Month: May 2020

The Case Against Noahide Law


ED Noor: Americans in their current Islamophobic fervor seem to be terrified of the imposition of Shariah Law upon the nation. They are completely unaware that their nation has already been sold over and that their American legal system has been hijacked by the Talmudics and that their once Napoleonic judicial system has been altered into a truly ‘jewdicial system’.
‘On October 16th [2004], president Bush signed into law the global anti-semitism review act, designed to force the entire world into never being critical of the Jews, whatever their actions.
‘This act establishes a special department within the United States state department to monitor global anti-semitism, which is to report annually to congress.
‘This act defines a person as being anti-semitic if they purport any of the following beliefs:
~ Any assertion, ‘that the Jewish community controls government, the media, international business and the financial world.’
~ The expression of, ‘strong anti-Israel sentiment.’
~ Expressing, ‘virulent criticism,’ of Israel’s leaders, past or present. The state department gives an example of this occurring when a swastika is portrayed in a cartoon decrying the behaviour of a past or present Zionist leader.
~ Any criticism of the Jewish religion or its religious leaders or literature with the emphasis on the Talmud and Kabbalah.
~ Any criticism of the United States government and congress for being under undue influence by the Jewish Zionist community, which would include Jewish organisations such as American-Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC).
~ Any criticism of the Jewish-Zionist community for promoting globalism or what some call the, ‘New World Order.’
~ Placing any blame on Jewish leaders and their followers for inciting the Roman crucifixion of Christ.
~ Citing any facts that could in any way diminish the, ‘six million,’ figure of holocaust victims.
~ Claiming that Israel is a racist state.
~ Making any claim that there exists a, ‘Zionist conspiracy.’
~ Offering proof that Jews and their leaders created communism and the bolshevik revolution in Russia.
~ Making, ‘derogatory statements about Jewish persons.’
~ Asserting that spiritually disobedient Jews do not have the biblical right to re-occupy Palestine.
~ Making any allegations of Mossad involvement in the 9/11 attack.
And now, let us get into the nitty gritty of the Noahide Laws, something this blog has been exposing for several years now.
‘All Israelites will have a part in the future world. The Goyim, at the end of the world will be handed over to the angel Duma and sent down to hell’. ~ Zohar, Shemoth, Toldoth Noah, Lekh-Lekha .
Public Law 102-14 is an American Federal law which states that the ‘Seven Noahide Laws’ (Jewish Laws from the Talmud) are the principle on which the United States was founded and that it is the responsibility of America to transmit these ‘ethical values’ to future generation both in the United States and the world. But what are these so-called ‘ethical values’ known as the ‘Seven Noahide Laws’ and what implications do they have for non-Jews?
Public Law 102-14 not only states that the Seven Noahide Laws are the principles upon which the American Nation was founded, it also honors Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson of the Lubavitch Movement (also known as Chabad) as being a ‘great spiritual leader’. According to Rabbi Schneerson, the Noahide Laws are to be kept by force if possible and if not by ‘pleasantness and peace’. This same Rabbi also stated that non-Jews are inferior to Jews, saying that they have ‘satanic souls’ and their lives are worth nothing except as service to Jews. Why would the USA honor such a Rabbi who preaches the most militant form of Noahide Law and who obviously hates non-Jews?
ED Noor: ‘It is our duty to force all mankind to accept the seven Noahide laws, and if not ~ they will be killed.’ ~ Rabbi Yitzhak Ginsburg
After learning about Public Law 102-14 and the Noahide Laws, discriminatory Jewish religious laws which threaten freedom of religion, freedom of speech and sexual expression in the United States and the world, we wanted to learn a little more about modern Jewish opinion on this matter. We are fortunate because in 2008 a book on Noahide Law was published in Jerusalem entitled ‘The Divine Code’. Better still, the book was reviewed by the Chief Rabbinate of Israel. Let’s see what ‘The Divine Code’ and the Chief Rabbis have to say about Noahide Law.
American Public Law 102-14 enshrines the ‘Seven Noahide Laws’ as the ‘ethical values’ upon which the United States was founded. The law also asserts that it is the nation’s ‘responsibility’ to transmit these ‘ethical values’ to the generations of the future. We read in the 1906 Jewish Encyclopedia that under these laws, those who practice other faiths, blaspheme against Judaism or commit ‘adultery’ are to be punished by death and that non-Jews are commanded to set up ‘courts of justice’ to judge the masses upon these laws. It would also seem that the Chief Rabbis of Israel also support the Noahide Laws being commanded upon non-Jews from their blessings upon the 2008 book ‘The Divine Code‘. But where did these ideas about Noahide Law come from? Noahide Law is not some bizarre aberration of Judaism, it is fundamental and central to Jewish cannon. In which Jewish holy book can we find the Noahide Laws? To answer these questions, we need to learn a little about the most important of all Jewish scriptures, The Babylonian Talmud.
Many American find it hard to believe that congress would pass Public Law 102-14 (The Noahide Laws) if they were truly detrimental to the freedoms of non-Jews. Aren’t most people in congress non-Jewish? Why would they pass a law that was against their own interests? According to former congressman Bill Dannemyer (this is not an endorsement of him), Public Law 102-14 was passed on the vote of only four congressmen, when 99% of congress was absent. If his testimony and the testimony of his wife Dr. Day (again, not an endorsement) are accurate, then 99% of congress never voted on Public Law 102-14. Why was such an important proclamation passed with the consent of only 1% of congress?
ED Noor: By Congressman Dannemyer serving at the time. An excellent read. Basically they passed this using the same conniving methods they utilized when signing the Federal Reserve Act back in 1903.
Ever since the Jewish Talmudic Noahide Laws were introduced into the American legal system back in 1991, some members of the Jewish legal community have been using deceptive practices and outright lies to introduce Jewish Talmudic Laws into the Supreme Court, particularly in the area of capital punishment and execution law. Execution is a legal issue of importance to those seeking to implement Noahide Law in the United States since Noahide Law calls for the decapitation of anyone who practices ‘idolatry’ (which includes Christianity) or blasphemes the Jewish god. Here we will briefly discuss which organizations are infiltrating the Supreme Court, preparing it for the acceptance of Talmudic Law and how they are deceiving the public into accepting Talmudic execution laws (particularly decapitation) in the United States.
ED Noor: Bush Jr. Signing this infamous duplicitous law which had nothing to do with education and everything to do with signing in the Rebbe’s dream of establishing the Noahide Laws in America.
This photo provided by the Supreme Court shows President Bush, left, meeting with members of the Supreme Court during the investiture ceremony of Chief Justice John Roberts, second from right, in the Chief Justice’s Conference Room at the court in Washington, Monday, Oct. 3, 2005. From left are, the president, Justices John Paul Stevens, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, David Souter, Antonin Scalia, Roberts, and Justice Sandra Day O’Connor. (AP Photo/Ken Heinen, Pool)
This photo provided by the Supreme Court shows President Bush, left, meeting with members of the Supreme Court during the investiture ceremony of Chief Justice John Roberts, second from right, in the Chief Justice’s Conference Room at the court in Washington, Monday, Oct. 3, 2005. From left are, the president, Justices John Paul Stevens, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, David Souter, Antonin Scalia, Roberts, and Justice Sandra Day O’Connor. (AP Photo/Ken Heinen, Pool)
The Jews of America and Zionist Israel have not been satisfied with simply enshrining their supremacist, virulent and dangerous Noahide Laws into the United States government via Public Law 102-14. They have been working steadily to further encroach their Talmudic hegemony into the US, and they have won over our Presidents and Supreme Court Justices.
On November 5th, 2002 a Kosher dinner was held at the Supreme Court to celebrate the launch of the International Institute for Judaic Law (IIJL) [currently defunct]. This kosher dinner was attended by three of the Supreme Court Justice, Ruth Bader Ginsberg, Stephen Breyer, and Antonin Scalia, some of whom provided their letters of approval to the founder of the institute, Chabad-Lubavitch Rabbi Dr. Noson Gurary. President George W. Bush also sent his greetings and approval for the institute and Jewish Law.
One of the stated purposes of IIJL was to promote the application of Jewish Law and Philosophy in contemporary society. The Jewish Noahide Laws and Philosophy of the Talmud are inherently biased against non-Jews, promoting their general second-class citizenship and even extermination, so why is the President of the USA and Supreme Court giving credence to such an Jewish supremacist legal system?
When Americans learn about Public Law 102-14 and the Noahide Laws, many are quick to dismiss the threat because ‘Israel is a secular nation’ and would never push for religious laws… how far this is from the truth!
Today, Jews and their supporters drum the misconception that Israel is a ‘secular sate’. Israel is a ‘Jewish sate’, a Zionist state, a religious state and this is very obvious from Israel’s legal system. The nation of Israel has no constitution, on purpose, because this would force the nation to choose between ‘secularism’ and halacha (Jewish Law). Israel does however have state appointed and funded Rabbis and Rabbinical Courts. The Rabbis of Israel have gained control of and have implemented religious law in the sectors of marriage, divorce and adoption and are seeking to develop greater influence over the nation’s military and education sectors. A nation which does not have a constitution of secularism but does have state religious figures with legal powers is not a ‘secular state’; it is a pseudo-theocracy at best. Surprisingly, recent polls have suggested that support for Halacha law over democracy is very high within the nation of Israel.
When criticizing the international Jewish legal system known as Noahide Law (Public Law 102-14 in America), one is often accused of being ‘anti-Semitic’. To call someone an ‘anti-Semite’ implies they have issues with ‘Semitic’ people, and thus you are equating them with being something akin to a racist. It can be stated that Noahide Law is just that, a law, and so opposing this law is no less ‘racist’ than opposing Islamic Sharia law or Communism. A legal text is not a group or people, it is not an ethnicity, and it is not a race, so to oppose it cannot be ‘anti-Semitic’. However, there is a deeper question that needs to be answered here, are Jew’s really a race or ethnicity? When we look at modern laws in Israel, Jewish theology, and claims by modern Jewish geneticists, we can see that Judaism has been conflated with ‘Semitism’, they are not the same thing.
Criticism of Noahide Law and Judaism in general has nothing to do with hatred for any race or ethnicity, it has to do with opposing deleterious ideology, nothing more, nothing less.
When many Christian learn about Noahide Law and the Talmud, they wrongly believe that the injunctions against ‘heathens’ do not apply to them. Little do Christians know that according to Jewish Law, to be Christian is worse than being a ‘heathen’ since Christians are considered ‘heretics’ and ‘apostates’. Indeed, according to the Talmud, becoming Christian is one of the worst sins one can commit, and Jesus himself is harshly admonished for being a sorcerer, blasphemer and a whore monger.
ED Noor: The seven Noahide laws, as traditionally enumerated are:
Do Not Deny God
Do Not Blaspheme God
Do Not Murder
Do Not Engage in Incestuous, Adulterous or Homosexual Relationships
Do Not Steal
Do Not Eat of a Live Animal
Establish Courts/Legal System to Ensure Law Obedience
Should the LGBTQ community be worried about Public Law 102-14 and the Jewish Noahide Laws? Absolutely. According to traditional interpretations of Noahide Law, the law against ‘adultery’ includes homosexuality, and like adulterers, homosexuals would be killed under Noahide Law. The Talmud is full of commands to kill homosexuals, classing them with persons who have sex with animals.
Non-Jews accused of homosexuality could be executed at any time in a Noahide court upon the testimony of one witness and upon the verdict of just one judge; Jews on the other hand would need two witnesses to their ‘crime’ of homosexuality and could not be executed unless they were brought before a panel of 71 judges (the Sanhedrin). Further, some Rabbis of the Talmud make prejudicial assumptions, stating that Jews are generally not thought to practice homosexuality, thus providing Jews with a biased favor before the court. Talmudic Law obviously has an inherent bias against non-Jews who have been accused of this so-called ‘sin’ and non-Jewish LGBTQs are obviously in greater danger of persecution under Noahide Law than Jewish LGBTQs.
Adultery is a ‘crime’ under Jewish Noahide Law, one for which non-Jews are to be decapitated. But what is the Jewish definition of adultery? Many might be surprised to learn that under usual circumstance, only a woman can be accused of adultery under Jewish Law, while Jewish men are free to engage in extramarital sex and keep sex slaves, even having sex with non-Jewish infants as young as three years old.
Meanwhile, woman only accused of adultery were stripped naked and put on public display during the Talmudic times. Are these the type of ‘morals’ we want in the USA (Public Law 102-14) or around the world? While many will point to the fact that such practices are not taking place today, according to Halachic material, this is only because current Israeli society has been corrupted by foreign influence (as during Roman times), something that Noahide advocates are working to correct.
One of the Seven Noahide Laws is ‘do not murder’; who could disagree with that? Well, it depends on your definition of murder. According to the Jewish Law of the Talmud, there is no penalty for killing a person indirectly, thus Jewish law provides provisions for killing others (even other Jews) via starvation, exposure, suffocation, and more. But, this principle only applies to Jews. Non-Jews who commit these same crimes are sentenced to death. Noahide Law (Public Law 102-14) is inherently biased in favor of Jews, and resembles nothing close to what would be considered common morality or ethics.
ED Noor: Read about The King’s Torah, a modern Israeli publication by several prominent rabbis.
One of the Seven Noahide Laws from the Jewish Talmud is ‘Do Not Steal’. That sounds pretty reasonable right? But did you know that according to the Talmud Jews are given full permission to steal from non-Jews? And don’t forget, Jews are not prosecuted for stealing small amounts of money, but non-Jews are.
Members of the modern Sanhedrin in Israel.
The seventh and final law of the Seven Noahide Laws (Public Law 102-14) is to ‘appoint courts of justice’. But what kind of American courts would uphold Jewish law? According to the reputable Jewish legal source, the Mishneh Torah (aka Rambam) written by the famous Jewish scholar Maimonides, non-Jews are to set up ‘theocratic courts’ whose judges are learned in ‘Torah’ and who do no ‘pervert’ the law with secular logic.
Non-Jews who fail to set up theocratic Jewish courts in their nations are subjected to mass execution. If this were not enough, it may (or may not) be required for non-Jews to appoint theocratic kings among themselves who will ensure that the nation is upholding Noahide Law. The United States was founded upon the principle of separation of Church and State, so what is such a law as Public Law 102-14 doing in our federal legal system?
The very first of The Seven Jewish Noahide Laws (American Public Law 102-14) is ‘No Idolatry’. Well most people don’t bow before graven images, so does it really matter if such practices are outlawed? ‘Idolatry’ under Jewish Noahide Law encompasses much much more than simply banning people from bowing before statues.
According to Jewish legal scholars, to avoid ‘idolatry’, one must:
~ accept Jewish Torah;
~ accept Jewish prophets and teachers;
~ and give obedience to Jewish courts.
~ Also, one must not accept non-Jewish scriptures;
~ not follow non-Jewish prophets or priests.
All non-Jewish religious temples and paraphernalia are to be destroyed and any attempts to proselytize a non-Jewish religion will lead to execution. In addition, under the Noahide Law which abolishes ‘idolatry’, non-Jews can be executed for doing something as simple as consulting astrologers or getting a tattoo. Finally, non-Jews are commanded to not love those who practice idolatry and to even hate them.
ED Noor: ‘MAY’ have racist UNDERtones!? See images above.
Public Law 102-14 in the United States and the Jewish Noahide Laws are of concern to all non-Jews. The Noahide Laws are rules created by Jews for non-Jews, and these rules relegate us to a 2nd class status. But there are layers to this 2nd class citizenship for non-Jews under Jewish Talmudic law.
Did you know that according to the Talmud, the same book which gives us the Noahide Laws, that African people are considered to be cursed? That’s right, according to the Talmud the ‘negro’ race was produced through a curse on Noah’s son Ham. Since it is the Talmud which informs Noahide Law in general, and it is from Jewish Talmudists that we are informed on the laws, it is certainly possible that some of this Talmudic racism could bleed through, infecting the already nefarious Noahide Laws with a new layer of hate, anti-African racism. Anti-African racism in Israel might be a good indicator for the temper in which Rabbis might promote the Noahide Law among non-Jews.
When speaking about Noahide Law with either Jews or Noahides, sometimes a person who is either misinformed or even willingly trying to deceive you will proclaim that there is no reason to worry about Noahide Law since according to Jewish theology, no ‘Ger Toshav’ can be accepted at this time. According to Jewish Law, a ‘Ger Toshav’ can only be accepted during a time when the nation of Israel has instated a holiday called the Jubilee, and the modern nation of Israel has not done this. However, this logic is deceptive, since the speaker is either accidentally or intentionally conflating a ‘Noahide’ with a ‘Ger Toshav’, they are not the same thing!

