Click to watch: http://youtu.be/DhwW9JFEGkI
Please help this video go viral — there really isn’t much time left.
Title: What Does if Mean to be A Friend of Israel?
The message is simple: DON’T EVER VOTE FOR A FRIEND OF ISRAEL.
Please distribute this video as widely as possible. It is one of the few chances that the Un-chosen People have of fighting back.
But be careful who you ask for advice. If I were a Friend of Israel (perish the thought) I would try to infiltrate as many anti-Israel organisations that I could, including websites that purported to be pro-Palestinian.
Thank you, and take care,
The War Against Trevor (LaBonte)
Gilad Atzmon interviews Trevor Labonte
Monday, March 3, 2014
By Gilad Atzmon
Until two years ago, Trevor LaBonte was one of the most successful Jazz artists in Texas. He had been performing every night and in the most prestigious venues. He was the first-call guitar player for many of Austin’s prominent musicians. But then it all changed.
Gilad Atzmon: Trevor you were a local Jazz hero, what happened?
Trevor LaBonte: An activist named Craig Berlin, owner of Pro-Tape Staff in Austin, organized a campaign to destroy my career by terrorizing the entire Austin music community. He creates Facebook posts in which he tags 50 or 60 important people in town, and reports to them that I am a ‘Nazi,’ an ‘Anti-Semite,’ and a ‘holocaust denier.’ Berlin demands that everyone must do everything in their power to make sure I never play another note in public. At first, most people ignored him, but then others took up his cause, including the radio DJ Andy Langer from KGSR, helping to make sure I have become a hate figure and completely ostracized.
Gilad: Let me understand correctly, you didn’t publish a book or even an article, all that vile campaign against you was launched because you expressed some thoughts on your own Facebook page? Is it correct?
Trevor: Yes, that’s what happened.
Gilad: How have your friends reacted to this onslaught?
Trevor: They are confused and afraid, mostly. Many of them quietly agree with at least some of what I say, and they are still friends with me. But understandably, they are scared to be listed in a performance announcement with me, since they would be certain to draw the hissing and screeching and boycott of Craig Berlin’s fans. Most of my friends are sad and just want to play music together. Anyone who tries to stick up for me, or just moderate the witch hunt against me, risks being similarly attacked themselves. And the attacks are vile. Musicians are not used to being vilified for unusual opinions.
Gilad: I guess that it would be correct to argue that the entire Jazz community is strictly speaking terrorized by this Jewish campaign to ostracize you.
Trevor: Many of the musicians in Austin are Jewish and are among my friends. The campaign against me is being orchestrated by about 10 Jewish people who have publicly agreed amongst themselves that I have fallen ‘gravely mentally ill’, must be taken immediately to a ‘psychiatric institution’ and be ‘heavily dosed with meds.’
Gilad: This sounds familiar.
Trevor: One recommend that I be castrated by a chainsaw.
Gilad: This is clearly more radical treatment than the traditional rabbinical circumcision apparatus.
Trevor: There were many other violent threats and fantasies, which are an interesting and revealing response to my mission statement: I advocate universal human rights and opposition to supremacism, violence and corruption of all forms, Jewish, Christian or otherwise. I also believe in the free exchange of ideas and free speech.
Gilad: I have now met your beautiful and kind girlfriend and your lovely parents. I saw a lot of fear, it seems that everyone around you is subject to harassment by Berlin and his defamation troopers, I even learned from venue owners that they were harassed by Berlin and his clan. Have you ever spoke to Craig? Did you meet him?
Trevor: We have only communicated briefly on Facebook. He keeps me blocked now, so I can’t even see what he is saying about me, let alone defend myself. I have no choice except to just let him go crazy for the world to see. I hope this demonic ranting helps people to understand the rampant madness raging in such obsessed minds.
Gilad: I obviously looked at the accusations against you and they are indeed vile. You are quoted questioning on FB “If Hitler was an evil dictator, then why did he have broad public support? Why did Germany love him so much?” This is obviously a legitimate and valid question.
However when I visited your FB page I realized that you push it a bit further, you question the Holocaust official narrative. You ask “what about those ‘gas chambers?’ Where are they? Why were they never found?”
Trevor, do you realise that such questions are banned in European countries? Why do you think there is an attempt to stop Holocaust revisionism? Why are you chased, what are they afraid of?
Trevor: Yes, I realize Holocaust revisionism is banned in 17 countries. But America is not one of them. Americans need to use their right to free speech to question traditional history of all kinds. The Holocaust is no different in that respect.
Gilad: You have also suggested that Jews were highly involved with Bolshevism. Truth can be offensive, but why is this the case?
Trevor: In this case, the truth is offensive to Jews because, were it to become widely known, their whole narrative of history would have to change. The fact is that Bolshevism was largely a Jewish supported cause.
Gilad: I am not a supporter of Bolshevism nor am I a Marxist, but I would simply argue that Jews used their dominance within the Bolshevik movement in order to promote their ethnic interests. I would agree that Jewish Bolsheviks carried on an element of Judeo centric supremacist righteousness.
