Browsing: News

The Biggest Threat to Canadian Jewry is Zionism by Arthur Topham


The Biggest Threat to Canadian Jewry is Zionism

by Arthur Topham
August 25, 2008
The following article is a response to Ezra Levant’s recent attack upon Brother Nathanael Kapner who operates an anti-Zionist website out of the USA called Levant’s article, ‘What is the biggest threat to Canadian Jewry?’ found at was posted Aug. 22, 2008. In it he poses the question, ‘What do you think the biggest threat to Canadian Jewry is in 2008?’ and then goes on to slander and demean the owner of RealJewNews. The following is my reply to Levant.
The biggest threat to Canadian Jewry in 2008 Ezra is the perverted and dangerous Zionist influence emanating from the likes of yourself, Mark Steyn and those of the deluded, mind-controlled ‘Christian’ Zionists who have been brainwashed into believing that Zionism is somehow representative of true Christian values and symbolizes such idealistic illusions as the lie that the state of Israel is a beacon of freedom and democracy in the Middle East.
When you further make statements like the following, ‘Luckily, Canadian Jews have leadership that is bold and decisive in tackling the issues and problems that matter to Canadian Jewry.’ I would hasten to add, and where, pray tell Ezra, is this ‘leadership’ that you boast of? Could you be subtlely referring to your own ego-induced, Zionist-influenced perspective on reality? Have you now finally succumbed to the dillusion that you are one of the upcoming ‘chosen’ leaders of Canada as per the statement of your former mentor Michael Walker of the Fraser Institute who once remarked in the Preface to your first book, Youthquake, (1996) , ‘It is written by one of the brightest student interns ever to work at The Fraser Institute. It is important because of the insights it provides into the mind-set of the next generation of Canadian leaders. For, certainly, Ezra Levant is going to be a Leader.’ [emphasis added. A.T.]
As I wrote in my critique of your ‘Jews for free speech’ article on July 4, 2008, Free Speech for Jews: A Critique of Ezra Levant’s ‘Jews for free speech’ article ‘Well Ezra, if you are going to be a ‘Leader’ here in Canada then you are going to have to hit the books some more and get a much firmer grasp on the issue of Political Zionism and learn how this alien and anti-Christian Talmudic doctrine is affecting the Canadian landscape. It behooves you to understand the primary motives of those who are determined to turn this nation into another Communist gulag.’
You go on to write:
‘And for Leo Adler of the Simon Wiesenthal Center, the biggest threat to Canadian Jewry is an ageing hippie and former rock musician named Milton Kapner. As the name suggests, Kapner is Jewish. And he’s American. According to a story in the Boston Globe, he’s homeless, and lives in his Buick.
Kapner has gone a little nuts, so he calls himself Brother Nathanael. Check out that glove — that’s my favourite touch, along with the 220-volt beard.’ [please see Levant’s site for images. A.T.]
Such puerile, prejudiced comments Ezra are precisely what identifies you as a proponent of political Zionism and as such a bigot and a coward of truth. Considering your own nerd-like profile displayed on your site I would hardly think it either intelligent or advisable to be demeaning another person for the way they look but then that’s the standard Zionist approach (or ought I say reaction?) whenever someone challenges the fundamental Talmudic underpinnings that mark and exemplify the twisted and deceptive and dangerous tenets which comprise the Zionist political ideology. If you can’t shoot the messenger, which is the standard Mossad methodology used by Israel in Palestine and elsewhere, then you do your damnest to vilify and demean them with as much ad hominem abuse as your limited imagination can muster in the vain hope that others will then fall for your ploy and not actually read and think about the information contained in Brother Nathanael’s postings.
I already know, from reading the rudimentary rantings contained in your little Fraser Institute propaganda booklet, how you view the hippie generation so it comes as no surprise that you would be doing your best to smear people such as Brother Nathanael and myself (a die-hard hippie of the first degree), but to think that you can merely get away with it because you’ve created for yourself a small audience of like-minded bigots who’ve fallen for your calculated rhetoric is a grave error. I’ve been exposing the likes of your ilk from before the time you were born and so if you think you are so self-assured and righteous that you can verbally shit on those who’ve laboured in the fields of the Lord for decades in order to bring forth true fruit, unblemished by centuries of Zionist Jew lies and deception, well, my son, your are sorely confused and mistaken.
The inference in your ego-bound remarks regarding Brother Nathanael is that he has ‘gone a little nuts’ because he decided to forego being a ‘Jew’‘ and instead turned his vision and his faith toward Jesus Christ. Now most of your followers are likely as ignorant of the Babylonian Talmud as (possibly) you are but I, being neither a fan of yours nor unaware of what your Jewish ‘bible’ the Talmud teaches with respect to Christianity, don’t fall for all the bullshit that you’re attempting to spread around the internet regarding either the motives or the moral worth of a fellow Christian Brother such as Brother Nathanael Kapler.
I know from studying your Talmudic teachings that there is likely only one thing that Jews hate more than Jesus Christ and Christians in general and that is a fellow Jew conspirator turned apostate. Death by any means possible and preferrably the slowest and most excruciating, is too good for someone who turns away from the inherent hatred and pathology contained in the Talmud to consign their soul to the loving embrace of Jesus Christ. Your attacks here are living proof of this practice, one that has been ongoing within your Talmudic traditions for thousands of years now.
Apart from your vile attempt to discredit Brother Nathanael by questioning the sanity of his conversion to Christianity your additional bileous build-up of the former traitor and henchman Simon Wiesenthal is equally revealing and pathetic. Illustrating once again the bigotted, deceptive nature of your purpose you portray the Simon Wiesenthal Center as some laudable organization yet on the other side of that forked tongue of yours you bad-mouth and piss and moan about Ricardo Warmouse and his attacks upon your good person, not stopping (apparently) to think that this same organization, constructed by Zionist Jews for the sake of enhancing Zionism ambitions in the post-war period by this known Nazi-collaborator, has been hosting and training and supporting Warmouse for years.
If you are so damned concerned about Warmouse being a threat to freedom of speech in Canada then you ought to be presenting the evidence to your readers that shows this phoney bastard Simon Wiesenthal for the fake that he was rather than giving us the same old, same old propaganda that the Zionist media has been flaunting on the Canadian (and world) public for years. Better you mention Jules Deschenes’ comments regarding Wiesenthal in his ‘Commission on War Criminals, 1986’ rather than the smoke and mirror b.s. you’re presently pushing. Give people facts Ezra not Zionist spin and more lies and misinformation.
To call the adle-brained head of the Simon Wiesenthal Center, Leo Adler, a ‘brave leader’ is on par with calling any of the present and former war criminals who led and lead the false Jewish ‘state’ of Israel ‘brave’ leaders. They’re nothing but a bunch of murdering, lying, atheistic psychopaths who deserve to be in jail for their incessant criminal activities over the past sixty years and all the indiscriminate killing and torture and destruction that has plagued the Palestinian people ever since Zionism began its nefarious incursions into Arab territories under the pretentious false flag that they only wanted to create a‘spiritual’ homeland for Jewry and not a nation state of racist bigots and power-crazed warmongers.
You go on in your zio-screed to further accuse Brother Nathanael of being ‘anti-Semitic’ and in doing so attempt to extend and legitimize one of the greatest of Zionist-induced deceptions ever to grace the stage of 20th and 21st Century history. The Semites are Arabs Ezra and you can bet your bottom dollar that you and the vast majority of your pro-Zionist followers, Jew or otherwise, don’t possess a milliliter of Semitic blood in either of your veins. So cut the propaganda crap about ‘anti-Semitism’ because we know who the Semites are and we know why you use this ruse to stymie discussion of important issues; issues that Brother Nathanael presents exceedingly well on his increasingly popular website known as Not bad I should think for a homeless hippie who lives out of Buick, eh?
Like Brother Nathanael I’ve had my own website shut down on short notice due to the machinations of the likes of B’nai Brith Canada and it’s a bloody crime and one that no publisher ought to be subjected to, so I can appreciate the hardship that Brother Nathanael had to endure.
In closing I’ll just add this. In my former critique of your article on ‘Jews for free speech’ I made the comment that I had not seen any proof that you were a supporter of political Zionism. Well, now that I’ve read these recent attacks upon Brother Nathanael that confirmation is clear. For all your future ballyhooing about freedom of speech and the Human Rights Commissions and the evils thereof I shall henceforth view your motives as suspect and your words as duplicious lies designed to further supplement the gross abominations that have already plagued the gentile world with misery, death, wars, destruction and pollution ever since the inception of this satanic cult of Zionism began poisoning the minds of humanity at the turn of the 20th Century.

