Freedom of Speech by Arthur Topham

Dear Free Speech Supporter,
To succinctly summarize the importance and meaning of freedom of speech is no small task. I have laboured on this short essay for many an hour trying to distil the essence down to where it might become 100% proof and with the light of a match burst into a flame of truth bright enough to expose the underlying deception that now exists in Canadian law with respect to this subject.
Please take the time to read it and ponder its implications and should the import of its plea hold meaning for you pass it along to others who you may feel could also benefit from reading it.
It was obviously written in my own defence but I’m hopeful that upon understanding all the implications of these unjust laws that you will be able to see the danger to all Canadians who value this crucial right.
Sincerely
Arthur Topham
Publisher & Editor
The Radical Press
‘Digging to the root of the issues since 1998’
Freedom of Speech
by Arthur Topham
‘There’s no such thing as ‘Hate Speech.’
You either have FREE speech or you don’t it’s that simple.’
~Anonymous

Were I able to stand as Norman Rockwell’s iconic American citizen once stood, expressing one of the four basic inherent freedoms of democracy, I would have the following to say about the subject of freedom of speech.
Foremost is the realization of the dual nature of subject. There are two components to freedom of speech that form the basis for all the myriad variations on the theme of communication; one is the freedom to lie and deceive (both oneself and others) and the second (the most critical) is the freedom to speak the truth. When the freedom to lie and deceive gains the upper hand and establishes itself as the only freedom allowed within a society it signals the eventual demise of the remainder of that society’s freedoms as well and the beginning of a process of mass self-deception, denial and decay eventually leading to enslavement to false ideals which, ultimately, must result in the final death and destruction of the affected society or nation.
The issue of whether or not people ought to have unlimited freedom to express whatever thoughts and opinions they may hold is, at this important juncture in humanity’s evolvement toward universal freedom and peaceful co-existence, of the utmost and fundamental importance and will determine whether or not we survive both as a species and as free and independent individuals.
While this may sound at first like a rather preposterous and pretentious pronouncement to make nonetheless it bears urgent consideration given the relative and recent turn of events over the past century; ones which have accelerated all the major components of a nation’s (and a planet’s) essential nature political, economic, social, cultural and environmental to such a degree of intensity that the world is now facing a global dilemma of such scale that at no other time in our collective past have we had to face the harsh, impending realities that presently lay before us.
The litany of lies and deception and the magnitude of malfeasance on the part of our governments, our judiciaries, our religious institutions, coupled with the calculated, criminal complicity of the corporations and media, has reached a zenith of decadence and delusion and unless, as a collectively conscious and united whole, we the people of planet Earth begin to openly analyze and question the root causes of our combined quandary we will soon lose the one key able to unlock the mystery of the dismal human predicament we now find ourselves in.
That key is the individual’s ability to express their thoughts and ideas freely and without fear on any conceivable subject. It is not hyperbolical to state that this freedom is akin to one’s right to breath the common air that surrounds the planet or drink the liquid element we call water without which our bodies quickly cease to function. It’s synonymous with our right to eat healthy, vital, life-giving food that nourishes and sustains our physical self rather than being forced to consume adulterated, genetically modified food substitutes that are proven causes of disease and deformity in all living entities. It is parallel with one’s right and freedom to light a fire on a cold winter’s night to keep themselves warm or to seek shade when the sun’s beneficent rays become too hot to handle. Freedom of speech is therefore quintessential to our emotional, mental and spiritual health and well-being and cannot be allowed to be infringed upon by any organized body, be they legislators or lobbyists, for whatever reasons they might conjure up in their defence.
There are those who would scoff at pronouncements such as these and counter with endless argumentation, pleading that restrictions upon a person’s right to freedom of expression are necessary for the greater good of the public at large, all the while rolling out their reasons why this and that particular aspect of speech is dangerous or harmful to certain segments of society and therefore ought to be seen as a necessary compromise in order to protect whatever minority group that might be affected by the opinions or thoughts of others which they deem inimical to the interests of the aforesaid group. That is all part of the process of freedom of speech and ought to remain sacrosanct even though it is a plea for restrictions. This same sort of argument against limiting freedom of speech also uses such ruses as ‘a person cannot be allowed to yell ‘fire’ inside a crowded theatre or room’ in a vain effort to lend credence to their seemingly innocuous arguments for restricting speech yet at the same time they refuse to acknowledge the beneficial results that often can result from a person who senses a grave danger in the body politic itself and yells ‘be aware!’ via whatever medium of expression is available to them, be it a soap box, a song, a newspaper, a book or the Internet.
Where such proposed limitations cease to have meaning or validity and become a threat to every citizen’s fundamental right to freedom of speech is when they advocate the imposition of criminal charges such as are contained in sec. 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Code and in sec. 319(2) of the Criminal Code of Canada. It is here that the metaphoric Rubicon of reason and common sense has been crossed and double-crossed and tyranny begins. It is here that all of our combined freedoms end and Orwell’s fiction becomes fact. Thus the necessity to rid Canadian jurisprudence of these dangerous, undemocratic ‘hate crime’ laws that benefit only specified minority interests and penalize the fundamental freedoms of the vast majority.
Such is the pressing predicament that restrictions on freedom of speech pose; not only for the person who tries to warn others of impending threats to their (and other’s) well being but for those who, unbeknownst to themselves, are being led into lifestyles or linear patterns of thinking that ultimately are not beneficial to the planet or its inhabitants.
As the quote above this article clearly states, we either have freedom of speech or we don’t. There is no in-between stage; no dead zone of arbitrary discernment; no no-man’s-land of equivocation; no bardo plane of intermediary bluff that can be exploited and manipulated to the detriment of this fundamental right of all people everywhere and used to justify its limitations. All our freedoms rest upon this one. Never forget it.

NOTE: The struggle to retain our inherent right to freedom of speech doesn’t come without costs both financially and otherwise. Out of necessity, I am forced to ask for financial assistance in this ongoing battle with the foreign interest censors who are determined to stop all freedom of expression in Canada.
Please help out with my upcoming Sec. 319(2) ‘Hate Propaganda’ trial in October by making a donation.
Donations can be made online via my GoGetFunding site located at http://gogetfunding.com/canadian-publisher-faces-jail-for-political-writings/ or else by sending cash, cheques or Money Orders to the following postal address.
Please make sure that any cheques or Money Orders are made out to Arthur Topham and sent to:
Arthur Topham
4633 Barkerville Highway
Quesnel, B.C.
V2J 6T8
Sincerely,
Arthur Topham

{ Comments are closed }

Radical Press Legal Update #8

Dear Supporters of Freedom of Speech,
January 3, 2013 was a good day in B.C. and across the nation for those who have taken up metaphorical arms in defence of Canada’s fundamental right to freedom of speech on the Internet.
Here in B.C. and out in Ontario those battling against the forces of media censorship and repression were, in both cases, successful in their efforts and thus, for once, I have only positive news to report.
I should preface this update with a short apology to some readers who were sent an alert yesterday indicating that I had unexpectedly been called to court. That was an error on my part due to some confusion arising from the previous bail hearing that took place on December 19, 2012 wherein I got the date for my next appearance mixed up. Call it a senior moment if you will. 🙂
During the last court appearance in December presiding Judge Church, after hearing arguments from both the Crown and Defence regarding the Crown’s rather strident and persistent effort to reimpose the original bail conditions that were placed on me by Cst. Terry Wilson of the BC HATE CRIME TEAM back on May 16, 2012, reserved her judgement on the issue until January 3, 2013.
My lawyer Doug Christie attended by telephone from Victoria, B.C. and I and my wife were in the Quesnel Court room at 1:30 p.m. to hear Judge Church’s decision.
The Judge first gave an overview of the Crown’s arguments and those of Defence lawyer Mr. Christie before presenting her own position on the issue. According to Judge Church the Crown’s basic argument was that while I had legally resumed publishing on RadicalPress.com on November 2, 2012 I was still publishing material that the Crown felt was of the same calibre as that originally complained of by Agent X and Agent Y of B’nai Brith Canada. To back up Crown’s argument Crown Council Jennifer Johnston had submitted to Judge Church on December 19, 2012 a couple of screen shots taken from the radicalpress.com website that had supposed controversial headings which CC Johnston felt were significant enough that they warranted reinstating the original draconian restrictions that Cst Terry Wilson had unilaterally saddled me with on the day of my arrest in May.
Having considered these apparently pithy examples of willful promotion of hatred against ‘people of the Jewish religion or ethnic group’ Judge Church went on to say that while the screen shots may have (as Crown was alleging), indicated an ‘undertone’ of hatred toward those of the Jewish faith, Crown had not gone so far as to state that the captured text was in fact hateful. Furthermore, Crown had not disclosed to Judge Church any additional corroborating information pertaining to the screen shots in question which Crown was alleging were displaying such sentiments and so, according to the Judge, she had no way of determining whether or not the screen shots or the accompanying articles were, in fact, contravening sec. 319(2) of the CC of Canada.
Judge Church then went on to review Defence council Doug Christie’s arguments which basically stated Crown was attempting to pre-judge the published materials before a trial was held to determine whether or not they were in truth a contravention of sec. 319(2). It was also established that I am, in fact, a publisher and that under Canada’s constitution I have the right to publish articles deemed to be of interest to the general public and until such time that said articles are proven in a court of law to have contravened Canada’s hate crime legislation that my right to publish should not be pre-emptively prohibited simply because of allegations of wrong doing by those who feel particular materials are wilfully promoting hatred toward an ethnic minority. Throughout the course of her comments the Judge referred to the cases cited by both Crown and Defence during the previous hearing on December 19, 2012.
Another issue that had come up on December 19, 2012 was that of Disclosure. The Crown had then argued that they were withholding disclosure from my attorney because of a breach of protocol that had occurred back in the summer when a confidential document released to Doug Christie was later found to have been posted on a third party website (FreeDominion.ca). The Judge went on to describe the event which had to do with what is called a ‘Warned Statement’ which was a digitally recorded conversation between myself and the arresting officer Cst Terry Wilson on the day of my arrest. The Crown alleged that the breach (committed by me due to ignorance of the nature of the document) posed a serious threat to the safety of the two complainants in the case and for that reason Crown had filed a further application demanding that my lawyer not provide me with any further disclosure because I might intentionally publish it or give it to someone else who might publish it and in the process endanger the complainants. CC Johnston had cited the case of the Basi-Virk Trial involving the BC Rail/BC Liberal government scandal as reasoning for her allegations.
The Judge then went on to state that the case law cited by Crown in fact dealt with examples where secondary parties who were testifying may have been at risk but that in my case it was information which I personally had given to Cst. Terry Wilson and was, as my lawyer had stated, not of the same nature and certainly did not pose any direct threat to either of the two individuals who had complained to the RCMP. As such the Judge did not feel that the Crown’s argument that Mr. Christie be restricted in sharing disclosure with me was valid.
Judge Church also considered Doug Christie’s counter argument that it would be an unreasonable and onerous position to be placed in were he not allowed to share the information in any disclosure with his client unless I was under his direct supervision given the fact that he was in Victoria and I was 700 km away in Quesnel. Mr. Christie had indicated on December 19, 2012 that he and his client would be more than willing to sign an undertaking prohibiting me from disclosing any further confidential information in order to insure that no such breach occurred a second time. The Judge was able to see the logic of Mr. Christie’s arguments while at the same time dismissing Crown’s position that the breach in question could have endangered the two complainants and went on to say that while she would not be imposing the two original conditions that prohibited me from publishing on radicalpress.com or writing articles for publication wherever I so chose she would be issuing an order that would make it illegal for me republish any further disclosure. At this point she also stating she would not impose upon Mr. Christie the condition that he be in attendance whenever disclosing confidential documents to me.
Having read out her decision regarding the matters at hand the Judge reinstated the new bail conditions and asked me if I understood them. I acknowledged that I did. As such here are the new bail conditions under which I am now to legally abide by:
CONDITION ONE: You shall keep the peace and be of good behaviour.
CONDITION TWO: You shall have no contact or communication, directly or indirectly, with Agent Y and Agent X except as follows: (a) while in attendance at court; (b) through legal counsel.
CONDITION THREE: You shall not possess any weapon as defined in Section 2 of the criminal Code except for purposes directly related to your employment.
CONDITION FOUR: You shall not distribute, circulate or share all or any part of the Crown disclosure material with any person or organization.
CONDITION FIVE: You shall not publish or post all or any part of the Crown disclosure material on any internet site that can be read by the general public.
Having listened to the conditions of the new undertaking and given my consent to obey them the Judge then concluded the hearing. My wife and I then went for coffee and returned later to the Court Registry office where the undertaking was waiting for my signature. After signing it and obtaining a copy we left the building.
Included in the new undertaking was a notice stating that I would appear in court on April 2, 2013 at 1:30 pm PT in Quesnel for the preliminary hearing.
For some unknown reason Crown Council Jennifer Johnston was absent from the court room and another assistant Crown Council was sitting in for her.
So by all indications it looks like I will finally have some temporary respite from all the legal machinations that have been occurring over the past three months and I can focus on raising funds and adding further information to radicalpress.com that will assist others in understanding both the importance of this case and why it is that Canadians must sit up and pay much more attention to what these foreign lobbyists are doing to wreck our inherent right to freedom of expression and censor any and debate that focuses on the criminal and racist actions of the state of Israel and its dangerous and supremacist ideology known as Zionism.

