Back in September of 2005, just a little over seven years ago, I received word that Michel Chossudovsky, Professor of Economics at the University of Ottawa and website owner of GlobalResearch, was being attacked in the Zionist-controlled media by one of its big guns, the Ottawa Citizen. True to form, those behind this orchestrated assault upon Canada’s Charter of Rights & Freedoms were none other than our present gung ho, chutzpah-raving free speech haters, B’nai Brith Canada, the same secret, Jews-only ‘benevolent’ masonic order of pro-Israeli, pro-Zionist lobbyists who have been, and are still, attacking RadicalPress.com and its illustrious Publisher and Editor, Arthur Topham since 2007.
At the time I decided to write an article in Mr. Chossudovsky’s defense; one that would highlight for Canadians the hidden underbelly of this Rothschild-created, Big Brother censorship Beast and show people how it truly operates behind its deceptive, public persona. I called that article, ‘B’nai Brith: Beating the anti-Semitic Drum’.
Now one of the things that the Zionist media are focusing on today in their current smear campaign against my person and my website is the fact that I have on my site a relatively miniscule number (out of over 1400 posts) of the standard anti-Zionist writings that the Zionist Jews have been harping on and crying the blues about for close to a century now. In their entrenched, circumscribed minds they feel that by focusing on these particular writers (Eustace Mullins) or writings (Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion); ones that they’ve expended vast amounts of energy, ink and money on trying to wipe out from the history books of humanity, that they’ll convince readers and listeners that RadicalPress.com is, as one of their recent smug-looking little hack writers for Yahoo! Canada News, Steve Mertl, wrote, ‘…a nasty little blog called Radical Press, which espouses the idea that a worldwide cabal of Zionist Jews control the levers of power’ written by the ‘bigot’ Arthur Topham.
The point of their focusing on these selective items, repeated ad nauseam throughout all of their media outlets both across Canada and in foreign nations like Israel, is to first off discourage readers from even going to the site in question, but furthermore, to control the discussion and thwart any need on their part to actually address the numerous other articles written by myself and others that they fear to debate for lack of any reasonable counter argumentation.
It was therefore (in the 2005 article now being edited, re-written and updated) to assist others in comprehending the breadth and depth of this universal scheme to silence dissent and permit an unleashed, purposeful program of pro-Israeli propaganda to emerge throughout Canada’s mainstream media, one affecting both the mass mind of the citizenry as well as the nation’s legal and social fabric, that I wrote the initial article, in the hope and belief that concerned individuals might be made aware of the nascent beginnings of organizations like B’nai Brith International and its subordinate offshoots like B’nai Brith Canada.
In order to define this fantastic Pharisiac phenomenon known as B’nai Brith International and expose its heinous, deadly purpose, it was necessary for me to furnish the reader with some extensively researched commentary from a book written over fifty-five years ago by a once famed (and now defamed) British author and Journalist by the name of Douglas Reed.
Reed5
In his virtually unknown (today), yet massively documented and scholarly seminal work on the history of Political Zionism and its effects upon the past and present global political situation, (The Controversy of Zion, Dolphin Press (Pty) Ltd., 1978)[1] Mr. Douglas Reed, former Chief European war correspondent for the London Times and successful author of numerous popular books written prior to, during and after WW II, gave future historians a plethora of extremely pertinent contextual information concerning both B’nai Brith International and the Anti-Defamation League (A.D.L.); factual information that clearly defines and relates to what is presently taking place with respect to B’nai Brith Canada’s current assault upon RadicalPress using Section 319(2) of Canada’s criminal code.
Reed was no slouch when it came to covering historical events of his time and as the pieces of the puzzling times began to take shape before his analytical eye he eventually concluded that the hidden hand behind the paradigm-shattering decisions of his period was none other than that of the Zionist Jews and their obsequious sycophants in high office whom they were able to solicit for support.
In order to understand such a perspective though one needs to cast an eye back a full century to the period of U.S. President Woodrow Wilson’s years in office and the time of the first world war and the creation of the Federal Reserve system. It was during this era that the original silent coup by Zionist forces usurped the independence of the White House and placed its exclusive powers in the hands of Wilson’s chief Advisor Mr. Colonel House, a pro-Zionist proponent.
