Browsing: News

Response to Canadian Human Rights Commission by the Radical Press

[Editor’s Note: The following Response to the allegations by Harvey Smarba and the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada that the Radical Press website is spreading ‘hatred toward Jews and citizens of Israel’ is posted below. It was also contained in the article ‘Killing The 100th Monkey’ which was sent out to the Internet on Thursday, January 3, 2008 and can be found at http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=628 . Readers interested in just the contents of the Response itself can copy it directly from this post and refer to it by the url itself.]
———
From:
Arthur Topham
Pub/Ed
The Radical Press
Canada’s Radical News Network
[email protected]
http://www.radicalpress.com
‘Digging to the root of the issues since 1998″

Thursday
January 3, 2008
To:
Sandy Kozak [email protected]
Anti-Hate Team Investigator
Canadian Human Rights Commission
Investigations Branch
344 Slater Street,
Ottawa, Ontario
K1A 1E1
Toll-free 1-888-214-1090
Fax (613) 947-7279
Website: http://www.chrc-ccdp.ca
Dear Ms. Kozak,
Re: File No: 2007 1016
Please find enclosed my answers to the questions contained in the original September 13, 2007 letter from Michel Pare, A/Deputy Secretary General and my response to the allegations by Harvey Smarba and the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada, also contained in your initial correspondence which I first received via Canada Post on November 20th, 2007.
Prior to presenting my answers to the ten questions from Michel Pare I will first respond with an overall assessment of the complaint from Harvey Smarba, B.C. representative for the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada and explain why I feel it is a vexatious, spurious, and disingenuous charge; one that, for the reasons which I will present, ought to be dismissed outright by the Canadian Human Rights Commission, hereafter referred to as the CHRC.
As well, as a precautionary preface to any commentary on these matters, I would ask that you bear in mind that all of my comments are not to be misconstrued in any manner as emanating from a place of malice or, as the CHRC might define it, ‘hate’. I speak my mind freely, frankly and honestly as a basic human right, one which presumably applies to all Canadian citizens. I do so with the deepest and sincerest intent that what I say will assist both you, as an investigator for the CHRC, and the rest of the Tribunal members, to realize that I and many Canadians view the actions of the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada with grave and rightful suspicion and interpret their actions, such as this ‘hate-crimes’charge, as not being in the best interests of the Canadian people nor conducive to a free and well-functioning democracy. It is therefore my hope that you will come to a similar realization with respect to these allegations once you have given due consideration to the arguments and the information which I intent to present in favour of such a position.
To begin I must say that it would be a gross understatement indeed to suggest that Harvey Smarba and his partner in this complaint, the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada are exploiting and abusing the intent of the Canadian Human Rights Act for their own narrow, partisan, ideological purposes; ones which I feel strongly are not designed to promote and ensure the freedom of expression that the vast majority of Canadians demand and expect but rather are meant to buttress and support the political aims of a foreign state (Israel) of which these organizations are but political extensions.

