The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion

Statement of Roy Arthur Topham regarding his Arrest on May 16th, 2012 on the charge of “Willful promotion of hatred CC 319(2)”

May 16, 2013 by admin Leave a Comment

ARREST STATEMENT OF ROY ARTHUR TOPHAM
REGARDING HIS ARREST AND INCARCERATION BY THE RCMP ON
WEDNESDAY, MAY 16TH, 2012 IN QUESNEL, B.C. ON THE CHARGE OF:

“Willful Promotion of Hatred CC 319(2)”

Posted May 16th, 2013 on 1st Anniversary of this Event

Arthur Topham

[Editor's Note: In the interests of freedom of speech and freedom of the Internet I am posting my "Arrest Statement" which my former lawyer Mr. Douglas Christie advised me to write soon after my arrest on May 16th, 2012. His wise counsel was that this case would likely drag on in the courts for years and by the time it came to trial (should such an event arise) that many of the details of my recollection of that fateful day would by then be hazy and doubtful. Acting on Mr. Christie's advice I wrote out a detailed description of what took place that May morning last year. It's an interesting picture of what can happen to you here in Canada should the Jewish lobby decide they don't like being criticized. Read. Heed. And please pass it on to your friends and associates. ~Arthur Topham]

On Wednesday, May 16th, 2012 I started out my work day travelling out to my mining property on the 2400 Rd off the Barkerville Hwy to meet up with the Petro Canada fuel truck at 9:30 a.m. I was having the company fuel truck filled with 1200 gallons of diesel fuel for use during the upcoming placer mining operations for this season. When that was completed I returned home to my residence at 4633 Barkerville Hwy and prepared for a trip up to Prince George where I had to go to the Richie Bros. Auctioneers site to pick up some mining equipment that my business associate had recently purchased at an auction on May 10th. My business partner and wife, Shastah Topham, came along with me and we left our home at approximately 11:00 a.m. heading west toward Quesnel.

Plans had also been made ahead of time to meet another mining associate at Princess Auto in Prince George at 1 p.m. and between the two of us we would haul equipment back to my placer claims on the 2400 Road.

Due to the fact that the Petro Canada fuel truck was a bit late in arriving at the site plus the additional time necessary to fuel the 1200 gallon truck I was running behind schedule by about half an hour.

We were travelling in a 2009 Chev pickup owned by my mining associate with whom I am presently in a Joint Venture Agreement.

When one leaves my property at 4633 Barkerville Hwy you must turn right on to the Barkerville Hwy in order to travel toward Quesnel and Hwy 97 the route necessary to travel in order to get to Prince George. The section of Hwy 26 (Barkerville Hwy) that runs past my residence stretches in a straight line for approximately 1 km. As soon as I pulled out on to the road I immediately saw that there was a white pickup truck sitting adjacent to the eastbound lane of highway just before the road descended down a small dip and passes Cottonwood Historic Site.

As we drove toward it I remarked to my wife, “There’s the cops sitting there. Looks like they’re either waiting to catch Willie again or maybe they’re doing surveillance on Don Carter’s property. Don Carter has been experiencing ongoing harassment by the Canadian Revenue Agency over the past few years and has also had numerous encounters with the RCMP in conjunction with the CRA.

As we approached the white pickup we could see two men in dark clothing sitting in it trying to look as unobtrusive as possible. Again I said to my wife, “If we weren’t running so damn late I’d stop and asked them if they were lost or needed any assistance.”

As we crested the dip and passed Cottonwood Historic Site I noted that within a minute or so the white pickup was now following us. I asked my wife is she was buckled up (she was) and then I set my vehicle on cruise control at about 95 cpm. The limit was 90 kph so I knew that at least if the cops were going to stop me they wouldn’t have the excuse that I was speeding.

As we proceeded on toward Quesnel Shastah was spoon-feeding me my breakfast as I drove because we were too late for me to sit down at home and eat before leaving. I remarked to my wife that the cops were likely watching us through their binoculars and wondering what she was doing. We also were discussing the vehicle that was now so obviously tailing us. It’s always a joke for the locals around Cottonwood when the police come and try to set up either a surveillance vehicle or radar to catch unwary speeders. The cops never seem to understand that when you live in a very small, tight-knit community that everyone in the area is very aware of who drives what type of vehicle and when they see a vehicle parked on the side of the highway with people sitting in it they know right away that they’re either broke down or else cops.

We continued along the highway talking about cops and related issues until we reached the top of 11 Mile Hill. When one begins to descend you are overlooking the Fraser Valley viewshed and can see westward for over a hundred kilometres. About half way down I noted that a regular white coloured RCMP van with the usual bells and whistles was now directly behind the white pickup. At the same time, due to the steep grade of the hill, I was also watching my own speedometer to make sure I didn’t begin coasting beyond the 100 km speed limit. As we neared the bottom of the hill the RCMP van’s lights came on. I told Shastah and proceeded to slow down and pull over on the right hand side of the highway just where the road levelled off.

How Many Jews? by Douglas Reed

April 30, 2013 by admin 1 Comment

How Many Jews?

Douglas Reed

[Editor's Note: The issue involving the "6 Million Jews" purported to have been gassed and roasted (holocausted) in German concentration camps during WWII continues to be hotly debated within the alternative media sixty-eight years after the war's end. In the case of the Jewish media aka the msm, their ongoing insistence on repeatedly reinforcing their own self-chosen figure of 6 million well after being proven to be historically inaccurate has created greater and greater skepticism on the part of truth-seekers everywhere who, now thanks to the Internet and the freeing up of the facts and the hidden information surrounding this controversy, are realizing that the 6 million lies of the Jews is nothing but Zionist Jew propaganda designed to buttress their failed attempt at mesmerizing and brainwashing the world into believing the greatest lie ever told throughout recorded history.

One of the earliest debunkers of the 6 million myth was British war correspondent and author Douglas Reed. Having lived through WWI and covered WWII in depth Reed was well aware of the historic context in which he lived and wrote. His comments below on the impossibility of ascertaining with any accuracy the actual number of Jews supposedly living in Europe from 1939 until 1945 are taken from Chapter 42 of his 1956 classic, The Controversy of Zion and give the reader a much needed reference point from which to judge just who is more correct when it comes to this ongoing clash over how many Jews died during WWII.]

from
Chapter 42
The Talmudic Vengeance

The trials of “war criminals” formed the peaks of the vengeance and the Everest of them all was reached in the Nuremberg trial of the chief Nazi leaders….

By the choice of the Jewish Day of Judgment for the hanging of the Nazi leaders and German commanders the Western leaders gave the conclusion of the Second War this aspect of a vengeance exacted specifically in the name of “the Jews.” The shape which the trial took showed the purpose of the immense propaganda of falsification conducted during the war, which I have earlier described. “Crimes against Jews” were singled out as a separate count, as if Jews were different from other human beings (and when the judgment was delivered a hundred million human beings in Eastern Europe had been handed over to the general persecution of all men, from which Jews in their proportion suffered in Germany). This particular indictment was made “the crux of the case” against the defendants (Captain Liddell Hart’s words) and was based on the assertion that “six million Jews” had been killed (as time went by the word “perished” was substituted for “killed”). An impartial court would at the outset have thrown out any suit based on this completely unverifiable assertion: At Nuremberg lawyers, who in a private case would have demanded acquittal on the strength of an unproven statement in respect of a decimal point or digit, used this fantastic figure as the basis of their demand for conviction.

I earlier described, with illustrations from Jewish sources, the process by means of which, over the years, the Jews were “singled out” from the mass of Hitler’s victims and their number inflated at will from day to day (Hitler’s book-bonfire became “the burning of Jewish books”; his concentration camps where ninety percent of the inmates were Germans became concentration camps for Jews; a wartime report about the killing of” 150,000 White Russians, Ukrainians and Jews at Kieff” was changed to “150,000 Jews”; and so on interminably).

The statement about the “six million Jews,” allowed to pass without question by the men on the bench, was the end-product of this process. In six years of war the Germans, Japanese and Italians, using every lethal means, killed 824,928 British, British Commonwealth and American fighting-men, merchant sailors and civilians. Assuming that the Germans killed, say, half of these in Europe, they killed (according to this assertion) fifteen times as many Jews there. To do that, they would have needed such quantities of men, weapons, transports, guards and materials as would have enabled them to win the war many times over.

The figure would not even deserve scrutiny if it had not been used to give the Second War the brand of “a Jewish war” and if that, again, did not foreshadow the shape of any third war. Because of that, it may be examined here.

At no time in history, from antiquity to this day, can the number of Judahites, Judeans or Jews, living at any given time, be determined; for that reason the number afflicted in any calamity also cannot be determined, and there are many more reasons why the number of Jewish victims in the Second World War cannot be fixed. The process of mystification begins in Genesis and continues through the Torah (the seventy people taken by Jacob to Egypt, for instance, apparently increased to two or three million within 150 years). At all periods large, and sometimes huge variations occur in the “estimates,” and only estimates are possible, as the present term, “Jew,” is legally indefinable and statistically elusive.

An eminent Jewish authority, Dr. Hans Kohn, in his article on “the distribution of Jews” in the Encyclopaedia Britannica Book of the Year for 1942, writes:

“In view of the fact that in several of the countries where the largest number of Jews were living in 1941 the census did not contain any questions regarding religion … the exact number of Jews in the world in 1941 could not be ascertained. The definition of persons falling under the classification of ‘Jewish race’ is in no way agreed upon … In countries where the census included questions of religious origins, even this religious criterion of Jewish faith is difficult to define exactly. Thus the assumption which generally varied around the figure of 16 million” (for the entire world) “cannot claim any foundation on exact ‘figures. To this uncertainty about the number of Jews in the world was added in recent years a growing uncertainty about their numerical distribution in the different countries and continents. Probably more than 6,000,000 Jews lived in Poland and the U.S.S.R.”

A weaker basis than that even for “estimates” (not to speak of “statistics”) can hardly be imagined, yet in the ensuing period, when all the additional confusions of war and occupation were piled on this infirm foundation, precise numbers of Jewish casualties were produced day by day, circulated by thousands of assiduous propagandists, and at the end declared to amount to six millions!

Dr. Kohn says that “probably” more than 6,000,000 Jews lived in Poland and U.S.S.R. in 1941. In respect of the U.S.S.R. this might corroborate another Jewish authority (Prof. H.M.T. Loewe), who said in the Encyclopaedia Britannica of 1937 that 2,700,000 Jews then lived there. Similarly, four years earlier (1933) the Jewish journal Opinion had stated that the Jewish population of the U.S.S.R. was under 3,000,000; and the Soviet official Encyclopaedia in 1953 stated that “the Jewish population of the Soviet Union in 1939 was 3,020,000.”

This near agreement among four authorities in respect of the period 1933-1941 might lead the reader to think that the number of Jews in one country at least (the U.S.S.R.) was established with reasonable accuracy at a given time. On the contrary, this is a statistical jungle where nothing is ever established. In 1943 the Jewish Commissar Mikhoels said in London (according to the Johannesburg Jewish Times of 1952), “Today we have in the Soviet Union 5,000,000 Jews.” That is two million more than two years before, and if it was true presumably meant that most of the Jews in Poland, after Hitler and Stalin fell out, moved into Soviet territory. However, in the same issue of the Jewish Times a leading Jewish writer, Mr. Joseph Leftwich, stated that the Jewish population of the U.S.S.R. in 1952 was 2,500,000, “a loss since 1943 of 2,500,000.” He asked, “where and how did they disappear?”; the answer, in my judgment, is that most of them disappeared into the statistics.

That is not the end of the confusion in this one section of the question. The Encyclopaedia Britannica of 1937 (in giving the above-cited figure of 2,700,000 Jews in Russia on Jewish authority) said they formed about six percent of the total population. The total population was elsewhere given in the same encyclopaedia as 145,000,000 and six percent of that would be 8,700,000!

The encyclopaedias, statistical yearbooks and almanacs are in this one question all at odds with each other and untrustworthy. I could multiply examples (for instance, the Jewish World Congress in 1953 announced that the Jewish population of the U.S.S.R. was 1,500,000) but wandering in a maze without an outlet is profitless. All published figures are “estimates” made at the estimators’ pleasure, and are without value. A professional accountant might write a book on the efforts of the encyclopaedists to make the post-war figure of Jewish population in the world conform with the pre-war “estimates,” minus six million. Figures are tricky things: a few examples:

The leading American reference yearbook, the World Almanac, in 1947 gave the 1939 Jewish world-population as 15,688,259. In later editions up to 1952 it increased this prewar estimate (without explanation) by a million, to 16,643,120. It gave the 1950 population as 11,940,000, which, if subtracted from the first figure given for 1939, gives a reduction of nearly four millions (though not of six). However, it based even this “estimate” on another estimate, namely, that in 1950 the Jewish population of the U.S.S.R. was 2,000,000. This still left unanswered Mr. Leftwich’s question in respect of Commissar Mikhoels’s statement, that in 1943 the Jewish population of the U.S.S.R. was 5,000,000.

In England Whitaker’s Almanac, of similar eminence, struggled with the same problem. In its 1949 and 1950 issues it gave the 1939 “estimated” Jewish world population as 16,838,000 and that of 1949 as 11,385,200, a reduction of nearly 5,500,000. However, the figures given for Jewish population in separate countries added up to 13,120,000 (not 11,385,200). Incidentally, Whitaker’s in 1950 gave the Jewish population of the U.S.S.R. as 5,300,000, against the World Almanac’s figure for the same year, of 2,000,000.

Both these publications are of the highest repute for painstaking accuracy and the fault is not theirs; in this one matter alone only Jewish “estimates” are available, and for obvious reasons no dependence can be placed on these. I pointed out the discrepancies in a book of 1951 and observed that Whitaker’s in 1952 no longer contained these “estimates of Jewish populations”; apparently it had abandoned the statistical quest as hopeless, and was right to do so. Another encyclopaedia in its 1950 edition also dropped the subject.

Finally, the New York Times, which may be described as the world’s leading Jewish newspaper (it is Jewish-owned and New York is today primarily a Jewish city) in 1948 published what claimed to be an authoritative statistical article, computing the Jewish population of the world (three years after the war’s end) between 15,700,000 and 18,600,000. If either figure was near truth this meant that the Jewish world-population had remained stationary or increased during the war years.

Newspaper articles are soon forgotten (unless some diligent student preserves them) but the great propagandist fabrications are handed on. Thus the historians, those men of precision in other questions, passed on the legend of “mass-extermination” to posterity. At the war’s end Professor Arnold J. Toynbee was producing his monumental Study of History and in its eighth volume (1954) said that “the Nazis … reduced the Jewish population of Continental Europe, west of the Soviet Union, from about 6,5 million to about l,5 million by a process of mass-extermination.” He called this “a bare statistical statement” and then added a footnote showing that it was not a statistical statement: “it is not possible to give exact figures based on accurate statistics and it seemed improbable in 1952 that the necessary information would ever be obtainable.” Professor Toynbee explains that his figure was based on Jewish “calculations, in which there were several possible sources of error.” He concludes that “it might be estimated” that five million Continental Jews had been done to death by the Nazis.

The estimate is historically valueless. The starting-point for consideration of this question is the fact that six million Jews, or anything approaching that number, cannot possibly have been “done to death” or caused to “perish,” for the reasons given at the start of this discussion; the very assertion, made before the Nuremberg court, was an affront to their 825,000 fighting-men, sailors and civilians, killed in all theatres of war, of which only the Western politicians of this century would have been capable.

The number of Jews who were killed or perished will never be known, for the reasons already stated and partly discovered by Professor Toynbee in his footnote to history. The very term “Jew” is indefinable; Jews are often not isolated in statistics; and at no time can the number of living Jews in the world be ascertained with any approach to accuracy. Indeed, any attempt to reach statistical clarity through census or immigration data is attacked as “discrimination” and “anti-semitism.” For instance:

“Immigrants seeking to settle in Australia will from now on not be asked on application forms if they are Jewish, it was made known in Sydney by the executive committee of Australian Jewry, which protested against this practice to the immigration authorities” (the Jewish Times, Johannesburg). In England, “it is impossible, in the absence of official statistics, to do more than make an intelligent guess … the exact number of Jews in Britain remains a mystery” (the Zionist Record, Johannesburg). In America, President Roosevelt was brought under unremitting pressure to abolish the requirement to state “Jewish” on immigration forms, and in 1952 a major campaign was waged by the Anti-Defamation League and the American Jewish Committee against the McCarran-Walter Act because it sought to restore this requirement. This act was in the event passed over President Truman’s veto, but even a rigorous application of the reinstated requirement would not lead to clarification, as applicants, if they wish, may insert “British” or any similar description, instead of “Jewish.”

This state of statistical affairs is now well-nigh universal, so that the whole question is a mystery and has deliberately been made one. None can even guess the number of Jews whose deaths, during the war, were not natural or the result of bombing and the like, but who were done to death by the Nazis. My opinion is that, whatever was the number of Jews in the countries overrun by Hitler, the number of their victims was in roughly that proportion to the total population stricken, Polish, Czech and other. I have found this to be the opinion of all persons known to me who survived the concentration camps and occupations. Having suffered themselves, their feeling for Jewish victims was as strong as for all others, but they could not understand why the one case of the Jews was singled out and the number of Jewish victims monstrously exaggerated.
——-

Filed Under: "Jewish" holocaust, 6 Million Myth, Douglas Reed, Editor's Zone, HOLODOMOR, Jewish Holocaust Industry, Jewish Holocaust Lie, Jewish Media Monopoly, Jews, Jews Behind Bolshevik Revolution, National Socialism, Nazis, Nuremberg Trial, Political Zionism, The Controversy of Zion, The Gulag Archipelago, The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion

The Real Terror is the Law by John Kaminski

April 28, 2013 by admin Leave a Comment

The Real Terror is the Law

Hear the chant of the mindless monster — ‘USA! USA!’

NOW YOU CAN BE EXECUTED
FOR MERELY BEING A SUSPECT

By John Kaminski
pseudoskylax@gmail.com
https://therebel.org/kaminski

One thing is certain. It is the cops who are committing the crimes.

In the name of terror, they brutalize the public with concocted fantasies and real episodes of self-destructive social sadism.

And in the name of national security, they mislead everyone into believing that crimes are being committed when in reality the cops are creating the crimes themselves, staging “drills” that turn into live events, hiring “crisis actors” to pose as victims, and feeding false information to media maggots ever eager to fan the flames of fear.

Now you can be executed — as we have just learned — for merely being a suspect — with no evidence, no trial, and no finding of guilt, but only by the hysteria generated by the false testimony of the cops amplified and spread throughout the world by corrupt media.

This is how the recently enacted National Defense Authorization Act works in real time.

The cops can commit constant perjury and remain immune from prosecution because the legal system, totally awash in corruption, protects them, while the gullible public, believing what they hear on TV, puts their hands across their hearts and chants “USA USA” without ever really comprehending the deeper reality of what is going on.

This is the new anthem signifying uncritical endorsement of fear and criminal behavior wherever it is heard — “USA! USA!”

It is a blood libel against all of humanity. No one is safe from it, not even the people practicing it for a paycheck nor the social strategists inventing it for purposes of control.

The cops are supposed to protect us, but their mission has curdled. They have turned the law into a weapon of mass murder.

Now, everyone is a criminal and you’re guilty until proven innocent. Babies are being snatched from their parents for not submitting their newborns to poisoned vaccinations. The new Gov. Cuomo in New York has just signed a law that all psychiatric records are now the property of the government.

There is no longer any such thing as doctor-patient confidentiality, which means your life is no longer your own.

Now, they’re creating crimes rather than fighting them, just as doctors now create diseases rather than eliminating them. Can you say “swine flu shot” without choking on the phrase?

Now, when you go to a doctor, you are committing a crime against yourself, by jeopardizing your own freedom by challenging new laws that spawn the real terror in the world. Our demonic President Obama has pontificated that he can kill anyone he wants without a trial at any time for any reason. The day has already arrived when people, especially parents, are being put in jail for refusing vaccines. How much worse can it get?

Be certain that it will.

Some people don’t care. Others are simply not capable of understanding.

The rest of us who are aware to one degree or another endlessly troll the Internet for each new depravity, wondering in astonishment how we could have sunk so far so fast, how we could have permitted all these evil actions and trends to flourish, and grow progressively worse with each passing day.

It’s no exaggeration to say the future of America and the world hangs in the balance. It is the people who don’t care who control the fate of the world.

Those who will decide whether we all live or die are people who really don’t want to know the truth, who don’t care whether the government is killing its own citizens, who just want to be left alone with their addictions, compulsions, and delusions, with their favorite TV shows and self-destructive jobs.

Those who just want to watch football, go shopping, and eat pizza.

Preaching to the choir doesn’t work. It only sinks those of us who are aware more deeply into depression and frustration. Too many of us now realize it is the people who don’t care who matter most. It is up to us to convince them, and we haven’t.

Convince them of what?

That the information they receive shapes their lives, and prejudices every decision they make in their lives with deliberately falsified facts.

The question of freedom in the minds of Americans hangs on the question of whether or not the U.S. government is killing its own citizens to achieve total control of everyone’s mind, thereby eliminating the possibility of dissent. TV news is shaped to the same purpose.

The notion of freedom in America precariously teeters on the question of whether the government is deliberately killing its own citizens to achieve the goals of the rich power brokers.

People who stock up on guns, bulk food and ham radios are just fooling themselves. You can’t win a firefight with the American war machine. And you can’t survive with any degree of health amid a society that has gone totally rancid.

The lady who lost her legs on Boylston Street doesn’t know about Waco. But no lady lost her legs in the staged Boston Marathon massacre. IT WAS A DRILL. She was an amputee hired as a crisis actor, and she did her job well. What a thrill it must be to know she helped the cops make everybody more afraid.

What a sick society. This is the ultimate outcome of not paying attention to the forces who control our lives. This is what happens when we let someone else usurp responsibility for our own lives.

Reality has separated into two parts. It has bifurcated into two levels of consciousness, one that thinks and one that doesn’t. One that reacts to made-up terror dramas and cringes in fear, and one that gathers real facts and ineffectually rails against injustice.

The one thing that is never mentioned is the real cause of all the problems. Because it is against the law to be mentioned, the problems never get solved. The problems only get worse. And the true cause is never identified openly.

For the last two decades, terrorist incidents like blown-up buildings and mass shootings at schools have proliferated. These are what has caused the need for “terror drills” in the first place.

In recent days, after alleged mass shootings at Aurora and Sandy Hook, plus the Boston Marathon bombing, numerous courageous writers have diligently uncovered the scams, pointed out the inconsistencies, and chronicled the shifting cover stories.

But, again, conspicuous by its absence has been any mention of the real cause.

The Jewish penetration and subversion of reality.

(I notice with fear and loathing that Jewish writers have pretty much taken over the opposition, providing Jewish solutions to problems created by Jews in the first place.)

Few people have actually noticed that ever since the assassination of President William McKinley way back in the year 1900, the real cause of all these tragic public events throughout the 20th century — the passage of the Federal Reserve Act, the Great Depression, both World Wars, Vietnam, Oklahoma City, 9/11 and the endless succession of terror bombings, the constant attacks and obliteration of the Muslim countries, and most recently the Aurora, Sandy Hook and the Boston Marathon sideshows — have all been devised and carried out by the same evil source — cops trained in Israel and soldiers who act without thinking about their immortal souls.

But this source of endless terror is never mentioned, because this same source controls virtually all public media in the world, controls every aspect of it, in ways we still haven’t completely perceived, such as gangsta rap, free sex and the legalization of drugs.

That source is the Jewish mafia, which has perverted our schools, lobotomized our media, perverted our social institutions through non-profit think tanks, and prostituted our children with poisoned drugs and depraved subversive trends masquerading as personal liberation.

And if you do mention it, you probably don’t get published, unless you’re reading discontented sites like this one, hard to find, marginalized, and ridiculed by people who don’t really know what they’re talking about, yet who insist they do, because they got their information from sources who never mention the magic word.

Lawyers collude against their clients, doctors poison their own patients, teachers fill their students’ minds with crap they know is false — this suicidal course was all created by the Jews, just like the erudite commentators who continue to insist Muslims blew up the Twin Towers, white people have plundered the world and deserve to be offed, and you can live a happy life is you just take this bribe, or take this drug, and forget about the rest of it, because there’s nothing you can do about anyway.

Please notice how all the presidential assistants are Jews, how all the lawyers and doctors who craft new laws that threaten our lives are Jews, and how all elected officials are in thrall to the Jews because that’s the only way they can acquire the loans to get themselves elected.

Please notice how all the people on Wall Street who have stolen trillions from the American people are Jews, who read the news on TV and justify government oppression are Jews, and who draw enormous salaries from the government for jobs that don’t really need to exist are Jews or Jew slaves.

Please notice how any news source that forbids the use of the word “Jew” should never be trusted, because it means they are spouting propaganda that has been screened by the Jews, or at least, by not mentioning them, are generally speaking in fear of the Jews.

And most importantly, please notice how any news source that speaks of terrorists as a genuine entity— and specifically the fictional creation known as Al-Qaeda — is simply vomiting Jewish propaganda, because Al-Qaeda is the false flag creation of Zbigniew Brzezinski, the Mossad, and the CIA, and is now successfully spreading to every corner of the world as EITHER the reason for the need for military action by armies that the Jews control, or as allies against countries that the Jews want to destroy.

Such convenient terrorists they are, used to fight EITHER for us or against us, depending on what the situation demands. In Afghanistan, they were the targets of our bombs; but in Libya, they were the deliverers of our bombs.

It’s the people who don’t care who matter most now, because they are the ones who uncritically believe the hip but misleading jargon they hear on TV and give the government the excuse it needs to continue its slick deceptions that sicken the general public and spread profit-making diseases across the planet.

It’s the people who don’t care who control the fate of the world, and it’s up to us who do care to convince them that they must care, that the real terror is the law, and that the real criminals are our leaders, and the cops who follow their criminal orders. Without the people who don’t care realizing their indifference is leading to our destruction, we are unquestionably doomed to a painful and diseased oblivion.

So if you understand this message, get to work, because only numbers — and I’m talking tens of millions of people demanding the trial and execution of all these killer millionaires who fix elections and avoid paying taxes with overseas bank accounts — can at this late date hope to save our world and our lives.

Get the Jews out of government, out of schools, out of our minds. As Ben Franklin predicted so long ago, our children will curse us in our graves if we let the Jews sabotage and destroy our country, which they have already pretty much accomplished.

But as long as we don’t give up our guns, stop going to doctors, and never trust the Jewish-dominated mainstream media, it’s not too late to stop them.

The key is getting the people who don’t care to understand that the future of humanity — the whole shooting match — depends on them waking up to the sorry fact that they are being systematically robbed and killed by organizations that are supposed to protect them and make them healthy, but are doing exactly the opposite.