{ Comments are closed }

Once and For All: Historian Ursula Haverbeck Destroys the 6 Million Jewish Holocaust Lie on German MSM TV

Commentary from :
In one of the most amazing events to occur in occupied Germany since the second world war Historian Ursula Haverbeck made history in a defiant interview in which she openly trashed the very basis of the lie upon which all modern European social democratic states have been built. The elderly historian, brought into question the moral integrity of all Western political parties and academic institutions, exposing the official account of the second world war and the Holocaust for the lie it was on a television station which is the second largest in the world after Britain’s BBC.
Millions of surprised Germans sat on the edges of their sofas and gasped as for the first time in their lives the truth about the second world war was brought into their living rooms as the second largest broadcaster in the world took the risk of being shut down for the illegal offense of transmitting Holocaust denial by the criminal transnational Jewish financial occupation regime in Bonn.

fotoflexdeuer_photoARD (full name: Arbeitsgemeinschaft der öffentlich-rechtlichen Rundfunkanstalten der Bundesrepublik Deutschland Consortium of public broadcasters in Germany, details below at name) is a joint organization of Germany’s regional public-service broadcasters. It was founded in 1950 in West Germany to represent the common interests of the new, decentralized, post-war broadcasting services in particular the introduction of a joint television network.
The ARD is the world’s second largest public broadcaster after the British Broadcasting Corporation, with a budget of €6.3 billion and 23,000 employees.[1] The budget comes primarily from the licence fees every household, every company and even every public institution like city governments are required to pay. For an ordinary household the fee is currently €17.98 per month. Households living on welfare don’t have to pay the fee. The fees are not collected directly by the ARD, but by the Beitragsservice (formerly known as Gebühreneinzugszentrale GEZ), a common organization of the ARD member broadcasters, the second public TV broadcaster ZDF, and Deutschlandradio.
[Editor’s Note: One of the greatest propaganda attempts against Germany was the book Germany Must Perish! written by an American Jew by the name of Theodore N. Kaufmann in 1941 in order to build up hatred toward Adolf Hitler and the German nation.
This book was the subject of a satire written by myself titled ‘Israel Must Perish!’ wherein I exposed the obvious Germanophobia that was being perpetrated against the German people by the Jewish owned media of the day.
Subsequent to the satire’s publication online the Jewish lobby in Canada (B’nai Brith) filed a Sec. 319(2) ‘Hate Propaganda’ complaint against myself and my website which resulted in my arrest and incarceration back in May of 2012. That case is now in the B.C. Supreme Court awaiting trial.]

{ Comments are closed }

Radical Press: Status Update

RP:STATUSUPDATEHDRDear Radical Press reader,
It has been close to a month now since I last posted an article. This is a rather long time given the usual amount of information regularly furnished to the site and it requires further explanation.
Since the end of April I have been caring for an older brother of mine who came down with a serious case of melanoma (skin cancer). Being on his own and handicapped and living in North Vancouver I had little choice but to spend a great deal of time away from my home in Cottonwood, B.C. (approximately 700 km NE of Vancouver).
My dear brother David passed away on July 1st and since that time I’ve been dealing with all the legal matters associated with his death. All of this has taken a heavy toll on my time and energy and prevented me from carrying on with my normal line of work, i.e. exposing the Zionist New World Order agenda and defending myself against the spurious, politically-motivated Sec. 319(2) CCC ‘hate crime’ criminal charges that were brought against me back in May of 2012 thanks to the machinations of B’nai Brith Canada and its agents working for the Jewish lobby.
It was during one of my trips to the coast that I attended the hearing being held in the B.C. Supreme Court in Vancouver in June. That event and the outcome of it will be the subject of my next Legal Update. Suffice it to say here that the judge hearing the case, Justice Butler, declined to allow the Charter challenge to proceed prior to the pending trial set for October 26th, 2015.
What this means is that the case will proceed to trial although it is still uncertain as to whether or not the actual date set will remain fixed. This is due to the fact that now that the Charter application has been refused and the majority of the funds raised in order to pay counsel to represent me at the hearing are exhausted I am faced with having to raise another substantial amount of money in order to retain counsel for the actual trial in the fall. What that amount will be is not determined at this point. My current counsel was acting on my behalf on what in legalese is called a ‘limited retainer’ which means that he was hired only to deal with the Charter application. The trial itself, which could run for ten days, will require additional funding upwards of possibly $40,000.00. The exact amount is still undetermined at this stage but it means that I will have to re-apply for another Rowbotham application in order to assist me in paying the cost of hiring counsel.
The procedure for doing a Rowbotham was initiated back in June when I approached the local Legal Aid office here in Quesnel and, as per their unreasonable policies, was refused based upon the amount of donations that I was receiving at the time. I then wrote to the provincial office in Vancouver requesting that they reconsider their decision and I am currently awaiting word from the head office. When they reply and refuse me a second time (which they inevitably do) then I can proceed with the Rowbotham application. Time of course is running out and it does take time to jump through all the legal hoops involved in applying for funding in this manner for the Attorney General’s office is not about to assist me in hiring counsel when, at the same time, they are hell-bent on convicting me of this spurious, politically-motivated ‘hate’ charge. So the outcome of this next stage of developments is still very tentative and uncertain. If I cannot come up with the funds then I will be left with only one recourse and that will be to represent myself.
My GoGetFunding account is still active for those who may wish to assist in helping me to defray the cost of retaining their constitutional right to freedom of speech here in Canada. It will be a tough row to hoe to raise another $35 to $40 thousand dollars to fight this Zionist-created creature in the courtroom but one way or another the challenge must be met if Canadians wish to retain their most valued and fundamental right.
One final word on the planned Legal Update. I’m still not sure of my schedule over the next month or so as I am awaiting word from the lawyer who is dealing with my brother’s estate. I am currently at home but could be forced to return to North Vancouver any day and then my ability to focus on the update will undoubtedly be delayed.
My apologies to readers for all of this extra hindrance and the lack of posts. Hopefully this will return to normal in the next while.

Arthur Topham
The Radical Press
Canada’s Radical News Network
‘Digging to the root of the issues since 1998’

{ Comments are closed }

When the lie is the law and the truth is a crime by John Kaminski

AMERICA1KAMINSKIWhen the lie is the law and the truth is a crime
By John Kaminski
[email protected]
When I first heard that ex-Gen. Wesley Clark was calling for the indefinite detainment of people who disagreed with the policies of the U.S. government, I immediately called my travel agent. OK, they don’t have travel agents anymore, but he imagines he’s one. If the government was going to arrest everyone who opposed what it was doing, I would definitely need to hightail it out of here.
Then I actually heard the actual statement by Clark, and calmed down a little. He was talking about Muslims shooting off guns in the United States and killing Americans, so at that point I felt a little better about the remark he made. And if he wanted to include undocumented illegal aliens who rape and kill Americans, I would feel better about it still.
Even better yet would the death penalty for all dual citizens of any country, because dual citizenship is treason by definition.
What made me queasy initially about the Clark remark was when I first heard of it, Clark was proposing everybody opposed to U.S. government policies should be put in jail and held indefinitely, and if that is ever going to be imposed on the American people, I’d be out of this country in a day and half because I am definitely opposed to U.S. government policies, and I already know that our megalomaniac president has already written an executive order claiming he can arrest anyone he wants and kill them if he likes without ever offering an explanation.
So America as we have known is definitely a thing of the past. The U.S. is now the 21st century version of the Soviet Union, with Jews running everything, just like in the days of the gulags. America has its own gulags now. They’re called FEMA camps.
Now, America is just a bloodthirsty war machine looking to steal everyone’s valuables, including those of its own citizens.
But the whole gist of what the estimable ex-Gen. Clark was saying was wrong. (Despite his Wasp name, Clark is descended from a long line of rabbis; he also commanded the incineration of the Branch Davidians at Waco.)
Except for visitors from other countries who are here for a short period of time, everybody who is in America permanently should be an American, no matter where they’re from. If someone is an American who is working against American interests, they should be kicked out, not put in jail (Jonathan Pollard excepted; he should never get out; in fact, he should still be executed).
Which leads us to a broader view of the whole question of who it is actually working against American interests.
The people who oppose the policies of the U.S. government should be left alone and listened to for the legitimate criticism they have. The people who create and implement the policies of the U.S. government are the ones who should be put in jail, for the incalculable crimes they have committed against the American people and the peoples of the world.
The U.S. government is a bunch of crazed, Jewish-controlled mass murderers who are even willing to rob and kill their own fellow countrymen for a modest profit. Every cop in America should be fired for not blowing the whistle on these psychopaths. The people running the U.S. government have slowly sabotaged the American republic throughout the 20th century, and currently are pillaging the world — no, not for the benefit of the American people, but to send tribute to their masters in Israel, who plan on the destroying the U.S. once they have destroyed all their immediate neighbors in the Middle East..
The entire Bush administration should be put in jail for letting 9/11 happen, then lying about it, then lying some more to create wars in Iraq and Afghanistan that never needed to happen. What are the penalties for the mass murder of a million people for reasons that today are easily provable as premeditated? Bush and his twisted flunkies should suffer the worst possible penalties. Instead, his sinister baby brother is running for president. As a signer of the notorious PNAC document, Jeb Bush should also be in jail.
If Wesley Clark wanted to put me jail for saying that, he would be proving what I have been saying for a long time. If you try to tell the truth in this upside down world today, they put you in jail; whereas, if you’re willing to lie about current events and assist in the needless deaths of many hundreds of thousands of people, you’re liable to get very, very rich.
Your choices today are to believe the government’s fairy tales or be imprisoned indefinitely. This is the Wesley Clark way, no doubt enthusiastically endorsed by our illegal alien homo president Barack Obama, whose entire administration should also be put in jail for multiple cases of mass murder and funneling millions to his friends for no particular reason (I know, everybody does it).
Even though Americans have been propagandized to believe Muslims are trying to take over the world (which like most other religions, they actually might be trying to do), the truth of the matter is that they have plenty to complain about concerning the criminal campaign of the United States and Israel to destabilize and ravage all Islamic countries throughout the world.
You only have to consider the wreckage of nations that have been attacked by the Jewish war machine to realize Muslim counterattacks, no matter how symbolic they might be, are utterly justified. Would that Americans themselves have the moxie to oppose their corrupt government as bravely as those who are willing to risk everything to protest the criminal carnage that most Americans willingly ignore.
You only have to realize that Muslims were falsely blamed for 9/11, and understand who was really responsible for it.
Think of all the dead innocents in Libya, Yemen, Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan and elsewhere that have been caused by this bogus War on Terror, when the terror itself is generated by U.S. war machine directed by Jew psychopaths, and most Americans pretend it’s not even happening.
And Wesley Clark, who has done his share of unconscionable murdering in both Serbia and Texas, has the nerve to say those who oppose this homicidal rampage that has the whole world intimidated by fear, that they should be jailed indefinitely or worse, well, that’s what America has become, not America at all, only the newest version of the Jewish Soviet Union, in which the new gulags are called FEMA camps, and where the protections of the Constitution, which were once the envy of the world, are now just a long forgotten fantasy.
Hear more about Wesley Clark’s recommendation to put truth tellers in prison and other atrocities of the New World Order on Clayton Douglas’s Free American show at

