Lisbon And The Zionist Nightmare

By Mike James in Germany – 8 November 2009

You make me laugh. You make me cry. You are fighters. You are natural-born rebels. You are my people.

You are, by virtue of your Anglo-Saxon, Celtic, Frankish, Teutonic, Alpine, Old Mediterranean and Scandinavian ancestry, one whole bunch of contentious, argumentative, reactionary, swing-a-fist after one too many beers, sons of proverbial bitches.

You are the scum of the earth. You are an utter disgrace.

You are largely ignorant, dumbed-down, manipulated, deceived, naive, easily duped by The International Tribe and their grotesque quasi-religious fables and their International Money System.

But you are heroes. And I love you.

Upon the burden sufficient to the strength of your shoulders, all things depend.

(more…)

On behalf of my lovely wife Shastah and myself I want to take this moment to thank everyone who made our trip to the 24th annual George Orwell dinner in Victoria, B.C. a reality.

Travel from our relatively remote area of the province to the island is expensive and it was only due to the generosity of those who donated funds that we were able to attend this important gathering of free speech advocates from across Canada.

This was the second time that we were able to enjoy the fellowship of people on the front lines of those fighting to retain the right to speak out their truths in the face of a brutal and alarmingly dangerous force: the government of Canada and its bureaucratic agent known as the Canadian Human Rights Commission (CHRC).

Due to time restrictions at the moment I cannot elaborate on the meeting but will do so over the next while.

Arthur Topham

Pub/Ed

RadicalPress.com

[Editor’s Note: Elizabeth Dilling, all things considered, was a prophetess in her own time. Her various works, which include her exposure of the Zionist Jewish infiltration of the United States of America and her analysis of Bolshevism, Communism and Zionism as one Beast with numerous names, are a testament to her courage and her foresight in revealing the truth during a period of American history when to speak out was to risk the inevitable attacks by the Jewish establishment. Groups like the American Jewish Congress and B’nai Brith International and their attack-dog the Anti-Defamation League, were always ready and willing to vilify anyone who dared to speak out about their plans to implement their one world government and Elizabeth Dilling was forced to deal with their Talmudic tactics from the moment she picked up the sword of truth.

Foreword

Elizabeth Dilling Stokes was born, raised, and educated in Chicago. After attending the University of Chicago she married, and for many years devoted her life to her children, social activities on the North Shore of Chicago, and being a concert harpist. After hearing of the great “humanitarian experiment” in Soviet Russia, she traveled there in 1931, and was able to go behind the scenes. She was shocked at the forced labor, the squalid living quarters, and deplorable living conditions, and the atmosphere of fear created by the Soviet dictatorship.

She was most shocked by the virulent anti-Christianity of the atheist Communist regime.

Following her return to the United States she lectured and wrote about what she had seen, realizing from the opposition which immediately arose that a substantial Marxist movement was active in the United States.  In 1934 her first book The Red Network was published, an expose of the persons and organizations furthering Red causes in the United States.   In 1936, her second book, The Roosevelt Red Record and Its Background, was published.

Almost immediately after these books were published, she was attacked as “anti-semitic,” although she had actually offered her anti-Communist services to Jewish organizations, and knew nothing of organized Jewish involvement in the Marxist movement.  After researching and studying, however, in 1940 she published her third book The Octopus, which dealt with these subjects.

After World War II commenced, Mrs. Dilling became convinced that, despite President Roosevelt’s protestations that not one American boy would ever again fight on foreign soil, there was a movement afoot to involve the United States, with the result that a substantial part of the world would be communized later.

In 1941, she led a Mother’s March on Washington to oppose the “Lend Lease” bill, proclaimed to help keep us out of war by its sponsors, but proving the last step for our involvement.  The bill passed by only one vote.  A few months later, the United States went to war.

In 1944, Mrs. Dilling’s views involved her in the now infamous mass “sedition” trial.  The case was ultimately dismissed  by a Federal Court as “a travesty on justice.”

She was later remarried to Jeremiah Stokes, a Christian anti-Communist writer, and she continued to write and lecture in behalf of Christianity and Constitutional Americanism, first publishing this book in 1964.
(more…)

Thought Makes You Free In the EU [and Canada]
by Bernhard Schaub

The world is in flux. The financial crisis has shattered our too-blind faith in the regnant economic and political system. The good in this crisis: it makes you think. Many realize that the remedies proposed by government are no remedies at all, but merely measures intended to keep the existing system alive. The idea is spreading that the whole thing in reality is a giant redistribution intended to concentrate money and power into even fewer hands than before. It is high time to end our unquestioning ways with some serious thought.

The present economic system-like all systems-rests on certain axioms, certain underpinnings, that cannot be disturbed without putting the entire edifice into danger of collapse. Such underpinnings are for that reason always sacrosanct.

He who wishes to be accepted, or even merely tolerated in our society does well to acknowledge, or at least not to openly dispute, certain core beliefs: To these belong devotion to the free market, including debt financing and the independence of the banking system, to so-called parliamentary democracy, including the attendant two-party system, devotion to philo-semitism, multiculturalism, homosexuality, and abortion together with the highest praises for the civil rights to which one considers oneself entitled.

It is even permitted to belong to whatever religion or philosophy one might wish to-but subject to the unstated condition that one doesn’t really take it seriously. Otherwise, one acquires very quickly the odor of fundamentalism.

In today’s political and cultural landscape, a fundamentalist is anyone who holds his Catholic, or Evangelical, or Islamic, or national-or whatever feelings of any kind-above those highest of values enumerated above. Therefore, fundamentalists cannot be tolerated under the global New World Order that is the central theme of American politics. It is only a very slight distance that separates the fundamentalist from the charge of  being a terrorist. And it is not necessary here to spell out what sort of treatment awaits terrorists. That has been ordained by 9/11.

The thoughtful European notes with puzzlement that the proscriptions set forth by Political Correctness and monitored by the culture and the law grow more numerous every day. The citizen is condemned to silence by all manner of gag laws and cowed by the looming threat of the EU criminal code because he no longer knows what is punishable, nor why, nor where. Lately, we’re told, nearly 14,000 “rights violations”-whatever those might be-were committed in Germany in 2008, of which fully 700 were violent. Therefore, there remain from these numbers about 13,000 nonviolent “rights violations.” This is notable, especially in light of the incessant reminders by self-righteous German politicians to China and other countries to “uphold civil rights.” Obviously, the sacred rights of freedom of expression, academic freedom, religious or philosophical belief, etc., are valid only so long as they don’t oppose any of the listed Canons of Western Values.

Catch-22

Here is a Catch-22. It is profoundly disingenuous, not to say outright mendacious: an easily seen-through maneuver for the benefit of the ruling elites of the West.

The greatest taboo of Western propriety, however, is of a historical nature. That is, where the matter has to do with Nazism or the so-called Third Reich, contemporary thought abdicates completely. The brain is relieved of its function, and quasi-religious reflexes take over. All powers of discernment cease, any inquiry into the Holy Writ is thought inappropriate, even malign. Here there is only one viewpoint allowed: the Nazis-read, the Germans-are perpetrators, and exclusively that, and the Jews are victims, and innately and eternally, no less. The uproar about Erika Steinbach, Eva Herrmann, Martin Hohmann, and General Günzel serves to illustrate. Whoever doubts these supreme tenets of belief is no longer a discussion partner, but instead a leper and a heretic rolled into one, subjected instantly to inquisitorial judgment, ostracism, and economic destruction. And everyone who has anything to do with such a person must immediately distance himself.

This goes double for questions concerning the Holocaust, the inner circle of this minefield. The never-ending rumble of the media concerning Bishop Richard Williamson has brought this taboo to the fore once again. Mrs. Merkel feels called upon to instruct the Pope; the Pope feels called upon to call Bishop Williamson to account; the attorney general of Regensburg proposes, and the Justice Department considers issuing, an international arrest warrant for the churchman-and why? Because he judges a historical matter differently from the way it is usually and permitted to do. This constitutes heresy. This means nothing else than that a historical event has been removed from the domain of scholarship and with that, of reasoned discussion, and elevated into the domain of religion, and indeed a kind of world religion that in Germany has unbeknownst acquired the standing of a half-official state religion.

Bishop Richard Williamson

As the media campaign against Bishop Williamson rose to a fever pitch, the revisionist and lawyer Horst Mahler was sentenced in Munich to six years imprisonment and at the same time in Potsdam to four more years, because he questioned details of the Holocaust. In 2007, Mahler’s partner, lawyer Sylvia Stolz, was sentenced to 3 1/2 years’ imprisonment and escorted directly to jail from the courtroom. The reason: she defended the German-Canadian publicist Ernst Zündel in court in Mannheim and took the position that the accused was right, or at least that he was exercising his right to a dissenting opinion. Zündel himself got five years. Two years’ investigatory detention under the most dubious circumstances in Canada didn’t count. So Zündel does seven years because he published arguments over his Internet site concerning the historical thesis of the “mass gassing” of Jews.

Lawyer Sylvia Stolz and Revisionist and lawyer Horst Mahler

Shortly after Zündel, the chemist and multi-book author Germar Rudolf, originally a scientist at the Max Planck Institute in Stuttgart, received a sentence of 2 1/2 years because it was possible to arrive at the same conclusions from his neutral, scientific investigations in forensic chemistry as had been arrived at by other routes by earlier researchers.

  Scientist Germar Rudolf

The Frenchman Robert Faurisson, university professor for documentary research and textual analysis at the Sorbonne in Paris has been subjected to multiple fines of astronomic amounts, and has sustained bodily injuries from a beating administered by unidentified assailants.

Robert Faurisson-French Revisionist

One of the best-known revisionist researchers and writers is the Swiss Romanist and Scandinavist Jürgen Graf, sentenced to 15 months’ imprisonment by a Swiss court for questioning the holocaust hypothesis. He was able to avoid this imprisonment only by flight into exile.

Also in exile is the Belgian father of seven Vincent Reynouard. In Austria, court-expert-witness-engineer Wolfgang Fröhlich is in jail for the second time because he does not accept the official version of the holocaust.

Where is Amnesty International?

Where is Amnesty International? Where the European Court of Human Rights? Where the hue and cry of the media? Where the student protests? Where the Church?

All these men and women and many others, such as Ursula Haverbeck, Dr. Udo Walendy, Gerd Honsik, Dr. Max Wahl, Siegfried Verbeke, Gaston Amaudruz, have committed no offense other than to have arrived at conclusions from their research and analysis that diverge from the official account-and that they then addressed pointed questions to those who have promulgated the putative falsehoods around the world.

It is the pride of western science, since the Renaissance, and in particular since the Enlightenment, to allow nothing to be sacrosanct, and to accept nothing short of absolute objectivity. Revisionism-that is, discernment, confirmation, questioning-is a basic principle of science. All else is dogmatism. Science cannot admit of religious, political, or other social exceptions. In the sense of the natural sciences, there is no Christian reality nor Unchristian reality, no moral nor immoral fact. The scientist has the right to err, since no one is in possession of the absolute truth. Natural science has banished the medieval age of superstition with the age of reason.

As applied to research into the Holocaust, this means: it may not be clouded by philo-Semitic nor by anti-Semitic inclinations, any more than it may be by Germanophilic or Germanophobic. Whether one likes the Jews or the Germans, or dislikes them is no factor in research, and may not affect it in any way.

Ms Merkel said in her message to Pope Benedict XVI, “There may be no denial of the Holocaust.” What does this mean, there may not be? Does it mean that “denial” presupposes that someone advances lies while knowing better? This certainly doesn’t apply to the revisionists, who are convinced of their interpretations. Or does it mean that here, after all-trumping all factual inquiry-global political forces are  in play to which both the German head of state as well as the leader of Christianity must bow?

There is commentary that implies something pretty close to these conjectures. As early as May 1979, Professor William Rubinstein of the University of Melbourne, Australia, wrote in the Nation Review, “Were the Holocaust shown to be a hoax, the Number One weapon in Israel’s propaganda armory disappears.”

And after the lecturer and revisonist Günther Deckert was sentenced to years in jail, the  Frankfurter Allgemeine wrote on August 15, 1994, “If Deckert’s account of the Holocaust were correct, the Federal Republic of Germany would be founded upon a lie.” Every presidential address, every “moment of silence,” every history book would have lied. In that he denies the murder of the Jews, he contests the very legitimacy of the German Federal Republic.

The Canadian B’nai B’rith

But it seems that there are even higher matters at stake: the memory of the Holocaust is central to the erection of the new world order. So wrote Ian J. Kagedan, the Director of the Canadian B’nai B’rith in the Toronto Star for November 26, 1991.

These unseemly newspaper announcements enable us to understand why finally the effort to exhume the claimed victims and properly to account for them has not been undertaken; why Ms Merkel has not called an international Holocaust conference in Berlin and subjected the assertions of the revisionists to a public discussion and critique. With that, the sorry matter would once and for all be placed on the table and the “pseudoscientific bumbling” of the Holocaust deniers would be laid bare for all to see-and indeed by scientists, not just journalists. But therein, of course, argument and counter-argument would have to be heard.

Why can’t this be? Is it feared that such a discussion might produce results other than those that are politically desired? Is this why the revisionists languish in jail? Is this why their books are banned? Is the public to be denied the means of evaluating the state of the revisionist arguments?

The reason for this remarkable scientific regression appears to be the same as the reason for the judicial regression in the courtroom. Here also the established practice-which ashamedly is never admitted in public-that there is never inquiry into whether the accused might be right. Evidence is not taken, and if the accused should try to explain his position, he subjects himself to still further charges, and his attorney as well! A judicial monstrosity. The factuality of genocide of millions in gas chambers is simply declared “given,” and the court has merely to decide whether the defendant has contradicted this given - and then to arrive at a sentence. A historical assumption is thereby peremptorily raised to the status of a universally known and proven law of nature - and at the same time, factual confirmation of it is forbidden!

Who’s Afraid of the Big Bad Truth?

Is somebody afraid of the truth here?

The voices are becoming more numerous that advocate breaking the silence over this: in 2007, Professor Karl Albert Schachtschneider, professor of public inquiry at the University of Erlangen, spoke on the Constitution of the European Union. He took a question from the audience, “Do we have freedom of speech here?” He answered: “A country in which free speech is constrained by severe punishments  is not a free country. The immortal Kant said about freedom of speech that one must be free to say anything, whether it is true or untrue. With the Holocaust, anything might be true or not true; I wasn’t there. But another reason I don’t discuss it,  is that it is forbidden. One is not allowed to dispute it, not even scientifically. The prohibition on “agitation” prevents it. This is not a free country.”

If the “new world order” that the Canadian gentleman from B’nai B’rith mentioned might be in some way identical with that financial system that currently has thrown the world into the grips of an unprecedented crisis, it might in any case be appropriate to examine the central historical and philosophical foundations of that new order somewhat more closely.

“Where everyone condemns, one must prove. Where everyone praises, as well.”  Thought makes you free!

=====
The publicist and lecturer Bernhard Schaub (Dornach bei Basel), publisher of this newsletter, is Swiss. He was a teacher of German and history at Waldorf Schools  until he was dismissed in 1993 for publishing a book in which he cited objective research into the Holocaust. He also lost a later position as academic dean of an adult-education school for similar reasons. In 2006 he participated in the Holocaust Conference called in Tehran by President Ahmedinejad.

Mary and Child - a 1913 oil painting by Adolf Hitler
_______________________________________________________________________

From: Phishna phishna@yahoo.com
“The stupid Christians can’t seem to figure out the “Antichrist” has to be a Jew or Jew-tool like Bush-Obama because the Jews hate Christianity.”

Dear Phishna,

Normally, after about three days or so, “phish” begin to take on a peculiar odour that most find offensive. In your case, due to you and I being co-joined in a certain sense by email connections with similar lists, I find that every so often I’m confronted with your malodorous and ignorant little tantrums regarding those who have consciously accepted Jesus Christ as their spiritual representation of what ideally can be were the world not permeated and torn asunder by the likes of those who we now recognize as the synagogue of satan or in atheist terminology, Zionists.

What likely stinks the most about your short-sighted, puerile little bursts of venomous hatred and contempt for the Christos is your assumed attitude that Christians haven’t figured out who or what is represented by that term “Anti-Christ.” Why you would even go there at this stage of the game, given the ample volume of critiques that exist on the net regarding this situation, is beyond me. But what it does indicate is that you, and not the Christians, are the one with deep-seated issues as may pertain to questions of spirituality and its application to the wonderful world of political intrigue.

I would be the first person to admit that there are a substantial number of Christians who have succumbed to the Zionist subterfuge that’s been ongoing in the West since at least the 16th Century. If any religious group were subjected to such a long term assault by a seditious and ungodly group of sadistic psychopaths enjoying and exploiting the advantages endless supplies of coin and all which that implies in terms of economic, social, and political influence, I’m sure that after four hundred years of serious infiltration there would be a decidedly and marked impression made upon the host subject, and respecting the Christians this has obviously been the case.

