As Above, So Below: B’nai Brith charges Australian Website with anti-Semitic content

Anti-Semitism

[Editor's Note: My goodness those B'nai Brith censors are busy these days! If it's not here in Canada harassing publishers such as RadicalPress.com it's their clone-like clowns "down under" using precisely the same disgusting methodology to shut down free and democratic websites in Australia. It appears the colonies of the once great British Commonwealth are under attack by the Rothschild inspired Zionist Jews.

Again, it's their pathetic cries of discrimination. In this case the farce goes to such lengths that its ridiculousness is beyond question. Imagine, these greedy mind-control freaks already own 99.9% of the world's media with which they spew out their Zionist propaganda on a 24/7 basis year in and century out and yet they have the balls to accuse some alternative news site of not publishing enough pro-Zionist bullshit to suit the likes of their "Anti-Defamation Commission."

It truly is mind-blowing to see the magnitude of their arrogance and self-righteous chauvinism and proves over and over the old maxim that power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely.

So Canada, stand on guard for your diminishing right to freedom of speech. It's under attack big time and it's damn time you woke up to the fact. No greater example of the aphorism: As Above, So Below could be given than what we're witnessing with this incessant and stupid attempt on the part of B'nai Brith International to shut the goyim and the self-hating Jews up.

Read this pathetic article and weep. Then get off your butt and do something about it.]

——————-

B’nai B’rith charges Aussie Web site with anti-Semitic content

Jul. 4, 2009
sarah sechan,

THE JERUSALEM POST

The Australian-based news Web site http://www.newmatilda.com has been charged by the B’nai B’rith Anti-Defamation Commission (ADC) with featuring anti-Israel and anti-Semitic content, particularly during the first three months of 2009, despite claims from the Web site’s editor that it is providing fair coverage.

The ADC issued a report highlighting newmatilda’s Israel coverage, taking issue with the website’s balance of Israeli and Palestinian narratives and the proportion of stories covering the conflict in the region during these months, particularly concerning Gaza.

Contrary to the editor’s claims of providing fair coverage, the report states that 17 out of the 18 articles concerning Operation Cast Lead featured the Palestinian narrative. None of the articles could be characterized as balanced, and one article acknowledged the existence of competing narrative, but argued for the validity of the Palestinian narrative.

Many of the ADC’s concerns regarding newmatilda are rooted in the fact that as a new media source, newmatilda does not need to adhere to journalistic standards of reporting and opinion writing. As the writers are not necessarily trained journalists and their work does not fall under the jurisdiction of a news editor, such standards are not always upheld.

Despite the fact that Australia has laws against racial vilification, the report maintains that it is both more difficult to prosecute violations of these laws in new media sources and that incriminating articles are easier to remove. The report also claims that due to the fact that this information is made available to the general public, holding newmatilda to lower standards of journalistic integrity would be inappropriate.

During the period in which the ADC studied newmatilda, the site provided a disproportionate amount of coverage on Israel. More than one article per week was published on the subject during the first three months of 2009, while only one article addressed the situation in Burma and no articles covered Darfur, North Korea, Zimbabwe, and Tibet, other countries possessing humanitarian-related news.

Newmatilda features Al-Jazeera as its sole newsfeed. In its Frequently Asked Questions section, the site states that as Al-Jazeera has a non-Western focus, it brings balance to the Australian media, as it carries stories that Australians otherwise might not pursue. The ADC maintains that while Al-Jazeera is a legitimate news source, newmatilda offers no alternative sources which would present the other side of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

The issue which the ADC finds most disconcerting is the fact that the Web site maintains very lax control over its comments section, which features responses of a highly anti-Semitic and anti-Israel nature. The comments make a variety of claims, such as denying the Holocaust or claiming that it was exaggerated or “used” by the Jewish people; claiming that Jews have no right or historical attachment to Israel; that anti-Semitism does not exist; that Jews control the media; that Jews are a threat to the world and would infect the world with the plague; and that Israel is supported by “blood money.” While it is likely that some of these comments breach the racial vilification provisions of both the Australian states and Commonwealth, newmatilda rarely deletes them and when it does, it does not do so immediately – granting the comments an extensive readership.

In April, the ADC wrote to newmatilda, expressing concern over the site’s comments page. In response, Marni Cordell, editor of newmatilda, thanked the ADC for providing feedback and wrote “We believe we provide a fair coverage of this important nexus of issues – but we are very committed to publishing informed /opinion/ pieces, and our content reflects that. The possibility that your organization doesn’t share the outlook of the bulk of our contributors – who also differ among themselves – does not make us unfair.”

“If you read opinions on our site that are not commonly found in the major dailies or in publications like the Australian Jewish News, then that is one sign that we are doing our jobs,” Cordell’s response continued.

The ADC states that its primary concern regarding newmatilda is the effect that prejudicial coverage has on the attitude of Australians towards the Jewish people, both in Israel and in the Diaspora.

As there is a documented connection between events in Israel and incidents of local anti-Semitism, the report posits that by hosting comments slandering Israel and Jews on unjust terms, newmatilda’s lax policies undermine the freedom and security of Australian Jews, regardless of whether or not this is the site’s intent.
————

This article can also be read at http://www.jpost.com /servlet/Satellite?cid=1246443716603&pagename=JPArticle%2FShowFull

The Articles of Tyranny by Pastor Eli James

RadlogoMedium
Arthur Topham
Pub/Ed
The Radical Press
Canada’s Radical News Network
4633 Barkerville Hwy
Quesnel, B.C. V2J 6T8
radical@radicalpress.com
http://www.radicalpress.com
“Digging to the root of the issues since 1998”
——————————————————-

Dear Radical Reader,

It’s been awhile since I’ve sent out any of Pastor Eli James’s writings. This article though is one which deserves the utmost attention by anyone concerned about their loss of freedoms whether they’re christian, pagan, atheist, buddhist, muslim, taoist or none of the aforementioned. The message crosses all boundaries and borders and will ring true to anyone who’s been paying attention to global events and the erosion of our cherished rights and freedoms, especially the right to express one’s opinions without fear of the Orwellian thought police busting down your door and hauling you away to some Stalinist Bolshevik “Show Trial.”

Freedom of Speech is the penultimate and quintessential right for without it we become but slaves to the state and to anyone wielding power for control over others.

FreedomofSpeech
Pastor Eli James pulls no punches in his heart-felt effort to alert his fellow Americans to the dangers posed by the Zionist Beast that now stalks the planet in search of more and more victims to feed its frenzied appetite for MORE control of our bodies, minds and spirits. His efforts and words apply just as much to Canada and every other nation of the world that’s been infiltrated and had their Constitutions abducted and usurped by this megalomaniacal psychopathic entity that’s out to fulfill its self-chosen agenda of world domination and one world “international” government.

It’s methods are systematic and once realized as predictable as one’s yearly tax notice or the waxing and waning of the moon. It’s greatest tactic of course is to create FEAR in whatever manner that it can, be it 9/11 or Hiroshima or Dresden or the Gulag Archipelago. Tyranny always has feasted upon fear and used fear to enhance the breadth and scope of its menacing and grasping tentacles. It knows how starved the world is for peace and love and it uses the mentally and spiritually emaciated masses and manipulates them via its news agencies into feeling insecure and afraid, for its then that they are most vulnerable to giving up their rights and freedoms.

The forces of Darkness by any other name still reek to high heaven. They do their utmost to force the faithful of any religion to take up arms against those who worship the one God under a different name. They’ve expended millions if not billions of the people’s money and wealth to create wars where innocents are led to sacrifice their lives for principles that ultimately become meaningless when the wars cease and the only winners are the Zionist elite who’ve fomented and feasted upon them and in the end acquired even greater riches and wealth while the blood of innocents soaks the planet and democracy reels and falters from the death blows dealt to it by the greed of a small number of psychopaths.

Everyone has a right to worship God in their own way. There is only one divine Presence, one divine Cosmos, one divine Purpose and that is LOVE AND PEACE AND BROTHERHOOD AND SISTERHOOD and a reverence for this garden given to us by the ONE CREATOR for the use of ALL.

We need to think about these things and start putting the pieces of the puzzle together. Pastor Eli James has done just that with his expose of the Zionist cartel that’s now ruling the world via subterfuge and ill-gained power and wealth.

Without these three cherished Freedoms it’s highly unlikely that we will ever, as a race of human beings, achieve the fourth freedom which Norman Rockwell illustrated so beautifully and aptly in the illustrations that I’m using. The last freedom is freedom from want. Freedom from having to live on the streets, homeless and starving and existing hand to mouth because of a few power-crazed groups who want to rule the resources of the world. Freedom to feed our children and our families and enjoy the fruits of this holy garden we call the Earth Mother.


Like the four directions of the native American spiritual teachers these four freedoms are the pillars that hold up the temple of LIFE. They are now threatened by an alien force. It has to be first recognized and then resisted and stopped. God willing that will happen with the courage and conviction of all who value these four noble truths.

Please pass this article to everyone you can. The fate of freedom depends on each and every one of us doing something to ensure it carries on to our children and grandchildren.

Shine your Light for Love & Peace & Justice for All,

Arthur Topham
Pub/Ed
The Radical Press
——————————————————-

The Articles of Tyranny

by Pastor Eli James

Church of the Restoration of True Israel
http://www.anglo-saxonisrael.com/

See also:

http://www.christogenos.com
http://www.skipbaker.com
http://www.prothink.com

“In my distress I cried unto Yahweh, and He heard me. Deliver my soul, O Yahweh, from lying lips and a deceitful tongue. What shall be given unto thee, or what shall be done unto thee, thou false tongue? Sharp arrows of the mighty, with coals of juniper. Woe is me, that I sojourn in Mesech, that I dwell in the tents of Kedar! My soul hath long dwelt with him that hateth peace. I am for peace: but when I speak, they are for war.” (Psalm 120)

“Beware the leaven of the Pharisees, which is hypocrisy.” (Luke 12:1)

Introduction

This essay is about lying tongues that hate peace. May our Father, Yahweh, grant to His Children, Israel (not to be confused with the Jews), the Great Awakening, which will open their eyes to truth that will set them free.

[Read more...]

Concerns of a Canadian by Grenville Rogers

Harper&Jews&Minorah

The real political advisers who are directing MP Harper’s Con-serve-Israel government
_________________________________________________________________________

[Editor's Note: Mr. Rogers is an octogenarian with the political perspicacity of a wise Elder.

There was a time when cultures respected the words of their Elders as is still traditionally so in Native American circles.

Maybe it's time we once again began paying homage to those who have the courage to speak out in defense of their country when even to do so is deemed to be politically incorrect by some.

I, for one, hold Grenville's advice in the deepest of respect and admiration and thus would admonish other Canadians who believe in their country and its prized possessions of freedom of speech and political and spiritual sovereignty to do as he has done. Speak out! Voice your opinions without fear and with conviction and sincerity and the knowledge that what you are doing WILL have a positive effect upon others. If we are to ever regain our footings as an independent and free country and repossess our respect and our integrity then we MUST face our enemies who, from within, are hell-bent on destroying all that Canada once was that made her great and glorious.

Please pass this vitally important letter on to as many concerned Canadians as you can think of.]

————-

Mr. Irving R. Gerstein, CFO
Conservative Party of Canada Fundraiser
Irving R GERSTEIN
irving_gerstein@conservativefund.ca

Dear Mr Gerstein:

Mr. Gerstein, I am very concerned about the future of my country, and the direction in which our current Prime Minister is forcing us to go.

In good conscience, I cannot, and therefore will not longer support a party or government that does not act in the best interests of Canada and Canadians, a government which supports terrorism, as does the CPC under its present leader.  The party and its leader practice deceit and hypocrisy, and act in secrecy. I am convinced that not one single Canadian really trusts this leader or government, or Mr. Ignatieff or Mr. Layton. Integrity, at every level, is conspicuous by its complete and utter absence.

Mr. Harper has proven to be a dictator, not a leader of a democracy, which Canada pretends to be. Canada was, at one time in the distant past, close to being a democracy.  Canada has never been a democracy.

Canada is defintely not the “Free and Democratic” country that our erstwhile leader(s) trumpet it to be. We certainly do not have “Freedom of Expression for all” and we are demonstrably not democratic. Canadians live under the most powerful dictatorship in the world. Canada’s PM Harper has placed Canada in the deadly vortex of the doomed “USS Titanic”. He will not be a captain that goes down with his ship. Mr. Harper also has clearly demonstrated that he now worships at the Trinitarian Synagogue (Israel, Judaism, Zionism)., the central dogma of which is the gospel of a sacred holocaust.

Jew'sHarpr1

Do you get that strange feeling of being surrounded by foreign interest groups?
__________________________________________________________________________

 

The leader and party have declared support for a particular religion, Judaism, over all other religions. This is odious, especially in light of the supremacist teachings of the most holy book of Judaism, the Babylonian Talmud.

PM Harper, as does each puppet US President, takes his cue and orders from the Israel Lobby.

President Ariel Sharon was very blunt, straightforward and truthful, when, on 3 October 2001, he told Mr. Shimon Peres, as reported on Kol Yisrael radio, that “We, the Jewish people, control America, and the Americans know it.”

Mr. Sharon’s complete statement to Mr. Shimon Peres is: “Every time we do something, you tell me America will do this and will do that … I want to tell you something very clear: Don’t worry about American pressure on Israel.  We, the Jewish people, control America, and the Americans know it.”