In his book Reed describes President Wilson as ‘a captive president’ and as the war drew nigh stated that after his election ‘Mr. House took over his correspondence, arranged whom he should see or not receive, told Cabinet officers what they were to say or not to say, and so on.’[2]
I would not hesitate at this point to say that we’re seeing precisely this same phenomenon occurring within Canada’s Conservative government with Harper’s blatantly unabashed public display of seditious grovelling when it comes to anything Zionist or related to Zionism’s captive state, Israel.
Reed, who was born in 1895 just two years prior to Theodor Herzl (Political Zionism’s official founder) setting up the World Zionist Organization in 1897, grew up during the early years of the 20th Century and came of age, politically-speaking, while living in Europe throughout the thirties and forties, witnessing in detail the intimate machinations by the world leaders who were then rearranging the pieces on the world’s political chessboard.
In his exhaustive analysis of how the Zionists slowly, but surely, overtook the U.S. government’s executive levels of command, the better to gain control of policy-making for the exclusive purpose of acquiring the lands of Palestine in order to create their ‘State’ of Israel, Reed emphasized the critical role played by groups such as B’nai Brith International in blocking all criticism of their efforts through the use of blackmail, intimidation and public vilification of the sort we’re now seeing employed against myself and the Radical Press.
It was after this period of initiation into the inner workings of intrigue by the Zionist forces that he began voicing his comments on B’nai Brith International. He writes:
‘At that period (1913) [of Colonel House and W. Wilson, A.T.] an event occurred which seemed of little importance then but needs recording here because of its later, larger consequence. In America was an organization called B’nai Brith (Hebrew for ‘Children of the Covenant’). Founded in 1843 as a fraternal lodge exclusively for Jews, it was called ‘purely an American institution’, but it put out branches in many countries and today claims to ‘represent all Jews throughout the world’, so that it appears to be part of the arrangement described by Dr. Kastein[3] as ‘the Jewish international’. In 1913 B’nai Brith put out a tiny offshoot, the ‘Anti-Defamation League’. It was to grow to great size and power; in it the state-within-states acquired a kind of secret police and it will reappear in this story.’[4]
In Chapter 43, aptly titled ‘The Invasion of America’, Reed describes to a tee the techniques presently being applied to myself and Radical Press in order to discredit my person and my work while at the same time expunging from the public mind of Canadians the true motives of Israeli domestic and foreign policies. Please witness the following comments:
‘While military invasions and counter-invasions multiplied during the six years of the Second War, absorbing all thought and energy of the masses locked in combat, a silent invasion went on which produced more momentous effects than the armed ones. This was the political invasion of the American Republic and its success was shown by the shape of American state policy at the war’s end, which was so directed as to ensure that the only military invasions that yielded enduring ‘territorial gains’ were those of the revolution into Europe[by the Soviet Union. Ed.] and of the Zionists into Arabia . . .’[5]
‘The renewal of large-scale immigration formed the background to the political invasion of the Republic. This was a three-pronged movement which aimed at the capture of the three vital points of a state’s defenses: state policy at the top level, the civil services at the middle level and ‘public opinion’ or the mass-mind at the base. The way in which control over acts of state policy was achieved (through the ‘adviserships’ which became part of American political life after 1913) has already been shown; this part of the process having preceded the others. The methods used to attempt the capture of government services will be discussed later in this chapter. In what immediately follows the capture of the mass-mind in America, through control of published information, will be described; it was indispensable to the other two thrusts. [Emphasis mine. Ed.]