Given the debauched and debilitated condition of the gullible boobs who populate the United States, I concede this is a tall order. Unfortunately, the only alternative is the Jewish program of mass deception and extermination that is already well under way, and has been for at least a hundred years.
__________

John Kaminski is a writer who lives on the Gulf Coast of Florida, constantly trying to figure out why we are destroying ourselves, and pinpointing a corrupt belief system as the engine of our demise. Solely dependent on contributions from readers, please support his work by mail: 6871 Willow Creek Circle #103, North Port FL 34287 USA.

https://therebel.org/kaminski
http://johnkaminski.info/
http://www.rudemacedon.ca/kaminski/kam-index.html
http://web.archive.org/web/20040323232319/http://johnkaminski.com/

Filed Under: 'Al Qaeda', 911, American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), Anti-Defamation League (ADL), B'nai Brith International, Barack Obama, Boston Marathon bombing, Editor's Zone, Free Speech on the Internet, Hate Crime laws, Israeli Terrorism, Israeli War Crimes, Jewish Crime, Jewish Hatred, Jewish Holocaust Lie, Jewish Lobby Groups, Jewish Media Monopoly, Jewish power, Jewish Racism, Jewish Supremacism, Jewish Terrorists, Jews, Jews Behind Bolshevik Revolution, John Kaminski, League for Human Rights of B'nai Brith Canada, Mossad, Oklahoma City bombing, Rothschild Banking syndicate, Rothschild Zionist Criminal Cartel, The Babylonian Talmud, The Controversy of Zion, The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, The Synagogue of Satan, Wall Street, World Zionist Organization, Zbigniew Brzezinski, Zionist Atrocities

The Trial of Guenter Deckert by Sylvia Stolz (English translation by Christine B. Miller)

April 26, 2013 by admin 1 Comment

The Trial of Guenter Deckert

By Sylvia Stolz

Translated from the German language
by Christine Miller

“A prison sentence will not force me into believing.”
~ Guenter Deckert

“When I have doubts I demand the right to express them …They talk about tolerance, but mean the inquisition. … The hunt to find incorrect literature pretending to fight crime. For a short time people can be intimidated by the threat of punishment, but the brain continues to reason.”

Thus spoke Guenter Deckert in his final comment at his sentencing February, 2012 in front of the state court Mannheim. The report of his trial follows.

Since January 2, 2013 Guenter has been in prison on account of aiding and abetting so-called Holocaust denial. We accompanied him on his journey to prison and took leave of him at the Mannheim prison gate.

We expressed our thanks for his courage and his commitment to freedom, justice and truth. We will always remember that. The day will come when the Germans and other people will appreciate his zeal.

He is supposed to be released May 2013. We will be there waiting for him starting at nine o’clock.
Address: Herzogenriedstrasse 111, 68169 Mannheim. Whoever wants to be there and greet him is cordially invited.

The Opinion Terror

By Sylvia Stolz

A prison sentence for doubting the “Holocaust.”

No probation for expressing one’s opinion in these times of alleged “right wing terror.”

In these times of the “resurfacing” of right wing extremism which, without question, is due to the criminal deeds of the alleged “NSU”, Holocaust denial constitutes a considerable danger for public peace.

Guenter Deckert, former high school teacher, on February 2, 2012 was sentenced by the state court of Mannheim to a prison sentence of six months without probation on account of aiding and abetting so-called Holocaust denial. As well, because of the “radical” law and in spite of high evaluations he was dismissed from his high school teaching job in November, 1988 in the State of Baden-Wuertenberg and was denied his pension.

He is charged with having cooperated in the translation into German of the book by Carlo Mattogno, Auschwitz – the First Gassings, Rumors and Reality (December, Castle Hill Publishers.)

On July 28, 2010 Guenter Deckert had been sentenced by the lower court of Weinheim to a prison term of 4 months with probation. The charges were: promotion of incitement of the public by means of Holocaust denial and defamation of the memory of the dead. (&&130 III, IV, 189 STGB-BRD. Aktenzeichen: 2Ds 503 Js 14219/08 – AK 579/09).

The prosecutor appealed and on February 2, 2012 the sentence by the state court of Mannheim was increased to six months without probation. Guenter Deckert’s appeal was thrown out (Aktenzeichen: 12Ns 503 Js 14219/08)

Many people in the BRD (Germany), the BRO (Austria), Switzerland, France, Spain, Greece and other countries have been sentenced because they denied or doubted the Holocaust when defined as systematic genocide. At times very high prison sentences have been handed down. For example the sentence against lawyer Horst Mahler.

The Holocaust is not defined

During his appeal Guenter Deckert wanted to know the concrete facts which he, according to the accusations, deliberately ignored and the truth he contested. He received no answer.

It is especially telling that the so-called “Holocaust” is not legally defined (This is against the principal of the penal law). In the first trial no concrete facts as to the place of the crime, the methods of killing or other proofs, directly or indirectly presented in the findings of other trials, were presented.

Concerning his denial the court pointed to &130 section 3StGB , &6 section of the international penal law which defines genocide as being when a member of an ethnic or religious group is killed with the intent to destroy or partially destroy the whole group. According to &130 section 3StGB i.V.m &6 section VStGB people can be punished who deny that under the rule of National Socialism, without knowledge or intent of the German Reichsregierung, a Jew, by someone or another (even by a none German), had been killed with the intent to partially destroy Jewry as an ethnic and religious group.

“Known to the court” to be challenged”

Guenter Deckert at the beginning of his appeal made the following motion:

“I move for the court to discuss point by point the principles on which the court rests its “known to the court” facts which, since the beginning of the Seventies of the Twentieth Century, generally go under the notation “Holocaust.”

The court should establish if and how far the persons who are called to judge have knowledge of these “facts” or only base their judgment on hearsay or secondary literature.”

Before coming to a decision about this motion the court should take into consideration the resolution by the petition caucus of the German Bundestag (upper house) Pet 12-4-07-45-5699 Deutscher Bundestag 12. election period – print 12/2849.

An excerpt: During a main trial the court is duty bound to discuss those facts of which the court has taken judicial notice in order to give the accused the opportunity to contest them. In addition it has to be acknowledged that “known to the court” does need to exist in perpetuity or has to remain unchanged. New information might have been gotten and new events might have happened which will bring about a different conclusion. If the accused presents such circumstances which in the past have not been mentioned or discussed the “known to the court” can be challenged and new proofs concerning these facts have to be considered. In this way the accused and his defender have the possibility to counter “it is known to the court.”

The decision concerning “it is “known to the court” & 244 lies therefore exclusively in the hands of the court in question and is subject to the principle of independence in respect to judges. It is also possible that in individual cases a different judgment may be the result.”

Judgment based on the media

Concerning “it is known to the court” the following decisions have been made: (…)

The county court Bernau presided over by the female judge Kroh rejected the motion to discuss the principles of “known to the court,” stating that the facts and the legal situation were the same. She simply gave judicial notice that during the National Socialist (NS) period, the genocide of the Jews in gas chambers located in the concentration camps happened.

The 3. Senate of the Bavarian state court rejected the motion concerning “the Holocaust is a fact, known to the court” with the pronouncement that it does not have any doubts as to the reality of the Holocaust, referring to the accessible and common information in words, pictures, and sound. (decision 1/14/2011, Bay AGH II – 27/09). The motion of the defense to challenge which material the senate based its certainty of “known to the court” was denied citing material in newspapers, on TV, in reference and history books (decision 2/8/2011).

The judiciary degrades itself to a grotesque caricature if it bases its judgments on the media and TV. Judiciary contains the word justice. It does not deserve its name.

No actual facts

It is worthy of notice that the so-called Holocaust is not legally defined and facts are avoided. In & 130 StGB-BRD which is used to convict “Holocaust deniers” the so-called Holocaust is not defined. It is not even mentioned.

The sentencing of Guenter Deckert in the first instance at the local court in Weinheim contains no determination of the crime of “Holocaust denial”. In other words there is no determination of the Holocaust in regard to the place of the crime, the methods of killing, the number of the dead, the time frame, the perpetrators, the bodies, no deposition taken of the witnesses, no proof of the intent by National Socialism to completely or partially exterminate the Jews. There is no determination about decisions, planes, orders or documents not even in the form of references to other judicial sentences.

In addition there is no determination of the knowledge the accused had, or is supposed to have had, or must have had, or could have had.

As long as the courts do not name the location on which the mass murder was suppose to have happened; as long as the courts do not describe how the killing was done; as long as the courts do not mention any proofs; a judgment that mass murder has occurred is not possible. The same is the case for “it is known to the court.”
Without submitting proof as to actual facts a sentencing for Holocaust denial is not valid.

Without the determination of what knowledge of the so-called Holocaust the accused had or could have had, the charge that he acted against his better knowledge is void.

If the above mentioned points are not addressed a sentencing for the denial of the Holocaust is arbitrary and a corruption of the law.

A defense is not possible

The refusal by the judiciary to bring up for discussion the principle of “it is known to the court that the holocaust happened” makes any defense impossible. Not knowing the concrete facts on which the accusation is based emasculates the defense. The law used to sentence an accused without the defense being able to challenge “it is known to the court” defeats the ends of the law.

“The Holocaust as fact is known to the court.” Which facts however the court knows are not stated.

For example: Dr. Martin Broszart, director for the federal Institute fuer Zeitgeschichte published the following: “Neither in Dachau, nor in Bergen-Belsen, nor in Buchenwald were Jews or other inmates gassed.” (Die Zeit, 8/19/1960, p 16). On the other hand there are publications which talk about the gassings in Dachau, Bergen-Belsen and Buchenwald. Which of the two is, according to the judiciary, “…known to the court?” Is it “known to the court” that inmates were gassed at Dachau, Bergen-Belsen and Buchenwald, or is it “… known to the court” that nobody was gassed at Dachau, Bergen-Belsen and Buchenwald? Both cannot be “… known to the court.”

An entire event such as the so-called “Holocaust” can only be undisputed (facts known to the court) when the individual events are undisputed (facts known to the court).

The history Professor Dr. Gerhard Jagschitz of the Institute for Contemporary History at the University of Vienna wrote the following expert opinion: “Substantial doubts about the trials in question have been raised by the presentation of expert opinions to national and international courts. The relentless repetition of judgments using “ facts known to the court,” namely that the Jews were killed by gas in the concentration camp of Auschwitz, will not be enough on which to base sentencing in a democratic nation which is supposed to be founded on justice and right.” (letter to the state court Vienna, 1/10/l991, AZ:26b Vr 14 184/86)

The Ruhr –Nachrichten (Bochum) No. 277 (11/29/2005) printed a citation by the Israeli writer and musician Gilad Atzmon: “The historiography known to us about WWII and the Holocaust is a complete falsification initiated by the Americans and Zionists.”

Is the Holocaust indisputably “a fact known to the court” or is it indisputably “a fact known to the court” that the Holocaust is frequently challenged and therefore can not be “a fact known to the court?”

It is therefore illogical to call a certain alleged historical event which is frequently contested as “a fact known to the court”, a concept which the authorities then use to persecute and penalize the “deniers.”

Abuse of procedural rights

After reading the motion Guenter Deckert wanted to know what he has to accept as “facts known to the court.” The prosecutor, Andreas Grossmann replied (11/14). “That you will find out during sentencing.” During the sentencing however nothing was said.

The chairman, Ross, decreed to postpone the decision concerning the motion. He said: first principles have to be established. Prosecutor Grossmann remarked (January 13, 2012) that the motion only will be dealt with after the pleading. The purpose became obvious when (January 13, 2012) the motion was denied. In the meantime Guenter Deckert took up his case again. In order to show that the “facts are known to the court” must be fully discussed he described in detail circumstances and facts which made him doubt the “Holocaust.” For example he mentioned Dr. Benedikt Kautzky who, for seven years, was in German concentration camps among others, in Auschwitz-Birkenau, and who wrote that in no camp did he ever see a gas chamber.

The chamber denied the motion to discuss “facts are known to the court“ (chairman – Roos, jurors-Wolfgang W. and Helmut M.) using, among other arguments, the reason, “the Holocaust defined as mass killings of Jews especially in the gas chambers of the concentration camps during WWII is “a fact known to the court” (January 13, 2012). The Holocaust as historical event is considering evidence beyond discussion.”

“The facts are known to the court” is not to be discussed because “the facts are known to the court” is a circular argument incompatible with logic and beyond reason and the principles of justice.

The resolution goes on to accuse Guenter Deckert of abusing procedural rights. The need for proofs is not applicable since Guenter Deckert’s demands in that regard, during the main trial, are only designed to involve the court in order to spread his revisionist ideas. This is obvious from his presentation in which he declared that “facts known to the court” needs to be discussed.

According to the court it is an abuse of the justice system when an accused, before being sentenced, tries to move the court to examine the facts of which he is accused.

The resolution furthermore implies that the chamber considers the discussion which forms the basis of the accusation as “court research” to which the accused is not entitled.

The court in this resolution has obviously ignored the laws of reason.

On one hand the court looks at the motion to discuss “the Holocaust, a fact known to the court” (contrary to what Guenter Deckert has said) as a move for proof, on the other hand, in contradiction to this, as a motion to obtain “court research”. The motion however implies neither one nor the other.

Historical facts are deliberately ignored

The resolution further states that Guenter Deckert deliberately ignores historical facts and obstinately refuses to accept the truth.

Reacting to the resolution (January 13, 2012) Guenter Deckert moved (February 2, 2012) that the chamber communicate the following:

According to the court’s knowledge “the ‘Holocaust’ is a fact” in which concentration camps and gas chambers existed.

According to the court’s knowledge in what ways did additional killings take place?

According to its knowledge what were the number of victims?

According to the court’s opinion which facts of the so-called Holocaust have I ignored and accepted?

Since the prosecutor and the court have not produced any facts in regard to the accusation I cannot know which facts I supposedly ignore.

I made the motion to discuss the principles of the “Holocaust is a fact known to the court” in order to be able to defend myself against the accusation of Holocaust denial. I stated in detail that the court is duty bound to discuss their determination that the “Holocaust is a fact known to the court.”

In addition I have pointed out that there is no concrete definition of the so-called Holocaust.

Furthermore no determination has been made about which knowledge of the so-called Holocaust I had or was supposed to have had or could have had.

In the resolution of January 13, 2012 the so-called decision does not contain any determination to the circumstances and “it is known to the court,” nor are there any references.

Without defining the deed in question a sentencing for Holocaust denial is not possible.

Without determining which concrete knowledge the accused had about the so called “Holocaust”, or could have had, an accusation to have acted against his better knowledge is void, and therefore a sentencing for denying the truth is not possible.

What is “fact known to the court”

During my argument I presented facts which show that there is a need for a discussion about “fact known to the court.”

“Known to the court” are historical facts which by means of historical research are considered proven and everybody therefore without specific knowledge can inform himself from history books, encyclopedia and similar reference books (Alsberg/Nuesse/Meyer, proof in a trial, 5. edition, Carl Heymanns publishing house, Berlin 1983, p.539.

The acceptance of “the fact is known to the court” rests on the preliminary condition that the fact is not challenged (vglAlsber/Nuesse/meyer, a.a.O., p. 568.

If however in historiography the truth of an event is contested it does not become accepted knowledge just because much has been written about it and disseminated (Alsberg/Nuesse/Meyer, a.a.O.,P. 540).

In my motion to discuss “the Holocaust happened is known to the court” I cited examples of publications, especially non revisionist publications which prove that the Holocaust historiography is not in agreement, does not speak with one voice, is not unchallenged, and contradicts itself. The Holocaust therefore cannot be claimed as “a fact known to the court.”

A sentencing for denying the Holocaust on the basis of “the Holocaust is known to the court” is therefore not possible. I made the motion not in order to spread revisionism, as maintained by the chamber, but for the simple reason that I have been accused of Holocaust denial and that I want to use my right to defend myself.

To dismiss my motion because I intended for the court to deal with “the Holocaust is known to the court” is arbitrary. Before sentencing it is an essential duty and the task of the court to deal with the underlying facts.

It is factually and judicially not understandable why in a trial for Holocaust denial a motion is supposed to be abusive which is meant to bring clarity in regard to “a fact known to the court.”

“Fact known to the court” is in need of discussion

When a French historian, Jacques Baynac, a proponent of the Holocaust writes that for the existence of the Nazi gas chambers only the lack of documents, traces and other material proofs can be confirmed (Le Noveau Quotidien de Lausanne, Switzerland , September 2, l996, p.16 and September 3/l996, p.14) then this means that there is a need to discuss “the Holocaust is known to the court.”

Michel de Bouaerd, professor for history and dean of the faculty for the Arts and Sciences at the University of Caen (Normandy) states that the documentation concerning the Holocaust is rotten, that the documentation about the system of the German concentration camps is permeated by a mass of invented stories, relentless repetitions of falsifications, especially in regard to numbers, and confusion and generalizations (Ouest-France v. 2-3 August l986, p. 6). This again proves that there is a need to discuss “the Holocaust is known to the court.”

Historian Professor Ernst Nolte seconds the need for a discussion of “fact known to the court. “The testimony of witnesses rests to a large part on hearsay and mere surmises; the testimony of the few eyewitness are in part contradictory and create doubts in regard to their veracity.”

The director of the Yad Vashem memorial, Shmuel Krakowski, in the same vain states (Jerusalem Post, August 17, l986): “Most of the 20,000 witnesses’ testimony concerning the Holocaust are unbelievable, falsified, cannot be verified, or in other ways are not true.”

On January 13, 2012 during a pause in the proceedings (around 16:30) the chairman Ross directed the following words to me: “You would be surprised at the knowledge of history by the jurors.” But judges have to make an unencumbered decision, based on their conviction which they formed during the proceedings in question (& 261 StPO). In addition “facts known to the court” in order to be useable have to be introduced during the main trial in order to give the participants the opportunity to take a position.

It would therefore be useful if the members of the chamber would reveal their knowledge of history to the accused before they convict him on the basis of this knowledge.

If not it will remain obscure on which facts the members of chamber base their views. It (the Holocaust) is supposed to be a wrong removed from common categories and therefore &130 StGB is an exception to the prohibition of having a special law. (motion of cessation of the trial on account of the special law & 130 which is contrary to the German basic law. The motion was denied January 13, 2012)

Permanent misjudgment

The chamber misrepresents my motion. It considers it a motion for proof which is obvious from their choice of words. “The chamber is supposed to furnish proof,” “makes proof unnecessary.” “proof is also inadmissible,” “a motion for proof is inadmissible (p.2 of the resolution).”

But it is unequivocally clear that the motion was not a motion for proof.

The motion to discuss the principle of “the Holocaust, a fact known to the court” does not mean, that the Holocaust did not happen (p. 2 of the resolution), but was a motion to examine the facts on which “fact known to the court” are based.

The chamber maintains that I contested “facts known to the court.” The chamber is mistaken. I did not contest facts, but demanded the discussion of facts.

What is a circular argument?

A circular argument is to deny the motion for discussion of the principle of “fact known to the court” with the argument that a discussion is not necessary since the Holocaust is “a fact known to the court.” (p.2 of the resolution.)

The chamber misunderstands not only the meaning of a “circular argument,” but also the concept of “an established fact known to the court.” What is frequently contested can’t be “an established fact known to the court” since “an established fact known to the court” is defined as undisputed, unchallenged (see above).

It is a circular argument if I would say “the holocaust is not “a fact known to the court” because “it is not known to the court.” It is, however, not a circular argument if I say: “the Holocaust is not fact known to the court” because “known to the court” is equivalent to conformity and indisputability. The historiography of the Holocaust is not in conformity and is not unchallenged. The resolution stated by the chamber shows a lack of capacity to reason.

It is inconsequential if it happened or not

My motion of January 13, 2012 in which I stated that the incriminating book is scientifically correct was denied. The following reason was given: It does not matter if the book is scientifically correct. I am guilty since I assisted in the formation of the book.

It looks as if the chamber agrees with the view of the Mannheim court who convicted Ernst Zuendel. “It does not matter if the Holocaust did or did not take place.” The “tageszeitung (February 9, 2007, p.6)” writes about the Zuendel trial: “At the end the court denied all the motions with the lapidary reason (a shock to some of the antifascists among the audience): “It does not matter one wit if the Holocaust did or did not take place. Its denial is punishable under German law. Only this is what counts.”

Paul Fromm on the Demise of Free Speech in Canada by Prof. Kevin MacDonald

April 18, 2013 by admin Leave a Comment

http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2013/04/paul-fromm-on-the-demise-of-free-speech-in-canada/
Paul Fromm on the Demise of Free Speech in Canada

By Kevin MacDonald
April 13, 2013

Paul Fromm, a pro-White activist who writes for his CAFE (Canadian Association for Free Expression) website, has an article on a recent ruling by the Canadian Supreme Court that once again indicates the power of the cultural left at the highest reaches of Western societies “The Whatcott Decision – A Grim Day for Christians and Freedom of Speech“). The case involves a $15000 fine (plus court costs likely to be north of $150,000) imposed on an evangelical Christian who distributed leaflets containing criticism of homosexuality based on Biblical teachings.

Some excerpts and comments:

The decision is pure cultural Marxism. It reflects the triumph of *Frankfurt School* social science which has captured most Western universities. While economic communism collapsed and was defeated, cultural communism was spread by the *Frankfurt School*. Basically, it sees the world divided up into two classes: oppressors – those would be White Christians, and especially sexually healthy White males – and the oppressed – those would be women, homosexuals, Jews, and certain other racial minorities. To overthrow the “oppressors” and to establish universal equality – not of opportunity but results – the *Frankfurt School* targeted loyalty to family, country and religion. There began a concerted campaign of “deconstruction” whereby political heroes, cultural heroes – the dismissal of traditional English literature as the writing of dead, White males – and traditional Christianity were mocked and attacked. These ideas have captured the upper echelons of Canada’s judiciary and bode poorly for freedom of speech.

The Whatcott decision holds that in human rights cases:

· Truth is no defence;?

· Intent is no defence;?

· No harm needs to be proven to have been caused to a “vulnerable” minority;

· A minority is designated as “vulnerable” not because of any evidence – the court admits concrete evidence is often lacking, but on the mere say-so of a human rights commission or court;

· Christians are not protected from hatred as they are not a “vulnerable minority.”

The Court depicts Mr. Whatcott as having the power to intimidate homosexuals. The reality is far different:

Well, where’s the evidence that in the decade since Mr. Whatcott handed out his flyers critical of homosexuals, that “dialogue” was shut down and homosexuals were unable to respond? For nearly 20 years, the powerful homosexual lobby has been pushing for same sex marriage – a revolutionary anti-family retreat from tradition. In 2001, Parliament overwhelmingly voted to endorse the traditional definition of marriage – one man and one woman. The lobby continued its pressure, apparently not intimidated or silenced by the lonely Mr. Whatcott’s leafleting. A cowardly Jean Chretien referred the “question” as to whether the traditional definition of marriage, accepted by almost all but the fringiest elements of Christianity, and by Judaism, Islam, and Hinduism, was “discriminatory” to the judicial revolutionaries on the Supreme Court. They collapsed and gave the homosexual lobby what it wanted. Canada has same-sex marriage.

Despite being a Catholic, Liberal Premier Dalton McGuinty of Ontario forced even Catholic schools to promote the homosexual agenda in the schools and have Gay-Straight Alliance Clubs, even though the practice of homosexuality violates Catholic teaching. (So much for religious freedom!) The homosexual agenda has triumphed in almost every battle. It successfully pressured to have “sexual orientation” added to the privileged groups protected by Sec. 319 of the Criminal Code, Canada’s notorious “hate law.” In fact, there’s no evidence that Mr. Whatcott’s pathetic little leafleting operation ever intimidated any homosexual from promoting his cause. The only one excluded from the debate is Mr. Whatcott! Mr. Whatcott and strong critics of the homosexual agenda are all but excluded from the mainstream media. Pro-homosexual commentators bray their views from the CBC and the Globe and Mail is virtually a mouthpiece for the homosexual lobby. The only voices marginalized are critics of the homosexual agenda.

Fromm targets the Frankfurt School, a Jewish intellectual movement discussed in Chapter 5 of The Culture of Critique:

Despite calling themselves a “School of Social research,” the Frankfurt School feared any objective research that might challenge their ideology. Like the Supreme Court, they defined the world ideologically, and facts would not be allowed to get in the way:

The Frankfurt School never set out to find out the truth about human behavior and institutions. Instead, its members viewed empirically oriented social science as an aspect of domination and oppression. Horkheimer wrote in 1937 that “if science as a whole follows the lead of empiricism and the intellect renounces its insistent and confident probing of the tangled brush of observations in order to unearth more about the world than even our well-meaning daily press, it will be participating passively in the maintenance of universal injustice.” Rather than find out how society works, the social scientist must be a critic of culture and adopt an attitude of resistance toward contemporary societies.

The unscientific nature of the enterprise can also be seen in its handling of dissent within the ranks of the Institute—a trend that is a common feature of Jewish intellectual and political movements Erich Fromm was excised from the movement in the 1930s because his leftist humanism opposed the authoritarian nature of the psychoanalyst-patient relationship. This was not compatible with the pro-Bolshevik stance championed at the time by the Horkheimer-Adorno line: Fromm “takes the easy way out with the concept of authority,without which, after all, neither Lenin’s avant-garde nor dictatorship can be conceived of. I would strongly advise him to read Lenin…I must tell you that I see a real threat in this article to the line which the journal takes. (See Chapter 5 of The Culture of Critique.)

One of the most shocking revolutionary conclusions of the Court is that truth should not be a defence, at least in human rights cases: “The lack of defences is not fatal to the constitutionality of the provision. Truthful statements can be presented in a manner that would meet the definition of hate speech, and not all truthful statements must be free from restriction. …

Fromm emphasizes the Jewish role in this decision:

Finally, and this is a delicate topic in oppressive, minority-ruled Canada, let’s look at the makeup of the six judge panel who heard this crucial case about the rights of Christians. Three, yes three, or fully one half of the panel were Jews. Under the regime of employment equity, a Canadian version of anti-White “affirmative action”, invented by, guess who? Madame Justice Rosalie Silberman Abella, who was on the panel, “systemic discrimination” is evidenced by an over-representation or under-representation of a group. It must be remembered that Jews, at about 310,000, constitute less than one per cent of Canada’s population, but made up half of panel in Whatcott! Did their personal views interfere? Ironically, had Justice Abella applied her own “employment equity” she’d have removed herself from the panel in Whatcott as her minority was already heftily over-represented.

The author of this freedom trashing opinion was Mr. Justice Marshall Rothstein of Manitoba. His biography on the Supreme Court website notes: “He served as an adjudicator under the Manitoba Human Rights Act from 1978 to 1983 and as a member of the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal from 1986 to 1992.” In other words, he was, for more than a decade, part of the whole repressive “human rights” industry he was now being invited to critique. In his case, there was more than a “reasonable apprehension of bias.” Perhaps, no surprise he found state censorship and strong criticism of privileged minorities perfectly justified in a “free” [do words mean nothing!] and “democratic society.”

At least two Liberal senators, Robina Jaffer and Jim Munson (a former journalist happily at ease with state censorship), in speaking against Bill C-304, which would repeal Sec. 13 (Internet censorship) of the Canadian Human Rights Act quoted Justice Abella and her emphasis on“vulnerable minorities”: to wit: “In a 2009 speech entitled Human Rights and History’s Judgment, Justice Rosalie Abella said: We were supposed to have learned three indelible lessons from the concentration camps of Europe. First, indifference is injustice’s incubator. Second, it’s not just what you stand for, it’s is what you stand up for. And third, we must never forget how the world looks to those who are vulnerable.’” Justice Abella was also part of the human rights industry having served on the Ontario Human Rights Commission. Her biography on the Supreme Court website notes: “She married Canadian historian Irving M. Abella on December 8, 1968.” Irving Abella is a past president of the Canadian Jewish Congress, a pro-censorship intervener in Whatcott. The CJC has been a long-time and strident supporter of anti-free speech “hate laws”. Again, one might wonder why Justice Abella did not recuse herself from this case is there is more than a “reasonable apprehension of bias.”