‘We’re in danger from the very people we are trying to warn,’ because they refuse to believe that Jews control America and are busily working to destroy it.
John Kaminski is a writer who lives on the Gulf Coast of Florida, constantly trying to figure out why we are destroying ourselves, and pinpointing a corrupt belief system as the engine of our demise. Solely dependent on contributions from readers, please support his work by mail: 6871 Willow Creek Circle #103, North Port FL 34287 USA.

{ Comments are closed }

Canada’s Zionist Cheka Border Guards Ban U.S. Author & Veterans Today Editor Dr. Kevin Barrett from Speaking by Kevin Barrett

Canada Bans Charlie Hebdo Conspiracy Theories
Posted by Kevin Barrett
May 31, 2015
Denied entry into Canada due to hot-potato Charlie Hebdo book
by Kevin Barrett, Veterans Today Editor
This Friday, after preaching a sermon to 400 people at the Wayne State University mosque in Detroit, I attempted to enter Canada.
The subject of my sermon was ‘truth vs. hypocrisy.’ I urged Muslims to defeat the war on Islam a genocide campaign that has taken the lives of at least four million Muslims since 1990 by exposing the truth about the false flag operations that created and sustain it.
The mother of all false flags was 9/11. And the biggest recent one was Charlie Hebdo a Mossad-DCCI joint operation in Paris last January 7th.
Screen Shot 2015-06-03 at 9.58.30 AM
I played a role in helping expose the Charlie Hebdo false flag in real time, and published We Are NOT Charlie Hebdo: Free Thinkers Question the French 9/11 less than three months later. That book has drawn repeated attacks from the ADL and even the President of France.
Early Friday evening I crossed the Ambassador Bridge into Canada. In my van was a bed, some clothing and personal items, and about 75 copies of We Are NOT Charlie Hebdo. Over the weekend I was supposed to meet for lunch in London, Ontario with folks interested in the book. Then I would give a talk at a gathering in Toronto honoring the Imam Khomeini.
But Canada’s Zionist-dominated Harper regime had other ideas.
The Zionists who run Canada were lying in wait. They were already planning to unleash potentially violent protests against the Toronto event where I was going to speak. The local Zionist mainstream paper, htttp://, published an article clearly designed to incite violence:
Hundreds vow to protest event honouring Ayatollah
The article quoted a Zionist stooge calling for mayhem:
Tarek Fatah, Pakistan-born Canadian political activist, writer and broadcaster, yesterday called out for protesters to ‘do something for your country and your children’s future. We need to stand up against these medieval monsters…Let’s kick some Khomeini ass.’
The article also approvingly notes that Canada’s current Defense Minister and the Jewish Defense League (JDL) one of the world’s most notorious and brutal terrorist groups are on the same page, even though the JDL is a terrorist organization according to the FBI:
But Jason Kenney, Canada’s defence minister and another politician expected to attend the protest, sees it differently. He voiced his concern via social media last week:
‘Disturbing to see anyone in Canada celebrating the murderous depravity of Ayatollah Khomeini’s brutal dictatorship.’
The Jewish Defence League of Canada and B’nai Brith Canada are also protesting the event.
‘B’nai Brith, which represents grassroots Canadian Jewry, believes in a tolerant and pluralistic society that is respectful of all its citizens,’ said CEO Michael Mostyn.

Screen Shot 2015-06-03 at 9.59.12 AM
So Canada’s current Defense Minister equals the terrorist JDL equals B’nai Brith and they’re all ‘tolerant,’ ‘pluralistic’ and ‘respectful’ as they get ready to ‘kick ass.’
Orwellian doublespeak has arrived in Canada…just as ‘let’s crack down on free speech to honor free speech’ arrived in France after Charlie Hebdo, and ‘they hate our freedoms, so let’s abolish freedom’ arrived in America after 9/11.
As Orwell said, if they can get you accepting contradictions without protest, and believing that two plus two make five, they own you.
In any event, it seems the Canadian authorities, meaning the JDL-B’nai Brith-Defense Ministry consortium, had no intention of letting me into Canada to discuss the Charlie Hebdo false flag.
When I pulled up to the border control booth in Windsor, Ontario, I got a normal reception…until the border guard ran my passport. Suddenly the interrogation turned hostile.
‘What do you have in your van?’
I started to answer, ‘Clothes, personal belongings -‘
‘Why don’t you answer the question?!’ the guard angrily barked.
‘I am answering the question.’
‘I am answering the question,’ the guard mocked. ‘Are you living in your van? Are you homeless? Why don’ t you have a job? Where does your money come from? Are you trying to sneak into Canada and live as a homeless person? Who are you going to meet in Canada? Where are you going to stay? Are you going to sleep in your van?’ The guard kept peppering me with non-sequiturs and repeating my answers in a mocking tone. ‘What else do you have in your van?’ ‘Cassette tapes, books, a sleeping bag -‘
‘WHAT KIND OF BOOKS?’ The guard practically screamed.
I explained that most of them were copies of We Are NOT Charlie Hebdo, which I had edited and published a few months earlier.
‘You didn’t ask. And you interrupted me when I was -‘
‘YOU DIDN’T TELL ME ABOUT THE BOOKS! We are going to have to search you, please pull over there.’
They ripped off the glove compartment lid with a crowbar because it was stuck shut, damaging my vehicle. I was taken to a waiting room and detained for nearly an hour as they searched every inch of my van. They didn’t let me bring my laptop, so they had access to it for that hour.
Then I was taken to an interrogation center, where I waited for nearly another hour. Then they took me to a small, private interrogation cubicle and produced what they said was a police record about me that they had obtained from the FBI. They claimed the FBI record showed that I had been arrested in Wisconsin and charged with felony drug dealing in June of 1977. I explained that this was a complete fiction, and that I had not even been in Wisconsin in June of 1977, nor had I ever been arrested or charged for dealing drugs, anywhere, in my whole life.
The ‘FBI record’ was full of false information. I had no way to prove it was false.
The agent told me I was being refused entry to Canada based on that information.
I told the agent that I had been through the same procedure during many recent visits to Canada, that they had checked the same file, run the same FBI paperwork, and there had never been a problem. Why was my ‘FBI file’ suddenly peppered with false information, and why was I suddenly now being denied entry?
He advised me to visit the Michigan State Police and have them provide a correct version of the FBI’s file on me. He gave me directions to the Michigan State Police office in Taylor, half an hour south of Detroit.
When I re-entered the US I was also singled out for a long search and interrogation.
By the time I got to the State Police building in Taylor it was 11 pm and they were closed for the weekend.
I contacted VT Senior Editor Gordon Duff, who spent two years as a Michigan State Trooper before joining a certain alphabet agency. Gordon said: ‘The Canadians are lying.’
Gordon explained that it would likely take weeks to deal with the false information in the alleged FBI file, and that the Michigan State Police would be unable to help; and that it was obvious that the Canadians were denying me entry for political reasons. I would have to report a possible case of identity theft, and the wheels and gears of bureaucracy would turn slowly before I even found out whether there really was an American record about a (nonexistent) drug dealing arrest in 1977 and so on and so forth.
So now I am in the company of folks like George Galloway, who was also barred from speaking in Canada.
What does it mean? Why are they banning me from Canada now, when they let me enter less than two years ago for a trip across the eastern half of the country, and even let me enter to participate in THREE 9/11 truth conferences (most recently in 2012)? Why am I suddenly so dangerous?
The answer, apparently, is that my work exposing the Charlie Hebdo false flag has touched a nerve.
Since I announced plans for the book in February, I have been hit with torrents of abuse, including death threats. And the pushback has greatly escalated since the book’s publication. French President Francois Hollande, responding to the Charlie Hebdo truth movement, called for a ban on ‘conspiracy theories’ at the French, European, and international levels. His think tank produced a police dossier on the world’s five leading ‘conspiracy intellectuals’ and I’m one of them.
Why are they so afraid of ‘Charlie Hebdo truth’ ?
I suspect the answer lies in Copenhagen, Denmark; Garland, Texas; and now Phoenix, Arizona.
The Charlie Hebdo perpetrators a global Zionist organized crime network that owns Mossad and has tentacles in other Western intelligence agencies designed the Charlie Hebdo attacks as the PR launch for a whole series of smaller but similar events … in much the same way they designed 9/11 as the PR launch for the ‘war on terror’ whose follow-up events included the Madrid train bombings, the London 7/7/2005 ‘terror drill,’ and so on.
Screen Shot 2015-06-03 at 10.21.57 AM

