On behalf of my lovely wife Shastah and myself I want to take this moment to thank everyone who made our trip to the 24th annual George Orwell dinner in Victoria, B.C. a reality.

Travel from our relatively remote area of the province to the island is expensive and it was only due to the generosity of those who donated funds that we were able to attend this important gathering of free speech advocates from across Canada.

This was the second time that we were able to enjoy the fellowship of people on the front lines of those fighting to retain the right to speak out their truths in the face of a brutal and alarmingly dangerous force: the government of Canada and its bureaucratic agent known as the Canadian Human Rights Commission (CHRC).

Due to time restrictions at the moment I cannot elaborate on the meeting but will do so over the next while.

Arthur Topham

Pub/Ed

RadicalPress.com

[Editor’s Note: Elizabeth Dilling, all things considered, was a prophetess in her own time. Her various works, which include her exposure of the Zionist Jewish infiltration of the United States of America and her analysis of Bolshevism, Communism and Zionism as one Beast with numerous names, are a testament to her courage and her foresight in revealing the truth during a period of American history when to speak out was to risk the inevitable attacks by the Jewish establishment. Groups like the American Jewish Congress and B’nai Brith International and their attack-dog the Anti-Defamation League, were always ready and willing to vilify anyone who dared to speak out about their plans to implement their one world government and Elizabeth Dilling was forced to deal with their Talmudic tactics from the moment she picked up the sword of truth.

Each chapter of her book is preceded by the Forward and an Introduction. Readers who go beyond Chapter One will find it convenient to just scroll down the page until the start of the new chapter.]

—————

Foreword

Elizabeth Dilling Stokes was born, raised, and educated in Chicago. After attending the University of Chicago she married, and for many years devoted her life to her children, social activities on the North Shore of Chicago, and being a concert harpist. After hearing of the great “humanitarian experiment” in Soviet Russia, she traveled there in 1931, and was able to go behind the scenes. She was shocked at the forced labor, the squalid living quarters, and deplorable living conditions, and the atmosphere of fear created by the Soviet dictatorship.

She was most shocked by the virulent anti-Christianity of the atheist Communist regime.

Following her return to the United States she lectured and wrote about what she had seen, realizing from the opposition which immediately arose that a substantial Marxist movement was active in the United States.  In 1934 her first book The Red Network was published, an expose of the persons and organizations furthering Red causes in the United States.   In 1936, her second book, The Roosevelt Red Record and Its Background, was published.

Almost immediately after these books were published, she was attacked as “anti-semitic,” although she had actually offered her anti-Communist services to Jewish organizations, and knew nothing of organized Jewish involvement in the Marxist movement.  After researching and studying, however, in 1940 she published her third book The Octopus, which dealt with these subjects.

After World War II commenced, Mrs. Dilling became convinced that, despite President Roosevelt’s protestations that not one American boy would ever again fight on foreign soil, there was a movement afoot to involve the United States, with the result that a substantial part of the world would be communized later.

In 1941, she led a Mother’s March on Washington to oppose the “Lend Lease” bill, proclaimed to help keep us out of war by its sponsors, but proving the last step for our involvement.  The bill passed by only one vote.  A few months later, the United States went to war.

In 1944, Mrs. Dilling’s views involved her in the now infamous mass “sedition” trial.  The case was ultimately dismissed  by a Federal Court as “a travesty on justice.”

She was later remarried to Jeremiah Stokes, a Christian anti-Communist writer, and she continued to write and lecture in behalf of Christianity and Constitutional Americanism, first publishing this book in 1964.
(more…)

Thought Makes You Free In the EU [and Canada]
by Bernhard Schaub

The world is in flux. The financial crisis has shattered our too-blind faith in the regnant economic and political system. The good in this crisis: it makes you think. Many realize that the remedies proposed by government are no remedies at all, but merely measures intended to keep the existing system alive. The idea is spreading that the whole thing in reality is a giant redistribution intended to concentrate money and power into even fewer hands than before. It is high time to end our unquestioning ways with some serious thought.

The present economic system-like all systems-rests on certain axioms, certain underpinnings, that cannot be disturbed without putting the entire edifice into danger of collapse. Such underpinnings are for that reason always sacrosanct.

He who wishes to be accepted, or even merely tolerated in our society does well to acknowledge, or at least not to openly dispute, certain core beliefs: To these belong devotion to the free market, including debt financing and the independence of the banking system, to so-called parliamentary democracy, including the attendant two-party system, devotion to philo-semitism, multiculturalism, homosexuality, and abortion together with the highest praises for the civil rights to which one considers oneself entitled.

It is even permitted to belong to whatever religion or philosophy one might wish to-but subject to the unstated condition that one doesn’t really take it seriously. Otherwise, one acquires very quickly the odor of fundamentalism.

In today’s political and cultural landscape, a fundamentalist is anyone who holds his Catholic, or Evangelical, or Islamic, or national-or whatever feelings of any kind-above those highest of values enumerated above. Therefore, fundamentalists cannot be tolerated under the global New World Order that is the central theme of American politics. It is only a very slight distance that separates the fundamentalist from the charge of  being a terrorist. And it is not necessary here to spell out what sort of treatment awaits terrorists. That has been ordained by 9/11.

The thoughtful European notes with puzzlement that the proscriptions set forth by Political Correctness and monitored by the culture and the law grow more numerous every day. The citizen is condemned to silence by all manner of gag laws and cowed by the looming threat of the EU criminal code because he no longer knows what is punishable, nor why, nor where. Lately, we’re told, nearly 14,000 “rights violations”-whatever those might be-were committed in Germany in 2008, of which fully 700 were violent. Therefore, there remain from these numbers about 13,000 nonviolent “rights violations.” This is notable, especially in light of the incessant reminders by self-righteous German politicians to China and other countries to “uphold civil rights.” Obviously, the sacred rights of freedom of expression, academic freedom, religious or philosophical belief, etc., are valid only so long as they don’t oppose any of the listed Canons of Western Values.

Catch-22

Here is a Catch-22. It is profoundly disingenuous, not to say outright mendacious: an easily seen-through maneuver for the benefit of the ruling elites of the West.

The greatest taboo of Western propriety, however, is of a historical nature. That is, where the matter has to do with Nazism or the so-called Third Reich, contemporary thought abdicates completely. The brain is relieved of its function, and quasi-religious reflexes take over. All powers of discernment cease, any inquiry into the Holy Writ is thought inappropriate, even malign. Here there is only one viewpoint allowed: the Nazis-read, the Germans-are perpetrators, and exclusively that, and the Jews are victims, and innately and eternally, no less. The uproar about Erika Steinbach, Eva Herrmann, Martin Hohmann, and General Günzel serves to illustrate. Whoever doubts these supreme tenets of belief is no longer a discussion partner, but instead a leper and a heretic rolled into one, subjected instantly to inquisitorial judgment, ostracism, and economic destruction. And everyone who has anything to do with such a person must immediately distance himself.

This goes double for questions concerning the Holocaust, the inner circle of this minefield. The never-ending rumble of the media concerning Bishop Richard Williamson has brought this taboo to the fore once again. Mrs. Merkel feels called upon to instruct the Pope; the Pope feels called upon to call Bishop Williamson to account; the attorney general of Regensburg proposes, and the Justice Department considers issuing, an international arrest warrant for the churchman-and why? Because he judges a historical matter differently from the way it is usually and permitted to do. This constitutes heresy. This means nothing else than that a historical event has been removed from the domain of scholarship and with that, of reasoned discussion, and elevated into the domain of religion, and indeed a kind of world religion that in Germany has unbeknownst acquired the standing of a half-official state religion.

Bishop Richard Williamson

As the media campaign against Bishop Williamson rose to a fever pitch, the revisionist and lawyer Horst Mahler was sentenced in Munich to six years imprisonment and at the same time in Potsdam to four more years, because he questioned details of the Holocaust. In 2007, Mahler’s partner, lawyer Sylvia Stolz, was sentenced to 3 1/2 years’ imprisonment and escorted directly to jail from the courtroom. The reason: she defended the German-Canadian publicist Ernst Zündel in court in Mannheim and took the position that the accused was right, or at least that he was exercising his right to a dissenting opinion. Zündel himself got five years. Two years’ investigatory detention under the most dubious circumstances in Canada didn’t count. So Zündel does seven years because he published arguments over his Internet site concerning the historical thesis of the “mass gassing” of Jews.

Lawyer Sylvia Stolz and Revisionist and lawyer Horst Mahler

Shortly after Zündel, the chemist and multi-book author Germar Rudolf, originally a scientist at the Max Planck Institute in Stuttgart, received a sentence of 2 1/2 years because it was possible to arrive at the same conclusions from his neutral, scientific investigations in forensic chemistry as had been arrived at by other routes by earlier researchers.

  Scientist Germar Rudolf

The Frenchman Robert Faurisson, university professor for documentary research and textual analysis at the Sorbonne in Paris has been subjected to multiple fines of astronomic amounts, and has sustained bodily injuries from a beating administered by unidentified assailants.

Robert Faurisson-French Revisionist

One of the best-known revisionist researchers and writers is the Swiss Romanist and Scandinavist Jürgen Graf, sentenced to 15 months’ imprisonment by a Swiss court for questioning the holocaust hypothesis. He was able to avoid this imprisonment only by flight into exile.

Also in exile is the Belgian father of seven Vincent Reynouard. In Austria, court-expert-witness-engineer Wolfgang Fröhlich is in jail for the second time because he does not accept the official version of the holocaust.

Where is Amnesty International?

Where is Amnesty International? Where the European Court of Human Rights? Where the hue and cry of the media? Where the student protests? Where the Church?

All these men and women and many others, such as Ursula Haverbeck, Dr. Udo Walendy, Gerd Honsik, Dr. Max Wahl, Siegfried Verbeke, Gaston Amaudruz, have committed no offense other than to have arrived at conclusions from their research and analysis that diverge from the official account-and that they then addressed pointed questions to those who have promulgated the putative falsehoods around the world.

It is the pride of western science, since the Renaissance, and in particular since the Enlightenment, to allow nothing to be sacrosanct, and to accept nothing short of absolute objectivity. Revisionism-that is, discernment, confirmation, questioning-is a basic principle of science. All else is dogmatism. Science cannot admit of religious, political, or other social exceptions. In the sense of the natural sciences, there is no Christian reality nor Unchristian reality, no moral nor immoral fact. The scientist has the right to err, since no one is in possession of the absolute truth. Natural science has banished the medieval age of superstition with the age of reason.

As applied to research into the Holocaust, this means: it may not be clouded by philo-Semitic nor by anti-Semitic inclinations, any more than it may be by Germanophilic or Germanophobic. Whether one likes the Jews or the Germans, or dislikes them is no factor in research, and may not affect it in any way.

Ms Merkel said in her message to Pope Benedict XVI, “There may be no denial of the Holocaust.” What does this mean, there may not be? Does it mean that “denial” presupposes that someone advances lies while knowing better? This certainly doesn’t apply to the revisionists, who are convinced of their interpretations. Or does it mean that here, after all-trumping all factual inquiry-global political forces are  in play to which both the German head of state as well as the leader of Christianity must bow?

There is commentary that implies something pretty close to these conjectures. As early as May 1979, Professor William Rubinstein of the University of Melbourne, Australia, wrote in the Nation Review, “Were the Holocaust shown to be a hoax, the Number One weapon in Israel’s propaganda armory disappears.”

And after the lecturer and revisonist Günther Deckert was sentenced to years in jail, the  Frankfurter Allgemeine wrote on August 15, 1994, “If Deckert’s account of the Holocaust were correct, the Federal Republic of Germany would be founded upon a lie.” Every presidential address, every “moment of silence,” every history book would have lied. In that he denies the murder of the Jews, he contests the very legitimacy of the German Federal Republic.