But your seemingly endless frothing and condemnation belies more than what your readers might think or see upon the surface of such slander and begs the question of why you would be motivated to add to the already voluminous amount of invective aimed at those who perceive the Light of the Christos as one which gives the world a good and positive ideal or image to ground itself upon in times of deep and troubling strife and suffering by countless millions around the globe.

Whenever I witness your vituperative sarcasm, bordering I sense on what can only be construed as a mild, yet illustrative example of sadism in this regard, my immediate reaction is to think of you as just one more agents provocateur of the Zionist Jew cartel of bullshitters and deceivers out to denigrate and ultimately destroy one of the two main spiritual forces on this planet that have been resisting these vipers for the past two thousand years.

Do you do likewise regarding the Muslims and Mohammed as well?, for it is they too who, at this moment in our collective history, are the main force resisting this onslaught of Zionist megalomania and pathology and the only other major religion that acknowledges the divinity and greatness of the Christ and his Mother Mary.

It took me personally close to sixty years of searching and investigating practically every spiritual path known to man to eventually settle upon one faith or belief system that met the basic prerequisites that I wanted: peace, harmony, brother/sisterhood, gentleness, love, honesty, joyfulness, kindness toward all sentient beings, humbleness and meekness in the face of a Creator whose magnanimity you have yet to realize. You fail, throughout all of your pissing and moaning about the Christians, to recognize that it was Jesus Christ who first stood up to the Pharisaic/Talmudic/Zionist mindset. It was He and those who shared a like consciousness of the holy, who initially exemplified the willingness to resist, as all freedom-fighters resist, the significant and ominous actions of the Sanhedrin even at that nascent point in our collective, historic struggle with the forces of darkness and evil.

It needs to be asked, as in all examples such as this, who ultimately benefits from your malignant and malodorous bad-mouthing, other than those you and your ilk, in all your combined naivety, also profess to be the force to be most reckoned with?

The endless debating over whether or not Jesus Christ “really” existed is not only a useless waste of time and effort but also a ruse, initiated by the very forces you profess to be at odds with. The Christos – whether that state of God consciousness exists in the flesh or not and contrary to all of your simplistic and misinformed rhetoric – is irrelevant. What is relevant is that it symbolizes Love, Truth and Peace and therefore provides those of us who understand this fundamental principle with ample reason to continue on in this seemingly endless struggle to achieve justice and harmony in this world.

May you be blessed with such an understanding some day and then…

Shine your Light for Love, Peace & Justice for All.

Arthur Topham
Publisher/Editor
The Radical Press
Canada’s Radical News Network
“Digging to the root of the issues since 1998″
http://www.radicalpress.com
radical@radicalpress.com
—————————–

September 5, 2009

FROM THE EDITOR’S DESK:

RADICAL EDITOR & PUBLISHER ARTHUR TOPHAM
__________________________________________________

Dear Radical Reader,

The recent and still very provocative ruling by Canadian Human Rights Tribunal Member Athanasios Hadjis on September 2, 2009, (the Lemire Decision) – one that holds great promise of finally bringing down the massive house of cards better known as the Canadian Human Rights Commission – has finally freed up at least one of countless mainstream media online news service agencies, allowing them the much needed freedom to give some long sought coverage to the CHRC’s “hate crime” complaint case involving Harry Abrams and the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada v. Arthur Topham and RadicalPress.com.

As the Editor and Publisher of RadicalPress.com I must gratefully and gleefully take off my hat to Merv Richie, publisher and owner of the Terrace Daily.ca, an online news service located in the northwestern community of Terrace, British Columbia, Canada and extend a firm handshake to him and say thank you for having both the wisdom and the courage to do what the rest of Canada’s supposedly independent and objective news media should have done two years ago when this controversial case first became public.

I had long hoped that my own community newspaper, the Quesnel Cariboo Observer, would have been the one to have broke the story but after initially covering the issue back in early 2008 they were immediately silenced by a false threat of a law suit from the very personage who now appears to have lost his case against against Marc Lemire in this outstanding ruling – none other than Richard Warman, good friend of Harry Abrams the Complainant who laid the infamous sec. 13(1) “hate crime” charge against myself and my website back in July of 2007.

While this important ruling is the first major step in the eventual dismantling of this quasi-judicial internal censorship syndicate created by the Zionist lobby groups currently permeating all aspects of Canadian government, industry, media and academia it isn’t the final end for this vile, draconian sec. 13(1) anti-free speech law. As I recently wrote to one email correspondent regarding this issue, “When one is dealing with a deadly serpent it’s best not to take your attention off it until its head is severed from its body. In my case the head of this viper is still very much intact.”

Mr. Merv Richie has done a great service for everyone who believes in our Charter rights to freedom of expression and freedom of the press and he deserves a round of applause and encouragement for his willingness to put his shoulder to wheel at a time when this vehicle of expression is only just beginning to budge out from the Stalinist rut it’s been stuck in for the past twenty odd years. Please do write to him and thank him and pass this article to all you can.

Shine your Light for Love, Peace & Justice for All,

Arthur Topham
Publisher/Editor
The Radical Press
Canada’s Radical News Network
“Digging to the root of the issues since 1998″
http://www.radicalpress.com
radical@radicalpress.com
——————————

http://www.terracedaily.ca/show4688a/STUNNING_VICTORY_FOR_FREEDOM_OF_SPEECH
STUNNING VICTORY FOR FREEDOM OF SPEECH
by Merv Ritchie

2nd September 2009

This morning a new light shines across Canada. The Canadian Human Rights Tribunal (CHRT) has had its fangs trimmed. Section 13, the law that prohibits speaking openly about uncomfortable truths has finally been defeated. Commonly referred to as the anti hate law it has been used to stifle criticism of policy and ideology on almost every medium. The first use of the law was to force a man, John Ross Taylor, to stop using his own personal telephone answering machine to leave messages for people that wanted to call in and hear what he had to say. Generally his thoughts were against Canada’s immigration laws. The latest use of the law was to charge a man, Marc Lemire, who ran an internet chat forum. Although he did not approve postings to the message board (it was an open message forum) he was held to account for what others posted.

A BC website (operated by a former Kitimat native) is also currently under indictment by the CHRT for criticizing an ultra right wing faction of Israeli/Jewish politics called Zionists. Many do not like Arthur Topham’s blunt, unorthodox, politically incorrect writings on his website, Radicalpress.com, however he provides evidence and background to back up everything he writes. Truth is not a defence against the CHRT as every person and organization that has come under their radar has discovered, as they all were convicted. That is a 100 percent prosecutorial success rate, a rate unheard of anywhere in the world except in this secretive organization that has recently been investigated by the RCMP.

In his decision Athanasios D. Hadjis set a very high bar for new prosecutions under this act. Only the most vile and alarmist writings should be considered for prosecutions and the Charter of Rights and Freedoms protects Canadians, allows Canadians, to discuss issues that are not politically correct. The conclusion is as follows;

V. CONCLUSION
I have determined that Mr. Lemire contravened s. 13 of the Act in only one of the instances alleged by Mr. Warman, namely the AIDS Secrets article. However, I have also concluded that s. 13(1) in conjunction with ss. 54(1) and (1.1) are inconsistent with s. 2(b) of the Charter, which guarantees the freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression. The restriction imposed by these provisions is not a reasonable limit within the meaning of s. 1 of the Charter. Since a formal declaration of invalidity is not a remedy available to the Tribunal (see Cuddy Chicks Ltd. V. Ontario (Labour Relations Board), [1991] 2 S.C.R. 5), I will simply refuse to apply these provisions for the purposes of the complaint against Mr. Lemire and I will not issue any remedial order against him (see Nova Scotia (Workers’ Compensation Board) v. Martin, 2003 SCC 54 at paras. 26-7).

His comments on the AIDS Secret article in part are as follows;

In my view, the material found in the AIDS Secrets article expresses unusually strong and deep-felt emotions of detestation and vilification towards homosexuals in particular. The article is rife with hyperbole and moral condemnation. Homosexuals, and Blacks to a lesser extent, are denigrated as purveyors of a “killer” that is on the loose, agonizingly destroying the lives of American children and adults alike. Extreme language is used to vilify them and their lifestyles. They are portrayed as a powerful force that is conspiring to bring harm to others. Rather than using the statistics and studies in a dispassionately scientific manner, the article adopts an alarmist, almost hysteric tone, which along the above mentioned characterizations, is likely to expose them to hatred or contempt.

This is a very dramatic shift in the manner in which Canadians might discuss issues. It allows for a much greater freedom to engage in discussions. It also has very profound impacts on internet websites and forums.

Although Mr. Lemire did not compose the AIDS Secrets article he allowed it to be posted on his website and therefore was found responsible for distributing this material.

The conclusion found Section 13 to be at odds with the Charter of Rights. The next few weeks and months will determine the future of the CHRT. It has caused much grief for many individuals who wanted to expose some knowledge they discovered to the general public. Today a fresh wind of freedom to speak out has blown across Canada.
———–

Also see the following: Two of your articles are posted on our site here. Merv.

http://www.terracedaily.ca/show13s/PROVOCATIVE

—————–

Arthur Topham is the Publisher and Editor of RadicalPress.com. He is currently involved in a free speech battle with the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada.

He is also in extremely dire need of financial support to sustain this battle with the forces of repression and censorship as he is not able to work during this period of intense litigation with the Canadian Human Rights Commission and the CHR Tribunal. Any donations therefore would be most welcome. Please see the following url on the Home Page (upper right hand corner) http://www.radicalpress.com/?page_id=657 regarding donations. Also there is a “DONATE” button there for Paypal or here at https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=4466120 . Feel free to use any of them if you can help out. Thanks.

Arthur welcomes all feedback to his articles and can be reached at radical@radicalpress.com .

For the Full Monty on the complaint case involving RadicalPress.com and B’nai Brith Canada please see: http://www.radicalpress.com/?page_id=995

Is Your Government Breeding Bolsheviks?
B’nai Brith’s brazen attempt to hardwire Hatred and Censorship into the Canadian Psyche

By Arthur Topham

August 8, 2009

In his 2006 book, The Synagogue of Satan, the British writer Andrew C. Hitchcock has a lot to say about the house of Rothschild. In fact his book is a revelation of our times; the chronology of a crime syndicate that began in 1760 when Mayer Amschel Bauer took over his father’s money lending business in Frankfurt, Germany and changed his name from Bauer to Rothschild, a German word meaning “Red Shield” and hung the symbolic hexagram that now adorns the Israeli flag above his door.

The last 250 years is basically a record of the Rothschild’s devastating effects upon the people and the planet; one that has now brought our 20th Century civilization to the brink of either global disaster, or, should we awake in time to this imminent end and act accordingly, the final dismantling and dissolution of this infamous house of hell that’s been the root cause of humanity’s discontent for the past two and a half centuries.

Andrew Hitchcock’s book[1] in some respects parallel’s the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion in that it too is a road map like the Protocols only one that can lead us out of the wasteland of the present times rather than further into a gloomy and foreboding Big Brother future such as the Protocols reveal.

While Hitchcock’s first and foremost purpose is to document the accomplished deeds of this Rothschild house of horror as they pertain to global finance, politics and media, his particular expose of the secret masonic society of B’nai Brith, one of the many Rothschild enterprises designed to assist in its agenda for world domination, should be of special interest to Canadians; especially those Canadians who have managed to break free to some degree from the mind-numbing influence of the Rothschild controlled mainstream media and are relatively able to view, somewhat objectively, the ongoing machinations of this organization; one initially set up and funded in order to present to the world a viewpoint fundamentally Talmudic, cabalistic and atheistic in scope, nature and purpose.

In the USA when Americans think of B’nai Brith they automatically think of the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) the now powerful, aggressive arm of B’nai Brith International originally formed in 1913 by the Rothschild Jews in reaction to a Jewish business man who was convicted of raping and murdering one of his young employees and actually put in jail for his crime.* This was considered an outrage by the then nascent Zionists and so they conspired to come up with an organization that would eventually become the Goliath of gutter journalism, spewing forth volumes of vituperative slander and malignant lies upon any individual, group or organization that ever dared to challenge the tendentious tenets of the Rothschild empire.

I believe Noam Chomsky, Professor of Linguistics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, put it rather succinctly when he once described the ADL as “…one of the ugliest, most powerful pressure groups in the U.S…. Its primary commitment is to use any technique, however dishonest and disgraceful, in order to defame and silence and destroy anybody who dares to criticize the Holy State (’Israel’).”

(more…)

DUST COVER FROM ELIZABETH DILLING’S 1936 BOOK EXPOSING ROOSEVELT
__________________________________________________________________________

The Managers, The Messiahs and the Masses

By Douglas Reed

From: The Controversy of Zion, Chapter 37

Amid jubilant scenes in Washington and Berlin on two successive days (March 4 and 5, 1933) the two twelve-year reigns began which were to end at almost the same instant in 1945. Today an impartial historian could hardly compute which reign produced the greater sum of human suffering. At the start the two men who appeared on the central scene were both hailed as Messiahs. In America a Rabbi Rosenblum described President Roosevelt as “a Godlike messenger, the darling of destiny, the Messiah of America’s tomorrow”; there spoke a political flatterer in words intended to “persuade the multitude”. In 1937, in Prague menaced by Hitler, a Jewish acquaintance told me his rabbi was preaching in the synagogue that Hitler was “the Jewish Messiah” (a pious elder who sought to interpret events in terms of Levitical prophecy). All through these years the masses in both countries (and for that matter in Russia too) had their particular “premier-dictator” depicted to them in such terms, or in those of “Big Brother”, “Papa”, “Uncle”, “Beloved Leader” or the fireside-loving “Friend”. The apparent antagonists, Mr. Roosevelt and Herr Hitler, both in different ways promoted “the destructive principle” in its three recognizable forms: revolutionary-Communism, revolutionary-Zionism and the ensuing “world government to enforce peace”.

Mr. Roosevelt’s reign began with a significant deception. He used a wheeled chair but the public masses were never allowed to see him, in flesh or picture, until he had been helped to an upright position. His infirmity was known; nevertheless, some directing intelligence decreed that the false picture of a robust man must to his last day be presented to the multitude (and even afterwards, for the sculptor who later made his London monument had to depict him in this sturdy pose).

Mr. Roosevelt created precedent by having his cabinet sworn in the hand of a distinguished Jew, Mr. Justice Cardozo, who was a committed Zionist, having yielded in 1918 to Mr. Brandeis and Rabbi Stephen Wise, with the despondent-sounding words, “Do what you please with my name”; he then received his Supreme Court judgeships, Rabbi Wise requesting them for him, first from Governor Al Smith of New York State and then from President Herbert Hoover. Thus the shadow of “dual allegiance” fell on Mr. Roosevelt’s administration at its start (as on Mr. Wilson’s, from the figure of Mr. Brandeis).

(more…)

THE ZUNDEL TRIAL & FREE SPEECH
By Douglas Christie, B.A., L.L.B.
February 25, 1985

                  DOUGLAS CHRISTIE, B.A., L.L.B.
__________________________________________________________

[EDITOR’S NOTE: In the Introduction to this small booklet published by C-FAR back in 1985, then President of the Canadian Association for Free Expression, Daryl Reside, wrote:

“In this booket, C-FAR’s Canadian Issues Series is publishing excerpts from defence lawyer Doug Christie’s spirited summation to the jury at the Ernst Zundel trial. This summation was delivered February 25, 1985.

Zundel had been charged under Section 177 of the Criminal Code for having knowingly published false news that was likely to be injurious to the public good. In his ringing defence, Christie seeks to establish: 1) that credible reasons existed for much of what Zundel published; that is, he had justification and arguments for his point of view; 2) that he sincerely believed what he wrote and, therefore, did not knowingly publish falsehoods; and 3) that  a diversity of opinions, however controversial they may be, is vital to a democracy and in no way harms the public good. Threading its way throughout the entire summation is Christie’s passionate view that, right or wrong, a man must be permitted to search for the truth and express his point of view.

 It is this fierce commitment to principle and to liberty that makes this summation an important historical document…. It should also be noted that Zundel nowhere advocated illegal or violent acvtions in the two pamphlets in which he was accused of violating Section 177.”

It is now going on 25 years, a quarter of a century, since Doug Christie gave this summation to the jury in February of 1985. In the interim period the forces of censorship and repression have been successful in punishing Ernst Zundel to the max and he now sits in a dungeon in Zionist-occupied Germany and has been jailed for over six years already for having committed the gravest crime of the 20th Century: Speaking the truth.

Obviously the battle to end censorship is far from over. In my own case with these same Zionist Jew forces working through B’nai Brith Canada’s League for “Human Rights”, we see their relentless and calculated designs continuing to unfold before the public’s now awakening eyes. The war for freedom of speech continues.]