Trevor: I asked if Jews ran some of the camps of Gulag Archipelago because they harbored deep racial animosity toward the Russian people. I often like to phrase things as questions, and my intent is to get a historical and intellectual conversation started. Yes, they are pointed questions, and my goal is to lead to the conclusions I have reached. More importantly, I want people to question traditional versions of history. It’s a very painful process, for me as well as for others, I am sure. I was shocked and upset to learn that 85% of the Bolshevik/Communist government were actually Jewish, something I did not know because it is not taught in any history class. How can Hitler be seen as the greatest mass-murderer of all time, when practically next door, people like Trotksy/Leiba Bronstein, Lazar Kaganovich, and Gengrich Yagoda were running completely amok? The title of worst mass murderer has many competitors.
Gilad: What is the solution?
Trevor: I think the best solution would be to discard our “political correctness” standards. We should be able to question any historical or political narrative. That’s the first amendment and I think it was created to allow difficult discussions exactly like these. This is the only way we can start to approach the “truth” in history. No group, including Jewish people, should be allowed to control history. In the south, we have not controlled the history of the Civil War and I also think that’s a good thing.
Gilad: Thanks for your time Trevor. I would urge my readers and followers to contact Craig Berlin and to demand that he stop his hate campaign against you at once. I am pretty sure that the tide will change soon. I had an incredible time staying with you and playing music together. However, for the first time I met a musician who was more outspoken than myself. In fact, never before have I had trouble because of the views of one of my band members. This was pretty funny and a very positive development indeed.
Zionists and the West Are Driving the World Towards Armageddon
Zander C. Fuerza
The latest despicable drive for war with Syria is predicated on the now universally scoffed at propaganda story of a chemical attack allegedly launched by the Syrian government on its own civilians for some bewildering reason. The logic behind such a senseless attack that would only serve to benefit Assad’s enemies is so backwards, so nonsensical, that even most British parliamentarians — who, next to the Americans, normally have been the world’s most passionate and dedicated executioners of Zionist designs across the globe — dismissed it as hogwash, voting against military action against Syria. This rational decision by British officials has caused the Zionist tribalists and hasbara mouthpieces who own and operate the controlled media to erupt with uncontrollable fury.
It should come as no surprise that these bogus allegations and the trumped up “evidence” that the Western sock-puppets of Zionism have claimed proves Assad is responsible for the “chemical attack” originates directly from the Israeli Mossad, the world’s most sophisticated, far-reaching and dangerous terrorist organization in the world. The Israeli terror-lords were the first ones to point the finger of blame at Assad after the alleged chemical attack. Immediately pointing the finger of blame at your enemy is a tell-tale sign of a false-flag operation in action. It is the exact same strategy used by Israel on 9/11 when representatives of the Israeli government, namely Ehud Barak and Ariel Sharon, immediately went on television and blamed Al Qaeda for the attacks before anyone could have known who was responsible.
The same modus operandi of false-flag deception that was executed on 9/11 is now being used against Syria. Just prior to 9/11 Israeli intelligence officials delivered a vague, useless “warning” to the CIA in which they alleged that some two hundred Islamic terrorists were present on American soil and were preparing a major attack. The Israeli deceivers linked the plot to “Osama bin Laden” and told their CIA counterparts that there were “strong grounds for suspecting Iraqi involvement.” Immediately after 9/11 Israeli Likud Party officials and Mossad agents took every opportunity possible to insinuate that Al Qaeda and Iraq were responsible for 9/11 and the Anthrax attacks. As it turned out, Israel was behind both.
After the so-called chemical attack in Damascus, Israel quickly dispatched a team of Mossad agents to Washington to “advise” their American sock-puppets on how the Zionists would prefer America “responds” to this invented atrocity. The Times of Israel, a radical Zionist outlet, confirmed all of this when it reported: “… Israeli intelligence information is widely believed to have played a central role in enabling the US’s adamant conviction that Assad’s regime fired chemical weapons at civilians outside Damascus last Wednesday, killing hundreds of people and wounding over a thousand, according to Syrian rebel groups.” It goes on to report that a “large delegation of senior Israeli security officials is currently in Washington holding talks with top administration officials led by US National Security Adviser Susan Rice.” Yes, that’s right, you are being asked to take the word of Israeli intelligence agents that Assad is guilty and therefore must be “dealt with.” Either the Zionists behind this piddly propaganda ploy are incredibly stupid or they believe the entire world to be incredibly gullible.