The theme of the new Zio-terrorist false flag campaign is simple: ‘Muslims are violent, freedom-hating maniacs who over-react to cartoons.’
The new book We Are NOT Charlie Hebdo! Free Thinkers Question the French 9/11 completely deconstructs this campaign at every level. And its timely appearance is the key to its effectiveness. It would be as if David Ray Griffin and Christopher Bollyn had gotten their 9/11 books published in 2001.
No wonder the Zionists who own Canada don’t like me.
And let’s go ahead and name some names.
The real ruler of Canada is the Bronfman organized crime family. This Jewish-Zionist criminal organization has dominated the Canadian ‘deep state’ since it rose to power manufacturing and smuggling liquor during Prohibition.
It is an open secret in Canada that the Bronfman syndicate owns Stephen Harper. No wonder the Canadian Defense Ministry and the Jewish Defense League have merged.
The Bronfman syndicate also owns or influences most of the Canadian media. Their lackey Jonathan Kay, an obvious Israeli asset who has co-written a book with a Mossad agent lionizing that agency, was a key player at the National Post and the man who was tasked with writing the big-publishing-house book slandering ‘9/11 conspiracy theorists.’
And that’s not all. VT Senior Editor Gordon Duff, during my visit to his house near Toledo in the wake of the Canadian border fiasco, told me that the Bronfmans were key players in 9/11. Gordon says they worked closely with Netanyahu smuggling the miniature nuclear weapons used in the demolitions of the Twin Towers. (The ongoing saga of Israel’s misbehavior with advanced nuclear weapons is a favorite topic of Gordon’s; he also updated me on the slam-dunk proof that Israel has dropped nuclear weapons on Yemen, a monstrous outrage, and a story that is starting to get traction around the world.)
Bottom line: I was turned away from Canada, and denied the right to practice free speech, by the criminal organization that has largely controlled the Canada-US border since prohibition, and totally controls it today.
Kevin Barrett
Dr. Kevin Barrett, a Ph.D. Arabist-Islamologist, is one of America’s best-known critics of the War on Terror.
He is Host of TRUTH JIHAD RADIO; a hard driving weekly LIVE call in radio show.He also has appeared many times on Fox, CNN, PBS and other broadcast outlets, and has inspired feature stories and op-eds in the New York Times, the Christian Science Monitor, the Chicago Tribune, and other leading publications.
Dr. Barrett has taught at colleges and universities in San Francisco, Paris, and Wisconsin, where he ran for Congress in 2008. He currently works as a nonprofit organizer, author, and talk radio host.

{ Comments are closed }

Free Speech for Jews: A Critique of Ezra Levant’s ‘Jews for free speech’ article by Arthur Topham


On May 4, 2008 the Jewish Canadian blogger and former publisher of the Western Standard magazine Ezra Levant ran an article on his website called, ‘Jews for free speech.’ In it he appears to formally distance himself and many other ‘individual’ Jews from the machinations of the unholy trinity of Zionist Israeli mole operatives working behind the scenes of Canadian politics and known respectively as the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada, the Canadian Jewish Congress and the Simon Wiesenthal Centre.
Drawing upon the names of many well-known Jewish writers and media personalities like David Frum and Noam Chomsky, Levant gives his readers the impression that a distinct philosophical, if not spiritual, dichotomy exists between these independent-minded individuals and the likes of the BBC, CJC and the SWC who he disdainfully refers to as ‘the Official Jews, the Professional Jews, the Jews Who Are Jews for a Living’.
On the surface Levant’s criticisms give the impression that, yes, these individual Jewish ‘mavericks’ are definitely not cut from the same cloth as the rest of the ‘self-chosen’ sufferers who continually flog themselves in their traditionally masochistic manner before the Canadian public, moaning and crying afoul about the eternal threat to their ‘physical and psychological security’ as Levant states. But this is not the full story of what is currently happening within either the ‘Official Jew’ camp or the camp of Jewish ‘free speechers’ that Levant would have the general public believe is far removed from the proponents of media censorship and the infamous Sec. 13(1) of the Canadian Human Rights Act.
After doing his utmost to distance himself from these ‘professional’ Jews Levant eventually comes to the crux of his argument contained in the‘ADDENDUM’ section of his anti-‘Official Jew’ screed wherein he attempts to prove to his readers that it is not just that the ‘free speech’ Jews find Sec. 13(1) unsavory but that the ‘anti-Semites’ are now using this draconian, post 9-11 insertion into Canadian jurisprudence as a ‘weapon against us.’
Of course the ‘anti-Semites’ alluded to are not the likes of myself and or , two independent, Canadian alternative media ‘goy’ sites, who the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada have complained to the CHRC are ‘spreading hatred toward Jews and citizens of Israel’. No, that wouldn’t be kosher on the part of Levant or Steyn or his other adherents to give any additional media attention to them because, especially in the case of, the evidence of the root involvement of the Zionist forces at work within the fabric of Canadian society and government is too well documented. For Levant and his supporters it is imperative that the public not get the impression that there may be something much more sinister contained within the ‘Zionist’ factor in terms of the overall censorship equation that Canadians are now dealing with in this latest Zionist public relations campaign designed to heap abuse, racism, disinformation and responsibility upon the Muslim community for the woes of all those who are now victims of said Sec. 13(1) legislation.
It’s my assertion that this is all smoke and mirrors designed to smother and obfuscate, in a further PR initiative, the ugly face of Zionist ideology and keep it hidden away from the Canadian public’s aroused curiosity in this sudden chain of events where we are seeing Jews being highlighted in a scam of massive proportions. The tables have been turned and the shells suddenly flipped over and lo and behold how the exposed culprits in question are squirming and skittering about, frantically trying to conceal their true identities!
Throughout it all though one must never forget that the whole superstructure of Zionism rests upon one fundamental tenet: deception of all non-Jews whoever and wherever they may be. If, as others are suggesting, Ezra Levant is, in fact, a Zionist (I personally haven’t seen any admission of this to date) then whatever comes out of his mouth must be measured against the yardstick of truth about what Political Zionism really represents, not only in terms of Canada but in terms of the rest of the world, for it is the globe, as primary target, that is now, and has been for the last century and more, directly in the sights of the Zionist’s propaganda gun barrel. To deny this or dismiss it as ‘conspiracy theory’ (another Zionist catch-all phrase designed to further deceive earnest seekers after truth in history) is to fall further into the trap that the majority of Canadians have lived all their lives; a trap for the most part so subtle and invisible that average Canadians never realize the magnitude or the identity of the chains that have held them in mental and financial servitude throughout their lives.
Let us be quite clear about some things which Levant isn’t saying. It was the ‘Official’ Jewish lobby groups who have been responsible for sneaking into legislation the infamous Sec. 13(1). It was the former Zionist Jew ‘Canadian’ Minister of Justice, Irwin Cotler who was, and still is, behind this Zionist infiltration of our federal government, aided and abetted by the overwhelming preponderance of Zionist Jew Supreme Court Justices within our federal judiciary who have worked with deceptive diligence in bringing about all this draconian legislation which they, in their typical Talmudic, elitist hubris, never thought might backfire on them at some point in the future.