‘This form of political invasion is called by Dr. Weizmann[6], who exhaustively studied it in his youth when he was preparing in Russia for his life’s work in the west, ‘the technique of propaganda and the approach to the masses’. The operation so described may now be studied in actual operation:
‘Far back in this book the reader was invited to note that ‘B’nai Brith’ put out a shoot. B’nai Brith, until then, might be compared with such groups of other religious affiliation as the Young Men’s Christian Association or the Knights of Columbus; its declared objects were the help of the poor, sick and fatherless and good works in general. The little offshoot of 1913, the ‘Anti-Defamation League’, had by 1947 become a secret police of formidable power in America.*
In a footnote Reed adds:
*In fact though not in form. The secret police in countries where the institution is native have their entire power and resources of the state behind them; indeed, they are the state. In America Zionism built the nucleus of a secret police nearly as effective in many ways as those prototypes [the former USSR and China and Israel today. Ed.]. It could only become equally effective if it gained full control of the state’s resources, including the power of arrest and imprisonment, and in my judgment that was the ultimate goal. [It is my contention that this is precisely what has taken place in my own case wherein, through the power and influence of B’nai Brith (via their two front men), they were able to produce a false document full of ‘allegations’ that resulted in Det. Cst. Terry Wilson’s BC HATE CRIME TEAM being given the go-ahead to arrest and incarcerate me and also obtain a Search Warrant which then allowed the police to steal all of my computers and private communications and then impose soviet style restrictions on my ability to post my defence on the Internet and write emails and even browse the Internet! Ed.]
‘In Doublespeak ‘anti-defamation’ means ‘defamation’ and this body lived by calumny, using such terms as anti-semite, fascist, rabble-rouser, Jew-baiter, Red-baiter, paranoiac, lunatic, madman, reactionary, diehard, bigot and more of the like [Including now the term ‘hate’. Emphasis mine. Ed.]. The vocabulary is fixed and may be traced back to the attacks on Barruel, Robison and Morse after the French revolution; the true nature of any writer’s or newspaper’s allegiance may be detected by keeping count of the number of times these trade-mark words are used. The achievement of this organization (usually known as the A.D.L.) has been by iteration to make fetishes of them, so that party politicians hasten to deny that they are any of these things. [Emphasis mine. Ed.] Under this regime reasoned debate became outlawed; there is something of sorcery in this subjugation of two generations of Western men to the mumbo-jumbo of Asiatic conspirators.
‘When the A.D.L. was born in 1913 it had merely desk-room in the parent B’nai Brith office and a tiny budget. In 1933 Mr. Bernard J. Brown wrote, ‘Through the intervention of the A.D.L. we have succeeded in muzzling the non-Jewish press to the extent that newspapers in America abstain from pointing out that any person unfavourably referred to is a Jew’. In 1948 the Jewish Menorah Journal of New York wrote, ‘Should but one phrase in a reprinted literary classic reflect unjustly upon Jews, the A.D.L. will promptly belabour the innocent publisher until he bowdlerizes the offending passage. Let one innocent movie-producer incorporate a Jewish prototype, however inoffensive, in his picture and the hue and cry raised by the A.D.L. will make him wish he’s never heard of Jews . . .
‘These quotations show the growth of the A.D.L.’s power in thirty-five years. It has imposed the law of heresy on the public debate in America. No criticism of Zionism or the world-government plan is allowed to pass without virulent attack; . . . [Emphasis mine. Ed.]
‘America has today a few surviving writers who fight on for independent debate and comment. They will discuss any public matter, in the light of traditional American policy and interest, save Zionism, which hardly any of them will touch. I have discussed this with four of the leading ones, who all gave the same answer: it could not be done. The employed ones would lose their posts, if they made the attempt. The independent ones would find no publisher for their books because no reviewer would mention these, save with the epithets enumerated above.[7]
‘The A.D.L., of such small beginnings in 1913, in 1948 had a budget of three million dollars (it is only one of several Jewish organizations pursuing Zionist aims in America at a similar rate of expenditure). The Menorah Journal, discussing ‘Anti-Defamation Hysteria’, said, ‘Fighting anti-semitism has been built up into a big business, with annual budgets running into millions of dollars’. It said the object was ‘to continue beating the anti-semitic drum’ [Emphasis mine. Ed.] and ‘to scare the pants off prospective contributors’ in order to raise funds. It mentioned some of the methods used (‘outright business blackmail; if you can’t afford to give $10,000 to this cause, you can take your business elsewhere’), and said American Jews were being ‘stampeded into a state of mass-hysteria by their self-styled defenders’.[8]
‘A private organization [B’nai Brith. Ed.] which can produce such results is obviously powerful; there is nothing comparable in the world. Mr. Vincent Sheehan wrote in 1949, ‘There is scarcely a voice in the United States that dares raise itself for the rights, any rights, of the Arabs; any slight criticism of the Zionist high command is immediately labelled as anti-semitic’. . .