How can anyone possibly believe a word these people say after they have been caught staging terrorist attacks left and right to blame on their enemies, and have been exposed for their “Weapons of Mass Destruction” big lie that initiated the genocidal war in Iraq? Israel and the United States use false-flag terrorism to scare their own populations into a submissive state and to justify their imperial ambitions. Two of Israel’s more well-known false flag attacks were the Lavon Affair (1954) and the USS Liberty attack (1967). The only reason we know about those two incidents is because the Israelis botched those operations pretty badly and were exposed. During the Lavon Affair operation in Egypt, one of the Jewish terrorists’ bombs exploded prematurely in his pocket. He was arrested and spilled the beans about the whole conspiracy. When the Israelis attacked the USS Liberty in 1967, they failed to sink the vessel and kill all those on board, and were thus unable to cover their tracks and set the propaganda narrative, as they have done with every major terror attack aimed at a Western target since that time.
In 1992 and 1994 terrorists bombed the Israeli embassy and a Jewish community center in Argentina. Zionist Jews immediately blamed these attacks on Iran and Hezbollah without a shred of evidence. The Argentine researcher Adrian Salbuchi has determined that it is much more likely that those attacks were actually the work of the Israeli Mossad themselves. That is why the Zionists went haywire when the Argentine government recently announced that it was establishing a new investigation into those bombings to find the true culprits. Annie Machon, a former MI5 officer, has theorized that Israel attacked its own embassy in London in 1994 and blamed it on Palestinians. I tend to believe her theory.
In 1982, the American and French marine barracks in Lebanon were attacked with a car bomb which killed nearly three hundred American and French soldiers. The former Mossad officer Victor Ostrovsky reported in his book By Way of Deception that Israel had foreknowledge of the bombings but failed to warn their American and French “allies,” and thus allowed the attack to happen. An interesting article entitled “The Myth of the Suicide Bomber” makes this salient point: “The odd thing about this story is not that the Israelis neglected to warn the Americans, but that they could even imagine that the Americans would be the target rather than themselves. Why would they think that? The Israelis use the deception of admitting some knowledge as a way of deflecting suspicion away from themselves as perpetrators. In this case the admission of prior knowledge reveals more than disregard, it reveals an inconsistency that makes me believe they were the bombers.“
The goal of the Syria war is not only to topple the Assad government, but to drag Iran into the fight as well, which would in effect enable the killing of ‘two birds with one stone’. Iran and Syria have a mutual defense pact, so if Syria is attacked by one of Israel’s Western slave armies, Iran will be forced into the fray, which is exactly what the Zionists want. The one nation that could put a stop to all of this madness is Russia. If Putin has any sense left in him, he will deploy air and ground forces into Syria immediately to crush the rebel-terrorists once and for all. This action could prevent World War Three and save the world from nuclear Armageddon.
Western super-powers such as England and the United States are more than willing to annihilate Israel’s adversaries in the middle east. These nations have a long history of invasion, conquest, terrorism and mass murder. Killing and conquering has been a favourite pastime of the American and British elite for centuries. According to some sources, the British Empire is responsible — both directly and indirectly — for the deaths of over 100,000,000 people in the past four hundred years. In a book called “Late Victorian Holocausts,” published in 2001, author Mike Davis tells the story of British-engineered famines that killed between 12 and 29 million Indians in the late 18th century. The British government interned people in concentration camps during the Boer Wars of the late 18th and early 19th centuries, where tens of thousands of White Boers and Black Africans perished of disease and starvation. They did so again during World War Two and also in the 1950s in Kenya during the suppression of the Mau Mau revolt against British colonial rule. George Monbiot highlighted three books which outline some of Britain’s gut-wrenching atrocities around the world:
“Three recent books – Britain’s Gulag by Caroline Elkins, Histories of the Hanged by David Anderson, and Web of Deceit by Mark Curtis – show how white settlers and British troops suppressed the Mau Mau revolt in Kenya in the 1950s. Thrown off their best land and deprived of political rights, the Kikuyu started to organise – some of them violently – against colonial rule. The British responded by driving up to 320,000 of them into concentration camps. Most of the remainder – more than a million – were held in “enclosed villages”. Prisoners were questioned with the help of “slicing off ears, boring holes in eardrums, flogging until death, pouring paraffin over suspects who were then set alight, and burning eardrums with lit cigarettes”. British soldiers used a “metal castrating instrument” to cut off testicles and fingers. “By the time I cut his balls off,” one settler boasted, “he had no ears, and his eyeball, the right one, I think, was hanging out of its socket.” The soldiers were told they could shoot anyone they liked “provided they were black”. Elkins’s evidence suggests that more than 100,000 Kikuyu were either killed or died of disease and starvation in the camps. David Anderson documents the hanging of 1,090 suspected rebels: far more than the French executed in Algeria. Thousands more were summarily executed by soldiers, who claimed they had “failed to halt” when challenged. These are just two examples of at least 20 such atrocities overseen and organised by the British government or British colonial settlers; they include, for example, the Tasmanian genocide, the use of collective punishment in Malaya, the bombing of villages in Oman, the dirty war in North Yemen, the evacuation of Diego Garcia.”
