In The Land of the Assassins by Betty Krawczyk


In The Land of the Assassins
Betty Krawczyk


Assassinations are always political. I was raised in Louisiana. Huey P. Long, who had served as governor of Louisiana and then was elected senator of the state was assassinated in 1935 .I was seven years old. Traumatized by this event, I became extremely nervous. My mother started dosing me with an oral product called Liberty Tonic that my father sold from his car along with other items. No telling what was in this concoction, but the taste was so ghastly I tried hard not to have the nightmares that were plaguing me. These nightmares were accompanied by involuntary cries and whimpering that would bring my mother and another dose of the dreaded tonic. I would insist that I was fine, but my mother knew I wasn’t. So did I. How could anybody be fine when the Armageddon was at hand? I knew this because of the way all of the adults in my world were acting following Huey P. Long’s assassination. Especially my father.

The country was trying to come out of the Great Depression. We were cash poor but never hungry as we grew and raised most of what we ate. The money my father made from his business helped. Others weren’t so lucky. The rich oil wells and refining capacities of the state were owned by Standard Oil. Little of the oil money slipped outside of the coffers of the company owners and corrupt government officials. Until Huey P. Long became governor in 1928. Then things started perking up. Long taxed the big oil money and started building new roads. He instituted new health care programs and best of all, new schools for both black and white kids. Everybody I knew loved Huey P. Long. He was a man of the people, for all the people. I thought he must be like Jesus. When Long was assassinated my father withdrew. I had never seen him cry before. To me, that signified the end of the world. Later I realized that assassinations kill more than the duly elected politician. They can also kill the hopes and dreams of ordinary people and plunge the nation (state, province) into despair. In recent times the American people have become so used to political assassinations’ we hardly notice anymore, or remember …Malcom X, President Kennedy, Robert Kennedy, Martian Luther King, and the ongoing almost daily assassinations of African Americans by US police. Obama’s drone program and kill lists are the perfect assassination tools for modern times.

The shrill US demands for Trump’s blood are growing louder. Trump is the opposite of my hero, Huey P. Long in most ways, but he will be the duly elected president. If the combined interests of the White House, CIA, FBI, Homeland Security and the banking cabals can’t get Trump through the media, I worry they are planning to bring him down in other ways. The three options they have are (a) to figure out a way to impeach Trump as soon as he takes office, (b) start a war with Russia that Trump would have to continue, (c) or kill him. Any of these three options will bring confusion, chaos and endless bloodshed, at home and abroad. I pray to the Great Mother of us all that I am wrong in worrying about this so much.



Remembering Obama’s “Shock and Awe” bombing of Libya 5 years ago today and how the “Antiwar” Movement blew it.   By Philip C. Restino, Jr.


Remembering Obama’s “Shock and Awe” bombing of Libya 5 years ago today and how the “Antiwar” Movement blew it.

By Philip C. Restino, Jr.
Central Florida Veterans For Peace
March 19, 2016

March 19th marked the 5th anniversary of the first African-American President unilaterally, and without provocation, ordering the U.S. “Shock and Awe” bombing the crap out of his African brothers and sisters in the sovereign North African nation of Libya. Not only that, he did so without even bothering to go to Congress and at least lie to them like his predecessor President George W. Bush did with his own “Shock and Awe” bombing of Iraq 8 years earlier. Just a few days after the bombing of Libya I spoke about it with Joyce Riley, host of the popular nationally syndicated radio show The Power Hour. See

The horrific destruction and loss of life and order in Libya over the 5 years since Obama’s “Shock and Awe”, along with the exporting of its growing destabilizing violence to Syria and Iraq, is pretty clear. However, we also need to recognize … and more importantly, learn the lesson from … how the “antiwar” organizations’ refusal to call for President’s Obama’s impeachment following his blatantly illegal March 19, 2011 bombing of Libya has allowed for Obama to do the same with Syria and Iraq again with even less resistance and with total impunity to the point of risking World War III.

