Canadian Judicial System

Are Canadians Really That Stupid? by Arthur Topham

April 24, 2013 by admin 3 Comments

by
Arthur Topham
April 24, 2013

I think about this often – the fact that the vast majority of Canadians can’t seem to figure out that their legal system is still grafted on to that of a foreign nation, i.e. Great Britain.

Given the fact that I’m facing the prospect of having to defend myself against spurious, malicious lies given to Canada’s RCMP “Hate Crime Unit” headed by Cst. Terry Wilson from the Surrey, B.C. precinct by two of the most chronic and overly zealous Zionist zealots who have ever slithered about upon Canadian soil (Harry Abrams and Richard Warman) – fabricated falsehoods that have morphed into criminal charges of a nature that could result in my having to spend two years in a federal penitentiary, I have good reason to contemplate the nature of how Britain is mixed up in this sordid conspiracy.

Now I can understand quite easily that any Canadian citizen who feels they are being unjustly treated should have the right to go to the authorities and state their concerns. This seems to me to be both a wise and fair right in any democratic nation and the only sensible alternative to prevent a citizen from having to take the law into their own hands for their protection and safety.

Even in the case of these two reprehensible, low-life, malevolent troglodytes I have no beef with their right to seek redress for their imagined persecution and hurt feelings. But what I do object to though, in the most fervent and strenuous manner possible, is the fact that I am being forced to argue my case and defend my rights in a supposed Canadian court of law where the pathetic plaintiff’s in this charade are able to have the queen of a foreign country act on their behalf and attempt to prosecute and find me guilty of supposed “hate crimes” against people of the Jewish faith as well as citizens of yet another foreign country, to wit, Israel.

Of course I am referring here to what in Canadian legal jurisprudence is referred to as the “Crown”. In Black’s Law Dictionary the term “Crown” is referred to as “the sovereign power in a monarchy, especially in relation to the punishment of crimes.” To be even more specific the “Crown” is the representative in England of the Rothschild banking cartel that owns and controls the independent state known as the “City of London” and whose public representative is Regina or what Canadians think of as the “Queen of England”.

Now in jolly ol’ England where they have had kings and queens for thousands of years one can easily imagine that their legal system would have the right to use that term and to employ it in any manner they so desire.

There is also a Latin term used in English law which is “Regina” and according to Black’s Law Dictionary it means, simply, “the queen”. Again, fine and dandy for all those who live in Great Britain and wish to be ruled under such conditions.

But I don’t live in England. I live in what is purported to be the sovereign country known as Canada. As I understand it I also live in an independent nation that has its own Constitution and Charter of Rights and Freedoms. So the obvious question that arises when I look at the legal documents which are before me is: why am I being prosecuted by “Regina” the queen of England and why is the “Crown” involved in my case?

Why, instead, is not the Canadian Legal System taking me task for alleged breaches of the Canadian Criminal Code instead of the queen of a foreign nation? In fact, how can it even be a legal possibility that “Regina” is against me and bringing forth an action against my person on behalf of two Canadian troglodytes when “Regina” is not even a Canadian citizen nor a bona fide representative of Canada?

Are Canadians really that stupid and dumbed down to the point where this glaring contradiction doesn’t register upon their critical thinking abilities?

If, in fact, we are indeed an independent and sovereign nation then why are we still using such legal terminology in our judicial processes? Why do we act as if we are independent and yet still keep using “the queen” and the “Crown” to represent what ought to be the highest and most legally authoritative designations within Canada’s legal institutions? It’s incorrect. It’s wrong; both legally and morally, and it begs the ultimate question as to the absolute legality and authority of all that purports to be Canada’s legitimate constitutional right to exist!

For Canadians to merely shrug (as Canadians are wont to do) and attempt to dismiss this crucial point as mere linguistics or sophistry on my part is not acceptable. The actual and true legitimacy of Canada as a sovereign and independent nation among other nations of the world depends upon our recognition within our legal system of the FACT of our sovereignty and that FACT must be reflected in the stated reality that Canada’s courts are being represented by Judges and lawyers who are beholding only to Canada and its Constitution.

As the justice system now exists it clearly points to a condition wherein Canada does not actually have a true and independent existence nor does it have a legitimate constitution, i.e., one that has been certified and sanctified by a vote of the whole population of the nation via a plebiscite. If it did we would not still be represented in our independent courts by “Regina” and the “Crown” but by Canada and its appointed representatives.

Is it really that difficult to comprehend or are Canadians just too stupid to see the contradiction?

—

Filed Under: Abrams/BBC v. Arthur Topham & RadicalPress.com, Arthur Topham - Editor & Publisher, B'nai Brith Canada, BC HATE CRIME TEAM, Canada, Canadian Charter of Rights & Freedoms, Canadian Human Rights Act, Canadian Human Rights Commission, Canadian Human Rights Tribunal, Canadian Identity/Sovereignty, Canadian Judicial System, Canadian Politics, Canadians, Charter of Rights and Freedoms, City of London, Cst Normandie Levas BC HATE CRIME TEAM, Det-Cst Terry Wilson BC HATE CRIME TEAM, Editor's Zone, Harry Abrams, Queen of England, Richard Warman, Rothschild Banking syndicate, Rothschild Zionist Criminal Cartel, Royal Canadian Mounted Police, The Radical Press

Paul Fromm on the Demise of Free Speech in Canada by Prof. Kevin MacDonald

April 18, 2013 by admin Leave a Comment

http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2013/04/paul-fromm-on-the-demise-of-free-speech-in-canada/
Paul Fromm on the Demise of Free Speech in Canada

By Kevin MacDonald
April 13, 2013

Paul Fromm, a pro-White activist who writes for his CAFE (Canadian Association for Free Expression) website, has an article on a recent ruling by the Canadian Supreme Court that once again indicates the power of the cultural left at the highest reaches of Western societies “The Whatcott Decision – A Grim Day for Christians and Freedom of Speech“). The case involves a $15000 fine (plus court costs likely to be north of $150,000) imposed on an evangelical Christian who distributed leaflets containing criticism of homosexuality based on Biblical teachings.

Some excerpts and comments:

The decision is pure cultural Marxism. It reflects the triumph of *Frankfurt School* social science which has captured most Western universities. While economic communism collapsed and was defeated, cultural communism was spread by the *Frankfurt School*. Basically, it sees the world divided up into two classes: oppressors – those would be White Christians, and especially sexually healthy White males – and the oppressed – those would be women, homosexuals, Jews, and certain other racial minorities. To overthrow the “oppressors” and to establish universal equality – not of opportunity but results – the *Frankfurt School* targeted loyalty to family, country and religion. There began a concerted campaign of “deconstruction” whereby political heroes, cultural heroes – the dismissal of traditional English literature as the writing of dead, White males – and traditional Christianity were mocked and attacked. These ideas have captured the upper echelons of Canada’s judiciary and bode poorly for freedom of speech.

The Whatcott decision holds that in human rights cases:

· Truth is no defence;?

· Intent is no defence;?

· No harm needs to be proven to have been caused to a “vulnerable” minority;

· A minority is designated as “vulnerable” not because of any evidence – the court admits concrete evidence is often lacking, but on the mere say-so of a human rights commission or court;

· Christians are not protected from hatred as they are not a “vulnerable minority.”

The Court depicts Mr. Whatcott as having the power to intimidate homosexuals. The reality is far different:

Well, where’s the evidence that in the decade since Mr. Whatcott handed out his flyers critical of homosexuals, that “dialogue” was shut down and homosexuals were unable to respond? For nearly 20 years, the powerful homosexual lobby has been pushing for same sex marriage – a revolutionary anti-family retreat from tradition. In 2001, Parliament overwhelmingly voted to endorse the traditional definition of marriage – one man and one woman. The lobby continued its pressure, apparently not intimidated or silenced by the lonely Mr. Whatcott’s leafleting. A cowardly Jean Chretien referred the “question” as to whether the traditional definition of marriage, accepted by almost all but the fringiest elements of Christianity, and by Judaism, Islam, and Hinduism, was “discriminatory” to the judicial revolutionaries on the Supreme Court. They collapsed and gave the homosexual lobby what it wanted. Canada has same-sex marriage.

Despite being a Catholic, Liberal Premier Dalton McGuinty of Ontario forced even Catholic schools to promote the homosexual agenda in the schools and have Gay-Straight Alliance Clubs, even though the practice of homosexuality violates Catholic teaching. (So much for religious freedom!) The homosexual agenda has triumphed in almost every battle. It successfully pressured to have “sexual orientation” added to the privileged groups protected by Sec. 319 of the Criminal Code, Canada’s notorious “hate law.” In fact, there’s no evidence that Mr. Whatcott’s pathetic little leafleting operation ever intimidated any homosexual from promoting his cause. The only one excluded from the debate is Mr. Whatcott! Mr. Whatcott and strong critics of the homosexual agenda are all but excluded from the mainstream media. Pro-homosexual commentators bray their views from the CBC and the Globe and Mail is virtually a mouthpiece for the homosexual lobby. The only voices marginalized are critics of the homosexual agenda.

Fromm targets the Frankfurt School, a Jewish intellectual movement discussed in Chapter 5 of The Culture of Critique:

Despite calling themselves a “School of Social research,” the Frankfurt School feared any objective research that might challenge their ideology. Like the Supreme Court, they defined the world ideologically, and facts would not be allowed to get in the way:

The Frankfurt School never set out to find out the truth about human behavior and institutions. Instead, its members viewed empirically oriented social science as an aspect of domination and oppression. Horkheimer wrote in 1937 that “if science as a whole follows the lead of empiricism and the intellect renounces its insistent and confident probing of the tangled brush of observations in order to unearth more about the world than even our well-meaning daily press, it will be participating passively in the maintenance of universal injustice.” Rather than find out how society works, the social scientist must be a critic of culture and adopt an attitude of resistance toward contemporary societies.

The unscientific nature of the enterprise can also be seen in its handling of dissent within the ranks of the Institute—a trend that is a common feature of Jewish intellectual and political movements Erich Fromm was excised from the movement in the 1930s because his leftist humanism opposed the authoritarian nature of the psychoanalyst-patient relationship. This was not compatible with the pro-Bolshevik stance championed at the time by the Horkheimer-Adorno line: Fromm “takes the easy way out with the concept of authority,without which, after all, neither Lenin’s avant-garde nor dictatorship can be conceived of. I would strongly advise him to read Lenin…I must tell you that I see a real threat in this article to the line which the journal takes. (See Chapter 5 of The Culture of Critique.)

One of the most shocking revolutionary conclusions of the Court is that truth should not be a defence, at least in human rights cases: “The lack of defences is not fatal to the constitutionality of the provision. Truthful statements can be presented in a manner that would meet the definition of hate speech, and not all truthful statements must be free from restriction. …

Fromm emphasizes the Jewish role in this decision:

Finally, and this is a delicate topic in oppressive, minority-ruled Canada, let’s look at the makeup of the six judge panel who heard this crucial case about the rights of Christians. Three, yes three, or fully one half of the panel were Jews. Under the regime of employment equity, a Canadian version of anti-White “affirmative action”, invented by, guess who? Madame Justice Rosalie Silberman Abella, who was on the panel, “systemic discrimination” is evidenced by an over-representation or under-representation of a group. It must be remembered that Jews, at about 310,000, constitute less than one per cent of Canada’s population, but made up half of panel in Whatcott! Did their personal views interfere? Ironically, had Justice Abella applied her own “employment equity” she’d have removed herself from the panel in Whatcott as her minority was already heftily over-represented.

The author of this freedom trashing opinion was Mr. Justice Marshall Rothstein of Manitoba. His biography on the Supreme Court website notes: “He served as an adjudicator under the Manitoba Human Rights Act from 1978 to 1983 and as a member of the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal from 1986 to 1992.” In other words, he was, for more than a decade, part of the whole repressive “human rights” industry he was now being invited to critique. In his case, there was more than a “reasonable apprehension of bias.” Perhaps, no surprise he found state censorship and strong criticism of privileged minorities perfectly justified in a “free” [do words mean nothing!] and “democratic society.”

At least two Liberal senators, Robina Jaffer and Jim Munson (a former journalist happily at ease with state censorship), in speaking against Bill C-304, which would repeal Sec. 13 (Internet censorship) of the Canadian Human Rights Act quoted Justice Abella and her emphasis on“vulnerable minorities”: to wit: “In a 2009 speech entitled Human Rights and History’s Judgment, Justice Rosalie Abella said: We were supposed to have learned three indelible lessons from the concentration camps of Europe. First, indifference is injustice’s incubator. Second, it’s not just what you stand for, it’s is what you stand up for. And third, we must never forget how the world looks to those who are vulnerable.’” Justice Abella was also part of the human rights industry having served on the Ontario Human Rights Commission. Her biography on the Supreme Court website notes: “She married Canadian historian Irving M. Abella on December 8, 1968.” Irving Abella is a past president of the Canadian Jewish Congress, a pro-censorship intervener in Whatcott. The CJC has been a long-time and strident supporter of anti-free speech “hate laws”. Again, one might wonder why Justice Abella did not recuse herself from this case is there is more than a “reasonable apprehension of bias.”

It is certainly true that the organized Jewish community has been a strong voice supporting laws curtailing free speech, not just in Canada, but throughout the Western world (see “The Hate Crimes Prevention Bill: Why Do Jewish Organizations Support It?“). Irving Abella’s book was cited in my chapter on the Jewish role in promoting immigration. Although the chapter emphasizes the Jewish role in altering U.S. immigration policy in favor of non-Whites, the Jewish community played a similar role throughout the West, including Canada:

In the case of Canada, Abella (A Coat of Many Colors: Two Centuries of Jewish Life in Canada; 1990, 234–235) notes the important contribution of Jews in bringing about a multicultural Canada and, in particular, in lobbying for more liberal immigration policies. Reflecting this attitude, Arthur Roebuck, attorney general of Ontario, was greeted “with thunderous applause” at a 1935 convention for the Zionist Organization of Canada [dedicated to a Jewish ethnostate] when he stated that he looked “forward to the time when our economic conditions will be less severe than they are today and when we may open wide the gates, throw down the restrictions and make of Canada a Mecca for all the oppressed peoples of the world” (in M. Brown 1987, 256).

Abella also co-authored a book, None Is Too Many that was critical of Canada for not admitting Jewish refugees in the World War II era. The title comes from a statement of a senior Canadian immigration official that summed up Canadian policy.

Thus we have Jewish activists involved in academic research on Jewish issues. And perhaps more importantly, Jewish activists are involved in court decisions that reflect consensus views within the Jewish community on issues related to free speech, multiculturalism, and immigration. The hostile elite in action.

—–

Filed Under: "hate speech", "Jewish" holocaust, Abrams/BBC v. Arthur Topham & RadicalPress.com, Anti-Defamation League (ADL), B'nai Brith Canada, BC HATE CRIME TEAM, Bill C-304, Bill Whatcott, C.B.C./Canadian Broadcasting Corp., CAFE - Canadian Association for Free Expression, Canada's Queer Community, Canadian Catholic News, Canadian Charter of Rights & Freedoms, Canadian Council for Israel and Jewish Advocacy (CIJA), Canadian Human Rights Act, Canadian Human Rights Commission, Canadian Human Rights Tribunal, Canadian Jewish Congress, Canadian Jewish Lobby, Canadian Judicial System, Catholic Activists, Catholic Insight magazine, Chabad Lubavich Cult, Conservative Party of Canada, Editor's Zone, Free Speech on the Internet, Freedom of Speech, Globe and Mail, Harry Abrams, Hate Crime laws, Hate laws, Jewish Censorship, Jewish Crime, Jewish Freemasons, Jewish Hatred, Jewish Holocaust Industry, Jewish Lobby Groups, Jewish Media Monopoly, Jewish Racism, Jews, Justice Marshall Rothstein SCC, Kevin MacDonald, League for Human Rights of B'nai Brith Canada, Madame Justice Rosalie Silberman Abella, Marxism, Marxist Frankfurt School, Paul Fromm (CAFE), PM Stephen Harper, Political Zionism, Roman Catholics, Sec. 13(1) CHRA, Sec. 319(2) CC "Willful Promotion of Hatred", The Controversy of Zion, The Holy Bible, The Occidental Observer, The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, Ukrainian Holocaust

The Tyee: Zionist Collaborator and Hate-monger promotes Fear and Smear campaign against Doug Christie

March 13, 2013 by admin Leave a Comment

[Editor's Note: I was alerted to this vicious smear of Doug Christie, penned by Tyee contributor Tom Hawthorn, by a good friend and associate only this morning.