The reality, as I understand it Ms. Kozak, is that the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada, like its twin, the Canadian Jewish Congress (CJC), and their adjunct arm the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), are not what they ostensibly appear to be in terms of the public’s general understanding and that when the truth is finally revealed and their masks eventually removed, all these entities will be shown to be long-standing, front organizations created to function as propaganda tools for those who ascribe to what is historically known as Political Zionism, an ideology based upon the Judaic Talmud and manifesting in the policies of the government of the state of Israel. For the historical evidence of this please see the article B’nai Brith: Beating the anti-Semitic Drum http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=477 This Zionist ideology, when juxtaposed with all the corroborating evidence which exists, shows itself to be a political/religious program designed to instill and promote a racist-based, segregated, supremacist, discriminatory, apartheid system of governance; one that has been in existence since the inception of the Jewish state of Israel back in 1948 and is currently still being enforced by the present state and operating not only within its own undefined boundaries but also within foreign (Palestinian) territory illegally occupied by Israeli military forces.
While on first notice this may appear to be an extreme assertion, the historical evidence exists (although hidden from the general public for the better part of the last century by a complicit, pro-Zionist-controlled ‘western’ media cartel), to fully corroborate the premise upon which I make these apparently radical and seemingly startling statements.
What I am proposing to you and your Commission members and to the Canadian public (who will also be alerted to this critical issue) is the contention that, based upon my years of research, the actual and true agenda of Harvey Smarba and his partner in this complaint, the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada is, in fact, one of seditious, purposeful design meant to undermine not only the sovereignty of the legally elected Canadian government, but simultaneously, to assist, aid and abet a much larger and more sinister agenda that of attempting to subvert, suppress and nullify the legitimate rights of all Canadian citizens with respect to their most cherished and intrinsic values. Here I refer to a citizen’s inalienable right to freedom of religion, freedom of expression, freedom of thought and freedom of speech, all of which are currently being attacked in earnest by extremist, ideologically driven organizations such as the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada and the Canadian Jewish Congress, both of whom ascribe to, and are in fact undeniably and inextricably based upon the racist, unconstitutional, discriminatory, exclusionary, and supremacist philosophy known as Political Zionism.
As already stated I have investigated this phenomenon in earnest for a number of years, both as a writer and researcher of history and as a publisher of a legitimate, established new service (The Radical Press) which has been operating in Canada since June of 1998. During the course of the last decade and following the dictates of my business motto ‘Digging to the root of the issues’ I have unearthed more than a sufficient amount of authentic evidence which indicates that organizations such as the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith and the Canadian Jewish Congress consistently use their financial position, media monopoly and political lobbying power to negatively influence Canadian jurisprudence in order that cumulative legislation over the years inevitably tends to disproportionately favour one extremely small minority group in Canada (less than 2% of all Canadians) and that minority happens to be Canada’s Jewish population, and in particular the sub-element of Zionists embedded within the greater Jewish community, who believe in and promote the Zionist ideology as subscribed to by the state of Israel. In other words, Ms. Kozak, Canadian jurisprudence, and subsequently Canada’s freedom, has been incrementally high-jacked by what amounts to be a percentage of citizens who comprise less than 1% of Canada’s total population.
As such Harvey Smarba and the League of Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada’s spurious contention that I and my website, http://www.radicalpress.com are contriving to ‘promote ongoing hatred affecting persons identifiable as Jews and/or as citizens of Israel’ is premised not only upon the false accusation that the articles contained on the website, written either by myself or other writers, are designed to somehow denigrate all Jews but also with the premeditated intention of diverting and misdirecting the focus of the public away from the content of the information (the message) onto a side diversion, that of ‘promoting hatred’, (the messenger) so as to prevent the reading population from gaining access to and assimilating the data and possibly using it to form their own conclusions as to whether or not the information fits into the overall picture of what is really happening in Israel and Palestine and, concurrently, here in Canada. Along with these two objectives I would hasten to add what I conceive to be a further and more imminent danger for all for Canadians, that of surreptitiously creating biased, deceiving and unconstitutional legislation which, over time, will stifle and silence, by fear-motivated threat of litigation, fines and imprisonment, any and all debate related to the ideology and practice of Zionism, either by those who promote such policies in Israel (the majority of Jewish citizens) or those front organizations within Canada such as the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith and the Canadian Jewish Congress whose primary modus operandi is to support the objectives of the Jewish state.
Bearing such assertions in mind, for Harvey Smarba and the League of Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada to attempt a perpetuation of this old and worn-out canard of ‘hatred’ toward Jews, regardless of its past efficacy in silencing and suppressing debate on issues related to either the policies of the state of Israel toward the Palestinian people or to the stranglehold over western mainstream media and international finance and so on, flies in the face of insurmountable and indisputable evidence to the contrary that appears daily on the internet and is even now, of necessity, trickling down into the Zionist-run media monopoly that heavily influences both Americans and Canadians alike. As a result we find in some of the most recent examples the cases of former U.S. President Jimmy Carter who is being incessantly attacked and vilified around the world by Zionist ideologues for his book, Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid, which focuses in on the very issues which I am outlining here, which are: the parallel structure and nature of the former apartheid state of South Africa with that of the current state of Israel and its racist, exclusionary treatment of the Palestinian people both within its own undetermined national boundaries and in the surrounding Palestinian territories which it illegally has occupied for decades. The other outstanding instance (more so in the US media) is the controversial case of the two respected Jewish researchers in the USA, John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt and their book, The Israeli Lobby. Again, the attack upon them is relentlessly rude and only the epithets differ because they themselves are both ethnic Jews. Numerous other examples abound.
Synonymous with current criticism of Israel and the Zionist Jews by such notable Gentile internet authors as John Kaminski, Curt Maynard, Wendy Campbell, Texe Marrs, Alex James, Paul Fromm, Michael A. Hoffman II, James Petras, Edgar J. Steele, Mark Glenn and others are the writings and speeches of some of the most fervent and impassioned critics of the Zionist Israeli state who are themselves ethnic Jews. Canadian internet writer Dr. Henry Makow http://www.henrymakow.com/ is a good example of what I am referring to. Due to the fact that these harsh critics of Zionist Israeli policies are bone fide Jews, the fanatical element itself, i.e. the Zionists, cannot with any credibility, accuse them of promoting Å‘hatred’ toward Jews. It therefore creates a conundrum for the Zionist Jews as well as for the Christian Zionist elements within our own western society who have been deceived by this false Messiah (Zionism) and fallen into the trap of believing that the state of Israel, because of its Biblical ramifications, is above and beyond criticism and/or fault. As a result, and true to the fallacious and indefensibly dogmatic tenets upon which the Zionist ideology is constructed, their only method of retaliating against their own kind is to resort to the most sordid practice of heaping as much calumny, slander, libel, verbal abuse and willful, malicious hatred that they can muster onto those ethnic Jews who they deem traitorous to the Zionist Israeli government. Thus, the brave and courageous Jews who have broken away from this pack of perfidious, self-chosen zealots and have displayed the audacity to criticize the Zionist agenda now are forced to bear the brunt of what is likely some of the most scathing, vitriolic, hate-related messaging on the net today. For anyone who doubts the veracity of the above statement they need only go to the following website http://www.masada2000.org/list-A.html and read for themselves the long list created by these fanatical proponents of Zionism. Blatant examples such as this beg the question as to why the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada are not raising a public outcry and pushing to have this site shut down for promoting ‘hatred*’ toward Jews?
These introductory comments basically cover what I wish to say at this point regarding Political Zionism and its direct connection with Harvey Smarba and the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada. Tribunal members and readers in general who are interested in finding out more about this race-based ideology can study the phenomenon in greater detail by reading online the classic reference book on the origins and practices of Political Zionism by the late Douglas Reed, former British foreign correspondent for the London Times who wrote The Controversy of Zion http://www.radicalpress.com/?page_id=34 back in 1956 after spending 25 years researching the subject. For a more detailed account of my own views on this subject I suggest the article, Epistle to Paul, http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=90 . There will also be other urls to articles and books on this topic which I will be posting in the bibliography at the end of this response. Simply googling the term ‘Zionism’ or ‘Political Zionism’ will give enquirers ample information. I would now like to return to the charges that Harvey Smarba and the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada have brought to your Commission and focus attention on the specifics of the alleged misdeeds.
On Page 1 the Complainant, Harvey Smarba, states that he is ‘a Canadian citizen of Jewish faith’ and that it is his (and the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada’s) contention that I and my website RadicalPress.com are contriving ‘to promote ongoing hatred affecting persons identifiable as Jews and/or as citizens of Israel.’ In my discussions with you Ms. Kovak on the issue of this contention I asked for some clarification on the meaning and use of this word ‘‘hatred’ as it is understood and applied by the CHRC. You kindly furnished me with the following reply which I am inserting here. I do so because meanings of words play an extremely important role in determining intent and truth when it comes to such subjective concepts as hatred and contempt toward human beings:
From: SANDY KOZAK
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007
To:
Subject: Re: CHRC complaint
Mr. Topham,
In response to your email of 28 November 2007, the following information should answer the questions you posed about the meaning of ‘hate’ and our investigation of these types of complaints. Further, I would recommend that you submit a full response to the allegations initially, however, further information can be submitted later if necessary.
The investigation will examine whether there is support for the complainant’s allegation of hate on the internet by considering:
i. whether the material which forms the basis of the complaint was observed on the Internet;
ii. whether the communication of the material has at least partially taken place in Canada;
iii. whether the material is likely to expose a person or persons to hatred or contempt based on characteristic(s) based upon a prohibited ground(s)
iv. whether the Respondent communicated or caused to be communicated the material which forms the basis of the complaint.
What constitutes ‘hatred’ is not defined in the Canadian Human Rights Act. It is a question of fact. It is generally accepted to refer to extreme ill-will and is an emotion which allows for ‘no redeeming qualities’ in the person at whom it is directed. ‘Contempt’ is similarly extreme and includes circumstances in which the object of one’s feelings is looked down upon, belittled, despised, dishonored or disgraced.
Sincerely,
Sandy Kozak
Investigator
Canadian Human Rights Commission
Now, apart from the nebulous CHRC guidelines upon which to base the ‘support’ for the complainant’s allegation (contained in i. to iv.), it appears from what is stated, that the term ‘hatred’ is not defined in the Canadian Human Rights Act. Whether this is so because it is not possible to define it in any legal sense is not stated. One is left to assume that instead of defining the word it is to be regarded as a ‘question of fact’; that it is ‘generally accepted’ as referring to ‘extreme ill-will’ by one person toward another and is an ‘emotion’that will not ‘allow for’ the person who feels such feelings to see any ‘redeeming qualities’ in the person at whom this ‘hatred’ is directed. In addition the term ‘contempt’ is also defined as ‘similarly extreme’ and ‘includes circumstances in which the object of one’s feelings is looked down upon, belittled, despised, dishonored or disgraced.’ These, I would say, are extremely relative, subjective terms and liable to a variety of interpretations, as will be shown.
Given this interpretation, and taking it at face value, I would now have you consider the following: Mr. Harvey Smarba has stated in his complaint that he is a Canadian citizen ‘of Jewish ‘. This, by definition, means that he believes in and accepts and acts upon those beliefs and founding principles and dogma which are contained within the tenets of his faith, Judaism, as outlined in the main work upon which Judaism rests, the Babylonian Talmud. If this is so then Harvey Smarba believes in and supports the fundamental ideological principles upon which the Jewish state of Israel is based, for that nation was founded upon the same beliefs as those contained in the Judaic Talmud. This assertion of mine is also based upon the facts of the complaint wherein Smarba and the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada state that they feel I and my website are promoting ongoing hatred affecting persons identifiable as ‘citizens of Israel’. To attempt to defend the foreign citizens of Israel, who, by majority choice, have continuously elected governments that are premised upon a racist, exclusionary, anti-democratic platform, from criticisms originating in another foreign country (Canada), is, I suggest, both disingenuous and frivolous and designed to conceal a much greater and immediate plan on the part of Mr. Smarba and the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada, which is that of censorship of Israeli/Zionist aims and principles via the unscrupulous manipulation of organizations such as the CHRC which, due to their inherent structure, lend themselves to such clandestine practices.
In order to clearly illustrate the quintessential point which I am attempting to convey to the CHRC it is necessary at this place in my response that I insert a somewhat lengthy extract from a source within Israel itself. In his classic work, Jewish History, Jewish Religion: The Weight of Three Thousand Years, published in 1994, the well-known and respected Jewish scholar, life-long human rights activist and citizen of the state of Israel, Israel Shahak, describes the Jewish state of Israel and shows how it defines itself and its citizens. Because of the paramount importance of this particular issue of Jewish citizenship, its dual nature and direct relationship to both the Judaic faith and to the fact that Mr. Harvey Smarba claims himself to be a member of this faith, I feel it needs to be examined by your commission in much greater detail. The extract itself comes from Chapter 1, A Closed Utopia? Sub-titled, Defining the Jewish State. All bold type is mine:
‘Without a discussion of the prevalent Jewish attitudes to non-Jews, even the concept of Israel as ’ Jewish state’, as Israel formally defines itself, cannot be understood. The widespread misconception that Israel, even without considering its regime in the Occupied Territories, is a true democracy arises from the refusal to confront the significance of the term ’ Jewish state’ for non-Jews. In my view, Israel as a Jewish state constitutes a danger not only to itself and its inhabitants, but to all Jews and to all other peoples and states in the Middle East and beyond….’
‘…Let me begin with the official Israeli definition of the term Jewish’ illustrating the crucial difference between Israel as ’ Jewish state’ and the majority of other states. By this official definition, Israel ‘belongs’ to persons who are defined by the Israeli authorities as ‘Jewish’, irrespective of where they live, and to them alone. On the other hand, Israel doesn’t officially’belong’ to its non-Jewish citizens, whose status is considered even officially as inferior. This means in practice that if members of a Peruvian tribe are converted to Judaism, and thus regarded as Jewish, they are entitled at once to become Israeli citizens and benefit from the approximately 70 per cent of the West Bank land (and the 92 per cent of the area of Israel proper), officially designated only for the benefit of Jews. All non-Jews, (not only Palestinians) are prohibited from benefiting from those lands. (The prohibition applies even to Israeli Arabs who served in the Israeli army and reached a high rank.) The case involving Peruvian converts to Judaism actually occurred a few years ago. The newly-created Jews were settled in the West Bank, near Nablus, on land from which non-Jews are officially excluded. All Israeli governments are taking enormous political risks, including the risk of war, so that such settlements, composed exclusively of persons who are defined as ‘Jewish’ (and not ‘Israeli’ as most of the media mendaciously claims) would be subject to only ‘Jewish’ authority.
‘I suspect that the Jews of the USA or of Britain [or Canada A.T.] would regard it as antisemitic if Christians would propose that the USA or the United Kingdom should become a ‘Christian state’, belonging only to citizens officially defined as ‘Christians’. The consequence of such doctrine is that Jews converting to Christianity would become full citizens because of their conversion. It should be recalled that the benefits of conversions are well known to Jews from their own history. When the Christians and the Islamic states used to discriminate against all persons not belonging to the religion of the state, including the Jews, the discrimination against Jews was at once removed by their conversion. But a non-Jew discriminated against by the State of Israel will cease to be so treated the moment he or she converts to Judaism. This simply shows that the same kind of exclusivity that is regarded by the majority of the diaspora Jews as antisemitic is regarded by the majority of all Jews as Jewish. To oppose both antisemitism and Jewish chauvinism is widely regarded among Jews as a ‘self-hatred’, a concept which I regard as nonsensical.
‘The meaning of the term ‘Jewish’ and its cognates, including ‘Judaism’, thus becomes in the context of Israeli politics as important as the meaning of ‘Islamic’ when officially used by Iran or ‘communist’ when it was officially used by the USSR. However, the meaning of the term ‘Jewish’ as it is popularly used is not clear, either in Hebrew or when translated into other languages, and so the term had to defined officially.
‘According to Israeli law a person is considered ‘Jewish’ if either their mother, grandmother, great-grandmother and great-great-grandmother were Jewesses by religion; or if the person was converted to Judaism in a way satisfactory to the Israeli authorities, and on condition that the person has not converted from Judaism to another religion, in which case Israel ceases to regard them as ‘Jewish’. Of the three conditions, the first represents the Talmudic definition of ‘who is a Jew’, a definition followed by Jewish Orthodoxy. The Talmud and post-Talmudic rabbinic law also recognize the conversion of a non-Jew to Judaism (as well as the purchase of a non-Jewish slave by a Jew followed by a different kind of conversion) as a method of becoming Jewish, provided that the conversion is performed by authorized rabbis in a proper manner. This ‘proper manner’ entails, for females, their inspection by three rabbis while naked in a ‘bath of purification’, a ritual which, although notorious to all readers of the Hebrew press, is not often mentioned by the English media in spite of its undoubted interest for certain readers. I hope that this book will be the beginning of a process which will rectify this discrepancy.
‘But there is another urgent necessity for an official definition of who is, and who is not ‘Jewish’. The State of Israel officially discriminates in favour of Jews and against non-Jews in many domains of life, of which I regard three as being most important: residency rights, the right to work and the right to equality before the law. Discrimination in residency is based on the fact that about 92 per cent of Israel’s land is the property of the state and is administered by the Israel Land Authority according to regulations issued by the Jewish National Fund (JNF), an affiliate of the World Zionist Organization. In its regulations the JNF denies the right to reside, to open a business, and often also to work, to anyone who is not Jewish, only because he is not Jewish. At the same time, Jews are not prohibited from taking residence or opening businesses anywhere in Israel. If applied in another state against the Jews, such discriminatory practice would instantly and justifiably be labeled antisemitism and would no doubt spark massive public protests. When applied by Israel as a part of its ‘Jewish ideology’, they are usually studiously ignored or excused when rarely mentioned.
‘The denial of the right to work means that non-Jews [but still citizens A.T.] are prohibited officially from working on land administered by the Israel Land Authority according to the JNF regulations….
‘Non-Jewish citizens of Israel do not have the right to equality before the law….
‘…The routine means for enforcing discrimination in everyday life is the ID card, which everyone is obliged to carry at all times. ID cards list the official ‘nationality’ of a person, which can be ‘Jewish’, ‘Arab’, ‘Druze’ and the like, with the significant exception of ‘Israeli’. Attempts to force the Interior Ministry to allow Israelis wishing to be officially described as ‘Israeli’, or even as ‘Israeli-Jew’ in their ID cards have failed. Those who have attempted to do so have received a letter from the Ministry of the Interior stating that ‘it was decided not to recognize an Israeli nationality’. The letter does not specify who made the decision or when.
‘There are so many laws and regulations in Israel which discriminate in favour of the persons defined as those ‘who can immigrate in accordance with the Law of Return’ [i.e. Jews. A.T.] that the subject demands separate treatment. We can look here at one example, seemingly trivial in comparison with residence restrictions, but nevertheless important since it reveals the real intentions of the Israeli legislator. Israeli citizens who left the country for a time but who are defined as those who ‘can immigrate in accordance with the Law of Return’ are eligible on their return to generous customs benefits, to receive subsidy for their children’s high school education, and to receive either a grant or a loan on easy terms for the purchase of an apartment, as well as other benefits. Citizens who cannot be so defined, in other words, the non-Jewish citizens of Israel, get none of these benefits. The obvious intention of such discriminatory measures is to decrease the number of non-Jewish citizens of Israel, in order to make Israel a more ‘Jewish state.’
Returning now to the Commission’s definition of hatred and contempt, and based upon the testimony of what constitutes a person deemed to be ‘Jewish’, the evidence clearly points to a ‘question of fact’ and that fact is that the official state policy of Israel is racist-based and discriminatory and divides its citizens into two distinct classes, those fitting the designation of ‘Jewish’ and those not. Those who don’t meet the guidelines that define them as ‘Jewish’ are accorded less rights and privileges than those who do meet the rigid criteria. This, I propose, is NOT the basis of a free and democratic society where ALL citizens are accorded equal rights by law as is assumed to be the case here in Canada. It is, in FACT, a description of a totalitarian, apartheid state wherein only those considered by law to be full citizens are given full rights. Those of a lesser degree who are not considered to be of the Jewish faith (the prerequisite for full citizenship) are treated as second-class citizens.
Therefore, according to reason and the laws of logic, this definition of what constitutes a Jewish citizen means that Mr. Harvey Smarba and any other Canadian citizen ‘of Jewish faith’ is, in FACT, someone who holds duel citizenship in both Canada and Israel. And, again, by definition and logic, this also means that Mr. Harvey Smarba and all members of the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada must either overtly or tacitly support the Israeli government’s domestic policies which are based upon a set of principles fundamentally in violation of Canadian provincial and national laws as well as international law, all of which stipulate that within a democratic state ALL citizens MUST be treated equally. Any arguments contrary to this basic international human right must be construed as being either sophistry or else blatant, transparent hypocrisy.
In other words the spurious charge by Mr. Harvey Smarba that I and my website are contriving ‘to promote ongoing hatred affecting persons identifiable as Jews and/or as citizens of Israel.’ is nothing less, based upon the facts surrounding the state of Israel’s domestic policies toward its citizens, than rank bigotry and a disingenuous and vexatious attempt to both slander and libel my name and that of my website while at the same time attempting to censor and suppress valuable, responsible coverage of the truth about the actual conditions which exist in Israel proper and in the surrounding areas of Palestine which have been illegally occupied and brutally exploited and controlled for decades now by the invading, imperialist Israeli Defense Forces.
Further to this, the examples available on numerous websites who monitor human rights violations, illustrate again and again the FACT that Israel treats its own non-Jewish citizens with great disdain and has been carrying on a program of ethnic cleansing within its undetermined borders since the state’s inception in 1948. This provable fact only reinforces the charge that the Israeli state holds all non-Jews, citizen or not, in complete disrespect and contempt. And without getting side-tracked on to related issues it can only be stated here that the prevalent attitude of the ‘Jewish’ state of Israel fully fits the description of the CHRC’s definition of ‘hatred’ and ‘contempt’ exemplified by the FACT that non-Jewish citizens and Gentiles not holding citizenship, are consistently and persistently subjected to the sort of contempt defined in your letter above and are ‘looked down upon, belittled, despised, dishonored or disgraced’ on a routine basis.
This is all I have to say at this time regarding the contentions of Mr. Harvey Smarba and the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada and would like to now say a few words in my own defense as to who I am, what efforts I have devoted my life to and, finally, why I consider this whole affair to be one politically motivated (and by definition in this case, religiously as well) and not, in any sense of the word, having to do with any ‘hatred’ toward Jews on my part or on the part of my website that publishes information on this topic.
Like Mr. Harvey Smarba, I too am a Canadian citizen, born in Saskatchewan in 1947 to a Ukrainian Mother and an English Father, prior, I might add, to the birth of the present state of Israel. In that same year I was Baptized a Christian and at this point in my life consider myself to be a person of ‘Christian faith’. As such I have attempted throughout my lifetime to actualize the teachings of Christ insofar as they pertain to treating others as one might like to be treated and to help build a world where the precepts of Christ Peace, Love, Brotherhood and Sisterhood for All would be a guide to harmony on a global scale. My efforts in this regard have been published and are on public record since the year 1968 when, at the young age of 21 I first began penning letters to newspapers in British Columbia voicing my opinion on matters related to politics, religion, human rights and social justice issues. A record of these writings exists and will corroborate all such material that I intend to further use should this matter go beyond this preliminary investigation.
Having spent the majority of my life thus far in a variety of pursuits I will only highlight those most relevant so as to give you, as an Investigator into this matter, and those to whom you must report, a general outline of my life and work.
I have lived, uninterruptedly, in the province of British Columbia since December of 1956. After leaving high school I attended university (SFU) in 1965 and there obtained a Professional Teaching Certificate. I worked for a short number of years in this capacity both in the public school system and for First Nations school districts, all of which were located in the province of B.C., and taught grades ranging from Kindergarten to Grade 5. I left the profession in 1978 and worked for the Provincial Parks Branch for 8 years where I was a Supervisor and Park Ranger in the Quesnel District of the Cariboo region of the province. After losing that profession to government restructuring in the late 1980’s I returned to teaching for a couple of years and worked for the Nuxalk Education Authority out of Bella Coola, B.C. in 1991 1992 where I taught on reserve Grades 2 and 3. From there I returned to Quesnel and worked in a substitute capacity for the local School District (#28) until I resigned in September of 1998. It was also during the year 1998 that I established my publishing business known as The Radical Press. From June of 1998 until June of 2002 I published a monthly, 24-page tabloid called The Radical which sold in retail outlets throughout B.C. and across Canada and by subscription around the world. Due to financial challenges the hard copy edition of the newspaper ceased in June of 2002 and from that date I carried on publishing online with my website known as http://www.radicalpress.com . In 2005, using my lifetime of personal experience in the log building trades and construction industry which I had developed in conjunction with my tenure as a school teacher I formed a carpentry business and have been operating said business up to this point in time. I have lived out in the country for the vast majority of my life, have build my own home, grown my own garden, and maintained a philosophy of independence both in thought and deed. Throughout the course of my life I have fathered four children and now, along with my dear wife of thirty years, also have been blessed with seven grandchildren.
In many respects my life has been an open book to the community in which I have resided since 1970. I began writing letters to the local Quesnel newspaper known as The Cariboo Observer, [email protected] beginning in 1976 and have steadily contributed to that publication over the ensuing years both as a regular columnist and an inveterate contributor on matters of public concern. While I would describe myself as a very controversial writer (and most, if not all of my readers would agree) I nonetheless need to stress the fact that throughout all the years of presenting my ideas to the general public on a number of issues ranging from politics to religion to social justice and environmental issues, I have never made any racist, hate-filled remarks against any person of Jewish or any other religious or ethic grouping. All this I state with respect to the present allegations made against me by Mr. Harvey Smarba and the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada; charges that they would fain convey to the public that insinuate I am a person who promotes hatred toward others, in this case Jews. The records of my writings would not, I suggest, indicate this to be the case.
As you stated in the above letter Ms. Kozak, there will be further opportunity to submit additional information and or evidence in support of my claim to innocence in this matter so with that in mind I will now conclude my response with a summary my position and then furnish you with the list of resources which I have relied upon in my quest for a greater understanding of this phenomenon known as Political Zionism and how it is affecting not only Canada but the world at large.
Summary
When I first received your unmarked, unregistered envelope in the mail Ms. Kozak, one containing the complaint from Mr. Harvey Smarba and the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada it didn’t come as a surprise. It was only a matter of time before my name and the name of my website would come up on Mr. Harvey Smarba’s hit list which he and the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada have been diligently and, I might assume, frantically compiling since they and the CJC were instrumental in changing the legal wording contained in Sec. 13 (1) of the Canadian Human Rights Act, immediately following the attack on the World Trade Center in New York city on September 11, 2001. For those still unaware Sec. 13 (1) deals with ‘Hate messages’ and prior to the new ‘‘interpretation’ of said legislation, applied only to the use of telephones. This controversial section reads as follows:
13. (1) It is a discriminatory practice for a person or a group of persons acting in concert to communicate telephonically or to cause to be so communicated, repeatedly, in whole or in part by means of the facilities of a telecommunication undertaking within the legislative authority of Parliament, any matter that is likely to expose a person or persons to hatred or contempt by reason of the fact that that person or those persons are identifiable on the basis of a prohibited ground of discrimination.
In the immediate aftermath of the horrendous attack upon the World Trade Center the Canadian government, acting upon misinformation and deceptive intelligence reporting from the USA, passed its new Anti-terrorism Act, c.41 on December 18th, 2001. That premature and misguided legislation, now included the following ‘Interpretation’ of Sec. 13 (1) which reads as follows:
Interpretation
(2) For greater certainty, subsection (1) applies in respect of a matter that is communicated by means of a computer or a group of interconnected or related computers, including the Internet, or any similar means of communication, but does not apply in respect of a matter that is communicated in whole or in part by means of the facilities of a broadcasting undertaking.
This is precisely what the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada and the Canadian Jewish Congress were waiting for. Now they had the legal pretext within which they could begin their assault upon any individual or group who they felt was a threat to the national interests of the state of Israel. This in itself was rather revealing considering that within months of the attack a vast number of people around the world were already cognizant of the numerous discrepancies surrounding the so-called ‘Official’ investigation into the causes and the culprits involved in this heinous act. Since 9/11 there has been a steady growth in the numbers of people who have examined the evidence and are now fully aware of the fact that the attack was not one by Arab terrorists with box cutters but was, in fact, orchestrated by forces within the US government; forces that also were found to be directly linked to a number of incidents which indicated to a great degree that the state of Israel, and in particular their intelligence service known as the Mossad, were directly complicit with the insiders working within the US government in the attack. Since 9/11 there have been endless efforts on the part of the survivors and families of the victims to have an independent inquiry carried out but to date all such efforts have been quashed by the US government. The event of 9/11 has precipitated untold misery and death and destruction and has led the world into a continuous state of fear and insecurity and provided the excuse or ‘false flag’ for all the subsequent imperialist wars in Afghanistan and Iraq; wars without just cause and based upon lies and fabrications that have all since been proven false beyond a doubt. What most people though have failed to realize is that President GW Bush’s so-called‘War on Terror’ has also been a direct result of the 9/11 event and stands as a perfect metaphor for what has been happening in Israel since 1948 where a continuous state of war has existed against the Palestinian people and other Arab states, all of which are intertwined with an ongoing program of terror that has persisted throughout Israeli’s close to 60 year history. Now we are seeing this same phenomenon expanded on a global scale thanks to the many Zionist ideologues who have been shaping US foreign policy since at least the time of President Woodrow Wilson. And to keep these issues hidden away from the public consciousness is, I maintain, one of the foremost reasons why front organizations such as League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada are desperately attempting to silence all debate on either Israeli policies or Zionist ideology here in Canada.
When I say that it came as no surprise that Harvey Smarba and the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada had me on their hit list I base this on the fact that in the May 24, 2007 edition of The Globe and Mail an article entitled ‘‘Website promotes hate, B’nai Brith member says’ http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20070524.wbcrights24/BNStory/Technology/home by the writer, Sid Tafler, stated, ‘The B.C. representative for the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada has filed a human-rights complaint alleging a Victoria-based website [ http://www.PEJ.org ] and its editors, manager and directors ‘contrive to promote ongoing hatred affecting persons identifiable as Jews and/or as citizens of Israel.’’ Further on the article states: ‘Mr. Smarba says other Canadian-based websites are being examined for possible complaints before the commission. We have to show that Canadian law extends to the Internet as well as the conventional printed word,’ he said.
This, I soon realized, was but one of many similar assaults upon Canadians and their treasured right to freedom of speech which I discovered as I began researching this issue more fully. Now I see a much larger pattern emerging with the addition of more and more similar charges being laid against individuals, media outlets and websites and even mainstream political parties. Individuals such as Paul Fromm of the Canadian Association for Free Expression http://www.canadianfreespeech.com who only recently had his longstanding teaching certificate revoked because of the actions of these pro-Zionist censors. Mainstream news magazines such as MacLean’s are also not immune to this insidious disease called censorship that’s sweeping across the nation. See Canada’s Thought Police http://www.nypost.com/seven/12162007/postopinion/editorials/canadas_thought_police_72483.htm . Attacks upon Christians and their organizations have always been standard fare for Zionists and it appears that such actions are on the rise again. We only need witness such Christian sites as Free Dominion http://www.freedominion.ca (which received a similar letter as I and others on July 16th, 2007 containing a demand for a full response by July 18th!). See http://www.gopetition.com/petitions/a-free-dominion-against-the-hrcs.html for their explanation and reaction to this attack. Now even mainstream political parties such as the Christian Heritage Party, http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2007/nov/07112706.html (who received their ‘letter’ on November 27th, 2007), have been subjected to this same process of intimidation and vilification, all of which, I contend, is designed to reinforce this absurd and highly unreasonable and undemocratic, ideologically-driven notion that any criticism of any minority, (but especially the Jewish minority in Canada), is to be met with swift, draconian repercussions by a Commission that was once set up to ensure equal rights for ALL Canadians rather than the present situation wherein an extremely small group of religious zealots within the B’nai Brith and the Canadian Jewish Congress have basically usurped a governmental process and are using it to promote their own racist, hate-filled agenda; one, I contend, that treats Canadians and their democratic ideals and institutions with utter disdain and contempt and threatens a way of life that the majority of Canadians do not wish to give up.
This unsavory business of thought control over Canadians had its early beginnings prior to the advent of the internet when people like Harvey Smarba and the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada and the Canadian Jewish Congress basically had free rein with their ambitions to squelch any and all criticism they deemed anti-Zionist. Working with a complicit Zionist-controlled media they used its power and influence to vilify whomever they felt was deserving of their smear campaigns. It was then that Mr. Smarba made a name for himself back in 1997 when he brought a complaint against Mr. Doug Collins and the Northshore News in North Vancouver to the B.C. Human Rights Commission. But now it appears these initial successes have gone to their heads to the point where they are rampaging about cyberspace like some renegade band of vigilantes from the Simon Wiesenthal Center, convinced that they are still hunting down Nazi ‘war criminals’.
Another even earlier case was that of Malcolm Ross, a Christian author and teacher living in New Brunswick, who opposed the machinations of the Talmudic Zionists and their hate-filled attacks upon Christians and Christianity (see his book Spectre of Power) and was subsequently nailed to the cross and lost his livelihood due to a complaint laid with the Human Rights Commission that was eventually upheld by the Supreme Court of Canada. I would venture to say that what Mr. Ross was trying to convey to the general public at the time of his trials and persecution is likely no different than the message that I and others are still trying to give to you today. The only difference is that at the time when Mr. Ross was attempting to present his case to the general public he didn’t have the Internet to reach out beyond his local area and thus became another victim of the circumscribed and reprehensible Zionist media who tarred and feathered him with their usual epithets of ‘anti-Semitism’ and ‘Holocaust denial’ and ‘hatred toward Jews’ and so on and the public was given no alternative perspective upon which to base any rational, balanced opinion.
Back in 1999 I was carrying articles by the British Author and Internationally-renowned lecturer David Icke http://www.davidicke.com who was coming to Canada on speaking tours and book promotions. During that time he was constantly harassed and abused by these organizations to the point of violent confrontations via some of their more sleazy organs like the Anti-Racist Action (ARA) committee. Accusations of Icke being a hate-monger and an anti-Semite abounded. Most disturbing in the present context of all that’s happening is the fact that lawyers directly connected with the CHRC were playing major roles in this harassment and in the encouraging of such illegal actions by the ARA. I recall the words of David Icke at the time when he said, ‘Have you ever noticed that those who dub others as purveyors of hate have hate in their hearts? And that those who claim to be anti-fascist act in every way like the fascists?’
Then there’s the case of the Canadian Website Publisher Reni Sentana-Ries of Edmonton who recently was sentenced to 16 months in jail for the crime of offending Jews. On and on and on, case after case it is always this 1% or less of the Canadian population who seems hell-bent on turning Canada into some Orwellian nightmare where people are coerced and cajoled through fear and intimidation and litigation into thinking that they have to keep their mouths shut or else some Bolshevik Cheka agent might appear at their door with a ‘complaint’ in hand and off they must go to try in vain to justify their existence before a ‘Tribunal’. The more one connects the dots the more insidious the whole affair appears and, quite frankly, it’s beginning to feel more and more like I’m a second-class Arab-Palestinian living in the racist, apartheid state of Israel rather than a Canadian citizen living in a country that once held freedom of speech and expression and thought in the highest regard.
While doing this research I came upon a frightening set of statistics regarding your Commission’s record Ms. Kozak that gave me (again) serious pause for more concern. It appears that out of 46 Active and Past cases, of which the CHRC Tribunal ruled on 37, not a single respondent has ever won a Section 13 case! 100% of the respondents in every case were Caucasian. 98% of cases were brought against poor and/or working class respondents. 90.7% of the respondents were not represented by lawyers. From out of these 37 cases a total of $93,000 has been awarded in fines and special compensations since 2003. And to compound this amazing set of statistics we see that 35 respondents have been given lifetime speech bans (Cease and Desist orders) and if said orders are breached these people could face up to 5 years in prison!
Statistics such as these Ms. Kozak represent, for me, a shameful and black mark on Canada’s reputation as an open, just and democratic nation. When we begin to jail our own kind for expressing their views (such as occurred recently in the case of Ernst Zundel who now rots in a German prison cell because the Zionist Jews here in Canada and those that control the present German government didn’t like his peaceful, yet provocative, views on their version of history) we have already succumbed to the same level of fear that the non-Jewish citizens of Israel and Palestine are experiencing daily and the Chinese citizens are forced to live under in a Communist dictatorship where dissent is met with deadly and swift reprisal. Such regrettable behaviour Ms. Kozak, can only lead to further degradation and injustice as our nation begins its final descent down the slippery slope leading to fascism or some other form of totalitarian dictatorship. Not, I might add, a pleasant prospect as we move into the 21st Century.
And so I have noted and pondered all these related cases and how they somehow always end up like the proverbial chickens who return to their roost at night. Only in all these cases the chickens are returning to a hen house that contains a sly fox and that fox is not residing in there because he has the best interests of the chickens in mind. And so the question continually arises as to who Harvey Smarba and his ‘League’ truly represent and the only reasonable conclusion that I can come to, after looking at the fruits of their labour is that this organization is NOT concerned about the rights of ALL Canadians but, in fact, is solely concerned with pursuing its own agenda; one that places the interests of a foreign nation (Israel) above those of Canadians and one that is severely impinging upon the human rights of the other 99% of Canadians who much prefer to live in peace and freedom than in a constant state of terror and anxiety and fear. This, I would categorically state, is a blatant form of treason on the part of these organizations.
The last example that I will give here involves yet another legal challenge to these organizations and, I might add, to even the CHRC itself. I’m referring to Marc Lemire’s appeal to the Federal Court of Canada that is set for January 15th, 2008 at 9:30am 180 Queen Street W Toronto, Ontario and involves a direct challenge to the Canadian Human Rights Commission. As stated on the website of Paul Fromm’s: http://www.canadianfreespeech.com :
‘For the first time ever in history, the Canadian Human Rights Commission is being challenged by Marc Lemire in the Federal Court of Canada for its spying operations, abuses of the law, deception and agent provocateur agenda. Like some mobster in a U.S. trial who keeps invoking the Fifth Amendment, the CHRC is trying to keep the veil of secrecy wrapped tight around its spying operations on Canadian Internet dissidents. Its tool of choice is Section 37 of the Canada Evidence Act. This allows government representatives the ability to prevent disclosure (hide) and claim immunity over the disclosure of information that the CHRC alleges to be injurious to Canadian Government security and operations of a Federal agency. The evidence Marc Lemire is challenging before the Federal Court is explosive and will blow the whole agenda of the CHRC into the open. In a 300 page record, prepared by lead counsel Barbara Kulaszka, the abuse of Section 37 by the Commission was laid out in amazingly clear detail. Those 300 pages decimate the Canadian Human Rights Commission’s claims and expose the spying operations of Canada’s Thought Control apparatus.’
Again I must reiterate what I said at the beginning of this response: I am not passing judgment at this time on you or your Commission Ms. Kozak. What I am attempting to do is alert both you and the public to the fact that the actions of the CHRC are tending to create a negative perception of inequity in terms of meting out justice as this applies to the issue of freedom of speech and this perception ought to give the CHRC cause for serious reflection.
There is one last, missing factor in this ‘hate’ equation which Harvey Smarba and the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada have accused me of which needs to be mentioned. I feel it poignantly illustrates the absurdity of what is going on with respect to the danger of abuse inherent in such laws as Sec. 13(1) when exploited for partisan purposes by people and organizations such as Harvey Smarba and the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith. It also epitomizes the spuriousness of all the allegations and contentions which they have used in their attempt to harass and intimidate me by falsely and publicly accusing me of the crime of promoting ‘ongoing hatred affecting persons identifiable as Jews and/or as citizens of Israel.’ I now present this final factor to you Ms. Kozak and to the CHRC Tribunal as the culmination of my testimony to the frivolous and vexatious nature of these charges. For me to either admit to or accept that I am promoting hatred toward Jews would be tantamount to saying that I hate, rather than love and cherish beyond description, the one person in my life who has been wife and friend and companion to me over the last thirty years. For she too is Jewish.
Based therefore upon all that I have gleaned of this situation over the years Ms. Kozak I feel very strongly that organizations such as League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada and the CJC require investigation and that their seditious behaviour be curbed before our Canadian system of justice is turned into a Soviet ‘Star Chamber’ such as existed under the former Bolshevik Communist Dictator Josef Stalin. It behooves you and your Commission members to take heed of this situation and the information contained in this response and that you begin weighing the total of the repercussions which are likely to manifest in this nation if these foreign (Israeli) front organizations are given free rein over our media, our institutions, our economy and our judicial affairs. Such unethical, undemocratic and discriminatory practices, in my humble opinion, require immediate redress and therefore I feel it would be in the best interest of the vast majority of Canadians if a full and independent inquiry into the nature of these activities by the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith and the CJC were conducted forthwith and that the said inquiry be carried out without any undue influence by either of these two organizations in question and that no members of the inquiry be of ethnic Jewish origin or biased in favour of Israel in any manner.
As I sit here this morning at the start of a new year with my four month old grandson, Hunter, on my knee, reflecting on the type of country that he will inherit from his Grandpa and Grandma and his Dad and Mom I can’t help but feel an overwhelming sense of urgency with respect to the sorts of activities that are now going on in the sphere of human rights and freedoms in my country. For these reasons I also recall the words of William Blake who once wrote, ‘I shall not cease from mental fight, nor shall my sword sleep in my hand….’ and I leave you with them for they likely symbolize the hopes and dreams of all honest and vigilant Canadians who have fought and died so that our generation and future generations would have greater freedom and liberty and opportunity to live in peace and harmony and share the love that we all so desire for ourselves, our families, our friends and our communities. For the sake of Canada and our democratic way of life you owe this much to your country.
Beyond this I await your reply on these urgent matters and remain,
Sincerely,
Arthur Topham
Pub/Ed
The Radical Press
Canada’s Radical News Network
[email protected]
http://www.radicalpress.com
‘Digging to the root of the issues since 1998″

