual Audit of Anti-Semitic Incidents, she asserted that all facts were double checked. Miss Kulaszka confronted her with a reference to Paul Fromm in the 1994 Audit where it was alleged that he had been charged for his anti-Semitism, holocaust denial and conspiracy theories. None of this was true, Miss Kulaszka reminded her. Mr. Fromm sued Mock and B;’nai Brith and in a settlement the comments were subsequently retracted.

Dr. Mock explained the lapse thus: ‘It was just part of an introduction, a throwaway overview,” she said excusing the egregious lies, as Mr. Fromm has never been charged with anything. “We try to present material objectively in an effort to isolate, ignore and expose racists. We’re not expressing hateful feelings toward racists,” she insisted.

Mr. Christie noted the complete lack of definition of the word “hate” with which Mock peppers her [presentation and frequent denunciations of almost all activity on the right of the political spectrum. “Your criteria for defining crime is entirely subjective,” Mr. Christie noted.

Going over her anti-racist credentials,. Mock had noted that she chaired a committee that wrote a position paper for the Canadian Government prior to a big anti-racism conference in Durban in 2001. She was then given a four year appointment to the Canadian Race Foundation. “I was appointed by Hedy Fry Minister of Multicultruralism in October, 2001,” Mock explained.

“Is that the Hedy Fry who had to apologize for saying there were Ku Klux Klan crosses burning in Prince George?” Mr. Christie asked.

In the middle of Mr. Christie’s examination of Dr. Mock on her credentials, Member Hadjis abruptly intervened and qualified her.

For the fifth day in a row Complainant Ricardo Warmouse absented himself from the hearings. CAFE’s Paul Fromm has repeatedly objected to Warmouse’s absence. “This goes to show that this complaint is frivolous and vexatious,” Fromm told the Tribunal. “Warmouse takes a few minutes, fills out a complaint form/ His old pals at the Commission process it and send it to a Tribunal. Respondent Marc Lemire spends months and many thousands of dollars preparing for this case. He retains a lawyer at considerable cost. He takes a month off work. Warmouse is paid by the Commission to travel to Toronto, gives his evidence and leaves.

This is outrageous,” Mr. Fromm argued. “It shows how this law can be abused. Warmouse practises and boasts of a strategy of ‘maximum disruption’ against his political opponents. He uses this complaint system. Even if Mr. Lemire wins, the best he can hope for is the status quo and to be out a great deal of time, suffering and money. Even if he loses, Warmouse cannot be assessed expenses or costs.”

Mr. Fromm urged Tribunal Member (judge) Athanasios Hadjis to compel Warmouse’s attendance, citing a directive given by Member Sinclair against complainant Mark Schnell in the Schell v. John Micka case in Vancouver in 2001.

While claiming not to speak on his behalf, Commission lawyer Giacomo Vigna complained that Mr. Fromm was “disturbing Mr. Warmouse for useless purposes.”

Member Hadjis said: “I’m upset by the fact that I was misled. We went to a lot of trouble to find Toronto-area locations for Mr. Warmouse’s benefit. He made quite a point of wanting a location near public transportation and downtown Toronto. Now, he’s not here.”

Monday, Mr. Vigna was directed to contact Mr. Warmouse about his absence.

After the noon break Tuesday, Mr.. Vigna reported back that Mr. Warmouse was preparing for next week’s libel case against Paul Fromm and CAFE alleging that Mr. Fromm’s efforts to have him ordered to appear was a “conspiracy” to keep him from such preparations. He further said that his attendance or non-attendance would be on a day-to-day basis and that the Tribunal could contact him by letter.

A clearly displeased Athanasios Hadjis commented: “I have no power to order Mr. Warmouse to attend, but I can echo my colleague Mr. Sinclair and say that he should be here.”
______________________________________

Join the Marc Lemire Defence Team
Support Marc Lemire’s Constitutional Challenge

Be part of our team and contribute what you can to defeat this horrible law
and protect Freedom of Speech in Canada !

Via Mail: Send Cheque or Money Order to:

Canadian Association for Free Expression,
P.O. Box 332,
Rexdale, ON
M9W 5L3
Canada
—–
Visit the Canadian Association for Free Expression’s website:

http://www.canadianfreespeech.com

Please support CAFE in our efforts:
CAFÉ, Box 332, Rexdale, ON., M9W 5L3, Canada or e-mail us your VISA number and expiry date.

“My Gift to Canada:” Prof. Persinger Demolishes “Hate Law”Foundation

From: cafe@canadafirst.net
To: paul @paulfromm.com

Friday, 23 Feb 2007

“My Gift to Canada:” Prof. Persinger Demolishes “Hate Law”Foundation

Mississauga. February 22, 2007. Lawyers for the Canadian Government and the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith sat in ashen silence as Laurentian University Psychology professor Michael Persinger tore to shreds 40-year old studies used to justify Canada’s “anti-hate” legislation in a Canadian Human Rights Tribunal held here today.

