Arthur Topham

January 25th, 2017

Fake News sites come in all sizes, shapes and flavours during these heady days of Alternative vs Zionist media wars. And one of Canada’s top deceptive “Fake News” sites has to be TheRebel.Media run by “Rebel Commander” Ezra Levant, Zionist Jew and self-chosen saviour of Canada’s dumbed down goyim ‘christians’, assorted atheists, Germanophobes and most recently Islamophobes.

Ezra loves to think of himself as Canada’s Number One defender of “Free Speech” and has been active in the free speech movement for a long time. In fact it was the issue of freedom of speech that first brought him to my attention a decade ago when the Zionist Jew lobby organization B’nai Brith Canada first filed a Sec. 13 “hate speech” complaint against me with the Canadian Human Rights Commission in the summer of 2007 and I suddenly found myself the latest member of that exclusive Canadian association known as the “Anti-Semitic, Racist, Jew-hating, Neo-Nazi, Hate-mongerer’s Club.”

Of course I wasn’t alone any longer in my then ongoing struggle to bring forward to the Canadian public the facts surrounding the true nature of political Zionism and the ongoing conspiracy by this Rothschild created Apocalyptic Beast to wreak havoc not only in the desert sands of middle eastern Arab nations but around the globe in their relentless quest to create a new world order under the iron heel of Talmudic totalitarian despotism. As is evident in the graphic below I was now amongst the former luminaries of Canada’s modern-day revisionists who, ahead of me, had already solved the ancient riddle known as “The Jewish Problem.”

Initially, because Ezra Levant had also been accused of a Sec. 13 “hate crime” by an Islamic organization here in Canada prior to my own case, a mutual acquaintance attempted to connect us up in the vain hope that we might work together but Levant’s immediate response was to label me an “anti-Semite” and therefore one of the untouchables.

Since that time I’ve covered a number of Levant’s serpentine adventures in the mainstream media, including the example of when he has used his position on national television back in 2012 to libel and vilify me personally via his former position with Sun News media and his tv show “The Source.”

Levant’s modus operandi is to hoodwink gullible goyim Zionist Christians and other assorted small “c” conservatives, atheists and regular tv watchers and mainstream newspaper readers and fill their minds with hatred toward Muslims and Germans and anyone else who might display the chutzpah to criticize the Zionist ideology or the racist actions of the state of Israel or anything remotely related to enterprises that the Jews have their fingers and their shekels invested in.

A couple of other related articles on this zio-wolf in sheep’s clothing that readers might wish to take a look at are the following:


A recent article by one of Commissar Levant’s lieutenants, the young, pretty naive and zealous Faith Goldy, a self-confessed “fearless journalist and devout Catholic who stands up for family values, freedom, and firearms” titled, FREEDOM TO OFFEND: Support free speech, not sharia! caught my attention as its title obviously calls out to all those who value the God-given right to be able to speak one’s mind openly and freely without fear of the state or some special interest group laying a “hate speech” complaint against you.

In her article, embellished with a glitzy video presentation to enhance her Islamophobic argument, Faith Goldy slams the Liberal government’s “anti-Islamophobia initiative”; one that was brought on by a petition to the government calling “upon the House of Commons to recognize that terrorists are not real Muslims by condemning all forms of Islamophobia, with no exact definition of what they meant by the term.”

Faith was vehemently outraged by the fact that the petition had gained unanimous consent of Canada’s MP’s. She was also incensed by the Liberal’s tacitly implied proposal to introduce further draconian legislation to prohibit Canadians from “offending” Muslims; legislation that would most likely fall into Canada’s current Criminal Code “Hate Propaganda” sections 318 to 320, the very same legislation that the foreign Zionist Jew lobbyist organization B’nai Brith Canada used to indict me back in 2012 under their spurious claim that:

“Roy Arthur TOPHAM, between the 28th day of April, 2011 and the 4th day of May, 2012, inclusive, at or near Quesnel, in the Province of British Columbia, did by communicating statements, other than in private conversation, willfully promote hatred against an identifiable group, people of the Jewish religion or ethnic origin, contrary to Section 319(2) of the Criminal Code.”

Faith sums up her angst with the Liberals by stating:

“In short: The Canadian government is preparing to silence anyone who criticizes Islam.

Their anti-Islamophobia motion (which will, in all likelihood, be voted on during this parliamentary session) resembles a kind of blasphemy law in favour of one preferred religion above all others. If this motion passes, Canadians can be persecuted for expressing any criticism of Islam, even when warranted.

This unfounded anti-Islamophobia legislation flies in the face of our Constitution and its embedded Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

Sharia law and it’s related speech codes are not a reasonable limit on my freedoms.

According to our charter of rights and freedoms — we’re all equal. Every individual (not a belief system or ideology) is equal before and under the law. We all have equal protections and benefit equally from the law.

Muslims do not get special treatment or protections.”

Enter the Bigots and Hypocrites

Allow me now to repeat what I did on my website with Theodore N. Kaufmann’s book, Germany Must Perish! in a satire of it that I titled, Israel Must Perish! and change but a few salient words of what Faith wrote so it now reads:

“In short: The Canadian government is preparing to silence anyone who criticizes Judaism.

Their anti-Semitism motion (which will, in all likelihood, be voted on during this parliamentary session) resembles a kind of blasphemy law in favour of one preferred religion above all others. If this motion passes, Canadians can be persecuted for expressing any criticism of Judaism, even when warranted.

This unfounded anti-Semitic legislation flies in the face of our Constitution and its embedded Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

Talmudic Jew law and it’s related speech codes are not a reasonable limit on my freedoms.

According to our charter of rights and freedoms — we’re all equal. Every individual (not a belief system or ideology) is equal before and under the law. We all have equal protections and benefit equally from the law.

Jews do not get special treatment or protections.”

Now either Goldy the intrepid and fearless journalist is extremely naive when it comes to Canada’s “Hate Propaganda” legislation or else she’s intentionally avoiding the fact that these laws were knowingly and specifically introduced into Canadian jurisprudence by the Jewish lobbyists here in Canada in order to first and foremost protect the Jews and the actions of the foreign state of Israel. There’s no other reasonable explanation for why she would make such a ludicrous statement that the Liberal’s “anti-Islamophobia motion resembles a kind of blasphemy law in favour of one preferred religion above all others.” Canada’s “Hate Propaganda” laws are precisely that; laws that “favour of one preferred religion above all others” and that religion just happens to be Judaism, whether Goldy likes it or not.

Surely, as a Roman Catholic, Faith Goldy must have a very clear understanding that the Catholics and Christians in general certainly don’t warrant any protection under Canada’s current “Hate Propaganda” laws. Canadians are free to criticize, vilify, malign, libel and hate Christians as much as they like. As a Christian I can verify the veracity of this statement. The same goes for any other religion, with the one exception – Judaism – and that’s why the Zionist Jew mainstream media here in Canada has been attacking the Muslims with a vengeance and with impunity ever since Israel and its Mossad secret service, in collusion with the Zionist infested White House in Washington, D.C. and its Zionist controlled CIA, pulled off the greatest caper of the 21 century when they orchestrated 911 and then blamed it on the Muslims in order to justify their planned, pre-emptive wars with any Arab nation not willing to bow down and kiss the ass of either the Zionist state of Israel or its global bully the USA.

If Faith Goldy is the “fearless journalist” that she professes to be then she would display that professed trait by looking fearlessly into the politics of Canada’s media and research the involvement of the Jew lobbyists like B’nai Brith Canada, the former Canadian Jewish Congress and the more recent umbrella org know as the Centre for Israel & Jewish Affairs and the roles they’ve played in corrupting and poisoning Canada’s justice system so that it consistently and inevitably favours only one religion, that of the Jews.

But alas, I fear that this seemingly narrow-minded, glib-tongued Roman Catholic is not about to face the truth about Judaism and its bastard satanic, atheistic son Zionism any more that she’s about to face the truth about Ezra Levant and his goy-seducing “Rebel” disinformation site that she’s now using as a soap box to promote the Zionist agenda of spewing forth endless hatred toward Muslims, all of which is designed with the long range goal of inciting yet another major war between the Christians and the Islamic nations; one that will, as all the wars inevitably do, solely benefit the Jews and their sinister plans for global hegemony.

The double-edged sword

Allow me to conclude this critique of Faith Goldy and Ezra Levant with a general explanation as to why the Zionist Jew media and their lobbyists here in Canada were so fervently opposed to Sec. 13 and its “hate speech” provisions as contained in the Canadian Human Rights Act and why, when that draconian legislation was repealed in 2012, they didn’t then proceed on to ridding the country of the far more dangerous, Orwellian and freedom-denying legislation contained in Sec. 319(2) of the Canadian Criminal Code known as the “Hate Propaganda” laws.

For many years the Jewish lobby groups in Canada used the Sec. 13 legislation to attack anyone who criticized either Israel or its political ideology known as Zionism. Then, the Muslim organizations here in Canada realized that they too could wield this same legislation in order to prohibit the Jew mainstream media from spreading hate and lies about them and so they set out to do just that. They laid complaints against Ezra Levant for publishing the insulting and degrading images of their spiritual leader Mohammad as well as Mark Steyn; two Canadian Jews who had been vilifying and promoting hatred toward the Muslims and their Islam religion for years. On top of that Steyn was a regular contributor at Maclean’s Magazine and suddenly it found itself embroiled in the Sec. 13 “hate speech” complaint. That was when the Zionist Jews in Canada finally saw the light and realized that the sword they’d inserted into the Canadian Human Rights Act right after 911 was double-edged and could be used against them too. Oi veh! they exclaimed. Such a deal! This law has to go. And it did. It took a number of years of promoting it via the Jewish media establishment and on social media and blogs around the country but eventually enough awareness was raised and political pressure applied that the Conservative government under Harper finally buckled under and decided they had to get rid of Sec. 13.

I, like many others, fought long and hard to have the legislation repealed. Of course I had a vested interest in seeing it thrown out. I was being forced to run the gamut of both the Canadian Human Rights Commission and the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal where “Truth” was no defence and the only outcome of appearing before the dreaded Stalinist tribunal was to be found guilty and have one’s rights to freedom of speech squashed along with the strong possibility of incurring exorbitant fines and restrictions on using the internet and ever publishing one’s views again. And I wasn’t alone. There were dozens of others who had already suffered and were still caught up in this vortex of madness that the Zionists had created thanks to their narcissistic, power-crazed delusions of power and grandeur. When the legislation was repealed there was great rejoicing amongst those who had been caught up in the merciless machinations of this Talmudic-driven censorship machine that had been running over our Constitutional and Charter rights for so long.

By the time the repeal occurred I had already come to the conclusions stated above and realized that the chances were not likely that the same forces who had brought to bear enough political and media pressure upon the government to repeal Sec. 13 were now going to do the same for Canada’s “Hate Propaganda” laws. And for obvious reasons. The “Hate Propaganda” laws had taken painstaking years of Jewish lobbying in order to get them implanted in the Criminal Code and it was understood by the Zionists that these laws were their last refuge and defence against having their long-range, secret agenda exposed to the general public on the internet. Without these Bolshevik-inspired laws to stem the inevitable tide of “anti-Semitism” that would automatically and naturally begin to rise once the public began realizing what the bigger picture was all about and their game plan was unravelling on the Internet they knew damn well that in order to keep the gullible goyim in their place and restrict the truth about their conspiracy they had to keep those “Hate Propaganda” laws intact and protected.

No sooner had Sec. 13 been repealed the same B’nai Brith Jewish lobbyists who filed their Sec. 13 complaint against me did an about turn and filed a Sec. 319(2) criminal code “hate complaint” against me in order to perpetuate the harassment and intimidation and legal torture that had finally ceased with the repeal of Sec. 13. When my trial came up in the fall of 2015 none of the former “rebels” and “free speech warriors” who I had worked with on the Sec. 13 campaign were to be found. Former allies in the fight for “freedom of speech” scurried like rats off a sinking ship. The likes of the great “free speech” fighters like Ezra Levant and Mark Steyn suddenly pulled a disappearing act. Others, like Marc Lemire, whose Sec. 13 battle was the final spike driven through the draconian heart of the Sec. 13 legislation and who I had worked tirelessly to assist, were now as silent as lambs when it came to Regina vs Roy Arthur Topham. Mark and Connie Fournier who had run the conservative website and forum known as “Free Dominion” and, ironically, had won the George Orwell Award from Lawyer Doug Christie’s Canadian Free Speech League after labouring for years to have Sec. 13 repealed also faded into the void when the trial of Arthur Topham was reported across the country in the Zionist media. All of my efforts to help them during their tribulations proved fruitless. Instead of standing up for Canada and going the extra mile required in order to destroy these “Hate Propaganda” laws once and for all they chose instead to betray the country and their fellow partisans in favour of Israel, Zionism and Judaism. Hypocrites, one and all, they will go down in history as being little more than Zionist sycophants who enabled the destruction of the nation’s Charter rights to freedom of expression.

God have mercy on their tormented, deluded souls.

As for Faith Goldy there appears to be little Hope and no Charity for the Islamic nations of the world. It appears that Goldy has traded her Bible in for a copy of the Babylonian Talmud and is now in total denial of the words of Jesus Christ, her supposed Saviour, who once so prophetically stated in Revelation 2 verse 9: “I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan.”


Prime Minister Justin Trudeau Stands with Racist, Zionist, Supremacist, Terrorist Israel from PMO office


[Editor’s Note: For the record. The ongoing statements emanating forth from the Prime Minister’s Office that promote and laud the barbarism and murder and terrorism and lies and deceit of the Zionist Jew ‘state’ of Israel are solid confirmation that the Liberal government of Canada under Trudeau Jr. is fully under the control of the Jew lobbyists here in Canada. 

Issuing this type of blatant bullshit propaganda on the Israeli state while at the same time refusing to allow French comedian Dieudonne to enter the country is the height of hypocrisy and bigotry and makes Canada a laughing stock of nations around the world who are well versed on the true, actual reality of what the ‘state’ of Israel is really about.

Canada is still another Zionist Occupied Government (ZOG) and the nation is being blacklisted around the globe because of these unabashed lies and propaganda that our government keeps sending out to the people here and around the world.

Justin Trudeau. You’re just another lying, two-faced, ignorant puppet/sycophant of the Jews and you’ll go down in real history as a traitor to Canada just as your Marxist, Communist father did.

Shalom my ass! There will never be peace until Israel is removed from the nations of the world and Zionism and Jewish power is destroyed just as Syphilis and other contagious diseases inimical to a healthy world.]

JustinIsraelPuppetStatement by the Prime Minister of Canada on Israel Independence Day

May 12, 2016
Ottawa, Ontario

The Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau, today issued the following statement in celebration of Yom Ha’atzmaut:

“Today, we celebrate the 68th anniversary of the founding of the State of Israel with our Israeli friends and Jewish communities, both here in Canada, and around the world.

“The State of Israel is a thriving and vibrant country, which Canada is proud to call a close partner and steadfast ally.

“Canada and Israel unite in their people-to-people ties, shared values, respect for democracy, and growing trade relationship. I look forward to continuing to strengthen our strong friendship.

“Although today is a joyous day, let us also reflect on the threat that Israel and its people continue to face throughout the world in the form of terrorist attacks, acts of anti-Semitism, and religious intolerance. Canada stands with Israel and will continue to promote peace and stability in the region.

“On behalf of Sophie and our children, I wish everyone celebrating Israel’s Independence Day a Yom Ha’atzmaut Sameach. Shalom.”


Canada’s Illegal Government by Jeff Nielson (Bullion Bulls Canada)

Screen Shot 2015-10-11 at 1.00.15 PM


Canada’s Illegal Government

Published: 30 January 2015

by Jeff Nielson (Bullion Bulls Canada)


On December 4th, 2008, Canada ceased to have a legal, legitimate government. It was on that date that Stephen Harper (and his Conservative regime) demanded that Parliament be illegally suspended, on the (supposed) grounds of a “national emergency”. And on that date, Canada’s Governor General, Michaëlle Jean, rubber-stamped Harper’s demand.