Menachim Begin, Former Prime Minister of Israel, declared:

“Our race is the Master Race.
We are divine Gods on this planet.
We are as different from the inferior races as they are from insects.
Compared to our race, other races are beasts and animals, cattle at best.
Other races are considered as human excrement.
Our destiny is to rule over the inferior races.
Our earthly kingdom will be ruled by our leader with a rod of iron.
The masses will lick our feet, and serve us as our slaves.”

I find these statements most disturbing, especially in light of PM Harper’s total commitment to Israel and to the defense of Judaism.  Perhaps you are similarly concerned.

HarpMinorah

B’nia Brith International – secret society of Zionists hiding
behind Canada’s infamous Section 13(1) gag laws

___________________________________________________________________
Mr. Harper is the most dangerous PM that Canada has ever had. Deceitfully following in the footsteps of his predecessors as regards the NAU (North American Union). He professes to be an economist, yet has no idea of, let alone intention of using the Bank of Canada to finance true infrastructure, and the maintenance of existing true infrastructure.

He, all by his dictatorial self, commits billions of the taxpayers’ hard-earned dollars to military equipment and foreign policy misadventures. But he never tells Canadians where that money comes from. He is mortgaging our great-grandchildren’s lives. He could and should, but will not use the BOC (Bank of Canada) for true infrastructure  projects that benefit Canada and Canadians.

Please convey these concerns and the warnings implicit in them, to PM Harper. Thank you.

Respectfully,

Grenville Rogers
grogers@vianet.ca

Response to: The $100,000 anti-Jewish teenage graffiti hate crusade. Or not by Laura Rosen Cohen

Photobucket

[Editor's Note: The following letter to Ms. Cohen is in response to her article of May 19th, 2009 in the National Post. (Please see bottom of this page for the url and the story.)

It's a good start both for her and for the Zionist-controlled National Post. While there's no good reason to be hopeful that either of them are serious about initiating any form of open debate on either Zionism or the domestic and foreign policies of the state of Israel, Ms. Cohen's critique of the Canadian Jewish Congress and B'nai Brith Canada does cut to the quick and on the surface at least exposes the growing dichotomy that appears to exist between these pro-Zionist lobbyists and the remainder of Canada's Jewish population. For whatever reasons  Jews like Ms. Cohen are speaking out finally and stating their dissatisfaction with the manner in which these pressure groups attempt to speak for all Jews while at the same time they use their inordinate and powerful influence to censor the rest of Canadians whose views they deem inimical to their own interests.

Ms. Cohen's revelations regarding the Harper government's blatant patronage toward orgs like the CJC are also quite revealing, especially I would imagine, for the majority of grassroots Conservative supporters who voted unanimously back in 2008 to rid this country of Section 13(1) of the CHR Act and strip the CHR Commission of its powers to censor free speech and the Internet.]

—————–

May 21, 2009
Dear Ms. Cohen,

I’m sure that by now you are sufficiently swamped with a backlog of responses to your challenging and impenitent critique of Canada’s foremost players in the censorship game but nonetheless I must add my comments as well.

As one non-Jewish Canadian who is being directly impacted by B’nai Brith Canada due to a Sec. 13(1) complaint launched against myself and my website http://www.radicalpress.com by this foreign lobbyist group, see http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=821 CHRC Complaint Against RadicalPress.com from Harry Abrams and B’nai Brith Canada, November 20, 2007, I can honestly say that your concerns about their methods of addressing issues of “hate” and “anti-Semitism,” etc. are both welcome and sorely needed.

For the most part I can only concur with your assessment of CJC and BBC although I would call you on one point in your article where you tend to tow the same party line as these Zionist lobbyists, that being your misunderstanding of Hamas.

Why Laura, given your purported awareness of current affairs, would you use the term “stealth normalization” to describe what very simply and honestly should be called the “open recognition” of the fact that Hamas is/was the democratically and duly elected government of the Palestinian people of Gaza?

Seeing as how internationally it is an historically recognized fact; one unfortunately which the governments of Israel, the USA, (and, deplorably) Canada have failed to come to terms with for blatant political reasons and have thus deigned to foster the erroneous deception that somehow Hamas is either of the two misconceptions which you have suggested in your article, I would think that you would acknowledge this reality and not add to the misconceptions already introduced into Canadian jurisprudence by the very forces you are attempting to correct in your fine article.

[Read more...]

Israel Wants Prison For Those Recognizing the Palestinian Holocaust–Jewish Groups Remain Silent

http://theuglytruth.wordpress.com/2009/05/20/israel-wants-prison-for-those-recognizing-the-palestinian-holocaust-as-jewish-groups-remain-silent/
Israel Wants Prison For Those Recognizing the Palestinian Holocaust–Jewish Groups Remain Silent

May 20, 2009

By Mark Glenn
Correspondent
American Free Press Newspaper

www.americanfreepress.net

AggressiveJewIDF
Psycho Israeli IDF threatening a non-chosenite bringing AID to Palestinians
__________________________________________________________________________

“And the LORD spake unto Moses saying, “Speak unto the children of Israel, and say unto them the following–When ye are passed over the Jordan river into the land of Canaan, ye shall drive out all the inhabitants of the land from before you, and destroy all their pictures, and destroy all their molten images, and tear down all their high places…And ye shall dispossess the inhabitants of the land, and dwell therein, for I have given you the land to possess it…But if ye will not drive out the inhabitants of the land from before you; then it shall come to pass, that those which shall remain shall be pricks in your eyes and thorns in your sides and shall vex you in the land wherein ye dwell…”

Book of Numbers 33:50-56

In the latest coughing fit laying bare the sickness of soul infecting and guiding the very existence of the Jewish state, one of Israel’s largest political parties has introduced a bill in the Knesset outlawing freedom of speech when it comes to commemorating the other Holocaust about which no one seems to know anything, meaning what was done to the Palestinians 60+ years ago by the Jews in an event known as “al Nakbah”.

Introduced by MK Alex Miller of Israel Beiteinu (”Our Land Israel“) the bill is set for deliberation this week in a Knesset dominated by radical, messianic, violence-prone members of both the aforementioned IB party and Benjamin Netanyahu’s Likud. In the interest of covering up and then “wiping off the map” of history Israel’s 6-decade legacy of racism, genocide and terrorism against the Palestinian people, the law is but one more manifestation of what is now the all-too-typical Judeo-centric paradigm so much a part of the way Jews see themselves in relation to the rest of the world’s peoples ever since the days of Abraham and Moses.

In effect, the law criminalizes any publicly-demonstrated mourning surrounding the event taking place 61 years ago when as many as 750,000 Palestinians–Christian and Muslim alike–were “persuaded” by Jewish thugs working for terrorist organizations such as Irgun and the Stern Gang to succumb to a pre-planned program of ethnic cleansing by relocating themselves to all the luxury, opulence and comfort of tented outdoor refugee camps scattered throughout Gaza, Jordan, the West Bank and Lebanon.

[Read more...]

The Harold Wallace Rosenthal Interview: The Hidden Tyranny (1976) Part 2

http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/tyranny2.htm#The%20Hidden%20Tyranny

The Harold Wallace Rosenthal Interview: The Hidden Tyranny (1976) Part 2
MediaControl

UNPLUG, TURN OFF, TUNE OUT – USE THE INTERNET & START THINKING!
__________________________________________________________________________

The Hidden Tyranny
Part Two

“Most Jews do not like to admit it, but our god is Lucifer.”

The above is an exact quote of Harold Wallace Rosenthal, former top Administrative Aide to the then Senator Jacob Jayits, who was since defeated in the 1980 election.

I, Walter White, Jr., for the past 17 years Director and Editor of the monthly conservative publication WESTERN FRONT, was told about Mr. Rosenthal’s boastings around Washington, D.C., and I was encouraged to meet with him and to interview him (for a fee).

Mr. Rosenthal had stated publicly that the Jews will completely dominate throughout the entire world — and that they control every facet of political life in America and every aspect of the communication media. (Mr. R’s emphasis).

Eventually Mr. Rosenthal and l were brought together, at which time I interviewed him privately and taped said interview with Mr. Rosenthal’s knowledge and consent. During the lengthy meeting Mr. Rosenthal became impatient, rude and vulgar (all of which is recorded on the tape) and he sought the balance of his fee before I had concluded my questioning.

Since the entire interview was so lengthy, in 1977 we released and published only the first portion under the same title as above “THE HIDDEN TYRANNY.” Copies of this manuscript (Part I) have been sought by people from all around the globe. We now release the balance of the taped interview as Part Two. Although I do not wish to digress, an Eastern analyst has told me that “The Hidden Tyranny” manuscript (Part I) has had a pass-on readership of 3.5%. Thus, if true, the manuscript (Part I) has been read by more than 7 MILLION people. When this final portion (Part Two) begins circulating, its impact may be even greater. It depends upon you, the reader.

Before any agreement was reached between us, I had established with Mr. Rosenthal that he would answer an unlimited number of questions with complete honesty and to the best of his ability. It was because of this understanding that I took issue with Mr. Rosenthal during the final stages of the interview and accused him of not being honest with me as it related to his response to my question: “Do you have knowledge of WHEN and WHY the story began about the Jews being God’s chosen people?” That is when he said in part: “Most Jews do not like to admit it, but our god is Lucifer — so I wasn’t lying — and we are his chosen people. Lucifer is very much alive.”

As this goes to press, we still seek a governmental body to investigate Harold Rosenthal’s allegations. My dictionary conveys such allegations as “TREASON.”

We now pick up after a dispute during which the tape recorder has been turned off.

[Read more...]

The Harold Wallace Rosenthal Interview: The Hidden Tyranny (1976) Part 1

http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/tyranny1.htm#The%20Hidden%20Tyranny
The Harold Wallace Rosenthal Interview: The Hidden Tyranny (1976) Part 1
MediaControl

UNPLUG, TURN OFF, TUNE OUT – USE THE INTERNET & START THINKING!

___________________________________________________________________________

INTRODUCTION

This article contains the text of a most revealing and shocking interview of a Jew by the name of Harold Rosenthal, which was conducted in 1976, by a concerned patriot, a Walter White, Jr.. Mr. Rosenthal, an influential Jew learned in the Jewish ways and involved in the workings of government in Washington, D.C., explained the Jewish involvement and cause of the major problems we face today.

Rosenthal, in exposing certain aspects of the ‘inner invisible world of Jewry’, revealed the modes and tactics Jews have used in destroying Christian civilization and covertly attaining control over our lives and governments. The result has been a ‘hidden tyranny’ upon us like the tyranny waged against the Saints by the red beast system of Revelation referred to as ‘Mystery Babylon’.

But how could such a small number of Jews enslave so many people and gain such an overwhelming control over their governments, especially without their being aware of it? The answer to this may be found in Christ’s parable of the unjust steward, which represents Jewry. They are able to prevail in the world despite their ungodly ways because of their cunning and shrewd ways. As Christ said “For the children of this world are in their generation wiser than the children of light.” (Luke 16:8)

In other words, the Jew, with his worldly mind set, is wiser than God’s Christian people. When you read the words of Mr. Rosenthal the reality of this statement will come to light. This problem was so prevalent and important for us to overcome that Christ had instructed us to “be wise as serpents“. (Matthew 10:16)

America and the world is now covered in political, economic, moral and social problems which need to be acted upon by Christian people. As Edmund Burke stated: “The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.” But before we can properly act we need a proper (not just a superficial) understanding of the problem. This article will help provide the reader with that understanding.

[Read more...]

Henry Makow never forgets by Hans Krampe

Karl'sChurch/AH

     Watercolor painting of Karls Church in Winter by Adolf Hitler 1912

___________________________________________________________________________

[Editor’s Note:

Henry Makow’s recent articles are showing strong signs of an underlying, not-too-subtle attempt at continuing the longstanding Zionist propaganda campaign of extreme hatred toward the German people plus endless vituperation toward the National Socialist party of former Nazi Germany.

It seems that no matter how hard some Jews try to overcome their own brainwashing regarding the holy hoax commonly known as the “Jewish Holocaust” (and it is harder for Jews than for any other group I believe) there are some who, like Mr. Makow, just cannot bring themselves to the point where accepting such a truth is possible. Instead, as in Henry’s case, he continues to expound upon and support the lie of that event and in doing so paints himself into an unenviable corner; that of yet another agents provocateur coloring his otherwise token samplings of injustice with the usual, ongoing disinformation campaign against the German nation and the German people; a process that first began in earnest in 1933 has never ceased to this day.

Blending strong portions of Illuminati and Freemasonry information with a dab of Zionism and a touch of Rothschild and a sprinkle or two of Satanism to come up with the standard recipe for global hegemony on the part of these assorted groups Henry weaves a fine and captivating tale of intrigue but, alas, one which ultimately exposes him as a double-agent when he throws into his potpourri of conspiracy theories the two ingredients that inevitably separate the wheat of truth from the chaff-leaven of Talmudic Zionist falsehood – those being the standard, ongoing denigration of the German people and Adolf Hitler as the Empire of Evil and the tacit, sanctimonious support for the holocaust lie – the two pillars upon which the faulty Zionist edifice rests.

As Hans Krampe states in his title, “Henry Makow never forgets” – he never forgets to always add more layers of deception to the two lies of the 20th Century that are absolutely necessary for the Zionist Jew Conspiracy to carry on its program for complete world control.