Sincerely

Arthur Topham
Publisher & Editor
The Radical Press
‘Digging to the root of the issues since 1998’

{ Comments are closed }

The Smell of Sulphur or Rising Up Against the Empire

[We can only thank God for strong men like Hugo Chavez who are willing and able to stand up to anti-Christs like GW Bush and both eloquently and forcefully, expose them for the charlatans and psychopaths that they truly are. This has got to be one of the best speeches that I have ever read. Pass it around, please! Ed.]
————————-
Rise Up Against the Empire
President Hugo Chavez, Address to the United Nations
09/19/06 ‘Information Clearing House’ — — Representatives of the governments of the world, good morning to all of you. First of all, I would like to invite you, very respectfully, to those who have not read this book, to read it.
Noam Chomsky, one of the most prestigious American and world intellectuals, Noam Chomsky, and this is one of his most recent books, ‘Hegemony or Survival: The Imperialist Strategy of the United States.’’ [Holds up book, waves it in front of General Assembly.] ‘It’s an excellent book to help us understand what has been happening in the world throughout the 20th century, and what’s happening now, and the greatest threat looming over our planet.
The hegemonic pretensions of the American empire are placing at risk the very survival of the human species. We continue to warn you about this danger and we appeal to the people of the United States and the world to halt this threat, which is like a sword hanging over our heads. I had considered reading from this book, but, for the sake of time,’ [flips through the pages, which are numerous] ‘I will just leave it as a recommendation.
It reads easily, it is a very good book, I’m sure Madame [President] you are familiar with it. It appears in English, in Russian, in Arabic, in German. I think that the first people who should read this book are our brothers and sisters in the United States, because their threat is right in their own house.
The devil is right at home. The devil, the devil himself, is right in the house.
‘And the devil came here yesterday. Yesterday the devil came here. Right here.’ [crosses himself] ‘And it smells of sulfur still today.
Yesterday, ladies and gentlemen, from this rostrum, the president of the United States, the gentleman to whom I refer as the devil, came here, talking as if he owned the world. Truly. As the owner of the world.
I think we could call a psychiatrist to analyze yesterday’s statement made by the president of the United States. As the spokesman of imperialism, he came to share his nostrums, to try to preserve the current pattern of domination, exploitation and pillage of the peoples of the world.
An Alfred Hitchcock movie could use it as a scenario. I would even propose a title: ‘The Devil’s Recipe.’
As Chomsky says here, clearly and in depth, the American empire is doing all it can to consolidate its system of domination. And we cannot allow them to do that. We cannot allow world dictatorship to be consolidated.
The world parent’s statement — cynical, hypocritical, full of this imperial hypocrisy from the need they have to control everything.
They say they want to impose a democratic model. But that’s their democratic model. It’s the false democracy of elites, and, I would say, a very original democracy that’s imposed by weapons and bombs and firing weapons.
What a strange democracy. Aristotle might not recognize it or others who are at the root of democracy.
What type of democracy do you impose with marines and bombs?
The president of the United States, yesterday, said to us, right here, in this room, and I’m quoting, ‘Anywhere you look, you hear extremists telling you can escape from poverty and recover your dignity through violence, terror and martyrdom.’
Wherever he looks, he sees extremists. And you, my brother — he looks at your color, and he says, oh, there’s an extremist. Evo Morales, the worthy president of Bolivia, looks like an extremist to him.
The imperialists see extremists everywhere. It’s not that we are extremists. It’s that the world is waking up. It’s waking up all over. And people are standing up.
I have the feeling, dear world dictator, that you are going to live the rest of your days as a nightmare because the rest of us are standing up, all those who are rising up against American imperialism, who are shouting for equality, for respect, for the sovereignty of nations.
Yes, you can call us extremists, but we are rising up against the empire, against the model of domination.
The president then — and this he said himself, he said: ‘I have come to speak directly to the populations in the Middle East, to tell them that my country wants peace.’
That’s true. If we walk in the streets of the Bronx, if we walk around New York, Washington, San Diego, in any city, San Antonio, San Francisco, and we ask individuals, the citizens of the United States, what does this country want? Does it want peace? They’ll say yes.
But the government doesn’t want peace. The government of the United States doesn’t want peace. It wants to exploit its system of exploitation, of pillage, of hegemony through war.
It wants peace. But what’s happening in Iraq? What happened in Lebanon? In Palestine? What’s happening? What’s happened over the last 100 years in Latin America and in the world? And now threatening Venezuela — new threats against Venezuela, against Iran?
He spoke to the people of Lebanon. Many of you, he said, have seen how your homes and communities were caught in the crossfire. How cynical can you get? What a capacity to lie shamefacedly. The bombs in Beirut with millimetric precision?
This is crossfire? He’s thinking of a western, when people would shoot from the hip and somebody would be caught in the crossfire.
This is imperialist, fascist, assassin, genocidal, the empire and Israel firing on the people of Palestine and Lebanon. That is what happened. And now we hear, ‘We’re suffering because we see homes destroyed.’
The president of the United States came to talk to the peoples — to the peoples of the world. He came to say — I brought some documents with me, because this morning I was reading some statements, and I see that he talked to the people of Afghanistan, the people of Lebanon, the people of Iran. And he addressed all these peoples directly.
And you can wonder, just as the president of the United States addresses those peoples of the world, what would those peoples of the world tell him if they were given the floor? What would they have to say?
And I think I have some inkling of what the peoples of the south, the oppressed people think. They would say, ‘Yankee imperialist, go home.’ I think that is what those people would say if they were given the microphone and if they could speak with one voice to the American imperialists.
And that is why, Madam President, my colleagues, my friends, last year we came here to this same hall as we have been doing for the past eight years, and we said something that has now been confirmed — fully, fully confirmed.
I don’t think anybody in this room could defend the system. Let’s accept — let’s be honest. The U.N. system, born after the Second World War, collapsed. It’s worthless.
Oh, yes, it’s good to bring us together once a year, see each other, make statements and prepare all kinds of long documents, and listen to good speeches, like Abel’s yesterday, or President Mullah’s . Yes, it’s good for that.
And there are a lot of speeches, and we’ve heard lots from the president of Sri Lanka, for instance, and the president of Chile.
But we, the assembly, have been turned into a merely deliberative organ. We have no power, no power to make any impact on the terrible situation in the world. And that is why Venezuela once again proposes, here, today, 20 September, that we re-establish the United Nations.
Last year, Madam, we made four modest proposals that we felt to be crucially important. We have to assume the responsibility our heads of state, our ambassadors, our representatives, and we have to discuss it.
The first is expansion, and Mullah talked about this yesterday right here. The Security Council, both as it has permanent and non-permanent categories, (inaudible) developing countries and LDCs must be given access as new permanent members. That’s step one.
Second, effective methods to address and resolve world conflicts, transparent decisions.
Point three, the immediate suppression — and that is something everyone’s calling for — of the anti-democratic mechanism known as the veto, the veto on decisions of the Security Council.
Let me give you a recent example. The immoral veto of the United States allowed the Israelis, with impunity, to destroy Lebanon. Right in front of all of us as we stood there watching, a resolution in the council was prevented.
Fourthly, we have to strengthen, as we’ve always said, the role and the powers of the secretary general of the United Nations.
Yesterday, the secretary general practically gave us his speech of farewell. And he recognized that over the last 10 years, things have just gotten more complicated; hunger, poverty, violence, human rights violations have just worsened. That is the tremendous consequence of the collapse of the United Nations system and American hegemonistic pretensions.
Madam, Venezuela a few years ago decided to wage this battle within the United Nations by recognizing the United Nations, as members of it that we are, and lending it our voice, our thinking.
Our voice is an independent voice to represent the dignity and the search for peace and the reformulation of the international system; to denounce persecution and aggression of hegemonistic forces on the planet.
This is how Venezuela has presented itself. Bolivar’s home has sought a nonpermanent seat on the Security Council.
Let’s see. Well, there’s been an open attack by the U.S. government, an immoral attack, to try and prevent Venezuela from being freely elected to a post in the Security Council.
The imperium is afraid of truth, is afraid of independent voices. It calls us extremists, but they are the extremists.
And I would like to thank all the countries that have kindly announced their support for Venezuela, even though the ballot is a secret one and there’s no need to announce things.
But since the imperium has attacked, openly, they strengthened the convictions of many countries. And their support strengthens us.
Mercosur, as a bloc, has expressed its support, our brothers in Mercosur. Venezuela, with Brazil, Argentina, Paraguay, Uruguay, is a full member of Mercosur.
And many other Latin American countries, CARICOM, Bolivia have expressed their support for Venezuela. The Arab League, the full Arab League has voiced its support. And I am immensely grateful to the Arab world, to our Arab brothers, our Caribbean brothers, the African Union. Almost all of Africa has expressed its support for Venezuela and countries such as Russia or China and many others.
I thank you all warmly on behalf of Venezuela, on behalf of our people, and on behalf of the truth, because Venezuela, with a seat on the Security Council, will be expressing not only Venezuela’s thoughts, but it will also be the voice of all the peoples of the world, and we will defend dignity and truth.
Over and above all of this, Madam President, I think there are reasons to be optimistic. A poet would have said ‘helplessly optimistic,’ because over and above the wars and the bombs and the aggressive and the preventive war and the destruction of entire peoples, one can see that a new era is dawning.
As Sylvia Rodriguez says, the era is giving birth to a heart. There are alternative ways of thinking. There are young people who think differently. And this has already been seen within the space of a mere decade. It was shown that the end of history was a totally false assumption, and the same was shown about Pax Americana and the establishment of the capitalist neo-liberal world. It has been shown, this system, to generate mere poverty. Who believes in it now?
What we now have to do is define the future of the world. Dawn is breaking out all over. You can see it in Africa and Europe and Latin America and Oceanea. I want to emphasize that optimistic vision.
We have to strengthen ourselves, our will to do battle, our awareness. We have to build a new and better world.
Venezuela joins that struggle, and that’s why we are threatened. The U.S. has already planned, financed and set in motion a coup in Venezuela, and it continues to support coup attempts in Venezuela and elsewhere.
President Michelle Bachelet reminded us just a moment ago of the horrendous assassination of the former foreign minister, Orlando Letelier.
And I would just add one thing: Those who perpetrated this crime are free. And that other event where an American citizen also died were American themselves. They were CIA killers, terrorists.
And we must recall in this room that in just a few days there will be another anniversary. Thirty years will have passed from this other horrendous terrorist attack on the Cuban plane, where 73 innocents died, a Cubana de Aviacion airliner.
And where is the biggest terrorist of this continent who took the responsibility for blowing up the plane? He spent a few years in jail in Venezuela. Thanks to CIA and then government officials, he was allowed to escape, and he lives here in this country, protected by the government.
And he was convicted. He has confessed to his crime. But the U.S. government has double standards. It protects terrorism when it wants to.
And this is to say that Venezuela is fully committed to combating terrorism and violence. And we are one of the people who are fighting for peace.
Luis Posada Carriles is the name of that terrorist who is protected here. And other tremendously corrupt people who escaped from Venezuela are also living here under protection: a group that bombed various embassies, that assassinated people during the coup. They kidnapped me and they were going to kill me, but I think God reached down and our people came out into the streets and the army was too, and so I’m here today.
But these people who led that coup are here today in this country protected by the American government. And I accuse the American government of protecting terrorists and of having a completely cynical discourse.
We mentioned Cuba. Yes, we were just there a few days ago. We just came from there happily.
And there you see another era born. The Summit of the 15, the Summit of the Nonaligned, adopted a historic resolution. This is the outcome document. Don’t worry, I’m not going to read it.
But you have a whole set of resolutions here that were adopted after open debate in a transparent matter — more than 50 heads of state. Havana was the capital of the south for a few weeks, and we have now launched, once again, the group of the nonaligned with new momentum.
And if there is anything I could ask all of you here, my companions, my brothers and sisters, it is to please lend your good will to lend momentum to the Nonaligned Movement for the birth of the new era, to prevent hegemony and prevent further advances of imperialism.
And as you know, Fidel Castro is the president of the nonaligned for the next three years, and we can trust him to lead the charge very efficiently.
Unfortunately they thought, ‘Oh, Fidel was going to die.’ But they’re going to be disappointed because he didn’t. And he’s not only alive, he’s back in his green fatigues, and he’s now presiding the nonaligned.
So, my dear colleagues, Madam President, a new, strong movement has been born, a movement of the south. We are men and women of the south.
With this document, with these ideas, with these criticisms, I’m now closing my file. I’m taking the book with me. And, don’t forget, I’m recommending it very warmly and very humbly to all of you.
We want ideas to save our planet, to save the planet from the imperialist threat. And hopefully in this very century, in not too long a time, we will see this, we will see this new era, and for our children and our grandchildren a world of peace based on the fundamental principles of the United Nations, but a renewed United Nations.
And maybe we have to change location. Maybe we have to put the United Nations somewhere else; maybe a city of the south. We’ve proposed Venezuela.
You know that my personal doctor had to stay in the plane. The chief of security had to be left in a locked plane. Neither of these gentlemen was allowed to arrive and attend the U.N. meeting. This is another abuse and another abuse of power on the part of the Devil. It smells of sulfur here, but God is with us and I embrace you all.
May God bless us all. Good day to you.

{ Comments are closed }

Light Bringer or Faallen Angel? Sorcha Faal, the Jews, the Nazis, the West and the Zionist Challenge

[Editor’s Note: This is necessarily a very long article as it deals with an important issue the possible deception of many Western readers by the Russian author and internet publisher, Sorcha Faal. Feedback is invited. Ed.]
————
Light Bringer or Faallen Angel?
Sorcha Faal, the Jews, the Nazis, the West and the Zionist Challenge
By Arthur Topham
Pub/Ed
The Radical Press
[email protected]
Sept. 17, 2006

Light Bringer or Faallen Angel? Sorcha Faal, the Jews, the Nazis, the West and the Zionist Challenge