The Canadian B’nai B’rith

But it seems that there are even higher matters at stake: the memory of the Holocaust is central to the erection of the new world order. So wrote Ian J. Kagedan, the Director of the Canadian B’nai B’rith in the Toronto Star for November 26, 1991.

These unseemly newspaper announcements enable us to understand why finally the effort to exhume the claimed victims and properly to account for them has not been undertaken; why Ms Merkel has not called an international Holocaust conference in Berlin and subjected the assertions of the revisionists to a public discussion and critique. With that, the sorry matter would once and for all be placed on the table and the “pseudoscientific bumbling” of the Holocaust deniers would be laid bare for all to see-and indeed by scientists, not just journalists. But therein, of course, argument and counter-argument would have to be heard.

Why can’t this be? Is it feared that such a discussion might produce results other than those that are politically desired? Is this why the revisionists languish in jail? Is this why their books are banned? Is the public to be denied the means of evaluating the state of the revisionist arguments?

The reason for this remarkable scientific regression appears to be the same as the reason for the judicial regression in the courtroom. Here also the established practice-which ashamedly is never admitted in public-that there is never inquiry into whether the accused might be right. Evidence is not taken, and if the accused should try to explain his position, he subjects himself to still further charges, and his attorney as well! A judicial monstrosity. The factuality of genocide of millions in gas chambers is simply declared “given,” and the court has merely to decide whether the defendant has contradicted this given - and then to arrive at a sentence. A historical assumption is thereby peremptorily raised to the status of a universally known and proven law of nature - and at the same time, factual confirmation of it is forbidden!

Who’s Afraid of the Big Bad Truth?

Is somebody afraid of the truth here?

The voices are becoming more numerous that advocate breaking the silence over this: in 2007, Professor Karl Albert Schachtschneider, professor of public inquiry at the University of Erlangen, spoke on the Constitution of the European Union. He took a question from the audience, “Do we have freedom of speech here?” He answered: “A country in which free speech is constrained by severe punishments  is not a free country. The immortal Kant said about freedom of speech that one must be free to say anything, whether it is true or untrue. With the Holocaust, anything might be true or not true; I wasn’t there. But another reason I don’t discuss it,  is that it is forbidden. One is not allowed to dispute it, not even scientifically. The prohibition on “agitation” prevents it. This is not a free country.”

If the “new world order” that the Canadian gentleman from B’nai B’rith mentioned might be in some way identical with that financial system that currently has thrown the world into the grips of an unprecedented crisis, it might in any case be appropriate to examine the central historical and philosophical foundations of that new order somewhat more closely.

“Where everyone condemns, one must prove. Where everyone praises, as well.”  Thought makes you free!

=====
The publicist and lecturer Bernhard Schaub (Dornach bei Basel), publisher of this newsletter, is Swiss. He was a teacher of German and history at Waldorf Schools  until he was dismissed in 1993 for publishing a book in which he cited objective research into the Holocaust. He also lost a later position as academic dean of an adult-education school for similar reasons. In 2006 he participated in the Holocaust Conference called in Tehran by President Ahmedinejad.

The Silence of the Wolves
by Arthur Topham

July 16, 2009

“They’re selling you billows of smoke and calling them the fires of Freedom! They’re peddling shadows and labeling them light beams of Truth.”

~from Memos to Myself, Arthur Topham, January 1, 2009

A June 24, 2009 letter by Cal Mahan of Calgary to the Calgary Herald, appearing under the byline “Find someone new” and in response to the paper’s June 21st Editorial, “CHRC seeks more powers,” stated:

“This editorial is an updated rehash of the Feb. 13 editorial “Would-be censor seeks red pencil” and other single-minded opinion pieces. The poster boys remain the same – Mark Steyn and Ezra Levant – two unsympathetic propagandists and bullies.
Can’t you find a more attractive victim of the witch-hunting human rights commissions, who would elicit more general public affinity for your otherwise media-centric cause?”

In many respects Mahan’s comments epitomized, in two pithy sentences, the reality of Canada’s mainstream media and its current one-sided, circumscribed perspective on the issue of freedom of speech in Canada and who will be given a platform to express their perspective on this highly contentious subject. In allowing only the poster boys Levant and Steyn to monopolize this debate within the pages of the Zionist-owned media the obvious bias is showing through. The fact that the same two rogues from out of the gallery of the human rights commission’s victims are inevitably given this privilege on a regular basis doesn’t sit well with many who see the cozy set-up that appears to exist between certain ethnic/religious groups and their counterparts in the media.

It also got me thinking about my own situation with respect to this issue of who gets to be highlighted by the media and who doesn’t. In the case of myself and my website RadicalPress.com it’s now been just over two years since Harry Abrams, B.C. representative for the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada along with his co-complainant Anita Bromberg, formally laid a complaint[1] with the Canadian Human Rights Commission under the notorious Section 13(1) of the Canadian Human Rights Act seeking “relief” for contended “discriminatory” publication of articles which they felt contrived “to promote ongoing hatred affecting persons identifiable as Jews and/or as citizens of Israel.”

Since receiving word of the complaint it’s become a full time profession for me trying to stave off this blatant attempt to silence my thoughts and opinions on an issue of public interest (Zionist politics) that is growing in leaps and bounds with each passing day.

(more…)

[Editor’s Note: My goodness those B’nai Brith censors are busy these days! If it’s not here in Canada harassing publishers such as RadicalPress.com it’s their clone-like clowns “down under” using precisely the same disgusting methodology to shut down free and democratic websites in Australia. It appears the colonies of the once great British Commonwealth are under attack by the Rothschild inspired Zionist Jews.

Again, it’s their pathetic cries of discrimination. In this case the farce goes to such lengths that its ridiculousness is beyond question. Imagine, these greedy mind-control freaks already own 99.9% of the world’s media with which they spew out their Zionist propaganda on a 24/7 basis year in and century out and yet they have the balls to accuse some alternative news site of not publishing enough pro-Zionist bullshit to suit the likes of their “Anti-Defamation Commission.”

It truly is mind-blowing to see the magnitude of their arrogance and self-righteous chauvinism and proves over and over the old maxim that power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely.

So Canada, stand on guard for your diminishing right to freedom of speech. It’s under attack big time and it’s damn time you woke up to the fact. No greater example of the aphorism: As Above, So Below could be given than what we’re witnessing with this incessant and stupid attempt on the part of B’nai Brith International to shut the goyim and the self-hating Jews up.

Read this pathetic article and weep. Then get off your butt and do something about it.]

——————-

B’nai B’rith charges Aussie Web site with anti-Semitic content

Jul. 4, 2009
sarah sechan,

THE JERUSALEM POST

The Australian-based news Web site http://www.newmatilda.com has been charged by the B’nai B’rith Anti-Defamation Commission (ADC) with featuring anti-Israel and anti-Semitic content, particularly during the first three months of 2009, despite claims from the Web site’s editor that it is providing fair coverage.

The ADC issued a report highlighting newmatilda’s Israel coverage, taking issue with the website’s balance of Israeli and Palestinian narratives and the proportion of stories covering the conflict in the region during these months, particularly concerning Gaza.

Contrary to the editor’s claims of providing fair coverage, the report states that 17 out of the 18 articles concerning Operation Cast Lead featured the Palestinian narrative. None of the articles could be characterized as balanced, and one article acknowledged the existence of competing narrative, but argued for the validity of the Palestinian narrative.

Many of the ADC’s concerns regarding newmatilda are rooted in the fact that as a new media source, newmatilda does not need to adhere to journalistic standards of reporting and opinion writing. As the writers are not necessarily trained journalists and their work does not fall under the jurisdiction of a news editor, such standards are not always upheld.

Despite the fact that Australia has laws against racial vilification, the report maintains that it is both more difficult to prosecute violations of these laws in new media sources and that incriminating articles are easier to remove. The report also claims that due to the fact that this information is made available to the general public, holding newmatilda to lower standards of journalistic integrity would be inappropriate.

During the period in which the ADC studied newmatilda, the site provided a disproportionate amount of coverage on Israel. More than one article per week was published on the subject during the first three months of 2009, while only one article addressed the situation in Burma and no articles covered Darfur, North Korea, Zimbabwe, and Tibet, other countries possessing humanitarian-related news.

Newmatilda features Al-Jazeera as its sole newsfeed. In its Frequently Asked Questions section, the site states that as Al-Jazeera has a non-Western focus, it brings balance to the Australian media, as it carries stories that Australians otherwise might not pursue. The ADC maintains that while Al-Jazeera is a legitimate news source, newmatilda offers no alternative sources which would present the other side of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

The issue which the ADC finds most disconcerting is the fact that the Web site maintains very lax control over its comments section, which features responses of a highly anti-Semitic and anti-Israel nature. The comments make a variety of claims, such as denying the Holocaust or claiming that it was exaggerated or “used” by the Jewish people; claiming that Jews have no right or historical attachment to Israel; that anti-Semitism does not exist; that Jews control the media; that Jews are a threat to the world and would infect the world with the plague; and that Israel is supported by “blood money.” While it is likely that some of these comments breach the racial vilification provisions of both the Australian states and Commonwealth, newmatilda rarely deletes them and when it does, it does not do so immediately - granting the comments an extensive readership.

In April, the ADC wrote to newmatilda, expressing concern over the site’s comments page. In response, Marni Cordell, editor of newmatilda, thanked the ADC for providing feedback and wrote “We believe we provide a fair coverage of this important nexus of issues - but we are very committed to publishing informed /opinion/ pieces, and our content reflects that. The possibility that your organization doesn’t share the outlook of the bulk of our contributors - who also differ among themselves - does not make us unfair.”

“If you read opinions on our site that are not commonly found in the major dailies or in publications like the Australian Jewish News, then that is one sign that we are doing our jobs,” Cordell’s response continued.

The ADC states that its primary concern regarding newmatilda is the effect that prejudicial coverage has on the attitude of Australians towards the Jewish people, both in Israel and in the Diaspora.

As there is a documented connection between events in Israel and incidents of local anti-Semitism, the report posits that by hosting comments slandering Israel and Jews on unjust terms, newmatilda’s lax policies undermine the freedom and security of Australian Jews, regardless of whether or not this is the site’s intent.
————

This article can also be read at http://www.jpost.com /servlet/Satellite?cid=1246443716603&pagename=JPArticle%2FShowFull

Arthur Topham
Pub/Ed
The Radical Press
Canada’s Radical News Network
4633 Barkerville Hwy
Quesnel, B.C. V2J 6T8
radical@radicalpress.com
http://www.radicalpress.com
“Digging to the root of the issues since 1998”
——————————————————-

Dear Radical Reader,

It’s been awhile since I’ve sent out any of Pastor Eli James’s writings. This article though is one which deserves the utmost attention by anyone concerned about their loss of freedoms whether they’re christian, pagan, atheist, buddhist, muslim, taoist or none of the aforementioned. The message crosses all boundaries and borders and will ring true to anyone who’s been paying attention to global events and the erosion of our cherished rights and freedoms, especially the right to express one’s opinions without fear of the Orwellian thought police busting down your door and hauling you away to some Stalinist Bolshevik “Show Trial.”

Freedom of Speech is the penultimate and quintessential right for without it we become but slaves to the state and to anyone wielding power for control over others.

Pastor Eli James pulls no punches in his heart-felt effort to alert his fellow Americans to the dangers posed by the Zionist Beast that now stalks the planet in search of more and more victims to feed its frenzied appetite for MORE control of our bodies, minds and spirits. His efforts and words apply just as much to Canada and every other nation of the world that’s been infiltrated and had their Constitutions abducted and usurped by this megalomaniacal psychopathic entity that’s out to fulfill its self-chosen agenda of world domination and one world “international” government.