‘Happy will be the lost of Israel, whom the Holy One, blessed be He, has chosen from amongst the Goyim, of whom the Scriptures say: ’Their work is but vanity, it is an illusion at which we must laugh, they will all perish when God visits them in His wrath.’ At the moment when the Holy One, blessed be He, will exterminate all the Goyim of the world, Israel alone will subsist, even as it is written: ‘‘The Lord alone will appear great on that day! …’’ ~ Zohar, Vayshlah 177b
‘It is the law to kill anyone who denies the Torah. The Christians belong to the denying ones of the Torah.’ ~ Coschen hamischpat 425 Hagah 425. 5
‘Although the non-Jew has the same body structure as the Jew, they compare with the Jew like a monkey to a human.’ ~ Schene luchoth haberith, p. 250 b
Rosh Hashanah 17a. Christians (minnim) and others who reject the Talmud will go to hell and be punished there for all generations.
Minor Tractates. Soferim 15, Rule 10. This is the saying of Rabbi Simon ben Yohai: Tob shebe goyyim harog ~‘Even the best of the gentiles should all be killed’.
Filed Under: Noahide Law, Noor al-Haqiqa, Snippits and Snappits
Glenn Shumway says:
January 19, 2016 at 10:06 pm
The Truth about the ‘Noahide Laws’…
NOTE: This article is published anonymously, the authors having previously received anonymous death threats over the phone for publishing similar opinions. Permission is hereby granted to any and all who would re-publish it to do so. The electronic format is graphic PDF so that the content may not be easily altered.
Background . . .
The so-called ‘Noahide’ laws appear nowhere in the written Hebrew Tanakh (what Christians condescendingly call the ‘Old Testament’). They do appear, in great detail, in the Jewish Talmud.
The Talmud is today’s ‘print version’ of what was originally an ‘oral tradition’ of the Pharisees and Sadducees in Yeshua’s time, what he chastised them for as obeying the ‘commandments/doctrines of men’, or ‘traditions of men’, instead of the written Torah of YHVH. (Isaiah 29:13; Mark 7:7) The Talmud represents the ultimate Satanic corruption of what YHVH intended Judaism to be, and as He explained in crystal clear detail to the assembled children of Israel at Mt. Sinai.
The identical corruption has derailed much of ‘Christianity’ through the deceptions of the Roman Catholic Church and all of her daughter whores (Revelation 17:5), the so-called ‘Protestant’ denominations. This common corruption is a manifestation of ‘Mystery Babylon’, the name of Satan’s worldwide spiritual kingdom on the earth (2 Corinthians 4:4), and it is from the period of the Jews’ captivity in physical Babylon that the Talmud admittedly springs. And it has effectively replaced the written Torah of Moses in the lives of most who call themselves ‘Jews’.
The Talmud: Heart’s Blood of the Jewish Faith, was the heading of the 11/17/1959 installment of ‘This Is My God’, a bestseller book by author Herman Wouk (The Caine Mutiny, Marjorie Morningstar, The Winds of War, Youngblood Hawke, Please Don’t Stop the Carnival) which ran serially in the New York Herald-Tribune. To quote:
‘The TALMUD is to this day the circulating heart’s blood of the Jewish religion. Whatever laws, customs or ceremonies we observe whether we are orthodox, Conservative, Reform or merely spasmodic sentimentalists-we follow the TALMUD.
It is our common law.’
[Remember this?Christians.]
The Noahide laws appear as such only in the Talmud, which is the so-called ‘holy book’ used by the overwhelming majority of Jewish rabbis today, in the same way that Christians use the entire Bible. The problem with this is that the Talmud is nothing but a collection of the 100% human opinions of rabbis concerning the Law (Torah), the Prophets (Nevi’im) and the Writings (Ketuvim) and the myriad convoluted ways they have contrived to avoid obeying the written Torah of YHVH.
And no wonder, seeing that the Tanakh (Christian ‘Old Testament’) is mostly a running commentary on YHVH Elohim’s opinion of the ancestors of the Jews and how their continuing idolatries have absolved Him of any responsibility to keep His conditional covenants with the people of Israel as a race. Nevertheless, He has promised to keep His covenant with ‘the children of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob’, but only with a righteous remnant of that group.
‘And at that time shall Michael stand up, the great prince who stands for the children of your people: and there shall be a time of trouble, such as never was since there was a nation until that same time: and at that time your people shall be delivered, every one that shall be found written in the book.’ [Daniel 12:1]
There is only one ‘the book’ which has to do with salvation, and that is the Lamb’s Book of Life (Revelation 21:27). Having one’s name in it is a matter of one’s personal righteousness before the God of the Bible, and no one who considers the Talmud as good for anything has any chance at that status, as we will show. The Talmud contains some of the most virulent hate literature ever written, plus every manner of obscenity and rabbinical permission to Jews to commit unlimited atrocities against Gentiles, simply because they believe themselves to be ‘the chosen people’ of YHVH, no matter what they do, and all in direct contravention of what our Lord Yeshua called ‘the Law and the Prophets’!
It is impossible for any truly begotten-again disciple of Yeshua of Nazareth to also ‘be’ a Noahide, since the Talmudic ‘Jews’ believe today, as they did in Yeshua’s day, that Yeshua haMaschiach was a false Messiah, and reverence of him AS the Promised One to be a sin worthy of death. Therefore, the ‘Noahide laws’ are actually nothing more than a thinly-veiled Jewish ruse to try to deceive Christians into believing that they can somehow be ‘reconciled’ to rabbinic Judaism. All one has to do to be accepted by the rabbis is agree to abandon whatever religious beliefs and practices they may have been observing, such as Christianity, and follow the ‘Noahide Laws’ instead. Simple, no?
No. Under rabbinic Jewish halakha law, the penalty for a Gentile’s (non-Jew’s) failure to do so is decapitation, and that sentence may be carried out based on the unsupported accusation of but a single Jew, which is itself a violation of the written Torah. (Deuteronomy 17:6)
Much of the Talmud is virulently anti-Gentile, and especially anti-Christian. Here are a few sample quotes from the Talmud (English Soncino Edition):
1. ‘The teachings of the Talmud stand above all other laws. They are more important than the laws of Moses.’ -Rabbi Issael, Rabbi Chasbar, et. al.
2. ‘The decisions of the Talmud are words of the living God. God Himself asks the opinion of the earthly rabbis when there are difficult affairs in heaven.’ -Rabbi Menechen Commentary on Fifth Book
3. ‘God Himself studies the Talmud standing, he has such respect for that book.’ -Tract Mechillo
4. ‘It is more wicked to question the words of the rabbis than those of the Torah.’ -Mischna Sanhedryn 11:3
5. ‘It is forbidden to disclose the secrets of the oral law. He who would do it would be as guilty as though he destroyed the whole world.’ -Jektat Chadasz, 171, 3
6. ‘Every non-Jew who studies the Talmud and every Jew who helps him in it, ought to die.’ -Sanhedryn, 59a, Aboda Zarah 8-6, Szagiga 13
7. ‘To communicate anything to a non-Jew about our religious relations would be equal to the killing of all Jews, for if the non-Jew knew what we teach about them they would kill us openly.’ -Libbre David 37
8. ‘If a Jew be called upon to explain any part of the rabbinic books, he ought to give only a false explanation. Who ever will violate this order shall be put to death.’ -Libbre David 37
9. ‘A Jew should and must make a false oath when the non-Jew asks if our books contain anything against them.’ -Szaaloth-Utszabot, The Book of Jore 17
10. ‘The Jews are human beings, but the nations of the world are not human beings but beasts…’ -Saba Mecia 114, 6
11. ‘When the Messiah comes every Jew will have 2800 slaves.’ -Simeon Haddarsen, fol. 56-D
12. ‘God created the non-Jew in human form so that the Jew would not have to be served by beasts. The non-Jew is consequently an animal in human form, and condemned to serve the Jew day and night.’ -Midrasch Talpioth, p. 225-L
13. ‘As soon as the King Messiah will declare himself, He will destroy Rome and make a wilderness of it. Thorns and weeds will grow in the Pope’s palace. Then He will start a merciless war on non-Jews and will overpower them. He will slay them in masses, kill their kings and lay waste the whole Roman land. He will say to the Jews: ‘I am the King Messiah for whom you have been waiting. Take the silver and gold from the non-Jew.’ ’ -Josiah 60, 6. Rabbi Abarbanel to Daniel 7, 13
14. ‘A Gentile girl who is three years old can be sexually violated.’ Aboda Zarah 37a
15. ‘A Jew may violate but not marry a non-Jewish girl.’ -&ad. Shas. 2:2
16. ‘A Jew may do to a non-Jewess what he can do. He may treat her as he treats a piece of meat.’ -Hadarine, 20, B; Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 348
17. ‘A Jew may misuse the non-Jewess in her state of unbelief.’ -Maimonides, Jak. Chasaka 2:2
18. ‘If a non-Jew kills a non-Jew or a Jew he is responsible; but if a Jew kills a non-Jew he is NOT responsible.’ -Tosefta Aboda 8, 5
19. ‘It is permitted to kill a Jewish denunciator everywhere. It is permitted to kill him even before he denounces.’ -Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 348
20. ‘Thou shalt not do injury to thy neighbor, but it is not said, ‘Thou shalt not do injury to a non-Jew.’ ’ -Mishna Sanhedryn 57
21. ‘When you go to war do not go as the first, but as the last, so that you may return as the first. Five things has Canaan [the Jew living in a Gentile society] recommended to his sons: ‘Love each other, love robbery, hate your masters and never tell the truth.’ ’ -Pesachis F. 113B
22. ‘A Jew is permitted to rape, cheat and perjure himself; but he must take care that he is not found out, so that Israel may not suffer.’ -Schulchan Aruch, Iore Dia
23. ‘A Jew may rob a non-Jew that is, he may cheat him in a bill, if unlikely to be perceived by him.’ -Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 348
24. ‘If a non-Jew wants a Jew to stand witness against a Jew in a Court of Law, and if the Jew could give fair evidence, he is forbidden to do it; but if a Jew wants a Jew to be a witness in a similar case against a non-Jew, he may do it.’ -Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 28, Art. 3 and 4
25. ‘Those who do not confess the Torah and the Prophets must be killed. Who has the power to kill them, let them kill them openly with the sword. if not, let them use artifices, till they are done away with.’ -Schulchan Aruch. Choszen Hamiszpat 425.5
26. ‘All property of other nations belongs to the Jewish nation, which, consequently, is entitled to seize upon it without any scruples. An orthodox Jew is not bound to observe principles of morality towards people of other tribes. He may act contrary to morality, if profitable to himself or to Jews in general’ ’ -Schulchan Aruch. Choszen Hamiszpat 348
27. ‘Should a Jew inform the non-Jewish authorities that another Jew has much money, and the other will suffer a loss through it, he must give him emuneration.’ -Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 388
28. ‘How to interpret the word ‘robbery.’ A non-Jew is forbidden to steal, rob, or take women slaves, etc., from a non-Jew or from a Jew. But a Jew is NOT forbidden to do all this to a non-Jew.’ -Tosefta, Aboda Zara, 5
29. ‘On the house of the non-Jew one looks as on the fold of cattle.’ -Tosefta, Erebin, 1
30. ‘All vows, oaths, promises, engagements, and swearing, which, beginning this very day or reconciliation till the next day of reconciliation, we intend to vow, promise, swear, and bind ourselves to fulfill, we repent of beforehand; let them be illegalized, acquitted, annihilated, abolished, valueless, unimportant. Our vows shall be no vows, and our oaths no oaths at all.’ -Schulchan Aruch, Edit. 1, 136. The Jewish Kol Nidre ‘All Vows’ Oath has been set to a morbid Jewish music, and is often heard on the radio. It is sung as a chant at each Yom Kippur (Jewish New Year service). [[ Most importantly, we ask why anyone who professes to be a rabbinic Jew of any sort should be elected to any public office, or promoted to any executive position, since their ‘religion’ requires them to take FALSE OATHS, and to LIE whenever it is in the interests of ‘Judaism’ for them to do so! WHY?]]
31. ‘Everything a Jew needs for his church ritual no non-Jew is permitted to manufacture, but only a Jew, because this must be manufactured by human beings and the Jew is not permitted to consider the non-Jew as human beings.’ -Schulchan Aruch, Aruch Chaim 14, 20, 32, 33, 39. Talmud Jebamoth 61
32. ‘A Jewish mid-wife is not only permitted but she is compelled to help a Jewish mother on Saturday (Jewish Sabbath) and when so doing to do anything which otherwise would desecrate the Saturday. But it is forbidden to help a non-Jewish woman even if it should be possible to help her without desecrating the Saturday, because she is to be considered only as an animal.’ -Schulchan Aruch, Aruch Chaim 330
33. ‘At the time of the Cholhamoed the transaction of any kind of business is forbidden. But it is permitted to cheat a non-Jew, because cheating of non-Jew at any time pleases the Lord.’ -Schulchan Aruch, Aruch Chaim 539
34. ‘The Jews are strictly forbidden to cheat their brothers and it is considered cheating already if one-sixth of the value has been taken away from him. Whoever has cheated his brother has to return it to him. Naturally all that only holds towards the Jew, to cheat a non-Jew is permitted and he is not permitted to return to him what he cheated him out of. Because the Bible says: ‘Thou shalt not cheat thy next brother,’ but the non-Jews are not our brethren, but as mentioned above, worse than dogs.’ -Baruch Choszen Hamiszpat 227
We realize that this is hard to believe, so we urge the reader to do some research on your own. A simple internet search on ‘Talmud’ will turn up any number of sites devoted to exposing this ‘holy book’ of the Jews for what it really is: racist hate literature.
More Jewish Propaganda . . .
Certain Jews today continually use such religious and impressive sounding words as ‘the Jewish faith,’ ‘the Jewish people/religion/race,’ ‘Jewish spiritual values,’ ‘Jewish religious doctrines,’ and the like, which are designed to deceive and lead the ignorant into mindless compliance with their plans. Behind this mask of contrived pseudo-religiosity stands a complete plan for world government, world power, world conquest, a Jewish kingdom of this world, the total destruction of Christianity and all true believers right along with it. It is the meat and substance of Hassidic Jewry, which is Pharisaic Talmudism, and ultimately, Pre-Millennial (prior to Messiah’s return) Zionism.
‘Jewish Talmudism owes its existence today to the indifference with which it is regarded by the Christian community. The Jew is prejudiced against the Bible, doing what he can to destroy public honor of the Book.’ (The International Jew, Vol. III, p. 16).
‘I am devoting my lecture in this seminar to a discussion of the possibility that we are now entering a Jewish century, a time when the spirit of the community, the non-ideological blend of the emotional and rational and the resistance to categories and forms will emerge through the forces of anti-nationalism to provide us with a new kind of society. I call this process the Judaization of Christianity because Christianity will be the vehicle through which this society becomes Jewish.’ (Rabbi Martin Siegel, New York Magazine, p. 32, January 18, 1972)
When studied carefully, we can clearly see in all four Gospels the racial, political, and religious clash between Yeshua Messiah and his devoted Judean followers together with the written Law of Moses versus the Babylonian Pharisees (the ‘Jews,’ and their ‘Oral Law’, which eventually became the Talmud). This intense, never-ending conflict is the defining feature of the struggle between early, first-hand Christian truth and its satanic counterfeit, that of Talmudic Judaism the same battle which still continues unabated to this very day.
‘For you, brethren, became followers of the churches of God which in Judæa are in Messiah Yeshua: for you also have suffered like things from your own countrymen, even as they have of the Jews, who both killed the Lord Yeshua, and their own prophets, and have persecuted us; and they please not God, and are contrary to all men.’ [Words of the Apostle Sha’ul/Paul, himself a Pharisee: 1 Thessalonians 2:14-15]
The late Jewish academic Professor Israel Shahak, in his classic study Jewish History, Jewish Religion, gives an example: ‘In 1962 a part of the Maimonidean Code … the so-called ‘Book of Knowledge,’ which contains the most basic rules of Jewish faith and practice, was published in Jerusalem in a bilingual edition, with the English translation facing the Hebrew text. The latter has been restored to its original purity, and the command to exterminate Jewish infidels appears in it in full: ‘It is a duty to exterminate them with one’s own hands.’ In the English translation this is somewhat softened to: ‘It is a duty to take active measures to destroy them.’
But then the Hebrew text goes on to specify the prime examples of ‘infidels’ who must be exterminated: ‘Such as Yeshua of Nazareth and his pupils, and Tzadoq and Baitos [the founders of the Sadducean sect] and their pupils, may the name of the wicked rot.’ Not one word of this appears in the English text on the facing page (78a). And, even more significant, in spite of the wide circulation of this book among scholars in the English-speaking countries, not one of them has, as far as I know, protested against this glaring deception.’
The New, Improved Jewish ‘Messiah’ . . .
Today’s elitist Pharisaic ‘Jews’ believe that the mind-set of the world must be changed to think of Christianity as evil and of them as the true Elect, i.e., those who practice Pharisaism, (Babylonian Talmudism), as the ONE AND ONLY genuine Chosen People of God. Talmudic Jews call the New Testament Covenant ‘blank paper’ (Talmud, Sabbath 116a), therefore claiming that:
(1) Christianity is a 2,000 year old fraud;
(2) Talmudism/Pharisaism is the only true religion of God on the earth; and,
(3) the Talmud is the only ‘holy book’ God has ordained since the Tanakh.
In The Pharisees, his two-volume work, the renowned Rabbi Finklestein writes: ‘Pharisaism became Talmudism… but the spirit of the ancient Pharisee remains unaltered. When the Jew studies the Talmud he is actually repeating the arguments used in the Palestinian academies. From Palestine to Babylonia: from Babylonia to North Africa, Italy, Spain, France and Germany; from these to Poland, Russia and Eastern Europe generally, ancient Pharisaism has wandered.’
In Rabbi Finklestein’s history of the Jews, he states: ‘the Talmud derives its authority from the position held by the ancient (Pharisee) academies. The teachers of those academies, both of Babylonia and of Palestine, were considered the rightful successors of the older Sanhedrin. At the present time the Jewish people have no living central authority comparable in status to the ancient Sanhedrin’s or the later academies. Therefore any decision regarding the Jewish religion must be based on the Talmud as the final résumé of the teaching of those authorities when they existed.’ (The JEWS Their History, Culture and Religion, Vol 4, p 1332, Jewish Publication Society of America, 1949).
The Coming Jewish World-State . . .
‘A model ideal state will gradually spread its teachings and influence from nation to nation, …the people of Israel [Jews] will thus conquer the nations of the earth …all other peoples will be known by their detestable practices and idolatry [They call Christians idolaters] …they will be destroyed and will disappear from earth before the ushering in of the ideal era. To understand the Rabbinic conception of an ideal world it will help us if we can imagine A HAND PASSING FROM LAND TO LAND, COUNTRY TO COUNTRY, MARKING RIGHTEOUS OR WICKED ON THE FOREHEADS OF EACH ONE OF THE INHABITANTS OF THE EARTHLY GLOBE’ (The Jewish Utopia, by Rabbi Michael Higger, Ph.D.).
‘When the Messiah comes, all will be slaves of the Jews.’ (Talmud, Erubin 43b)
During the coming horrendous period when Talmudic Jews will reign unchallenged in one form or another under the auspices of their pseudo god-king, the anti-Christ, it will be they that will re-introduce beheading as an execution measure to satisfy their Talmud-sanctioned blood-lust. This method of execution for the faithful saints during this time is even mentioned in the book of Revelation:
‘…and I saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Yeshua, and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands;’ (Revelation 20:4)
The deaths of which, will be seen as doing their ‘god’ a favor according to this:
‘A Jew who kills a Christian commits no sin, but offers an acceptable sacrifice to God.’ (Talmud Abodah Zarah 26b Tosephoth)
And this too is prophesied by our Lord Yeshua (John 16:2-3):
2 They shall put you out of the synagogues: yea, the time comes, that whosoever kills you will think that he does God service.
3 And these things will they do unto you, because they have not known the Father, nor me.
What Are the ‘Noahide/Noachide Laws’? . . .
According to the Talmud, the so-called ‘Noahide’ (or ‘Noachide’) Laws were given by God to Noah when the ark came to rest on Mount Ararat. This is entirely unsubstantiated by the written Hebrew Tanakh (what Christians call the ‘Old Testament’), and should be regarded by Christians as nothing more than cunning Jewish lies designed to ultimately enslave them.
Because what they don’t tell us is that the Noahide Laws ONLY APPLY TO NON-JEWS, that Christianity is ‘idol worship’ under the Noahide Laws, and ALL non-Jews who refuse to be bound by them will be killed, probably by beheading, which is the prescribed method of execution under these laws. Is any of this prophesied in the Christian Bible? You judge . . .
‘…and I saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Yeshua, and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Messiah a thousand years.’ [Revelation 20:4]
‘…and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan.’ [Revelation 2:9]
‘Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie; behold, I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, and to know that I have loved thee.’ [Revelation 3:9]
Let us start by listing these seven major ‘Noahide’ Laws:
1. You shall not engage in idol worship.
2. You shall not blaspheme God.
3. You shall not shed innocent blood of a human nor fetus nor ailing person who has a limited time to live.
4. You shall not engage in bestial, incestuous, adulterous, or homosexual relations nor commit …rape.
5. You shall not steal.
6. You shall establish laws and courts of law to administer these laws.
7. You shall not be cruel to animals.
Sounds pretty noble, religion-neutral, and universally acceptable, doesn’t it? But the devil is in the details, the ‘details’ in this case being the definitions of ‘idol worship’, ‘blaspheme’, ‘innocent’, ‘administer’, etc.
The ‘Encyclopedia Americana’ gives its ‘explanation’ of the Noahide Laws,
‘Throughout the ages, scholars have viewed the Noahide Laws as a link between Judaism and Christianity, as universal norms of ethical conduct, as a basic concept of international law, or as a guarantee of fundamental human rights for all.’
They somehow neglect to mention that the Noahide Laws apply only to non-Jews. Moreover, this facile explanation leads one to believe that (a) all ‘scholars’ agree about the legitimacy of the ‘Noahide’ laws; and (b) that everyone on earth should agree to be bound by these seven laws. However, the truth is that the Jew who claims to live according to the ‘Torah,’ (certainly not the written Torah given to Moses, but rather the Talmud, that occultic/Kabbalistic/Pharisaic tradition adopted from the mystery religions of ancient Babylon) is not bound by the Noahide Laws. The Noahide Laws will only apply to non-Jews and are to be a direct replacement for all other civil and religious laws AND the Biblical Ten Commandments, with draconian penalties attached which far exceed anything allowed by the written Torah of Moses.
‘It is the law to kill anyone who denies the Torah. The Christians belong to the denying ones of the Torah.’ Talmud: Choszhen hamischpat 425 Hagah 425. 5
Now does that sound like their version of ‘Torah’ is the same as our Biblical Old Testament? We think not! These ‘Jews’ wish to commence with the U.S.A. to be ruled by the Noahide Laws, (which at first glance seem to be something harmless, and even moral) together with whatever is intrinsically implied in them however, as is said, ‘the devil is in the details.’
One of these ‘details’ is that there are also sixty-six other
‘Lesser-Known Noahide Laws’ which are equally deadly.
The real goal of ALL of the Noahide Laws is to have the non-Jewish population of the United States (and eventually the world) totally subject to and ruled by judicial enactments that are exclusively managed, interpreted and manipulated by ultra-orthodox Jewish rabbis, a new Sanhedrin. The penalty for violation is clearly spelled out on page 1192 of the Encyclopedia Judaica: ‘violation of any one of the seven laws subjects the Noahide to capital punishment by DECAPITATION’, even being ‘cruel’ to an animal. Rather harsh, wouldn’t you say?
So, if only one Jew steps forward to merely accuse any non-Jew of violating any one of these seven laws, that testimony alone regardless of the absence of corroborating witnesses or the otherwise proven untruth of the allegation would be enough for the sentence of death. But notice how Deuteronomy 17:6 clearly requires the testimony of 2 or 3 witnesses before one who deserves death can be executed. In fact, the last sentence of verse 6 states: ‘At the mouth of two witnesses, or three witnesses, shall he that is worthy of death be put to death; but at the mouth of one witness he shall NOT be put to death.’ So much for the COMMANDMENT of YHVH Elohim!
‘Every Jew, who spills the blood of the godless, (non-Jews) is doing the same as making a sacrifice to God.’ (Talmud: Bammidber raba c 21 & Jalkut 772)
Their dead bodies will be exhibited as public warnings to all others who would resist their power. The Lord’s Supper will be transformed from wine, the symbolic blood of Yeshua, to the real blood of true believers, that will be soon freely shed under this new, Satanic theocracy!
Always remember as Biblical fact, that the Pharisaic Jewish establishment succeeded in the illegal trial and subsequent killing of Yeshua Messiah on the primary basis that he blasphemed God (Matthew 26:65), which is Noahide Law number 2 ‘Thou shalt not blaspheme God.’
‘Extermination of a Christian is a necessary sacrifice to God.’ Talmud Zohar (II, 43a)
Make no mistake, these remarkable and sickening quotes from the Talmud (Soncino Edition) here and elsewhere, are quite genuine and gleaned from a large variety of reliable sources, mostly Jewish. These are but a few of the hundreds of similar Talmudic passages that deal with the required treatment of Christians. THIS is the reality of the Jewish Talmudic ‘legacy,’ and there is much more to come.
‘The Jewish people as a whole will be its own Messiah.’ It will attain world dominion by the dissolution of other races, by the abolition of frontiers, the annihilation of monarchy, and by the establishment of a world republic in which the Jews will everywhere exercise the privilege of citizenship. In this New World Order the Children of Israel will furnish all the leaders without encountering opposition. The Governments of the different peoples forming the world republic will fall without difficulty into the hands of the Jews. It will then be possible for the Jewish rulers to abolish private property, and everywhere to make use of the resources of the state. Thus will the promise of the Talmud be fulfilled, in which is said that when the Messianic time is come the Jews will have all the property of the whole world in their hands.’
[Baruch Levy, Letter to Karl Marx, La Revue de Paris, p. 54, June 1, 1928]
Bear in mind that the above is not taken from the ‘Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion’, a work which has been vehemently denied by virtually all rabbinic Jews as an imposture. This is an authenticated verbatim quotation from one of the early recognized leaders of international Zionism! What does it mean that it is actually a condensed version of the absolutely identical aims and methods as put forward in the ‘Protocols’? Who is kidding whom?
Please note that these so-called ‘Noahide Laws’ appear NOWHERE in the written Tanakh, the
Old Testament of the Christian Bible, but have been INVENTED by the Pharisaic authors of the Babylonian Talmud, the Kabbalah, a.k.a. ‘Mystery Babylon’, as a bogus theological assertion to try to legitimize their bloodthirsty lust for power. Have they succeeded? You be the judge.
The following is an edict by President Ronald Reagan:
Public Papers of the Presidents April 4, 1985
CITE: 1985 Pub. Papers LENGTH: 365 words
HEADLINE: Education Day, U.S.A., 1985 HIGHLIGHT: Proclamation 5317.
BODY: By the President of the United States of America
A proclamation [emphasis added]
In order to achieve its highest goals, education must be more than just a training in facts and figures, or even in basic skills, as important as they are. It must also include instruction in the deepest ethical values of our civilization.
Very few Americans have done more to promote these ethical values as the basis of civilization than Rabbi Mendel Schneerson, the leader of the worldwide Lubavitch movement. The word ‘Lubavitch’ comes from the name of a Russian city and means city of love. That is very appropriate because, of all the ethical values which inform our civilization, none is more important than love of wisdom, love of our fellowman, and love of our Creator.
These are the values which Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson exemplifies. And they are the values, with their roots in the Seven Noahide Laws, which have guided the Lubavitch movement throughout its history. They are the essence of education at its best, and we should be certain that we pass on this precious heritage to all young Americans.
In recognition of Rabbi Schneerson’s contributions and in honor of his 83rd birthday, which falls this year on April 2, the Congress, by House Joint Resolution 186, has designated April 2, 1985, as ‘Education Day, U.S.A.’ and authorized and requested the President to issue an appropriate proclamation in observance of this event.
Now, Therefore, I, Ronald Reagan, President of the United States of America, do hereby proclaim Tuesday, April 2, 1985, as Education Day, U.S.A., and I call upon the people of the United States, and in particular our teachers and other educational leaders, to observe that day with appropriate ceremonies and activities.
In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand this fourth day of April, in the year of our Lord nineteen hundred and eighty-five, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and ninth.
(signed) Ronald Reagan [Filed with the Office of the Federal Register, 11:48 a.m., April 5, 1985]
And this . . .
The Congress of the United States of America has declared that the seven universal laws commanded to Noah (the Noahide laws) are ‘the bedrock of society from the dawn of civilization.’ U.S. Congress, H.J. Resolution 104, Public Law 102-14, 1991.
Believe it or not, boys and girls, this effectively establishes the Noahide Laws as the primary basis for all International Law, (read ‘New World Order’) to which all American law MUST eventually conform. This unique public law remarkably singles out one particular Jewish group for special honor, saying that they best embody the principles of these Noahide Laws. This group is the previously mentioned Chabad Lubavitcher Movement, of the rabidly anti-Gentile Chabad Hasidic Jews.
The following is a blueprint for the establishment of the Noahide Laws in the formerly Palistinian-occupied areas of ‘Israel’. It is quoted from Al Gore Letter #10, 01-Nov-2000 Education Day USA (since removed from the internet, for obvious reasons):
‘Upon seizing the reins of government, the new Noahide leaders will move quickly to implement a full agenda of reform. … Full support will be given to Israeli forces to reinvade PLO-controlled areas, with military assistance offered where necessary. Jewish courts will be granted full legal sovereignty over Jewish citizens within each country, who will no longer be subject to the authority of gentile courts. The pre-existing Noahide judges and courts will replace the existing court system of each country, and the legal code will be drastically rewritten to conform to halacha…. …. And law and order will be fully restored through the establishment of internal security measures, again in accordance with Torah law.’
So, apparently seeking ANY kind of a power base in a storm, algore the goyische goldfish, has ignorantly thrown in with the Lubavitcher piranha. And the beat goes on.
But at least some Jewish scholars have come to somewhat different, and less flattering, conclusions concerning the Lubavitchers and their ‘Messiah’ wanna-be. Israel Shahak, a Jew, in his book, Jewish History, Jewish Religion: The Weight of Three Thousand Years, states that:
‘My final, more general example is, if possible, even more shocking than the others. It concerns the attitude of the Hassidic movement toward non-Jews. Hassidism a continuation (and debasement!) of Jewish mysticism is still a living movement, with hundreds of thousands of active adherents who are fanatically devoted to their ‘holy rabbis,’ some of whom have acquired a very considerable political influence in Israel, among the leaders of most parties and even more so in the higher echelons of the army.
‘What, then, are the views of this movement concerning non-Jews? As an example, let us take the famous Hatanya, fundamental book of the Habbad movement, one of the most important branches of Hassidism. According to this book, all non-Jews are totally satanic creatures ‘in whom there is absolutely nothing good.’
‘Even a non-Jewish embryo is qualitatively different from a Jewish one. The very existence of a non-Jew is ‘inessential’, whereas all of creation was created solely for the sake of the Jews.’
‘This book is circulated in countless editions, and its ideas are further propagated in the numerous ‘discourses’ of the rabbi, M. M. Schneurssohn (Schneerson), who leads this powerful world-wide organisation from his New York headquarters.
‘In Israel these ideas are widely disseminated among the public at large, in the schools and in the army. (According to the testimony of Shulamit Aloni, Member of the Knesset, this Habbad propaganda was particularly stepped up before Israel’s invasion of Lebanon in March 1978, in order to induce military doctors and nurses to withhold medical help from ‘Gentile wounded.’ This Nazi-like advice did not refer specifically to Arabs or Palestinians, but simply to ‘Gentiles,’ goyim.)
‘A former Israeli President, Shazar, was an ardent adherent of Habbad, and many top Israeli and American politicians headed by Prime Minister Begin publicly courted and supported it. This, in spite of the considerable unpopularity of the Lubavitcher rabbi in Israel he was widely criticised because he refuses to come to the Holy Land even for a visit and keeps himself in New York for obscure messianic reasons, while in New York his anti-Black attitude is notorious.
‘The fact that, despite these pragmatic difficulties, Habbad can be publicly supported by so many top political figures owes much to the thoroughly disingenuous and misleading treatment by almost all scholars who have written about the Hassidic movement and its Habbad branch. This applies particularly to all who have written or are writing about it in English. They suppress the glaring evidence of the old Hassidic texts as well as the latter-day political implications that follow from them, which stare in the face of even a casual reader of the Israeli Hebrew press, in whose pages the Lubavitcher rabbi and other Hassidic leaders constantly publish the most rabid bloodthirsty statements and exhortations against all Arabs.
‘A chief deceiver in this case, and a good example of the power of deception, was Martin Buber. His numerous works eulogising the whole Hassidic movement (including Habbad) never so much as hint at the real doctrines of Hassidism concerning non-Jews. The crime of deception is all the greater in view of the fact that Buber’s eulogies of Hassidism were first published in German during the period of the rise of German nationalism and the accession of Nazism to power.
‘But while ostensibly opposing Nazism, Buber glorified a movement holding and actually teaching doctrines about non-Jews not unlike the Nazi doctrines about Jews. One could of course argue that the Hassidic Jews of seventy or fifty years ago were the victims, and a ‘white lie’ favouring a victim is excusable. But the consequences of deception are incalculable. Buber’s works were translated into Hebrew, were made a powerful element of the Hebrew education in Israel, have greatly increased the power of the blood-thirsty Hassidic leaders, and have thus been an important factor in the rise of Israeli chauvinism and hatred of all non-Jews. If we think of the many human beings who died of their wounds because Israeli army nurses, incited by Hassidic propaganda, refused to tend them, then a heavy onus for their blood lies on the head of Martin Buber.’
Quoted verbatim from Israel Shahak, Jewish History, Jewish Religion: The Weight of Three Thousand Years, Pluto Press, London and Boulder Colorado, 1994, pp. 26-28.
The Real Goals of the Lubavitchers . . .
Here, exposed from behind the carefully contrived façade of phony moral statutes and deliberately misleading phrases, are the real goals of the Noahide Laws:
1. The elimination of the entire written Hebrew Tanakh and the total rejection of the Renewed Covenant Scriptures (‘New Testament’);
2. The rejection of the atonement of HaMashiach upon the execution stake;
3. The rejection of the Plan/Logos of YHVH Elohim for the salvation of mankind;
4. The spying on one another to supply the one eyewitness needed to trigger the death penalty (contrary to Deuteronomy 17:6);
5. The necessity of keeping the other 66 ‘lesser known Noahide laws’;
6. Circumcision of all males;
7. Eating only rabbinically-approved kosher foods;
8. Forbidding the holding of religious services of any type in a place that is not an approved assembly place for Noahides;
9. The death penalty for anyone (Christians being the main target) who claims that God has spoken through them by way of teaching, preaching or writing, that is in any way contradictory to the establishment ‘worship system.’
‘The Christians are always singing about the blood. Let us give them enough of it! Let us cut their throats and drag them over the altar! And let them drown in their own blood! I dream of the day when the last priest is strangled on the guts of the last preacher.’ (Chairman of the American Communist Party, Gus Hall, a Jew)
It will be a serious crime to claim to be a Prophet, Preacher, or Pastor, to whom the Antichrist authorities have not issued a certificate of approval, and it will be a death penalty offence to oppose in any way the new ‘religion’. ‘Opposition’ means to merely speak against any Jewish priest, any Jewish rabbi, any Noahide minister, any Noahide or Jewish temple or place of worship, or oppose any doctrine that the ‘Rebbe Adepts’ teach or advocate. So, under the guise of Pharisaic Judaism, the modern Kabbalists are cunningly taking us all back to Babylon, and to the ancient house of pagan bondage from which they slithered.
How then, could any Torah-true talmid (disciple) of Yeshua of Nazareth ever support the diabolical plotting behind the precepts of the Noahide laws, to aid in the destruction of the Renewed Covenant Scriptures (‘New Testament’), and of the Church, and be complicit in the killing of the precious and faithful Saints of God? Yet this is exactly what the reconstruction of the Temple will surely lead to!
Antichrists are even now arising from all Protestant denominations, who deny that salvation is through Yeshua Messiah alone. The Roman Catholic ‘pope’ has said as much, and leaders of certain Anglican, Episcopal, Presbyterian, and other ‘mainline Protestant’ denominations have said as much. This is that spirit of Anti-Christ which will join forces with Jewish rabbis together with other ‘Jewish-Gentile’ groups to complete their total assault on evangelical Christianity.
‘All Jews are good by nature, all non-Jews are evil by nature. The Jews are creation’s crowning glory, the non-Jews are the scum of the earth.’
This quote is typical of the Talmudic-Jewish philosophy that saturates the thinking of Jews such as Rabbi Shneur Zalman, one of the leading ‘Halacha’ scholars in Jewish history according to the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, March 11, 1994, p. 14.
From Their Own Lips . . .
The following is included, not from any desire to inflame Christians, but so that Christians may
see for themselves what many Jews believe about themselves and about Christ, Christianity, and Christians. The following is taken verbatim from a prominent ‘Lubavitcher’ website, the ‘Noah’s Covenant Web Site’,…
[NOTE: Bible verses quoted below have been inserted for the reader’s understanding.
They are NOT included in the Chabad Lubavitcher website text.
Also, the web address above, ending in YESHU, is not ‘a Jewish way of spelling Yeshua.’ It is an ACRONYM in Hebrew (Yemach shemo vezichro), used to refer to Yeshua, standing for ‘May his name and memory be blotted out’. Ed.]

