Regina v Radical Press Legal Update #26 by Arthur Topham

Regina v Radical Press Legal Update #26

Dear Free Speech Defenders and Radical Press Supporters,

On February 17th, 2017 the long-awaited decision in the Regina v. Roy Arthur Topham constitutional Charter challenge to Sec. 319(2) of the Canadian Criminal Code was handed down by The Honourable Mr. Justice Butler in the Supreme Court of British Columbia. I will append below the first 7 paragraphs of Justice Butler’s decision as an introduction to the whole document which consists of a total of 82 paragraphs. The complete decision can be found at the following url for anyone wishing to study the document in full: https://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcsc/doc/2017/2017bcsc259/2017bcsc259.html

It should be born in mind that this decision focused on a Ruling involving a legal issue known as the Bedford Threshold. It was not a ruling on the actual Charter challenge to Sec. 319(2). In order to challenge any Supreme Court of Canada ruling one must first gain entrance to those hallowed chambers by meeting the threshold established in the Bedford case wherein this test initially arose.

As I had explained in my previous Legal Update for November 19th, 2016 constitutional notice was first served to the Crown on March 23rd, 2015 and the process, such as it was, did not conclude until November 8th and 9th, 2016 in Victoria, B.C. where the final two days of argument took place.

It was Crown’s position that they wanted the Constitutional Charter challenge put off until after the end of the trial. Following the pre-trial hearing on the matter that began in Vancouver, BC’s SC on June 22nd, 2015 – in his Reasons for Judgment handed down July 8, 2015 – SC Justice Butler, citing case law, ruled that it would be better to hold off on the Charter argument until after the trial so as to not “fragment” the criminal proceedings. He also decided that in the case of constitutional challenges it’s better to wait until after the trial to adjudicate such issues because by then a “factual foundation” would be in place.

Prior to Justice Butler’s decision of July 8th, during a June 10th, 2015 appearance, he ruled that in order for the Constitutional Charter challenge to proceed it would first be necessary for the Defence to provide sound reasons which would satisfy the Justice that the “Bedford Threshold” had been met in order for the proceedings to move to the stage where the actual challenge to the legislation would take place.

In a nutshell the Bedford “Test” or “Threshold”, as it’s often called, is a decision of the Supreme Court of Canada in Canada (Attorney General) v Bedford handed down on December 20, 2013, wherein the Supreme Court ruled that some of Canada’s prostitution laws were unconstitutional. Bedford was the surname of one of the three prostitutes who challenged the legislation.

One of the principal issues that the S.C. of Canada deliberated in that case was whether a trial judge could consider Charter arguments not raised in a previous case about the same law. Legal tradition has always held that a lower court (in my case the BC S.C.) is ‘bound’ by decisions made by the SC of Canada. It’s this particular principle and precedent (in Latin called stare decisis) which Crown has been arguing over-rides my arguments as presented in my Memorandum of Argument Regarding the Threshold Issue wherein I stated that the decision in Keegstra is no longer binding upon my case due to similarities with the Bedford case where the Supreme Court of Canada found that lower courts may revisit binding authorities from higher courts in cases where new legal issues are raised, or where a change in the evidence or circumstances fundamentally shifts the parameters of the debate.

The Honourable Justice Butler ruled in favour of the Crown’s argument and in Paragraph 6 states: This is my decision on the threshold issue. For the reasons that follow, I conclude that this case does not meet the threshold necessary to reconsider Keegstra and Mr. Topham’s application challenging the constitutionality of s. 319(2) is dismissed.”

The actual date set for Justice Butler to hand down his decision has been set for March 10th, 2017 in the B.C. Supreme Court in Quesnel, B.C. The mainstream media has already been publishing fake news stories stating that I will be sentenced on that date. Such is not the case. Once the decision is read out in court on March 10th a new date will then be set for sentencing to occur. That date is yet to be determined.

As things currently stand I will be faced with having to decide what my options will be once I know what Crown is asking for during the actual sentencing when the time arrives.

I will then attempt to inform readers in another Legal Update.

Sincerely,

Arthur Topham
Pub/Ed
RadicalPress.com
“Digging to the root of the issues since 1998.”

 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA

Citation:      R. v. Topham,

                   2017 BCSC 259

Date: 20170217

Docket: 25166

Registry: Quesnel

 Regina 

v.

Roy Arthur Topham 

Before: The Honourable Mr. Justice Butler

Ruling on Bedford Threshold Issue 

           Counsel for the Crown: Rodney G. Garson
           Counsel for the Accused: Barclay W. Johnson
          Place and Date of Trial/Hearing: Quesnel, B.C. October 3-6, 2016

Vancouver, B.C. October 19, 2016

Victoria, B.C. November 8 and 9, 2016

         Place and Date of Judgment: Quesnel, B.C. February 17, 2017

[1]           On November 12, 2015, following a 14-day trial, Arthur Topham was convicted by a jury of one count of willfully promoting hatred against an identifiable group, people of the Jewish religion or ethnic origin, contrary to s. 319(2) of the Criminal Code. Prior to the trial, he brought an application pursuant to the Constitutional Question Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 68, challenging the constitutionality of s. 319(2). I heard that application and in reasons indexed as R. v. Topham, 2015 BCSC 1185 (CanLII), ruled that the hearing of the application should take place following the trial, in the event of a conviction. Part of the rationale for that decision was that if Mr. Topham was convicted, there would be a factual foundation for the constitutional challenge. He has now renewed the application.

[2]           In R. v. Keegstra, 1990 CanLII 24 (SCC), [1990] 3 S.C.R. 697, the Supreme Court of Canada considered the constitutional validity of s. 319(2) of the Criminal Code. The Court found that the section infringed the right to freedom of expression guaranteed by s. 2(b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Part I of the Constitution Act, 1982 being Schedule B to the Canada Act 1982 (U.K.), 1982 c. 11 (the “Charter”). However, the majority also concluded that the Criminal Code provision was saved by s. 1 of the Charter as a reasonable limit that was demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society.

[3]           Given the doctrine that lower courts must follow the decisions of higher courts, Keegstra is binding on this Court. However, as the Supreme Court of Canada explained in Canada (Attorney General) v. Bedford, 2013 SCC 72 (CanLII), at para. 42, there are circumstances in which a lower court can depart from a binding statement of law. That can be done in only two situations: 1) where a new legal issue is raised; and 2) where there “is a change in circumstances or evidence that fundamentally shifts the parameters of the debate”.

[4]           The defence says that this Court does not have to follow Keegstra, as both situations which allow for departure from a binding precedent exist in this case. Further, the defence says that the s. 1 determination in Keegstra is not binding on this Court. The Crown takes the position that Keegstra is binding and that neither situation which would allow for reconsideration of that ruling is present.

[5]           In light of Bedford, and in order to resolve the dispute over the application of Keegstra, the parties agreed that Mr. Topham’s application should be considered in two stages. At the first stage, the Court would consider whether the Bedford threshold for reconsidering the Keegstra ruling has been met. In a hearing which lasted seven days, Mr. Topham presented evidence which he says is relevant to reconsideration of the ruling and the parties advanced argument on the threshold issue.

[6]           This is my decision on the threshold issue. For the reasons that follow, I conclude that this case does not meet the threshold necessary to reconsider Keegstra and Mr. Topham’s application challenging the constitutionality of s. 319(2) is dismissed. Accordingly, there is no need for the second stage of the application. For clarity, and in the event this decision is overturned on appeal, I note that the parties contemplated and I agreed that at the second stage, the Crown would be permitted to present evidence relevant to the s. 1 issue: whether s. 319(2) of the Criminal Code is a reasonable limitation on s. 2(b) of the Charter. Of course, at the second stage the parties would also have the opportunity to present argument on the constitutional issues, including on the question of an appropriate remedy under s. 52 of the Constitution Act, 1982.

The Bedford Threshold

[7]           The threshold that must be met before a lower court can reconsider a binding authority is set out in Bedford. In that case, lower courts were asked to reconsider the decision in Reference re ss. 193 and 195.1(1)(c) of the Criminal Code (Man.), 1990 CanLII 105 (SCC), [1990] 1 S.C.R. 1123. The Court agreed that lower courts may, in limited circumstances, revisit conclusions reached in binding decisions of the Supreme Court of Canada. That is the case even though, “[c]ertainty in the law requires that courts follow and apply authoritative precedents” and that is “the foundational principle upon which the common law relies.”

____________

There are still bills to pay and costs involved so if there is any chance supporters can afford to contribute toward these expenses I would be sincerely appreciative of any assistance. Please go the following website to making a donation or else send a donation to the mailing address shown below:
Arthur Topham
4633 Barkerville Highway
Quesnel, B.C.
V2J 6T8
THANK YOU!
Arthur Topham
Pub/Ed
The Radical Press
Canada’s Radical News Network
“Digging to the root of the issues since 1998”
–––––––– 88 ––––––––
*** (Note please that the full transcript of the trial can be found HERE for those interested in reading it and preserving it should my website eventually be taken down.

Point of Light By Arthur Topham

Point of Light
By
Arthur Topham
January 1st, 2017
pointoflight-copy-4

“There is a point when you cannot walk away
When you have to stand up straight and tall and mean the words you say
There is a point you must decide, just to do it ’cause it’s right
That’s when you become a point of light.”
~ Randy Travis, Point of Light

As the year 2017 begins to unfold we find ourselves living in a time of extreme darkness and evil. Trailing years of wars, bloodshed and acts of terrorism on par with those of the French Revolution, 2016 inevitably culminated – on New Year’s Eve – with yet another act of satanic bloodletting as if to reassure the masses that any hope of peace is not part of the Devil’s equation.

And so it begs the question for those of us, the seekers of real Truth, Light, Justice and Peace who are now treading ever so lightly upon a world overshadowed by fear, insecurity, doubt and a deep and unnerving sense of suspended hope, what course we will and must follow in the days and months ahead.

The Trump card still remains a mystery to all but the 45th President and his close advisors as the American Republic inches closer and closer to their own reckoning with Fate. Will Donald actually “drain the swamp” of the elitist bottom feeders and their Talmudic taskmasters who have inexorably pursued the demise of that once great nation since 1913 as he unequivocally stated again and again throughout the US election campaign? No one outside the new insiders truly knows although speculation has been building to a deafening crescendo on blog sites around the world with each passing day.

So much is out of our direct control but regardless there still remains some fundamental truths that no fickleness on the part of mainstream media can alter. First off we know beyond certainty that the global mainstream media throughout the Western world is absolutely under the control of the Zionist Jew Rothschild criminal cartel and that ALL ZIONIST NEWS IS FAKE NEWS. Secondly, we know that more and more people throughout the Western world are turning to the Alternative News media in search of real news along with real interpretations of events and a whole host of broad-ranging opinions and perspectives that resonate with fundamental human values such as honesty, morality, authenticity, open-mindedness and plain-dealing. The third and still growing certitude is the revelation that the swamp is infested with #pizza-eating satanic, demonic entities who thrive upon the basest of human behaviours that span the gamut of grotesque to despicable in terms of pedophilia, beastiality, cannibalism and child sacrifice.

strike3-700

In other words those who now run the world have three strikes against them and the general consensus of the common people is that it’s game over and time for them to leave the playing field. The only problem is they don’t want to leave, nor do they want to play by the rules of the game but would rather institute their own rules as they go along depending upon whether or not they think they’re ahead and winning or losing ground.

Now of course they’re finally coming to the realization that way too many people are on to their scams and they have to come up with a whole new ball game; one that will not only be a total game changer but also will prevent the masses from gaining further information about their nefarious schemes to destroy all semblance of the natural order of Man and substitute it with a hodgepodge of perverse, Nihilistic, satanic sexually-deviant behaviours designed to severe forever the heart and soul of humanity from its original transcendental Source. If it sounds diabolical that’s because it is. If it sounds incredibly dangerous that’s also because it is.

So the New World Order has finally struck out. They’ve been exposed through the Internet by the Truth Revealers and now stand stark-butt naked before a world fraught and fuming with anxiety, mistrust, disgust and a fiercely-felt form of universal outrage.

What to do?

That is the question for those who have, as the old saying goes, “seen the light”. One of American’s great Country & Western singers Randy Travis, has, I believe, offered us a clue to what we must do in his song from which the title of this article was taken:

“There is a point when you cannot walk away
When you have to stand up straight and tall and mean the words you say
There is a point you must decide, just to do it ’cause it’s right
That’s when you become a point of light.”

God, Truth, Love and Light are synonymous terms that identify the One source of not only Life per se but all Existence upon all planes from the most sub-atomic to the highest of the Divine. Put in layman’s terms by the Christian Bible in Genesis for all to See are the following words:

“And God said, Let there be light: and there was light.
And God saw the light, that it was good: and God divided the light from the darkness.”

lightprotector-copy

The division or gulf between the Light and darkness is now reaching its zenith and as the darkness appears to be waxing in power and presence so does the resplendence of the Light workers continue to grow and glow against this background gestalt of blackness and evil that vainly would attempt to entrance and snuff out our individual candles of Light and turn heaven on Earth into a hell of perversity and hatred.

