Jews

World Jewish Congress approves resolution calling for criminalizing Holocaust denial

May 8, 2013 by admin Leave a Comment

http://theuglytruth.wordpress.com/2013/05/08/world-jewish-congress-approves-resolution-calling-for-criminalizing-holocaust-denial/

The resolution on anti-Semitism also calls countries where appropriate constitutional provisions exist to consider banning neo-Nazi parties.

[TUT Editor's Note: so, in other words, these same Jewish interests CONSTANTLY lecturing others on ‘free speech’ and CONSTANTLY warning of the dangers of ‘Islamic Shariah Law’ where people are punished for holding/voicing opinions contrary to the precepts of a certain religion are now calling for laws to be made criminalizing free speech/free thought as pertains the ‘holy of holies’–meaning the Holocaust.

As one famous philosopher stated over and over when warning of Jewish power, ‘beware the leaven of the pharisees, which is hypocrisy and lying’]

Haaretz

The World Jewish Congress approved on Tuesday a resolution that calls on countries around the world, “in particular those whose Jewish populations were decimated in the Shoah,” to outlaw the public denial of the Holocaust, and where appropriate constitutional provisions exist, to consider banning neo-Nazi parties.

The resolution also urges Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban and other national leaders and legislators in Europe to join the 125 legislators from more than 40 countries in signing the 2009 London Declaration on Combating Anti-Semitism.

The WJC decided to hold its Plenary Assembly in the Hungarian capital as an expression of solidarity with the local Jewish community in the city, who have been under threat of rising anti-Semitism ever since the extreme right-wing Jobbik Party won a relatively large share of the vote in the last election.

The WJC resolution, supported by hundreds of delegates from Jewish communities around the world, urges the Hungarian authorities “to take effective measures including by enacting and enforcing legislation, for the protection of all citizens and residents of this country, in particular vulnerable minorities such as the Roma and the Jews, against threats of violence, racist hate and insults and the denial of the Holocaust.”

On Sunday night, the Hungarian prime minister opened the Plenary Assembly promising to act more forcefully against anti-Semitism, although he did not specifically mention the Jobbik Party, which captured 17 percent of the vote in the 2010 election. WJC officials expressed disappointment with his speech, which to their minds lacked substance.

In the resolution, the WJC calls on Hungary “to recognize that the ideology and the actions of the Jobbik movement and its subsidiaries, including the New Hungarian Guard, pose a fundamental threat to Hungary’s democracy, and that decisive action by all democratic forces against these contemporary expressions of extremism must now be taken.”

The resolution also expresses concern about recent signs of rising anti-Semitism in Ukraine.

Earlier today, the Plenary Assembly heard about a new legislative initiative in Greece, which promises a radical crackdown on anti-Semitism and other forms of racism in the country. David Saltiel, the head of the country’s Jewish community, who reported on the development, said the legislation will be submitted to parliament in the coming days, following the Easter holiday break.

According to the legislation, any individual or group that incites against or acts violently toward other individuals or groups “because of their racial origin, the color of their skin, their religion and/or their sexual preferences” could be punished with three months to six years in jail and be fined up to 20,000 euros. The same punishments would apply to Holocaust denial and the National Socialist salute. The legislation also stipulates that if a parliamentary party chief is found to be in violation, public funding for his or her party would be suspended.

———

Filed Under: "Canadian Parliamentary Coalition to Combat Anti-Semiti, "hate speech", "Jewish" holocaust, 6 Million Myth, Aboriginal Issues Can/U.S., Abrams/BBC v. Arthur Topham & RadicalPress.com, Adolf Hitler, Editor's Zone, Haaretz, Holocaust denial, HOLODOMOR, Hungarian Jobbik Party, Jewish Censorship, Jewish Hatred, Jewish Holocaust Industry, Jewish Holocaust Lie, Jewish Lobby Groups, Jewish Media Monopoly, Jewish Racism, Jewish Supremacism, Jewish Terrorists, Jews, London Declaration on Combating Anti-Semitism., National Socialism, Nazis, Neo-Nazi parties, Occupy Movement, Palestine, Political Prisoners, Political Zionism, World Jewish Congress (WJC), World Zionist Organization

How Many Jews? by Douglas Reed

April 30, 2013 by admin 1 Comment

How Many Jews?

Douglas Reed

[Editor's Note: The issue involving the "6 Million Jews" purported to have been gassed and roasted (holocausted) in German concentration camps during WWII continues to be hotly debated within the alternative media sixty-eight years after the war's end. In the case of the Jewish media aka the msm, their ongoing insistence on repeatedly reinforcing their own self-chosen figure of 6 million well after being proven to be historically inaccurate has created greater and greater skepticism on the part of truth-seekers everywhere who, now thanks to the Internet and the freeing up of the facts and the hidden information surrounding this controversy, are realizing that the 6 million lies of the Jews is nothing but Zionist Jew propaganda designed to buttress their failed attempt at mesmerizing and brainwashing the world into believing the greatest lie ever told throughout recorded history.

One of the earliest debunkers of the 6 million myth was British war correspondent and author Douglas Reed. Having lived through WWI and covered WWII in depth Reed was well aware of the historic context in which he lived and wrote. His comments below on the impossibility of ascertaining with any accuracy the actual number of Jews supposedly living in Europe from 1939 until 1945 are taken from Chapter 42 of his 1956 classic, The Controversy of Zion and give the reader a much needed reference point from which to judge just who is more correct when it comes to this ongoing clash over how many Jews died during WWII.]

from
Chapter 42
The Talmudic Vengeance

The trials of “war criminals” formed the peaks of the vengeance and the Everest of them all was reached in the Nuremberg trial of the chief Nazi leaders….

By the choice of the Jewish Day of Judgment for the hanging of the Nazi leaders and German commanders the Western leaders gave the conclusion of the Second War this aspect of a vengeance exacted specifically in the name of “the Jews.” The shape which the trial took showed the purpose of the immense propaganda of falsification conducted during the war, which I have earlier described. “Crimes against Jews” were singled out as a separate count, as if Jews were different from other human beings (and when the judgment was delivered a hundred million human beings in Eastern Europe had been handed over to the general persecution of all men, from which Jews in their proportion suffered in Germany). This particular indictment was made “the crux of the case” against the defendants (Captain Liddell Hart’s words) and was based on the assertion that “six million Jews” had been killed (as time went by the word “perished” was substituted for “killed”). An impartial court would at the outset have thrown out any suit based on this completely unverifiable assertion: At Nuremberg lawyers, who in a private case would have demanded acquittal on the strength of an unproven statement in respect of a decimal point or digit, used this fantastic figure as the basis of their demand for conviction.

I earlier described, with illustrations from Jewish sources, the process by means of which, over the years, the Jews were “singled out” from the mass of Hitler’s victims and their number inflated at will from day to day (Hitler’s book-bonfire became “the burning of Jewish books”; his concentration camps where ninety percent of the inmates were Germans became concentration camps for Jews; a wartime report about the killing of” 150,000 White Russians, Ukrainians and Jews at Kieff” was changed to “150,000 Jews”; and so on interminably).

The statement about the “six million Jews,” allowed to pass without question by the men on the bench, was the end-product of this process. In six years of war the Germans, Japanese and Italians, using every lethal means, killed 824,928 British, British Commonwealth and American fighting-men, merchant sailors and civilians. Assuming that the Germans killed, say, half of these in Europe, they killed (according to this assertion) fifteen times as many Jews there. To do that, they would have needed such quantities of men, weapons, transports, guards and materials as would have enabled them to win the war many times over.

The figure would not even deserve scrutiny if it had not been used to give the Second War the brand of “a Jewish war” and if that, again, did not foreshadow the shape of any third war. Because of that, it may be examined here.

At no time in history, from antiquity to this day, can the number of Judahites, Judeans or Jews, living at any given time, be determined; for that reason the number afflicted in any calamity also cannot be determined, and there are many more reasons why the number of Jewish victims in the Second World War cannot be fixed. The process of mystification begins in Genesis and continues through the Torah (the seventy people taken by Jacob to Egypt, for instance, apparently increased to two or three million within 150 years). At all periods large, and sometimes huge variations occur in the “estimates,” and only estimates are possible, as the present term, “Jew,” is legally indefinable and statistically elusive.

An eminent Jewish authority, Dr. Hans Kohn, in his article on “the distribution of Jews” in the Encyclopaedia Britannica Book of the Year for 1942, writes:

“In view of the fact that in several of the countries where the largest number of Jews were living in 1941 the census did not contain any questions regarding religion … the exact number of Jews in the world in 1941 could not be ascertained. The definition of persons falling under the classification of ‘Jewish race’ is in no way agreed upon … In countries where the census included questions of religious origins, even this religious criterion of Jewish faith is difficult to define exactly. Thus the assumption which generally varied around the figure of 16 million” (for the entire world) “cannot claim any foundation on exact ‘figures. To this uncertainty about the number of Jews in the world was added in recent years a growing uncertainty about their numerical distribution in the different countries and continents. Probably more than 6,000,000 Jews lived in Poland and the U.S.S.R.”

A weaker basis than that even for “estimates” (not to speak of “statistics”) can hardly be imagined, yet in the ensuing period, when all the additional confusions of war and occupation were piled on this infirm foundation, precise numbers of Jewish casualties were produced day by day, circulated by thousands of assiduous propagandists, and at the end declared to amount to six millions!

Dr. Kohn says that “probably” more than 6,000,000 Jews lived in Poland and U.S.S.R. in 1941. In respect of the U.S.S.R. this might corroborate another Jewish authority (Prof. H.M.T. Loewe), who said in the Encyclopaedia Britannica of 1937 that 2,700,000 Jews then lived there. Similarly, four years earlier (1933) the Jewish journal Opinion had stated that the Jewish population of the U.S.S.R. was under 3,000,000; and the Soviet official Encyclopaedia in 1953 stated that “the Jewish population of the Soviet Union in 1939 was 3,020,000.”

This near agreement among four authorities in respect of the period 1933-1941 might lead the reader to think that the number of Jews in one country at least (the U.S.S.R.) was established with reasonable accuracy at a given time. On the contrary, this is a statistical jungle where nothing is ever established. In 1943 the Jewish Commissar Mikhoels said in London (according to the Johannesburg Jewish Times of 1952), “Today we have in the Soviet Union 5,000,000 Jews.” That is two million more than two years before, and if it was true presumably meant that most of the Jews in Poland, after Hitler and Stalin fell out, moved into Soviet territory. However, in the same issue of the Jewish Times a leading Jewish writer, Mr. Joseph Leftwich, stated that the Jewish population of the U.S.S.R. in 1952 was 2,500,000, “a loss since 1943 of 2,500,000.” He asked, “where and how did they disappear?”; the answer, in my judgment, is that most of them disappeared into the statistics.

That is not the end of the confusion in this one section of the question. The Encyclopaedia Britannica of 1937 (in giving the above-cited figure of 2,700,000 Jews in Russia on Jewish authority) said they formed about six percent of the total population. The total population was elsewhere given in the same encyclopaedia as 145,000,000 and six percent of that would be 8,700,000!

The encyclopaedias, statistical yearbooks and almanacs are in this one question all at odds with each other and untrustworthy. I could multiply examples (for instance, the Jewish World Congress in 1953 announced that the Jewish population of the U.S.S.R. was 1,500,000) but wandering in a maze without an outlet is profitless. All published figures are “estimates” made at the estimators’ pleasure, and are without value. A professional accountant might write a book on the efforts of the encyclopaedists to make the post-war figure of Jewish population in the world conform with the pre-war “estimates,” minus six million. Figures are tricky things: a few examples:

The leading American reference yearbook, the World Almanac, in 1947 gave the 1939 Jewish world-population as 15,688,259. In later editions up to 1952 it increased this prewar estimate (without explanation) by a million, to 16,643,120. It gave the 1950 population as 11,940,000, which, if subtracted from the first figure given for 1939, gives a reduction of nearly four millions (though not of six). However, it based even this “estimate” on another estimate, namely, that in 1950 the Jewish population of the U.S.S.R. was 2,000,000. This still left unanswered Mr. Leftwich’s question in respect of Commissar Mikhoels’s statement, that in 1943 the Jewish population of the U.S.S.R. was 5,000,000.

In England Whitaker’s Almanac, of similar eminence, struggled with the same problem. In its 1949 and 1950 issues it gave the 1939 “estimated” Jewish world population as 16,838,000 and that of 1949 as 11,385,200, a reduction of nearly 5,500,000. However, the figures given for Jewish population in separate countries added up to 13,120,000 (not 11,385,200). Incidentally, Whitaker’s in 1950 gave the Jewish population of the U.S.S.R. as 5,300,000, against the World Almanac’s figure for the same year, of 2,000,000.

Both these publications are of the highest repute for painstaking accuracy and the fault is not theirs; in this one matter alone only Jewish “estimates” are available, and for obvious reasons no dependence can be placed on these. I pointed out the discrepancies in a book of 1951 and observed that Whitaker’s in 1952 no longer contained these “estimates of Jewish populations”; apparently it had abandoned the statistical quest as hopeless, and was right to do so. Another encyclopaedia in its 1950 edition also dropped the subject.

Finally, the New York Times, which may be described as the world’s leading Jewish newspaper (it is Jewish-owned and New York is today primarily a Jewish city) in 1948 published what claimed to be an authoritative statistical article, computing the Jewish population of the world (three years after the war’s end) between 15,700,000 and 18,600,000. If either figure was near truth this meant that the Jewish world-population had remained stationary or increased during the war years.

Newspaper articles are soon forgotten (unless some diligent student preserves them) but the great propagandist fabrications are handed on. Thus the historians, those men of precision in other questions, passed on the legend of “mass-extermination” to posterity. At the war’s end Professor Arnold J. Toynbee was producing his monumental Study of History and in its eighth volume (1954) said that “the Nazis … reduced the Jewish population of Continental Europe, west of the Soviet Union, from about 6,5 million to about l,5 million by a process of mass-extermination.” He called this “a bare statistical statement” and then added a footnote showing that it was not a statistical statement: “it is not possible to give exact figures based on accurate statistics and it seemed improbable in 1952 that the necessary information would ever be obtainable.” Professor Toynbee explains that his figure was based on Jewish “calculations, in which there were several possible sources of error.” He concludes that “it might be estimated” that five million Continental Jews had been done to death by the Nazis.

The estimate is historically valueless. The starting-point for consideration of this question is the fact that six million Jews, or anything approaching that number, cannot possibly have been “done to death” or caused to “perish,” for the reasons given at the start of this discussion; the very assertion, made before the Nuremberg court, was an affront to their 825,000 fighting-men, sailors and civilians, killed in all theatres of war, of which only the Western politicians of this century would have been capable.

The number of Jews who were killed or perished will never be known, for the reasons already stated and partly discovered by Professor Toynbee in his footnote to history. The very term “Jew” is indefinable; Jews are often not isolated in statistics; and at no time can the number of living Jews in the world be ascertained with any approach to accuracy. Indeed, any attempt to reach statistical clarity through census or immigration data is attacked as “discrimination” and “anti-semitism.” For instance:

“Immigrants seeking to settle in Australia will from now on not be asked on application forms if they are Jewish, it was made known in Sydney by the executive committee of Australian Jewry, which protested against this practice to the immigration authorities” (the Jewish Times, Johannesburg). In England, “it is impossible, in the absence of official statistics, to do more than make an intelligent guess … the exact number of Jews in Britain remains a mystery” (the Zionist Record, Johannesburg). In America, President Roosevelt was brought under unremitting pressure to abolish the requirement to state “Jewish” on immigration forms, and in 1952 a major campaign was waged by the Anti-Defamation League and the American Jewish Committee against the McCarran-Walter Act because it sought to restore this requirement. This act was in the event passed over President Truman’s veto, but even a rigorous application of the reinstated requirement would not lead to clarification, as applicants, if they wish, may insert “British” or any similar description, instead of “Jewish.”

This state of statistical affairs is now well-nigh universal, so that the whole question is a mystery and has deliberately been made one. None can even guess the number of Jews whose deaths, during the war, were not natural or the result of bombing and the like, but who were done to death by the Nazis. My opinion is that, whatever was the number of Jews in the countries overrun by Hitler, the number of their victims was in roughly that proportion to the total population stricken, Polish, Czech and other. I have found this to be the opinion of all persons known to me who survived the concentration camps and occupations. Having suffered themselves, their feeling for Jewish victims was as strong as for all others, but they could not understand why the one case of the Jews was singled out and the number of Jewish victims monstrously exaggerated.
——-

Filed Under: "Jewish" holocaust, 6 Million Myth, Douglas Reed, Editor's Zone, HOLODOMOR, Jewish Holocaust Industry, Jewish Holocaust Lie, Jewish Media Monopoly, Jews, Jews Behind Bolshevik Revolution, National Socialism, Nazis, Nuremberg Trial, Political Zionism, The Controversy of Zion, The Gulag Archipelago, The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion

Sweden: Bishop (member of billionaire Jewish media dynasty) wants to censor and edit the Christian Bible

April 28, 2013 by admin Leave a Comment

http://blog.balder.org/?p=1565

Jewish Bishop behind Bible falsification
Sweden: Bishop (member of billionaire Jewish media dynasty) wants to censor and edit the Christian Bible
By Balder
April 26, 2013

Bishop Aake Bonnier – Sweden

The Bishop in Skara Stift in Sweden, Aake Bonnier, has become an advocate for falsifying the Bible, since he thinks that the Bible ought to be edited in such a way, that every piece of criticism of the Jews is removed from the Christian Bible.

He allegedly wants to remove the anti-Semitism of Christianity, and he has chosen deception as his tool. That was not very smart, for if one begins with cheating, the project will of course never be accepted.

Aake (Åke) Bonnier was born into the wealthy Jewish publishing family, and he has converted to Christianity, but perhaps he was not all that sincere, taking his latest anti Christian project into account.

Bonnier demands that the Swedish Church stops its alleged Christian misinterpretation of Biblical texts about Jews and Judaism, and cleanse the Christian Liturgy of any type of anti Jewish perspective.

Church to deny difference between Old and New Testament

And even more outrageous, he wants the Church to deny the crucial difference between the Old and the New Testament! This demand practically means that the Church is to give up the meaning of the coming of Christ, the very core event in the New Testament.

That Bishop Aake Bonnier’s project is outrageous and mad, is obvious for many Christian Swedes, but sadly he is protected by his enormous fortune and that of his family; more specifically his family’s influence in the Swedish press has shielded him from a lot of public criticism he otherwise would have been subjected to.

The Church ought to purify itself by excommunicating the false Christian Aake Bonnier, who intends to attack the very soul of Christianity with a forged Bible. But Aake Bonnier’s outrageous attempt to create a falsification of the Bible, sadly enough is not the first time this has been tried.

Quote from Kristeligt Dagblad June 6. 2007:

‘The politically correct Bible, which was published in Germany in the autumn of 2006, is now being heavily criticized by the Evangelical Church in Germany’ [Not to be confused with the American group with the same name].

The character of the Bible and its language makes it unsuitable for services in the Evangelical Church. Martin Luther’s translation will continue to be the most important text during services, the Council of the Evangelical Church said in a press statement, where the Evangelical Church distances itself from the new politically correct ‘translation’ of the Bible.

About 1200 sponsors and the Evangelical Church in Hessen and Nassau have financed the publication of the politically correct Bible. For five long years 52 men and woman have been working on the translation. The result is a text where men and woman are pictured as equal, and where there are no negative depictions of Jews and minorities.

This must be the worst form of deceit known to men. Falsifying the Bible in order ‘to protect Jews and minorities’.

Jerusalem Post – Ovadia Yosef |

This is an excellent example of what kind of evil individuals these politically correct people are. They don’t even stop at falsifying the Bible, the Holy Book, such big and evil heretics and criminals they are, and just because they themselves don’t care about the Word, they think that ordinary Europeans have completely forgotten what the Bible actually says.

In the News Testament of the Christian Bible, there is no doubt that the Jews turned against Christ, and that they are to blame for his death, and no falsifications and fraud can change these facts, whether one likes it or not, and there are millions of Christians all around the world, who know quite well what the Bible says.

—–

By Kaj Vilhelmsen / some minor edits and right hand column additions by Balder

Source:
?Nationaldemokraten 25 april 2013 – Biskop Åke Bonnier bag bibelforfalskning (Kaj Vilhelmsen)

Filed Under: Balder's Blog, Christian Zionists, Christianity, Christians, Editor's Zone, Jewish Bishop Aake Bonnier, Jews

The Real Terror is the Law by John Kaminski

April 28, 2013 by admin Leave a Comment

The Real Terror is the Law

Hear the chant of the mindless monster — ‘USA! USA!’

NOW YOU CAN BE EXECUTED
FOR MERELY BEING A SUSPECT

By John Kaminski
pseudoskylax@gmail.com
https://therebel.org/kaminski

One thing is certain. It is the cops who are committing the crimes.

In the name of terror, they brutalize the public with concocted fantasies and real episodes of self-destructive social sadism.

And in the name of national security, they mislead everyone into believing that crimes are being committed when in reality the cops are creating the crimes themselves, staging “drills” that turn into live events, hiring “crisis actors” to pose as victims, and feeding false information to media maggots ever eager to fan the flames of fear.

Now you can be executed — as we have just learned — for merely being a suspect — with no evidence, no trial, and no finding of guilt, but only by the hysteria generated by the false testimony of the cops amplified and spread throughout the world by corrupt media.

This is how the recently enacted National Defense Authorization Act works in real time.

The cops can commit constant perjury and remain immune from prosecution because the legal system, totally awash in corruption, protects them, while the gullible public, believing what they hear on TV, puts their hands across their hearts and chants “USA USA” without ever really comprehending the deeper reality of what is going on.

This is the new anthem signifying uncritical endorsement of fear and criminal behavior wherever it is heard — “USA! USA!”

It is a blood libel against all of humanity. No one is safe from it, not even the people practicing it for a paycheck nor the social strategists inventing it for purposes of control.

The cops are supposed to protect us, but their mission has curdled. They have turned the law into a weapon of mass murder.

Now, everyone is a criminal and you’re guilty until proven innocent. Babies are being snatched from their parents for not submitting their newborns to poisoned vaccinations. The new Gov. Cuomo in New York has just signed a law that all psychiatric records are now the property of the government.

There is no longer any such thing as doctor-patient confidentiality, which means your life is no longer your own.

Now, they’re creating crimes rather than fighting them, just as doctors now create diseases rather than eliminating them. Can you say “swine flu shot” without choking on the phrase?

Now, when you go to a doctor, you are committing a crime against yourself, by jeopardizing your own freedom by challenging new laws that spawn the real terror in the world. Our demonic President Obama has pontificated that he can kill anyone he wants without a trial at any time for any reason. The day has already arrived when people, especially parents, are being put in jail for refusing vaccines. How much worse can it get?

Be certain that it will.

Some people don’t care. Others are simply not capable of understanding.

The rest of us who are aware to one degree or another endlessly troll the Internet for each new depravity, wondering in astonishment how we could have sunk so far so fast, how we could have permitted all these evil actions and trends to flourish, and grow progressively worse with each passing day.

It’s no exaggeration to say the future of America and the world hangs in the balance. It is the people who don’t care who control the fate of the world.

Those who will decide whether we all live or die are people who really don’t want to know the truth, who don’t care whether the government is killing its own citizens, who just want to be left alone with their addictions, compulsions, and delusions, with their favorite TV shows and self-destructive jobs.

Those who just want to watch football, go shopping, and eat pizza.

Preaching to the choir doesn’t work. It only sinks those of us who are aware more deeply into depression and frustration. Too many of us now realize it is the people who don’t care who matter most. It is up to us to convince them, and we haven’t.

Convince them of what?

That the information they receive shapes their lives, and prejudices every decision they make in their lives with deliberately falsified facts.

The question of freedom in the minds of Americans hangs on the question of whether or not the U.S. government is killing its own citizens to achieve total control of everyone’s mind, thereby eliminating the possibility of dissent. TV news is shaped to the same purpose.

The notion of freedom in America precariously teeters on the question of whether the government is deliberately killing its own citizens to achieve the goals of the rich power brokers.

People who stock up on guns, bulk food and ham radios are just fooling themselves. You can’t win a firefight with the American war machine. And you can’t survive with any degree of health amid a society that has gone totally rancid.

The lady who lost her legs on Boylston Street doesn’t know about Waco. But no lady lost her legs in the staged Boston Marathon massacre. IT WAS A DRILL. She was an amputee hired as a crisis actor, and she did her job well. What a thrill it must be to know she helped the cops make everybody more afraid.

What a sick society. This is the ultimate outcome of not paying attention to the forces who control our lives. This is what happens when we let someone else usurp responsibility for our own lives.

Reality has separated into two parts. It has bifurcated into two levels of consciousness, one that thinks and one that doesn’t. One that reacts to made-up terror dramas and cringes in fear, and one that gathers real facts and ineffectually rails against injustice.

The one thing that is never mentioned is the real cause of all the problems. Because it is against the law to be mentioned, the problems never get solved. The problems only get worse. And the true cause is never identified openly.

For the last two decades, terrorist incidents like blown-up buildings and mass shootings at schools have proliferated. These are what has caused the need for “terror drills” in the first place.

In recent days, after alleged mass shootings at Aurora and Sandy Hook, plus the Boston Marathon bombing, numerous courageous writers have diligently uncovered the scams, pointed out the inconsistencies, and chronicled the shifting cover stories.

But, again, conspicuous by its absence has been any mention of the real cause.

The Jewish penetration and subversion of reality.

(I notice with fear and loathing that Jewish writers have pretty much taken over the opposition, providing Jewish solutions to problems created by Jews in the first place.)

Few people have actually noticed that ever since the assassination of President William McKinley way back in the year 1900, the real cause of all these tragic public events throughout the 20th century — the passage of the Federal Reserve Act, the Great Depression, both World Wars, Vietnam, Oklahoma City, 9/11 and the endless succession of terror bombings, the constant attacks and obliteration of the Muslim countries, and most recently the Aurora, Sandy Hook and the Boston Marathon sideshows — have all been devised and carried out by the same evil source — cops trained in Israel and soldiers who act without thinking about their immortal souls.

But this source of endless terror is never mentioned, because this same source controls virtually all public media in the world, controls every aspect of it, in ways we still haven’t completely perceived, such as gangsta rap, free sex and the legalization of drugs.

That source is the Jewish mafia, which has perverted our schools, lobotomized our media, perverted our social institutions through non-profit think tanks, and prostituted our children with poisoned drugs and depraved subversive trends masquerading as personal liberation.

And if you do mention it, you probably don’t get published, unless you’re reading discontented sites like this one, hard to find, marginalized, and ridiculed by people who don’t really know what they’re talking about, yet who insist they do, because they got their information from sources who never mention the magic word.

Lawyers collude against their clients, doctors poison their own patients, teachers fill their students’ minds with crap they know is false — this suicidal course was all created by the Jews, just like the erudite commentators who continue to insist Muslims blew up the Twin Towers, white people have plundered the world and deserve to be offed, and you can live a happy life is you just take this bribe, or take this drug, and forget about the rest of it, because there’s nothing you can do about anyway.

Please notice how all the presidential assistants are Jews, how all the lawyers and doctors who craft new laws that threaten our lives are Jews, and how all elected officials are in thrall to the Jews because that’s the only way they can acquire the loans to get themselves elected.

Please notice how all the people on Wall Street who have stolen trillions from the American people are Jews, who read the news on TV and justify government oppression are Jews, and who draw enormous salaries from the government for jobs that don’t really need to exist are Jews or Jew slaves.

Please notice how any news source that forbids the use of the word “Jew” should never be trusted, because it means they are spouting propaganda that has been screened by the Jews, or at least, by not mentioning them, are generally speaking in fear of the Jews.

And most importantly, please notice how any news source that speaks of terrorists as a genuine entity— and specifically the fictional creation known as Al-Qaeda — is simply vomiting Jewish propaganda, because Al-Qaeda is the false flag creation of Zbigniew Brzezinski, the Mossad, and the CIA, and is now successfully spreading to every corner of the world as EITHER the reason for the need for military action by armies that the Jews control, or as allies against countries that the Jews want to destroy.