[Emphasis mine. Ed.]
‘How is the oracle worked? By what means has America (and the entire West) been brought to the state that no public man aspires to office, or editor feels secure at his desk, until he has brought out his prayer-mat and prostrated himself to Zion? How have presidents and prime ministers been led to compete for the approval of this faction like bridesmaids for the bride’s bouquet? Why do leading men suffer themselves to be paraded at hundred-dollar-a-plate banquets for Zion, or to be herded on to Zionist platforms to receive ‘plaques’ for services rendered? [Such as the recent ‘award’ given to PM Harper by the Zionists while in New York. Ed.]
‘The power of money and the prospect of votes have demonstrably been potent lures, but in my judgment by far the strongest weapon is this power to control published information; to lay stress on what a faction wants and to exclude from it all that the faction dislikes, and so to be able to give any selected person a ‘good’ or a ‘bad’ press. [Emphasis mine. Ed.] This is in fact control of ‘the mob’. In today’s language it is ‘the technique of propaganda and the approach to the masses’, as Dr. Weizmann said, but it is an ancient, Asiatic art and was described, on a famous occasion, by Saint Matthew and Saint Mark: ‘The chief priests and elders persuaded the multitude . . . The chief priests moved the people . . .’
‘In forty years the A.D.L. [i.e. B’nai Brith. Ed.] perfected a machine for persuading the multitude. It is a method of thought-control of which the subject-mass is unconscious and its ability to destroy any who cry out is great . . . [Emphasis mine. Ed.]
‘The A.D.L. (and the American Jewish Committee) ‘set out to make the American people aware of anti-semitism’. It informed Jews that ‘25 out of every 100 Americans are infected with anti-semitism’, and that another 50 might develop the disease. By 1945 it was carrying out ‘a high-powered educational program, geared to reach every man, woman and child’ in America through the press, radio, advertising, children’s comic books and school books, lectures, films, ‘churches’ and trade unions. This programme included ‘219 broadcasts a day’, full-page advertisements in 397 newspapers, poster advertising in 130 cities, and ‘persuasions’ subtly incorporated in the printed matter on blotters, matchbox covers, and envelopes. The entire national press (‘1900 dailies with a 43,000,000 circulation’) and the provincial, Negro, foreign-language and labour newspapers were kept supplied with, ‘and used’, its material in the form of ‘news, background material, cartoons and comic strips’. In addition, the A.D.L. in 1945 distributed ‘more than 330,000 copies of important books carrying our message to libraries and other institutions’, furnished authors with ‘material and complete ideas’, and circulated nine million pamphlets ‘all tailored to fit the audiences to which they are directed’. It found ‘comic books’ to be a particularly effective way of reaching the minds of young people, soldiers, sailors and airmen, and circulated ‘millions of copies’ of propaganda in this form. [Emphasis mine. Ed.] Its organization consisted of the national headquarters, public relations committees in 150 cities, eleven regional offices, and ‘2,000 key men in 1,000 cities’.
The name of the body which supplied this mass of suggestive material never reached the public. During the 1940’s the system of ‘syndicated writers’ in New York or Washington enveloped the entire American press. One such writer’s column may appear in a thousand newspapers each day; editors like this system, which saves them the cost of employing their own writers, for its cheapness. [Those readers who have been following the smear campaign against myself and Radical Press will easily see that this is precisely the technique still being used. The same lies and distortions appear throughout all of the Zionist controlled media throughout Canada. Ed.] Through a few dozen such writers the entire stream of information can be tinctured at its source . . . By all these means a generation has been reared in America (and this applies equally to England [and definitely Canada. Ed.]) which has been deprived of authentic information about, and independent comment on, the nature of Zionism, its original connection with Communism, the infestation of administrations and capture of ‘administrators’, and the relationship of all this to the ultimate world-government project.’ [9]
Reed finally concluded that the greatest of all threats to the USA and other democratic nations, Canada included, was Political Zionism. He writes:
‘The three forces which weaken the whole structure of American public life in effect serve the strongest among themselves, Political Zionism, which stands behind the seats of the mighty while the others [communism and organized crime. Ed.] work in lesser places, if to similar ends of power-over-politicians. The proof of this supremacy is to be found by a simple test: the extent to which public discussion is permitted . . . At the topmost level, a virtual ban on public discussion of Political Zionism proves the paramountcy of its sway in American affairs. [Emphasis mine. Ed.] As in England, the open expression of doubt about this territorial ambition, and support for it, has been almost driven underground in recent years. An imperial thrall has been laid on America in this matter. Traditional Americans, whose forebears detested laws of lese-majesty and the genuflections of courts, now find their leaders performing an even humbler obeisance in this direction; like foremost politicians in England, they thus emulate those Rumanian nobles who long bowed to the Sultan’s rule, vainly hoping to keep rank and possessions. The Soviet ban on ‘anti-Semitism’ (which was in effect a veto on public discussion of the origins of Communism) has in practice been extended to the British island and the American Republic [and Canada. Ed.] in the matter of Political Zionism. It is lese-majesty [i.e. treason A.T.] in a new form and because of it present-day Americans and Englishmen [and Canadians. Ed.] do not as a rule see the grave future courses and penalties to which support of Political Zionism has committed them.’[10]
That, in a nutshell, is the most poignant description of the power and purpose of Zionism’s foremost global censorship organ, B’nai Brith International.