In their email regarding the Tyee's hate-filled screed against Doug the writer said, "I am SO TICKED off at the slanderous article in the FUCKING TYEE I could spit right now. OH I am so FURIOUS at the Tyee for printing this crap! It is like the author waited for just the right time to loose his venom.... and his readers all agree. DEAR GOD ARTHUR! sick fucks... pardon me ..."

Sick fucks indeed! Yet does it come as a surprise to me? No, not at all.

I've been monitoring the Tyee since its inception and have been fully cognizant of its editorial position with respect to the machinations of the Jews and their deadly, nefarious ideology known as Zionism. They are but another of the "left", "liberal", "progressive", "yuppie", "pseudo-alternative", "mainstream", "anti-racist", "marxist" media outlets that wouldn't say "shit" about the actions of the Jews even if their mouth was full of it (which it is).

By their actions here in posting this vile, hate-filled diatribe against a man who has given his life to fighting against the very forces that these bigoted bastards now have shown themselves to be a part of, it is but another fine example of how Lady Justice always tends to out those who would deceive the general public, sooner or later. Now we know for sure the true intent and focus of "The Tyee" and who they owe their allegiance to.

As my friend pointed out in their email, even the comments (for the most part) by Tyee readers to the malicious and callous denigrating of the recently dead Mr. Christie tended to reflect the type of online community of Zionist sycophants that congregate around its malignant and odious effusions of hate and calumny. The Tyee, in granting this Zionist grunt their headline space to further the lies of the Jews with respect to the righteous and honorable actions of Douglas Christie, has shown its true colours and they just happen to be blue and white, the same as the flag of the state of Israel.

As previously stated I've always known there was something fishy smelling about this online blog and one can only hope that after three or more days of exposing this article to the sunshine of truth that the whole of the Tyee's reputation for being a disseminator of truth and freedom will stink to high heaven and online readers will approach it with a firm grasp of their nose and the caution it clearly deserves.]

—–

I refuse to adorn my site with this pathetic zio bullshit hit piece and would ask of readers to go to the url provided if they wish to get a good whiff of what truth seekers and lovers of freedom of speech are truly up against.

http://thetyee.ca/Life/2013/03/13/The-Unauthorized-Obituary-of-Doug-Christie/

Filed Under: B'nai Brith Canada, B'nai Brith International, BC HATE CRIME TEAM, BC Justice Minister Shirley Bond, Canadian Association for Freedom of Speech (CAFE), Canadian Charter of Rights & Freedoms, Canadian Council for Israel and Jewish Advocacy (CIJA), Canadian Free Speech League, Canadian Human Rights Act, Canadian Human Rights Commission, Canadian Human Rights Tribunal, Canadian Identity/Sovereignty, Canadian Jewish Congress, Canadian Jewish Lobby, Canadian Judicial System, Charter of Rights & Freedoms, Doug Christie, Douglas H. Christie, Ernst Zundel, Free Speech, Free Speech on the Internet, Freedom of Expression, Freedom of Speech, Freedom of Thought, Jewish Censorship, Jewish Hatred, Jewish Holocaust Lie, Jewish Lobby Groups, Jewish Media Monopoly, Jewish Porn Industry, Jewish Racism, Jewish Ritual Murder, Jewish Supremacism, Jewish Terrorists, Jews, Jews Behind Bolshevik Revolution, Jim Keegsra, Political Zionism, The Tyee, Zionism, Zionist Atrocities, Zionist National Post

CANADIAN OUTLAWS: Truth, Christians and Free Speech fall prey to Zionist misfeasance by Arthur Topham

March 6, 2013 by admin 4 Comments

CANADIAN OUTLAWS: Truth, Christians and Charter of Rights fall prey to Zionist misfeasance

By Arthur Topham

March 3, 2013

The recent, decision handed down on Wednesday, February 27, 2013 by six of Canada’s Supreme Court justices, in the Saskatchewan (Human Rights Commission) v Whatcott case, was indeed a ‘supreme’ blow to Christians, to freedom of religion and to every individual’s right to freedom of speech in Canada. At the same time, it also was a remarkably clandestine victory for the foreign Zionist-Jew lobby groups such as B’nai Brith Canada, the Canadian Jewish Congress, and the Canadian Council for Israel and Jewish Advocacy (CIJA); all of whom reflect, represent and condone, in unabashed fashion, the principles and policies of the Zionist state of Israel, over and above the traditional rule of law that has been the hallmark of Canadian jurisprudence from its earliest beginnings.

On top of this victorious legal coup that the vast majority of Canadians remain either ignorant of or in denial of, there are the added collaborating players in this long-range agenda to subvert and mould Canada’s judiciary into a type more in keeping with that of the U.S.A’s; one which, in recent years, has become permeated by their Jewish lobby groups to such an extent that they’ve effectively emasculated the US legal system by introducing their own brand of Jewish Noahide laws into American jurisprudence. These Noahide laws are, in fact, ones that stem from the ancient writings of the Jewish Talmud; a horrendously hoary and convoluted compilation of endless sophistry and intellectual meanderings that attempt to cover the full gamut of possible mental masterbation on any conceivable topic capable of debate, all of which boggles the mind and taxes the heart and soul of anyone who is able to locate and delve into the bottomless pit of arcane, abstruse, macabre deliberations found therein.

It is my contention, based upon all recent research and extrapolation, that this same clandestine, Fifth Column Zionist-instigated seditious process is, and has been, occurring here in Canada since the inception of our nation’s “hate speech laws” that, coincidentally, began to gain ascendency in Canada’s house of justice back in the late 1960′s when the major Jewish lobby groups first began to amalgamate and initiate this calculated, step by step, surreptitious program of incremental changes to Canada’s legal system; one that would eventually see the switch over from former Christian democratic principles of freedom of speech to those of the Talmudic Jewish Noahide laws under which Jewry has operated over the past two millennia. It is also my added contention that these subtle changes have been, and are being, spearheaded by those very justices of the Supreme Court of Canada who hold duel citizenship with the state of Israel and whose ultimate allegiance, I strongly allege, is first and foremost to that foreign nation.

Compounding and exacerbating this traitorous intent to corrupt and debase Canada’s legal system via “hate crime legislation” is the growing realization by many Canadians that our so-called “independent” media is, in fact, totally controlled, editorially and otherwise, by this same self-serving Zionist Jew consortium and that these media monopolists, along with their line of sycophantic, sayanim journalists and talking heads, are the major propaganda force behind this plot to subvert the Canadian justice system.

Most Canadians who have not been asleep at the wheel politically are now fully cognizant of the fact that the Harper Conservative government is the key to the success of these Zionist “hate crime” operatives and their eventual triumph in binding the mouths and minds of Canadians so that any and all criticism of their planned take-over of the country will not be openly discussed, either in the print media, television or on the Internet. Their arsenal of epithets stands ready 24/7 to support any smear & fear campaign necessary to belittle and slander and denigrate those who show any indication of not bowing down in obeisance to their treasonous scheme to dismantle and re-create our former legal system so as to have it fit harmoniously with all the other nations that have also been infiltrated by these same self-chosen zealots.

The whole of the homosexual agenda is but one of the ruses that these lobbyists use in order to divide, confuse and conquer their opponents and justify, via their human rights commissions, tribunals and their Supreme Court double-agents, the introduction of more and more repressive anti-democratic “hate speech” laws. These tactics, for those who have studied the Zionist’s modus operandi to any degree, are par for the course. The crucial thing for them is to use others rather than come straight out and say we’re bringing in all these repressive, Orwellian laws because we don’t want Canadians discussing and debating our ideology, our motives or our agenda; one that includes enslaving and punishing anyone who steps out of line and beyond that the total destruction of the Christian religion as we now know it.

There is, on top of all these seemingly inexplicable occurrences, a vital question that needs to asked and addressed with respect to the inordinate number of Zionist, duel-citizenship Jewish justices who have somehow wended their way upwards to the apex of Canada’s judicial system and are now literally in positions of supreme power and control with respect to influencing both our Constitution and our Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

Given that Canada is noted world wide for being a proactive, multicultural nation; one that welcomes immigrants from around the world to its shores and touts itself as being an open, free and culturally diverse society, the blatant imbalance that we are witnessing today in the ethnic composition of our Supreme Court justices is beyond question a problem in dire need of explanation.

Were we, as a nation, to give equal opportunity and consideration to the various visible minorities that make up our country’s population then this ought to be reflected in the composition of those who sit in judgement at the top of our federal judicial system.

Knowing that our First Nations population is the largest minority group in Canada it behooves all Canadians to ask the obvious: why do we not have a First Nations justice sitting in on our supreme court? Given that this nation was formed, literally, from the soil of the original people’s land and also given that the First Nations people constitute the largest group in the Canadian population matrix does it not make sense that when it comes to representing their interests that someone from their ranks ought to be a member of this august group of supreme court justices?

Next in line is our Chinese-Canadian population topping the list as the largest visible minority in Canada and again the obvious question is: why do we not have a Chinese-Canadian justice sitting in the SCC?

Next in line we have a very large South Asian population followed by an equally large black population. Where are the South Asian and the Black supreme court justices?

Finally, getting to the crux of this perplexing situation, as we go down the scale of relative population demographics we come to the ethnic Jewish population in Canada which, according to the Jewish Virtual Library, in 2010 numbered 375,000 in population, ranking somewhere in the neighbourhood of 25th in terms of group size and comprising, out of a total population of 33,890,000 Canadians, 1.1% of Canada’s total population. Yet, for their relatively small numbers in terms of percentages they now hold 4 out of 9 positions on Canada’s Supreme Court. That works out to 44.4% of Canada’s supreme court justices somehow stemming from 1.1 % of the country’s total population. If common sense cannot tell people that there is a glaring discrepancy here then something surely is wrong in the way that Canadians view the make-up of their nation’s highest court. No amount of intellectual verbiage can explain why this is so without getting into the fundamental question of what the real reasons are for this most obvious of imbalances wherein we have a preponderance of duel-citizen Jewish justices sitting and deliberating the vital questions currently being discussed in this brief essay.

Of course the immediate reaction from the Zionist lobbies is to reach up their proverbial sleeve and pull out their “anti-Semitic” and “hate speech” cards and flash them across the nation via their controlled media in typical fashion whenever their power base is questioned or threatened. Then will follow their sophistry and rhetoric emanating from the academics and talking heads arguing that this blatant discrepancy is simply due to the fact that Jewish lawyers are the most intelligent, experienced and therefore qualified of all of Canada’s lawyers and, like the cream atop the cow’s milk, they naturally rise up to those positions of eminence and power.

As the kids would say, “Yah, sure.”

To conclude, it cannot be stressed or repeated enough that we either have free speech or we have controlled speech where Big Brother takes control of our conscience and our mind and leaves us as automatons and slaves to do their bidding and those who now sit in judgement over our collective rights , due to their recent actions in the Whatcott case, must be treated with the utmost suspicion and their motives fully analyzed.

The time to act on these concerns is yesterday. Tomorrow may be too late.

The SCC Puppets

I present below the figures of the three Ashkenazi Zionists who have, along with their controllers in Tel Aviv and elsewhere, and the other three Shabbez Goi justices, perpetrated this seditious act of attempting to twist the truth and our human right to freedom of speech into some form of kosher, Zionist fritter all the better to fragment and confuse the people of Canada so as to lure our nation further astray into the nightmare that awaits the world should Zionism ever gain full control over independent nation states.

It must also be adamantly born in mind as well that the fact that I am presenting and focusing on these three individuals is absolutely not to be misconstrued as having excused the other three protagonists in this deceptive legal drama. The primary purpose here is accent the Jewish lobby in Canad and its unsavory effect upon Canada’s legal system. It goes without saying that the other three justices have, for whatever reasons, also consented to this agenda and ought to be removed from their positions along with the three Zionist duel-citizen justices in question here.

With respect to Canada’s current Madam Chief Justice McLachlin it is also relevant and fitting that the following quote by Jason Moscovitz of the CBC be mentioned here as it is most relevant to an understanding of the mindset of these six judicial side-kicks when it comes to our right to freedom of speech. Jason Moscovitz states: “Of all the attributes she brings to the high court, there is one that sticks out. Many legal experts say she does not consider the Charter of Rights to be necessarily sacred.” [Jason Moscovitz CBC Date: 991103 Time: 22:00:00 ET - 22:26:00 ET]

While still in her twenties SCC Abella was appointed a member of the Human Rights Commission of Ontario. Her husband, Irving Abella, is the J. Richard Shiff Professor of Canadian Jewish Studies at York University in Toronto and a past president of the Canadian Jewish Congress, one of the leading “hate speech law” lobby groups in Canada.

SCC Justice Abella is on the International Board of the Hebrew University, a member of the United States Holocaust Museum’s Committee on Conscience (again, pushing the 6 million lies of the Zionists that have become since WWII one of the principal pillars supporting all of their criminal actions since that time).

The president (Canadian Section) of the International Commission of Jurists, cited her as one whose “entire life has revolved around the cause of human rights… She has shaped Canadian policy in equality rights, and…has also had a profound impact on human rights law and policy outside Canada.” The precise manner in HOW SCC has “shaped Canadian policy in equality rights” is now fairly apparent given her complicity in this recent and deplorable attack upon Canada’s unquestionable right to freedom of speech.

SCC Justice Abella also served as a commissioner on the Ontario Human Rights Commission. Again, those who have been complicit in the actions of the human “rights” commissions here in Canada have revealed their motives clearly enough over the past decade and longer and have lost credibility in the eyes of the rest of the 98% of Canada who do not want to have their rights tampered with to satisfy the spurious and fraudulent false front arguments of special minority groups.

True to his name there’s definitely something “fishy” about this lastest SCC decision.

SCC Justice Rothstein has served as an adjudicator under the Manitoba Human Rights Act from 1978 to 1983 and as a member of the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal from 1986 to 1992. He has also held many other offices or appointments connected to the Manitoba Human Rights Act and the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal.

So what have people like Marshall Rothstein learned from all of their involvement in harassing and vilifying and criminalizing Canadians for having exercised their God-given right to freedom of expression and speech? By all appearances he’s learned that the manipulation of the law,when it is being supported by a Fifth Column media and a host of complicit, compromised politicians under the sway of the Zionist lobby, is relatively easy to accomplish and virtually a fait accompli.

———

Filed Under: Abrams/BBC v. Arthur Topham & RadicalPress.com, B'nai Brith, B'nai Brith Canada, B'nai Brith International, Canada's Queer Community, Canadian "Just-Us" System, Canadian Association for Free Expression (CAFE), Canadian Catholic News, Canadian Charter of Rights & Freedoms, Canadian Constitution Foundation (CCF), Canadian Council for Israel and Jewish Advocacy, Canadian Council for Israel and Jewish Advocacy (CIJA), Canadian Federation of Chabad Lubavitch, Canadian Free Speech League, Canadian Human Rights Act, Canadian Human Rights Commission, Canadian Human Rights Tribunal, Canadian Identity/Sovereignty, Canadian Jewish Congress, Canadian Jewish Defense League, Canadian Jewish Lobby, Canadian Judicial System, Canadian Rights and Freedom Bulletin, Christianity, Christians, Editor's Zone, Freedom of Expression, Freedom of Speech, Freedom of Thought, Homosexuals, Political Zionism, Supreme Court of Canada, The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, The Radical Press

Mark Dankof’s America: Interview with Radical Press publisher Arthur Topham Wed. Feb. 27

February 27, 2013 by admin Leave a Comment

CLICK HERE

Filed Under: B'nai Brith Canada, B'nai Brith International, Campaign to Silence Arthur Topham, Canadian Charter of Rights & Freedoms, Canadian Free Speech League, Canadian Human Rights Act, Canadian Human Rights Commission, Canadian Human Rights Tribunal, Canadian Jewish Congress, Canadian Judicial System, Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Cst Normandie Levas BC HATE CRIME TEAM, Det-Cst Terry Wilson BC HATE CRIME TEAM, Harry Abrams, Interviews, League for Human Rights of B'nai Brith Canada, Mark Dankof, Political Zionism, RCMP Corruption, Richard Warman, Section 13/CHR Act, Section 319(2) CC, THE UGLY TRUTH

Radical Press Interview with Mark Glenn on The Ugly Truth BlogRadio Show

February 22, 2013 by admin Leave a Comment

Here is the Url to the show: http://blogtalk.vo.llnwd.net/o23/show/4/445/show_4445021.mp3

Dear Supporters of Freedom of Speech everywhere,

On Thursday, February 21st, 2012 I was privileged to be able to go on Mark Glenn’s BlogRadio show hosted by his site The Ugly Truth.

