Search results for: "trial"

Regina v Radical Press Legal Update #25

RPEdNew400-copy-3 copy 2

Dear Free Speech Defenders and Radical Press Supporters,
It’s been close to a year since I last posted a Legal Update back on August 8th, 2015. That was prior to the actual trial which began on October 26th, 2015 and concluded fourteen days later on November 12th, 2015.
The outcome of the trial, as many will know, resulted in a Guilty charge on Count 1 and a Not Guilty charge on Count 2. What was perplexing for everyone who heard the results (including myself) was that BOTH Counts 1 and 2 were the same charge, that is, both were a Sec. 319(2) Criminal Code of Canada offence which reads:
‘(2) Every one who, by communicating statements, other than in private conversation, wilfully promotes hatred against any identifiable group is guilty of
(a) an indictable offence and is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years; or
(b) an offence punishable on summary conviction.’
Immediately following the trial a date was set for December 7th, 2015 in order to fix a date for the Charter application hearing to be heard. The Charter issue had already began back in the spring of 2015 but was postponed pending the outcome of the trial. Had I been victorious and found Not Guilty on both counts there would not have been grounds to file the challenge to the legislation. That date came and went and Crown and Defence were unable to agree upon a date for the hearing. It was put over to January 25th, 2016. On the January date issues came up about Defence calling Expert Witnesses and so it was rescheduled to March 29th, 2016 to fix a date. March 29th came and went and more delays required the setting a new date of April 4th. The 4th of April came and went and another date of May 2nd was chosen. On May 2nd the computers in the courtroom malfunctioned causing further delays and a new date of June 6th was set. On June 6th Defence counsel’s computer went down and a new date of July 11th, 2016 was set. After eight months and seven attempts to fix a date the deed was finally accomplished on the 11th of July!
As it now stands the Charter application will be heard in Quesnel Supreme Court beginning October 3rd, 2016 and run (possibly) for the full week to October 7th, 2016.
As stated previously, I, as the Applicant will be raising the following issues; ones that are included in my Memorandum of Argument:
• Section 319(2) of the Criminal Code constitutes an infringement of Section 2(b) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
• The Crown bears the onus of justifying the infringement of Charter rights on a case-by-case basis.
• The present case is distinguishable from Keegstra on its facts.
• The infringement of Section 2(b) of the Charter is not reasonably justified by Section 1 in the circumstances of this case, and specifically: The ‘pressing and substantial objective’ of legislation must be defined narrowly for the purpose of a Section 1 analysis.
• The use of Section 319(2) in this case is not rationally connected to the pressing and substantial objective of preventing harms associated with hate propaganda.
• Criminal prosecution by indictment is not a minimal impairment of the Applicant’s Charter rights.
• The infringement of the Applicant’s Charter rights is disproportionate to any possible salutary effect that Section 319(2) could have in the circumstances of this case.
• The appropriate remedy is to read into the law a constitutional exemption, to the effect that Section 319(2) is not a reasonable limit on Section 2(b) in circumstances where the allegedly hateful material is legal to possess and lawfully available from other sources.
The bottom line is that Section 319(2) of the Criminal Code constitutes an infringement of Section 2(b) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms which states:
‘Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms: …
(b) freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication …’
The Order that I intend to pursue is based upon Section 52(1) of the Constitution Act, 1982 reads as follows:
‘52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is inconsistent with the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of no force or effect.’
Citing R. v. Sharpe in support of Section 52(1) I will be respectfully requesting an order that would read as follows:
A declaration that Section 319(2) of the Criminal Code constitutes an infringement of Section 2(b) of the Charter, as already established in R. v. Keegstra.
A declaration, pursuant to Section 52(1) of the Constitution Act, 1982, that Section 319(2) of the Criminal Code is not reasonably justified by Section 1 of the Charter in circumstances where the allegedly hateful material is legal to possess and lawfully available from other sources.
Crown of course will be arguing that the applicant’s (my) argument is entirely without merit.
Now that the date has been set there is still the responsibility on my part to cover a number of financial costs related to the hiring of Expert Witnesses and also travel expenses and accommodations for legal assistants who I will be bringing to Quesnel for the week of the Charter hearing. These and many other miscellaneous costs that are part of this ongoing process must be raised over the next two months in order accomplish our goals. Any help that people can offer will be gratefully accepted and put to good use.
Donations can be made online via my GoGetFunding site located at http://gogetfunding.com/canadian-publisher-faces-jail-for-political-writings/ or else by sending cash, cheques or Money Orders to the following postal address. Please make sure that any cheques or Money Orders are made out to Arthur Topham and sent to:
Arthur Topham
4633 Barkerville Highway
Quesnel, B.C.
V2J 6T8
Thank You All for your ongoing help throughout this long process!

{ Add a Comment }

CANADA: The New Sodom and Gomorrah? By Arthur Topham

CANADASODOM?

On May 17th, 2016, a day recognized by the federal government as ‘International Day Against Homophobia, Transphobia, and Biphobia’, an edict emanated forth from Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s office (PMO) stating that the Liberal government was planning to make additional changes to the ‘Hate Propaganda’ laws (Sections 318 to 320) of the Criminal Code of Canada in order to ‘protect’ the nation’s sexually deviant members.
UpYoursTrudeauJr
The unabashed and strident manner in which the federal government is pushing forward with its controversial agenda of planned perversion and subversion of Canadian society (under the guise of supposed ‘human rights’ for sexual aberrants) is an issue fraught with deep and troubling concern, not only those Canadians of the Christian faith who prefer to rely upon the eternal wisdom of God and Nature but also for millions of other citizens whose moral standards won’t permit them to accept the subversive and sinister hidden aim within the government’s mandate to criminalize public dissent and discussion on moral, ethical and health standards affecting the nation as a whole.
In the words of the PM, ‘To do its part, the Government of Canada today will introduce legislation that will help ensure transgender and other gender-diverse people can live according to their gender identity, free from discrimination, and protected from hate propaganda and hate crimes.’
FREEXPRESSIONLOCKUP copy 4
The reality that the federal government intends to expand rather than repeal Section 318 320 of the Canadian Criminal Code is disconcerting in itself given the excessively subjective nature of this draconian section of the Code. The concept of ‘Hate Propaganda’ as a ‘criminal offence’ is nothing less than a blatant example of government mind control; one that, here in Canada, has proven itself over the last half century of contentious litigation, to be extremely controversial, provocative and unjust and a clear and present danger to freedom of expression or ‘free speech’ as defined by Canada’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
The alarm bells ought to be ringing across the country at the thought of this new ‘Liberal’ government of Justin Trudeau pulling the Orwellian zipper of censorship even tighter over the mouths of Canada’s citizens than his predecessor Harper. It appears to be a new day but still the same old shit of increasingly repressive laws and greater restrictions on individual freedoms theoretically guaranteed by our Charter.
5FeetFury copy
In fact the threat of expanding Canada’s ‘hate’ laws to include ‘Tranny’(i.e. transvestite) protection has already angered and incensed Canadian bloggers as we see in the following reaction by Kathy Shaidle, one of the veterans of the previous ‘Section 13’ wars that were ongoing during Harper’s reign.
As I’ve stated numerous times and especially in my essay Bad Moon Rising: How the Jewish Lobbies Created Canada’s ‘Hate Propaganda’ Laws, these Communist-inspired laws were surreptitiously and deliberately put in place through the mendacious actions of various Jewish lobby organizations such as the Canadian Jewish Congress, B’nai Brith Canada and, more recently, the newly-formed Centre for Israel & Jewish Affairs, all of whom have worked in tandem for decades to ensure that issues to do with Israel and its Zionist ideological political system would ultimately fall within this section of the Code and therefore make any truthful and factual statements about important civil and national issues indictable offences.
What must be clearly understood from the start when discussing the issue of ‘Hate Propaganda’ laws is that the notion of elevating the natural emotional feeling of hatred into a pseudo-legal category wherein it becomes an indictable offence is purely an invention of the Zionist Jews and in certain respects an historical concomitant of the Bolshevik era’s Leninist/Stalinist totalitarian terror regimes. One could rightly state that its essential character is embodied in such classics of ‘hate’ literature as Germany Must Perish!, a book written back in 1941 by the Jewish author Theodore N. Kaufman with the sole purpose of inciting America to hate Germany and then translate that hatred into the USA joining the Allies in their unjust war against the National Socialist government of Germany.
EyeOnFreeSpeech600
In a previous article entitled Canada: Hypocrite Nation Ruled by Zionist Deception & anti-Free Speech Laws I had the following to say about these despicable, sham legal subterfuges disguised as legitimate jurisprudence:
‘The war to silence Canadians and stymie any public speech that the Jewish lobby felt might negatively impact them or Israel in any way (either on or off the internet), gained its foothold back in 1977 when the federal government first implemented the so-called Canadian Human Rights Act and created its attendant enforcement agencies, the Canadian Human Rights Commission and the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal (CHRT). Both the commission and the tribunal were quasi-judicial, i.e. ‘crazy’ judicial in that they basically set their own rules and guidelines and consistently changed the ‘legal’ goal posts depending upon whatever case they were dealing with, in order to ensure a conviction. If fact, of the hundreds of Canadians dragged before these Stalinist style ‘Show Trial’ tribunals, EVERYONE was found guilty for the simple reason that all it took was for someone to register a complain against them and that, in itself, sealed their fate. When I describe Section 13 as a ‘Bolshevik’ type law I do so with the full knowledge that under the former Soviet system, Lenin, in one of the regime’s very first acts upon gaining absolute power, was to make ‘anti-Semitism’ a crime punishable by death. Death, that is, without so much as a trial even. All it would take, (just as with the Section 13 ‘complaints’) was for someone to accuse another of said crime and the Cheka (soviet secret police) had the excuse to liquidate the victim.’
Reporting on this issue in Christian News Heather Clark remarks that apart from the criminal aspects of this proposed legislation there are those like Charles McVety, president of the Institute for Canadian Values and others who consider the bill to be ‘nebulous and reckless.’
Clark’s article goes on, ‘Bill C-16 is so vague, it is unenforceable,’ he [McVety] said in a statement. ‘The fluid nature of gender identity is so nebulous that people can change their gender identity moment by moment. In that the bill seeks to change the Criminal Code of Canada, people may be sent to prison for two years over something that is ill-defined, and indeterminable.’
‘It is also reckless as the proposed law will establish universal protection for any man who wishes to access women’s bathrooms or girls’ showers with momentary gender fluidity,’ McVety continued. ‘Every Member of Parliament should examine their conscience over the potential of their vote exposing women and girls to male genitalia.’
JewShitter
In the context of our Charter rights Clark says, ‘There is also uncertainty as to how the law will be applied to free speech. As previously reported, in 2013, the Supreme Court of Canada upheld the conviction of activist William Whatcott, who found himself in hot water after distributing flyers regarding the Bible’s prohibitions against homosexuality throughout the Saskatoon and Regina neighborhoods in 2001 and 2002.’
Bill-Whatcott-Image
As Charles McVety rightfully stated the proposed Bill C-16 is definitely ‘nebulous and reckless’ but as past convictions in both the cases of Section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act and Section 319(2) of the Canadian Criminal Code show, simply because it’s ‘vague’ doesn’t mean that it isn’t ‘enforceable’. All it takes are judges and justices within the Canadian judicial system who will interpret and lend credence to subjective definitions of nebulous terms such as ‘hatred’ so that they may then shapeshift into whatever meaning the Crown wishes in order to fit the charge. No better example currently exists than the latest and most severe case of Whatcott.
Conclusion: What’s coming next?
During the heated Sec. 13 Campaign here in Canada when the Canadian Human Rights Act was being wielded like a club by the Canadian Human Rights Commission and bloggers around the country were being bludgeoned and jailed, fined and nailed to the ‘hate crime’ cross the Zionist element within the Conservative Right finally realized that the Sec. 13 legislation no longer was serving just their purposes but was being turned against them as well. As a result they garnered the support of Canada’s Zionist media monopoly and the lobbying to repeal the specious section of the Act was eventually accomplished back in June of 2012. Unfortunately they weren’t smart enough to realize that the ‘Hate Propaganda’ laws within the Criminal Code were even more insidious than Sec. 13. They figured that as long as Sec. 319(2) of the ccc was there and could be used against critics of Israel and anyone else accused of ‘anti-Semitism’ then that was just fine with them. To hell (or jail) with ‘freedom of speech’ if it meant allowing bloggers to speak openly and frankly about the Jews or the Zionist empire builders.
But the tables appear to be turning once again as the new Liberal government of Justin Trudeau begins forcing their faggot philosophy down the throats of unwilling Canadians and then, on top of that monumental insult, threatens the nation with increased criminal penalties of up to two years in jail for anyone who doesn’t want to go happily and gayly along down the road to Sodom and Gomorrah carrying their little rainbow flag in hand.
Will they eventually start campaigning to repeal these anti-free speech laws contained in Sec. 318 to 320 of the Criminal Code and get rid of the last vestiges of Orwellian censorship in Canada?
Time will soon tell.
——
SUPPORTFREEDOMOFSPEECH
The upcoming challenge to this Zionist-created false flag legislation will determine once and for all whether or not Canada will adhere to the spirit and intent of its Charter of Rights and Freedoms or continue to bow down to foreign interests and sacrificing its citizen’s fundamental rights.
Please try to assist in this process by making a small donation to the cause. My GoGetFunding site can be found here: http://gogetfunding.com/canadian-publisher-faces-jail-for-political-writings/
Standing for Canada and our democratic ideals I remain,
Sincerely,
Arthur Topham
Pub/Ed
The Radical Press
Canada’s Radical News Network
‘Digging to the root of the issues since 1998’

{ Add a Comment }

The Hate Crime Law Concept: It is all very sinister for at least nine major reasons by William B. Fox

[Editor’s Note: The following letter of support for freedom of speech in Canada and the USA plus the article below it is an example of the type of response that RadicalPress.com is receiving from people around the world with regard to the complaint laid by B¢nai Brith Canada.
It is hoped that you will find the time to read it through and pass it along to your friends and associates.
Mr. Fox is an American who believes very strongly and passionately in the same values which those of us in Canada also are fighting to defend. His list of nine major reasons for getting rid of ‘hate crime laws is as enlightening as it is frightening for all concerned citizens who wish to be treated equally under the law.
If you haven¢t written a letter in support of this issue I would please ask you to reconsider and put your shoulder to the wheel for a common and worthy cause. See http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=936 for information on the case and also http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=937 for a suggested form letter explaining how to frame a letter to the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal. We need as many letters of support as possible so please do your best to write. Thank you.]
——————————————————-
Nancy Lafontant
Registry Officer
Canadian Human Rights Tribunal
Dear Ms. Lafontant:
I consider it a great honor to be able to send a letter in support of the free speech rights of Arthur Topham, publisher of the Radical Press, whose persecution under Canada¢s draconian ‘hate crime-related laws is being registered under file number T1360/9008.
I run the web site www.americafirstbooks.com http://www.americafirstbooks.com/ , in which I have archived the works of free speech activist Rev. Ted Pike at: http://tinyurl.com/44xyoo . There is quite a lot of material on this web page that is relevant to this case.
First, it contains numerous articles that document the underhanded tactics of the Anti-Defamation League of B¢nai Brith (an unregistered agent of Israel) to steal free speech rights under the guise of ‘hate crime laws in America as well as Canada.
Secondly, numerous articles by Rev. Ted Pike and his niece Harmony Grant explain how the Canadian Human Rights Act is exactly the kind of Orwellian nightmare that we must avoid here in America at all costs. For this reason, I spent more than two full days of my time recently calling up every member of the House Judiciary Committee in Washington, D.C. to make my own personal strenuous effort to try to defeat the currently proposed ‘hate crime legislation. An archived copy of the follow on email that I sent to Congressmen can be found here: http://tinyurl.com/bay6s4 .
Please watch Rev. Ted Pike¢s ten minute video that explains the Trojan Horse nature of proposed hate crime legislation in America, and how similar legislation has subverted Canadian free speech: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c9Fyva1Vwbk&eurl=http://www.truthtellers.org/&feature=player_embedded .
At the end of this email I have reproduced the same essay that I submitted in my emails to Congressmen. It is titled: ‘The Hate Crime Law Concept: It is all very sinister for at least nine major reasons.
To put it bluntly, when it comes to the whole ‘hate crime concept, the King wears no clothes. We should get all ‘hate crime laws off the books and go back to being more free and civilized, as both Americans and Canadians were decades ago before all this Orwellian ‘hate crime nonsense got snuck in through various Trojan Horse legislative initiatives.

As one example of an article I list in the Rev Ted Pike archive which explains the sinister nature of the Canadian Human Rights Commission is ‘Northern Gag Rule: Hate Speech Laws in Canada by Harmony Grant at: http://www.amfirstbooks.com/IntroPages/ToolBarTopics/Articles/Featured_Authors/pike_rev_ted/grant_works/Grant_2008_01-06/Harmony_Grant_20080414_Northern_Gag_Rule;_Hate_Laws_in_Canada.html
As another example, please see ‘Canada¢s Damning Example Against Hate Laws¢ also by Harmony Grant at: http://www.amfirstbooks.com/IntroPages/ToolBarTopics/Articles/Featured_Authors/pike_rev_ted/grant_works/Harmony_Grant_20070313_Canadas_Damning_Evidence_Against_Hate_Laws.html
There are other articles like this on the web page one can find by running the search words ‘Canada or ‘Canadian.
Don¢t you think it is really sad, Ms. Lafontant, that your country is now viewed so negatively? It appears that the witch hunts run by the Human Rights Commission are so alien to Anglo-Saxon common law traditions that once protected free speech.
I understand that certain members of B¢nai Brith want to suppress eighteen articles posted at Mr. Topham¢s web site. The following is a list of samples he has provided. I understand the remainder can be found at: http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=821 .
LIST OF ARTICLES USED IN B¢NAI BRITH COMPLAINT TO CHRC:
http://www.radicalpress.com/?page_id=521
The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion

B’nai Brith: Beating the anti-Semitic Drum


B¢nai B¢rith: Beating the anti-Semitic Drum
By Arthur Topham

Nationwide: Racist Me


Nationwide: Racist Me
By Chris Cook

Let’s Talk About Jews And Elections


Let¢s Talk About Jews And Elections
By Curt Maynard

The Seeds of Global Tyranny


The Seeds of Global Tyranny
By Arthur Topham

Judaism is Nobody‚s Friend


Judaism is Nobody¢s Friend
By Mark Glenn

Elie Wiesel’s Holocaust Tale


Elie Wiesel¢s Holocaust Tale
By Eric Hunt

Judaism: A Conspiracy Against Jews, Humanity?


Judaism: A Conspiracy Against Jews, Humanity?
By Henry Makow

The Many Masks of Zionism


The Many Masks of Zionism
By Arthur Topham
It is clear to me that all these articles are written in a thoughtful and intelligent manner and make an important contribution to public debate and general education.
Isn¢t it amazing how many members of B¢nai Brith can¢t take criticism, but they can sure dish out vicious criticism and other abuse on others! Just look at what their co-tribalists have done to Palestinian innocents in Gaza recently! Look at the misery that the Zionist neo-cons behind the ‘High Priests of War http://www.amfirstbooks.com/catalog/product_info.php?products_id=10 documented by authors such as Michael Collins Piper have done to millions of innocent people throughout the Middle East with their military adventurism! When was the last time you heard about B¢nai Brith members urging fellow Jews to openly protest or cut off funding for Israel because of human rights abuses? Why do they demand that laws protect them from criticism, yet it does not seem to work the other way around for others?
I urge my fellow Americans as well as brother Canadians to write emails as I have here to support Arthur Topham, a brave defender of free thought and true values of Western Civilization.
Best regards,
William B. Fox
Publisher
America First Books
P.O. Box 137
Sarver, PA 16055
Phone: 724-353-0154
William Fox [email protected]
—————————————
The Hate Crime Law Concept:
It is all very sinister for at least nine major reasons
by William B. Fox
The whole ‘hate crime’ concept serves at least nine sinister purposes:
1) It encourages the use of ‘legal terrorism,’ where laws are used as snares to wage legal harassment campaigns. Deep-pocketed entities wear out and bankrupt their political adversaries by dragging them through nuisance litigation. Employers become scared to hire or retain politically conscious straight white males for fear that they could become targets of nuisance ‘civil rights’ and ‘hate crime’-related suits or backdoor whisper campaigns or negative national media spin that could hurt their businesses.
2) ‘Hate crime’ laws support political ‘victimhood’ for ‘minorities.’ In fact, they work so well to promote artificially inflated white guilt that we see numerous cases of ‘hate crime’ hoaxes staged by minorities, such as the Tawana Brawley affair http://www.opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=110004192 .
3) The ‘hate crime’ concept creates a ‘guilt by association’ climate regarding certain topics, thereby helping to inhibit certain types of thought and analysis. This has been particularly true regarding topics involving racial differences or criminal behavior by Jews. The big danger is that once certain types of ‘thought’ is tainted with a ‘criminal association,’ and the focus of ‘criminality’ is taken off certain actions, then any thing that the people in power do not like can be tainted with ‘criminality.’ For starters, any ideas or attitudes that they find ‘subversive’ for any reason can become criminalized as ‘seditious’ (‘sedition’ implies arousing some form of ‘hatred’ or ‘dislike’ for the state). This is how Stalin was able to liquidate members of the Bolshevik old guard he did not like during the 1930’s show trials. ‘Disloyalty’ was defined as anything the self-styled ‘infallible leader’ of the Communist Party happened to say is ‘disloyal’ for the moment. Conditioning the general public to accept the concept of ‘hate crime’ is an important step towards this kind of total police state tyranny. After all, if the government today can triple penalties when someone commits a violent act against a minority member while voicing a racial epithet, just wait until they can catch you doing some little illegal thing that involves the government and then find a way to link this to something you have said that is critical of the government (immediately construed as ‘hateful’ of course) so that they can then multiply the penalties three, five, ten, or however many times they like. So for example if a cop catches you going three mph over the speed limit on a Federal road like an Interstate, they will know that you deliberately went over the speed limit because you happened to once say something critical of the government a few years back and therefore must have a ‘bad’ (or ‘hateful’) attitude. Therefore you deserve perhaps a one hundred times multiplied penalty such as ten years in a penitentiary as just desserts. If this sounds totally absurd, just reflect on how once upon a time people got shot in the old Soviet Union for very simple things like owning a copy of the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion http://www.amfirstbooks.com/IntroPages/ToolBarTopicsArticlesFeatured_Authorsmay,_captain_ericMay_worksMay_2009Capt._Eric_H._May_20090206_Questioning_%60The_Protocols_of_Zion%27.html . See how it works?
4) ‘Hate crime’ laws deflect attention away from the fact that the white population in America is being slowly genocided, and that it has its own moral right to exist. As Thomas W. Chittum observes in Civil War Two: The Coming Breakup of America http://www.amfirstbooks.com/catalog/product_info.php?products_id=18&osCsid=42402583808f9a21a1a0ae21a0d76d5c , the white population in America has been steadily declining by about 1-1.5% of the total population a year for many, many years. An American Renaissance article observed that in recent decades, 30 million white Americans have been replaced by 30 million Mexicans. European history shows that once a dominant ethno-racial group drops below 75% of the total population within a country, it tends to become increasingly unstable. Chronic instability in turn tends to lead to things like secessionism, civil war, or police state repression designed to keep things unified at all costs.
5) ‘Hate crime’ laws deflect attention away from the fact that under certain circumstances the emotion of ‘hate’ is both healthy and desirable. People instinctively feel hatred towards those things which threaten to destroy them. It motivates them to take defensive action for their own preservation. If you believe in the right of self-defense, you must believe that the trait of hatred has survived as an instinct through evolution because it is vitally necessary for basic survival.
6) ‘Hate crime’ laws tend to give the Federal government additional leverage points to control local state police. Give the massive resources of the Federal government, local state police then feel more intimidated to do whatever master puppeteer bureaucrats back in Washington, D.C. want them to do, no matter how arbitrary, ridiculous, or self-serving these things might be.
7) The piling on of more and more ‘hate crime’ laws deflects attention away from the fact that in healthy societies, relatively few laws are needed for people to get along. The ancient Roman writer Tacitus once noted that ‘Where the state is most corrupt, then the laws are most multiplied.’ The late libertarian writer Harry Browne noted how the Anglo-Saxon Common Law is generally based on a few very simple, common sense principles.
8) ‘Hate crime’ laws have been a disaster in Canada, Britain, and other supposedly ‘Western’ countries, full of draconian ‘unintended consequences.’ People have been thrown in jail for making relatively mild criticisms regarding such topics as homosexuality, Holocaust claims, and pro-nonwhite racial policies. Significantly, the greatest promoter of ‘hate laws,’ the ADL, also blindly supports corrupt police state practices in the exclusively Jewish State of Israel. Please see my analysis of breathtaking examples of Jewish supremacist tyranny, criminality, psychopathology, arrogance, and hypocrisy in my mutualism vs. parasitism http://www.amfirstbooks.com/IntroPages/ToolBarTopics/Res_Opp_Ideol/res_opp_ideol-4-mut_vs_par.html discussion. Not all Jews are bad, but for reasons that I explain in this article, they seem to have problems preventing sociopaths from rising to the top.
9) The ultimate goal of ‘hate crime’ laws is to strangle any freedom of speech that supports awareness of Jewish criminal conduct, Jewish usurpation of our Constitution, and the overall Jewish contribution towards the destruction of America. They do not want us to know about how millions of Jews occupy our power centers in our biggest cities. They do not want us to think too hard about the implications of their incredible ethnic solidarity, control of major national media, control of major wealth and businesses, and control of the privately owned central banking cartel called the Federal Reserve. They do not want us to know about Jewish orchestration of Bolshevik mass murder in Russia, the Lavon Affair http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lavon_Affair , the murder of JFK http://www.amfirstbooks.com/catalog/product_info.php?products_id=17 , their spy nests http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/motherofallscandals.html , their domination of organized crime http://www.mikepiperreport.com/Articles_Archive/AmericanFreePress/AFP2006_07-12/Michael_Collins_Piper_AFP20061030_Who_Really_Runs_U.S._Organized_Crime.html , their creation of wide-open borders to the Third World, their deliberate assault on the U.S.S. Liberty http://www.ussliberty.org/ , their ethnic cleansing of Palestine, their probable central involvement http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/israel_9-11_index.html in executing the 9-11 attacks on the Pentagon and World Trade Center buildings, and hosts of other crimes documented in books such as Final Judgment http://www.amfirstbooks.com/catalog/product_info.php?products_id=17 , The New Jerusalem http://www.amfirstbooks.com/catalog/product_info.php?products_id=11 , The High Priests of War http://www.amfirstbooks.com/catalog/product_info.php?products_id=10 , and The Viper’s Venom http://www.amfirstbooks.com/catalog/product_info.php?products_id=15 . They want us to trust the ‘New World Order’ elite totally and completely forsake popular sovereignty, the Constitution, and other traditions of freedom and self-determination related to our European ancestry and cultural heritage.
The Internet took them by surprise, so now they require more ‘hate crime’ laws. They need to restore the curtain of darkness and the wall of illusion. They need to continue their campaigns to mainstream homosexuality, promote ‘life-style’ abortions, and legitimize their Kosher brand of high treason http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/fr/576453/posts against America. Despite scholarly evidence that much of the Old Testament may be based upon fabricated stories (see my discussion of religion in my online ‘Religious Crisis’ web page http://www.amfirstbooks.com/IntroPages/NonToolbarTopics/Religious_Crisis/index.html ), or polls that show that most American Jews are atheists, they still need to posture as a self-anointed, specially favored people of God.
At a time when America is on the ropes economically with skyrocketing debt and loss of industry — at a time when America desperately needs to protect its own borders and to rebuild its internal industry, savings, and economic viability — they unmercifully use us up as their continuing cannon fodder for global interventionism. They could care less if they suck us so dry that they set the stage for a Civil War Two disaster http://www.amfirstbooks.com/IntroPages/Book_Preview_Pages/chittum-thomas_w/Civil_War_II/CivilWarII-4-PublishersPreface.html in North America.
Yes, my fellow Americans, ask not why America should continue serving as a willing stooge of Big Oil and Zionism in the Middle East. Ask not why America should willingly crucify itself for the benefit of the exclusively Jewish state of Israel. Ask not why you as a white person or as a member of a white community or even as a member of the white race even have a right to survive. (The same type of basic survival question also applies to non-Jewish nonwhites). They only want us to think in ‘approved’ areas suggested by hate crime laws regardless of the utterly destructive consequences to ourselves.
All of this having been said, I would like to revisit some of the aforementioned points with some additional commentary.
As mentioned, ‘Legal Terrorism’ involves entities with deep pockets who maliciously apply laws to drag their less well-financed adversaries through lengthy and costly legal proceedings in order to intimidate, bankrupt or otherwise neutralize them as the first objective, regardless of the merits of the cases involved. As four examples, in ‘Don’t Practice Legal Terrorism http://members.forbes.com/forbes/2006/0904/033.html ,’ (Forbes, 09.04.06), Paul Johnson charges that overzealous, deep-pocketed government regulators threaten to kill entrepreneurial risk-taking with interventionist legal actions. In the book Legal Terrorism: The Truth About the Christic Institute http://www.namebase.org/sources/aR.html , Dr. Susan Huck charged that a liberal institute misapplied Federal racketeering laws to drag out proceedings and potentially bankrupt former CIA officers, who were later awarded $1 million by a court for defendant’s legal expenses. In the book The ACLU Vs. America: Exposing the Agenda to Redefine Moral Values http://www.amazon.com/ACLU-vs-America-Exposing-Redefine/dp/0805440453/sr=1-1/qid=1170076151/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/102-6735464-1776101?ie=UTF8&s=books , authors Alan Sears and Craig Osten claim that the ACLU has misused its deep pockets to wage a campaign of ‘legal terrorism http://www.mfc.org/contents/article.cfm?id=1509 ’ in support of its radical leftist agenda against poorly financed conservative adversaries. Lastly, the book Trial on Trial: The Great Sedition Trial of 1944 http://www.amazon.com/Trial-Great-Sedition-1944/dp/9998685141/sr=1-11/qid=1170082264/ref=sr_1_11/102-6735464-1776101?ie=UTF8&s=books by Lawrence Dennis describes how FDR deliberately dragged prominent American rightists through lengthy court proceedings on spurious charges in the early 1940’s with the intent of impoverishing them, wasting their time, and intimidating would-be activists. Please see the Nov-Dec 1999 The Barnes Review online article ‘A Mockery of Justice: The Great Sedition Trial of 1944 http://www.barnesreview.org/html/novdec1999lead.html ’ by Michael Collins Piper and Ken Hoop about this sad affair.
In other words, proposed ‘hate crime’ laws are really about creating additional minefields of legal snares that dramatically increase legal defense costs, liability risks, and administrative costs for ‘little guys’ who dare to express dissident views. They are the ones who ultimately get driven under the table before plutocrats, well-endowed institutions, and deep-pocketed corporations. ‘Hate crime’ laws are ultimately about big money boys who feel their power slipping away before a free Internet. They are desperately trying to preserve their special privileges, hide their corruption, and remain empowered to abuse others.
Hate crime laws have virtually nothing to do with reducing or managing real ‘hate.’ In the final analysis, they have nothing to do with protecting gays, minorities, and other groups who are already adequately protected by the Constitution, tort law, and a vast menu of civil rights laws. However, as Rev Pike explains in his article ‘The Funeral of Free Speech http://www.AmFirstBooks.com/IntroPages/ToolBarTopics/Articles/Featured_Authors/pike_rev_ted/pike_works/Pike2005/Rev._Ted_Pike_20050926_New_Federal_Hate_Bill_Means_Funeral_Of_Free_Speech.html ,’ they have everything to do with putting state police under centralized federal command and creating a separate thought crime tribunal system (similar to what already exists in Canada) which is a major step towards a perfect police state. In fact, by suppressing civil liberties, the passage of ‘hate crime’ laws actually increase overall hatred, alienation, and resentment in society. If they are passed, they may even help spark revolutionary rebellions. This is one reason why ADL Jewish supremacists and their Establishment collaborators talk about eliminating all private gun ownership, installing ‘total surveillance http://www.infowars.com/cashless_society.htm#surveillance ,’ and quietly going about building more FEMA detention camps http://www.infowars.com/cc_archive.htm .
If there is any ‘good’ behind ‘hate crime laws,’ it is the fact that their absurdity helps thinking Americans understand the recklessly selfish, crooked, and irresponsible behavior of various members of America’s alien ruling elite who continue to poison and trash up this once truly great country. Expressed in another way, once the extremely dangerous nature of the ‘hate crime’ legislative initiatives finally sinks in, it should make responsible Americans really wonder about the malevolent and crooked character of the people who keep relentlessly pushing it.