************************ Start of the Chabad Lubavitcher website **************************
Who Was Jesus?
The Bible gave a warning about a dangerous, false prophet who would arise to test our faith in G-d. In Deuteronomy 13, [Note: The following obviously is a warning against GENERIC behavior, NOT against a SPECIFIC person. Ed.]
13:1 IF there arise among you a prophet, or a dreamer of dreams, and giveth thee a sign or a wonder,
2 And the sign or the wonder come to pass, whereof he spake unto thee, saying, Let us go after other gods, which thou hast not known, and let us serve them; [Yeshua never preached any God but the unitary, monotheistic YHVH Elohim of the Hebrew Tanakh, and they know it!]
3 Thou shalt not hearken unto the words of that prophet, or that dreamer of dreams: for the LORD your God proveth you, to know whether ye love the LORD your God with all your heart and with all your soul.
4 Ye shall walk after the LORD your God, and fear him, and keep his commandments, and obey his voice, and ye shall serve him, and cleave unto him.
5 And that prophet, or that dreamer of dreams, shall be put to death; because he hath spoken to turn you away from the LORD your God, which brought you out of the land of Egypt, and
redeemed you out of the house of bondage, to thrust thee out of the way which the LORD thy God commanded thee to walk in. So shalt thou put the evil away from the midst of thee.
6 If thy brother, the son of thy mother, or thy son, or thy daughter, or the wife of thy bosom, or thy friend, which is as thine own soul, entice thee secretly, saying, Let us go and serve other gods, which thou hast not known, thou, nor thy fathers;
7 Namely, of the gods of the people which are round about you, nigh unto thee, or far off from thee, from the one end of the earth even unto the other end of the earth;
8 Thou shalt not consent unto him, nor hearken unto him; neither shall thine eye pity him, neither shalt thou spare, neither shalt thou conceal him:
9 But thou shalt surely kill him; thine hand shall be first upon him to put him to death, and afterwards the hand of all the people.
10 And thou shalt stone him with stones, that he die; because he hath sought to thrust thee away from the LORD thy God, which brought thee out of the land of Egypt, from the house of bondage.
11 And all Israel shall hear, and fear, and shall do no more any such wickedness as this is among you.
G-d describes this [Emphasis added. Ed.] false prophet as a member of the Jewish people (v. 2, 7) who would tell true prophecies and would have the power of miracles. G-d Himself would give this false prophet the power to perform miracles and reveal prophecy, but the false prophet would try to seduce the people away from G-d’s Law and towards strange gods unknown to Judaism. The purpose would be to test whether we are truly committed to living under the Law [by which they mean their oral Torah/Talmud, which violates the written Torah of YHVH in myriad ways!], or whether we will be dazzled and fall for the temptation to join a false path to salvation (v. 3-6, 7-8, 11). In this Biblical passage, G-d repeatedly commands the Jews to kill this false prophet, lest the evil spread and destroy many souls.
To be accepted by the people, the false prophet would sometimes pretend to be a righteous Jew who fulfills the Law, but at key moments he would turn against certain details of the Law in order to make the breach (v. 6, 7). This is the reason that verse 1 commands us not to add or subtract any details from the Law, and verse 5 warns us to remain steadfast with all the traditions of the Law. [[It says NO SUCH THING, and YHVH Elohim EXPLICITLY CONDEMNS the teaching of ‘the commandments of men, taught as doctrine.’ (Isaiah 29:13)]]
In Deuteronomy 17, this false prophet is also described as someone who would rebel against the authority of the judges of the Jewish people, and who should be put to death for his rebelliousness (v. 8-13, esp. v. 12). Who are the judges? The highest court in Israel was the Sanhedrin, which was established by Moses (Exodus 18:13-26; Numbers 11:16-29), and which lasted more than 15 centuries. [[Neither Moses nor ‘the judges’ were ANYWHERE AUTHORIZED TO CHANGE THE WRITTEN TORAH. Yet they did, and do!]] The members of the Sanhedrin were the rabbis known as ‘Pharisees’ (Pirushim, ‘those with the explanation’). G-d gave permanent authority to these judges to interpret the Law and G?d’s Word, [Moses gave them the authority to INTERPRET, not CHANGE, TORAH.- Ed.] and it is a commandment to follow their decisions without turning even slightly to the right or the left (Deut. 17:11). [[Another BFL. The command is to obey the WRITTEN TORAH, not ‘the commandments of men, taught as doctrine. (Isaiah 29:13) -Ed.]] But the false prophet would challenge the authority of the Sanhedrin, thus revealing himself to be an evil man.
[The authors thereby call Yeshua haMashiach ‘an evil man’ and thus bear false witness against the holy Spirit, which is sacrilege, blasphemy, and ‘the unforgivable sin’. Ed.]
In the book of the prophet Daniel, this false prophet is described as a king (the eleventh horn on a terrible beast) who would wage war against the Jews (the ‘holy ones’; see Deut. 14:2 on this term) and would change the Law including the calendar and the holidays (Daniel 7:8, 20-25).
[So here they call Christ the anti-Christ, totally ignoring the sequence of end-times events described in Daniel, Ezekiel, Jeremiah, Isaiah, Joel, etc.! Again, bearing false witness against the holy Spirit of YHVH Elohim, Ruach haKodesh! Ed.]
Elsewhere, this false prophet is described as a king who would disregard the G-d of his fathers, exalting himself as a god and giving honor to this new god-head (Daniel 11:36-39).
The man known today as ‘Yeshua’ fulfilled all these prophecies. He became a ‘king’ (over the Christian church) who changed the original Law, doing away with the Hebrew calendar and the Biblical holidays (Rosh Hashanah, Yom Kippur, Sukkos the Festival of Tabernacles, Passover, etc.). He disregarded the one, infinite G-d of the Hebrew Bible in favor of a new ‘trinity’ [ No, pagan ‘Christianity’ did that. Yeshua NEVER claimed to BE God! John 17:3- Ed.] that included himself. And he repeatedly broke the Law by committing terrible sins, while openly challenging the G-d-given authority of the rabbis of the Sanhedrin.
[Yet no one could be found to testify against him at his ‘trial’, and he was killed by the Romans with the cooperation of the Sanhedrin, in direct violation of the written Torah of Moses. Ed.]
Naturally, Yeshua did sometimes pretend to respect the Law, but whenever he thought he could get away with it, he turned right around and broke that same Law. In Matthew 5:17-19, he declared that he came to fulfill the Law, and in Matthew 23:1-3 he defended the authority of the rabbis. [Due to a MIStranslation by the Bible translators!-Ed.] But the rest of the time, he rebelled against the Law thus showing that his occasional words of piety were meant only to hide his evil agenda. The following sins of Yeshua are recorded in the ‘New Testament’:
1) Yeshua repudiated the laws of kosher food (Mark 7:18-19). [Compare this to the prophet Daniel’s strict adherence to kashrus, in Daniel chapter 1.] [[These are RABBINIC laws, NOT Torah!]]
2) He repudiated the laws of honoring one’s parents, and called on his followers to hate their parents; he also dishonored his own mother (Matthew 10:34-36; Matthew 12:46-50; Luke 14:26).
3) He violated the Sabbath by picking grain, and incited his disciples to do the same (Matthew 12:1-8; Mark 2:23-26). [No, he violated the rabbinic prohibitions, NOT the Torah! Ed.]
4) He again violated the Sabbath by healing a man’s arm, which was not a matter of saving a life, and he openly defied the rabbis in his total repudiation of the Sabbath (Matthew 12:9-13; Mark 3:1-5 [Compare this to G-d’s view of violating the Sabbath, in Numbers 15:32-36, Nehemiah 10:30-32, and dozens of other places throughout the Bible.]
[BFL. No, he violated the rabbinic prohibitions, NOT the written Torah of Moses! Please note that they totally ignore the FACT that Yeshua COULD heal a man’s withered arm ! They do not even try to deny his powers ! Ed.]
5) Yeshua brazenly defied and disobeyed the rabbis of the Sanhedrin, repudiating their authority (This is recorded in many places throughout the New Testament, but look especially at Matthew 23:13-39 and John 8:44-45). [[AMEN! He identified them as ‘the synagogue of Satan’!-Ed.]]
The Talmud (Babylonian edition) records other sins of ‘Yeshua the Nazarene’:
1) He and his disciples practiced sorcery and black magic, led Jews astray into idolatry, and were sponsored by foreign, gentile powers for the purpose of subverting Jewish worship (Sanhedrin 43a). [[BFL. ZERO evidence from history to corroborate this charge.-Ed.]]
2) He was sexually immoral, worshipped statues of stone (a brick is mentioned), was cut off from the Jewish people for his wickedness, and refused to repent (Sanhedrin 107b; Sotah 47a). [[BFL. ZERO evidence from history to corroborate this charge.-Ed.]]
3) He learned witchcraft in Egypt and, to perform miracles, used procedures that involved cutting his flesh which is also explicitly banned in the Bible (Shabbos 104b). [[BFL. ZERO evidence from history to corroborate this charge.-Ed.]]
The false, rebellious message of Yeshua has been thoroughly rejected by the vast majority of the Jewish people, as G-d commanded. Unfortunately, however, this same message has brought a terrible darkness upon the world; today, over 1.5 billion gentiles believe in Yeshua. These lost souls mistakenly think they have found salvation in Yeshua; tragically, they are in for a rude awakening. Truth and eternal life are found directly from G-d, through performing His Law. Any ‘mediator’ only separates man from G-d:
1) ‘G-d is not a man, who can lie, nor the son of man, who relents. He has not beheld iniquity in Jacob, nor has He seen perverseness in Israel’ (Numbers 23:19). [This refers to the person of Israel, and surely not to the ‘children of Israel’, who are damned by YHVH Elohim for their violation of His covenant, for their stubborn rebelliousness, their myriad ‘whoredoms’ (worship of false Babylonian & Canaanite deities which continues to today witness the names of these false ‘gods’ which they have chosen for the names of the months of their calendar, Tammuz, etc., described by YHVH as ‘an abomination’. (Ezekiel 8:12-14)]
2) Speaking prophetically of the Christian church, Moses declared, ‘For their ‘rock’ is not like our Rock. Where is their god, in whom they trusted?’ (Deut. 32:31, 37). [BFL. These verses actually refer to the children of ISRAEL themselves, ‘Jeshurun’, how they will corrupt themselves, AFTER they enter the Promised Land. As in the ‘Jews’ in ‘Israel’ TODAY! (Isaiah 28:14) -Ed.]]
3) ‘‘See now that I, only I, am He, and there is no god with Me. I kill, and I bring to life; I wound, and I heal, and there is none who can rescue from My Hand.’ Sing songs of joy, gentiles, with His people, for He will avenge the blood of His servants, and will take vengeance on His enemies, and will forgive His land and His people’ (Deut. 32:39, 43).
4) ‘I, only I am HaShem [Literally, ‘the Name’, a typically sanctimonious Pharisaic reference to YHWH Ed.], and besides Me there is no savior’ (Isaiah 43:11).
5) ‘I am the First and I am the Last; besides me there is no god. Is there a god besides Me? There is no rock; I do not know any’ (Isaiah 44:6).
6) ‘Israel is saved in Hashem with an eternal salvation. Assemble yourselves and come, come near together, you gentiles who have escaped [the judgment]. (They have no knowledge, those who carry wooden sculptures and who pray to a god that does not save.) Announce and bring near, even take counsel together: Who declared this from ancient times, and announced it from then? Is it not I, Hashem? And there are no other gods beside Me, nor any righteous and saving god other than Me. Turn to Me and be saved, all ends of the earth, for I am G-d and there is none else. By Myself I swore, a righteous word went out of my mouth and it will not be withdrawn, that to Me every knee will bow and every tongue will swear’ (Isaiah 45:17, 20-23).
What is the true key to salvation? Those who return to the Law (the Seven Commandments for
the Children of Noah, according to the eternal covenant made with Noah in Genesis 9) and who assist the Jewish people (Isaiah 60, 61, 66) will be saved and will participate in the miracles and revelations, including worshipping in the Third Temple, under the kingship of the Messiah. [To many of these BOGUS bloodthirsty monsters, Jews ARE ‘the Messiah’, as is borne out in many of their other writings and teachings. Ed.] As described in many places, including Jeremiah 16:19-21 and Zechariah 8:20-23, all the old gentile religions of the world will disappear, and their followers will turn to the Jews for spiritual leadership. Until then, Christians are spiritually blinded, and cannot yet understand G-d’s wisdom in the Bible.
Ours is the last generation of the era of sin and evil and the first of the Messianic Era. Indeed, for the first time in history, there is a growing consensus of leading rabbis willing to name the man most suited to be the Messiah, and they are agreeing that he is the Lubavitcher Rebbe, Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson.
[So, this is how the identity of ‘the Messiah’ is going to be determined? It is an elective office? And only Jewish rabbis get to vote? Please, show us that in the Torah, or even in your diabolical Talmud. Oops! Sorry, boys. Your ‘messiah’ died. And, at last peek, was still rotting. Ed.]
The Rebbe is the spiritual leader of our generation, having boldly stirred up controversy over vital issues in which other leaders have remained tragically silent or have even caved in to the growing forces of darkness. He has upheld the Law perfectly [[Really? And which ‘Law’ was that? Surely NOT the written Torah of Moses, was it? Since, by your own admission, with your takanot and ma-asim, ‘the commandments of MEN, taught as doctrine’ (Isaiah 29:13), you have given yourselves the ‘authority’ to break the WRITTEN Torah of YHVH Elohim whenever you wish! And so with ‘the Rebbe’!- Ed.]] and has worked mightily to strengthen the observance of the Law by Jews, as well as the observance of the Noahide Law by gentiles. Through his teaching of chasidus (Jewish mystical teachings, preserved from Moses and Mount Sinai [[BFL. ZERO evidence from history to corroborate this charge.-Ed.]], he has taught the world that G-d is One, the Infinite Who renews creation at every moment. The Rebbe is a direct descendant of King David [NOT if he’s an Ashkenazim from Eastern Europe, he’s not! But they know that this cannot be explicitly DISproven, since the genealogical records were destroyed along with the Second Temple by the Roman General Titus in 68 A.D. Ed.] and has received a true prophecy from G-d that we who are alive in this generation shall be the first in history to see the coming of the true messiah. Many Jews are eagerly anticipating the Rebbe’s resurrection from the grave, ready to re-establish the Sanhedrin and anoint the king.
Our job is to finish preparing the way, by announcing the truth [[ They should choke when they print or say this!- Ed.]] and bringing all of mankind back to the Law immediately. Through our divinely mandated efforts, we shall now clear the path for the return of the Garden of Eden and the establishment of the eternal sinless world promised by Isaiah and the other Biblical prophets.
**** End of Noah’s Covenant ‘Manifesto’ ****
This information is included so that Christians who have no (or limited) prior exposure to the actual teachings of the Chabad Lubavitchers (there’s likely a Chabad synagogue near you!) and other similar racist, hate-based Jewish organizations, might come to understand just how real they are, how serious they are, and how much of a danger they constitute to those of us who intend to survive the imminent reign of the fake Jews’ AntiChrist, called the Great Tribulation.
The Talmud Satanic Hatred of Christians Codified . . .
Dr. Israel Shahak, in his work, Jewish History, Jewish Religion and Bernard Pick in Yeshua in the Talmud, (pp. 57; 105-106), have both confirmed the overt hatred and racism contained in the Talmud. Anyone who denies these deplorable characteristics of the Talmud, the Jews’ ‘holiest’
book, is a liar. Neither the modern popes nor the modern heads of evangelical Protestantism, have ever dared insist that the rabbis of Judaism repudiate or condemn the racism in the Talmud or the murderous hatred for Christ and Christians expressed within it . . ‘for fear of the Jews.’
On the contrary, the blind guides of ‘Churchianity’ have urged their ‘sheeple’ to love, honor and even to obey such evil, degenerate, blasphemous followers of the Godless, pagan Talmud as the
Chabad Lubavitcher, ‘The Rebbe’ Schneerson. Therefore, it should be quite evident that such leaders of Christendom are by default, among the worst betrayers of Yeshua Messiah on earth.
The Synagogue of Satan . . .
As previously mentioned, in the Book of the Revelation, the Lord Yeshua refers to some who call themselves Jews (Greek ioudaios/ioudaios, ‘Judeans’) but who are not such according to the Father or him, and it is apparent that this is not a good thing for them nor for the Church:
8 And unto the angel of the church in Smyrna write; These things says the First and the Last, which was dead, and is alive;
9 I know your works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but you are rich) and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan. [Revelation 2:9]
And again:
7 And to the angel of the church in Philadelphia write; These things says He that is holy, He that is true, He that has the key of David, He that opens, and no man shuts; and shuts, and no man opens;
8 I know your works: behold, I have set before you an open door, and no man can shut it: for you have a little strength, and have kept my word, and have not denied my name.
9 Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie; behold, I will make them to come and worship before your feet, and to know that I have loved you. [Revelation 3:9]
It remains to be seen to whom this refers. Let us recall some of our Lord’s descriptions of the Pharisees of His day:
1 Then came to Yeshua scribes and Pharisees, which were of Jerusalem, saying,
2 Why do your disciples transgress the tradition of the elders? for they wash not their hands when they eat bread.
3 But he answered and said unto them, Why do you also transgress the commandment of God by your traditions?
4 For God commanded, saying, Honor your father and mother: and, He that curses father or mother, let him die the death.
5 But you say, Whosoever shall say to his father or his mother, ‘It is corban’ (dedicated to the Temple), concerning whatsoever of mine you might have been profited;
6 And honor not his father or his mother, he shall be free. Thus have you made the commandment of God of no effect by your traditions.
7 You hypocrites, well did Isaiah prophesy of you (Isaiah 29:13), saying,
8 ‘This people draws near to Me with their mouth, and honors Me with their lips; but their heart is far from Me.
9 But in vain they do worship Me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men.’ [Matthew 15:1-9]
And this:
1 Then spoke Yeshua to the multitude, and to his disciples,
2 Saying, The scribes and the Pharisees sit in Moses’ seat:
3 All therefore whatsoever HE (Moses!) bids you observe, that observe and do; but do not you after THEIR works: for they say, and do not. [According to the Shem Tov Hebrew Gospel of Matthew!]
4 For they bind heavy burdens and grievous to be borne, and lay them on men’s shoulders; but they themselves will not move them with one of their fingers.
5 But all their works they do to be seen of men: they make broad their phylacteries, and enlarge the borders of their garments,
6 And love the uppermost rooms at feasts, and the chief seats in the synagogues,
7 And greetings in the markets, and to be called of men, Rabbi, Rabbi.
8 But do not be called Rabbi: for one is your Master, even Christ; and all you are brethren.
9 And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven.
10 Neither be called masters: for one is your Master, even Christ.
11 But he that is greatest among you shall be your servant.
12 And whosoever shall exalt himself shall be abased; and he that shall humble himself shall be exalted.
13 But woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for you shut up the kingdom of heaven against men: for you neither go in yourselves, neither do you allow them that would enter to go in.
14 Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for you devour widows’ houses, and for a pretence make long prayer: therefore you shall receive the greater damnation.
15 Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for you search sea and land to make one convert, and when he is made, you make him twofold more the child of hell than yourselves.
16 Woe unto you, you blind guides, which say, ‘Whosoever shall swear by the temple, it is nothing; but whosoever shall swear by the gold of the temple, he is bound!’
17 You fools and blind: for whether is greater, the gold, or the temple that sanctifies the gold?
18 And, ‘Whosoever shall swear by the altar, it is nothing; but whosoever swears by the gift that is upon it, he is bound.’
19 You fools and blind: for whether is greater, the gift, or the altar that sanctifies the gift?
20 Whoso therefore shall swear by the altar, swears by it, and by all things thereon.
21 And whoso shall swear by the temple, swears by it, and by him that dwells therein.
22 And he that shall swear by heaven, swears by the throne of God, and by him that sits thereon.
23 Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for you pay tithe of mint and anise and cumin, and have omitted the weightier matters of the law, judgment, mercy, and faith: these you ough

{ Comments are closed }

The Revisionists’ Total Victory on the Historical and Scientific Level By Robert Faurisson

TotalVictory copy

‘The rising flood, particularly on the Internet, that is bringing to the world’s knowledge the spectacular achievements of historical revisionism is not suddenly going to halt its advance or return towards its source.”
~ Robert Faurisson
In France and in the rest of the world historians and specialists of ‘the Holocaust” no longer know what to answer to the revisionists’ arguments. And to speak only of my own case, which has been going on since 1978 (that is, for some thirty-seven years), never has my country’s justice system, despite the tireless requests by self-righteous associations to rule against me on the substance of my writings or statements, been able to note therein the least trace of any rashness, negligence, deliberate ignorance, falsehood, falsification or lying. My adversaries, rich and powerful though they may be, have never succeeded in getting our judges to convict me on the merits of the conclusions reached through my research work which, for over half a century, has focused on what is commonly called ‘the genocide of the Jews”, ‘the Nazi gas chambers” and ‘the six million (or nearly)” Jewish victims of the Third Reich. At most, at the end countless cases I have lost suits (whether as plaintiff or defendant) or been found guilty mainly 1) for a malevolence, supposed but not demonstrated, towards the Jews, 2) for breaking the gayssotine (the Fabius-Gayssot or Faurisson Act, legislation of convenience specifically targeting the findings of my research) or 3) by virtue of the ‘good faith” (sic) of individuals like Léon Poliakov or Robert Badinter, even though found to be at fault by the judges themselves.
For years Poliakov had well and truly manipulated the writings of SS officer Kurt Gerstein (who, having ‘repented” (?), then committed suicide (?)), when not fabricating outright fragments of text to attribute to him. But the judges granted the presumption of good faith to Poliakov. He had been, we were told, ‘animated by the passionate and legitimate desire to inform the public about a period and about facts of contemporary history that were particularly tragic”. It was therefore appropriate to forgive him for having ‘perhaps, on minor points [sic!!!], broken scientific standards of rigour without, however, it being permissible to state that he is a manipulator or fabricator of texts”. As for Badinter, in 2006 he claimed that in 1981, when he was still barrister for the LICRA and just before becoming Minister of Justice, he had got a court to rule against me ‘for being a falsifier of history”. A decision of 2007 restored the truth and held that Badinter had ‘failed in his evidence” to demonstrate my alleged dishonesty; but, the court hastened to add, he had been in good faith. For want of both money and a lawyer (Eric Delcroix having retired not without being refused honorary membership of the bar), I did not appeal and was forced to pay the Socialist millionaire the sum of €5,000. But at least since then I have had the satisfaction of being able to speak of ‘Robert Badinter, my liar, my slanderer… in good faith”.
An astute observer will have noted that the more our opponents sense the game is getting away from them on the historical or scientific level, the more they feel the need to increase their propagandistic drum beating, and the repression as well. In France, at this very moment, they are putting all their hopes in having Parliament pass a supergayssotine. Good for them! A few weeks short of my 87th birthday, I have six cases pending, four against me and two others that I have had to instigate, albeit quite unwillingly. Will my judges finally decide, in 2016, to leave us, my wife and me, destitute? Or are they getting ready simply to throw me into a prison of the République? It is understood beforehand, is it not?, that if they were to carry things to such extremes it would only be on the grounds of the noblest républicain principles and in the name of human rights.
Let’s consider our current Prime Minister. One day, Manuel Valls, in full pomposity, his mouth, heart and left hand clenched, let fly: ‘I am, by my wife, eternally linked to the Jewish community and Israel”. He saw himself as ‘eternal”: a vast programme! But fervour was leading him astray. He ought to come back down to earth, reconnect with the ground, get treatment and stop deluding himself: the revisionists have, already as of now, won the match.
As early as in 1983-1985, Raul Hilberg, surrendering to the arguments of ‘Faurisson and others…” had to drop the pretension of explaining, on the basis of valid arguments and documents of his own, that the Third Reich had, with proper Germanic efficiency, designed, prepared, developed, organised and financed the killing of millions of European Jews. The eminent Jewish American historian ended up finding himself reduced to trying to have us believe that this gigantic massacre had come about by the operation of the Holy Spirit or, in his words, by ‘an incredible meeting of minds, a consensus-mind reading within a large bureaucracy” that had, on its own, spontaneously decided, it seemed, gradually to abandon written communication in favour of verbal or indeed telepathic exchange to such an extent that no written or material evidence bespoke the six million Jews’ (or, in Hilberg’s case, a bit fewer) had been systematically killed either on the Eastern Front or in the gas chambers, mainly at Auschwitz.
Screen Shot 2016-01-14 at 11.16.23 AM
A number of historians or researchers, such as Arno Mayer, Jean-Claude Pressac and Robert Jan van Pelt, have also capitulated, in a more frank and direct manner. The first has had to admit, among other bitter observations, that ‘Sources for the study of the gas chambers are at once rare and unreliable”. The second, a protégé of the Klarsfeld couple, came to understand that the dossier of the official story of the Jews’ extermination, ‘rotten” with too many lies, was bound for ‘the rubbish bins of history”. The third has concluded that ‘Ninety-nine per cent of what we know [about Auschwitz] we do not actually have the physical evidence to prove”; despite this, millions of visitors there have been and continue to be shown a ‘gas chamber” said to be in its ‘original state”, as well as ruins of other alleged ‘gas chambers”. As for the figure of ‘six million”, never subjected to the least scientific verification, it is rooted in the most sordid of realities: an old American publicity slogan used already before 1900 and up to the end of the Second World War to collect a windfall of cash especially from the Jewish community. The searing words amounted to the cry ‘Six million of our brothers are dying in Europe [by the acts, according to circumstance, of Poland, the Balkan countries, Tsarist Russia, National-Socialist Germany…]; we await your money for the victims of this holocaust [sic already in 1919]!”
Manuel Valls, our Prime Minister, and François Hollande, President of our Republic, devote themselves to launching, in several foreign countries, warlike crusades of the kind that have backfired horribly for us French this year. To proceed as they do, contrary to the Constitution, they dispense with the approval of Parliament, either in advance or within forty days from the start of operations. On top of their foreign wars, conducted in the most cowardly as well as the most comfortable conditions, they instil an atmosphere of internecine war at home. They call ‘cowards” certain enemies who, after all, are inspired on a grand scale by the practices of our glorious Résistants: ‘Hey, killers with the bullet and the knife, kill quickly!” If François Hollande has the stature of a pedalo admiral, Mr Valls resembles Picrochole, that character in Rabelais whose Greek name means ‘bitter bile” and who regularly gets all excited at the prospect of going off to war. Mr Valls began with a crusade against the Saracens of today and against the real or supposed enemies of Israel but he is also on a campaign against the revisionists, against ‘Dieudonné in peace”, against Marine Le Pen even though she has pushed her own father down the stairs and even against his friends of the Socialist clan. A good suggestion for him would be to calm down, take care of himself, try to laugh with Dieudonné, reflect for a moment with the revisionists, allow historians or researchers to work as they wish and, at long last, spare us the flag-waving frenzy, the bugle-blowing, the verse and chorus of the Marseillaise on the ‘day of glory”, the ‘impure blood” and the ‘ferocious soldiers”. As we know, it is, unhappily, all too easy to take the French in with that sort of thing.
Such, today, are the modest New Year wishes for 2016 that I allow myself to make for that person, for his victims, for the French and for the rest of the world. But is it perhaps already asking too much?
For their part, the revisionists know what awaits them: the confirmation in the mainstream media, sooner or later, that they have already won a total victory on the historical and scientific level. The political and media powers will indeed have to resign themselves to the facts: persistence in gunboat policies abroad and in those of gagging and censorship at home will only dishonour them a bit more. For nothing.
The rising flood, particularly on the Internet, that is bringing to the world’s knowledge the spectacular achievements of historical revisionism is not suddenly going to halt its advance or return towards its source.
The lies of ‘the Holocaust” are modelled on those of the First World War. All those ‘Nazi death-works”, like the ones at Auschwitz, are but a reprise of the myth of German ‘corpse factories” of 1914-1918. They were merely modernised by the adding of gas (Jewish-American version of November 1944) and sometimes of electricity (Jewish-Soviet version of February 1945). The good people, already generally not well disposed towards the practice of cremating the dead, were led to believe that Germany, a nation considered modern and known for having an abundance of engineers and chemists, had built structures containing, in addition to a cremation space, others called ‘gas chambers” (in reality, the ‘depositories”, Leichenhalle or Leichenkeller, technically designed to hold bodies awaiting cremation). Thus a certain propaganda has managed to persuade us that those Germans devils were dumb enough to house under the same roof, on one side, spaces full of a highly inflammable and explosive gas (the hydrocyanic acid or hydrogen cyanide contained in the pesticide Zyklon B, created in the 1920s) and, on the other side, crematory ovens that had to be laboriously brought to a temperature of 900° C.
Germar Rudolf
In 1943 some of the men in charge of British war propaganda deplored ‘this gas chambers story”. For his part, the revisionist Germar Rudolf sums up the subject rather well in his Lectures on the Holocaust (Chicago, Theses & Dissertations Press, 2005, 566 p., p. 82-85). Even Victor Cavendish-Bentinck, a senior official of the Intelligence Service in London ready to believe just about any nonsense said against the Germans, was to write: ‘I feel certain that we are making a mistake in publicly giving credence to this gas chambers story” (p. 83). The trouble was that the British, undisputed champions of lying propaganda during the two world wars, needed those fables. On February 29, 1944 their Ministry of Information sent the BBC and the Church of England a circular letter of the greatest cynicism, requesting their respective cooperation for the spreading of propaganda on the basis of atrocity stories either already in circulation or currently being concocted. It was a matter of forestalling the disastrous effect that the Red Army, an ally, was inevitably to bring about in Central Europe by real atrocities (p. 84)! On these inventions, these fabrications and the wide-scale dissemination of enormous tall tales, two books remain of great interest: Edward J. Rozek’s Allied Wartime Diplomacy: A Pattern in Poland, New York, Wiley, 1958 and, especially, by Walter Laqueur (a Jew born in Breslau in 1921): The Terrible Secret, London, Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1980, 262 p., wherein we see Cavendish-Bentinck, him again, ‘Chairman of the British Intelligence Committee”, writing in July 1943 that ‘The Poles and, to a far greater extent the Jews, tend to exaggerate German atrocities in order to stoke us up” (p. 83).
Fifteen months ago, referring to the crisis that the historians of ‘the Holocaust” were experiencing, I wrote that there was ‘more and more water in their gas, and slack in their knotted rope”. Since January 2015 and the anniversary of the ‘liberation” of Auschwitz I have noted a sudden acceleration of the phenomenon. I have a whole file and a whole demonstration on the subject but the continuing judicial repression has not yet left me time to publish this information. In any case, for the historian, it has become captivating to observe the never-ending agony of the ‘magical gas chamber” (Céline in 1950). This agony is accompanied, as we have seen, by a redoubling of the repression of revisionism and a turning up of the volume of holocaustic propaganda. May our Picrochole refrain, then, from going on the stage and into a trance! He would have a stroke. He might even be cruelly snatched away from us. Who knows? He could precede in death a man who will be 87 years of age on January 25, 2016 and whom some have, thus far in vain, so often sought to kill, not for his ideas (he has hardly any) but for having wanted to publish the result of his research, which is summed up in a phrase of about sixty words. I repeat it here for memory, and to have done with it:

Germar Rudolf
The alleged Hitlerite gas chambers and the alleged genocide of the Jews form one and the same historical lie, which has permitted a gigantic political and financial swindle whose main beneficiaries are the state of Israel and international Zionism and whose main victims are the German people but not their leaders and the Palestinian people in their entirety.
Note: For sources or references especially regarding certain points of this text one may consult the indices of the seven volumes of my Ecrits révisionnistes thus far published. On the Internet, for ‘The Victories of Revisionism” (11 December 2006), see and for ‘The Victories of Revisionism (continued)” (September 11, 2011), see
Aficionados of court rulings by imbeciles are invited to refer to pages 152-155 of the first volume, where there are some titbits from a decision handed down in 1979 by Dame Baluze-Frachet, judge of a Lyon police court. The good lady decreed back then that simply asking the question of the existence of the gas chambers was an affront not only to ‘good morals” but also to ‘the moral order”. The amusing bit of it is that by invoking ‘the moral order” she was advocating although probably unawares a value dear to count MacMahon, Marshal of France, President of the French Republic and perennial model of reactionary conservatism. ‘The moral order” was to return seventy years later on with… Marshal Pétain. As for the aficionados of behavioural curiosities, there is fare for them in the following two videos featuring the current head of the French government: ‘The left hand of Manuel Valls” and ‘Rally of March 19, 2014 speech by Manuel Valls, Minister of the Interior”.
In preparation: 1) an article about an embarrassing secret of Serge Klarsfeld; 2) a study of the highly inflammable and explosive nature of hydrogen cyanide.

{ Comments are closed }

The desperate search for Guy Montag by John Kaminski


Guy Montag, Guy Montag, you think, tapping your fingers on your desk. Where have we heard that name before? Suddenly you remember.
He was the conflicted hero in arguably the most famous science fiction story of all time, something almost everybody in America read in school, and marveled over its frightful foresight. Guy Montag was the enigmatic fireman who burned outlawed books in Ray Bradbury’s epic novel Fahrenheit 451.
One day a woman chose to die with her books. But before she immolated herself, Guy stole a book from her to try to learn why she should do such a thing. Then Guy started smuggling books home. His suicidal wife turned him in to the authorities. When they came to burn down HIS house, Guy turned on his chief, sprayed him with fire, and burned him to a crisp. Following that, Guy escaped and lived with the impoverished intellectual hobos, with the hopeful aim of restoring sanity to a deranged society.
In a series of ironic twists years after it was written, small minded school boards tried to ban Fahrenheit 451 without ever realizing they were unwittingly mimicking the book’s plot — destroying books society has been persuaded not to read because their thoughts were too dangerous.
Bradbury’s narrative describes how Montag gradually began to doubt his mission after he saw how important books were to people willing to die rather than give them up, and his brittle life crumbled around him. When the book’s hero changed his mind about books and what he should be doing to them, he brought the power of the totalitarian state down upon him, before escaping into the shadows and yearning for revolution.
Bradbury never mentioned how that revolution turned out, but the future has revealed an uncanny twist in what the famous science fiction author wrote and the way reality has turned out.
Firemen are supposed to put fires out, but Bradbury’s firemen burned books the government deemed illegal.
This is how our future has progressed; what was once the truth is now a lie. Suddenly, forces once thought necessary and beneficial have now turned into their opposite — a destructive menace.
Think cops killing people’s pets while trying to bust somebody at the wrong address. Or a woman pulled over for not signaling a lane change winds up a few hours later supposedly hanging herself in the cell of a local jail.
Politicians and presidents preach for peace yet incinerate defenseless foreign countries while insisting they are killing innocent people to preserve freedom. It’s the modern variation of the old Vietnam proverb: We had to destroy the village in order to save it.
What is the shocking reversal dominating society today? It should be obvious to you. It’s the false flag syndrome, in which the government creates disasters that it then cleans up and boasts how efficiently and vigilantly it has protected the population. The list of FBI provocations reveals there would be practically no crime at all if not for the sadistic schemes like Oklahoma City and 9/11 that our government cooks up.
Firemen who burn things rather than extinguish them are exactly the opposite of the way things should work in a normal world. Most of us know by now the world is nowhere near normal.
Instead of trying to protect us, the police are killing us in record numbers, and then refusing to say how many they’ve killed, or why.
Today, judges ostensibly profess to protect the rights of individuals but consistently rule in favor of big businesses that demolish these very rights. Instead of seeking justice in courts, the judges and the lawyers are deciding how they can fleece and convict us to fulfill the contracts they have with the private prison corporations to keep the jails full.
And as we have seen most recently in Oregon, the government wants to put us in jail in order to take our land because that land contains valuable minerals that our bellicose bigwigs want to sell to the very corporations that provide the campaign finances that keep them in office. As long as the Hammonds are in jail, we are all incarcerated.
I think the thing that got me thinking about this reversal of intent was the discovery that bodies supposedly massacred in a Paris nightclub turned out to be dummies, mannikins, planted by the spinmeisters who arranged the whole hoax to convince the public that the bloody stunt really happened. <>
This kind of ridiculous effort on the part of the authorities fits right in with the Sandy Hook school affair, in which children were claimed to have been killed but no bodies were ever reported being seen by local hospitals. <> It was a prima facie example of the cops who are supposedly assigned to protect us preventing us from knowing about the truth of a major crime.
The Boston Marathon bombing was another government sponsored charade, with one designated patsy murdered in the streets by police and his brother sentenced to die by a kangaroo court without ever being allowed to speak candidly. <>
The conspiracy conducting this long-running political campaign to get people to give up their guns is insidious and seemingly inextinguishable, despite the fact that it only increases gun sales. It includes the entire Jewish controlled media, of course, and journalists and cops at every level willing to participate in scams for which, in the specific case of Sandy Hook, they are sometimes paid millions of dollars for their participation in the charade. <>
Why does the government want us to give up our guns? To put us all in prison and to take everything we own before eventually taking our lives. The process is well underway, as the Hammond family of Oregon knows so well. Ammon Bundy’s supporters bivouacked in a nearby forest know it, too, and despite the media slander that calls them vigilantes are really defending the rest of us from a future nobody really wants to see — total government control of every aspect of our lives.
The heroes who try to reveal government criminality — Edward Snowden, Michael Hastings, Julian Assange, Bill Cooper — are constantly killed or jailed by those who resent their lucrative criminal schemes being exposed.
The doctors who try to circumvent the poisonous medicines of Big Pharma — James Bradstreet, Theresa Sievers, Nicholas Gonzalez— are suicided by those who want to continue to poison their patients and deny life saving techniques and medicines from people who really need them.
But what sticks in my mind is the similarity between Bradbury’s descriptive prediction of firemen doing exactly the opposite of what they were supposed to be doing — putting out fires instead of lighting them — and the behavior of the U.S. military monster today, murdering innocents for totally false reasons, and the intelligence community creating phony terrorist incidents and then prosecuting and convicting innocent patsies to make government agents look good when in reality they are criminals.
As deranged firemen scorched neighborhoods as well as the minds of would be intellects oppressed by their governments, so our military and police today do exactly the opposite of what they have been charged to do — preserve our safety and defend our freedoms.
Instead they intimidate the majority into silence and leave them cringing in silence while secretly hoping to avoid the fickle finger of fate and a violent SWAT team crashing through their front door even though it is the wrong address.
This is not to say there aren’t heroic individuals in the U.S. military. This would account for all the generals the last few presidents have fired for counseling common sense rather the following homicidal orders.
And now happening in Oregon, quasi government agencies of questionable authenticity steal land from legitimate farmers, throw them in jail, and the dumbfounded population stands around with their mouths open, criticizing those who would save farmers from being hoodwinked out of their land and homes by corrupt judges in kangaroo courts. <>
The potential course of the future now depends on the resolve of a small group of patriots gathered in a cold forest sorely lacking in support from the general population. It is no exaggeration to predict that whatever happens to them will happen to the rest of us.
The Jews who run our country are never going to listen to reason and suddenly strive to behave in a reasonable and rational manner. They are going to keep stealing and killing until they are stopped.
The shooting has to start somewhere. Burns, Oregon might be a sensible place to begin.
But the vast majority of Americans don’t want to be bothered with matters of justice. Even as their privately owned land disappears, stolen by the government, they don’t think these issues will affect them. They just sit home and watch TV and wonder what they’ll do when the ATMs stop working and the banks all close.
At exactly the time we need more people to behave like Guy Montag and stop this slide into insanity when truth is what our voracious government says it is, and justice cannot intrude into the consciousness of a citizenry intent on watching TV and texting their friends, we observe an unprecedented turning away from what needs to be done to survive, and misplaced intent leading to the widespread destruction of our species and every other species as well.
Sorry to have to tell you again, but those who sleep now will be the first ones to die in the very near future. Our criminal, Jew-run government must be disenfranchised, detoxified and, where appropriate, disemboweled as soon as possible.
If you must pick a day to start fighting back, today might just be the best choice of all.
John Kaminski is a writer who lives on the Gulf Coast of Florida, constantly trying to figure out why we are destroying ourselves, and pinpointing a corrupt belief system as the engine of our demise. Solely dependent on contributions from readers, please support his work by mail: 6871 Willow Creek Circle #103, North Port FL 34287 USA.

{ Comments are closed }

Chosen By God: Jewish Religions and The Prospect of Dissent by Gilad Atzmon

Screen Shot 2016-01-01 at 12.37.20 PM

‘The Jewish religion is a religion of Mitzvoth (commandments) and without this religious idiom, the Jewish religion doesn’t exist at all.”
~ Professor Yeshayahu Leibowitz
While Islam and Christianity can be easily understood as belief systems, Judaism actually defies the notion of belief all together. Judaism is an obedience regulative system. The Judaic universe is ruled by ‘mitzvoth’ (commandment), a set of 613 precepts and directives ordered by God. In opposition to Christianity and Islam that build from spiritual and heavenly precepts in worship to a transcendental God, the Judaic subject subscribes to strict earthly and material observance. While the Islamo-Christian is wrapped in God’s loving and the spirituality of the sublime and divinity, the follower of Judaism is judged by his or her ability to adhere to hundreds of rigorous earthly orders.
A brief look at the Judaic Sabbath common prayer reveals the nature of Judaism as an obedience regulatory system. As we can see below, in Judaism, even God-loving is not an involuntary act:
‘You shall love Adonai your God with all your heart,?with all your soul, and with all your might.?Take to heart these instructions with which I charge you this day.
…Thus you shall remember to observe all My commandments?and to be holy to your God.?I am Adonai, your God, who brought you out of the land of Egypt to be your God:?I am Adonai your God.”
(Common Prayers for Shabbat Evening From Deuteronomy and Numbers)
For the Jew, belief and God-loving are not subject to either rational discretion or spiritual impulse. God loving, as we read above, is a strict ‘charge”, an order. But if Judaism is not a belief system, what kind of system is it? Does the Judaic subject believe in anything at all?
The answer is yes: the Jew believes in ‘The Jews’ and the Jews believe in ‘The Jew.’ This mode of mutual affirmation establishes a solid and forceful tribal continuum that serves the collective as well as the singular subject. Accordingly, the subject adheres to the collective and vice versa. In pragmatic terms, the Jew sticks to the ‘chosen people’ and, together the ‘chosenites’ uphold a collective sense of choseness.
In Judaism, ‘choseness’ is the belief that the Jewish people were singularly chosen to enter into a covenant with God. For religious Jews, being chosen is realised as a duty. According to Judaic belief, the Jews have been placed on earth to fulfill a certain purpose. This purpose is bestowed upon the Jews and they pass it from father to son.[1]
In reality, the first Jews invented a God who chose them over all other people. For some reason this God is occasionally cruel, often non-ethical and as if this were not enough, not exactly a nice father. The Jewish God doesn’t even allow his people to call him by name. One may wonder what led the first Jews to invent such a horrid father figure. One may further question what led the Jews to sustain their ‘relationship’ with such an obnoxious father. The answer is surprisingly simple. They don’t.
The Jews don’t believe in God, they are observant of God. They believe in themselves- the Jews believe in ‘The Jew’ and vice versa. Within this peculiar troubled family affair, the Jew is free to dump God, as an author can freely re-write or at least re-shape his or her own narrative. But the Jew can never dump the Jews as much as the Jews can’t allow ‘The Jew’ to go free. And what about God, can he be emancipated, can he choose another people? Certainly not. Unlike the Jew who is free to dump God while clinging to a Jewish identity, the Jewish God is merely a Jewish protagonist, he can’t go anywhere, he is stuck with ‘his’ chosen people forever.
Choseness, so it seems, is hardly a heavenly gift, it is in fact a curse. It confines the Jew in a realm of self-imposed commandment and materiality. Instead of beauty, holiness and the pursuit of the divine and the sublime, the rabbinical Jew is left with an earthly obedience scheme that is sustained by a rigid tribal setting. ‘The Jew’ and ‘The Jews’ are bound in a set of mutual affirmations in which God serves an instrumental role.
Some may rightly argue that this spectacular bond between the Jews and ‘The Jew’ is essential for an understanding of the dichotomy between Judaic tribalism and the universal appeal of Islamo-Christian beliefs.
The Judaic crude intolerance towards dissent serves as an example of the above. Throughout their history, Jews have proven themselves hostile toward their nonconformists; now we are ready to grasp why. For the Islamo-Christian, secularization, for instance, entails a rejection of a transcendental affair. But for the rabbinical Judaic subject, failure to conform constitutes a rejection of the Jews. It interferes crudely with the fragile relationship between ‘The Jew’ and the Jews. It shatters the self-affirmation mechanism. While in the case of Christianity and Islam dumping God suggests turning one’s back on a remote supernatural entity, in the case of Judaism, such an act is interpreted as a disbelief in the tribe.
This interpretation may help illuminate Jesus’ plight. It may explain the reasoning behind the brutal Rabbinical Herem (excommunication) against Spinoza and Uriel Da Costa. And it also explains why the secular and the so-called ‘progressive’ Jew is equally obnoxious towards dissent or any form of criticism from within. If Judaism is not a belief system but rather a system of obedience regulation, then Jewish identity politics is merely an extension of the above regulatory philosophy.
Jews often drop their God, simply to invent a different God who ‘facilitates’ subscription to a new regulatory system. The new system, like the old outlines a new set of strict commandments, a manner of speech and rigorous boundaries of ‘kosher’ conduct.
In the beginning of the 20th century, for instance, Bolshevism appealed to many Eastern European Jews. It provided a sense of self-righteousness in addition to regulating a strict form of obedience. As we know, it didn’t take long for Bolshevism to mature into a genocidal doctrine that made Old Testament barbarism look like a juvenile fairytale. The Holocaust, that seems to be the most popular Jewish religion at present, may be the ultimate and final stage in Jewish historical development. According to the Holocaust religion, ‘God died in Auschwitz.’ Within the context of the Holocaust religion, ‘The Jew’ is the new Jewish God. The Holocaust religion has finally united ‘The Jew’ and the Jews into a self-sufficient comprehensive and independent ‘God-less’ religious narrative. Both were about to be eradicated. But, not only were they both saved: they have prevailed and each did so independently. In the Holocaust religion, Jews are both victims and oppressors they have transformed slavery into empowerment and they did it all alone, in spite of being dumped by their treacherous God. The Holocaust religion, like Judaism, prescribes a manner of speech and a strict set of commandments. Most crucially, like more traditional Judaism, it is totally and disgracefully intolerant toward dissent.
Due to the lack of a divine transcendental entity, Jewish religions have always regarded criticism as rejection of the tribe. Jewish religions, whether Judaism, Bolshevism or Holocaust, are equally intolerant towards criticism and dissent. Jewish religions treat opposition as a vile attempt at ‘delegitimization’ on the verge of genocidal inclination.
Jewish religions can be defined as different templates that facilitate a sense of choseness. They affirm a bond between an imaginary marginal ‘collective’ and a phantasmal ‘archetype’: the Bolshevists and ‘The Bolshevik’, the Survivours and ‘The Survivour’, the Jews and ‘The Jew,’ and so on. The bond between the collective and the idea of an archetypical singularity is always maintained by a set of rigid commandments, a correct manner of speech, some strict regulatory guidelines for behavior and vile opposition to dissent.
Tragically enough, intolerance of dissent has become a universal Western political symptom. Incidentally, Christianity, Islam, religion and divinity in general are also under attack within the context of contemporary Western discourse. Is this a symptom of the Jerusalemification of our Western universe? Is the emergence of the tyranny of political correctness a coincidence? And if we are becoming Jews, is there any room for the hope that our universe may, at some stage, embrace a universal ethos once again? Can we once again believe in something? Or do we have to wait for a new Jesus figure to resurrect our trust in the human spirit and humanity in general? Or have we been re-designed to self-destruct as soon as we come close to such a lucid awareness?
[1] As God himself suggests in the Book of Genesis: ‘And I (God) will establish My covenant between Me and you (the Jews) and your descendants after you in their generations, for an everlasting covenant, to be God to you and your descendants after you.” (Book of Genesis, Chapter 17).

{ Comments are closed }

Show-down at the Kol Shofar Synagogue: An Expose on Jewish Racism By Arthur Topham

Show-down at the Kol Shofar Synagogue: An Expose on Jewish Racism
By Arthur Topham
January 16, 2009
The trouble with you
Is the trouble with me
You got two good eyes
But you still don’t see.
~ The Grateful Dead/Casey Jones

Yet we must also respect those who simply protest anything less than full immediate denouncement of openly-declared racism, as Zionism defines itself to be, and as practiced for decades by the ‘Jewish State’ constantly expanding the turf of its supremacy. In all other cases of openly-declared state-racism, the ordinary, moderate response is to give the racist policies primary emphasis and absolute Zero tolerance. Delaying that frankness does perpetuate the cover-up which has managed to keep the gory Elephant of Zionist racism the best-kept secret in our living-room of ostensible egalitarianism.
~ Dave Kirsting, concerned Marin County, California resident

One of the great joys and blessings of being a publisher is the opportunity it provides for connecting up with interesting people from around the world.

Whether it’s a short congratulatory note from Noam Chomsky; a friendly request for further info on Ricardo Warmouse from David Icke; a polite, personal invite from Jeff Rense for an interview; a gentle email from Layla Anwar; or a long, intensely humorous and perspicacious hand-written letter, replete with comic drawings!, from my dear American sister Carolyn Chute (author of The Beans of Egypt Maine and other exceptional books on the human condition), all of them and many more comprise a legacy of intimate contacts. It’s these brief interludes with companion souls in the seemingly endless struggle to achieve peace and justice for all that help to compensate for the otherwise interminable and at times exasperating amount of energy expended in the operation of a thus far free and alternative news media.

In some respects each new day is like Christmas morning for a child raised in the belief that gifts are a result of living in harmony with a loving God and treating each other as we would like to be treated. And there is no gift so precious as that of discovering new friendships and realizing one is not alone, either in their feelings, their perspective or in the physical world that we all share.

One such gift for me was an email on Christmas day from a cyber friend who lives in Marin County, California. His name is Dave Kirsting. Dave has been a part of my Radical Press List Serve for some time and receives the assorted articles and analysis of global political events that I pass on to subscribers. On this occasion Dave was writing in regards to a short article of Layla Anwar’s entitled, Jingle Bells and all that Stuff… which I had sent out on December 24th.

As this is an article about Dave and his personal experiences with political Zionism as they pertain to the Arab Jewish predicament in the Middle East and how such explosive events tend to spread out over the globe like ash from an active volcano only to settle in small communities everywhere where one finds the Zionist mindset, I will let him do most of the talking (so to speak). Dave is, in my humble opinion, a very articulate, caring and astute thinker, aware of certain basic truths that I feel need to be shared with a much greater audience.

His initial email:

‘Thank you Arthur, and Merry Christmas, and thanks for all your work.

Myself, I am so unusual as to see all discussions and arguments as pleasant gifts to me, regardless of how others may feel or how they often interpret kinds words in the fair game of dialogue. I recall once sending a comment to you regarding what I saw as perhaps a word-choice oversight, what could be called an ‘error’ and a ‘correction,’ and you responded so sensibly as to leave that lesser paradigm floating along somewhere below. This is why I always welcome emails from RadicalPress.

I am sitting here drinking my meticulously selected and brewed and consequently superb coffee on Christmas morning, waiting for my friends (including the most magically delightful woman I have ever met) to arrive in a few hours for our lascivious indulgence of lavish gift-giving, my Druidic solstice-tree all sparkling with lights and ornaments (alongside my lofty view of Mount Tamalpais, amid the blowing trees, swirling white clouds, and sparkling sunlight of Southern Marin’s characteristically colliding micro-climates), to celebrate the arrival of full consciousness, a couple thousand years ago, when East met West, the discovery of a loving universe, or ‘God,’ the primacy of self-honesty, the proffered escape from wrathful paradigms, denials, and conceits, as it was all voluntarily embraced by the best of the Celts, wherever this new dimension of ever-returning life was superimposed over the message already inherent in their sacred evergreens.

Ms. Anwar is fundamentally correct, though a few semantic adjustments should be made, so her meaning will be clear enough for anyone willing to understand

For one thing, the truth has always been almost 100% lost in human denial, as exploited through the concerted efforts of Zionist atheists.

The Christened one always said his perfect advice could be understood by all but would be honored by terribly few. The forces that killed him, with his consent, have always remained in power and continue to try and kill his message, but they cannot do so, any more than they could even retain possession of his body, after it was dead.

The blame can’t be placed on any ‘leadership,’ as those of us who have always struggled directly among the people can attest. Unwilling to recognize their errors and vanities, most people are willingly susceptible to the open violations of due process by which Zionists embedded in the various peace movements quash any germination of political understanding. This infects virtually everyone certainly every Arab and/or Palestinian discussion-list as ‘leading’ Zionists, like Jeff Blankfort, Jeffrey Halper, Richard Becker, and all the others pose themselves as the most ‘radical’ ‘critics of Israel with the added advantage of being ‘Jewish’ or ‘leftist’ and therefore more credible and firmly prevent any pithy understanding of the flaming racism which they consistently ‘overlook.’ We who have won the only recorded victories against Zionism, by using the same principles taught to all children in US public schools, have been kicked off every Palestinian and Arab discussion-lists for saying unflattering but meticulously logical and polite things about the (mis)leading Jewish defenders of Palestine. Saying that an argument that ends with ‘end the occupation’ and/or ‘two-state peace’ is an essentially Zionist argument is reduced to ‘How dare you call our brave, Jewish, media-connected hero a Zionist?!?!’

The front lines of the anti-Zionist effort are way deep inside the ‘peace movement’ and deep inside the ostensible ‘anti-Zionist effort,’ and Bush is the natural figurehead of this problem, nothing like its cause.

‘The leaders’ are not responsible; we get the only ‘leaders’ that can be elected while Zionism holds the swing votes in every contest and in every decision of every ‘peace and justice’ organization. Progress cannot begin anywhere until it begins in our dialogue with terminally distracted Palestinian and Arab leadership and in our efforts within the long-dormant ‘peace movement.’ All other blame is a mere distraction, far to the rear of the real front lines and often intentionally extracting attention from them. The worst disparagement of the real fighters comes from the ‘Palestinian’ and ‘anti-Zionist’ side of the struggle, and this is exactly what the most cynical Zionists mean when they laugh about how they ‘control both sides of the debate.’

But the point of Christmas is that freedom is an individual issue.; ‘Narrow is the way and strait the gate that leads unto life and few there be who find it.’ ‘Those who have ears, let them hear.’ And we who really do live at the actual center of world events and who make a good living by creating the most revolutionary changes in the way children are raised are also able to express the true meaning of Christmas in the sparkle and decadent pleasures of a God who truly loves all of us. It’s up to us. The full luck of this perfect situation is accessible only to those who care to see it all. The Whole Truth loves us and it won’t go away.’

The ‘illegality of the occupation’

Following this came another letter on December 30th regarding what Dave feels is the crux of the argument used by the Zionists to shift the focus of debate away from the fundamental problem onto a secondary issue, that of the ‘illegality of Israel’s brutal occupation’.

He states:

The Zionists love to make us think so. Because they can so easily say that they would love to ‘give the land back,’ and that they’ve been trying for decades to do so, but the bloodthirsty Palestinians aren’t happy unless they’re killing Jews. That’s why the most active ‘two-state peace’ Zionists energetically propagate the slogan ‘End the Occupation’ to make sure that the real core issue is not noticed. The real core issue is the one about the whole basic problem, from which ‘the occupation’ is merely an aspect. The real core issue is also the one argument that cannot be answered and the one argument that clarifies the entire situation for all ordinary Americans the one argument that shows the wrong of every Zionist policy, the dream argument of an anti-war lifetime and the only argument the Zionists don’t want to hear: THE ARGUMENT AGAINST OPENLY-DECLARED RACISM.