Self-appointed internet censor Ricardo Warmouse’s victim, Freedomsite webmaster Marc Lemire, is fighting back against Canada’s Internet censorship law and is challenging the constitutionality of this restrictive legislation. Section 13.1 of the Canadian Human Rights Act, when it was upheld in a milder form in 1990, was deemed an acceptable limitation of free speech because of a theory of minority vulnerability to “hate speech”, going back to the Cohen Report on Hate Propaganda of 1965. This theory held that “hate propaganda” so upset minorities that they became fearful and unable to participate equally in society

“The assertion by the Cohen Committee that ‘individuals subjected to racial or religious hatred may suffer substantial psychological stress, the damaging consequences including a loss of self-esteem, feelings of anger, and outrage’ is confounded by archaic concepts of psychological processes. There is no direct experimental evidence that listening to verbal behaviour that directly or indirectly identifies the experience diminishes to any significant extent the self-esteem of a person. The effect sizes of the differences between ‘verbal settings’ are too small to be considered singularly causative. The term self-esteem is a hypothetical construct that, like phlogiston was to alchemy, has limited validity only within a specific model of human behaviour. Unfortunately the construct of “self esteem” has now been reified,” Dr. Persinger’s report noted.

Marc Lemire’s defence team was unable to offer Dr. Persinger a hefty fee like the one former B”nai Brith operative, Dr. Karen Mock, collected from the taxpayer-funded Canadian Human Rights Commission for a cut-and-paste job of some old writing she did. The defence did offer travel expenses and accommodations to Dr. Persinger. In turning down all compensation, Dr. Persinger said: “My report is my gift of freedom for Canada.” He said that he was forever grateful to Canada for allowing him to immigrate and escape the draft in what he believes was a “genocidal” war in Vietnam. “I’m alive today because Canada took me in,” he explained.

Doug Christie

Later Thursday night, Douglas H. Christie, general counsel for the Canadian Free Speech League, addressed a meeting of the Alternative Forum.

“Freedom is very quietly being taken away,” he told a packed audience in Toronto. “One of the things I’ve been very proud of in my life are the heroic people I’ve met — people like Marc Lemire and Paul Fromm who have the unenviable task of holding back the powers of repression.”

Referring to Sec. 13.1 of the Canadian Human Rights Act, the Battling Barrister said: “Freedom is being taken away by government and truth is no defence.

Mr. Christie, a veteran of more than 30 years in the Courts of this land, hailed Dr. Persinger as “a magnificent witness — clear and forthright.”

“We don’t need laws to protect us from bad speech. It’s part of the human psyche to deal with bad speech,” he explained.

In an emotional address, prior to receiving a plaque of appreciation from Marc Lemire, Mr. Christie told how he’d been fired by the firm he was articling for just two days before completing his requirement for graduation. He’d spent six months unable to find another law firm that would accept him. Eventually, a lawyer accepted him and gave him a chance. Years later, he visited his benefactor who was dying of cancer. “How can I ever thank you,” Mr. Christie asked the dying man.

With choking breath, the old lawyer answered: “Pass it on.”

That is our challenge Mr. Christie told his audience. “Every new generation has to fight for freedom.

Hailing, Marc Lemire’s constitutional challenge, Mr. Christie said; “This is the first time in history someone is bringing a full appeal with psychological evidence refuting the victimology” that the courts have used to justify Canadian hate laws. “None of this would be possible with Marc Lemire’s courage, Paul Fromm’s leadership, Barbara Kulaszka’s careful work and the support of all of you.”

“Don’t ever underestimate the power of your presence,” he said appreciatively to the dozen or so people who have regularly attended Marc Lemire’s Internet Tribunal hearings.

Speaking of so many complacent Canadians, Mr. Christie said: “We legitimize corruption by apathy. We enter and leave the world at a time that is not of our choosing, but what we do while we are here is our choice,” he said quietly. Make that choice freedom.

The Tribunal hearings continue in Mississauga tomorrow and all of next week.
_________________________________________
Join the Marc Lemire Defence Team
Support Marc Lemire’s Constitutional Challenge

Be part of our team and contribute what you can to defeat this horrible law and protect Freedom of Speech in Canada !

Via Mail: Send Cheque or Money Order to:

Canadian Association for Free Expression,
P.O. Box 332,
Rexdale, ON
M9W 5L3
Canada

—–
Visit the Canadian Association for Free Expression’s website:

http://www.canadianfreespeech.com

Please support CAFE in our efforts:
CAFE
Box 332,
Rexdale,
ON., M9W 5L3

Canada or e-mail us your VISA number and expiry date.