And as reported to her Eastern and Western Subscribers
A critique of Sorcha Faal’s September 9, 2006 article, ‘For Western Jews: The Time Has Come To Start Thinking About The Unthinkable’ http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index947.htm
‘A sense of evil things stirring in dark places, like the sounds which a prisoner in a dungeon awaits at night, disquietened men and nations.’ from The Controversy of Zion, Douglas Reed
‘The Judaic Communist epoch of mass murder has disappeared into history in one of the great vanishing acts of all time. Only practiced deceivers, with all the sleight of hand of the most accomplished stage magicians, could pull off such a coup against the rest of humanity. To trick mankind into focusing nearly all expiatory sentiment, monuments and commemoration on Judaic victims and brand the Mark of Cainthe very words war crime and holocaust itselfon Germany and upon Germans alone as their proprietary trademark, must be regarded as one of the most masterful achievements of psychological warfare in the annals of illusion.’ from The Documentary Record, Michael A. Hoffman II
‘Oh, East is East, and West is West, and never the twain shall meet,
Till Earth and Sky stand presently at God’s great Judgment seat;’
from The Ballad of East and West, Rudyard Kipling
Ever since Sorcha Faal’s star began rising in the Cyberian firmament my intuition has consistently cautioned me that something was amiss in her writings; something not easily grasped nor easily delineated, yet still…something that continually gnawed upon my sense of logical proportion and something that refused to fit smoothly into my overall gestalt, like a persistent itch that, for all one’s apparent outward comfort, constantly reminds one that the universe is not in total synch.
I kept asking myself: Is it just something that got lost in translation or possibly an error in my judgment based on a perceived sense of bombast or hyperbole or possibly even hubris in Faal’s writing? Or were all those doubts but intimations of something deeper, more subtle; something, possibly, concealing a hidden, agenda? If so, I thought, whatever that agenda might be, it appears to surface fully and consistently throughout this latest and most startling installment of Faal’s work.
Having had a strong intent to fathom the deeper mysteries of Political Zionism for some time now, Sorcha’s article became a catalyst for me to set out on a mental mission of reconnaissance to hopefully ascertain the meaning hidden within her cryptic phraseology and morbid forebodings. And so with my trusty 6th sense slung over my shoulder I set out to dissect the article in detail and scout its subterranean contours in order to shine some light into what appeared to me to be dark bunkers of surreptitious, half-truths designed not only to confuse and instill fear into Western Jews but to actually destabilize the minds of her ‘western readers’.
Throughout this gleaning process I discovered the whole article to be permeated with convoluted confessions of double-think that I’m certain would have made even George Orwell’s mind do a double-back flip!
Blithely quoting, in her opening remarks, some rather esoteric statement of Tolstoy’s regarding the origins of the Judaic religion Faal immediately breaks into a familiar refrain about the historic woes of the Jews and their never-ending plight wherein they consistently end up enraging every other nation in the world to the point where they become ‘besieged’ and harassed over and over again.
Then, following directly on the iron heels of this alleged eternal assault upon these innocent, downtrodden people, comes the immediate, and inevitable connection with good old scapegoat standby, ‘dark and evil’ Nazi Germany and its supposed ‘final solution’ to this recurring Jewish ‘coincidence’ which both East and West has been conditioned for well over a century now to call the ‘anti-Semitic’, ‘racist’, reactionary response to whatever these people are doing that tends to always culminate in an irksome crescendo of violence and hatred directed toward them.
Preliminary research
From the research I’ve done over the past few years on the subject, the ploy of first creating and then blaming others for this phenomenon has always been the hallmark of Political Zionism, a philosophy that first congealed into a semblance of form toward the end of the 19th Century. (Germany, for those who have delved into the subject in great depth, symbolizes the epitome of this idea.) Gauging, then using, whatever anger these seemingly innocuous Jews engender in the Gentile populations as a pretext for crying ‘anti-Semite Wolf! anti-Semite Wolf!’ has become, for over a century now, the Zionist’s trump card. It’s a Talisman which they hang about their collective necks in order to ward off any bad spirits (critics) who might question or call them to task for their political or amoral actions in the sphere of national and international politics and economics. As well, it’s also used for gaining sympathy from, subservience to and support of the Western world, for the ultimate of manifest destinies, the Zionist/Jewish agenda; one which is now recognized by most aware students of contemporary history as a covert plot to gain full-spectrum, spiritual, psychological, political, economic and military dominance over all the world’s sovereign nations via the incremental creation of an International, super state under the direct auspices of the United Nations Organization.
As I write I am looking at the Front Page headlines of the March 24th, 1933 edition of the British newspaper the Daily Express. The bold headline reads: ‘JUDEA DECLARES WAR ON GERMANY’. The ink on the Enabling Act of March 23rd, which had given Hitler the legal, constitutional right to rule Germany, had barely had the chance to dry before World Jewry openly declared war on the German nation via its global boycott of German products. That declaration of war, as far as I can tell, is still in effect today making Jewry’s attack on that nation one of the longest, if not the longest, sustained assaults in recorded history.
It is my conviction that Germany, upon its defeat in 1945, was set up by the Zionists to become the whipping boy and the International scapegoat to justify whatever actions the Jewish Financial cabal (Zionism) happened to decide upon. The test of time has proven this thesis and I now firmly believe that it is incumbent upon professional journalists, historians and writers in general to get their acts together and realize they’ve been scammed for close to 75 years and start looking for new or different metaphors to symbolize the emerging truths that are finally being exposed via the internet and printed publications.
A query for Sorcha
On Sept 6, 2006 I wrote to Sorcha Faal to complain about this very thing after reading in her article ‘Nuclear Storm Gathers As United States Heartland Plunges Into ‘Dust Bowl’ Condition’ the following:
‘As more of their resistance leaders are imprisoned in their vast Gulag, it is shocking to hear reports from America that echo those of the German peoples caught under the brutal Nazi Regime, and who likewise, and until the devastating end of their Nation during World War II, lived in total denial of what they had become and the true character of the evil monsters who ruled them.’
In my email I wrote, ‘I would have thought that you would use the analogy of your own Soviet Gulag rather than continually flogging that dead horse Nazi Germany. It seems that Germany is always the whipping boy when it comes to brutality. Maybe you ought to revisit Aleksandr I. Solzhenitsyn and the Solovesky Islands and Kolyma and the canals, et cetera and employ that analogy and those monsters. Or is it because of your own shame and pretense that you refuse to do so?’
In response I received a reply from Sorcha Faal’s webmaster ‘Brian’ in Paris who wrote:
‘The comparison of the current state of the United States with the past regime of the Nazi Germany’s is indeed a valid one due to the nature of the fascist elements employed by each of these governments.
‘The definition of a fascist is one who is dictatorial or has extreme right-wing views, as opposed to a communist who espouses left-wing views.
‘Fascism is likewise defined as a governmental system led by a dictator having complete power, forcibly suppressing opposition and criticism, regimenting all industry, commerce, etc., and emphasizing an aggressive nationalism and often racism.’
As I read through these lines from Brian my mind flashed back and beyond and between the words to the other 9-11 that occurred on 11-7, 1917 when the Bolsheviks gained control of the Russian nation-state and proclaimed their revolution and their dictatorship over the proletariat.
I began reflecting on Lenin and how within only months of gaining political control of the vast Russian empire his Bolshevik regime was already forging the chains of slavery and planning the killing of millions of Russians and Ukrainians and a host of other ethnic groupings throughout the former empire.
These were the unwilling sections of the ‘proletariat’ who, likely for the same reasons that people like myself distrust the Zionist-controlled governments of the West and East today, didn’t buy into the Bolshevik baloney about collectives and land reform and people’s soviets because what they were seeing then, just as what we’re seeing now, is not anything related to the founding principles of socialist democracy as formulated by originators like Proudon and Godwin and Michael Bakunin. What the Bolsheviks had in store for the gullible goyim of greater Russia was nothing less than complete despotic domination and dictatorship combined with the seething and relentless wrath of their Judaic god of revenge and destruction.
What these ‘counter-revolutionaries’, as the Bolsheviks called them, quickly realized was that they were at the mercy not of a new democratically-oriented Russian governing body but of a political regime formulated, financed and run with deadly, sinister, premeditated purpose by mostly Western Zionist/Jewish International Financiers who had a layaway plan for the Gentile Christians that stretched far beyond the pale of their initial Marxist rhetoric.
The Who’s Who of Russian Communism
For all their efforts to conceal this grand design behind the Zionist revolutionary coup history was kind enough to leave future investigators some rare but documented proof of who the instigators were. Fortunate for us all, in today’s trying times, was the fact that an Englishman by the name of Mr. Robert Wilton, who was living in Russia during the actual Revolution and working as a correspondent for the London Times, had the foresight to record in a book the following information regarding the official make up of the leading members of the Bolshevik party.
According to these documented records, ‘the Central Committee of the Bolshevik party, which wielded the supreme power, contained 3 Russians (including Lenin [There is now evidence that he too was of Jewish descent A.T.]) and 9 Jews. The next body in importance, the Central Committee of the Executive Commission (or secret police) comprised 42 Jews and 19 Russians, Letts, Georgians and others. The Council of People’s Commissars consisted of 17 Jews and five others. The Moscow Cheka (secret police) was formed of 23 Jews and 13 others. Among the names of 556 high officials of the Bolshevik state officially published in 1918-1919, were 458 Jews and 108 others. Among the central committees of small, supposedly ‘Socialist’ or other non-Communist parties (during that early period the semblance of ‘opposition’ was permitted, to beguile the masses, accustomed under the Czar to opposition parties) were 55 Jews and 6 others. All the names are given in the original documents reproduced by Mr. Wilton…. [1]
These startling ratios of Jews to Russians also brought to mind the Gulag Archipelago that Solzhenitsyn wrote about in such brutal grandeur and sensitivity to detail. Names began to drift upward before my mind’s eye like ghostly spectres ‘Genrikh Yagoda: chief of Soviet Secret Police, mass murderer extraordinaire who also oversaw the destructive slave labour concentration camps. Leon Bronstein (Trotsky): supreme commander of the Soviet Red Army [who double-crossed and murdered his Anarchist allies in the army of Nestor Mahkno A.T.]. Grigory Apfelbaum (Zinoviev): executive, Soviet Secret Police. Solomon Lozovsky: deputy Soviet foreign minister. Maxim Wallach (Litvinov): Soviet foreign minister. Yuri Andropov: director, Soviet KGB, later supreme dictator of the Soviet Union.
‘Jacob Sverdlov: first president of the Soviet Union. Sverdlov ordered the massacre of the Czar’s familywomen and childrenin the town named after Catherine the Great, Yekaterinburg, (renamed Sverdlovsk in 1924 in honor of the murderer).
‘Jacob Yurovsky: commander, Soviet Secret Police. Yurovsky led the death squad which carried out Sverdlov’s order for the murder of the Czar’s family, including the bayoneting to death of the Czar’s daughters.
‘Lazar Moiseyevich Kaganovich: chief mass murderer for Stalin, ordered the deaths of millions and the wholesale destruction of Christian monuments and churches, including the great Cathedral of Christ the Savior.
‘Mikhail Kaganovich: deputy commissar of heavy industry, supervisor of slave labor, brother of Lazar. Rosa Kaganovich: Stalin’s mistress; sister of Lazar. Paulina Zhemchuzina: member of the Central Committee and wife of Soviet Foreign Minister Molotov. Olga Bronstein: officer, Soviet Cheka Secret Police, sister of Trotsky, wife of Kamenev.
‘Matvei Berman and Naftaly Frenkel: founders, the Gulag death camp system.
‘Lev Inzhir, commissar for Soviet death camp transit and administration. Boris Berman: executive officer of the Soviet Secret Police and brother of Matvei. K.V. Pauker: chief of operations, Soviet NKVD Secret Police [forerunner of the KGB. A.T.].
‘Firin, Rappoport, Kogan, Zhuk: commissars of death camps and slave labor, supervised the mass deaths of labourers during the construction of the White SeaBaltic Canal.
‘M.I. Gay: commander, Soviet Secret Police. Slutsky and Shpiegelglas: commanders, Soviet Secret Police. Isaac Babel: officer, Soviet Secret Police.
‘Leiba Lazarevich Feldbin (Aleksandr Orlov): commander, Soviet Red Army; officer, Soviet Secret Police. Feldbin was chief of Soviet Security in the Spanish Civil War. He supervised the massacre of Catholic priests and peasants in Spain.
‘Yona Yakir: general, Soviet Red Army, member of the Central Committee. Dimitri Shmidt: general, Soviet Red Army. Yakov (’Yankel’) Kreiser: general, Soviet Red Army. Miron Vovsi: general, Soviet Red Army.
‘David Dragonsky: general, Soviet Red Army, Hero of the Soviet Union. Grigori Shtern: general, Soviet Red Army. Mikhail Chazkelevich: general, Soviet Red Army. Shimon Kirvoshein: general, Soviet Red Army. Arseni Raskin: deputy-commander, Soviet Red Army. Haim Fomin, commander of Brest-Litovsk, Soviet Red Army.
‘Sergei Eisenstein: director of communist propaganda films which depicted Christian peasants (kulaks) as hideous, money-grabbing parasites. The kulaks were subsequently massacred. (Cf. for example Eisenstein’s Bezhin Meadow).
‘Ilya Ehrenburg, Minister of Soviet Propaganda and disseminator of anti-German hate material dating from the 1930s. Ehrenburg instigated the Soviet Red Army rape and murder of German civilians. Referring to German women, Ehrenburg gloated to the advancing Red Army troops, ‘that blonde hag is in for a bad time.’’[2]
The one common denominator linking together all this spectral list of Bolshevik characters (and please remember, dear reader of East and West, that this is but a short list) who dealt death and destruction and human misery to what may conservatively be stated as somewhere in the vicinity of 66,000,000 (yes, that’s million folks) human beings, mostly Christian, is that all these power-crazed, psychopathic, mass-murderers were Bolshevik Jews originally from Eastern European origins and having their roots buried deep in the Ashkenazi past.
And this is a reality that Sorchal Faal appears to conveniently overlook or forget when she goes on and on about how terrible and brutal those Nazi ‘evil monsters’ were. One need only pause for a moment and consider the magnitude of misery that these Bolshevik Jews inflicted upon a nation of unwary Christian peasants and ill-informed bourgeoisie to realize that the so-called Communists (in truth Bolshevik/Zionist Jews) represented a much greater threat to world peace and security than what Nazi Germany ever did.
So in the spirit of cooperative exchange I might humbly suggest to writers such as Sorcha that they start employing some of the novel names listed above rather than always resorting to those worn-out appellations: Hitler, Goebbels, Goering, Himmler, and Ribbentrop, et al whenever they’re searching out succulent similes to knit together their sweaters of self-righteous similitude.
A moment’s pause
(Lest readers begin assuming too much in my protestations regarding this issue allow me to pause a moment and state clearly that I am not of Germanic descent and thus hold no particular grudges based upon that fact. Like most Canadian boys born just after the war I grew up with my fair share of Cointelpro propaganda regarding the nasty Nazis and the slant-eyed ‘Japs’ contained in the Jewish-owned publications that flooded the market with their ‘Sergeant Rock’ and ‘GI Joe’, etc. war comics from the 1940s onward.)
Before Hitler had even assumed leadership of the German government (via free, democratic election) the Bolsheviks under Lenin and Stalin, for over 15 years by that point, had been perpetrating upon countless millions of Russian and Ukrainian peasants and bourgeoisie the most massive ‘Christian Holocaust’ ever known to humankind.
The order, signed by Stalin’s bloodstained hand, that condemned somewhere between 7 to 15 million Ukrainians to premeditated murder by starvation and bullets, not to mention the millions more who had already died from starvation, freezing and exhaustive labour in the concentration/labour camps of the Communist gulag, therefore flies in the face of these accusations by Sorchal Faal of Nazi brutality and monstrous deeds beyond compare.
I have no doubts about whether cruel atrocities took place during the Nazi occupation of foreign nations during the war and that individuals performed despicable acts on par with those committed by the Bolsheviks [At this point (March, 2014 I have changed my position on the initial statement made in this paragraph. A.T.] but to hang the yoke of International guilt around the necks of only the Germans is the height of hypocrisy for every nation at war commits such acts at one time or another and in the case of the Soviets the magnitude and severity of these crimes against humanity far outweigh any similar acts by Germany. The fact too that it has been the consistent, relentless hammering of this theme into the minds of Westerners and Easterners by the Zionist-owned media ought to ring a bell within every open and inquisitive mind that understands this process of mind manipulation.
Back to the life of Brian
When Brian, in his reply, stated that a fascist is ‘one who is dictatorial or has extreme right-wing views, as opposed to a communist who espouses left-wing views’ can this possibly be meant to exclude the likes of Lenin and Stalin and their Jewish taskmasters merely because they were ‘left-wing’?
Is the ‘left-wing’ of an American F-16 fighter plane carrying cluster bombs and missiles any less responsible for the carnage than the right? Are we to believe that these dictators over the proletariat, who signed death warrants for millions of innocent individuals, didn’t hold ‘extreme right-wing views’ because they were ‘left-wing’ Communists and not the dreaded Western Capitalists? If that is the intent of Sorcha’s statements then this can only be construed as sophistry, written for some, as yet, unknown reason.
Furthermore, if, as Brian went on to state, ‘Fascism is likewise defined as a governmental system led by a dictator having complete power, forcibly suppressing opposition and criticism, regimenting all industry, commerce, etc., and emphasizing an aggressive nationalism and often racism’ and this definition doesn’t also fit the Stalinist/Zionist-controlled dictatorship of the former U.S.S.R. then I’m a monkey’s uncle and the Solovesky Islands were always just a quiet, northern hermitage for contemplative Christian monks and never the nascent beginnings of a concatenation of slaughter that make even the devastations of the Judaic Deuteronomy appear faint-hearted by comparison.
Had Brian somewhere introduced the corporate factor into his equation it might possibly have held some water but the description he applies to the Nazis, surely and more aptly, fits Stalin’s Zionist Jewish-run, totalitarian regime to a tee.
And so it seems that Sorcha Faal is trying to ignore the Jewish/Zionist factor that would have her come to terms with her own country’s dark past, choosing instead to deflect the events of today’s Zionists onto Nazi Germany and the unwary West.
Enter the bicephalous monster
Another link that appears to be missing in Sorcha’s chain of reasoning is the fact that when the Judaic-led Bolsheviks were storming the winter palace of Nicholas II in November of 1917 the self-same clique of Jewish Zionists in the West, then led by the formidable Dr. Chaim Weizmann, head of the World Zionist Organization, was working overtime to ensure that Mr. Arthur Belfour, in conjunction with US President Wilson, would agree to the British declaration of ‘a national home’ for the Jews in then-occupied British Palestine.
This was the same Arthur Belfour who, as Prime Minister of England, had already met with Dr. Weizmann in a London hotel back in 1904 to discuss the Palestine issue. That agreement, known to future generations as the Balfour Declaration, was signed and sealed by Balfour and ostensibly sent in a letter to Lord Rothschild in November of 1917 (although it was actually handed directly to Dr. Weizmann) during the same week that the Bolshevik takeover occurred in the East.
Now was that coincidence or conspiracy Sorcha?
Douglas Reed, the former British war correspondent for the London Times, in his remarkable study of Political Zionism, The Controversy of Zion, http://www.radicalpress.com/?page_id=1026 had the following precocious observations to make regarding these two apparently coincidental and momentous historic events and the hidden influences that had precipitated their simultaneous occurrence. Writing in 1955 Reed states, ‘The conclusion cannot be escaped: …From this period in 1916-1917 the decay of parliamentary and representative government can be traced, both in England and America. If secret men [Dr. Weizmann and his Zionist cohorts in the USA and Britain and elsewhere A.T.] could dictate major acts of American state policy and major operations of British armies, then clearly ‘election’ and ‘responsible office’ were terms devoid of meaning. Party distinctions began to fade in both countries, once this hidden, supreme authority was accepted by leading Western politicians, and the American and British electors began to be deprived of all true choice. Today this condition is general, and now is public. Leaders of all parties, before elections, make obeisance to Zionism, and the voter’s selection of president, prime minister or party makes no true difference.
‘In November 1917 the American Republic thus became equally involved with Great Britain in Zionism, which has proved to be a destructive force…. In the very week of the Balfour Declaration the other group of Jews in Russia achieved their aim, the destruction of the Russian nation-state. The Western politicians thus bred a bicephalous monster, one head being the power of Zionism in the Western capitals, and the other the power of Communism advancing from captive Russia. Submission to Zionism weakened the power of the West to preserve itself against the world-revolution, for Zionism worked to keep Western governments submissive and to deflect their policies from national interests; indeed, at that instant the cry was first raised that opposition to the world-revolution, too, was ‘anti-semitism’. Governments hampered by secret capitulations in any one direction cannot act firmly in any other, and the timidity of London and Washington in their dealings with the world-revolution, during the four decades to follow, evidently derived from their initial submission to ‘the web of intrigue’ spun across the Atlantic between 1914 and 1917 [by the Zionists A.T.]
‘After 1917, therefore, the question which the remainder of the 20th Century had to answer was whether the West could yet find in itself the strength to break free, or pry its political leaders loose, from this double thrall.’[3]
Back to the present
From the onset of Sorcha’s article there is a very threatening and ominous message being given out to Western Jews. When she states that ‘the Jewish peoples of the Western World fail to see the rising hatred, like a giant destructive wave, ready to engulf them’ she conveys a message couched in a foreboding tone of language. Is it merely that she fears for the blowback when increasing numbers of Westerners finally realize that they’ve been had by the Zionist forces? Or is it something more than just a passing pretense of concern?
Why, for example, state that the ‘ancestors and prophets’ of the Jews of today have condemned them to remain isolated and disconnected forever from the world family and that they are never to experience peace on Earth but only to be ‘the stone upon which the entire power of this World will be crushed’?
What is such a Sphinx-like forecast supposed to mean? Are we expected, because of it, to assume that the ‘power of this World’ is not therefore Jewish in origin but something else? And if so, then who, pray tell, is wielding all this economic and political influence over nation-states and controlling and disseminating all the destructive, hate-filled propaganda directed at the Nazis and the Arabs that’s carried into our homes and minds every day and night of the week?
Are we to suddenly shift our thinking elsewhere and give credence instead to the Icke reptiles or Makow’s Illuminati or the Freemasons or some of the other shady groups of secondary criminals like the Council on Foreign Relations or the Bilderbergers or the Committee of 300, or just a bad U.S. Administration, et al instead? We’re left to figure that one out on our own it seems.