A Jewish state any Jewish state forced into multi-ethnic Palestine or perpetuated in any part of Palestine is violent state-racism as plain as it can ever get. All the violence the racist denial of Palestinian return, the racist creation of new ‘Jewish Only’ settlements, the ‘targeted executions,’ the sharpshooting of Palestinian children who throw stones at Israeli tanks, oh, and even ‘the occupation’ can all be AND CONSTANTLY IS explained away as a necessary response to Palestinian violence. But all of it, in all its varieties including ‘the [post-‘67] occupation’ is an inherent aspect of the openly-declared racist violence of forcing an ethnic-supremacist state into a multi-ethnic region.

Invoking this reality and never straying from it the actual core issue, in its full moral inexcusability is essential to winning any argument or conflict with Zionism.

Saying that the core problem is the occupation plays right into the Zionists’ desire to keep peace-talks stuck in the hopeless 65-year-old boondoggle of seeking peace through a ‘realistic’ two-state scenario. This just happens to perpetuate Jewish supremacy in most of Palestine, while making that racist violence feel more and more like a reasonable status-quo, even as the ‘negotiations’ toward an inherently unworkable racist ‘solution’ cannot begin to get off the ground, thus maintaining the perfect background for ever more ‘reactions’ in ‘self-defense’ against Palestinians, and an expanded occupation in ‘self-defense.’

Playing the ‘two-state peace’ charade has the added benefit, for Zionists, of seducing the various ‘peace movements’ into ‘discreetly’ avoiding any ‘radical’ or ‘rejectionist’ talk about simply ending the racism. That is why Israel’s openly-declared racism was not mentioned at all by any of the ‘anti-war’ organizations in the run-up to ‘the war’ on Afghanistan and ‘the war’ on Iraq despite the fact that the racist core of the entire Middle East conflict would have been the strongest argument against those spin-off ‘wars’. Protecting Zionist interests in ‘ending the occupation’ and ‘two-state peace’ required discreetly avoiding the anti-racist argument because it impinges against the whole ‘two-state’ concept: and avoiding that argument against the Zionists’ moral Achilles Heel neutered the entire anti-war effort, thus perfectly serving Zionist interests in annihilating the still-resisting nations of Afghanistan and Iraq.

Zionist racism is the core issue; any other instance of openly-declared ethnic-supremacy would be treated as racism and would be given primary emphasis and zero-tolerance by all concerned; anyone who fails to do so in the case of Israel has already internalized some of the racist indoctrination. Overlooking or protecting the racist core issue in any of its aspects has the effect of nurturing it everywhere.

The ethnically-based Zionist violence began several decades before ‘the occupation.’ The REAL ‘occupation’ which must be addressed and which can be addressed to ordinary Americans very easily is the occupation of ANY PART OF PALESTINE by an openly-declared racist-supremacist Israel.

The obvious solution the one the Zionists succeed in keeping off of everyone’s minds and lips is to simply stop financing any and all policies of prejudice in the Israel-Palestine conflict. Every schoolchild in the US is taught the need to reject ethnic or religious prejudice. It is unconstitutional to finance it with our taxes. All we have to do is object to the RACISM, and all the derivative violence including the denial of Palestinian return, the Jewish-supremacist definition of Israel, the ‘Jewish Only’ settlements, and of course ‘the occupation’ dry up naturally.’

For Dave, ‘The question, combined with emphasis on ‘the occupation,’ shows confusion, but the answer is simple.; Israel will stop its racist violence against the Palestinians only when Israel’s OPENLY DECLARED RACISM is acknowledged for what it is the core of the problem and when international support for it, by people who do not mean to support racism, is correspondingly withdrawn. The ‘lands and freedom’ which the international community must force Israel to return must never be confined to the [post-‘67] ‘occupied territories.’ The violence will expand until the world frankly stops financing any and all Israeli policies of ethnic or religious prejudice: racism. Peace cannot begin unless it includes far more than just ‘ending the occupation.’ It must also include ending the racist violence which prevents Palestinian families from returning to their lands and homes, and it must also include ending every other policy of prejudice against the non-Jewish inhabitants of Israel-Palestine.

Thanks for all your great work Arthur.; Getting the exact argument organized is essential to success which derives only from grabbing the racist Achilles Heel and never letting go for a moment, as the Zionists will try to change the subject to ANYTHING else, particularly ‘the occupation.’’

Killing for votes

Following close on the heels of these comments in a subsequent response to Gilad Atzmon’s recent article, ‘How Israeli leaders kill for their people’s vote’ Dave continues:

I would add that everything he says about ‘Israelis’ applies also to American Zionists including those who are surprised to discover Israel’s essential racism and then find that this does not induce them to audibly oppose racist violence that was never really disguised in the first place.

The blindness of US Zionist support for Israel is not caused by an urgent need to support something which cannot be justified as it really is, in plain sight. That notion, like all excuses for Israel, requires ‘angry’ denial of reason. The cause and effect go the other way.; The luxurious chauvinistic approval Israel enjoys from US Zionists is the source of the unlimited financial support provided by all US taxpayers (over eight million dollars a day) wangled from us through our inability to believe the obvious truth our Zionist friends, neighbors, and mass-media want us to deny. That unlimited support, with no questions asked, is what causes Israeli policies to be determined by the psychopaths who inevitably rise to top Israeli leadership by getting the quickest, bloodiest results: the policies that take utmost advantage of unlimited money and no accountability.

The geographic distance and psychic disconnect between the complacent soccer-mom Zionists among us and the hideous results of their comfy support for Israel, is exactly the disconnect that allows unthinkable barbarism ‘the insanity of war’ to prevail in Palestine and all the spin-off wars in the Middle East, belying all our espoused beliefs. The pleasing congeniality of our Zionist friends turns to resentment and censorship if we mention the ethnic-cleansing of Palestine. And that hostile reaction, just inside the congenial surface, is the near end of the racist violence which, at the other end, slaughters perfectly innocent men, women, and children, as ‘regrettably required’ for the constant expansion of an officially ‘Jewish’ state in multi-ethnic Palestine.’

The Marin Peace Justice Coalition and the Kol Shofar Synagogue Show-down

The perspective thus far presented is the background gestalt to a culminating event which took place in the community of Tiburon, Marin County, California at the Kol Shofar Synagogue Monday, January 12th at 7:00 P.M.

The local ‘Marin Peace and Justice Coalition’ had issued an open invitation to all concerned residents to join the Marin Jewish community on this evening for ‘prayers for peace, remarks by community and faith leaders followed by an opportunity to discuss the crisis in Israel and Gaza.’ In addition, as the contact person, Suzan Berns Berns,[email protected] stated in the announcement, ‘I strongly encourage you to attend this gathering. This is the time to listen, to learn, to speak and to be changed.’

At the same time and place another contingent of protesters had also made plans to be outside the synagogue expressing their opposition to ‘Israel’s Gaza genocidal slaughter’ as organizer Bill Rothman stated.’The slaughter goes on. This is chance, right in our own backyard, to show that there is strong opposition to Israel’s ongoing Gaza slaughter of the Palestinians.’

These two initiatives prompted Dave to write the following to some of his associates:

‘Most interesting It’s a whole new dimension of activism, involving the ‘Marin Peace and Justice Coalition,’ which has been totally dominated and muzzled by its Zionist, apartheid ‘two-state peace’ activists ever since its creation, right after 9/11.

It seems there will be a ‘dialogue’ between peace activists and long-standing, hard-core Zionists, claiming to represent ‘the Marin Jewish Community,’ and there will also be a protest of the dialogue, both at the same time and place, this Monday, in Tiburon.

The protest is a whole new dimension of activism in Marin and in the anti-war movement.

The contact-person for the ‘protest’ is Bill Rothman who was one of the leaders suppressing honest dialogue about Zionism in the ‘peace movement’ eight years ago, when the crises of the past eight years were clearly beginning. Perhaps Rothman has actually changed. Many people have.; Or maybe this is yet another effort by Zionists to maintain control of anti-war energies that have been aroused more seriously than ever: by the full revelation of what Zionism has always meant, now seen all too clearly in the ongoing, extended ‘Christmas Massacre’ of Palestinians in Gaza.

My very well informed belief is that a friendly constructive dialogue with Jewish people and the ‘Jewish Community’ is exactly what is most needed: so that those in the Jewish community who are willing to audibly protest the patent racist violence of forcing an expressly Jewish state into Palestine or of perpetuating the ethnic-cleansing of the past can step forward and declare this commendable transformation.; And those who refuse this special opportunity now that there can be no possible excuse for further self-deception can be specifically identified as the violent racists their refusal proves them to be.

To a real ‘peace’ activist, protesting a long-overdue dialogue is seen as jumping the gun, particularly in a mini-community of recalcitrant ‘peace activists’ which has long been the primary obstacle to polite, valid, pro-peace dialogue thus playing a key role in assuring that the realities would go totally nuts, as they now have in Israel-Palestine.

Yet, there is good reason to doubt the sincerity of a ‘Jewish community’ dialogue when it is led by notorious Zionists. Still, I believe the offer should be accepted in good faith. Perhaps people are really changing. If this offer proves false, protests against the Zionist ‘Jewish Community’ and its stubbornly racist leaders at their community gathering-places should proceed in full confidence of having tried everything.

Yet we must also respect those who simply protest anything less than full immediate denouncement of openly-declared racism, as Zionism defines itself to be, and as practiced for decades by the ‘Jewish State’ constantly expanding the turf of its supremacy.; In all other cases of openly-declared state-racism, the ordinary, moderate response is to give the racist policies primary emphasis and absolute Zero tolerance. Delaying that frankness does perpetuate the cover-up which has managed to keep the gory Elephant of Zionist racism the best-kept secret in our living-room of ostensible egalitarianism.

So ‘dialogue’ or ‘protest’: it’s anyone’s choice, at the same time and place.

I urge everyone who can make it: come to either the dialogue or the protest of the dialogue. I myself will attend the dialogue with complete sympathy for the protesters and with equal hopes for understanding with the Jewish community and very interested to see how leading Zionists will respond to the no-longer-deniable truth: the perfectly patent racism and violence of forcing a ‘Jewish’ state into a multi-ethnic region.

Let’s all be perfectly polite to each other. What is demonstrably racist should be described as such politely. And it should politely receive no more of our massive tax-financing.

The result

On January 14th I received the results of this ‘gathering’, one which Dave had called ‘the story of the decade’. His letter contained the details of his personal experiences plus his final ‘corrective letter’ to the Jewish Community Relations Council. As he said by way of introduction:

‘As always, when Zionism is involved, there was a gross misrepresentation.

But the significance of what transpired remains. The conflict between the realities of Zionism and the decent standards of the world and of our local neighborhoods becomes increasingly stark.

My corrective letter to the Jewish Community Relations Council (to whom the original nice-sounding announcement was attributed) is necessarily long, and I never ‘expect’ anyone to read anything I offer but this situation, the near-end of the wrongs we see in Palestine, is surely more significant than most of what is said on related subjects in the media.’

Here is what happened. [the following is directed to the Jewish Community Relations Council (JCRC) Ed.]

I live in Tiburon, just a few blocks from Kol Shofar. I have many dear friends all around here, including many Jewish friends of course. I attended the event with high expectations, based on a representation whose origin appears to be you [the JCRC Ed.] and local representatives of the ‘Jewish community.’ As I have sometimes attended events of this kind and have always found the Jewish community quite open to challenging ideas, for the sake of peace in Israel as well as the entire region, I came prepared with some written, one-page copies of the best position I know for full equality in Israel-Palestine, in furtherance of the belief that human equality is fundamental to peace: the case for ending all US funding for any and all policies of ethnic or religious discrimination, by any side, involved in the Israel-Palestine conflict what all American children are taught to expect of their communities and country.

The last time I attended an event of this kind at the Osher Marin JCC I found a very large and friendly group discussing my ideas with me, kindly and attentively, and a number of people had asked where they could get my ideas in written form, so I came prepared. The extensive security at the Kol Shofar event struck me as reasonable, in these times, underlined by the presence of some nearby ‘protesters,’ who had apparently deigned to bypass the announced opportunity for constructive dialogue. And when someone near the door asked to see what was in my (paper) folder, I was pleased to hand it to him. The exact content did not appear to matter. The person looked at the paper for no more than two seconds, apparently deemed the ideas inconsistent with his own, and immediately threatened me with violence and ordered me to leave. The man told me that ‘This is private property, and you will be arrested if you don’t leave immediately.’

Naturally floored at this vulgar expression of violent discourtesy from Kol Shofar, I asked ‘Because I possess these ideas?’ The answer was ‘Yes.’ I had not given any papers to anyone, nor would I have felt mistreated if someone had asked me to leave them at the door. Thinking of the genteel announcement from the JCRC, I tried to ask while turning away ‘Are you aware that this event has been advertised as a community discussion?’ Before I could finish the first three words, I was interrupted with ‘No more words. Just leave.’ Tiburon Police officers, correctly doing their duty on behalf of private-property laws, closed in to properly enforce this grotesque misuse of local law and subversion of our Constitutional free speech. The invading extremists clearly know how to misuse our society’s standards and law-enforcement as a means of mere, subjective violence.

The attitude expressed by these representatives of Kol Shofar was not professional firmness; it was brute contempt for anyone outside their very narrow ethnic profile quite eye-opening, coinciding as it does with the impressions we are getting from Zionist behavior in Gaza.

With wonderfully telling coincidence, I had just encountered a long-time friend of mine, a young man of the finest courtesy and reputation, who grew up three blocks from Kol Shofar and whom I have known since he was an eleven-year-old child in my kids’ program a member of Kol Shofar who had come to join his mother, an Israeli citizen, who was saving a seat for him inside. But, because he had been talking with me, he was threatened and ordered to leave too. His astonished ‘But why are you telling me to leave?’ was cut short by the same ‘No more words’ threat, which was directed at both of us and enforced with ominous encirclement by misused local police. Though my friend was utterly polite, quiet, and cooperative, as is his way, his dismay and severe disillusionment were perfectly obvious, so he was escorted all the way to his car by four police-officers, apparently trained in recognizing emotion. In contrast, I was trusted to walk to my car unescorted.

Another young friend of mine another of the best-loved and finest young men in Southern Marin, having also lived right here all his life arrived shortly after I left, expecting to see me at this ‘time to listen, to learn, to speak, and to be changed.’ Apparently my blonde young friend also failed to fit the preferred profile. Though cell-phones were used by various people at the event, my friend’s call to me, to see if I had changed my plans, brought the same threats and violent ejection from our sadly misrepresented ‘Jewish community.’; (I trust you realize that total control over another person, when imposed by convincing threats of immediate violence, is properly called ‘violence.’)

Apparently, my other friend’s Israeli mother fit the preferred profile, as she spoke on her cell-phone with her son when he failed to arrive as expected and she was not subjected to ethnic-cleansing.

This was clearly a case of an alien culture, with no concept of our constitutional principles, such as human equality and free speech, taking over a piece of local real-estate, and using our private-property laws and local police to enforce principles completely contradictory to American and local values.

Yet none of this was any inconvenience to my friends or me. As I said in my final words to the Kol Shofar people, ‘This is all the information I could want.’

Though my friends, especially the Kol Shofar member, were stunned at this behavior, they found this experience corresponding all too well with what they have been seeing in the news about Gaza, their personal distress mere droplets in the ocean of horror which is ethnic-cleansing.

We had come to learn and be changed, and we certainly learned! I hope you will share in this windfall of insight.

The foremost victims of the behavior we experienced are the Jewish people, from whom the glaring truths of Zionist ethnic-cleansing so unchecked and thus ever more virulent and so essential to understanding the natural reasons for the world’s increasing anger could not be hidden by anything less than the incredible behavior that was manifest at Kol Shofar.

As a secondary matter, if you and the JCRC were misrepresented in a false announcement, you might wish to take some action against the culprits. Or, if the horrific actuality of the Kol Shofar event belies your and the JCRC’s good intentions using your lovely depiction to historically camouflage what was in fact an invasive, racist war-rally you will probably want to contact everyone to whom your announcement was sent, correct the record, apologize, and explain what steps you and the JCRC will be taking to repair the damage.

As for my friends and I, we greatly appreciate the announcement attributed to you, as our experience has been essential to understanding the problem of unchecked Zionism: if we had not tried to attend this event, the horrific realities just under the local surface, the near-end of what is happening in Gaza, would not have established themselves as important local history.

That manifest reality now adds to the burden of the extremists’ growing and obviously desperate cover-up and must awaken those interested in peace for Israel and in service to the Jewish community and its relations with the general community.

The positive aspects of Zionism must not cause a blindness to its negative potentials or allow them to continue so unchecked as the world is seeing in Gaza and as we have now found violating our dear Tiburon neighborhood.

I hope you and the JCRC will take steps to represent the majority of the Jewish community, in its distance from very harmful misrepresentation by international Zionist extremism which manifested itself in Tiburon on Monday evening.’

Dave’s ‘Corrective Letter’

Dear Ms. Berns,

I think you would wish to know that a serious misrepresentation was made and attributed to you and the Jewish Community Relations Council regarding the gathering at Kol Shofar at 7:30, on Monday, January 12.

I have copied the text of the announcement I received through the Marin Peace and Justice Coalition. [see above. Ed.]

Perhaps those words were not authorized by you and/or the JCRC, or perhaps they expressed a misapprehension.

In any case, the actual event proved to be the diametric opposite of what was described, and the effect was to create a disaster for Jewish community relations the scope of this ‘disaster’ determined only by the number of people who learn the truth or by the effectiveness of corrective efforts, perhaps by the JCRC.

I should add that this ‘disaster for Jewish community relations’ was also a valuable windfall of discovery for everyone who is actually ‘praying for peace, working for justice.’ While the error in the announcement of the Kol Shofar event drew people who would not otherwise have attended, there was no mistaking what we found what is actually going on in our community and the unacceptable realities call for a reassessment of the situation by all decent people, including you and the JCRC.

It is not so much a question of correcting an announcement, but rather an urgent need to correct misapprehensions about an illness in Zionism itself. What we have discovered is precisely the hostile and violent behavior, intruding into our dear neighborhoods at this local end, which correspond to the worst interpretations of the hostile and violent behavior we see expressed by the same organizations at the far end, in Palestine: where people don’t enjoy the protections we still have here.

Within the event itself, one speaker said it was not intended as a dialogue or discussion (thus contradicting the announcement attributed to you), but merely as a gathering of a local ‘congregation’ at a time of crisis for the state of Israel.

The content of the speeches conspicuously overlooking the most obvious explanation: the extremist racism of forcing a ‘Jewish’ state and ‘Jewish’ dominion ever deeper into a multi-ethnic region was clearly meant to fool the local Jewish congregation into excessive fears of unjustified, insane violence and anti-Semitism. This deception would of course promote the alternate approach the extreme folly of seeking ‘security’ through ethnic supremacy, with all its intrinsic slaughter an approach which does, in the short run, produce enormous profits for opportunists calling themselves ‘Zionists’ and falsely posing as representatives of ‘all Jews everywhere’.

The real effect of the Kol Shofar event was to trick decent, peace-loving Jewish people into overlooking what might very well be the best means of protecting Israel:; encouraging reform toward Twentieth Century ideas of egalitarianism, instead of the time-dishonored strategy of ethnic dominion. The event organizers’ utterly hostile attitude even toward a Jewish member of the Kol Shofar Congregation (who evidently did not quite fit their ‘profile’) demonstrated a mission of promoting the most racist kind of Zionism, quite to the detriment of ordinary Jewish people as well as everyone else who would never knowingly approve any such thing.

To various local residents, who were impressed by the announcement attributed to you but who were summarily deemed unfit for attendance, what actually transpired at Kol Shofar conveyed an unmistakable message: an exceedingly hostile takeover of our neighborhood and community by an alien culture that treats everyone else as less than subhuman. (In our neighborhood, people treat animals with more courtesy than we found in these mis-representatives of ‘the Jewish community.’) It became clear that the slightest variance from a narrow ethnic or cultural profile was sufficient cause for immediate threats of violence, misrepresented as the Jewish community’s way of telling people they are not welcome.

This was not a question of ‘security,’ as perfectly polite local residents were shown no courtesy at all: there was no ‘I’m sorry but we have to observe some strict security requirements’: just terse orders to leave immediately, expressed with threats of immediate violent arrest if we hesitated or even said anything. The first impressions of thuggish, foreign-looking security-people in uniform dark suits and foreign accents could be brushed aside in our pluralistic society, but the natural premonitions proved unequal to the realities which soon appeared: a scene like a neighborhood house that has been taken over by mafia goons or crack-dealers who exhibit nothing but utter contempt for the surrounding community.

I, myself, have operated a children’s center in Southern Marin for fifteen years; I am known to nearly everyone in our community, having been entrusted with many thousands of the local children, and I certainly do not exaggerate about gross violations of our decent traditional values belligerent, arrogant, invasive violations, the most extreme I have ever encountered anywhere.

I take every experience in a positive light, as a chance to learn something, and this experience provided a stunning but beautifully telling insight into attitudes which shed disconcerting light on the problem we thought we would be able to discuss in a civilized way: the dynamics behind the slaughter of ‘non-Jewish’ Palestinians, for the ‘security’ of an expressly ‘Jewish’ state relentlessly forcing its Zionist supremacy into a multi-ethnic region much as we have now found Kol Shofar (inadvertently?) doing to our decent, friendly neighborhood in Tiburon. It was all too easy to see: if we perfectly respectable neighbors of Kol Shofar and even a member of the Congregation could be summarily ejected with no word other than convincing threats of instant violence simply because we did not suit an incredibly arrogant ethnic profile it is very easy to see how this alien behavior would be applied to the Palestinians who are similarly deemed unfit for human treatment and, unlike us, have no protection at all, in the areas controlled by the same international organizations that show such hostile contempt for American values and the local community, right here in Tiburon.

If the conduct of the event-organizers does not coincide with what is going on in Gaza, why would local supporters of Israel’s actions subject their negatively profiled neighbors to the most extreme version of such treatment that they can legally get away with? If we try to imagine what racist invaders of Palestine might look like, or what behavior we would expect of them, if any could be found here in Marin County, we would find our worst images precisely fitting the appearance and behavior that ruled at Kol Shofar on Monday evening.

It is very alarming that these people believe they can behave that way right here in Tiburon, in an incredibly arrogant sense of total impunity and perfect contempt for any concerns about the message this sends to everyone outside the preferred profile the vast majority of local residents.’

Final radical commentary

Although overly lengthy for a standard internet article the import of Dave Kirsting’s message is vital to gaining the required insight necessary for a full understanding of both the gravity of what has been occurring in Palestine over the past six decades and the reason why it has prevailed for such a disastrously and unacceptably long period.

Dave’s thesis gives both form and substance to the undeniable fact that in order to fully comprehend the dynamics of political Zionism’s imminent and deadly danger to the world at large we must frame it within its legitimate context that being the crucial recognition that political Zionism is, first and foremost, a racist ideology and a mindset or paradigm which can never peacefully co-exist with any other multi-ethnic, pluralistic society anywhere upon the face of the planet. As such it cannot be allowed to continue in present form. This demands the dismantling of its fundamental ideological infrastructure for the good of the rest of humanity. If such actions do not occur within a reasonable amount of time the result may be a terminal state of chaos and destruction well beyond the already unacceptable levels we’re now witnessing in war-ravaged Gaza.

As the suffering and dying continues and the horror and shock of the last twenty days of genocide casts its long and dark shadow over our world this issue of Jewish racism screams out, like the cries of the Gazan victims of Israeli genocide, for universal recognition and amelioration. For the sake of all mankind we must work to ensure the knowledge of what Dave tells us spreads across the net and into the hearts and minds of peace-loving people everywhere.

Thank you Dave Kirsting for bringing your perspective forth. Your contribution to Life and Peace is sincerely appreciated.

{ Comments are closed }

Merry Christmas and a Happy, Hopeful New Year from


Dear Radical Readers and Friends of Freedom of Speech Everywhere,
On behalf of my wife Shastah and myself I would like to thank everyone who has been standing with over the past year and longer in my ongoing struggle to defend the legal right of all Canadians, as stated in the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, to be able to express their thoughts and viewpoints on the Internet and in other media without fear of being attacked and persecuted by the government of Canada via the use of Sec. 319(2) of the Criminal Code.
This past year saw the case move to the actual stage of trial which commenced in the B.C. Supreme Court, Quesnel, Canada on October 26, 2015 and ran until November 12, 2015 when the jury of 8 women and 4 men found me guilty in Count 1 and not guilty in Count 2 of the identical charge that I did ‘willfully promote hatred against an identifiable group, people of the Jewish religion or ethnic origin, contrary to Section 319(2) of the Criminal Code.’
As a result of this peculiar and strange ruling the stage has been now set for the continuation of my Charter challenge to Sec. 319(2) in the coming new year. The time when this challenge will occur is yet to be determined but the week beginning January 25, 2016 will see a date fixed for the Constitutional argument to be heard.
In the event that my Charter argument fails to convince the Supreme Court that Sec. 319(2) is in violation of Sec. 2b of Canada’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms then I will then have the right to appeal the decision of the court on Count 1 that was handed down November 12, 2015.
There were a number of extenuating circumstances that arose during the actual trial which will, of necessity, come to the forefront in the appeal and portend a strong case for having the decision tossed out and a not guilty decision rendered. Space here doesn’t allow for any elaboration on the process but the new evidence will be forthcoming in the new year.
As of today I am still raising money in order to purchase the transcripts from the trial. Not only does the legal process in this country unfairly work against the individual through unjust legislation such as Sec. 319(2) of the criminal code but when forced to defend oneself against such specious forms of ‘thought crime’ laws the costs incurred are then further exacerbated by the state in the form of the victim having to pay exorbitant costs for the transcripts of the proceedings in order to continue on with their defence.
As it now stands the transcripts will cost me $7,500.00 to purchase from the sole contractor to the Attorney General’s office in B.C. JCWord Assist Ltd. The amount of support and funding for this onerous and ridiculously unfair process of procuring the transcripts has been overwhelmingly positive and to date we have already raised over $7,000.00 toward this end. I am deeply appreciative and humbled by this generosity on the part of supporters world-wide who’ve found it in their hearts to help me out. The transcripts are vital to my defence and will prove extremely useful in the days ahead as this battle to retain our right to freedom of speech continues to unfold in the Supreme Court of Canada.
The transcripts though are not the only expenses that I face and therefore I am forced to continue to ask for financial assistance and will likely do so until the process wends its way to a final outcome. It’s for this reason that I must therefore append my donation ‘shingle’ to this Christmas greeting as well.
As the new year approaches I am filled with hope, strength and an unwavering determination to carry on with this fight until the odious sections of our legal system that make it a criminal act to speak one’s mind are defeated and repealed once and for all.
The world today stands at the brink of despair and hope. Never has there been a more urgent time in our history for the people to be able to stand up and speak out for their basic human rights in order to defend their nation against the incredibly powerful and deceptive actions of their respective governments and media; political bodies and complicit agencies who have shown themselves, over and over, to be working against the fundamental rights of the individual in order to broaden the scope of their control and propaganda now being forced upon the minds and hearts of people around the globe all at the behest of special interest groups who wield, altogether, untold amounts of unwarranted power and influence over nation states worldwide.
2016 bodes well in terms of providing the impetus to speak out and be heard. Let us pray that vigilance and discernment will be the watchwords in the days ahead and that we will retain our basic rights and continue to live freely and in peace and harmony with all of humanity.
May God bless the peacemakers and all who strive for justice and truth!
Arthur Topham
The Radical Press
Canada’s Radical News Network

{ Comments are closed }

When Truth Becomes ‘Anti-Semitic’: What World Famous People Say About Jews and Zionism

In a recent screed of January 10, 2009 (The ‘Oldest Hatred’ Lives, from Gaza to Florida ) outlining a list of relatively minor examples of anti-Jewish sentiment resulting from Israel’s current butchery of the defenseless Palestinians of Gaza, Canadian journalist Mark Steyn, one of Zionism’s key literary brokers for North America’s Jewish-owned media cartel, attempts to lay the blame for the growing public outrage on the doorstep of Palestine’s democratically elected government Hamas along with other Islamic extremists, Muslims and anyone, anywhere expressing ‘anti-Zionist’ sentiments.