It is certainly true that the organized Jewish community has been a strong voice supporting laws curtailing free speech, not just in Canada, but throughout the Western world (see “The Hate Crimes Prevention Bill: Why Do Jewish Organizations Support It?“). Irving Abella’s book was cited in my chapter on the Jewish role in promoting immigration. Although the chapter emphasizes the Jewish role in altering U.S. immigration policy in favor of non-Whites, the Jewish community played a similar role throughout the West, including Canada:

In the case of Canada, Abella (A Coat of Many Colors: Two Centuries of Jewish Life in Canada; 1990, 234–235) notes the important contribution of Jews in bringing about a multicultural Canada and, in particular, in lobbying for more liberal immigration policies. Reflecting this attitude, Arthur Roebuck, attorney general of Ontario, was greeted “with thunderous applause” at a 1935 convention for the Zionist Organization of Canada [dedicated to a Jewish ethnostate] when he stated that he looked “forward to the time when our economic conditions will be less severe than they are today and when we may open wide the gates, throw down the restrictions and make of Canada a Mecca for all the oppressed peoples of the world” (in M. Brown 1987, 256).

Abella also co-authored a book, None Is Too Many that was critical of Canada for not admitting Jewish refugees in the World War II era. The title comes from a statement of a senior Canadian immigration official that summed up Canadian policy.

Thus we have Jewish activists involved in academic research on Jewish issues. And perhaps more importantly, Jewish activists are involved in court decisions that reflect consensus views within the Jewish community on issues related to free speech, multiculturalism, and immigration. The hostile elite in action.

—–

Filed Under: "hate speech", "Jewish" holocaust, Abrams/BBC v. Arthur Topham & RadicalPress.com, Anti-Defamation League (ADL), B'nai Brith Canada, BC HATE CRIME TEAM, Bill C-304, Bill Whatcott, C.B.C./Canadian Broadcasting Corp., CAFE - Canadian Association for Free Expression, Canada's Queer Community, Canadian Catholic News, Canadian Charter of Rights & Freedoms, Canadian Council for Israel and Jewish Advocacy (CIJA), Canadian Human Rights Act, Canadian Human Rights Commission, Canadian Human Rights Tribunal, Canadian Jewish Congress, Canadian Jewish Lobby, Canadian Judicial System, Catholic Activists, Catholic Insight magazine, Chabad Lubavich Cult, Conservative Party of Canada, Editor's Zone, Free Speech on the Internet, Freedom of Speech, Globe and Mail, Harry Abrams, Hate Crime laws, Hate laws, Jewish Censorship, Jewish Crime, Jewish Freemasons, Jewish Hatred, Jewish Holocaust Industry, Jewish Lobby Groups, Jewish Media Monopoly, Jewish Racism, Jews, Justice Marshall Rothstein SCC, Kevin MacDonald, League for Human Rights of B'nai Brith Canada, Madame Justice Rosalie Silberman Abella, Marxism, Marxist Frankfurt School, Paul Fromm (CAFE), PM Stephen Harper, Political Zionism, Roman Catholics, Sec. 13(1) CHRA, Sec. 319(2) CC "Willful Promotion of Hatred", The Controversy of Zion, The Holy Bible, The Occidental Observer, The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, Ukrainian Holocaust

Honoring Doug Christie by James Holbeyfield, Counter-Currents Publishing

March 28, 2013 by admin Leave a Comment

http://www.counter-currents.com/2013/03/honoring-doug-christie/

Honoring Doug Christie

James Holbeyfield

Douglas Hewson Christie died on March 11th, 2013 at the age of 66. He was among the greatest defense lawyers of his generation, in Canada or any other country, and his greatness was founded on two piers: courage and honor.

In his eulogy for his father, Doug’s son Cadeyrn has said that his father was meant for the battlefield, and in another age would have fought with sword and shield, but in our age, his battlefield was the courtroom.

This identification of warriors with the best lawyers helps us to understand a major lesson of the way Doug Christie lived his life. It is this: the courage to speak freely and publicly against the powerful, the courage to defend those the powerful deem indefensible, and the courage to face threats to career, home, and family from the tolerated minions of the powerful for the sake of principle; all these are first founded on physical courage.

Doug retained tremendous physical courage right up to the end. Incredibly, less than three weeks before he died, his liver riddled with metastatic cancer and refusing pain-killers, so that his brain and his examinations, would be as famously sharp and focused as ever, he had been in court arguing on behalf of a client. There, he collapsed and was brought to hospital. Even then, his chief desire was to be released so that he could finish that case and get back to another, his ongoing defense of Arthur Topham, who has been charged with promoting hate on the internet.

Sadly, that could not be, and Doug’s final regret was that he was unable to carry on for Mr. Topham, just as his greatest concern since he was diagnosed with cancer in 2011 was that once he was gone, there would be no Canadian lawyer to take his place of prominence in battling the endless attacks on freedom of speech in that fallen dominion. Canada is an Anglosphere country that’s particularly vulnerable to the bizarre new ‘tyranny of tolerance’ because it was founded as a nation, not of rebels so much as of men self-selected for conformity, because those men faced a subsequent requirement for an endless, uneasy truce with the pre-existing French population, and because breakdowns in that truce eventually led, under Pierre Trudeau, to a method for reducing its importance by transforming British Canada into multicultural Canada. Unfortunately, Canada shows every sign of needing more lawyers like Doug Christie going forward. Instead, it has lost the only one it had.

If a successor to Doug is waiting in Canada’s future, he will have large shoes to fill. “Very large shoes indeed,” Father Lucien Larré reminded hundreds of mourners at St. Andrew’s Cathedral in Victoria in officiating at Doug’s funeral, “but we must never stop trying to fill them anyway.”

The reason for the magnitude of the task is straightforward: working as a solo lawyer with a staff of one or two assistants, over the course of three decades Doug Christie defined the legal defense of free speech in Canada. When Doug took on his first free speech case in 1983, that of Alberta high-school teacher James Keegstra when he was fired from his job and charged with willfully promoting hatred by discussing Jewish conspiracies with his students, Canada had had criminal hate laws on the books since the 1960s, but they were dormant. “It was a novel proposition to prosecute people for what they said,” Doug reminded the world. But since Keegstra, it has been used scores of times, and Doug Christie was the backbone of the defense in every landmark case. He argued more free speech cases before the Supreme Court of Canada than anyone. All of this from a tiny, sole proprietorship law practice of a type that has now virtually disappeared.

Doug’s widow, Keltie Zubko, has said that his proudest case, which they worked on so hard together, she as legal assistant, was that of Imre Finta. It remains Canada’s only war crimes trial. Following a two-year investigation, the trial took place in three countries, Canada, Hungary. and Israel, over the course of nine months. The prosecution spent millions. It all resulted in Mr. Finta’s acquittal, without needing to call evidence, principally on the basis of Doug’s cross-examination. The prosecution appealed the case to the Supreme Court of Canada, where Doug argued against it so effectively that Canada has never attempted to prosecute a war crimes case since.

But the enemies of our race and of our heritage of freedom are legion; in hyperborean Canada, perhaps white enemies especially. They have power, and they have time. They are hydra-headed, and when one begins to tire, thoughts turning to sinecure, he is easily replaced by many more, as the unquestioning graduates of the academies multiply. Even the youngest have none of the fire in Doug Christie’s soul, but the whole corpus can afford to watch as the tiny band of defenders withers. Worse, a single hydra increasingly sprawls across many countries, in the form of international law.

This is underlined by the fate of Doug’s best-known client, Ernst Zündel. Doug had guided him through the ups and downs of a welter of trials, tribunals and appeals in the 1980s, leading to eventual success in R. v. Zundel before the Supreme Court of Canada in 1992. But the global enemies of freedom were not to give up. In 2003, the twisted arm of international law reached in among the tens of millions of illegal immigrants in America and plucked Mr. Zündel out of Tennessee for overstaying his legal visa, tore him from his American wife, and brought him back to Canada for two years in solitary confinement while it bided its time. Eventually, Ernst Zündel was deported to Germany, where he was ultimately convicted of holocaust denial in a trial filled with legal misadventures that smacked of the inevitability of religious ritual far more than it resembled anything within the Anglo-Saxon legal tradition. Mr. Zündel spent five more years in prison in Germany, despite everything Doug had tried to do for him in the Canadian phase of this horror.

In such ways as this, the truly heroic war of our time, the war of a tiny number of outcasts to awaken a dispossessed majority, has been transformed. Doug Christie was too busy fighting the battles he could see all around him, one after another in a seemingly endless procession, to devote his great mental incisiveness and physical energy to strategy alone. That is necessarily the way of the hero, of the man who acts. Doug’s great role was in law, not in politics. That was not for lack of trying, and Doug struggled hard within the shrinking opportunities of electoral politics. He never overtly gave up on the political project as a potential solution, but the diminution of his efforts in that direction tells us a lot about the metapolitical nature of our fight today. Actions like his legal battles, and the cultural battle reflected here at Counter-Currents, are the ones we need now.

There is another side to Cadeyrn Christie’s metaphorical tribute to his father as warrior. Doug Christie was a man of principles and a man of honor. That was the yardstick by which he measured every proposal that came to him, whether from others or from within his own creative mind. His whole life was a duel over honor, but not the ferocious intensity of single combat on the Trojan plain; rather tireless, patient resistance.

But the principles are the same. Some men cannot be bought off into slavery, and Doug Christie was the most obvious such man in all the Canada of his generation. All who knew Doug knew he was a man who could have attained early what is considered great success in our world. He was tall, he was good-looking, and he had the manners and blue-eyed charisma of the born leaders of the old American and Canadian West. He was gregarious. People liked him right away and were motivated by him. He had a great legal mind, an appetite and flair for courtroom drama, and the courage to stick out every courtroom battle.

Instead Doug gave of himself unstintingly over many decades to the downtrodden and outcast. He did pro bono work. His friends struggled endlessly to raise money for his cases. He ran his tiny law office on a shoestring.

He lived his whole life the way he had been raised: “we always had enough to eat, but there was never anything left on the table.” He was proud of his Scottish roots in that regard. He drove an old pick-up truck, wore a cowboy hat, and throughout his whole legal career, he earned considerably less each year than can readily be made by skilled tradesmen throughout Western Canada, so long as it remains the prosperous corner of Western civilization that it now is.

Today, the pursuit of money, political approval, and comfort are indeed the chief ways in which a man throws his sword and shield down into the dust. It all happens so gradually that it is vastly more difficult for us to recognize our enslavement than it was for our ancestors. Most men never do, and die with the conceit of freedom.

But even today, some men seem to grasp the real message of our ancestors, almost from earliest youth. Doug Christie was such a man, a true man of honor.

——–

Filed Under: B'nai Brith Canada, BC HATE CRIME TEAM, Caderyn Christie, Canadian Association for Freedom of Speech (CAFE), Canadian Free Speech League, Canadian Human Rights Act, Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Counter-Currents, Doug Christie, Doug Collins, Douglas H. Christie Barrister & Solicitor, Douglas Hewson Christie, Editor's Zone, Ernst Zundel, Father Lucien Larré, Free Speech, Free Speech on the Internet, Freedom of Expression, Freedom of Speech, Freedom of Thought, Harry Abrams, Hate Crime laws, Imre Finta, James Holbeyfield, James Keegstra, Jewish Censorship, Jewish Lobby Groups, Jewish Media Monopoly, Jewish Supremacism, Jim Keegsra, Judaism, Keltie Zubko, League for Human Rights of B'nai Brith Canada, Leo M. Frank, Paul Fromm (CAFE), Political Zionism, RCMP Corruption, Richard Warman, Rothschild Zionist Criminal Cartel, Sec. 13(1) CHRA, Sec. 319(2) CC "Willful Promotion of Hatred", Supreme Court of Canada, Sylvia Stoltz, The Controversy of Zion, The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, The Radical Press, THE ZUNDEL TRIAL & FREE SPEECH, Western Canada Concept, World Zionist Organization

Brave Anti-Zionist & Defender of Human Rights, Doug Christie, Passes at 66

March 12, 2013 by admin Leave a Comment

Mar 12, 2013 |

It greatly saddens my heart to tell you who have not yet heard the news, that my long time friend and legal defender, and friend, Doug Christie, died on March 11, 2013.

Attorney Douglas Christie was truly a great man because he stood up courageously against a powerful, unscrupulous foe. At great cost to himself, his family and his career, he fought to the very end of his life for true human rights and human freedom.

I first met him in the mid-seventies when he fought hard for my right to speak in Canada, and since that time he has defended many anti-Zionist patriots from attempts by the Jewish extremists to imprison them for their non-violent opinions and conscience. Over the years, Ernst Zundel and many others relied on his untiring efforts for true freedom. Many times he worked tirelessly, facing harassment, and even physical threats and attacks to help secure the freedom for those who dared to expose the greatest threat to the freedom of Canadians and all mankind: the Zio supremacists.

I must tell you that my visits with Doug will always remain in my memory as some the high points of my life. He was a man gracious, unselfish, humorous, kind, and absolutely fearless in the face of bestial foe.

He pointed out eloquently that the government officials who seek to kidnap men and women from their families and imprison them for years simply for expressing their non-violent opinions — are the true violators of human rights. It is they who should be in prison not the man who simply speaks his conscience.

The fact that in the European world men and women are being sent to prison, often for years for exercising their inherent human right of free speech and free conscience, is a stain on all of the European people. Doug Christie sacrificed much of his own time and freedom and money to fight for those who had no means to defend themselves before the tyrannical foe.

I am sad to think that he is no longer with us.

But he will remain in our memories and our hearts. He will live on in the work we will do and he will always be an inspiration to those of us devoted to this struggle.

I know that he rests in peace, for no man has given more of his himself, of his life to his people!

May the memory of Doug Christie inspire you for all your days as he inspires me.

Christie stood strong at the sharpest peaks fighting for Human Rights

He faced the tempest, the demons of repression and hate

Their lightning bolts could not deter him

And his words of truth rang out like thunder in return

They shook the enemy, and shook many of our kindred from their sleep

His work is done and now he passes on to Valhalla’s rest

But his spirit with us we shall always keep!

– Dr. David Duke

Filed Under: Canadian Free Speech League, Christianity, David Duke, Doug Christie, Douglas H. Christie, Douglas H. Christie Barrister & Solicitor, Political Zionism, The Controversy of Zion, The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, THE ZUNDEL TRIAL & FREE SPEECH, Zionism

CANADIAN OUTLAWS: Truth, Christians and Free Speech fall prey to Zionist misfeasance by Arthur Topham

March 6, 2013 by admin 4 Comments

CANADIAN OUTLAWS: Truth, Christians and Charter of Rights fall prey to Zionist misfeasance

By Arthur Topham

March 3, 2013

The recent, decision handed down on Wednesday, February 27, 2013 by six of Canada’s Supreme Court justices, in the Saskatchewan (Human Rights Commission) v Whatcott case, was indeed a ‘supreme’ blow to Christians, to freedom of religion and to every individual’s right to freedom of speech in Canada. At the same time, it also was a remarkably clandestine victory for the foreign Zionist-Jew lobby groups such as B’nai Brith Canada, the Canadian Jewish Congress, and the Canadian Council for Israel and Jewish Advocacy (CIJA); all of whom reflect, represent and condone, in unabashed fashion, the principles and policies of the Zionist state of Israel, over and above the traditional rule of law that has been the hallmark of Canadian jurisprudence from its earliest beginnings.

On top of this victorious legal coup that the vast majority of Canadians remain either ignorant of or in denial of, there are the added collaborating players in this long-range agenda to subvert and mould Canada’s judiciary into a type more in keeping with that of the U.S.A’s; one which, in recent years, has become permeated by their Jewish lobby groups to such an extent that they’ve effectively emasculated the US legal system by introducing their own brand of Jewish Noahide laws into American jurisprudence. These Noahide laws are, in fact, ones that stem from the ancient writings of the Jewish Talmud; a horrendously hoary and convoluted compilation of endless sophistry and intellectual meanderings that attempt to cover the full gamut of possible mental masterbation on any conceivable topic capable of debate, all of which boggles the mind and taxes the heart and soul of anyone who is able to locate and delve into the bottomless pit of arcane, abstruse, macabre deliberations found therein.

It is my contention, based upon all recent research and extrapolation, that this same clandestine, Fifth Column Zionist-instigated seditious process is, and has been, occurring here in Canada since the inception of our nation’s “hate speech laws” that, coincidentally, began to gain ascendency in Canada’s house of justice back in the late 1960′s when the major Jewish lobby groups first began to amalgamate and initiate this calculated, step by step, surreptitious program of incremental changes to Canada’s legal system; one that would eventually see the switch over from former Christian democratic principles of freedom of speech to those of the Talmudic Jewish Noahide laws under which Jewry has operated over the past two millennia. It is also my added contention that these subtle changes have been, and are being, spearheaded by those very justices of the Supreme Court of Canada who hold duel citizenship with the state of Israel and whose ultimate allegiance, I strongly allege, is first and foremost to that foreign nation.

Compounding and exacerbating this traitorous intent to corrupt and debase Canada’s legal system via “hate crime legislation” is the growing realization by many Canadians that our so-called “independent” media is, in fact, totally controlled, editorially and otherwise, by this same self-serving Zionist Jew consortium and that these media monopolists, along with their line of sycophantic, sayanim journalists and talking heads, are the major propaganda force behind this plot to subvert the Canadian justice system.

Most Canadians who have not been asleep at the wheel politically are now fully cognizant of the fact that the Harper Conservative government is the key to the success of these Zionist “hate crime” operatives and their eventual triumph in binding the mouths and minds of Canadians so that any and all criticism of their planned take-over of the country will not be openly discussed, either in the print media, television or on the Internet. Their arsenal of epithets stands ready 24/7 to support any smear & fear campaign necessary to belittle and slander and denigrate those who show any indication of not bowing down in obeisance to their treasonous scheme to dismantle and re-create our former legal system so as to have it fit harmoniously with all the other nations that have also been infiltrated by these same self-chosen zealots.

The whole of the homosexual agenda is but one of the ruses that these lobbyists use in order to divide, confuse and conquer their opponents and justify, via their human rights commissions, tribunals and their Supreme Court double-agents, the introduction of more and more repressive anti-democratic “hate speech” laws. These tactics, for those who have studied the Zionist’s modus operandi to any degree, are par for the course. The crucial thing for them is to use others rather than come straight out and say we’re bringing in all these repressive, Orwellian laws because we don’t want Canadians discussing and debating our ideology, our motives or our agenda; one that includes enslaving and punishing anyone who steps out of line and beyond that the total destruction of the Christian religion as we now know it.

There is, on top of all these seemingly inexplicable occurrences, a vital question that needs to asked and addressed with respect to the inordinate number of Zionist, duel-citizenship Jewish justices who have somehow wended their way upwards to the apex of Canada’s judicial system and are now literally in positions of supreme power and control with respect to influencing both our Constitution and our Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

Given that Canada is noted world wide for being a proactive, multicultural nation; one that welcomes immigrants from around the world to its shores and touts itself as being an open, free and culturally diverse society, the blatant imbalance that we are witnessing today in the ethnic composition of our Supreme Court justices is beyond question a problem in dire need of explanation.

Were we, as a nation, to give equal opportunity and consideration to the various visible minorities that make up our country’s population then this ought to be reflected in the composition of those who sit in judgement at the top of our federal judicial system.

Knowing that our First Nations population is the largest minority group in Canada it behooves all Canadians to ask the obvious: why do we not have a First Nations justice sitting in on our supreme court? Given that this nation was formed, literally, from the soil of the original people’s land and also given that the First Nations people constitute the largest group in the Canadian population matrix does it not make sense that when it comes to representing their interests that someone from their ranks ought to be a member of this august group of supreme court justices?

Next in line is our Chinese-Canadian population topping the list as the largest visible minority in Canada and again the obvious question is: why do we not have a Chinese-Canadian justice sitting in the SCC?

Next in line we have a very large South Asian population followed by an equally large black population. Where are the South Asian and the Black supreme court justices?

Finally, getting to the crux of this perplexing situation, as we go down the scale of relative population demographics we come to the ethnic Jewish population in Canada which, according to the Jewish Virtual Library, in 2010 numbered 375,000 in population, ranking somewhere in the neighbourhood of 25th in terms of group size and comprising, out of a total population of 33,890,000 Canadians, 1.1% of Canada’s total population. Yet, for their relatively small numbers in terms of percentages they now hold 4 out of 9 positions on Canada’s Supreme Court. That works out to 44.4% of Canada’s supreme court justices somehow stemming from 1.1 % of the country’s total population. If common sense cannot tell people that there is a glaring discrepancy here then something surely is wrong in the way that Canadians view the make-up of their nation’s highest court. No amount of intellectual verbiage can explain why this is so without getting into the fundamental question of what the real reasons are for this most obvious of imbalances wherein we have a preponderance of duel-citizen Jewish justices sitting and deliberating the vital questions currently being discussed in this brief essay.

Of course the immediate reaction from the Zionist lobbies is to reach up their proverbial sleeve and pull out their “anti-Semitic” and “hate speech” cards and flash them across the nation via their controlled media in typical fashion whenever their power base is questioned or threatened. Then will follow their sophistry and rhetoric emanating from the academics and talking heads arguing that this blatant discrepancy is simply due to the fact that Jewish lawyers are the most intelligent, experienced and therefore qualified of all of Canada’s lawyers and, like the cream atop the cow’s milk, they naturally rise up to those positions of eminence and power.

As the kids would say, “Yah, sure.”

To conclude, it cannot be stressed or repeated enough that we either have free speech or we have controlled speech where Big Brother takes control of our conscience and our mind and leaves us as automatons and slaves to do their bidding and those who now sit in judgement over our collective rights , due to their recent actions in the Whatcott case, must be treated with the utmost suspicion and their motives fully analyzed.

The time to act on these concerns is yesterday. Tomorrow may be too late.

The SCC Puppets

I present below the figures of the three Ashkenazi Zionists who have, along with their controllers in Tel Aviv and elsewhere, and the other three Shabbez Goi justices, perpetrated this seditious act of attempting to twist the truth and our human right to freedom of speech into some form of kosher, Zionist fritter all the better to fragment and confuse the people of Canada so as to lure our nation further astray into the nightmare that awaits the world should Zionism ever gain full control over independent nation states.

It must also be adamantly born in mind as well that the fact that I am presenting and focusing on these three individuals is absolutely not to be misconstrued as having excused the other three protagonists in this deceptive legal drama. The primary purpose here is accent the Jewish lobby in Canad and its unsavory effect upon Canada’s legal system. It goes without saying that the other three justices have, for whatever reasons, also consented to this agenda and ought to be removed from their positions along with the three Zionist duel-citizen justices in question here.

With respect to Canada’s current Madam Chief Justice McLachlin it is also relevant and fitting that the following quote by Jason Moscovitz of the CBC be mentioned here as it is most relevant to an understanding of the mindset of these six judicial side-kicks when it comes to our right to freedom of speech. Jason Moscovitz states: “Of all the attributes she brings to the high court, there is one that sticks out. Many legal experts say she does not consider the Charter of Rights to be necessarily sacred.” [Jason Moscovitz CBC Date: 991103 Time: 22:00:00 ET - 22:26:00 ET]

While still in her twenties SCC Abella was appointed a member of the Human Rights Commission of Ontario. Her husband, Irving Abella, is the J. Richard Shiff Professor of Canadian Jewish Studies at York University in Toronto and a past president of the Canadian Jewish Congress, one of the leading “hate speech law” lobby groups in Canada.

SCC Justice Abella is on the International Board of the Hebrew University, a member of the United States Holocaust Museum’s Committee on Conscience (again, pushing the 6 million lies of the Zionists that have become since WWII one of the principal pillars supporting all of their criminal actions since that time).

The president (Canadian Section) of the International Commission of Jurists, cited her as one whose “entire life has revolved around the cause of human rights… She has shaped Canadian policy in equality rights, and…has also had a profound impact on human rights law and policy outside Canada.” The precise manner in HOW SCC has “shaped Canadian policy in equality rights” is now fairly apparent given her complicity in this recent and deplorable attack upon Canada’s unquestionable right to freedom of speech.

SCC Justice Abella also served as a commissioner on the Ontario Human Rights Commission. Again, those who have been complicit in the actions of the human “rights” commissions here in Canada have revealed their motives clearly enough over the past decade and longer and have lost credibility in the eyes of the rest of the 98% of Canada who do not want to have their rights tampered with to satisfy the spurious and fraudulent false front arguments of special minority groups.

True to his name there’s definitely something “fishy” about this lastest SCC decision.

SCC Justice Rothstein has served as an adjudicator under the Manitoba Human Rights Act from 1978 to 1983 and as a member of the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal from 1986 to 1992. He has also held many other offices or appointments connected to the Manitoba Human Rights Act and the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal.

So what have people like Marshall Rothstein learned from all of their involvement in harassing and vilifying and criminalizing Canadians for having exercised their God-given right to freedom of expression and speech? By all appearances he’s learned that the manipulation of the law,when it is being supported by a Fifth Column media and a host of complicit, compromised politicians under the sway of the Zionist lobby, is relatively easy to accomplish and virtually a fait accompli.

———

Filed Under: Abrams/BBC v. Arthur Topham & RadicalPress.com, B'nai Brith, B'nai Brith Canada, B'nai Brith International, Canada's Queer Community, Canadian "Just-Us" System, Canadian Association for Free Expression (CAFE), Canadian Catholic News, Canadian Charter of Rights & Freedoms, Canadian Constitution Foundation (CCF), Canadian Council for Israel and Jewish Advocacy, Canadian Council for Israel and Jewish Advocacy (CIJA), Canadian Federation of Chabad Lubavitch, Canadian Free Speech League, Canadian Human Rights Act, Canadian Human Rights Commission, Canadian Human Rights Tribunal, Canadian Identity/Sovereignty, Canadian Jewish Congress, Canadian Jewish Defense League, Canadian Jewish Lobby, Canadian Judicial System, Canadian Rights and Freedom Bulletin, Christianity, Christians, Editor's Zone, Freedom of Expression, Freedom of Speech, Freedom of Thought, Homosexuals, Political Zionism, Supreme Court of Canada, The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, The Radical Press

Radical Press Interview with Mark Glenn on The Ugly Truth BlogRadio Show

February 22, 2013 by admin Leave a Comment

Here is the Url to the show: http://blogtalk.vo.llnwd.net/o23/show/4/445/show_4445021.mp3

Dear Supporters of Freedom of Speech everywhere,

On Thursday, February 21st, 2012 I was privileged to be able to go on Mark Glenn’s BlogRadio show hosted by his site The Ugly Truth.

Mark is an excellent host and speaker and is extremely well versed in the Zionist issues of today and yesterday. As such his preliminary commentary on a number of issues that precedes my actual interview is well worth listening to.

The show lasted for an hour and forty-eight minutes so it will take some time to listen to but I highly recommend that you do.

The one thing that struck me most deeply as I listened to Mark speaking was the fact that in the United States the founding fathers had the forethought to insure that the people of that nation would take their freedoms seriously and therefore guaranteed that the foremost freedom, that of freedom of speech, would be enshrined in their Constitution. Were it so in Canada.