Post Script: Below please find my answers to the ten questions contained in your initial package of materials which I received on November 20th, 2007 as well as the bibliography of some of the books and articles which relate to this complaint and are used here as partial reference.
ANSWERS TO CHRC QUESTIONAIRE:
1. Do you own and/or control radicalpress.com? If not, do you know who own’s [sic] and/or controls this website?
Yes. I own and control radicalpress.com
2. What is the purpose of this website?
The Radical Press is a Sole Proprietorship business registered with the provincial government in Victoria, B.C. It was formed in 1998 when I began publishing a monthly alternative tabloid known as The Radical. The online version of this hard copy newspaper is known as Radicalpress.com . The purpose of the Radical Press and Radicalpress.com, like all news services, is to present to the general public news, information and opinions with which readers can better understand the world they are living in. The forum is provided, as is/was a Letters to the Editor page in The Radical, for public input, debate and feedback.
3. What is the intent of the information/documentation posted on this website?
See answer to Question #2.
4. Who is responsible for editing and/or posting the content of the information/documentation on this website?
I am.
5. How are the documents being posted on this website?
Documents are received from various writers on the net either via email or from their own websites or listserv or in hardcopy format or else written by myself and then republished on my site.
6. What is your relationship to radicalpress.com?
The Radical Press is my voice on the world wide web and the vehicle that I use to exercise my human right to freedom of the press and self-expression.
7. Who is the webmaster of this website?
I am the webmaster of radicalpress.com
8. Who is responsible for monitoring the forums on your website? What are your rules and regulations concerning the postings of messages on the forums? What is the criteria used to remove postings?
I am responsible for all aspects of monitoring the Radical Press forum. The rules and regulations are simple: no racist comments or articles are allowed. If this is discovered on the forum the post is removed and the poster is given a fair warning to not repeat their error. If they do they are deleted from the forum.
9. In reviewing your website, it would appear that radicalpress.com active [sic] links to organizations such as http://www.Stormfront.org . What is the purpose of making these links available and active?
Again, please see response to Question #2.
10. Who is your present Internet Service Provider (ISP)? Where is it located? Please provide a copy of the ISP’s arrangement. Please provide a copy of the agreement with ISP.
All information regarding my ISP, its location and whatever agreements I have with it, are of a private business nature no different than my bank account and credit card information and passwords, etc. No organization, including the CHRC, has a right to this information. I have committed no criminal act and therefore am entitled to retain my legal business rights.
I might add to this the fact that those responsible for making these false, slanderous and libelous accusations against my person and my website i.e. the B’nai Brith and their representative Harvey Smarba, appear to have had no problem in locating my previous server and pressuring them to cancel my former agreement. I would therefore suggest that you ask Harvey Smarba and the B’nai Brith this question if you so desire such information.
‘Also, please be advised that you are required to preserve any material related to this complaint, including information in electronic format, until the final disposition of the matter.’
This has not been possible in one case. When Harvey Smarba and the B’nai Brith or some other Zionist pressured my previous server into canceling my agreement with them I received a short notice on August 24, 2007 that the hosting service would cease as of August 31, 2007. This gave me very little time to arrange a database back up for the site and during that process that backup became corrupted. As a result I had to upload an earlier archived version when I resumed online publication on November 3, 2007 and that version didn’t contain the specific article which is included in the complaint. I’m referring here to the topic ‘The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion’. The url to the forum was still intact on the RadicalPress.com Home Page but the content had disappeared from off the forum itself and no link remained. I therefore removed the url from the Home Page of the site. The article exists on numerous other websites outside present-day Zionist Jew control. I have now reposted the article and it can be found at http://www.radicalpress.com/?page_id=601
It’s my contention concerning this matter that the site was purposely sabotaged by either the B’nai Brith or some other affiliated pro-Zionist person or organization.
——
BIBLIOGRAPHY OF REFERENCE BOOKS AND ONLINE MATERIALS:
URLS TO ARTICLES:
The Controversy of Zion
by Douglas Reed

Best Health & Wellness Promotional Products


What Price Israel?
by Alfred M. Lilienthal
http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=620
Of Jews, Gentiles & Journalistic Jerk-Offs
by Arthur Topham
July, 2000
http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=591
Dismantling the Infrastructure of Tyranny
By Arthur Topham
March 27, 2003
http://www.radicalpress.com/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=656
B’nai Brith: Beating the anti-Semitic Drum
By Arthur Topham
Sept. 3, 2005
http://www.radicalpress.com/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=1281
Epistle to Paul
by Arthur Topham
August 6, 2006
http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=90
Light Bringer or Faallen Angel?
Sorcha Faal, the Jews, the Nazis, the West and the Zionist Challenge
By Arthur Topham
Sept. 17, 2006

Light Bringer or Faallen Angel? Sorcha Faal, the Jews, the Nazis, the West and the Zionist Challenge


The Many Masks of Zionism
By Arthur Topham
January 9, 2007

The Many Masks of Zionism


The Seeds of Global Tyranny
Perennial Notes on Political Zionism
By Arthur Topham
May 1, 2007

The Seeds of Global Tyranny


Defining the Jewish State
by Israel Shahak
http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=617
Promise and Fulfulment: Palestine 1917 1949
By Arthur Koestler
http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=616
OT or NT? DARKNESS OR LIGHT? YOU decide!
http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=603
One Hundred Years of Jewish Solitude
By Gilad Atzmon
January 23rd, 2007
http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=364
The Politics of Anti-Semitism: Zionism, the Bund and Jewish Identity Politics
By Gilad Atzmon
November 29th, 2007
http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=554
THE PROTOCOLS OF POLITICAL ZIONISM
AKA THE PROTOCOLS OF THE LEARNED ELDERS OF ZION

THE PROTOCOLS


BOOKS:
The Holy Bible, King James Version, Thomas Nelson, Publishers
History of Zionism 1600 1918, Nahum Sokolow 1919 Longman, Green and Co. London
The International Jew: The World’s Foremost Problem, Henry Ford, Sr. 1920 CPA Book Publisher Boring Oregon
Insanity Fair, Douglas Reed 1938 Jonathan Cape Ltd. 30 Bedford Square London
Disgrace Abounding, Douglas Reed 1939 Jonathan Cape Ltd. 30 Bedford Square London
Nemesis?:The Story of Otto Strasser and The Black Front, Douglas Reed 1940 Houghton Mifflin Company Boston
From Smoke to Smother, Douglas Reed 1948 Jonathan Cape Ltd. 30 Bedford Square London
Far and Wide, Douglas Reed 1951 GSG & Associates [email protected]
The Controversy of Zion, Douglas Reed 1979, GSG & Associates [email protected]
also online at http://www.radicalpress.com/?page_id=34
The Iron Curtain Over America, John Beaty 1951 Chestnut Mountain Books Barboursville Virginia
The Palestine Diary, (Vol. 1&2) Robert John & Sami Hadawi 1970 New World Press New York N.Y.
Jewish History, Jewish Religion: The Weight of Three Thousand Years, Israel Shahak 1994 The Pluto Press Boulder Colorado
Promise and Fulfilment: Palestine 1917 1949, Arthur Koestler 1949 Macmillan & Co. Ltd. London
The Thirteenth Tribe, Arthur Koestler 1976 Random House Inc. New York
Trial and Error: The Autobiography of Chaim Weizmann, Chaim Weizmann 1947 Harper & Bro. England
Zionism: False Messiah, Nathan Weinstock 1969 Ink Links Ltd. London
Spectre of Power, Malcolm Ross 1987 Stronghold Publishing Co. Ltd. Moncton New Brunswick
Jews Against Zionism: The American Council for Judaism, 1942 1948, Thomas A. Kolsky Temple University Press Philidelphia
The Gulag Archipelago, (Vols. 1, 2, 3) Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn 1973 Harper & Row, Publishers New York
The Fateful Triangle: Israel, the United States, and the Palestinians, Noam Chomsky 1984 Black Rose Books Montreal Canada

{ Add a Comment }

THE CHINA EFFECT

[Editor’s Note: Thanks to Monika Sheardown for sending along these vital statistics regarding China. Now we can see what Henry Kissinger was working on when he first started traveling to China back in the 1970s! Ah, the sheer magnitude of beneficial blessings that come from a Zionist-inspired system euphemistically labeled “Communism”!!! 🙂 Ed.]
—————
From: Monika Sheardown [email protected]
Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2007
To: [email protected]
Subject: The China Effect
As you ponder buying more ‘Made in China’ goods during boxing day sales, here’s some interesting facts…
Very best,
-Monika
The China Effect
‘Per-capita income in China is less than 1/10 of America’s and its per-capita greenhouse gas emission is less than 1/5 of ours. But if 1.3 billion Chinese were to consume at the level Americans do, we’d need several more Earths. China’s effect on world resources, quantified:
China is :
* The world’s largest consumer of coal, grain, fertilizer, cell phones, refrigerators, and televisions
* The leading importer of iron ore, steel, copper, tin, zinc, aluminum, and nickel
* The top producer of coal, steel, cement, and 10 kinds of metal
* The No. 1 importer of illegally logged wood
* The third-largest producer of cars after Japan and the United States; by 2015, it could be the world’s largest car producer. By 2020, there could be 130 million cars on its roads, compared to 33 million now.
More Facts:
* China produces half of the world’s cameras, 1/3 of its television sets, and 1/3 of all the planet’s garbage.
* There are towns in China that make 60% of the world’s button supply, 1/2 of all silk neckties, and 1/2 of all fireworks.
* China uses half of the world’s steel and concrete and will probably construct half of the world’s new buildings over the next decade.
* Some Chinese factories can fit as many as 200,000 workers.
* China used 2.5 billion tons of coal in 2006, more than the next three highest-consuming nations-Russia, India, and the United States-combined.
* It has more than 2,000 coal-fired power plants and puts a new one into operation every 4 to 7 days.
* Between 2003 and 2006, worldwide coal consumption increased as much as it did in the 23 years before that. China was responsible for 90% of the
increase.
* China became the world’s top carbon dioxide emitter in 2006, overtaking the United States.
* Russia is China’s largest timber supplier; half of all logging there is illegal. In Indonesia, another timber supplier to China, up to 80% of all logging takes place illegally.
* 90% of all wood products made in China are consumed in the country, including 45 billion pairs of wooden chopsticks each year.
* The value of China’s timber-product exports exceeds $17 billion. About 40 percent go to the United States.
* More than 3/4 of China’s forests have disappeared; 1/4 of the country’s land mass is now desert.
* Until recently, China was losing a Rhode Island-sized parcel of land to desertification each year.
* 80% of the Himalayan glaciers that feed Chinese rivers could melt by 2035.
* In 2005, China’s sulfur-dioxide emissions were nearly twice those of the United States.
* Acid rain caused by air pollution now affects 1/3 of China’s land.
* Each year, at least 400,000 Chinese die prematurely of air-pollution- linked respiratory illnesses or diseases.
* A quarter of a million people die because of motor-vehicle traffic each year-6 times as many as in the United States, even though Americans have 18
times as many cars.
* Of the world’s 20 most polluted cities, 16 are in China.
* Half of China’s population-600 to 700 million people-drinks water contaminated with human and animal waste. A billion tons of untreated sewage is dumped into the Yangtze each year.
* 4/5 of China’s rivers are too polluted to support fish.
* The Mi Yun reservoir, Beijing’s last remaining reliable source of drinking water, has dropped more than 50 feet since 1993.
* Overuse of groundwater has caused land subsidence that cost Shanghai alone $12.9 billion in economic losses.
* Dust storms used to occur once a year. Now, they happen at least 20 times a year.
* Chinese dust storms can cause haziness and boost particulate matter in the United States, all the way over to Maine.
* In 2001, a huge Chinese storm dumped 50,000 metric tons of dust on the United States. That’s 2.5 times as much as what U.S. sources produce in a typical day.
* Currently, up to 36 percent of man-made mercury emissions settling on America originated in Asia.
* Particulate matter from Asia accounts for nearly half of California’s annual pollution limit.
* Environmental damage reportedly costs China 10 percent of its GDP. Pollution-related death and disability heath care costs alone are estimated at up to 4 percent of GDP.
* In 2005, there were 50,000 pollution-related disputes and protests in China.
* China’s middle class is expected to jump from 100 million people today to 700 million people by 2020.
————
These statistics are drawn from ‘The Last Empire: Can the world survive China’s rush to emulate the American way of life?’ in the current issue of Mother Jones.