The United States hasn’t quite reached that mind-blowing level of homicidal mania, mainly because it hasn’t been around for very long. If given a few more centuries to catch up, the U.S. will probably match the bloody track record of its British patrons. According to Arthur Blum, the author of several books about the American empire, the U.S. military has laid waste to upwards of six million people since World War Two, and that is a thirteen year old estimate. You can tack a couple million onto that number to account for the Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya wars. The U.S. has overthrown over fifty foreign governments since World War Two. The U.S. has sponsored countless insurgencies and has installed a plethora of maniac dictators all over the world. The U.S. government has literally flattened entire countries with bombs, poisoning their environments for decades to come with chemical and biological weapons.
Much like the true histories of Communism and Zionism, the true histories of British colonial havoc and American global death-dealing have never really been fully revealed to the general public of most Western countries in any qualitative way. George Monbiot poignantly writes: “It is not illegal to discuss the millions who were killed under the British empire. So why do so few people know about them? It encourages continued murder and human rights abuses by the arrogant inheritors of that empire, empowered by your mass silence and ignorance.” The creation of Israel was another war crime sponsored by these two Western Goliaths of carnage, chaos and mayhem. Yes, many Jews are part of this power structure, but Jews are not the only factor. Jewish and Western elites have collaborated for centuries to bring about a world order of subjugated slaves. The British elite are just as guilty. The American elite are just as guilty. All of these guilty parties deserve punishment. Only a sell-out wishing to protect war criminals and psychopaths would suggest otherwise.
by Rand Clifford
Actions trump lies. Evidence does not lie . . . so how has the American public been so brainwashed by lies, in light of so much evidence? Are Zionists that intelligent, or is the American public that unintelligent—and how did even that obvious question become a “third-rail issue”?
Totally uncool, our tradition of being outsmarted by Zionists even to the point of “Rothschilding” our descendants’ future.
Is it possible for the American public to think their way out of Zionist enslavement . . . or is Gaza a preview of our future?
There certainly is genius behind creation of the terms, “conspiracy theory,” and, “anti-Semitism.” Mere concepts, these two seem among the highest human inventions in terms of neutralizing independent thought. Both terms are amazingly popular and effective; a function, perhaps, of both being technically meaningless—a reliable Zionist mind-control touch, confusion.
• “conspiracy theory” was born to describe anything that questions official, establishment positions. Problem is, in the realm of establishment positioning, by definition, everything is conspiracy, putting the term conspiracy theory in the same league as “wet water”
• “anti-Semitism” refers to Semites, “A member of any of a number of peoples including Akkadians, Phoenicians, Hebrews, and Arabs” (Merriam-Webster). “Anti-Zionist” is a meaningful substitute for anti-Semitic—but watch that “third rail”
9/11 was trademark Zionist false-flag testing of what they might get away with, a pushing of boundaries that, magically, stayed in bounds. Zionists third-rail magicians still brag about 9/11.
Merriam-Webster defines “third rail” as:
1: a metal rail through which electric current is led to the motors of an electric vehicle (as a subway car); 2: a controversial issue usually avoided by politicians
Touching that third rail supplying power to trains means electrocution. Politically, third-rail issues are just as not-to-be-touched; same thing socially . . . regarding “politically-correct” conversation, third rail issues beg for the spouting of “conspiracy theory” or “anti-Semitism,” often both.
Sweet success, utter hubris
Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu’s early reaction to 9/11 success was: “It’s very good!”—that was before he corralled his hubris, adjusted his face, and said, “Well, it’s not actually good, but it will generate immediate sympathy for Israel.”
Zionist complicity in, if not masterminding of 9/11 . . . if you wonder about that, check out this celebration of “Purim.” Don’t miss this year’s winners in the amateur costume parade —twins dressed up as the Twin Towers being blasted by “airliners”—bitchin’ smoke, flame and chutzpah. 
Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon said to Israeli foreign minister Shimon Peres on October 3, 2001 (twenty-two days after 9/11 success): “We, the Jewish people, control America, and the Americans know it.” 
Two problems with Sharon’s hubris: historically, above all the Jewish people are crucial Zionist tools; little evidence suggests that the American public has any idea who is in control, or how far politicos they vote for are removed from actual power. Still, Sharon actually told some truth.
J. William Fulbright
Senator J. William Fulbright, Chair of Senate Foreign Relations Committee said on CBS’ Face the Nation, October 7, 1973: “The Israelis control the policy in the Congress and the Senate.” 
Senator Fulbright’s candor got him unseated by a candidate laundered in by the American Israeli Political Action Committee (AIPAC—currently veiled as the American Israeli Public Affairs Committee). AIPAC defeated a senator courageous enough tell the truth—a US senator, not a Zionist drone. We used to have a handful of our own senators.
While money taught Fulbright a lesson, with Zionist domination of American mainstream media (ZMM), America’s public brain has been washed, spun. . . .
Standard Zionist chutzpah regarding ZMM orbits the idea, “We tell Americans what to think. If we change our minds, we’ll change their minds.”