Here we are facing the pernicious machinations of the foreign state of Israel and its B’nai Brith lobbyists, compounded by the fact that these same inimical enemies of freedom also control our country’s media and have gained an extremely critical foothold both within the office of the Prime Minster of Canada Mr. Stephen Harper and within our judiciary. Their dangerous influence upon our government and our democratic institutions, exemplified by the self-created “hate crime” laws which they surreptitiously slipped into our legal system over time, stands as the most clear example of seditious actions aimed at undermining and subverting our government.

Hiding behind their mask of “mainstream” media propaganda they are in full attack mode and out to repress and control Canadian’s right to free expression and freedom of speech on the internet. Without our ability to talk freely about Israel and its sayanim, Fifth column organizations like B’nai Brith and its ideology of Zionism and to offer our perspectives and our criticisms on this most dangerous and diabolic political device ever known to humankind we are severely handicapped in our efforts to educate people as to its true design and motives and thus initiate measures to protect our own Constitutional rights and freedoms.

Thus the need for further and greater education on these matters. Please take the time to listen to this broadcast and remember that feedback to me is always welcome and necessary. I can be reached at radical@radicalpress.com .

Here is the Url to the show: http://blogtalk.vo.llnwd.net/o23/show/4/445/show_4445021.mp3

Filed Under: "hate speech", Abrams/B'nai Brith Canada v. Arthur Topham and RadicalP, America, Anti-Defamation League (ADL), Anti-terrorism Act, Arthur Topham, B'nai Brith Canada, BC HATE CRIME TEAM, Canadian Charter of Rights & Freedoms, Canadian Human Rights Act, Canadian Human Rights Commission, Canadian Human Rights Tribunal, Canadian Identity/Sovereignty, Canadian Judicial System, Conservative Party of Canada, Cst Normandie Levas BC HATE CRIME TEAM, Det-Cst Terry Wilson BC HATE CRIME TEAM, Editor's Zone, Free Speech on the Internet, Freedom of Speech, Gaza, Germany Must Perish!, Harry Abrams, Hasbara, Hate Crime laws, Hate laws, Israeli Terrorism, Israeli War Crimes, Jewish Censorship, Jewish Hatred, Jewish Lobby, Jewish Media Monopoly, Jewish power, Jewish Racism, Jewish Supremacism, Jews, League for Human Rights of B'nai Brith Canada, Mainstream Mindcontrol Media (M3), Mainstream News Media (msm), Marc Lemire, Mark Glenn, National Zionist Jew Post, New World Order, Palestine, PM Stephen Harper, Political Zionism, RCMP Corruption, Richard Warman, Rothschild Zionist Criminal Cartel, Royal Canadian Mounted Police, sayanim, Sec. 13(1) CHRA, Sec. 319(2) CC "Willful Promotion of Hatred", The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, The Radical Press, World Zionist Organization

Jewry’s Plan For Universal Background Checks on U.S. Gun Owners by Brother Nathanael Kapner

January 23, 2013 by admin Leave a Comment

[EDITOR'S NOTE: Once again I wish to acknowledge the efforts of Brother Nathanael of Real Jew News to bring to the attention of people everywhere the dangerous and insidious actions of the Zionist Jews who are fully in control of the American government as well as all the mainstream media and are now attempting, as they did in Russia, after their Bolshevik Zionist coup in 1917, to disarm the people by destroying the 2nd Amendment to the US Constitution. In the case of the Soviet Marxist Bolshevik Jew-run regime, after they had gained absolute control there they proceeded to round up and murder close to 66 million Russian citizens.

Now they are planning to do the same thing in America. This may end up being their final fatal lunge at absolute control of the nation, one that hopefully will back fire and blow up in their greedy, power-hungry faces.]

——

Jewry’s Plan

For Universal Background Checks

By Brother Nathanael Kapner Copyright 2013
January 23, 2013

Send Your Contribution To:
The Brother Nathanael Foundation, PO Box 1242, Frisco CO 80443
E-mail: brothernathanaelfoundation@yahoo.com

UNIVERSAL BACKGROUND CHECKS for ALL firearms purchases—whether at gun shows and shops, between individuals and online—is Jewry’s latest plan to strip the Gentiles of their Second Amendment rights.

In other words, gun buyers will soon be peeing into cups all across America.

Launching Jewry’s totalitarian scheme is Jewish Senator Chuck Schumer who announced his Marxist scheme on Meet The Press this past Sunday.

Boasting of his authorship of universal background checks, Schumer predicted that in the “next week or two” lawmakers would show “broad support” for his legislation.

Teaming up with Schumer is yet another Jew who hates our freedoms, billionaire Michael Rubens Bloomberg, Mayor of NYC.

With Bloomberg at his side, Schumer announced that his new legislation, the Fix Gun Checks Act, would mandate that all those purchasing guns, including transactions through private sellers, would be subject to a background check, effectively closing the so-called gun show loophole.

Schumer’s Jewish-inspired legislation would also slap harsh penalties on States that fail to comply with his background check system: a 25% cut in Federal funds.

A COMMUNIST MANIFESTO, the Denying Firearms And Explosives Act, sponsored by a slew of Jews: Lautenberg, Feinstein, Levin, Schumer and Boxer, grants the Attorney General the authority to prohibit citizens from owning firearms by placing selected names on a “Watch List” with no explanation for the denial of their Second Amendment rights.

Yet another draconian law, (sponsored by the same Constitution-Hating Jews), the Gun Show Background Check Act, targets Gun Shows and its attendees.

This piece of Jewish legislation provides regulation and inspection of Gun Shows by Federal agents and a two-year prison sentence for any Gun Show sponsor who fails to notify EVERY attendee of his ‘responsibilities’ under the Brady Law that criminalizes unlicensed gun buyers.

Not to be outdone by his synagogue buddies, Jewish Senator Frank Lautenberg on his first day back on Capitol Hill 2013 introduced his High-Capacity Magazine Ban that would ban ALL ammunition magazines holding more than 10 rounds.

Teaming up with (yes, ALL Jews) Feinstein, Blumenthal, Levin, ‘Chuckie’ Schumer and Boxer, Lautenberg resubmitted his Background Checks Act that requires background checks to be conducted on all purchases at Gun Shows, even sales by private parties.

Finally, Barbara Levy Boxer, (of course, a Jew), is after your hand guns with her sponsorship of the Concealed Firearms Permit Act.

Boxer’s Marxist Bill would require every State issuing a Concealed Carry Permit to “demonstrate good cause” for requesting a Concealed Firearm Permit and to “prove” that the applicant is “worthy of the public trust.”

WHAT BOXER AND THE JEWS really mean is that THEY will decide who can buy a gun and who cannot.

And once dossiers on millions of gun owners are fully entered into a Federal Data Bank, the question is what will Jewry demand background checks for next?

Membership in the NRA? Joining a Gun Club? Using a Shooting Range? Participating in a Protest March? Joining a Demonstration against our Jew-ridden government?

Methinks it’s time to buy defensive weapons NOW and prepare for their effective use.

——-

Filed Under: Brother Nathanael Kapner, Communist Manifesto, Editor's Zone, Gun Control, Jewish Lobby Groups, Jewish Media Monopoly, Jewish power, Jewish Racism, Jewish Senator Chuck Schumer, Jewish Supremacism, Jewish Terrorists, Jews Behind Bolshevik Revolution, Mayor of NYC, Political Zionism, Real Jew News, The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, US Constitution Second Amendment

Simon Wiesenthal Center’s 2012 Top Ten Anti-Semitic/Anti-Israel Slurs by Simon Says….

January 7, 2013 by admin Leave a Comment

Editor’s Note:

An associate of mine sent me the following email admonishing me for having missed the Top 10 Anti-Semites of the year! What could I say but hey, I guess I’ll have to try harder in 2013!

It is quite an array of people who have had the courage to stand up and speak out about a problem that has plagued the planet for a good century or longer on a massive scale. My best regards go out to all of them and the thousands upon thousands more like myself who also are doing our utmost to expose the lies and deception of the Zionist juggernaut.

Power to the Truth and Courage to the Truth seekers!

Arthur Topham

___________

MG writes:

Arthur, you didnt make the list….
All I can say is…
You`re not trying hard enough LOL!!!

http://www.wiesenthal.com/atf/cf/%7B54d385e6-f1b9-4e9f-8e94-890c3e6dd277%7D/TT_2012_3.PDF

http:///s88.photobucket.com/albums/k188/ArthurTopham/?action=view&current=ScreenShot2013-01-07at61342PM.png” target=”_blank”> "SWC7</a

Filed Under: "hate speech", "Jewish" holocaust, Abe Foxman, Abrams/BBC v. Arthur Topham & RadicalPress.com, ADL, Ahmadinejad, American Jewish Committee, Anti-Defamation League (ADL), Anti-ZionistCanada Yahoo Group, B'nai Brith Canada, B'nai Brith International, BC HATE CRIME TEAM, Carlos Latuff Cartoonist, Charter of Rights & Freedoms, Cst Normandie Levas BC HATE CRIME TEAM, Deir Yassin massacre, Det-Cst Terry Wilson BC HATE CRIME TEAM, Dresden Holocaust, Editor's Zone, Free Speech on the Internet, Greece's Golden Dawn Party, Hungarian Jobbik Party, Ilias Kasidiaris - Golden Dawn, Israeli Terrorism, Israeli War Crimes, Jakob Augstein - Der Freitag Weekly, Jewish Holocaust Industry, Jewish Holocaust Lie, Jewish Lobby Groups, Jewish Media Monopoly, Jewish power, Jewish Racism, Jewish Supremacism, Jewish Terrorists, Louis Farrakhan, Mohammed Badie, Muslim Brotherhood, Nikolaos Michaloliakos - Golden Dawn founder, Oleg Tyagnibok - Svoboda Party of the Ukraine, Palestine, Political Zionism, RCMP Corruption, Simon Weisenthal Center, The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, Trond Ali Linstad - Norway, World Zionist Organization

Richard Warman’s ‘Maximum Disruption’ Attacks upon Freedom of Speech in Canada from Marc Lemire at freedomsite.org

January 1, 2013 by admin Leave a Comment

Dear Free Speech supporters,

First I wish to thank Marc Lemire for sending along the information contained below. His valiant and courageous efforts over many years are worthy of our deepest appreciation.

The actions of the entity known as Richard Warman are definitely ones that Canadians should be more aware of. Given his propensity for decades of ongoing attacks against freedom of expression here in Canada I feel it behooves all Canadians to take a closer look at his conduct. In doing so people ought to ask themselves how in God’s name our legal system could permit someone like this to go on year after year running amok and getting away with his endless attempts at exploiting Canadian laws for the benefit of his own selfish gain, not to mention the tacit support given to those foreign Jewish lobby groups such as B’nai Brith Canada and the Canadian Jewish Congress; Zionist organizations hell-bent on silencing any and all legitimate criticism of their and Israel’s historic wrongs against humanity.

Warman of course is one of the two B’nai Brith Canada operatives who has been on my ass since 2007, doing his damnedest to shut down www.radicalpress.com and drive me into the hole financially. He’s not alone though for no man is an island unto himself when it comes to the “Jewish hate speech” racket that the Zionist and their lobbyist organizations have created and exploited throughout all the nations of the West since WWII in their ongoing efforts to cover up Zion’s endless crimes.

Back in 2007 when I was first charged with a sec. 13(1) “hate crime” complaint by Harry Abrams and the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada Warman wasn’t named on any of the documents. Had it not been for the fact that I was able to obtain a leaked email I would not have been aware of his surreptitious involvement in my case.

When word got out that I had received this Bolshevik/Zionist “show trial” accusative “complaint” document in my mailbox on November 20, 2007 my local newspaper, the Quesnel Cariboo Observer was interested in doing an interview with me on the subject. Having been a regular contributor to its Letters to the Editor section in the local community paper for over 35 years, plus a bi-weekly columnist, the locals in the community were obviously curious about this sudden complaint from the world’s largest Jewish lobby group.

On January 13, 2008 the Observer ran an article entitled, “TOPHAM VIEWS UNDER ATTACK: B’nai Brith claims anti-Jewish writings“. In the article was expressed my viewpoint and why I felt that B’nai Brith Canada was acting the way it was.

As soon as that story hit the streets Harry Abrams of the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada was on the telephone from Victoria, B.C. doing his utmost to browbeat and intimidate the journalist who had interviewed me for the article. It’s not the first time that ol’ Harry was found to be extremely abusive when dealing with those who he felt were not behaving as good goyim ought to behave when it comes to the questionable machinations of the Jewish state of Israel. Of course the journalist was not impressed one iota with Abrams’ manner of communication.

Soon afterwards Abrams wrote a response to the Letters section of the Observer wherein he did his best to bring up the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion and use that document as some sort of proof that I was posting hate literature against those of the Jewish faith. At the same time he basically demanded that I should remove all posts that he felt were unacceptable and if I did so then that would be the end of the matter. Of course his wishes never came true and beside, given the way that his co-conspirator Richard Warman operates, it’s highly doubtful that had I kowtowed to Abrams’ request that the matter would have ended. As we know from Warman’s relentless attacks upon Marc Lemire, AFTER MARC WILLINGLY REMOVED WHATEVER OFFENDING POSTS WERE ON A WEBSITE RAN BY HIM, complying with their Orwellian demands only makes these censorship control freaks that much more inclined to sink their fangs deeper into their perceived victims.

Following Abrams’ letter to the Editor which was published on January 27, 2008 the newspaper was flooded with letters of support for me that came from around the world. This was just too much for the cheeky Cheka twins, Abrams & Warman, and soon thereafter the owner and publisher of the Quesnel Cariboo Observer, David Black of Black Press (not associated with Conrad Black) received a letter from these two Zionist agents threatening his company with a law suit should it continue to publish any more articles related to the sec. 13 complaint that Abrams had laid against me via the Canadian Human Rights Commission (CHRC). Warman’s and Abrams’ argument was that the sec. 13(1) complaint was before the CHRC and no decision had yet been made so it was illegal for the Quesnel Cariboo Observer to be publishing anything pertaining to the matter. Of course, like all things that the Zionists say and do, it was pure bullshit.

There are NO legal restrictions in reporting on matters related to the machinations of the Zionist-controlled Canadian Human Rights Commission nor its accessory in crime, the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal. Both these Zionist infested orgs are considered to be quasi-judicial in nature and not subject to the same restrictions as the official Canadian Judicial System (even though it too is just as infested as the others with pro-Zionist sycophants).

And so the upshot of all of this was that Black Press decided it wouldn’t stand up for freedom of speech or to the Jewish lobby and ended up bending to the pressure of these two snivelling censorship snakes and from then on until June of this year a veil of silence hung over my six year long battle with these haters of free expression. That is why you will not be able to find the articles noted above except on my website where I was able to post them prior to their censorship by Black Press.

I’m writing this background information as an aid in understanding just how insane the court system has become since it’s been co-oped by the Jewish lobbyists and their pro-Zionist lawyers and judges who inevitably put the desires of Israel and the racist ideology of Zionism first and foremost when it comes to upholding the supposed rights and freedoms of all Canadians to expressing their views on the Internet.

When I was arrested back in May of 2012 Det-Cst Terry Wilson of the BC HATE CRIME TEAM made a big deal out of trying to convince me that their unit was going to be investigating these charges in a wholly new and unbiased manner and were not planning on bringing into the equation all of the past dealings that I had with these two bozos who had just laid the second sec. 319(2) charge against me; one that resulted in being jailed, losing my firearms and my computers and all of my electronic files and email going back many years.

But of course this was just another stinking pile of crap from another pro-Zionist special agent working for B’nai Brith along with Abrams and Warman. As it turned out later on I found that Det – Cst Wilson had been working with these zio-rats for many years before and all of this sudden new charge and arrest, etc. was nothing less than a further extension of their earlier attempts to shut me down and put me in jail in order to keep the truth about the Zionists hidden from the general public.

So please bear this in mind as you read through the list of vicious attacks perpetrated upon innocent people who have had their rights and freedoms suppressed, spent time in jail, and had their computers and files and firearms seized and their bank accounts drained all because of this one entity who should have been disbarred years ago and prevented from engaging in any legal activities.

Richard Warman is the epitome of all that is wrong with our Canadian legal system and anyone who has ever been harassed, threatened or victimized by this serial psychopathic complainer should be absolved of all accusations and convictions, their names cleared by the federal court and financially compensated for any and all legal costs incurred during their lengthy battles to retain their fundamental rights as given by Canada’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms. As an associate suggested after reading my initial comments here, “An application should be made, if it has not been done already, to have Warman declared a ‘Vexatious Litigant’ – there is ample precedent I think for this where an individual has persistently abused the system, an offence of which Warman is guilty, in spades! The fact that he has been clearly motivated by malice and personal financial gain and assists a subversive political lobby, would reinforce the application.”

Nothing less in terms of redress ought to be considered when it comes to Richard Warman. Apart from disbarment, a healthy jail sentence of say five years ought to give this traitorous Zionist lackey enough time to reflect on his actions and prepare for a new career upon his release.

With the end of 2012 only hours away I’d like to take one final parting shot at this whole sordid affair known as Zionism. After years and years of researching its fundamentals and observing its ideology in action I’ve come to the only conclusion that I feel any honest, decent human being could be expected to reach. Zionism is, in truth, a mental disease. It’s a psychotic, delusional state of mind wherein adherents to its core cognitive structure and values – all contingent upon a mental belief that one small segment of the human family or species is somehow above and separate from all the rest of humanity – tend to behave in a cult-like fashion in order to outwardly express this political (psycho-mental philosophy) doctrine; one that sees no wrong in the destruction and murder and terrorization of any and all other human beings who stand in the way of its ultimate fulfillment. I can also state with added assurance that the new year will see more and more reasonable, intelligent and caring, loving individuals come to a similar conclusion as the weight of evidence backing such a contention grows heavier and heavier and the Zionist Beast grows more and more desperate and deranged in its behaviour.

God grant that we will stop it before the destruction gets beyond our control.

The best to all of you in 2013!

Love & Peace & Justice for All,

Arthur Topham
Publisher & Editor
The Radical Press
“Digging to the root of the issues since 1998″

________________________________

From: Marc Lemire <marc@lemire.com>

Subject: Richard Warman’s ‘Maximum Disruption’ Approach: Defamation Suits, Criminal Complaints, Section 13 cases and even Copyright Act lawsuits

Date: 31 December, 2012 1:01:18 AM PST

Richard Warman’s ‘Maximum Disruption’ Approach:

Defamation Suits, Criminal Complaints, Section 13 cases and even Copyright Act lawsuits

http://blog.freedomsite.org/2012/12/richard-warmans-maximum-disruption.html

http://canadianhumanrightscommission.blogspot.ca/2012/12/richard-warmans-maximum-disruption.html

Richard Warman is one of Canada’s leading serial complainants. Richard Warman described his tactic of filing complaints as “Maximum Disruption” in a speech he gave to a group called Anti-Racist Action. According to Mr. Warman; “This approach involved working with the police, the Canadian Human Rights Commission and other organizations to create “maximum disruption” within what he perceives to be the Neo-Nazi movement in Canada.”

Here is a list of some of the lawsuits and other complaints he has filed:

—————————————————–

People Richard Warman has sued or threatened to sue

Alphabetically sorted

	Person	Court file # or Source
1)	3535991 Canada Inc.	Ontario Court File No. 12-55389
2)	Andrea Rondeau	Ontario Court File No. 10-47357
3)	Andrew Spencer (Droid1963)	Ontario Court File No. 07-CV-039927SR
4)	Arnie Lemaire	Ontario Court File No. 09-46638
5)	Banyen Books	Ontario Court File No. 02-CV-237691SR
6)	BC Libraries Association	Macleans Magazine: April 21, 2008
7)	Biosfaire	Ontario Court File No. 02-CV-237691SR
8)	Black Press Group Ltd.	http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=684
9)	Boule De Neige	Ontario Court File No. 02-CV-237691SR
10)	Bridge of LovePublications	Ontario Ontario Court File No. 02-CV-237691SR
11)	Byron Tau	http://btau.blogspot.com/2008/04/my-own-tiny-role-in-canadas-biggest.html
12)	Canadian Association for Free Expression	Ontario Court File No: 04-CV-26550SR
13)	Canoe Inc.	Ontario Court File No. 12-53851
14)	Canwest Digital Media	Ontario Court File No. 10-47357
15)	Canwest Global Communications Corp	Ontario Court File No. 10-47357
16)	Canwest Interactive	Ontario Court File No. 10-47357
17)	Canwest Limited Partnership	Ontario Court File No. 10-47357
18)	Canwest Mediaworks Inc.	Ontario Court File No. 10-47357
19)	Canwest Mediaworks Publications Inc.	Ontario Court File No. 10-47357
20)	Canwest Publishing Inc.	Ontario Court File No. 10-47357
21)	Catherine McMillan	Ontario Court File No: 08-CV-352197SR
22)	Constance Fournier	Ontario Court File No. 07-CV-039927SR
23)	Constance Fournier	Ontario Court File No: 08-CV-352197SR
24)	Constance Fournier	Ontario Court File No. 08-CV-352212SR
25)	Cowichan Valley Citizen	Ontario Court File No. 10-47357
26)	Crossroads Television System Inc.	Ontario Court File No. 10-49969
27)	Dan Lepage (SaskBigPicture)	Ontario Court File No. 07-CV-039927SR
28)	Eternal Moment Bookstore	Ontario Court File No. 02-CV-237691SR
29)	Ezra Levant	Ontario Court File No: 08-CV-352197SR
30)	Ezra Levant	Ontario Court File No. CV-09-00370919
31)	Ezra Levant	Ontario Court File No. 12-53851
32)	Ezra Levant	Ontario Court File No. 12-55389
33)	Fivefeetoffury.com	Ontario Court File No: 08-CV-352197SR
34)	Freedominion.ca	Ontario Court File No: 08-CV-352197SR
35)	Freedominion.ca	Ontario Court File No. 08-CV-352212SR
36)	Global TV Calgary	Ontario Court File No. 10-47357
37)	Global TV Lethbridge	Ontario Court File No. 10-47357
38)	Jason Bertucci (Faramir)	Ontario Court File No. 07-CV-039927SR
39)	Jason Ouwendyk	Ontario Small Claims Court File No. 03-SC-081720
40)	John Doe (conscience)	Ontario Court File No. 07-CV-039927SR
41)	John Doe (HR-101)	Ontario Court File No. 07-CV-039927SR
42)	John Doe (Klinxx)	Ontario Court File No. 07-CV-039927SR
43)	John Doe (Padraigh)	Ontario Court File No. 07-CV-039927SR
44)	Jonathan Kay	Ontario Court File No: 08-CV-352197SR
45)	Kamloops Public Library	BC Civil Liberties Press Release:http://www.bccla.org/pressreleases/04libelandslander.htm
46)	Kathy Shaidle	Ontario Court File No: 08-CV-352197SR
47)	Kathy Shaidle	Ontario Court File No. 12-53851
48)	Kelly McParland	Ontario Court File No. CV-09-00370919
49)	Knowledge Bookstore	Ontario Court File No. 02-CV-237691SR
50)	Mark Fournier	Ontario Court File No: 08-CV-352197SR
51)	Mark Fournier	Ontario Court File No. 07-CV-039927SR
52)	Mark Fournier	Ontario Court File No. 08-CV-352212SR
53)	Michael Coren	Ontario Court File No. 10-49969
54)	Michael Coren	Ontario Court File No. 12-53851
55)	Michael Veck	Ontario Court File No. CV-10-410527
56)	National Post Company	Ontario Court File No: 08-CV-352197SR
57)	National Post Company	Ontario Court File No. CV-09-00370919
58)	Northern Alliance	Ontario Small Claims Court File No. 03-SC-081720
59)	Paul Fromm	Ontario Court File No: 04-CV-26550SR
60)	Preferred Network	Ontario Court File No. 02-CV-237691SR
61)	Quebecor Media Inc.	Ontario Court File No. 12-53851
62)	Quebecor Media Inc.	Ontario Court File No. 12-55389
63)	Quesnel Cariboo Observer (Newspaper)	http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=684
64)	Roger Smith (Peter O’ Donnell)	Ontario Court File No. 07-CV-039927SR
65)	Russell McOrmond	http://www.digital-copyright.ca/node/2603
66)	Seekers Books	Ontario Court File No. 02-CV-237691SR
67)	Shirley Skolos	Ontario Court File No. 10-47357
68)	Smalldeadanimals.com	Ontario Court File No: 08-CV-352197SR
69)	Sun Media Corporation	Ontario Court File No. 12-53851
70)	Sun Media Corporation	Ontario Court File No. 12-55389
71)	Sun TV News General Partnership	Ontario Court File No. 12-55389
72)	The McGill Tribune	http://btau.blogspot.com/2008/04/my-own-tiny-role-in-canadas-biggest.html
73)	Thompson Nicola Regional Public Libraries	Macleans Magazine: April 21, 2008
74)	Tom Kennedy	Ontario Court File No. 02-CV-237691SR
75)	Toronto Public Library	Toronto Public Library: MATERIALS REVIEW COMMITTEE RECONSIDERATION OF MATERIALS SUMMARY – 2002
76)	TVA Group Inc.	Ontario Court File No. 12-55389
77)	Vancouver Public Library	BC Civil Liberties Press Release:http://www.bccla.org/pressreleases/04libelandslander.htm
78)	Victoria Indymedia	http://www.digital-copyright.ca/node/3102
79)	Victoria Public Library	BC Civil Liberties Press Release:http://www.bccla.org/pressreleases/04libelandslander.htm
80)	Walker Morrow	Ontario Court File No. 10-47357
81)	William Grosvenor	Ontario Court File No. 08-CV-40460SR

Lawsuits filed under Canada’s Copyright Act

1)	Richard Warman and National Post v Mark and Constance Fournier	Federal Court of Canada: T-784-11
2)	Richard Warman and National Post v Mark and Constance Fournier	Federal Court of Appeal: A-395-12

Section 13 Complaints by Richard Warman

Cases before the CHRC and/or Canadian Human Rights Tribunal

1	T726_3102	FRED KYBURZ
2	T998/11804	Eldon Warman
3	T869/11903	Alexan Kulbashian,
4	T869/11903	James Scott Richardson,
5	T869/11903	Tri-city Skins.com,
6	T869/11903	Canadian Ethnic Cleansing Team,
7	T869/11903	Affordable Space.com
8	T1021/0205	Tomasz Winnicki
9	T1072/5305	Craig Harrison
10	T1071/5205	Peter Kouba
11	T1088/6905	Glenn Bahr
12	T1087/6805	Western Canada for Us
13	T1104/8505	Terry Tremaine
14	20031846	Alex Di Civita
15	20031844	Liz Lampman
16	T1095/7605	Bobby Wilkinson
17	T1095/7605	“Canadian Nazi Party”
18	T1106/8705	Jessica Beaumont
19	T1073/5405	Marc Lemire
20	20031956	Freedomsite .org
21	T1090/7105	Melissa Guille
22	T1090/7105	Canadian Heritage Alliance
23		Ciaran Paul Donnelly
24	20030360	WCOTC (World Church of the Creator)
25	T1217/2907	Jason Ouwendyk
26	T1216/2807	Northern Alliance

Criminal Complaints by Richard Warman

1	Alexan Kulbashian	Warman’s Testimony in Lemire Case
2	Arthur Topham	http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=1405
3	Bill White	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Warman
4	Ciarian Donnelly	Warman’s Testimony in Lemire Case
5	Craig Harrison	Warman’s Testimony in Lemire Case
6	Freedomsite	Warman’s Testimony in Lemire Case
7	Glenn Bahr	Warman’s Testimony in Lemire Case
8	James Richardson	Warman’s Testimony in Lemire Case
9	Jessica Beaumont	Warman’s Testimony in Lemire Case
10	Marc Lemire	Warman’s Testimony in Lemire Case
11	Peter Kouba	Warman’s Testimony in Lemire Case
12	Terry Tremaine	www.freedominion.ca/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?f=70&t=159251
13	William Grosvenor	Warman Speech – University of Moncton – March 16, 2010

Please note, for all cases; please refer to the original source material. In the case of the Libel suits, where the source is indicated as a court file, that is an actual lawsuit Warman has filed. Where the source is something other, like a URL, please refer to the originating material. This may or may not be a lawsuit or threatened lawsuit by Warman. The truths of the statements are via the websites.
Please refer to the original source material. This document consists of an overview of cases which (it appears that) Warman has filed or threatened. This is not a complete list. There may be many other cases in all categories, including criminal complaints, libel complaints, Section 13 cases, etc.
If any mistakes are made of this page, please send an email to; marc@lemire.com for correction.