What was the basis of the so-called “national emergency” which prompted Harper’s illegal act? Canada’s opposition parties had publicly stated their intention to hold a Parliamentary vote, for the purpose of voting Harper’s corrupt, minority government out of office. While undoubtedly the prospect of being thrown out on his ass was a personal “emergency” for Stephen Harper, there is no possible way in which any rational human being could consider a Parliamentary vote to be “a national emergency”.

There can be no equivocation here. Harper’s demand to illegally suspend Parliament (and thus illegally usurp political power) was an act of treason. Michaëlle Jean’s choice to rubber-stamp that demand was also an act of treason. While the position of Governor General is largely ceremonial, she had one duty/responsibility to uphold: ensuring that any/all procedural acts in which she participated were legal and constitutional.

No mentally competent adult could have construed Harper’s illegal demand to be a legitimate basis for suspending Parliament. Her decision to rubber-stamp Harper’s demand made her a simple, criminal accomplice to Harper’s overt act of treason.

Arguably, however, these original acts of treason were not the greatest outrages which occurred at that time. The greatest outrages came immediately afterward. Canada’s corrupt Corporate media began a massive campaign to brainwash the Canadian people.

These liars described the intention of Canada’s opposition parties to vote the Harper government out of power as “undemocratic”. Again, there can be no equivocation. Voting is THE fundamental act of democracy. Voting is as essential an act for democracy as breathing is for all mammals.

It is impossible for any mentally competent adult to believe voting to be “undemocratic”. While mere lying is not/cannot be the basis for a charge of treason, it was the weeks of saturation-lying by the Corporate media which successfully cemented Harper’s original act of treason. They were accomplices in fact, if not in law.

But there was even a greater outrage involved here. The pathetic drones masquerading as the “citizens” of Canada passively accepted those lies, with nary a whimper. In doing so, the residents of Canada conclusively demonstrated that they were no longer citizens at all, but merely serfs.

Being a citizen does not merely confer privileges; it carries responsibilities. While one could construct a fairly lengthy list of such responsibilities, paramount on any such list would be the duty of vigilance. When the government of a nation ceases to be legitimate (because of its own treasonous act) and refuses to surrender power, what then?

It is then the duty of all citizens to demonstrate the Power of the People. It begins with public protest. Prying their eyes away from their computer monitors/TV screens, lifting themselves off of their (comfortable) couches – and getting out into the streets. Public protest is the greatest fear of all criminals/tyrants, because (if maintained) it cannot be ignored by any sitting government, nor can it be covered up by any lying, complicit media.

However, there is one duty of being a citizen which is even more fundamental than the duty of vigilance (and protest). Citizens have a duty to think. It is the serf (and only the serf) who passively does whatever he/she is told to do, without thinking. The “citizen” who refuses to use his brain is no longer a citizen.

It is because of this series of outrages that Canada continues to be governed by a totally illegal/illegitimate regime. But wait, shout Harper’s apologists. On May 2, 2011, Harper’s Conservatives “won” a majority in that election, and so now it is a “legitimate” government.

No, it is not.

Apart from the fact that Harper’s previous act of treason personally disqualifies him from any public office (let alone the Prime Minister’s chair), no subsequent election can/could legitimize this illegal regime. The reasoning here is legally and logically irrefutable.

Because of Harper’s prior act of treason, the Conservatives entered that election as the illegal incumbent. Political incumbents win roughly 2/3rds of all elections. Thus, Harper’s original act of treason literally doubled his chance of winning the election, and therefore “winning” an election via this large, illegal advantage de-legitimized this Conservative regime – in perpetuity.

As the illegal incumbent, no subsequent election can/could ever remove the stain of Harper’s previous act of treason, and thus transform an illegal government into a legal government. The only way, in theory, that the Conservative Party could ever form a legitimate/legal government is by first surrendering the political power which they have illegally usurped, and then getting elected as a non-incumbent (i.e. as an opposition party).

Unless/until that happens, the government of Canada – this traitorous Conservative regime – will remain an illegal government. However, there is still one more essential piece to this narrative, which not only fully explains how and why the opposition parties were going to vote the Conservatives out of office; it fully defines Stephen Harper as the Canadian traitor that he is.

It is no secret that there is little goodwill between Canada’s opposition parties. Indeed, it was/is their disunity which allowed Harper’s illegal government to achieve its “majority” in the last election, despite only having the support of 4 out of 10 Canadians. So what united these squabbling politicians to the point where they intended to form an official coalition?

Stephen Harper (while still running a minority government) arrogantly attempted to ram through what he called “electoral reform”. What Harper was really doing was attempting to end all public financing for elections. While the Canadian people (i.e. 30+ million serfs) totally failed to grasp the significance of this monstrous (and traitorous) act, the politicians in Canada’s opposition parties immediately understood Harper’s plan.

With no more public financing for elections, this would allow Canada’s largest Corporations (and the ultra-wealthy people who own these Corporations) to simply buy the government of their choice, through drowning out any and all other candidates with their ability to finance unlimited/infinite “campaign advertising” (i.e. propaganda). Obviously, if the Corporate media can (and did) convince Canada’s serf-population that voting is “undemocratic”, that same propaganda machine can get these same serfs to vote for whoever they are told to vote for.

Which party do all of Canada’s large corporations (and the Corporate media) support, with unswerving loyalty? Harper’s corrupt Conservatives. The “electoral reform” which Harper tried to implement would have (effectively) permanently ended Canada’s democracy and guaranteed corrupt Conservative rule, forever.

More than any other act, this defines Stephen Harper as the irredeemable traitor that he is. Of course, any Canadians who have actually been paying attention during Harper’s reign of error would also be aware of several other treasonous acts:
1) Along with his hand-picked stooge Mark Carney, Harper has deliberately destroyed the value of the Canadian dollar. Put another way, the collapse of the loonie under Stephen Harper is roughly equal to the current collapse of the Russian ruble – which the entire world refers to as “a currency crisis”.

2) He signed a “military cooperation” deal with the U.S., which surrenders Canada’s sovereignty to the U.S. government. The U.S. military is now legally allowed to enter Canada to conduct military operations (i.e. wage war), without obtaining the consent of Canada’s government.

3) Harper is giving away our most precious natural resource (tar-sands oil) as fast as he can, as cheaply as he can. Canada is currently losing as much as $50 per barrel on every barrel of tar-sands oil it “sells” to the U.S.
Those are only Harper’s most obvious treasonous acts. He has also totally undermined the Canadian financial system, destroyed Canada’s trade surplus, destroyed Canada’s budget surplus, deliberately duplicated the U.S.’s housing bubble in Canada, and entrenched the “bail-in” (simple, naked stealing by the Big Banks) into our political/legal system.

Not only does Canada have an illegal government, it has a traitorous government intent on destroying Canada. Stephen Harper does not serve the Canadian people. Stephen Harper has never served the Canadian people. He has only one Master, and his name is “Uncle Sam”.


Stephen Harper Is Dismantling Canadian Sovereignty for Globalism!

Draft Constitution of the Canadian People’s Party

Canadian Action Party

Canadian Council of Chief Executives (CCCE) [globalist corporate scum]

Oh Canada Movie – Private Banks Versus National Bank Money Creation – What Is Money? – Compound Interest = Exponential Legalized Theft

Canadians sued the Bank of Canada and won

Harper Zionists seek to boost Canada thought crime law

Stephen “Errand Boy” Harper and the Zionist Regime in Ottawa’s Bill C-51 – CSIS Working Covertly With ISIS™ – Al-Qaeda™ Franchises Supported With NATO and Israeli Airstrikes – The Gambit Has Collapsed, Their Hand Is Exposed: Western “Intelligence” Agencies (Rackets) Can’t Maintain the Bogus Narrative – Using False Flags to Hoodwink the Public Into Supporting Ludicrous, Lunatic Foreign Policies

Source article:

Betrayed: Stephen Harper’s war on principled conservatism by Connie Fournier

Stephen Harper’s war on principled conservatism

By Connie Fourier

Screen Shot 2015-09-28 at 9.32.38 PM


As co-founder of Free Dominion, an internet forum dedicated to principled conservatism, I have many experiences that I could – and probably should – write about.

Free Dominion was launched before the advent of the blogosphere, and long before there was anything in existence that resembled our current social media. The evolution of the media, its application to politics, and our many trials and tribulations as internet pioneers could fill several volumes.

Yet, it is those very trials and tribulations – FD’s experiences of “disruption” as practised by a government that has now given itself the power to impose it on us all – that qualify me to warn my fellow Canadian conservatives of what our continued support of the Harper government may mean.

Now, with an election looming, I find that the thing that is weighing on me most heavily and begging to be put into words is this, my plea to other conservatives to step up and defend our values from the very people we have worked so hard to elect.

I know that this book is not going to make me popular in some Conservative quarters.  In fact I suspect that there will be people I have long considered friends who will feel hurt and betrayed by my words.  For that I am deeply sorry.

But, there is no way around the fact that the Canadian conservative movement has lost its way.  The same people who were motivated to infuse our country with the principles of freedom and democracy, and willing to stand on Parliament Hill to defend those values against the Liberals, have become obsessed with the politics of personality. They are willing to turn a blind eye to anything that Stephen Harper does, because keeping “our team” in power is now the most important thing in the world. Even if “our  team” is now behaving worse than the dreaded Liberals.

There is no doubt that conservatives have an uphill battle in this country.  When they are in power, there is no external force pushing the Conservative Party to remain conservative.  Other political parties are left-leaning, so nobody in the House of Commons is going to be opposing moves by the Conservative government that run counter to the conservative principles of the grassroots.

We understood that when we founded Free Dominion. From the very beginning we said that the site would never be a “Conservative Party” site, but that it would stand for non-partisan, principled conservative values, and that it would hold right-wing politicians accountable.

Unfortunately, as the Conservative Party became more entrenched in Ottawa, and Stephen Harper consolidated all of the power by winning a majority, then silencing Members of Parliament and stacking the Senate, the grassroots members of the Conservative Party became less and less important, and less and less vocal.

In retrospect, it was almost inevitable that a ruling Conservative party willing to ignore and ostracize its base would begin to create laws that were obviously not conservative, in the principled sense. The Harper government began to completely disregard the most cherished rights of all Canadians, those of freedom of speech and personal privacy.

Instead of taking responsibility for what we have unleashed on our country, most conservatives have chosen to blindly dismiss the warnings of privacy and constitutional experts and stand behind their guy. American president Franklin Delano Roosevelt justified his support for a Central American dictator by saying “he might be a bastard, but he‘s our bastard”. Current Canadian Conservatives appear to have taken FDR’s rationalization to heart.

The last time we had a Conservative Prime Minister who went off the rails, the Party was split and remained so for many years. Brian Mulroney did a lot of things that infuriated the conservative base, and conservatives reacted strongly by withdrawing their support and voting, instead, for the new Reform Party.

This time there is no major alternative conservative party to attract the votes of conservatives who are disillusioned with Stephen Harper. And, I don‘t really think there is an appetite for creating another Party split even if there was.  But, the fact remains that the misdeeds of Brian Mulroney pale in significance when compared to the gross attacks on our freedom that have been perpetrated by Stephen Harper and his Conservative government.

In this book, I will be making the case that conservative Canadians have a responsibility to keep our government in check.  When a leader that we have elected goes off the rails and begins to dismantle the very fabric of our democracy, we have a duty to send our own people into the political wilderness until they learn to handle the unfettered power of a majority government with the care and respect it deserves.

Perhaps you are thinking right now that I am not giving Stephen Harper enough trust.  You might think that he is not the type of man to abuse legislation that allows warrantless government access to our personal information, or legislation that allows judges, in secret trials, to give CSIS permission to do virtually anything but rape us or kill us.

His record tells a different story as I detail in Chapter ten.

But,  even if you do trust Stephen Harper and discount my reading of events, he is not going to be the Prime Minister forever. You have a responsibility to ask yourself if you trust the level of power that Harper has consolidated in the PMO in the hands of every potential new government that this country ever elects.

If the answer to that question is “no”, then we must accept that Stephen Harper, by ramming through some very perilous legislation – most notably Bill  C-51, the  Anti-Terrorism Act – has put future generations in danger. For that reason alone he must be stopped. I will be talking in this book about Free Dominion’s history and about some of our experiences with censorship and “disruption” that have occurred already under the watch of our Conservative government. Unfortunately, there will be holes left in our story because, at the time of this writing, we are bound by an extremely broad court injunction that could literally land us in prison for contempt of court if we share certain details of our journey.

Despite this impediment, I will share what I can, and I hope I will give my fellow conservatives some important things to think about.  What is our responsibility as party grassroots? As Canadians? Should we hold our own leaders accountable? If so, how?

All of these are critical questions that must be asked and answered by Canadian conservatives.  We took the bull by the horns in 1993 and we showed the Conservative government of the day what kind of values we expected them to exhibit.  Now it seems we have come full-circle and we are back at that same crossroads.

What do we do?  Do we put on our blinders and satisfy ourselves with the fact that, after many years of work, “our team” is finally in the driver‘s seat? Or do we remember all of the things were fought for… indeed, all of the things that our forefathers fought and died for… and get back in the game?

I hope that by the time you finish reading this book, you will be ready to choose the latter.

Our chance to act is coming soon. Election day is October 19th, 2015. Let’s make it count.

~ Connie Fournier

ORDER BETRAYED NOW:  Kindle Version | Paperback Version

“Essential reading for the principled Canadian conservative” Gerry T. Neal

“This is an important book to read for everyone who understands the crucial role freedom of speech plays … this book will open your eyes to the systematic process that is already in place to persecute political foes of the party in power …” Xanthippas

“Many will find this book’s conclusions controversial, but its premise is unassailable: Canada’s conservative movement has lost its way, a warning call all conservatives should heed.” Gerry Nicholls

“Betrayed sets out the facts of Free Dominion’s betrayal. It outlines the hypocritical pragmatism of the Conservatives and it shows why no political party should ever be entrusted with the powers of C-51.” Jay Currie


Kindle Version [via Amazon]

Softcover Book [via Amazon]


You can send an Interac Email Money Transfer from participating Canadian Banks. Interac transfer address:

Order via Snail Mail:

Connie Fournier

2000 Unity Rd.

Elginburg, ON K0H 1M0


BETRAYED: Stephen Harper’s war on principled conservatism

Authored by Connie J Fournier

Contributions by Mark J Fournier

Edition: 1

Longtime Canadian conservative activist Connie Fournier makes the case that the Conservative government in Canada has lost its way and that party members have a responsibility to hold their leadership accountable in the 2015 federal election by voting against Stephen Harper.

Publication Date: Aug 03 2015

ISBN/EAN13: 1515399400 / 9781515399407

Page Count: 154

Binding Type: US Trade Paper

Trim Size: 6″ x 9″

Language: English

Color: Black and White

Related Categories: Political Science / Privacy & Surveillance

Stephen Harper Hates Me

Screen Shot 2015-05-19 at 8.02.30 AM

UN General Assembly: Israel’s actions in Jerusalem are null and void by Anthony Lawson


UN General Assembly: Israel’s actions in Jerusalem are null and void


Anthony Lawson

MEMO | November 27, 2014


The United Nations General Assembly adopted six resolutions regarding Israeli occupied territories through a recorded vote last night, addressing the areas of Jerusalem and the Syrian Golan.

In terms of Jerusalem, the Assembly voted on a resolution confirming that all legislative and administrative measures taken by Israel to change the legal status of the Holy City of Jerusalem are null and void.

The decision was supported by a recorded vote of 144 countries in favour, six countries opposed, namely Canada, Israel, Marshall Islands, Micronesia, Palau and United States, while ten countries abstained from the vote (Australia, Cameroon, Central African Republic, Madagascar, Panama, Papua New Guinea, Paraguay, Togo and Tonga and Vanuatu).