{ Add a Comment }

‘The Shell Game’ Just Another Zionist Scam to Stop 9/11 Investigation of Israel

Hi All,
What follows is an e-mail exchange between myself and Steven Alten, author of ‘The Shell Game which has been touted and promoted by some people in the 9/11 Truth Movement. I became suspicious that this book was just another misleading Arab-bashing, Israel-pleasing work which only points fingers at the Zionist-approved list of ‘usual subjects including the puppet king Bush. Many of us have come to the realization that Israel has played a major role in 9-11 (PNAC, dancing Israeli spies, Odigo, Wolfowitz Doctrine, The Clean Break, Netanyahu and Silverstein phone buddies, Israeli security in charge of US airports, Marvin Bush in charge of security of WTC at time of attacks, implosions, explosions, Silverstein said on video ‘they decided to pull it with regards to WTC building 7 which was not even hit by a jet, and it takes weeks to set up an implosion, the resulting ‘war on terror based on false info provided by Israels Mossad, and so on and so forthsee the DVDs and research on the internet using google). Therefore any book, DVD, film or article which does not point to or even allude to the role of Israel in 9-11 is obfuscating and hiding the Truth about 9-11.
Read on…
Wendy
*****
Hi Steven,
With regards to your book ‘The Shell Game and my question ‘Why is it that you do not mention the Israeli connection to 9-11 and oil?,
these are my guesses for your possible answer(s):
#1) In order to get your book published and distributed in the US, you realize you have to avoid offending Jewish interests and anything that might offend Jewswhich of course would be the obvious Jewish-American/Israeli connection to 9-11 (see: http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/9-11neocon.php )and also the Jewish-American/Israeli ambition to dominate the oil resources (see: http://www.marwenmedia.com/articles_images/SecretRelationship.html ) in the Middle East.
#2) Somehow, you have been unaware of such information.
#3) You are aware of such information but you simply dont believe it, and prefer to believe the Zionist-approved propagandistic version that it was just big bad corporations, politicians such as Bush & Cheney and Saudi Arabia that is behind the false flag INSIDE JOB operation of the 9-11 attacks.
#4) You believe it is an ‘anti-Semitic canard to believe in such ‘conspiracy theories which involve any Jewish Americans or Israeli-Americans or Israelis in the 9-11 attacks.
I am eagerly awaiting your response.
Sincerely,
Wendy Campbell
Director of the following documentaries:
‘Truth: Exposing Israeli Apartheid
‘Rosa Remembers Palestine
‘Neturei Karta: Jews Against Zionism
‘Syria: Land of Friendly People and Hidden Treasure
****
Steven Alten, author of ‘The Shell Game replies to Wendy:
on 12/28/07 9:01 PM, [email protected] at [email protected] wrote:
Hi, Wendy
Wow. Actually, the Israeli situation, detailed in Crossing the Rubicon, did not play into my plot. Do I believe agents were following hijackers before 9/11? Yes. I also believe Israel is one of our most important allies, the one true democracy in the Middle East, and that they did warn Bush in the beginning.
Please remember, I couldn’t toss in every aspect of the 9/11 truth movement investigations and still expect the mainstream reader to accept the book’s truths. You have to pick and choose. The objective was to show how Bush and Cheney committed treason and where their acts can lead. I detailed an awful lot, but I still needed to keep the plot moving in a thriller matter or lose the audience.
The success of the book can crack open the door. Then you can kick it in!
Sincerely
Steve Alten
****
Wendy replies to Steve:
Hi Steve,
Thanks for getting back to me. I appreciate your response and the fact that you didnt get offended by my message to you. I shall have to check out ‘Crossing the Rubicon.
May I point out some facts to you which you may have missed or have not taken into consideration with regards to your conclusions? Here we go:
I am glad that you believe Israeli agents were following the hijackers before 9-11, but I am surprised that you dont seem to be aware of the Israeli spies high-fiving it while taping the attacks themselves (google ‘dancing Israeli spies) which pretty much proves they had foreknowledge and were actually probably taping the results of their own efforts while working for the Mossadas in it is very likely that they planted the explosives themselves in the World Trade Center buildings 1, 2 and 7 (which was not even hit by a jet) all buildings owned by Larry Silverstein, who is best friends with super Zionist hawk Netanyahuone of the writers of PNAC (Project for New American Centurythe blueprint for 9-11 and rolling out the war on the Middle East, starting with Iraq and Afghanistan as called for in this document which was based on ‘A Clean Break which was based on ‘The Wolfowitz Doctrine). As you can probably see by now, I firmly believe that the Israelis and Israeli-Americans, such as Silverstein, such as Netanyahu, such as Wolfowitz, such as Perle, and their colleagues actually orchestrated 9-11. In their PNAC doctrine, they stated that they needed a ‘Pearl Harbor-style event to happen to start on the empire building, and so that was 9-11.
But even if the Israeli agents were just ‘following the hijackers as you believe, then doesnt that make them complicit collaborators? Or at the very least, why didnt they directly tell authorities which could have prevented 9-11 from happening? Please dont tell me they wanted not to reveal that they were Israeli spies! Surely there could be a way around that! At the very least, like for instance when the Israeli company Odigo (actually a front for the Mossad) headquartered in WTC got the warnings that there was going to be a hitcouldnt any of the Mossad agents who knew what was about to happen have at least anonymously called into the building authorities and the NYC police and NY fire dept to warn people of a bomb or something (instead of just calling their own pals at Odigo)?
With ‘allies like Israel, who needs enemies? Israel did not in any serious way ‘warn Bush. The Mossad just sent their usual torrent of information with no specifics. Again, why couldnt they even have at the very least anonymously tipped off the authorities in NY and the WTC with regards to a bomb scare? I believe its because they not only wanted it to happen the way it did, but they orchestrated it, to benefit Israels ambitions, as in enlisting to US to fight Israels warseveryone who participated got to keep their jobs and line their pockets with the war-time profiteering.
And how can you possibly believe that the Jewish state of Israel is the ‘one true democracy in the Middle East when obviously it is a Jewish supremacist state which has been systematically and continually embarking on a campaign of ethnic cleansing against non-Jews since day one of Israels creation in 1948? Israel is actually a theocracy, which has apartheid policies and an on-going campaign of ethnic-cleansing against non-Jews, and provides equal rights for Jews ONLY. Israel is a Jewish supremacist, nationalistic, socialistic country. Sound familiar? Zionism is actually the twin to Nazism, if Truth be known. Perhaps you might want to read Joel Kovels new book ‘Overcoming Zionism and also get some history about ‘The Origin of the Palestine-Israel Conflict written by Jews for Justice in the Middle East which can be found at: http://www.cactus48.com .
Israel is not even a true democracy for Jews since marriage between Jews and non-Jews is not allowed to happen legally in Israel.
As far as I am concerned, any book or report that overlooks the Israeli connection to 9-11 is pure misinformation/disinformation and I simply do not have time for that. I care ONLY for the Truth and the usual Arab-bashing and pointing fingers at the puppets without looking at the underlying cause (which is Zionism and greed for money, oil and power amongst all the collaborators behind 9-11, Jewish and non-Jewish ) is simply non-productive, misleading and irresponsible.
The root cause must be examined and dealt with or else endless war will continue.
By the way, just out of curiosityare you Jewish ? In case you are interested, I am not.
Sincerely,
Wendy Campbell
PS Here are a couple links to help you understand the Truth about 911:
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/9-11neocon.php
http://www.realnews247.com/stranger_than_fiction.htm
http://incogman.wordpress.com/2007/12/16/coming-out-all-over-911-was-an-inside-job/
Books to read include: ‘9-11 Evil by Victor Thorne and Lisa Guiliani, and ‘9-11 Enigma: The Israeli Connection by Justin Raimondo of http://www.antiwar.com and writings by Christopher Bollyn (see: http://www.bollyn.com)
****
Steve replies to Wendy:
—— Forwarded Message
From: [email protected]
Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2007 13:03:06 EST
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Why is it that you do not mention the Israeli connection to 9-11 and oil??
Wendy
I think your views are seriously warped. And flat out wrong. There are no LAWS in Israel preventing intermarriage. Religion and government are separate factions. Perhaps teh Orthodox Jews do not acceppt inter-marriage, but the reform do. regardless, it is NOT a law!
I seriously doubt Mossad agents allowed themselves to be filmed high fiving. And news footage from Israel showed the population WEEPING after the WTC went down…as opposed to high fiving Palestinians.
I would categorize your views as anti-semetic.
I would also say your views are what kills credibility in the 9/11 movement.
:38 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, [email protected] writes:
‘As far as I am concerned, any book or report that overlooks the Israeli connection to 9-11 is pure misinformation/disinformation and I simply do not have time for that.’
And I have no time for you.
SA
******
Wendy replies to Steve:
Steven,
I KNOW your views are seriously misinformed.
For instance, it is NOT possible for Jews to legally marry non-Jews in Israel. PERIOD. Do your research! A marriage between a Jew and a Non-Jews performed inside Israel is NOT considered legal in Israel.
And since Israel is a Jewish state by its own proclamation and ONLY allows completely equal rights amongst JEWS ONLY, then OBVIOUSLY Israel is a theocracy and NOT a true democracy.
And, no, the Mossad agents were not FILMED high-fiving, but witnesses SAW them high-fiving WHILE THEY were filming the 9-11 terrorist attacks and explosions happening in the WTC. These guys were then arrested and questioned and held for a while by US authorities, but Chertoff (an Israeli-American) let them go back to Israel.
These same high-fiver guys were later interviewed on an Israeli TV talk show, and this can be seen if you search for it on YouTube OR you can buy the DVD of the movie which includes the footage the movie is by a Jewish American film-maker Marc Levin who was trying to disprove Israeli involvement in 9-11 HOWEVER he inadvertently made the case that Israel was involved in 9-11 even stronger and that is why he could not get wider distribution for his film whose title is ironically ‘Protocols of Zion.
And arent you aware that the Zionized US mainstream media which almost never shows anything negative about Israel or the truth about its ethnic cleansing and racist, apartheid regime, showed the footage of dancing Palestinians, a clip that was taken completely out of context and not at all related to 911 as it was shot much earlier than that, did that to propagandize Americans further into hating Arabs and Palestinians? All the while the mainstream media downplayed the story of the ‘dancing Israelis who were actually caught filming the attacks on the WTC on 9-11! Dont tell me you havent heard of that!
I would categorize YOUR views as philo-Semitic and misinformed and biased.
I would also say that your views are what help to obfuscate the Truth in the 9/11 TRUTH movement. I see you omitted the word Truth in your sentence regarding ‘credibility in the 9/11 movement…
I surmise it was an unconscious but TELLING omission.
Sincerely,
Wendy Campbell
NOTE FROM WENDY TO READERS: In short, Steve Altens book ‘The Shell Game is nothing more ‘revealing and ‘daring than Zionist-controlled Michael Moores film ‘Fahrenheit 9/11. If you thought that was a great film, then you will probably love ‘The Shell Game. As Steve has said in his own words, he believes that ‘Israel is one of our most important allies, the one true democracy in the Middle East, and that they did warn Bush in the beginning. I rest my case that this book is nothing but misinformation and a waste of any real 9-11 Truth-seekers time. — WC

{ Add a Comment }

The peace they promise is never-ending war by John Kaminski

If there were such a crime as treason by ignorance, most Americans would be guilty of it. But the worst kind of treason comes from those who know the truth but don’t speak it.
Throughout its history, but even more vividly in recent days, the United States has revealed itself to be a warmongering liar, with a president who is a proven criminal directing a heartless staff of homicidal maniacs, invading one defenseless country after another, blaming others for crimes the U.S. commits, and wreaking destruction and chaos that kills innocent people in one-sided wars that never seem to end.
Our leaders, with deliberate intent paid for by foreign special interests, are destroying our own country, by implementing measures unquestionably harmful to the interests of American citizens, while simultaneously praised by writers with big salaries in quest of fame and fortune at the expense of the truth. The latest atrocity is an Army document that calls for snipers to shoot the principal organizers of dissident political rallies <http://www.globalresearch.ca/police-state-us-military-plans-to-crush-dissident-political-groups-target-leaders-with-sniper-fire/5398485> which mainstream media will never touch.
That the American people have not risen up and jailed these leaders who have deliberately destroyed the country is a sure testament to their mental incapacitation due to an array of debilitating processes that have not only lowered their IQs but undermined their will to challenge the lies they are constantly told. Even as the government steals everything they have, those who can recognize the scams being played on them are terrified into silence at the prospect of losing the meager possessions they still possess.
Intelligent or not, the average American citizen not only has no input or effect on what the U.S. government does, he or she has absolutely no way to meaningfully communicate with any department of the American government, failing the critical requirement of being able to place at least tens of thousands of dollars into the hands of some elected representative who will at least pretend to plead your case to his peers.
But even worse than that is the realization is that most Americans have no desire to even protest the criminal maneuvers that have eroded and polluted the quality of life they possessed when they were children. This paralysis has been made possible by famous TV talking heads who defend government lies and repeat false assertions concocted by spinmeisters while being paid handsomely to dupe the public and increase the bankers’ ill-gotten gain.
Due to the effects of electronic hypnosis through media, diminished brain function caused by debilitating chemicals in food and in the air, and the inestimable harm caused by a medical profession that values profits over optimal health — all reinforced by public media owned by the same people who are committing these crimes — Americans are no longer capable of distinguishing fact from fiction, or the truth from the lies that are now destroying all life on this planet.
How else can you explain the danger that our elected and appointed officials have put us in? Were those children in Sandy Hook actually killed? Did they ever really exist? Do you think you know the answer?
How else can you explain ISIS, funded by U.S. government money, run by an Israeli posing as a Muslim dissident, then bombed by the U.S. military as it pretends to defend the puppet government it installed in Iraq?
What perverse program enabled many thousands of Central American residents posing as homeless children to cross the U.S. border and be welcomed with open arms by a government that values their welfare far above that of taxpaying Americans who are suffering from the loss of jobs throughout the country? One school in Massachusetts reported that its new students from south of the border appear to be older than some of the teachers!
Tonight as you read this, the U.S. government is preparing to start World War III in the Ukraine over lies they have created that would never be believed by a society functioning at normal mental capacity. Today’s headline in USAToday accused Russia of lying about what it is doing in Ukraine, when the reality of the situation is that the USA started this extermination program, replaced the Ukrainian government with its own Israeli hit men, and now seems eager to start a war that would destroy much of the world, lying every step of the way about what is really happening.
How could normal Americans, if any remain, ever put up with this pathological behavior?
The hazards to your health have never been more serious, and the situations have been deliberately created by the people supposed to protect you.
It’s unsafe to put your children into public schools. If the poisoned medicines they are prescribed don’t ruin their lives, the deliberately misleading information they are taught will.
It’s unsafe to buy your food at the supermarket. Due to corruption at the highest levels of government food inspection and the takeover of virtually all farms by megacorporations who own the government, there is no incentive to provide healthy foods, only to seek healthy profits, and the result is the constant poisoning of the consumer, which benefits the following profession.
It’s unsafe to go to a doctor. The move afoot to ban vitamins and traditional medicines combined with the forced popularity of procedures known to be harmful such as radiation and chemotherapy guarantee that your life will be shortened and your wallet emptied by relying on allopathic medicine to maximize your longevity. Instead of curing diseases, mainstream doctors working for the government are busy inventing and perpetuating them for profit.
It’s unsafe to believe what you read in mainstream media. With all media outlets now owned by only six corporations, which are all owned by the same ethnic group, the chances of getting objective and healthful information from any one of them is absolutely zero.
It’s unsafe to challenge any public official for fear of reprisal, fear of attack by the IRS or private mercenary group. The government has quashed the Freedom of Information Act and conducts most of its business in secret so that members of the government might illegally profit from secret negotiations that are never revealed to the public. The highest art form of this technique occurs when the police are able to steal your property without ever charging you with a crime, which happens frequently in every state.
It’s unsafe to point out crimes by cops and the military. You can expect retaliation, discrimination and perhaps the loss of your life if you attempt such a maneuver.
And most critically, it is supremely unsafe to note the fact that Jews control every aspect of our society — TV, universities, book publishing, you name it — which is why all these other maladies have turned America from an open hearted compassionate society to a self-focused regiment of brain dead zombies ready to sell out their neighbors for a few bucks.
We are bludgeoned into keeping our mouths shut at the constant and increasing crimes by our government by a perverted phalanx of pathetic journalists who are compelled to assist the lies of a government intent on destroying the country.
Who are this nation’s famous journalists? In order to gain fame, they have to keep the secret that has destroyed this country and is destroying the world.
One by one you’ve seen those who try to tell the truth ridiculed and banished from the public eye. Helen Thomas. Rick Sanchez. Joe Sobran. Douglas Reed. Ezra Pound. Each of them ruined for trying to tell the truth. The suppression of the truth that they tried to tell you about has destroyed America, and has enabled the plastic, pre positioned politicians to work their sabotage on the republic.
When politicians say peace, they really mean war. The reporters and editors who repeat their words opposing the facts they know to be true are principally responsible for this confusion that has muddled the minds of Americans, and by their deliberately selfish actions have committed the worst kind of treason to humanity.
The choice of all writers is fame vs. truth. Truth brings poverty and disdain. Fame is bought by the lies writers choose to tell, lies that erode the stability of America.
The disease that ails America and infects the entire world with its ruinous double meanings and insidious corruption is Jewish influence, which has totally ruined the principles of honest dealings with our fellow human beings with this poisonous supremacist claptrap that it’s OK to screw your neighbor, kill your parents and prostitute your children as long as you make a lot of money out of the deal.
Tragically, this is what most people believe and it is why life on this planet is about to come to a sorry finish. The natural forces that have been unleashed by this malevolent bunch of kosher psychopaths to gather the wealth of the world into their own pockets and to hell with everybody else are about to cost every living thing on this planet the one thing they value most, and the one thing that they cannot replace under any circumstances.
Which in case you can’t figure that out would be your life.
For you to remain silent about the Jewish threat that has ruined the functional and rewarding lives that we have lived is akin to committing suicide, and the majority of the brain damaged American citizens appear intent on doing just that.
It would be a simple matter to stop this slide into ruin. Simply recognize what the Jews are doing to every society they can get their hands on, and stop them from doing it in a definitive and permanent way.
Otherwise, compassionate, sensible and thoughtful humans have no future whatsoever, only an endless stretch of the big sleep with their eyes wide open.