Richard Warman’s ‘Maximum Disruption’ Approach:

Defamation Suits, Criminal Complaints, Section 13 cases and even Copyright Act lawsuits

http://blog.freedomsite.org/2012/12/richard-warmans-maximum-disruption.html

http://canadianhumanrightscommission.blogspot.ca/2012/12/richard-warmans-maximum-disruption.html

_______________________________

NOTE: My apologies for having to include the following appeal but out of necessity, I am forced to ask for financial assistance in this ongoing battle with the foreign interest censors who are determined to stop all freedom of expression in Canada. Due to the fact that the Crown is refusing to give the required disclosure to my lawyer I am not able to apply for legal aid. This leaves me in the unenviable position of having to rely solely upon donations to pay for my legal expenses.

The day after my lawyer’s appearance in Quesnel on the 19th of December I received an invoice showing a balance of $5,222.79 still owing on Mr. Christie’s account. Given my minimal monthly pension of approximately $1400.00 out of which I must pay my mortgage and utilities and insurance on home and vehicles (this doesn’t cover additional costs for fuel and food) which come to approximately $1200.00 one can see that it’s virtually impossible for me to cover these expenses without further assistance from supporters.

As such I would once again implore readers to give serious consideration to helping me out by either sending a donation via PayPal using either a PayPal account or a credit card or else sending a cheque or Money Order or cash to me via snail mail at the following postal address. Cash of course also works. Please don’t make the cheque out to “RadicalPress” as that account is no longer available to me.

Arthur Topham

4633 Barkerville Highway

Quesnel, B.C.

Canada

V2J 6T8

To access my PayPal button please go to either the Home Page at http://www.radicalpress.com or my blog http://www.quesnelcariboosentinel.com The PayPal button is up on the right hand corner of the Home Page on either site. Feel free to click on it.

Sincerely,

Arthur Topham

Pub/Ed

The Radical Press

Filed Under: "hate speech", Abrams/B'nai Brith Canada v. Arthur Topham and RadicalP, Alternative Media, Anti-Defamation League (ADL), anti-Semitism, Anti-terrorism Act, Arthur Topham - Editor & Publisher, B'nai Brith, B'nai Brith Canada, B'nai Brith International, BC HATE CRIME TEAM, Bolsheviks, Canadian Human Rights Act, Canadian Human Rights Commission, Canadian Human Rights Tribunal, Canadian Jewish Congress, Canadian Judicial System, Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Cst Normandie Levas BC HATE CRIME TEAM, Det-Cst Terry Wilson BC HATE CRIME TEAM, Douglas H. Christie, Editor's Zone, Free Speech on the Internet, Freedom of Expression, Freedom of Speech, George Orwell, Harry Abrams, Hate Crime laws, Internet Freedom, Israeli Terrorism, Jewish Banking Cartel, Jewish Defense League (JDL), Jewish Lobby Groups, Jewish Media Monopoly, Jewish Racism, Jewish Supremacism, Jewish Talmudists, Jewish Terrorists, League for Human Rights of B'nai Brith Canada, Radical Press, RadicalPress.com, RCMP Corruption, Richard Warman, Rothschild Zionist Criminal Cartel, Royal Canadian Mounted Police, Sec. 319(2) CC "Willful Promotion of Hatred", Section 13 of CHRA, Section 13(1), The Controversy of Zion, The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, Ukrainian Holocaust, World Zionist Organization

The Men Who Taste Jews in Their Sandwiches by Jim Goad

December 29, 2012 by admin 1 Comment

[EDITOR'S NOTE: Currently there's some serious cyber fistacuffin' going on in the alternative media ring between proponents who, as this poignant piece below points out, see everything as being a direct result of Jewish malfeasance and every "Jew" equally culpable when it comes to the multi-faceted query known historically as "The Jewish Question" and those who tend to discriminate (oi!) and assign guilt or responsibility only to the ones (and their sycophants) directly responsible for the woes that befall the self-chosen.

The article below is one of the best interpretations of this problem that I've come across. Please take the time to read and share it with others.

Oh yes, and lest I forget... This particular post is also for Det-Cst Terry Wilson of the BC HATE CRIME TEAM who arrested me, traumatized my dear wife, put me in jail and then illegally entered my home and stole all of my computers and firearms back on May 16, 2012. Ever since his shameful, ignoble performance he faithfully reads all of the posts on www.radicalpress.com each day (when he's not reading all of my thousands of personal emails that were on my computers) in order to scrape together "evidence" that he then sends along like a good little school boy tattle tale to Crown council Jennifer Johnston in Quesnel, B.C. who further flaps pages of all of my posts before the eyes of the Judges so as to reinforce the Queen of England's (Regina) false sec. 319(2) CC charge of willfully promoting hatred against "people of the Jewish religion or ethnic group."

On occasion I like to reinforce this person's traitorous behaviour with a graphic showing the evidence covering his face. I know how important it is for Terry to have his mugshot in the media as it helps him and his accomplices to justify in their own petty little minds not only their existence but also that fat pay cheque they get for acting as Orwellian thought police for the foreign lobbyists who currently control Canada's Prime Minister and all of the opposition parties. I am, of course, referring to B'nai Brith 'Canada' the Israeli lobby 5th Column Mossad agency that is responsible for attacking me in the courts for the past six years.

Anyhow, do enjoy this well-written piece by someone I had not heard of until today.]

—————–

http://takimag.com/article/the_men_who_taste_jews_in_their_sandwiches_jim_goad#axzz2GSd5taZI

Notes From the Edge

The Men Who Taste Jews in Their Sandwiches

by Jim Goad

November 19, 2012

I woke up this morning with a bit of a chest cold and decided not to blame the Jews for it. Some mystical yearning deep inside my heart—I believe it’s called “common sense”—led me to surmise that I am probably not afflicted with the Jew Flu.

It’s not that I hold Jews blameless, because they are human beings, too, Shylock, and are therefore not to be trusted. I hold other groups—blacks, feminists, and homosexual sausage-gobbling rump-wranglers—to the same standard. Merely because they find it fashionable to hide behind a shield of historic persecution to further their group interests and seemingly insatiable hunger for power doesn’t mean they are presumed innocent in all situations. I see Jews as human and therefore likely to be up to no good at any given moment.

Then again, neither do I blame the Jews for everything. But there is a tiny, bitter, and relentless subset of individuals who tend to do this reflexively. I call them “The Men Who Taste Jews in Their Sandwiches.” They also taste Jews in the soup they slurp and in the apple pie they eat for dessert.

Merely by stating this, I’m certain I’ll be accused of being afraid to admit that Jews control the sandwich industry.

These types inevitably turn any conversation toward Jews, no matter how little the topic at hand has to do with Jews. If Godwin’s Law predicts that every Internet discussion will inevitably lead to Nazi and Hitler comparisons, these creeps who eagerly leap across the line from logical to pathological are apparently bound by the inexorable forces of Goldman’s Law…or Goldstein’s Law…or Goldberg’s Law. In their diseased brains, all neurons lead to Jews. Perhaps one day this psychological disorder will be diagnosed and a book written about it called The Man Who Mistook His Hat for a Jew.

What’s ironic is the fact that although I don’t personally taste Jews in my sandwiches unless I’m eating a Reuben with kosher pickles, I likely ask some of the same questions as do the schmucks who even taste Jews in a slice of Wonder Bread with mayonnaise. I’m drawn to the Jewish Question merely because it’s such an untouchable topic. I realize that the mere act of questioning Jewish power and influence is a career-killer in much of the West, and that in certain countries asking certain questions about the Holocaust is enough to get you jailed. It’s one topic about which most “irreverent” and “non-PC” people are extremely reverent and effusively PC. I’ve also noticed that it’s a topic that many people are eager to talk about off the record but terrified to mention in public.

So here’s where I stand on Jews…OK, wait, roll back the tape…I don’t literally stand on Jews, because that would clearly be anti-Semitic. Here are some ancillary questions I have concerning the Jewish Question, and if it makes me anti-Semitic merely to ask them, I suppose I won’t be invited to your son’s Bar Mitzvah. If you want to crucify me merely for asking questions, well, I guess you’re one of The Men Who Tastes Nazis in Your Sandwiches.

The Jewish Question always seemed to lead to more questions than answers, so here goes:

• Are Jews members of an ethnic tribe or members of a religion? If the latter, how do you explain Jewish atheists? What exactly is a “Semite,” and why does the term “anti-Semitism” seem to embrace people who appear to be of Eastern European derivation while it tends to exclude Arabs and other indigenous Middle Easterners?

• If you’re so secure that the evidence surrounding the Holocaust is irrefutable, then why jail people who question the evidence? Why does the Western media feel compelled to mention the Holocaust almost daily while it routinely ignores the 30-50 million non-Jewish civilians—not soldiers, but civilians—who were killed in World War II? Were their lives not nearly as important?

• Why are certain “right-wing” writers brave enough to criticize communism, open immigration, the liberal media, and political correctness while they’re mortified to even consider that Jews were often the primary architects behind such movements—or at least disproportionately represented?

• Isn’t the idea of “God’s Chosen People” cosmically racist and supremacist? Is the Talmud not hostile to goyim? Haven’t the Jews historically been racially separatist, all while accusing other groups of “racism”?

• Is it even remotely possible that Jewish behavior, rather than a murkily mystical and ultimately unprovable notion such as “anti-Semitism,” sometimes led to negative perceptions about Jews? Even once throughout history?

• In a European Union document calling for “equal treatment between persons irrespective of racial or ethnic origin,” why does it urge that we should focus “in particular” on “anti-Semitism” if everyone is to be treated equally?

• Why does our current cultural climate allow one to decry “white privilege” but never “Jewish privilege,” especially since Jews are undeniably overrepresented statistically when it comes to wealth and power?

• At the moment, Israel and some of its enemies are lobbing missiles at one another. Why should I care about Israel? Why should I deem this dubiously founded and eternally disruptive nation so important that it’s worth starting World War III, shoveling out tax dollars, and enduring much of the world’s wrath to protect it? What do I get out of the deal?

So those are my questions. I won’t hold my goyishe breath waiting for you to answer them. But dismissing them outright as “paranoid” or “anti-Semitic” is either dishonest or naïve.

My questions are honest and sincere rather than “hateful,” and calling me all the nasty names in the Torah won’t budge my feelings or cause me to relent. And I believe that a huge quotient of the population has similar questions but have been terrorized into silence at the mere thought of asking them. As a truth-seeker rather than a team-joiner, I find this troublesome. So sue me!

And this is the main reason why The Men Who Taste Jews in Their Sandwiches are such a pain in my tuchis. They live up to the crude stereotype of rabid, delusional anti-Semites, and by so doing, they tend to allow all criticism of Jews to be painted with the same broad Jew Brush. They’re the ones who tend to give so-called “anti-Semites” a bad name. It almost makes me suspect that some of them may be Mossad agents.

Making EVERYTHING about Jews gives Jews far too much credit. So ease up, fellas. There are no Jews in your sandwiches. There are no Jews in your soup. If you have a chest cold, you likely didn’t get it from shaking hands with a Jew…or maybe you did, but that’s what you get for being friendly to Jews.

——–

Please share this article by using the link below. When you cut and paste an article, Taki’s Magazine misses out on traffic, and our writers don’t get paid for their work. Email editors@takimag.com to buy additional rights. http://takimag.com/article/the_men_who_taste_jews_in_their_sandwiches_jim_goad/print#ixzz2GSfhBxgg

Filed Under: "Canadian Parliamentary Coalition to Combat Anti-Semiti, "hate speech", "Jewish" holocaust, 'state' of Israel, Abrams/BBC v. Arthur Topham & RadicalPress.com, AIPAC, Alternative Media, Anti-Defamation League (ADL), anti-Semitism, Anti-ZionistCanada Yahoo Group, Ashkenazi Jews, B'nai Brith Canada, B.C. Supreme Court, BC HATE CRIME TEAM, BC Justice Minister Shirley Bond, Canadian Charter of Rights & Freedoms, Canadian Federation of Chabad Lubavitch, Canadian Human Rights Act, Canadian Human Rights Commission, Canadian Human Rights Tribunal, Canadian Identity/Sovereignty, Canadian Jewish Congress, Canadian Politics, CC Johnston, Chabad Lubavich Cult, Crown Council Jennifer Johnston, Cst Normandie Levas BC HATE CRIME TEAM, Det-Cst Terry Wilson BC HATE CRIME TEAM, Editor's Zone, Ernst Zundel, Fredrick Toben, Free Speech on the Internet, Freedom of Expression, Freedom of Speech, Freedom of Thought, Harry Abrams, Hasbara, Hate Crime laws, Hate Hunter Wilson, HOLODOMOR, Honourable Justice Morgan, Internet Freedom, Israeli Terrorism, Israeli War Crimes, Jewish Holocaust Industry, Jewish Lobby Groups, Jewish Media Monopoly, Jewish power, Jewish Racism, Jewish Supremacism, Jewish Talmudists, Jewish Terrorists, Jews, Jim Goad, Judaism, League for Human Rights of B'nai Brith Canada, Lonnie Landrud, MP Steven Harper War Criminal, National(Zionist)Post, Political Prisoners, Political Zionism, Quesnel BC, Quesnel Court House, Quesnel RCMP, RadicalPress.com, RCMP Corruption, Richard Warman, Rothschild Zionist Criminal Cartel, Royal Canadian Mounted Police, Sec. 319(2) CC "Willful Promotion of Hatred", Shylock, Taki's Magazine, The Babylonian Talmud, The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, Torah, Ukrainian Holocaust, World Zionist Organization, Zionism

Watch Human Rights Watch – A Tribute to Prof Richard Falk By Gilad Atzmon

December 23, 2012 by admin Leave a Comment

[EDITOR'S NOTE: NGO's around the world tend to be front organizations from the get go or else orgs arising from honest beginnings that were later infiltrated by Zionists and taken over in order to confuse and misdirect the energies of the masses who are truly interested in a world of peace and harmony where no one group (tribe) or organization has any more power than the people themselves. Thanks to former Jewish tribal members like Gilad Atzmon, who has successfully shifted his consciousness up and away from the ghetto consciousness of those who are transfixed by the Zionist ideology, we see how liberating one's mind and spirit from the confines of the Talmudic matrix-trap can be advantageous to all of humanity in that now he can view the machinations of the Zionist zealots from a perspective that truly makes sense and pass along his viewpoint to all of humanity.]

_________________________

http://www.gilad.co.uk/writings/watch-human-rights-watch-a-tribute-to-prof-richard-falk.html

Watch Human Rights Watch – A Tribute to Prof Richard Falk

By Gilad Atzmon

Saturday, December 22, 2012

This week we learned that Human Rights Watch (HRW) has expelled from its ranks top U.N. official Professor Richard Falk.

The juicy details have been kindly supplied by Israeli Hasbara outlet UN Watch blog.“We commend Human Rights Watch and its director Kenneth Roth for doing the right thing, and finally removing this enemy of human rights from their important organization,” said Hillel Neuer, a rabid Israeli supporter as well as Executive Director of UN Watch. “A man who supports the Hamas terrorist organization, and who was just condemned by the British Foreign Office for his cover endorsement of a virulently antisemitic book, has no place in an organization dedicated to human rights,”

Hasbara stooge that he is, Neuer, using every Zionist trick in the book, misinforms and misleads his readers. First of all, Hamas is not a ‘terrorist organisation’, it is a democratically elected government and the book to which Neuer refers is obviously mine – ‘The Wandering Who’ – which, was endorsed by Richard Falk and some of the most important humanists and scholars of our time– a book which has been a best-seller for six months in both Britain and the USA, has been translated into 10 languages and is available in seven editions in countries that all strictly legislate against any form of racial incitement as well Holocaust denial. The fact is that the Zionists and their ‘Progressive’ twins will have to accept that The Wandering Who is, after all, strictly kosher.

So, Professor Falk did indeed endorse my book and, like all my other endorsers, did not cave into pressure. This should indeed concern all Zionists and their agents.

“A transformative story told with unflinching integrity that all (especially Jews) who care about real peace, as well as their own identity, should not only read, but reflect upon and discuss widely.” Professor Richard Falk on The Wandering Who

But the problem is not the tribally oriented UN Watch and its Zionist Executive Director. After all, they only do what we expect Zionists to do – lie, harass, abuse, and, if necessary, fabricate evidence. No, far more interesting is the behaviour of the allegedly ‘progressive’ ‘Human Rights Watch’ and its director Kenneth Roth.

On the face of it, HRW is an independent, Non-Governmental Organisation (NGO) ‘dedicated to defending and protecting human rights’. But it takes no more than a few seconds of research to find out that the primary donor of the HRW is liberal-Zionist George Soros and his Open Society Foundation – the same Soros and ‘Open’ society that supports most Palestinian NGOs including BDS which may perhaps explain why the BDS in Ramallah was so eager to compromise on that most precious Palestinian right i.e. The Right of Return. Nor will it surprise you to learn that the same Soros funded HRW has been dedicated to the ‘exposing’ of Hamas’ failures on human rights issues? Is this not what you would expect from a liberal Zionist spin meister?

In my new satirical work, A Glossary of Zionist Power which I am now completing, I include entries for Soros and his Open Society. In the book, Soros is a ‘Jew who supports a lot of good causes that are also very good for the Jews’ and The Open Society Foundation ‘is dedicated to the transformation of deprived people into Guardian readers’. Surely I will now have to add an entry for the HRW and Roth. Both are nothing short of ‘Zionist fig-leaves’ and, like all Jewish progressive outlets that are dedicated to Jewish tribal and ethno centric campaigning, HRW is there to monitor, control and even stifle any criticism of Israel if it should ever get too close to the bone, i.e. touching on the Jewish character of the Jewish state,

Prof’ Falk had little chance of surviving within such a tribal milieu and the reason is pretty simple. Unlike Zionist Neuer, Liberal Zionist Soros, and ‘Anti-Zionist Zionist’ Roth, Professor Falk actually represents the ultimate success of the Zionist project. Early Zionism promised to transform the Jews into ‘people like all other people’. Zionism vowed to bring to life a Jew who transcends the tribal, a Jew who thinks universally and ethically. Early Zionists also believed that such a transformation could be achieved only in Palestine. Of course, they were wrong but no one can ignore the fact that the greatest and most prolific Jewish universalists are actually Israelis (Professor Yishayahu Leibovitch, Professor Israel Shahak, Nurit & Miko Peled, Gideon Levy, Amira Hass, Uri Avneri, Ilan Pappe, Israel Shamir and many, many more). But Professor Falk and a few others have managed to achieve a similar goal in the Diaspora. Those Jews whom we most admire and whose integrity we most trust such as Professor Norton Mezvinsky, Professor Norman Finkelstein, Professor Falk – all have something in common – they do not operate within Jews-only political cells. Unlike JVP, IJAN, HRW and Mondweiss, all of whom are dedicated primarily to promoting Jewish interests, they are dedicated to universal values.

So I argue that Professor Falk provides us with a glimpse into the possibility of true Jewish emancipation – the capacity to break out of the mental, intellectual and non-ethical ghetto. Moreover, this latest tale of HRW’s Herem (Kosher expulsion) of one of the greatest humanists of our generation is actually an educational event.

For many years, many of us saw Zionism and Israel as the mother and father of contemporary evil, but now, many of us have come to realise that Jewish progressive politics is every bit as sinister but, unlike Zionism that is only tainted with deception, the Jewish progressive discourse is inherently dishonest – it speaks universal but it thinks tribal.

While our disagreements with Israel and Zionism are clear, the Modus operandi adopted by AZZs and their relentless attempt to dominate the progressive discourse while, at the same time, stifling freedom of expression leaves more and more humanists suspicious of any form of Jewish politics – be it right, left or centre.

I like to think that my Wandering Who was the first attempt to discuss these issues openly. I wrote it because I, too, am a wanderer who decided, instead of dwelling on someone else’s land, to leave my homeland. Perhaps Professor Falk endorsed my work, because, like myself, he too is a wanderer. He self-reflects, examining his identity and his notion of justice from a transcendental point of view. Like myself, he is an artist, a poet, a man who searches, against all the odds, for beauty, peace and truth. On the other hand, George Soros’ Open Society Foundation contributed $100 million to HRW just to silence ethically and aesthetically driven souls such as Professor Falk and others.

—

The Wandering Who? A Study Of Jewish Identity Politics in general and Jewish progressive spin in particular Amazon.com or Amazon.co.uk

Filed Under: Alternative Media, Anti-ZionistCanada Yahoo Group, B'nai Brith Canada, Editor's Zone, Gaza Flotilla Massacre, George Soros-Zionist, Hamas, Hasbara, Human Rights Watch (HRW), Human Rights/orgs, Israel Shahak, Israeli War Crimes, Jewish Anti-Zionists, Jewish Hatred, Jewish Holocaust Lie, Jewish Lobby Groups, Jewish Media Monopoly, Jewish Racism, Jewish Supremacism, Judaism, League for Human Rights of B'nai Brith Canada, Norman Finkelstein, Palestine, Peace, Pharisaic Judaism, Political Prisoners, Political Zionism, Professor Richard Falk, Rothschild Zionist Criminal Cartel, sayanim, Sec. 319(2) CC "Willful Promotion of Hatred", The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, Ukrainian Holocaust, United Nations, World Zionist Organization, Zionism, Zionists

Radical Press Legal Update #7

December 20, 2012 by admin Leave a Comment

Radical Press Legal Update #7

Yesterday’s Bail Hearing was a three hour session in the Quesnel Court house.

The regular Judge who has been presiding over the various applications thus far was unable to attend and instead we had a female Judge by the name of M. Church who heard the application.

Crown of course had first kick at the cat and Crown Council Jennifer Johnston opened her remarks by giving Judge Church a brief overview of the case which included her reasons for why Crown has still not provided my lawyer with full disclosure in the case.

According to CC Johnston the period from my initial arrest on May 16, 2012 until October 9, 2012 had proven to be an insufficient time period in order to get enough evidence together so that an Indictment could be handed down by the October 9 deadline and that, apparently, somehow justified not providing Mr. Christie with full disclosure.

After the October 9 deadline I was no longer under the original bail conditions that restricted me from posting on my website although for some odd reason I didn’t become aware of this fact until close to 3 weeks after the fact .

The Crown eventually got their sworn information on November 5, 2012 and notified my lawyer that there would be a call date set for Nov. 6 where I was to appear in court. That date was subsequently changed to the 8th of November as Doug Christie was out in Saskatchewan attending to another case and couldn’t appear via telephone on the 6th. It was Crown’s letter to Mr. Christie on Nov. 5th that also informed him that Crown had asked for an endorsed warrant that would allow Crown to have all of the original bail conditions reinstated.

When I appeared on November 8, 2012 the Judge listened to both sides of the arguments and ruled that only some of the original conditions would remain i.e., those concerning my order not to have any contact with the two knaves (Warman and Abrams) who laid the alleged complaint to the RCMP and also the cops hanging on to my illegally stolen firearms. At the same time he set a new date of December 13, 2012 when Mr. Christie could be in court to represent me and Crown would be given the opportunity to argue for the reinstatement of the additional restrictions originally imposed on me by Det – Cst Terry Wilson on the day I got out of jail.

Of course December 13, 2012 proved to be bad timing weather wise and my lawyer was unable to fly into Quesnel that day so again a decision on Crown’s application was delayed for another week which brought it up to December 19, 2012 which was yesterday.

After running through that time line Crown then began their argument for wanting to reinstate the additional Orwellian restraints that would prohibit me from posting articles anywhere on the Internet available to the general public or to allow anyone else to post on any of my other websites that were owned by me.

Just prior to commencing her argument Crown Council Jennifer Johnston told Judge Church that unfortunately she hadn’t been able to provide Mr. Christie with the big fat 1″ thick bail disclosure document because she had been informed by Det – Cst Terry Wilson that when the Indictment was handed down the National Post had published an article on the case which contained statements that the reporter had gleaned from another website called FreeDominion.ca. Those statements were from what is called a “Warned” statement which is considered by the courts to be part of disclosure and therefore confidential information that is not supposed to be given out to the public. The Warned statement was a digital voice recording that Det – Cst Terry Wilson had made of his conversation with me just prior to my release from jail on May 16, 2012. Why IT was given to my lawyer when all the other disclosure documents are still being withheld by Crown is still a mystery to both myself and Mr. Christie but in the case of this particular document when I received a copy of it I didn’t realize it was confidential and had so I had shared it with an associate in a private email and unbeknownst to myself failed to notify them that it was confidential.

Anyhow a couple of quotes were taken from it and posted in the National Post and that was the big reason, according to CC Jennifer Johnston why she was refusing to divulge any more disclosure materials to Mr. Christie. This issue had come up on Dec. 13 when Crown was arguing before Judge Morgan that a second application had been filed regarding the matter of the illegal disclosure but no agreement could be found at the time and Mr. Christie had refused to agree to it.

At this point Crown told Judge Church that she would be willing to let Mr. Christie take a look at the bail disclosure document even though Crown’s application had not be resolved but that he would have to give it back at the end of the hearing! All of this was the typical Catch-22 scenarios that have been playing out since day one of this charade.

The Judge obviously knew that Mr. Christie couldn’t be expected to argue against something he hadn’t even seen so after a bit of discussion it was agreed that Crown would give Mr. Christie the disclosure document and a short 15 recess would be called so that he and I would have an opportunity to take a look at what Crown was planning to use in their argument for reinstating the original harsh bail conditions on me.

It only took about 5 minutes of perusing the document to realize what was going to be the Crown’s argument and we quickly went back and let the clerk know that the recess should end as soon as possible and court resume. Mr. Christie was well aware of the time constraints and needed every minute for his arguments.

Court resumed and Crown Council Johnston began her argument that I had been publishing all these articles, updates, etc. since November 2, 2012 (legally, mind you) and then proceeded to go through individual posts selecting various quotes to back up her position. It was the standard Zionist double-speak argument that posts were continuing to spread hate toward the Jews and Zionists and were attacking unfairly Det -Cst Terry Wilson and his partner-in-crime Cst Normandie Levas and thus possibly endangering their safety!

