Browsing: News

Life’s a Gamble So is Donald Trump By Michael Collins Piper


The following detailed background on billionaire real estate developer, TV personality, author and GOP presidential candidate Donald J. Trump comes courtesy of an excerpt from Michael Collins Piper’s book, The New Jerusalem: Zionist Power in America, which was published in 2004 by AMERICAN FREE PRESS.
By Michael Collins Piper
An inquiry into the background of flamboyant American entrepreneur Donald J. Trump provides some surprising insights into Trump’s path to power and influence, for the fact is that Trump’s rise to stardom came as a direct consequence of his having functioned as hardly more than a colorful front man for some very wealthy behind-the-scenes sponsors.
Everyone knows, of course, about Trump’s gambling operations and of the wide-ranging links of the gambling industry to organized crime. But the story is much bigger than that. In his own memoir, The Art of the Deal, Trump proudly described how in 1987 he bought his first casino interests when he purchased 93% of the voting stock in the Resorts International gambling concern.
What Trump doesn’t tell his readers is what the late Andrew St. George reported in The Spotlight on October 30, 1978 (and in the previous September 25, 1978, issue): Resorts International was established and controlled by front men for the Rockefeller and Rothschild families and their ‘enforcers’ in the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and its allied intelligence agency, Israel’s Mossad.
What made the report so explosive was that this newspaper pointed out that the illegally rigged casinos were being operated with the collusion of ‘respectable’ politicians, law enforcement officials, Wall Street financiers who floated loans to finance the gambling resorts and the high-profile gambling resort operators themselves.
St. George pointed out that many of these casino resorts run by the mob through a variety of front men have actually been engaged in a de facto partnership with behind-the-scenes mobsters who have assisted the CIA and the Mossad in massive laundering of drug and gambling profits that have been channeled into covert operations of the two allied
intelligence agencies. In return, the CIA and the Mossad, using their own influence, have provided ‘protection’ for the illegally fixed gambling operations, preventing law enforcement authorities from cracking down on this corruption.
Where does would-be president Trump fit into the picture? To find the answer, one must turn to the murky origins of Resorts International.
Resorts evolved from a CIA front company set up in the early 1950s by then-CIA director Allen W. Dulles and his close associate, three-term New York Governor Thomas E. Dewey, political functionary in the so-called ‘Rockefeller Republican’ wing of the GOP.
The front company in question was the innocuously named Mary Carter Paint Company, which operated a national chain of paint stores but was set up to function as a covert CIA money-laundering operation.
In 1958-59 Dewey and a number of associates used a reported $2 million in CIA funds to buy a controlling interest in the Crosby-Miller Corporation (headed by Dewey friend James Crosby), which was then merged with Mary Carter.
Softcover, 184 pages
Only 50 left in stock—‘When they’re gone, they’re gone!’
Among other things, the new corporation laundered CIA money for arming the anti-Castro Cuban exiles. The company also launched into lucrative casino gambling enterprises in the Caribbean where the CIA was quite active during that period, having engaged the Lansky crime syndicate in now-thoroughly documented and widely known plots to topple Fidel Castro who had enraged the mob by closing down its Cuban gambling enterprises.
Thus it should be no surprise that in 1963, Alvin I. Malnik, a top henchman of crime syndicate boss Meyer Lansky, was found to be closely connected to the operations of Mary Carter Paint.
In 1963, Mary Carter Paint spun off its paint division and during the next several years began developing its casino operations, particularly in the Bahamas. In 1967-68, Mary Carter Paint officially changed its name to Resorts International and began massive international expansion. The Spotlight determined that several principal investors provided the funds and assets for the venture:
• Meyer Lansky, the acknowledged ‘chairman of the board’ and chief financier of the underworld gambling syndicate, who maintained his own longstanding ties to not only Israel and the Mossad, but also the CIA and the American intelligence community;
• David Rockefeller, head of the Rockefeller financial empire, who provided his family’s clout and CIA and global banking connections to assist in the operation;
• The Investors Overseas Service (IOS), then the world’s largest flight-capital conglomerate, controlling assets worth $2.5 billion.
• Tibor Rosenbaum, who was not only the Mossad’s Swiss-based chief financier behind covert arms deals but also the head of the Banque De Credit Internationale of Geneva, the Lansky syndicate’s chief European money laundry; and
• Baron Edmond de Rothschild of the European banking family and a personal business partner of Rosenbaum in Rosenbaum’s Mossad-related ventures ranging far and wide; and lastly,
• William Mellon Hitchcock, one of the heirs to the Mellon family fortune (one of America’s largest private family fortunes, which, for many years, has also maintained close ties with the CIA).
Resorts International expanded by leaps and bounds and soon became one of the most profitable of all the gambling enterprises, and by 1970 the underworld figures who were running the casinos (in league with their behind-the-scenes partners) began moving to expand casino gambling in the United States.
Mob chief Lansky called a high-level meeting of gambling syndicate figures in Acapulco, Mexico and there the assembled mobsters pinpointed the fading resort of Atlantic City as their first new target. (Prior to that time, of course, the mob had already established Nevada as the only outpost of legalized gambling on U.S. soil.)
In the wake of this meeting, the resources of Resorts International were used (publicly and privately) to begin the lobbying campaign that resulted in the legalizing of gambling in Atlantic City and once the New Jersey legislature opened up the Garden State, Resorts moved in.
In 1987, upon the death of longtime CIA front man James Crosby, the nominal head of Resorts International, up-and-coming young New York real estate tycoon Donald Trump stepped into the picture and bought Crosby’s interest in the gambling empire.
Trump soon became a household name, with his colorful personality and his insistence upon naming a variety of luxury hotels, apartment houses and other commercial ventures after himself. But while the name ‘Trump’ appeared in the headlines, the names of the real movers behind Resorts International remained hidden from public view.

Michael Collins Piper was an author, journalist, lecturer and radio show host, and had spoken in Russia, Malaysia, Iran, Abu Dhabi, Japan, Canada and the U.S.

{ Comments are closed }



Editor’s Note: With the exception of the final Charge to the Jury by B.C.S.C. Justice Butler the full transcript of the trial proceedings in the case of R V ROY ARTHUR TOPHAM from October 26, 2015 to November 12, 2015 are contained in the following pdf files.
It is suggested that these files be downloaded for future reference and in the interest of securing a permanent record of this important free speech trial in Canada.
Arthur Topham
The Radical Press
Canada’s Radical News Network
‘Digging to the root of the issues since 1998’

{ Comments are closed }

Burns OregonLive from refugeFBI seige happening now!

Guys please do your part as Americans and call the Portland, Oregon FBI office and the local county sheriff office and try to get the government to stand down. 5,000 people are listening now. I just called the Portland, Oregon FBI office and asked the operator to let the concerns of the American people be know to the FBI operatives on scene at the refuge right now. We can influence what happens there tonight. Get your phone and call the FBI office in Portland, Oregon right now. Don’t make threats, just express your concerns and be polite. The lady on the phone was very polite and said she would relay our message to the FBI operatives at the refuge. This is our duty as Americans guys, we need to prevent any further bloodshed after the cold-blooded murder of LaVoy Finicum. I will provide all the numbers below.
Number for the Portland, Oregon FBI Office: (503) 224 4181 (Press 0 to speak to an operative once the automated system starts giving you the options such as Press 1, 2, 3 for…etc)
Number for the Harney County local sheriff’s department: (541) 573 6156
Links to other parts to the crisis on YouTube.
Watch ‘Burns Oregon—Live from refugeFBI siege happening now! part 1’ on YouTube

Watch ‘Burns Oregon Live from refugeFBI seige happening now! part 2’ on YouTube

Watch ‘Burns OregonLive from refugeFBI seige happening now! part 3’ on YouTube

Watch ‘Burns OregonLive from refugeFBI seige happening now! part 4’ on YouTube

Watch ‘Burns OregonLive from the refugeFBI seige happening now! part 5’ on YouTube

Watch ‘Burns OregonLive from refugeFBI seige happening now! part 6’ on YouTube

Watch ‘Burns OregonLive from refugeFBI seige happening now! part 7’ on YouTube

Watch ‘Burns OregonLive from refugeFBI seige happening now! part 8’ on YouTube

Watch ‘Burns OregonLive from refugeFBI siege happening now! part 9’ on YouTube

Watch ‘Burns OregonLive from refugeFBI siege happening now! part 10’ on YouTube

Burns OregonLive from refugeFBI seige happening now! part 4
Please visit Gavin Seim’s channel:
Joshua Lai
Joshua Lai Listening to it right now
Erin Gürel
Erin Gürel Didn’t think things would escalate like this all of a sudden.
Dawn Maria Schute
Dawn Maria Schute I live in Portland, OR!!
John Bennett
John Bennett I don’t live in the United States, what happened?
Erin Gürel
Erin Gürel Please make sure to call in!
Erin Gürel
Erin Gürel Basically the whole refuge is surrounded by FBI vehicles and armed men and the people at the compound are either saying leave (to the FBI) or kill us all.
John Bennett
John Bennett HABBENING
Pedro Ruiz Damn! The FBI has sure gone nuts. What is wrong with those people!
Erin Gürel
Erin Gürel This is what happens when the tribe controls America! They made the people become enemies of one another!
Erich Köhler
Erich Köhler Woah shit, get me up to speed what’s going down?
Erin Gürel
Erin Gürel Basically the whole refuge is surrounded by FBI vehicles and armed men and the people at the compound are either saying leave (to the FBI) or kill us all.
Erich Köhler
Erich Köhler Verdammt. Alright, I’ll get in it, and a friend of mine.
Erin Gürel
Erin Gürel Part 9 is up now guys.
Watch ‘Burns OregonLive from refugeFBI siege happening now! part 9’ on YouTube…See More

Burns OregonLive from refugeFBI siege happening now! part 9
Erin Gürel
Erin Gürel Hans Pietsch
Erich Köhler
Erich Köhler Just look up The Watchmans News, it’s all one livestream!
Erin Gürel
Erin Gürel Thanks man! I found it on another channel! I’ll tag you.
Hans Pietsch
Hans Pietsch I cant watch, no data sadly
Erin Gürel
Erin Gürel Connie Cruickshank
Luke Edward Mitchell
Luke Edward Mitchell What’s happening man ?

{ Comments are closed }

B’nai Brith v. Zionism’s Battle for Control of Canada’s Mind

Greetings Reader: The information contained in the article below, which is actually my response to the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal’s ‘offer’ to participate in a mediation process with Mr. Harvey Smarba and the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada, is of vital concern to all Canadians who take the issue of Internet Censorship seriously. As such I would strongly suggest that you do your utmost to assist me in moving this story/letter about the net in the most expedient manner possible. The next, and final stage of this Bolshevik Show Trial will be a ‘hearing’ by the CHR Tribunal which will take place within a month or two and likely conclude with a decision to try and shut down my website . Your help would be greatly appreciated.
Arthur Topham


B’nai Brith v. Zionism’s Battle for Control of Canada’s Mind

by Arthur Topham
January 28, 2009


The following letter is a reply sent to Nancy Lafontant, Registry Officer and Gregory M. Smith, Registrar of the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal, a quasi-judicial federal agency now in the process of preparing for a Tribunal hearing regarding the complaint to the Canadian Human Rights Commission by Harvey Smarba and The League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada against

The reply contains the argument put forth by owner and publisher Arthur Topham that this is a case of an intentional attack upon one of the last remaining alternative news network in Canada one willing to stand up to the Zionist-controlled media and the assorted Zionist Jewish lobby groups that hold way too much influence over Canada’s Judiciaries and governments, both federally and provincially.

The means being employed by B’nai Brith Canada is the infamous anti-hate law contained in the Canadian Human Rights Act and known as Sec. 13(1).

The publisher maintains that the Tribunal’s offer to ‘mediate’ is but a meaningless formality due to the fact than never in the history of the CHRC or the CHRT has a case been won by any of the numerous respondents who have been entrapped by this vile legal trap, one that NEVER allows the Truth to get in its way. NOT UNLESS OF COURSE YOU HAPPEN TO BE JEWISH AND PRO-ZIONIST!

The letter outlines much of the efforts by other victims of this Bolshevik bit of legislation as well as attempts by sane people across Canada to convince the federal government to toss this specious piece of pro-Zionist handiwork into the trash bin of history and at the same time dismantle all the Human Rights Commissions across Canada, be they provincial or federal. The dangers inherent in such quasi-judicial bodies has now become only too obvious at this stage of the game. [A.T.]

B’nai Brith v. Zionism’s Battle for Control of Canada’s Mind

by Arthur Topham

January 28, 2009

Nancy Lafontant
Registry Officer
Gregory M. Smith

Registry Officer / Agent du greffe
Canadian Human Rights Tribunal / Tribunal canadien des droits de la personne

Ottawa, ON K1A 1J4/ Ottawa (Ontario) K1A 1J4
[email protected]
Telephone | Téléphone 613-947-1137
Facsimile | Télécopieur 613-995-3484
Teletypewriter | Téléimprimeur 613-563-6460
Government of Canada | Gouvernement du Canada


Arthur Topham
The Radical Press
4633 Barkerville Highway
Quesnel, B.C. V2J 6T8

January 28, 2009.

Dear Ms. Nancy Lafontant and Gregory M. Smith:

RE: Your Tribunal email letter of January 14, 2009 regarding,
Tribunal Harvey Smarba and The League for Human Rights of B’Nai Brith Canada v. Arthur Topham and
Your File: T1360/9008

Since receiving your email letter of January 14, 2009 I have given much serious thought and consideration to your ‘offer’ of mediation in the complaint filed by Mr. Harvey Smarba and The League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada against my person and my website .

Contained in this somewhat lengthy reply you will find my response. Please bear in mind that what is written is done so in a spirit of honest, frank, open-minded and loving intent; designed to address and ultimately resolve in an abbreviated synopsis, the overall issue that is presently at stake in this case. Therefore, no remarks or comments of mine, regardless of their apparent harshness or levity are intended to offend, malign or denigrate any of the parties concerned, which includes the Tribunal and its members.

With respect to the entrapment legislation (which is how I interpret Sec. 13(1) of the CHR Act), whether or not there ever existed or does exist a case of its nature, wherein mediation has benefited the ‘Respondent’ at no cost to their principles, beliefs, integrity or rights I am unaware of it. Perhaps the recent one involving Harvey Smarba and The League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada v. Al Rycroft and (one set in tandem and paralleling my own) is an exception to this general rule but, not being privy to the details of said case as to whether or not any self-censorship was involved, I cannot make any definitive statement on it one way or another. I do know though that it was initiated by the same parties who have conjoined to bring about the complaint against myself and my website and that in the case of it was settled in favour of the respondent but what effect that case will have or has had upon the issue of the ultimate illegality of this specious Section of the Canadian Human Rights Act remains to be seen. It is one case shrouded in almost complete secrecy since the complaint was first laid.

What I am privy to though and acutely cognizant of, is the ultimate nature of this particular complaint and its intended purpose which, I contend, has nothing to do with the issue of ‘Hate’ or ‘anti-Semitism’ or ‘Racism’ or any of the other carefully crafted, misleading phrases and loaded terminology used by both the complainants and, tragically, your own departments within the Canadian Human Rights Commission (CHRC) and the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal (CHRT).

Obviously this issue deals with the primary, fundamental, God-given right, as contained within Canada’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms and elsewhere, to freedom of thought and speech as well as freedom of the media to publish whatever is deemed relevant as either news or views; barring of course all which currently falls within the legal parameters of Canada’s Libel laws and those whose related purpose is to prevent acts of malicious violence toward an individual or group and/or seditious acts against the government of Canada and its sovereign citizens.

As I have previously stated, both in my original Response to the CHRC Investigating officer ( January 3, 2008 ) and in my Comments on the CHRC final Report ( see: Sept 17/08 ), this is not a simple case of a person of ‘Jewish faith’ being personally maligned or threatened or libeled. Nor is a mundane example of some benign, benevolent society within the ranks of Canada’s multi-cultural social milieu being unduly criticized or picked on for spiteful or vexatious reasons. It is much more complex and convoluted and important, relatively speaking.

It has always been the contention of and myself, well before this case arose, that the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada is today a strongly political and vociferous pro-Zionist arm of the Mossad, the designated name for Israel’s unofficial spy network. As such its direct and full complicity with the state of Israel in their covert operations abroad and in its capacity as one of Israel’s most powerful lobby groups here in Canada, makes it de facto, an organization whose operations, both within Canada and without, are justifiably suspect and deserving of the most extreme scrutiny by the media, alternative or otherwise. I needn’t at this point go into any great detail surrounding the influence of this political lobbyist group here in Canada and its subsequent negative effect upon successive federal governments as per Canada’s role in supporting the racist, apartheid policies of the state of Israel.

As well, unlike the chain of litigations linked to former CHRC lawyer and investigator Ricardo Warmouse do to his seemingly endless quest to rid Canada of ‘Hate’, in whatever form it may manifest for him, this particular case involving Harvey Smarba and The League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada is specifically designed to censor and/or destroy a legally-registered, well-established publishing business known as The Radical Press a privately-owned entity which has been operating steadily since June of 1998 and now remains one of the very last, if not the last, alternative news sites in Canada. My guess would be that Harvey Smarba, the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada and the other Jewish lobby groups in Canada have the site posted high upon their ‘anti-Zionist endangered species’ hit list.

The reasons why the The League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada would set out to do such a thing are obvious to any impartial observer aware of the basic tenets underlying the political ideology known as Zionism. The ultimate intent of Zionism, for those unaware of it (and I must include your two departments in this assessment as well), is to subvert all sovereign governments around the world, be they democratic, socialist, fascist or communist and to draw their respective leaders into Zionism’s gigantic web of deceit; one which always tends to benefit the state of Israel. As such, its objectives pose a clear and present danger to the democratic foundation upon which Canada’s government and its social and cultural infrastructure are based.