Former U.S. Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney publicly endorsed our Central Florida chapter of Veterans For Peace’s resolution calling for the impeachment of President Obama for war crimes on that very day (March 19, 2011) in a prompt and direct response to my email to her asking for her public endorsement. Dr. McKinney was actually in Libya at the time with a delegation witnessing the U.S./NATO bombing of Libya, as was later documented in the 2012 book The Illegal War on Libya which Cynthia McKinney edited. See

Screen Shot 2016-03-20 at 9.22.23 AM

International Law Professor Francis Boyle had already endorsed our Impeach Obama for War Crimes resolution in 2010. Later that summer it was voted down for the 2nd year in a row at the Veterans For Peace national convention … however with much more support for it than when it was first presented by us at the 2009 VFP national convention. Following the “Shock and Awe” bombing of March 19, 2011, Professor Boyle was quick to initiate a campaign calling for the impeachment of President Obama over his illegal and unprovoked attack on Libya and made an excellent case for it on the Jack Blood Show a week or so afterwards, on March 30, 2011. See

Larry Pinkney, a former Black Panther and 10-year political prisoner, ran the article “Is it time to impeach Obama?” in his “Keeping it Real with Larry Pinkney” column in the Black Commentator on July 21, 2011 calling for President Obama’s impeachment for the same war crimes, and then some, cited in Veterans For Peace’s and other “antiwar” organizations’ prior calls for impeaching President Bush. See

It should be noted that Larry Pinkney also promptly and very publicly endorsed our Central Florida chapter of Veterans For Peace resolution calling for the impeachment of President Obama for war crimes; and it was just weeks later that the rank and file membership of Veterans For Peace passed the resolution at its national convention on the 3rd year in a row that it had been up for a vote. However, the national leadership of Veterans For Peace refused to send the same official letter to the members of Congress calling for impeachment proceedings of the Democrat President Barack Obama, let alone alert the media and make a public call for it, as they had so strongly done for their earlier resolution to impeach Republican President George W. Bush. See the timeline here:

Screen Shot 2016-03-20 at 9.20.09 AM

I’m firmly convinced that the “antiwar” organizations totally blew a fantastic opportunity to actually have slowed, if not stopped, the 9/11 Wars with their refusal to apply to the Democrat War Criminal President Obama the same standard they had set with their prior case for impeaching the Republican War Criminal President George W. Bush followed by a strong public call for it. Of course in our 2-party political structure, the so-called “left” calling for the impeachment of a Republican President would not likely lead to an actual removal of the Republican President from office unless members of Congress from the same party would significantly join in the call for his impeachment. Not surprisingly, that turned out to be the case in the antiwar left’s strong and just public call for impeaching Republican President George W. Bush.

Again, the so-called “antiwar” organizations after having spent years making the clear and compelling case for impeachment of the Republican President George W. Bush for his illegal invasions and wars of aggression (the 9/11 Wars) now had the opportunity of a lifetime to finally rein in the position of the U.S. President’s ability to wage such illegal wars with impunity simply by applying the same standard of the same public call for impeachment to the Democrat President Obama for his own command over and continuation of those same illegal wars … not to mention his initiating even more of his own illegal wars, invasions and related war crimes. See “Impeach Now or Forever Hold Up Peace” from June 27, 2011. Instead, the national leadership of Veterans For Peace, along with other organizations from the “antiwar” left, not only chose not to call for Obama’s impeachment but actively suppressed such calls from its rank and file. See

Screen Shot 2016-03-20 at 9.40.16 AM

If the so-called “antiwar” left had called for impeaching the Democrat War Criminal President Obama for the same crimes cited in its prior call for impeaching the Republican War Criminal President Bush, there would be nowhere to pass the political football, the partisanship would be out the window, the people’s remedy of impeachment would have teeth again and the office of the President of the United States would actually have to face accountability for its illegal actions. As a result of the “left cover” provided the Democrat War Criminal President Obama over the past 7+ years, the ability of anyone … Democrat, Republican or whatever … occupying the office of President of the United States to bomb and kill whomever, wherever, and whenever he wants with total impunity has been firmly established in practice.