This went on until about 3 p.m. when she finally concluded her remarks and a break was taken before Mr. Christie was given time to present his arguments.

The issue of the leaked disclosure was addressed first and Mr. Christie told that Judge that he would have no problem with the Court issuing an Order stating that in future neither he nor myself would disclose any confidential information to any third parties not directly connected to the case and definitely not for publication.

Doug then commenced his argument with a bountiful supply of case law references and quickly outlined for the Judge some precedents which included the legal right for publishers and writers to criticize both Jews and Zionists citing articles in various mainstream publications like the New York Times and other Zionist controlled media. His point being that no particular group is exempt from criticism and that includes Jews or those who support political Zionism. Regarding my criticisms of the RCMP he also pointed out to the court that the RCMP were certainly not above criticism and given their public image of late he didn’t feel Crown’s argument in this regard was worthy of consideration.

He also made it crystal clear that what Crown was attempting to do flew in the face any and all statutes currently within the Canadian legal system. By that I mean Crown’s attempt to curtail my Charter Rights to freedom of expression and access to the Internet prior to my case being heard in a court of law and a decision being handed down as to whether or not I did in fact publish materials that were ultimately deemed to be “willful promotion of hatred” as contained in sec. 319(2) of the Canadian Criminal Code.

To a priori assume that whatever I am publishing is “hatred” and then ask the court to impose such severe curtailments upon my Charter rights prior to being tried is verboten and should not be considered as a reasonable argument.

During Crown’s argument CC Johnston had cited the Basi-Virk Trial (of all trials!) to back up some of her comments regarding the need to protect witnesses. In this instances she was trying to correlate my Warned statement conversation with Det – Cst Terry Wilson with that of secondary witnesses in the Basi-Verk case. When Doug came to this he quickly pointed out to the Judge the vast difference between witness evidence by anonymous third parties and statements directly given to the arresting officer by the accused as was the case in point regarding Crown’s argument.

One by one Mr. Christie countered Crown Council’s arguments and this went on until around 4:15 p.m. at which time Mr. Christie concluded his remarks by informing the Judge that he had a plane to catch before 5 p.m. and that he would have to stop. Doug asked me at this point to call the airport to confirm the exact time when the plane was leaving so I had to leave the court room for about five minutes.

While I was gone Crown apparently tried to refute all of Doug’s arguments and told the Judge that because I was charged with a “Hate” crime that Crown could then basically impose whatever restrictions they wanted to on me. The Judge apparently wasn’t convinced and just when I got back into the court room I heard her telling Crown and Defence that she would be considering the arguments and submitting a request to another body (not sure which one at this point) for further clarification come early January and then after that she would notify Crown and Defence of her decision.

So basically there will be no further bail conditions imposed on myself until January of 2013 at the earliest. We quickly packed up our things and drove Doug out to the airport where he bid us a fond fair well.

For now we will finally have a couple of weeks grace in order to relax a bit and enjoy the Christmas season.

——–

NOTE: Out of necessity I am forced to ask for financial assistance in this ongoing battle with the censors. Due to the fact that the Crown is refusing to give the required disclosure to my lawyer I am not able to furnish legal aid with the required documents that they demand before looking at whether or not I might qualify for legal financial assistance. This leaves me in the unenviable position of having to rely solely upon donations to pay for my legal expenses. The airfare alone yesterday for my lawyer to appear in court in Quesnel to defend me against these false charges was $1,050.00 return and given my minimal monthly pension it’s virtually impossible for me to cover these expenses.

As such I would once again implore readers to give serious consideration to helping me out by either sending a donation via PayPal using either a PayPal account or a credit card or else sending a cheque or Money Order to me via snail mail at the following postal address. Cash of course also works.

Arthur Topham
4633 Barkerville Highway
Quesnel, B.C.
Canada
V2J 6T8

To access my PayPal button please go to either the Home Page at http://www.radicalpress.com or my blog http://www.quesnelcariboosentinel.com The PayPal button is up on the right hand corner of the Home Page on either site.

Sincerely,

Arthur Topham
Pub/Ed
The Radical Press

Filed Under: "hate speech", Abrams/BBC v. Arthur Topham & RadicalPress.com, Alternative Media, Arthur Topham - Editor & Publisher, Attorney General of B.C., B'nai Brith, B'nai Brith Canada, B'nai Brith International, B.C. Criminal Justice Branch, Basi-Verk Trial, BC HATE CRIME TEAM, BC Justice Minister Shirley Bond, BC Rail Scandal, Canadian Charter of Rights & Freedoms, Canadian Free Speech League, Canadian Human Rights Act, Canadian Human Rights Commission, Canadian Identity/Sovereignty, Canadian Jewish Congress, Canadian Judicial System, Charter of Rights & Freedoms, Crown Council Jennifer Johnston, Cst Normandie Levas BC HATE CRIME TEAM, Det-Cst Terry Wilson BC HATE CRIME TEAM, Douglas H. Christie, Editor's Zone, Free Speech, Free Speech on the Internet, Freedom of Expression, Freedom of Speech, FreeDominion.ca, Harry Abrams, Hate Crime laws, Highway of Tears, Internet Freedom, Jewish Lobby Groups, Judge M. Church, Judge Morgan, National Post, National(Zionist)Post, Political Prisoners, Political Zionism, Quesnel BC, Quesnel Court House, Quesnel RCMP, Radical Press, RCMP Corruption, Richard Warman, Rothschild Zionist Criminal Cartel, Sec. 319(2) CC "Willful Promotion of Hatred", The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, Zionism

B’nai Brith, ADL, Child Porn, Regina and Arthur Topham by Arthur Topham

December 17, 2012 by admin 1 Comment

B’nai Brith, ADL, Child Porn, Regina and Arthur Topham

Arthur Topham

December 17, 2012

From the very beginning of my longstanding legal battle with B’nai Brith Canada and the International Jewish Lobby it has been my intention to point a fierce yet truthful finger at World Jewry: the primary purpose being to bring to the forefront for Canadians the true identity and purpose of these front organizations that the Zionists have set up over the past couple of centuries to deceive the gullible goyim (non-Jews) on multiple levels.

A prime example of how, like clockwork, Zionists inevitably resort to the same tactics over and over, is the recent behaviour by the Crown in my upcoming sec. 319(2) CCC “Hate Crime” case involving B’nai Brith Canada and the RCMP’s Det-Cst Terry Wilson of the “BC HATE CRIME TEAM”.

In my last Legal Update #6 published on December 14, 2012 reference was made to the fact that I would publish an article related to the subject of this incident that took place (again) during my last court appearance on December 13, 2012).

Since the onset of the false allegations brought on by Richard Warman and Harry Abrams of B’nai Brith Canada that led to my arrest on May 16, 2012 the Crown has done its damnedest to portray me in a false and negatively perverse light.

Beginning with my first appearance in the Quesnel court room Crown Council Jennifer Johnston immediately began her vilification of my person by resorting to “case law” (examples from former court cases used as precedents that purported prove similar intent and purpose) that equated the cases referenced by her to my own situation with respect to the articles which I have posted on RadicalPress.com.

The “case” in point here being the Crown’s feeble and malicious attempt to suggest to the presiding Judge that articles published on RadicalPress.com are of the same revulsive caliber as photographs and videos of child pornography and sexual abuse that are illegally posted on the Internet and exchanged between perverts via email and that when it comes to any consideration on the part of the Judge as to the degree and severity of bail conditions that ought to be imposed upon me during the course of this bolshevik show trial that this fallacious argument on Crown’s part ought to be given serious consideration so that I would not be permitted to continue to post anything further on the website or possibly even be permitted to email friends and associates.

This, dear lover of freedom of speech, is the degree of chutzpah (arrogance) and deception which permeates not only the mindset of the Jewish lobbies around the world but also that supposedly impartial, independent and august body within Canada’s judicial system (the Crown) which is currently doing the bidding of this foreign agent of Israel – B’nai Brith Canada.

One of the hallmarks of Zionist thinking is to turn whatever truth exists upon its head and then attempt to portray the actual perpetrator of a crime as the innocent victim and nowhere will you find a better example than in the case of sexual perversion, child pornography, deviancy of all types and the secretive masonic order known to the world as B’nai Brith.

I might add too at this point that it’s a known fact, boldly and unabashedly announced by the perpetrators themselves, that the global porn industry was initiated by and has been controlled by Jews since the very beginning. Anyone doubting this need only type into the Google search engine the aforementioned topic and they will find this simple fact out for themselves.

In my own case because of these false allegations made against my person, my life’s work and Truth itself I will site two precedent setting cases that show both the hypocrisy and the deceit that this purportedly “benevolent Jewish society” has projected upon the public’s perception via their controlled media over the past century.

The first is a recent incident that actually took place at the time when I was battling with the Canadian Human Rights Act’s sec. 13(1) complaint that Harry Abrams and the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada had filed against me back in 2007.

During the course of that long and protracted exchange of arguments and motions that eventually led to a decision by the Canadian Human Rights Commission to uphold and lend credence to the complaint; one which eventually moved the case into the hands of the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal (another communist/zionist style, quasi-judicial body of appointed Zionists doing the bidding of their taskmasters from Israel) B’nai Brith’s touted moral superiority and unblemished integrity suffered a serious blow when one of their former Canadian directors of B’nai Brith Quebec, Bill Surkis, was arrested and charged on May 29, 2009 with possession of 86 videos containing close to nine hours of footage showing men engaged in sexual abuse of under children between the ages of six and fourteen. On top of the videos were an additional 153 photos also showing children being abused.

To add insult to injury Surkis’s lawyer Steven Slimovich (no pun intended!) at first attempted to convince the Crown that his client had all this porn on his computer for “The purpose of his viewing the child pornography material [in order] to educate himself on the topic of child pornography” so that afterwards he would be able to “go into schools and give lectures on people abusing people.”! That, I suggest, is the sort of chutzpah one continually confronts whenever this touted “benevolent” front organization gets caught with its pants down.

Of course even the Crown in this instance couldn’t pretend to fall for such a scam and they had to prosecute Surkis but given the severity of the charges: all three – possessing, accessing and distributing of child pornography – each carrying a maximum penalty on conviction of 10 years in prison, the final outcome of the trial which included plea bargaining to drop the “distributing child pornography” charge was one that showed the powerful influence of the Jewish lobby when it comes to protecting one of their own.

Out of a total of possibly 30 years imprisonment for the three initial charges what did this former registered lobbyist and Quebec Regional Director of B’nai Brith Canada, board chairman for the Holocaust Memorial Museum and Academic Dean of John Abbott College for 22 years receive as punishment for his crimes? Why a grand total of 45 days in jail to be served on weekends, the minimum sentencing allowed under the law!

Oi veh is all I can say!

Yet in my own case, where a conviction for a said sec. 319(2) CCC “Hate Crime” carries a maximum 2 year sentence, do you think that were the Crown to win their case that they would sentence me to say a relatively similar punishment of 5 to 10 days in jail to be served on weekends? Fat chance!

And so it’s fairly evident by now, given Crown Council Jennifer Johnston’s repeated references to Judge Morgan directly associating RadicalPress.com’s articles with child pornography, that her motive is designed to convince the Judge that extremely severe restrictions are justified and must be imposed upon me to prohibit me from writing and publishing any further (pornographic?) articles in my own defence or providing updated information to my long list of supporters and donors who are helping me (and themselves) in this battle to retain my Charter right to freedom of speech on the Internet.

One final irksome comment in this regard. Sturkis’ lawyer Slimovich also did his best to insure that his client, a “stellar” member of his Jewish community, who he stated was a “staunch individual” who “stood up for what is right” would not lose his privilege of retaining his home computer so that he could “continue to serve” his community. Whether he gained that right I was at this point unable to determine.

The second example is one that I will touch upon only briefly but will furnish readers with an url to a website where they can read about it in depth so as to understand the duration of time that has passed since this “benevolent” charity called B’nai Brith that has been fronting as a philanthropy organization for the past hundred years and longer first began their attempts at covering the blood soaked tracks of their membership via the use of their mainstream media propaganda mechanisms using both print and television to gain their dubious ends.

Today the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) of B’nai Brith is the foremost American Jewish watch dog and lobbyist for the state of Israel and for support of the Zionist ideology that buttresses said state’s political doctrines. Its influence in the USA is notoriously well known and its victims are legion since its inception back in the year 1913. The following “case” exposes the history behind why B’nai Brith created the ADL in the first place and it serves as yet another reminder of what this essay is trying to do, i.e. expose B’nai Brith’s true identity and its historic links with pedophelia.

Back in 1913 the United States of America witnessed a rather grizzly murder trial involving a Jew by the name of Leo M. Frank who was the owner of a sweat shop Pencil Company that employed young girls. Leo M. Frank was also president of the Atlanta, Georgia, Gate City [masonic] Lodge 144 Chapter of B’nai B’rith which had about 500 members. The controversy surrounding his sensational trial and subsequent conviction has been ongoing with the ADL still attempting to exonerate the pedophile sex killer as late as 1986.

I highly suggest that readers take a look at the website which exposes all the machinations surrounding this historic trial. It can be found at the following url: http://www.leofrank.org/introduction-to-leo-frank/

I believe these two examples given in this essay are reason enough to challenge Crown Council Jennifer Johnston’s erroneous assertions that she is putting forth in court which suggest that my work and the information contained on RadicalPress.com are somehow related to pedophilia and child pornography when the facts suggest that those who were involved in laying the complaint against me are the ones who ought to be ashamed and embarrassed by the ongoing behaviour of their own members in this highly suspect and shady Jewish lobby organization that is aggressively pursuing its agenda of supporting these so-called “Hate Crimes” in order to silence any criticism of themselves or of the state of Israel and its ideology of Zionism.

I’m sure there will be more to report on this issue as the trial unfolds.

—–

Filed Under: Abe Foxman, Abrams/B'nai Brith Canada v. Arthur Topham and RadicalP, ADL, Alternative Media, Anti-Defamation League (ADL), B'nai Brith, B'nai Brith Canada, B'nai Brith International, BC HATE CRIME TEAM, Bill Surkis, Canadian Human Rights Act, Canadian Human Rights Commission, Canadian Human Rights Tribunal, Canadian Identity/Sovereignty, Canadian Jewish Congress, Canadian Jewish Defense League, Canadian Judicial System, Charter of Rights & Freedoms, Child Pornography, Cst Normandie Levas BC HATE CRIME TEAM, Det-Cst Terry Wilson BC HATE CRIME TEAM, Douglas H. Christie, Editor's Zone, Free Speech, Free Speech on the Internet, Freedom of Expression, Freedom of Speech, Harry Abrams, Hate Crime laws, Highway of Tears, Holocaust Memorial Museum, Internet Freedom, Jewish Defense League (JDL), Jewish Freemasons, Jewish Lobby Groups, Jewish Media Monopoly, Jewish Porn Industry, Jewish Supremacism, Judge Morgan, Leo M. Frank, Political Prisoners, Political Zionism, Quesnel BC, Quesnel Court House, Quesnel RCMP, Radical Press, RadicalPress.com, RCMP Corruption, Regina, Richard Warman, Rothschild Banking syndicate, Rothschild Zionist Criminal Cartel, Rothschilds, Sec. 319(2) CC "Willful Promotion of Hatred", Section 13/CHR Act, Steven Slimovich, Supreme Court of Canada, The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, World Jewry, World Zionist Organization

TEN STEPS TO SUBVERSION by Eva Lyman

December 17, 2012 by admin Leave a Comment

TEN STEPS TO SUBVERSION

E. Lyman

“A general Dissolution of Principles and Manners will more surely overthrow the Liberties of America than the whole force of the Common Enemy. “While the People are virtuous they cannot be subdued; but when once they lose their Virtue they will be ready to surrender their Liberties to the first external or internal invader. … If Virtue and Knowledge are diffused among the People, they will never be enslaved. This will be their great Security.” Samuel Adams (Former US President)

Too often, local and world affairs appear to be unfolding as if someone were following a master script. In this context, these “ten steps to subversion” are fascinating.

Said to have been found in Dusseldorf, Germany, by Allied Forces in 1919, they were then printed in the U.S. in the Bartlesville Examiner-Enterprise (Oklahoma). Another source labels these “Communist Rules for the Russian Revolution, 1918″. In 1946, the attorney general of Florida obtained them from a known member of the Communist Party, who acknowledged that the “rules” were then still a part of the Communist program for the United States. Nearly the same text was found in the purportedly 18th century Illuminati Protocols (labeled fake but written by someone).

Curiously, this plan fits in with recent times and seems to parallel the government and corporate agenda of today.

1. Corrupt the young: Get them away from spirituality. Get them interested in sex. Make them superficial; destroy their ruggedness.

Some people not in the “young” age group might say this trend has been going on for a long time. For example, blatant sex can be seen in most advertising — so much so that it is difficult to remember when it was otherwise.

The operative goal here is a moral corruption of youth through excessively materialistic values, resulting in overwhelming superficiality. If a whole generation grows up to be concerned only about one’s personal benefit and enjoyment — the enjoyment being based on material possessions and superficial immediate gratification — society will not find it easy to fight for the survival of the community or the nation. It will be a fractured society, one that would be easy to take over and control by force.

We need to be aware of this goal and try to mitigate against it. Some may say that today’s youth have already gone in the direction of this first goal. But there is always a percentage who are more deeply aware and who will fight for higher visions.

2. Get control of all means of publicity.

By making one or two corporations control all the print media, and also television, this goal is being achieved.

3. Get people’s minds off their government by focusing their attention on athletics, sexy books, plays, and immoral movies.

This one, again, sounds dated, but the concept isn’t. How about, “Get people’s minds off what the government’s backers are making it do, by offering a great many sports on TV, and a multitude of soap operas and sitcoms liberally laced with sex, violence and scandal. In the news (TV and print media), feature as much news as possible about disasters, violence and murder. Don’t, however, print any news that would allow people to piece together what is really going on in the world.

4. Divide the people into hostile groups by constantly harping on controversial matters of no importance.

We see this all the time. In B.C., one of the favourite topics to divide communities relate to land claims and indigenous rights. In 1995, we had a classic example in the Gustafsen Lake stand-off. The mainstream media made people believe that the Native sovereigntists were “after your private property”. Even after the Mounties self-condemned themselves in a “training video”, where they said they wanted to “smear the Indians” and make themselves “look good”, the disinformation continued in the major media.

Other popular divisive topics are illegal refugees, immigration, taxes, and various irrelevant aspects of government. Important issues that affect democracy and sovereignty — like the global corporate takeover via so-called “trade” deals where, for example, transnationals can sue governments but people cannot sue corporations — are never discussed. Nor are the real goals behind globalization. All we are told is that it is inevitable and it is good for us.

5. Destroy the people’s faith in their natural leaders by holding the latter up to contempt, ridicule and disgrace.

One popular way to destroy people’s faith in their leaders is to marginalize these leaders by giving them no media access. We have seen this in connection with leaders of new political parties. During the last two federal elections, one of Canada’s elder statesmen, the Honourable Paul Hellyer, a former deputy prime minister, was deliberately humiliated by not being allowed in on the “major” leaders’ debates — because “minor” parties were not deemed to be of importance.

Potential leaders are also marginalized by being made to seem unreliable or lightweight. David Orchard is a young, charismatic “natural” leader. He has been pushed aside, even though he came second in a democratic vote for the leadership of the Progressive Conservative Party.

This list could go on. The practice is particularly common, even in the Native community where hereditary chiefs have been shunted out of power, replaced by government/corporate protégés.

6. Always preach true democracy, but seize power as fast and as ruthlessly as possible.

We have a brilliant example of this in the recent U.S. presidential election. Both George W. Bush and Vice-president Al Gore extolled American democracy in the face of a blatant power grab. Massive electoral irregularities in the State of Florida gave the presidency to Mr. Bush. However, subsequent informal counts have shown that Bush did not win the state or the nation. Nevertheless, he has been ensconced in the White House.

7. By encouraging government extravagance, destroy its credit, produce years of inflation with rising prices and general discontent.

We have seen a rise in the public debt since our federal government moved away from using the publicly owned Bank of Canada to finance its expenditures, thus increasing private borrowing with interest. Inflationary interest rates in the ‘80s cost many Canadians their homes and businesses. After the introduction of the FTA and NAFTA, the country has never recovered. The floodgate was opened to the foreign takeover of Canadian resources, with the accompanying loss of sovereignty. It is correct to say that many Canadians are not content with the situation, but they are not sure how to fix it.

8. Incite unnecessary strikes in vital industries, encourage civil disorders and foster a lenient and soft attitude on the part of the government toward such disorders.

We saw this plan in Canada in the 1970s. The lenient attitude was evident when large wage increases were permitted, unrelated to any growth in productivity, and a subsequent inflation in prices. Although it is denied, inflation continues today, to the detriment of people on fixed incomes.

9. Cause breakdown of the old moral values — honesty, sobriety, self-restraint, faith in the pledged word, ruggedness.

These values were once dear to almost any thriving traditional society, having strong currency in European and North American society as recently as 100 years ago.

The Indigenous nations of North America lived by these moral values. Clearly one could not survive in the natural context without being able to trust one’s neighbours. Neighbours helped neighbours; clan helped clan. A family was a self-sufficient unit when it came to the procurement of food, shelter and clothing.

In the urban context, this simple equation has disappeared, replaced by an impersonal government and, increasingly, corporate infrastructure. Aside from being impersonal, this infrastructure is not responsive to the real needs of the individual citizen or family.

In this manner, self-sufficiency and ruggedness are lost in the metropolitan area context. If some disaster caused the loss of the supply infrastructure in our cities, people would starve because they’ve lost the skills of finding food for themselves. And due to huge rates of immigration, our numbers are inflated to the point that we could not put everyone out on the land to fend for themselves. Raiding parties would attack rural areas, causing starvation even where the food is grown. Corporate mega farms would become military encampments. Those pillaging for leftovers would be shot on sight. This actually happened under Communism in the Ukraine in the 1930s, with a loss of two million lives.

Whoever controls the food supply and drinking water is the complete master of all. The corporations are more aware of this than the average citizen, and they are busy modifying the food supply so that it can be controlled through patents — owned by the holders of the patents. Water is being commodified to give control to the transnational corporations. The current legal action under NAFTA by Sunbelt Water of California against Canada and B.C. is only the first salvo in the water wars. Recently a traditional chief revealed that bulk water exports are already taking place from the mid-coast regions.

10. Cause the registration of all firearms on some pretext, with a view to confiscate them and leaving the populace helpless.

This final step is in progress in Canada today, under the pretext of reducing crime. Australia has already travelled this road and given the lie to this excuse. They have had rising violence and crime after their guns were confiscated. In every recent dictatorship, guns have been taken from the people. It is the final step of a global plan.

This plan appears to be the essence of the New World Order and the global corporate power grab. It requires no stretch of the imagination to believe that it is being used against Canadians today by its federal government.

Only awareness and concerted counter-action can hope to alter this plan. In the long term, it spells disaster for mankind.

Filed Under: Communism, Editor's Zone, Eva Lyman, Gun Control, Gustafsen Lake stand-off, The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion

Radical Press Legal Update #6

December 14, 2012 by admin 1 Comment

Dear Supporters of a Free Internet and Freedom of Speech,

Please bear with me as this update will be a bit longer than normal but I think highly informative as well.

It’s been two weeks since I last gave an update on my court case involving B’nai Brith Canada (aka Regina) versus Arthur Topham and RadicalPress.com, a pivotal, precedent-setting legal case that will ultimately determine whether Canada will succumb to the likes of all those other so-called “democratic” countries like Germany, France, Spain, Australia, etc. who have been co-opted by the Rothschild criminal cartel and now have their freedom of speech curtailed by “HATE CRIME” laws that don’t permit any questioning of either the rogue and racist state of Israel or any other aspect of the Zionist Jew agenda to turn the world into a giant gulag ruled over by the Star of David.

To say the least this session was particularly crazy in a number of ways.

First off we awoke in the early morning to find ourselves in the midst of a major snow storm! That meant getting the driveway cleared so we could get into town to attend court and as there was no time for me to shovel the 300 foot swath to the Barkerville Hwy we had to call the neighbour and get him to come over with his snow-clearing machine.

Meanwhile I tried to call my lawyer Doug Christie to check on things but I was unable to reach him on his cell phone. The court time for the bail hearing was set for 1:30 p.m. I called the local airport to see if Doug’s flight was still on schedule only to find that it wasn’t happening. As it turned out the plane made it from Vancouver International airport as far as Williams Lake (the next city about 90 km south of Quesnel), circled for awhile and then due to poor visibility was forced to return to Vancouver.

Realizing this of course created a number of questions in terms of what might occur when we got to the courthouse in Quesnel.

Upon reaching town over roads that were in dire need of plowing we went into the government building where the courts are located around 1 p.m. only to find the place basically empty with the exception of some supporters who had come to view the session. I went upstairs to the court registry to see what was up and was told that it wouldn’t be happening until 2 p.m. and that Mr. Christie would be appearing via telephone instead of in person. I knew right then that we would be encountering some difficulties as my lawyer and I had already discussed the importance of him being there in the flesh in the courtroom due to the strident actions of Crown council during the last session on November 30th.

Having a few minutes to kill, my wife and I went for a quick bite before the court resumed.

There are normally a number of different cases on the docket during the afternoon but on this day my case was the only one so the gallery was empty except for one mysterious elderly woman who was in attendance. She was probably in her mid to late 70?s and appeared to be following my wife and I around as we awaited the opening of the doors leading into the court room. My immediate impression was that she was a local sayanim (Isreali supporter and operative) sent out by B’nai Brith to observe the session.

Crown council Jennifer Johnston was there raring to go as usual with her mountains of files and folders stacked up on the table below the Judge’s bench. While we sat quietly awaiting the Judge’s entrance into the room CC Johnston added a new prop to her planned submission to the Judge by setting up an additional little podium on the table that looked a bit like a soap box or a preacher’s pulpit where I assumed she would be placing her papers and her Criminal Code book as she commenced her flamboyant actions against me on behalf of Rothschild’s front organization B’nai Brith Canada.

Judge Morgan, the Judge who has been sitting in on this charade for the majority of the sessions of late, came in and court immediately commenced the clerk having already called Mr. Christie on his cell phone a few minutes prior to the Judge appearing.

Crown council Johnston immediately rattled off the case numbers and proceeded to get right into it but the Judge had to soon interrupt her and allow Mr. Christie to state some things regarding the defence’s side of the issue.

During the last session on November 30th Mr. Christie had reiterated, as he has been reiterating for the past 6 months now, that he is STILL awaiting Disclosure from the Crown. What that means for those unfamiliar with court room procedure is that he has not received from the Crown the documents which state what exactly it is that I am being charged with, what the sentencing is that the Crown is asking and what the contents or evidence is that the Crown is planning to use in their offensive efforts to convict me of this spurious “HATE CRIME” also known as sec. 319(2) of the Criminal Code of Canada. This procedure of furnishing the defence with the Disclosure is standard practise in all litigation yet the Crown has been stalling and stalling and back-pedalling on the issue since I was first arrested on May 16th, 2012.

During the November 30th session Judge Morgan had asked Crown council to get the Disclosure documents to Mr. Christie by no later a date than December 11th, 2012 so that he would have (a very limited amount of) time to study the charges and prepare to address the proposed arguments of Crown as they pertained to the bail conditions which CC Johnston is hell-bent on imposing upon me. Well, as usual, this again didn’t happen and instead Mr. Christie got word at the last minute that instead of receiving the required information Crown council was now making an additional Application to the Judge wherein the Crown would be attempting to restrict Mr. Christie from divulging the contents of the Disclosure to his client, me!