It’s methods are systematic and once realized as predictable as one’s yearly tax notice or the waxing and waning of the moon. It’s greatest tactic of course is to create FEAR in whatever manner that it can, be it 9/11 or Hiroshima or Dresden or the Gulag Archipelago. Tyranny always has feasted upon fear and used fear to enhance the breadth and scope of its menacing and grasping tentacles. It knows how starved the world is for peace and love and it uses the mentally and spiritually emaciated masses and manipulates them via its news agencies into feeling insecure and afraid, for its then that they are most vulnerable to giving up their rights and freedoms.

The forces of Darkness by any other name still reek to high heaven. They do their utmost to force the faithful of any religion to take up arms against those who worship the one God under a different name. They’ve expended millions if not billions of the people’s money and wealth to create wars where innocents are led to sacrifice their lives for principles that ultimately become meaningless when the wars cease and the only winners are the Zionist elite who’ve fomented and feasted upon them and in the end acquired even greater riches and wealth while the blood of innocents soaks the planet and democracy reels and falters from the death blows dealt to it by the greed of a small number of psychopaths.

Everyone has a right to worship God in their own way. There is only one divine Presence, one divine Cosmos, one divine Purpose and that is LOVE AND PEACE AND BROTHERHOOD AND SISTERHOOD and a reverence for this garden given to us by the ONE CREATOR for the use of ALL.

We need to think about these things and start putting the pieces of the puzzle together. Pastor Eli James has done just that with his expose of the Zionist cartel that’s now ruling the world via subterfuge and ill-gained power and wealth.

Without these three cherished Freedoms it’s highly unlikely that we will ever, as a race of human beings, achieve the fourth freedom which Norman Rockwell illustrated so beautifully and aptly in the illustrations that I’m using. The last freedom is freedom from want. Freedom from having to live on the streets, homeless and starving and existing hand to mouth because of a few power-crazed groups who want to rule the resources of the world. Freedom to feed our children and our families and enjoy the fruits of this holy garden we call the Earth Mother.

Like the four directions of the native American spiritual teachers these four freedoms are the pillars that hold up the temple of LIFE. They are now threatened by an alien force. It has to be first recognized and then resisted and stopped. God willing that will happen with the courage and conviction of all who value these four noble truths.

Please pass this article to everyone you can. The fate of freedom depends on each and every one of us doing something to ensure it carries on to our children and grandchildren.

Shine your Light for Love & Peace & Justice for All,

Arthur Topham
Pub/Ed
The Radical Press
——————————————————-

The Articles of Tyranny

by Pastor Eli James

Church of the Restoration of True Israel
http://www.anglo-saxonisrael.com/

See also:

http://www.christogenos.com
http://www.skipbaker.com
http://www.prothink.com

“In my distress I cried unto Yahweh, and He heard me. Deliver my soul, O Yahweh, from lying lips and a deceitful tongue. What shall be given unto thee, or what shall be done unto thee, thou false tongue? Sharp arrows of the mighty, with coals of juniper. Woe is me, that I sojourn in Mesech, that I dwell in the tents of Kedar! My soul hath long dwelt with him that hateth peace. I am for peace: but when I speak, they are for war.” (Psalm 120)

“Beware the leaven of the Pharisees, which is hypocrisy.” (Luke 12:1)

Introduction

This essay is about lying tongues that hate peace. May our Father, Yahweh, grant to His Children, Israel (not to be confused with the Jews), the Great Awakening, which will open their eyes to truth that will set them free.

(more…)

“KAYJAY” THE TRIBUNAL KANGAROO PONDERING POULIN’S
PLEA  TO DISMISS TOPHAM’S MOTIONS AS BEING “GROUNDLESS”
AND “VEXATIOUS”
__________________________________________________________________

[Editor’s Note: The sound of kangaroos ruminating fills the air these days as the Show Trial of 2009 continues to unfold in parts of the blogosphere and on the alternative media sites around the world.

Not to be outdone by James von Brunn’s grand-standing attack at the Holy Hoax museum in Washington, DC, RadicalPress.com publisher and editor (moi) continues to challenge the forces of evil and repression and media censorship and mind-control.

The following letter to the parties involved in this censorship, Section 13(1) attack upon Free Speech serves to show the inequities of the present Human Rights Commissions and how they are as lop-sided as a kangaroo’s ear when it comes to distinguishing between threats of violence and intellectual exercises in the realm of politics.

As this “hearing” process continues to unfold I’ve tried my utmost to record and publish every bit of information connected to it so as to provide the reader public with an ongoing overview of just how these folks operate when they try to accuse and convict a critic of Israel and of political Zionism of being a rabid hatemonger and an anti-Jewite. God willing it may help others who may become ensnarled in the Section 13 gulag known as the Canadian Human Wrongs Act.

Please pass this on to others and please help out with a donation of coin if you can. See the top right hand corner of the home page for further instructions.]

——–

RE: MOTION TO RECONSIDER RE: JUNE 2, 2009 TRIBUNAL DECISION (2) TO ALLOW THE CHRC TO ALTER EVIDENCE IN THEIR STATEMENT OF PARTICULARS

BY EMAIL

Arthur Topham
Pub/Ed
The Radical Press
Box 4633 Barkerville Hwy
Quesnel, B.C. V2J 6T8
Email: radical@radicalpress.com

June 12,  2009

Nancy Lafontant
Registry Officer
Canadian Human Rights Tribunal
Nancy.Lafontant@chrt-tcdp.gc.ca

Dear Nancy Lafontant,

RE: Harry Abrams and the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada v. Arthur Topham and the RadicalPress.com

File Number: T1360/9008

I am in receipt of both Daniel Poulin’s reply of June 10, 2009 on behalf of the Commission, and that of Marvin Kurz, of June 11, 2009 on behalf of B’nai Brith regarding my June 10, 2009 MOTION TO RECONSIDER RE: JUNE 2, 2009 TRIBUNAL DECISION (2) TO ALLOW THE CHRC TO ALTER EVIDENCE IN THEIR STATEMENT OF PARTICULARS.

It is my position that counsel for both parties are rashly concluding that this motion, as well as previous ones, rather than being given due consideration by the Tribunal based upon the arguments and evidence contained therein, be merely viewed as “vexatious” and “frivolous” and that, further, because of this assumption on their part, we (meaning myself and RadicalPress.com as Respondent) and they (the Commission and the Complainants”), are in “alternative realities” respecting the issues at hand (the latter comment being Mr. Kurz’s).

The accusation that this motion is “vexatious” and “frivolous” and simply an annoying ploy to stymie the process, plus the further accusation of Mr. Kurz that the Respondent and the Commission/Complainants are in “alternative realities,” require further comment.

Based upon the positions taken by Mr. Poulin and Mr. Kurz, it is highly evident that they are concomitantly committed to abusing the legal process within which the Commission and the Tribunal operate in order to satisfy their mutual design of downplaying the importance of following proper procedure and keeping within the parameters of the real legal system which they are attempting, rather poorly, to mimic, in accordance with their own questionable objectives.

Mr. Kurz’s comments in this context do reflect the fact that on the question of correct adherence to jurisprudence, we are living in “alternative realities.” As such, what we are witnessing here, in these rather quick, ejaculatory comments on their part, is the fact that Mr. Kurz and the Complainants (and the Commission, by default) are not only out of touch with the reality in which I am present and function in but also the reality in which their own superiors live and operate.

In this regard I would further draw Mr. Poulin’s, Mr. Kurz’s, Ms Bromberg’s, Mr. Abrams’, the Commission’s and the Tribunal’s attention to the remarkable statement released yesterday by Frank Dimant, B’Nai Brith Canada’s executive vice president, as quoted by the Ottawa Citizen on June 11, 2009, and available for verification at
http://www.ottawacitizen.com/news/Rights+commission+rejects+call+quit+policing+online+hate/1686720/story.html

           FRANK DIMANT - BBC VP
________________________________________

In that article entitled, “Rights commission rejects call to quit policing online hate” Frank Dimant unequivocally stated, regarding Section 13 of the CHRA, that:

“What the Commission is recommending is, in essence, cosmetic tinkering to deal with a human rights system that is in need of a major overhaul “

A clear reading of this article illustrates the very points which I am arguing in this complaint: that the abuse of justice and the divergence from any principle even closely resembling human or civil rights, as applied in s. 13 cases, are so blatantly obvious that even the executive level of the Complainant’s organization, B’nai Brith Canada has come out publicly calling for a major overhaul.

My motions for disclosure of documents and correct presentation of evidence, referenced and commented upon in the responses by Mr. Poulin and Mr. Kurtz, exemplify the judicial and moral imperatives at issue here and thus constitute an appeal to the Tribunal that it order the parties involved to cease and desist with the abuses of power and abuses of process being conducted against me. They not only demonstrate the necessity identified by Frank Dimant’s public call, but also identify the fact that the “alternative reality” occupied by the CHRC and the Complainants is a perverse judicial Twilight Zone and a renegade digression from the “reality” espoused by the executive level of the Complainants’ own organization and, not least, the formal and real judicial system which all Canadians are subject to.

If there is any further formality or motion that you require, please let me know as soon as possible.

Sincerely,

Arthur Topham pro se
Publisher/Editor
The RadicalPress.com

Cc:
Anita Bromberg, Co-complainant
Marvin Kurz, Complainant Counsel
Harry Abrams, Complainant
Daniel Poulin, Commission counsel
Douglas Christie, Intervenor, Canadian Free Speech League

                     Paul Fromm, B.Ed, M.A.
Director
Canadian Association for Free Expression (CAFE)
_________________________________________________

As Publisher and Editor of RadicalPress.com I was most pleased and honoured to hear today from Paul Fromm, Director of CAFE, the Canadian Association for Free Expression, informing me that he has formally submitted a Notice of Motion to the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal requesting standing as an Interested Party in the ongoing complaint case involving myself, RadicalPress.com and Harry Abrams and the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada.

Paul brings with him a wealth of personal experience in dealing with the notorious Section 13(1) legislation contained in the Canadian Human Rights Act and should his organization be granted Intervenor status will undoubtedly be of immense value in highlighting the inequities and injustices which this particular piece of legislation poses to Internet users across Canada and all Canadians concerned about their basic human rights contained within Canada’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms which guarantee free expression to all citizens of this great nation.

I will be waiting with great anticipation to hear from the Tribunal on Paul’s application. God willing he won’t have to jump through all the hoops that Free Speech lawyer Doug Christie had to.

On behalf of myself and all those who are fighting this battle to regain our basic rights I want to thank Paul for his efforts and willingness to participate in this case.

Arthur Topham
Publisher/Editor
RadicalPress.com
————————–

Canadian Association for Free Expression
Box 332,
Rexdale, Ontario, M9W 5L3
Ph: 905-274-3868
FAX: 905-278-2413

Paul Fromm, B.Ed, M.A.
Director

Canadian Human Rights Tribunal
160 Elgin Street
11th Floor,
Ottawa, ON.,
K1A 1J4

Attention:  Nancy Lafontant, Registry Officer

Fax: 613 995-3484

June 10, 2009

Harry Abrams and the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada v. Arthur Topham and the RadicalPress.com

File Number: T1360/9008

Dear Ms Lafontant:

I write seeking leave to make a motion to obtain standing as an Interested Party making written and oral submissions in the matter of Harry Abrams and the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada v. Arthur Topham and the RadicalPress.com

I rely on the provisions of Rule 8(1) of the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal Rules Of Procedure (03-05-04):

8(1) Anyone who is not a party, and who wishes to be recognized by the Panel as an interested party in respect of an inquiry, may bring a motion for an order granting interested party status.