{ Add a Comment }

An Open Letter to all Truth Deniers & Holocaust Believers By Arthur Topham

[Editor’s Preface:
What sparked this open letter to those who still believe in what historical revisionist and author Arthur R. Butz called ‘The Hoax of the Twentieth Century: The Case Against the Presumed Extermination of European Jewry’ (the title of his 1976 book that demolished forever the mythological basis for what, in my estimation, was, and remains, the most colossal and earth-threatening lie ever to have been told to mankind) was a comment from a person (Nick Inglis) on a post that I had submitted to a local Quesnel, B.C. Facebook group of which I was a member at the time. It was the standard ‘guilty by association’ ploy that both Jews and their deluded gentile lackeys in the west perpetually use whenever they don’t have anything intelligent to offer to a debate. In this case the fellow who posted it appeared to be a member of the science faculty at a B.C. university in the southern region of the province. Given that the author of comment represented what might be called a member of Canada’s intelligentsia I felt it was time to inform those of his mindset of a few things that they were unwittingly overlooking in their efforts to sustain this massive falsification that has plagued the world since 1945.]
_______
Dear Nick Inglis, Truth Deniers & Holocaust Believers:
While out getting firewood yesterday I got to thinking about your August 16th comment on the WTF Quesnel FB group where you had remarked on a post of mine, ‘I wonder what Councillor Thapar would think about being used as a reference to support a Holocaust denier.’
Apart from the fact that your words were obviously meant to imply ‘guilt by association’ between myself and Quesnel City Councillor Sushil Thapar, thus reflecting badly on the councillor, that aspect of your comment wasn’t what I was meditating on while falling the beetle-killed pines along the Cariboo roadside.
It appears (from clicking on your FB profile) that you have begun a new job with the Biology Faculty at Kwantlen Polytechnic University in Surrey, B.C. It was this point that caught my attention and got me thinking further about your remark concerning the fact that I don’t believe in the 6 Million myth and therefore am a prime candidate for labelling as a ‘Holocaust denier’ by the Zionist Jews and those like yourself who support their psychopathy.
As someone who appears to be involved in science it begs the question as to why you would be so quick to make such an accusation against me and also why you would be buying into the ‘Holocaust’ fiction in the first place given that your profession rests, for the most part, upon reason, logic and provable facts rather than assertions, accusations, emotions and beliefs (as odd, inconceivable and incomprehensible as they may be).
As a scientist I’m certain you must be aware of the situation that the 16th Century Italian physicist, mathematician, astronomer and philosopher Galileo found himself in when he discovered (thanks to his newly designed telescope) that his predecessor Nicolaus Copernicus’ theory that the Earth and all of the planets actually revolved around the Sun rather than the opposite world view one that postulated the Earth was the center of our Universe was, in fact, true.
You must also be aware of the persecution, ignominy and lifetime incarceration that Galileo underwent thanks to the machinations of the Roman Catholic Church when he refused to recant his position, all of which relates to this 20th century phenomenon that the Jews have, with wilful and intentional malice, forced upon the world via their monopolistic control of all major media sources coupled with their inordinate financial and political influence over western nations and politicians (as has now become so patently obvious during the latest round of genocide in Gaza wherein no western ‘leader’ has shown the courage or fortitude to question and demand a stop to the needless slaughter of thousands of innocent men, women and especially children).
It was the Renaissance Nick that first gave birth to what we now call the Scientific Method a time, after centuries of darkness and ignorance, when man’s inquisitive and skeptical mind and spirit of inquiry finally burst forth in open opposition to the then accepted Authority of the day. Without this method of approaching any hypothetical question and proving it with verifiable facts the world would still be held in throng to superstition and religious speculation rather than actual truth. Given this new reality that the world adopted over four hundred years ago I fail to understand how you, as a scientist, can equate (and justify) making ILLEGAL the questioning of anything; be it a scientific theory, an accepted fact of nature or, even the fiction of ‘6 Million Jews’ having been gassed to death and then cremated in ovens in German occupied territory during WW2?
Cannot you see that, in this particular case, i.e., the 6 Million myth, you are being confronted with the ONLY exception to the scientific methodology upon which your profession and all scientific professions rest? Why is it that, in this one instance, you are somehow able to suspend your understanding of the scientific method of discovery and suddenly accept, on hearsay and proven contrived ‘evidence’, that governments, under the influence of one small religious cult, can actually legislate laws that make it an indictable offence to question this fiction or anything else for that matter? Where does freedom of thought and inquiry play into this diabolical farce? Where does common sense and the basics of scientific research come in? Where, in truth, does anything logical or reasonable come into play when anyone, be they a government or a religious group (as in the case of the Jews) or an individual, is able to make it illegal to question any matter of history or any event or anything that may be theorized, ranging from the scientific up through the branches of philosophy and art to even the spiritual pinnacle of theological speculation?
One would think (reasonably and logically) that if any statement, of all the myriad questions that mankind has considered throughout history, ought to meet such a criterion and be prohibited by law it would be the denial of God rather than a purported historic event that has countless loopholes in it which would prevent it from becoming accepted by the whole world (scientific or otherwise) as an unquestionable fact. In other words are we to remain free to question the existence of the Creator Himself yet unable to question, based upon scientific evidence or otherwise, the fraudulent claims of the Zionist Jews who, through cunning and conspiracy, plus the heavily weighted influence of their purse and their control of all aspects of our major sources of communication, have not only successfully foisted this lie upon mankind and then exacerbated it by programming successive generations of people to accept it as the gospel truth but have now managed to actually elevate it to the apex of juridical absurdity through the manufacture of actual legislation in certain countries that make it ILLEGAL to question what is undoubtedly, as researcher Arthur R. Butz clearly proved back in 1976, the greatest hoax of the 20th century?
Of course I know why you made that comment just as I know why the Zionist Jews and the state of Israel have been slaughtering Palestinians and stealing their land for over a century. It is, as the Jews so often have stated in the past with respect to their 6 Million myth, ‘manifestly obvious’ that your intent is to discourage others from any association with those who, like myself, refuse to accept the unacceptable and fraudulent premise of the 6 Million and thus segregate and isolate our thoughts and ideas and opinions and years of intensive research so that no one will be tempted to investigate further what I or numerous others have to say about any of the related problems that political Zionism has created throughout the 20th century and which now, are coming to a head, in the early beginnings of the 21st.
Here is your modus operandi and the scenario that you would have others believe:
The primary purpose of labelling a person an ‘anti-Semite’ or a ‘Holocaust denier’ or a ‘hate monger’ or any number of other similar epithets is, pure and simple, outright vilification. In other words if you can first create labels like those just identified and then instil their circumscribed and false meanings in the minds of the general public through mass programming (via the mainstream media which the Jews control), then once this is established it precludes having to establish any further solid proof to support whatever allegations you may wish to make about a person, group, organization or even government for that matter, which you intend to destroy by first defaming them in order to discredit either their character and integrity or their work (i.e. opposing views).
To return to your original remark let us see how this program of vilification would work should it actually be followed through.
I have lived in Cariboo region of British Columbia, Canada since 1970 which amounts to forty-four years (with some brief absences). From 1975 on I have lived here steadily working and raising a family and contributing to the local community in a number of ways.
The Quesnel area has a overall population of about 30,000 people which is not a large number to get to know or become known to over the span of nearly half a century. Because of my propensity for writing and my interest in politics and history I have been a regular contributor to Quesnel’s community newspaper, the Quesnel Cariboo Observer where, according to statistics, I earned a reputation for having contributed more ‘Letters to the Editor’ to that publication than anyone else in its 106 year history of publishing. As well I have been a paid columnist for the same publication.
My civil commitments to the local region have also been substantial and fulfilling with years of community service in my own local community of Cottonwood which lies approximately 20 miles east of the city of Quesnel. I’ve worked in a number of different professions ranging from school teaching to that of a Park Ranger and Supervisor to being a log builder, the owner of a registered carpentry business as well as owning and running a registered publishing business known as The Radical Press along with placer mining and being the Secretary of the Cariboo Mining Association.
On top of these activities I’ve been actively participating in local politics at the regional, municipal and provincial levels of government having at different times ran for the position of Councillor for the city of Quesnel as well as for the provincial MLA’s position for the Cariboo North electoral district.
In other words I haven’t been sitting idle over the past forty years plus. It is this legacy of community contributions and effort that you are attempting to destroy by your calculated and malicious attempt to discredit my life’s work using worn-out tactics of slander and libel and defamation, all of which are meant to malign my character and denigrate all of my efforts over the past four decades.
But that’s not the worst of it. You would have your mean-spirited accusations and spiteful assertions carry over to all those with whom I’ve established relations with throughout my lifetime here in the Cariboo. In other words all of my friends and associates and those within my community who I’ve had social or business dealings with for decades are all to suddenly void their association with me because now I am a ‘Holocaust denier’ and no longer the person I’ve been all my life. Are you not capable of intellectually grasping the enormity of what you are attempting to do via your spurious, and, yes, hateful slander?
You mentioned Councillor Sushil Thapar in your comment but you have failed to mention the rest of the many councillors and mayors of the city of Quesnel who I have known and associated with and befriended over the past forty-four years. Are they also expected to treat me as if I were suddenly a pariah and a leper because someone of your mental measure has inferred that I am a ‘Holocaust denier’?
Why it wasn’t that long ago that I was speaking with one of the former mayors of Quesnel and he remarked to me, upon hearing that I had been charged with a ‘hate crime’, ‘Why Arthur how can this be? I’ve always known you to be a ‘peace and love’ sorta guy, one of the old Hippies who’s always strived to bring social justice and brotherhood and sisterhood and environmental sanity back to the world.’ Were he and all the other public figures who I know to take your ill-intentioned and evil advice they would all, needs be, have to see me in a totally different light and accept that they had been wrong about me all their lives and that in reality I’m just a no-good, worthless, hate-mongering, Jew-hating anti-Semite and, horror of horrors, a ‘Holocaust denier’!
And that, Nick Inglis, is the long and the short of your intentions and your sleazy tactics. Rather than have to defend your libellous accusations made against my person by offering up substantial evidence to prove what you are alleging is verifiable truth it’s much easier to merely resort to the Zionist Jew’s deceptive deck of shitty smear cards in the vain hope that whatever ones you pull out will somehow stick to me and save you having to actually offer credible sources to support your surreptitiously motivated intentions.
Like I mentioned earlier in this article the definitive proof that the so-called 6 Million Jewish Holocaust is nothing more than a fabricated fraud is all contained in Arthur R. Butz’s book, The Hoax of the Twentieth Century. Once again I humbly suggest to you and all the rest of the truth-deniers and holocaust believers in the world that you obtain a copy of this book and read it carefully. Having done that and you are still convinced that you can disprove what Mr. Butz has shown to be the truth regarding this deception then please share your findings with the rest of the truth seekers of the world who have already determined the veracity of this indisputable document.
In Peace and Justice for All,
I remain,
Arthur Topham

{ Add a Comment }

Curt Maynard’s blog The Politically Correct Apostate shut down hours after posting anti-Zionist article

[Editor’s Note: This article by Curt Maynard is obviously of vital importance to the exposure of the Zionist agenda for global control and internet censorship (for the goyim and the ‘self-hating’ Jews); that is why it appeared only for a few hours in Cyberia before the Zionists shot down the blogsite.
In the interests of freedom of thought and expression I am posting it here and hopefully these same control freaks won’t be able to do likewise with me!
It ought to be noted that when the term ‘Jews’ is used it does not refer to all the Jewish people but only to those who support and endorse and work to sustain the Zionist agenda for global hegemony. If one is so naive as to think that criticism of Zionist Jew policies is strictly limited to non-Jews they might take a moment and view the extensive website set up by the Zionist hate mongers that heaps mounds of verbal abuse, calumny and blatant levels of hatred toward the thousands of honest and honourable and moral Jews who have spoken out against the racist, supremacist policies of the Israeli government and the Zionists in general.
In an email that I received from Dr. Henry Makow on this subject he wrote: ‘Here is a list of 100’s of Jews who are condemned by a fanatical Zionist group as ‘self hating dirt.’ I am on the list.
This site can be viewed at: http://www.masada2000.org/list-A.htmlÂÂ
Please read and pass this article on. If you can’t pass it on then save it to one of your files for future reference just in case the worse case scenario I spoke of above actually occurs.]