It was for these reasons that I took it upon myself, as a dedicated, concerned, patriotic and responsible citizen of Canada to expose the disingenuous machinations of this subversive agency; one that attempts to impose itself falsely upon Canadian society as merely a ‘benevolent’ society with little more than a pious intent to assist its membership. In actual fact it is a critical component of a foreign spy network working within that context as a double agent for the state of Israel. As such it should be registered in Ottawa as a foreign lobby group rather than feigning a false ‘Canadian’ face to hide its true countenance and purpose. I say this because any Canadian, who holds their allegiance to Canada first and foremost, would not have the temerity, to accuse their fellow Canadians of spreading ‘hatred toward citizens of Israel’ in the event of any critical commentary aimed at that foreign country.

Nothing more strikingly hideous and shameful for Canada could have occurred to highlight this conviction of mine than the recent slaughter and maiming of thousands of innocent men, women and children in the Palestinian region of Gaza by the Israeli government’s military forces. Canada’s response to this immoral and illegal act of sadistic aggression against a defenseless, beleaguered people was cruelly and graphically revealed in the decision by the Harper Conservative government to give Canada’s full and unqualified support to Israel in its inhumane and unacceptable destruction of Gaza’s people and its infrastructure as clearly shown by the vote in the U.N. regarding an urgent plea for a ceasefire. Canada, ONLY Canada, to the utmost humiliation of its once good name and its moral standing in the world, rather than standing up for Truth and Justice and Freedom and the democratic ideals it professes to believe in, instead prostrated itself before the warlike foreign nation of Israel like some dumb and terrified servant. As a Canadian who fervently believes in his country and its global impression upon the rest of the world; one shown by example, I found this overt act of abject obeisance to the Israeli state to be one of the most disgusting events ever witnessed in my 62 years on this planet.

In terms of my original contention therefore, it is but one more vivid example of how political organizations such as The League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada and the Canadian Jewish Congress (CJC) and the Simon Weisenthal Center (SWC) and other Jewish lobby groups conspire (yes, sadly for some, it is a conspiracy of the highest order and not a mere theory) to use their powerful lobbying positions to influence the moral and legal decisions of Canada’s duly elected representatives so that subsequent actions which reflect upon the whole of Canada’s reputation as a peace-loving nation are subverted to the degrading partisan purposes of an alien, foreign nation; one now recognized by numbers of nations as being highly racist, apartheid, undemocratic and an imminent threat to global peace.

For emphasis once again I will reiterate the fact that this is why Harvey Smarba, acting as B.C.’s ‘agent’ for the Mossad-controlled League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada has been given the job of destroying It is so that news and opinions contained on my website which focus upon and expose this precise issue of the dangers of Zionism to Canadian sovereignty are censored from the eyes of Canadians or anyone else outside of Canada having access to the internet.

I would also submit (once again, and as stated in my Response and Comments see above), that such was the original intent by these and other Jewish lobby groups here in Canada, when they set about creating Canada’s Human Rights Commissions which ultimately gave birth to the odious Sec. 13(1) of the CHR Act.

After the dreadful murder of three thousand American and some Canadian and other foreign citizens in the attack upon the World Trade Center September 11, 2001 evidence quickly began emerging which linked the activities of the Mossad to the event thus incriminating Israel in what now is generally accepted as being the first major false flag event of the 21st Century. In order to, but not limited as such, prevent further evidence from gaining currency around the world, Canada, within three months, quickly drew up its Anti-terrorism Act, 2001, c.41, amending the Criminal Code ostensibly to ‘combat terrorism’. Such, I suggest, was not the only intent of said legislation. In retrospect it also proved to be the precise window required by these anti-democratic, anti-free speech agents of Israel to sneak in, as per their usual subterfuge, Sec. 13(1) into the CHR Act.

Having observed, measured and covered for the past 11 years, covert activities of various nations in greater detail than the average Canadian, it is obvious to me that such a vile, specious piece of legislation, ONLY benefits the pro-Israel and pro-Zionist Jews, their Lobby, their controlled, monopoly Media and their assorted crypto-aspirants and by association identifies all of these entities with the pro-racist and pro-apartheid policies of the Israeli government. It certainly hasn’t, by any stretch of the imagination, benefitted any of the other numerous cases of non-Jews who have already been convicted under this draconian piece of legislation.

These preliminary remarks said I would now like to touch upon some other relevant Sec. 13(1) cases and related initiatives pertinent to my case before concluding this letter.

Paramount throughout the struggle to have Sec. 13(1) erased forever from the statute books of Canada has been the long and tireless effort by Mr. Marc Lemire and his lawyer Barbara Kulaszka. On November 25, 2005, they filed a constitutional challenge against Sec. 13 (see constitutional challenge of Section 13 internet censorship) and Section 54 (one imposing hefty fines) of the Canadian Human Rights Act. That legal challenge dragged on in the courts until September 15-17, 2008 until final submissions were heard at a three day hearing (see: ). A decision by the court is still pending as I write.

The case of the Jewish lawyer and former publisher of the now-defunct Western Standard magazine out of Alberta, Ezra Levant, was another example wherein the Alberta Human Rights Commission had laid charges of illegal ‘discrimination’ against Levant based upon a complaint by the Edmonton Council of Muslim Communities; one related to Levant’s publication in 2006 of the infamous Danish cartoons which were designed to denigrate the Muslim prophet Mohammed. That complaint finally concluded August 6th, 2008 with an acquittal. Levant afterwards, in a column in the National Post, told readers that, unlike the other case of Reverend Stephen Boissoin, another victim of the AHRC who was fined $7,000 and banned for life from giving sermons or even sending private e-mails that were ‘disparaging’ toward homosexuals, Levant’s case was dropped in his favour due to his contention that he had been, ‘a political pain in the neck for the HRC.’ That statement, I suggest, is both false and misleading and I maintain that the real reason why Levant was acquitted was because of the fact that he is Jewish and a supporter of the Zionist ideology.

Another example of my premise that only Jews escape the censor’s noose in Canada came soon after Mr. Lemire’s courageous constitutional challenge to Sec. 13. This one involved a provincial version of hate speech law stemming from B.C. and concerned Canadian journalist Mark Steyn and Maclean’s magazine. It concluded on October 10, 2008 with the decision that Steyn and Maclean’s had not violated B.C.’s hate speech law. Again, the point to bear in mind here is that Steyn’s case was not brought on by any of the Jewish lobby groups mentioned above but by the Canadian Islamic Congress. And, as in the case of Ezra Levant, Steyn, also being a Jew as well as a zealous, self-admitted Zionist, escaped the usual fate of non-Jewish respondents.

Next came the federal Conservative party’s policy convention in Winnipeg in November of 2008 at which time an overwhelming majority of delegates voted in favour of a resolution (P-203) to repeal Section 13 (Internet censorship provision) of the Canadian Human Rights Act. Even Canada’s Minister of Justice, Rob Nicholson voted in favor of P-203. Of course the media were quick to point out that such resolutions are not binding upon the Prime Minister and so thus far, for all the rhetoric and hype in the Zionist media and the right/left blogosphere, no definite actions have been taken to fulfill the aspirations of this majority of delegates. This of course is not meant as a slight upon the obviously sincere delegates themselves but only highlights the fact that in party politics it is the leaders and not the membership who ultimately make the final decisions.

In the immediate wake of Resolution P-203 came once again the renewed efforts of Liberal MP Keith Martin of B.C. (Esquimalt—Juan de Fuca) who had initially put forth a resolution in Parliament calling for the removal of Sec. 13 from the CHR Act back in March of 2008. On November 19, 2008 Dr. Martin introduced two new motions, M-153 and M-156. The first, M-153 states: ‘That, in the opinion of the House, subsection 13(1) of the Canadian Human Rights Act should be deleted from the Act.’ In the second, M-156, the motion states, ‘That, in the opinion of the House, the government should hold public hearings as part of a review of the Canadian Human Rights Act, the Canadian Human Rights Commission and its tribunal.’

To date, to my knowledge, no concrete action has been forthcoming with respect to these two motions.

There are other examples, too many to include here. According to Catholic Insight magazine ‘On June 17, 2008, the Canadian Human Rights Commission (CHRC) launched its own policy review of Section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act (CHRA). Section 13 (added to the Act in 2001) gives the commission the power to investigate and punish instances of ‘hate speech’ on the internet. The 59-page review, conducted by Prof. Richard Moon, an expert on constitutional law and free speech at the University of Windsor, was made public at a cost of over $1,000 a page on November 24, 2008 and is posted on the CHRC website.’ See

Surprisingly, to free speech advocates as well as to the CHRC, Prof. Richard Moon recommended ‘That Section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act be repealed so that the CHRC and the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal (CHRT) no longer deal with hate speech, especially hate speech on the internet.’ The immediate reaction of the CHRC was to go into a state of denial and thus far we have not seen any significant movement on this recommendation.

Catholic Insight, a magazine out of Ontario, Canada, also a victim of charges of discrimination brought on by a peculiar species of complainant known as ‘homo-harasimus‘, also gives us additional examples of similar harassment by the CHRC. As Catholic Insight states, ‘The list of those who have unjustifiably suffered under Canada’s human rights system which Justice Minister Nicholson has described in a letter to C.I. as ’second to none’ is a long and varied one: B.C. teacher Chris Kempling; the Knights of Columbus in B.C.; Calgary Bishop Fred Henry; Alberta Pastor Stephen Boissoin; Saskatchewan’s Hugh Owens and marriage commissioner Orville Nichols; Ezra Levant in Calgary; the Christian Horizons ministry to the disabled in Ontario; Mark Steyn and Maclean’s magazine in Toronto; the mayors of a dozen Canadian cities who have been forced to proclaim ‘gay pride’ days; the website, and more.’

You can include me and in the ‘more’ category, one which is reserved for the ‘more’ dangerous, threatening offenders such as Malcolm Ross, Terry Long, Doug Collins, the notorious non-neo-Nazi Paul Fromm and of course Canada’s ultimate shame Ernst Zundel a man who now rots away in a German prison cell thanks to the egregious machinations of the CHRC and Canada’s Zionist-controlled federal Judiciary.

To conclude:

One would think that after all that has occurred over the last few years regarding these Bolshevik ‘Show Trials’ disguised as Human Rights Tribunal hearings, that all of this would be self-evident to any intelligent person who was in a position to judge the merits of such cases. But unfortunately, logic, reason, intelligence and unbiased, objective thinking, coupled (as in my particular case), with a basic knowledge of the nature of political Zionism, do not appear to be qualities evident either within the CHRC or the CHRT. Otherwise this case would never have progressed to the stage that it now has. Instead of reason and common sense prevailing these two organizations, who have legitimately earned the ignominy of the majority of freedom-loving Canadians, continue to plod incessantly onward toward their ultimate demise seemingly oblivious to the realities that surround their robotic, immoral and unjust movements, all the while crushing more and more innocent people and organizations beneath their blundering, censorship bound Juggernaut.

And so, all that said, this brings me back to my reasons for the decision that I have made with respect to your request for a ‘yes or no’ regarding mediation with the complainants in my case. Bluntly put, (for there really is no other simple way of stating it) there is not a snowball’s chance in Hell that Harvey Smarba or The League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada would agree to any form of mediation that didn’t require agreeing to remove all its controversial articles deemed ‘hateful’ toward ‘Jews or citizens of Israel’. That is not the mandate given Harvey Smarba by the Mossad and as such it precludes any real chance of holding reasonable discussions on the matter. But even if this were the case, at this stage of the game of censorship I have long concluded that to consent in any way or fashion to the imperious demands and whims of the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada would be demeaning to myself as a patriotic Canadian and a man of integrity and a total betrayal of every principle that I’ve held dear for the vast portion of my adult life.

And so as I stated initially I did give a lot of careful consideration to my decision. I have also been given advice by others who are themselves involved in this same battle with the CHRC over Sec. 13(1) suggesting to me that should I agree to such a process, if for no other reason, it might prove advantageous in the final outcome by possibly lessening any sentencing or subsequent fine that might be imposed (just to add injury to insult). I deliberated over that possibility but concluded that morally, reasonably and spiritually it would not be a legitimate reason to subject myself to a process that must inevitably, due to its inherent internal flaws, prove futile.

Besides that it would mean agreeing to having to travel from my home up in central British Columbia, a distance of approximately 600 + km, during the winter, to attend a one-day mediation session that is predestined to fail from the start. For Harvey Smarba it’s a short trip across the strait from Victoria, B.C. and back, albeit with ferry costs, to attend the meeting and for the Tribunal member from your offices a nice, likely first class flight from Ottawa to Vancouver with all expenses paid and replete with a fancy hotel room in the West End and likely some gourmet dining and night life activity in between, all paid for by me and the rest of Canada’s taxpaying public. A tough job indeed for you I know but hey, someone has to do it I suppose for the sake of the freedom and liberty of special interest groups here in Canada determined to duct-tape the mouths of its citizens into silence and submission to Israeli interests.

I am 62 years of age. I run a seasonal business doing carpentry that ends abruptly come freeze up in the fall and doesn’t begin again until well into May when the snows recedes. In other words for about 6 months of the year I must survive on the profits of about 5 months steady employment and then for the remainder of the winter survive on a $300/month early pension payment. It hardly leaves vast extraneous sums of cash for long distance travel, hotels, meals and possible mechanical failures, let alone the hiring of any legal help. But then you are likely already well aware of this fact so I suppose I’m merely repeating myself here.

So no, I’m going to have to decline your offer of going to Vancouver even though the escape from a frozen landscape for a day or two of temperate rainforest climate would otherwise be a welcome change from the ice and snow and wood splitting.

Furthermore, had I agreed to mediation it would have been on the condition that your Tribunal member and Harvey Smarba both make the trek up to the supposed ‘scene of the crime’ and that you hold your mediation and/or your hearing in Quesnel, B.C., a location both the closest and most convenient location for me. Never forget for a moment please that it was the complainant Harvey Smarba and The League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada who instigated these spurious charges to begin with. That, in my mind, makes him and his organization responsible for coming to where they believe the supposed ‘hate crime’ was committed and face, like decent men, their accused.

Surely you ought to be able to see the soundness of my proposal. Had the mediation occurred your Tribunal member would then have had to assume the additional burden of taking a small twin-engine jet service up to Quesnel and settle for a one to three day stay in one of our local hotels or motels; facilities which offer the weary traveler their own small but earnest effort at duplicating the finest of accommodations that Vancouver has to offer. I would also have suggested some good warm woolies and a toque and warm mittens for your member. Even fleece is acceptable in this sometimes rough and tumble area of the province inhabited mostly by red-neck ranchers, loggers, miners and other assorted misfits and outlaws`. You might also have had to let the member know that weather conditions could delay their flight in and out and that he or she should allow for a few days extra time in either arriving or leaving.

So you see that in fact there is a silver lining to it all. By not agreeing to mediation I will be saving Canadian taxpayers the additional expense of flying one of your members out to B.C. As well, it will save the complainant any added costs in traveling from Victoria to Vancouver and back.

As a final kick at the cat and as a parting tribute to Canada’s foremost political prisoner Ernst Zundel, I would like to share with you a short, yet poignant anecdote, one which relates to my own case and the decision I have made respecting the proposed mediation.

During the Moscow Show trials of Lenin and Stalin (which I’m sure you are all well versed in) and also during the trials of post-war Germans at Nuremberg, a prosecutorial ploy was invariably used to silence all debate and discussion that might include actual facts and verifiable proofs or truths that might have vindicated the testimony of the victims. It became know as the principle of ‘Manifest Obviousness’ and came in very handy during the show trials of German soldiers and civilians held responsible for alleged ‘war crimes’ and the alleged ‘holocaust’ of the ‘6 million’ Jews during the war. Whenever any counter evidence arose that in any way challenged the newly-coined allegations of ‘holocaust’ and ‘gas chambers’ and ‘war crimes’ the judge would resort to using the expression ‘Manifest Obviousness’ as the final counter to any argument that the court was unable to justify with verifiable evidence. In many ways it resembles the current ploy of the CHRC and its Investigators and Tribunal with their use of the term, ‘Hallmarks of Hate’ to lend official, legal credence to an unproven set of assumptions that possess no foundation in the real world. Therefore, in the spirit of Nuremberg I would have to state that it is manifestly obvious that all of your efforts to impose legal sanctions against Canadians based upon Section 13(1) of the CHR Act are unjustifiable and venal in the worse possible sense of the term. This therefore leaves no doubt in my mind that both the Canadian Human Rights Commission and the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal should be immediately relieved of any and all power to adjudicate any matter of Canadian jurisprudence whatsoever. I say this as a concerned Canadian, a Christian and a man of principle.

Let us therefore drop the pretension of justice and proceed to the next stage of this mock trial of a free and independent Canadian. On with the show! Let the Tribunal hearing begin! (But again, please bear in mind that I would expect you to hold it in Quesnel, B.C.)

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Shine your Light for Love & Peace & Justice for All,

Arthur Topham
The Radical Press
Canada’s Radical News Network
[email protected]
‘Digging to the root of the issues since 1998’

{ Comments are closed }

The Political Assassination of LaVoy Finicum by Dr. Anthony Hall


Hall’s Update: The Duff/Dean version to confuse my essay’s introduction is not consistent with Victoria Sharp’s eyewitness testimony given to North West Liberty News
[ Editor’s update: A witness that was stopped and arrested in the first car refutes the allegations made in this early reporting of an execution with his hands up in the air. Finicum had run the first road block, and was not fired upon, and crashed into a snowbank while trying to run the backup road block.
He exited the car and charged the officers and was shot then. This witness was at a distance himself but I suspect we will have video camera evidence of both stops as that is routine now in these situations where both parties want proof of what happened.
The rest of everyone stopped are alive. Those with warrants were arrested and the released. I am sure we will be hearing more about this in the next few days. For my two cents these folks should have been aware that some sort of arrest could be expected and should have had a game plan to move the dispute into the courts, as will happen now. Any kind of shooting served neither the government’s position nor those arrested, injured or killed. The legal process will not churn on it what will be a high profile case…Jim W. Dean ]
by Anthony Hall,Canada
According to a report on his own You Tube channel, LaVoy Finicum was killed on the evening of January 26, 2016 by a US special forces unit while the deceased Arizona rancher ‘was on his knees with his hands up.’
Finicum is said to have been shot ‘three times’ in an episode that also included the arrest on Highway 395 in Oregon of some of the leadership of the Citizens for Constitutional Freedom. Nevada Assembly woman Michele Fiore also reported in a tweet that Finicum was shot by federal authorities with his hands up.