Such convenient terrorists they are, used to fight EITHER for us or against us, depending on what the situation demands. In Afghanistan, they were the targets of our bombs; but in Libya, they were the deliverers of our bombs.

It’s the people who don’t care who matter most now, because they are the ones who uncritically believe the hip but misleading jargon they hear on TV and give the government the excuse it needs to continue its slick deceptions that sicken the general public and spread profit-making diseases across the planet.

It’s the people who don’t care who control the fate of the world, and it’s up to us who do care to convince them that they must care, that the real terror is the law, and that the real criminals are our leaders, and the cops who follow their criminal orders. Without the people who don’t care realizing their indifference is leading to our destruction, we are unquestionably doomed to a painful and diseased oblivion.

So if you understand this message, get to work, because only numbers — and I’m talking tens of millions of people demanding the trial and execution of all these killer millionaires who fix elections and avoid paying taxes with overseas bank accounts — can at this late date hope to save our world and our lives.

Get the Jews out of government, out of schools, out of our minds. As Ben Franklin predicted so long ago, our children will curse us in our graves if we let the Jews sabotage and destroy our country, which they have already pretty much accomplished.

But as long as we don’t give up our guns, stop going to doctors, and never trust the Jewish-dominated mainstream media, it’s not too late to stop them.

The key is getting the people who don’t care to understand that the future of humanity — the whole shooting match — depends on them waking up to the sorry fact that they are being systematically robbed and killed by organizations that are supposed to protect them and make them healthy, but are doing exactly the opposite.

Given the debauched and debilitated condition of the gullible boobs who populate the United States, I concede this is a tall order. Unfortunately, the only alternative is the Jewish program of mass deception and extermination that is already well under way, and has been for at least a hundred years.
__________

John Kaminski is a writer who lives on the Gulf Coast of Florida, constantly trying to figure out why we are destroying ourselves, and pinpointing a corrupt belief system as the engine of our demise. Solely dependent on contributions from readers, please support his work by mail: 6871 Willow Creek Circle #103, North Port FL 34287 USA.

https://therebel.org/kaminski
http://johnkaminski.info/
http://www.rudemacedon.ca/kaminski/kam-index.html
http://web.archive.org/web/20040323232319/http://johnkaminski.com/

Filed Under: 'Al Qaeda', 911, American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), Anti-Defamation League (ADL), B'nai Brith International, Barack Obama, Boston Marathon bombing, Editor's Zone, Free Speech on the Internet, Hate Crime laws, Israeli Terrorism, Israeli War Crimes, Jewish Crime, Jewish Hatred, Jewish Holocaust Lie, Jewish Lobby Groups, Jewish Media Monopoly, Jewish power, Jewish Racism, Jewish Supremacism, Jewish Terrorists, Jews, Jews Behind Bolshevik Revolution, John Kaminski, League for Human Rights of B'nai Brith Canada, Mossad, Oklahoma City bombing, Rothschild Banking syndicate, Rothschild Zionist Criminal Cartel, The Babylonian Talmud, The Controversy of Zion, The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, The Synagogue of Satan, Wall Street, World Zionist Organization, Zbigniew Brzezinski, Zionist Atrocities

The Trial of Guenter Deckert by Sylvia Stolz (English translation by Christine B. Miller)

April 26, 2013 by admin 1 Comment

The Trial of Guenter Deckert

By Sylvia Stolz

Translated from the German language
by Christine Miller

“A prison sentence will not force me into believing.”
~ Guenter Deckert

“When I have doubts I demand the right to express them …They talk about tolerance, but mean the inquisition. … The hunt to find incorrect literature pretending to fight crime. For a short time people can be intimidated by the threat of punishment, but the brain continues to reason.”

Thus spoke Guenter Deckert in his final comment at his sentencing February, 2012 in front of the state court Mannheim. The report of his trial follows.

Since January 2, 2013 Guenter has been in prison on account of aiding and abetting so-called Holocaust denial. We accompanied him on his journey to prison and took leave of him at the Mannheim prison gate.

We expressed our thanks for his courage and his commitment to freedom, justice and truth. We will always remember that. The day will come when the Germans and other people will appreciate his zeal.

He is supposed to be released May 2013. We will be there waiting for him starting at nine o’clock.
Address: Herzogenriedstrasse 111, 68169 Mannheim. Whoever wants to be there and greet him is cordially invited.

The Opinion Terror

By Sylvia Stolz

A prison sentence for doubting the “Holocaust.”

No probation for expressing one’s opinion in these times of alleged “right wing terror.”

In these times of the “resurfacing” of right wing extremism which, without question, is due to the criminal deeds of the alleged “NSU”, Holocaust denial constitutes a considerable danger for public peace.

Guenter Deckert, former high school teacher, on February 2, 2012 was sentenced by the state court of Mannheim to a prison sentence of six months without probation on account of aiding and abetting so-called Holocaust denial. As well, because of the “radical” law and in spite of high evaluations he was dismissed from his high school teaching job in November, 1988 in the State of Baden-Wuertenberg and was denied his pension.

He is charged with having cooperated in the translation into German of the book by Carlo Mattogno, Auschwitz – the First Gassings, Rumors and Reality (December, Castle Hill Publishers.)

On July 28, 2010 Guenter Deckert had been sentenced by the lower court of Weinheim to a prison term of 4 months with probation. The charges were: promotion of incitement of the public by means of Holocaust denial and defamation of the memory of the dead. (&&130 III, IV, 189 STGB-BRD. Aktenzeichen: 2Ds 503 Js 14219/08 – AK 579/09).

The prosecutor appealed and on February 2, 2012 the sentence by the state court of Mannheim was increased to six months without probation. Guenter Deckert’s appeal was thrown out (Aktenzeichen: 12Ns 503 Js 14219/08)

Many people in the BRD (Germany), the BRO (Austria), Switzerland, France, Spain, Greece and other countries have been sentenced because they denied or doubted the Holocaust when defined as systematic genocide. At times very high prison sentences have been handed down. For example the sentence against lawyer Horst Mahler.

The Holocaust is not defined

During his appeal Guenter Deckert wanted to know the concrete facts which he, according to the accusations, deliberately ignored and the truth he contested. He received no answer.

It is especially telling that the so-called “Holocaust” is not legally defined (This is against the principal of the penal law). In the first trial no concrete facts as to the place of the crime, the methods of killing or other proofs, directly or indirectly presented in the findings of other trials, were presented.

Concerning his denial the court pointed to &130 section 3StGB , &6 section of the international penal law which defines genocide as being when a member of an ethnic or religious group is killed with the intent to destroy or partially destroy the whole group. According to &130 section 3StGB i.V.m &6 section VStGB people can be punished who deny that under the rule of National Socialism, without knowledge or intent of the German Reichsregierung, a Jew, by someone or another (even by a none German), had been killed with the intent to partially destroy Jewry as an ethnic and religious group.

“Known to the court” to be challenged”

Guenter Deckert at the beginning of his appeal made the following motion:

“I move for the court to discuss point by point the principles on which the court rests its “known to the court” facts which, since the beginning of the Seventies of the Twentieth Century, generally go under the notation “Holocaust.”

The court should establish if and how far the persons who are called to judge have knowledge of these “facts” or only base their judgment on hearsay or secondary literature.”

Before coming to a decision about this motion the court should take into consideration the resolution by the petition caucus of the German Bundestag (upper house) Pet 12-4-07-45-5699 Deutscher Bundestag 12. election period – print 12/2849.

An excerpt: During a main trial the court is duty bound to discuss those facts of which the court has taken judicial notice in order to give the accused the opportunity to contest them. In addition it has to be acknowledged that “known to the court” does need to exist in perpetuity or has to remain unchanged. New information might have been gotten and new events might have happened which will bring about a different conclusion. If the accused presents such circumstances which in the past have not been mentioned or discussed the “known to the court” can be challenged and new proofs concerning these facts have to be considered. In this way the accused and his defender have the possibility to counter “it is known to the court.”

The decision concerning “it is “known to the court” & 244 lies therefore exclusively in the hands of the court in question and is subject to the principle of independence in respect to judges. It is also possible that in individual cases a different judgment may be the result.”

Judgment based on the media

Concerning “it is known to the court” the following decisions have been made: (…)

The county court Bernau presided over by the female judge Kroh rejected the motion to discuss the principles of “known to the court,” stating that the facts and the legal situation were the same. She simply gave judicial notice that during the National Socialist (NS) period, the genocide of the Jews in gas chambers located in the concentration camps happened.

The 3. Senate of the Bavarian state court rejected the motion concerning “the Holocaust is a fact, known to the court” with the pronouncement that it does not have any doubts as to the reality of the Holocaust, referring to the accessible and common information in words, pictures, and sound. (decision 1/14/2011, Bay AGH II – 27/09). The motion of the defense to challenge which material the senate based its certainty of “known to the court” was denied citing material in newspapers, on TV, in reference and history books (decision 2/8/2011).

The judiciary degrades itself to a grotesque caricature if it bases its judgments on the media and TV. Judiciary contains the word justice. It does not deserve its name.

No actual facts

It is worthy of notice that the so-called Holocaust is not legally defined and facts are avoided. In & 130 StGB-BRD which is used to convict “Holocaust deniers” the so-called Holocaust is not defined. It is not even mentioned.

The sentencing of Guenter Deckert in the first instance at the local court in Weinheim contains no determination of the crime of “Holocaust denial”. In other words there is no determination of the Holocaust in regard to the place of the crime, the methods of killing, the number of the dead, the time frame, the perpetrators, the bodies, no deposition taken of the witnesses, no proof of the intent by National Socialism to completely or partially exterminate the Jews. There is no determination about decisions, planes, orders or documents not even in the form of references to other judicial sentences.

In addition there is no determination of the knowledge the accused had, or is supposed to have had, or must have had, or could have had.

As long as the courts do not name the location on which the mass murder was suppose to have happened; as long as the courts do not describe how the killing was done; as long as the courts do not mention any proofs; a judgment that mass murder has occurred is not possible. The same is the case for “it is known to the court.”
Without submitting proof as to actual facts a sentencing for Holocaust denial is not valid.

Without the determination of what knowledge of the so-called Holocaust the accused had or could have had, the charge that he acted against his better knowledge is void.

If the above mentioned points are not addressed a sentencing for the denial of the Holocaust is arbitrary and a corruption of the law.

A defense is not possible

The refusal by the judiciary to bring up for discussion the principle of “it is known to the court that the holocaust happened” makes any defense impossible. Not knowing the concrete facts on which the accusation is based emasculates the defense. The law used to sentence an accused without the defense being able to challenge “it is known to the court” defeats the ends of the law.

“The Holocaust as fact is known to the court.” Which facts however the court knows are not stated.

For example: Dr. Martin Broszart, director for the federal Institute fuer Zeitgeschichte published the following: “Neither in Dachau, nor in Bergen-Belsen, nor in Buchenwald were Jews or other inmates gassed.” (Die Zeit, 8/19/1960, p 16). On the other hand there are publications which talk about the gassings in Dachau, Bergen-Belsen and Buchenwald. Which of the two is, according to the judiciary, “…known to the court?” Is it “known to the court” that inmates were gassed at Dachau, Bergen-Belsen and Buchenwald, or is it “… known to the court” that nobody was gassed at Dachau, Bergen-Belsen and Buchenwald? Both cannot be “… known to the court.”

An entire event such as the so-called “Holocaust” can only be undisputed (facts known to the court) when the individual events are undisputed (facts known to the court).

The history Professor Dr. Gerhard Jagschitz of the Institute for Contemporary History at the University of Vienna wrote the following expert opinion: “Substantial doubts about the trials in question have been raised by the presentation of expert opinions to national and international courts. The relentless repetition of judgments using “ facts known to the court,” namely that the Jews were killed by gas in the concentration camp of Auschwitz, will not be enough on which to base sentencing in a democratic nation which is supposed to be founded on justice and right.” (letter to the state court Vienna, 1/10/l991, AZ:26b Vr 14 184/86)

The Ruhr –Nachrichten (Bochum) No. 277 (11/29/2005) printed a citation by the Israeli writer and musician Gilad Atzmon: “The historiography known to us about WWII and the Holocaust is a complete falsification initiated by the Americans and Zionists.”

Is the Holocaust indisputably “a fact known to the court” or is it indisputably “a fact known to the court” that the Holocaust is frequently challenged and therefore can not be “a fact known to the court?”

It is therefore illogical to call a certain alleged historical event which is frequently contested as “a fact known to the court”, a concept which the authorities then use to persecute and penalize the “deniers.”

Abuse of procedural rights

After reading the motion Guenter Deckert wanted to know what he has to accept as “facts known to the court.” The prosecutor, Andreas Grossmann replied (11/14). “That you will find out during sentencing.” During the sentencing however nothing was said.

The chairman, Ross, decreed to postpone the decision concerning the motion. He said: first principles have to be established. Prosecutor Grossmann remarked (January 13, 2012) that the motion only will be dealt with after the pleading. The purpose became obvious when (January 13, 2012) the motion was denied. In the meantime Guenter Deckert took up his case again. In order to show that the “facts are known to the court” must be fully discussed he described in detail circumstances and facts which made him doubt the “Holocaust.” For example he mentioned Dr. Benedikt Kautzky who, for seven years, was in German concentration camps among others, in Auschwitz-Birkenau, and who wrote that in no camp did he ever see a gas chamber.

The chamber denied the motion to discuss “facts are known to the court“ (chairman – Roos, jurors-Wolfgang W. and Helmut M.) using, among other arguments, the reason, “the Holocaust defined as mass killings of Jews especially in the gas chambers of the concentration camps during WWII is “a fact known to the court” (January 13, 2012). The Holocaust as historical event is considering evidence beyond discussion.”

“The facts are known to the court” is not to be discussed because “the facts are known to the court” is a circular argument incompatible with logic and beyond reason and the principles of justice.

The resolution goes on to accuse Guenter Deckert of abusing procedural rights. The need for proofs is not applicable since Guenter Deckert’s demands in that regard, during the main trial, are only designed to involve the court in order to spread his revisionist ideas. This is obvious from his presentation in which he declared that “facts known to the court” needs to be discussed.

According to the court it is an abuse of the justice system when an accused, before being sentenced, tries to move the court to examine the facts of which he is accused.

The resolution furthermore implies that the chamber considers the discussion which forms the basis of the accusation as “court research” to which the accused is not entitled.

The court in this resolution has obviously ignored the laws of reason.

On one hand the court looks at the motion to discuss “the Holocaust, a fact known to the court” (contrary to what Guenter Deckert has said) as a move for proof, on the other hand, in contradiction to this, as a motion to obtain “court research”. The motion however implies neither one nor the other.

Historical facts are deliberately ignored

The resolution further states that Guenter Deckert deliberately ignores historical facts and obstinately refuses to accept the truth.

Reacting to the resolution (January 13, 2012) Guenter Deckert moved (February 2, 2012) that the chamber communicate the following:

According to the court’s knowledge “the ‘Holocaust’ is a fact” in which concentration camps and gas chambers existed.

According to the court’s knowledge in what ways did additional killings take place?

According to its knowledge what were the number of victims?

According to the court’s opinion which facts of the so-called Holocaust have I ignored and accepted?

Since the prosecutor and the court have not produced any facts in regard to the accusation I cannot know which facts I supposedly ignore.

I made the motion to discuss the principles of the “Holocaust is a fact known to the court” in order to be able to defend myself against the accusation of Holocaust denial. I stated in detail that the court is duty bound to discuss their determination that the “Holocaust is a fact known to the court.”

In addition I have pointed out that there is no concrete definition of the so-called Holocaust.

Furthermore no determination has been made about which knowledge of the so-called Holocaust I had or was supposed to have had or could have had.

In the resolution of January 13, 2012 the so-called decision does not contain any determination to the circumstances and “it is known to the court,” nor are there any references.

Without defining the deed in question a sentencing for Holocaust denial is not possible.

Without determining which concrete knowledge the accused had about the so called “Holocaust”, or could have had, an accusation to have acted against his better knowledge is void, and therefore a sentencing for denying the truth is not possible.

What is “fact known to the court”

During my argument I presented facts which show that there is a need for a discussion about “fact known to the court.”

“Known to the court” are historical facts which by means of historical research are considered proven and everybody therefore without specific knowledge can inform himself from history books, encyclopedia and similar reference books (Alsberg/Nuesse/Meyer, proof in a trial, 5. edition, Carl Heymanns publishing house, Berlin 1983, p.539.

The acceptance of “the fact is known to the court” rests on the preliminary condition that the fact is not challenged (vglAlsber/Nuesse/meyer, a.a.O., p. 568.

If however in historiography the truth of an event is contested it does not become accepted knowledge just because much has been written about it and disseminated (Alsberg/Nuesse/Meyer, a.a.O.,P. 540).

In my motion to discuss “the Holocaust happened is known to the court” I cited examples of publications, especially non revisionist publications which prove that the Holocaust historiography is not in agreement, does not speak with one voice, is not unchallenged, and contradicts itself. The Holocaust therefore cannot be claimed as “a fact known to the court.”

A sentencing for denying the Holocaust on the basis of “the Holocaust is known to the court” is therefore not possible. I made the motion not in order to spread revisionism, as maintained by the chamber, but for the simple reason that I have been accused of Holocaust denial and that I want to use my right to defend myself.

To dismiss my motion because I intended for the court to deal with “the Holocaust is known to the court” is arbitrary. Before sentencing it is an essential duty and the task of the court to deal with the underlying facts.

It is factually and judicially not understandable why in a trial for Holocaust denial a motion is supposed to be abusive which is meant to bring clarity in regard to “a fact known to the court.”

“Fact known to the court” is in need of discussion

When a French historian, Jacques Baynac, a proponent of the Holocaust writes that for the existence of the Nazi gas chambers only the lack of documents, traces and other material proofs can be confirmed (Le Noveau Quotidien de Lausanne, Switzerland , September 2, l996, p.16 and September 3/l996, p.14) then this means that there is a need to discuss “the Holocaust is known to the court.”

Michel de Bouaerd, professor for history and dean of the faculty for the Arts and Sciences at the University of Caen (Normandy) states that the documentation concerning the Holocaust is rotten, that the documentation about the system of the German concentration camps is permeated by a mass of invented stories, relentless repetitions of falsifications, especially in regard to numbers, and confusion and generalizations (Ouest-France v. 2-3 August l986, p. 6). This again proves that there is a need to discuss “the Holocaust is known to the court.”

Historian Professor Ernst Nolte seconds the need for a discussion of “fact known to the court. “The testimony of witnesses rests to a large part on hearsay and mere surmises; the testimony of the few eyewitness are in part contradictory and create doubts in regard to their veracity.”

The director of the Yad Vashem memorial, Shmuel Krakowski, in the same vain states (Jerusalem Post, August 17, l986): “Most of the 20,000 witnesses’ testimony concerning the Holocaust are unbelievable, falsified, cannot be verified, or in other ways are not true.”

On January 13, 2012 during a pause in the proceedings (around 16:30) the chairman Ross directed the following words to me: “You would be surprised at the knowledge of history by the jurors.” But judges have to make an unencumbered decision, based on their conviction which they formed during the proceedings in question (& 261 StPO). In addition “facts known to the court” in order to be useable have to be introduced during the main trial in order to give the participants the opportunity to take a position.

It would therefore be useful if the members of the chamber would reveal their knowledge of history to the accused before they convict him on the basis of this knowledge.

If not it will remain obscure on which facts the members of chamber base their views. It (the Holocaust) is supposed to be a wrong removed from common categories and therefore &130 StGB is an exception to the prohibition of having a special law. (motion of cessation of the trial on account of the special law & 130 which is contrary to the German basic law. The motion was denied January 13, 2012)

Permanent misjudgment

The chamber misrepresents my motion. It considers it a motion for proof which is obvious from their choice of words. “The chamber is supposed to furnish proof,” “makes proof unnecessary.” “proof is also inadmissible,” “a motion for proof is inadmissible (p.2 of the resolution).”

But it is unequivocally clear that the motion was not a motion for proof.

The motion to discuss the principle of “the Holocaust, a fact known to the court” does not mean, that the Holocaust did not happen (p. 2 of the resolution), but was a motion to examine the facts on which “fact known to the court” are based.

The chamber maintains that I contested “facts known to the court.” The chamber is mistaken. I did not contest facts, but demanded the discussion of facts.

What is a circular argument?

A circular argument is to deny the motion for discussion of the principle of “fact known to the court” with the argument that a discussion is not necessary since the Holocaust is “a fact known to the court.” (p.2 of the resolution.)

The chamber misunderstands not only the meaning of a “circular argument,” but also the concept of “an established fact known to the court.” What is frequently contested can’t be “an established fact known to the court” since “an established fact known to the court” is defined as undisputed, unchallenged (see above).

It is a circular argument if I would say “the holocaust is not “a fact known to the court” because “it is not known to the court.” It is, however, not a circular argument if I say: “the Holocaust is not fact known to the court” because “known to the court” is equivalent to conformity and indisputability. The historiography of the Holocaust is not in conformity and is not unchallenged. The resolution stated by the chamber shows a lack of capacity to reason.

It is inconsequential if it happened or not

My motion of January 13, 2012 in which I stated that the incriminating book is scientifically correct was denied. The following reason was given: It does not matter if the book is scientifically correct. I am guilty since I assisted in the formation of the book.

It looks as if the chamber agrees with the view of the Mannheim court who convicted Ernst Zuendel. “It does not matter if the Holocaust did or did not take place.” The “tageszeitung (February 9, 2007, p.6)” writes about the Zuendel trial: “At the end the court denied all the motions with the lapidary reason (a shock to some of the antifascists among the audience): “It does not matter one wit if the Holocaust did or did not take place. Its denial is punishable under German law. Only this is what counts.”

Palestine: Jewish Settlers Occupy Christian Monastery, Raise Israeli Flag

April 22, 2013 by admin Leave a Comment

Israeli Settlers Vandalize MonasteryLatrun Trappetist Monastery West Bank

http://nsnbc.me/2013/04/22/palestine-settlers-occupy-monastery-raise-israeli-flag/

Palestine: Settlers Occupy Monastery, Raise Israeli Flag
April 22, 2013

IMEMC, - On Friday, April 19, a group of extremist Israeli settlers occupied a Christian Monastery in a Palestinian village, near the central West Bank city of Ramallah, and raised an Israeli flag over it.

Speaking to the Maan News Agency, Father Aziz Ra’ey stated that the setters forced their way into the monastery and the chapel in the Palestinian village of Taybeh, near Ramallah, and raised an Israeli flag.

The latest attack is part of what became repeated incidents of assaults and acts of desecration carried out by extremist Israeli settlers against Islamic and Christian holy sites, and graveyards, in different parts of occupied Palestine.

On December 12 2012, a number of extremist Israeli settlers wrote, on Wednesday at dawn, racist graffiti attacking Christianity and Jesus Christ on the walls of a monastery in occupied Jerusalem.

The graffiti written on the walls of the monastery included “Price Tag”, (a reference to the idea that Palestinians must all ‘pay a price’ for the dismantling of illegal settlement outposts by the Israeli military), and several insults against Jesus Christ.

The settlers also punctured the tires of three vehicles parked near the monastery.

In September of 2012, extremist Israeli settlers burnt the main gate of the c west of Jerusalem, and wrote racist graffiti against Jesus Christ and against Christianity.

On Tuesday at dawn, June 19: A number of extremist Israeli settlers burnt a local mosque in Jaba’ Palestinian village, in occupied East Jerusalem, and defaced some of its walls.

Local sources reported that the settlers wrote racist graffiti on some of the walls of the mosque, including the “Price Tag” graffiti.

On February 20, 2012, settlers spray-painted racist graffiti on a church in occupied East Jerusalem in the third such incident since January 2012.

The graffiti also included “Death to Christians” and the phrase “price tag” was found on the walls of the Baptist Narkis Street Congregation. Furthermore, residents of the area found their car tires slashed.

Wednesday January 4th 2012, settlers set fire to two Palestinian trucks and spray-painted anti-Arab, racist graffiti.

In February, the bilingual school Hand In Hand and the Monastery of the Cross were vandalized, and graffiti promoting violence against Christians was found on its wall.

On December of 2011, the settlers carried out four attacks against mosques in several parts of the occupied West Bank, and set ablaze five Palestinian cars near the central West Bank city of Ramallah.

In an attack targeting several mosques, the settlers spray-painted slogans including ‘Price Tag’. They also burnt copies of the Quran.

In mid-December of 2010, a group of fanatic Israeli settlers burnt a mosque in Borqa village, east of the central West Bank city of Ramallah, and wrote racist graffiti on its walls.

The attack came only one day after a similar arson attempt targeted the historic mosque of Okasha in Jerusalem. Before setting parts of the mosque ablaze, the settlers spray-painted racist graffiti targeting the Palestinians and the Muslim prophet.

Via International Middle East Media Center IMEMC
———-
About the Author

Saed Bannoura – Saed Bannoura, born 1973 in Palestine, is a prolific Palestinian journalist, who is working for the International Middle East Media Center IMEMC. After having been shot multiple times by an Israeli death squad, Saed Bannoura is confined to using a wheelchair. Saed Bannoura is a tireless activist for Palestinians rights. His work and the work of his colleagues at the independent Palestinian news agency IMEMC are setting today´s standards in independent reporting and media ethics, to a degree that most major “purportedly independent” news agencies have problems following the standards set by IMEMC. Saed Bannoura´s articles are published in media worldwide, including on nsnbc ìnternational. IMEMC´s website is located at www.imemc.org

Filed Under: Christianity, Christians, International Middle East Media Center, Islam, Israel, Israeli Terrorism, Israeli War Crimes, Jesus Christ, Jewish Crime, Jewish Israeli Settlers, Jewish Racism, Jewish Supremacism, Jewish Terrorists, Jews, Latrun Christian Monastery, Muslims, Palestine, Political Zionism, Ramallah, Saed Bannoura

Paul Fromm on the Demise of Free Speech in Canada by Prof. Kevin MacDonald

April 18, 2013 by admin Leave a Comment

http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2013/04/paul-fromm-on-the-demise-of-free-speech-in-canada/
Paul Fromm on the Demise of Free Speech in Canada

By Kevin MacDonald
April 13, 2013

Paul Fromm, a pro-White activist who writes for his CAFE (Canadian Association for Free Expression) website, has an article on a recent ruling by the Canadian Supreme Court that once again indicates the power of the cultural left at the highest reaches of Western societies “The Whatcott Decision – A Grim Day for Christians and Freedom of Speech“). The case involves a $15000 fine (plus court costs likely to be north of $150,000) imposed on an evangelical Christian who distributed leaflets containing criticism of homosexuality based on Biblical teachings.

Some excerpts and comments:

The decision is pure cultural Marxism. It reflects the triumph of *Frankfurt School* social science which has captured most Western universities. While economic communism collapsed and was defeated, cultural communism was spread by the *Frankfurt School*. Basically, it sees the world divided up into two classes: oppressors – those would be White Christians, and especially sexually healthy White males – and the oppressed – those would be women, homosexuals, Jews, and certain other racial minorities. To overthrow the “oppressors” and to establish universal equality – not of opportunity but results – the *Frankfurt School* targeted loyalty to family, country and religion. There began a concerted campaign of “deconstruction” whereby political heroes, cultural heroes – the dismissal of traditional English literature as the writing of dead, White males – and traditional Christianity were mocked and attacked. These ideas have captured the upper echelons of Canada’s judiciary and bode poorly for freedom of speech.

The Whatcott decision holds that in human rights cases:

· Truth is no defence;?

· Intent is no defence;?

· No harm needs to be proven to have been caused to a “vulnerable” minority;

· A minority is designated as “vulnerable” not because of any evidence – the court admits concrete evidence is often lacking, but on the mere say-so of a human rights commission or court;

· Christians are not protected from hatred as they are not a “vulnerable minority.”

The Court depicts Mr. Whatcott as having the power to intimidate homosexuals. The reality is far different:

Well, where’s the evidence that in the decade since Mr. Whatcott handed out his flyers critical of homosexuals, that “dialogue” was shut down and homosexuals were unable to respond? For nearly 20 years, the powerful homosexual lobby has been pushing for same sex marriage – a revolutionary anti-family retreat from tradition. In 2001, Parliament overwhelmingly voted to endorse the traditional definition of marriage – one man and one woman. The lobby continued its pressure, apparently not intimidated or silenced by the lonely Mr. Whatcott’s leafleting. A cowardly Jean Chretien referred the “question” as to whether the traditional definition of marriage, accepted by almost all but the fringiest elements of Christianity, and by Judaism, Islam, and Hinduism, was “discriminatory” to the judicial revolutionaries on the Supreme Court. They collapsed and gave the homosexual lobby what it wanted. Canada has same-sex marriage.