Consideration given to all that’s been said about who were the initial progenitors of the concentration camps that acted as ‘slaughter pens’ for the millions of Russians and Ukrainians, it makes Faal’s following statement, ‘…but for the want of true eyes to see they [the Jews A.T.] would begin their exodus from the Western Nations before their fate is taken out of their hands, to be put once more into those who control the concentration camps and slaughter pens being built for them even as these very words are being written’ appear all the more incredulous. Just where is Sorcha suggesting that these millions of Jews, now mainly living in the West, flee to? Israel? Russia? England? Tibet? Timbuktu? Again she is silent in that regard as well as in identifying precisely who it is that is supposedly constructing these camps.
Down to the nitty gritty
After reading and rereading Faal’s article and closely examining paragraph after paragraph, nowhere could I find mention of exactly why these poor, maligned souls are forever ending up with the fecal-fouled end of the stick in their hands when it comes to public outcries by Gentiles against the treachery and underlying power of this mendacious, Zionist influence throughout Western civilization. Allow me to cite and comment upon the most blatant examples of what I mean.
Faal writes, ‘Listen to the cries of these Jewish peoples in the Western World today though: ‘We are bankers!’ ‘We are diplomats!’ ‘We are owners of industry!’ ‘We are powerful!’ ‘We are artists!’ ‘We are politicians!’ ‘We own newspapers!’
Now what sort of nonsense is this? The opposite is more the reality. Jews in the West have invariably used their vise-like control of the media and their financial clout and associated lobbying influence to hide these supposed ‘cries’ of Sorcha’s from the eyes and ears of the general public. I, for one, have been trying for decades to bring the subject of Jewish power and control of the media to the public’s attention and consistently face vituperation and slander whenever I do so. Is Sorcha actually suggesting that the Zionist Jews react this way because they want people to know of their hidden power? As David Icke would say, ‘Not bloody likely mate!’
The Jews within the Zionist circle do their utmost to conceal their power from the people. That is the purpose of their organizations like the B’nai B’rith, the Anti-Defamation League, the Simon Wiesenthal Centre and the raison d’etre for their ubiquitous financial control over judiciaries within Western governments, so as to ensure that their ‘anti-Semitism’ and ‘racism’ and ‘hatred’ and alleged ‘Jewish Holocaust’ weapons remain sharp as razors and their purpose as impervious to the light of day as the proverbial Dark Holes of outer space. Just ask Canadian publisher and pacifist Ernst Zundel or British Historian David Irving or Germar Rudolf the Revisionist and others if this isn’t so, all of whom are stagnating in Zionist-controlled German prison cells for even thinking contrary to the Zionist Jewish Doctrine.
Faal then goes on to bemoan the Western Jews’ apparently perilous predicament and projects puzzlement that somehow they don’t, as she says, ‘heed our warnings while the time remained for them to escape to freedom from total destruction.’ Again, this begs the question, escape to where? To ‘freedom’? And where on God’s green acre is that place to be found in this day and age?!! Where, outside the ken of Zionist influence, would all these imperiled Jews flee to? Again, only silence.
Next comes a paragraph wherein Sorcha emphatically states, ‘It would be too simplistic to say that their thoughts are borne of arrogance, but much truer to say that their fate has been manipulated, and in such a way as to be able to show to the World that the only obstacle to World Peace that remains today, and as it has always been said, are the Jewish people.’
Here we enter a labyrinthine world of innuendo and double meaning. First Faal suggests that the Jews’ open ‘cries’ to the world, telling of their power and influence and importance (something false to begin with) must not be misconstrued as simply ‘arrogance’ and that their ‘fate’ is somehow being manipulated by an alien force or power in order to portray them as the one obstacle to world peace so that they ultimately become the prophesied scapegoat when the proverbial shyte hits the fan in the West.
Now what are we to make of that? Are we to again backtrack to square one and begin doubting whether or not the Jews have actually played any role at all in this massive deception? Are we to cast aside centuries of evidence to the contrary and begin anew with the novel idea that this cartel of International Financiers, composed initially of the Jewish Rothschild family and their inner cabal of conniving cohorts, are not to be associated in any way with the lives, the religion, the motivations and the tacit support given by many throughout the Jewish Diaspora globally to the actions of Israel and the present-day Zionist-controlled Western governments? Presumably that is what Sorcha is suggesting.
Then comes more confusion in the following, ‘What will never be allowed for the Western people to know, however, is that the Jewish people are not now, nor have never been, a single people, but like every race and religion in the World is one driven with internal strife, political alliances and sectarian violence. Such division in fact is there that tens of thousands of Jewish people do not even acknowledge the State of Israel, thousands more in Israel itself continually denounce those less devout then they believe themselves to be but to these truths the Western World does not want to know, indeed does not care to know.’
In one breath Sorcha tells us that people in the West will ‘never be allowed’ to know that there are Ashkenazi Jews of Eastern European origins who are genetically non-Semitic and make up the vast majority of Jews in the USA, Canada and Great Britain and Europe and that many of them don’t support the Zionist policies of the Israeli State and in a second breath, without explaining who it is that won’t grant us this knowledge, she suddenly exclaims that the Western world doesn’t want or even care to know! Now that is a bit of knavish nonsense if I do say so. First you aren’t allowed to know something and then, because you aren’t privy to it, the assumption is made that you really didn’t want to know in the first place. As my Jewish Mother-in-law would likely have said, ‘Oy veh, such logic!’
Now we’re dazzled with another presumption contained in her judgment, ‘There must be no mistake in understanding that the actions of the United States, its Western Allies, and its traitors in Israel, have at their central core of action, and belief, the complete destruction of not only Israel, but also that of the Jewish people as a whole.’
This assertion requires further mental contortions in order to maneuver to some kind of an understanding. Who are the ‘traitors in Israel’? Are they the leaders of the democratically elected parties who run the Jewish state? Are these very same people who have worked for over a hundred years now to establish this ‘homeland’ for the Jews and who have been slaughtering the Arab population and stealing their lands for just as long, if not longer, now to be seen in a new light? One in which their primary purpose is to destroy not only themselves but all the Jewish people? Again, all this slight of keyboard begs the question: What is Sorcha trying to say?
To complete this ponderous paragraph Faal says that the Western Power’s efforts to support and protect the Jewish peoples are combined somehow (again, never explained) with ‘constant reporting’ of the Jew’s ‘economic power’ and this phenomenon will very soon lead to their destruction. Again, wrapped in enigmatic language and based upon a false assumption Sorcha leaves her Western reader in a further state of puzzlement.
Now I can’t vouch for what the folks in Russia are smoking these days but my own experience in Canada and from all that I can glean from the many US and British websites and blogs where I get much input, the only place that people in the West can access this information concerning the Jew’s influence and economic power is on the net and in the miniscule number of texts still available in a small number of independent bookshops. Try asking in a mainstream media outlet about Jewish spheres of influence and you will be slammed hard with accusations of ‘anti-Semitic’ and ‘racist’ behaviour.
Sorcha seems to be saying that all this disingenuous behaviour on the part of these ‘fascist’ Western governments is destined to end up in destruction of the Jews everywhere and that such policies will never lead to peace, yet for all that it appears to me that this is just more subterfuge on her part designed to introduce complexities of diametrically opposed factors into an equation fraught with irreconcilable faults from the beginning. Surely she should know that the truth about who is pulling the strings of governments around the world is the first requisite for dealing with the effects that these tyrants have had upon the planetary body politic. Had she said that revealing the agenda of the Zionists will ultimately lead to the destruction of their one world government plan then that would hold some meaning but it doesn’t appear to be in keeping with whatever the purpose of this article really is.
Next, in a burst of Rooskie rhetoric, Faal entangles the minds of her Western readers in another knot of confusing opposites by suggesting that our ‘satanic masters’ (again, never named) have brainwashed us so much over the past couple of generations that this instilled hatred for the Jews has now even ‘carried over into Israel itself’ and that we’re seeing these results in the treatment of the present-day Lebanese people.
It boggles my mind upon reading such an inane statement as this that a person of Sorcha’s apparent stature could somehow overlook the degree of violence and racism that has been the very lifeblood of the Zionist State of Israel for the past 58 years and instead of seeing the recent Lebanese War as but a further incremental, planned attack upon the Arab population by the Jewish Zionists, ascribe all that death, suffering, and destruction to the average American’s or Canadian’s brainwashed perspective on the Jews.
Another Sorcha revelation comes with her statement that thousands of U.N. soldiers are pouring into Lebanon, not as she says, ‘for the protection of Israel against Hezbollah, but rather to begin the protection of the Arab World against Israel’. In other words we are expected to believe that these forces, acting under the auspices of the United Nations, an organization created by the Zionists in the first place in order to disarm and replace the national armies of sovereign states and become the new army of the Zionist’s one world government, are now being sent to the Middle East to act ‘against’ Israel! Now that, dear readers, is unabashed chutzpah of the first degree.
Further conundrums
Carrying the conundrum further she states that, ‘… in this final chapter of the Great Game, being played out upon the stage of the World, there remains only two options of peace; Either Israel is exterminated or over 1 Billion Muslims have to die which do YOU think is going to be allowed? Which do you believe will further the interests of those intent upon creating a One World Government?’
Well Sorcha, (now that you’ve asked) first off you present the options in such a confining context that they don’t allow for any reasonable conclusion other than the one you are suggesting; one which is based upon an initial set of erroneous assumptions. Granted the State of Israel has shown by example over the past 60 years that it has no legitimate or moral right to expect the rest of the world to acknowledge and accept it as a bone fide member of the world’s nations but this doesn’t necessarily imply that it must be ‘exterminated’. Such phraseology reeks of Zionese mind control and ‘Nazi death camp’ propaganda and only adds further doubt as to what your essay’s ultimate intention is. Should it become necessary to remove the Zionist Jews from Palestinian lands the Israel state could be peacefully dismantled just like the Berlin Wall was. Those Israelis who wished to remain in Palestine and live in real peace and harmony with the Arab people would likely be able to continue doing so and those with fervent, Zionist ambitions, imperialist in nature as any exhibited by the US government, could move unimpeded to the United States and Great Britain where they would surely be welcomed with open arms by the millions of Jewish and Christian Zionist brothers and sisters who have supported and encouraged them all along with US/British taxpayer money, monopoly media back up and endless military hardware. Now that is a third option which would avoid your sordid second choice and eliminate the need to murder an additional billion Arab people and in all likelihood save the American taxpayer billions of dollars.
I might also add that from all the signals in the heavens, (Cyberia, in this case) plus those upon solid ground, it appears to me that it is the Zionist Jews who are the actual one world government clique and their intention would obviously be to destroy the Arab goyim for that has always been their traditional modus operandi throughout history and one that also dovetails fully with the religious teachings of their Babylonian Talmud. If you’re unsure of this please reread Deuteronomy and Leviticus and Numbers for a refresher course in Judaic jurisprudence and chauvinism and then juxtapose it with the teachings of Jesus Christ’s New Testament. Maybe then you’ll begin to see the reasons for Christ’s murder, its connection to the abominable slaughter of the Tsar and his whole family (including the family pet dog!) and the subsequent Soviet gulag and the ongoing slaughter in the Middle East and eventually even the supreme Hoax of the 20th Century* the alleged ‘Jewish Holocaust’ of 6 million. I say maybe Sorcha because I have a lingering and growing suspicion that you might already know this only too well.
Continuing along this confusing maze of dead-end pathways we now come to an assertion of Sorcha’s that one might compare to a Rubic’s Cube of mental imaginings when trying to discover its logic and purpose. Having established that those who are out to control the world (obviously not the Zionist Jews from all that Sorcha is saying) intend to ‘exterminate’ all the stupid, unaware Jews (a contradiction in terms right there from all accounts) Faal then makes a quantum leap of logic and lands with both feet, squarely upon the absolutely amazing realization that the ‘Western Powers’(?) have always had it as their agenda to set up the Arabs as the main component of their New World Order; one stretching from the Atlantic to the Pacific oceans!
Having thus attained the pinnacle in her exasperating efforts to drag her Western readers up the winding goat trail of her confusing logic to the mountain top of reasoned deduction (!) Faal is still not content, even then, to finally sit cross-legged in holy communion with her followers upon the solid rock of her sublime assessment of the world’s (and the Jew’s) existential dilemma. No, that would not be enough for this avatar of cryptography. It therefore is necessary, in order for her esoteric teachings be fully divulged to her sangha of sanguine acolytes, that she rise up even further, transcending the peak into mystical realms of fantasy and myth. She accomplishes this feat of further marvel by introducing the Western reader to those ancient, anti-diluvian ‘dragons of old who have almost regained their former strength, have rediscovered their old technologies, and are once again prepared to stand astride our Earth with all humanity once again their slaves as in the days of old.’
Aye, now there is the final rub; the grand finale to a thesis that begins with Tolstoy and ends with the tacit affirmation that it is the Tarot and the dragons of old who are to blame for our current global crisis and not the undeniable presence of the Zionist Jewish Financial elite and their Talmudic teachings which we witness being expressed through their omnipresent political machinations in both the East and the West.
And if that’s not enough for her Western readers to grog in one reading let us further console ourselves in the knowledge, based upon Faal’s primal certainty that these reptilian regents of old are lost souls divorced by rebellion from any spiritual connection with God, that ‘we’ (who presumably recognize and understand all that we’ve been told by Sorcha) will be the ones eventually saved from eternal damnation and endless suffering. By whom she doesn’t say.
Sorcha’s concluding two paragraphs complete her efforts to convince her Western readers that it is not the Zionist Jewish Financial elite who are responsible for our sorrows but good old Lucifer himself (just like it wasn’t the Zionist Jews but the Nazis who wreaked havoc upon humanity) and that it will be Satan who will make ‘the Jewish peoples of the Western World’ to ‘suffer first’ although they may take some consolation in the fact that they won’t be the last (again a subtle reminder of Dr. Niemoeller’s famous quote referring to the Nazis). Following upon their attack will come a similar one on the rest of the Western goyim who have brought it all upon themselves by falsely accusing the Jews of complicity in all the tribulations that the world is presently experiencing.
What is so absurd about this grim prediction of an impending universal pogrom destined to overtake the Jews and the Gentiles of the West is the unabashed assertion that the Jews will ‘suffer first’. The assumption of course being that no one else has or is currently suffering in this Western world of sorrows except the downtrodden Jews who forever bear the burden of racist affliction imposed upon them by the ignorant, willful and envious Gentile races of goyim who are controlled by Satanic forces.
Faal’s fatalism, as expressed in her prophetic words, ‘as the Western peoples acceptance of the annihilation of Jewish peoples begin, they also will surely not be far behind in their own suffering and death’ reveals a mind obsessed with some deep, subliminal fear of perishing at the hands of ‘Satanic forces’ in the not too distant future. And for those of her Western readers who have taken to heart her Earth-shattering prognosis for both Jews and Gentiles (those, that is, who presumable survive the impending pogroms ahead) there will grow a ‘greater understanding’ and a ‘hope’ of a ‘greater triumph to come’ once they have broken free of old Lucifer’s mighty minions who are about to take over the world.
Now what is interesting in this final fit of franticness is the simultaneous notion of Satan as portrayed in the New Testament teachings of Jesus Christ. In Matthew, Jesus refers to the Pharisees (the precursors of the present-day Talmudic Zionist Jews) as a bunch of deceitful, hypocritical, self-righteous and iniquitous vipers and in Revelations asserts they are of the ‘synagogue of Satan’. This is therefore most curious given all what Faal has stated.
Conclusion and challenge
Having scouted the tangled terrain of Sorcha Faal’s article and made copious field notes I returned to camp to analyze my findings and observations.
Most perplexing of all was the fact that throughout the whole reconnaissance mission I had been unable to discover any direct references to the enemy at hand. Nowhere throughout Faal’s 1300 word forecast did I find a single instance where she equates the problems of today’s political and social upheavals to the Zionist Jewish Financial cartel and its innumerable, subordinate offspring appearing as the various children ‘of hell’ that the Christian New Testament speaks of. That, of course, I found rather disconcerting. And it prompted the further question: Why?
In summary there are a number of points which require stating and address:
1. The Zionists have created over the past century a fortress of lies; a tower of deception that literally reaches to the skies in some of its more overt enterprises and one on par with the Biblical Tower of Babylon which, by today’s standards is all-encompassed in what I often refer to as the M3 or the Mainstream Mind-control Media.
2. The Zionist control of global politics, evident since the Rothschild era and the beginnings of the Central Banking system and the usurious practice brought on by Fractional Reserve banking has ensured that all the major players upon the world’s stage are in one way or another indentured to and influenced by the Rothschild financial power.
For people to rant on about Capitalism versus Communism or Socialism or visa versa is therefore simplistic and fruitless and a diversionary tactic designed purposely by the cartel. Zionist control of trans-national corporations has produced a worldwide crisis wherein the Earth is under constant siege by these predatory entities disguised as ‘legal’ ‘persons’ to the point where all biological life forms are now in imminent danger of extinction. That factor, combined with the new initiatives of the imperialist nations and the military industrial complex which threaten to further pollute the planet with increasing levels of deadly toxic depleted uranium have placed the world in a clear and present danger of a real holocaust of global proportions and a genocide affecting humanity that is all-inclusive and ever-present.
3. Thus considered, had the Western democracies at the turn of the 20th Century not already been taken over by Zionist Jewish financial interests and had they realized the danger that Political Zionism posed to the world after the Revolution of 1917, they, and the world at large, would have been better off in the long-run to have collectively joined forces with Germany in the 1930s to defeat the Bolshevik Zionist Jewish empire before it had the opportunity to spread its negative influence throughout Europe, Asia and China.
4. Here in the West, those who have overcome, through willed determination and self-education, the fear and guilt instilled in them from years of mind-controlling propaganda, fully realize that their nations are presently under the iron heel of the Zionist Jewish Financiers. They recognize that their major political parties, their corporations, their public and private media, their institutions, their culture itself including even some of their churches, are all in the hands of the Zionists. For those in the know therefore Zionist control is a fait accompli. It’s not something to fear as a possibility any longer for it is beyond that stage of growth. It is here now and it is working upon the ‘free’ nations of the world to ensnare and destroy all that we cherish of our individual rights as free and sovereign human beings and to control all of our daily lives through subterfuge, mind-control and relentless economic pressure.
But…
But what about the East Sorcha? What of Russia since the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics crumbled into chaotic disarray? Are we to believe what you intimate throughout your article? Shall we blindly accept that that just because the Soviet Communist system collapsed the Zionist Jewish cartel who originally created it suddenly disappeared along with it? Poof! and they are gone?
I have a strong, abiding belief that the new Russia, like every other nation in the West, is still firmly controlled by the Zionist Jews. They have only shape-shifted into yet another external form; a new façade of the same regime but I’m convinced, based upon all the variants that we see globally, that they are still there lurking behind the new faces and the new puppets and the new champions of whatever ideological perspective they choose to project unto the West. And if this is not so Sorcha then you owe it to all your readers in both the West and the East to prove it and to explain exactly how you were able to rid your nation of this parasitic entity that has caused the world untold grief and misery for centuries.
This is my challenge to you, as one of your Western readers. If you in fact possess the Holy Grail of political and economic freedom and hold the keys to peace and political and economic security for the world’s haggard and oppressed billions, then I think it is incumbent upon you to share that wisdom and knowledge with the rest of the world.
In a more recent article of yours I note that you refer to Westerners as ‘idiots’ and Western Nations as ‘perverse’.
It is for these reasons and from all your comments that I am forced to challenge you to prove to your Western and Eastern readership that Russia is not as firmly in the grip of the Zionist Jews as the rest of the West. Explain to us how your money is created and whether or not there are major Jewish banking institutions working throughout your nation. Tell us who owns or controls your famous Pravda (Truth) newspaper. Is it now out of the hands of the Zionist Jews who created it and used it to convince the West that Communism was the answer to the world’s economic and social problems? Yes, we know that your own people never believed the lies. I could say the same for the lies that the Western Zionist media tells us. Can you convince your Western readers that the Kremlin is no longer filled with the usual assortment of Dymshits who, like their Western counterparts, inevitably fall prey to the Zionist Jewish lobbyists? And what about your major television stations Sorcha? Who owns them and collects the advertising dollars? True-blue Slavic Russians? And your radio stations and your book and magazine publishers? Are they Russian to the core or are they too held in trust by the Zionist Jewish Financiers? We’re all ears over here in the West and we wait with baited breath for you to publish clear and concise answers to all the questions which I have posed to you.
Based upon all that I have read, both on and between the lines of your article, I find that your work reveals a very narrow choice of options and conclusions. Either you are ignorant of the ways of the world and the workings of the Zionist Jewish criminal syndicate that now runs it or else you are, in some capacity, working for them to dissuade, confuse and assist, like an agent provocateur, in the breakdown of our Western culture and institutions to the benefit of the Zionist agenda.
I truly hope that is not the case and leave it up to you to respond and persuade your Western readers otherwise.
—————
© Arthur Topham & The Radical Press. In the interests of global peace, justice and security this article is given freely to all to copy and post as they see fit. Please credit the author.
Arthur Topham can be contacted at: [email protected]
* Arthur R. Butz, The Hoax of the Twentieth Century, Theses & Dissertations Press, Chicago, Illinois, Sept. 2003
Endnotes:
[1] Page 274, Controversy of Zion, Douglas Reed.
[2] All the list of Jewish Bolshevik Communists listed below come from the Michael A. Hoffman II’s article, The Documentary Record, P.O. Box 849, Coeur d’Alene, Idaho 83816 U.S.A.
[3] Page 270-71, Controversy of Zion, Douglas Reed.