CAFE’s  mandate is to work toward the maximum latitude of the freedom of speech, freedom of the press and freedom of belief provisions of Sec. 2(b) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Founded in 1981, we have published extensively material supportive of these goals, made representations to various levels of government and obtained intervenor or Interested Party status in a number of cases.

We are especially concerned about efforts to restrict the Internet, which we see as an inexpensive and accessible medium to persons of modest means who might otherwise be excluded from some of the older more established media. We obtained Interested Party status in the Zundel Internet case (1997-2002), were an active participant, calling witnesses and making submissions. We were equally active in the Micka Internet case (2001). We participated as an “interested party” in more than 30 days of hearings in Toronto, Mississauga, Ottawa and Oakville in Warman v Marc Lemire.

Our perspective and experience may be of assistance to the Tribunal in considering that CAFE, as an “interested party” has appeared as an intervenor in more Sec. 13 Internet cases than any other entity in Canada. Furthermore, Mr. Fromm has extensive experience — more than any other person — as an agent in Sec. 13 cases (Warman v. Glen Bahr and Western Canada for Us; Warman v. Terry Tremaine; Warman v. Jessica Beaumont; Warman v. Ciaan Donnelly; Warman v. Melissa Guille and Canadian Heritage Alliance; Warman v. Jason Ouwendyk and the Northern Alliance; Canadian Centre for Research-Action on Race Relations v. BCWhitepride.com)

(more…)

[Editor’s Note: Yuppers, another Motion in response to the issue of the Canadian Human Rights Commission’s sneaky little plan to change the nature of the actual complaint laid against RadicalPress.com by Harry Abrams and the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada. Again, a move that the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal is attempting to aid and abet by endorsing the position of the Commission; one that blatantly changes the actual wording of the complaint from promoting “hatred toward Jews and/or citizens of Israel” to . . . get this, to promoting “hatred toward Jews and non-whites”!!!

Now, all of a sudden, in the midst of a near two year ordeal, the Commission has decided to drop the charge of promoting hatred toward citizens of Israel and instead have these citizens of Israel shapeshift into “non-whites”, whatever the hell that is supposed to mean!

Tribunal member Karen Jensen who is overseeing this aspect of the hearing has signed her name to the ruling indicating her complicity in accepting this absurd and illegal act on the part of the Commission. I, in turn, am trying to point out to member Jensen that the actions of the Commission and those of the Tribunal are beginning to take on a distinctly biased and partial character and are also making it extremely difficult for me to play by the rules.]

——–

JUDICIAL CHICANERY: MOTION TO RECONSIDER THE JUNE 2, 2009 TRIBUNAL DECISION (2) TO ALLOW THE CHRC TO ALTER EVIDENCE IN THEIR STATEMENT OF PARTICULARS

BY EMAIL

Arthur Topham
Pub/Ed
The Radical Press
Box 4633 Barkerville Hwy
Quesnel, B.C. V2J 6T8
Email: radical@radicalpress.com

June 10,  2009

Nancy Lafontant
Registry Officer
Canadian Human Rights Tribunal
Nancy.Lafontant@chrt-tcdp.gc.ca

Dear Nancy Lafontant,

RE: Harry Abrams and the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada v. Arthur Topham and the RadicalPress.com
File Number: T1360/9008

The enclosed notice of motion results from the June 2, 2009 email letter from the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal containing Tribunal member Karen Jensen’s decision with respect to my motion (2) of April 23, 2009, to further amend the CHRC’s statement of particulars.

In her decision Tribunal member Jensen states the following:

“Mr. Topham has requested that I order the Commission to amend its Statement of Particulars in which the Commission identifies the issue in the present case as being whether the communications allegedly made by the Respondent are likely to expose Jews and other non-whites to hatred or contempt, contrary to s. 13 of the CHRA. Mr. Topham maintains that the underlined portion of this statement should be changed to “and/or citizens of Israel”.

If Mr. Topham believes that Commission counsel has mischaracterized the issue, he is free to set out what he believes the issue to be in his Statement of Particulars and to argue that at the hearing. The Statement of Particulars provides the parties with an opportunity to present their views of the case. The pre-hearing process is not the time for a debate about those views; that debate takes place during the hearing on the merits of the complaint. Therefore, I will not require the Commission to amend its Statement of Particulars.”

The latitude of judicial chicanery contained in this ruling borders on the incredulous and demands of me a further degree of outspoken protest and rebuke toward the three associated parties involved in this complaint.

(more…)

[Editor’s Note: The image above was the logo for the Quesnel Multicultural Society which was formed back in 1983. The design was by a local graphic artist by the name of Jason Curtis who was a very close friend of mine. I was one of the founding members of this organization. Some people, like those who represent B’nai Brith Canada would rather that I was a founding member of a white supremacist organization or a neo-Nazi organization or some other org that they could then point to and say “Look, we told you so! He’s a racist and an anti-Semite and a hatemonger. See! See! See!”

The following Motion was sent to the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal in response to the Tribunal’s recent ruling on a previous motion of mine regarding the Canadian Human Rights Commission’s tampering with evidence crucial to the complaint case now before the Tribunal. For some as yet unknown reason the Commission is claiming that it doesn’t have in its files the one document which the Complainant Harry Abrams was the MOST vociferous about in his feigned outrage over articles posted on RadicalPress.com that he claims are promoting “hatred toward Jews and/or citizens of Israel.”

The article in question is The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion which can be found at: http://www.radicalpress.com/?page_id=601 This motion makes it clear to the Commission that they are not playing fair in allowing the Commission to attempt to pull the wool over my eyes and the eyes of the public in allowing this obvious miscarriage to continue.

Harry Abrams, in a letter to the Quesnel Cariboo Observer, back in January of 2008 clearly states that he complained of this document to the Commission yet the Commission is trying to say that they don’t have it in their files. Not only that but they’ve been carrying on in a most un-judical manner in parroting the rants of the Zionist B’nai Brith about the terribly and aweful nature of this roadmap of the 20th Century.

It’s difficult for many people to imagine that an organization like this would stoop to such low tactics but when one begins to pull away the veil that that these people hide behind such actions appear to be standard practise within the Canadian “Human Rights” Commissariat.]

——–

MOTION FOR FURTHER DISCLOSURE OF DOCUMENTS FROM COMPLAINANTS ABRAMS AND THE LEAGUE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS OF B’NAI BRITH CANADA
BY EMAIL

Arthur Topham
Pub/Ed
The Radical Press
Box 4633 Barkerville Hwy
Quesnel, B.C. V2J 6T8
Email: radical@radicalpress.com  

June 9,  2009

Nancy Lafontant
Registry Officer
Canadian Human Rights Tribunal
Nancy.Lafontant@chrt-tcdp.gc.ca

Dear Nancy Lafontant,

RE: Harry Abrams and the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada v. Arthur Topham and the RadicalPress.com
File Number: T1360/9008

The enclosed motion is in regard to the June 2, 2009 email letter from the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal containing Tribunal member Karen Jensen’s decision with respect to my motion (1) of April 22, 2009, to rescind Daniel Poulin’s denial of further disclosure of documents.

In her decision Tribunal member Jensen makes two relevant statements which bear upon this current motion:

The first, with respect to the Commission’s statement that “because of its very nature as one of the most notorious anti-Semitic pieces of literature ever created; there should be no need to have a party disclose it”, Jensen states, “The parties are reminded that they are subject to an ongoing duty to disclose all documents in their possession that are arguably relevant to the case whether anti-Semitic or not.”

Jensen’s second statement concerns the Commission’s avowed position that it does not possess the contentious document known as The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion and therefore cannot be expected to disclose it in its Statement of Particulars as requested by the Respondent.

In her ruling, Jensen states, “”However, if a document is not in a party’s possession, it cannot be disclosed. I take Commission counsel’s word that the Commission is not in possession of the document entitled “Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion”.

What this ruling establishes thus far, regarding my motion of April 22, 2009, is that the Tribunal is taking the “word” of Commission counsel that the Commission doesn’t possess said document but that if any “arguably relevant” document is in the possession of any of the parties it is their “duty” to disclose it.

(more…)

THE ZUNDEL TRIAL & FREE SPEECH
By Douglas Christie, B.A., L.L.B.
February 25, 1985

                  DOUGLAS CHRISTIE, B.A., L.L.B.
__________________________________________________________

[EDITOR’S NOTE: In the Introduction to this small booklet published by C-FAR back in 1985, then President of the Canadian Association for Free Expression, Daryl Reside, wrote:

“In this booket, C-FAR’s Canadian Issues Series is publishing excerpts from defence lawyer Doug Christie’s spirited summation to the jury at the Ernst Zundel trial. This summation was delivered February 25, 1985.

Zundel had been charged under Section 177 of the Criminal Code for having knowingly published false news that was likely to be injurious to the public good. In his ringing defence, Christie seeks to establish: 1) that credible reasons existed for much of what Zundel published; that is, he had justification and arguments for his point of view; 2) that he sincerely believed what he wrote and, therefore, did not knowingly publish falsehoods; and 3) that  a diversity of opinions, however controversial they may be, is vital to a democracy and in no way harms the public good. Threading its way throughout the entire summation is Christie’s passionate view that, right or wrong, a man must be permitted to search for the truth and express his point of view.

 It is this fierce commitment to principle and to liberty that makes this summation an important historical document…. It should also be noted that Zundel nowhere advocated illegal or violent acvtions in the two pamphlets in which he was accused of violating Section 177.”

It is now going on 25 years, a quarter of a century, since Doug Christie gave this summation to the jury in February of 1985. In the interim period the forces of censorship and repression have been successful in punishing Ernst Zundel to the max and he now sits in a dungeon in Zionist-occupied Germany and has been jailed for over six years already for having committed the gravest crime of the 20th Century: Speaking the truth.

Obviously the battle to end censorship is far from over. In my own case with these same Zionist Jew forces working through B’nai Brith Canada’s League for “Human Rights”, we see their relentless and calculated designs continuing to unfold before the public’s now awakening eyes. The war for freedom of speech continues.]

                 DOUG CHRISTIE’S SUMMATION TO THE JURY IN 1985

Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, it’s my role as counsel, to address you now and speak to you about the position of the defence. My first observation is that probably never before in the history of your country, have twelve people had to grapple with a more all-encompassing and serious issue than you will have to deal with. When you have finished your deliberations, in all probability your country will be made different, for as long as you and I will live, by the decision that you will make here about the most serious issues that confront any citizen in a free society.

You have spent seven weeks examining the evidence in one of the most wide-scoped cases in the history of Canadian jurisprudence. I said at the beginning, and I repeat to you now, that this is a case that should never have been before a court of law in a free society because it is an issue upon which courts will have no of difficulty in addressing and dealing with. If you have a clear understanding of the role of freedom in a free society, this may never have to happen again, because a clear indication that we permit and tolerate debate and points of view we may not agree with from a jury of twelve ordinary citizens will be the strongest indication to every politician in this country that we are not subject to the pressures of groups dictating ideas and determining how other people will think, act, and speak.

I suggest to you now that what you have heard in these seven weeks is a lot more information on the subject of the book, Did Six Million Really Die?, than you or I might ever have thought at first was likely to occur. I suggest that we have all learned something in this process. Tolerance, is indeed, one of the things that you have learned by hearing another side to a point that we always thought was so clear and so simple. But to everything we know in life, there are two sides, and many more quite often, and nobody, no matter how well informed or how expert, has all the truth, or ever will.

It should be for the law to determine the extent of debate in a free society. It shouldn’t be forced upon judges and courts to decide what is the truth about some historical belief. It’s nobody’s fault in this room that we are here. It is the duty of every one of us to do our duty as we are, lawyers, judges, jurors, but really it was a wrong political decision to bring before you and me the duty to examine history 40 years old to determine where the truth lies. It is a question that never should have been here. But having been placed in this position, we must deal with it, and we must deal with it to preserve important values in our society.