Despite being a Catholic, Liberal Premier Dalton McGuinty of Ontario forced even Catholic schools to promote the homosexual agenda in the schools and have Gay-Straight Alliance Clubs, even though the practice of homosexuality violates Catholic teaching. (So much for religious freedom!) The homosexual agenda has triumphed in almost every battle. It successfully pressured to have “sexual orientation” added to the privileged groups protected by Sec. 319 of the Criminal Code, Canada’s notorious “hate law.” In fact, there’s no evidence that Mr. Whatcott’s pathetic little leafleting operation ever intimidated any homosexual from promoting his cause. The only one excluded from the debate is Mr. Whatcott! Mr. Whatcott and strong critics of the homosexual agenda are all but excluded from the mainstream media. Pro-homosexual commentators bray their views from the CBC and the Globe and Mail is virtually a mouthpiece for the homosexual lobby. The only voices marginalized are critics of the homosexual agenda.

Fromm targets the Frankfurt School, a Jewish intellectual movement discussed in Chapter 5 of The Culture of Critique:

Despite calling themselves a “School of Social research,” the Frankfurt School feared any objective research that might challenge their ideology. Like the Supreme Court, they defined the world ideologically, and facts would not be allowed to get in the way:

The Frankfurt School never set out to find out the truth about human behavior and institutions. Instead, its members viewed empirically oriented social science as an aspect of domination and oppression. Horkheimer wrote in 1937 that “if science as a whole follows the lead of empiricism and the intellect renounces its insistent and confident probing of the tangled brush of observations in order to unearth more about the world than even our well-meaning daily press, it will be participating passively in the maintenance of universal injustice.” Rather than find out how society works, the social scientist must be a critic of culture and adopt an attitude of resistance toward contemporary societies.

The unscientific nature of the enterprise can also be seen in its handling of dissent within the ranks of the Institute—a trend that is a common feature of Jewish intellectual and political movements Erich Fromm was excised from the movement in the 1930s because his leftist humanism opposed the authoritarian nature of the psychoanalyst-patient relationship. This was not compatible with the pro-Bolshevik stance championed at the time by the Horkheimer-Adorno line: Fromm “takes the easy way out with the concept of authority,without which, after all, neither Lenin’s avant-garde nor dictatorship can be conceived of. I would strongly advise him to read Lenin…I must tell you that I see a real threat in this article to the line which the journal takes. (See Chapter 5 of The Culture of Critique.)

One of the most shocking revolutionary conclusions of the Court is that truth should not be a defence, at least in human rights cases: “The lack of defences is not fatal to the constitutionality of the provision. Truthful statements can be presented in a manner that would meet the definition of hate speech, and not all truthful statements must be free from restriction. …

Fromm emphasizes the Jewish role in this decision:

Finally, and this is a delicate topic in oppressive, minority-ruled Canada, let’s look at the makeup of the six judge panel who heard this crucial case about the rights of Christians. Three, yes three, or fully one half of the panel were Jews. Under the regime of employment equity, a Canadian version of anti-White “affirmative action”, invented by, guess who? Madame Justice Rosalie Silberman Abella, who was on the panel, “systemic discrimination” is evidenced by an over-representation or under-representation of a group. It must be remembered that Jews, at about 310,000, constitute less than one per cent of Canada’s population, but made up half of panel in Whatcott! Did their personal views interfere? Ironically, had Justice Abella applied her own “employment equity” she’d have removed herself from the panel in Whatcott as her minority was already heftily over-represented.

The author of this freedom trashing opinion was Mr. Justice Marshall Rothstein of Manitoba. His biography on the Supreme Court website notes: “He served as an adjudicator under the Manitoba Human Rights Act from 1978 to 1983 and as a member of the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal from 1986 to 1992.” In other words, he was, for more than a decade, part of the whole repressive “human rights” industry he was now being invited to critique. In his case, there was more than a “reasonable apprehension of bias.” Perhaps, no surprise he found state censorship and strong criticism of privileged minorities perfectly justified in a “free” [do words mean nothing!] and “democratic society.”

At least two Liberal senators, Robina Jaffer and Jim Munson (a former journalist happily at ease with state censorship), in speaking against Bill C-304, which would repeal Sec. 13 (Internet censorship) of the Canadian Human Rights Act quoted Justice Abella and her emphasis on“vulnerable minorities”: to wit: “In a 2009 speech entitled Human Rights and History’s Judgment, Justice Rosalie Abella said: We were supposed to have learned three indelible lessons from the concentration camps of Europe. First, indifference is injustice’s incubator. Second, it’s not just what you stand for, it’s is what you stand up for. And third, we must never forget how the world looks to those who are vulnerable.’” Justice Abella was also part of the human rights industry having served on the Ontario Human Rights Commission. Her biography on the Supreme Court website notes: “She married Canadian historian Irving M. Abella on December 8, 1968.” Irving Abella is a past president of the Canadian Jewish Congress, a pro-censorship intervener in Whatcott. The CJC has been a long-time and strident supporter of anti-free speech “hate laws”. Again, one might wonder why Justice Abella did not recuse herself from this case is there is more than a “reasonable apprehension of bias.”

It is certainly true that the organized Jewish community has been a strong voice supporting laws curtailing free speech, not just in Canada, but throughout the Western world (see “The Hate Crimes Prevention Bill: Why Do Jewish Organizations Support It?“). Irving Abella’s book was cited in my chapter on the Jewish role in promoting immigration. Although the chapter emphasizes the Jewish role in altering U.S. immigration policy in favor of non-Whites, the Jewish community played a similar role throughout the West, including Canada:

In the case of Canada, Abella (A Coat of Many Colors: Two Centuries of Jewish Life in Canada; 1990, 234–235) notes the important contribution of Jews in bringing about a multicultural Canada and, in particular, in lobbying for more liberal immigration policies. Reflecting this attitude, Arthur Roebuck, attorney general of Ontario, was greeted “with thunderous applause” at a 1935 convention for the Zionist Organization of Canada [dedicated to a Jewish ethnostate] when he stated that he looked “forward to the time when our economic conditions will be less severe than they are today and when we may open wide the gates, throw down the restrictions and make of Canada a Mecca for all the oppressed peoples of the world” (in M. Brown 1987, 256).

Abella also co-authored a book, None Is Too Many that was critical of Canada for not admitting Jewish refugees in the World War II era. The title comes from a statement of a senior Canadian immigration official that summed up Canadian policy.

Thus we have Jewish activists involved in academic research on Jewish issues. And perhaps more importantly, Jewish activists are involved in court decisions that reflect consensus views within the Jewish community on issues related to free speech, multiculturalism, and immigration. The hostile elite in action.

—–

Filed Under: "hate speech", "Jewish" holocaust, Abrams/BBC v. Arthur Topham & RadicalPress.com, Anti-Defamation League (ADL), B'nai Brith Canada, BC HATE CRIME TEAM, Bill C-304, Bill Whatcott, C.B.C./Canadian Broadcasting Corp., CAFE - Canadian Association for Free Expression, Canada's Queer Community, Canadian Catholic News, Canadian Charter of Rights & Freedoms, Canadian Council for Israel and Jewish Advocacy (CIJA), Canadian Human Rights Act, Canadian Human Rights Commission, Canadian Human Rights Tribunal, Canadian Jewish Congress, Canadian Jewish Lobby, Canadian Judicial System, Catholic Activists, Catholic Insight magazine, Chabad Lubavich Cult, Conservative Party of Canada, Editor's Zone, Free Speech on the Internet, Freedom of Speech, Globe and Mail, Harry Abrams, Hate Crime laws, Hate laws, Jewish Censorship, Jewish Crime, Jewish Freemasons, Jewish Hatred, Jewish Holocaust Industry, Jewish Lobby Groups, Jewish Media Monopoly, Jewish Racism, Jews, Justice Marshall Rothstein SCC, Kevin MacDonald, League for Human Rights of B'nai Brith Canada, Madame Justice Rosalie Silberman Abella, Marxism, Marxist Frankfurt School, Paul Fromm (CAFE), PM Stephen Harper, Political Zionism, Roman Catholics, Sec. 13(1) CHRA, Sec. 319(2) CC "Willful Promotion of Hatred", The Controversy of Zion, The Holy Bible, The Occidental Observer, The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, Ukrainian Holocaust

The Tyee: Zionist Collaborator and Hate-monger promotes Fear and Smear campaign against Doug Christie

March 13, 2013 by admin Leave a Comment

[Editor's Note: I was alerted to this vicious smear of Doug Christie, penned by Tyee contributor Tom Hawthorn, by a good friend and associate only this morning.

In their email regarding the Tyee's hate-filled screed against Doug the writer said, "I am SO TICKED off at the slanderous article in the FUCKING TYEE I could spit right now. OH I am so FURIOUS at the Tyee for printing this crap! It is like the author waited for just the right time to loose his venom.... and his readers all agree. DEAR GOD ARTHUR! sick fucks... pardon me ..."

Sick fucks indeed! Yet does it come as a surprise to me? No, not at all.

I've been monitoring the Tyee since its inception and have been fully cognizant of its editorial position with respect to the machinations of the Jews and their deadly, nefarious ideology known as Zionism. They are but another of the "left", "liberal", "progressive", "yuppie", "pseudo-alternative", "mainstream", "anti-racist", "marxist" media outlets that wouldn't say "shit" about the actions of the Jews even if their mouth was full of it (which it is).

By their actions here in posting this vile, hate-filled diatribe against a man who has given his life to fighting against the very forces that these bigoted bastards now have shown themselves to be a part of, it is but another fine example of how Lady Justice always tends to out those who would deceive the general public, sooner or later. Now we know for sure the true intent and focus of "The Tyee" and who they owe their allegiance to.

As my friend pointed out in their email, even the comments (for the most part) by Tyee readers to the malicious and callous denigrating of the recently dead Mr. Christie tended to reflect the type of online community of Zionist sycophants that congregate around its malignant and odious effusions of hate and calumny. The Tyee, in granting this Zionist grunt their headline space to further the lies of the Jews with respect to the righteous and honorable actions of Douglas Christie, has shown its true colours and they just happen to be blue and white, the same as the flag of the state of Israel.

As previously stated I've always known there was something fishy smelling about this online blog and one can only hope that after three or more days of exposing this article to the sunshine of truth that the whole of the Tyee's reputation for being a disseminator of truth and freedom will stink to high heaven and online readers will approach it with a firm grasp of their nose and the caution it clearly deserves.]

—–

I refuse to adorn my site with this pathetic zio bullshit hit piece and would ask of readers to go to the url provided if they wish to get a good whiff of what truth seekers and lovers of freedom of speech are truly up against.

http://thetyee.ca/Life/2013/03/13/The-Unauthorized-Obituary-of-Doug-Christie/

Filed Under: B'nai Brith Canada, B'nai Brith International, BC HATE CRIME TEAM, BC Justice Minister Shirley Bond, Canadian Association for Freedom of Speech (CAFE), Canadian Charter of Rights & Freedoms, Canadian Council for Israel and Jewish Advocacy (CIJA), Canadian Free Speech League, Canadian Human Rights Act, Canadian Human Rights Commission, Canadian Human Rights Tribunal, Canadian Identity/Sovereignty, Canadian Jewish Congress, Canadian Jewish Lobby, Canadian Judicial System, Charter of Rights & Freedoms, Doug Christie, Douglas H. Christie, Ernst Zundel, Free Speech, Free Speech on the Internet, Freedom of Expression, Freedom of Speech, Freedom of Thought, Jewish Censorship, Jewish Hatred, Jewish Holocaust Lie, Jewish Lobby Groups, Jewish Media Monopoly, Jewish Porn Industry, Jewish Racism, Jewish Ritual Murder, Jewish Supremacism, Jewish Terrorists, Jews, Jews Behind Bolshevik Revolution, Jim Keegsra, Political Zionism, The Tyee, Zionism, Zionist Atrocities, Zionist National Post

Canada’s Israel Lobby by Peyton Vaughn Lyon

March 3, 2013 by admin Leave a Comment

Canada’s Israel Lobby

Peyton Vaughan Lyon

Professor Emeritus, Political Science, Carleton University

D. Phil., Oxford

This article is an update of a study of the Canada Israel Committee (CIC) published in the Journal of Canadian Studies, 1992-3. It benefited by extensive comments from Professors John Sigler, Joseph Debanné, David Farr and Diana Ralph, and Rt. Hon Robert Stanfield, Ian Watson, and Bahija Reghai. I have discussed the Israel Lobby with about 20 foreign affairs officials, 2 former Prime Ministers, 3 former Secretaries of State for External Affairs, 8 Members of Parliament, 6 Senators, and 3 officials of the Canada-Israel Committee.

March 2010

Dr. Lyon is Professor Emeritus Political Science, Carleton University. He was a Rhodes Scholar, and obtained his D.Phil. from Oxford University. He served in the RCAF from 1940 to 1945.

He held posts as Foreign Service Officer, Department of External Affairs in Ottawa, Canada and in Bonn, Germany. He is the author of five books on Canadian foreign policy, trade and defence.

Canada’s relations with the Arab/Muslim world are second in importance and difficulty only to its relationship with the United States. The one serious threat to Canadian citizens now stems from the mounting anger of Arabs and other Muslims, fomented largely by Israel’s long-standing occupation of Palestine. The Mid-East conflict has for sixty years been the principal issue on the agenda of the UN General Assembly, a body in which Canadians like to shine. Trade with the Middle East, while modest, is largely in manufactured goods, the sort favoured by Canadian exporters.

Canada’s foreign policy, however, fails to reflect these concerns. Its votes in the UN General Assembly and other international bodies are closer in support of Israel than those of any other nation apart from the United States and its five Pacific satellites. Prime Minister Harper’s personal statements are more biased towards Israel than those of any other leader(1) This imbalance does not accord with the advice of the men and women employed by Canada to determine and implement its interests in the Middle East. It is also opposed by an increasing number of churches, unions, and other bodies concerned with peace and justice in Palestine.

Who makes Canada’s Mid-East policy? A ranking of influence by a panel of foreign affairs officials placed the Canadian Jewish Community first at

compared to 5.40 for each of the Prime Minister and the Department of External Affairs. The Canadian/Arab Community at 1.80 was ranked sixteenth out of the eighteen estimated influence inputs. (2) Although the Arab Community has become better organized in recent years, interviews with senior officials and case studies suggest that there has been little change in this ranking.

There is of course nothing illegal or immoral about lobbies, even those operating in the interest of foreign entities. A significant number of ethnic groups do in fact lobby for their countries of origin. (3) Canada’s Israel lobby is simply by far the most powerful and effective. It has become customary to refer to it as “the Lobby”, and I shall follow that practice. The Lobby claims to act on all Canada-Israel matters on behalf of an estimated two- thirds of the three hundred and fifteen thousand Canadians of Jewish origin.(4)

For obvious reasons, the American-Israel lobby is far larger, more powerful, and better known than its Canadian counterpart. (5) There are further significant differences and I shall begin with them. American Jews number about three percent of the population whereas the Canadian equivalent is a more modest one percent. American Jews, having arrived earlier in North America, are more integrated into the general population and less united in support of their government’s Mid-East policy. Canadian Jews, in the words of Professors Taras and Weinfeld, “are more Jewish.” Other authorities have said they are more conservative. (6) “Is there,” asked Gerald Caplan, another prominent Jew, “any act of Israel that will shame the leaders of Canadian Jewry into saying enough is enough?” (7)

The biggest difference in the tactics followed by the two lobbies lies in their degrees of openness and use of threats. Because the role of Congress in making foreign policy is much greater than that of Parliament, and party discipline is weaker, the American lobby focuses on individual members of Congress, none of whom can take refuge behind a party line. Because cabinet solidarity matters more in Ottawa, the Canadian Lobby makes a greater effort to focus on every minister. Lobbying, moreover, is more acceptable in the American political culture and can be more open and hard hitting. A reputation for wealth, ruthlessness and success is in fact an asset whereas in Canada lobbies operate more discreetly and soft- pedal their influence. American elections are more frequent than in Canada; this makes raising funds more difficult, thus increasing the vulnerability of candidates to lobby pressure. Lobbying in the United States, however, is subject to greater legal restriction than in Canada. One authority goes so far as to say that, because of tighter organization, it is more effective in Canada. (6)

All in all, lobbying in each country is probably about equal in effectiveness. Elections afford each Lobby the greatest opportunity to exercise influence. Although most Jewish Americans have voted Democratic, and Canadian Jews Liberal, neither are formally aligned and votes can be swung if a party adopts what might appear to many Jews to be an anti-Israel approach. Jimmy Carter, in making an exceptional effort to bring peace to the Middle East, angered Israel and its American Lobby. As a result, Carter lost almost half his Jewish vote between 1976 and 1980, a loss which contributed to his defeat in the 1980 election. Sydney Spivak, chairman of the Canadian Lobby’s 1998 policy conference, threatened a similar outcome when Joe Clark, then Secretary of State for External Affairs, criticized Israel’s suppression of Palestinian rights.

A particular triumph for the American lobby was the defeat in 1984 of Charles Percy, chairman of the powerful Senate Foreign Relations Committee. As Tom Dine, executive director of AIPAC (the American Israel Public Affairs committee) — the predominant US-Israel lobby — boasted to a Toronto audience, “All the Jews in America … gathered to defeat Percy. And the American politicians got the message.” (8)

A comparable Canadian case was that of Dr. Frank Epp, an outstanding scholar and President of Waterloo University. In 1979, Epp ran as a Liberal in what was considered the safe Liberal seat in Waterloo. However, his desire for a more balanced approach to the Israel-Palestine conflict was falsely depicted by the Lobby as “anti-Semitic” – a charge the Lobby frequently uses to discredit critics of Israeli government policies. In Epp’s case, the attack culminated in a full-page advertisement on election eve. In a constituency containing several thousand Jews, Epp was defeated by a mere 155 votes.

In the Toronto riding of Saint-Paul’s, with about 20,000 Jewish voters, the 1979 election featured a Conservative promise to move the Canadian embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem. The Conservative candidate, Ron Atkey, won. In the election the following year –after Prime Minister Clark had abandoned his promise to move the embassy– the seat swung back to John Roberts of the Liberals.

In 1984 a Manitoba court ruled that unfair lobbying could have caused the defeat of Conservative candidate Luba Fedorkiw in Winnipeg North. Fedorkiw accused the Jewish advocacy group, B’nai Brith, of having defeated her by suggesting she was anti-Semitic and levelling the false charge of “Jew-baiting” against her. She was awarded $400,000 in damages.

The Lobby concentrates on the ten constituencies where most of the Jewish and Arab/Muslim populations are located. Proportionally more Jews, however, go to the polls and are more likely to make a difference. It should also be noted that a substantial minority of the Arabs are Maronite Christians who are indifferent to the fate of the majority of Arabs.

Patmos, The Emperor Worship Cultus, and The American Sniper by Pastor Mark Dankof

March 2, 2013 by admin Leave a Comment

Mark Dankof’s America

Patmos, The Emperor Worship Cultus, and The American Sniper

March 1, 2013

Pastor Mark Dankof

“I, John, your brother and companion in the suffering, and kingdom, and patient endurance that are ours in Jesus, was on the island of Patmos because of the word of God and the testimony of Jesus.”

Revelation 1:9

“I [Jesus] know your afflictions and your poverty–yet you are rich! I know the slander of those who say they are Jews and are not [ref. Romans 2: 28-29], but are a synagogue of Satan. Do not be afraid of what you are about to suffer. I tell you, the devil will put some of you in prison to test you, and you will suffer persecution for ten days. Be faithful, even to the point of death, and I will give you the crown of life.”

Revelation 2:9-10 [To the Church at Smyrna]

“I [Jesus] know that you have little strength, yet you have kept my word and have not denied my name. I will make those who are of the synagogue of Satan, who claim to be Jews though they are not [ref. Romans 2: 28-29; cf. John 8: 31-58], but are all liars–I will make them come and fall down at your feet and acknowledge that I have loved you.”

Revelation 3: 8-9 [To the Church at Philadelphia]

“The whole world was astonished and followed the Beast. Men worshiped the Dragon because he had given authority to the Beast, and they also worshiped the Beast and asked, ‘Who is like the Beast? Who can make war with him?’ . . . Then I saw another beast, coming out of the earth. He had two horns like a lamb but he spoke like a dragon. He exercised all the authority of the First Beast on his behalf, and made the earth and its inhabitants worship the First Beast . . . And he performed great and miraculous signs, even causing fire to come down from heaven to earth in full view of men. Because of the signs he was given power to do on behalf of the First Beast, he deceived the inhabitants of the earth. . . . He also forced everyone, small and great, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on his right hand or on his forehead, so that no one could buy or sell unless he had the mark, which is the name of the beast or the number of his name. . . . His number is 666.”

Revelation 13: 3-4; 11-14; 16-18

“For then there will be great distress, unequaled from the beginning of the world until now–and never to be equaled again. If those days had not been cut short, no one would survive, but for the sake of the elect those days will be shortened. At that time if anyone says to you, ‘Look, here is the Christ!’ or, ‘There he is!’ do not believe it. For false Christs and false prophets will appear and perform great signs and miracles to deceive even the elect–if that were possible. See, I have told you ahead of time.”

Matthew 24: 21-25 [Jesus in the Olivet Discourse]

“When Pilate saw that he was getting nowhere, but that instead an uproar [Jewish revolt against Roman administration in Palestine] was starting, he took water and washed his hands in front of the crowd. ‘I am innocent of this man’s blood,’ he said, ‘It is your [Jewish mob's] responsibility!’ All the people [Jewish mob] answered, ‘Let his blood be upon us and on our children!’ Then Pilate released Barabbas [Zionist Jewish political revolutionary and capital crimes convict] to them. But he had Jesus flogged, and handed him over to be crucified.”

Matthew 27: 24-26

The Empire’s next phase in deception and destruction both foreign and domestic unfolds next week in Washington with the latest American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) conclave. Joe “I am a Zionist” Biden will pinch hit for El Presidente as the main podium attraction for the Synagogue of Satan’s pep rally for an American-Israeli pogram of mass murder directed at the Islamic Republic of Iran (IRI). Biden’s presence at this sinister event is superseded in ominous overtone only by the presence of Mr. Obama in the Zionist State itself during the Vice President’s appearance at The Tribe’s lovefest in the Capitol, an event The Times of Israel emphasizes will concentrate on the achievement of two objectives with the American Congress. Objective One is to extract from Congress the enactment of legislation that will designate Israel a “strategic ally” of the United States, a status enjoyed by no other country. Objective Two is to “. . . facilitate a U. S. green light should Israel decide to strike Iran.”

This agenda is right on with John Hagee of Cornerstone Church in San Antonio and Christians United for Israel. Hagee’s $150 million dollar empire is entirely devoted to the Empire, and the Empire’s strategic alliance with the Zionist State, Talmudic racial supremacy, and a Jewish driven International Banking System fueling the advent of the global New World Order. One may be forgiven for seeing Hagee as a version of the second beast with two horns in the Apocalypse, providing religious legitimacy to the Dragon and The First Beast with his satellite television audience of 100 million awesomely mesmerized. ‘Who is like the Beast? Who can make war with him?’ seems to be making its way to the forefront of Evangelical and Pentecostal Television in a nightly paroxysm of moral and political obscenity differing from the ancient offerings of Al Goldstein’s Midnight Blue only in Mr. Hagee’s insistence on thankfully covering his rotund temple with tailored clothes, and in his avoidance of the ‘F’ word. Paradoxically, in terms of absolute and ultimate evil, he may have trumped Goldstein in spades.

Perhaps the most absurd of Hagee’s intellectual deficiencies and theological assertions contradicted by history is his insistence on the application of an absolutely toxic brand of exegetical quackery when it comes to half of Genesis 12: 3, which states that ” I [God] will bless those who bless you, and whoever curses you I will curse.” Ignoring the 7 fold structure of God’s promise in Genesis 12: 2-3; the Old Testament’s account of the specific reasons for the judgment of the Northern Kingdom of Israel in 722 B. C. at the hands of the Assyrians; the Old Testament’s account of the specific reasons for the judgment of the Southern Kingdom of Judah at the hands of the Babylonians in 586 B. C.; the entirety of the New Testament teaching on the nature of the Kingdom of God in Christ; the specific condemnations of National Israel for its rejection of Jesus Christ chronicled in the New Testament (Matthew 21-24 as merely one example); the New Testament’s use of the 7th aspect of God’s promise in Genesis 12: 3 (Acts 3: 25; Galatians 3:8); and most importantly, the eschatological evidence in the New Testament that the evil World System and its Beast have their roots in False Israel and “signs and wonders” of demonic source and origin, the Christian Zionist juggernaut led by Hagee seems determined to provide redemptive history with the ultimate fulfillment of 2 Corinthians 11: 13-14. There, in Paul’s conflict with the Judaizing infiltrators of the Church of Corinth in the first century, the Apostle observes that, “Such men [Judaizers] are false apostles, deceitful, workmen, masquerading as apostles of Christ. And no wonder, for Satan himself masquerades as an angel of light.” The Ugly Truth’s re-post today on “Israel Wields Bible’s Soft Power as Far as Brazil,” seems grimly suggestive of what is developing. Global deception is well underway, courtesy of The Hidden Hand.

If Hagee believes the United States has been especially blessed of God since the establishment of the modern Zionist State in 1948, he must be looking at a different America than that observed by an increasing number of his countrymen and countrywomen. Economically, the United States has seen the evaporation of its once awesome manufacturing capability; the accumulation of a national debt approaching $17 trillion dollars; the eclipse of what was the strongest middle class of any country on the planet; and a binge of Fiat Money creation by the Federal Reserve matched only by the intoxicating resort to perpetual borrowing from foreign Central Banks and the postponement of the day of reckoning.

Militarily, the tie-one-for-the Gipper outcome in the Korean War and the military disaster of Vietnam, have now paled in comparison to the eroding cancer of America’s Israeli-driven War on Terror in the Middle East and Central Asia. The final tally for the invasions and losing wars of counterinsurgency in Iraq and Afghanistan in lost lives and casualties remains to be tabulated, as do the final economic numbers for these miserable ventures. Steiglitz of the World Bank speaks of a $3-5 trillion dollar expenditure on these quixotic efforts, even apart from new ventures in Syria and the threatened war with Iran. Add the eventual tally for the Empire’s military competition with China in Africa for raw materials and minerals, and the larger picture emerges. Paul Craig Roberts wryly observes that dying Empires run out of both men and money before the life support plug is pulled.

Politically, the United States continues to be downgraded in the eyes of the global community, even as its adoption of Israeli police state philosophy and methodologies connect the War on Terror to a War on the American Constitution.

And culturally, a Zionist-run America has produced the full blown acceptance of abortion-on-demand, homosexuality and every other form of sexual perversion, and the replacement of a lawful society with one soaked in lawless and violence. The questions I thought Ron Paul should have asked Ralph Reed and the denizens of the Faith and Freedom Coalition Conference during the 2012 Republican Presidential Primary sweepstakes, may be asked of John Hagee and the advocates of an American Empire wedded to Israel at this very moment. How would he and they respond to the following presentation and analysis?:

“The truth of the present crisis is that every advocate of American Empire and its marriage to the Zionist Beast, is an avowed advocate of supporting–and being financed–by the very people who have given us every one of the maladies we decry: a fiat American currency, a direct Federal income tax, usurious interest rates, endless foreign wars, a morally polluted American culture, an economic globalism which has destroyed the once-vaunted American manufacturing economy, and the imposition of a domestic technological surveillance structure that threatens to replace the freedoms of our beloved Old Republic with a repristinated Stalinism.