From: curt womak
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 07:22:40 -0800 (PST)
To: The Radical Press
Arthur,
The politically correct apostate [at wordpress] has once again been shut down, this time within a couple hours of posting the article ‘It’s the Jews Stupid .’
——-
Preface to ‘It’s the Jews Stupid’ by Curt Maynard
Several years ago I was attending a University in the Northwest. While I was doing so I received several of Edgar Steeles Conspiracy pen pal missives. I still read them, I just go to his website at http://www.conspiracypenpal.com rather than receive them as an email. In any case, during that time I ‘acquired, one of Mr. Steeles better known sayings and kind of ‘adopted, it as my own. My essay, ‘Its the Jews Stupid, was not as original as I thought when I wrote it. Mr. Steele wrote an excellent essay several years ago with the same title, and it seems that I must have liked it so much that I began to use the phrase, ‘Its the Jews Stupid, and embraced it as my own. In any case, this statement, which will precede my essay on my blog site from this moment on is my attempt to remedy this usurpation of his prose/ideas and to give him the attribution he deserves. Mr. Steele was very kind about all this, I wrote him and he asked if I was the one that had written an essay with the same title as his. I realized at that point what must have happened, i.e. I read his essay in 2004 and accidentally appropriated his title. I apologized and he graciously accepted my apology. I highly recommend his essay ‘Its the Jews Stupid, it is an excellent expose as to how our friends the Jews conduct themselves in this day and age and how we Goyim allow them to get away with their bad behavior.
Curt Maynard
————
Its The Jews Stupid
By Curt Maynard
[email protected]
I have long thought about writing this article but hesitated because I didnt want the reader to conclude that I believed that all Jews are complicit in what amounts to a vast conspiracy to undermine western civilization and establish a Talmudic centered one world government. However, times have changed, and I feel obligated to write this and post it on the last bastion of freedom of speech, the Internet – before even that, in its present form is made unavailable to mankind.
Of course all Jews arent engaged in this nefarious plan, but unfortunately most of them will come to the aid of those who are. There are some exceptions, on occasion one will criticize another, but as a rule, those who are in a position to publicly denounce one of their own are still pro-Israel/pro-Zionist in orientation. A Jewish conservative talk show host named Michael Savage recently condemned George Soros, a multinational Jewish Supremacist, for engaging in the kind of activities that according to Savage led to the holocaust more than sixty years ago. In a sense Savage is right, Soros is exactly the kind of Jew that inspired Germans to wake up and democratically elect Adolf Hitler in 1933, the financial shenanigans Soros engages in today, are pretty much the same thing German Jews were engaged in prior to the Second World War. Unfortunately, Savage cant be looked at as a role model for Jews either; hes a hard core Zionist and an Israeli apologist, blindly towing the line for this little provocateur no matter what it does or whom it does it to
This little spat between Soros and Savage illustrates an important point and one I intend to thoroughly expand on in the next few pages. Savage is allegedly a ‘right wing Jew and Soros is allegedly a leftist, both are Jewish, both have a voice, both have a platform, Savages is talk radio and Soros speaks through various organizations, like http://www.moveon.com and whatever else his money and influence buys. You wont hear any non-Jewish critics of Israel on the radio, television or on Moveon.com – they have no voice, no platform, not in the mainstream media anyway. The networks have gotten to the point where when Israel and/or Middle Eastern affairs are discussed; the experts and analysts are introduced, and they may as well be referred to as Jew #1, Jew #2 and Jew #3. I cant tell you how sick it makes me when Fox News, the allegedly ‘fair and balanced, network introduces Charles Krauthammer and William Crystal to their viewers as if either could possibly offer an unbiased opinion when it comes to Israel and/or organized Jewry, both are in every sense of the word Jewish Supremacists.
Jews are today so over represented, so disproportionately prevalent, in just about every facet of American life, despite composing a very small numerical percentage of our population that I no longer believe, as I once did, that most people arent aware of it. Sure there are a few, busily engaged in acquiring as much money as possible, or watching American Idol, or engrossed in video games and MTV, that they arent fully awake, but in my opinion, for the most part anyway, those that deny the reach and omnipresence of Jewish influence in America today are either ignorant, delusional and/or complicit.
One recent phenomenon that finally encouraged me to write, ‘Its the Jews Stupid, is this incredible short sighted and moronic tendency to compare George Bush to Adolph Hitler, or to bring up Georges grandfathers alleged relationship with the Nazis and to somehow suggest that this alleged relationship proves Bush is himself is a Nazi. This ridiculous theory is advanced by the same folks that suppress the abundance of evidence implicating the Israelis and a complicit and predominantly Jewish media in what happened in NYC and at the Pentagon on 9-11, people like Greg Szymanski, who by the way claims to live in a very small Idaho community known as Spirit Lake, but like his theories, this too is a lie, my mother lives in Spirit lake; and Szymanski doesnt. Szymanski also loves to implicate a so called ‘Black Pope, in every nefarious incident that has occurred over the last several decades; I cant tell you who or exactly what this ‘Black Pope, is, as I dont bother to read Szymanskis crap, hes a moron and a crude propagandist, who would like to misdirect his readers attention to ludicrous ideas like Bush is a Nazi and/or a servant of this nebulous Black Pope. I have written Szymanski several times and pointed out to him that ‘its the Jews stupid, but he refuses to respond to my missives, preferring instead to continue his pointless and misleading rants. I have since concluded that Szymanski isnt just a fool, hes a hired gun, and agent provocateur, granted, not a very good one, but one nevertheless.
So, some of you might ask, ‘well how exactly do you know Bush is not a Nazi. For anyone with the shallowest understanding of history as it relates to the Second World War, this isnt much of a surprise, sadly most Americans are more attuned to their feelings of self worth than they are history in general, so they may be more susceptible to believing concepts that are so erroneous that those with a rudimentary knowledge just disregard out of hand. Hitler sought to exclude Jews from German life, especially their representation in government, academics and the German media, which was composed of newspapers, news magazines and radio in those days – their was no television, at least not available to the public – so this wasnt an issue. George Bush has appointed Jews to some of the most sensitive positions in the American government, Michael Chertoff is the Director of Homeland Security, a position that places him in a position to do pretty much as he likes with our National Security apparatus, Chertoff is an ethnic Jew and a dual citizen of the state of Israel. Hitler wouldnt have considered appointing a Jew to such a post period – it wouldnt have happened, primarily because the German people, the Nazi Party and Adolph Hitler were entirely cognizant of the fact that German Jewry had collectively done their best to destroy the German economy and German nation after the First World War. Does this mean that every German Jew participated in this treasonous pursuit, that every German Jew became wealthy at the expense of their non-Jewish German neighbors? Of course not, but like today in America, most Jews actively participated in covering up the crimes of their criminal co-religionists, which makes them complicit to a certain extent. One can see the same phenomenon at work today in America, anytime anyone mentions that Jews are disproportionately represented in the United States government, in the American media, in academics, in the medical profession, in banking, which in fact they are, they are met with a coordinated assault by an incredible number of Jews, most of whom arent guilty of committing any actual crimes, who seek to silence them with various labels, i.e. anti-Semite, bigot, racist, etc… One hears many excuses for this cohesive support, which only enables the criminals, fear of anti-Semitism, and/or fear of the next pogrom or holocaust. Unfortunately for collective Jewry, this excuse doesnt wash – what they are doing, and what the Germans knew they were collectively doing in 1933, and what Americans are slowly becoming aware of now, is aiding and abetting their co-religionists to commit crimes that are tantamount to treason. In 1933 the German nation democratically elected a leader that promised them he wouldnt allow this absolute and empirical reality to continue. George Bush on the other hand chose a Jew named Bernenke to replace another Jew named Alan Greenspan as the head of the Federal Reserve, a position that is without question perhaps one of the most powerful and influential positions in government today. In the words of Joseph Goebbels if Hitler and his Nazis were to have done something like that after the German people had suffered through a decade of hyperinflation, and the deprivation so associated, the German people would have ‘boxed their ears.[1]
The fact is, George Bush is not a Nazi, he is not in the least sympathetic with Nationalism, let alone National Socialism; he is without a doubt the most Philo-Semitic President that has ever sat in the Oval Office period. Adolph Hitler sought to ostracize Jewish troublemakers; Bush seeks to make them his most influential foreign and domestic policy advisors. As Bush himself would say, ‘make no mistake, our commander and chief is not critical of Israel and/or the disproportionate amount of influence Jews in the United States wield; he is their friend, their ally, and in the end, more concerned about their interests than he is in the interests of his own nation. There are those that would seek to convince you and I that Bush is a ‘Christian fundamentalist, and it is for this reason that he supports Israel and Jews with such vigor, but this too is a chimera, Bush is an opportunist, not an ideologue, he has no loyalty to anything beyond himself and his own business interests.
Goebbels was somewhat of a prophet pariah, he understood organized Jewry like few Americans do today, he understood that their collective calls of anti-Semitism directed at the Nazi leadership and indeed the German people themselves was a technique they had successfully used, even perfected, in order to advance their interests while at the same time suppressing any dissent from the gentile majority. We see this same technique at work today, all around the world, anytime anyone honestly divulges the actions of a Jew in some crime; they are immediately smeared with the label of ‘anti-Semitism. This is not a recent phenomenon, it has nothing to do with Zionism, as Noam Chomsky might suggest, it is an ageless technique developed by Jewry over an extended period of time, as evidenced by one entry Goebbels made in his diary during the Second World War, more than sixty years ago:
‘The Jews in England now demand laws to protect them from anti-Semitism. We know these tactics from our own past when we were struggling for power. I didn’t help much. We were always able to find loopholes in the law. Besides anti-Semitism cannot be eradicated by law once it has taken root with the people. A law against hating Jews is usually the beginning of the end for the Jews’.[2]
Goebbels also noted in his diary an inevitability that will catch up with Jewry once again, an inevitability that has caught up with them in the past – one they cannot seem to escape entirely, and one that should motivate any sane Jew to seriously reconsider their relationship with the so called Jewish state of Israel and its blatant disregard for what the majority of the people in the world want, and that is to live free of the Jewish yoke, whether that yoke be of an economic nature, and/or one of a socio-political-cultural character. In the following entry Goebbels notes something that is becoming evident today – many Jews are becoming aware of the fact that non-Jews are beginning to scrutinize some uncomfortable facts that implicate Jews as being behind a great deal of the issues that most effect them – this is getting harder to cover up, people are beginning to notice that Jews are disproportionately represented in the areas of life that the non-Jewish majority is most concerned with, and that is the degeneracy of western culture, the degeneracy of American culture, the degradation of Christian values, the collapse of the American educational system and the rape of our economy. In their haste to cover up their involvement in these areas, Jews are exposing themselves as they never have before, and because of this Americans now know that Jews dominate Hollywood, the media in all its facets, our economy, our judicial process and in many respects our very government. Once again, this is nothing new, Jews had attempted the very same thing in Germany after the First World War and in France, and in Poland, and in Spain – in fact ethnic Jews have been tossed out of more countries, not for their faith as they today allege, but because of their collective behavior, than any other ethnic group in history. Despite what your history professor will tell you about their ejection from Spain under Ferdinand and Isabella, it had nothing to do with the fact that they werent Catholic and everything to do with their behavior – they intentionally enslaved the Spanish people under their usurious yolk, they absolutely, without any doubt whatsoever ushered in the Moorish invaders from Africa and as a result they unquestionably committed treason, and the Spanish people knew it. It is for these reasons and no others that the Jews were ejected from Spain and you can bet there wasnt a moist eye to be found among the Spanish victims. Bearing this in mind, carefully consider the words of Joseph Goebbels:
‘The Jews aren’t always so clever as they would like themselves to believe. Whenever they are in danger they prove to be the stupidest devils.’[3]
Goebbels was of course correct, contemporaneously and in a modern sense as well, organized Jewry has in fact become desperate, they exposed themselves completely on 9-11, and if the media were in other hands, their Fifth Column would long ago have been neutralized and the war on terror ended. If it were not for the fact that the entire media apparatus was kosher, Americans would know that 150 Israelis were arrested in the United States following 9-11 for espionage and then quietly deported without informing the American public by the Jew and dual Israeli citizen Michael Chertoff, who was at that time Assistant Attorney General under the flunky John Ashcroft. If it werent for the fact that the media is in a virtual and very Jewish stranglehold, Americans would know that five Israelis were arrested on 9-11 after they were witnessed filming the impacts of the airliners into the World Trade Centers while laughing, joking and clapping one another on the backs in a congratulatory manner. These Israeli Jews were also deported back to Israel without informing the American people that they had even been arrested, let alone what their behavior was purported to have been. If it werent for the complicit media and government, not to mention the corrupt judicial system, Americans would be familiar with the empirical fact that on January 2, 2004 an Israeli Jew named Asher Karni was arrested for having sold [past tense] more than sixty nuclear weapon detonators to Pakistan, the worlds most unstable Islamic Republic and a country in which ‘Osama, as in Osama Bin Laden, is the most popular name for a male child. If the American media wasnt under the direct control of Jews, the American people would know that an American Jew named Yehuda Abraham was arrested in 2003 for conspiring to sell Russian made surface to air missiles to undercover FBI agents posing as Al Qaeda operatives with the understanding that these missiles would be used on American civilian airliners in the continental United States.
The fact is, we dont know whether the above named Jews are in fact Zionists, or even sympathetic with the Zionist cause, but we do know they are ethnic Jews and we know their names, identities, and actions are being hidden from the people of the United States, with the express intent of deceiving Americans into believing that Israel is their ally.
Its the Jews stupid!
It doesnt matter whether Jews appear to be leftists like Alan Dershowitz or Noam Chomsky, or whether they appear to be ‘right wingers, like former leftist David Horowitz, or Michael Savage, or Norman Podheretz, William Krystal or Charles Krauthammer, they inevitably are intent on advancing what cannot be considered anything other than Jewish interests. Concepts like liberalism and conservatism are nothing more than angles to them to be manipulated and mastered for the advancement of Jewish interests as a collective whole. A perfect example of this incestuous predilection is how Jews on both the right and left look upon the criminal Oligarchs of Russia and their criminal acquisition of Russias entire infrastructure in the 1990s for pennies on the dollar. The Russian people led by their President, Vladimir Putin, have recently indicted several Jewish Oligarchs for this monumental theft, most of the indicted have escaped to refuse in Israel and/or Britain, nonetheless their assets in Russia have been appropriated, rightfully it might be added, and their ill acquired fortunes have suffered as a result. So what does organized Jewry do? They pull every string they can, they exert their unbelievable collective influence upon various members of Congress in an effort to get them to condemn the Russian government as anti-democratic, they compel President Bush to support the condemnations, they lobby anyone and everyone they can in an effort to enable these Jewish thieves to retain their stolen monies and property. You wont see any articles written by Jews condemning the Oligarchs for stealing billions from the Russian people, but youll see plenty of articles written by Jews condemning Putin and the Russian people for protesting the fact that they have been ripped off. We dont really know if these Oligarchs are Zionists and/or sympathetic to the Zionist cause. We do however know that they are ethnic Jews and that they quickly became Capitalists, despite having lived in a communist country for the majority of their lives, after the collapse of the USSR. Fortunately we know today that the Oligarchs of Russia were financed by ethnic Jews in America, and that their primary apologists today are the very same American Jews – so once again, despite the smoke and mirrors of the all too predictable boogeyman of Zionism, ‘its the Jews stupid, not their latest ‘ism.
Lenard Lieberman,[4] Vice President of Clear Channel Communications, one of the largest if not the largest corporate owners of radio stations across the United States, launched a billboard advertisement campaign in California a year or so ago, which claimed that Los Angeles was in Mexico, not California. The reaction was predictable, millions of Americans reacted negatively to the billboards, immediately demanding that they be taken down, which predictably led to catcalls of racism, and then the media just as predictably brought forward all kinds of pro-Mexican radicals that claimed California was part of Mexico and those that disputed this claim were racists.
Hispanic front men for Lieberman and spokespeople for Clear Channel insisted that only ‘racists wanted the signs taken down and stated against all opposition that the signs would remain up and for about a week they did. Initially the reactionary American population blamed Mexicans and Hispanics, it was only after an extensive Internet investigation that the facts came out a Jewish vice president of Clear Channel named Lenard Lieberman was the brains behind the advertising campaign and had ordered the signs erected. Once this information was posted on the Internet, the signs immediately came down, overnight in fact. The media dropped the entire matter and not another word about the billboards has since been heard on American airwaves. Lieberman probably isnt a ‘leftist radical, considering that hes the vice president of a large American Capitalist corporation, we dont know whether or not hes a Zionist, but we know hes a Jew, and we can see by his surreptitious behavior that he was far more interested in fomenting division than he was in creating unity. The fact is, organized Jewry is the main impetus behind both legal and illegal immigration into western nations – those that dispute this absolute fact are once again, either, stupid, delusional, and/or complicit. Jews love to play all sides, as a matter a fact they are masters at it, by doing so they hope to control the agendas of any organizations that might one day challenge the established kosher order. Remember Cindy Sheehan? Ms. Sheehan is essentially a leftist who got it right when she sent a letter to a major news network stating that her son joined the Army to protect the United States of America, not Israel, her fame grew exponentially just preceding that letter and in its immediate aftermath – she showed up at Bushs ranch in Texas demanding to see the traitor, all of the networks provided coverage, but someone got to Cindy and convinced her to retract her statement concerning Israel, and as a result she has been marginalized since. Sure the Jewish media throws her a bone every now and again, but shell never recover the momentum she had in the summer off 2005, she has since been relegated to speaking at ‘unity, type churches, where the Jews can keep their eyes on her at all times.
The entire immigration fiasco in America today is completely dominated by ethnic Jews, they ensure that no restrictive legislation is made into law and when individuals like the Minutemen form into groups and become a little too popular they start cranking out the media propaganda and the all to common denunciations of bigotry, and/or they get their front men, people like George Bush, to accuse the Minutemen of vigilantism. Fortunately few Americans take that fool seriously any longer – they have basically pegged him for what he is, a damnable traitor. So how do the Jews accomplish all this? Consider the following:
The Jewish-Latino relationship is now viewed as an absolute priority for our [Jewish] community, said American Jewish Committee Washington, DC, area director David Bernstein. ‘We see them [Hispanics] as increasingly active politically and more and more willing to work with coalition partners in achieving our collective goals. The phenomenon has been emerging in the last five to ten years. Groups such as the American Jewish Committee and the Jewish Community Council have been forming coalitions with organizations such as the National Council of La Raza and the League of United Latin American Citizens.[5]
No doubt organized Jewry would love to cultivate this relationship, it would be good for Jews albeit devastating for Hispanics. After nearly eighty years of exploitation, the black community has finally managed to semi-extricate itself from the parasitic grip of organized Jewry. If in fact this relationship between Hispanic and Jewish groups develops further there is no doubt whatsoever that the relatively harmonious relationship between Hispanics and whites enjoyed today will end and become just like the seething, resentful, and negative relationship between the American white and black communities. The black community has been so exploited by Jewry over the last eighty years that they may be beyond recovery as a viable group in the United States. This isnt to say that Jews have just focused on African Americans, oh no, they have victimized and stigmatized every black man and woman, and they have done so by convincing these blacks that the Jew is their only ally and friend, they then turn around and use the black race as a scapegoat for Jewish crimes – just as they have successfully done post Katrina, when the heat was on the Israelis and the Jewish media in regards to the Iraq War, along came Hurricane Katrina, and the displacement of a group of blacks so degenerate and handicapped by being third and fourth generation welfare recipients, that no white person in their right mind would want them as neighbors, yet the Jews came out in force, doing their best to relocate these blacks in the most unlikely of white regions, i.e. Utah, that for months white America had its mind on little else other than the depravity and ignorance of many of these near savages from New Orleans and ways in which to keep them out of their neighborhoods. Result – few were focused on what Israel was doing in Palestine or what was happening in Iraq and Iran.
So how do the Jews exploit their relationship with minorities?
David Horowitz was once a fairly well known Jewish leftist in the 1960s and 1970s. He has since ‘converted, to neo-conservatism, which isnt that much of an ideological leap believe it or not, the neo-cons are really nothing more than left leaning Trotskyites with an alleged ‘right wing, foreign policy outlook, which is just another way of saying they support the state of Israel even at the expense of their host country the United States of America. In any case, Horowitz wrote an autobiography a few years ago, in it he tried to explain to his former leftist oriented readers how he came to reject the socialism he once advocated and instead embraced the neo-con [read Jewish Supremacist] agenda. His autobiography is entitled Radical Son, it isnt very good, but fortunately Horowitz admitted to a few things that make writing this paper much easier. Consider the following passage and then bear in mind that organized Jewry has denied in leading role in directing the agenda of radical black organizations.
Talking to Huey [Huey Newton – a well known black radical] as a kind of equal…. emboldened me to raise yet another difficult issue. A strain of anti-Semitism had developed in the Party [The Black panther party] during the years he [Newton] was in prison. Of course, the Panthers were not alone among black radicals in their attacks on Jews. In 1966, Stokely Carmichael and the leaders of the SNCC had expelled whites from the civil rights organization, accusing them of being a fifth column inside the movement. Since Jews were a near majority of the whites in these organizations, and had played a strategic role in organizing and funding the struggle, it was clear to everyone that they were the primary target of the assault. This was underscored by the support that Carmichael and the black left gave to the Arab states during their 1967 attack on Israel.[6]
‘Unfortunately most people arent aware of the fact that Israel preemptively attacked the Arab states on June 5, 1967, not the other way around. This is what I would refer to as ‘kosher revisionism, and it is quite common in the world today, as a matter a fact, its the norm. Historical revisionism has developed a bad name primarily because kosher revisionism rules the airwaves, radio and television; ethnic Jews have a near monopoly on the media in all its forms, and for that reason, lies like Horowitzs go unnoticed by most people. Horowitz predictably sets up his ‘admission, i.e. that Jews were disproportionately represented in the black civil rights movement by first prostrating himself in such a way as to fool the reader into believing that he, Horowitz, was only able to influence Newton, because Newton, the black man in the relationship, felt that Horowitz was an equal. Many people will laugh at the very idea that a Jew would consider any black to be an equal – as a rule, Jews loathe blacks more than they do whites, but they find that exploiting blacks is advantageous to the advancement of their agenda, and it is for this reason, and no other, that they associate with blacks.[7]
Later in his autobiography, Horowitz again reinforces the above lie by reiterating it, but in a slightly different manner, but doing so with the same goal in mind, to convince his reader of a lie, i.e. that the Arabs attacked the Israelis in 1967 and to simultaneously smear Arab/Muslims in general:
I began to review events of the past to which I had paid little attention before, like the expulsion of the Jews from the civil rights movement in 1966. Jews had funded the movement, devised its legal strategies, and provided support for its efforts in the media and in the universities – and wherever else they had power. More than half the freedom riders who had gone to the southern states were Jews, although Jews constituted only 3% of the population. It was an unprecedented show of solidarity from one people to another. Jews had put their resources and lives on the line to support the black struggle for civil rights, and indeed two of their sons – Schwerner and Goodman – had been murdered for their efforts. But even while these tragic events were still fresh, the black leaders of the movement had unceremoniously expelled the Jews from their ranks. When Israel was attacked in 1967 by a coalition of Arab states calling for its annihilation, the same black leaders threw their support to the Arab aggressors, denouncing Zionism as racism.[8]
Once again, the Israelis preemptively attacked the Arabs on June 5, 1967, not the other way around, Horowitz isnt confused, he knows this, but he is compelled to lie in order to fabricate history – a most common Jewish trait and one they have only been able to get away with because of their strategic stranglehold on the media and the publishing industry.
The fact is, Zionism is racist, it is inherently racist, far more so than anything of the old Jim Crow variety. Judaism itself is a racist religion, its obvious enough, the entire foundation of Judaism rests on the idea that Jews are a ‘chosen people, and the term ‘people connotes race and ‘chosen, connotes exclusivity – put the two together and you inevitably get ‘racism. A no-brainer really but an idea that Jews have successfully kept hidden from the Goyim cattle.
The fact is, the Jews have exploited blacks going all the way back to the early 20th century, they founded, developed and financed the NAACP, a fact that history and political science professors are still too scared to admit openly, but a fact nonetheless.
At this point, let us get serious. Let us reject, at least momentarily, the knee-jerk reaction to dismiss what is written below based upon our emotional response to it. Let us consider carefully the facts, let us then consider what they might mean, and in the end, let us consider what the ultimate ramifications of these facts may be in our not too distant future. When I ask for instance, what group, more so than any other distinguishable group, was responsible for the Bolshevik Revolution, and I then answer that question by saying, ‘its the Jews stupid, dont reject it as an arbitrary response; it isnt arbitrary, its an empirical fact, and one that can be easily proven if the reader chooses to cast aside his or her emotional response and to engage in a few hours of research.
What distinct group has been ejected from more counties over the last two millennia than any other group? Its the Jews stupid.
What distinct group has led more radical subversive movements within their host nations than any other distinguishable group? Its the Jews stupid.
What group has consistently avoided military service, especially in the front lines, than any other group? Its the Jews stupid.[9]
What group more so than any other has always had its patriotism questioned? Its the Jews stupid.
What specific ethnic/religious group more so than any other has consistently sought to ensnare and then exploit native populations under the yolk of usury? Its the Jews stupid.
What ethnic/religious group dominates international finance? Its the Jews stupid.
What ethnic group dominates the media in Europe and North America? Its the Jews stupid.
What ethnic group dominates Hollywood? Its the Jews stupid.[10]
What ethnic group has done more to subvert true scientific inquiry in the sciences than any other – imbedding themselves in the disciplines of psychology, sociology and anthropology – and doing so in such a way as to hijack them and completely and totally politicize them? Its the Jews stupid.[11]
What ethnic group gave us ‘multiculturalism, and followed that up with an indoctrination program that reinforced this divisive farce by reaching right into our job place, homes and schools via compulsory ‘diversity and ‘tolerance, training programs and presentations? Its the Jews stupid.[12]
Who brought us ‘Judeo-Christianity, a concept that erroneously amalgamates two distinctly different and diametrically opposed religious and cultural views? Its the Jews stupid.[13]
What ethnic group has done more than any other to identify itself as the only real victims of Nazi Germany and the Second World War? Its the Jews stupid.
What ethnic group has perpetrated one of the greatest frauds on mankind in the form of the so-called ‘holocaust? Its the Jews stupid! [This is an important point – please see associated footnote][14]
What ethnic group dominates the Russian mafia? Its the Jews stupid.
What ethnic group dominates the pornography industry? Its the Jews stupid.
What ethnic group is more responsible than any other for the ongoing sex slave trade? Its the Jews stupid.
Members of what ethnic group intentionally attacked an American ship in 1967 named the USS Liberty, in what amounted to an act of war against the United States of America and then used their co-ethnics in the United States to cover that fact up? Its the Jews stupid.
Members of what ethnic group sought to bomb American assets in Cairo Egypt in the 1950s and blame it on the Arabs in an attempt to frame them and convince Americans to financially and militarily support the Zionist state? Its the Jews stupid.[15]
What group more than any other has sought to undermine Christian values and western civilization in an effort to divide and conquer? Its the Jews stupid.
What ethnic group was overly represented in the junk bond scandals of the 1980s? Its the Jews stupid.[16]
Members of what ethnic group were deeply involved in the Enron scandal but were able to utilize the Jewish medias influence and access to the American mind in such a way as to nearly eliminate their role? Its the Jews stupid.[17]
This list could go on and on, it would require a tomb the size of Moby Dick to encompass the many crimes ethnic Jews have committed against Gentiles just in the last decade. The point of writing this isnt to convince readers that every Jew is deeply entwined in a plot to subvert Gentile society, but that Judaism is not a peaceful religion that seeks to coexist in harmony with non-Jews, the fact is Judaism is first and foremost a ‘supremacist religion that advocates the dominance of non-Jews.
Unless Gentiles become aware of the fact that Zionism is nothing but Judaisms latest ‘ism, preceded in the past by many others, i.e. feminism, socialism, communism, and that these ‘isms are nothing more than tactics used in a grand strategy to weaken our will and western civilization itself, well never get to the heart of the problem at hand, well continue to fight wars for the Jews, to kill for the Jews, to arrest and incarcerate people for the Jews, to suppress the right to free expression for the Jews, etc… etc… ad infinitum. The time to liberate ourselves is now.
———-
FOOTNOTES:
[1] Goebbel’s Diaries. Louis Lochner [1948] Pg 336
[2] Goebbel’s Diaries. Louis Lochner [1948] Pg 336.
[3] Goebbel’s Diaries. Louis Lochner. [1948] Pg 183.
[4] This author has found this individuals name to be spelled in a variety of ways, probably in an attempt to throw off investigation. These include Leonard Liebermann, Lenard Leibermann, Lenard Lieberman, Leonard Lieberman.
[5] http://www.jewishworldreview.com/0800/latinos.jews.html
[6] Pg. 227.
[7] Maynard, Curt. ‘David Horowitz, ‘Jewish Supremacism and the Mechanics of How Jews Exploit Blacks. http://www.pcapostate.blogspot.com/
[8] Horowitz, David. Radical Son. Pg. 275-276.
[9] An excellent book about the reality of so called Jewish patriotism and military service is War, Money and American Memory: Myths of Virtue, Valor and Patriotism, by Richard Earley, available on http://www.Amazon.com .
[10] Good books on this subject, Hollywood Babylon and another book entitled An Empire of their Own: How the Jews Invented Hollywood, by a Jew named Neal Gabler.
[11] Excellent examples of this undeniable fact can be found in the trilogy written by evolutionary psychology professor Kevin MacDonald, Separation and its Discontents, Culture of Critique A People That Shall Dwell Alone.
[12] Make no mistake – the entire Multiculturalism farce is as kosher as Gefilte fish on unleavened crackers – according to the Jewish owned Newsweek, the ‘primer, for ‘multiculturalism, itself can be traced to the Jewess Paula Rothenberg and her ‘social scientific monstrosity entitled Racism and Sexism: An Integrated Study.
[13] This author has not been able to locate any written or recorded sources utilizing the term ‘Judeo-Christianity, prior to 1940 – the term itself seems to be a modern invention and one forced on Christians via the media and Jewish influence. Abe Foxman, Director of the Anti-Defamation League, a Jewish Supremacist organization, reinforces this fact in his propaganda laced diatribe Never Again, when he reveals on page 146 that he got Jerry Falwell, a well known Christian evangelist to agree to use the term ‘Judeo-Christian, rather than the exclusive ‘Christian, when referring to the foundation of the United States of America, i.e. This is a Christian Nation.
[14] In the last several years many prominent historical revisionists [holocaust deniers to the Jews – historians by any other name] have been illegally arrested and deported; victims of so called ‘renditions, and imprisoned in three alleged ‘modern democratic nations, Canada, Germany and Austria. The American public is unaware of this incredible injustice because the Jewish media has embraced a news black out when it comes to these courageous individuals. Now I ask the reader in all seriousness, considering everything happening in the world today, why would a so-called modern democratic nation imprison people for questioning certain aspects of the holocaust? We dont imprison people for claiming theyve been abducted by aliens, for stating that the Pope and Opus Dei are behind all the evils in the world, for questioning the veracity of past American Presidents, etc… why are we throwing people that question certain aspects of history as it relates to Jews into prison? Answer: Its the Jews stupid – The story that we have been thoroughly indoctrinated to believe and to accept on faith with religious fervor is mostly a lie. The Jews and the media would have you believe that so called holocaust deniers deny that the Germans persecuted Jews and/or that the Germans never imprisoned Jews in concentration camps. Surprise, there isnt a single revisionist that denies these facts – they do however question the near holy number of 6 million and the idea that the Germans systematically gassed Jews in ‘gas chambers, in Poland during the Second World War. Did you know that for 45 years a commemorative plaque sat at Auschwitz claiming that 4 millions Jews had died in the camp and that this plaque was changed with absolutely no fanfare in 1990 to another plaque that claims only 1.5 million? FACT: If it hadnt been for the hard work and dedication of historical revisionists, people like Ernst Zundel, Germar Rudolf, David Irving, Siegfried Verbeke, Manfred Roeder, Bradley Smith, Fred Leuchter and many, many others, that plaque would never have been changed. In the end, only a fool wouldnt consider the likelihood that the real reason these historians have been jailed is because they have been on the right track all along and there are people out there, predominantly Jews, that do not want others to know what these individuals have to say.
[15] See information on the Lavon Affair – do a google search, there is a great deal of info on this crime, the Israelis essentially admit what they did, its not a state secret.
[16] Read about Michael Milken and Ivan Boesky, both Jews, and both Junk Bond Kings.
[17] The primary witness to turn states evidence against Ken Lay and Jeffrey Skilling was the Jew Andy Fastow who worked closely with the largest holders of Enron stock, the Jewish Belfer family. For more information on these facts, see Michael Collins Pipers excellent book, The New Jerusalem.