{ Add a Comment }

The Educational System Was Designed to Keep Us Uneducated and Docile

Madcartoon

It’s no secret that the US educational system doesn’t do a very good job. Like clockwork, studies show that America’s schoolkids lag behind their peers in pretty much every industrialized nation. We hear shocking statistics about the percentage of high-school seniors who can’t find the US on an unmarked map of the world or who don’t know who Abraham Lincoln was.
Fingers are pointed at various aspects of the schooling system—overcrowded classrooms, lack of funding, teachers who can’t pass competency exams in their fields, etc. But these are just secondary problems. Even if they were cleared up, schools would still suck. Why? Because they were designed to.
How can I make such a bold statement? How do I know why America’s public school system was designed the way it was (age-segregated, six to eight 50-minute classes in a row announced by Pavlovian bells, emphasis on rote memorization, lorded over by unquestionable authority figures, etc.)? Because the men who designed, funded, and implemented America’s formal educational system in the late 1800s and early 1900s wrote about what they were doing.
Almost all of these books, articles, and reports are out of print and hard to obtain. Luckily for us, John Taylor Gatto tracked them down. Gatto was voted the New York City Teacher of the Year three times and the New York State Teacher of the Year in 1991. But he became disillusioned with schools—the way they enforce conformity, the way they kill the natural creativity, inquisitiveness, and love of learning that every little child has at the beginning. So he began to dig into terra incognita, the roots of America’s educational system.
In 1888, the Senate Committee on Education was getting jittery about the localized, non-standardized, non-mandatory form of education that was actually teaching children to read at advanced levels, to comprehend history, and, egads, to think for themselves. The committee’s report stated, ‘We believe that education is one of the principal causes of discontent of late years manifesting itself among the laboring classes.’
By the turn of the century, America’s new educrats were pushing a new form of schooling with a new mission (and it wasn’t to teach). The famous philosopher and educator John Dewey wrote in 1897:
Every teacher should realize he is a social servant set apart for the maintenance of the proper social order and the securing of the right social growth.

In his 1905 dissertation for Columbia Teachers College, Elwood Cubberly—the future Dean of Education at Stanford—wrote that schools should be factories ‘in which raw products, children, are to be shaped and formed into finished products…manufactured like nails, and the specifications for manufacturing will come from government and industry.’
The next year, the Rockefeller Education Board—which funded the creation of numerous public schools—issued a statement which read in part:
In our dreams…people yield themselves with perfect docility to our molding hands. The present educational conventions [intellectual and character education] fade from our minds, and unhampered by tradition we work our own good will upon a grateful and responsive folk. We shall not try to make these people or any of their children into philosophers or men of learning or men of science. We have not to raise up from among them authors, educators, poets or men of letters. We shall not search for embryo great artists, painters, musicians, nor lawyers, doctors, preachers, politicians, statesmen, of whom we have ample supply. The task we set before ourselves is very simple…we will organize children…and teach them to do in a perfect way the things their fathers and mothers are doing in an imperfect way.
At the same time, William Torrey Harris, US Commissioner of Education from 1889 to 1906, wrote:
Ninety-nine [students] out of a hundred are automata, careful to walk in prescribed paths, careful to follow the prescribed custom. This is not an accident but the result of substantial education, which, scientifically defined, is the subsumption of the individual.
In that same book, The Philosophy of Education, Harris also revealed:
The great purpose of school can be realized better in dark, airless, ugly places…. It is to master the physical self, to transcend the beauty of nature. School should develop the power to withdraw from the external world.
Several years later, President Woodrow Wilson would echo these sentiments in a speech to businessmen:
We want one class to have a liberal education. We want another class, a very much larger class of necessity, to forego the privilege of a liberal education and fit themselves to perform specific difficult manual tasks.
Writes Gatto: ‘Another major architect of standardized testing, H.H. Goddard, said in his book Human Efficiency (1920) that government schooling was about ‘the perfect organization of the hive.’’
While President of Harvard from 1933 to 1953, James Bryant Conant wrote that the change to a forced, rigid, potential-destroying educational system had been demanded by ‘certain industrialists and the innovative who were altering the nature of the industrial process.’
In other words, the captains of industry and government explicitly wanted an educational system that would maintain social order by teaching us just enough to get by but not enough so that we could think for ourselves, question the sociopolitical order, or communicate articulately. We were to become good worker-drones, with a razor-thin slice of the population—mainly the children of the captains of industry and government—to rise to the level where they could continue running things.
This was the openly admitted blueprint for the public schooling system, a blueprint which remains unchanged to this day. Although the true reasons behind it aren’t often publicly expressed, they’re apparently still known within education circles. Clinical psychologist Bruce E. Levine wrote in 2001:
I once consulted with a teacher of an extremely bright eight-year-old boy labeled with oppositional defiant disorder. I suggested that perhaps the boy didn’t have a disease, but was just bored. His teacher, a pleasant woman, agreed with me. However, she added, ‘They told us at the state conference that our job is to get them ready for the work world…that the children have to get used to not being stimulated all the time or they will lose their jobs in the real world.’
John Taylor Gatto’s book, The Underground History of American Education: An Intimate Investigation into the Problem of Modern Schooling (New York: Oxford Village Press, 2001), is the source for all of the above historical quotes. It is a profoundly important, unnerving book, which I recommend most highly. You can order it from Gatto’s Website, which now contains the entire book online for free.
The final quote above is from page 74 of Bruce E. Levine’s excellent book Commonsense Rebellion: Debunking Psychiatry, Confronting Society (New York: Continuum Publishing Group, 2001).

{ Add a Comment }

Horst Mahler Closing Statement

MahlerHorst2

HORST MAHLER VICTIM OF ZIONIST LIES
______________________________________
‘Words fall into the flames of injustice like raindrops into Hell’s inferno when I attempt to express my outrage at the scale and intent of this lie against humanity.’
Arthur Topham
_________________________
Thursday, February 26, 2009
From:
‘Vlkische Reichsbewegung’ [email protected]
Horst Mahler Closing Statement
Translated from the German by J M Damon
In My Show Trial Before Munich District Court II
Case No. 2 KLs 11 Js 42142/07
Closing Statement
The great mystery of human history has finally entered our consciousness as knowledge of Truth.
The passage of God through the world that He created is revealed to us as the eternal struggle within God Himself, as He participates in the struggle against evil on behalf of what we humans consider the Good. Through us, God thus becomes Absolute Spirit, which, transcending morality, is neither good nor bad.
Man cannot judge God. We can exist only as a Volk. Without a Volk, Man cannot exist as Man.
As Herder taught us, nations exist as thoughts of God. They have identity and significance only insofar as they can be distinguished from one another.
An orchestra consisting of nothing except violins would quickly bore the audience. Every Volk is a separate thought or concept of God and has the obligation to preserve itself as such, through all changes and vicissitudes.
It is the destiny of Judaism, the diffused nation within other nations, to exist as the spirit of negation. Without this spirit of negation God could not know what He is not as well as what He intends to be. Because it exists as the spirit of negation, Zion is and ever has been hated and shunned by all nations. (Book of Isaiah, Chap. 60, Verses 14 and 15).
In our (Christian) age, however, Zion has been redeemed by the nations through their acknowledgment of Judaism as ‘the negation of the lives of nations(Martin Buber.)
Zion redemption began with Jesus words:
‘You (the leaders of Zion) belong to your father, the devil, and you want to carry out your father desire.
He was a murderer from the beginning, not holding to the truth, for there is no truth in him.
When he lies, he speaks his native language, for he is a liar and the father of lies.
Because I tell the truth, you do not believe me!
(John 8, 44-45)
As servants of God the Trinity, the Jews established the Empire of Mammon as a challenge and admonition for the nations of the Earth. The Empire of Mammon is now reaching its end, however. It has the lie of Jewish ‘gas chamber genocideto thank for its culmination as well as its fall. The gas chamber or ‘Auschwitz Liewas indeed the greatest lie in the history of mankind.
Now that the world monetary swindle has culminated and been exposed, the world is asking itself: ‘How could such a swindle have occurred?It came about through international illusions about the role and the true nature of Judaism, in particular illusions about Jewish plutocrats. These illusions have now vanished, along with the make-believe homicidal gas chambers utilizing Cyclon B Insecticide at Auschwitz Concentration Camp. The Auschwitz Lie has finally run its course and the truth has triumphed.
The mighty protector of Israel, the United States of America, is disintegrating before our eyes, while the ‘HolocaustCult is devouring itself in ratlike fury by persecuting those who dare to expose it. If there were real empirical, forensic or documentary evidence for the unique crime that the Jewish-owned media call ‘Holocaust,they would certainly have presented it long ago, and this would have enabled them to neutralize their skeptics with ridicule. But there is no such evidence, since no gas chamber genocide occurred.
It is incumbent upon companions of our Volk to deliver the death blow to the Judaic ‘HolocaustCult, and this can be accomplished only through self-sacrifice. Until now we have been duped by the Jewish Media into opposing the compulsory ‘Holocaustdogma under the banner of freedom of opinion. From now on, however, we are no longer restricted to struggling for human rights under this banner. Now there is more at stake than winning freedom to express opinions. The continuation of our existence as a German nation is at stake, the survival of our Volk.
Guilt kills the human spirit, as mankind has known since the pioneering discoveries by the Jewish scientist Sigmund Freud. Section 130 Paragraph 3 of the Criminal Code is more than a mere ‘muzzle‚ it is a weapon for the spiritual destruction of our Volk, used in relentless attacks on our existence as a nation. Section 130 is illegal under international law. We are compelled to defend ourselves against it — and not just for our own sake. The German Volk is the light of the nations. We have a God-given obligation to keep it alive and beaming.
Germans must comprehend that, in the ancient Talmudic spirit, world Jewry is now attacking our right to defend ourselves and preserve our Volk with life imprisonment! Such drastic punishment is a good measure of their desperation. It has become necessary because Germans of sound character can no longer desist from speaking the truth and calling the Auschwitz Lie by its name.
Everyone who acknowledges the right and the necessity of self-defense has a duty to oppose the Jewish genocide against the German spirit. The way to oppose this genocide is to speak the truth.
In our day, the German who does not kowtow to the Jews will be relentlessly brought before the courts and deprived of his freedom, so that he will spend his life behind bars. I stand convicted of exposing Talmudic perfidiousness by ceaselessly calling the Auschwitz Lie by its name and confronting it with the truth. I have been doing this for many years now, since I swore a sacred oath to my Volk never to relent in the struggle against the ‘HolocaustCult.
At the age of 73, I can expect to spend the rest of my days under the dictates of the foreign interests that dominate our Fatherland. 21 months of imprisonment have already been pronounced. In addition to this, the vassals of foreign domination in Potsdam District Court demand another 57 months while those in Munich demand 72 months. For a 73-year-old man, a sentence of twelve and a half years is life imprisonment.
Quod erat demonstrandum! [This is what had to be demonstrated.]
I ask my fellow Germans: do you want to languish forever?
Throw off the joke of Jacob!
We have the most powerful weapon of all, the Truth.
We must make use of it!
Munich, 25 February 2009
Treason doth never prosper, what’s the reason?
For if it prosper, none dare call it treason!
Sir John Harrington 1561-1612.
Here’s freedom to him who would speak,
Here’s freedom to him who would write;
For there’s none ever feared that the truth should be heard,
Save him whom the truth would indict!
Robert Burns (1759‚96)
****************
Horst Mahler Closing Statement

{ Add a Comment }

The Rizoli rebellion by John Kaminski

RizoliRebellionHdr

I know a lot of keyboard warriors. Heck, I’m one myself, trying to convince people of the dangers we face without actually confronting them in the real world. Though my advice might be authentic, my actions are not, because I’m not out there in public battling the tyrants and swindlers who are busy ripping us off and killing those who oppose them.
Am I afraid of suffering the harsh penalties incurred by so many who have challenged the powers that be? You bet I am. Do I know the day will come when I will be forced into open warfare with the people who run our country and have turned it into a giant prison system? Absolutely I do. It could happen any day now. And each day this unpleasant but vital task inevitably draws closer.
Though I am definitely a member of an exclusive club that has tried for decades to alert my fellow citizens to the lethal danger we face living in a society governed by ruthless Jew bankers who have no real point to their lives other than stealing from others and murdering those who stand in their way, my admiration really goes out to my compatriots who step out from behind their keyboards and wade out into the public chaos to defend the courage of their convictions and expose the constant and profound crimes that are being perpetrated by our owners against ordinary people who don’t ever quite seem to grasp the danger of their own predicament and how near they are to losing everything, including their own lives.
I’ve observed Jim Rizoli stepping out into the public spotlight for ten years now, first as a courageous protester of this strange and mysterious epidemic of foreign born illegal aliens being inserted into towns all across America, seriously diminishing the lives of native-born Americans who have worked all their lives for their modest piece of the pie. They have been constantly betrayed by their own leaders.
Some might consider what Rizoli is doing as tilting at windmills, but others of a more intelligent nature realize he is a 21st century patriot running at top speed to try and prevent the descent of the United States into a thoughtless prison camp dominated by aliens from the Third World and the Warsaw ghetto.
This surreptitious sabotage of American culture has grown to epidemic proportions with a deliberate but secret program of importing Third World aliens into the U.S. that has wracked big cities and small towns with ungrateful non-English speaking migrants who overload social systems and steal jobs from unemployed locals who need them.
And more lately, Rizoli has become the chronicler of one of the great hoaxes of the 20th century, a lucrative scam that has persisted into the 21st century as disingenuous Jews continue to swindle governments around the world with their heinous heist known as Holocaust reparations.
He has done this by undertaking a series of YouTube videos aptly titled the League of Extraordinary Revisionists, introducing to the public those heroic truth tellers who have been savaged by the poisoned mainstream media yet have persevered to correct the damaging Jewish lies that not only caused the destruction of Germany back in World War II, but are now wrecking America and Europe with their Jewcentric political correctness that encourages perversion, anarchy and dependence on government to destroy a thousands of years old family structure that has been the bulwark of civilization and now teeters on the brink of ruin.
‘The Holocaust is like a wheel with spokes that extend out from the center and poison all areas of human activity,’ Rizoli likes to say.
He, like so many of us, has seen far too much of it. But he, like so few of us, has been slugging away at the corrupt basis of it for more than a decade, going nose to nose with the Jews who control the political cobwebs of every town in America.
Oddly, it was his resistance to the sudden appearance of hundreds of Brazilian immigrants in his hometown of Framingham, Mass. that eventually led him to correlate this social disease to Jewish power and more specifically to the lies that have been told about the Holocaust.
‘It all goes back to immigration,’ Jim says. ‘My brother Joe got into it first.’ Joe still writes commentaries and passes on links to his brother, but it is Jim, accompanied by his new sidekick Diane King, who are constantly updating a remarkably thorough website (ccfiile.com — note the extra ‘i’, standing for Concerned Citizens and Friends of Illegal Immigration Law Enforcement) that contains both the story of their immigration battles with the corrupt town fathers as well as a unique and thorough set of files about the Jewish manipulation of reality.
‘We held a meeting at the library, and right off the bat they jumped on us,’ Jim explained. ‘They pegged us as racists and wouldn’t let us even talk about it.
‘It made us more determined to go at it.’
It was the Rizolis’ stand against the barrage of immigrants overwhelming Framingham that initially got them in trouble with their community, repeatedly banned from their local cable TV channel, and on the Jewish Anti Defamation League’s target list as Holocaust denying anti-Semites. Its description of the Rizolis’ activities is absolutely heroic. http://archive.adl.org/nr/exeres/7f918ae0-1eeb-4037-b83a-46c92344a4a7,db7611a2-02cd-43af-8147-649e26813571,frameless.html
• During an October 2009 segment of his public access television show, which was aired during a primetime slot, Jim delivered a lengthy diatribe promoting Holocaust denial. He defended Holocaust denier and Iranian leader Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, instructed viewers to conduct their own research on the Holocaust to discover the ‘truth,’ and directed people to visit Web sites that advance Holocaust denial.
• Jim Rizoli has attempted to defend his statements about the Holocaust to the Boston Globe, which reported in November 2009 that he ‘believes…only around 300,000 people died, not six million, and that the majority were not killed but ‘died of sickness and disease.’’
• During the same segment of his public access television show, Jim Rizoli alleged the existence of a ‘Zionist controlled government,’ implying that Jews manipulate national and global institutions.
• Rizoli also claimed during the show that ‘a lot of the Jewish people are not going to be happy to hear this [referring to his recommendation to view videos that advance Holocaust denial] because this whole thing all stems upon Judaism [sic] and what happened with them.’ This is an anti-Semitic implication that Jews fabricate the Holocaust to advance their own agenda.
• Joe Rizoli has questioned the severity of the Holocaust on the Jews. During an interview with the MetroWest Daily News in February 2004, he argued, ‘What happened to the Jews was atrocious, but you know what? Nine million people in Germany died in Dresden and related incidents. They say 13 to 20 million people died in Russia.’ Rizoli went on to question, ‘Did the Holocaust happen? You define to me what the Holocaust is. I don’t know. There’s no letter or whatever that pinpoints Hitler saying it.’
• In 2004, Joe Rizoli signed an Internet petition supporting Ernst Zundel, who was fighting deportation to his home in Canada from the U.S., which he entered illegally. Reportedly, Rizoli became interested in Zundel after receiving a ‘ZGram,’ an E-mail that Zundel’s wife, also a Holocaust denier, sent to subscribers. Ironically for a xenophobe, Rizoli spoke out against Zundel’s deportation, which was the result of Zundel’s illegal entry into the U.S.
As they say, one man’s meat is another man’s poison. To those onto the Jewish scam of the Holocaust, these are all admirable achievements. But to Jews, ever the promoters of lies and false stories, Rizoli’s unflinching achievements are anathema.
‘We had a good following,’ Jim remembers. ‘We became like celebrities because we had the balls enough to talk about illegal immigrants. It opened up the door to talk about it in the whole state. Even the governor came and talked to us. And a Brazilian station put us on down there.’
‘Then I started getting into the Holocaust and even the immigration people were scared off,’ he remembers.
‘We took the most heat from then on. In 2010 we were banned by our cable station for a year for false allegations. We came back in 2011 with four shows. We were on 12 times a week.
‘We were pounding away at the Jews. It’s a wonder that they didn’t kill us.’
The cable company shut them down again in 2014.
‘Nobody would dare come on a show dealing with the Holocaust issue.’
Good fortune came Rizoli’s way about this time when he hooked up with Diane on Facebook and the pair have become teammates in a game most Americans are afraid to play — Holocaust revisionism.
What has gained Rizoli new found attention after years of battling the Jews in a beat up suburb of Boston now dominated by Brazilians is a series of YouTubes sketching the lives of famous historians who can tell the real story of World War II, which is not the one told in movies and on TV by paid shills who spout the bogus Jewish version of reality.
League of Extraordinary Revisionists
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCkhr7Ooo_lnt0NLW83Q2ovw
Be sure and check out the real heroes of the revisionist movement captured on film by JIm Rizoli.
These include, among many other luminaries, Fred Leuchter, author of the Leuchter Report that proved there were no gas chambers at Auschwitz; Robert Faurisson, the dean of Holocaust Revisionists who for more than a half century has been challenging the Jewish liars ‘to show me or draw me a picture of the gas chamber at Auschwitz’; Germar Rudolf, the German chemist jailed for his efforts at refining and reinforcing the evidence for the Holocaust hoax; and the late Bradley Smith, interviewed in the final months of his life after selfless decades of preaching historical sanity on college campuses with his Committee for Open Debate on the Holocaust.
In addition, there are many other controversial topics covered in ccfiile.com — Holocaust Liars and Holocaust Truthers, Auschwitz and Treblinka, AIPAC and the Slave Trade, witch trials and Rizoli Uncensored.
Among the many highlights are a riveting account of the fake Boston Marathon bombing and a Police file that explains how public officials are allowed to commit crimes and get away with them.
‘We’re not letting up,’ says Joe, then making this writer not mention an event they’re in the process of unleashing on the public.
‘It’s going to be a struggle forever,’ says JIm. ‘I don’t know how we’re going to do it (‘it’ being to get the public to accept the real story of what happened in World War II in Germany).
‘We just have to hang in there. We’re not looking to convert the world we’re just trying to get the word out.’
Rizoli is constantly emphasizing that ‘the Holocaust is the hub of what has gone wrong with the world.
‘But I love the fight. I’m not going down on my knees. If I go down I’m going to be standing up. You have to do what you know is right.’

Support JIm Rizoli’s important work by mail at
Jim Rizoli (LOER), 94 Pond St., Framingham MA 01702, 508-872-7292.
John Kaminski is a writer who lives on the Gulf Coast of Florida, constantly trying to figure out why we are destroying ourselves, and pinpointing a corrupt belief system as the engine of our demise. Solely dependent on contributions from readers, please support his work by mail: 6871 Willow Creek Circle #103, North Port FL 34287 USA.
http://therebel.is/kaminski
http://johnkaminski.info/
http://www.rudemacedon.ca/kaminski/kam-index.html
http://www.serendipity.li/john_kaminski_articles.htm
http://web.archive.org/web/20040323232319/http://johnkaminski.com/

{ Add a Comment }

B’nai Brith v. RadicalPress.com: Zionism’s Battle for Control of Canada’s Mind

Greetings Reader: The information contained in the article below, which is actually my response to the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal’s ‘offer’ to participate in a mediation process with Mr. Harvey Smarba and the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada, is of vital concern to all Canadians who take the issue of Internet Censorship seriously. As such I would strongly suggest that you do your utmost to assist me in moving this story/letter about the net in the most expedient manner possible. The next, and final stage of this Bolshevik Show Trial will be a ‘hearing’ by the CHR Tribunal which will take place within a month or two and likely conclude with a decision to try and shut down my website RadicalPress.com . Your help would be greatly appreciated.
Arthur Topham
Pub/Ed
RadicalPress.com

———————-

B’nai Brith v. RadicalPress.com: Zionism’s Battle for Control of Canada’s Mind

by Arthur Topham
January 28, 2009

Preface:

The following letter is a reply sent to Nancy Lafontant, Registry Officer and Gregory M. Smith, Registrar of the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal, a quasi-judicial federal agency now in the process of preparing for a Tribunal hearing regarding the complaint to the Canadian Human Rights Commission by Harvey Smarba and The League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada against RadicalPress.com.

The reply contains the argument put forth by RadicalPress.com owner and publisher Arthur Topham that this is a case of an intentional attack upon one of the last remaining alternative news network in Canada one willing to stand up to the Zionist-controlled media and the assorted Zionist Jewish lobby groups that hold way too much influence over Canada’s Judiciaries and governments, both federally and provincially.

The means being employed by B’nai Brith Canada is the infamous anti-hate law contained in the Canadian Human Rights Act and known as Sec. 13(1).

The RadicalPress.com publisher maintains that the Tribunal’s offer to ‘mediate’ is but a meaningless formality due to the fact than never in the history of the CHRC or the CHRT has a case been won by any of the numerous respondents who have been entrapped by this vile legal trap, one that NEVER allows the Truth to get in its way. NOT UNLESS OF COURSE YOU HAPPEN TO BE JEWISH AND PRO-ZIONIST!

The letter outlines much of the efforts by other victims of this Bolshevik bit of legislation as well as attempts by sane people across Canada to convince the federal government to toss this specious piece of pro-Zionist handiwork into the trash bin of history and at the same time dismantle all the Human Rights Commissions across Canada, be they provincial or federal. The dangers inherent in such quasi-judicial bodies has now become only too obvious at this stage of the game. [A.T.]

————————-
B’nai Brith v. RadicalPress.com: Zionism’s Battle for Control of Canada’s Mind

by Arthur Topham

January 28, 2009

To:
Nancy Lafontant
Registry Officer
And
Gregory M. Smith
Registrar

Registry Officer / Agent du greffe
Canadian Human Rights Tribunal / Tribunal canadien des droits de la personne

Ottawa, ON K1A 1J4/ Ottawa (Ontario) K1A 1J4
[email protected]
Telephone | Téléphone 613-947-1137
Facsimile | Télécopieur 613-995-3484
Teletypewriter | Téléimprimeur 613-563-6460
Government of Canada | Gouvernement du Canada

From:

Arthur Topham
Publisher/Editor
The Radical Press
4633 Barkerville Highway
Quesnel, B.C. V2J 6T8

January 28, 2009.

Dear Ms. Nancy Lafontant and Gregory M. Smith:

RE: Your Tribunal email letter of January 14, 2009 regarding,
Tribunal Harvey Smarba and The League for Human Rights of B’Nai Brith Canada v. Arthur Topham and RadicalPress.com
Your File: T1360/9008

Since receiving your email letter of January 14, 2009 I have given much serious thought and consideration to your ‘offer’ of mediation in the complaint filed by Mr. Harvey Smarba and The League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada against my person and my website http://www.radicalpress.com .

Contained in this somewhat lengthy reply you will find my response. Please bear in mind that what is written is done so in a spirit of honest, frank, open-minded and loving intent; designed to address and ultimately resolve in an abbreviated synopsis, the overall issue that is presently at stake in this case. Therefore, no remarks or comments of mine, regardless of their apparent harshness or levity are intended to offend, malign or denigrate any of the parties concerned, which includes the Tribunal and its members.