“To all Ladies and Gentlemen of genuine Christian faith and commitment and all American patriots of any religious persuasion, I simply ask a few simple questions of you, and of the American people who are listening. First, why is the domestic and foreign policy of the modern American conservative movement and the Republican party being defined by a view of Biblical prophecy unheard of until the 19th century, and largely promoted worldwide by the House of Rothschild’s distribution of the Scofield Reference Bible through its Oxford University Press? Secondly, why are we in an alliance with a nation that has repeatedly committed crimes against the United States, including the Lavon Affair, Mossad involvement in the Kennedy assassination, the premeditated attack on the USS Liberty in June of 1967, the Pollard spy case, participation with Communist China in the theft of American nuclear secrets at Los Alamos through the PROMIS affair, and the more recent Ben Ami Kadish and AIPAC/Rosen/Weissman spy cases?

“Why are we in an alliance as American conservatives with a domestic Jewish lobby which has militantly supported and financed the radical feminist, abortion, and homosexual lobbies most of us are sworn to oppose?

“Why are we, as a pro-life movement, committed to policies of genocide against the Palestinians and the advocacy of the mass murder of Iranians, at the behest of an ‘ally’ which is the chief nuclear, biological, and chemical military power in the Middle East, and a non-signatory to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) signed, however, by Iran?

“And why, pray tell, are people presently in Washington, talking about recovering American Constitutional Principles, in the context of ongoing obeisance to the chief players in a central banking cabal which has handed to us the direct Federal income tax, the Federal Reserve Board, $17 trillion in national debt, and every globalist trade treaty that has destroyed both American sovereignty and our economic vitality?

“And why are American Christians and patriotic Americans across-the-board not concerned that Israeli intelligence is promoting agitation-propaganda through the Rupert Murdoch News Corp chain designed to begin a Third World War? Why are these people silent about the Israeli infiltration of our intelligence agencies, our Homeland Security Department, our Transportation Safety Administration (TSA), and our telecommunications industry? Who is the real perpetrator of what happened on September 11th, 2001, and why?

Additional recent news stories simply and finally underscore the Beastly character of what Matthias Chang terms the Zionist-Banking-U. S. Military Industrial Complex.

John on Patmos: Exiled Because of Resistance to the Emperor Worship Cultus. What Did He Learn of the Beast?

Several of these recent stories will suffice to illustrate the Beast’s stranglehold on the Empire. The first is Keith Johnson’s February 11th, 2013 essay for the American Free Press entitled, “Wall Street Vultures Drive Up Food Prices Even as Billions Across the Globe Starve.” Johnson chronicles how the poster boy of Jewish Global Finance and Power, Goldman Sachs, made $400 million dollars in profits last year by betting on the prices of food staples like wheat, corn, and soy. The pouring of billions of dollars into the commodity derivatives markets, and the financialization of the commodities market with products like the Goldman Sachs Commodity Index (GSCI), has enabled food speculators like Goldman Sachs to control 61% of the market for basic foods, up from 12% in 1996. This in turn has facilitated the doubling of global prices for food since 2003, with an estimated 868 million undernourished people the victims. Trace who and what Goldman Sachs is funding politically in the United States and globally. Can you say, “He [the Beast] also forced everyone, small and great, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on his right hand or on his forehead, so that no one could buy or sell unless he had the mark, which is the name of the beast or the number of his name. . . . His number is 666. . . .?”

The second story relates to the American military, the accompanying Warrior Cultus, and the untold story of what serving the Empire does to the Warriors. Victor Thorn unfolds this metastasizing evil for the same edition of the American Free Press. Citing the work of journalists Kelly Patricia O’Meara for the Citizens Commission on Human Rights and Clay Dillow for Popular Science, Thorn takes the uninitiated into the bizarre world of the utilization of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Transcranial Ultrasonic Mind Control for American military personnel. Google these terms with the names of the journalists in question. We may well ask, “What is the Empire’s real position on the value of innocent human life?” Its position on the innocent lives in Palestine, the Middle East, and Central Asia has already been established. But what is it doing to its own flesh and blood? And what mythology sells its soul-devouring agenda to the comatose subjects of Caesar?

Thorn proceeds to the most ugly fact haunting the Warrior Cultus. In 2012, the number of American soldiers who committed suicide surpassed those killed on battlefields. He cites Kelly O’Meara’s research, which tells us that from 2001-2009 the United States Army suicide rate increased more than 150%, even as military orders for psychiatric drugs for troops rose 76% over the same period. Put differently, what happens when, as Michel Lonsdale asks Robert De Niro in the movie Ronin, True Belief for the Warrior has died? Who does the Warrior subsequently decide that he is? What life is left when Belief in an Empire Served has Died?

In terms of the last 12 years, these lies of the American Empire woven as mythology began with the lie of what really happened on September 11th, 2001 and who was behind the attack. That was compounded with the lies regarding why the Empire was invading Afghanistan and Iraq.

Tillman Had Honor, Courage, and Integrity: The Empire Doesn’t

Pat Tillman as Poster Boy: War and Football Merge for the Empire

That then led to the pack of lies surrounding the tragic death in Afghanistan of NFL star Pat Tillman. Read the complete Wikipedia account to refresh historical memory. The official story was that Tillman was killed by “enemy fire.” After an extensive official cover-up of the truth, the United States Government finally acknowledged that the official story, used ongoingly in television ads and football stadium halftime ceremonies around the country to drive the American public to greater ongoing support for the War on Terror, was a lie. The new version said that he was killed by “friendly fire.” Or not so friendly fire. . . . read the Wikipedia account thoroughly for the troubling circumstantial evidence, never properly investigated, that Tillman came to oppose American military involvement in Afghanistan, and was subsequently murdered by some of his own uniformed colleagues for that opposition. The point is simply this: the Government that lied about 9-11, lied about the reasons for the invasions and occupations of two foreign countries, and lied about Pat Tillman, is the same Government being used by the Zionist Beast that controls it to justify illegal interventions in Libya and Syria among others, as a prelude to a mass murder in Iran being sold by Netanyahu and his American apologists as “self defense.”

“Enemy Fire,” “Friendly Fire,” “Al-Qaeda,” “Weapons of Mass Destruction in Iraq,” “Bin Laden,” “Democracy,” “Freedom,” and “Self Defense” . . . Has George Orwell risen from the dead to write American, Israeli, and NATO press releases? And what Beast is being served by the American, Israeli, and NATO press secretaries? Put differently, how do people like John McCain keep effectively spinning these Red, White, and Blue whoppers for a new set of coming victims and their families? Even as McCain’s father, Admiral McCain, wove myths to protect Israel after the USS Liberty attack in 1967? Whose script are these mannequins reading from?

Israel Asset and Warmonger John McCain Spins Mythology on the Pat Tillman Death

This then leads to the recent tragic death of Chris Kyle, the American Sniper. Kyle holds the all-time record for kills for an American military sniper. He also holds a distance record for a kill notched at some 2,100 yards removed from the targeted victim. Unlike what is now known about Pat Tillman, Kyle remained a Warrior For Whom Belief in Empire Lived, until his tragic and ironic death at the hands of an American Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) victim and Marine Corps denizen, who shot Kyle to death on a Texas gun range. The American Sniper’s undeniable prowess with a high-powered rifle and scope is unquestioned and formidable. His ability to think theologically, morally, and philosophically about what it was he was actually serving is the issue in question, not simply for him, but for the thousands who flocked to Texas Stadium for his funeral adorned in American Flags and carrying placards of support for every long since discredited canard used to support the War on Terror and the War on Civilizations. Michel Lonsdale might ask these well meaning folks also, “Where do You go, and what do You do when Belief has died? Who are You, really?”

The Christian Cross was strongly in evidence in Texas Stadium, albeit as a supplemental secondary symbol for the more prominently evidenced Old Glory. But did the faithful really believe their fallen hero was a defender of a culture informed by the morality of the New Testament and the Lord Jesus Christ? How sustainable is that in the wake of the Roe v Wade decision, the societal and legal imprimatur now placed on homosexuality and the legitimacy of sexual perversion of every brand, and the Economic Darwinism that divides a predatory Elite from the vulnerable? How sustainable is that given the foundational falsehoods undergirding the War on Terror and unswerving American support for a Zionist ideology that empowered the first century mob that called for the release of Barabbas and the death of Christ, even as it now seeks the eradication of Palestinians and Iranians in the name of an Eretz Yisrael in continued disobedience to the Lion of the Tribe of Judah and mere human decency itself?

The February 28th New York Times, the American Jewish Power Elite’s print daily of record, informs us in Matt Haber’s piece for the Thursday Styles section, “A Hush-Hush Topic No More,” that the latest trend in the Empire’s evolving mores in matters sexual involves the move toward the eventual mainstreaming of “sex play involving bondage and domination.” The reader is treated to the inside scoop on the Big Apple’s Paddles nightclub on West 26th Street; a report on the “blockbuster success” of E. L. James’s “Fifty Shades of Grey” trilogy (65 million copies sold worldwide according to Publishers Weekly); and the February premiere of the movie “Kink” at the Sundance Film Festival, a documentary directed by Christina Voros and produced by James Franco, tabbed by The Hollywood Reporter as a “friendly film” to the world of “bondage/discipline, domination/submission, and sadism/masochism.”

This is the wave of the Empire’s present and future. It is Emperor Domitian’s Rome all over again. Does the Christian or denizen of the Old American Empire die and kill for it, as the members of the Cult of the American Sniper apparently believe? This remains the compelling question of the day, and during the increasing onset of nightfall.

The American Sniper Funeral at Texas Stadium: Flag, Football, Cross, Cowboys, Coliseum, and 7000 True Believers

The American Sniper at Rest on the 50 yard line at Texas Stadium

A Bereaved American Witnesses the Chris Kyle Funeral Motorcade

The argumentation for a suspense of Belief in Empire and its War on Terror has already been made. The pictures of the Kyle funeral introduced into evidence simply chronicle the record of that day for those who cling unknowingly to the Beast as the Lamb. The symbolism of the funeral and its venue, suggest that someone was indeed disguised that day as an Angel of Light (2 Corinthians 11: 13-14). The light was extinguished, enshrouded in an impenetrable darkness.

The American Sniper Receives the “Grateful Nation” award from the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs (JINSA). Jewish Air Force Chief of Staff Norman Schwartz presenting. But what “Grateful Nation” is referenced at this event?

Which leads us to the last question of this particular day headed toward an impending night soon to overtake it. What will be the fate of those who openly question the American Empire, its marriage to the Zionist Beast, and the unmistakable Emperor Worship Cultus that accompanies it?

Chapter 1, verse 9 of the Apostle John’s Apocalypse is here most instructive and concurrently proleptic in suggesting the probable answer. John begins his own story and that of all of history by telling us under the influence of the Spirit of God that he is writing from an island called Patmos.

Not a Bad View for an Exile on Patmos: An Aegean Sunset.

Patmos is a small, rocky island of 50 square miles in that part of the Aegean known as the Icarian Sea. The barren nature of the island made it a logical choice for the Roman government and Emperor Domitian (81-96 A. D.) as a place of banishment for criminals. In physical appearance, the island was a striking first century paradox, with the island’s desolate countenance in absolute contradiction to the magnificent scenery posited by the white crags of the shoreline and the beauty of the open ocean beyond.

The Apostle was exiled there by Emperor Domitian for a simple reason. John was in staunch resistance to the demands of the Emperor that the Cult of Emperor Worship be enforced and its practices observed by its subjects. Christians who recognized that Christ was Lord, not Caesar, were facing increasing hostility and the targeting of the central Roman government.

John does not acquiesce to the demands of the first century Beast in any way. From Patmos, at the approximate age of 100 and after the death of all of his earliest and closest colleagues, he writes his Apocalypse to encourage the faithful to engage in the identical resistance to the machinations and deceptions of Beast and Empire. Their Souls in Eternity depend on this resistance and this faithfulness. The resistance requires suffering and faithful endurance (1:9). For those who persevere, the endgame is the Crown of Life. There can be no synthesis of the agendas of the Christ and the Beast. The lines of demarcation must be understood in the Spirit’s provided discernment, and observed faithfully even to the point of death (2:10). For those who understand the meaning of Eternity and the Crown of Life, they are assured that they will avoid the “Second Death” (2:11). Those who follow the Beast will be the only ones to experience the Second Death and the Lake of Fire.

John’s Apocalypse alternates between the first century Beast and the prophecies pertaining to the Beast of the twenty first. Both Beasts are wedded to the Synagogue of Satan (2:9/3:9). Both Beasts deceive with both the wielding of the secular sword and the performance of false signs and wonders (chapter 13). Both Beasts demand deification and the trappings of deity. Both Beasts desire the death and destruction of all who fail to take their mark and swear ultimate allegiance to them. Take heed, those who confuse the Kingdom of God in Christ with the Emperor Worship Cultus, the Synagogue of Satan, and the Warrior Cultus attached to them. The clock is running out.

As for those who pretend to be serving Jesus and the American Republic while working for The Tribe, we know who you are, Alex Jones and Michael Savage, among the many. We understand how well The Tribe pays, how easy life at present is, compared to a trip to exile on a modern day Patmos somewhere with its mandate of “suffering and patient endurance” (1:9).

But that life of ease is as illusory as the power of the Beast. His end shall come. So shall yours. And Act II for you and your followers, and the followers of John Hagee and The American Sniper, is an Act Without End. It gets rather hot in the Lake of Fire. But you will get every primetime interview with Benjamin Netanyahu, John Hagee, John McCain, Mitt Romney, General Stanley McChrystal, General Norman Schwartz, Donald Rumsfeld, Dick Cheney, and Joseph Lieberman that your heart desires. The studio bookings are great. But no studio ice water allowed.

——-

Filed Under: 'state' of Israel, 911, Abe Foxman, American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), Anti-Christ, Anti-Defamation League (ADL), Ashkenazi Jews, B'nai Brith Canada, Babylonian Talmud, Editor's Zone, Goldman Sachs Commodity Index (GSCI), Jesus Christ, Jewish Holocaust Industry, Jewish Holocaust Lie, Jewish Lobby Groups, Jewish Media Monopoly, Jewish Racism, Jewish Supremacism, Jews, John Hagee, John of Patmos, Pastor Mark Dankof, Political Zionism, Revelation, The Babylonian Talmud, The Beast, The Bible, The Times of Israel, Zionism

Radical Press Interview with Mark Glenn on The Ugly Truth BlogRadio Show

February 22, 2013 by admin Leave a Comment

Here is the Url to the show: http://blogtalk.vo.llnwd.net/o23/show/4/445/show_4445021.mp3

Dear Supporters of Freedom of Speech everywhere,

On Thursday, February 21st, 2012 I was privileged to be able to go on Mark Glenn’s BlogRadio show hosted by his site The Ugly Truth.

Mark is an excellent host and speaker and is extremely well versed in the Zionist issues of today and yesterday. As such his preliminary commentary on a number of issues that precedes my actual interview is well worth listening to.

The show lasted for an hour and forty-eight minutes so it will take some time to listen to but I highly recommend that you do.

The one thing that struck me most deeply as I listened to Mark speaking was the fact that in the United States the founding fathers had the forethought to insure that the people of that nation would take their freedoms seriously and therefore guaranteed that the foremost freedom, that of freedom of speech, would be enshrined in their Constitution. Were it so in Canada.

Here we are facing the pernicious machinations of the foreign state of Israel and its B’nai Brith lobbyists, compounded by the fact that these same inimical enemies of freedom also control our country’s media and have gained an extremely critical foothold both within the office of the Prime Minster of Canada Mr. Stephen Harper and within our judiciary. Their dangerous influence upon our government and our democratic institutions, exemplified by the self-created “hate crime” laws which they surreptitiously slipped into our legal system over time, stands as the most clear example of seditious actions aimed at undermining and subverting our government.

Hiding behind their mask of “mainstream” media propaganda they are in full attack mode and out to repress and control Canadian’s right to free expression and freedom of speech on the internet. Without our ability to talk freely about Israel and its sayanim, Fifth column organizations like B’nai Brith and its ideology of Zionism and to offer our perspectives and our criticisms on this most dangerous and diabolic political device ever known to humankind we are severely handicapped in our efforts to educate people as to its true design and motives and thus initiate measures to protect our own Constitutional rights and freedoms.

Thus the need for further and greater education on these matters. Please take the time to listen to this broadcast and remember that feedback to me is always welcome and necessary. I can be reached at radical@radicalpress.com .

Here is the Url to the show: http://blogtalk.vo.llnwd.net/o23/show/4/445/show_4445021.mp3

Filed Under: "hate speech", Abrams/B'nai Brith Canada v. Arthur Topham and RadicalP, America, Anti-Defamation League (ADL), Anti-terrorism Act, Arthur Topham, B'nai Brith Canada, BC HATE CRIME TEAM, Canadian Charter of Rights & Freedoms, Canadian Human Rights Act, Canadian Human Rights Commission, Canadian Human Rights Tribunal, Canadian Identity/Sovereignty, Canadian Judicial System, Conservative Party of Canada, Cst Normandie Levas BC HATE CRIME TEAM, Det-Cst Terry Wilson BC HATE CRIME TEAM, Editor's Zone, Free Speech on the Internet, Freedom of Speech, Gaza, Germany Must Perish!, Harry Abrams, Hasbara, Hate Crime laws, Hate laws, Israeli Terrorism, Israeli War Crimes, Jewish Censorship, Jewish Hatred, Jewish Lobby, Jewish Media Monopoly, Jewish power, Jewish Racism, Jewish Supremacism, Jews, League for Human Rights of B'nai Brith Canada, Mainstream Mindcontrol Media (M3), Mainstream News Media (msm), Marc Lemire, Mark Glenn, National Zionist Jew Post, New World Order, Palestine, PM Stephen Harper, Political Zionism, RCMP Corruption, Richard Warman, Rothschild Zionist Criminal Cartel, Royal Canadian Mounted Police, sayanim, Sec. 13(1) CHRA, Sec. 319(2) CC "Willful Promotion of Hatred", The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, The Radical Press, World Zionist Organization

Mahatma Gandhi Rejected Zionism by Professor A. K. Ramakrishnan

January 25, 2013 by admin Leave a Comment

Mahatma Gandhi Rejected Zionism

by Professor A. K. Ramakrishnan

Gandhi’s major statement on the Palestine and the Jewish question came forth in his widely circulated editorial in the Harijan of 11 November 1938, a time when intense struggle between the Palestinian Arabs and the immigrant Jews had been on the anvil in Palestine. His views came in the context of severe pressure on him, especially from the Zionist quarters, to issue a statement on the problem. Therefore, he started his piece by saying that his sympathies are all with the Jews, who as a people were subjected to inhuman treatment and persecution for a long time.

“But”, Gandhi asserted, “My sympathy does not blind me to the requirements of justice. The cry for the national home for the Jews does not make much appeal to me. The sanction for it is sought in the Bible and in the tenacity with which the Jews have hankered after their return to Palestine. Why should they not, like other peoples of the earth, make that country their home where they are born and where they earn their livelihood?”

He thus questioned the very foundational logic of political Zionism. Gandhi rejected the idea of a Jewish State in the Promised Land by pointing out that the “Palestine of the Biblical conception is not a geographical tract.” The Zionists, after embarking upon a policy of colonization of Palestine and after getting British recognition through the Balfour Declaration of 1917 for “the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jews,” tried to elicit maximum international support. The Jewish leaders were keen to get an approval for Zionism from Gandhi as his international fame as the leader of a non-violent national struggle against imperialism would provide great impetus for the Jewish cause. But his position was one of total disapproval of the Zionist project both for political and religious reasons. He was against the attempts of the British mandatory Government in Palestine toeing the Zionist line of imposing itself on the Palestinians in the name of establishing a Jewish national home. Gandhi’s Harijan editorial is an emphatic assertion of the rights of the Arabs in Palestine. The following oft-quoted lines exemplify his position: “Palestine belongs to the Arabs in the same sense that England belongs to the English or France to the French. It is wrong and inhuman to impose the Jews on the Arabs… Surely it would be a crime against humanity to reduce the proud Arabs so that Palestine can be restored to the Jews partly or wholly as their national home.”

Gandhi’s response to Zionism and the Palestine question contains different layers of meaning, ranging from an ethical position to political realism. What is interesting is that Gandhi, who firmly believed in the inseparability of religion and politics, had been consistently and vehemently rejecting the cultural and religious nationalism of the Zionists.

What follows then is that he was not for religion functioning as a political ideology; rather, he wanted religion to provide an ethical dimension to nation-State politics. Such a difference was vital as far as Gandhi was concerned. A uni-religious justification for claiming a nation-State, as in the case of Zionism, did not appeal to him in any substantial sense.

The history of Palestine in the first half of this century has been characterized by the contention between two kinds of nationalism: Zionism and Palestinian Arab nationalism-the former striving for creating a Jewish nation in Palestine by colonizing its land through massive Jewish immigration and the latter struggling for freedom of the inhabitants of the land of Palestine from colonial and imperialist control.

Gandhi, in his role as leader of the national struggle and the Indian National Congress (the organization embodying that struggle), had been actively engaged during the 1930s and 1940s in moulding the perception of the people of India to the nationalist and anti-imperialist struggles in the Arab world. The 1937 Calcutta meeting of the All India Congress Committee (AICC) “emphatically protested against the reign of terror as well as the partition proposals relating to Palestine” and expressed the solidarity of the Indian people with the Arab peoples’ struggle for national freedom. The Delhi AICC of September 1938 said in its resolution that Britain should leave the Jews and the Arabs to amicably settle the issues between the two parties, and it urged the Jews “not to take shelter behind British Imperialism.” Gandhi wanted the Jews in Palestine to seek the goodwill of the Arabs by discarding “the help of the British bayonet.”

Gandhi and the Congress thus openly supported Palestinian Arab nationalism, and Gandhi was more emphatic in the rejection of Zionist nationalism. The major political driving force in such a position was the common legacy of anti-imperialist struggle of the Indians and the Palestinians. Gandhi’s views on the Zionist doctrine and his firm commitment to the Palestinian cause starting from the 1930s obviously influenced the design of independent India’s position on the Palestine issue.

Gandhi’s prescription for the Jews in Germany and the Arabs in Palestine was non-violent resistance. With regard to the Jewish problem in Germany, Gandhi noted, “I am convinced that if someone with courage and vision can arise among them to lead them in non-violent action, the winter of their despair can, in the twinkling of an eye, be turned into the summer of hope.” His views on Zionism and his prescription of non-violent action and self-sacrifice to the Jews in Germany generated reactions ranging from anger to despair. Famous Jewish pacifists, Martin Buber, Judah Magnes and Hayim Greenberg, who otherwise admired Gandhi, felt “highly offended by Gandhi’s anti-Zionism” and criticized him for his lack of understanding of the spirit of Zionism. Martin Buber, in a long reply to Gandhi’s Harijan editorial, remarked, “You are only concerned, Mahatma, with the “right of possession” on the one side; you do not consider the right to a piece of free land on the other side – for those who are hungering for it.”

As mentioned earlier, Gandhi refused to view the Zionist “hunger” for land in Palestine as a right. Gandhi wrote on 7 January 1939 the following in response to an editorial in the Statesman, “I hold that non-violence is not merely a personal virtue. It is also a social virtue to be cultivated like the other virtues. Surely society is largely regulated by the expression of non-violence in its mutual dealing. What I ask for is an extension of it on a larger, national and international scale.”

Also, it is significant to note that, as far as Gandhi was concerned, non-violent action was not pacifism or a defensive activity but a way of waging war. This war without violence also requires discipline, training and the assessment of the strength and weakness of the enemy.

According to Paul Power, four factors influenced Gandhi’s position on Zionism:

“First, he was sensitive about the ideas of Muslim Indians who were anti-Zionists because of their sympathy for Middle Eastern Arabs opposed to the Jewish National Home; second, he objected to any Zionist methods inconsistent with his way of non-violence; third, he found Zionism contrary to his pluralistic nationalism, which excludes the establishment of any State based solely or mainly on one religion; and fourth, he apparently believed it imprudent to complicate his relations with the British, who held the mandate in Palestine.”

Gandhi withstood almost all Zionist attempts at extracting a pro-Zionist stance from him. G.H. Jansen wrote about the failure of Zionist lobbying with Gandhi:

“His opposition [to Zionism] remained consistent over a period of nearly 20 years and remained firm despite skilful and varied applications to him of that combination of pressure and persuasion known as lobbying, of which the Zionists are past masters.”

Apart from responses to Gandhi’s anti-Zionism from Jewish pacifists such as Buber, Magnes and Greenberg, Jansen points out at least four separate instances of Zionist attempts to get a favourable statement from Gandhi. At first, Hermann Kallenbach, Gandhi’s Jewish friend in South Africa, came to India in 1937 and stayed for weeks with Gandhi trying to convince him of the merits of the Zionist cause. Then, in the 1930s, as requested by Rabbi Stephen Wise, the American pacifist John Haynes Holmes, tried “to obtain from Gandhi a declaration favourable to Zionism”. In March 1946, a British MP from the Labour Party, Sydney Silverman, an advocate of Indian independence in Britain, attempted to change Gandhi’s mind. At the end of their heated conversation, Gandhi stated that “after all our talk, I am unable to revise the opinion I gave you in the beginning.” The fourth Zionist attempt to change Gandhi’s mind was by Louis Fischer, Gandhi’s famous biographer, to whom Gandhi reported to have said that “the Jews have a good case.”

Later, Gandhi clarified in one of his final pieces on Zionism and the Palestine question on 14 July 1946 that “I did say some such thing in the course of a conversation with Mr. Louis Fischer on the subject.” He added, “I do believe that the Jews have been cruelly wronged by the world.”

Gandhi went back to his initial position by categorically stating that “But in my opinion, they [the Jews] have erred grievously in seeking to impose themselves on Palestine with the aid of America and Britain and now with the aid of naked terrorism… Why should they depend on American money or British arms for forcing themselves on an unwelcome land? Why should they resort to terrorism to make good their forcible landing in Palestine?”

There were an influential number of Jews who thought that force, only force, could ensure the establishment of a Jewish national home in Palestine. They adopted terrorism as the method to achieve their national goal. This policy of subjugation of the Palestinians by Zionist terror was totally rejected by Gandhi in no uncertain terms.

A few months before his assassination, Gandhi answered the question “What is the solution to the Palestine problem?” raised by Doon Campbell of Reuters:

“It has become a problem which seems almost insoluble. If I were a Jew, I would tell them: ‘Do not be so silly as to resort to terrorism…’ The Jews should meet the Arabs, make friends with them and not depend on British aid or American aid, save what descends from Jehovah.”

—
Dr. Ramakrishnan is a senior lecturer, Mahatma Gandhi University, Kottayam, Kerala, India. He presented this paper on June 13, 1998 at a seminar organized by the Institute of Islamic and Arab Studies. The seminar was inaugurated by the chairman of India’s National Minorities Commission, Prof. Tahir Mahmoud, who highlighted the traditional Indian support for the Palestinian struggle against Zionist Occupation.

The United States walked out of the September 2001 World Conference Against Racism because it included two contentious issues: Zionism as racism, and reparations for slavery and colonialism.

Filed Under: All India Congress Committee (AICC), Editor's Zone, Gaza, India, Indian National Congress, Islam, Israel, Israeli Terrorism, Israeli War Crimes, Jewish Racism, Jewish Terrorists, Jews, Louis Fischer, Mahatma Gandhi, Martin Buber, Palestine, Political Zionism, Professor A. K. Ramakrishnan, Zionism, Zionist Atrocities

Zionist-Jew controlled CSIS spy agency joins ADL in smear campaign again the Freeman on the Land movement in Canada

December 30, 2012 by admin Leave a Comment

Zionist-Jew controlled CSIS spy agency joins ADL in smear campaign again the Freeman on the Land movement in Canada

Arthur Topham

December 30, 2012

“A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government”

~ Edward Abbey, Notes from a Secret Journal

When I first saw the heading “CSIS targets Freeman movement” on the front page of the December 29, 2012 edition of the Vancouver Sun, B.C’s foremost Zionist propaganda rag, I knew in an instant that there must be a concerted campaign afoot to start brainwashing Canadians into thinking that the Freeman were some sort of “domestic terrorist” organization out to destroy the nation’s “democratic” system and therefore would have to be taken down by CSIS and the RCMP in the interests of “B’nai Brith Inernational, Harper, national security, the Rothschild bankers, foreign corporations, Israel, Communist China, etc.”