Those who, for myriad reasons, have already sold their souls to the Devil in a last-ditch, Mephistophelian attempt to acquire power over others and the planet Itself, are beyond the ken of redemption and their fate is sealed. In terms of brevity they’ve been labeled by the Truth Revealers as the “1%”. Juxtaposed with that 1% are the Light bringers whose numbers we still cannot pin-point. All we can say with any certainty is that they are the individual points of light that Randy Travis speaks of in his song and that their numbers, judging by internet stats, are legion and growing at an exponential rate. It is here that we find our greatest and most valuable weapon in the battle between Good and Evil; here that we realize we have within us the power of Understanding and, but for lack of courage and self-confidence, we can exercise our divinely given Free Will and SHARE that light of understanding with our fellow human beings who are still searching for the real news; the real Truth and not the endless litany of LIES and DECEPTION that the world has been consistently subjected to over the past century and longer. Again, I repeat Travis’s words:

“There is a point when you cannot walk away
When you have to stand up straight and tall and mean the words you say
There is a point you must decide, just to do it ’cause it’s right
That’s when you become a point of light.”

There are millions, if not billions, of people on Gaia, our Mother Ship who are still innocent of the evil that has taken over so much of our planet. They are, metaphorically speaking, the slumbering ones who for countless reasons have not yet been able to find enough of the missing pieces of the puzzle that they might see the bigger picture and realize what’s happening to them, their families, their friends and their communities and countries. Each of them is, as yet, a wick unlit; a candle awaiting the flame of Truth that will not only enlighten their inner sense of Self but will, in turn, motivate them, as Travis sang, “to stand up straight and tall and mean the words” they say. And they’ll do it “cause it’s right” and because they’ll finally understand that the power to change the world for the better lies within ourselves and not in some alien, surrogate political system outside themselves that allows for the grievous errors and darkness which now afflict the vast majority of Humanity.

themanwhofights

Let the Light continue to spread in 2017 and let it drive back the darkness and the suffering and the injustices that sorely oppress the bulk of Mankind. The time to stand up and speak out is NOW. Share the Truth and spread the Light and help dispel the NWO night!

Merry Christmas from RadicalPress.com

goldenchristmasgreetingsrp-copy

B’nai Brith attack on Canadian professor has roots in Zionist false flag tactics by RAFIQ for the American Herald Tribune

amhertribune

OCTOBER 13 ,2016

BY RAFIQ
B’nai Brith attack on Canadian professor has roots in Zionist false flag tactics
anthony_hall_bb_6208e
Anthony Hall

In late August a sensational anti-Jewish screed and graphic were posted on the Facebook page of University of Lethbridge professor Anthony Hall.

1113

As a result, B’nai Brith Canada launched a legal campaign against Dr. Hall for committing a “hate crime,” followed by an ongoing campaign to have him dismissed from his tenured position after twenty-six years.

fb_bb_22ad81111-1Although the racist, hate-mongering Facebook post was ostensibly put on Dr. Hall’s page by someone self-identified as “Glen Davidson,” B’nai Brith launched no legal campaign against this person. Instead, it succeeded in having the Lethbridge Police Service open an investigation of Dr. Hall. As reported by CTV News Calgary, B’nai Brith said that “by allowing” the anti-Semitic post “to remain on his Facebook page, Hall was committing a hate crime.” [1]

CTV News Calgary went on to falsely report that “Hall did eventually remove the offending post.” In fact Dr. Hall didn’t know about the post’s existence until after B’nai Brith had successfully lobbied Facebook to take it down. As reported by Now Magazine, Facebook removed the post after initially, and ludicrously, claiming that it didn’t violate the website’s standards. [2]

For its part, as reported by J.W. Schnarr at the Lethbridge Herald (Sept. 29, 2016), the Lethbridge Police Service has stated that the post, “while extremely offensive and inappropriate, does not meet the threshold for intent set out in the Criminal Code of Canada for advocating genocide or public incitement of hatred.’” [3] Although this finding fails to dissociate Dr. Hall from the anti-Semitic posting and thus does nothing to restore his reputation, the upshot is that no criminal charges are going to be laid against him for committing a “hate crime.”

lh_c389aSo if not a hate crime, what are the grounds for B’nai Brith’s ongoing campaign to destroy the career of a respected historian known for his moral courage in standing up for Indigenous rights both in Canada and around the world? And why has the University of Lethbridge decided to bow to the pressure of B’nai Brith and seek Dr. Hall’s dismissal, as reported in the American Herald Tribune? [4]

According to the Lethbridge Herald, at issue are claims against Dr. Hall that involve “the alleged spread of conspiracy theories and anti-Zionist propaganda.” The newspaper goes on to explain that Dr. Hall “promotes the idea of a global Zionist conspiracy to foster hatred of Muslims through ‘false flag’ terror events, beginning with the 9/11 terror attacks in New York City.” [5] CTV News Calgary adds that Dr. Hall is known for “condemning Israel and implying agents of that country were behind the 9/11 attacks in New York.” [6]

These statements make it clear that Dr. Hall has aligned himself against Zionism and against the political machinations of Israel. Nowhere is it suggested that Dr. Hall has aligned himself against the Jewish people. Yet B’nai Brith insists that Zionism and the Jewish people are synonymous and that to question Zionism is to be anti-Semitic. The two are conflated in its rhetoric against Dr. Hall:

B’nai Brith continues to demand that the University of Lethbridge investigate, to guarantee that students are not subjected to Hall’s anti-Zionist itinerary.

Does the University of Lethbridge feel that Holocaust denial, accusations of world Zionist conspiracy plots and antisemitism are the legitimate “results of research and scholarship?”

Hall’s personal antisemitism cannot be separated from his academic career. [7]

anti-semitism_adca1

Here, Dr. Hall’s stance against Zionism is conflated with denial of the Jewish holocaust and with anti-Semitism – understood as hatred of Jews. It makes no difference that Dr. Hall has been legally absolved of committing a “hate crime.” It makes no difference that in an article he published in the American Herald Tribune, he has vocally decried the racist posting placed on his Facebook page. [8] B’nai Brith has branded him an “anti-Semite.” As Now Magazine puts it in a slanderous and libelous article smearing Dr. Hall, his critique of Zionism means that he is a “Jew-hater.” [9]

The University of Lethbridge has given every indication that it agrees with this assessment. In early October university president Dr. Michael Mahon declared that Dr. Hall’s actions “appear to contravene Section 3 of the Alberta Human Rights Act,” and he promptly suspended Dr. Hall without pay while the university investigates the situation. In explaining his suspension of a tenured professor without due process and without any finding of wrongdoing, Dr. Mahon echoed the accusations and rhetoric of B’nai Brith, citing both the use of Dr. Hall’s Facebook page “for virulent anti-semitic comments” and his research into Israel’s role in 9/11, which Dr. Mahon interprets as an accusation against “Jewish individuals,” absurdly denying Israel’s diverse ethnic makeup.

aht_mahon_5c7b3

jews_mossad_0d0c3

wtc7_d48eb

Dictionaries generally define “Zionism” as “a political movement that supports the maintenance and preservation of the state of Israel as a Jewish homeland, originally arising in the late 1800s with the goal of re-establishing a Jewish homeland in the region of Palestine.” [10] This proper view of Zionism as “a political movement” distinct from Jewish people themselves is supported by many individuals and organizations within the Jewish community. They condemn the genocidal tactics used by Israel in its campaign against the Palestinian people as it seeks to create a state that is solely Jewish.

msm_israel_6db0d

For example, in a recent fundraising email, Jewish Voice for Peace provides this testimony from a retreat participant, “Jake said he’d grown up participating in Zionist youth movements, and travelling to Israel. So when he began to understand the extent of human rights abuses against Palestinians, and the lengths that mainstream Jewish society goes to silence them, he felt like he’d lost something huge. He believed he’d never feel at home in a Jewish community again. And then he found JVP.” [11]

jvp_3403a

The website True Torah Jews takes an even stronger stand against the Zionist political project. In an article explaining that the German Zionists colluded with the National Socialists in creating hostility against the Jews of Germany as a means of ensuring their expulsion to Palestine, the website writes, “We implore and beseech our Jewish brethren to realize that the Zionists are not the saviors of the Jewish People and guarantors of their safety, but rather the instigators and original cause of Jewish suffering in the Holy Land and worldwide.” [12]

israel_cartoon_62a6f

Indeed, under the Transfer Agreement of 1933, concluded between Adolf Hitler’s National Socialist government and Chaim Arlosoroff of the World Zionist Organization, tens of thousands of German Jews were able to migrate to Palestine with their wealth. This seemingly humane cooperation between the National Socialists and the Zionists was in fact based on their shared racist ideas about ethnicity and nationhood. Both agreed that for the good of each “race,” Germans and Jews should no longer live side by side. Absolute separation of the “races” was necessary.

haavara_252da

Thus, when the National Socialists adopted the “Nuremberg laws” of 1935, which prohibited sex and marriage between Germans and Jews, who were no longer regarded as Germans but reconceived as an “alien minority,” the Zionists were pleased. Only on a rising tide of anti-Semitic sentiment could the Zionist political project be achieved. The founder of modern Zionism, Theodor Herzl, “maintained that anti-Semitism is not an aberration, but a natural and completely understandable response by non-Jews to alien Jewish behavior and attitudes. The only solution, he argued, is for Jews to recognize reality and live in a separate state of their own.” [13]

The article by True Torah Jews goes on to explain the tactics of such Zionists – thus shedding light on the conduct of B’nai Brith and its accolades at Now Magazine:

It has been the age-old intention of Zionism to intentionally stir up anti-Semitism anywhere possible, and even more commonly, to take advantage of any Jewish suffering anywhere in order to enhance its cause. Indeed, hatred of Jews and Jewish suffering is the oxygen of the Zionist movement, and from the very beginning [its intention] has been to deliberately incite hatred of the Jew and then, in feigned horror, use it to justify the existence of the Zionist state – this is, of course, Machiavellianism raised to the highest degree. Thus, the Zionists thrive on hatred and suffering of Jews, and seek to benefit thereby through keeping Jews in perpetual fear, causing them to ignore the true nature of Zionism, and instead to consider the Zionist state as their salvation.

In his article in the American Herald Tribune discussing his treatment at the hands of B’nai Brith Canada, Dr. Hall speculates that B’nai Brith may have been behind the anti-Semitic screed and graphic that were posted on his Facebook page. [14] The Lethbridge Herald makes note of this observation: “The discussion also turned to the possibility that some of the organizations currently demanding Hall be disciplined for his statements could have made the posting themselves in order to discredit him and to fuel their argument.” [15] However, this concern is framed by the Lethbridge Herald as dismissible out of hand and in need of no actual journalistic investigation.

Yet the description of Zionism offered by True Torah Jews suggests that Dr. Hall may indeed be right about the tactics being employed against him by B’nai Brith. Clearly, in the case of Dr. Hall, B’nai Brith is bent on seeing anti-Semitism where there is none. Moreover, B’nai Brith does not appear to have attempted to identify or pursue charges against the claimed poster of the racist screed and graphic, “Glen Davidson.” Nor has it sought to identify or pursue charges against the creator of the posting, even though it depicts a known cartoonist, Ben Garrison, assaulting an Orthodox Jew.

If the Lethbridge Herald had done some investigating, it would have unearthed a story that is entirely consistent with the description of Zionism offered by True Torah Jews. It would have discovered what Arthur Topham of Radical Press learned when he contacted Garrison and asked him about the anti-Semitic posting, in which Garrison is supposed to profess, “I will not rest until every single filthy, parasitic kike is rounded up and slaughtered. The greedy hook-nosed kikes know that their days are numbered … KILL ALL JEWS NOW! EVERY LAST ONE.”

hall_bb_01a73

* Original Post Planted on Dr. Hall’s Facebook page and then removed by Facebook without any notice at to the victim of the social media false flag from Facebook or its partner B’nai Brith

In Garrison’s words, “that Photoshopped image of me assaulting that Orthodox Jewish man continues to circulate and be posted everywhere. Ironically, it was created by a 20 year old Jewish kid named Joshua Goldberg. He was arrested by the FBI about a year ago for sending bomb making instructions to what he thought was a Muslim terrorist – instead it was an FBI undercover agent. Goldberg is now pleading mental illness, but for years he was allowed to stir up trouble from his parent’s basement in Florida. For some reason he enjoyed targeting me and he’s the one who created that image as well as many other hate screeds.” [16]joshua_goldberg_1ada2

1113-1

Joshua Goldberg’s arrest is confirmed by newspaper reports. One is in the Sydney Morning Herald, where we learn that Goldberg “is suspected of a number of other online hoaxes, including posing online as prominent Australian lawyer, Josh Bornstein … In the Bornstein hoax, Goldberg established a blog on the Times of Israel in the lawyer’s name before posting an inflammatory article calling for the ‘extermination’ of Palestinians. The Times retracted the article and apologised.’” [17]

In response to the revelations about Goldberg, Dr. Kevin Barrett of Truth Jihad Radio has called the anti-Semitic post that turned up on Dr. Hall’s Facebook page a “weaponized image” that “was created by a Jewish-Zionist false flag provocateur and instigator of phony ‘Islamic terrorism,’ presumably to be used precisely the way it was deployed against Tony Hall.” [18] Indeed, Goldberg’s own description of one of his other plots is consistent with this conclusion. As reported in the Sydney Morning Herald, “the fake jihadi also claimed a friendship with anti-Islamophobia campaigner Mariam Veiszadeh, but only to smear her reputation.” [19]

the-islamophobia-industry_60fa4

In light of the context that produced the anti-Semitic screed and graphic at the centre of the attack on Dr. Hall’s character, B’nai Brith’s failure to investigate the posting’s origins and its determination to focus instead on branding Dr. Hall an “anti-Semite” look suspicious. And given the Zionist movement’s history of duplicitous dealings, as discussed by True Torah Jews, one can understand the historical context of the research done by Dr. Hall and other scholars that shows 9/11 was an Israeli false flag operation conducted in collusion with the CIA.