After listing off his abbreviated litany of ‘anti-Semitic’ attacks upon various Jewish individuals and groups he writes, ‘Forget, for the moment, Gaza. Forget that the Palestinian people are the most comprehensively wrecked people on the face of the earth. For the past sixty years they have been entrusted to the care of the United Nations, the Arab League, the PLO, Hamas and the ‘global community’ — and the results are pretty much what you’d expect’ all the while conveniently leaving out of his deceptively narrative description the blatant historic fact that it was the newly-formed Israeli government itself who, via mendacity and sheer ill-will and bloody terror, drove the legal inhabitants of Palestine out of their homes and villages and into that hideous concentration camp we now know as Gaza.

This simplistic and transparent ploy by Steyn to high jack the legitimate concerns of people around the world via jingoist sophistry and twisted argument in favour of the worn canard of ‘anti-Semitism’ falls flat in the face of an abundance of gross images of mutilated, dead and dying Palestinian children, women and elderly, yet this doesn’t deter him in his vainglorious denial of the truth from continuing to ride his blood-steyned steed further into the fray of unabashed Zionist media propaganda, thrashing about with his sword of lies and brandishing his bullet-ridden ‘anti-Semite’ banner one flapping madly about in the righteous winds of vehement feelings of horror expressed by decent people around the planet incensed and ashamed that such despicable acts of cruel and wanton bloodshed could still be committed against the human family at the beginning of the 21 Century.

But let’s, as Steyn says, ‘forget Gaza’ ‘and instead ponder the reaction to Gaza in Scandinavia, France, the United Kingdom, Canada, and golly, even Florida. As the delegitimization of Israel has metastasized, we are assured that criticism of the Jewish state is not the same as anti-Semitism. We are further assured that anti-Zionism is not the same as anti-Semitism, which is a wee bit more of a stretch. Only Israel attracts an intellectually respectable movement querying its very existence.’

In a token of submission to the Zionist god of cunning and perfidy Steyn tries comparing Israel with the state of Pakistan as part of recent political machinations and Mossad false flag operations by the Zionist-controlled US government to vilify Pakistan before eventually attacking it as yet another rogue, ‘terrorist’ state. Of Pakistan, and with obvious intent to deflect attention from Israel, Steyn sardonically states, ‘I happen to think the creation of Pakistan was the greatest failure of post-war British imperial policy.’

Steyn’s culminating and rather crass attempt to convince his western readers that all who reject Zionism are in fact Jew-hating bigots, hypocrites and ‘anti-Semites’ is eventually steeped in a feeble flourish of anti-Muslim artistry, punctuated with an excerpt from the Syrian poet, Nizar Qabbani, suggesting that the people of Gaza are all ‘mad’. And why are they mad? Why because, as Steyn so lucidly tells us, they exhibit ‘the enthusiastic adoption of the same pathologies’ that mainstream Europe is now expressing in their ‘anti-Semitic’ attacks but of course the Palestinians are even ‘more deranged — and in the end’ their resistance to the phosphorus bombs and DU bullets of Israeli justice ‘will prove just as self-destructive.’

Such is the ethereal substance of the Zionist media’s #1 propaganda broker Mark Steyn. If you don’t approve of the butcher’s banquet that Israel and its pro-Zionist supporters around the world are feasting upon then by definition you are ‘anti-Semitic’ and a Jew-hater.

Which brings me now to the list of world famous people, who by Steyn’s and Zionism’s definition, fit the description of ‘anti-Semite’. It was one of these people listed, H.H. Beamish who, in a New York address in October 1937 made the following observation:

‘In 1848 the word ‘anti-Semitic’ was invented by the Jews to prevent the use of the word ‘Jew.’ The right word for them is ‘Jew’ …’

Like gemstones and special treats of food I would guess that almost everybody loves reading quotes. The ones that follow are the most comprehensive list related to the issue of ‘anti-Semitism’ that I am aware of. They are offered here to the internet community as one small token of respect for the inhumane suffering of the Palestinian people of all of Palestine and the Arab world in general. They are also dedicated to those brave truth-seeking men and women who now languish in German prisons because they had the fortitude, the fore-knowledge and the courage to question the Zionist Lie. God bless and keep them all safe from any further harm.

If readers of these quotes feel they are being wrongly accused by the likes of Mark Steyn and the Zionist warlords I am certain that by the time they complete reading them they will not feel alone in their gut reaction to what is going on in Gaza today.

‘In the beginning was the word and the word was that the Talmudic Jews were anathema to universal justice and peace for all non-Jewish peoples of the earth.‘
~ Arthur Topham, January 13, 2009

Famous Quotes by Famous People on Jews and Zionism

CICERO (Marcus Tullius Cicero). First century B.C. Roman stateman, writer.

‘Softly! Softly! I want none but the judges to hear me. The Jews have already gotten me into a fine mess, as they have many other gentleman. I have no desire to furnish further grist for their mills.’ (Oration in Defense of Flaccus)

Cicero was serving as defense counsel at the trial of Flaccus, a Roman official who interfered with Jewish gold shipments to their international headquarters (then, as now) in Jerusalem. Cicero himself certainly was not a nobody, and for one of this stature to have to ‘speak softly’ shows that he was in the presence of a dangerously powerful sphere of influence.

and on another occasion Cicero wrote:

‘The Jews belong to a dark and repulsive force. One knows how numerous this clique is, how they stick together and what power they exercise through their unions. They are a nation of rascals and deceivers.’

SENECA (Lucius Annaeus Seneca). First century Roman philosopher.

‘The customs of that most criminal nation have gained such strength that they have now been received in all lands. The conquered have given laws to the conquerors.’ (De Superstitione)

DIO CASSIUS. Second century Roman historian. Describing the savage Jewish uprising against the Roman empire that has been acknowledged as the turning point downward in the course of that great state-form:

‘The Jews were destroying both Greeks and Romans. They ate the flesh of their victims, made belts for themselves out of their entrails, and daubed themselves with their blood… In all, 220,000 men perished in Cyrene and 240,000 in Cyprus, and for this reason no Jew may set foot in Cyprus today.’ (Roman History)

DIODORUS SICULUS. First century Greek historian. Observed that Jews treated other people as enemies and inferiors.

‘Usury’ is the practice of lending money at excessive interest rates. This has for centuries caused great misery and poverty for Gentiles. It has brought strong condemnation of the Jews!

BERNARDINO OF FELTRO. 15th century Italian priest. A mild man who extolled patience and charity in normal circumstances, he described himself as a ‘barking dog’ when dealing with Jews:

‘Jewish usurers bleed the poor to death and grow fat on their substance, and I who live on alms, who feed on the bread of the poor, shall I then be mute before outraged charity? Dogs bark to protect those who feed them, and I, who am fed by the poor, shall I see them robbed of what belongs to them and keep silent?’ (E. Flornoy, Le Bienbeureux Bernardin the Feltre)

AQUINAS, THOMAS, Saint. 13th century scholastic philosopher. In his ‘On the Governance of the Jews,’ he wrote:

‘The Jews should not be allowed to keep what they have obtained from others by usury; it were best that they were compelled to work so that they could earn their living instead of doing nothing but becoming avaricious.’

HILAIRE BELLOC, in the book THE JEWS, page 9:

‘There is already something like a Jewish monopoly in high finance … There is the same element of Jewish monopoly in the silver trade, and in the control of various other metals, notably lead, nickel, quicksilver. What is most disquieting of all, this tendency to monopoly is spreading like a disease.’

H. H. BEAMISH, in New York Speech, October 30, 1937:

‘The Boer War occurred 37 years ago. Boer means farmer. Many criticized a great power like Britain for trying to wipe out the Boers. Upon making inquiry, I found all the gold and diamond mines of South Africa were owned by Jews; that Rothschild controlled gold; Samuels controlled silver, Baum controlled other mining, and Moses controlled base metals. Anything these people touch they inevitably pollute.’

W. HUGHES, Premier of Australia, Saturday Evening Post, June 19, 1919:

‘The Montefiores have taken Australia for their own, and there is not a gold field or a sheep run from Tasmania to New South Wales that does not pay them a heavy tribute. They are the real owners of the antipodean continent. What is the good of our being a wealthy nation, if the wealth is all in the hands of German Jews?’


‘All the world suffers from the usury of the Jews, their monopolies and deceit. They have brought many unfortunate people into a state of poverty, especially the farmers, working class people and the very poor.

Then as now Jews have to be reminded intermittently anew that they were enjoying rights in any country since they left Palestine and the Arabian desert, and subsequently their ethical and moral doctrines as well as their deeds rightly deserve to be exposed to criticism in whatever country they happen to live.’

NESTA WEBSTER, In World Revolution, The Plot against Civilization, page 163:

‘Since the earliest times it is as the exploiter that the Jew has been known amongst his fellow men of all races and creeds. Moreover, he has persistently shown himself ungrateful… The Jews have always formed a rebellious element in every state.’

FRANZ LISZT, famed composer quoted in Col. E. N. Sanctuary’s Are These Things So?, page 278:

‘The day will come when all nations amidst which the Jews are dwelling will have to raise the question of their wholesale expulsion, a question which will be one of life or death, good health or chronic disease, peaceful existence or perpetual social fever.’

JESUS CHRIST, speaking to the Jews in the Gospel of St. John, VIII:44:

‘Ye are of your father the devil, and the lust of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is not truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar and the father of it. then answered the Jews ’ (which makes it clear that Christ was addressing the Jews.)

MARTIN LUTHER, Table Talk of Martin Luther, translated by William Hazlett, Esq. page 43:

‘But the Jews are so hardened that they listen to nothing; though overcome by testimonies they yield not an inch. It is a pernicious race, oppressing all men by their usury and rapine. If they give a prince or magistrate a thousand florins, they extort twenty thousand from the subjects in payment. We must ever keep on guard against them.’

REV. GORDON WINROD, in his book The Keys to Christian Understanding, pages 114 115:

‘Judaism does not know Jesus Christ. Judaism hates Jesus Christ. When St. Paul was in Judaism, before he was converted to Christianity, he hated Jesus Christ and persecuted Christians and Christianity.’

Paul said: ‘You have heard of my earlier career in Judaism how furiously I persecuted the Church of God, and made havoc of it; and how in devotion to Judaism I out-stripped many men of my own age among my people, being far more zealous than they for the tradition of my forefathers.’ (Gal. 1:13, 14, Weymouth Translation)

While in Judaism, Paul persecuted Christians because of his intense hatred for Christians and because of his conformity to the tradition of the fathers. This shows that the tradition of teachings of Judaism are filled with hate for Christians.

Few people know of this because they do not carefully read their Scriptures and because of the great pains which Jews have take to deceive the Christians. Care has been exerted by the Jews to hide their ECONOMIC-POLITICAL conspiracy for complete world domination UNDER high sounding words that have a ‘RELIGIOUS’ ring in the ears of Christians.

The Jews use such ‘religious’ sounding words as ‘the Jewish faith,’ ‘the Jewish religion,’ ‘Jewish spiritual values,’ ‘Jewish religious doctrines,’ and like phrases which deceive and lead the unlearned into total equanimity.

Behind this mask of religiosity stands a complete plan for world government, world power, world conquest, a Jewish kingdom of this world, and the destruction of Christianity.

REV. WILLIAM S. MITCHELL of Philadelphia, quoted in Count Cherep-Spiridovich’s book The Secret World Government, page 194:

‘If there is an ingrate in history, it is the Jew. In this land which befriended him he as conspired, plotted, undermined, prostituted and corrupted and (hiding to this hour behind the braver screen of other folks), dares to contrive and scheme the death of every Christian principle which has protected him.’

ST. JUSTIN, martyr stated in 116 A. D.:

‘The Jews were behind all the persecutions of the Christians. They wandered through the country everywhere hating and undermining the Christian faith.’

ST. JOHN, Gospel of St. John VII:1:

‘After these things Jesus walked in Galilee: for he would not walk in Jewry because the Jews sought to kill him.’

M. H. DE HEEKELINGEN, in Israel: Son Passe, Son Avenir:

‘The former Rabbi Drach, converted to Catholicism, says that the Talmud contains ‘a large number of musing, utterly ridiculous extravagancies, most revolting indecencies, and, above all, the most horrible blasphemies against everything which the Christian religion holds most sacred and most dear.’

‘In the matter of the translation of the Talmud by non-Jews, we have always preferred that of Luzsensky, whose accuracy has been established by the Courts. In 1923, the Public Prosecutor of Hungary caused his Hungarian Talmud to be seized on account of ‘attack on public morals’ and ‘pornography.’ In delivering its verdict, the Court declared ‘INTER ALIA:

‘The horrors contained in the translation of Alfred Luzsensky are to be found, without exception, in the Talmud. His translation is correct, in that it renders these passages, which are actually to be found in the original text of the Talmud, after their true meaning.’


‘The Jews formed the breeding ground of all anti-Christian actions.’

REV. MARTIN LUTHER, sermon at Eisleben, a few days before his death, February, 1546:

‘Besides, you also have many Jews living in the country, who do much harm… You should know the Jews blaspheme and violate the name of our Savior day for day… for that reason you, Milords and men of authority, should not tolerate but expel them. They are our public enemies and incessantly blaspheme our Lord Jesus Christ, they call our Blessed Virgin Mary a harlot and her Holy Son a bastard and to us they give the epithet of changelings and abortions.

Therefore deal with them harshly as they do nothing but excruciatingly blaspheme our Lord Jesus Christ, trying to rob us of our lives, our health, our honor and belongings.’

MARIA THERESA, Queen of Hungary and Bohemia (1771 1789):

‘Henceforth no Jew, no matter under what name, will be allowed to remain here without my written permission. I know of no other troublesome pest within the state than this race, which impoverished the people by their fraud, usury and money-lending and commit all deeds which an honorable man despises. Subsequently they have to be removed and excluded from here as much as possible.’

(The Universal Jewish Encyclopedia states that ‘The Talmud is the real ‘bible’ of the Jews and that it supersedes the Old Testament. This volume has been condemned down through the ages for preaching hatred for Christ and all Christians. Read ‘THE TALMUD UNMASKED’ for the full shocking details.)

DIDEROT, DENIS. 18th century French scholar.

His famous ENCYCLOPEDIE, the bible of the pre-revolutionary French ‘enlightenment,’ has often been complained of by Jewish writers as ‘anti-Semitic.’ Some of Diderot’s other writings are likewise quite frank:

‘And you, angry and brutish people, vile and vulgar men, slaves worthy of the yoke [Talmudism] which you bear … Go, take back your books and remove yourselves from me. (LA MOISADE)

[The Talmud] taught the Jews to steal the goods of Christians, to regard them as savage beasts, to push them over the precipice … to kill them with impunity and to utter every morning the most horrible imprecations against them. (JUIFS)

NASTA WEBSTER, in Secret Societies and Subversive Movements, page 370:

‘The Jewish conception of the Jews as the Chosen People who must eventually rule the world forms indeed the basis of Rabbinical Judaism… The Jewish religion now takes its stand on the Talmud rather than on the Bible.’

F. TROCASE, in Jewish Austria:

‘No obstacle discourages them; they persevere throughout the world, throughout the centuries, the unity of their race. The Talmud has given them a powerful organization which modern progress has been unable to change. Deep, ineradicable hatred of everything that is not Jewish stimulates them in war which they wage against Christian Society, which is too divided to be able to fight with the necessary energy.’


‘The Jews form a state, and, obeying their own laws, they evade those of their host country. The Jews always consider an oath regarding a Christian not binding. During the Campaign of 1812 the Jews were spies, they were paid by both sides, they betrayed both sides.’

MOHAMMED, in the Koran:

‘Whoever is a friend of a Jew, belong to them, becomes one of them, God cannot tolerate this mean people. The Jews have wandered from divine religion. You must not relent in your work which must show up Jewish deceit.’

BACON, FRANCIS. 16th century British writer, politician.

In his The New Atlantis, he remarked that Jews,

‘hate the name of Christ and have a secret and innate rancor against the people among whom they live.’

He also disapproved of non-Jewish usurers as ‘Judaizers’ who would wear ‘tawny bonnets’ like Jews.

LUTHER, MARTIN. 16th century German religious reformer.

‘They are the real liars and bloodhounds, who have not only perverted and falsified the entire Scriptures from beginning to end and without ceasing with their interpretations. And all of the anxious sighing, longing and hoping of their hearts is directed to the time when some day they would like to deal with us heathen as they dealt with the heathen in Persia at the time of Esther… On how they love the book of Esther, which so nicely agrees with their bloodthirsty, revengeful and murderous desire and hope.

The sun never did shine on a more bloodthirsty and revengeful people as they, who imagine to be the people of God, and who desire to and think they must murder and crush the heathen. And the foremost undertaking which they expect of their Messiah is that he should slay and murder the whole world with the sword. As they at first demonstrated against us Christians and would like to do now, if they only could; have also tried it often and have been repeatedly struck on their snouts…

Their breath stinks for the gold and silver of the heathen; since no people under the sun always have been, still are, and always will remain more avaricious than they, as can be noticed in their cursed usury. They also find comfort with this: ‘When the Messiah comes, He shall take all the gold and silver in the world and distribute it among the Jews.

Thus, wherever they can direct Scripture to their insatiable avarice, they wickedly do so.

Therefore know, my dear Christians, that next to the Devil, you have no more bitter, more poisonous, more vehement an enemy than a real Jew who earnestly desires to be a Jew. There may be some among them who believe what the cow or the goose believes. But all of them are surrounded with their blood and circumcision. In history, therefore, they are often accused of poisoning wells, stealing children and mutilating them; as in Trent, Weszensee and the like. Of course they deny this. Be it so or not, however, I know full well that the ready will is not lacking with them if they could only transform it into deeds, in secret or openly.

A person who does not know the Devil, might wonder why they are so at enmity with the Christians above all others; for which they have no reason, since we only do good to them.

They live among us in our homes, under our protection, use land and highways, market and streets. Princes and government sit by, snore and have their maws open, let the Jews take from their purse and chest, steal and rob whatever they will. That is, they permit themselves and their subjects to be abused and sucked dry and reduced to beggars with their own money, through the usury of the Jews. For the Jews, as foreigners, certainly should have nothing from us; and what they have certainly must be ours. They do not work, do not earn anything from us, neither do we donate or give it to them. Yet they have our money and goods and are lords in our land where they are supposed to be in exile!

If a thief steals ten gulden he must hang; if he robs people on the highway, his head is gone. But a Jew, when he steals ten tons of gold through his usury is dearer than God himself!

Do not their TALMUD and rabbis write that it is no sin to kill if a Jew kills a heathen, but it is a sin if he kills a brother in Israel? It is no sin if he does not keep his oath to a heathen. Therefore, to steal and rob (as they do with their moneylending) from a heathen, is a divine service… And they are the masters of the world and we are their servants yea, their cattle!

I maintain that in three fables of Aesop there is more wisdom to be found than in all the books of the Talmudists and rabbis and more than ever could come into the hearts of the Jews…

Should someone think I am saying too much I am saying much too little! For I see in [their] writings how they curse us Goyim and wish us all evil in their schools and prayers. They rob us of our money through usury, and wherever they are able, they play us all manner of mean tricks… No heathen has done such things and none would to so except the Devil himself and those whom he possesses as he possesses the Jews.

Burgensis, who was a very learned rabbi among them and by the grace of God became a Christian (which seldom occurs), is much moved that in their schools they so horribly curse us Christians (as Lyra also writes) and from that draws the conclusion that they must not be the people of God.

Now behold what a nice, thick, fat lie it is when they complain about being captives among us! Jerusalem was destroyed more than 1,400 years ago during that time we Christians have been tortured and persecuted by the Jews in all the world. On top of that, we do not know to this day what Devil brought them into our country. We did not fetch them from Jerusalem!… Yes, we have and hold them captive, as I would like to keep my rheumatism, and all other diseases and misfortunes, who must wait as a poor servant, with money and property and everything I have! I wish they were in Jerusalem with the other Jews and whomsoever they would like to have with them.

Now what are we going to do with these rejected, condemned Jewish people?… Let us apply the ordinary wisdom of other nations like France, Spain, Bohemia, et al., who made them give an account of what they had stolen through usury, and divided it evenly; but expelled them from their country;. For as heard before, God’s wrath is so great over them that through soft mercy they only become more wicked, through hard treatment, however, only a little better. Therefore, away with them!

How much more unbearable it is that we should permit the entire Christendom and all of us to be bought with our own money, be slandered and cursed by the Jews, who on top of all that be made rich and our lords, who laugh us to scorn and are tickled by their audacity!

What a joyful affair that would be for the Devil and his angels, and cause them to laugh through their snouts like a sow grinning at her little pigs, but deserving real wrath before God. (From THE JEWS AND THEIR LIES)

Maybe mild-hearted and gentle Christians will believe that I am too rigorous and drastic against the poor, afflicted Jews, believing that I ridicule them and treat them with much sarcasm. By my word, I am far too weak to be able to ridicule such a satanic brood. I would fain to do so, but they are far greater adepts at mockery than I and possess a god who is master in this art. It is the Evil One himself.

Even with no further evidence than the Old Testament, I would maintain, and no person on earth could alter my opinion, that the Jews as they are today are veritably a mixture of all the depraved and malevolent knaves of the whole world over, who have then been dispersed in all countries, similarly to the Tartars, Gypsies and such folk.’

WASHINGTON, GEORGE, in Maxims of George Washington by A. A. Appleton & Co.

‘They (the Jews) work more effectively against us, than the enemy’s armies. They are a hundred times more dangerous to our liberties and the great cause we are engaged in… It is much to be lamented that each state, long ago, has not hunted them down as pest to society and the greatest enemies we have to the happiness of America.’

This prophecy, by Benjamin Franklin, was made in a ‘CHIT CHAT AROUND THE TABLE DURING INTERMISSION,’ at the Philadelphia Constitutional Convention of 1787. This statement was recorded in the dairy of Charles Cotesworth Pinckney, a delegate from South Carolina.

‘I fully agree with General Washington, that we must protect this young nation from an insidious influence and impenetration. The menace, gentlemen, is the Jews.

In whatever country Jews have settled in any great number, they have lowered its moral tone; depreciated its commercial integrity; have segregated themselves and have not been assimilated; have sneered at and tried to undermine the Christian religion upon which that nation is founded, by objecting to its restrictions; have built up a state within the state; and when opposed have tried to strangle that country to death financially, as in the case of Spain and Portugal.

For over 1,700 years, the Jews have been bewailing their sad fate in that they have been exiled from their homeland, as they call Palestine. But gentlemen, did the world give it to them in fee simple, they would at once find some reason for not returning. Why? Because they are vampires, and vampires do not live on vampires. They cannot live only among themselves. They must subsist on Christians and other people not of their race.

If you do not exclude them from these United States, in their Constitution, in less than 200 years they will have swarmed here in such great numbers that they will dominate and devour the land and change our form of government, for which we Americans have shed our blood, given our lives our substance and jeopardized our liberty.

If you do not exclude them, in less than 200 years our descendants will be working in the fields to furnish them substance, while they will be in the counting houses rubbing their hands. I warn you, gentlemen, if you do not exclude Jews for all time, your children will curse you in your graves.

Jews, gentlemen, are Asiatics, let them be born where they will nor how many generations they are away from Asia, they will never be otherwise. Their ideas do not conform to an American’s, and will not even though they live among us ten generations. A leopard cannot change its spots. Jews are Asiatics, are a menace to this country if permitted entrance, and should be excluded by this Constitutional Convention.

STYVESANT, PETER. 17th century Dutch governor in America.

‘The Jews who have arrived would nearly all like to remain here, but learning that they (with their customary usury and deceitful trading with the Christians) were very repugnant to the inferior magistrates, as also to the people having the most affection for you; the Deaconry also fearing that owing to their present indigence they might become a charge in the coming winter, we have, for the benefit of this weak newly developing place and land in general, deemed it useful to require them in a friendly way to depart; praying also most seriously in this connection, for ourselves also for the general community of your worships, that the deceitful race such hateful enemies and blasphemers of the name of Christ not be allowed further to infect and trouble this new colony. (Letter to the Amsterdam Chamber of the Dutch West India Company, from New Amsterdam, September 22, 1654.)

The Jews whom he attempted to oust merely applied to their fellow Jews in Holland, and the order came back from the Company countermanding the expulsion. (For a similar situation during the Civil War, see ULYSSES GRANT). Among the reasons given by ‘their worships’ for over-ruling their governor, one stands out rather glaringly, in view of the usual Jewish contention that their people were ‘poor and persecuted:’ ’ …and also because of the large amount of capital which they have invested in shares of this Company.’ (Harry Golden and Martin Rywell, THE JEWS IN AMERICAN HISTORY )

THE GEORGIA COLONY IN AMERICA. On January 5, 1734, the trustees ordered that three Jews who had been sending coreligionists into the colony without authorization ‘use their endeavors that the said Jews may be removed from the Colony of Georgia, as the best and only satisfaction that they can give to the Trustees for such an indignity offered to Gentlemen acting under His Majesty’s Charter.’ (C. Jones, HISTORY OF SAVANNAH)

JEFFERSON, THOMAS. 18th century American statesman.

‘Dispersed as the Jews are, they still form one nation, foreign to the land they live in. ’ (D. Boorstin, THE AMERICANS)

‘Those who labor in the earth are the Chosen People of God, if ever he had a chosen people. ’ (NOTES ON VIRGINIA)

BEAMISH, HENRY H. 20th century British publisher.

‘There is no need to be delicate on this Jewish question. You must face them in this country. The Jew should be satisfied here. I was here forty-seven years ago; your doors were thrown open and you were then free. Now he has got you absolutely by the throat that is their reward. ’ (New York speech, October 30, 1937)

HARRINGTON, LORD. 19th century British statesman.

Opposed admission of Jewish immigrants to England because:

‘They are the great moneylenders and loan contractors of the world… The consequence is that the nations of the world are groaning under heavy systems of taxation and national debt. They have ever been the greatest enemies of freedom. (Speech in the House of Lords, July 12, 1858)

WALTER CRICK, British Manufacturer, in the NORTHAMPTON DAILY ECHO, March 19. 1925:

‘Jews can destroy by means of finance. Jews are International. Control of credits in this country is not in the hands of the English, but of Jews. It has become the biggest danger the British Empire ever had to face.’

WORLD FAMOUS MEN of the past accused the Jews of founding Communism. This charge is well founded. The Communist philosopy was drawn up by Karl Marx who descended from a long line of Rabbis. His ideology of anti-Christian and Socialist thought is outlined in the Jewish ‘TALMUD’ which is the ‘bible’ of the Jews. Of the four political groups which overthrew the Christan Czar of Russia two were 100% Jewish. They were the Mensheviks and The Jewish Bund. The other two were the Socialist Revolutionary Party and the Bolsheviks. Both were headed by Jews but had some Gentile members. Today we now know that Lenin was Jewish and all of the leaders of his first government were Jews. They were Trotsky, Zinoviev, Kamenev and Sverdlow. The wealthiest Jewish banker in the world at that time, Jacob Schiff of Kuhn, Loeb investment bank of New York City, gave Trotsky and Lenin $20 million to overthrow the Czar and establish the Soviet tyranny (according to the ‘NEW YORK JOURNAL-AMERICAN’ of February 3, 1949.)