I picked up a copy for reference and took it home only to have my initial gut feeling fully confirmed, in aces.

Here we’ve got Canada’s purported secret spy agency CSIS, aka Canadian Security & Intelligence Service; a traitorous, rogue double agency that’s been trained, just like the RCMP, by Zionist Jew Mossad agents working out of the racist, supremacist state of Israel for years now, starting to set up any one remotely connected to many of the varied groups and organizations here in Canada who have been opposing the ever-growing threat of the New World Order forces that have Harper by the balls as well as Canada’s judiciary and all levels of government from the regional to the federal levels. All of this of course is being orchestrated behind the scenes by the Rothschild’s pivotal front organization B’nai Brith International and its truly terrorist arm that has figured most prominently in the United States of America since 1913 the Anti-Defamation League (ADL).

And so it didn’t come as any great revelation for me to find that half-way through this pathetic smear piece by Zionist stooge Douglas Quan of Postmedia News was a reference to this US terrorist organization stating, “Last month, the Anti-Defamation League published a report that described the so-called ‘sovereign citizen movement’ as ‘one of the most problematic domestic extremist movements in the United States,’ attracting mostly middle-aged or older men who are financially stressed, angry at government regulation or who want ‘something for nothing.’”

The fact alone that CSIS would be working with and relying up “reports” issued by the world’s foremost terrorist and defamation organization, the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai Brith, speaks volumes in terms of just how infiltrated and compromised all of Canada’s government agencies have become thanks to surreptitious and criminally seditious organizations like B’nai Brith Canada and it’s cunningly cruel cousin from the lower 48 the ADL.

Lord knows I have enough exposés on both these traitorous, Zionist, Rothschild, criminal terrorist orgs masquerading as “benevolent” societies on www.radicalpress.com that explain their sordid beginnings and the methods they’ve used over the past century or so infiltrate governments around the world and subvert them to their hate-filled agenda of a one world government totally controlled by the Rothschild Jew criminal cartel.

Just reading all the spin lines that Quan the kowtowing quisling has inserted into his hit piece reminded me of their media smear campaign against myself as soon as I was officially charged with their phoney sec. 319(2) “hate crime” charge back in May of 2012.

Phrases like “anti-government movement”, “domestic extremists”, “issue-based causes, such as environmentalism, anti-capitalism, anti-globalization and far-right racism”, “Freeman members now constitute a major policing problem”, “[Freemen] have occasionally engaged in acts of violence against the police”, “Individuals associated to this movement are a concern because some followers advocate violence to promote their views”, “domestic extremist movements”, “Subjects make continued use of nonsensical legal/quasi-legal jargon”, “‘bluntly idiotic’ arguments”, “gurus”, “con men”, all constitute the standard Zionist Jew smear rhetoric one finds in any and all Zionist Mainstream Media publications today or in their tv and Hollywood propaganda.

Of course I have been working with and publishing much of the literature that is associated with the Freeman movement since 1998 including a healthy portion of articles that deal with what is known as the Detax movement. One of the leading proponents in Canada who has been challenging the federal tax system (designed to fill the coffers of the Rothschild banking cartel) is Dave Lindsay who currently is residing in a jail in Kamloops, B.C. on trumped up charges related to his laudable efforts to inform Canadians about just how the tax system functions and why it it at its root as criminal and unjust as anything else that the Rothschild criminal banking cartel has put in place for the unwary over the past centuries.

Eldon Warman is another name that pops up in any google search of the www.worldfreemansociety.org. Eldon’s work in relation to the fraudulent income tax system is legendary and I’m sure the Jews who control the country via their front flak personnel like CSIS and the RCMP would love to pin some terrorist label on Eldon as well.

For years and years I have been trying to tell the general public that all of their news and views is but a distorted perception of reality handed to them on a daily basis via a media that is completely controlled by the Zionist Jew forces who are out to destroy every nation in the world in order to bring in their one world slave state under the guise of the United Nations Organization, a Rothschild creation first formed in 1945 for this primary purpose.

With each passing day and year I see the tentacles of this monstrous disinformation Beast spreading further and further afield encircling and poisoning everything that it touches with its lies and half-truths and defamations all designed to thwart any effort that might expose their heinous, hate-filled agenda of terror, death and destruction for everyone who doesn’t prostrate themselves before its dark and deeply perverted psychotic plan for world control.

This is but another notice to readers to pay attention to what is planned for the Freeman of the Land movement and anyone else who the ADL might wish to attack with their guilt by association tactics.

Listen up folks! We’re in a perpetual war zone everywhere when it comes to the mainstream media and their lies and it behooves each one of you to be wary of what you read in these Orwellian rags. I’m reminded again of another quote of Edward Abbey’s which I think would be a good closing for this piece. Regard the msm he writes:

“Whenever I read Time or Newsweek or such [Zionist Jew controlled Ed.] magazines, I wash my hands afterwards. But how to wash off the small but odious stain such reading leaves on the mind?”

———–

Filed Under: ADL, Anti Defamation League, Anti-Defamation League (ADL), B'nai Brith Canada, B'nai Brith International, BC HATE CRIME TEAM, Canadian Security & Intelligence Service (CSIS), Canadian Security Intelligence Service, CSIS, Cst Normandie Levas BC HATE CRIME TEAM, David Lindsay, Det-Cst Terry Wilson BC HATE CRIME TEAM, Detax Canada, Editor's Zone, Eldon Warman, Freeman on the Land, Jewish Banking Cartel, Jewish Censorship, Jewish Defense League (JDL), Jewish lobbyists, Jewish Media Monopoly, Jewish power, Jewish Racism, Jewish Supremacism, Jews, Mainstream Mindcontrol Media (M3), Political Zionism, RCMP, RCMP Corruption, Robert Menard Freeman Spokesperson, Rothschild, Rothschild Banking syndicate, Rothschild syndicate, Rothschild Zionist Criminal Cartel, Royal Canadian Mounted Police, worldfreemansociety.org

The Men Who Taste Jews in Their Sandwiches by Jim Goad

December 29, 2012 by admin 1 Comment

[EDITOR'S NOTE: Currently there's some serious cyber fistacuffin' going on in the alternative media ring between proponents who, as this poignant piece below points out, see everything as being a direct result of Jewish malfeasance and every "Jew" equally culpable when it comes to the multi-faceted query known historically as "The Jewish Question" and those who tend to discriminate (oi!) and assign guilt or responsibility only to the ones (and their sycophants) directly responsible for the woes that befall the self-chosen.

The article below is one of the best interpretations of this problem that I've come across. Please take the time to read and share it with others.

Oh yes, and lest I forget... This particular post is also for Det-Cst Terry Wilson of the BC HATE CRIME TEAM who arrested me, traumatized my dear wife, put me in jail and then illegally entered my home and stole all of my computers and firearms back on May 16, 2012. Ever since his shameful, ignoble performance he faithfully reads all of the posts on www.radicalpress.com each day (when he's not reading all of my thousands of personal emails that were on my computers) in order to scrape together "evidence" that he then sends along like a good little school boy tattle tale to Crown council Jennifer Johnston in Quesnel, B.C. who further flaps pages of all of my posts before the eyes of the Judges so as to reinforce the Queen of England's (Regina) false sec. 319(2) CC charge of willfully promoting hatred against "people of the Jewish religion or ethnic group."

On occasion I like to reinforce this person's traitorous behaviour with a graphic showing the evidence covering his face. I know how important it is for Terry to have his mugshot in the media as it helps him and his accomplices to justify in their own petty little minds not only their existence but also that fat pay cheque they get for acting as Orwellian thought police for the foreign lobbyists who currently control Canada's Prime Minister and all of the opposition parties. I am, of course, referring to B'nai Brith 'Canada' the Israeli lobby 5th Column Mossad agency that is responsible for attacking me in the courts for the past six years.

Anyhow, do enjoy this well-written piece by someone I had not heard of until today.]

—————–

http://takimag.com/article/the_men_who_taste_jews_in_their_sandwiches_jim_goad#axzz2GSd5taZI

Notes From the Edge

The Men Who Taste Jews in Their Sandwiches

by Jim Goad

November 19, 2012

I woke up this morning with a bit of a chest cold and decided not to blame the Jews for it. Some mystical yearning deep inside my heart—I believe it’s called “common sense”—led me to surmise that I am probably not afflicted with the Jew Flu.

It’s not that I hold Jews blameless, because they are human beings, too, Shylock, and are therefore not to be trusted. I hold other groups—blacks, feminists, and homosexual sausage-gobbling rump-wranglers—to the same standard. Merely because they find it fashionable to hide behind a shield of historic persecution to further their group interests and seemingly insatiable hunger for power doesn’t mean they are presumed innocent in all situations. I see Jews as human and therefore likely to be up to no good at any given moment.

Then again, neither do I blame the Jews for everything. But there is a tiny, bitter, and relentless subset of individuals who tend to do this reflexively. I call them “The Men Who Taste Jews in Their Sandwiches.” They also taste Jews in the soup they slurp and in the apple pie they eat for dessert.

Merely by stating this, I’m certain I’ll be accused of being afraid to admit that Jews control the sandwich industry.

These types inevitably turn any conversation toward Jews, no matter how little the topic at hand has to do with Jews. If Godwin’s Law predicts that every Internet discussion will inevitably lead to Nazi and Hitler comparisons, these creeps who eagerly leap across the line from logical to pathological are apparently bound by the inexorable forces of Goldman’s Law…or Goldstein’s Law…or Goldberg’s Law. In their diseased brains, all neurons lead to Jews. Perhaps one day this psychological disorder will be diagnosed and a book written about it called The Man Who Mistook His Hat for a Jew.

What’s ironic is the fact that although I don’t personally taste Jews in my sandwiches unless I’m eating a Reuben with kosher pickles, I likely ask some of the same questions as do the schmucks who even taste Jews in a slice of Wonder Bread with mayonnaise. I’m drawn to the Jewish Question merely because it’s such an untouchable topic. I realize that the mere act of questioning Jewish power and influence is a career-killer in much of the West, and that in certain countries asking certain questions about the Holocaust is enough to get you jailed. It’s one topic about which most “irreverent” and “non-PC” people are extremely reverent and effusively PC. I’ve also noticed that it’s a topic that many people are eager to talk about off the record but terrified to mention in public.

So here’s where I stand on Jews…OK, wait, roll back the tape…I don’t literally stand on Jews, because that would clearly be anti-Semitic. Here are some ancillary questions I have concerning the Jewish Question, and if it makes me anti-Semitic merely to ask them, I suppose I won’t be invited to your son’s Bar Mitzvah. If you want to crucify me merely for asking questions, well, I guess you’re one of The Men Who Tastes Nazis in Your Sandwiches.

The Jewish Question always seemed to lead to more questions than answers, so here goes:

• Are Jews members of an ethnic tribe or members of a religion? If the latter, how do you explain Jewish atheists? What exactly is a “Semite,” and why does the term “anti-Semitism” seem to embrace people who appear to be of Eastern European derivation while it tends to exclude Arabs and other indigenous Middle Easterners?

• If you’re so secure that the evidence surrounding the Holocaust is irrefutable, then why jail people who question the evidence? Why does the Western media feel compelled to mention the Holocaust almost daily while it routinely ignores the 30-50 million non-Jewish civilians—not soldiers, but civilians—who were killed in World War II? Were their lives not nearly as important?

• Why are certain “right-wing” writers brave enough to criticize communism, open immigration, the liberal media, and political correctness while they’re mortified to even consider that Jews were often the primary architects behind such movements—or at least disproportionately represented?

• Isn’t the idea of “God’s Chosen People” cosmically racist and supremacist? Is the Talmud not hostile to goyim? Haven’t the Jews historically been racially separatist, all while accusing other groups of “racism”?

• Is it even remotely possible that Jewish behavior, rather than a murkily mystical and ultimately unprovable notion such as “anti-Semitism,” sometimes led to negative perceptions about Jews? Even once throughout history?

• In a European Union document calling for “equal treatment between persons irrespective of racial or ethnic origin,” why does it urge that we should focus “in particular” on “anti-Semitism” if everyone is to be treated equally?

• Why does our current cultural climate allow one to decry “white privilege” but never “Jewish privilege,” especially since Jews are undeniably overrepresented statistically when it comes to wealth and power?

• At the moment, Israel and some of its enemies are lobbing missiles at one another. Why should I care about Israel? Why should I deem this dubiously founded and eternally disruptive nation so important that it’s worth starting World War III, shoveling out tax dollars, and enduring much of the world’s wrath to protect it? What do I get out of the deal?

So those are my questions. I won’t hold my goyishe breath waiting for you to answer them. But dismissing them outright as “paranoid” or “anti-Semitic” is either dishonest or naïve.

My questions are honest and sincere rather than “hateful,” and calling me all the nasty names in the Torah won’t budge my feelings or cause me to relent. And I believe that a huge quotient of the population has similar questions but have been terrorized into silence at the mere thought of asking them. As a truth-seeker rather than a team-joiner, I find this troublesome. So sue me!

And this is the main reason why The Men Who Taste Jews in Their Sandwiches are such a pain in my tuchis. They live up to the crude stereotype of rabid, delusional anti-Semites, and by so doing, they tend to allow all criticism of Jews to be painted with the same broad Jew Brush. They’re the ones who tend to give so-called “anti-Semites” a bad name. It almost makes me suspect that some of them may be Mossad agents.

Making EVERYTHING about Jews gives Jews far too much credit. So ease up, fellas. There are no Jews in your sandwiches. There are no Jews in your soup. If you have a chest cold, you likely didn’t get it from shaking hands with a Jew…or maybe you did, but that’s what you get for being friendly to Jews.

——–

Please share this article by using the link below. When you cut and paste an article, Taki’s Magazine misses out on traffic, and our writers don’t get paid for their work. Email editors@takimag.com to buy additional rights. http://takimag.com/article/the_men_who_taste_jews_in_their_sandwiches_jim_goad/print#ixzz2GSfhBxgg

Filed Under: "Canadian Parliamentary Coalition to Combat Anti-Semiti, "hate speech", "Jewish" holocaust, 'state' of Israel, Abrams/BBC v. Arthur Topham & RadicalPress.com, AIPAC, Alternative Media, Anti-Defamation League (ADL), anti-Semitism, Anti-ZionistCanada Yahoo Group, Ashkenazi Jews, B'nai Brith Canada, B.C. Supreme Court, BC HATE CRIME TEAM, BC Justice Minister Shirley Bond, Canadian Charter of Rights & Freedoms, Canadian Federation of Chabad Lubavitch, Canadian Human Rights Act, Canadian Human Rights Commission, Canadian Human Rights Tribunal, Canadian Identity/Sovereignty, Canadian Jewish Congress, Canadian Politics, CC Johnston, Chabad Lubavich Cult, Crown Council Jennifer Johnston, Cst Normandie Levas BC HATE CRIME TEAM, Det-Cst Terry Wilson BC HATE CRIME TEAM, Editor's Zone, Ernst Zundel, Fredrick Toben, Free Speech on the Internet, Freedom of Expression, Freedom of Speech, Freedom of Thought, Harry Abrams, Hasbara, Hate Crime laws, Hate Hunter Wilson, HOLODOMOR, Honourable Justice Morgan, Internet Freedom, Israeli Terrorism, Israeli War Crimes, Jewish Holocaust Industry, Jewish Lobby Groups, Jewish Media Monopoly, Jewish power, Jewish Racism, Jewish Supremacism, Jewish Talmudists, Jewish Terrorists, Jews, Jim Goad, Judaism, League for Human Rights of B'nai Brith Canada, Lonnie Landrud, MP Steven Harper War Criminal, National(Zionist)Post, Political Prisoners, Political Zionism, Quesnel BC, Quesnel Court House, Quesnel RCMP, RadicalPress.com, RCMP Corruption, Richard Warman, Rothschild Zionist Criminal Cartel, Royal Canadian Mounted Police, Sec. 319(2) CC "Willful Promotion of Hatred", Shylock, Taki's Magazine, The Babylonian Talmud, The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, Torah, Ukrainian Holocaust, World Zionist Organization, Zionism

Zionist Terror Tactics – a political cartoon from RadicalPress.com

December 2, 2012 by admin Leave a Comment

Filed Under: "hate speech", Abe Foxman, Abrams/B'nai Brith Canada v. Arthur Topham and RadicalP, Anti-Defamation League (ADL), anti-Semitism, Anti-Zionist Canada, Ashkenazi Jews, B'nai Brith Canada, B.C. Politics, B.C. Supreme Court, Babylonian Talmud, BC HATE CRIME TEAM, Bosheviks, Canadian Charter of Rights & Freedoms, Canadian Identity/Sovereignty, Canadian Jewish Congress, Canadian Jewish Defense League, Canadian Judicial System, Canadian traitors, Cheka, Christian Zionists, Crown Council Jennifer Johnston, Cst Normandie Levas BC HATE CRIME TEAM, Det-Cst Terry Wilson BC HATE CRIME TEAM, Ezra Levant, Freedom of Expression, Freedom of Speech, Freedom of Thought, Gaza, George Orwell, Harry Abrams, Hate Crime laws, Honourable Justice Morgan, Irwin Cotler, Israel, Jewish Banking Cartel, Jewish Censorship, Jewish Crime, Jewish Defense League (JDL), Jewish Hatred, Jewish Lobby Groups, Jewish Media Monopoly, Jewish Racism, Jewish Supremacism, Jewish Talmudists, Jewish Terrorists, Jews, Josef Stalin, Judeo-Christianity, Karl Marx, KGB, Kol Nidre prayer, Lonnie Landrud, Netfirms.com, Pharisaic Judaism, Pharisees, Political Prisoners, Political Zionism, Quesnel RCMP, RCMP Corruption, Richard Warman, Robert Pickton, Rothschild Banking syndicate, Rothschild Zionist Criminal Cartel, Sec. 319(2) CC "Willful Promotion of Hatred", terrorist Stern Gang, The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, THE ZUNDEL TRIAL & FREE SPEECH, Ukrainian Holocaust, World Jewry, World Zionist Organization, Zach P, Zionist Atrocities, Zionist Jews in Russia

Ashkenazi European Zionist Jews don’t speak for ALL Jews – Shazer Everquar

November 29, 2012 by admin Leave a Comment

http://shazereverquar.wordpress.com/antisemitic/antisemitism-card/

[EDITOR'S NOTE: I received a copy of the following email from Shazer Everquar of Harrison, Arkansas USA yesterday. In his letter to Netfirm.com's corporate axeman Zach P he not only tears a strip off 'Det' Terry Wilson of the 'BC HATE CRIME TEAM' but also includes a very interesting short video that highlights another aspect of the racist, supremacist mindset of those Zionist Jews who control not only Israel but the majority of Western governments via their behind-the-scenes 'advisers' and lobbyists like B'nai Brith Canada.

In further communications with Shazer Everquar I learned a bit more about his side of the story when it comes to America's Zionist attack dog, the ADL or Anti-Defamation League, which is but one more tentacle protruding forth from the main body known as B'nai Brith International which is the creation of the Rothschild criminal cartel now attacking freedom of speech globally through their implanted "hate laws".
Do take the time to watch this video as it illustrates a good point; one that most of us have never contemplated.]
———————-
Dear NetFirms (Zach P),

I am a former customer and once had the site, thinkmasa.org which was hosted by you.

As an African-American, I am particularly outraged at the racist tactics of the bigot known as Det-Cst Terry Wilson. It is a FACT that White Jews are responsible for the Atlantic SLAVE trade and are SO racist that they even call BLACK JEWS “anti-semites!”??

The fact that this so-called “detective” is supporting a PROVEN RACIST PROVOCATION ORGANIZATION reveals that such an “investigation” is highly suspect.

Click the above link and watch for yourself the video which PROVES these guys are quite corrupt.

If White Jews are allowed to attack Black Jews in the name of “anti-semitism” then where will it end ???? Surely a Gentile doesn’t stand a chance under those conditions.??Please be fair and take a good look at ALL the facts.

Thank you.

Sincerely,

Shazer Everquar

Harrison, Arkansas USA
——————————
Further comments from a subsequent communication with Shazer Everquar:

Dear Editor:

I had to write because, as you noticed, that video was tailor-made for your case.

About NetFirms.com: I went with them because I wanted to be hosted outside of the US. But as my email suggests, eventually I moved my blog to another company (Blue Host). Suddenly, I was getting all sorts of tech help that I never got from NetFirms.com. I didn’t realize how lousy they were until I left them.

So what you’re saying about them not responding is just a continuation of the fact that they don’t respond to ANYTHING. They just collect your money.

If you’re not required to host in Canada, consider moving your blog to another country such as the Netherlands or better yet, the Isle of Man. Then the Canadian ADL won’t be able to touch you.

I’m sympathetic to your cause. January 13th, 2012 I was released from over 16 months of incarceration without a trial by Zionist Jews. When I was set free they went through my wallet and took my social security card and my driver’s license.

While I was incarcerated all of my belongings were stolen. I mean ALL. Car, clothes, everything. My best and only friend has been supporting me out of his own pocket for nearly a year because one cannot get a job without ID.

While I was incarcerated, a Zionist judge wrote an order that I was not to have access to the internet “for any purpose”!

I know from personal experience how the Jews terrorize those who oppose their quest for world domination.

I’m writing this to you at a library, which is my only source to the internet. My last blog, “thinkmasa.org” went down while I was incarcerated.

The Zionists taught me that what they hated the most was my blog. So until I’m able to get an ID and raise money, I’m hosted on wordpress.com. If I’m arrested and jailed, the blog stays up.

The Jews blacklisted me and no lawyer would represent me. It was actually a blessing in disguise. I would help you but I don’t know how Canada works. However you can find out and it will be well worth it.

My new blog is not very developed since it’s only been around since June of this year and I’m only able to work on it from libraries, (I.E. a max of 7 hours a day).

I’m amazed to see that most of the so-called anti-zionist websites are actually run by the Zionists. The blatant anti-zionist sites are either run by Jews or racists bankrolled by Jews. It’s very clever actually. You gotta give these monsters credit.

The conscious and unconscious Christian Zionists are the lynchpin. Unseat the Zionist hold on the Christian mentality and the whole house of cards will come tumbling down.

Keep Fighting, we’re winning!

Shazer Everquar

Filed Under: "hate speech", Abe Foxman, Africa, Anti-Defamation League (ADL), anti-Semitism, Anti-ZionistCanada Yahoo Group, Ashkenazi Jews, B'nai Brith Canada, B'nai Brith International, Babylonian Talmud, BC HATE CRIME TEAM, Black America, Black Jews, Canadian Charter of Rights & Freedoms, Canadian Identity/Sovereignty, Canadian Judicial System, Charter of Rights & Freedoms, Christian Zionists, Christianity, Crown Council Jennifer Johnston, Crown of England, Cst Normandie Levas BC HATE CRIME TEAM, Det-Cst Terry Wilson BC HATE CRIME TEAM, Douglas H. Christie, Editor's Zone, Ezra Levant, Freedom of Expression, Freedom of Speech, Gentiles, Harry Abrams, Hasbara, Hate Crime laws, Internet Freedom, Israeli Terrorism, Jewish Anti-Zionists, Jewish Banking Cartel, Jewish Censorship, Jewish Defense League (JDL), Jewish Hatred, Jewish Holocaust Industry, Jewish Holocaust Lie, Jewish lobbyists, Jewish Media Monopoly, Jewish Racism, Jewish Talmudists, Jews, Judeo-Christianity, League for Human Rights of B'nai Brith Canada, Mainstream Mindcontrol Media (M3), Marc Lemire, Netfirms.com, Palestine, Paul Fromm (CAFE), Pharisaic Judaism, Political Prisoners, Political Zionism, Queen of England, Quesnel BC, Quesnel RCMP, RadicalPress.com, RCMP Corruption, Regina, Rothschild Zionist Criminal Cartel, sayanim, Sec. 319(2) CC "Willful Promotion of Hatred", The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, Ukrainian Holocaust, World Zionist Organization, Zach P, Zionism, Zionist Atrocities

Anonymous takes down over 9000 Jewish websites

November 17, 2012 by admin Leave a Comment

FreePalestine

Greetings World

For far too long, Anonymous has stood by with the rest of the world and watched in despair the barbaric, brutal and despicable treatment of the Palestinian people in the so called Ã¢â‚¬Å“Occupied TerritoriesÃ¢â‚¬Â by the Israel Defense Force. Like so many around the globe, we have felt helpless in the face of such implacable evil. And todayÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s insane attack and threatened invasion of Gaza was more of the same.

child sacrifice

GazaChildVictim2 ”

GazaChildVictim1

But when the government of Israel publicly threatened to sever all Internet and other telecommunications into and out of Gaza they crossed a line in the sand. As the former dictator of Egypt Mubarack learned the hard way Ã¢â‚¬â€œ we are ANONYMOUS and NO ONE shuts down the Internet on our watch. To the IDF and government of Israel we issue you this warning only once. Do NOT shut down the Internet into the Ã¢â‚¬Å“Occupied TerritoriesÃ¢â‚¬Â, and cease and desist from your terror upon the innocent people of Palestine or you will know the full and unbridled wrath of Anonymous. And like all the other evil governments that have faced our rage, you will NOT survive it unscathed.

To the people of Gaza and the Ã¢â‚¬Å“Occupied TerritoriesÃ¢â‚¬Â, know that Anonymous stands with you in this fight. We will do everything in our power to hinder the evil forces of the IDF arrayed against you. We will use all our resources to make certain you stay connected to the Internet and remain able to transmit your experiences to the world. As a start, we have put together the Anonymous Gaza Care Package Ã¢â‚¬â€œ http://bit.ly/XH87C5 Ã¢â‚¬â€œ which contains instructions in Arabic and English that can aid you in the event the Israel government makes good on itÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s threat to attempt to sever your Internet connection. It also contains useful information on evading IDF surveillance, and some basic first aid and other useful information. We will continue to expand and improve this document in the coming days, and we will transmit it to you by every means at our disposal. We encourage you to download this package, and to share it with your fellow Palestinians to the best of your ability.

We will be with you. No matter how dark it may seem, no matter how alone and abandoned you may feel Ã¢â‚¬â€œ know that tens of thousands of us in Anonymous are with you and working tirelessly around the clock to bring you every aid and assistance that we can.

We Are Anonymous

We Are Everywhere

We Are Legion

We Do Not Forgive

We Do Not Forget

To the oppressors of the innocent Palestinian people, it is too late to EXPECT US

Filed Under: 'state' of Israel, Anti-War Activism, Arab Perspectives, B'nai Brith, Babylonian Talmud, Editor's Zone, Elizabeth Dilling, Gaza, Harry Abrams, Internet Freedom, Israeli Terrorism, Jewish Lobby, Jewish Media Monopoly, Jews, Law & Justice, Mainstream Mindcontrol Media (M3), Middle East, Palestine, Political Prisoners, Political Zionism, Richard Warman, The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, Ukrainian Holocaust, Zionist Atrocities

Jewish Global News Service runs Radical Press Smear Story

November 7, 2012 by admin Leave a Comment

http://www.jta.org/news/article/2012/11/07/3111311/canadian-miner-charged-for-anti-jewish-website
JTALogo

JTA: The Global News Service of the Jewish People

Canadian miner charged for anti-Jewish website
November 7, 2012

(JTA) – A Canadian miner was charged with a hate crime for anti-Jewish content on his website.

Arthur Topham, 65, of Quesnel in British Columbia, was charged Monday with promoting hatred against an identifiable group on his website, Radical Press. Topham has run the website, described by the local media as anti-Zionist, since 1998.

The charge comes six months after a criminal investigation into the website’s content was launched, according to the Toronto Sun.

Topham also was charged with a firearms-related offense. He is due back in a British Columbia court on Thursday.

Complaints against the website, which has referred to Jews as snakes and Zionists and posted the anti-Semitic hoax “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion,” date back to 2007.

“Judging from the wording of this indictment, it looks like it’s going to be a battle between the Christians and the Jews,” Topham wrote in a post on his website Monday.

Topham’s lawyer, Doug Christie, has defended Holocaust deniers Ernst Zundel and James Keegstra. Christie told a British Columbia news radio station that Zionism is a political belief, “albeit connected effectively to Jewish groups, Jewish ideas,” and that opposing a political belief is not a crime.