{ Add a Comment }

An Appeal to President Putin and the Russian Federation: Please Provide Direct Military and Administrative Support for Gaza and Palestine By Arthur Topham

Dear Ambassador,
It would be with great and sincere appreciation if you could pass this appeal on to President Putin and the Russian Federation for their consideration.
The world requires peace and I believe that the Russian Federation holds the means to accomplishing that noble aim in its hands.
Thank you,
Sincerely,
Arthur Topham
Publisher & Editor
The Radical Press
Email: [email protected]
Phone: 1-250-992-3479
4633 Barkerville Highway
Quesnel, B.C. V2J 6T8

Dear President Putin and the People of the Russian Federation,
Recent events in Gaza have now shown the world that Israel is prepared to genocide the whole of the Palestinian people in its quest for absolute control of the Middle East. Their blatant actions have pushed the envelope of their credibility as a morally and legally acceptable member of the nations of the planet to its maximum and the time has come for the international community to execute extraordinary measures that go beyond the scope of what the United Nations Organization is capable of providing in terms of reasonable protection for the Palestinian people.
Without a doubt the West has also lost the ability to respond to this crucial crisis that now faces Palestine and Gaza. Every nation state is fully under the sway of the Zionist juggernaut that’s been steadily and relentlessly pursuing its agenda for, not only middle eastern dominance, but global hegemony.
The world, now more than ever in its history, is a tinderbox of terror and fear held in some strange, occult form of spiritually and morally suspended animation while the people are left emasculated and bereft of any real means of affecting what is now transpiring in Gaza. Their so-called ‘democratic’ governments have all been deliberately misdirected by the Zionist forces within their boundaries so as to effect a debilitating situation wherein all of the heads of state are now held in thrall to Israel and no longer willing to listen to their people and stand up for International law and what is morally and humanly acceptable behaviour.
Paralyzed, as it were, by the Zionist lobby and the machinations of the Zionist media that heavily influences public opinion, we, the people of the West are now powerless to intervene in any meaningful way in order to stop the slaughter and destruction that is occurring in Gaza.
Time is of the essence. We need help from the only remaining power in the West that has the strength and the rectitude to come to the aid of the Palestinian people and that is Russia.
It is my plea to you that you initiate direct communications with the government of Hamas and offer to immediately send Russian military and medical personal to Gaza and to the West Bank and set up a mutually agreed upon pact that would see any and all military aggression on the part of the state of Israel met by direct and immediate counter attacks against the cities of Israel using equivalent or superior technological weaponry.
My plea is for Russian to take on the role of protectorate of the Palestinian people and all of the territory that has been illegally expropriated from them since the inception of the Jewish state of Israel in May of 1948. It’s the only plan of action that will realistically stop the killing of the Palestinian people and the theft of their land and resources.
The world stands ready for any nation with the military might and the strength and resilience of character to come to the aid of Gaza and the people of Palestine as a whole. I believe that fate has ordained it is for the Russian people to willingly take on this task on behalf of a world now sorely distressed and incapacitated by centuries of Zionist intrigue and manipulation. I also believe that in doing so Russia will go down in history as the one nation that was ultimately responsible for having put an end to global conflict and bringing peace to the world.
The time for your intervention in the genocide of Gaza is upon you. Please respond, not only for the sake of the Palestinian people but for the world at large who long for the bloodshed and the destruction to finally end.
Sincerely,

Arthur Topham
Publisher & Editor
The Radical Press
Canada

{ Add a Comment }

Open Letter to B.C. Premier Christie Clark from Radical Press Publisher Arthur Topham

Ms. Clark,

I cannot adequately convey my deep sense of disappointment and outrage over the fact that you have appeared before B.C.’s Zionist Jew community in Vancouver and despoiled and sullied the good name of the province of British Columbia and all of its inhabitants by speaking to and telling the crowd of complicit Zionist war criminals within its midst that British Columbians support the bloody, genocidal actions of the state of Israel against the defenceless people of Gaza, Palestine.

By your own actions you are telling the world, not just B.C., that all the citizens of this great province support the ongoing slaughter of children and women and men in Gaza, and in doing so you not only are betraying the trust of British Columbians but committing an act of treason against your country.

The state of Israel is the most belligerent, blood-thirsty, zealously racist, rogue, apartheid nation on the face of the planet; one that’s been illegally and irrationally stealing territory from the rightful owners of the land since its inception in 1948, using murder and genocide and terror of the defenceless Palestinian people as its primary aim, all with the intention of driving the Palestinians out of their own territory so that Israel can gain control of the land and all its resources.

Israel has herded the Palestinians into concentration camps like Gaza and then imposed outrageously unjust restrictions upon their freedoms so as to make them dependent upon the Israeli state for all basic necessities like water, food, medical supplies and education.

As this unjustifiable carnage and slaughter continues and the world’s media, controlled by the Zionist Jews, continues to pump out its lies and anti-Palestinian propaganda on a 24/7 basis, people around the world are rising up to protest the crimes of Israel against their helpless victims, finally realizing from all the blatant, astounding destruction and death, that this Jews-only, supremacist state is not only a threat to peace in the Middle East but the number one stumbling block to peace around the world.

As a citizen of the province of B.C. from before the time that you were born I strongly object to the fact that you’ve assumed the right to speak on my behalf and attempted to tell the Jewish Zionist community of Vancouver that all of British Columbia is in full support of Israel’s illegal, immoral, illogical and ill-conceived actions toward the people of Gaza. Nothing could be further from the truth. Your complicity in this matter is beyond the pale of anything resembling a humanitarian, statesman-like approach to a conflict that’s been the bane of civilized people for the past sixty-six years of Israel’s existence as an independent member of the world’s nations.

Your callous and crude display of feigned allegiance to the racist, murderous actions of Israel, all based upon the lie that ‘Israel has the right to defend itself’ by slaughtering innocent men, women and children, will go down in history as yet one more example of how the mighty have fallen for the lies of World Jewry’s insidious, ongoing propaganda.

I cannot tell you just how ashamed I am of you and your government for having taken this political stance in your unabashed support for war crimes committed by the state of Israel. As head of B.C.’s elected government you’ve added your name and the name of the B.C. Liberal Party to a growing list of undisguised, shameless traitors and sycophants who, like Prime Minister Stephen Harper, have dragged Canada’s former reputation as a peace-loving nation down into the gore and blood and rubble and terror that is Gaza today.

Were you a true Christian I would advise you to fall down on your knees and pray to God to forgive you for your gross stupidity and lack of compassion. Even as a single mother who presumably loves her child, the notion that you can stand up in public and brazenly support a tribe of racist, self-serving malcontents who are sacrificing and slaughtering little children by the hundreds, is beyond comprehension for anyone, Christian or otherwise, who has and who loves their own children and grandchildren.

It begs the question Christie Clark: for what price have you sold your soul to this Machiavellian agenda that political Zionism has created around the world? We all, by now, realize the inordinate influence of the Jewish lobby and the ‘power of their purse’ as well as the absolute media control that they have here in Canada and around the globe, all of which only makes them that much more delusional, believing in their own rabbinically induced phantasy that they are somehow, ‘God’s chosen people’ destined to become the heirs to not only all of Palestine but to the planet itself. They obviously have chosen of their own accord to assume such a mantle of malicious intent and ill-will and mask it behind their endless lies and media cover ups which you, in your servile display of flattery and obsequiousness before the crowd assembled at the Temple Sholom synagogue in Vancouver have only helped to exacerbate.

Your pretentiousness and arrogance in thinking that by aligning your party and the province with this dark, sinister, demonic and evil presence you will somehow gain any positive benefits for B.C. or your party is both ill-conceived and erroneous. You’ve only brought shame and disgrace to our province and shown the world that you and your Liberal party are nothing more than complicit, guilty war criminals deserving of nothing less than to be removed from office and banished from Canada forever.

Sincerely,

Arthur Topham
Pub/Ed
RadicalPress.com
Canada’s Radical News Network
‘Digging to the root of the issues since 1998’

{ Add a Comment }

The Israeli Genocide Of Gaza Continues: I Was Wondering When These Psychotic Criminals Would Play Their Holocaust Card, And Here We Go!

The slaughter of the innocent people of Gaza continues… Right now, the criminally psychotic state of Israel has turned their armies towards the center of Gaza itself and especially Gaza City itself. Over the next few days I can guarantee that the death toll from these mass murdering thugs as they continue to shoot and maim Palestinians without any just cause will escalate. What we are indeed witnessing it the criminal Israeli ‘final solution’ to the Palestinian ‘problem’ which will be the extermination of every single one of them. It is cold blooded murder and much of the world remains blinded to the truth of this slaughter thanks to the criminal Jewish control of the media and our governments.
With the psychotic Israelis no longer able to use the ‘murder’ of those three Israeli youths last month as their excuse for the extermination of the Palestinians in Gaza, I was wondering when these psychos would try to play their ultimate ‘trump card’ by trying to insanely equate this slaughter to their still unproven and unresearchable ‘Holocaust’ of World War II. Well it seems we need not wait any longer, for according to this newest article from the Jerusalem Post online news service at www.jpost.com, these psychos are claiming that the ongoing protests across Europe and America against their evil actions in Gaza could lead to a rapid rise in ‘antisemitism’ and even a new ‘holocaust’. The article itself is entitled: ‘We Are Looking At The Beginning Of A New Holocaust’ and I have it right here for everyone to view in disgust for themselves. I do have my usual thoughts and comments to follow:
Screen Shot 2014-07-28 at 10.22.53 PM
The situation facing European Jewry is ‘simply intolerable, unacceptable and inexcusable,’ Israeli Jewish Congress president Vladimir Sloutsker told MKs and foreign diplomats at a special session of the Knesset Immigration, Absorption and Diaspora Committee on Monday.
Calling the rise in anti-Semitic incidents accompanying Israel’s invasion of Gaza an ‘SOS situation,’ Sloutsker warned that if left unchecked, such behavior could lead to another European genocide.
‘Never before since the Holocaust, have we seen such a situation as today,’ he said, referring to the continent-wide demonstrations by pro-Palestinian activists, a number of which have generated into violence and many of which have featured racist rhetoric.
‘We are potentially looking at the beginning of another Holocaust now. These events [violent demonstrations and expressions of anti-Semitism] will only grow in scale across Europe,’ he asserted.
Addressing the legislators and representatives of a number of European governments, including those of Denmark, Holland and France, the oligarch and former head of the Russian Jewish Congress called for Jewish communities across the continent to ‘unite and consolidate.’
Sloutsker also called on all European governments to impose what he called ‘strict regulations’ on the format and content of demonstrations in order to prevent further violence against Jews.
Citing a recent proposal by Belgian Jewry to establish a position of Special European Commissioner to monitor and combat anti-Semitism and racism, Sloutsker said such measures would ‘help send a strong message that European leadership is united and committed to combating anti-Semitism, racism and xenophobia.’
A number of Israeli legislators echoed Sloutsker’s call for a more proactive European approach to combating anti-Semitism.
‘Fight together with us,’ MK Shimon Ohayon urged the diplomats present, adding that he was opposed to ‘dangerous propaganda’ that painted Israel as an aggressor.
Jews in Europe have been targeted because they are Jewish and not because of any territorial claim or conflict in the Middle East, the lawmaker asserted, but ‘because they are against them because they are Jews,’ citing attacks against Jews in France, including a recent riot in the Parisian suburb of Sarcelles in which the synagogue and Jewish stores were targeted by people.
‘We ask you to stop this wheel’ of ‘anti-Semitic hatred in Europe,’ he added, calling anti-Zionism the ‘new anti-Semitism.’
The world ‘must understand’ that Israel is fighting against terrorism, committee chairman Yoel Rzbozov said in response to Ohayon’s statement, echoing the prevailing sentiment among the lawmakers present.
The state will not allow one Jew to remain undefended, MK Yisrael Hasson chimed in, asserting that the fates of European and Israeli Jews are intertwined.
Jews is Belgium are being asked ‘why are you killing children in Gaza?’ Rafael Werner, a representative of Belgium’s Jewish community recounted, asserting that there is little distinction being made between Jews and Israelis.
‘There is no hasbara in Europe,’ he complained, using the Hebrew term for public diplomacy.
The situation in Europe is ‘dire,’ said MP Meir Habib, a Jew who represents French expatriates in the National Assembly. While praising the French political leadership for their commitment to defending their country’s Jewish community, he said that hearing calls for the deaths of Jews at demonstrations left him ‘concerned that there will be a second Toulouse,’ a reference to the 2012 shooting deaths of several Jews at a Jewish school in that city.
Decrying what he perceived as a lack of concern for the mass deaths accompanying the Syrian civil war, Habib complained that accusations of ‘disproportionate’ actions by Israeli forces have been harmful and asserted that the media is ‘the primary problem.’
Most French Jews will remain in France despite a high rate of emigration, he concluded, imploring his Israeli counterparts to ‘help those who stay.’
European representatives present during the meeting sought to assure the room that their governments are committed to defending local communities.
‘We refuse to allow any conflict to be imported into French society,’ a representative of the French embassy said. ‘The security of the Jewish citizens of France is an utmost priority for us. Our determination will not falter.’
‘Forceful measures have to be taken against cases of anti-Semitism or it will increase,’ Dutch Ambassador Casper Veldkamp said. ‘The situation is severe. We risk importing the conflict from the Middle East to Europe when Europe should export respect.’
Danish Ambassador Jesper Vahr agreed but cautioned the communal leaders and legislators about linking anti-Semitism and the current Israeli military operation.
‘We are discussing anti-Semitism. There is also another discussion going around the table pertaining Operation Protective Edge,’ he said. ‘I would warn against mixing apples and oranges…we as a society also defend the right of people in Denmark to voice their protests against the actions happening on the ground. You know the position of my government on that.’
However, he added, Denmark supports Israel’s ‘right to defend itself’ and will ‘exert all efforts to fight the scourge of anti-Semitism.’
———
NTS Notes: Again, because I do live in Jew occupied Canada and we have our own outrageous ‘hate crime’ laws that muzzle any research into the validity of the ‘holocaust’, I cannot comment about that period of history… I ask everyone to do their own research and to draw their own conclusions…..
What we have here is a vain attempt by these psychos to get their slaves in the European Union to squash any protests and dissent against their actions in Gaza…. The problem is that people are not stupid, and can clearly see that these psychos are indeed out to slaughter and exterminate an entire people, and these people are rising up against Jewry and protesting in the streets of Europe and everywhere around the world…
I do have a suggestion for these monsters… If they do not like the fact that people are protesting and waking the hell up to their evil actions then how about stopping your aggression and genocide against the Palestinians… And how about giving up your evil ways and actually try to live with the rest of mankind?
I knew it was only going to be a matter of time before these monsters tried their fraud ‘holocaust card’ to try to end protests against their evil actions… The problem is that by now everyone is no longer fooled by this ‘holocaust’ rhetoric. The Jews have tried to play that card so many times in the past that people are sick of their lies and deceit. Therefore the screams of ‘holocaust’ are now falling on deaf ears…
The world is indeed waking up to the danger of these monsters and what they are doing in Gaza. Their constant whining, always trying to play the ‘victim’, and cries of ‘Holocaust’ are definitely no longer working..
More to come
NTS

{ Add a Comment }

THE PROTOCOLS #19 to #24

1. If we do not permit any independent dabbling in the political we shall on the other hand encourage every kind of report or petition with proposals for the government to examine into all kinds of projects for the amelioration of the condition of the people; this will reveal to us the defects or else the fantasies of our subjects, to which we shall respond either by accomplishing them or by a wise rebuttment to prove the shortsightedness of one who judges wrongly.
2. Sedition-mongering is nothing more than the yapping of a lap-dog at an elephant. For a government well organized, not from the police but from the public point of view, the lap-dog yaps at the elephant in entire unconsciousness of its strength and importance. It needs no more than to take a good example to show the relative importance of both and the lap-dogs will cease to yap and will wag their tails the moment they set eyes on an elephant.
3. In order to destroy the prestige of heroism for political crime we shall send it for trial in the category of thieving, murder, and every kind of abominable and filthy crime. Public opinion will then confuse in its conception this category of crime with the disgrace attaching to every other and will brand it with the same contempt.
4. We have done our best, and I hope we have succeeded to obtain that the GOYIM should not arrive at this means of contending with sedition. It was for this reason that through the Press and in speeches, indirectly in cleverly compiled school-books on history, we have advertised the martyrdom alleged to have been accredited by sedition-mongers for the idea of the commonweal. This advertisement has increased the contingent of liberals and has brought thousands of GOYIM into the ranks of our livestock cattle.
PROTOCOL No. 20
1. To-day we shall touch upon the financial program, which I put off to the end of my report as being the most difficult, the crowning and the decisive point of our plans. Before entering upon it I will remind you that I have already spoken before by way of a hint when I said that the sum total of our actions is settled by the question of figures.