With respect to the entrapment legislation (which is how I interpret Sec. 13(1) of the CHR Act), whether or not there ever existed or does exist a case of its nature, wherein mediation has benefited the ‘Respondent’ at no cost to their principles, beliefs, integrity or rights I am unaware of it. Perhaps the recent one involving Harvey Smarba and The League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada v. Al Rycroft and www.PEJ.org (one set in tandem and paralleling my own) is an exception to this general rule but, not being privy to the details of said case as to whether or not any self-censorship was involved, I cannot make any definitive statement on it one way or another. I do know though that it was initiated by the same parties who have conjoined to bring about the complaint against myself and my website and that in the case of www.PEJ.org it was settled in favour of the respondent but what effect that case will have or has had upon the issue of the ultimate illegality of this specious Section of the Canadian Human Rights Act remains to be seen. It is one case shrouded in almost complete secrecy since the complaint was first laid.

What I am privy to though and acutely cognizant of, is the ultimate nature of this particular complaint and its intended purpose which, I contend, has nothing to do with the issue of ‘Hate’ or ‘anti-Semitism’ or ‘Racism’ or any of the other carefully crafted, misleading phrases and loaded terminology used by both the complainants and, tragically, your own departments within the Canadian Human Rights Commission (CHRC) and the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal (CHRT).

Obviously this issue deals with the primary, fundamental, God-given right, as contained within Canada’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms and elsewhere, to freedom of thought and speech as well as freedom of the media to publish whatever is deemed relevant as either news or views; barring of course all which currently falls within the legal parameters of Canada’s Libel laws and those whose related purpose is to prevent acts of malicious violence toward an individual or group and/or seditious acts against the government of Canada and its sovereign citizens.

As I have previously stated, both in my original Response to the CHRC Investigating officer ( http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=629 January 3, 2008 ) and in my Comments on the CHRC final Report ( see: http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=786 Sept 17/08 ), this is not a simple case of a person of ‘Jewish faith’ being personally maligned or threatened or libeled. Nor is a mundane example of some benign, benevolent society within the ranks of Canada’s multi-cultural social milieu being unduly criticized or picked on for spiteful or vexatious reasons. It is much more complex and convoluted and important, relatively speaking.

It has always been the contention of RadicalPress.com and myself, well before this case arose, that the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada is today a strongly political and vociferous pro-Zionist arm of the Mossad, the designated name for Israel’s unofficial spy network. As such its direct and full complicity with the state of Israel in their covert operations abroad and in its capacity as one of Israel’s most powerful lobby groups here in Canada, makes it de facto, an organization whose operations, both within Canada and without, are justifiably suspect and deserving of the most extreme scrutiny by the media, alternative or otherwise. I needn’t at this point go into any great detail surrounding the influence of this political lobbyist group here in Canada and its subsequent negative effect upon successive federal governments as per Canada’s role in supporting the racist, apartheid policies of the state of Israel.

As well, unlike the chain of litigations linked to former CHRC lawyer and investigator Ricardo Warmouse do to his seemingly endless quest to rid Canada of ‘Hate’, in whatever form it may manifest for him, this particular case involving Harvey Smarba and The League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada is specifically designed to censor and/or destroy a legally-registered, well-established publishing business known as The Radical Press a privately-owned entity which has been operating steadily since June of 1998 and now remains one of the very last, if not the last, alternative news sites in Canada. My guess would be that Harvey Smarba, the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada and the other Jewish lobby groups in Canada have the RadicalPress.com site posted high upon their ‘anti-Zionist endangered species’ hit list.

The reasons why the The League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada would set out to do such a thing are obvious to any impartial observer aware of the basic tenets underlying the political ideology known as Zionism. The ultimate intent of Zionism, for those unaware of it (and I must include your two departments in this assessment as well), is to subvert all sovereign governments around the world, be they democratic, socialist, fascist or communist and to draw their respective leaders into Zionism’s gigantic web of deceit; one which always tends to benefit the state of Israel. As such, its objectives pose a clear and present danger to the democratic foundation upon which Canada’s government and its social and cultural infrastructure are based.

It was for these reasons that I took it upon myself, as a dedicated, concerned, patriotic and responsible citizen of Canada to expose the disingenuous machinations of this subversive agency; one that attempts to impose itself falsely upon Canadian society as merely a ‘benevolent’ society with little more than a pious intent to assist its membership. In actual fact it is a critical component of a foreign spy network working within that context as a double agent for the state of Israel. As such it should be registered in Ottawa as a foreign lobby group rather than feigning a false ‘Canadian’ face to hide its true countenance and purpose. I say this because any Canadian, who holds their allegiance to Canada first and foremost, would not have the temerity, to accuse their fellow Canadians of spreading ‘hatred toward citizens of Israel’ in the event of any critical commentary aimed at that foreign country.

Nothing more strikingly hideous and shameful for Canada could have occurred to highlight this conviction of mine than the recent slaughter and maiming of thousands of innocent men, women and children in the Palestinian region of Gaza by the Israeli government’s military forces. Canada’s response to this immoral and illegal act of sadistic aggression against a defenseless, beleaguered people was cruelly and graphically revealed in the decision by the Harper Conservative government to give Canada’s full and unqualified support to Israel in its inhumane and unacceptable destruction of Gaza’s people and its infrastructure as clearly shown by the vote in the U.N. regarding an urgent plea for a ceasefire. Canada, ONLY Canada, to the utmost humiliation of its once good name and its moral standing in the world, rather than standing up for Truth and Justice and Freedom and the democratic ideals it professes to believe in, instead prostrated itself before the warlike foreign nation of Israel like some dumb and terrified servant. As a Canadian who fervently believes in his country and its global impression upon the rest of the world; one shown by example, I found this overt act of abject obeisance to the Israeli state to be one of the most disgusting events ever witnessed in my 62 years on this planet.

In terms of my original contention therefore, it is but one more vivid example of how political organizations such as The League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada and the Canadian Jewish Congress (CJC) and the Simon Weisenthal Center (SWC) and other Jewish lobby groups conspire (yes, sadly for some, it is a conspiracy of the highest order and not a mere theory) to use their powerful lobbying positions to influence the moral and legal decisions of Canada’s duly elected representatives so that subsequent actions which reflect upon the whole of Canada’s reputation as a peace-loving nation are subverted to the degrading partisan purposes of an alien, foreign nation; one now recognized by numbers of nations as being highly racist, apartheid, undemocratic and an imminent threat to global peace.

For emphasis once again I will reiterate the fact that this is why Harvey Smarba, acting as B.C.’s ‘agent’ for the Mossad-controlled League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada has been given the job of destroying RadicalPress.com. It is so that news and opinions contained on my website which focus upon and expose this precise issue of the dangers of Zionism to Canadian sovereignty are censored from the eyes of Canadians or anyone else outside of Canada having access to the internet.

I would also submit (once again, and as stated in my Response and Comments see above), that such was the original intent by these and other Jewish lobby groups here in Canada, when they set about creating Canada’s Human Rights Commissions which ultimately gave birth to the odious Sec. 13(1) of the CHR Act.

After the dreadful murder of three thousand American and some Canadian and other foreign citizens in the attack upon the World Trade Center September 11, 2001 evidence quickly began emerging which linked the activities of the Mossad to the event thus incriminating Israel in what now is generally accepted as being the first major false flag event of the 21st Century. In order to, but not limited as such, prevent further evidence from gaining currency around the world, Canada, within three months, quickly drew up its Anti-terrorism Act, 2001, c.41, amending the Criminal Code ostensibly to ‘combat terrorism’. Such, I suggest, was not the only intent of said legislation. In retrospect it also proved to be the precise window required by these anti-democratic, anti-free speech agents of Israel to sneak in, as per their usual subterfuge, Sec. 13(1) into the CHR Act.

Having observed, measured and covered for the past 11 years, covert activities of various nations in greater detail than the average Canadian, it is obvious to me that such a vile, specious piece of legislation, ONLY benefits the pro-Israel and pro-Zionist Jews, their Lobby, their controlled, monopoly Media and their assorted crypto-aspirants and by association identifies all of these entities with the pro-racist and pro-apartheid policies of the Israeli government. It certainly hasn’t, by any stretch of the imagination, benefitted any of the other numerous cases of non-Jews who have already been convicted under this draconian piece of legislation.

These preliminary remarks said I would now like to touch upon some other relevant Sec. 13(1) cases and related initiatives pertinent to my case before concluding this letter.

Paramount throughout the struggle to have Sec. 13(1) erased forever from the statute books of Canada has been the long and tireless effort by Mr. Marc Lemire and his lawyer Barbara Kulaszka. On November 25, 2005, they filed a constitutional challenge against Sec. 13 (see constitutional challenge of Section 13 internet censorship) http://www.stopsection13.com and Section 54 (one imposing hefty fines) of the Canadian Human Rights Act. That legal challenge dragged on in the courts until September 15-17, 2008 until final submissions were heard at a three day hearing (see: http://www.freedomsite.org/legal/Closing_submissions_constitutional-part_1.html ). A decision by the court is still pending as I write.

The case of the Jewish lawyer and former publisher of the now-defunct Western Standard magazine out of Alberta, Ezra Levant, was another example wherein the Alberta Human Rights Commission had laid charges of illegal ‘discrimination’ against Levant based upon a complaint by the Edmonton Council of Muslim Communities; one related to Levant’s publication in 2006 of the infamous Danish cartoons which were designed to denigrate the Muslim prophet Mohammed. That complaint finally concluded August 6th, 2008 with an acquittal. Levant afterwards, in a column in the National Post, told readers that, unlike the other case of Reverend Stephen Boissoin, another victim of the AHRC who was fined $7,000 and banned for life from giving sermons or even sending private e-mails that were ‘disparaging’ toward homosexuals, Levant’s case was dropped in his favour due to his contention that he had been, ‘a political pain in the neck for the HRC.’ That statement, I suggest, is both false and misleading and I maintain that the real reason why Levant was acquitted was because of the fact that he is Jewish and a supporter of the Zionist ideology.

Another example of my premise that only Jews escape the censor’s noose in Canada came soon after Mr. Lemire’s courageous constitutional challenge to Sec. 13. This one involved a provincial version of hate speech law stemming from B.C. and concerned Canadian journalist Mark Steyn and Maclean’s magazine. It concluded on October 10, 2008 with the decision that Steyn and Maclean’s had not violated B.C.’s hate speech law. Again, the point to bear in mind here is that Steyn’s case was not brought on by any of the Jewish lobby groups mentioned above but by the Canadian Islamic Congress. And, as in the case of Ezra Levant, Steyn, also being a Jew as well as a zealous, self-admitted Zionist, escaped the usual fate of non-Jewish respondents.

Next came the federal Conservative party’s policy convention in Winnipeg in November of 2008 at which time an overwhelming majority of delegates voted in favour of a resolution (P-203) to repeal Section 13 (Internet censorship provision) of the Canadian Human Rights Act. Even Canada’s Minister of Justice, Rob Nicholson voted in favor of P-203. Of course the media were quick to point out that such resolutions are not binding upon the Prime Minister and so thus far, for all the rhetoric and hype in the Zionist media and the right/left blogosphere, no definite actions have been taken to fulfill the aspirations of this majority of delegates. This of course is not meant as a slight upon the obviously sincere delegates themselves but only highlights the fact that in party politics it is the leaders and not the membership who ultimately make the final decisions.

In the immediate wake of Resolution P-203 came once again the renewed efforts of Liberal MP Keith Martin of B.C. (Esquimalt—Juan de Fuca) who had initially put forth a resolution in Parliament calling for the removal of Sec. 13 from the CHR Act back in March of 2008. On November 19, 2008 Dr. Martin introduced two new motions, M-153 and M-156. The first, M-153 states: ‘That, in the opinion of the House, subsection 13(1) of the Canadian Human Rights Act should be deleted from the Act.’ In the second, M-156, the motion states, ‘That, in the opinion of the House, the government should hold public hearings as part of a review of the Canadian Human Rights Act, the Canadian Human Rights Commission and its tribunal.’

To date, to my knowledge, no concrete action has been forthcoming with respect to these two motions.

There are other examples, too many to include here. According to Catholic Insight magazine http://catholicinsight.com/ ‘On June 17, 2008, the Canadian Human Rights Commission (CHRC) launched its own policy review of Section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act (CHRA). Section 13 (added to the Act in 2001) gives the commission the power to investigate and punish instances of ‘hate speech’ on the internet. The 59-page review, conducted by Prof. Richard Moon, an expert on constitutional law and free speech at the University of Windsor, was made public at a cost of over $1,000 a page on November 24, 2008 and is posted on the CHRC website.’ See http://www.chrc-ccdp.ca

Surprisingly, to free speech advocates as well as to the CHRC, Prof. Richard Moon recommended ‘That Section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act be repealed so that the CHRC and the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal (CHRT) no longer deal with hate speech, especially hate speech on the internet.’ The immediate reaction of the CHRC was to go into a state of denial and thus far we have not seen any significant movement on this recommendation.

Catholic Insight, a magazine out of Ontario, Canada, also a victim of charges of discrimination brought on by a peculiar species of complainant known as ‘homo-harasimus‘, also gives us additional examples of similar harassment by the CHRC. As Catholic Insight states, ‘The list of those who have unjustifiably suffered under Canada’s human rights system which Justice Minister Nicholson has described in a letter to C.I. as ’second to none’ is a long and varied one: B.C. teacher Chris Kempling; the Knights of Columbus in B.C.; Calgary Bishop Fred Henry; Alberta Pastor Stephen Boissoin; Saskatchewan’s Hugh Owens and marriage commissioner Orville Nichols; Ezra Levant in Calgary; the Christian Horizons ministry to the disabled in Ontario; Mark Steyn and Maclean’s magazine in Toronto; the mayors of a dozen Canadian cities who have been forced to proclaim ‘gay pride’ days; the FreeDominion.ca website, and more.’

You can include me and RadicalPress.com in the ‘more’ category, one which is reserved for the ‘more’ dangerous, threatening offenders such as Malcolm Ross, Terry Long, Doug Collins, the notorious non-neo-Nazi Paul Fromm and of course Canada’s ultimate shame Ernst Zundel a man who now rots away in a German prison cell thanks to the egregious machinations of the CHRC and Canada’s Zionist-controlled federal Judiciary.

To conclude:

One would think that after all that has occurred over the last few years regarding these Bolshevik ‘Show Trials’ disguised as Human Rights Tribunal hearings, that all of this would be self-evident to any intelligent person who was in a position to judge the merits of such cases. But unfortunately, logic, reason, intelligence and unbiased, objective thinking, coupled (as in my particular case), with a basic knowledge of the nature of political Zionism, do not appear to be qualities evident either within the CHRC or the CHRT. Otherwise this case would never have progressed to the stage that it now has. Instead of reason and common sense prevailing these two organizations, who have legitimately earned the ignominy of the majority of freedom-loving Canadians, continue to plod incessantly onward toward their ultimate demise seemingly oblivious to the realities that surround their robotic, immoral and unjust movements, all the while crushing more and more innocent people and organizations beneath their blundering, censorship bound Juggernaut.

And so, all that said, this brings me back to my reasons for the decision that I have made with respect to your request for a ‘yes or no’ regarding mediation with the complainants in my case. Bluntly put, (for there really is no other simple way of stating it) there is not a snowball’s chance in Hell that Harvey Smarba or The League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada would agree to any form of mediation that didn’t require RadicalPress.com agreeing to remove all its controversial articles deemed ‘hateful’ toward ‘Jews or citizens of Israel’. That is not the mandate given Harvey Smarba by the Mossad and as such it precludes any real chance of holding reasonable discussions on the matter. But even if this were the case, at this stage of the game of censorship I have long concluded that to consent in any way or fashion to the imperious demands and whims of the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada would be demeaning to myself as a patriotic Canadian and a man of integrity and a total betrayal of every principle that I’ve held dear for the vast portion of my adult life.

And so as I stated initially I did give a lot of careful consideration to my decision. I have also been given advice by others who are themselves involved in this same battle with the CHRC over Sec. 13(1) suggesting to me that should I agree to such a process, if for no other reason, it might prove advantageous in the final outcome by possibly lessening any sentencing or subsequent fine that might be imposed (just to add injury to insult). I deliberated over that possibility but concluded that morally, reasonably and spiritually it would not be a legitimate reason to subject myself to a process that must inevitably, due to its inherent internal flaws, prove futile.

Besides that it would mean agreeing to having to travel from my home up in central British Columbia, a distance of approximately 600 + km, during the winter, to attend a one-day mediation session that is predestined to fail from the start. For Harvey Smarba it’s a short trip across the strait from Victoria, B.C. and back, albeit with ferry costs, to attend the meeting and for the Tribunal member from your offices a nice, likely first class flight from Ottawa to Vancouver with all expenses paid and replete with a fancy hotel room in the West End and likely some gourmet dining and night life activity in between, all paid for by me and the rest of Canada’s taxpaying public. A tough job indeed for you I know but hey, someone has to do it I suppose for the sake of the freedom and liberty of special interest groups here in Canada determined to duct-tape the mouths of its citizens into silence and submission to Israeli interests.

I am 62 years of age. I run a seasonal business doing carpentry that ends abruptly come freeze up in the fall and doesn’t begin again until well into May when the snows recedes. In other words for about 6 months of the year I must survive on the profits of about 5 months steady employment and then for the remainder of the winter survive on a $300/month early pension payment. It hardly leaves vast extraneous sums of cash for long distance travel, hotels, meals and possible mechanical failures, let alone the hiring of any legal help. But then you are likely already well aware of this fact so I suppose I’m merely repeating myself here.

So no, I’m going to have to decline your offer of going to Vancouver even though the escape from a frozen landscape for a day or two of temperate rainforest climate would otherwise be a welcome change from the ice and snow and wood splitting.

Furthermore, had I agreed to mediation it would have been on the condition that your Tribunal member and Harvey Smarba both make the trek up to the supposed ‘scene of the crime’ and that you hold your mediation and/or your hearing in Quesnel, B.C., a location both the closest and most convenient location for me. Never forget for a moment please that it was the complainant Harvey Smarba and The League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada who instigated these spurious charges to begin with. That, in my mind, makes him and his organization responsible for coming to where they believe the supposed ‘hate crime’ was committed and face, like decent men, their accused.

Surely you ought to be able to see the soundness of my proposal. Had the mediation occurred your Tribunal member would then have had to assume the additional burden of taking a small twin-engine jet service up to Quesnel and settle for a one to three day stay in one of our local hotels or motels; facilities which offer the weary traveler their own small but earnest effort at duplicating the finest of accommodations that Vancouver has to offer. I would also have suggested some good warm woolies and a toque and warm mittens for your member. Even fleece is acceptable in this sometimes rough and tumble area of the province inhabited mostly by red-neck ranchers, loggers, miners and other assorted misfits and outlaws`. You might also have had to let the member know that weather conditions could delay their flight in and out and that he or she should allow for a few days extra time in either arriving or leaving.

So you see that in fact there is a silver lining to it all. By not agreeing to mediation I will be saving Canadian taxpayers the additional expense of flying one of your members out to B.C. As well, it will save the complainant any added costs in traveling from Victoria to Vancouver and back.

As a final kick at the cat and as a parting tribute to Canada’s foremost political prisoner Ernst Zundel, I would like to share with you a short, yet poignant anecdote, one which relates to my own case and the decision I have made respecting the proposed mediation.

During the Moscow Show trials of Lenin and Stalin (which I’m sure you are all well versed in) and also during the trials of post-war Germans at Nuremberg, a prosecutorial ploy was invariably used to silence all debate and discussion that might include actual facts and verifiable proofs or truths that might have vindicated the testimony of the victims. It became know as the principle of ‘Manifest Obviousness’ and came in very handy during the show trials of German soldiers and civilians held responsible for alleged ‘war crimes’ and the alleged ‘holocaust’ of the ‘6 million’ Jews during the war. Whenever any counter evidence arose that in any way challenged the newly-coined allegations of ‘holocaust’ and ‘gas chambers’ and ‘war crimes’ the judge would resort to using the expression ‘Manifest Obviousness’ as the final counter to any argument that the court was unable to justify with verifiable evidence. In many ways it resembles the current ploy of the CHRC and its Investigators and Tribunal with their use of the term, ‘Hallmarks of Hate’ to lend official, legal credence to an unproven set of assumptions that possess no foundation in the real world. Therefore, in the spirit of Nuremberg I would have to state that it is manifestly obvious that all of your efforts to impose legal sanctions against Canadians based upon Section 13(1) of the CHR Act are unjustifiable and venal in the worse possible sense of the term. This therefore leaves no doubt in my mind that both the Canadian Human Rights Commission and the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal should be immediately relieved of any and all power to adjudicate any matter of Canadian jurisprudence whatsoever. I say this as a concerned Canadian, a Christian and a man of principle.

Let us therefore drop the pretension of justice and proceed to the next stage of this mock trial of a free and independent Canadian. On with the show! Let the Tribunal hearing begin! (But again, please bear in mind that I would expect you to hold it in Quesnel, B.C.)

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Shine your Light for Love & Peace & Justice for All,

Arthur Topham
Pub/Ed
The Radical Press
Canada’s Radical News Network
[email protected]
http://www.radicalpress.com
‘Digging to the root of the issues since 1998’