                 DOUG CHRISTIE’S SUMMATION TO THE JURY IN 1985

Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, it’s my role as counsel, to address you now and speak to you about the position of the defence. My first observation is that probably never before in the history of your country, have twelve people had to grapple with a more all-encompassing and serious issue than you will have to deal with. When you have finished your deliberations, in all probability your country will be made different, for as long as you and I will live, by the decision that you will make here about the most serious issues that confront any citizen in a free society.

You have spent seven weeks examining the evidence in one of the most wide-scoped cases in the history of Canadian jurisprudence. I said at the beginning, and I repeat to you now, that this is a case that should never have been before a court of law in a free society because it is an issue upon which courts will have no of difficulty in addressing and dealing with. If you have a clear understanding of the role of freedom in a free society, this may never have to happen again, because a clear indication that we permit and tolerate debate and points of view we may not agree with from a jury of twelve ordinary citizens will be the strongest indication to every politician in this country that we are not subject to the pressures of groups dictating ideas and determining how other people will think, act, and speak.

I suggest to you now that what you have heard in these seven weeks is a lot more information on the subject of the book, Did Six Million Really Die?, than you or I might ever have thought at first was likely to occur. I suggest that we have all learned something in this process. Tolerance, is indeed, one of the things that you have learned by hearing another side to a point that we always thought was so clear and so simple. But to everything we know in life, there are two sides, and many more quite often, and nobody, no matter how well informed or how expert, has all the truth, or ever will.

It should be for the law to determine the extent of debate in a free society. It shouldn’t be forced upon judges and courts to decide what is the truth about some historical belief. It’s nobody’s fault in this room that we are here. It is the duty of every one of us to do our duty as we are, lawyers, judges, jurors, but really it was a wrong political decision to bring before you and me the duty to examine history 40 years old to determine where the truth lies. It is a question that never should have been here. But having been placed in this position, we must deal with it, and we must deal with it to preserve important values in our society.

The first and most important value is the freedom to debate, the freedom to think, the freedom to speak and the freedom to disagree. This prosecution, has already had a very serious effect on those freedoms. If it were to result in a conviction, I suggest to you that a process of witch-hunting would begin in our society where everyone who had a grievance against anyone else would say “Uh-huh, you are false, and I’ll take you or pressure somebody else to take you to court and force you to defend yourself.” Even though our society says, as it always has, in this and every other charge, the burden’s on the Crown, the burden to prove every ingredient is on the Crown, the burden to prove that the thing is false is on the Crown, where does the accused stand? He’s here. He’s been here like you, at his own expense for seven weeks and whatever may become of this case, he’s already paid a very high price for the belief that he had the right to speak what he believed to be the truth.

(more…)

http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/tyranny2.htm#The%20Hidden%20Tyranny

The Harold Wallace Rosenthal Interview: The Hidden Tyranny (1976) Part 2

UNPLUG, TURN OFF, TUNE OUT – USE THE INTERNET & START THINKING!
__________________________________________________________________________

The Hidden Tyranny
Part Two

“Most Jews do not like to admit it, but our god is Lucifer.”

The above is an exact quote of Harold Wallace Rosenthal, former top Administrative Aide to the then Senator Jacob Jayits, who was since defeated in the 1980 election.

I, Walter White, Jr., for the past 17 years Director and Editor of the monthly conservative publication WESTERN FRONT, was told about Mr. Rosenthal’s boastings around Washington, D.C., and I was encouraged to meet with him and to interview him (for a fee).

Mr. Rosenthal had stated publicly that the Jews will completely dominate throughout the entire world — and that they control every facet of political life in America and every aspect of the communication media. (Mr. R’s emphasis).

Eventually Mr. Rosenthal and l were brought together, at which time I interviewed him privately and taped said interview with Mr. Rosenthal’s knowledge and consent. During the lengthy meeting Mr. Rosenthal became impatient, rude and vulgar (all of which is recorded on the tape) and he sought the balance of his fee before I had concluded my questioning.

Since the entire interview was so lengthy, in 1977 we released and published only the first portion under the same title as above “THE HIDDEN TYRANNY.” Copies of this manuscript (Part I) have been sought by people from all around the globe. We now release the balance of the taped interview as Part Two. Although I do not wish to digress, an Eastern analyst has told me that “The Hidden Tyranny” manuscript (Part I) has had a pass-on readership of 3.5%. Thus, if true, the manuscript (Part I) has been read by more than 7 MILLION people. When this final portion (Part Two) begins circulating, its impact may be even greater. It depends upon you, the reader.

Before any agreement was reached between us, I had established with Mr. Rosenthal that he would answer an unlimited number of questions with complete honesty and to the best of his ability. It was because of this understanding that I took issue with Mr. Rosenthal during the final stages of the interview and accused him of not being honest with me as it related to his response to my question: “Do you have knowledge of WHEN and WHY the story began about the Jews being God’s chosen people?” That is when he said in part: “Most Jews do not like to admit it, but our god is Lucifer — so I wasn’t lying — and we are his chosen people. Lucifer is very much alive.”

As this goes to press, we still seek a governmental body to investigate Harold Rosenthal’s allegations. My dictionary conveys such allegations as “TREASON.”

We now pick up after a dispute during which the tape recorder has been turned off.

(more…)

http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/tyranny1.htm#The%20Hidden%20Tyranny
The Harold Wallace Rosenthal Interview: The Hidden Tyranny (1976) Part 1

UNPLUG, TURN OFF, TUNE OUT – USE THE INTERNET & START THINKING!

___________________________________________________________________________

INTRODUCTION

This article contains the text of a most revealing and shocking interview of a Jew by the name of Harold Rosenthal, which was conducted in 1976, by a concerned patriot, a Walter White, Jr.. Mr. Rosenthal, an influential Jew learned in the Jewish ways and involved in the workings of government in Washington, D.C., explained the Jewish involvement and cause of the major problems we face today.

Rosenthal, in exposing certain aspects of the ‘inner invisible world of Jewry’, revealed the modes and tactics Jews have used in destroying Christian civilization and covertly attaining control over our lives and governments. The result has been a ‘hidden tyranny’ upon us like the tyranny waged against the Saints by the red beast system of Revelation referred to as ‘Mystery Babylon’.

But how could such a small number of Jews enslave so many people and gain such an overwhelming control over their governments, especially without their being aware of it? The answer to this may be found in Christ’s parable of the unjust steward, which represents Jewry. They are able to prevail in the world despite their ungodly ways because of their cunning and shrewd ways. As Christ said “For the children of this world are in their generation wiser than the children of light.” (Luke 16:8)

In other words, the Jew, with his worldly mind set, is wiser than God’s Christian people. When you read the words of Mr. Rosenthal the reality of this statement will come to light. This problem was so prevalent and important for us to overcome that Christ had instructed us to “be wise as serpents“. (Matthew 10:16)

America and the world is now covered in political, economic, moral and social problems which need to be acted upon by Christian people. As Edmund Burke stated: “The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.” But before we can properly act we need a proper (not just a superficial) understanding of the problem. This article will help provide the reader with that understanding.

(more…)

The 6 Day War started by Israel on June 5th, 1967 was then embellished with Zionist propaganda in Zionist-controlled News Media such as LOOK magazine in this Front Page issue of Nov. 14, 1967
_____________________________________________________________________

http://www.powerofprophecy.com
Do The Jews Own Hollywood And The Media?

By Texe Marrs

May 9, 2009

Texe Marrs
______________

Do the Zionist Jews own Hollywood and the media? Are they using the media to mold and shape American opinion by constantly injecting Zionist propaganda and bias into news programs, movies, television shows, even children’s cartoons and entertainment?

The answer is so blatantly “Yes!” that you wouldn’t think these questions are even worth pursuing. But recently, the untoward comments of a patriot talk show host made me stop and rethink it. Are there people out there-even in the Patriot Movement-who really are that much in the dark, who deny Jewish influence in the media?

Recently, when a caller to a talk show on the Genesis Radio Network suggested that the Jews control the media, the host went wild. He raged on and on, playing the race card. He branded the surprised caller and others like him who are weary of Zionist influence “Nazis” and “anti-Semites.” Angrily, he denied Jewish involvement in any conspiracies and ridiculed those who had the audacity to suggest that Jews run Hollywood or the media. Then, in a real fit of spewed venom, the talk show host demanded that the caller and all others who believe like him should go out and hang themselves to promote population reduction.

As if that wasn’t hateful enough, the pro-Zionist host then stated that all the “Nazis and Anti-Semites” who opposed Zionism and the Jews should plug in an electric toaster, hold it to their naked bodies, jump into a bathtub filled with water, and have a party.” In other words, kill themselves.

Quite a rampage by the supposedly “patriot” talk show host. And all because the poor caller had dared to propose undue Jewish influence over the media.

Hearing the actual taped broadcast of this unbelievable tirade by a pro-Zionist advocate confirmed my resolve to inform good folks once again of the truly dictatorial grip that Zionist Jews have on the media. The best way to do this is not to rage and spew venom, but simply to present the facts, to document the truth of Jewish control of the media.

What Do Knowledgeable Jews Say?

How about going to top Jews in the media themselves and see what they say? Take Joel Stein, for example, columnist for the Los Angeles Times newspaper and regular contributor to Time magazine. In his column in the LA Times (Dec. 19, 2008), Stein says that Americans who think the Jews do not control Hollywood and the media are just plain “dumb.”

“Jews totally run Hollywood.” Stein proudly admits. He then goes on to provide a long, long list of Hollywood/media chieftains-all Jews!-to prove his point. On his list: Fox News President Peter Chernin; Paramount Pictures Chairman Brad Grey; Walt Disney CEO Robert Igor; Sony Pictures Chairman Michael Lynton; Warner Brothers Chairman Barry Meyer; CBS CEO Leslie Moonves; MGM Chairman Harry Sloan; and NBC/Universal Studios CEO Jeff Zucker.

That’s just the top brass at the studios. Then there are the actors and entertainers-predominantly Jews, from Barbara Streisand and Gwyneth Paltrow to Tom Hanks and Ben Afleck. JewJewand Jew again. As Stein wryly remarks, even the head of the Actors’ Union, the Screen Actors Guild, Alan Rosenberg, is a Jew.

“The Jews are so dominant,” writes Stein, “I had to scour the trades to come up with six Gentiles in high positions at entertainment companies.” “But lo and behold,” Stein says, “even one of that six, AMC President Charles Collier, turned out to be a Jew!”

“As a proud Jew,” says Joel Stein, “I want America to know of our accomplishment. Yes, we control Hollywood.”

ADL’s Foxman Admits Jewish Control

Stein says he then called Abe Foxman, Chairman of the Jewish ADL, to ask him, why don’t more Jews just come out and boast at this great accomplishment? Foxman responded by admitting that yes, it’s true that most of the top execs “happen to be Jewish.” In fact, Foxman told Stein, “all eight major film studios are run by men who happen to be Jewish.”

Ben Stein (no relation to Joel), the well-known Jewish actor, economic commentator and writer, when asked “Do Jews run Hollywood?” stared blankly at the questioner, then retorted, “You bet they do-and what of it?” Shahar Ilan, writing in www.haaretz.com, the internet division of Israel’s top daily newspaper, commented, “The Jews do control the American media. This is very clear, and claiming otherwise is an insult to common knowledge.”

Neal Gabler, also a Jew and a noted media researcher, wrote an entire book outlining Jewish control of Hollywood. It was entitled, An Empire of Their Own: How the Jews Invented Hollywood. But to really see how the Jews, in their own publications and press, view the reality of Jewish control of the media, all one has to do is take a look at a recent issue of the Jewish Daily Forward, which featured an article entitled, “Billionaire Boychiks Battle for Media Empire.”

Billionaire Jews Battle for Media

This fascinating, look-see article discussed how the Jews had for decades owned the media and now were competing; that is, vying, to buy one of America’s most powerful media companies, Tribune Company, which owns 23 television stations, a baseball team, and many major newspapers, including the Chicago Tribune and the Los Angeles Times.

“However, it turns out,” gloated the Jewish mag, “we’ll have a Jew in charge of the (LA) Times, which was once one of old Los Angeles’ most famous WASP (White Anglo Saxon Protestant) institutions. What a great day for old LA Jews”

The publication noted that among the Jewish billionaires (”boychiks”) vying for the Tribune media empire is “Liberal, Jewish, media mogul David Geffen.”

And who, pray tell, is the current owner of the Tribune Company? Why, that would be Jewish billionaire Sam Zell. Zell is a major donor to Israeli, Zionist and Jewish causes. His own rabbi proudly reports that Zell is “a committed Zionist, a generous supporter of Israel, and a member in good standing of the synagogue.”

Asked who his own favorite newspaper columnists were, Zell quickly answered, “Charles Krauthammer, Thomas Friedman, and David Brooks.” Surprise! The trio are all ardent Zionist whack-jobs who clamor over each other demanding the U.S. attack Iran, provide billions more in foreign aid to favored nation Israel, and so forth.

Local Newspapers Owned by Foreign Agents

So powerful is the Jewish control over the media that Nathanael Kapner, a rare Jew who converted to Christianity and now is adept at reporting these things, asserts that no longer can we trust our local daily newspaper. “Zionist Jews have taken over the ‘local newspaper’ in America,” Kapner writes. Indeed he explains that there basically is no local newspaper anymore, because, “Most local newspapers are owned by companies controlled by Zionists whose offices are hundreds of miles away.”

Please visit: http://www.realzionistnews.com

Kapner provides manifold evidence of Zionists’ dominating control of the media at all levels. The Newhouse Empire of the Jewish brothers Samuel, Donald, and Theodore Newhouse, Kapner says, “illustrates the insatiable appetite for opinion control:”

“Today, the Newhouse Empire owns 40 local newspapers across the U.S.A. These include the Newark Star Ledger, the Cleveland Plain Dealer, the Portland Oregonian, and the St. Louis Globe-Democrat.”

Then, there are the vast array of magazines run by the Jewish Newhouse family-including the New Yorker, Vogue, Golf Digest, Glamour, Gentleman’s Quarterly (GQ), and the massively circulated newspaper insert, Parade magazine.

Jewish Media Spew Out Pro-Zionist Propaganda

The fact that Zionists control virtually every media outlet in America is no doubt why the American citizenry hears only one version of events in the Middle East-the pro-Jew, pro-Israeli side. This led Dr. Kevin MacDonald, professor at California State University, to write:

“In the contemporary world, organized American Jewish lobbying groups and deeply committed Jews in the media are behind the pro-Israel U.S. foreign policy that is leading to war against virtually the entire Arab world.”

This Zionist bias and propaganda spin by the Jewish-owned American media is not new. As far back as 1978, the noted Jewish political writer Alfred Lillienthal, in his revealing book, The Zionist Connection, stated:

“The most effective component of Jewish connection is probably that of media control. It is well known that American opinion molders have long been largely influenced by a handful of powerful newspapers, including the New York Times, the Washington Post, and the St. Louis-Post Dispatch (All Jewish Families).”

To further illustrate the breadth of Jewish media control, we note that Jewish magnate Arthur Sulzberger’s media empire today includes not only the New York Times (which, in Stalin’s day, systematically covered up the genocidal crimes of Jewish commissars in Communist U.S.S.R), but also the Boston Globe, the Lexington Dispatch (NC), the Gainesville Sun (FL), the Ocala Star Banner (FL), the Tuscaloosa News (AL), the Spartansburg Herald Journal (SC), and the Santa Barbara News Press (CA). Each of the newspapers Lillienthal mentioned back in 1978, in turn, owned and still owns dozens of others. So tainted is the news because of this that almost every newspaper in America endorsed President George Bush’s radically pro-Israel policies in the Middle East, including Israel’s savage butchery of Lebanon and Palestine.

There can be no doubt. It is easy for us to document the massive dominance over the media by evil Jewish shills who are continually hostile to pure American interests while, everyday, unabashedly spewing out reams of misleading Zionist propaganda. Time magazine, Newsweek, NBC, ABC, CBS, CNN, FOX-and many, many more are all owned or run by Jews and operated solely to further the aims of the traitorous, anti-American, ever-growing Zionist World Empire.

All America is in the Grip of the Hidden, Red Iron Fist of Zionism

Of course, the media, even as important as it is to our culture, is only a bit piece of the whole that is now, regrettably, under the big thumbs of the Jewish Zionist elite. Our educational establishment, Wall Street, the banks, the Federal Reserve, our Congress, the White House (just consider Rahm Emanuel, the Zionist Israeli freak who is Obama’s White House Chief of Staff), and our judiciary-each and every one is infiltrated by Zionist radicals who put Israel and their own “Chosen People” first, to the detriment of everything sacred to honest, God-fearing, hard-working Americans.

So, the next time you hear some ignorant rube on talk radio or elsewhere shoving the race card in your face and ranting and raving about “Nazis” and “anti-Semites” who “claim” the Jews control the media, why don’t you just reach out and turn that radio dial to another place. And please, don’t forget to also let the radio network and station manager know of your displeasure.