The Assembly also adopted a resolution that stressed the need for Israel, the occupying power, to withdraw from the occupied Palestinian territories, and demanded the complete cessation of all Israeli settlement activity and Israel’s compliance with its obligations under international law.

The Assembly’s decision also outlined the need for delivering humanitarian and medical aid to the Palestinians.

Another decision was implemented regarding the Syrian Golan Heights as a result of the Assembly’s concern for Israel’s lack of compliance with Resolution 497 (issued in 1981) calling on Israel to withdraw its forces from the Golan Heights which have been illegally occupied since 1967. The decision was supported by 99 countries, rejected by six, while 57 (mostly European) countries abstained from the vote.

We can only sit and wonder when some Apartheid-Zionist-Jewish-Israel-loving nation will blow this out of the water, just as Israel tried to blow the USS Liberty out of the water in June, 1967.  Will it be the United States applying its veto?

And just look at the nations controlled by the grubby little bribe takers: Stephen Harper of Canada and Australia’s Tony Abbott, who either voted against the six resolutions, or abstained; openly admitting that land-theft and prisoner-of-war slaying are permissible, as long as the Jewish State of Israel can cloak them in some kind of constitutionally fraudulent legalese.


Shame on them!

And look at their expressions.  What are they thinking?

“This should be worth a nice a good-sized packet of Shekels.”

Anthony Lawson — with thanks to aletho for bringing it to my notice.

*    *    *

Only fools believe what they are told, when it is clear that much else is being hidden.


Current, Past and Continuing Carnage in Palestine. Open Letter to NDP Leader Thomas Mulcair by Wallace Klinck


(“Hon.”) Thomas Mulcair,

Having received your Party’s appeal for assistance to “evacuate” child victims of Israeli slaughter in Palestine I must say that in my opinion this is about the most hypocritical and frankly insipid initiative that I could imagine.  If the degenerate and/or demented politicians of the West who obviously place political power above all else, including the lives of innocents, had taken firm and decisive ethical, educated and effective action over a half-century (and more) ago to prevent this unspeakable tragedy which was predicted and warned against by informed, intelligent and moral people—including, to no avail, some conscientious Jews—the whole situation would never have transpired.
Apparently the NDP (No Damned Principles Party?) wants to facilitate the complete destruction and dispossession of the indigenous  peoples of that ill-fated and pitiful land by doing nothing to stop the outrage while actually assisting in the expulsion of the Palestinians from their historic land.  All “justified” by the most outrageous and preposterous claims made in support of a rude, crude, murderous, Anti-Christian Pharisaic monstrosity which has battened itself upon the area and seeks continued extensive expansion in the Middle East, per se.  And, typically, your appeal offers no opportunity for comment or input from those to whom it is made.  Just donate—that’s all!  Your contempt for not only the morals but the intelligence of the general public must be without bounds.
At least the misguided and/or contemptible sympathies and alliances of the Harper “Canadian” Government are openly proclaimed from the roof-tops, without, of course, ever dealing candidly in depth with the real historic and philosophical/religious issues involved, with the arrogant and insulting assumption that the public is too uninformed and/or plainly stupid to ever know or understand such matters in any case.  Certainly every effort is made to ensure that an assumed ignorant public remains in that useful state.  They are, nevertheless, rapidly becoming less so uneducated.
We are informed from history, Mr. Mulcair, that the Roman Senator Cicero declared that politicians were not born but excreted.  Undoubtedly, he had enough experience to know something of the facts which obtained during his lifetime and by all appearances we might conclude that nothing much has changed over a span of two-thousand years.
Personally, I would not knowingly approach within five-hundred miles of you and the leadership, especially, of the other political parties more or less in general, if not exclusively, for fear of polluting my soul.  If I did not consider myself to be a Christian, I would sorely be tempted to wish you all who are culpable a pleasant abode in Perdition for Eternity.  No doubt, a Higher Power will adjudicate this issue.  Little wonder it is that the word “politician” is becoming, unfortunately but inexorably, a curse upon the lips of growing multitudes of people.
Yours Very Sincerely
Wallace Klinck


Israel critics targeted by Jewish terrorist organization as ‘anti-Semites’ in Canada by Joshua Blakeney

Screen Shot 2014-06-04 at 10.51.56 PM


Screen Shot 2014-06-04 at 10.51.12 PM

Israel critics targeted by Jewish Terrorist Organization as ‘anti-Semites’ in Canada

by Joshua Blakeney

The Jewish Defense League “was classified as a right-wing terrorist group by the FBI in 2001?Wikipedia


Screen Shot 2014-06-04 at 11.13.19 PM 

Since 2010, I have been Press TV’s Canadian correspondent based in Calgary, Alberta. I have been forced by the actions and statements of Canada’s ruling neoconservatives to hone in on the role Zionists and the organized Jewish community play in Canadian society.

Canada’s current government has shifted this country from being a comparatively benign and peaceful nation to being a warmongering de facto colony of Israel. I believe the evidence suggests this didn’t just happen by accident; the Zionization of Canada was a carefully planned, well-oiled operation.

Screen Shot 2014-06-04 at 9.48.23 PM

If I was wrong in my analyses of the interface between Canada’s government and pro-Israel forces, I believe I would have been invited on one of the many Zionist-controlled media organs here, debated by some high-IQ Zionist intellectual and exposed as erroneous and foolish. I believe it is because we at Press TV are accurate in our analyses of Canadian power and politics that a segment of the organized Jewish community has decided to turn to coercion.

 Screen Shot 2014-06-04 at 9.48.37 PM

Click here: Press TV Canadian correspondent, Joshua Blakeney, threatened by Jewish terrorist organization

I would like to make available an email I received from the Jewish Defense League, a group described in an FBI report entitled “Terrorism 2000/2001” as a “violent extremist organization:”

Screen Shot 2014-06-04 at 9.49.58 PM 

[Editor’s note: In a bizarre development, on 3 June 2014, an article denying that any such threat was sent, “Jewish Defense League head says Canadian correspondent for Iran’s Press TV lied about receiving a threat from his organization”, appeared, claiming that Joshua Blakeney is lying. So I submitted a comment explaining that he had sent it to me and I had published it here, which made it easy to tell who was lying and who was not, which the moderator unsurprisingly decided against posting. That’s a very nice example of chutzpah!]

A “hate-filled anti-Semite”

There are several fallacies committed in this unpleasant email. Firstly, I am not a “hate-filled anti-Semite.” I define Anti-Semitism as an “irrational hatred of all Jews generically.” You have to dislike all Jews and irrationally so to qualify as an Anti-Semite in my book. I merely oppose the actions, arguments and assumptions of those Jews who are oppressors, warmongers, apologists for Israel and proponents of a Zionist exeptionalist police state, etc. Some Jews agree with me, some almost agree with me and others evidently hate me. Either way, criticizing those in power, regardless of their ethnicity, is a natural right which I embrace zealously.

Unlike the JDL, who claim they intend to act with “extreme prejudice” against me, I’m guided by post-judice insofar as my conclusions are derived from an analysis of the factual record. My analyses are rational, logical and evidence based. Evidence emerged of Israeli involvement in 9/11 and then I deduced that Israel conducts false-flag terrorism against the US. The evidence came first, then my conclusion.

Pathological hatred of Jews

Equally misguided is to characterize my alleged “hatred of Jews” as “pathological.” The usage of psychoanalytic verbiage to quash criticism of Jews is the product of Sigmund Freud and members of the Frankfurt School, Jewish thinkers who popularized their ethnocentric doctrines in the first half of the 20th Century. By describing my criticism of certain Jews as “pathological,” the writer of the email exempts himself from addressing the content of my criticisms. If my criticisms are the product of a psychopathology, then they have no relation to the real world and thus need not be addressed. How convenient.

Screen Shot 2014-06-04 at 10.56.23 PM

Click here: Harper Zionists seek to boost Canadian thought crime laws

Some academicians and law experts have advised me to take this threatening email to the authorities here in Canada. However, I am intuitively averse to having the state decide which emails are good and which are bad. I’d rather engage in debate and dialogue with my interlocutors. Furthermore, it seems unlikely that Canada’s current regime would ever prosecute Jewish ethnic activists like the members of the JDL. That would be in contravention of the Jewish-exceptionalist ideology that seemingly governs this country at the present time.

Jewish exceptionalism

The Canadian state has defenestrated the values of British Common Law that once guided Canadian society (such as freedom of speech, freedom of expression, adversarial argumentation, habeas corpus and freedom of movement) in favor of the eliminationist ideology of Jewish exceptionalism. Critics of Jews find themselves arrested for “hate speech” or “inciting genocide” and non-Canadian citizens are barred from the country or deported.

For example, it has now been demonstrated that Canada’s ruling neoconservatives barred pro-Palestinian peace activist and parliamentarian George Galloway from Canada in 2009 at the behest of the JDL. This is one reason I don’t fear the JDL per se; there was a time when they had no political clout and thus had to actively engage in their own thuggery and aggression toward those whose perspectives they sought to suppress. Now they have Canada’s MPs and politicized police forces at their disposal to do their dirty work for them. If Mr. Galloway had turned up at the Canadian border in mid-2009, the police would have arrested and incarcerated the six-times-elected British MP, based on lobbying efforts by the JDL. In this epoch, the JDL can sit back and let Israel’s client regime in Ottawa do all the work.

The JDL in Canada

The extent of the Zionization of Canada is revealed by the very presence of the JDL in this country. The militant organization is reportedly proscribed in the US and in many EU countries. In spite of this, periodically Meir Weinstein, leader of the JDL in Canada, pops up on our TV screens as if he is a moderate Canadian political pundit. Quite what the members of the JDL contribute to Canadian society other than aggressive censoriousness and ethnic tension is unclear.

Screen Shot 2014-06-04 at 10.57.47 PM

Click here: Harper’s love affair with Zionism

In 1995 German ethnic-activist and historian Ernst Zundel had his house firebombed by Zionist terrorists who disagreed with his historical conclusions. A group called the Jewish Armed Resistance Movement claimed responsibility for the attack but the Toronto Star later claimed that the group had ties to the JDL. Instead of locking up those aggressors who arrogated to themselves the right to revoke Mr. Zundel’s freedom of speech and destroy his property, the police incarcerated Zundel under so-called anti-terrorism legislation, which was later found to be unconstitutional.

You chose us as an enemy

Another falsehood in the email is the claim that “we didn’t choose you as an enemy, you chose us.” I grew up in a philo-Semitic household with holidays to Israel and visits to Auschwitz (and I’m not even Jewish!). It was primarily Israel’s oppression of the Palestinians and proven involvement in false flag attacks on Western countries that spurred me to voice criticism of certain Jews. Within recent days, Australia’s former Prime Minister Malcolm Fraser has confirmed that Israel deliberately attacked the USS Liberty in June 1967. Is he a “pathological” “antisemite” too?

So, to repeat, my conclusions are post-judicial not prejudicial (I actually pre-judged Jews favorably). The Zionists want to use countries like Britain, Canada and the US as playthings to advance Israeli geopolitical goals, expending the blood and treasure of us stupid goyim rather than that of Jews. Certain Zionist fanatics in my view declared war on my historically philo-Semitic people not vice-versa.

The pen is mightier than the sword

I’m keen to engage in dialogue with my detractors. It seems because I have the moral high ground and evidence on my side that some Zionists are now resorting to coercion to silence me.

In my view, the pen is mightier than the sword. The JDL should take a leaf out of my book instead of trying to eliminate anybody who criticizes them and their fellow Zionist ideologues.


Screen Shot 2014-06-04 at 11.01.15 PM






‘Come the Revolution….’ by Robin Mathews


Fascism And Contemporary Canada.  Locating The Present Conservative Government

Led By Stephen Harper.  Part 12: ‘Come The Revolution ….’


Robin Mathews

February 5th, 2014


From the so-called Peasants Revolt of 1381 in England through the French Revolution of 1789 to the Russian Revolution of 1917, the Chinese Revolution of 1949, the Cuban Revolution of 1959, the Nicaraguan Revolution of 1978-9, the Iranian Revolution of 1979, the Bolivarian (electoral) Revolution in Venezuela in 2007, the Ecuadorian Citizens’ (electoral) Revolution of 2008, the Tunisian Revolution of 2010, and the Egyptian Revolution of 2011 (and there are more), one thing is clear.  Revolutionary action in modern society is increasing … not decreasing.

It is action to take power from a small super-rich, ruling and exploiting class and deliver it to a broader population … by peaceful and/or other means.

Conversely, a huge blanket of propaganda is being thrown over global populations by the corporate-owned media, by elaborate political agencies engaging in public manipulation and massage, and through high-cost, non-media corporate indoctrination. In addition, military and other coups to end democratic governments continue – as was the case in Egypt in 2012.

The blanket of propaganda is intended to assure the world’s population that it is better off with vast concentrations of wealth in the hands of a few, with unregulated corporate fouling of the ecosystem, with increasing exploitation and pauperization of whole communities, and with governments dedicated to service of the corporate minority rather than to open, visible representation of the larger population.

The tension between the two forces grows stronger daily.

The ‘smother’ tactics of the super-rich and their docile governments cannot be underestimated. Many examples are so obvious they are missed altogether. Here’s a pair that will offend many – because of the successful indoctrination to which we have ALL been subjected!

Born in 1918 Nelson Mandela – as we all know – became a revolutionary, was jailed for years, became South Africa’s first Black president and worked to erase apartheid and to reconcile racial differences.  A hero, he won the Nobel Peace Prize and at least 250 other honours from around the world.

He did not, however, rebuild the South African economy and land ownership to provide greater justice for most of the people … not in any serious way.  By accident or design he left a system in the hands of global corporations.

And so, for example, in August 2012 thirty-four miners were killed and seventy-eight wounded at the Marikana platinum mine by South African Police Officers acting for a British Corporation.  That and other injustices have caused new parties to spring up, confronting huge poverty, unemployment, rapacious multi-national corporations, unending urban crime … and more. The ANC government of South Africa is doing all it can to ignore the meaning of the Marikana massacre.

When Nelson Mandela died in 2013, government leaders from around the world attended his funeral.  Among them were those dedicated to the rule of the super-rich who conducted the trumped-up wars in Iraq, Libya, and Afghanistan. Praise for Mandela was unlimited. The global press was saturated. No eulogy could be too extravagant for The Great Freedom Fighter.

Born in 1926 Fidel Castro – as we all know – became a revolutionary, in and out of jail, conducted an armed revolution, won it, and completely reconstructed Cuba to provide for the health and welfare of all Cubans.  Hated by corporate USA, Cuba has spent decades and decades suffering from U.S. boycotts, sanctions, and blockades of all sorts (as well as an armed invasion) instituted in an attempt to destroy its government and to impoverish its people. Named a Hero of the Soviet Union, Fidel Castro has been forced to elude at least 600 assassination attempts made on him by the U.S.A.

The Cuban socialist experiment survives.  In addition Cuba has been an aid and an inspiration to movements all over South and Central America working to increase the democratic power of populations.  When Fidel Castro dies,
the global press will portray him as a brute who savaged human rights and a ‘dictator’ who denied ‘freedom’ to his people.

The governments that turned Iraq, Libya, and Afghanistan   into wastelands of poverty, crime, civil war, disease, destruction of property, and social chaos will refuse to attend Fidel Castro’s funeral – in order to preserve their propaganda images of saintly morality. Among them – if he is still around – will be Stephen Harper, Canada’s present prime minister, who has aligned himself and his government with the super-rich – with the global, repressive, corporate forces.

Screen Shot 2014-02-09 at 8.12.02 PMTo do that, any government has to abandon its existence as an entity working within legal and established constitutional structures. In bids to maintain illegitimate power, for instance, the present Conservative government led by Stephen Harper has repeatedly engaged in what are, in fact, criminal actions to befoul the electoral system.

In addition, it has used the Prime Minister’s Office (and the Canadian Senate) in a combination of actions that have brought accusations of criminal activity. In preceding columns I have asked if the Prime Minister’s Office and the Conservative Party of Canada may be designated ‘criminal organizations’?