{ Add a Comment }

The Case Against Noahide Law

rainbow_court1

ED Noor: Americans in their current Islamophobic fervor seem to be terrified of the imposition of Shariah Law upon the nation. They are completely unaware that their nation has already been sold over and that their American legal system has been hijacked by the Talmudics and that their once Napoleonic judicial system has been altered into a truly ‘jewdicial system’.
‘On October 16th [2004], president Bush signed into law the global anti-semitism review act, designed to force the entire world into never being critical of the Jews, whatever their actions.
‘This act establishes a special department within the United States state department to monitor global anti-semitism, which is to report annually to congress.
‘This act defines a person as being anti-semitic if they purport any of the following beliefs:
~ Any assertion, ‘that the Jewish community controls government, the media, international business and the financial world.’
~ The expression of, ‘strong anti-Israel sentiment.’
~ Expressing, ‘virulent criticism,’ of Israel’s leaders, past or present. The state department gives an example of this occurring when a swastika is portrayed in a cartoon decrying the behaviour of a past or present Zionist leader.
~ Any criticism of the Jewish religion or its religious leaders or literature with the emphasis on the Talmud and Kabbalah.
~ Any criticism of the United States government and congress for being under undue influence by the Jewish Zionist community, which would include Jewish organisations such as American-Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC).
~ Any criticism of the Jewish-Zionist community for promoting globalism or what some call the, ‘New World Order.’
~ Placing any blame on Jewish leaders and their followers for inciting the Roman crucifixion of Christ.
~ Citing any facts that could in any way diminish the, ‘six million,’ figure of holocaust victims.
~ Claiming that Israel is a racist state.
~ Making any claim that there exists a, ‘Zionist conspiracy.’
~ Offering proof that Jews and their leaders created communism and the bolshevik revolution in Russia.
~ Making, ‘derogatory statements about Jewish persons.’
~ Asserting that spiritually disobedient Jews do not have the biblical right to re-occupy Palestine.
~ Making any allegations of Mossad involvement in the 9/11 attack.
And now, let us get into the nitty gritty of the Noahide Laws, something this blog has been exposing for several years now.
‘All Israelites will have a part in the future world. The Goyim, at the end of the world will be handed over to the angel Duma and sent down to hell’. ~ Zohar, Shemoth, Toldoth Noah, Lekh-Lekha .
PUBLIC LAW 102-14 AND THE NOAHIDE LAWS
Public Law 102-14 is an American Federal law which states that the ‘Seven Noahide Laws’ (Jewish Laws from the Talmud) are the principle on which the United States was founded and that it is the responsibility of America to transmit these ‘ethical values’ to future generation both in the United States and the world. But what are these so-called ‘ethical values’ known as the ‘Seven Noahide Laws’ and what implications do they have for non-Jews?
http://www.noahidelaw.org/why-repeal-public-law-102-14-and-noahide-law/
index
PUBLIC LAW 102-14 HONORS ANTI-GENTILE RABBI
Public Law 102-14 not only states that the Seven Noahide Laws are the principles upon which the American Nation was founded, it also honors Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson of the Lubavitch Movement (also known as Chabad) as being a ‘great spiritual leader’. According to Rabbi Schneerson, the Noahide Laws are to be kept by force if possible and if not by ‘pleasantness and peace’. This same Rabbi also stated that non-Jews are inferior to Jews, saying that they have ‘satanic souls’ and their lives are worth nothing except as service to Jews. Why would the USA honor such a Rabbi who preaches the most militant form of Noahide Law and who obviously hates non-Jews?
ED Noor: ‘It is our duty to force all mankind to accept the seven Noahide laws, and if not ~ they will be killed.’ ~ Rabbi Yitzhak Ginsburg
http://www.noahidelaw.org/public-law-102-14-honor-anti-gentile-rabbi/
‘THE DIVINE CODE’ AND THE CHIEF RABBIS OF ISRAEL
After learning about Public Law 102-14 and the Noahide Laws, discriminatory Jewish religious laws which threaten freedom of religion, freedom of speech and sexual expression in the United States and the world, we wanted to learn a little more about modern Jewish opinion on this matter. We are fortunate because in 2008 a book on Noahide Law was published in Jerusalem entitled ‘The Divine Code’. Better still, the book was reviewed by the Chief Rabbinate of Israel. Let’s see what ‘The Divine Code’ and the Chief Rabbis have to say about Noahide Law.
http://www.noahidelaw.org/the-divine-code-and-the-chief-rabbis-of-israel/
AV10
NOAHIDE LAW, THE PHARISEES & THE BABYLONIAN TALMUD
American Public Law 102-14 enshrines the ‘Seven Noahide Laws’ as the ‘ethical values’ upon which the United States was founded. The law also asserts that it is the nation’s ‘responsibility’ to transmit these ‘ethical values’ to the generations of the future. We read in the 1906 Jewish Encyclopedia that under these laws, those who practice other faiths, blaspheme against Judaism or commit ‘adultery’ are to be punished by death and that non-Jews are commanded to set up ‘courts of justice’ to judge the masses upon these laws. It would also seem that the Chief Rabbis of Israel also support the Noahide Laws being commanded upon non-Jews from their blessings upon the 2008 book ‘The Divine Code‘. But where did these ideas about Noahide Law come from? Noahide Law is not some bizarre aberration of Judaism, it is fundamental and central to Jewish cannon. In which Jewish holy book can we find the Noahide Laws? To answer these questions, we need to learn a little about the most important of all Jewish scriptures, The Babylonian Talmud.
http://www.noahidelaw.org/noahide-law-the-pharisees-and-the-babylonian-talmud/
NOAHIDE LAW (Public Law 102-14) WAS PASSED BY ONLY FOUR CONGRESSMEN
Many American find it hard to believe that congress would pass Public Law 102-14 (The Noahide Laws) if they were truly detrimental to the freedoms of non-Jews. Aren’t most people in congress non-Jewish? Why would they pass a law that was against their own interests? According to former congressman Bill Dannemyer (this is not an endorsement of him), Public Law 102-14 was passed on the vote of only four congressmen, when 99% of congress was absent. If his testimony and the testimony of his wife Dr. Day (again, not an endorsement) are accurate, then 99% of congress never voted on Public Law 102-14. Why was such an important proclamation passed with the consent of only 1% of congress?
ED Noor: By Congressman Dannemyer serving at the time. An excellent read. Basically they passed this using the same conniving methods they utilized when signing the Federal Reserve Act back in 1903.
NOW THE GOVERNMENT CAN LEGALLY KILL CHRISTIANS
http://www.takebackourrights.org/docs/Christians-full%20page.html
http://www.noahidelaw.org/noahide-law-public-law-102-14-was-passed-by-only-four-congressmen/
guillo
IAJL AND COLPA, NOAHIDE LAW AND TALMUDIC EXECUTION IN THE USA
Ever since the Jewish Talmudic Noahide Laws were introduced into the American legal system back in 1991, some members of the Jewish legal community have been using deceptive practices and outright lies to introduce Jewish Talmudic Laws into the Supreme Court, particularly in the area of capital punishment and execution law. Execution is a legal issue of importance to those seeking to implement Noahide Law in the United States since Noahide Law calls for the decapitation of anyone who practices ‘idolatry’ (which includes Christianity) or blasphemes the Jewish god. Here we will briefly discuss which organizations are infiltrating the Supreme Court, preparing it for the acceptance of Talmudic Law and how they are deceiving the public into accepting Talmudic execution laws (particularly decapitation) in the United States.
http://www.noahidelaw.org/iajlj-and-copla-noahide-law-and-talmudic-execution-in-the-usa/
MJ+2015+Noahide+Jewish+Shariah+7
ED Noor: Bush Jr. Signing this infamous duplicitous law which had nothing to do with education and everything to do with signing in the Rebbe’s dream of establishing the Noahide Laws in America.
This photo provided by the Supreme Court shows President Bush, left, meeting with members of the Supreme Court during the investiture ceremony of Chief Justice John Roberts, second from right, in the Chief Justice’s Conference Room at the court in Washington, Monday, Oct. 3, 2005. From left are, the president, Justices John Paul Stevens, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, David Souter, Antonin Scalia, Roberts, and Justice Sandra Day O’Connor. (AP Photo/Ken Heinen, Pool)
This photo provided by the Supreme Court shows President Bush, left, meeting with members of the Supreme Court during the investiture ceremony of Chief Justice John Roberts, second from right, in the Chief Justice’s Conference Room at the court in Washington, Monday, Oct. 3, 2005. From left are, the president, Justices John Paul Stevens, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, David Souter, Antonin Scalia, Roberts, and Justice Sandra Day O’Connor. (AP Photo/Ken Heinen, Pool)
US PRESIDENT AND SUPREME COURT JUSTICES PRAISE JEWISH LAW
The Jews of America and Zionist Israel have not been satisfied with simply enshrining their supremacist, virulent and dangerous Noahide Laws into the United States government via Public Law 102-14. They have been working steadily to further encroach their Talmudic hegemony into the US, and they have won over our Presidents and Supreme Court Justices.
On November 5th, 2002 a Kosher dinner was held at the Supreme Court to celebrate the launch of the International Institute for Judaic Law (IIJL) [currently defunct]. This kosher dinner was attended by three of the Supreme Court Justice, Ruth Bader Ginsberg, Stephen Breyer, and Antonin Scalia, some of whom provided their letters of approval to the founder of the institute, Chabad-Lubavitch Rabbi Dr. Noson Gurary. President George W. Bush also sent his greetings and approval for the institute and Jewish Law.
One of the stated purposes of IIJL was to promote the application of Jewish Law and Philosophy in contemporary society. The Jewish Noahide Laws and Philosophy of the Talmud are inherently biased against non-Jews, promoting their general second-class citizenship and even extermination, so why is the President of the USA and Supreme Court giving credence to such an Jewish supremacist legal system?
http://www.noahidelaw.org/us-president-and-supreme-court-justices-praise-jewish-law/
christian-zionism-israel-1024×6111-604×2701
NOAHIDE LAW…BUT ISN’T ISRAEL SECULAR?
When Americans learn about Public Law 102-14 and the Noahide Laws, many are quick to dismiss the threat because ‘Israel is a secular nation’ and would never push for religious laws… how far this is from the truth!
Today, Jews and their supporters drum the misconception that Israel is a ‘secular sate’. Israel is a ‘Jewish sate’, a Zionist state, a religious state and this is very obvious from Israel’s legal system. The nation of Israel has no constitution, on purpose, because this would force the nation to choose between ‘secularism’ and halacha (Jewish Law). Israel does however have state appointed and funded Rabbis and Rabbinical Courts. The Rabbis of Israel have gained control of and have implemented religious law in the sectors of marriage, divorce and adoption and are seeking to develop greater influence over the nation’s military and education sectors. A nation which does not have a constitution of secularism but does have state religious figures with legal powers is not a ‘secular state’; it is a pseudo-theocracy at best. Surprisingly, recent polls have suggested that support for Halacha law over democracy is very high within the nation of Israel.
http://www.noahidelaw.org/noahide-law-but-isnt-israel-secular/
IT IS NOT ‘ANTI-SEMITIC’ TO CRITICIZE NOAHIDE LAW
When criticizing the international Jewish legal system known as Noahide Law (Public Law 102-14 in America), one is often accused of being ‘anti-Semitic’. To call someone an ‘anti-Semite’ implies they have issues with ‘Semitic’ people, and thus you are equating them with being something akin to a racist. It can be stated that Noahide Law is just that, a law, and so opposing this law is no less ‘racist’ than opposing Islamic Sharia law or Communism. A legal text is not a group or people, it is not an ethnicity, and it is not a race, so to oppose it cannot be ‘anti-Semitic’. However, there is a deeper question that needs to be answered here, are Jew’s really a race or ethnicity? When we look at modern laws in Israel, Jewish theology, and claims by modern Jewish geneticists, we can see that Judaism has been conflated with ‘Semitism’, they are not the same thing.
Criticism of Noahide Law and Judaism in general has nothing to do with hatred for any race or ethnicity, it has to do with opposing deleterious ideology, nothing more, nothing less.
http://www.noahidelaw.org/is-it-anti-semitic-to-criticize-noahide-law/
20130825184536742
CHRISTIANS UNDER NOAHIDE LAW
When many Christian learn about Noahide Law and the Talmud, they wrongly believe that the injunctions against ‘heathens’ do not apply to them. Little do Christians know that according to Jewish Law, to be Christian is worse than being a ‘heathen’ since Christians are considered ‘heretics’ and ‘apostates’. Indeed, according to the Talmud, becoming Christian is one of the worst sins one can commit, and Jesus himself is harshly admonished for being a sorcerer, blasphemer and a whore monger.
http://www.noahidelaw.org/christians-under-noahide-law/
starofdavidgay1
LGBTQ UNDER NOAHIDE LAW
ED Noor: The seven Noahide laws, as traditionally enumerated are:
Do Not Deny God
Do Not Blaspheme God
Do Not Murder
Do Not Engage in Incestuous, Adulterous or Homosexual Relationships
Do Not Steal
Do Not Eat of a Live Animal
Establish Courts/Legal System to Ensure Law Obedience
Should the LGBTQ community be worried about Public Law 102-14 and the Jewish Noahide Laws? Absolutely. According to traditional interpretations of Noahide Law, the law against ‘adultery’ includes homosexuality, and like adulterers, homosexuals would be killed under Noahide Law. The Talmud is full of commands to kill homosexuals, classing them with persons who have sex with animals.
Non-Jews accused of homosexuality could be executed at any time in a Noahide court upon the testimony of one witness and upon the verdict of just one judge; Jews on the other hand would need two witnesses to their ‘crime’ of homosexuality and could not be executed unless they were brought before a panel of 71 judges (the Sanhedrin). Further, some Rabbis of the Talmud make prejudicial assumptions, stating that Jews are generally not thought to practice homosexuality, thus providing Jews with a biased favor before the court. Talmudic Law obviously has an inherent bias against non-Jews who have been accused of this so-called ‘sin’ and non-Jewish LGBTQs are obviously in greater danger of persecution under Noahide Law than Jewish LGBTQs.
http://www.noahidelaw.org/lgbtq-under-noahide-law/
‘ADULTERY’ UNDER NOAHIDE LAW, ONLY A CRIME FOR WOMEN?
Adultery is a ‘crime’ under Jewish Noahide Law, one for which non-Jews are to be decapitated. But what is the Jewish definition of adultery? Many might be surprised to learn that under usual circumstance, only a woman can be accused of adultery under Jewish Law, while Jewish men are free to engage in extramarital sex and keep sex slaves, even having sex with non-Jewish infants as young as three years old.
Meanwhile, woman only accused of adultery were stripped naked and put on public display during the Talmudic times. Are these the type of ‘morals’ we want in the USA (Public Law 102-14) or around the world? While many will point to the fact that such practices are not taking place today, according to Halachic material, this is only because current Israeli society has been corrupted by foreign influence (as during Roman times), something that Noahide advocates are working to correct.
http://www.noahidelaw.org/adultery-under-noahide-law-only-a-crime-for-women/
kings_torah
MURDER UNDER NOAHIDE LAW, BUT WHAT COUNTS AS MURDER?
One of the Seven Noahide Laws is ‘do not murder’; who could disagree with that? Well, it depends on your definition of murder. According to the Jewish Law of the Talmud, there is no penalty for killing a person indirectly, thus Jewish law provides provisions for killing others (even other Jews) via starvation, exposure, suffocation, and more. But, this principle only applies to Jews. Non-Jews who commit these same crimes are sentenced to death. Noahide Law (Public Law 102-14) is inherently biased in favor of Jews, and resembles nothing close to what would be considered common morality or ethics.
ED Noor: Read about The King’s Torah, a modern Israeli publication by several prominent rabbis.
THE UGLY FACE OF THE ZIONIST JIHAD
http://snippits-and-slappits.blogspot.ca/2010/04/yitzhak-shapira-fanatical-zionist-rabbi_02.html
http://www.noahidelaw.org/murder-under-noahide-law-but-what-counts-as-murder/
madadlld
NOAHIDE LAW AGAINST THEFT…JEWS CAN STEAL FROM NON-JEWS
One of the Seven Noahide Laws from the Jewish Talmud is ‘Do Not Steal’. That sounds pretty reasonable right? But did you know that according to the Talmud Jews are given full permission to steal from non-Jews? And don’t forget, Jews are not prosecuted for stealing small amounts of money, but non-Jews are.
http://www.noahidelaw.org/noahide-law-against-theft-jew-can-steal-from-non-jews/
150717_sanhedrin
Members of the modern Sanhedrin in Israel.
NOAHIDE JUDGES, UPHOLDING ‘THEOCRATIC LAW’
The seventh and final law of the Seven Noahide Laws (Public Law 102-14) is to ‘appoint courts of justice’. But what kind of American courts would uphold Jewish law? According to the reputable Jewish legal source, the Mishneh Torah (aka Rambam) written by the famous Jewish scholar Maimonides, non-Jews are to set up ‘theocratic courts’ whose judges are learned in ‘Torah’ and who do no ‘pervert’ the law with secular logic.
Non-Jews who fail to set up theocratic Jewish courts in their nations are subjected to mass execution. If this were not enough, it may (or may not) be required for non-Jews to appoint theocratic kings among themselves who will ensure that the nation is upholding Noahide Law. The United States was founded upon the principle of separation of Church and State, so what is such a law as Public Law 102-14 doing in our federal legal system?
http://www.noahidelaw.org/noahide-judges-upholding-theocratic-law/
THE NOAHIDE LAW AGAINST ‘IDOLATRY’ PROHIBITS MUCH MORE THAN JUST BOWING BEFORE STONE
The very first of The Seven Jewish Noahide Laws (American Public Law 102-14) is ‘No Idolatry’. Well most people don’t bow before graven images, so does it really matter if such practices are outlawed? ‘Idolatry’ under Jewish Noahide Law encompasses much much more than simply banning people from bowing before statues.
According to Jewish legal scholars, to avoid ‘idolatry’, one must:
~ accept Jewish Torah;
~ accept Jewish prophets and teachers;
~ and give obedience to Jewish courts.
~ Also, one must not accept non-Jewish scriptures;
~ not follow non-Jewish prophets or priests.
All non-Jewish religious temples and paraphernalia are to be destroyed and any attempts to proselytize a non-Jewish religion will lead to execution. In addition, under the Noahide Law which abolishes ‘idolatry’, non-Jews can be executed for doing something as simple as consulting astrologers or getting a tattoo. Finally, non-Jews are commanded to not love those who practice idolatry and to even hate them.
http://www.noahidelaw.org/the-noahide-law-against-idolatry-prohibit-much-more-than-just-bowing-before-stone/
jewish+racism8
jewish-racism-chosen
NOAHIDE LAW MAY HAVE RACIST UNDERTONES
ED Noor: ‘MAY’ have racist UNDERtones!? See images above.
Public Law 102-14 in the United States and the Jewish Noahide Laws are of concern to all non-Jews. The Noahide Laws are rules created by Jews for non-Jews, and these rules relegate us to a 2nd class status. But there are layers to this 2nd class citizenship for non-Jews under Jewish Talmudic law.
Did you know that according to the Talmud, the same book which gives us the Noahide Laws, that African people are considered to be cursed? That’s right, according to the Talmud the ‘negro’ race was produced through a curse on Noah’s son Ham. Since it is the Talmud which informs Noahide Law in general, and it is from Jewish Talmudists that we are informed on the laws, it is certainly possible that some of this Talmudic racism could bleed through, infecting the already nefarious Noahide Laws with a new layer of hate, anti-African racism. Anti-African racism in Israel might be a good indicator for the temper in which Rabbis might promote the Noahide Law among non-Jews.
http://www.noahidelaw.org/racism/
random-91
WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A GER TOSHAV AND A NOAHIDE?
When speaking about Noahide Law with either Jews or Noahides, sometimes a person who is either misinformed or even willingly trying to deceive you will proclaim that there is no reason to worry about Noahide Law since according to Jewish theology, no ‘Ger Toshav’ can be accepted at this time. According to Jewish Law, a ‘Ger Toshav’ can only be accepted during a time when the nation of Israel has instated a holiday called the Jubilee, and the modern nation of Israel has not done this. However, this logic is deceptive, since the speaker is either accidentally or intentionally conflating a ‘Noahide’ with a ‘Ger Toshav’, they are not the same thing!

http://www.noahidelaw.org/what-is-the-difference-between-a-ger-toshav-and-a-noahide/
FURTHER EDUCATION:
CHABAD QUOTES
http://antimatrix.org/Convert/Books/ZioNazi_Quotes/Chabad.html
*****
ALTERNATIVE SATURDAY CARTOONS: JULY 4, 2015: RAINBOW FLAG SPECIAL
http://snippits-and-slappits.blogspot.ca/2015/07/alternative-saturday-cartoons-july-4.html
*****
RED ICE RADIO: DENNIS FETCHO: HOUR 1: ENGLISH QABALAH & NOAHIDE LAW