{ Comments are closed }

Is Alan Hart Running Cover For AIPAC?? By Brother Nathanael Kapner

Is Alan Hart Running Cover For AIPAC?
By Brother Nathanael Kapner, Copyright 2012
December 21, 2012

Articles May Be Reproduced Only With Authorship of Br Nathanael Kapner
& Link To Real Jew News(SM)
Support The Brother Nathanael Foundation!

Or Send Your Contribution To:
The Brother Nathanael Foundation, PO Box 1242, Frisco CO 80443
E-mail: [email protected]
___________________________________

IS ALAN HART A JEW?…I don’t know if he is or not but he sure sounds like one.
In his latest piece, ‘Obama’s Hegel Test,’ Hart just can’t bring himself to identify AIPAC as a ‘Jewish Lobby’ but rather a group of individuals ‘made up of all faiths.’
I never knew that AIPAC was an ‘Inter-Faith Movement.’ Not once did I ever see an Episcopal priest or a Presbyterian minister pandering to the Jews on an AIPAC podium.
Hart would also have us believe that AIPAC enjoys the membership of Baptist Zionists, for these are the REAL so-called ‘Christian Zionists.’
What a joke! The Jews who fund, lead, and make up the operating body of AIPAC actually DESPISE Baptists dear Alan. I never saw Jerry Falwell or Pat Robertson headlining a single AIPAC Conference.
And any ‘GOYS’ associated with AIPAC (believe me, they’re NOT part of the funding or operating body) are either useful idiots, Gentile window dressing, or CRASS opportunists.