That those questions can even be asked says all that needs to be said …. The Conservative forces in Canada have been found out in major malicious, organized, intentional violations of the law and the constitution.

In doing so, they have joined the forces across the globe  determined to violate, to reinterpret, or to rewrite laws and processes governing social behaviour in such a way as to remove democratic oversight and protection of freedoms – and to erase constitutional guarantees of due process.

By intentional administrative violations (as with B.C. government’s repeated unconstitutional attacks on teachers), by draconian ‘terrorist’ laws made ‘for the protection of national security’, by voluminous so-called ‘international free trade’ and economic agreements, by the hobbling of democratic institutions (like unions), and by open coercion on the part of international banking authorities (always contributing to private banking powers and profits) governments of ‘the free world’ – of the U.S., Europe, Canada, and other nations – are serving the super-rich in their battle against democratic populations.

Corruption in the European Community, for instance, we are told, is worth $180 Billions annually (Globe and Mail, Feb 4 14, p. A11). It is directly connected to governments. The problem is caused, the Globe reports, by “the ties between the political class and industry”.

The outcome of such monumental fraud practiced on the population is easy to predict. In the shorter term tensions will increase. In the longer term the outcome will be a long period of fascist rule in formerly ‘democratic’ countries, or there will be an overthrow of present directions and a return to popularly responsible governments.

For the present there are no national Opposition Parties in Canada seriously engaged with that real, historical confrontation of forces.

And so tensions will grow until a wholly new Party is founded on what will have to be – in terms of present political ideology and behaviour – revolutionary ideas.  It might even be called the “The Canadian Revolution Party” to indicate its root and branch difference from anything presently in existence.


Its platform isn’t hard to predict. It will strip corporations of their present unannounced governing power and license them under strict regulation and oversight. All private corporate activity in Canada will not only be taxed through progressive taxation programs, but will be audited to end the fake tax reporting and massive illegitimate profit-taking that characterizes present behaviour, especially from corporations headquartered outside of Canada.

The new Canadian government will engage in full-scale economic activity through Crown Corporations. Proved by past excellence, they will engage in, especially, what are described as infrastructure activities: energy production and transmission, transportation, health and education facilities. Worker-owned enterprise and community created management of housing, retirement facilities, cultural undertakings … and more … will be encouraged and supported.

Screen Shot 2014-02-09 at 8.29.31 PMThe Canadian government will take over and direct all credit granted in the country, through the Bank of Canada. Private credit-granting banks will continue under strict regulation, but the Central Bank will manage all credit for ‘national’ enterprise. The balance between the two forces will ensure the existence of lively private critics of all government credit activities and governmental critics of all private, corporate lending.

Screen Shot 2014-02-09 at 8.29.38 PMThe new government will erase or fundamentally reconstruct all so-called Free Trade Agreements to eliminate ‘rule by private corporations’… and to reinvest and liberate Canadian expertise and energy in the creation of industry and enterprise. It will also work to liberate workers who are presently (in fact) slave labourers in so-called far-away “off-shore sourcing” populations by making Canadian laws to cover them. Canada will take a leading place among countries seeking international equality and justice.

Canada will unite environmental law with intense ‘green’ programs of all kinds to prevent polluting activities and to make them, finally, unnecessary.

Quite simply, the new Party in power will completely overturn the present goal of the ruling elites which is to erase the Canadian population as the significant basis of law, justice, social interaction, and economic enterprise in the country. The struggle will be a hard-fought one because it will not arise out of any of the existing political parties and formations in the country – all of which have openly or tacitly signed on to the program of the super-rich.

If that were not so, readers would recognize (at least some) Opposition Party policies in the ones I have set out as part of the revolutionary change that must come about. But not one of the present parties has put forward a single one of the major ideas set forth here as necessary in order to make significant change.

The case seems hopeless. There is no sign of new leadership.  The population seems drugged or willingly passive. The present Conservative government of Canada  engages in open destruction of democratic institutions … and in criminal behaviour.

History shows us, however, that such times are often, in fact, the seedtimes of sudden unpredictable happenings and the appearance of apparently unprepared leaders seeming to come from nowhere. They gather solid support and – to the population’s delighted surprise – make changes that seem so obvious, necessary, and fair that all come to believe the changes were already in their own minds before the new leadership appeared to set out on the new direction.


Robin Mathews can be contacted at:

Traitors Without Borders by Mantiq al-Tayr
Traitors Without Borders

September 22, 2013


1. I’ve completely had it with Israel and its pernicious lobby in these United States. However, as angry as I am, I still enjoy laughing at our Canadian brothers and sisters, especially the ones who are afraid that the US will take over Canada. Not that they shouldn’t be worried, but the fact is, if the United States wanted to take over Canada it would have to first liberate Canada from Israel, an unlikely occurrence.

By the way, General Abdel Fattah Sisi is a Jew, but I digress.

Back to Canada.

All you them thar Canadiuns who want to try to take your country back might want to start planning for a huge demonstration on December 1, 2013. You see, The Israeli Prime Minister for Chanadian Affairs, Stephen Harper, is being honored by the Jewish National Fund of Toronto on December 1st, 2013 at the Metro Centre in Toronto. It will be a huge, lavish, Israel-firster affair during which Haper’s complete, total, 100 per cent ownership by Israel will be proclaimed as the greatest thing since someone got the idea and men should cut off the end of the dicks.  It’s called the Negev Dinner 2013.


On, and thanks to Xymphora for noting this, to make matters even worse the, this same bunch of Israel-firsters is going to use 2013 Negev Campaign funds to build a bird sanctuary in Israel and they are going to name this sanctuary after Stephen Harper.  Needless to say, all of the tuyuur at Mantiq al-Tayr are pissed. Really pissed.

According to the JNF Toronto website, you can call here to get more info. Canadians of the world unite! And call that number and tell them what you think.:



2. In the meantime, members of the US Congress continue to worship Israel and to sacrifice American interests at the alter of the “Jewish State.”  There’s a little publicized outfit full of Israel-firsters in Congress called, and I’m not making this up, “The Congressional Israel Allies Caucus” (part of the Israel Allies Foundation) and it is up to no good, as one might expect.  As I write these words these assholes are meeting in Jerusalem, Israel – that’s what they call it and you can see above, for a three day conference dedicated to kissing Israel’s ass.

“Thousands of Christians, along with lawmakers from around the world, will participate in an Israel Allies Foundation conference beginning Sunday.

“The 25 visiting lawmakers are leaders of pro-Israel caucuses in their countries, affiliated with the Israel Allies Foundation, founded by former tourism minister Rabbi Bennie Elon, and the Knesset Christian Allies Caucus.”

Here’s an interesting quote from their “About” page.

Pioneered by MK Rabbi Binyamin Elon, the Israel Allies Foundation (IAF) works with Congress and parliaments around the world to mobilize political support for Israel based on Judeo-Christian values.”

Here’s another one. Note to Shas Party members, red highlighting is done by today’s guest editor, Noor al-Haqiqa or “Snip” as we call her in the chatroom.


Ms. Snip, guest editor

“The Foundation addresses a range of issues, most of which are spearheaded by the Caucus. These issues include moving the US Embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, recognizing Jerusalem as Israel’s united capital, addressing Iranian nuclear ambitions, making sure US funding does not go to terror connected entities, fighting against the delegitimization of Israel, and holding the UN and UNRWA accountable.  These issues are gravely important as US foreign policy has strategic bearing on our country’s security. “

Somebody ought to record the above and add a laugh track.

Go here to see if your congressman is a TRAITORS member.


A bunch of these dimwits in the Congressional Israel Allies Caucus (TRAITORS), have recently sponsored yet another bill to move the so-called US Embassy (which it isn’t) to Jerusalem.

These fuck heads are also on Facebook.

I find it interesting that when I come across articles about this conference we don’t seem to get the names of the politicians who are actually attending.

Instead of running around at Bilderberg conferences, I think our investigators in the alternative media need to be checking out the likes of The Congressional Israel Allies Caucus” and it’s mother organization the Israel Allies Foundation.

3. Okay it’s video time. First let’s take a look at the absolutely insane Trent Franks (Habayit Hayehudi, Arizona), co-chair of the Congressional Israel Allies Caucus and who just the other day said he intends to introduce legislation calling for war with Iran, as Franks talks of his devotion to a foreign power.

Screen Shot 2013-09-23 at 11.50.15 PM copy

Now that you have endured that, here’s your reward. “Haddi Ya Bahr” by NaVil Mansour and Ronza Ismael.

“Nostalgia and hope meet in this song and remind us on the core of the Palestinian cause: the Right of Return.”

Screen Shot 2013-09-23 at 11.50.28 PM copy

Stephen Harper. Psychopath? Connect The Dots. by Robin Mathews

Psychopath Harper

Stephen Harper. Psychopath? Connect The Dots.

Robin Mathews


The question of Stephen Harper’s sanity is before Canadians again. Insistently.

A psychopath, characteristically, is someone who is morally dead, a habitual liar, a ‘control freak’ who will use any deceit to achieve his or her ends while, fully consciously, masquerading to appear ‘normal’… and honest.

The present Saskatchewan electoral boundaries scandal involving Stephen Harper, RackNine Inc., Fred Delorey, Tom Lukiwski, Gerry Ritz (and others) is, I believe, the product of psychopath-driven behaviour. It involves a pattern of deception, misinformation, and seemingly organized disinformation.

The Saskatchewan scandal involves an attempt to misinform Saskatchewan voters (and all other Canadians). It is intended, I believe, to violate the integrity of an independent electoral commission, to impose a fraudulent outcome in the re-drawing of electoral boundaries, and to destroy the right of Canadians to free and fair democratic elections – on the road to creating a Harper-managed despotism in Canada.

Connect the dots.

First, remember the Harper organization admitted guilt to a highly-organized electoral violation in the 2006 election involving 68 constituencies. It admitted guilt, and paid a fine, after denying the charges for five years.

The Harper organization is alleged to have launched a huge Robocall attack on fair election practices in the 2011 election. That scandal is still under investigation by Elections Canada.

The organization is alleged to have intervened with illicit Robocall attacks in the recent Alberta (2012) election on behalf of the Far Right Wild Rose party.

Where, you might ask, does such activity come from?  I suggest it comes directly from – and under the supervision of – Stephen Harper.  Remember the U.S. immigrant who helped shape Stephen Harper’s rise to power, and who was a national campaign manager for Harper – Tom Flanagan?

For apparently offending Stephen Harper, Tom Flanagan has been cut out of the inner circle.  Nevertheless, he reports the “control freak” quality of Stephen Harper.  What he calls “a [permanent] campaign manager” is always on the job …”reporting directly to the Conservative leader ”[Stephen Harper], “not to a committee”. [Hill Times, Sept 10, p.1,19]

In addition, ex-Tory staffer Michael Sona points to major, centralized planning of fraud. (Sona seems to have been thrown to the wolves in a cover-up of the fraudulent 2011 election Robocall  scandal revealed in Guelph, Ontario.) Referring to the Saskatchewan scandal, Michael Sona (CTV, Feb 10) said “everything is centralized at headquarters….  I don’t find that”[the Harperite claim of an error in internal communication] “a very credible excuse”.

The CTV story adds that “the same company implicated in the [2011] election robocalls scandal, Edmonton-based RackNine Inc., has been linked to the situation in Saskatchewan”.

The observations by once-loyal Harperites suggest that what I call the campaign to destroy fair elections in Canada is led, directed, and overseen by Stephen Harper himself.

Connect the dots.

Keep in mind the present situation of the Conservative Party of Canada. Canadians are becoming used to talking parrots, mindless responders among all Harperite spokespeople.  As Susan Riley remarked in a recent Hill Times column, an honest, independent Harperite MP cannot be found in Parliament.  They are all programmed puppets.

My favourite choice of puppet, Environment minister Peter Kent, unflaggingly spouts what I take to be a completely ridiculous line of apparent fantasy concerning government policy.  Most environmental experts say the Harper government’s declared goal of reduced environmental pollution is unobtainable nonsense. But Peter Kent repeats it and repeats it … and repeats it.

That points to a serious problem in Canada.  Psychopath-directed government in Canada means that ANY media interview, ANY government statement by ANY cabinet minister, MP, or spokesperson, including Stephen Harper himself – will be used to mislead, deceive, manipulate, and/or otherwise misinform Canadians.

The present Saskatchewan case is, I believe, a major, concerted effort of planning – from the prime minister down – to destroy the work of the a non-partisan electoral boundary commission.

The attack, I believe, began with (apparent) complete innocence in the Procedure and House Affairs Committee.  There, Harperite MP Tom Lukiwski (Regina-Lumsden Lake Centre, Saskatchewan) questioned the work of the commission, making what were probably empty quibbles of the kind that can be surfaced in any electoral boundary change.

Lukiwski suggests they might arrange “hearing objections to the commission’s findings” in the Procedure and House Affairs Committee.  He goes on: “I don’t want to say we’re going to interfere with an arms length commission….” [Hill Times, Jan 28, p. 23]

Then – we know without question – the Conservative majority acted, with apparent subterfuge (and possibly with fraudulent intent), “to interfere with an arms length commission”.

A pattern of what might be supposed to be calculated fraud is clear.

Investigating journalists at the Ottawa Citizen, Glen McGregor and Stephen Maher, set about to find out who was sending an unidentified (illicit) politically partisan “poll” to people in Saskatchewan about their electoral boundaries.

Tom Lukiwski said, of course, that no Saskatchewan MPs were “responsible for the calls”. Of course.

Conservative party spokesman Fred Delorey denied the party was involved at all! Then, as evidence to the contrary grew, Delorey admitted the Harperite Tories made the calls.

Doesn’t it seem clear that Delorey lied? Deliberately?

Asked if his voice-broadcasting companies RackNine [of the 2011 Robocall Election Scandal] and were involved in the Saskatchewan call scandal, Matt Meier, president of RackNine replied: “Thanks for thinking of me, but your fascination is unwarranted.”

As evidence grew, the line sending the Saskatchewan “poll” call was identified as “Chase Research”. Forensic audio expert Ed Primeau said he is “95-per-cent-certain” that “[Matt] Meier recorded the outgoing messages used by the mysterious Chase Research”. Chase Research is connected to RackNine Inc. What does Matt Meier’s statement about “unwarranted” questioning of his participation indicate?  Guess.

And then coincidence became distinctly uncoincidental.  In a spray of language that many Canadians will believe was a Stephen Harper attempt to misinform, mislead, and manipulate, Harper told the House of Commons that his party did nothing wrong.  He said it simply echoed the majority view in Saskatchewan where 75% who submitted opinions to the independent commission were opposed to the proposed changes.

Justice Ron Mills, commission member, denied Harper’s statement, saying “When you start looking at the [submitted opinion] numbers … it’s a mug’s game”.  He went on – as did the commission’s majority report – to point to bias and to [Conservative] MP-encouraged submissions.

The non-coincidence grows.  The 75% figure is obviously a farce.  Nonetheless, independently, Agriculture minister Gerry Ritz said on February 7 that “three quarters of the people of Saskatchewan are upset with the way the maps are drawn.” Ritz tortured the dubious statistic into being the opinion of people all across Saskatchewan –  engaging in patently unfounded nonsense.

Fred Delorey, Conservative party spokesman, admitted the party called for the phone messages.  In his news release Delorey also wrote that the commission’s proposed changes are “opposed by 75% of the public”.  A [planned?] use and repetition of the patently unfounded nonsense?

Non-coincidence.  Follow the dots.  Independently, at different times, Stephen Harper, Fred Delorey, and Gerry Ritz all promulgate what is essentially “disinformation”.  Some would call it the spreading of a lie, or misinformation, or intended distortion, or working together to create a falsehood.

The whole seamy, smelly process leads to five ugly conclusions.

(1) The process – however it may end – serves to call into question fair, impartial electoral boundary setting – on behalf of Harperite boundary-setting by bullying and deception.

(2) The scandal (including the Robocalls) appears to have been a very shady Conservative party-wide activity organized, put in place, and actively supported by Stephen Harper.