In a more recent report, North West Liberty News published an interview with Victoria Sharp who was in the ‘ambushed’ car carrying the targeted entourage with LaVoy Finicum at the wheel. She said that Finicum was shot six extra times by special forces police after he was already downed by police gunfire.
Sharp confirmed that Finicum was initially shot outside the car with his hands in the air. She dismissed the story of three bullets being shot as bunk and indicated that at least 120 shots were fired at the car. She spoke of about 4o police vehicles being involved in the ambush with ‘FBI snippers’ posted
everywhere, including on perches in surrounding trees.
The group had left the camp of the armed protestors that took control of the federal building overseeing the Federal Malheur Wildlife Reservation. The entourage, including Ammon Bundy and Ryan Bundy who was wounded in the episode, was on their way to address a meeting in the Oregon community of John Day. Police reportedly apprehended a second group in an episode that at this moment remains ill defined.
Inevitably Finicum’s death will be viewed by many as a political assassination by a US federal government that has become accustomed to extrajudicial killing all over the world. A veteran of the controversial standoff at Cliven Bundy’s ranch in Nevada in 2014, Finicum was emerging as a compelling voice for a movement that some see as a patriotic defence of the rule of law in the United States. Where some see freedom fighters, others see droves of coddled terrorists cut way too much slack by the federal authorities.
A member of the Church of Jesus of Latter-day Saints who grew up on the Navajo Reservation in the Four Corners area of the American West, Finicum was fast acquiring prominence as a go-to person by journalists covering the evolving standoff. Again and again Finicum threw out sound bites addressing in an usually clear way major issues whose scope goes far beyond the immediate issues of federal regulation of ranchers on federal lands in the American West. Finicum made history, for instance, when he commented eloquently on his own filmed removal of a spy camera from a lamp post in the vicinity of the protest camp.
After coming down from the ladder with the spy camera in hand, Finicum fended off pressures from his fellow protesters to destroy the expensive spy device. He made a point of letting it be known the spy ware would be sent back to the appropriate authorities in Washington DC. The symbolic importance of this ritual on contested federal lands is obvious during an era when Edward Snowden must live in exile in Russia, ruthlessly criminalized for exposing the pervasive, permeating, privacy-obliterating illegality of the national security states quickly expanding apparatus for ‘Total Information Awareness.’
Confounding the ‘Progressive Left’s Stereotypes of Militia Members as Ignorant Red Neck Bigots
Most interesting to me was Finicum’s success in confounding the ‘progressive’ left’s stereotypes of of militia members as ignorant Red Neck bigots. Citing his experiences growing up on the Navajo Reservation, Finicum made it very clear he well understood that the federal Bureau of Indian Affairs applies to America’s Indian reservations many of the same repressive indignities visited on many non-Indian citizens by the Interior Department’s deeply corrupt and politicized Bureau of Land Management. The image cannot be easily brushed aside of LaVoy Finicum declaring days before his death, ‘The Native American People Need to Be Free…. The Tribes Need to Be Free.’
The symbolic sinew of Finicum’s outreach to the First Nations was his inspection of the deplorable conditions of the First Nations ‘artifacts’ being held in the dank basement in federal headquarters of the Malheur Wildlife Reservation. Finicum made it clear that the artifacts should be ‘returned to their rightful owners.’ Why should this collection of First Nations material culture be ‘locked away’ apart from the communities who properties they most genuinely are.
From these comments Finicum demonstrated his familiarity with the ‘repatriation’ discourse among First Nations people. As this discourse has unfolded, museums around the world have been returning to their true owners material items such as ceremonial pipes, implements and regalia. The giving back of these embodiments of distinct heritages and cultures of Indigenous peoples signifies respect for living societies trying to secure places in the future by claiming for their posterity the material evidence of their own histories.
Finicum repeatedly called for representatives of Native Americans to come forward to begin a dialogue transcending the Hollywoodized mythology of cowboys and Indians. Finicum’s apparent sensitivity to the need for dialogue with Native Americans was part of a plea to find common ground in order to host and support a rainbow confederacy of constituencies all imperilled by an out-of-control federal juggernaut menacing the entire global community in this era of never-ending 9/11 wars.
Finicum made a point of telling the cameras that he and those for whom he was speaking are not ‘anti-government.’ Rather it has been the failure of the federal authority to adhere to even its own laws that has made it necessary for the creation of a mass movement of citizens opposed to the imposition of various forms of tyranny from above. As Finicum declared in the hours before his death, ‘This is not just a little occupation. This is a mass movement involving tens of millions of people.’
In my estimation Finicum was way too conservative in assessing the true extent of those who have lost all confidence that the federal authority in the USA, or in my own country of Canada for that matter, has any chance of redemption under current conditions. Like some of the leading activists of the Occupy movement, Finicum seemed well aware of the reality that the federal government of the United States has been taken over by a tiny cabal perfectly prepared to advance its interests through fascism, genocide, eugenics, forced migrations, geoengineering and banking frauds.
This list of federal malevolence and malfeasance is far from complete. Under our current conditions only a popular mobilization on a massive scale, capable of transcending many different types of divide and conquer tactics, has a chance of holding back the onslaught. This onslaught of debt enslavement, militarization and environmental holocaust is being forced upon us by an extremely elaborate, old and well organized criminal gang that has rendered the federal authority of the world’s ailing superpower as a blunt weapon exclusively available for its own disposal.
Assassination or Suicide?
LaVoy Finicum& wife Jeannette
Finicum’s death is already raising bitter controversies even before his body is buried. SeniorVeterans Today Editor, Gordon Duff, has already suggested Finicum’s killing by federal bullets amounted to ‘suicide by cop.’ This characterization of Finicum’s death introduces a meme that will probably reverberate across media venues of the controlled opposition. It is true that Finicum spoke openly about his unwillingness to be incarcerated in ‘a concrete box.’ Going from there to making Finicum the author of his own death, however, is a huge leap for the veteran special forces expert to make. Such a judgement, while the body is literally still warm, raises the ante of interpretation concerning the death of a person who will almost certainly be regarded as a martyr taken down in defence of a higher ideal.
Cliven Bundy, the Nevada-based patriarch of the US movement of which Finicum was a part, left no doubt of where he stands on the federal killing. The owner of the Nevada ranch at the eye of the conflict with the Bureau of Land Management in 2014 asserted, ‘It appears that America was fired upon by our government. One of liberties finest patriots is fallen… We’ve got one killed and I can say he was sacrificed for a good purpose.’
The killing is throwing up huge controversies for the USA’s Utah-headquartered Mormon Church that has many of its members involved in various capacities with the libertarian militia movement. How will this rich and successful religious denomination respond? In this election year, how will many right-wing politicians, including Donald Trump, respond to the death of such an iconographic family man, the natural and foster patriarch of a large extended mormon clan? Is Mitt Romney or LaVoy Finicum a better embodiment of Mormon family values, of idealized patriotism growing out of love of country?
Mormon broadcaster Jake Morphonios has already disagreed with the Church establishment’s ruling that the Citizens for Constitutional Freedom are operating outside acceptable Mormon behaviour. For Morphonios, the CCF was engaged in the Nevada and Oregon standoffs in ‘a legitimate self-defence against an aggressive and abusive bureaucracy that is far outside the rule of law.’
Paul Craig Roberts versus Russia Today
Another emerging controversy over the meaning of Finicum’s death was foreshadowed in disagreement between conservative American pundit, Paul Craig Roberts, and Russia Today. Emphasizing, for instance, the huge implications of the 9/11 false flag event, Israeli domination of US foreign policy, and the undermining of America’s worldwide interests by a kleptocratic banking cabal based on Wall Street and the City of London, Roberts welcomed the militia stand in Oregon as a part of a necessary resistance to the grotesque neocon abuse of federal power.
Roberts criticized Russia Today for looking away from this larger picture and emphasizing instead the disparity of police treatment between the public demonstration by the protestors at the Black Lives Matter demonstration in Ferguson Missouri and the arms bearing ‘ranchers’ who have gathered at the Malheur Wildlife Reservation. While the racism of the US police state was certainly a factor in the contrast, Roberts pointed out how this slant in coverage plays right into the divide-and-conquer agenda of the likes of American plutocrat George Soros.
It is well known that Soros funds the completely compromised and ineffective so-called ‘peace’ movement. Multi-billionaire Soros also funded the so-called colour revolutions that laid the foundations for the Ukranian-Russian divisions presently pushed and exploited by NATO. It is less well known that Soros is also busily funding the Black Lives Matter movement. It seems that all is well with the dominant global cabal of organized crime as long as potential opponents of their bought-and-paid-for devices of pseudo-democratic government are sliced and diced into as many isolated fragments as possible.
Militia Fanatics or Average Americans Standing Up to Fascism?
Gordon Duff is utterly contemptuous of the ‘Bundy/Oregon militia,’ alleging that its members are subject to a plague of ‘race hatred, religious extremism and tasteless ignorance.’ No doubt the group Duff thus dismisses does have some factions and members that display some of these symptoms of extremism in varying degrees. How could it be otherwise in an American failed state permeated with racism, religious extremism, and forms of ignorance that are aggressively and insidiously promoted by a media culture that profits hugely from the dissemination of disinformation and round-the-clock PR bullshit.
But who of us is without sin? What religious extremist was it that said something like, ‘let he who is without sin cast the first stone?’ Are we only
Gordon Duff Being Interviewed on Kevin Barrett’s Truthjihad
qualified to work for revolutionary transformation of our present intolerable conditions when we follow Gordon Duff’s lead in rising above all the foibles and weaknesses inherent in the societies around us?
Part of Duff’s criticism is based on probably-true accusations that the group in and around the Wildlife Reservation protest camp is riddled with undercover federal agents. This observation itself, however, should speak to the covert thuggery of a federal authority that has removed from the vast majority of citizens the protections of social security and the rule of law including due process for the redress of grievances. The domestic and international versions of the national security state are all in place, at huge expense to us, so that no true movement for genuine redress can even get off the ground before the instruments of Full Spectrum Dominance kick in.
The name Pete Santilli seems to come up often when possible undercover agents are mentioned in this context. Santilli is the You Tube-making blogger of the protest camp who was apparently among those arrested. One could observe the great gulf between the positions of Santilli and of LaVoy Finicum. Shortly before his death Finicum vowed that the federal building on the Wildlife Reservation will never be returned to Washington. He spoke of it being handed over instead to the local Harney County government.
This statement of intent contrasts dramatically with a You Tube of Santilli at the height of the crisis driving along somewhere in Oregon looking from time to time into the camera. He speaks into the recording device advising the FBI to hold back from attacking the protest camp said to be full of women and children. A female voice in the car echoes this caution. As justification for this advise, Santilli declares his intent to go to the camp and clear it out of inhabitants.
Finicum himself described the build up of spy planes and spy drones over the camp in the hours before the mobilization of federal actions that led to his death. He anticipated ‘kinetic action’ on the part of the feds stating, ‘I have no intention of spending my days in a concrete box. There are things more important than your life and freedom is one of them.’
‘Helpingmind,’ the nom de plume of one the commentators on Duff’s Veterans Today article observed, ‘Militia my ass. They are mostly average Americans who know we are very close to fascism via false flag reaction psychosis around the world… The core group is mirrored by 10s of millions in America alone and their take on the entity in DC is that it is a fascist immoral ‘criminal mob’—- Your words Mr. Duff’