Mark is an excellent host and speaker and is extremely well versed in the Zionist issues of today and yesterday. As such his preliminary commentary on a number of issues that precedes my actual interview is well worth listening to.

The show lasted for an hour and forty-eight minutes so it will take some time to listen to but I highly recommend that you do.

The one thing that struck me most deeply as I listened to Mark speaking was the fact that in the United States the founding fathers had the forethought to insure that the people of that nation would take their freedoms seriously and therefore guaranteed that the foremost freedom, that of freedom of speech, would be enshrined in their Constitution. Were it so in Canada.

Here we are facing the pernicious machinations of the foreign state of Israel and its B’nai Brith lobbyists, compounded by the fact that these same inimical enemies of freedom also control our country’s media and have gained an extremely critical foothold both within the office of the Prime Minster of Canada Mr. Stephen Harper and within our judiciary. Their dangerous influence upon our government and our democratic institutions, exemplified by the self-created “hate crime” laws which they surreptitiously slipped into our legal system over time, stands as the most clear example of seditious actions aimed at undermining and subverting our government.

Hiding behind their mask of “mainstream” media propaganda they are in full attack mode and out to repress and control Canadian’s right to free expression and freedom of speech on the internet. Without our ability to talk freely about Israel and its sayanim, Fifth column organizations like B’nai Brith and its ideology of Zionism and to offer our perspectives and our criticisms on this most dangerous and diabolic political device ever known to humankind we are severely handicapped in our efforts to educate people as to its true design and motives and thus initiate measures to protect our own Constitutional rights and freedoms.

Thus the need for further and greater education on these matters. Please take the time to listen to this broadcast and remember that feedback to me is always welcome and necessary. I can be reached at radical@radicalpress.com .

Here is the Url to the show: http://blogtalk.vo.llnwd.net/o23/show/4/445/show_4445021.mp3

Filed Under: "hate speech", Abrams/B'nai Brith Canada v. Arthur Topham and RadicalP, America, Anti-Defamation League (ADL), Anti-terrorism Act, Arthur Topham, B'nai Brith Canada, BC HATE CRIME TEAM, Canadian Charter of Rights & Freedoms, Canadian Human Rights Act, Canadian Human Rights Commission, Canadian Human Rights Tribunal, Canadian Identity/Sovereignty, Canadian Judicial System, Conservative Party of Canada, Cst Normandie Levas BC HATE CRIME TEAM, Det-Cst Terry Wilson BC HATE CRIME TEAM, Editor's Zone, Free Speech on the Internet, Freedom of Speech, Gaza, Germany Must Perish!, Harry Abrams, Hasbara, Hate Crime laws, Hate laws, Israeli Terrorism, Israeli War Crimes, Jewish Censorship, Jewish Hatred, Jewish Lobby, Jewish Media Monopoly, Jewish power, Jewish Racism, Jewish Supremacism, Jews, League for Human Rights of B'nai Brith Canada, Mainstream Mindcontrol Media (M3), Mainstream News Media (msm), Marc Lemire, Mark Glenn, National Zionist Jew Post, New World Order, Palestine, PM Stephen Harper, Political Zionism, RCMP Corruption, Richard Warman, Rothschild Zionist Criminal Cartel, Royal Canadian Mounted Police, sayanim, Sec. 13(1) CHRA, Sec. 319(2) CC "Willful Promotion of Hatred", The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, The Radical Press, World Zionist Organization

Radical Press Legal Update #8

January 4, 2013 by admin 1 Comment

Dear Supporters of Freedom of Speech,

January 3, 2013 was a good day in B.C. and across the nation for those who have taken up metaphorical arms in defence of Canada’s fundamental right to freedom of speech on the Internet.

Here in B.C. and out in Ontario those battling against the forces of media censorship and repression were, in both cases, successful in their efforts and thus, for once, I have only positive news to report.

I should preface this update with a short apology to some readers who were sent an alert yesterday indicating that I had unexpectedly been called to court. That was an error on my part due to some confusion arising from the previous bail hearing that took place on December 19, 2012 wherein I got the date for my next appearance mixed up. Call it a senior moment if you will.

During the last court appearance in December presiding Judge Church, after hearing arguments from both the Crown and Defence regarding the Crown’s rather strident and persistent effort to reimpose the original bail conditions that were placed on me by Cst. Terry Wilson of the BC HATE CRIME TEAM back on May 16, 2012, reserved her judgement on the issue until January 3, 2013.

My lawyer Doug Christie attended by telephone from Victoria, B.C. and I and my wife were in the Quesnel Court room at 1:30 p.m. to hear Judge Church’s decision.

The Judge first gave an overview of the Crown’s arguments and those of Defence lawyer Mr. Christie before presenting her own position on the issue. According to Judge Church the Crown’s basic argument was that while I had legally resumed publishing on RadicalPress.com on November 2, 2012 I was still publishing material that the Crown felt was of the same calibre as that originally complained of by Harry Abrams and Richard Warman. To back up Crown’s argument Crown Council Jennifer Johnston had submitted to Judge Church on December 19, 2012 a couple of screen shots taken from the radicalpress.com website that had supposed controversial headings which CC Johnston felt were significant enough that they warranted reinstating the original draconian restrictions that Cst Terry Wilson had unilaterally saddled me with on the day of my arrest in May.

Having considered these apparently pithy examples of willful promotion of hatred against “people of the Jewish religion or ethnic group” Judge Church went on to say that while the screen shots may have (as Crown was alleging), indicated an “undertone” of hatred toward those of the Jewish faith, Crown had not gone so far as to state that the captured text was in fact hateful. Furthermore, Crown had not disclosed to Judge Church any additional corroborating information pertaining to the screen shots in question which Crown was alleging were displaying such sentiments and so, according to the Judge, she had no way of determining whether or not the screen shots or the accompanying articles were, in fact, contravening sec. 319(2) of the CC of Canada.

Judge Church then went on to review Defence council Doug Christie’s arguments which basically stated Crown was attempting to pre-judge the published materials before a trial was held to determine whether or not they were in truth a contravention of sec. 319(2). It was also established that I am, in fact, a publisher and that under Canada’s constitution I have the right to publish articles deemed to be of interest to the general public and until such time that said articles are proven in a court of law to have contravened Canada’s hate crime legislation that my right to publish should not be pre-emptively prohibited simply because of allegations of wrong doing by those who feel particular materials are wilfully promoting hatred toward an ethnic minority. Throughout the course of her comments the Judge referred to the cases cited by both Crown and Defence during the previous hearing on December 19, 2012.

Another issue that had come up on December 19, 2012 was that of Disclosure. The Crown had then argued that they were withholding disclosure from my attorney because of a breach of protocol that had occurred back in the summer when a confidential document released to Doug Christie was later found to have been posted on a third party website (FreeDominion.ca). The Judge went on to describe the event which had to do with what is called a “Warned Statement” which was a digitally recorded conversation between myself and the arresting officer Cst Terry Wilson on the day of my arrest. The Crown alleged that the breach (committed by me due to ignorance of the nature of the document) posed a serious threat to the safety of the two complainants in the case Warman and Abrams and for that reason Crown had filed a further application demanding that my lawyer not provide me with any further disclosure because I might intentionally publish it or give it to someone else who might publish it and in the process endanger the complainants. CC Johnston had cited the case of the Basi-Virk Trial involving the BC Rail/BC Liberal government scandal as reasoning for her allegations.

The Judge then went on to state that the case law cited by Crown in fact dealt with examples where secondary parties who were testifying may have been at risk but that in my case it was information which I personally had given to Cst. Terry Wilson and was, as my lawyer had stated, not of the same nature and certainly did not pose any direct threat to either of the two individuals who had complained to the RCMP. As such the Judge did not feel that the Crown’s argument that Mr. Christie be restricted in sharing disclosure with me was valid.

Judge Church also considered Doug Christie’s counter argument that it would be an unreasonable and onerous position to be placed in were he not allowed to share the information in any disclosure with his client unless I was under his direct supervision given the fact that he was in Victoria and I was 700 km away in Quesnel. Mr. Christie had indicated on December 19, 2012 that he and his client would be more than willing to sign an undertaking prohibiting me from disclosing any further confidential information in order to insure that no such breach occurred a second time. The Judge was able to see the logic of Mr. Christie’s arguments while at the same time dismissing Crown’s position that the breach in question could have endangered the two complainants and went on to say that while she would not be imposing the two original conditions that prohibited me from publishing on radicalpress.com or writing articles for publication wherever I so chose she would be issuing an order that would make it illegal for me republish any further disclosure. At this point she also stating she would not impose upon Mr. Christie the condition that he be in attendance whenever disclosing confidential documents to me.

Having read out her decision regarding the matters at hand the Judge reinstated the new bail conditions and asked me if I understood them. I acknowledged that I did. As such here are the new bail conditions under which I am now to legally abide by:

CONDITION ONE: You shall keep the peace and be of good behaviour.

CONDITION TWO: You shall have no contact or communication, directly or indirectly, with Richard Warman or Harry Abrams except as follows: (a) while in attendance at court; (b) through legal counsel.

CONDITION THREE: You shall not possess any weapon as defined in Section 2 of the criminal Code except for purposes directly related to your employment.

CONDITION FOUR: You shall not distribute, circulate or share all or any part of the Crown disclosure material with any person or organization.

CONDITION FIVE: You shall not publish or post all or any part of the Crown disclosure material on any internet site that can be read by the general public.

Having listened to the conditions of the new undertaking and given my consent to obey them the Judge then concluded the hearing. My wife and I then went for coffee and returned later to the Court Registry office where the undertaking was waiting for my signature. After signing it and obtaining a copy we left the building.

Included in the new undertaking was a notice stating that I would appear in court on April 2, 2013 at 1:30 pm PT in Quesnel for the preliminary hearing.

For some unknown reason Crown Council Jennifer Johnston was absent from the court room and another assistant Crown Council was sitting in for her.

So by all indications it looks like I will finally have some temporary respite from all the legal machinations that have been occurring over the past three months and I can focus on raising funds and adding further information to radicalpress.com that will assist others in understanding both the importance of this case and why it is that Canadians must sit up and pay much more attention to what these foreign lobbyists are doing to wreck our inherent right to freedom of expression and censor any and debate that focuses on the criminal and racist actions of the state of Israel and its dangerous and supremacist ideology known as Zionism.

Sincerely

Arthur Topham
Publisher & Editor
The Radical Press
“Digging to the root of the issues since 1998″

Filed Under: B'nai Brith Canada, B'nai Brith International, B.C. Supreme Court, Basi-Virk Trial, BC HATE CRIME TEAM, Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Canadian Judicial System, Crown Council Jennifer Johnston, Cst Normandie Levas BC HATE CRIME TEAM, Det-Cst Terry Wilson BC HATE CRIME TEAM, Douglas H. Christie, Editor's Zone, Free Speech, Free Speech on the Internet, Freedom of Expression, Freedom of Speech, Harry Abrams, Honourable Judge Church, Judaism, Political Zionism, Quesnel BC, Quesnel Court House, Quesnel RCMP, Radical Press, Radical Press Legal Update, RadicalPress.com, RCMP Corruption, Richard Warman

Richard Warman’s ‘Maximum Disruption’ Attacks upon Freedom of Speech in Canada from Marc Lemire at freedomsite.org

January 1, 2013 by admin Leave a Comment

Dear Free Speech supporters,

First I wish to thank Marc Lemire for sending along the information contained below. His valiant and courageous efforts over many years are worthy of our deepest appreciation.

The actions of the entity known as Richard Warman are definitely ones that Canadians should be more aware of. Given his propensity for decades of ongoing attacks against freedom of expression here in Canada I feel it behooves all Canadians to take a closer look at his conduct. In doing so people ought to ask themselves how in God’s name our legal system could permit someone like this to go on year after year running amok and getting away with his endless attempts at exploiting Canadian laws for the benefit of his own selfish gain, not to mention the tacit support given to those foreign Jewish lobby groups such as B’nai Brith Canada and the Canadian Jewish Congress; Zionist organizations hell-bent on silencing any and all legitimate criticism of their and Israel’s historic wrongs against humanity.

Warman of course is one of the two B’nai Brith Canada operatives who has been on my ass since 2007, doing his damnedest to shut down www.radicalpress.com and drive me into the hole financially. He’s not alone though for no man is an island unto himself when it comes to the “Jewish hate speech” racket that the Zionist and their lobbyist organizations have created and exploited throughout all the nations of the West since WWII in their ongoing efforts to cover up Zion’s endless crimes.

Back in 2007 when I was first charged with a sec. 13(1) “hate crime” complaint by Harry Abrams and the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada Warman wasn’t named on any of the documents. Had it not been for the fact that I was able to obtain a leaked email I would not have been aware of his surreptitious involvement in my case.

When word got out that I had received this Bolshevik/Zionist “show trial” accusative “complaint” document in my mailbox on November 20, 2007 my local newspaper, the Quesnel Cariboo Observer was interested in doing an interview with me on the subject. Having been a regular contributor to its Letters to the Editor section in the local community paper for over 35 years, plus a bi-weekly columnist, the locals in the community were obviously curious about this sudden complaint from the world’s largest Jewish lobby group.

On January 13, 2008 the Observer ran an article entitled, “TOPHAM VIEWS UNDER ATTACK: B’nai Brith claims anti-Jewish writings“. In the article was expressed my viewpoint and why I felt that B’nai Brith Canada was acting the way it was.

As soon as that story hit the streets Harry Abrams of the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada was on the telephone from Victoria, B.C. doing his utmost to browbeat and intimidate the journalist who had interviewed me for the article. It’s not the first time that ol’ Harry was found to be extremely abusive when dealing with those who he felt were not behaving as good goyim ought to behave when it comes to the questionable machinations of the Jewish state of Israel. Of course the journalist was not impressed one iota with Abrams’ manner of communication.

Soon afterwards Abrams wrote a response to the Letters section of the Observer wherein he did his best to bring up the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion and use that document as some sort of proof that I was posting hate literature against those of the Jewish faith. At the same time he basically demanded that I should remove all posts that he felt were unacceptable and if I did so then that would be the end of the matter. Of course his wishes never came true and beside, given the way that his co-conspirator Richard Warman operates, it’s highly doubtful that had I kowtowed to Abrams’ request that the matter would have ended. As we know from Warman’s relentless attacks upon Marc Lemire, AFTER MARC WILLINGLY REMOVED WHATEVER OFFENDING POSTS WERE ON A WEBSITE RAN BY HIM, complying with their Orwellian demands only makes these censorship control freaks that much more inclined to sink their fangs deeper into their perceived victims.

Following Abrams’ letter to the Editor which was published on January 27, 2008 the newspaper was flooded with letters of support for me that came from around the world. This was just too much for the cheeky Cheka twins, Abrams & Warman, and soon thereafter the owner and publisher of the Quesnel Cariboo Observer, David Black of Black Press (not associated with Conrad Black) received a letter from these two Zionist agents threatening his company with a law suit should it continue to publish any more articles related to the sec. 13 complaint that Abrams had laid against me via the Canadian Human Rights Commission (CHRC). Warman’s and Abrams’ argument was that the sec. 13(1) complaint was before the CHRC and no decision had yet been made so it was illegal for the Quesnel Cariboo Observer to be publishing anything pertaining to the matter. Of course, like all things that the Zionists say and do, it was pure bullshit.