ALAN HART is an inconsequential author who penned the book, ‘Zionism: The Real Enemy of the Jews.’
My immediate response to the title was, ‘Is Alan Hart running cover for the Jews?’ For MOST would agree that Zionism is the enemy of the Palestinians, NOT Jews.
This is why I suspect that Alan Hart is a Jew himself.
For those few Jews who oppose Zionism, (Gilad Atzmon is an exception who has the guts to NAME the ‘Jewish Lobby’ as a pernicious force), seem to care more about what’s good or bad for the Jews and NOT what’s good or bad for the Gentiles. (Gilad Atzmon recently did an article on this very theme.)
Hart’s central argument is that ‘Zionism is not Judaism.’ Again, is Hart running cover for the Jews?

Believe me, for I grew up as a Jew, Zionism IS Judaism and Judaism IS Zionism. If not, then why did we declare at every Passover meal, ‘Next Year in Jerusalem!’
And why did we sing, ‘Hatikvah,’ Israel’s national anthem, at EVERY Sabbath service?
Was it because Judaism is NOT Zionism? No way! Mr Hart is fooling us all.
Alan Hart’s piece revolves around Obama’s pending nomination of Chuck Hegel as Secretary of Defense who once said, ‘the Jewish Lobby intimidates a lot of people in Congress.’
Hart quotes Jewish shill, Senator McCain, who in response to Hagel replied, ‘I know of no Jewish Lobby.’ And neither does Hart. For Hart argues that AIPAC does not represent all Jews.
FACT IS, (for I grew up as a Jew), MOST Jews DO INDEED support AIPAC, if not overtly, then tacitly.
Your run of the mill Jew (if there is such a thing) is very careful not to let the Goyim know that his allegiance is FIRST to Israel and NOT to America.
And those few Jews who don’t agree with AIPAC’s agenda would rather keep their views to themselves.
Why offend their fellow tribe members? Why get kicked out of the synagogue? You can count on one hand courageous Jews like Gilad Atzmon who vociferously oppose the power of AIPAC, that is, the JEWISH Lobby.
BOTTOM LINE: The intimidating power of BILLIONS of dollars, media influence, and the organizational track, finds JEWS at the very center.
To advance the lie that AIPAC is only marginally connected to the Jewish community is a deceptive ploy to let American Jewry, whose loyalty is to a foreign nation, off the hook.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Corbett Report Radio How to outgrow the government with Andrew Gavin Marshall

{ Comments are closed }

Two Gulags: A second warning to the West by Arthur Topham

‘I understand that you love freedom, but in our crowded world you have to pay a tax for freedom.
You cannot love freedom for yourselves alone and quietly agree to a situation where the majority
of humanity, spread over the greater part of the globe, is subjected to violence and oppression.
‘The Communist ideology is to destroy your social order. This has been their aim for 125 years and
it has never changed; only the methods have changed a little….And what is ideological war? It is a
concentration of hatred, a continued repetition of the oath to destroy the Western world.’
~Aleksandr I. Solzhenitsyn, from a Speech given in New York City to the AFL-CIO on July 9, 1975
and contained in his book, Warning to the West.
Permit me to begin this essay by stating that in comparing the case of Arthur Topham and RadicalPress.com versus Regina (the ‘Crown’ aka B’nai Brith Canada) to that of the trials and sufferings of former Nobel Peace prize winner Aleksandr I. Solzhenitsyn, I am fully aware that it will naturally be construed by some readers as little more than hyperbole on the part of the writer. Nonetheless there are a number of historic lay lines connecting the two situations which need identification in the hope that others will see and understand the systematic progression and transformation of this climacteric element of tyranny that’s been stalking the global landscape since the successful Bolshevik coup of 1917 in Russia.
First I would like to add to Solzhenitsyn’s words where he states that Communism’s ideology aim has not changed from the start, only the ‘methods’ have. This simple statement, for those of my generation and later generations, is indispensable when attempting to comprehend how the ideology itself has managed to retain its essential character even after the downfall in 1989 of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR).
Key to visualizing the doctrinal strands of the Communist ideology and their continual ability to unobtrusively weave themselves in and out of the ever-changing warp and woof of day to day history is the possession of a fundamental awareness that today’s political ideology, Zionism, is precisely the same ideology that first gave birth to its historic pedigree Marxism in the mid-19th Century its founding and funding has, from day one, flowed from the same source.
Today, those who have been paying attention to the details in the Zionist script for the creation of a one world totalitarian dictatorship understand that there is a direct connection between the House of Rothschild, the political ideology known Zionism and the premeditated, deliberate, illegal creation of the state of Israel by the United Nations back in 1948. These ideas thrash about like a load of dirty underwear in an automatic washer on most alternative blogs dealing with political issues as well as in a myriad number of posts on Facebook and other internet forums and venues. So many viewers have peered through that revolving window that now (as compared to even a decade ago when the Internet was in its nascent beginnings) the Rothschild = Zionism = Israel connection is a done deal and recognized as fact. But what is not fully understood yet by this vast number of viewers is the underlying, direct relationship between Communism and Zionism, without which the world will continue to disconnect the two apparently differing ideologies and fail to grasp the crucial historic continuity of this longstanding conspiracy; one meant to destroy the West and bring to fruition the ultimate goal of the Communist creed world slavery under an all powerful Rothschild oligarchy.

The genius that was Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn knew his enemy well enough that he was able, upon finally having his eleven year sentence in the Soviet gulag annulled in April of 1956, to actually have his first novel, One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich, published in Krushchev’s soviet union in 1962. His earlier works that included The First Circle and Cancer Ward were first published in English in 1968 and by 1970 had earned him the Nobel Prize for literature. It wasn’t until 1974 though that Solzhenitsyn was finally arrested again and expelled from the Soviet Union after a copy of his Gulag was seized by the KGB in December of 1973. He first moved to West Germany and then to Vermont in the USA where he remained until returning permanently to Russia in 1994.
Solzhenitsyn’s classic work The Gulag Archipelago was first published in English and French in June of 1974 and remains the literary lynchpin holding together the ultimate hidden knowledge regarding the cogent connection between Marxism, the supposed ‘Russian’ Revolution, Communism, Bolshevism and Zionism and their direct tie to the Rothschild oligarchy alluded to earlier.
Solzhenitsyn was able to accomplish this monumental feat of delivering to the West the evidence merely by omission. His trilogy of terror (the Gulag), which outlines the subsequent premeditated, calculated mass genocide of approximately 66 million Russians, mostly of Christian denomination, from the coup of 1917 up until Krushchev was deposed in 1964, will stand forever as the single most important work ever written on the actualizing and unfolding of Zionism’s essential tenets in a real life situation where a vast nation fell under the full control and domination of its ideological proponents.
He was able to have it published and promoted in the West by simply omitting to identify the vast majority of all the key players in his epic drama of demonic destruction as being of Ashkenazi Jewish origins. In this way he avoided the West’s Zionist press that controls all the major publishing houses throughout Europe and North America who, had he pin-pointed the true ethnic identity of the rogues and criminals and sadistic, psychopathic killers who were directly responsible for this mass murder of the Russian people (including all of Tzar Nicholas II’s family and even the family dog!), would have outright shunned him and his work and in all likelihood initiated a smear campaign against him that would have included all the same tactics now being employed by the Zionist controlled media here in Canada to attack my own person and my website RadicalPress.com.
Upon his return to the Russian republic in the mid 1990’s Solzhenitsyn resumed work on another two volume set of books entitled Two Hundred Years Together, the history of the Jews in Russia. The first volume was called Russian Jewish History 1795-1916 and when published created such a stink within Zionist circles that when volume two, The Jews in the Soviet Union came out in Russia the West was then on to him and the book was never published in the English language and still remains censored by the Jewish media to this day, a prime example of the power of the Zionist media to cover up their endless crimes against humanity.

Fortunately the German Revisionist Udo Walendy was able to procure copies and translate the book into German and from there an English translation of segments of the overall work made it to the West and were published by the Barnes Review in their September-October 2008 edition of their magazine. While not a complete version of the text the edition in question covers the issue of the major players in the gulag drama and identifies all those who were of Jewish origin, more than sufficient to firmly establish that the ‘Russian Revolution’ was in truth little more than an incredible take-over of a nation by Zionist forces funded in full measure by the Rothschild banking cartel.
When Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn was travelling around the United States back in 1975 speaking to different groups about his experiences in the Soviet concentrations camps during the late 40’s and early 50’s he kept emphasizing the perennial problem of trying to convey to people the imminent danger that Communism (aka Zionism) posed to the Western democracies. During one such talk he asked, ‘Is it possible or impossible to transmit the experience of those who have suffered to those who have yet to suffer? Can one part of humanity learn from the bitter experience of another or can it not? Is it possible or impossible to warn someone of danger?’ He then capped off his questings by firmly stating, ‘It can happen. It is possible. As a Russian proverb says: ‘When it happens to you, you’ll know it’s true.’
Speaking for myself as a writer and publisher here in Canada I too can say that when you attempt to expose the true identity of those who continually strive to remain hidden behind the outer show curtain of unfolding political events while at the same time are controlling the actions of politicians and the mainstream media and all levels of the legal system via their influential lobby groups and advisers and sayanim who have infiltrated every stratum of Canada’s cultural, social, legal, economic, governmental and corporate levels, then you will undoubtedly be attacked in their media and accused by their pressure groups such as B’nai Brith Canada of being an ‘anti-Semite’ and a ‘hate monger’ and ‘racist’ and then, based upon said accusations, arrested by their complicit police agents working for the ‘Crown’ (but another name for the representative of the City of London in England owned by the same Rothschild oligarchy that owns everything else of importance in the world today) and thrown into jail and your constitutional rights taken away from you before you even begin to approach a courtroom in order to challenge their illegal, immoral actions.
Such is the current state of affairs in Canada today whether those in denial of this fact and the complacent and lazy and otherwise too busy to notice portions of society are willing to admit this or not.
Solzhenitsyn once remarked that the very essence of Communism/Zionism was quite beyond the scope of human understanding and that for so many average, normal, moral, decent people living in the West it was just too much of a stretch of their imagination to picture the real and dreadful, vile and disgusting actions committed by these ideologically and spiritually crippled people who have plundered and pillaged and raped and destroyed untold millions of souls in their quest to gain total control of the world.
I could go on with quote after quote from Solzhenitsyn warning to those in the West of the subtle dangers that are working ceaselessly everywhere to drag down unsuspecting nations into the mire of atheistic perversions and immoral mental and spiritual torpor and confusion thus making them incapable of realizing that their rights and freedoms are being terminated until it is too late. Ultimately he says it becomes incumbent upon the individual to reject the Zionist ideology in favour of simply being a human being. In his words, ‘Such a rejection is more than a political act. It is a protest of our souls against those who would have us forget the concepts of good and evil.’
Thirty seven years have now passed since Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn travelled throughout the USA warning the nation of the impending dangers of Communism/Zionism and imploring the people to wake up and take heed of what he was telling them based upon his own first hand experience. Did the American people hear his words and did they understand? Did they do anything to forestall what was then the beginning of the shift from Communism to what we now call Zionism? Judging from all appearances Solzhenitsyn’s words fell on deaf ears or at least ears already stopped up by the din and blare of the Zionist media that had, for decades, already been pumping their minds full of Zionist propaganda.
Today that same danger has grown even more powerful and openly threatening. It was first openly declared by Douglas Reed back in 1956 in his monumental classic The Controversy of Zion and then enunciated with greater emphasis and detail in 1975 by gulag survivor Solzhenitsyn in his equally eloquent 3-volume trilogy The Gulag Archipelago and still the mass of citizenry continue to think and act as if this threat to their very existence doesn’t exist other than in the imaginations and fantasies of ‘conspiracy theorists’ and Internet fringe dwellers.
And so this very question arises once again with respect to my own trials and tribulations. For years now I have been researching and publishing information that corroborates all that these great forerunners like Reed and Solzhenitsyn have revealed to the world about the supreme danger that lies hidden within the Zionist ideology. Five years ago my website came up on the Zionist’s radar screen and they decided to do whatever it would take to demonize me and have my website removed from the Internet. That is why they created the so-called ‘HATE CRIME’ laws which were insinuated over time into Canada’s legal system via their lobbyist influence, their infiltration of the Supreme Court of Canada (four out of nine SCC Justices are now Zionist Jews) and their behind the scenes control of all of Canada’s active political parties and their leaders via non-elected ‘advisers’.
Will my warning to Canada and the rest of the world also go unheeded like those before me who had the foresight and courage to risk their very lives to bring to light this dark and menacing evil that is slowly overshadowing the lives of people around the globe as well as the very planet upon which we all must live? Will Canadians listen and begin to stand up and speak out without fear? Will they lend their support to my struggle to defeat this sec. 319(2) ‘Hate’ law and protest over the manner in which I am being treated as a Canadian citizen? Or will they stand by in silence, apathy and paranoia watching while the Zionist forces within their nation force yet another writer and researcher to take down his website and cease from telling the truth about what is happening to his country?
It is not just Arthur Topham who will be on trial in the days ahead but every Canadian who values their right to freedom of speech.