CHURCHILL, WINSTON. 20th century British politician.

In 1920, he wrote a long newspaper article of the recent Bolshevik seizure of Russia. After praising what he called the ‘national Jews’ of Russia, he said:

‘In violent opposition to all this sphere of Jewish efforts rise the schemes of the International Jews. The adherents of this sinister confederacy are mostly men reared up among the unhappy populations of countries where Jews are persecuted on account of their race. Most, if not all, of them have forsaken the faith of their forefathers, and divorced from their minds all spiritual hopes of the next world. This movement among the Jews is not new. From the days of Spartacus-Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun (Hungary), Rosa Luxemburg (Germany), and Emma Goldman (United States), this world-wide revolutionary conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily growing. It played, as a modern writer, Mrs. Webster has ably shown, a definite recognizable part in the tragedy of the French Revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the Nineteenth Century; and now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworlds of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads and have become practically the undisputed masters of the enormous empire.

There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creating of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international and for the most part atheistic Jews. It is certainly the very great one; it probably outweighs all others. With the notable exception of Lenin, [now questionably of Jewish origin too. Ed.] the majority of the leading figures are Jews. Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power comes from the Jewish leaders… In the Soviet institutions the predominance of Jews is even more astounding. And the prominent if not the principal part in the system of terrorism applied by the extraordinary Commissions for combating Counter Revolution has been take by Jews, and in some notable cases by Jewesses. The same evil prominence was obtained by Jews in the brief period of terror during which Bela Kun ruled in Hungary. The same phenomenon has been presented in Germany (especially Bavaria), so far as this madness has been allowed to prey upon the temporary prostration of the German people. Although in all these countries there are many nonJews every whit as bad as the worst of the Jewish revolutionaries, the part played by the latter in proportion to their numbers in the population is astonishing. (’Zionism versus Bolshevism: A Struggle for the Soul of the Jewish People.’ ILLUSTRATED SUNDAY HERALD, London, February 8, 1920.)

BAKUNIN, MIKHAIL. 19th century Russian revolutionary.

‘Marx is a Jew and is surrounded by a crowd of little, more or less intelligent, scheming, agile, speculating Jews, just as Jews are everywhere, commercial and banking agents, writers, politicians, correspondents for newspapers of all shades; in short, literary brokers, just as they are financial brokers, with one foot in the bank and the other in the socialist movement, and their arses sitting upon the German press. They have grabbed hold of all newspapers, and you can imagine what a nauseating literature is the outcome of it.

Now this entire Jewish world, which constitutes an exploiting sect, a people of leeches, a voracious parasite, Marx feels an instinctive inclination and a great respect for the Rothschilds. This may seem strange. What could there be in common between communism and high finance? Ho ho! The communism of Marx seeks a strong state centralization, and where this exists there must inevitably exist a state central bank, and where this exists, there the parasitic Jewish nation, which speculates upon the labor of the people, will always find the means for its existence…

In reality, this would be for the proletariat a barrack regime, under which the workingmen and the working closely and intimately connected with one another, regardless not only of frontiers but of political differences as well this Jewish world is today largely at the disposal of Marx or Rothschild. I am sure that, on the one hand, the Rothschilds appreciate the merits of Marx, and that on the other hand, women, converted into a uniform mass, would rise, fall asleep, work and live at the beat of the drum; the privilege of ruling would be in the hands of the skilled and the learned, with a wide scope left for profitable crooked deals carried on by the Jews, who would be attracted by the enormous extension of the international speculations of the national banks…’

This startling piece of prediction is particularly impressive to those who have observed the Soviet scene and notice its strange relationship with capitalist financiers overwhelmingly Jewish since the revolution. The line runs from Olof Aschberg, self-described ‘Bolshevik banker’ who ferried to Trotsky the huge sums raised for the revolution by financiers in Europe and America, to Armand Hammer in the 1970s, who has specialized in multimillion-dollar trade concessions with the now supposedly ‘anti-Semitic’ commissars.

WILHELM II. German Kaiser.

‘A Jew cannot be a true patriot. He is something different, like a bad insect. He must be kept apart, out of a place where he can do mischief even by pogroms, if necessary.

The Jews are responsible for Bolshevism in Russia, and Germany too. I was far too indulgent with them during my reign, and I bitterly regret the favors I showed the prominent Jewish bankers.’ (CHICAGO TRIBUNE, July 2, 1922)

CARDINAL MINDSZENTY, of Hungary quoted in B’nai B’rith Messenger, January 28, 1949

‘The troublemakers in Hungary are the Jews… they demoralize our country and they are the leaders of the revolutionary gang that is torturing Hungary.’

ADRIEN ARCAND, Canadian political leader New York speech, October 30, 1937:

‘When it came to Mexico, the promoters of Communism were the Jews Calles, Hubermann and Aaron Saenz; in Spain we saw Azaa and Rosenberg; in Hungary we saw Bela Kun, Szamuelly, Agoston and dozen other Jews; in Bavaria, we saw Kurt Eisner and a host of other Jews; in Belgium Marxian Socialism brought to power Vadervelde alias Epstein, and Paul Hymans, two Jews; in France, Marxian Socialism brought forth the Jews Leon Blum (who showed so well his Jewish instincts in his filthy book Du Mariarge), Mandel, Zyromsky, Danain and a whole tribe of them; in Italy we had seen the Jews Nathan and Claudio Treves. Everywhere, Marxism brings Jews on the top And this is no hazard.’

HILAIRE BELLOC, renown historian in G. K.’s WEEKLY, February 4, 1937:

‘The propaganda of Communism throughout the world, in organization and direction is in the hands of Jewish agents. As for anyone who does not know that the Bolshevist movement in Russia is Jewish, I can only say that he must be a man who is taken in by the suppression of our deplorable press.’

A. HOMER, writes in Judaism and Bolshevism, page 7:

‘History shows that the Jew has always been, by nature, a revolutionary and that, since the dispersion of his race in the second century, he has either initiated or assisted revolutionary movements in religion, politics and finance, which weakened the power of the States wherein he dwelt. On the other hand, a few far-seeing members of that race have always been at hand to reap financial and political advantage coincident with such upheavals.’

CAPTAIN MONTGOMERY SCHYLER, American Expeditionary Forces, Siberia, in a military intelligence report dated March 1, 1919, to Lt. Col. Barrows in Vladivostok:

‘It is probably unwise to say this loudly in the United States but the Bolshevik movement is and has been since its beginning guided and controlled by Russian Jews of the greasiest type, who have been in the United States and there absorbed every one of the worst phases of our civilization without having the least understanding of what we really mean by liberty.’

MRS. CLARE SHERIDAN, Traveler, Lecturer in NEW YORK WORLD, December 15, 1923:

‘The Communists are Jews, and Russia is being entirely administered by them. They are in every government office, bureau and newspaper. They are driving out the Russians and are responsible for the anti-Semitic feeling which is increasing.’

MAJOR ROBERT H. WILLIAMS, in Fecp and the Minority Machine, page 10:

‘B’nai B’rith, the secret Jewish fraternity, was organized in 1843, awakening world Jewish aspirations, or Zionism, and its name, meaning ‘Sons of the Covenant,’ suggests that the 12 men who organized the fraternity aimed at bringing about the fulfillment of ‘the Covenant,’ or the supposed Messianic promise of rulership over all peoples. To rule all peoples, it is first necessary to bring them together in a world federation or world government which is the avowed aim of both Communists and Zionists.’

VLADIMIR, LENIN, Founder of Bolshevik Communist (From an article in Northern Pravda, October-December 1913, qouted in Lenin on the Jewish Question, page 10):

‘There the great universally progressive features of Jewish culture have made themselves clearly felt: its internationalism, its responsiveness of the advanced movements of our times (the percentage of Jews in democratic and proletarian movements is everywhere higher than the percentage of Jews in the general population.)

…Those Jewish Marxists who join up in the international Marxist organizations with the Russian, Lithuanian, Ukrainian and other workers, adding their might (both in Russian and in Jewish) to the creation of an international culture of the working class movement, are continuing the best traditions of Jewry.’

JOSEPH STALIN in a reply given on January 12, 1931 to an enquiry made by the Jewish Telegraphic Agency of America (Stars and Sand, page 316):

‘Anti-Semitism is dangerous for the toilers, for it is a false track which diverts them from the proper road and leads them into the jungle. Hence, Communists, as consistent internationalists, cannot but be irreconcilable and bitter enemies of anti-Semitism. In the U.S.S.R., anti-Semitism is strictly prosecuted as a phenomenon hostile to the Soviet system. According to the laws of the U.S.S.R. active anti-Semites are punished with death.’

HENRY FORD in (The Dearborn Independent, 12-19 February 1921:

‘Jews have always controlled the business… The motion picture influence of the United States and Canada… is exclusively under the control, moral and financial, of the Jewish manipulators of the public mind.’

M. OUDENDYK, the Netherlands’ Minister to Petrograd on September 6, 1918, to the British Government, published in the unexpurgated edition of A Collection of Reports on Bolshevism in Russia, April, 1919:

‘…I consider that the immediate suppression of Bolshevism is the greatest issue before the World, not even excluding the war which is still raging, and unless, as above stated, Bolshevism is nipped in the bud immediately, it is bound to spread in one form or another over Europe and the whole World, as it is organized and worked by Jews who have no nationality, and whose one object is to destroy for their own ends the existing order of things.’

A. N. FIELD, in Today’s Greatest Problem:

‘Once the Jewishness of Bolshevism is understood, its otherwise puzzling features become understandable. Hatred of Christianity, for instance, is not a Russian characteristic; it is a Jewish one.’

FATHER DENIS FAHEY; in his book The Rulers of Russia, page 25:

‘The real forces behind Bolshevism is Russia are Jewish forces, and Bolshevism is really an instrument in the hands of the Jews for the establishment of their future Messianic kingdom.’

A. N. FIELD, The Truth About the Slump, page 208:

‘The World today, however provides a spectacle of a great concentration of Jewish power. In New York there is a concentration of Jewish financial power dominating the entire world in its material affairs, and side by side with it is the greates physical concentration of the Jews ever recorded. On the other side of the globe, there has taken place in Russia the greatest concentration of the Jewish revolutionary activity in all history…

The enormously significant thing in the world today is that both this power of the purse (Theodor Herzl’s ‘terrible (Jewish) power of the purse’) and revolutionary activity are working in the direction of destroying the entire existing order of things, and not only are they working in a common direction, but there is a mass of evidence that they are working in unison.’

H. H. BEAMISH, N.Y. speech, 1937:

‘Communism is Judaism. The Jewish Revolution in Russia was in 1918.’

HILARY COTTER, author of Cardinal Minszenty, The Truth About His Real ‘Crime’ page 6:

‘Communism and Judaism are one and the same.’

ADRIEN ARCAND, Canadian political leader in New York Speech, October 30, 1937:

‘There is nothing else in Communism a Jewish conspiracy to grab the whole world in their clutches; and no intelligent man in the world can find anything else, except the Jews, who rightly call it for themselves a ‘paradise on earth.’

Jews are eager to bring Communism, because they know what it is and what it means.

It is because Communism has not been fought for what it really is a Jewish scheme invented by Jews that it has progressed against all opposition to it. We have fought the smoke-screen presented by Jewish dialecticians and publicists, refusing to fight the inventor, profiteer and string-puller. Because Christians and Gentiles have come to fear the Jews, fear the truth, and they are paralyzed by the paradoxical slogans shouted by the Jews.’


‘The Frankenstein of Communism is the product of the Jewish mind, and was turned loose upon the world by the son of a Rabbi, Karl Marx, in the hopes of destroying Christian civilization as well as others. The testimony given before the Senate of the United States which is take from the many pages of the Overman Report, reveals beyond a shadow of a doubt that Jewish bankers financed the Russian Revolution.’


SYLVESTER I. Condemned Jewish anti-Christian activity.

GREGORY I (’The Great’). Protested wholesale circumcision of Christian slaves by Jewish traders, who monopolized the slave trade in Europe and the Middle East and were widely suspected of supplying white girls to Oriental and African buyers.

GREGORY VIII. Forbade Jews to have power over Christians, in a letter to Alfonso VI of Castile.

GREGORY IX. Condemned the TALMUD as containing ‘every kind of vileness and blasphemy against Christian doctrine.’

BENEDICT XIII. His Bull on the Jewish issue (1450) declared:

‘The heresies, vanities and errors of the TALMUD prevent their knowing the truth.’

JULIUS III. Contra Hebreos retinentes libros (1554) ordered the TALMUD burned ‘everywhere’ and established a strict censorship over Jewish genocidal writings an order that has never been rescinded and which presumably is still binding upon Catholics.

PAUL IV. Cum nimis absurdim (1555) promulgated immediately after his coronation, was a powerful condemnation of Jewish usury. It embodies a model legal code to curb Jewish power that was recommended to all communities.

PIUS IV. Condemned Jewish genocidal writings.

PIUS V. Hebraeorum gens (1569) expelled all Jews from the Papal States.

GREGORY XIII. Declared that Jews,

‘continue to plot horrible crimes’ against Christians ‘with daily increasing audacity.’

CLEMENT VIII. Condemned Jewish genocidal writings.

ALEXANDER VIII. Condemned Jewish genocidal writings.

BENEDICT XIV. Quo Primum (1751) denounced Jewish control of commerce and ‘systematical despoliation’ of the Christian through usury.

PIUS VII. Known generally as an ‘anti-Semite’ by Jewish writers.

BENEDICT XV. Warned, in 1920, against,

‘the advent of a Universal Republic which is longed for by all the worst elements of disorder.’

This is resented by some Jews because of their active sponsorship and direction of such projects as the League of Nations and United Nations. And in effect, all Popes who have issued editions of the Index Expurgatorius, in which Jewish genocidal and anti-Christian writings are condemned, according to the instructions of the Council of Trent.

GRANT, USYSSES S. 19th century American general, politician.

While in command of the 13th Army Corps, headquartered at Oxford, Mississippi, he became so infuriated at Jewish camp-followers attempting to penetrate the conquered territory that he finally attempted to expel the Jews:

‘I have long since believed that in spite of all the vigilance that can be infused into post commanders, the special regulations of the Treasury Department have been violated, and that mostly by Jews and other unprincipled traders. So well satisfied have I been of this that I instructed the commanding officers at Columbus to refuse all permits to Jews to come South, and I have frequently had them expelled from the department, but they come in with their carpet-sacks in spite of all that can be done to prevent it. The Jews seem to be a privileged class that can travel anywhere. They will land at any woodyard on the river and make their way through the country. If not permitted to buy cotton themselves, they will act as agents for someone else, who will be at a military post with a Treasury permit to receive cotton and pay for it in Treasury notes which the Jew will buy up at an agreed rate, paying gold.’ (Letters to C. P. Wolcott, assistant secretary of war, Washington, December 17, 1862)

1. The Jews, as a class, violating every regulation of trade established by the Treasury Department, and also Department orders, are hereby expelled from the Department.
2. Within twenty-four hours from the receipt of this order by Post Commanders, they will see that all of this class of people are furnished with passes and required to leave, and anyone returning after such notification, will be arrested and held in confinement until an opportunity occurs of sending them out as prisoners, unless furnished with permits from these headquarters.
3. No permits will be given these people to visit headquarters for the purpose of making personal application for trade permits.

By order of Major Gen. Grant Jno. A. Rawlings, Assistant Adjutant General (General Order Number 11, December 17, 1862)

The expulsion order was immediately countermanded by the general-in-chief, H. W. Halleck, in Washington. Apparently the expelled Jews had immediately contacted their kinsmen there and had pressure brought to bear.

SHERMAN, WILLIAM T. 19th century American soldier.

In a letter from Union-occupied Memphis, July 30, 1862, he wrote:

‘I found so many Jews and speculators here trading in cotton, and secessionists had become so open in refusing anything but gold, that I have felt myself bound to stop it. The gold can have but one use the purchase of arms and ammunition… Of course, I have respected all permits by yourself or the Secretary of the Treasury, but in these new cases (swarms of Jews), I have stopped it.’ (The Sherman Letters)

ROSS, L. F. 19th century American military man.

As did Generals ULYSSES S. GRANT and WILLIAM T. SHERMAN, Ross confronted Jewish ‘carpetbagging’ cotton traders preying upon captured Confederate areas during the Civil War. In a letter to General John A. McClernand, he wrote:

‘The cotton speculators are quite clamorous for aid in the getting their cotton away from Middleburg, Hickory Valley, etc., and offer to pay liberally for the service. I think I can bring it away with safety, and make it pay to the Government. As some of the Jew owners have as good as stolen the cotton from the planters, I have no conscientious scruples in making them pay liberally to take it away.’

OLMSTED, GREDERICK LAW. 19th century American architect, historian.

‘A swarm of Jews has, within the last ten years, settled in every Southern town, many of them men of no character, opening cheap clothing and trinket shops, ruining or driving out of business many of the old retailers, and engaging in an unlawful trade with the simple Negroes, which is found very profitable. (The Cotton Kingdom. For other views on Jewish involvement in exploiting the South, see ULYSSES S. GRANT and MARK TWAIN.)

TWAIN, MARK (S. L. Clemens). 19th century American writer.

‘In the U.S. cotton states, after the war… the Jew came down in force, set up shop on the plantation, supplied all the Negroes’ wants on credit, and at the end of the season was the proprietor of the Negro’s share of the present crop and part of the next one. Before long, the whites detested the Jew.
The Jew is being legislated out of Russia. The reason is not concealed. The movement was instituted because the Christian peasant stood no chance against his commercial abilities. The Jew was always ready to lend on a crop. When settlement day came, he owned the crop; the next year he owned the farm like Joseph.

In the England of John’s time everybody got into debt to the Jew. He gathered all lucrative enterprises into his hands. He was the King of Commerce. He had to be banished from the realm. For like reasons, Spain had to banish him 400 years ago, and Austria a couple of centuries later.

In all ages Christian Europe has been obliged to curtail his activities. If he entered upon a trade, the Christian had to retire from it. If he set up as a doctor, he took the business. If he exploited agriculture, the other farmers had to get at something else. The law had to step in to save the Christian from the poor-house. Still, almost bereft of employments, he found ways to make money. Even to get rich. This history has a most sordid and practical commercial look. Religious prejudices may account for one part of it, bit not for the other nine.

Protestants have persecuted Catholics but they did not take their livelihoods away from them. Catholics have persecuted Protestants but they never closed agriculture and the handicrafts against them. I feel convinced that the Crucifixion has not much to do with the world’s attitude toward the Jew; that the reasons for it are much older than that event …

I am convinced that the persecution of the Jew is not in any large degree due to religious prejudice. No, the Jew is a money-getter. He made it the end and aim of his life. He was at it in Rome. He has been at it ever since. His success has made the whole human race his enemy.

You will say that the Jew is everywhere numerically feeble. When I read in the Cyclopedia Britannica that the Jewish population in the United States was 250,000 I wrote the editor and explained to him that I was personally acquainted with more Jews than that, and that his figures were without doubt a misprint for 25,000,000. People told me that they had reasons to suspect that for business reasons, many Jews did not report themselves as Jews. It looks plausible. I am strongly of the opinion that we have an immense Jewish population in America. I am assured by men competent to speak that the Jews are exceedingly active in politics.’ (’Concerning the Jews,’ Harper’s Monthly Magazine, September 1899)

Twain’s opinion on the Jews is probably the best-kept secret in American literary history. Immediately after his death, his eccentric daughter Clara married or was married by the Jewish piano player, Ossip Galbrilowitsch. Twain’s publishers were given speedy instructions to delete ‘Concerning the Jews’ from the collected works, where it had appeared in the book The Man that Corrupted Hadleybury & Other Stories. (1) Since Jews provided most of the agitators and orators who pushed forward the Abolition campaign that culminated in the Civil War (which Jewish bankers largely financed, on both sides), it seems a legitimate question whether there was any pre-planning for the wholesale and retail economic looting done by mainly Jewish carpetbaggers after the war. (2) We have cited a host of other writers on the terrible economic depredation that Jewry visited on the people of Tzarist Russia.

ERNEST RENAN, French historian:

‘The Jews are not merely a different religious community, but and this is the most important factor ethnically an altogether different race. The European felt instinctively that the Jew is a stranger, who immigrated from Asia. The so-called prejudice is natural sentiment. Civilization will overcome antipathy against the Israelite who merely professes another religion, but never against the racially different Jew…

In Eastern Europe the Jew is the cancer slowly eating into the flesh of other nations. Exploitation of the people is his only aim. Selfishness and a lack of personal courage are his chief characteristics; self-sacrifice and patriotism are altogether foreign to him.’

GOLDWIN SMITH, Professor of Modern History at Oxford, wrote in Nineteenth Century, October 1881:

‘The Jew alone regard his race as superior to humanity, and looks forward not to its ultimate union with other races, but to its triumph over them all and to its final ascendancy under the leadership of a tribal Messiah.’

MENCKEN, H. L. 20th century American writer.

‘The Jews could be put down very plausibly as the most unpleasant race ever heard of. As commonly encountered they lack any of the qualities that mark the civilized man: courage, dignity, incorruptibility, ease, confidence. They have vanity without pride, voluptuousness without taste, and learning without wisdom. Their fortitude, such as it is, is wasted upon puerile objects, and their charity is mainly a form of display.’ (Treatise on the Gods)

The fact that what are commonly spoken of as rights are often really privileges is demonstrated in the case of the Jews. They resent bitterly their exclusion from certain hotels, resorts and other places of gathering, and make determined efforts to horn in. But the moment any considerable number of them horns in, the attractions of the place diminish, and the more pushful Jews turn to one where they are still nicht gewuenscht … (’not wanted.’)

‘I am one of the few Goyim who have ever actually tackled the TALMUD. I suppose you now expect me to add that it is a profound and noble work, worthy of hard study by all other GOYIM. Unhappily, my report must differ from this expectation. It seems to me, save for a few bright spots, to be quite indistinguishable from rubbish…’

‘The Jewish theory that the GOYIM envy the superior ability of the Jews is not borne out by the facts. Most GOYIM, in fact, deny that the Jew is superior, and point in evidence to his failure to take the first prizes: he has to be content with the seconds. No Jewish composer has ever come within miles of Bach, Beethoven and Brahms; no Jew has ever challenged the top-flight painters of the world, and no Jewish scientist has equaled Newton, Darwin, Pasteur or Mendel. In the latter bracket such apparent exceptions as Ehrlich, Freud and Einstein are only apparent. Ehrlich, in fact, contributed less to biochemical fact than to biochemical theory, and most of his theory was dubious. Freud was nine-tenths quack, and there is sound reason for believing that even Einstein will not hold up: in the long run his curved space may be classed with the psychosomatic bumps of Gall and Spurzheim. But whether this inferiority of the Jew is real or only a delusion, it must be manifest that it is generally accepted. The GOY does not, in fact, believe that the Jew is better than the non-Jew; the most he will admit is that the Jew is smarter at achieving worldly success. But this he ascribes to sharp practices, not to superior ability.’ (Minority Report: H. L. Mencken’s Notebooks)

SHAW, GEORGE BERNARD. 20th century British dramatist.

‘This is the real enemy, the invader from the East, the Druze, the ruffian, the oriental parasite; in a word: the Jew. (London Morning Post, December 3, 1925)

This craving for bouquets by Jews is a symptom of racial degeneration. The Jews are worse than my own people. Those Jews who still want to be the chosen race (chosen by the late Lord Balfour) can go to Palestine and stew in their own juice. The rest had better stop being Jews and start being human beings. (Literary Digest, October 12, 1932)

WAGNER, RICHARD. 19th century German composer.

‘The Jew has never had an art of his own, hence never a life of art-enabling import… ‘So long as the separate art of music had a real organic life-need in it, down to the epochs of Mozart and Beethoven, there was nowhere to be found a Jew composer: it was utterly impossible for an element quiet foreign to that living organism to take a part in the formative stages of that life. Only when a body’s inner death is manifest, do outside elements win the power of judgment in it yet merely to destroy it.

On one thing am I clear: that is the influence which the Jews have gained upon our mental life, as displayed in the deflection and falsification of our highest culture-tendencies. Whether the downfall of our culture can be arrested by a violent rejection of the destructive alien element, I an unable to decide, since that would require forces with whose existence I am unacquainted. (Judaism in Music)

SOMBART, WERNER. 20th century German economist.

‘Capitalism was born from the money loan. Money lending contains the root idea of capitalism. Turn to the pages of the TALMUD and you will find that the Jews made an art of lending money. They were taught early to look for their chief happiness in the possession of money. They fathomed all the secrets that lay hid in money. They became Lords of Money and Lords of the World…

FITZGERALD, F. SCOTT. 20th century American novelist.

‘Down a tall busy street he read a dozen Jewish names on a line of stores; in the door of each stood a dark little man watching the passers from intent eyes eyes gleaming with suspicion, with pride, with clarity, with cupidity, with comprehension. New York he could not dissociate it from the slow, upward creep of this people the little stores, growing, expanding, consolidating, moving, watched over with hawks’ eyes and a bee’s attention to detail they [were Jews.]

EMERSON, RALPH WALDO. 19th century American philosopher, poet.

‘The sufferance which is the badge of the Jew has made him, in these days, the ruler of the rulers of the earth. (Fate an essay)

BURTON, SIR RICHARD FRANCIS. 19th century British diplomat, writer.

After a sting as consul at Damascus, Syria, where some years before, a Catholic priest was allegedly murdered in a blood ritual by Jews, Burton took an interest in the matter. His investigations satisfied him that such killings actually were performed by certain sects of Jews.

‘The Jew’s hand was ever, like Ishmael’s, against every man but those belonging to the Synagogue. His fierce passions and fiendish cunning, combined with abnormal powers of intellect, with intense vitality, and with a persistency of purpose which the world has rarely seen, and whetted moreover by a keen thirst for blood engendered by defeat and subjection, combined to make him the deadly enemy of all mankind, whilst his unsocial and iniquitous Oral Law [the TALMUD, ed.] contributed to inflame his wild lust of self, and to justify the crimes suggested by spite and superstition.’

DREISER, THEODORE. 20th century American writer.

‘New York to me is a scream a Kyke’s dream of a ghetto. The Lost Tribe has taken the island. (Letter to H. L. Mencken, November 5, 1922) ’

‘Liberalism, in the case of the Jew, means internationalism. If you listen to Jews discuss Jews, you will find they are money-minded, very sharp in practice. The Jews lack the fine integrity which at last is endorsed, and to a certain degree followed, by lawyers of other nationalities. The Jew has been in Germany for a thousand years, and he is still a Jew. He has been in America for all of 200 years, and he has not faded into a pure American by any means and he will not. (Letter to Hutchins Hapgood, The Nation magazine, April 17, 1935)’

WELLS, H. G. 20th century British writer.

‘The Jews looked for a special savior, a messiah, who was to redeem mankind by the agreeable process of restoring the fabulous glories of David and Solomon, and bringing the whole world at last under the firm but benevolent Jewish heel.’ (The Outline of History)

‘Zionism is an expression of Jewish refusal to assimilate. If the Jews have suffered, it is because they have regarded themselves as a chosen people.’ (The Anatomy of Frustration)

‘A careful study of anti-Semitism prejudice and accusations might be of great value to many Jews, who do not adequately realize the irritations they inflict.’ (Letter of November 11, 1933)

Wells was in the habit of referring to KARL MARX as ‘a shallow third-rate Jew,’ and ‘a lousy Jew’ in private correspondence. (Norman MacKenzie, H. G. Wells)

LINDBERGH, CHARLES. 20th century American aviator, writer.