The first and most important value is the freedom to debate, the freedom to think, the freedom to speak and the freedom to disagree. This prosecution, has already had a very serious effect on those freedoms. If it were to result in a conviction, I suggest to you that a process of witch-hunting would begin in our society where everyone who had a grievance against anyone else would say “Uh-huh, you are false, and I’ll take you or pressure somebody else to take you to court and force you to defend yourself.” Even though our society says, as it always has, in this and every other charge, the burden’s on the Crown, the burden to prove every ingredient is on the Crown, the burden to prove that the thing is false is on the Crown, where does the accused stand? He’s here. He’s been here like you, at his own expense for seven weeks and whatever may become of this case, he’s already paid a very high price for the belief that he had the right to speak what he believed to be the truth.

(more…)

The real political advisers who are directing MP Harper’s Con-serve-Israel government
_________________________________________________________________________

[Editor’s Note: Mr. Rogers is an octogenarian with the political perspicacity of a wise Elder.

There was a time when cultures respected the words of their Elders as is still traditionally so in Native American circles.

Maybe it’s time we once again began paying homage to those who have the courage to speak out in defense of their country when even to do so is deemed to be politically incorrect by some.

I, for one, hold Grenville’s advice in the deepest of respect and admiration and thus would admonish other Canadians who believe in their country and its prized possessions of freedom of speech and political and spiritual sovereignty to do as he has done. Speak out! Voice your opinions without fear and with conviction and sincerity and the knowledge that what you are doing WILL have a positive effect upon others. If we are to ever regain our footings as an independent and free country and repossess our respect and our integrity then we MUST face our enemies who, from within, are hell-bent on destroying all that Canada once was that made her great and glorious.

Please pass this vitally important letter on to as many concerned Canadians as you can think of.]

————-

Mr. Irving R. Gerstein, CFO
Conservative Party of Canada Fundraiser
Irving R GERSTEIN irving_gerstein@conservativefund.ca

Dear Mr Gerstein:

Mr. Gerstein, I am very concerned about the future of my country, and the direction in which our current Prime Minister is forcing us to go.

In good conscience, I cannot, and therefore will not longer support a party or government that does not act in the best interests of Canada and Canadians, a government which supports terrorism, as does the CPC under its present leader.  The party and its leader practice deceit and hypocrisy, and act in secrecy. I am convinced that not one single Canadian really trusts this leader or government, or Mr. Ignatieff or Mr. Layton. Integrity, at every level, is conspicuous by its complete and utter absence.

Mr. Harper has proven to be a dictator, not a leader of a democracy, which Canada pretends to be. Canada was, at one time in the distant past, close to being a democracy.  Canada has never been a democracy.

Canada is defintely not the “Free and Democratic” country that our erstwhile leader(s) trumpet it to be. We certainly do not have “Freedom of Expression for all” and we are demonstrably not democratic. Canadians live under the most powerful dictatorship in the world. Canada’s PM Harper has placed Canada in the deadly vortex of the doomed “USS Titanic”. He will not be a captain that goes down with his ship. Mr. Harper also has clearly demonstrated that he now worships at the Trinitarian Synagogue (Israel, Judaism, Zionism)., the central dogma of which is the gospel of a sacred holocaust.

Do you get that strange feeling of being surrounded by foreign interest groups?
__________________________________________________________________________

The leader and party have declared support for a particular religion, Judaism, over all other religions. This is odious, especially in light of the supremacist teachings of the most holy book of Judaism, the Babylonian Talmud.

PM Harper, as does each puppet US President, takes his cue and orders from the Israel Lobby.

President Ariel Sharon was very blunt, straightforward and truthful, when, on 3 October 2001, he told Mr. Shimon Peres, as reported on Kol Yisrael radio, that “We, the Jewish people, control America, and the Americans know it.”

Mr. Sharon’s complete statement to Mr. Shimon Peres is: “Every time we do something, you tell me America will do this and will do that … I want to tell you something very clear: Don’t worry about American pressure on Israel.  We, the Jewish people, control America, and the Americans know it.”

Menachim Begin, Former Prime Minister of Israel, declared:

“Our race is the Master Race.
We are divine Gods on this planet.
We are as different from the inferior races as they are from insects.
Compared to our race, other races are beasts and animals, cattle at best.
Other races are considered as human excrement.
Our destiny is to rule over the inferior races.
Our earthly kingdom will be ruled by our leader with a rod of iron.
The masses will lick our feet, and serve us as our slaves.”

I find these statements most disturbing, especially in light of PM Harper’s total commitment to Israel and to the defense of Judaism.  Perhaps you are similarly concerned.

B’nia Brith International - secret society of Zionists hiding
behind Canada’s infamous Section 13(1) gag laws
___________________________________________________________________
Mr. Harper is the most dangerous PM that Canada has ever had. Deceitfully following in the footsteps of his predecessors as regards the NAU (North American Union). He professes to be an economist, yet has no idea of, let alone intention of using the Bank of Canada to finance true infrastructure, and the maintenance of existing true infrastructure.

He, all by his dictatorial self, commits billions of the taxpayers’ hard-earned dollars to military equipment and foreign policy misadventures. But he never tells Canadians where that money comes from. He is mortgaging our great-grandchildren’s lives. He could and should, but will not use the BOC (Bank of Canada) for true infrastructure  projects that benefit Canada and Canadians.

Please convey these concerns and the warnings implicit in them, to PM Harper. Thank you.

Respectfully,

Grenville Rogers
grogers@vianet.ca

[Editor’s Note: The following letter to Ms. Cohen is in response to her article of May 19th, 2009 in the National Post. (Please see bottom of this page for the url and the story.)

It’s a good start both for her and for the Zionist-controlled National Post. While there’s no good reason to be hopeful that either of them are serious about initiating any form of open debate on either Zionism or the domestic and foreign policies of the state of Israel, Ms. Cohen’s critique of the Canadian Jewish Congress and B’nai Brith Canada does cut to the quick and on the surface at least exposes the growing dichotomy that appears to exist between these pro-Zionist lobbyists and the remainder of Canada’s Jewish population. For whatever reasons  Jews like Ms. Cohen are speaking out finally and stating their dissatisfaction with the manner in which these pressure groups attempt to speak for all Jews while at the same time they use their inordinate and powerful influence to censor the rest of Canadians whose views they deem inimical to their own interests.

Ms. Cohen’s revelations regarding the Harper government’s blatant patronage toward orgs like the CJC are also quite revealing, especially I would imagine, for the majority of grassroots Conservative supporters who voted unanimously back in 2008 to rid this country of Section 13(1) of the CHR Act and strip the CHR Commission of its powers to censor free speech and the Internet.]

—————–

May 21, 2009
Dear Ms. Cohen,

I’m sure that by now you are sufficiently swamped with a backlog of responses to your challenging and impenitent critique of Canada’s foremost players in the censorship game but nonetheless I must add my comments as well.

As one non-Jewish Canadian who is being directly impacted by B’nai Brith Canada due to a Sec. 13(1) complaint launched against myself and my website http://www.radicalpress.com by this foreign lobbyist group, see http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=821 CHRC Complaint Against RadicalPress.com from Harry Abrams and B’nai Brith Canada, November 20, 2007, I can honestly say that your concerns about their methods of addressing issues of “hate” and “anti-Semitism,” etc. are both welcome and sorely needed.

For the most part I can only concur with your assessment of CJC and BBC although I would call you on one point in your article where you tend to tow the same party line as these Zionist lobbyists, that being your misunderstanding of Hamas.

Why Laura, given your purported awareness of current affairs, would you use the term “stealth normalization” to describe what very simply and honestly should be called the “open recognition” of the fact that Hamas is/was the democratically and duly elected government of the Palestinian people of Gaza?

Seeing as how internationally it is an historically recognized fact; one unfortunately which the governments of Israel, the USA, (and, deplorably) Canada have failed to come to terms with for blatant political reasons and have thus deigned to foster the erroneous deception that somehow Hamas is either of the two misconceptions which you have suggested in your article, I would think that you would acknowledge this reality and not add to the misconceptions already introduced into Canadian jurisprudence by the very forces you are attempting to correct in your fine article.

(more…)

http://theuglytruth.wordpress.com/2009/05/20/israel-wants-prison-for-those-recognizing-the-palestinian-holocaust-as-jewish-groups-remain-silent/
Israel Wants Prison For Those Recognizing the Palestinian Holocaust–Jewish Groups Remain Silent

May 20, 2009

By Mark Glenn
Correspondent
American Free Press Newspaper
www.americanfreepress.net

Psycho Israeli IDF threatening a non-chosenite bringing AID to Palestinians
__________________________________________________________________________

“And the LORD spake unto Moses saying, “Speak unto the children of Israel, and say unto them the following–When ye are passed over the Jordan river into the land of Canaan, ye shall drive out all the inhabitants of the land from before you, and destroy all their pictures, and destroy all their molten images, and tear down all their high places…And ye shall dispossess the inhabitants of the land, and dwell therein, for I have given you the land to possess it…But if ye will not drive out the inhabitants of the land from before you; then it shall come to pass, that those which shall remain shall be pricks in your eyes and thorns in your sides and shall vex you in the land wherein ye dwell…”

Book of Numbers 33:50-56

In the latest coughing fit laying bare the sickness of soul infecting and guiding the very existence of the Jewish state, one of Israel’s largest political parties has introduced a bill in the Knesset outlawing freedom of speech when it comes to commemorating the other Holocaust about which no one seems to know anything, meaning what was done to the Palestinians 60+ years ago by the Jews in an event known as “al Nakbah”.

Introduced by MK Alex Miller of Israel Beiteinu (”Our Land Israel“) the bill is set for deliberation this week in a Knesset dominated by radical, messianic, violence-prone members of both the aforementioned IB party and Benjamin Netanyahu’s Likud. In the interest of covering up and then “wiping off the map” of history Israel’s 6-decade legacy of racism, genocide and terrorism against the Palestinian people, the law is but one more manifestation of what is now the all-too-typical Judeo-centric paradigm so much a part of the way Jews see themselves in relation to the rest of the world’s peoples ever since the days of Abraham and Moses.

In effect, the law criminalizes any publicly-demonstrated mourning surrounding the event taking place 61 years ago when as many as 750,000 Palestinians–Christian and Muslim alike–were “persuaded” by Jewish thugs working for terrorist organizations such as Irgun and the Stern Gang to succumb to a pre-planned program of ethnic cleansing by relocating themselves to all the luxury, opulence and comfort of tented outdoor refugee camps scattered throughout Gaza, Jordan, the West Bank and Lebanon.

(more…)

http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/tyranny2.htm#The%20Hidden%20Tyranny

The Harold Wallace Rosenthal Interview: The Hidden Tyranny (1976) Part 2

UNPLUG, TURN OFF, TUNE OUT – USE THE INTERNET & START THINKING!
__________________________________________________________________________

The Hidden Tyranny
Part Two

“Most Jews do not like to admit it, but our god is Lucifer.”

The above is an exact quote of Harold Wallace Rosenthal, former top Administrative Aide to the then Senator Jacob Jayits, who was since defeated in the 1980 election.

I, Walter White, Jr., for the past 17 years Director and Editor of the monthly conservative publication WESTERN FRONT, was told about Mr. Rosenthal’s boastings around Washington, D.C., and I was encouraged to meet with him and to interview him (for a fee).

Mr. Rosenthal had stated publicly that the Jews will completely dominate throughout the entire world — and that they control every facet of political life in America and every aspect of the communication media. (Mr. R’s emphasis).