——

Filed Under: 'state' of Israel, 911, Alternative Media, Arthur Topham/ Contributor, Babylonian Talmud, Canadian Human Rights Act, Canadian Human Rights Commission, Canadian Human Rights Tribunal, Canadian Identity/Sovereignty, Canadian Jewish Congress, Canadian Politics, Christianity, Douglas Christie, Editor's Zone, Elizabeth Dilling, Ernst Zundel, Freedom of Expression, Freedom of Thought, Gaza, Germany, Harry Abrams, Internet Freedom, Israeli Terrorism, Jewish Banking Cartel, Jewish Global News Service, Jewish Holocaust Industry, Jewish Lobby, Jewish Media Monopoly, Jews, Jews Behind Bolshevik Revolution, Judaism, Law & Justice, Marc Lemire, Middle East, Orthodox Jews Against Zionism, Palestine, Political Prisoners, Political Zionism, Religion, Richard Warman, The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, Ukrainian Holocaust, Zionist Atrocities

The Military Solution by J. Bruce Campbell

August 5, 2011 by admin

VTlogo
JBCampLogo

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/07/29/the-military-solution/

The Military Solution

Photobucket

By J. Bruce Campbell

Friday, July 29th, 2011

As a Rhodesian anti-terrorist in the early Ã¢â‚¬Ëœ70s, I figured that the combination of normal African cruelty with Jewish Communism was the ultimate in political sadism. The atrocities I witnessed were shocking and revolting.

It turned out that my education was incomplete. I was not fully aware of what America had done or would do in the decades to come. It took a few years after returning home to see what the future held for us Americans.

The American military has up to the present date not covered itself in glory. Military glory can only be obtained in the defense of the nation from unprovoked military attack by another country. LetÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s disabuse ourselves of smug ideas that Ft. Sumter and Pearl Harbor were unprovoked attacks.

There have been no unprovoked attacks since the War for Independence from England. Starting in 1861 and ever since, the American military has been the aggressor, controlled and exploited by American politicians on behalf of private bankers.

We Americans were born in a country founded on a violent and treacherous land grab from the original inhabitants, who themselves did not deal in real estate sales or mortgage fraud. Virtually every treaty made by the US government was broken by the US Army, which conducted the first modern extermination program, today known as Ã¢â‚¬Å“ethnic cleansing.Ã¢â‚¬Â

The legal system of a country based on African slavery and extermination of its natives can only be an exercise in fraud and hypocrisy.

The behavior of the American military in the 20th Century and now in the 21st has been shockingly savage and sadistic, with scores of millions of dead foreigners who threatened us not in the least. The suffering of the survivors cannot be calculated.

The American wars of the 20th and 21st Centuries were fought and are being fought for Jewish profit and for the artificial Jewish enclave known as Israel. This Jewish enclave appears to exert total power over the American military.

Back in 1979 I spoke with the former Wall Street banker and congressional investigator for the Reece Committee, Norman Dodd. In 1953 Mr. Dodd elicited the statement from Rowan Gaither, then president of the Ford Foundation, that his and the other tax-exempt foundations were committing their subversion to alter life in the US so that this country could be comfortably merged with the Soviet Union.

Mr. DoddÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s impatient first words in 1979 were, Ã¢â‚¬Å“We have over-diagnosed the problem.Ã¢â‚¬Â These soon became this writerÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s sentiments, which led to an attempt to form the basic resistance movement ten years later which I for political purposes called Ã¢â‚¬Å“the militia.Ã¢â‚¬Â All of my contributions to VT have offered solutions rather than mere analysis, thanks to Norman DoddÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s advice.

The militia was a movement with a narrow window of opportunity to attack the Council on Foreign Relations and other Jewish agencies before the movement was infiltrated by FBI, military and police agents who would ultimately slaughter scores of federal employees and their children to stop this armed and potentially powerful phenomenon.

The merger contemplated by the Ford Foundation is obsolete in the literal sense. But the fact is that America has become the Soviet Union, so that an official merger became unnecessary.

The US Army is now the Red Army. The US Army and the Red Army were military partners from 1941 to 1945 and worked closely for another three years to slaughter millions of helpless Germans and Jew-wise Europeans until the lucrative Cold War was started. Suddenly, the partners became Ã¢â‚¬Å“enemies.Ã¢â‚¬Â In a few decades, the Soviet Union had served its purpose and was dissolved. America then became the Communist monster with no counter-balance.

1948 was also the year that PalestineÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s name was changed and that sad country became the poisonous Jewish headquarters for war, treachery, repression and chaos.

Obviously, this writer is anti-military. Anyone who would start a civilian resistance movement is anti-military. But there is only one organization that can remove Israel as the number one threat to life on this planet. That organization is the US military.

Now, Israel has not slaughtered millions of Iraqis or untold numbers of Afghans, Pakistanis and Libyans. Israel did not slaughter millions of Germans after World War II. The American military has done that, due to some mysterious control of it by American and Israeli Jews.

Again, the US military has not covered itself in glory. It is covered by Jewish slime. The US military is a disgrace and has always been a disgrace. It must be purged of its subversive agents of Judaism.

American and Israeli Jews exercise control of the US military via Freemasonry and homosexuality, both of which are rampant in the senior officer class of the Army, Marine Corps, Air Force and Navy, according to the courageous revelations of Kay Griggs, the former wife of Marine Colonel George Griggs. The colonel revealed to his wife that the senior officer class participates in the vilest forms of Ã¢â‚¬Å“male bonding,Ã¢â‚¬Â done for the purposes of mind control and obedience to illegal orders, which include assassination.

Israel, with American Jewish permission, has threatened to unleash its weapons of mass destruction on the capitals of Europe. Reports persist here that Israel has planted nuclear weapons in American cities that will be detonated if Israel is not obeyed.

Other credible reports indicate that Israel was responsible for the Japanese nuclear disaster in retaliation for JapanÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s support of the Palestinians in the UN. Also that Israel attempted to kill GermanyÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s president for the same reason (sabotaged helicopter) and that the Norwegian slaughter of children was for that countryÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s pro-Palestinian position.

This level of threatened and actual mass murder can only be thwarted by the masters of mass murder, the US military, which has been under the Jewish spell since at least 1861. There is only one way that the US military can redeem itself and rescue the world from the fruit of its sadistic behavior on behalf of Judaism. Judaism must be removed as a threat to life on this planet and prevented from ever rising again.

It is time that the US military cleanse itself of Jewish agents, Freemasons and homosexuals, all of whom serve Jewish finance capitalism and the state of Israel. The US militaryÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s routine slaughtering of foreigners who are in the way of Jewish plundering must stop.

The US military must remove all weapons of mass destruction possessed by Israel, as demanded by John F. Kennedy in the months leading up to his assassination.

Humanity will never be safe until artificial Jewish domination is ended.

America must inevitably experience a military coup to rescue itself from Jewish Rule, which has saturated our political, social and legal systems. Jewish Rule is why America is so sick and degenerate and overrun by aliens.

This is not far-fetched, as we can plainly see with the sudden and unexpected fall of the House of Murdoch. This Jewish propaganda machine is self-destructing. The rest of the Hollywood /New York axis must also be dismantled. Jews must not be allowed in any positions of power or influence, ever again.

We can see what has happened in the past once this effort is begun. Jewish retribution comes in the form of mass annihilation. In those days, the true nature of Judaism was not understood. The Ã¢â‚¬Å“newspaper of record,Ã¢â‚¬Â the New York Times, deliberately concealed from its readers the truth of what a bunch of New York Jews did to the Russian, Ukrainian and other peoples, with American help, starting in 1917.

Most Americans did not understand the Jewish declaration of war against Germany in 1933, or what it would lead to. Some did, the members of the America First Committee, but they were silenced by the FDR-contrived attack on Pearl Harbor.

The American military is the key to survival, just as it has been the key to Jewish Rule. Like fire, it is a dangerous servant and an even more dangerous master. And, as with everything else in life, it depends on good men in charge Ã¢â‚¬â€œ always a problem.

There just might be enough good men in the American military who have the guts and the brains to seize control of the murder machine and arrest the traitors who have been propelled to the top by bootlicking, degeneracy and moral cowardice.

You lieutenants and captains and majors who arenÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t on the make can seize control and end the slaughter and torture of innocents. You know damn well that no one in Guantanamo is guilty of anything other than resisting American barbarism. And thatÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s if heÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s not just some cab driver you stupidly bought for three grand.

Think back on the disgrace of Abu Ghraib and reflect on how such a thing could happen. Abu Ghraib, Bagram, Guantanamo, prison ships, renditions, torture, mass murder, depleted uranium munitions that have produced deformed babies of your own, not to mention the horrors in Iraq. You are in total disgrace for your participation in crimes against humanity.

Of course, you were just following orders given by draft-dodging pukes in DC. You still are. Honestly, how could you take orders from a soft piece of chicken-shit such as Dick Cheney? Or an obvious lying spook such as Barack Obama? Are you that delusional? That impotent? Maybe not.

America is dead, and much of the blame comes from the crimes of the US military in the 19th, 20th and 21st Centuries. We can bring it back to life, which will take a while, but it canÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t be done without the revolt of the US military and the overthrow of the war lords, the finance lords and the propaganda lords headquartered in Washington DC, New York and Tel Aviv.

———-

Filed Under: 'state' of Israel, Afghanistan, Arab Perspectives, Communism, Council on Foreign Relations, Editor's Zone, Gaza, Germany, Iran, Iraq, Israeli Terrorism, J. Bruce Campbell, Jewish Banking Cartel, Jewish Holocaust Industry, Jewish Lobby, Jewish Media Monopoly, Jews, Judaism, Middle East, Norman Dodd, Palestine, Political Prisoners, Political Zionism, The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, U.S. 'War' on Terror, U.S. Foreign/Domestic Policies, U.S. Terrorism, U.S. Torture, Ukrainian Holocaust, VeteransToday, Zionist Atrocities, Zionist Jews in Russia

Canada clamps down on Israel criticism

July 22, 2011 by admin

RADLOGOLATEST

Dear Radical Reader,

The world is still bewitched to a great degree by the mesmerizing effects of the vipers who control the mainstream media and, by default, the thoughts, ideas, impressions, images and political perspectives of the general public.

Those, such as the despicable, disgusting traitors and groveling sycophantic sell-outs to Jewish Israeli greed, power and racism pictured below, are exemplary models of the type of political “leader” that the Zionist behemoth surreptitiously fabricates and then sells to the stupefied electorate via their Big Brother media.

One of most vile of all of course is the two-faced, bigot, hypocrite and seditious Irwin Cotler former Liberal head honcho over the Supreme Court of Canada. He’s the head snake, slithering about the halls of parliament and wending his way into every nook and cranny and committee like some latter day Chaim Weizmann laying out the groundwork for this latest assault upon Canada and our rights as free, democratic citizens.

cotlercreep
IRWIN COTLER -
SNAKE IN THE GRASS
______________________

As has been the case for the past century and longer behind every head of state you will find a Zionist Jew (or two) who secretly guides and controls the actions of these so-called free democracies on behalf of their taskmasters in Tel Aviv, London and Washington, D.C. Precisely who is pulling Harper’s chain is unknown to me at this time but I have absolutely no doubt that both he and that fat faced fool of his, Kenny the Kromagnon, have sold their souls to the synagogue of Satan a long, long time ago. By their fruits shall ye know them as the Christian good book tells us and in the case of these two unabashed buffoons the thought that they might somehow be actual Canadian nationalists with at least a modicum of sovereignty in their souls is beyond comprehension. Like two rotten apples purposely placed in that basket of bungling bureaucracy known as Ottawa they are doing their damnedest to turn the whole carton of potentially pro-Israeli cretins into one rotten heap of corruption.

KennyJewHat
KENNY THE KROMAGNON WITH HIS LITTLE JEWISH YARMULKE FIRMLY AFFIXED
____________________________________________________________________

The CPCCA, also known as the Communist Party Committee to Crucify Anti-Zionists, is just one more Trojan Horse that the racist rats in Tel Aviv have trotted out of their stable and shipped off to every “democratic” nation throughout the west to continue their endless, fanatical pursuit of censorship in the name of unholy Zion.

As my own anti-Zionist Jewish mother-in-law (God bless her soul) use to say, “Enough already!” Enough of this endless stinking shit the Jew-controlled media calls “news” and “public opinion” and “parliamentary committees” and “anti-Semitism.” These wankers of pseudo-wisdom and “democracy” and “freedom” need to be exposed for what they really are: TRAITORS AND LIARS AND WAR CRIMINALS FOR THE RACIST, APARTHEID, SUPREMACIST, ZIONIST-JEW, FALSE STATE KNOWN AS ISRAEL.

Like all the other Zionist Jew crooks and criminals and frauds who are tumbling out of their darkened closets almost daily now these pitiful examples of the human species need to be exposed in as many venues and ways as possible.

One way would be to pass this post along to everyone you know.

Sincerely,

Arthur Topham
Pub/Ed
RadicalPress.com
______________

http://www.ikners.com/?p=24221
Canada clamps down on Israel criticism.

July 22, 2011

HarperTraitor
Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper, a staunch supporter of Israeli policy, has described criticism of Israeli as a form of Ã¢â‚¬Ânew anti-SemitismÃ¢â‚¬Å“.

Nearly two years after the first hearings were held in Ottawa, the Canadian Parliamentary Committee to Combat Anti-Semitism (CPCCA) released a detailed report on July 7 that found that anti-Semitism is on the rise in Canada, especially on university campuses.

While the CPCCAÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s final report does contain some cases of real anti-Semitism, the committee has provided little evidence that anti-Semitism has actually increased in Canada in recent years. Instead, it has focused a disproportionate amount of effort and resources on what it calls a so-called Ã¢â‚¬Å“new anti-SemitismÃ¢â‚¬Â: criticism of Israel.

Indeed, the real purpose of the CPCCA committee seems to be to stifle critiques of Israeli policy and disrupt pro-Palestinian solidarity organizing in Canada, including, most notably, Israeli Apartheid Week events. Many of the CPCCAÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s findings, therefore, must be rejected as both an attack on freedom of speech and freedom of protest, and as recklessly undermining the fight against real instances of anti-Semitism.

The CPCCA and its findings

The Canadian Parliamentary Committee to Combat Anti-Semitism (CPCCA) was born out of a conference held in London in February 2009 by the Inter-Parliamentary Committee for Combating Anti-Semitism. Formed in March 2009 and not directly linked to the Canadian government, or to any NGO or advocacy group, the CPCCA included 22 Canadian Parliament members from across party lines. Former Liberal MP Mario Silva chaired the Inquiry Panel and Conservative MP Scott Reid led the Steering Committee.

Between November 2009 and January 2010, the CPCCA held ten separate hearings during which time representatives of various non-governmental organizations, religious institutions, police departments and Canadian and Israeli universities presented papers meant to assess the level of anti-Semitism in Canada. While groups critical of Israel were denied the chance to address the committee, major Zionist organizations like BÃ¢â‚¬â„¢nai Brith Canada, Friends of the Simon Wiesenthal Center for Holocaust Studies, and the Canadian Jewish Congress were welcomed.

Ã¢â‚¬Å“Much of todayÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s anti-Semitism manifests in anti-Israel agitation around boycotts, divestment and sanctions,Ã¢â‚¬Â said Avi Benlolo, President and CEO of the Friends of the Simon Wiesenthal Center for Holocaust Studies, during a hearing in November 2009. Ã¢â‚¬Å“It deploys an unfair double standard against the Jewish state, singling out of Israel alone for one-sided, harsh criticism and calls for punitive actions.Ã¢â‚¬Â

Throughout the consultation process, the CPCCA regularly focused on Canadian university campuses, which were routinely described as hotbeds of anti-Semitism, where Jewish students or students with pro-Israel leanings are often intimidated and threatened. This accusation was made repeatedly, and included in the CPCCAÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s final report, despite the fact that Dr. Fred Lowy, President Emeritus of Concordia University in Montreal, stated in his address to the CPCCA that, Ã¢â‚¬Å“by and large, Canadian campuses are safe and are not hotbeds of anti-Semitism of any kindÃ¢â‚¬Â.

In its final report, the CPCCA made about two dozen recommendations on how best to fight anti-Semitism in Canada. While the report states that Ã¢â‚¬Å“criticism of Israel is not anti-Semitic, and saying so is wrongÃ¢â‚¬Â, it also found that Ã¢â‚¬Å“singling Israel out for selective condemnation and opprobrium Ã¢â‚¬Â¦ is discriminatory and hatefulÃ¢â‚¬Â and many of its recommendations deal with combating this Ã¢â‚¬Å“new anti-SemitismÃ¢â‚¬Â.

A major recommendation issued by the CPCCA was that the Canadian government should promote the working definition of anti-Semitism used by The European Union Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia (EUMC). This definition categorizes Ã¢â‚¬Å“applying double standards by requiring of [Israel] a behavior not expected or demanded of any other democratic nationÃ¢â‚¬Â as anti-Semitic.

In other words, the CPCCA is supporting a definition whereby individuals who focus their attention on Israeli human rights violations, yet donÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t level an equal amount of condemnation on other states for their human rights violations, can be labeled as anti-Semitic. This is obviously problematic since Palestine solidarity activists – like any other people Ã¢â‚¬â€œ have commitments that make it impossible to engage with every issue they are otherwise interested in. They shouldnÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t be labeled as anti-Semitic due to their inability to participate in every single human rights struggle happening around the world.

Another dangerous recommendation made by the CPCCA was that Canadian university administrators should condemn Ã¢â‚¬Å“discourse, events and speakers which are untrue, harmful, or not in the interest of academic discourse, including Israeli Apartheid WeekÃ¢â‚¬Â. Even the use of the word Ã¢â‚¬Å“apartheidÃ¢â‚¬Â in relation to Israel is anti-Semitic, the CPCCA found, since it amounts to the Ã¢â‚¬Å“denial of the Jewish people their right to self- determination Ã¢â‚¬Â¦ by claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavorÃ¢â‚¬Â.

This clearly violates freedom of speech and an open exchange of ideas at Canadian universities, and also unfairly and inaccurate labels Israeli Apartheid Week (IAW) as anti-Semitic. In reality, IAW has since 2005 brought together respected activists, academics, journalists and cultural figures from around the world, including Judith Butler, Ronnie Kasrils, Noam Chomsky and Ali Abunimah, among others, to openly discuss ideas related to Israel/Palestine.

IAW provides an educational space for understanding IsraelÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s apartheid policies – as evidenced, for example, through the separate legal systems used by Israelis and Palestinians living in the occupied West Bank or the discriminatory land ownership laws operating inside Israel – and supports the growing campaign for boycott, divestment and sanctions (BDS), which aims to non-violently pressure Israel to respect international law. It is far from the Ã¢â‚¬Å“uniformly well-organized, aggressive [campaign] designed to make the Jewish state and its supporters pariahsÃ¢â‚¬Â the CPCCA report makes it out to be.

The CPCCA also recommended that the Canadian Committee of Foreign Affairs undertake a study on the United Nations Human Rights Council, Ã¢â‚¬Å“particularly regarding its over-emphasis of alleged human rights abuses by Israel, while ignoring flagrant human rights abuses of other member statesÃ¢â‚¬Â.

This clearly demonstrates how the committee has confounded anti-Semitism with criticism of Israel, and is prepared to levy dubious suspicions against UN bodies and tarnish CanadaÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s international standing in the process.

In a statement released on July 8, Thomas Woodley, President of Canadians for Justice and Peace in the Middle East (CJPME), said that the CPCCAÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s recommendations, Ã¢â‚¬Å“if implemented, will inhibit public discussion of IsraelÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s conductÃ¢â‚¬Â.

Ã¢â‚¬Å“CJPME believes that conclusions and recommendations generated by a process in which the same body Ã¢â‚¬â€œ the CPCCA – is prosecutor, jury, and judge, are not credible. Although a few of the witnesses recounted incidents that were indeed indicative of genuine anti-Semitism, many were complaining about merely being exposed to criticism of the IsraelÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s conduct,Ã¢â‚¬Â the CJPME press release stated.

Independent Jewish Voices (IJV) Canada also criticized the committee, stating that Ã¢â‚¬Å“the CPCCAÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s goal is to criminalize criticism of Israel and Zionism, not to hold impartial hearings. Therefore, we oppose the CPCCA as an ideologically biased organization with an agenda that will harm free speech and human rights activity in Canada. We oppose the CPCCAÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s Orwellian distortion of anti-Semitism. It is a danger to both Canadian liberties and to the genuine and necessary fight against anti-Semitism.Ã¢â‚¬Â

Reflection of official Canadian policy

While labeling critics of Israeli policy as anti-Semitic is nothing new, the level at which this accusation is now being used in Canadian discourse must be seen as a reflection of the Canadian governmentÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s official and current policy on the Middle East.

Ã¢â‚¬Å“When Israel, the only country in the world whose very existence is under attack, is consistently and conspicuously singled out for condemnation, I believe we are morally obligated to take a stand.Ã‚Â Demonization, double standards, de-legitimization, the three DÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s, it is the responsibility of us all to stand up to them,Ã¢â‚¬Â Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper said in 2010 at the Ottawa Conference on Combating Anti-Semitism, which was supported by the CPCCA.Ã‚Â Harper added:

Ã¢â‚¬Å“Harnessing disparate anti-American, anti-Semitic and anti-Western ideologies, it targets the Jewish people by targeting the Jewish homeland, Israel, as the source of injustice and conflict in the world and uses, perversely, the language of human rights to do so. We must be relentless in exposing this new anti-Semitism for what it is.Ã¢â‚¬Â
Under Harper, Canada has routinely defended Israeli intransigence and disregard for international law and the human rights of the Palestinian people under its control. In return, trade cooperation and military and security technologies ties have been strengthened between the two states.

In May of this year, it was reported that Harper was adamantly opposed to making any reference to the 1967 borders in a G8 summit statement calling for renewed Israeli-Palestinian negotiations. Far-right Israeli Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman thanked Harper for his position, and stated, Ã¢â‚¬Å“Canada is a true friend of IsraelÃ¢â‚¬Â.

In 2010, Canada announced it would discontinue its financial contributions to the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA), the organization that provides support and resources to approximately 4.7m registered Palestinian refugees in Jordan, Lebanon, Syria and the occupied Palestinian territories, and funnel the money into greater policing and security institutions run by the un-elected and corrupt Palestinian Authority leadership instead.

In January 2009, as the Israeli army continued its disproportionate attack on the besieged civilian population in Gaza that left 1,400 Palestinians dead in the span of three weeks, Canada was the only country out of 47 that voted against a motion at the United Nations Human Rights Council condemning the Israeli violence.
In addition to providing diplomatic cover for Israel, the Canadian government has attacked and cut funding to various non-governmental organizations working on issues related to Israel/Palestine, including Kairos Churches and Alternatives International.

Canadian Minister of Citizenship, Immigration and Multiculturalism Jason Kenney, who led the formation of the Canadian Parliamentary Committee to Combat Anti-Semitism (CPCCA) and is an ex-officio member, has also repeatedly alleged that the Canadian Arab Federation promotes anti-Semitism and hatred. While Kenney never backed up these claims, the Canadian Arab FederationÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s contracts with the government – which helped finance language programs for Toronto-area immigrants (the majority of whom are of Chinese origin) – were not renewed in 2009.

Undermining the fight against real anti-Semitism

Anti-Semitism, like all other forms of racism, is appalling and must be strongly and unequivocally condemned.
But by defining legitimate criticism of Israeli policy and pro-Palestinian activism in Canada as anti-Semitic, the CPCCA is not only threatening free speech and freedom of protest, but it is undermining the fight against real cases of anti-Semitism and weakening the seriousness with which such cases should be dealt.

This is something that Canadians, and people everywhere, should be adamantly against.

___________________

Jillian Kestler-DÃ¢â‚¬â„¢Amours is a Canadian freelance journalist based in Jerusalem. She regularly contributes to The Electronic Intifada, Inter-Press Service and Free Speech Radio News. More of her work can be found at http://jkdamours.com/

The views expressed in this article are the authorÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s own and do not necessarily represent Al JazeeraÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s editorial policy.

Source:
Al Jazeera

Filed Under: 'state' of Israel, Anti-Defamation League (ADL), anti-Semitism, Arthur Topham/ Contributor, B'nai Brith, Babylonian Talmud, Canadian Human Rights Act, Canadian Human Rights Commission, Canadian Human Rights Tribunal, Canadian Identity/Sovereignty, Canadian Jewish Congress, Canadian Politics, Editor's Zone, Freedom of Expression, Freedom of Thought, Gaza, Harry Abrams, Internet Freedom, Israeli Terrorism, Jewish Banking Cartel, Jewish Holocaust Industry, Jewish Lobby, Jewish Media Monopoly, Jewish Porn Industry, Jews, Jews Behind Bolshevik Revolution, Judaism, Law & Justice, Mainstream Mindcontrol Media (M3), Middle East, New World Order, Noam Chomsky, Palestine, Political Prisoners, Political Zionism, Secrets of the Federal Reserve/Eustace Mullins, The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, U.S. 'War' on Terror, United Nations, Zionist Atrocities, Zionist Jews in Russia

The Morgenthau Plan for Israel by J.B. Campbell

June 5, 2011 by admin

VTlogo
JBCampLogo

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/06/02/the-morgenthau-plan-for-israel/

IsMustPer

Israel Must Perish!Ã‚Â ItÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s a Cancer Eating Up the World

by J.B. Campbell

Thursday, June 2nd, 2011

The Morgenthau Plan for Germany was presented to Franklin Roosevelt by his treasury secretary, Henry Morgenthau, Jr. George Patton said in his diary that the idea was presented to Morgenthau by Dwight D. Eisenhower during a visit to PattonÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s camp in France a few weeks after D-Day. Harry Dexter White (Weit), a Soviet agent in MorgenthauÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s Treasury Department whose parents were Lithuanian Jews, designed our post-war genocide of the Germans based on a book written in 1941 by Theodore N. Kaufman entitled Ã¢â‚¬Å“Germany Must Perish!Ã¢â‚¬Â

The Morgenthau Plan was the reason that millions of Germans, both prisoners of war and German civilians, were slaughtered on EisenhowerÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s orders in the months and years following World War II. It was the reason that German industry was dismantled and taken to the Soviet Union. It was the reason that German children and adults were put through Jewish brainwashing to hate themselves and obey the Jews. It was all in the plan, all based on KaufmanÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s vicious little book.

I donÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t like to criticize Jews. It gives them too much power over our minds, by making us think about them, which is what they crave. It must however be done occasionally. We should therefore let them do the work.

Roy Arthur Topham up in Canada has come up with a truly brilliant way to do this. He has simply taken KaufmanÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s book and replaced Ã¢â‚¬Å“GermanyÃ¢â‚¬Â with Ã¢â‚¬Å“Israel,Ã¢â‚¬Â Ã¢â‚¬Å“GermansÃ¢â‚¬Â with Ã¢â‚¬Å“JewsÃ¢â‚¬Â and Ã¢â‚¬Å“NaziÃ¢â‚¬Â with Ã¢â‚¬Å“Zionist.Ã¢â‚¬Â In so doing, he has given us the weapon we need, a means of describing the menace of Israel as I myself could never do, either for lack of writing ability or inclination or both.

Israel and Judaism are deserving of our hate but it is not in our nature to do this properly. This is easily proven by reading KaufmanÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s words. He knew how to hate and how to write about it. It is so odd that his lies about Germany become the truth about Israel. So odd but so fitting.

Israel must perish. It is a cancer eating up the world. Cancer is killing so many people because the ones we have trusted to fight cancer have deliberately made the disease more widespread by using cancer-causing but lucrative quack remedies such as radiation and poisonous chemicals. Surgery often spreads cancer but sometimes thereÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s no other way to get rid of a tumor. That is what is called for in the case of Israel. This malignant tumor must be cut out. Or starved out, the way Germany was starved out.

MorganthauRoos
Henry Morgenthau and President Roosevelt

Of course, there is no political will in DC to do this. We need to get rid of the institution that represents only the interests of Israel, the US Congress. This body should be devoted to American interests, mainly in the creation of debt-free currency. But it certainly mustnÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t be devoted to the military superiority of Israel, as is currently and traditionally the case.