Wednesday, August 23, 1939:

‘We are disturbed about the effect of the Jewish influence in our press, radio and motion pictures. It may become very serious. [Fulton] Lewis told us of one instance where the Jewish advertising firms threatened to remove all their advertising from the Mutual system if a certain feature were permitted to go on the air. The threat was powerful enough to have the feature removed.’

Thursday, May 1, 1941

‘The pressure for war is high and mounting. The people are opposed to it, but the Administration seems to have ‘the bit in its teeth’ and is hell-bent on its way to war. Most of the Jewish interests in the country are behind war, and they control a huge part of our press and radio and most of our motion pictures. There are the ‘intellectuals’ and the ‘Anglophiles,’ and the British agents who are allowed free rein, the international financial interests, and many others.’ (The Wartime Journals)

GENERAL GEORGE VAN HORN MOSELY, in the New York Tribune, March 29, 1939:

‘The war now proposed is for the purpose of establishing Jewish influence throughout the world.’

HERDER, JOHANN GOTTFRIED. 18th century German philosopher.

‘The Jewish people is and remains in Europe an Asiatic people alien to our part of the world, bound to that old law which it received in a distant climate, and which, according to its confession, it cannot do away with…

How many of this alien people can be tolerated without injury to the true citizen?

A ministry in which a Jew is supreme, a household in which a Jew has the key of the wardrobe and the management of the finances, a department or commissariat in which Jews do the principal business, are Pontine marshes which cannot be drained. (Bekehrung der Juden)

For thousands of years, since their emergence on the stage of history, the Jews were a parasitic growth on the stem of other nations, a race of cunning brokers all over the earth. They have caused great evil to many ill-organized states, by retarding the free and natural economic development of their indigenous population. (’Hebraer,’ in Ideen)

BONAPARTE, NAPOLEON. French statesman, general.

‘The Jews provided troops for my campaign in Poland, but they ought to reimburse me: I soon found that they are no good for anything but selling old clothes…’

‘Legislating must be put in effect everywhere that the general well-being is in danger. The government cannot look with indifference on the way a despicable nation takes possession of all the provinces of France. The Jews are the master robbers of the modern age; they are the carrion birds of humanity… ‘They must be treated with political justice, not with civil justice. They are surely not real citizens.’

‘The Jews have practiced usury since the time of Moses, and oppressed the other peoples. Meanwhile, the Christians were only rarely usurers, falling into disgrace when they did so. We ought to ban the Jews from commerce because they abuse it… The evils of the Jews do not stem from individuals but from the fundamental nature of this people.’ (From Napoleon’s Reflections, and from speeches before the Council of State on April 30 and May 7, 1806.)

‘Nothing more contemptible could be done than the reception of the Jews by you. I decided to improve the Jews. But I do not want more of them in my kingdom. Indeed, I have done all to prove my scorn of the most vile nation in the world.’ (Letter to his brother Jerome, King of Westphalia, March 6, 1808)

(1) Every big and small Jew in the peddling trade must renew his license every year.

(2) Checks and other obligations are only redeemable if the Jew can prove that he has obtained the money without cheating. (Ordinance of March 17, 1808. Napoleonic Code.)

DE GAULLE, CHARLES. 20th century French politician.

Addressing the Zionist imbroglio in the Mideast in a news conference of November 27, 1967, he observed:

‘The Jews remain what they have been at all times: an elite people, self-confident and domineering.’

SAND, GEORGE (Amantine Dupin Dudevant). 19th century French novelist.

‘I saw in ‘the wandering Jew’ the personification of the Jewish people, exiled in the Middle Ages. Nevertheless, they are once again extremely rich, owing to their unfailing rude greediness and their indefatigable activity. With their hard-heartedness that they extend toward people of other faiths and races they are at the point of making themselves kings of the world. This people can thank its obstinacy that France will be Judized within fifty years. Already some wise Jews prophesy this frankly.’ (Letter to Victor Lorie, 1857)


In an address to the ASSEMBLEE in 1790, the city’s revolutionary leaders opposed citizenship for Jews, because:

‘Everyone knew the inherent bad character of the Jews and no one doubted they were foreigners… Let the ‘enlighteners’ stop defaming the Gentiles by blaming them for what is wrong with the Jews. Their conduct is their own fault. Perhaps the Jews might eventually give up every aspect of their separation and all the characteristics of their nature. Let us sit and wait until that happens; we might then judge them to be worthy of equality. (Tres Humble Adresse qui Presente la Commune de la Ville Strasbourg)

ROBERTS, STEPHEN H. 20th century Australian historian.

Though hostile on almost every point to National Socialism, his The House that Hitler Built does admit that Jews were a menace in Germany:

‘It is useless to deny that grave Jewish problems existed in Germany. The nation was in the unfortunate geographical position of being the first stage in the perennial push westward of the Polish Jews. Unless forced on, they tended to stop in Berlin and Hamburg, where they obtained an unduly share of good professional positions. In Berlin, for example, when the Nazi came to power, 50.2 percent of the lawyers were Jews. In medicine, 48 per cent of the doctors were Jews, and it was said that they systematically seized the principal hospital posts. The Jews owned the largest and most important Berlin newspapers, and they had made great inroads on the educational system.’

FRANCO, FRANCISCO. 20th century Spanish statesman.

In his victory speech in Madrid, on May 19, 1939, he declared:

‘Let us be under no illusion. The Jewish spirit, which was responsible for the alliance of large-scale capital with Marxism and was the driving force behind so many anti-Spanish revolutionary agreements, will not be got rid of in a day.’

PRIMO DE RIVERA, JOSE. 20th century Spanish political reformer (assassinated by the Communists).

He stressed that the instruments of Jewish domination in the modern world are money and the press, and that communism is an instrument of international Jewish capitalism used to smash and afterwards rule the nations. (El Estado Nacional)

H. H. BEAMISH, in a New York address, October 30 November 1, 1937:

‘In 1848 the word ‘anti-Semitic’ was invented by the Jews to prevent the use of the word ‘Jew.’ The right word for them is ‘Jew’ …

‘I implore all of you to be accurate call them Jews. There is no need to be delicate on this Jewish question. You must face them in this country. The Jew should be satisfied here. I was here forty-seven years ago; your doors were thrown open to the Jews and they were free. Now he has got you absolutely by the throat that is your reward.’

CHRISTEA, PATRIARCH. 20th century Romanian prelate.

‘The Jews have caused an epidemic of corruption and social unrest. They monopolize the press, which, with foreign help, flays all the spiritual treasures of the Romanians. To defend ourselves is a national and patriotic duty not anti-Semitism. Lack of measures to get rid of the plague would indicate that we are lazy cowards who let ourselves be carried alive to our graves. Why should we not get rid of these parasites who suck Romanian and Christian blood? It is logical and holy to react against them.’ (New York Herald Tribune, August 17, 1937)

HOUSTON STEWART CHAMBERLAIN, world famed author of Foundations of the Nineteenth Century, Vol. I, page 337:

‘The revelation of Christ has no significance for the Jew! … I have searched through a whole library of Jewish books in the expectation of finding naturally not belief in the Divinity of Christ, nor the idea of redemption, but the purely human feeling for the greatness of the suffering Savior but in vain. A Jew who feels that, is, in fact, no longer a Jew, but a denier of Judiasm. And while we find, even in Mohammed’s Koran, at least a vague conception of the importance of Christ and profound reverence for His personality, a cultured leading Jew of the nineteenth century (Graetz) calls Christ ‘the new birth with the death mask,’ which inflicted new and painful wounds upon the Jewish people; he cannot see anything else in Him. In view of the Cross he assures us that ‘the Jews do not require this convulsive emotion for their spiritual improvement,’ and adds, ‘particularly not among the middle classes of inhabitants of the cities.’ His comprehension goes further. In a book, republished in 1880, by a Spanish Jew (Mose de Leon) Jesus Christ is called a ‘dead dog’ that lies ‘buried in a dunghill.’ Besides, the Jews have taken care to issue in the latter part of the nineteen century several editions (naturally in Hebrew) of the so-called ‘censured passages’ from the Talmud, those passages usually omitted in which Christ is exposed to our scorn and hatred as a ‘fool,’ ‘sorcerer,’ ‘profane person,’ ‘idolater,’ ‘dog,’ ‘bastard,’ ‘child of lust,’ etc.: so, too, His sublime Mother.’

ADRIEN ARCAND, Canadian political leader of the 1930s:

‘Through their (Jew’s) international news agencies, they mold your minds and have you see the world not as it is, but as they want you to see it. Through their cinema, they are the educators of our youth and with just one film in two hours, can wipe out of a child’s brain what he has learned in six months in the home, the church or the school.’

NESTA WEBSTER, in her book Germany and England:

‘England is no longer controlled by Britons. We are under the invisible Jewish dictatorship a dictatorship that can be felt in every sphere of life.’

HENRY WALLACE, Secretary of Commerce, under President Harry Truman.

Wrote in his dairy that in 1946,

‘Truman was ‘exasperated’ over Jewish pressure that he support Zionist rule over Palestine. Wallace added ‘Pres. Truman expressed himself as being very much ‘put out’ with the Jews. He said that ‘Jesus Christ couldn’t please them when he was here on Earth, so how could anyone expect that I would have any luck?’ Pres. Truman said he had no use for them and didn’t care what happened to them.’

WILLIAM JENNINGS BRYANT, three times the Democratic Party candidate for President said:

‘New York is the city of privilege. Here is the seat of the Invisible Power represented by the allied forces of finance and industry. This Invisible Government is reactionary, sinister, unscrupulous, mercenary, and sordid. It is wanting in national ideals and devoid of conscience… This kind of government must be scourged and destroyed.’

HENRY ADAMS (Descendant of President John Adams), in a letter to John Hay, October 1895:

‘The Jewish question is really the most serious of our problems.’

SPRING-RICE, SIR CECIL. 20th century British politician.

‘One by one, the Jews are capturing the principal newspapers of America. (Letter of November 1914, to Sir Edward Grey, foreign secretary. Letters and Friendships)

CAPOTE, TRUMAN. 20th century American writer.

In an interview, he assailed ‘the Zionist mafia’ monopolizing publishing today, and protested a tendency to suppress things that do not meet with Jewish approval. (Playboy magazine, March 1968)

VOLTAIRE (Francois Marie Arouet) 18th century French philosopher, writer.

‘Why are the Jews hated? It is the inevitable result of their laws; they either have to conquer everybody or be hated by the whole human race…’

‘The Jewish nation dares to display an irreconcilable hatred toward all nations, and revolts against all masters; always superstitious, always greedy for the well-being enjoyed by others, always barbarous cringing in misfortune and insolent in prosperity.’ (Essai sur le Moeurs)

‘You seem to me to be the maddest of the lot. The Kaffirs, the Hottentots, and the Negroes of Guinea are much more reasonable and more honest people than your ancestors, the Jews. You have surpassed all nations in impertinent fables, in bad conduct and in barbarism. You deserve to be punished, for this is your destiny.’ (From a letter to a Jew who had written to him, complaining of his ‘anti-Semitism.’ Examen des Quelques Objections… dans L’Essai sur le Moeurs.)

‘You will only find in the Jews an ignorant and barbarous people, who for a long time have joined the most sordid avarice to the most detestable superstition and to the most invincible hatred of all peoples which tolerate and enrich them.’ (’Juif,’ Dictionnaire Philosophique)

‘I know that there are some Jews in the English colonies. These marranos go wherever there is money to be made… But whether these circumcised who sell old clothes claim that they are of the tribe of Naphtali or Issachar is not of the slightest importance. They are, simply, the biggest scoundrels who have ever dirtied the face of the earth.’ (Letter to Jean-Baptiste Nicolas de Lisle de Sales, December 15, 1773. Correspondence. 86:166)

‘They are, all of them, born with raging fanaticism in their hearts, just as the Bretons and the Germans are born with blond hair. I would not be in the least bit surprised if these people would not some day become deadly to the human race.’ (Lettres de Memmius a Ciceron, 1771)

CANNOT, E. 19th century French reformer.

In La Renovation, journal of the socialist school of CHARLES FOURIER.

‘Jews! To the heights of your Sinai… I humbly lift myself. I stand erect and cry out to you, in behalf of all my humble equals, of all those whom your spoliation has brought to grief, who died in misery through you and whose trembling shades accuse you: Jews! for Cain and Iscariot, leave us, leave us! Ah, cross the Red Sea again, and go down there to the desert, to the promised land which is waiting for you, the only country fit for you; o you wicked, rude and dishonest people, go there!!! (’Israel’)

DOUGLAS REED, Chief War Correspondent for London Times, author of The Controversy of Zion, Ch. 32, ‘The World Revolution Again’, P. 274:

At the time, the facts were available. The British Government’s White Paper of 1919 (Russia, No. 1, a Collection of Reports on Bolshevism) quoted the report sent to Mr. Balfour in London in 1918 by the Netherlands Minister at Saint Petersburg, M. Oudendyke: ‘Bolshevism is organized and worked by Jews, who have no nationality and whose one object is to destroy for their own ends the existing order of things’. The United States Ambassador, Mr. David R. Francis, reported similarly: ‘The Bolshevik leaders here, most of whom are Jews and 90 percent of whom are returned exiles, care little for Russia or any other country but are internationalists and they are trying to start a worldwide social revolution’. M. Oudendyke’s report was deleted from later editions of the British official publication and all such authentic documents of that period are now difficult to obtain. Fortunately for the student, one witness preserved the official record.

This was Mr. Robert Wilton, correspondent of the London Times, who experienced the Bolshevik revolution. The French edition of his book included the official Bolshevik lists of the membership of the ruling revolutionary bodies (they were omitted from the English edition).

These records show that the Central Committee of the Bolshevik party, which wielded the supreme power, contained 3 Russians (including Lenin) [Lenin is now recognized to be Jewish as well. Ed.] and 9 Jews. The next body in importance, the Central Committee of the Executive Commission (or secret police) comprized 42 Jews and 19 Russians, Letts, Georgians and others. The Council of People’s Commissars consisted of 17 Jews and five others. The Moscow Cheka (secret police) was formed of 23 Jews and 13 others. Among the names of 556 high officials of the Bolshevik state officially published in 1918-1919, were 458 Jews and 108 others. Among the central committees of small, supposedly ‘Socialist’ or other non-Communist parties (during that early period the semblance of ‘opposition’ was permitted, to beguile the masses, accustomed under the Czar to opposition parties) were 55 Jews and 6 others. All the names are given in the original documents reproduced by Mr. Wilton. (In parentheses, the composition of the two short-lived Bolshevik governments outside Russia in 1918-1919, namely those of Hungary and Bavaria, was similar).

{ Comments are closed }

Resisting the New World Order (NWO) War Against All of Humanity Video by Sean M. Madden


Dear Truth Seekers,
Sean Madden’s talk regarding the New World Order agenda is worthy of a listen. The main thesis throughout his talk revolves around the concept that we are and have been deeply immersed in a global or world conflict for well over a century now; one contrived and headed by the Zionist forces which have been operating behind the curtains of media and academia and banking and government covers well before the creation of the US Federal Reserve in 1913.
The message is to stop plugging in to the global matrix of lies and deception. Stop watching global TV. Stop reading the msm publications. Stop watching Hollywood scripts that reinforce the lies. Stop connecting up with the dialectic that the Zionists have projected onto the world via their controlled media. Stop participating in the Big Lie, the Big Deception. Stop falling prey to every new incident which the Zionists orchestrate in advance to keep the masses distracted from seeing beyond the smoke cover that they continually rekindle with false flag after false flag in order to smother and obfuscate and steer people along pre-conceived paths that all end up being cul de sacs, dead ends leading to more confusion and impasses that ultimately stymie the one essential revelation necessary to spur people on to greater and greater resistance, that being the realization that the dichotomy we’re told exists is but a facade.
It bears repeating these basic truths as the degree of deception is being ratcheted up and up with each new passing day making it more and more onerous for people to stay focussed on the basics. Sean does a bang up job of reinforcing those basics. Do share this important talk with those who are still confused about global events.
P.S. I must preface Sean’s comments on Putin and Russia by stating that I take them with a grain of salt at this point. It may just be my long standing connection with Edgar Cayce that prompts me to say this. Time, of course, reveals all.

{ Comments are closed }

Reply to Mark Weber by Robert Faurisson

I shall briefly sum up for you what, precisely, our recent exchange of correspondence has been. For greater clarity, I find myself obliged to emphasise certain words of this exchange, although I do not care for the practice. You will see that, contrary to what you venture to say, the letter that I sent you and made public on 17 December was neither ‘misleading’ nor ‘unfair’. You will also see, at the end of this reply, that you have made a monumental muddle of a text of mine of which you quote a very brief fragment; by so doing, you have been ‘misleading’ or ‘unfair’ or both. In conclusion, I will show that this controversy may in the end lead to a heartening prospect for the future of revisionism.
My question of 17 December was: ‘Tell me whether or not you SAY, as I myself have so clearly STATED for so many years, that the alleged Nazi GAS CHAMBERS and the alleged Nazi GAS VANS never EXISTED’. The question was clear: it focused 1) on what you SAY or STATE, 2) on the very EXISTENCE, 3) of the alleged Nazi GAS CHAMBERS, 4) and of the alleged Nazi GAS VANS.
Instead of answering this question directly, you wrote back: ‘I don’t believe the claims about the alleged Nazi gas chambers’. That act of faith was not what I was looking for. Effectively, whereas I was waiting to see what you, as a historian, would SAY or STATE, you answered by what you DIDN’T BELIEVE. Then, you asserted that you did not BELIEVE in CLAIMS, a particularly vague word; the remark may mean that you refuse to believe certain statements concerning the said gas chambers, but not necessarily all such statements; the choice of the word ‘CLAIMS’ may mean that you call into question certain aspects of the story of the Nazi gas chambers (their number, location, performance) but not necessarily the affirmation of their existence itself. Finally, with such a sentence you do not, as all may see, breathe a word of the ‘gas vans’.
Noting that with so vague a sentence you had not gone into the subject, I did not feel the need to deal with it in my letter itself, but, in the accompanying message, addressed to Jean Plantin, Yvonne Schleiter and Arthur Butz at the same time as to you, I plainly told you: ‘I did not ask for your ‘beliefs’ (?) about ‘claims’ (?) and, moreover, you do not mention the Nazi gas vans’.
Nor did I deal with your prologue regarding at once Dachau, Mauthausen, Hartheim and your ‘limited’ knowledge of technical and chemical matters. As is my habit, I went straight to the heart of the matter and so it was that, leaving to one side everything of the order of more or less trifling preliminary remarks, I extracted from your response the lone sentence that constituted an answer, FINALLY, to the question put. And that answer was as follows: ‘I do not like to say that the ‘Nazi gas chambers never existed’, in part because I do not regard myself as any kind of specialist of ‘gas chambers’ and in part because I avoid making such categorical statements.’
I think it useless here to run once more through the remarks that such a pitiful answer inspires me to make. It is typical of what I call ‘spineless Revisionism’. At the 2002 conference, I protested against this form of revisionism and suggested that, in future, revisionists come out fighting. I find comical the insistence of some revisionist ‘researchers’ on still looking into ‘the problem of the gas chambers’. We are not about to carry on this way till the end of time killing what has already, on the commonsense level, been ‘overkilled’. But with our ‘researchers’ the corpse of the ‘Nazi gas chambers or vans’ is buried, then exhumed to be put in a coffin into which one more nail is driven. The role of an Institute like the IHR ought to be to come out with a formal assertion, one requiring neither technical nor chemical expertise but rather of the simplest kind: For more than half a century, Germany’s accusers have in the end revealed their inability to let us see a single specimen of the alleged weapons of mass destruction that the Nazis are said to have designed, built or used for ‘The Destruction of the European Jews’ (Raul Hilberg).
Whatever you do, don’t moan that ‘Given that you have not pressed me for my view on Nazi gas chambers during the past ten years or so, I don’t understand why you have been pressing me on this in recent weeks’. In reality, you know perfectly well that there has been this point of discord between us for quite a long time. I have reminded you of the instance at which you and I confronted one another on it ten years ago in Washington. There was also, though you seem not to remember, another instance, over the telephone, on the subject of a statement of yours during a talk-show on a Black radio station. And I am not the only one to deplore Mark Weber’s shilly-shallying with regard to the gas chambers. I can recall Fritz Berg rightly complaining of your dodging the question. Carlos Porter also seems to find you are dancing around. I myself have had to approach you more than once in order to get you to respond. And now, finally, that your response is known, it is understandable why you have tried to dodge an irksome question. But, is it normal, Mark Weber, to conceal from the IHR’s readers, members, dues-paying supporters that their editor perhaps refuses, to a certain degree, to BELIEVE a lie and a historic slander but DOES NOT LIKE to have to say so? How many people imagine that for the Editor of the Journal of Historical Review a proper reply to that slander is: ‘I do not like to say that ‘the Nazis gas chambers never existed’’?
During the above-mentioned talk-show, you stated: ‘I do not deny the Holocaust happened but ’ I immediately told you how deadly wrong it was to make such a CONCESSION to The Big Lie and Defamation. You retort now that in 1991 I myself declared: ‘Revisionists do not deny the genocide and the gas chambers’. There you make a fine muddle. I said then, on the contrary, that by the acceptance of the word ‘deny’ an untoward CONCESSION was made to the liars. I give you below the full text of my remark, that was published under the altogether unambiguous title ‘AFFIRMATION, NOT DENIAL’:
A reminder: Revisionists do not deny the genocide and the gas chambers. This is a MISCONCEPTION. Galileo didn’t deny that the earth was stationary; he AFFIRMED, at the conclusion of his research, that the earth was not stationary, but that it rotated on its axis and revolved around the sun. In the same way, the revisionists, after concluding their own research, AFFIRM that there was no genocide and no gas chambers, and that the ’ final solution of the Jewish question ’ consisted of the removal of the Jews from Europe by emigration if possible, and by deportation if necessary. The revisionists strive to establish what happened ; they are positive while the exterminationists doggedly continue to tell us about things which didn’t happen : their work is negative. The Revisionists stand for the reconciliation of the antagonists in the recognition of what really happened. (Robert Faurisson, The Journal of Historical Review, January-February 1999, p. 21).
In other words, I make with that remark the opposite of a CONCESSION. In a general way, not only do I expose the enthusiasts of the Big Lie for what they are, but I also refuse to borrow their least turn of phrase. The revisionists must show themselves to be candid, unbending and without CONCESSION. The time for CONCESSIONS is over.
I come now to the possibility, mentioned at the outset, of an interesting prospect for the future of revisionism. On 2 June 2003, I published the following short article.
Hitler’s and Saddam’s Weapons of Mass Destruction
Is it not wonderful to get the same lie from the same people and for the same purpose?
In January 1944, President Franklin D. Roosevelt decided to create, at the request of the Jew Henry Morgenthau and his fellows, the so-called War Refugee Board (WRB). In November 1944, that official body published, under the heading ‘Executive Office of the President / War Refugee Board / Washington, DC’, a report entitled German Extermination Camps Auschwitz and Birkenau, falsely accusing Adolf Hitler of having weapons of mass destruction or WMD (called execution gas chambers).
In 2002, President George W. Bush decided to create, at the request of the Jew Paul Wolfowitz and his fellows, the so-called Office of Special Plans (OSP). That official body authored reports falsely accusing Saddam Hussein of having WMD.
The lie was the same: an accusation based on false evidence. The people were the same: powerful American Jews. The purpose was the same: war.
But there were also differences. First, the lie against Hitler was about impossible and inconceivable WMD (for physical and chemical reasons) while the lie against Saddam Hussein was about quite possible and conceivable WMD since his accusers themselves had the same kind of weapons. Secondly, the lie against Adolf Hitler was more than half a century old and stronger than ever while the lie against Saddam Hussein was a few months old and already not too strong. Thirdly, if someone disputed the accusation against Adolf Hitler, he might go to prison like Ernst Zundel while, if someone disputed the accusation against Saddam Hussein, he might, at least currently, be taking limited risks.
Observe how the lie was built against Saddam Hussein and you will see exactly how the lie against Adolf Hitler was forged by the same kind of people and for the same purpose: perpetual war.
When you, Mark Weber, recently held a conference with David Irving on current world events, I suppose that the two of you had a good laugh with the tale of Saddam Hussein’s WMD’s. If so, did you also have a laugh with Adolf Hitler’s WMD’s? And, if you did not, may one ask why?
It is time for the end of this COMEDY that consists in demanding that the Allies show us those weapons that Saddam is said to have possessed whilst, on the subject of the far more fantastic weapons that Hitler is said to have possessed and used on a large scale, Mark Weber is as reserved as a shy young maiden. With Saddam’s WMD’s, our patience did not last even a year, whereas with Hitler’s we shall soon have shown sixty years of patience.
In the late 1970s I myself opened the way to material revisionist studies, looking into the technical, physical, chemical, topographical and architectural aspects of the matter of Hitler’s alleged WMD’s. On this level, the revisionists have attained results of such abundance and precision that, little by little, the LIARS have found themselves at a loss for any answer. Their museums of the ‘Holocaust’ have been unable to take up my final 1992 challenge: ‘Show me or draw me a Nazi gas chamber’. And what is true of the ‘Nazi gas chambers’ is equally true of the ‘Nazi gas vans’ or ‘Jewish soap’ or lampshades made of human skin or still other nonsense.
I therefore suggest that the revisionists today close the book on this physical, chemical and other material research, for it is in fact taking a progressively pedantic turn. It is becoming ‘art for art’s sake’. These redundant studies have, above all, the disastrous effect of making a problem appear complicated when it is actually altogether easy to solve.
It is pitiful when the head of an institute of revisionist studies is reduced to confessing: ‘I do not like to say that the Nazi gas chambers never existed’. It is regrettable that he should have concealed that attitude up to now and that only my insistence on getting an answer on the subject made him come out with it. It is a pity that, seeking to vindicate his position, he wrongly accused me of having been ‘misleading and unfair’. It is lamentable that in the dispute with me he should bring up a text of mine whose meaning he distorts to the point of turning it entirely around.
But it is heartening to see that I am now far from alone in denouncing a revisionism that has had its day and in advocating a new revisionism, more clear-cut, straightforward, vigorous and able, for a start, to put it to the upholders of the Big Lie that ‘The best proof that your Nazi gas chambers and your Nazi gas vans did not exist any more than your Jewish soap, your lampshades of human skin and so much other nonsense of a vile war propaganda is that, more than fifty years after that war, your ‘scientific experts’ are, more than ever, unable to show them to us’.
This new revisionism, which demands character, calls for young and spirited men.
‘Hitler’s gas chambers are like Saddam’s weapons of mass destruction: THEY’VE NEVER BEEN SEEN!’ Voiced by a woman, this radio-style watchword has for the past few weeks been making the rounds of a French revisionist news group. I recommend that it be taken up with insistence in all revisionist publications and correspondence for as long as the Allies have not found Saddam’s secret weapons. As for the Liars who, to display Nazi gas chambers, put on view for us a section of wall or a door with a small window or a showerhead or a spyhole or a pair of shoes with the inscription ‘We are the last witnesses’ (as seen at the Washington Holocaust Memorial Museum), they make one think of General Colin Powell who, at the UN, showed photos of buildings or trucks supposed to represent Saddam’s weapons of mass destruction. And no one will have forgotten the ‘phial of poison’ brandished there by the same general, himself raised, as his biographers tell us, in Yiddishtown (New York). The phial contained only a sort of sneezing powder. It was pure, unadulterated ‘Nuremberg trial’!
22 December 2003

{ Comments are closed }