(3) Harperite MPs and staffers seem to have been organized and primed to spread the 75% fiction and try to make it “accepted truth”.

(4) Stephen Harper – when against the wall for apparently fraudulent party activity – brought forward the 75% fabrication in order, it seems, to continue the work of destroying a legitimate electoral boundaries commission.

(5) The Saskatchewan electoral boundaries scandal is one part, I believe, of a psychopath-driven attempt by the Stephen Harper cabal to destroy free and fair elections and democratic society in Canada.


There are people in Canada who continue to believe Stephen Harper is not a psychopath.  I am not one of those people.

Contact Robin at:


2013: The “Defunct Economist” and the Psychopathology Of Stephen Harper by Robin Mathews


2013: The “Defunct Economist” and the Psychopathology Of Stephen Harper

By Robin Mathews

2013.  We know a few fundamental truths about human society, now, at a point where we have the most dishonest federal government in Canadian history.

A very few truths must be acted upon if individual and community freedoms are to be maintained, if justice is to be upheld, and if reasonable measures of security, tranquility, and good health are to be assured for all.

The first truth to be noted and acted upon is the one uttered by Lord Acton – that power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely.  That is so in any political (or other) system. We do not act upon that knowledge sufficiently. Power must not be entrusted to any one person or group without automatic and effective safeguards more stringent than any present in so-called ‘democracies’ … or anywhere else.

The second truth we are coming to know is closely related to Acton’s.  It speaks to a medical condition of inequality that must be identified and controlled by equally automatic and effective safeguards.  As I write – by merest coincidence – public debate surrounds the desire of scientists to examine the DNA of a serial murderer to see if there might be an ascertainable genetic composition which guarantees the production of serial murderers.

Freighted with ethical and moral questions, that kind of inquiry won’t abate.  By the same token, research into the presence of psychopaths, sociopaths, and other social psychotics in responsible political and corporate positions has been shaping for a few decades, at least.  The subject is still in flux and strenuously argued over.  But with research of the kind by Robert D. Hare on psychopaths and psychopathy at UBC it won’t go away.

On the one hand, there is the normal person who is swayed by a position of power to become corrupted.  On the other hand, there is the person who is corrupt by nature, devious, power-driven, without conscience, a pathological liar who works hard to mislead and oppress others on his or her way to gaining power as close to absolute power as possible.

One of the assumptions of psychopaths and supporters of a world dominated by psychopaths is that human beings are unequal.  A part of Reactionary (Stephen Harper style) political philosophy insists upon human inequality – though it usually claims to believe in equality before the law.  The economist and self-described political philosopher Friedrich von Hayek (1899-1992) insists upon human inequality.  As might be expected from a Reactionary, an ardent Free Market advocate, and a supporter of neo-liberalism, he does so, I believe, in order to urge the release of specific kinds of people – unfettered, uncontrolled, unsupervised – into economic activity.


               FRIEDRICK AUGUST von HAYEK

The kinds of people he would release and those who champion them, I suggest, may be those who science may well come to prove are psychopaths, sociopaths, and other kinds of social psychotics.

2013. The present brutality and desolation being wrought in the world by corrupt power and deranged leadership are visible to all sane people.  The actions of those “leaders” have come to threaten life as we know it on the planet.  Addressing the problems they present must be of primary importance.

Friedrich von Hayek and his school are a major influence in all reactionary Canadian institutes, think-tanks, in the Canadian Conservative Party, and in the cabinet of Stephen Harper. Aping U.S. neo-liberalism, its economic monopolization of the economy called ‘the Free Market’, its anti-democratic governmental partnering with unchecked corporate power, the Stephen Harper Junta operates a barely disguised despotism in Canada.

In more than one election the Harper Junta has attempted to invalidate free elections by highly organized fraud. Stephen Harper has not shown any alarm at the lawlessness and has done what he can to cover it up. He is believed by many to be a pathological liar, and to force dishonesty upon all the members of his caucus.

In a summing up of the year 2012 in Ottawa, decades-long Ottawa columnist Susan Riley can’t find one honest Harper Conservative in Parliament. (The Hill Times, Dec. 17, 2012, pp. 1,12). Even of promising Chris Alexander, a former Assistant Deputy Minister and “star” candidate, Riley remarks that his claims about the F35 aircraft debate “are transparently and demonstrably false”.  Of ALL the Conservative Members of Parliament she asks: “Is there no limb too long, no lie too outrageous?”

Are those people terrified, robotized beings driven by a psychopathic, sociopathic Junta?

The Harper Junta is rendering Parliament almost ineffective by lies, deceptions and majority-steam-rolling passage of gigantic multi-subject legislation driven by Global Corporate Ideology that wholly discounts Canadians and Canadian interests except when challenged by massive thrusts of public opinion that might threaten to overturn the Junta. In their latest move, the Harper Junta has attempted to gut First Nations rights and freedoms without referring to history or the constitution or existing treaties.

Racist responses on Social Media to First Nations, Idle No More stories are even suspected to be manipulated from Harper Junta sources. Since evidence exists of repeated tawdry and illegal behaviour by Harper supporters no one can categorically deny the claim of Harper-supporter staged racism to inflame public opinion.

Much of the “reasoning” for Stephen Harper Junta policy comes from Friedrich von Hayek and his school.  Von Hayek’s presence in Harper policy-making calls up a statement by economist John Maynard Keynes.  He writes: “Practical men who believe themselves exempt from any intellectual influences, are usually the slaves of some defunct economist.  Madmen in authority, who hear voices in the air, are distilling their frenzy from some academic scribbler of a few years back.”

The “academic scribbler”, “the defunct economist” for the Harper Junta is Friedrich von Hayek.

Friedrich von Hayek believes power corrupts – but only government power exercised on behalf of the well-being of the general population.  His work is dedicated to getting the hands of democratic government away from power and releasing the ‘free individual’, unhindered, into economic activity.

He believes that wealth and poverty are both necessary, apparently so the poverty stricken (by being grossly exploitable) can assist the wealthy to make material advances.  The advances, then, eventually leak down to those among the impoverished who have survived the brutality of their exploitation. It is perhaps no accident that Margaret Thatcher is said to have thrown on the table von Hayek’s book The Constitution of Liberty at a Conservative Party meeting, saying “THIS is what we believe”.

Von Hayek wants strict limits on the powers of government and unions, but almost none on entrepreneurs and corporations.  “There are good reasons why all governmental concern with economic matters is suspect”, he writes. (The Constitution of Liberty, pp. 330-331). He admits that a free system might show concern for the economy within the rule of law.

But … as one might expect, Hayek’s rule of law is Stephen Harper’s.  It is a total sham.  Erecting ‘rule of law’ that can be almost completely eluded by private enterprise is von Hayek’s and Harper’s ideal.  The rule of law must be the basis of a free society, von Hayek, argues.  But any legislation [the making of law] that requires respect for human dignity and human rights von Hayek considers offensive.  Such law-making he consistently attacks and rejects as outside the rule of law!

If that suggests a touch of psychopathy, there is more in von Hayek’s book The Constitution of Liberty (1960) to back up the suspicion.

In the fashion of people who believe all social ideas of fairness and equality are, in fact, the product of selfishness and greed, von Hayek claims the attempts to assure equal opportunity for all rests “to put it bluntly, on envy”. (p. 155)  By the same token, questions about the legitimacy of wealthy people involved in “ostentation”… “bad taste”… and… wastefulness” arise “through envy”.

The idea of progressive taxation in which huge corporate and private profit-makers pay more tax than wage-earners is, he writes, about permitting “gratification of the envy of the less well off” (p. 438)  Progressive taxation for von Hayek, “even elevates into a principle what in fact has no better basis than envy”. (p. 450)

There is something bizarre and twisted about a “political philosopher” seeing only narrow and selfish motivations in the actions of social reformers.  That happens, I suggest, because von Hayek doesn’t possess normal humanity.  He cannot accept that human beings often, at their best, engage in selfless actions.

I think it may be said of von Hayek – and followers like the Stephen Harper Junta – that they have no moral intelligence.  They can learn the phrase “the rule of law”.  They can use it.  But they rebel when law is made that sanctifies something else than The Law of the Jungle by which they wish to live.

If that seems a strong statement, it is backed by von Hayek himself who not only fails to understand the humanitarian motivations of social reformers, but even denies the motivations can exist. “General altruism is a meaningless conception”, he writes (p. 141).”A free man”, von Hayek goes on, can decide for himself “what and whose needs” are important.  He makes clear that the “free man” will decide important needs exist for only a small, closely related few.

That is because the free man, in von Hayek’s view of reality, cannot register as real – cannot understand – what social reformers do over years and what whole segments of the population do at times of earthquake, disease, or other calamities on behalf of people they will never meet – give selflessly and generously to assist.

As if to validate his brutish views of humankind and human community, von Hayek declares that for people like him “the spiritual and temporal are different spheres which ought not to be confused”. (p. 528)  In Western democracies which contain a variety of religious beliefs we ask that the spheres of the Church and State are kept clearly separate.

That isn’t what Friedrich von Hayek means.

He means (as most neo-liberals do) that if the temporal sphere – for him the sphere of economic activity – requires the brutalization of other human beings in order to gain profit, then ideas of justice, mercy, benevolence, sharing, law and love which might come from, say, the spiritual sphere of Christianity must not be permitted “to be confused” with the temporal, economic sphere.

All is of a piece.  Like the “religious” Stephen Harper, von Hayek wouldn’t let the teachings of Christian spirituality get confused with the values of global corporate capitalism.  And, like Stephen Harper, von Hayek reveals that his free society has severe limits.  He is enraged that labour unions possess the right to free association.  He would forbid peaceful picketing (p. 393) as coercive, especially since he argues – as if he believes it – that unions have more power than capitalist enterprises in the Market Economy.  Peaceful picketing offends von Hayek as well because it can be used for “purely political purposes” – as if free association for political purposes is somehow a violation of democratic society.

Friedrich von Hayek finds peaceful picketing offensive as Stephen Harper finds free collective bargaining offensive.  Despite convention, law, and established practice, the Harper Junta has, more than once, erased free collective bargaining in order to assure profit-making by big employers.

Friedrich von Hayek touts the free society.  He extols the rule of law.  He battles for the unhindered activity of the ‘free man’.

But, nevertheless, in his section on education and research von Hayek declares that “a Communist should not be given ‘tenure’” (a permanent position and opportunity for promotion in professorial ranks). (p. 513) The danger is, of course, the person might talk about class [which von Hayek never mentions], class interests, Capitalism, and the role of working people as the providers of “surplus value” – or profits – that corporation owners claim they alone create.

2013. Friedrich von Hayek, it would seem, has planted seeds that have helped lead to a Conservative Party of unrelieved liars in the Canadian Parliament. They undertake wholesale and vicious attacks upon social reformers. They concentrate attacks upon labour unions, give consent to or participate in major law-breaking, and in secret foreign treaty-making. They accept scandalous election violation and repression of information absolutely necessary to democratic society.  They make up a Party in power in which a serious and experienced Ottawa newspaper columnist cannot find a single, honest, upright person.

Welcome Canadians to 2013 in Canada.


Contact Robin: Robin Mathews <>

The Real Enemy



Ian V. Macdonald writes: This is an excellent series of questions.  Hundreds more could be raised including the heavy involvement of Israel in the international drug trade, tax evasion swindles, bribery and subversion, fraud in all its forms, white slavery, smuggling, organ harvesting, and virtually all other criminal activities imaginable.  It is deplorable that America (and Canada) protect and support such diabolical creatures but the Israelis are now in such complete control in both Washington and Ottawa (to say nothing of other “democratic” governments) that there is nothing decent people can do to unseat them, short of revolution.  Ian



Question: Which country in the Middle East refuses to sign the nuclear non-proliferation treaty and bars international inspections?

Answer: Israel .

Question: Which country in the Middle East seized the sovereign territory of other nations by military force and continues to occupy it in defiance of United Nations Security Council resolutions?

Answer: Israel .

Question: Which country in the Middle East routinely violates the international borders of another sovereign state with warplanes and artillery and naval gunfire?

Answer: Israel .

Question: What American ally in the Middle East has for years sent assassins into other countries to kill its political enemies (a practice sometimes called exporting terrorism)?

Answer: Israel 

Question: In which country in the Middle East have high-ranking military officers admitted publicly that unarmed prisoners of war were executed?

Answer: Israel .

Question: What country in the Middle East refuses to prosecute its soldiers who have acknowledged executing prisoners of war?

Answer: Israel .

Question: What country in the Middle East created millions of refugees and refuses to allow them to return to their homes, farms and businesses?

Answer: Israel .

Question: What country in the Middle East refuses to pay compensation to people whose land, bank accounts and businesses it confiscated?

Answer: Israel .

Question: In what country in the Middle East was a high-ranking United Nations diplomat assassinated?

Answer: Israel .

Question: In what country in the Middle East did the man who ordered the assassination of a high-ranking U.N. diplomat become prime minister?

Answer: Israel .

Question: What country in the Middle East blew up an American diplomatic facility in Egypt and attacked a U.S. ship, the USS Liberty, in international waters, killing 34 and wounding 171 American sailors?

Answer: Israel .

Question: What country in the Middle East employed a spy, Jonathan Pollard, to steal classified documents from USA and then gave some of them to the Soviet Union ?

Answer: Israel .

Question: What country at first denied any official connection to Pollard, then voted to make him a citizen and has continuously demanded that the American president grant Pollard a full pardon?

Answer: Israel .

Question: What Middle East country allows American Jewish murderers to flee to its country to escape punishment in the United States and refuses to extradite them once in their custody?

Answer: Israel .

Question: What Middle East country preaches against hate yet builds a shrine and a memorial for a murderer who killed 29 Palestinians while they prayed in their Mosque?

Answer: Israel .

Question: What country on Planet Earth has the second most powerful lobby in the United States , according to a recent Fortune magazine survey of Washington insiders?

Answer: Israel .

Question: Which country in the Middle East deliberately targeted a civilian U.N. Refugee Camp in Qana , Lebanon and killed 103 innocent men, women, and especially children?

Answer: Israel .

Question: Which country in the Middle East is in defiance of 69 United Nations Security Council resolutions and has been protected from 29 more by U.S. vetoes?

Answer: Israel .

Question: Which country in the Middle East receives more than one-third of all U.S. aid to the world yet is the 16th richest country in the world?

Answer: Israel .

Question: Which country in the Middle East receives U.S. weapons for free and then sells the technology to the Republic of China even at the objections of the U.S. ?

Answer: Israel 

Question: Which country in the Middle East routinely insults the American people by having its Prime Minister address the United States Congress and lecturing them like children on why they have no right to reduce foreign aid?

Answer: Israel .

Question: Which country in the Middle East had its Prime Minister announce to his staff not to worry about what the United States says because, “We control America ?”

Answer: Israel .

Question: What country in the Middle East was cited by Amnesty International for demolishing more than 4000 innocent Palestinian homes as a means of ethnic cleansing?

Answer: Israel .

Question: Which country in the Middle East has just recently used a weapon of mass destruction, a one-ton smart bomb, dropping it in the center of a highly populated area killing 15 civilians including 9 children?

Answer: Israel .

Question: Which country in the Middle East routinely kills young Palestinian children for no reason other than throwing stones at armored vehicles, bulldozers, or tanks?

Answer: Israel .

Question: Which country in the Middle East signed the Oslo Accords promising to halt any new Jewish Settlement construction, but instead, has built more than 270 new settlements since the signing?

Answer: Israel .

Question: Which country in the Middle East has assassinated more than 100 political officials of its opponent in the last 2 years while killing hundreds of civilians in the process, including dozens of children?

Answer: Israel .

Question: Which country in the Middle East regularly violates the Geneva Convention by imposing collective punishment on entire towns, villages, and camps, for the acts of a few, and even goes as far as demolishing entire villages while people are still in their homes?