The fact is that the dishonest Zionist shills out there promoting Zionist lies, drivel, and nonsense truly deserve our contempt.

The Truth is Precious

As for Texe Marrs and Power of Prophecy, we have long pledged ourselves to telling you the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. And part of that truth, simply put, is this: That yes, absolutely, Zionist Jews do own and control Hollywood and the media. So beware of their lies and deceit. The truth is precious. Let us work together to protect and nurture it.

————–
Texe Marrs, Author and Researcher may be contacted at http://www.powerofprophecy.com

     Watercolor painting of Karls Church in Winter by Adolf Hitler 1912

___________________________________________________________________________

[Editor’s Note:

Henry Makow’s recent articles are showing strong signs of an underlying, not-too-subtle attempt at continuing the longstanding Zionist propaganda campaign of extreme hatred toward the German people plus endless vituperation toward the National Socialist party of former Nazi Germany.

It seems that no matter how hard some Jews try to overcome their own brainwashing regarding the holy hoax commonly known as the “Jewish Holocaust” (and it is harder for Jews than for any other group I believe) there are some who, like Mr. Makow, just cannot bring themselves to the point where accepting such a truth is possible. Instead, as in Henry’s case, he continues to expound upon and support the lie of that event and in doing so paints himself into an unenviable corner; that of yet another agents provocateur coloring his otherwise token samplings of injustice with the usual, ongoing disinformation campaign against the German nation and the German people; a process that first began in earnest in 1933 has never ceased to this day.

Blending strong portions of Illuminati and Freemasonry information with a dab of Zionism and a touch of Rothschild and a sprinkle or two of Satanism to come up with the standard recipe for global hegemony on the part of these assorted groups Henry weaves a fine and captivating tale of intrigue but, alas, one which ultimately exposes him as a double-agent when he throws into his potpourri of conspiracy theories the two ingredients that inevitably separate the wheat of truth from the chaff-leaven of Talmudic Zionist falsehood – those being the standard, ongoing denigration of the German people and Adolf Hitler as the Empire of Evil and the tacit, sanctimonious support for the holocaust lie – the two pillars upon which the faulty Zionist edifice rests.

As Hans Krampe states in his title, “Henry Makow never forgets” – he never forgets to always add more layers of deception to the two lies of the 20th Century that are absolutely necessary for the Zionist Jew Conspiracy to carry on its program for complete world control.

It’s unfortunate that Henry must kowtow in this manner to the Zionists by unwittingly (or wittingly) supporting their heinous program of hatred toward the one nation that had the balls to stand up to the Bolshevik/Zionist/Communist threat to the world. When we consider that he is supposedly under attack by these very same Zionist lobbyists (the Canadian Jewish Congress) who are using the infamous Section 13(1) of the Canadian Human Rights Act to charge him with hate crimes against Jews it becomes almost too incongruous to imagine that he would allow himself to fall into the trap of emulating his oppressors and their insidious propaganda.

He was so close to breaking free of their mind-control programs; so close to ridding himself of an unnecessary lie bequeathed to all Canadians by the Zionist-controlled media; so close to discovering the truth behind the Zionist lie. So close…but not close enough Henry. And so, with a sad heart, and as the old saying goes, “Sorry Henry, close… but no cigar.]

Henry Makow never forgets
A Response to Henry Makow’s recent article, “Bormann Ran Hitler for the Illuminati”

http://www.henrymakow.com/002026.html

By Hans Krampe

May 7, 2009

In the photo with Hitler, isn’t that Henry Makow in profile?

Henry Makow – a Bormann agent?
_____________________________________

I think Henry Makow is an agent of Bormann, whose purpose it is to keep the memory of a devoted Bolshevik Nazi head and shoulders above that of Adi Hitler. Bormann must still be hanging in there, in South America somewhere, pulling Henry’s strings. How old would he be now? 109 or so?!

Hitler must’ve been not only an evil illuminati toy, but a successful guinea pig of a soviet style MKULTRA treatment (a “fact” still classified and buried in the Kremlin, but Henry has an inkling anyway), programmed and remote controlled. . . by Bormann. . . according to Makow’s instructive ruminations. Didn’t the Nazis invent brainwashing? Or may be they were all guinea pigs too and the illuminati made them invent it for themselves!

         John F. Kennedy

_____________________________

“Hitler… one of the most significant figures who ever lived”

~ President J.F. Kennedy

“Hitler will emerge from the hatred that surrounds him now as one of the most significant figures who ever lived…
He had a mystery about him in the way that he lived and in the manner of his death that will live and grow after him.
He had in him the stuff of which legends are made.”

~ John F. Kennedy,
President of the
United States of America

Jewess Gertrude Stein, Nobel Peace Laureate, recommended that Adolf Hitler be given the Nobel Peace prize. A self-hating Jew?
___________________________________________________________________________

Apparently, the illuminati seem to have paid for everything the Nazis did; like: from national bankruptcy and over 6 million unemployed to full employment and a booming economy in three years, free medicare, free education right thru university, over 1.2 million affordable and extremely attractive family homes (coddling their favorite mass murderers), the 8 hour workday, Sundays off, 21 days paid holidays a year for workers, paid maternity leave for pregnant women and young mothers, maternity spas, over 4000 new kindergartens, holiday resorts for children, luxury liners on which workers could go on two week cruises for less than 170 marks, regular symphony orchestra performances in factories, vivisection outlawed, environmental standards Henry can only dream of, even today, the Autobahn, the Volkswagen, a low cost and high standard of living etc., when the rest of the world could only think of war as a measure of ending the depression. . . and all this with no natural resources to speak of, no gold reserves and nothing but hostility surrounding the country. . . except for the illuminati. Oh, and the Zionists; mustn’t forget those.

Hitler’s Volkswagen
_________________________

It had to be a short state of grace, granted to the condemned before their execution by the illuminati, who kept the cost of living low and the standard of living high in the Third Reich out of sheer cynical malice. How else could the Nazis have managed, led by clueless and treacherous Adolf?? It’s all nice and evil, no doubt! Slave labour, plain as day, has been their key to success. Henry will be sure to unearth the necessary data and interconnect things for us, you know, cross the Ts and dot the Is.

We mustn’t forget the holocaust! It happened, as Henry would no doubt agree. We just can’t prove it, because the stupid Russians won’t release the files that would. They sure hung the right guys for Katyn, though, unless anyone wants to deny that too.

Auschwitz! A sheer horror show of swimming pools, soccer fields, a 40 000 volume library, a theatre, 12 different orchestras, a state of the art hospital and dental clinic run by Jewish doctors, a maternity ward, a kindergarten, university education classes, a state of the art community kitchen, brick dormitories, a post-office, an inmate run police, a jail, a brothel; and work, lots of it, WITH PAY. And let’s not forget INVISIBLE GAS CHAMBERS. And thousands of babies burned alive in massive ditches filled to the brim with ground water. Elie Wiesel saw it all himself and - doing Louis Kilzer one better - he got a Nobel Peace Prize for writing the book “Night” about it. That should qualify it as an astute first hand account. I mean, it won the top pooba of a prize, right? They even made it into a movie. So it’s got to be true, even more so than Kilzer’s. Only problem is, nobody who knows anything about Auschwitz believes a word in it. But at least he makes the Nazis look agreeably bad, which should compensate amply for zero truth. Perhaps Henry can help us here to debunk Wiesel’s detractors.

Auschwitz – still stands complete with brick housing facilities and swimming pool.
___________________________________________________________________________

Today, thanks to guys like Henry, we “know”, the fancy stuff in Auschwitz (typical German deviousness) was just camouflage, you understand, to make the horror look normal for the International Red Cross and the catholic priests who were there from beginning to end but aren’t allowed to sing.

You don’t believe it? Ask Henry, he will find a way to prove it. . . sort of. And if he can’t, guys like Louis Kilzer will jump into the breech. You can trust old Louis, he’s got it all figured out. The main thing is that the Nazis were bad, bad, BAD. . . and getting worse by the minute.

Henry, we’ve got the message! You can relax now; and just tell the Canadian Jewish Congress to lay off. It’s obvious that you’re going to behave from now on.

Menachem Begin
_____________________

“Our race is the Master Race. We Jews are divine gods on this planet. We are as different from the inferior races as they are from insects. In fact, compared to our race, other races are beasts and animals, cattle at best. Other races are considered as human excrement. Our destiny is to rule over the inferior races. Our earthly kingdom will be ruled by our leader with a rod of iron. The masses will lick our feet and serve us as our slaves.”  Prime Minister of Israel, Menachim Begin (left), in a speech to the Knesset, quoted in Amnon Kapeliouk, ‘Begin and the “Beasts”, New Statesman, 25 June 1982.

Noam Chomsky
___________________

“If the Nuremberg laws were applied, then every post-war American president would have been hanged” -Professor Noam Chomsky

Adolf Hitler & Young Friends
______________________________________________________

Hitler’s proposals for a European pacification plan for Europe were delivered to the Geneva League of Nations. His proposals included:

*    prohibition of the dropping of gas, poisonous or incendiary bombs
*    prohibition of dropping any bombs outside fighting fronts
*    prohibition of artillery weapons over 12 miles from battle zones

“Germany will be perfectly ready to disband her entire military establishment and destroy the small amount of arms remaining to her, if the neighboring countries will do the same thing with equal thoroughness. Germany is entirely ready to renounce aggressive weapons of every sort if the armed nations, on their part, will destroy their aggressive weapons within a specified period, and if their use is forbidden by an international convention. Germany is at all times prepared to renounce offensive weapons if the rest of the world does the same. Germany is prepared to agree to any solemn pact of non-aggression because she does not think of attacking anybody but only of acquiring security” ~ Adolf Hitler
——–

Hans Krampe is a former feature writer for The Radical, a monthly tabloid pubished by The Radical Press from 1998 to 2002. He can be reached at Hans Krampe hjk@quesnelbc.com

Original dustcover from 1st ed of Douglas Reed’s 1978 classic

______________________________________________________________________________

[Editor’s Note: There is currently a furious battle over freedom of speech going on in Canada brought on by the infamous Section 13(1) of the Canadian Human Rights Act. Due to its subsequent misuse by pro-Zionist lobbyists such as B’nai Brith Canada and the Canadian Jewish Congress to stifle and stop all publication within Canada of any information relating to either Israeli foreign and domestic policies or information informing Canadians as to the real agenda of Political Zionism and its direct threat to Canadian institutions and laws, the Canadian Human Rights Commission and the CHR Tribunal have been hijacked into fulfilling the role of police censor and judge and jury.

This is the dilemma in which I and my website www.RadicalPress.com are caught up in. We have been subjected to continuous harassment since November of 2007 when Harry Abrams and the League for “Human Rights” of B’nai Brith Canada filed a “complaint” with the Canadian Human Rights Commission contending that I and my website are “spreading hatred toward Jews and/or citizens of Israel”.  This situation has reached the “Show Trial” stage wherein the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal is attempting to fulfill its mandate to satisfy these foreign Zionist lobbyists by holding a “hearing” in which they will supposedly listen to arguments from both sides and then come to a decision as to whether or not I am guilty of said charges.

In the original complaint filed with the CHRC the complainants Abrams and B’nai Brith Canada cited the fact that I had published the “Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion” on my website and thus, obviously must be guilty of “anti-Semitism” and “hatred” toward Jews and “racism” and whatever other enduring Zionist epithet might be used to slander anyone who dares to challenge the authority of Zionist Jews. 

But now the tables appear to have been turned and both the Complainants and the Commission are trying to deny that this document was submitted as evidence and are doing their damnedest to dismiss my demand that this particular document, of all those complained of, be entered into the official file of the Commission. Their reasons and logic for attempting to do so are as curious as they are ludicrous.

For that reason I am republishing some very important information on these so-called “vicious” “anti-Semitic” Protocols which was written by the famed British journalist Douglas Reed in 1956 in his world classic, The Controversy of Zion.  No writer anywhere has ever mastered the abilities of Reed to decipher the hidden agenda of the Zionists and their insidious plan to control the world and turn its peoples into slaves of a one world government known as the New World Order. If the Canadian Human Rights Commission gets its way this vital information, extremely relevant to the world today, will be dismissed outright as the Zionists have attempted to do since the first English edition of the Protocols appeared in 1920. But while the internet remains a free exchange of ideas and information it WILL appear here at RadicalPress.com. I would ask anyone and everyone reading this article to save it and post it and pass the url to it along to their readers. Douglas Reed’s interpretation of the Protocols is as vital to the overall understanding of today’s political turmoil as fresh oxygen is to a living breathing human.]

Chapter 27 of The Controversy of Zion, THE “PROTOCOLS”
(circa 1956) published in 1978

by Douglas Reed

    DOUGLAS REED

__________________________

“The conspiracy for world dominion through a world slave state exists and cannot at this stage be abruptly checked or broken off; of the momentum which it has acquired it now must go on to fulfilment or failure. Either will be destructive for a time, and hard for those of the time in which the dénouement comes.”

~ Douglas Reed, from Chapter 27, THE “PROTOCOLS”

While Zionism thus took shape in the Eastern ghettoes during the last century and at the start of this one emerged as a new force in international affairs (when the British Government offered it Uganda), the world-revolution, in those same Talmudic areas, prepared its third “eruption”. The two forces moved forward together in synchronization (for Zionism, as has been shown, used the threat of Communism in Europe to gain the ear of European rulers for its territorial demand outside Europe). It was as if twin turbines began to revolve, generating what was in effect one force, from which the new century was to receive galvanic shocks.

According to Disraeli and Bakunin the world-revolution had come under Jewish leadership around the middle of the century, and its aims then changed. Bakunin’s followers, who sought to abolish the State as such because they foresaw that the revolutionary State might become more despotic than any earlier despotism, were ousted and forgotten. The world-revolution therewith took the shape of Karl Marx’s Communist Manifesto, which aimed at the super-State founded in slave-labour and in “the confiscation of human liberty” (as de Tocqueville wrote in 1848).

This change in leadership and aims determined the course of the 20th Century. However, the methods by which the existing order was to be destroyed did not change; they continued to be those revealed by Weishaupt’s papers published in 1787. Many publications of the 19th Century showed that the original Illuminist plan continued through the generations to be the textbook of the revolutionaries of all camps, as to method.

(more…)

Introduction to the Protocols

Since it was first published more than a century ago, The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion has shocked and fascinated the world. It has appeared in countless editions in every major language, flourishing in spite of ceaseless efforts to dismiss, ridicule and suppress it.

What is this remarkable and enduring work?

Apparently a secret guide or handbook for achieving world domination, it explains how a small group of initiated Jews, the “Elders,” can gain power over the world’s non-Jewish peoples, the “goyim.”

Organized into 24 chapters or “protocols,” possibly based on notes from lectures, the work is in the form of instructions to a new member of the inner circle of conspirators. It lays out a plan by which the Elders can undermine and destroy stable societies, and impose their own monopolistic rule over humanity. To hasten the collapse of the societies not yet under their control, the conspirators will promote corruption, immorality and social strife in all countries, especially Christian ones, while working to obliterate the national, ethnic and religious character of all non-Jewish peoples.

The Jewish conspirators are instructed to work patiently toward their goal using deceit and guile, hiding their true intentions, and exploiting the naïve nature of the “goyim.” The Elders seek to replace the traditional social order with a “one world” government run by Jews that will cynically manipulate the public through control of finance and the media.

Freemasons figure in The Protocols as a secretive and well-organized group of non-Jews that is allied with the Jewish Elders, a sort of conspiracy within a conspiracy. While Freemasons and other liberals are considered helpful in destroying the traditional social order, eventually they will be shoved aside as the Jewish theocracy takes full control. The work describes a forthcoming “kingdom,” although even in this final stage of Jewish global rule, the Elders will avoid direct or open control, preferring instead to run things through devious manipulation of money, the media and cultural life. Even the “King of the Jews” will be a figurehead.

The Protocols was first published in an abridged edition, in Russian, in 1903 in the Saint Petersburg newspaper Znamya. In 1905 the full text was published in Russia by the orthodox priest Sergei Nilus, as an appendix to his work, “The Great in the Small.”

In an introduction to a 1911 edition, Nilus explained how he obtained the manuscript:

“In 1901 a now-deceased acquaintance, Court Marshal Alexei Sukhotin of Tchernigov, gave into my possession a hand-written manuscript that detailed completely and clearly the secret Jewish-Freemason conspiracy that will surely lead to the end of our vile world. The person who gave me this manuscript assured me that it was a faithful translation of the original document. It had been stolen by a lady from one of the highest  and most influential leaders of the Freemasons following a secret meeting somewhere in France, that hot-bed of Masonic conspiracy.”