{ Comments are closed }

The Case Against Noahide Law


ED Noor: Americans in their current Islamophobic fervor seem to be terrified of the imposition of Shariah Law upon the nation. They are completely unaware that their nation has already been sold over and that their American legal system has been hijacked by the Talmudics and that their once Napoleonic judicial system has been altered into a truly ‘jewdicial system’.
‘On October 16th [2004], president Bush signed into law the global anti-semitism review act, designed to force the entire world into never being critical of the Jews, whatever their actions.
‘This act establishes a special department within the United States state department to monitor global anti-semitism, which is to report annually to congress.
‘This act defines a person as being anti-semitic if they purport any of the following beliefs:
~ Any assertion, ‘that the Jewish community controls government, the media, international business and the financial world.’
~ The expression of, ‘strong anti-Israel sentiment.’
~ Expressing, ‘virulent criticism,’ of Israel’s leaders, past or present. The state department gives an example of this occurring when a swastika is portrayed in a cartoon decrying the behaviour of a past or present Zionist leader.
~ Any criticism of the Jewish religion or its religious leaders or literature with the emphasis on the Talmud and Kabbalah.
~ Any criticism of the United States government and congress for being under undue influence by the Jewish Zionist community, which would include Jewish organisations such as American-Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC).
~ Any criticism of the Jewish-Zionist community for promoting globalism or what some call the, ‘New World Order.’
~ Placing any blame on Jewish leaders and their followers for inciting the Roman crucifixion of Christ.
~ Citing any facts that could in any way diminish the, ‘six million,’ figure of holocaust victims.
~ Claiming that Israel is a racist state.
~ Making any claim that there exists a, ‘Zionist conspiracy.’
~ Offering proof that Jews and their leaders created communism and the bolshevik revolution in Russia.
~ Making, ‘derogatory statements about Jewish persons.’
~ Asserting that spiritually disobedient Jews do not have the biblical right to re-occupy Palestine.
~ Making any allegations of Mossad involvement in the 9/11 attack.
And now, let us get into the nitty gritty of the Noahide Laws, something this blog has been exposing for several years now.
‘All Israelites will have a part in the future world. The Goyim, at the end of the world will be handed over to the angel Duma and sent down to hell’. ~ Zohar, Shemoth, Toldoth Noah, Lekh-Lekha .
Public Law 102-14 is an American Federal law which states that the ‘Seven Noahide Laws’ (Jewish Laws from the Talmud) are the principle on which the United States was founded and that it is the responsibility of America to transmit these ‘ethical values’ to future generation both in the United States and the world. But what are these so-called ‘ethical values’ known as the ‘Seven Noahide Laws’ and what implications do they have for non-Jews?
Public Law 102-14 not only states that the Seven Noahide Laws are the principles upon which the American Nation was founded, it also honors Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson of the Lubavitch Movement (also known as Chabad) as being a ‘great spiritual leader’. According to Rabbi Schneerson, the Noahide Laws are to be kept by force if possible and if not by ‘pleasantness and peace’. This same Rabbi also stated that non-Jews are inferior to Jews, saying that they have ‘satanic souls’ and their lives are worth nothing except as service to Jews. Why would the USA honor such a Rabbi who preaches the most militant form of Noahide Law and who obviously hates non-Jews?
ED Noor: ‘It is our duty to force all mankind to accept the seven Noahide laws, and if not ~ they will be killed.’ ~ Rabbi Yitzhak Ginsburg
After learning about Public Law 102-14 and the Noahide Laws, discriminatory Jewish religious laws which threaten freedom of religion, freedom of speech and sexual expression in the United States and the world, we wanted to learn a little more about modern Jewish opinion on this matter. We are fortunate because in 2008 a book on Noahide Law was published in Jerusalem entitled ‘The Divine Code’. Better still, the book was reviewed by the Chief Rabbinate of Israel. Let’s see what ‘The Divine Code’ and the Chief Rabbis have to say about Noahide Law.
American Public Law 102-14 enshrines the ‘Seven Noahide Laws’ as the ‘ethical values’ upon which the United States was founded. The law also asserts that it is the nation’s ‘responsibility’ to transmit these ‘ethical values’ to the generations of the future. We read in the 1906 Jewish Encyclopedia that under these laws, those who practice other faiths, blaspheme against Judaism or commit ‘adultery’ are to be punished by death and that non-Jews are commanded to set up ‘courts of justice’ to judge the masses upon these laws. It would also seem that the Chief Rabbis of Israel also support the Noahide Laws being commanded upon non-Jews from their blessings upon the 2008 book ‘The Divine Code‘. But where did these ideas about Noahide Law come from? Noahide Law is not some bizarre aberration of Judaism, it is fundamental and central to Jewish cannon. In which Jewish holy book can we find the Noahide Laws? To answer these questions, we need to learn a little about the most important of all Jewish scriptures, The Babylonian Talmud.
Many American find it hard to believe that congress would pass Public Law 102-14 (The Noahide Laws) if they were truly detrimental to the freedoms of non-Jews. Aren’t most people in congress non-Jewish? Why would they pass a law that was against their own interests? According to former congressman Bill Dannemyer (this is not an endorsement of him), Public Law 102-14 was passed on the vote of only four congressmen, when 99% of congress was absent. If his testimony and the testimony of his wife Dr. Day (again, not an endorsement) are accurate, then 99% of congress never voted on Public Law 102-14. Why was such an important proclamation passed with the consent of only 1% of congress?
ED Noor: By Congressman Dannemyer serving at the time. An excellent read. Basically they passed this using the same conniving methods they utilized when signing the Federal Reserve Act back in 1903.
Ever since the Jewish Talmudic Noahide Laws were introduced into the American legal system back in 1991, some members of the Jewish legal community have been using deceptive practices and outright lies to introduce Jewish Talmudic Laws into the Supreme Court, particularly in the area of capital punishment and execution law. Execution is a legal issue of importance to those seeking to implement Noahide Law in the United States since Noahide Law calls for the decapitation of anyone who practices ‘idolatry’ (which includes Christianity) or blasphemes the Jewish god. Here we will briefly discuss which organizations are infiltrating the Supreme Court, preparing it for the acceptance of Talmudic Law and how they are deceiving the public into accepting Talmudic execution laws (particularly decapitation) in the United States.
ED Noor: Bush Jr. Signing this infamous duplicitous law which had nothing to do with education and everything to do with signing in the Rebbe’s dream of establishing the Noahide Laws in America.
This photo provided by the Supreme Court shows President Bush, left, meeting with members of the Supreme Court during the investiture ceremony of Chief Justice John Roberts, second from right, in the Chief Justice’s Conference Room at the court in Washington, Monday, Oct. 3, 2005. From left are, the president, Justices John Paul Stevens, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, David Souter, Antonin Scalia, Roberts, and Justice Sandra Day O’Connor. (AP Photo/Ken Heinen, Pool)
This photo provided by the Supreme Court shows President Bush, left, meeting with members of the Supreme Court during the investiture ceremony of Chief Justice John Roberts, second from right, in the Chief Justice’s Conference Room at the court in Washington, Monday, Oct. 3, 2005. From left are, the president, Justices John Paul Stevens, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, David Souter, Antonin Scalia, Roberts, and Justice Sandra Day O’Connor. (AP Photo/Ken Heinen, Pool)
The Jews of America and Zionist Israel have not been satisfied with simply enshrining their supremacist, virulent and dangerous Noahide Laws into the United States government via Public Law 102-14. They have been working steadily to further encroach their Talmudic hegemony into the US, and they have won over our Presidents and Supreme Court Justices.
On November 5th, 2002 a Kosher dinner was held at the Supreme Court to celebrate the launch of the International Institute for Judaic Law (IIJL) [currently defunct]. This kosher dinner was attended by three of the Supreme Court Justice, Ruth Bader Ginsberg, Stephen Breyer, and Antonin Scalia, some of whom provided their letters of approval to the founder of the institute, Chabad-Lubavitch Rabbi Dr. Noson Gurary. President George W. Bush also sent his greetings and approval for the institute and Jewish Law.
One of the stated purposes of IIJL was to promote the application of Jewish Law and Philosophy in contemporary society. The Jewish Noahide Laws and Philosophy of the Talmud are inherently biased against non-Jews, promoting their general second-class citizenship and even extermination, so why is the President of the USA and Supreme Court giving credence to such an Jewish supremacist legal system?
When Americans learn about Public Law 102-14 and the Noahide Laws, many are quick to dismiss the threat because ‘Israel is a secular nation’ and would never push for religious laws… how far this is from the truth!
Today, Jews and their supporters drum the misconception that Israel is a ‘secular sate’. Israel is a ‘Jewish sate’, a Zionist state, a religious state and this is very obvious from Israel’s legal system. The nation of Israel has no constitution, on purpose, because this would force the nation to choose between ‘secularism’ and halacha (Jewish Law). Israel does however have state appointed and funded Rabbis and Rabbinical Courts. The Rabbis of Israel have gained control of and have implemented religious law in the sectors of marriage, divorce and adoption and are seeking to develop greater influence over the nation’s military and education sectors. A nation which does not have a constitution of secularism but does have state religious figures with legal powers is not a ‘secular state’; it is a pseudo-theocracy at best. Surprisingly, recent polls have suggested that support for Halacha law over democracy is very high within the nation of Israel.
When criticizing the international Jewish legal system known as Noahide Law (Public Law 102-14 in America), one is often accused of being ‘anti-Semitic’. To call someone an ‘anti-Semite’ implies they have issues with ‘Semitic’ people, and thus you are equating them with being something akin to a racist. It can be stated that Noahide Law is just that, a law, and so opposing this law is no less ‘racist’ than opposing Islamic Sharia law or Communism. A legal text is not a group or people, it is not an ethnicity, and it is not a race, so to oppose it cannot be ‘anti-Semitic’. However, there is a deeper question that needs to be answered here, are Jew’s really a race or ethnicity? When we look at modern laws in Israel, Jewish theology, and claims by modern Jewish geneticists, we can see that Judaism has been conflated with ‘Semitism’, they are not the same thing.
Criticism of Noahide Law and Judaism in general has nothing to do with hatred for any race or ethnicity, it has to do with opposing deleterious ideology, nothing more, nothing less.
When many Christian learn about Noahide Law and the Talmud, they wrongly believe that the injunctions against ‘heathens’ do not apply to them. Little do Christians know that according to Jewish Law, to be Christian is worse than being a ‘heathen’ since Christians are considered ‘heretics’ and ‘apostates’. Indeed, according to the Talmud, becoming Christian is one of the worst sins one can commit, and Jesus himself is harshly admonished for being a sorcerer, blasphemer and a whore monger.
ED Noor: The seven Noahide laws, as traditionally enumerated are:
Do Not Deny God
Do Not Blaspheme God
Do Not Murder
Do Not Engage in Incestuous, Adulterous or Homosexual Relationships
Do Not Steal
Do Not Eat of a Live Animal
Establish Courts/Legal System to Ensure Law Obedience
Should the LGBTQ community be worried about Public Law 102-14 and the Jewish Noahide Laws? Absolutely. According to traditional interpretations of Noahide Law, the law against ‘adultery’ includes homosexuality, and like adulterers, homosexuals would be killed under Noahide Law. The Talmud is full of commands to kill homosexuals, classing them with persons who have sex with animals.
Non-Jews accused of homosexuality could be executed at any time in a Noahide court upon the testimony of one witness and upon the verdict of just one judge; Jews on the other hand would need two witnesses to their ‘crime’ of homosexuality and could not be executed unless they were brought before a panel of 71 judges (the Sanhedrin). Further, some Rabbis of the Talmud make prejudicial assumptions, stating that Jews are generally not thought to practice homosexuality, thus providing Jews with a biased favor before the court. Talmudic Law obviously has an inherent bias against non-Jews who have been accused of this so-called ‘sin’ and non-Jewish LGBTQs are obviously in greater danger of persecution under Noahide Law than Jewish LGBTQs.
Adultery is a ‘crime’ under Jewish Noahide Law, one for which non-Jews are to be decapitated. But what is the Jewish definition of adultery? Many might be surprised to learn that under usual circumstance, only a woman can be accused of adultery under Jewish Law, while Jewish men are free to engage in extramarital sex and keep sex slaves, even having sex with non-Jewish infants as young as three years old.
Meanwhile, woman only accused of adultery were stripped naked and put on public display during the Talmudic times. Are these the type of ‘morals’ we want in the USA (Public Law 102-14) or around the world? While many will point to the fact that such practices are not taking place today, according to Halachic material, this is only because current Israeli society has been corrupted by foreign influence (as during Roman times), something that Noahide advocates are working to correct.
One of the Seven Noahide Laws is ‘do not murder’; who could disagree with that? Well, it depends on your definition of murder. According to the Jewish Law of the Talmud, there is no penalty for killing a person indirectly, thus Jewish law provides provisions for killing others (even other Jews) via starvation, exposure, suffocation, and more. But, this principle only applies to Jews. Non-Jews who commit these same crimes are sentenced to death. Noahide Law (Public Law 102-14) is inherently biased in favor of Jews, and resembles nothing close to what would be considered common morality or ethics.
ED Noor: Read about The King’s Torah, a modern Israeli publication by several prominent rabbis.
One of the Seven Noahide Laws from the Jewish Talmud is ‘Do Not Steal’. That sounds pretty reasonable right? But did you know that according to the Talmud Jews are given full permission to steal from non-Jews? And don’t forget, Jews are not prosecuted for stealing small amounts of money, but non-Jews are.
Members of the modern Sanhedrin in Israel.
The seventh and final law of the Seven Noahide Laws (Public Law 102-14) is to ‘appoint courts of justice’. But what kind of American courts would uphold Jewish law? According to the reputable Jewish legal source, the Mishneh Torah (aka Rambam) written by the famous Jewish scholar Maimonides, non-Jews are to set up ‘theocratic courts’ whose judges are learned in ‘Torah’ and who do no ‘pervert’ the law with secular logic.
Non-Jews who fail to set up theocratic Jewish courts in their nations are subjected to mass execution. If this were not enough, it may (or may not) be required for non-Jews to appoint theocratic kings among themselves who will ensure that the nation is upholding Noahide Law. The United States was founded upon the principle of separation of Church and State, so what is such a law as Public Law 102-14 doing in our federal legal system?
The very first of The Seven Jewish Noahide Laws (American Public Law 102-14) is ‘No Idolatry’. Well most people don’t bow before graven images, so does it really matter if such practices are outlawed? ‘Idolatry’ under Jewish Noahide Law encompasses much much more than simply banning people from bowing before statues.
According to Jewish legal scholars, to avoid ‘idolatry’, one must:
~ accept Jewish Torah;
~ accept Jewish prophets and teachers;
~ and give obedience to Jewish courts.
~ Also, one must not accept non-Jewish scriptures;
~ not follow non-Jewish prophets or priests.
All non-Jewish religious temples and paraphernalia are to be destroyed and any attempts to proselytize a non-Jewish religion will lead to execution. In addition, under the Noahide Law which abolishes ‘idolatry’, non-Jews can be executed for doing something as simple as consulting astrologers or getting a tattoo. Finally, non-Jews are commanded to not love those who practice idolatry and to even hate them.
ED Noor: ‘MAY’ have racist UNDERtones!? See images above.
Public Law 102-14 in the United States and the Jewish Noahide Laws are of concern to all non-Jews. The Noahide Laws are rules created by Jews for non-Jews, and these rules relegate us to a 2nd class status. But there are layers to this 2nd class citizenship for non-Jews under Jewish Talmudic law.
Did you know that according to the Talmud, the same book which gives us the Noahide Laws, that African people are considered to be cursed? That’s right, according to the Talmud the ‘negro’ race was produced through a curse on Noah’s son Ham. Since it is the Talmud which informs Noahide Law in general, and it is from Jewish Talmudists that we are informed on the laws, it is certainly possible that some of this Talmudic racism could bleed through, infecting the already nefarious Noahide Laws with a new layer of hate, anti-African racism. Anti-African racism in Israel might be a good indicator for the temper in which Rabbis might promote the Noahide Law among non-Jews.
When speaking about Noahide Law with either Jews or Noahides, sometimes a person who is either misinformed or even willingly trying to deceive you will proclaim that there is no reason to worry about Noahide Law since according to Jewish theology, no ‘Ger Toshav’ can be accepted at this time. According to Jewish Law, a ‘Ger Toshav’ can only be accepted during a time when the nation of Israel has instated a holiday called the Jubilee, and the modern nation of Israel has not done this. However, this logic is deceptive, since the speaker is either accidentally or intentionally conflating a ‘Noahide’ with a ‘Ger Toshav’, they are not the same thing!