These are the culprits in this maniacal melodrama who, now that they’ve been caught with their proverbial pants down, are attempting to shine, with full, high-beam intensity, their media floodlights into the eyes of the Canadian public in yet another attempt to blind us, like innocent deer upon a midnight highway, into believing that it’s all the fault of those ‘jihadists’ and ‘terrorists’ from Iraq and Iran and Palestine and Afghanistan and elsewhere that Canadians are now having their basic human right to freedom of speech threatened. Nothing could be further from the truth.
Warmouse, who is but another dupe for these Zionist forces, will eventually get caught in the crossfire and crash and burn along with all the other front men and women like Dean Steacy and Sandy Kozak, et al. It’s an age old, repetitive story for those who’ve taken the time to research the wonders that comprise this ancient Pharisaic, Talmudic scheme to destroy the sovereign nation states of the world and along with it create yet another final and global holocaust, only this time one where the Zionists get the deluded, mind-controlled ‘christians’ to take up arms against the people of Mohammedan faith in a mutual conflagration of fire that will supposedly fulfil Biblical prophecy and, unbeknownst to the christian dupes, usher in a New World Order of Zionist Jew dictatorship and global slavery.
Part of this subterfuge is Warmouse’s suing of Levant, the National Post, its editor Jonathan Kay, and four of Canada’s most fanatical and pro-Israel Gentile bloggers, Kathy Shaidle, Kate McMillan and Connie and Mark Fournier who, as Levant so graciously states, are part of the free speech loving Jew’s ‘righteous Gentile allies’.
When all this complaining of hatred toward Jews and citizens of Israel first came down upon my head back in November of 2007 and I became aware of other blogs also being harassed. One of them was Connie and Mark Fournier’s forum known as ‘’. I registered on the site and as a contributing member and a N.T. Christian, I felt morally duty-bound to try and alert my fellow brothers and sisters to the forces ultimately responsible for the legal dilemma that they were caught in.
It quickly became apparent that was not as ‘Free’ as it touted itself to be. What was most obvious were the Israeli flags flying everywhere and the standard ‘6 million’ victims of the Hun propaganda flashing before one’s eyes. Like all things Zionist it wasn’t what it purported to be. It wasn’t a true Christian site but in actuality a pro-Israeli, pro-Zionist disinformation site designed to further the aims and aspirations of the Zionist Jews who had control of the minds of its members. I soon noted that anyone who expressed anything contrary to the Zionist line of linear, apocalyptic thinking, was usually browbeaten and intimidated into some small corner where they eventually slithered out under the door and disappeared from sight. Immediately upon my mentioning Zionists the attacks began in earnest and I was treated, as all Zionists treat real Christians and non-Jews, like a leper and a deluded ‘wing nut’ and ‘conspiracy theorist’, etc. *
Being earnest, polite, civil and dedicated to serving truth I ‘Gentilely’ persisted in my efforts to debate the issue of Zionism. The result? First denial, then rage and ad hominem epithets and mutterings and complaints from members about usavory sorts such as myself being allowed on the forum and then finally, unceremoniously, I was banned from the site without warning by the good ‘christian’ folks who run it. I now refer to it as the ‘’ forum. Another victory for the Zionist infiltrators of the true Christian faith. Sad but, alas, true.
Levant, of course, for all his rhetoric about the other Jews who are lovers and defenders of ‘free speech’ and throughout all his tirades against the ‘Official’ Jews and the Muslims, somehow always fails to mention that when Ernst Zundel was being high-jacked out of the USA and incarcerated here in Canada and tortured and abused by Canadian authorities and then sent off to rot in a Zionist-Jew controlled German dungeon that we heard diddley squat from these so-called lovers of ‘free speech’. The same when Malcolm Ross was being dragged through the courts and abused and mistreated. The same with Doug Collins and Terry Long and Paul Fromm and Mark Lemire and David Icke and all the other nameless (white, non-Jewish) victims of this Boshevik/Zionist ‘Star Chamber’ charade who have been intimidated and fined and jailed and harassed and abused and bad-mouthed and vilified and libeled by these same Zionist forces who own and control our so-called ‘Canadian’ mainstream media and have used it as a weapon against Christian and non-Jewish dissidents for decades upon decades.
Now, all of a sudden, in the tinkle of a keyboard, we have all these ‘free speech’ loving Jews who are suddenly and pompously and adamantly filled with righteous indignation over the fact that some of them and their deluded lackeys are being subjected to the very same injustice that the rest of us have had to suffer in vain and silence for years and years. This type of behaviour, is, I would humbly suggest, stuff of which bigotry and hypocrisy are made of.
Finally. After all his hullabaloo about the ‘Official’ Jews Levant still has the chutzpah to attempt one last defence of the B’nai Brith, one of the oldest and most provocative and sinister Jews-only masonic organizations ever to grow legs and arms and wield its censorship club about the North American continent. These so-called ‘Children of the Covenant’ are, as Jesus Christ so aptly put it, of the ‘synagogue of Satan’, ‘vipers’ and ‘serpents’ and ‘hypocrites’ who will use whatever method of calumny and vituperative sleaze available to them to libel and harass and imprison and silence those who criticize their racist, apartheid policies being carried out in the ‘ ‘spiritual’ homeland’ of Israel; land stolen via the same nefarious methods from the Arab people of the Middle East.
But, alas, I cannot, at this point and in good conscience, condemn Ezra Levant fully for some of the errors he is making. Whether it is conscious on his part or just plain ignorance of all the facts I truly do not know. He is a young man of 36 years, the same age as my oldest daughter and when I was 36 I too was unaware of the degree of involvement in global politics that the Zionists actually represented. It took me close to sixty years to finally figure it out so in that context there is always hope that a bright young man like Ezra Levant, a protege of The Fraser Institute, will eventually learn the error of his ways. As Michael Walker, Executive Director for said organization once remarked in a Preface to Ezra’s first book, Youthquake, (1996) published when he was just 24 years of age, ‘It is written by one of the brightest student interns ever to work at The Fraser Institute. It is important because of the insights it provides into the mind-set of the next generation of Canadian leaders. For, certainly, Ezra Levant is going to be a Leader.’
Well Ezra, if you are going to be a ‘Leader’ here in Canada then you are going to have to hit the books some more and get a much firmer grasp on the issue of Political Zionism and learn how this alien, anti-Christian Talmudic doctrine is affecting the Canadian landscape. It behooves you to understand the primary motives of those who are determined to turn this nation into another Communist gulag. Not just for the sake of those ‘individual’ Jews who love ‘freedom of speech’ but for the rest of us non-Jew Canadians who also cherish these very same ideals.
* Editor’s Note here: It should be understood that although Connie and Mark Fournier did ban me from their forum they later relented and we were able to cooperate on other matters dealing with the censors off the forum. This article was written prior to then and now six years later Connie and Mark are still battling with those who were, then, attacking Ezra Levant.