What would have been the reaction of US Jews if it were revealed that all congressional candidates had to sign a pledge to maintain the military superiority of Nazi Germany in the 1930s and Ã¢â‚¬Ëœ40s? Would we ever have heard the end of it?

So here is Roy Arthur TophamÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s conversion of anti-German lies into anti-Jewish truth. What can Jewish critics say? The language is Jewish, written by someone with a blinding hatred of the German people, without doubt the finest and most creative and decent people on earth. It is only fair that the language is turned back on those who supported the mass murder of the Germans, a crime against humanity based on this very book.

The Germans have been libeled as Ã¢â‚¬Å“HitlerÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s willing executioners,Ã¢â‚¬Â for going along with the German extermination of Jews, something we now know neither happened nor was attempted nor even contemplated. But something that we do know is happening is the ethnic cleansing of the Palestinians by Israel, something generally supported by Jews everywhere. Some Jews may say they do not support this but how many Jews say that Jews must get out of Palestine, which is the only solution to this crime against humanity? IÃ¢â‚¬â„¢ve never heard one say it. Only Helen Thomas said it.

Therefore, we can say that Jews everywhere are Ã¢â‚¬Å“NetanyahuÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s willing executioners.Ã¢â‚¬Â

Here is how Theodore N. Kaufman prescribed the treatment of such a bloodthirsty people, with the names changed to attack the guilty:

Arthur Topham has done something brilliant yet simple that it makes people such as myself ask, Ã¢â‚¬Å“Why didnÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t I think of that?Ã¢â‚¬Â

What EisenhowerÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s army killers did to the Germans after World War II was so horrific and dreadful that you cannot find films of it on YouTube or Google, the owners of which naturally donÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t want us to see what their synagogue brethren did to a prostrate and helpless people. If we could see what was done to Germans we could better grasp the same crimes being committed today against Arabs, by the same people.

What can anyone say about this idea? That it is hateful? Consider the source. This is just the Morgenthau Plan for Israel. ItÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s only fair.Ã‚Â What follows is an excerpt from Arthur TophamÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s conversion of KaufmanÃ¢â‚¬Â¦.

ISRAEL MUST PERISH! The Book that the Jews Fear

By Arthur Topham

May 27, 2011

AuthorÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s Preface:

What is contained herein is but a synopsis and partial review of the verbatim text of an actual book first published in the USA back in early 1941 when America was still a neutral country. That book, Germany Must Perish! was written by a Jewish writer by the name of Theodore N. Kaufman. Its exact proposals are those contained herein.

It is assumed that the reader will already be fully cognizant of the Zionist agenda for global governance that is a given in todayÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s political reality, especially within the alternative media and on the Internet where Zionist Ã¢â‚¬Å“hateÃ¢â‚¬Â laws are still not fully in place to restrict the natural flow of ideas and opinions that proceed from historical research and experience.

In 1941 KaufmanÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s book was a brilliant piece of Zionist Jew propaganda designed to stir up anti-German hatred in America. Some say that it formed the basis of the infamous Ã¢â‚¬Å“Morgenthau PlanÃ¢â‚¬Â that was later signed in Quebec, Canada by President Roosevelt and Prime Minister Churchill; one designed to dismember Germany after its defeat and reduce it to the status of Ã¢â‚¬Å“a goat pasture.Ã¢â‚¬Â It was probably remains to this day the foremost example of hate literature ever to have been published and dispensed to the general public.

As the reader will surmise from viewing the image of the back page of KaufmanÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s book some of AmericaÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s most prestigious newspapers and magazines were in full support of the objectives set down in this classic book of Jewish hate literature. Again, the reader is cautioned to bear in mind that I have changed the word Ã¢â‚¬Å“NaziÃ¢â‚¬Â to Ã¢â‚¬Å“JewÃ¢â‚¬Â in the quote from the Philadelphia Record as I have changed all the other words Ã¢â‚¬Å“GermanÃ¢â‚¬Â and Ã¢â‚¬Å“NaziÃ¢â‚¬Â to Ã¢â‚¬Å“JewÃ¢â‚¬Â and Ã¢â‚¬Å“Zionist,Ã¢â‚¬Â etc.

The striking thing about the vileness of the text is how, today, it seems to roll off the mindÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s tongue as if it were as truthful and factual as the rising sun. As such I firmly believe that all of what the Zionist Jews write about others is actually but a reflection of their own inner, perverse, dislocated self. By projecting outward on to others their innate paranoid and deep-seated hatred for the rest of the world theyÃ¢â‚¬â„¢re able to meet the requirements of the Israeli stateÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s motto which reads, Ã¢â‚¬Å“By Way of Deception Though Shalt Cause WarÃ¢â‚¬Â and feel a sense of superiority and self-righteousness in doing so.

I would humbly ask the reader to be aware of these features as they read both the text and the context in which it was first written. I have, as the saying goes, only changed the names to protect the innocent. As for any further extrapolation I will leave that up to the reader.

________________

In ISRAEL MUST PERISH! The Book that the Jews Fear, beginning with the Table of Contents page Topham makes this dramatic initial statementÃ‚Â Ã¢â‚¬Å“This dynamic volume outlines a comprehensive plan for the extinction of the Jewish nation and the total eradication from the earth, of all her people.Ã¢â‚¬ÂÃ‚Â How do you like those apples so far? Talk about cutting to the chase!

From Chapter One: About This Book

Ã¢â‚¬Å“TodayÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s wars are not wars against Netanyahu. Nor are they wars against the ZionistsÃ¢â‚¬Â¦ Netanyahu is no more to be blamed for these Israeli wars than was Sharon for the last one. Nor Begin before. These men did not originate or wage IsraelÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s wars against the world. They were merely the mirrors reflecting centuries-old inbred lust of the Jewish nation for conquest and mass murder.Ã‚Â These wars are being waged by the Jewish people. It is they who are responsible. It is they who must be made to pay for the wars. Ã¢â‚¬Â¦This time Israel has forced a TOTAL WAR upon the world.Ã‚Â Ã‚Â As a result, she must be prepared to pay a TOTAL PENALTY.

And there is one, and only one, such Total Penalty, Israel must perish forever!Ã‚Â In fact Ã¢â‚¬â€œ not in fancy!Ã¢â‚¬Â

————–

Filed Under: 'state' of Israel, Dwight D. Eisenhower, Editor's Zone, George Patton, Germany, Harry Dexter White, Henry Morgenthau, JB Campbell, Jewish Holocaust Industry, Jewish Lobby, Jewish Media Monopoly, Jews, Jews Behind Bolshevik Revolution, Jr., Morgenthau Plan, Palestine, Political Prisoners, Political Zionism, Revisionism, The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, Theodore N. Kaufman, VeteransToday

Seeing is Disbelieving by Edgar J. Steele

June 2, 2011 by admin

EdgarJSteele
Edgar J. Steele – Framed by the ADL for his anti-

Zionist views

_______________________________________________________

(Preface by Cyndi Steele.Ã‚Â June 1, 2011)

As hard as they may try, they are not going to silence Edgar J. Steele

Yes, our hopes for justice might have been crushed, temporarily, with the tragedy of my husbandÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s, Edgar J. Steele, unjust conviction. For his children and I it, has been devastating. In a time when the government has proven itself corrupt, especially in targeting and attacking the innocent who are outspoken, now it touts as a victory, silencing this innocent man who stood up for Freedom of Speech in our once great nation; a nation that is now known as Ã¢â‚¬Å“Amerika: the land of a captive people and home to government cowardsÃ¢â‚¬Â.

While serious illnesses slowed him down for six months of 2010, the government took him out of circulation for another year, he, and all of those who helped and contributed to his defense, fought valiantly for his freedom. Ed sadly chose to do it their way; staying quiet and letting the attorneys work the case in the manner they insisted was best for his acquittal. Well, we all have witnessed where that has gotten himÃ¢â‚¬Â¦.JAIL and MORE JAIL.

Now, this time, Ed is going to be doing it his way! LOUD and as OUTSPOKEN as he possible can be! Just as we have known him to be in his past writings. So despite them keeping him behind cell walls, he is writing, with hopes of having enough material for a book or two. Meanwhile, he has asked that portions of his work be shared with everyone so that his voice can start to be heard, again.
Below is Edgar J SteeleÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s first writing since his arrest last year on June 11, 2010

========================================

Seeing is Disbelieving
by Edgar J. Steele

There are things in life that defy belief. Seeing them often is enough to set one on a path toward seeing unbelievable things at every turn. Seeing is disbelieving? HmmÃ¢â‚¬Â¦

The Red Queen of Alice in Wonderland Fame remarked that she often believed in impossible things; as many as six of them, all just before lunch, too.

A great many more people now are willing to disbelieve in the inherent justice of the American Justice System. They watched a jury in Boise convict me of four Federal felonies.

Sigh. Where do I begin?

You Could Be Next

This story will take some time and require several installments. If you have yet to hear anything about it, you will not believe it. You may not believe it, anyway. I do, however. I am living it. All too easily, you could be next.

I was convicted of hatching a plot to kill my wife, in which I allegedly hired an oafish Idaho handyman as a hit man. Already, something may not sound quite right to you.

A Case in Search of a Motive

Why did I want Cyndi, my wife of 25 years dead? I never have quite heard a reason that makes sense. First, Cyndi was told by the FBI that theÃ‚Â motive was life insurance, but then they learned that both of us cancelled our policies years ago. Then, the FBI told her that the motive was my jealousy over her (fictitious) boyfriend. Cyndi quashed that by demanding that the FBI produce photos they said they had; of course, there were none.

Finally, the government settled upon a case I was investigating as motive, because I had communicated with a great many young Ukrainian women (with CyndiÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s consent and even, assistance) to determine if the Russian Bride business really was a human trafficking scam. First, as part of that case I briefly handled, then simply because I found the subject fascinating and worthy of writing a book about it.

Two more novel motives were presented at trial: (1) I was after our car Ã¢â‚¬Å“uninsured motoristÃ¢â‚¬Â insurance, though I was a lawyer and would have known full well that death by pipe bomb is not Ã¢â‚¬Å“accidental,Ã¢â‚¬Â so that no insurance ever could be paid. (2) divorce from Cyndi would be too expensive. Yet, the prosecutor failed to tell the jury that I had signed all my assets over to Cyndi. Cyndi was part of every aspect of my life, even my communications overseas to determine how the bartered bride business really worked, so I could write a book exposing the fraud to beÃ‚Â entitled Ã¢â‚¬Å“Love and Other Four Letter WordsÃ¢â‚¬Â (subtitled Ã¢â‚¬Å“The Invasion of Planet Earth by Teenage Russian Mail-Order Brides from Cyberspace).

You see, I happen to love Cyndi. I know Ã¢â‚¬â€œ that just isnÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t fashionable in this day of throw-away relationships, but it is true.

I often have written of how lucky I have been to have had her. About the terrific kids we have. About how my family life serves to steady my universe. All true, even now, as I write these words from a jail cell in Northern Idaho while awaiting sentencing and endeavoring, as best I can, to get a new trial.

My Love Story

Let me try, first, to tell you of my love for Cyndi. She is my mate, pal, helper, lover, buddy, partner, mother of our kidsÃ¢â‚¬Â¦ my first and last wifeÃ¢â‚¬Â¦my best friend. The love of my life. She is so much better than I deserve. I could go on.

There is a reason for this paen to my blushing bride, of course. To see that the Emperor of my story has no clothes, you must first get, on a visceral level, as do my closest friends, just how ludicrous it would be for me to want my wife dead.

I recall the moment I first laid eyes on Cyndi and the spontaneous burst of surprise and pleasure that crossed her face just before she cast her eyes down and first smiled for me that impish little grin of hers that I love so much. In less than two minutes, I was swept away, though I did my manly best to seem inaffected. It was love at first sight and, 27 years later, my heart still leaps up every time I catch sight of her again.

I could, and should, go on like this for a long time, but please know that I still see Cyndi as my one and only soulmate. There is much, much more to this story, though, and I have to give you at least an overview in this first installment.

My Way

At my lawyers request, I have kept silent (though, not silent enough) about my case. I have made no public statements until today and have yet to speak with anybody from any media outlet. I bit my tongue during my recent trial and, against my better judgment, agreed not to take the stand to testify in my own behalf. Fat lot of good all that has done me!

No more. I did it my lawyerÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s way and now, at age 65, I am facing a mandatory minimum sentence of 30 years, with 70 years a very real possibility. ObviouslyÃ‚Â¸ any sentence over 10 years is redundant to my life expectancy, especially in view of the medical problems I have seen in recent years (yet another lengthy, though relevant, story for another day).

Now we are going to do it my way, which likely will involve a good deal of sound and fury.

All My Trials

First up: Motion for a New Trial which my Federal judge will reject in summary fashion. I will have to rely on an appeal to get that new trial. It should be a laydown appeal, though, because this judge repeatedly committed reversible error (more than one story for other days).

We wrecked a sizable legal defense fund (the thanks for which will take more future stories than you will want to read) during the first trial, so I very possibly will have to represent myself at retrial. Spare me the jokes Ã¢â‚¬â€œ all lawyers are fools (elseÃ‚Â¸ we wouldnÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t even be lawyers, of course).

Lessee now, where were we? Oh, yes. What really happened? HereÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s the executive summary:

The Idahun Hit Man

Larry the Idahun handyman/builder/junk hauler whose cousinÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s name is Daryl, I swear (though I do not yet know if the cousin has one or moreÃ‚Â brothers also named Daryl), worked off and on for us for years. Larry knew we had hidey-holes here and there on the property, because he built some of them for us. Larry stumbled across one of three silver stashes in an outbuilding and then he searched and found two others. All told, Larry stole $45,000 in silver bullion from us at the then price of $18 per ounce.

Knowing I/we would discover the theft, Larry apparently decided that I/we had to go, so he set out to kill me/us with car pipe bombs. Like Wiley Coyote, Larry must shop at Acme, because neither of the two bombs that he then placed on the two cars I drive (one of which Cyndi drove about half the time) went off.

Larry says he removed the bomb attached to one car and then believed the other Ã¢â‚¬Å“fell offÃ¢â‚¬Â when his cousin Daryl failed to see it after being told to look.

There is an alternate theory that explains the car pipebomb as having been emplaced after I was arrested, but the foregoing seems the most likely scenario.

It is undisputed that Larry sold silver on three different occasions (remember, he stole three of our hidden stashes) Ã¢â‚¬â€œ he produced receipts for those sales (totaling just a few thousand dollars) during his testimony at my trial. Larry claimed I gave the silver to him as part of my $10,000 payment to him for killing my precious Cyndi. Larry did actually admit that I didnÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t give the silver to him (he took it from one of the three hidey-holes, he said).

Making a Federal Case Out of It

Why did Larry then go to the FBI and fess up to his part in this sordid affair? In exchange for full immunity, of course. He still had to get me out of the way before I discovered his theft. I was beginning to mend from the four surgeries I had had in six months and I was starting to get out of the house.

Larry and I had been talking a lot during those six months, because he was helping us out with many things, including feeding our horses twice a day whenever Cyndi was out of town tending to her very ill mother who lives alone. I explained my difficulties with the ADL, the Russian Mafia, the FBI and others. All he needed to do was make one phone call in order to be conscripted into helping get me out of the way, which isÃ‚Â just what he wanted.

Just a Coincidence

The ADLÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s internet site hit piece on me was quoted in the very first court filing Ã¢â‚¬â€œ coincidence? The FBI is alleged by us conspiracy theorists to be in bed with, if not controlled by, the ADL. More coincidence? Why did Larry go to the FBI rather than the local Sheriff or state authorities, like most of us would do? Yet still more coincidence? Larry said that he travelled nine hours to Oregon to ensure the bomb fell off the car that Cyndi then was driving, but he couldnÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t be bothered to take the time to look for himself. Really? Of course, it is just coincidence that this interstate trip is the only thing that gave jurisdiction to the FBIÃ¢â‚¬Â¦isnÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t it? Do you still believe in coincidence? I donÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t.

Ok, you may be saying Ã¢â‚¬â€œ WhatÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s the big deal? My word against the IdahunÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s, so I should be exonerated without a fight. That would be true if not for those pesky audio recordings that Larry and the FBI claim memorialize my hiring Larry the Idahun hit man. But letÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s save that story for the next installment in this epic affair, Ã¢â‚¬Å“Sex, Lies and Audiotapes.Ã¢â‚¬Â

There is so much more to come in this story: Russian Mafia intrigue, teenage beauty queens, official (and unofficial) corruption, mail-order brides, Hannibal Edgar, the Tao of Ed, private jets, TahitiÃ¢â‚¬Â¦..and more, believe it or not. Remember, seeing is disbelieving.

With a little help from my friends and my lovely Cyndi, who resolutely has stood by me throughout this ordeal, I will get this and future installments out to my list and posted on my website , as well as others. Bear with us, please.

I was finally seeing some of the mail sent to me in recent months. However, IÃ¢â‚¬â„¢m once again being moved and at this moment, no one knows where. So please visit www.free-edgar-steele.com for updates on where to send mail.

-ed

Forward as you wish.Ã‚Â Permission is granted to circulate this article among private individuals and groups, post on all Internet sites and publish in full in all not-for-profit publications.Ã‚Â Contact author for all other rights, which are reserved.

Filed Under: Anti-Defamation League (ADL), Edgar J. Steele, Editor's Zone, Jews, Political Zionism, The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion

Defanging the serpent: Final Solution for World Peace by Ian V. Macdonald

June 1, 2011 by admin

Writer’s prefatorial comments: The erasure of Israel is the obvious prerequisite for restoration of a stable world peace but for some reason politicians and journalists stay away from the subject, or at least are never quoted.Ã‚Â Perhaps because they know they would face permanent unemployment, or worse, should they attempt even mention of the idea, let alone support it. Publication of this letter might stiffen a few journalistic backbones in cases where the individuals choose early retirement from the profession, but unfortunately it will not be published.Ã‚Â I.V.

**************************************

May 31, 2011

Editor
GUARDIAN WEEKLY
London

Dear Sir,

Final Solution for World Peace

Even the very thought has been long taboo among Western politicians and editors, but with the growing determination of Israel to expand its sphere of influence in the Middle East and North Africa and her ability to coerce the United States and even peace-keeping Canada into serving her sinister military and political goals, it is not too soon to recognize that the establishment of a sovereign Jewish state was a miscalculation with potentially-apocalyptic consequences that must be corrected, with the use of force, if necessary..

The Israeli Prime Minister has made it clear that “negotiations” for an equitable division of Palestine will never succeed. Perhaps an illusory modus vivendi will be achieved but the problem of an neurotic, nuclear power surrounded by perceived enemies nevertheless would persist and intensify with further Zionist provocations.

The crux of the problem, however, is neither borders nor militant Zionism as such, but rather the toxic subversion that a sovereign Jewish state has been able to achieve of the leadership of the Western democracies which in several nations has reached the point of a veritable coup d’etat . The American President and Congress openly express their unswerving allegiance and subservience to the State of Israel, as does the Canadian Prime Minister, although virtually all their respective patriotic constituents, in tune with the rest of humanity, look upon the criminal apartheid nation with abhorrence, at best.

This stealthy conquest-from-within of America has enabled the Zionists to dictate U.S. foreign, military, financial and immigration policy and thus denationalize and destabilize the country, furthering their goal of a World Government under their control.Ã‚Â The takeover has been financed partly by earnings from international banking and other forms of organized crime made possible by the existence of a safe-haven where both the criminals and their spoils can be protected from retribution and retrieval. No other criminal community in the world has this advantage. It is invaluable in laundering the immense profits from international drug dealing, arms sales, major fraud, prostitution, embezzlement, theft, smuggling and other wrongdoing, all on a grand scale.Ã‚Â Ironically, much of the laundered money is returned to its country of origin, further corrupting the political process and dispossessing the original victims (recently, $4 billion was invested by Israelis in one year in Montreal real estate alone, a tiny fraction of the total).

Israel is a powerful state. It was built on deceit, bribery, terror and the venality and treachery of British and American politicians, then nurtured on the no less problematical Legend of the Six Million, a gargantuan public relations project contrived to sway the sympathy of the masses. In recent years Israel’s plummeting popularity gained a boost from the heavily-promoted spectre of “terrorism”. This support is now evaporating with the growing, well-founded, suspicion that the demolition of the WTC was a Mossad false flag operation to justify the invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan, among other sordid ventures.Ã‚Â If Israel should perish tomorrow, there would be few tears, even among Diaspora Jews, many of whom must view each new Zionist atrocity and exposed subterfuge as a threat to their privileged existence in host countries.

The dismantling of Israel may seem a daunting challenge on its face but deepening worldwide disapprobation and fear of the prospect of waging another World War on Zion’s behalf could easily foster the birth of a massive grass-roots movement that no nominally-democratic government could withstand, no matter how desperate the efforts of the Zionist media and Jewish lobbyistsÃ‚Â To ensure Israeli compliance, Iraq-style total sanctions could be deployed, rendering the vulnerable rogue-state quickly dysfunctional. Civil disturbances would arise, justifying UN -style intervention to neutralize the country’s military establishment and nuclear capabilities. Armed resistance would not be an option.

In the aftermath, long-overdue War Crimes trials could be held, political prisoners freed, generous compensation dispensed to victims from Israel’s bursting coffers, and a new regime installed pending free elections in a Jewish-Palestinian federation with Jerusalem declared an International Holy City, as originally planned.Ã‚Â With Israel gone, the world, purged of its most diabolically-avaricious, paranoid, duplicitous, corrupting, war-mongering, racist enemy, could rest happily in peace and security with the prospect of representative government, freed from the grip of a foreign lobby. There would be time then to devise an appropriate fate for the domestic politicians and their Zionist paymasters, without whose contemptible treason Israel never would have been born..

Yours faithfully,

Ian V. Macdonald
455 Wilbrod Street
Ottawa ON Canada K1N 6M7
613 241 5389
(former RCAF, RNFAA, Canadian Foreign Service ret.)
Email: IanVMacdonald@aol.com

Filed Under: 'state' of Israel, Babylonian Talmud, Editor's Zone, Ian V. Macdonald, Jewish Holocaust Industry, Jewish Lobby, Jews, Judaism, Letters, New World Order, Palestine, Political Zionism, The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, Zionist Atrocities

ISRAEL MUST PERISH! The Book that the Jews Fear By Arthur Topham

May 28, 2011 by admin

IsraelMustPerishFrnt
IsMustPerishBk

ISRAEL MUST PERISH! The Book that the Jews Fear
By Arthur Topham

May 27, 2011

Author’s Preface:

What is contained herein is but a synopsis and partial review of the verbatim text of an actual book first published in the USA back in early 1941 when America was still a neutral country. That book, Germany Must Perish! was written by a Jewish writer by the name of Theodore N. Kaufman. Its exact proposals are those contained herein.

It is assumed that the reader will already be fully cognizant of the Zionist agenda for global governance that is a given in today’s political reality, especially within the alternative media and on the Internet where Zionist “hate” laws are still not fully in place to restrict the natural flow of ideas and opinions that proceed from historical research and experience.

In 1941 Kaufman’s book was a brilliant piece of Zionist Jew propaganda designed to stir up anti-German hatred in America. Some say that it formed the basis of the infamous “Morgenthau Plan” that was later signed in Quebec, Canada by President Roosevelt and Prime Minister Churchill; one designed to dismember Germany after its defeat and reduce it to the status of “a goat pasture.” It was probably remains to this day the foremost example of hate literature ever to have been published and dispensed to the general public.

As the reader will surmise from viewing the image of the back page of Kaufman’s book some of America’s most prestigious newspapers and magazines were in full support of the objectives set down in this classic book of Jewish hate literature. Again, the reader is cautioned to bear in mind that I have changed the word “Nazi” to “Jew” in the quote from the Philadelphia Record as I have changed all the other words “German” and “Nazi” to “Jew” and “Zionist,” etc.

The striking thing about the vileness of the text is how, today, it seems to roll off the mind’s tongue as if it were as truthful and factual as the rising sun. As such I firmly believe that all of what the Zionist Jews write about others is actually but a reflection of their own inner, perverse, dislocated self. By projecting outward on to others their innate paranoid and deep-seated hatred for the rest of the world they’re able to meet the requirements of the Israeli state’s motto which reads, “By Way of Deception Though Shalt Cause War” and feel a sense of superiority and self-righteousness in doing so.

________________

ISRAEL MUST PERISH! The Book that the Jews Fear By Roy Arthur Topham

Beginning with the Table of Contents page Topham makes this dramatic initial statement:

“This dynamic volume outlines a comprehensive plan for the extinction of the Jewish nation and the total eradication from the earth, of all her people.”

How do you like those apples so far? Talk about cutting to the chase!

from Chapter One: About This Book

“Today’s wars are not wars against Netanyahu.

Nor are they wars against the Zionists…

Netanyahu is no more to be blamed for these Israeli wars than was Sharon for the last one. NorÃ‚Â Begin before. These men did not originate or wage Israel’s wars against the world. They were merely the mirrors reflecting centuries-old inbred lust of the Jewish nation for conquest and mass murder.

These wars are being waged by the Jewish people. It is they who are responsible. It is they who must be made to pay for the wars.

…This time Israel has forced a TOTAL WAR upon the world.

As a result, she must be prepared to pay a TOTAL PENALTY.

And there is one, and only one, such Total Penalty:

Israel must perish forever!

In fact Ã¢â‚¬â€œ not in fancy!”

*******************

“For quite patently, to fight once more in democratic defense against Israel with any goal in view save that country’s extinction constitutes, even though it lose the war, a Jewish victory. To fight, to win, and not this time to end Jewish Zionism forever by exterminating completely those people who spread its doctrine is to herald the outbreak of another Jewish war within a generation.”

When this day of reckoning with Israel comes, as come it will, there will be only one obvious answer. No statesman or politician or leader responsible for post-war settlements will have the right to indulge in the personal luxury of false sentiment and specious sanctimony and declare that Israel, misled by her leaders, shall deserve the right of resurrection!

… the beast that is Israel shall never roam the earth again!

It is a definite obligation which the world owes to those who struggled and died against the Jews…to make certain that the vicious fangs of the Jewish serpent shall never strike again. And since the venom of those fangs derives its fatal poison not from within the body, but from the war-soul of the Jews, nothing else would assure humanity safety and security but that that war-soul be forever expunged, and the diseased carcass which harbors it be forever removed from this world. There is no longer any alternative:

Israel Must Perish!

… And so it is with the people of Israel. They may respond for a while to civilizing forces; they may seemingly adopt the superficial mannerisms and exterior behaviorisms of civilized peoples but all the while there remains ever present within them that war-soul which eventually drives them, as it drives the tiger, to kill. And no amount of conditioning, or reasoning, or civilizing Ã¢â‚¬â€œ past, present or future Ã¢â‚¬â€œ will ever be able to change this basic nature. For if no impress has been made upon this war-soul over the period of some two thousand years is it to be expected that of a sudden, on the morrow, this miracle will occur?

This analogous linking of the people of Israel with a savage beast is no vulgar comparison. I feel no more personal hatred for these people than I might feel for a herd of wild animals or a cluster of poisonous reptiles. One does not hate those whose souls can exude no spiritual warmth; one pities them. If the Jewish people wish to live by themselves, in darkness, it would be strictly their own affair. But when they make constant attempts to enshroud the souls of other people in those fetid wrappings which cloak their own, it becomes time to remove them from the realm of civilized mankind among which they can have no place or right to existence.

We need not condemn the Jews. They stand self-condemned. For it suffices us to read and hear those words written and spoken only by Jews; to observe deeds performed solely by Jews; to endure sufferings and dislocations caused solely by the Jewish people in pursuit of their megalomaniacal ideals and daemonic aspirations to realize that it is the Jews themselves who decree, almost demand, their ostracism from their fellow man. They have lost the wish to be human beings. They are but beasts; they must be dealt with as such.

This is an objective viewpoint, carefully considered and factually sustained. It is the viewpoint taken of them in this book.

War must be fought … with penalties infinitely more frightful and hazardous than war itself.