Answer: Israel .






by Robin Mathews

January 27, 2012

Don’t talk.  Act.  Don’t turn away … to other things.  We all – or most of us – do that.  We won’t look painful truth in the face.  We … can’t. We turn away … almost forced to do so by our fears.

But, now, we have no choice.  Global heating is upon us, and will erase human life from the planet – which will go on whirling through space without us. Good science states that as fact. The subject, here, is the imminent destruction of human life on the planet.

Paleontologists are looking at dinosaur footprints from 120 million years ago.  Humankind has been significant on the planet for (generously) 20,000 years.  In that 20,000 years humankind has raced forward … towards destruction.  As poetic theorists put it humankind has the moral development of just-beyond-apes and the scientific development of a superpeople.  A murderous combination.

We just-beyond-ape people want a pecking order, want a power hierarchy … perhaps need it. That doesn’t have to be wrong, if it’s balanced and restrained. But some are driven by greed, animosity, lust, fear, desire to dominate.  They often succeed in dominating. And then they work to undermine law, convention, justice, and fairness. But not all are like that. When the ones driven by greed, animosity, lust, fear, and a desire to dominate reach the power apex, they go mad – as is the case now – insane.  Power tends to corrupt; absolute power corrupts absolutely.  Absolute corruption loses all moral base.

[Read more…]

The Rotten State of Law and The Courts In Canada: Madness

rotten state

The Rotten State of Law and The Courts In Canada: Madness

By Robin Mathews

January 12, 2012

The higher (and other) courts in B.C. are in the news again – this time because of the almost ridiculous state of financial deprivation the Gordon Campbell/Christy Clark government has put the court system into. Courts are starving.  Judges are in short supply.  Staff is minimal.  Legal Aid support is a disgrace.  Serious cases are being tossed as a result of unacceptable delay.  Justice is being denied ….

Major court commentator (Vancouver Sun) Ian Mulgrew trivializes the situation by using it to insult a lawyer trying to do something to ease the injustice.  Madness.  But madness is afoot in a British Columbia staggering from high-level corruption.  And the madness is incarnated in the Mainstream Press and Media, as Ian Mulgrew shows.

Begin by recognizing a fundamental point. Good, effective (especially) higher courts are a threat to corrupt governments and corporations.  There could be a direct connection between that fact and the starving of the courts in B.C.

The rule of law is under attack in Canada – led by the Stephen Harper government which eludes justice in cases against it and laughs in the face of law, contract, and decency.  Maybe I should say “led by the Stephen Harper government which is following the Gordon Campbell/Christy Clark government that violated the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms in its first years by attempting to smash unions – breaking contract with the hospital employees union and denying teachers fundamental bargaining rights”. Both actions have been overturned by the courts. Christy Clark has yet to restore the rights of teachers, even after a Supreme Court of B.C. order more than a year ago.

How’s that for open contempt for the rule of law by the Christy Clark government? Open, public rejection of a Supreme Court order.

The BC Rail Scandal trial of Dave Basi, Bobby Virk, and Aneal Basi threatened the survival of the Gordon Campbell/Christy Clark government and many of their “cooperating” corporate associates.  The trial was dubiously conducted from the beginning of pre-trial hearings.  It was slammed shut four years later in a way that has scandalized even usually unobserving Canadians.

We’ll look at that – and at the B.C. Attorney General’s attempts to get – (and getting) – “independent” whitewashes of deeply soiled processes involving top government officers.

What do we know about the corrupt state of the Basi, Virk, and Basi trial?

(1) We know material placed on public record was kept from the public, to protect, I believe, wrongly, a number of people.

(2) We know the court operates a “journalist accreditation” process that uses Mainstream Press and Media journalists as court officers, giving them illegitimate judicial power, and guaranteeing they will act in major conflict of interest.

(3) We know that the Special (Crown) Prosecutor, key to the later investigations in the BC Rail Scandal case and to the charges laid against the accused – as well as their prosecution in court – was appointed in clear violation of the legislation governing the appointment of Special Prosecutors.  He was, in short, illegitimately in the court conducting cases arising out of the BC Rail Scandal.

(4) We know the removal (by promotion) and replacement of Madame Justice Elizabeth Bennett in the Basi, Virk, and Basi case involved a motion made by the illegitimate Special Prosecutor presented to Associate Chief Justice Patrick Dohm to have her removed.  And we know that Associate Chief Justice Dohm declared in that process that he had Bennett’s replacement all ready (obviously before the hearing even occurred to present the motion).

(5) We know that the Chief Justice, the Associate Chief Justice, and the judge on the Basi, Virk, and Basi trial received formal notice (with evidence) that the Special Prosecutor was appointed in violation of the legislation governing appointments and was, therefore, illegitimately in the court and that his wrongful appointment made the pre-trial hearings and the trial itself illegitimate.  The Chief Justice, the Associate Chief Justice and the judge on the Basi, Virk, and Basi case did not deny the facts presented, but they refused to act. Madness.

6) We know the people in the three positions were informed again formally. [Patrick Dohm had retired as Associate Chief Justice and Anne MacKenzie was raised to that position.]  Once again major judges of the Supreme Court of British Columbia refused to act in any way. Once again, they did not deny the evidence presented to them.  Associate Chief Justice Anne MacKenzie replaced Elizabeth Bennett as judge on the case, and permitted the illegitimate Special Prosecutor to remain.

(7) We know the evidence of the wrongful appointment of the Special Prosecutor was presented to the Attorney General’s office and that the Assistant Deputy Attorney General replied by saying – falsely – that the Attorney General’s office could not act because the matter was sub judice.  The appointment of William Berardino as Special Prosecutor was never sub judice.

(8) We know I wrote to Attorney General Michael de Jong and asked for a reply on the matter from him.  I received no answer.

(9) We know I wrote to the Canadian Judicial Council – final resource in Canada for complaints of judicial misconduct – and reported Associate Chief Justice Anne MacKenzie was guilty of misconduct for allowing the illegitimate Special Prosecutor to act in her courtroom.

(10) We know that the Chief Justice of the Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench (Supreme Court), Neil C.Wittmann, replied for the Canadian Judicial Council in the words of his court officer.  He judged the complaint was not a matter of conduct and so was dismissed.  He added that he had no opinion about the matter of William Berardino’s wrongful appointment.  Chief Justice Wittmann is a member, as Associate Chief Justice MacKenzie is, of the Canadian Judicial Council.

(11) We know that Attorney General Michael de Jong (who refused to reply to my correspondence) set up UBC Vice-president Stephen Owen to do a two-month review of the Special Prosecutor process. What I believe was the cover-up move came when Terrence Robertson, looking into allegations of election misconduct in the case of Kash Heed, Liberal candidate, had to resign for an alleged conflict of interest. Though informed of the William Berardino matter while doing his review, Stephen Owen never made any acknowledgement. He completed his Report  in July 2010, without mentioning the major appointment violation in William Berardino’s case.

Stephen Owen reported the Special Prosecutor process is in good health.

Michael de Jong got the whitewash that I believe he sought.

(12) We know that the next Attorney General Barry Penner asked President and Vice-Chancellor of UBC Stephen J. Toope in May of 2011 to review the process for granting indemnities to cover legal costs of B.C. public servants.  I believe Attorney General Penner wanted a whitewash of the astounding payment made to cover the costs of two of the convicted in the Basi, Virk, and Basi case – six million dollars.

The appointment of officers of the University of British Columbia , I insist, to do work for the B.C. government, creates a clear conflict of interest. The B.C. government has power over UBC, and could bring it to its knees if it wanted to do so. An officer of UBC is in a master/servant relation with the B.C. government. Legal theory says that a servant cannot act independently in relation to his or her master, and cannot be believed to do so.  And yet Stephen Owen, UBC Vice-President, and now Stephen J. Toope, President and Vice-Chancellor of UBC, both lawyers, both informed about matters of conflict of interest, both accepted “tasks” from government in which they were to judge “independently” government actions and processes.  Madness. They are a part of the madness.

The two top officers of UBC, I allege, have tainted themselves with the corruption of the Gordon Campbell/Christy Clark government.

In a move to clean himself and to be something other than he is, Stephen J. Toope presents his report as “Professor”, not as President and Vice-Chancellor.  He is, in effect, claiming that he isn’t acting as President and Vice-Chancellor but as a mere, powerless professor.  That pose would stand up in a court of law for about 13 seconds.  It is rubbish.

In his report written, it seems, not from B.C. but from lawyer fantasyland, Toope tells us the Attorney General (in B.C.! ! ) “provides impartial and independent legal advice to government”.

He goes on to acknowledge that his review was brought about in some degree by “public interest in the indemnities granted to Messrs. Basi and Virk in criminal proceedings against them.” (p. 2)  And he admits there is some focus on their case as well as others.

He clears the Ministry of the Attorney General of suspicion, not referring to any other aspect of the astounding “deal” that closed the trial and avoided cross-examination of many people the public suspects of criminal behaviour.  Toope writes:

“Using firmly established common law method, the officials charged with exercising discretion have justified their decisions by drawing out principles present in existing cases and analogizing those principles to new circumstances.  As far as I can tell from the documents to which I had access, the results to date have been principled….” (p.29)

In two sentences, President and Vice-Chancellor Toope white-washes the actions of the Gordon Campbell/Christy Clark government in the matter of the $6 million payment for the costs of Basi and Virk.  Madness.

No wonder the present Attorney General, Shirley Bond, declared herself delighted with the Report!

And then there’s Ian Mulgrew.  He admits the court system is in terrible shape.  He admits angry court staff are beginning to withdraw services to focus on the refusal of the Gordon Campbell/Christy Clark government to do ANYTHING.

And so Ian Mulgrew attacks Kevin McCullough who flies to Vancouver to get the release of jailed people – “doing duty counsel services” – who cannot get to trial.  And he attacks McCullough because he was counsel for Bobby Virk in the BC Rail Scandal trial and – in bargaining with Special Prosecutor (?) William Berardino  – got a financial deal for his client on payment for services.

Ian Mulgrew has never reported that William Berardino was appointed Special Prosecutor in violation of the legislation covering such appointments.  He has never reported Associate Chief Justice Anne MacKenzie refused to act on the fact of an illegitimate Special Prosecutor in her court.  Madness – and, I would say – a failure of journalistic integrity, too.

But he draws a picture for his readers of “celebrity Victoria lawyer Kevin McCullough [looking] like Mother Teresa flying to Vancouver to help spring the poor, the indigent, the unfairly locked up….”

Then – missing the point completely – Mulgrew gives the instance of a fellow with 78 convictions, arrested on “sex assault, assault and threatening charges” who Kevin McCullough got released.

But of course he did!  When the legal and court system fail, ALL the jailed (not yet tried and judged, and so, in our system, innocent) are done injustice.  It is easy for the irresponsible to say “why shouldn’t THIS ONE stay in jail.  I don’t like the look of him or her”.  But that a major commentator on law and the courts for a major Canadian newspaper would suggest that kind of thing is … well  … Madness. Madness.


Contact Robin Mathews at

Imagine There’s No Harper

Brought to you by our musical friends at Anonymous World Headquarters, BC.

Please click on the url to view the video.


Hating Harper by Arthur Topham


Hating Harper

By Arthur Topham

April 27, 2011


“What constitutes “hatred” is not defined in the Canadian Human Rights Act. It is a question of fact.
It is generally accepted to refer to extreme ill-will and is an emotion which allows for “no redeeming qualities” in the person at whom it is directed.
“Contempt” is similarly extreme and includes circumstances in which the object of one’s feelings is looked down upon, belittled, despised, dishonored or disgraced.”

~ email excerpt from Sandy Kozak, Investigator, CHRC to Arthur Topham, Pub/Ed of, Dec. 10, 2007

“What kills a skunk is the publicity it gives itself.”
~ Abraham Lincoln

“But when you want money for people with minds that hate,
All I can tell you brother is that you have to wait.”

~The Beatles, Revolution, 1968


Plainly stated Canada is a Zionist Jew-controlled colony of the state of Israel. In terms of the alternative media such a designation is referred to as a “ZOG” nation, i.e. “Zionist Occupied Government.” While hidden for over six decades from the majority of Canadians by the Zionist-controlled media’s ‘Iron Curtain’ of deception it is nonetheless an established fact and a reality that must be faced if the nation is to ever recover its former independence and sovereignty.

Anyone who desires to dispute this assertion has to explain and justify to the people of Canada why there is not a single federal political party in the country willing to stand up to the Zionist Jew lobby that now wields such a sinister political influence upon the nation. To attempt a negation of the argument without speaking to this issue can only be construed as evasion and denial.

In the thick of yet another federal election, with Harper and his Conservative party striving with utmost intent to gain a majority government, this pseudo-Semitic elephant in the midst of Canada’s political/judicial/cultural/social living room blithely goes about its business of knocking over, crushing and destroying the country’s constitutional rights along with trammeling upon its domestic and foreign policies, all the while aided and abetted in its traitorous actions by a colluding, fifth column ‘mainstream’ media; itself but another monopoly controlled weapon within the Zionist’s plethoric armory of subterfuge and deception.

History, once freed from the controlling machinations of the Zionist Jews and re-established upon the firm foundations of actual, factual truth, will one day support this seemingly radical view of Canada.

The overall subject of the Zionist Jew’s seditious back-room dealings within Canada’s political, social, cultural and economic infrastructure in favour of Israel and Zionism’s stated goal of creating a one world government is much too complex an issue to deal with in one short essay and, needs be, must be highlighted here by a focus on just one aspect of their sell-out of Canada’s sovereignty to the foreign interests of the state of Israel; that being the lobby’s relentless attack upon Canadians’ constitutional, God-given right to freedom of speech, especially as it pertains to the internet.

Over the past three decades and longer there has been a slow, steady, incremental, subversive process taking place within Canada’s federal judiciary designed to weave into the warp and woof of Canada’s Constitution Act, Charter of Rights and Freedoms and miscellaneous human rights acts, legislation that would at first appear benign and beneficial to the nation as a whole but ultimately, in the end, when push came to shove and the population began waking up to the fact that their country was being unduly influenced and coerced and manipulated by the Zionist Jews within its borders, this seemingly laudable legislation would suddenly shape shift into what it was originally designed to be: a set of draconian, totalitarian laws having one, and only one, purpose in mind: to protect and justify all of the insidious actions on the part of the federal government and its representatives that continually bring not only increased power and influence to the Zionist Jew lobbies themselves but foremost, to their official handler, the racist, supremacist, apartheid state of Israel. This, I submit, is and was the sole intention of the “human rights” legislation here in Canada. Everything else related to the subject is subsidiary and mere window dressing to satisfy the gullible, the marginalized and the intelligentsia. It is a classic case of Zionism in action and also a reflection of the very same process used throughout the first half of the 20th century to gain, via similar subterfuge, the Arab lands now known as the ‘state of Israel’.

The rather graphic, controversial image above that accompanies this essay is meant to represent many of those players who are, in one way or another, secretly and subversively playing a role in undermining Canada’s sovereignty and allowing the Zionist Jews now residing within its borders to wield a level of undue influence that is quickly destroying Canada’s ability to stand in the world as an independent and sovereign nation. The results of this unhealthy and egregious relationship between the atheistic, criminal state of Israel are clearly portrayed in the bloody imagery symbolized by Harper’s appearance in the aforesaid humourless cartoon. Necessity, at this point in our history, and in the face of all that the Zionist-controlled media is doing to manipulate this realistic image of the Harper government and its Zionist controllers, justifies such an apparently raw, grotesque portrait of Canada’s Prime Minister.

The start…

Over the past five years I and my website have been involved in a deadly struggle with the Jewish lobby here in Canada. This explains why I’ve chosen the topic of freedom of speech to illustrate my thesis that the Harper Conservative government, the most unabashed and blatantly manipulated of all the federal parties to date, must be resisted by the electorate in the most adamant manner possible and prevented from establishing a majority in the House of Commons come May 2, 2011.