5_israelis_dac78

Indeed, the Mossad agents who were arrested in New Jersey on 9/11 and later quietly returned to Israel would themselves admit on national television that they had been in New Jersey “to document the event.” [20] This statement, which makes clear that Mossad had prior knowledge of the 9/11 attack, is supported by additional research showing that Mossad agents pretending to be art students had unfettered access to the twin towers and had every means and opportunity to plant the demolition explosives that have been identified in dust samples from ground zero. [21]

Also consistent with this emerging picture of Zionism’s tactics is Mossad’s own motto: “By Deception We Shall Rule and Do War.” From a groundling like Joshua Goldberg to the state of Israel itself, one sees that deception is indeed key to the Zionist’s genocidal project against the Palestinian people and – through the Israeli-US fabricated “war on terror” – against Muslims everywhere. Those who stand against the inhumanity of Zionism should be applauded. Like Dr. Hall, they are not anti-Semites but heroes.

Notes

[1] CTV News Calgary, “Fallout of U of L Professor’s Controversial Views,” September 2016, http://calgary.ctvnews.ca/video?clipId=962755.

[2] Bernie Farber, “Facebook Removes Anti-Semitic Post after Online Blowback,” Now Magazine, 7 September 2016, https://nowtoronto.com/news/facebook-removes-anti-semitic-post-after-online-blowback/.

[3] J.W. Schnarr, “Professor Investigated by U of L,” Lethbridge Herald, 29 September 2016, http://lethbridgeherald.com/news/local-news/2016/09/29/professor-investigated-by-u-of-l/.

[4] Rafiq, “Canadian Professor Libelously Targeted as ‘Anti-Semite’ in Coordinated Attack,” American Herald Tribune, 28 September 2016, http://ahtribune.com/world/americas/1225-canadian-professor-anti-semite.html.

[5] Schnarr, “Professor Investigated,” http://lethbridgeherald.com/news/local-news/2016/09/29/professor-investigated-by-u-of-l/.

[6] CTV News Calgary, “Fallout,” http://calgary.ctvnews.ca/video?clipId=962755.

[7] B’nai Brith, “Academic Freedom Does Not Include Holocaust Denial,” 28 September 2016, http://canadafreepress.com/article/academic-freedom-does-not-include-holocaust-denial#.

[8] Tony Hall, “Israeli-Canadian Thought Police Take Aim … at Me,” 21 September 2016, American Herald Tribune, http://ahtribune.com/in-depth/1210-israeli-canadian-thought-police.html.

[9] Farber, “Facebook Removes Anti-Semitic Post,” https://nowtoronto.com/news/facebook-removes-anti-semitic-post-after-online-blowback/.

[10] “Zionism,” in The Free Dictionary by Farlex, http://www.thefreedictionary.com/Zionism.

[11] Jewish Voice for Peace, https://jewishvoiceforpeace.org/.

[12] True Torah Jews, “Nazi Propaganda Was Based on What Zionists Said,” http://www.truetorahjews.org/naziismzionism.

[13] Mark Weber, “Zionism and the Third Reich,” Journal of Historical Review 13, no. 4 (1993): 29-37, http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v13/v13n4p29_weber.html.

[14] Hall, “Israeli-Canadian Thought Police,” http://ahtribune.com/in-depth/1210-israeli-canadian-thought-police.html.

[15] Schnarr, “Professor Investigated,” http://lethbridgeherald.com/news/local-news/2016/09/29/professor-investigated-by-u-of-l/.

[16] Arthur Topham, “Ceaseless Smear Campaigns by B’nai Brith Lobby and Zionist Media Must End!” Radical Press, 28 September 2016, http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=10192.

[17] Elise Potaka and Luke McMahon, “FBI Says ‘Australian IS Jihadist’ Is Actually a Jewish American Troll Named Joshua Ryne Goldberg, Sydney Morning Herald, 12 September 2015, http://www.smh.com.au/national/australian-is-jihadist-is-actually-an-jewish-american-troll-20150911-gjk852.html.

[18] Kevin Barrett, “Rafiq on the U. of Lethbridge Witch Hunt,” Truth Jihad Radio, 2 October 2016,
http://noliesradio.org/archives/120566.

[19] Potaka and McMahon, “FBI Says,” http://www.smh.com.au/national/australian-is-jihadist-is-actually-an-jewish-american-troll-20150911-gjk852.html.

[20] Christopher Bollyn, “Five Dancing Israelis,” http://www.bollyn.com/five-dancing-israelis.

[21] Dick Eastman, “The 14 Israeli ‘Art Students’ Were inside the WTC Towers Camping with Construction Passes,” 12 October 2009, http://www.rense.com/general87/14_1.htm; Niels H. Harrit et al., “Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe,” Open Chemical Physics Journal 2, no. 1 (3 April 2009): 7–31, http://benthamopen.com/contents/pdf/TOCPJ/TOCPJ-2-7.pdf.

screen-shot-2016-10-14-at-12-18-01-am


SOURCE ARTICLE

 

Canada’s illegal witch-hunt: Arthur Topham trial continues Monday By Denis G. Rancourt

rancourtvtisraelgazaattack2014

In a shameful display of state hubris, Canada is using illegal concocted provisions of its Criminal Code to prosecute a citizen for innocuous postings on a personal blog (The Radical Press). The provisions allow a maximum 2-year prison sentence, where the state prosecutor (“Crown”) does not need to prove intent to harm or any actual harm to a single person. Intent and actual harm are not even relevant legal considerations in the proceeding. Both harm and intent are presumed.

The said Criminal Code provisions are straight out of the playbook of a totalitarian state.

The show trial was separated into two parts, despite the objections of the accused. In the first part the accused was found criminally guilty, for one blogpost, while not guilty for the other blogpost of the Crown’s charge. In the second part, which is scheduled to start tomorrow Monday October 3rd, the constitutionality of the law is being challenged on limited grounds. Any sentencing will be decided after the ruling on constitutionality.

The process of thus dividing the show trial into two parts is equivalent to first determining that the witch is guilty of blasphemy or worst, followed by a hearing to determine if burning at the stake in the town square is still within the bounds of community standards, rather than evaluating the legitimacy of the law at the same time (and before the same jury) that the nature of the “offense” is evaluated.

The process of thus dividing the show trial into two parts is equivalent to first determining that the witch is guilty of blasphemy or worst, followed by a hearing to determine if burning at the stake in the town square is still within the bounds of community standards, rather than evaluating the legitimacy of the law at the same time (and before the same jury) that the nature of the “offense” is evaluated.

Meanwhile, the “defendant” was gagged from identifying the original complainants (the usual crew) but allowed to continue blogging about the process until a conviction is finally secured, and has mounted a funding campaign for the expensive constitutional challenge.

These kinds of show-trial proceedings and the associated media assaults are attempts to create a false impression of a victimized Israel, to shield the apartheid state from international condemnation for its on-going violations of the Geneva Conventions, illegal annexation, constant violations of human rights, and mass-murder “mowing of the grass” in Gaza. Israel wants a free hand to continuously expand by the same criminal methods it has used for decades. Therefore, when successful, the domestic show trials (most prominent in Canada, France, and Germany) are geopolitical in character by virtue of Israel’s leading role in US interference in the Middle East, with Canada and France as lead accompanying sycophant states.

Canada’s Ontario Civil Liberties Association (OCLA) has defended Arthur Topham against the state’s attack on freedom of thought and expression with several interventions. OCLA applies the principle that those who’s views are most at odds with orthodoxy and who are most aggressively attacked using the state apparatus are those most in need of civil defense.

The OCLA’s 2014 on-line petition to the state authority gathered over 1,400 signatures. OCLA also, in 2015, intervened by letter against other “civil liberties” associations that adopted a statement that harmed Mr. Topham’s case.

This year, OCLA intervened prior to the constitutional part of the trial by sending a letter directly to the trial judge, with all the state actors in cc. OCLA’s letter, reproduced below, spells out the illegal character of the criminal law being used in this particular show trial and witch hunt:

January 13, 2016
The Honourable Mr. Justice Butler, Supreme Court of British Columbia

Your Honour:

Re: Unconstitutionality of s. 319(2) of the Criminal Code (R. v. Topham, Court File No. 25166, Quesnel Registry)

The Ontario Civil Liberties Association (OCLA) wishes to make this intervention, in letter form, to assist the Court in its hearing of the defendant’s constitutional challenge of s. 319(2) of the Criminal Code (“Code”), to be heard in the Supreme Court of British Columbia.
The defendant submits that s. 319(2) of the Code infringes on the s. 2(b) guarantee of freedom of expression contained in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and is not saved by s. 1 of the Charter.[1]
The Supreme Court of Canada has determined and reaffirmed that the Charter must provide at least as much protection for basic freedoms as is found in the international human rights documents adopted by Canada:[2]
“And this Court reaffirmed in Divito v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), [2013] 3 S.C.R. 157, at para. 23, “the Charter should be presumed to provide at least as great a level of protection as is found in the international human rights documents that Canada has ratified”.”[Emphasis added.]
Canada has ratified the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (“Covenant”). Article 19, para. 2 of the Covenant protects freedom of expression:[3]
“2. Everyone shall have the right to freedom of expression; this right shall include freedom to seek, receive and impart information and ideas of all kinds, regardless of frontiers, either orally, in writing or in print, in the form of art, or through any other media of his choice.”
Further, the U.N. Human Rights Committee, in its General Comment dated 12 September 2011, has specified that any restrictions[4] to the protection of freedom of expression “must conform to the strict tests of necessity and proportionality”:[5]
“35. When a State party invokes a legitimate ground for restriction of freedom of expression, it must demonstrate in specific and individualized fashion the precise nature of the threat, and the necessity and proportionality of the specific action taken, in particular by establishing a direct and immediate connection between the expression and the threat.” [Emphasis added.][6]
The impugned provision in the Code does not require the Crown to prove any actual harm, and no evidence of actual harm to any individual or group was presented in the trial of R. v. Topham. There is no “direct and immediate connection” between Mr. Topham’s expression on his blog and any threat that would permit restriction of his expression.
The OCLA submits that the current jurisprudence of the Covenant, including the 2011 General Comment No. 34, represents both Canada’s obligation and the current status of reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society, in relation to state-enforced limits on expression. The process and the jury-conviction to date in the instant case establish that s. 319(2) of the Code exceeds these limits, and is therefore not constitutional.
Furthermore, s. 319(2) of the Code allows a maximum punishment of “imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years”. The Code punishment of imprisonment exceeds the “strict tests of necessity and proportionality” prescribed by the Covenant.
In addition, in paragraph 47 of General Comment No. 34, it is specified that: “States parties should consider the decriminalization of defamation and, in any case, the application of the criminal law should only be countenanced in the most serious of cases and imprisonment is never an appropriate penalty.” [Emphasis added.] In the penal defamation envisaged in the Covenant, unlike in s. 319(2) in the Code, the state has an onus to prove actual harm.
And in relation to state concerns or prohibitions about so-called “Holocaust denial”, paragraph 49 of the said General Comment has:
“Laws that penalize the expression of opinions about historical facts are incompatible with the obligations that the Covenant imposes on States parties in relation to the respect for freedom of opinion and expression.”
Finally, the OCLA submits that the feature of s. 319(2) that gives the Attorney General direct say regarding proceeding to prosecution (the requirement for the Attorney General’s “consent”)[7] is unconstitutional because it is contrary to the fundamental principle of the rule of law, wherein provisions in a statute cannot be subject to arbitrary application or be politically motivated or appear as such. The fundamental principle of the rule of law underlies the constitution.[8]
For these reasons, the OCLA is of the opinion that s. 319(2) of Canada’s Criminal Code is unconstitutional and incompatible with the values of a free and democratic society.
If the Court requests it, the OCLA will be pleased to make itself available to provide any further assistance in relation to the instant submission.
Yours sincerely,

Joseph Hickey
Executive Director
Ontario Civil Liberties Association (OCLA)

[1] Defendant’s “Memorandum of Argument Regarding Charter Issues”, R. v. Topham, Court File No. 25166, Quesnel Registry.
[2] Saskatchewan Federation of Labour v. Saskatchewan [2015 SCC 4], at para. 64.
[3] International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Article 19, at para. 2.
[4] Ibid., Article 19, at para. 3, and Article 20.
[5] General Comment No. 34, UN Human Rights Committee [CCPR/C/GC/34], at para. 22.
[6] Ibid., at para. 35.
[7] Criminal Code (R.S.C., 1985, c. C-46), s. 319(6).
[8] For a recent example where unconstitutionality arising from the rule of law was the main issue before the court, see: Trial Lawyers Association of British Columbia v. British Columbia (Attorney General), 2014 SCC 59 (CanLII); and see Committee for the Commonwealth of Canada v. Canada, [1991] 1 SCR 139, 1991 CanLII 119 (SCC), p. 210 (i).