‘Happy will be the lost of Israel, whom the Holy One, blessed be He, has chosen from amongst the Goyim, of whom the Scriptures say: ’Their work is but vanity, it is an illusion at which we must laugh, they will all perish when God visits them in His wrath.’ At the moment when the Holy One, blessed be He, will exterminate all the Goyim of the world, Israel alone will subsist, even as it is written: ‘‘The Lord alone will appear great on that day! …’’ ~ Zohar, Vayshlah 177b
‘It is the law to kill anyone who denies the Torah. The Christians belong to the denying ones of the Torah.’ ~ Coschen hamischpat 425 Hagah 425. 5
‘Although the non-Jew has the same body structure as the Jew, they compare with the Jew like a monkey to a human.’ ~ Schene luchoth haberith, p. 250 b
Rosh Hashanah 17a. Christians (minnim) and others who reject the Talmud will go to hell and be punished there for all generations.
Minor Tractates. Soferim 15, Rule 10. This is the saying of Rabbi Simon ben Yohai: Tob shebe goyyim harog ~‘Even the best of the gentiles should all be killed’.
Filed Under: Noahide Law, Noor al-Haqiqa, Snippits and Snappits
Glenn Shumway says:
January 19, 2016 at 10:06 pm
The Truth about the ‘Noahide Laws’…
NOTE: This article is published anonymously, the authors having previously received anonymous death threats over the phone for publishing similar opinions. Permission is hereby granted to any and all who would re-publish it to do so. The electronic format is graphic PDF so that the content may not be easily altered.
Background . . .
The so-called ‘Noahide’ laws appear nowhere in the written Hebrew Tanakh (what Christians condescendingly call the ‘Old Testament’). They do appear, in great detail, in the Jewish Talmud.
The Talmud is today’s ‘print version’ of what was originally an ‘oral tradition’ of the Pharisees and Sadducees in Yeshua’s time, what he chastised them for as obeying the ‘commandments/doctrines of men’, or ‘traditions of men’, instead of the written Torah of YHVH. (Isaiah 29:13; Mark 7:7) The Talmud represents the ultimate Satanic corruption of what YHVH intended Judaism to be, and as He explained in crystal clear detail to the assembled children of Israel at Mt. Sinai.
The identical corruption has derailed much of ‘Christianity’ through the deceptions of the Roman Catholic Church and all of her daughter whores (Revelation 17:5), the so-called ‘Protestant’ denominations. This common corruption is a manifestation of ‘Mystery Babylon’, the name of Satan’s worldwide spiritual kingdom on the earth (2 Corinthians 4:4), and it is from the period of the Jews’ captivity in physical Babylon that the Talmud admittedly springs. And it has effectively replaced the written Torah of Moses in the lives of most who call themselves ‘Jews’.
The Talmud: Heart’s Blood of the Jewish Faith, was the heading of the 11/17/1959 installment of ‘This Is My God’, a bestseller book by author Herman Wouk (The Caine Mutiny, Marjorie Morningstar, The Winds of War, Youngblood Hawke, Please Don’t Stop the Carnival) which ran serially in the New York Herald-Tribune. To quote:
‘The TALMUD is to this day the circulating heart’s blood of the Jewish religion. Whatever laws, customs or ceremonies we observe whether we are orthodox, Conservative, Reform or merely spasmodic sentimentalists-we follow the TALMUD.
It is our common law.’
[Remember this?Christians.]
The Noahide laws appear as such only in the Talmud, which is the so-called ‘holy book’ used by the overwhelming majority of Jewish rabbis today, in the same way that Christians use the entire Bible. The problem with this is that the Talmud is nothing but a collection of the 100% human opinions of rabbis concerning the Law (Torah), the Prophets (Nevi’im) and the Writings (Ketuvim) and the myriad convoluted ways they have contrived to avoid obeying the written Torah of YHVH.
And no wonder, seeing that the Tanakh (Christian ‘Old Testament’) is mostly a running commentary on YHVH Elohim’s opinion of the ancestors of the Jews and how their continuing idolatries have absolved Him of any responsibility to keep His conditional covenants with the people of Israel as a race. Nevertheless, He has promised to keep His covenant with ‘the children of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob’, but only with a righteous remnant of that group.
‘And at that time shall Michael stand up, the great prince who stands for the children of your people: and there shall be a time of trouble, such as never was since there was a nation until that same time: and at that time your people shall be delivered, every one that shall be found written in the book.’ [Daniel 12:1]
There is only one ‘the book’ which has to do with salvation, and that is the Lamb’s Book of Life (Revelation 21:27). Having one’s name in it is a matter of one’s personal righteousness before the God of the Bible, and no one who considers the Talmud as good for anything has any chance at that status, as we will show. The Talmud contains some of the most virulent hate literature ever written, plus every manner of obscenity and rabbinical permission to Jews to commit unlimited atrocities against Gentiles, simply because they believe themselves to be ‘the chosen people’ of YHVH, no matter what they do, and all in direct contravention of what our Lord Yeshua called ‘the Law and the Prophets’!
It is impossible for any truly begotten-again disciple of Yeshua of Nazareth to also ‘be’ a Noahide, since the Talmudic ‘Jews’ believe today, as they did in Yeshua’s day, that Yeshua haMaschiach was a false Messiah, and reverence of him AS the Promised One to be a sin worthy of death. Therefore, the ‘Noahide laws’ are actually nothing more than a thinly-veiled Jewish ruse to try to deceive Christians into believing that they can somehow be ‘reconciled’ to rabbinic Judaism. All one has to do to be accepted by the rabbis is agree to abandon whatever religious beliefs and practices they may have been observing, such as Christianity, and follow the ‘Noahide Laws’ instead. Simple, no?
No. Under rabbinic Jewish halakha law, the penalty for a Gentile’s (non-Jew’s) failure to do so is decapitation, and that sentence may be carried out based on the unsupported accusation of but a single Jew, which is itself a violation of the written Torah. (Deuteronomy 17:6)
Much of the Talmud is virulently anti-Gentile, and especially anti-Christian. Here are a few sample quotes from the Talmud (English Soncino Edition):
1. ‘The teachings of the Talmud stand above all other laws. They are more important than the laws of Moses.’ -Rabbi Issael, Rabbi Chasbar, et. al.
2. ‘The decisions of the Talmud are words of the living God. God Himself asks the opinion of the earthly rabbis when there are difficult affairs in heaven.’ -Rabbi Menechen Commentary on Fifth Book
3. ‘God Himself studies the Talmud standing, he has such respect for that book.’ -Tract Mechillo
4. ‘It is more wicked to question the words of the rabbis than those of the Torah.’ -Mischna Sanhedryn 11:3
5. ‘It is forbidden to disclose the secrets of the oral law. He who would do it would be as guilty as though he destroyed the whole world.’ -Jektat Chadasz, 171, 3
6. ‘Every non-Jew who studies the Talmud and every Jew who helps him in it, ought to die.’ -Sanhedryn, 59a, Aboda Zarah 8-6, Szagiga 13
7. ‘To communicate anything to a non-Jew about our religious relations would be equal to the killing of all Jews, for if the non-Jew knew what we teach about them they would kill us openly.’ -Libbre David 37
8. ‘If a Jew be called upon to explain any part of the rabbinic books, he ought to give only a false explanation. Who ever will violate this order shall be put to death.’ -Libbre David 37
9. ‘A Jew should and must make a false oath when the non-Jew asks if our books contain anything against them.’ -Szaaloth-Utszabot, The Book of Jore 17
10. ‘The Jews are human beings, but the nations of the world are not human beings but beasts…’ -Saba Mecia 114, 6
11. ‘When the Messiah comes every Jew will have 2800 slaves.’ -Simeon Haddarsen, fol. 56-D
12. ‘God created the non-Jew in human form so that the Jew would not have to be served by beasts. The non-Jew is consequently an animal in human form, and condemned to serve the Jew day and night.’ -Midrasch Talpioth, p. 225-L
13. ‘As soon as the King Messiah will declare himself, He will destroy Rome and make a wilderness of it. Thorns and weeds will grow in the Pope’s palace. Then He will start a merciless war on non-Jews and will overpower them. He will slay them in masses, kill their kings and lay waste the whole Roman land. He will say to the Jews: ‘I am the King Messiah for whom you have been waiting. Take the silver and gold from the non-Jew.’ ’ -Josiah 60, 6. Rabbi Abarbanel to Daniel 7, 13
14. ‘A Gentile girl who is three years old can be sexually violated.’ Aboda Zarah 37a
15. ‘A Jew may violate but not marry a non-Jewish girl.’ -&ad. Shas. 2:2
16. ‘A Jew may do to a non-Jewess what he can do. He may treat her as he treats a piece of meat.’ -Hadarine, 20, B; Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 348
17. ‘A Jew may misuse the non-Jewess in her state of unbelief.’ -Maimonides, Jak. Chasaka 2:2
18. ‘If a non-Jew kills a non-Jew or a Jew he is responsible; but if a Jew kills a non-Jew he is NOT responsible.’ -Tosefta Aboda 8, 5
19. ‘It is permitted to kill a Jewish denunciator everywhere. It is permitted to kill him even before he denounces.’ -Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 348
20. ‘Thou shalt not do injury to thy neighbor, but it is not said, ‘Thou shalt not do injury to a non-Jew.’ ’ -Mishna Sanhedryn 57
21. ‘When you go to war do not go as the first, but as the last, so that you may return as the first. Five things has Canaan [the Jew living in a Gentile society] recommended to his sons: ‘Love each other, love robbery, hate your masters and never tell the truth.’ ’ -Pesachis F. 113B
22. ‘A Jew is permitted to rape, cheat and perjure himself; but he must take care that he is not found out, so that Israel may not suffer.’ -Schulchan Aruch, Iore Dia
23. ‘A Jew may rob a non-Jew that is, he may cheat him in a bill, if unlikely to be perceived by him.’ -Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 348
24. ‘If a non-Jew wants a Jew to stand witness against a Jew in a Court of Law, and if the Jew could give fair evidence, he is forbidden to do it; but if a Jew wants a Jew to be a witness in a similar case against a non-Jew, he may do it.’ -Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 28, Art. 3 and 4
25. ‘Those who do not confess the Torah and the Prophets must be killed. Who has the power to kill them, let them kill them openly with the sword. if not, let them use artifices, till they are done away with.’ -Schulchan Aruch. Choszen Hamiszpat 425.5
26. ‘All property of other nations belongs to the Jewish nation, which, consequently, is entitled to seize upon it without any scruples. An orthodox Jew is not bound to observe principles of morality towards people of other tribes. He may act contrary to morality, if profitable to himself or to Jews in general’ ’ -Schulchan Aruch. Choszen Hamiszpat 348
27. ‘Should a Jew inform the non-Jewish authorities that another Jew has much money, and the other will suffer a loss through it, he must give him emuneration.’ -Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 388
28. ‘How to interpret the word ‘robbery.’ A non-Jew is forbidden to steal, rob, or take women slaves, etc., from a non-Jew or from a Jew. But a Jew is NOT forbidden to do all this to a non-Jew.’ -Tosefta, Aboda Zara, 5
29. ‘On the house of the non-Jew one looks as on the fold of cattle.’ -Tosefta, Erebin, 1
30. ‘All vows, oaths, promises, engagements, and swearing, which, beginning this very day or reconciliation till the next day of reconciliation, we intend to vow, promise, swear, and bind ourselves to fulfill, we repent of beforehand; let them be illegalized, acquitted, annihilated, abolished, valueless, unimportant. Our vows shall be no vows, and our oaths no oaths at all.’ -Schulchan Aruch, Edit. 1, 136. The Jewish Kol Nidre ‘All Vows’ Oath has been set to a morbid Jewish music, and is often heard on the radio. It is sung as a chant at each Yom Kippur (Jewish New Year service). [[ Most importantly, we ask why anyone who professes to be a rabbinic Jew of any sort should be elected to any public office, or promoted to any executive position, since their ‘religion’ requires them to take FALSE OATHS, and to LIE whenever it is in the interests of ‘Judaism’ for them to do so! WHY?]]
31. ‘Everything a Jew needs for his church ritual no non-Jew is permitted to manufacture, but only a Jew, because this must be manufactured by human beings and the Jew is not permitted to consider the non-Jew as human beings.’ -Schulchan Aruch, Aruch Chaim 14, 20, 32, 33, 39. Talmud Jebamoth 61
32. ‘A Jewish mid-wife is not only permitted but she is compelled to help a Jewish mother on Saturday (Jewish Sabbath) and when so doing to do anything which otherwise would desecrate the Saturday. But it is forbidden to help a non-Jewish woman even if it should be possible to help her without desecrating the Saturday, because she is to be considered only as an animal.’ -Schulchan Aruch, Aruch Chaim 330
33. ‘At the time of the Cholhamoed the transaction of any kind of business is forbidden. But it is permitted to cheat a non-Jew, because cheating of non-Jew at any time pleases the Lord.’ -Schulchan Aruch, Aruch Chaim 539
34. ‘The Jews are strictly forbidden to cheat their brothers and it is considered cheating already if one-sixth of the value has been taken away from him. Whoever has cheated his brother has to return it to him. Naturally all that only holds towards the Jew, to cheat a non-Jew is permitted and he is not permitted to return to him what he cheated him out of. Because the Bible says: ‘Thou shalt not cheat thy next brother,’ but the non-Jews are not our brethren, but as mentioned above, worse than dogs.’ -Baruch Choszen Hamiszpat 227
We realize that this is hard to believe, so we urge the reader to do some research on your own. A simple internet search on ‘Talmud’ will turn up any number of sites devoted to exposing this ‘holy book’ of the Jews for what it really is: racist hate literature.
More Jewish Propaganda . . .
Certain Jews today continually use such religious and impressive sounding words as ‘the Jewish faith,’ ‘the Jewish people/religion/race,’ ‘Jewish spiritual values,’ ‘Jewish religious doctrines,’ and the like, which are designed to deceive and lead the ignorant into mindless compliance with their plans. Behind this mask of contrived pseudo-religiosity stands a complete plan for world government, world power, world conquest, a Jewish kingdom of this world, the total destruction of Christianity and all true believers right along with it. It is the meat and substance of Hassidic Jewry, which is Pharisaic Talmudism, and ultimately, Pre-Millennial (prior to Messiah’s return) Zionism.
‘Jewish Talmudism owes its existence today to the indifference with which it is regarded by the Christian community. The Jew is prejudiced against the Bible, doing what he can to destroy public honor of the Book.’ (The International Jew, Vol. III, p. 16).
‘I am devoting my lecture in this seminar to a discussion of the possibility that we are now entering a Jewish century, a time when the spirit of the community, the non-ideological blend of the emotional and rational and the resistance to categories and forms will emerge through the forces of anti-nationalism to provide us with a new kind of society. I call this process the Judaization of Christianity because Christianity will be the vehicle through which this society becomes Jewish.’ (Rabbi Martin Siegel, New York Magazine, p. 32, January 18, 1972)
When studied carefully, we can clearly see in all four Gospels the racial, political, and religious clash between Yeshua Messiah and his devoted Judean followers together with the written Law of Moses versus the Babylonian Pharisees (the ‘Jews,’ and their ‘Oral Law’, which eventually became the Talmud). This intense, never-ending conflict is the defining feature of the struggle between early, first-hand Christian truth and its satanic counterfeit, that of Talmudic Judaism the same battle which still continues unabated to this very day.
‘For you, brethren, became followers of the churches of God which in Judæa are in Messiah Yeshua: for you also have suffered like things from your own countrymen, even as they have of the Jews, who both killed the Lord Yeshua, and their own prophets, and have persecuted us; and they please not God, and are contrary to all men.’ [Words of the Apostle Sha’ul/Paul, himself a Pharisee: 1 Thessalonians 2:14-15]
The late Jewish academic Professor Israel Shahak, in his classic study Jewish History, Jewish Religion, gives an example: ‘In 1962 a part of the Maimonidean Code … the so-called ‘Book of Knowledge,’ which contains the most basic rules of Jewish faith and practice, was published in Jerusalem in a bilingual edition, with the English translation facing the Hebrew text. The latter has been restored to its original purity, and the command to exterminate Jewish infidels appears in it in full: ‘It is a duty to exterminate them with one’s own hands.’ In the English translation this is somewhat softened to: ‘It is a duty to take active measures to destroy them.’
But then the Hebrew text goes on to specify the prime examples of ‘infidels’ who must be exterminated: ‘Such as Yeshua of Nazareth and his pupils, and Tzadoq and Baitos [the founders of the Sadducean sect] and their pupils, may the name of the wicked rot.’ Not one word of this appears in the English text on the facing page (78a). And, even more significant, in spite of the wide circulation of this book among scholars in the English-speaking countries, not one of them has, as far as I know, protested against this glaring deception.’
The New, Improved Jewish ‘Messiah’ . . .
Today’s elitist Pharisaic ‘Jews’ believe that the mind-set of the world must be changed to think of Christianity as evil and of them as the true Elect, i.e., those who practice Pharisaism, (Babylonian Talmudism), as the ONE AND ONLY genuine Chosen People of God. Talmudic Jews call the New Testament Covenant ‘blank paper’ (Talmud, Sabbath 116a), therefore claiming that:
(1) Christianity is a 2,000 year old fraud;
(2) Talmudism/Pharisaism is the only true religion of God on the earth; and,
(3) the Talmud is the only ‘holy book’ God has ordained since the Tanakh.
In The Pharisees, his two-volume work, the renowned Rabbi Finklestein writes: ‘Pharisaism became Talmudism… but the spirit of the ancient Pharisee remains unaltered. When the Jew studies the Talmud he is actually repeating the arguments used in the Palestinian academies. From Palestine to Babylonia: from Babylonia to North Africa, Italy, Spain, France and Germany; from these to Poland, Russia and Eastern Europe generally, ancient Pharisaism has wandered.’
In Rabbi Finklestein’s history of the Jews, he states: ‘the Talmud derives its authority from the position held by the ancient (Pharisee) academies. The teachers of those academies, both of Babylonia and of Palestine, were considered the rightful successors of the older Sanhedrin. At the present time the Jewish people have no living central authority comparable in status to the ancient Sanhedrin’s or the later academies. Therefore any decision regarding the Jewish religion must be based on the Talmud as the final résumé of the teaching of those authorities when they existed.’ (The JEWS Their History, Culture and Religion, Vol 4, p 1332, Jewish Publication Society of America, 1949).
The Coming Jewish World-State . . .
‘A model ideal state will gradually spread its teachings and influence from nation to nation, …the people of Israel [Jews] will thus conquer the nations of the earth …all other peoples will be known by their detestable practices and idolatry [They call Christians idolaters] …they will be destroyed and will disappear from earth before the ushering in of the ideal era. To understand the Rabbinic conception of an ideal world it will help us if we can imagine A HAND PASSING FROM LAND TO LAND, COUNTRY TO COUNTRY, MARKING RIGHTEOUS OR WICKED ON THE FOREHEADS OF EACH ONE OF THE INHABITANTS OF THE EARTHLY GLOBE’ (The Jewish Utopia, by Rabbi Michael Higger, Ph.D.).
‘When the Messiah comes, all will be slaves of the Jews.’ (Talmud, Erubin 43b)
During the coming horrendous period when Talmudic Jews will reign unchallenged in one form or another under the auspices of their pseudo god-king, the anti-Christ, it will be they that will re-introduce beheading as an execution measure to satisfy their Talmud-sanctioned blood-lust. This method of execution for the faithful saints during this time is even mentioned in the book of Revelation:
‘…and I saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Yeshua, and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands;’ (Revelation 20:4)
The deaths of which, will be seen as doing their ‘god’ a favor according to this:
‘A Jew who kills a Christian commits no sin, but offers an acceptable sacrifice to God.’ (Talmud Abodah Zarah 26b Tosephoth)
And this too is prophesied by our Lord Yeshua (John 16:2-3):
2 They shall put you out of the synagogues: yea, the time comes, that whosoever kills you will think that he does God service.
3 And these things will they do unto you, because they have not known the Father, nor me.
What Are the ‘Noahide/Noachide Laws’? . . .
According to the Talmud, the so-called ‘Noahide’ (or ‘Noachide’) Laws were given by God to Noah when the ark came to rest on Mount Ararat. This is entirely unsubstantiated by the written Hebrew Tanakh (what Christians call the ‘Old Testament’), and should be regarded by Christians as nothing more than cunning Jewish lies designed to ultimately enslave them.
Because what they don’t tell us is that the Noahide Laws ONLY APPLY TO NON-JEWS, that Christianity is ‘idol worship’ under the Noahide Laws, and ALL non-Jews who refuse to be bound by them will be killed, probably by beheading, which is the prescribed method of execution under these laws. Is any of this prophesied in the Christian Bible? You judge . . .
‘…and I saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Yeshua, and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Messiah a thousand years.’ [Revelation 20:4]
‘…and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan.’ [Revelation 2:9]
‘Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie; behold, I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, and to know that I have loved thee.’ [Revelation 3:9]
Let us start by listing these seven major ‘Noahide’ Laws:
1. You shall not engage in idol worship.
2. You shall not blaspheme God.
3. You shall not shed innocent blood of a human nor fetus nor ailing person who has a limited time to live.
4. You shall not engage in bestial, incestuous, adulterous, or homosexual relations nor commit …rape.
5. You shall not steal.
6. You shall establish laws and courts of law to administer these laws.
7. You shall not be cruel to animals.
Sounds pretty noble, religion-neutral, and universally acceptable, doesn’t it? But the devil is in the details, the ‘details’ in this case being the definitions of ‘idol worship’, ‘blaspheme’, ‘innocent’, ‘administer’, etc.
The ‘Encyclopedia Americana’ gives its ‘explanation’ of the Noahide Laws,
‘Throughout the ages, scholars have viewed the Noahide Laws as a link between Judaism and Christianity, as universal norms of ethical conduct, as a basic concept of international law, or as a guarantee of fundamental human rights for all.’
They somehow neglect to mention that the Noahide Laws apply only to non-Jews. Moreover, this facile explanation leads one to believe that (a) all ‘scholars’ agree about the legitimacy of the ‘Noahide’ laws; and (b) that everyone on earth should agree to be bound by these seven laws. However, the truth is that the Jew who claims to live according to the ‘Torah,’ (certainly not the written Torah given to Moses, but rather the Talmud, that occultic/Kabbalistic/Pharisaic tradition adopted from the mystery religions of ancient Babylon) is not bound by the Noahide Laws. The Noahide Laws will only apply to non-Jews and are to be a direct replacement for all other civil and religious laws AND the Biblical Ten Commandments, with draconian penalties attached which far exceed anything allowed by the written Torah of Moses.
‘It is the law to kill anyone who denies the Torah. The Christians belong to the denying ones of the Torah.’ Talmud: Choszhen hamischpat 425 Hagah 425. 5
Now does that sound like their version of ‘Torah’ is the same as our Biblical Old Testament? We think not! These ‘Jews’ wish to commence with the U.S.A. to be ruled by the Noahide Laws, (which at first glance seem to be something harmless, and even moral) together with whatever is intrinsically implied in them however, as is said, ‘the devil is in the details.’
One of these ‘details’ is that there are also sixty-six other
‘Lesser-Known Noahide Laws’ which are equally deadly.
The real goal of ALL of the Noahide Laws is to have the non-Jewish population of the United States (and eventually the world) totally subject to and ruled by judicial enactments that are exclusively managed, interpreted and manipulated by ultra-orthodox Jewish rabbis, a new Sanhedrin. The penalty for violation is clearly spelled out on page 1192 of the Encyclopedia Judaica: ‘violation of any one of the seven laws subjects the Noahide to capital punishment by DECAPITATION’, even being ‘cruel’ to an animal. Rather harsh, wouldn’t you say?
So, if only one Jew steps forward to merely accuse any non-Jew of violating any one of these seven laws, that testimony alone regardless of the absence of corroborating witnesses or the otherwise proven untruth of the allegation would be enough for the sentence of death. But notice how Deuteronomy 17:6 clearly requires the testimony of 2 or 3 witnesses before one who deserves death can be executed. In fact, the last sentence of verse 6 states: ‘At the mouth of two witnesses, or three witnesses, shall he that is worthy of death be put to death; but at the mouth of one witness he shall NOT be put to death.’ So much for the COMMANDMENT of YHVH Elohim!
‘Every Jew, who spills the blood of the godless, (non-Jews) is doing the same as making a sacrifice to God.’ (Talmud: Bammidber raba c 21 & Jalkut 772)
Their dead bodies will be exhibited as public warnings to all others who would resist their power. The Lord’s Supper will be transformed from wine, the symbolic blood of Yeshua, to the real blood of true believers, that will be soon freely shed under this new, Satanic theocracy!
Always remember as Biblical fact, that the Pharisaic Jewish establishment succeeded in the illegal trial and subsequent killing of Yeshua Messiah on the primary basis that he blasphemed God (Matthew 26:65), which is Noahide Law number 2 ‘Thou shalt not blaspheme God.’
‘Extermination of a Christian is a necessary sacrifice to God.’ Talmud Zohar (II, 43a)
Make no mistake, these remarkable and sickening quotes from the Talmud (Soncino Edition) here and elsewhere, are quite genuine and gleaned from a large variety of reliable sources, mostly Jewish. These are but a few of the hundreds of similar Talmudic passages that deal with the required treatment of Christians. THIS is the reality of the Jewish Talmudic ‘legacy,’ and there is much more to come.
‘The Jewish people as a whole will be its own Messiah.’ It will attain world dominion by the dissolution of other races, by the abolition of frontiers, the annihilation of monarchy, and by the establishment of a world republic in which the Jews will everywhere exercise the privilege of citizenship. In this New World Order the Children of Israel will furnish all the leaders without encountering opposition. The Governments of the different peoples forming the world republic will fall without difficulty into the hands of the Jews. It will then be possible for the Jewish rulers to abolish private property, and everywhere to make use of the resources of the state. Thus will the promise of the Talmud be fulfilled, in which is said that when the Messianic time is come the Jews will have all the property of the whole world in their hands.’
[Baruch Levy, Letter to Karl Marx, La Revue de Paris, p. 54, June 1, 1928]
Bear in mind that the above is not taken from the ‘Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion’, a work which has been vehemently denied by virtually all rabbinic Jews as an imposture. This is an authenticated verbatim quotation from one of the early recognized leaders of international Zionism! What does it mean that it is actually a condensed version of the absolutely identical aims and methods as put forward in the ‘Protocols’? Who is kidding whom?
Please note that these so-called ‘Noahide Laws’ appear NOWHERE in the written Tanakh, the
Old Testament of the Christian Bible, but have been INVENTED by the Pharisaic authors of the Babylonian Talmud, the Kabbalah, a.k.a. ‘Mystery Babylon’, as a bogus theological assertion to try to legitimize their bloodthirsty lust for power. Have they succeeded? You be the judge.
The following is an edict by President Ronald Reagan:
Public Papers of the Presidents April 4, 1985
CITE: 1985 Pub. Papers LENGTH: 365 words
HEADLINE: Education Day, U.S.A., 1985 HIGHLIGHT: Proclamation 5317.
BODY: By the President of the United States of America
A proclamation [emphasis added]
In order to achieve its highest goals, education must be more than just a training in facts and figures, or even in basic skills, as important as they are. It must also include instruction in the deepest ethical values of our civilization.
Very few Americans have done more to promote these ethical values as the basis of civilization than Rabbi Mendel Schneerson, the leader of the worldwide Lubavitch movement. The word ‘Lubavitch’ comes from the name of a Russian city and means city of love. That is very appropriate because, of all the ethical values which inform our civilization, none is more important than love of wisdom, love of our fellowman, and love of our Creator.
These are the values which Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson exemplifies. And they are the values, with their roots in the Seven Noahide Laws, which have guided the Lubavitch movement throughout its history. They are the essence of education at its best, and we should be certain that we pass on this precious heritage to all young Americans.
In recognition of Rabbi Schneerson’s contributions and in honor of his 83rd birthday, which falls this year on April 2, the Congress, by House Joint Resolution 186, has designated April 2, 1985, as ‘Education Day, U.S.A.’ and authorized and requested the President to issue an appropriate proclamation in observance of this event.
Now, Therefore, I, Ronald Reagan, President of the United States of America, do hereby proclaim Tuesday, April 2, 1985, as Education Day, U.S.A., and I call upon the people of the United States, and in particular our teachers and other educational leaders, to observe that day with appropriate ceremonies and activities.
In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand this fourth day of April, in the year of our Lord nineteen hundred and eighty-five, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and ninth.
(signed) Ronald Reagan [Filed with the Office of the Federal Register, 11:48 a.m., April 5, 1985]
And this . . .
The Congress of the United States of America has declared that the seven universal laws commanded to Noah (the Noahide laws) are ‘the bedrock of society from the dawn of civilization.’ U.S. Congress, H.J. Resolution 104, Public Law 102-14, 1991.
Believe it or not, boys and girls, this effectively establishes the Noahide Laws as the primary basis for all International Law, (read ‘New World Order’) to which all American law MUST eventually conform. This unique public law remarkably singles out one particular Jewish group for special honor, saying that they best embody the principles of these Noahide Laws. This group is the previously mentioned Chabad Lubavitcher Movement, of the rabidly anti-Gentile Chabad Hasidic Jews.
The following is a blueprint for the establishment of the Noahide Laws in the formerly Palistinian-occupied areas of ‘Israel’. It is quoted from Al Gore Letter #10, 01-Nov-2000 Education Day USA (since removed from the internet, for obvious reasons):
‘Upon seizing the reins of government, the new Noahide leaders will move quickly to implement a full agenda of reform. … Full support will be given to Israeli forces to reinvade PLO-controlled areas, with military assistance offered where necessary. Jewish courts will be granted full legal sovereignty over Jewish citizens within each country, who will no longer be subject to the authority of gentile courts. The pre-existing Noahide judges and courts will replace the existing court system of each country, and the legal code will be drastically rewritten to conform to halacha…. …. And law and order will be fully restored through the establishment of internal security measures, again in accordance with Torah law.’
So, apparently seeking ANY kind of a power base in a storm, algore the goyische goldfish, has ignorantly thrown in with the Lubavitcher piranha. And the beat goes on.
But at least some Jewish scholars have come to somewhat different, and less flattering, conclusions concerning the Lubavitchers and their ‘Messiah’ wanna-be. Israel Shahak, a Jew, in his book, Jewish History, Jewish Religion: The Weight of Three Thousand Years, states that:
‘My final, more general example is, if possible, even more shocking than the others. It concerns the attitude of the Hassidic movement toward non-Jews. Hassidism a continuation (and debasement!) of Jewish mysticism is still a living movement, with hundreds of thousands of active adherents who are fanatically devoted to their ‘holy rabbis,’ some of whom have acquired a very considerable political influence in Israel, among the leaders of most parties and even more so in the higher echelons of the army.
‘What, then, are the views of this movement concerning non-Jews? As an example, let us take the famous Hatanya, fundamental book of the Habbad movement, one of the most important branches of Hassidism. According to this book, all non-Jews are totally satanic creatures ‘in whom there is absolutely nothing good.’
‘Even a non-Jewish embryo is qualitatively different from a Jewish one. The very existence of a non-Jew is ‘inessential’, whereas all of creation was created solely for the sake of the Jews.’
‘This book is circulated in countless editions, and its ideas are further propagated in the numerous ‘discourses’ of the rabbi, M. M. Schneurssohn (Schneerson), who leads this powerful world-wide organisation from his New York headquarters.
‘In Israel these ideas are widely disseminated among the public at large, in the schools and in the army. (According to the testimony of Shulamit Aloni, Member of the Knesset, this Habbad propaganda was particularly stepped up before Israel’s invasion of Lebanon in March 1978, in order to induce military doctors and nurses to withhold medical help from ‘Gentile wounded.’ This Nazi-like advice did not refer specifically to Arabs or Palestinians, but simply to ‘Gentiles,’ goyim.)
‘A former Israeli President, Shazar, was an ardent adherent of Habbad, and many top Israeli and American politicians headed by Prime Minister Begin publicly courted and supported it. This, in spite of the considerable unpopularity of the Lubavitcher rabbi in Israel he was widely criticised because he refuses to come to the Holy Land even for a visit and keeps himself in New York for obscure messianic reasons, while in New York his anti-Black attitude is notorious.
‘The fact that, despite these pragmatic difficulties, Habbad can be publicly supported by so many top political figures owes much to the thoroughly disingenuous and misleading treatment by almost all scholars who have written about the Hassidic movement and its Habbad branch. This applies particularly to all who have written or are writing about it in English. They suppress the glaring evidence of the old Hassidic texts as well as the latter-day political implications that follow from them, which stare in the face of even a casual reader of the Israeli Hebrew press, in whose pages the Lubavitcher rabbi and other Hassidic leaders constantly publish the most rabid bloodthirsty statements and exhortations against all Arabs.
‘A chief deceiver in this case, and a good example of the power of deception, was Martin Buber. His numerous works eulogising the whole Hassidic movement (including Habbad) never so much as hint at the real doctrines of Hassidism concerning non-Jews. The crime of deception is all the greater in view of the fact that Buber’s eulogies of Hassidism were first published in German during the period of the rise of German nationalism and the accession of Nazism to power.
‘But while ostensibly opposing Nazism, Buber glorified a movement holding and actually teaching doctrines about non-Jews not unlike the Nazi doctrines about Jews. One could of course argue that the Hassidic Jews of seventy or fifty years ago were the victims, and a ‘white lie’ favouring a victim is excusable. But the consequences of deception are incalculable. Buber’s works were translated into Hebrew, were made a powerful element of the Hebrew education in Israel, have greatly increased the power of the blood-thirsty Hassidic leaders, and have thus been an important factor in the rise of Israeli chauvinism and hatred of all non-Jews. If we think of the many human beings who died of their wounds because Israeli army nurses, incited by Hassidic propaganda, refused to tend them, then a heavy onus for their blood lies on the head of Martin Buber.’
Quoted verbatim from Israel Shahak, Jewish History, Jewish Religion: The Weight of Three Thousand Years, Pluto Press, London and Boulder Colorado, 1994, pp. 26-28.
The Real Goals of the Lubavitchers . . .
Here, exposed from behind the carefully contrived façade of phony moral statutes and deliberately misleading phrases, are the real goals of the Noahide Laws:
1. The elimination of the entire written Hebrew Tanakh and the total rejection of the Renewed Covenant Scriptures (‘New Testament’);
2. The rejection of the atonement of HaMashiach upon the execution stake;
3. The rejection of the Plan/Logos of YHVH Elohim for the salvation of mankind;
4. The spying on one another to supply the one eyewitness needed to trigger the death penalty (contrary to Deuteronomy 17:6);
5. The necessity of keeping the other 66 ‘lesser known Noahide laws’;
6. Circumcision of all males;
7. Eating only rabbinically-approved kosher foods;
8. Forbidding the holding of religious services of any type in a place that is not an approved assembly place for Noahides;
9. The death penalty for anyone (Christians being the main target) who claims that God has spoken through them by way of teaching, preaching or writing, that is in any way contradictory to the establishment ‘worship system.’
‘The Christians are always singing about the blood. Let us give them enough of it! Let us cut their throats and drag them over the altar! And let them drown in their own blood! I dream of the day when the last priest is strangled on the guts of the last preacher.’ (Chairman of the American Communist Party, Gus Hall, a Jew)
It will be a serious crime to claim to be a Prophet, Preacher, or Pastor, to whom the Antichrist authorities have not issued a certificate of approval, and it will be a death penalty offence to oppose in any way the new ‘religion’. ‘Opposition’ means to merely speak against any Jewish priest, any Jewish rabbi, any Noahide minister, any Noahide or Jewish temple or place of worship, or oppose any doctrine that the ‘Rebbe Adepts’ teach or advocate. So, under the guise of Pharisaic Judaism, the modern Kabbalists are cunningly taking us all back to Babylon, and to the ancient house of pagan bondage from which they slithered.
How then, could any Torah-true talmid (disciple) of Yeshua of Nazareth ever support the diabolical plotting behind the precepts of the Noahide laws, to aid in the destruction of the Renewed Covenant Scriptures (‘New Testament’), and of the Church, and be complicit in the killing of the precious and faithful Saints of God? Yet this is exactly what the reconstruction of the Temple will surely lead to!
Antichrists are even now arising from all Protestant denominations, who deny that salvation is through Yeshua Messiah alone. The Roman Catholic ‘pope’ has said as much, and leaders of certain Anglican, Episcopal, Presbyterian, and other ‘mainline Protestant’ denominations have said as much. This is that spirit of Anti-Christ which will join forces with Jewish rabbis together with other ‘Jewish-Gentile’ groups to complete their total assault on evangelical Christianity.
‘All Jews are good by nature, all non-Jews are evil by nature. The Jews are creation’s crowning glory, the non-Jews are the scum of the earth.’
This quote is typical of the Talmudic-Jewish philosophy that saturates the thinking of Jews such as Rabbi Shneur Zalman, one of the leading ‘Halacha’ scholars in Jewish history according to the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, March 11, 1994, p. 14.
From Their Own Lips . . .
The following is included, not from any desire to inflame Christians, but so that Christians may
see for themselves what many Jews believe about themselves and about Christ, Christianity, and Christians. The following is taken verbatim from a prominent ‘Lubavitcher’ website, the ‘Noah’s Covenant Web Site’,…
[NOTE: Bible verses quoted below have been inserted for the reader’s understanding.
They are NOT included in the Chabad Lubavitcher website text.
Also, the web address above, ending in YESHU, is not ‘a Jewish way of spelling Yeshua.’ It is an ACRONYM in Hebrew (Yemach shemo vezichro), used to refer to Yeshua, standing for ‘May his name and memory be blotted out’. Ed.]