Dr. Kevin Barrett
Dr. Kevin Barrett wrote recently, relating to Zionists: “We own the media, Hollywood, the banking system, Congress, and the White House. If we said the Fishy-Smelling Underwater Kingdom of Atlantis was a legitimate state, and a giant squid was its prime minister, we could make you believe us.” 
Blaming the Jewish people for Zionism seems similar to blaming Americans for being under Zionist control. Zionists have proven over centuries that Jews are, in the name of greater Zionism, expendable. Zionist sacrifice of Jews, with perceptions managed Zionistically, offers stellar opportunities for concoction of history in Zionist favor. .
Americans resist thinking for themselves—at least publicly, wary of being pecked by the flock for being “different” (chickens excel at that). Regarding Americans courageous enough for intelligent inquiry and analysis into evidence bleeding under the wall of ZMM . . . you are being watched as the Internet is being Zionized.
Wikipedia is now recognized by Zionist Israel as “ . . . THE major source of information in the world.” It’s even advertised with standard Zionist chutzpah that Wikipedia is “ . . . under constant, paid review of Zionist assets.” 
By way of deception thou shalt do war
In addition to being the motto for Mossad (Israel’s “CIA”), “By Way Of Deception Thou Shalt Do War” expresses their style of committing false-flag atrocities and blaming them on scapegoats, enemies they want the US to destroy. The Israeli attack on the USS Liberty, June 8, 1967, is a vivid display of Zionist style.
It was the fourth day of Israel’s Six-Day War of expansionist aggression against Egypt, Syria and Lebanon. A long-planned war to invade and annex Jerusalem, the West Bank, the Golan Heights and the Sinai Peninsula.
A calm and clear June morning in the Eastern Mediterranean, where the USS Liberty patrolled international waters fourteen miles from the coast of Egypt’s Sinai Peninsula. Liberty was the world’s most sophisticated intelligence ship, a $40,000,000 signals intelligence platform (SIGNIT) with a crew of 294.
About 6 am local time, an Israeli reconnaissance plane spotted the USS Liberty just outside of Israeli coastal radar.
Israeli planes flew out and repeatedly circled the ship on eight different sequences over the next eight hours . . . and then—
Unmarked fighter jets attacked the Liberty at 2 pm, initially targeting the command bridge, communications antennas, and four .50 caliber machine guns placed to repel boarders.
After the first wave spent their ordnance, consecutive new waves of fighters added napalm to the rocket and 30 mm cannon fire. Liberty was able to contact The Sixth Fleet in the Mediterranean about nine minutes into the attack. The aircraft carrier USS Saratoga launched fighters to aid the Liberty . . . but before making visual contact, the fighters were ordered to return to the Saratoga. Fighters were also launched by the USS America, and were also ordered—again by the White House—to stand down!
Did LBJ Cover for Israel?
Never before or since in US history have planes been launched to aid an American ship being attacked, and ordered back before reaching fellow service-members under fire. On June 8, 1967, it happened twice.
Any refusal to help fellow service-members under attack is a criminal matter.
President Lyndon Johnson was noted as saying: “I don’t give a damn if every man drowns and the ship sinks. I don’t want to embarrass our allies.”
Forty minutes into the attack, fighter jets disengaged and three unmarked torpedo boats closed in. Five torpedoes were launched—one blasting the Liberty’s research spaces, killing another twenty-five crew. Torpedo boats then raked the Liberty port and starboard with cannon and machine-gun fire, targeting anyone who came above decks, firefighters and their equipment especially.
The Liberty was ablaze and listing when her seriously-wounded captain, Commander William McGonagle, gave the order to abandon ship.
Torpedo boats machine-gunned Liberty’s crowded lifeboats, sinking two before Israelis realized that news of their treachery had gotten out of control. The torpedo boats suddenly broke off their attack and started radioing the Liberty—“Do you need assistance?”
An Israeli naval officer notified the US Naval attache’ at the embassy in Tel Aviv that Israeli forces had mistakenly attacked an American ship:
“We’re sorry. . . .”
Israel’s attack on the USS Liberty is an American monument to shame forty-seven years old. Even Zionist-fantasy screenplays cannot sink the evidence. President Johnson and Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara may have had no problem sacrificing the USS Liberty and her crew to the cause of greater Zionism, but virtually everyone else high in the US command chain considered Israel’s “mistaken identity” claims to be pure lies.
Johnson ordered that all inquiry into the matter conclude: mistaken identity. And the Liberty sacrifice remains the only serious naval episode never to be investigated by Congress. The only one—even though evidence is explicit that, with full knowledge and intent of targeting an American ship, Israel attacked the USS Liberty with unmarked (camouflaged) planes and boats, fourteen miles off the coast of Egypt. Exactly what happened has never really been an issue; it’s all about how much the US will allow Zionists to get away with.