It takes little extrapolating to see that all which Reed described in his above comments dovetails smoothly with the apparent convoluted, confusing and tumultuous period that we’re now experiencing in both Canadian and global politics. To elaborate further upon that subject must remain the labour of another article and another time. What is essential here is that readers note the connectedness of events and the fact that the Political Zionists are still very much alive and alert in their diligent and determined effort to destroy the sovereignty of nation-states, serve the interests of Israel and bring in the ill-fated New World Order under the auspices of their original plan, the United Nations.
To those ends organizations such as the B’nai Brith (Canada) and the A.D.L. have evolved and continue to act as Zionist watchdogs and public censors. It is not surprising therefore that they would eventually attack me and my website RadicalPress.com for Political Zionism’s bold and ambitious plans for global dominance owes allegiance only to its proponents and thus their exclusive and racial policies of imperialism (exemplified in Gaza and the Middle East in general) continue to pose a direct threat to both the Christian and Moslem world.
Our ultimate freedom therefore as an independent and sovereign nation depends upon our ability to combat this censorship of free speech which continually keeps the occult nature of Political Zionism hidden from the public eye and places in jail all those who attempt to unmask its diabolical plan.
————
Footnotes:
[1] The book can be found in the U.S.A. at Abebooks.com or online at http://www.controversyofzion.info .
[2] Controversy of Zion, Page 242
[3] Dr. Joseph Kastein according to Reed was a ‘zealous’ Zionist historian who wrote the book, History and Destiny of the Jews, (Eng. trans., London, 1933). He is extensively quoted by Douglas Reed in his book Controversy of Zion.
[4] Controversy of Zion, Page 243
[5] Controversy of Zion, Page 339
[6] Dr. Chaim Weizmann was a tireless proponent of Zionism. Having supplanted Theodor Herzl as the leader of the World Zionist Organization back in 1904 his influence throughout the formative years of the first half of the 20th Century upon the creation of Israel is well documented. He eventually became Israel’s first Prime Minister in 1948.
[7] Reed had first-hand experience of this practise. In 1952 the Canadian Jewish Congress requested that Canadian booksellers refuse to carry his books. [Emphasis mine. Ed.]
[8] Controversy of Zion, Pages 340 342
[9] Controversy of Zion, Pages 342-345
[10] Far and Wide, Page 274.
Is Alan Hart Running Cover For AIPAC?
‘I understand that you love freedom, but in our crowded world you have to pay a tax for freedom.
Why I Ought to Sue Ezra Levant
Dear Radical Readers and Free Speech Lovers,
‘Someday, someone, somewhere, is going to break that silence and only then will we begin to hear the sounds of balanced media coverage finally rising above what Solzhenitsyn described as ‘the incessant dinning of slogans and dogmas that abolish the human essence and deny all individuality to man.’ Then, and only then, will the silence of the wolves begin to disperse as the clear light of a new day of freedom of speech dawns for all Canadians.’
RadialPress.com A screengrab from The Radial Press website.
RCMP Cpl. Catherine Galliford says she didn’t report the alleged abuse because she feared for her career. (CBC)