I can’t help but think of all the Gold Star Mothers, and mothers “over there”, who have been added to the ranks since our Central Florida chapter of Veterans For Peace’s first call for impeachment of the Democrat War Criminal Obama following the publication of former CFVFP member Tom Santoni’s “IMPEACH OBAMA!” article written February 2, 2009 in response to President Obama’s unilateral, illegal … and without provocation … deadly drone-bombing of unsuspecting targets in Pakistan. I can’t help but wonder if the “antiwar” movement had put adherence to principle above loyalty to political party and ideology and joined our legitimate call for impeaching President Obama at that time, would the widespread practice … and to a troubling extent, acceptance … of drone bombing anyone, anywhere and at anytime simply because the President of the United States or one of his underlings says so be what it is today. See

Screen Shot 2016-03-20 at 9.36.31 AM

The harm done by the stubborn partisanship of the “antiwar” left … both in the death and destruction abroad and in the neutralizing of the “power of the people” here at home, in particular the people’s constitutional remedy of impeachment … needs to be acknowledged and widely discussed.


Phil Restino is a peacetime veteran, having served in the U.S. Army Infantry from 1983 to 1985. He was a founding member of the Central Florida chapter of Veterans For Peace (Col. Bob Bowman Memorial Chapter) in August 2005 and has served as one of its chapter co-chairs ever since. For more information, please visit

For those who might be interested and could spare the time to listen to on-air discussions I’ve had with radio hosts detailing as an “insider” of sorts of the so-called “antiwar” organizations as to what I know happened and how it happened and what could have been, please take a listen to the following clips.

Re-Invading Iraq and the Failure of Antiwar Orgs (6:55 min)

VFP Calls to Impeach Obama for his War Crimes (8:42 min)

Calls to Antiwar Leaders: Impeach Now or Forever Hold Up Peace (2:08 min)

10-yr VFP Chapter Leader discusses Antiwar Orgs’ suppression of 9/11 Truth (53:59 min)


Brainwashing: 911 & the Holohoax by Alfred Schaefer (Video)

9/11 Brainwashing part 1
9/11 Brainwashing part 2
Editor’s Note: Brainwashing: 9/11 & the Holohoax – a two part video by German producer Alfred Schaefer – is, without a doubt, one of the best visual productions to date outlining the massive deceptions on the part of the Zionist Jew criminal cartel now in control of the majority of Western civilization. Via its powerful media control, its control of western political leaders, and the power of its purse to wreak havoc across the globe using whatever ruthless tactics it so desires in order to create chaos, confusion and fear in the minds and hearts of the common people, these two videos give the viewer a comprehensive overview of just how the masses have been brainwashed over the past seventy years.
Schaefer’s 2-part video is amazingly well done and packed full with extensive footage relating to 9/11 and to the evidence surrounding the Holohoax that was revealed to the world during the famous Ernst Zundel trial in Canada throughout the 1980’s and ’90’s.
Brainwashing: 9/11 & the Holohoax reveals the endless deceptions, the blatant lies of the Zionist Jew media and those who labour to maintain the deception surrounding both these two world-changing events – the false claims of 6 Million Jews purported to have been gassed and “holocausted” in ovens during WW2 and the subsequent attack upon the World Trade Centre on September 11, 2001.
Using footage related to the 9/11 false flag where those complicit attempt to divert attention from the skeptical public’s questioning by equating them with “Holocaust deniers” Schaefer is then able to show viewers the striking similarities between these two Zionist false flags and clearly outline why 1+1=2 and not 3.
These videos illuminate with increasing intensity the dark shroud of lies that the Zionist criminal cartel continually uses to cover up their own diabolic actions and one cannot watch them without coming away feeling that all which Schaefer has presented as further evidence of these two massive cover-ups makes perfect sense in light events that have transpired since 1945.
Viewers are urged to pass these videos on to friends and those who are still in doubt about both these cataclysmic events that are driving the world further and further to the brink of global disaster.

Did Putin Just Bring Peace to Ukraine? by Mike Whitney, Counterpunch

Screen Shot 2014-09-06 at 9.44.15 PM



Obama Begs for More War

Did Putin Just Bring Peace to Ukraine?



“In the implementing of their policies, our western partners– the United States first and foremost – prefer to be guided not by international law, but by force. They believe in their own ‘exceptionalism’, that they are allowed to decide on the fate of the world, and that they are always right.”