There are NO legal restrictions in reporting on matters related to the machinations of the Zionist-controlled Canadian Human Rights Commission nor its accessory in crime, the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal. Both these Zionist infested orgs are considered to be quasi-judicial in nature and not subject to the same restrictions as the official Canadian Judicial System (even though it too is just as infested as the others with pro-Zionist sycophants).

And so the upshot of all of this was that Black Press decided it wouldn’t stand up for freedom of speech or to the Jewish lobby and ended up bending to the pressure of these two snivelling censorship snakes and from then on until June of this year a veil of silence hung over my six year long battle with these haters of free expression. That is why you will not be able to find the articles noted above except on my website where I was able to post them prior to their censorship by Black Press.

I’m writing this background information as an aid in understanding just how insane the court system has become since it’s been co-oped by the Jewish lobbyists and their pro-Zionist lawyers and judges who inevitably put the desires of Israel and the racist ideology of Zionism first and foremost when it comes to upholding the supposed rights and freedoms of all Canadians to expressing their views on the Internet.

When I was arrested back in May of 2012 Det-Cst Terry Wilson of the BC HATE CRIME TEAM made a big deal out of trying to convince me that their unit was going to be investigating these charges in a wholly new and unbiased manner and were not planning on bringing into the equation all of the past dealings that I had with these two bozos who had just laid the second sec. 319(2) charge against me; one that resulted in being jailed, losing my firearms and my computers and all of my electronic files and email going back many years.

But of course this was just another stinking pile of crap from another pro-Zionist special agent working for B’nai Brith along with Abrams and Warman. As it turned out later on I found that Det – Cst Wilson had been working with these zio-rats for many years before and all of this sudden new charge and arrest, etc. was nothing less than a further extension of their earlier attempts to shut me down and put me in jail in order to keep the truth about the Zionists hidden from the general public.

So please bear this in mind as you read through the list of vicious attacks perpetrated upon innocent people who have had their rights and freedoms suppressed, spent time in jail, and had their computers and files and firearms seized and their bank accounts drained all because of this one entity who should have been disbarred years ago and prevented from engaging in any legal activities.

Richard Warman is the epitome of all that is wrong with our Canadian legal system and anyone who has ever been harassed, threatened or victimized by this serial psychopathic complainer should be absolved of all accusations and convictions, their names cleared by the federal court and financially compensated for any and all legal costs incurred during their lengthy battles to retain their fundamental rights as given by Canada’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms. As an associate suggested after reading my initial comments here, “An application should be made, if it has not been done already, to have Warman declared a ‘Vexatious Litigant’ – there is ample precedent I think for this where an individual has persistently abused the system, an offence of which Warman is guilty, in spades! The fact that he has been clearly motivated by malice and personal financial gain and assists a subversive political lobby, would reinforce the application.”

Nothing less in terms of redress ought to be considered when it comes to Richard Warman. Apart from disbarment, a healthy jail sentence of say five years ought to give this traitorous Zionist lackey enough time to reflect on his actions and prepare for a new career upon his release.

With the end of 2012 only hours away I’d like to take one final parting shot at this whole sordid affair known as Zionism. After years and years of researching its fundamentals and observing its ideology in action I’ve come to the only conclusion that I feel any honest, decent human being could be expected to reach. Zionism is, in truth, a mental disease. It’s a psychotic, delusional state of mind wherein adherents to its core cognitive structure and values – all contingent upon a mental belief that one small segment of the human family or species is somehow above and separate from all the rest of humanity – tend to behave in a cult-like fashion in order to outwardly express this political (psycho-mental philosophy) doctrine; one that sees no wrong in the destruction and murder and terrorization of any and all other human beings who stand in the way of its ultimate fulfillment. I can also state with added assurance that the new year will see more and more reasonable, intelligent and caring, loving individuals come to a similar conclusion as the weight of evidence backing such a contention grows heavier and heavier and the Zionist Beast grows more and more desperate and deranged in its behaviour.

God grant that we will stop it before the destruction gets beyond our control.

The best to all of you in 2013!

Love & Peace & Justice for All,

Arthur Topham
Publisher & Editor
The Radical Press
“Digging to the root of the issues since 1998″

________________________________

From: Marc Lemire <marc@lemire.com>

Subject: Richard Warman’s ‘Maximum Disruption’ Approach: Defamation Suits, Criminal Complaints, Section 13 cases and even Copyright Act lawsuits

Date: 31 December, 2012 1:01:18 AM PST

Richard Warman’s ‘Maximum Disruption’ Approach:

Defamation Suits, Criminal Complaints, Section 13 cases and even Copyright Act lawsuits

http://blog.freedomsite.org/2012/12/richard-warmans-maximum-disruption.html

http://canadianhumanrightscommission.blogspot.ca/2012/12/richard-warmans-maximum-disruption.html

Richard Warman is one of Canada’s leading serial complainants. Richard Warman described his tactic of filing complaints as “Maximum Disruption” in a speech he gave to a group called Anti-Racist Action. According to Mr. Warman; “This approach involved working with the police, the Canadian Human Rights Commission and other organizations to create “maximum disruption” within what he perceives to be the Neo-Nazi movement in Canada.”

Here is a list of some of the lawsuits and other complaints he has filed:

—————————————————–

People Richard Warman has sued or threatened to sue

Alphabetically sorted

	Person	Court file # or Source
1)	3535991 Canada Inc.	Ontario Court File No. 12-55389
2)	Andrea Rondeau	Ontario Court File No. 10-47357
3)	Andrew Spencer (Droid1963)	Ontario Court File No. 07-CV-039927SR
4)	Arnie Lemaire	Ontario Court File No. 09-46638
5)	Banyen Books	Ontario Court File No. 02-CV-237691SR
6)	BC Libraries Association	Macleans Magazine: April 21, 2008
7)	Biosfaire	Ontario Court File No. 02-CV-237691SR
8)	Black Press Group Ltd.	http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=684
9)	Boule De Neige	Ontario Court File No. 02-CV-237691SR
10)	Bridge of LovePublications	Ontario Ontario Court File No. 02-CV-237691SR
11)	Byron Tau	http://btau.blogspot.com/2008/04/my-own-tiny-role-in-canadas-biggest.html
12)	Canadian Association for Free Expression	Ontario Court File No: 04-CV-26550SR
13)	Canoe Inc.	Ontario Court File No. 12-53851
14)	Canwest Digital Media	Ontario Court File No. 10-47357
15)	Canwest Global Communications Corp	Ontario Court File No. 10-47357
16)	Canwest Interactive	Ontario Court File No. 10-47357
17)	Canwest Limited Partnership	Ontario Court File No. 10-47357
18)	Canwest Mediaworks Inc.	Ontario Court File No. 10-47357
19)	Canwest Mediaworks Publications Inc.	Ontario Court File No. 10-47357
20)	Canwest Publishing Inc.	Ontario Court File No. 10-47357
21)	Catherine McMillan	Ontario Court File No: 08-CV-352197SR
22)	Constance Fournier	Ontario Court File No. 07-CV-039927SR
23)	Constance Fournier	Ontario Court File No: 08-CV-352197SR
24)	Constance Fournier	Ontario Court File No. 08-CV-352212SR
25)	Cowichan Valley Citizen	Ontario Court File No. 10-47357
26)	Crossroads Television System Inc.	Ontario Court File No. 10-49969
27)	Dan Lepage (SaskBigPicture)	Ontario Court File No. 07-CV-039927SR
28)	Eternal Moment Bookstore	Ontario Court File No. 02-CV-237691SR
29)	Ezra Levant	Ontario Court File No: 08-CV-352197SR
30)	Ezra Levant	Ontario Court File No. CV-09-00370919
31)	Ezra Levant	Ontario Court File No. 12-53851
32)	Ezra Levant	Ontario Court File No. 12-55389
33)	Fivefeetoffury.com	Ontario Court File No: 08-CV-352197SR
34)	Freedominion.ca	Ontario Court File No: 08-CV-352197SR
35)	Freedominion.ca	Ontario Court File No. 08-CV-352212SR
36)	Global TV Calgary	Ontario Court File No. 10-47357
37)	Global TV Lethbridge	Ontario Court File No. 10-47357
38)	Jason Bertucci (Faramir)	Ontario Court File No. 07-CV-039927SR
39)	Jason Ouwendyk	Ontario Small Claims Court File No. 03-SC-081720
40)	John Doe (conscience)	Ontario Court File No. 07-CV-039927SR
41)	John Doe (HR-101)	Ontario Court File No. 07-CV-039927SR
42)	John Doe (Klinxx)	Ontario Court File No. 07-CV-039927SR
43)	John Doe (Padraigh)	Ontario Court File No. 07-CV-039927SR
44)	Jonathan Kay	Ontario Court File No: 08-CV-352197SR
45)	Kamloops Public Library	BC Civil Liberties Press Release:http://www.bccla.org/pressreleases/04libelandslander.htm
46)	Kathy Shaidle	Ontario Court File No: 08-CV-352197SR
47)	Kathy Shaidle	Ontario Court File No. 12-53851
48)	Kelly McParland	Ontario Court File No. CV-09-00370919
49)	Knowledge Bookstore	Ontario Court File No. 02-CV-237691SR
50)	Mark Fournier	Ontario Court File No: 08-CV-352197SR
51)	Mark Fournier	Ontario Court File No. 07-CV-039927SR
52)	Mark Fournier	Ontario Court File No. 08-CV-352212SR
53)	Michael Coren	Ontario Court File No. 10-49969
54)	Michael Coren	Ontario Court File No. 12-53851
55)	Michael Veck	Ontario Court File No. CV-10-410527
56)	National Post Company	Ontario Court File No: 08-CV-352197SR
57)	National Post Company	Ontario Court File No. CV-09-00370919
58)	Northern Alliance	Ontario Small Claims Court File No. 03-SC-081720
59)	Paul Fromm	Ontario Court File No: 04-CV-26550SR
60)	Preferred Network	Ontario Court File No. 02-CV-237691SR
61)	Quebecor Media Inc.	Ontario Court File No. 12-53851
62)	Quebecor Media Inc.	Ontario Court File No. 12-55389
63)	Quesnel Cariboo Observer (Newspaper)	http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=684
64)	Roger Smith (Peter O’ Donnell)	Ontario Court File No. 07-CV-039927SR
65)	Russell McOrmond	http://www.digital-copyright.ca/node/2603
66)	Seekers Books	Ontario Court File No. 02-CV-237691SR
67)	Shirley Skolos	Ontario Court File No. 10-47357
68)	Smalldeadanimals.com	Ontario Court File No: 08-CV-352197SR
69)	Sun Media Corporation	Ontario Court File No. 12-53851
70)	Sun Media Corporation	Ontario Court File No. 12-55389
71)	Sun TV News General Partnership	Ontario Court File No. 12-55389
72)	The McGill Tribune	http://btau.blogspot.com/2008/04/my-own-tiny-role-in-canadas-biggest.html
73)	Thompson Nicola Regional Public Libraries	Macleans Magazine: April 21, 2008
74)	Tom Kennedy	Ontario Court File No. 02-CV-237691SR
75)	Toronto Public Library	Toronto Public Library: MATERIALS REVIEW COMMITTEE RECONSIDERATION OF MATERIALS SUMMARY – 2002
76)	TVA Group Inc.	Ontario Court File No. 12-55389
77)	Vancouver Public Library	BC Civil Liberties Press Release:http://www.bccla.org/pressreleases/04libelandslander.htm
78)	Victoria Indymedia	http://www.digital-copyright.ca/node/3102
79)	Victoria Public Library	BC Civil Liberties Press Release:http://www.bccla.org/pressreleases/04libelandslander.htm
80)	Walker Morrow	Ontario Court File No. 10-47357
81)	William Grosvenor	Ontario Court File No. 08-CV-40460SR

Lawsuits filed under Canada’s Copyright Act

1)	Richard Warman and National Post v Mark and Constance Fournier	Federal Court of Canada: T-784-11
2)	Richard Warman and National Post v Mark and Constance Fournier	Federal Court of Appeal: A-395-12

Section 13 Complaints by Richard Warman

Cases before the CHRC and/or Canadian Human Rights Tribunal

1	T726_3102	FRED KYBURZ
2	T998/11804	Eldon Warman
3	T869/11903	Alexan Kulbashian,
4	T869/11903	James Scott Richardson,
5	T869/11903	Tri-city Skins.com,
6	T869/11903	Canadian Ethnic Cleansing Team,
7	T869/11903	Affordable Space.com
8	T1021/0205	Tomasz Winnicki
9	T1072/5305	Craig Harrison
10	T1071/5205	Peter Kouba
11	T1088/6905	Glenn Bahr
12	T1087/6805	Western Canada for Us
13	T1104/8505	Terry Tremaine
14	20031846	Alex Di Civita
15	20031844	Liz Lampman
16	T1095/7605	Bobby Wilkinson
17	T1095/7605	“Canadian Nazi Party”
18	T1106/8705	Jessica Beaumont
19	T1073/5405	Marc Lemire
20	20031956	Freedomsite .org
21	T1090/7105	Melissa Guille
22	T1090/7105	Canadian Heritage Alliance
23		Ciaran Paul Donnelly
24	20030360	WCOTC (World Church of the Creator)
25	T1217/2907	Jason Ouwendyk
26	T1216/2807	Northern Alliance

Criminal Complaints by Richard Warman

1	Alexan Kulbashian	Warman’s Testimony in Lemire Case
2	Arthur Topham	http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=1405
3	Bill White	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Warman
4	Ciarian Donnelly	Warman’s Testimony in Lemire Case
5	Craig Harrison	Warman’s Testimony in Lemire Case
6	Freedomsite	Warman’s Testimony in Lemire Case
7	Glenn Bahr	Warman’s Testimony in Lemire Case
8	James Richardson	Warman’s Testimony in Lemire Case
9	Jessica Beaumont	Warman’s Testimony in Lemire Case
10	Marc Lemire	Warman’s Testimony in Lemire Case
11	Peter Kouba	Warman’s Testimony in Lemire Case
12	Terry Tremaine	www.freedominion.ca/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?f=70&t=159251
13	William Grosvenor	Warman Speech – University of Moncton – March 16, 2010

Please note, for all cases; please refer to the original source material. In the case of the Libel suits, where the source is indicated as a court file, that is an actual lawsuit Warman has filed. Where the source is something other, like a URL, please refer to the originating material. This may or may not be a lawsuit or threatened lawsuit by Warman. The truths of the statements are via the websites.
Please refer to the original source material. This document consists of an overview of cases which (it appears that) Warman has filed or threatened. This is not a complete list. There may be many other cases in all categories, including criminal complaints, libel complaints, Section 13 cases, etc.
If any mistakes are made of this page, please send an email to; marc@lemire.com for correction.

Richard Warman’s ‘Maximum Disruption’ Approach:

Defamation Suits, Criminal Complaints, Section 13 cases and even Copyright Act lawsuits

http://blog.freedomsite.org/2012/12/richard-warmans-maximum-disruption.html

http://canadianhumanrightscommission.blogspot.ca/2012/12/richard-warmans-maximum-disruption.html

_______________________________

NOTE: My apologies for having to include the following appeal but out of necessity, I am forced to ask for financial assistance in this ongoing battle with the foreign interest censors who are determined to stop all freedom of expression in Canada. Due to the fact that the Crown is refusing to give the required disclosure to my lawyer I am not able to apply for legal aid. This leaves me in the unenviable position of having to rely solely upon donations to pay for my legal expenses.

The day after my lawyer’s appearance in Quesnel on the 19th of December I received an invoice showing a balance of $5,222.79 still owing on Mr. Christie’s account. Given my minimal monthly pension of approximately $1400.00 out of which I must pay my mortgage and utilities and insurance on home and vehicles (this doesn’t cover additional costs for fuel and food) which come to approximately $1200.00 one can see that it’s virtually impossible for me to cover these expenses without further assistance from supporters.

As such I would once again implore readers to give serious consideration to helping me out by either sending a donation via PayPal using either a PayPal account or a credit card or else sending a cheque or Money Order or cash to me via snail mail at the following postal address. Cash of course also works. Please don’t make the cheque out to “RadicalPress” as that account is no longer available to me.

Arthur Topham

4633 Barkerville Highway

Quesnel, B.C.