{ Comments are closed }

The Real Present World Situation

Let us face something about world news in the English language from the mass media of America, Britain and Europe. It is virtually all rotten, twisted propaganda, misinformation and collective psy-ops to keep the stupid masses hypnotized and agreeable to their own destruction and deterioration. So we turn to alternative news on the Internet where we find extreme fragmentation of views on world problems and government oppressions. The alternative news items are both revealing and superficial, designed for quick turnover for distracted minds that seek only momentary revelations of facts. Truly deep and extensive thinking about what the evil New World Order (and similar groupings in Russia, China and India) is really up to only rarely happens, and still within fragmented focus and general distraction.
The actual Big Picture of the World is not happening in human consciousness even among those who know obvious things, such as that 911, 311, 7-7 and so on are inside jobs, or that the recent ‘Al-Qaeda Multiple Planes Bombing Plot’ centered on Heathrow Airport in London is all a big political fake ‘terrorism’ concocted and instigated by government agents to help the Neocons and New Labour politically, as well as to take some pressure off of Israel. These obvious maneuvers and cover-ups become sensationalized, just like the Israeli-War-Crimes-in-Lebanon, thus distracting from other ugly and wrong things going-on, such as the sickening and bloody situation in Iraq or the rigging of elections in Mexico and the United States. And these things in turn distract us from the real problems of accelerated Global Warming, the death of the World’s oceans from pollution and de-oxygenation resulting from ocean death of plankton and burning or cutting down of the rain forests in various stupid, corrupt and desperate countries like Brazil and Indonesia.
The interactive causal feedback loops of all government wrong-doing and global destruction of the environment in the total Global Problematique are not being looked at by the so-called ‘intelligent and concerned minority’ who are endlessly out-voted by the brutally stupid and hypnotized ‘two-thirds majority’ in North America and elsewhere. So, even the thirty-six (36) percent of Americans who know 911 was an ‘inside job’, are almost as stupid, fragmented and distracted as the utterly unconscious majority who can’t face it.
What Does Israel Really Want?
What was the real purpose of the ongoing war crimes of Israel against the common people and infrastructure of Lebanon and Gaza? Their destructive, immoral behavior has not solved their problems with Hezbollah or Hamas. The New Axis of Evil (America, Britain and Israel) were clearly up to something. World Oil Supply is still up for grabs. Maybe Israel wants ethnic cleansing of Lebanon and Syria so they can bring oil from Turkey directly to Israel. Wars-For-Oil is not an unlikely theme here. The evil and insane New World Order does not, after all, want to develop Clean Fusion Energy, so they have to conquer the Mideast and Central Asia to deprive China and India of oil, even though they are outsourcing their own industrial production to those same nations, which is rather self-contradictory.
Why False Terrorism Attacks on Air Travel?
The New World Order obviously wants to destroy all civilian air travel in and from America, Britain and Europe. Why? Maybe they want to conserve jet-fuel for their endless ‘War-On-Terror-For-Oil’. Even business travel gets increasingly savaged, further injuring the economy. So, they want to reduce wealth-creation and increase militarization and police state. They seem hell-bent on creating a situation in America, Britain and Europe like the old Soviet Union, complete with prison-camps for dissidents.
Why The Open Border With Mexico?
New World Order global military expansion into the Middle East will necessitate millions of soldiers. The North American Union of Canada, the United States and Mexico will supply the All-Oil-Conquering N.A.U. Army. Inhuman weapons, including lots of Depleted Uranium, will be used to commit endless War Crimes to depopulate the Mideast and Central Asia, which will also sacrifice the health of the new Mexican army. Also, Mexican gang-members like hurting people, so they will make an excellent New World Order army of subhuman bastards.
What Is The Bird Flu Really About?
It is a rather obvious New World Order plot to spread a deadly virus throughout the World through birds that would create a pandemic that would A. kill lots of people for depopulation and B. necessitate introduction of a universal vaccine with electronic tracking devices plus possibly injecting whole populations with AIDS or other designer viruses, such as we have seen being massively tested in Africa through UN vaccine injections.
So far, they have not been able to spread it adequately through natural bird-migrations, so they have been injecting bird flocks with it artificially to try to keep Bird Flu alive and spreading. They have also been working hard to develop a strain of it that will more readily leap across to humans. Even on the alternative websites they have some control over, they try to spread mass fear of a Bird Flu Pandemic, because that would make their lethal vaccines more acceptable to the stupid public.
What Does The N.W.O. Want From North Korea?
At this date, it seems that North Korea is being secretly squeezed and driven further and further into its own paranoia so that it will sooner or later launch all-out nuclear weapons attacks on South Korea, Japan and the United States, which would reduce population across-the-board, eliminate global industrial competitors and justify massive nuclear retaliation of some sort, at least against North Korea.
South Korea and Japan should understand that they are being set-up as sacrificial straw dogs.
Why All The Fixation On Bush The Moron?
George W. Bush does not decide anything. He is a mere puppet president of the Neocons. Dick Cheney is more of a genuine decision-maker but team-player of the Neocons. Cheney is vicious and stupid (just like Donald Rumsfeld and Condoleezza Rice) but is far more able to use his twisted brain than Bush. When the alternative media criticize Bush’s ‘thinking’, ‘policies’ and ‘decisions’, we have to ask what actual ‘thinking’, ‘policies’ or ‘decisions’? What is more mystifying about Bush, who was installed twice as President of the United States through Neocon and Republican election-rigging in 2000 and 2004, is why has the New World Order put forth such a dumb, bumbling ex-chimpanzee as Leader of America? Their whole program would have had more credibility with pretty much any other politician in America.
Why Does the New World Order Want To Torture Innocent People So Much?
The increasing global torture network of America, Britain, Europe and Israel is not helping public relations throughout the rest of the world. The evil and insane New World Order obviously feels that it is in their interest to destroy and weaken all Human Rights on Earth. Why is that? Do they have some form of hidden, collective dark government Cult of Satanism (Illuminati) that wants to further utter harmfulness against human beings as a kind of collusional shared sadism? Or do they also feel they are creating a fear-weapon in the world of ‘See what can happen to anyone who opposes us?’? That would make it a very black Psy-Ops campaign. C.I.A. agents who have themselves been voluntarily tortured in the C.I.A. Torture School often make themselves into precision instruments of these heavy sado-masochistic tendencies within the New World Order. They are ways that Criminal Insanity within the American, British, European and Israeli governments can make Evil ‘up close and personal’. They were obviously just getting warmed up in Chile and Argentina.
Irreversible Global Warming and De-oxygenation
http://www.cosmicearthtransition.com/
The New World Order is working very hard to increase Global Warming and De-oxygenation so that the entire planet Earth will be unable to support animal or human life in the near future. The horrible fact of Global De-oxygenation is one of the most avoided subjects in the Alternative media. Why is that?
Deliberate Instigation Of Volcanic Eruptions
There is growing evidence that the New World Order is utilizing HAARP and/or other atmospheric or satellite weapons to bring about volcanic eruptions, earthquakes and tidal waves. This is also amazingly undiscussed in the Alternative News Media. Why is that?
The Obvious Hidden Pattern
It is clear enough, if you want the clarity, that the New World Order is carrying out a systematic destruction of the planet and humanity with no end in sight in the face of a fragmented and ineffectual Alternative Media that is itself increasingly infiltrated, perverted and weakened, both by deliberate N.W.O. invasiveness and the self-complacency of the Alternative Media itself. Most ‘good people who care’, like Cindy Sheehan, still imagine that legitimate democratic forces in America will turn things around for the better. But how, pray tell me, will the upper third of confused, fragmented and distracted Americans turn around the even more confused, fragmented and distracted lower two-thirds of Americans?
Good Change From Within Humanity Unlikely
Given the actual inner state of ‘consciousness’ of Humanity, it is highly unlikely that a truly Good Change can happen in either governance or mass human behavior. So, we have to look at this horribly obvious truth and not look away from it. Are you, as a slightly thoughtful and aware human being, willing and able to do this? Humanity obviously wants unconsciously to suffer and to destroy Itself and the environment of the Earth. Can you see this? It is not just the evil and insane New World Order manipulators doing all the shit, for all that needs the unconscious cooperation of the human masses. Therefore, the very tiny minority of truly thoughtful and aware people on the planet Earth had better now shift to Plan B because Plan A (Internet Persuasion) is not working.
Something Like A Cosmic Miracle Is Needed
If you are bright enough to come this far, you realize that the Earth needs a Cosmic Miracle or perhaps a Benign Alien Invasion to put humanity under harmonious and ethical government from Outside. Naturally, as in the Roddenberry T.V. series, Earth: Final Conflict, there would be massive, stupid resistance to Benign Extraterrestrial Government, however well-intended on their part. There is also a real problem as to the actual nature and tendencies at work of our well-meaning Extraterrestrial Governors. They would not have to be Reptilian people-eaters to still incidentally have some mistaken tendencies or outright incompetence in dealing with human nature of the Earth. So, even with a Cosmic Miracle or Benign Extraterrestrial Takeover, there would still be a rough road ahead to establish harmonious evolution of the Earth and its ecosystem. Extraterrestrial Ecosystematics may not be fully transferable to Terrestrial Ecosystematics. Even great learning elsewhere might create inadvertent cognitive barriers in Extraterrestrial teams appointed to help out here with problems and intricacies that have not been encountered elsewhere. Our helpers-from-Outside would have to do some unlearning, deconstruction of their mental models, in order to reconstruct their learning here.
In a way, the whole Earth is like Panama, where ‘no good deed goes unpunished’. So, just getting rid of the present nasty assholes of the New World Order would only be a tiny step forward into a future for humanity that could really work. There is just no point in getting too excited about a possible Divine and Cosmic Intervention, given the actual nature of both terrestrial humanity and extraterrestrial humanities. You might also want to notice that so far the Gods who rule the Earth and secretly control the so-called ‘Evolution Of Humanity’ have been creating a lot of sustained stupidity, incompetence, catastrophe and pain on the Earth from before-the-beginning. It seems that the supposedly Omnipotent All-ruling Deity has a fucking mean streak of patient, long-term sadism Himself. Either that or He is not quite as Omnipotent as we would like. So, God has a dark, nasty side or He is weak and too easily opposed by dark, nasty forces.
The only way we can compensate personally for this God Problem is to try to become Superhuman Gods as soon as possible ourselves through Yoga and Self-realization and not expect much help from our usual God or Gods who run the shitty show on Earth and even beyond on only slightly less painful planets in our generally fucked-up Galaxy or the neighbors in Andromeda. Our own potential Godself Realization is the only truly decisive lever we have on our destiny, whether on Earth or through reincarnation in extraterrestrial bodies elsewhere. An internal sense-of-cosmic-direction is our ultimate weapon against all divine and cosmic incompetence everywhere. Meditate on this and do not be a gullible fool! There is always another Ruling Deity in the System next-door on any scale. And there is always some divine hang-up even there. All divine omnipotence and evolutionary competence are relative. The Whole of Existence is an infinite school for both Gods and men. This is the Cosmic, Infinite Truth if you want it! It may be a little scary at first, but sooner or later you will have to jump into the Cosmic Ocean and get wet-all-over.
The Earth May Be Moth-balled Soon
The people of the planet Iarga that orbits the star Procyon say that Earth Moth-balling is the real cosmic plan for the near future. In this case, the Earth will become something like Nightland in the old gothic science-fiction novel of William Hope Hodgson and the souls or causal bodies of humanity will be shipped out for reincarnation on other planets according to their types and levels. In fact, the Iargans say that they hope they will not have to take any confused, neurotic semi-criminal souls or causal bodies from Earth because of the inevitable disruptions and problems such reincarnated individuals would cause in Iargan society.
If the Iargan assertions about Earth and Humanity are correct, there is not going to be just the destruction of eighty percent of Humanity as predicted by Herakhan Baba Gorakhnath—a divine demigod Himself! No. We are talking one-hundred- percent destruction of the Human Race. So, ponder a scenario where the Earth is not just Mothballed, but rather intense radioactivity and storage of the Earth would require re-population by a hardy race of highly evolved Beetle-people eventually, for only certain kinds of insects can survive or evolve on a radioactive planet! This too has been predicted by Starry Wisdom Seers, if you can handle this kind of information, which I seriously doubt.
Ask Advice Of Your Death
In the light of all the above unprocessed cosmic information and prophecies, you better give yourself a strong dose of Nagual Wisdom from the Carlos Castaneda books, which means that you picture Your Coming Death on this God-forsaken Earth as always standing beside you to your left at arm’s length as a kind of personal angel or inorganic being who will advise you about what to do in the light of Your Coming Death. There is a powerful realism to doing something like this, for, after all, our chances of persuading Humanity and its criminally insane leaders to wake-up and take things in an ethical and constructive direction border on nil. It is O.K. to engage in some Chögyam Trungpa ‘Basic Goodness’ as ‘Shambhala Warriors’ so we can help out pitiful humanity, but Nagual Warriorship is a little more to the point personally. Surely you have to agree if you are not too far-gone worrying about the leering clown face of Tony Blair that the New World Order likes to shit on our intelligence with. Nor do we have to worry ourselves that Robin Cook may have been assassinated for letting it out publicly that Al-Qaeda, ‘The Base’, is from the Secret Intelligence ‘Database’ of Islamic Freedom-fighters, like Osama Bin Laden, for attacking the Russians in Afghanistan and later as Western tools or pawns for pseudo-Islamic self-terrorism. Nor need we worry that Al-Qaeda, ‘The Base’, is what Arabs commonly call their toilet, so they would never call their own real Holy War Network by such a name. But it is almost amusing that Arab Toilets may be the concurrent cause of an all-out death and destruction of Humanity arranged by Henry Kissinger, Richard Perle, the Rockefellers, the Rothschilds and similar demonic maniacs as tools of Gods-with-mean-streaks. And all this under the absurd jurisdiction of the American President who is obviously the first human incarnation of a chimpanzee. In this light, the Absurd Philosophy of Albert Camus becomes more advanced than the Bhagavad Geeta. If you don’t want to ask advice of your death, then read Being and Time by Martin Heidegger and lower your self into Existential Reality slowly and thoughtfully. Every ‘Hitch-Hiker in the Galaxy’ should have Being and Time along with his towel. This should get you amply beyond David Icke without having to lose sight of the obvious fact of Fourth Dimensional Nasty Reptilians probably controlling most of the Earth’s political, military and economic ‘leaders’.
Also Remember This
If there is anything stated in this article that you consider just ‘too-far-out’ or ‘dangerously subversive’ keep in mind that I, Ogmios, am quite obviously an easily discredited and insane nutcase conspiracy theorist whose cosmic information is too much even for the handful of conspiracy theorists who might accidentally fumble into this unpopular, minor website.
—————-
©2006 Ogmios