– Russian President Vladimir Putin

Vladimir Putin 400

“What did we do to deserve this? What did we do to deserve being bombed from planes, shot at from tanks, and have phosphorous bombs dropped on us? ….That we wanted to live the way we want, and speak our own language, and make friends with whom we want?”

– Alexander V. Zakharchenko, Chairman of The Council of Ministers of The Donetsk National Republic, The Vineyard of the Saker

There is no way to overstate the significance of what has transpired in Ukraine in the last three weeks. What began as a murderous onslaught on the mainly Russian-speaking population of east Ukraine, has turned into a major triumph against a belligerent and expansionistic empire that has been repulsed by a scrappy, battle-hardened militia engaged in a conventional, land-based war.  The conflict in east Ukraine is Obama’s war; launched by Obama’s junta government, executed by Obama’s proxy army, and directed by Obama’s advisors in Kiev. The driving force behind the war is Washington’s ambitious pivot to Asia, a strategy that pits Russia against Europe to prevent further economic integration and to establish NATO forward-operating bases on Russia’s western border. Despite the overheated rhetoric, the talk of a (NATO) “Rapid Reaction Force”, and additional economic sanctions; the US plan to draw Ukraine into the western sphere of influence and weaken Russia in the process, is in tatters. And the reason it is in tatters is because a highly-motivated and adaptable militia has trounced Obama’s troopers at every turn pushing the Ukrainian army to the brink of collapse. Check out this frontline update from The Saker:

“The (Ukrainian Army) is not retreating on one, two or even three directions, it is retreating everywhere (except north of Lugansk).  Entire battalions are leaving the front under orders of their battalion commanders and without the approval of the Junta leaders.  At least one such battalion commander is already being judged for desertion.  The entire Ukie leadership seems to be in a panic mode, especially Iatseniuk and Kolomoiski, while the Nazis are mad as hell at the Poroshenko administration.  There are constant rumors of an anti-Poroshenko coup by outraged Nazi nationalists…..

The bottom line is this: Poroshenko promised a victory in a matter of weeks and his forces suffered one of the most total defeats in the history of warfare. ….the most likely thing is that this ridiculous “Banderastan” experiment has seriously begun sinking now and that many rats are leaving the ship.

The War in Ukraine“, Vineyard of the Saker

The fact that the demoralized Ukrainian army has been defeated by the superior fighting force is of little importance in the big scheme of things, however, the fact that Washington’s global resource war– which began on 9-11 and has reduced numerous sovereign countries into anarchic, failed states– has been stopped in its tracks, is significant. The so called War on Terror–which was recently rebranded under the ISIS moniker–has wreaked holy havoc and death on Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, and now Syria. By routing the Ukrainian army the Novorussian Armed Forces (NAF)  has put the kibosh on Obama’s Great Game strategy  in Eurasia and torpedoed Washington’s plan to rule the world by force of arms. It could be that the battles of Lugansk and Donetsk are eventually regarded as the turning point, where the lumbering and over-extended empire finally met its match and began its precipitous decline. In any event, there’s no doubt that Friday’s ceasefire agreement is a serious blow to US hegemony.


“The defining factor in relations with NATO remains the unacceptability for Russia of plans to move the military infrastructure of the alliance towards our borders, including via enlargement of the bloc,”  said Mikhail Popov, deputy head of Putin’s Security Council.

The issue has always been NATO expansion, not the ridiculous claim that Putin wants to rebuild the Russian Empire. The only one interested in in stitching together a global Caliphate is Barack Hussein Obama and his nutcase neocon advisors. Putin is not interested in an empire. Putin just wants to make money like everyone else. He wants to sell gas to Europe, raise living standards and rebuild the country.  What’s wrong with that?