SOURCE ARTICLE

Les lois sur la propagande haineuse doivent être détruites by Ray Y. Adamson

screen-shot-2016-09-19-at-9-38-33-pm

http://www.lebonnetdespatriotes.net/lbdp/index.php/dossierslbdp/item/8018-les-lois-sur-la-propagande-haineuse-doivent-etre-detruites

Les lois sur la propagande haineuse doivent être détruites 

c119827c4b997d3713e1222e73d94218_xl

lundi, 19 septembre 2016

Ray Y. Adamson

Que penser d’un tract politique faisant appel à l’extermination d’un peuple entier et à la destruction totale de leur pays? Terrible – inadmissible – me diriez-vous. Peut-être même qu’un tel livre, s’il existe, devrait être banni… car on ne peut pas tolérer la Haine.

Cependant il existe! Publié aux États-Unis durant la guerre, mais en 1941 quand l’union américaine était toujours neutre, ce livre de propagande haineuse est toujours disponible au Canada. Intitulé « Germany Must Perish » ou en français : « l’Allemagne doit être détruite » le pamphlet est écrit par un juif du nom de Theodore Kaufman. À l’époque, il a attisé la haine contre les Allemands, ce sentiment étant nécessaire pour que les politiciens américains acceptent de participer à la Deuxième guerre mondiale.

De retour aux temps modernes – en 2011 un intellectuel dissident canadien nommé Arthur Topham a voulu utiliser à son tour sa liberté d’expression, le premier droit protégé par la Charte canadienne des droits et libertés. Monsieur Topham  a republié Germany Must Perish!. C’est légal. En parallèle il a publié un second livre identique en tous points sauf pour les changements suivants : à chaque fois qu’il trouvait le mot Allemagne dans le texte originel, il le remplaçait par Israël. À chaque fois qu’il voyait Nazi, il écrivait Sioniste et à chaque fois qu’il trouvait le mot Allemand il le remplaçait par Juif. Le titre du livre L’Allemagne doit être détruite! devenait donc Israël doit être détruite!. Les deux livres étaient publiés ensemble avec une préface expliquant le procédé de Topham et précisant ses motivations. Il y avait donc mise en garde et encadrement.*

La communauté juive organisée, soit l’organisme de pression B’nai Brith Canada, n’a pas apprécié. Elle a fait ce qu’elle fait de mieux : dénoncer. Le travail satirique a valu à Arthur Topham des accusations de crime haineux et il s’est rapidement retrouvé face à la justice. Un verdict de culpabilité a été rendu à la fin d’un procès en novembre 2015.** C’est une chose merveilleuse!

Merveilleuse en effet car pour ceux qui chérissent réellement la liberté d’expression ce verdict est la clé qui ouvre la porte à la cause judiciaire la plus importante des temps modernes au Canada : il s’agit de la contestation de la légitimité constitutionnelle des lois sur la « propagande haineuse », en particulier la section 319(2) du Code criminel canadien.***

Cette loi est une menace pour la liberté de tous les Canadiens car nul n’est à l’abri d’une interprétation vicieuse du Code criminel si une parodie visant à critiquer un texte haineux est elle-même considérée comme propagande haineuse. La clause de la Loi intitulée « Fomenter volontairement la haine » devrait donc être revue ou biffée.

Tout citoyen ayant à cœur la valeur occidentale la plus importante, soit la liberté de penser, d’être en désaccord, de débattre et de s’exprimer publiquement devrait soutenir Arthur Topham dans son appel à la Cour suprême de Quesnel en Colombie Britannique, dans l’ouest canadien. Le procès de contestation constitutionnelle des lois sur la propagande haineuse aura lieu du 3 au 7 octobre 2016. Pour contribuer au succès de cette cause qui nous affecte tous en ces temps de rectitude politique et judiciarisation croissante, veuillez diffuser cet article dans vos réseaux et surtout veuillez contribuer financièrement ici : http://gogetfunding.com/project/canadian-publisher-faces-jail-for-political-writings/.

Arthur Topham est un des rares hommes droits au pays qui se bat réellement pour la justice et la vérité. Dans ces temps d’extrême violence, il le fait pacifiquement et avec humour. Soutenons-le!

* Les deux textes en questions peuvent être consultés à http://www.radicalpress.com/

** http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/topham-anti-semitism-jewish-hatred-1.3317052

*** « Quiconque, par la communication de déclarations autrement que dans une conversation privée, fomente volontairement la haine contre un groupe identifiable est coupable : a) soit d’un acte criminel et passible d’un emprisonnement maximal de deux ans; b) soit d’une infraction punissable sur déclaration de culpabilité par procédure sommaire. »

Crédit image : Ray Y. Adamson. Ivstitia Canadianna est une imitation burlesque de la statue très respectable Ivstitia (Justice) que l’on retrouve à la Cour suprême du Canada.

Enough Already! HolocaustDeprogrammingCourse.com

EnjoughAlready!

HolocaustDeprogrammingCourse.com

Holocaust deprogramming course

Do you care to know about how the people you have trusted all your lives have lied to you?

If anything were to ever convince you of the terrible Jewish lies about World War II, this would be that document. You can’t possibly read this compilation of sources by hundreds of serious minded examiners and still believe the lies that mainstream accounts have forced upon you as “the truth” of World War II.

Many thanks to my friend “pdk” in France.
Please read as much as your mind can tolerate. You will never find as many courageous truth tellers represented in one place.
Best wishes,
John Kaminski

Regina v Radical Press Legal Update #25

NEWERESTLegalUpdateLogo-700

Regina v Radical Press Legal Update # 25
 July 11th, 2016

RPEdNew400-copy-3 copy 2

Dear Free Speech Defenders and Radical Press Supporters,

It’s been close to a year since I last posted a Legal Update back on August 8th, 2015. That was prior to the actual trial which began on October 26th, 2015 and concluded fourteen days later on November 12th, 2015.

The outcome of the trial, as many will know, resulted in a Guilty charge on Count 1 and a Not Guilty charge on Count 2. What was perplexing for everyone who heard the results (including myself) was that BOTH Counts 1 and 2  were the same charge, that is, both were a Sec. 319(2) Criminal Code of Canada offence which reads:

“(2) Every one who, by communicating statements, other than in private conversation, wilfully promotes hatred against any identifiable group is guilty of

(a) an indictable offence and is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years; or

(b) an offence punishable on summary conviction.”

Immediately following the trial a date was set for December 7th, 2015 in order to fix a date for the Charter application hearing to be heard. The Charter issue had already began back in the spring of 2015 but was postponed pending the outcome of the trial. Had I been victorious and found Not Guilty on both counts there would not have been grounds to file the challenge to the legislation. That date came and went and Crown and Defence were unable to agree upon a date for the hearing. It was put over to January 25th, 2016. On the January date issues came up about Defence calling Expert Witnesses and so it was rescheduled to March 29th, 2016 to fix a date. March 29th came and went and more delays required the setting a new date of April 4th. The 4th of April came and went and another date of May 2nd was chosen. On May 2nd the computers in the courtroom malfunctioned causing further delays and a new date of June 6th was set. On June 6th Defence counsel’s computer went down and a new date of July 11th, 2016 was set. After  eight months and seven attempts to fix a date the deed was finally accomplished on the 11th of July!

As it now stands the Charter application will be heard in Quesnel Supreme Court beginning October 3rd, 2016 and run (possibly) for the full week to October 7th, 2016.

As stated previously, I, as the Applicant will be raising the following issues; ones that are included in my Memorandum of Argument:

• Section 319(2) of the Criminal Code constitutes an infringement of Section 2(b) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

• The Crown bears the onus of justifying the infringement of Charter rights on a case-by-case basis.

• The present case is distinguishable from Keegstra on its facts.

• The infringement of Section 2(b) of the Charter is not reasonably justified by Section 1 in the circumstances of this case, and specifically: The “pressing and substantial objective” of legislation must be defined narrowly for the purpose of a Section 1 analysis.

• The use of Section 319(2) in this case is not rationally connected to the pressing and substantial objective of preventing harms associated with hate propaganda.

• Criminal prosecution by indictment is not a minimal impairment of the Applicant’s Charter rights.

• The infringement of the Applicant’s Charter rights is disproportionate to any possible salutary effect that Section 319(2) could have in the circumstances of this case.

• The appropriate remedy is to read into the law a constitutional exemption, to the effect that Section 319(2) is not a reasonable limit on Section 2(b) in circumstances where the allegedly hateful material is legal to possess and lawfully available from other sources.

The bottom line is that Section 319(2) of the Criminal Code constitutes an infringement of Section 2(b) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms which states:

“Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms: …

(b) freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication …”

The Order that I intend to pursue is based upon Section 52(1) of the Constitution Act1982 reads as follows:

“52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is inconsistent with the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of no force or effect.”

Citing R. v. Sharpe in support of Section 52(1) I will be respectfully requesting an order that would read as follows:

A declaration that Section 319(2) of the Criminal Code constitutes an infringement of Section 2(b) of the Charter, as already established in R. v. Keegstra.

A declaration, pursuant to Section 52(1) of the Constitution Act, 1982, that Section 319(2) of the Criminal Code is not reasonably justified by Section 1 of the Charter in circumstances where the allegedly hateful material is legal to possess and lawfully available from other sources.

Crown of course will be arguing that the applicant’s (my) argument is entirely without merit.

Now that the date has been set there is still the responsibility on my part to cover a number of financial costs related to the hiring of Expert Witnesses and also travel expenses and accommodations for legal assistants who I will be bringing to Quesnel for the week of the Charter hearing. These and many other miscellaneous costs that are part of this ongoing process must be raised over the next two months in order accomplish our goals. Any help that people can offer will be gratefully accepted and put to good use.

Donations can be made online via my GoGetFunding site located at http://gogetfunding.com/canadian-publisher-faces-jail-for-political-writings/ or else by sending cash, cheques or Money Orders to the following postal address. Please make sure that any cheques or Money Orders are made out to – Arthur Topham – and sent to:

Arthur Topham
4633 Barkerville Highway
Quesnel, B.C.
V2J 6T8
Thank You All for your ongoing help throughout this long process!

The Jew World Order – Can it be fixed? a RadicalPress.com Poster

BobCanYouFixIt??? copy

THE TRIAL: REGINA V ROY ARTHUR TOPHAM

TheTrialHEADERFINAL copy

ATEditorPic185 copy

Editor’s Note: With the exception of the final Charge to the Jury by B.C.S.C. Justice Butler the full transcript of the trial proceedings in the case of R V ROY ARTHUR TOPHAM from October 26, 2015 to November 12, 2015 are contained in the following pdf files.
It is suggested that these files be downloaded for future reference and in the interest of securing a permanent record of this important free speech trial in Canada.
Sincerely,

Arthur Topham
Pub/Ed
The Radical Press
Canada’s Radical News Network
“Digging to the root of the issues since 1998”

_________________________________

PROCEEDINGS AT TRIAL (Excerpt – Opening Remarks by Court and Crown and Testimony of Terry Wilson) (DAY 1)

DAY2-173249.Oct 27 15.Trial.Electronic copy 2

DAY3-173249.Oct 28 15.Trial.Electronic copy 2

DAY4-173249.Oct 29 15.Trial.Electronic copy 2

DAY-5173249.Oct 30 15.Trial.Electronic copy 2

DAY-6173249.Nov 2 15.Trial.Electronic copy 2

DAY7173249.Nov 3 15.Trial.Electronic copy 2

DAY8-173249.Nov 4 15.Trial.Electronic copy 2

DAY9-173249.Nov 5 15.Trial.Electronic copy 2

D10-173249.Nov 6 15.Trial.Electronic copy 2

DII-173249.Nov 9 15.Trial.Electronic copy 2

D12-173249.Nov 10 15.Trial.Excerpt.Electronic copy 2

D13-173249.Nov 11 15.Trial.Electronic copy 2

D14-173249.Nov 12 15.Trial.Electronic copy 2

OCLA Intervenes in R v. Topham Constitutional Challenge to Sec. 319(2) of Criminal Code of Canada

RPEdNew400-copy-3

Editor’s Note: It’s with a continuing sense of gratification and appreciation that I post the following letter by the Ontario Civil Liberties Association (OCLA) sent out today, January 13th, 2016 in support of my Constitutional challenge to Sec. 319(2) of Canada’s Criminal Code

The OCLA has been the only civil liberties association at the forefront in Canada in their determined efforts to bring a sense of clarity, fairness, honesty and responsibility to the nation’s legal jurisprudence insofar as it applies to Charter issues and in particular the fundamental issue of freedom of expression as guaranteed under Sec. 2b of said Charter.

All their efforts toward ridding this nation of these draconian, anti-democratic “hate crime” laws that only serve vested interests and serve to silence the vast majority of decent, thoughtful citizens are extremely important and should be supported. 
 
There are very strong arguments for defeating this legislation and I would hope to see similar actions by the Canadian Civil Liberties Association and the British Columbia Civil Liberties Association and every other civil minded organization in Canada that has the nation’s best interests at heart. Now that we have a new and more liberal government in power the opportunity is there for our leaders to do what the previous governments never had the integrity to do – given the people their voice back!

Please try to share this post with as many others as you can.