It’s unfortunate that Henry must kowtow in this manner to the Zionists by unwittingly (or wittingly) supporting their heinous program of hatred toward the one nation that had the balls to stand up to the Bolshevik/Zionist/Communist threat to the world. When we consider that he is supposedly under attack by these very same Zionist lobbyists (the Canadian Jewish Congress) who are using the infamous Section 13(1) of the Canadian Human Rights Act to charge him with hate crimes against Jews it becomes almost too incongruous to imagine that he would allow himself to fall into the trap of emulating his oppressors and their insidious propaganda.

He was so close to breaking free of their mind-control programs; so close to ridding himself of an unnecessary lie bequeathed to all Canadians by the Zionist-controlled media; so close to discovering the truth behind the Zionist lie. So close…but not close enough Henry. And so, with a sad heart, and as the old saying goes, “Sorry Henry, close... but no cigar.]

Henry Makow never forgets
A Response to Henry Makow’s recent article, “Bormann Ran Hitler for the Illuminati”

http://www.henrymakow.com/002026.html

By Hans Krampe

May 7, 2009

hitler/bormann

In the photo with Hitler, isn’t that Henry Makow in profile?

Makowsm
Henry Makow – a Bormann agent?
_____________________________________

I think Henry Makow is an agent of Bormann, whose purpose it is to keep the memory of a devoted Bolshevik Nazi head and shoulders above that of Adi Hitler. Bormann must still be hanging in there, in South America somewhere, pulling Henry’s strings. How old would he be now? 109 or so?!

Hitler must’ve been not only an evil illuminati toy, but a successful guinea pig of a soviet style MKULTRA treatment (a “fact” still classified and buried in the Kremlin, but Henry has an inkling anyway), programmed and remote controlled. . . by Bormann. . . according to Makow’s instructive ruminations. Didn’t the Nazis invent brainwashing? Or may be they were all guinea pigs too and the illuminati made them invent it for themselves!

jfksmallest

         John F. Kennedy

_____________________________

“Hitler… one of the most significant figures who ever lived”

~ President J.F. Kennedy

“Hitler will emerge from the hatred that surrounds him now as one of the most significant figures who ever lived…
He had a mystery about him in the way that he lived and in the manner of his death that will live and grow after him.
He had in him the stuff of which legends are made.”

~ John F. Kennedy,
President of the
United States of America

GertSteinem
Jewess Gertrude Stein, Nobel Peace Laureate, recommended that Adolf Hitler be given the Nobel Peace prize. A self-hating Jew?
___________________________________________________________________________

Apparently, the illuminati seem to have paid for everything the Nazis did; like: from national bankruptcy and over 6 million unemployed to full employment and a booming economy in three years, free medicare, free education right thru university, over 1.2 million affordable and extremely attractive family homes (coddling their favorite mass murderers), the 8 hour workday, Sundays off, 21 days paid holidays a year for workers, paid maternity leave for pregnant women and young mothers, maternity spas, over 4000 new kindergartens, holiday resorts for children, luxury liners on which workers could go on two week cruises for less than 170 marks, regular symphony orchestra performances in factories, vivisection outlawed, environmental standards Henry can only dream of, even today, the Autobahn, the Volkswagen, a low cost and high standard of living etc., when the rest of the world could only think of war as a measure of ending the depression. . . and all this with no natural resources to speak of, no gold reserves and nothing but hostility surrounding the country. . . except for the illuminati. Oh, and the Zionists; mustn’t forget those.

HitlerVW

Hitler’s Volkswagen
_________________________

It had to be a short state of grace, granted to the condemned before their execution by the illuminati, who kept the cost of living low and the standard of living high in the Third Reich out of sheer cynical malice. How else could the Nazis have managed, led by clueless and treacherous Adolf?? It’s all nice and evil, no doubt! Slave labour, plain as day, has been their key to success. Henry will be sure to unearth the necessary data and interconnect things for us, you know, cross the Ts and dot the Is.

We mustn’t forget the holocaust! It happened, as Henry would no doubt agree. We just can’t prove it, because the stupid Russians won’t release the files that would. They sure hung the right guys for Katyn, though, unless anyone wants to deny that too.

Auschwitz! A sheer horror show of swimming pools, soccer fields, a 40 000 volume library, a theatre, 12 different orchestras, a state of the art hospital and dental clinic run by Jewish doctors, a maternity ward, a kindergarten, university education classes, a state of the art community kitchen, brick dormitories, a post-office, an inmate run police, a jail, a brothel; and work, lots of it, WITH PAY. And let’s not forget INVISIBLE GAS CHAMBERS. And thousands of babies burned alive in massive ditches filled to the brim with ground water. Elie Wiesel saw it all himself and – doing Louis Kilzer one better – he got a Nobel Peace Prize for writing the book “Night” about it. That should qualify it as an astute first hand account. I mean, it won the top pooba of a prize, right? They even made it into a movie. So it’s got to be true, even more so than Kilzer’s. Only problem is, nobody who knows anything about Auschwitz believes a word in it. But at least he makes the Nazis look agreeably bad, which should compensate amply for zero truth. Perhaps Henry can help us here to debunk Wiesel’s detractors.

AuschwitzPool
Auschwitz – still stands complete with brick housing facilities and swimming pool.
___________________________________________________________________________

Today, thanks to guys like Henry, we “know”, the fancy stuff in Auschwitz (typical German deviousness) was just camouflage, you understand, to make the horror look normal for the International Red Cross and the catholic priests who were there from beginning to end but aren’t allowed to sing.

You don’t believe it? Ask Henry, he will find a way to prove it. . . sort of. And if he can’t, guys like Louis Kilzer will jump into the breech. You can trust old Louis, he’s got it all figured out. The main thing is that the Nazis were bad, bad, BAD. . . and getting worse by the minute.

Henry, we’ve got the message! You can relax now; and just tell the Canadian Jewish Congress to lay off. It’s obvious that you’re going to behave from now on.

MenachemBegin
Menachem Begin
_____________________

“Our race is the Master Race. We Jews are divine gods on this planet. We are as different from the inferior races as they are from insects. In fact, compared to our race, other races are beasts and animals, cattle at best. Other races are considered as human excrement. Our destiny is to rule over the inferior races. Our earthly kingdom will be ruled by our leader with a rod of iron. The masses will lick our feet and serve us as our slaves.”  Prime Minister of Israel, Menachim Begin (left), in a speech to the Knesset, quoted in Amnon Kapeliouk, ‘Begin and the “Beasts”, New Statesman, 25 June 1982.

chomsky
Noam Chomsky
___________________

“If the Nuremberg laws were applied, then every post-war American president would have been hanged” -Professor Noam Chomsky

AHitler&YoungFriends

Adolf Hitler & Young Friends
______________________________________________________

Hitler’s proposals for a European pacification plan for Europe were delivered to the Geneva League of Nations. His proposals included:

*    prohibition of the dropping of gas, poisonous or incendiary bombs
*    prohibition of dropping any bombs outside fighting fronts
*    prohibition of artillery weapons over 12 miles from battle zones

“Germany will be perfectly ready to disband her entire military establishment and destroy the small amount of arms remaining to her, if the neighboring countries will do the same thing with equal thoroughness. Germany is entirely ready to renounce aggressive weapons of every sort if the armed nations, on their part, will destroy their aggressive weapons within a specified period, and if their use is forbidden by an international convention. Germany is at all times prepared to renounce offensive weapons if the rest of the world does the same. Germany is prepared to agree to any solemn pact of non-aggression because she does not think of attacking anybody but only of acquiring security” ~ Adolf Hitler
——–

Hans Krampe is a former feature writer for The Radical, a monthly tabloid pubished by The Radical Press from 1998 to 2002. He can be reached at Hans Krampe hjk@quesnelbc.com

Chapter 27 of The Controversy of Zion, THE “PROTOCOLS” by Douglas Reed

CoverConofZionsm

Original dustcover from 1st ed of Douglas Reed’s 1978 classic

______________________________________________________________________________

[Editor's Note: There is currently a furious battle over freedom of speech going on in Canada brought on by the infamous Section 13(1) of the Canadian Human Rights Act. Due to its subsequent misuse by pro-Zionist lobbyists such as B'nai Brith Canada and the Canadian Jewish Congress to stifle and stop all publication within Canada of any information relating to either Israeli foreign and domestic policies or information informing Canadians as to the real agenda of Political Zionism and its direct threat to Canadian institutions and laws, the Canadian Human Rights Commission and the CHR Tribunal have been hijacked into fulfilling the role of police censor and judge and jury.

This is the dilemma in which I and my website www.RadicalPress.com are caught up in. We have been subjected to continuous harassment since November of 2007 when Harry Abrams and the League for "Human Rights" of B'nai Brith Canada filed a "complaint" with the Canadian Human Rights Commission contending that I and my website are "spreading hatred toward Jews and/or citizens of Israel".  This situation has reached the "Show Trial" stage wherein the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal is attempting to fulfill its mandate to satisfy these foreign Zionist lobbyists by holding a "hearing" in which they will supposedly listen to arguments from both sides and then come to a decision as to whether or not I am guilty of said charges.

In the original complaint filed with the CHRC the complainants Abrams and B'nai Brith Canada cited the fact that I had published the "Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion" on my website and thus, obviously must be guilty of "anti-Semitism" and "hatred" toward Jews and "racism" and whatever other enduring Zionist epithet might be used to slander anyone who dares to challenge the authority of Zionist Jews. 

But now the tables appear to have been turned and both the Complainants and the Commission are trying to deny that this document was submitted as evidence and are doing their damnedest to dismiss my demand that this particular document, of all those complained of, be entered into the official file of the Commission. Their reasons and logic for attempting to do so are as curious as they are ludicrous.

For that reason I am republishing some very important information on these so-called "vicious" "anti-Semitic" Protocols which was written by the famed British journalist Douglas Reed in 1956 in his world classic, The Controversy of Zion.  No writer anywhere has ever mastered the abilities of Reed to decipher the hidden agenda of the Zionists and their insidious plan to control the world and turn its peoples into slaves of a one world government known as the New World Order. If the Canadian Human Rights Commission gets its way this vital information, extremely relevant to the world today, will be dismissed outright as the Zionists have attempted to do since the first English edition of the Protocols appeared in 1920. But while the internet remains a free exchange of ideas and information it WILL appear here at RadicalPress.com. I would ask anyone and everyone reading this article to save it and post it and pass the url to it along to their readers. Douglas Reed's interpretation of the Protocols is as vital to the overall understanding of today's political turmoil as fresh oxygen is to a living breathing human.]

Chapter 27 of The Controversy of Zion, THE “PROTOCOLS”
(circa 1956) published in 1978

by Douglas Reed

DReedsm

    DOUGLAS REED

__________________________

“The conspiracy for world dominion through a world slave state exists and cannot at this stage be abruptly checked or broken off; of the momentum which it has acquired it now must go on to fulfilment or failure. Either will be destructive for a time, and hard for those of the time in which the dénouement comes.”

~ Douglas Reed, from Chapter 27, THE “PROTOCOLS”

While Zionism thus took shape in the Eastern ghettoes during the last century and at the start of this one emerged as a new force in international affairs (when the British Government offered it Uganda), the world-revolution, in those same Talmudic areas, prepared its third “eruption”. The two forces moved forward together in synchronization (for Zionism, as has been shown, used the threat of Communism in Europe to gain the ear of European rulers for its territorial demand outside Europe). It was as if twin turbines began to revolve, generating what was in effect one force, from which the new century was to receive galvanic shocks.

According to Disraeli and Bakunin the world-revolution had come under Jewish leadership around the middle of the century, and its aims then changed. Bakunin’s followers, who sought to abolish the State as such because they foresaw that the revolutionary State might become more despotic than any earlier despotism, were ousted and forgotten. The world-revolution therewith took the shape of Karl Marx’s Communist Manifesto, which aimed at the super-State founded in slave-labour and in “the confiscation of human liberty” (as de Tocqueville wrote in 1848).

This change in leadership and aims determined the course of the 20th Century. However, the methods by which the existing order was to be destroyed did not change; they continued to be those revealed by Weishaupt’s papers published in 1787. Many publications of the 19th Century showed that the original Illuminist plan continued through the generations to be the textbook of the revolutionaries of all camps, as to method.

[Read more...]

Introduction to the Protocols

Photobucket

Introduction to the Protocols

Since it was first published more than a century ago, The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion has shocked and fascinated the world. It has appeared in countless editions in every major language, flourishing in spite of ceaseless efforts to dismiss, ridicule and suppress it.

What is this remarkable and enduring work?

Apparently a secret guide or handbook for achieving world domination, it explains how a small group of initiated Jews, the “Elders,” can gain power over the world’s non-Jewish peoples, the “goyim.”

Organized into 24 chapters or “protocols,” possibly based on notes from lectures, the work is in the form of instructions to a new member of the inner circle of conspirators. It lays out a plan by which the Elders can undermine and destroy stable societies, and impose their own monopolistic rule over humanity. To hasten the collapse of the societies not yet under their control, the conspirators will promote corruption, immorality and social strife in all countries, especially Christian ones, while working to obliterate the national, ethnic and religious character of all non-Jewish peoples.