Why you might reasonably ask? Allow me to explain. When the formal charge was handed down on November 5th, 2012 the Zionist controlled media in Canada were on it like a dog on a bone and all the major print media and Canada’s largest TV media, SunNews Network, were spreading their excremental slurs and the usual vilifying statements about me and my website around the country. In the case of the National Post aka the Zionist National Post as I prefer to call it, their intrepid reporter Stewart Bell had published some quotes from a document which another website, FreeDominion.ca had published on a thread on their forum. The quotes in question were extracts taken from what is called a “Warned Statement”. Allow me to explain what that is.

Prior to Det – Cst Terry Wilson of the BC HATE CRIME TEAM (the Zionist created police hit squad that orchestrated my arrest and that also works in tandem with Richard Warman and Harry Abrams of B’nai Brith Canada – the two Zionist B’nai Brith agents who filed the sec. 319(2) charge against me) releasing me from jail on May 16, 2012 he and I went to a small interview room where he “interviewed” me in order to solicit further “evidence” to be used against me. I ought to have listened to my lawyer and told Wilson to stuff his interview up where the sun doesn’t shine but of course I didn’t and decided to humour him and gave him some facts to counter all the bullshit that he was spewing forth during our talk; bs that was pure Zionist disinformation most likely planted in Wilson lightning struck brain by Richard Warman and Harry Abrams after decades of conspired with Warman back in Ontario (more on that in a subsequent post).

Anyhow, Wilson went back to his office in Surrey with his digital recording device in hand and proceeded over the next couple of months to transcribe it into text. Eventually (this is still not clear yet) he disclosed it to my lawyer Mr. Christie who, in turn, sent me a copy and unbeknownst to myself I didn’t realize that the document was confidential. Given that Crown Council has yet to disclose anything else it begs the question as to why Wilson would have given this document to Mr. Christie in the first place. After I read it through I sent it to the owner of the FreeDominion.ca website Connie Fournier in a private email to discuss some relevant issues to do with Det. Wilson in order to help me in my defence against these trumped up charges. My reason for doing this was quite simple. Richard Warman has been filing charges against Connie and Mark Fournier for a number of years now and dragging them through court appearance after court appearance in order to stop them from publishing information related to his outrageous behaviour with respect to in the ongoing battle over the infamous sec. 13(1) provision in the Canadian Human Rights Act that’s been taking place on the web for a number of years now. Warman is Canada’s #1 serial complainer working for B’nai Brith Canada and any other Jewish lobby group in the country always ready and willing to charge critics of Israel with “hate crime” offences and tie them up in endless litigation and then having obtained a conviction he reaps the financial rewards that come with the victim having to pay outrageous fines. Being a lawyer himself and having worked for the Canadian Human Rights Commission for a number of years Warman’s reputation for infiltrating websites and forums using false aliases in order to post “hateful” and “racist” comments and then turning around and charging the website owner with a sec. 13(1) “hate crime” complaint are well documented and known internationally. It’s all part of an ongoing program initiated by B’nai Brith International to censor the Internet via the creation and implantation of “hate crime” legislation in the law books of unsuspecting democracies.

Well, as it turns out our sleuth Det Wilson has been collaborating with this same serial sidewinder Warman for years now pulling off on others precisely what they pulled off in my case, that is, coming up with some phoney “evidence” furnished to them by B’nai Brith Canada via Harry Abrams their BC sayanim agent and then arresting the person and stealing their computers and copying all the information off of their hard drive and subsequently using the Canadian court system and the Zionist controlled media to first vilify the person and afterwards strive to find them guilty in the “human rights” tribunals (modelled on the Stalinist show trials of the 1930?s) of “spreading ‘hatred’ toward Jews and citizens of Israel”. Once those steps have been taken they then proceed to fine the shit out of their victim and order them to take down their websites and also issue cease and desist orders preventing the victim from publishing any further truth about B’nai Brith’s sinister actions. Warman of course greedily collects his blood money, pockets it and then proceeds to look for another website to sucker in to his hate crime scam. This has been the modus operandi of the Jewish lobby groups here in Canada for decades and began as soon as they were able to surreptitiously configure their “hate crime” legislation into Canada’s statutes via their sayanim Jewish Supreme Court Justices (Irwin Cotler being the primary Zionist agent and former Liberal Attorney General of Canada) and all the rest of their pro-Zionist lawyers and sycophants working on “commissions” and behind the scenes.

Anyhow, getting back to the scene of the crime de jure and what happened as a result of Connie Fournier( also unaware of its confidential status), posting this document on her website in the form of a pdf. Crown council Jennifer Johnston is now attempting to use that as an argument against my lawyer and an excuse for her holding back on sending Mr. Christie the long awaited disclosure and second to file an additional Application to stop Mr. Christie from sharing any additional information regarding the Crown’s charges with me, the accused.

Then, to add insult to injury, she held up documents before the Judge saying that she did have the necessary information sitting on her computer just waiting (at the click of a button as she remarked) to send to Mr. Christie but of course she had to have the new Application approved beforehand so she could sleep at night knowing that Mr. Topham wouldn’t be privy to it and go and post it on someone’s website!

Some of course might think it lame and some lame-brained on her part to expect that Mr. Christie be subjected to such an outrageous set of conditions given the fact that the Crown itself hasn’t disclosed a damn bit of information from the get go! But given all the antics on the part of CC Johnston thus far in this little mini-series nothing that she attempts comes as too great a surprise. Mr. Christie of course outright rejected Crown’s claims and also argued that there were mitigating circumstances regarding the “Warned Statement” that needed to be addressed when he could be in court in person.

Mr. Christie then asked the Judge to set another date for these matters to argued as obviously Crown was making it supremely difficult for him to do anything without first receiving disclosure.

Then something occurred which bears mentioning as it’s not the first time that Crown council Johnston has pulled this stunt. When she began stating to the Judge that the Crown needed to get additional bail conditions imposed on me asap she held up in her hand a booklet that Wilson had prepared of all the posts I had placed on my website since November 2, 2012 when I first learned that I was able to do so legally. I gather it is one of his prime sources of entertainment an a justification for his otherwise unearned pay cheque when he’s not busy snooping about in all my private emails that he stole from me back in May. One could see that to to her way of thinking she had in hand all the solid evidence needed to prove that I was continuing to publish “willful hatred” toward Jews and Zionists and that because of all these posts (up to at least November 30) it was imperative that I be restricted from using my website and posting my articles, news reports, other articles, political cartoons and unrelated stories.

This business of trying to misinform the Judge while at the same time intimidate me into somehow feeling guilty for doing what I’ve been doing for the past fourteen years of publishing is as pathetic as it is laughable. She still hasn’t twigged on the fact that I run an alternative News Service and that posting articles is what one does when providing such a venue for readers. It’s as if I’m supposed to hang my head in shame because these Zionist psychopaths have alleged that I’m a hate mongering anti-Semite and tuck my tail between my legs and slink off into the underbrush somewhere to await my conviction! My God! Is the degree of intelligence that our legal beagles are functioning at? If so, heaven help the nation.

It was then that Judge Morgan began to repeat early statements and false accusations by Crown council Johnston (in her zeal to convince the Judge of the dastardly deeds I supposedly was committing), that what I was writing and publishing might be comparable to a website that was publishing child pornography and therefore had to be stopped as soon as possible. Child pornography!!! I couldn’t at that point help but groan and Mr. Christie was quick to rebut such statements stating to Judge Morgan that this was an unfair and inapplicable comparison. (Again, I will address this issue further in a separate article). The Judge listened to Mr. Christie’s argument and tended to agree although Crown council Johnston must have got a chuckle out of having influenced him to the point where he was beginning to regurgitate the same standard Zionist double-talk and lies that CC Johnston was attempting to use.

Given all the disjointed and conflicting accusations and misinformation that were colliding in the court room Judge Morgan suggested that court adjourn for half an hour so that Crown and Defence could speak privately and try to come to some agreement over the contentious issues at hand and also so Mr. Christie could speak with me as well. This was around 2:30 p.m. We took a half hour break and returned to the court room at 3:00 p.m.

There was no possibility of Mr. Christie agreeing to anything that Crown council Johnston was proposing and so when court resumed Mr. Christie and Crown council Johnston along with Judge Morgan began to look at future dates where Mr. Christie could be in court to argue the case. A date of Wednesday, December 19, 2012 at 1:30 p.m. was agreed upon by all parties and Judge Morgan then ended the session.

Stay tuned folks! It can only get more interesting as this 2012 freedom of speech farce continues to unfold.

—–

NOTE: Again I would ask of readers that they try to assist me financially in my battle with the censors by sending donations to the cause. Due to the fact that the Crown is refusing to give the required disclosure to my lawyer I am not able to furnish legal aid with the required documents that they demand before looking at whether or not I might qualify for legal financial assistance. This leaves me in the unenviable position of having to rely solely upon donations to pay for my legal expenses and while I have been receiving some assistance from a few kind souls who realize the importance of this case to all Canadians the amount of money thus sent comes nowhere near that necessary to pay for my lawyer to appear in court in Quesnel to defend me against these false charges.

As such I would once again implore readers to give serious consideration to helping me out by either sending a donation via PayPal using either a PayPal account or a credit card or else sending a cheque or Money Order to me via snail mail at the following postal address. Cash of course also works.

Arthur Topham
4633 Barkerville Highway
Quesnel, B.C.
Canada
V2J 6T8

Sincerely,

Arthur Topham
Pub/Ed
The Radical Press

Filed Under: "hate speech", Abrams/BBC v. Arthur Topham & RadicalPress.com, Alternative Media, Anti-Defamation League (ADL), Arthur Topham - Editor & Publisher, B'nai Brith Canada, B'nai Brith International, Babylonian Talmud, BC HATE CRIME TEAM, Canadian Association for Free Expression (CAFE), Canadian Charter of Rights & Freedoms, Canadian Council for Israel and Jewish Advocacy (CIJA), Canadian Free Speech League, Canadian Human Rights Act, Canadian Human Rights Commission, Canadian Human Rights Tribunal, Canadian Identity/Sovereignty, Canadian Jewish Congress, Canadian Jewish Defense League, Canadian Judicial System, CC Johnston, Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Connie Fournier, Crown Council Jennifer Johnston, Cst Normandie Levas BC HATE CRIME TEAM, Det-Cst Terry Wilson BC HATE CRIME TEAM, Douglas H. Christie, Editor's Zone, Ernst Zundel, Ezra Levant, Fredrick Toben, Free Speech on the Internet, Freedom of Expression, Freedom of Speech, FreeDominion.ca, FreeDominion.com.pa, Harry Abrams, Hate Crime laws, Internet Freedom, Irwin Cotler, Israeli Terrorism, Israeli War Crimes, Jewish Defense League (JDL), Jewish Freemasons, Jewish Holocaust Industry, Jewish Lobby Groups, Jewish Media Monopoly, Jewish Porn Industry, Jewish Racism, Jewish Supremacism, Jewish Terrorists, Judge Morgan, League for Human Rights of B'nai Brith Canada, National(Zionist)Post, PM Stephen Harper, Political Prisoners, Political Zionism, Quesnel Court House, Quesnel RCMP, Radical Press, RadicalPress.com, RCMP Corruption, Richard Warman, Rothschild, Rothschild Banking syndicate, Rothschild Zionist Criminal Cartel, Sec. 319(2) CC "Willful Promotion of Hatred", Section 13/CHR Act, Statement of Particulars, SunTV News Network, Supreme Court of Canada, The Controversy of Zion, The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, The Radical Press, Ukrainian Holocaust, World Zionist Organization, Zionism, Zionist Atrocities, Zionist Jews in Russia

When Jews Rule the World by Brother Nathanael of RealJewNews

December 11, 2012 by admin Leave a Comment

Please click HERE to view Brother Nathanael’s video

Filed Under: Abe Foxman, ADL, American Jewish Committee, Anti Defamation League, B'nai Brith International, Brother Nathanael, Federal Reserve Bank, Gentiles, Jewish Freemasons, Jewish Global News Service, Jewish Holocaust Industry, Jewish Lobby Groups, Jewish Media Monopoly, Jewish Porn Industry, Jewish power, Jewish Supremacism, Jews Behind Bolshevik Revolution, Political Zionism, Rothschild Banking syndicate, Rothschild syndicate, Rothschild Zionist Criminal Cartel, The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, Twin Towers/911, World Zionist Organization, Zionism, Zionist Atrocities

Two Gulags: A second warning to the West by Arthur Topham

December 11, 2012 by admin 6 Comments

Two Gulags: A second warning to the West

by Arthur Topham

December 11, 2012

“I understand that you love freedom, but in our crowded world you have to pay a tax for freedom.

You cannot love freedom for yourselves alone and quietly agree to a situation where the majority

of humanity, spread over the greater part of the globe, is subjected to violence and oppression.

“The Communist ideology is to destroy your social order. This has been their aim for 125 years and

it has never changed; only the methods have changed a little….And what is ideological war? It is a

concentration of hatred, a continued repetition of the oath to destroy the Western world.”

~Aleksandr I. Solzhenitsyn, from a Speech given in New York City to the AFL-CIO on July 9, 1975

and contained in his book, Warning to the West.

Permit me to begin this essay by stating that in comparing the case of Arthur Topham and RadicalPress.com versus Regina (the ‘Crown’ aka B’nai Brith Canada) to that of the trials and sufferings of former Nobel Peace prize winner Aleksandr I. Solzhenitsyn, I am fully aware that it will naturally be construed by some readers as little more than hyperbole on the part of the writer. Nonetheless there are a number of historic lay lines connecting the two situations which need identification in the hope that others will see and understand the systematic progression and transformation of this climacteric element of tyranny that’s been stalking the global landscape since the successful Bolshevik coup of 1917 in Russia.

First I would like to add to Solzhenitsyn’s words where he states that Communism’s ideology aim has not changed from the start, only the “methods” have. This simple statement, for those of my generation and later generations, is indispensable when attempting to comprehend how the ideology itself has managed to retain its essential character even after the downfall in 1989 of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR).

Key to visualizing the doctrinal strands of the Communist ideology and their continual ability to unobtrusively weave themselves in and out of the ever-changing warp and woof of day to day history is the possession of a fundamental awareness that today’s political ideology, Zionism, is precisely the same ideology that first gave birth to its historic pedigree – Marxism in the mid-19th Century its founding and funding has, from day one, flowed from the same source.

Today, those who have been paying attention to the details in the Zionist script for the creation of a one world totalitarian dictatorship understand that there is a direct connection between the House of Rothschild, the political ideology known Zionism and the premeditated, deliberate, illegal creation of the state of Israel by the United Nations back in 1948. These ideas thrash about like a load of dirty underwear in an automatic washer on most alternative blogs dealing with political issues as well as in a myriad number of posts on Facebook and other internet forums and venues. So many viewers have peered through that revolving window that now (as compared to even a decade ago when the Internet was in its nascent beginnings) the Rothschild = Zionism = Israel connection is a done deal and recognized as fact. But what is not fully understood yet by this vast number of viewers is the underlying, direct relationship between Communism and Zionism, without which the world will continue to disconnect the two apparently differing ideologies and fail to grasp the crucial historic continuity of this longstanding conspiracy; one meant to destroy the West and bring to fruition the ultimate goal of the Communist creed – world slavery under an all powerful Rothschild oligarchy.

The genius that was Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn knew his enemy well enough that he was able, upon finally having his eleven year sentence in the Soviet gulag annulled in April of 1956, to actually have his first novel, One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich, published in Krushchev’s soviet union in 1962. His earlier works that included The First Circle and Cancer Ward were first published in English in 1968 and by 1970 had earned him the Nobel Prize for literature. It wasn’t until 1974 though that Solzhenitsyn was finally arrested again and expelled from the Soviet Union after a copy of his Gulag was seized by the KGB in December of 1973. He first moved to West Germany and then to Vermont in the USA where he remained until returning permanently to Russia in 1994.

Solzhenitsyn’s classic work The Gulag Archipelago was first published in English and French in June of 1974 and remains the literary lynchpin holding together the ultimate hidden knowledge regarding the cogent connection between Marxism, the supposed “Russian” Revolution, Communism, Bolshevism and Zionism and their direct tie to the Rothschild oligarchy alluded to earlier.

Solzhenitsyn was able to accomplish this monumental feat of delivering to the West the evidence merely by omission. His trilogy of terror (the Gulag), which outlines the subsequent premeditated, calculated mass genocide of approximately 66 million Russians, mostly of Christian denomination, from the coup of 1917 up until Krushchev was deposed in 1964, will stand forever as the single most important work ever written on the actualizing and unfolding of Zionism’s essential tenets in a real life situation where a vast nation fell under the full control and domination of its ideological proponents.

He was able to have it published and promoted in the West by simply omitting to identify the vast majority of all the key players in his epic drama of demonic destruction as being of Ashkenazi Jewish origins. In this way he avoided the West’s Zionist press that controls all the major publishing houses throughout Europe and North America who, had he pin-pointed the true ethnic identity of the rogues and criminals and sadistic, psychopathic killers who were directly responsible for this mass murder of the Russian people (including all of Tzar Nicholas II’s family and even the family dog!), would have outright shunned him and his work and in all likelihood initiated a smear campaign against him that would have included all the same tactics now being employed by the Zionist controlled media here in Canada to attack my own person and my website RadicalPress.com.

Upon his return to the Russian republic in the mid 1990′s Solzhenitsyn resumed work on another two volume set of books entitled Two Hundred Years Together, the history of the Jews in Russia. The first volume was called Russian Jewish History 1795-1916 and when published created such a stink within Zionist circles that when volume two, The Jews in the Soviet Union came out in Russia the West was then on to him and the book was never published in the English language and still remains censored by the Jewish media to this day, a prime example of the power of the Zionist media to cover up their endless crimes against humanity.

Fortunately the German Revisionist Udo Walendy was able to procure copies and translate the book into German and from there an English translation of segments of the overall work made it to the West and were published by the Barnes Review in their September-October 2008 edition of their magazine. While not a complete version of the text the edition in question covers the issue of the major players in the gulag drama and identifies all those who were of Jewish origin, more than sufficient to firmly establish that the ‘Russian Revolution’ was in truth little more than an incredible take-over of a nation by Zionist forces funded in full measure by the Rothschild banking cartel.

When Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn was travelling around the United States back in 1975 speaking to different groups about his experiences in the Soviet concentrations camps during the late 40′s and early 50′s he kept emphasizing the perennial problem of trying to convey to people the imminent danger that Communism (aka Zionism) posed to the Western democracies. During one such talk he asked, “Is it possible or impossible to transmit the experience of those who have suffered to those who have yet to suffer? Can one part of humanity learn from the bitter experience of another or can it not? Is it possible or impossible to warn someone of danger?” He then capped off his questings by firmly stating, “It can happen. It is possible. As a Russian proverb says: ‘When it happens to you, you’ll know it’s true.’

Speaking for myself as a writer and publisher here in Canada I too can say that when you attempt to expose the true identity of those who continually strive to remain hidden behind the outer show curtain of unfolding political events while at the same time are controlling the actions of politicians and the mainstream media and all levels of the legal system via their influential lobby groups and advisers and sayanim who have infiltrated every stratum of Canada’s cultural, social, legal, economic, governmental and corporate levels, then you will undoubtedly be attacked in their media and accused by their pressure groups such as B’nai Brith Canada of being an “anti-Semite” and a “hate monger” and “racist” and then, based upon said accusations, arrested by their complicit police agents working for the “Crown” (but another name for the representative of the City of London in England owned by the same Rothschild oligarchy that owns everything else of importance in the world today) and thrown into jail and your constitutional rights taken away from you before you even begin to approach a courtroom in order to challenge their illegal, immoral actions.

Such is the current state of affairs in Canada today whether those in denial of this fact and the complacent and lazy and otherwise too busy to notice portions of society are willing to admit this or not.

Solzhenitsyn once remarked that the very essence of Communism/Zionism was quite beyond the scope of human understanding and that for so many average, normal, moral, decent people living in the West it was just too much of a stretch of their imagination to picture the real and dreadful, vile and disgusting actions committed by these ideologically and spiritually crippled people who have plundered and pillaged and raped and destroyed untold millions of souls in their quest to gain total control of the world.

I could go on with quote after quote from Solzhenitsyn warning to those in the West of the subtle dangers that are working ceaselessly everywhere to drag down unsuspecting nations into the mire of atheistic perversions and immoral mental and spiritual torpor and confusion thus making them incapable of realizing that their rights and freedoms are being terminated until it is too late. Ultimately he says it becomes incumbent upon the individual to reject the Zionist ideology in favour of simply being a human being. In his words, “Such a rejection is more than a political act. It is a protest of our souls against those who would have us forget the concepts of good and evil.”

Thirty seven years have now passed since Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn travelled throughout the USA warning the nation of the impending dangers of Communism/Zionism and imploring the people to wake up and take heed of what he was telling them based upon his own first hand experience. Did the American people hear his words and did they understand? Did they do anything to forestall what was then the beginning of the shift from Communism to what we now call Zionism? Judging from all appearances Solzhenitsyn’s words fell on deaf ears or at least ears already stopped up by the din and blare of the Zionist media that had, for decades, already been pumping their minds full of Zionist propaganda.

Today that same danger has grown even more powerful and openly threatening. It was first openly declared by Douglas Reed back in 1956 in his monumental classic The Controversy of Zion and then enunciated with greater emphasis and detail in 1975 by gulag survivor Solzhenitsyn in his equally eloquent 3-volume trilogy The Gulag Archipelago and still the mass of citizenry continue to think and act as if this threat to their very existence doesn’t exist other than in the imaginations and fantasies of “conspiracy theorists” and Internet fringe dwellers.

And so this very question arises once again with respect to my own trials and tribulations. For years now I have been researching and publishing information that corroborates all that these great forerunners like Reed and Solzhenitsyn have revealed to the world about the supreme danger that lies hidden within the Zionist ideology. Five years ago my website came up on the Zionist’s radar screen and they decided to do whatever it would take to demonize me and have my website removed from the Internet. That is why they created the so-called “HATE CRIME” laws which were insinuated over time into Canada’s legal system via their lobbyist influence, their infiltration of the Supreme Court of Canada (four out of nine SCC Justices are now Zionist Jews) and their behind the scenes control of all of Canada’s active political parties and their leaders via non-elected ‘advisers’.

Will my warning to Canada and the rest of the world also go unheeded like those before me who had the foresight and courage to risk their very lives to bring to light this dark and menacing evil that is slowly overshadowing the lives of people around the globe as well as the very planet upon which we all must live? Will Canadians listen and begin to stand up and speak out without fear? Will they lend their support to my struggle to defeat this sec. 319(2) “Hate” law and protest over the manner in which I am being treated as a Canadian citizen? Or will they stand by in silence, apathy and paranoia watching while the Zionist forces within their nation force yet another writer and researcher to take down his website and cease from telling the truth about what is happening to his country?

It is not just Arthur Topham who will be on trial in the days ahead but every Canadian who values their right to freedom of speech.

——–

Filed Under: AFL-CIO, Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, Alternative Media, anti-Semitism, Arthur Topham, Ashkenazi Jews, B'nai Brith Canada, BC HATE CRIME TEAM, Bolsheviks, Charter of Rights & Freedoms, Cheka, City of London, Communism, Crown Council Jennifer Johnston, Cst Normandie Levas BC HATE CRIME TEAM, Czar Nicholas II, Det-Cst Terry Wilson BC HATE CRIME TEAM, Dr. Udo Walendy, Editor's Zone, Free Speech on the Internet, Freedom of Speech, Hate Crime laws, House of Rothschild, Internet Freedom, Jacob H. Schiff, Jewish Holocaust Lie, Jewish Lobby, Jewish Media Monopoly, Jewish power, Jewish Racism, Jewish Supremacism, Jews Behind Bolshevik Revolution, Joseph Stalin, Karl Marx, KGB, Lazar Kaganovich, League for Human Rights of B'nai Brith Canada, Lenin, Leon Trotsky (Bronstein), Marxism, NKVD, Pharisaic Judaism, Political Prisoners, Political Zionism, Premier Kerensky, RadicalPress.com, RCMP Corruption, Regina, Richard Warman, Rothschild Banking syndicate, Rothschild Zionist Criminal Cartel, Russia, Russian Revolution, sayanim, Sec. 319(2) CC "Willful Promotion of Hatred", The Controversy of Zion, The Gulag Archipelago, The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, The Radical, The Radical Press, Ukrainian Holocaust, United Nations, Zionism, Zionist Atrocities, Zionist Jews in Russia

Spingola/ZionCrimeFactory Interview: Discussions on ZFC’s New Book, Zionism & Arthur Topham

December 7, 2012 by admin Leave a Comment

Click HERE to listen to Interview

[Editor's Note: On behalf of RadicalPress.com I would like to take this opportunity to express my most sincere thanks to both Deanna Spingola and her Guest Zander C. Fuerza of ZionistCrimeFactory.com for adding my legal case with B'nai Brith Canada to their discussions on the Jewish Supremacist agenda for global destruction and world slavery.

Zander is an erudite speaker and dedicated researcher who is in the final stages of completing a book dealing with the very issues discussed in this interesting interview.

The fact that he has dedicated so much of the discussion to my battle with the Jewish lobbyists and their censorship plans for Canada is a genuine indication that the issue of Freedom of Speech on the Internet is one that spans borders and is as vital a concern to citizens of the USA as well as Canada.

Please pass this interview on to other concerned citizens everywhere.]

———-

Hello,

I interviewed Zander C. Fuerza (ZCF) today, December 6, 2012. You may hear this interview by visiting this web site:

http://www.spingola.com/SpingolaSpecials.html

Thanks for your interest in my programs.