Canada

V2J 6T8

To access my PayPal button please go to either the Home Page at http://www.radicalpress.com or my blog http://www.quesnelcariboosentinel.com The PayPal button is up on the right hand corner of the Home Page on either site. Feel free to click on it.

Sincerely,

Arthur Topham

Pub/Ed

The Radical Press

Filed Under: "hate speech", Abrams/B'nai Brith Canada v. Arthur Topham and RadicalP, Alternative Media, Anti-Defamation League (ADL), anti-Semitism, Anti-terrorism Act, Arthur Topham - Editor & Publisher, B'nai Brith, B'nai Brith Canada, B'nai Brith International, BC HATE CRIME TEAM, Bolsheviks, Canadian Human Rights Act, Canadian Human Rights Commission, Canadian Human Rights Tribunal, Canadian Jewish Congress, Canadian Judicial System, Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Cst Normandie Levas BC HATE CRIME TEAM, Det-Cst Terry Wilson BC HATE CRIME TEAM, Douglas H. Christie, Editor's Zone, Free Speech on the Internet, Freedom of Expression, Freedom of Speech, George Orwell, Harry Abrams, Hate Crime laws, Internet Freedom, Israeli Terrorism, Jewish Banking Cartel, Jewish Defense League (JDL), Jewish Lobby Groups, Jewish Media Monopoly, Jewish Racism, Jewish Supremacism, Jewish Talmudists, Jewish Terrorists, League for Human Rights of B'nai Brith Canada, Radical Press, RadicalPress.com, RCMP Corruption, Richard Warman, Rothschild Zionist Criminal Cartel, Royal Canadian Mounted Police, Sec. 319(2) CC "Willful Promotion of Hatred", Section 13 of CHRA, Section 13(1), The Controversy of Zion, The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, Ukrainian Holocaust, World Zionist Organization

Marc Lemire Case: the latest attack on Freedom of Speech by the Canadian Human Rights Commission

December 26, 2012 by admin Leave a Comment

Marc Lemire Case: the latest attack on Freedom of Speech by the Canadian Human Rights Commission

Christopher di Armani

http://christopherdiarmani.com/8968/big-brother/marc-lemire-case-latest-attack-freedom-speech-canadian-human-rights-commission/

I had a long conversation with Marc Lemire on Wednesday evening, December 19, 2012.

For those not familiar with his name, Marc Lemire is the one and only man to ever win a case against the Canadian Human Rights Commission (CHRC). Until Lemire was hauled before this Kangaroo Court the Canadian Human Rights Commission had a 100% conviction rate.

It’s really not that hard when the Truth is no defense and the “judge” can disallow any evidence you present without justifying that action.

Anyway, there was a development in his case this week that does not bode well for the Rights and Freedoms of ALL Canadians. Marc Lemire just happens to be the person being terrorised in this particular manner today.

It is important to remember a few things about Marc Lemire’s case.

1. As soon as Marc Lemire was made aware of the complaints against him, he removed the “offending material” from his website.

2. Despite the “offending material” being removed from the internet, the CHRC refused to drop the case against Mr. Lemire.

3. Repeated attempts by Marc Lemire and his lawyer Barbara Kulaszka at mediation with the CHRC was refused. This wasn’t about “remediation” as the law says, but about silencing individuals with whom the CHRC disagrees.

4. Marc Lemire was found “guilty” of a single infraction. That infraction was for a post on his website that he did NOT create, and contained an article written by an American author. Marc Lemire had nothing to do with the “offending” post, other than to host the website it was on.

5. The Canadian Human Rights Tribunal in Marc Lemire’s case admitted that Section 13 of the Human Rights Act is unconstitutional.

6. The Canadian Human Rights Tribunal in Marc Lemire’s case refused to administer the penalty against him because they knew it was unconstitutional.

7. The Canadian Parliament has already repealed Section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act. It is waiting for the Canadian Senate to pass it as well, which will happen early this coming year, and then Section 13 will be repealed.

8. Despite all these facts, the boneheads at the CHRC are now pushing for a lifetime BAN on Marc Lemire’s Freedom of Speech while they still can.

They’re desperate to implement their ban on Marc Lemire while this atrocious law is still on the books.

Once Lemire is stripped of his Freedom of Speech by a federal court order, it won’t matter if Section 13 is repealed or ruled unconstitutional. The lifetime ban will still apply.

That is wrong on so many levels I don’t even know where to begin.

Marc Lemire is now battling for his (and OUR) Right to Freedom of Speech on two fronts.

First, at the Federal Court of Appeals, where he is appealing the finding of Justice Mosley. Mosley found that Section 13 was constitutional, but that Section 54 (the penalty clause) was not.

It’s an absurd decision and one that Marc Lemire is fighting to overturn with his appeal. Lemire has also filed a 240 page motion to the Federal Court of Appeals requesting a stay of the earlier Federal Court ruling so the CHRC cannot issue a lifetime speech ban against him.

Second, at the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal, where Lemire will fight the proposed lifetime ban.

If Freedom of Speech is important to you, then please give generously to Marc Lemire’s Legal Defense Fund. He desperately needs your help as he fights for the Right to Freedom of Speech for ALL Canadians.

You can donate with your check via Canada Post, payable to:

Marc Lemire
Attn: Free Speech Legal Defence Fund
762 Upper James St, Suite 384
Hamilton, ON L9C 3A2

If you would prefer to give online, please send your donation via PayPal.

Anyone giving $50 or more to Marc Lemire’s Legal Defense Fund will receive a digital copy of Lemire’s book Dismantling Tyranny.

Remember… The choice is Free Speech or Approved Speech. If Marc Lemire loses this case, Canadians will forever be subjected to “Approved Speech” by minions of The State.

That’s not the kind of Canada I want to live in, and I hope you feel the same. Support Marc Lemire’s fight for OUR Right to Freedom of Speech without government intervention.

————————-

You can see the article online at: http://christopherdiarmani.com/8968/big-brother/marc-lemire-case-latest-attack-freedom-speech-canadian-human-rights-commission/

Filed Under: Barbara Kulaszka, Canadian Association for Free Expression (CAFE), Canadian Charter of Rights & Freedoms, Canadian Civil Liberties Association, Canadian Federation of Chabad Lubavitch, Canadian Free Speech League, Canadian Human Rights Act, Canadian Human Rights Commission, Canadian Human Rights Tribunal, Canadian Identity/Sovereignty, Canadian Jewish Congress, Canadian Judicial System, Canadian Rights and Freedom Bulletin, Charter of Rights & Freedoms, Christopher Diarmani, Editor's Zone, Free Speech, Free Speech on the Internet, Freedom of Expression, Freedom of Speech, Marc Lemire, Richard Warman

Radical Press Legal Update #7

December 20, 2012 by admin Leave a Comment

Radical Press Legal Update #7

Yesterday’s Bail Hearing was a three hour session in the Quesnel Court house.

The regular Judge who has been presiding over the various applications thus far was unable to attend and instead we had a female Judge by the name of M. Church who heard the application.

Crown of course had first kick at the cat and Crown Council Jennifer Johnston opened her remarks by giving Judge Church a brief overview of the case which included her reasons for why Crown has still not provided my lawyer with full disclosure in the case.

According to CC Johnston the period from my initial arrest on May 16, 2012 until October 9, 2012 had proven to be an insufficient time period in order to get enough evidence together so that an Indictment could be handed down by the October 9 deadline and that, apparently, somehow justified not providing Mr. Christie with full disclosure.

After the October 9 deadline I was no longer under the original bail conditions that restricted me from posting on my website although for some odd reason I didn’t become aware of this fact until close to 3 weeks after the fact .

The Crown eventually got their sworn information on November 5, 2012 and notified my lawyer that there would be a call date set for Nov. 6 where I was to appear in court. That date was subsequently changed to the 8th of November as Doug Christie was out in Saskatchewan attending to another case and couldn’t appear via telephone on the 6th. It was Crown’s letter to Mr. Christie on Nov. 5th that also informed him that Crown had asked for an endorsed warrant that would allow Crown to have all of the original bail conditions reinstated.

When I appeared on November 8, 2012 the Judge listened to both sides of the arguments and ruled that only some of the original conditions would remain i.e., those concerning my order not to have any contact with the two knaves (Warman and Abrams) who laid the alleged complaint to the RCMP and also the cops hanging on to my illegally stolen firearms. At the same time he set a new date of December 13, 2012 when Mr. Christie could be in court to represent me and Crown would be given the opportunity to argue for the reinstatement of the additional restrictions originally imposed on me by Det – Cst Terry Wilson on the day I got out of jail.

Of course December 13, 2012 proved to be bad timing weather wise and my lawyer was unable to fly into Quesnel that day so again a decision on Crown’s application was delayed for another week which brought it up to December 19, 2012 which was yesterday.

After running through that time line Crown then began their argument for wanting to reinstate the additional Orwellian restraints that would prohibit me from posting articles anywhere on the Internet available to the general public or to allow anyone else to post on any of my other websites that were owned by me.

Just prior to commencing her argument Crown Council Jennifer Johnston told Judge Church that unfortunately she hadn’t been able to provide Mr. Christie with the big fat 1″ thick bail disclosure document because she had been informed by Det – Cst Terry Wilson that when the Indictment was handed down the National Post had published an article on the case which contained statements that the reporter had gleaned from another website called FreeDominion.ca. Those statements were from what is called a “Warned” statement which is considered by the courts to be part of disclosure and therefore confidential information that is not supposed to be given out to the public. The Warned statement was a digital voice recording that Det – Cst Terry Wilson had made of his conversation with me just prior to my release from jail on May 16, 2012. Why IT was given to my lawyer when all the other disclosure documents are still being withheld by Crown is still a mystery to both myself and Mr. Christie but in the case of this particular document when I received a copy of it I didn’t realize it was confidential and had so I had shared it with an associate in a private email and unbeknownst to myself failed to notify them that it was confidential.

Anyhow a couple of quotes were taken from it and posted in the National Post and that was the big reason, according to CC Jennifer Johnston why she was refusing to divulge any more disclosure materials to Mr. Christie. This issue had come up on Dec. 13 when Crown was arguing before Judge Morgan that a second application had been filed regarding the matter of the illegal disclosure but no agreement could be found at the time and Mr. Christie had refused to agree to it.

At this point Crown told Judge Church that she would be willing to let Mr. Christie take a look at the bail disclosure document even though Crown’s application had not be resolved but that he would have to give it back at the end of the hearing! All of this was the typical Catch-22 scenarios that have been playing out since day one of this charade.

The Judge obviously knew that Mr. Christie couldn’t be expected to argue against something he hadn’t even seen so after a bit of discussion it was agreed that Crown would give Mr. Christie the disclosure document and a short 15 recess would be called so that he and I would have an opportunity to take a look at what Crown was planning to use in their argument for reinstating the original harsh bail conditions on me.

It only took about 5 minutes of perusing the document to realize what was going to be the Crown’s argument and we quickly went back and let the clerk know that the recess should end as soon as possible and court resume. Mr. Christie was well aware of the time constraints and needed every minute for his arguments.

Court resumed and Crown Council Johnston began her argument that I had been publishing all these articles, updates, etc. since November 2, 2012 (legally, mind you) and then proceeded to go through individual posts selecting various quotes to back up her position. It was the standard Zionist double-speak argument that posts were continuing to spread hate toward the Jews and Zionists and were attacking unfairly Det -Cst Terry Wilson and his partner-in-crime Cst Normandie Levas and thus possibly endangering their safety!

This went on until about 3 p.m. when she finally concluded her remarks and a break was taken before Mr. Christie was given time to present his arguments.

The issue of the leaked disclosure was addressed first and Mr. Christie told that Judge that he would have no problem with the Court issuing an Order stating that in future neither he nor myself would disclose any confidential information to any third parties not directly connected to the case and definitely not for publication.

Doug then commenced his argument with a bountiful supply of case law references and quickly outlined for the Judge some precedents which included the legal right for publishers and writers to criticize both Jews and Zionists citing articles in various mainstream publications like the New York Times and other Zionist controlled media. His point being that no particular group is exempt from criticism and that includes Jews or those who support political Zionism. Regarding my criticisms of the RCMP he also pointed out to the court that the RCMP were certainly not above criticism and given their public image of late he didn’t feel Crown’s argument in this regard was worthy of consideration.

He also made it crystal clear that what Crown was attempting to do flew in the face any and all statutes currently within the Canadian legal system. By that I mean Crown’s attempt to curtail my Charter Rights to freedom of expression and access to the Internet prior to my case being heard in a court of law and a decision being handed down as to whether or not I did in fact publish materials that were ultimately deemed to be “willful promotion of hatred” as contained in sec. 319(2) of the Canadian Criminal Code.

To a priori assume that whatever I am publishing is “hatred” and then ask the court to impose such severe curtailments upon my Charter rights prior to being tried is verboten and should not be considered as a reasonable argument.

During Crown’s argument CC Johnston had cited the Basi-Virk Trial (of all trials!) to back up some of her comments regarding the need to protect witnesses. In this instances she was trying to correlate my Warned statement conversation with Det – Cst Terry Wilson with that of secondary witnesses in the Basi-Verk case. When Doug came to this he quickly pointed out to the Judge the vast difference between witness evidence by anonymous third parties and statements directly given to the arresting officer by the accused as was the case in point regarding Crown’s argument.

One by one Mr. Christie countered Crown Council’s arguments and this went on until around 4:15 p.m. at which time Mr. Christie concluded his remarks by informing the Judge that he had a plane to catch before 5 p.m. and that he would have to stop. Doug asked me at this point to call the airport to confirm the exact time when the plane was leaving so I had to leave the court room for about five minutes.

While I was gone Crown apparently tried to refute all of Doug’s arguments and told the Judge that because I was charged with a “Hate” crime that Crown could then basically impose whatever restrictions they wanted to on me. The Judge apparently wasn’t convinced and just when I got back into the court room I heard her telling Crown and Defence that she would be considering the arguments and submitting a request to another body (not sure which one at this point) for further clarification come early January and then after that she would notify Crown and Defence of her decision.

So basically there will be no further bail conditions imposed on myself until January of 2013 at the earliest. We quickly packed up our things and drove Doug out to the airport where he bid us a fond fair well.

For now we will finally have a couple of weeks grace in order to relax a bit and enjoy the Christmas season.

——–

NOTE: Out of necessity I am forced to ask for financial assistance in this ongoing battle with the censors. Due to the fact that the Crown is refusing to give the required disclosure to my lawyer I am not able to furnish legal aid with the required documents that they demand before looking at whether or not I might qualify for legal financial assistance. This leaves me in the unenviable position of having to rely solely upon donations to pay for my legal expenses. The airfare alone yesterday for my lawyer to appear in court in Quesnel to defend me against these false charges was $1,050.00 return and given my minimal monthly pension it’s virtually impossible for me to cover these expenses.

As such I would once again implore readers to give serious consideration to helping me out by either sending a donation via PayPal using either a PayPal account or a credit card or else sending a cheque or Money Order to me via snail mail at the following postal address. Cash of course also works.

Arthur Topham
4633 Barkerville Highway
Quesnel, B.C.
Canada
V2J 6T8

To access my PayPal button please go to either the Home Page at http://www.radicalpress.com or my blog http://www.quesnelcariboosentinel.com The PayPal button is up on the right hand corner of the Home Page on either site.