Sincerely,

Arthur Topham
Pub/Ed
The Radical Press
Canada’s Radical News Network
“Digging to the root of the issues since 1998”
––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

Screen Shot 2016-01-13 at 1.08.46 PM

Screen Shot 2016-01-13 at 1.20.02 PM

January 13, 2016                                                                                                    By Mail and Fax

The Honourable Mr. Justice Butler
Supreme Court of British Columbia

Your Honour:

Re: Unconstitutionality of s. 319(2) of the Criminal Code (R. v. Topham, Court File No. 25166, Quesnel Registry)

The Ontario Civil Liberties Association (OCLA) wishes to make this intervention, in letter form, to assist the Court in its hearing of the defendant’s constitutional challenge of s. 319(2) of the Criminal Code (“Code”), to be heard in the Supreme Court of British Columbia.

The defendant submits that s. 319(2) of the Code infringes on the s. 2(b) guarantee of freedom of expression contained in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedom, and is not saved by s. 1 of the Charter. [1]

The Supreme Court of Canada has determined and reaffirmed that the Charter must provide at least as much protection for basic freedoms as is found in the international human rights documents adopted by Canada: [2]

And this Court reaffirmed in Divito v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), [2013] 3 S.C.R. 157, at para. 23, “the Charter should be presumed to provide at least as great a level of protection as is found in the international human rights documents that Canada has ratified”. [Emphasis added].

Canada has ratified the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (“Covenant”). Article 19, para. 2 of the Covenant protects freedom of expression: [3]

2. Everyone shall have the right to freedom of expression; this right shall include freedom to seek, receive and impart information and ideas of all kinds, regardless of frontiers, either orally, in writing or in print, in the form of art, or through any other media of his choice.

–––––––––––––––––––
[1]  Defendant’s “Memorandum of Argument Regarding Charter Issues”, R. v. Topham, Court File No. 25166, Quesnel Registry.
[2]  Saskatchewan Federation of Labour v. Saskatchewan [2015 SCC 4], at para. 64.
[3]  International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Article 19, at para. 2.

 

2/

Further, the U.N. Human Rights Committee, in its General Comment dated 12 September 2011, has specified that any restrictions[4] to the protection of freedom of expression “must conform to the strict tests of necessity and proportionality”: [5]

35. When a State party invokes a legitimate ground for restriction of freedom of expression, it must demonstrate in specific and individualized fashion the precise nature of the threat, and the necessity and proportionality of the specific action taken, in particular by establishing a direct and immediate connection between the expression and the threat. [Emphasis added.] [6]

The impugned provision in the Code does not require the Crown to prove any actual harm, and no evidence of actual harm to any individual or group was presented in the trial of R. v. Topham. There is no “direct and immediate connection” between Mr. Topham’s expression on his blog and any threat that would permit restriction of his expression.

The OCLA submits that the current jurisprudence of the Covenant, including the 2011 General Comment No. 34, represents both Canada’s obligation and the current status of reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society, in relation to state-enforced limits on expression. The process and the jury-conviction to date in the instant case establish that s. 319(2) of the Code exceeds these limits, and is therefore not constitutional.

Furthermore, s. 319(2) of the Code allows a maximum punishment of “imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years”. The Code punishment of imprisonment exceeds the “strict tests of necessity and proportionality” prescribed by the Covenant.

In addition, in paragraph 47 of General Comment No. 34, it is specified that: “States parties should consider the decriminalization of defamation and, in any case, the application of the criminal law should only be countenanced in the most serious of cases and imprisonment is never an appropriate penalty.” [Emphasis added.] In the penal defamation envisaged in the Covenant, unlike in s. 319(2) in the Code, the state has an onus to prove actual harm.

And in relation to state concerns or prohibitions about so-called “Holocaust denial”, paragraph 49 of the said General Comment has:

Laws that penalize the expression of opinions about historical facts are incompatible with the obligations that the Covenant imposes on States parties in relation to the respect for freedom of opinion and expression.

Finally, the OCLA submits that the feature of s. 31 9(2) that gives the Attorney General direct say regarding proceeding to prosecution (the requirement for the Attorney General’s “consent”) [7] is unconstitutional because it is contrary to the fundamental principle of the rule of law, wherein

––––––––––––––––––––
[4]  Ibid., Article 19, at para. 3, and Article 20.
[5]  General Comment No. 34, UN Human Rights Committee [CCPR/C/GC/34], at para. 22.
[6]  Ibid., at para. 35.
[7]  Criminal Code (R.S.C., 1985, c. C-46), s. 319(6).

3/

provisions in a statute cannot be subject to arbitrary application or be politically motivated or appear as such. The fundamental principle of the rule of law underlies the constitution. [8]

For these reasons, the OCLA is of the opinion that s. 319(2) of Canada’s Criminal Code is unconstitutional and incompatible with the values of a free and democratic society.

lf the Court requests it, the OCLA will be pleased to make itself available to provide any further assistance in relation to the instant submission.

 

Yours sincerely,

Screen Shot 2016-01-13 at 3.54.11 PM
Joseph Hickey
Executive Director
Ontario Civil Liberties Association (OCLA) http://ocla.ca
613-252-6148 (c)
joseph.hickey@ocla.ca

To:

The Honourable Mr. Justice Butler
Judge’s Chambers
Supreme Court of British Columbia
800 Smithe Street
Vancouver, BC
V6Z 2E1
Fax: 604-660-2418

And copy to:

The Honourable Mr. Justice Butler
Judge’s Chambers
Supreme Court of British Columbia
305-350 Barlow Avenue
Quesnel, BC
V2J 2C1
Fax: 250-992-4171
––––––––––––––––––

8  For a recent example where unconstitutionality arising from the rule of law was the main issue before the court, see: Trial Lawyers Association of British Columbia v. British Columbia (Attorney General), 2014 SCC 59 (CanLll); and see Committee for the Commonwealth of Canada v. Canada, [1991] 1 SCR 139, 1991 CanLll 119 (SCC), p. 210 (i).

 

4/

And to:

Barclay W. Johnson
Barrister, Solicitor & Notary
Counsel for the Defendant
1027 Pandora Avenue,
Victoria, BC
Fax: 250-413-3110

Rodney G. Garson
Prosecution Support Unit
Crown Law Division
Ministry of Justice
3rd Floor – 940 Blanshard Street
Victoria, BC
Fax: 250-387-4262

The Honourable Suzanne Anton
Attorney General of BC
JAG.Minister@gov.bc.ca
suzanne.anton.MLA@leg.bc.ca

The Honourable Jody Wilson-Raybould
Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada
mcu@justice.gc.ca
Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca

——–

VIEW SOURCE PDF HERE: 2016-01-13-Letter-OCLA-re-R-v-Topham

MUSLIMS (AND CHRISTIANS) THE BAD GUYS? a Radical Press Public Service Announcement

KeepYerEyeontheBall!BLUE copy

Editor’s Note: Let’s not delude ourselves about who the real enemy of humanity is. Those who fall for the lies of the Zionist media campaign against the Muslims (as well as the Christians) are being hoodwinked into aiding and abetting the Jewish agenda of divide and conquer of nations for the benefit of their NWO program. Stay focused on the ultimate designers of deception – Israel and World Jewry headed by the Rothschild criminal cartel.

Happy New Year! from RadicalPress.com

HappyNewYeark! copy

Merry Christmas and a Happy, Hopeful New Year from RadicalPress.com

MerryChristmasA&STopham

ATEditorPic185

Dear Radical Readers and Friends of Freedom of Speech Everywhere,

On behalf of my wife Shastah and myself I would like to thank everyone who has been standing with RadicalPress.com over the past year and longer in my ongoing struggle to defend the legal right of all Canadians, as stated in the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, to be able to express their thoughts and viewpoints on the Internet and in other media without fear of being attacked and persecuted by the government of Canada via the use of Sec. 319(2) of the Criminal Code.

This past year saw the case move to the actual stage of trial which commenced in the B.C. Supreme Court, Quesnel, Canada on October 26, 2015 and ran until November 12, 2015 when the jury of 8 women and 4 men found me guilty in Count 1 and not guilty in Count 2 of the identical charge that I did “willfully promote hatred against an identifiable group, people of the Jewish religion or ethnic origin, contrary to Section 319(2) of the Criminal Code.”

As a result of this peculiar and strange ruling the stage has been now set for the continuation of my Charter challenge to Sec. 319(2) in the coming new year. The time when this challenge will occur is yet to be determined but the week beginning January 25, 2016 will see a date fixed for the Constitutional argument to be heard.

In the event that my Charter argument fails to convince the Supreme Court that Sec. 319(2) is in violation of Sec. 2b of Canada’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms then I will then have the right to appeal the decision of the court on Count 1 that was handed down November 12, 2015.

There were a number of extenuating circumstances that arose during the actual trial which will, of necessity, come to the forefront in the appeal and portend a strong case for having the decision tossed out and a not guilty decision rendered. Space here doesn’t allow for any elaboration on the process but the new evidence will be forthcoming in the new year.

As of today I am still raising money in order to purchase the transcripts from the trial. Not only does the legal process in this country unfairly work against the individual through unjust legislation such as Sec. 319(2) of the criminal code but when forced to defend oneself against such specious forms of “thought crime” laws the costs incurred are then further exacerbated by the state in the form of  the victim having to pay exorbitant costs for the transcripts of the proceedings in order to continue on with their defence.

As  it now stands the transcripts will cost me $7,500.00 to purchase from the sole contractor to the Attorney General’s office in B.C. JCWord Assist Ltd. The amount of support and funding for this onerous and ridiculously unfair process of procuring the transcripts has been overwhelmingly positive and to date we have already raised over $7,000.00 toward this end. I am deeply appreciative and humbled by this generosity on the part of supporters world-wide who’ve found it in their hearts to help me out. The transcripts are vital to my defence and will prove extremely useful in the days ahead as this battle to retain our right to freedom of speech continues to unfold in the Supreme Court of Canada.

The transcripts though are not the only expenses that I face and therefore I am forced to continue to ask for financial assistance and will likely do so until the process wends its way to a final outcome. It’s for this reason that I must therefore append my donation “shingle” to this Christmas greeting as well.

As the new year approaches I am filled with hope, strength and an unwavering determination to carry on with this fight until the odious sections of our legal system that make it a criminal act to speak one’s mind are defeated and repealed once and for all.

The world today stands at the brink of despair and hope. Never has there been a more urgent time in our history for the people to be able to stand up and speak out for their basic human rights in order to defend their nation against the incredibly powerful and deceptive actions of their respective governments and media; political bodies and complicit agencies who have shown themselves, over and over, to be working against the fundamental rights of the individual in order to broaden the scope of their control and propaganda now being forced upon the minds and hearts of people around the globe all at the behest of special interest groups who wield, altogether, untold amounts of unwarranted power and influence over nation states worldwide.

2016 bodes well in terms of providing the impetus to speak out and be heard. Let us pray that vigilance and discernment will be the watchwords in the days ahead and that we will retain our basic rights and continue to live freely and in peace and harmony with all of humanity.

May God bless the peacemakers and all who strive for justice and truth!

Sincerely,

Arthur Topham
Pub/Ed
The Radical Press
Canada’s Radical News Network
“Digging to the root of the issues since 1998”
––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

Donations can be made online via my GoGetFunding site located at http://gogetfunding.com/canadian-publisher-faces-jail-for-political-writings/ or else by sending cash, cheques or Money Orders to the following postal address. Please make sure that any cheques or Money Orders are made out to – Arthur Topham – and sent to:

Arthur Topham
4633 Barkerville Highway
Quesnel, B.C.
V2J 6T8

THANK YOU!

RadicalPress.com “Digging to the root of the issues since 1998

RPDigging2theRoot

SPECIAL NOTICE TO ALL RADICALPRESS.COM SUPPORTERS

Special NoticeThankYou

Anti-Zionist Jew web postings about ‘synagogue of Satan’ at heart of Arthur Topham’s trial by Betsy Trumpener/CBC

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/hate-jew-topham-quesnel-website-crime-israel-synagogues-of-satan-1.3309060

Anti-Zionist Jew web postings about ‘synagogue of Satan’ at heart of Arthur Topham’s trial

Topham trial ‘the biggest waste of taxpayer money’ says his lawyer

CBC News Posted: Nov 07, 2015 9:19 AM PT Last Updated: Nov 08, 2015

CBCAT&ST

Arthur Topham and his wife Shastah Topham leave the Quesnel courthouse Friday Nov. 6. (Betsy Trumpener/CBC)

Betsy Trumpener

Arthur Topham’s views on Judaism are far from “mainstream,” but his lawyer says his website is far from criminal.

The Quesnel man’s lawyer said Friday his client is the victim of an “inquisition” for espousing controversial views on a politically sensitive topic.

Topham is charged with willfully promoting hatred against Jewish people through his website RadicalPress.com.

An expert Crown witness said Friday that Topham’s postings demonized and distorted Jewish people with phrases like “synagogues of Satan” and a satiric article calling for “the extermination of Israel and all Jews.”

Lawyer Barclay Johnson conceded that that his client’s views deviated from “the mainstream” but pointed to the fact that Topham did not hate individual Jews, and in fact, his own wife is Jewish.

In closing arguments Johnson said B’nai Brith and the former Canadian Jewish Congress alerted authorities about Topham’s website, describing them as “lobby groups for a foreign government trying to shut down a Canadian web site for criticism of Israel and Jews.”

Johnson then called the trial “the ultimate insult to freedom, and the biggest waste of taxpayer money.”