Kindest Regards,

Deanna

My radio program: Monday-Friday, 11 am to 1 pm (CT)

www.republicbroadcasting.org

My radio schedule: http://www.spingola.com/radio_schedule.html

Spingola Specials - commercial-free interviews

My Books:

The Ruling Elite, a Study in Imperialism, Genocide and Emancipation

The Ruling Elite, the Zionist Seizure of World Power

(both available at Amazon, www.spingola.com and other retailers)

Filed Under: "hate speech", "Jewish" holocaust, 'Al Qaeda', 'state' of Israel, 9/11 Truth, Abe Foxman, Abrams/BBC v. Arthur Topham & RadicalPress.com, Adolf Hitler, Anti-Defamation League (ADL), anti-Semitism, Anti-ZionistCanada Yahoo Group, Arthur Topham, Auschwitz-Birkenau, B'nai Brith Canada, B'nai Brith International, Babylonian Talmud, BC HATE CRIME TEAM, Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Canadian Council for Israel and Jewish Advocacy (CIJA), Canadian Free Speech League, Canadian Jewish Congress, Canadian Jewish Defense League, Canadian Judicial System, CC Johnston, Charter of Rights & Freedoms, Cst Normandie Levas BC HATE CRIME TEAM, David Duke, Deir Yassin massacre, Det-Cst Terry Wilson BC HATE CRIME TEAM, Douglas H. Christie, Dr. Fredrick Toben, Editor's Zone, Ezra Levant, Freedom of Speech, Gas Chambers, Gaza, Gentiles, German POWs, Germany Must Perish!, Harold Wallace Rosenthal, Harry Abrams, Hate laws, Highway of Tears, Internet Freedom, Israel, Israeli Terrorism, Israeli War Crimes, Jewish Banking Cartel, Jewish Censorship, Jewish Crime, Jewish Hatred, Jewish Holocaust Industry, Jewish Holocaust Lie, Jewish lobbyists, Jewish Media Monopoly, Jewish Racism, Jewish Supremacism, Jewish Terrorists, Jim Townsend, Judge Morgan, League for Human Rights of B'nai Brith Canada, Mainstream Mindcontrol Media (M3), Missing Women Commission of Inquiry, Morgenthau Plan, Mossad, National(Zionist)Post, Pharisaic Judaism, Pharisees, Political Prisoners, Political Zionism, Prothink, Rabbi Stephen Wise, RadicalPress.com, RCMP Corruption, Richard Warman, Rothschild Zionist Criminal Cartel, Sec. 319(2) CC "Willful Promotion of Hatred", SunTV News Network, The Controversy of Zion, The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, The Source, Twin Towers/911, Ukrainian Holocaust, World Jewry, World Zionist Organization, Zion Crime Factory, Zionism, Zionist Atrocities

Israeli apostate Gilad Atzmon blamed for UK anti-Semitism

December 6, 2012 by admin Leave a Comment

[Editor Note: Gilad Atzmon is one of the more shining examples of the fact that the Zionist Jew cabal will do its damnedest to keep Truth suppressed regardless of who is speaking it. Being of Jewish parentage Gilad is therefore automatically labeled a "self-hating Jew" because of his honesty and sincerity in pointing out the vast discrepancies between what Zionism purports to be and what it really is.]

——

http://www.gilad.co.uk/writings/report-israeli-apostate-blamed-for-uk-anti-semitism.html

Introduction by Gilad Atzmon: The following Hasbara piece crowns my book and myself as the ultimate exponents of “a relatively new form of antisemitism injected into the anti-Zionist discourse”. The piece admits a Jewish political dedication to book burning and the author behind this piece is somehow desperate to silence me and my work. The Hasbara writer is also convinced that it is down to Jews to decide what Brits should read who should be featured in their media outlets.

Needless to say that any of my critics have yet to point at a single drop of antisemitism, racism or an incitement of any kind of hatred in my entire work. I am indeed an opponent of Jewish politics and highly critical of Jewish power. However, I am clearly delighted to learn that Hasbara as well as a few Shabbath Goyim are devastated by my work. It seems the Hasbara man didn’t find many followers in the BBC or in Manchester City Council. But he certainly regards Ali Abunimah as an ally.

——

Report: Israeli apostate blamed for UK anti-Semitism

http://defenseoftheisraelipeople.wordpress.com/2012/12/03/report-israeli-apostate-blamed-for-uk-anti-semitism/

An investigation into Judeophobia in Britain concludes that Jewish renegade and jazz saxophonist Gilad Atzmon is responsible for injecting a “relatively new form of antisemitism into anti-Zionist discourse” in the UK.

According to Antisemitic Discourse in Britain in 2011, published by the Community Security Trust, which monitors anti-Semitism in the UK, the apostate Israeli’s rancorous views are contributing to a climate of mistrust and hostility.

Thankfully, explicit anti-Semitism in British public life is rare, says the report. Nevertheless, anti-Semitic themes alleging Jewish conspiracy and power still exist within mainstream discourse about Israel and Zionism. This, claims the CST, is partly due to the nefarious writings of Atzmon, whose recent book The Wandering Who? A Study of Jewish Identity Politics is cited as an example of anti-Semitic discourse.

Atzmon, born in Tel Aviv and trained at the Rubin Academy of Music in Jerusalem, describes himself as a “proud self-hating Jew.” Now based in London, Atzmon has released over a dozen jazz albums.Atzmon is also a prolific opponent of Israel, Jews and Judaism. His conspiratorial articles have been published by a number of dubious media outlets, including Counterpunch, Al-Arab online, the Palestine Telegraph and Aljazeera.info.

The Wandering Who? was released in September 2011 by left-wing publisher Zero Books. It is packed with anti-Semitic rhetoric and is barely distinguishable from the worst Nazi propaganda (one of the chapter headings is “Swindler’s List”). The book is a litany of hatred and lies that blames Jewish bankers for two world wars and “one communist revolution.” Jews are also responsible, says Atzmon, for persuading the UK to attack Iraq in order to “erase one of the last pockets of Arab resistance to Zionism.” Jews, he asserts, have no origin in Palestine “whatsoever” and Israeli children who visit Auschwitz return home to “mimic SS barbarity.” And perhaps most shockingly, Atzmon states that one day people “may be bold enough” to argue that “Hitler was right after all.” This is just a small sample of the book’s outrageous claims.

A few months ago I tried to have all copies of The Wandering Who? removed from libraries in Manchester, which is home to Britain’s second-largest and fastest-growing Jewish community. But because the book “has not incurred penalties under the law,” the city council says “it should not be excluded from libraries on any moral, political, religious or racist ground alone to satisfy any sectional interest.” Apparently, Manchester city council believe that the book is a legitimate expression of “human experience and activity.” I will, of course, try again to have all copies removed from the city’s libraries on the grounds that such blatant anti-semitism does not serve the public interest and may actually incite hatred or violence against the Jewish community.

It troubles me a lot that Atzmon’s books are available in British public libraries (and elsewhere). His texts are useful fodder for far-right extremists, far-left radicals and Islamic fundamentalists. But I am cheered by the fact that many Palestinian activists and left-wingers have condemned Atzmon and want nothing to do with him. Indeed, Atzmon’s views are so repellent that even the Guardian newspaper has removed his book from its site(!)

Sabbath Goyim United:*

Following the publication of The Wandering Who? in 2011, ten anti-Zionist authors wrote to the publisher to complain that “the thrust of Atzmon’s work is to normalize and legitimize anti-Semitism.” Moreover, a number of Palestinian intellectuals wrote to Atzmon himself, saying: “We reaffirm that there is no room in this historic and foundational analysis of our struggle for any attacks on our Jewish allies, Jews, or Judaism; nor denying the Holocaust; nor allying in any way shape or form with any conspiracy theories, far-right, orientalist, and racist arguments, associations and entities.”

The Wandering Who? A Study Of Jewish Identity Politics and Sabbatha Goyim within the Left

Amazon.com or Amazon.co.uk

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Wandering-Who-Jewish-Identity-Politics/dp/1846948754/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1317809176&sr=8-1

Of course, it is possible that some in the Palestinian camp have no choice but to distance themselves from Atzmon because such blatant anti-Semitism hurts their cause. Indeed,** there have been “some factional splits” on the Left, with some people still defending him. This is to be expected, I suppose. The Left is always disintegrating and reforming behind some cultish personality. But I did not expect the BBC World Service to take Atzmon’s side.

A few weeks ago, Atzmon was invited by the World Service to take part in a discussion on music and politics. Julian Woricker, who presented the program, claimed to be familiar with Atzmon’s writings but did nothing to challenge Atzmon. In fact, Woricker seemed incredulous that anyone would think his guest was anti-Semitic! The fact that the broadcaster – a supposedly mainstream and impartial news organization, funded by the British taxpayer, – invited Atzmon into the heart of the BBC is a disgrace.

The reasons for Atzmon’s self-hatred are no doubt complex. Historian Bernard Lewis believes that Jewish self-hate is a neurotic reaction to gentile anti-Semitism, whereby the victim incorporates, articulates and amplifies the views of the dominant culture. Well, this is nothing new. The burning of the Talmud in the 13th century was at the behest of a Jewish apostate to Christianity. Karl Marx authored a work called A World Without Jews and asserted that usury was the “object of the Jew’s worship.” Among the most notable Jewish self-haters is American publisher and pornographer Samuel Roth (who died in 1974), whose 325-page anti-Semitic diatribe Jews Must Live: an Account of the Persecution of the World by Israel on All Frontiers of Civilization, published in 1930, was quoted at Nazi rallies and is held in high esteem by modern-day white supremacist groups.

According to Rabbi Yisroel Cohen (Chabad Lubavitch, Manchester), Jewish self-hatred is as old as the Jewish people. Of course, there are various spiritual and psychological explanations for the phenomenon, he explained. Plus, there are midrashic sources which say that “no nation can gain an upper hand over the Jewish nation without having support from within.”

This chimes with the view of Netta Kohn Dor-Shav, a US-born clinical psychologist now at Bar Ilan University in Israel, who warns: “It is fair to say that the plague of Jewish self-hatred is more dangerous for the survival of the Jewish people than any outside threat.” In a report for the Ariel Center for Policy Research, she concludes that such self-hatred “fuels a vicious cycle that can lead to disaster and dissolution of the Jewish people and the Jewish State.”

The CST points out that “expressions of anti-Semitism in public discourse remain a serious issue of concern as they exacerbate hostile attitudes towards Jews.” The CST is absolutely correct. But I would also add that “such expressions of anti-Semitism” legitimizes extreme violence against the State of Israel and Israel individuals. Anti-Semitic language easily translates into Hamas rockets or Islamic suicide-bombers. If I had the money, I’d bet a million pounds that Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has read The Wandering Who? and has absorbed the book’s claims into his own rhetoric against Israel. Today’s verbal bombast is tomorrow’s nuclear missile aimed at Tel Aviv.

Anyone who cares about ending anti-Semitism should urge the BBC and other broadcasters not to collaborate with Atzmon. Tell mainstream newspapers that it’s unacceptable to print Atzmon’s anti-Semitic articles. Write to publishers, libraries and booksellers, and encourage them not to publish or stock Atzmon’s hateful texts. Zionist or anti-Zionist, each of us has the ability to help push Atzmon’s obscene opinions into the gutter where they belong.

*Added by GA

** Or is it because they are funded by George Soros? (GA)

——

Filed Under: "Jewish" holocaust, 'state' of Israel, Anti-Defamation League (ADL), anti-Semitism, Ashkenazi Jews, B'nai Brith Canada, B'nai Brith International, Deir Yassin massacre, Det-Cst Terry Wilson BC HATE CRIME TEAM, Editor's Zone, England, Freedom of Speech, Gilad Atzmon, Israeli Terrorism, Israeli War Crimes, Jewish Banking Cartel, Jewish Censorship, Jewish Holocaust Industry, Jewish Holocaust Lie, Jewish Lobby Groups, Jewish Media Monopoly, Jewish Racism, Jewish Supremacism, League for Human Rights of B'nai Brith Canada, Palestine, Pharisaic Judaism, Political Prisoners, Political Zionism, RCMP Corruption, Rothschild Zionist Criminal Cartel, The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, Ukrainian Holocaust, Victor Orstrovsky, Zionist Atrocities

Mr. Bean champions Freedom of Speech in British video

December 3, 2012 by admin Leave a Comment

Rowan Atkinson: “The strongest weapon against hateful speech is not repression but more speech.”

Edward Abbey: “The best cure for the ills of democracy is more democracy.”

Click HERE to view video.

Filed Under: B'nai Brith Canada, B'nai Brith International, BC HATE CRIME TEAM, Charter of Rights & Freedoms, Cst Normandie Levas BC HATE CRIME TEAM, Det-Cst Terry Wilson BC HATE CRIME TEAM, Free Speech, Freedom of Expression, Freedom of Speech, Freedom of Thought, Jewish lobbyists, Mr. Bean - Rowan Atkinson, Political Zionism, RCMP Corruption, Sec. 319(2) CCC, The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, The Radical Press, Ukrainian Holocaust

Zionist Terror Tactics – a political cartoon from RadicalPress.com

December 2, 2012 by admin Leave a Comment

Filed Under: "hate speech", Abe Foxman, Abrams/B'nai Brith Canada v. Arthur Topham and RadicalP, Anti-Defamation League (ADL), anti-Semitism, Anti-Zionist Canada, Ashkenazi Jews, B'nai Brith Canada, B.C. Politics, B.C. Supreme Court, Babylonian Talmud, BC HATE CRIME TEAM, Bosheviks, Canadian Charter of Rights & Freedoms, Canadian Identity/Sovereignty, Canadian Jewish Congress, Canadian Jewish Defense League, Canadian Judicial System, Canadian traitors, Cheka, Christian Zionists, Crown Council Jennifer Johnston, Cst Normandie Levas BC HATE CRIME TEAM, Det-Cst Terry Wilson BC HATE CRIME TEAM, Ezra Levant, Freedom of Expression, Freedom of Speech, Freedom of Thought, Gaza, George Orwell, Harry Abrams, Hate Crime laws, Honourable Justice Morgan, Irwin Cotler, Israel, Jewish Banking Cartel, Jewish Censorship, Jewish Crime, Jewish Defense League (JDL), Jewish Hatred, Jewish Lobby Groups, Jewish Media Monopoly, Jewish Racism, Jewish Supremacism, Jewish Talmudists, Jewish Terrorists, Jews, Josef Stalin, Judeo-Christianity, Karl Marx, KGB, Kol Nidre prayer, Lonnie Landrud, Netfirms.com, Pharisaic Judaism, Pharisees, Political Prisoners, Political Zionism, Quesnel RCMP, RCMP Corruption, Richard Warman, Robert Pickton, Rothschild Banking syndicate, Rothschild Zionist Criminal Cartel, Sec. 319(2) CC "Willful Promotion of Hatred", terrorist Stern Gang, The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, THE ZUNDEL TRIAL & FREE SPEECH, Ukrainian Holocaust, World Jewry, World Zionist Organization, Zach P, Zionist Atrocities, Zionist Jews in Russia

RadicalPress.com Legal Update #5

November 30, 2012 by admin 1 Comment

Dear Free Speech Supporters,

On Tuesday, November 27, 2012 my wife and I once again wended our way into Quesnel to attend what I thought was to be a meeting with a Justice of the Peace who was going to speak with my lawyer Douglas Christie via telephone at 1:30 pm and arrange dates for an arraignment and a preliminary hearing regarding the sec. 319(2) criminal charge of “Willful promotion of hatred against an identifiable group, people of the Jewish religion or ethnic origin” brought against me by B’nai Brith Canada via their agents Harry Abrams and Richard Warman. That was what the JP stated during the previous meeting held on November 20, 2012.

Just prior to 1:30 pm the Justice came and told us that the meeting would be held in Judge’s Court instead at the same time.

When I was called up before the Honourable Judge Morgan the court clerk called Mr. Christie on the phone and upon answering Judge Morgan began to discuss the dates for the two issue and it was agreed upon that the arraignment would take place on April 2, 2013 at 1:30 pm and that preliminary inquiry would be set for the week of June 3 – 6, 2013.

Initially my lawyer had requested five days for the preliminary inquiry but for some reason unbeknownst to anyone present it was set for only four. Mr. Christie stated that he didn’t feel four days might be enough and given the fact that he was still awaiting disclosure from Crown Council Johnston of the relevant documents supporting the Crown’s reasons for the charge after a delay of over six months he felt that it was unreasonable to expect him to be able to ascertain the amount of time that might be required. That said the Judge still left it at four days.

Then the issue of the application to address bail conditions came up again. Crown council Jennifer Johnston told the Judge in no uncertain terms that the Crown was going to be pressing to have all of the original bail conditions reinstated when the bail hearing took place citing the “fact” that Det. Wilson had informed her that I was still posting articles on my website that Wilson deemed to be of the same calibre as those complained of by the A&W crew of Abrams and Warman.

The previous undertaking given to a judge which I am presently bound by came into effect on October 13, 2012 and did not include the following two conditions which were originally given to me by Det-Cst Terry Wilson back on May 16, 2012 when I was released from the Quesnel jail. At the time of my release I did not sign the document but that didn’t matter to the Crown who insist that it still is in effect.

These two conditions (and possibly more planned) are:

1. “You shall not post any information on any internet website that can be read by members of the general public.”

2. “You shall not operate, post to or manage or allow anyone to operate, post to or manage any internet site owned by you that can be accessed by the general public.”

It must of course be recognized that both of these Orwellian ultimatums fly in the face of my Charter of Rights and Freedoms as guaranteed by Canada’s so-called “Constitution.” This fact also appears not to have entered into the mind of Crown Council Jennifer Johnston.

Mr. Christie response to all this was that he finds it extremely difficult for him to argue against the Crown’s position when he is still waiting for the disclosure of the documents that would indicate the reasons why the Crown was taking such a hard line approach in defiance of my constitutional rights.

This of course brought up the subject of said disclosure materials which Crown Council had assured both Judge Morgan and Counsel Christie that she would be supplying Mr. Christie with when we last attended court on the 20th of November. That information, apparently on cd discs, never arrived at Mr. Christie’s office prior to November 27th.

Judge Morgan asked the Crown what the problem was stating that he thought the Crown had had sufficient time to get this matter together.

Crown Council Johnston then gave the Judge a swan song about how she really really wanted to get it done but that she was just soooo busy and then launched into all the things that she had on her plate that prevented her from accomplishing what she had said she would do last time we met in court. She then added that the material on the cd’s had to be “vetted” prior to sending them to Mr. Christie and that there were soooo many pages that had to be gone over and examined and it was soooo important that the accused not be privy to these documents before they were vetted and soooo on and soooo forth.

When it came time for setting a date for the next bail application to be heard there was no agreement between either Crown Council or Mr. Christie as to when they would be able to meet and so Judge Morgan decided that he would set a date and that both parties would have to make sure they were in attendance. At this point Judge Morgan also told Mr. Christie that this would likely be the last time he would be permitted to attend via telephone and that after that he would need to appear in person. The date was then set for Thursday, December 13, 2012 at 1:30 pm and the allotted time for Mr. Christie to argue against the Crown’s proposed conditions would be 45 minutes.

That said Mr. Christie then asked the Judge if he would ensure that the Crown furnish him with all the documentation required so that he would have time to prepare his arguments and Crown Council immediately said that she would get the information to Mr. Christie well in advance of the 13th of December. Judge Morgan then stated that Crown would have to furnish Mr. Christie with the information by no later than December 11, 2012. Hardly sufficient time in which to prepare a proper argument especially in light of the fact that Crown most likely was going to argue that all of my posts on RadicalPress.com since November 2nd, 2012 were indicative of more “hatred” being published against the ‘victims’ of this alleged “hate” crime.

That ended the session.

Some final comments:

It has been over six months now since Det-Cst Terry Wilson and his “BC HATE CRIME TEAM” swooped down upon my wife and I while we were travelling up to Prince George, B.C. in order to arrest me on this bogus charge, outraging me and traumatizing my dear wife. All the drama and hoopla surrounding Hate Hunter Wilson’s premeditated assault upon my constitutional right to freedom of speech on the Internet was simply that – a staged performance designed to lend some form of legitimacy and authenticity to what was simply an attack by the state upon an otherwise law-abiding citizen; one who has been openly informing the public about the very foreign agents who were responsible for making the complaint to the RCMP that precipitated this subsequent ambush on my legal and human right to freedom of speech and freedom of expression.

Yet, for all the hullabaloo and the gravity of this said “hate crime” – one based solely upon the contents of my website RadicalPress.com – the Crown still refuses to supply my defence lawyer Douglas Christie with the required disclosure documents that they apparently used to determine that such a charge was justified.

Instead, they used this bogus allegation to justify obtaining an illegal search warrant which was then used to invade my home and steal all of my computers and electronic files. And, in addition to that, they also stole my firearms (my only means of personal safety in the rural area where I live) and then had the audacity to add a further bogus charge of “unlawful storage of firearms” to the initial false charge. All this was of course done in order to furnish their controlled media with yet another juicy bit of misinformation that could then be used to smear and slander my person and give the impression that I was not only a vile hate-mongerer but also armed and dangerous!

The whole gist of this massive scam is to cover up the fact that the Jewish lobbies here in Canada have the judiciary and the RCMP and the media by the balls and whenever they wish to silence someone who is revealing this fact to the people of Canada all they have to do is put the squeeze on RCMP Hate Hunters like Det-Cst Wilson and Levas and the legal system suddenly kicks in to carry out the bidding of their task masters the Zionist lobby acting at the behest of its controlling arm B’nai Brith International. The perps in this charade then sit back and let the taxpayers of Canada pay all the expenses while I, a senior citizen on a very limited, fixed income, am forced to defend myself against this specious, anti-Charter of Rights charge.

Must be nice to have that sort of influence upon a nation that purports to be “free and democratic.”

One final note regarding my website.

Readers were informed that my website host Netfirms.com has issued a decree at the behest of a complaint from Hate Hunter Wilson that my website would be “terminated” in 48 hours unless I removed all the supposed “hate” content alleged by Wilson to be on the site.

Upon receiving said notification I replied to the Corporate representative for Netfirms.com, a person going by the name of “Zach P”, requesting further information as to what exactly I was expected to remove in order to meet Netfirms.com policy rules. I also requested of my readership that they write to Zach P and let him know that they did not agree with Hate Hunter Wilson’s assessment of my website and that Netfirms.com ought to leave it alone. All of these efforts of course proved to be futile. Zach P never had the decency to even respond to anyone, a clear indication that he and his company Netfirms.com could give a shit about what Canadians think and feel about the issue of freedom of speech on the Internet.

Realizing that I had but 48 hours to save my site I had it moved to a different server and now it is still alive and functioning but for how long is anyone’s guess.

The fact that Hate Hunter Wilson has been sleuthing about behind the scenes doing his damnedest to destroy my website speaks volumes in terms of the underhanded tactics that these supposed ” ‘Royal Canadian’ peace officers” will resort to in order to due the bidding of their foreign controllers. My lawyer tells me that even though Hate Hunter Wilson’s tactics are unethical and immoral and deplorable they still are not illegal and so there’s nothing that I can do about it. I’ll leave readers to judge whether or not H.H. Wilson’s actions ought to be allowed.

And so it goes as the wheels of justice here in Canuckistan slowly grind away and erode my rights and freedoms along with yours.

Again I would ask of readers that they assist me financially in my battle with the censors by sending donations to the cause. Due to the fact that the Crown is refusing to give the required disclosure to my lawyer I am not able to furnish legal aid with the required documents that they demand before looking at whether or not I might qualify for legal financial assistance. This leaves me in the unenviable position of having to rely solely upon donations to pay for my legal expenses and while I have been receiving some assistance from a few kind souls who realize the importance of this case to all Canadians the amount of money thus sent comes nowhere near that necessary to pay for my lawyer to appear in court in Quesnel to defend me against these false charges.

As such I would once again implore readers to give serious consideration to helping me out by either sending a donation via PayPal using either a PayPal account or a credit card or else sending a cheque or Money Order to me via snail mail at the following postal address. Cash of course also works.

Arthur Topham
4633 Barkerville Highway
Quesnel, B.C.
Canada
V2J 6T8

To access my PayPal button please go to my blog http://www.quesnelcariboosentinel.com The button is up on the right hand corner of the Home Page.

Thanks for all the support from those good folks who had the courage of their convictions to write a letter to Netfirms.com on my behalf. While these excellent letters may have had no effect upon the corporate heads at Netfirms.com they certainly provide a strong and positive endorsement for both myself and RadicalPress.com and for that reason alone they are gratefully received and acknowledged.

For Peace and Love and Truth and Justice for All,

I remain,

Sincerely,

Arthur Topham
Pub/Ed
RadicalPress.com
“Digging to the root of the issues since 1998″

Filed Under: "hate speech", Abrams/BBC v. Arthur Topham & RadicalPress.com, Alternative Media, anti-Semitism, Anti-Zionist Canada, Arthur Topham, B'nai Brith Canada, B'nai Brith International, B.C. Supreme Court, Babylonian Talmud, BC HATE CRIME TEAM, Canadian Association for Free Expression (CAFE), Canadian Charter of Rights & Freedoms, Canadian Council for Israel and Jewish Advocacy (CIJA), Canadian Free Speech League, Canadian Human Rights Act, Canadian Human Rights Commission, Canadian Human Rights Tribunal, Canadian Identity/Sovereignty, Canadian Jewish Congress, Canadian Jewish Defense League, Canadian Rights and Freedom Bulletin, Charter of Rights & Freedoms, Christian Zionists, Christians, Crown Council Jennifer Johnston, Cst Normandie Levas BC HATE CRIME TEAM, Det-Cst Terry Wilson BC HATE CRIME TEAM, Donation Appeal, Douglas H. Christie, Editor's Zone, FREE JIM TOWNSEND, Free Speech, Freedom of Expression, Freedom of Speech, Freedom of Thought, Harry Abrams, Hate Crime laws, Hate Hunter Wilson, Highway of Tears, Honourable Justice Morgan, Internet Freedom, Israeli Terrorism, Israeli War Crimes, Jesus Christ, Jewish Defense League (JDL), Jewish Lobby Groups, Lonnie Landrud, Marc Lemire, Palestine, Peace, Pharisaic Judaism, Picton Pig Farm, Political Prisoners, Political Zionism, Quesnel BC, Quesnel Cariboo Observer, Quesnel Court House, Quesnel RCMP, Radical Press, RCMP Corruption, Richard Warman, Rothschild Zionist Criminal Cartel, Sec. 319(2) CC "Willful Promotion of Hatred", Section 13/CHR Act, The Controversy of Zion, The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, Ukrainian Holocaust, World Zionist Organization, Zionist Atrocities

Statement of Roy Arthur Topham regarding his Arrest on May 16th, 2012 on the charge of “Willful promotion of hatred CC 319(2)”

How Many Jews? by Douglas Reed

The Real Terror is the Law by John Kaminski

The Trial of Guenter Deckert by Sylvia Stolz (English translation by Christine B. Miller)

Paul Fromm on the Demise of Free Speech in Canada by Prof. Kevin MacDonald

Honoring Doug Christie by James Holbeyfield, Counter-Currents Publishing

Brave Anti-Zionist & Defender of Human Rights, Doug Christie, Passes at 66

CANADIAN OUTLAWS: Truth, Christians and Free Speech fall prey to Zionist misfeasance by Arthur Topham

Radical Press Interview with Mark Glenn on The Ugly Truth BlogRadio Show

Jewry’s Plan For Universal Background Checks on U.S. Gun Owners by Brother Nathanael Kapner

Simon Wiesenthal Center’s 2012 Top Ten Anti-Semitic/Anti-Israel Slurs by Simon Says….

Richard Warman’s ‘Maximum Disruption’ Attacks upon Freedom of Speech in Canada from Marc Lemire at freedomsite.org

The Men Who Taste Jews in Their Sandwiches by Jim Goad

Watch Human Rights Watch – A Tribute to Prof Richard Falk By Gilad Atzmon

Radical Press Legal Update #7

B’nai Brith, ADL, Child Porn, Regina and Arthur Topham by Arthur Topham

TEN STEPS TO SUBVERSION by Eva Lyman

Radical Press Legal Update #6

When Jews Rule the World by Brother Nathanael of RealJewNews

Two Gulags: A second warning to the West by Arthur Topham

Spingola/ZionCrimeFactory Interview: Discussions on ZFC’s New Book, Zionism & Arthur Topham

Israeli apostate Gilad Atzmon blamed for UK anti-Semitism

Mr. Bean champions Freedom of Speech in British video

Zionist Terror Tactics – a political cartoon from RadicalPress.com

RadicalPress.com Legal Update #5

Donate via PayPal

Below Deck

Click to join Anti-Zionist Canada group

Pages

Recent Posts

Blogroll

Archives

Meta