*****
WHY IS THE US HONORING A RACIST RABBI?
http://snippits-and-slappits.blogspot.ca/2014/04/why-is-us-honoring-racist-rabbi.html
‘Happy will be the lost of Israel, whom the Holy One, blessed be He, has chosen from amongst the Goyim, of whom the Scriptures say: ’Their work is but vanity, it is an illusion at which we must laugh, they will all perish when God visits them in His wrath.’ At the moment when the Holy One, blessed be He, will exterminate all the Goyim of the world, Israel alone will subsist, even as it is written: ‘‘The Lord alone will appear great on that day! …’’ ~ Zohar, Vayshlah 177b
‘It is the law to kill anyone who denies the Torah. The Christians belong to the denying ones of the Torah.’ ~ Coschen hamischpat 425 Hagah 425. 5
‘Although the non-Jew has the same body structure as the Jew, they compare with the Jew like a monkey to a human.’ ~ Schene luchoth haberith, p. 250 b
Rosh Hashanah 17a. Christians (minnim) and others who reject the Talmud will go to hell and be punished there for all generations.
Minor Tractates. Soferim 15, Rule 10. This is the saying of Rabbi Simon ben Yohai: Tob shebe goyyim harog ~‘Even the best of the gentiles should all be killed’.
MJ+2015+Noahide+Jewish+Shariah+1.JPG
MJ+2015+Noahide+Jewish+Shariah+2.JPGMJ+2015+Noahide+Jewish+Shariah+4.JPGMJ+2015+Noahide+Jewish+Shariah+5.JPGMJ+2015+Noahide+Jewish+Shariah+6.JPGMJ+2015+Noahide+Jewish+Shariah+8.JPG
Filed Under: Noahide Law, Noor al-Haqiqa, Snippits and Snappits
Comments
Glenn Shumway says:
January 19, 2016 at 10:06 pm
The Truth about the ‘Noahide Laws’…
NOTE: This article is published anonymously, the authors having previously received anonymous death threats over the phone for publishing similar opinions. Permission is hereby granted to any and all who would re-publish it to do so. The electronic format is graphic PDF so that the content may not be easily altered.
Background . . .
The so-called ‘Noahide’ laws appear nowhere in the written Hebrew Tanakh (what Christians condescendingly call the ‘Old Testament’). They do appear, in great detail, in the Jewish Talmud.
The Talmud is today’s ‘print version’ of what was originally an ‘oral tradition’ of the Pharisees and Sadducees in Yeshua’s time, what he chastised them for as obeying the ‘commandments/doctrines of men’, or ‘traditions of men’, instead of the written Torah of YHVH. (Isaiah 29:13; Mark 7:7) The Talmud represents the ultimate Satanic corruption of what YHVH intended Judaism to be, and as He explained in crystal clear detail to the assembled children of Israel at Mt. Sinai.
The identical corruption has derailed much of ‘Christianity’ through the deceptions of the Roman Catholic Church and all of her daughter whores (Revelation 17:5), the so-called ‘Protestant’ denominations. This common corruption is a manifestation of ‘Mystery Babylon’, the name of Satan’s worldwide spiritual kingdom on the earth (2 Corinthians 4:4), and it is from the period of the Jews’ captivity in physical Babylon that the Talmud admittedly springs. And it has effectively replaced the written Torah of Moses in the lives of most who call themselves ‘Jews’.
The Talmud: Heart’s Blood of the Jewish Faith, was the heading of the 11/17/1959 installment of ‘This Is My God’, a bestseller book by author Herman Wouk (The Caine Mutiny, Marjorie Morningstar, The Winds of War, Youngblood Hawke, Please Don’t Stop the Carnival) which ran serially in the New York Herald-Tribune. To quote:
‘The TALMUD is to this day the circulating heart’s blood of the Jewish religion. Whatever laws, customs or ceremonies we observe whether we are orthodox, Conservative, Reform or merely spasmodic sentimentalists-we follow the TALMUD.
It is our common law.’
[Remember this?Christians.]
The Noahide laws appear as such only in the Talmud, which is the so-called ‘holy book’ used by the overwhelming majority of Jewish rabbis today, in the same way that Christians use the entire Bible. The problem with this is that the Talmud is nothing but a collection of the 100% human opinions of rabbis concerning the Law (Torah), the Prophets (Nevi’im) and the Writings (Ketuvim) and the myriad convoluted ways they have contrived to avoid obeying the written Torah of YHVH.
And no wonder, seeing that the Tanakh (Christian ‘Old Testament’) is mostly a running commentary on YHVH Elohim’s opinion of the ancestors of the Jews and how their continuing idolatries have absolved Him of any responsibility to keep His conditional covenants with the people of Israel as a race. Nevertheless, He has promised to keep His covenant with ‘the children of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob’, but only with a righteous remnant of that group.
‘And at that time shall Michael stand up, the great prince who stands for the children of your people: and there shall be a time of trouble, such as never was since there was a nation until that same time: and at that time your people shall be delivered, every one that shall be found written in the book.’ [Daniel 12:1]
There is only one ‘the book’ which has to do with salvation, and that is the Lamb’s Book of Life (Revelation 21:27). Having one’s name in it is a matter of one’s personal righteousness before the God of the Bible, and no one who considers the Talmud as good for anything has any chance at that status, as we will show. The Talmud contains some of the most virulent hate literature ever written, plus every manner of obscenity and rabbinical permission to Jews to commit unlimited atrocities against Gentiles, simply because they believe themselves to be ‘the chosen people’ of YHVH, no matter what they do, and all in direct contravention of what our Lord Yeshua called ‘the Law and the Prophets’!
It is impossible for any truly begotten-again disciple of Yeshua of Nazareth to also ‘be’ a Noahide, since the Talmudic ‘Jews’ believe today, as they did in Yeshua’s day, that Yeshua haMaschiach was a false Messiah, and reverence of him AS the Promised One to be a sin worthy of death. Therefore, the ‘Noahide laws’ are actually nothing more than a thinly-veiled Jewish ruse to try to deceive Christians into believing that they can somehow be ‘reconciled’ to rabbinic Judaism. All one has to do to be accepted by the rabbis is agree to abandon whatever religious beliefs and practices they may have been observing, such as Christianity, and follow the ‘Noahide Laws’ instead. Simple, no?
No. Under rabbinic Jewish halakha law, the penalty for a Gentile’s (non-Jew’s) failure to do so is decapitation, and that sentence may be carried out based on the unsupported accusation of but a single Jew, which is itself a violation of the written Torah. (Deuteronomy 17:6)
Much of the Talmud is virulently anti-Gentile, and especially anti-Christian. Here are a few sample quotes from the Talmud (English Soncino Edition):
1. ‘The teachings of the Talmud stand above all other laws. They are more important than the laws of Moses.’ -Rabbi Issael, Rabbi Chasbar, et. al.
2. ‘The decisions of the Talmud are words of the living God. God Himself asks the opinion of the earthly rabbis when there are difficult affairs in heaven.’ -Rabbi Menechen Commentary on Fifth Book
3. ‘God Himself studies the Talmud standing, he has such respect for that book.’ -Tract Mechillo
4. ‘It is more wicked to question the words of the rabbis than those of the Torah.’ -Mischna Sanhedryn 11:3
5. ‘It is forbidden to disclose the secrets of the oral law. He who would do it would be as guilty as though he destroyed the whole world.’ -Jektat Chadasz, 171, 3
6. ‘Every non-Jew who studies the Talmud and every Jew who helps him in it, ought to die.’ -Sanhedryn, 59a, Aboda Zarah 8-6, Szagiga 13
7. ‘To communicate anything to a non-Jew about our religious relations would be equal to the killing of all Jews, for if the non-Jew knew what we teach about them they would kill us openly.’ -Libbre David 37
8. ‘If a Jew be called upon to explain any part of the rabbinic books, he ought to give only a false explanation. Who ever will violate this order shall be put to death.’ -Libbre David 37
9. ‘A Jew should and must make a false oath when the non-Jew asks if our books contain anything against them.’ -Szaaloth-Utszabot, The Book of Jore 17
10. ‘The Jews are human beings, but the nations of the world are not human beings but beasts…’ -Saba Mecia 114, 6
11. ‘When the Messiah comes every Jew will have 2800 slaves.’ -Simeon Haddarsen, fol. 56-D
12. ‘God created the non-Jew in human form so that the Jew would not have to be served by beasts. The non-Jew is consequently an animal in human form, and condemned to serve the Jew day and night.’ -Midrasch Talpioth, p. 225-L
13. ‘As soon as the King Messiah will declare himself, He will destroy Rome and make a wilderness of it. Thorns and weeds will grow in the Pope’s palace. Then He will start a merciless war on non-Jews and will overpower them. He will slay them in masses, kill their kings and lay waste the whole Roman land. He will say to the Jews: ‘I am the King Messiah for whom you have been waiting. Take the silver and gold from the non-Jew.’ ’ -Josiah 60, 6. Rabbi Abarbanel to Daniel 7, 13
14. ‘A Gentile girl who is three years old can be sexually violated.’ Aboda Zarah 37a
15. ‘A Jew may violate but not marry a non-Jewish girl.’ -&ad. Shas. 2:2
16. ‘A Jew may do to a non-Jewess what he can do. He may treat her as he treats a piece of meat.’ -Hadarine, 20, B; Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 348
17. ‘A Jew may misuse the non-Jewess in her state of unbelief.’ -Maimonides, Jak. Chasaka 2:2
18. ‘If a non-Jew kills a non-Jew or a Jew he is responsible; but if a Jew kills a non-Jew he is NOT responsible.’ -Tosefta Aboda 8, 5
19. ‘It is permitted to kill a Jewish denunciator everywhere. It is permitted to kill him even before he denounces.’ -Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 348
20. ‘Thou shalt not do injury to thy neighbor, but it is not said, ‘Thou shalt not do injury to a non-Jew.’ ’ -Mishna Sanhedryn 57
21. ‘When you go to war do not go as the first, but as the last, so that you may return as the first. Five things has Canaan [the Jew living in a Gentile society] recommended to his sons: ‘Love each other, love robbery, hate your masters and never tell the truth.’ ’ -Pesachis F. 113B
22. ‘A Jew is permitted to rape, cheat and perjure himself; but he must take care that he is not found out, so that Israel may not suffer.’ -Schulchan Aruch, Iore Dia
23. ‘A Jew may rob a non-Jew that is, he may cheat him in a bill, if unlikely to be perceived by him.’ -Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 348
24. ‘If a non-Jew wants a Jew to stand witness against a Jew in a Court of Law, and if the Jew could give fair evidence, he is forbidden to do it; but if a Jew wants a Jew to be a witness in a similar case against a non-Jew, he may do it.’ -Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 28, Art. 3 and 4
25. ‘Those who do not confess the Torah and the Prophets must be killed. Who has the power to kill them, let them kill them openly with the sword. if not, let them use artifices, till they are done away with.’ -Schulchan Aruch. Choszen Hamiszpat 425.5
26. ‘All property of other nations belongs to the Jewish nation, which, consequently, is entitled to seize upon it without any scruples. An orthodox Jew is not bound to observe principles of morality towards people of other tribes. He may act contrary to morality, if profitable to himself or to Jews in general’ ’ -Schulchan Aruch. Choszen Hamiszpat 348
27. ‘Should a Jew inform the non-Jewish authorities that another Jew has much money, and the other will suffer a loss through it, he must give him emuneration.’ -Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 388
28. ‘How to interpret the word ‘robbery.’ A non-Jew is forbidden to steal, rob, or take women slaves, etc., from a non-Jew or from a Jew. But a Jew is NOT forbidden to do all this to a non-Jew.’ -Tosefta, Aboda Zara, 5
29. ‘On the house of the non-Jew one looks as on the fold of cattle.’ -Tosefta, Erebin, 1
30. ‘All vows, oaths, promises, engagements, and swearing, which, beginning this very day or reconciliation till the next day of reconciliation, we intend to vow, promise, swear, and bind ourselves to fulfill, we repent of beforehand; let them be illegalized, acquitted, annihilated, abolished, valueless, unimportant. Our vows shall be no vows, and our oaths no oaths at all.’ -Schulchan Aruch, Edit. 1, 136. The Jewish Kol Nidre ‘All Vows’ Oath has been set to a morbid Jewish music, and is often heard on the radio. It is sung as a chant at each Yom Kippur (Jewish New Year service). [[ Most importantly, we ask why anyone who professes to be a rabbinic Jew of any sort should be elected to any public office, or promoted to any executive position, since their ‘religion’ requires them to take FALSE OATHS, and to LIE whenever it is in the interests of ‘Judaism’ for them to do so! WHY?]]
31. ‘Everything a Jew needs for his church ritual no non-Jew is permitted to manufacture, but only a Jew, because this must be manufactured by human beings and the Jew is not permitted to consider the non-Jew as human beings.’ -Schulchan Aruch, Aruch Chaim 14, 20, 32, 33, 39. Talmud Jebamoth 61
32. ‘A Jewish mid-wife is not only permitted but she is compelled to help a Jewish mother on Saturday (Jewish Sabbath) and when so doing to do anything which otherwise would desecrate the Saturday. But it is forbidden to help a non-Jewish woman even if it should be possible to help her without desecrating the Saturday, because she is to be considered only as an animal.’ -Schulchan Aruch, Aruch Chaim 330
33. ‘At the time of the Cholhamoed the transaction of any kind of business is forbidden. But it is permitted to cheat a non-Jew, because cheating of non-Jew at any time pleases the Lord.’ -Schulchan Aruch, Aruch Chaim 539
34. ‘The Jews are strictly forbidden to cheat their brothers and it is considered cheating already if one-sixth of the value has been taken away from him. Whoever has cheated his brother has to return it to him. Naturally all that only holds towards the Jew, to cheat a non-Jew is permitted and he is not permitted to return to him what he cheated him out of. Because the Bible says: ‘Thou shalt not cheat thy next brother,’ but the non-Jews are not our brethren, but as mentioned above, worse than dogs.’ -Baruch Choszen Hamiszpat 227
We realize that this is hard to believe, so we urge the reader to do some research on your own. A simple internet search on ‘Talmud’ will turn up any number of sites devoted to exposing this ‘holy book’ of the Jews for what it really is: racist hate literature.
More Jewish Propaganda . . .
Certain Jews today continually use such religious and impressive sounding words as ‘the Jewish faith,’ ‘the Jewish people/religion/race,’ ‘Jewish spiritual values,’ ‘Jewish religious doctrines,’ and the like, which are designed to deceive and lead the ignorant into mindless compliance with their plans. Behind this mask of contrived pseudo-religiosity stands a complete plan for world government, world power, world conquest, a Jewish kingdom of this world, the total destruction of Christianity and all true believers right along with it. It is the meat and substance of Hassidic Jewry, which is Pharisaic Talmudism, and ultimately, Pre-Millennial (prior to Messiah’s return) Zionism.
‘Jewish Talmudism owes its existence today to the indifference with which it is regarded by the Christian community. The Jew is prejudiced against the Bible, doing what he can to destroy public honor of the Book.’ (The International Jew, Vol. III, p. 16).
‘I am devoting my lecture in this seminar to a discussion of the possibility that we are now entering a Jewish century, a time when the spirit of the community, the non-ideological blend of the emotional and rational and the resistance to categories and forms will emerge through the forces of anti-nationalism to provide us with a new kind of society. I call this process the Judaization of Christianity because Christianity will be the vehicle through which this society becomes Jewish.’ (Rabbi Martin Siegel, New York Magazine, p. 32, January 18, 1972)
When studied carefully, we can clearly see in all four Gospels the racial, political, and religious clash between Yeshua Messiah and his devoted Judean followers together with the written Law of Moses versus the Babylonian Pharisees (the ‘Jews,’ and their ‘Oral Law’, which eventually became the Talmud). This intense, never-ending conflict is the defining feature of the struggle between early, first-hand Christian truth and its satanic counterfeit, that of Talmudic Judaism the same battle which still continues unabated to this very day.
‘For you, brethren, became followers of the churches of God which in Judæa are in Messiah Yeshua: for you also have suffered like things from your own countrymen, even as they have of the Jews, who both killed the Lord Yeshua, and their own prophets, and have persecuted us; and they please not God, and are contrary to all men.’ [Words of the Apostle Sha’ul/Paul, himself a Pharisee: 1 Thessalonians 2:14-15]
The late Jewish academic Professor Israel Shahak, in his classic study Jewish History, Jewish Religion, gives an example: ‘In 1962 a part of the Maimonidean Code … the so-called ‘Book of Knowledge,’ which contains the most basic rules of Jewish faith and practice, was published in Jerusalem in a bilingual edition, with the English translation facing the Hebrew text. The latter has been restored to its original purity, and the command to exterminate Jewish infidels appears in it in full: ‘It is a duty to exterminate them with one’s own hands.’ In the English translation this is somewhat softened to: ‘It is a duty to take active measures to destroy them.’
But then the Hebrew text goes on to specify the prime examples of ‘infidels’ who must be exterminated: ‘Such as Yeshua of Nazareth and his pupils, and Tzadoq and Baitos [the founders of the Sadducean sect] and their pupils, may the name of the wicked rot.’ Not one word of this appears in the English text on the facing page (78a). And, even more significant, in spite of the wide circulation of this book among scholars in the English-speaking countries, not one of them has, as far as I know, protested against this glaring deception.’
The New, Improved Jewish ‘Messiah’ . . .
Today’s elitist Pharisaic ‘Jews’ believe that the mind-set of the world must be changed to think of Christianity as evil and of them as the true Elect, i.e., those who practice Pharisaism, (Babylonian Talmudism), as the ONE AND ONLY genuine Chosen People of God. Talmudic Jews call the New Testament Covenant ‘blank paper’ (Talmud, Sabbath 116a), therefore claiming that:
(1) Christianity is a 2,000 year old fraud;
(2) Talmudism/Pharisaism is the only true religion of God on the earth; and,
(3) the Talmud is the only ‘holy book’ God has ordained since the Tanakh.
In The Pharisees, his two-volume work, the renowned Rabbi Finklestein writes: ‘Pharisaism became Talmudism… but the spirit of the ancient Pharisee remains unaltered. When the Jew studies the Talmud he is actually repeating the arguments used in the Palestinian academies. From Palestine to Babylonia: from Babylonia to North Africa, Italy, Spain, France and Germany; from these to Poland, Russia and Eastern Europe generally, ancient Pharisaism has wandered.’
In Rabbi Finklestein’s history of the Jews, he states: ‘the Talmud derives its authority from the position held by the ancient (Pharisee) academies. The teachers of those academies, both of Babylonia and of Palestine, were considered the rightful successors of the older Sanhedrin. At the present time the Jewish people have no living central authority comparable in status to the ancient Sanhedrin’s or the later academies. Therefore any decision regarding the Jewish religion must be based on the Talmud as the final résumé of the teaching of those authorities when they existed.’ (The JEWS Their History, Culture and Religion, Vol 4, p 1332, Jewish Publication Society of America, 1949).
The Coming Jewish World-State . . .
‘A model ideal state will gradually spread its teachings and influence from nation to nation, …the people of Israel [Jews] will thus conquer the nations of the earth …all other peoples will be known by their detestable practices and idolatry [They call Christians idolaters] …they will be destroyed and will disappear from earth before the ushering in of the ideal era. To understand the Rabbinic conception of an ideal world it will help us if we can imagine A HAND PASSING FROM LAND TO LAND, COUNTRY TO COUNTRY, MARKING RIGHTEOUS OR WICKED ON THE FOREHEADS OF EACH ONE OF THE INHABITANTS OF THE EARTHLY GLOBE’ (The Jewish Utopia, by Rabbi Michael Higger, Ph.D.).
‘When the Messiah comes, all will be slaves of the Jews.’ (Talmud, Erubin 43b)
During the coming horrendous period when Talmudic Jews will reign unchallenged in one form or another under the auspices of their pseudo god-king, the anti-Christ, it will be they that will re-introduce beheading as an execution measure to satisfy their Talmud-sanctioned blood-lust. This method of execution for the faithful saints during this time is even mentioned in the book of Revelation:
‘…and I saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Yeshua, and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands;’ (Revelation 20:4)
The deaths of which, will be seen as doing their ‘god’ a favor according to this:
‘A Jew who kills a Christian commits no sin, but offers an acceptable sacrifice to God.’ (Talmud Abodah Zarah 26b Tosephoth)
And this too is prophesied by our Lord Yeshua (John 16:2-3):
2 They shall put you out of the synagogues: yea, the time comes, that whosoever kills you will think that he does God service.
3 And these things will they do unto you, because they have not known the Father, nor me.
What Are the ‘Noahide/Noachide Laws’? . . .
According to the Talmud, the so-called ‘Noahide’ (or ‘Noachide’) Laws were given by God to Noah when the ark came to rest on Mount Ararat. This is entirely unsubstantiated by the written Hebrew Tanakh (what Christians call the ‘Old Testament’), and should be regarded by Christians as nothing more than cunning Jewish lies designed to ultimately enslave them.
Why?
Because what they don’t tell us is that the Noahide Laws ONLY APPLY TO NON-JEWS, that Christianity is ‘idol worship’ under the Noahide Laws, and ALL non-Jews who refuse to be bound by them will be killed, probably by beheading, which is the prescribed method of execution under these laws. Is any of this prophesied in the Christian Bible? You judge . . .
‘…and I saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Yeshua, and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Messiah a thousand years.’ [Revelation 20:4]
‘…and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan.’ [Revelation 2:9]
‘Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie; behold, I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, and to know that I have loved thee.’ [Revelation 3:9]
Let us start by listing these seven major ‘Noahide’ Laws:
1. You shall not engage in idol worship.
2. You shall not blaspheme God.
3. You shall not shed innocent blood of a human nor fetus nor ailing person who has a limited time to live.
4. You shall not engage in bestial, incestuous, adulterous, or homosexual relations nor commit …rape.
5. You shall not steal.
6. You shall establish laws and courts of law to administer these laws.
7. You shall not be cruel to animals.
Sounds pretty noble, religion-neutral, and universally acceptable, doesn’t it? But the devil is in the details, the ‘details’ in this case being the definitions of ‘idol worship’, ‘blaspheme’, ‘innocent’, ‘administer’, etc.
The ‘Encyclopedia Americana’ gives its ‘explanation’ of the Noahide Laws,
‘Throughout the ages, scholars have viewed the Noahide Laws as a link between Judaism and Christianity, as universal norms of ethical conduct, as a basic concept of international law, or as a guarantee of fundamental human rights for all.’
They somehow neglect to mention that the Noahide Laws apply only to non-Jews. Moreover, this facile explanation leads one to believe that (a) all ‘scholars’ agree about the legitimacy of the ‘Noahide’ laws; and (b) that everyone on earth should agree to be bound by these seven laws. However, the truth is that the Jew who claims to live according to the ‘Torah,’ (certainly not the written Torah given to Moses, but rather the Talmud, that occultic/Kabbalistic/Pharisaic tradition adopted from the mystery religions of ancient Babylon) is not bound by the Noahide Laws. The Noahide Laws will only apply to non-Jews and are to be a direct replacement for all other civil and religious laws AND the Biblical Ten Commandments, with draconian penalties attached which far exceed anything allowed by the written Torah of Moses.
‘It is the law to kill anyone who denies the Torah. The Christians belong to the denying ones of the Torah.’ Talmud: Choszhen hamischpat 425 Hagah 425. 5
Now does that sound like their version of ‘Torah’ is the same as our Biblical Old Testament? We think not! These ‘Jews’ wish to commence with the U.S.A. to be ruled by the Noahide Laws, (which at first glance seem to be something harmless, and even moral) together with whatever is intrinsically implied in them however, as is said, ‘the devil is in the details.’
One of these ‘details’ is that there are also sixty-six other
‘Lesser-Known Noahide Laws’ which are equally deadly.
The real goal of ALL of the Noahide Laws is to have the non-Jewish population of the United States (and eventually the world) totally subject to and ruled by judicial enactments that are exclusively managed, interpreted and manipulated by ultra-orthodox Jewish rabbis, a new Sanhedrin. The penalty for violation is clearly spelled out on page 1192 of the Encyclopedia Judaica: ‘violation of any one of the seven laws subjects the Noahide to capital punishment by DECAPITATION’, even being ‘cruel’ to an animal. Rather harsh, wouldn’t you say?
So, if only one Jew steps forward to merely accuse any non-Jew of violating any one of these seven laws, that testimony alone regardless of the absence of corroborating witnesses or the otherwise proven untruth of the allegation would be enough for the sentence of death. But notice how Deuteronomy 17:6 clearly requires the testimony of 2 or 3 witnesses before one who deserves death can be executed. In fact, the last sentence of verse 6 states: ‘At the mouth of two witnesses, or three witnesses, shall he that is worthy of death be put to death; but at the mouth of one witness he shall NOT be put to death.’ So much for the COMMANDMENT of YHVH Elohim!
‘Every Jew, who spills the blood of the godless, (non-Jews) is doing the same as making a sacrifice to God.’ (Talmud: Bammidber raba c 21 & Jalkut 772)
Their dead bodies will be exhibited as public warnings to all others who would resist their power. The Lord’s Supper will be transformed from wine, the symbolic blood of Yeshua, to the real blood of true believers, that will be soon freely shed under this new, Satanic theocracy!
Always remember as Biblical fact, that the Pharisaic Jewish establishment succeeded in the illegal trial and subsequent killing of Yeshua Messiah on the primary basis that he blasphemed God (Matthew 26:65), which is Noahide Law number 2 ‘Thou shalt not blaspheme God.’
‘Extermination of a Christian is a necessary sacrifice to God.’ Talmud Zohar (II, 43a)
Make no mistake, these remarkable and sickening quotes from the Talmud (Soncino Edition) here and elsewhere, are quite genuine and gleaned from a large variety of reliable sources, mostly Jewish. These are but a few of the hundreds of similar Talmudic passages that deal with the required treatment of Christians. THIS is the reality of the Jewish Talmudic ‘legacy,’ and there is much more to come.
‘The Jewish people as a whole will be its own Messiah.’ It will attain world dominion by the dissolution of other races, by the abolition of frontiers, the annihilation of monarchy, and by the establishment of a world republic in which the Jews will everywhere exercise the privilege of citizenship. In this New World Order the Children of Israel will furnish all the leaders without encountering opposition. The Governments of the different peoples forming the world republic will fall without difficulty into the hands of the Jews. It will then be possible for the Jewish rulers to abolish private property, and everywhere to make use of the resources of the state. Thus will the promise of the Talmud be fulfilled, in which is said that when the Messianic time is come the Jews will have all the property of the whole world in their hands.’
[Baruch Levy, Letter to Karl Marx, La Revue de Paris, p. 54, June 1, 1928]
Bear in mind that the above is not taken from the ‘Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion’, a work which has been vehemently denied by virtually all rabbinic Jews as an imposture. This is an authenticated verbatim quotation from one of the early recognized leaders of international Zionism! What does it mean that it is actually a condensed version of the absolutely identical aims and methods as put forward in the ‘Protocols’? Who is kidding whom?
Please note that these so-called ‘Noahide Laws’ appear NOWHERE in the written Tanakh, the
Old Testament of the Christian Bible, but have been INVENTED by the Pharisaic authors of the Babylonian Talmud, the Kabbalah, a.k.a. ‘Mystery Babylon’, as a bogus theological assertion to try to legitimize their bloodthirsty lust for power. Have they succeeded? You be the judge.
The following is an edict by President Ronald Reagan:
Public Papers of the Presidents April 4, 1985
CITE: 1985 Pub. Papers LENGTH: 365 words
HEADLINE: Education Day, U.S.A., 1985 HIGHLIGHT: Proclamation 5317.
BODY: By the President of the United States of America
A proclamation [emphasis added]
In order to achieve its highest goals, education must be more than just a training in facts and figures, or even in basic skills, as important as they are. It must also include instruction in the deepest ethical values of our civilization.
Very few Americans have done more to promote these ethical values as the basis of civilization than Rabbi Mendel Schneerson, the leader of the worldwide Lubavitch movement. The word ‘Lubavitch’ comes from the name of a Russian city and means city of love. That is very appropriate because, of all the ethical values which inform our civilization, none is more important than love of wisdom, love of our fellowman, and love of our Creator.
These are the values which Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson exemplifies. And they are the values, with their roots in the Seven Noahide Laws, which have guided the Lubavitch movement throughout its history. They are the essence of education at its best, and we should be certain that we pass on this precious heritage to all young Americans.
In recognition of Rabbi Schneerson’s contributions and in honor of his 83rd birthday, which falls this year on April 2, the Congress, by House Joint Resolution 186, has designated April 2, 1985, as ‘Education Day, U.S.A.’ and authorized and requested the President to issue an appropriate proclamation in observance of this event.
Now, Therefore, I, Ronald Reagan, President of the United States of America, do hereby proclaim Tuesday, April 2, 1985, as Education Day, U.S.A., and I call upon the people of the United States, and in particular our teachers and other educational leaders, to observe that day with appropriate ceremonies and activities.
In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand this fourth day of April, in the year of our Lord nineteen hundred and eighty-five, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and ninth.
(signed) Ronald Reagan [Filed with the Office of the Federal Register, 11:48 a.m., April 5, 1985]
And this . . .
The Congress of the United States of America has declared that the seven universal laws commanded to Noah (the Noahide laws) are ‘the bedrock of society from the dawn of civilization.’ U.S. Congress, H.J. Resolution 104, Public Law 102-14, 1991.
Believe it or not, boys and girls, this effectively establishes the Noahide Laws as the primary basis for all International Law, (read ‘New World Order’) to which all American law MUST eventually conform. This unique public law remarkably singles out one particular Jewish group for special honor, saying that they best embody the principles of these Noahide Laws. This group is the previously mentioned Chabad Lubavitcher Movement, of the rabidly anti-Gentile Chabad Hasidic Jews.
The following is a blueprint for the establishment of the Noahide Laws in the formerly Palistinian-occupied areas of ‘Israel’. It is quoted from Al Gore Letter #10, 01-Nov-2000 Education Day USA (since removed from the internet, for obvious reasons):
‘Upon seizing the reins of government, the new Noahide leaders will move quickly to implement a full agenda of reform. … Full support will be given to Israeli forces to reinvade PLO-controlled areas, with military assistance offered where necessary. Jewish courts will be granted full legal sovereignty over Jewish citizens within each country, who will no longer be subject to the authority of gentile courts. The pre-existing Noahide judges and courts will replace the existing court system of each country, and the legal code will be drastically rewritten to conform to halacha…. …. And law and order will be fully restored through the establishment of internal security measures, again in accordance with Torah law.’
So, apparently seeking ANY kind of a power base in a storm, algore the goyische goldfish, has ignorantly thrown in with the Lubavitcher piranha. And the beat goes on.
But at least some Jewish scholars have come to somewhat different, and less flattering, conclusions concerning the Lubavitchers and their ‘Messiah’ wanna-be. Israel Shahak, a Jew, in his book, Jewish History, Jewish Religion: The Weight of Three Thousand Years, states that:
‘My final, more general example is, if possible, even more shocking than the others. It concerns the attitude of the Hassidic movement toward non-Jews. Hassidism a continuation (and debasement!) of Jewish mysticism is still a living movement, with hundreds of thousands of active adherents who are fanatically devoted to their ‘holy rabbis,’ some of whom have acquired a very considerable political influence in Israel, among the leaders of most parties and even more so in the higher echelons of the army.
‘What, then, are the views of this movement concerning non-Jews? As an example, let us take the famous Hatanya, fundamental book of the Habbad movement, one of the most important branches of Hassidism. According to this book, all non-Jews are totally satanic creatures ‘in whom there is absolutely nothing good.’
‘Even a non-Jewish embryo is qualitatively different from a Jewish one. The very existence of a non-Jew is ‘inessential’, whereas all of creation was created solely for the sake of the Jews.’
‘This book is circulated in countless editions, and its ideas are further propagated in the numerous ‘discourses’ of the rabbi, M. M. Schneurssohn (Schneerson), who leads this powerful world-wide organisation from his New York headquarters.
‘In Israel these ideas are widely disseminated among the public at large, in the schools and in the army. (According to the testimony of Shulamit Aloni, Member of the Knesset, this Habbad propaganda was particularly stepped up before Israel’s invasion of Lebanon in March 1978, in order to induce military doctors and nurses to withhold medical help from ‘Gentile wounded.’ This Nazi-like advice did not refer specifically to Arabs or Palestinians, but simply to ‘Gentiles,’ goyim.)
‘A former Israeli President, Shazar, was an ardent adherent of Habbad, and many top Israeli and American politicians headed by Prime Minister Begin publicly courted and supported it. This, in spite of the considerable unpopularity of the Lubavitcher rabbi in Israel he was widely criticised because he refuses to come to the Holy Land even for a visit and keeps himself in New York for obscure messianic reasons, while in New York his anti-Black attitude is notorious.
‘The fact that, despite these pragmatic difficulties, Habbad can be publicly supported by so many top political figures owes much to the thoroughly disingenuous and misleading treatment by almost all scholars who have written about the Hassidic movement and its Habbad branch. This applies particularly to all who have written or are writing about it in English. They suppress the glaring evidence of the old Hassidic texts as well as the latter-day political implications that follow from them, which stare in the face of even a casual reader of the Israeli Hebrew press, in whose pages the Lubavitcher rabbi and other Hassidic leaders constantly publish the most rabid bloodthirsty statements and exhortations against all Arabs.
‘A chief deceiver in this case, and a good example of the power of deception, was Martin Buber. His numerous works eulogising the whole Hassidic movement (including Habbad) never so much as hint at the real doctrines of Hassidism concerning non-Jews. The crime of deception is all the greater in view of the fact that Buber’s eulogies of Hassidism were first published in German during the period of the rise of German nationalism and the accession of Nazism to power.
‘But while ostensibly opposing Nazism, Buber glorified a movement holding and actually teaching doctrines about non-Jews not unlike the Nazi doctrines about Jews. One could of course argue that the Hassidic Jews of seventy or fifty years ago were the victims, and a ‘white lie’ favouring a victim is excusable. But the consequences of deception are incalculable. Buber’s works were translated into Hebrew, were made a powerful element of the Hebrew education in Israel, have greatly increased the power of the blood-thirsty Hassidic leaders, and have thus been an important factor in the rise of Israeli chauvinism and hatred of all non-Jews. If we think of the many human beings who died of their wounds because Israeli army nurses, incited by Hassidic propaganda, refused to tend them, then a heavy onus for their blood lies on the head of Martin Buber.’
Quoted verbatim from Israel Shahak, Jewish History, Jewish Religion: The Weight of Three Thousand Years, Pluto Press, London and Boulder Colorado, 1994, pp. 26-28.
The Real Goals of the Lubavitchers . . .
Here, exposed from behind the carefully contrived façade of phony moral statutes and deliberately misleading phrases, are the real goals of the Noahide Laws:
1. The elimination of the entire written Hebrew Tanakh and the total rejection of the Renewed Covenant Scriptures (‘New Testament’);
2. The rejection of the atonement of HaMashiach upon the execution stake;
3. The rejection of the Plan/Logos of YHVH Elohim for the salvation of mankind;
4. The spying on one another to supply the one eyewitness needed to trigger the death penalty (contrary to Deuteronomy 17:6);
5. The necessity of keeping the other 66 ‘lesser known Noahide laws’;
6. Circumcision of all males;
7. Eating only rabbinically-approved kosher foods;
8. Forbidding the holding of religious services of any type in a place that is not an approved assembly place for Noahides;
9. The death penalty for anyone (Christians being the main target) who claims that God has spoken through them by way of teaching, preaching or writing, that is in any way contradictory to the establishment ‘worship system.’
‘The Christians are always singing about the blood. Let us give them enough of it! Let us cut their throats and drag them over the altar! And let them drown in their own blood! I dream of the day when the last priest is strangled on the guts of the last preacher.’ (Chairman of the American Communist Party, Gus Hall, a Jew)
It will be a serious crime to claim to be a Prophet, Preacher, or Pastor, to whom the Antichrist authorities have not issued a certificate of approval, and it will be a death penalty offence to oppose in any way the new ‘religion’. ‘Opposition’ means to merely speak against any Jewish priest, any Jewish rabbi, any Noahide minister, any Noahide or Jewish temple or place of worship, or oppose any doctrine that the ‘Rebbe Adepts’ teach or advocate. So, under the guise of Pharisaic Judaism, the modern Kabbalists are cunningly taking us all back to Babylon, and to the ancient house of pagan bondage from which they slithered.
How then, could any Torah-true talmid (disciple) of Yeshua of Nazareth ever support the diabolical plotting behind the precepts of the Noahide laws, to aid in the destruction of the Renewed Covenant Scriptures (‘New Testament’), and of the Church, and be complicit in the killing of the precious and faithful Saints of God? Yet this is exactly what the reconstruction of the Temple will surely lead to!
Antichrists are even now arising from all Protestant denominations, who deny that salvation is through Yeshua Messiah alone. The Roman Catholic ‘pope’ has said as much, and leaders of certain Anglican, Episcopal, Presbyterian, and other ‘mainline Protestant’ denominations have said as much. This is that spirit of Anti-Christ which will join forces with Jewish rabbis together with other ‘Jewish-Gentile’ groups to complete their total assault on evangelical Christianity.
‘All Jews are good by nature, all non-Jews are evil by nature. The Jews are creation’s crowning glory, the non-Jews are the scum of the earth.’
This quote is typical of the Talmudic-Jewish philosophy that saturates the thinking of Jews such as Rabbi Shneur Zalman, one of the leading ‘Halacha’ scholars in Jewish history according to the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, March 11, 1994, p. 14.
From Their Own Lips . . .
The following is included, not from any desire to inflame Christians, but so that Christians may
see for themselves what many Jews believe about themselves and about Christ, Christianity, and Christians. The following is taken verbatim from a prominent ‘Lubavitcher’ website, the ‘Noah’s Covenant Web Site’, http://www.noahide.com/yeshu.htm…
[NOTE: Bible verses quoted below have been inserted for the reader’s understanding.
They are NOT included in the Chabad Lubavitcher website text.
Also, the web address above, ending in YESHU, is not ‘a Jewish way of spelling Yeshua.’ It is an ACRONYM in Hebrew (Yemach shemo vezichro), used to refer to Yeshua, standing for ‘May his name and memory be blotted out’. Ed.]