Liberty’s damage included 861 holes the size of a man’s hand and larger, thousands of .50 caliber machine gun holes, the torpedo wound, fire damage. . . . But, instead of sending the Liberty and all of its gathered intelligence to the bottom, along with 294 Americans, Zionists had to settle for only 34 dead crewmen, 171 wounded, and a nightmare of evidence and witnesses.
Israel clings to the fantasy of mistaking the Liberty for the Egyptian El Quiser, a rusted-out old horse transport. Some immediate problems with that were:
• lead pilot of the first wave of Israeli fighters argued with headquarters about the Liberty flying three American flags. Ordered to ignore the flags and attack, the pilot refused—so did another pilot; both flew back to headquarters as the attack commenced, both were arrested after landing, and jailed for years
• radio arguments between Israeli command and the disobeying pilots were heard by radio monitors at the US embassy in Lebanon. Israeli commanders ordering pilots to attack an American ship—and the pilots’ refusals—were also picked up by radio operators in Germany, Spain . . . many places
• Richard S. Sturman, a surviving USS Liberty radioman, said: “Two Israeli pilots, commencing their strafing-run, reported to their headquarters that the USS LIBERTY was an American ship. They were ordered to attack nonetheless! Those two pilots, refusing to attack, returned to their base, were arrested, court marshaled and given harsh jail sentences.”
In 2001, it was revealed that a US Navy EC-121 surveillance aircraft with top intelligence-gathering sophistication electronically recorded from high altitude the entire attack on the Liberty. Such immaculate evidence didn’t seem to matter.
And Israel did chip in $6 million, apparently the market price for 34 Americans killed, 171 wounded, plus the material damage—the $40,000,000 SIGNIT platform called the USS Liberty was sold as scrap for $102,666.66. Numerology . . . mark of the beast, anyone?
The home front
Congress is pathetic. Recent polls reflect 11% of American adults believing Congress to be a good reflection of the views of the American people. Basically, a 90% disapproval rating for Congress. People might be waking up.
NETANYAHU BEFORE CONGRESS!
Another poll revealed a 10% favorable view of America’s “political media”—another 90% disapproval.
Polls showing a mere 29% of American consumers of ZMM trusting Zionist perception management called “news” might also sound encouraging, unless one considers that 99% of Americans polled think Iran is a threat to the vital interests of the United States. Iran is “our” enemy, despite Americans knowing almost nothing about Iran, and Iranians—it’s all ZMM propaganda. Ever seen the movie, “Argo”? 
So how was a population with 29% trust of ZMM essentially 100% programmed by what they don’t trust into believing lies about something they know virtually nothing about?  Perhaps the same way Americans have been programmed to accept the “Federal Reserve System” for 100 years, even renewal of its charter for another 100 years.
Before 9/11 birthed the “Global War on Terror” (GWOT) to aim American blood and treasure at Israel’s enemies, 189 of Earth’s 196 recognized “sovereign” nations had a Rothschild-controlled central bank. Afghanistan, Libya, Sudan, Iran, Cuba, Iraq, and North Korea were those last seven nations resisting Rothschild enslavement.
Now, only Cuba, North Korea, and Iran remain free. Notice how high Iran and North Korea are on our list of enemies?
Please see “The Incredible Debt Spider” for more information regarding the fed, and Rothschild-controlled central banking. 
Debt that can never be paid off, only grow. Power of creating money from nothing and loaning it to nations at compounding interest . . . the “magic” of Rothschild-controlled central banking. America’s infection is called the “Federal Reserve System,” a private, for-profit corporation independent of the federal government. The Fed has no reserves, is simply a system for transferring wealth from the people to the elite via national debt, GWOT, “benign global hegemony” (Partnership for the New American Century), bank bailouts . . . whatever it takes for, as George Bush I stated, “The continuous consolidation of wealth and power into higher, tighter, and righter hands.” 
The whole Rothschild Usury Mill (RUM) offers only one destiny or conclusion, only one horizon: Rothschilds will own the entire planet. They are already closer to global ownership than few people other than the elite might imagine. The US has a potentially-fatal RUM infection. On the horizon we see imminence of bank “bail-ins.” Austerity, raiding of personal bank accounts, pension funds, “entitlements”—whatever “low-hanging fruit” might keep the RUM scam-of-all-time going a little longer.
Are there any flashes of hope on the Rothschild-controlled horizon?
The Real Enemy
KNOW THY ENEMY
How’s this for a textbook Zionist mind-control twist? Our “best friend” that has given us more ever-accelerating grief and extracted from us more blood and treasure than all of our “enemies” combined has as a number-one enemy called Iran. Zionists are willing to spill every last drop of American blood, divert every American social expenditure to fund war crimes, and exhaust American treasure not already plundered by the GWOT, TARP, the Fed—all those classic symptoms of runaway RUM infection . . . building up to their ultimate usury coup de grâce, WWIII. But. . . .
After years of saber rattling, and employing perception-management devices all the way to Hollywood’s Academy Awards to convince Americans that the one nation that might actually save us from Zionism is enemy number-one, Zionists are yet to attack Iran. What’s in the way?