Putin’s not a troublemaker. He’s not sticking a freaking first-strike nuclear missile system in Havana just 60 miles from Miami. But that’s what Obama wants to do. Obama want to establish NATO bases on Russia’s doorstep and deploy his fake-named “missile defense system” a couple hundred miles from Moscow. Putin can’t allow that. No one in their right mind would allow that. It’s a direct threat to national security. Here’s how Putin summed it up in a recent press conference:

“Russia is an independent and active participant of international relations. Just like any nation it has national interests that must be taken into consideration and respected…..We stand against having a military organization meddling in our backyard, next to our homeland or in the territories that are historically ours. I just cannot imagine visiting NATO sailors in Sevastopol,” he stressed. “Most of them are fine lads, but I’d rather they visit us in Sevastopol than the other way around.” (Vladimir Putin)

Washington’s harebrained gambit was doomed from the get go. Who made the decision to topple Yanuchovych,  install a US-puppet in Kiev, fill-out the security services with neo Nazis, and wage a bloody ethnic cleansing purge on the Russian-speaking people in the east?  Who was it?  Isn’t there any accountability among the Obama team or is it all a matter of “failing upwards” like the Bush crowd? Here’s Putin again:

“Our western partners created the ‘Kosovo precedent’ with their own hands. In a situation absolutely the same as the one in Crimea they recognized Kosovo’s secession from Serbia legitimate while arguing that no permission from a country’s central authority for a unilateral declaration of independence is necessary….And the  agreed with those arguments. That’s what they said; that’s what they trumpeted all over the world and coerced everyone to accept – and now they are complaining about Crimea. Why is that?”

Doesn’t Putin have a point? Isn’t this what we’ve seen over and over again, that there’s one standard for the US and another for everyone else?

Of course it is. But Putin’s not going to stand for it. In fact, just this week, Russia’s Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov expanded on Putin’s comments in an interview that never appeared in the western media.  Here’s what he said:

“The current stage of international relations is marked by a transition to a fundamentally new world order – a polycentric model based on due regard for the appearance of new economic and financial centres. And political weight comes with economic and financial influence. Transition to a polycentric world order reflects an objective trend according to which the world order should be based on the world’s cultural and civilisational diversity. This is objective reality, which no one can deny. …

After a long period of dominance in global economy and politics, these countries are trying to keep their positions by artificial means. They know that their economic positions are not as strong as they were after WWII, when America accounted for over half of global GDP, but they are trying to use all available military and political instruments, social media, regime-change technology and other instruments to keep back the objective process of the development of a democratic world order based on the equality of all sides.

Not everyone has realized yet that it is impossible to move contrary to an objective historical process. We strongly hope that this will happen, because otherwise more illegal unilateral sanctions will be approved against Russia, to which we will respond accordingly, as we have already tried to do. But this, I repeat, is not our choice; we don’t want confrontation.” (Press Conference: Russia’s Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov)

“A new world order based on a polycentric model”? What a great idea. You mean, a world in which other sovereign nations get a say-so in the way the world is run?  You mean, a world in which the economic, political, and military decision-making does not emerge from one center of power that is dominated by privately-owned banks, transnational corporations and voracious western elites? You mean, a world in which international law can be applied evenly so that one country cannot unilaterally create off-shore gulags, or incite color coded revolutions, or carry out extra-legal abductions and killings, or order drone attacks on wedding parties or conduct any of the other heinous violations of human rights which imperial Washington engages in without batting an eye?

The NAF’s victory in east Ukraine brings us all one step closer to actualizing the multi-polar world of which Lavrov and Putin speak so glowingly. In fact, just hours ago Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko capitulated and signed a ceasefire agreement with the leaders of the anti-fascist militia, Igor Plotnitsky and Aleksandr Zakharchenko. (Remember: “We never negotiate with terrorists”?) Ukraine’s National Security Council (SNBO) has reported that its troops have halted all military actions. The government’s public statement reads as follows:

“According to the decision of the President of Ukraine and the order of the chief of the General staff of the military units of Ukraine, troops in the area of anti-terrorist operations ceased fire at 15.00 GMT.”

Peace at last?

It sure looks like it.

So while Obama is busy trying to ramp up the violence by rallying NATO to expand the wars around the world,  international peacekeepers will begin the thorny task of implementing a seven-point peace plan put forward by none-other-than Vladimir Putin.

The difference between the peacemakers and the warmongers has rarely been as stark as it is today.