In an edition issued in 1917 Nilus wrote:

“…Now for the first time I have learned from authoritative Jewish sources that the Protocols is nothing less than the strategic plan of world conquest whereby the world will be brought under Israel’s yoke, the enemy of God. The plan, worked out by the leaders of the Jewish people during the many centuries of the Diaspora, was finally disclosed to the Elders by the Prince in Exile, Theodor Herzl, at the time of the first Zionist congress in Basel (August 1897).”

Theodor Herzl is sometimes credited as the author of The Protocols, or as the person who gave the lectures upon which the work seems to be based. He was the founder of the modern Zionist movement, and the author of The Jewish State, a highly influential booklet that was the movement’s seminal work. Just half a century after the First Zionist Congress, the Jewish state of Israel was established in Palestine, a remarkable achievement that attests to Jewish determination, power and organizational skill.

Russia’s emperor, Tsar Nicholas II, read The Protocols with interest. In the margins of his personal copy, his handwritten notes express his first reaction: “What precise execution of their program!”; “Our [Russian] 1905 [uprising] was clearly orchestrated by the Zion Elders!”; “The Jews’ guiding and destroying had is visible everywhere.”

The November 1917 Bolshevik seizure of power in Russia seems to give shocking validation to the conspiracy laid out in The Protocols, and greatly boosted interest in the work. Bolshevism was indeed a secretive, conspiratorial movement whose ultimate goal was world domination. Along with other Communists, the Bolsheviks were fanatic followers of the German Jewish philosopher Karl Marx. They openly proclaimed that their goal was the imposition of a worldwide Communist “dictatorship of the proletariat.”

Jews were prominent among the revolutionary activists who took control of Russia in 1917 and established the Soviet regime. The two most important Bolshevik leaders were Lenin (Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov), who was one-quarter Jewish by ancestry, and Leon Trotsky (Lev Bronstein), who was entirely of Jewish descent. Trotsky headed the Red Army and, for a time, was chief of Soviet foreign affairs. Other leading Jewish Bolsheviks included Yakov Sverdlov (Solomon), who was both Bolshevik party’s executive secretary and chairman of the Soviet state’s Centrao Executive Committee; Grigori Zinoviev (Radomyslsky), who headed the Communist International (Comintern), the central agency for spreading revolution in foreign countries; press commissar Karl Radek (Sobelsohn); foreign affairs commissar Maxim Litvinov (Wallach); Lev Kamenev (Rosenfeld); and Moisei Uritsky.

Well-informed observers, both inside and outside of Russia, took note of the crucial Jewish role in Bolshevism. David R. Francis, United States ambassador in Russia, warned in a January 1918 dispatch to Washington: “The Bolshevik leaders here, most of whom are Jews and 90 percent of whom are returned exiles, care little for Russia or any other country but are internationalists and they are trying to start a worldwide social revolution.”

In England, Winston Churchill warned in an article published in the London Illustrated Sunday Herald (February 8, 1920) that Bolshevism is a “worldwide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development of envious malevolence, and impossible equality.”

                       Winston Churchill

The eminent British political leader and historian went on to write:

“There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international and for the most part atheistical Jews. It is certainly a very great one; it probably outweighs all others. With the notable exception of Lenin, the majority of the leading figures are Jews. Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power come from the Jewish leaders. Thus Tchitcherin, a pure Russian, is eclipsed by his nominal subordinate, Litvinoff, and the influence of Russians like Bukharin or Lunacharski cannot be compared with the power of Trotsky, or of Zinovieff, the Dictator of the Red Citadel (Petrograd), or of Krassin or Radek – all Jews. In the Soviet institutions the predominance of Jews is even more astonishing. And the prominent, if not indeed the principal, part in the system of terrorism applied by the Extraordinary Commissions for Combating Counter-Revolution [the Cheka] has been taken by Jews, and in some notable cases by Jewesses.”

In 1920 editions of The Protocols began to appear in all the major European languages. The work was widely distributed throughout the 1920s and 1930s, with especially brisk sales in Britain, Germany and the United States.

The English-language text that appears in this edition was translated by Victor E. Marsden, a British journalist who was the correspondent in Russia for The Morning Post, an important London daily newspaper. After the Bolsheviks seized power in Russia, he was arrested and held prisoner for a time. Upon his release and return to England, he translated Nilus’ version into English. Marsden’s translation, first published in 1920 or 1921, has since remained the “standard” English-language text.

In the United States, an unsigned article headed “The International Jew: The World’s Problem,” appeared in the May 1920 issue of a Michigan weekly newspaper owned and controlled by the great American automobile pioneer and manufacturer Henry Ford. This was the first of dozens of articles in The Dearborn Independent that examined “the Jewish question” in detail.

Several of the articles sympathetically discussed The Protocols. In the issue of July 10, 1920, for example, an item titled “The Jewish Political Program,” explained:

“Whosoever was the mind that conceived them [The Protocols] possessed a knowledge of human nature, of history and statecraft which is dazzling in its brilliant completeness, and terrible in the objects to which it turns its powers. Neither a madman nor an international criminal, but more likely a super-mind mastered by devotion to a people and a faith could be the author, if indeed one mind alone conceived them. It is too terribly real for fiction, too well-sustained for speculation, too deep in its knowledge of the secret springs of life for forgery…

“The internal evidence makes it clear that the Protocols were not written by a Russian, nor originally in the Russian language, nor under the influence of Russian conditions. But they found their way to Russia and were first published there…

“The progress of the Protocols in the United States can only be explained on the ground that they supply light and give meaning to certain previously observed facts, and that this light and meaning is so startling as to give a certain standing and importance to these otherwise unaccredited documents. Sheer lies do not live long, their power soon dies. These Protocols are more alive than ever.

Two weeks later The Dearborn Independent again dealt with The Protocols. In an article entitled “An Introduction to the ‘Jewish Protocols’,” readers were told:

“The Protocols as we have them are apparently the notes of lectures which were made by someone who heard them. Some of them are lengthy; some of them are brief. The assertion which has always been made in connection with the Protocols since they have become known is that they are notes of lectures delivered to Jewish students presumably somewhere in France or Switzerland. The attempt to make them appear to be of Russian origin is absolutely forestalled by the point of view, the reference to the times and certain grammatical indications.

“…Whether the Protocols are judged as proving anything concerning the Jews or not, they constitute an education in the way the masses are turned about like sheep by influences which they do not understand. It is almost certain that once the principles of the Protocols are known widely and understood by the people, the criticism which they now rightly make of the Gentile mind will no longer hold good.”

The many Dearborn Independent articles dealing with “the Jewish question” were reprinted in four book-length volumes, known collectively as The International Jew: The World’s Foremost Problem. During the next five years, hundreds of thousands of copies of The International Jew were distributed in the United States, and abridged editions, often with Henry Ford’s name on the cover, appeared in a range of languages and countries. These publications greatly boosted the fame and notoriety of The Protocols.

“The only statement I care to make about The Protocols,” said Ford in a February 1921 interview, “is that they fit in with what is going on. They are 16 years old, and they have fitted the world situation up to this time. They fit it now.”

The first German-language edition of The Protocols was published in 1920, and numerous printings and editions appeared in the following years. Alfred Rosenberg, an associate of Adolf Hitler, prepared a German edition that appeared in 1923 under the title of Die Protokolle der Weisen von Zion und die judische Weltpolitik. (After the end of World War II, Rosenberg was condemned to death by a tribunal in Nuremberg organized by the victorious Allied [Zionist-controlled] powers.)

Hitler himself remarked on The Protocols in his book Mein Kampf, which he wrote in 1924-25:

“…To what extent the whole existence of this [Jewish] people is based on a continuous lie is shown incomparably by the Protocols of the Wise Men of Zion, so infinitely hated by the Jews. They are based on a forgery, the Frankfurter Zeitung [an important Jewish-owned liberal daily] moans repeatedly to the world, which is the best evidence that they are authentic. What many Jews may do unconsciously is revealed here consciously. It does not really matter from which Jewish brain these disclosures originate. What is significant is that they reveal with rather terrifying precision the character and the activities of the Jewish nation and expose their inner contexts as well as their ultimate goals. The best critique of it, though, is reality. Anyone who examines the historical development of the last one hundred years from the perspective of this book will immediately understand the cries of the Jewish press. For when this book becomes the common property of a nation, the Jewish danger may be regarded as broken.”

                                   Adolf Hitler

Similar comments were made by other public figures. In 1934 a widely-read Irish priest, the Rev. Denis Fahey, C.S.Sp., B.A., D.D., wrote:

“These Protocols are said to be the rough notes of a series of conferences delivered to a select body of Jewish leaders assembled in secret conclave about the end of the nineteenth century. They purport to give an outline of Jewish plans for the preparation of the Messias to come. On the one hand, the authenticity of this document cannot be proved; on the other, the efforts made by some writers, principally Jewish, to show it to be a forgery do not carry conviction to many serious minds…

“What must be kept in clearly in mind and emphasized, throughout any discussion concerning the Protocols, is the very grave fact that the program outlined in them is being fulfilled… Anyone who reads the Protocols carefully will be obliged to confess that a more skillful plan could hardly be devised for the destruction of belief in our Lord and the preparation of the advent of the new Messias. In addition, if the reader is acquainted with the world, he will see that the plan is being carried out, and that, as a result, Jewish power is increasing.”

In Canada, Member of Parliament Norman Jaques declared in the House of Commons on July 9, 1943: “Those who feel libeled by the Protocols have the most obvious remedy in the world; all they have to do is rise and denounce the policy of them, instead of denying the authorship… But when you come to read them how can any reasonable man deny the truth of what is contained in them?”

Over the years numerous efforts have been made to “expose” The Protocols as a malevolent fraud. The first was a series of articles published in August 1921 in The Times of London, which told readers that the work was a plagiarized forgery. A few weeks later these articles were reprinted in The New York Times. In the years since, countless books and articles meant to discredit The Protocols have appeared.

Many governments have banned the work outright. The first was the Soviet regime that seized power in Russia in 1917. The country’s new Bolshevik rulers severely punished anyone caught distributing or even possessing a copy. Following the victory of the Soviet Union and the United States in World War II, The Protocols was banned in most of Europe, including in all Soviet-controlled countries. More than 60 years after the end of the war, publication and distribution of the work is still prohibited in Germany, Austria, and a number of other European countries that forbid writings that might encourage anti-Jewish sentiment.

In countries where The Protocols has not been suppressed, such as in South America an Asia, the work has remained popular. In Japan, books that echo the theme of The Protocols have been bestsellers. Since the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, and the end of Soviet hegemony over central Europe, new editions have appeared in Russia and other formerly Soviet-controlled countries. The work has remained especially popular in Arab and Muslim countries, where numerous editions have been issued.

In January 2006 voters in occupied Palestine elected a new government headed by Hamas, the militantly anti-Zionist “Islamic Resistance Movement.” Article 32 of the Hamas Covenant states: “…The Zionist plan is limitless. After Palestine, the Zionists aspire to expand from the Nile to the Euphrates. When they will have digested the region they overtook, they will aspire to further expansion, and so on. Their plan is embodied in the ‘Protocols of the Elders of Zion,’ and their present conduct is the best proof of what we are saying.”

In addition to the many published editions, the internet makes The Protocols instantly available everywhere in a range of languages.

Much of the reason for the work’s enduring popularity and impact is that the conspiracy it outlines seems to be more dangerous than ever. Even many who might not accept The Protocols as an authentic document nonetheless regard it as a fascinating validation of Jewish methods and goals.

The awesome power and influence of organized Jewry is undeniable. Especially in the United States, Jews wield tremendous power, above all through their hold on television and motion pictures, and their prominent role in political life. The Jewish-run “Israel lobby” insures that U.S. Foreign policy steadfastly supports the Zionist state and its policies of brutal occupation  and aggressive war. It is this reality that moved Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir Mohammed to boldly declare in October 2003 that “today the Jews rule this world by proxy.”
——–

Read The Protocols on the RadicalPress site. Go to the following page:
http://www.radicalpress.com/?page_id=601

COVER OF THE OCTOBER 1, 1966 EDITION OF MACLEANS MAGAZINE
______________________________________________________________________

Ezra Levant: Zionist Word-butcher & German Hater

by Arthur Topham

April 27, 2009

Not long after publishing my recent article, 911 & Sec. 13(1): Coincidence or Collusion linking the harassment of 9/11 Truth seekers to Section 13(1) of Canada’s “Human Rights” Act I received an email from a friend and supporter in New Brunswick who said, “Hi Arthur. A great essay. I think you ought to write the definitive book, “Zionism for Dummies” and have Amazon sell it.”

Well, I thought to myself, that would be a good idea considering the lack of real knowledge and understanding surrounding this subject and the fact that the mainstream media in Canada is owned and controlled by the Zionists so there’s not much chance they’re going to start educating the Canadian public on the nature of this rather controversial topic. Yes, a great idea indeed if…only I wasn’t in the very midst of a rather crucial legal battle with the very forces which my friend hopes that I might tell the reading public about so they could get a better picture of what’s really going on, not only in Canada but around the world.

And then, no sooner that I got to thinking about all the “dummies” who need to be told the truth about Zionism, along comes Ezra Levant’s article of April 27, 2009, “Why did the Jewish Congress build up the Nazi Party?”. After reading what he had to say about Bernie Farber and Rabbi Reuven Bulka of the CJC and how they conspired to create (or should I say, inflate?) the “Canadian Nazi Party” in the 1960s, it got me to thinking that maybe there was a way in which we could enlighten Canadians about the actual workings of this mysterious Babylonian cult which first emerged upon the world’s stage a little over a century ago as the World Zionist Organization and has since come to be the most influencial, dominant and dangerous force in the world today; one whose destiny is soon to be revealed to the mesmerized millions who’ve been held in mental and emotional bondage to its siren songs since the beginning of the 20th Century and especially since it took control of the movie industry, the newspaper and print and publishing industry and finally the television industry beginning in the late 1940s.

GARRITY SPY WITH HIS STOLEN FILES FROM THE CANADIAN NAZI PARTY
_________________________________________________________________________

But this isn’t the place to begin Chapter One of “Zionism for Dummies”. Rather its the place to once again try and explain to Canadians the deceptive element that’s hidden within the political ideology known as Zionism and to show them how this deception is carried on by all proponents of Zionism, be they the zealous, yet elusive and subtle advocates of the type that Ezra Levant is or the more overt brand of Zionist like Mark Steyn who makes no bones about his love for this form of political philosophy.

Also included in this definition of course must be the many crypto-Zionist types, in particular those who fall within the camp known as “Christian” Zionists and who hide their overt love for the state of Israel and their hatred for Arabs and non-Zionist Christians and all other heathen behind veils of not so sophisticated sophistry and bellicose rhetoric.

All of these elements which make up the body of Zionist thinkers and advocates will inevitably expose their true selves via time-tested, tell-tale signs which tend to always mark the ideological territory claimed by the Talmudic high priests of Zion. One of the foremost of these signs will inevitably be the anti-German, anti-National Socialist rhetoric; one of the more prominent hallmarks of hatred that delineates both their pathology and their racist ideology.

MOB OF CANADIAN JEWISH MAFIA VIGILANTES OUT FOR NAZI BLOOD
_______________________________________________________________________

If one is ever to get a firm grip on how Zionism operates the very first lesson to learn, over and above anything else, is that whatever the Zionist says it must be construed as both false and deceptive and the very opposite meaning has to be attached to any statements made by them. If one fails to do this automatically and tries to rationalize and think through their ideas then that person is bound to get lost and confused for the intent of any public utterance meant for non-Zionists is to obfuscate and lead astray or else support the Zionist “logic”.

There are many more guidelines to understanding how the Zionist deceives his gullible listeners but this one principle (thinking the opposite meaning to what they infer) must suffice for this article.

Now on the surface one would think from reading Levant’s article that he’s the knight in shining armour dashing into the armed camp of the influencial and censorial Canadian Jewish Congress on his great white steed and with one fell swoop lopping the heads off its leaders Farber and Bulka and claiming victory for free speech advocates while at the same time denouncing the Big Brother commissars from the Canadian Human Rights Commission and the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal. And that is precisely what the Zionists want Canadians to think and that is why both Levant and the Ottawa Citizen conspired to run his story and why Ezra is so “pleased” that the Citizen gave him “so much room to reply.”

There’s no doubt that Richard Warman, the former CHRC lawyer and investigator, has been leading the “hate crimes” brigade for some time now and that Levant and others such as Kathy Shaidle and Connie Fournier of FreeDominion.ca are all being sued by him and that they’re all fighting to stop Warman’s endless suits which the CJC obviously supports. But that, in itself, is not the whole story just as Levant’s attack on the CJC for their involvement in the former Canadian Nazi Party is not the whole story.