The Jewish conspirators are instructed to work patiently toward their goal using deceit and guile, hiding their true intentions, and exploiting the naïve nature of the “goyim.” The Elders seek to replace the traditional social order with a “one world” government run by Jews that will cynically manipulate the public through control of finance and the media.

Freemasons figure in The Protocols as a secretive and well-organized group of non-Jews that is allied with the Jewish Elders, a sort of conspiracy within a conspiracy. While Freemasons and other liberals are considered helpful in destroying the traditional social order, eventually they will be shoved aside as the Jewish theocracy takes full control. The work describes a forthcoming “kingdom,” although even in this final stage of Jewish global rule, the Elders will avoid direct or open control, preferring instead to run things through devious manipulation of money, the media and cultural life. Even the “King of the Jews” will be a figurehead.

The Protocols was first published in an abridged edition, in Russian, in 1903 in the Saint Petersburg newspaper Znamya. In 1905 the full text was published in Russia by the orthodox priest Sergei Nilus, as an appendix to his work, “The Great in the Small.”

Nilus

In an introduction to a 1911 edition, Nilus explained how he obtained the manuscript:

“In 1901 a now-deceased acquaintance, Court Marshal Alexei Sukhotin of Tchernigov, gave into my possession a hand-written manuscript that detailed completely and clearly the secret Jewish-Freemason conspiracy that will surely lead to the end of our vile world. The person who gave me this manuscript assured me that it was a faithful translation of the original document. It had been stolen by a lady from one of the highest  and most influential leaders of the Freemasons following a secret meeting somewhere in France, that hot-bed of Masonic conspiracy.”

In an edition issued in 1917 Nilus wrote:

“…Now for the first time I have learned from authoritative Jewish sources that the Protocols is nothing less than the strategic plan of world conquest whereby the world will be brought under Israel’s yoke, the enemy of God. The plan, worked out by the leaders of the Jewish people during the many centuries of the Diaspora, was finally disclosed to the Elders by the Prince in Exile, Theodor Herzl, at the time of the first Zionist congress in Basel (August 1897).”

Theodor Herzl is sometimes credited as the author of The Protocols, or as the person who gave the lectures upon which the work seems to be based. He was the founder of the modern Zionist movement, and the author of The Jewish State, a highly influential booklet that was the movement’s seminal work. Just half a century after the First Zionist Congress, the Jewish state of Israel was established in Palestine, a remarkable achievement that attests to Jewish determination, power and organizational skill.

Herzl
Russia’s emperor, Tsar Nicholas II, read The Protocols with interest. In the margins of his personal copy, his handwritten notes express his first reaction: “What precise execution of their program!”; “Our [Russian] 1905 [uprising] was clearly orchestrated by the Zion Elders!”; “The Jews’ guiding and destroying had is visible everywhere.”

The November 1917 Bolshevik seizure of power in Russia seems to give shocking validation to the conspiracy laid out in The Protocols, and greatly boosted interest in the work. Bolshevism was indeed a secretive, conspiratorial movement whose ultimate goal was world domination. Along with other Communists, the Bolsheviks were fanatic followers of the German Jewish philosopher Karl Marx. They openly proclaimed that their goal was the imposition of a worldwide Communist “dictatorship of the proletariat.”

Jews were prominent among the revolutionary activists who took control of Russia in 1917 and established the Soviet regime. The two most important Bolshevik leaders were Lenin (Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov), who was one-quarter Jewish by ancestry, and Leon Trotsky (Lev Bronstein), who was entirely of Jewish descent. Trotsky headed the Red Army and, for a time, was chief of Soviet foreign affairs. Other leading Jewish Bolsheviks included Yakov Sverdlov (Solomon), who was both Bolshevik party’s executive secretary and chairman of the Soviet state’s Centrao Executive Committee; Grigori Zinoviev (Radomyslsky), who headed the Communist International (Comintern), the central agency for spreading revolution in foreign countries; press commissar Karl Radek (Sobelsohn); foreign affairs commissar Maxim Litvinov (Wallach); Lev Kamenev (Rosenfeld); and Moisei Uritsky.

Well-informed observers, both inside and outside of Russia, took note of the crucial Jewish role in Bolshevism. David R. Francis, United States ambassador in Russia, warned in a January 1918 dispatch to Washington: “The Bolshevik leaders here, most of whom are Jews and 90 percent of whom are returned exiles, care little for Russia or any other country but are internationalists and they are trying to start a worldwide social revolution.”

In England, Winston Churchill warned in an article published in the London Illustrated Sunday Herald (February 8, 1920) that Bolshevism is a “worldwide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development of envious malevolence, and impossible equality.”

Churchill

                       Winston Churchill

The eminent British political leader and historian went on to write:

“There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international and for the most part atheistical Jews. It is certainly a very great one; it probably outweighs all others. With the notable exception of Lenin, the majority of the leading figures are Jews. Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power come from the Jewish leaders. Thus Tchitcherin, a pure Russian, is eclipsed by his nominal subordinate, Litvinoff, and the influence of Russians like Bukharin or Lunacharski cannot be compared with the power of Trotsky, or of Zinovieff, the Dictator of the Red Citadel (Petrograd), or of Krassin or Radek – all Jews. In the Soviet institutions the predominance of Jews is even more astonishing. And the prominent, if not indeed the principal, part in the system of terrorism applied by the Extraordinary Commissions for Combating Counter-Revolution [the Cheka] has been taken by Jews, and in some notable cases by Jewesses.”

In 1920 editions of The Protocols began to appear in all the major European languages. The work was widely distributed throughout the 1920s and 1930s, with especially brisk sales in Britain, Germany and the United States.

The English-language text that appears in this edition was translated by Victor E. Marsden, a British journalist who was the correspondent in Russia for The Morning Post, an important London daily newspaper. After the Bolsheviks seized power in Russia, he was arrested and held prisoner for a time. Upon his release and return to England, he translated Nilus’ version into English. Marsden’s translation, first published in 1920 or 1921, has since remained the “standard” English-language text.

In the United States, an unsigned article headed “The International Jew: The World’s Problem,” appeared in the May 1920 issue of a Michigan weekly newspaper owned and controlled by the great American automobile pioneer and manufacturer Henry Ford. This was the first of dozens of articles in The Dearborn Independent that examined “the Jewish question” in detail.

HenryFordSr.

Several of the articles sympathetically discussed The Protocols. In the issue of July 10, 1920, for example, an item titled “The Jewish Political Program,” explained:

“Whosoever was the mind that conceived them [The Protocols] possessed a knowledge of human nature, of history and statecraft which is dazzling in its brilliant completeness, and terrible in the objects to which it turns its powers. Neither a madman nor an international criminal, but more likely a super-mind mastered by devotion to a people and a faith could be the author, if indeed one mind alone conceived them. It is too terribly real for fiction, too well-sustained for speculation, too deep in its knowledge of the secret springs of life for forgery…

“The internal evidence makes it clear that the Protocols were not written by a Russian, nor originally in the Russian language, nor under the influence of Russian conditions. But they found their way to Russia and were first published there…

“The progress of the Protocols in the United States can only be explained on the ground that they supply light and give meaning to certain previously observed facts, and that this light and meaning is so startling as to give a certain standing and importance to these otherwise unaccredited documents. Sheer lies do not live long, their power soon dies. These Protocols are more alive than ever.

Two weeks later The Dearborn Independent again dealt with The Protocols. In an article entitled “An Introduction to the ‘Jewish Protocols’,” readers were told:

“The Protocols as we have them are apparently the notes of lectures which were made by someone who heard them. Some of them are lengthy; some of them are brief. The assertion which has always been made in connection with the Protocols since they have become known is that they are notes of lectures delivered to Jewish students presumably somewhere in France or Switzerland. The attempt to make them appear to be of Russian origin is absolutely forestalled by the point of view, the reference to the times and certain grammatical indications.

“…Whether the Protocols are judged as proving anything concerning the Jews or not, they constitute an education in the way the masses are turned about like sheep by influences which they do not understand. It is almost certain that once the principles of the Protocols are known widely and understood by the people, the criticism which they now rightly make of the Gentile mind will no longer hold good.”

The many Dearborn Independent articles dealing with “the Jewish question” were reprinted in four book-length volumes, known collectively as The International Jew: The World’s Foremost Problem. During the next five years, hundreds of thousands of copies of The International Jew were distributed in the United States, and abridged editions, often with Henry Ford’s name on the cover, appeared in a range of languages and countries. These publications greatly boosted the fame and notoriety of The Protocols.

“The only statement I care to make about The Protocols,” said Ford in a February 1921 interview, “is that they fit in with what is going on. They are 16 years old, and they have fitted the world situation up to this time. They fit it now.”

The first German-language edition of The Protocols was published in 1920, and numerous printings and editions appeared in the following years. Alfred Rosenberg, an associate of Adolf Hitler, prepared a German edition that appeared in 1923 under the title of Die Protokolle der Weisen von Zion und die judische Weltpolitik. (After the end of World War II, Rosenberg was condemned to death by a tribunal in Nuremberg organized by the victorious Allied [Zionist-controlled] powers.)

Hitler himself remarked on The Protocols in his book Mein Kampf, which he wrote in 1924-25:

“…To what extent the whole existence of this [Jewish] people is based on a continuous lie is shown incomparably by the Protocols of the Wise Men of Zion, so infinitely hated by the Jews. They are based on a forgery, the Frankfurter Zeitung [an important Jewish-owned liberal daily] moans repeatedly to the world, which is the best evidence that they are authentic. What many Jews may do unconsciously is revealed here consciously. It does not really matter from which Jewish brain these disclosures originate. What is significant is that they reveal with rather terrifying precision the character and the activities of the Jewish nation and expose their inner contexts as well as their ultimate goals. The best critique of it, though, is reality. Anyone who examines the historical development of the last one hundred years from the perspective of this book will immediately understand the cries of the Jewish press. For when this book becomes the common property of a nation, the Jewish danger may be regarded as broken.”

AHitler

                                   Adolf Hitler

Similar comments were made by other public figures. In 1934 a widely-read Irish priest, the Rev. Denis Fahey, C.S.Sp., B.A., D.D., wrote:

“These Protocols are said to be the rough notes of a series of conferences delivered to a select body of Jewish leaders assembled in secret conclave about the end of the nineteenth century. They purport to give an outline of Jewish plans for the preparation of the Messias to come. On the one hand, the authenticity of this document cannot be proved; on the other, the efforts made by some writers, principally Jewish, to show it to be a forgery do not carry conviction to many serious minds…

“What must be kept in clearly in mind and emphasized, throughout any discussion concerning the Protocols, is the very grave fact that the program outlined in them is being fulfilled… Anyone who reads the Protocols carefully will be obliged to confess that a more skillful plan could hardly be devised for the destruction of belief in our Lord and the preparation of the advent of the new Messias. In addition, if the reader is acquainted with the world, he will see that the plan is being carried out, and that, as a result, Jewish power is increasing.”

In Canada, Member of Parliament Norman Jaques declared in the House of Commons on July 9, 1943: “Those who feel libeled by the Protocols have the most obvious remedy in the world; all they have to do is rise and denounce the policy of them, instead of denying the authorship… But when you come to read them how can any reasonable man deny the truth of what is contained in them?”

Over the years numerous efforts have been made to “expose” The Protocols as a malevolent fraud. The first was a series of articles published in August 1921 in The Times of London, which told readers that the work was a plagiarized forgery. A few weeks later these articles were reprinted in The New York Times. In the years since, countless books and articles meant to discredit The Protocols have appeared.

Many governments have banned the work outright. The first was the Soviet regime that seized power in Russia in 1917. The country’s new Bolshevik rulers severely punished anyone caught distributing or even possessing a copy. Following the victory of the Soviet Union and the United States in World War II, The Protocols was banned in most of Europe, including in all Soviet-controlled countries. More than 60 years after the end of the war, publication and distribution of the work is still prohibited in Germany, Austria, and a number of other European countries that forbid writings that might encourage anti-Jewish sentiment.

In countries where The Protocols has not been suppressed, such as in South America an Asia, the work has remained popular. In Japan, books that echo the theme of The Protocols have been bestsellers. Since the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, and the end of Soviet hegemony over central Europe, new editions have appeared in Russia and other formerly Soviet-controlled countries. The work has remained especially popular in Arab and Muslim countries, where numerous editions have been issued.

In January 2006 voters in occupied Palestine elected a new government headed by Hamas, the militantly anti-Zionist “Islamic Resistance Movement.” Article 32 of the Hamas Covenant states: “…The Zionist plan is limitless. After Palestine, the Zionists aspire to expand from the Nile to the Euphrates. When they will have digested the region they overtook, they will aspire to further expansion, and so on. Their plan is embodied in the ‘Protocols of the Elders of Zion,’ and their present conduct is the best proof of what we are saying.”

In addition to the many published editions, the internet makes The Protocols instantly available everywhere in a range of languages.

Much of the reason for the work’s enduring popularity and impact is that the conspiracy it outlines seems to be more dangerous than ever. Even many who might not accept The Protocols as an authentic document nonetheless regard it as a fascinating validation of Jewish methods and goals.