The crown is scheduled to deliver its own closing arguments Monday, Nov. 9.

—-

Report on first week of Supreme Court Trial R v Roy Arthur Topham by Arthur Topham

Screen Shot 2015-11-01 at 12.18.21 PM

ATEditorPic185

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[EDITOR’S NOTE: Please feel free to use whatever information is contained in this Report in order to spread the word further afield. Now that the first week of the trial has ended and there’s been no mention of it in Canada’s mainstream media, other than the local Quesnel Cariboo Observer, I believe it’s fair to assume that the mainstream news outlets in this country have collectively decided to censor the case in order that the Canadian public remains unaware of the importance of what’s occurring in British Columbia.

Given the importance of this trial to every citizen of the nation who values their constitutional right to freedom of expression and also considering the wide-spread media coverage over the years leading up to the final repeal of the Sec. 13(1) legislation as contained in the Canadian Human Rights Act in June of 2012, it’s highly unlikely that the msm is unaware of the fact that this trial is happening.

It’s therefore up to the alternative news media to do its best to cover this important historic event in Canadian jurisprudence and bring it to the attention of internet readers.

Because of the nature of the case and for obvious reasons of strategy I’ve kept the details of the proceedings to a bare minimum. Rest assured though that at the trial’s end which could be at the end of the coming week (November 6th) a more thorough analysis of the trial will be forthcoming.

Thank you.]

——–

 

To Alternative Media Sources 

Report on first week of 

Supreme Court Trial R v Roy Arthur Topham 

 by 

Arthur Topham

The Supreme Court “Hate Speech” trial of Arthur Topham and his website RadicalPress.com concluded its first week of deliberations on Friday, October 30th, 2015 in the small, central interior city of Quesnel, British Columbia.

Having elected to be tried by a jury of his peers rather than gamble on the Attorney General’s office selecting a potentially biased justice to oversee the proceedings and decide his fate the first order of business was to select twelve individuals from around the local community to sit on the jury. This process of selection meant that well over a hundred individuals were called to appear at the provincial government office on the morning of Monday, October 26th.

As well, and contrary to its normal behaviour over the past three and a half years, it was also at this time that Crown decided to initiate a rather Orwellian practise of setting up a RCMP screening process within the building which required every individual entering to have to go through a security check prior to gaining access to the courts. This entailed the removal of all of one’s personal possessions such as wallets, purses, cell phones, etc from their pockets and placing them in little plastic baskets and then walking through a scanner and having an RCMP officer go over your whole body with a hand-held wand to determine whether you might have a concealed weapon or possibly explosives(?) strapped to your body with the intent of committing an act of “terrorism”. Given the undue inconvenience of this intimidating process one can only imagine that it may have been designed by Crown to discourage the local citizenry from attending the trial and observing its proceedings.

Len Rudner copy

In addition, considering the fact that Crown’s star Expert witness was Len Rudner, former Director of the Canadian Jewish Congress (CJC), it was highly likely that the additional security measures were part of the conditions upon which Mr. Rudner consented to appear. This was further corroborated by the fact that while Mr. Rudner was in attendance he was constantly accompanied by a police bodyguard.

Meanwhile the crowd of potential jurors were forced to line up outside and wait in the snow and sleet as each one of them went through the onerous security process.

The Show Begins

Crown’s first witness was now retired Det. Cst. Terry Wilson who, at the time of my arrest and incarceration on May 16th, 2012, was the lead investigator for the BC Hate Crime Unit located in Surrey, B.C., a suburb of Vancouver. Wilson, along with his partner Cst. Normandie Levas and a team of other police officers, had, after investigating complaints from two individuals back in 2011 that I and my website RadicalPress.com were contravening Sec. 319(2) of the Criminal Code of Canada by “communicating statements, other than in private conversation, willfully promote hatred against an identifiable group, people of the Jewish religion or ethnic origin” decided to charge and arrest me for the promotion of “hate propaganda”.

Wilson&LevasPhoto copy 4

The focus of Crown’s evidence consisted of four large binders of which Binder #1 and #2 composed the complete texts of the following online books which are posted on RadicalPress.com:

1. Germany Must Perish! by Theodore N. Kaufmann

2. Israel Must Perish! (erroneously labeled by Wilson and Crown as a “book” rather than a satirical article)

3. The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion

4. The Biological Jew by Eustice Mullins

5. The Jewish Religion: Its Influence Today by Elizabeth Dilling

Binder #2 was the complete text of Douglas Reed’s masterful historic analysis of political Zionism The Controversy of Zion.

The remaining two binders contained numerous posts and Editorial comments by Topham. The majority of material being that produced by authors other than the accused.

It wasn’t until the end of Wednesday, October 28th that Crown completed her testimony from former Det. Cst. Terry Wilson. The following morning, Thursday, October 29th at 10:26 a.m. Arthur Topham’s Defence Counsel, Barclay Johnson had the opportunity to cross-examine Wilson on his three day of testimony.

Court adjourned at 4:05 p.m. and Mr. Topham, his Attorney Barclay Johnson and a number of supporters, including Mr. Topham’s wife proceeded across the street from the Courthouse to the Billy Barker Hotel where all of the out-of-town visitors were staying to await the arrival of Topham’s Expert Witness Mr. Gilad Atzmon, who was due to arrive at the Quesnel airport at 4:00 p.m. that same day.

TophamLegalTeam

Mr. Atzmon is an Israeli-born writer, musician, and political commentator who has written extensively about global politics, and specifically the geopolitical role of the State of Israel. Atzmon is critical of the Israeli government and its approach to other countries in the Middle East. He moved to England in 1994 and became a British citizen in 2002.

AtzBkCov

Day five of the trial began Friday, October 30th, 2015. Crown’s Expert Witness Mr. Len Rudner testified throughout the whole of the day. Cross examination of Mr. Rudner will begin Monday, November 2nd.

•••0•••

Please help out with my upcoming Sec. 319(2) “Hate Propaganda” trial that commences in one week on October 26th by making a donation.

Donations can be made online via my GoGetFunding site located at http://gogetfunding.com/canadian-publisher-faces-jail-for-political-writings/ or else by sending cash, cheques or Money Orders to the following postal address.

Please make sure that any cheques or Money Orders are made out to – Arthur Topham – and sent to:

Arthur Topham
4633 Barkerville Highway
Quesnel, B.C.
V2J 6T8

FREE IRA ZBARSKY plus DETENTION IN TEXAS: IRA ZBARSKY’S STORY from the Feb. 2000 edition of The Radical

Screen Shot 2015-10-21 at 7.22.57 PM copy

 FREE IRA ZBARSKI 

The Radical  Vol. 2, No. 8  February, 2000

Innocent Canadian Citizen Held in Texas Prison

RPEdNew300 copy

[Editor’s Preface to the two following articles. One might call these articles on Ira Zbarsky oldies but goodies but my purpose in re-publishing them 15 years later is not merely out of nostalgia.

Ever since 2007 when the foreign Zionist Jewish lobby group B’nai Brith ‘Canada’ registered their first “Hate Crime” complaint against myself and my website RadicalPress.com they have been accusing me of using my website to promote “ongoing hatred affecting persons identifiable as Jews and/or citizens of Israel.” Their rallying cry of “Hate! Hate! Hate!” has been ringing in my ears and the ears of millions of free thinking people around the world for decades now along with their other emotive, sorcery-style buzz words “anti-Semite” and “holocaust denier”, all of which are designed to create, via endless repetition, unconscious feelings of guilt and fear in their Gentile victims.

This will be their theme song as my long awaited Sec. 319(2) “Hate Propaganda” trial, scheduled to commence within the next week on October 26th finally commences in Quesnel, British Columbia. One can bet on it that if the Zionist dominated Jewish media monopoly now controlling all the major sources of news and information and opinion here in Canada decide to focus on this supreme court trial that we will be hearing the voices of “hate of the Jews” rising up once again across the land.

Well, I’m sorry to have to disappoint these false prophets and purveyors of lies but Arthur Topham and his website RadicalPress.com (the online version of the sole proprietorship known as The Radical Press) are not “haters” of Jews but rather, lovers of Truth and firm believers in their fundamental, constitutionally guaranteed right to be able to express their opinions and ideas and beliefs without fear of being hauled into a courtroom because some foreign lobby organization representing a racist, supremacist apartheid foreign nation thousands of miles from Canada’s shore feels it’s their right and duty to libel, vilify, harass and criminally charge anyone who might have the honesty and courage to speak out online against that foreign nation.

The story of Ira Zbarsky is the story of a Jewish Canadian businessman who, back in 1999, ended up in a Texas jail because of a minor pot offence for which he had paid a $25.00 fine twenty years earlier in 1978. 

When I was alerted to Mr. Zbarsky’s plight by those in Vancouver, B.C. who were desperately trying to bring his story to the attention of the public I didn’t read the reports and say to myself, “Why should I come to the assistance of this person, he’s just another Jew and I couldn’t care less what happens to him because I “hate” Jews.” Why would I refuse to come to his aid by using my publication to advance his unjust plight? So he was Jewish. So what. He could have been Irish. Or German. Or African. Or whatever nationality or race. It wouldn’t have mattered a damn to me. My loving wife of 37 years also came from a Jewish family and I sure as hell wouldn’t stand by and allow her to be thrown in jail for months merely because her parents came from that same ethnic group.

And so, rightly, I did a front page story on Ira Zbarsky’s unjust treatment by the US authorities and the result was that his situation turned around and more and more media began to focus on him and before long he was released from jail and safely back in Canada.

There are dozens, if not more, other stories where I have used my publishing business to come to the aid of the oppressed and downtrodden and misrepresented and those without a voice to tell their story. Never once did I refuse to help those in need because of their racial or ethnic origins and that has been my practise since June of 1998 when I first entered the publishing business as an alternative news and opinion media outlet.

The real haters are those who will do anything in their power to silence the truth wherever it arises.]

VANCOUVER, B.C.:- Ira Zbarski, a Canadian citizen held in a Texas immigration prison since December 4, 1999, was was again denied a decision of release or deportation. He was called today before Judge Tovar at 10:30 AM local time. He was asked if he had evidence for his own case. He was told by the judge that he needed two additional copies of his evidence for the merits hearing scheduled for 1:00 PM this afternoon, with several hours specially set aside to hear his evidence. The judge would be in a position to offer Mr. Zbarsky’s release or deportation once Mr. Zbarsky had an opportunity to enter his evidence into the court’s record at the merits hearing.

Screen Shot 2015-10-21 at 6.58.56 PM

Mr. Zbarsky said that he had been held in solitary confinement for the last four days.He explained to the judge that he was not able to do photocopying during that time. He was permitted to leave his cell for only 1 hour three times per week for exercise.

Mr. Zbarsky offered to do the photocopying of the documents prior to the merits hearing at 1:00 PM. Judge Tovar refused. The prosecuting attorney also offered to do the photocopying prior to 1:00 PM but the judge refused this as well. Mr. Zbarsky then asked Judge Tovar for a written order that Mr. Zbarsky might present to guards in order to get the right to do photocopying, but the judge refused to that as well. Judge Tovar then rescheduled Mr. Zbarsky’s merits hearing for the third time, to Monday, February 7, at an unspecified time.

Screen Shot 2015-10-21 at 6.58.02 PM

Mr. Zbarsky has been at the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) Port Isabel Service Processing Centre, Los Fresnos, Texas (aside from short periods in other jails) since December 4, 1999. Ira Zbarski has been detained for nine weeks as part of a US Immigration removal process based on a minor Canadian conviction that occurred 22 years ago.

Mr. Zbarski has stood up for his rights and the rights of others while detained. It appears that, in consequence, Mr. Zbarski is being subjected to unfair detainment based on technicalities.

Mr. Zbarski has protested the conditions and policies of the INS since he was arrested. He has called for remedies to beatings, unwarranted searches, unwarranted surveillance of females by male guards, and the lengthy removal process. He has written letters, participated in a petition, and gone on two hunger strikes.

The first hunger strike, in December, called for a tribunal process to hear and act on detainee complaints. The second hunger strike, in which other detainees participated, and which Mr. Zbarsky terminated yesterday, February 1 due to poor health, called for Mr. Trominski (202-425-7333) the INS District Officer in Harlingen, Texas, to speed up the removal process by which detainees are released, deported or freed on bail.

Mr. Zbarski’s reports on INS detention center abuses are being collected by Nathan Selzer of Proyecto Liberated, of Harlingen, Texas, and the American Friends of Service Committee, of Philadelphia.

Friends and associates of Mr. Zbarski who are connected with SAPED (Shuswap Association for the Promotion of Eco-Desarrollo [Development]) are calling for the unconditional release and return to Canada of Mr. Zbarski, the truck he was driving, and its contents.

As well SAPED is asking the Canadian government to continue to assist Ira Zbarsky, and, if necessary, assist him in an appeal once he is back in Canada.

SAPED is also asking the Canadian government to consider carefully its policies of sharing information with US police and immigration authorities, given that Canadian citizens can be detained in US prisons that violate United Nations principles on detainees and basic Canadian rights.

SAPED is also cautioning the Canadian government to ensure that it maintains policies independent of the US on criminal law, surveillance of citizens, and the sharing of legal and criminal information with the US.

They are calling on the US government to comply with United Nations standards and covenants for the treatment of all detainees, including migrants and asylum seekers.