Beyond all of this is the relentless, ever-present and persistent push to denigrade Germany and reinforce the myth (Lie) that the National Socialist Party of Germany was responsible for both World Wars and foremost, for having murdered 6 million Jews in concentration camps in eastern Europe by the use of gas chambers and ovens. This, plus the screeching whine of endless “anti-Semitism” are the two pillars upon which political Zionism rests and the Zionists will do whatever is necessary in order to maintain this illusion in the minds of the public and that includes, if needs be, sacrificing some of their own in order to do so, including the CJC.

BLAIR FRASER REPORTS ON LEGAL REMEDIES FOR NEO-NAZIS
________________________________________________________________

It wouldn’t be the first time either for records exist which show how the Zionists did their utmost during the 1930s and 40s to stop hundreds of thousands of Jews from leaving Germany and eastern European states prior to the Nazis ever engaging in military acts. All this was done in order to ensure that World Jewry would be granted their “homeland” in Palestine after the war ended and as is now known the Zionists were more than willing to sacrifice their fellow Jews in order to accomplish this deed.

In the case of the Canadian Jewish Congress the decision had already been made that this organization would be slated for sacrifice.  As I said in my article 911 & Sec. 13(1): Coincidence or Collusion, the CJC has lost its position as a major player in Jewish Canadian politics and has been swallowed up a bigger fish, the “New” Canadian Council for Israel and Jewish Advocacy (CIJA), formed by the ultra Zionist Asper media cartel who own and control CanWest Global Communications Corporation.

In true Zionist style therefore we will likely see the CJC become Gefilte fish as CanWest’s hired word-butcher (Levant) working in CanWest’s butcher shop (the Ottawa Citizen), fillets it leaving only the head, skin and bones showing for temporary public viewing while Section 13(1) is being attacked. Then, thanks to Levant who suddenly “discovers” the old Macleans magazine article from October, 1966 on the “neo-Nazis” and the CJC, now begins the process of grinding down and boiling the remains in the CanWest’s corporate cauldron until just the right texture is achieved and before long they’ve got CJC “balls” so to speak, ready to be served up on a platter in sacrificial fashion to the voracious Asper/CIJA appetite.

And what of the word-butcher Levant? Why he’s supposed to come out smelling like a rose, the saviour of the Goyim and the hero of the free speech movement while the real heroes, Marc Lemire and Barbara Kalaszka are side-stepped and ignored in favour of a good kosher Zionist. Whether this scenario actually manifests or if he actually begins to smell like those fish balls do after a few days, remains to be seen.

The main point again, if I may, is that throughout this whole exercise in Zionist propaganda and mind-control, we are seeing, as is par for the course, Zionist Jews playing the lead roles in both sides of this seemingly controversial battle over Section 13(1). Levant is a Zionist. Asper is a Zionist. Bernie Farber is a Zionist. An unholy trinity of vipers out to bewitch the public with their sophistry and media magic, aided and abetted by their crypto-Zionist supporters (the “dummies”) who have no real idea what the Big Picture is all about.

At the end of the Levant rant we see the same old hatred spewed forth against the Germans just to remind those readers (again) who may have forgot their daily Zionist catechism of the Great Persecution and the Holocaust and “gas chambers” and Cotler’s “New anti-Semitism” creed now being slipped surreptiously into the Zionist culture we tend to think of as being truly “Canadian”.

Allow me to conclude with a challenge to Levant and the Asper media giant. Ezra, feigning slight disappointment over the Citizen’s headline: “Neo-Nazis are best simply ignored” boldly states that rather than ignoring those dastardly, evil Nazis or even charging them with “hate crimes”, we ought to rebut and debate them and prove the fallacy of their arguments so that Canadians will understand once and for all just how wrong the Germans were and how right the Zionists are.

Well, Ezra Levant, you now have a challenge of the same caliber coming from someone who is not a German or a member of any neo-Nazi organization but who will nonetheless debate the issues of National Socialism and political Zionism with you and prove to Canadians once and for all that whatever threat the Nazis may have posed to humanity pales in comparison to the destruction and infamy and death brought upon the world throughout the 20th Century by those who profess to be Zionists and who work to create a world where Zionist principles and values are held in high esteem over those of Christian and/or pagan values and democratic principles.

Let’s see if CanWest Global Communications Corporation will offer up a national debate between myself and you on the issue of political Zionism. I would think the National Post would be the most fitting of the Asper organs to run this debate seeing as how it is a Canada-wide publication. Each of us will be given Op-Ed space of 1500 words maximum per article and these sessions will run consecutively until a national poll determines who is the winner. You defend Zionism and its Talmudic values and I’ll defend Democracy and Christian/pagan values. In lieu of doing physical battle I propose this as the most civilized and reasonable manner in which to determine who of us is truly fighting for Canada and its sovereignty as a free and democratic nation.

The gauntlet has been thrown down Ezra. Will you and CanWest have the courage to pick it up?

—————-

Arthur Topham is the Publisher & Editor of http://www.RadicalPress.com . He lives in central BC, Canada and can be reached at radical@radicalpress.com

Dr. Fredrick Toben with Lady Michelle Renouf in London after
escaping the clutches of the Talmudic Zio-bloodhounds in the fall of 2008
________________________________________________________________

Toben Down. Who’s Next?

By Arthur Topham

April 16, 2009

This is one of those articles that I find SO difficult to write and remain civil while doing so. Being in the midst of a legal battle myself with these Talmudic Tyrants of Tyranny out to control every aspect of human life and consciousness in their mad attempt to take over the world I find the usual protocol of being courteous to these maniacal, mind-controllers practically, as well as esthetically, impossible to adhere to. So if you’re not up to a bit of cussin’ and politically incorrect pronouncements then best you switch back to FOX or CNN.

When I see a fellow Truth Warrior like Dr. Toben, trapped by their perfidious web of ‘legal’ lies and deceit and knowing only too damn well their mendacious motives for silencing men and women who have the courage of their own knowledge and convictions to stand up to these savage, pseudo-savants of sophistry and deception, a primal sense of outrage, so deep and so strong, wells up from within me and all I want to do is search the keyboard for the button that reads SCREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEAM!!!! and press on it with all my might until the intensity of the anger and the utter disgust finally abates.

True to form the Zionist media dogs lap up all the usual Zionese/Legaleese language of their masters and vomit it forth via their newspapers and out from their Ziovision screens around the world as if it is going to reinforce the obvious, blatant lies of which they are so desperately attempting to sustain. Dr. Toben “Holocaust denier” “guilty” of “criminal contempt” and “defying orders”  to stop publishing “racist material” on his website ad nauseum.

The Zionist owned and controlled “Jewdiciary” of Australia have “held” that Fredrick doesn’t accept the Zionist version of what the Talmudic Jews have mandated as “freedom of speech” and “history” so they have found him “guilty” of “28 counts of contempt”. Thus Jeremy Jones (a good kosher Jewish handle if ever I saw one), former president of the Executive Council of Australian Jewry, the Orwellian weasel who first launched the complaint against Mr. Toben back in 1996, is now smirking to his Talmudic brethren and telling them how Australia is now firmly in the grasp of the infamous Noahide “Laws” of the Talmudic Lubavichers once and for all.

(more…)

http://wwwStopSection13.com

http://www.canadianlawyermag.com/War-of-the-words.html

War of Words

By Lisa Gregoire

March 2009
“Without knowing the force of words,” Confucius said, “it is impossible to know men.” He was right of course. It seems he always is. Words start fights and stir yearning hearts to acts of bravery and bloodshed. We use words to debase others and exalt ourselves. We pray with words. We shout, organize, slander, teach, threaten, understand, share ideas in Internet chat rooms, and boast in blogs. Words of our lovers, mothers, and enemies roll around in our heads when we can’t sleep making us mad with jealousy, regret, revenge.

Douglas Christie (right)
and Richard Warman*
_________________

Words simply spoken can turn thousands toward malevolence with gas chambers. Or machetes. Which is why the preservation of a peaceful, pluralistic society like Canada hinges on outlawing hate. Or does it? Perhaps words are simply words — offensive, even forceful at times, but essential to a public discourse from which reasonable citizens in a democracy inform their personal opinions.

This polemic has alternately simmered and boiled for more than three decades and no two lawyers in Canada exemplify this debate more precisely than hate propaganda sleuth Richard Warman and free speech libertarian Douglas Christie: crusaders, courtroom foes, and fellow vegetarians. And though they’d cringe at being compared further, they do share one thing more: strangers want them dead.

Someone drove a truck through lawyer Doug Christie’s street-level office once. He wasn’t there at the time. Christie’s been threatened and his property has been vandalized. People have thrown rocks at him, clenched fists, and a veritable thesaurus of insults: “perverted monster” was one of his favourites. He sued for defamation in that case and lost. “They called it fair comment. I mean, where do you go from there?” asks Christie, munching bean salad in the Ottawa courthouse cafeteria during a break in a defamation suit he’s pursing against Warren Kinsella and the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation on behalf of his client, Ian Verner Macdonald, a retired foreign service diplomat.

“I believe a person should be judged as an individual. But I realize some people can’t do that and they’ve judged me according to what they think is the company I keep,” says the 62-year-old Christie, whose client roster of Holocaust deniers, neo-Nazis, and white supremacists has come to define the Victoria lawyer as much as his signature cowboy hat and boots.

(more…)

_____________________________________

B’nai Brith Canada Desperate to Stop Christie Intervention in Abrams v. RadicalPress.com Complaint

By Arthur Topham

April 5, 2009

From: ir5570@dsklaw.com
Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 12:01 AM
To: Marvin Kurz
Subject: Attached Image

Marvin Kurz
Dale, Streiman & Kurz
480 Main St N
Brampton, ON, L6V 1P8
905-455-7300
Fax 905-455-5848
mkurz@dsklaw.com
http://www.dsklaw.com/

The information contained in this transmission, including any attachments, is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. No waiver of privilege, confidence or otherwise is intended by virtue of communication via the internet. Any review, re-transmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you receive this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.

___________________________________________________________________________________

Dear Reader,

Let it never be said that the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada doesn’t have a sense of humour! The enclosed letter which I received from Marvin Kurz, head counsel for B’nai Brith Canada on April 1st, 2009 (April Fool’s Day) has got to be one of the better jokes that people tried pulling on me that day. As such, after deep and thoughtful consideration of all the Fools who participated in this designated day of Tom Foolery, I must award Marvin the Trophy for #1 Fool(er) of the Day.

It’s most amusing indeed to see someone combine outlandish hyperbole and rhetorically redundant citations with such an air of haughtiness, hair-splitting, humbug and hubris in order to convince others, (in this case the CHR Tribunal) that whatever Mr. Christie could possible offer in the way of corroborating, supportive opinion and expertise on the side of freedom of speech in this “Human Rights” complaint is both irrelevant and a waste of everyone’s time; and, therefore, according to Mr. Kurz’s and his clients’ not-so humble legal beagle logic, Canada’s foremost authority on issues of Freedom of Speech should NOT be granted intervenor status in the current “hate crimes” complaint involving B’nai Brith Canada and RadicalPress.com.

Going to great lengths by dredging up case after case to emphasize his provocative position, counsel Kurz then adopts the selective language of a fellow Jew, Dr. Sigmund Freud, notorious cocaine addict of the late 19th Century, interpreter of dreams and “Father” of modern day psychology to embellish his suspiciously specious arguments. Incorporating Freud’s coke-induced fantasies about how the human psyche operates Marvin strives to provide convincing documentary “proof” that Mr. Christie’s Canadian Free Speech League is nothing more than the “alter ego” of Mr. Christie himself and therefore should be of no legitimate concern to any Canadian seriously concerned about internet censorship and the loss of their fundamental right to freedom of speech.

Now my Dictionary of Psychology defines “alter ego” as: a very intimate friend so close as to be “another self”. In other words, according to Mr. Kurz’s depiction, the Canadian Free Speech League (CFSL) is just ol’ ego-bound Doug Christie expanding his other sense of “self” into further projections of fiction for the obvious gratification and glorification of him alone (and possibly his good wife Keltie Zubko too). Whether or not there may be other members or supporters of the CFSL across the nation who might also relate to or believe in the aims and aspirations of this organization is, according to Kurz’s hypothesis, highly unlikely and doubtful although Marvin doesn’t elaborate on that aspect of the organization.

Considering this novel approach of Mr. Kurz’s I thought it might be useful to take his “psycho-logical” assertions and extrapolate upon them a bit further. Based on his definition I guess one could say that RadicalPress.com too is just the “alter ego” of Arthur Topham and nothing more. Just ol’ Topham the Terrible saturating his website with hate-filled, vitriolic, anti-Semitic articles that abuse and demean and hold in utter contempt all the Jews of the world including even the “citizens of Israel”. I’m assuming of course that he and his clients mean the “Jewish” citizens of Israel and not the Arab or Christian or other non-Jewish citizens. On such a basis therefore it would be preposterous and a delusion for anyone to imagine RadicalPress.com as a legitimate news service which, in fact, it has been for the past 11 years.

By Mr. Kurz’s “psycho-logic” and that of those he represents, it’s just Topham’s other “self”; his hate-infested “alter ego” spewing forth endless megs of digital vileness and contempt that no decent, normal, upstanding sane Canadian would ever wish to be associated with. Those who would want to view such racist rot are, of course, that BBC inflated percentage of perennial and persistent “anti-Semites” and “hate mongers” and “neo-Nazis” and “white Supremacists” who, as we all know, forever lurk just around the corner from the next synagogue, waiting with Blackberries in their hot, sweaty hands, to read Topham’s “hate-filled”, “racist” literature and then broadcast it even further afield to the detriment of Jews everywhere.

So that more or less covers Christie and Topham and their suspect agendas but what of Marvin Kurz and the BBC and their subconscious urges? Do Sigmund’s Freudian fantasies of “alter egos” apply to himself and his snow-white co-conspirators as well? Let’s take a look and see if we can’t determine what Marvin and company’s “alter ego” is composed of, the sort of entity or body it might possess or manifest through and whether in the long run it is an “intimate friend” of freedom-loving Canadians.

According to his website http://www.dsklaw.com/ Mr. Kurz is the National Legal Counsel for the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada. Not only that but he’s been seriously involved in free speech issues for many years just like Mr. Christie and his bio show an impressively long list of accomplishments in the way of curtailing for Canadians their true and God-given right to speak their minds freely and to publish their thoughts in like manner on the still (relatively) free internet. Not surprisingly Mr. Kurz has been a member of B’nai Brith Canada for some time holding prominent positions on the BoD and devoting what must be endless hours and energy to attending conferences and composing treatises on how to limit Canadian’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

(more…)

Liza Minelli and Joel Grey performing Money Song (Sitting Pretty) in the movie Cabaret
___________________________________________________________________

[Editor’s Note: I have intentionally refrained from posting the personal contact information on Harry Abrams which was contained in the document below. I don’t think it serves any positive purpose and would likely just add additional fuel to the B’nai Brith’s already red-hot furnace of furious, unfounded charges that I am somehow “repeatedly and publicly” vilifying Abrams “for his ethnicity and religion” because I have made the details of this vexatious complaint public from the beginning.

In case Harry and his cohorts haven’t twigged on the reason for doing this I’ll explain it again in clear, simple language. These “show trials”, (for that is what they are) bear all the “Hallmarks” of those of the former Bolshevik Zionist-run Soviet Union where only what the State and the controlled media wanted the people to read and see. All the dirty dealings and backroom shenanigans and so on never appeared. That is not my idea of a free press – one that presents ALL the facts in order to achieve a consensus of truth and justice.

We have to see this hideous “hearing” hag for what she really is and from every angle possible no matter how revolting and disgusting she may be without her make-up and her fancy rhetorical garments. Were she the real beauty that Justice truly is this whole charade wouldn’t be taking place to begin with so that is why I have tried to make public every pimple and blemish, every slip up and every deceptive ploy being used to create the false image that somehow something genuine and meaningful is taking place. I will continue as long as humanly possible to document this Boshevik/Zionist plot until every piece of repressive legislation contained in the CHR Act has been surgically removed and caste back into the pit of Hell from where it first slithered forth.

As far as I am concerned this whole “hate crimes” affair epitomizes the pure, Talmudic-Pharisaic influence that’s crept into Canadian jurisprudence via subterfuge, deception and the viperous, seditious behaviour of special interest groups that purport to be aligned with Canadian values and laws yet, in fact, are acting in the interests of foreign nations and foreign political doctrines that any honest Canadian would find abhorent if they knew the truth. This current Zionist/totalitarian legislation contained in Section 13(1) of the Canadian Human Rights Act symbolizes everything that is wrong with our judicial system and with the general moral and ethical deterioration of our nation, and I, as one Canadian, it will remain silent in the face of what I perceive as a direct threat to my ideals and my country. That is why I’ve chosen to NOT allow it to go unnoticed nor unexposed! Hopefully Harry and the BBC will understand this explanation.