The awesome power and influence of organized Jewry is undeniable. Especially in the United States, Jews wield tremendous power, above all through their hold on television and motion pictures, and their prominent role in political life. The Jewish-run “Israel lobby” insures that U.S. Foreign policy steadfastly supports the Zionist state and its policies of brutal occupation  and aggressive war. It is this reality that moved Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir Mohammed to boldly declare in October 2003 that “today the Jews rule this world by proxy.”
——–

Read The Protocols on the RadicalPress site. Go to the following page:
http://www.radicalpress.com/?page_id=601

The Hate Crime Law Concept: It is all very sinister for at least nine major reasons by William B. Fox

FreePressCartoon

[Editor's Note: The following letter of support for freedom of speech in Canada and the USA plus the article below it is an example of the type of response that RadicalPress.com is receiving from people around the world with regard to the complaint laid by B’nai Brith Canada.

It is hoped that you will find the time to read it through and pass it along to your friends and associates.

Mr. Fox is an American who believes very strongly and passionately in the same values which those of us in Canada also are fighting to defend. His list of nine major reasons for getting rid of “hate crime” laws is as enlightening as it is frightening for all concerned citizens who wish to be treated equally under the law.

If you haven’t written a letter in support of this issue I would please ask you to reconsider and put your shoulder to the wheel for a common and worthy cause. See http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=936 for information on the case and also http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=937 for a suggested form letter explaining how to frame a letter to the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal. We need as many letters of support as possible so please do your best to write. Thank you.]

——————————————————-

Nancy Lafontant
Registry Officer
Canadian Human Rights Tribunal

Dear Ms. Lafontant:

I consider it a great honor to be able to send a letter in support of the free speech rights of Arthur Topham, publisher of the Radical Press, whose persecution under Canada’s draconian “hate crime”-related laws is being registered under file number  T1360/9008.

I run the web site www.americafirstbooks.com http://www.americafirstbooks.com/ , in which I have archived the works of free speech activist Rev. Ted Pike at: http://tinyurl.com/44xyoo .  There is quite a lot of material on this web page that is relevant to this case.

First, it contains numerous articles that document the underhanded tactics of the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai Brith (an unregistered agent of Israel) to steal free speech rights under the guise of “hate crime” laws in America as well as Canada.

Secondly, numerous articles by Rev. Ted Pike and his niece Harmony Grant explain how the Canadian Human Rights Act is exactly the kind of Orwellian nightmare that we must avoid here in America at all costs.  For this reason, I spent more than two full days of my time recently calling up every member of the House Judiciary Committee in Washington, D.C. to make my own personal strenuous effort to try to defeat the currently proposed “hate crime” legislation.  An archived copy of the follow on email that I sent to Congressmen can be found here: http://tinyurl.com/bay6s4 .

Please watch Rev. Ted Pike’s ten minute video that explains the Trojan Horse nature of proposed hate crime legislation in America, and how similar legislation has subverted Canadian free speech:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c9Fyva1Vwbk&eurl=http://www.truthtellers.org/&feature=player_embedded .

At the end of this email I have reproduced the same essay that I submitted in my emails to Congressmen.  It is titled: “The Hate Crime Law Concept: It is all very sinister for at least nine major reasons.”

To put it bluntly, when it comes to the whole “hate crime” concept, the King wears no clothes. We should get all “hate crime” laws off the books and go back to being more free and civilized, as both Americans and Canadians were decades ago before all this Orwellian “hate crime” nonsense got snuck in through various Trojan Horse legislative initiatives.

[Read more...]

Horst Mahler’s Closing Statement

MahlerHorst2

HORST MAHLER – VICTIM OF ZIONIST LIES

______________________________________

“Words fall into the flames of injustice like raindrops into Hell’s inferno when I attempt to express my outrage at the scale and intent of this lie against humanity.”

– Arthur Topham

_________________________
Thursday, February 26, 2009
From:
“Völkische Reichsbewegung” info-hm@voelkische-reichsbewegung.org

Horst Mahler’s Closing Statement
Translated from the German by J M Damon

In My Show Trial Before Munich District Court II
Case No. 2 KLs 11 Js 42142/07

Closing Statement

The great mystery of human history has finally entered our consciousness as knowledge of Truth.

The passage of God through the world that He created is revealed to us as the eternal struggle within God Himself, as He participates in the struggle against evil on behalf of what we humans consider the Good. Through us, God thus becomes Absolute Spirit, which, transcending morality, is neither good nor bad.

Man cannot judge God. We can exist only as a Volk. Without a Volk, Man cannot exist as Man.

As Herder taught us, nations exist as thoughts of God. They have identity and significance only insofar as they can be distinguished from one another.

An orchestra consisting of nothing except violins would quickly bore the audience. Every Volk is a separate thought or concept of God and has the obligation to preserve itself as such, through all changes and vicissitudes.

It is the destiny of Judaism, the diffused nation within other nations, to exist as the spirit of negation. Without this spirit of negation God could not know what He is not as well as what He intends to be. Because it exists as the spirit of negation, Zion is and ever has been hated and shunned by all nations. (Book of Isaiah, Chap. 60, Verses 14 and 15).

In our (Christian) age, however, Zion has been redeemed by the nations through their acknowledgment of Judaism as “the negation of the lives of nations” (Martin Buber.)

Zion’s redemption began with Jesus’ words:

“You (the leaders of Zion) belong to your father, the devil, and you want to carry out your father’s desire.
He was a murderer from the beginning, not holding to the truth, for there is no truth in him.
When he lies, he speaks his native language, for he is a liar and the father of lies.
Because I tell the truth, you do not believe me!”

(John 8, 44-45)

As servants of God the Trinity, the Jews established the Empire of Mammon as a challenge and admonition for the nations of the Earth. The Empire of Mammon is now reaching its end, however. It has the lie of Jewish “gas chamber genocide” to thank for its culmination as well as its fall. The gas chamber or “Auschwitz Lie” was indeed the greatest lie in the history of mankind.

Now that the world monetary swindle has culminated and been exposed, the world is asking itself: “How could such a swindle have occurred?” It came about through international illusions about the role and the true nature of Judaism, in particular illusions about Jewish plutocrats. These illusions have now vanished, along with the make-believe homicidal gas chambers utilizing Cyclon B Insecticide at Auschwitz Concentration Camp. The Auschwitz Lie has finally run its course and the truth has triumphed.

The mighty protector of Israel, the United States of America, is disintegrating before our eyes, while the “Holocaust” Cult is devouring itself in ratlike fury by persecuting those who dare to expose it. If there were real empirical, forensic or documentary evidence for the unique crime that the Jewish-owned media call “Holocaust,” they would certainly have presented it long ago, and this would have enabled them to neutralize their skeptics with ridicule. But there is no such evidence, since no gas chamber genocide occurred.

It is incumbent upon companions of our Volk to deliver the death blow to the Judaic  “Holocaust” Cult, and this can be accomplished only through self-sacrifice. Until now we have been duped by the Jewish Media into opposing the compulsory “Holocaust” dogma under the banner of freedom of opinion. From now on, however, we are no longer restricted to struggling for human rights under this banner. Now there is more at stake than winning freedom to express opinions. The continuation of our existence as a German nation is at stake, the survival of our Volk.

Guilt kills the human spirit, as mankind has known since the pioneering discoveries by the Jewish scientist Sigmund Freud. Section 130 Paragraph 3 of the Criminal Code is more than a mere “muzzle” – it is a weapon for the spiritual destruction of our Volk, used in relentless attacks on our existence as a nation. Section 130 is illegal under international law. We are compelled to defend ourselves against it — and not just for our own sake. The German Volk is the light of the nations. We have a God-given obligation to keep it alive and beaming.

Germans must comprehend that, in the ancient Talmudic spirit, world Jewry is now attacking our right to defend ourselves and preserve our Volk with life imprisonment! Such drastic punishment is a good measure of their desperation. It has become necessary because Germans of sound character can no longer desist from speaking the truth and calling the Auschwitz Lie by its name.

Everyone  who acknowledges the right and the necessity of self-defense has a duty to oppose the Jewish genocide against the German spirit. The way to oppose this genocide is to speak the truth.

In our day, the German who does not kowtow to the Jews will be relentlessly brought before the courts and deprived of his freedom, so that he will spend his life behind bars. I stand convicted of exposing Talmudic perfidiousness by ceaselessly calling the Auschwitz Lie by its name and confronting it with the truth. I have been doing this for many years now, since I swore a sacred oath to my Volk never to relent in the struggle against the “Holocaust” Cult.

At the age of 73, I can expect to spend the rest of my days under the dictates of the foreign interests that dominate our Fatherland. 21 months of imprisonment have already been pronounced. In addition to this, the vassals of foreign domination in Potsdam District Court demand another 57 months while those in Munich demand 72 months. For a 73-year-old man, a sentence of twelve and a half years is life imprisonment.

Quod erat demonstrandum!
[This is what had to be demonstrated.]

I ask my fellow Germans: do you want to languish forever?
Throw off the joke of Jacob!
We have the most powerful weapon of all, the Truth.
We must make use of it!

Munich, 25 February 2009

Treason doth never prosper, what’s the reason?
For if it prosper, none dare call it treason!
Sir John Harrington 1561-1612.
Here’s freedom to him who would speak,
Here’s freedom to him who would write;
For there’s none ever feared that the truth should be heard,
Save him whom the truth would indict!

Robert Burns (1759–96)
****************

Six Years for Mahler’s Crime of Opinion! Dissident Led from Courtroom in Chains

Mahlerpic

Horst Mahler’s wife attorney Sylvia Stoltz and Horst Mahler
mahlerhorst1

http://www.adelaideinstitute.org/LEGAL2009/Mahler_Munich.htm

Six Years for Mahler’s Crime of Opinion!
Dissident Led from Courtroom in Chains

February 27, 2009

The Munich District Court has sentenced former Nationalist Attorney Horst Mahler to six years in prison.The 72-year-old was charged with a variety of opinion crimes.Two weeks ago he was sentenced to ten months imprisonment for similar crimes of conscience by a court in Landshut.A third sentence is still to be pronounced by Potsdam Court.In that trial, likewise on charges of uttering criminal opinions, the prosecutor has asked for four years and nine months.Mahler’s combined sentences come to 12 years and 5 months.

Mahler persists in expressing skepticism about the “Holocaust” Cult, which is the official state dogma of the pro Zionist regime in Germany.
The regime interprets such skepticism as incitement against all Jews, even though Jews are among the most outspoken critics of “Shoa Business” or “Holocaust Industry” (expressions coined by the Jews Aba Eban and Norman Finkelstein.)

The Munich court convicted the 72-year-old disbarred attorney of referring to “Holocaust” as “the greatest lie in all human history.” Mahler had also mailed CDs of Diploma Engineer Germar Rudolf’s proscribed book “Lectures on the Holocaust” to a number of persons.

On 14 November 2007, as part of the movement for human rights in Germany, he had filed an official complaint against himself. In an accompanying letter to the recipients of the CDs he had pointed out that they would have to testify against him in his trial. He instructed them to state that he had written, “I understand and accept that I will be tried and sentenced for this act.” Now he has received a sentence that surpasses those of other political dissidents by far.

Mahler’s trial makes clear that merely merely pointing out that “Holocaust Denial” is involved can legitimize any and all official tyranny. It makes clear that a dissident in “the freest state that ever existed on German soil” as the present regime likes to call itself, can receive a sentence surpassing that of the most violent criminal or murderer.

As some Altermedia readers will recall, in April of last year the stateless Lebanese Josef Ahmad was sentenced by Aachen District Court to exactly six years for the murder of Kevin Plum. If Mahler had simply beaten a father of several children into a coma, the State might have let him off with a warning and a course in aggression control, as it did in the case of the Turkish bully Erdinc S. of Cologne.

In view of the Mahler’s advanced age, today’s sentence probably means a death sentence for the crime of uttering dissident opinions. It probably makes executioners of his Munich judges. Does it invite comparison with previous ruthless regimes in Germany?

Latest Report: Altermedia was just informed by Philipp Hasselbach, a Free Nationalist, that Mahler was immediately arrested and led in handcuffs from the courtroom. Since he was expecting this, he had brought his packed suitcase along. He had also given his car keys to a friend. There were no surprises!

****************

Here’s freedom to him who would speak,
Here’s freedom to him who would write;
For there’s none ever feared that the truth should be heard,
Save him whom the truth would indict!

ROBERT BURNS (1759–96)

Zionists and rabbis not satisfied by Bishop’s apology

BishopRWilliamson

The Hoffman Wire
Dedicated to Freedom of the Press, Investigative Reporting and Revisionist History

Subscribe: HoffmanWire-subscribe@topica.com
Michael A. Hoffman II: Editor. RevisionistHistory.org

***

http://revisionistreview.blogspot.com/2009/02/zionists-and-rabbis-not-satisfied-by.html
Zionists and rabbis not satisfied by Bishop’s apology

Friday, February 27, 2009

Within hours the unforgiving, never-satisfied, ever-vengeful Talmudists and Zionists have rejected Bishop Williamson’s apology for telling the truth about the Auschwitz execution gas chamber tale.

“We should not imagine that we can calm a lion who wants to devour his prey just by giving him a little ball of meat.” -Don Curzio Nitoglia

***

Vatican Says Bishop Apology Fell Short

Feb. 27, 2009

VATICAN CITY (Reuters) – The Vatican said on Friday that an apology by a traditionalist bishop who denied the Holocaust fell short of meeting the Holy See’s demand for a full and public recanting of his position. British Bishop Richard Williamson, whose comments in January caused a worldwide uproar among Jews and Catholics, on Thursday issued a statement in which he said: “To all souls that took honest scandal from what I said, before God I apologize.” But chief Vatican spokesman Father Federico Lombardi said Williamson’s statement “does not seem to respect the conditions” set forth by the Vatican on February 4, when it ordered Williamson to “in an absolutely unequivocal and public way distance himself from his positions” regarding the Holocaust.