MIKE WHITNEY lives in Washington state. He is a contributor to Hopeless: Barack Obama and the Politics of Illusion (AK Press). Hopeless is also available in a Kindle edition. He can be reached at

A Touch of Levity from the Radical Press Ha Ha Dept.

Prick! copy

Editorial on gay rights ‘disturbing’ by Arthur Topham

QuesCariSent Editor:Pub

[Editor’s Note: When I read the editorial in the Friday, August 9, 2013 edition of the Quesnel Observer I was not a happy camper. I’d been following the story on the net about what was going on in Russia regarding the homosexual agenda and knowing who is behind all of these activities I was glad to see at least one nation in the world still able to stand up to them and say “No!” not here. As a result I wrote  a letter to the editor expressing my opinion on the editorial. It was published in the August 23, 2013 edition. Both the editorial and my letter are printed below.]

Screen Shot 2013-08-25 at 5.31.23 PM

I’ve signed it; have you?

With the Sochi-Olympics six months away the eyes of the world are trained on the massive country, but not for the usual excitement over supreme athletic excellence.

It’s over the a law which Russian president Vladimir Putin bans “propaganda of no traditional sexual relations.”

The story made headlines then and more recently as US president Barack Obama cancelled a scheduled meeting for this September.

“I think they [Put and Russia] understand that for most of the countries that participate in the Olympics, we wouldn’t tolerate gays and lesbians being treated differently,” Obama said Tuesday to Jay Leno on NBC’s The Tonight Show.

Good for Obama, but we need to send a message to Russia that we, citizens of this fine earth, will not tolerate bis backwoods bullying and ignorant intolerance.

An online petition, All Out, Equality. Everywhere. is sweeping the web and providing a voice to each and every one of us who refuses to tolerate this kind of discrimination.

My online signature was number 340,457 – the goal is 350,000.

Once they reach their goal, the petition will be delivered to the International Olympic Committee head office – the one organization who could make a difference during this atrocious display of hateful, bigoted behaviour.

To sign your name and make a difference, check out,

~ Autumn MacDonald, Observer
August 9, 2013, P. A6


Digital version:

Autumn Macdonald – Editor
Quesnel Cariboo Observer
188 Carson Avenue
Quesnel, B.C. V2J 2A8
Autumn Macdonald


Re: Equality everywhere, Editorial, Cariboo Observer, Aug. 9, 2013

I found your editorial on “Gay rights” rather disturbing for reasons which I would like to touch upon here.

Over the past few decades two topics of discussion have become the subject of heated debate in the media, both of which fall into the general category of “political correctness”, a relatively recent phenomenon whose creation may reasonably be associated with Canada’s “human rights” organizations and the subsequent legislation that came to be as a result of pressure by special minority interest groups coupled with favourable support from the so-called “Liberal” or mainstream media.

The first of these controversial topics concerns any negative criticism of the political ideology of Zionism and the state of Israel and the second is any critical appraisal of homosexuality behaviour.

Basically both these topics have now become verboten and those who would dare to openly speak out on either of them face serious repercussions in terms of Canada’s “hate crime” laws which were set up to protect just such minorities and their circumscribed agendas.

Bringing the issue closer to home I was disappointed to find no rebuttals to your editorial were forthcoming from any of the many Christian churches that exist throughout the Quesnel area. The silence of the lambs was most disconcerting of all and exemplifies what I’m trying to say about this contentious issue.

Your promotion of the the online petition, All Out, Equality, Everywhere, in response to Russia’s recent legislation prohibiting the flaunting of the homosexual agenda and the adoption of young children by homosexual couples is, I feel, misguided, detrimental and unfair to the Russian nation.

George Santayana, the famed Spanish-American philosopher, in his book The Life of Reason, wrote that “Those who cannot remember the past are doomed to repeat it”, a saying that over the years has become a truism and one most apt when it comes to Russia and the West.

Here in the “liberated” West we tend to forget rather quickly the history of Russia over the past century and the brutal lessons they learned living under the dictatorship of the Marxist communists from 1917 until 1989.