************************ Start of the Chabad Lubavitcher website **************************
Who Was Jesus?
The Bible gave a warning about a dangerous, false prophet who would arise to test our faith in G-d. In Deuteronomy 13, [Note: The following obviously is a warning against GENERIC behavior, NOT against a SPECIFIC person. Ed.]
13:1 IF there arise among you a prophet, or a dreamer of dreams, and giveth thee a sign or a wonder,
2 And the sign or the wonder come to pass, whereof he spake unto thee, saying, Let us go after other gods, which thou hast not known, and let us serve them; [Yeshua never preached any God but the unitary, monotheistic YHVH Elohim of the Hebrew Tanakh, and they know it!]
3 Thou shalt not hearken unto the words of that prophet, or that dreamer of dreams: for the LORD your God proveth you, to know whether ye love the LORD your God with all your heart and with all your soul.
4 Ye shall walk after the LORD your God, and fear him, and keep his commandments, and obey his voice, and ye shall serve him, and cleave unto him.
5 And that prophet, or that dreamer of dreams, shall be put to death; because he hath spoken to turn you away from the LORD your God, which brought you out of the land of Egypt, and
redeemed you out of the house of bondage, to thrust thee out of the way which the LORD thy God commanded thee to walk in. So shalt thou put the evil away from the midst of thee.
6 If thy brother, the son of thy mother, or thy son, or thy daughter, or the wife of thy bosom, or thy friend, which is as thine own soul, entice thee secretly, saying, Let us go and serve other gods, which thou hast not known, thou, nor thy fathers;
7 Namely, of the gods of the people which are round about you, nigh unto thee, or far off from thee, from the one end of the earth even unto the other end of the earth;
8 Thou shalt not consent unto him, nor hearken unto him; neither shall thine eye pity him, neither shalt thou spare, neither shalt thou conceal him:
9 But thou shalt surely kill him; thine hand shall be first upon him to put him to death, and afterwards the hand of all the people.
10 And thou shalt stone him with stones, that he die; because he hath sought to thrust thee away from the LORD thy God, which brought thee out of the land of Egypt, from the house of bondage.
11 And all Israel shall hear, and fear, and shall do no more any such wickedness as this is among you.
G-d describes this [Emphasis added. Ed.] false prophet as a member of the Jewish people (v. 2, 7) who would tell true prophecies and would have the power of miracles. G-d Himself would give this false prophet the power to perform miracles and reveal prophecy, but the false prophet would try to seduce the people away from G-d’s Law and towards strange gods unknown to Judaism. The purpose would be to test whether we are truly committed to living under the Law [by which they mean their oral Torah/Talmud, which violates the written Torah of YHVH in myriad ways!], or whether we will be dazzled and fall for the temptation to join a false path to salvation (v. 3-6, 7-8, 11). In this Biblical passage, G-d repeatedly commands the Jews to kill this false prophet, lest the evil spread and destroy many souls.
To be accepted by the people, the false prophet would sometimes pretend to be a righteous Jew who fulfills the Law, but at key moments he would turn against certain details of the Law in order to make the breach (v. 6, 7). This is the reason that verse 1 commands us not to add or subtract any details from the Law, and verse 5 warns us to remain steadfast with all the traditions of the Law. [[It says NO SUCH THING, and YHVH Elohim EXPLICITLY CONDEMNS the teaching of ‘the commandments of men, taught as doctrine.’ (Isaiah 29:13)]]
In Deuteronomy 17, this false prophet is also described as someone who would rebel against the authority of the judges of the Jewish people, and who should be put to death for his rebelliousness (v. 8-13, esp. v. 12). Who are the judges? The highest court in Israel was the Sanhedrin, which was established by Moses (Exodus 18:13-26; Numbers 11:16-29), and which lasted more than 15 centuries. [[Neither Moses nor ‘the judges’ were ANYWHERE AUTHORIZED TO CHANGE THE WRITTEN TORAH. Yet they did, and do!]] The members of the Sanhedrin were the rabbis known as ‘Pharisees’ (Pirushim, ‘those with the explanation’). G-d gave permanent authority to these judges to interpret the Law and G?d’s Word, [Moses gave them the authority to INTERPRET, not CHANGE, TORAH.- Ed.] and it is a commandment to follow their decisions without turning even slightly to the right or the left (Deut. 17:11). [[Another BFL. The command is to obey the WRITTEN TORAH, not ‘the commandments of men, taught as doctrine. (Isaiah 29:13) -Ed.]] But the false prophet would challenge the authority of the Sanhedrin, thus revealing himself to be an evil man.
[The authors thereby call Yeshua haMashiach ‘an evil man’ and thus bear false witness against the holy Spirit, which is sacrilege, blasphemy, and ‘the unforgivable sin’. Ed.]
In the book of the prophet Daniel, this false prophet is described as a king (the eleventh horn on a terrible beast) who would wage war against the Jews (the ‘holy ones’; see Deut. 14:2 on this term) and would change the Law including the calendar and the holidays (Daniel 7:8, 20-25).
[So here they call Christ the anti-Christ, totally ignoring the sequence of end-times events described in Daniel, Ezekiel, Jeremiah, Isaiah, Joel, etc.! Again, bearing false witness against the holy Spirit of YHVH Elohim, Ruach haKodesh! Ed.]
Elsewhere, this false prophet is described as a king who would disregard the G-d of his fathers, exalting himself as a god and giving honor to this new god-head (Daniel 11:36-39).
The man known today as ‘Yeshua’ fulfilled all these prophecies. He became a ‘king’ (over the Christian church) who changed the original Law, doing away with the Hebrew calendar and the Biblical holidays (Rosh Hashanah, Yom Kippur, Sukkos the Festival of Tabernacles, Passover, etc.). He disregarded the one, infinite G-d of the Hebrew Bible in favor of a new ‘trinity’ [ No, pagan ‘Christianity’ did that. Yeshua NEVER claimed to BE God! John 17:3- Ed.] that included himself. And he repeatedly broke the Law by committing terrible sins, while openly challenging the G-d-given authority of the rabbis of the Sanhedrin.
[Yet no one could be found to testify against him at his ‘trial’, and he was killed by the Romans with the cooperation of the Sanhedrin, in direct violation of the written Torah of Moses. Ed.]
Naturally, Yeshua did sometimes pretend to respect the Law, but whenever he thought he could get away with it, he turned right around and broke that same Law. In Matthew 5:17-19, he declared that he came to fulfill the Law, and in Matthew 23:1-3 he defended the authority of the rabbis. [Due to a MIStranslation by the Bible translators!-Ed.] But the rest of the time, he rebelled against the Law thus showing that his occasional words of piety were meant only to hide his evil agenda. The following sins of Yeshua are recorded in the ‘New Testament’:
1) Yeshua repudiated the laws of kosher food (Mark 7:18-19). [Compare this to the prophet Daniel’s strict adherence to kashrus, in Daniel chapter 1.] [[These are RABBINIC laws, NOT Torah!]]
2) He repudiated the laws of honoring one’s parents, and called on his followers to hate their parents; he also dishonored his own mother (Matthew 10:34-36; Matthew 12:46-50; Luke 14:26).
3) He violated the Sabbath by picking grain, and incited his disciples to do the same (Matthew 12:1-8; Mark 2:23-26). [No, he violated the rabbinic prohibitions, NOT the Torah! Ed.]
4) He again violated the Sabbath by healing a man’s arm, which was not a matter of saving a life, and he openly defied the rabbis in his total repudiation of the Sabbath (Matthew 12:9-13; Mark 3:1-5 [Compare this to G-d’s view of violating the Sabbath, in Numbers 15:32-36, Nehemiah 10:30-32, and dozens of other places throughout the Bible.]
[BFL. No, he violated the rabbinic prohibitions, NOT the written Torah of Moses! Please note that they totally ignore the FACT that Yeshua COULD heal a man’s withered arm ! They do not even try to deny his powers ! Ed.]
5) Yeshua brazenly defied and disobeyed the rabbis of the Sanhedrin, repudiating their authority (This is recorded in many places throughout the New Testament, but look especially at Matthew 23:13-39 and John 8:44-45). [[AMEN! He identified them as ‘the synagogue of Satan’!-Ed.]]
The Talmud (Babylonian edition) records other sins of ‘Yeshua the Nazarene’:
1) He and his disciples practiced sorcery and black magic, led Jews astray into idolatry, and were sponsored by foreign, gentile powers for the purpose of subverting Jewish worship (Sanhedrin 43a). [[BFL. ZERO evidence from history to corroborate this charge.-Ed.]]
2) He was sexually immoral, worshipped statues of stone (a brick is mentioned), was cut off from the Jewish people for his wickedness, and refused to repent (Sanhedrin 107b; Sotah 47a). [[BFL. ZERO evidence from history to corroborate this charge.-Ed.]]
3) He learned witchcraft in Egypt and, to perform miracles, used procedures that involved cutting his flesh which is also explicitly banned in the Bible (Shabbos 104b). [[BFL. ZERO evidence from history to corroborate this charge.-Ed.]]
The false, rebellious message of Yeshua has been thoroughly rejected by the vast majority of the Jewish people, as G-d commanded. Unfortunately, however, this same message has brought a terrible darkness upon the world; today, over 1.5 billion gentiles believe in Yeshua. These lost souls mistakenly think they have found salvation in Yeshua; tragically, they are in for a rude awakening. Truth and eternal life are found directly from G-d, through performing His Law. Any ‘mediator’ only separates man from G-d:
1) ‘G-d is not a man, who can lie, nor the son of man, who relents. He has not beheld iniquity in Jacob, nor has He seen perverseness in Israel’ (Numbers 23:19). [This refers to the person of Israel, and surely not to the ‘children of Israel’, who are damned by YHVH Elohim for their violation of His covenant, for their stubborn rebelliousness, their myriad ‘whoredoms’ (worship of false Babylonian & Canaanite deities which continues to today witness the names of these false ‘gods’ which they have chosen for the names of the months of their calendar, Tammuz, etc., described by YHVH as ‘an abomination’. (Ezekiel 8:12-14)]
2) Speaking prophetically of the Christian church, Moses declared, ‘For their ‘rock’ is not like our Rock. Where is their god, in whom they trusted?’ (Deut. 32:31, 37). [BFL. These verses actually refer to the children of ISRAEL themselves, ‘Jeshurun’, how they will corrupt themselves, AFTER they enter the Promised Land. As in the ‘Jews’ in ‘Israel’ TODAY! (Isaiah 28:14) -Ed.]]
3) ‘‘See now that I, only I, am He, and there is no god with Me. I kill, and I bring to life; I wound, and I heal, and there is none who can rescue from My Hand.’ Sing songs of joy, gentiles, with His people, for He will avenge the blood of His servants, and will take vengeance on His enemies, and will forgive His land and His people’ (Deut. 32:39, 43).
4) ‘I, only I am HaShem [Literally, ‘the Name’, a typically sanctimonious Pharisaic reference to YHWH Ed.], and besides Me there is no savior’ (Isaiah 43:11).
5) ‘I am the First and I am the Last; besides me there is no god. Is there a god besides Me? There is no rock; I do not know any’ (Isaiah 44:6).
6) ‘Israel is saved in Hashem with an eternal salvation. Assemble yourselves and come, come near together, you gentiles who have escaped [the judgment]. (They have no knowledge, those who carry wooden sculptures and who pray to a god that does not save.) Announce and bring near, even take counsel together: Who declared this from ancient times, and announced it from then? Is it not I, Hashem? And there are no other gods beside Me, nor any righteous and saving god other than Me. Turn to Me and be saved, all ends of the earth, for I am G-d and there is none else. By Myself I swore, a righteous word went out of my mouth and it will not be withdrawn, that to Me every knee will bow and every tongue will swear’ (Isaiah 45:17, 20-23).
What is the true key to salvation? Those who return to the Law (the Seven Commandments for
the Children of Noah, according to the eternal covenant made with Noah in Genesis 9) and who assist the Jewish people (Isaiah 60, 61, 66) will be saved and will participate in the miracles and revelations, including worshipping in the Third Temple, under the kingship of the Messiah. [To many of these BOGUS bloodthirsty monsters, Jews ARE ‘the Messiah’, as is borne out in many of their other writings and teachings. Ed.] As described in many places, including Jeremiah 16:19-21 and Zechariah 8:20-23, all the old gentile religions of the world will disappear, and their followers will turn to the Jews for spiritual leadership. Until then, Christians are spiritually blinded, and cannot yet understand G-d’s wisdom in the Bible.
Ours is the last generation of the era of sin and evil and the first of the Messianic Era. Indeed, for the first time in history, there is a growing consensus of leading rabbis willing to name the man most suited to be the Messiah, and they are agreeing that he is the Lubavitcher Rebbe, Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson.
[So, this is how the identity of ‘the Messiah’ is going to be determined? It is an elective office? And only Jewish rabbis get to vote? Please, show us that in the Torah, or even in your diabolical Talmud. Oops! Sorry, boys. Your ‘messiah’ died. And, at last peek, was still rotting. Ed.]
The Rebbe is the spiritual leader of our generation, having boldly stirred up controversy over vital issues in which other leaders have remained tragically silent or have even caved in to the growing forces of darkness. He has upheld the Law perfectly [[Really? And which ‘Law’ was that? Surely NOT the written Torah of Moses, was it? Since, by your own admission, with your takanot and ma-asim, ‘the commandments of MEN, taught as doctrine’ (Isaiah 29:13), you have given yourselves the ‘authority’ to break the WRITTEN Torah of YHVH Elohim whenever you wish! And so with ‘the Rebbe’!- Ed.]] and has worked mightily to strengthen the observance of the Law by Jews, as well as the observance of the Noahide Law by gentiles. Through his teaching of chasidus (Jewish mystical teachings, preserved from Moses and Mount Sinai [[BFL. ZERO evidence from history to corroborate this charge.-Ed.]], he has taught the world that G-d is One, the Infinite Who renews creation at every moment. The Rebbe is a direct descendant of King David [NOT if he’s an Ashkenazim from Eastern Europe, he’s not! But they know that this cannot be explicitly DISproven, since the genealogical records were destroyed along with the Second Temple by the Roman General Titus in 68 A.D. Ed.] and has received a true prophecy from G-d that we who are alive in this generation shall be the first in history to see the coming of the true messiah. Many Jews are eagerly anticipating the Rebbe’s resurrection from the grave, ready to re-establish the Sanhedrin and anoint the king.
Our job is to finish preparing the way, by announcing the truth [[ They should choke when they print or say this!- Ed.]] and bringing all of mankind back to the Law immediately. Through our divinely mandated efforts, we shall now clear the path for the return of the Garden of Eden and the establishment of the eternal sinless world promised by Isaiah and the other Biblical prophets.
**** End of Noah’s Covenant ‘Manifesto’ ****
This information is included so that Christians who have no (or limited) prior exposure to the actual teachings of the Chabad Lubavitchers (there’s likely a Chabad synagogue near you!) and other similar racist, hate-based Jewish organizations, might come to understand just how real they are, how serious they are, and how much of a danger they constitute to those of us who intend to survive the imminent reign of the fake Jews’ AntiChrist, called the Great Tribulation.
The Talmud Satanic Hatred of Christians Codified . . .
Dr. Israel Shahak, in his work, Jewish History, Jewish Religion and Bernard Pick in Yeshua in the Talmud, (pp. 57; 105-106), have both confirmed the overt hatred and racism contained in the Talmud. Anyone who denies these deplorable characteristics of the Talmud, the Jews’ ‘holiest’
book, is a liar. Neither the modern popes nor the modern heads of evangelical Protestantism, have ever dared insist that the rabbis of Judaism repudiate or condemn the racism in the Talmud or the murderous hatred for Christ and Christians expressed within it . . ‘for fear of the Jews.’
On the contrary, the blind guides of ‘Churchianity’ have urged their ‘sheeple’ to love, honor and even to obey such evil, degenerate, blasphemous followers of the Godless, pagan Talmud as the
Chabad Lubavitcher, ‘The Rebbe’ Schneerson. Therefore, it should be quite evident that such leaders of Christendom are by default, among the worst betrayers of Yeshua Messiah on earth.
The Synagogue of Satan . . .
As previously mentioned, in the Book of the Revelation, the Lord Yeshua refers to some who call themselves Jews (Greek ioudaios/ioudaios, ‘Judeans’) but who are not such according to the Father or him, and it is apparent that this is not a good thing for them nor for the Church:
8 And unto the angel of the church in Smyrna write; These things says the First and the Last, which was dead, and is alive;
9 I know your works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but you are rich) and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan. [Revelation 2:9]
And again:
7 And to the angel of the church in Philadelphia write; These things says He that is holy, He that is true, He that has the key of David, He that opens, and no man shuts; and shuts, and no man opens;
8 I know your works: behold, I have set before you an open door, and no man can shut it: for you have a little strength, and have kept my word, and have not denied my name.
9 Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie; behold, I will make them to come and worship before your feet, and to know that I have loved you. [Revelation 3:9]
It remains to be seen to whom this refers. Let us recall some of our Lord’s descriptions of the Pharisees of His day:
1 Then came to Yeshua scribes and Pharisees, which were of Jerusalem, saying,
2 Why do your disciples transgress the tradition of the elders? for they wash not their hands when they eat bread.
3 But he answered and said unto them, Why do you also transgress the commandment of God by your traditions?
4 For God commanded, saying, Honor your father and mother: and, He that curses father or mother, let him die the death.
5 But you say, Whosoever shall say to his father or his mother, ‘It is corban’ (dedicated to the Temple), concerning whatsoever of mine you might have been profited;
6 And honor not his father or his mother, he shall be free. Thus have you made the commandment of God of no effect by your traditions.
7 You hypocrites, well did Isaiah prophesy of you (Isaiah 29:13), saying,
8 ‘This people draws near to Me with their mouth, and honors Me with their lips; but their heart is far from Me.
9 But in vain they do worship Me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men.’ [Matthew 15:1-9]
And this:
1 Then spoke Yeshua to the multitude, and to his disciples,
2 Saying, The scribes and the Pharisees sit in Moses’ seat:
3 All therefore whatsoever HE (Moses!) bids you observe, that observe and do; but do not you after THEIR works: for they say, and do not. [According to the Shem Tov Hebrew Gospel of Matthew!]
4 For they bind heavy burdens and grievous to be borne, and lay them on men’s shoulders; but they themselves will not move them with one of their fingers.
5 But all their works they do to be seen of men: they make broad their phylacteries, and enlarge the borders of their garments,
6 And love the uppermost rooms at feasts, and the chief seats in the synagogues,
7 And greetings in the markets, and to be called of men, Rabbi, Rabbi.
8 But do not be called Rabbi: for one is your Master, even Christ; and all you are brethren.
9 And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven.
10 Neither be called masters: for one is your Master, even Christ.
11 But he that is greatest among you shall be your servant.
12 And whosoever shall exalt himself shall be abased; and he that shall humble himself shall be exalted.
13 But woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for you shut up the kingdom of heaven against men: for you neither go in yourselves, neither do you allow them that would enter to go in.
14 Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for you devour widows’ houses, and for a pretence make long prayer: therefore you shall receive the greater damnation.
15 Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for you search sea and land to make one convert, and when he is made, you make him twofold more the child of hell than yourselves.
16 Woe unto you, you blind guides, which say, ‘Whosoever shall swear by the temple, it is nothing; but whosoever shall swear by the gold of the temple, he is bound!’
17 You fools and blind: for whether is greater, the gold, or the temple that sanctifies the gold?
18 And, ‘Whosoever shall swear by the altar, it is nothing; but whosoever swears by the gift that is upon it, he is bound.’
19 You fools and blind: for whether is greater, the gift, or the altar that sanctifies the gift?
20 Whoso therefore shall swear by the altar, swears by it, and by all things thereon.
21 And whoso shall swear by the temple, swears by it, and by him that dwells therein.
22 And he that shall swear by heaven, swears by the throne of God, and by him that sits thereon.
23 Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for you pay tithe of mint and anise and cumin, and have omitted the weightier matters of the law, judgment, mercy, and faith: these you ough

{ Add a Comment }

Merry Christmas and a Happy, Hopeful New Year from RadicalPress.com

MerryChristmasA&STopham

Dear Radical Readers and Friends of Freedom of Speech Everywhere,
On behalf of my wife Shastah and myself I would like to thank everyone who has been standing with RadicalPress.com over the past year and longer in my ongoing struggle to defend the legal right of all Canadians, as stated in the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, to be able to express their thoughts and viewpoints on the Internet and in other media without fear of being attacked and persecuted by the government of Canada via the use of Sec. 319(2) of the Criminal Code.
This past year saw the case move to the actual stage of trial which commenced in the B.C. Supreme Court, Quesnel, Canada on October 26, 2015 and ran until November 12, 2015 when the jury of 8 women and 4 men found me guilty in Count 1 and not guilty in Count 2 of the identical charge that I did ‘willfully promote hatred against an identifiable group, people of the Jewish religion or ethnic origin, contrary to Section 319(2) of the Criminal Code.’
As a result of this peculiar and strange ruling the stage has been now set for the continuation of my Charter challenge to Sec. 319(2) in the coming new year. The time when this challenge will occur is yet to be determined but the week beginning January 25, 2016 will see a date fixed for the Constitutional argument to be heard.
In the event that my Charter argument fails to convince the Supreme Court that Sec. 319(2) is in violation of Sec. 2b of Canada’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms then I will then have the right to appeal the decision of the court on Count 1 that was handed down November 12, 2015.
There were a number of extenuating circumstances that arose during the actual trial which will, of necessity, come to the forefront in the appeal and portend a strong case for having the decision tossed out and a not guilty decision rendered. Space here doesn’t allow for any elaboration on the process but the new evidence will be forthcoming in the new year.
As of today I am still raising money in order to purchase the transcripts from the trial. Not only does the legal process in this country unfairly work against the individual through unjust legislation such as Sec. 319(2) of the criminal code but when forced to defend oneself against such specious forms of ‘thought crime’ laws the costs incurred are then further exacerbated by the state in the form of the victim having to pay exorbitant costs for the transcripts of the proceedings in order to continue on with their defence.
As it now stands the transcripts will cost me $7,500.00 to purchase from the sole contractor to the Attorney General’s office in B.C. JCWord Assist Ltd. The amount of support and funding for this onerous and ridiculously unfair process of procuring the transcripts has been overwhelmingly positive and to date we have already raised over $7,000.00 toward this end. I am deeply appreciative and humbled by this generosity on the part of supporters world-wide who’ve found it in their hearts to help me out. The transcripts are vital to my defence and will prove extremely useful in the days ahead as this battle to retain our right to freedom of speech continues to unfold in the Supreme Court of Canada.
The transcripts though are not the only expenses that I face and therefore I am forced to continue to ask for financial assistance and will likely do so until the process wends its way to a final outcome. It’s for this reason that I must therefore append my donation ‘shingle’ to this Christmas greeting as well.
As the new year approaches I am filled with hope, strength and an unwavering determination to carry on with this fight until the odious sections of our legal system that make it a criminal act to speak one’s mind are defeated and repealed once and for all.
The world today stands at the brink of despair and hope. Never has there been a more urgent time in our history for the people to be able to stand up and speak out for their basic human rights in order to defend their nation against the incredibly powerful and deceptive actions of their respective governments and media; political bodies and complicit agencies who have shown themselves, over and over, to be working against the fundamental rights of the individual in order to broaden the scope of their control and propaganda now being forced upon the minds and hearts of people around the globe all at the behest of special interest groups who wield, altogether, untold amounts of unwarranted power and influence over nation states worldwide.
2016 bodes well in terms of providing the impetus to speak out and be heard. Let us pray that vigilance and discernment will be the watchwords in the days ahead and that we will retain our basic rights and continue to live freely and in peace and harmony with all of humanity.
May God bless the peacemakers and all who strive for justice and truth!
Sincerely,
Arthur Topham
Pub/Ed
The Radical Press
Canada’s Radical News Network

{ Add a Comment }

When Truth Becomes ‘Anti-Semitic’: What World Famous People Say About Jews and Zionism

In a recent screed of January 10, 2009 (The ‘Oldest Hatred’ Lives, from Gaza to Florida http://www.ocregister.com/articles/hamas-gaza-jewish-2277487-muslims-state ) outlining a list of relatively minor examples of anti-Jewish sentiment resulting from Israel’s current butchery of the defenseless Palestinians of Gaza, Canadian journalist Mark Steyn, one of Zionism’s key literary brokers for North America’s Jewish-owned media cartel, attempts to lay the blame for the growing public outrage on the doorstep of Palestine’s democratically elected government Hamas along with other Islamic extremists, Muslims and anyone, anywhere expressing ‘anti-Zionist’ sentiments.

After listing off his abbreviated litany of ‘anti-Semitic’ attacks upon various Jewish individuals and groups he writes, ‘Forget, for the moment, Gaza. Forget that the Palestinian people are the most comprehensively wrecked people on the face of the earth. For the past sixty years they have been entrusted to the care of the United Nations, the Arab League, the PLO, Hamas and the ‘global community’ — and the results are pretty much what you’d expect’ all the while conveniently leaving out of his deceptively narrative description the blatant historic fact that it was the newly-formed Israeli government itself who, via mendacity and sheer ill-will and bloody terror, drove the legal inhabitants of Palestine out of their homes and villages and into that hideous concentration camp we now know as Gaza.

This simplistic and transparent ploy by Steyn to high jack the legitimate concerns of people around the world via jingoist sophistry and twisted argument in favour of the worn canard of ‘anti-Semitism’ falls flat in the face of an abundance of gross images of mutilated, dead and dying Palestinian children, women and elderly, yet this doesn’t deter him in his vainglorious denial of the truth from continuing to ride his blood-steyned steed further into the fray of unabashed Zionist media propaganda, thrashing about with his sword of lies and brandishing his bullet-ridden ‘anti-Semite’ banner one flapping madly about in the righteous winds of vehement feelings of horror expressed by decent people around the planet incensed and ashamed that such despicable acts of cruel and wanton bloodshed could still be committed against the human family at the beginning of the 21 Century.

But let’s, as Steyn says, ‘forget Gaza’ ‘and instead ponder the reaction to Gaza in Scandinavia, France, the United Kingdom, Canada, and golly, even Florida. As the delegitimization of Israel has metastasized, we are assured that criticism of the Jewish state is not the same as anti-Semitism. We are further assured that anti-Zionism is not the same as anti-Semitism, which is a wee bit more of a stretch. Only Israel attracts an intellectually respectable movement querying its very existence.’

In a token of submission to the Zionist god of cunning and perfidy Steyn tries comparing Israel with the state of Pakistan as part of recent political machinations and Mossad false flag operations by the Zionist-controlled US government to vilify Pakistan before eventually attacking it as yet another rogue, ‘terrorist’ state. Of Pakistan, and with obvious intent to deflect attention from Israel, Steyn sardonically states, ‘I happen to think the creation of Pakistan was the greatest failure of post-war British imperial policy.’

Steyn’s culminating and rather crass attempt to convince his western readers that all who reject Zionism are in fact Jew-hating bigots, hypocrites and ‘anti-Semites’ is eventually steeped in a feeble flourish of anti-Muslim artistry, punctuated with an excerpt from the Syrian poet, Nizar Qabbani, suggesting that the people of Gaza are all ‘mad’. And why are they mad? Why because, as Steyn so lucidly tells us, they exhibit ‘the enthusiastic adoption of the same pathologies’ that mainstream Europe is now expressing in their ‘anti-Semitic’ attacks but of course the Palestinians are even ‘more deranged — and in the end’ their resistance to the phosphorus bombs and DU bullets of Israeli justice ‘will prove just as self-destructive.’

Such is the ethereal substance of the Zionist media’s #1 propaganda broker Mark Steyn. If you don’t approve of the butcher’s banquet that Israel and its pro-Zionist supporters around the world are feasting upon then by definition you are ‘anti-Semitic’ and a Jew-hater.

Which brings me now to the list of world famous people, who by Steyn’s and Zionism’s definition, fit the description of ‘anti-Semite’. It was one of these people listed, H.H. Beamish who, in a New York address in October 1937 made the following observation:

‘In 1848 the word ‘anti-Semitic’ was invented by the Jews to prevent the use of the word ‘Jew.’ The right word for them is ‘Jew’ …’

Like gemstones and special treats of food I would guess that almost everybody loves reading quotes. The ones that follow are the most comprehensive list related to the issue of ‘anti-Semitism’ that I am aware of. They are offered here to the internet community as one small token of respect for the inhumane suffering of the Palestinian people of all of Palestine and the Arab world in general. They are also dedicated to those brave truth-seeking men and women who now languish in German prisons because they had the fortitude, the fore-knowledge and the courage to question the Zionist Lie. God bless and keep them all safe from any further harm.

If readers of these quotes feel they are being wrongly accused by the likes of Mark Steyn and the Zionist warlords I am certain that by the time they complete reading them they will not feel alone in their gut reaction to what is going on in Gaza today.
——

‘In the beginning was the word and the word was that the Talmudic Jews were anathema to universal justice and peace for all non-Jewish peoples of the earth.‘
~ Arthur Topham, January 13, 2009

Famous Quotes by Famous People on Jews and Zionism

CICERO (Marcus Tullius Cicero). First century B.C. Roman stateman, writer.

‘Softly! Softly! I want none but the judges to hear me. The Jews have already gotten me into a fine mess, as they have many other gentleman. I have no desire to furnish further grist for their mills.’ (Oration in Defense of Flaccus)

Cicero was serving as defense counsel at the trial of Flaccus, a Roman official who interfered with Jewish gold shipments to their international headquarters (then, as now) in Jerusalem. Cicero himself certainly was not a nobody, and for one of this stature to have to ‘speak softly’ shows that he was in the presence of a dangerously powerful sphere of influence.

and on another occasion Cicero wrote:

‘The Jews belong to a dark and repulsive force. One knows how numerous this clique is, how they stick together and what power they exercise through their unions. They are a nation of rascals and deceivers.’

SENECA (Lucius Annaeus Seneca). First century Roman philosopher.

‘The customs of that most criminal nation have gained such strength that they have now been received in all lands. The conquered have given laws to the conquerors.’ (De Superstitione)

DIO CASSIUS. Second century Roman historian. Describing the savage Jewish uprising against the Roman empire that has been acknowledged as the turning point downward in the course of that great state-form:

‘The Jews were destroying both Greeks and Romans. They ate the flesh of their victims, made belts for themselves out of their entrails, and daubed themselves with their blood… In all, 220,000 men perished in Cyrene and 240,000 in Cyprus, and for this reason no Jew may set foot in Cyprus today.’ (Roman History)

DIODORUS SICULUS. First century Greek historian. Observed that Jews treated other people as enemies and inferiors.

‘Usury’ is the practice of lending money at excessive interest rates. This has for centuries caused great misery and poverty for Gentiles. It has brought strong condemnation of the Jews!

BERNARDINO OF FELTRO. 15th century Italian priest. A mild man who extolled patience and charity in normal circumstances, he described himself as a ‘barking dog’ when dealing with Jews:

‘Jewish usurers bleed the poor to death and grow fat on their substance, and I who live on alms, who feed on the bread of the poor, shall I then be mute before outraged charity? Dogs bark to protect those who feed them, and I, who am fed by the poor, shall I see them robbed of what belongs to them and keep silent?’ (E. Flornoy, Le Bienbeureux Bernardin the Feltre)

AQUINAS, THOMAS, Saint. 13th century scholastic philosopher. In his ‘On the Governance of the Jews,’ he wrote:

‘The Jews should not be allowed to keep what they have obtained from others by usury; it were best that they were compelled to work so that they could earn their living instead of doing nothing but becoming avaricious.’

HILAIRE BELLOC, in the book THE JEWS, page 9:

‘There is already something like a Jewish monopoly in high finance … There is the same element of Jewish monopoly in the silver trade, and in the control of various other metals, notably lead, nickel, quicksilver. What is most disquieting of all, this tendency to monopoly is spreading like a disease.’

H. H. BEAMISH, in New York Speech, October 30, 1937:

‘The Boer War occurred 37 years ago. Boer means farmer. Many criticized a great power like Britain for trying to wipe out the Boers. Upon making inquiry, I found all the gold and diamond mines of South Africa were owned by Jews; that Rothschild controlled gold; Samuels controlled silver, Baum controlled other mining, and Moses controlled base metals. Anything these people touch they inevitably pollute.’

W. HUGHES, Premier of Australia, Saturday Evening Post, June 19, 1919:

‘The Montefiores have taken Australia for their own, and there is not a gold field or a sheep run from Tasmania to New South Wales that does not pay them a heavy tribute. They are the real owners of the antipodean continent. What is the good of our being a wealthy nation, if the wealth is all in the hands of German Jews?’

POPE CLEMENT VIII:

‘All the world suffers from the usury of the Jews, their monopolies and deceit. They have brought many unfortunate people into a state of poverty, especially the farmers, working class people and the very poor.

Then as now Jews have to be reminded intermittently anew that they were enjoying rights in any country since they left Palestine and the Arabian desert, and subsequently their ethical and moral doctrines as well as their deeds rightly deserve to be exposed to criticism in whatever country they happen to live.’

NESTA WEBSTER, In World Revolution, The Plot against Civilization, page 163:

‘Since the earliest times it is as the exploiter that the Jew has been known amongst his fellow men of all races and creeds. Moreover, he has persistently shown himself ungrateful… The Jews have always formed a rebellious element in every state.’

FRANZ LISZT, famed composer quoted in Col. E. N. Sanctuary’s Are These Things So?, page 278:

‘The day will come when all nations amidst which the Jews are dwelling will have to raise the question of their wholesale expulsion, a question which will be one of life or death, good health or chronic disease, peaceful existence or perpetual social fever.’

JESUS CHRIST, speaking to the Jews in the Gospel of St. John, VIII:44:

‘Ye are of your father the devil, and the lust of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is not truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar and the father of it. then answered the Jews ’ (which makes it clear that Christ was addressing the Jews.)

MARTIN LUTHER, Table Talk of Martin Luther, translated by William Hazlett, Esq. page 43:

‘But the Jews are so hardened that they listen to nothing; though overcome by testimonies they yield not an inch. It is a pernicious race, oppressing all men by their usury and rapine. If they give a prince or magistrate a thousand florins, they extort twenty thousand from the subjects in payment. We must ever keep on guard against them.’

REV. GORDON WINROD, in his book The Keys to Christian Understanding, pages 114 115:

‘Judaism does not know Jesus Christ. Judaism hates Jesus Christ. When St. Paul was in Judaism, before he was converted to Christianity, he hated Jesus Christ and persecuted Christians and Christianity.’

Paul said: ‘You have heard of my earlier career in Judaism how furiously I persecuted the Church of God, and made havoc of it; and how in devotion to Judaism I out-stripped many men of my own age among my people, being far more zealous than they for the tradition of my forefathers.’ (Gal. 1:13, 14, Weymouth Translation)

While in Judaism, Paul persecuted Christians because of his intense hatred for Christians and because of his conformity to the tradition of the fathers. This shows that the tradition of teachings of Judaism are filled with hate for Christians.

Few people know of this because they do not carefully read their Scriptures and because of the great pains which Jews have take to deceive the Christians. Care has been exerted by the Jews to hide their ECONOMIC-POLITICAL conspiracy for complete world domination UNDER high sounding words that have a ‘RELIGIOUS’ ring in the ears of Christians.

The Jews use such ‘religious’ sounding words as ‘the Jewish faith,’ ‘the Jewish religion,’ ‘Jewish spiritual values,’ ‘Jewish religious doctrines,’ and like phrases which deceive and lead the unlearned into total equanimity.

Behind this mask of religiosity stands a complete plan for world government, world power, world conquest, a Jewish kingdom of this world, and the destruction of Christianity.

REV. WILLIAM S. MITCHELL of Philadelphia, quoted in Count Cherep-Spiridovich’s book The Secret World Government, page 194:

‘If there is an ingrate in history, it is the Jew. In this land which befriended him he as conspired, plotted, undermined, prostituted and corrupted and (hiding to this hour behind the braver screen of other folks), dares to contrive and scheme the death of every Christian principle which has protected him.’