Sincerely,

Arthur Topham
Pub/Ed
The Radical Press

Filed Under: "hate speech", Abrams/BBC v. Arthur Topham & RadicalPress.com, Alternative Media, Arthur Topham - Editor & Publisher, Attorney General of B.C., B'nai Brith, B'nai Brith Canada, B'nai Brith International, B.C. Criminal Justice Branch, Basi-Verk Trial, BC HATE CRIME TEAM, BC Justice Minister Shirley Bond, BC Rail Scandal, Canadian Charter of Rights & Freedoms, Canadian Free Speech League, Canadian Human Rights Act, Canadian Human Rights Commission, Canadian Identity/Sovereignty, Canadian Jewish Congress, Canadian Judicial System, Charter of Rights & Freedoms, Crown Council Jennifer Johnston, Cst Normandie Levas BC HATE CRIME TEAM, Det-Cst Terry Wilson BC HATE CRIME TEAM, Douglas H. Christie, Editor's Zone, Free Speech, Free Speech on the Internet, Freedom of Expression, Freedom of Speech, FreeDominion.ca, Harry Abrams, Hate Crime laws, Highway of Tears, Internet Freedom, Jewish Lobby Groups, Judge M. Church, Judge Morgan, National Post, National(Zionist)Post, Political Prisoners, Political Zionism, Quesnel BC, Quesnel Court House, Quesnel RCMP, Radical Press, RCMP Corruption, Richard Warman, Rothschild Zionist Criminal Cartel, Sec. 319(2) CC "Willful Promotion of Hatred", The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, Zionism

B’nai Brith, ADL, Child Porn, Regina and Arthur Topham by Arthur Topham

December 17, 2012 by admin 1 Comment

B’nai Brith, ADL, Child Porn, Regina and Arthur Topham

Arthur Topham

December 17, 2012

From the very beginning of my longstanding legal battle with B’nai Brith Canada and the International Jewish Lobby it has been my intention to point a fierce yet truthful finger at World Jewry: the primary purpose being to bring to the forefront for Canadians the true identity and purpose of these front organizations that the Zionists have set up over the past couple of centuries to deceive the gullible goyim (non-Jews) on multiple levels.

A prime example of how, like clockwork, Zionists inevitably resort to the same tactics over and over, is the recent behaviour by the Crown in my upcoming sec. 319(2) CCC “Hate Crime” case involving B’nai Brith Canada and the RCMP’s Det-Cst Terry Wilson of the “BC HATE CRIME TEAM”.

In my last Legal Update #6 published on December 14, 2012 reference was made to the fact that I would publish an article related to the subject of this incident that took place (again) during my last court appearance on December 13, 2012).

Since the onset of the false allegations brought on by Richard Warman and Harry Abrams of B’nai Brith Canada that led to my arrest on May 16, 2012 the Crown has done its damnedest to portray me in a false and negatively perverse light.

Beginning with my first appearance in the Quesnel court room Crown Council Jennifer Johnston immediately began her vilification of my person by resorting to “case law” (examples from former court cases used as precedents that purported prove similar intent and purpose) that equated the cases referenced by her to my own situation with respect to the articles which I have posted on RadicalPress.com.

The “case” in point here being the Crown’s feeble and malicious attempt to suggest to the presiding Judge that articles published on RadicalPress.com are of the same revulsive caliber as photographs and videos of child pornography and sexual abuse that are illegally posted on the Internet and exchanged between perverts via email and that when it comes to any consideration on the part of the Judge as to the degree and severity of bail conditions that ought to be imposed upon me during the course of this bolshevik show trial that this fallacious argument on Crown’s part ought to be given serious consideration so that I would not be permitted to continue to post anything further on the website or possibly even be permitted to email friends and associates.

This, dear lover of freedom of speech, is the degree of chutzpah (arrogance) and deception which permeates not only the mindset of the Jewish lobbies around the world but also that supposedly impartial, independent and august body within Canada’s judicial system (the Crown) which is currently doing the bidding of this foreign agent of Israel – B’nai Brith Canada.

One of the hallmarks of Zionist thinking is to turn whatever truth exists upon its head and then attempt to portray the actual perpetrator of a crime as the innocent victim and nowhere will you find a better example than in the case of sexual perversion, child pornography, deviancy of all types and the secretive masonic order known to the world as B’nai Brith.

I might add too at this point that it’s a known fact, boldly and unabashedly announced by the perpetrators themselves, that the global porn industry was initiated by and has been controlled by Jews since the very beginning. Anyone doubting this need only type into the Google search engine the aforementioned topic and they will find this simple fact out for themselves.

In my own case because of these false allegations made against my person, my life’s work and Truth itself I will site two precedent setting cases that show both the hypocrisy and the deceit that this purportedly “benevolent Jewish society” has projected upon the public’s perception via their controlled media over the past century.

The first is a recent incident that actually took place at the time when I was battling with the Canadian Human Rights Act’s sec. 13(1) complaint that Harry Abrams and the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada had filed against me back in 2007.

During the course of that long and protracted exchange of arguments and motions that eventually led to a decision by the Canadian Human Rights Commission to uphold and lend credence to the complaint; one which eventually moved the case into the hands of the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal (another communist/zionist style, quasi-judicial body of appointed Zionists doing the bidding of their taskmasters from Israel) B’nai Brith’s touted moral superiority and unblemished integrity suffered a serious blow when one of their former Canadian directors of B’nai Brith Quebec, Bill Surkis, was arrested and charged on May 29, 2009 with possession of 86 videos containing close to nine hours of footage showing men engaged in sexual abuse of under children between the ages of six and fourteen. On top of the videos were an additional 153 photos also showing children being abused.

To add insult to injury Surkis’s lawyer Steven Slimovich (no pun intended!) at first attempted to convince the Crown that his client had all this porn on his computer for “The purpose of his viewing the child pornography material [in order] to educate himself on the topic of child pornography” so that afterwards he would be able to “go into schools and give lectures on people abusing people.”! That, I suggest, is the sort of chutzpah one continually confronts whenever this touted “benevolent” front organization gets caught with its pants down.

Of course even the Crown in this instance couldn’t pretend to fall for such a scam and they had to prosecute Surkis but given the severity of the charges: all three – possessing, accessing and distributing of child pornography – each carrying a maximum penalty on conviction of 10 years in prison, the final outcome of the trial which included plea bargaining to drop the “distributing child pornography” charge was one that showed the powerful influence of the Jewish lobby when it comes to protecting one of their own.

Out of a total of possibly 30 years imprisonment for the three initial charges what did this former registered lobbyist and Quebec Regional Director of B’nai Brith Canada, board chairman for the Holocaust Memorial Museum and Academic Dean of John Abbott College for 22 years receive as punishment for his crimes? Why a grand total of 45 days in jail to be served on weekends, the minimum sentencing allowed under the law!

Oi veh is all I can say!

Yet in my own case, where a conviction for a said sec. 319(2) CCC “Hate Crime” carries a maximum 2 year sentence, do you think that were the Crown to win their case that they would sentence me to say a relatively similar punishment of 5 to 10 days in jail to be served on weekends? Fat chance!

And so it’s fairly evident by now, given Crown Council Jennifer Johnston’s repeated references to Judge Morgan directly associating RadicalPress.com’s articles with child pornography, that her motive is designed to convince the Judge that extremely severe restrictions are justified and must be imposed upon me to prohibit me from writing and publishing any further (pornographic?) articles in my own defence or providing updated information to my long list of supporters and donors who are helping me (and themselves) in this battle to retain my Charter right to freedom of speech on the Internet.

One final irksome comment in this regard. Sturkis’ lawyer Slimovich also did his best to insure that his client, a “stellar” member of his Jewish community, who he stated was a “staunch individual” who “stood up for what is right” would not lose his privilege of retaining his home computer so that he could “continue to serve” his community. Whether he gained that right I was at this point unable to determine.

The second example is one that I will touch upon only briefly but will furnish readers with an url to a website where they can read about it in depth so as to understand the duration of time that has passed since this “benevolent” charity called B’nai Brith that has been fronting as a philanthropy organization for the past hundred years and longer first began their attempts at covering the blood soaked tracks of their membership via the use of their mainstream media propaganda mechanisms using both print and television to gain their dubious ends.

Today the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) of B’nai Brith is the foremost American Jewish watch dog and lobbyist for the state of Israel and for support of the Zionist ideology that buttresses said state’s political doctrines. Its influence in the USA is notoriously well known and its victims are legion since its inception back in the year 1913. The following “case” exposes the history behind why B’nai Brith created the ADL in the first place and it serves as yet another reminder of what this essay is trying to do, i.e. expose B’nai Brith’s true identity and its historic links with pedophelia.

Back in 1913 the United States of America witnessed a rather grizzly murder trial involving a Jew by the name of Leo M. Frank who was the owner of a sweat shop Pencil Company that employed young girls. Leo M. Frank was also president of the Atlanta, Georgia, Gate City [masonic] Lodge 144 Chapter of B’nai B’rith which had about 500 members. The controversy surrounding his sensational trial and subsequent conviction has been ongoing with the ADL still attempting to exonerate the pedophile sex killer as late as 1986.

I highly suggest that readers take a look at the website which exposes all the machinations surrounding this historic trial. It can be found at the following url: http://www.leofrank.org/introduction-to-leo-frank/

I believe these two examples given in this essay are reason enough to challenge Crown Council Jennifer Johnston’s erroneous assertions that she is putting forth in court which suggest that my work and the information contained on RadicalPress.com are somehow related to pedophilia and child pornography when the facts suggest that those who were involved in laying the complaint against me are the ones who ought to be ashamed and embarrassed by the ongoing behaviour of their own members in this highly suspect and shady Jewish lobby organization that is aggressively pursuing its agenda of supporting these so-called “Hate Crimes” in order to silence any criticism of themselves or of the state of Israel and its ideology of Zionism.

I’m sure there will be more to report on this issue as the trial unfolds.

—–

Filed Under: Abe Foxman, Abrams/B'nai Brith Canada v. Arthur Topham and RadicalP, ADL, Alternative Media, Anti-Defamation League (ADL), B'nai Brith, B'nai Brith Canada, B'nai Brith International, BC HATE CRIME TEAM, Bill Surkis, Canadian Human Rights Act, Canadian Human Rights Commission, Canadian Human Rights Tribunal, Canadian Identity/Sovereignty, Canadian Jewish Congress, Canadian Jewish Defense League, Canadian Judicial System, Charter of Rights & Freedoms, Child Pornography, Cst Normandie Levas BC HATE CRIME TEAM, Det-Cst Terry Wilson BC HATE CRIME TEAM, Douglas H. Christie, Editor's Zone, Free Speech, Free Speech on the Internet, Freedom of Expression, Freedom of Speech, Harry Abrams, Hate Crime laws, Highway of Tears, Holocaust Memorial Museum, Internet Freedom, Jewish Defense League (JDL), Jewish Freemasons, Jewish Lobby Groups, Jewish Media Monopoly, Jewish Porn Industry, Jewish Supremacism, Judge Morgan, Leo M. Frank, Political Prisoners, Political Zionism, Quesnel BC, Quesnel Court House, Quesnel RCMP, Radical Press, RadicalPress.com, RCMP Corruption, Regina, Richard Warman, Rothschild Banking syndicate, Rothschild Zionist Criminal Cartel, Rothschilds, Sec. 319(2) CC "Willful Promotion of Hatred", Section 13/CHR Act, Steven Slimovich, Supreme Court of Canada, The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, World Jewry, World Zionist Organization

Radical Press Legal Update #6

December 14, 2012 by admin 1 Comment

Dear Supporters of a Free Internet and Freedom of Speech,

Please bear with me as this update will be a bit longer than normal but I think highly informative as well.

It’s been two weeks since I last gave an update on my court case involving B’nai Brith Canada (aka Regina) versus Arthur Topham and RadicalPress.com, a pivotal, precedent-setting legal case that will ultimately determine whether Canada will succumb to the likes of all those other so-called “democratic” countries like Germany, France, Spain, Australia, etc. who have been co-opted by the Rothschild criminal cartel and now have their freedom of speech curtailed by “HATE CRIME” laws that don’t permit any questioning of either the rogue and racist state of Israel or any other aspect of the Zionist Jew agenda to turn the world into a giant gulag ruled over by the Star of David.

To say the least this session was particularly crazy in a number of ways.

First off we awoke in the early morning to find ourselves in the midst of a major snow storm! That meant getting the driveway cleared so we could get into town to attend court and as there was no time for me to shovel the 300 foot swath to the Barkerville Hwy we had to call the neighbour and get him to come over with his snow-clearing machine.

Meanwhile I tried to call my lawyer Doug Christie to check on things but I was unable to reach him on his cell phone. The court time for the bail hearing was set for 1:30 p.m. I called the local airport to see if Doug’s flight was still on schedule only to find that it wasn’t happening. As it turned out the plane made it from Vancouver International airport as far as Williams Lake (the next city about 90 km south of Quesnel), circled for awhile and then due to poor visibility was forced to return to Vancouver.

Realizing this of course created a number of questions in terms of what might occur when we got to the courthouse in Quesnel.

Upon reaching town over roads that were in dire need of plowing we went into the government building where the courts are located around 1 p.m. only to find the place basically empty with the exception of some supporters who had come to view the session. I went upstairs to the court registry to see what was up and was told that it wouldn’t be happening until 2 p.m. and that Mr. Christie would be appearing via telephone instead of in person. I knew right then that we would be encountering some difficulties as my lawyer and I had already discussed the importance of him being there in the flesh in the courtroom due to the strident actions of Crown council during the last session on November 30th.

Having a few minutes to kill, my wife and I went for a quick bite before the court resumed.

There are normally a number of different cases on the docket during the afternoon but on this day my case was the only one so the gallery was empty except for one mysterious elderly woman who was in attendance. She was probably in her mid to late 70?s and appeared to be following my wife and I around as we awaited the opening of the doors leading into the court room. My immediate impression was that she was a local sayanim (Isreali supporter and operative) sent out by B’nai Brith to observe the session.

Crown council Jennifer Johnston was there raring to go as usual with her mountains of files and folders stacked up on the table below the Judge’s bench. While we sat quietly awaiting the Judge’s entrance into the room CC Johnston added a new prop to her planned submission to the Judge by setting up an additional little podium on the table that looked a bit like a soap box or a preacher’s pulpit where I assumed she would be placing her papers and her Criminal Code book as she commenced her flamboyant actions against me on behalf of Rothschild’s front organization B’nai Brith Canada.

Judge Morgan, the Judge who has been sitting in on this charade for the majority of the sessions of late, came in and court immediately commenced the clerk having already called Mr. Christie on his cell phone a few minutes prior to the Judge appearing.

Crown council Johnston immediately rattled off the case numbers and proceeded to get right into it but the Judge had to soon interrupt her and allow Mr. Christie to state some things regarding the defence’s side of the issue.

During the last session on November 30th Mr. Christie had reiterated, as he has been reiterating for the past 6 months now, that he is STILL awaiting Disclosure from the Crown. What that means for those unfamiliar with court room procedure is that he has not received from the Crown the documents which state what exactly it is that I am being charged with, what the sentencing is that the Crown is asking and what the contents or evidence is that the Crown is planning to use in their offensive efforts to convict me of this spurious “HATE CRIME” also known as sec. 319(2) of the Criminal Code of Canada. This procedure of furnishing the defence with the Disclosure is standard practise in all litigation yet the Crown has been stalling and stalling and back-pedalling on the issue since I was first arrested on May 16th, 2012.

During the November 30th session Judge Morgan had asked Crown council to get the Disclosure documents to Mr. Christie by no later a date than December 11th, 2012 so that he would have (a very limited amount of) time to study the charges and prepare to address the proposed arguments of Crown as they pertained to the bail conditions which CC Johnston is hell-bent on imposing upon me. Well, as usual, this again didn’t happen and instead Mr. Christie got word at the last minute that instead of receiving the required information Crown council was now making an additional Application to the Judge wherein the Crown would be attempting to restrict Mr. Christie from divulging the contents of the Disclosure to his client, me!

Why you might reasonably ask? Allow me to explain. When the formal charge was handed down on November 5th, 2012 the Zionist controlled media in Canada were on it like a dog on a bone and all the major print media and Canada’s largest TV media, SunNews Network, were spreading their excremental slurs and the usual vilifying statements about me and my website around the country. In the case of the National Post aka the Zionist National Post as I prefer to call it, their intrepid reporter Stewart Bell had published some quotes from a document which another website, FreeDominion.ca had published on a thread on their forum. The quotes in question were extracts taken from what is called a “Warned Statement”. Allow me to explain what that is.

Prior to Det – Cst Terry Wilson of the BC HATE CRIME TEAM (the Zionist created police hit squad that orchestrated my arrest and that also works in tandem with Richard Warman and Harry Abrams of B’nai Brith Canada – the two Zionist B’nai Brith agents who filed the sec. 319(2) charge against me) releasing me from jail on May 16, 2012 he and I went to a small interview room where he “interviewed” me in order to solicit further “evidence” to be used against me. I ought to have listened to my lawyer and told Wilson to stuff his interview up where the sun doesn’t shine but of course I didn’t and decided to humour him and gave him some facts to counter all the bullshit that he was spewing forth during our talk; bs that was pure Zionist disinformation most likely planted in Wilson lightning struck brain by Richard Warman and Harry Abrams after decades of conspired with Warman back in Ontario (more on that in a subsequent post).