************************ Start of the Chabad Lubavitcher website **************************
Who Was Jesus?
The Bible gave a warning about a dangerous, false prophet who would arise to test our faith in G-d. In Deuteronomy 13, [Note: The following obviously is a warning against GENERIC behavior, NOT against a SPECIFIC person. Ed.]
13:1 IF there arise among you a prophet, or a dreamer of dreams, and giveth thee a sign or a wonder,
2 And the sign or the wonder come to pass, whereof he spake unto thee, saying, Let us go after other gods, which thou hast not known, and let us serve them; [Yeshua never preached any God but the unitary, monotheistic YHVH Elohim of the Hebrew Tanakh, and they know it!]
3 Thou shalt not hearken unto the words of that prophet, or that dreamer of dreams: for the LORD your God proveth you, to know whether ye love the LORD your God with all your heart and with all your soul.
4 Ye shall walk after the LORD your God, and fear him, and keep his commandments, and obey his voice, and ye shall serve him, and cleave unto him.
5 And that prophet, or that dreamer of dreams, shall be put to death; because he hath spoken to turn you away from the LORD your God, which brought you out of the land of Egypt, and
redeemed you out of the house of bondage, to thrust thee out of the way which the LORD thy God commanded thee to walk in. So shalt thou put the evil away from the midst of thee.
6 If thy brother, the son of thy mother, or thy son, or thy daughter, or the wife of thy bosom, or thy friend, which is as thine own soul, entice thee secretly, saying, Let us go and serve other gods, which thou hast not known, thou, nor thy fathers;
7 Namely, of the gods of the people which are round about you, nigh unto thee, or far off from thee, from the one end of the earth even unto the other end of the earth;
8 Thou shalt not consent unto him, nor hearken unto him; neither shall thine eye pity him, neither shalt thou spare, neither shalt thou conceal him:
9 But thou shalt surely kill him; thine hand shall be first upon him to put him to death, and afterwards the hand of all the people.
10 And thou shalt stone him with stones, that he die; because he hath sought to thrust thee away from the LORD thy God, which brought thee out of the land of Egypt, from the house of bondage.
11 And all Israel shall hear, and fear, and shall do no more any such wickedness as this is among you.
G-d describes this [Emphasis added. Ed.] false prophet as a member of the Jewish people (v. 2, 7) who would tell true prophecies and would have the power of miracles. G-d Himself would give this false prophet the power to perform miracles and reveal prophecy, but the false prophet would try to seduce the people away from G-d’s Law and towards strange gods unknown to Judaism. The purpose would be to test whether we are truly committed to living under the Law [by which they mean their oral Torah/Talmud, which violates the written Torah of YHVH in myriad ways!], or whether we will be dazzled and fall for the temptation to join a false path to salvation (v. 3-6, 7-8, 11). In this Biblical passage, G-d repeatedly commands the Jews to kill this false prophet, lest the evil spread and destroy many souls.
To be accepted by the people, the false prophet would sometimes pretend to be a righteous Jew who fulfills the Law, but at key moments he would turn against certain details of the Law in order to make the breach (v. 6, 7). This is the reason that verse 1 commands us not to add or subtract any details from the Law, and verse 5 warns us to remain steadfast with all the traditions of the Law. [[It says NO SUCH THING, and YHVH Elohim EXPLICITLY CONDEMNS the teaching of ‘the commandments of men, taught as doctrine.’ (Isaiah 29:13)]]
In Deuteronomy 17, this false prophet is also described as someone who would rebel against the authority of the judges of the Jewish people, and who should be put to death for his rebelliousness (v. 8-13, esp. v. 12). Who are the judges? The highest court in Israel was the Sanhedrin, which was established by Moses (Exodus 18:13-26; Numbers 11:16-29), and which lasted more than 15 centuries. [[Neither Moses nor ‘the judges’ were ANYWHERE AUTHORIZED TO CHANGE THE WRITTEN TORAH. Yet they did, and do!]] The members of the Sanhedrin were the rabbis known as ‘Pharisees’ (Pirushim, ‘those with the explanation’). G-d gave permanent authority to these judges to interpret the Law and G?d’s Word, [Moses gave them the authority to INTERPRET, not CHANGE, TORAH.- Ed.] and it is a commandment to follow their decisions without turning even slightly to the right or the left (Deut. 17:11). [[Another BFL. The command is to obey the WRITTEN TORAH, not ‘the commandments of men, taught as doctrine. (Isaiah 29:13) -Ed.]] But the false prophet would challenge the authority of the Sanhedrin, thus revealing himself to be an evil man.
[The authors thereby call Yeshua haMashiach ‘an evil man’ and thus bear false witness against the holy Spirit, which is sacrilege, blasphemy, and ‘the unforgivable sin’. Ed.]
In the book of the prophet Daniel, this false prophet is described as a king (the eleventh horn on a terrible beast) who would wage war against the Jews (the ‘holy ones’; see Deut. 14:2 on this term) and would change the Law including the calendar and the holidays (Daniel 7:8, 20-25).
[So here they call Christ the anti-Christ, totally ignoring the sequence of end-times events described in Daniel, Ezekiel, Jeremiah, Isaiah, Joel, etc.! Again, bearing false witness against the holy Spirit of YHVH Elohim, Ruach haKodesh! Ed.]
Elsewhere, this false prophet is described as a king who would disregard the G-d of his fathers, exalting himself as a god and giving honor to this new god-head (Daniel 11:36-39).
The man known today as ‘Yeshua’ fulfilled all these prophecies. He became a ‘king’ (over the Christian church) who changed the original Law, doing away with the Hebrew calendar and the Biblical holidays (Rosh Hashanah, Yom Kippur, Sukkos the Festival of Tabernacles, Passover, etc.). He disregarded the one, infinite G-d of the Hebrew Bible in favor of a new ‘trinity’ [ No, pagan ‘Christianity’ did that. Yeshua NEVER claimed to BE God! John 17:3- Ed.] that included himself. And he repeatedly broke the Law by committing terrible sins, while openly challenging the G-d-given authority of the rabbis of the Sanhedrin.
[Yet no one could be found to testify against him at his ‘trial’, and he was killed by the Romans with the cooperation of the Sanhedrin, in direct violation of the written Torah of Moses. Ed.]
Naturally, Yeshua did sometimes pretend to respect the Law, but whenever he thought he could get away with it, he turned right around and broke that same Law. In Matthew 5:17-19, he declared that he came to fulfill the Law, and in Matthew 23:1-3 he defended the authority of the rabbis. [Due to a MIStranslation by the Bible translators!-Ed.] But the rest of the time, he rebelled against the Law thus showing that his occasional words of piety were meant only to hide his evil agenda. The following sins of Yeshua are recorded in the ‘New Testament’:
1) Yeshua repudiated the laws of kosher food (Mark 7:18-19). [Compare this to the prophet Daniel’s strict adherence to kashrus, in Daniel chapter 1.] [[These are RABBINIC laws, NOT Torah!]]
2) He repudiated the laws of honoring one’s parents, and called on his followers to hate their parents; he also dishonored his own mother (Matthew 10:34-36; Matthew 12:46-50; Luke 14:26).
3) He violated the Sabbath by picking grain, and incited his disciples to do the same (Matthew 12:1-8; Mark 2:23-26). [No, he violated the rabbinic prohibitions, NOT the Torah! Ed.]
4) He again violated the Sabbath by healing a man’s arm, which was not a matter of saving a life, and he openly defied the rabbis in his total repudiation of the Sabbath (Matthew 12:9-13; Mark 3:1-5 [Compare this to G-d’s view of violating the Sabbath, in Numbers 15:32-36, Nehemiah 10:30-32, and dozens of other places throughout the Bible.]
[BFL. No, he violated the rabbinic prohibitions, NOT the written Torah of Moses! Please note that they totally ignore the FACT that Yeshua COULD heal a man’s withered arm ! They do not even try to deny his powers ! Ed.]
5) Yeshua brazenly defied and disobeyed the rabbis of the Sanhedrin, repudiating their authority (This is recorded in many places throughout the New Testament, but look especially at Matthew 23:13-39 and John 8:44-45). [[AMEN! He identified them as ‘the synagogue of Satan’!-Ed.]]
The Talmud (Babylonian edition) records other sins of ‘Yeshua the Nazarene’:
1) He and his disciples practiced sorcery and black magic, led Jews astray into idolatry, and were sponsored by foreign, gentile powers for the purpose of subverting Jewish worship (Sanhedrin 43a). [[BFL. ZERO evidence from history to corroborate this charge.-Ed.]]
2) He was sexually immoral, worshipped statues of stone (a brick is mentioned), was cut off from the Jewish people for his wickedness, and refused to repent (Sanhedrin 107b; Sotah 47a). [[BFL. ZERO evidence from history to corroborate this charge.-Ed.]]
3) He learned witchcraft in Egypt and, to perform miracles, used procedures that involved cutting his flesh which is also explicitly banned in the Bible (Shabbos 104b). [[BFL. ZERO evidence from history to corroborate this charge.-Ed.]]
The false, rebellious message of Yeshua has been thoroughly rejected by the vast majority of the Jewish people, as G-d commanded. Unfortunately, however, this same message has brought a terrible darkness upon the world; today, over 1.5 billion gentiles believe in Yeshua. These lost souls mistakenly think they have found salvation in Yeshua; tragically, they are in for a rude awakening. Truth and eternal life are found directly from G-d, through performing His Law. Any ‘mediator’ only separates man from G-d:
1) ‘G-d is not a man, who can lie, nor the son of man, who relents. He has not beheld iniquity in Jacob, nor has He seen perverseness in Israel’ (Numbers 23:19). [This refers to the person of Israel, and surely not to the ‘children of Israel’, who are damned by YHVH Elohim for their violation of His covenant, for their stubborn rebelliousness, their myriad ‘whoredoms’ (worship of false Babylonian & Canaanite deities which continues to today witness the names of these false ‘gods’ which they have chosen for the names of the months of their calendar, Tammuz, etc., described by YHVH as ‘an abomination’. (Ezekiel 8:12-14)]
2) Speaking prophetically of the Christian church, Moses declared, ‘For their ‘rock’ is not like our Rock. Where is their god, in whom they trusted?’ (Deut. 32:31, 37). [BFL. These verses actually refer to the children of ISRAEL themselves, ‘Jeshurun’, how they will corrupt themselves, AFTER they enter the Promised Land. As in the ‘Jews’ in ‘Israel’ TODAY! (Isaiah 28:14) -Ed.]]
3) ‘‘See now that I, only I, am He, and there is no god with Me. I kill, and I bring to life; I wound, and I heal, and there is none who can rescue from My Hand.’ Sing songs of joy, gentiles, with His people, for He will avenge the blood of His servants, and will take vengeance on His enemies, and will forgive His land and His people’ (Deut. 32:39, 43).
4) ‘I, only I am HaShem [Literally, ‘the Name’, a typically sanctimonious Pharisaic reference to YHWH Ed.], and besides Me there is no savior’ (Isaiah 43:11).
5) ‘I am the First and I am the Last; besides me there is no god. Is there a god besides Me? There is no rock; I do not know any’ (Isaiah 44:6).
6) ‘Israel is saved in Hashem with an eternal salvation. Assemble yourselves and come, come near together, you gentiles who have escaped [the judgment]. (They have no knowledge, those who carry wooden sculptures and who pray to a god that does not save.) Announce and bring near, even take counsel together: Who declared this from ancient times, and announced it from then? Is it not I, Hashem? And there are no other gods beside Me, nor any righteous and saving god other than Me. Turn to Me and be saved, all ends of the earth, for I am G-d and there is none else. By Myself I swore, a righteous word went out of my mouth and it will not be withdrawn, that to Me every knee will bow and every tongue will swear’ (Isaiah 45:17, 20-23).
What is the true key to salvation? Those who return to the Law (the Seven Commandments for
the Children of Noah, according to the eternal covenant made with Noah in Genesis 9) and who assist the Jewish people (Isaiah 60, 61, 66) will be saved and will participate in the miracles and revelations, including worshipping in the Third Temple, under the kingship of the Messiah. [To many of these BOGUS bloodthirsty monsters, Jews ARE ‘the Messiah’, as is borne out in many of their other writings and teachings. Ed.] As described in many places, including Jeremiah 16:19-21 and Zechariah 8:20-23, all the old gentile religions of the world will disappear, and their followers will turn to the Jews for spiritual leadership. Until then, Christians are spiritually blinded, and cannot yet understand G-d’s wisdom in the Bible.
Ours is the last generation of the era of sin and evil and the first of the Messianic Era. Indeed, for the first time in history, there is a growing consensus of leading rabbis willing to name the man most suited to be the Messiah, and they are agreeing that he is the Lubavitcher Rebbe, Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson.
[So, this is how the identity of ‘the Messiah’ is going to be determined? It is an elective office? And only Jewish rabbis get to vote? Please, show us that in the Torah, or even in your diabolical Talmud. Oops! Sorry, boys. Your ‘messiah’ died. And, at last peek, was still rotting. Ed.]
The Rebbe is the spiritual leader of our generation, having boldly stirred up controversy over vital issues in which other leaders have remained tragically silent or have even caved in to the growing forces of darkness. He has upheld the Law perfectly [[Really? And which ‘Law’ was that? Surely NOT the written Torah of Moses, was it? Since, by your own admission, with your takanot and ma-asim, ‘the commandments of MEN, taught as doctrine’ (Isaiah 29:13), you have given yourselves the ‘authority’ to break the WRITTEN Torah of YHVH Elohim whenever you wish! And so with ‘the Rebbe’!- Ed.]] and has worked mightily to strengthen the observance of the Law by Jews, as well as the observance of the Noahide Law by gentiles. Through his teaching of chasidus (Jewish mystical teachings, preserved from Moses and Mount Sinai [[BFL. ZERO evidence from history to corroborate this charge.-Ed.]], he has taught the world that G-d is One, the Infinite Who renews creation at every moment. The Rebbe is a direct descendant of King David [NOT if he’s an Ashkenazim from Eastern Europe, he’s not! But they know that this cannot be explicitly DISproven, since the genealogical records were destroyed along with the Second Temple by the Roman General Titus in 68 A.D. Ed.] and has received a true prophecy from G-d that we who are alive in this generation shall be the first in history to see the coming of the true messiah. Many Jews are eagerly anticipating the Rebbe’s resurrection from the grave, ready to re-establish the Sanhedrin and anoint the king.
Our job is to finish preparing the way, by announcing the truth [[ They should choke when they print or say this!- Ed.]] and bringing all of mankind back to the Law immediately. Through our divinely mandated efforts, we shall now clear the path for the return of the Garden of Eden and the establishment of the eternal sinless world promised by Isaiah and the other Biblical prophets.
**** End of Noah’s Covenant ‘Manifesto’ ****
This information is included so that Christians who have no (or limited) prior exposure to the actual teachings of the Chabad Lubavitchers (there’s likely a Chabad synagogue near you!) and other similar racist, hate-based Jewish organizations, might come to understand just how real they are, how serious they are, and how much of a danger they constitute to those of us who intend to survive the imminent reign of the fake Jews’ AntiChrist, called the Great Tribulation.
The Talmud Satanic Hatred of Christians Codified . . .
Dr. Israel Shahak, in his work, Jewish History, Jewish Religion and Bernard Pick in Yeshua in the Talmud, (pp. 57; 105-106), have both confirmed the overt hatred and racism contained in the Talmud. Anyone who denies these deplorable characteristics of the Talmud, the Jews’ ‘holiest’
book, is a liar. Neither the modern popes nor the modern heads of evangelical Protestantism, have ever dared insist that the rabbis of Judaism repudiate or condemn the racism in the Talmud or the murderous hatred for Christ and Christians expressed within it . . ‘for fear of the Jews.’
On the contrary, the blind guides of ‘Churchianity’ have urged their ‘sheeple’ to love, honor and even to obey such evil, degenerate, blasphemous followers of the Godless, pagan Talmud as the
Chabad Lubavitcher, ‘The Rebbe’ Schneerson. Therefore, it should be quite evident that such leaders of Christendom are by default, among the worst betrayers of Yeshua Messiah on earth.
The Synagogue of Satan . . .
As previously mentioned, in the Book of the Revelation, the Lord Yeshua refers to some who call themselves Jews (Greek ioudaios/ioudaios, ‘Judeans’) but who are not such according to the Father or him, and it is apparent that this is not a good thing for them nor for the Church:
8 And unto the angel of the church in Smyrna write; These things says the First and the Last, which was dead, and is alive;
9 I know your works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but you are rich) and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan. [Revelation 2:9]
And again:
7 And to the angel of the church in Philadelphia write; These things says He that is holy, He that is true, He that has the key of David, He that opens, and no man shuts; and shuts, and no man opens;
8 I know your works: behold, I have set before you an open door, and no man can shut it: for you have a little strength, and have kept my word, and have not denied my name.
9 Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie; behold, I will make them to come and worship before your feet, and to know that I have loved you. [Revelation 3:9]
It remains to be seen to whom this refers. Let us recall some of our Lord’s descriptions of the Pharisees of His day:
1 Then came to Yeshua scribes and Pharisees, which were of Jerusalem, saying,
2 Why do your disciples transgress the tradition of the elders? for they wash not their hands when they eat bread.
3 But he answered and said unto them, Why do you also transgress the commandment of God by your traditions?
4 For God commanded, saying, Honor your father and mother: and, He that curses father or mother, let him die the death.
5 But you say, Whosoever shall say to his father or his mother, ‘It is corban’ (dedicated to the Temple), concerning whatsoever of mine you might have been profited;
6 And honor not his father or his mother, he shall be free. Thus have you made the commandment of God of no effect by your traditions.
7 You hypocrites, well did Isaiah prophesy of you (Isaiah 29:13), saying,
8 ‘This people draws near to Me with their mouth, and honors Me with their lips; but their heart is far from Me.
9 But in vain they do worship Me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men.’ [Matthew 15:1-9]
And this:
1 Then spoke Yeshua to the multitude, and to his disciples,
2 Saying, The scribes and the Pharisees sit in Moses’ seat:
3 All therefore whatsoever HE (Moses!) bids you observe, that observe and do; but do not you after THEIR works: for they say, and do not. [According to the Shem Tov Hebrew Gospel of Matthew!]
4 For they bind heavy burdens and grievous to be borne, and lay them on men’s shoulders; but they themselves will not move them with one of their fingers.
5 But all their works they do to be seen of men: they make broad their phylacteries, and enlarge the borders of their garments,
6 And love the uppermost rooms at feasts, and the chief seats in the synagogues,
7 And greetings in the markets, and to be called of men, Rabbi, Rabbi.
8 But do not be called Rabbi: for one is your Master, even Christ; and all you are brethren.
9 And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven.
10 Neither be called masters: for one is your Master, even Christ.
11 But he that is greatest among you shall be your servant.
12 And whosoever shall exalt himself shall be abased; and he that shall humble himself shall be exalted.
13 But woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for you shut up the kingdom of heaven against men: for you neither go in yourselves, neither do you allow them that would enter to go in.
14 Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for you devour widows’ houses, and for a pretence make long prayer: therefore you shall receive the greater damnation.
15 Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for you search sea and land to make one convert, and when he is made, you make him twofold more the child of hell than yourselves.
16 Woe unto you, you blind guides, which say, ‘Whosoever shall swear by the temple, it is nothing; but whosoever shall swear by the gold of the temple, he is bound!’
17 You fools and blind: for whether is greater, the gold, or the temple that sanctifies the gold?
18 And, ‘Whosoever shall swear by the altar, it is nothing; but whosoever swears by the gift that is upon it, he is bound.’
19 You fools and blind: for whether is greater, the gift, or the altar that sanctifies the gift?
20 Whoso therefore shall swear by the altar, swears by it, and by all things thereon.
21 And whoso shall swear by the temple, swears by it, and by him that dwells therein.
22 And he that shall swear by heaven, swears by the throne of God, and by him that sits thereon.
23 Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for you pay tithe of mint and anise and cumin, and have omitted the weightier matters of the law, judgment, mercy, and faith: these you ough

