The Attacks on Pope Benedict – a Conspiracy of Man – or God? by Michael Hoffman

Pic&bioMHoffmanII
Thursday, April 08, 2010

The Attacks on Pope Benedict – a Conspiracy of Man – or God?

by Michael Hoffman

Over the centuries many sorts of masquers have bored deep into the bowels of the Roman Catholic Church. Some of these have even occupied the papal throne; others were content to be the power behind that throne.

King Henry VIII first received the theological justification for his divorce from Catherine of Aragon from the Neoplatonic brotherhood inside the Vatican; out of said fraternity would emerge Dr. John Dee, the Protestant magician who, using the Hermetic and Kabbalistic cunning of the Roman Catholic magician Marsilio Ficino, furnished William Cecil with the mind control keys and mass persuasion techniques that gained him the rule of England through a reanimated goddess Isis who is known to history as Queen Elizabeth I.

Very few believing Catholics ever glimpse this hidden reality, and when they are so privileged as to gain a fleeting vision of it, they run from it, so threatening is it to the papal Caesarism to which they kowtow like the pagan subjects of Kubla Khan. Jesus Christ did not come to institute slavish and cowering obedience to mere men, however elaborately costumed or adored. He came to save souls, which is the highest law, a law recognized by only a few churchmen, such as the late French Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, who defied Popes Paul VI and John Paul II for that very reason.

Behind the scenes of the competing Catholic and Protestant churches exists a golden thread, a rainbow bridge if you will, that unites initiates in both camps who, believing they possess godlike powers derived from the secret gnosis of the Corpus Hermeticum, are above the morality they publicly preach, beyond good and evil, and united in processing humankind toward a “higher” destiny without the knowledge or consent of those being processed. This is the age-old mandate of the pagan-occult imperium.

Shortly before the latest uproar over pederasty within the Roman Catholic Church, a Vatican exorcist announced that the devil was active in the Vatican, even at the highest levels. Prior to this not exactly  unexpected revelation, Pope Benedict XVI completed the third of his pilgrimages to the Synagogue, the latest, on Jan. 17, at Rome itself, where this papal Judas gave every encouragement to the assembled Pharisees.

Most recently he has appointed a member of the secret society of Opus Dei to head the powerful diocese of Los Angeles, California, after child-molestation enabler and obstructor of justice Cardinal Roger Mahony retires next year with his pension intact and full church honors accorded to this patron of pederasty.

Certain Catholic automatons have marched forth, decrying a purported “media conspiracy” of “gossip” against the pope. But are the troubles that have befallen this pope a conspiracy of man, or a curse of God?

How long do the vassals of Rome imagine that God will be mocked by popes who make common cause with the ideological and spiritual descendants of those who stoned, laid hands upon and conspired in the murder of His Divine Son?

Pope John Paul II, the modern champion of the Synagogue and the first pope in history to enter its precincts as a supplicant, spent the final years of his pontificate as a hunchback, drooling spittle onto his breast. Unless he repents and makes reparation, Pope Benedict XVI can no more escape the wrath of God than did his predecessor.

If Benedict is besieged now, it may be payback for his treason to the Gospel of Jesus Christ, notwithstanding his provisional revival of the old Latin Mass, which he has integrated into a neo-Catholic hybrid Church of Holocaustianity, whereby Auschwitz is rendered far more sacred than Calvary, a revolutionary betrayal made tolerable now that it is accompanied by Tridentine incense and Gregorian chant.

Those badly deceived persons who make common cause with this pontiff might wish to consider what fate may be in store if they do not switch their allegiance from Benedict to Jesus.

———–

Copyright ©2010 by RevisionistHistory.org

JudaismDiscoveredAd       BishopWilliamsonSupportAd
Hoffman is the author of seven books of history and literature, including Judaism Discovered. He edits Revisionist History, a newsletter published six times a year. The latest issue, on “The Money Power,” is available for purchase online.

Bishop Wants to “Examine Evidence” of Holocaust Before Recanting with Commentary by Michael Hoffman

ZundelHonsikStolzDees

(A commentary by Michael Hoffman on this report from Deutsche-Welle immediately follows the article).

Bishop Wants to “Examine Evidence” of Holocaust Before Recanting

Deutsche-Welle

Feb. 7, 2009
http://www.dw-world.de/dw/article/0,,4010109,00.html

A bishop recently rehabilitated by Pope Benedict XVI said he want to “examine the evidence” of the Holocaust before possibly recanting his statement that no Jews died in Nazi gas chambers, a German newsmagazine reported.

Even as Vatican officials were working to control the damage caused by Pope Benedict XVI’s decision to rehabilitate a Richard Williamson, a bishop who denied the Holocaust in an interview, with papal meetings and inter-faith dialogue, Williamson told Germany’s Der Spiegel news weekly he needed time to scrutinize data surrounding the Holocaust. “If I find proof I would rectify (earlier statements) … but all that will take time,” Williamson was quoted as saying by magazine on Saturday, Feb. 7. “I ask everyone to believe me that I did not deliberately say something
false. I was, on the basis of my research in the 1980s, convinced of the accuracy of my comments. Now I must examine everything again and look at the evidence.”

Benedict called on Williamson to retract statements he made about the Holocaust. The pope had demanded Williamson unequivocally distance himself statements he made in an interview with Swedish television in which he said only up to 300,000 Jews were murdered in Nazi concentration camps. Historians put the figure at 6 million. Williamson has apologized to the pope “for the unnecessary distress” he has caused him but has not apologized to Jews.