Anyhow, Wilson went back to his office in Surrey with his digital recording device in hand and proceeded over the next couple of months to transcribe it into text. Eventually (this is still not clear yet) he disclosed it to my lawyer Mr. Christie who, in turn, sent me a copy and unbeknownst to myself I didn’t realize that the document was confidential. Given that Crown Council has yet to disclose anything else it begs the question as to why Wilson would have given this document to Mr. Christie in the first place. After I read it through I sent it to the owner of the FreeDominion.ca website Connie Fournier in a private email to discuss some relevant issues to do with Det. Wilson in order to help me in my defence against these trumped up charges. My reason for doing this was quite simple. Richard Warman has been filing charges against Connie and Mark Fournier for a number of years now and dragging them through court appearance after court appearance in order to stop them from publishing information related to his outrageous behaviour with respect to in the ongoing battle over the infamous sec. 13(1) provision in the Canadian Human Rights Act that’s been taking place on the web for a number of years now. Warman is Canada’s #1 serial complainer working for B’nai Brith Canada and any other Jewish lobby group in the country always ready and willing to charge critics of Israel with “hate crime” offences and tie them up in endless litigation and then having obtained a conviction he reaps the financial rewards that come with the victim having to pay outrageous fines. Being a lawyer himself and having worked for the Canadian Human Rights Commission for a number of years Warman’s reputation for infiltrating websites and forums using false aliases in order to post “hateful” and “racist” comments and then turning around and charging the website owner with a sec. 13(1) “hate crime” complaint are well documented and known internationally. It’s all part of an ongoing program initiated by B’nai Brith International to censor the Internet via the creation and implantation of “hate crime” legislation in the law books of unsuspecting democracies.

Well, as it turns out our sleuth Det Wilson has been collaborating with this same serial sidewinder Warman for years now pulling off on others precisely what they pulled off in my case, that is, coming up with some phoney “evidence” furnished to them by B’nai Brith Canada via Harry Abrams their BC sayanim agent and then arresting the person and stealing their computers and copying all the information off of their hard drive and subsequently using the Canadian court system and the Zionist controlled media to first vilify the person and afterwards strive to find them guilty in the “human rights” tribunals (modelled on the Stalinist show trials of the 1930?s) of “spreading ‘hatred’ toward Jews and citizens of Israel”. Once those steps have been taken they then proceed to fine the shit out of their victim and order them to take down their websites and also issue cease and desist orders preventing the victim from publishing any further truth about B’nai Brith’s sinister actions. Warman of course greedily collects his blood money, pockets it and then proceeds to look for another website to sucker in to his hate crime scam. This has been the modus operandi of the Jewish lobby groups here in Canada for decades and began as soon as they were able to surreptitiously configure their “hate crime” legislation into Canada’s statutes via their sayanim Jewish Supreme Court Justices (Irwin Cotler being the primary Zionist agent and former Liberal Attorney General of Canada) and all the rest of their pro-Zionist lawyers and sycophants working on “commissions” and behind the scenes.

Anyhow, getting back to the scene of the crime de jure and what happened as a result of Connie Fournier( also unaware of its confidential status), posting this document on her website in the form of a pdf. Crown council Jennifer Johnston is now attempting to use that as an argument against my lawyer and an excuse for her holding back on sending Mr. Christie the long awaited disclosure and second to file an additional Application to stop Mr. Christie from sharing any additional information regarding the Crown’s charges with me, the accused.

Then, to add insult to injury, she held up documents before the Judge saying that she did have the necessary information sitting on her computer just waiting (at the click of a button as she remarked) to send to Mr. Christie but of course she had to have the new Application approved beforehand so she could sleep at night knowing that Mr. Topham wouldn’t be privy to it and go and post it on someone’s website!

Some of course might think it lame and some lame-brained on her part to expect that Mr. Christie be subjected to such an outrageous set of conditions given the fact that the Crown itself hasn’t disclosed a damn bit of information from the get go! But given all the antics on the part of CC Johnston thus far in this little mini-series nothing that she attempts comes as too great a surprise. Mr. Christie of course outright rejected Crown’s claims and also argued that there were mitigating circumstances regarding the “Warned Statement” that needed to be addressed when he could be in court in person.

Mr. Christie then asked the Judge to set another date for these matters to argued as obviously Crown was making it supremely difficult for him to do anything without first receiving disclosure.

Then something occurred which bears mentioning as it’s not the first time that Crown council Johnston has pulled this stunt. When she began stating to the Judge that the Crown needed to get additional bail conditions imposed on me asap she held up in her hand a booklet that Wilson had prepared of all the posts I had placed on my website since November 2, 2012 when I first learned that I was able to do so legally. I gather it is one of his prime sources of entertainment an a justification for his otherwise unearned pay cheque when he’s not busy snooping about in all my private emails that he stole from me back in May. One could see that to to her way of thinking she had in hand all the solid evidence needed to prove that I was continuing to publish “willful hatred” toward Jews and Zionists and that because of all these posts (up to at least November 30) it was imperative that I be restricted from using my website and posting my articles, news reports, other articles, political cartoons and unrelated stories.

This business of trying to misinform the Judge while at the same time intimidate me into somehow feeling guilty for doing what I’ve been doing for the past fourteen years of publishing is as pathetic as it is laughable. She still hasn’t twigged on the fact that I run an alternative News Service and that posting articles is what one does when providing such a venue for readers. It’s as if I’m supposed to hang my head in shame because these Zionist psychopaths have alleged that I’m a hate mongering anti-Semite and tuck my tail between my legs and slink off into the underbrush somewhere to await my conviction! My God! Is the degree of intelligence that our legal beagles are functioning at? If so, heaven help the nation.

It was then that Judge Morgan began to repeat early statements and false accusations by Crown council Johnston (in her zeal to convince the Judge of the dastardly deeds I supposedly was committing), that what I was writing and publishing might be comparable to a website that was publishing child pornography and therefore had to be stopped as soon as possible. Child pornography!!! I couldn’t at that point help but groan and Mr. Christie was quick to rebut such statements stating to Judge Morgan that this was an unfair and inapplicable comparison. (Again, I will address this issue further in a separate article). The Judge listened to Mr. Christie’s argument and tended to agree although Crown council Johnston must have got a chuckle out of having influenced him to the point where he was beginning to regurgitate the same standard Zionist double-talk and lies that CC Johnston was attempting to use.

Given all the disjointed and conflicting accusations and misinformation that were colliding in the court room Judge Morgan suggested that court adjourn for half an hour so that Crown and Defence could speak privately and try to come to some agreement over the contentious issues at hand and also so Mr. Christie could speak with me as well. This was around 2:30 p.m. We took a half hour break and returned to the court room at 3:00 p.m.

There was no possibility of Mr. Christie agreeing to anything that Crown council Johnston was proposing and so when court resumed Mr. Christie and Crown council Johnston along with Judge Morgan began to look at future dates where Mr. Christie could be in court to argue the case. A date of Wednesday, December 19, 2012 at 1:30 p.m. was agreed upon by all parties and Judge Morgan then ended the session.

Stay tuned folks! It can only get more interesting as this 2012 freedom of speech farce continues to unfold.

—–

NOTE: Again I would ask of readers that they try to assist me financially in my battle with the censors by sending donations to the cause. Due to the fact that the Crown is refusing to give the required disclosure to my lawyer I am not able to furnish legal aid with the required documents that they demand before looking at whether or not I might qualify for legal financial assistance. This leaves me in the unenviable position of having to rely solely upon donations to pay for my legal expenses and while I have been receiving some assistance from a few kind souls who realize the importance of this case to all Canadians the amount of money thus sent comes nowhere near that necessary to pay for my lawyer to appear in court in Quesnel to defend me against these false charges.

As such I would once again implore readers to give serious consideration to helping me out by either sending a donation via PayPal using either a PayPal account or a credit card or else sending a cheque or Money Order to me via snail mail at the following postal address. Cash of course also works.

Arthur Topham
4633 Barkerville Highway
Quesnel, B.C.
Canada
V2J 6T8

Sincerely,

Arthur Topham
Pub/Ed
The Radical Press

Filed Under: "hate speech", Abrams/BBC v. Arthur Topham & RadicalPress.com, Alternative Media, Anti-Defamation League (ADL), Arthur Topham - Editor & Publisher, B'nai Brith Canada, B'nai Brith International, Babylonian Talmud, BC HATE CRIME TEAM, Canadian Association for Free Expression (CAFE), Canadian Charter of Rights & Freedoms, Canadian Council for Israel and Jewish Advocacy (CIJA), Canadian Free Speech League, Canadian Human Rights Act, Canadian Human Rights Commission, Canadian Human Rights Tribunal, Canadian Identity/Sovereignty, Canadian Jewish Congress, Canadian Jewish Defense League, Canadian Judicial System, CC Johnston, Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Connie Fournier, Crown Council Jennifer Johnston, Cst Normandie Levas BC HATE CRIME TEAM, Det-Cst Terry Wilson BC HATE CRIME TEAM, Douglas H. Christie, Editor's Zone, Ernst Zundel, Ezra Levant, Fredrick Toben, Free Speech on the Internet, Freedom of Expression, Freedom of Speech, FreeDominion.ca, FreeDominion.com.pa, Harry Abrams, Hate Crime laws, Internet Freedom, Irwin Cotler, Israeli Terrorism, Israeli War Crimes, Jewish Defense League (JDL), Jewish Freemasons, Jewish Holocaust Industry, Jewish Lobby Groups, Jewish Media Monopoly, Jewish Porn Industry, Jewish Racism, Jewish Supremacism, Jewish Terrorists, Judge Morgan, League for Human Rights of B'nai Brith Canada, National(Zionist)Post, PM Stephen Harper, Political Prisoners, Political Zionism, Quesnel Court House, Quesnel RCMP, Radical Press, RadicalPress.com, RCMP Corruption, Richard Warman, Rothschild, Rothschild Banking syndicate, Rothschild Zionist Criminal Cartel, Sec. 319(2) CC "Willful Promotion of Hatred", Section 13/CHR Act, Statement of Particulars, SunTV News Network, Supreme Court of Canada, The Controversy of Zion, The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, The Radical Press, Ukrainian Holocaust, World Zionist Organization, Zionism, Zionist Atrocities, Zionist Jews in Russia

Spingola/ZionCrimeFactory Interview: Discussions on ZFC’s New Book, Zionism & Arthur Topham

December 7, 2012 by admin Leave a Comment

Click HERE to listen to Interview

[Editor's Note: On behalf of RadicalPress.com I would like to take this opportunity to express my most sincere thanks to both Deanna Spingola and her Guest Zander C. Fuerza of ZionistCrimeFactory.com for adding my legal case with B'nai Brith Canada to their discussions on the Jewish Supremacist agenda for global destruction and world slavery.

Zander is an erudite speaker and dedicated researcher who is in the final stages of completing a book dealing with the very issues discussed in this interesting interview.

The fact that he has dedicated so much of the discussion to my battle with the Jewish lobbyists and their censorship plans for Canada is a genuine indication that the issue of Freedom of Speech on the Internet is one that spans borders and is as vital a concern to citizens of the USA as well as Canada.

Please pass this interview on to other concerned citizens everywhere.]

———-

Hello,

I interviewed Zander C. Fuerza (ZCF) today, December 6, 2012. You may hear this interview by visiting this web site:

http://www.spingola.com/SpingolaSpecials.html

Thanks for your interest in my programs.

Kindest Regards,

Deanna

My radio program: Monday-Friday, 11 am to 1 pm (CT)

www.republicbroadcasting.org

My radio schedule: http://www.spingola.com/radio_schedule.html

Spingola Specials - commercial-free interviews

My Books:

The Ruling Elite, a Study in Imperialism, Genocide and Emancipation

The Ruling Elite, the Zionist Seizure of World Power

(both available at Amazon, www.spingola.com and other retailers)

Filed Under: "hate speech", "Jewish" holocaust, 'Al Qaeda', 'state' of Israel, 9/11 Truth, Abe Foxman, Abrams/BBC v. Arthur Topham & RadicalPress.com, Adolf Hitler, Anti-Defamation League (ADL), anti-Semitism, Anti-ZionistCanada Yahoo Group, Arthur Topham, Auschwitz-Birkenau, B'nai Brith Canada, B'nai Brith International, Babylonian Talmud, BC HATE CRIME TEAM, Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Canadian Council for Israel and Jewish Advocacy (CIJA), Canadian Free Speech League, Canadian Jewish Congress, Canadian Jewish Defense League, Canadian Judicial System, CC Johnston, Charter of Rights & Freedoms, Cst Normandie Levas BC HATE CRIME TEAM, David Duke, Deir Yassin massacre, Det-Cst Terry Wilson BC HATE CRIME TEAM, Douglas H. Christie, Dr. Fredrick Toben, Editor's Zone, Ezra Levant, Freedom of Speech, Gas Chambers, Gaza, Gentiles, German POWs, Germany Must Perish!, Harold Wallace Rosenthal, Harry Abrams, Hate laws, Highway of Tears, Internet Freedom, Israel, Israeli Terrorism, Israeli War Crimes, Jewish Banking Cartel, Jewish Censorship, Jewish Crime, Jewish Hatred, Jewish Holocaust Industry, Jewish Holocaust Lie, Jewish lobbyists, Jewish Media Monopoly, Jewish Racism, Jewish Supremacism, Jewish Terrorists, Jim Townsend, Judge Morgan, League for Human Rights of B'nai Brith Canada, Mainstream Mindcontrol Media (M3), Missing Women Commission of Inquiry, Morgenthau Plan, Mossad, National(Zionist)Post, Pharisaic Judaism, Pharisees, Political Prisoners, Political Zionism, Prothink, Rabbi Stephen Wise, RadicalPress.com, RCMP Corruption, Richard Warman, Rothschild Zionist Criminal Cartel, Sec. 319(2) CC "Willful Promotion of Hatred", SunTV News Network, The Controversy of Zion, The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, The Source, Twin Towers/911, Ukrainian Holocaust, World Jewry, World Zionist Organization, Zion Crime Factory, Zionism, Zionist Atrocities

News Release: David Lindsay jailed by Kamloops Criminal Justices!

December 2, 2012 by admin 1 Comment

Dear Freedom Lovers,

“Liberty cannot be guaranteed by law. Nor by anything else except the resolution of free citizens to defend their liberties.” ~ Edward Abbey, A Voice Crying in the Wilderness

I just recently received the following email from Dave Lindsay one of Canada’s foremost authorities on the massive income tax scam that the federal government, in conjunction with the City of London, has been bludgeoning Canadians with since WW1. Dave’s letter will once again magnify the grotesque nature of Canada’s “justice” system. It’s gotten way outta hand folks to the point where the corruption is becoming so blatant as to defy both logic and decency. One day it’s Jim Townsend being framed by the cops and sent to jail for 6 months on bogus charges then it’s me being arrested on more bullshit allegations and now Dave is once again tossed into a totalitarian dungeon for political reasons.

Please pass this on to others. Canada has to get with the program and take back this nation from the traitors who’ve usurped the power of the people and placed it into the hands of Zionist Jew sycophants like Stephen Harper. Enough is freakin’ ENOUGH!

——————-

David’s email:

Hi to everyone, to begin please do not respond to this email as I am currently and unlawfully being held in custody at the Kamloops Correctional centre.

On Thursday, Nov 29 I appeared for sentencing on the second charge, this time of failing to comply with a court order to file income tax returns. The judge, Judge DeWalle as expected ignored all my sentencing submissions.

It was clear from the beginning when I showed up at court and there were 3 sheriffs in the court room with black gloves on that the judge had already made up his mind before even hearing me that he was going to send me to jail and he had already ordered the sheriffs that this was to happen. Thus, my sentencing submissions meant nothing from the beginning as the issue was already decided before I entered the court.