Eventually Mr. Rosenthal and l were brought together, at which time I interviewed him privately and taped said interview with Mr. Rosenthal’s knowledge and consent. During the lengthy meeting Mr. Rosenthal became impatient, rude and vulgar (all of which is recorded on the tape) and he sought the balance of his fee before I had concluded my questioning.

Since the entire interview was so lengthy, in 1977 we released and published only the first portion under the same title as above “THE HIDDEN TYRANNY.” Copies of this manuscript (Part I) have been sought by people from all around the globe. We now release the balance of the taped interview as Part Two. Although I do not wish to digress, an Eastern analyst has told me that “The Hidden Tyranny” manuscript (Part I) has had a pass-on readership of 3.5%. Thus, if true, the manuscript (Part I) has been read by more than 7 MILLION people. When this final portion (Part Two) begins circulating, its impact may be even greater. It depends upon you, the reader.

Before any agreement was reached between us, I had established with Mr. Rosenthal that he would answer an unlimited number of questions with complete honesty and to the best of his ability. It was because of this understanding that I took issue with Mr. Rosenthal during the final stages of the interview and accused him of not being honest with me as it related to his response to my question: “Do you have knowledge of WHEN and WHY the story began about the Jews being God’s chosen people?” That is when he said in part: “Most Jews do not like to admit it, but our god is Lucifer — so I wasn’t lying — and we are his chosen people. Lucifer is very much alive.”

As this goes to press, we still seek a governmental body to investigate Harold Rosenthal’s allegations. My dictionary conveys such allegations as “TREASON.”

We now pick up after a dispute during which the tape recorder has been turned off.

(more…)

http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/tyranny1.htm#The%20Hidden%20Tyranny
The Harold Wallace Rosenthal Interview: The Hidden Tyranny (1976) Part 1

UNPLUG, TURN OFF, TUNE OUT – USE THE INTERNET & START THINKING!

___________________________________________________________________________

INTRODUCTION

This article contains the text of a most revealing and shocking interview of a Jew by the name of Harold Rosenthal, which was conducted in 1976, by a concerned patriot, a Walter White, Jr.. Mr. Rosenthal, an influential Jew learned in the Jewish ways and involved in the workings of government in Washington, D.C., explained the Jewish involvement and cause of the major problems we face today.

Rosenthal, in exposing certain aspects of the ‘inner invisible world of Jewry’, revealed the modes and tactics Jews have used in destroying Christian civilization and covertly attaining control over our lives and governments. The result has been a ‘hidden tyranny’ upon us like the tyranny waged against the Saints by the red beast system of Revelation referred to as ‘Mystery Babylon’.

But how could such a small number of Jews enslave so many people and gain such an overwhelming control over their governments, especially without their being aware of it? The answer to this may be found in Christ’s parable of the unjust steward, which represents Jewry. They are able to prevail in the world despite their ungodly ways because of their cunning and shrewd ways. As Christ said “For the children of this world are in their generation wiser than the children of light.” (Luke 16:8)

In other words, the Jew, with his worldly mind set, is wiser than God’s Christian people. When you read the words of Mr. Rosenthal the reality of this statement will come to light. This problem was so prevalent and important for us to overcome that Christ had instructed us to “be wise as serpents“. (Matthew 10:16)

America and the world is now covered in political, economic, moral and social problems which need to be acted upon by Christian people. As Edmund Burke stated: “The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.” But before we can properly act we need a proper (not just a superficial) understanding of the problem. This article will help provide the reader with that understanding.

(more…)

B’NAI BRITH & THE CANADIAN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION – CENSORING FOR ZION

[Editor’s Note: As the legal events of Canada’s latest “Hate Crimes” case involving B’nai Brith Canada and RadicalPress.com ‘creep in their petty pace from day to day’ toward another Tribunal hearing Show Trial, each new exchange between the Canadian Human Rights Commission (CHRC) and myself reveals the increasing collusion between an organization purported to be “serving the public interest rather than the interests of the complainant” and the Jewish foreign lobbyist group known as B’nai Brith Canada, a secret society of pro-Zionist zealots whose main purpose in life is to prevent any criticism in Canada of political Zionism or the racist state of Israel.

Nothing thus far in the complaint process illustrates this conspiracy better than the two recent attempts on the part of the Commission to deny its involvement in attempting to fundamentally alter the nature of the original complaint laid against myself and RadicalPress.com – first by denying the existence of crucial documents (The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion) and then by actually trying to change the wording of the official complaint laid against me by the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada so as to eliminate what obviously could prove to be a very embarrassing and incriminating phrase (“and/or citizens of Israel”); one which clearly exposes the true nature of B’nai Brith’s motives in laying the complaint in the first place.

The following response from the CHR Commission plus my reply to them sent via the Tribunal should illustrate, as others before me have also done, the urgent need for a drastic review of this supposedly “Canadian” Human Rights organization; one which has obviously deteriorated over time and through alien influences by anti-Canadian, foreign agencies, into a dangerous, deluded body of political sycophants beholding not to Canada and its democratic freedoms but to the Zionist agents who have infiltrated our federal government and our media over decades and are now calling the shots on crucial issues such as our coveted right to freedom of speech and expression of diverse opinion plus the maintenance of a free, open, uncensored internet.

The two Motions which the Commission responded to can be found can be found at the following urls:

http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=1001
Canadian Human Rights Commission Exhibits Extreme Bias Toward Protocols

http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=1003
Canada’s Commissars of Political Correctness Change Legal Documents to Suit B’nai Brith Canada
Friday, April 24th, 2009

What follows here is the Commission’s response to them and then my response to theirs sent to the Tribunal. Please pass this information along to whomever you feel might benefit from it. Also, please remember that I can always use financial assistance in carrying on this effort to rid the country of Section 13(1). See the Donate button at the top right of my Home Page. Feel free to use it. ]

Arthur Topham
Editor
RadicalPress.com

———————————————

Tribunal : T1360/9008

CANADIAN HUMAN RIGHTS TRIBUNAL BETWEEN:

(more…)

     Watercolor painting of Karls Church in Winter by Adolf Hitler 1912

___________________________________________________________________________

[Editor’s Note:

Henry Makow’s recent articles are showing strong signs of an underlying, not-too-subtle attempt at continuing the longstanding Zionist propaganda campaign of extreme hatred toward the German people plus endless vituperation toward the National Socialist party of former Nazi Germany.

It seems that no matter how hard some Jews try to overcome their own brainwashing regarding the holy hoax commonly known as the “Jewish Holocaust” (and it is harder for Jews than for any other group I believe) there are some who, like Mr. Makow, just cannot bring themselves to the point where accepting such a truth is possible. Instead, as in Henry’s case, he continues to expound upon and support the lie of that event and in doing so paints himself into an unenviable corner; that of yet another agents provocateur coloring his otherwise token samplings of injustice with the usual, ongoing disinformation campaign against the German nation and the German people; a process that first began in earnest in 1933 has never ceased to this day.

Blending strong portions of Illuminati and Freemasonry information with a dab of Zionism and a touch of Rothschild and a sprinkle or two of Satanism to come up with the standard recipe for global hegemony on the part of these assorted groups Henry weaves a fine and captivating tale of intrigue but, alas, one which ultimately exposes him as a double-agent when he throws into his potpourri of conspiracy theories the two ingredients that inevitably separate the wheat of truth from the chaff-leaven of Talmudic Zionist falsehood – those being the standard, ongoing denigration of the German people and Adolf Hitler as the Empire of Evil and the tacit, sanctimonious support for the holocaust lie – the two pillars upon which the faulty Zionist edifice rests.

As Hans Krampe states in his title, “Henry Makow never forgets” – he never forgets to always add more layers of deception to the two lies of the 20th Century that are absolutely necessary for the Zionist Jew Conspiracy to carry on its program for complete world control.

It’s unfortunate that Henry must kowtow in this manner to the Zionists by unwittingly (or wittingly) supporting their heinous program of hatred toward the one nation that had the balls to stand up to the Bolshevik/Zionist/Communist threat to the world. When we consider that he is supposedly under attack by these very same Zionist lobbyists (the Canadian Jewish Congress) who are using the infamous Section 13(1) of the Canadian Human Rights Act to charge him with hate crimes against Jews it becomes almost too incongruous to imagine that he would allow himself to fall into the trap of emulating his oppressors and their insidious propaganda.

He was so close to breaking free of their mind-control programs; so close to ridding himself of an unnecessary lie bequeathed to all Canadians by the Zionist-controlled media; so close to discovering the truth behind the Zionist lie. So close…but not close enough Henry. And so, with a sad heart, and as the old saying goes, “Sorry Henry, close… but no cigar.]

Henry Makow never forgets
A Response to Henry Makow’s recent article, “Bormann Ran Hitler for the Illuminati”

http://www.henrymakow.com/002026.html

By Hans Krampe

May 7, 2009

In the photo with Hitler, isn’t that Henry Makow in profile?

Henry Makow – a Bormann agent?
_____________________________________

I think Henry Makow is an agent of Bormann, whose purpose it is to keep the memory of a devoted Bolshevik Nazi head and shoulders above that of Adi Hitler. Bormann must still be hanging in there, in South America somewhere, pulling Henry’s strings. How old would he be now? 109 or so?!

Hitler must’ve been not only an evil illuminati toy, but a successful guinea pig of a soviet style MKULTRA treatment (a “fact” still classified and buried in the Kremlin, but Henry has an inkling anyway), programmed and remote controlled. . . by Bormann. . . according to Makow’s instructive ruminations. Didn’t the Nazis invent brainwashing? Or may be they were all guinea pigs too and the illuminati made them invent it for themselves!

         John F. Kennedy

_____________________________

“Hitler… one of the most significant figures who ever lived”

~ President J.F. Kennedy

“Hitler will emerge from the hatred that surrounds him now as one of the most significant figures who ever lived…
He had a mystery about him in the way that he lived and in the manner of his death that will live and grow after him.
He had in him the stuff of which legends are made.”

~ John F. Kennedy,
President of the
United States of America

Jewess Gertrude Stein, Nobel Peace Laureate, recommended that Adolf Hitler be given the Nobel Peace prize. A self-hating Jew?
___________________________________________________________________________

Apparently, the illuminati seem to have paid for everything the Nazis did; like: from national bankruptcy and over 6 million unemployed to full employment and a booming economy in three years, free medicare, free education right thru university, over 1.2 million affordable and extremely attractive family homes (coddling their favorite mass murderers), the 8 hour workday, Sundays off, 21 days paid holidays a year for workers, paid maternity leave for pregnant women and young mothers, maternity spas, over 4000 new kindergartens, holiday resorts for children, luxury liners on which workers could go on two week cruises for less than 170 marks, regular symphony orchestra performances in factories, vivisection outlawed, environmental standards Henry can only dream of, even today, the Autobahn, the Volkswagen, a low cost and high standard of living etc., when the rest of the world could only think of war as a measure of ending the depression. . . and all this with no natural resources to speak of, no gold reserves and nothing but hostility surrounding the country. . . except for the illuminati. Oh, and the Zionists; mustn’t forget those.

Hitler’s Volkswagen
_________________________

It had to be a short state of grace, granted to the condemned before their execution by the illuminati, who kept the cost of living low and the standard of living high in the Third Reich out of sheer cynical malice. How else could the Nazis have managed, led by clueless and treacherous Adolf?? It’s all nice and evil, no doubt! Slave labour, plain as day, has been their key to success. Henry will be sure to unearth the necessary data and interconnect things for us, you know, cross the Ts and dot the Is.

We mustn’t forget the holocaust! It happened, as Henry would no doubt agree. We just can’t prove it, because the stupid Russians won’t release the files that would. They sure hung the right guys for Katyn, though, unless anyone wants to deny that too.