2. When we come into our kingdom our autocratic government will avoid, from a principle of self-preservation, sensibly burdening the masses of the people with taxes, remembering that it plays the part of father and protector. But as State organization cost dear it is necessary nevertheless to obtain the funds required for it. It will, therefore, elaborate with particular precaution the question of equilibrium in this matter.
3. Our rule, in which the king will enjoy the legal fiction that everything in his State belongs to him (which may easily be translated into fact), will be enabled to resort to the lawful confiscation of all sums of every kind for the regulation of their circulation in the State. From this follows that taxation will best be covered by a progressive tax on property. In this manner the dues will be paid without straitening or ruining anybody in the form of a percentage of the amount of property. The rich must be aware that it is their duty to place a part of their superfluities at the disposal of the State since the State guarantees them security of possession of the rest of their property and the right of honest gains, I say honest, for the control over property will do away with robbery on a legal basis.
4. This social reform must come from above, for the time is ripe for it it is indispensable as a pledge of peace.
WE SHALL DESTROY CAPITAL
5. The tax upon the poor man is a seed of revolution and works to the detriment of the State which in hunting after the trifling is missing the big. Quite apart from this, a tax on capitalists diminishes the growth of wealth in private hands in which we have in these days concentrated it as a counterpoise to the government strength of the GOYIM their State finances.
6. A tax increasing in a percentage ratio to capital will give much larger revenue than the present individual or property tax, which is useful to us now for the sole reason that it excites trouble and discontent among the GOYIM.
7. The force upon which our king will rest consists in the equilibrium and the guarantee of peace, for the sake of which things it is indispensable that the capitalists should yield up a portion of their incomes for the sake of the secure working of the machinery of the State. State needs must be paid by those who will not feel the burden and have enough to take from.
8. Such a measure will destroy the hatred of the poor man for the rich, in whom he will see a necessary financial support for the State, will see in him the organizer of peace and well-being since he will see that it is the rich man who is paying the necessary means to attain these things.
9. In order that payers of the educated classes should not too much distress themselves over the new payments they will have full accounts given them of the destination of those payments, with the exception of such sums as will be appropriated for the needs of the throne and the administrative institutions.
10. He who reigns will not have any properties of his own once all in the State represented his patrimony, or else the one would be in contradiction to the other; the fact of holding private means would destroy the right of property in the common possessions of all.
11. Relatives of him who reigns, his heirs excepted, who will be maintained by the resources of the State, must enter the ranks of servants of the State or must work to obtain the right to property; the privilege of royal blood must not serve for the spoiling of the treasury.
12. Purchase, receipt of money or inheritance will be subject to the payment of a stamp progressive tax. Any transfer of property, whether money or other, without evidence of payment of this tax which will be strictly registered by names, will render the former holder liable to pay interest on the tax from the moment of transfer of these sums up to the discovery of his evasion of declaration of the transfer. Transfer documents must be presented weekly at the local treasury office with notifications of the name, surname and permanent place of residence of the former and the new holder of the property. This transfer with register of names must begin from a definite sum which exceeds the ordinary expenses of buying and selling necessaries, and these will be subject to payment only by a stamp impost of a definite percentage of the unit.
13. Just strike an estimate of how many times such taxes as these will cover the revenue of the GOYIM States.
WE CAUSE DEPRESSIONS
14. The State exchequer will have to maintain a definite complement of reserve sums, and all that is collected above that complement must be returned into circulation. On these sums will be organized public works. The initiative in works of this kind, proceeding from State sources, will bind the working class firmly to the interests of the State and to those who reign. From these same sums also a part will be set aside as rewards of inventiveness and productiveness.
15. On no account should so much as a single unit above the definite and freely estimated sums be retained in the State Treasuries, for money exists to be circulated and any kind of stagnation of money acts ruinously on the running of the State machinery, for which it is the lubricant; a stagnation of the lubricant may stop the regular working of the mechanism.
16. The substitution of interest-bearing paper for a part of the token of exchange has produced exactly this stagnation. The consequences of this circumstance are already sufficiently noticeable.
17. A court of account will also be instituted by us, and in it the ruler will find at any moment a full accounting for State income and expenditure, with the exception of the current monthly account, not yet made up, and that of the preceding month, which will not yet have been delivered.
18. The one and only person who will have no interest in robbing the State is its owner, the ruler. This is why his personal control will remove the possibility of leakages or extravagances.
19. The representative function of the ruler at receptions for the sake of etiquette, which absorbs so much invaluable time, will be abolished in order that the ruler may have time for control and consideration. His power will not then be split up into fractional parts among time-serving favorites who surround the throne for its pomp and splendor, and are interested only in their own and not in the common interests of the State.
20. Economic crises have been produced by us for the GOYIM by no other means than the withdrawal of money from circulation. Huge capitals have stagnated, withdrawing money from States, which were constantly obliged to apply to those same stagnant capitals for loans. These loans burdened the finances of the State with the payment of interest and made them the bond slaves of these capitals …. The concentration of industry in the hands of capitalists out of the hands of small masters has drained away all the juices of the peoples and with them also the States …
21. The present issue of money in general does not correspond with the requirements per head, and cannot therefore satisfy all the needs of the workers. The issue of money ought to correspond with the growth of population and thereby children also must absolutely be reckoned as consumers of currency from the day of their birth. The revision of issue is a material question for the whole world.
22. YOU ARE AWARE THAT THE GOLD STANDARD HAS BEEN THE RUIN OF THE STATES WHICH ADOPTED IT, FOR IT HAS NOT BEEN ABLE TO SATISFY THE DEMANDS FOR MONEY, THE MORE SO THAT WE HAVE REMOVED GOLD FROM CIRCULATION AS FAR AS POSSIBLE.
GENTILE STATES BANKRUPT
23. With us the standard that must be introduced is the cost of working-man power, whether it be reckoned in paper or in wood. We shall make the issue of money in accordance with the normal requirements of each subject, adding to the quantity with every birth and subtracting with every death.
24. The accounts will be managed by each department (the French administrative division), each circle.
25. In order that there may be no delays in the paying out of money for State needs the sums and terms of such payments will be fixed by decree of the ruler; this will do away with the protection by a ministry of one institution to the detriment of others.
26. The budgets of income and expenditure will be carried out side by side that they may not be obscured by distance one to another.
27. The reforms projected by us in the financial institutions and principles of the GOYIM will be clothed by us in such forms as will alarm nobody. We shall point out the necessity of reforms in consequence of the disorderly darkness into which the GOYIM by their irregularities have plunged the finances. The first irregularity, as we shall point out, consists in their beginning with drawing up a single budget which year after year grows owing to the following cause: this budget is dragged out to half the year, then they demand a budget to put things right, and this they expend in three months, after which they ask for a supplementary budget, and all this ends with a liquidation budget. But, as the budget of the following year is drawn up in accordance with the sum of the total addition, the annual departure from the normal reaches as much as 50 per cent in a year, and so the annual budget is trebled in ten years. Thanks to such methods, allowed by the carelessness of the GOY States, their treasuries are empty. The period of loans supervenes, and that has swallowed up remainders and brought all the GOY States to bankruptcy.
28. You understand perfectly that economic arrangements of this kind, which have been suggested to the GOYIM by us, cannot be carried on by us.
29. Every kind of loan proves infirmity in the State and a want of understanding of the rights of the State. Loans hang like a sword of Damocles over the heads of rulers, who, instead of taking from their subjects by a temporary tax, come begging with outstretched palm to our bankers. Foreign loans are leeches which there is no possibility of removing from the body of the State until they fall off of themselves or the State flings them off. But the GOY States do not tear them off; they go on in persisting in putting more on to themselves so that they must inevitably perish, drained by voluntary blood-letting.
TYRANNY OF USURY
30. What also indeed is, in substance, a loan, especially a foreign loan? A loan is an issue of government bills of exchange containing a percentage obligation commensurate to the sum of the loan capital. If the loan bears a charge of 5 per cent, then in twenty years the State vainly pays away in interest a sum equal to the loan borrowed, in forty years it is paying a double sum, in sixty treble, and all the while the debt remains an unpaid debt.
31. From this calculation it is obvious that with any form of taxation per head the State is baling out the last coppers of the poor taxpayers in order to settle accounts with wealthy foreigners, from whom it has borrowed money instead of collecting these coppers for its own needs without the additional interest.
32. So long as loans were internal the GOYIM only shuffled their money from the pockets of the poor to those of the rich, but when we bought up the necessary persons in order to transfer loans into the external sphere, all the wealth of States flowed into our cash-boxes and all the GOYIM began to pay us the tribute of subjects.
33. If the superficiality of GOY kings on their thrones in regard to State affairs and the venality of ministers or the want of understanding of financial matters on the part of other ruling persons have made their countries debtors to our treasuries to amounts quite impossible to pay it has not been accomplished without, on our part, heavy expenditure of trouble and money.
34. Stagnation of money will not be allowed by us and therefore there will be no State interest-bearing paper, except a one per-cent series, so that there will be no payment of interest to leeches that suck all the strength out of the State. The right to issue interest-bearing paper will be given exclusively to industrial companies who find no difficulty in paying interest out of profits, whereas the State does not make interest on borrowed money like these companies, for the State borrows to spend and not to use in operations.
35. Industrial papers will be bought also by the government which from being as now a paper of tribute by loan operations will be transformed into a lender of money at a profit. This measure will stop the stagnation of money, parasitic profits and idleness, all of which were useful for us among the GOYIM so long as they were independent but are not desirable under our rule.
36. How clear is the undeveloped power of thought of the purely brute brains of the GOYIM, as expressed in the fact that they have been borrowing from us with payment of interest without ever thinking that all the same these very moneys plus an addition for payment of interest must be got by them from their own State pockets in order to settle up with us. What could have been simpler than to take the money they wanted from their own people?
37. But it is a proof of the genius of our chosen mind that we have contrived to present the matter of loans to them in such a light that they have even seen in them an advantage for themselves.
38. Our accounts, which we shall present when the time comes, in the light of centuries of experience gained by experiments made by us on the GOY States, will be distinguished by clearness and definiteness and will show at a glance to all men the advantage of our innovations. They will put an end to those abuses to which we owe our mastery over the GOYIM, but which cannot be allowed in our kingdom.
39. We shall so hedge about our system of accounting that neither the ruler nor the most insignificant public servant will be in a position to divert even the smallest sum from its destination without detection or to direct it in another direction except that which will be once fixed in a definite plan of action.
40. And without a definite plan it is impossible to rule. Marching along an undetermined road and with undetermined resources brings to ruin by the way heroes and demi-gods.
41. The GOY rulers, whom we once upon a time advised should be distracted from State occupations by representative receptions, observances of etiquette, entertainments, were only screens for our rule. The accounts of favorite courtiers who replaced them in the sphere of affairs were drawn up for them by our agents, and every time gave satisfaction to short-sighted minds by promises that in the future economies and improvements were foreseen … Economies from what? From new taxes? were questions that might have been but were not asked by those who read our accounts and projects.
42. You know to what they have been brought by this carelessness, to what pitch of financial disorder they have arrived, notwithstanding the astonishing industry of their peoples …
PROTOCOL No. 21
1. To what I reported to you at the last meeting I shall now add a detailed explanation of internal loans. Of foreign loans I shall say nothing more, because they have fed us with the national moneys of the GOYIM, but for our State there will be no foreigners, that is, nothing external.
2. We have taken advantage of the venality of administrators and slackness of rulers to get our moneys twice, thrice and more times over, by lending to the GOY governments moneys which were not at all needed by the States. Could anyone do the like in regard to us? … Therefore, I shall only deal with the details of internal loans.
3. States announce that such a loan is to be concluded and open subscriptions for their own bills of exchange, that is, for their interest-bearing paper. That they may be within the reach of all the price is determined at from a hundred to a thousand; and a discount is made for the earliest subscribers. Next day by artificial means the price of them goes up, the alleged reason being that everyone is rushing to buy them. In a few days the treasury safes are, as they say, overflowing and there’s more money than they can do with. The subscription, it is alleged, covers many times over the issue total of the loan; in this lies the whole stage effect look you, they say, what confidence is shown in the government’s bills of exchange.
4. But when the comedy is played out there emerges the fact that a debit and an exceedingly burdensome debit has been created. For the payment of interest it becomes necessary to have recourse to new loans, which do not swallow up but only add to the capital debt. And when this credit is exhausted it becomes necessary by new taxes to cover, not the loan, BUT ONLY THE INTEREST ON IT. These taxes are a debit employed to cover a debit …
5. Later comes the time for conversions, but they diminish the payment of interest without covering the debt, and besides they cannot be made without the consent of the lenders; on announcing a conversion a proposal is made to return the money to those who are not willing to convert their paper. If everybody expressed his unwillingness and demanded his money back, the government would be hoist on their own petard and would be found insolvent and unable to pay the proposed sums. By good luck the subjects of the GOY governments, knowing nothing about financial affairs, have always preferred losses on exchange and diminution of interest to the risk of new investments of their moneys, and have thereby many a time enabled these governments to throw off their shoulders a debit of several millions.
6. Nowadays, with external loans, these tricks cannot be played by the GOYIM for they know that we shall demand all our moneys back.
7. In this way in acknowledged bankruptcy will best prove to the various countries the absence of any means between the interests of the peoples and of those who rule them.
8. I beg you to concentrate your particular attention upon this point and upon the following: nowadays all internal loans are consolidated by so-called flying loans, that is, such as have terms of payment more or less near. These debts consist of moneys paid into the savings banks and reserve funds. If left for long at the disposition of a government these funds evaporate in the payment of interest on foreign loans, and are placed by the deposit of equivalent amount of RENTS.
9. And these last it is which patch up all the leaks in the State treasuries of the GOYIM.
10. When we ascend the throne of the world all these financial and similar shifts, as being not in accord with our interests, will be swept away so as not to leave a trace, as also will be destroyed all money markets, since we shall not allow the prestige of our power to be shaken by fluctuations of prices set upon our values, which we shall announce by law at the price which represents their full worth without any possibility of lowering or raising.
11. We shall replace the money markets by grandiose government credit institutions, the object of which will be to fix the price of industrial values in accordance with government views. These institutions will be in a position to fling upon the market five hundred millions of industrial paper in one day, or to buy up for the same amount. In this way all industrial undertakings will come into dependence upon us. You may imagine for yourselves what immense power we shall thereby secure for ourselves …
PROTOCOL No. 22
1 In all that has so far been reported by me to you, I have endeavored to depict with care the secret of what is coming, of what is past, and of what is going on now, rushing into the flood of the great events coming already in the near future, the secret of our relations to the GOYIM and of financial operations. On this subject there remains still a little for me to add.
2. IN OUR HANDS IS THE GREATEST POWER OF OUR DAY GOLD: IN TWO DAYS WE CAN PROCURE FROM OUR STOREHOUSES ANY QUANTITY WE MAY PLEASE.
3. Surely there is no need to seek further proof that our rule is predestined by God? Surely we shall not fail with such wealth to prove that all that evil which for so many centuries we have had to commit has served at the end of ends the cause of true well-being the bringing of everything into order? Though it be even by the exercise of some violence, yet all the same it will be established. We shall contrive to prove that we are benefactors who have restored to the rent and mangled earth the true good and also freedom of the person, and therewith we shall enable it to be enjoyed in peace and quiet, with proper dignity of relations, on the condition, of course, of strict observance of the laws established by us. We shall make plain therewith that freedom does not consist in dissipation and in the right of unbridled license any more than the dignity and force of a man do not consist in the right of everyone to promulgate destructive principles in the nature of freedom of conscience, equality and the like, that freedom of the person in no wise consists in the right to agitate oneself and others by abominable speeches before disorderly mobs, and that true freedom consists in the inviolability of the person who honorably and strictly observes all the laws of life in common, that human dignity is wrapped up in consciousness of the rights and also of the absence of rights of each, and not wholly and solely in fantastic imaginings about the subject of one’s EGO.
4. One authority will be glorious because it will be all-powerful, will rule and guide, and not muddle along after leaders and orators shrieking themselves hoarse with senseless words which they call great principles and which are nothing else, to speak honestly, but utopian … Our authority will be the crown of order, and in that is included the whole happiness of man. The aureole of this authority will inspire a mystical bowing of the knee before it and a reverent fear before it of all the peoples. True force makes no terms with any right, not even with that of God: none dare come near to it so as to take so much as a span from it away.
PROTOCOL No. 23
1. That the peoples may become accustomed to obedience it is necessary to inculcate lessons of humility and therefore to reduce the production of articles of luxury. By this we shall improve morals which have been debased by emulation in the sphere of luxury. We shall re-establish small master production which will mean laying a mine under the private capital of manufactures. This is indispensable also for the reason that manufacturers on the grand scale often move, though not always consciously, the thoughts of the masses in directions against the government. A people of small masters knows nothing of unemployment and this binds him closely with existing order, and consequently with the firmness of authority. For us its part will have been played out the moment authority is transferred into our hands. Drunkenness also will be prohibited by law and punishable as a crime against the humanness of man who is turned into a brute under the influence of alcohol.
2. Subjects, I repeat once more, give blind obedience only to the strong hand which is absolutely independent of them, for in it they feel the sword of defense and support against social scourges … What do they want with an angelic spirit in a king? What they have to see in him is the personification of force and power.
3. The supreme lord who will replace all now existing rulers, dragging in their existence among societies demoralized by us, societies that have denied even the authority of God, from whose midst breeds out on all sides the fire of anarchy, must first of all proceed to quench this all-devouring flame. Therefore he will be obliged to kill off those existing societies, though he should drench them with his own blood, that he may resurrect them again in the form of regularly organized troops fighting consciously with every kind of infection that may cover the body of the State with sores.
4. This Chosen One of God is chosen from above to demolish the senseless forces moved by instinct and not reason, by brutishness and not humanness. These forces now triumph in manifestations of robbery and every kind of violence under the mask of principles of freedom and rights. They have overthrown all forms of social order to erect on the ruins the throne of the King of the Jews; but their part will be played out the moment he enters into his kingdom. Then it will be necessary to sweep them away from his path, on which must be left no knot, no splinter.
5. Then will it be possible for us to say to the peoples of the world: ‘Give thanks to God and bow the knee before him who bears on his front the seal of the predestination of man, to which God himself has led his star that none other but Him might free us from all the before-mentioned forces and evils’.
PROTOCOL No. 24
1. I pass now to the method of confirming the dynastic roots of King David to the last strata of the earth.
2. This confirmation will first and foremost be included in that which to this day has rested the force of conservatism by our learned elders of the conduct of the affairs of the world, in the directing of the education of thought of all humanity.
3. Certain members of the seed of David will prepare the kings and their heirs, selecting not by right of heritage but by eminent capacities, inducting them into the most secret mysteries of the political, into schemes of government, but providing always that none may come to knowledge of the secrets. The object of this mode of action is that all may know that government cannot be entrusted to those who have not been inducted into the secret places of its art…
4. To these persons only will be taught the practical application of the aforenamed plans by comparison of the experiences of many centuries, all the observations on the politico-economic moves and social sciences in a word, all the spirit of laws which have been unshakably established by nature herself for the regulation of the relations of humanity.
5. Direct heirs will often be set aside from ascending the throne if in their time of training they exhibit frivolity, softness and other qualities that are the ruin of authority, which render them incapable of governing and in themselves dangerous for kingly office.
6. Only those who are unconditionally capable for firm, even if it be to cruelty, direct rule will receive the reins of rule from our learned elders.
7. In case of falling sick with weakness of will or other form of incapacity. kings must by law hand over the reins of rule to new and capable hands.
8. The king’s plan of action for the current moment, and all the more so for the future, will be unknown, even to those who are called his closest counselors.
KING OF THE JEWS
9. Only the king and the three who stood sponsor for him will know what is coming.
10. In the person of the king who with unbending will is master of himself and of humanity all will discern as it were fate with its mysterious ways. None will know what the king wishes to attain by his dispositions, and therefore none will dare to stand across an unknown path.
11. It is understood that the brain reservoir of the king must correspond in capacity to the plan of government it has to contain. It is for this reason that he will ascend the throne not otherwise than after examination of his mind by the aforesaid learned elders.
12. That the people may know and love their king, it is indispensable for him to converse in the market-places with his people. This ensures the necessary clinching of the two forces which are now divided one from another by us by the terror.
13. This terror was indispensable for us till the time comes for both these forces separately to fall under our influence.
14. The king of the Jews must not be at the mercy of his passions, and especially of sensuality: on no side of his character must he give brute instincts power over his mind. Sensuality worse than all else disorganizes the capacities of the mind and clearness of views, distracting the thoughts to the worst and most brutal side of human activity.
15. The prop of humanity in the person of the supreme lord of all the world of the holy seed of David must sacrifice to his people all personal inclinations.
16. Our supreme lord must be of an exemplary irreproachability.

{ Add a Comment }