I had insisted that there should be no jail, the crown suggested 60 days. I provided the judge with over 50 cases showing that on first offence the maximum penalty given was $1000 fine. However, in the first trial the provincial court tried to sentence me for 5 months, the appeal court shortened this to 30 days, even though at that time I had also provided the court with over 40 cases showing that jail is not an option on the first offence therefore because the court made that error the first time this court should not increase it but should keep it as a fine or 15 days or less.

I also provided him with 9 pieces where people had been charged the second time with failing to comply with a court order to file income tax returns, one person got 21 days in jail on 23 counts, all the rest were fines only. I told the judge that my case was no different than these.

He disagreed relying on what the appeal court said in the first case, claiming with no evidence to support it that I was leader of either the Freedom movement or tax honesty movement. As a result Judge DeWalle imposed a harsher penalty specifically due to my political beliefs, and my Christian religious beliefs which outlines in great detail at the sentencing hearing that formed the basis of my inability to file income taxes.

I also instructed the judge to the fundamental and constitutional principles to our law as admitted to by the most respected English judges in history including Blackstone, Coke, Broom, and Halsbury who all admitted that our constitution allows me and everyone else to refuse to comply with statutes that violate the principles of Christian law set out in the Bible.

I had attempted to apply to the Supreme court of BC, for release pending appeal however, the court refused to accept my application because an order exists from 6 years ago given in my absence, declaring that I was vexatious and that I was required to get leave ‘permission’ from the court before they would accept my application.

Despite the fact that I have never had any action instituted by me declared to be vexatious at any time and despite the fact that the court of appeal upheld in my position that this order does not apply in criminal or penal matters, the supreme court still refuses to accept my application of release pending appeal.

Also, this ignores the well known principle that the provincial legislation permits this type of order to be issued, cannot override federal statutes including the Criminal code, which directly states that I am entitled by law to a right of appeal and to apply for release pending appeal, also as of right. Consequently, I have no remedy to get released, as the court refuses to uphold my rights. I am now going to spend the next 60 days less 1/3 rd time, in jail and will not get out until first week in January.

I appreciate all the support from everyone across Canada and wish everyone to know that the judges in BC have decided that they will not rule on the issue of whether the income tax act violates the Coronation Oath Act which is part of our constitution.

I will send out another email thru a third party friend in about a week and want everyone to know that this jail sentence has not diminished my resolve to expose the unlawful usury banking system and supporting tax structures and will continue to do so with all resolve beginning once again in the Spring upon my release.

Thank-you again for your support and please remember that I cannot respond to any emails until January.

——-

Filed Under: Canadian Charter of Rights & Freedoms, Canadian Judicial System, David Lindsay, Income Tax scam, Judge DeWalle, Kamloops Correctional Center

Zionist Terror Tactics – a political cartoon from RadicalPress.com

December 2, 2012 by admin Leave a Comment

Filed Under: "hate speech", Abe Foxman, Abrams/B'nai Brith Canada v. Arthur Topham and RadicalP, Anti-Defamation League (ADL), anti-Semitism, Anti-Zionist Canada, Ashkenazi Jews, B'nai Brith Canada, B.C. Politics, B.C. Supreme Court, Babylonian Talmud, BC HATE CRIME TEAM, Bosheviks, Canadian Charter of Rights & Freedoms, Canadian Identity/Sovereignty, Canadian Jewish Congress, Canadian Jewish Defense League, Canadian Judicial System, Canadian traitors, Cheka, Christian Zionists, Crown Council Jennifer Johnston, Cst Normandie Levas BC HATE CRIME TEAM, Det-Cst Terry Wilson BC HATE CRIME TEAM, Ezra Levant, Freedom of Expression, Freedom of Speech, Freedom of Thought, Gaza, George Orwell, Harry Abrams, Hate Crime laws, Honourable Justice Morgan, Irwin Cotler, Israel, Jewish Banking Cartel, Jewish Censorship, Jewish Crime, Jewish Defense League (JDL), Jewish Hatred, Jewish Lobby Groups, Jewish Media Monopoly, Jewish Racism, Jewish Supremacism, Jewish Talmudists, Jewish Terrorists, Jews, Josef Stalin, Judeo-Christianity, Karl Marx, KGB, Kol Nidre prayer, Lonnie Landrud, Netfirms.com, Pharisaic Judaism, Pharisees, Political Prisoners, Political Zionism, Quesnel RCMP, RCMP Corruption, Richard Warman, Robert Pickton, Rothschild Banking syndicate, Rothschild Zionist Criminal Cartel, Sec. 319(2) CC "Willful Promotion of Hatred", terrorist Stern Gang, The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, THE ZUNDEL TRIAL & FREE SPEECH, Ukrainian Holocaust, World Jewry, World Zionist Organization, Zach P, Zionist Atrocities, Zionist Jews in Russia

Ashkenazi European Zionist Jews don’t speak for ALL Jews – Shazer Everquar

November 29, 2012 by admin Leave a Comment

http://shazereverquar.wordpress.com/antisemitic/antisemitism-card/

[EDITOR'S NOTE: I received a copy of the following email from Shazer Everquar of Harrison, Arkansas USA yesterday. In his letter to Netfirm.com's corporate axeman Zach P he not only tears a strip off 'Det' Terry Wilson of the 'BC HATE CRIME TEAM' but also includes a very interesting short video that highlights another aspect of the racist, supremacist mindset of those Zionist Jews who control not only Israel but the majority of Western governments via their behind-the-scenes 'advisers' and lobbyists like B'nai Brith Canada.

In further communications with Shazer Everquar I learned a bit more about his side of the story when it comes to America's Zionist attack dog, the ADL or Anti-Defamation League, which is but one more tentacle protruding forth from the main body known as B'nai Brith International which is the creation of the Rothschild criminal cartel now attacking freedom of speech globally through their implanted "hate laws".
Do take the time to watch this video as it illustrates a good point; one that most of us have never contemplated.]
———————-
Dear NetFirms (Zach P),

I am a former customer and once had the site, thinkmasa.org which was hosted by you.

As an African-American, I am particularly outraged at the racist tactics of the bigot known as Det-Cst Terry Wilson. It is a FACT that White Jews are responsible for the Atlantic SLAVE trade and are SO racist that they even call BLACK JEWS “anti-semites!”??

The fact that this so-called “detective” is supporting a PROVEN RACIST PROVOCATION ORGANIZATION reveals that such an “investigation” is highly suspect.

Click the above link and watch for yourself the video which PROVES these guys are quite corrupt.

If White Jews are allowed to attack Black Jews in the name of “anti-semitism” then where will it end ???? Surely a Gentile doesn’t stand a chance under those conditions.??Please be fair and take a good look at ALL the facts.

Thank you.

Sincerely,

Shazer Everquar

Harrison, Arkansas USA
——————————
Further comments from a subsequent communication with Shazer Everquar:

Dear Editor:

I had to write because, as you noticed, that video was tailor-made for your case.

About NetFirms.com: I went with them because I wanted to be hosted outside of the US. But as my email suggests, eventually I moved my blog to another company (Blue Host). Suddenly, I was getting all sorts of tech help that I never got from NetFirms.com. I didn’t realize how lousy they were until I left them.

So what you’re saying about them not responding is just a continuation of the fact that they don’t respond to ANYTHING. They just collect your money.

If you’re not required to host in Canada, consider moving your blog to another country such as the Netherlands or better yet, the Isle of Man. Then the Canadian ADL won’t be able to touch you.

I’m sympathetic to your cause. January 13th, 2012 I was released from over 16 months of incarceration without a trial by Zionist Jews. When I was set free they went through my wallet and took my social security card and my driver’s license.

While I was incarcerated all of my belongings were stolen. I mean ALL. Car, clothes, everything. My best and only friend has been supporting me out of his own pocket for nearly a year because one cannot get a job without ID.

While I was incarcerated, a Zionist judge wrote an order that I was not to have access to the internet “for any purpose”!

I know from personal experience how the Jews terrorize those who oppose their quest for world domination.

I’m writing this to you at a library, which is my only source to the internet. My last blog, “thinkmasa.org” went down while I was incarcerated.

The Zionists taught me that what they hated the most was my blog. So until I’m able to get an ID and raise money, I’m hosted on wordpress.com. If I’m arrested and jailed, the blog stays up.

The Jews blacklisted me and no lawyer would represent me. It was actually a blessing in disguise. I would help you but I don’t know how Canada works. However you can find out and it will be well worth it.

My new blog is not very developed since it’s only been around since June of this year and I’m only able to work on it from libraries, (I.E. a max of 7 hours a day).

I’m amazed to see that most of the so-called anti-zionist websites are actually run by the Zionists. The blatant anti-zionist sites are either run by Jews or racists bankrolled by Jews. It’s very clever actually. You gotta give these monsters credit.

The conscious and unconscious Christian Zionists are the lynchpin. Unseat the Zionist hold on the Christian mentality and the whole house of cards will come tumbling down.

Keep Fighting, we’re winning!

Shazer Everquar

Filed Under: "hate speech", Abe Foxman, Africa, Anti-Defamation League (ADL), anti-Semitism, Anti-ZionistCanada Yahoo Group, Ashkenazi Jews, B'nai Brith Canada, B'nai Brith International, Babylonian Talmud, BC HATE CRIME TEAM, Black America, Black Jews, Canadian Charter of Rights & Freedoms, Canadian Identity/Sovereignty, Canadian Judicial System, Charter of Rights & Freedoms, Christian Zionists, Christianity, Crown Council Jennifer Johnston, Crown of England, Cst Normandie Levas BC HATE CRIME TEAM, Det-Cst Terry Wilson BC HATE CRIME TEAM, Douglas H. Christie, Editor's Zone, Ezra Levant, Freedom of Expression, Freedom of Speech, Gentiles, Harry Abrams, Hasbara, Hate Crime laws, Internet Freedom, Israeli Terrorism, Jewish Anti-Zionists, Jewish Banking Cartel, Jewish Censorship, Jewish Defense League (JDL), Jewish Hatred, Jewish Holocaust Industry, Jewish Holocaust Lie, Jewish lobbyists, Jewish Media Monopoly, Jewish Racism, Jewish Talmudists, Jews, Judeo-Christianity, League for Human Rights of B'nai Brith Canada, Mainstream Mindcontrol Media (M3), Marc Lemire, Netfirms.com, Palestine, Paul Fromm (CAFE), Pharisaic Judaism, Political Prisoners, Political Zionism, Queen of England, Quesnel BC, Quesnel RCMP, RadicalPress.com, RCMP Corruption, Regina, Rothschild Zionist Criminal Cartel, sayanim, Sec. 319(2) CC "Willful Promotion of Hatred", The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, Ukrainian Holocaust, World Zionist Organization, Zach P, Zionism, Zionist Atrocities

Newfoundland Sexual Abuse Victim Byron Prior Continues to be Attacked by Government Agencies and Judicial System

July 26, 2009 by admin

Photobucket
JAMES MARSH – ILLUSTRATOR

Dear Radical Reader,

On March 28th of this year (2009) I received a short email from Byron Prior, an associate out in Newfoundland, who I have been in email contact with for a number of years. His case, as explained in the websites listed in his email below, is most likely one of the best examples of the power of the provincial and federal courts, aided and abetted by a complicit media, to shield themselves and their political cohorts from the scrutiny of public investigation. Byron’s case is a classic, albeit a relatively unknown one, that epitomizes the level of corruption which exists within Canada’s politically biased judicial system and how that system becomes criminal itself in its overt and covert methodologies used to shield the perpetrators of sexual abuse. When people of power are accused of wrongdoing and there is good reason for inquiries to be held then those in such positions exploit their influence for their own self-serving benefit and to the detriment of our justice system as a whole.

Byron Prior’s case, like my own fight with B’nai Brith Canada and the Canadian Human Rights Commission, is purposely kept hidden in the twilight and shadows constructed by the Zionist-controlled mainstream media. Our situations are quite different in terms of the underlying reasons for the persecutions we face but the fact that the system itself is abusing us both is beyond question. In my case the “crime” is speaking the truth as I see it about the Rothschild Zionist global conspiracy. In Byron’s case the circumstances are far beyond anything so threatening as the intellectual attack that I am being subjected to by the state and its Zionist manipulators. His story is a macabre horror story compared to my own, the details of which would provide ample subject matter for a full length documentary. The reaction, by Canada’s legal system, to his noble and sincere efforts to gain both recognition and justice are frightening and ominous.

Please take the time to read through the information provided to me by Byron prior to his capture and afterward by his wife Audrey who is doing her best to bring this story out to the public in the hope that her husband will be treated with respect and dignity.

To be witness to this case is to feel the shame and the infamy of living in a nation thus corrupted. It’s but another stone being rolled back from a tomb containing the dry, dusty bones of a legal system as perverted as those who fill the abusive roles within this sorry and tragedy drama.

On July 24, 2009 I received the following email from Byron’s wife Audrey regarding the latest developments in his ongoing case:

“Byron had court again on Monday, July 20, 2008. They had Dr. Semple from Ontario there to testify in the morning and then in the afternoon the lawyers did their final arguments and then the judge gave his final decision. He went with the report from Dr. Craig here in St. John’s saying that Byron was delusional, rather than the report from 5 doctors from Ontario, and had him committed to the Waterford Mental Hospital where he is to have more assessments done by the board. He is to stay in a locked ward at the Waterford while this is being done. It has to be done within 90 days. He can have visitors, immediate family only, on Thursdays and Sundays from 2:00 to 4:30.

For your info,

Audrey
Wife”

What I found the most disconcerting about Audrey Prior’s message was the fact that the following detailed assessment of Byron’s mental health (see below) was dismissed as irrelevant and instead the blatantly suspect and cursory report by Dr. Craig automatically accepted.

Please pass this on to anyone who might be willing to further assist these folks.

Sincerely,

Arthur Topham
Pub/Ed
RadicalPress.com
——————–

On 3/28/09 3:46 PM, “Byron Prior” wrote to RadicalPress.com:

My family was destroyed as young children by Incest, Child Rape and Abuse of every kind in a small town of 2500 people. Supreme Court Judges, Politicians and RCMP are involved and in a position of “Conflict of Interest” and pay a hooker and her mother to keep quiet in this case in Newfoundland. Their names and why are evident on Harriett’s Customer List at this Website: http://maxpages.com/sexualabuseÃ‚Â &Ã‚Â http:www.youtube.com/cdnjusticedelayed

Before our Premier Danny Williams entered Politics, he and his Law Firm represented me, when he was elected his Firm returned my File and wished me Good Luck finding another Lawyer. No-one in Newfoundland will represent me since and the last Lawyer I asked told me, If any lawyer in Newfoundland represents you, it will be the last job they do in this province. Newfoundland.

Are Canadians Really That Stupid? by Arthur Topham

Paul Fromm on the Demise of Free Speech in Canada by Prof. Kevin MacDonald

The Tyee: Zionist Collaborator and Hate-monger promotes Fear and Smear campaign against Doug Christie

CANADIAN OUTLAWS: Truth, Christians and Free Speech fall prey to Zionist misfeasance by Arthur Topham

Mark Dankof’s America: Interview with Radical Press publisher Arthur Topham Wed. Feb. 27

Radical Press Interview with Mark Glenn on The Ugly Truth BlogRadio Show

Radical Press Legal Update #8

Richard Warman’s ‘Maximum Disruption’ Attacks upon Freedom of Speech in Canada from Marc Lemire at freedomsite.org

Marc Lemire Case: the latest attack on Freedom of Speech by the Canadian Human Rights Commission

Radical Press Legal Update #7

B’nai Brith, ADL, Child Porn, Regina and Arthur Topham by Arthur Topham

Radical Press Legal Update #6

Spingola/ZionCrimeFactory Interview: Discussions on ZFC’s New Book, Zionism & Arthur Topham

News Release: David Lindsay jailed by Kamloops Criminal Justices!

Zionist Terror Tactics – a political cartoon from RadicalPress.com

Ashkenazi European Zionist Jews don’t speak for ALL Jews – Shazer Everquar

Newfoundland Sexual Abuse Victim Byron Prior Continues to be Attacked by Government Agencies and Judicial System

Donate via PayPal

Below Deck

Click to join Anti-Zionist Canada group

Pages

Recent Posts

Blogroll

Archives

Meta