{ Comments are closed }

B’nai Brith: Beating the anti-Semitic Drum

The recent attack upon Mr. Michel Chossudovsky, Professor of Economics at the University of Ottawa, by the pro-Zionist media (Ottawa Citizen) and one of its principal internal organs, the B’nai Brith, is worthy of additional historic perspective in order to further delineate the modus operandi of these instruments of political propaganda and social control.
To assist in comprehending the breadth and depth of this universal scheme to silence dissent and permit an unleashed, purposeful program of pro-Israeli propaganda to emerge throughout Canada’s mainstream media, one affecting both the mass mind of the citizenry as well as the nation’s legal and social fabric, it’s imperative that concerned individuals be aware of the nascent beginnings of organizations such as the B’nai Brith and one of its more controversial offshoots known as the Anti-Defamation League (A.D.L.). The latter organization, while rarely appearing in today’s controlled press due to its own self-induced ill-repute, is still a force to be reckoned with and one of paramount influence in the false proselytizing of the absurd notion of ‘anti-Semitism’.
In order to define this illogical phenomenon and expose its nefarious purpose it is necessary that the reader be furnished with some extensively researched commentary from a book written fifty years ago by a once famed (and now defamed) British author by the name of Douglas Reed.
In his virtually unknown, yet massively documented and scholarly seminal work on the history of Political Zionism and its effects upon the past and present global political situation, (The Controversy of Zion, Dolphin Press (Pty) Ltd., 1978)[1] Mr. Douglas Reed, former Chief European war correspondent for the London Times and successful author of numerous popular books written prior to, during and after WW II, gives us some extremely pertinent contextual information concerning both the B’nai Brith and the A.D.L. which places the latest assault upon Mr. Chossudovsky in a more clearly defined light.
Reed was no slouch when it came to covering historical events of his time and his first book, The Reichstag Fire, which appeared in 1934 was proof of his ability to discern the maneuverings of factions working behind the scenes to manipulate public perception, thwart reasonable analysis and control agendas for ulterior purposes.
Having spent seven years in Berlin and adjacent European countries throughout the 1930s observing and discussing political strategy with Prime Ministers and Kings, Reed was able to accumulate information and impressions that most journalists would not otherwise be privy to. As the pieces of the puzzling times began to take shape before his analytical eye Reed eventually concluded that the hidden hand behind paradigm-shattering decisions of the period was none other than that of the Political Zionists and those in high office whom they were able to solicit for support.
In 1938, on the eve of WW II, Reed began to notice, with growing concern, that his submissions to the Times (which by then was under Zionist control) were either being altered or eliminated altogether in favour of stories that were the exact opposite of the real conditions which he was witnessing on the ground in Germany and elsewhere. This frustration eventually resulted in Reed resigning from the paper and publishing his second book called Insanity Fair which was a summation of all that he had gleaned of political events over the past seven years. The book was an instant success throughout Britain, Europe and North America and its prophetic warnings were soon to be revealed as truth as the second great world war unfolded.
In order to facilitate this much-needed perspective one needs to cast an eye back almost a full century to the period of U.S. President Woodrow Wilson’s years in office and the time of the first world war. It was during this era that the original silent coup by Zionist forces usurped the independence of the White House and placed its exclusive powers in the hands of Wilson’s chief Advisor Mr. Colonel House, a pro-Zionist proponent.
In his book Reed describes President Wilson as ‘a captive president’ as the war drew nigh and states that after his election ‘Mr. House took over his correspondence, arranged whom he should see or not receive, told Cabinet officers what they were to say or not to say, and so on.’[2]
Reed, who was born in 1895 just two years prior to Theodor Herzl (Political Zionism’s official founder) setting up the World Zionist Organization in 1897, grew up during the early years of the 20th Century and came of age, politically-speaking, while living in Europe throughout the thirties and forties and witnessing in detail the intimate machinations by the world leaders who were then rearranging the pieces on the world’s political chessboard.
In his exhaustive analysis of how the Zionists slowly, but surely, overtook the U.S. government’s executive levels of command, the better to gain control of policy-making for the exclusive purpose of acquiring the lands of Palestine to create their ‘State’ of Israel, Reed emphasizes the crucial role played by groups such as the B’nai Brith and the Anti-defamation League in blocking all criticism of their efforts through the use of blackmail, intimidation and public vilification of the sort we’re now seeing employed in the Chossudovsky case.
It was after this period of initiation into the inner workings of intrigue by the Zionist forces that he began voicing his comments on the B’nai Brith. He writes:
‘At that period (1913) [of Colonel House and W. Wilson, A.T.] an event occurred which seemed of little importance then but needs recording here because of its later, large consequence. In America was an organization called B’nai Brith (Hebrew for ‘Children of the Covenant’). Founded in 1843 as a fraternal lodge exclusively for Jews, it was called ‘purely an American institution’, but it put out branches in many countries and today claims to ‘represent all Jews throughout the world’, so that it appears to be part of the arrangement described by Dr. Kastein[3] as ‘the Jewish international’. In 1913 B’nai Brith put out a tiny offshoot, the ‘Anti-Defamation League’. It was to grow to great size and power; in it the state-within-states acquired a kind of secret police and it will reappear in this story.’[4]
In Chapter 43, aptly titled ‘The Invasion of America’, Reed describes to a tee the techniques presently applied to Michel Chossudovsky in order to discredit his person, his work and at the same time expunge from the mass mind the true motives of Israeli domestic and foreign policies. Please witness the following comments:
‘While military invasions and counter-invasions multiplied during the six years of the Second War, absorbing all thought and energy of the masses locked in combat, a silent invasion went on which produced more momentous effects than the armed ones. This was the political invasion of the American Republic and its success was shown by the shape of American state policy at the war’s end, which was so directed as to ensure that the only military invasions that yielded enduring ‘territorial gains’ were those of the revolution into Europe and of the Zionists into Arabia . . .’[5]
‘The renewal of large-scale immigration formed the background to the political invasion of the Republic. This was a three-pronged movement which aimed at the capture of the three vital points of a state’s defenses: state policy at the top level, the civil services at the middle level and ‘public opinion’ or the mass-mind at the base. The way in which control over acts of state policy was achieved (through the ‘adviserships’ which became part of American political life after 1913) has already been shown, this part of the process having preceded the others. The methods used to attempt the capture of government services will be discussed later in this chapter. In what immediately follows the capture of the mass-mind in America, through control of published information, will be described; it was indispensable to the other two thrusts.
This form of political invasion is called by Dr. Weizmann[6], who exhaustively studied it in his youth when he was preparing in Russia for his life’s work in the west, ‘the technique of propaganda and the approach to the masses’. The operation so described may now be studied in actual operation:
Far back in this book the reader was invited to note that ‘B’nai Brith’ put out a shoot. B’nai Brith, until then, might be compared with such groups of other religious affiliation as the Young Men’s Christian Association or the Knights of Columbus; its declared objects were the help of the poor, sick and fatherless and good works in general. The little offshoot of 1913, the ‘Anti-Defamation League’, had by 1947 become a secret police of formidable power in America.*
In Doublespeak ‘anti-defamation’ means ‘defamation’ and this body lived by calumny, using such terms as anti-semite, fascist, rabble-rouser, Jew-baiter, Red-baiter, paranoiac, lunatic, madman, reactionary, diehard, bigot and more of the like. The vocabulary is fixed and may be traced back to the attacks on Barruel, Robison and Morse after the French revolution; the true nature of any writer’s or newspaper’s allegiance may be detected by keeping count of the number of times these trade-mark words are used. The achievement of this organization (usually known as the A.D.L.) has been by iteration to make fetishes of them, so that party politicians hasten to deny that they are any of these things. Under this regime reasoned debate became outlawed; there is something of sorcery in this subjugation of two generations of Western men to the mumbo-jumbo of Asiatic conspirators.
When the A.D.L. was born in 1913 it had merely desk-room in the parent B’nai Brith office and a tiny budget. In 1933 Mr. Bernard J. Brown wrote, ‘Through the intervention of the A.D.L. we have succeeded in muzzling the non-Jewish press to the extent that newspapers in America abstain from pointing out that any person unfavourably referred to is a Jew’. In 1948 the Jewish Menorah Journal of New York wrote, ‘Should but one phrase in a reprinted literary classic reflect unjustly upon Jews, the A.D.L. will promptly belabour the innocent publisher until he bowdlerizes the offending passage. Let one innocent movie-producer incorporate a Jewish prototype, however inoffensive, in his picture and the hue and cry raised by the A.D.L. will make him wish he’s never heard of Jews . . .
These quotations show the growth of the A.D.L.’s power in thirty-five years. It has imposed the law of heresy on the public debate in America. No criticism of Zionism or the world-government plan is allowed to pass without virulent attack; . . .
America has today a few surviving writers who fight on for independent debate and comment. They will discuss any public matter, in the light of traditional American policy and interest, save Zionism, which hardly any of them will touch. I have discussed this with four of the leading ones, who all gave the same answer: it could not be done. The employed ones would lose their posts, if they made the attempt. The independent ones would find no publisher for their books because no reviewer would mention these, save with the epithets enumerated above.[7]
The A.D.L., of such small beginnings in 1913, in 1948 had a budget of three million dollars (it is only one of several Jewish organizations pursuing Zionist aims in America at a similar rate of expenditure). The Menorah Journal, discussing ‘Anti-Defamation Hysteria’, said, ‘Fighting anti-semitism has been built up into a big business, with annual budgets running into millions of dollars’. It said the object was ‘to continue beating the anti-semitic drum’ and ‘to scare the pants off prospective contributors’ in order to raise funds. It mentioned some of the methods used (‘outright business blackmail; if you can’t afford to give $10,000 to this cause, you can take your business elsewhere’), and said American Jews were being ‘stampeded into a state of mass-hysteria by their self-styled defenders’.[8]
An interesting point which Reed made back in the 1950s, and which today is probably more relevant considering the 1984ish times we’re living in, involved one of the current icons of anti-dictatorship and anti-totalitarianism, Mr. George Orwell. According to Reed even Orwell succumbed in some measure to the then pervasive pressures being exerted on the general public by these agents of one world government. He states:
‘Mass-hysteria’ is not only produced among Jews and band-wagon politicians by this method; it produces another kind of mass-hysteria among earnest but uninformed people of the ‘Liberal’ kind: the mass-hysteria of self-righteousness, which is a tempting form of self-indulgence. The late Mr. George Orwell was of those who helped spread ‘mass-hysteria’ in this way. He was a good man, because he did not merely incite others to succour the weak and avenge injustice, but went himself to fight when the Civil War broke out in Spain, then discovering that Communism, when he saw it, was worse than the thing which (as he thought) he set out to destroy. He died before he could go to Palestine and experience any similar enlightenment, so that what he wrote about ‘anti-semitism’ was but the echo of ‘anti-defamationist hysteria’. It is so good an example of this that I quote it; here a man of goodwill offered, as his own wisdom, phrases which others poured into his ear.
He explored ‘anti-semitism in Britain’ (1945) and found ’ a perceptibly anti-semitic strain in Chaucer’. Mr. Hilaire Belloc and Mr. G.K.Chesterton were ‘literary Jew-baiters’. He found passages in Shakespeare, Smollett, Thackeray, Shaw, T.S. Eliot, Aldous Huxley and others ‘which if written now would be stigmatized as anti-semitism’ (he was right without knowing it; if written now they would have been stigmatized). Then he suffered what Americans call a pratfall. He said that ‘offhand, the only English writers I can think of who, before the days of Hitler, made a definite effort to stick up for Jews are Dickens and Charles Reade’. Thus he extolled one of the A.D.L.’s ‘Jew-baiters’ as a champion of Jews; in America the film of Oliver Twist was banned because of Fagin! This was the work of the A.D.L.; its representative, a Mr. Arnold Forster, announced:
‘American movie-distributors refused to become involved in the distribution and exhibition of the motion picture after the A.D.L. and others expressed the fear that the film was harmful; the Rank Organization withdrew the picture in the United States’. Later the picture was released after censorship by the A.D.L.; ‘seventy two eliminations’ were made at its command and a prologue was added assuring beholders that they might accept it as ‘a filmization of Dickens without anti-semitic intentions’. (In occupied Berlin the A.D.L. ban was final; the British authorities ordered Dickens withdrawn from German eyes).
I was in America at this time and thus saw the fulfilment of a prediction made in a book of 1943, when I wrote that, as the secret censorship was going, Chaucer, Shakespeare and Dickens would one day be defamed as ‘anti-semites’. I thought to strain probability, to make a point, but it happened in all three cases: a Shakespearean actor-manager visiting New York was ordered not to play The Merchant of Venice, Dickens was banned, and the defamationists put Chaucer on their black-list.
A private organization which can produce such results is obviously powerful; there is nothing comparable in the world. Mr. Vincent Sheehan wrote in 1949, ‘There is scarcely a voice in the United States that dares raise itself for the rights, any rights, of the Arabs; any slight criticism of the Zionist high command is immediately labelled as anti-semitic’. . .
How is the oracle worked? By what means has America (and the entire West) been brought to the state that no public man aspires to office, or editor feels secure at his desk, until he has brought out his prayer-mat and prostrated himself to Zion? How have presidents and prime ministers been led to compete for the approval of this faction like bridesmaids for the bride’s bouquet? Why do leading men suffer themselves to be paraded at hundred-dollar-a-plate banquets for Zion, or to be herded on to Zionist platforms to receive ‘plaques’ for services rendered?
The power of money and the prospect of votes have demonstrably been potent lures, but in my judgment by far the strongest weapon is this power to control published information; to lay stress on what a faction wants and to exclude from it all that the faction dislikes, and so to be able to give any selected person a ‘good’ or a ‘bad’ press. This is in fact control of ‘the mob’. In today’s language it is ‘the technique of propaganda and the approach to the masses’, as Dr. Weizmann said, but it is an ancient, Asiatic art and was described, on a famous occasion, by Saint Matthew and Saint Mark: ‘The chief priests and elders persuaded the multitude . . . The chief priests moved the people . . .’
In forty years the A.D.L. perfected a machine for persuading the multitude. It is a method of thought-control of which the subject-mass is unconscious and its ability to destroy any who cry out is great . . .
The A.D.L. (and the American Jewish Committee) ‘set out to make the American people aware of anti-semitism’. It informed Jews that ‘25 out of every 100 Americans are infected with anti-semitism’, and that another 50 might develop the disease. By 1945 it was carrying out ‘a high-powered educational program, geared to reach every man, woman and child’ in America through the press, radio, advertising, children’s comic books and school books, lectures, films, ‘churches’ and trade unions. This program included ‘219 broadcasts a day’, full-page advertisements in 397 newspapers, poster advertizing in 130 cities, and ‘persuasions’ subtly incorporated in the printed matter on blotters, matchbox covers, and envelopes. The entire national press (‘1900 dailies with a 43,000,000 circulation’) and the provincial, Negro, foreign-language and labour newspapers were kept supplied with, ‘and used’, its material in the form of ‘news, background material, cartoons and comic strips’. In addition, the A.D.L. in 1945 distributed ‘more than 330,000 copies of important books carrying our message to libraries and other institutions’, furnished authors with ‘material and complete ideas’, and circulated nine million pamphlets ‘all tailored to fit the audiences to which they are directed’. It found ‘comic books’ to be a particularly effective way of reaching the minds of young people, soldiers, sailors and airmen, and circulated ‘millions of copies’ of propaganda in this form. Its organization consisted of the national headquarters, public relations committees in 150 cities, eleven regional offices, and ‘2,000 key men in 1,000 cities’.
The name of the body which supplied this mass of suggestive material never reached the public. During the 1940’s the system of ‘syndicated writers’ in New York or Washington enveloped the entire American press. One such writer’s column may appear in a thousand newspapers each day; editors like this system, which saves them the cost of employing their own writers, for its cheapness. Through a few dozen such writers the entire stream of information can be tinctured at its source . . . By all these means a generation has been reared in America (and this applies equally to England [and Canada. A.T.]) which has been deprived of authentic information about, and independent comment on, the nature of Zionism, its original connection with Communism, the infestation of administrations and capture of ‘administrators’, and the relationship of all this to the ultimate world-government project.’ [9]
In 1949 Douglas Reed traveled throughout the United States prior to writing his book, Far and Wide, which was his first-hand impressions of America and a final summation of the influences that Political Zionism was having upon the nation to that point. It was to be his final publication prior to the Zionists imposing a general ban on his works which eventually led to a virtual annulling of his name in published circles around the world.
His conclusions though have, as in the case of Insanity Fair again proven to be the most prophetic of the 20th Century in terms of how the Zionist agenda functions and what its ends are designed to produce. As he states in a chapter called ‘Zionism Paramount’, America suffers from ‘three servitudes’: those being the influences of Russian Communism (a product of Zionism) which had infiltrated the bureaucratic levels of government during Roosevelt’s tenure as president; the debilitating effects of organized crime; and the greatest of all, Political Zionism. He writes:
‘The three forces which weaken the whole structure of American public life in effect serve the strongest among themselves, Political Zionism, which stands behind the seats of the mighty while the others work in lesser places, if to similar ends of power-over-politicians. The proof of this supremacy is to be found by a simple test: the extent to which public discussion is permitted . . . At the topmost level, a virtual ban on public discussion of Political Zionism proves the paramountcy of its sway in American affairs. As in England, the open expression of doubt about this territorial ambition, and support for it, has been almost driven underground in recent years. An imperial thrall has been laid on America in this matter. Traditional Americans, whose forebears detested laws of lese-majesty and the genuflections of courts, now find their leaders performing an even humbler obeisance in this direction; like foremost politicians in England, they thus emulate those Rumanian nobles who long bowed to the Sultan’s rule, vainly hoping to keep rank and possessions. The Soviet ban on ‘anti-Semitism’ (which was in effect a veto on public discussion of the origins of Communism) has in practice been extended to the British island and the American Republic in the matter of Political Zionism. It is lese-majesty [i.e. treason A.T.] in a new form and because of it present-day Americans and Englishmen do not as a rule see the grave future courses and penalties to which support of Political Zionism has committed them.’[10]
It takes little extrapolating to see that all which Reed described in his foregoing comments dovetails smoothly with the apparent convoluted, confusing and tumultuous period that we’re now experiencing in global politics. To elaborate further upon that subject must remain the labour of another article and another time. What is essential here is that readers note the connectedness of events and the fact that the Political Zionists are still very much alive and alert to their diligent and determined effort to destroy the sovereignty of nation-states, serve the interests of Israel and bring in the ill-fated New World Order under the auspices of their original plan, the United Nations.
To those ends organizations such as the B’nai Brith and the A.D.L. have evolved and continue to act as Zionist watchdogs and public censors. It is not surprising therefore that they would eventually attack even those of Jewish decent such as Michel Chossudovsky for Political Zionism’s bold and ambitious plans for global dominance owes allegiance only to its proponents and thus their exclusive and racial policies of imperialism continue to pose a direct threat to both the Christian and Moslem world. Our ultimate freedom therefore depends upon our ability to combat this censorship of free speech which continually keeps the occult nature of Poltitical Zionism hidden from the public eye.
Arthur Topham is the publisher/editor for the Radical Press. He lives in British Columbia, Canada. He can be contacted at [email protected]
* In fact though not in form. The secret police in countries where the institution is native have their entire power and resources of the state behind them; indeed, they are the state. In America Zionism built the nucleus of a secret police nearly as effective in many ways as those prototypes. It could only become equally effective if it gained full control of the state’s resources, including the power of arrest and imprisonment, and in my judgment that was the ultimate goal.
[1] The book can be found in the U.S.A. at
[2] Controversy of Zion, Page 242
[3] Dr. Joseph Kastein according to Reed was a ‘zealous’ Zionist historian who wrote the book, History and Destiny of the Jews, (Eng. trans., London, 1933). He is extensively quoted by Douglas Reed in his book Controversy of Zion.
[4] Controversy of Zion, Page 243
[5] Controversy of Zion, Page 339
[6] Dr. Chaim Weizmann was a tireless proponent of Zionism. Having supplanted Theodor Herzl as the leader of the World Zionist Organization back in 1904 his influence throughout the formative years of the first half of the 20th Century upon the creation of Israel is well documented. He eventually became Israel’s first Prime Minister in 1948.
[7] Reed had first-hand experience of this practise. In 1952 the Canadian Jewish Congress requested that Canadian booksellers refuse to carry his books.
[8] Controversy of Zion, Pages 340 342
[9] Controversy of Zion, Pages 342-345
[10] Far and Wide, Page 274.