Auschwitz! A sheer horror show of swimming pools, soccer fields, a 40 000 volume library, a theatre, 12 different orchestras, a state of the art hospital and dental clinic run by Jewish doctors, a maternity ward, a kindergarten, university education classes, a state of the art community kitchen, brick dormitories, a post-office, an inmate run police, a jail, a brothel; and work, lots of it, WITH PAY. And let’s not forget INVISIBLE GAS CHAMBERS. And thousands of babies burned alive in massive ditches filled to the brim with ground water. Elie Wiesel saw it all himself and - doing Louis Kilzer one better - he got a Nobel Peace Prize for writing the book “Night” about it. That should qualify it as an astute first hand account. I mean, it won the top pooba of a prize, right? They even made it into a movie. So it’s got to be true, even more so than Kilzer’s. Only problem is, nobody who knows anything about Auschwitz believes a word in it. But at least he makes the Nazis look agreeably bad, which should compensate amply for zero truth. Perhaps Henry can help us here to debunk Wiesel’s detractors.

Auschwitz – still stands complete with brick housing facilities and swimming pool.
___________________________________________________________________________

Today, thanks to guys like Henry, we “know”, the fancy stuff in Auschwitz (typical German deviousness) was just camouflage, you understand, to make the horror look normal for the International Red Cross and the catholic priests who were there from beginning to end but aren’t allowed to sing.

You don’t believe it? Ask Henry, he will find a way to prove it. . . sort of. And if he can’t, guys like Louis Kilzer will jump into the breech. You can trust old Louis, he’s got it all figured out. The main thing is that the Nazis were bad, bad, BAD. . . and getting worse by the minute.

Henry, we’ve got the message! You can relax now; and just tell the Canadian Jewish Congress to lay off. It’s obvious that you’re going to behave from now on.

Menachem Begin
_____________________

“Our race is the Master Race. We Jews are divine gods on this planet. We are as different from the inferior races as they are from insects. In fact, compared to our race, other races are beasts and animals, cattle at best. Other races are considered as human excrement. Our destiny is to rule over the inferior races. Our earthly kingdom will be ruled by our leader with a rod of iron. The masses will lick our feet and serve us as our slaves.”  Prime Minister of Israel, Menachim Begin (left), in a speech to the Knesset, quoted in Amnon Kapeliouk, ‘Begin and the “Beasts”, New Statesman, 25 June 1982.

Noam Chomsky
___________________

“If the Nuremberg laws were applied, then every post-war American president would have been hanged” -Professor Noam Chomsky

Adolf Hitler & Young Friends
______________________________________________________

Hitler’s proposals for a European pacification plan for Europe were delivered to the Geneva League of Nations. His proposals included:

*    prohibition of the dropping of gas, poisonous or incendiary bombs
*    prohibition of dropping any bombs outside fighting fronts
*    prohibition of artillery weapons over 12 miles from battle zones

“Germany will be perfectly ready to disband her entire military establishment and destroy the small amount of arms remaining to her, if the neighboring countries will do the same thing with equal thoroughness. Germany is entirely ready to renounce aggressive weapons of every sort if the armed nations, on their part, will destroy their aggressive weapons within a specified period, and if their use is forbidden by an international convention. Germany is at all times prepared to renounce offensive weapons if the rest of the world does the same. Germany is prepared to agree to any solemn pact of non-aggression because she does not think of attacking anybody but only of acquiring security” ~ Adolf Hitler
——–

Hans Krampe is a former feature writer for The Radical, a monthly tabloid pubished by The Radical Press from 1998 to 2002. He can be reached at Hans Krampe hjk@quesnelbc.com

911 & Sec. 13(1): Coincidence or Collusion?

By Arthur Topham

April 18, 2009

“The reason men are silenced is not because they speak falsely, but because they speak the truth. This is because if men speak falsehoods, their own words can be used against them; while if they speak truly, there is nothing which can be used against them - except force.”

~ John “the Birdman” Bryant 1943 - 2009

There are important reasons why the 9/11 Truth movement must be discredited in the eyes of the still bewitched mainstream public. One of the more far-reaching ones is the connection between the Israeli Mossad (their official/unofficial spy agency), the insiders within the US administration and the resulting legislation that followed in the aftermath of the premeditated attack upon the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001.

For the USA, it represented the labour pains purposely induced by a traitorous element within its own government designed to birth the infamous Homeland Security legislation and justify its planned war against Afghanistan and Iraq plus the “War on Terror”. For Canada, that act of deliberate mass murder (better named a mini-holocaust considering the circumstances), had a different, although comparable direct and immediate benefit for the same criminal element now embedded within our nation’s social and political infrastructures whose similar purpose is to undermine Canada’s Constitution, Bill of Rights and our Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

I’m referring here of course to those Zionist Jew lobby groups within Canada who consistently and systematically seek to increase their stranglehold over the country’s judiciary and government leaders in order to fulfill their own separate, alien and seditious objectives which are to adulterate and manipulate Canada’s federal and provincial statutes in order that the courts, be they judicial or quasi-judicial, may then inhibit and pervert our traditional rights and freedoms; ones fundamental to the harmonious, peaceful functioning of our democratic way of life.

I don’t make these allegations lightly nor do I make them without reason or evidence. I make them because they are a reality in today’s world of politics not only in Canada but in the USA and throughout the vast majority of the world’s nations (if not, if fact, all of them).

In the example of Canada we are now facing the same crisis that exists in another of the former British colonies, Australia, where in the past days we’ve witnessed the blatant ruling by their supreme court which found Dr. Fredrick Toben, owner of the Adelaide Institute website, guilty of 28 counts of contempt, all connected to that country’s legal bondage to the Jewish lobbyists who have successfully infiltrated and taken over the former democratic nation’s rights to freedom of speech and expression and introduced, (better, substituted) their Talmudic Noahide “laws” for those which once were based on British Common Law. As such they’ve been deliberately deceived by these Jewish lobbyists into accepting the erroneous beliefs of the Zionist Jews that to question aspects of history, specifically the scientifically unproven, mythical 6 Million Lie about an exclusive “Jewish” holocaust committed during World War II, must constitute a criminal act, one warranting both incarceration and massive financial punishment.

(more…)

Dr. Fredrick Toben with Lady Michelle Renouf in London after
escaping the clutches of the Talmudic Zio-bloodhounds in the fall of 2008
________________________________________________________________

Toben Down. Who’s Next?

By Arthur Topham

April 16, 2009

This is one of those articles that I find SO difficult to write and remain civil while doing so. Being in the midst of a legal battle myself with these Talmudic Tyrants of Tyranny out to control every aspect of human life and consciousness in their mad attempt to take over the world I find the usual protocol of being courteous to these maniacal, mind-controllers practically, as well as esthetically, impossible to adhere to. So if you’re not up to a bit of cussin’ and politically incorrect pronouncements then best you switch back to FOX or CNN.

When I see a fellow Truth Warrior like Dr. Toben, trapped by their perfidious web of ‘legal’ lies and deceit and knowing only too damn well their mendacious motives for silencing men and women who have the courage of their own knowledge and convictions to stand up to these savage, pseudo-savants of sophistry and deception, a primal sense of outrage, so deep and so strong, wells up from within me and all I want to do is search the keyboard for the button that reads SCREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEAM!!!! and press on it with all my might until the intensity of the anger and the utter disgust finally abates.

True to form the Zionist media dogs lap up all the usual Zionese/Legaleese language of their masters and vomit it forth via their newspapers and out from their Ziovision screens around the world as if it is going to reinforce the obvious, blatant lies of which they are so desperately attempting to sustain. Dr. Toben “Holocaust denier” “guilty” of “criminal contempt” and “defying orders”  to stop publishing “racist material” on his website ad nauseum.

The Zionist owned and controlled “Jewdiciary” of Australia have “held” that Fredrick doesn’t accept the Zionist version of what the Talmudic Jews have mandated as “freedom of speech” and “history” so they have found him “guilty” of “28 counts of contempt”. Thus Jeremy Jones (a good kosher Jewish handle if ever I saw one), former president of the Executive Council of Australian Jewry, the Orwellian weasel who first launched the complaint against Mr. Toben back in 1996, is now smirking to his Talmudic brethren and telling them how Australia is now firmly in the grasp of the infamous Noahide “Laws” of the Talmudic Lubavichers once and for all.

(more…)

Douglas Christie, Canada’s “Battling Barrister” Challenging Sec. 13 of the CHR Act
_________________________________________________________________

2(b) or not to be? B’nai Brith’s Challenge to Canada’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms

By Arthur Topham
April 1, 2009

In 1982, following passing by the British Parliament, Canada’s Constitution Act, 1982 became the official law of the land.

PART I of the Act became known as the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Its stated purpose was to ensure protection for all Canadians of certain basic rights and freedoms deemed necessary and essential to maintain our free and democratic society.

Section 1 of the Act was the Guarantee of our Rights and Freedoms and Section 2 was the list of our Fundamental Freedoms.

Section 2 states: Everybody has the following fundamental freedoms (as outlined in four sub-sections known as a, b, c and d).

Section 2(b) reads:

“Freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication;”

Twenty three years later, on November 25, 2005, due to specific amendments made to Section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act in the immediate aftermath of 9/11/2001 – amendments that for the most part were hastily and prematurely inserted in conjunction with Canada’s Anti-Terrorism Act of November 2001 – Marc Lemire, the owner and webmaster of www.freedomsite.org and his lawyer Barbara Kulaszka were forced by circumstance to challenge efforts which they deemed inimical to the fundamental freedoms contained in Section 2(b).

This was the beginning of the first Constitutional challenge* to the notorious Section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act, likely the most specious and controversial piece of legislation to have ever been surreptitiously foisted upon an unwary public.

The objective of the Lemire challenge was to expose not only the unconstitutionality of Section 13 of the Act, one that allowed special interest lobby groups (both foreign and domestic) to use said legislation for partisan political purposes in order to censor writers and publishers on the Internet but also to show how Section 54 of the same Act was being used to impose inordinate fines on anyone found guilty of perpetrating the so-called “hate crimes” with which Section 13 deals with and which Section 54 embellishes with dire and arbitrary financial penalties.

It wasn’t until nearly three years later and only after two years of hearings (comprising 26 days in all) and 8 interveners and 11 witnesses that the case finally reached its conclusion in a three day hearing lasting from September 15th to the 17th in Oakville, Ontario, Canada.

One of the interveners in the case on the side of Lemire was the internationally recognized human rights and freedom of speech lawyer Douglas Christie of Victoria, B.C. On the second day of the hearing in the afternoon Mr. Christie, known around the world as the “Battling Barrister” stood before the podium and gave his long awaited summation. What follows is a record taken from Marc Lemire’s website.

“This is a most important decision. It will determine who controls the media in Canada.”

“I have been the counsel for John Ross Taylor, Ernst Zundel and James Keegstra and I have argued that hate is very hard to define. We see this case as meaning either the beginning of the end of freedom in a real way or the end of the beginning of the reclamation of freedom in this country,” he stated.

“I want to point out the effects of this legislation beyond the particular effects of Marc Lemire’s case,” Mr. Christie explained. “The effect of this legislation is to create a political elite who alone can communicate their views. There is nothing new about this Sec. 13. It has created a bureaucracy that has told us many times here: ‘You don’t get a free pass,’ and we’ve heard it here,” Mr. Christie explained.

“I warned, in Keegstra, that these hate laws were a slippery slope and Sec. 13 makes that slope steeper and more slippery,” the Victoria-based lawyer added.

(more…)

Your Handy Dandy Reference Guide to the CHRC complaint against RadicalPress.com plus the CHR Tribunal process and hearing

Dear Radical Reader,

In the process of preparing some type of index of the related articles, etc surrounding this case for use with the media I decided to put together an easy to use list of urls that one might use to access most of the information pertaining to my case with the CHRC and the upcoming CHR Tribunal hearing.  Hopefully it will be useful for those interested in the outcome of this struggle for freedom of the Internet and for free speech.