The Vatican has said Benedict was not aware of the statements Williamson made two days before the excommunication was lifted. Italian priest also denies extent of Holocaust The ultra-traditionalist Roman Catholic group Society of Saint Pius X (SSPX), of which Williamson is a member, has expelled an Italian priest who said he believed gas chambers at Nazi death camps were only used to “disinfect” inmates. SSPX’s Italian branch said Father Floriano Abrahamowicz was expelled for “serious disciplinary reasons,” the ANSA news agency reported citing a SSPX statement issued Friday. Abrahamowicz made the remarks while defending Williamson. Inter-faith dialogue to continue.

The pope has expressed his solidarity with Jews since lifting the excommunications Israel’s chief Rabbinate is resuming dialogue with the Vatican after ties were put on ice following the pope’s decision to lift the excommunication of Williamson and three other priests of the ultra-traditionalist Society of St Pius X (SSPX), Reuters news agency reported Saturday. The Rabbinate pulled out of a meeting with Vatican officials scheduled for the beginning of March amid an international outcry over the bishops’ rehabilitation.

The meeting will now take place in late February or mid-March and will most likely include a papal audience. Benedict is also scheduled to meet with the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations (CPMAJO) on Thursday to make amends, Retuers reported. Both the meetings, however, were planned before Williamson’s statement to Der Spiegel.

The head of the German Bishops Council, Archbishop Robert Zollitsch, renewed his call for Williamson to be, once again, excommunicated from the Catholic Church, calling the British-born Williamson “irresponsible.” “I do not see any room for him in the Catholic Church,” Zollitsch told the Bild am Sonntag newspaper, in an article to be published on Sunday.

HOFFMAN COMMENTS
Feb. 7, 2009

The tenor of this article from the untrustworthy German-Zionist press is that Bishop Williamson is about to recant and intends to recant unless new revisionist evidence convinces him otherwise. This is not the case. His intentions are pure. He is only keeping an open mind. He has made no decision to recant and he is not disposed to recant unless the exterminationists can prove their case. As Robert Faurisson, Arthur R. Butz, Carlo Mattogno, Samuel Crowell, Paul Grubach, Fred Leutchter, Gerd [Honsik a.t.], Richard Widmann, Brian Renk and many other competent and courageous revisionist scholars have shown, the case for the execution gas chambers of Auschwitz-Birkenau has never been more flimsy.

For myself (I am not speaking for Bishop Williamson!) St. Paul gave us the warrant to doubt in Titus 1:14: “Not giving heed to Jewish fables, and commandments of men, that turn from the truth.”

If the whole media were tomorrow to confront me and say I must believe that the moon is made of green cheese, it is not incumbent on me to prove that it is not made of green cheese! The obligation is on those who assert the proposition.

This writer is forever absolved from having to believe in the homicidal gas chambers of Auschwitz. I was a reporter at the first show trial of publisher Ernst Zundel in Toronto in 1985. I reported it from the press gallery in the courtroom, as an accredited member of the media. I observed as the “infallible” Judaic “eyewitnesses” to the gassings were finally cross-examined instead of pampered and worshipped, in this case the cross-examination was conducted by the skilled defense attorney Doug Christie, guided by Prof. Faurisson, who led the Zundel defense team. Under cross-examination it was these Judaic “infallible eyewitnesses” who we are commanded by the Vatican to believe as if they were the angels of heaven–it was they who recanted, including the famous War Refugee Board “eyewitness” Rudolf Vrba.

[Read more...]

Gaza Massacre: What’s missing? by Michael Hoffman

http://revisionistreview.blogspot.com/2009/01/gaza-massacre-whats-missing.html

Gaza Massacre: What’s missing?
by Michael Hoffman

Monday, January 12, 2009
www.RevisionistHistory.org

This writer has the sorrowful distinction of having observed and reported more than twenty-six years’ worth of Israeli massacres of Arabs, beginning with Beirut in the summer of 1982, when Ariel Sharon’s military terror-bombed schools, hospitals, apartment blocs and nursing homes in an incredible orgy of violence. There were many more Israeli atrocities to follow: in Qana, Jenin, Gaza 2006, and of course carpet-bombing throughout Lebanon in 2007.

Then as now, an impotent Arab “street” along with leftist intellectuals and protesters in Europe, issued demands and furiously paraded with “smash Zionism” placards. The UN met in special session and “deplored” Israeli actions. Investigations were called for, and in Jenin, “war crimes investigations” were demanded, which, in the case of Jenin, were rebuffed by Shimon Peres, who defiantly declared, “No one judges Israel!”

As usual the Israelis in Gaza are taking a crap on an entire people, along with the infrastructure of Gaza’s government, housing, educational system and their fire-fighting and medical facilities. This is not just an attack on Hamas, but as we saw in Jenin, on the Palestinian people’s ability to govern, educate, house and protect themselves.

As always happens when these Talmudic war crimes transpire, Israeli hasbara (propaganda) operations go into high gear, and we are seeing the pattern repeat in Gaza now. Every single atrocity is explained away as either collateral damage or “terrorists using the civilian population as a shield.” By that standard the US government was “shielding itself” in the Twin Towers in New York City in September, 2001.

[Read more...]