We forget that under the soviet system, according to Nobel Peace Prize winner in literature Alexandr Solzhenitsyn, close to sixty-six million Russians were murdered or worked or intentionally starved to death over the tenure of soviet government and that the great bulk of these people were Christians including priests and nuns who were intentionally sought out for the grossest of torture and malevolent martyrdom.

Fortunately, for the Russians, they do remember who the elitists were that controlled the communist party and how their actions and political agenda served to destroy the moral, ethical and spiritual family values of what once was the great Christian Russian Republic.

It’s only been in recent years that the Russian people have been able to rebuild their lives and their Christian heritage and the thousands of churches that the Marxist communist dictatorship destroyed with malicious and heinous intent over the eight decades of their reign of terror.

For your editorial to suggest that the Russian government’s move to stem the blatant promotion of deviant lifestyles is an “atrocious display of hateful, bigoted behaviour” is to only reinforce Santayana’s words regarding historical realities and the lessons to be learned from them.

Russia is rebuilding its past and rebuilding its destroyed Christian spiritual foundations and in doing so is setting a positive, shining example for the West where all we see is a steady decline into immorality, licentiousness, depravity and decadence with the mainstream media, special interest groups and Hollywood leading the charge against healthy family values and sane, reasonable principles for living a loving, peaceful existence that have withstood the test of time since Christ first spoke his sermon on the mount.

Arthur Topham

Cottonwood, B.C.

Trayvon lunacy by John Kaminski


Trayvon lunacy


as well as the immigration destabilization plot

By John Kaminski

Well, the contrived Trayvon Martin courtroom circus is over, now that a national push from the powers that be to give black strangers skulking about in white neighborhoods immunity from suspicion and confrontation has failed.

Much-maligned Neighborhood Watch captain George Zimmerman was found innocent of second degree murder in the death of the hooded teen stranger, thanks to an eyewitness who saw Martin pounding Zimmerman’s head on the pavement before he was shot. The tense jury verdict vindicated the original assessment of the Sanford, Florida police chief hours after the shooting that no charges should be filed, although political pressure caused him to be fired for his common sense decision.

A cast of black celebrities including President Obama, Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton led a nationwide charge to overrule the sheriff’s entirely proper assessment. Their hysterical invective led to the appointment of a special prosecutor, which canceled the logical and legal requirements of empaneling a grand jury, which doubtless would have concluded that no crime had been committed.

Now, after a six-week-long soap opera and suspenseful jury deliberations, the fired sheriff’s original conclusion has been vindicated, Zimmerman walks and Trayvon, nearly beatified by the media despite his sketchy behavioral record in high school, is still dead.

That the trial was such a one-sided walk in the park for Zimmerman’s defense, black commentators on Fox News’ post mortem of the trial (hosted by none other than the king of hysteria, Geraldo Rivera) were tripping over their own tongues trying to spin the need for racial understanding, now that their (and the prosecution’s) malicious characterizations of George Zimmerman were determined by a jury to be utterly false.

Lost in the orgy of hand-wringing and breast-beating over the “tragedy” of Trayvon’s death was the side note that an employee of State Attorney’s office was fired for revealing to the defense team evidence that was withheld by the prosecution, which was cellphone photos of Martin presumably exhaling marijuana smoke.

Now that this unnecessary showpiece trial is over, and all those placards reading “Justice for Trayvon” can be packed away with all those “Free O.J.” T-shirts collected back in the ’90s, maybe the mawkish mainstream media can now turn its glaring attention to the issue of black-on-white crime, which dwarfs the reverse relationship by a ratio of at least 12-to-1.

In particular inside this issue is the practice of media not to name the race of criminal perpetrators in a steady stream of black-on-white rape/murders of not only young white women but also elderly white women, allowing the reality of this nationwide epidemic to remain relatively unknown to the general public.

Also critically needing to be discussed is the new phenomenon that is sweeping cities across the United States called “the Knockout Game”, in which gangs of unruly black teenagers seek hapless white victims to beat up. To win the game, the object is to render unconscious the unsuspecting victim with one punch, and examples of this new and sadistic social phenomenon are plentiful.