What Harry feigns as ‘vilification’ could possibly have something to do with his own issues of self-esteem but in truth, from what he explicitly states and expects as the preferred final outcome (or reward?) of this complaint for himself and his lobby group B’nai Brith Canada, I find such an explanation highly improbable. I suspect rather that it has more to do with the sound of that old jingle from the Zionist propaganda film Cabaret, “money, money, money, makes the world go ’round“, than anything resembling “Justice”.

(more…)

THE 1st EDITION OF THE RADICAL CAME OUT JUNE, 1998. IT’S HEADLINES NOW STAND AS A FOREWARNING OF THE STRUGGLES THAT LAY AHEAD WITH THE SUBVERSIVE FORCES OF TYRANNY EMBEDDED IN CANADA’S GOVERNMENT, JUDICIARY, MEDIA AND INSTITUTIONS

______________________________________________________________________________

Dear Free Speech lovers,

As you can see from the headlines of the First Edition of The Radical of June, 1998 the prime objective of The Radical Press was to ensure that Canadians would not end up living under a tyrannical government that used censorship to silence important debates of any nature be they political, religious, philosophical, or otherwise.

Whether that original headline was a prophetic warning of things to come or not waits to be seen still. Judging from the events of the last few years it appears that the forces of repression and censorship in this nation are bound and determined to do their best to turn Canada into another Orwellian police state where freedom of speech becomes a thing of the past.

As we’ve seen just recently with the Harper government’s shameful kowtowing to the Canadian Jewish Defense League and their  banishing of British MP George Galloway from entering Canada, the writing is definitely on the wall! Now is the time for concerned citizens everywhere to speak out and let our politicians know, in no uncertain terms, that such behavior on the part of our elected representatives is NOT ACCEPTABLE IN THIS FREE NATION!

The Zionist forces hiding within these lobbyist groups like B’nai Brith Canada, the Canadian Jewish Congress and this newcomer on the block, the Jewish Defense League, are all working in the interests of foreign governments rather than the people of Canada and our right to free expression.

Since I first put out a plea on the net March 2, 2009 for letters of support in my battle with Zionist B’nai Brith Canada the response has been phenomenal and positive. From notable and busy activists such as Jeff Rense, David Icke, and Canadian website owner Connie Fournier of www.freedominion.ca to people across Canada, the USA and the world, encouraging messages of support for freedom of speech on the Internet are growing stronger by the day.

As only a couple of days remain before I must send all these letters to the Tribunal as part of the upcoming hearing process I’m enclosing some examples received thus far by individuals who, regardless of their extremely busy schedules or place of residence, have taken the time to lend their support to this important complaint case by the CHRC and Tribunal.

Please read them or at least scan through them. Hopefully you will be moved to also express your thoughts on this issue. In more ways than one time is running out and please don’t misconstrue that statement as mere scare tactics on my part.
Anyone wishing to see the form letter that can help you with the basics of the case please go to the following url at RadicalPress.com. http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=937

Also I must put in a plug for financial help from those willing and able. Please see  http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=930    for details.

Please pass this message along if you can. Thanks.

PS. Due to time constrains I’m not going to make links of all the email addresses contained in the letters. If you wish to contact any of the writers merely copy and paste their address from the article.

Shine your Light for Love & Peace & Justice for All,

Arthur Topham
Pub/Ed
The Radical Press

——————————————————-

LETTERS OF SUPPORT FOR RADICALPRESS.COM

#93

Shastah Topham
shastatopham@yahoo.com

Nancy Lafontant
Registry Officer
Canadian Human Rights Tribunal
Nancy.Lafontant@chrt-tcdp.gc.ca

Date: March 25th 2009

Nancy Lafontant,

RE: File Number: T1360/9008

The complaint case by the Canadian Human Rights Commission involving Arthur Topham and his website RadicalPress.com and Harry Abrams and the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada is one which deeply concerns me.

Arthur Topham and I have been married for over thirty years. My Jewish heritage has never been an issue in our life together - in fact quite the opposite. He often mentioned he knew he would marry a Jewish woman.

I feel that it is of paramount importance for the tribunal to distinguish the difference between “anti-Semitism” and “anti-Zionism”. They are not one and the same concept.

Anti-Semitism bespeaks of racism and hatred towards Jews. My husband Arthur Topham has never demonstrated behaviors of racism or hatred toward myself, or any person, group, or religion.

Political Zionism, on the other hand, is a practice which is not remotely connected to religion or God. It is more of a philosophy or ideology based on astronomical greed, corruption, power and control.

The book, “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion” clearly indicates the ideology and concepts of what Zionism is based on. I suggest that each and every person within the CHR Commission and the CHR Tribunal read “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion” to educate themselves on the true nature of Political Zionism.

My husband Arthur Topham, in his quest to expose Political Zionism and educate the world, is uncovering a massive Zionist secret nest of lies and deceit, the origin of which goes back well beyond the Twentieth Century.

Any attempts to muzzle the truths that Arthur Topham is bringing forward to the public would be silencing his God given right to free speech. All people who sit on the CHRC and CHRT are cognizant of this truth, and must therefore decide which master they will serve – SATANIC ideology – or the GOD of TRUTH, INTEGRITY and LOVE.

Mrs. Shastah Topham
Cottonwood, B.C.

#86

Nancy Lafontant
Registry Officer
Canadian Human Rights Tribunal
Nancy.Lafontant@chrt-tcdp.gc.ca

March 20, 2009

Dear Nancy Lafontant,

RE: File Number: T1360/9008

The complaint case by the Canadian Human Rights Commission involving Arthur Topham and his website RadicalPress.com and Harry Abrams and the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada is not only of extreme importance to citizens of Canada but also to the people of the United States of America.

I am an American citizen and the owner of a major alternative News Network (www.rense.com) and the host-producer of my own nationally-syndicated Talk Radio Program (for 15 years) here in the U.S.

Like Canada’s notorious Sec. 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act, our US House Judiciary is also currently facing two pending federal ‘hate’ crime bills-HR 256 and 262.

These ‘hate crimes’ bills - introduced by special interest groups not unlike those in Canada now attempting to destroy Mr. Topham and his website - pose a direct threat to the First Amendment to our US Constitution; and like Sec. 13 of your CHR Act, ought to have no place in any of our respective nations’ law books.  All human beings have a God-given birthright to their own opinions and thoughts.  There is no such thing as ‘partial’ or ‘restricted’ free speech just as there is no way to be partially pregnant.  We either have full, unfettered Freedom of Speech, or we have none.

I am adamant in my feeling that the VAST majority of Canadians, just like Americans, do not want or need ANY anti-free speech laws…and all efforts in that regard should be taken to rid your nation of them.

It is my position that censorship of ideas and opinions of people anywhere has no place in the media nor on the Internet in a free world.

On behalf of Arthur Topham and RadicalPress.com, I would ask that you give serious attention to eliminating these draconian laws from your Canadian Human Rights Act and allow Freedom of Speech to resume its rightful place in all forms of debate.

Sincerely,

Jeff Rense
sightings@mindspring.com

#88

Nancy Lafontant
Registry Officer
Canadian Human Rights Tribunal
Nancy.Lafontant@chrt-tcdp.gc.ca

March 22, 2009

Dear Nancy Lafontant,

RE: File Number: T1360/9008

The complaint case brought against Arthur Topham and his website RadicalPress.com by the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada via the Canadian Human Rights Commission is not only of utmost importance to all Canadians who wish to express themselves on the Internet freely but to people everywhere who value this basic human right.

As a British citizen and the owner/operator of one of the world’s largest alternative websites ( www.davidicke.com ) I find it outrageous that such injustice is now being perpetrated upon Arthur Topham and his website.

Like Mr. Topham I also have also been attacked by the likes of former CHRC Investigator and serial litigator Richard Warman, who takes the term ‘thin skin’ to new levels of meaning. As a result, I have been accused of similar ludicrous “hate crimes” when I could not be racist if my life depended on it. So I understand the nature of this charge against Topham and his website.

Canada’s notorious and discredited Sec. 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act, was designed by special interest groups such as the Canadian Jewish Congress, B’nai Brith Canada and others and then inserted into the CHR Act to be used against other individual Canadians and groups who, according to Canada’s Bill of Rights and its Charter of Rights and Freedoms as well as the International Right under the Charter of Rights of the United Nations, nonetheless retain the legal, and most basic, human right to express their opinions and those of others on their websites or in their public writings.

This problem of Zionist lobby groups attempting to subvert the constitutional rights of free speech in so-called free nations around the world is becoming more and more obvious and vast numbers of people who once dismissed such claims as ‘racist’ are now seeing this blatant fact. The example of your federal government banning an elected British MP, George Galloway, from entering Canada is just the most recent and graphic example of what I’m talking about.

On behalf of Arthur Topham and RadicalPress.com, and all freedom-supporting Canadians who oppose such actions by lobbyists for foreign nations, I would suggest you give serious attention to eliminating these draconian laws from your Canadian Human Rights Act and allow the fundamental and crucial right to freedom of speech to resume its rightful place in all forms of debate.

After all, your own children and grandchildren will also have to live in the Orwellian world you are helping to create. Will they thank-you for it? Or be disgusted?

Sincerely,

David Icke
8 Vernon House,
20 Wood Street,
Ryde,
Isle of Wight
United Kingdom
PO33 2JR

BOOKRES@aol.com

#87

Nancy Lafontant
Registry Officer
Canadian Human Rights Tribunal
Nancy.Lafontant@chrt-tcdp.gc.ca

March 20, 2009

Dear Nancy Lafontant,

RE: File Number: T1360/9008

I am writing on behalf of Arthur Topham from the Radical Press.

Mr. Topham is the respondent in a Section 13 complaint by Mr. Harry Abrams.

Although Arthur Topham has political opinions that differ vastly from my own, I think it is important that he is allowed to express them, and I am deeply disgusted that the CHRC is still busily trying to censor Canadian citizens.

The CHRC has come under intense scrutiny over the past year, and this whole process has been discredited.  It really is time that they stopped trying to police the online speech of Canadians and started doing something useful, like protecting human rights instead of stomping on them.

When this case goes to a Tribunal, I guarantee that it will be covered extensively in the online media, and that the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal will not have another opportunity to conduct their business in the dark and, in the words of Richard Warman, “continue their tradition” of issuing lifetime Cease and Desist Orders to every respondent.

Mr. Topham will not be fighting this fight alone.  Those days are over.

Sincerely,

Connie Fournier
Free Dominion
Connie Fournier connie@freedominion.ca

#85

Nancy Lafontant
Registry Officer
Canadian Human Rights Tribunal
Nancy.Lafontant@chrt-tcdp.gc.ca

March 19, 2009

Ms Lafontant;

RE: File Number: T1360/9008

I’m writing to you today to express my concerns over a case currently before your tribunal; Harry Abrams and the B’nai Brith vs. Arthur Topham and his website radicalpress.com.

Right off the bat I’m going to tell you that I think Topham’s ideas, in regards to Jews, are repulsive.  I find them inaccurate and ill-informed.  That said, however, I also have a very strong belief that as a free individual in what is supposed to be a free country, Topham has the right to express those ideas unhindered by the state.  As a person who believes very strongly in the fundamental right of ALL Canadians to be able to express their opinions without fear, I wish to register my dissatisfaction with the fact that special lobby groups and thin skinned serial complainers are attempting to use the Canadian Human Rights Act and Sec. 13(1) to stop their fellow Canadians from expressing their opinions and beliefs.

Arthur Topham is before your Tribunal where he’s charged with the crime of committing “hate speech”.  More specifically, as indicated by Harry Abrams in his complaint, and while Abrams was gloating on the Western Standard blog ( http://www.no-libs.com/files/w_s_abrams.htm ), Topham is being persecuted for making available, a copy of the “Protocols Of The Elders Of Zion”, a document that is freely available on the internet.  I myself have made that document available on my website, along with 2 other documents that Harry Abrams will surely find offensive; the Quran http://no-libs.com/media/docs/Quran.pdf and Mein Kampf http://no-libs.com/media/docs/meinkampf.pdf .

If Harry Abrams and your tribunal are to continue with your persecution of Arthur Topham, you’ll have to stand me alongside him as I’ve committed the exact same “crime”.

My name is Richard Evans and you know where to find me.

Richard Evans
richard@no-libs.com

#79

Nancy Lafontant
Registry Officer
Canadian Human Rights Tribunal
Nancy.Lafontant@chrt-tcdp.gc.ca

Date: March 16, 2009

Dear Nancy Lafontant,

RE: File Number: T1360/9008

I have known Arthur Topham as editor of Radical Press for approximately 15 years and he has always expressed his opinions openly without prejudice and he has no expectations of persuasion or transference on behalf of the reader. He often expresses radical assumptions and provides interesting conjecture through his editorials. His aptly named former newspaper and website “Radical Press” should indicate to any free thinking intelligent individual the challenging level of his discourse.

As a person who believes very strongly in the fundamental right of ALL Canadians to be able to express their opinions and views without fear of legal repercussions I wish to register my dissatisfaction with the fact that special lobby groups in Canada are attempting to use the Canadian Human Rights Act and Sec. 13(1) to stop their fellow Canadians from expressing their opinions and beliefs on matters of importance to Canada.

I strongly feel that a person’s right to speak their mind in an open, civil and truthful manner on political, social and religious issues of the day is crucial to an understanding of how our society and the world at large works and that a person’s viewpoint should not be censored merely because it disagrees with either the status quo or the position of another interest group with differing political views.

Judging from how this Sec. 13(1) of the Canadian Human Rights Act has been used to unfairly penalize free expression in Canada I believe that this legislation should be removed from the CHR Act and that issue of “hate crimes” should be dealt with as in the Criminal Code of Canada where a person thus charged has the right to a fair trial in a court of law with either a Judge or a Judge and Jury.

Thank you,

Denis Walsh,
City Councillor, Kamloops.
520A Seymour St.,
Kamloops, BC
denis@telus.net

#84

March 18, 2009

Nancy Lafontant
Registry Officer
Canadian Human Rights Tribunal
Nancy.Lafontant@chrt-tcdp.gc.ca

Dear Ms Lafontant,

RE: File Number: T1360/9008 (B’nai B’rith Canada vs. RadicalPress.com)

I am writing in connection to the complaint made against Mr. Arthur Topham and The Radical that is now before the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal.  In this case, the complaint appears to have been brought by the B’nai B’rith in regard to Mr. Topham’s writings on Israel and Zionism.  A recent case against columnist Mark Steyn was made by another special interest group alleging that Mr. Steyn had instigated hatred against Muslims.

As a person of Jewish heritage, I find much of what Mr. Topham writes about these topics difficult to read, occasionally overstated, and sometimes (in my view) simply wrong.  By the same token, I find Mr. Steyn’s commentary about Islam and Muslims often misguided.  Both of these journalists, however, are also often thought provoking and insightful.  Regardless of how one views such writings, whether they match the world/political/social perspectives of others, the freedom to express opinions publicly without the fear of legal repercussions for doing so is a fundamental civil right of all Canadians.

Certainly, there are those who would find any criticism of a particular group or ideology offensive, yet it is not the place of such self-appointed guardians to protect me or my fellow citizens from opinions that may not match our own.  The hallmark of a free society is the right to hold contrary opinions and to express them in public.  For this reason, any attempt to censor so called hateful ideas by the use of the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal has no place in such a society.  Commentary that poses real risks to the lives of others can easily be dealt with by means of the Criminal Code of Canada. Using Sec. 13(1) of the Canadian Human Rights Act to accomplish the work of the Criminal Code is a blatant misuse of the laws of the land.  It is also, I suggest, a certain path to political tyranny of the majority to censor ideas and their expression.

Sincerely yours,

C.A. Shaw, Ph.D
1706 Deep Cove Road
North Vancouver, B.C.
V7G 1S5 Canada
Email: cashawlab@gmail.com

Christopher A. Shaw, Ph.D
Professor
Dept. of Ophthalmology
University of British Columbia
828 W. 10th Ave, Vancouver, BC,
V5Z 1L8
tel: 604-875-4111 (68373)

(more…)

ISRAEL’S APARTHEID WALL - THE RESULT OF RACIST ZIONISM

________________________________________________________

[Editor’s Note: The move by the French people to fight fire with fire as symbolized by this sensible, peaceful, democratic initiative to counter the devastating effects of political Zionism upon their once sovereign nation ought to be a inspiration to all other nations suffering under this restricting and debilitating yoke. I can only dream that Canada and the USA and Great Britain and Australia and especially Germany would be paying close attention to this laudable initiative on the part of the French people and in turn follow suit.

The danger to every democratic nation on Earth posed by this racist, apartheid political ideology is glaringly apparent to those who have been witness to the terrible, unjust deeds inflicted upon the Palestinian people of Gaza and Palestine proper over the past 60 years. Much of this tragedy has remained hidden from the west due to the complicity of the Zionist media in silencing both the actions of Israel and suppressing open debate and contrary information as well as efforts via specious lobby groups in the west such as the B’nai Brith and its arm known as the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) plus other Zionist groups such as the Canadian Jewish Congress here in this country to penalize and censor any criticism of the actions of this political ideology.