This book sincerely believes that it has found such a penalty; and by its imposition upon the people of Israel, this book believes that not only would a great scourge be removed from the world, but a great good born to it.”

from Chapter Two: Background of Jewish Zionism

“Jews are an execrable people! They think and dream of nothing but chicanery. Their great joy consists in fault-finding, shrieking and threats. They brandish arms which are like barbed clubs; from their mouths instead of ordinary human speech, issue the rumbling of artillery and the clash of steel; their life is one of perpetual explosion. The Jew does not live on the heights; he avoids light, and from his hiding place he picks to pieces treaties, exercises his malign influence on newspaper articles, pores over maps, measures angles, and traces with gloating eagerness the lines of frontiers. To love their country is for them to despise, flout and insult every other country. They are capable of little else but cheating and lying, even to themselves. They meddle in everyone else’s affairs, poking their nose into matters that do not concern them, criticizing everything, bossing everything, lowering and distorting everything. What a pity that twenty-three centuries after Socrates and Plato, two thousand years after Christ, the voice of men like these should still be heard in the world, worse still that they should be listened to, and worst of all that any one should believe them! Country for them is an isolated organism and they admit it is possible for them to live and breathe in an atmosphere of haughty contempt for their neighbors. They conceive their country as a permanent element of dissolution like a devouring and insatiable monster, a beast of prey, whose one function is to plunder. All that it does not possess it has been robbed of. The universe belongs to it by right. Whoever attempts to escape from its tyranny is a rebel. This jingo country, this bloodthirsty fetish of which they are the champions, they endow, with the capriciousness of potentates, when it suits their purpose, with every marvelous and charming attribute. Whoever does not at once agree with their extravagances is a barbarian. You must love their country in full armor, with dervish-like celebrations and howls, eyes shut and body trembling with ecstasy; a deaf ear must be turned to the rest of the world on its failings. Everything that is not Jewish must be hated. Hate is sacred. Love and hate are in connection with your country two terms proceeding from one condition of mind. For them Industrial progress is not a happy sign of national prosperity but a means of domination. Geography is not the science of the earth, but a mere revelation of the boundaries between which are elaborated strategical schemes of conquest. Every neighbor is of necessity a jealous one, and the enemy who is vigilant is jealous too. The world is populated by hyenas crouching on the plots of earth from which they ought to be dislodged.

The Jew has decided that his race has been elected by God to order the modern world. Anyone who resists him will be an arrogant usurper, who ought to be crushed. The Jew professes to want peace, but it must be his own sort of peace, after the pattern of the Persian satrap’s who, out of love for peace and concord, throws everyone to the lions who dares dispute him. His voice is raucous and resounding; he does not argue but makes sweeping assertions and lays down the law. At the first sign of resistance he grows crimson in the face, and has recourse to thunder and lightning. He holds forth on the authority of a sacred categorical imperative which stands in the stead of truth and order; he respects nothing and no one. Should he find himself confronted by the law, he says that it needs reforming. Ministers are mere clerks to be used as pawns in his manoeuvering. He is exacting and cantankerous; whoever undertakes to shout with him never shouts loud enough. To give in to him means becoming enlisted as his civil agent. He is an agitator and swashbuckler. He dips his pen in gall and he sets in motion with his antics the marionettes which appeal to the nation and may come to conquer it. The fundamental superiority of the Jewish race, the necessity of expanding Jewish prestige in all quarters of the globe, of protecting the Jew wherever he may be found, no matter what he may be, because he bears within him a residuum of the race; that is what the educators of youth coming down the years in disciplined array like battalions crossing the manoeuver fields, have never ceased to drum into the popular understanding and the flame of victory rising to the sky will be the signal for it to boil over.

…Time cannot change the infernal breed, whatever its label. Time merely enlarges the field in which the Jew can, with ever-increasing intensity and thoroughness, practice those monstrous acts which his fevered, war-intoxicated brain dictates, and his vile instincts and barbaric, savage soul prompts. If today the urge of his war-soul can prompt the Jew to murder innocent hostages imagine, if you can, how that same soul will express itself through the thousandfold-more-fanatic Jew of tomorrow?

…Make no mistake about it; world-dominion is not a mirage to the Jew; it never was, and so long as Israel exists as a nation, it never will be. A belief to the contrary, if too-long sustained, may well result in the world’s enslavement by the Jew.

As fantastic and as cyclonic as Zionist “accomplishments” might seem, it is still more fantastic to note as a fact that in the entire annals of history no doctrine ever existed which has all its major beliefs so clearly defined, its methods so concisely detailed, and its aims so vividly, comprehensively, and boldly stated beforehand. It is in every respect a deliberate, ruthlessly calculated plot to rule the world or, failing that, to annihilate it! And so long as the Jewish nation exists it intends, in one form or another, now or later, to bring about just such a catastrophe.

…The poisonous wine of destruction has long before been distilled; Netanyahu is merely the agent decanting the poisonous fluid from its bottle, which is the Jewish war-soul, into the jug that is world humanity. In detailing those ingredients which combine to constitute the toxic formula of Jewish Zionism the author shall quote, wherever confirmation of his statements may be deemed advisable, principally from Jewish sources. For after all no one can explain the Jew so well as he himself. He has made no secret of his character, his ambitions and his intentions. By his acts he has himself bared his heart and soul; by his words, by his own hand he will someday come to dig his own grave.

It is not to be wondered at that the nations of the Western world regard the avowed program of the Zionist Jew for world conquest and dominion with a great deal of amazement and incredulity. For such an idea is entirely alien to those basic principles and instincts of the western civilization which, painfully and gradually, arose out of the chaos of the past thousands of years. Such civilized nations regard individual rights, the sacredness of human life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness as the virtues of mankind and itself, the individual States, as guarantor of those rights. And though, at one time or another during their existence nations may have sought political and economic adjustments, even territorial aggrandizement through force of arms, it must be noted that no Western nation has ever made such a religion of war, such idolatry of armaments, and such a cult of mass murder and destruction as has Israel and her peoples.

According to her own writers, teachers and statesmen Israel has but one great reason for existing; that of achieving world-dominion! Since that is its highest aim, therefore, Israel constantly claims that it has every right to make free and liberal use of chicanery, deceit, intolerance, lust, persecution and oppression, in order to achieve that goal. Consequently such a perverted nation, such a State of human negation, views its vice as being the only true virtue in life, whereas to the Jews the virtues as they are known and may be practiced by the rest of the world are merely vices due to the latter’s decay and degeneration! As though there exists anywhere in the world a nation which can boast of degeneration in the same degree as Israel!

The primary reason which stirs Jewish lust for world dominion was best summarized by a Jewish professor who declared that since Israel will never be able to understand the world, the latter must be conquered and reformed so that it will be able to conform to Jewish thought!

It is just such mass megalomania, crass egoism and intellectual aberrancy which stirred the demented brain of the Jew of yesterday to foment his wars; which animates the insane Zionist today in continuing those wars and which will, if the schizophrenic Ashkenazim continue to exist, direct the policies and actions of any party in control of Israel in the future. For, to reiterate, the Jewish idea of world-dominion and enslavement of its peoples is no political belief: it is a fierce and burning gospel of hate and intolerance, of murder and destruction and the unloosing of a sadistic blood lust. It is, in every literal sense, a savage and pagan religion which incites its worshippers first to a barbaric frenzy and then prompts them to vent their animal ferocity in the practice of every horrible, ruthless and unmentionable atrocity upon innocent men, women and children. Such are the true Jewish virtues! And the world will feel their sting so long as they continue to tolerate Israel and her peoples on the earth, for those Jewish traits are the same as those which, emanating from the Jewish soul, animated the Jewish tribes of yore. We have but to examine the development of those tribes to perceive just to what extent within the Jewish soul, the Jewish ideal of world conquest and dominion really lies.

… Such is the ” Chosen Master-Race” of the world!
[Read more...]

Filed Under: 'state' of Israel, Anti-Defamation League (ADL), anti-Semitism, Arthur Topham/ Contributor, B'nai Brith, Babylonian Talmud, Editor's Zone, Elizabeth Dilling, Freedom of Expression, Germany, Germany Must Perish!, Harry Abrams, Internet Freedom, Islam, Israeli Terrorism, Jewish Holocaust Industry, Jewish Lobby, Jewish Media Monopoly, Jewish Porn Industry, Jews, Jews Behind Bolshevik Revolution, Judaism, Law & Justice, New World Order, Palestine, Political Zionism, The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, Theodore N. Kaufman, Zionist Atrocities, Zionist Jews in Russia

One Year without Section 13 Ã¢â‚¬Â¦ and the sky has not fallen!

May 28, 2011 by admin

RADLOGOLATEST
Dear Radical Reader,

I wish to acknowledge the fine efforts by Marc Lemire and his lawyer Barbara Kulaszka to get the Section 13 story out to the general public. Please take a few moments to read the article and then do your darnedest to pass it along to others. Canadians need to know what’s truly at stake here and who is being all of these false cries of “anti-Semitism” and so-called “hate crimes.”

For Peace & Justice for All,

Arthur Topham
Pub/Ed
RadicalPress.com
“Digging to the root of the issues since 1998″
_____________________________________

SkyFallin
One Year without Section 13 Ã¢â‚¬Â¦ and the sky has not fallen!

The Ã¢â‚¬Å“perfect stormÃ¢â‚¬Â is here to rid Canada of censorship legislation

by Marc Lemire

May 27, 2011

marc@lemire.com
http://www.freedomsite.org/legal/may2011_perfect_storm.html

Exactly one year ago, the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal issued two rulings (Henry Makow and Arthur Topham) which effectively stopped all enforcement of Section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act.Ã‚Â Section 13 is CanadaÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s pernicious censorship law, which outlaws Internet postings by controversial writers, bloggers and internet commentators. Victims of Section 13 could be hit with fines up to $10,000 (to $30,000 for hurt feelings) and a lifetime gag order, which if violated could result in a prison sentence up to 5 years.

The landmark ruling of the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal stopped all Section 13 cases until the final outcome in my case.Ã‚Â Based on the fanatical rights enforcers at the Canadian Human Rights Commission Ã¢â‚¬â€œ who have so far refused to accept any criticism of their activities Ã¢â‚¬â€œ my case could well go on for many more years, until the Supreme Court of Canada can rule.Ã‚Â Unfortunately, the CHRC has shown over and over again their willingness to throw as much tax-payers money as they can to keep their censorship franchise running.

Rumors have it that the Canadian Human Rights Commission screamed about how bad it would be if the Tribunal stopped enforcement of Section 13 and demanded that the Makow and Topham cases proceed regardless of the Lemire Tribunal decision, which found Section 13 to be unconstitutional.Ã‚Â The Human Rights Ã¢â‚¬Å“chicken littleÃ¢â‚¬â„¢sÃ¢â‚¬Â warned how the sky would fall if they could not harass and censor Canadians for daring to speak out.

To their credit, the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal did the right thing after senior Tribunal member Hadjis found that Section 13 was unconstitutional.Ã‚Â In the rulings issued by Tribunal member Edward Lustig he highlighted the comprehensiveness of the Hadjis ruling.

[4] On September 2, 2009 the Tribunal released its decision in the matter of Warman v. Lemire, 2009 CHRT 26. That case involved a complaint under s. 13 (1) of the CHRA. In his very comprehensive decision, Member Hadjis concluded:

“… I have also concluded that s. 13 (1) in conjunction with ss. 54 (1) and (1.1) are inconsistent with s. 2 (b) of the Charter, which guarantees the freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression. The restriction imposed by these provisions is not a reasonable limit within the meaning of s. 1 of the Charter.”

[8] I have reviewed the submissions of the parties and have concluded that it would be appropriate and would properly serve the interests of justice if this matter was adjourned. While the Supreme Court of Canada has ruled in Canada (Human Rights Commission) v. Taylor, 1990 3 S.C.R. 892 that s. 13 (1) of the CHRA is constitutional, the application now before the Federal Court seeks to bring clarity to this issue in view of the distinct factual and legal context giving rise to this Tribunal’s decision in Warman v. Lemire. Clearly Member Hadjis’ decision goes beyond the consideration alone of the penalty provisions in s. 54 of the CHRA, as he chose not to “read out” the penalty provisions and preserve s. 13 of the CHRA. It is now up to the Federal Court to determine the operability of s. 13 of the CHRA. This will achieve the clarity that the Commission has indicated and that I agree is desirable in order to allow the Tribunal to be able to determine this and other cases brought under s. 13 of the CHRA.

[9] For these reasons I hereby adjourn these proceedings sine die pending the final outcome in the Warman v. Lemire case.

Paragraph 8 of the Lustig decision was a real dismissal of the CHRCÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s Ã¢â‚¬Å“chicken littleÃ¢â‚¬â„¢sÃ¢â‚¬Â claims in their appeal to the Federal Court of Canada in my case, where they claim that Hadjis should have just dropped the penalty provisions of Section 54 and keep Section 13 as constitutional legislation.Ã‚Â As everyone knows who has read the Hadjis decision in my case, it was clear that he was finding that BOTH Section 13 (censorship provision) and Section 54 (fines and lifetime speech bans) were unconstitutional.

The Sky is Falling!Ã‚Â The Sky is Falling!

After a year without the enforcement of Section 13, has the sky fallen as the rights enforcers claimed it would?Ã‚Â Has a new Hitler seized control of Parliament? Is the Ã¢â‚¬Å“Nazi PartyÃ¢â‚¬Â on the verge of a Ã¢â‚¬Å“putschÃ¢â‚¬Â of Kanada?Ã‚Â Are Jews and homosexuals being dragged out on Yonge Street in Toronto and beaten? Have the Ã¢â‚¬Å“NazisÃ¢â‚¬Â seized control of the entire Internet?

As crazy as this might seem, just have a look at the joint legal submissions of the Canadian Jewish Congress, League for Human Rights of BÃ¢â‚¬â„¢nai Brith and the Friends of the Simon Wiesenthal Centre in my case.Ã‚Â These self-proclaimed Ã¢â‚¬Å“spokesthingysÃ¢â‚¬Â of the Canadian Jewish community, have claimed that Section 13 is desperately needed for the Ã¢â‚¬Å“physical and psychological securityÃ¢â‚¬Â of Ã¢â‚¬Å“the Canadian Jewish communityÃ¢â‚¬Â.

Huh?

The Ã¢â‚¬Å“physicalÃ¢â‚¬Â security of the Ã¢â‚¬Å“Canadian Jewish CommunityÃ¢â‚¬Â??? So, after a year without the Ã¢â‚¬Å“physical and psychological securityÃ¢â‚¬Â is the Canadian Jewish Community on the verge of being harassed and dehumanized?Ã‚Â Uh no. no. no. no. no. no. and no.

Ezra Levant wrote in 2008 that Ã¢â‚¬Å“I didn’t know that I [as a Jewish Canadian] was supposed to be a caricature of a thin-skinned Jew, a neurotic Woody Allen stereotype, a perpetual victim. Ã¢â‚¬Â¦ There is one useful element to their psychobabble dressed up as a legal brief. It is proof, in their own writing, that section 13 is being abused in ways that were never contemplated — let alone permitted — by our Supreme Court when they last assessed section 13 in 1990. To protect Jewish “psychological security”? So that’s all it takes to trump our fundamental freedom of speech, as enshrined in the Charter of Rights, Bill of Rights, and 800 years of common law?Ã¢â‚¬Â

Ã¢â‚¬Å“Physical SecurityÃ¢â‚¬Â Hey we need speech laws!Ã‚Â Oh Actual violence? We have nothing to say

The Canadian Jewish Congress wants to limit freedom of speech, using the draconian Section 13 of the Canadian Human Right Act to make sure the Ã¢â‚¬Å“Canadian Jewish communityÃ¢â‚¬Â is protected from Ã¢â‚¬Å“hate speechÃ¢â‚¬Â which will ensure that Ã¢â‚¬Å“as a last resort that harmful speech does not progress into violence.Ã¢â‚¬Â

YET.Ã‚Â Ã‚Â When anti-Semitic violence is actually done towards Canadian Jews by radical Muslims.Ã‚Â The Canadian Jewish Congress is almost silent.

Think about this:

The Canadian Jewish Congress is spending tens of thousands to oppose freedom of speech and uphold Section 13(1) of the Canadian Human Rights Act, which has lead to the censorship of such Ã¢â‚¬Å“anti-SemiticÃ¢â‚¬Â publications as the Western Standard, Maclean’s and Catholic Insight. Ã¢â‚¬Â¦Ã‚Â YET they are not going to spend any time or resources tracking down or exposing the Muslim extremists who attacked a Jew and supporter of Israel with a machete in Ottawa last year.Ã‚Â Is it possible the Ceej is a bit out of touch with reality?Ã‚Â [hmm.Ã‚Â Ã‚Â Yes!]

Oh and not surprisinglyÃ¢â‚¬Â¦ not a single word in the entire Canadian Jewish CongressÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s submissions were about radical Muslim haters such as Al-Hayiti, I guess it is not hate (if youÃ¢â‚¬â„¢re Muslim that is) to write that Gays should be “beheaded”, and that Jews “spread corruption”.

The Ã¢â‚¬Å“Perfect StormÃ¢â‚¬Â to blow away Section 13!

The Lemire case has finally been scheduled to be heard at the Federal Court of Canada in December, 2011. Unfortunately, the entire weight of removing Section 13 is now completely on my shoulders.

Every Section 13 case before the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal has been stopped pending my case.Ã‚Â Ã‚Â Other cases at the Federal Court of Canada have also been stopped pending the final disposition in my case.Ã‚Â Several Ã¢â‚¬Å“cease and desistÃ¢â‚¬Â (permanent life-time speech bans) orders issued by the Tribunal have also been put on hold until my case is over. This is certainly a lot of pressure, but I am up for it!Ã‚Â It will be a cold day in hell when I will bow down and kiss the feet of these bastard censors.

Also it seems doubtful that a political solution will come about either.Ã‚Â The Conservative government has been very quiet about Section 13, even tho many individual MPs have spoken out, and even the Conservatives Policy Convention voted overwhelmingly to remove Section 13. Stephen Harper seems to be looking at increasing censorship on the Internet.

Thankfully a set of events have come together to make the Ã¢â‚¬Å“perfect stormÃ¢â‚¬Â against this censorship legislation.

Firstly and most importantly, I am the only Canadian in the 35+ year history of the Canadian Human Rights Act to ever win a case before the Tribunal. This was HUGE.Ã‚Â To be able to win in a Ã¢â‚¬Å“kangaroo courtÃ¢â‚¬Â Ã¢â‚¬â€œ setup by the censors themselves Ã¢â‚¬â€œ is as decisive as any court victory could possibly be.Ã‚Â This means the onus is on the CHRC to overturn the ruling, and the wind is at our back. (Talk about a perverse Alice-in-Wonderland system.Ã‚Â At the Federal Court, I will be defending the Tribunal, while the CHRC will be slamming them)

Secondly, many Canadians not realize the true threat that the Canadian Human Rights Act poses and under no circumstances can it be properly administered.Ã‚Â From mainstream books like Ã¢â‚¬Å“ShakedownÃ¢â‚¬Â to hundreds of articles denouncing Section 13 in the press, a climate has been fostered which will not only allow Section 13 to fall, but will welcome it with open arms.Ã‚Â Dozens of politicians have spoken out against Section 13, the Conservative Party convention voted 98% in favor of removing Section 13 and even bills have were introduced in Parliament to strike down the section [See M-446]. The Act has to be wiped from Canadian laws books.

Thirdly, the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal has stopped all enforcement of Section 13, which in essence means the law has no force or effect.Ã‚Â By the time my hearing actually gets to court in December 2011, Section 13 will not have been enforced for over a year and a half.Ã‚Â To be constitutional under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Section 13 has to pass the proportionality test.Ã‚Â This test looks at the Ã¢â‚¬Å“pressing and substantialÃ¢â‚¬Â nature of the law.Ã‚Â As each day passes with Section not being enforced by the Tribunal, how could anyone logically argue that Section 13 censorship is desperately needed in Canada?Ã‚Â Each day that passes with Section 13 not being enforced, is one day closer to the law being wiped off the legal books of Canada.

Fourthly, the Attorney General of Canada has outright refused to stand by this law at the Federal Court of Canada.Ã‚Â The Attorney General of Canada (AG) played a key role in my Tribunal hearing, and they attended every single day of the hearing.Ã‚Â They made many submissions and strenuously argued in favor of keeping Section 13.Ã‚Â But after the Tribunal threw out Section 13, the AG accepted the decision and no longer would defend the law.Ã‚Â An Access to Information request filed by myself in 2009 showed that upwards of 30 lawyers and others at the Dept. of Justice reviewed every aspect of my case, and specifically chose to accept the Tribunals ruling.Ã‚Â This is a huge signal to the Federal Court justices who will eventually hear my case.Ã‚Â This is Federal legislation and not even the Federal Attorney General (who is tasked with enforcing all laws in Canada) wants to defend it.

Fifthly, several high profile civil liberties organizations have intervened in my case.Ã‚Â Both the Canadian Civil Liberties Association and the BC Civil Liberties Association have intervened in my case and submitted very good legal arguments in favor of striking down Section 13.Ã‚Â These two organizations join the Canadian Free Speech League and the Canadian Association for Free Expression, who also intervened in my case while it was at the Tribunal level.Ã‚Â The inclusion of these civil liberties associations send a clean signal to the Federal Court that my case has far reaching implications and that freedom of speech is being infringed.

And lastly, even before I have set a single foot in court, I have won half the case.Ã‚Â The Canadian Human Rights Commission has conceded that the penalty provisions of the Canadian Human Rights Act (which allows heavy fines) is unconstitutional.Ã‚Â The CHRC was fanatic at the Tribunal to keep Section 54 (fines) but after the Hadjis ruling which found Section 54 was unconstitutional, the CHRC was forced to concede that … yes indeed it was.Ã‚Â This means that of my constitutional challenge against Section 13 and 54, I have won half of it already, since no matter what happens, the penalty provisions of Section 54 will be struck down.Ã‚Â It brings a smile to my face when I read these anonymous hate-bloggers who pound away at their keyboards that I have Ã¢â‚¬Å“no chanceÃ¢â‚¬Â in ever winning.Ã‚Â While they spread their filth and lies, I sat quietly and worked away in the background and have already won half my case.

My Kick-Ass Lawyer Ã¢â‚¬â€œ Barbara Kulaszka

Above all else, the real Ã¢â‚¬Å“perfect stormÃ¢â‚¬Â against Section 13 is my courageous lawyer Ã¢â‚¬â€œ Barbara Kulaszka.Ã‚Â Her in-depth knowledge of this law and never back down style has singlehandedly taken down Section 13. BarbaraÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s legal submissions were clear, concise and brilliantly written.Ã‚Â She is the only lawyer to ever win a Section 13 case in the 35 year history of this law.Ã‚Â That really is an amazing accomplishment!Ã‚Â And she didnÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t win in front of some impartial jury of her peers Ã¢â‚¬â€œ no Ã¢â‚¬â€œ she won in a place setup by censors, for censors and staffed by censors, who must have an Ã¢â‚¬Å“interest in, and sensitivity to, human rightsÃ¢â‚¬Â.

Barbara Kulaszka is one hell of a lawyer and very well respected by her peers.Ã‚Â Thanks to her work, Section 13 is on the verge of being thrown out.Ã‚Â She is one person that really deserves the Order of Canada, to recognize her significant achievements and remarkable service on behalf of all freedom minded Canadians.

——————–

To keep up to date, please bookmark my website, which will has updates on Section 13 censorship, freedom and my case.Ã‚Â The URL is http://www.freedomsite.org

Marc Lemire
Human Rights Activist
May 26, 2011

http://blog.freedomsite.org/2011/05/one-year-without-section-13-and-sky-has.html
http://canadianhumanrightscommission.blogspot.com/2011/05/one-year-without-section-13-and-sky-has.html

—————————————–
I need your help at the Federal Court

Fighting the fanatics at the Canadian “Human Rights” Commission and defending freedom of speech for ALL Canadians is not an easy task. In particular, the Federal Court of Canada challenge to defeat CanadaÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s internet censorship legislation, has consumed an immense amount of time and resources. This has meant sacrificing a lot of cherished things in my life that I used to take for granted such as spending precious time with my wonderful children. It’s also very costly and has incurred heavy debts given that I’m facing a “Human Rights” juggernaut that has a limitless budget. It has already spent millions and is prepared to spend a lot more of your tax dollars to keep their thought control machine running.

My courageous lawyer Barbara Kulaszka and myself have demonstrated what two dedicated researchers can accomplish against overwhelming odds. We have single-handedly and doggedly fought the system and exposed the corrupt underbelly of the “Human Rights” Commission’s fanatics. Nothing ever comes easy when you are fighting such a racket. This case is a seminal one, where the outcome will have serious implications on our right to think and speak freely in this country for generations to come. All Canadians will benefit if we manage to get this shameful law expunged from our legal books.

Every victory we’ve attained against the “Human Rights” juggernaut has come at great expense. Nothing has come easy.Ã‚Â In fact, the Ã¢â‚¬Å“Human RightsÃ¢â‚¬Â Commission has done everything in their power to stop exposure of their twisted censorship agenda.

I cannot carry on this important fight alone. Your donations literally equal the survival of this case. I wish to thank all those that have donated to this worthy cause. Please donate directly to us so that I can send out a personal thank you. If you have donated to another organization or individual please contact me so I can thank you directly and send you a copy of our special booklet that is for our supporters only.

How you can help:

DONATE NOW to Marc LemireÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s Challenge:Ã‚Â Via PayPal

Support Marc Lemire’s Constitutional Challenge

Be part of the Freedom team and contribute what you can to defeat this horrible law and protect Freedom of Speech in Canada !

Via Mail: Send Cheque or Money Order to:

Marc Lemire
152 Carlton Street
PO Box 92545
Toronto, Ontario
M5A 2K1
Canada

ItÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s time to end the censorship of the extremist Canadian Human Rights Commission!

Stop Section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act

http://www.StopSection13.com
http://www.freedomsite.org
http://blog.freedomsite.org
http://canadianhumanrightscommission.blogspot.com

Filed Under: Anti-Defamation League (ADL), anti-Semitism, B'nai Brith, Canadian Human Rights Act, Canadian Human Rights Commission, Canadian Human Rights Tribunal, Canadian Jewish Congress, Canadian Politics, Editor's Zone, Freedom of Expression, Freedom of Thought, Harry Abrams, Internet Freedom, Jewish Lobby, Jews, Law & Justice, Marc Lemire, Political Zionism

World Jewish Congress approves resolution calling for criminalizing Holocaust denial

How Many Jews? by Douglas Reed

Sweden: Bishop (member of billionaire Jewish media dynasty) wants to censor and edit the Christian Bible

The Real Terror is the Law by John Kaminski

The Trial of Guenter Deckert by Sylvia Stolz (English translation by Christine B. Miller)

Palestine: Jewish Settlers Occupy Christian Monastery, Raise Israeli Flag

Paul Fromm on the Demise of Free Speech in Canada by Prof. Kevin MacDonald

The Tyee: Zionist Collaborator and Hate-monger promotes Fear and Smear campaign against Doug Christie

Canada’s Israel Lobby by Peyton Vaughn Lyon

Patmos, The Emperor Worship Cultus, and The American Sniper by Pastor Mark Dankof

Radical Press Interview with Mark Glenn on The Ugly Truth BlogRadio Show

Mahatma Gandhi Rejected Zionism by Professor A. K. Ramakrishnan

Zionist-Jew controlled CSIS spy agency joins ADL in smear campaign again the Freeman on the Land movement in Canada

The Men Who Taste Jews in Their Sandwiches by Jim Goad

Zionist Terror Tactics – a political cartoon from RadicalPress.com

Ashkenazi European Zionist Jews don’t speak for ALL Jews – Shazer Everquar

Anonymous takes down over 9000 Jewish websites

Jewish Global News Service runs Radical Press Smear Story

The Military Solution by J. Bruce Campbell

The Military Solution

Canada clamps down on Israel criticism

The Morgenthau Plan for Israel by J.B. Campbell

Seeing is Disbelieving by Edgar J. Steele

Defanging the serpent: Final Solution for World Peace by Ian V. Macdonald

ISRAEL MUST PERISH! The Book that the Jews Fear By Arthur Topham

One Year without Section 13 Ã¢â‚¬Â¦ and the sky has not fallen!

Donate via PayPal

Below Deck

Click to join Anti-Zionist Canada group

Pages

Recent Posts

Blogroll

Archives

Meta