{ Comments are closed }

Pianist Valentina Lisitsa: latest victim of Canada’s pro-Zionist Sec. 319(2) Hate Propaganda laws By Arthur Topham

‘We don’t have freedom of speech to protect only those we agree with, or those whose views are inoffensive. We have it precisely to protect people who have unpopular or even outrageous opinions.’
Editorial, Toronto Star, April 7, 2015
‘It’s really hard to come up with words to praise her highly enough because this is someone the world needs to hear.’
Michael Fine, Producer, Valentina Lisitsa’s Rachmaninoff Project at London’s Abbey Road Studio with the London Philharmonic Orchestra
Preliminary remarks
Back on April 27th, 2011, just days prior to Canada’s May 2nd federal election that saw the Stephen Harper Conservative government ascend to power, I penned and published an article titled, Hating Harper. The purpose of the piece was two-fold; first, to highlight my own battle with the then despicable Sec. 13(1) ‘hate crime’ legislation that the Canadian Human Rights Commission and B’nai Brith Canada had been using against me since 2007 and second, to warn the Canadian electorate of the potentially dire consequences for the nation should the Conservative win a majority government.
The essay outlined what I felt were the root reasons why Canadians shouldn’t vote for this particular party. In part it contained the following:
‘Plainly stated Canada is a Zionist Jew-controlled colony of the state of Israel. . . While hidden for over six decades from the majority of Canadians by the Zionist-controlled media’s ‘Iron Curtain’ of deception it is nonetheless an established fact and a reality that must be faced if the nation is to ever recover its former independence and sovereignty.
Anyone who desires to dispute this assertion has to explain and justify to the people of Canada why there is not a single federal political party in the country willing to stand up to the Zionist Jew lobby that now wields such a sinister political influence upon the nation. To attempt a negation of the argument without speaking to this issue can only be construed as evasion and denial.
In the thick of yet another federal election, with Harper and his Conservative party striving with utmost intent to gain a majority government, this pseudo-Semitic elephant in the midst of Canada’s political/judicial/cultural/social living room blithely goes about its business of knocking over, crushing and destroying the country’s constitutional rights along with trammeling upon its domestic and foreign policies, all the while aided and abetted in its traitorous actions by a colluding, fifth column ‘mainstream’ media; itself but another monopoly controlled weapon within the Zionist’s plethoric armory of subterfuge and deception. . .
Screen Shot 2015-04-09 at 11.17.33 AM
. . .The Conservative government of Stephen Harper is a contemptible Trojan Horse. Like previous governments it was dragged into Ottawa under the pretense of being the best option for Canadians to preserve not only their integrity as a free and democratic nation but to set a good example for the rest of the world; one that other nations might look up to and aspire after in the hope that someday they would also reap the benefits that a free society and sovereign democracy can offer to its people. This has not been the case. As we can see from the graphic immediately above there is a specific, self-chosen group of zealots who, through subterfuge and the power of their usurious ‘purse’ plus their Babylonian Talmud-inspired ideology known as Zionism, have a totally different agenda in store for the nation.
Voters, who for the most part have been deceived by the pundits and the Zionist-controlled talking heads within their media, remain unaware of this insidious threat to our sovereignty. Were Canadians fully apprised of the seditious nature of the Zionist Jews within their nation’s walls they would likely vote en masse to rid the country of this omnipresent danger. But they aren’t and so the country once again teeters on the brink of the unknowing. Should the false saviour of Canada, Stephen Harper, achieve his mandate to rule over us with his Zionist rod then maybe that will be the time for a new movement to arise and a new federal party to germinate; one that will address the issues I’ve delineated in this essay plus all the others not covered. The key to our future as a sovereign nation is to understand how the Zionist agenda operates, not only in Canada but throughout the world. Without that key we will continue to remain prisoners of Zion.’
On April 28, 2011, the day after my article appeared on the net Canada’s #1 serial ‘hate crime’ complainant working for the Canadian Jewish lobby organization B’nai Brith Canada (a court order prohibits me from mentioning his name), filed a Sec. 319(2) CCC complaint against myself and my website alleging that I was ‘promoting hatred toward Jews’.
On May 30, 2011, less than a month after the Harper Conservative government won the election, a second Sec. 319(2) CCC ‘hate propaganda’ complaint was filed against me and my website by a representative of B’nai Brith Canada (a court order prohibits me from mentioning his name as well) also accusing me of ‘promoting hatred toward Jews’.
Both of these complaints were received by the BC Hate Crime Team in Surrey, B.C. and an investigation was undertaken by Det. Cst. Terry Wilson. A year later on May 16th, 2012 I was arrested by the BC Hate Crime Team while traveling to work and placed in a jail cell while the RCMP illegally entered my premises using a trumped up ‘search warrant’ and stole all of my computers and electronic files containing well over a hundred thousand private emails.
I have been fighting this second, specious criminal charge that could result in a two year jail sentence ever since. The case is now in BC Supreme Court with a trial date set for October 26th, 2015.
With the one exception of my home town community newspaper the Quesnel Cariboo Observer and its illustrious editor Autumn Macdonald, ever since 2012 my story has been virtually blacked out by Canada’s mainstream media. Nothing, other than the usual smear and slander that appeared back in the msm in November of 2012 when the Indictment was formally handed down by the BC Attorney General’s office, has come out in the press since relating to the mis-use of these so-called ‘Hate Propaganda’ laws.
The Discordant Case of Valentina Lisitsa
The recent case of world renowned pianist Valentina Lisitsa has once again highlighted the hypocrisy, bigotry and outright malfeasance that pervades Canada’s judiciary and the nation’s cultural and social media environment when it comes to using the ‘hate’ card, aka Sections 318 320 of Canada’s Criminal Code, to harass, intimidate and slander anyone whose opinions and political viewpoints don’t fall in line with the expected (and calculated) agenda of the Zionist interlopers who now control the Prime Minister’s office, his cabinet and, thus far, the leaders of all the other federal parties.
In an article published April 7th, 2015 in the Globe & Mail, reporter Robert Everett-Green writes: ‘On March 13, Ms. Lisitsa said, the TSO [Toronto Symphany Orchestra] forwarded to Ms. Dorn an e-mail from Toronto lawyer Michael C. Smith that cited section 319 of the Criminal Code concerning ‘wilful promotion of hatred,’ and said ‘there is a possibility that Ms. Lisitsa could be stopped at the border … and deemed ‘unacceptable’ to Canada.’ An attached note from Mr. Melanson, who is not a lawyer, went further, stating that Ms Lisitsa’s social media posts ‘would likely breach or come close to breaching the Criminal Code of Canada.’ Ms. Lisitsa replied with her lawyer’s opinion rejecting that of Mr. Smith. [All emphasis added.]
So what exactly does Canada’s Criminal Code say about ‘hate’ this oft used and ever abused term that the Zionist lobbyist has managed to inject, via subterfuge, into the country’s legal system and their media tool kit? The Code reads:
Wilful promotion of hatred
319. (2) Every one who, by communicating statements, other than in private conversation, wilfully promotes hatred against any identifiable group is guilty of
(a) an indictable offence and is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years; or
(b) an offence punishable on summary conviction.
Judging from the wording of the text we find that just like the term ‘terrorist’ there’s no actual definition given as to what the word ‘hatred’ means. In other words it is subjective and means whatever a person or lawyer or judge decides it means to them. This fact renders it useless in terms of trying to argue against it or debate it once the word has been inserted into jurisprudence thus making it merely a tool for intimidation and control in the same way that the term ‘anti-Semite’ has been used for the last century to browbeat and demonize anyone who so much as issues a dissenting sigh in hearing distance of a Zionist Jew or one of their sycophantic lackeys.
The same has now become true for the ‘6 million’ holocaust debate wherein an accusation of being a ‘holocaust denier’ has taken on the same legal authority in certain countries and is being used to censor proven historical facts and jail anyone who so much as questions whether the alleged event ever occurred in real time or disputes the purported numbers.
As an editorial in the Toronto Star on April 7 put it the Ukrainian-born pianist shouldn’t have been prevented from performing with the Toronto Symphony Orchestra, adding that, ‘In a particularly weak explanation of why the orchestra was dropping her, TSO president Jeff Melanson said Lisitsa was bounced over ‘ongoing accusations of deeply offensive language by Ukrainian media outlets.’ And, he added: ‘As one of Canada’s most important cultural institutions, our priority must remain on being a stage for the world’s great works of music, and not for opinions that some believe to be deeply offensive.’
This misses the point on at least two counts. First, Lisitsa was not invited to Toronto to discuss her provocative political views. She was scheduled to play the piano. And second, banning a musician for expressing ‘opinions that some believe to be offensive’ shows an utter failure to grasp the concept of free speech.
We don’t have freedom of speech to protect only those we agree with, or those whose views are inoffensive. We have it precisely to protect people who have unpopular or even outrageous opinions.’
Again, in a subsequent article on April 9 in the same publication writer Vinay Menon adds, ‘It’s a good thing Jeff Melanson isn’t running our public library system. Or the city would need to hire 2,000 firefighters to keep up with all the book burnings this summer. . . Am I being unfair to Melanson, chief executive of the Toronto Symphony Orchestra? Perhaps! But this is my opinion and, here in Canada, we are allowed to express opinions, even ones that may seem unfair and offensive.’
Menon further states, ‘The spiritual charter of any cultural institution, important or otherwise, must have certain words etched between the operational lines, including ‘freedom of expression‘ and ‘don’t cave to special interests.‘’
Valentina Quote graphic800
It’s a well established fact that those who accuse others of ‘promoting hatred’ are, themselves, the ones who hate to hear the truth and therefore resort to Canada’s infamous ‘Hate Propaganda’ laws in order to stifle any discussion related to their own questionable actions. Such has been my own experience in dealing with my accusers and, as we can see from Valentina’s encounter with the bureaucrats who run the Toronto Symphony Orchestra she ran into this this same mindset; one that invariably displays both a lack of integrity and the inability to talk openly and honestly about their intentions or their ultimate agenda.
Are we finally seeing a change in attitude on the part of Canada’s mainstream media when it comes to actually challenging Canada’s ill-conceived ‘Hate Propaganda’ laws contained in Section 318 320 of the Criminal Code?
Is Canada’s media, the same organ that trumpeted the call for the repeal of Sec. 13(1) now going to tackle the final citadel of censorship, Section 319 of the Criminal Code? If so then they’ll also have to start considering lending a positive voice to organizations like the Ontario Civil Liberties Association, the one and only civil liberties group in Canada to date that is openly supporting my legal case and the repeal of these Orwellian ‘Hate’ laws that reap nothing but repression, opprobrium and the loss of free expression for all Canadians and others like pianist Valentina Lisitsa.
The time is long past for Canada to resume its former role as a free and democratic nation and nothing will ensure that this happens more than the country ridding itself of all its Zionist-induced ‘Hate’ legislation.

{ Comments are closed }

FREE SPEECH ON TRIAL: Buddhist activist Brian Ruhe interviews Publisher Arthur Topham

Brian Ruhe interview A.T.

Arthur Topham’s Free Speech on Trial – 1 of 7

Arthur Topham’s Free Speech on Trial – 2 of 7

Arthur Topham’s Free Speech on Trial – 3 of 7

Arthur Topham’s Free Speech on Trial – 4 of 7

Arthur Topham’s Free Speech on Trial – 5 of 7

Arthur Topham’s Free Speech on Trial – 6 of 7

Arthur Topham’s Free Speech on Trial – 7 of 7

{ Comments are closed }