—-

(See Backgrounder Story on Page 11. Ed.)

 

Screen Shot 2015-10-21 at 6.56.24 PM copy

DETENTION IN TEXAS: IRA ZBARSKY STORY

By Suzanne Rose

The Radical 

Vol. 2 No. 8 February, 2000 Page 11

EARLY YEARS

Ira Zbarsky is a Canadian citizen, who resides in Vancouver. He was raised in Montreal. As a young man he worked on a kibbutz in Israel. In the 1970’s and 1980’s, he organized the cooperative production and distribution of organic food in the interior of British Columbia. He has a special love for orchards and farming. Mr. Zbarsky has devoted many years to green issues: the permaculture, organic food, cooperative and bioregional movements, and Green politics. He has served as external secretary for the Green Party of British Columbia and for the Green Party of Canada. He has also supported aboriginal issues.

SAPED

Mr. Zbarski has spent the last ten years working with Mayans in Guatemala and Southern Mexico. He is the project director for SAPED (Shuswap Association for the Promotion of Eco-Desarrollo [Development]), a registered Canadian charity formed in 1990 and based in Vancouver, B.C. SAPED’s goals are to promote community-based, ecologically-responsible and culturally-respectful development, using principles of mutual aid, appropriate technology, energy conservation and permaculture.

Screen Shot 2015-10-21 at 6.54.45 PM

ZBARSKY’S WORK WITH MAYANS

For much of the year, Mr. Zbarsky is in the Western Highlands in Guatemala and Mexico, working with several Mayan coalitions, each serving many community groups of Mayans. These people are working on projects such as natural plant-dyeing, medicinal herb gardens, livestock shelters, hand-crank roof tiles, tree nurseries, greenhouses, pedal-powered grain grinders, energy-conserving stoves, sewing and typing academies. He is also assisting with setting up an indigenous rights and training centre and a natural agriculture centre in the region.

Screen Shot 2015-10-21 at 6.55.40 PM

ZBARSKY’S ARREST IN TEXAS

Ira Zbarsky was returning from work in Guatemala and Southern Mexico when he was arrested and detained by US Immigration on December 4, 1999, at Roma, Texas. At that time, the truck he was driving was seized. It was carrying textiles from Guatemala and organic coffee from Souther Mexico, to be sold in Canada as part of a fair trade exchange. Although Mr. Zbarsky has traveled through the US many times, he was this time detained based on a conviction which appears in a computer database which the US immigration officers were using. Mr. Zbarsky was convicted in 1978 for possession of marijuana (for medicinal purposes). His fine in 1978 was $25.00, which is so low that it suggests there were mitigating circumstances.

ZBARSKY’S DETAINMENT IN TEXAS

Since December 4, 1999, Ira Zbarski has been detained by the US Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS). He is presently being held in Port Isabel Service Processing Centre, an immigration detention camp in Los Fresnos, Texas. He has legal advice but he is defending himself. He was willing to accept release or deportation at his first hearing, December 16, 1999. He wished to explain the nature of his 1978 conviction, because the 1978 judge was sympathetic to his use of marijuana for medicinal purposes. He requested bail December 16 and at a bail hearing January 7, 2000, this request was denied. He participated in a discovery trial January 12 and was to participate in the merits (final) hearing January 21. The merits hearing was canceled due to the judge’s illness. On January 24, Mr. Zbarsky was assigned a new merits hearing on February 2, 2000.

Screen Shot 2015-10-21 at 6.55.58 PM

ZBARSKY’S ACTIONS WHILE DETAINED

December 8-15  After public complaint on his own behalf, Ira Zbarsky was transferred from jail to jail in shackles on arms and legs, and kept for 5 days in solitary confinement.

December 22  Mr. Zbarsky, plus 18 other detainees, submitted a letter requesting hot water, warm clothing, conjugal visits, among other concerns. He also requested help from outside the prison for a Muslim detainee from Burkina Faso, Fousseni Banao, and for visits by prison monitors. Mr. Zbarsky, after requesting access to his mail that day, was pushed by two guards against a metal pipe and sworn at. Mr. Zbarsky went on a hunger strike, requesting a written apology for gross disrespect and a general tribunal process for detainee complaints.

December 30  Mr. Zbarsky ended his hunger strike. Head supervisor Jesus Rosales agreed to the setting up of a tribunal process to hear detainee complaints.

January 7-10  Mr. Zbarsky learned of the beatings that had just occurred to Alex Seymour Kerr, a Jamaican detainee in the same facility.

January 10  Mr. Zbarsky submitted letters to head supervisors Jesus Rosales and Yza Guirre, calling for an inquiry into the beatings of Mr. Kerr, the recognition of the right of bail for Texas residents, and a complaint process for problems with health services. He threatened to go on a another hunger strike. Mr. Rosales agreed to the inquiry and to direct access to the medical chief Dr. Freeth for complaints.

January 14  Mr. Zbarsky submitted a letter to an INS guard for delivery to Mr. Rosales and Yza Guirre, requesting the ending of body searches when detainees leave the dining area. He was pushed around and yelled and sworn at by three INS guards. He also sent a letter to the head of the INS. Ms. Doris Meissner, asking for improved training of guards in order that they might treat detainees with respect.

January 24  Mr. Zbarsky has submitted with other detainees a letter requesting that male guards refrain from watching surveillance videos of female detainees. Mr. Zbarsky started another hunger strike to demand from authorities that they put in writing their earlier promise to set up a tribunal process for detainees, given that they had not conducted an inquiry process into the beatings of Mr. Kerr, who has since been moved out of the facility.

January 25  About 40-50 detainees held a public meeting to plan a protest to the slow deportation process.

January 26  About 30 detainees start a hunger strike plus start a petition to authorities, calling for either speedup of release, either deportation or access to bail, unless the person is considered a risk to the US government or a flight risk.

January 27  INS authorities promised to investigate thoroughly the cases of the strikers plus certain other cases.

January 28  Ira Zbarsky and one other man remain on the hunger strike, seeking that EM Trominski, a higher-level INS authority, investigate the systematically-long delays to hearings.

Mr. Zbarsky is documenting the incidents of abuse and disrespect that he is aware of. He is passing them on to Nathan Selzer, a detainee abuse researcher with the Prison Monitoring Program of the American Friends Service Committee, of Philadelphia, and Proyecto Liberated, of Harlingen, Texas. The Muslim Immigration and Refugee Service of New York is also supporting Mr. Zbarsky’s efforts on behalf of detainees.

If you wish more information, there is available from Suzanne Rose a summary of the relevant United Nations covenants and rules, and a list of websites pertaining to US INS prison abuses and violations of human rights.

SEND A LETTER TO YOUR REPRESENTATIVE

Minister of Foreign Affairs,
Lloyd Axworthy
Fax: 613-996-5358
Justice and Attorney General of Canada,
Hon. Anne McLellan
Fax: 613-943-0044
International Cooperation
Hon. Maria Minna
Fax: 613-996-7942
Citizenship and Immigration,
Hon. Elinor Caplan
Fax: 613-992-0887
Mail address for all Canadian MP’s:
House of Commons,
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
K1A 0A6
Doris Meissner, Office of the Commissioner,
U.S. Department of Justice and Immigration and Naturalization Service
435 1 Street, N.W. Washington, D.C.
20536
Fax: 202-305-4823
Janet Reno, Office of the Attorney General,
950 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W.
Washington, D.C.
20530 – 0001
Madelaine Albright, Secretary of State,
U.S. Department of State,
Washington D.C.,
20520

 

You could write to your Member of Parliament or Congress and your Justice, Foreign Affairs and Immigration authorities. Zbarsky’s Canadian Case Number is 99 435832.

Ask them why a Canadian citizen must be held in an American prison for more than two months awaiting a judgment on whether to be released or deported from the United States due to having a 1978 marijuana possession charge, with a fine of $25.00. As them what would happen if an American showed up at the Canadian border with a similar conviction to Mr. Zbarksy’s. Would that person be arrested and jailed for months?

There is currently a movement in Canada to purge old minor Canadian convictions from the records. Will these convictions remain in US Immigration Lookout System computer database? Call on authorities to release  Zbarsky unconditionally, investigate the US INS treatment of Zbarsky and the people he has reported on, stop violating UN rules by mistreating non-US citizens in immigration facilities, and change the laws concerning the maintaining and sharing of old minor conviction records by Canadian and US authorities.

 

•••0•••

Please help out with my upcoming Sec. 319(2) “Hate Propaganda” trial that commences in one week on October 26th by making a donation.

Donations can be made online via my GoGetFunding site located at http://gogetfunding.com/canadian-publisher-faces-jail-for-political-writings/ or else by sending cash, cheques or Money Orders to the following postal address.

Please make sure that any cheques or Money Orders are made out to – Arthur Topham – and sent to:

Arthur Topham
4633 Barkerville Highway
Quesnel, B.C.
V2J 6T8

 

JUST DO IT! a Radical Press public service announcement

VOTE copy 6

Notice from RadicalPress.com regarding trial date for R v Roy Arthur Topham and support.

TRIAL OF ATNOTICE

Dear Reader and Supporter of Free Speech in Canada.

There remains but three weeks before the trial begins which will determine the course of future events here in Canada with respect to a citizen’s Constitutional Right to freedom of expression.

I would ask of you that you download this post/notice to your computer and send it out to as many of your friends and associates as you can.

It would be great to see the courtroom filled with Canadians who believe in their right to freedom of speech.

Anyone thinking of attending the trial is welcome to contact me regarding accommodations and directions, etc. Unfortunately I won’t be able to host those planning to attend this event.

I can be reached via email at radical@radicalpress.com or via telephone at 1-250-992-3479.

Thank you for all your help and support!

 

Sincerely,

Arthur Topham

Zionist Jew Lobby B’nai Brith Canada Attacks Buddhist Truth Revealer Brian Ruhe by Arthur Topham

BuddhaAttackHdr copy 2

 

BodhisattvaVow

Zionist Jew Lobby B’nai Brith Canada Attacks Buddhist Truth Revealer Brian Ruhe

by

Arthur Topham

They say that the Devil never rests and in the case of Canada’s rabid Zionist Jew lobby organization B’nai Brith Canada truer words were never spoken.

Not wishing to await the outcome of the upcoming trial of R v Roy Arthur Topham set to commence on October 26th, 2015 –  the result of which will play heavily into whether or not the pro-Israeli, Zionist lobbyist will have been successful in using their Sec. 319(2) “Hate Propaganda” legislation, which they successfully embedded into Canadian jurisprudence in order to censor and suppress any and all legitimate criticism of their nefarious political ideology and their detestable terrorist, racist supremacist actions in Palestine and around the world – the Zionists are continually combing the Internet here in Canada trolling with vehement and fanatical Simon Wiesenthal “Nazi-hunting” fervour for more truth seekers who are courageously revealing the plethora of lies that the Zionist controlled msm has been mind-controlling the masses with for the past century.

There are more victims of Zionist misfeasance in former democratic Canada than the recent case of Buddhist author and teacher Brian Ruhe of Vancouver, B.C., the foremost being that of Vancouver’s Chinese artist and writer Joe Canuck whose two websites www.joecanuck.net and www.joecanuck.wix.com/justiceforchinese were both surreptitiously and summarily silenced and removed from the net by the server www.wix.com without explanation to the owner, but for now I will focus on Ruhe as his woes are well documented.

What is rather unique about this latest provocation by the Zionist Jew control freaks from B’nai Brith Canada is that they usually spend their time and taxpayer’s money attacking Christians who they feel they can accuse of spreading “hate” toward their self-chosen tribe of spiritual delinquents in order to have their victim’s tossed in the slammer for a couple of years and their websites either taken down and/or, as in the recent case of Canada’s coffee and donut franchise Tim Hortons, if nothing else, at least have their sites blocked from access by the general public.

These Talmudic Marxist Bolshevik Communist inspired censors from B’nai Brith Canada are relentless and deeply disturbed individuals – their insecurity and paranoia being paramount and the transparency of their actions blatantly obvious in every act they perform. Rather than openly debating those who criticize aspects of their own ideological foundations and proving them wrong they prefer to use their “power of the purse” and their undue political, legal and media influence to simply vilify and slander their intellectual opponents and in the process do anything they can to discriminate against and harass them and destroy their financial means of survival.

In the case of Vancouver based Buddhist teacher Brian Ruhe, rather than attempt to have him charged with a Sec. 319(2) “Hate Propaganda” Criminal Code of Canada offence, they’ve decided to do everything in their power to both discredit his good name amongst his employers and destroy his livelihood at all costs. This is the first instance that I’ve heard of where they are working their vile black sorcery behind the scenes in order to destroy the reputation and good will of a recognized and practising Buddhist. Once again living proof that their Talmudic mindset has absolutely no regard for any other religions or beliefs besides its own supremacist, racist ideology.

Readers who have been following my own case in the courts over the past 9 years of litigation brought on by this same notorious group of self-deluded sycophants for the state of Israel will know that recently I was interviewed on video by Brian Ruhe while in Vancouver early this year while looking after my dying brother. The purpose of the interview was to assist me in raising awareness about Canada’s disgusting, unjust “Hate Crime” legislation (Sec. 318 to 320 CCC) which the Zionist Jew lobby was directly responsible for creating for their own self-serving purposes as well as helping me to raise funds for my upcoming trial this October.