My case, I feel, illustrates most succinctly and clearly the intent of the current “anti-hate,”  anti-free speech legislation now contained within the Canadian Human Rights Act and known as “Section 13.” I propose to show the discerning reader how it all ties in with the present and the proposed legislation of the Harper Conservative government with respect to laws enacted concerning “anti-Semitism”, “racism” and “hate crimes.”

On November 20th, 2007, while operating a small renovation business in British Columbia, Canada, I was on an out-of-town job when I got a phone call from my wife informing me that I had received a large, white, unaddressed envelope containing what appeared to be legal documents from the Canadian Human Rights Commission (CHRC).

Being unable to return home immediately I asked her to look the papers over and see what they were all about. She did and informed me that a Jewish group in Canada by the name “League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada” and the group’s B.C. representative, had filed a complaint with the CHRC regarding myself and my website The precise wording of the allegations, as stated in the document, read:

“We wish to file a complaint with the Canadian Human Rights Commission seeking relief for discriminatory publication under prohibited grounds caught by Section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act.

The premise of this complaint is a contention that Arthur Topham of Quesnel, British Columbia, Canada and his internet publication known as  “”  contrive to promote ongoing hatred affecting persons identifiable as Jews and/or as citizens of Israel.”

It should be noted and must be noted immediately the precise wording of the premise for the complaint. This Jewish lobby group, actually a secret, Jewish masonic order under the auspices of B’nai Brith International (created by the Rothschild Jewish banking cartel back in the mid-19th century) was using the Canadian Human Rights Act’s notoriously worded Sec. 13 to claim that I was promoting “hatred affecting persons identifiable as Jews and/or as citizens of Israel.”

The bold, italicized, phrase, “citizens of Israel” is the operative term to keep in mind throughout this article regarding the Jewish lobbies’ efforts to undermine our democratic structure in Canada. What we’re witnessing here,  for the first time in Canadian jurisprudence, is a precedent-setting case wherein the Jewish lobbyists, conspiring with a foreign country, Israel, are claiming that it is illegal and criminal on the part of a Canadian citizen to openly criticize the FOREIGN state of Israel and that to do so should be construed by Canadians as “promoting hatred”!


From that point in November of 2007 until today I have been embroiled in an extended legal battle to defend my constitutional right to freedom of speech and to retain my freedom, as a Canadian citizen, to criticize and expose any individual, group or nation that poses a direct or indirect threat to the sovereignty of the nation that I, as a loyal member, am morally, ethically and legally bound to defend and preserve. It should also be noted by readers that since this case began it has been completely blacked out in the Zionist media, aka the ‘mainstream media’.

It has not been an easy task going up against the most powerful lobby group in the world. One need only think of the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) in the USA, which is one arm of B’nai Brith International, to realize the extend and influence of this Jewish secret society. At the onset of the complaint by the “League” I was already surviving financially in a marginal manner. Winter was setting in and funds were low when suddenly I was confronted with a legal attack by international Zionism and world Jewry. It was a scenario not all together that unlike the proverbial David and Goliath story.

Contained in the documents of the unmarked white envelope were instructions to respond to the complaint within a period of weeks or else face being unilaterally excluded from the quasi-judicial process that was about to unfold whether I liked it or not. I had no choice but to stop working and do my utmost to defend myself by whatever means at my disposal.

The most crucial factor of course was the fact that I was unable to hire a lawyer to defend myself against the charges. That meant I had to assume that role myself and thus began a protracted period of learning all of the legal aspects of dealing with such a complaint. It also meant that I would have to give up any future employment until the case was resolved, a double-bind situation that, to say the least, was demanding and enervating and put me behind an 8-ball of financial insecurity that continues to exist up to the point of these words being typed.

Of course I soon learned that my case, although unique in the sense that I’ve explained above, was not the only case of its kind occurring in Canada. There were others, actually clandestine cases wherein even Jews were apparently involved in similar Sec. 13 pseudo-law suits. I’m referring here to those of Mark Steyn and Ezra Levant, two Zionist Jews of Canadian origins who for similar reasons had offended another group, this time the Moslems. Both of their cases played out in the Zionist media over the period of my own trials and tribulations but due to the fact that they were part of the conspiracy itself these two Zionist conspirators were absolved from their supposed crimes. Unfortunately for all the rest of the Canadians who weren’t members of the self-chosen fraternity of Zionist Jews but were also accused of similar indiscretions they weren’t so lucky.

Most uninformed, yet decent, Canadians have no idea of just how corrupt the human rights commissions have become as a result of Zionist intrigues within the legal system. Since these organizations began trying to control the thoughts of Canadians a total of 100 complaints were received by the CHRC and out of that 37 cases were ruled on by the CHR Tribunal. What may interest free speech advocates are the following facts regarding the victims:

•  NOT A SINGLE respondent has ever won a section 13 case before the tribunal.
•  100% of cases have Whites as respondents

•  98% of cases have poor or working class respondents

•  90.7% of respondents are not represented by lawyers

•  So far, $93,000 has been awarded in fines and special compensation since 2003.

•  35 respondents have lifetime speech bans (Cease and Desist) orders and if not followed the victims could face up to 5 years in prison.

•  72.4% of complaints specifically identify “jews” as victims.

•  Truth is NO DEFENSE when attempting to justify one’s opinions and writings

•  48.8% of all cases are by one complainant (all but 1 case since 2002)

Throughout all the legal battles and media hype one thing became excruciatingly clear for all the non-Israeli, dual citizen respondents (defendants). The deck was stacked in favour of the Zionist Jew regardless of who had been accused of what particular “hate crime”. The most notorious of those laying an assortment of sundry hate crimes charges, using Section 13 of the CHR Act, was a former lawyer for the Canadian Human Rights Commission. His forte was to use stealth combined with the Zionist Jew constructed boogieman known as the “neo-Nazi” to slither forth on to websites under aliases and then, via subterfuge and lies, entrap others to write something that he could then use as “evidence” to subsequently lay a “hate crimes” charge against the person or the website owner. This same method, by the way, was also being used by CHRC officials to accomplish similar ends; a sort of make-work project for the organizations.

It was a very lucrative scam for he had not only the legal wherewithal to snare his unsuspecting victims but also the full backing of the Canadian Human Rights Commission and the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal, both of which had been carefully crafted over decades to fulfill the exact agenda that now was unfolding across the nation where any individual or group who tried to explain to their fellow Canadians the truth about the Jewish lobby and the racist, apartheid, warlike actions of the Jewish state was liable to be charged under this section of the CHR Act for promoting “hatred” toward “Jews”. How convenient, now that the realities of Zionism were finally gaining momentum globally on the one medium of communication that the Zionists still were unable to fully control, i.e. the internet, that such a law was on the books to protect the guilty.

Apart from the injustice of such a specious piece of “human rights” legislation, which actually acted as a safeguard and protective shield for the guilty party, recent precedents set over the past couple of decades of legal cases also insured that victims of a Section 13 “hate crime” could, and usually would, be saddled with not only restrictions on their right to self-expression but also hefty fines. It was here that he was found to be exploiting this questionable practice to the utmost and as a result reaping the ignominy of those battling to have this unjust Section 13 repealed.

Continuing on through 2008 and 2009 my case slowly wended its way through the quasi-legal channels wherein flow these two infamous rivers of Zionist deception, the CHRC and the CHRT. By the grace of God I was able to obtain free legal assistance from Canada’s internationally renowned human rights and freedom of speech lawyer Mr. Douglas Christie, of Victoria, B.C. Thanks to Mr. Christie’s organization, known as the Canadian Free Speech League (CFSL), his assistance from early on in my ordeal with the Jewish mafia who control the Harper government proved vital and beneficial to my case.

On top of that I was also fortunate to have another organization in Canada known as the Canadian Association for Free Expression (CAFE) under the direction of Paul Fromm also intervene on my behalf. Both these courageous and much-maligned organizations (by the Zionist media) worked with me in my deliberations with the CHR Commission and then with the CHR Tribunal and are still, like myself, awaiting word on another Section 13 case involving the same lawyer and Marc Lemire, one which, thanks to a decision by Tribunal member, Athanasios Hadjis on September 1, 2009, had the salubrious effect of eventually staying my own case in the spring of 2010 pending the final outcome in the federal court system of the CHRC’s appeal in the Blank v Lemire case.

And… today

Throughout the past few years of battling with the CHRC and the CHRT various freedom of speech groups and individuals have worked hard to keep the subject of the internet censorship alive and to inform the public of the imminent threat that exists within the coiled Zionist serpent now operating behind the public view in Ottawa and working in tandem with the Harper Conservative government.

Apart from all the vile, treasonous and demeaning statements made by PM Stephen Harper in the media with respect to the state of Israel and to Canada’s foreign policy which ultimately led to our nation being booted out of the UN security council; and apart from all the scandals involving Immigration minister Jason Kenney and Co. and the government’s financial punishment of any Canadian groups desirous of helping the Palestinian people, the Zionist Jews have been working relentlessly and surreptitiously to further their mendacious censorship objectives within parliament itself under the guise of yet another coalition of willing bigots, hypocrites and traitors who have chosen a sycophantic relationship with the Jewish lobbyists over truth, honesty and justice for Canada.

Calling themselves the “Inter-Parliamentary Coalition for Combating Antisemitism (ICCA)” and working in concert with such notable Israel First zealots as former (Zionist Jew) Canadian Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada, Irwin Cotler, [below, center stage at table] this small group of Canadian parliamentarians have been conspiring with other parliaments in Great Britain, and the EU as well as the US government to implement even greater amounts of repressive legislation to silence those who see through the Big Lie of the Zionist Jews and are intent on exposing it to fellow Canadians and the world at large. Their endless, worn-out cry of “anti-Semitism! anti-Semitism! anti-Semitism!” which they chant over and over like a group of Hari Krishnas on methedrine throughout the halls of Canada’s parliament and in their controlled media in the vain hope that all the rest of Canada will join them is but one more exercise in futility on their part and an even greater expression of their ultimate duplicity toward Canadian democracy.

Back row (left to right): Congressman Chris Smith (USA), Minister Yuli Edelstein (Israel), Guillaume Ngefa (Democratic Republic of Congo),
Gert Weisskirchen (Germany), MP Vivienne Teitelbaum (Belgium), Father Nortbert Hofmann (The Vatican)
Front row (left to right): Hon. Dr. Fiamma Nirenstein, MP (Italy), Hon. Irwin Cotler, MP (Canada), MP John Mann (UK)

And so here the problem stands. While our democratic institutions are being ripped apart and shredded from within by the Zionist Jews who control Canada’s government there’s not a single federal political party with the conviction or the intestinal wherewithal to stand up for Canada and speak out on this critical issue.

It truly poses some interesting moral and ethical dilemma’s for those who want to see Canada return to a state of independence, sovereignty and integrity.

In the beginning was the word and the word was “hate”

“What constitutes “hatred” is not defined in the Canadian Human Rights Act. It is a question of fact.
It is generally accepted to refer to extreme ill-will and is an emotion which allows for “no redeeming qualities” in the person at whom it is directed.
“Contempt” is similarly extreme and includes circumstances in which the object of one’s feelings is looked down upon, belittled, despised, dishonored or disgraced.”

~ excerpt from an email from Sandy Kozak, Investigator, CHRC to Arthur Topham, Pub/Ed of, Dec. 10, 2007

The Zionist Jews, of all the vested interest lobby groups in Canada (and the USA, Great Britain, EU and Australia, New Zealand, etc.), are the ones who promote, exploit and benefit from the four-letter word “hate”. Like the original term “anti-Semitism,” (also coined back in the late 19th Century for similar political purposes), the use and abuse of this latest linguistic lure to further their one world government agenda is too transparently recognizable to overlook. It’s one of their main sources of propaganda, giving them the much needed chutzpah to plod on in their disingenuous and endless quest for more and more power and control over the democratic nations of the world. Unfortunately it’s a ruse that is as false as all the other ruses that they use over and over to befuddle and confuse the minds of the unaware and brainwashed.

As is apparent in the definition of the term which Sandy Kozak, “hate crimes” Investigator for the Canadian Human Rights Commission, conveyed to me upon request, what constitutes “hatred” isn’t defined in the CHR Act. As she says, “It is a question of fact.” Really? A question of fact? Like a rock on the ground? Like a tree in the bush? Like a mole on a cheek? Like a car on a road? Like a dead Palestinian child in the ditch? Or, as is more likely the case, like an aberrant thought, hidden in the undefinable depths of a psychopath’s mind? I suggest that the type of “fact” which Sandy Kozak was referring to in her email of 2007 was akin to the latter in the list.

Hate, in the eyes of the CHRC and, theoretically, in the minds of those who inserted and imposed it upon the Canadian public via the CHR Act, is an “emotion”, “extreme ill-will” that supposedly includes no possibility of any “redeeming qualities” in the person who may be the recipient of this emotion. Don’t you just hate it when suspect sophists take a word, manipulate and crunch it up and distort and twist it into a particular shape and then expect the rest of the world to unconditionally accept it in its “brand new” form as the one and only definition worthy of consideration? I certainly do.

Well that is precisely how the human rights commissars conceive the word “hate” will be understood by Canadians and that is why the Zionist agents, working in earnest within their committees and their “think” tanks, demand and expect that the quasi-judicial bodies like the CHRC and the CHRT will ensure that this word, above all words, remains poised at the zenith of their “Hallmarks of Hate” like the sword of Damocles which they use to determine whether or not someone’s words or deeds fits into the linguistic straight jacket that they’ve so carefully contrived over years and years of deceptive deliberations behind the scenes.

But, like all fanatics, the Zionist Jews are not content to have just one term with which to silence their critics and so they solicited yet another word, “contempt”, to add to their arsenal of prohibited language. Now this second linguistic bombshell is also considered much too “extreme” an emotion for all the good little goys and gals to be feeling should their world and/or their country be crumbling before their eyes and such feelings of outrage, anger, disgust suddenly begin to arise from within their beings. As a theoretically free and sovereign nation of people we must not; we can not; even though the very actions and behaviour of the Zionist Jews within our nation are putting us in a position where we are being belittled, despised, dishonoured, disgraced, deceived, disenfranchised, deluded, robbed, poisoned, lied to, cheated, and disempowered; be allowed to legitimately feel emotions such as hatred or contempt toward those responsible for our plight. Just how sick, twisted and contemptible this truly is I will leave up to the reader to decide.

It would be fair, I believe, to assume that there are literally thousands or possibly millions of Canadians who find not only the sight but the actions of Stephen Harper and the Conservative government to be so repulsive as to bring forth at least one of these prohibited emotions. Contempt rather than fear springs to mind immediately. To do so; to feel so; I suggest, is not an unhealthy thing but merely a strong indication that within the human breast of Canadians there still resides the eternal spirit of resistance to tyranny; a spirit that holds fast to the belief that no government has the right to lay claims upon the inner light or spirit that guides each and every one of us through this darkened world of treachery, war, destruction, deceit and misery. We were given these immutable qualities at the beginning of our sojourn upon this planet in order that we would never be forced into living as slaves under any particular power group, be they Zionists, Communists, Conservatives, Liberals or otherwise and we must never forget them.

To conclude

All this said I still feel, from a personal perspective, that to hate is not the best motive for rationalizing or acting. To love (and be loved) and to be moved by feelings of love to stand up and resist all that the hatred created by the Zionist Juggernaut brings forth in this world is a much stronger, truer basis upon which to not only think and reason but also to live and be and to motivate one’s actions.

Israel’s star is on the wane. It has, as once was prognosticated by the Jewish writer Nathan Weinstock, turned out to be, like political Zionism itself, a “false messiah”; a deceiver of nations and the offspring of the Synagogue of Satan. Thus it would be a grave error on the part of Canada to hitch its nationhood – government and reputation within the community of free nations – to Israel’s failing influence. As Lord Curzon once stated: “It must never be forgotten that a nation, to be great, must pay due regard to the fact that it must build up its greatness on the foundation of the eternal verities of truth and justice.” In the case of the illegally created state of Israel, and as time will eventually prove, these words are more apt than any to describe the Zionist’s futile attempt to take over and institute a New World Order.