{ Comments are closed }

The Revisionists’ Total Victory on the Historical and Scientific Level By Robert Faurisson

TotalVictory copy

‘The rising flood, particularly on the Internet, that is bringing to the world’s knowledge the spectacular achievements of historical revisionism is not suddenly going to halt its advance or return towards its source.”
~ Robert Faurisson
In France and in the rest of the world historians and specialists of ‘the Holocaust” no longer know what to answer to the revisionists’ arguments. And to speak only of my own case, which has been going on since 1978 (that is, for some thirty-seven years), never has my country’s justice system, despite the tireless requests by self-righteous associations to rule against me on the substance of my writings or statements, been able to note therein the least trace of any rashness, negligence, deliberate ignorance, falsehood, falsification or lying. My adversaries, rich and powerful though they may be, have never succeeded in getting our judges to convict me on the merits of the conclusions reached through my research work which, for over half a century, has focused on what is commonly called ‘the genocide of the Jews”, ‘the Nazi gas chambers” and ‘the six million (or nearly)” Jewish victims of the Third Reich. At most, at the end countless cases I have lost suits (whether as plaintiff or defendant) or been found guilty mainly 1) for a malevolence, supposed but not demonstrated, towards the Jews, 2) for breaking the gayssotine (the Fabius-Gayssot or Faurisson Act, legislation of convenience specifically targeting the findings of my research) or 3) by virtue of the ‘good faith” (sic) of individuals like Léon Poliakov or Robert Badinter, even though found to be at fault by the judges themselves.
For years Poliakov had well and truly manipulated the writings of SS officer Kurt Gerstein (who, having ‘repented” (?), then committed suicide (?)), when not fabricating outright fragments of text to attribute to him. But the judges granted the presumption of good faith to Poliakov. He had been, we were told, ‘animated by the passionate and legitimate desire to inform the public about a period and about facts of contemporary history that were particularly tragic”. It was therefore appropriate to forgive him for having ‘perhaps, on minor points [sic!!!], broken scientific standards of rigour without, however, it being permissible to state that he is a manipulator or fabricator of texts”. As for Badinter, in 2006 he claimed that in 1981, when he was still barrister for the LICRA and just before becoming Minister of Justice, he had got a court to rule against me ‘for being a falsifier of history”. A decision of 2007 restored the truth and held that Badinter had ‘failed in his evidence” to demonstrate my alleged dishonesty; but, the court hastened to add, he had been in good faith. For want of both money and a lawyer (Eric Delcroix having retired not without being refused honorary membership of the bar), I did not appeal and was forced to pay the Socialist millionaire the sum of €5,000. But at least since then I have had the satisfaction of being able to speak of ‘Robert Badinter, my liar, my slanderer… in good faith”.
An astute observer will have noted that the more our opponents sense the game is getting away from them on the historical or scientific level, the more they feel the need to increase their propagandistic drum beating, and the repression as well. In France, at this very moment, they are putting all their hopes in having Parliament pass a supergayssotine. Good for them! A few weeks short of my 87th birthday, I have six cases pending, four against me and two others that I have had to instigate, albeit quite unwillingly. Will my judges finally decide, in 2016, to leave us, my wife and me, destitute? Or are they getting ready simply to throw me into a prison of the République? It is understood beforehand, is it not?, that if they were to carry things to such extremes it would only be on the grounds of the noblest républicain principles and in the name of human rights.
Let’s consider our current Prime Minister. One day, Manuel Valls, in full pomposity, his mouth, heart and left hand clenched, let fly: ‘I am, by my wife, eternally linked to the Jewish community and Israel”. He saw himself as ‘eternal”: a vast programme! But fervour was leading him astray. He ought to come back down to earth, reconnect with the ground, get treatment and stop deluding himself: the revisionists have, already as of now, won the match.
As early as in 1983-1985, Raul Hilberg, surrendering to the arguments of ‘Faurisson and others…” had to drop the pretension of explaining, on the basis of valid arguments and documents of his own, that the Third Reich had, with proper Germanic efficiency, designed, prepared, developed, organised and financed the killing of millions of European Jews. The eminent Jewish American historian ended up finding himself reduced to trying to have us believe that this gigantic massacre had come about by the operation of the Holy Spirit or, in his words, by ‘an incredible meeting of minds, a consensus-mind reading within a large bureaucracy” that had, on its own, spontaneously decided, it seemed, gradually to abandon written communication in favour of verbal or indeed telepathic exchange to such an extent that no written or material evidence bespoke the six million Jews’ (or, in Hilberg’s case, a bit fewer) had been systematically killed either on the Eastern Front or in the gas chambers, mainly at Auschwitz.
Screen Shot 2016-01-14 at 11.16.23 AM
A number of historians or researchers, such as Arno Mayer, Jean-Claude Pressac and Robert Jan van Pelt, have also capitulated, in a more frank and direct manner. The first has had to admit, among other bitter observations, that ‘Sources for the study of the gas chambers are at once rare and unreliable”. The second, a protégé of the Klarsfeld couple, came to understand that the dossier of the official story of the Jews’ extermination, ‘rotten” with too many lies, was bound for ‘the rubbish bins of history”. The third has concluded that ‘Ninety-nine per cent of what we know [about Auschwitz] we do not actually have the physical evidence to prove”; despite this, millions of visitors there have been and continue to be shown a ‘gas chamber” said to be in its ‘original state”, as well as ruins of other alleged ‘gas chambers”. As for the figure of ‘six million”, never subjected to the least scientific verification, it is rooted in the most sordid of realities: an old American publicity slogan used already before 1900 and up to the end of the Second World War to collect a windfall of cash especially from the Jewish community. The searing words amounted to the cry ‘Six million of our brothers are dying in Europe [by the acts, according to circumstance, of Poland, the Balkan countries, Tsarist Russia, National-Socialist Germany…]; we await your money for the victims of this holocaust [sic already in 1919]!”
Manuel Valls, our Prime Minister, and François Hollande, President of our Republic, devote themselves to launching, in several foreign countries, warlike crusades of the kind that have backfired horribly for us French this year. To proceed as they do, contrary to the Constitution, they dispense with the approval of Parliament, either in advance or within forty days from the start of operations. On top of their foreign wars, conducted in the most cowardly as well as the most comfortable conditions, they instil an atmosphere of internecine war at home. They call ‘cowards” certain enemies who, after all, are inspired on a grand scale by the practices of our glorious Résistants: ‘Hey, killers with the bullet and the knife, kill quickly!” If François Hollande has the stature of a pedalo admiral, Mr Valls resembles Picrochole, that character in Rabelais whose Greek name means ‘bitter bile” and who regularly gets all excited at the prospect of going off to war. Mr Valls began with a crusade against the Saracens of today and against the real or supposed enemies of Israel but he is also on a campaign against the revisionists, against ‘Dieudonné in peace”, against Marine Le Pen even though she has pushed her own father down the stairs and even against his friends of the Socialist clan. A good suggestion for him would be to calm down, take care of himself, try to laugh with Dieudonné, reflect for a moment with the revisionists, allow historians or researchers to work as they wish and, at long last, spare us the flag-waving frenzy, the bugle-blowing, the verse and chorus of the Marseillaise on the ‘day of glory”, the ‘impure blood” and the ‘ferocious soldiers”. As we know, it is, unhappily, all too easy to take the French in with that sort of thing.
Such, today, are the modest New Year wishes for 2016 that I allow myself to make for that person, for his victims, for the French and for the rest of the world. But is it perhaps already asking too much?
For their part, the revisionists know what awaits them: the confirmation in the mainstream media, sooner or later, that they have already won a total victory on the historical and scientific level. The political and media powers will indeed have to resign themselves to the facts: persistence in gunboat policies abroad and in those of gagging and censorship at home will only dishonour them a bit more. For nothing.
The rising flood, particularly on the Internet, that is bringing to the world’s knowledge the spectacular achievements of historical revisionism is not suddenly going to halt its advance or return towards its source.
The lies of ‘the Holocaust” are modelled on those of the First World War. All those ‘Nazi death-works”, like the ones at Auschwitz, are but a reprise of the myth of German ‘corpse factories” of 1914-1918. They were merely modernised by the adding of gas (Jewish-American version of November 1944) and sometimes of electricity (Jewish-Soviet version of February 1945). The good people, already generally not well disposed towards the practice of cremating the dead, were led to believe that Germany, a nation considered modern and known for having an abundance of engineers and chemists, had built structures containing, in addition to a cremation space, others called ‘gas chambers” (in reality, the ‘depositories”, Leichenhalle or Leichenkeller, technically designed to hold bodies awaiting cremation). Thus a certain propaganda has managed to persuade us that those Germans devils were dumb enough to house under the same roof, on one side, spaces full of a highly inflammable and explosive gas (the hydrocyanic acid or hydrogen cyanide contained in the pesticide Zyklon B, created in the 1920s) and, on the other side, crematory ovens that had to be laboriously brought to a temperature of 900° C.
Germar Rudolf
In 1943 some of the men in charge of British war propaganda deplored ‘this gas chambers story”. For his part, the revisionist Germar Rudolf sums up the subject rather well in his Lectures on the Holocaust (Chicago, Theses & Dissertations Press, 2005, 566 p., p. 82-85). Even Victor Cavendish-Bentinck, a senior official of the Intelligence Service in London ready to believe just about any nonsense said against the Germans, was to write: ‘I feel certain that we are making a mistake in publicly giving credence to this gas chambers story” (p. 83). The trouble was that the British, undisputed champions of lying propaganda during the two world wars, needed those fables. On February 29, 1944 their Ministry of Information sent the BBC and the Church of England a circular letter of the greatest cynicism, requesting their respective cooperation for the spreading of propaganda on the basis of atrocity stories either already in circulation or currently being concocted. It was a matter of forestalling the disastrous effect that the Red Army, an ally, was inevitably to bring about in Central Europe by real atrocities (p. 84)! On these inventions, these fabrications and the wide-scale dissemination of enormous tall tales, two books remain of great interest: Edward J. Rozek’s Allied Wartime Diplomacy: A Pattern in Poland, New York, Wiley, 1958 and, especially, by Walter Laqueur (a Jew born in Breslau in 1921): The Terrible Secret, London, Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1980, 262 p., wherein we see Cavendish-Bentinck, him again, ‘Chairman of the British Intelligence Committee”, writing in July 1943 that ‘The Poles and, to a far greater extent the Jews, tend to exaggerate German atrocities in order to stoke us up” (p. 83).
Fifteen months ago, referring to the crisis that the historians of ‘the Holocaust” were experiencing, I wrote that there was ‘more and more water in their gas, and slack in their knotted rope”. Since January 2015 and the anniversary of the ‘liberation” of Auschwitz I have noted a sudden acceleration of the phenomenon. I have a whole file and a whole demonstration on the subject but the continuing judicial repression has not yet left me time to publish this information. In any case, for the historian, it has become captivating to observe the never-ending agony of the ‘magical gas chamber” (Céline in 1950). This agony is accompanied, as we have seen, by a redoubling of the repression of revisionism and a turning up of the volume of holocaustic propaganda. May our Picrochole refrain, then, from going on the stage and into a trance! He would have a stroke. He might even be cruelly snatched away from us. Who knows? He could precede in death a man who will be 87 years of age on January 25, 2016 and whom some have, thus far in vain, so often sought to kill, not for his ideas (he has hardly any) but for having wanted to publish the result of his research, which is summed up in a phrase of about sixty words. I repeat it here for memory, and to have done with it:

Germar Rudolf
The alleged Hitlerite gas chambers and the alleged genocide of the Jews form one and the same historical lie, which has permitted a gigantic political and financial swindle whose main beneficiaries are the state of Israel and international Zionism and whose main victims are the German people but not their leaders and the Palestinian people in their entirety.
Note: For sources or references especially regarding certain points of this text one may consult the indices of the seven volumes of my Ecrits révisionnistes thus far published. On the Internet, for ‘The Victories of Revisionism” (11 December 2006), see and for ‘The Victories of Revisionism (continued)” (September 11, 2011), see
Aficionados of court rulings by imbeciles are invited to refer to pages 152-155 of the first volume, where there are some titbits from a decision handed down in 1979 by Dame Baluze-Frachet, judge of a Lyon police court. The good lady decreed back then that simply asking the question of the existence of the gas chambers was an affront not only to ‘good morals” but also to ‘the moral order”. The amusing bit of it is that by invoking ‘the moral order” she was advocating although probably unawares a value dear to count MacMahon, Marshal of France, President of the French Republic and perennial model of reactionary conservatism. ‘The moral order” was to return seventy years later on with… Marshal Pétain. As for the aficionados of behavioural curiosities, there is fare for them in the following two videos featuring the current head of the French government: ‘The left hand of Manuel Valls” and ‘Rally of March 19, 2014 speech by Manuel Valls, Minister of the Interior”.
In preparation: 1) an article about an embarrassing secret of Serge Klarsfeld; 2) a study of the highly inflammable and explosive nature of hydrogen cyanide.

{ Comments are closed }

The desperate search for Guy Montag by John Kaminski


Guy Montag, Guy Montag, you think, tapping your fingers on your desk. Where have we heard that name before? Suddenly you remember.
He was the conflicted hero in arguably the most famous science fiction story of all time, something almost everybody in America read in school, and marveled over its frightful foresight. Guy Montag was the enigmatic fireman who burned outlawed books in Ray Bradbury’s epic novel Fahrenheit 451.
One day a woman chose to die with her books. But before she immolated herself, Guy stole a book from her to try to learn why she should do such a thing. Then Guy started smuggling books home. His suicidal wife turned him in to the authorities. When they came to burn down HIS house, Guy turned on his chief, sprayed him with fire, and burned him to a crisp. Following that, Guy escaped and lived with the impoverished intellectual hobos, with the hopeful aim of restoring sanity to a deranged society.
In a series of ironic twists years after it was written, small minded school boards tried to ban Fahrenheit 451 without ever realizing they were unwittingly mimicking the book’s plot — destroying books society has been persuaded not to read because their thoughts were too dangerous.
Bradbury’s narrative describes how Montag gradually began to doubt his mission after he saw how important books were to people willing to die rather than give them up, and his brittle life crumbled around him. When the book’s hero changed his mind about books and what he should be doing to them, he brought the power of the totalitarian state down upon him, before escaping into the shadows and yearning for revolution.
Bradbury never mentioned how that revolution turned out, but the future has revealed an uncanny twist in what the famous science fiction author wrote and the way reality has turned out.
Firemen are supposed to put fires out, but Bradbury’s firemen burned books the government deemed illegal.
This is how our future has progressed; what was once the truth is now a lie. Suddenly, forces once thought necessary and beneficial have now turned into their opposite — a destructive menace.
Think cops killing people’s pets while trying to bust somebody at the wrong address. Or a woman pulled over for not signaling a lane change winds up a few hours later supposedly hanging herself in the cell of a local jail.
Politicians and presidents preach for peace yet incinerate defenseless foreign countries while insisting they are killing innocent people to preserve freedom. It’s the modern variation of the old Vietnam proverb: We had to destroy the village in order to save it.
What is the shocking reversal dominating society today? It should be obvious to you. It’s the false flag syndrome, in which the government creates disasters that it then cleans up and boasts how efficiently and vigilantly it has protected the population. The list of FBI provocations reveals there would be practically no crime at all if not for the sadistic schemes like Oklahoma City and 9/11 that our government cooks up.
Firemen who burn things rather than extinguish them are exactly the opposite of the way things should work in a normal world. Most of us know by now the world is nowhere near normal.
Instead of trying to protect us, the police are killing us in record numbers, and then refusing to say how many they’ve killed, or why.
Today, judges ostensibly profess to protect the rights of individuals but consistently rule in favor of big businesses that demolish these very rights. Instead of seeking justice in courts, the judges and the lawyers are deciding how they can fleece and convict us to fulfill the contracts they have with the private prison corporations to keep the jails full.
And as we have seen most recently in Oregon, the government wants to put us in jail in order to take our land because that land contains valuable minerals that our bellicose bigwigs want to sell to the very corporations that provide the campaign finances that keep them in office. As long as the Hammonds are in jail, we are all incarcerated.
I think the thing that got me thinking about this reversal of intent was the discovery that bodies supposedly massacred in a Paris nightclub turned out to be dummies, mannikins, planted by the spinmeisters who arranged the whole hoax to convince the public that the bloody stunt really happened. <>
This kind of ridiculous effort on the part of the authorities fits right in with the Sandy Hook school affair, in which children were claimed to have been killed but no bodies were ever reported being seen by local hospitals. <> It was a prima facie example of the cops who are supposedly assigned to protect us preventing us from knowing about the truth of a major crime.
The Boston Marathon bombing was another government sponsored charade, with one designated patsy murdered in the streets by police and his brother sentenced to die by a kangaroo court without ever being allowed to speak candidly. <>
The conspiracy conducting this long-running political campaign to get people to give up their guns is insidious and seemingly inextinguishable, despite the fact that it only increases gun sales. It includes the entire Jewish controlled media, of course, and journalists and cops at every level willing to participate in scams for which, in the specific case of Sandy Hook, they are sometimes paid millions of dollars for their participation in the charade. <>
Why does the government want us to give up our guns? To put us all in prison and to take everything we own before eventually taking our lives. The process is well underway, as the Hammond family of Oregon knows so well. Ammon Bundy’s supporters bivouacked in a nearby forest know it, too, and despite the media slander that calls them vigilantes are really defending the rest of us from a future nobody really wants to see — total government control of every aspect of our lives.
The heroes who try to reveal government criminality — Edward Snowden, Michael Hastings, Julian Assange, Bill Cooper — are constantly killed or jailed by those who resent their lucrative criminal schemes being exposed.
The doctors who try to circumvent the poisonous medicines of Big Pharma — James Bradstreet, Theresa Sievers, Nicholas Gonzalez— are suicided by those who want to continue to poison their patients and deny life saving techniques and medicines from people who really need them.
But what sticks in my mind is the similarity between Bradbury’s descriptive prediction of firemen doing exactly the opposite of what they were supposed to be doing — putting out fires instead of lighting them — and the behavior of the U.S. military monster today, murdering innocents for totally false reasons, and the intelligence community creating phony terrorist incidents and then prosecuting and convicting innocent patsies to make government agents look good when in reality they are criminals.
As deranged firemen scorched neighborhoods as well as the minds of would be intellects oppressed by their governments, so our military and police today do exactly the opposite of what they have been charged to do — preserve our safety and defend our freedoms.
Instead they intimidate the majority into silence and leave them cringing in silence while secretly hoping to avoid the fickle finger of fate and a violent SWAT team crashing through their front door even though it is the wrong address.
This is not to say there aren’t heroic individuals in the U.S. military. This would account for all the generals the last few presidents have fired for counseling common sense rather the following homicidal orders.
And now happening in Oregon, quasi government agencies of questionable authenticity steal land from legitimate farmers, throw them in jail, and the dumbfounded population stands around with their mouths open, criticizing those who would save farmers from being hoodwinked out of their land and homes by corrupt judges in kangaroo courts. <>
The potential course of the future now depends on the resolve of a small group of patriots gathered in a cold forest sorely lacking in support from the general population. It is no exaggeration to predict that whatever happens to them will happen to the rest of us.
The Jews who run our country are never going to listen to reason and suddenly strive to behave in a reasonable and rational manner. They are going to keep stealing and killing until they are stopped.
The shooting has to start somewhere. Burns, Oregon might be a sensible place to begin.
But the vast majority of Americans don’t want to be bothered with matters of justice. Even as their privately owned land disappears, stolen by the government, they don’t think these issues will affect them. They just sit home and watch TV and wonder what they’ll do when the ATMs stop working and the banks all close.
At exactly the time we need more people to behave like Guy Montag and stop this slide into insanity when truth is what our voracious government says it is, and justice cannot intrude into the consciousness of a citizenry intent on watching TV and texting their friends, we observe an unprecedented turning away from what needs to be done to survive, and misplaced intent leading to the widespread destruction of our species and every other species as well.
Sorry to have to tell you again, but those who sleep now will be the first ones to die in the very near future. Our criminal, Jew-run government must be disenfranchised, detoxified and, where appropriate, disemboweled as soon as possible.
If you must pick a day to start fighting back, today might just be the best choice of all.
John Kaminski is a writer who lives on the Gulf Coast of Florida, constantly trying to figure out why we are destroying ourselves, and pinpointing a corrupt belief system as the engine of our demise. Solely dependent on contributions from readers, please support his work by mail: 6871 Willow Creek Circle #103, North Port FL 34287 USA.

{ Comments are closed }