Meeting Brian for the first time in the flesh it was easily discernible to me that here was another individual who had finally, through his own researching and seeking, come to the full realization that all we had been told and taught about world history over the past century was twisted and warped beyond comprehension by the Zionist Jew media acting in and through all of its shape-shifting aspects, be they academia, Hollywood movies, books, magazines, radio stations, tv news and the Zionist newspaper monopoly.

Brian Ruhe is the author of two well-known and loved books on Buddhism. His first work, Freeing the Buddha, pictured below was published in March of 1998.

FreeingtheBuddha copy

FreeingtheBuddha 1 copy

Brian’s second work, A Short Walk On An Ancient Path, came out in 2010 accompanied, as in his first work, with many positive reviews.

ShortWalkonÅncientPath copy

ShortWalkonÅncientPath 1 copy 6ShortWalkonÅncientPath 1 copy 4

ShortWalkonÅncientPath 1 copy 5

Upon reading the book reviews and accolades it was quite apparent that Brian Ruhe was/is a well loved and respected Buddhist meditation instructor. He had moved to Vancouver back in 1980 from Ontario where he’d studied business and philosophy at Brock University. Following a few years stint as a financial planner Brian’s inner quest for greater spiritual understanding finally moved him to begin his search for a deeper understanding of life. Like many of his generation he was drawn to Buddhism because of its focus upon the mind and the age-old practise of seeking within one’s own being for the truths that the soul eternally strives to attain.

Brian’s path led him to a Tibetan Buddhist centre in Vermont, USA that had been founded by the world reknowned Buddhist teacher Chögyam Trungpa. From there he traveled to Thailand where he continued his spiritual efforts for the next four years and was trained to be a meditation instructor. Brian eventually returned to Canada in order to begin sharing his teachings with others.

It wasn’t coincidental nor did it require any amount of foresight to realize that while in conversation with Brian at his Kitsilano apartment in Vancouver during the course of our interview we openly discussed the prospect that it was merely a matter of time before he would, in all likelihood, like myself, soon show up on B’nai Brith Canada’s radar screen and the attack upon his name and work would commence. In fact, it wasn’t long after doing the video with Brian I learned from him that he was being attacked front, left and center by the Zionist forces embedded throughout our pro-Israel, Jewish-influenced cultural institutions.

Of course, as per usual, it began with a Zionist Jew “Lama” (try wrapping your mind around that one!) by the name of “Tsewang” who phoned Brian at his home and threatened to call B’nai Brith Canada (BBC) and report him. Once he did that B’nai Brith’s Victoria based sayan operative* wrote to the Vancouver Parks Board and had Brian fired from teaching at (four) community centres.

On Sept. 14th Mr. Ruhe did get fired from the Roundhouse Community and Arts Centre. When this despicable act occurred Brian Ruhe phoned the sayan agent in Victoria, B.C. and spoke to him.  The BBC operative told Brian “I don’t think you’re qualified to teach.” He then threatened to contact the Vancouver Police force and register a complaint of harassment against Mr. Ruhe for actually having the chutzpah to call him on the telephone to discuss his rash and hateful behaviour!

Following word of his dismissal Brian also wrote a letter to Craig Giles – President of the Roundhouse Community and Arts Centre stating in part,

“As the president of the association you are in a leadership position in our community and it doesn’t make sense that someone in Victoria should tell you how to do your job. Were you under pressure from any quarters to fire me? Did City Manager Penny Ballem have anything to do with this?

I have taught meditation for 16 years at the Roundhouse since 1999 with over 1000 people taking my classes there in groups from 5 to 25. This has helped a lot of people and I have a good reputation with these students. I’ve always enjoyed working with the staff and have had a very good relationship with them all these years. I have booked Tuesday nights here and now it’s too late to work somewhere else for the fall term.

This is a larger issue of freedom of speech in Canada. I was fired for using my freedom of speech in my YouTube videos where I discuss truth search themes about geopolitical power in the world and 20th century history. I didn’t discuss these views in my meditation classes, I was not accused of doing so and there were no complaints from the students in my classes. I feel that I am showing a high moral standard by speaking out for the benefit of humanity. Our country was founded on the fundamental principle of freedom of speech and our forefathers fought for the freedoms that you and I have today. You are in a leadership position so I ask you to consider this and write back to me with your thoughts on this please.

Thank you kindly,

Brian Ruhe

brianruhe.ca

So that in a nutshell is what is now happening here in Canada when anyone decides to question the Zionist Jewish narrative whether it be their “Holocaust Hoax” of the 20th Century, their actions in Gaza against the indigenous true Semitic people of Palestine, their media control over Canada and the West,  or any number of other facets of the Zionist paradigm that the Jews subject their host societies to in order to maintain their power base throughout the Western world.

Brian Ruhe’s experience is not new. Je Suis Brian Ruhe! There have been dozens of other Canadians before him (including yours truly) who have suffered the slings and arrows of outrageous falsehood by the political machinations of this tribe of psychopathic deviants willing to go to any length to prevent the world from knowing the truth about their dark and sinister agenda for total global control of the world’s resources, both natural and human.

In a very real sense this is the essence of all that I have fought against over the past nine years of ongoing litigation brought on by this power-crazed Rothschild Freemasonic organization known as B’nai Brith Canada. It began on Valentine’s Day February 14th, 2007 when this same deluded maniacal sayan first sent me an unsolicited email using a phoney alias “Brian Esker” accusing me of being an “anti-Semite” and demanding that I stop publishing articles on the Zionist Jews and remove the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion from my website.

Come October 26th, 2015 here in Quesnel’s Supreme Court we will see whether or not these past nine years of harassment, intimidation, arrest, incarceration and theft of my personal computers, files and firearms will end with a victory for freedom of speech in Canada and a loss for the likes of this traitorous foreign lobby group B’nai Brith Canada and their sleazy serpentine zombie trolls. If it doesn’t then we will all be held hostage to these alien enemy interlopers who’ve been destroying our nation and culture for the past century and the country will be torn further and further apart as they once again destroy another gentile nation in their heinous game of power and control over humanity.

Justice must and Will prevail.

——-

* [Editors Note: I am restricted by a court order from publishing the name of this B’nai Brith agent.]

••••  ••••

Please help out with my upcoming Sec. 319(2) “Hate Propaganda” trial in October by making a donation.

Donations can be made online via my GoGetFunding site located at http://gogetfunding.com/canadian-publisher-faces-jail-for-political-writings/ or else by sending cash, cheques or Money Orders to the following postal address. Please make sure that any cheques or Money Orders are made out to – Arthur Topham – and sent to:

Arthur Topham
4633 Barkerville Highway
Quesnel, B.C.
V2J 6T8

TIM HORTONS SUCCUMBS TO ZIONIST LOBBY PRESSURE AND BLOCKS RADICALPRESS.COM AGAIN! By Arthur Topham

TimCup???

RPpublisherinTimHortons

THAccess denied

ATEditorPic185

EDITOR’S UPDATE – Well it looks as though I was wrong in my estimation of Tim Hortons. Timmy DID NOT UNBLOCK RADICALPRESS.COM after all.  When I first published a Thank You post on August 25th they had unblocked my site but then within a day or so the censorship freaks from the Zionist-controlled B’nai Brith Canada were once again on their case and the block was back in effect and is still preventing readers from accessing RadicalPress.com in all the Tim Hortons outlets across Canada.

TimsQuesnel

At this point in time I’m undecided as to whether or not to openly promote a BOYCOTT TIM HORTONS CAMPAIGN. There were some amazingly well written letters to Tim Hortons requesting that they not censor my website but all of them appear to have had little effect on changing Timmy’s mind.

My time at the moment must be focussed on the upcoming trial but please do not hesitate to write to Tim Hortons and express your disgust with their Orwellian Zionist policy of censoring online websites. Try to bcc me at radical@radicalpress.com and I will compile an article later with all the requests (minus names and addresses). Thanks.

Time Hortons can be contacted here: TimHortonsWiFi@timhortons.com

—— 

Tim Hortons Censors RadicalPress.com in their Coffee Outlets across Canada by Arthur Topham

TimHortonCensorship

Tim Hortons Censors RadicalPress.com in their Coffee Outlets across Canada

By
Arthur Topham

RPEdNew300 copy

Will it ever end? Everywhere we turn these day on the Internet someone is trying to censor you. Now it appears that one of Canada’s oldest coffee outlets, Tim Hortons, has also joined the Zionist Jews in deciding who they will allow their customers to visit online while they’re having coffee and a donut.

Over the past while I’ve had a number of readers email me telling me that when they’re in Tim Hortons they can’t access my website and when they try to they get the following message pop up on their screen:

THAccess denied

“inappropriate content”???!!! Says who? Is there someone working in this coffee venue who sits and views every website on the net and makes some subjective, arbitrary decision that they don’t like RadicalPress.com and so they simply block it to spare their thousands of customers from seeing the site?

Well I certainly don’t think there’s anything “inappropriate” on my site and so on August 11, 2015 I sent an email to Tim Hortons at the address they provide in their pop-up window TimHortonsWiFi@timhortons.com saying:

Dear Tim Hortons WiFi,

It has been brought to my attention by a number of my readership both here in British Columbia and also in Alberta that when frequenting your coffee outlets they are unable to access my website RadicalPress.com.

Being a regular visitor to one of your outlets in Quesnel, British Columbia where I live and run my publishing business I have also experienced this. Here is a screen shot of what readers and I see when we go to visit my site and read articles and news stories which I have been publishing online for the past 16 years. (see above)

I am not sure where you have received your information that there is “inappropriate content” on my site but my educated guess is that whatever software you are using for your WiFi system has erroneously and/or possibly intentionally included my website for purely political reasons.

I have ran a publishing business here in British Columbia  since June of 1998 and have been online since 1999. While Radical Press is known to be a part of the Alternative News media rather than the Mainstream media this does not imply that the content on my website is somehow “inappropriate”. It may be contrary to the Mainstream media but then that is perfectly legitimate in a free and democratic society such as Canada is.

I would therefore request that you please unblock my website so that your customers can not only enjoy your fine coffee but also whatever news sites that they, of their own free will, choose to visit while they are in your restaurant.

Since realizing that you are censoring my business I have stopped visiting my local Timmy’s and now spend my money at Starbucks instead. I would like to be able to buy your coffee and donuts as I have been doing for many many years but of course I expect you to respect my right to remain in business as well.

I look forward to hearing from you regarding this matter at your earliest convenience.
Sincerely,

Arthur Topham
Pub/Ed

radical@radicalpress.com
The Radical Press
Canada’s Radical News Network
“Digging to the root of the issues since 1998”

The next day, August 12, 2015 I received the following email from TimHortonsWiFi@timhortons.com:

Good day,

Thank you for your email.
We have received your request and it is in the process of being reviewed.

TimHortonsWiFi@timhortons.com

I immediately replied saying, “Thank you for your prompt reply. I will await your review.”

By August 16 I still had no response and so I wrote again saying:

Dear TimHortonsWiFi,

It is my understanding that you are in the coffee and food industry and not in the business of censoring websites that are legitimate business enterprises.

I feel that you’ve had more than sufficient time to come to what ought to be a very simple solution which is to unblock my site.

We in the Alternative News Media don’t take too kindly to harassment and censorship as that is the main reason why we exist because the mainstream media isn’t doing its job.

I will ask you civilly once again to unblock my site and should I not get a clear answer from you within 48 hours then you will have to bear the consequences of your irresponsible actions.

You have absolutely NO reason to be doing this and ought to be ashamed of your undemocratic, communist tactics.

The next day, August 17, I received an identical reply as I did the first time I contacted them telling me that my “request is in the process of being reviewed”.

Again I replied by stating:

It’s apparent that you either have a robot responding to my emails or else you are not serious in attending to my concerns regarding your censorship actions against my website.

As I stated I would like my site unblocked within 48 hours.

By August 19, 2015 there was still no reply forthcoming from TimHortons so I sent them one final email stating:

Dear TimHortons,

This is my final gesture of good will. You need to ask yourselves whether or not it’s worthwhile for you to be censoring other business’s websites.

I have yet to go online with my planned campaign of telling Canadians and the world at large about your illegal and unethical practises and the boycott of your business.

The following graphic is but a sample of what you will have to deal with.

TimHortonCensorship

Please reconsider your position and respond to me immediately or else I will take it that you are determined to block my site.

As of August 22, 2015 and numerous requests I’ve yet to hear back and so I’m taking my concerns online as I advised TimHortons.

Obviously whoever is in charge of dealing with blocked sites on Tim Hortons wifi is asleep at the wheel and in dire need of a Extra Large Triple Triple dark roast in order to wake them up!

This is where you, dear friends on Facebook and readers elsewhere can lend me a hand. It won’t cost you a cent. All you need to do is take a moment of your time and send Timmy a brief email asking them to unblock RadicalPress.com. When you do that please bcc me a copy of your email at radical@radicalpress.com so I can get an idea of how many requests are being sent to them.

I’m hoping that if they start to receive more requests than just from me that they will unblock the site.

Also, Tim Hortons is on Facebook as well so maybe those of you on FB might pop over to their page and post a comment regarding this matter. I certainly plan to do so.

Let’s see if we can help them to change their minds.

——

The Yoke of Law: Stopping the Homosexual Lobby Assault on our School Children Frank Frost Videos

FrankFrostYokeofLawHdr copy 2

VideoWarning