If you discover that any of the urls are malfunctioning I would appreciate hearing about it. Thank you.

Shine your Light for Love & Peace & Justice for All,

Arthur Topham
Pub/Ed
The Radical Press
Canada’s Radical News Network
radical@radicalpress.com
http://www.radicalpress.com
“Digging to the root of the issues since 1998”
——————————————————-

RELATED URLS TO CANADIAN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION COMPLAINT (FILE NO: 20071016) AGAINST RADICALPRESS.COM BY HARRY ABRAMS & B’NAI BRITH CANADA

PLUS INFORMATION RELATED TO THE UPCOMING CANADIAN HUMAN RIGHTS TRIBUNAL HEARING (FILE NO: T1360/9006)

CORRESPONDENCE BETWEEN CHRC & RADICALPRESS.COM:

http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=821
CHRC Complaint Against RadicalPress.com from Harry Abrams and B’nai Brith Canada
November 20, 2007

http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=629
Response to Canadian Human Rights Commission by the RadicalPress.com,
January 3, 2008

http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=686
International Support for Radical Press expressed through Letters to Quesnel Cariboo Observer
January 13, 2008

http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=785
Report from CHRC Investigations Division Re: Abrams/B’nai Brith Complaint against RadicalPress.com
August 27, 2008

http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=786
Comments on CHRC Report. Re: Complaint from Harry Abrams and B’nai Brith Canada against RadicalPress.com
September 17, 2008

http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=816
Letter from the CHRC to RadicalPress.com
November 21, 2008

http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=838
B’nai Brith: Beating the anti-Semitic Drum (updated article from Sept. 5, 2005)
By Arthur Topham
December 3, 2008

(more…)

Painting of Mary & Christ Child by a Controversial German artist 1913

______________________________________________

An Open Letter to All Christian Zionists

By Lifeforce

March 10, 2009

Dear Susan:

I have been very slow in responding to your email because I fear that I have provoked you with my commentary about the Zionist control of our government.  That was not my intention.  And if you feel threatened I regret that very much.  My purpose was to warn you.   If you are not aware, you cannot possibly protect yourself from the threat that Zionism poses for all of us.  And things are going to get a lot worse before they get better..

In your message you question my religious convictions.  If you notice in my message,  I never discussed the religious ramifications of this problem. I never once used the term “Jew.”  There is a very good reason for that. Zionism at its core is not about religion.  It is about politics, power and ultimately it is about the struggle for world domination. The conflict between the Arabs and the Israelis is not a religious conflict.  It is a political struggle for the control of the middle east.  Unlike our people, the people of the middle east understand this very well.   But you seem to want to reduce this discourse to the level of religion.   Discussing religion is something I generally avoid, because it is a dead end.  A no win proposition.  But since we apparently cannot escape that notion I will share with you some of my views.    I consider my personal spirituality far more important than man’s organized religion.  Millions have died because of man’s ability and willingness to distort the teachings of the great spiritual masters.  That is true now more  than ever.  Let’s just say that I love God, and I love God’s divine plan more than you can ever know.   I do believe in, and try very hard to FOLLOW,  the teachings of Christ.   I consider him to be the greatest savant and spiritual leader in world history.  Christ taught the world unconditional love, mercy, compassion and forgiveness for everyone —- including your enemies.  He lived and died by that mantra.  When he was being crucified he forgave his murderers. That seems to be the part that Christians have the hardest time remembering. Don’t you think it is  time to start?   In contrast to Christianity the Zionists have a saying:  “Never forgive, and never forget.”  And they don’t.  God’s chosen people?  That said, do you honestly believe that Jesus Christ would approve of what some of the so-called Christian churches are doing—with respect to their support of Zionism and Israel?  Do you think Christ would support the Zionists as they murder innocent Palestinian children.  I don’t think so.   The IDF deliberately targeted toddlers and small children in their latest genocidal attack on the Palestinians.  They consider it a sport to shoot children.  “Only head shots count.” Hundreds of children were shot by Israeli snipers.  When they lay dead they mutilated the bodies by using them for target practice.  One little girl had eighteen bullet holes in her body and her two year old sister, who she was carrying at the time of her death, was shot twelve times.    Do you think this is the kind of behavior that would be practiced by people who are God’s chosen?  I don’t think so.  That kind of behavior is not just evil, it is satanic.

(more…)

What’s Next, “Zionism Denial”?
By Arthur Topham
March 4, 2009

The recent shackling and incarceration of Horst Mahler in Germany over charges of “Holocaust Denial” is the latest example of the degree of absurdity that this trend by the Zionist forces is leading mankind toward.

There is now occurring, worldwide, an ideological war (vaguely masked as a ‘religious’ one) between the forces of darkness and deceit and the forces of light and truth. It’s as simple (and yet, as complex) as that.

Following upon the heels of the other absurdity of this nature, that of Bishop Richard Williamson and the grossness and degree of the attack upon his name and his position within the beleaguered Catholic hierarchy by the Zionist zealot rabbis and their lackeys whose raison d’etre rests upon a professed foundational belief in their false messiah – the Holocaust god – the myth of Sillyness is thus taken to the nth degree of frivolity.

The fact that Zionist Jews everywhere are now, in unison, screaming out their proverbial Molochian chants for Bishop Williamson’s blood and for him to not only recant his early remarks concerning the “Big Six” but to go further in demands he swear an unquestioning obedience and belief in their brash idol of ash, is one more startling illustration of the fact that these Mad Hatters of Holocaustasia will stop at nothing short of absolute obeisance to the object of their perpetual sorrow and worship.

Viewing this recent trend by the Zionist Jews to attack the intellectual challenges brought on by the apostles of common sense who have the audacity and courage to question their self-chosen postulates regarding the “Holocaust” with a barrage of legally restricting legislation specifically designed to thwart not only reason but justice itself, one can only ask the most obvious question – what next?

The answer to that simple and natural query – an outcome of witnessing the historic examples of James Keegstra, and Doug Collins and Malcolm Ross and Ernst Zundel in Canada, Professor Robert Faurisson in France, Germar Rudolf of the USA, Sylvia Stolz, Juergen Graf, Gerd Honsik and Horst Mahler of Germany, historian David Irving of England and Dr. Fredrick Toben of Adelaide Institute in Australia (to name but a few of the more notable figures) – is to be found in the current battle now unfolding in Canada between myself, Arthur Topham and my website RadicalPress.com and the Zionist Jew lobby organization known as the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada.

I am being charged by B’nai Brith Canada under Canada’s Sec. 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act – a vile and specious bit of Orwellian outrage if ever there was one – that uses Canada’s “Hate crimes” laws to suppress and vilify anyone who questions any aspects of either Judaism, the political ideology of Zionism or the policies of the foreign state of Israel.

As crazy and illogical as it might first appear, the actual wording of the charge brought against me and my website is living proof that the Zionists are determined to establish in this “Human Rights” complaint now before the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal, a new and unique precedent that goes beyond even the magnitude of the medieval malfeasance found in their “Holocaust Denial” legislation.

This novel precedent is to be found in the specific wording of the complaint itself which the Canadian Human Rights Commission, in their infinite wisdom, deemed admissible and worthy of holding a Tribunal hearing to debate. Using Section 13(1) and its Interpretation(2),  of the CHR Act, B’nai Brith Canada stated in its complaint to the CHRC:

“The premise of this complaint is a contention that Arthur Topham and Radicalpress.com contrive to promote ongoing hatred affecting persons identifiable as Jews and/or as citizens of Israel.” [bold is mine]

If this “complaint” reaches its planned goal it will firmly establish as law, in the once free nation known as Canada, that no citizen of said country will be able to write anything on the Internet that is critical of the state of Israel – (remembering of course that Israel is a foreign country) – without taking the risk of being charged with committing a “Hate crime” under Canada’s federal Canadian Human Rights Act.

As the world already knows, the essence of Israel, its life-blood, rests upon the ideology known as political Zionism. Without Zionism’s fundamental tenets the state would not, could not, exist as it does in its present form. Logic thus leads one to the obvious conclusion. If it becomes a “Hate crime” in Canada to criticize Israel then to do so make it de facto of the same order of “Holocaust Denial” only in this new instance we would have to refer to it as “Zionism Denial”.

I needn’t burden readers with the endless avenues leading into absurdity that such a precedent would set, not only for Canada but for every nation in which the Zionist Jewish influence has gained currency.

Those of us Canucks here in the trenches battling to stop censorship of the Internet and the repression of freedom of speech are well aware that Canada is the experimental breeding-ground for Zionist legislation which inevitably curtails serious debate of all relevant political issues related to Zionist Jewish influence on western culture and its underlying institutional framework.

All alliteration aside, once they are able to get in to the law books the RadicalPress.com v. B’nai Brith Canada precedent it will open up a plethora of pandemic, pusillanimous and pestilent-stricken precedents the likes of which will make Pandora’s Box appear petite by comparison.

And like all of the poisonous programs designed to control our thoughts and our means of expressing them, this current case, should it prove to be another Zionist victory, will soon wend its way south into the heart of America to then challenge that final bastion of freedom of speech contained in the US Constitution – the 1st Amendment.

The time to stem this stream of Orwellian misery currently building up head in Canada is NOW. The place, CANADA. The method? Kill this serpent of censorship hiding within Sec. 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act by severing its head before yet another false god, in this instance one called “Zionism Denial”, is born from out of the dark depths of Mordor and turns its fierce fangs toward the light bringers with increased vengeance and hatred.

The light will never be overcome by the darkness but only if the people open their eyes to the clear and present danger that Zionism poses to all those who love freedom.
——

To assist in this cause you might write a letter of support for RadicalPress.com and address it to:

Nancy Lafontant
Registry Officer
Canadian Human Rights Tribunal
Nancy.Lafontant@chrt-tcdp.gc.ca

Please refer to File Number: T1360/9008

Please visit http://www.radicalpress.com for more articles and information on this subject.
———–

Arthur Topham is the Publisher and Editor of RadicalPress.com. He lives in central B.C. Canada with his wife and family and has been at the forefront of issues regarding social justice for the past forty years. He can be reached at radical@radicalpress.com

Dedicated to all who value the truth, free speech and are willing to sacrifice themselves on the “Highway of Public Controversy”

Hi Everyone, 

We are very excited to launch this Hard-Hitting, Pro-Family, Pro-Truth Radio show.

Please help us to make it a hit by forwarding this email to your list and then making a date with us tonight on RoadKill Radio!!!  It’s going to be fun and ohhhh so very needed!!!

With great appreciation for all you do!

Kind Regards,

Kari Simpson

————–

YES TODAY!!!!!!

RoadKill Radio Launches Online!!!!!

And You Are Invited!!

Hosts Kari Simpson & Terry O’Neill

Unabashedly Canadian, BOLD with No Apologies and oh yes, one more thing - we are pleased and determined to ensure those “Politically-Incorrect” voices that have been silenced are given an opportunity to be part of the debate and to have your voices heard!!

WHERE:         Listen live -     http://WWW.ROADKILLRADIO.COM

WHEN:          TODAY!!!  Tuesday March 3, 2009 @ 7:30 – 9:30 pm (PST)

CALL IN:        On-air telephone:      (604) 525-4167

EMAIL US:     roadkillradio@live.ca

TOPICS:

– The naughty Pro-Lifers who dared to exercise their right to free speech and have now been charged by the  University of Calgary with trespassing!

–  Polygamy, do we need to say more?….YES!

–  Gay Politics 101 and other Social Injustices – The Corren Agreement