Critics reject ‘apology’ from Holocaust-denial bishop Richard Williamson
Times (UK) February 27, 2009

The British bishop whose denial of the extent of the Holocaust embroiled the Pope in an international outcry has had his attempt to defuse the row rejected by religious and educational groups worldwide.

Bishop Richard Williamson last night issued a grudgingly-worded apology for the offence caused by an interview on Swedish television, in which he said that no Jews were killed in the gas chambers.

His words were today dismissed as “empty” because he refused to say whether he still believes that such claims were “lies”.

“The Holy Father and my Superior, Bishop Bernard Fellay, have requested that I reconsider the remarks I made on Swedish television four months ago, because their consequences have been so heavy,” Bishop Williamson said in a statement released by the Zenit Catholic news agency.

“Observing these consequences I can truthfully say that I regret having made such remarks, and that if I had known beforehand the full harm and hurt to which they would give rise, especially to the Church, but also to survivors and relatives of victims of injustice under the Third Reich, I would not have made them.”

Bishop Williamson said he was only giving his opinion as a non-historian. “An opinion formed 20 years ago on the basis of evidence then available, and rarely expressed in public since.”

He added: “However, the events of recent weeks and the advice of senior members of the Society of St Pius X have persuaded me of my responsibility for much distress caused. To all souls that took honest scandal from what I said, before God I apologise.”

Mark Frazer, a spokesman for the Board or Deputies of British Jews, said: “The Jewish community and many more besides will be unmoved by this apology. The Vatican were very clear that Richard Williamson must recant, yet he continues to refuse to do so. Sadly, this late regret comes across as nothing more than an empty sentiment from a man under the pressure of public scrutiny.”

Iris Rosenberg, spokeswoman for the Yad Vashem Holocaust Museum in Jerusalem, said: “If he is looking to repent, he needs to admit that he was wrong in denying the truth.”

Stephen Smith, founder of Britain’s Holocaust Centre, said the apology was “far from complete.” Dr Smith said: “If Bishop Williamson is sincere in his apology and, recognising the harm caused by his original statement, recognises the truth that was the Holocaust, I invite him to visit us at the Holocaust Centre at any time so that his views in future are based on historical fact rather than 20-year-old anti-Semitic myths.”

Pope Benedict XVI lifted Bishop Williamson’s excommunication in January, days after the interview was broadcast, leading to an explosion of incredulous anger.

The Vatican said his aim had been to bring the Society of St Pius X, the ultraconservative sect to which Bishop Williamson belongs, back into full communion with the Church and that he had been unaware of Bishop Williamson’s views. The Pope was subsequently forced to condemn the bishop’s remarks and speak out strongly against anti-Semitism.

Rabbi Marvin Hier, founder and dean of the Simon Wiesenthal Centre in Los Angeles, said Bishop Williamson’s statement was “not the kind of an apology that would end this matter; because it failed to address the central issue. The one thing he doesn’t say, and the main thing, is that the Holocaust occurred, that it is not a fabrication, that it is not a lie,” he said. “If you want to make an apology, you have to affirm the Holocaust.”

Jewish groups in Italy called the apology “thoroughly ambiguous” and Dieter Graumann, vice-president of the Central Council for Jews in Germany, told the Handelsblatt newspaper that the statement was “thoroughly bungled.”

Bishop Williamson would not respond to request to clarify his views.

***

FOR FURTHER RESEARCH:

The John Paul II Theology of Pope Benedict XVI

Judaism Discovered: A Study of the Anti-Biblical religion of Racism, Self-Worship, Superstition and Deceit

NEWS RELEASE FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE FEBRUARY 23, 2009 INTERNATIONALLY RENOWNED CANADIAN FREE SPEECH LAWYER DOUGLAS CHRISTIE INTERVENES IN ABRAMS/B’NAI BRITH V. RADICALPRESS.COM HUMAN RIGHTS TRIBUNAL HEARING

dougchristie

DOUGLAS CHRISTIE – DEFENDER OF FREEDOM OF SPEECH

___________________________________________________
NEWS  RELEASE
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE FEBRUARY 23, 2009

INTERNATIONALLY RENOWNED CANADIAN FREE SPEECH LAWYER DOUGLAS CHRISTIE INTERVENES IN ABRAMS/B’NAI BRITH V. RADICALPRESS.COM HUMAN RIGHTS TRIBUNAL HEARING

QUESNEL, B.C. – Arthur Topham, Publisher and Editor of RadicalPress.com, says he received an email from the Victoria, B.C. Law Office of Douglas Christie on Friday, February 20th, 2009 confirming Mr. Christie’s interest in the current Canadian Human Rights Tribunal hearing process involving the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada v. Topham and his website RadicalPress.com (Complaint No.: 20071016).

In an email letter to Registry Officer Nancy LaFontant and Tribunal member Karen Jensen of the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal in Ottawa, Ontario Mr. Christie stated:

“I am general counsel of the Canadian Free Speech League, and as such I am interested in the case of Arthur Topham. I would like the opportunity to intervene on behalf of the free speech issues raised in this case. We were allowed intervention status in the case of Marc Lemire, and it is our desire to assist in the maintenance of a constitutional challenge to the enabling legislation, as well as to participate in the fact-finding that would be the foundation of such an assessment.”

Topham’s case first came to light back in November of 2007 when Harry Abrams, B.C. representative for the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada and his co-complainant the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada filed a complaint with the Canadian Human Rights Commission (CHRC) alleging that he, Topham, Owner, Publisher and Editor of RadicalPress.com was promoting “hatred toward Jews and citizens of Israel” because of articles on his website critical of both political Zionism and the actions of the foreign Jewish state of Israel.

Topham, who has publishing both a hard copy newspaper, The Radical (now defunct) and an online new site since 1998, said that after receiving the complaint back in November of 2007 he filed a hard-hitting, detailed, and thoroughly  documented 13-page Response http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=629 which he sent to CHRC “hate-team” investigator Sandy Kozak sandy.kozak@chrc-ccdp.ca on January 3, 2008.

On September 5, 2008 Topham received the Investigation Report from Ms. Natalie Dagenais, Director, Investigations Division. http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=785 . He was given until September 17, 2008 to comment on the Report. See: http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=786 .

On November 21, 2008 Topham received confirmation from the CHRC that the complaint would be moved to the Tribunal stage with the possibility of a hearing.

On January 14, 2009 Topham received an email from the CHR Tribunal requesting confirmation of whether or not he wanted to enter into a mediation process with the complainants. Topham declined to participate giving the Tribunal his reasons in a letter dated January 28, 2009. See: http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=893 .

With the Tribunal hearing now underway Topham said he was deeply honored to receive word that Mr. Christie had taken an interest in the case and was planning to intervene as General Counsel of the Canadian Free Speech League, a society that defends freedom of expression in Canada.

“No one accused of ‘hate speech’ could ask for or expect a better man of principle to stand by him than Doug Christie,” Topham said. “Mr. Christie has a well-deserved reputation world-wide as Canada’s most prolific defender of free speech, having appeared in the Supreme Court of Canada in that capacity more than any other counsel. Mr. Christie has been defense counsel for James Keegstra, Ernst Zundel, Malcolm Ross, John Ross Taylor, Tony McAleer, Imre Finta and in his most recent case that of First Nations leader David Ahenakew. And so it would be an understatement to say that I was both surprised and deeply grateful for the fact that Mr. Christie would take an interest in my case.”

As Doug Christie states on his website http://www.douglaschristie.com he has “challenged the powers of big government, the income tax department, big banking institutions, “human rights” commissions, social service bureaucracies, and other forces seeking at times to unjustifiably curtail the liberty of individuals.”

“Who could ask for a finer ally than that in my struggle with the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada and the censors within the Canadian Human Rights Commission and the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal,” Topham said.

“The root cause of all the legal problems facing writers, bloggers and publishers in Canada is the infamous Sec. 13(1) of the Canadian Human Rights Act. It’s the most specious piece of Orwellian legislation ever to have (dis)graced the law books of Canadian jurisprudence; one which prohibits truth and intent from entering into a person’s defense when such a complaint has been filed against them” Topham added, “and that is why I intend to also file a constitutional challenge to this undemocratic and draconian section of the CHR Act.”

-30-

CONTACT: Arthur Topham

Email: radical@radicalpress.com

Website: http://www.radicalpress.com

Home: 1-250-992-3479

What’s the Big Deal about the Holocaust?

6MilMyth

http://incogman.wordpress.com/2009/02/16/whats-the-big-deal-about-the-holocaust/
What’s the Big Deal about the Holocaust?

February 16, 2009

WARNING: Reading this blog article and thinking about the issues covered may force you to completely reevaluate the real deal going on America’s head today. You may not want to take the red pill, Neo!

All over the place nowadays, people are asking questions about the Holocaust and wondering why this subject is still so controversial after all this time. What is it now, 64 years? People are too scared to voice any doubts, since they’ve been programmed to think that anyone who does so must be evil and anti-Semitic. But when you think about it, sentiments like that should be quite separate from historical facts and never, ever subject to legal efforts.

So, why is the Holocaust such a big deal? Because it’s a major leg propping up the New World Order and the people behind the curtain — no doubt about it. They know that if you start asking questions about any of this, soon it will lead to a whole helluva lot more. And it’s so easy to see all the reasons (below), that they’ve pushed this version of history on America and the White countries of the West — all the while knowing how much outrage the public would have for being lied to.

Recently, a Catholic Bishop in Argentina came out during a interview and said it was 200,000 to 300,000 Jews who died in the camps and none in a gas chamber. Bishop Richard Williamson ignited a bit of firestorm over his statements and was even briefly mentioned on the mainstream news.
BishopRWilliamson

Bishop Richard Williamson

Jew Thought Police, like the ADL’s Abe Foxman went haywire about it, demanded and had the spineless Vatican denounce his comments and remove him from the pulpit. World Jewish leaders then told the Vatican that “Holocaust denial is not an opinion, but a crime.” Jews ordered them to declare Holocaust denial as “heresy” and undergo Holocaust education.

Such is the arrogance of International Jewry and Big Zionism today. The Jews have always had it in for the Catholic church. They completely demonized and demoralized the church with non-stop press coverage of the Gay pedophile priests, still going strong today. Funny, how the press never breathes a word about all the rabbis who have been caught doing this kind of thing.

Another thing you won’t hear about in the mainstream media is that the Jews in Europe now want the Bishop literally arrested and thrown in the slammer. That’s right: By questioning anything about the sacred Holocaust can earn you a prison term in 11 countries in Europe and Canada. This should be completely unacceptable to any free thinking White person!

People like Ernst Zündel now sit in prison over what they’ve said in public (letters of support have even been kept from reaching him); Dr. Fredrik Töban from Australia came close to going to jail in Germany, simply for making an airport connection in Britain where Bobbies arrested him for the Germans, but brave free speech advocates soon came to his rescue and the government finally released him. Simon Shepard and Stephen Whittle, who created the fascinating site The Heretical Press, are now in jail by the British thought crime police after trying to flee to America for their political beliefs.

David Irving, once a highly respected WWII historian (he blew wide open the Hitler Diary forgery), had spent a decade in the German archives researching the war and then ended up spending 3 years in a Austrian Jail for what he dared say in print about the Holocaust evidence.

Let’s keep one thing perfectly clear about the topic: Holocaust “revisionism” does NOT say the Nazis didn’t kill Jews or anyone else for that matter. How many? Probably a lot. But so did the Soviets kill a lot of Whites (below). And the US and Britain killed over 600,000 White civilians in horrific bombing campaigns against the German cities. 3 Million Germans starved to death after the war, many of them POW’s penned up in American General Dwight Eisenhower’s open-air camps, exposed to the elements and fed almost nothing until they died.

Jew-killers

What they don’t want you to know: Millions of Whites were starved to death (1) and executed by Commies in the “Holmador” under the direction of Jews like Lazar Kaganovich (2). Far, far more White Gentiles suffered at the hands of Commie Jews than whatever the Nazis ever did. (3) Stalin’s chief propagandist, the Jew Ilya Ehrenburg exhorted Soviet troops to rape and murder the women and children of Germany (4). His deviously imaginative anti-Nazi propaganda and genocide lies were later regurgitated by Globalist Zionists and regular Jewry on the naïve White countries of the West.

Solzhenitsyn2jpg

This guy lived through it.

Will you or your children?

The Bolsheviks and later, the Soviet Communists, killed millions of White Gentiles. In 1957, the Soviets admitted that 15 to 25 million were executed or starved to death since the Red revolution. But Alexandr Solzhenitsyn (right), in his book “The Gulag Archipelago,” using the research of I. A. Kurganov who had access to a secret government file, estimated it was 66 million who were killed. Jews were predominate in the secret police, like the NKVD and Cheka; in fact, the 6 leading administrators of Stalin’s death apparatus, Aron Solts, Yakov Rappoport, Lazar Kogan, Matvei Berman, Genrikh Yagoda and Naftaly Frenkel were all Jews.