Apparently, something Zionists cannot Zionize. Treachery, duplicity, blackmail, bribery, extortion, fraud, terrorism, car bombs, pitting Israel’s enemies against each other—nothing in the obscene Zionist toolkit offers any succor. Are Zionists potentially at the mercy of their obvious, ultimate nemesis, humanity?
More specifically, are Zionists being thwarted by human invention for the good of humanity? Tesla kinds of power?
J.P. Morgan and his Rothschild masters did a masterful job of scrubbing Tesla from public consciousness.  But now, is “another Tesla” threatening the Zionist grip on humanity—a genius from Iran no less? His name is Mehran Tavakoli Keshe. 
Mehran Tavakoli Keshe is an
Iranian nuclear scientist
The longer Iran goes without being attacked militarily, the more likely it seems that, through the genius of Keshe and other brilliant minds, Iran is developing technology to render all modes of modern warfare obsolete. Could there be a greater gift to humanity than immunity against Zionist aggression—or a more obvious reason for Iran to be Zionist enemy number one?
Could Keshe be the most important person on Earth to protect from Mossad?
Humanity free of Zionism . . . try to imagine the horizon, the potential for positive growth and decency—the sheer humanity of disarming the elite. Imagine the elite global war/genocide machine dead in its tracks.
If we have any chance of outsmarting Zionism, one of our greatest allies might be mass awareness of Zionism itself. Not ZMM propaganda, but truth. Then again, after being vaccinated by ZMM for so long, might Americans be immune to truth?
10. Truth, By George
12. Keshe Foundation
Rand Clifford lives in Spokane, Washington. His novels, CASTLING, TIMING, PRIEST LAKE CATHEDRAL, and many earlier articles are published by StarChief Press. Contact for Rand Clifford: email@example.com.
See more at:
The Obama Administration Prepares a “Marshall Plan” to Reconstruct Syria, But Not for the Syrians
War by Another Name in Syria
by FRANKLIN LAMB
June 20, 2013
The Group of Eight leaders meeting in Lough Erne, Northern Ireland, having called for an international conference on the ongoing crisis in Syria to be held “as soon as possible” could not agree on much else that might end the civil war anytime soon there. The White House now is reportedly in private agreement with Russia and Iran that the Assad government will remain in power until next year’s election.
Consequently, an 18 month old US-led Plan B has been dusted off by the Obama administration according to Washington Congressional and Beirut diplomatic sources. If successful, there is growing confidence among pro-Zionist neocons in Congress that while Syrian regime-change has failed for several reasons that thwarted the Gulf funded military campaign, Syria can still be brought to heel through an economic campaign dressed to look, well, down right “humanitarian.”
The term “equivalent of the Marshall Plan” is being employed by some in the White House and Pentagon this month to describe a proposed large-scale “humanitarian rescue program” being prepared for Syria, according to some Western diplomats based in Lebanon.
However, the 1948 Marshall Plan (officially the European Recovery Program or ERP) was an American program to aid Europe, through which the United States provided $13 billion, in today’s monetary terms, approximately 100 billion dollars of economic support, to help rebuild European economies devastated by war.
With respect to Syria, the “equivalent of the Marshall Plan” currently being finalized is very different from what General George |C. Marshall explained to his Harvard University audience, 66 years ago this month, when he announced the post WW II initiative.
The planned project to conquer Syria amounts to 19th century economic imperialism as a means to achieve control of Syria by hijacking its economy while shielding Israel from the rising tide of protests in this region, as armed groups across the spectrum are beginning to focus on directly confronting the Zionist theft and continuing occupation of Palestine.
What Washington has in mind constitutes an attempt to gain control over Syria by controlling its economy via contracts for rebuilding the country and “lending” the hoped for post-Assad Syrian government as much as 300 billion dollars to be secured by Syrian assets. IMF economists estimate the value of the public sector in Syria, exceeds half a trillion dollars. Under the US-led plan, creditors can take control of ownership of the public sector if Syria accepts the plan for pledges to secure debt. The buyers of the debt will be largely American and indirectly Israeli businessmen as well as from the Gulf. Qatar specifically is gambling on this plan, to work with “international parties”, to immerse Syria in debt, and then drive the country to sell the private sector at a very small fraction of their true values.
Some who are warning against the scheme point out that Syrians are capable of rebuilding their own country and have the labor force and raw materials to do it. Foreign aid will be welcomed by the Syrian government but not at the price of ceding the Arab Syrian Republic to a new western crafted economic order. What is hidden in the war on Syria is reported to be much bigger than has been divulged to date, and involves winding down the military actions in favor of economic aggression against the Syrian population which the layers of US sanctions to date is just a harbinger.
