Zionist Victory: John Graham loses out to corrupt Canadian court system

June 28, 2007 by

[Editor's Comment: While most people will dismiss the accusation it is my opinion that the Canadian court system is under full control of the Zionist Jews just as the U.S. system is and that is why whatever Canadian citizens do or attempt to do in order to obtain justice, falls upon deaf ears. It was a foregone conclusion that John would lose this appeal. If the Canadian justice system was in truth "Canadian" and independent and in possession of any integrity and courage and honesty it would have told the US government to fuck off the minute it tried to proceed with extradition hearings in John's case. Their evidence was fraught with discrepancies and outright lies and still the Canadian courts bent over and submitted to their unreasonable and obviously prejudiced reports and accusations. This can only happen when the two are controlled by the same hidden hand. That hand is the Zionist Jews who control the U.S. government and the judiciary. That is also why I refer to the legal system as the "Jewdiciary". Go figure!]
———-


————A TRAVESTY CONTINUES AS JOHN’S APPEAL IS DISMISSED————

A Travesty Continues as John’s Appeal is Dismissed

June 26, 2007

The BC Supreme Court in Vancouver dismissed the extradition appeal by John Graham today, demonstrating the Canadian government’s weak-kneed response to the United States.

Following the announcement by the panel of three judges, a wave of emotion went through the courtroom. John’s bail was revoked and he will remain incarcerated during the 30 day period in which an appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada may be submitted. However, given the three judges’ unanimous decision, the chances appear to be slim that such an appeal would be heard.

The impending extradition to South Dakota could take place shortly following the 30 day appeal period.

It is ironic that June 26 was also a turning point 32 years ago in 1975 when the shoot-out took place on Pine Ridge that ended in the deaths of three young men, FBI Agents Jack Coler and Ronald Williams and Native man Joe Stuntz. This tragic event eventually led to the murder of Anna Mae Aquash.

Our hearts ache for John and his family as preparations commence for the legal battle ahead. We remain confident that John’s informed testimony will surely turn an uncomfortable and illuminating light on the actions of the FBI and their COINTELPRO activities against Native American people and culture. This is a bloody tale of racism, oppression, systematic murder, and justice un-served.

We thank you most sincerely for your continuing and unwavering support in this dark hour, and will keep in touch as developments occur.

All our relations,
Matthew Lien and the John Graham Defense Committee
www.grahamdefense.org

Filed Under: B.C. Politics, B.C. Supreme Court, Editor's Zone, Indigenous Nations, John Graham Case, Law & Justice, Political Prisoners, Political Zionism

JUDGES TO ANNOUNCE DECISION IN JOHN GRAHAM CASE JUNE 26, 2007

June 23, 2007 by


————JUDGES TO ANNOUNCE DECISION JUNE 26, 2007————

Update from the John Graham Defense Committee
http://www.grahamdefense.org

The panel of three Judges that heard the appeal on May 27th will announce their decision on Tuesday, June 26th at 9:30 a.m. at the BC Supreme Court, 800 Smythe St., Vancouver, B.C.

John must arrive at the court by 9:00 a.m.

John’s family will holding a prayer circle Tuesday morning June 26th at 8:00 a.m. (in private) and ask that all supporters join in prayer in their own way, wherever they may be, at the same time.

All supporters able to be present in the court room to hear the decision are urged to attend.
———————-

Filed Under: Canadian "Just-Us" System, Canadian Politics, Editor's Zone, Indigenous Nations, John Graham Case, Law & Justice

B.C. judges reserve decision on Graham’s extradition

May 20, 2007 by

B.C. judges reserve decision on Graham’s extradition

Friday, May 18, 2007
CBC News http ://www.cbc.ca/news/credit.html

Three justices in the B.C. Court of Appeal reserved their decision Thursday on an extradition order for John Graham, a former Yukoner wanted in the United States in connection with the 1976 killing of Nova Scotia Mi’kmaq activist Anna Mae Pictou-Aquash.