[Read more...]

What Does Holocaust Denial Really Mean? by Daniel McGowan

DissVoiceHdr

http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2009/02/what-does-holocaust-denial-really-mean/
What Does Holocaust Denial Really Mean?

by Daniel McGowan

February 17th, 2009

In April 2007 the European Union agreed to set jail sentences up to three years for those who deny or trivialize the Holocaust.1 More recently, in response to the remarks of Bishop Richard Williamson, the Pope has proclaimed that Holocaust denial is  intolerable and altogether unacceptable. 

But what does Holocaust denial really mean? Begin with the word Holocaust. The Holocaust2 (spelled with a capital H) refers to the killing of six million Jews by the Nazis during World War II. It is supposed to be the German’s “Final Solution” to the Jewish problem. Much of the systematic extermination was to have taken place in concentration camps by shooting, gassing, and burning alive innocent Jewish victims of the Third Reich.

People like Germar Rudolf, Ernst Zundel, and Bishop Williamson who do not believe this account and who dare to say so in public are reviled as bigots, anti-Semites, racists, and worse. Their alternate historical scenarios are not termed simply revisionist, but are demeaned as Holocaust denial. Rudolf and Zundel were shipped to Germany where they were tried, convicted, and sentenced to three and five years, respectively. Williamson may not be far behind.

Politicians deride Holocaust revisionist papers and conferences as  beyond the pale of international discourse and acceptable behavior.3 Non-Zionist Jews who participate in such revisionism, like Rabbi Dovid Weiss of the Neturei Karta, are denounced as “self-haters” and are shunned and spat upon. Even Professor Norman Finkelstein, whose parents were both Holocaust survivors and who wrote the book, The Holocaust Industry, has been branded a Holocaust denier.

But putting aside the virile hate directed against those who question the veracity of the typical Holocaust narrative, what is it that these people believe and say at the risk of imprisonment and bodily harm? For most Holocaust revisionists or deniers if you prefer, their arguments boil down to three simple contentions:

[Read more...]

‘Lancet’ Reveals Horrendous Israeli War Crimes

GazaShotZios

http://www.rense.com/general85/crimes.htm

‘Lancet’ Reveals Horrendous
Israeli War Crimes
Dr Gideon Polya
February 16, 2009

The horrendous mortality and morbidity statistics revealed by the paper “The Wounds of Gaza”, just published in the prestigious medical journal The Lancet are truly shocking: 1,350 killed (60% children) and 5,450 severely wounded (40% children) in reprisals for zero (0) Israeli deaths from Gaza rockets in the preceding year. This demands International Criminal Court and intra-national prosecutions (e.g. in major Israeli military R & R destination countries Australia, the US, the UK and India) and Sanctions and Boycotts against Apartheid Israel by all decent Australians and indeed all decent people around the world.

The Gaza Strip is a self-governing Apartheid Israeli Concentration Camp ruled by the Hamas Government which won 76 out of 132 seats in the Occupied Palestinian Parliamentary elections held under Israeli guns in 2006 (Fatah won 43 seats) (see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Hamas ). The Israelis responded by arresting as many Hamas MPs as they could find, the remainder fleeing to Gaza. In the current Israeli Gaza Massacre, the Israelis are evidently bent on “finishing the job” (they have already destroyed the Gaza Parliament House). The war criminal, pro-Zionist Western backers of Apartheid Israel followed suit by declaring the democratically elected Hamas MPs to be “terrorists” and only dealing with the Fatah.

Under the loathed, … racist Apartheid regime in South Africa its Bantustans were policed by police and the worst atrocity was the 1960 Sharpeville Massacre in which South African police killed 69 African protesters (see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Sharpeville_massacre ) – “The official figure is that 69 people were killed, including 8 women and 10 children, and over 180 injured, including 31 women and 19 children”.

Gaza – what the Catholic Church via Vatican justice and peace minister Cardinal Renato Martino and leading US conservative Pat Buchanan both call an Israeli-guarded Gaza Concentration Camp (see: http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,24888817-15084,00.html and http://www.youtube.com/watch? v=em8tREX9L8o ) – remains under blockade and under dire threat of further Israeli atrocities, this latest atrocity involving 1,350 Palestinians killed in asserted reprisals for zero (0) Israeli deaths from Gaza rockets in the preceding year and 28 Israeli deaths from Gaza missiles in the preceding 8.25 years, this latter statistic yielding an “annual homicide rate” in “persons killed per million of population” of 0.5 (Israelis killed by Gaza missiles) as compared to 0.5 (rapist husbands killed by raped wives), 1.0 (violent husbands killed by battered wives), 15 (Israelis by Israelis), 56 (Americans), 100 (Americans by guns), 164 (Palestinians killed violently by Israelis), 200 (African-Americans), 473 (citizens of Detroit, Michigan, USA) and 902 per million per year (annual Palestinian non- violent deaths through war criminal, Geneva Convention-violating Israeli-imposed deprivation) (see Dr Gideon Polya, “Palestinian- Israeli Death Ratios . [...] Israeli Gaza War Crimes”: http:// mwcnews.net/content/view/27795/42/ ).

However, the numerically vastly greater Israel atrocity lies in the avoidable deaths (excess deaths) in the Occupied Palestinian Territory due to Occupier refusal to supply life-sustaining food, medicine and medical services to its conquered subjects “to the fullest extent of the means available to it”, as unequivocally demanded by Articles 55 and 56 of the Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War (see: http:// www.unhchr.ch/html/menu3/b/92.htm ).

3,000 under-5 year old Occupied Palestinian infants die every year (about 80% avoidably), this corresponding to 3,000/ 0.7 = 4,286 total avoidable deaths annually (see “Layperson’s Guide to Counting Iraq Deaths”: http://mwcnews.net/content/view/5872/26/ ), and 4,286 x 8.25 = 35,360 non-violent Occupied Palestinian deaths since September 2000, in addition to the 6,200 violent Occupied Palestinian deaths at the hands of Apartheid Israelis in this period.

[Read more...]

ALL ALONE ON THE RIGHTS GRIDDLE By Doug Collins

ThoughtCrimes

ALL ALONE ON THE RIGHTS GRIDDLE
By Doug Collins

[Editor's Note: I was reflecting on this piece Sunday morning as I read it through. Here was a man of singular honesty, forthright and filled with courage at the age of 77, writing in defense of his sincere belief in the value of freedom of thought and expression. A man who had, at the age of 19, joined in fighting a war that he felt would keep the world free of the sorts of traitorous acts which, 58 years later, would return to haunt him and his work as a Canadian journalist (not to mention the rest of us free speech lovers).

That of course brought to mind Harry Abrams and the League for Human Rights of B'nai Brith Canada who were attacking everything that Collins had fought for (including escaping 11 times from Germany prisoner-of-war camps before the age of 25!) all of which was cause for rumination on my part and the recognition that in today's world how cheap and taudry have become the old principles of respect for and admiration of our elders especially those who sacrificed so damn much in order that we Canadians of today would have the freedom to express our thoughts and ideas without fear of repression and harassment and imprisonment and fines.

The idea of this relatively young, baby-boomer Abrams and his co-conspirator the B'nai Brith, doing their damnedest to destroy the credibility and integrity of one of Canada's true heroes I found to be exceedingly repulsive and contemptible.

My own Dad, born in 1918 only two years before Doug Collins and a man who also fought in WW2 against the supposed “fascists", had he the requisite literary skills that Doug did, would likely have taken the same position of Collins on these very issues that Abrams and his pro-Zionist org B'nai Brith Canada are hell-bent on imposing upon the Canadian legal and political environment. When I look at Doug's picture I also see my Father and become that much more incensed at the thought of what these anti-democratic, ungrateful and miserable, misinformed misanthropes are attempting to do to the most cherished of human values.

And for what I'm forced to ask? So that they can prevent Canadians from weighing the facts both pro and con as per the endless propaganda that's been literally forced upon the minds of Canadians for decade upon decade? Hardly a justification for making critical analysis a crime.

Now these censors are not only unhappy with preventing “hatred toward Jews" in Canada. In addition to such a totalitarian/Bolshevik notion they also want to stop Canadians from extending any critical analysis to the foreign nation of Israel as well. How quaint. What next? No criticism of the Harper Conservatives or the Ignaiff (Jewish) Liberals or the Layton NDP or the May Greens because they all happen to be in the same bed with the Jewish Lobbyists like the CJC and the B'nai Brith and so in their orgies of appreciation for this racist, apartheid state and their blatant prostrations before their Zionist idol of innocence and endless persecution any protest of a frank and critical nature against them must also not be allowed to enter into the slipstream of Canadian thought? That, I propose, is the intent of this latest attack upon myself and RadicalPress.com. They're out to set a new precedent in duplicious cowery, one that I could, and would, and will state is on par with Israel's latest precedent-setting example of humanitarianism respecting their recent slaughter of the innocent Palestinian people of Gaza.

We must NEVER forget men like Doug Collins and what they spent their lives fighting for: the Free Will and God-given Right of every human being to express their deepest ideas and concerns without fear or threat or intimidation by others.]

————-
ALL ALONE ON THE RIGHTS GRIDDLE
By Doug Collins
July 20, 1997

from the North Shore News

North Vancouver, B.C.

Your man Doug is in trouble for saying that the “holocaust” six million story is nonsense, that the biggest influence in Hollywood is the Jewish influence, and that the whole thing has become a business.

Which latter point was emphasized some time ago by the Chief Rabbi in the U.K. As they say in Israel, “There’s no business like Shoah (holocaust) business.”

So while we await the verdict of the Great Heresy Trial, [the one involving Harry Abrams and B'nai Brith Canada. A.T.] I want to ask a question. If the Commissars of Right-think don’t mind, that is. Or even if they do mind.

It is this: how come that I am the only one on the griddle?

A chap called Michael Enright shot his mouth off a couple of months back.

Enright, successor to Peter Gzowski on the ever-holy – and blessed by liberals - CBC Morningside, declared that next to the Mafia, the Roman Catholic Church was the biggest criminal organization around.

There were a couple of squeeks of surprise. But no witch hunt. Little old Michael was in safe hands.

Allan Fotheringham didn’t call him a monster.

The Sun’s Vaughn Palmer didn’t call him contemptible.

Writer David Mitchell didn’t call him anti-Catholic. Which, of course, is by no means as moral a sin as being “anti-Semitic”.

Nobody complained to the Ontario Human Rights Commission about Enright, either. But what do you think would have happened if I had said that those of the Jewish faith were the biggest bunch of crooks outside of the Mafia?

The sky would have fallen. It would have been a case for criminal prosecution under the hate laws. I would have been sued. And burned at the stake.

Take a look around you.

In Alberta a couple of years ago a small magazine publisher was roasted for complaining that the Hollywood film, The Last Temptation of Christ, was anti-Christian and blasphemous.

Jewish groups cried havoc. Supermarkets refused to carry the magazine. And the publisher went out of business.

But what’s this?

Here we have an American rabbi, Yechiel Eckstein, accusing Hollywood of “a very real and pervasive anti-Christian bias.”

A story to that effect was carried on the Ecumenical News International wire.

The rabbi belongs to the the Orthodox branch of the Jewish faith and is quoted as saying that in order to rectify the situation, Christians should put pressure on the film industry in the same way as pressure has been put on American tobacco firms.

Writing in the North Jersey Jewish Standard he said that Hollywood had gone out of its way to portray evangelical Protestants and devout Roman Catholics in the worst possible light.

“The cherished symbols of their faith are put to blasphemous use,” he declared.

“If there is a Christian character in a film, he is usually depicted as a fool, a liar, a cheat, a diabolical murderer, or a crazy person. And if such images are allowed to accumulate without a response they could prove detrimental to faith and to Christianity.”

I pointed out years ago that you never saw a movie out of Hollywood that featured a bad Jew. For Hollywood, there aren’t any bad Jews.

Not to mention that Christianity, thanks mainly to “minority” pressures, has become a no-no in our schools and that the Christian cross cannot be shown in some public places.

As for the rabbi, I guess it would be OK for him to say these thing even if they had human rights tribunals in the U.S., which they do not. Comment is protected by the First Amendment so he could not be dragged before one.

There’s something else. In many movies WASPS generally are depicted as being sinister.

You might think they were all members of the KKK. Mississipi Burning was such a film.

If you ask me, and I know you haven’t asked me, my comments were like kid’s pap compared with what some other people have said.

I guess it all depends on who your friends are. And what is “right” and what is “wrong” in the halls of political correctness.
———-

Forward to the Doug Collins book Here We Go Again! By Doug Collins

MuzzlingSpeech

Forward to the Doug Collins book Here We Go Again!
By Doug Collins
1998


“The purpose of human rights commissions is clear: it is to harass dissidence and throttle all serious attempts to fight political correctness. In other words, don’t question immigration or suggest that not all immigrants are equal, and don’t criticize the politics of the pressure groups, who have been handed a deadly weapon. Do ridicule traditional Canada and support the ills that liberal flesh is heir to. We must all subscribe to liberal thought. Or else!”

~ Doug Collins

It brings a blush to my battle-hardened hide, but frankness forces me to confess that in 1997 I became the most discussed columnist in the country, thanks to the Canadian Jewish Congress and other would-be censors. But it still puzzles me that my harmless offerings could create a national furore and, in British Columbia, a media feeding frenzy.