In this context, according to Western Diplomatic sources, the US government and some Gulf countries have tried to bribe Rami Makhlouf, a cousin of Syria’s President, to break with the government and leave the country. Some other well-known figures have also been offered large sums of cash to break ranks. Last month, one prominent Syrian nationalist who works with the government told this observer of receiving a $50 million dollar offer to defect and leave Syria. The official rejected the bribe and ridiculed the government that made the offer by explaining that as proud Syrian nationalists, no amount of money would break the sacred bond between Syrians and their country.
With respect to Mr. Maklouf, he did not react to being placed on the US Treasury Department’s “Specially Designated Nationals” (SDN) list which blocks assets and prohibits, under severe penalties, U.S. citizens from dealing with them, nor did he dignify an American clemency offer with even a reply. Rather he has maintained his steadfast support for Syria in the face of several attempts to assassinate him as well as targeting him, as a leader of the Syrian business community, with American orchestrated (OFAC) defamatory media campaigns, to pressure President Bashar al-Assad to break with him. Rather than rejecting Syria for American offers of protection, Makhlouf channeled much of his assets for the benefit of domestic charities and rehabilitative projects, providing jobs for the unemployed and loans for small investors as well as “at cost” family housing for many of the internally displaced. This initiative continues. Makhlouf has provided his borse shares in the largest telecommunications companies in Syria to charity associations in order to insure financial independence and resources that the Authority can rely upon, to ease somewhat, the devastating effects on the current crisis on the Syrian civil society.
According to analysts among the Western diplomatic corps in Beirut, many wealthy Syrian capitalists fell into the U.S. trap, wherein SDN economic sanctions prompted them to leave Syria and defect from the regime. The United States and its European partners continue to wage an economic war against Syria by imposing crippling sanctions which are affecting the lives of ordinary citizens in many ways from food and fuel costs to medical care.
Why Rami Makhlouf and other strong nationalists in Syria’s business community are being targeted as a prelude to fully launching the US-led “Syrian Marshall Plan” is that their bonds with Syria as well as their business acumen are blocking the Western scheme because they provide the Syrian government with much needed additional financial strength to rebuild Syria, in cooperation with other countries, but without being subject to the economically fatal conditions the US-led plan envisages. Many in the financial and academic community view the proposed SMP plan as nearly certain to hold the Syrian economy hostage to foreigners for scores of years.
The US Treasury Department considers Makhlouf and others like him in the Syrian business community as fully capable, if allowed, of helping Syria’s government to collect huge sums from international investors to help rebuild Syria without being subject to Western domination.
“The anti-Mahhlouf black propaganda campaign, according to a Washington DC source familiar with the intensified preparations, commented that the SMP was designed to include a wide ranging assault in the visual and written media, audio, as well as in the electronic media: “Almost certainty funded by Qatar and Saudi Arabia, both of which like their western partners who are actually constructing the SMP project, view Makhlouf as a key obstacle to realizing their plans to hijack and control the Syrian economy as part of a soft war, whereby the US and its allies, western and middle eastern, controls Arab economies while keeping US boots off the grounds of Arabia or spending more US treasure in this region.”
Targeting Rami Makhlouf, and other Syrian businessmen by Qatari media and other Arabic paid media outlets, is designed to hit Syria economically, because weakening the Syrian economic security at its core, is a more certain path, than endless military campaigns, to quickly smash the state. Makhlouf and his colleagues are seen as preventing this.
The ultimate goal of Qatar and certain Gulf countries, with US complicity, is not just expanding their investments in this region, as much as Doha is intent on connecting the Arab world to the American-Zionist axis politically and economically. The speed with which Israeli, Gulf, and Western businessmen showed up at the Corinthian, Radisson and Rixos hotels in Tripoli, Libya, literally within days of the murder of Moammar Qaddafi, “to help rebuild this country” is instructive on these same interests seeking to control a war damaged country by removing obstacles. Indeed, Russian intelligence reported at the time that the salafists who apprehended Qaddafi in Serte on October 20, 2011, as he attempted to flee, received verbal instructions from a Gulf country (UAE) to kill him in order to eliminate competition for dominating the Libyan economy and to silence those who might torpedo their best laid plans.
The targeting of Mr. Rami Makhlouf and dozens of like-minded Syrian businessmen, who refused to abandon their country, continues. Yet today, like thousands of other Syrian volunteers including the approximately 10,000 who work with the Syrian Arab Red Crescent Society (SARCS) their time and resources serve their country in order to lessen the suffering of the civilian population. They have stood firm and did not flee, as did some corrupt former supporters and officials of the government.
This week, Syria’s President put the goal of the Marshall Plan for Syria succinctly, without identifying it, “What is happening in Syria is a project for those states to push a non-submissive state towards the brink and to look for a new president who says ‘yes’ (to their orders). They have not found and they will not find one in the future,” Assad stressed while adding, “The interference is a blatant violation of international law and the sovereignty of this country; they (western states and their Gulf allies) want to destabilize the country and spread chaos and backwardness.”
Franklin Lamb is doing research in Syria and Lebanon and can be reached c/o firstname.lastname@example.org