And a further enlargement of the discussion of racial understanding in this country (not to mention the world) would be to discern how America’s social infrastructure has been ravaged and destroyed by the inexplicable inflation of the U.S. population by unregulated immigration, particularly by the porous border philosophy practiced by the Obama government which has allowed crime rates to skyrocket in the southwestern border states and residents to flee their property in fear for their lives.

This policy, which included the now-infamous Fast and Furious fiasco in which Attorney General Eric Holder deliberately facilitated the delivery of automatic weapons to Mexican drug gangs, and was never charged for it, gives life to the claim that government officials in the U.S. do not obey the very laws they are supposed to enforce, and are actually working to destabilize the country.

These larger questions are the legacy of the Trayvon Martin incident, which are definitely not being addressed as the media wallows in kind of kumbiyah shoulder shrugging, mask their disappointment that they couldn’t put George Zimmerman in prison and set a precedent that black hoodlums would be free to roam white neighborhoods and not be challenged for their suspicious presence in locations where they simply shouldn’t be.

A simple glance at the police report of any newspaper in the United States should suffice to tell you why they shouldn’t be there.

After all, Zimmerman, the captain of his neighborhood’s security watch, challenged Martin because he was walking in the rain at night between houses wearing a hoodie in a place he shouldn’t have been. Shortly thereafter, Martin was slamming Zimmerman’s head on the pavement.

My opinion is not about racism, it’s about criminality, and the prudent prevention of it.

And it’s about a fairly recent trend in which black criminality is generally underplayed by media throughout the United States, creating the consensus notion that life in the black community is a lot more peaceful than it actually is.

There are large sections of America where ordinary law-abiding citizens should not go, murderous and decaying crack zones in practically every American city where crime is rampant and life is nasty and short. Detroit probably is the best example; the police there have publicly announced that they can’t protect anyone in large sections of the city.

And even since they passed strict new gun laws in Chicago, the murder rate has skyrocketed.

This is not just a problem in the United States. Holland has had to change its policies on immigration because the Muslim influx has destabilized the whole country and overtaxed its government’s social systems. In Sweden and Denmark serious rape epidemics by immigrant men against native females have the country in turmoil. Germany is being overrun by Turks, Great Britain by Africans. America is being deluged by refugees from everywhere who have deprived native citizens of their jobs and received such generous assistance from the government that it dwarfs what Americans who have paid into Social Security all their lives rightfully receive.

What is the purpose of all this contrived chaos, you might ask?

My answer would be that it is part of a worldwide plan to destabilize all the countries and make them more vulnerable to a police state takeover. The elevation of black attitudes through fictional media programs has left white American citizens feeling betrayed by their government, and they have been, especially with the ascension of a half-black president with no verifiable background or credentials who has done more to destroy the American Constitution than any other person in history.

Yes, he’s the guy who said, “If I had a son, he probably would have looked like Trayvon.”

Though Barack Obama is president of the United States, he’s not president of the white people in the United States. To them, he’s a traitor who has not and does not obey the very laws he took an oath to enforce. In fact, he has broken them repeatedly, and also supervised a continuing conspiracy of lies that has caused the deaths of millions of people around the world.

The Trayvon Martin case was an attempt by the powers that be, led by Obama, to kindle a race war in the United States, for the purpose of further destabilization of the social sinews that hold the country together. They chose the wrong case, and couldn’t make it stand up. That doesn’t mean they, and he, won’t try again, and given all the other horrendous maneuvers he’s inflicted on this formerly free country, he should be removed from office before he tries again.

Isn’t it obvious? He’s deliberately engineering the destruction of the country. And the George Zimmerman prosecution was just one more example of it, an attempt to deny people the right to defend themselves and send them to jail for crimes they did not commit.

Combined with false flag wars, prefabricated terror, deliberate environmental poisoning and medical care designed to kill people, it should be obvious to everyone by now that the twisted robots running the Jewish-infected government of the United States are the real criminals, and the people they are supposed to protect and defend are its victims.


John Kaminski is a writer who lives on the Gulf Coast of Florida, constantly trying to figure out why we are destroying ourselves, and pinpointing a corrupt belief system as the engine of our demise. Solely dependent on contributions from readers, please support his work by mail: 6871 Willow Creek Circle #103, North Port FL 34287 USA.