Such are the joys of political incorrectness. Only a few years ago, when men were men, and liberals, homosexuals and feminists did not rule the roost like so many squawking chickens, the columns in question would never have raised an eyebrow.

For such critics I was the serpent in the Garden of the Politically Correct Eden. Sleepwalkers in the major media nodded their heads like clockwork Barbie dolls as your correspondent was put through the grinder, describing me as an anti-Semite, a racist, a dork, and other terms popular with people who profess to hate hate.

The immediate cause of those fulminations was the column “Hollywood Propaganda”, published in 1994 in Vancouver’s North Shore News. It led over three years later to a five-week hearing before a “human rights” tribunal, the inquisitors believing, obviously but in this case mistakenly, that the longer a person is on the rack the louder will he repent.

In the eyes of the provincial government and the Jewish Congress the column was “hate literature”. But neither it nor anything else I have written has been, or ever could be, the subject of a criminal prosecution under the federal hate laws. That much was admitted by Lisa Mrozinski, a lawyer representing the government side. She stated that the need for proof makes it difficult to get anywhere with such complaints in the courts. The implication was that no proof is needed in the NDP’s Alice in Wonderland hearings, where words mean what the inquisitors want them to mean.

A complaint, in effect a charge, leads to a politically appointed one-person tribunal in which an“adjudicator” is judge, jury and prosecutor.

[Read more...]

CHRC: Abrams v Radical Press – Foreign Lobbyists By Fourhorses

Lib&Lobby Lib&Lobby
BBCanlogo

PROPAGANADA FROM B’NAI BRITH CANADA’S WEBSITE HOME PAGE:
Welcome to B’nai Brith Canada – Who we are? What we do?

B’nai Brith Canada is the independent voice of the Jewish community, representing its interests nationwide to government, NGO’s and the wider Canadian public.

Since 1875, it has been respected for its groundbreaking work on matters relating to antisemitism, racism and human rights, its strong advocacy on the pressing issues of the day….

Support B’nai Brith Canada

With the number of antisemitic incidents increasing almost threefold in the last five years, and a virtual explosion of internet hate fueling such anti-Jewish activity, the work of B’nai Brith Canada is more important than ever. Make your donation now.

———————
http://www.freedominion.com.pa/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=112629
CHRC: Abrams v Radical Press – Foreign Lobbyists

By Fourhorses

four_horses@warpmail.net

February 13th, 2009

In one of the correspondences from Arthur Topham, Publisher/Editor of the Radical Press, to Nancy Lafontant and Gregory M. Smith, Registrars at the CHRC, Topham raises the thought that Harry Abrams (complainant) is an agent for Israel’s Mossad. I think this is rather far fetched, especially after reading that Abrams is a business man in Victoria, who specializes in elevator advertising media. I haven’t seen any of his adverts in any elevators, so unless the Mossad is engaged in subliminal messaging to elevator guests, I would tend to heavily discount this theory.

This does raise a different issue, though. Part of the complaint claim is that the material Topham published at the Radical Press is likely to cause hatred towards Citizens of Israel. A poster on FD raised the question a while back as to what status does the State of Israel or its citizens have in Canadian judicial processes. That’s a very good question. It is not only the State of Israel, that is in question, but a bigger question pertaining to any foreign government. I understand there are diplomatic channels, procedures and protocols, and these are conducted through Foreign Affairs Canada and its diplomatic staff.

But what of this case?

There seem to be two complainants; Harry Abrams and B’nai Brith. How can they be complainants on behalf of Israeli citizens, which is the State of Israel? Are they registered lobbyists for a foreign government ?

[Read more...]

Dresden – A Real Holocaust & Act Of Terrorism

DresdenHolocaust

[Editor's Note: Today, February 13, 2009 marks the 64th Anniversary of what in reality is the greatest example of an actual "Holocaust" by fire to have ever been committed by humans against their fellow humans. It will stand forever as the most singular war crime of the 20th Century, yet to be exposed and addressed by humanity. It also stands, as I firmly believe now, as one of the best examples for why the Zionist Jews have used their media power and influence since that day to create the supposed "6 Million" "Jewish Holocaust" which the world now ignorantly believes to have happened and which serves to divert attention from the example of Dresden, one in which the Zionists played a crucial role in fomenting.]

http://www.rense.com/general85/de23.htm
Dresden – A Real Holocaust
& Act Of Terrorism
From 2-14-4

http://www.rense.com/general49/dres.htm
2-12-9

Once again we pause to remember…

Fifty-nine years ago, on the evening of February 13, 1945, an orgy of genocide and barbarism began against a defenseless German city, one of the greatest cultural centers of northern Europe. Within less than 14 hours, not only was it reduced to flaming ruins, but an estimated one-third of its inhabitants–possibly as many as half a million–had perished in what was the worst massacre of all time. As Americans continue to bemoan the loss of fewer than 3,000 at Larry Silverstein’s World Trade Center and the Pentagon as they themselves prepare to slaughter many times that number in an act of unprovoked aggression in Iraq, few know–less care–about the campaign of cold-blooded TERRORISM conducted against German civilians during World War II, culminating in the extermination of well over 300,000. The following account, taken from the Feb. 1985 issue of the NS Bulletin, tells us what a REAL holocaust is like.

Toward the end of World War II, as Allied planes rained death and destruction over Germany, the old Saxon city of Dresden lay like an island of tranquility amid desolation. Famous as a cultural center and possessing no military value, Dresden had been spared the terror that descended from the skies over the rest of the country.

In fact, little had been done to provide the ancient city of artists and craftsmen with anti-aircraft defenses. One squadron of planes had been stationed in Dresden for awhile, but the Luftwaffe decided to move the aircraft to another area where they would be of use. A gentlemen’s agreement seemed to prevail, designating Dresden an “open city.”

On Shrove Tuesday, February 13, 1945, a flood of refugees fleeing the Red Army 60 miles away had swollen the city’s population to well over a million. Each new refugee brought fearful accounts of Soviet atrocities. Little did those refugees retreating from the Red terror imagine that they were about to die in a horror worse than anything Stalin could devise.

[Read more...]

GETTING READY TO SLAY CENSORSHIP

SmokeyFrSpeechHatLaws

GETTING READY TO SLAY CENSORSHIP

By Doug Collins
May 18th, 1997

From the North Shore News

That was the Week That Was. Coast to coast coverage. Plus long interviews with the Christian Science Monitor and The Daily Telegraph.  Perhaps Canada will wake up to the fact that the forces of censorship are a bit more dangerous than I am.

The Globe & Mail put the story on its front page [after my prosecution under the Human Rights Act was announced] and published an editorial headed “B.C.’s Gag Law,” in which it stated:

“The quality of his views is not the issue; his right to express them is. It is an inherent right. This presumptuous B.C. Legislation should be struck down by the courts….”.

Southam correspondent Ian Haysom sent a balanced account of this farce and fracas to the Southam papers. The headline in the Edmonton Journal was: “Does free speech give free rein?”

It should, but doesn’t. And won’t until this Jewish Congress attack on free speech is smashed. Will the courts be so bold? Who knows? This is Canada, not the U.S.

At the “tribunals” (lovely word) a multicult law professor by the name of Nitya Lyer is in charge. Gordon Watson the anti-abortionist says she is an NDP insider who helped to write the controversial “bubble law” that prevents demonstrators from getting too close to abortion clinics.

Freedom of speech is OK at a distance!

[Read more...]

Conspiring with the Commissars: RadicalPress.com teleconference #1 for Feb. 6, 2009

CHRCartoon

Conspiring with the Commissars: RadicalPress.com teleconference #1 for Feb. 6, 2009

By Arthur Topham
Publisher & Editor
RadicalPress.com

February 11, 2009

“Have a nice night. The dawn will be a long time coming.”
-Doug Collins, from his North Shore News column
of Jan. 12, 1997, “A Bigger and Better Big Brother”.

Teleconferencing is a new experience for me. Never having been a member of any bureaucratic organization of government (other than a professional school teacher for a number of years) the opportunity just never arose before – at least not until Harry Abrams and the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada decided to add me to their hit list of alleged purveyors of hate literature which resulted in a complaint being filed with the Canadian Human Rights Commission – one that I first became aware of back on November 20th, 2007 after receiving a copy of the complaint in an unmarked, unregistered envelope in my rural mailbox.

Fourteen months later I find myself dialing the toll-free number 1-866-646-2080 at five minutes to eleven am PST. The call to Ottawa’s Star Chamber head office, officially known as the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal, was conveniently set for 2 pm EST. Like most things political in Canada it seems that Ontario is the center of the universe and satellites such as B.C. must beam their signals eastward to be acknowledged and dealt with.

But then Harry Abrams, who resides in B.C. (in Victoria) also had to be up and about and ready to rock and roll by 11 am so from that angle we were both in the same leaky boat.

Those “In Attendance” for the discussions were the following:

Karen Jensen, Tribunal Member
Harry Abrams, Complainant
Anita Bromberg, Representative for League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith* [Canada]
Daniel Poulin, Canadian Human Rights Commission Counsel
Arthur Topham, Respondent
Nancy Lafontant, Registry Officer

Harry’s and BB’s lawyer apparently was also scheduled to attend but didn’t show up.

Karen Jensen chaired the discussions and informed listeners that this would be the first case management plan “of about three” on the matter in order to get ready for the upcoming hearing. To prepare for the blessed event it would be necessary to plow through a number of pre-arranged protocols which included:

1  Finding out if either parties would have legal representation.

2  What language would be used.

3  Identification of any preliminary matters.

4  Disclosure of documents, etc. including dates for the filing of parties’ Statements of Particulars, witness disclosure, documentary disclosure and expert reports.

5  The possibility of an Agreed Statement of Facts (that one brought a chuckle to my mind as it likely did to Harry’s).

6  The proposed venue for the hearing.

7  Other matters/special needs.

8  And finally scheduling the next conference call.

Much of it all was mundane. Kind of like sitting through a tutorial at the end of a long day of summer classes listening to the droning voice of the instructor outlining the various phases of  the next essay due on a particular date. But, thanks to fate and Harry and others, some of it was mildly amusing and in an odd sort of way instructive. Hopefully others can learn from what I’m going to report here.

Ever since this “Human Rights” charade, masquerading as some form of “justice” for minorities – particularly those of Zionist Jewish persuasion here in Canada – caught me up in its web of intrigue and entrapment, I’ve thought a lot about this fellow Harry Abrams, wondered, intensely at times, just how the wheels and gears moved inside his head. Part of that process included considering the sound of his voice. You see Harry and I have had little contact other than when he slithered rather surreptitiously out of cyberspace and onto my  computer screen back on February 12th of 2007 hiding his true identity then behind the alias now known as “Brian Esker”.

Now, almost to the day, I finally heard Harry’s voice in real time. I had expected it to be somewhat deep and coarse and sharp and abrupt, kinda like the terse little emails he’d sent me for a Valentine’s Day present in 2007 demanding that I remove articles from my website that he found “offensive” to his literary tastes.

As Harry put it then, “I am writing to notify you of unacceptably racist material posted on your website at radicalpress.com,” See http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=380

He was referring to an article that I had posted titled, “Trapping Wiesel’s and Other Rodents”. It was by another writer about the famous holocaust propagandist Elie Wiesel but the title was mine. You know, the fellow some people refer to as the “Pope of the Holocaust Religion”; one of the countless “Holocaust Survivors”, Nobel Peace Prize winner, and most recently, “Knight of the British Empire” who my recently acquired mentor Doug Collins aptly described in one of his columns, “History and Jack in the Beanstalk” back in December of 1988.

[Read more...]

Open letter to UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon by Angie Tibbs

GazaTanksZios

http://www.redress.cc/global/atibbs20090209#atibbs20090209_bio
Open letter to UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon

By Angie Tibbs

9 February 2009

Dear Mr Secretary-General,

Angie Tibbs asks UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon http://www.un.org/sg/  to explain the double standards that allow him to condemn the Palestinians’ legally-enshrined right to self-defence while delivering a mild slap on the wrist to Israel for its war crimes in Gaza.
The United Nations, the world’s preeminent law-making body, together with its Charter, provides the basis for laws and principles; therefore, people of conscience everywhere look to the UN with hope for upholding its Charter and its pledge to end the scourge of war.  As the secretary-general, you, sir, are expected to at least speak words that honour this Charter and its principles.

However, while people of good conscience world-wide are expressing revulsion at Israel’s terrorist attack on the defenceless in Gaza, you are already seeking to minimize war crimes of monumental proportions while echoing the disinformation of Israel and its supporters.

For instance, on 16 January 2009 the headlines read http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=29567&Cr=gaza : “Ban urges unilateral ceasefire in Gaza conflict; meets with Palestine leaders”.

You did not meet with “Palestinian leaders”, sir. Palestinian leaders are either detained in Israeli or West Bank prisons, murdered by Israeli assassins, or in Gaza, where the world, in its sick attempts to placate Israel, refused to allow them to govern the people who elected them.

You met with traitors, the Palestinian Authority, whose party, Fatah, decisively lost the January 2006 election, yet they refused to go quietly or to work with the people’s representatives. And here you are giving credence to Judas Abbas and his sick collusion with the killers of the Palestinian people, declaring with unbridled audacity, that you “underscore your full support for President Abbas’s leadership”.

[Read more...]