PM Stephen Harper with skullcap surrounded by the extremist Jewish Talmud cult known as the
Chabad Lubavich – the hidden advisors controlling the Harper government.

The Conservative government of Stephen Harper is a contemptible Trojan Horse. Like previous governments it was dragged into Ottawa under the pretense of being the best option for Canadians to preserve not only their integrity as a free and democratic nation but to set a good example for the rest of the world; one that other nations might look up to and aspire after in the hope that someday they would also reap the benefits that a free society and sovereign democracy can offer to its people. This has not been the case. As we can see from the graphic immediately above there is a specific, self-chosen group of zealots who, through subterfuge and the power of their usurious ‘purse’ plus their Babylonian Talmud-inspired ideology known as Zionism, have a totally different agenda in store for the nation.

Voters, who for the most part have been deceived by the pundits and the Zionist-controlled talking heads within their media, remain unaware of this insidious threat to our sovereignty. Were Canadians fully apprised of the seditious nature of the Zionist Jews within their nation’s walls they would likely vote en masse to rid the country of this omnipresent danger. But they aren’t and so the country once again teeters on the brink of the unknowing. Should the false saviour of Canada, Stephen Harper, achieve his mandate to rule over us with his Zionist rod then maybe that will be the time for a new movement to arise and a new federal party to germinate; one that will address the issues I’ve delineated in this essay plus all the others not covered. The key to our future as a sovereign nation is to understand how the Zionist agenda operates, not only in Canada but throughout the world. Without that key we will continue to remain prisoners of Zion.

Until May 2nd, 2011….

PLEASE NOTE: Arthur Topham is a writer and the Publisher and Editor of living in British Columbia, Canada. Like all alternative Internet news outlets not on the Zionist payroll he relies upon the good will and generosity of those in cyberspace for financial assistance to help him with his work. Any donations therefore would be most welcome. Please see the PayPal donation button at the top right of the home page. Feel free to use it if you can help out. 🙂 Thanks.

Arthur welcomes all feedback to his articles and can be reached at or via telephone at (250) 992-3479.

For the Full Monty on the sec. 13 complaint case involving and B’nai Brith Canada please see:

Letter to Editor: Harper blows billions of taxpayer’s money on G8 and G20 summits

Dear Editor,

Quite clearly the Government of Canada is tone deaf to the excess and waste in spending going on with the upcoming G8 and G20 summits.

Roughly a $1 billion is being spent on security alone, vastly more then  the 30 million spent for security at the London G20 summit and 18 million at Pittsburgh. There are of course additional millions being spent on all the other summit related costs and goodies for Tony Clement’s riding. The latest estimate is 1.2 billion and rising fast.

This is wildly inappropriate for a summit that purports to address the plight of impoverished women and children with an emphasis on maternal health.

This silly and disgusting excess and waste of money is going to put the lie to any idea that they care at all beyond the hoped for political payoffs.

Now, we are told, the latest bit of unnecessary and ridiculous spending is, at a cost of millions,  a  faux Muskoka deck and lake built for reporters along with a free Blackberry with promotional information about holidaying in cottage country.

Far from being thrilled with their loot bag  and the phony lake, all but the most venal will be disbelieving and disgusted.  How can our government with a straight face suggest we have to withdraw from spending money on aid to Africa and tighten our belts etc.

Do they think anyone will regard this out of control spending as a demonstration of our concern for the suffering of the world?

Even if it goes smoothly, this summit will be an embarrassment and a giant black eye to Canada. This is not a collection of Mike Duffy’s coming together, there will actually be people in attendance who give a damn about the topics up for discussion and will not be shy about giving their opinions.

If Harper thinks our press is hard on him, ,just wait till the rest of the world’s media get a gander at Steve and Tony’s billion dollar boondoggle especially when compared with the costs of the summits in other countries. *

Anne Dickinson
88 Somerset St. W.
Ottawa, Ontario
K2P 0H6
Tel. 613 234-2169

*Security costs at previous summits
G8 summit Japan, October 2008: $381 million
G8 summit Gleneagles, Scotland, July 2005: $110 million
G20 summit London, April 2009: $30 million
G20 summit Pittsburgh, September 2009: $18 million US

Agent Z: Big Mouth Singer or Just a Gaby Haas Wannabe? By Arthur Topham

Agent Z: Big Mouth Singer or Just a Gaby Haas Wannabe?
By Arthur Topham
October 5, 2009

“There is nothing that the International Jew fears so much as the truth, or any hint of the truth about himself or his plans.”
~Henry Ford Sr.,The International Jew, Vol. I, p. 200. originally published in The Dearborn Independent.

Back in the 70s when the kids were in their early years the grandparents used to buy them the latest plastic Fisher-Price toys. Their parents, being Hippies, weren’t into plastic so whenever they got something brand new from the grand-folks they usually took a shine to it. One toy in particular that I’ll always remember with fondness was a musical one that sang songs. It consisted of a number of variously-colored, bright plastic heads all lined up in a couple of rows like a chorus of singers and when you pushed the right button their mouths would all suddenly open in unison and a particular electronic sound/song would blare forth. I believe it’s brand name was “The Big Mouth Singers.”

Well, after reading some of Agent Z’s postings on, where he has taken up residency since July 22, 2009, I’m beginning to think that he and B’nai Brith Canada may possibly have been the prototype the creator of this delightful toy had in mind.

[Read more…]

Response to: The $100,000 anti-Jewish teenage graffiti hate crusade. Or not by Laura Rosen Cohen


[Editor’s Note: The following letter to Ms. Cohen is in response to her article of May 19th, 2009 in the National Post. (Please see bottom of this page for the url and the story.)

It’s a good start both for her and for the Zionist-controlled National Post. While there’s no good reason to be hopeful that either of them are serious about initiating any form of open debate on either Zionism or the domestic and foreign policies of the state of Israel, Ms. Cohen’s critique of the Canadian Jewish Congress and B’nai Brith Canada does cut to the quick and on the surface at least exposes the growing dichotomy that appears to exist between these pro-Zionist lobbyists and the remainder of Canada’s Jewish population. For whatever reasons Jews like Ms. Cohen are speaking out finally and stating their dissatisfaction with the manner in which these pressure groups attempt to speak for all Jews while at the same time they use their inordinate and powerful influence to censor the rest of Canadians whose views they deem inimical to their own interests.

Ms. Cohen’s revelations regarding the Harper government’s blatant patronage toward orgs like the CJC are also quite revealing, especially I would imagine, for the majority of grassroots Conservative supporters who voted unanimously back in 2008 to rid this country of Section 13(1) of the CHR Act and strip the CHR Commission of its powers to censor free speech and the Internet.]


May 21, 2009


Dear Ms. Cohen,

I’m sure that by now you are sufficiently swamped with a backlog of responses to your challenging and impenitent critique of Canada’s foremost players in the censorship game but nonetheless I must add my comments as well.

As one non-Jewish Canadian who is being directly impacted by B’nai Brith Canada due to a Sec. 13(1) complaint launched against myself and my website by this foreign lobbyist group, see CHRC Complaint Against from Harvey Smarba and B’nai Brith Canada, November 20, 2007, I can honestly say that your concerns about their methods of addressing issues of “hate” and “anti-Semitism,” etc. are both welcome and sorely needed.

For the most part I can only concur with your assessment of CJC and BBC although I would call you on one point in your article where you tend to tow the same party line as these Zionist lobbyists, that being your misunderstanding of Hamas.

Why Laura, given your purported awareness of current affairs, would you use the term “stealth normalization” to describe what very simply and honestly should be called the “open recognition” of the fact that Hamas is/was the democratically and duly elected government of the Palestinian people of Gaza?

Seeing as how internationally it is an historically recognized fact; one unfortunately which the governments of Israel, the USA, (and, deplorably) Canada have failed to come to terms with for blatant political reasons and have thus deigned to foster the erroneous deception that somehow Hamas is either of the two misconceptions which you have suggested in your article, I would think that you would acknowledge this reality and not add to the misconceptions already introduced into Canadian jurisprudence by the very forces you are attempting to correct in your fine article.

With respect though Laura to your comment about the CJC’s windfall donation from Canadian taxpayers of a hundred grand to use for increased security, given the almost identical physical surroundings which one will find upon attempting to breach the ramparts of the offices of the Canadian Human Rights Commission or the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal in Ottawa, one can easily extrapolate from such practises that both these quasi-judicial organizations are of the very same mindset which permeates that of the CJC and B’nai Brith Canada.

What that indicates to me, as a person now struggling full time with this “hate crimes” dragon of deception, is that these “undemocratically elected advocacy organizations” which you so aptly identify, have infiltrated Canada’s highest levels of government bureaucracy and are having an extremely negative effect upon the nation’s fundamental laws, affecting both our domestic and our foreign policies, which are bringing not only Canadian Jews but Canada itself into international disrepute and ignominy.

Since I am now embroiled in a “hate crimes” complaint involving Harvey Smarba and Anita Bromberg of the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada I have spent time teleconferencing with these people over the past couple of months in an attempt by the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal to establish the groundwork needed to proceed with a Tribunal “Hearing” concerning charges that I and my website have been spreading “hatred toward Jews and/or citizens of Israel.”

All of this waste of government/taxpayer money, plus the direct threats made toward my person by these sycophantic governmental HRCs for gross sums of money to compensate these groups for their supposed “hurt feelings,” is due to what you’ve highlighted here about Jewish lobbyists such as B’nai Brith Canada and the CJC failing to get a grip on present-day realities and relinquishing their outmoded, draconian, “embarrassing, failed policies,” and returning to what you call “the Jewish tradition of spirited debate.”

In this regard I would be most interested in knowing just how many thousands of dollars Mr. Harper has given to this pro-Zionist, pro-Israeli group so that it can carry on harassing and subjecting honest, free speech advocates such as myself, to the infamous, illegal repercussions of Section 13(1) of the Canadian Human Rights Act. Rather than additional physical defenses Mr. Harper’s generous donation to this beleaguered foreign lobby group (assuming they had their fingers in the pie) will likely go toward offsetting Anita Bromberg’s legal costs to her B’nai Brith lawyer Mr. Marvin Kurz who is leading the charge to destroy not only my reputation but also my livelihood and that of my family as well.

Your final plea to these two foreign lobbyists for some type of sanity and reason is laudable and most likely appreciated by many gent(i)le Canadians who perceive these two groups in precisely the same manner in which you do.

While you’ve failed to share with your readers exactly what the real “true threats facing Jews” are (which I would hope you will do in a subsequent article) you’ve definitely pinpointed the fundamental problem now plaguing not only the non-Jewish majority of Canadians i.e. Canada’s “hate crimes” legislation embedded in Section 13(1) of the CHR Act, but also the Jewish community as a whole who don’t buy into these “bullish” attempts to censor Canadians who choose to express their contrary political opinions on issues directly related to Jews and/or Israel.

Until this specious legislation is removed from Canada’s law books we’ll be forced to constantly deal with what I would call Canada’s “persecuted majority,” that is any non-Jewish Canadian who voices criticism of Israeli policies and/or the ideological framework upon which the state of Israel rests. Here, I would humbly suggest, is the root of any future problems which might face the Jewish community at large. When only Jews can voice their opinions and everyone else is punished with “hate crimes” legislation that doesn’t bode well for a harmonious relationship between the two cultures.

If you are interested further in this case please see the following url for a complete port folio of articles related to it: .

And thank you for your efforts at helping to assist in the process of peaceful resolution of this problem by identifying one of the major problems besetting Canada.

Shine your Light for Love & Peace & Justice for All,

Arthur Topham
The Radical Press
Canada’s Radical News Network
“Digging to the root of the issues since 1998”

The $100,000 anti-Jewish teenage graffiti hate crusade. Or not

By Laura Rosen Cohen
National Post, Full Comment

May 19, 2009

The ‘organized’ Jewish community of Canada, in two separate incidents, has once again demonstrated it has little understanding of average Canadians. In the past week, its two leading, undemocratically elected advocacy organizations have demonstrated yet again an appalling zeal for censorship and a familiar, and emasculated response to issues with real public policy implications for both Jews and non-Jews in Canada alike.

Last week, according to a story in the Jewish Tribune, the parents of a Grade 6 student in Richmond, B.C. complained about a lesson plan that included a current events article that portrayed Hamas as a “militant Islamic group,” rather than a terrorist organization, as defined by the Canadian government. A news story from Richmond quotes a representative of the Canadian Jewish Congress as saying “it is risky trying to teach 11-year-old kids about Middle East politics because it is so complex and polarized.” He agrees with teaching children about current events, but says “don’t start with the most complex.” And that is the beginning and end of the CJC’s involvement in the issue.

In other words, the stealth normalization of Hamas within the public school curriculum in British Columbia is problematic just because it’s ‘complex’. What is so complex and nuanced about Hamas? Surely, there is room for more discussion or advocacy on this issue.

The same week, the CJC did have time to perpetrate the myth that the Jews of Canada are a community at risk from the now thoroughly debunked “hate crimes”. The federal government just allocated $1 million to fight “hate crimes”, and amazingly, the Canadian Jewish Congress used its $100,000 share for more security at — wait for it — the Canadian Jewish Congress headquarters. Canadian Jews must be very relieved to know that potential haters must pass three levels of security before getting to CEO Bernie Farber’s office. My children’s Jewish day schools have no such luck.

B’nai B’rith fared just as dismally, with its call for a banning of the wretched piece of theatre known as Seven Jewish Children.

In their call for the banning of the play, Anita Bromberg, B’nai B’rith’s director of legal affairs said: “It’s not necessarily up to us to demand that such things never see the light of day … but there has to be some understanding and some appreciation of the complexity of the issues”. Excuse me? That’s exactly what you are demanding, and there is that ‘complexity’ thing again.

Coincidentally this week, and apparently unbeknownst to the Canadian Jewish Congress and B’nai B’rith, a Statistic Canada release showed that police services in Canada reported 785 crimes that were motivated by hate in 2007, down from 892 in 2006. That’s an awfully small amount of “hate” in a country as large as Canada. Moreover, most of the “hate crimes” were teenaged graffiti and involved no physical violence. How much funding is required to fend off such “hate”? How many levels of Jewish bureaucracy are needed to save Canadian Jews from hateful teenage graffiti? The reality is that the number of “hate crimes” in Canada cannot possibly justify a 24-hour anti-Semitism hotline. Perhaps B’nai B’rith should switch to pay as you go?

If anyone in Toronto, or anywhere else in the world wants to go to the theatre and subject themselves to skin-crawling, Jew-hating, anti-Israel tripe and listen to 10 minutes or five hours of how Jews are the new, real, true Nazis let them do so. It’s their choice — and their right to do so.

Of course it’s ‘hateful’ stuff. It’s downright nauseating garbage. But if the B’nai B’rith doesn’t like it, they should do it better. Why not counter ‘hate speech’ with better speech, more persuasive speech, or more compelling speech? Why not sponsor a play-writing or songwriting contest on Israel and send the winner to Israel for an all-expenses paid trip?

In April, when a bunch of rag-tag lefty activists tried to get the LCBO to stop buying Israel “apartheid” wines, all it took was a few e-mails for Toronto Jews to organize themselves and, along with their non-Jewish friends, purchase the entire stock of Israeli wines from GTA liquor stores. We beat them at their own game.

Jewish free speech advocates such as myself and Ezra Levant are constantly maligned for questioning the liberal, leftist orthodoxy of the organized community. But perhaps it is the time for a gentle retreat from embarrassing, failed policies, and a return the Jewish tradition of spirited debate. Whatever happened to ‘two Jews, three opinions’, and ‘three Jews, four synagogues’?

The organized Jewish community needs to recognize the true threats facing Jews (not Internet Nazis) and give voice to more conservative political voices. This Canadian Jew is begging you to stop being bullish on censorship and give up the ‘persecuted minority’ shtick.

National Post

Laura Rosen Cohen is a Toronto freelance writer