ST. JUSTIN, martyr stated in 116 A. D.:

‘The Jews were behind all the persecutions of the Christians. They wandered through the country everywhere hating and undermining the Christian faith.’

ST. JOHN, Gospel of St. John VII:1:

‘After these things Jesus walked in Galilee: for he would not walk in Jewry because the Jews sought to kill him.’

M. H. DE HEEKELINGEN, in Israel: Son Passe, Son Avenir:

‘The former Rabbi Drach, converted to Catholicism, says that the Talmud contains ‘a large number of musing, utterly ridiculous extravagancies, most revolting indecencies, and, above all, the most horrible blasphemies against everything which the Christian religion holds most sacred and most dear.’

‘In the matter of the translation of the Talmud by non-Jews, we have always preferred that of Luzsensky, whose accuracy has been established by the Courts. In 1923, the Public Prosecutor of Hungary caused his Hungarian Talmud to be seized on account of ‘attack on public morals’ and ‘pornography.’ In delivering its verdict, the Court declared ‘INTER ALIA:

‘The horrors contained in the translation of Alfred Luzsensky are to be found, without exception, in the Talmud. His translation is correct, in that it renders these passages, which are actually to be found in the original text of the Talmud, after their true meaning.’

QUINTAS SPETIMUS FLORENS TERTULLIAN (160 230 A. D.) Latin Church Father:

‘The Jews formed the breeding ground of all anti-Christian actions.’

REV. MARTIN LUTHER, sermon at Eisleben, a few days before his death, February, 1546:

‘Besides, you also have many Jews living in the country, who do much harm… You should know the Jews blaspheme and violate the name of our Savior day for day… for that reason you, Milords and men of authority, should not tolerate but expel them. They are our public enemies and incessantly blaspheme our Lord Jesus Christ, they call our Blessed Virgin Mary a harlot and her Holy Son a bastard and to us they give the epithet of changelings and abortions.

Therefore deal with them harshly as they do nothing but excruciatingly blaspheme our Lord Jesus Christ, trying to rob us of our lives, our health, our honor and belongings.’

MARIA THERESA, Queen of Hungary and Bohemia (1771 1789):

‘Henceforth no Jew, no matter under what name, will be allowed to remain here without my written permission. I know of no other troublesome pest within the state than this race, which impoverished the people by their fraud, usury and money-lending and commit all deeds which an honorable man despises. Subsequently they have to be removed and excluded from here as much as possible.’

(The Universal Jewish Encyclopedia states that ‘The Talmud is the real ‘bible’ of the Jews and that it supersedes the Old Testament. This volume has been condemned down through the ages for preaching hatred for Christ and all Christians. Read ‘THE TALMUD UNMASKED’ for the full shocking details.)

DIDEROT, DENIS. 18th century French scholar.

His famous ENCYCLOPEDIE, the bible of the pre-revolutionary French ‘enlightenment,’ has often been complained of by Jewish writers as ‘anti-Semitic.’ Some of Diderot’s other writings are likewise quite frank:

‘And you, angry and brutish people, vile and vulgar men, slaves worthy of the yoke [Talmudism] which you bear … Go, take back your books and remove yourselves from me. (LA MOISADE)

[The Talmud] taught the Jews to steal the goods of Christians, to regard them as savage beasts, to push them over the precipice … to kill them with impunity and to utter every morning the most horrible imprecations against them. (JUIFS)

NASTA WEBSTER, in Secret Societies and Subversive Movements, page 370:

‘The Jewish conception of the Jews as the Chosen People who must eventually rule the world forms indeed the basis of Rabbinical Judaism… The Jewish religion now takes its stand on the Talmud rather than on the Bible.’

F. TROCASE, in Jewish Austria:

‘No obstacle discourages them; they persevere throughout the world, throughout the centuries, the unity of their race. The Talmud has given them a powerful organization which modern progress has been unable to change. Deep, ineradicable hatred of everything that is not Jewish stimulates them in war which they wage against Christian Society, which is too divided to be able to fight with the necessary energy.’

COUNT HELMUTH VON MOLTKE, Prussian general:

‘The Jews form a state, and, obeying their own laws, they evade those of their host country. The Jews always consider an oath regarding a Christian not binding. During the Campaign of 1812 the Jews were spies, they were paid by both sides, they betrayed both sides.’

MOHAMMED, in the Koran:

‘Whoever is a friend of a Jew, belong to them, becomes one of them, God cannot tolerate this mean people. The Jews have wandered from divine religion. You must not relent in your work which must show up Jewish deceit.’

BACON, FRANCIS. 16th century British writer, politician.

In his The New Atlantis, he remarked that Jews,

‘hate the name of Christ and have a secret and innate rancor against the people among whom they live.’

He also disapproved of non-Jewish usurers as ‘Judaizers’ who would wear ‘tawny bonnets’ like Jews.

LUTHER, MARTIN. 16th century German religious reformer.

‘They are the real liars and bloodhounds, who have not only perverted and falsified the entire Scriptures from beginning to end and without ceasing with their interpretations. And all of the anxious sighing, longing and hoping of their hearts is directed to the time when some day they would like to deal with us heathen as they dealt with the heathen in Persia at the time of Esther… On how they love the book of Esther, which so nicely agrees with their bloodthirsty, revengeful and murderous desire and hope.

The sun never did shine on a more bloodthirsty and revengeful people as they, who imagine to be the people of God, and who desire to and think they must murder and crush the heathen. And the foremost undertaking which they expect of their Messiah is that he should slay and murder the whole world with the sword. As they at first demonstrated against us Christians and would like to do now, if they only could; have also tried it often and have been repeatedly struck on their snouts…

Their breath stinks for the gold and silver of the heathen; since no people under the sun always have been, still are, and always will remain more avaricious than they, as can be noticed in their cursed usury. They also find comfort with this: ‘When the Messiah comes, He shall take all the gold and silver in the world and distribute it among the Jews.

Thus, wherever they can direct Scripture to their insatiable avarice, they wickedly do so.

Therefore know, my dear Christians, that next to the Devil, you have no more bitter, more poisonous, more vehement an enemy than a real Jew who earnestly desires to be a Jew. There may be some among them who believe what the cow or the goose believes. But all of them are surrounded with their blood and circumcision. In history, therefore, they are often accused of poisoning wells, stealing children and mutilating them; as in Trent, Weszensee and the like. Of course they deny this. Be it so or not, however, I know full well that the ready will is not lacking with them if they could only transform it into deeds, in secret or openly.

A person who does not know the Devil, might wonder why they are so at enmity with the Christians above all others; for which they have no reason, since we only do good to them.

They live among us in our homes, under our protection, use land and highways, market and streets. Princes and government sit by, snore and have their maws open, let the Jews take from their purse and chest, steal and rob whatever they will. That is, they permit themselves and their subjects to be abused and sucked dry and reduced to beggars with their own money, through the usury of the Jews. For the Jews, as foreigners, certainly should have nothing from us; and what they have certainly must be ours. They do not work, do not earn anything from us, neither do we donate or give it to them. Yet they have our money and goods and are lords in our land where they are supposed to be in exile!

If a thief steals ten gulden he must hang; if he robs people on the highway, his head is gone. But a Jew, when he steals ten tons of gold through his usury is dearer than God himself!

Do not their TALMUD and rabbis write that it is no sin to kill if a Jew kills a heathen, but it is a sin if he kills a brother in Israel? It is no sin if he does not keep his oath to a heathen. Therefore, to steal and rob (as they do with their moneylending) from a heathen, is a divine service… And they are the masters of the world and we are their servants yea, their cattle!

I maintain that in three fables of Aesop there is more wisdom to be found than in all the books of the Talmudists and rabbis and more than ever could come into the hearts of the Jews…

Should someone think I am saying too much I am saying much too little! For I see in [their] writings how they curse us Goyim and wish us all evil in their schools and prayers. They rob us of our money through usury, and wherever they are able, they play us all manner of mean tricks… No heathen has done such things and none would to so except the Devil himself and those whom he possesses as he possesses the Jews.

Burgensis, who was a very learned rabbi among them and by the grace of God became a Christian (which seldom occurs), is much moved that in their schools they so horribly curse us Christians (as Lyra also writes) and from that draws the conclusion that they must not be the people of God.

Now behold what a nice, thick, fat lie it is when they complain about being captives among us! Jerusalem was destroyed more than 1,400 years ago during that time we Christians have been tortured and persecuted by the Jews in all the world. On top of that, we do not know to this day what Devil brought them into our country. We did not fetch them from Jerusalem!… Yes, we have and hold them captive, as I would like to keep my rheumatism, and all other diseases and misfortunes, who must wait as a poor servant, with money and property and everything I have! I wish they were in Jerusalem with the other Jews and whomsoever they would like to have with them.

Now what are we going to do with these rejected, condemned Jewish people?… Let us apply the ordinary wisdom of other nations like France, Spain, Bohemia, et al., who made them give an account of what they had stolen through usury, and divided it evenly; but expelled them from their country;. For as heard before, God’s wrath is so great over them that through soft mercy they only become more wicked, through hard treatment, however, only a little better. Therefore, away with them!

How much more unbearable it is that we should permit the entire Christendom and all of us to be bought with our own money, be slandered and cursed by the Jews, who on top of all that be made rich and our lords, who laugh us to scorn and are tickled by their audacity!

What a joyful affair that would be for the Devil and his angels, and cause them to laugh through their snouts like a sow grinning at her little pigs, but deserving real wrath before God. (From THE JEWS AND THEIR LIES)

Maybe mild-hearted and gentle Christians will believe that I am too rigorous and drastic against the poor, afflicted Jews, believing that I ridicule them and treat them with much sarcasm. By my word, I am far too weak to be able to ridicule such a satanic brood. I would fain to do so, but they are far greater adepts at mockery than I and possess a god who is master in this art. It is the Evil One himself.

Even with no further evidence than the Old Testament, I would maintain, and no person on earth could alter my opinion, that the Jews as they are today are veritably a mixture of all the depraved and malevolent knaves of the whole world over, who have then been dispersed in all countries, similarly to the Tartars, Gypsies and such folk.’

WASHINGTON, GEORGE, in Maxims of George Washington by A. A. Appleton & Co.

‘They (the Jews) work more effectively against us, than the enemy’s armies. They are a hundred times more dangerous to our liberties and the great cause we are engaged in… It is much to be lamented that each state, long ago, has not hunted them down as pest to society and the greatest enemies we have to the happiness of America.’

This prophecy, by Benjamin Franklin, was made in a ‘CHIT CHAT AROUND THE TABLE DURING INTERMISSION,’ at the Philadelphia Constitutional Convention of 1787. This statement was recorded in the dairy of Charles Cotesworth Pinckney, a delegate from South Carolina.

‘I fully agree with General Washington, that we must protect this young nation from an insidious influence and impenetration. The menace, gentlemen, is the Jews.

In whatever country Jews have settled in any great number, they have lowered its moral tone; depreciated its commercial integrity; have segregated themselves and have not been assimilated; have sneered at and tried to undermine the Christian religion upon which that nation is founded, by objecting to its restrictions; have built up a state within the state; and when opposed have tried to strangle that country to death financially, as in the case of Spain and Portugal.

For over 1,700 years, the Jews have been bewailing their sad fate in that they have been exiled from their homeland, as they call Palestine. But gentlemen, did the world give it to them in fee simple, they would at once find some reason for not returning. Why? Because they are vampires, and vampires do not live on vampires. They cannot live only among themselves. They must subsist on Christians and other people not of their race.

If you do not exclude them from these United States, in their Constitution, in less than 200 years they will have swarmed here in such great numbers that they will dominate and devour the land and change our form of government, for which we Americans have shed our blood, given our lives our substance and jeopardized our liberty.

If you do not exclude them, in less than 200 years our descendants will be working in the fields to furnish them substance, while they will be in the counting houses rubbing their hands. I warn you, gentlemen, if you do not exclude Jews for all time, your children will curse you in your graves.

Jews, gentlemen, are Asiatics, let them be born where they will nor how many generations they are away from Asia, they will never be otherwise. Their ideas do not conform to an American’s, and will not even though they live among us ten generations. A leopard cannot change its spots. Jews are Asiatics, are a menace to this country if permitted entrance, and should be excluded by this Constitutional Convention.

STYVESANT, PETER. 17th century Dutch governor in America.

‘The Jews who have arrived would nearly all like to remain here, but learning that they (with their customary usury and deceitful trading with the Christians) were very repugnant to the inferior magistrates, as also to the people having the most affection for you; the Deaconry also fearing that owing to their present indigence they might become a charge in the coming winter, we have, for the benefit of this weak newly developing place and land in general, deemed it useful to require them in a friendly way to depart; praying also most seriously in this connection, for ourselves also for the general community of your worships, that the deceitful race such hateful enemies and blasphemers of the name of Christ not be allowed further to infect and trouble this new colony. (Letter to the Amsterdam Chamber of the Dutch West India Company, from New Amsterdam, September 22, 1654.)

The Jews whom he attempted to oust merely applied to their fellow Jews in Holland, and the order came back from the Company countermanding the expulsion. (For a similar situation during the Civil War, see ULYSSES GRANT). Among the reasons given by ‘their worships’ for over-ruling their governor, one stands out rather glaringly, in view of the usual Jewish contention that their people were ‘poor and persecuted:’ ’ …and also because of the large amount of capital which they have invested in shares of this Company.’ (Harry Golden and Martin Rywell, THE JEWS IN AMERICAN HISTORY )

THE GEORGIA COLONY IN AMERICA. On January 5, 1734, the trustees ordered that three Jews who had been sending coreligionists into the colony without authorization ‘use their endeavors that the said Jews may be removed from the Colony of Georgia, as the best and only satisfaction that they can give to the Trustees for such an indignity offered to Gentlemen acting under His Majesty’s Charter.’ (C. Jones, HISTORY OF SAVANNAH)

JEFFERSON, THOMAS. 18th century American statesman.

‘Dispersed as the Jews are, they still form one nation, foreign to the land they live in. ’ (D. Boorstin, THE AMERICANS)

‘Those who labor in the earth are the Chosen People of God, if ever he had a chosen people. ’ (NOTES ON VIRGINIA)

BEAMISH, HENRY H. 20th century British publisher.

‘There is no need to be delicate on this Jewish question. You must face them in this country. The Jew should be satisfied here. I was here forty-seven years ago; your doors were thrown open and you were then free. Now he has got you absolutely by the throat that is their reward. ’ (New York speech, October 30, 1937)

HARRINGTON, LORD. 19th century British statesman.

Opposed admission of Jewish immigrants to England because:

‘They are the great moneylenders and loan contractors of the world… The consequence is that the nations of the world are groaning under heavy systems of taxation and national debt. They have ever been the greatest enemies of freedom. (Speech in the House of Lords, July 12, 1858)

WALTER CRICK, British Manufacturer, in the NORTHAMPTON DAILY ECHO, March 19. 1925:

‘Jews can destroy by means of finance. Jews are International. Control of credits in this country is not in the hands of the English, but of Jews. It has become the biggest danger the British Empire ever had to face.’

WORLD FAMOUS MEN of the past accused the Jews of founding Communism. This charge is well founded. The Communist philosopy was drawn up by Karl Marx who descended from a long line of Rabbis. His ideology of anti-Christian and Socialist thought is outlined in the Jewish ‘TALMUD’ which is the ‘bible’ of the Jews. Of the four political groups which overthrew the Christan Czar of Russia two were 100% Jewish. They were the Mensheviks and The Jewish Bund. The other two were the Socialist Revolutionary Party and the Bolsheviks. Both were headed by Jews but had some Gentile members. Today we now know that Lenin was Jewish and all of the leaders of his first government were Jews. They were Trotsky, Zinoviev, Kamenev and Sverdlow. The wealthiest Jewish banker in the world at that time, Jacob Schiff of Kuhn, Loeb investment bank of New York City, gave Trotsky and Lenin $20 million to overthrow the Czar and establish the Soviet tyranny (according to the ‘NEW YORK JOURNAL-AMERICAN’ of February 3, 1949.)

CHURCHILL, WINSTON. 20th century British politician.

In 1920, he wrote a long newspaper article of the recent Bolshevik seizure of Russia. After praising what he called the ‘national Jews’ of Russia, he said:

‘In violent opposition to all this sphere of Jewish efforts rise the schemes of the International Jews. The adherents of this sinister confederacy are mostly men reared up among the unhappy populations of countries where Jews are persecuted on account of their race. Most, if not all, of them have forsaken the faith of their forefathers, and divorced from their minds all spiritual hopes of the next world. This movement among the Jews is not new. From the days of Spartacus-Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun (Hungary), Rosa Luxemburg (Germany), and Emma Goldman (United States), this world-wide revolutionary conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily growing. It played, as a modern writer, Mrs. Webster has ably shown, a definite recognizable part in the tragedy of the French Revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the Nineteenth Century; and now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworlds of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads and have become practically the undisputed masters of the enormous empire.

There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creating of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international and for the most part atheistic Jews. It is certainly the very great one; it probably outweighs all others. With the notable exception of Lenin, [now questionably of Jewish origin too. Ed.] the majority of the leading figures are Jews. Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power comes from the Jewish leaders… In the Soviet institutions the predominance of Jews is even more astounding. And the prominent if not the principal part in the system of terrorism applied by the extraordinary Commissions for combating Counter Revolution has been take by Jews, and in some notable cases by Jewesses. The same evil prominence was obtained by Jews in the brief period of terror during which Bela Kun ruled in Hungary. The same phenomenon has been presented in Germany (especially Bavaria), so far as this madness has been allowed to prey upon the temporary prostration of the German people. Although in all these countries there are many nonJews every whit as bad as the worst of the Jewish revolutionaries, the part played by the latter in proportion to their numbers in the population is astonishing. (’Zionism versus Bolshevism: A Struggle for the Soul of the Jewish People.’ ILLUSTRATED SUNDAY HERALD, London, February 8, 1920.)

BAKUNIN, MIKHAIL. 19th century Russian revolutionary.

‘Marx is a Jew and is surrounded by a crowd of little, more or less intelligent, scheming, agile, speculating Jews, just as Jews are everywhere, commercial and banking agents, writers, politicians, correspondents for newspapers of all shades; in short, literary brokers, just as they are financial brokers, with one foot in the bank and the other in the socialist movement, and their arses sitting upon the German press. They have grabbed hold of all newspapers, and you can imagine what a nauseating literature is the outcome of it.

Now this entire Jewish world, which constitutes an exploiting sect, a people of leeches, a voracious parasite, Marx feels an instinctive inclination and a great respect for the Rothschilds. This may seem strange. What could there be in common between communism and high finance? Ho ho! The communism of Marx seeks a strong state centralization, and where this exists there must inevitably exist a state central bank, and where this exists, there the parasitic Jewish nation, which speculates upon the labor of the people, will always find the means for its existence…

In reality, this would be for the proletariat a barrack regime, under which the workingmen and the working closely and intimately connected with one another, regardless not only of frontiers but of political differences as well this Jewish world is today largely at the disposal of Marx or Rothschild. I am sure that, on the one hand, the Rothschilds appreciate the merits of Marx, and that on the other hand, women, converted into a uniform mass, would rise, fall asleep, work and live at the beat of the drum; the privilege of ruling would be in the hands of the skilled and the learned, with a wide scope left for profitable crooked deals carried on by the Jews, who would be attracted by the enormous extension of the international speculations of the national banks…’

This startling piece of prediction is particularly impressive to those who have observed the Soviet scene and notice its strange relationship with capitalist financiers overwhelmingly Jewish since the revolution. The line runs from Olof Aschberg, self-described ‘Bolshevik banker’ who ferried to Trotsky the huge sums raised for the revolution by financiers in Europe and America, to Armand Hammer in the 1970s, who has specialized in multimillion-dollar trade concessions with the now supposedly ‘anti-Semitic’ commissars.

WILHELM II. German Kaiser.

‘A Jew cannot be a true patriot. He is something different, like a bad insect. He must be kept apart, out of a place where he can do mischief even by pogroms, if necessary.

The Jews are responsible for Bolshevism in Russia, and Germany too. I was far too indulgent with them during my reign, and I bitterly regret the favors I showed the prominent Jewish bankers.’ (CHICAGO TRIBUNE, July 2, 1922)

CARDINAL MINDSZENTY, of Hungary quoted in B’nai B’rith Messenger, January 28, 1949

‘The troublemakers in Hungary are the Jews… they demoralize our country and they are the leaders of the revolutionary gang that is torturing Hungary.’

ADRIEN ARCAND, Canadian political leader New York speech, October 30, 1937:

‘When it came to Mexico, the promoters of Communism were the Jews Calles, Hubermann and Aaron Saenz; in Spain we saw Azaa and Rosenberg; in Hungary we saw Bela Kun, Szamuelly, Agoston and dozen other Jews; in Bavaria, we saw Kurt Eisner and a host of other Jews; in Belgium Marxian Socialism brought to power Vadervelde alias Epstein, and Paul Hymans, two Jews; in France, Marxian Socialism brought forth the Jews Leon Blum (who showed so well his Jewish instincts in his filthy book Du Mariarge), Mandel, Zyromsky, Danain and a whole tribe of them; in Italy we had seen the Jews Nathan and Claudio Treves. Everywhere, Marxism brings Jews on the top And this is no hazard.’

HILAIRE BELLOC, renown historian in G. K.’s WEEKLY, February 4, 1937:

‘The propaganda of Communism throughout the world, in organization and direction is in the hands of Jewish agents. As for anyone who does not know that the Bolshevist movement in Russia is Jewish, I can only say that he must be a man who is taken in by the suppression of our deplorable press.’

A. HOMER, writes in Judaism and Bolshevism, page 7:

‘History shows that the Jew has always been, by nature, a revolutionary and that, since the dispersion of his race in the second century, he has either initiated or assisted revolutionary movements in religion, politics and finance, which weakened the power of the States wherein he dwelt. On the other hand, a few far-seeing members of that race have always been at hand to reap financial and political advantage coincident with such upheavals.’

CAPTAIN MONTGOMERY SCHYLER, American Expeditionary Forces, Siberia, in a military intelligence report dated March 1, 1919, to Lt. Col. Barrows in Vladivostok:

‘It is probably unwise to say this loudly in the United States but the Bolshevik movement is and has been since its beginning guided and controlled by Russian Jews of the greasiest type, who have been in the United States and there absorbed every one of the worst phases of our civilization without having the least understanding of what we really mean by liberty.’

MRS. CLARE SHERIDAN, Traveler, Lecturer in NEW YORK WORLD, December 15, 1923:

‘The Communists are Jews, and Russia is being entirely administered by them. They are in every government office, bureau and newspaper. They are driving out the Russians and are responsible for the anti-Semitic feeling which is increasing.’

MAJOR ROBERT H. WILLIAMS, in Fecp and the Minority Machine, page 10:

‘B’nai B’rith, the secret Jewish fraternity, was organized in 1843, awakening world Jewish aspirations, or Zionism, and its name, meaning ‘Sons of the Covenant,’ suggests that the 12 men who organized the fraternity aimed at bringing about the fulfillment of ‘the Covenant,’ or the supposed Messianic promise of rulership over all peoples. To rule all peoples, it is first necessary to bring them together in a world federation or world government which is the avowed aim of both Communists and Zionists.’

VLADIMIR, LENIN, Founder of Bolshevik Communist (From an article in Northern Pravda, October-December 1913, qouted in Lenin on the Jewish Question, page 10):

‘There the great universally progressive features of Jewish culture have made themselves clearly felt: its internationalism, its responsiveness of the advanced movements of our times (the percentage of Jews in democratic and proletarian movements is everywhere higher than the percentage of Jews in the general population.)

…Those Jewish Marxists who join up in the international Marxist organizations with the Russian, Lithuanian, Ukrainian and other workers, adding their might (both in Russian and in Jewish) to the creation of an international culture of the working class movement, are continuing the best traditions of Jewry.’

JOSEPH STALIN in a reply given on January 12, 1931 to an enquiry made by the Jewish Telegraphic Agency of America (Stars and Sand, page 316):

‘Anti-Semitism is dangerous for the toilers, for it is a false track which diverts them from the proper road and leads them into the jungle. Hence, Communists, as consistent internationalists, cannot but be irreconcilable and bitter enemies of anti-Semitism. In the U.S.S.R., anti-Semitism is strictly prosecuted as a phenomenon hostile to the Soviet system. According to the laws of the U.S.S.R. active anti-Semites are punished with death.’

HENRY FORD in (The Dearborn Independent, 12-19 February 1921:

‘Jews have always controlled the business… The motion picture influence of the United States and Canada… is exclusively under the control, moral and financial, of the Jewish manipulators of the public mind.’

M. OUDENDYK, the Netherlands’ Minister to Petrograd on September 6, 1918, to the British Government, published in the unexpurgated edition of A Collection of Reports on Bolshevism in Russia, April, 1919:

‘…I consider that the immediate suppression of Bolshevism is the greatest issue before the World, not even excluding the war which is still raging, and unless, as above stated, Bolshevism is nipped in the bud immediately, it is bound to spread in one form or another over Europe and the whole World, as it is organized and worked by Jews who have no nationality, and whose one object is to destroy for their own ends the existing order of things.’

A. N. FIELD, in Today’s Greatest Problem:

‘Once the Jewishness of Bolshevism is understood, its otherwise puzzling features become understandable. Hatred of Christianity, for instance, is not a Russian characteristic; it is a Jewish one.’

FATHER DENIS FAHEY; in his book The Rulers of Russia, page 25:

‘The real forces behind Bolshevism is Russia are Jewish forces, and Bolshevism is really an instrument in the hands of the Jews for the establishment of their future Messianic kingdom.’

A. N. FIELD, The Truth About the Slump, page 208:

‘The World today, however provides a spectacle of a great concentration of Jewish power. In New York there is a concentration of Jewish financial power dominating the entire world in its material affairs, and side by side with it is the greates physical concentration of the Jews ever recorded. On the other side of the globe, there has taken place in Russia the greatest concentration of the Jewish revolutionary activity in all history…

The enormously significant thing in the world today is that both this power of the purse (Theodor Herzl’s ‘terrible (Jewish) power of the purse’) and revolutionary activity are working in the direction of destroying the entire existing order of things, and not only are they working in a common direction, but there is a mass of evidence that they are working in unison.’

H. H. BEAMISH, N.Y. speech, 1937:

‘Communism is Judaism. The Jewish Revolution in Russia was in 1918.’

HILARY COTTER, author of Cardinal Minszenty, The Truth About His Real ‘Crime’ page 6:

‘Communism and Judaism are one and the same.’

ADRIEN ARCAND, Canadian political leader in New York Speech, October 30, 1937:

‘There is nothing else in Communism a Jewish conspiracy to grab the whole world in their clutches; and no intelligent man in the world can find anything else, except the Jews, who rightly call it for themselves a ‘paradise on earth.’

Jews are eager to bring Communism, because they know what it is and what it means.

It is because Communism has not been fought for what it really is a Jewish scheme invented by Jews that it has progressed against all opposition to it. We have fought the smoke-screen presented by Jewish dialecticians and publicists, refusing to fight the inventor, profiteer and string-puller. Because Christians and Gentiles have come to fear the Jews, fear the truth, and they are paralyzed by the paradoxical slogans shouted by the Jews.’

REV. KENNETH GOFF, in STILL ‘TIS OUR ANCIENT FOE, page 99:

‘The Frankenstein of Communism is the product of the Jewish mind, and was turned loose upon the world by the son of a Rabbi, Karl Marx, in the hopes of destroying Christian civilization as well as others. The testimony given before the Senate of the United States which is take from the many pages of the Overman Report, reveals beyond a shadow of a doubt that Jewish bankers financed the Russian Revolution.’

POPES, ROMAN CATHOLIC.

SYLVESTER I. Condemned Jewish anti-Christian activity.

GREGORY I (’The Great’). Protested wholesale circumcision of Christian slaves by Jewish traders, who monopolized the slave trade in Europe and the Middle East and were widely suspected of supplying white girls to Oriental and African buyers.

GREGORY VIII. Forbade Jews to have power over Christians, in a letter to Alfonso VI of Castile.

GREGORY IX. Condemned the TALMUD as containing ‘every kind of vileness and blasphemy against Christian doctrine.’

BENEDICT XIII. His Bull on the Jewish issue (1450) declared:

‘The heresies, vanities and errors of the TALMUD prevent their knowing the truth.’

JULIUS III. Contra Hebreos retinentes libros (1554) ordered the TALMUD burned ‘everywhere’ and established a strict censorship over Jewish genocidal writings an order that has never been rescinded and which presumably is still binding upon Catholics.

PAUL IV. Cum nimis absurdim (1555) promulgated immediately after his coronation, was a powerful condemnation of Jewish usury. It embodies a model legal code to curb Jewish power that was recommended to all communities.

PIUS IV. Condemned Jewish genocidal writings.

PIUS V. Hebraeorum gens (1569) expelled all Jews from the Papal States.

GREGORY XIII. Declared that Jews,

‘continue to plot horrible crimes’ against Christians ‘with daily increasing audacity.’

CLEMENT VIII. Condemned Jewish genocidal writings.