Maybe it time for Canada to come up with its own anti-Zionist political party. How about the “Canadian Anti-Zionist Party” (CAZP)? Simple and to the point. Upcoming political aspirants and Canadian sovereigntists and patriots please take note! ]

http://atheonews.blogspot.com/2009/03/new-anti-zionist-party-launched.html
France Launches New Anti-Zionist Political Party

March 13, 2009

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_TnDThSQGhrI/Sbpp_TeN7bI/AAAAAAAAAKE/XwkTDfzR84M/s1600-h/logo_fond_transparent.png
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_O3niSKklDTI/Sbmm9-2ZDZI/AAAAAAAAALE/J9K1MUBTdAk/s1600-h/logo_fond_transparent.png

Parti Anti Sioniste Logo
In an attempt to rid it’s country from the control of Zionist Lobby Groups and organizations, France has launched it’s new Anti Zionist Political Party called “Parti Anti Sioniste.” http://www.partiantisioniste.com/ Below are the party’s goals taken from a translated page:

EFFORTS AND AMBITIONS OF ANTI Zionist PARTY IN FRANCE

• To eliminate the Zionist interference in the affairs of the Nation.

• Denounce all the politicians who are advocating Zionism.

• Eliminating all forms of Zionism in the nation.

• Prevent companies and institutions to contribute to the war effort of a foreign nation that does not respect international law.

• Unleashing our state, our government and our institutions of the grip and the pressure of Zionist organizations.

• Unleashing the media for a plurality of information to promote freedom of expression.

• Promote the free expression of the politics, culture, philosophy and religion and free of Zionism.

• Restoring power in France and the French under the new geopolitical and economic rules on the big issues that engage the responsibility of the Nation.

• Do not engage France in the wars of colonization and repatriate our armed forces stationed in Africa, Afghanistan and around the world.

• Requiring a referendum for any new commitment of France abroad.

• Establish a bill to ban dual nationality to participate in war without explicit mandate of the Nation.

• Prohibit any militia whatever their faith.

• Establish a national dialogue to raise awareness and a society that excludes any advocacy of Zionism.

• Set the mode of voting by proportional representation so that all segments of society are represented.

• Advocate for the establishment of a society of justice, progress and tolerance.

——-

Translated Link HERE http://translate.google.co.uk/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.partiantisioniste.com%2F&sl=fr&tl=en&hl=en&ie=UTF-8

[Editor’s Note: The following letter of support for freedom of speech in Canada and the USA plus the article below it is an example of the type of response that RadicalPress.com is receiving from people around the world with regard to the complaint laid by B’nai Brith Canada.

It is hoped that you will find the time to read it through and pass it along to your friends and associates.

Mr. Fox is an American who believes very strongly and passionately in the same values which those of us in Canada also are fighting to defend. His list of nine major reasons for getting rid of “hate crime” laws is as enlightening as it is frightening for all concerned citizens who wish to be treated equally under the law.

If you haven’t written a letter in support of this issue I would please ask you to reconsider and put your shoulder to the wheel for a common and worthy cause. See http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=936 for information on the case and also http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=937 for a suggested form letter explaining how to frame a letter to the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal. We need as many letters of support as possible so please do your best to write. Thank you.]

——————————————————-

Nancy Lafontant
Registry Officer
Canadian Human Rights Tribunal

Dear Ms. Lafontant:

I consider it a great honor to be able to send a letter in support of the free speech rights of Arthur Topham, publisher of the Radical Press, whose persecution under Canada’s draconian “hate crime”-related laws is being registered under file number  T1360/9008.

I run the web site www.americafirstbooks.com http://www.americafirstbooks.com/ , in which I have archived the works of free speech activist Rev. Ted Pike at: http://tinyurl.com/44xyoo .  There is quite a lot of material on this web page that is relevant to this case.

First, it contains numerous articles that document the underhanded tactics of the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai Brith (an unregistered agent of Israel) to steal free speech rights under the guise of “hate crime” laws in America as well as Canada.

Secondly, numerous articles by Rev. Ted Pike and his niece Harmony Grant explain how the Canadian Human Rights Act is exactly the kind of Orwellian nightmare that we must avoid here in America at all costs.  For this reason, I spent more than two full days of my time recently calling up every member of the House Judiciary Committee in Washington, D.C. to make my own personal strenuous effort to try to defeat the currently proposed “hate crime” legislation.  An archived copy of the follow on email that I sent to Congressmen can be found here: http://tinyurl.com/bay6s4 .

Please watch Rev. Ted Pike’s ten minute video that explains the Trojan Horse nature of proposed hate crime legislation in America, and how similar legislation has subverted Canadian free speech:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c9Fyva1Vwbk&eurl=http://www.truthtellers.org/&feature=player_embedded .

At the end of this email I have reproduced the same essay that I submitted in my emails to Congressmen.  It is titled: “The Hate Crime Law Concept: It is all very sinister for at least nine major reasons.”

To put it bluntly, when it comes to the whole “hate crime” concept, the King wears no clothes. We should get all “hate crime” laws off the books and go back to being more free and civilized, as both Americans and Canadians were decades ago before all this Orwellian “hate crime” nonsense got snuck in through various Trojan Horse legislative initiatives.

(more…)

What’s Next, “Zionism Denial”?
By Arthur Topham
March 4, 2009

The recent shackling and incarceration of Horst Mahler in Germany over charges of “Holocaust Denial” is the latest example of the degree of absurdity that this trend by the Zionist forces is leading mankind toward.

There is now occurring, worldwide, an ideological war (vaguely masked as a ‘religious’ one) between the forces of darkness and deceit and the forces of light and truth. It’s as simple (and yet, as complex) as that.

Following upon the heels of the other absurdity of this nature, that of Bishop Richard Williamson and the grossness and degree of the attack upon his name and his position within the beleaguered Catholic hierarchy by the Zionist zealot rabbis and their lackeys whose raison d’etre rests upon a professed foundational belief in their false messiah – the Holocaust god – the myth of Sillyness is thus taken to the nth degree of frivolity.

The fact that Zionist Jews everywhere are now, in unison, screaming out their proverbial Molochian chants for Bishop Williamson’s blood and for him to not only recant his early remarks concerning the “Big Six” but to go further in demands he swear an unquestioning obedience and belief in their brash idol of ash, is one more startling illustration of the fact that these Mad Hatters of Holocaustasia will stop at nothing short of absolute obeisance to the object of their perpetual sorrow and worship.

Viewing this recent trend by the Zionist Jews to attack the intellectual challenges brought on by the apostles of common sense who have the audacity and courage to question their self-chosen postulates regarding the “Holocaust” with a barrage of legally restricting legislation specifically designed to thwart not only reason but justice itself, one can only ask the most obvious question – what next?

The answer to that simple and natural query – an outcome of witnessing the historic examples of James Keegstra, and Doug Collins and Malcolm Ross and Ernst Zundel in Canada, Professor Robert Faurisson in France, Germar Rudolf of the USA, Sylvia Stolz, Juergen Graf, Gerd Honsik and Horst Mahler of Germany, historian David Irving of England and Dr. Fredrick Toben of Adelaide Institute in Australia (to name but a few of the more notable figures) – is to be found in the current battle now unfolding in Canada between myself, Arthur Topham and my website RadicalPress.com and the Zionist Jew lobby organization known as the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada.

I am being charged by B’nai Brith Canada under Canada’s Sec. 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act – a vile and specious bit of Orwellian outrage if ever there was one – that uses Canada’s “Hate crimes” laws to suppress and vilify anyone who questions any aspects of either Judaism, the political ideology of Zionism or the policies of the foreign state of Israel.

As crazy and illogical as it might first appear, the actual wording of the charge brought against me and my website is living proof that the Zionists are determined to establish in this “Human Rights” complaint now before the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal, a new and unique precedent that goes beyond even the magnitude of the medieval malfeasance found in their “Holocaust Denial” legislation.

This novel precedent is to be found in the specific wording of the complaint itself which the Canadian Human Rights Commission, in their infinite wisdom, deemed admissible and worthy of holding a Tribunal hearing to debate. Using Section 13(1) and its Interpretation(2),  of the CHR Act, B’nai Brith Canada stated in its complaint to the CHRC:

“The premise of this complaint is a contention that Arthur Topham and Radicalpress.com contrive to promote ongoing hatred affecting persons identifiable as Jews and/or as citizens of Israel.” [bold is mine]

If this “complaint” reaches its planned goal it will firmly establish as law, in the once free nation known as Canada, that no citizen of said country will be able to write anything on the Internet that is critical of the state of Israel – (remembering of course that Israel is a foreign country) – without taking the risk of being charged with committing a “Hate crime” under Canada’s federal Canadian Human Rights Act.

As the world already knows, the essence of Israel, its life-blood, rests upon the ideology known as political Zionism. Without Zionism’s fundamental tenets the state would not, could not, exist as it does in its present form. Logic thus leads one to the obvious conclusion. If it becomes a “Hate crime” in Canada to criticize Israel then to do so make it de facto of the same order of “Holocaust Denial” only in this new instance we would have to refer to it as “Zionism Denial”.

I needn’t burden readers with the endless avenues leading into absurdity that such a precedent would set, not only for Canada but for every nation in which the Zionist Jewish influence has gained currency.

Those of us Canucks here in the trenches battling to stop censorship of the Internet and the repression of freedom of speech are well aware that Canada is the experimental breeding-ground for Zionist legislation which inevitably curtails serious debate of all relevant political issues related to Zionist Jewish influence on western culture and its underlying institutional framework.

All alliteration aside, once they are able to get in to the law books the RadicalPress.com v. B’nai Brith Canada precedent it will open up a plethora of pandemic, pusillanimous and pestilent-stricken precedents the likes of which will make Pandora’s Box appear petite by comparison.

And like all of the poisonous programs designed to control our thoughts and our means of expressing them, this current case, should it prove to be another Zionist victory, will soon wend its way south into the heart of America to then challenge that final bastion of freedom of speech contained in the US Constitution – the 1st Amendment.

The time to stem this stream of Orwellian misery currently building up head in Canada is NOW. The place, CANADA. The method? Kill this serpent of censorship hiding within Sec. 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act by severing its head before yet another false god, in this instance one called “Zionism Denial”, is born from out of the dark depths of Mordor and turns its fierce fangs toward the light bringers with increased vengeance and hatred.

The light will never be overcome by the darkness but only if the people open their eyes to the clear and present danger that Zionism poses to all those who love freedom.
——

To assist in this cause you might write a letter of support for RadicalPress.com and address it to:

Nancy Lafontant
Registry Officer
Canadian Human Rights Tribunal
Nancy.Lafontant@chrt-tcdp.gc.ca

Please refer to File Number: T1360/9008

Please visit http://www.radicalpress.com for more articles and information on this subject.
———–

Arthur Topham is the Publisher and Editor of RadicalPress.com. He lives in central B.C. Canada with his wife and family and has been at the forefront of issues regarding social justice for the past forty years. He can be reached at radical@radicalpress.com

HORST MAHLER - VICTIM OF ZIONIST LIES

______________________________________

“Words fall into the flames of injustice like raindrops into Hell’s inferno when I attempt to express my outrage at the scale and intent of this lie against humanity.”

- Arthur Topham

_________________________
Thursday, February 26, 2009
From:
“Völkische Reichsbewegung” info-hm@voelkische-reichsbewegung.org

Horst Mahler’s Closing Statement
Translated from the German by J M Damon

In My Show Trial Before Munich District Court II
Case No. 2 KLs 11 Js 42142/07

Closing Statement

The great mystery of human history has finally entered our consciousness as knowledge of Truth.

The passage of God through the world that He created is revealed to us as the eternal struggle within God Himself, as He participates in the struggle against evil on behalf of what we humans consider the Good. Through us, God thus becomes Absolute Spirit, which, transcending morality, is neither good nor bad.

Man cannot judge God. We can exist only as a Volk. Without a Volk, Man cannot exist as Man.

As Herder taught us, nations exist as thoughts of God. They have identity and significance only insofar as they can be distinguished from one another.

An orchestra consisting of nothing except violins would quickly bore the audience. Every Volk is a separate thought or concept of God and has the obligation to preserve itself as such, through all changes and vicissitudes.

It is the destiny of Judaism, the diffused nation within other nations, to exist as the spirit of negation. Without this spirit of negation God could not know what He is not as well as what He intends to be. Because it exists as the spirit of negation, Zion is and ever has been hated and shunned by all nations. (Book of Isaiah, Chap. 60, Verses 14 and 15).

In our (Christian) age, however, Zion has been redeemed by the nations through their acknowledgment of Judaism as “the negation of the lives of nations” (Martin Buber.)

Zion’s redemption began with Jesus’ words:

“You (the leaders of Zion) belong to your father, the devil, and you want to carry out your father’s desire.
He was a murderer from the beginning, not holding to the truth, for there is no truth in him.
When he lies, he speaks his native language, for he is a liar and the father of lies.
Because I tell the truth, you do not believe me!”
(John 8, 44-45)

As servants of God the Trinity, the Jews established the Empire of Mammon as a challenge and admonition for the nations of the Earth. The Empire of Mammon is now reaching its end, however. It has the lie of Jewish “gas chamber genocide” to thank for its culmination as well as its fall. The gas chamber or “Auschwitz Lie” was indeed the greatest lie in the history of mankind.

Now that the world monetary swindle has culminated and been exposed, the world is asking itself: “How could such a swindle have occurred?” It came about through international illusions about the role and the true nature of Judaism, in particular illusions about Jewish plutocrats. These illusions have now vanished, along with the make-believe homicidal gas chambers utilizing Cyclon B Insecticide at Auschwitz Concentration Camp. The Auschwitz Lie has finally run its course and the truth has triumphed.

The mighty protector of Israel, the United States of America, is disintegrating before our eyes, while the “Holocaust” Cult is devouring itself in ratlike fury by persecuting those who dare to expose it. If there were real empirical, forensic or documentary evidence for the unique crime that the Jewish-owned media call “Holocaust,” they would certainly have presented it long ago, and this would have enabled them to neutralize their skeptics with ridicule. But there is no such evidence, since no gas chamber genocide occurred.

It is incumbent upon companions of our Volk to deliver the death blow to the Judaic  “Holocaust” Cult, and this can be accomplished only through self-sacrifice. Until now we have been duped by the Jewish Media into opposing the compulsory “Holocaust” dogma under the banner of freedom of opinion. From now on, however, we are no longer restricted to struggling for human rights under this banner. Now there is more at stake than winning freedom to express opinions. The continuation of our existence as a German nation is at stake, the survival of our Volk.

Guilt kills the human spirit, as mankind has known since the pioneering discoveries by the Jewish scientist Sigmund Freud. Section 130 Paragraph 3 of the Criminal Code is more than a mere “muzzle” – it is a weapon for the spiritual destruction of our Volk, used in relentless attacks on our existence as a nation. Section 130 is illegal under international law. We are compelled to defend ourselves against it — and not just for our own sake. The German Volk is the light of the nations. We have a God-given obligation to keep it alive and beaming.

Germans must comprehend that, in the ancient Talmudic spirit, world Jewry is now attacking our right to defend ourselves and preserve our Volk with life imprisonment! Such drastic punishment is a good measure of their desperation. It has become necessary because Germans of sound character can no longer desist from speaking the truth and calling the Auschwitz Lie by its name.

Everyone  who acknowledges the right and the necessity of self-defense has a duty to oppose the Jewish genocide against the German spirit. The way to oppose this genocide is to speak the truth.

In our day, the German who does not kowtow to the Jews will be relentlessly brought before the courts and deprived of his freedom, so that he will spend his life behind bars. I stand convicted of exposing Talmudic perfidiousness by ceaselessly calling the Auschwitz Lie by its name and confronting it with the truth. I have been doing this for many years now, since I swore a sacred oath to my Volk never to relent in the struggle against the “Holocaust” Cult.

At the age of 73, I can expect to spend the rest of my days under the dictates of the foreign interests that dominate our Fatherland. 21 months of imprisonment have already been pronounced. In addition to this, the vassals of foreign domination in Potsdam District Court demand another 57 months while those in Munich demand 72 months. For a 73-year-old man, a sentence of twelve and a half years is life imprisonment.

Quod erat demonstrandum! [This is what had to be demonstrated.]

I ask my fellow Germans: do you want to languish forever?
Throw off the joke of Jacob!
We have the most powerful weapon of all, the Truth.
We must make use of it!

Munich, 25 February 2009

Treason doth never prosper, what’s the reason?
For if it prosper, none dare call it treason!
Sir John Harrington 1561-1612.
Here’s freedom to him who would speak,
Here’s freedom to him who would write;
For there’s none ever feared that the truth should be heard,
Save him whom the truth would indict!

Robert Burns (1759–96)
****************