Graham, who has been fighting to stay in Canada since 2003, appeared in a Vancouver court this week to appeal the extradition order that then-justice minister Vic Toews issued last year. It would send Graham to the U.S. to face a murder charge in South Dakota.

Graham remains free on bail while the justices make their decision.

Pictou-Aquash and Graham were members of the American Indian Movement. In 1976, Aquash’s body was found abandoned in a ravine at the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation in South Dakota. She had been shot in the back of the head.

Graham was arrested in connection with Pictou-Aquash’s murder in December 2003. In 2005, the B.C. Supreme Court decided Graham should be sent to the U.S. to face the charge, and in June 2006, Toews issued the extradition order.

The B.C. Court of Appeal’s public gallery was full with Graham’s supporters and interested onlookers during this week’s hearing. [Read more...]

Filed Under: Editor's Zone, First Nations of Turtle Island, John Graham Case, Law & Justice

Rex Weyler Responds to Accusations of Disruption RE: John Graham

April 6, 2007 by

[Editor's Note: I received the letter below written by Rex Weyler and sent to Aaron Mercredi from Helen Michel. It's obvious from the type of reaction that Mr. Weyler received to his questions regarding John Graham that Bob Robideau, a person supposedly in Vancouver to promote justice for Leonard Peltier, is in town for ulterior reasons. Please read and pass this article on to your lists.]
————————–

FROM:
helen michell4/4/07 telquaa@hotmail.com

Important article to pass along. Another divide and conquer tactic. This article shows who is a sellout and who is a real warrior for Mother Earth. Its so sad to see that the sell outs get more of the publics support, while many of us, true indigenous warriors get none.
———

Subject: Rex Weyler’s response to disruption.
Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2007

From: “Rex Weyler” weyler@telus.net
To: “Derrick O’Keefe” sankara83@hotmail.com ,”Aaron Mercredi” aaronmercredi@yahoo.ca
CC: “Native Youth” nymchapter604@hotmail.com

Subject: disruptions Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007

Aaron Mercredi:

I see you have accused me of disrupting your event on Friday, March 30, 2007, UBC.

As you witnessed, I rose to ask Mr. Bob Robideau a question after he publicly accused Tutchone citizen, Canadian citizen, and Vancouver resident John Graham with murdering fellow Canadian activist Anna Mae Pictou Aquash. The question I asked, which remains unanswered, is simple:

1. What evidence does Mr. Robideau possess that suggests Mr. Graham was involved with the death of Ms. Pictou Aquash?

As you also witnessed, Mr. Robideau offered no evidence, but rather, immediately insulted me personally. He called me a “white man” (true), a “pig” (a matter of opinion), and he accused me of “exploiting native people,” which would be a surprise to my indigenous friends and colleagues around the world.

In any case, these were insults, rather than an answer to a fair and important question. Mr. Robideau also issued a common street threat: “I’ll deal with you later,” which perhaps was intended to intimidate me from asking further questions.

Since this is a matter of freedom, perhaps life & death for John Graham, who has family, children, friends, and associates from three decades of work in Canada for human rights and other issues (mercury poisoning, uranium mining, etc.) you should be extremely careful in making unfounded accusations and in supporting those who do.

As you also witnessed, Mr. Robideau further suggested that he knows “the people” who ordered the death of Ms. Pictou Aquash. I rose again to ask Mr. Robideau two more questions:

2. Who are these people?

3. What evidence do you have that they ordered an execution?

Again, as you saw, Mr. Robideau refused to offer any evidence and again leveled insults: “white man”, “pig” and so forth, which seems to be his stock insult for someone who asks inconvenient questions.

Keep in mind, there is no evidence that AIM ever dealt with informers by “executing” them. It is unheard of. [Read more...]

Filed Under: B.C. Supreme Court, Canadian Politics, Editor's Zone, First Nations of Turtle Island, Indigenous Nations, John Graham Case, Law & Justice, Political Prisoners, U.S. Foreign/Domestic Policies