ALEXANDER VIII. Condemned Jewish genocidal writings.

BENEDICT XIV. Quo Primum (1751) denounced Jewish control of commerce and ‘systematical despoliation’ of the Christian through usury.

PIUS VII. Known generally as an ‘anti-Semite’ by Jewish writers.

BENEDICT XV. Warned, in 1920, against,

‘the advent of a Universal Republic which is longed for by all the worst elements of disorder.’

This is resented by some Jews because of their active sponsorship and direction of such projects as the League of Nations and United Nations. And in effect, all Popes who have issued editions of the Index Expurgatorius, in which Jewish genocidal and anti-Christian writings are condemned, according to the instructions of the Council of Trent.

GRANT, USYSSES S. 19th century American general, politician.

While in command of the 13th Army Corps, headquartered at Oxford, Mississippi, he became so infuriated at Jewish camp-followers attempting to penetrate the conquered territory that he finally attempted to expel the Jews:

‘I have long since believed that in spite of all the vigilance that can be infused into post commanders, the special regulations of the Treasury Department have been violated, and that mostly by Jews and other unprincipled traders. So well satisfied have I been of this that I instructed the commanding officers at Columbus to refuse all permits to Jews to come South, and I have frequently had them expelled from the department, but they come in with their carpet-sacks in spite of all that can be done to prevent it. The Jews seem to be a privileged class that can travel anywhere. They will land at any woodyard on the river and make their way through the country. If not permitted to buy cotton themselves, they will act as agents for someone else, who will be at a military post with a Treasury permit to receive cotton and pay for it in Treasury notes which the Jew will buy up at an agreed rate, paying gold.’ (Letters to C. P. Wolcott, assistant secretary of war, Washington, December 17, 1862)

1. The Jews, as a class, violating every regulation of trade established by the Treasury Department, and also Department orders, are hereby expelled from the Department.
2. Within twenty-four hours from the receipt of this order by Post Commanders, they will see that all of this class of people are furnished with passes and required to leave, and anyone returning after such notification, will be arrested and held in confinement until an opportunity occurs of sending them out as prisoners, unless furnished with permits from these headquarters.
3. No permits will be given these people to visit headquarters for the purpose of making personal application for trade permits.

By order of Major Gen. Grant Jno. A. Rawlings, Assistant Adjutant General (General Order Number 11, December 17, 1862)

The expulsion order was immediately countermanded by the general-in-chief, H. W. Halleck, in Washington. Apparently the expelled Jews had immediately contacted their kinsmen there and had pressure brought to bear.

SHERMAN, WILLIAM T. 19th century American soldier.

In a letter from Union-occupied Memphis, July 30, 1862, he wrote:

‘I found so many Jews and speculators here trading in cotton, and secessionists had become so open in refusing anything but gold, that I have felt myself bound to stop it. The gold can have but one use the purchase of arms and ammunition… Of course, I have respected all permits by yourself or the Secretary of the Treasury, but in these new cases (swarms of Jews), I have stopped it.’ (The Sherman Letters)

ROSS, L. F. 19th century American military man.

As did Generals ULYSSES S. GRANT and WILLIAM T. SHERMAN, Ross confronted Jewish ‘carpetbagging’ cotton traders preying upon captured Confederate areas during the Civil War. In a letter to General John A. McClernand, he wrote:

‘The cotton speculators are quite clamorous for aid in the getting their cotton away from Middleburg, Hickory Valley, etc., and offer to pay liberally for the service. I think I can bring it away with safety, and make it pay to the Government. As some of the Jew owners have as good as stolen the cotton from the planters, I have no conscientious scruples in making them pay liberally to take it away.’

OLMSTED, GREDERICK LAW. 19th century American architect, historian.

‘A swarm of Jews has, within the last ten years, settled in every Southern town, many of them men of no character, opening cheap clothing and trinket shops, ruining or driving out of business many of the old retailers, and engaging in an unlawful trade with the simple Negroes, which is found very profitable. (The Cotton Kingdom. For other views on Jewish involvement in exploiting the South, see ULYSSES S. GRANT and MARK TWAIN.)

TWAIN, MARK (S. L. Clemens). 19th century American writer.

‘In the U.S. cotton states, after the war… the Jew came down in force, set up shop on the plantation, supplied all the Negroes’ wants on credit, and at the end of the season was the proprietor of the Negro’s share of the present crop and part of the next one. Before long, the whites detested the Jew.
The Jew is being legislated out of Russia. The reason is not concealed. The movement was instituted because the Christian peasant stood no chance against his commercial abilities. The Jew was always ready to lend on a crop. When settlement day came, he owned the crop; the next year he owned the farm like Joseph.

In the England of John’s time everybody got into debt to the Jew. He gathered all lucrative enterprises into his hands. He was the King of Commerce. He had to be banished from the realm. For like reasons, Spain had to banish him 400 years ago, and Austria a couple of centuries later.

In all ages Christian Europe has been obliged to curtail his activities. If he entered upon a trade, the Christian had to retire from it. If he set up as a doctor, he took the business. If he exploited agriculture, the other farmers had to get at something else. The law had to step in to save the Christian from the poor-house. Still, almost bereft of employments, he found ways to make money. Even to get rich. This history has a most sordid and practical commercial look. Religious prejudices may account for one part of it, bit not for the other nine.

Protestants have persecuted Catholics but they did not take their livelihoods away from them. Catholics have persecuted Protestants but they never closed agriculture and the handicrafts against them. I feel convinced that the Crucifixion has not much to do with the world’s attitude toward the Jew; that the reasons for it are much older than that event …

I am convinced that the persecution of the Jew is not in any large degree due to religious prejudice. No, the Jew is a money-getter. He made it the end and aim of his life. He was at it in Rome. He has been at it ever since. His success has made the whole human race his enemy.

You will say that the Jew is everywhere numerically feeble. When I read in the Cyclopedia Britannica that the Jewish population in the United States was 250,000 I wrote the editor and explained to him that I was personally acquainted with more Jews than that, and that his figures were without doubt a misprint for 25,000,000. People told me that they had reasons to suspect that for business reasons, many Jews did not report themselves as Jews. It looks plausible. I am strongly of the opinion that we have an immense Jewish population in America. I am assured by men competent to speak that the Jews are exceedingly active in politics.’ (’Concerning the Jews,’ Harper’s Monthly Magazine, September 1899)

Twain’s opinion on the Jews is probably the best-kept secret in American literary history. Immediately after his death, his eccentric daughter Clara married or was married by the Jewish piano player, Ossip Galbrilowitsch. Twain’s publishers were given speedy instructions to delete ‘Concerning the Jews’ from the collected works, where it had appeared in the book The Man that Corrupted Hadleybury & Other Stories. (1) Since Jews provided most of the agitators and orators who pushed forward the Abolition campaign that culminated in the Civil War (which Jewish bankers largely financed, on both sides), it seems a legitimate question whether there was any pre-planning for the wholesale and retail economic looting done by mainly Jewish carpetbaggers after the war. (2) We have cited a host of other writers on the terrible economic depredation that Jewry visited on the people of Tzarist Russia.

ERNEST RENAN, French historian:

‘The Jews are not merely a different religious community, but and this is the most important factor ethnically an altogether different race. The European felt instinctively that the Jew is a stranger, who immigrated from Asia. The so-called prejudice is natural sentiment. Civilization will overcome antipathy against the Israelite who merely professes another religion, but never against the racially different Jew…

In Eastern Europe the Jew is the cancer slowly eating into the flesh of other nations. Exploitation of the people is his only aim. Selfishness and a lack of personal courage are his chief characteristics; self-sacrifice and patriotism are altogether foreign to him.’

GOLDWIN SMITH, Professor of Modern History at Oxford, wrote in Nineteenth Century, October 1881:

‘The Jew alone regard his race as superior to humanity, and looks forward not to its ultimate union with other races, but to its triumph over them all and to its final ascendancy under the leadership of a tribal Messiah.’

MENCKEN, H. L. 20th century American writer.

‘The Jews could be put down very plausibly as the most unpleasant race ever heard of. As commonly encountered they lack any of the qualities that mark the civilized man: courage, dignity, incorruptibility, ease, confidence. They have vanity without pride, voluptuousness without taste, and learning without wisdom. Their fortitude, such as it is, is wasted upon puerile objects, and their charity is mainly a form of display.’ (Treatise on the Gods)

The fact that what are commonly spoken of as rights are often really privileges is demonstrated in the case of the Jews. They resent bitterly their exclusion from certain hotels, resorts and other places of gathering, and make determined efforts to horn in. But the moment any considerable number of them horns in, the attractions of the place diminish, and the more pushful Jews turn to one where they are still nicht gewuenscht … (’not wanted.’)

‘I am one of the few Goyim who have ever actually tackled the TALMUD. I suppose you now expect me to add that it is a profound and noble work, worthy of hard study by all other GOYIM. Unhappily, my report must differ from this expectation. It seems to me, save for a few bright spots, to be quite indistinguishable from rubbish…’

‘The Jewish theory that the GOYIM envy the superior ability of the Jews is not borne out by the facts. Most GOYIM, in fact, deny that the Jew is superior, and point in evidence to his failure to take the first prizes: he has to be content with the seconds. No Jewish composer has ever come within miles of Bach, Beethoven and Brahms; no Jew has ever challenged the top-flight painters of the world, and no Jewish scientist has equaled Newton, Darwin, Pasteur or Mendel. In the latter bracket such apparent exceptions as Ehrlich, Freud and Einstein are only apparent. Ehrlich, in fact, contributed less to biochemical fact than to biochemical theory, and most of his theory was dubious. Freud was nine-tenths quack, and there is sound reason for believing that even Einstein will not hold up: in the long run his curved space may be classed with the psychosomatic bumps of Gall and Spurzheim. But whether this inferiority of the Jew is real or only a delusion, it must be manifest that it is generally accepted. The GOY does not, in fact, believe that the Jew is better than the non-Jew; the most he will admit is that the Jew is smarter at achieving worldly success. But this he ascribes to sharp practices, not to superior ability.’ (Minority Report: H. L. Mencken’s Notebooks)

SHAW, GEORGE BERNARD. 20th century British dramatist.

‘This is the real enemy, the invader from the East, the Druze, the ruffian, the oriental parasite; in a word: the Jew. (London Morning Post, December 3, 1925)

This craving for bouquets by Jews is a symptom of racial degeneration. The Jews are worse than my own people. Those Jews who still want to be the chosen race (chosen by the late Lord Balfour) can go to Palestine and stew in their own juice. The rest had better stop being Jews and start being human beings. (Literary Digest, October 12, 1932)

WAGNER, RICHARD. 19th century German composer.

‘The Jew has never had an art of his own, hence never a life of art-enabling import… ‘So long as the separate art of music had a real organic life-need in it, down to the epochs of Mozart and Beethoven, there was nowhere to be found a Jew composer: it was utterly impossible for an element quiet foreign to that living organism to take a part in the formative stages of that life. Only when a body’s inner death is manifest, do outside elements win the power of judgment in it yet merely to destroy it.

On one thing am I clear: that is the influence which the Jews have gained upon our mental life, as displayed in the deflection and falsification of our highest culture-tendencies. Whether the downfall of our culture can be arrested by a violent rejection of the destructive alien element, I an unable to decide, since that would require forces with whose existence I am unacquainted. (Judaism in Music)

SOMBART, WERNER. 20th century German economist.

‘Capitalism was born from the money loan. Money lending contains the root idea of capitalism. Turn to the pages of the TALMUD and you will find that the Jews made an art of lending money. They were taught early to look for their chief happiness in the possession of money. They fathomed all the secrets that lay hid in money. They became Lords of Money and Lords of the World…

FITZGERALD, F. SCOTT. 20th century American novelist.

‘Down a tall busy street he read a dozen Jewish names on a line of stores; in the door of each stood a dark little man watching the passers from intent eyes eyes gleaming with suspicion, with pride, with clarity, with cupidity, with comprehension. New York he could not dissociate it from the slow, upward creep of this people the little stores, growing, expanding, consolidating, moving, watched over with hawks’ eyes and a bee’s attention to detail they [were Jews.]

EMERSON, RALPH WALDO. 19th century American philosopher, poet.

‘The sufferance which is the badge of the Jew has made him, in these days, the ruler of the rulers of the earth. (Fate an essay)

BURTON, SIR RICHARD FRANCIS. 19th century British diplomat, writer.

After a sting as consul at Damascus, Syria, where some years before, a Catholic priest was allegedly murdered in a blood ritual by Jews, Burton took an interest in the matter. His investigations satisfied him that such killings actually were performed by certain sects of Jews.

‘The Jew’s hand was ever, like Ishmael’s, against every man but those belonging to the Synagogue. His fierce passions and fiendish cunning, combined with abnormal powers of intellect, with intense vitality, and with a persistency of purpose which the world has rarely seen, and whetted moreover by a keen thirst for blood engendered by defeat and subjection, combined to make him the deadly enemy of all mankind, whilst his unsocial and iniquitous Oral Law [the TALMUD, ed.] contributed to inflame his wild lust of self, and to justify the crimes suggested by spite and superstition.’

DREISER, THEODORE. 20th century American writer.

‘New York to me is a scream a Kyke’s dream of a ghetto. The Lost Tribe has taken the island. (Letter to H. L. Mencken, November 5, 1922) ’

‘Liberalism, in the case of the Jew, means internationalism. If you listen to Jews discuss Jews, you will find they are money-minded, very sharp in practice. The Jews lack the fine integrity which at last is endorsed, and to a certain degree followed, by lawyers of other nationalities. The Jew has been in Germany for a thousand years, and he is still a Jew. He has been in America for all of 200 years, and he has not faded into a pure American by any means and he will not. (Letter to Hutchins Hapgood, The Nation magazine, April 17, 1935)’

WELLS, H. G. 20th century British writer.

‘The Jews looked for a special savior, a messiah, who was to redeem mankind by the agreeable process of restoring the fabulous glories of David and Solomon, and bringing the whole world at last under the firm but benevolent Jewish heel.’ (The Outline of History)

‘Zionism is an expression of Jewish refusal to assimilate. If the Jews have suffered, it is because they have regarded themselves as a chosen people.’ (The Anatomy of Frustration)

‘A careful study of anti-Semitism prejudice and accusations might be of great value to many Jews, who do not adequately realize the irritations they inflict.’ (Letter of November 11, 1933)

Wells was in the habit of referring to KARL MARX as ‘a shallow third-rate Jew,’ and ‘a lousy Jew’ in private correspondence. (Norman MacKenzie, H. G. Wells)

LINDBERGH, CHARLES. 20th century American aviator, writer.

Wednesday, August 23, 1939:

‘We are disturbed about the effect of the Jewish influence in our press, radio and motion pictures. It may become very serious. [Fulton] Lewis told us of one instance where the Jewish advertising firms threatened to remove all their advertising from the Mutual system if a certain feature were permitted to go on the air. The threat was powerful enough to have the feature removed.’

Thursday, May 1, 1941

‘The pressure for war is high and mounting. The people are opposed to it, but the Administration seems to have ‘the bit in its teeth’ and is hell-bent on its way to war. Most of the Jewish interests in the country are behind war, and they control a huge part of our press and radio and most of our motion pictures. There are the ‘intellectuals’ and the ‘Anglophiles,’ and the British agents who are allowed free rein, the international financial interests, and many others.’ (The Wartime Journals)

GENERAL GEORGE VAN HORN MOSELY, in the New York Tribune, March 29, 1939:

‘The war now proposed is for the purpose of establishing Jewish influence throughout the world.’

HERDER, JOHANN GOTTFRIED. 18th century German philosopher.

‘The Jewish people is and remains in Europe an Asiatic people alien to our part of the world, bound to that old law which it received in a distant climate, and which, according to its confession, it cannot do away with…

How many of this alien people can be tolerated without injury to the true citizen?

A ministry in which a Jew is supreme, a household in which a Jew has the key of the wardrobe and the management of the finances, a department or commissariat in which Jews do the principal business, are Pontine marshes which cannot be drained. (Bekehrung der Juden)

For thousands of years, since their emergence on the stage of history, the Jews were a parasitic growth on the stem of other nations, a race of cunning brokers all over the earth. They have caused great evil to many ill-organized states, by retarding the free and natural economic development of their indigenous population. (’Hebraer,’ in Ideen)

BONAPARTE, NAPOLEON. French statesman, general.

‘The Jews provided troops for my campaign in Poland, but they ought to reimburse me: I soon found that they are no good for anything but selling old clothes…’

‘Legislating must be put in effect everywhere that the general well-being is in danger. The government cannot look with indifference on the way a despicable nation takes possession of all the provinces of France. The Jews are the master robbers of the modern age; they are the carrion birds of humanity… ‘They must be treated with political justice, not with civil justice. They are surely not real citizens.’

‘The Jews have practiced usury since the time of Moses, and oppressed the other peoples. Meanwhile, the Christians were only rarely usurers, falling into disgrace when they did so. We ought to ban the Jews from commerce because they abuse it… The evils of the Jews do not stem from individuals but from the fundamental nature of this people.’ (From Napoleon’s Reflections, and from speeches before the Council of State on April 30 and May 7, 1806.)

‘Nothing more contemptible could be done than the reception of the Jews by you. I decided to improve the Jews. But I do not want more of them in my kingdom. Indeed, I have done all to prove my scorn of the most vile nation in the world.’ (Letter to his brother Jerome, King of Westphalia, March 6, 1808)

(1) Every big and small Jew in the peddling trade must renew his license every year.

(2) Checks and other obligations are only redeemable if the Jew can prove that he has obtained the money without cheating. (Ordinance of March 17, 1808. Napoleonic Code.)

DE GAULLE, CHARLES. 20th century French politician.

Addressing the Zionist imbroglio in the Mideast in a news conference of November 27, 1967, he observed:

‘The Jews remain what they have been at all times: an elite people, self-confident and domineering.’

SAND, GEORGE (Amantine Dupin Dudevant). 19th century French novelist.

‘I saw in ‘the wandering Jew’ the personification of the Jewish people, exiled in the Middle Ages. Nevertheless, they are once again extremely rich, owing to their unfailing rude greediness and their indefatigable activity. With their hard-heartedness that they extend toward people of other faiths and races they are at the point of making themselves kings of the world. This people can thank its obstinacy that France will be Judized within fifty years. Already some wise Jews prophesy this frankly.’ (Letter to Victor Lorie, 1857)

COMMUNITY OF STRASBOURG, FRANCE.

In an address to the ASSEMBLEE in 1790, the city’s revolutionary leaders opposed citizenship for Jews, because:

‘Everyone knew the inherent bad character of the Jews and no one doubted they were foreigners… Let the ‘enlighteners’ stop defaming the Gentiles by blaming them for what is wrong with the Jews. Their conduct is their own fault. Perhaps the Jews might eventually give up every aspect of their separation and all the characteristics of their nature. Let us sit and wait until that happens; we might then judge them to be worthy of equality. (Tres Humble Adresse qui Presente la Commune de la Ville Strasbourg)

ROBERTS, STEPHEN H. 20th century Australian historian.

Though hostile on almost every point to National Socialism, his The House that Hitler Built does admit that Jews were a menace in Germany:

‘It is useless to deny that grave Jewish problems existed in Germany. The nation was in the unfortunate geographical position of being the first stage in the perennial push westward of the Polish Jews. Unless forced on, they tended to stop in Berlin and Hamburg, where they obtained an unduly share of good professional positions. In Berlin, for example, when the Nazi came to power, 50.2 percent of the lawyers were Jews. In medicine, 48 per cent of the doctors were Jews, and it was said that they systematically seized the principal hospital posts. The Jews owned the largest and most important Berlin newspapers, and they had made great inroads on the educational system.’

FRANCO, FRANCISCO. 20th century Spanish statesman.

In his victory speech in Madrid, on May 19, 1939, he declared:

‘Let us be under no illusion. The Jewish spirit, which was responsible for the alliance of large-scale capital with Marxism and was the driving force behind so many anti-Spanish revolutionary agreements, will not be got rid of in a day.’

PRIMO DE RIVERA, JOSE. 20th century Spanish political reformer (assassinated by the Communists).

He stressed that the instruments of Jewish domination in the modern world are money and the press, and that communism is an instrument of international Jewish capitalism used to smash and afterwards rule the nations. (El Estado Nacional)

H. H. BEAMISH, in a New York address, October 30 November 1, 1937:

‘In 1848 the word ‘anti-Semitic’ was invented by the Jews to prevent the use of the word ‘Jew.’ The right word for them is ‘Jew’ …

‘I implore all of you to be accurate call them Jews. There is no need to be delicate on this Jewish question. You must face them in this country. The Jew should be satisfied here. I was here forty-seven years ago; your doors were thrown open to the Jews and they were free. Now he has got you absolutely by the throat that is your reward.’

CHRISTEA, PATRIARCH. 20th century Romanian prelate.

‘The Jews have caused an epidemic of corruption and social unrest. They monopolize the press, which, with foreign help, flays all the spiritual treasures of the Romanians. To defend ourselves is a national and patriotic duty not anti-Semitism. Lack of measures to get rid of the plague would indicate that we are lazy cowards who let ourselves be carried alive to our graves. Why should we not get rid of these parasites who suck Romanian and Christian blood? It is logical and holy to react against them.’ (New York Herald Tribune, August 17, 1937)

HOUSTON STEWART CHAMBERLAIN, world famed author of Foundations of the Nineteenth Century, Vol. I, page 337:

‘The revelation of Christ has no significance for the Jew! … I have searched through a whole library of Jewish books in the expectation of finding naturally not belief in the Divinity of Christ, nor the idea of redemption, but the purely human feeling for the greatness of the suffering Savior but in vain. A Jew who feels that, is, in fact, no longer a Jew, but a denier of Judiasm. And while we find, even in Mohammed’s Koran, at least a vague conception of the importance of Christ and profound reverence for His personality, a cultured leading Jew of the nineteenth century (Graetz) calls Christ ‘the new birth with the death mask,’ which inflicted new and painful wounds upon the Jewish people; he cannot see anything else in Him. In view of the Cross he assures us that ‘the Jews do not require this convulsive emotion for their spiritual improvement,’ and adds, ‘particularly not among the middle classes of inhabitants of the cities.’ His comprehension goes further. In a book, republished in 1880, by a Spanish Jew (Mose de Leon) Jesus Christ is called a ‘dead dog’ that lies ‘buried in a dunghill.’ Besides, the Jews have taken care to issue in the latter part of the nineteen century several editions (naturally in Hebrew) of the so-called ‘censured passages’ from the Talmud, those passages usually omitted in which Christ is exposed to our scorn and hatred as a ‘fool,’ ‘sorcerer,’ ‘profane person,’ ‘idolater,’ ‘dog,’ ‘bastard,’ ‘child of lust,’ etc.: so, too, His sublime Mother.’

ADRIEN ARCAND, Canadian political leader of the 1930s:

‘Through their (Jew’s) international news agencies, they mold your minds and have you see the world not as it is, but as they want you to see it. Through their cinema, they are the educators of our youth and with just one film in two hours, can wipe out of a child’s brain what he has learned in six months in the home, the church or the school.’

NESTA WEBSTER, in her book Germany and England:

‘England is no longer controlled by Britons. We are under the invisible Jewish dictatorship a dictatorship that can be felt in every sphere of life.’

HENRY WALLACE, Secretary of Commerce, under President Harry Truman.

Wrote in his dairy that in 1946,

‘Truman was ‘exasperated’ over Jewish pressure that he support Zionist rule over Palestine. Wallace added ‘Pres. Truman expressed himself as being very much ‘put out’ with the Jews. He said that ‘Jesus Christ couldn’t please them when he was here on Earth, so how could anyone expect that I would have any luck?’ Pres. Truman said he had no use for them and didn’t care what happened to them.’

WILLIAM JENNINGS BRYANT, three times the Democratic Party candidate for President said:

‘New York is the city of privilege. Here is the seat of the Invisible Power represented by the allied forces of finance and industry. This Invisible Government is reactionary, sinister, unscrupulous, mercenary, and sordid. It is wanting in national ideals and devoid of conscience… This kind of government must be scourged and destroyed.’

HENRY ADAMS (Descendant of President John Adams), in a letter to John Hay, October 1895:

‘The Jewish question is really the most serious of our problems.’

SPRING-RICE, SIR CECIL. 20th century British politician.

‘One by one, the Jews are capturing the principal newspapers of America. (Letter of November 1914, to Sir Edward Grey, foreign secretary. Letters and Friendships)

CAPOTE, TRUMAN. 20th century American writer.

In an interview, he assailed ‘the Zionist mafia’ monopolizing publishing today, and protested a tendency to suppress things that do not meet with Jewish approval. (Playboy magazine, March 1968)

VOLTAIRE (Francois Marie Arouet) 18th century French philosopher, writer.

‘Why are the Jews hated? It is the inevitable result of their laws; they either have to conquer everybody or be hated by the whole human race…’

‘The Jewish nation dares to display an irreconcilable hatred toward all nations, and revolts against all masters; always superstitious, always greedy for the well-being enjoyed by others, always barbarous cringing in misfortune and insolent in prosperity.’ (Essai sur le Moeurs)

‘You seem to me to be the maddest of the lot. The Kaffirs, the Hottentots, and the Negroes of Guinea are much more reasonable and more honest people than your ancestors, the Jews. You have surpassed all nations in impertinent fables, in bad conduct and in barbarism. You deserve to be punished, for this is your destiny.’ (From a letter to a Jew who had written to him, complaining of his ‘anti-Semitism.’ Examen des Quelques Objections… dans L’Essai sur le Moeurs.)

‘You will only find in the Jews an ignorant and barbarous people, who for a long time have joined the most sordid avarice to the most detestable superstition and to the most invincible hatred of all peoples which tolerate and enrich them.’ (’Juif,’ Dictionnaire Philosophique)

‘I know that there are some Jews in the English colonies. These marranos go wherever there is money to be made… But whether these circumcised who sell old clothes claim that they are of the tribe of Naphtali or Issachar is not of the slightest importance. They are, simply, the biggest scoundrels who have ever dirtied the face of the earth.’ (Letter to Jean-Baptiste Nicolas de Lisle de Sales, December 15, 1773. Correspondence. 86:166)

‘They are, all of them, born with raging fanaticism in their hearts, just as the Bretons and the Germans are born with blond hair. I would not be in the least bit surprised if these people would not some day become deadly to the human race.’ (Lettres de Memmius a Ciceron, 1771)

CANNOT, E. 19th century French reformer.

In La Renovation, journal of the socialist school of CHARLES FOURIER.

‘Jews! To the heights of your Sinai… I humbly lift myself. I stand erect and cry out to you, in behalf of all my humble equals, of all those whom your spoliation has brought to grief, who died in misery through you and whose trembling shades accuse you: Jews! for Cain and Iscariot, leave us, leave us! Ah, cross the Red Sea again, and go down there to the desert, to the promised land which is waiting for you, the only country fit for you; o you wicked, rude and dishonest people, go there!!! (’Israel’)

DOUGLAS REED, Chief War Correspondent for London Times, author of The Controversy of Zion, Ch. 32, ‘The World Revolution Again’, P. 274:

At the time, the facts were available. The British Government’s White Paper of 1919 (Russia, No. 1, a Collection of Reports on Bolshevism) quoted the report sent to Mr. Balfour in London in 1918 by the Netherlands Minister at Saint Petersburg, M. Oudendyke: ‘Bolshevism is organized and worked by Jews, who have no nationality and whose one object is to destroy for their own ends the existing order of things’. The United States Ambassador, Mr. David R. Francis, reported similarly: ‘The Bolshevik leaders here, most of whom are Jews and 90 percent of whom are returned exiles, care little for Russia or any other country but are internationalists and they are trying to start a worldwide social revolution’. M. Oudendyke’s report was deleted from later editions of the British official publication and all such authentic documents of that period are now difficult to obtain. Fortunately for the student, one witness preserved the official record.

This was Mr. Robert Wilton, correspondent of the London Times, who experienced the Bolshevik revolution. The French edition of his book included the official Bolshevik lists of the membership of the ruling revolutionary bodies (they were omitted from the English edition).

These records show that the Central Committee of the Bolshevik party, which wielded the supreme power, contained 3 Russians (including Lenin) [Lenin is now recognized to be Jewish as well. Ed.] and 9 Jews. The next body in importance, the Central Committee of the Executive Commission (or secret police) comprized 42 Jews and 19 Russians, Letts, Georgians and others. The Council of People’s Commissars consisted of 17 Jews and five others. The Moscow Cheka (secret police) was formed of 23 Jews and 13 others. Among the names of 556 high officials of the Bolshevik state officially published in 1918-1919, were 458 Jews and 108 others. Among the central committees of small, supposedly ‘Socialist’ or other non-Communist parties (during that early period the semblance of ‘opposition’ was permitted, to beguile the masses, accustomed under the Czar to opposition parties) were 55 Jews and 6 others. All the names are given in the original documents reproduced by Mr. Wilton. (In parentheses, the composition of the two short-lived Bolshevik governments outside Russia in 1918-1919, namely those of Hungary and Bavaria, was similar).

{ Add a Comment }