{ Comments are closed }

Why I Ought to Sue Ezra Levant by Arthur Topham

Why I Ought to Sue Ezra Levant
by Arthur Topham
November 11, 2012
As one can see from Ezra’s photo that appeared on the back cover of his 1996 book, YouthQuake, a production of The Fraser Institute, a right wing think tank that tends to promote Zionist ideals masked under deceptive language, he was at that time a fairly chipper-looking, albeit geeky looking eager beaver 24 year old young man already marked for fame and fortune.
In fact he’s actually the same age as my eldest daughter and obviously grew up in the same Canadian cultural setting and time period albeit it’s highly unlikely that his parents were hippies like my children’s parents were.
At the time Ezra’s book came out Michael Walker, Executive Director for The Fraser Institute remarked in its Preface that it was, ‘…written by one of the brightest student interns ever to work at The Fraser Institute. It is important because of the insights it provides into the mind-set of the next generation of Canadian leaders. For, certainly, Ezra Levant is going to be a Leader.’
Well, sixteen years later and many a mile down the road to fame and fortune we see that Ezra the younger, now 40 years, is in a position of some importance within the Zionist mainstream media in Canada having his own talk show on the SunTV News Network out of Toronto called The Source and having within his power the ability to help set the nation’s trends in terms of influencing television viewers across the country and beyond.
Now recently, having been charged by the Queen of England for supposedly committing a ‘hate’ crime against ‘people of the Jewish religion or ethnic origin’ I noticed that Ezra had taken a keen interest in my case and requested an interview with my lawyer Doug Christie to discuss it on his talk show. Having been caught up in the ‘hate speech’ web himself over the past number of years with the same culprit responsible for having laid the present charge against me I could see why he would find the subject of some interest and want to discuss it further.
Of course Ezra didn’t have the chutzpah to invite me on to his show like he did in the case of Marc Lemire who also has been battling with the B’nai Brith ‘Hate Speech’ Internet censors for so long that I can’t recall when he first was attacked. Marc, like Ezra and myself, also was falsely accused by this same chronic complainer; a deluded die-hard deceiver and Zionist psychophant who has filed more suits in his closet of hate than most Jewish tailors manage to do in a lifetime!
So I figured, second best, that it was a good thing Ezra should at least interview Doug Christie and get some measure of response from the man who has been defending innocent victims of this hate lobby for decades now. When Marc Lemire sent me the url to Ezra’s show later the same day I was pleased to see that it had taken place. Then, after watching Ezra’s performance, I readily saw that for all of his feigned concern over the injustices of the infamous sec. 13 legislation and now section 319(2) of the Criminal Code of Canada, both of which the serial complainant and the B’nai Brith have been and are using in their ongoing witch hunts to silence criticism of Israel and the Zionist doctrine, there he was on national television doing his damnedest to slander and libel my name ostensibly in the interests of ‘free speech’!
Oi vey I thought to myself, with friends like this who needs enemies? Here he is, one of Canada’s most vocal advocates for freedom of speech on the Internet and he’s sitting there telling the world blatant lies about me and making me out to be some sort of crazed Jew hating anti-Semite!
Within the short span of about six minutes good ol’ free speech advocate Ezra Levant managed to slander, defame and libel me as many times as possible punctuating every comment or question to lawyer Doug Christie with at least one or more ad hominem epithets all in order to show the world just how grand and liberal the mainstream media truly is when it comes to freedom of expression.
Yes, said Ezra, that Topham is an ‘anti-Semite’ and ‘offensive’ and an ‘anti-Zionist [which is] code for anti-Semitic’ and his website is ‘gross’ and his comments ‘repulsive’ and everything that he does is ‘motivated by a form of malice’ and on top of that I also think he’s a ‘nobody’ and an ‘anti-Semitic idiot and a right wing wacko’ and you know really when it comes right down to it ‘I HATE ARTHUR TOPHAM!’
It was truly amazing to watch and listen to all his hyper-charged frenetic frothing regarding my person all the while waxing eloquent about I was surely going to win my case. Well, being a Zionist insider maybe he’s privy to something most people don’t know. Time will tell.
Now the question needs to be asked, ‘Where is the deception in this apparently earnest show of support for freedom of speech on the part of Ezra Levant?’
When Ezra first introduced his topic to his television audience his initial statement was that he knew of me because I had been ‘spamming’ him for years which, of course, was an outright lie. Ezra and myself had in the past exchanged emails and I was registered on his blog where I contributed commentary on some of articles. On top of that other supporters of his had gallantly attempted to solicit Ezra to lend his support to my case with Canadian Human Rights Commission but he merely dismissed them by stating that I was an ‘anti-Semite’ and that he didn’t deal with such creatures. When Ezra eventually asked to be taken off my list I respected his request and did so.
In this vein therefore I would ask readers to take a look at an article which I wrote and published on my website that was written back in July of 2008; one that deals with precisely the same issues that are still being argued and discussed today with regard to Ezra’s one-sided view of who exactly ought to be given positive exposure when it comes to Freedom of Speech and who is deserving of the type of defamation that one witnessed during his Nov. 8th interview with Doug Christie.
Please see:
Free Speech for Jews: A Critique of Ezra Levant’s ‘Jews for free speech’ article
During the show the point was made, by Ezra Levant and Doug Christie, that both hate and love are emotions which should never ever fall under the control of any government agency and that they ought to remain sacrosanct and protected by law. And that is true. And for that reason alone I could say that I ought to love Ezra Levant for espousing such a view just as I love Doug Christie for taking a similar and adamant stand on the same issue.
But, as a person who, in years, has also come to realize that our nation is not functioning by the rule of law any longer and also by the fact that the Deputy Assistant Attorney General of the province of British Columbia (an appointed minion of the ‘Crown’ who in all likelihood is pro-Zionist) has saw fit to actually proceed with an attempt to find me guilty of an alleged ‘thought crime’ by the most notorious witch hunting Jewish lobby group on the face of the planet, I find myself having to protest to the maximum this deceitfully sly slight of hand which Ezra Levant has used to tarnish my good name and to prejudice the Canadian public against me right from the start of my impending trial.
Ezra Levant is a lawyer as well as a Zionist mouthpiece for the msm and he is fully cognizant of the fact that while Sec. 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act is now in the process of being wiped off the books by the federal government he is also well aware that Section 319(2) of the Criminal Code of Canada is still in full operation and remains a lethal weapon for use by the B’nai Brith lobby here in Canada. They obviously intend to use it to their fullest potential in order to set a precedent in law that would, should I be convicted of this phoney charge, affect any other Canadian who might at some time in the future try to speak and write the truth about what Zionism truly represents or who might question the genocide of the Palestinian people in Gaza by the Israeli government. And so in that context I find it absolutely disgraceful and outrageous and malicious that someone in Ezra’s position would be doing his utmost to bad mouth me in every way possible at a time when this despicable action is being taken against me by B’nai Brith Canada.
There are of course other more sinister aspects to the hate-mongering of Ezra Levant which should be noted and addressed. The world is full of medicated mind-controlled zombies these days and should one of them happen to hear Ezra Levant going on and on about how how he hates me and what a malicious idiot and anti-Semite I am there is then the possibility that my life could be endangered by such acts of premeditated hatred and slander. Add to that the fact that I am now forced to live unarmed in an area where there is no emergency police assistance close by and you can see why I am a bit concerned about these spiteful lies that Levant has been spreading throughout the msm via Sun News Network. In this sense, rather than loving Ezra, I think I ought to sue Ezra Levant and the Sun News Network for having jeopardized both my physical safety and the safety of my family as well as prejudicing the public against me via his libelous and hurtful lies.
Four years ago when composing the critique mentioned above I wrote, ‘But, alas, I cannot, at this point and in good conscience, condemn Ezra Levant fully for some of the errors he is making. Whether it is conscious on his part or just plain ignorance of all the facts I truly do not know… when I was 36, I too was unaware of the degree of involvement in global politics that the Zionists actually represented. It took me close to sixty years to finally figure it out so in that context there is always hope that a bright young man like Ezra Levant, will come to realize the error of his ways [but] if you are going to be a ‘Leader’ here in Canada then you are going to have to hit the books some more and get a much firmer grasp on the issue of Political Zionism and learn how this alien and anti-Christian Talmudic doctrine is affecting the Canadian landscape. It behooves you to understand the primary motives of those who are determined to turn this nation into another Communist gulag. Not just for the sake of those ‘individual Jews who love ‘freedom of speech’ but for the rest of us non-Jew Canadians who also cherish these very same ideals.’

{ Comments are closed }

I HATE ARTHUR TOPHAM! Ezra Levant on The Source Nov. 8, 2012

Dear Radical Readers and Free Speech Lovers,
After my court appearance this morning in Quesnel my lawyer Doug Christie asked me if I thought it would be okay to go on Ezra Levant’s Sun News Talk Show The Source to discuss my case. I told Doug that Levant was my arch enemy but that he was welcome to go on his show.
Late this evening (very late actually) I received the following article and video that Marc Lemire put together.
BIG thank you to Marc for doing this.
I must admit that it is a rather somewhat comical interview/discussion with Ezra vibrating as usual like some speed freak in need of a fix but regardless of the fact that he gets an opportunity to carry on the same smear campaign that the rest of his Zionist Jew buddies are doing across the Canadian mediascape and tell his audience that he ‘Hates Arthur Topham’ the message is that hate is not an emotion that ought to be governed by Canada’s courts any more than love.
The show ought to draw more attention to the site and also make more Canadians realize that no one should be charged with a criminal offence merely for expressing an opinion or facts related to anyone or any group. It certainly doesn’t make B’nai Brith Canada look good and that in itself is a positive thing.
DougLaughing
My lawyer Doug Christie couldn’t help but break out laughing when he heard Levant shout out, ‘I hate Arthur Topham!’ Neither could I for that matter. It was a kosher Kodiak moment for sure! 🙂
Levant predicts that I will win the case. For once I hope he’s right on that! 🙂
Please pass this along if you can.
For Justice and Free Speech on the Internet,
Arthur Topham
Pub/Ed
RadicalPress.com
‘Digging to the root of the issues since 1998’
—————————————————
Muslim Hate Speech and Arthur Topham:
The deception of ‘Hate Speech’ Laws
DougontheSource
[VIDEO] Doug Christie with Ezra Levant discussing the Arthur Topham Case and ‘hate speech’ Laws [Click the url below to watch]
http://blog.freedomsite.org/2012/11/doug-christie-on-suntv-authur-topham.html
http://canadianhumanrightscommission.blogspot.ca/2012/11/muslim-hate-speech-and-authur-topham.html
You can find out more about the Topham case at http://www.radicalpress.com. Topham was charged under Canada’s ridiculous criminal ‘hate’ law Section 319 of the Criminal Code. This nutty law tries to control human emotions, and as the norm for so-called ‘hate’ laws … only applies to one certain type of opinion.
When ‘hate’ is promoted in Canada, it is only criminalized if the communicator of the message is an alleged ‘nazi’ or white ‘anti-Semite’. Just look at all the cases stretching back to the 1970’s. If you hate whitey — no problem. If you are Muslim and hate Jews — no problem. If you are Jewish and hate Muslims — no problem.
Here is proof of my point:
On the same day that white skinned alleged ‘nazi’ and ‘anti-Semite’ Arthur Topham was charged with criminal ‘hate speech’, the police looked at brown skinned Muslim hate against Jewish Canadians, and found no criminal ‘hate’.
In the Alice in Wonderland world of human rights and ‘hate speech’ … some ‘hate’ is criminal, while other ‘hate’ is just fine.
TorontoIslamicSchool
Lets compare for a second, what Arthur Topham wrote to what was ‘anti-Jewish Curriculum’ at the East end Toronto Madrassah. One was criminalized, the other was not.
Arthur Topham posted on his website:
‘It’s been ongoing since the day I first openly criticized the Zionist Jews and their political dogma or ideology known as Zionism. That was back during the heady last days of the 20th Century when I was publishing my monthly hard copy edition of The Radical, an alternative tabloid which ran for forty-two consecutive editions ending in June of 2002.’
..
And from the National Post which described what Topham allegedly said and did:
The Biological Jew depicts Jews as parasites that suck the blood from their ‘host’ societies while the Protocols is a fraudulent book that purports to describe a conspiracy for worldwide Jewish domination.
..
Police arrested Mr. Topham and questioned him on May 16. According to a transcript of his police interview that was posted online, he asked the investigating officer, Det. Const. Terry Wilson of the B.C. Hate Crime Team, whether he had been trained in Tel Aviv or whether Mossad had come to Canada to train him.
He lectured the officer about how Jews ‘control what you’re doing’ and said they had ‘created the unit you’re working for.’ He asked the officer if he was a Christian and scolded him for what he was doing.
‘These guys have spent the last 2,000 years trying to destroy our religion, and you like a Judas are out here like a, like one of their dogs chasing down people who are trying to defend the Christian religion,’ he said. ‘You ought to be ashamed of yourself.’
——
Now lets compare what the Muslim’s East end Madrassah (Toronto) allegedly taught to children in their Curriculum. This again is quotes from the National Post’s article (published Nov 8, 2012). I can not actually verify their authenticity:
‘End of Jewish Plots and Treacheries: Ever since the Prophet’s entry into Madina, the treacherous Jews had vehemently opposed him and his Islamic call, evoking memories of their hostility to the previous Prophet, Jesus Christ, half a millennium ago. The crafty Jews entered into an alliance with the polytheist Quraish in a bid to stamp out Islam. They conspired to kill Prophet Muhammad despite the fact that he was lenient towards them and had treated them kindly, hoping to convince them of Islam’s truth. But eventually as Jewish plots and aggressions increased, he had no choice other than to take up arms against them, in order to protect Islam and the Muslims. At the battle of Khaiber which is famous for Imam Ali’s heroic exploits, the Prophet defeated them ending Jewish intrigues and conspiracies in Arabia.’ [Emphasis added]
Why is it that so-called ‘hate’ laws only ever target one certain opinion, and all the other haters are given a free pass? Would Canada’s criminal prohibition against ‘hate’ ever be found constitutional if the courts looked at the actual effects and operation of the law? After 30 years, it is as clear as day; this law targets a certain range of opinions in Canada, and has little to do with actually removing hate. As we have documented over and over, some hate in Canada is perfectly fine and non-criminal.
If you have an opinion which can be classified as ‘nazi’ or ‘anti-Semitic’ and you’re White; expect the state to drop the ‘trifecta of tolerance‘ of you. Which is a three stage, proven framework, to break and humiliate the victim — all at the expense of Canadian taxpayers who foot the bill for this multi-million dollar make-work project. The stages can be defined as: ostracized, vilified and criminalized.
Section 319 of the Criminal Code is an affront to justice and freedom in Canada and should be repealed immediately. Canada is a tolerant country with intelligent people, and we do not need the nanny state (at the behest of special interest groups and plaintiffs of fortune) looking over the shoulders of people and parsing the words of individuals that wish to express non-violent opinions on controversial subjects as race or religion.
We have tried the censorship of criminal and civil prohibition’s against ‘hate’ speech since the 1970’s with little positive effect.
Isn’t it time to give freedom a chance?
-Marc Lemire
Free Speech Activist and the only
Canadian to ever win a Section 13 case
http://www.freedomsite.org
http://www.stopsection13.com

{ Comments are closed }